Domain: google.co.uk
Stories and comments across the archive that link to google.co.uk.
Comments · 2,282
-
./'d
Google cache.
-
Re:One, two, three, four, I declare a flame-war!
yep.. if 35 gangsters come into your house (assuming they don't have assault weapons), you can have a gatling gun and you're still fucked.
-
Mirror
-
Re:they are true, and I've checked out #4 carefull
I was reading what "the other side" had to say, and this sentence made me choke with disbelief:
The Department of Defense is fully aware of its responsibility for the safe use of depleted uranium
SAFE?!
(from here) -
Re:There's not enough hamsters in the world to...
That's why the Google cache is powered by Pigeons.
-
Re:SP2 - as secure as any linux distro...
Root? Unfortunately privilege escalation seems to very big problem which does not get as much attention as it deserves.
Its critical that you know and trust your users and take care of what applications you decide to run especially as plenty of exploits are readily available.
As for the spoofing "Security Center" it ignores the fact that evil.exe required a prerequisite compromise to have taken place.
-
Shocking
But not as shocking as this
-
Re:OS and browser stats still up on Canadian Googl
As is the UK version.
Now can anyone explain why on earth the top searched query in the UK for June 2004 was "european spear fishing". I mean WTF?? The top google link for that is even a googlebomb advertising page for the swiss version of iFriends (at least that's what it looks like, I haven't clicked).
My mind boggles. -
Re:Google Cache?
-
the future
Classical Marxist theory states you have a Working Class and a Ruling Class. The Working Class has exactly one asset, its labour. The Ruling Class ultimately depends for its survival on the Working Class.
According to this model, the Working Class could use its labour just to support itself, and say a big fat "screw you" to the Ruling Class -- and do less work into the bargain, to the tune of whatever it was costing to keep the Ruling Class in luxury goods. This is what most people think of as "revolution", and it usually goes T.U. when the organisers of the Revolution, having won the respect of the people, start falling into the decadent ways of the former Ruling Class.
Well, that may have worked in a manufacturing economy when the Working Class was doing things like growing food, building houses, making cars, &c. But today, thanks to a combination of automating many jobs out of existence and outsourcing the rest, a new class has emerged: the Consuming Class. The Consuming Class own DVD players and cell phones (made, BTW, using a labour force to whom such things would largely be useless), and think they are above the Working Class. The Consuming Class does work, but it is meaningless and irrelevant: what the heck is a telephone sanitiser going to do after the revolution? And on the flipside, who will till the soil, grind the grain, bake the bread? Who will build the homes, do the wiring and the plumbing? Marxist theory suggests the Consuming Class would perish before the Ruling Class, since the latter at least usually has savings.
The other reason why Classical Marxist theory doesn't apply anymore is that -- as far as some kinds of things are concerned -- we are now living in an age of plenty rather than an age of scarcity, and that really tends to muck up the traditional concept of value which underpins both Capitalism and Socialism. When it takes hardly any more work to make a thousand or a million examples of something than it took to make the first, how do you decide what price to sell it for?
As a former New Age Traveller, I have first hand experience of attempting a unilateral declaration of independence, and it isn't easy. Every so often, you still run up against a dependency on some big corporation or another: the supermarkets, the oil companies, and -- for some of my friends -- the NHS.
Social change is needed alright, but a lot of people are going to get hurt when it comes. -
Re:Figures
I used to have a VIA based mobo, it was my first DDR based system. Superb performance, barely stable though. I used to spend half my time fighting with bizarre errors and the like, trying to work out why some odd crashes were occuring. I've pretty much sworn against using VIA ever again after that, although I do aknowledge that is quite a foolish attitude, everyone makes mistakes now and then. In the future it may be they do produce a decent chipset, and I'll end up going back on my word. A few months after getting the VIA system, I upgraded to an Nforce2 based system (Abit NF7), and blinked in stunned amazement as the system remained steady as a rock. I've had just one system crash since I switched to Nforce2, superb overclockability, and very respectable performance (easily beating some 'top end' P4s at stuff like SETI unit crunching, in part due to dual channel memory) googlecached:OcUK SETI benchmarks
Given the toaster ovens that Intel is now maskerading as processors, I'm very glad my XP-M runs so cool, and with so little in the way of cooling (one 75mm HSF unit, one 120mm 7 volted exhaust fan, one ultra-quiet SilenX 60mm intake), I'm running faster, cooler, quieter and for cheaper than machines mine outperforms.
Someone remind me, why should I use Intel?
-
Some of the 1%
Nelson Mandela
Mahatma Gandhi
35 of the US Founding Fathers
Cherie Booth QC (who still takes human rights cases against her husband's government, and wins, and incidentally earns 4x more than the PM)
Some of the above, and some more obscure ones, are listed here
However there's still a long way to go when google asks, in response to the search for "great lawyers",
"Did you mean: great leaders?"! -
Re:Why single out those two?
Slashdot is certainly not without stories about the Netherlands (whose language one can easily mock in text): http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=netherlands+site
% 3Aslashdot.org -
Re:Sounds good to me
There may not be chips that design chips, but there is some funky 'computers that design chips' stuff, which i guess kinda means that chips already are designing each other...
Oh dear, we are so boned, i mean you've seen the documentory Terminator?
Erm anyway, there is some stuff where you describe the problem, and it works out what to build, although as with any abstraction, it ain't as efficent. (and it ain't quite that simple :(
Links,
http://www.verilog.com/
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=VHDL
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088247/ -
Re:Unfair test
The real test for me is, "Is the link back to the official site? Or does it look like a link and take you to some mysterious 3rd party server?"
There's an even simpler test than that, one which even the most tech-illiterate user should be able to master: "Do I have an account with this company?" Applying that test instantly identifies most of the phishing attempts I get (and obviously can't be used with this test.)
If that one passes, then look at where the links go to, but be aware of how cunning some of them are: one trick they use is to have an image map to the fake page inside a link to the bank's real page - the real page's URL is shown in the status bar but clicking it goes to the fake page. And the fake pages often just redirect to the real page, and open a pop-up window with a fake page asking for details. So looking at the address in the status bar shows the URL of the real page and the real page is opened in the main browser window, with the phisher's page in a pop-up which doesn't have an address bar (so it's not obvious that it's not a real page.) See this thread in news.admin.net-abuse.email for a disection of a phish using this trick. -
Re:Ah hah
-
Re:Good newswww.sciencenet.org.uk (google cache) says:
"A coin dropped from the [Eiffel] tower would reach terminal velocity after about 350 metres. At this terminal velocity it would be travelling at about 80ms-1 (179miles per hour; 288kmh-1)and could probably hurt someones skull."There are no calculations given, so feel free to take this with a pinch of salt.
I'd give you the direct link, but I had to fish this out of Google's cache as the site's already over quota.
Tom.
-
Why?
-
Re:The winner is (not necessarily) foo@bar.comAs iantri pointed out, these googlings mean nothing as Google ignores the "@" sign. Actually, it doesn't ignore it exactly but seems to match it to whitespace and some other characters. Quotes don't help nor does "+". So a search for my old favourite dumping address, "x@x.com", matches "X / X-Com" and "X: X-COM" etc. (FYI x.com happens to redirect to PayPay.)
Can anyone:
a) Explain the behaviour of non-standard characters in Google;
b) Come up with a way to correctly search for an email address?
Here's something to start the ball rolling:
sl@shdot -> 9 Google results with only sl-shdot in evidence.- This seems to find "sl/.shdot" and "sl-shdot".
- So I assume @ / . and - are treated as "any other characters".
- Appears to match slshdot and sl-shdot
- So it seems hyphens are just ignored in search criteria and results.
- Seems to be the same as a search for sl shdot
- I'd conclude these characters are converted to whitespace in results and search criteria. It would match "sl something shdot"
-
Re:The winner is (not necessarily) foo@bar.comAs iantri pointed out, these googlings mean nothing as Google ignores the "@" sign. Actually, it doesn't ignore it exactly but seems to match it to whitespace and some other characters. Quotes don't help nor does "+". So a search for my old favourite dumping address, "x@x.com", matches "X / X-Com" and "X: X-COM" etc. (FYI x.com happens to redirect to PayPay.)
Can anyone:
a) Explain the behaviour of non-standard characters in Google;
b) Come up with a way to correctly search for an email address?
Here's something to start the ball rolling:
sl@shdot -> 9 Google results with only sl-shdot in evidence.- This seems to find "sl/.shdot" and "sl-shdot".
- So I assume @ / . and - are treated as "any other characters".
- Appears to match slshdot and sl-shdot
- So it seems hyphens are just ignored in search criteria and results.
- Seems to be the same as a search for sl shdot
- I'd conclude these characters are converted to whitespace in results and search criteria. It would match "sl something shdot"
-
Re:The winner is (not necessarily) foo@bar.comAs iantri pointed out, these googlings mean nothing as Google ignores the "@" sign. Actually, it doesn't ignore it exactly but seems to match it to whitespace and some other characters. Quotes don't help nor does "+". So a search for my old favourite dumping address, "x@x.com", matches "X / X-Com" and "X: X-COM" etc. (FYI x.com happens to redirect to PayPay.)
Can anyone:
a) Explain the behaviour of non-standard characters in Google;
b) Come up with a way to correctly search for an email address?
Here's something to start the ball rolling:
sl@shdot -> 9 Google results with only sl-shdot in evidence.- This seems to find "sl/.shdot" and "sl-shdot".
- So I assume @ / . and - are treated as "any other characters".
- Appears to match slshdot and sl-shdot
- So it seems hyphens are just ignored in search criteria and results.
- Seems to be the same as a search for sl shdot
- I'd conclude these characters are converted to whitespace in results and search criteria. It would match "sl something shdot"
-
Re:The winner is (not necessarily) foo@bar.comAs iantri pointed out, these googlings mean nothing as Google ignores the "@" sign. Actually, it doesn't ignore it exactly but seems to match it to whitespace and some other characters. Quotes don't help nor does "+". So a search for my old favourite dumping address, "x@x.com", matches "X / X-Com" and "X: X-COM" etc. (FYI x.com happens to redirect to PayPay.)
Can anyone:
a) Explain the behaviour of non-standard characters in Google;
b) Come up with a way to correctly search for an email address?
Here's something to start the ball rolling:
sl@shdot -> 9 Google results with only sl-shdot in evidence.- This seems to find "sl/.shdot" and "sl-shdot".
- So I assume @ / . and - are treated as "any other characters".
- Appears to match slshdot and sl-shdot
- So it seems hyphens are just ignored in search criteria and results.
- Seems to be the same as a search for sl shdot
- I'd conclude these characters are converted to whitespace in results and search criteria. It would match "sl something shdot"
-
Re:He's got a point..
Windows has the Windows Scripting Host installed by default (has since 98)
Umm.. perhaps, but since it's not on any documentation supplied with windows, or any menu/icon/taskbar they're not exactly encouraging you to use it, are they?your page isn't listed highly in Google because not many people link to it
Hmm.. I'm not complaining I'm not highly listed, I'm complaining I'm not listed at all. For example, if I search for an obscure phrase that IS on my website, I get sites that link to my site, but not my site itself... at all.. I've tried submitting the site twice in the last 6 months with no luck. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong when I submit the URL or maybe my ISP blocks Google but not other web crawlers? I know it's not a conspiracy, but it feels like it, and I've had other friends complain of the same thing!
Oh well, someday I'll work it out.. -
Re:He's got a point..
Windows has the Windows Scripting Host installed by default (has since 98)
Umm.. perhaps, but since it's not on any documentation supplied with windows, or any menu/icon/taskbar they're not exactly encouraging you to use it, are they?your page isn't listed highly in Google because not many people link to it
Hmm.. I'm not complaining I'm not highly listed, I'm complaining I'm not listed at all. For example, if I search for an obscure phrase that IS on my website, I get sites that link to my site, but not my site itself... at all.. I've tried submitting the site twice in the last 6 months with no luck. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong when I submit the URL or maybe my ISP blocks Google but not other web crawlers? I know it's not a conspiracy, but it feels like it, and I've had other friends complain of the same thing!
Oh well, someday I'll work it out.. -
I'm a programmer
I suspect a lot of people here are. To me, and probably to most of them, UML is Unified Modelling Language. Hell, do a google search for UML and the top hit is to the UML website.
I know it's too much to ask OSS projects not to pick confusing acronyms and names, but I'd like to think that story submitters or at least editors could a little clearer. -
Re:Nothing new under the sun
As far as I know, the ring-a-rosies rhyme comes from the black death in the middle ages, quite a bit earlier than the cold war you seem to connect it with.
-
Re:Google cluster?I don't think that you could use google's cluster to compute 42
-
Re:Balloon
The program was called "Crafty Tricks of War" and was shown on BBC2 earlier this year. Very entertaining.
-
UK ISP revealed
Google reveals that the only web sites with sitebuilder/tandc.htm in their URLs are Freeserve/Wanadoo, and the pdf of the article describing the takedown. Therefore it must have been Freeserve or Wanadoo, who are the same company now. I'm glad I have started to move away from Freeserve, although most of my web site is still on their servers, I haven't migrated most of it yet.
-
In the UK.
The Green Party in the UK has a well thought out policy on Software Patents and IPR. A quote from their site:
The GP strongly opposes software patenting. Copyright works well enough to protect IPR (Intellectual Property Rights). The flag of IPR must not be used to give more power to rich corporations while preventing the general use of useful cheap software.
The only thing I'll add to their words is that the Green Party traditionally does well in the European Elections, so a vote for them can make a real difference. Also, where they don't get in, more votes for them is still more pressure on other parties to adopt similar policies.
The only other party that has a strong stance on this is the UK Independance Party, but that's only because they hate all foreigners. Greens are the saner (and less racist) option in the UK. -
Re:You know...
If you want to look into this more the proper term is "Relevance Feedback".
Not that I'm an IR student or anything. (IANAIRS) -
Re:How many jobs?
You didn't search for the grammar used by PHB's. The correct answer is 237; the 96 you got above would have to be others, more knowledgeable, talking about their experiences.
Proof.
-DrkShadow -
How many jobs?
-
Re:Wikipedia is working.
Try this Google cached page to donate while they are down.
-
Bill Joy??!!?If like me you were wondering as always it appears wikipedia has the answer... or so I thought !!!
Sorry! The wiki is experiencing some technical difficulties, and cannot contact the database server
Oh well never mind instead click here for a google cache of Bill's page on wikipedia
-
Re:my next pc? are you crazy?
So this kid spends an average of 1025 minutes a MONTH on his cell phone? That rivals most business people
If he uses 1,025 minutes in one month that is equivalent to 12,300 minutes per year. (1,025 x 12 months)
Which is 33.676283938921307392522844820568 minutes a day. (12,300 / 365.242199 days)
I think if you added up all the little phonecalls through the working day a lot of business people would beat this kid. Sorry for the big numbers but I wanted to
-
Re:Hemp Powered Cars
Well, there's plenty of sources which say Diesel used peanut oil, which of course does have the advantage of being easier to get hold of.
-
Re:Is googol trademarked?
I think the word you are looking for is Neologism
-
Well, here's a surveyFrom biodiesel.org: in PDF or Google html cache. It says that there's 80.5% energy efficiency. i.e. For every 5 units of fuel produced, one unit is consumed in its production or distribution. The comparable figure they give for petrodiesel is 83.28%.
Of course, it's up to you whether you choose to accept this study.
-
Sounds a lot like
This sounds a lot like an old, old experiment described by Simeon Poisson with the intention to prove that light travelled as particles, and not as waves. The idea being that if light travelled as waves according to Huygens' theory, then there would be a tiny bright spot in the shadow cast by a pin-head in a narrow beam of monochromatic light. Poisson wrote a paper ridiculing this. Dominique Arago set up an experiment to show once and for all how the absence of a bright spot would disprove the wave theory -- and there, indeed, right in the centre of the shadow, was a bright spot
..... -
Re:Salem Witch Trials: history repeating
I really don't have a problem with people looking at pictures. If some sicko is going to get his filthy rocks off, better from my point of view that he* does so into a box of Kleenex than into any kid of mine. If the picture was made in such a way that involved causing harm to a child, then yes, it's absolutely fair to go after the creator; and if the person who looks at it actually goes on to harm a child, again, it's fair to go after the abuser. But just looking at a picture does not alter the amount of harm done. In fact, if looking at pictures is enough to satisfy a person's urges, so he doesn't actually need to go out and abuse a child, then it's doing good.
But, it's easier to get a result by going after the people looking at the pictures than by going after the actual abusers. And when policemen are on a "points make prizes" system, simple economics take over.
I also think many people are afraid even to look at a child porn picture in case it awakens any latent paedophile tendency lurking in them. The subject is so emotionally charged, that it sets up a kind of positive feedback loop: anybody who questions the hanging, drawing and quartering of anyone remotely suspected of being a paedophile, risks being called one themself.
* I said "he", but women paedophiles do exist, and I wouldn't be surprised by a lesbian serial rapist ..... but that's another story for another time. -
Re:From tactical to practical
Actually, there is a biometric that is changeable ad infinitum: dynamic signature recognition. The reason I really like this one (and I'm thinking for commercial environments mainly) is that people are used to signing for things... You can change your signature if you want, and they're a damn sight harder to forge...
-
Google Cache
As the page is using the Nokia Webserver technology (running the site from a mobile!) here is the google cache
google cache link -
Re:Wasn't all that fast.....
Not only did it take a long time, but there are tons of stories, not to mention video and pictures which still have not been reported by mainstream media, (at least in America). In Europe, and the Arab world, one sees very different images. As an example, take a look at this video of America's finest punish some Iraqi's for taking wood: DontLoot.wmv, or try google
The question is not as much whether the images exist, it is whether gutless mainstream American media is willing to show it.
-
Why is a Patriot 'good'?Patriotism is the willingness to kill and be killed for trivial reasons.
Is being a patriot really a good thing?Patriot , n. One to whom the interests of a part seem superior to those of the whole. The dupe of statesmen and the tool of conquerors.
From a dictionary via Google
Of course, there are many other definitions, but I like thie one above.
Why is someone who fights others because "My country is better than your country" held in such high regard? After all, we despise those who fight and kill because their race "is better than yours".
Sorry for being a little off-topic, but maybe someone will know the answer. -
Re:Ahhhhhhhh
It's probably something to do with why a woman only has to do a job half as well as a man to be thought ten times as good. Or why women are physically incapable of committing crimes and shouldn't be punished for them even if they do. Or the way women insist that only they can do several jobs at the same time, then proceed to do so, badly and taking longer overall than the sum of the time taken to complete each one sequentially, yet still praise one another for doing it.
There is a serious anti-male bias in society today. It starts young: boys are underperforming in schools yet all the money is spent on improving things for girls. Planning to have sex with a woman? You'd better make sure she doesn't falsely accuse you of rape, otherwise you'll always be labelled a rapist even if you never fucked her. It goes on throughout life: try getting custody of your own kids if your ex-wife moves in with a loony who drags her down to his level. {Single fathers, while they are rare, certainly seem to do a better job than some of the single mothers I've met}. Even if your name is on the birth certificate, you'll have a hell of a job and you risk your reputation {she only has to tell one lie and there'll be an angry mob outside your door baying for your blood}. And it lasts all the way until you die: men have a shorter life expectancy than women, yet {until recently} had to wait longer to receive their retirement pension.
At least nonce is now an equal-opportunity profession. -
Stonehenge was rebuilt itself anyway...(maybe)
Given that claims have been made in recent years that stonehenge itself was almost completely rebuilt in the 20th century (based on evidence like constables paintings and contemporary photos), I don't understand why anyone would get their backup about a reproduction being made. (Granted there were many counter claims) [Personally I'd be interested in seeing even the techniques used even in 1902 reemployed in NZ]
-
Re:How Endurance Crater Got Its Name
name other features after the members of Shackleton's crew
Was Mrs Chippy considered? -
GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH
here
This thing looks really cool! -
Re:BBC = british government
I confess to not knowing that much about this topic, but I still don't think you can say the codec is owned by the government. Even if it was, it doesn't really matter being GPLed etc.
Although it's not an authoritative source, I refer you to this article on Google Groups which states, amongst other things, that "The BBC is run under a Royal Charter, not by the government" and "But it was part of the Government to start with, yes? The BBC was not, and has never been, and will never been part of the British Government."