the best way is javascript. one can reassemble the full email link on a page without having to worry about spambots picking it up. http://email.calpoly.edu/spam/HarvestingPreventi on.html (just happened to be at the top of google)
what do you mean "running off" the servers? Are they thin clients? do they mount user homes? Both can be solid choices if they are used correctly.
On our network we use NFS (with kerberos authentication) to mount all the user homes on client PCs in our labs, and we have only had a few minor hookups (and only one incident of unscheduled downtime) in the past 2 years. Also, on our windows side, we use windows 2003 server to host a domain, which all of the client computers are connected to, that hosts user accounts. Everyone has their own profile, and no one can write to c:\ (standard for limited users in XP). Any applications that are installed only affect the account on which they were installed.
um....not really....The amount of IP bandwidth which could be pushed through this wide spectrum would easily support broadcasted (255.255.255.255) IP tv along with a general purpose internet connection.
Dont believe me? Think about it this way: we are switching to digital broadcast which will greatly shrink the need for a wide spectrum of frequencies. Now add a tiny bit of IP overhead (which would probably be cancelled out by newer compression technologies which would be a lot easier to distribute to these IP based boxes), and you have a general purpose internet line.
To address privacy concerns, the packets would be a UDP broadcast. No one knows what you are watching.
Don't forget, some universities are worse. Especially when they try to accomplish what they dont know how to accomplish.
At Cal Poly, SLO, The residental network servers throttle http traffic down to under 200KB/sec/user, The hope they had was that this would stop bittorrent downloading. All p2p services seem unaffected.
Well, I have a very similar router wrt54g, and I dont use it wirelessly. I have found that its worth the extra few bucks to get a router if dd-wrt can be loaded on it, so I can have the control of a $500 router (telnet, vpn, QoS, being able to adjust stuff like connection timeout, etc). With dd-wrt one can easily make one of these routers sustain 800+ simultanious connections, not to mention croning wake on Lan, or booting a comptuer remotely.
When those companies are already at the top, what does it matter? why would they not like "free market"?
In recent years there has been a turn on supporting big businesses like AT+T, which was split up because the company dominated all of the telecomunications in the 80s, providing poor service to consumers at exorbant prices. If the government didn't step in they would still be doing that.....oh wait......
Slashdot Mirror
the best way is javascript. one can reassemble the full email link on a page without having to worry about spambots picking it up.i on.html (just happened to be at the top of google)
t ml
http://email.calpoly.edu/spam/HarvestingPrevent
Another is tricky html tags... http://www.web-designz.com/tools/email_encoder.sh
....We're making it better!
Phising wouldn't be necessary if myspace moved to the open Wikimedia format
Works fine? All of the official fedora core 5 yum repositories have been offline since the release of FC6
They are doing their part to stop data trafficing.
what do you mean "running off" the servers? Are they thin clients? do they mount user homes? Both can be solid choices if they are used correctly.
On our network we use NFS (with kerberos authentication) to mount all the user homes on client PCs in our labs, and we have only had a few minor hookups (and only one incident of unscheduled downtime) in the past 2 years. Also, on our windows side, we use windows 2003 server to host a domain, which all of the client computers are connected to, that hosts user accounts. Everyone has their own profile, and no one can write to c:\ (standard for limited users in XP). Any applications that are installed only affect the account on which they were installed.
fake netgear? This explains a lot....
The only difference is that our government already knows who we are...screw the registration.
The author linked to the windows version
especially in light of all the bloaty software and annoying features aol has taken on: http://www.stopbadware.org/reports/reportdisplay?r eportname=aol082706
Maybe the macs that are loading the firmware on these ipods were *compromised*
Don't forget about the SCO linux users...
"Technical Details
* 30GB digital media player stores up to 7,500 songs, 25,000 pictures or 100 hours of video" - Amazon.com
um....not really....The amount of IP bandwidth which could be pushed through this wide spectrum would easily support broadcasted (255.255.255.255) IP tv along with a general purpose internet connection.
Dont believe me? Think about it this way: we are switching to digital broadcast which will greatly shrink the need for a wide spectrum of frequencies. Now add a tiny bit of IP overhead (which would probably be cancelled out by newer compression technologies which would be a lot easier to distribute to these IP based boxes), and you have a general purpose internet line.
To address privacy concerns, the packets would be a UDP broadcast. No one knows what you are watching.
Don't forget, some universities are worse. Especially when they try to accomplish what they dont know how to accomplish.
At Cal Poly, SLO, The residental network servers throttle http traffic down to under 200KB/sec/user, The hope they had was that this would stop bittorrent downloading. All p2p services seem unaffected.
They will probably do what tivo did.
kirk@enterprise# touch -f CommunicationsOfficer
ehh thats nothing.cars fall off the bay bridge every day! http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=san+franci sco,+ca&ie=UTF8&z=19&ll=37.791553,-122.38519&spn=0 .001253,0.005107&t=k&om=1
Wouldn't want to clean viruses out of this one!
Now, imagine a beowulf cluster of those NOT running one instance of Vista!
anyway, if one is on a schedule, they should stick to watching tv shows :-)
Well, I have a very similar router wrt54g, and I dont use it wirelessly. I have found that its worth the extra few bucks to get a router if dd-wrt can be loaded on it, so I can have the control of a $500 router (telnet, vpn, QoS, being able to adjust stuff like connection timeout, etc). With dd-wrt one can easily make one of these routers sustain 800+ simultanious connections, not to mention croning wake on Lan, or booting a comptuer remotely.
When those companies are already at the top, what does it matter? why would they not like "free market"?
In recent years there has been a turn on supporting big businesses like AT+T, which was split up because the company dominated all of the telecomunications in the 80s, providing poor service to consumers at exorbant prices. If the government didn't step in they would still be doing that.....oh wait......
I wonder how many hours per gallon this will be....maybe some laptops will recieve ULEL (Ultra Low Emmissions Laptop)?
Even then I wouldn't want to be in a closed garage with this one.
its worth it if the system doesn't run right ;-)