Slashdot Mirror


Laptops Searched and Confiscated at U.S. Border

An anonymous reader writes, "According to an article in the New York Times, the Association of Corporate Travel Executives is asking the U.S. government for more detailed guidelines on when and why a laptop gets confiscated at the U.S. border, which, anecdotally, is happening more often. The story includes a report from a business traveler who had her laptop confiscated over a year ago and has yet to have it returned." According to the article, a knowledgeable lawyer said: "[Border guards] don't need probable cause to perform... searches under the current law. They can do it without suspicion or without really revealing their motivations." And an ACTE exective is quoted, "Potentially, this is going to have a real effect on how international business is conducted."

527 comments

  1. Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Sir, please place your laptop computer on the table for inspection."
    "OK"
    "Please turn it on, Sir."
    "Um.. er.. ah.."
    "Turn on the laptop, Sir!" (Suddenly it grows quiet as everyone stares, particularly some armed security personnel)
    "Er ah, OK." Click. zwinnngg zwikka zwikka bweet.
    "Pornographic wallpaper, no problem. Thousands of mp3's, no problem."
    "Um-er-ah.
    sniff sniff sniff Arf! whine Whine Arf! Arf!
    "What's this then!?!"
    "Huh?"
    "Sir, we're going to have to confiscate this laptop computer, our highly trained canine has detected the presence of a banned and extremely dangerous substance!"

    Read about it here and here

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Oooooh, vegimite. And here I was thinking it'd be Dihydrogen Monoxide.

      Anyway, this is a good thing. All those materials and chemicals that end with -ite are probably dangerous.

    2. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 4, Informative

      Especially if you're from Krypton.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    3. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Sir, we're going to have to confiscate this laptop computer, our highly trained canine has detected the presence of a banned and extremely dangerous substance!"

      I realize that Aussies love their vegemite, and Brits love their marmite, but for those of us who didn't grow up eating it, it's a substance worth confiscating at the border.

      That stuff is just nasty. :-P
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Sillygates · · Score: 1

      They are doing their part to stop data trafficing.

      --
      I fear the Y2038 bug
    5. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd do their part to stop trafficing. And international trade. And gee- how about stopping illegal immigrants as well?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    6. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      Ahh, but Vegemite is full of all the goodies that make Red Bull so cracktasticly delicious.

      As a Canadian who learned to love the stuff living down under, I suggest trying it sparingly with old cheddar and toast. Treat it less like peanut butter and more like salt and it's pretty good.

      Costs a fucking fortune here though :(

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    7. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      As a Canadian who learned to love the stuff living down under, I suggest trying it sparingly with old cheddar and toast. Treat it less like peanut butter and more like salt and it's pretty good.

      Hmmmm .... OK, maybe I can see that. I've some marmite in the cupboard I use in some recipes to get some more B vitamins (vegetarian). Maybe I'll give it a try.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    8. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by CoderBob · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ahh, but Vegemite is full of all the goodies that make Red Bull so cracktasticly delicious.


      It goes well with Vodka??
    9. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with that- after first researching this story I found a similar suggestion with cheese and spam. Last night I tried it with crappy American Process Slices, braunschwagger, butter and marmite on toast- the taste was divine!

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by jbrader · · Score: 4, Funny

      Red Bull and vodka tastes worse than gasoline.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    11. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by gardyloo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Red Bull and vodka tastes worse than gasoline.

            Ah. But what octane?

    12. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 2, Funny

      maybe, but it's a far more powerful fuel source.

    13. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      C'mon, everyone knows that Vegemite is what eco-terrorists and PETA use as an Earth-friendly alternative to dynamite.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    14. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That means you're A)going with crap vodka, or B)not going with enough vodka. An RBV tastes best when it's mixed fairly strong. If your local bartender has a problem with that, ask them to figure out, ounce for ounce, which costs more. Your Red Bull Vodkas will start being poured nice and stiff after that. In my experience, there are really only two ways to drink RBV (which my group of acquaintances has dubbed Thug Passion.) Either the Thug Classico, which is a Pint Glass with ice almost to the top, Absolut Mandarin poured in just over half way, then Red Bull to top the glass off (About 2/3 of a can.) The other way that I have been enjoying the most lately is the Thug Lightly, which is the same recipe, but regular Absolut Vodka with sugar free Red Bull. The Thug Lightly works much better for a big night of drinking, as there is less syrupy aftertaste, and the lack of sugar means that morning hangovers are mostly non-existent if you drink some water afterwards and stay sober enough to remember the walk home. If you drink to blackout, of course you're going to get a hangover. And hopefully a new liver someday.

      Hmm... It's Tuesday, I don't work tomorrow, and at least one more of the Thug Passion Posse doesn't work tonight. Maybe I should go support my local bartender tonight.

    15. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by fastgood · · Score: 1
      If it doesn't look like a duck, doesn't sound like a duck, and doesn't SMELL like a duck ... it isn't a duck.

      Every time I've had special laptop checks at the International terminals, it has been with snug fitting cases.

      Shoes don't come off until the second check -- makes me think the puffer machine has a little man inside.

    16. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      What? You can still drink in the navy? After they took away the porn from the bases and the local legal prostitutes from off the bases, seemed like a stint in the military wasn't much different from a stint in the big house.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    17. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Ah. That would be Bookers.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    18. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Two shots of Glenfiddich, two shots of water, six rocks.

      Nuff said.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    19. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absinto. Pure. Room temperature.

    20. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by EngMedic · · Score: 1
      --
      filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
    21. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Vreejack · · Score: 1

      I never tried it until I was 35 and fell in love with it. So it looks like I am going to have to smuggle it in now. I'll make better use of it than I did those Cuban cigars. I don't smoke, after all.

      --
      "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
    22. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by zakezuke · · Score: 2

      I realize that Aussies love their vegemite, and Brits love their marmite, but for those of us who didn't grow up eating it, it's a substance worth confiscating at the border.

      That stuff is just nasty. :-P


      I prefer Vegemite to marmite my self, but find it easier to find marmite. I'm quite american... and I enjoy the stuff. It has a beefy character, and does make a fabulious diatary suppliment. As a bonus... it's a sure fire cure for hangovers. Add it to a stew, use it for breakfast, use it for those times where it's not an option to supliment your diet with a good weis beer. If you prefer taking pills... those are ok, but spent yeast is among the top things one should consider having in their diet.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    23. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Twisted64 · · Score: 1

      God help you - between that and the dubbing of Mad Max, I would have declared war on the US long ago, were I in charge of Australia :-/

      --
      Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
    24. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Technician · · Score: 1

      "Sir, we're going to have to confiscate this laptop computer, our highly trained canine has detected the presence of a banned and extremely dangerous substance!"

      Probably secure encryption. Check the US Export controls restricted technology list. Some of my software titles are not for export due to the technology they contain.

      It's laughable. US encryption is a restricted export. The non-US encryption from Isreal isn't too bad.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    25. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by monsted · · Score: 1

      Hold the water, hold the rocks and make it their 18 year Ancient Reserve and you've sold me.

    26. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a brit and I prefer vegemite to marmite.

      My favourite is toast with honey, cream cheese, and topped with vegemite(/marmite). Yum

    27. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I heard being in the Navy only qualified you as being too stupid to be in the Air Force, too limp-wristed to be in the Army, and too sane to be in the Marines.

      Not as an expert in booze.

    28. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by laejoh · · Score: 0
      It's a witch:

      CROWD: Oooh. BEDEVERE: Exactly. So, logically... VILLAGER #1: If... she... weighs... the same as a duck,... she's made of wood. BEDEVERE: And therefore? VILLAGER #2: A witch! VILLAGER #1: A witch! CROWD: A witch! A witch!...
    29. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by TechForensics · · Score: 1

      "I'm addicted to placebos" (Steven Wright?) ..I'd advise you to give them up, but it wouldn't make any difference.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    30. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      You can use the very same algorythms as long as they are from a non US source. Like AES with whatever key length or whatever is currently banned. Just download it from a server outside of the US.

      However you may not be allowed to cross some borders with the actual bits. Even in a tube.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    31. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      It tastes exactly like yellow Triaminic. That's the most disgusting stuff ever.

      On a related note, Absolut Mandarin smells like orange Triaminic. And that's the best-tasting cough medicine ever. Though I'd rather just drink the vodka these days.

    32. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should try mixing Jägermeister with Red Bull instead. :)

    33. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      yes, speaking off illegal immigrants, how many people are NOT descended from the Native Indians on one way or another ? I guess that all of them class as illegal immigrants.

    34. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2

      yes, speaking off illegal immigrants, how many people are NOT descended from the Native Indians on one way or another ? I guess that all of them class as illegal immigrants.

      One could- but one would be incorrect, for three reasons:

      1. The legitimate government at the time of the immigration created specific procedures to admit new immigrants, and the grand majority actually used those procedures to become citizens.
      2. Willingness to accept native cultural items where they made sense: Even by 1776, American bathing and fighting standards were *very* different from our European counterparts because the early settlers learned from the Native Americans how to do it right.
      3. Finally, accepting (legal) immigration itself is a Native American tradition- perhaps a flawed one seeing how many Native Americans are left, but peaceful migration was going on here in the western hemisphere for many moons before the Eurpoeans showed up, and very little of it was without prior approval of the controling government for an area (when it was without prior approval, it was considered an invasion, and such varied tribes as the Souix, the Chinook trading nation, the Nes Pierce, and the Apache would not hesitate to kill those who trespassed without leave of the tribal councils).

      So yes, there is a *big* difference between what is going on today and what went on in the past, and it has everything to do with respect for the people who are already in the country you're emigrating to.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    35. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Ajehals · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting that the US govt is unhappy with "not for export" standard encryption being "imported" *into* the country? :)

    36. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Qualudes and crystal Meth work better

    37. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      What a waste, Jägermeister shouldn't be mixed with anything and sipped not shoot, you've no taste at all.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    38. Re:Beige Alert! Beige Alert in terminal B! by famikon · · Score: 0
      Dude, Tupac would cut you.

      A Thug Passion is one part Alize and one part Cristal.

  2. The REAL truth by Goblez · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is that some Security Guards just want new laptops, and the law provides them plenty of holes to avoid having to answer for it.

    --
    - Kal`Goblez
    1. Re:The REAL truth by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work that way. You should have been modded flamebait instead of interesting.

    2. Re:The REAL truth by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      And why wouldn't they? They need new laptops to use with their shiny new digital cameras, MP3 players, and PDAs which were conveniently removed from luggage.

    3. Re:The REAL truth by Goblez · · Score: 1

      Not supposed to happen that way. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen. There are plenty of things that aren't supposed to be going the way they are, but still are. Take any major political news event of late. If you don't care for a realists view of matters, perhaps you should consider outside viewpoints as something other than 'flamebait'.

      --
      - Kal`Goblez
    4. Re:The REAL truth by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      I bought a Gameboy back when they were new and shiny (1990 I think) on a trip to Europe.

      As flying regulations prohibited electronic interference (now they allow laptops and such, but it wasn't always so), I packed it in my luggage. Of course, it never arrived.

      It must have been stolen at the Brazilian stop, I guess (on my way to my country, Uruguay), but I wouldn't put it past US airport security to steal something...

      PD: also happens with mail sometimes.

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    5. Re:The REAL truth by jimmy+o'leary · · Score: 0

      that is a rather provincial attitude

      i notice you provided nothing substantive to back up your claim

    6. Re:The REAL truth by chortick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. While most police forces are still subject to civilian control, Customs officials in the US and Canada increasingly do not operate transparently. In the absence of clear civilian control, they and all other police forces inevitably descend into corruption and abuse.

      Western police are not immune to this. "Our cops don't do that!"... BS. I don't know why we (westerners) think that we're inherently better human beings than say, Soviet Russian police. Nothing about us makes our societies better, it is our political and economic freedom that has made us better. Define power roles and remove the controls... the "Stanford Prison Experiment" could easily have been a prototype for Abu Ghraib.

      When you consider that Customs officials increasingly don't have to answer to anyone, and there is no longer any useful process of complaint or appeal, it is inevitable that they will abuse their power. After all, you could be a terrorist/communist/anarchist/whatever it was 150 years ago.

      As for customs guards, the fact that you're a business traveller, earn 10x what they do, and that this is the only context in which they will ever have power over you will surely cause them to abuse their authority. This is human nature.

    7. Re:The REAL truth by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      So according to you, the "realists view" is that the government has implemented a new policy to confiscate laptops so that a bunch of security guards will have something to play Quake on. ....

      Ok, where's the camera?

      The basic concept is so stupid I don't know whether to laugh at you or poke you with a stick. Not to mention the type of paranoia it takes to be willing to label an entire industry as nothing but a bunch of thieves. Especially an industry which is dedicated to PROTECTING private property.

      In other words, you're way off base here buds.

    8. Re:The REAL truth by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Western police are not immune to this. "Our cops don't do that!"... BS. I don't know why we (westerners) think that we're inherently better human beings than say, Soviet Russian police.

      IMHO, this is the principle driver behind these problems. The belief that "it can't happen here!" is what invariably leads to it happening due to the level of denial. It also contains copious helpings of "we are better than everyone else", another precursor to many social issues. It's like the 650,000 civilian deaths in Iraq; many people simply do not believe that their own country is capable of doing such things so therefore the study must be wrong. If you ask me, all of this belongs on the same page as holocaust denial and religion. It's a complete failure to accept facts that go against your predisposed beliefs. Often the truth hurts.

    9. Re:The REAL truth by kalirion · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of the TSA.

    10. Re:The REAL truth by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if that 650,000 figure is correct, we, the United States of America, did not kill all those people. Most were killed by other Iraqis, by Syrians, by Lebanese, by Jordanians.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:The REAL truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a trick: if they're really overworked then they care more about processing you quickly than about abusing you.

    12. Re:The REAL truth by gowen · · Score: 1

      Mao didn't kill all those guys either.
      Mainly it was typhus and starvation, so in that respect it was basically the fault of their own immune systems.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    13. Re:The REAL truth by jafac · · Score: 1

      Even if that 650,000 figure is correct, we, the United States of America, did not kill all those people. Most were killed by other Iraqis, by Syrians, by Lebanese, by Jordanians.

      The Iraqis, Syrians, and Lebanese (and others) did not dismantle their entire infrastructure for maintaining civil order, and leave it broken. The US did. Bremer did. Against the strong protest of the UN, the US State Department, and pretty much everyone in the world with half a brain.

      The feeble attempts at rebuilding such an infrastructure have failed miserably, because at every turn, they've been infiltrated by militias, death squads, jihadists, and insurgents. The country is in chaos, and the ONLY potential solution is from 500k to a million peace keepers. The longer this solution is delayed, the worse the problem gets. There was a chance, early on in the conflict, for the US to remedy this situation, but Rumsfeld and Bush denied that there was a troop shortage, and refused to admit they had made a mistake, because they wanted to hold onto their power. As a result, 650,000 innocent civilians are dead. But I'm sure glad that our President didn't have to admit he was wrong prior to the 2004 election. Because surely, he will eventually have to admit it, and he has shown some recent signs of doing so, with regard to the change in the "stay the course" rhetoric to the "adapt to win" rhetoric - the only problem is, they don't have the political capital to get this job done right anymore. So more people are going to be killed by this unnecessary fiasco of a war.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:The REAL truth by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Even if that 650,000 figure is correct, we, the United States of America, did not kill all those people. Most were killed by other Iraqis, by Syrians, by Lebanese, by Jordanians.

      Sorry, but no. The numbers reflect the additional deaths occuring over the baseline death rate before the war. If the war had not happened, they would be alive. This figure is the point of this kind of study. Everything seen in Iraq was predicted by anyone who had even a rudamentary knowledge in the history of warfare or middle eastern culture. You were warned that this would happen and the response of your leaders was "we'll be treated as liberators". Why do you think many of us were so angry and "anti-American" in the lead up to the war?

      The deaths are 100% on your hands. The techniques used are the same ones that our leaders have no problem referencing for other civil wars, such as Darfur. Many of them simply reflect the complete and utter lack of a healthcare system. That's a lot of childbirths gone wrong. It's a lot of RTA's. It's a lot of murders and ethnic cleansing caused by the lack of a coherent police force or military. It's a lot of completely preventable deaths that would not have occured should the invasion not happened.

      You have only two excuses here for this mess. Historical ignorance and/or stupidity. Pick one of them, don't try to blame others.

    15. Re:The REAL truth by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I used to sell car stereos at the flea market, there was one guy who would buy one every week! One day I followed him out to the parking lot and he was installing it into his motorcycle to take into Canada without declairing it, and that's right he worked for Canadian Customs

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    16. Re:The REAL truth by Goblez · · Score: 1

      See the reply to the post above yours. I think this adequetly speaks to what I had in mind when I posted this (though does go into further detail of the erosions of our freedom). But basically, I'm not grouping all security guards as theives, nor do I even imply this, but I am saying that some people are going to take advantage of it for their own means. And, as I stated above, if you don't think so then I think that you are being naive.

      --
      - Kal`Goblez
    17. Re:The REAL truth by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Ohhh, you don't say! Some people are going to take advantage of it. Wow. That's the most insightful thing I've ever read! I would have NEVER thought of that on my own.

      On the other hand, how exactly that says anything either positive or negative about the law is beyond my ability to comprehend. Perhaps you're just entirely too clever for me, but I fail to see how a few criminals abusing their authority in any way, shape, or form either validates or invalidates any given law.

      Your statement is equivalent to stating that some police are liable to use their government-issued sidearms to commit murder. It's a pointless statement of fact that does nothing to either validate or invalidate the issuing of weapons to police officers. Both your statement and my analogy are statements of facts which should be obvious to everyone, as well as being examples of an individual using a totally irrelevant comment to slyly imply that the issue being discussed is a bad idea. It's a dishonest way to cast aspersion on your opposition.

  3. Sounds like a job for... by QCompson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Captain Encryption!

    1. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, you'll just git in troubl' if'n you try 'n get smart with en-cryption. All ya gotta do to hide a laptop is this: stand up!

    2. Re:Sounds like a job for... by failure-man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes but, can Captain Encryption get me my computer back?
       
      Better yet, can Captain Encryption keep the G-men from stealing it in the first place?

    3. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Security 1 Constitution 0

      I wonder if you refuse to give them your login or if they find you are using whole drive encryption that this will automatically get your laptop seized. How is a border agent supposed to distinguish between trying to protect his or her private data versus someone trying to use encryption to to hide something. I'm glad I don't have to decide....

      Next stop Google: Search = whole disk encryption

    4. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me that encrypting your laptop or placing other obvious obstacles in it is a sure-way to get it impounded...

      More likely i would suggest that when the airport guard asks you to turn it on, you boot it into a default installation of windows xp, with a few excel and powerpoint files in the desktop...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    5. Re:Sounds like a job for... by lostngone · · Score: 0

      Sure the encryption will work but you can kiss your laptop goodbye forever. I know people in the U.S. that have had non-illegal items confiscated and either never charged with anything or the charges dropped and have never had the items returned. The Federal Government simply says No, your not getting your property back take it up with our lawyers.

    6. Re:Sounds like a job for... by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      With lots of spyware so it takes a long time to come up,
      and is basically unusable.

      They'll move you along quickly with your piece of junk.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    7. Re:Sounds like a job for... by alx5000 · · Score: 1

      You seem to be understimating the imagination of the GP poster...

      --
      My 0.02 cents
    8. Re:Sounds like a job for... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      If that guy from Half-Life steals your laptop, there are more important things than encryption.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    9. Re:Sounds like a job for... by dan828 · · Score: 1

      Security 1 Constitution 0

      IANAL, but the right to search and seizure without warrant has been around under certain cases since the inception of the country, and is not unconstitutional. The Coast Guard and the Treasury Department (the CG used to be part of the Treasury dept, later Transportation, and now Homeland Security) are two agencies that, under certain circumstances, search and seize without warrant, probable cause, or any other justification required. There is a long precident for this, and legislation reguarding goes back to the first congress.

    10. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's no way it's coming out of that mysterious briefcase once it ends up in there!

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    11. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Samari711 · · Score: 1

      Actually Captain Encryption is WHY your laptop is likely to be seized in the first place. Encryption software is deemed a munition by the State Department and requires permission to be exported. Waivers are pretty easy to come by but most people don't realize that even the encryption algorithims in wireless card drivers are export controlled.

      --

      I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

    12. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Spot on. Alexander Hamilton, first Secretary of the Treasury, made the Coast Guard the cornerstone of his plan for collecting revenues. There's even an urban legend that the Coast Guard 'Cutters' (first boats commissioned by the U.S.) were to fight 'revenue cutters'.
      Because this was part of international commerce, it was outside the protection of domestic rights.
      Another example of this is how enemy combatants are typically not covered under domestic rights such as right to a lawyer, speedy trial, habeas corpus, etc. Somehow, this has been forgotten or ignored recently.

      (Of course, I'm sure /.groupthink will mod me for speaking truth, but then, what else is new?)

    13. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      IANAL, but the right to search and seizure without warrant has been around under certain cases since the inception of the country, and is not unconstitutional.

      Any search of an American citizen's person, house, papers, or effects without a proper warrant is unconstitutional. Illiterate courts and historical precedent don't change that.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    14. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Historical truth without references isn't worth much.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    15. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, laptops at my work are required, by DHS, to have encryption software on them. Can't wait until one of our VIP's has his machine confiscated.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    16. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative
      Because this was part of international commerce, it was outside the protection of domestic rights.

      There is no "international commerce" exception to the Bill of Rights mentioned in the Constitution.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    17. Re:Sounds like a job for... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Encryption software is deemed a munition by the State Department and requires permission to be exported.

      Yeah, and that sure explains why laptops are being seized when their owners are coming into the country!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    18. Re:Sounds like a job for... by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      I thought that ban was all but lifted was it not? I don't see the big furore about exporting PGP anymore. My mind is slightly fuzzy on the details, perhaps Phillip got a license to export it. It was probably IDEA or something hindering it, but I was sure that the ban on crypto export had been lifted to a small degree. Anyone?

    19. Re:Sounds like a job for... by navarroj · · Score: 1

      LOL. I wish I had mod points

    20. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of the Whiskey Rebellion?
      Where does the Constitution say that the Treasury Department can raise an army against Pennsylvania farmers?

    21. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Where does the Constitution say that the Treasury Department can raise an army against Pennsylvania farmers?

      Article I, Section 8: "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions". Now, what does that have to do with international commerce?

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    22. Re:Sounds like a job for... by dan828 · · Score: 1

      Enjoy a bit of reading:
      http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/am endment04/03.html#5
      http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/ amendment04/04.html#2
      By definition, whether you like it or not, a ruling by the Supreme Court is constitutional.

    23. Re:Sounds like a job for... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      By definition, whether you like it or not, a ruling by the Supreme Court is constitutional.

      No. By defintion, a ruling in concert with the text of the Constitution is constitutional, and a ruling which is not so in concert is unconstitutional. That's why the word "constitution", not "court", is the root of "constitutional".

      If the Congress enacted a law declaring Fundamentalist Zoroastorianism the state religion, the POTUS signed it, and the SCOTUS stamped it OK, that law would still be unconstitutional.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  4. What happens to them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, are these laptops auctioned off by the government?

    1. Re:What happens to them? by popeye44 · · Score: 1

      It would be in my experience to say yes, they are auctioned off. However at the current pace of most state and federal govt's the current laptops on auction are likely running windows 95.. so don't get yer hopes too high on getting a bling'd out xps laptop haha. Seriously, you can find good deals however some of the agencies are extremely horrid about getting rid of stuff in a timely manner.

      --
      Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
    2. Re:What happens to them? by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      They're probably auctioned off, but also probably crippled - I went to an US Embassy auction of office PCs... even though they were of the lowest level of security, they had taken out the HD and RAM memory, but looked ok on the outside.

      Some people with no computer knowledge thought they were getting the full deal and overbid horribly... I tried telling one that they weren't "complete pc's" but he thought I was trying to get them cheap, I guess.

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  5. Search Where? by gt_mattex · · Score: 0

    What do yo mean you need to search for a laptop?

    You need to search where?

    That doesn't even make sense!

    AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

    *cries in corner*

    --
    "No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture." - Learned Hand
    1. Re:Search Where? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > What do yo mean you need to search for a laptop?
      > You need to search where?
      > That doesn't even make sense!

      It does, for a USB thumbdrive.

      ~wavy lines, a bombed-out shack in post-Civil-War-II America~

      This USB keychain I got here was first purchased by your great-grandfather to hold pictures he took during the First Gulf War. It was bought in a Best Buy in Knoxville, Tennessee. Made by the first company to ever make USB thumbdrives. Up till then people just carried floppy disks that was read by magnets. It was bought by private Doughboy Ernie Coolidge on the day he set sail for Iraq. It was your great-grandfather's USB thumbdrive and he carried it everyday he was in that war.

      When he had done his duty, he went home to your great-grandmother, took the thumbdrive out of his pocket, put it an empty dresser drawer, and in that can it stayed 'til your granddad Dane Coolidge was called upon by his country to go overseas and fight the Ay-rabs once again. This time they called it The First Global War On Terror. Your great-grandfather gave this watch to your granddad for good luck. Unfortunately, Dane's luck wasn't as good as his old man's. Dane was a Marine and he was killed -- along with the other Marines at the battle of Baghdad. Your granddad was facing death, he knew it. None of those boys had any illusions about ever leavin' the Green Zone alive. So three days before the Ay-rabs retook the Green Zone, your granddad asked a gunner on an Air Force transport name of Winocki, a man he had never met before in his life, to deliver to his infant son, who he'd never seen in the flesh, his USB thumbdrive. Three days later, your granddad was dead.

      But Winocki kept his word. After the First Global War on Terror was over, he paid a visit to your grandmother, delivering to your infant father, his Dad's USB thumbdrive. This thumbdrive.

      This thumbdrive was in Daddy's pocket during the Second Civil War when he was flyin' to Canada. He was captured at the airport, which was a place that was sorta like bein' in a Halliburton prison camp. He knew if the TSA ever saw the thumbdrive it'd be confiscated, taken away. The way your Dad looked at it, that thumbdrive was your birthright. He'd be damned if any bureaucrats were gonna put their greasy hands on his boy's birthright.

      So he hid it in the one place he knew he could hide something. His ass. Five long hours, he wore this thumbdrive up his ass. Then he died of a perforated colon, but before he did he gave me the thumbdrive. I hid this uncomfortable hunk of plastic and silicon up my ass two more hours. Then, after a total of seven hours in secondary inspection, I was sent on home to my family. And now, little man, I give the watch to you.

      - With apologies to Tarantino

    2. Re:Search Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed one instance of "watch."

    3. Re:Search Where? by benicillin · · Score: 1
      haha yeah, should have run yourself a nice find - replace to clear that one up...
      Your great-grandfather gave this watch to your granddad for good luck.
      --
      "i stand on the edge of destruction" -shai hulud
    4. Re:Search Where? by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      MOre than one...."And now, little man, I give the watch to you"

    5. Re:Search Where? by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      Very good. I thought you were referncing Papillon, however... seems like that's where Tarantino got his inspiration, I guess (never saw Pulp Fiction).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papillon_(autobiograp hy)

      I didn't find the reference there, but I did here:

      http://www.anc.org.za/books/escape4.html

      "In Papillon the convicts hid their money up their anuses in what they called 'chargers'. These were metal tubes with screw-on lids in which the money was rolled and inserted."

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    6. Re:Search Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bunch of men go through all that trouble to hide a USB thumbdrive and in the end the boy gets a WATCH?

    7. Re:Search Where? by gold23 · · Score: 1

      "Of course, your grand-dad, Dan Coolidge, had already erased all the First Gulf War pics, and loaded it up with porn for his stint in Anti-Terror War I. So here you go -- enjoy some 50-year-old porn."

      --
      Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
    8. Re:Search Where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I give the watch to you.

      Hey, where's my thumbdrive?

  6. hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I crossed the border twice on Sunday. They didn't care about my laptop. There's your anecdotal evidence.

    1. Re:hmmm. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

      I crossed the border twice on Sunday. They didn't care about my laptop. There's your anecdotal evidence.

      Years ago, on a ski trip to Searchmont (in Canada near the Soo*) a friend and I were returning to the US and had pulled into US Customs. "Are you bringing anything into the country?" "Um.. just these doughnuts"

      Bad. Very bad. They nearly tore the car apart (apparently looking for more doughnuts.)

      Still a sore point to this day when I visit my friend and his wife and go to Canada. "Do not mention doughnuts!"

      *Sault Saint Marie

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I crossed at I-5/99 at Blaine,WA/White Rock,BC.

    3. Re:hmmm. by really? · · Score: 1

      Couple months ago I was turned back because I had "too many small screwdrivers", and I looked "smart enough to use them". I am NOT making this up.

      I was driving across ...

      BG: What do you do?
      Me: I am a network engineer in Tokyo
      BG: So you work with computers.
      Me: Sometimes.
      BG: You have a lot of tools.
      Me: I drive a 20 year old car ... carrying tools is the smart thing to do.
      BG: You have to many small screwdrivers.
      Me: Huh?
      BG: You could use these to work on computers with.
      Me: I am a network guy, I do software.
      BG: You look smart enough that you could fix hardware.
      Me: Huh?

      Of course, the next day, after having thrown all my tools from the nice aluminium case they are usually packed in into a canvas bag, I crossed without any major issues.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    4. Re:hmmm. by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      Still a sore point to this day when I visit my friend and his wife and go to Canada. "Do not mention doughnuts!"

      The US gave us Krispy Kreme, and we gave you Tim Horton's. You hosed us again!

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    5. Re:hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I crossed the border twice on Sunday. They didn't care about my laptop. There's your anecdotal evidence.
      Yeah, but you're an Anonymous Coward. You can't trust anything coming from an Anonymous Coward.
    6. Re:hmmm. by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      The US gave us Krispy Kreme, and we gave you Tim Horton's. You hosed us again!

      What we had in the car were Tim Horton's Apple Fritters. They used to be legendarily delicious, before the chain was bought out and the recipe changed. I haven't been to a TH's since. :-(

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:hmmm. by HappyHead · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Why'd they have to screw up all of the donuts, anyways?
      It's worse what they did to the boxes though - you used to be able to get a box of a dozen donuts and hold it in one hand. now you need at least two hands (usually more) to stop the stupid thing from folding and falling apart. Timmie's should _not_ have tried to emulate Krispy Kreeme - all of the KK's around here went out of business after a year because the novelty of donuts made of 90% sugar wore off, and people quit going there.
      Now we mostly just complain about how Tim Hortons went downhill when they changed things.

    8. Re:hmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do not mention doughnuts!" The first rule of doughnuts is: you do not mention doughnuts.

  7. hard drive encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is why you should encrypt your hard drive. The French and Israeli intelligence services have been stealing laptops from hotels and airports for years. They take them, image them, then return them to the owner without them knowing that they were taken at all.

    1. Re:hard drive encryption by pixel_bc · · Score: 1

      What kind of moron would check his laptop?

    2. Re:hard drive encryption by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "This is why you should encrypt your hard drive."
      That is why I should have stuff that matters on encrypted on removable media like a CF card or USB key, and nothing of even potential interest on the hard disk.
      The only loss when a laptop is confiscated or stolen should be....the laptop.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:hard drive encryption by legoburner · · Score: 1

      I agree. My laptop (and I think all laptops) should be thought of as temporary anyway. A laptop hard drive is not redundant and can die at any time, taking anything on the laptop with it. A USB key or CF card is a good way to offset any personal data (/home) and the laptop can just be used for general non-essential storage (music, some TV to watch when away on business, etc). If my laptop was confiscated, I would only need to find another computer with a bootable CD drive for knoppix and a USB socket and I could be up and running quickly. I moved to this setup after an annoying hard drive death on a laptop lost me 3 days of rebuilding and reinstalling (gentoo user to make things worse!) and would recommend it to anyone for flexibility. Putting VMware images on the USB stick is also rather useful if expensive.

  8. Required to enter your password? by sith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My laptop requires a password to wake from sleep or decrypt the contents of my home directory. Since this is seemingly not a search-warrant situation, am I in any way legally required to type / provide my password? What are they (legally at least) able to do if I refuse?

    1. Re:Required to enter your password? by jmv · · Score: 5, Informative

      What are they (legally at least) able to do if I refuse?

      In the US? Probably confiscate your laptop, bang you on the head with it and send you off to Guantanamo for sleep deprivation and beatings. But anything else would be considered abusive and thus forbidden by law.

    2. Re:Required to enter your password? by joebp · · Score: 5, Funny

      What are you trying to hide? Why do you hate freedom!?

    3. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably just declare you an enemy combatant, I'm sure the laptop will be safe though.

    4. Re:Required to enter your password? by ebunga · · Score: 1

      Well, you sir, are obviously a terrorist. If you're not a terrorist, then you have nothing to hide. Why do you hate America?

    5. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      What are they (legally at least) able to do if I refuse?
      Anal probing.
    6. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Customs!!!!
      They don't need a search warrant. Never have.
      Didn't need one during FDR. Didn't need one during Lincoln. Didn't need one during Monroe. Didn't need one during Washington. And while we are at it, didn't need one during Queen Elizabeth I.

      The 4th Amend doesn't apply when crossing the border.

    7. Re:Required to enter your password? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      They detain you for hindering an investigation and put you under suspicion for the rest of your life, once they do finally release you.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    8. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My laptop requires a password to wake from sleep or decrypt the contents of my home directory. Since this is seemingly not a search-warrant situation, am I in any way legally required to type / provide my password? What are they (legally at least) able to do if I refuse?

      If you are a US citizen I suppose the US criminal code and possibly anti terrorist legislation act apply. If you are not a US citizen they can pretty much do whatever they bloody well want with the worst case scenario being that you get dragged into a Learjet sporting a fake civil registration which flies you to some US allied country in the Middle East or one of those covert jails in E-Europe for 'harsh interrogation'.

    9. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      i rofled

    10. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of claiming that your laptop requires a password to decrypt the contents of your home directory, why don't you claim that the machine returns "wrong password" whatever you type in? As far as I know there is no law against traveling with something pricey and useless.

    11. Re:Required to enter your password? by bwd · · Score: 1

      You have NO 4th Amendment rights when being searched at the border. The Supreme Court has held in every case before the bench, such as Hernandez and Ickes, that warrantless searches are an inherent sovereign right of the country.

      With that said, your 5th Amendment right to not incriminate yourself by providing a password has never been abrogated by the Court as it pertains to border searches.

    12. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't need a search warrant. Never have. ... The 4th Amend doesn't apply when crossing the border.

      That's certainly the case now but I'm not sure about the "never have" part. Back when the US Constitution was written, the USA didn't really have the kind of guarded border that exists now. I suppose there might have been some form of customs inspections, though.

      It's interesting that the 4th amendment doesn't mention border crossings (and citizenship, for that matter). In particular, it would be interesting to know whether the founding fathers intended for border crossings and (lack of) citizenship to be used so aggressively to deny people rights that they would otherwise have.

    13. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they it meant the same thing when the founders wrote the Constitution.
      I am currently reading a book about piracy in New Orleans during the War of 1812. Back when the founders were still alive and in charge. Customs worked similarly to today.

    14. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In answer to your question a US judge ruled that US customs can search all contents of a laptop without a warrant and if you refuse to supply passwords to the information you go to jail.

      All because of this case afaik.
      http://news.com.com/2100-1030_3-6098939.html

    15. Re:Required to enter your password? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      That's certainly the case now but I'm not sure about the "never have" part. Back when the US Constitution was written, the USA didn't really have the kind of guarded border that exists now. I suppose there might have been some form of customs inspections, though.

      And they paid like hell for it in 1812- when a bunch of Canadians came down and burned the White House. Ever since we've had a guarded border to the north. A similar thing happened when a gangster thug by the name of Pancho Villa came across the southern border a half century later. Unguarded borders are a damned bad idea- and we've lost that bit of wisdom recently.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    16. Re:Required to enter your password? by 0racle · · Score: 1

      The British burned down the White House, not Canadians.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    17. Re:Required to enter your password? by Entrope · · Score: 4, Informative

      Border agents need probable cause for highly invasive searches that "implicate dignity and privacy interests" (US v Flores-Montano). As you imply, this gives border agents much more leeway than most US law enforcement officers, but even within the country's borders, police officers can perform warrantless searches based on probable cause or when it is incident to arrest. So the Fourth Amendment does apply when crossing the border, but its protections are lower there due to a different balance of interests than applies inside the country.

      The article at least mentions the two recent apposite federal cases, if not by name (Romm and Arnold). If the judge's ruling in US v Arnold is upheld on appeal, the circuit split between 9th and 5th circuits will probably lead the Supreme Court to address the question. I hope -- against hope, given the presence of usually big-government and usually pro-security justices -- that they would agree with the California judge in saying that laptop searches do implicate dignity and privacy interests.

    18. Re:Required to enter your password? by spiritgreywolf · · Score: 1

      I wonder if there will ever be an open-source variety of SecurID key fob (and maybe 1 authorized backup) for disk-based encryption for laptops? You know, those things that changes digits every minute that you use when entering a known passcode to access remote VPN systems. I can envision shipping my SecureID-like key tag via fed-ex or other to my destination and taking the laptop with me.

      They can ask me to open it up all they want and I physically would be unable to help them.

      More likely I would just do what I do now - Run Linux and use Windows under a virtual machine that is stored in an encrypted file volume. I do this because most of the healthcare tools I use are windows-based and I have some Protected Health Information (PHI) in the image - it's almost impossible not to when trying to debug production systems. I found it was far easier to do this and keep the virtual machine up to date with patches, etc., and never surf with it or use it for anything other than 100% business use. I have another XP image that has all of my other business (and non-PHI) email, etc. on it so never the twain shall meet - until someone has a virus that can use Linux to bridge across 2 VM's where they never both run at the same time.

      I used to be a Republican when excessive tax was more of a worry than the complete and total fsking erosion of my rights as a citizen.

      Being a citizen now only means they have the option to use lube when they probe you. Note that I said it's just an option - not a right. You poor bastards coming in from beyond the border get the dry probe regardless. You have my sympathies...

      --
      Never have a philosophy which supports a lack of courage
    19. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to upgrade to Firefox 2.0 if you're just using a typewriter!

    20. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadians were British then.

    21. Re:Required to enter your password? by toddhisattva · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't need to enter a password or cooperate in any way.

      And possibly, you will be seen as having no need to enter the country.

      The way to get your laptop across the border is to pack it in cocaine.

    22. Re:Required to enter your password? by _KiTA_ · · Score: 5, Informative
      What are they (legally at least) able to do if I refuse?


      In the United States, I presume?

      Well, the current law that Bush and his rubber stamps passed allow them to arrest you, hold you indefinately without a trial, rape you (injuries during torture up to but not including death are perfectly OK -- Rape is perfectly acceptabe under the word of the law and has already went on at Abu Ghraib), and prohibit you any contact with any outside sources.

      Forever.

      According to current law, they could make you disappear, and you'd spend the next 50 years in solitary confinement, only being let out long enough to torture for your password. Of course, having given said password, they would just throw you back in and forget about you. You have no rights to a lawyer, no rights to contest your confinement (this is what Haebus Corpus is all about. It was one of the cornerstones of our society, and the founding fathers assumed that no one would be stupid enough to ever try to overturn it -- nor none of their decendants stupid enough to accept it).

      Essentually, no rights at all, since they can simply lock you up and you CANNOT FIGHT IT if they do not want to let you. Want to use your 1st Amendment rights to free speech? Sorry, you can't because you're behind bars in some secret European prison. All other rights are trumped by the loss of the right to contest your imprisonment.

      (BTW, think it only applies to "brown people" like Jose Padilla or random "Terrorists"? Think again -- the law SPECIFICALLY STATES that it applies to US Citizens.)

      If your family protested, they'd either be arrested too, or simply ignored, or the government, when needing a political football, would make something up about you -- like what they did with Mr. Padilla, who they originally accused of having plans of blowing up a dirty bomb in the US. 4 years later, they've never bothered to charge him with that, only even bothering to charge him with anything when he got thiiiis close to getting the US ruled out of line for it. (He's currently being held, still without trial, for "conspiracy to murder, kidnap, and maim people overseas.")

      Pardon me for waxing political, but... I felt this was important, since there's not NEARLY enough outrage going on about this.
    23. Re:Required to enter your password? by bky1701 · · Score: 2

      Just remember: smile and yell in "pleasure". It'll get some guards sent to a psychologist, maybe even scar them for life!

    24. Re:Required to enter your password? by telso · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In Canada, US Customs agents falls under the direction of Canadian laws, specifically the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Preclearnace Act. Specifically:

      16. (1) If the traveller chooses to answer any question that is asked by a preclearance officer for preclearance purposes, the traveller must answer truthfully.
      (2) If the traveller refuses to answer any question asked for preclearance purposes, the preclearance officer may order the traveller to leave the preclearance area.
      (3) The refusal by a traveller to answer any question asked by a preclearance officer does not in and of itself constitute reasonable grounds for the officer to suspect that a search of the traveller is necessary for the purposes of this Act or that an offence has been committed under section 33 or 34.

      Also:
      25. (1) A preclearance officer may examine any goods that are submitted for preclearance, and may open or cause to be opened any package or container and take samples of the goods in reasonable amounts.

      So they are allowed to "examine" your laptop and although you might be able to refuse to answer a question like "What is your password?", if you do they can refuse you entry into the US. However, in general, while your goods may be refused entry, confiscated or even forfeited (the Governor-in-Council regulations on that are harder to find, but likely out there somewhere), you may always leave a preclearance area unless they suspect you of breaking Canadian law (or if you have broken it). Also, they can't search you once you state you want to leave, unless they suspect you of breaking Canadian law (or if you have broken it). Lastly, IANAL and there are lots more interesting things there.
    25. Re:Required to enter your password? by cheshire_cqx · · Score: 1

      Border search exception to the warrant requirement.

      RTFO (read the filed opinion).

      http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/D4 958BAAF34B2292882571B500580F96/$file/0410648.pdf?o penelement

    26. Re:Required to enter your password? by Marty200 · · Score: 1


      My laptop requires a password to wake from sleep or decrypt the contents of my home directory. Since this is seemingly not a search-warrant situation, am I in any way legally required to type / provide my password? What are they (legally at least) able to do if I refuse?


      If you aren't an american citizen they could probably refuse you entry into the country. I've heard of people refusing searches at airports and being told to turn around and go home.

      MG

      --

      Randomly distributing Karma whenever possible.

    27. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The situation when crossing the border may be diffrent, but under normal criminal procedings you can't be charged with anything or compelled to share the password to your computer. All you have to do is give the machine to them, and if they can't crack the encryption they're up shit creek.

      There was a story in the local newspaper about this recently (can't remember if it was a national thing though, forget what section it was in) about a guy who was trying to get prosecuters to get him a deal if he would reveal the password to his computer (which they couldn't crack) and let them at the inciminating stuff inside.

    28. Re:Required to enter your password? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      What are you trying to hide? Why do you hate freedom!?

      Think of the children! For goodness sakes, what about THE CHILDREN??!

    29. Re:Required to enter your password? by necro81 · · Score: 1

      As the article points out, the real problem is that the border is a weird place, legally speaking. The area between the gate and when you clear customs is not technically speaking a part of the united states; U.S. law doesn't always apply. Particularly with regards to security, customs, immigration, etc., the law is essentially what the border guards claim it to be. If they want to hold you for hours or days because you refuse to unlock your computer - you may have no recourse against that, especially if you are not a U.S. citizen. If they want to confiscate your computer to let their own crackers and forsensics folks tear it apart, there likewise is very little you can do.

    30. Re:Required to enter your password? by cheshire_cqx · · Score: 1

      Here's an interesting update from yesterday.

      http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=116133511831 8

      Government officials must have reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment to search someone's laptop at U.S. borders, according to a recent ruling in Los Angeles.

      The decision by U.S. District Judge Dean D. Pregerson of the Central District of California is the first within the area of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to address whether searching a person's laptop is more than routine and therefore subject to the search and seizure protections of the Fourth Amendment. U.S. v. Arnold, No. 2:05-cr-00772 (C.D. Calif.).

      The Oct. 2 ruling expands upon a previous decision by the 9th Circuit that permitted the search of temporary cache files in a man's laptop. U.S. v. Romm, 455 F. 3d 990 (9th Cir. 2006). The decision could lead to a potential circuit split, given a conflicting 4th Circuit ruling last year in a similar case.

    31. Re:Required to enter your password? by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Dang, that's funny.

      I just realized that for all that right wing USA neo-cons claim to hate the French, those neo-cons and their lapdogs have just re-invented the oubliette. I guess they must be Freedom oubliettes.

      P-A

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    32. Re:Required to enter your password? by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      You know, the far more likely thing is if you refuse then they'll just say no and turn you away. Infinitely more likely than an anal probing. Unless the guy gets off on it.

    33. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They will turn you away prehaps if you are in a country other then the US, however ignoring the recent ruling where a US judge greenlighted this the US have been detaining people in airports without rights for years. They claim the land isn't US soil so US laws don't apply.

    34. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pardon me for waxing political, but... I felt this was important, since there's not NEARLY enough outrage going on about this.

      Same with John Walker Lindt, the American Taliban guy. They never did charge him with any terrorism-related charge. In the end, they dropped all such charges, then threatened him with some silly-ass thing like obstruction. Good for 40 years. Then, to avoid going to trial, they got him to plead guilty for a reduction to 20 years. There was a Saudi guy with him when he was taken. The only difference was that Lindt was holding a rifle. In the end, they simply deported the Saudi guy back home, apparently with no conditions like standing trial, doing time or anything else once he got there.

      I tried to bring this up with a friend who is a lawyer. He has a son who's a marine captain and has been in Afghanistan and is now in Iraq. I hardly had five words out of my mouth when I was dismissed with, "It's all his own fault -- he shouldn't have lied to the CIA and thus endangered other Americans." I decided not to pursue the issue with him because I don't see any percentage in pissing into the wind.

      This lawyer is not a dummy. He graduated with honors in English, then got married and went through a respected law school at night while holding down a day job with a major American corporation. Yet, this is what he comes up with, likely because his son is involved. Too bad he doesn't have the integrity to seek, or at least listen to, the truth.

    35. Re:Required to enter your password? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      he is a knowledgable dummy then because he doesnt seek the truth. Money corrupts!

      We'll see a different result when he is 75 yo

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    36. Re:Required to enter your password? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      They call it rendition nowadays... Or "extraordinary rendition".

      --
    37. Re:Required to enter your password? by Holmwood · · Score: 1
      a bunch of Canadians came down and burned the White House

      One shouldn't suggest the Canadians (or British) came out of nowhere to burn Washington. The Americans (very unwisely) started the burnings of towns: first York (now Toronto) in April 1812. At least that was in springtime, though, and mostly public buildings were burned, along with some houses. A year and a half later, in December 1813, US forces under Gen. McClure burned Newark, Ontario (now Niagara-on-the-Lake):

      When he decided to withdraw. McClure compounded his earlier errors by ordering the village of Newark (now Niagara-on-the-Lake) burned ... McClure. after giving the inhabitants only a few hours warning ordered the whole village of some 150 houses put to the torch. [he forced] the inhabitants -- mostly women and children, since the men were away in the army -- out into the snow and bitter cold of a mid-December night...
      (http://freenet.buffalo.edu/bah/h/war1812/bowler .html

      Needless to say the British -- or proto-Canadians if you prefer -- were unimpressed, and vowed vengeance. Starting on the 19th of December, they overran Fort Niagara, destroyed Lewiston, and burned Manchester (Niagara Falls, NY), Schlosser, Black Rock and Buffalo.

      Even the Americans blamed McClure for the outcome.

      Some months later in 1814, the British revenged themselves for the burning of York. In a controlled and disciplined operation, (unlike the brutalities along the Niagara frontier), public buildings in Washington, DC were burned, with most residences and businesses surviving.

      So controlled borders are probably an even better thing for Canadians, judging simply by history.

      Of course, maybe not so good a thing for the safety and sanctity of your laptop, hard drive and data.

      Holmwood
    38. Re:Required to enter your password? by smchris · · Score: 1

      If you are not a US citizen they can pretty much do whatever they bloody well want with the worst case scenario being that you get dragged into a Learjet sporting a fake civil registration which flies you to some US allied country in the Middle East or one of those covert jails in E-Europe

      It's hard to keep up. With the new Military Act of a couple weeks back U.S. citizens can be shipped out for indefinite approved "non-tortures" too.

      It's just a question of getting the executive commission in place and the channels set up so they can be funneled the names of Americans to be labeled "combattents" for material contribution.

    39. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it just me or is it worrying that parent got modded "informative"?

      I'd HOPE they were shooting for Funny, but America is a fucked up country...

    40. Re:Required to enter your password? by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      Think again -- the law SPECIFICALLY STATES that it applies to US Citizens.

      Could you please cite that portion? I can't find it.
    41. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My understanding is that your hard drive area is opaque to x-ray so they make you turn it on to show that you have a hard drive instead of a bomb in there. Unless there's something going on that I've never had the pleasure to witness, as long as you turn it on I doubt there will be any problems.

    42. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miniluv is there to help.
      Recall the three slogans.

    43. Re:Required to enter your password? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The British burned down the White House, not Canadians.

      At that point in history, they were one and the same- it was a battle for what the borders of the United States would be, particularily the Northern Border.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    44. Re:Required to enter your password? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Good fences make for good neighbors- Or at least, that's been my experience.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    45. Re:Required to enter your password? by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      A similar thing happened when a gangster thug by the name of Pancho Villa came across the southern border a half century later.
      You obviously don't know history as well as you think you do. Pancho Villa was a General in charge of revolutionary troops in the northern part of Mexico. George Washington was a General in charge of revolutionary troops in the U.S. If Pancho Villa was a "gangster thug" then George Washington was one too...
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    46. Re:Required to enter your password? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't know history as well as you think you do. Pancho Villa was a General in charge of revolutionary troops in the northern part of Mexico. George Washington was a General in charge of revolutionary troops in the U.S. If Pancho Villa was a "gangster thug" then George Washington was one too...

      I'll agree with that outright. Both were agents of the concept of totalitarian agriculture. Of course, George Washington's tactics were a bit different- he was smart enough to stay on his own soil instead of invading other countries.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    47. Re:Required to enter your password? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, when you really have to dispose of hot merchandise, or have a hankering for a slightly used heavily discounted television set in the wee hours of the morning, good fences make great neighbors.

  9. it isn't just the USA that does this... by david_bonn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Canadian Customs has "searched" my laptop twice. Once I sat at the border for about four hours while the tried to figure out how to use the finder. U.S. customs took my laptop (a MacBook Pro) out of the case and looked at it, but I think they decided they didn't want to spend the time with it.

    I shudder at how long it would take the good customs folks to work their way through a Linux box, or a decently encrypted hard drive.

    In both of the Canadian searches, I was asked questions specifically based on email messages cached in my mail client. That was awful disturbing.
    In the "long search" case they apparently also spent most of their time browsing the iPhoto and Photoshop albums and asked me a lot of questions about other places I had been.

    1. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear, right? At least that's what the horde of Bushbots will tell you, once the Freepers catch the pheromonal trail of this thread.

    2. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that is why I don't bring my laptop on international flights.

    3. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I was asked questions specifically based on email messages cached in my mail client

      Why didn't you file a complaint?

    4. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you happen to be a jew, or homosexual, or a gypsy, and this is still 1934....

    5. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They're just stalling. They're not interested in your laptop per se, more in your reaction to having your laptop studied.

    6. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

      "In the "long search" case they apparently also spent most of their time browsing the iPhoto and Photoshop albums and asked me a lot of questions about other places I had been."

      That's good to know, for future reference, that they check those things. The other thing that's, umm, interesting is traveling with someone who's passport is almost completely full--I met up with my brother in Europe as he was working his way back to the US after four years of living in India, over the ten years he's had his passport he's managed to completely fill all but one page off his passport with entry stamps from countries not all of which are entirely stable or exactly like America, and while he's used to getting extra questions at borders, it was interesting to me to watch the reactions that come from that. When we returned to the US, the customs official was particularly interested in what sort of job my brother had to have such a full passport because he hadn't seen anybody who didn't work for Halliburton with that many stamps for the sort of places he's been. I shudder to think of the hassle if he hadn't managed to get his laptop stolen a few months before.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    7. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by TheDisgrace · · Score: 2, Funny

      In the "long search" case they apparently also spent most of their time browsing the iPhoto and Photoshop albums and asked me a lot of questions about other places I had been.

      That's because terrorists like to keep cheerful photo albums on their computers about their various exploits.

      "Here's me and Al Mohammad Abied mixing plastic explosives! Look! There's mom in the background with pie! Hi mom!"

    8. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused -- is this referring to the 'border', meaning the two lines that separate our country from Canada and Mexico? Or is this going on at airports? Because I've never seen customs agents spend more than 2-3 minutes with a laptop off an international flight.

      I guess they've determined terrorists don't know how to use airplanes? Man, these guys are sharp...

    9. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, get real... these people are accountable to no one

    10. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who wouldn't be annoyed and upset if some official wants to look through all your personal stuff and has the power to confiscate your laptop for an indeterminate amount of time, without any justification?

      My laptop has an encrypted home partition. So it will boot with no passphrase, but all my personal data will be unavailable.

      All the data is backed up. Honestly, I think I'd rather lose the laptop than consent to a search while travelling.

    11. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by david_bonn · · Score: 1

      Because I enjoy visiting Canada, and if I make too much trouble I might be made much, much less welcome next time.

    12. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by meeotch · · Score: 1

      This is spot on, imho. I had my laptop "searched" by Canadian customs as well. The guy went through my porn collection (he said he was checking for kiddie porn). He also swab-tested it, and told me there were traces of cocaine on it. I asked him why I would do lines off of my expensive laptop, and not just use the table like everyone else?

      On another occasion, the sprightly, freedom-loving Canadians kept me tied up (figuratively) in customs for several hours. Stand up, sit down, call the person you're staying with for us, did you know I can see your criminal record on my terminal?, etc. Basically, some guy had a chip on his shoulder, thought I was a likely target, and figured he'd hassle me until I broke down and admitted to smuggling contraband Celine Dion CD's up my butthole.

      Looked at another way - cops (and anyone else) will use the tools they're given to do what they perceive to be their jobs. If they're not allowed strip search at will, they'll try to trip you up by inconveniencing you. If you give them sleep deprivation and the naked pyramid, they'll use that. Just imagine if someone told you, "You're hired! One half of one percent of the people in this room have illegal items - to keep your job, you must find them. Go!"

    13. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by masdog · · Score: 1

      They're just stalling. They're not interested in your laptop per se, more in your reaction to having your laptop studied.

      So that, folks, is why you should claim you have trade secrets on your laptop and require the guard to sign an NDA.

    14. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by madnuke · · Score: 1

      Yes I had my laptop searched at Toronto Pearson by the rent a cop customs security team. I had password on my laptop I just put it in, mind you I couldn't be bothered with any hastle as I had been travelling 20 hours and a flight home to the UK to catch. But I remember some 'older' laptops of the more bulkier type they took the batterys and hard drives out to see if there was anything inside. This was just before the Trans-Atlantic bombing attempt.

    15. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      In both of the Canadian searches, I was asked questions specifically based on email messages cached in my mail client. That was awful disturbing.
      In the "long search" case they apparently also spent most of their time browsing the iPhoto and Photoshop albums and asked me a lot of questions about other places I had been.


      Sounds like it is time not to travel with the laptop across borders. I know this could become some what annoying for home users, but for the business set it will become mandatory that any laptop that they carry outside of the office isn't capable of holding any company information. Logging on through VPN is somewhat common now a days, but for the small business or select folks they don't usually have to VPN in if they keep it all on the laptop. They'll use webmail, but won't have a VPN setup, which means everything is on that laptop. Well, business data theft reasons alone is why I wouldn't want my employees carrying laptops through points that will be searched. We may start seeing pre-cleaned class of laptop just to pass through these sorts of checks. Any business and techy savy user will just VPN to a their home server for access to important securable information.

    16. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Canadian Customs has "searched" my laptop twice. Once I sat at the border for about four hours while the tried to figure out how to use the finder. U.S. customs took my laptop (a MacBook Pro) out of the case and looked at it, but I think they decided they didn't want to spend the time with it.

      As a previous poster somewhere in the above post suggested to use a dummy account... I'll take this one bit further...

      When you cross the border, just use bootcamp ready to boot into a blank WinXP partition with the account set to a very limited user account that can only see files in its on C:\documents and settings\(profile) directory.

      I'd throw in a few incoculus pictures and documents and maybe some favorites to make it look like you actually use it it...

      Then let them do their search and let them be on their on their merry way.

      Also keep a dummy account on OS X just in case you get a smart border guard who asks you to reboot in OS X.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    17. Re:it isn't just the USA that does this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In the "long search" case they apparently also spent most of their time browsing the iPhoto and Photoshop albums and asked me a lot of questions about other places I had been.

      Of course. All they really wanted was to find a single "questionable" picture. Once they let you know they "have reason to believe" the person in it is underage, they have all they need to carry out the rest of their extortion.

      How many people will be able to resist after they're told they're likely a pedophile and will stay on the sexual predator's list for the rest of their lives. Especially now that many local governments are looking to have the exclusion zone (where listed people may not reside) around parks, schools, etc. made as large as possible.

      At least one San Francisco bay area sheriff is now getting "creative". He went over a map of his county and found gaps between the existing exclusion zones. So he's proposing that "mini-parks" be established within the gaps to make the entire county an exclusion zone. End of problem. For him.

      It's the same bullshit tactics the anti-smoking nazis use. Can't smoke in buildings. Oops, also can't smoke within fifty feet of a building entance. Sorry they average 80 feet apart. Oh, gee -- can't smoke at the open-air ballpark. On the San Francisco Bay peninsula, the city of Pacifica says you can't smoke on the beach. It's on the fucking Pacific Ocean, for Christ's sake!!!. At the end of the month, the Golden Gate National Recreation Area will forbid smoking on the entire fifty miles or so of its beaches, (including the one in Pacifica).

      In the buildings, the excuse is always second hand smoke. Outside, the excuse is the litter from cigarette butts. Funny that they can handle the druggies' needles, the beer cans and broken liquor bottles, the styrofoam and the used rubbers, but "Eeeeeuuuwwww -- the garbage truck loads of those nasty cigarette butts -- eeeeuuuwwww!!!!!"

  10. Stateless client by mikaelhg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just use a stateless thin client laptop, no need for hard drive encryption and no way to intrude.

    1. Re:Stateless client by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I was kind of thinking, with how cheap notebooks are (compared to the data) just have one ready over the border and leave it behind, use VPN to get to your data.

      Overkill, yes but better than losing my data to the goons.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Stateless client by moco · · Score: 1

      This is really a great idea for enterprise environments, but what about joe home user?

      --
      moi
    3. Re:Stateless client by mikaelhg · · Score: 1

      Just set up an Amazon EC2 remote virtual machine, which costs $0.10 per hour, for the duration of your trip. Install the necessary software, and connect to it from a wireless hotspot. There are other hosting options available if that doesn't suit your needs.

  11. Had this Happen by mysqlrocks · · Score: 1

    I had this happen to me last winter coming back from Canada. The officer had me turn on and log into my computer and then looked through my files for about 30 minutes. He only had me login as one account on the system, which isn't very smart if they're actually looking for anything. Also, if I had been doing something illegal and he found it, it would have been inadmissible since he was working on my laptop directly, not an imaged copy of my hard drive. Oh, and he didn't bother checking my iPod either.

    1. Re:Had this Happen by failure-man · · Score: 1

      And didn't bother to check, I don't know, the whole fucking internet.

      Seriously, why would anyone with anything serious to hide be dumb enough to carry it through customs on a laptop when there are all sorts of ways to slip it through the internet with 100% security and anonymity? The whole searching of laptops thing reeks of political grandstanding and fear mongering. In a sane world, proving that my laptop isn't a bomb should be enough of a routine check for the border.

    2. Re:Had this Happen by Dravik · · Score: 1

      You are seriously overestimating the smarts most criminals. Even international traveler criminals.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
  12. Total bullshit... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    Come on. Total bullshit. There is allmost certainly a ton of paperwork that goes along with every confiscation.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Total bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A laptop for filling in some paperwork? Sounds like a good deal to me. Where can I sign up to become a border guard?

    2. Re:Total bullshit... by plantman-the-womb-st · · Score: 1

      If you call a one page form with only 6 half-page width lines a ton...

      --
      Say bad words about my book, in cold oatmeal, or I shall sue!
    3. Re:Total bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. Total bullshit. There is allmost certainly a ton of paperwork that goes along with every confiscation.

      Assuming that they fill out and file the paperwork.

    4. Re:Total bullshit... by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Well, first you go to freeipodsupermania.com...

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    5. Re:Total bullshit... by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      If you call a one page form with only 6 half-page width lines a ton... a 3 page form on a single page?

    6. Re:Total bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you call a one page form with only 6 half-page width lines a ton... a 3 page form on a single page?

      Ahhh... you appear to have failed the "width vs. height" basic education courses.

  13. Revealing your password by travisco_nabisco · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry sir, I am not able to log onto my computer here since you clearly have security cameras that will record my password. Then you will be able to see all my kidd ...... ummmm, then you will see all the open source projects I am working on.

  14. Security by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whether a laptop is seized or not depends on size and brightness of the screen, and if it might have DVD rom and good speakers.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Security by TavisJohn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Then I better not travel with my Acer Aspire 9550.
      It has Altek Lansing 2.1 speakers built in.
      17" Widescreen display
      A DVD Burner
      And even an IR Remote!!!
      They would snag it right away!

    2. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamnit you're a loser. You're bragging to people you'll never meet about a laptop that no one cares about. Go shoot yourself.

      Now.

    3. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then I better not travel with my Acer Aspire 9550.

      My hero!

    4. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold plated maunure!

  15. Hard Drive Encryption? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So say its a company laptop and has an encrypted disk and company policy forbids you from giving your passwords to anyone. What then?

    1. Re:Hard Drive Encryption? by lostngone · · Score: 0

      Then your company will need to talk to the Government to find out if it can get its laptop back.

    2. Re:Hard Drive Encryption? by sofar · · Score: 1

      that's not necessarily a bad thing: if your companies name is IBM, Merryl Lynch or even Intel things will be rather different then if you're a one-man shop.

      That might even be a good thing: Then company laywers can start pushing for fair rules at the border - it's an outrage that seizure of goods without probable cause is allowed. The financial losses can be huge, especially to large companies. I'd almost volunteer ;)

    3. Re:Hard Drive Encryption? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Thats what a duress password is for :)

    4. Re:Hard Drive Encryption? by dtrent · · Score: 1

      they send you home.

    5. Re:Hard Drive Encryption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they manually remove your computer's harddrive, make a hard copy and then supoena your company for the password... and when your company stalls they arrest you for suspicion of terrorism and make you dissapear.

      SEE? Its totally fair, they gave you a chance to comply unconditionally before they took away all of your rights to privacy.

    6. Re:Hard Drive Encryption? by tilandal · · Score: 1

      They sieze your laptop and send it to the FBI?

  16. He's on vacation, but is responding to email by BeeBeard · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    One remedy some companies are considering is telling travelers coming back into the country with sensitive information to encrypt it and e-mail it to themselves, which at least protects access to the data, if not its privacy.


    It's kind of ridiculous that it's come to this, but encryption and self-emailing will at least get the porn^H^H^H^H information where it needs to go. How to keep your laptop from being seized is another matter. My tentative plan for next time I'm crossing the border is to pretend to be really sick (tissues in hand, pop Halls, etc.) while I'm being processed. Nobody will want to touch you or your belongings if they think it will cost them days of illness.
    1. Re:He's on vacation, but is responding to email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.. This won't work either.

      Instead of seizing your computer, your person will be seized and thrown in quarantine.

      After that, who knows what they're gonna search.

  17. Globalization Demands Open Borders by BeBoxer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For all the love that the US government and big corporations seem to have for 'free trade' and 'globalization', they don't seem interested in open borders. I wonder why not? It's OK for corporations to ship jobs around the world to wherever labor conditions are the most favorable to them. But if workers try to migrate to where the hiring conditions are better, they are demonized as 'illegals'. It's OK for corporations to buy supplies from any country, getting the best deal in the process. But if consumers try to buy products from other parts of the world, that's a no-no (witness Lik-Sang). True globalization demands open borders. Fire the border guards. Tear down the fences.

    Some will reply and tell me this is crazy. How it can never work. That somehow we just have to have walls. Why? And if walls are so good and necessary, would you support building them between the States? Why not?

    1. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by bunions · · Score: 1

      It's actually the Canadian border guards who gave me a hard time with laptops. About every 2 or three times I go through, I've gotten lightly grilled (sounds delicious!) over the contents of it - they ask about pirated movies and software, never mentioned anything about porn, probably because they're Canadian and too polite.

      So that makes the pointless annoyances at border crossing score something like US: 496 Canada: 2.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    2. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True globalization demands open borders. Fire the border guards. Tear down the fences.

      Some will reply and tell me this is crazy. How it can never work. That somehow we just have to have walls. Why? And if walls are so good and necessary, would you support building them between the States? Why not?


      It is a bad idea. Borders are good for keeping your citizens safe from external problems, be they illegal aliens that your economy can't cope with, or unfair competition from foreign companies that don't follow the stringent labor and environmental regulations that companies in your own country are bound by.

      Keep the borders, and fix the laws so that corporations can't take advantage of different laws, tax rates, and labor rates in different countries so easily while the rest of us get shafted if we try to do the same.

      As for a wall between states in the US, that's not a bad idea. Let's build one around the northeast so their craziness doesn't spread, and another one around the southeast so their ineptitude doesn't spread. And most importantly, build one around Washington, DC while Congress is in session and don't let anyone out ever again.

    3. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by wsherman · · Score: 1

      True globalization demands open borders. Fire the border guards. Tear down the fences.

      It's not just globalization that demands open borders. It's the basic principles of freedom and equality. Somehow it's horribly wrong to tell someone where the can live on the basis of their race (just look at all the politicians jumping on the MLK bandwagon against segregation these days), but then it's totally fine to tell someone where they can live of the basis of who their parents were or where they were born? As far as I'm concerned it's all horribly wrong.

      Granted, it might smooth the transition of the borders were opened gradually. The goal we should all be striving for, though, is totally open borders.

    4. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      For all the love that the US government and big corporations seem to have for 'free trade' and 'globalization', they don't seem interested in open borders. wonder why not? It's OK for corporations to ship jobs around the world to wherever labor conditions are the most favorable to them. But if workers try to migrate to where the hiring conditions are better, they are demonized as 'illegals'.

      You are confused. It's not the big corporations that demonize people as "illegals." It's the big corporations' employees who want labor protectionism. The corps would be quite happy having the borders open, if only the government and employees would quit bitching at them about who they hire. And the people who do the bitching about this, also tend to bitch about globalism.

      The reason you are seeing inconsistencies in policies, is that there are competing interests (by different groups -- it's not hypocrisy) influencing and setting those policies. Government just seems hypocritical because it tries to fuck everyone equa-- uh -- in inverse proportion to their campaign donation.

      Then, of course, there's the relatively new (2001-) dimension to it all, having to do with stopping people for "national security" reasons rather than economic protectionism reasons. (i.e. It's not your job that they say Osama wants...) Even if America were to embrace truly free markets, lots of people are still going to want a border.

      And of course there's always good old fashioned racism. Sometimes I forget about that one, but it shouldn't be misunderestimated. Don't want those god damned vikings over here, raping our daughters.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    5. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Cr33pybusguy · · Score: 1

      You forgot one thing. When the wall around DC is finished fill it with water.

      --
      Hee Hee The drinking bird does all the work!
    6. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The only thing I don't like about that is that DC has some nice museums, and I wouldn't want anything in those being damaged.

      We need some way of eliminating the people inside the wall without hurting the artifacts.

    7. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm actually interested in travelling to Canada for Christmas to visit my brother, and even though I managed to get a flight that doesn't go through the US, people that visited Canada recently told me I was going to be treated badly (student visiting his brother in Canada? Surely trying to inmigrate illegally!! No matter I have a job and studies here - here being Uruguay btw).

      Are family visits strictly a no-no in this post 9/11 world? (I used to travel a lot more often before 9/11, and have never been to US or Canada). Should I expect to be treated harshly at the border? Any certain no-nos you can tell me?

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    8. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by bunions · · Score: 1

      I don't know. There's never any actual problems for me, just a lot of nonsense questions. "Do you have any pirated software on this? Do you have any pirated movies?" Do people ever say "yes" to that?

      I always make sure I'm squeaky-clean though. Don't bring over stuff that's illegal even if you've done it a million times before and everyone tells you it's fine. Don't antagonize the customs guy, even if he antagonizes you. Answer the actual question and not the question you think he wants answered. Don't volunteer information. Basic "Successfully Dealing With Authority 101" things.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    9. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      For all the love that the US government and big corporations seem to have for 'free trade' and 'globalization', they don't seem interested in open borders.

      Open borders are a threat to power for the government. However I'd say that big corporations are sympathetic to open border concepts, and would prefer to see them.

      It's not like they haven't been quiet to this point. Many are pushing for raising the H1B cap (or eliminating the cap.) There has been a lot of corporate concern regarding the US-VISIT program. Surprise, surprise--photographing and fingerprinting everyone who comes to the US is having a negative effect on tourism and trade.

      Keep in mind, the political parties are schizophrenic on these issues. Republicans wanted to lift the H1B cap (generally) but implement US-VISIT. Democrats want the H1B cap low, but I think they could be talked into making US-VISIT less severe.

    10. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Cr33pybusguy · · Score: 1

      Damn it! I knew there was a flaw to my plan. *stops building wall*

      --
      Hee Hee The drinking bird does all the work!
    11. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      build the wall around the government buildings, then fill with garbage. You're not going to waste perfectly good water, are you?

    12. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      Passports and strict border controls are a relatively new thing. A hundred years ago you could pretty much go wherever you wanted.

      Of course a hundred years back there was far less movement of people around the world because it was far more expensive - and thus far less potential for (uncontrolled) migration.

    13. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Some will reply and tell me this is crazy. How it can never work. That somehow we just have to have walls. Why? And if walls are so good and necessary, would you support building them between the States? Why not?

      Don't be silly, that would be wasteful. I just need a wall around my home property and another around the perimeter to my town. We could most likely only afford something like a 5-8 foot fence, which should be easy to get across and its not like we'd block the public roads. I have thought about building a 20 ft slick wall or maybe a canal between the US and Mexico. Honestly, I'd rather that the US just invaded down to Panama and build a federal highway all the way there, but that's not likely. You make it seem like companies/corporations are the ones keeping people throughout the world in place. I'd say that's more along the lines of a function of governments though. I think that governments don't want to loose there citizens to other governments. Would China or India be interested if 100-200 million of their citizens could freely immigrate to the US? I think some massive global migration would be good for us overall. The hurricane caused our first real widespread migration this generation in the US. I think that for the most part people don't move that far in general. I've generally stayed within a 4 state area with about a dozen trips to 2 additional states. Usually though that's traveling to visit family that causes me to travel. Usually I stay with a 30 minute by car area of town. My wife is a traveler by nature and she'd be perfectly at home in an RV traveling for the rest of her life and seeing new places. To be honest, I wouldn't take an international job or travel into an area where English wasn't the major langauge. This is part laziness on my side and part keeping my personal comfort. Would your average Indian or Chinese person actually want to move and live in the US? Most likely not. (It would be one of those wild dreams, but if you really pressed them on it they'd be more interested to visit and come back home with local wealth rather than living here in proverty. Open borders and easy freedom of movement may bring out the creation of really large population US cities. Could you envision a city purpose built for 100 million migrate workers? We just don't think on that level, yet.

    14. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's OK for corporations to ship jobs around the world to wherever labor conditions are the most favorable to them.

      No, it isn't okay. Lots of people say it isn't okay. Nobody in power gives a good God damn about what the people not in power say.

    15. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by khallow · · Score: 1

      I think some massive global migration would be good for us overall. The hurricane caused our first real widespread migration this generation in the US.

      I disagree. There was considerable outmigration from California in the last 10 or 20 years. And there's a lot of people who are high mobility. For example, there's a growing population of retirement aged travellers living partially or fully out of an RV.

      Could you envision a city purpose built for 100 million migrate workers? We just don't think on that level, yet.

      That's probably a really bad idea. The concentration of infrastructure and population would make a very tempting military target. I recommend some degree of decentralization.
    16. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I think some massive global migration would be good for us overall. The hurricane caused our first real widespread migration this generation in the US.

      I disagree. There was considerable outmigration from California in the last 10 or 20 years. And there's a lot of people who are high mobility. For example, there's a growing population of retirement aged travellers living partially or fully out of an RV.

      Could you envision a city purpose built for 100 million migrate workers? We just don't think on that level, yet.
      That's probably a really bad idea. The concentration of infrastructure and population would make a very tempting military target. I recommend some degree of decentralization.


      Um, ok. You don't like my 100 million migrate worker city idea. How about 1,000 of these http://www.freedomship.com/freedomship/overview/de sign.shtml ? They are supposed to house 100,000K each. I'd want them to be defended with a navy though so let's say 100 navy ships as well. Now we just need to power the things with nuclear reactors and have some hydroponics and we'd be set with a mobile nation.

    17. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by khallow · · Score: 1

      The corporations have no problems with open borders for immigration. That means far lower wage costs for them. The executives have gated communities and quality school systems. They wouldn't suffer Instead anti-immigration appears to be a populist thing with the lower income brackets who compete head on with the immigrants and have to deal with the substantial decline in wages. Also, bringing in large numbers of immigrants ultimately dillutes the value of US citizenship though this must be considered against the increase in economic activity. Historically, the costs of immigration have tended to be outweighed by the benefits. But in the past, immigrants have had to make larger commitments than they do in the age of airflight. A century ago, it was a long trip to get to the US from overseas and the cost was significant. If you came, you didn't have an easy way back.

      Some will reply and tell me this is crazy. How it can never work. That somehow we just have to have walls. Why? And if walls are so good and necessary, would you support building them between the States? Why not?

      There are good reasons to limit immigration. The key one is that society is for the citizens of that society. The US has built a lot of valuable infrastructure both physical and social. Unrestrained immigration would rapidly tax that infrastructure without an immediate corresponding benefit for US citizens. For example, suppose the US doubled in population over the next ten years due to immigration. Suddenly roads, schools, courts, etc are dealing with twice the number of people as they were before. Many of those people would become naturalized citizens. There is a tendency for immigrants, whether it be retired New Yorkers moving into western North Carolina (where I have some experience) or Mexicans moving into California, to make the region like where they moved from. If it's New York, that's not too bad. At least New Yorkers have a decent standard of living and tend to be competent, if obnoxious drivers. But some of these third world countries are pretty messed up and immigration limits would retard the influx of bad ideas (eg, squatter's rights, racism, socialism, etc) and behaviors (eg, terrorist attacks, international scale criminal activity) from these places.

      OTOH, I don't see unrestrained immigration as the end of the world. You would have to aggressively integrate them into society and get them working, build massive amounts of infrastructure, etc. But the US probably is wealthy enough that it probably could manage.
    18. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by khallow · · Score: 1

      Um, ok. You don't like my 100 million migrate worker city idea. How about 1,000 of these http://www.freedomship.com/freedomship/overview/de sign.shtml ? They are supposed to house 100,000K each. I'd want them to be defended with a navy though so let's say 100 navy ships as well. Now we just need to power the things with nuclear reactors and have some hydroponics and we'd be set with a mobile nation.

      That is an excellent improvement on your original idea. If this fleet were flagged under the US, then the navy problem would be solved. Too bad that Freedom Ship seems to have stalled since I last checked up on them (last news story is early 2005).
    19. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by vox_soli · · Score: 1

      Try a neutron bomb.

    20. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      We'd have to make sure the walls have plenty of lead in them.

    21. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Is radon heavier than air? VX? Let's just fill it with that... I'd suggest chlorine gas, but that'd hurt the things we want to keep, too ;)

    22. Re:Globalization Demands Open Borders by Cr33pybusguy · · Score: 1

      Halon is. It also displaces oxygen. problem solved. (Works well for fire-fighting. Banned now though due to ozone depleting concerns. How something heavier than air damages the ozone I'm kinda hazy on though.)

      --
      Hee Hee The drinking bird does all the work!
  18. New? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

    You'd have to be pretty stupid to carry something that the law might be interested in on your laptop through customs. There's been another way for plenty of years.

    1. Re:New? by splorq · · Score: 1

      They have the internet on computers now? Who knew?

    2. Re:New? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How secure is that, then?

  19. Sony Batteries by Drakin020 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Prolly out of fear of sony batteries....added with a hint of plutonium....Badum *ching*

    --
    The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
    1. Re:Sony Batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Love your sig... Linux can cause mishandling of data and data loss. Please tell me how windows can do this 20 times better.

    2. Re:Sony Batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I'll bite:

      Show me what Windows can do for gaming, and I'll show you how Linux does it 30 times better.

      So THERE!

      Oh, and I forgot: nyah-nyah!

    3. Re:Sony Batteries by niteice · · Score: 1

      Any operating system can cause mishandling of data and data loss.

      --
      ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
    4. Re:Sony Batteries by Drakin020 · · Score: 0

      Ok simple...they run games.

      --
      The greatest revenge in life is massive success.
  20. My Lack of Surprise by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Last week, an informal survey by the [Association of Corporate Travel Executives], which has about 2,500 members worldwide, indicated that almost 90 percent of its members were not aware that customs officials have the authority to scrutinize the contents of travelers' laptops and even confiscate laptops for a period of time, without giving a reason.
    Customs can scrutinize & confiscate almost anything that isn't a diplomat or under diplomatic seal.

    Don't like it, get the law changed.

    Otherwise, all they'll get is a policy change... which is the equivalent of a "I promise" but without any garauntee or accountability.
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:My Lack of Surprise by camperdave · · Score: 1

      How can I, as a citizen of another country, get the American law changed?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:My Lack of Surprise by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Fly a plane into a building.

    3. Re:My Lack of Surprise by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      'seasy! the same way we got Afghan and Iraqi law changed.

    4. Re:My Lack of Surprise by bwd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Customs agents don't derive their power to conduct warrantless searches at the border from legislation.

      The Supreme Court has held in several cases, such as Hernandez and Ickes, that the ability to conduct searches is an inherent sovereign right of the country. The President, through Customs, is able to exercise this right through Article II.

    5. Re:My Lack of Surprise by Credible · · Score: 1
      Don't like it, get the law changed.
      When civil society meets the open source mentality... Yeeks.
    6. Re:My Lack of Surprise by bunions · · Score: 1

      It's not just American laws. Customs officials everywhere I'm aware of have the same lattitude.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    7. Re:My Lack of Surprise by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What I think this shows up is the simplicity of people who think that globalization in any way makes the nation-state obsolete. The fact that we cross national borders more often, in the context of globalization and everything that makes globalization possible, reinforces the jurisdiction of the nation-state over people. Globalization, as currently practiced, really relies on the modern state in order to function, and enhances the position of that state.

    8. Re:My Lack of Surprise by drmerope · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is untrue, and this whole story is dated--as of October 2.

      See United States v. Arnold, 2006 U.S. Dist.

      The central holding of this ruling is that the so called border-search exception to the 4th amendment (argued as implicit in the ability of the gov't to levy and enforce tariffs) cannot apply to personal effects such as notebook computer as the information it contains retains 4th amendment protection.

      Consequently, searchs of your computer at the airport are illegal without a warrant.

      Searches which do not access the information content--e.g., x-ray examination--are still allowed.

      This case even had the "save the children" gateway to degrading the rights of the people--the defendent was found to have child pornography on his computer.

    9. Re:My Lack of Surprise by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      Customs can scrutinize & confiscate almost anything that isn't a diplomat or under diplomatic seal.

      "Twas ever thus." About 20 years ago, a colleague and I drove from Toronto to Chicago to demo our new software for potential clients there. Our product was installed on a Compaq luggable (it weighed about 25 lbs!) which, at the time, was manufactured in Texas. The border guard wanted to know why we were bringing the computer back into the US. "Are you gonna sell it? We can't have you taking bidness away from US companies." Worse, our product was Unix-based (SCO - so shoot me..), so no MS-DOS command line, and no Lotus 1-2-3 to show them, which apparently were the only OS/application they had ever heard of. We spent almost an hour convincing this moron, and his supervisor, that we weren't interested in selling it, that it did have legitimate business software on it, and that we were going to take it back with us. After making us fill out three or four forms, we were finally permitted to enter. But I'll never forget the last words from the border guard:

      "You better make damn sure this machine leaves the United States, boy!"

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    10. Re:My Lack of Surprise by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I hear they go more for the Inspirons.

      Rich

    11. Re:My Lack of Surprise by bunions · · Score: 1

      I was hoping no one would notice that awful inadvertant pun.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    12. Re:My Lack of Surprise by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The Supreme Court has held in several cases, such as Hernandez and Ickes, that the ability to conduct searches is an inherent sovereign right of the country. The President, through Customs, is able to exercise this right through Article II.

      Doesn't this violate the Amendment about unreasonable searches and seizures? Especially if the people being searched are US Citizens returning home?

    13. Re:My Lack of Surprise by Cervantes · · Score: 1

      Funny how a comment so short, can be so right.

      --
      If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    14. Re:My Lack of Surprise by careykohl · · Score: 1

      Close bwd,

      19 U.S.C. 1467 and 19 C.F.R. 162.6, are the laws that give Customs and Border Protection the power to do border searches. Those laws were upheld as constitutional by The Supreme Court for the reason you said. Control your borders is an inherent right of every sovereign country.

      http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/travel/admissability/

  21. Scary by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's getting so that I don't want to travel to the States any more. They're getting waay too uptight.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Scary by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've declined three employer-funded trips to business meetings and conferences in the USA in the past couple of years. The thought of having some jackbooted stormtroo^H^H^Homeland Security officer with a German shepherd on a leash screaming at me to produce my "PAPERS! PAPERS!" just turns me off. The USA just isn't a place I want to visit any more.

    2. Re:Scary by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      I think that's the whole point.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    3. Re:Scary by LindseyJ · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's getting so I don't want to travel to Europe anymore. They're getting waay too uptight.

    4. Re:Scary by ktappe · · Score: 1
      It's getting so that I don't want to travel to the States any more. They're getting waay too uptight.

      Not just the States. It was London that would not allow any carry on bags at all for a month; even the U.S. didn't get that uptight.

      -Kurt

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    5. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
      It's getting so that I don't want to travel to the States any more. They're getting waay too uptight.
      I agree that this is out of control, but there's one thing I can't figure out. What country are you from? Last time I checked, just about every other country on Earth was just as bad, if not worse at protecting people's rights. Where is this fictional country? Europe? Yeah right don't make me laugh. I've heard all sorts of stories about laws in various European countries that we Americans would see (rightfully) as appalling attacks on civil liberties. Just look at Oriana Fallaci, who (before she passed away earlier this year) was facing criminal charges in Italy for "defaming Islam", all because of 18 "blasphemous" statements she made in her book The Strength of Reason. Apparently, one such statement was calling Islam "a pool that never purifies".


      So don't get on your high horse and pretend that your country (whether it's in Europe or elsewhere) is any more respectful of freedom and individual rights than the U.S. is. I'm not saying it's impossible to have a country that's any more free than the U.S., but right now, there really isn't one. And believe me, as a U.S. citizen, the events of the past several years (Bush, the Patriot Act, etc) have made me seriously consider leaving the country. The problem is, there's nowhere else to go that's any better at the moment.

    6. Re:Scary by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's the UK, not continental Europe. I haven't heard about any other European countries trying to ban sharp knives like the UK.

    7. Re:Scary by Dravik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I certainly hope this article doesn't figure into this. This is done by every customs department in every country. If you take a trip to the US you will run this risk when entering the US but you will also run this risk when you reenter wherever you came from.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    8. Re:Scary by fingon · · Score: 1

      Hell no. I for example live in Japan. For some mysterious reasons (too many sudden business trips maybe?) I have reached the ultimate, SSSS-ranking at US (and who said they're not nazis?). Every time I get boarding pass printed there, quality time begins.

      In Japanese customs? I think they've wanted to see my passport every time, but after that "oh, you live here? move on, I've got tourists to hassle coming up."

      The risk _might_ be there, but the probability in case of 'the land of the free' is orders of magnitude more than anywhere elsewhere, due to their funny profiling habits, and completely out-of-this-world paranoia.

      --
      -- pending
    9. Re:Scary by Acer500 · · Score: 1

      It's bizarre, but after going through dictatorships, a few countries in South America actually feel better than the US nowadays (Chile, Uruguay) - probably not in actual legislation, but definitely yes day-to-day.

      I don't know which countries are actually better, and I've heard of scary things in Europe too... I guess New Zealand looks like a nice place to retire to.

      Let's see, it ranks 12th in the recent Reporters without Borders index (1st non-european) and 9th in the index of Economic Freedom (I don't know how accurate that one is).

      Links:

      http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/

      http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=554

      BTW, Uruguay ranks 46th and Chile ranks 50th (about the same as the US), Chile ranks close to the US in the Economic Index at 14th place (tied for 9th for the US) while Uruguay is again at 46th (mostly because of having socialists in power, a brutally heavy fiscal burden and weak state of banking).

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    10. Re:Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever lived anywhere other than the USA? You're normalized to a very strange environment.

      It doesn't look so free to the rest of us, honestly.

    11. Re:Scary by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've linked to something that's from the Daily Mail, the British equivalent of FOX News. Heck, probably worse.

    12. Re:Scary by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I agree that this is out of control, but there's one thing I can't figure out. What country are you from? Last time I checked, just about every other country on Earth was just as bad, if not worse at protecting people's rights.

      Actually, I think the US just entered the same pool as all the third-world countries with Bush signing away your rights to habeas corpus. So while other countries are certainly 'as bad' as the US, most Westernized countries are now, in fact, a lot better despite having their own problems.

    13. Re:Scary by macdo · · Score: 1

      Right! I even stopped thinking about it... As a non-american I would have no rights at all, and since my laptop is filled to the gills with articles and information about chemistry, physics, Darwin and other 'dangerous or suspect material', I am reasonably sure I would be 'offered' a red/orange suit and a free ticket to a certain place in Cuba... So

    14. Re:Scary by mce · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Similar story here. I'm an MBA student right now and the (European) school organises several 1 week exchanges for us to choose from early in 2007: New York, Milan, Bejing, and St. Petersburg. I ruled out New York from day one because I refuse to visit the US under the current regime. Guess where I will most likely be doing business instead after graduating?

      The last time I was in the US was in May 2003. That was a business trip that I could not possibly escape from, but the airport experience was telling. The worst part of it, is that I was there to help a US based spin-off company of ours get off the ground. They were going to sell the stuff that I had been working on for 7 years and that so far was mostly funded by EU research grants. Yes, you got that right: we did the most risky bit, they were going to do the packaging and run away with the profits. And then the US treat me like criminal. (A criminal who also happens to have a Nato Secret security cleareance at that!) That's when I decided to never ever go back unless the US clean up their act a *lot*. Sadly, things have only gotten worse since then.

  22. Blah Registration by nurb432 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Guess i wont be reading the rather potentially disturbing story.

    I wonder how long it will be before local police start stopping people at random to do searches of laptop/mp3/pda contents. Much as they do now for random drug/seatbelt/terrorism/etc searches.

    "its random so we arent violating anyones rights".. my ass.

    Time for total encryption of anything you carry. Too bad i cant encrypt my ipod, or PDA.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Blah Registration by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      In the US, it will be a long time.

      In general, the police cannot do discretionary stops inside the country. They are allowed to stop drivers at stationary drunk-driving checkpoints as long as they use a predetermined selection of cars (every 3rd or 5th or whatever). These stops are OK because (1) they're very limited, (2) they offer no discertion and (3) they are related to road safety. The police are not allowed to randomly search people or their laptops without any suspicion.

      At the border, things are different -- the government has a strong interest in controlling what comes in at the border, whether it's drugs, nuisance plants or child pornography. So, there is no 4th amendment right at the border. (I'll admit that keeping kiddie porn out of an International airport seems dumb when they can't keep it off the Internet.) In Canada, for example, they can charge customs on some types of business records, whether they're electronic or paper. (I don't remember the details.)

    2. Re:Blah Registration by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      In the US, it will be a long time.

      I bet plenty of people said that about habeus corpus in 2000, and just look what happened to it!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Blah Registration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stick a truecrypt partition on it?

  23. Think so, eh? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1
    Also, if I had been doing something illegal and he found it, it would have been inadmissible since he was working on my laptop directly, not an imaged copy of my hard drive.

    You think so, eh? In this day and age of warrentless searches and guilt by profile, you think that would make any difference at all? Why not manufacture some "documents" and give it a try?

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
  24. "Sir, please enter your password" by eddy · · Score: 1

    Time to set the password prompt to "NO SYSTEM DISK OR DISK ERROR" and make sure echo is off :-\

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:"Sir, please enter your password" by Amouth · · Score: 1

      but how will you hide the LILO ????

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    2. Re:"Sir, please enter your password" by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      Boot to XP, hibernate and recover from that. When you are done, re-hibernate - never see the other OS installed.....

    3. Re:"Sir, please enter your password" by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      but how will you hide the LILO ????


      Patch the BIOS itself. AWARD BIOSes typically can be edited, and new features added. Some information about this is available from around the Etherboot project.

    4. Re:"Sir, please enter your password" by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      Or use container file based encryption like say, TrueCrypt, and a hidden volume! Voila. Put some random stuff in the normal layer and away you go. Complete deniability.

  25. This is a concern by NetDanzr · · Score: 1
    I work for a company that has several managers who travel almost constantly between our headquarters in the US and our subsidiaries in Europe, China and Brazil. Because of the risk of theft (but also applicable here), they are not allowed to store any corporate data on their computer; it's all on our corporate server and they need to either VPN or FTP (depending on firewall rules) into their directory if they want to get anything. Everything is then saved back there.

    For the same reason (in my case primarily travel between the US and Europe) I always keep all my private files on my personal server in the US. This way, all a potential thief or border agent would get is a relatively clean laptop with a few applications and games. All I'd lose would be a few saved game files, which are much more fun to recreate than rewriting a lost spreadsheet.

    1. Re:This is a concern by rabiddeity · · Score: 1

      they need to either VPN or FTP (depending on firewall rules) into their directory if they want to get anything.

      You DO realize that FTP passwords are transmitted in cleartext, right?

    2. Re:This is a concern by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 1

      I think your organisation's security people should have a look into the concept of temporary files and do some reading on the US Custom's computer forensics tool of choice, EnCase :)

  26. International Business by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    So you just put a backup on a internet accessable site, just in case your killer presentation is eaten by customs.. ( and be sure to email home your priceless family trip pictures )

    A little planning is all that is needed.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:International Business by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      The planning is simple. Just don't go to the US anymore - I've stopped holidaying there purely because of the appalling attitude of the border thugs^H^H^H^Hguards.

    2. Re:International Business by Builder · · Score: 1

      On my last (and I don't just mean previous) trip to the US, I filled 8GB of compact flash with photographs. Care to tell me how I should e-mail that lot home?

      While we're at it, care to explain ow the US is the land of the free if that's what I have to do just to keep my photos safe?

    3. Re:International Business by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      That only applies to US citizens while in the country :)

      On a more serious note, i dont think that label really applies anymore. we are now the land of the 'sort of free'.or the 'more free then you'.. or some derivative of it.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:International Business by Builder · · Score: 1

      I thought that you were the 'Land of the free*, home of the brave**'

      *some restrictions may apply offer not valid in all locations or to all colours of people or on days that end in Y

      **By which we mean chickenshit cowards who give up freedoms without thought

  27. What's supposed to happen and what does happen by hackwrench · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's supposed to happen and what does happen are two different things. What processes are in place to ensure that is what happens?

  28. Business Idea that can solve this issue... by gamlidek · · Score: 1

    Laptop rentals like car rentals... Just tell the rental company what software you need on the laptop when you reserve it, bring your USB file storage with all your files on it, and Bob's your uncle. Of course, this leaves out all the fine details, but anyone who has the resources to start such a business can work on that. *sigh* ah, the future... such a wondrous place, isn't it? And so... secure... /gam/

    --
    "In theory, theory and practice are the same; in practice, they are not."
    1. Re:Business Idea that can solve this issue... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Sir, a business user, are you not? Here, we have prepared the laptop you requested, with a complimentary keylogger, specifically tuned for your needs. Please do not hesitate to contact us about anything that does not work as intended. Thank you for using Rent-A-Laptop's services. Have a nice day.

    2. Re:Business Idea that can solve this issue... by boomfart · · Score: 1

      They do, just google laptop rental.

    3. Re:Business Idea that can solve this issue... by boomfart · · Score: 1

      Lots of companys rent laptops, most people realise that it is not worth trashing a perfectly profitable buisness to get a few passwords off random users. If you do not trust the company you rent from just format the HD on collection and install your own OS then format again on return. The rental company wants your data as much as they want the viruses, spyware, malware and other nasties customers leave behind this would be why they wipe the drive on return without even booting from the HD. I have only had one customer that did not like this he thought it was reasonable to keep the HD after a short rent because it had HIS data on it, he has a hard time understanding why we kept charging him until the WHOLE laptop was returned we offered to let him keep the HD if he paid for a replacement.

  29. Would they search a video ipod? by phatvw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whats so special about a laptop? Why not search the CD-ROM in my mp3 player or my USB keychain? Or better yet, just scan my freaking mind by doing the FBI psyche battery exam.

    Have all those exploding Dell/Sony batteries been reclaimed yet? Perhaps we could all carry those laptops to the airport and then see how much they like to search these things. But then we'd probably be put on terrorist watch lists or something.

    I think I'll be having my wife bring the laptop hard drive in her purse from now on.

    1. Re:Would they search a video ipod? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Whats so special about a laptop? Why not search the CD-ROM in my mp3 player or my USB keychain? Or better yet, just scan my freaking mind by doing the FBI psyche battery exam.

      Doesn't this make you wonder how much of out internet traffic, email and attachments are scanned and recorded? What about all those ftp sessions, moving files back and forth. Mmm?

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Would they search a video ipod? by phatvw · · Score: 1

      What about all those ftp sessions, moving files back and forth. Mmm?

      Thats why you should always run a wireless router at home and leave it unsecured. Run unknown MAC address through proxy to limit bandwidth and make sure to regularly delete any logs that include IP or MAC addresses.

      Plausible deniability is the name of the game.

    3. Re:Would they search a video ipod? by aplusjimages · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oddly enough the laptops get convinscated when the border patrol has a birthday or anniversary coming up. They call it the Homeland Security Special Discount.

      --
      Can I bum a sig?
    4. Re:Would they search a video ipod? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With a government as corrupt as the Americans have, businesses really need to consider this an industrial espionage vector.

      Wonder how much of a chilling effect this will have on American business.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    5. Re:Would they search a video ipod? by spun · · Score: 0

      America has a long history of facilitating industrial espianage. When the CIA needs cover overseas, they go with certain tried and true large corporations. In exchange for providing cover for agents, these companies get access to classified information about their competitors. It started with Xerox in the former Soviet Union. They put cameras in the copiers. When the camera ran out of film, it would flip a relay and the 'service needed' light would come on. A 'technician' would come out and replace the film.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    6. Re:Would they search a video ipod? by surprise_audit · · Score: 2, Informative
      The easy fix for business travellers would be to clone the hard disk, keep the original at home and FedEx the clone to their destination. Fly with the diskless laptop...

      TSA: please turn the laptop on, sir.
      Me: [click]
      TSA: What's this "No Hard disk" message? Why isn't it booting?
      Me: [checks watch] The hard disk should be arriving in London is 30 minutes. I mailed it yesterday
      TSA: Duh? What?

    7. Re:Would they search a video ipod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's your idea of an easy fix? Are you dim?

  30. Confiscated means Compromised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From now on, I'm wiping all my personal files from my laptop before travelling. I'll do a clean install and SCP any required docs from my home server when I get to the hotel. For the return journey, I'll commit any changes to my home server, wipe the files from my laptop and reinstall.

    None of my personal files are illegal or "top secret" but they're all "mind your own fucking business". It's an issue of trust and I have no faith in the Bush administration or its agents.

    1. Re:Confiscated means Compromised by wrf3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's an issue of trust and I have no faith in the Bush administration or its agents.

      I have no faith in any administration or its agents. I wish the rest of the world would wise up to this. Government is not now, never has been, nor ever will be our friend.

    2. Re:Confiscated means Compromised by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. But then again, I'm an anarchist.

      On topic ... when I get a laptop (which I am doing for an international trip), I am just going to do what others above have suggested and encrypt all my stuff, have multiple accounts and only login to one that doesn't have any thing 'dangerous' if asked, and have a duel boot setup (X/GNU/Linux and X/GNU/Linux) so that I can default to a 'safe' OS that doesn't have 'easy' (unless you know GNU/Linux and my partition table) access to the other OS.

      And has anyone else noticed that travel insurance does not cover acts by governments, thus if a government steals my stuff it isn't covered. And that sucks.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    3. Re:Confiscated means Compromised by Yakman · · Score: 1
      have a duel boot setup

      Two OSs enter, only one may leave! FIGHT!
    4. Re:Confiscated means Compromised by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      OK that's funny.

      --
      I wank in the shower.
  31. confiscation without a reason is called . . . by rev_sanchez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    stealing. The US border guards are stealing computers. How about we make them stop stealing things?

    --
    If you didn't come to party don't bother knocking on my door. Prince '1999'
    1. Re:confiscation without a reason is called . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has been going on for at least decades, ( and probably since Roman times...) My parents had a nice set of native baskets from Buka, Papua New Guinea, `confiscated' by Australian Customs officers in Cairns, Australia, in the mid 1950's. They are unique in the world, and were quite valuable then, and would be worth many hundreds of dollars each today. The official excuse was that they had not been sprayed with insecticide properly (they had been).

      The father of a friend of mine traveling from PNG to Australia had his nice, brand new, knee-high leather boots confiscated, also in Cairns, some twenty years later. The excuse then was that they had 'mud on them' which was not true, as they had not yet even been worn, and had not even been made in PNG.

    2. Re:confiscation without a reason is called . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you are saying is that thieves have been around for decades if not far, far longer. I agree, its fairly obvious. The nice thing is, dealing with thieves is a problem with a known solution - surveillance. Videotape the exchange and see how keen the thieves are to steal your stuff while you are openly collecting forensic evidence of their actions. Use a camera with a wireless transmitter, so if they steal and smash your camera as well then there is no film that can be destroyed. Inform them of this, and that the video will be used as evidence to prosecute them if necessary.

      If needed, send the video to the federal police, the media, and put it up on youtube. There are few things thieves hate more than having their crimes made public.

      If they have nothing to hide, then they should have no reason to complain right?

  32. US? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It wont stop here, it will spread to europe, then the rest of the world.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:US? by Gandalf_the_Beardy · · Score: 1

      As an EU citizen I can wander around the entireity of Europe more or less without even needing a passport. Most border roads are unpoliced - hell some of them don't even tell you you went from France to Germany and they only clue is the roadsigns are suddenly in a different language. I doubt that's going to change in a hurry as it would totally shaft the economies

    2. Re:US? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      That is how the US used to be too, but is slowly changing as more well defined passages between states is formed, ripe for 'enforcement'. Today, we have tax issues across state lines, and other similar rules that are different across 'borders'. So there is incentive.

      Not saying it will happen overnight, but with the way the leaders of the world are today, i bet it happens sooner then we all think

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:US? by Dravik · · Score: 1

      This already happened. It is why the federal government is given authority over interstate commerce.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    4. Re:US? by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 1

      Most border roads are unpoliced - hell some of them don't even tell you you went from France to Germany

      Friend of mine(from India) went to Switzerland with his family for a short vacation.They crossed into france unwittingly (while site seeing around Geneva).The Police allowed them in,even though they didnt have a visa, because they were a family with a tour group.Now, that's common sense.

      --
      Wanted : A Signature.
  33. This entire story is awfully disturbing. by s20451 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So customs authorities have the power to inspect the data on your laptop, or presumably any other data-carrying device, without warrant or even cause.

    But an obvious way around this search would be to transfer the data electronically, and perhaps rent a laptop in the US to retrieve it.

    So my question is this. If searching files on a physical device is legal, would it not also be legal for customs to "inspect" all electronic data that crosses international borders? And in the same way that it is legal for the authorities to sieze a laptop for more intensive analysis, would it not also be legal for customs to "embargo" electronic transmissions until they can be analyzed? (Perhaps compelling the sender or receiver, whichever one is on their soil, to disclose the key?)

    Think about the implications for a couple of minutes. This would put the Great Firewall of China to shame, and you have to know that somebody in the justice department is thinking about doing it.

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So my question is this. If searching files on a physical device is legal, would it not also be legal for customs to "inspect" all electronic data that crosses international borders?
      It is done, at least in the U.K. I know one of the government nerds who are doing it. Probably the same thing in the U.S. One of your friendly three letter agencies is taking care of this.
    2. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1
      If searching files on a physical device is legal, would it not also be legal for customs to "inspect" all electronic data that crosses international borders? And in the same way that it is legal for the authorities to sieze a laptop for more intensive analysis, would it not also be legal for customs to "embargo" electronic transmissions until they can be analyzed?

      Yes to both questions, but practically speaking it would interfere with too much money-making for it to be politically popular.

    3. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by bunions · · Score: 1

      > So customs authorities have the power to inspect the data on your laptop, or presumably any other data-carrying device, without warrant or even cause.

      Pretty much. The important thing to remember about international borders is that you have essentially zero rights, and should therefore be really goddamn careful. It's weirder now at the Canadian/US border because it's always been so open, and now it's closing up a little. But it pays to remember that you're essentially in no-mans land and should act as such.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    4. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by tengwar · · Score: 1
      I think this is basically a US idea that borders are a liminal space. I don't know of anywhere else that acts like this and I travel widely (surprised that Canada gave a problem to the OP). Everywhere I've travelled, the borders are subject to the same law as anywhere else. In the Schengen subset of the EU, borders are open to the extent that I've crossed them at 80mph.

      BTW, in the UK we have had a problem with "Customs and Excise" which is nothing to do with a liminal border area. They were established before the idea of due process in the modern sense, and have or had the right to seize goods permanently without a warrant or court approval. This caused problems a few years ago when they started confiscating peoples cars when they started exercising a new right to bring in large quantities of alcohol for strictly private consumption - e.g. a middle-aged lady losing her Range Rover when she brought in a load of wine for her daughter's wedding. I'd not sure where this stands now as they've been re-orged into the Inland Revenue.

    5. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by bunions · · Score: 1

      > Everywhere I've travelled, the borders are subject to the same law as anywhere else. In the Schengen subset of the EU, borders are open to the extent that I've crossed them at 80mph.

      Well, the EU probably has some kind of negotiated border rights, and as some kind of meta-nation, it's probably to be expected that it's exceptional in many ways. But big chunks of the Canada/US border used to be the same way, almost. Drive through, wave at the customs guy and keep moving.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    6. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by Rob_Warwick · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So my question is this. If searching files on a physical device is legal, would it not also be legal for customs to "inspect" all electronic data that crosses international borders?

      As I understand US law (IANAL, I'm not even an American) there's a difference legally between data that's in transmission and in storage. One falls under wiretapping laws, one is just under search laws (if I remember).

      Here's an mp3 of the talk where I heard about it at HOPE Number Six: http://www.hopenumbersix.net/mp3/16/network_monito ring_and_the_law.mp3

      Incidentally, the same conference that I had my laptop searched coming back from. Canadian customs officials, I'm a Canadian citizen. They used spotlight for a couple minutes in a back room and then returned it. I would /love/ to know if there is some legal info about this, since I would have been willing to assert my rights, I'm just not sure what they are in that situation. I figured that they have roughly the same rights as if I was carrying a stack of (paper) notebooks and wanted to read through 'em, but that'd be logical, and I've rarely seen the law work logically where a computer was involved.

    7. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      It's weirder now at the Canadian/US border because it's always been so open, and now it's closing up a little. But it pays to remember that you're essentially in no-mans land and should act as such.

      It depends on where you're crossing the border as to whether it's open or closed. In Minneasota, and I'm sure North Dakota and the other states to Washington, there are roads you can drive a car from Canada to the US or the other way without any border guard, shacks, or any need to stop.

      Falcon
    8. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

      This would put the Great Firewall of China to shame, and you have to know that somebody in the justice department is thinking about doing it.

      Well sure, now they are!

      Sheesh.

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    9. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by bughunter · · Score: 1
      Disturbing indeed.

      The part I find most disturbing is the fact that the violation of individual citizens' 4th amendment rights against unreasonable seizure was not an issue.

      But once the privacy and intellectual property of corporate ubercitizens is being threatened, all of a sudden it's an issue that needs to be addressed.

      It just proves, yet again, that individuals' rights in the USA have eroded to nearly nothing, and the rights of fictitious entities have become paramount.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    10. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Canada in Africa?

    11. Re:This entire story is awfully disturbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really wanted to hide something why wouldn't someone just buy an offshore server, in a country that doesn't have any judicial relations with the US, and store your encryped files there; also what keeps you from having a program set up to run with a specific logon, to delete a file, like on windows just delete msgina.dll, which totally disables the entire user interfce; or just edit the reg entry that points to that file; the only people that they are going to catch are the stupid people, any terrorist with any knowlage of hinding data would know ways of fooling the customs.

  34. Best way to transport the laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FedEx it to the hotel.

  35. Dumb move USA.. by zytheran · · Score: 5, Informative

    For many people outside of the USA having an encrypted HD is a matter of good business sense or national security, depending on where you work. For those who work outisde the USA in the defence area, and work colaboratively with people in the USA, this is now a major hassle. When crossing the border the software needed for decent security is now effectively banned from leaving the country and your laptop will be confiscated. The fact the software came from another country in the first place and the person is actually working for a friendly government and helping the USA government is seemingly irrelevant. The solution to this problem which many are taking is quite simple, limit helping the USA with any classified or confidential work. And before people reply "the USA doesn't need anyone else", please think about why you have huge national debt ...
    I thought that after 911 the government departments were meant to be 'beating to the same drum' for national security and yet here we are, 5 years later, with a case of the geniuses that run border security stuffing up other government departments.

    1. Re:Dumb move USA.. by purduephotog · · Score: 4, Informative

      We solved this problem the easy way: We ship everything FedEX overnight to the destination.

      Have had equipment confiscated in a number of places, had to pay 'import' taxes on company owned equipment with access tags (got it reimbursed after 8 months)... but FedEx gets it there, no hassles, no problems.

      Best of all? I travel for the government. So in essence, I'm charging them cost plus to ship my equipment so that it won't be confiscated by their agents.

      &*shakes head*&

    2. Re:Dumb move USA.. by smchris · · Score: 1


      I've been using a junk laptop for years. Who knew I was in the avant-garde?

      FedEx the _data_.

      Could be the ticket.

  36. How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Did I miss something? IANAL, but the last time I checked, the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution explicitly prohibits search and seizure without probable cause. In fact, I just re-read it to make sure, and it doesn't say "except at border crossings."

    Can someone enlighten me as to how ANY U.S. court has seen fit to uphold random seizure of personal property without even a hint of probable cause? Does this only apply to non-U.S. citizens? (yes, I did RTFA, but it didn't mention anything about that).

    1. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      I'm not a lawyer either, but you're probably not actually IN america until that border guard says you are. Until then, that piece of paper don't mean shit (and probably doesn't on this side, either)

    2. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by Dravik · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Constitution applies inside the United States. You have not entered the United States until you pass the border. The 4th amendment doesn't apply until you enter the country.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    3. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by topham · · Score: 1

      Actually,

      U.S. Customs on the border between Canada and the United States is generally located on U.S. soil.

      Canada customs, several yards further north is located on Canadian soil.

    4. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by chasisaac · · Score: 1

      The Constitution applies inside the United States. Yes of course it does. You are IN the United States on US soil when going though customs. Last time I went through customs in Philly. As I recall that is well inside the boarders of the United States.

      However, I am wondering how much of this applies to inter-state (NY to CA) traffic. There is TSA everywhere in airports and you are subject to them when flying say from Minneapolis to Dallas and never leaving US airspace.

      --
      -- A computer without Windoze is like a choclate cake without mustard
    5. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by dada21 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most of the Constitution applies all over the world in regards to the US governments. The term "citizen" is VERY rarely used, but the generic term "man" is used over and over to signify ALL men. The Founding Fathers were very specific about wanting the document to be accepted by countries all over the world, unfortunately, it isn't even accepted by most U.S. citizens anymore.

      The U.S. government has very specific and limited authorizations under the Constitution. Not just within the borders, but everywhere.

      Bush, Clinton, Gore, Obama (Barack), Kerry, Kennedy, all of them have to abide by the Constitution no matter where they're at. When will the courts start charging them with the treasonous act of violating the Constitution and give them the ultimate penalty?

    6. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by lagartoflojo · · Score: 1

      Well, the Bush administration has their own Fourth Amendment: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGhcECnWRGM

    7. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by Dravik · · Score: 1

      The TSA doesn't enter into this at all. This is about customs inspection when entering the country. When you fly from NY to CA you are not entering another country so customs doesn't have anything to do with you. You are not considered to have entered a country until you pass through that countries customs. Once you leave one country but haven't passed the others customs you are in a limbo are not really in eaither country. You could try to argue that customs should fly out and meet every international flight, transfer to the plane and conduct all business in the air but that isn't practical. The rules and assumptions of this setup predate the American Revolution. Tom Hanks did a rather amusing movie based on a worst case scenario of what could go wrong while traveling between countries.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    8. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by Raideen · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting theory, but if I'm not in the country until the border guard says I am, what country am I in? If I'm in international territory, who gave the border guard jurisdiction?

    9. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming what you are saying is true ( and others disagree with you on this point ), then US Law does not _protect_ border guards either. Does this mean that they can be shot with impunity with respect to International & US Domestic law? Can one set up Casinos, Ganja plantations, distilleries and whorehouses in the border area? That sounds like a golden opportunity!

    10. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government has a specific right to inspect people and goods coming into the country (and exiting, I presume). In the good old days (1776) most government revenue was derived from tariffs on goods entering and leaving the country. Income taxes (and general sales taxes) are a relatively modern invention. They were entitled to be sure that nothing illegal or escaping taxes came over the border, and they were entitled to check the papers of people entering the country. As previous posters noted, the right has always been upheld by the Supreme Court.

          They can do a lot of things at the border that they cannot do once you are in. Until Bush came along, you did not have to identify yourself to a policeman on the street unless you were being arrested or issued a summons. You obviously MUST identify yourself properly to a border guard.

    11. Re:How is this NOT Un-Constitutional??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's an interesting theory, but if I'm not in the country until the border guard says I am, what country am I in?

      Dunno, but you'll remain there until the border guard says you can come into his country.

      If I'm in international territory, who gave the border guard jurisdiction?

      He doesn't care how long you remain in international territory and you can't make him care. Jump over the barrier and you'll immediately be in some country where they'll arrest your ass. Not kind, but true.

      Interesting -- the captcha for this posting is "extort".

  37. Economic treason by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Potentially, this is going to have a real effect on how international business is conducted."

    Well, gee, then maybe you should be concentrating on ways to keep manufacturing and agriculture at home where they belong instead of conducting INTERNATIONAL business and enriching our enemies in Mexico, China, India, and Saudi Arabia?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Economic treason by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      From the perspective of the rest of the world the obvious answer is to stop doing business which requires travel to or from the US of A.

      I mean seriously; why would anyone want to travel to America any more? There have to be better places to do business and if you *have* to do business with Americans you get *them* to come to *you*.

      This would be almost as good as building a fence around the entire continental United States (which the current administration might actually consider doing...)

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    2. Re:Economic treason by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I mean seriously; why would anyone want to travel to America any more? There have to be better places to do business and if you *have* to do business with Americans you get *them* to come to *you*.

      Exactly right- Americans don't really have any money anymore that isn't financed to the hilt by loans from other countries anyway. If it wasn't for all the rumors that we are rich (which are totaly false) we wouldnt' be able to buy squat.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Economic treason by malzraa · · Score: 0

      When did Mexico and India get put on a trade embargo?

    4. Re:Economic treason by soulprivate · · Score: 1

      Ok, while you gaze at your navel, perhaps you can explain why this must be suffered by people like me, who periodically travel to the US for training courses, trade shows, business meetings and other activities, derived from purchasing US merchandises from US manufacturers.

      On my first business trip to the US, five years ago, a customs officer in Miami airport made me boot my laptop, describe RAM and disk capacity, enumerate the installed applications, and then kept me just standing there for 45 minutes, without any explanation or apology. It was an humilliating and degrading experience.

      Should we accept it meekly, in a grateful silence, in exchange for being granted the supreme honor of being admitted to the US? Why don't you reopen Ellis Island while you are at it?

      Of course, if any country enforces the same procedures on US citizens, it will be accused of arrogance, human rights violatons and the like. Nice going, US!

    5. Re:Economic treason by hosecoat · · Score: 1

      you forgot poland

    6. Re:Economic treason by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      In 1997 I went to Europe and the USA with my then girlfriend. Her visa application was rejected because she didn't own a house (she was renting) she didn't own a car (we had crashed it and were buying a new car with the insurance money) and she didn't have a permanent job (she is a medical doctor).

      We had to appeal through the US consulate here in Melbourne and we finally got the visa but it was a pretty horrible procedure being interviewed by a total arsehole on the other side of a big sheet of bullet resistant glass.

      For all I know the Australian immigration people are just as bad. Customs and immigration is one field where government workers are least accountable.

    7. Re:Economic treason by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      When did Mexico and India get put on a trade embargo?

      I said they were our economic enemies and *should* be on a trade embargo, not that they currently were.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    8. Re:Economic treason by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Ok, while you gaze at your navel, perhaps you can explain why this must be suffered by people like me, who periodically travel to the US for training courses, trade shows, business meetings and other activities, derived from purchasing US merchandises from US manufacturers.

      Why are you buying the US manufacturing? No American is anymore- it's all the latest stuff from China, Taiwan, and Singapore. In fact, I have great doubts that any US merchandise is actually made by US manufacturers here- just a bunch of economic traitors who take money from the price differential of importing it from China, slapping a "made in the USA" label on the repackaging, and sending it out to other countries. Americans are too expensive to work in factories if profit is your only motive.

      On my first business trip to the US, five years ago, a customs officer in Miami airport made me boot my laptop, describe RAM and disk capacity, enumerate the installed applications, and then kept me just standing there for 45 minutes, without any explanation or apology. It was an humilliating and degrading experience.

      So why do you bother with such an humiliating and degrading experience? It's not like there aren't other countries to buy from.

      Should we accept it meekly, in a grateful silence, in exchange for being granted the supreme honor of being admitted to the US? Why don't you reopen Ellis Island while you are at it?

      I personally wish we would- we've got a real problem with a lack of management in the Immegration Control and Enforcement, and because of it, we've got nearly a 10% illegal resident problem.

      Of course, if any country enforces the same procedures on US citizens, it will be accused of arrogance, human rights violatons and the like. Nice going, US!

      I see no reason why US Citizens should want to travel to other nations either.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    9. Re:Economic treason by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize Poland was becoming a big manufacturing powerhouse capable of taking American jobs- but you're right.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:Economic treason by HappyHead · · Score: 1

      Um, the United States doesn't cover a whole continent - only about 1/3 of one.
      Though they _are_ working on that fence thing from what I've seen.

    11. Re:Economic treason by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Um, the United States doesn't cover a whole continent - only about 1/3 of one.

      I believe I said 'Continental United States' ie not including Hawaii but probably including Alaska.

      Though they _are_ working on that fence thing from what I've seen.

      I know and I think its just brilliant that the current US administration is so thoughtful as to
      build a fence along its border with Mexico. I am sure that the Canadians will be relieved if
      they get such a fence as well.

      And people say George W Bush doesn't *care* about the rest of the world.

      You go, George! And once you've fenced off the Canadian and Mexican borders give a thought
      to putting up some kind of fence along your coastal areas and ports too. As high as humanly possible.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    12. Re:Economic treason by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      They're also working on the whole continent- a kind of SuperNAFTA where we'd adopt Mexico's labor laws and language and cut off the North American Union from the rest of the world.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    13. Re:Economic treason by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Its interesting how facts get changed retroactively.

      Like the CIA world factbook for example.

      It has some interesting demographic fields:

      Military manpower *available* for military service.
      Military manpower *fit* for military service.
      Total gross population is another.

      You can do some interesting math with some of the figures in there.

      Prior to some time in mid september of 2001 the "Fit for military service" field for the USA was, when you do the math, less than 1% of the total population.

      There was no other nation on the planet with a worse ratio. The very lowest any other nation got was about 5%.

      This has been corrected in all the online copies I can find going back to 1994.

      Its been 'corrected' to 'NA'.

      So yeah, paper tiger in every respect, except strategic arsenal. Might not be able to (effectively) invade another country but they can sure bomb the shit out of them.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    14. Re:Economic treason by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      So yeah, paper tiger in every respect, except strategic arsenal. Might not be able to (effectively) invade another country but they can sure bomb the shit out of them.

      And since we seem to be utterly unwilling to do that in any convincing way- we're very much a paper tiger.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  38. "due process" in the United States by v1 · · Score: 1

    did you miss the funeral? how long has it been?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  39. L.A. Federal Judge Disagrees by Puk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Funny that this article should come up right around the time the first federal judge addresses the question, and find that they do need to have reasonable suspicion.

    law.com article
    opinion

    Of course, this is not the end of the matter, but highly relevant.

    -puk

    1. Re:L.A. Federal Judge Disagrees by bwd · · Score: 1

      It does not matter if a federal judge disagrees. This has been settled decades ago by the supreme court. See U.S. v Montoya de Hernandez.

    2. Re:L.A. Federal Judge Disagrees by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      I heard the same thing, but that ruling only applies to the 9th Circuit Court (California & others).

      FYI - The 9th Circuit Court's decisions get overturned on appeal much more often than any other circuit.

      When this gets to Federal courts, lemme know.
      Mainly because Immigrations & Customs Enforcement (ICE) is the domain of the Feds.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:L.A. Federal Judge Disagrees by Buran · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does not matter if a federal judge disagrees. This has been settled decades ago by the supreme court.

      You mean, like how the right to abortion was decided decades ago by the supreme court and now there's all sorts of fussing that the law needs to be changed?

    4. Re:L.A. Federal Judge Disagrees by bwd · · Score: 1

      Abortion was never settled case law until Roe v. Wade. The Supreme Court refused to grant a write of certiorari until that time.

      Border search doctrine has been settled through a string of Supreme Court cases.

    5. Re:L.A. Federal Judge Disagrees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The circuit courts ARE federal courts.

    6. Re:L.A. Federal Judge Disagrees by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It does not matter if a federal judge disagrees. This has been settled decades ago by the supreme court.

      The Supreme Court also settled decades ago that people of African decent were "beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect."

      Fortunately, the opinions of the Court alter neither the text of the Constitution nor the nature of reality; they merely decide what degree of illiteracy and delusion the U.S. Government will operate under.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    7. Re:L.A. Federal Judge Disagrees by Puk · · Score: 1

      For the record, Montoya de Hernandez says that "routine" searches are fine, and the court in Arnold addressed Montoya de Hernandez specifically, saying that more invasive searches do require reasonable suspicion. That's settled 9th Circuit law, though I'm not sure it's ever been directly addressed by the Supreme Court. As I said, this is not the end of the matter -- we have to wait for the appeal, and if enough circuits disagree (or they somehow think it's important enough), maybe the Supreme Court will look at the question. But saying it "has been settled decades ago" is misleading at best. Think Sony and Grokster. It was well-established that there was this "safe harbor" until it turns out it didn't cover some other set of facts.

      -puk

    8. Re:L.A. Federal Judge Disagrees by Puk · · Score: 1

      For the record, both the court in Arnold (Central District of California) and the 9th Circuit are both federal courts. The 9th Circuit is a court of appeals that will hear Arnold (should the government choose to appeal), and may choose to affirm or reverse it. And until the 9th Circuit hears it, it only applies in the Central District of California (big area of CA containing L.A.).

      And more importantly (cause I hear it all the time), the 9th Circuit no longer has anywhere near the highest reversal rate. Nowadays, they're roughly average. Chart through 2004 and article. If you dive into the details, there are some differences in the manner in which they're reversed, but the numbers don't lie.

      -puk

  40. Fedex/UPS/etc by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They arent exempt from search. Just doesn't happen as often, due to the volume.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Fedex/UPS/etc by barutanseijin · · Score: 1

      I don't know if they still do it, but about 5 years back, FedEx was busted for bribing customs agents so that they could move stuff in more quickly. I can't remember if they were bribing US or Canadian agents. Maybe both.

  41. Sounds like a job for... by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

    Sony batteries!

    Ok, so you won't get your laptop back nor would it prevent being taken in the first place but, hey, at least you'll get the last laugh.

  42. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 1

    I wonder if user "usgovernment" with a feedback of 42k has any relevance here.

    1. Re:Moo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do all your posts have "Moo" for the subject?

  43. encrypted ipod - HOWTO by Splork · · Score: 1

    your ipod -is- encrypted if you're stupid enough to buy all of your music from the apple itunes music store with DRM.

  44. why is this a problem? by cyberworm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone here on slashdot is smart enough to keep backups anyways, so why is this even a problem?

    *hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhahahaahhah aha*

  45. Please. by LindseyJ · · Score: 1
    ...which, anecdotally, is happening more often. ...


    So in other words, the slashbots are getting all worked up over FUD and hearsay. What else is new? Show me documented cases of this and maybe you'll have a point.
    1. Re:Please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it FUD? Inconvenient truths get labeled as FUD around here for some reason.

    2. Re:Please. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Don't you know? The plural of anecdote is data.

    3. Re:Please. by LindseyJ · · Score: 1

      How is it truth? Because a lot of people said it? A lot of people said the Crusades were a great idea, too.

  46. The logic of bureaucracy by gettingbraver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If the paperwork isn't filled out, it didn't happen!

    1. Re:The logic of bureaucracy by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Especially if the only "proof" is some foreigner blabbing about a laptop (as if they even had electricity over there).

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  47. I had my laptop taken at the border by revolution1901 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm a u.s. citizen and had my laptop confiscated at the canadian border when re-entering the u.s. about three years ago. They also held me in a cell for a few hours until a person from ICE (immigration and customs enforcement) could arrive to interrogate me and my friends. After a few hours they let me through, turned around my canadian friends, and kept my laptop. They returned the laptop to me about four months later (with a burned copy of an EnCase client cd left in the cd rom drive).

    I had nothing to hide and there was nothing I could imagine useful to them on that laptop. If I thought I had something to hide or a reason the government would think I was up to something that would warrant their taking my laptop (something more than my political activism), I would not have carried it across the border. In any event, this taught me me a few things: 1) always encrypt entire partitions, including one's root partition, not individual files as I had been doing, 2) don't carry one's private encryption key when crossing borders [or in any obvious way the rest of the time], 3) always keep plenty of encrypted backups in different physical locations so that you can be back up to speed as soon as possible if your laptop is taken, 4) avoid carrying electronics across the border at all if one can't afford to replace the hardware soon afterward.

    Personally, it made me happy to know the government spent time and resources copying and possibly picking through my innocuous files while there were other people out there busy with bringing an end to a government that found such activity useful.

    Funny side note: my canadian friends, after being turned around and having to cross back to the canadian side a few hours later, were asked by the canadian border person, "why were you there at u.s. customs so long?"

    My friends told them, "they said our friend was a suspected terrorist."

    The canadian border person *laughed*, said "those americans are crazy", and let them on their way without any further hassle.

    1. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, your handle is revolution1901... surely that's enough cause for concern?

    2. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by kevinadi · · Score: 1

      And people wonder why the US is getting left behind.

      If a US citizen is treated as such, you can imagine how they treat non citizen. If my personal possession is NOT considered a personal possession in the US, I won't be getting into the US. In fact, I have been avoiding to enter the US at any cost, even for transit.

      And this is supposed to help you guys... how? No terrorist attack since 9/11? Hell they don't need to attack anymore since it has achieved the desired effect, that is, the whole world is getting pissed at the US. For sure I won't even consider to attend any academic conference in the US.

      Face it. The US is swiftly turning into a despotism.

    3. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      That is unreal. Do you know what kicked it all off? The only thing I've ever had asked crossing a boarder is what I was doing in the other country.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by JanneM · · Score: 1

      In any event, this taught me me a few things: 1) always encrypt entire partitions, including one's root partition, not individual files as I had been doing, 2) don't carry one's private encryption key when crossing borders [or in any obvious way the rest of the time], 3) always keep plenty of encrypted backups in different physical locations so that you can be back up to speed as soon as possible if your laptop is taken, 4) avoid carrying electronics across the border at all if one can't afford to replace the hardware soon afterward.

      Or you can just go to 5) Don't go to US conferences when you can submit to a European or Asian one instead, and if you're doing business with a US company or research collaboration with a US university, have them fly to you, not the other way around.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by garcia · · Score: 1

      The canadian border person *laughed*, said "those americans are crazy", and let them on their way without any further hassle.

      And yet, when I crossed into Canada on a geocaching trip to Winnipeg, we received a *huge* hassle going into Canada and *none* on the return trip into the US.

      On the way in we were detained for full criminal background checks, questioning by lazy border guards who insisted on standing around (in full view of us) doing nothing for 45 minutes before deciding we needed to be questioned, and a full car search.

      All of that would have been fine if they hadn't given the three *criminals* in front of us a free pass into Canada after they (we were easily able to overhear the border guard chastising them) lied about their criminal histories (DUI, prostitution and committing lewd acts, as well as theft). Not only did they let them in they didn't even search their car.

      We were very concerned on our return trip about how awful the US border guards would be. Well, after two questions each and about two minutes of our time we were back in the United States on Sunday.

      I guess everyone has a different experience. Mine? I certainly won't be returning to Canada anytime soon.

    6. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

      If I were you I would re-think the 4 things that you believe your experience has taught you.

      If you follow those items and bring your laptop with you then you will look like you have something to hide. Using encryption will raise a big flag in the mind of any government agent, even if you demonstrate to them that all the data that is encrypted is innocuous.

      The best policy would be to have *no* material hidden at all on your computer - don't use any encryption. If you absolutely must encrypt some material put it on a USB memory stick.

    7. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by revolution1901 · · Score: 1

      If only people with something to hide used encryption, then using encryption would mean you have something to hide.

      Of course, the factors used in making your decision of whether to cross the border with encrypted data change as soon the consequences change. If they can lock you up for not providing the encryption key--as they can in the UK now, I believe--then the moral argument quickly becomes less compelling than the practical one for many people.

    8. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Personally, it made me happy to know the government spent time and resources copying and possibly picking through my innocuous files while there were other people out there busy with bringing an end to a government that found such activity useful.

      Actually, the "funny" part is that they really are trying their best. The sad part is its more likely that they could copy all data on the HDs, but not really look at all the data on all of them for a good long time. I could even envision them keeping copies around for years until they get an automated near AI level search to look through millions of HD images. I'd feel bad for that program/AI. I've tried running some of these software applications for local police department eval. I'm not thriled with idea of doing it in bulk. If we ever come across laptops that have been secured we just send it to the FBI. It takes them months to get to anything. They have a huge backlog of things of this nature waiting to be processed. (I'm talking more along the lines of actual ciminal cases and not just random searches though.) I couldn't believe spending the money or effort looking through. I could see just copying it and detaining the laptop for a week to a month just to seem like you are doing something though.

    9. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you are a lying scumbag (having just made up that story), or you aided and abetted known criminals in comitting a felony, which last time I checked was a felony itself.

      So what do we call you - a criminal or a liar?

    10. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by 14CharUsername · · Score: 1

      We did have some terrorists making plots to attack various buildings. A brave muslim man turned them in because he didn't believe Canada to be an enemy of Islam.

      Several other plots around the world were foiled by good intelligence. So far there have been no terrorist plots foiled by border security. Maybe, just maybe, good intelligence and the government having a good relationship with the Islamic community makes us more secure than stupid border guards?

    11. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you are a lying scumbag (having just made up that story), or you aided and abetted known criminals in comitting a felony, which last time I checked was a felony itself.

      Blame the Canadian border guards.

    12. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check his other posts, he a lying scumbag.

    13. Re:I had my laptop taken at the border by heresyoftruth · · Score: 1

      I live right by the Canadian border. I don't cross up to Canada anymore because coming home is so much of a hassle. It's never the Canadian customs agents that want to rip out my seats, and detain me. It's always fellow Americans.

      --
      Nothing hides evidence like a stew. -Gus Pratt
  48. Friend coming back from Thailand talked about it.. by rthille · · Score: 4, Funny


    So, why wouldn't I just have two partitions, dual-boot, and on the plane make sure it's setup to boot the 'boring' partition?

    Think the customs guys will notice that dmesg shows the drive has more space than df -k does?

    They _are_ comfortable with emacs in a text window, right? That's what _I_ boot into :-)

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  49. They already can and do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're stopped, and the officer asks for permission to search your car without getting a warrent, you have just given them permission to search your laptop.

    There was a recent court case in the past year or so which upheld this interpretation.

    While this might not technically qualify as "automatic", it's pretty close to it since most people blindly give their permission because they are intimidated, and either don't understand their rights, or too lazy to care.

    1. Re:They already can and do by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      If you're stopped, and the officer asks for permission to search your car without getting a warrent, you have just given them permission to search your laptop.

      How did you go from asking for permission to being given permission without the expression of said permission being granted?

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
  50. 5th Amendment by troll+-1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Article contradicts itself by first saying US Customs can confisicate without reason and then saying the a Federal Court ruled it needs at least "reasonable suspicion". I would have thought the latter to be correct according to the wording of the 5th Amendment that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, which is generally held to be at least reasonable suspicion.

    1. Re:5th Amendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google for "laptop judge customs". There was a recent ruling where a guy was stopped and asked to hand over his PC for inspection. Refused, they took the laptop anyway found child pron deleted on the machine and charged him. Brought it to court and the Judge said that not only are customs allowed to do this but encrypting/hiding anything would be classed as obstruction and you would face jail time too.

    2. Re:5th Amendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, sure. He could just "undelete" so it _is_ tantamount to attempting to hide the data.

      That'll teach him for using Windows. Delete your kiddie porn on linux and it is not only deleted, it suggests you _meant_ to permanently delete it.

  51. The data!?! what about the cost of the machine!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Granted while data can potentially have more value than the laptop itself, people can encrypt hardrives, play a game of three card monte with harddrives the clean one in the machine with just enough information to seem like its not new (and thus get slapped with duty charges) and the real HD in transport via UPS/FedEx or something, and the contents on a drive accessible from anywhere on the net. But what about the laptop itself, its not like you can go down to the all night conviencestore grab some milk bread and a replacement laptop. They aren't that cheap, if your on the go all the time, it might be your main/only machine to work on. I personally could not afford to have my laptop taken away, it would leave me computerless... and I would figure about 8 hours before the withdrawl symptoms happen.

  52. Mailing you a clue by four by BeeBeard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Instead of seizing your computer, your person will be seized and thrown in quarantine.


    Have you ever even traveled overseas before? It's like you just lifted this information from an Orwell novel or made it up off the top of your head just to be an anonymous contrarian. Your language is stilted and sounds like something you heard somebody smarter saying years ago: "Your person" indeed. I'm no Richard Stallman, but I've traveled extensively in the Middle East, Lower Asia, and in Eastern and Western Europe. For an American, I do alright.

    Everywhere I've gone, airport and border security has been lax. You are searched, but not invasively so. They ask questions about where you're going and why, but it's not Jeopardy-level stuff. A valid passport does its job for you. Nobody throws you in quarantine for having a cold or pretending to, for godsake. Why don't you do us all a favor and stop bothering us with this unrealistic Checkpoint Charlie crap you saw in a late-night Spike TV Jean Claude Van Damme movie.

    Interestingly, it's only when you re-enter the United States as an American citizen that you are subject to the most harassment, at least at O'Hare and Kennedy. They are not afraid to use dogs to sniff you while you're waiting on your luggage. They will whip out the rubber gloves when handling your property, and they will give you that knowing look like "Give us any trouble, and these can be used for you."

    But thrown into quarantine? Laptop and briefcase-toting American businessmen? Please get a clue.
    1. Re:Mailing you a clue by four by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1
      For an American, I do alright.
      That is in fact why you do alright.
      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    2. Re:Mailing you a clue by four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You're re-entering the US. Try coming in with a foreign passport (mine is British). The experience is offensive. Last year I listened as my British-Asian friend was grilled about how long she'd lived in the UK. The guard didn't seem to understand that she was born here, and was quite happy to tell her she had the wrong colour skin. What are we supposed to do? We need to get through (work) and the guard has control. I'm in no hurry to travel to the US if I can help it.

    3. Re:Mailing you a clue by four by f0rtytw0 · · Score: 1

      I see I am not the only one who notices this. Went to Japan and Thailand this year and I wasn't harassed when entering or leaving either country. I was there during the military coup in Thailand and even then security was pretty laid back. In fact my friends and I some how went around the first security check point with out even noticing.

      --
      this is the most important sig ever! In your face 446154!
    4. Re:Mailing you a clue by four by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For an American, I do alright."

      Try doing alright if you're not an American.

    5. Re:Mailing you a clue by four by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, it's only when you re-enter the United States as an American citizen that you are subject to the most harassment, at least at O'Hare and Kennedy. They are not afraid to use dogs to sniff you while you're waiting on your luggage. They will whip out the rubber gloves when handling your property, and they will give you that knowing look like "Give us any trouble, and these can be used for you."

      But thrown into quarantine? Laptop and briefcase-toting American businessmen? Please get a clue.


      I'd think that the dogs and more searching was first for looking for drug runners. There was a funny comment about traveling with a USB thumb drive in private normally unsearchable parts. If the guy had drugs on him, the dogs would have most likely detected him. They would have attempted to detect internally carried drugs. Alot of mental effort has already been applied by drug runners and other smugglers onto how to bulk carry consealed items across the border. Customs has been searching for those guys for years. Adding electronic smuggling doesn't surprise me. I doubt they'll be very succesful though.

    6. Re:Mailing you a clue by four by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      same here, I'm about to go on a trip and I could have made a stop in the US but decided against that after several very bad experiences. Good luck with your economy that way.

  53. Encryption is classified as Munitions by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Encryption is considered to be munitions and carrying munitions on a plane, or importing/exporting it, could get the FBI horny. http://library.thinkquest.org/27158/legal2.html

    Besides, in this "terrorist age", you're instantly guilty if you're hiding something.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Encryption is classified as Munitions by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Informative

      BZZZZZT Wrong. Commercial Encryption was transferred from the Munitions list to the Commerce List in 1996.

      " Following upon the Administration's October 1 announcement, on November 15, 1996, the President issued the Memorandum directing that all encryption items controlled on the U.S. Munitions List, except those specifically designed, developed, configured, adapted, or modified for military applications, be transferred to the Commerce Control List. " http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Crypto_export/961230_co mmerce.regs

      If you got your hands on Military encryption technology for scrambling your pr0n, then there is prolly a leak at NRL.

  54. nah by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    am I in any way legally required to type / provide my password?

    Nope. But then they're not legally required to let you into the country, either. I suspect if they really wanted to see what's on your hard drive, you'd be given the choice of giving them the password or sleeping in the airport arrival lounge until a Federal judge heard the case.

  55. No, they keep them. by User+956 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You haven't heard Homeland security's new slogan?

    "Welcome to America. All your laptops are belong to us."

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  56. Required to enter *A* password by Sloppy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    My laptop requires a password to wake from sleep or decrypt the contents of my home directory.

    First of all, don't put it to sleep. Turn it off, so that the password they ask for will be a login password rather than some kind of state-restoration password.

    Next, when they ask for a login password, give it to them. Give them a username too.

    Now they log in. They see a very boring directory, which is very easy (and here's the important part: quick!) to search through. They yawn after a very brief investigation, give the machine back, and you go on your way.

    Why did everything work out? Because you gave them a username and password that you don't use everyday, so all your personal stuff isn't sitting in there, needing to be sorted though looking for stuff related to kiddie porn, terrorism, drugdealing, and .. (oh damn, what's the 4th horseman? I forgot.)

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Required to enter *A* password by Dhalka226 · · Score: 4, Funny
      (oh damn, what's the 4th horseman? I forgot.)
      "Music piracy."
    2. Re:Required to enter *A* password by Fzz · · Score: 1

      And if you're really paranoid, the .login script from the fake account can run a setuid program that deletes your regular home directory (you do have backups don't you?), overwrites the files with random data multiple times, and then deletes itself. Likely they'll take long enough probing the fake directory that the real data will be gone without a trace by the time they even start to think they should be looking elsewhere.

    3. Re:Required to enter *A* password by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of an old work place where, after too many idiots got infected with viruses thank to the usual "click yes to anything" mentatlity we had a security audit. So round come the security people with a tool on a floppy which was hard coded to search your "C:" drive.

      Now at the time our machines were running Windows 3.1 with rather small disks (2Gb or less) and as my disk had filled up I was running using one of the drive compression tools (sorry,, can't remember which one !) This tool worked by creating a new partition (or as it was quantly known then "a D: drive") for the data and left a small "C:" partition which contained start up files and the compression/decompression code etc.

      So lo and behold their scanning tool, rather than taking the average twenty minutes it had for my co workers, whizzed through my "C:" drive in about 30 seconds and found nothing. We then have something like the following conversation:

      Them: "That was very fast, have you not got much data on your machine"
      Me "No I'm using so there's not much on the C: drive, The data's mostly on the D: drive. Don;t you want to scann this too ?"
      Them: "Err... We don't know about D: drives our tool only scans C: and it said you were o.k."
      Me (wishing to get back to doing something constructive) "O.k."
      Them (moving on to the next desk) "Thanks for your time"

      Most entertaining.

      The real point being that your advice is totally sound. Most times the people performing the checks will have an automated tool, no real understanding of what they're doing, and will be on a shitty wage. As long as you're pleasant to them and seem reasonable you'll get away with almost anything.

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
  57. Re:Friend coming back from Thailand talked about i by RajivSLK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They _are_ comfortable with emacs in a text window, right? That's what _I_ boot into :-)
     
    ::Pop quiz::
    If the customs officials have no clue what your computer is doing, their likely reaction would be to:

    A) Pat you on the back, apologize for wasting your time, and send you on your way.
    B) Put you in a holding cell while they spent hours attempting to figure out your notebook.

    How does appearing like you have something to hide help you at all? Best to make it boot into an innocuous windows partition.

  58. bad idea by Quadraginta · · Score: 1

    Actually that's a bit dangerous. If they realize you're lying, and can convince a Federal jury that you were, then you can be sent to prison, even if you were concealing something harmless. Just ask Martha Stewart.

    In fact, it's not out of the realm of possibility that they'd rather you lied than flat out refused, since once you've lied and they know it you're on a serious hook, and they can then negotiate with you for what they really want. You're much better off just politely refusing.

  59. hum by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

    "Nice laptop, give it to me!"

    1. Re:hum by Qubit · · Score: 2, Funny

      2- What? No.
      1- You're banned from the US for a year!
      2- Oh my God! Fine, take my laptop! Don't ban me!
      1- I don't even want it now.

      [PA:2005-10-01]

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
  60. I know od harddrives snuck across the border... by Jack9 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A couple companies ago I ran into some Canadians who stole US data then simply put the data on harddrvies that they carried across the CANADIAN border, mailed them to an address, went back to Canada. Went through customs normally, got visas (1 of the guys got delayed 2 weeks for no given reason), and came into the company, opened their package. Viola.

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
    1. Re:I know od harddrives snuck across the border... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Viola.

      What? They became musicians?

    2. Re:I know od harddrives snuck across the border... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like 'A man, a plan, a canal: Panama', except 'Canadians, stolen data, harddrives, the Canadian border: Viola'

    3. Re:I know od harddrives snuck across the border... by NereusRen · · Score: 1
      Went through customs normally, got visas (1 of the guys got delayed 2 weeks for no given reason), and came into the company, opened their package. Viola.
      Someone switched their hard drive for a musical instrument while the package was in transit?? Those homeland security guys are sneakier than I thought!
    4. Re:I know od harddrives snuck across the border... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's trollbait, which means you've been eaten by a Grue.

    5. Re:I know od harddrives snuck across the border... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They mailed themselves a Viola? Are they in a band?

      tard.

  61. No need by jhines · · Score: 2

    The border guards can detain you for 3 days, or until things move.

  62. Here's a Good Question by p0tat03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can I refuse to hand the laptop over, turn around, and go home? If I was heading down 'cross the border and the Americans tried to take my work laptop, I'd probably turn around and go home. I'm pretty sure my boss would rather not have a copy of the product's source floating around god knows where, even if it is encrypted.

    1. Re:Here's a Good Question by russ1337 · · Score: 3, Informative

      >>> "I'm pretty sure my boss would rather not have a copy of the product's source floating around god knows where, even if it is encrypted"
      I was expecting to see plenty of debate around this when I saw the article but no, most people were focused on hiding their mp3's and pr0n....

      I travel the border occasionally and have carried commercially sensitive information that my employer would not like released - i.e tender documents / competing bid information / commercial contracts. I'm 100% sure the customs guy isn't willing to sign the NDE before he searches my laptop either!!

      If someone is serious about smuggling illegal pr0n or ITAR restricted data, they're not going to have it on their laptop. And the Customs guy better be looking for a 'Blue pill' or making sure he's not in a Virtual Machine setup just for him.

      If I was a customs agent I'd be looking for people partitioning half a 60GB iPod and encrypting the other half with the data on it: "hey its a 30GB iPod". Then you better be looking for the the USB stick key-chain, ear rings, cufflinks, wristband, watch etc. Also the customs guy would have to rely on others (NSA) to catch e-mailing that encrypted file to yourself....

      Someone above discussed exporting encryption technology... well if a 'bad man' has their hands on it - its already too late. I'm sure most of you have heard of Truecrypt - its free, open source and available world wide. Truecrypt also offers reasonable plausible deniability. Its also pretty hard to break. Just use that, then hide the data on a CD-R in your CD music album inside some files labelled "me_singing_creative_commons_songs.mp3"

      Sure, they might catch some careless fools, - which goes toward justifying the laws and the processes. But its all just part of the 'security theatre' that Bruce Schneier talks about. It makes everyone feel safe because the TSA are doing something. Its the wrong thing, but its mighty comforting...... (to those that aren't under the magnifying glass.)

    2. Re:Here's a Good Question by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if one can have a USB key that has a "wipe" switch. If a border guard really wants to see it, I'll nuke the drive before handing it over. For work data it's never the only copy, and I can relatively easily arrange for a replacement copy sent once I get to my destination anyway.

    3. Re:Here's a Good Question by ancientt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I use TrueCrypt for my laptop. I don't have a password, I use a key on the work network protected by VPN (if you're not on the local network.) I literally cannot be forced give access to someone without setting up the VPN connection. Anything sensitive is on the encrypted partition. If I have to travel overseas, I will ask that they disable my VPN access until a mutually trusted aquaintance at my destination requests it be restored. I might go so far as to ask that I not know who is the responsible party.

      If my laptop is confiscated, it will be a pain, but not terrible since the encrypted partition is backed up when I'm on the work network. If they must decrypt it, then they have to go through my company's security officer and the company's lawyers. If they take the laptop, then its my company's problem and they can decide if it's worth the legal fight.

      Why? I handle other people's sensitive personal data (and try to keep even that at a minimum on my laptop.) I do what I can to protect the privacy of anyone who has trusted us to keep it private. If I'm dealing with someone who is trying to legally obtain the contents of the drive, they are forced to go through a legal process that protects our clients and by extension myself. If I'm dealing with a personal criminal with a gun, hopefully I can just hand over the laptop and valiently try to run away.

      No lying to officials is necessary. I don't think I'd volunteer to explain that there is an encrypted partition, but if asked directly I can tell the truth.

      If you're worried about it, you could probably set up the same with friends instead of a company and have most of the benefits.

      If the climate is really nasty, then I'll probably just ship the drive. Boot? Sure, that's knoppix by they way, let me know if you need help finding the games.

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    4. Re:Here's a Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If I was a customs agent I'd be looking for people partitioning half a 60GB iPod and

      I'm pretty sure that if you were a customs agent you would not be paid enough to have the training to check for this, nor would you have the time or resources, nor would it do any good. The actual data is stored on a flash card for my Gameboy. You see, I found the smallest (physical), largest (memory) flash card I could, uploaded a ROM on it (and put a 27 hours-of-play-time save state on the flash cart eeprom), put the sensitive data into the dead space on the disc, and swapped the flash card with the inside bits of an actual retail copy of that game.

      Or I got lazy, and I just put the data on a memory card and stuck it inside the gameboy cartridge. Or in the Gameboy Hardware shell. Maybe I needed a lot of space, so I took apart a gameboy pocket, put it inside an original size Gameboy and took the time to move the buttons, etc. Now I can fit an entire stack of memory cards.

      Ok, so now customs has read this and they've decided to install a system that checks the entire contents of every portable game cartridge I bring against a library of rom files? And their x-ray watchers have been trained to identify the inner workings of portable game consoles so they can spot abnormalities?

      I took the binary encoding of the encrypted (and normalized to random character distribution) data, converted it to video static, and took pictures of a tv displaying frames of static. These pictures were part of an art exhibit that was put on in downtown (foreign city) by a no-name art student. The art student self-printed 5 glossy sets of his photographs and sold them, with the proceeds going to charity, and I happened to buy one and am taking it home. If you ask, I'll tell you that I'm not so excited about it now, but I spent too much to throw them away, and I'm going to save them to give to the woman I marry, since I've already decided she'll have to love art and romantic sob stories. (the other copies of the print were donated to a museum, to a website to give away, to the school, and to the charity that received the proceeds, just in case something happens to my copy)

      You think I'll be nervous when I carry them on the plane? Truth is, I befriended Americans at the art museum, invited them to the gallery showing, and gave the photo sets out as gifts to about 10 people. Jacked their wallet for their personal info (or maybe they gave me their address so I could send them a letter!) which I e-mailed to my friends in the US who rob their home once they get back to the states. ...

      It's ridiculous. That may seem involved, but it's definitely something that could be put together in a week if need be. And in real life, you could pretty much e-mail it into the country in an intelligent way and it would never get caught. It is _not possible_ to restrict data if someone with access to it truly wants to do something with it.

      People act like terrorism or data theft or really most crimes are something that can be stopped in action. You can't stop intelligent, determined people from doing something they want to do. The only thing you can do is try to affect their motivation for doing it.

      So why do we, as a nation (under a president?), make it our goal to piss off the rest of the world? You act like negotiating with terrorists is the same as suicide. Suicide is not taking the time to think about what it is that motivates them and whether we can talk them into a peaceful acceptable solution to their actual greivance.
    5. Re:Here's a Good Question by JerryP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your approach should be mandatory for any corporate or government laptop containing customer related data.

    6. Re:Here's a Good Question by boomfart · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about commercially sensitive information, For that to be a problem you would need to have the search done by a dishonest customes officer that has photograhic memory the buisness knowledge to reconise "valuable information", and the contacts with a competitor (who else really cares)that he can trust. More worrying would be the buisness traveler with nothing to hide but several Gig of presentation data to show to a client / customer / trade show getting their laptop confiscated and having to turn up for their meeting with just a smile and a pen.

    7. Re:Here's a Good Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most people were focused on hiding their mp3's and pr0n...

      What else is there to do in a shitty fleabag motel when you're on a business trip? Really, now..

      I'm 100% sure the customs guy isn't willing to sign the NDE before he searches my laptop either!!

      I wonder what would happen if someone tried pulling that. If nothing else, it would set an interesting legal precedent.

      then hide the data on a CD-R in your CD music album inside some files labelled "me_singing_creative_commons_songs.mp3"

      You could do the same thing with PGP or GnuPG, so long as you didn't ASCII armor it. If you're really paranoid, you can back up your public and private keyrings to somewhere else (like your home computer or a USB key at the office) and securely wipe them from your laptop so that there isn't any way to prove that they aren't .mp3 files (unless they make you try to play them - whoops! I corrupted my filesystem!)

    8. Re:Here's a Good Question by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      >>>" If I was a customs agent I'd be looking for people partitioning half a 60GB iPod and" ...." I'm pretty sure that if you were a customs agent you would not be paid enough to have the training to check for this, nor would you have the time or resources, nor would it do any good."

      I worded it that way to avoid someone accusing me of 'helping terrorism' by suggesting to do this, where i'm actually trying to offer a solution... really I am... really... I see you offer ways to curcumvent the process... why do you hate freedom?? (joke)

    9. Re:Here's a Good Question by russ1337 · · Score: 1

      >>> I wouldn't worry about commercially sensitive information, For that to be a problem you would need to have the search done by a dishonest customes officer that has photograhic memory the buisness knowledge to reconise "valuable information", and the contacts with a competitor

      If I worked for Apple and had data about a new product on my laptop (say the iPhone), and this dude went home and blogged on his anonymous blog, or told his brother 'hey cool new iPhone coming out' who then posted details about it, - release date, size, price, features - things not hard to remember... then yeah, i'd be worried. I'd prolly think I had a leak and start survallience on my board and the reporters they deal with....

    10. Re:Here's a Good Question by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I was expecting to see plenty of debate around this when I saw the article but no, most people were focused on hiding their mp3's and pr0n
      Which is odd, because only certain mp3s are illegal and only certain types of porn, and a border guard has no business even looking for the illegal kinds of either of those.
      Frankly, I can't think of anything that could go on a laptop that would have any chance of being caught in any kind of cursory search. What are the odds of finding the terrorist handbook on a 60GB laptop in a 10 minute search. Do you think they would name it "terrorist handbook.doc"? Or would it more likely be "I love apple pie and baseball.doc"? Considering that anybody with internet access could download that same terrorist handbook from the internet once entering the country renders the search useless anyway. The only reason to search a laptop is to make sure it is not physically crammed with explosives or drugs (and some here would undoubtedly disagree with that, too.)

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  63. Laptops, ICE, and pr0n by monstermagnet · · Score: 1

    an overlooked aspect of this is that in the great "Homeland Security" reorganization, Imiigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) somehow got tasked with responsibility for kiddie pr0n. When the local cops execute a search warrant and find kiddie pr0n? They don't call the FBI, but ICE. Testifying in Federal Court at plea bargains and sentencings in the great Midwest? ICE agents.

    I hazard a guess that the laptop snooping allows ICE to bump up its arrest stats, and thus their budget. That it's concentrating on something pretty much completely orthogonal to goal that would make sense is merely a side effect of the Dubyah administration's vision, leadership and foresight.

  64. NO! Dont encrypt your whole HDD by spagetti_code · · Score: 4, Informative

    "This is why you should encrypt your hard drive."

    The trick to hiding something is to make it look innocent.
    Encrypting your whole hard drive just screams "kiddie porn" or
    "terrorist's handbook here" to any agent that looks. And the first
    thing he will do is ask for the password. You'd better hand
    it over or get ready for a quick trip to Gitmo.

    Instead, have a normal drive with a normal OS install. When
    they scan the 200,000 files on an average drive they'll find
    nothing unusual. Certainly no .jpg or .avi's.

    But on that drive have a file named "corrupted.doc" or
    something like that. It is really a Truecrypt file/drive.
    You mount it manually when you log in and all your important
    stuff is in there.

    If they log in and search and manage to find "corrupted.doc"
    (which they wont be looking for), they will ask what it is.
    You can say it was an important doc file but it got corrupted
    and you were hoping to find someone to fix it. It sure will
    look corrupt thanks to Truecrypt not putting any sort of signature
    at the start of the file.

    1. Re:NO! Dont encrypt your whole HDD by nacturation · · Score: 1

      But on that drive have a file named "corrupted.doc" or
      something like that. It is really a Truecrypt file/drive.
      You mount it manually when you log in and all your important
      stuff is in there.


      Or a hidden file named pagefile.sys. "Gee, must be some kind of system file or something, officer."

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:NO! Dont encrypt your whole HDD by apathy+maybe · · Score: 1

      One problem, if you meet a smart official they will look at your list of programs and go, "Umm...", when they see TrueCrypt. Then they might well ask you to produce the password and a file that it can be used on. But of course you can get some plausible deniablity ("I swear that was the only encrypted file!").

      --
      I wank in the shower.
    3. Re:NO! Dont encrypt your whole HDD by D4MO · · Score: 1

      My place of work, a top 5 US Invesment bank, is implementing a global wide policy of whole HDD encryption for *all* laptops. Hopefully whole HDD encryption will become the norm.

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    4. Re:NO! Dont encrypt your whole HDD by orielbean · · Score: 1

      Why don't more big buisinesses simply use a VPN instead of keeping everything on your laptop? Almost everywhere you can get an internet connection, and if some fuckstick takes your stuff, the credit reports of thousands can remain in gentle slumber... I also work at a finance buisness where a laptop was stolen, and the mess that ensued was ridiculous! And there is still no VPN-only rule...

  65. DHS Reasoning by duplo1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    My father is an immigration attorney (MFIAIA) near the Canadian border and we were chatting about this several weeks ago as it occasionally happens to his clients. Apparently, border agents largely trawl through people's email inboxes searching for evidence of work outside the scope of their current visa. People entering the US on valid visas have few options but to submit their laptop or face denial of entry and possible revocation of their visa and denial of pending applications.

    Even if people utilized file or disk level encryption, I wonder if they would force people to surrender encryption keys and passwords. I suggested that he advise clients to look into that sort of solution, but it may not do any good. It would also be interesting to know how and where the information is stored and for how long.

    1. Re:DHS Reasoning by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      Apparently, border agents largely trawl through people's email inboxes searching for evidence of work outside the scope of their current visa.

      Okay, so where the fuck do they get off doing this to citizens too?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:DHS Reasoning by Technician · · Score: 1

      People entering the US on valid visas have few options but to submit their laptop or face denial of entry and possible revocation of their visa and denial of pending applications.


      I wonder what they do with laptops with no configured e-mail client? I've gone completely to web based e-mail. When I clear my cache, history, and cookies, then compress my drive, there is little evidence left of e-mail.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  66. Genius by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

    This will work like gangbusters if you're running an OS on the laptop that actually employs access rights (*cough* Linux *cough* *cough*). Then there will be no practical way to access your personal, home directory files from the dummy account anyway. Unless security personnel ask for a root password (unlikely) you should be fine.

    1. Re:Genius by bky1701 · · Score: 1

      "Unless security personnel ask for a root password (unlikely) you should be fine."

      Security personnel: "Why would I want to login as a part of a tree?"

      But for added safty, you can always rename root to something else and make a new (non-admin) account named root. Or you could run your real OS as a VM that doesn't show up on the boot menu. Even if they know what root is, it's unlikely they will think to look for that.

    2. Re:Genius by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you tell all those Windows 98 users! Goddamn idiots!

  67. Re: What kind of moron would check his laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You don't get out much - we've just had a wave of "no carry on luggage" as a sideshow to The War On Moisture.

    Interestingly Singapore Airlines now has little notes in the dinner sets appologising for the plastic knives 'where required by local administrations'

  68. Recent Case Says Differently by logicnazi · · Score: 1

    In a recent court case the judge in fact ruled that the border search exemption does not apply to laptop searches. I think it was on deciscion of the day or something.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

  69. ... but why???? by lagartoflojo · · Score: 1

    What the article does not make clear is WHY they have to search laptops. The article says something about the "U.S. government need[ing] to protect its borders"... from what? What are they looking for? Jüri Lina or Noam Chomsky ebooks? Bookmarks to rense.com or to whatreallyhappened.com? Software to remotely activate Russian nuclear weapons? I mean, you can't import cocaine or weapons in a laptop! (Unless, of course, you put them IN the laptop, but then it's the X-Rays' job to find them in this case, and there would be no reason to even boot the computer...) And I don't think it's the TSA's job to be looking for pirated media (which can be very hard to prove that are illegal; what if those Buddha Bar mp3's you have are a backup of the CD you left back home?) I don't understand.

  70. Non Issue... Easy answer: thermite by sjs132 · · Score: 0

    Refer to the following article:

    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/17/152 1200

    Make some type of thermite packing around HD... Press button if gard asks for laptop... done, no more sensative data.

    Be sure to warn the guard first that your company's privacy policy covers the computer so they don't think your a TERRORIST or Kiddie PORNSTER...

    Seriously, this is just FUD because of the election.. I'd like to see the NAMES of a company that can say their equipment was confiscated for no reason and they lost the only copy of something... I'll go one step further and state WHY would you keep trade secrets on a laptop! I bet LAPTOP THEFT occures more frequently then US Border Guard confiscation.

    Just a tool to inject more fear of the current government into the sheep. Hopefully folks are smarter than that here... Oh, its Slashdot.. nevermind.

    REMEMBER: PHYSICAL SECURITY is the FIRST line of security. A LAPTOP is not secure by any means! So DO NOT trust your most secure data to be left on it.

    Here is a quiz... What is more likely:

    1) So company XYZ creates new global changing product and G.I. Joe takes laptop... Next year the government is releasing new dept of defense underware that doesn't chaife.

    2) So company XYZ creates new global changing product and G.I. Joe takes laptop... Because company was a front for $$$ laundring and had financial records of bank accounts of terrorists, etc..

    3) So company XYZ creates new global changing product and G.I. Joe takes laptop... Because company was an independent contractor to Government funded research and employee was trying to smuggle product home for personal gain or export. (terrorists...)

    4) So company XYZ creates new global changing product and competitor does distract-switch @ airport/border. company goes bankrupt because competitor went to market faster.

    5) So company XYZ creates new global changing product and laptop is stolen for a quick sale for $50 & "rock" to the local head thug who then turns around and uses it for a child porn server.

    If you said 4, I think you might have a clue. Look at HP... corporite espionage is alive and well.

    So, Lesson is to keep ALL important data secured and encrypted on servers with Encrypted PTPT between client/server and LIMIT the access to ONLY THOSE THAT NEED, not the every saleman in the company that might cross a border.

    So much FUD... so little brains.

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  71. great business model by misanthrope101 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Since the government doesn't need warrants/probable cause/oversight anymore, it would be easy to set up a business to sell "confiscated" laptops second-hand. With no oversight, there is no need for record-keeping, no way to see if someone is abusing their power, etc. Just yell "You hate America!" at anyone who questions how you bought your new house. It's worked so far. The only people who believe in old-fashioned due process are apparently terrorist appeasers, if you believe the dominant Republicans and Fox News. Can anyone think of an argument FOR government oversight, warrants, and due process that would be considered persuasive in the current political environment? We seem to have given up altogether on the idea that government is dangerous to freedom.

    What happened to all the "conservatives"? Am I the only conservative who actually believes in limited government? That may be the most tangible benefit of a Democratic victory in an (any) election--the conservatives would be (ostensibly, if dishonestly) anti-government again. Right now we're stuck with the dichotomy that government-funded healthcare is creeping totalitarianism, but government torture is innocuous. Strange world we live in.

    1. Re:great business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Andrew Sullivan, _The Conservative Soul_.

    2. Re:great business model by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1
      What happened to all the "conservatives"?
      We became libertarians.
    3. Re:great business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Am I the only conservative who actually believes in limited government?


      REAL conservatives support our government in times of war. The war on terror demands that we do whatever it takes to protect ourselves. People like you who claim to be a conservative but then want to give terrorists and illegal immigrants free access to our country are the real problem.

    4. Re:great business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Am I the only conservative who actually believes in limited government?


      you, sir, are a republican with no power, which is why you actually think this way instead of just saying it to manipulate, well, people just like you.
    5. Re:great business model by bytesex · · Score: 1

      You seem to be contradicting yourself - you want both oversight and due process _and_ limited government. In other words, you want stuff to be on the books, but no people to perform duties described in there, or do you want no stuff in the books, and therefore no people ? Or do you want people to give you due process, but not everyone else, so that there can still be limited government ? Or do you want limited government, but due process and long queues in airports ? See, I don't get it. Please explain.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    6. Re:great business model by smchris · · Score: 1

      Since the government doesn't need warrants/probable cause/oversight anymore, it would be easy to set up a business to sell "confiscated" laptops second-hand.

      Been there, done that? I believe the term is "government auction". You can probably find some with web sites.

      You hear about police stations that are furnished with confiscated equipment like third world nations. I wonder whether they purchase them at the auctions to make it all nice and legal, but if anyone has first-hand experience.....

    7. Re:great business model by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      >> You've just described why I think Libertarians are nuts;
      They want lots of roads, but apparently everyone must build their own.
      In a Libertarian society, there can be no infrastructure because everyone is a self-sufficient renaissance man/woman.

      Though I would go along with no standing army, and every citizen spends a year in military or community service training for free college.

      All Libertarians contradict themselves all the time. I know I'll get labelled as flame bait for this -- but it is absolutely true, and unless they realize their great logical flaw, they will always have NO power. It's kind of like the Republicans being against government and then getting office... you cannot have a modern society without government. The more you ignore the infrastructure and what we actually need government for, the more it will be abused.

      Right now, our government seems to think it functions as a military resource procurement system to support multinational business. It doesn't see itself as a system that creates prosperity for its citizens, or education, or health. Does anyone see where this will lead? If government doesn't provide SOME safety net and protection for the health and jobs of its citizens, we all will have to stop work to get our spinach tested... people will lose confidence in a marketplace that allows Eli Lilly to put mercury in immunizations (to save money), and then helps that company cover it up.

      Libertarians have not helped frame the right arguments. They should have been screaming about the loss of Habeus Corpus and Media Consolidation ... not fricken' hand gun laws. Freedom of speech is so much more important than the right to bear arms -- because in an information economy, if you don't have the right information, you don't even know who is taking your liberty. By the time they come for the guns of the Rugged Individualists, it's too late.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    8. Re:great business model by dreamer-of-rules · · Score: 1

      There is no contradiction in wanting limited government AND due process and oversight. Giving any branch of government unchecked power is senseless.

      It's like putting brakes on a car so that it doesn't go over a cliff.

      By the way, what we liberals want is sensible security. Like checking containers coming into the US at the ports, and scanning luggage, but not wasting peoples time and liberties by confiscating laptops, shoes, and nail clippers. By God, why do these Republicans do the terrorists' work encouraging baseless fear in America and savagely stripping freedoms and checks out of the Constitution? (free press, freedom of religion, due process, habeas corpus, checks and balances)

      --
      Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts.
  72. Customs Thugs, Harassment, and Drugs by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Most of the harassment I've been hit with internationally was coming back to the US. The Israelis liked to paw through everybodys' bags (this was in the mid 80s), and I remember them spending a lot of time on another passenger who had cassette tapes of music they didn't approve of. And of course the Singaporeans and people like that have signs up about "We kill drug dealers". The Moroccan customs thug was really annoyed at us for having one fewer bag than our tickets indicated, and my French wasn't good enough to explain to him that it was the airline's fault and we'd be perfectly *happy* if they brought us the other bag. And then there was flying into Miami from the Bahamas as a young shaggy bearded guy on a one-way cash ticket.

    On the other hand, I took a ferryboat from Egypt to Jordan, and while the customs process still involved them poking though your bags, they were friendly about it. The tables where they handled the locals had a big pile between them of confiscated contraband, mostly videotapes and hash. They didn't give the people a hard time, just took their stuff, and of course presumably took it away at the end of their shift to go sell it, because that *is* the reason you get a job as a third-world customs inspector.

    The worst I've seen border-guard thugs do was drag some Turkish guy off a train at the Germany-Czechoslovakia border; I don't remember which direction he'd been travelling, so I don't know if it was the Germans or Czechs being racist about Turks. It was early-90s, post-Communist, so it wasn't quite like the Soviets any more, but East European border guards were still getting jobs for the fun of shouting at people rather than confiscating contraband.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Customs Thugs, Harassment, and Drugs by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you've been globetrotting quite a bit yourself. It's funny you should mention people trying to take items at the Egypt --> Jordan passage.

      I remember I was planning on boarding a flight to Jordan at the Cairo airport, and one gentleman was absolutely convinced that the USB flash drive I had on my keychain was some sort of knife (this was years back when they were far less common) that he was more than willing to take from me. After several brief exchanges in my unsophisticated, awkward Arabic I was finally able to plead for a demonstration. I had to power up my laptop and insert the key in and out of the USB port in a coital fashion before he finally believed that I wasn't preparing to stab everyone in sight with my tiny, squarish keychain.

      The Egyptians pull that crap while you're doing the tourist thing, too. While we were sightseeing at Luxor, my girlfriend mistakenly took some pictures of the insides of a tomb in the Valley of the Kings. The camera was snatched up by one of those cheesy monument policemen and was not returned until I slipped the man two 20 pound Egyptian notes. It wasn't exactly a fortune when you compare it to dollars, but having to bribe people to get our property back left a bitter taste. Shokrun, Egypt.

      Years ago, before Zayed died, Airport officials at the Abu Dhabi airport made me stand quiet and motionless in a corner for 2 1/2 hours while my passport sat inside the caged counter area of one of the passport checkers. I was given no explanation as to why this happened. The only thing I could think is that they did it because they could.

    2. Re:Customs Thugs, Harassment, and Drugs by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      Good to know, I'm going to Egypt in a month. Was it standard procedure to go through your photos? Was it random, or did they see your girlfriend take the picture? It would suck to lose any of the pictures that I'm going for. I plan to have my baksheesh pocket primed and ready, just in case, and I won't likely snap pictures in prohibited places, but would you recommend that I use the hotel computer to upload my pictures regularly? I'd rather not go through the hassle, but losing all my pictures (not to mention the camera) would be a bigger hassle.

  73. Penn Gillette's Screen Saver by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Back in the mid-90s, after one of the airline bombings or the non-bombing crashes that the Feds liked to pretend might have been terrorist, the airport hand-luggage inspectors were starting to insist that passengers do random things with laptops (usually having the passenger them on, or insisting that the rent-a-gorilla had to turn them on), Penn Gillette had a computer magazine column where he ranted about stupid computer tricks, civil liberties, and similar issues. He suggested that an obvious screen-saver or equivalent to have your PC play at startup was a large digital time display ticking backwards.


    I think the Feds snarled at him, but at least it was back before they could throw people in Gitmo.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  74. Canadian Customs Harassment by billstewart · · Score: 1
    I once travelled to Canada to go to a political/economics conference. The Canadian officials saw that we had brochures with us, and were quite concerned that some of them discussed ordering books, because after all, if we were carrying material like that to a conference, we might be engaging in business or trying to sell things, and that just wouldn't do without lots of special licenses. We weren't, and eventually convinced them of that.


    I used to do business with a Vancouver-based tech firm in the late 80s. One of their people was a dual citizen, and he'd occasionally smuggle lab equipment back and forth across the border in his car because he was tired of having it held up by Canadian customs when he shipped it formally.


    My other dealings with Canadian officials have been relatively uneventful. On one trip we had papers saying our cat had all her shots, but she was hiding under the car seat asleep when we got to customs and they didn't notice her. I did get pulled over for speeding by a cop who on foot - he was standing by the side of the road with a radar gun, catching people coming over the hill from out in the country when they got to the town speed limit - but he decided that since we had a US rental car, the paperwork would be too much work to be worth the bother.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  75. backdoor's always open by eeeeee · · Score: 1

    That's why I set up a phone home feature on my laptop with remote access and security at every point. Once a thief/tsa/whoever gets into the OS, assuming they connect it to the internet, I can track the laptop down to an IP address, destroy data, mess around, etc...

  76. It's not banned by YowzaTheYuzzum · · Score: 1
    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20641599-1702 ,00.html

    US denies Vegemite ban

    AUSTRALIANS travelling to the US can breathe easy. So can the 100,000 or so Australian expatriates living in America.

    The US government today dismissed media reports it had banned Vegemite.

    "There is no ban on Vegemite," US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) spokesman Mike Herndon said.

    Media reports at the weekend claimed American border officials were confiscating Vegemite from Australians as they entered the US.

    The FDA, charged with policing America's food supply, has not issued an "import alert" to border officials to halt the import of Vegemite.

    Mr Herndon said the FDA was surprised by the media reports.

    The controversy centres on folate, an ingredient in Vegemite.

    Under US regulations, folate can be added only to breads and cereals.

    "One of the Vitamin B components (in Vegemite) is folate," Mr Herndon said.

    "In and of itself, it's not a violation. If they're adding folate to it, boosting it up, technically it would be a violation.

    "But the FDA has not targeted it and I don't think we intend to target Vegemite simply because of that."

    Joanna Scott, spokesperson for Vegemite's maker, Kraft, reportedly has said, "The Food and Drug Administration doesn't allow the import of Vegemite simply because the recipe does have the addition of folic acid".

    But Mr Herndon said, "Nobody at the FDA has told them (Kraft) there is a ban".

    To eradicate any grey areas or potential regulation breaches, Mr Herndon said, Kraft could petition the FDA, something other food manufacturers have done.

    While many Aussies living in the US rely on visiting Australian relatives and friends to bring them a jar or two of Vegemite from Australia, the product is available in some US supermarkets.

    The price slapped on Vegemite, however, is tough to swallow.

    A tiny, four ounce jar of Vegemite sells for around $US4.80 ($6.33) in US supermarkets.

  77. Hontestly who cares by MrJynxx · · Score: 1

    I personally don't care if the custom guys want to take my "executive data" . We actually force our laptops to save by default to our home directory on our intranet. if we don't have the laptop joined to the network it will prompt with a few errors, but we require everyone to connect via citrix to our backend so they can save those important documents to our network.

    If we actualy save data to our personally laptops, they'll have to get through out lawyers to get at the data legally..

    I'm Canadian so we still have rights, if you use your corporate laptop for personal use that's your own problem.. but we'll still protect you (aka. the corp lawyers)

    In the US, can't comment.. but I use my laptop for pure corporate use, so good luck trying to find anything that is ACTUALLY incriminating.. take the laptop, eh, no big deal... I'll just order another one..

    I'm sure everything is hackable, but if that were the case why give anyone in the business laptops?

    MrJyynxx

    1. Re:Hontestly who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If we actualy save data to our personally laptops, they'll have to get through out lawyers to get at the data legally.

      "We're DHS and ICE. We don't have to care about legally."

      Once your box is in government hands, you've lost control. Period. You'll never be able to force them to disgorge what happened to your "evidence" while it was in their hands.

      Hey -- laptop, evidence. Why it's just like Communion. Bread and water are now body and blood, but there's no way you can do chemical or forensic tests on the stuff to make sure it's really changed. But it did. :-)

  78. I work at the border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I work at the Border at a International Airport. We don't "just" take a laptop. Its a massive amount of paperwork, custody logs and signing every single time some one has control of the laptop. If it was taken, its been my experience that it is related to 1. Evidence of a crime, be it technology transfers, money laundering or not manifesting goods that are being imported. 2. Kiddie porn. You would be floored to see how many times I nail some pervert coming back on a "business trip" with this, this dreck on his machine. So before you start with the tin foil hats or accusing us of taking these machines home, you find out who and what the person is making the claim

    1. Re:I work at the border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      All the extra paperwork sounds nice in theory, but if something gets misfiled, how can John Q Public get his computer back? I used to be supportive of the T.S.A. until they harassed me for no good reason, then trashed my car at the border. No apologies. Had to look for my passport and driver's license. Laptop dumped on the back floor. D.M.V. documents from the glove box ended up on the back floor. I spent an hour getting my car back together. I've traveled for over 10 years to 18-19 countries. Never treated so rudely. I went to the office to make a complaint and was patronized. Interviewed in the front lobby with agents passing by. Abolish the T.S.A.!

    2. Re:I work at the border by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      I've traveled for over 10 years to 18-19 countries. Never treated so rudely.



      Well, in that case, you haven't been travelling long enough. What you describe sounded only slightly more rude than the treatment you'd have gotten when entering the (now nonexistent) German Democratic Republic. Maybe the border guards there would have been slightly more polite, as you were probably bringing (Western) currency into the country.

    3. Re:I work at the border by Builder · · Score: 1

      Why the fuck do people insist that the US is OK and things are alright, just because they're better than the communist regimes of the past?

      Being the second fattest girl at the bar does NOT make you skinny :)

  79. Re:Sounds like a job for... TWO words... by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    FUCKING ASSHOLES!

    How long before Blackberries and other PDAs befall this same bs?

    This ought to or might ramp up sales of Dell Latitudes. (I dunno about Inspirons and Precisions...). With the Latitude, it's easy to leave out two screws and slide out and swap the hard drives out (compared to many other l/ts that require removing the keyboards or opening up the chassis...). Just buy an extra caddy from Dell, configure a PERMANENTLY-dedicated disk for the border nazis and then when you're done with your main disk, slip in the just-for-the-border-nazis disk and when they need a boot up, boot it up. If you're brazen, have the boot up image say something nasty.... (Be SURE to isolate the other disk. If these rent-a-dummies DO confiscate it, hopefully they don't thing to rummage your pockets.) This just underscores that in computer THEFT (by burglar with a mission or agent with a warrant), it's NOT the hardware so much as the DATA and the DISK you care about.

    But, that just opens up the REAL question: If this is a government action (vice a border agent action) is it the LAPTOP or the HARD DRIVE the government wants? If they're taking specific hardware, it's probably because they're PROFILING their marks, maybe looking for suspicious devices that they thing held or will hold a bomb. Maybe in reality, only devices with offending MAC addresses are targeted in some cases. Still, in this case you better back up your main disk and expect to lose it with the JFTBN disk. They'll just go into your purse or pocket and demand you surrender it, too. So, I suspect they are after data, not laptops. Or, the guards want the laptops and the agencies want the hard drives...

    Now that this scenario is posited, they may as well just electronically confiscate a COPY of the disk using:

    http://www.logicube.com/markets/forensics.asp

    or

    http://www.newfreedownloads.com/Windows-Utilities/ Backup/Acronis-True-Image-Corporate-Workstation.ht ml

    and STOP STEALING PEOPLE'S HARDWARE and risking the WRATH of the populace.

    I mean, in this day and age, short of a concern of EVERY hard disk and machine being digitally booby-trapped, there is no sane reason for taking people's hardware when for $1,500 on a Logicube, amortized across the 3,000 or 4,000 machines they might have warrants to sieze and search, they minimize the risk of SHEER outrage on the part of visitors, citizens and others. But of course they won't do this shit to diplomats, because they've got immunity. I've said before, and I'll say again: You can, with a warrant, CLONE my disk and copy my papers (If you bring a hand/wand scanner), but if you TAKE my shit, you better lock my ass up FOREVER and throw away the key cuz as long as I am mobile and able... err, umm, better not say that again.... sheesh...

    How can I get diplomatic immunity from another country so as to not be searched and screwed with? How can we ALL do it? Oh, we can't.

    I suspect next that in-flight nationality & customs declaration forms will have a section for passengers to, "under penalty of perjury, a $100,000 fine and imprisonment up to 15 years affirm/swear/attest that they did not encrypt, digitally booby-trap, or erase their disks nor switch them out with nor secretly give them to other passengers in an attempt to avoid a hard-drive road-block...."

    Well, if this becomes a REAL problem and keeps up, I imagine concerned companies will forbid employees' taking company laptops overseas, will force them to rent or go with disposable laptops, and installing self-destructing hard drives which are used ONLY for VPN authentication/access/work and then disposal before leaving a foreign country. Individuals might follow suit.

    More crap for the people to get worked up over (if it gets out of hand)...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  80. Re:Required to enter your password? Digitally? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    I mean, anal probing by by finger or by laptop? Having a laptop crammed up my ass would be quite a shocker, especially if the battery blows up. Give a new meaning to any Lithium-Hide-dried batteries...

    Butt, I don't want Dell Hell in my ass, nor Gateway having a gateway into there. Nor the Sony Boys and their assploding battries...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  81. +1 informative on the MQR standard, and I'll raise by MarkusQ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Thank you. If I had mod points I'd give you one, but instead here's a link to the case you mentioned.

    --MarkusQ

  82. Re:Dumb move USA.. MOD UP! by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Please, somebody mod this one up...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  83. Re:Required to enter your password? Digitally? by Cyberax · · Score: 2

    There's a joke in Russian cryptographers community: "The speed of password cracking is exponentially proportional to the temperature of soldering iron [crammed in someone's ass]".

  84. Drinks by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Either the Thug Classico, which is a Pint Glass with ice almost to the top, Absolut Mandarin poured in just over half way, then Red Bull to top the glass off (About 2/3 of a can.)

    Funny, when I was in the Army we used to drink the same thing, only with unflavored vodka.

    And without the Red Bull.

    Or the ice.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  85. Returning home from family vacation in Vietnam by Slaveway · · Score: 1

    When I returned home from my last Vietnam vacation the customs guard asked about what I had done on vacation and had me power up my laptop and show him our vacation photos.
    This was in July of 2003. I was very suprised by his request to look at my vacation photos. The guy didn't even blink at the small bundle of DVD movies I had purchased in HCM city (Siagon)

    --

    http://www.Slaveway.com
  86. Re:Required to enter your password? Digitally? by davidsyes · · Score: 0

    Well to the Komrade who extracts the SEEKRETS: KONGRATS, SOLDERER of Fortune...

    But it STEENKS in here, Komrade...

    Dasvidanya... Have some Tranya...

    Don't ddrop de soap, Komrade...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  87. do you follow your own definition? by misanthrope101 · · Score: 1
    Could you give me the names of a few "real conservatives," so I have a basis for comparison? Most of the Republican leadership in power now criticized Clinton heavily when he tried to kill Bin Laden. They said it was a case of "wag the dog," and that he was doing it just for political reasons. Our nation was even then fighting against terrorists, and congressional Republicans, and down to talking heads like Coulter and Rush Limbaugh failed to support the sitting president.

    You can go as far back as McCarthy, and he openly undermined President Truman, flouting his authority on multiple occasions while troops were dying in Korea. So, since Republicans believe that Democrats are traitors, and Republicans aren't "real" conservatives because they don't support the President if he isn't from their party, who are the conservatives?

    I've never heard, seen, or read your definition before, actually. I've always heard conservatism grouped with skepticism of government power, concern for fiscal responsibility, and things like that. How long have you had this definition of "real" conservatism? Does it extend to the last President, or did you come up with this only recently? Words sometimes do change meaning and usage over time, but rarely does the shift in meaning coincide so neatly with one politician's term of office.

    Did you support the last President? Would you support a President Hillary Clinton, or a President Obama, or would you undermine them at every turn like the Republicans did to Bill Clinton during his tenure? Are YOU a "real" conservative by your own definition? Or are you a political shill? I really am curious.

    Secondarily, are you saying that conservatives would always support the sitting President in time of war, even if they thought he or she was wrong?

    1. Re:do you follow your own definition? by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      (Off topic response)

      Forgive me for intruding on the dialogue, but as a real conservative, I couldn't resist.

      To hell with "supporting the president" or "supporting the government". What kind of a belief system is that? Not sure what you mean by "undermine", but if the government is enacting policies I disagree with(about 90% of the time in the last 15-20 years) I'm not going to "support" them just because they have a letter next to their name

      You're right about the fundamental values of conservatism. Fiscal restraint, and limited government intrusion primarily. The Republican party abandoned these principles entirely. They lost my support with the first couple of budgets the Bush Administration came forth with, and earned my scorn with their wars and blatant intrusions on individual liberty.

      Of course I don't study all 500+ people in Congress, but the only real conservative I know of at the national level is Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, although Senator Voinovich(sp?) of Ohio(?) is fairly decent as well.

      This whole "conservative == Republican" started with Rush Limbaugh. By blaming all of the evil in the world on some ill defined concept of "Liberalism" which essentially meant "Democrat" in his perspective, there was an inevitable backlash of self defined "liberals" criticizing "conservatives"(meaning Republicans by reciprocity).

      That's where we stand today. A ridiculously bitter divide among the people based on meaningless labels and 2 political parties which seize upon this divide by a tenuous association with them. Meanwhile the two parties work in tandem against the interests of the majority.

      It's called "divide and conquer" and we're well into the latter stage.

  88. No problems here by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    I've traveled back and forth between the US and Canada a number of times.... sometimes en-route from other destinations like Oz.

    I've never had a problem but I have been worried.

    Worst case I had was comming back from Oz via LA and being terribly sick. IMHO they should not have let me on the plane, I was infected and infectous with a bad cold/flu.

    Yes I had something to declare... I had over $30,000 to declare. When I arrived in Calgary I had not filled in my little something to declare ticket. When I walked up to the customs officer I said I'd like to speak to a supervisor. I was told no way... do I have something to declare? I said Yes I do and I haven't listed it because I'm too sick and besides you can't clear it anyways. Then I was asked how much? Am I over the limit? I said I'm pretty sure I'm over the limit. Its over $30,000 and I'll need a certified cheque for the GST because that alone will be more than $2000 bux. So she says (get this) "I think you need to see a supervisor".

    About 2 minutes later the supervisor showed up and I explained I'm an importer and these are commercial goods and I'm way too sick... can we do it Wednesday or Thursday? Do you have a safe room to store it?

    Funny. Yes they did. I felt better by Wednesday and phoned them and got the exchange rates and figured out the GST and got the certified cheque and made it back to the airport. They were very curtious. They didn't even open any of the boxes. 2 hours later my courier picked up the stuff and all was fine.

    I don't know about others... I travel on a business Visa. My company is a registered importer/exporter and we keep our nose clean. I've just never had any problems.

    Of course, I don't own a lap top and I wouldn't keep emails on it anyways. Emails stay on my mail server.

    What many of you chaps write scares me. Last time I went to Oz I rented a machine in Oz. I don't like laptops anyways. However I was thinking of getting a toteable and maybe now I won't. What happens if you try to carry a hard drive through customs?

    Maybe this is a business opportunity. Leave your peecee at home and rent one here. eh? Instead of rent-a-car, rent-a-peecee. Hmmm....

    -------------

    BTW - I have had merchandise inspected. There has never been a problem. I have all the paperwork and I often clear myself to save the big bux. THe closest I came to a problem whas when they looked at a photocopied manifest from a supplier in California. These are suppose to be originals. Well - they had the boxes and could have looked in them. The parts were as stated. Perhaps over 10 years with a fully wiped nose does make a difference.

    1. Re:No problems here by belmolis · · Score: 1

      I think that the key thing here is that you were entering Canada. In my experience, Canadian customs and immigration are always pleasant and reasonable. US customs and immigration are much more likely to be a pain in the neck, and this has been true for decades. It isn't due to 9/11.

  89. Surely it's not just about the data.... by jamest_adelaide · · Score: 1

    ...it's about the laptop itself, which could be/contain a bomb. Just a guess

  90. now, yes, but why maintain it? by misanthrope101 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The need for paperwork only comes with oversight. That is tied in with probable cause, the legislated, mandatory need to justify your actions, and basically the tacit assumption that your position puts you in a position where you can abuse your power, so you should be watched closely. Take away the probable cause, shield everything behind a wall of secrecy that you can't breach because "that might help the terrorists" and you have people who a) can take stuff, b) without having to justify it to anyone outside their office. How would complaints be filed, and to whom?

    The approach the White House is taking to, well, everything, is bound to trickle down, because everyone in the world would find it convenient to be free of oversight and accountability. If the position of the upper government is "trust us, and no, you can't check, because that would help the terrorists," then that incredibly convenient pretext for hiding everything they do will trickle down the ladder.

    THAT, not an irrational hatred of Bush, was why the civil libertarians yelled so loudly about the White House redefining torture, due process, habeus corpus, and everything else. If one government agency can just sign a document to lock you up for as long as they want, exempting themselves from judicial or legislative oversight, redefining or ignoring laws they don't like, then well, hell, EVERYONE wants to do that, and it will trickle down to your local police department eventually. It happened with the war on drugs, and the war on terrorism is a lot more useful. Ever hear of civil asset forfeiture? Ostensibly, it was a critical tool to go after the drug dealers, but over 80% of people whose assets (cars, houses, boats, even cash) were seized WERE NEVER CHARGED. This happened under Clinton, too. Government abuses power. That is a truism, and it doesn't stop being a truism just because you voted for a particular administration. The "conservatives" have gotten so excited about being able to remake the world however they wanted that they have become the very totalitarians they claimed to fear from liberalism.

    But back to the police and those laptops. You seem to think that there is some independent life-force or truth-force in existence that will spontaneously, without any legislative mandates, cause the police departments across the country to do the right thing even when no one is watching over their shoulder. That is naive to the point of hilarity. People don't handle power well. Would you like to give high school teachers the ability to strip-search any student at will, with no legislative oversight, and just assume that they won't abuse that? Do you hate teachers? No, and I don't hate cops either, but if you remove oversight that was provided by due process and probable cause, and excuse them from having to justify their actions before a judge and risk censure, then their authority will be abused for gain. It's just human nature.

    1. Re:now, yes, but why maintain it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's just human nature.


      absolutely correct. this is the fundamental message of the bible, too. people are fundamentally self centered and selfish and fail to "love others equal to themself." funny how some donkey riding guy knew this all too well but so many today, 2000+ years later, don't grasp it.

      this failure is the reason the world is the way it is - and it isn't pretty.

      the good news is that god will intervene and show the folly of such selfishness.
    2. Re:now, yes, but why maintain it? by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      "love others equal to themself." funny how some donkey riding guy knew this all too well but so many today, 2000+ years later, don't grasp it.

      And 2550 years ago, some under-tree-sitting guy knew that you should love everyone as yourself, because 'they' are not distinct from 'you'. The sad state of the world can be explained by the failure to follow any of the many teachings that would make things other than they are.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    3. Re:now, yes, but why maintain it? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      But at least checks and balances have actually been pretty well accepted and implemented within a number of governments, including ours, up until recently. Right now we're backsliding. Not only due to terrorism, either; the confiscation laws surrounding the war on drugs are obviously unconstitutional, too, but for some reason nobody cares.

    4. Re:now, yes, but why maintain it? by operagost · · Score: 1
      And 2550 years ago, some under-tree-sitting guy knew that you should love everyone as yourself, because 'they' are not distinct from 'you'.
      Funny. Just the other day, I was beating a guy with a steel pipe and I distinctly remember not feeling a thing!
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:now, yes, but why maintain it? by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      Funny. Just the other day, I was beating a guy with a steel pipe and I distinctly remember not feeling a thing!

      Delusion can be powerful. Maybe we should conduct a /. poll to see how many of us think that we could beat someone with a steel pipe, without feeling anything.

      I am sure that you are not serious, but if you were, then our society would consider you to be a psycopath (IANAP), one who is so deluded as to be "diseased".

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    6. Re:now, yes, but why maintain it? by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      Where's the "+1, wake-up call" mod when we need it?

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  91. You emphasized the wrong part by mrchaotica · · Score: 3, Insightful
    No person shall... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

    It does not apply only to US citizens, and it does not apply only within the borders of the US. The US government shall not do this to anyone, anywhere. Full stop. End of fucking discussion!

    Why the fuck is this so damn hard for everyone -- including federal judges -- to understand?!!!

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  92. Re:The REAL truth - About Ubuntu's Success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you knew ubuntu's growth was being driven frome *somewhere*, didn't you?

    bguug... border guard's ubuntu user's group...

    amerikkka doesn't seem like a qualitative difference from the present, just a quantitative difference.

    this is sad.

  93. Re:Friend coming back from Thailand talked about i by rthille · · Score: 1

    Well, Windows might get me into much more trouble, since it would be obvious that I'd stolen Microsofts source code and ported it to a PPC mac!

    Of course, I could run an OS-9 or OS-X partition just the same. hell, I imagine OS-X with a primary user with a 'hidden' home directory would be fine. According to my friend, customs was looking for illegal copyright materials and spent about 20 minutes browsing his (windows) laptop.

    Given how easy it is to swap drives in some machines, you could just swap out the hard drive, unless they go thru all your prosessions very closely...

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  94. Depends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are a US citizen, they cannot deny you entry in the US, I would imagine. The only reason they could is if they are not satisfied that your documentation proves you are who you are. Highly unlikely.

    They could presumably confiscate anything that you tried to bring in on reasonable ground - "It's encrypted, so we have to take it and study it..." and if they ever found anything before the statute of limitations ran out, I suppose you could be charged. I also suspect there's a "put up or shut up" procedure, but given the cost of lawyers, I suspect a new laptop would be chepaer.

    For Canadians going into the US, they can do whatever they want to you and you object at your peril. Having said that, they seem to be more anal about 30-year old juvenile convictions than laptops. The "moral turpitude" clause can cover just about any arrest. They can ask if you've been "arrested", not just "convicted".

    For foreigners coming into Canada, the usual hassle I've seen is "are you coming here to do work, bringing commercial samples"? They often have to educate Americans that Canada is not yet the 51st state, and petty bureacracy must be served before you can do sales, demo's, trade shows or consulting.

  95. If you ignore the fnord, it won't eat you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Jesus H. Christ on a pogostick, you folks can't look past your own navels. This is news?

    I was prepared for this *three* years ago. Here's a clue: This isn't about politcal ideology anymore. It's about power, and survival. The day you stop thinking in "left/right" terms that colorize things the way the powerful in American want it, will be the day you suddenly realize just how much we have lost, what we still stand to loose, and what sheep we have been, slowly being lead to slaughter by "our own kind".

    The upcoming "Recession" is accelerating. Two years ago, the housing market was "hot"; and there were warnings EVERYWHERE that it was a bubble. Now, the average citizen is overextended on credit AND a mortgage, AND is working furiously robbing Peter to pay Paul (or in this case, borrowing from MasterCard to pay the Bank Mortgage). The goverment is up to its ears in debt; and if that debt was recalled (by say, oh, the Japanse, or the Saudis, or one of the many many many other countries that buy our debt but secretly hate our guts), we couldn't repay it, because "we've" floated the US dollar way past the point of no return. All around me I can see people being laid off, jobs literally "leaving", and the number of homeless are growing each day. I also see a few people driving cars that cost more than what my grandparents paid for their house, and my grandparents had to pay a 30 year mortgage like everyone else; what does that say about the cost of living now? 50 year mortgages are now being accepted; how much longer before it's a 99-year lease and you die in debt, passing the debt to your children? The M3 doesn't exist anymore, because according to the fed it "doesn't represent any data of value", but the reality is that the M3 actually can guage how bad inflation will be because it indexes the amount of money loaned out (ie. debt sold) over time.

    The Great Depression had approximately one-quarter of all people in the United States unemployed. What happens to a country when it passes more than half of all people unemployed? How can you keep a bank solvent with it has a default rate on mortgages that exceeds more than 1 in 3, but only 10% of its assets can be liquified on demand? Hell, would there even be someone to buy a house, when no-one has work or money? You do realize that the FDIC has STOPPED insuring bank savings accounts years ago, right? That nice, fat 401(k), well, you did remember that there was no guarantee of safety in it, right?

    Much of this has already been discussed on Slashdot, yet none of you seem to remember what you read. You call me a troll, but I say you are worse: you are ignorant, and that is something that you can cure but choose not to do so.

  96. Re:Friend coming back from Thailand talked about i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First sentence in his post was:

    So, why wouldn't I just have two partitions, dual-boot, and on the plane make sure it's setup to boot the 'boring' partition?

    Great reading comprehension skills there...

  97. Very old news by Sithech · · Score: 2, Informative
    At least as far back as the 60's, customs could and did stop cars returning from Mexico that 'fit the profile' of drug smugglers and conducted very invasive searches, including disassembly. Seats were ripped to pieces, tires dismounted, and so on. All legal and with no recourse, even if nothing was found. If you were a 20ish guy with long hair in a VW, there was a fair chance of this happening.

    Customs has been known to accidentally destroy small aircraft on arrival if they are suspected of carrying drugs. No liability for them when nothing is found.

    The authority for the searches is 19 USC 1467.

    The authority for lack of liability for the damage caused is "sovereign immunity", as reference in this case: Mid-South Holding Co. v. United States, which involved property damage sustained by a vessel during a search by the United States Customs Service and the United States Coast Guard ("Customs Service"). The Customs Service was called in to search the fishing vessel ABNER'S CHOICE on a tip that she was involved in narcotics trafficking. While the agents discovered no contraband, they were alleged to have unplugged the vessel's bilge pump during the search, which caused her to sink the following day. The vessel owners brought suit against the United States under the Suits in Admiralty Act ("SAA") to recover the value of the lost vessel. The United States gained summary judgment on the grounds that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the court concluded the United States enjoyed sovereign immunity in this case.

  98. Not necessarily! by PontifexPrimus · · Score: 2, Informative

    To quote from TrueCrypt's website: TrueCrypt can run in so-called 'traveller' mode, which means that it does not have to be installed on the operating system under which it is run.
    This means you do not have a program list entry if you do not install it; all you have to do is keep the TrueCrypt.exe somewhere on the drive or on a separate thumbdrive (you should probably rename it to something like spellcheck.exe). But even if you do install it, you still get plausible deniability with TrueCrypt's two-container-model: you can create a secondary encrypted container within an encrypted container, so that you basically get two different contents depending on what password you use to open it. If you want to hide your PR0N stash, just put tax stuff, bills and personal data into the other container and if someone asks you to uncrypt this file, just show them the "sensitive data" you're protecting. It is impossible to prove the existence of a second data set.

    --
    -- Language is a virus from outer space.
  99. EnCase can read/decrypt PGP? by franc24 · · Score: 1

    It was said in another thread here that certain custom have been using EnCase software to make an image of a HD and to read its data. So I went to EnCase website and I read the .pdf there. It says: [...] Encrypted Volumes and Hard Drive Encryption: EnCase can analyze and acquire mounted encrypted volumes, such as PGP and DriveCrypt, and give examiners full access to data on hard drives that are wrapped with encryption technology, such as SafeBoot. What does that mean? "give examiners full access to data on hard drives that are wrapped with encryption technology"

    1. Re:EnCase can read/decrypt PGP? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      AFAICT, it can mean one of only two things:

      1. That all these commercial products have backdoors for government use.
      2. That the people writing this software have access to encryption knowledge several years ahead of what's in the public domain.

      In the case of 1, probably the best thing you can do is use an open source product. However, if 2 is the case, then I think a VPN to a secure network where the actual data is is the best bet.

    2. Re:EnCase can read/decrypt PGP? by zman01 · · Score: 1

      No way EnCase can do this. I call marketing BS. If this was possible, everyone could hack PGP Disk and other commercial products by just buying a license of EnCase? Yeah, right.

    3. Re:EnCase can read/decrypt PGP? by zman01 · · Score: 1

      They are talking about MOUNTED volumes. Everyone can do that - access the disk after the password has been provided and a drive letter was assigned. BUT, if the disk is unmounted - no way.

  100. and then you DoD wipe the HDD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to make it unfeasible to get the data from the HDD.

    Or did you forget that?

  101. please somebody make up a linux command line joke. by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

    ..scenario.

    am i too late?

    --
    --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
  102. no more US trips by Tom · · Score: 1

    One more reason on the growing list of "why to avoid the USA when travelling".

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  103. Re:Friend coming back from Thailand talked about i by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have told this story a few times on /. but here it goes again

    Last year I went with my wife and son to Adelaide for a short holiday. Coming back I left my laptop in the checked in luggage (having too much stuff to carry on board). At the time it only ran Mandrake. The laptop was fully charged because I always ran it on mains power.

    Boarding time arrived and thw airline announced a delay to "change a wheel". I could see the plane right outside the windows. Adelaide airport is pretty small. No wheels got changed.

    We got home and I got the laptop out. The battery was totally flat. After all the warnings not to use a laptop during takeoff and landings did these guys leave my laptop running in the cargo hold? Did they do that because it doesn't have a "start" button?

  104. Erased it all by certsoft · · Score: 1

    Going to New Zealand and back so I used "Secure Empty Trash" on my laptop to get rid of all the horse porn, am I safe? :)

  105. Fun at the border by rlp · · Score: 1

    dd if=/dev/urandom of=secrets.bin bs=1024 count=1000

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  106. There's an "easy" solution... by cartman94501 · · Score: 1

    Before you cross the border, re-Ghost your laptop to its original state, and carry all your important data on a thumb drive located in your asshole.

  107. It just keeps getting better and better... by singingjim · · Score: 0
    First Vegemite and now this. Next they'll be confiscating my briefcase in a briefcase full of kiddie porn..

    Seriously, this is just more hoax crap. I've never seen so much garbage posted as serious news.

    --
    Terrible karma and aiming lower, which in this environment of one-sided reason, is higher.
  108. A more simple answer to why this happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Barring all rediculous notions of conspiracy or paranoia, let's talk about the guy at the Airport who bears the safety of the entire country upon his weary shoulders. Let's call him Earl.

    Earl is usually a male between the age of 25-45 years old. Earl does not have a broad college education and isn't too likely to own a computer. Earl probably lives near the airport in a bad neighborhood.

    Earl spends six hours a day on his feet, shuffling air-travellers through metal detectors at a pace of fifteen or so per minute. Hundreds a day. If he has seen the same person twice, he wouldn't know it. Earl works five days a week, and gets some overtime during the holidays. He makes about 10-12 bucks an hour.

    Earl's training was a ritual cleansing of his spirit. They showed him videos of plane-crash sites, audio from hijackings and the 9/11 replay loop interlaced with tips on 'recognising suspicious behavior' and 'how to spot a fake ID' followed by about a list of 1001 places to hide a bomb.

    So, here we have an exhausted, middle-aged man who's basically been told that it's up to him to defend the country. Whether he believes that or not, he knows he better not screw up.

    There you are: A Young 20-something with your laptop, a little nervous for flying and jittery on caffiene, perhaps unconciously looking around a little too much because it's been a long wait. God help me, maybe you're a little tan...

    What's an Earl to do?

  109. Pop the harddrive? by Gorkamecha · · Score: 1

    But I suppose I'm thinking like a criminal here. Pop the harddrive, and if they give you grief about that..you give them the blank loaded one. I'm not so much concerned about them searching my laptop, outside of kiddie porn there is little they can prove right there on the spot is illegal. (Oh, my mp3 collection is based on my CD collection at home, as is my DVD collection and my certificate of proof of license is right there under it). I'm more concerned about my work laptop walking away with my latest 1 gig project report on it never to be seen again. Shame this sort of thing never happens to people important enough to affect change....

  110. Be blunt: Customs operate outside the law by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Customs is considered to operate outside the bounds of law because they are determining if someone is allowed in to the country. If they weren't technically outside the country already, the visitor or immigrant would already be in the country and there would be nothing for Customs to do.

    They've taken advantage of that for decades.

    I personally have had my car trashed because of the jackboot mentality of US Customs, and much, much worse. I know others who have had the same happen to them.

    And there is NOTHING we are legally allowed to do about it from out of country.

    Totalitarian is as totalitarian does, no matter how much the US prattles about "freedom" or "democracy."

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  111. GRUB to the rescue by Java+Ape · · Score: 1

    I use the graphical login screen in GRUB, and fly fairly frequently. I think I'll make a custom version, just for use in airports. How about a nice shot of the twin-towers burning, with the login text in Arabic, and maybe some choice jihadist slogan at the top of the screen? On login, I could have the system display messages like:
    SCANNING for radio transmission devices. . . . . DEVICES FOUND
    SCANNING for evildoer dongle . . . . . . . . . NO DEVICE FOUND
    SCANNING for secured network connection . . . . . . .NOT FOUND
    SECURITY COMPROMISED. BOOTING INTO DECOY LINUX
    Then boot into a plain vanilla Linux with power-puff girls wallpaper. For good measure maybe I should have a large secondary partition filled with completely random data.

  112. My nephew wants a new computer for Christmas by toriver · · Score: 1

    That's your reason, right there.

    So don't carry important information in PCs when crossing the border, just like you don't carry too much (or too little) money when walking in South Central, L.A.

  113. It's the Laptop that Allows Access by OldSoldier · · Score: 1

    What would or could customs officials do if you just brought in a hard drive? Without a computer handy to view the contents of the hard drive, would the confiscate it out of hand or would they let you in because it was too burdensome to view the contents right there? If any one knows the answer to this question, I'd love to hear it.

    I suppose it's somewhat related to the encryption question... if your data is encrypted, do the custom officials ask for you to unencrypt it so they can see it?

    As others have posted, I'm more concerned about loss of data rather than letting others view it. So... encryption is not a solution for me. Backup copies are a solution, but maybe this hard-drive only trick can work.

    --
    when will the right to bear arms be extended to include a right to bear computers?

  114. Jeez, this is soooo freakin' simple.... by BarnabyWilde · · Score: 1

    ...pop the hard drive out and pack it elsewhere.

    Duh.

    BWilde.

  115. Don't take data with you -- DL it after arrival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple solution.. if air travel gets much more restrictive, it'll be easier to just prepare a Ghost image of a drive with all your business required programs/data, leave it on the company servers, and arrange for a rented laptop at the destination. Scan it of course to ensure it isn't trojanned, then download your drive image. Route around the airport authorities as damage..

  116. Funny?...Yes... by Vr6dub · · Score: 1

    Informative?...Are you fucking kidding me! What ass hat moderator did this shit. Do us a favor and shoot yourself. Also, take the time to read the moderator guidelines. I understand it's not law but not adhearing to those guidelines ruins part of what makes Slashdot so great. Can someone with points please mod the parent properly.

  117. Tips, Cameras and so on by BeeBeard · · Score: 1

    Oh yes, Egypt is a very service-oriented nation. If you know the word "baksheesh" then you're already there. Those tips better flow to the guy who helped lug your bags, to the man at the hotel who told you about a nice place to eat and so on! If you're American or British, do not exchange out all your money into Egyptian Pounds. For the purposes of "baksheesh", many people are really, really pleased about getting dollars or GBP--the latter of which is often worth 10 times the native currency and holds its value a lot better. Practice saying these words, spelled phonetically, in Arabic--they will come in handy:

    la shokrun ("la shoke-ron") - it means "no thank you"

    la - means "no", pronounced as in the word "ma" or "hah"
    shoke - as in the word "spoke" or "bloke"
    ron - as in the word "gone"

    My girlfriend was spotted by the monument police. I didn't mean to trivialize them earlier--Egyptian policemen carry prominently displayed automatic weapons, and in the nicer parts of Cairo (such as Zemalek), you will see them literally at every street corner. The monument officials are deliberately made out to be less threatening looking, but they are no less willing to beat ass. I personally witnessed one repeatedly punching a bedouin in the head for getting too close to the tourists at the Pyramids. These people really don't mess around.

    You will find that the tourist sites are surprisingly unaccommodating to tourists. You do a lot of walking, climbing, and in some cases a lot of baking out in the hot Egyptian sun. Last I was there, I climbed inside the largest of the pyramids by ascending a rickety vertical ladder that was perhaps 30 - 50 meters long. One misstep and your vacation gets much less enjoyable.

    The thing with photographs and the monuments is that you can take pictures of some, but not at others. My girlfriend was spotted taking photos in a tomb and the "no pictures" policy was loosely interpreted by the official as a "permanently confiscate the camera" policy. Like I said, it took money to fix the problem, which was kind of crappy. There may not be a place to put your camera if you've transitioned from a "pictures OK" to a "pictures not OK" area, and depending on the circumstances, they may balk at the idea of your even having the camera out in the first place. Something small and easily concealed is the ticket, and yeah, I would absolutely upload shots on a daily basis. I did it with my laptop--every day I would dump shots onto the hard drive. At the very least, you're insuring against losing your pics if the camera gets damaged or "lost".

    If you're going to the Pyramids or to Luxor, hire out a personal guide from a travel company. Seriously. The better ones have Egyptology degrees and will tell you anything you want to know about what you see. Due to the exchange rates, your dollars, GBP, Euros, or whatever else will probably stretch very far in Egypt, and you might be surprised by how cheap the guides can be. The guide becomes the "designated picture taker" and "camera carrier" too ;)

    Hope that helps. Have a great time!

    1. Re:Tips, Cameras and so on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I've never been in Egypt nor do I plan to, but I've seen 2 interesting movies on the pyramids you may enjoy:
      * Ancient Khemit - Land Of Osiris, by Stephen Mehler - http://www.gizapyramid.com/BIO-Mehler.htm
      * Ancient Egyptian Technology - Giza Power Plant, by Christopher Dunn - http://www.gizapower.com/
      Both also wrote books on these subjects. In one of the 2 movies the 'tip' thing was also described. They wanted to see a 'non-tourist' area and had to give some money to get there. Maybe your picture being prohibited is related to the power plant theory. What did your girlfriend take a photograph of?

    2. Re:Tips, Cameras and so on by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tips! I'll try to upload my pictures, although I won't be lugging a laptop. At the very least, I'll bring several memory cards to mitigate the risk.

  118. Re:Friend coming back from Thailand talked about i by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

    If you are were running linux you could check /var/log/[syslog|messages] etc and see when the laptop was booted and shutdown...

  119. Re:Friend coming back from Thailand talked about i by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    You didn't look in /var/log/messages?

    Rich

  120. Resisting to impluses... by MagnusE · · Score: 1

    Sometimes, listening to such stories, I want to become a terrorist myself!...
    Do not underestimate the fact that some people are just a couple of steps before doing something criminal, and the rest of the community, with their actions and the lack of trust, just pushes them to do it!

    Sometimes I go into supermarkets dressed up rather untidily. The guard watches me, follows me, then he does something else... It never occurs to me of stealing something except for those moments, really!...
    We could make the cost of ridiculous safety measures higher than the cost of their lack somehow, in order to stop such safety insanity...

    --
    Fortune Rota Volvitur
  121. Re: What kind of moron would check his laptop? by pixel_bc · · Score: 1

    Even during that entire time, nobody stopped me from bringing my laptop...

    Oh well. Security rocks.