Domain: 209.85.173.104
Stories and comments across the archive that link to 209.85.173.104.
Comments · 65
-
Re:For those that don't get the joke
Crichton botched the science that he was trying to criticize. I think that's a much stronger condemnation than the presence or absence of any given piece of university-derived parchment. The first article disputes his 0.8C prediction, pointing out that the trend he attributes his predicted rise to should actually have a bit of a cooling effect. Here is a list of other, specific rebuttals to Crichton (primarily his novel "State of Fear"), in case you're interested.
I followed your links, they were all critiques of his science-fiction book, and none were critiques of his talk to Congress. Science-fiction books are supposed to be wrong on some accounts. Aren't they? Isn't there supposed to be a measure of fiction within them? Isn't fiction something that's made up? And isn't something that's made up -- something that's very likely to be wrong -- in some way -- somehow? Name me a couple of science-fiction books that haven't "botched" Science to some degree, I'd be curious to know what you'd find. These books probably exist, but I really doubt they would be considered "science-fiction" in the general sense of the term.
Degrees in medicine and biology do not make one an expert on climate change.
That's the thing, he never even claimed to be an expert on climate change. His talk to Congress was on "the politicization of Science", a pretty decent talk you're either unwilling to read, or unwilling to critique. The guy did a Post Fellowship on Public Policy. He's critiqued his own field, Medicine. Your implied assertion, that a published scientist in one or two scientific disciplines, and a Post-Fellow in Public Policy, shouldn't be allowed to do Public Policy critiques across other scientific disciplines, is scary. Sometimes, some of the best critiques come from outside the inner academic sanctum of a particular field (although that's not always the case, obviously).
And may be, if he had arrived at the committee hearing, and entered a copy of his science-fiction book -- as *his* testimony, then you'd have a point. That being said, he didn't do that. He gave a short talk on "the politicization of Science", a written copy of which I already gave you the link to.
-
Goodbye webserver...
Looks like the webserver got bombed. Here is the cached site as of the 25th of October. Google Cache: http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:d-yiI5QQzfQJ:www.optoma.co.uk/PicoIndex.aspx+http://www.optoma.co.uk/PicoIndex.aspx&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=firefox
-
Re:For those that don't get the joke
Focusing on whether the consensus view is necessarily correct or not has nothing to do with the irrefutable evidence that the climate is changing and the likely probability that humans are causing it completely or contributing to it.
Crichton predicted future warming at 0.8 degrees C.
So taking out that "irrefutable" phrase out of your statement since Michael Crichton (in his book or in real life) wasn't even trying to refute that part of it in the first place.
We're left with:
Focusing on whether the consensus view is necessarily correct or not has nothing to do with [...] the likely probability that humans are causing it completely or contributing to it.
...and yet your statement still doesn't make sense. The "likely probability that humans are causing it completely or contributing to it" is your conclusion. We know that. We know Crichton disagreed with it. You can't use the fact that Crichton disagreed with you to discredit him. That's just silly.The third was when he wrote State of Fear and testified before congress. I never read the book, but just to watch the kind of anti-intellectuals like Inhof invite a science fiction author to be regarded as an expect on climate change.
Michael Crichton spoke on "the politicization of Science". Here is the google-cached written reproduction of that talk (which I found on his site, but his site is currently down). And here is the educational background of Michael Crichton. That being said, don't just rely on his educational background. And don't rely on the fact that he was seen testify in front of an idiot. His talk speaks for itself. It's quite short, and to the point.
Crichton graduated summa cum laude from Harvard College, received his MD from Harvard Medical School, and was a postdoctoral fellow at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies, researching public policy with Jacob Bronowski. He taught courses in anthropology at Cambridge University and writing at MIT. Crichton's 2004 bestseller, State of Fear, acknowledged the world was growing warmer, but challenged extreme anthropogenic warming scenarios. He predicted future warming at 0.8 degrees C. (His conclusions have been widely misstated.)
Crichton's interest in computer modeling went back forty years. His multiple-discriminant analysis of Egyptian crania, carried out on an IBM 7090 computer at Harvard, was published in the Papers of the Peabody Museum in 1966. His technical publications included a study of host factors in pituitary chromophobe adenoma, in Metabolism, and an essay on medical obfuscation in the New England Journal of Medicine.
-
Re:Mirror (useless w/o pics though)
-
Does your company have a legal department?
I don't know the details of what you're trying to accomplish here, so I can't comment on the legality, but it sounds like you think there are some issues, and you _and_ your boss need to discuss it with your company's lawyer (if you have one.) And you need to explain to your boss that terms of service can be legally binding, and can have copyright issues, and also that web-based data providers not only change data formats enough that your lost programming time might cost more than buying the data you need, but also that they can look for automated scraping and hand you bogus results.
The robots.txt files were originally designed to tell robots to stop doing heavy-duty queries on sites that couldn't handle it, but also to keep outsiders (especially spammers) from abusing content. And your code needs to follow robots.txt, because many many sites have robot traps that do unfriendly things to unfriendly visitors ("Nice lookin' robot you got there - be a shame if anything happened to it!") - or do userfriendly things to them.
-
Re:Quantity vs. Quality of executive experience
Hey dumbass. You can ramble on and on and and attempt to fillibuster all you want. It doesn't change the fact I posted above the actual text from the actual 2008 DNC rules that proves 100% I'm 100% right and you're still 100% wrong, and looking more ridiculous with each additional post.
I posted the ACTUAL text from the ACTUAL 2008 DNC RULES, dumbass.
Don't try quote me no USA Today or MSN 6th grade reading level mini-summaries.
I posted links and text from the ACTUAL 2008 DNC RULES.
The word "superdelegate" is a press-invented nickname for elected and party officials that recieve automatic invitation. The word "superdelegate" does not appear in linked 2008 DNC rules. Go look at THE ACTUAL 2008 DNC RULES....
The term "superdelegate" is nowhere the ACTUAL 2008 DNC RULES. Officially, there is no such designation as "Superdelegate, you dumbass. The actual 2008 DNC rules say they are all delegates.
-
Re:Quantity vs. Quality of executive experience
Here's those 2008 DNC rules from pdf and google cache links, Billy Bob Sumdumass..
13. FAIR REFLECTION OF PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCES
A. Delegates shall be allocated in a fashion that fairly reflects the expressed presidential preference or uncommitted status of the primary voters or, if there is no binding primary, the convention and/or caucus participant
What part "fairly reflects the expressed presidential preference" are you not capable of understanding?
11. TIMING OF THE DELEGATE SELECTION PROCESS
A. No meetings, caucuses, conventions or primaries which constitute the first determining stage in the presidential nomination process (the date of the primary in primary states, and the date of the first tier caucus in caucus states) may be held prior to the first Tuesday in February or after the second Tuesday in June in the calendar year of the national convention. Provided, however, that the Iowa precinct caucuses may be held no earlier than 22 days before the first Tuesday in February; that the Nevada first-tier caucuses may be held no earlier than 17 days before the first Tuesday in February; that the New Hampshire primary may be held no earlier than 14 days before the first Tuesday in February; and that the South Carolina primary may be held no earlier than 7 days before the first Tuesday in February. In no instance may a state which scheduled delegate selection procedures on or between the first Tuesday in February and the second Tuesday in June 1984 move out of compliance with the provisions of this rule.
Here's some others, too. You remember the rules that say Florida was not allowed to move it's primary up to Jan 29th 2008? Yeah. Them. The ones Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama signed a pledge not to campaign in Florida because Florida broke the rules set by Democratic Party regarding the primary schedule.
Clinton broke her word, campaigned in Florida anyway, and then tried to force Howard Dean to change DNC rules and count Florida delegates that were derived from a process that that made Obama honored his word while soiled herself? Howard Dean and The DNC refused to change the rules the Clintons had tantrrums demanding the rules be changed for them
-
Re:Useless Windows Update
Browser exploits come out daily, and they can get in and out the firewall. The firewall is nice, but it won't save you.
Slirpie is my favorite.
-
Re:All this sounds nice, but there's another side.
What do you have to back anything up with?
You say:
"I'd take a totaled car over massive internal injuries."I say:
I'd prefer a cheaply replaced, ruined bumper to a totaled car.Small collisions that do not harm people (regardless of what type of car they are in) cause massive damage to "modern" cars, and little damage to older cars.
Go look at vehicle repair costs.
Here's a source for you, INS Institute:The Institute reported the results of its most recent round of low-speed crash tests designed to measure how much damage is done by common low-speed impacts. The IIHS assessed 20 small car models and concluded that car makers are still not doing enough to reduce the repair costs from what should be minor fender benders. The Institute blames the car makers for not making adequate front and rear bumpers to protect the vehicle from damage.
Google cache can get you through the subscription.
(Bonus: My car is at the top!)
Again here: http://ohsonline.com/Articles/2008/09/About-That-Hybrid-LowSpeed-Impacts-Cost-Plenty.aspx
Again here for minivans:
http://www.iihs.org/news/rss/pr122007.htmlLow speed collisions should protect people with seat belts. Mid speed collisions should throw in the air bags. High speed collisions should throw in crumple zones.
But what we get is bumpers falling apart and not working as bumpers in a fucking 3 MPH test.
We get crumple zones completely collapsing in low-mid speed collisions. -
Re:interesting, but...
shoulda googled before i posted:
*snip*
According to these studies, a new coal fired power plant will release between 1.96 (PLC) and 2.09 (DOE) pounds of CO2 per kilowatt hour of operation. For our report, we assume that any given coal-fired power plant will emit 2 pounds of CO2 per kilowatt hour.
A power plant with a one megawatt (1,000 kilowatts) name plate capacity will produce the equivalent of 8,760,000 kilowatt hours annually at full operation -- that is, 8,760 hours multiplied by 1,000. At this rate, such a plant would emit an estimated 17,520,000 pounds, which is the equivalent of 8,760 short tons or 7,947 metric tons of CO2.
*snip*
from : http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:3Lo6hNKC2UwJ:www.seen.org/pages/db/method.shtml+co2+per+kilowatt+hour+coal+powerplant&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=au
so these devices will suck up about 1.5 months worth of C02 emissions at a miniscule amount of the energy. awesome. -
Re:no, they were balanced on a yearly basis
Only if you used the surplus from the Democrats' favorite flat tax called social security and medicade. Wait -- aren't flat taxes regressive? Funny how if you compare the tax burden in Communist China with that of the US (add in the 15.3% for SS), China looks like us. Here's a nice graph showing Clinton's so-called balanced budgets.
If you make $100k in the US, you'll spend (burn) 37% of your income in taxes and SS. Scroll down for the tax chart. SS is 15.3% of the first 102k or so. Anyway. the government will take your taxes AND the SS and spend it on whatever crap it wants. Then, when all the baby boomers who spent rather than saved the SS surpluses retire, they will tell us younger folks that SS needs to be raised to 30% and that it's fair because they paid into the system. Of course the part they will be neglecting is that they didn't really pay into the system, they paid and then spent on other purposes every extra nickel rather than setting it aside for retirement. -
operation TIPS - actually alive and 'well' ;(
BRATTLEBORO -- Likening a new program to recruit 1 million citizen informants to Soviet-style repression, Sen. Patrick Leahy, said Tuesday he will have some tough questions for Justice Department leaders spearheading the effort.
"I find it kind of scary," Leahy told the Reformer Tuesday about the little-known Operations TIPS, the Terrorism Information and Prevention System, which is set to launch next month.
According to a government Web site, TIPS "will be a nationwide program giving millions of American truckers, letter carriers, train conductors, ship captains, utility employees, and others a formal way to report suspicious terrorist activity."
"We used to laugh at the old Soviet Union idea where everybody reported everybody else," said Leahy. "
... We don't need to have it happen here. "The Vermont Democrat, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he will challenge Attorney General John Ashcroft on the need for TIPS when Ashcroft appears before the committee next week.
Federal officials are releasing little information about the program. But the Web site, www.citizencorps.gov, indicates Citizen Corps is a component of the president's USA Freedom Corps program introduced by Bush in his State of the Union address in January that called on Americans to donate 4,000 hours of volunteer time.
"Citizen Corps creates opportunities for individuals to volunteer to help communities bring together a network of volunteers and first responders at the local levels," Debbie Garrett, a spokeswoman for the Federal Emergency Management Agency in Washington, told the Reformer Tuesday.
One of the five parts of the Department of Justice Program includes Operations TIPS, which the Washington Times described Tuesday as "a national reporting pilot program scheduled to start next month in 10 cities, with 1 million informants -- or nearly 4 percent of Americans -- initially participating in the program."
while ashcroft started this (and he's now gone, thank god!) the TIPS programs seems to still be covert and alive.
in the last 2 or 3 years, I've noticed a LOT of snooping by my apartment management. practically every 3 months there is some 'reason' to enter my apartment. even though I quote them calif civil code sect 1958 (which I've almost memorized, by now) they find other ways to get around it. mostly its a 'fire hazard' or 'fire inspection' which is the apartment equiv of 'think of the children' or 'terrawrist(tm) scares'. if you say 'fire hazard' you can force your way in, even without any cause or warrant. I even called a few lawyers to check on this and they advised me that, while technically I have a right to 'quiet enjoyment', the landlord can ALWAYS find local ordinances that let him come into my place.
for over 10 yrs, I've lived in peace and mostly at the same address. in the last 2-3 yrs, though, the spying has grown 10x or more.
search around for 'operation TIPS' and you will be surprised what you see. its real and its even a citizens group that CAN USE LETHAL FORCE (non-police units, mind you) if they even THINK there is a 'just cause' for homeland 'defense'.
scary shit. the UK is no place I'll ever even land at (for international trips) but the US is a close 2nd to the new world order of orwell
;( -
Re:And it works, too
Google cache of this if any one wants
-
Re:Proton Exchange Membranes
Hmmm. According to this url, http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WMC1DDZdIAIJ:www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/97/97cct/cct_pdf/97CCP1_2.PDF+standard+generator+using+coal+efficieny&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us&client=firefox-a, current coal is at 40% efficieny, and the industry is shooting for 45%.
If johnson really is 60%, they have the nod. But of course, the PEM is the issue. -
Re:Once had life, but no more
For starters, could you explain your solution to the Mach 5 problem? (No, I know you don't know what that is, I'm using it to illustrate my point, vis., that you are talking bollocks about something you know nothing about. Now go away and google and read for a few years.
Here's the explanation (google cached) of the "Mach 5 problem" I found on Google (which really does appear to be unresolved):
Motu Mach 5 problem with Logic 7
Nov 19 2006, 12:06 AM
hi i recently did a re installation of the mach 5 on my G5 computer running the latest version of logic 7. it loaded up fine and asked me to specify a location for the mach 5 sounds folder which i did. however i am getting an error message . . .Hmm... what does that have to do with mars?
Ah... you're probably referring to the problem described in this result, which consists of quotes from this article.
Certainly wouldn't seem to be a well known topic for the general populace. Without quotes in the google search I didn't even get any relevant results in the first page (although adding the word "Mars" might have helped).
-
Re:www.centralkydating.com
-
Google cache
Here is the exhibit page cached by Google. No images, though, since images are not stored by the Google cache.
-
Fake Trade / CC, GPL / Asset Forfeiture / Enabling
Seems mostly aimed at what is discussed in the Fake Trade (http://www.channel4.com/video/the-fake-trade/index.html)
I think we can agree people manufacturing fake heart medicine is a bad thing; and that may have been the selling point.
However, "SEC. 511. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANTS." does the following:
"(a) Authorization- Section 2 of the Computer Crime Enforcement Act (42 U.S.C. 3713) is amended-- (1) in subsection (b), by inserting after `computer crime' each place it appears the following: `, including infringement of copyrighted works over the Internet';
I sure hope there aren't any congressmen who are violating the terms of CC or GPL. And can you imagine their outrage when their child downloads some songs and they have to forfeit that fancy new laptop? I mean, if enacted this will apply to congressmen, senators, even presidents, right?
Here are some links an asset forfeiture:
http://www.cjcj.org/pdf/civil_asset.pdf (PDF version)
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:57xthSv8mJoJ:www.cjcj.org/pdf/civil_asset.pdf+%22asset+forfeiture+law%22+%22supreme+court%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us (HTML version)
http://www.cato.org/testimony/ct-rp061197.html
http://law.gsu.edu/library/index/bibliographies/view?id=64
http://www.aclu.org/crimjustice/searchseizure/10303leg19990802.html
http://www.fear.org/hadaway.html
Also, aside from writing your congressperson and senator, stop supporting the RIAA/MPAA and the like. Stop enabling these people by refusing to watch, listen, pay or even discuss any of their products.
-
Re:U5?
I found a few references with my googlefu including this from Cyber Security: Developing a Canadian Strategy March 27, 2008 Ottawa:
Mr. Aisenberg [Esq. Chair US IT Sector Coordinating Council, EWA Information and Infrastructure Technologies Inc.] argued that such cooperation could be especially fruitful between the so called âoeU5 Countriesâ â" Canada, Great Britain, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand. As countries with a shared history, common language, and similar institutions and values, the U5 countries could work together and âoedevelop a doctrine that they can all believe in,â before moving policy, regulation, and legislation in that shared direction. In fact, Mr. Aisenberg emphasized that the democratic, liberal, free-market commitments common across the U5 countries are a logical starting point for cooperation, as they can anchor cooperation in common objectives and principles.
I'm still confused but am not going to try to figure it out. My cyber attack experice is limited to finding a Taco Bell network while war dialing 213 area code in 1990 or 1991. -
IOPS
People (read: vendors) now frequently refer to flash storage as superior when IOPs are the main issue.
From what I've been able to discern this is actually true only in read-mostly applications and applications where writes are already in neat multiples of the flash erase block size.
If you're doing random small writes your performance is likely to be miserable, because you'll need to erase blocks of flash much larger than the data actually being changed, then rewrite the block with the changed data.
Some apps, like databases, might not care about this if you're able to get their page size to match or exceed that of the underlying storage medium. Whether or not this is possible depends on the database.
For some other uses a log-oriented file system might help, but those have their own issues.
In general, though, flash storage currently only seems to be exciting for random read-mostly applications, which get a revolting performance boost so long as the blocks being written are small enough and scattered enough. For larger contiguous reads hard disks still leave flash in the dust because of their vastly superior raw throughput.
Vendors, however, make a much larger margin on flash disk sales.
This article (PDF) may be of interest:
Understanding Flash SSD performance
(google text version). -
Google Cache FTW
-
Looks like himI'm not sure of the credibility of this site but the picture there sure looks like him at a younger age, and the bio information says he lives in San Diego and is a member of the republican party. Additionally, if you use the Google cache page, it says that his real name is "Tony".
Regardless of whether it's him or not, people change. We've all done stupid things when we were young. I just hope that, if he's confronted about it, he doesn't try to lie. Hell, he can put it the same way Clinton did when people asked if he smoked marijuana. "I cracked software but didn't distribute it". That last part is a joke.
:-) -
Re:Website Slow...
I couldnt get to the Coral Cache link, but I could see their home page using this: http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:8-nCAPGr2SYJ:www.psystar.com/+psystar&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us&client=firefox-a
-
Mirror and Copy & Paste
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:xNSVXdrRQ_IJ:www.techforce.com.br/index.php/news/linux_blog/scientific_study_about_debian_governance_and_organization+http://www.techforce.com.br/index.php/news/linux_blog/scientific_study_about_debian_governance_and_organization&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=mozilla
"Scientific study about Debian Project governance and social organization
André Felipe Machado
Terça-Feira, 27 de Novembro de 2007
Two academic management researchers performed a detailed scientific study about Debian Project governance and social organization from the management perspective.
The study analyzed 13 years of Debian Project history, interviewed some Project participants and previous Leaders, and carefully observed patterns.
The open nature of history, registered at discussion lists archives and irc logs, meetings reports, helped a lot during the data collection phase.
The study is VERY interesting as scientific analyzed HOW an open source project survived, evolved and flourished during 13 years, overcoming many troubles only challenged by long term BIG communities, reaching a solid institutional foundations to resolve disputes.
The previously releasead version of the text can be found here.
The latest revised version, published at the Academy of Management Journal, Oct 2007, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p1079-1106, 28p; (AN 27169153), is copyrighted and can not be published here.
The authors are Siobhán O'Mahony , Assistant Professor at the University of California's Graduate School of Management, and Fabrizio Ferraro , General Management Professor at IESE..."
Bottom's PDF link in HTML: http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:R1NB3mNYlusJ:www.techforce.com.br/index.php/news/content/pdf/12895+http://www.techforce.com.br/index.php/news/content/pdf/12795&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=mozilla -
Mirror and Copy & Paste
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:xNSVXdrRQ_IJ:www.techforce.com.br/index.php/news/linux_blog/scientific_study_about_debian_governance_and_organization+http://www.techforce.com.br/index.php/news/linux_blog/scientific_study_about_debian_governance_and_organization&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=mozilla
"Scientific study about Debian Project governance and social organization
André Felipe Machado
Terça-Feira, 27 de Novembro de 2007
Two academic management researchers performed a detailed scientific study about Debian Project governance and social organization from the management perspective.
The study analyzed 13 years of Debian Project history, interviewed some Project participants and previous Leaders, and carefully observed patterns.
The open nature of history, registered at discussion lists archives and irc logs, meetings reports, helped a lot during the data collection phase.
The study is VERY interesting as scientific analyzed HOW an open source project survived, evolved and flourished during 13 years, overcoming many troubles only challenged by long term BIG communities, reaching a solid institutional foundations to resolve disputes.
The previously releasead version of the text can be found here.
The latest revised version, published at the Academy of Management Journal, Oct 2007, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p1079-1106, 28p; (AN 27169153), is copyrighted and can not be published here.
The authors are Siobhán O'Mahony , Assistant Professor at the University of California's Graduate School of Management, and Fabrizio Ferraro , General Management Professor at IESE..."
Bottom's PDF link in HTML: http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:R1NB3mNYlusJ:www.techforce.com.br/index.php/news/content/pdf/12895+http://www.techforce.com.br/index.php/news/content/pdf/12795&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=mozilla -
Re:All this due to lack of gravity
> In the meantime, couldn't a rotating space station be constructed so as that there is some simulated gravity environment on board?
There's a very interesting exploration of that very topic here (Google cache version):
-
Re:Just kill it already.
The dispute is over hardwood,
The dispute is about softwood. This can be confirmed in about two minutes on Google.
and NAFTA clearly shouldn't apply when you are destroying the environment to undercut your competitors.
Do you really think that the US was imposing duties for environmental reasons? Seriously?
Can't argue with you about the government's action re: the preservation of the spotted owl though. I'm not a big fan of North America's lack of respect for the environment as a whole. Then again, I could be doing a hell of a lot more personally. -
Am I missing something?
According to the link below, you first have to disable the protection on the computer by writing to the CSRs, which can only be done from ring 0. So already have to have root access to be able to do this. Or are they trying to do something else in that link?
Google Cache http://www.matasano.com/log/695/windows-remote-memory-access-though-firewire/ -
Re:Doesn't necessarily have to be big business/ go
There are also a number of "citizen groups" out there that want to shut down wikileaks because they think it is anti-democratic. It seems a lot of them are affiliated with the guys who "hunt" terrorists online. One such blog of note is the "Civilian Irregular Information Defense Group". See this blog post here. Though they seem to be from a psychological operations bent rather than hackers.
-
Re:Non free morals, the victim is also a criminal.The more reprehensible of non free software companies will deny a flaw exists when it's presented to them and beg the discoverer to keep quiet while they "fix" the problem
... forever and then act angry when the flaw is revealed to the public.You mean like Mozilla? I'm not sure if private security mailing lists, "confidential bugs" and all that are reprehensible, but they might be. Or do you mean another type of "reprehensible"?
Their existence may be repulsive
You mean like Mozilla, or do you mean another type of "repulsive"?
My patience for these parasites is exhausted.
Indeed.
-
Re:External Confirmation?
Check out Google Cache ?
The price has definitely been $31 according that cache; so the poster is not babbling out of his neck ... -
Re:Kill this article: referral
Not sure how long until the google cache refreshes, but if you check it out you do see the cache lists the price at $31. So one part of the story is corroborated, at least.
-
See the Google cache
The pricing error seems to be borne out by a cached Google page. http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:MFzDQFSwSUkJ:www.amazon.com/Jazz-Paris-Various-Artists/dp/B00005RSB2+Jazz+in+Paris+%5BBOX+SET%5D+%5BIMPORT%5D+%5BLIMITED+EDITION%5D&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us How they handle this error by honoring what they advertise or by using a clause somewhere in their legal text to disavow pricing errors remains to be seen.
-
Re:The Mexican Experience and "The Linux Enemy"
Sure, here's a Google HTML version.
-
Re:Slashdotted
Found some Google cache pages regarding this research:
3-D Depth Reconstruction from a Single Still Image
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:I34JFMW8eMQJ:ai.stanford.edu/~ang/papers/ijcv07-monocular3dreconstruction.pdf+site:stanford.edu+asaxena+reconstruction&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us
Learning Depth from Single Still Images: Approximate Inference
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:guijayWxDyUJ:ai.stanford.edu/~asaxena/papers/MS_E212_Ashu.pdf+site:stanford.edu+asaxena+reconstruction&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=9&gl=us
And an intro (full requires logging in): http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18825305.600 -
Re:Slashdotted
Found some Google cache pages regarding this research:
3-D Depth Reconstruction from a Single Still Image
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:I34JFMW8eMQJ:ai.stanford.edu/~ang/papers/ijcv07-monocular3dreconstruction.pdf+site:stanford.edu+asaxena+reconstruction&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us
Learning Depth from Single Still Images: Approximate Inference
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:guijayWxDyUJ:ai.stanford.edu/~asaxena/papers/MS_E212_Ashu.pdf+site:stanford.edu+asaxena+reconstruction&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=9&gl=us
And an intro (full requires logging in): http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg18825305.600 -
Re:4100 Lumen is certainly no world record holder.Yeah, that's it. I wanted to avoid slashdotting the servers there, so I didn't provide a link. Well the server is down already....
Google cache to the rescue! -
a lot harder than it soundsfrom one of the company's press releases:
I have spent the last 10 years working with Dr Gordon Dougal, medical doctor and scientist, exploring the effects of infra red light on living cells. We started off using cold sores (herpes simplex) as a clinical model to search for a therapeutic waveband of light within the infrared spectrum. After treating many hundreds of cold sores, and utilising basic scientific principles with the help of Durham University, we were successful in identifying 1072nm wavelength light to be therapeutic with properties antagonistic to harmful ultra-violet light.
Tried finding 1072nm near-IR emitters lately?
I just spent 10 minutes searching, the stuff I've seen tops out at about 880 nm. -
Time to recover the sources
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:_jvFfGt_BTsJ:www.penlug.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/DigitalTelevision+pchdtvr-1.0.tar.gz&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
Aaah, google cache, I love you...
especially the directions
"wget http://www.pchdtv.com/downloads/pcHDTV-1.6.tar.gz "
The file's still up, and the patch still under the GPL:
cat pcHDTV-1.6-cx88-0.0.4-patch | grep GPL
"GCAPTURE", "SCAPTURE", "SPLAYMODE", "SWRITEMODE", "GPLAYINFO",
+// distributed under the GPL licence. -
Democracy and Islam don't mix.
There are Muslims who disagree with you. There are moderate Muslims who support democracy. Radwan A. Masmoudi of the Center of the Study of Islam & Democracy (CSID) is one who supports democracy. Here's more on Islamic Democracy.
You also overlook Algeria as a democracy. As well as Egypt. And Turkey. Fact is is you left out a number of democratic Muslim nations.
Falcon -
Re:"AI"s tend to be overhyped
I read about an "AI" that would appear to learn in a game against a human, gradually becoming harder and harder to beat. The trick was that the AI was just a bunch of matchboxes. Oh, this is it (Google-cached pdf):
http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:nNcKxyHirgUJ:www.teachers.ash.org.au/kenprice/documents/martgame.doc+matchbox+artificial+intelligence+martin+gardner&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us&client=firefox-a -
The original article
Here's the cached article: Has E.T. Made A Call? [Google]
-
Cashed VersionI went and got the cashed version
Coitus Interruptus - ? http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Tn__1Wlm4yAJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-05.html+darwin+awards+2007+Coitus+Interruptus&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
The Enema Within - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:XstNYmjE6HEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-13.html+darwin+awards+2007+the+enema+within&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Beer for Bears - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:o6AOEFDNMKEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-08.html+darwin+awards+2007+beer+for+bears&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Stop. Look. Listen. - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WzxkuhMGeegJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-11.html+darwin+awards+2007+stop+look+listen&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Oil Tank Trampoline - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:K6PCQLDDR04J:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-06.html+darwin+awards+2007+oil+tank+trampoline&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Superior Momentum - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oAhg-uXJdmgJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-07.html+darwin+awards+2007+superior+momentum&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Barn Demolition - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oIp1EibmK-gJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-02.html+darwin+awards+2007+barn+demolition&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Electronic Fireworks -
Fatal a-Traction - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:T86gS6EexbMJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-16.html+darwin+award
-
Cashed VersionI went and got the cashed version
Coitus Interruptus - ? http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Tn__1Wlm4yAJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-05.html+darwin+awards+2007+Coitus+Interruptus&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
The Enema Within - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:XstNYmjE6HEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-13.html+darwin+awards+2007+the+enema+within&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Beer for Bears - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:o6AOEFDNMKEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-08.html+darwin+awards+2007+beer+for+bears&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Stop. Look. Listen. - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WzxkuhMGeegJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-11.html+darwin+awards+2007+stop+look+listen&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Oil Tank Trampoline - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:K6PCQLDDR04J:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-06.html+darwin+awards+2007+oil+tank+trampoline&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Superior Momentum - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oAhg-uXJdmgJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-07.html+darwin+awards+2007+superior+momentum&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Barn Demolition - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oIp1EibmK-gJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-02.html+darwin+awards+2007+barn+demolition&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Electronic Fireworks -
Fatal a-Traction - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:T86gS6EexbMJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-16.html+darwin+award
-
Cashed VersionI went and got the cashed version
Coitus Interruptus - ? http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Tn__1Wlm4yAJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-05.html+darwin+awards+2007+Coitus+Interruptus&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
The Enema Within - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:XstNYmjE6HEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-13.html+darwin+awards+2007+the+enema+within&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Beer for Bears - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:o6AOEFDNMKEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-08.html+darwin+awards+2007+beer+for+bears&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Stop. Look. Listen. - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WzxkuhMGeegJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-11.html+darwin+awards+2007+stop+look+listen&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Oil Tank Trampoline - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:K6PCQLDDR04J:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-06.html+darwin+awards+2007+oil+tank+trampoline&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Superior Momentum - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oAhg-uXJdmgJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-07.html+darwin+awards+2007+superior+momentum&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Barn Demolition - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oIp1EibmK-gJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-02.html+darwin+awards+2007+barn+demolition&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Electronic Fireworks -
Fatal a-Traction - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:T86gS6EexbMJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-16.html+darwin+award
-
Cashed VersionI went and got the cashed version
Coitus Interruptus - ? http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Tn__1Wlm4yAJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-05.html+darwin+awards+2007+Coitus+Interruptus&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
The Enema Within - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:XstNYmjE6HEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-13.html+darwin+awards+2007+the+enema+within&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Beer for Bears - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:o6AOEFDNMKEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-08.html+darwin+awards+2007+beer+for+bears&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Stop. Look. Listen. - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WzxkuhMGeegJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-11.html+darwin+awards+2007+stop+look+listen&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Oil Tank Trampoline - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:K6PCQLDDR04J:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-06.html+darwin+awards+2007+oil+tank+trampoline&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Superior Momentum - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oAhg-uXJdmgJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-07.html+darwin+awards+2007+superior+momentum&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Barn Demolition - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oIp1EibmK-gJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-02.html+darwin+awards+2007+barn+demolition&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Electronic Fireworks -
Fatal a-Traction - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:T86gS6EexbMJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-16.html+darwin+award
-
Cashed VersionI went and got the cashed version
Coitus Interruptus - ? http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Tn__1Wlm4yAJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-05.html+darwin+awards+2007+Coitus+Interruptus&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
The Enema Within - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:XstNYmjE6HEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-13.html+darwin+awards+2007+the+enema+within&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Beer for Bears - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:o6AOEFDNMKEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-08.html+darwin+awards+2007+beer+for+bears&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Stop. Look. Listen. - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WzxkuhMGeegJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-11.html+darwin+awards+2007+stop+look+listen&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Oil Tank Trampoline - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:K6PCQLDDR04J:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-06.html+darwin+awards+2007+oil+tank+trampoline&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Superior Momentum - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oAhg-uXJdmgJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-07.html+darwin+awards+2007+superior+momentum&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Barn Demolition - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oIp1EibmK-gJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-02.html+darwin+awards+2007+barn+demolition&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Electronic Fireworks -
Fatal a-Traction - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:T86gS6EexbMJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-16.html+darwin+award
-
Cashed VersionI went and got the cashed version
Coitus Interruptus - ? http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Tn__1Wlm4yAJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-05.html+darwin+awards+2007+Coitus+Interruptus&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
The Enema Within - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:XstNYmjE6HEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-13.html+darwin+awards+2007+the+enema+within&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Beer for Bears - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:o6AOEFDNMKEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-08.html+darwin+awards+2007+beer+for+bears&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Stop. Look. Listen. - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WzxkuhMGeegJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-11.html+darwin+awards+2007+stop+look+listen&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Oil Tank Trampoline - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:K6PCQLDDR04J:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-06.html+darwin+awards+2007+oil+tank+trampoline&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Superior Momentum - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oAhg-uXJdmgJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-07.html+darwin+awards+2007+superior+momentum&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Barn Demolition - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oIp1EibmK-gJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-02.html+darwin+awards+2007+barn+demolition&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Electronic Fireworks -
Fatal a-Traction - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:T86gS6EexbMJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-16.html+darwin+award
-
Cashed VersionI went and got the cashed version
Coitus Interruptus - ? http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Tn__1Wlm4yAJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-05.html+darwin+awards+2007+Coitus+Interruptus&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
The Enema Within - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:XstNYmjE6HEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-13.html+darwin+awards+2007+the+enema+within&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Beer for Bears - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:o6AOEFDNMKEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-08.html+darwin+awards+2007+beer+for+bears&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Stop. Look. Listen. - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WzxkuhMGeegJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-11.html+darwin+awards+2007+stop+look+listen&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Oil Tank Trampoline - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:K6PCQLDDR04J:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-06.html+darwin+awards+2007+oil+tank+trampoline&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Superior Momentum - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oAhg-uXJdmgJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-07.html+darwin+awards+2007+superior+momentum&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Barn Demolition - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oIp1EibmK-gJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-02.html+darwin+awards+2007+barn+demolition&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Electronic Fireworks -
Fatal a-Traction - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:T86gS6EexbMJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-16.html+darwin+award
-
Cashed VersionI went and got the cashed version
Coitus Interruptus - ? http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:Tn__1Wlm4yAJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-05.html+darwin+awards+2007+Coitus+Interruptus&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
The Enema Within - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:XstNYmjE6HEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-13.html+darwin+awards+2007+the+enema+within&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Beer for Bears - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:o6AOEFDNMKEJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-08.html+darwin+awards+2007+beer+for+bears&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Stop. Look. Listen. - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:WzxkuhMGeegJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-11.html+darwin+awards+2007+stop+look+listen&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Oil Tank Trampoline - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:K6PCQLDDR04J:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-06.html+darwin+awards+2007+oil+tank+trampoline&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Superior Momentum - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oAhg-uXJdmgJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-07.html+darwin+awards+2007+superior+momentum&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Barn Demolition - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:oIp1EibmK-gJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-02.html+darwin+awards+2007+barn+demolition&hl=en&gl=us&strip=1/
Electronic Fireworks -
Fatal a-Traction - http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:T86gS6EexbMJ:www.darwinawards.com/darwin/darwin2007-16.html+darwin+award