Slashdot Mirror

Not even talking about the money spent, there is just no practical way for me to micro-pay for every site I go to

Check out Google Contributor. Of course it only micro-pays to sites that use Google's ad services, not all sites. But Google's ad services do cover a large chunk of the Internet. It's also still experimental.

"misogynistic overgeneralization"

Here is a Google Image search: anti-male. Since 1953, there has been in the U.S. a huge amount of hostility aimed toward men.

Read the books by Warren Farrell. For example, Why Men Earn More: The Startling Truth Behind the Pay Gap -- and What Women Can Do About It or The Myth of Male Power.

"hyper aggressive alpha type" and "tend to view all interpersonal interactions as a contest that they need to win"

I agree exactly with that evaluation. The way to solve the problem of people like that is to do what you do: Recognize the problem and avoid recommending someone like that.

Read this comment below: How will you weed out sociopaths, when a sociopath is at the helm?

Firstly, not all manhole covers are round. I've seen triangular ones in Nashua and Japan, and there are a lot of rectangular ones in Italy.

Secondly, the reason manhole covers are round generally is that during the industrial age the four major machining operations were casting, cutting, turning, and drilling, and since the covers had to be reasonably accurate while being mass produced they were made by turning (ie - on a lathe).

Thirdly, this is a variation of a "Fermi problem", after Enrico Fermi who famously used it to determine whether an interview candidate could think logically and make back-of-the-envelope questions. However, this question in particular is famous, available to anyone who could look it up on the internet. Along with the answer.

That 'kinda defeats the purpose, doesn't it?

Since the question and answer are so readily available, I have to assume that you, the interviewer didn't actually make up your own question. But it looks like *you* happen to enjoy these sorts of questions, and I'm sure that you had to answer your share of these when you interviewed for the company.

That being said, I'm also interviewing your company, to see if I actually want to work here. Since you like questions like this, here's one for you...

(NB: I don't like working for idiots.)

Firstly, not all manhole covers are round. I've seen triangular ones in Nashua and Japan, and there are a lot of rectangular ones in Italy.

Secondly, the reason manhole covers are round generally is that during the industrial age the four major machining operations were casting, cutting, turning, and drilling, and since the covers had to be reasonably accurate while being mass produced they were made by turning (ie - on a lathe).

Thirdly, this is a variation of a "Fermi problem", after Enrico Fermi who famously used it to determine whether an interview candidate could think logically and make back-of-the-envelope questions. However, this question in particular is famous, available to anyone who could look it up on the internet. Along with the answer.

That 'kinda defeats the purpose, doesn't it?

Since the question and answer are so readily available, I have to assume that you, the interviewer didn't actually make up your own question. But it looks like *you* happen to enjoy these sorts of questions, and I'm sure that you had to answer your share of these when you interviewed for the company.

That being said, I'm also interviewing your company, to see if I actually want to work here. Since you like questions like this, here's one for you...

(NB: I don't like working for idiots.)

"Even if you cannot admit the truth, the truth is that good security is accomplished by multiple overlapping layers." - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 08, 2015 @02:47PM (#49431731)

See subject & "Layered-Security"/"Defense-in-Depth" https://www.google.com/search?...

I wrote MOST of the guides for securing Windows using layered security!

( I was even PAID by winning a contest for writing it, that I didn't KNOW existed @ PCPitstop for it -> JANUARY 2008 "How to Secure Windows" http://www.pcpitstop.com/news/... so, how about you by comparison bigmouth? Nada, squat, zip, zilch, zero!)

What's that you said I quote from you above again?

---

"A good hosts file is just one layer. It is not a panacea" - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 08, 2015 @02:47PM (#49431731)

Show me WHERE I said hosts are a "panacea"? I NEVER ONCE HAVE (BarbaraHudson/TomHudson made that mistake too, same as yourself, & had to "eat his/her words" just like you!)

I've been security in computing before YOU were out of DIAPERS I strongly wager (& many other arenas in the art & science of computing as well, & DOING WELL @ it no less. That above? A single TINY sample!).

Lastly: You're MORE than welcome to prove the points I post on hosts are wrong - go for it (You won't, since it can't be done: 100's of trolls like you have tried, & always failed, or ran... lol!).

APK

P.S.=> You're obviously are 1 of the trolls I've obviously DUSTED before just as I have now due to your own stupidity & big mouth!

Now, you just KNOW I've just GOT to say it, don't you? AH, but of COURSE you do:

"EAT YOUR WORDS" flavored with the bitter taste of SELF-defeat, rammed down your throat by your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH too... lol!

THIS?

This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" & it always is vs. those like yourself - you do this to yourself, every single time you 'try me'... makes me laugh! apk

"Even if you cannot admit the truth, the truth is that good security is accomplished by multiple overlapping layers." - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 08, 2015 @02:47PM (#49431731)

See subject & "Layered-Security"/"Defense-in-Depth" https://www.google.com/search?...

Guess who wrote MOST of the top 10 there of those guides for securing Windows? Yours truly!

( I was even PAID for winning a contest for writing it, that I didn't KNOW existed @ PCPitstop for it (the Lord works in Mysterious ways - as "the Lord of HOSTS") -> JANUARY 2008 "How to Secure Windows" http://www.pcpitstop.com/news/... so, how about you by comparison, bigshot bigmouth? Nada, squat, zip, zilch, zero... right?)

So, what's that you said I quote from you above again?

---

"A good hosts file is just one layer. It is not a panacea" - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 08, 2015 @02:47PM (#49431731)

OK: Show me WHERE I said hosts are a "panacea" cure-all? I NEVER ONCE HAVE (BarbaraHudson/TomHudson made that mistake too, same as yourself, & had to "eat his/her words" just like you... lol!)

* FACT: I've been doing this side of computing in security before YOU were out of DIAPERS I strongly wager (& many other arenas in the art & science of computing as well, & DOING WELL @ it no less... that above? A single TINY sample!)

APK

P.S.=> You're truly a coward (as you won't post using your "registered 'luser'" name here & I'm certain you have one) - one I've obviously DUSTED before just as I have now due to your own stupidity & big mouth!

Now, you just KNOW I've just GOT to say it, don't you? AH, but of COURSE you do:

"EAT YOUR WORDS" flavored with the bitter taste of SELF-defeat, rammed down your throat by your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH too... lol!

THIS?

This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" & it always is vs. dolts with NO BALLS, such as yourself - you do this to yourself, every single time you 'try me'... makes me laugh! apk

"Even if you cannot admit the truth, the truth is that good security is accomplished by multiple overlapping layers." - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 08, 2015 @02:47PM (#49431731)

See subject & "Layered-Security"/"Defense-in-Depth" https://www.google.com/search?...

Guess who wrote MOST of the top 10 there of those guides for securing Windows? Yours truly!

(HECK - I was even PAID for winning a contest for writing it, that I didn't KNOW existed @ PCPitstop for it (the Lord works in Mysterious ways - especially "the Lord of HOSTS") -> JANUARY 2008 "How to Secure Windows" http://www.pcpitstop.com/news/... so, how about you by comparison, bigshot bigmouth? Nada, squat, zip, zilch, zero... right? RIGHT!)

* So, what's that you said I quoted from you above again?

APK

P.S.=> You're pitiful, and truly a coward (since you won't post using your "registered 'luser'" name here, & I am certain you have one) - one I've obviously DUSTED before, just as I have now, due to your own stupidity & big mouth... now, you just KNOW I've just GOT to say it, don't you? AH, but of COURSE you do:

"EAT YOUR WORDS" flavored with the bitter taste of SELF-defeat, rammed down your throat by your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH too... lol!

THIS? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" & it always is vs. dolts with NO BALLS, such as yourself - you do this to yourself, every single time you 'try me'... makes me laugh! apk

"Even if you cannot admit the truth, the truth is that good security is accomplished by multiple overlapping layers." - by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 08, 2015 @02:47PM (#49431731)

See subject & "Layered-Security"/"Defense-in-Depth" https://www.google.com/search?...

Guess who wrote MOST of the top 10 there of those guides for securing Windows? Yours truly!

(HECK - I was even PAID for winning a contest for writing it, that I didn't KNOW existed @ PCPitstop for it (the Lord works in Mysterious ways - especially "the Lord of HOSTS") -> JANUARY 2008 "How to Secure Windows" http://www.pcpitstop.com/news/... so, how about you by comparison, bigshot bigmouth? Nada, squat, zip, zilch, zero... right? RIGHT!)

* So, what's that you said I quoted from you above again?

APK

P.S.=> You're pitiful, and truly a coward (since you won't post using your "registered 'luser'" name here, & I am certain you have one) - one I've obviously DUSTED before, just as I have now, due to your own stupidity & big mouth... now, you just KNOW I've just GOT to say it, don't you? AH, but of COURSE you do:

"EAT YOUR WORDS" flavored with the bitter taste of SELF-defeat, rammed down your throat by your FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH too... lol!

THIS? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" & it always is vs. dolts with NO BALLS, such as yourself - you do this to yourself, every single time you 'try me'... makes me laugh! apk

You assume AGW is the cause for the current drought.

Previous to the California "dry spell", climatologists were saying that AGW would make Calif WETTER, not dryer.

Your claim is based on erroneous assumption.

GIGO.

Do you have citations for that? I did a search for agw predictions california rainfall and the first hit I got (and the only relevant one I saw) was an article about a 2005 paper predicting a very similar drought.

It's only one paper and I have no idea whether it was widely accepted, but if you asked me a few years ago what AGW meant for California rainfall my very limited understanding would have lead me to say less rainfall.

In the preface to the book "What Color is Your Parachute" (2003,2009 editions) the author addresses this, cites some other grammar analysis authors, which also agree. He points out that this is again common usage in the current vernacular (just as it has been in previous periods in history).
View the page here: https://books.google.com/books...

Ted Danson may have, but who the fuck does he speak for? no one. Are you just pulling out things random people have said and now your claiming that they are experts? And that they speak for the scientific community?

In Ted Danson's case, he testified before Congress on behalf of an environmental group, so no, I'm not just pulling out things "random people" have said. These are people who are trying to affect socioeconomic policies by making wild statements they claim are backed by science.

The Heartbleed logo is the first logo designed in almost 50 years that has no need for a drop shadow.

http://google.com/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/

I'll just leave this here. https://www.google.com/url?sa=...

There's already a lot of those: https://www.google.com/search?...

In KYLLO v. UNITED STATES , the Supreme Court held in 2001 that:

Where, as here, the Government uses a device that is not in general public use, to explore details of the home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion, the surveillance is a "search" and is presumptively unreasonable without a warrant.

in determining that use of a thermal imaging device whose output was used to establish cause for a search warrant was, itself, a search that required a warrant.

By making intrusive surveillance devices available inexpensively (perhaps by showing hobbyists how to build their own), such devices could move (as planes have) into "general public use" and then be usable by police without a warrant to surveil areas normally off-limits to them without a warrant.

Almost makes it sound like they won't need a search warrant anymore, as long as enough people build these things and put them into general use.

The problem is science.

No space station? Well that's because people wrote those books, and books on moon colonies or terraforming Mars when they weren't really aware of how much effort it took just to get rockets off the ground. People thought going to Mars would be as easy as driving your car to Vegas, and over time people slowly became aware that it wasn't, and science wouldn't create any magical thing that would make it so.

I think you may be confusing science and engineering/economics. "Rocket science" has been around 202 years according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... It's not as expensive to get into orbit as you think. If you just consider the energy it's around $2 a kg to GEO.

By combining Reaction Engines' Skylon and a method the microwave guru Bill Brown proposed, I think it is possible to get the cost down to less than $200/kg to GEO at a flight rate commensurate with the cargo requirements of a power satellite project. At that transport cost, energy from space can undercut electrical energy from coal--if you can get the mass of a 5 GW power satellite under 32,500 tons. Preprint here https://drive.google.com/file/... The one on getting the mass of a thermal power satellite down to where the project makes sense will be out in a few weeks.

But mostly you are right. I remember one place where Heinlein mentioned that "he and Ginny spent three solid days calculating on big sheets of butcher paper some of the Hohmann transfer orbits he was writing about . . ." Nowadays, you can run this off in half an hour with Excel (half hour to write, less than a ms to run) but how many of the current crop of writers would do even that?

In KYLLO v. UNITED STATES , the Supreme Court held in 2001 that:

Where, as here, the Government uses a device that is not in general public use, to explore details of the home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion, the surveillance is a "search" and is presumptively unreasonable without a warrant.

in determining that use of a thermal imaging device whose output was used to establish cause for a search warrant was, itself, a search that required a warrant.

By making intrusive surveillance devices available inexpensively (perhaps by showing hobbyists how to build their own), such devices could move (as planes have) into "general public use" and then be usable by police without a warrant to surveil areas normally off-limits to them without a warrant.

Get Linus to make the request and force the copyright issue. What are they going to say? No?
He owns their equipment now.

The android app called dnset allows Turkish people to overcome the censorship. It changes the DNS server of android mobile phone without requiring root permissions. A paper about the censorship of 2014 is available here: https://www.researchgate.net/p... The app can be downloaded from the play store: https://play.google.com/store/...

Either: https://www.atlassian.com/soft...
or: https://code.google.com/p/tort...

But I don't like SCMs that integrate into the Explorer ... to confusing and error prone IMHO.

Just worked an hour on my sisters Windows 8 Explorer/Internet Explorer and stuff: worst software/UI experience ever ... who actually is using such a system? Masochists?

Just try the default DNS, and if it fails use another server.

Which would require the application to hardcode the IP address of a recursive DNSSEC server. Who would operate this server? Would 8.8.4.4 and 8.8.8.8 be appropriate, or ought this to be the job of the publisher of each individual application?

The acquifers recharge and walla you have prime Beach front property again.. just like in that 1979 Superman movie with Gene Hackman.

Oh good god almighty...
For those who are concerned about proper usage and not giving nosebleeds to pedants everywhere, I believe the word you are looking for is voila . It's from the French, hence pronounced with a ridiculous accent.
The more you know...

CBS has an app that would do the chirp when you did the "communicator flip"

https://play.google.com/store/...

Your first line is wrong, wrong, very wrong. XOR is unbreakable if used with a proper one-time pad, but no output of a key stretching algorithm is going to meet that bar. The absolutely essential characteristic of a one-time pad is that every value it could contain is equally likely.

What you're trying to describe is more like how stream ciphers, such as RC4 work: you supply a key, and the cipher stretches that key into a bitstream of whatever length you require. XOR that bitstream with the plaintext to get ciphertext, or with the ciphertext to get plaintext. RC4 is simple, it's fast, it's been used for decades in real-world cryptography, and it is *broken*. It's not even a matter of being *theoretically* breakable; people have actually been able to decrypt stretches of RC4-encrypted text without knowing (or brute-forcing, that being completely impractical) the 128-bit key.

The problem is that not every bit of the keystream is equally likely to be 0 or 1. There are biases in the cipher, such that no matter the key, you can predict the likelihood that each bit of the ciphertext was flipped. Combine enough ciphertexts of the same plaintext (this would be impractical-bordering-impossible for a human, but is easy for a computer) and you (or rather, your software) can look at all the ciphertexts, notice certain bits are slightly more likely to be 0 or 1 (this would never happen with a proper one-time pad), and based on your knowledge of the cipher's biases, determine whether those bits were originally 0 or 1. Finding those biases is expensive initially, but they are now known for enough bytes that it's usually possible (assuming enough samples of identical plaintexts with different keys*) to get things like somebody's HTTPS-protected cookies.

* A relatively easy way to get all those samples is to inject a script into somebody's HTTP response - say, for http://slashdot.org/ - which constantly does nothing but request the same HTTPS URL (such as https://mail.google.com/ and does nothing with the response. Collect the requests (not the responses, since those might vary) and eventually you can figure out the plaintext (including the user's session token) with a high degree of likelihood.

looks like the company has quite a few such "protection" apps deployed on the play store and they even use their stock ticker symbol in the developer name, lol.
https://play.google.com/store/...

NYSE:NQ feeling slashdotted in 3..2..1... now... https://finance.google.com/?q=...

looks like the company has quite a few such "protection" apps deployed on the play store and they even use their stock ticker symbol in the developer name, lol.
https://play.google.com/store/...

NYSE:NQ feeling slashdotted in 3..2..1... now... https://finance.google.com/?q=...

Google them. They're a publicly traded company. NQ Mobile

Still not resizable horizontally, though. Those are text-oriented programs and don't know a thing about windows and window management features like resizing.

You can use mintty instead, which does know about resizing.

See Kingston Coal Ash Pond for example.

I'm sorry you're so stubborn, ignorant, and nationalistic to believe that a mere 1% of the ash generated from burning coal couldn't possibly escape into the atmosphere in the Fatherland. Unless you've got alien-level technology, your German scrubbers are bound by the same physics as those in the US - ~99% efficient is the maximum you can get.

http://www.epa.gov/radiation/t... - 99% efficient

http://www.britannica.com/EBch... - 90% - 99% efficient

http://www.gdnash.com/rocktron... = 99% efficient

Table 3 in this document directly compares particulate matter emission regulations in the US and Germany - as you can see, the average PM emissions for German plants is 50 mg/Nm^3 as opposed to 18.3 mg/Nm^3 for all new large plants in the US as mentioned in this document.

For us having a simple design and a simple code base is a lot more important than trying to accommodate for distros that want to combine everything with everything else. I understand that that is what matters to many Debian people, but it's admittedly not a priority for us.

And this one:

I have no plans porting it to other kernels, and I will not merge any such patches........Quite frankly, I'd like to question [cross-platform compatibility]. In the light of GNOME OS I think we need to ask ourselves the question if we do ourselves any good if we continue to support all kinds of kernels that simply cannot keep up with Linux anymore.

Incidentally, Wayland has picked up some dependencies on systemd, I didn't realize that.

So? Go out to Road America in Elkhart Lake, WI and you can see the crazies on their motorcycles at similar distances as well as other vehicles depending on the event (indy, various SCCA events. GT events, etc).

That'll solve the problem, and really it would be an improvement for the state.

Green would be OK, however "burnt orange makes me puke".

Not going to happen. Google said no to DNSSEC/DANE. Mozilla pretty much did as well. At the moment we're stuck with the HTTPS key pinning header which doesn't protect first visits.

Check out the actual bump.

Anecdotal of course, but it sure seems like the announcement caused a massive spike in trading.

Also note that TSLA is up $4 over yesterday's close, so that's a total of 3%.

This is not nothing, given the scope of effort they made (a simple blog post and twitter announcement).

Here is a link to the latest Mozilla statement on the mailinglist/newsgroup:
https://groups.google.com/d/ms...

Let me help.

So you prefer PVC for your water pipes? That tends to grow nasty stuff in it, and not be great at dealing with temperature shifts. Or cast iron, which rusts? Steel?

Copper is used in MANY systems, and almost universally in plumbing, the world over. US, UK, Mexico and Canada all use it as their primary potable water piping solution, and even the EU uses it commonly: https://books.google.com/books... water pipe european union&f=false

Maury, if you want to attack a kind of renewable energy, you should pick a better way. It's cost rather than any other factor that makes the difference.

If you use levelized cost of electric power for electrical from space it turns out that the cost depends entirely on the capital investment since there is no fuel.

Capital investment depends on the cost to buy the parts and the shipping to get them to GEO. Cost of parts, including the rectenna is about $1100 per kW. This is based on steam turbines, which are about three times as efficient as current low cost PV. Analysis of the mass indicates they will mass about 6.5 kg/kW. That includes the concentrators, boilers, turbines, condenser/radiators, the transmitter and a frame to hold it all together.

This paper (preprint, but it's been published) https://drive.google.com/file/... shows how a substantial parts flow to GEO would cost less than $200/kg. That makes the whole thing come in at less than $2400/kW or 3 cents per kWh.

Coal costs 4 cents per kWh, so power from space (if this analysis is correct) would undercut coal.

Fastest this could happen is 2023 assuming Reaction Engines delivers as promised in 2021. On the kind of fast growth you would expect from something making a very high level of profit, power from space would completely displace more expensive fossil fuels by the early 2030s.

If you think that's a good idea, you might want to analyze power satellites from the end point of producing power for less than electricity from coal.

Jurgen Schmidt of Heise Security says: "Since Facebook buttons are virtually omnipresent, Facebook can get a complete list of all the websites that I visit and link it to my person..."

Facebook Blocker

JavaScript was originally just going to control some minor browser behavior; moving windows around, etc. So it didn't need to be efficient or well thought out. Then it got extended and overused so much that it slowed down computers so noticeably that it caught the attention of everyone.

Actually, web technologies were horrible, with every major browser adding its own incompatible extensions and the W3C barricaded in an ivory tower, and Microsoft extended their version of Javascript to support the insane uses of Internet Explorer as the Windows Update control panel and stuff like that. Then Microsoft won the browser wars, and web technology stagnated, until some people figured out that "the XML HTTP thing" could be used to create web applications that communicated in objects instead of reloading all the time, and Jesse Garrett gave it the name Ajax. Then there was a business use for Javascript to be fast.

Then Douglas Crockford discovered that Javascript has good parts, the WhatWG started doing HTML5, and now many web sites don't show anything at all without Javascript, but at least you can compile a sane language into Javascript.

Yeah nice try Mozilla shill. How much are they paying you to say that? Anyone who has used Firefox knows it is utter shit compared to Chrome.

I may be a bigot in your mind, but you are illiterate in mine.

Quote from my post above that is relevant:

Civil union is the state sponsored joining, and should be the proper avenue for the state to allow something that religion indicates is wrong. If someone feels that a homosexual couple should share in the benefits a heterosexual relationship enjoys, they should move for equal benefits for the two, not move to change the definition of marriage.

except you keep insisting religion is the only institution allowed to define what marriage is, when marriage did not even start with religion to begin with. the claim that organized religions should be the only ones to define what marriage is is ludicrous.

Unfortunately, Indian schools still require learning to code with Turbo C++, which is ancient and incompatible with any modern open source code.

Sad but true: http://google.com/search?q=Ind...

Conservatives need to come to the table with solutions

You need problems first in order to have solutions. For example, this article is about how 1.5 C rise in temperature is supposed to be bad with all sorts of "negative impacts", but there's no actual evidence for the claim. Providing solutions to non-problems doesn't help anyone. Nor do we have a sane plan for keeping temperature rise below 1.5 C. Note that you won't get the US, China, Russia, or OPEC on board.

Already:-
world temp has risen 0.7C over past 10 years
we have lost permafrost that has led to the draining of 10,000 lakes worldwide
each year an extra 10,000 sq km of ocean is created from melting arctic ice sheet
in Sept 2005 an area of the arctic ice sheet the size of Alaska vanished.
In 2004 the first ever hurricane in Brazil in the southern hemisphere,
Hurrcane Vince landed in Huelve, Spain, the first tropical cyclone ever recorded in Europe.
http://books.google.com/books/...

"There is medium confidence that ~20–30% of known plant and animal species are likely to be at increased risk of extinction if increases in global average temperature exceed 1.5 C to 2.5 C over 1980–1999... increases in drought, heat waves, and floods are projected in many regions and would have adverse impacts, including increased water stress, wildfire frequency, and flood risks (starting at less than 1 C of additional warming above 1990 levels) and adverse health effects (slightly above 1 C)... climate change over the next century is likely to adversely affect hundreds of millions of people through increased coastal flooding after a further 2 C warming from 1990 levels; reductions in water supplies (0.4 to 1.7 billion people affected with less than a 1 C warming from 1990 levels); and increased health impacts (that are already being observed"
http://www.pnas.org/content/106/11/4133.full.pdf+html

When I posted the link it was good

https://www.google.com/search?...

Anyway here you go.

I am not a libertarian, but I know more than enough about their cause and people who are libertarians, to understand your comment just marks you as an ignorant bigot.

Lets Hypothetically ?

https://news.google.com/newspa...

That would be like the "Hypothetically " ice free north pole by 2000 ?

Actually, the full quote is "...and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean..." (emphasis mine). The source of the claim, Berndt Balchen certainly had an interesting biography, but neither was he trained as a scientist, nor what the statement in a scientific publication.

Lets Hypothetically ?

https://news.google.com/newspa...

That would be like the "Hypothetically " ice free north pole by 2000 ?

Or would that be the same way the UN spoke of "Hypothetical" climate refugees

http://www.spiegel.de/internat...

It's a result of billions of humans living on the planet and their activities and industry. Short of ridding the world of the majority of those people global warming will continue to climb

Real shame people don't take genocide well.

There can only be one explanation for a phenomenon, and it can never have anything to do with climate change. So obviously sea level rise has nothing to do with it. Because, LIBERALS!

There can only be one explanation for a phenomenon, and it is always everything to do with climate change. So obviously falling sea levels has nothing to do with it. Because, CONSERVATIVES!

See how stupid that sounds when the shoe's on the other foot?

There can only be one explanation for a phenomenon, and it can never have anything to do with climate change. So obviously sea level rise has nothing to do with it. Because, LIBERALS!