Slashdot Mirror

This guy sums it up pretty well with a video on how to create a summer hit in two minutes. Yeah, it's a Facebook video link. Sorry.

Facebook's post

One wing prop stunt plane landing safely as well!

I don't want to be that guy that ruins everyone's joke at the party, but there are so many things wrong with this video, I doubt it's anything more than photoshop... I mean, just the physics of the landing seems totally wrong.

One wing prop stunt plane landing safely as well!

Sorry for it being a crapbook video link :( https://www.facebook.com/phros...

TFA says both that satire accounts are allowed and that users must use their real names. Google led me to a couple of FB pages citing their "real name" policy and their policy against maintaining more than one "personal" account. I couldn't quickly find any mention of satire accounts being allowed.

I think this Facebook photo post I just saw pretty much sums up Australia?

https://www.facebook.com/TheBe...

Comments to the FB post are largely by Aussies, may be worth reading. Or not.

Are you kidding, China is super diverse. They are like... 100% Asian!

That reminds me of something I recently saw about the diversity of Black Panther.

• 90% of cast is African or African-American

Analysis of a Recent Facebook company announcement:

Buried in a company announcement was acknowledgement that nearly all of its users have been targeted to some degree.

That makes about 2 billion users whose privacy was leaked.

Also, Facebook was trying to collect patient data from hospitals:

The idea was to build profiles of people that included their medical conditions, information that health systems have, as well as social and economic factors gleaned from Facebook.

Also also, Diamond and Silk (two pro-Trump bloggers from the election cycle) were deemed unsafe for the community by facebook. Their followers no longer receive a notice when they make a new post.

From Facebook:

"This decision is final and it is not appeal-able in any way." (Note: This is the exact wording that FB emailed to [Diamond and Silk].)

https://www.facebook.com/MythB...

THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO USES THAT YOU LISTED IN THAT ONE QUOTE is a difference that makes no difference.

You don't think that it's significant that in one instance the user knew they were handing over their information to a political campaign and in the other the user thought they were taking an innocent personality quiz? It doesn't excuse either one, but I think it's significant.

From Facebook's blog post, "Given the scale and sophistication of the activity we've seen, we believe most people on Facebook could have had their public profile scraped in this way. "

Every Facebook user has a "public profile". And when they say "most people on Facebook", they're not just talking about the Cambridge Analytica leak. They mean most users.

Information you share that is always public: Some of the information you give us when you fill out your profile is public, such as your age range, language and country. We also use a part of your profile, called your Public Profile, to help connect you with friends and family.

Cambridge Analytica accessed more than just the public profile. From that same Post article:

The third-party firm (Global Science Research) used a clicky personality quiz to get people to interact with the app, which then used a loophole to pull all the behind-the-scenes data of that user, and also the same data relating to all their friends -- typically 200-300 other people per user.

Updated documentation is available in another location:
https://developers.facebook.co...

This is still a big change without warning though.

Sorry but few things carry more hubris with them than claiming to be on the right side of history, if that is the claim you are making regarding the left. To say so means not only to completely understand all the intricate nuances of society and human needs and values but also to be able to predict the future -- and the alternative future. I saw more than one facebook friend on Nov 7 2016 calling people to cast their vote for Hillary so they are "on the right side of history."

If you've heard of PragerU you probably don't like them but if you are so inclined hear their argument on that one and decide for yourself: https://www.facebook.com/prage...

OK, here it is: https://www.facebook.com/legal... Oh, and don't forget to keep checking up on it and re-reading it in case they've changed something, which they can do at any time.

And BTW, ToS aren't for users, they're there to create legal loopholes to evade legal action against Facebook.

The Facebook privacy policy says they will access your address book, but it doesn't say they will access your call data. It seems like they are going beyond what they are saying they will do. That's kind of weird, because you expect their lawyers to be on top of this kind of stuff.

Not that anyone reads the privacy policy.

It's really hard for me to feel outrage about this......something that's been a problem for years, and now they went a little farther so you are worried?

Problem with Facebook is we post a new job or school or city because we want friends to know how we are doing. It's not for Facebook to take that information and sell it...

No, "we" do not. Speak for yourself. I don't post jack shit to Facebook. My friends? I talk to them. They know how I am doing because I speak to them. My new job is not fodder for my so-called "friends" to stare mindlessly into their phones. As for that last bit, you may want to review this before your next visit back to Facebook. It's obvious you've never read it.

You own all of the content and information you post on Facebook, and you can control how it is shared through your privacy and application settings. In addition:

For content that is covered by intellectual property rights, like photos and videos (IP content), you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License). This IP License ends when you delete your IP content or your account unless your content has been shared with others, and they have not deleted it.

Yes, your personal writings and announcements of new jobs and schools are covered by IP. And that last part "others" is not clearly defined, now is it? Here, go read the rest... it's good shit!

https://www.facebook.com/terms...

Here's fb propaganda.

Here's an employee's take

When the truth is that they work for an advertising company that pimp's out their user's data to anyone who pays them. The "tech" they're developing is just new ways to scam users out of their information.

facebook employees are like the whores who think they are the fiancé of the guy "giving" them money and gifts.

FTC is only investigating whether Facebook violated its terms of service. Have you ever read that document? It's pages and pages of legalese that basically says Facebook can do whatever they want with your data. Ensuring that they complied with their TOS is a really, really low bar.

“This was unequivocally not a data breach,” tweeted Andrew Bosworth, a Facebook executive. “No systems were infiltrated, no passwords or information were stolen or hacked.”

So, what really happened is that a bunch of people installed a bunch of Facebook apps, and the users authorized their personal data to be used by the app. What happened after that was standard Facebook Business Model stuff, they sell your eyeballs to advertisers and take a 30% share of sales. It's how all social media stays in business, by passively collecting data about you, where you eat, your income levels, what you buy, etc. All in the name of "targeted advertising", which we as users frankly embrace. We love seeing ads for things that may interest us, companies like the opportunity of us buying stuff, FB loves collecting data and giving it to the govern.... I mean collecting data.

The difference here is that even with that authorization there were things that Kogan (who collected that data) and CA were not allowed to do with that data. And even after Kogan and CA claimed to have destroyed the data they were still misusing that data.

I agree it's a very difficult policy to enforce, and if you're in the habit of clicking agree some of those 3rd parties are probably violating it, but it doesn't change the fact that Kogan and CA are one of those scummy 3rd parties misusing your data.

“This was unequivocally not a data breach,” tweeted Andrew Bosworth, a Facebook executive. “No systems were infiltrated, no passwords or information were stolen or hacked.”

So, what really happened is that a bunch of people installed a bunch of Facebook apps, and the users authorized their personal data to be used by the app. What happened after that was standard Facebook Business Model stuff, they sell your eyeballs to advertisers and take a 30% share of sales. It's how all social media stays in business, by passively collecting data about you, where you eat, your income levels, what you buy, etc. All in the name of "targeted advertising", which we as users frankly embrace. We love seeing ads for things that may interest us, companies like the opportunity of us buying stuff, FB loves collecting data and giving it to the govern.... I mean collecting data.

So, if we the public are clicking Accept every time we want to do a survey, or use a service, or install an app.... the horse is out of the barn. Then we get to Cambridge Analytica, who is accused of using personality quiz apps to gather information.. yeah, which is pretty much the whole purpose of those little quizzes to find your interests. The user answers a bazillion personal questions, and it spits out "Your Medieval Name Would Be Patsy", but what do you think happens to all that data after you click Commit? They aren't even building a profile of you, because Facebook already did that work by getting you to fill it out yourself. CA figured out, like Obama did in 2012. What do you think "big data" is really all about? Joining all these little data sets, like purchased this here, travelled there, likes flying, hates TSA, lives here, people that live here tend to earn this much, people that travel there and live here tend to vote this way, so hook them up with some targeted political ads and bam, you've increased your probability of an election win.

Q: "Did Cambridge Analytica Harvest 50 Million Facebook Profiles?"
A: TFA money quote: "hundreds of thousands of users were paid to take a personality test and agreed to have their data collected for academic use"

which implies that friend lists of 'hundreds of thousands' of participating (paid) users were used to issue an automated flurry of direct access to related profiles by user ID... and the rabbit hole went as deep as default 'public' profiles would permit. Like sheeple-product publicly declaring their family members and supplying relation codes because, they were asked, like it's all a fun computer game.

Some where past the 2 million mark or so Facebook (if they gave a damn) would have had tripwires snap and bright red flags dropping in front of their faces. Flags like direct and obvious API access abuse, access from one or a few accounts/networks faster than humanly possible, direct profile access by ID with no referrer page pointing to it, a 404 floods (if they were guessing). White hat 101 stuff. They do not care. They are on the verge of completely monetizing their APIs anyway to (finally!) inject real portfolio value into their company and want to hook institutional data junkies first.

But if anyone thinks data mining might have helped Trump win the election, it must be evil and frightening. Any data mining efforts to 'network' and oppose are kewl and just. This is as transparently duplicitous as Mayor Swivel-Head from The Nightmare Before Christmas.

I find it ironically hilarious -- without laughing -- that the same political contingent that blanches at the thought of a physical wall at the border of our sovereign country, is so easily duped into characterizing any IP access from the former Soviet bloc as the propaganda of Putin puppets, and not entrepreneurial enterprises for hire founded by young clever people like anywhere else in the connected world. The very same data games data mining Silicon Valley startups use to schmooze money from jargon-hypnotized investors or politically fueled troll farms like ShareBlue, when applied by clever Ukranian teenagers who are waiting for their Putin paycheck like I'm waiting for my Big Oil paycheck... becomes manipulative evil. It's almost even racist.

And when a Russian server farm operator tries to alert the world that Obama's FBI showed zero interest in obtaining logs from his rented servers that (he claimed) would illuminate another hop back to the attackers, you are forced to speculate that his Russian IP address was what the FBI was politically after.

Isn't it strange how this county map is so sharply delineated at the boundaries between populous urban centers and rural areas? Pretty precise to be a map of evil hacker influence, and funny how those (alleged) manipulated voters were targeted so completely and populous counties with their more centralized and automated voting systems, were not. Heck, it looks more like an actual grassroots uprising that won by a few hairs, assisted by the electoral college. A routine upset election, welcome to reality.

*sigh* The quality of Slashdot moderation continues to plummet. I understand FP skimming the headline and claiming something wrong, we all do that occasionally, but if you're a moderator please, please, confirm something is correct before you mod it as "Insightful" or something else implying it's right.

No, setting your Facebook Profile to "Private" does nothing to prevent a third party from accessing your data if you allow that third party to use your account for ID purposes.

Here's what TFA says (and, frankly, they're barely touching the actual ramifications):

However, the app also collected the information of the test-takersâ(TM) Facebook friends, leading to the accumulation of a data pool tens of millions-strong. Facebookâ(TM)s âoeplatform policyâ allowed only collection of friendsâ(TM) data to improve user experience in the app and barred it being sold on or used for advertising. The discovery of the unprecedented data harvesting, and the use to which it was put, raises urgent new questions about Facebookâ(TM)s role in targeting voters in the US presidential election. It comes only weeks after indictments of 13 Russians by the special counsel Robert Mueller which stated they had used the platform to perpetrate âoeinformation warfareâ against the US.

Facebook has something called the Graph API. Whenever you allow a "Facebook app" (such as those that let you automatically log into a website when you're logged into Facebook, or those that save your game status by connecting it to your Facebook ID, or those that use your Facebook ID to let you comment on their website (the ones that also allow you to use your Twitter or Google account I mean, not the Facebook comments plugin), and, as in this example, those that let you take "tests" that they then offer to post to your wall, they use the Graph API.

The Graph API gives developers access to a horrific amount of data on a user. And while the process of linking an app to an ID is supposed to include a warning to end users about what the app can access, in practice it is normal for apps to always ask for pretty much everything, which means users, in practice, ignore the warning.

No, setting your profile to private won't help you. And even if it did, so what? You're talking about a massive social engineering attack that Facebook's own practices directly encourages. Facebook pretty much encourages the authors of Candy Gems Saga The Game to ask for all your private information, so by the time the Kremlin Research Institute comes along and posts clickbait polls and surveys and quizzes, Facebook's users have been conditioned into thinking that's OK and normal and it's fine to allow them to do whatever they want.

And before you say "Well, so what, that's their fault for not being vigilant", they're not the only victims when the goal of those abusing Facebook's system is to try to manipulate large numbers of people into voting against their nation's interests.

They haven't yet - https://www.facebook.com/Justi...

https://www.facebook.com/Tucke...

Busted quite simply and thoroughly. They know when you're sitting or standing, or exiting a vehicle, with everything supposedly turned off.

Has been busted fabricating news ON VIDEO, no less than 2 DOZEN times in the past decade alone...

So like nothing compared to the record of Fox News?

when did FB accounts become important enough that anyone really cares if their long unused account gets taken over?

Since sites like Slashdot started offering Facebook Login as a login option.

Where did FB say they were pretending to be Americans?

here, to wit:

We have been investigating this for many months, and for a while we had found no evidence of fake accounts linked to Russia running ads. When we recently uncovered this activity, we provided that information to the special counsel.

This is not very well written, so I've italicized the relevant bits. They didn't find any of this while it was going on, but later were able to identify the fake accounts.

Dude, Where's My Car?

They cost me almost $20 in overage text fees last month. I disabled text messages a couple of months ago as described here:

https://www.facebook.com/help/170960386370271?helpref=faq_content

But, I'm still getting them.

sure, no problem: https://facebook.com/groups/we...

Articles I've read say the jurors did get to see the footage but that the video was not shared with the public until after the acquittal.

The inscription on the officer's gun ("You're fucked") was inadmissible in court.

Related video where Laney Sweet (Daniel's widow) talks about how the video was withheld from the public during trial and includes audio conversation with the county attorney. She was also not allowed to view the video without agreeing to be silenced on some of its content.
Also a related facebook group (JusticeForDaniel).

Facebook have done measurements that show v6 as giving ~10-15% faster page loads compared to v4. On some specific ISPs the difference will be even higher (for instance T-Mobile in the US backhaul all of their v4 traffic across the country to the datacenters that host their NAT64 infrastructure, while routing v6 more directly).

as far as I remember (I ditched winamp a long time ago), "double size" mode just magnified the low-resolution art by 2x, so the interface looked like the screenshot here or see the comparison here. The text in that screenshot is barely legible.

There are still copies of the original out there if you take the time to look.

For instance, there's this one ...

Unfortunately I'm unable to read it because of this:

# Block Facebook IPv4
127.0.0.1 api.ak.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 api.connect.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 api.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 app.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 apps.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 ar-ar.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 badge.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 blog.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 connect.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 connect.facebook.net
127.0.0.1 de-de.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 developers.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 es-la.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 external.ak.fbcdn.net
127.0.0.1 facebook.com
127.0.0.1 facebook.de
127.0.0.1 facebook.fr
127.0.0.1 fb.me
127.0.0.1 fbcdn.net
127.0.0.1 fr-fr.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 hi-in.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 it-it.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 ja-jp.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 login.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 profile.ak.fbcdn.net
127.0.0.1 pt-br.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 ssl.connect.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 static.ak.connect.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 static.ak.fbcdn.net
127.0.0.1 www.facebook.com
127.0.0.1 www.facebook.de
127.0.0.1 www.facebook.fr
127.0.0.1 zh-cn.facebook.com
# Block Facebook IPv6
fe80::1%lo0 facebook.com
fe80::1%lo0 login.facebook.com
fe80::1%lo0 www.login.facebook.com
fe80::1%lo0 fbcdn.net
fe80::1%lo0 www.fbcdn.net
fe80::1%lo0 fbcdn.com
fe80::1%lo0 www.fbcdn.com
fe80::1%lo0 static.ak.fbcdn.net
fe80::1%lo0 static.ak.connect.facebook.com
fe80::1%lo0 connect.facebook.net
fe80::1%lo0 www.connect.facebook.net
fe80::1%lo0 apps.facebook.com ::1 www.facebook.com ::1 facebook.com ::1 login.facebook.com ::1 www.login.facebook.com ::1 fbcdn.net ::1 www.fbcdn.net ::1 fbcdn.com ::1 www.fbcdn.com ::1 static.ak.fbcdn.net ::1 static.ak.connect.facebook.com ::1 connect.facebook.net ::1 www.connect.facebook.net ::1 apps.facebook.com
# block IPs above

Mod parent +1 Instightful, please.

Social media sites (including this one) are pretty much what you make them. I joined FB because I'm a writer - and there are readers there. Also other writers. And cover artists. And a whole bunch of useful resources that go with them. I also managed to reconnect with folks I hadn't realized I missed until we stumbled across each other there, which was pure serendipity for me.

I still try (and generally succeed) to limit my FB time to half-an-hour or so a day, unless I decide to post an essay. Then it's longer - but only because I count the time I spend composing essays to post on FB as time spent on FB.

For instance, there's this one ...

We've done a lot of work and research with outside experts and academics to understand the effects of our service on well-being, and we're using it to inform our product development.

And yet their terms of service still read like a privacy and classist nightmare. Too young? OMG nudity? Multiple accounts? On some retribution list? Fake name? Your IP becomes their IP, too. Compare with Slashdot's "Comments owned by the poster." There's plenty more. Go read at that link.

Near as I can tell, the only reason anyone would use Facebook is because they're stupid or completely ignorant of the TOS.

For those of you who have followed your doctor's orders to manage your diabetes and discovered, it just gets worse over time.. here's another option.. https://www.facebook.com/group... See the pinned post which has a link to all of the literature. The idea is that not only do you eat low carb, but eat 70% fats as an energy source. Moderate protein. Basically it's a keto diet. The diabetes isn't cured but since you are only eating 20 carbs a day, you are only needing insulin for 20 carbs a day. If your body needs more, it breaks down your own body fat to get it. Protein has carbs too so the protein intake is moderate. Many members achieve a 4.5 to 5 A1C and reduce or eliminate any needs for medicine. This group has about 42K members..

Yeah, that's my campaign. I had also started work on a piece of literature for the universal dividend, which generally follows GDP-per-capita (it follows income-per-capita, which is approximately the same thing, minus pre-tax savings such as 401(k) and IRA). I actually like that graph, because it shows the benefit's tendency to itself increase over time.

This is a completely-new approach, and has interesting properties stemming from the simple mechanism of making the poor less-poor. It takes in money and pays out twice-monthly, so acts as an aid package (for the poor) and an economic stimulus (for everyone), with properties of both.

Because it increases faster than inflation--it reflects a portion of GDP-per-capita, which means it reflects a portion of productivity, and grows more than cost-of-living--it tends to elevate the poor further out of poverty as the economy grows by technical progress. That, in turn, cuts back the need for welfare services, which have tended to require continuous increases in tax rate while still underperforming in their mission of reducing poverty. Cutting into Social Security--basically, having Retirement and Disability bridge the gap between what you should receive under those programs (e.g. when retired) and what you already receive as a fact of being an adult--allows us to guarantee the same level of total benefit while reducing the payroll tax (carried by the poor and middle-class).

All of this means the effectiveness of our anti-poverty programs increases while the tax rates required to run them decreases. When you account the Dividend as a rolling tax refund, the tax burden comes down immensely. This is structured such that you actually see a decrease in top income bracket tax rate, so it's not only a major cut on the middle-class and a major aid package to the poor, but a small cut to the upper-income earners. That, in turn, leaves us headroom to transfer some of that tax burden to funding a healthcare public option, rather than simply cutting taxes for the rich.

Yes, healthcare for 100% of Americans without raising taxes, when you factor in the effects of the Dividend as a new fiscal approach.

As an economic stimulus, we get the effect of the poor and middle-class being provided spending money regardless of employment. This helps carry them when the economy is disrupted; and it helps businesses retain an income flow, thus slowing job loss and speeding recovery, making recessions shorter and less-severe. In poor areas like Baltimore, the additional cash flow--coming from outside the local economy--creates additional spending capacity, thus the capacity for new jobs.

Think about Target: they put a store in Baltimore, and everything they sell is made outside Baltimore--sending part of their revenue out of the city, and bringing no new income into the city. That just bleeds our local economy. With new money coming from outside, enabling purchasing, the revenue can thus support wages for the jobs required by Target. Part of that money goes right back out; part of it goes into the hands of cashiers and inventory specialists. Now you have cash flow in (Dividend) and cash flow out, and so can support some additional jobs. The area tends to become wealthier and more middle-class, without gentrification: we put money into the hands of the people already there, instead of swapping them for rich kids.

So you end up with stronger economies and bigger profits from this kind of approach. Lower tax burdens, better economic stability. Your businesses can take bigger risks and make better advancements, bigger rewards.

It's not like buy-in is going to be easy; it's achievable, though. First, I need to get voted in. Our current crop of Congressmen only care about the same old political talking points and won't push for progressive policy.

CBS have declined to explain but a bit of searching turns up this

https://www.facebook.com/RedXS...
https://archive.fo/eoZiN

https://www.facebook.com/Tracy...
https://archive.fo/IcXKV

https://www.facebook.com/notes...
https://archive.fo/ywhAk

tl;dr - nothing particularly interesting. Archive links because FB will probably pull his account to protect us all from reading his rather empty, but basically harmless rants.

CBS have declined to explain but a bit of searching turns up this

https://www.facebook.com/RedXS...
https://archive.fo/eoZiN

https://www.facebook.com/Tracy...
https://archive.fo/IcXKV

https://www.facebook.com/notes...
https://archive.fo/ywhAk

tl;dr - nothing particularly interesting. Archive links because FB will probably pull his account to protect us all from reading his rather empty, but basically harmless rants.

CBS have declined to explain but a bit of searching turns up this

https://www.facebook.com/RedXS...
https://archive.fo/eoZiN

https://www.facebook.com/Tracy...
https://archive.fo/IcXKV

https://www.facebook.com/notes...
https://archive.fo/ywhAk

tl;dr - nothing particularly interesting. Archive links because FB will probably pull his account to protect us all from reading his rather empty, but basically harmless rants.

Mine was deleted last month actually. https://www.facebook.com/help/...

Takes 14 days to fully commit, so long as you don't log in between that time. After that, if you attempt to log, it won't recognize your e-mail address anymore (not even for a password reset too). But, there is a link to recover the account - I don't dare touch that. That evil can stay asleep forever!

I'M LIBERATED! FUCK YOU ZUCK!

If you are interested in this topic, or if you have children, you must read this:

https://www.facebook.com/notes...

Quote from the maifesto:
"If you are playing a game for next to nothing – or free – and you find out people are spending thousands, or tens of thousands, or in some cases hundreds of thousands of dollars – there may be a problem."

I felt awful after reading this,

Fox News - Home | Facebook

How about a 'load canonical page' setting in the google search options?

Yeah, but then other surveillance companies will monitor you, instead of just Google.

AMP was created as a response to Facebook's "Instant Articles," which is pretty much the same idea, but with Facebook as the surveillance company instead of Google.

Apparently, it's not acceptable to serve ads without a few megabytes of javascript spyware, which is why the "mobile web" hard performance issues to begin with.

Impeach Donald Trump Now

Impeach Donald J. Trump: The Million American Petition

Impeach Donald Trump Now

Impeach Donald Trump

Need to Impeach. "Donald Trump has brought us to the brink of nuclear war, obstructed justice, and taken money from foreign governments. We need to impeach this dangerous president."

Impeach Trump

Demand impeachment of Donald J. Trump

Sign Robert Reich's petition: Impeach Donald Trump

Impeach Donald Trump

Impeach TRUMP - PENCE

IMPEACH DONALD TRUMP & PENCE

Demand an Impeachment of Trump and Mike Pence, and All those associated with him, NOW!!!

Impeach Trump and Pence

Impeach Donald Trump Now

Impeach Donald J. Trump: The Million American Petition

Impeach Donald Trump Now

Impeach Donald Trump

Need to Impeach. "Donald Trump has brought us to the brink of nuclear war, obstructed justice, and taken money from foreign governments. We need to impeach this dangerous president."

Impeach Trump

Demand impeachment of Donald J. Trump

Sign Robert Reich's petition: Impeach Donald Trump

Impeach Donald Trump

Impeach TRUMP - PENCE

IMPEACH DONALD TRUMP & PENCE

Demand an Impeachment of Trump and Mike Pence, and All those associated with him, NOW!!!

Impeach Trump and Pence

I suspect the shrill level is through the roof after Tuesday's election results.

Wrong:

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocratsLogic/photos/a.1647169182167657.1073741828.1646874365530472/2001221336762438/?type=3&theater

So the conservtive radio hosts aren't complaining at all? You are a completely typical Trump voter, Yoiu seem to think that complete non sequitars are somehow relevant to the discussion at hand. My post just to have some tiny yet hopeful wish that you might engage in conversations wirth adults, is that I was remarking on the reactions of people like Limbaught and savage. Not some douchebag outfiut like Occupy Democrats. Don't rtefer to them, and I won't refer to Trumps NeoNazi and White Supremacists fine people. Kapeche?

Now go away until you can carry on a conversation with adults.

I suspect the shrill level is through the roof after Tuesday's election results.

Wrong:

https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocratsLogic/photos/a.1647169182167657.1073741828.1646874365530472/2001221336762438/?type=3&theater