Slashdot Mirror

There is always the reliable uncylopedia for real reputable research.

Uncyclopida is so politically correct that I am sure the chinesse government would approve.

There is always the reliable uncylopedia for real reputable research.

Uncyclopida is so politically correct that I am sure the chinesse government would approve.

They may have blocked wikipedia, but they still have the uncyclopedia as a backup, so they should be good to go on their research- especially considering today's WotD;-)

They may have blocked wikipedia, but they still have the uncyclopedia as a backup, so they should be good to go on their research- especially considering today's WotD;-)

Reminds me a bit of the (slightly harsh) uncyclopedia article on German Grammar.

Interesting, however For The Win does not seem to parse naturally in the context of the OP. Fsck (sic) The World, noted below, seems a better fit, although it too does not parse.

Perhaps we should stop before one of us encounters EHS. Let's quit while we're ahead.

Which answer do you want: The fun one or the not so fun one?

It came from Uncyclopedia.

I'll put my faith in the Uncyclopedia any day. With in-depth and thoughful articles like the rise of Dino Jesus I'm always in the know!

I'll put my faith in the Uncyclopedia any day. With in-depth and thoughful articles like the rise of Dino Jesus I'm always in the know!

And flexibility incompatible...

I wonder if they even got the definition of piracy right... ;-)

From Uncyclopedia, you can put him on your Linux box as well.

~$ cd /usr/bin
/usr/bin$ sudo ln sudo fucking
/usr/bin$ fucking ln gdm google
/usr/bin$ fucking killall google

Yeah, it's an old edit. The new one is neither valid nor on topic.

Most likely something akin to kitten huffing.

On the other hand, worrying about potential communist sympathizers at this time is just plain stupid.

Looked at as an individual issue, yes, worrying about communism seems silly right now. But combined with the loyalty oaths, and the concern for stem cell research, it's obvious the Bush Administrations true goal - the war against the Commie Mutant Traitors!

Players buy their feral Nintendog at the beginning of the game, choosing from a variety of available breeds, then spend time with their new pet. They try time and time again to call their wild Nintendog to play with them, without success, and get a finger bitten in two when they try to give it a bath.

A ground-breaking study by XYZ inc. found Uncyclopedia having error rate -10% times more than Wikipedia. And the length of formers articles are on an average 1.25 times lengthier than wikipedia What a holy shit of comparison is it??? How do you compare free and open wikipedia with closed and economically-sucking britannica. Isn't very similar to comparing wikipedia and uncyclopedia.

This page is the most accurate biography I've seen of him anywhere. Highly recommended.

Yup, there it is.

He should have written for the Uncyclopedia, a much better place to waste one's talents.

In fact, I'm posting this response after following the process described above (on WinXP), and I have a history entry entitled "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA..."

AAAAAAA!

It's just a fad word for downloading audio from the Internet. This pretty much summarizes it. How did it get added to the dictionary so fast? It's not even generic - it was created in part based on a modern day product. If anything, it should be going into a slang reference guide not a dictionary.

make sure you understand what Australia is all about before you start judging them: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Australian/

But-but-but...

Uncyclopedia says that PHP is super-secure! I read it online, it must be true!

* Tongue planted firmly in cheek

The researchers apparently didn't find any instance of the gene among Slashdot editors.

The Bush administration claims to have found the gene among members of the cabinet, but when investigated, no traces were found.

The gene was first observed by in 1894.

At least we have truth revealed at http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr

http://www.uncyclopedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler _Sr

It looks like Uncyclopedia has even jumped on the bandwagon.

You forgot about him vowing to Fucking Kill(tm) all of those in sight.

Close enough?

Check out the Steve Ballmer article. http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Steve_Ballmer

Check out the Steve Ballmer article. http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Steve_Ballmer

Or maybe he meant Santa Claus?

I won't go into details, because this issue has already been discussed on Slashdot.

You could look up the proper definition on Wikipedia.

That's an oxymoron

You should just say no to people who sell books! You can get all your information for free from online encyclopedias. How dare "Tony Bove" try to sell a book! That's just a hidden tax.

Dark energy is the subtler form of dark matter. And even subtler is dark information - the stuff that nemory is made of.

Corporations know this for a fact, and the theory of evolution has grown boring in its never ending war with Intelligent Design and the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

Besides there is no real profit to be made backing either Evolution, Intelligent Design, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster. This is because all of them, as well as most scientific theories are full of big gaging holes, and the scientists who did the research fudged the reports so they could receive more funding and make more money.

The big money is to be made in The Theory of Change which is a true scientifc theory, and is even falsifiable if it can be proven that change does not exist and nothing ever changes ever. Since new evidence found changes the theory of change, it follows the theory of change that says it can change itself, because change is one of the major forces in the universe. What controled change and brought about the big bang and the creation of life itself? The theory of change says that in order for it to be a true scientifc theory and avoid psuedoscience by saying God, random chance, or some other entity or thing controls change, the theory of change says that it does not really say what controls change, but that it is a part of change management. Yet if new evidence is found the theory of change can be changed later on to reflect that evidence, as the theory of change predicts.

Evidence exists that lifeforms, since they first existed on the Earth, have gone through a series of changes. In fact, most parts of the universe go through series of changes according to the theory of change.

Don't believe or like the theory of change the way it is now? Just wait and maybe later it will change and then you will like it and support it.

The theory of change covers the big bang, gravity and other forces of the universe and unifies them, and replaces many well known popular scientific theories. I mean even Stephen Hawking was wrong about black holes, and cannot figure out the grand unification theory or even prove it, yet all the answers were in the theory of change all along and he never even knew it.

I assume you mean kitten huffing?

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Kitten_Huffing

And for those who don't know Jack Thompson: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson. Quote:

Thompson is fluent in Bullshit and has a Black Belt in Dumbfuckery.

http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/I_Can't_Believe_It's_ Not_Hitler#See_Also

More exactly, Sony rootkit huffs kittens.

Are the mods huffing kittens or something? Parent is not a troll. Overly pessimistic, yes. Troll? No.

When there's a -1: Pessimistic option, then he should be modded down. In the meantime, reread the moderator rules.

As to the parent, I can't say I agree that this will happen. I agree that Microsoft will try (RTF, anyone?), but long term I think that Microsoft just has too many anti-trust watchers breathing down their necks at the moment. Everytime Microsoft attempts to rely on their old tactics (no matter how sneaky they are about it) someone is going to cry foul. It may seem silly, "Them: Microsoft has a tiny incompatibility in their support of the format! Microsoft: It's just a bug! No bigge!" but such attacks can really screw with Microsoft's time to market and keep them tied up in the courts for a very long time.

Before a school board permits any teaching about Intelligent Design in science class, its proponents should have to provide some shred scientific evidence that supports their idea.

Do not let them waste time attacking the Theory of Evolution; discrediting idea A does not in any way pove idea B!

It is funny: Proponents of ID want to control what gets taught in science class, but they do not want to be bothered to do their own science "homework"!

Check out:
  http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design
  http://www.cafepress.com/intdesign

Yo momma's so fat, she generates ripples in gravity...

Good troll, sir!

It's about the same as if you mentioned that Chrisitians are bemused by Mormons. The two religions don't think of one another as "correct" even though one builds on the other. The only difference is that the Jewish and Christian faiths tend to be much more amicable toward one another.
All the Chrisitians I've ever met are completely friendly with everybody of every other religious domination, inasmuch as no "Chrisitians" can be said to exist.

The Vatican embraced the evolutionary theory several years ago under Pope John Paul III.
Yes, but "the new pope has indicated that he wishes to put the Catholic Church back onto a more conservative footing. He has pledged to allow celibate men and women to become priests (rather than just married men and women, under current practice) and to add abstinence to the list of permitted birth control methods." I'm sure creationism isn't far from the top of his agenda!

However, the Vatican regularly declared heresy against anyone who challenged the accepted "facts" of the Universe. Galileo is often cited as an example, but that was partly his own fault. He used satire to insult the pope (a good friend of his) and the pope was forced to respond. Galileo should have counted himself lucky to only get house arrest.
For the first time in my brief life I have seen a summary of Galileo's life more divorced from reality than Brecht's (brilliant) fictionalization. Good job, sir.

3. If you're going to mention Yahweh (aka YHWH, aka Jehovah, aka God of Israel) in proper Jewish context, you need to mark out some of the letters as a sign of respect. e.g. "Y-WH" or "G-d"
I think you know the rule but don't understand it. See, whenever you write down the name of God, you can't erase it. I had to open another Slashdot window just to read the comments -- and now I can't close this one either. Goddamnit. Bastard never should've penned the Torah in the first place!

1938 broadcast of an eyewitness report of an invasion from Mars caused a nationwide panic in 1938 http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Redundancy

See first entry here.

The real question is what other things you can package with it, and if they give you a discount for buying a package. Obviously GPL insurance isn't enough.

For instance, do they sell giant robot attack insurance as well? I feel its important to be protected from the ever present threat of robots. And this is only one of the many kinds of insurance that I'll need from them.

I'm certianly also going to need spontaneous existence failure insurance for all my stuff, werewolf treatment insurance for if I get bit, and bunny attack insurance.

If they can't provide all this insurance to go along with my GPL compliance insurance, I don't think I can take them seriously.

The real question is what other things you can package with it, and if they give you a discount for buying a package. Obviously GPL insurance isn't enough.

For instance, do they sell giant robot attack insurance as well? I feel its important to be protected from the ever present threat of robots. And this is only one of the many kinds of insurance that I'll need from them.

I'm certianly also going to need spontaneous existence failure insurance for all my stuff, werewolf treatment insurance for if I get bit, and bunny attack insurance.

If they can't provide all this insurance to go along with my GPL compliance insurance, I don't think I can take them seriously.

Stupid necrophobe. I bet you'd vote for a repeal of the No More Room In Hell Act too, wouldn't you? I think you should really meet some zombies before you judge them - they're quite the culturally diverse group of shuffling undead.

Stupid necrophobe. I bet you'd vote for a repeal of the No More Room In Hell Act too, wouldn't you? I think you should really meet some zombies before you judge them - they're quite the culturally diverse group of shuffling undead.