Slashdot Mirror


Hobbit Hole + World Class Fallout Shelter

ChaosMt writes "Slashdot has covered buying missile silos before, along with buying old microwave bunkers to provide the ultimate level of data protection. Making your own Hobbit hole has been covered too. Now you can have it all in the best shelter I've ever seen (even beating the Subterranean Fortress) in an undisclosed location outside of Durango, Colorado. It may not be your cup of tea, but it is very impressive to see and compare to your own disaster planning."

179 comments

  1. Secure but ... by mmarlett · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... it doesn't handle Slashdotting.

    1. Re:Secure but ... by pHatidic · · Score: 0

      Yeah if it can't even handle a little slashdotting then how am I supposed to keep downloading my gig a second of porno during a nuclear holocaust. Secure my ass, whoever bought this should ask for their money back.

    2. Re:Secure but ... by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder how well the Ultimate Secure Home handles an internal fire caused by a burning webserver.

    3. Re:Secure but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparantly even http packets cannot penetrate this fortress.

    4. Re:Secure but ... by rts008 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Agreed...besides, much cheaper to buy an old house in the sticks and move into the septic tank- you already have running water...just add electric and your good to go

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    5. Re:Secure but ... by dejamatt · · Score: 5, Informative
    6. Re:Secure but ... by moofdaddy · · Score: 1, Funny

      Agreed...besides, much cheaper to buy an old house in the sticks and move into the septic tank- you already have running water...just add electric and your good to go

      To get down you just have to get in the toliet and flush

      --
      Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
    7. Re:Secure but ... by SnoBall · · Score: 0

      can it stand up to the armies of Sauron?

      --
      Don't eat me ... *looks at nickname* ... okay, eat me.
    8. Re:Secure but ... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 1

      What good is all that data if everyone were dead?

      I don't know.. but I can't imagine some aliens coming to a frozen earth after a nuclear winter, salvage that data centre, look at all those financial records, and conclude that all humans are just a bunch of money grabbing weasels (ala enron/worldcom/you-name-it-american-corp) fashion.

      Instead of making such nice bunkers we should ensure that no bomb gets used in the first place!

    9. Re:Secure but ... by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Not Found
      The requested URL /secure_home.htm was not found on this server.
      Hey,offline and out of reach is the best security.
      well except for armed retaliation i guess.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    10. Re:Secure but ... by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      Anybody got a mirror of the mirror of the mirror? Hours later and still nothing on the main site or cache. I want my links!

    11. Re:Secure but ... by ecloud · · Score: 1

      Coral doesn't seem to be handling slashdotting too well either. Bummer!

  2. Paranoia by CaptainBaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow, these guys really are preying on your fears, aren't they? Remember all the nutjobs who ran for the hills in the middle of all the Y2K panic? That was funny enough, but pushing this kind of place, on the vague premise that 'there hasn't been a virulent epidemic for a while now', is just silly...

    1. Re:Paranoia by toetagger1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just RTFA, and I agree:

      "The truth is, there is a smorgasbord of infectious agents and diseases out there waiting to be released, contracted, and spread - plague, tularemia, SARS, Ebola, Marburg, West Nile virus, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, to name just a few.

      Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is suspected to be passed to humans from cattle and other animals that have Mad Cow Disease. As far as I know, they aren't even sure yet if that is true. Nor is there proof that the diesaes spreads between humans.

      --
      who | grep -i blond | date cd ~; unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleep
    2. Re:Paranoia by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      but pushing this kind of place, on the vague premise that 'there hasn't been a virulent epidemic for a while now', is just silly...

      I dunno, i'm not afraid of any of that stuff, but this still seems rather appealing. The level to which he has chosen to "get away from it all" is perhaps a little extreme for my tastes, but it definately has its good points.

    3. Re:Paranoia by BoldAC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On a related subject and much more practical...

      Did you know you can get a stormproof room in your house?

      We were recently building a new house and our contractor said for $3k he could make a "safe room" for us.

      I let him do it...

      So when the next hurricane/tornado comes, the only things left in the house will be my family and my servers. :)

      AC

    4. Re:Paranoia by someme2 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is suspected to be passed to humans from cattle and other animals that have Mad Cow Disease. [...] Nor is there proof that the diesaes spreads between humans.

      Very true! I think we can dare to go a step further and say: Nor is there proof that spread of a disease that you get from eating cows can be prevented by hiding in an underground bunker complex.

      Also, my favorite part is the end of the article:

      Because of the owner's illness and major surgery, the house is currently being offered at only 65% of the actual building costs.

      So, go buy it! Play it safe!!! Don't risk illness!
      --
      You can attach boosters to anything. It just costs more. -
      Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 07, @12:26PM
    5. Re:Paranoia by TheMeuge · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually there is proof. A little while ago, I microepidemic of the Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease broke out when surgeons at a hospital (kill me, but I do not remember where exactly) operated on a person who had advanced neurological problems. They found damaged brain tissue, but the diagnosis was never made. Several years afterwards, patients with CJD started coming in. The final conslusion was that it was transmitted by the medical team who were re-using some of the equipment. The medical equipment was sterilized by autoclave, according to the procedure, but because prions (the objects responsible for CJD) are very stable proteins and contain no genetic material, sterilization at 120C couldn't destroy them. One thing you're right about though - CJD poses no real epidemiological threat at this point. I do agree with the general sentiment - there seems to be a lot of fear-mongering going on. Many people clearly want us to be afraid. The trouble is, they're not totally wrong! Many countries have developed bioweapons, since they are much cheaper and easier to hide than nuclear weapons, and certainly easier to develop. There are dozens of modified versions of the pneumonic plague with engineered resistances to many antibiotics. And let's remember that pneumonic plague is pretty much 100% lethal without adequate treatment. Furthermore, there is no real effective vaccine against it. No one was worried about the Russians using it against the US because the infection would likely spread worldwide before the epidemic would be recognized. But I doubt that the people we're facing now would care. So those who think that the threat of bioterrorism is a joke should probably re-evaluate their view of the world. With this in mind, everyone living in densely populated urban areas should have a plan that all the family members carry, with agreed-on meeting points in case communication is impossible, as well as detailed directions for getting out of the area by foot. This, along with a few gallons of water, some power bars, and a medical kit, are probably not a bad idea.

    6. Re:Paranoia by Davak · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm a doc but don't hold me to any details. :)

      I remember the story differently... I thought it was transplanted organs, but looking through the journals it looks like we are both right. Hmmm...

      Here is some quotes I can find:
      "Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease is one of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) that has been transmitted between humans and chimpanzees by electroencephalogram electrodes, previously 'sterilized' using ethanol and formaldehyde." -- J Hosp Infect. 2004 Sep;58(1):78-80

      It can be spread through blood transfusions...

      Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease following corneal transplantation Same article

      Davak

    7. Re:Paranoia by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but I'd like something like that just for the coolness factor.

    8. Re:Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you too, we hope.

    9. Re:Paranoia by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ahh...I see. Do you know what the extra features are? Was it simply doubling up the 2x4's in which case a tornado can still spear your whole family on a utility pole? Was it steel-reinforced concrete in which case it would have cost more than $3000? I've seen brick houses that were demolished by a tornado. The only way to be safe is to be underground. If a contractor is taking an extra $3000 from homebuilders and implying that you should stay above-ground in that room, I think some investigation is called for.

    10. Re:Paranoia by khrtt · · Score: 1

      So when the next hurricane/tornado comes, the only things left in the house will be my family and my servers. :)

      Mak that "...the only thing left OF the house...":-)

    11. Re:Paranoia by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless, of course, there is no option to have a basement and go underground. In that case I guess you just have to deal with the best you can get.

    12. Re:Paranoia by Cally · · Score: 1
      Like many geeks with issues :) I have been idly thinking about such things for many years - 25 or so. I've come to the conclusion that it is impossible to build a self-contained building (or even a subsection of a building) for less than a lot more money than anyone here has. Of course I'm talking about survivability against earthquakes - possible even in places like New England, fact fans! - large tidal waves of the sort caused by a 10,000y impactor over ocean, NBC, *AND* such things as marauding mobs of glowing irradiated zombie soldiers from the invading Sovs...

      My London friends' approach to planning for something unpleasant of 911 proportions ("hey, if it happens, it happens") starts to look less irrational.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    13. Re:Paranoia by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      If a contractor is taking an extra $3000 from homebuilders and implying that you should stay above-ground in that room, I think some investigation is called for.

      There are ways to make it. FEMA outlined guidelines for a saferoom. With these guidelines, a contractor could build you one which includes both above and below ground guidelines. Also you can purchase one prefabricated. Both call for reinforced concrete as primary building material.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    14. Re:Paranoia by stienman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Typical cheap safe rooms consist of simple 2x4 frame with a layer of 1/2 plywood, then a layer of 16 guage steel.

      A 2x4 at hurricane velocity might breach both the steel and plywood, but it would generally splinter and lose any and all useful energy by the time it gets through - and that's assuming it had enough energy to even make it to the room since it has to go throgh some regular walls/windows/siding/furniture/etc to get to the safe room.

      So yes, such a room can be built cheaply and still have more than adequate protection.

      See what FEMA has to say about safe room construction. In particular safe rooms cost between $3,000 and $5,000 depending on the type you build and where it is situated. It's much cheaper to build it when the house is built than later, so I can easily see a cost of $3,000 for an average safe room.

      -Adam

    15. Re:Paranoia by myc_lykaon · · Score: 1

      It reminds me of a TV series from years ago in the UK (I have a feeling it was Only Fools & Horses but...) they build a nuclear prrof shelter and it has all the filtration systems etc etc and at the end of the program the camera has a shot of the outside of the building, it zooms out showing the location of this refuge - on top of a 15 storey towerblock in London...

    16. Re:Paranoia by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The only way to be safe is to be underground.

      Unless there's a flood, and/or an earthquake...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    17. Re:Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably was a joke, but it does sounds like a plague shelter rather than a nuke shelter. People in Britain and Ireland are far more worried about plague/bioweapons than nuclear attack - we live in a much more crowded environment than most americans. In the event of a plague outbreak, being in a room with careful filtration near the top of a tower block sounds much safer than below ground with ebola-blood pouring in the air ducts from the piles of bodies topside.

    18. Re:Paranoia by Illserve · · Score: 3, Funny

      So when the next hurricane/tornado comes, the only things left in the house will be my family and my servers. :)

      You'd let your family into your server room?

      I mean, I know it's a hurricane and all but.... some things you just don't do.

    19. Re:Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note there is a distinct to be made between CJD and "New Variant" CJD which is what as previously been linked to Mad Cow Disease.

    20. Re:Paranoia by the_meager · · Score: 1

      Sans the family, right?

      --
      Speckpot?
    21. Re:Paranoia by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't help you when the nukes DO arrive to sterilize the massive Ebola outbreak before it spreads.

    22. Re:Paranoia by G-funk · · Score: 1

      What a load of crap. In Darwin, a city where cyclones (hurricanes that spin the other way for all you yankees) are a real threat, and most queenslander-style houses have an above-ground, storm proof room on the bottom level. They're just built with fuckoff-big bricks or cinder-blocks.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  3. I'm not sure.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But isn't Korea outside of Durango?

    Good thing that the shelter is nucular-fallout resistant, but his server obviously isn't Slashdot-resistant.

  4. Right. by Zebra_X · · Score: 4, Funny

    cleverly hidden 550 cubic foot root cellar is roomy enough to hang four elk quarters in and has large shelves for other food storage

    Yes, becuase my FIRST thought was to use the room for hanging elk meat.

    1. Re:Right. by gfunicus · · Score: 1

      Why not just say "one whole elk" instead of "four elk quarters"

      or,

      "Root cellar would make great quarters for a hanging elk."

      --
      It's better to regret something you have done that to regret something you haven't done.
  5. Who needs one... by flycrg · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...when you can just duck and cover?

    1. Re:Who needs one... by emcron · · Score: 0

      Actually, the duck and cover method usually gets you squished. Best bet is to hide near an object rather then under it, so you can be in the void created when objects fall on it, without you underneath.

    2. Re:Who needs one... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...when you can just duck and cover?

      Because, when Nuclear Armageddon comes, there may not be enough ducks for everyone.

    3. Re:Who needs one... by khrtt · · Score: 1

      heck, as long as there is enough covers... Eh, whatever.

    4. Re:Who needs one... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      When Armageddon arrives at least we'll be well dressed

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    5. Re:Who needs one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The appropriate followup would've been, "Quit hogging the covers!"

  6. Slashdot wasting no time preparing for apocalypse by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 5, Funny

    Only a few hours after a mushroom cloud was seen at the border of China and N. Korea, the people of Slashdot are looking for fallout shelters.

    Considering the batshit-crazy Kim Jong Il still runs N. Korea, maybe that's not such a bad idea after all.

  7. ./'d by RichM · · Score: 0

    Google cache.

  8. Pretty Neat by homerskid · · Score: 0

    Excessive, but neat nonetheless...

  9. Time for Teletubby Bye Bye by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blech! I expect to see LaLa jump out of that hole in the ground.

    1. Re:Time for Teletubby Bye Bye by thebudgie · · Score: 0

      Chuck Bush in there. "Bye bye, Dipsy"

  10. wow, is it 1998 again? by Modern+Fix · · Score: 0

    because thats how old this is.

  11. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Ultimate Secure Home

    Home front
    The artificial rock front blends in perfectly with the natural environment

    Some years ago, the owners of this property had a log hunting cabin in another part of Colorado. Beautiful, yes, but the wood construction posed numerous problems. Several "near-miss" incidents made the family realize how vulnerable the cabin was to any number of disasters and threats. A winter storm, which blew the front door open, might have caused the water pipes to freeze and break, flooding both the upper and lower levels, resulting in many thousands of dollars damage, had it not been discovered in time. A forest fire, which started when a tree fell on the above-ground power line leading to the cabin, came frighteningly close to the wood structure and to within just a few feet of the above-ground propane tanks. A hailstorm necessitated a new roof, a new paint job, and major repairs to the siding. The large front glass windows were spared from damage, but nevertheless were extremely vulnerable. And finally, when the cabin was broken into and many valuable antiques were stolen, the owners decided to look for a safer kind of structure for their retreat, and a better, more remote location.

    After spending 2 ½ years studying every kind of alternative home construction, everything from earthships made out of spare tires, to rammed-earth construction, to monolithic domes, they ultimately realized there was only one kind of construction that would afford them the kind of security they wanted: an earth home (made with Formwork's patented thin-shell concrete construction technique). The house they finally built is not just any earth home. It is what has come to be known in the industry as a "secure home." It is an unparalleled model of the ultimate secure home. Its many features will amaze you.

    While the term "secure home" is still relatively new to the general public, this unique segment of the home construction industry has, for the past decade, been growing steadily, albeit slowly. Presently, with the increased threat of major terrorist attacks, many more people than ever before are building secure homes. Also, more contractors and consultants have recently dedicated themselves to the concept of disaster-resistant and self-sufficient residences. It is only with a realistic understanding of the potential for terrorist attacks, and the magnitude of the problems they could cause, that one can truly recognize the value of a secure home.

    This patented steel-reinforced concrete earth sheltered structure, properly called a thin-shell dome, is built to withstand almost any natural or man-made disaster you can name. And that's not just an idle promise. These buildings have withstood tornadoes, hurricanes, and earthquakes - some measuring over 7.0 on the Richter scale - and in every case they have come away with no structural damage at all. Unlike monolithic domes, and all other types of home construction, only Formwork's concrete domes can be completely buried deep underground.

    The house has 2472 square feet, with an additional 800 square feet in the attached 24' x 36' underground garage. The main floor of the house consists of a large living room, two bedrooms, two baths, a kitchen, pantry, and laundry closet. Upstairs is a loft and two multi-purpose storage/sleeping rooms. The house currently has ten beds in seven different rooms. There is lots of additional space for other cots or bedrolls. A 22' long x 6' wide hallway leads to the garage. This hall is lined on one side with 18" deep shelf units, providing a considerable amount of quick-access storage. The other wall of this hall is a convenient place to store larger items, such as skis, bicycles, or a vacuum cleaner, that wouldn't fit on the shelves. Additionally, a large storage attic is found above the garage.

    The living room's high-domed ceiling gives the room an open, spacious feeling. A custom steel stairway leads from the loft to a cupola perched on top of the house. Light from the cupola gives the sa

    1. Re:Article text by Phleg · · Score: 1

      If you're going to post an ad, you might as well have just linked us.

      --
      No comment.
    2. Re:Article text by Phleg · · Score: 0

      I feel really stupid. I didn't realize your post was a copy of the article text. *smacks self*

      --
      No comment.
    3. Re:Article text by Fred_A · · Score: 3, Funny

      No .50 cal automated turrets ?

      You call that safe ??

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  12. Re:Slashdot wasting no time preparing for apocalyp by prisoner · · Score: 0

    I saw a show on some channel (maybe history) about that dude. It seems impossible that someone that kooky could actually be in charge of anything much more complicated than a milkshake machine.

  13. Paranoid to the extreme... by MacBorg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I mean, I've always liked the idea of having a bunker-house, but when it's this nuts, it's a little overboard. And the page-author is full of dung (vis. the follwing quote) "If the phone lines are ever down it will not be possible to get news via the internet." What century are they in?

    1. Re:Paranoid to the extreme... by Ba3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree on the Bunker house, the only problem i ever had with it, though, is the lack of natural light. Every time i see an underground house description (albeit normally they are not as crazy-nutjob as this one), I always wonder if they could use mirrors and fiber-optics to give the underground section of the house alot of natural light...

    2. Re:Paranoid to the extreme... by MacBorg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm a photographer and consequently I love natural light. That would be a real downer...

    3. Re:Paranoid to the extreme... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Well, you could just put in some windows.

      No, wait...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  14. It's all fine until... by obli · · Score: 0

    It's all fine until the water chip breaks, I tell you!

    1. Re:It's all fine until... by Clock+Nova · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's okay. Over in my secure home we have a great big box full of them. Must have been delivered by mistake...

      --
      There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
  15. waco teens + bunker by gomel · · Score: 0, Troll

    Secure my ass! "The Hole" was secure too, until some waco teeny threw away the key.
    remember, don't trust teenage girls, they are serial killaz. And have a private escape route.

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  16. Right by pirodude · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wow, a house underground! Never seen one of those before. That's so much better than a guy who tunneled a huge shelter under his house by himself. Oh yes.

  17. Overboard... by mOoZik · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really pity these people. They make the Slashdot tinhat-wearing clique look like a group of upstanding, optimistic netizens. Then again, where would these anti-disaster companies be if there weren't such nutjobs running around and confining their families and lives to isolated hobbit-like crapholes? I can see the need for a storm shelter, or a tornado shelter - but those make sense for those who live in vulnerable areas, but sheesh!

  18. Hidden location by mollymoo · · Score: 1

    These people even extend security to their website - ensuring the black text disappears into the surounding brown background. This is, I presume, to deter post-apocalyptic script-kiddies wishing to deface the site.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    1. Re:Hidden location by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What black text? I saw white text on a dark brownish background. Only one photo survived, though.

      Are you using a modern browser?

  19. I'm safer than that guy in his sad cave.. by jyristys · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..And live in the center of a city.

    In Finland. I for one welcome any scared slashdotters.

    1. Re:I'm safer than that guy in his sad cave.. by hawkeyeMI · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Believe me, the last thing you want is us Americans fleeing to Finland. I'd like to get to northern europe myself, but we'd bring our problems with us.

      --
      Error 404 - Sig Not Found
    2. Re:I'm safer than that guy in his sad cave.. by nusratt · · Score: 1

      "I for one welcome any scared slashdotters."

      I wish your offer were sincere.
      Seriously, how difficult would it be to be allowed to emigrate?
      I don't think the USA legal system (or foreign policy) will ever recover from 9/11, even if Bush loses the election.
      So I'm looking for a new country.

    3. Re:I'm safer than that guy in his sad cave.. by cubicleman · · Score: 1

      Finland is too cold in the winter for me... but I'd love to live in Italy..been there twice in the last year..

    4. Re:I'm safer than that guy in his sad cave.. by saldek · · Score: 1

      I'd reconsider your choice. If anything, the political situation in Italy is even more fucked up than that in America right now.

    5. Re:I'm safer than that guy in his sad cave.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I love Amsterdam... But that's just me ;-) However, I hope you're wrong. If bush loses then we have a chance, if he wins then we're in deep trouble :(

  20. Google cache by Peter_Pork · · Score: 4, Informative

    The "best shelter" site is already down. You can try Google cache

    1. Re:Google Cache by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      Geez.. Spamming from a fake Google cache...

      I don't know whether that's lame or to be impressed that someone actually thought of it..

  21. Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, but what is a scotus box?

    1. Re:Your sig by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Supreme Court of the United States, I think

    2. Re:Your sig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the question still stands:
      What is a scotus box?

  22. Oops by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Funny

    best shelter I've ever seen

    Unfortunately you are the only one who will ever see it.

  23. Google Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  24. I'd like to see some practical advice. . . by Nomihn0 · · Score: 1

    Like, as our Department of Homeland Security advised - sealing your windows and doors with duct tape and plastic sheeting. I mean, it's better to asphyxiate than glow green, right?

    1. Re:I'd like to see some practical advice. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long do you think it would take to die of asphyxiation?

      You don't think you'd have a better chance of surviving if you at least tried to wait until dust settled or gas dispersed, or antidotes etc. arrived?

    2. Re:I'd like to see some practical advice. . . by Nomihn0 · · Score: 1

      When you're talking on the time scale of a nuclear winter at ground zero, asphyxiation becomes more believable - especially in an apartment. Everyone's heard the urban legand about the guy who ate too many beans after sealing his house for winter. . .

  25. What's sadly ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Is that these "Hobbit holes", etc. really won't stand a chance in front of those demolition beams...

    They'd be better off trying to construct an electric Thumb.

  26. I like the Cold War house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not because I think it's especially necessary, but because it's just really neat. I mean, if people insist on consuming resources for silly things you gotta admit an underground radiation proof hidden house is a lot more interesting than these thirty million dollar celebrity mansions.

    This a) doesn't label you as a target for people looking for easy money and b) let's you live out those childhood fantasies of having a fort to retreat to (and to be honest, don't we all wish we could disappear into our own basement fort and vanish from the world once in a while?) Plus, there's always that 0.0000001 chance it might actually come in handy due to an event like it was designed for. Not a war probably, but suppose some terrorist sets off a nuclear bomb nearby? Not only would such a place be useful in ducking away from fallout, but unlike a full scale nuclear war a terrorist attack is worth surviving because there's still a world left over to come out to.

    1. Re:I like the Cold War house by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Except that: A terrorist attack would be near a populated area and one of the premises of this house is that it's not near one. So potentially one would have to drive to this house during an attack and that defeats the purpose. As you said yourself, a terrorist attack would be rather small and as such any house outside a populated area would be safe since all the utilities would still be up and running.
      This would be useful in a full scale nuclear war since the overall damage would be greater and contrary to Cold War propaganda the world would survive (well at least a decent portion). You spend a few years in such a house and wait for the potential radiation to settle.

    2. Re:I like the Cold War house by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      but suppose some terrorist sets off a nuclear bomb nearby?

      I've seen enough Twilight Zone episodes to know that when the fit hits the shan and a nuke goes off, it's not the nuke or even the terrorists that are the enemy... but ourselves!

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    3. Re:I like the Cold War house by kersch · · Score: 1

      i don't get one point of this "secure home stuff". most of my time (except at night) i'm just not at home, so i couldn't even reach my secure home in the case a terrorist blows a nuke nearby.

    4. Re:I like the Cold War house by Saeger · · Score: 1
      If "peak oil" is truth, then the people who've built these shelters will be sitting pretty assuming they've also got a couple-years supply of freeze-dried food, potable water, and an energy source.

      Seriously, my #1 fear is the economic collapse that will happen once the free ride of cheap oil is over, but I don't have a survival plan. My plan is essentially starvation suicide (I'll let the assholes and paranoids in the bunkers continue the human race while I sleep the long sleep.)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    5. Re:I like the Cold War house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My uncle used to work in a London investment bank that required him to work one day a week inside a nuclear shelter. His bank had a policy of keeping 10% of its employees out of arms way. These measures were taken after the financial center of London was hit by a series of IRA bombings.

      I suspect that after 9/11, some American banks and some American companies are going to take similar measures.

  27. Score... by EvilGoodGuy · · Score: 3, Funny

    If that doesn't scream either hobbit or smurf to you, then you are crazy. If only I weren't a poor college student.

    1. Re:Score... by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

      If that doesn't scream either hobbit or smurf to you, then you are crazy.

      Smurfs live in hollowed-out mushrooms.

      The kind of mushrooms the creator took before he came up with the concept I believe ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  28. the price... by bbdd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    frankly, i was surprised at the low price, currently offered at $ 495,000. maybe that's high for the area, but for everything you get, that seems like a pretty good deal.

  29. Bummer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Error 404 Not Found

    www.ultimatesecurehome.com: Too many open files

    Server CoralWebPrx/0.1 (See http://www.scs.cs.nyu.edu/coral/) at 139.91.70.71:8090

    1. Re:Bummer... by dejamatt · · Score: 1

      Ha, I'm not sure... but going to the Coral Cache of the home page, you get the ISP's slogan... looks like he got shut down, and now the cache has updated to include the shut-down version of the site... oh well, it worked earlier today.

  30. Ark2 School bus bunker by smartin · · Score: 1

    I've always liked this one.

    http://survivalring.org/nuclearsurvival/arktwo/i nd ex.htm

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  31. All apocalyptic inanity aside... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... that's pretty cool. Hobbit-hole, indeed! I say back down on the "imminent plague" bit and promote it to some environmentalist/Nature-loving types: doesn't have too big of a footprint, "energy-optimized"... you can imagine the little chipmunks and squirrels bounding about on top of the roof. Heck, you could make a small development.. and maybe make it a gated community to boot. Winding roads through wooded hills, no more evidence of human habitation than the driveway will provide...

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:All apocalyptic inanity aside... by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      You can imagine the little chipmunks and squirrels bounding about on top of the roof.

      I don't have to imagine it. A squirrel runs across my roof almost every morning and makes enough noise to wake me up, especially when he/she slips and tumbles down into my yard.

      My backyard is a heavily wooded "greenbelt". The squirrels frequently use my house as a thoroughfare (jumping from fence to roof to fence) because it's apparently easier than jumping from tree to tree.

  32. Re:Ark2 School bus bunker by smartin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    oop, try this

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  33. Dome Construction Info by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    Monolithic Dome Institute

    Includes lots and lots of pretty pictures. Check out the galleries of Homes, for example, among others.

    Of course, domes are exceptionally well suited for construction underground (link has lots of usefule tips)

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Dome Construction Info by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Includes lots and lots of pretty pictures.

      I didn't notice any exterior pictures of the Monolithic Dome Institute. I've driven by it many times (on I-35E between Waxahachie and Hillsboro, south of Dallas). I've always thought that is looked more like a low-rent trailer park than any kind of upscale community.

      Note that there is one home for sale at the site:

      http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/homes/italy-spec /index.html

      The original listing is dated 1/30/2004. It promises "We will have exterior photos soon". Nine months later, there are still none.

    2. Re:Dome Construction Info by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      ... looked more like a low-rent trailer park

      Exactly! Every time I pass it I think: "Looks like trailer people with too much free time obtained construction equipment and materials."

      I do like the building shaped like the Enterprise space ship.

  34. Coral Cache Here by aelbric · · Score: 1
    --
    nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
    1. Re:Coral Cache Here by goldfndr · · Score: 1

      I wasn't able to get this link working, but here's a freecache link. Hope I don't get kicked off; supposedly good up to 1GB.

      --
      Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
    2. Re:Coral Cache Here by aelbric · · Score: 1

      Strange, it was working a few minutes ago. Tried a few times in the last minute or so and it's a little spotty.

      Guess Coral is still working on being /. compatible.

      --
      nos laetus epulor qui would domito nos
  35. hobbit holes and missile silos in one story ? by bushboy · · Score: 1

    Wow, the authour sure mixes things up a bit.

    I'm trying to imagine missiles and microwaves in a Hobbit Hole, best thing I can think of is Bilbo's farts after drinking too much of the old Wine laid down by his father ...

    Hobbit Holes and High Tech - what would Frodo think ?

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  36. The new buzzword: terrorist by IKEA-Boy · · Score: 1

    While the term "secure home" is still relatively new to the general public, this unique segment of the home construction industry has, for the past decade, been growing steadily, albeit slowly. Presently, with the increased threat of major terrorist attacks, many more people than ever before are building secure homes. Also, more contractors and consultants have recently dedicated themselves to the concept of disaster-resistant and self-sufficient residences. It is only with a realistic understanding of the potential for terrorist attacks, and the magnitude of the problems they could cause, that one can truly recognize the value of a secure home.

    Oh come on, give me a break!

  37. This is a joke, right? by enilnomi · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hmm...chimney disguised as white birch; good thing no one will just look for the smoke!

    Great FUD though. Just when Slammin' Sammy-noia starts to fade, folks can begin worrying about ebola... in Colorado... in the winter!

    Please tell me the owner's illness isn't caused by living cooped up in a semi-sealed environment with no sunlight to work its magic on nasty organizms.

    You want to be absolutely secure? Take up permanent residence in a pine box, located about 6 feet under a headstone that reads "I'm over there -->....

    --
    education is no substitute for intelligence
  38. My survival planning: by JayBlalock · · Score: 1, Redundant

    A copy of the Bible, a copy of the Koran, tarot cards, a large pentacle, a feng shui chart, and several dozen pairs of underwear.

    --
    Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    1. Re:My survival planning: by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Kind of like Benny (?) in the Mummy - have one of each and hope that you can talk your way through when the time comes.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:My survival planning: by JayBlalock · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And if the catastrophe is so bad THAT won't help me, then I probably don't want to live through it.

      --
      Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
    3. Re:My survival planning: by legirons · · Score: 1

      "My survival planning: A copy of the Bible, a copy of the Koran, tarot cards, a large pentacle, a feng shui chart, and several dozen pairs of underwear."

      So how far have you got with Doom3?

    4. Re:My survival planning: by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Might still be useful on the other side.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  39. Nuclear Winter by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Sure, they have the solar panels and the propane tanks, and it they can survive a nuclear attack, but can they last through a nuclear winter?

  40. Remove the cause, not the consequence by Mr+Europe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I feel strongly that it would be more worthwhile to try to remove the cause for a nuclear holocaust than building shelters like this.

    But in US: act in the peace movement and youll probably be judged as a terrorist/communist or something antiamerican.

    1. Re:Remove the cause, not the consequence by cubicleman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      True...I fear the right wingers (esp. the fundie xtains) more than any terrorist threat. If they get their way, Democracy as we know it will be gone in the US, replaced by a fascist theocracy (which is what I think Ascroft secretly dreams of).. :)

    2. Re:Remove the cause, not the consequence by deacon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I feel strongly that it would be more worthwhile to try to remove the cause for a nuclear holocaust than building shelters like this.

      Well, that's nice. But while you go talk to Kim Ding Dong, what should we do in the meantime?

      Using your same logic, you don't believe in wearing a condom, because you believe it would be more worthwhile to eradicate all STDs?

      Don't wear a seatbelt because it would be more worthwhile to eliminate all auto accidents?

      Don't cook pork and chicken because you are working to eliminate all food borne pathogens?

      Great!

      When's your funeral?

      But in US: act in the peace movement and youll probably be judged as a terrorist/communist or something antiamerican

      Oh Yawn.

      Wake me up when Ashcroft pulls a Reno and serves up some Crispy Branch Davidians, shoots a mother carying a baby, or grabs a little boy who escaped from Cuba and ships him back.

    3. Re:Remove the cause, not the consequence by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1, Insightful
      If we got rid of our own nuclear weapons then we would actually have a leg to stand on, and world support, when we try to prevent others from having them.

      Our current policy of, "Do as I say, not as I do." has not worked very well.

      If we managed to have a worldwide ban rather than the weak non-proliferation treaty, then countries trying to develop nuclear weapons would be under threat of actions similar to Israel's bombing of Osirak to prevent Iraq gaining nuclear weapons; but backed by the UN and the world, rather than the economic slap on the wrist they get now.

    4. Re:Remove the cause, not the consequence by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1

      Well, that's nice. But while you go talk to Kim Ding Dong, what should we do in the meantime?

      The possibility of nuclear (or other) missile hitting US soil is really minimal. And USA is big. Even with ten large explosions most US citizens would be perfectly safe. The possibility to get any benefit of use ones own bomb shelter is zero (with several decimals).
      N-Korea does not have a working nuclear bomb, but it's probably developing it. They still don't have long range missile. And they have a lot of enemies. S-Korea and Japan are much nearer. Yet N-Korea has no real need of starting a real war, since Kim knows they will loose it. The country is struggling to stay alive.
      The risk of a terrorist action by a militant group calling them selves muslims, is bigger.
      Even that horrible possibility must be compared to the possibility of other risks. How many people get hurt yearly in construction work? Many, I guess. So, I presume that the risk of getting accidentally killed while building the bomb shelter is bigger than the risk the shelter is protecting from.

      Don't wear a seatbelt because it would be more worthwhile to eliminate all auto accidents?


      At this time of year, my biggest threat (when driving) is the elks. And the seat belt won't help much if you get 800 kgs meat on your face. Dropping the speed could prevent the accident. But for other risks I use the belt.

      Don't cook pork and chicken because you are working to eliminate all food borne pathogens?
      Actually I try to eat healthy food.

      Great!
      When's your funeral?

      ?? Sorry I cannot follow your meaning.

      Wake me up when Ashcroft pulls a Reno and serves up some Crispy Branch Davidians, shoots a mother carying a baby, or grabs a little boy who escaped from Cuba and ships him back.

      I thought we talked about whether it's sensible to build an own bomb shelter.

  41. A little paranoia goes a long way. by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
    From Ultimate Secure Home
    "The Big One" will be a genetically-engineered mutant of influenza and para-influenza viruses recombined with acute lymphocytic leukemia viruses. In other words, it will be a strain of the flu that spreads quick killing cancer by sneezing. One can only wonder what the results of Dark Winter would have been if it was done with such a killer virus, instead of just smallpox.
    A little paranoid? The only thing missing is Ned Flanders singing "We'll be safe inside our fortress when they come."
    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  42. Re:Slashdot wasting no time preparing for apocalyp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, was your post about North Korea or the U.S.? I couldn't tell.

  43. Survivalist by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    If you were one of those, yes it would be high on your list..

    Water, shelter, food.. in that order..

    Oh, and wifi access :)

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Survivalist by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      Actually shelter is typically more important then water. You can go a couple of days without water, the weather can kill you in hours/minutes.

  44. MIRROR by kmfdmk · · Score: 1, Informative

    The site was down so I thought I'd post a mirror from February.

    http://web.archive.org/web/20040214234814/http://w ww.ultimatesecurehome.com/secure_home.htm

    --
    If you're not paranoid, then you're not paying enough attention. - Unknown, Slashdot
  45. Screw Google Cache, Go Croal for PICTURES as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least pictures when they use relative instead of absolute URLs (like that Rio story yesterday)
    http://www.ultimatesecurehome.com.nyud.net:8090/se cure_home.htm
    Some of the pictures on the first page aren't working, but I'm hitting 404s on them now when I access it directly.

  46. security through obscurity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not Found
    The requested URL /secure_home.htm was not found on this server.

  47. What about actually getting there? by spiritgreywolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many of the sites I read about this talks about how state-of-the art protection can be out in the middle of nowhere, but _getting_ there during a national crisis is another.

    The worst kind of biological exposure is one that has a decent incubation period then nails you later in the blink of an eye.

    You're either already exposed getting there, in which case you bring it with you, or include pointers and tips on how to cover yourself by getting to the safehouse without being exposed - something missed by most pundits on this issue.

    When CNN screams, "We're being bio-attacked!", you get to jam yourself amongst the thralling masses trying to get away? Not good...

    --
    Never have a philosophy which supports a lack of courage
  48. North Korea scare just a ploy to sell bunkers by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Just like terrorists sometimes short sell airline stock. www.geocities.com/James_Sager_PA

  49. how about above ground by Riggs+E. · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For a truly awesome construction alternative, check out http://www.monolithic.com/gallery/homes/ Energy efficeint, structurely superior, and highly affordable. Not to mention one helluva conversation piece!

    --
    ------ Send your whines to /dev/null
    Frankly, I just don't care . . .
  50. Finally, a site to play proper LARP by empaler · · Score: 1

    Mmmm, Fallout LARP...
    (And *no*, I *don't* think hitting (or shooting) each other necessarily has anything to do with LARP).

  51. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 underrated Fallout reference?

  52. Great story from Danish medschool by empaler · · Score: 1

    One of my friends is a med student, and at one time they had an experiment wherein they made some antibiotica-resistant germs, can't remember which sort, though (it was a fairly common disease, flu or influenza or whatever).

    Their text book was very specific on the needed security during this experiment, how everything should be sterilized and how careful you had to be, because this could cause an epidemic.

    The experiment ended, and people went home.

    Then, two weeks later, two of her classmates (from Sweden, go figure) turned out to have not only *not* destroyed the bacteria, but they were *carrying them in their bags* in the small round glass containers!

    My friend (and several other co-students) tried for several minutes to convince these two Swedish girls that they should be very careful, and that they should destroy the bacteria, referring to the book wherein a page had been dedicated to warnings.
    "Nähä, they're harmless!"

    Stupid Swedes.

    They did eventually destroy them, luckily...

    1. Re:Great story from Danish medschool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Stupid Swedes."

      Being Swedish, I take no offense to that. I hope these two a) nevah get a degree, or failing that, b) at least only practice medicine in Danmark ;).

      First we gave you Ernst Hugo Järegård @ Rikshospitalet, now these two! Ah, if only there were more of us..

  53. I grew up north of Durango... by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What people have to remember is this:
    Denver, CO is set up to be the next Washington, D.C., in case the latter ever gets wiped out. Norad is based in Colorado Springs. Both of these potential targets are quite far to the northeast of Durango. The closest strategic targets I can think of are really Denver, Colorado Springs, Kirkland AFB in Albuquerque, and Los Alamos, White Sands, etc. in NM, and maybe some proving grounds and bases in Utah and Nevada. Durango is NOT a target, but it's kind of in the middle of these other, good targets. You'd expect to get a bit of fallout there from a large-scale attack. Having a fallout shelter is GOOD, I suppose, if you're worried about that.

    In addition, Durango is one of these "new Aspens", where college students hang out, there are a lot of older locals (ranchers, Navajo, people who showed up before the '70's, mainly), and so forth, but there are a LOT of VERY rich people around (WalMart heir rich; 4th richest in the US rich), who can afford these kind of eccentric houses (and seem to get off on living in this gorgeous place, and ruin the whole atmosphere at the same time because then no one else can afford to live there ).
    Finally, a lot of people hunt in Durango (and all over the mountain West). It's the kind of thing where you get a few days off in the fall to bag an elk or bear. So the guy's comment about elk hindquarters, although strange to a lot of people, are very common to people from the Rockies.

    1. Re:I grew up north of Durango... by cubicleman · · Score: 1

      Interesting..I hadn't thought about it that way (i.e. Denver being the next DC) but there are a lot of government offices/facilities here on the Front Range. (I lived in Colorado Springs 5 years, now in Denver the past two). We've got the Federal Center out in Lakewood..a bunch of government offices of some sort, I think.

    2. Re:I grew up north of Durango... by cjsnell · · Score: 1

      In addition, Durango is one of these "new Aspens", where college students hang out, there are a lot of older locals (ranchers, Navajo, people who showed up before the '70's, mainly), and so forth, but there are a LOT of VERY rich people around (WalMart heir rich; 4th richest in the US rich), who can afford these kind of eccentric houses (and seem to get off on living in this gorgeous place, and ruin the whole atmosphere at the same time because then no one else can afford to live there ).


      Yeah, you aren't kidding. There are definitely some people around there who might want this. My girlfriend and I just got back from a trip to the area. Here are some pictures of one such ranch. I'll leave it to the readers to figure out whose ranch this is, but here's a hint: look at the sign--he makes clothing. This guy owns an insanely large peice of some of the prettiest land in the Unitied States. He has a very expensive-looking fence around the property and, believe me, it goes on for miles. I heard a funny story about his fence...if you know about ranch fencing, you know that you build a wooden fence with the railings on the inside edge of the fence posts. This way, your cattle don't push the railings out. Well, supposedly, Mr. RL didn't like the way this looked so he had his people reverse the railings--at enormous expense--to make it look pretty.

      On a side note, there is a National Forest Access road through his property. We drove down it and I had to pee. To my girlfriend's horror, I got out and peed on his fence. Yes, now I can say that I have pissed on Mr. RL's fence. :)

  54. Why tell everyone? by gricholson75 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really, if I had a huge underground complex under my house, I wouldn't tell a soul. I mean, haven't they seen that episode of Twilight Zone.

  55. Why not less visible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm confused... the promo reads like it's a survival shelter, but the look of it is distinctly Hobbit-like. If it really was a survival shelter, why not go to MUCH greater lengths to make it hard to spot?

  56. Twilight Zone ? by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    Well, err... Wasn't the guy locked in his underground shelter, because noone knew he was in there ?
    Eventually they did try to get him back, but he was too scared to come out.

    In the end they simply locked the whole place up in a giant dome.
    Impressed me somewhat - proves one thing: even the best disaster planning doesn't take into account that the disaster is not that which you planned for :)

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Twilight Zone ? by gricholson75 · · Score: 1

      Umm... Wrong one. Sorry I don't no of the one you speak of. I was thinking of the one where the whole neighborhood breaks the guys door down on his shelter, arguing he should let other people in.

    2. Re:Twilight Zone ? by anubi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeh, I remember that one.

      Just two weeks ago, a similar thing happened to a young teenage girl two houses down from me.

      This is a little offtopic, but the principle is the same. Its what happens when you have something others can take.

      Her parents had to leave on business. It was her first time. Alone. She was frightened and lonely. She called *one* friend to come over and share the evening with her.

      No sooner than her friend got there, could she call a friend over too?

      Out comes the cellphone. Boop!Beep!Beepety-Boop! - Yakyakyak. Presto! Friend of a friend shows up. They have cellphones too.

      Soon the air is ripe with Boop-beepety-boop-yakyakyak. Chain reaction. Friends of friends of friends call yet more friends. Exponential unchecked population growth.

      For her, it was out of control. She couldn't leave the house, and had no idea what to do. She tried to evict them, but nobody would listen to her. Her house was now filled with people she did not know. First the neighbors thought there might be a problem, but when they saw so many people over there, they went back to bed just thinking she was just being socially noisy.

      I heard it too, but generally I am quite tolerant of someone having a "social" provided they don't make a habit of it, or cause me problems.

      It had gone past being noisy. People had not only brought their own liquor, but had also broken into and decimated anything of value in the house. It seemed no-one knew whose house it was, so it didn't matter anymore. Besides they were all drunk anyhow. The scene was reminiscent of the "old-West bar brawl".

      If it wasn't for some frustrated and sleepy neighbors calling the cops on this noisy party, it would have been only her parents arriving to break up the mess.

      As it turned out, the cops broke it up about 4AM, and the parents re-arrived about noon to a total shambles. All of us neighbors got a free tour of the demolition zone.

      Its quite a condundrum. Nobody knows who did what. So its hard to go after any particular individual for damages. And the insurance company is reticent to call it a covered event because the calamity was "invited".

      Just a word to the wise. Just because the law recognizes your property rights doesn't mean people will. If you have something like this - as much as you may hate to do this - even inviting one "friend" in could easily end in disaster.

      My own recipe for survival is to have a really good knowledge of how things work. So no matter what goes wrong, I can fix it. Even if I can not fight worth a damn, or have much financial strength, I feel if I can make myself valuable to those that do, it will be in their best interests that I survive, just as it is in my best interests my tools survive.

      Its times like this I feel I should have studied medicine instead of engineering. Everyone wants to make sure no-one harms their doctor!

      Having something just means you have the onus to defend it. Or its quickly not yours anymore.

      My greatest feeling of security is knowing that no matter what happens outside my realm, I know enough how to maintain my realm to keep the pumps running and the lights on. No matter what.

      Being able to continue to operate autonomously in the event of separation from any central "authority" is my main thrust for running either older or open source stuff, as in the event of any disruptive activity, access to any central rights licensing/permission granting authority is apt to be denied.

      Or worse yet, if the rights licensing/permission granting authority has been destroyed, I have no intention of having my data files suddenly rendered inaccessible and useless as those old Circuit City Divx disks suddenly became when they pulled their licensing server.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  57. Ofcourse.. by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ... the vhole idea ov a shelter, eh, is to be there before it happens, eh!, isn't that the pflan, eh!?

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Ofcourse.. by spiritgreywolf · · Score: 1

      Oh - ys mean if I saw CNN freakin' out about the issue whilst I was tossin' a few brewskis back in the shelter?

      But of course, my man... Hopefully that would be the way it would go down but with my luck? Doubtful. :-)

      --
      Never have a philosophy which supports a lack of courage
  58. Adding... by thrill12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... the more quickly-lethal a virus is, the less likely it is to spread far out.
    Ofcourse, the reverse also holds ground.
    Right now, the most lethal *virus* would still be HIV IMHO (IANAM):
    - long incubation time
    - terrible outcome without treatment

    And even with treatment, the toll on healthcare is quite big.
    The only thing making it less dangerous is that it is spread through very distinct ways, and not by air, I guess.

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  59. Two different episodes by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're thinking of "The Shelter," from the 3rd season of the original Twilight Zone.

    The other poster apparently has in mind "Shelter Skelter," from the new Twilight Zone series that aired in the 80's.

    In "The Shelter," everyone knew about the guy's shelter. In "Shelter Skelter," only the guy's wife and small children knew, plus a friend he happened to tell the day the accident happened (who he locked in with him). His wife didn't tell anyone because the guy had become such a survivalist nut that she felt the children were better off growing up without him.

    Both were great episodes.

    ~Philly

  60. Mod up... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

    Parent comment was shire class!

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  61. Seems like the perfect place... by mark-t · · Score: 1

    ... to run a grow-op.

    1. Re:Seems like the perfect place... by chevman · · Score: 1

      Seriously, why do you think this place is located near Durango? Not just a coincedence. I lived out there for 5 years while working for the Forest Service. Without getting too specific, I lived in a govt house in downtown Durango, which had a grow-op in the basement. For those still there, don't bother looking as the people involved have all split to distint locations, many of which are abroad. There are numerous sites out in the surrounding mountains where people have stuff like this house setup for the explicit purpose of growing and harvesting the kind.

  62. commercial products already out by poptones · · Score: 1
    Been out for some time. Everything from prisms attached to stovepipe-type light corridors to massive light fiber bundles.

    What I find ridiculous is the notion that this place is somehow "safe." It uses propane, and it's underground - just close up the ventilation shafts, cut the DC lines from the solar panels, and wait for the poor souls locked inside to come out... or to suffocate.

  63. Old adage, new perspective by Ikn · · Score: 4, Funny

    I for one do NOT welcome our new dominating Overlords, and will be hiding from them in my subterannean lair.

    --
    I know nothing
  64. I thought.... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    .... that the main problems were going to be the Zombies and the Damn Dirty Apes?

    At least, that's what they tell me at the NRA meeting.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  65. Another cool underground housing project by kndyer · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's another pretty cool design. I used to live near things guy. He consistently comes up with weird and wonderful things.
    http://www.williamlishman.com/underground.htm

    He also happens to be the "real" person behind the Fly Away Home story.
    http://www.canoe.ca/JamMoviesToronto96/sep8_flyawa y.html

  66. Re:Screw Google Cache, Go Croal for PICTURES as we by uberdave · · Score: 1

    Croal's slashdotted too.

  67. it's a free country, or so I'm told by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And that means that if you want to buy an underground shelter you have every right to do so, and fuck the people who insist that you should do other things with your money.

    It's *your* money, not the money of these socialist-wannabes. Screw them and the horse they rode in on.

    Besides, the idea of a fortified home seems pretty neat, even if relatively useless. If I had the money I'd certain do something along these lines. Talk about the ultimate in toys....

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    1. Re:it's a free country, or so I'm told by dave420 · · Score: 1

      And you're also free to get all your savings in a big pile and torch them - doesn't mean either are good ideas.

    2. Re:it's a free country, or so I'm told by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter a whit whether or not *you* think it's a good idea. It isn't *your* money. That's the only issue of any relevance.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  68. Saferoom plans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FEMA has plans for saferooms online:
    http://www.fema.gov/mit/saferoom/

    These were developed with the help of research done
    at Texas Tech, firing debris out of air cannons at
    walls made from various construction materials.

    Interesting stuff.

  69. Building materials by Sloosh13 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not a nasty, dirty, wet hole, filled with the ends of worms and an oozy smell, nor yet a dry, bare, sandy hole with nothing in it to sit down on or to eat: it was a hobbit-hole, and that means...uh...concrete.

  70. What are you afraid of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you yanks should watch Bowling for Columbine at least a few times!!!

  71. Re:Slashdot wasting no time preparing for apocalyp by C32 · · Score: 1

    That was three days ago champ.. Did you expect slashdot to post up-to-the-minute news?

  72. Men han er jo kradset af... by empaler · · Score: 1

    "Tetrapak... Ja!
    Volvo... Ja!
    Saab... Ja!
    Danmark... YNK!"

    Det var ikke helt kedeligt at se ;p
    ------

    Apart from that, I hope they themselves get themselves infected on their way home, preferably in the train back to Sweden... This would eliminate parts of our old territories, but still...

  73. safe rooms or tornado sheltyers... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...are quite commmon Nowadays in some areas. Basically you have a room -all six sides- that is totally built out of reinforced concrete around 1.5 feet thick. It has steel air vents and whatnot and the door is quite heavy steel Maybe, maybe not take a direct hit from an F-5 tornado, but most anything else in the form of big storms is survivable.

    It's more common than you might think, I've seen several in more upscale housing. I've also seen some dandy buried generators with large fuel tanks at homes to go along with the safe rooms. Most folks won't brag on it around the neighborhood, because they don't want to deal with folks who have done nothing to help themselves if an emergency hits, and who can blame them really, most people won't do a dang thing to help themselves in advance except buy jetskis and such like.

  74. Woah :p by Southpaw018 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Man, /. REALLY hammered this page. It's been completely taken offline. Check the Google cache by going to Google and entering "cache:www.ultimatesecurehome.com" in the search box, or go to The Internet Archive and use their Wayback Machine to pull up the page. Interesting stuff, though it takes some effort to pull up thanks to us geeks ^_^

    --
    ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
  75. If you say so by mnewton32 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...compare to your own disaster planning...

    Yes, of course. My own disaster planning...
    I must be missing out on something there. Perhaps because I'm not an American? I don't know, but the only disaster planning I do involves wondering how I'm going to explain my latest eBay purchase to my wife.

  76. Disguised Chimney by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    1. It won't be in operation all the time
    2. Proper combustion doesn't lead to much smoke, but you still need to vent the exhaust, as you need to get rid of the CO2. I'd be more worried about the access road.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Disguised Chimney by enilnomi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > 1. It won't be in operation all the time
      Granted; but see next
      > 2. Proper combustion doesn't lead to much smoke, but you still need to vent the exhaust, as you need to get rid of the CO2.
      In the "normal" wood-burning world, you've got a couple cords of hardwood seasoning outside and a thermometer on your stack, and it's reasonable to expect 90% of your burns will be low-creosote, low-smoke. But the heat will still be visible (and not just during the day -- take a look around a cold-weather neighborhood during a full moon, and notice all the racoons that gather on rooftops on or near the chimneys ;-). And there'll be a smoke trail on the snow; and there'll be the scent of combustion by-products in the air. And if they *ever* screw up and burn green wood or organic waste, they're gonna stand out like a tree in the desert. You're just not going to heat with wood and be anything close to secret.

      And the chimney itself means you're never going to be secure. Give me a gallon of ammonia, a couple of old towels, and a chimney -- I can drive you out of your semi-sealed house in no more than a few hours. It's even easier when the chimneytop is at ground level ;-) The possibilities are endless...grenade down the chimney; dynamite down the chimney; bio-agent down the chimney; John Tesh CDs beamed down the chimney; etc.

      Yeah, my reaction was broad...but I think people like this, who seem to genuinely think they're getting some kind of shelter against a breakdown-of-civilization by hiding away, are totally nuts. Security through obscurity DOES NOT WORK, right?

      Mind you, I've never experienced the end of the world (except in a Freudian sense ;-), but I've read enough science fiction to take a stab at this... if you want to survive, you'll band together with enough others to form a critical mass that can accomplish two basic tasks: food supply (by farming/hunting/gathering) and security (by defensive layering and communication and lottsa ammo). Your structures will be right out in plain sight, so that no one can approach them "by accident." You'll have big nasty signs telling any and all to stay away, and armed sentries/snipers to give the signs some teeth. Whatever electricity you can generate will be used for powering a telegraph, or HTs, or signal lights...any means of communicating that enable to outflank attackers and screw 'em good. Etc.

      > I'd be more worried about the access road.
      Exactly. Chimney, road, solar grid, animal tracks, worn paths...these people will be lucky to last a month if it all does truly go to hell.

      --
      education is no substitute for intelligence
  77. A few observations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, this is not your fault (unless you're on the XP development team), but the slide show that Windows builds SUCKS SHIT. Whose brilliant idea was it to make the "Next Image" link tiny, and bury it in a sidebar with an assload of other text, way up on the upper left? What's wrong with large, friendly navigation buttons just under the picture-- you know, where the eye will be naturally drawn to them? And what's with the useless info in the sidebar? Nobody's friends will EVER be looking at vacation pictures and go, "Gee, if only I know what focal length and exposure time was used when this photo was taken, I could enjoy it so much more. Oh, well."

    Second, would it have killed you to caption these, so I know what I'm looking at when it's not obvious? Like, what was up with this shot, where it looks like road was once passable but the rock has bulged out to block it?

    Third, the picture of the "Lamers" bus has soooooo been done. A a photo of you pissing on Ralph Lauren's fence would have been original and funny.

    Finally, it's illegal to smuggle Tic Tacs into the state of Colorado!

  78. Re:Slashdot wasting no time preparing for apocalyp by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

    I know, I made a mistake in saying that the incident occurred "a few hours ago," not a couple days ago.

    But to most Slashdotters, it's irrelevant. Most Slashdotters, like me, found out about the incident on /. -- so, the time to measure is the time between when we learn of the incident to when we see some response to that incident. It's kind of useless to measure the time prior to /.'s response, except as a measure of /.'s slowness in reporting some news...

  79. I'd like to have a house like this by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

    I'd like a house like this but not because it is so secure (these people seem paranoid to me). I'd like it for a couple of reasons. First, I think that a house designed like this is really capable of expressing the owner. In my case, I'd opt for a very non showy exterior (probably facing the enterances away from any visible road) and have a bright interior with lots of birch, white oak, and ash. Probably not many right angles either.

    Secondly, I think I'd like it because it uses technology to answer a few of the more vexing building problems. The one thing that struck me was the self-sealing nature of the matterials used to seal the house.

    I wouldn't mind the fact that it would protect me from some of the natural disasters. I probably wouldn't bury it deep enough to be a bomb shelter.

  80. Bet they forgot by ceallaigh · · Score: 1

    to test for Radon!

  81. Snug as a Bug by skooba · · Score: 1

    i've always kind of enjoyed the idea of living subterranean, snuggled-in all cozy and stuff underground. gives me a warm fuzzy. ever since i was a little kid. maybe it's because i grew up during the cold war, but maybe it predates that.

  82. now in a disclosed location by Thadddius_Brinks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it is on highway 550 just north of the NM border. ironically, the guy bought it to weather Y2k ;-) it is fairly impressive though, has two diesel generators with enough battery to last a good week without sun... in case you are worried about the end of the world but think it won't reach DGO. BTW, it would be no good for flooding as it is right next to a river in the mouth of a canyon and wouldn't be safe from roving banditos as it is right next to a major highway that connects western CO to ABQ NM. but then again, maybe he knows something we don't. TB

    1. Re:now in a disclosed location by Thadddius_Brinks · · Score: 1

      oh, sorry, that is one of the other bomb-proof houses outside of Durango. weird town if you ask me

  83. Freight Containers by duncanbojangles · · Score: 1

    I always wanted to dig myself a little shelter underground as a kid, but living in southern Louisian makes it difficult, due to the high water table. You can't dig a foot without hitting water!

    My plan now is that once I've saved up enough cash, I'll buy a couple of those waterproof shipping containers, the big metal ones seen on trains and ships. Then, I'll just drop those in the ground and add a hatch and adequate ventilation. Presto, home underground!

    If not a home, at least a cool computer and work room.

  84. Near misses. Heh. by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    So basically a snow storm _could_ _have_ frozen and broken the water pipes, but in practice it didn't. A fire could have reached the propane tanks, but it didn't. Etc.

    So let's not just bury the propane tanks, let's turn the whole house into a bunker. In fact, to make it completely idiotic, they bury the house, but the propane tanks are _still_ outside.

    Well, I don't know about you, but it seems to me like the whole damn life is essentially a series of almost-hits. E.g.:

    - Cars pass by within 3 ft of me when I'm on the sidewalk. One _could_ hit me, but in practice none never did.

    - The last round of flu at the office could have been some mutant alien genetically-engineered killer virus and killed us all, but in practice it wasn't.

    - Scary terrorists could blow up the building I live in, or the one I work in, but in practice it beats me why would they bother. There are more visible targets out there, you know.

    - The neighbour could turn out to secretly be a serial killer, but in practice they're all really old people. The mental image of one of them chasing me, hobbling on their frail legs and walking stick at maybe 1 MPH fails to be scary. Or realistic.

    Etc, etc, etc.

    Basically that's life. It's scary, it's unpredictable, and shit _could_ happen. Deal with it. Take reasonable precautions, but not this.

    You can't just bury yourself in a bunker and shut off the whole rest of the world. (Tempting as it might be at times for some of us introverts;) You can't just live the rest of your life in a bunker, on the off chance that some day disaster will strike without warning, and by Jove, you'll be underground when that happens.

    It wouldn't work either.

    If a virus epidemic broke out, how long could you live underground on four slabs of elk and 2000 gallons of propane. Then what? Then you go outside and catch the epidemic anyway. You're going to hunt what in that post-apocalypse world? Well, animals who probably carry the killer virus, if any survived it.

    Ditto for a nuclear apocalypse. Ok, you're safe underground for a few months, then what? Then you go out and brave the radiation and nuclear waste, that's what.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  85. F5 anyone? by Trackster · · Score: 1
    One word: F5

    From the FEMA link: F5 IncredibleStrong framed houses are lifted from foundations. Reinforced concrete structures are damaged. Automobile sized missiles become airborn. Trees are completely debrked.

    If one of these beasties is bearing down on you, underground is the only way to go.

  86. Jesus, Allah, Buddha.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I love you all!