Slashdot Mirror

If you neglect your civil rights,they will be removed by the Cheney-Rumsfeld regime.

Remember, regime change begins at home

Thanks and have an Ashcroft-free week!!
W00t

Have you found a new undisclosed secure location to
escape impeachment?

Looking forward to seeing you behind bars,
W00t

Get Your War On 21

>You haven't shown a single lie.

You haven't been reading.

"False" has been changed to "Dubious" to be politically correct for the Cheney-Rumsfeld regime.

>He improved the country's reputation.

Here's an improved reputation

>So what if he got a bunch of hatemongers a little angrier.

You give little credit to our patriotic politicians

Very truly yours,
W00t

Get Your War On 19

You have no rights. This is the United States of
America controlled by the Cheney-Rumsfeld
regime

Thank you and have an Ashcroft-free day,
W00t

Get Your War On 12

Would you please consider news that
seriously affects residents of the
United States of America as the current fascists
continue to restrict our freedoms.

Thank you and have an Ashcroft-free day,
W00t


Get Your War On 23

Dear Fellow Patriots:

Read all about your fearless loser
here

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On 12

• LBJ's war on poverty
• Nixon's war on cancer
• Reagan's war on drugs
• W's war on terrorism

Seems having a "War on" something makes it omnipresent and ustoppable.

-dameron

Read about the biometrics for visas and passports
at Jane's

Expect implanted RFID tags next from the
Homeland

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On 25

Rewriting the constitution: It's not just for legislators anymore!

ARTICLE IV OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be received.

Recent decisions handed down by the United States Supreme Court have held that police can:

Search you home upon the consent of someone who has no authority to give same. (Illinois vs. Rodriquez)

May search every room in your home including the basement and attic without a warrant if they are arresting you in a private residence. Evidence seized may be used in court. (Maryland vs. Bule)

Hold you under arrest and incarcerate you for 48 hours or longer without charging you for a crime. (County of Riverside vs. McLaughlin)

May question you and elicit confessions from you while you are incarcerated without identifying themselves as police officers or advising you of your rights. (Illinois vs. Perkins)

Subject motorists to mandatory sobriety tests without any indication that they have been drinking, or their driving is impaired. (Michigan State Police vs. Sitz)

Stop your car based upon an "anonymous tip" which the court described as "completely lacking in the necessary indicia of reliability." (Alabama vs. White)

May stop, detain and question you anytime, anywhere and for any reason even if there is no evidence or indication of any illegality or wrong doing. (Orange County vs. Lopez)

May record and use as evidence telephone calls made or received from a cordless phone without a warrant and without violating your right to privacy. (Tyler vs. Berodt)

The thief-in-chief has stolen this country

Cheers,
W00t

I like chocolate

Enjoy,
W00t

Get Your War On 24

courtesy of Steal This Country

Enjoy,
W00t

Get Your War On 24

funny stuff!

As I was reading your post I Imagined it as a Get your war ON! comic

But the only flaw with your scenario is that the WMD-searcher needs the economy to get better, this IBM thing is slamming the DOW, which in turn hurts the economy and investor confidence

bin Laden discovered as chef in Pentagon 2-1

President Cheney resigns by November 2004 6-1

Bush marries Tony Blair 2-5

Saddam Hussein discovered in President Cheney's bunker 1-2

G. W. Bush impeached by Sept. 2004 3-1

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On

DARPA to monitor how we feel :

Impeach Bush et al.

That's how I feel.

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your Fake War On

Are arrested and delivered to the :
International War Crimes Tribunal

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On

Robots solder and repair humans.

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On 24

1. Where is Osama bin Laden?

2. Where is Saddam Hussein?

3. Where is President-Vice Cheney?

4. Where are Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction"?

Thanks in advance and cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On 24

1. Where is Osama bin Laden?

2. Where is Saddam Hussein?

3. Where is President-Vice Cheney?

4. Where is John Katz?

Thanks and have an LSD-inspired week,
W00t

Get Your War On

Haliburton WILL manage the Iraq oil industry. Told you so!

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On

Good news for the Moron-In-Command

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On 23

You have no rights. This is the United States of Amerika.

Very truly yours,

Richard B. Cheney

Get Your War On 23

The U.S. has biological, chemical and nuclear weapons. All others have WMD.

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On 23

Is that North American, South American, Central
American, or are these bumper sticker owners so
illiterate and innumerate that they are unable to
identify The United States of America on a map of the world?

Thanks in advance,
W00t

Get Your War On 23

Read Get Your War On 23 to find out.

Cheers,
W00t

Now, if only I can figure out of what country I am a citizen!!!

Yyyyyyyyyyyyiiiiiiiiiipppppppppeeeeeeeeeee!!!!

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On

1. Where is Osama bin Laden?

2. Where is Saddam Hussein?

3. Where is President-Vice Richard B. Cheney?

4. Where are Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction"?

Cheers,
W00t
Get Your War On

1. Where is Osama bin Laden?

2. Where is Saddam Hussein?

3. Where is President-Vice Richard B. Cheney?

4. Where are Iraq's "weapons of mass destruction"?

Cheers,

W00t
Get Your War On

Read about how the U.S. government bribed Saddam and the Baath party for their phony war.

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On

Get Your War On

Before declaring U.S. in violation of U.N. Security Council
resolutions

CANADIANS TO LEAD WEAPONS INSPECTION TEAM INTO USA

November 21, 2002

(Toronto) - A coalition of Canadian peace groups today
announced their intention to send an international team of
volunteer weapons inspectors into the United States later
this winter. The coalition, Rooting Out Evil, are recruiting
inspectors through their newly launched website,
Routing Out Evil
.
"Our action has been inspired by none other than George W.
Bush," said Christy Ferguson, a spokesperson for the group.
"The Bush administration has repeatedly declared that the
most dangerous rogue nations are those that:
1) have massive stockpiles of chemical, biological, andnuclear weapons;
2) ignore due process at the United Nations;
3) refuse to sign and honour international treaties; and
4) have come to power through illegitimate means.
"On the basis of President Bush's guidelines, it is clear
that the current U.S. administration poses a great threat to
global security," said Ferguson. "We're following Bush's
lead and demanding that the U.S. grant our inspectors
immediate and unfettered access to any site in the country -
including all presidential compounds - so that we can
identify the weapons of mass destruction in this rogue
state," added David Langille.
Visitors to Rooting Out Evil's website are invited to sign
on as honorary members of the weapons inspection team.
Honorary inspectors can participate in the action, or they
can simply lend the support of their name as they would on a
petition. The actual inspection team that crosses the
border will be comprised of prominent individuals from
Canada and other countries.
The Rooting Out Evil coalition includes Greenpeace Canada,
the Centre for Social Justice, and the Toronto Committee
Against War and Sanctions on Iraq, and is supported by
American groups such as the National Network to End the War
Against Iraq, Global Exchange and the US section of the
Women's International League for Peace and Freedom. They
oppose the development, storage, and use of weapons of mass
destruction by any state.--For information: David Langille or Christy Ferguson
info@rootingoutevil.org David Langille, Director of Public Affairs
CENTRE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE489 College Street, Suite 303Toronto, Ontario M6G 1A5
Tel: 416-927-0777 x225 Fax: 416-927-7771 Toll free: 1-888-803-8881
Email: langille@socialjustice.org Website: http://www.socialjustice.org

Not interested in a war against Iraq?

Become a Weapons Inspector

Usama bin Laden alive and well working
at the CIA 3-1

Saddam Hussein alive and well in
Dick Cheney's bunker 2-5

Jon Katz down and out (and trying
to score coke) in Silicon Valley
for another uninspiring phoney story
that he will post on Slashdot when
Dick Cheney seeks asylum in France 5-1

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On

Where is Osama bin Laden?

Where is Saddam Hussein?

Where is Jon Katz?

Where is President-Vice Cheney?

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your U.S. Occupation (for Oil) Of Iraq On

Something Awful's Guide To Surviving War In Iraq

Whitehouse.org

Get Your War On

Saddam Hussein's LiveJournal

(two of the above recently mentioned on the very article that's currently headlining Satanosphere).

Get your war on is an instant classic.

Get your war on

My new fighting technique is unstoppable "Get your war on," page 4:

"Bah! We're living in the 21st Century, and people still wage war to impress invisible superheroes who live in outer space! I thought we'd all be chilling out in solar-powered flying cars by now!"

First U.S. President To Be Convicted Of DUI

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War On

Shock and awe this, you moron

Cheers,
W00t

click it, it's funny and insightful at the same time. and it does involve voltron.

No he didn't - he was too engrossed in his reading.

After all, he needed to find out if spot would find the ball again or not.

To send a letter of support to the Thief-In-Chief

Thanks in advance,
W00t

Get Your Fascist War On Iraq On

VIETNAM 2 PREFLIGHT CHECK

1. Cabal of oldsters who won't listen to outside advice? Check.

2. No understanding of ethnicities of the many locals? Check.

3. Imposing country boundaries drawn in Europe, not by the locals? Check.

4. Unshakeable faith in our superior technology? Check.

5. France secretly hoping we fall on our asses? Check.

6. Russia secretly hoping we fall on our asses? Check.

7. China secretly hoping we fall on our asses? Check.

8. SecDef pushing a conflict the JCS never wanted? Check.

9. Fear we'll look bad if we back down now? Check.

10. Corrupt Texan in the WH? Check.

11. Land war in Asia? Check.

12. Right unhappy with outcome of previous war? Check.

13. Enemy easily moves in/out of neighboring countries? Check.

14. Soldiers about to be dosed with *our own* chemicals? Check.

15. Friendly fire problem ignored instead of solved? Check.

16. Anti-Americanism up sharply in Europe? Check.

17. B-52 bombers? Check.

18. Helicopters that clog up on the local dust? Check.

19. In-fighting among the branches of the military? Check.

20. Locals that cheer us by day, hate us by night? Check.

21. Local experts ignored? Check.

22. Local politicians ignored? Check.

23. Locals used to conflicts lasting longer than the USA has been a country? Check.

24. Against advice, Prez won't raise taxes to pay for war? Check.

25. Blue water navy ships operating in brown water? Check.

26. Use of nukes hinted at if things don't go our way? Check.

27. Unpopular war? Check.

Get Your Unilateral War On Iraq On

The moron-in-command to at read and write.

Cheers,
Woot

Get Your Unilateral War On Iraq On

Chronology of Events

Seymour Hersh writes an article in The New Yorker:
A Hawk's Business: Why was Richard Perle meeting with Adnan Khashoggi?

Richard Perle, on Wolf Blitzer's show, calls Seymour Hersh a terrorist

Read the interesting comments with historical comparisons at Talkingpointsmemo.com

More details available at:ENOUGH IS ENOUGH:
Richard Perle brands journalist Seymour Hersh a "terrorist"

Jack Shafer at Slate calls Richard N. Perle a pantywaist

Cheers,
W00t

From the CNN transcript:

There's an article in the New Yorker magazine by
Seymour Hersh that's just coming out today in which he makes a serious accusation against you that you have a conflict of interest in this because you're involved in some business that deals with homeland security, you potentially could make some money if, in fact, there is this kind of climate that he accuses you of proposing. Let me read a quote from the New Yorker article, the March 17th issue, just out now. "There is no question that Perle believes that removing Saddam from power is the right thing to do. At the same time, he has set up a company that may gain from a war."

PERLE: I don't believe that a company would gain
from a war. On the contrary, I believe that the
successful removal of Saddam Hussein, and I've
said this over and over again, will diminish the
threat of terrorism. And what he's talking about
is investments in homeland defense, which I think
are vital and are necessary. Look, Sy Hersh is the
closest thing American journalism has to a
terrorist, frankly.

BLITZER: Well, on the basis of -- why do you say
that? A terrorist?

PERLE: Because he's widely irresponsible. If you
read the article, it's first of all, impossible
to find any consistent theme in it. But the
suggestion that my views are somehow related for
the potential for investments in homeland
defense is complete nonsense.

BLITZER: But I don't understand. Why do you
accuse him of being a terrorist?

PERLE: Because he sets out to do damage and he
will do it by whatever innuendo, whatever
distortion he can -- look, he hasn't written a
serious piece since Maylie (ph).

BLITZER: All right. We're going to leave it right there

Get Your Unilateral War On Iraq On

Chronology of Events

Seymour Hersh writes an article in The New Yorker:
A Hawk's Business: Why was Richard Perle meeting with Adnan Khashoggi?

Ricard Perle, on Wolf Blitzer's show, calls Seymour Hersh a terrorist

Read the interesting comments with historical comparisons at Talkingpointsmemo.com

More details available at: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH:
Richard Perle brands journalist Seymour Hersh a "terrorist"

Jack Shafer at Slate calls Richard N. Perle a pantywaist

Cheers,
W00t

There's an article in the New Yorker magazine by
Seymour Hersh that's just coming out today in which
he makes a serious accusation against you that you
have a conflict of interest in this because you're
involved in some business that deals with homeland
security, you potentially could make some money if,
in fact, there is this kind of climate that he
accuses you of proposing. Let me read a quote from
the New Yorker article, the March 17th issue, just
out now. "There is no question that Perle believes
that removing Saddam from power is the right thing
to do. At the same time, he has set up a company
that may gain from a war."

PERLE: I don't believe that a company would gain
from a war. On the contrary, I believe that the
successful removal of Saddam Hussein, and I've
said this over and over again, will diminish the
threat of terrorism. And what he's talking about
is investments in homeland defense, which I think
are vital and are necessary. Look, Sy Hersh is the
closest thing American journalism has to a
terrorist, frankly.

BLITZER: Well, on the basis of -- why do you say
that? A terrorist?

PERLE: Because he's widely irresponsible. If you
read the article, it's first of all, impossible
to find any consistent theme in it. But the
suggestion that my views are somehow related for
the potential for investments in homeland
defense is complete nonsense.

BLITZER: But I don't understand. Why do you
accuse him of being a terrorist?

PERLE: Because he sets out to do damage and he
will do it by whatever innuendo, whatever
distortion he can -- look, he hasn't written a
serious piece since Maylie (ph).

BLITZER: All right. We're going to leave it right there

Get Your Unilateral War On Iraq On

Chronology of Events

Seymour Hersh writes an article in The New Yorker:
A Hawk's Business: Why was Richard Perle meeting with Adnan Khashoggi?

Ricard Perle, on Wolf Blitzer's, show calls Seymour Hersh a terrorist

Read the interesting comments with historical comparisons at Talkingpointsmemo.com

More details available at: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH:
Richard Perle brands journalist Seymour Hersh a "terrorist"

Cheers,
W00t

From the CNN transcript:

There's an article in the New Yorker magazine by
Seymour Hersh that's just coming out today in which
he makes a serious accusation against you that you
have a conflict of interest in this because you're
involved in some business that deals with homeland
security, you potentially could make some money if,
in fact, there is this kind of climate that he
accuses you of proposing. Let me read a quote from
the New Yorker article, the March 17th issue, just
out now. "There is no question that Perle believes
that removing Saddam from power is the right thing
to do. At the same time, he has set up a company
that may gain from a war."

PERLE: I don't believe that a company would gain
from a war. On the contrary, I believe that the
successful removal of Saddam Hussein, and I've
said this over and over again, will diminish the
threat of terrorism. And what he's talking about
is investments in homeland defense, which I think
are vital and are necessary. Look, Sy Hersh is the
closest thing American journalism has to a
terrorist, frankly.

BLITZER: Well, on the basis of -- why do you say
that? A terrorist?

PERLE: Because he's widely irresponsible. If you
read the article, it's first of all, impossible
to find any consistent theme in it. But the
suggestion that my views are somehow related for
the potential for investments in homeland
defense is complete nonsense.

BLITZER: But I don't understand. Why do you
accuse him of being a terrorist?

PERLE: Because he sets out to do damage and he
will do it by whatever innuendo, whatever
distortion he can -- look, he hasn't written a
serious piece since Maylie (ph).

BLITZER: All right. We're going to leave it right there

Get Your Unilateral War On Iraq On

Chronology of Events

Seymour Hersh writes an article in The New Yorker:
A Hawk's Business: Why was Richard Perle meeting with Adnan Khashoggi?

Ricard Perle, on Wolf Blitzer's, show calls Seymour Hersh a terrorist

Read the interesting comments with historical comparisons at Talkingpointsmemo.com

More details available at: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH:
Richard Perle brands journalist Seymour Hersh a "terrorist"

Cheers,
W00t

There's an article in the New Yorker magazine by
Seymour Hersh that's just coming out today in which
he makes a serious accusation against you that you
have a conflict of interest in this because you're
involved in some business that deals with homeland
security, you potentially could make some money if,
in fact, there is this kind of climate that he
accuses you of proposing. Let me read a quote from
the New Yorker article, the March 17th issue, just
out now. "There is no question that Perle believes
that removing Saddam from power is the right thing
to do. At the same time, he has set up a company
that may gain from a war."

PERLE: I don't believe that a company would gain
from a war. On the contrary, I believe that the
successful removal of Saddam Hussein, and I've
said this over and over again, will diminish the
threat of terrorism. And what he's talking about
is investments in homeland defense, which I think
are vital and are necessary. Look, Sy Hersh is the
closest thing American journalism has to a
terrorist, frankly.

BLITZER: Well, on the basis of -- why do you say
that? A terrorist?

PERLE: Because he's widely irresponsible. If you
read the article, it's first of all, impossible
to find any consistent theme in it. But the
suggestion that my views are somehow related for
the potential for investments in homeland
defense is complete nonsense.

BLITZER: But I don't understand. Why do you
accuse him of being a terrorist?

PERLE: Because he sets out to do damage and he
will do it by whatever innuendo, whatever
distortion he can -- look, he hasn't written a
serious piece since Maylie (ph).

BLITZER: All right. We're going to leave it right there

Get Your Unilateral War On Iraq On

Seymour Hersh writes an article in The New Yorker:
A Hawk's Business: Why was Richard Perle meeting with Adnan Khashoggi?

Ricard Perle, on Wolf Blitzer's, show calls Seymour Hersh a terrorist

Read the interesting comments with historical comparisons at
Talkingpointsmemo.com

More details available at: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH:
Richard Perle brands journalist Seymour Hersh a "terrorist"

Cheers,
W00t

Here is a copy of the CNN interview:

There's an article in the New Yorker magazine by
Seymour Hersh that's just coming out today in which
he makes a serious accusation against you that you
have a conflict of interest in this because you're
involved in some business that deals with homeland
security, you potentially could make some money if,
in fact, there is this kind of climate that he
accuses you of proposing. Let me read a quote from
the New Yorker article, the March 17th issue, just
out now. "There is no question that Perle believes
that removing Saddam from power is the right thing
to do. At the same time, he has set up a company
that may gain from a war."

PERLE: I don't believe that a company would gain
from a war. On the contrary, I believe that the
successful removal of Saddam Hussein, and I've
said this over and over again, will diminish the
threat of terrorism. And what he's talking about
is investments in homeland defense, which I think
are vital and are necessary. Look, Sy Hersh is the
closest thing American journalism has to a
terrorist, frankly.

BLITZER: Well, on the basis of -- why do you say
that? A terrorist?

PERLE: Because he's widely irresponsible. If you
read the article, it's first of all, impossible
to find any consistent theme in it. But the
suggestion that my views are somehow related for
the potential for investments in homeland
defense is complete nonsense.

BLITZER: But I don't understand. Why do you
accuse him of being a terrorist?

PERLE: Because he sets out to do damage and he
will do it by whatever innuendo, whatever
distortion he can -- look, he hasn't written a
serious piece since Maylie (ph).

BLITZER: All right. We're going to leave it right there

Get Your Unilateral War On Iraq On

You think if they have Benjamin Franklin spinning in his grave fast enough, they'll be able to power an internal combustion engine with it?

"The rare evening news conference, just
the second of the Bush presidency, came
as the United Nations prepared to hear
another report from chief weapons
inspector Hans Blix this morning, and as
U.S. allies including France, Russia and
Germany appeared to be hardening their
stance against war."

Before we know it, Dubya will be allowed to
ride his bicycle without training wheels.

Cheers,
W00t

Get Your War on Iraq On/a/