Domain: engadget.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to engadget.com.
Comments · 3,876
-
Mobile Internet Devices MIDs
I know this doesn't quite fit the request but MIDs are probably a good solution. Packing full Windows or Linux you can run Putty or SSH as you would from your desktop. Most MIDs are not phones Willcom in Japan has a MID phone so it won't be so long until the US has something similar. Then again, if you have a MID with good wireless coverage why would you need a phone?
-
Re:From Engadget...http://www.engadget.com/2008/05/22/318-wifi-network-bridge-connects-two-locations-up-to-5-miles-ap/ Current model requires LINE-OF-SIGHT
they hope to address this issue by end of summer -
$318 WiFi network bridge connects two locations upSee if this works for you:
There is an article at engadget about this sort of thing. It requires line-of-site, but I'm sure you could manage that.If you've tried every antenna and extender on the market today with subpar results, HD Communications is apt to become your new best friend. The outfit has just revealed its HD26200, a "complete outdoor wireless network bridge in the 802.11b/g unlicensed 2.4GHz band that sells for only $318." Said device bridges wireless internet between two locales up to 5 miles apart without requiring a single RF cable, being that both Ubiquiti network radios are powered over Ethernet. If you're looking for the catch, the bridge does require a direct line of sight between the two locations, but the firm is reportedly looking to expand its non-line of sight family by the summer's end.
Link to the Article
Hope this helps. -
From Engadget...
-
Re:Welp, it's already slashdotted!
Not quite a mirror, but you can read about it on Engadget
-
here's a photo
-
Re:One very workable solution...
Damn dude, don't give anyone any ideas.
-
Re:You get...
Yeah, let's not forget screens (a friend has dozens of these, which thusly account for thousands of dead pixels), batteries or any of the other components, really.
Hardware failures are common and it wouldn't be a real problem if (1) Apple's harware wasn't so homogeneous, so that when a few users have a problem, others will probably follow and (2) Apple didn't send blindfolds (glossy, shiny, but still blindfolds) to anyone who complained, claiming the warranty is of one year only when my country's laws clearly state that it lasts 2 years if the product was sold here, regardless of who made it and where.
On a sidenote, they're so picky chosing the right RAM byte by byte that I've been waiting for a replacement for a stick for 2 months. It's not my computer and it's not regularly used, but still... -
The trust factor of MS has to be considered.
Search engines are not THAT tough to build. Technologically, it's within their grasp. But people just don't WANT to do business with MS. Without a captive market, customers and would-be partners take their business elsewhere.
And if Microsoft wants Yahoo! because of the eyeballs that will be a problem for them. It's easy for people to switch to another search engine or email provider. I've heard a few people say that if MS does acquire Yahoo! they'll switch, though I use mostly Google for searching I use Yahoo! for email and for the groups and I will switch.
Their most successful/innovative product is XBox, and they lose money on every single one that ships. The joke of it is, by the time they reach the break even point it will be time to upgrade the hardware and start losing money again.
MS has reached the break even point on the XBox, for the second quarter they've made profits, $89 million this last quarter.
On the desktop, I predict Apple will do the best job capitalizing on the Vista meltdown. Linux will rule the cheapie subnotebooks and everything below that in the food chain, along with the server world. MSFT will be stuck in the middle, sandwiched between Linux on the low end and Apple on the high end.
Falcon -
Because video games help with this.
-
These are not bad icons.The "talk bubble" icon for chat is pretty standard online, and pretty easy to understand. Calling RSS feeds "news" is also pretty standard... these kinds of programs started out being called "news readers", which made things really tough for people looking for GUI Usenet "news readers".
But talking about bad user interface design...
There is no consistency in controls between activities. Every activity does things its own way, based apparently upon the individual programmer's preference.
Sounds like Vista to me. The older Windows GUI design was one of its great strengths, but starting as far back as Windows '98 Microsoft has consistently been undercutting their own biggest technical advantage by adding new, poorly thought out, and inconsistent user interface details. I put my foot down with Windows XP. I use Windows 2000 at home, and at work I've disabled as much of the XP "enhancements" as I can.
I would say the same thing if Apple coughed up a version of Mac OS X for it.
They did. Negroponte refused it:We all know how much Jobs likes the education market, so according to the Wall Street Journal he did a very magnanimous thing and offered OS X up to Nicholas Negroponte for his $100 laptop for developing nations. But not even bothering to discount the vast technical difficulties with getting OS X to run on this kind of machine, Negroponte and his team apparently canned the whole idea because OS X is a closed-source OS, and they believed it fundamental to their system to use only totally open, completely modifiable software. Yep, this all sounds about right to us. Jobs gets positive PR, Negroponte & Co. get to up their cred; win-win all around! -- Endgadget
How do you feel about Windows on OLPC now? -
Re:How unfair...
"Pistorius' lawyers countered with independent tests conducted by a team led by MIT professor Hugh M. Herr that claimed to show he doesn't gain any advantage over able-bodied runners."
I recalled reading an article about this earlier and after some searching I found it again:
And yes, it's about the same runner.
From this article:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/17/prosthetic-limbed-runner-disqualified-from-olympics/
"According to the IAAF report, the "mechanical advantage of the blade in relation to the healthy ankle joint of an able bodied athlete is higher than 30-percent." Additionally, Pistorius uses 25-percent less energy than average runners due to the artificial limbs, therefore giving him an unfair advantage on the track... or so they say"
Now I am wondering about why the MIT is saying that there's no difference. No difference vs 25-30% difference is ehm, a huge difference... -
Re:Loose translation:Let me see if I can give you a couple of clu^H^H^Hanswers....
1) MS is not offering their software from the beneficence of samaritan spirit. They are offering it at that price to ensure that even the 5th world will be hooked on their constant upgrade and pay to play cycles. $3/CD is better than zero, and it will lead to sales later on. In the marketing world it's called a loss leader... http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/lossleader.asp
2) More functionality in this case includes wasted battery usage through OS issues, BSODs, virus prone applications, upgrade cycles that are longer than the XO will be a viable product (read no upgrades)
3) No matter what language it supports, XP still has the same problems, so this is not much of a bonus, here is some data to see what the real language support is:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Linux_language_support
http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/handson/dev/winxpintl.mspx
Now, when it comes down to it, neither is likely to support a dialect that is spoken by only several thousand people in the world, but both support a large number of languages making this an odd point to harp on. I've given you a couple of links, perhaps you can point out to the rest of us what huge advantage XP offers over Linux in general and the XO's original system in particular.
3) Redhat, Novell, Canonical et al were not asked to step up. OLPC chose their operating system and MS 'convinced' them to re-choose. I say convinced with all the irony that I can muster in this life and the next. MS is offering a raped version of XP, and not the version you are obviously used to.
Sugar OS was just right for the OLPC and with a few tweaks would have been very nice for the goals of that project.
As for your general attitude in your comment, I offer this review as rebuttal. It's from http://www.engadget.com/tag/olpc and the emphasis below is mine. It's been a controversial decision, but it looks like the OLPC XO has completed its transition from revolutionary education project to just another tiny Windows laptop with a useless keyboard -- albeit one with a pleasantly whimsical design. Yep, it's official: Microsoft and OLPC just put out a joint press release saying that XP-loaded XOs will be available starting in August or September, with some countries to get the machines as soon as next month. Users will get all the regular functionality of XP -- it's basically the same build as on the Eee and other ultraportables -- but Microsoft's spent over a year developing specialized drivers for the XO's various features like e-book mode, the writing pad, and camera. (We're pretty certain that doesn't include mesh networking, but WiFi is supported.) XP is too big for the built-in 1GB flash chip, so it'll come preloaded on a 2GB SD card, leaving just about 1.5GB free total for apps and media. It seems like Microsoft is thrilled about this partnership, but it's a not going to make NickNeg's search for new vision at the top any easier. As for Sugar? You'll still be able to get it, but we have a sinking feeling about its future. Demo video after the break. I realize that you seem to have been throwing down the gauntlet for the Linux fanbois, but you would be wise to remember to bring more than a knife to a gun fight. -
Re:Begs the question
At least they can be reused as excellent chess computers. I'd say it will take a long time until such flaws are history. Personally I wouldn't support any closed-source solution and even OSS should be tested for an extensive period of time before I'd trust it. Till then I'll stick to voting by mail in case online voting becomes mandatory (which is possible and easy in the country I live in).
Might sound like a contradiction, but online votes might be even safer in the long run. It's not like paper votes are more secure per se - we just have more experience with it. A centralized system which encrypts everything up to one institution on top might be easier to control than all those humans reporting from polling places. But the current systems work differently and as I said I have doubts that there'll be an electronic system I'd trust. -
Re:Digital picture frame?
-
Re:Give it to them for free
No Sarbanes Oxley only applies to Apple
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/21/the-20-ipod-touch-upgrade-really-for-legal-reasons-or-not/ -
Re:DVR? Seriously?
Ideally I would like to use uTorrent, but since there is no Linux version, you can either use wine to run uTorrent, or use Azureus with its RSS import plugin. There is a promising new client and server application that essentially does what we are looking for http://swarmtv.nl/ but it's still in alpha. There is a good engadget article that shows you how to set Azureus up to download these torrents http://www.engadget.com/2004/11/23/how-to-broadcatching-using-rss-bittorrent-to-automatically/ After that you just need the cron job and maybe a shell script to serve up your completed mp4 files to uShare.
-
X-Handed Mouse
Is it me, or does the mouse look like it's designed to be used with a specific hand? Whether it's right or left I don't know...but example..
I indulged myself and picked up a Razer Lachesis mouse not long ago and it's pretty much symmetrical. I'm a right-y, so I don't *need* to pay particular attention to these things but do they produce two versions, one for right-handed people and one for left? Or what? -
But it's Verizon...
-
Re:Impact on OS market- 'Netbook'?
That's a long time for MS to wait. If the Asus prediction is anywhere near correct, there'll be a whole lot of people learning that Linux isn't just some command line based geek OS.
-
Re:That's why Open-Source fails on the desktop
When did I say that Apple makes touchscreen notebooks? "Multitouch" simply means that a touch-based input system (in the case of Apple notebooks the trackpad) has suport for you using more than one finger/stylus/whatever to make inputs. My Santa Rosa MacBook Pro uses the trackpad as a two-dimensional scroll wheel when I use two fingers - that would be the rudimentary approximation. The MacBook Air (and, as far as I know, newer MBPs) allows stuff like resizing windows by performing a pinching motion on the trackpad.
Before you tell me that "true multitouch requires a touchscreen": I'm certainly not the only one who considers this to be multitouch. -
Real Life Aliens PowerLoader
It doesn't have hands yet, but it works. You even step into the boots with your feet in the same way Ripley did in Aliens.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/11/25/sarcos-military-exoskeleton-becomes-a-frightening-reality/ -
Re:Psystar- cheap, but is it a deal?A base system with the Leopard 10.5 OS, 2GB of RAM, a 250GB HDD and Core2Duo processor costs $555 plus shipping. It does not come with a monitor or keyboard. Since TFA reveals that the motherboard is a Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L (and the black case is obviously an Asus TM-210), I think we can further evaluate its "value" by "building" a nearly identical system on Newegg. Here's what I got:
- ASUS TM-210 Black 0.6mm SECC MicroATX Mini Tower Computer Case 300W Power Supply $54.99
- GIGABYTE GA-G31M-S2L LGA 775 Intel G31 Micro ATX Intel Motherboard $66.99
- Intel Core 2 Duo E4600 Allendale 2.4GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor Model BX80557E4600 - Retail $119.99
- SUPER TALENT 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model T800UX2GC5 $37.99
- Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 ST3250310AS 250GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive - OEM $59.99
- LG 20X DVD Burner Black SATA Model GH20NS10 - OEM $24.99
- APPLE Mac OS X v10.5.1 Leopard - Retail $109.99
- TOTAL: $474.93 (plus shipping)
-
Re:Psystar- cheap, but is it a deal?Look at the specs though, you cant compare the two. and the options to select it bump it up to the same price as the only slightly slower Apple Mini. Slightly slower? Did you read TFA? The MacBook (which is comparable to the Mac mini) got pwned by the cheap Psystar. no it didn't. The cpu performance was comparable. THe disk perfromance was not bad. Yes, the video card performance lagged but by less than a factor of 2. who cares? what niche buys the cheapest piece of crap so loud you can't stand to be in the same room with then cares about graphics speed within a factor of 2?
if you want faster disk or a dvd burner s on a mac mini you can put one in with a screwdriver or even smarter add a firewire drive.
besides which this argument is about TCO not chest beating performance or spec for spec. it's about what's the entry level price for a mac.
If you want chest beating then the pystar is not what you want anyhow. if you want to talk TCO, then those slower disk and slower graphics cards save you about $160 a year in power bills if you leave this thing on 24/7. the mac mini draws laptop size sips of power and has power management to boot. this thing runs at full bore. -
Re:Psystar- cheap, but is it a deal?Look at the specs though, you cant compare the two. and the options to select it bump it up to the same price as the only slightly slower Apple Mini. Slightly slower? Did you read TFA? The MacBook (which is comparable to the Mac mini) got pwned by the cheap Psystar. This shouldn't be surprising, since the MacBook (and the Mac mini) has a slower notebook hard drive, a slower CPU (with slower frontside bus), and the slower notebook version of Intel's integrated graphics (lower GPU clock speed and less allocated memory). Where the clone is faster and has more memory, it lacks firewire, wireless (while you could get away with no wireless unless your using it for a media PC, firewire I find essential no matter what until Apple adds external SATA), The $600 Mac mini only has a DVD/CD-RW combo drive and 80GB hard drive, while the entry-level Open Computer comes with a DVD writer and 250GB hard drive. You need to spend $800 on the Mac mini to get a DVD writer and a whopping 120GB hard drive.
Of course, I'm not saying the Psystar "hackintosh" is a better value than the Mac mini. In fact, I think the Psystar is a piece of crap when it's running OS X (no fan speed control and not update-able). It's kind of ridiculous to compare the two, but I guess we're "forced" to since Apple doesn't offer a headless desktop Mac with desktop (not notebook) parts. At least the Mac mini works like it's supposed to.
-
Re:Psystar- cheap, but is it a deal?The Psystar systems can take a real video card the mini can't also the open pro has a bigger case and likely less fan noise. The previous psystar video had horrible fain noise. The Psystar in that video with the horrible fan noise was not the OpenPro, which uses the famously quiet Antec P182 case. That video, and the current article, featured the cheaper Open Computer, which uses the much cheaper Asus TM-211 case.
However, the current article says the loud fan problem seems to be caused by incompatibilies between the motherboard/case fan controller and OS X (and maybe the hacked EFI). If the same motherboard/case was used with Windows, it would surely be much quieter.
-
Re:"Making money through doing evil"?
Um, Sure, openBSD is secure, until you install anything other than the limited subset it comes with. and even without that, they have a couple of security fixes a month from what I remember when on the mailing list. As for OS-X, I don't see how having a huge hole in safari can be classed as "secure". Note that in that competition, it took allowing the install of random third party software before the windows box was compromised. The apple one was compromised by just going to a website.
So, please, hate on Microsoft all you want, just try do it with actual facts. -
Re:A slump?
If you're going to insult a culture do it intelligently... That being said, yes there are many fakes all over the world.
Personally I like Creative players more than iPods (I traded my 30 Gig IPod Video for my sister's creative Zen Touch, better sound quality).
An mp3 player is a very cheap general processor or audio processor some simple UI software and a flash disk, they are increadibly over priced and their ergonomics and ui are a matter of preference, people aren't that different and if iPod's appeal to 70% of north American's then yes it's likely that they'll appeal to a similar percentage in other cultures, but it's not necessarily so.
Personally I think the iPod succeeded in North America because of poor competition, in Korea Samsung doesn't have much competition.
Koreans have a slightly lower average income . However, lower costs of: living, social services and prices mean that the average Korean can buy more products, and Samsung's $4-600 mp3 players are wildly successful there.
Korean commercialism is something of an oddity, my Korean ex. was adamant that regardless of income level Koreans prefer KIA vehicles, which north americans consider unacceptable. -
Very interesting.
Not bad, but a little expensive. According to this, the battery lasts a week and has it's own wall wart. I suppose you could charge it up at night, like you do your cell phone and the limited display area is responsible for that good battery life.
Do you get a lot of use out of it without a matching earbud? My first thought was, "If I get a call I actually want to deal with, I'm going to have to pull the phone out anyway." An earbud would take care of that problem but that adds even more to the $400 cost of the watch. Was the $400 worth it to begin with?
Can you make it work with a Neo1973? The device is capable of much more than Sony gave it. It could do everything the Spot does and more if it would really talk to a smart phone. The Neo1973 also takes care of privacy issues - I'd never put my contact information into a non free phone hooked up to companies that are asking for immunity to wiretapping crimes.
-
Re:Having purchased a few Seagate products...
In case you wondered what drives Google are using: http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/18/massive-google-hard-drive-survey-turns-up-very-interesting-thing/
-
Civilization in a suitcase
I must confess I wonder what would happen if an accident happened to the various chip fabs, how far that would set us back technologically. I hope that they aren't all in East Asia.
Perhaps what is necessary is a book containing the bare minimum to enable us to recover digital information. I suspect that flash would have remarkable longevity if you only write once, and store it in an enclosed nitrogen atmosphere with a dessicant sachet. Sandisk looks to be bringing out some sort of 100 year archival quality flash. It's not 1000 years, but it's a step closer.
If we had a collection of books detailing exactly how to go from stone-age to creating keyboards, monitors, computers (even a primitive computer), and then everything else is stored on flash, I suspect that could be useful. An alternative might be storing a few LCD screens, a few keyboards, a few completely solid state computers and a few solar panels in your basement for just such an occasion, and put ALL the info onto digital. That way if TSHTF you just put up your solar panels. Maybe you'd need a book detailing how to make a generator for when the solar panels eventually fail, which you could then hook up to a water mill.
A major concern with printed word is density. Libraries are large and vulnerable. It's rare to discover a forgotten library as such. It's much more common to uncover a scroll or book. I'd suggest that my "civilization in a suitcase" would be much more useful, fairly inexpensive and likely to survive barbarians if there was enough redundancy. I think the cost would not be much more than an order of magnitude though. An Eee PC, an airtight bottle, a few 16Gb flash disk, some dessicant, a generator construction manual, some solar panels... probably not more than $600. You'd probably have to resolder solid-state caps on the board though.
http://www.engadget.com/2007/02/27/sandisk-secretly-concocting-read-only-memory-for-archival-use/ -
Re:Is this really necessary?
Are you suggesting that Fujitsu took the very simple AES encryption process and is for some reason storing extra data alongside it on the platter? I don't think my assumption was naive, I think you are either absurdly paranoid or trying for a straw man argument.
For a complete audit, yes, you would want to take the drive physically apart and make sure that it didn't store something stupid in eeprom or a cache as well as the platters, but you would also need to do the same for the keyboard, keyboard controller, motherboard, RAM, CPU, etc.
Handling of keys is always problematic, but hardware based systems potentially pass the key through much less hardware than software based systems. It is nearly inconceivable to create a software system where the key isn't at least stored in main memory and the CPU.
I guess you are right in a way, we won't have full security in Fujitsu's security until we break down their hardware and get the complete details for all the chips and the way that every part is manufactured...
Of course we won't get software encryption security until we break down our WHOLE COMPUTER and get the same data for every chip from every company. I'm sure glad you are sure every last component of your computer is fully secured. -
Re:Pixels Are Your Friend
Meant to say (in the first para, but repeated the rest anyway...):
"That would NOT be a problem if Flybook were prevalent at an affordable unit cost and consumer price (instead of US$2900), AND if it could rotate 90 degrees...:"
http://www.flybookus.com/flybook_vm.php
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/12/dialogues-flybook-vm-laptop/
http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/flybook-vm-laptop-with-airline-friendly-telescoping-screen/
Oh and check this one out:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/clio-nxt-unleashed-on-duke-university-kind-of/
Doesn't resolve the issue for developers, but... -
Re:Pixels Are Your Friend
Meant to say (in the first para, but repeated the rest anyway...):
"That would NOT be a problem if Flybook were prevalent at an affordable unit cost and consumer price (instead of US$2900), AND if it could rotate 90 degrees...:"
http://www.flybookus.com/flybook_vm.php
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/12/dialogues-flybook-vm-laptop/
http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/flybook-vm-laptop-with-airline-friendly-telescoping-screen/
Oh and check this one out:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/clio-nxt-unleashed-on-duke-university-kind-of/
Doesn't resolve the issue for developers, but... -
Re:Pixels Are Your Friend
Meant to say (in the first para, but repeated the rest anyway...):
"That would NOT be a problem if Flybook were prevalent at an affordable unit cost and consumer price (instead of US$2900), AND if it could rotate 90 degrees...:"
http://www.flybookus.com/flybook_vm.php
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/12/dialogues-flybook-vm-laptop/
http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/flybook-vm-laptop-with-airline-friendly-telescoping-screen/
Oh and check this one out:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/clio-nxt-unleashed-on-duke-university-kind-of/
Doesn't resolve the issue for developers, but... -
Re:Pixels Are Your Friend
That would NOT be a problem if Flybook were prevalent at an affordable unit cost and consumer price (instead of US$2900):
http://www.flybookus.com/flybook_vm.php
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/12/dialogues-flybook-vm-laptop/
http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/flybook-vm-laptop-with-airline-friendly-telescoping-screen/
Oh and check this one out:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/clio-nxt-unleashed-on-duke-university-kind-of/
Doesn't resolve the issue for developers, but... -
Re:Pixels Are Your Friend
That would NOT be a problem if Flybook were prevalent at an affordable unit cost and consumer price (instead of US$2900):
http://www.flybookus.com/flybook_vm.php
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/12/dialogues-flybook-vm-laptop/
http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/flybook-vm-laptop-with-airline-friendly-telescoping-screen/
Oh and check this one out:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/clio-nxt-unleashed-on-duke-university-kind-of/
Doesn't resolve the issue for developers, but... -
Re:Pixels Are Your Friend
That would NOT be a problem if Flybook were prevalent at an affordable unit cost and consumer price (instead of US$2900):
http://www.flybookus.com/flybook_vm.php
http://www.engadget.com/2007/01/12/dialogues-flybook-vm-laptop/
http://www.engadget.com/2006/06/08/flybook-vm-laptop-with-airline-friendly-telescoping-screen/
Oh and check this one out:
http://www.engadget.com/2006/04/14/clio-nxt-unleashed-on-duke-university-kind-of/
Doesn't resolve the issue for developers, but... -
Re:what really happened here?
what's the fun in that? And everyone knows that Microsoft's ability to warm things up and catch things of fire or blow them up is legendary.
http://www.waxingamerica.com/2008/01/atts-u-verse-in.html
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/16/atandt-u-verse-batteries-going-supernova/
http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/triple-play/att-uverse-batteries-exploding.asp
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/11/23/xbox_blaze/
and others including this latest. And what fun is it to post in a computer tech rag about a toaster burning down a home? When Microsoft does it, there's something about it which makes you wonder why they are in the tech industry at all. They are not very good at security, lose money on everything but monopoly leveraged products and their hardware and software does a nice job at adding to global warming( whatever that is ). IMO.
LoB -
Re:Terminology
You mean like this?
Fondle, smack, close enough, right? -
Skype's savior
My prediction is that Skype will not only become more popular but also more profitable. Their savior will come in the form of the new mobile computing platform. UMPC or MID + 3G/3.5G/4G/WiMAX + Skype.
Once battery life increases (atom) and mobile networks improve, techies will quickly adopt this platform as their primary phones but they'll still need to make and receive calls to others with PSTN phones.
-
Skype's savior
My prediction is that Skype will not only become more popular but also more profitable. Their savior will come in the form of the new mobile computing platform. UMPC or MID + 3G/3.5G/4G/WiMAX + Skype.
Once battery life increases (atom) and mobile networks improve, techies will quickly adopt this platform as their primary phones but they'll still need to make and receive calls to others with PSTN phones.
-
Re:Global Warming!
It seems that the PS3 40 GB consumes only half of what you said (135 Watts, see http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/30/40gb-ps3-features-65nm-chips-lower-power-consumption/).
So you can go and buy a second PS3. -
Re:Multi TouchI was under the impression that this was "invented" (yes MultiTouch has been around for a long time according to the WikiFingerworks. In 1998, Fingerworks, a Newark-based company run by University of Delaware academics John Elias and Wayne Westerman, produced a line of multi-touch products including the iGesture Pad. Then Apple bought Fingerworks (according to many rumors) and got all their IP and technology. I haven't run across any info on ASUS having this technology first. Unless they're the ones that bought Fingerworks and then licensed the technology to Apple.
-
Re:Die, TiVo
Sorry, I was thinking of the "Tivo Series 3". Apparently they have removed their heads from their asses since then and decided to offer a unit that costs less than a small car.
What's the trade-off though? What did they leave off of the "Tivo HD" that was in the "Series 3"?
I may have to reconsider them if this "CableCard" thing actually works and isn't just another chance for Comcast to screw you.
I bet most TiVo users have only one tuner though, and just have their analog cable plugged right into it. Seriously, I bet at least 75% of them. -
Creepy AOL+Yahoo merger image
This news image over on engadget has got to be one of the creepiest things I've seen in a while.
-
Re:I don't like the direction they're taking
My only complaint is that I wish the speakers were moved and the screen enlarged into the spot they are now.
I guess you should have waited, then.
-
Re:Government Intervention
The blurb about terrorism concerns and remote detonating bombs sounds like more pointless scare-mongering with no increase in security.
Well, it actually is possible to use a cellphone to remote detonate a bomb. Simply wire the 'ringer' speaker to the detonator (you may need a transformer to alter voltage and current characterists) call the phone from the ground and ... boom! In fact, terrorists have already been doing this for quite sometime.
Of course, you still have the problem of getting the explosive past the TSA and, additionally, since cell phones are already surreptitiously being used on planes anyway...the risk is probably not a lot different with and without legal cell phone use. -
Re:Great Blazing Colors
I find that the contrast ratio of pure white on pure black is still too high, I favor white on grey rather like the way slashdot's "Reply to This" button looks. However having seen a friend's Kindle which uses reflected light, I find that the tradition black text on white background to be the most comfortable. I look forward to the day when there are full color, 60 FPS, reflected light monitors.
-
Re:In Apple's defense