Slashdot Mirror

Let me guess, you'd kick my ass, but can't read the road signs to get to my house?

For those that didn't get the reference.

That's the one (406373

Barnes and Noble usually have large bookstores, with entirely different sections if not rooms, for Fiction, Non-Fiction, Political, and Religion books. Depending upon the layout, it might be possible for two sections to be adjacent, although I have never seen any Bibles being placed anywhere else except the main
From the exact wording, the writer certainly sounds like a joker messing around with someone else's property.

No, the fundamental problem isn't solved. The fundamental problem is the same people who forward urban legends around the net.

Unfortunately, we still can't figure out how to stab people in the face over the internet

What possible bearing on the rating could that line have on the rating? Is "puff" a swear word or something?

America's religious right are very touchy about Creationism vs. Evolutionism.

Having God disappear in a puff of logic is just rubbing salt in the wound.

There's a IRC chat in bash.org, where a guy got fired for accidently putting Bibles in the fiction section.

After all it only takes three steps to install Gentoo...

I've been an avid fan of Gentoo for quite a while now, so I'm not entirely sure how I feel about this article or the postings so far.

I guess I've always had a sense of pride of being able to compile the OS during the installation, but yes it's true, it's a pain in the arse to get a 'quick' installation going. Hopefully a graphical installation won't "taint" the perception that the speed and efficiency of an OS compiled for your own hardware isn't worth the time it takes.

I currently run gentoo 2005.0 on my Toshiba laptop and love it, and will be changing my primary linux fileserver/workstation to gentoo in the next little while.

Here's one of my favorite bash.org quotes about gentoo. Got a good chuckle out of it...

Had it not been AC, I would expect some credit where due.

Yes, there is: We're not talking about an innocent n00b---we're talking about a malicious yet fundamentally clueless asshole who was attempting to vandalize someone else's machine. bitchcheck acted like he was some sort of 1337 HaX0r God yet demonstrated an astonishing degree of incompetence. He tried to commit a crime and it backfired. That's funny for all the right reasons.

Oh, and giving a bunch of n00bs a keen flash of insight about Alt-F4 and getting a good laugh while costing them nothing more than the few seconds it takes to reconnect is a harmless prank. Harmless. And if there's this one guy who keeps reconnecting and Alt-F4'ing back out, so much the better.

Check this out from bash.org.

Yes, there is: We're not talking about an innocent n00b---we're talking about a malicious yet fundamentally clueless asshole who was attempting to vandalize someone else's machine. bitchcheck acted like he was some sort of 1337 HaX0r God yet demonstrated an astonishing degree of incompetence. He tried to commit a crime and it backfired. That's funny for all the right reasons.

Oh, and giving a bunch of n00bs a keen flash of insight about Alt-F4 and getting a good laugh while costing them nothing more than the few seconds it takes to reconnect is a harmless prank. Harmless. And if there's this one guy who keeps reconnecting and Alt-F4'ing back out, so much the better.

Check this out from bash.org.

Search bash.org for hunter2.

Sounds like this.

http://bash.org/?119969
http://bash.org/?83489
http://bash.org/?38640
http://bash.org/?7658
http://bash.org/?7229
http://bash.org/?11701

http://bash.org/?119969
http://bash.org/?83489
http://bash.org/?38640
http://bash.org/?7658
http://bash.org/?7229
http://bash.org/?11701

http://bash.org/?119969
http://bash.org/?83489
http://bash.org/?38640
http://bash.org/?7658
http://bash.org/?7229
http://bash.org/?11701

http://bash.org/?119969
http://bash.org/?83489
http://bash.org/?38640
http://bash.org/?7658
http://bash.org/?7229
http://bash.org/?11701

http://bash.org/?119969
http://bash.org/?83489
http://bash.org/?38640
http://bash.org/?7658
http://bash.org/?7229
http://bash.org/?11701

http://bash.org/?119969
http://bash.org/?83489
http://bash.org/?38640
http://bash.org/?7658
http://bash.org/?7229
http://bash.org/?11701

There are so many of these on bash. Still funny that people still do it.

...of "CmdrTaco", a Slashdot admin who took a rejected bash.org submission and posted it to the front page of his website.

quotes
More quotes

Or maybe the author just saw this one. Enough bash links for you, editors ? :)

Or maybe the author just saw this one. Enough bash links for you, editors ? :)

Or maybe the author just saw this one. Enough bash links for you, editors ? :)

Or maybe the author just saw this one. Enough bash links for you, editors ? :)

Refer to a classic

http://www.bash.org/?6824http://www.bash.org/?6824

apperently something went wrong with that post...

Let's attribute this quote properly, shall we? Original quote here

Here's the original. It's a classic :D. Check out the top 100 too, if you haven't already.

Me: That stash of magazines under my bed... It's not what it looks like!

Dad: Well, I hope not. Because it looks like you're masturbating to a 35-year old copy of Electronics magazine!

(Credit due to bash.org.)

http://www.bash.org/?100796

where the men are men
the women are men
and everyone under 18, has a .gov ident!

ducktape is merely a physical manifestation of regexps

http://www.bash.org/?11397

This seemed relevant, somehow.

wizard hat

if these two cases are related ;-)
http://www.bash.org/?163052

Be aware that there is prior art.

built-djbdns? Oh, that's right - it's not Free Software so Debian can't package it.

Something about configuring DNS. Maybe to run as "nobody", I presume. I guess we're setting up a cache directory in /etc? Something or another about localhost.

/var/what?

I'm not trying to slag on you, but those aren't exactly the most transparent instructions I've seen.

<3 Linux

I'm surprised nobody linked to the #2 post on bash.org. The similarities are surprising.

This seems oddly relevant.

I think this recent bash.org Quote sums Real up best.

This doesn't mean it will be easy to find this device once they notice the traffic.

You shouldn't forget the bash.org No. 1 quote

that sounds familiar...

At least cite bash.org if you're going to use one of the jokes from their site.

No issues with HD. And don't worry, here is the quick howto, it's pretty straight forward.

Eh, it's pretty bad
http://bash.org/?quote=69

this seems strangly appropriate.

Way to steal the joke from bash.org, you fucking douche.

When you're quoting bash.org it's general netiquette to provide your source. Don't worry, I'll do it for you. Here's the link

Shades of http://bash.org/?142934? :)