Slashdot Mirror


Playboy And...Linux?

The article's been up for only a little bit, but a huge number people have e-mailed that Playboy's Gillan has done a column on Linux. It's a typical media piece, explaining Linux but being featured in Playboy, I think, means that we've conquered the media. And I have, of course, no comment on what the sheer number of submissions must mean about our readers. *grin*

262 comments

  1. article? by cheese63 · · Score: 2

    What article? Playboy has articles???

    1. Re:article? by Super_Frosty · · Score: 0

      It does, but, honestly, who reads them? i challenge one person to swear under penalty of perjury that they read the articles in Playboy. I find that they are poorly written, but that might be because I'm distracted. :-)

      BTW, this article reminds me of the suckdot parody. "Linux possibly promoted somewhere." Fits nicely under the jihad penguin - which /. should definately adopt, IMHO.

      --
      No comment at this time
    2. Re:article? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It does, but, honestly, who reads them? i challenge one person to swear under penalty of perjury that they read the articles in Playboy. I find that they are poorly written, but that might be because I'm distracted. :-)

      You'll find that the articles in Playboy are generally quite high quality. Granted, the captions in the centerfolds are shallow, but the actual articles are quite good and well-written. I have to say that I wonder where you learned how to write if you think the articles are poorly written.

      In a recent issue (October? November? I can't remember.) a sizable section was devoted to covering civil liberties in schools, something that a lot of slashdot readers would be interested in (whether they were old enough to buy the magazine or not).

      So yes, I do read the articles. Not all of them, since they're not all interesting to me, but a fair percentage. Having said that, I don't exactly avert my eyes when at the pictorials, either. :)

    3. Re:article? by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      I'll swear -- one of the great things about Playboy writers is that they don't have to worry about censorship. piss off anyone you want, the advertisers are already known to not cave in to pressure from boycotts and other special interests.

      So they tend to be more willing to speak their mind. have you ever read the section on factiods (or whatever it's called?) where they tell you things like "In afghanistan, a woman can't have sex with a sheep unless they're legally married" and "a new study by the university of chicago revealed that over 27% of men prefer smoking a cigar to having sex with their own wives, while wives were 80% more likely to prefer watching a sad movie".

      that's stuff you don't get in USA Today!

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:article? by jimmyCarter · · Score: 1

      I love the liberal approach the magazine and it's writers seem to take on a variety of fronts.


      The Playboy interviews are awesome.
      Anyone catch the Mike Tyson interview two years ago? Intelligence personified.


      That's what I love about them high-school girls. I get older, they stay the same age... yes they do.
      --Wooderson 1976

      --

      -- jimmycarter
    5. Re:article? by wljones · · Score: 2

      Yes, Playboy has articles. I have read it, and at one time subscribed to it, since the Marilyn Monroe center picture in issue number one. The articles tend to be well written, thoughtful, and on a wide variety of subjects. Playboy does not fear controversial issues. Professional writers have grown to admire Playboy, because if the staff sees a good, but unsolicited, article, they will work with the writer to get it properly polished for publication. I found only one statement in the article that upset me. Gillian did not want to try a dual boot, dual disk configuration because of rumored problems. I have booted M$ and Linux from separate disks for years, using LILO.

  2. Tux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I won't be satisfied until we see a Tux centerfold in Playboy magazine.

    1. Re:Tux! by C.Lee · · Score: 0

      >I won't be satisfied until we see a Tux centerfold in Playboy
      >magazine.

      Wouldn't a Tux centerfold be in Play*GIRL* Magazine rather than Play*BOY* magazine?

    2. Re:Tux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wouldn't a Tux centerfold be in Play*GIRL* Magazine rather than Play*BOY* magazine?
      No way, dude! Tux is a chick! That's why we love her so!
    3. Re:Tux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Auto mechanic: I think you blew a seal! Tux: No, that's just ice-cream...

    4. Re:Tux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAaaaa.. thats a good joke.

  3. Finally! by SupremeOverlord · · Score: 3

    Finally, I can honestly say I read the articles!

    --

    ---- "A programmer is a person who solves a problem you didn't know you had in a way you don't understand."

    1. Re:Finally! by Hooptie · · Score: 1
      I started my subscription to Playboy early last year, at the request of my wife no less.
      Her words after looking at our first issue were "Hey, there really are articles in here!"

      Hooptie

      --
      "Heavens, it appears that my weewee has been stricken with rigor mortis!" -- Stewie Griffin
  4. It's not the Playboy bunny any more... by David+Ziegler · · Score: 1

    It's not the Playboy bunny any more, it's the Playboy penguin!

    -David Ziegler
    -dziegler@hotmail.com

    1. Re:It's not the Playboy bunny any more... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ::barf::

  5. Who would have thunk it by haus · · Score: 2

    So you guys do read something other than tech manuals...8)

    all persons, living and dead, are purely coincidental. - Kurt Vonnegut

  6. zum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zum

  7. Wow. Naked women AND a first post... by pipeb0mb · · Score: 0

    So, the chances for a naked and petrified /. seem a little closer tonight...

    1. Re:Wow. Naked women AND a first post... by pipeb0mb · · Score: 0

      Damn.

      :-)

      At least we have naked women still..

      (They do still have naked women...right?)

  8. Well what did you expect? by Microlith · · Score: 1

    And I have, of course, no comment on what the sheer number of submissions must mean about our readers. *grin*

    Well? Why wouldn't they "read" a magazine that has featured stories and articles from Asimov, Clarke, and many other famous Sci-Fi writers? Playboy actually IS more than just a porn-mag. In fact, I'd go so far as to call it a socially relevant magazine, and yes, a form of art. Playboy does have an air of respectability around it, compared to others...

    1. Re:Well what did you expect? by yetisalmon · · Score: 1

      Yesss! Is there also a 'Linux' pictorial included? Maybe some nude kernels and some good headshots of the shell. Welp...I cant wait to check out this one.....linux nudies....mmmmmmmmm

    2. Re:Well what did you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's kind of hard to read the articles in a magazine that you're holding sideways.

  9. Australia by SuperJ · · Score: 1

    And they thought the source code was bad!

    --

    Sheepdot: Open Source good, Closed Source baaaaaaad!

  10. Hooray for filters at work! by TheGreek · · Score: 5

    So I'm sitting here at work, and I reload Slashdot. Ooh! New article! Playboy article on Linux! I temporarily forget where I am and click through: BLOCKED BY SURFWATCH. I wonder if my supervisor's going to believe me when I say I was just trying to look at an article. :P

    1. Re:Hooray for filters at work! by Fudge.Org · · Score: 2
      Yeah, this very fear has prevented many people from going to my URL listing. ;)

      People are really uptight. I can understand why it has come to this. It's just one person's humor is another persons offense.

      I wonder what it is like working for some place like N2H2 where you update no-no URLs regularly.

      It seems like one way to harvest naughty URLs would be to just leave your email address laying all over the place in Usenet postings and on home pages. The email address could be a dropbox that parses incoming URLs for smutty, naughty, racy, and other -y word like contents.

      I just always wondered what it would be to work for a place that provides filters. Its like you could resell the listings as xml feed to search engine providers to allow for a "safe internet search". Perhaps this already exists? Half the time people put things like "HOT POODLE SEX" into Meta tags expecting a non-intelligent web robot to index it and go its merry way.

      I know this is offtopic to Linux in Playboy but it is ontopic in that a lot of filtering packages do in fact run on Linux boxes as proxy filters. :)
      http://www.mp3.com/fudge/

      --
      http://fudge.org
    2. Re:Hooray for filters at work! by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking how it would look to my boss if he saw in the proxy log that I downloaded http://www.playboy.com/digital/gillian/fullback.jp g (a kinda cool wallpaper - not pornographic ... really!)

    3. Re:Hooray for filters at work! by _alpha_ · · Score: 1

      I did the same... but I didn't get blocked!
      Surprise! I know I've tried once or twice with some of the more dubious links from Wired News and got blocked.
      Maybe the filters really only block when they see naughty words...

    4. Re:Hooray for filters at work! by Lonesmurf · · Score: 1

      Hot Kitty porn? Man, that has got to be the funniest thing that I have seen in weeks.

      Thanks, I REALLY needed a laugh.

      ---

    5. Re:Hooray for filters at work! by Astraea · · Score: 1
      Same here!! It's early, I wasn't thinking of where the link would take me (besides an article)...

      BLOCKED
      By WebSense

      Oops!!! Gotta love these filters... Although, it may be a BIT more interesting for me to try to explain, being female :)

    6. Re:Hooray for filters at work! by RocketRay · · Score: 1

      We have the same problem here w/ filters. So what do I do? Telnet through the firewall to my router at home, then lynx it!

  11. Bitterness, what bitterness? by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    1999-12-07 13:36:22 Opensource article in playboy (articles,humor) (rejected)

    Sigh. I wish people would let me know why they reject things.
    ---

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Bitterness, what bitterness? by at0m · · Score: 1

      Clearly it's because they got so many submissions - they only give credit for the first one. Plus it says somewhere (forget where) that slashdot rejects some insane percentage of submissions due to the sheer number of submissions they get.

    2. Re:Bitterness, what bitterness? by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

      Woah, that thread is hillarious. Took me 20 minutes to read ;-)
      ---

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  12. I'm blocked from accessing the site. by Jenova · · Score: 1

    Is there any other way that I can read the article? Singapore blocks www.playboy.com


    1. Re:I'm blocked from accessing the site. by Jenova · · Score: 1

      Forget it. I just got around the problem.

  13. peng-r0n? by Josh+Guffin · · Score: 3

    So now we just need some penguins in the centerfold, pictured in some skimpy little... hey wait, they're already naked =D

    Perhaps Miss January can cuddle with tux for 'warmth'

    1. Re:peng-r0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, that's beastiality.

    2. Re:peng-r0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dude, that's beastiality.
      Dude, there's no a in bestiality.

      Remember kiddies: in Texas, boys can't become cops if they've had sex with boys after age 14, but they get all the way up through age 16 for barnyard animals. True story. Just one of those things that makes you go, ``Hm.....''

    3. Re:peng-r0n? by C.Lee · · Score: 1

      >Dude, that's beastiality.

      I don't think Tux would complain......

    4. Re:peng-r0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, Texas: where you can't tell where the horse country ends and the whore's cunt tree begins. I always thought it was might strange when Fort Stockton ditched Mayor Canton for Mare Sweetlips. Remember: the reason they wear those big and talk cowboy boots is to so there's a place to snag the shagged she-sheep's snugglehooves.

    5. Re:peng-r0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahahahahahahaha oh my fucking GOD I haven't laughed that hard in a while... that post was just funny as SHIT.

  14. Playboy Icon for future news storys by MrBlack · · Score: 5

    I personally would like to see the slashdot crew add the playboy bunny icon to the list of news icons, so slashdot readers can be informed more quickly of linux-related playboy news as it breaks.

    1. Re:Playboy Icon for future news storys by Super_Frosty · · Score: 1

      Personally, having porn one click away just isn't good enough. Rob can start by replacing the ad banners with porn. Does he have a girlfriend? Is she hot? Would she be willing to model?

      I would then replace Linux news with pornography related news. Hell, if Rob does it gradually, he could turn this place into a porn site!

      --
      No comment at this time
    2. Re:Playboy Icon for future news storys by diazo · · Score: 1

      Yes, I believe i saw the fact that he has a girlfriend on Everything

  15. Re:i'M 3l33t gIv3 m3 WaR3z D00dz by SupremeOverlord · · Score: 0

    Haha, you took so long to type that in h4x0r that you got what, a fifth post? hahah.

    --

    ---- "A programmer is a person who solves a problem you didn't know you had in a way you don't understand."

  16. Ooooooooooooh sexy... by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4

    Man lookit the size of that laptop Torvalds is holding...

    What, you mean there's naked wimmin in here too?

  17. Damnit! by Erik+Fish · · Score: 0


    I read it for the articles, damnit!

  18. An idea.... by Mai+Longdong · · Score: 2

    Hmmmm....Beowulf 6 or 7 Playmates together and.....

    1. Re:An idea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beowulf 6 or 7 Playmates together and.....

      Get multiple orgasms? :o)

  19. I read it for the articles by diazo · · Score: 0

    Hey if my parents catch me with the magazine i can point out the fact that i was reading up on my favorite OS =) (and perhaps my favorite naked women as well.. ahem)

  20. NAKED AND PETRIFIED GIRLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS TIME, I AM ON-TOPIC

    WELL, MAYBE NOT ABOUT THE "PETRIFIED" PART

    BUT ABOUT THE "NAKED" PART

    :)

    HI FRIENDS

    1. Re:NAKED AND PETRIFIED GIRLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --YES!!!--

      Pokey

  21. Going mainstream? by Gruuk · · Score: 2

    Once you get into publications that have nothing to do with computers, one must admit that linux is in the mainstream now. We already knew that it was the darling buzzword in finance and of many techies (and related publications), but playboy? This is a surprise, although not a huge one. Linux has been growing a lot in the past year, so I guess it was to be expected... still... playboy? ;)

    What's nice is the author saying how easy to install the two distros he tried (Red Hat and Corel) were. I still remember installing Slackware 2.0 a few years ago, distributions have improved greatly in that regard. The two he tried are indeed very easy install-wise. Now, readers of this magazine know a bit more about Linux, which is a good thing.

    --
    De gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum
    1. Re:Going mainstream? by Ronin75 · · Score: 1

      What's nice is the author saying how easy to install the two distros he tried (Red Hat and Corel) were.

      Gillian Bonner, a Playmate, wrote this article. Called me biased, but Playmates are as qualified as anyone to be called "she". :)

    2. Re:Going mainstream? by gwalla · · Score: 1

      IIRC, she runs a game software company.
      ---

      --
      Oper on the Nightstar
  22. Sexy! by Mario+B · · Score: 2

    I knew Linux was sexy... I just didn't know it was that sexy! :)

  23. How the net has changed by weisserw · · Score: 1

    I remember when I first got on the net www.playboy.com was just a collection of static pages with some photos of naked women on them. Of course, it was impossible to download the photos because your net connection was too slow, but it makes me nostalgic to think of those simple page layouts that have since been completely obliterated.

    -W.W.

    --
    "Well it should be obvious to even the most dim-witted individual who holds an advanced degree in hyperbolic topology...
    1. Re:How the net has changed by SeanNi · · Score: 2

      Oh, man... does that ever take me back! I remember accessing the site (it must've been just about the only porn site on the net then -- how things have changed!) with the w3c's browser... I seem to recall it (the browser) simply being called "www."

      But it was text-only, so to get to the good stuff, I had to instruct it to download the actual images to the AIX (college) shell account I was doing all this through.

      Then, after I was finished browsing, I could zmodem all the images back to my home computer (which took for ever and ever and ever and ever...) and finally view them through a third-party image viewer (Paintbrush didn't do JPegs). I can't for the life of me remember what it was called, although I still remember zooming in and in and in, and the nipple just getting grainier and grainier and blockier and blockier...

      Hmm, my first brush with Unix, I believe.

      Ahh... nostalgia. Thanks for the memories!
      --
      - Sean

      --
      It's a fine line between trolling and karma-whoring... and I think I just crossed it.
      - Sean
    2. Re:How the net has changed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be interesting to do a poll on how many Linux/Unix fans started out learning Unix because that was the only system connected to the internet from which they could download porn from...

  24. Playboy Programmers ? by ScottyLad · · Score: 5

    I was quite surprised to see your article posted here. Having never read Playboy (yes, honestly!) I thought it was all pictures and no words. I was even pleasantly surprised to discover that the article was well researched and well written. (I'll leave out my personal bias towards Debian).

    What did get me thinking is why a magazine full of tits'n'ass would want to waste valuable picture space on a nerdy topic like Linux (I maintain it's "Lie-nucks" though - ask Linus;-)). Then I realised it's all tied in with the telecommuting revolution. Many years ago, no self-respecting programmer would contemplate coding before growing an uneven beard, and donning a cardigan and sandals before mumbling incoherently should any annoying coworkers interrupt. As Time has advanced, we have started working from home. As very few people actually code in COBOL anymore, the requirement for uneven beards and sandals has disappeared, but also this has drawn us towards Playboy.

    Coding from home isn't like work anymore, all you need is a cold cup of coffee and sit down at your workstation and get on with it. Usually it's not until the first time the doorbell goes that I realise I'm actually sat naked at my desk - by the time I pull some pants on and answer the door the caller has gone. (This is the telecommuting equivilant of all those annoying co-workers) Obviously someone at Playboy has made the perfectly reasonable assumption that there are an army of naked men sitting naked at their desks doing work nobody seems to understand. After further research, Playboy discovered that the vast majority of these naked men were chanting about some kind of god called "Torvalds" Undeterred by the god-like status of our idol, the enterprising magazine decided to book Linus as their centrefold. Imagine the editors horror when a Scandinavian male software engineer turns up for the shoot. Realising that the average reader of Playboy might be somewhat shocked at the site of a full frontal Linus Torvals on the centre pages, they hastily changed their plan and asked the great Open Source Master what alternative article they could possible post.

    That, my friends, is the honest truth on how Playboy come to be writing articles on Linux ;-)

    When a felon's not engaged in his employment, or maturing his felonious little plans, his capacity for innocent enjoyment is just the same as any honest mans - Gilbert and Sullivan

    --
    Philosopher (n) - a wise person who is calm and rational; someone who lives a life of reason with equanimity
  25. Articles? by barzok · · Score: 0

    There are articles?

  26. That IS the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got around the problem by finding an independent proxy server, or by going through Anonymizer, or something like that.

    You SHOULD get around the problem by lobbying your country's legislature to permit intellectual freedom on the part of the adult citizens of Singapore.

    But then, I don't live in Singapore, so that's just one unwashed, illiterate American's opinion.

    1. Re:That IS the problem by Buaku · · Score: 1

      Is he even allowed to lobby them in Singapore? I don't know.

    2. Re:That IS the problem by Jenova · · Score: 1

      > on the part of the adult citizens of >Singapore.

      The problem is:
      Can we trust the mass who are unaccustomed to that form of freedom to behave properly should that freedom be allowed? Can they adjust or just abuse the hell out of it?

      IMHO, proxy filtering is there just to pacify parents who are worried about kids surfing pr0n. Or whatever.

      Duh. I just wanted to read the article.

    3. Re:That IS the problem by binarybits · · Score: 1

      Can they adjust or just abuse the hell out of it?

      How exactly would one abuse unrestricted access to the web?

    4. Re:That IS the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can we trust the mass who are unaccustomed to that form of freedom to behave properly should that freedom be allowed? Can they adjust or just abuse the hell out of it?"

      It's a matter of perspective, I suppose. Setting aside the question of just what "behaving properly" should consist of, you really ought to start asking questions about who should be the judge of it. You obviously put a great deal of faith in your government to choose your permitted reading material wisely. Such a degree of control over access to information may seem excessive to some of us in the West who are unfamiliar with your culture and customs. Do you ever wonder if you are missing out on anything you ought to know about?

      Obviously there are plenty of technical hacks an intelligent person such as yourself can use to get around your government's censorship of the Internet. So in effect they're not _really_ telling you what sites you can visit. I'm not denying that. I'm just wondering if you don't feel a little strange having to use technological (and possibly illegal) measures to decide for yourself what you can view on the 'Net.

      By the way this is not a flame or an "America rules, everybody else sucks" kind of post, just a genuine expression of curiosity.

    5. Re:That IS the problem by Jenova · · Score: 1

      I'm not denying that. I'm just wondering if you don't feel a little strange having to use technological (and possibly illegal) measures to decide for yourself what you can view on >the 'Net Without a doubt - yes. Well at least if I don't like it here, I can move.
      Such a degree of control over access to information may seem excessive to some of us in the West who are unfamiliar with your culture and customs. The forum is no way a good place to describe what this place(Singapore) is like. I guess you'll have to live here for a while to understand what its really like. If you like a conformist, stable and relatively riot-free place to live in, I guess this is it. YMMV.

  27. Trying to get me fired? by PD · · Score: 2

    This is what I get when I try to access the article:


    IBM's internal systems must be used only for conducting IBM's business, or for purposes authorized by IBM management. Use is subject to audit at any time by IBM management.


    YOU HAVE JUST ATTEMPTED TO ACCESS A WEBSITE THAT CONTAINS SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL. THIS IS A DIRECT VIOLATION OF IBM's INTERNET USE GUIDELINES AND IBM's BUSINESS CONDUCT GUIDELINES.
    CONTINUED DISREGARD OF IBM's GUIDELINES WILL RESULT IN DISCIPLINARY ACTION UP TO AND INCLUDING SEPARATION.

    IBM has the right to monitor its employees' and others' use of IBM's systems and assets including use on the Internet.

    1. Re:Trying to get me fired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading Slashdot probably isn't related to IBM's business either...

    2. Re:Trying to get me fired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weird.

      Try going to 'sexpics.com' and 'youngteens.com' too - it may be just a fluke.

      For best results, close the door and reload a few times.

      Let us know if you can get through... :>

    3. Re:Trying to get me fired? by SwissPope · · Score: 1

      The best part is that you'll get that message when you try to go to the page when using Lynx. [sexxxy39483.gif] ooh baby

  28. We haven't seen the end... by Linux+Freak · · Score: 1

    What's next, ``Linux Does Dallas''? (Starring Linus Torvalds, Bob Young, several stuffed penguins, and a box of Red Hat CD's. Follow our studly duo around the state capital on their kinky exploits. Hear young women call out, ``Open Source me, baby!'' as they see the sexy pair.)

    P.S. 40th!

    (Score: -1, Funny)

    1. Re:We haven't seen the end... by PovRayMan · · Score: 1

      "Compile my kernel, baby!" - Woman
      "I'm gunna segfault!" - Man

      This post is really tasteless. Please don't moderate me down. I really tried hard to get to my 21 karma.

      -PovRayMan

  29. Here they come by Stiletto · · Score: 2

    What a story to bring out the trolls!

    Let's get them out of the way before they get out of hand:

    1. Naked and petrified

    2. Above-mentioned actress open-source, copyrighted and undistributable.

    3. Any combination of obscenities, ALL-CAPS, and repeated 50 times, repeated 50 times, repeated 50 times...

    4. MEEPT

    5. Llamas (where is that guy?)

    6. Karma whore!!

    7. FIRST POST, PLAYBOY STYLE!

    I hope I did not forget any.

    thank you.
    ________________________________

    1. Re:Here they come by weisserw · · Score: 1

      You know, for those of us who have our default threshold set at 1, the only time we have to hear about these retarded things is from pointless posts like yours.

      -W.W.

      --
      "Well it should be obvious to even the most dim-witted individual who holds an advanced degree in hyperbolic topology...
    2. Re:Here they come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      5. Llamas (where is that guy?)
      thats randall schwartz (pronounced "shorts"), and hes probably in some childrens petting zoo for the night.
    3. Re:Here they come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never realized they had zoos where you were allowed to pet children. [ducking]

  30. GOTTA be for the articles. There's better pr0n. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People buying playboy MUST do it for the articles. Face it. There's usually 4 spreads of chicks in there- the centerfold, the spread before the centerfold, the spread feature from the cover, and the black and white celeb shots in the back. Add a few pages in Dec or is it Jan that recap the previous centerfolds. The pictures/non-pictures ratio across all the pages is pretty low. If it's pron ye seeks there are cheaper mags out there PACKED with flesh, hardcore AND non-hardcore, or even topic specific. WHat's the big deal about Playboy?

    1. Re:GOTTA be for the articles. There's better pr0n. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WHat's the big deal about Playboy?

      Well, to start with, they've got the hottest chicks.

    2. Re:GOTTA be for the articles. There's better pr0n. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought this 1965 or something Playboy thinking I can finally see some skin in PLayboy's glory day. And it turned out has as little picture as the current playboy. Blad! The Playboy channel best moment video is the best of playboy video I ever seen.

      Only in American can a semi-monopoly corporation last so long with such substandard products. Kind of like the Bond flicks in 80s

      CY



    3. Re:GOTTA be for the articles. There's better pr0n. by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Playboy does have really good interviews and very good political commentaries from time to time. And yes, people do buy for the articles (you can see the current month t... samples on the net, no need to buy), especially if their wife does not mind ;-)

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  31. HE? by JustShootMe · · Score: 1

    Ummm, a woman wrote that article, ma'am.

    --
    For linux tips: http://www.linuxtipsblog.com
  32. Slashdot crunches porn sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Slashdot already pulles a hell of a lot more readers than a porn site!

    I like what that says about our world.

  33. Excellent pro-Linux article. by Buaku · · Score: 2
    I found the article very well done. Gillian actually took the time to install two different distributions and try them out. That is totally amazing. That's about two more distributions than the average journalist would try. She also did a good job of explaining source code vs. binaries and the concept of Open Source in such a way that non-computer people understand it.

    I'm a little less sure than Gillian about the future of Linux on the desktop, but we'll see. I don't think that will happen until Linux has better game support and a better GUI.

    As for the impact of the article, now that women with appellations like "Miss April, 1996" are starting to get on the Linux bandwagon, it's bound to get more popular :) I bet Red Hat's stock goes up some more as well.

    1. Re:Excellent pro-Linux article. by mystryda · · Score: 1

      ya, i thought the article was a very good survey, as well. what i really thought was missing, though, was some info on the security advantages of *nix os's over that other crap most pc's are running. being able to actually have a secure box is priceless. i just know that when i portscan a windows box, the program basically laughs, whereas *nix systems generally get respect. plus the ability to set permissions for those of us who have multiple accounts (not to mention the dangers of constantly logging in as root, especially on X).

      --
      miskam evets
    2. Re:Excellent pro-Linux article. by dsplat · · Score: 1

      Now if we can just get her to pose in a Slashdot, Beware of Nerd T shirt ...

      --
      The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
    3. Re:Excellent pro-Linux article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As for the impact of the article, now that women with appellations like "Miss April, 1996" are starting to get on the Linux bandwagon, it's bound to get more popular :) I bet Red Hat's stock goes up some more as well.

      Er, how do you know Hef didn't buy the rights to create a fictional persona to go with the Miss April pictures, and farmed out the writing to some cigar-chomping beer-bellied unshaven hack?

      Just kidding, I think ;-/

    4. Re:Excellent pro-Linux article. by Buaku · · Score: 1

      Did you follow the link to her website, Blackdragon? She's involved in some technical businesses.

  34. 2 hundred and what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your reasoning of inane humour ha ha has reacted my postage. The sunce's will not enter your through your hand and summon the forklift santa's to drop phantom boxes on your head. Fear, because the santa's are drunk and trapped in the factory.

    I personally do not like that mag, goto The Hun!

    ... thehun.net/

    Also, there is nothing wrong with seeing a little boobies. Or big boobies for that matter.

    Ok ok...
    I find it pretty cool that these Miss Month's go out and research for quite scrumptous articles such as this one.

    She doesn't know that it's all been UNIX damn it :oP DOS in the eighties, Windows in the nineties? Arrgh... who wants DOS when you can have like, over 100 more commands with all those *NIX!

    Then there's BSD. Hrmm, Linux has a way to go to reach those clueless newbies (as bitched about in that UF article, lol, funny ranting going on. Oh yea, UF is not that funny and the dude who bitched at UF and made that article has stupid rants.).

    I'm drunk what's the subject, 2 hundred and what?
    What was that joke about? lol, I didn't get it. pudding something, lol.

    - Ukrainian Goblet

    Did you hear about the Tibetan and the .sig file?

  35. Yeah, I just read it with lynx! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey, think about this: a bunch of guys who publish pictures of naked women every month run an article about Linux to increase circulation!

    Welcome to the mainstream, baby!

    1. Re:Yeah, I just read it with lynx! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But the smartest Unix hackers have always been gay (and yes, I mean that in a good way :-). Well, the BSD Unix types, that is. The SysV Unix types have been asexual monks. Gosh, what a choice. :-)

      In any case, they've no wives and kids to deal with, so get to use more of their brains and time for hacking. :-)

      We should have a Unix cloister where we can take temporary vows and be granted asylum for unmolested hacking! Now that's a holy order with a cybertwist!

  36. Ooops by Gruuk · · Score: 1

    My bad; should have previewed my post before posting it, I guess :)
    My apologies for such a faux pas.

    --
    De gustibus et coloribus non est disputandum
  37. Best possible medium! by The+Creator · · Score: 3

    Who reads playboy? Well.. middle aged males i.e. The Bosses! The people with power! And what are they reading now?* M$-bashing! And combined with naked women. The advertisers dream!
    *I assume that they read the articles.

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  38. Playboys and Playgirls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think about it with your eyes squinted, you could argue that Playgirl would be a more likely connection for Unix geeks than Playboy -- look at the commands! On Unix, if you just want the top, then some good head commands will do it to it. Likewise, there's no chick command, but everybody knows what a great friend the man command is. I think the check bits are in libc. Think about how isatty(3) is really "is a titty" and fcntl(3) is actually "eff cuntal". Now, I'll grant you that finger is nicely bisexual, but then, so are a lot of hackers. :-)

  39. Slashdot readers are pr0n fiends! by Uruk · · Score: 0

    But then again, is that so bad?

    Blatant promotion: http://www.heck.com/annie/

    For those who have never heard of Annie Sprinkle, she's a sex positive uhm, performance artist who has some very interesting things to say.

    And you can't really say that linux doesn't have anything to do with sex, since ESR has been jerking us around for years


    --
    -- Truth goes out the door when rumor comes innuendo. -- Groucho Marx
  40. "Miss April, 1996" is now a he?!?!?! by Buaku · · Score: 1
    EGADS!!!! Get the Surgeon General on the line! We need warning labels on all Linux distributions!!!

    WARNING!! The Surgeon General has determined that using this software may cause maleitis and geekiness in beautiful women.

  41. I am a horny hobbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Halloo there, my name is Frodo Baggins, and I want to talk to ya youngsters. There's something you need to know Playboy is a bad site, and you should stay away from it. You need to come to good sites that show naked little boys recieving it up the ass. That's the kind of site I like. Just sumthin' old Frodo wanted you to know. Now come here and sit on my lap.

    1. Re:I am a horny hobbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sweet Jesu we needs ta save da chirrun, that there's da CHIDE MOLESTER himself beat him with a big stick pleez

  42. This is great! by Zach+Baker · · Score: 1

    Keep 'em coming! I mean, sorry if you work at a place that's needlessly preoccupied with your browsing habits, of course. I just wanted to say thanks for sharing that big brother message, it's a classic!

  43. Clearing my sig up by cheese63 · · Score: 2

    Ok, i get alot of emails about this:

    The quote is from a former mtv skit show, "the state". It was a skit with two guys named barry and levan, and their two hundred and forty dollars, worth of pudding. the state was the best skit show ever, in it's short running it captivated my interest every time it was on. I'm changing the "foty" to "forty", because I can no longer remember why I left out the "r".

    1. Re:Clearing my sig up by generic-man · · Score: 2

      I'm changing the "foty" to "forty", because I can no longer remember why I left out the "r".

      Far be it from me to read your mind, but "foty" sounds more Ebonics-like. This would match the dialect with "puddin" and "awwwwww yeah". (Personally, I preferred "foty," but it's your signature *g*)

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Clearing my sig up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhh!

      I remember The State! It's what made MTV good.

      Kids in the Hall is also good, along with a small amount of Saturday Night Live. What else, hrmm... oh yea, that Russian show based off America's Win a Million or something... Would You Like to Win a Meal?

      Can't forget Ukrainian Party Hour! One helluva hour of old men chasing rabbits for dinner in the snow on the scary outskirts of their tiny secluded villages!

      - The Ukrainian Goblet

      Did you hear about the Mongolian with the .sig file?

    3. Re:Clearing my sig up by cheese63 · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, and remind me why I had it there in the first place.

    4. Re:Clearing my sig up by prizog · · Score: 1

      I didn't see the show, but calculating on the back of a napkin, $240 of pudding is like a bathtub full, right? at least if you buy the tiny supermarket packs...

    5. Re:Clearing my sig up by Biff+Cool · · Score: 1
      I believe it was actually a car trunk full, but a fairly large car trunk so a bathtub full is about the right amount. Good Figuring.

      Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.

      --

      Conscience is the inner voice which warns us that someone may be looking.
      -- H. L. Mencken

  44. Different icons by Anonymous+Bastard · · Score: 0

    How about little pr0n animations for the icons instead of the bunny logo.

  45. Dirty Unix Commands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Apropos applying head, making love, sending a man through more, loopback mounts (autoeroticism!), stripping programs (does it have 12 steps? :-), and fingering your neighbour, here are some risqué Unix commands from my /{,usr/}{s,}bin directories:
    apply apropos arch as asa at awk badsect banner batch biff cal calendar cat chat clear co compress cursor cut date diction diff dig dump echo ed eject error ex expand explain false fed file find finger flex fold from grog grotty groups halt head help host id ident indent info init install join jot kill lam last leave less lex lint locate lock logger look lynx machine mail make man more mount named newaliases nice page paste patch ping quota reboot refer renice reset restore route routed script showmount shutdown size sleep sort split spray strings strip style sum sync tail talk tar tee test time tip top touch units unzip uptime users vacation view wall what whatis whereis which who whoami whois window write yacc yes zip
    How creatively naughty can you get? Will it run under #!/bin/sh? And will Playboy print it in their forii? :-)
  46. great... by labiss · · Score: 2

    now we have a few million more 13 year old kids who are aware about linux. Get ready, #LinuxHelp.

    David

    I can't believe I put pants on for this.
    --Homer Simpson


    1. Re:great... by Foogle · · Score: 1
      Thousands of cries for help, trying to get Netscape Messenger to automatically download all the jpegs out of alt.binaries.erotica.linux.sex :)

      -----------

      "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

    2. Re:great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >alt.binaries.erotica.linux.sex Actually,I don't know if this one exists,but I've seen alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.unix

  47. Open source by jesser · · Score: 1
    From page 2 of the article,

    Linux is based on an open source policy. By its definition, "open source" means that anyone can have free access to the source code of a software program and thus the opportunity to modify and improve it, as long as their changes are then published to the community at large.

    I thought you didn't have to distribute anything after making modifications, but you were not allowed to distribute binaries without at least an offer of source code. Since I see this kind of statement a lot, am I wrong or are journalists confused?

    --

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
    1. Re:Open source by rhk · · Score: 1

      I believe you are correct. It seems to be a common oversimplification.

    2. Re:Open source by Midnight+Coder · · Score: 1

      An open source license is a contract between you and the owner of a software program. It gives you rights to redistribute, modify and use software under certain conditions.

      The GPL is one open source license it requires that the source be made available when binaries are distributed. (This is one of the conditions you must adhere to in order to redistribute the code). Your statement is a correct for the GPL license.

      There are many other open source licenses which are less restrictive than the GPL and allow redistribution of binaries without making the source available.

  48. Corel with Pagemaker? by NMerriam · · Score: 2


    While I see everyone is having a field day with the obvious "reading it for the articles" jokes, I do have a serious comment/question.

    "Corel touts its product as a version for the end user and plans to package it with many of its other products, such as PageMaker,CorelDRAW, QuattroPro and Paradox."

    I assume this is a mistake, since pagemaker isn't available for Linux, and Corel doesn't distribute it anyways. But what was she talking about? Did she mean FrameMaker? even that isn't out yet (AFAIK) and it still wouldn't be a Corel product.

    I don't have a Corel CD, so what's the deal? Is corel going to be distributing FrameMaker/LINUX for/with Adobe, or is this confused or am I confused?...

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    1. Re:Corel with Pagemaker? by Chris+Andreasen · · Score: 1

      I admit that I don't own a copy of Corel to back this up, and I don't remember where I read it (probably on LinuxWorld.org or some ZDNet article) but I remember reading somewhere that Corel bundles the native WordPerfect Linux binary and the MS-Windows binaries for its other products and uses Wine to run them.
      -Chris Andreasen

      --
      -Chris Andreasen
  49. Beer? by jesser · · Score: 2
    Hmmm.. that ad on the left.. is that an ad for free beer?

    --

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  50. Screenshots by jesser · · Score: 1
    Since they decided to use small/blurry screenshots, why didn't they include some soft porn in a mozilla window? Oh wait... then I might not have been able to argue that I had been reading an article based on the page I had it open to.

    --

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  51. Re: Happens to me too by webslacker · · Score: 1

    Don't worry about it man. Usually when a grip of people submit a story, they accept the first submission and reject everyone else who punched the submit button a second too late. Sometimes they'll even reject the first guy who submitted it if they feel like writing up their own story introduction instead of using the one that the story submitter wrote.

  52. Clueless! by letchhausen · · Score: 1
    Wow you really are clueless! Playboy has made a mint on playing up to all the things that "men" are into and technology has been one of the favorites since the beginning. At first it was tech as the accoutrement of the privileged "Bachelor", but that position has changed as tecnology has become the tool of the richest bachelors today: computer programmers. Playboy has always had tons of articles and as a result, the smallest ratio of pix to text of all the "Mens" mags out there. It' s wimpy (read chaste) pictorials have also left in it a somewhat no-man's land until with videos and a emphasis on "Men's Lifestyle's" (along with a more conservative constituency) it has regained prominence as the magazine that you don't have to be embarrassed to leave on a coffeetable.

    Actually it's surprising that it took them this long to do an article on Linux since so much mainstream press already has and Playboy is very up on what is hip in the mainstream. Not that I would ever read such tripe, I get my news from the news and my porn from the internet and don't think that I need such lame publications as this to "define my lifestyle". Many do, however, though if porn is your game, there are far randier and more honest alternatives both in print and on the net.

    I bet if there were numbers for how many Slashdot readers were arriving from XXX sites we'd all be smiling guiltily.

    --
    Hey, you think your house is cool?
  53. Oh my god. by Matt2000 · · Score: 4

    [Make your own joke about Linux in Playboy]

    "I know we all go on about only reading the articles, but did you see that [insert unattractive Linux celeb here] centerfold!? Oh my god, check out the [disk array/mouse pad/beowulf cluster] on that one!"

    There ya go, now you don't need to read the rest of the posts.

    Hotnutz.com

    --

  54. Gillian is a slashdot fan .... by NP · · Score: 2

    Taken from a chat with gillian ...

    (http://cyber.playboy.com/members/viplounge/chat /transcripts/1999-10-20-A.html)

    guest22: What are your favorite websites?
    gillianbonner: I really like shockwave.com. It's a very cool site. I also like slashdot.org. It is computer-based. Another site that I really like is called astroabby.com because I am an astrology junkie!

    And yes, I only read it for the articles ....

    1. Re:Gillian is a slashdot fan .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      [On favorite websites] ``I also like slashdot.org. It is computer-based.''
      Golly, that's just, like, way clever. All websites are ipso facto computer-based.
    2. Re:Gillian is a slashdot fan .... by Foogle · · Score: 1
      Not necessarily... I have a web-server running off a pile of french-toast in my kitchen.

      -----------

      "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

    3. Re:Gillian is a slashdot fan .... by mikera · · Score: 1

      Why are geeks always so bloody pedantic?

    4. Re:Gillian is a slashdot fan .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are not pedantic. We are precise. It comes from dealing with compiles with exacting standards.

  55. so this is what 'lay' people think of linux eh? by Agent+Drek · · Score: 3

    couldn't resist :)

  56. The End of the World is Nigh! by PiMan · · Score: 1
    Richard Stallman made it into Playboy.

    Get ready for the 4 penguins of the apocalypse...

    --
    Windows 2000: Designed for the Internet. The Internet: Designed for UNIX.
    1. Re:The End of the World is Nigh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Four Penguins?

      Linus, Cox, esr, rms?

      I was happy though; one of the very few mass-media Linux articles I've seen that even attempted to balance the diversity. They mentioned Redhat first, but pictured Corel. They quoted Stallman, but no ESR.

      Good Work guys!

  57. I'm betting it's true by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

    Playboy articles - yeah, I read it too - are generally very good both for content and accuracy. The article said Corel plans to include the apps, just as it said Redhat is "[working on] upcoming desktop applications." I bet Corel will package those apps with their distro - might cost a bit more tho.

  58. politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, and i'd have to say, as a subscriber to playboy, if you asked me ANY question about hefner's political views from abortion to war, i could give you an in-depth analysis. anyone who thinks playboy is just a skin rag obviously has never opened up a copy. if you want a skin rag, read cheri or gallery. playboy only has about three pictorials an issue. also, have you checked out gillian bonner's website? she seems like quite an entrepreneur.

    1. Re:politics by jflynn · · Score: 1

      We have some supreme court freedom of speech decisions to thank Hefner for as well. To call him a liberal these days is a disservice. But he helped define old style civil-libertarian liberalism in America.

  59. Tuxware vs. Bloatware by mrsam · · Score: 2

    This is the first article that I've read which actually touches on the subject that I don't think I ever heard anyone mention before:

    ---------------------------------------------

    [ Talking about the Windows OS ]

    Worse, nobody dares change it. Nobody dares to fix bugs because it's such a mess that fixing one bug might just break a hundred programs that depend on that bug. ... Whoa, that's some serious dissing. But I have to agree; as I work, I can just sense the inefficiency of the Windows OS.

    [ Talking about trying out the Linux OS ]

    I could just feel the power under the hood of this slick and efficient interface.

    ---------------------------------------------

    Literally, when I use Win 98 or NT, I can really sense the inefficient, bloated, puddles of fat rippling behind the monitor screen. And I'm not running on ancient hardware - I've got a dual PII with 256 MB RAM and UW SCSI. Still, that's not enough to cover up all that bloated waste of code.

    Running Linux "feels" different, and I'm not really talking just about the immediate responsiveness. Right from the beginning, you begin with a fresh start. When you boot Win98, when the splash screen disappears and the initially blank wallpaper pops up, and you sit there waiting for all the icons to show up, as the disk grinds an grinds away, you can't help but wonder what in ghods earth is going on down there. You sit there, cross your fingers, and hope that whatever crap its trying to load will work right, and not BSOD on me. Time and time again I swap some bit of hardware in the system, then boot into Windoze, and be greeted with some unwholly DLL upchucking all over the place, and then leaving me with a mess to clean up.

    Cycle the machine, and after LILO load the kernel, I just don't get the same feeling that there's a voodoo ritual going inside the gray box. Everything comes up, nice, lean, and mean. You know exactly what's going on. Everything is highly modular, well organized, and in its place.
    --

    1. Re:Tuxware vs. Bloatware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to say this, but Linux becomes asquerous bloatware when you compare Redhat with one of the leaner and trimmer distros, like NetBSD or OpenBSD.

    2. Re:Tuxware vs. Bloatware by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1
      What the hell does 'asquerous' mean?

      read: select "select individual packages" and specify services to start on boot.

      How is BSD "trimmer?"

    3. Re:Tuxware vs. Bloatware by G27+Radio · · Score: 2

      Literally, when I use Win 98 or NT, I can really sense the inefficient, bloated, puddles of fat rippling behind the monitor screen. And I'm not running on ancient hardware - I've got a dual PII with 256 MB RAM and UW SCSI. Still, that's not enough to cover up all that bloated waste of code.

      A specific example of this: When I try to make a directory (create a folder) from the "choose file" box in Windows the hard drive usually thrashes around for several seconds as if it's loading an application or swapping or whatever. I mean, wtf is that about? Does a simple system call to the kernel require all that? It's like that in 95, 98, and NT no matter how powerful the machine is. Sorry, that's just a pet peeve that I had to get off my chest...

      numb

  60. Removable media and Linux. by Daltorak · · Score: 1

    Oh great, did they cover how to use external drives?

    Step 1: Mount your removable media.

    Step 2: Perform Input/Output... higher speeds are preferred.

    Step 3: Unmount when I/O is finished and buffers have been flushed.


    Let's not get into issues about how Linux can have many drives mounted at once... especially those "scuzzy" ones. Bleh.

    Oh yeah... hopefully they didn't find those kinky man pages included with emacs...

    Daltorak

    1. Re:Removable media and Linux. by C.Lee · · Score: 0

      >Oh great, did they cover how to use external drives?
      >Step 1: Mount your removable media.
      >Step 2: Perform Input/Output... higher speeds are preferred.
      >Step 3: Unmount when I/O is finished and buffers have been flushed.
      >Let's not get into issues about how Linux can have many drives mounted
      >at once... especially those "scuzzy" ones. Bleh.

      What are you ranting about? I find actually using my Iomega external parallel port drive easier under Linux than it is under Windows. Let's see you put more than one partition on a Zip diskette formatted for use with Windows. I know guys who've installed two or more seperate Linux-formatted partitions on the same Zip disk, though this something I've never done myself. I like how linux treats the Zip drive as a normal drive, you can format it,eject the disk from the drive,ect using the normal linux comands.

    2. Re:Removable media and Linux. by Daltorak · · Score: 1

      It's humour, Mr. Lee. I'm playing on the word 'scuzzy' in the context of slimy, sleazy, etc... since we all know there are a great many guys out there who comfortably fit into that category.

      That's all. No ranting here. Now shoo, take your useful posts to another thread.

      Daltorak

  61. What this means for Playboy and Slashdot... by clyons · · Score: 1
    And I have, of course, no comment on what the sheer number of submissions must mean about our readers. *grin*

    I do. It mean that if they got Natalie Portman to do a nude spread, we might have a few less trolls on Slashdot due to the difficulty of typing with one hand.

    Hopefully this would be followed by a hardcore porno with Natalie and Jar-Jar involing the use of spoons. The title? "First Post." end troll.

    --

    --
    Intelligence is definitely a recessive trait.

  62. notice Gillain was Miss April '96? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many ./ers have offered to be her server administrator or to check her "hardware" for Y2K problems.

    :-)

  63. Definitely by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1
    That is the beauty of Linux - efficiency and scalability. 35 million lines of code in W2K? Yeesh!!

    What I liked most was Bob Young saying, "Would you buy a car with the hood welded shut?" Great stuff.

    1. Re:Definitely by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      You think the average Linux OS CD has less than 35M lines of code? Think again. BillG needs to start cracking that whip harder.

      (Of course not everything in a Linux distro is part of the OS, but that holds for Win2K also.)
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  64. Hey, that's not what they meant... by Penguin · · Score: 1

    It's all a mistake. The article read "Open Source", but it was meant to be about "Open intercourse"!

    --
    - Peter Brodersen; professional nerd
  65. Give me a break by Francisco+d'Aconia · · Score: 2

    So I set it up on an older but clean 200mhz Pentium, with a 1GB hard drive and 32MB of RAM. Seamless install, and boatloads of fun to muck around in.

    200MHz? 32MB RAM? Shit, even Windows 3.1 will run on that . If you're gonna test it, TEST IT. Load linux onto your power drill or something. :)

    I only read the article, honest (although that cleavage on the left was a little distracting).

    ---------
    Once in a while you get shown the light,

    --

    ---------
    Once in a while you get shown the light,
    In the strangest of places, when you look at it right -
    1. Re:Give me a break by Jonathan_S · · Score: 1

      Um, NT 4 will run on that. ( Didn't say it ran well or ran fast... ) Actually I'm typing this on a P166 64Meg of RAM runing NT4 SP6.0a (does that SP numbering worry you as much as it does me?) It only got the extra 32 megs of RAM last summer, before that it was NT4 SP3 running on 32 Megs. Made molasses look fast.

  66. Lack of software ? Where ?? by Oestergaard · · Score: 3

    I keep hearing that from everyone who doesn't actually use (GNU/)Linux... blablabla but it lacks software blablabla

    If I type in my shell, I get this question: "There are 1852 possibilities. Do you really wish to see them all? (y or n)" That's the number of single _programs_, or ``pieces of software'' that I have installed on a fairly standard desk-top developer machine.

    I recently started porting some software to NT, it's been four years since I used that OS last... After installing IE4 (required for VC), Visual C++ 6.0, MS Win32 SDK, (and in order not to lose my mind completely: Cygwin too), I fired up this huge IDE GUI development environment. Especially VC++ is something that Win developers claim Linux lacks. I simply cannot imagine why. Hang on:

    In order to do development on NT I depend on the IDE. If the IDE does not offer the combination of commands I wish to apply to my work, I'm shit out of luck. There's just no way to get boring repetitive work done easily, if it happens to not fit exactly into the provided dialog box. The IDE may be very nice, but it is _inherently_ limited because it has no way of executing scripts. It lacks a shell.

    On GNU/Linux, I run Emacs. For editing. Then I run bash for CLI. Then I run make to build. I use X with KDE to *integrate* these xterms and editors into one large IDE. In short: NT *has* an IDE, GNU/Linux with the standard tools *IS* an IDE.

    X+Emacs+GCC+Make+xterm+bash+... is quite a large program, if you look at all the parts as one. Anyone claiming that GNU/Linux is lacking software is someone who can't see the forest for trees.

    Granted, there may be a lack of integrated office suites. They should be just around the corner though. A lot of people won't need them though. Again, they limit you somehow. As an example: Work four people on a report using either Word or LaTeX+CVS. Assuming you actually _know_ a little word or a little LaTeX. LaTeX has no support for workgroups, CVS has no support for typesetting, but they both keep things simple and work on files, there you have your workgroup-aware typesetting tool.

    If you have to complain, say something clever. Like lack of huge but clumsy, limited, and hard-to-make-do-repetitive-work-for-you GUI applications.

  67. 3 words... by passion · · Score: 1

    click to enlarge...
    Are these the words of the future of Linux?

    --
    - passion
  68. Re:Lack of software ? Where ?? - correction by Oestergaard · · Score: 2

    "If I type in my shell"

    That should - of course - have read:

    "If I type TAB TAB in my shell"

    But Slashdot ate my < and >s because they weren't - eh.

  69. Minus One: Flaimbait by Stiletto · · Score: 2

    Oh pipe down and set your threshold at +5 if you can't take a little humor!
    ________________________________

  70. Q - "Do you read Playboy?" by MattXVI · · Score: 1

    A - "Yes, but just for the articles."

    --
    When I'm singing a ballad and a pair of underwear lands on my head, I hate that. It really kills the mood.
    -Tom Jones
  71. Linus in Playboy by ReadParse · · Score: 2
    I had a bet with a former coworker that Linux would be on the cover of Time magazine in 1999. Yeah, OK, it was premature. Definitely this year.

    Anyway, I would have NEVER in a million years guessed that his picture would be in Playboy... ever!

    I just think that's funny.

    I couldn't quite figure out if this article on "online only" or his picture will actually be in the print version. That would be WAY cool :)

    RP

  72. Anonymous Proxy by RuntimeError · · Score: 3
    Try https://www.rewebber.de

    It is a free anonymous encrypted proxy with the option of URL encryption.

    I had to use it to read the playboy article because JANET ( the sort of academic internet backbone of UK ) even soft porn is illegal.

    Anyway, considering that Linux was around for some 9 years, I think the author is a tad over excited about this "new" OS.

    1. Re:Anonymous Proxy by leitchn · · Score: 1

      Try https://www.rewebber.de It is a free anonymous encrypted proxy with the option of URL encryption.

      Amusingly enough, I'm blocked from that URL too!

    2. Re:Anonymous Proxy by fwad · · Score: 1

      Sadly - work also happens to block SSL azs well

      --
      -- Kernel Panic: Error reading /dev/caffeine
    3. Re:Anonymous Proxy by yerricde · · Score: 1

      Sadly - work also happens to block SSL azs well

      You may think SSL stands for secure server link or something similar, but it really stands for shopping site link, and work doesn't want employees shopping online on company time.

      just my 2c...

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
  73. And what might that be.... by FallLine · · Score: 2

    that geeks don't think about sex, and hence won't reproduce at sufficient numbers to sustain the geek population?

    I say slashdot needs to add porn, to remind geeks that they are, in fact men, encouraging them to do something besides waste their time on slashdot! heh

    I'm only kidding...sorta. =)

    1. Re:And what might that be.... by JackiePatti · · Score: 1
      I say slashdot needs to add porn, to remind geeks that they are, in fact men...

      Except in those cases when they are NOT men.

      --
      Jackie
      Geek-bitch-from-hell

  74. pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one here that thinks people who use the word "pr0n" should be dragged out into the street and shot?

  75. Slashdot awarded one-click porn patent by lars · · Score: 4

    TO BE RELEASED IMMEDIATELY

    HOLLAND, MI - Slashdot (www.slashdot.org), a popular web site focusing on IT-related news, has announced it was awarded a patent on "One-click porn" by the United States Patent Office. The technology, which allows world wide web surfers to access porn with a single mouse click was invented by Slashdot founder Rob Malda. Malda said the innovation was inspired by Amazon's one-click shopping technology. "When I saw how easy it was to patent an obvious technique that everyone uses, and then start suing everyone left and right, I couldn't resist," said Malda. "I am going to start by suing every site that links to porn. Soon I will be the king of the porn industry," he said, "I already rule the nerds, the intellect of the world, so this was the next logical step in my quest for World Domination(tm)."

    He continued, "And besides, what better way could there be to make SHITLOADS of money than having banner ads for porn sites on a site that millions of horny, teenaged, sex-starved nerds visit EVERY DAY!" Asked if the pro-open-source Slashdot community would accept the idea of Slashdot owning patents, Malda responded "You don't think I've thought of that already? What people really don't know is that RMS is a recovering porn addict. I will soon own him and then I can tell him to tell everyone patents are good. Everyone will listen to RMS. I also plan to form a porn division within Slashdot called 'GNU/pr0n' which RMS will head. That should keep him happy and ensure I have control over him. I'm no fool."

    Officials from Andover.net (Nasdaq: ANDN), which recently acquired Slashdot were mum about the technology. When asked how one-click porn fit into their future plans, the company released a statement only saying "our patented one-click porn technology is Linux-based, and as you can tell from the success Linux has had in the past year, it is clearly the Next Big Thing(tm). Therefore, you should all invest in lots and lots of Andover stock."

    Slashdot also has patents pending on the technology in 18 other countries.

    1. Re:Slashdot awarded one-click porn patent by Ashen · · Score: 2

      I think ascii porn will need to be included for the lynx audience. =P

    2. Re:Slashdot awarded one-click porn patent by Kristopher+Johnson · · Score: 1
      I have a patent pending on the state of arousal that results from looking at porn on the Internet. This was the result of years of research on my part.

      Start sending those licensing fees.

  76. RMS in Playboy by Hobart · · Score: 1

    This is exactly what I was thinking.

    If Verne "Mini-Me" Troyer can make it into a many-page pictoral for Christmas as "Mini-Hef" ...

    ...why can't we have "St IGNUcius' Happy Happy hacking run"?

    Starring the girls of the mansion as the The Techno-Talking Babes(TM)?

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  77. Free software, free... by Bob-K · · Score: 1

    Ah, he probably just wrote a good review of Linux because somebody gave him a free copy.

    Hey, if /. writes a good review of Playboy, maybe they'll give you a free....

    Oh, never mind.

  78. All right... by Quidam · · Score: 1

    Who's going to be the first to admit they actually read the article.... -Q

  79. new meaning by madmancarman · · Score: 1

    Linux appearing in Playboy may give new meaning to the term "Open Source"....

    --
    First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
  80. But porn only encourages... by talonyx · · Score: 1

    people go get out their meat and start beating it. And we don't want people to think that's what geeks do, becuase we Don't... right? So be proud! Find a hot chick using GnomeICU, and then meet her. She'll be just as ugly as you thought she was, and you'll be dissappointed. Conclusion: Get your nose back in the code, it's better there :)

    1. Re:But porn only encourages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about, get your nose in a bar or club, or some other social atmosphere. You can only code so much, before your social skills begin to wither into oblivion. Every coder is in a non-stop battle, conciously or subconciously. Sometimes you just have to get your ass out of your seat and do something else... like Ski at Jackson Hole, WY for a week without a computer... those are the breaks...

    2. Re:But porn only encourages... by TGR · · Score: 1
      Er, bars? right, that's social, having guys puke all over your shoes and steal anybody you even vaguely think about to hitting on :)

      No, code doesn't leave nasty white acidic stains on your dress... stay with the code :)

      -m

      99 little bugs in the code,
      99 bugs in the code,
      fix one bug, compile it again...

      --

      Voting Moo Anyway!
  81. Nice article, but not much for guts by xtal · · Score: 2

    This is a great article, I mean, is getting mentioned in Playboy our generation's version of getting mentioned in time? Will this bring about a new crop of playboy models that are right at home with an xterm, vi, and routing tables? (well, I can hope, (that my gf doesn't read this :).

    Did anyone actually read the article though? There is nothing new here, and it has some FUD. Not enough software? Are you kidding me? There's so much software for linux that I've actually been out of the warez scene so long I don't have any contacts anymore! :) Staroffice, Abi, not to mention the tomes at Freshmeat and Gnome.org. Maybe they meant lack of commmercial software.

    I don't know what to critque, mainly because I don't know how technical playboy is supposed to be.. The models aren't really photographed in detail enough to be an anatomy lesson, either :).

    Excellent publicity. Too bad about that last paragraph though. No mention of the gaming support for linux coming about, and there was no mention of the current achilles heel of linux - getting cutting edge hardware suppored. (USB devices, sound cards, 3D cards, etc.)

    All in time though. How about some models in copyleft shirts? :)

    kudos!

    --
    ..don't panic
  82. It's more than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Playboy is an INSTITUTION in the US.

    Aside from the heavily airbrushed softcore, they have an amazing staff of writers and journalists.

    Not to mention a distribution in the MILLIONS!!!!

    So, even people who have never owned a computer will know about Linux and how much better it is than Windows (for certain applications and situations at the present time).

    Damn, it's so easy to use, even a CENTERFOLD gets excited over it.

    Hey!!!!!!!

    The next time anyone writes an article about how hard Linux is to learn and how it didn't recognize their peripherals, we can just link them to this article.

    How many macho computer "professionals" (mostly male) will want to admit that they have a harder time with Linux than a woman primarily known for removing her clothes?

    Of course, she probably has TWICE the IQ of most of those "professionals" anyway.

    :)

    2000 looks to be a VERY good year, already.

    PS: do we start sending 12" plush Tux's to the mansion yet?

    1. Re:It's more than that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... I would sure want to send 12" of something to that mansion, but it wouldn't be a plush Tux.

  83. Re: Happens to me too by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    I submitted this on December 7th, 1999... Methinks that was a large amount of seconds from the January 4th, 2000 ..

    Well, someday I'll get a story submission posted :-)
    ---

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  84. Re:Clearing my sig up Drop the d in hundred!! by firstnevyn · · Score: 1

    Its all in the sig to further cement this bastard dialect the "d" should be droped from the hundred to make hunred so it would be two hunred and foty dollar's worth of puddin'

  85. Oh man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The FreeBSD guys are gonna be really jealous now... :-)

  86. You forgot... by Midnight+Coder · · Score: 1

    8. Grits boy
    9. Beowulf cluster
    10. Last Post

    (I don't find any of these people funny BTW).

  87. MODERATE UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Informative"

  88. Plinux by kevlar · · Score: 1

    Breasts, Linux and a boat-load of know-how.

  89. and also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    opensourceman LiNuXMaN Jesus Christ Man

  90. For those unable to access the site ... by Mr+Donkey · · Score: 1

    for surfing enforcement reasons, Use: http://i-security.addr.com

    Here is a direct link to the article:

    http://i-security.addr.com/cgi-bin/nph-a.cgi/http/ www.playboy.com/digital/gillian/

    --
    -----Transmission Complete----- If you want to email me...Don't
  91. mmm by LinuxFreak12 · · Score: 0

    hmmm....*GRIN*

  92. No Bloatware Here by grantdh · · Score: 2

    Well, at least with Playboy on the Linux side there won't be any bloatware on display :)

    --

    I left my body to science, but I'm afraid they've turned it down...
  93. You know you've made it when... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    You know you've made it when you're in the 'sticky pages.'

    Why do I get the feeling its sandwiched between an ad for penis enlargement and '101 ways to pick up chicks fast!'

  94. Re:Here they come (MODERATE THIS UP!!) by dithi · · Score: 1

    8. MODERATE THIS UP!
    9. Natalie Portman
    10. I know this is offtopic but...

    --
    I am that that is, not that that is not, that is.
  95. Nothing new by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    Whats the big deal, this isn't the first time something with Linux on it is soon gonna have some jizz all over it.


    OT: I love this new brand of moderation. Its like Billy Graham at the controls - anything dirty, explicit, or god forgive us: a dissenting opinion, or a criticism about geek culture automaticaly gets knocked down at least one.

    Slashdot: where no-thought fundies rule.

  96. HOT Stuff Linus & Sex by danab · · Score: 1

    Sex should always be Hot and that's what LINUX is. WOW. Something you can have control of. You can design to be on top or below. I may be MAC user and web designer(sometimes using PCs as a consultant)...but being able to have some control and having a sense of contribution to a global project rocks...Even though I haven't been involved I think it's cool.

  97. Dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have problems that only BEGIN with the message above.

    I think the Matrix has you. :-(

  98. Porsche... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...seems to be having no trouble selling all the Boxsters it can make.

    "Would you buy a car with the hood welded shut?"

  99. God save the Penguin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    A woman Playboy writer discovers Linux. Oh boy, this OS is stone cold ruined now.

    Soon we'll be overrun by an army of elitist snobby assed supermodel playmates. Very soon these beach blonde bitches and their attendant drooling geek wannabes and biff clones will swarm into the community and start destroying everything with their baywatch commercialization and utter disrespect of the ethics and programmer geeks that made Linux great.

    Stallman, Cox, hop thru the portal now, dudes. The timequake paradox is in full effect. Force infinity. This is truly the end of the beginning.

    You people will seriously and tearfully rue the very day that 'Virtually Gillian' discovered your OS. Trust me.

  100. playboy women as techno gurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    that's about as sensible as

    Lawyers and politicians teaching ethics in college
    Rush Limbaugh as head of the ACLU
    Hitler penning for the Anti Defamation League
    David Duke speaking at the NAACP
    Fidel Castro as editor of the Wall Street Journal
    Bill Clinton doing a column on family values


    Which is to say I'd take a Playboy article like 'Virtually Gillian' as seriously as I would Newt Gingrich doing a column on the evils of divorce.

    1. Re:playboy women as techno gurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gingrinch as marriage counselor. lol. that was good.

      personally I want to see Gillian answer that challenge and take thatr guy on and talk hard core shop. I know he's gonna rip her to pieces before the conversation gets off the ground.

      Mr. Stone Cold: Now, Gillian, tell me your opinion about the ramifications of releasing Linux under the GPL.
      Virtually Gillian: Uhhhhhhh....... the GPL? Isn't that the thing that tracks my car so I don't get, like, lost?
      (chat room dissolves into riotous laughter and the number of asthma cases skyrockets across the world)

      She is going to mother fucking DIE if she takes that challenge. I give it ten lines of chat at best, including the salutations.

      We DEFINITELY need a bookie for this one.

  101. Rule #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never... EVER... trust a woman from Playboy who tries to sound knowledgeable about technology issues. She didn't fucking suffer the hard knocks of geekdom, she doesn't belong. Plain and simple.

    1. Re:Rule #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd listen to that Dianora chick on IRC before I listened to some silicon enhanced hot air balloon for brains chick on playboy. werd up.

  102. I HEAR YA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    double werd up on that brudda. I like pretty chicks as much as the next person but don't fucking try and scam me with this 'playboy chick duz technology' bullshit. I can guarantee you she wrote that article with a seriously heavy dollop of help from someone with a real clue about Linux. There is no way in hell no woman from Playboy could even spell Linux, much less install it. No doubt this will get a bunch of clueless linux geeks to sign up for a subscription to playboy to hear more about linux. Stupid fucking tools. I bet they fucking whack off on those pictures too. HEY IDIOTS DON'T YOU GET IT? Those women are all plastic! Their tits are fake, their pictures are all AIRBRUSHED to hide their blemishes. You know how much they paid for liposuction? Jeez louise, admire some real women for a change. If Winona Ryder did an article on Linux I'd read it and probably feel comfortable with believing it. At least she FUCKING LOOKS REAL!!

  103. HEY GILLIAN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I heard you read slashdot.

    Well, take notice. I ain't buying your phoney baloney bullshit. I know for a fact you wrote that Linux article with the help of someone else who actually knew what they were dealing with.

    You're like the cheerleader who turns to the geek in the cafeteria and hires him to do her math homework. "I could just feel the power under the hood of this slick and efficient interface." Bitch, you did not write that yourself. You know it and I know it. Please. I gotta hand it to you though. You managed to scam a bunch of horny net geek lemmings into thinking you're the big busty babe playmate cum technology clueblondeshell heroine here to save their day.

    But I ain't fooled by your bullshit. You're nothing but a silicon filled liposucked construct trying to scam the geek community into subscribing to your bevy of airbrushed over dispassionate looking human mannequins you call playmates. Who's gonna read the stinking articles when you have all that flesh on the next page? Gimme a break. If I want great articles I'll read Scientific American or any computer magazine without Dvorak as an editorial writer. If I wanna see pussy I'll lift my geek girlfriend's skirt and chow down. If I wanna look at the latest in fauxfemme design, I'll pick up your mag.

    How about this. I challenge you to get on a chat room, and I'll be there, and I'll grill your surgically enhanced ass like a T-bone on a barbecue pit. And you better not bring that hired geek you use to help you write those articles, either.

    Deal?

    1. Re:HEY GILLIAN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh my god that was the most absolutely positively stone cold dis I have ever read in all my 30 years of life. It took balls the size of jupiter to post that. I am not even worthy to read it! man I sure hope you can take her to the cleaners face to face. That would be the coup of the centry. A geek man throws down the guantlets and hauls a playmate off to SMACKDOWN CITY!! hot damn!!! School is definitely in session!

  104. god save the geek girl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Kudos to the real geek women who did the time and made the sacrifices, unlike this glossed up konstruct pontifikator of issues technological.
    Virtual Gillian is nothing more than a regurgitator of other people's wisdoms, experiences and discoveries in the tech community. She lets all the other smart people do all the work and all the discovery, then she plagiarizes their knowledge for her articles. A truer example of a phoney ass is a rare find indeed.

    And yes, women like this look down on the frazzle haired, Dew and Jolt-drinking geeks who spent hours and days on end hacking the Linux kernel and coding the attendant apps that made the surrounding OS. They laugh at the little stupid uneducated ignorant stereotypical wisecracks about how geeks don't shower and how they don't have social skills (as she defines it), etc. That phoneyfuck bitch wouldn't last ten seconds doing the real leg work to understand Linux, much less figure out how to code an app.

    I bet I could throw her in a tailspin with three words:

    P
    H
    P

    easy cheesy one two threesy. now bitch shut the fuck up and go back to talking about what you know best, namely the casting couch.

    1. Re:god save the geek girl! by Corrinne+Yu · · Score: 1

      Sorry you AC had to take so much abuse from the response.

      So I play devil's advocate and thank you.

      Thank you for supporting the real geek women like us who did the time and made the sacrifices.

      I am not going to name names, but I have witnessed many "glamourous women" let all the smart people do all the work and all the discovery, and plagiarize their knowledge. She/They call it "delegating" the "research." Then she/they slap a fancy title of themselves and claim to have "led" this.

      But don't fool yourselves.

      "Glamourous men" also do the same thing. You just don't know about them because they are not as obvious.

      I don't have enough knowledge to verify your assessment of g.

      I do appreciate you sticking up for real geek women like us.


      Corrinne Yu
      3D Game Engine Programmer

  105. professional brutality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the United Nations has hung men for fewer atrocities than I've seen here :) I can't even begin to touch the flames you guys have been hurling at Gillian...damnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn... are you the new breed of troops in the battle of the sexes or something? if Gillian sees this and she shoots back oh my god I would pay good money to see the exchange oh my god oh my god would I pay to see this. Clash of the megatitans coming to pay per view

    1. Re:professional brutality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dats' right bro. this shit's on full blast hard core. we gonna punk gillian's ass wit da WU TANG STYLE BAYBEEEEEEEE

  106. Slashdot Interview with Gillian! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If she's really a slashdot fan, then she'll be delighted to find her article mentioned here. Can we please get a slashdot interview with her??? 8-)

  107. the ultimate irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be if Dianora@IRC was the one who did the deed. Or: Welcome to Gib City. Population: 2. Mayor: Dianora. Peon: Gillian.

  108. more questions that would stump Gillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Gillian: um, tell us your opinion about the benefits that kernel modules bring to the Linux operating system. Dear Gillian: Why does Richard Stallman warn against the use of .gif's on a website? Dear Gillian: What's the difference between the GPL and the LGPL? Dear Gillian: What is your opinion on the KDE vs GNOME debate? Dear Gillian: Tell us about how you can get a winmodem working in Linux. (heh, trick question.) Dear Gillian: QUICK! What does GNU stand for?? Dear Gillian: QUICK! What inspired the use of the name "Linux"? Dear Gillian: I heard you can control fireworks with Linux. What say we test this X10 stuff in your living room? Dear Gillian: PSST. I heard it's 'free' as in free beer. Down the hall to your left. Watch that last step. It's a looloo!

  109. I got one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    hey gillian what OS did you write that article in?

    (booyeah!!)

  110. gillian doesn't look down on geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    after all she wants their subscription money
    :)

  111. gillian is gonna be pissssssssed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    man she is gonna do a Mt. St. Helens when she sees this thread! Gawd dang fear the wrath of a woman scorned!

  112. hah. nigga please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bring it on baby. gillian you bring the angry volcano I'll bring the fuckin mile long comet and we'll see who duz da most urban renewal hahahah she won't dare stick her nose into this nest of hornets she knows better. her [phoney ass will get spanked and she will be showed up as the original redheaded stepchild of the intrnet guaranteed

  113. yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and if she humiliates him the whole world's gonna laugh

  114. holy brick filled gauntlets, batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gillian aint gonna take this challenge. not after that colossal facial rearranging smack you gave her. no way in hell. she's smart enough not to talk shop one on one with someone who knows what they're talking about.

  115. you mean she's a coward? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    whodathunkit!

  116. you guys post like you ain't been laid in years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.

  117. dont sing it. bring it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let her come at me with that 'wrath of a woman scorned' bullshit. any time any place. she's a silicon phoney and she's getting called on it. she'll be a ball of rice paper flying into a fucking supernova.

    and i am the supernova.

  118. Unusual praise for Playboy by vaxer · · Score: 1

    This may be the first time Playboy has praised something for going down on you *less* often...

  119. What that flipper fella! by Mai+Longdong · · Score: 1

    Here's one of Tux's cousins playin' around....I guess herring is good for you!

    http://www.rochellewest.com/portfolio/4rw0874.jp g

  120. Humor points? Re:Wow. Naked women AND a first pos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, this deserves at least a little humor consideration. The ONE context I've ever seen on Slashdot where Naked and Petrified Natalie Portman was even distantly relevant...

    It's a first!

  121. Imagine your boss ... by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 2

    saying in a meeting "I read that article about Linux in Playboy" ...

  122. Implications for Kernel 2.4 by Ex+Machina · · Score: 2

    Perhaps we could add a kernel level JPEG decompression system to go with our kernel http. So now we can serve and view porn faster than everyone else.

  123. Re:porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you want us to drag you out into the street and shoot you?

  124. Get over it (OFF-TOPIC) by DragonHawk · · Score: 2

    Sigh. I wish people would let me know why they reject things.

    To put it bluntly: Get over it.

    You submitted a suggestion for a story. The idea is to send ideas to the Slashdot crew, not to boost your ego by putting your email address in a mailto: link on Slashdot's homepage. It isn't like you didn't get your pay check or someone stole your hard drive.

    As for why: Maybe Rob saw it and didn't like it, but Jeff did. Maybe there were too many stories that week. Maybe the reviewer was just tired. Of all the things in the world to get worked up over, this has got to be one of the silliest.

    As an aside: This gets "+1 Insightful"?

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  125. Don't be so quick and harsh on Gillian by georgeha · · Score: 1

    Which is to say I'd take a Playboy article like 'Virtually Gillian' as seriously as I would Newt Gingrich doing a column on the evils of divorce.

    I only read the article posted at i-security, but she doesn't seem like a total Potemkin airheaded wanna-be-geek babe. Heck, she even mentions USENET, she must have half a clue.

    The vitriol I see here against attractive women is dismaying, too many AC's seem to assume that if a woman is attractive, she's ignorant. I do believe there's a classical Greek term for that, the modern translation is sour grapes.

    And speaking of porn babes that are clued about Linux, I recall an old Slashdot story about a female porn star who uses Linux, though I can't find the story anymore. I believe it was Asia Carrera.

    George

    1. Re:Don't be so quick and harsh on Gillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vitriol I see here against attractive women is dismaying, too many AC's seem to assume that if a woman is attractive, she's ignorant. I do believe there's a classical Greek term for that, the modern translation is sour grapes.

      yeah bvut 1) playboy playmates aren't attractive. we all know their imperfections are airbrushed over. Most of these women undergo heavy bodily modification surgery. What's so attractive about that? 2) the odds of a supermodel having a clue about computers is so low that I will not lose money betting against them as a whole. there's always 1 or 2 lumps one gets when betting but the other 98-99 right guesses will more than make up for it. And it isn't sour grapes. I know she has no respect for the thick spectacle wearing ubergeniuses who made the net what it is now. She wouldn't spit on them if they were on fire. She's not fit to commentate on this culture. Not even close.

  126. Chase Manhattan by G27+Radio · · Score: 2


    Access to this Internet site is not authorized through
    Chase's computers, gateways or systems. All Chase
    users are reminded that they may use the Internet
    through Chase's computers, gateways and systems solely
    for Chase business purposes and that Chase
    may monitor Chase users' activity on the Internet. Please
    see Information Technology Policy 11 and the Chase
    Code of Conduct in that regard.

    If you have a business need to have a web site blocked or
    unblocked please complete the Block/Unblock Request
    Form.

    For further information please see the DIA Technology
    Bulletin in E-Line.


    Dear DIA Technology Person:

    I am currently researching the Linux operating system and other open source software. I'm sure it will play an important role in the future of your company as well as our other clients. Please unblock www.playboy.com so I may continue to provide my best efforts in supporting your company.

    Thanks in advance,

    numb

    ...if that doesn't work, well, there's always the shiva client :P

  127. technical resource by prsabc · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that playboy can be a business expense?

  128. Re:Clearing my sig up Drop the d in hundred!! by cheese63 · · Score: 1

    good call, i'm always open to good ideas

  129. Re:Tuxware *is* Bloatware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What the hell does 'asquerous' mean?

    read: select "select individual packages" and specify services to start on boot.

    How is BSD "trimmer?"

    The word `asquerous' derives from the Spanish asqueroso , which in turn derives from the vulgar Latin escharosus ("scabby"), which in turn derives from Latin escharsis ("cicatrization") and eschara , a scab; as you can plainly see from the chi, all ultimately derive from the Greek. It means `icky', `gross', `disgusting', 'nauseating', et cetera. As you've doubtless surmised, it's not complimentary. In fact, it's principally used despectively.

    As for selecting individual packages, that depends upon which O/S you've got, and how much patience. Many Linuces come pre-installed with far more than you could imagine wanting. It's huge and disorganized. I'm talking about the hardware that ships with some Linux O/S already on it, like VA. But if you pop in a RedHat or SuSE installation CD, you'll have the same issues. Whether you pick `workstation' or `server' (silly nomenclatures) from RedHat, you'll get unending dreck and dross to fill your filesystem and befuddle your users.

    Now, take an OpenBSD installation CD. Now do the same thing: a complete installation. When you're done, look around. Compare how much got installed from a standard Redhat installation. Do an ls /bin /usr/bin /sbin /usr/sbin on both systems and look at the difference.

    Here, I'll do it for you:

    bsd$ for d in /bin /usr/bin /sbin /usr/sbin; do
    > echo -n "$d "
    > ls $d | wc -l
    > done
    /bin 40
    /usr/bin 363
    /sbin 80
    /usr/sbin 171

    linux$ for d in /bin /usr/bin /sbin /usr/sbin; do
    > echo -n "$d "
    > ls $d | wc -l
    > done
    /bin 94
    /usr/bin 1425
    /sbin 127
    /usr/sbin 182

    It gets even worse:
    bsd$ ls -R /etc | wc -l
    174

    linux$ ls -R /etc | wc -l
    1263

    I trust that it is now patently obvious precisely what I meant by "Linux bloatware" and how BSD is "trimmer". There's a lot more than this, but you get the idea. Linux has become unmanagebly huge. The difference is astonishing.

    Finding your way around a Redhat /etc directory is an exercise in an unholy labyrinth designed by Borges and implemented by Escher. Go not down that inexorable path to administrative madness.

    linux$ touch "/etc/Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate!"
  130. Honest, I just get Slashdot for the articles! by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    My wife will never believe me.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  131. Huh.... Did someone say Sesame Street?? by Ricter · · Score: 0

    The monkey man would like to smile upon you today but you seem to have absolutely no cheese whatsoever. Thats too bad. I never really liked you anyways, but if I did, I swear I'd kill that little platypus. Imagine it. I bet he wouldn't even have a clue. I'd probably stuff his pants with ex-lax.... just to tick the little guy off.

    Unfortunately, I dont like you and therefore dont care enough about you to kill an innocent monkey. Why oh why aren't you here?

    The boredom is arresting. My poop swells with fear that I may die of boredom and get stuck in an infinte loop... one, not filled with happiness, but with desparation, and diarrhea.

    Thats right. Feel it. I know you want to. I saw you looking at it from across the room. It might be small, but its about the greatest mouse in the world. Go ahead, now, its ok. You can touch it. I just cleaned his ball. He has been a naughty little pointer...

    WHAT IS THIS?????????

    A tiger? A FREAKING HUGE CAT????? its just like that damned pig!

    BAAAAAAAAH

    Take this tiger. Put it in your mouth

    Spit it out.

    Run around naked.

    got to poop.

    This cheese you so oddly speak of is not here. Your constant blather about cheese is the sole cause of my undying haterd towards you. The multicolored Lumberjacks of the Yule only infuriated my wrath all the more! Ah yes! It is time for you to eat. Eat! Eat! Eat! Hahaha....Fly Fatass Fly!

    The Sputtering of nonsense from either oriface seems to be a strong point of yours...

    --Ahh, Yes, said the lemur.... but whose smells none the better?

    It was the cow of course

    "Moooooo Said the cow"

    But where did he go?

    In the poop room of course. Where else do mad cows go?

    'It's obvious to me' said the the three legged Dingo, 'that the sheer stupidity of your bretheren the Mad Cow would drive him to the outer edges of Madame Montego's montage.'

    'Aaahhhhh!!! Get those Damn Lumberjacks away from me!!'

    And Ryusonuke Speaks....

    Whom are these so called 'lumber-jacks'???

    What do they do? Where are they? AND WHY THE HELL DO THEY KEEP MOVING AROUND???

    I believe it was richard nixon (so called, 'Tricky Dick') whom said "What is that noise coming from the front of your pants????"

    He further elaborated that the noise sounded like someone laughing, but it came directly from the front of the man's pants.

    The question is, who's pants were they?

    The real question today isn't whose pants they are, but why is it that the pants remind me so of my days in gentle mountains of Zimbabwe? Ah yes I remember those far gone days, It seems like just yesterday....



    I Like to play with tuna fish in the sand box while I run around in the sandy shore of mountainous of Zimbabwe.



    Ahh, yes my freind. That was a good memory. I, too, enjoyed the smell of wet fish in the morning and the feeling of sand in my underpants.

    My balls are wet.

    Lacross is fun.

    Yes I remember that Little boy Masoto, he was a cunning little lad, or was he a penguin I met at the flea market?

    Ah well It matters not.

    Back on the subjet of odd pants noise... Here's Ryusonuke.

    What can you tell us today Mr. Ryusonuke?

    Well, As I understand it The Lumberjacks cut down trees because they can.

    Thank you.

    The misty morning marigolds make money manufafacturing mass mailing moo goo gi pan mainly to mongolians.

    Tetsuse here to elaborate more upon the pants noise:

    I was once a correspondant with the Russian Government, with which Comrade "Tricky Dick". He told me that he found it to be "extremely pleasurable for someone to put him in a bathtub full of ice water while someone pours an entire bowl of hot grits (no cheese, thank you) down his trousers.


    Why?

    Because we love you.

    Ah, and now the real subjet rears it's ugly oatmeal coated appedages....

    It behooves( and I mean all four hooves) me to explain to everyone the proper usage of "grits".

    The undeniably pleasurable experience of grits down ones pants is a special experience to be shared on special occasions, for example Kwanzaa. And it should only be done with one who is loved by all the people of the world, not like "Tricky Dick". Now someone more like Harry Belofonte....yup.

    That is all.

    --

    Thats it???

    Thats all you can offer when I payed HOW MANY??? Four hard earned American Dollars???

    You are a sorry excuse for an Albanian, and surely a crook whom has no business dealing with the said lumberjacks because you cant even keep the grits out of your pants for more than the time it takes you to make another bowl.

    Where oh where has my little gecko gone? Of all the sick things.....

    I mean, how small was that guy? Jeez, I hope Mr. Happy didn't eat him. Mr. Happy is really mean for such a fuzzy little gerbil.

    Oh thats evil, Ryusonuke! Pouring hot grits down your pants is one thing, but drowning gerbils in it, oh, thats just insane, damnit.

    Yeah yeah, thats right, you can take that QWERTY thing and shove it up your buttocks. I'll take my DVORAK everywhere i go, thank you very much.

    Nonsense nonsense nonsense. You are not a very passionate bird. Nowhere near as loveable as the Penguin under my bed. More like the toucan I scoff at every day.

    "I scoff at you" I tell the toucan. Fucking cereal peddler. I never really liked cereal since they got rid of beef flavored oatmeal scented butterflakes.

    I don't get it, was I the only person in the world whom enjoyed them as much as the rather insane Ryusonuke enjoys pouring grits down his pants, or bathing in hot buttered popcorn??

    The world may never know. But we do know how many licks it takes to eat an entire stick of butter.

    What i want to know is why peanut butter doesnt come in sticks like regular butter.

    I think its a good idea.

    No tengo ningún sentido del olor porque hay demasiado queso.

    Por qué hay tan muchos cerdos pero ningunos albaneses?


    Donde está la carne de vaca

    I think that is the question on everyone's mind

    And now those famous words from Baron Wolfgang Von Strohiem:

    "Ich wünsche Ihren kranken fated Unsinn Teil meiner Lebensdauer nicht werden, ich mich fühle jedoch, daß Ihr Punkt auf dem mesozoischen Lebensstil gut zum Tagwetter entsprochen wird."

    Thats the end of the show for tonite kiddies, but tomorrow they'll be two more showings at ten and at two, so please bring peanut butter.

    I don't know what your talking about. The woman with the whip said I was bad bad bad....oh yeah I like that you know... What no! What do you think I'm talking about you pervert?!

    "Das strangeness Ihrer unteren Seite unterhält mich"

    Strangeness of your lower page maintains me!!

    'Weep, Weep!', spat the overly exasperated chibi bird, "I have no one to throw parcheze at."

    Why does Kneel never open this damn nonsense pad...I can't spout nonsense alone!!!!!

    some things to keep in mind include the fact that you shouldnt starch your knickers.

    russians are fun but stay away from the ones who have white stuff on their nose.

    el pequeño hombre preguntó al dios no dejó las heces fuera de sus pantalones

    Rubber bands dont taste good. You shouldnt eat them unless youre really hungry or really stupid. Like Ryusonnuke... one time that moron ate a whole bunch of american french fries which had been rotting on the floorboard of my japanese car for many many moons (i hadnt eaten mcdonalds in 6 months so i guess you can figure out how old they were).

    Mmm but the smell of cheese in the air is invigoratingly erotic this time of year. my nipples are expanding as we speak.

  132. You have no idea what you're talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You admit to having last used Visual C four years ago, except for your recent foray, so perhaps you can be forgiven for not realizing that it has changed significantly. This does mean, however, that you cannot be using it to its full potential. I use Linux, as well as Windows, Irix and Solaris. This doesn't mean, though, that I am blinded to Linux's current deficiencies. Instead of admitting current realities, and supporting efforts to counter Windows' advantages - eg slick development tools - you stick your head in the sand, and try to pretend they aren't needed. This hinders rather helps the Linux cause. Let me point out a few things: 1) Visual Studio DOES offer scripting facilities. Your contention 'it has no way of executing scripts' is plain wrong. 2) Manual editing of makefiles cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, be considered as convenient as the visual project editing available in Visual C, or any other modern IDE. Newer tools under Linux, like KDevelop appear to be addressing this, but your archaic combination of Emacs and Make simply don't cut it. As far as dismissing Visual Studio as 'huge', I can think of no better example of over-engineered bloatware than Emacs itself - it hardly meets the small and focused ideal of the Unix philosophy. 4) The editing/debugging interface in Visual Studio is markedly superior to Emacs, in my view. Where, for instance, is the equivalent of the 'intellisense' technology that shows you struct/class members as you type statements? 3) GCC, even in its latest incarnations (EGCS, whatever), generates significantly slower code than Visual C. I have usually found the code I write runs 30% slower when compiled with gcc, and even the latest, flakiest version of egcs makes scarcely any difference. The performance differential may not be as great in some applications, but Visual C's optimizer consistently beats gcc. This is without mentioning the fact that many builds can't even compile the kernel reliably. 4) Virtually all graphical applications suffer due to Linux's still abysmal graphics support. Specifically, whilst some (notably ATI) OpenGl drivers are coming along very well, several major cards have no accelerated support, and those that are accelerated generally exhibit far poorer performance under Linux (e.g. NVIDIA). X's 2D acceleration support is also far behind that of Windows. This IS changing, but at the present time, Windows wins by a long margin on graphics applications. Games support is woefully lacking - Quake 3 and Unreal Tournemant, whilst nice, don't quite compare to the shelves full of Windows-only games. I am not solely talking of games, however, or even Windows, though - 3D apps., long available under Irix, are now better supported under Windows than Linux. 5) Your example of the shell reporting 1852 possibilities is meaningless. Of these 1852 virtually none of them is directly comparable to anything available to a Windows user. Comparing LaTeX to Word is stupid - they aren't trying to achieve the same thing at all. How many times is the average user writing a report with three other people? Or the sort of technical work that really benefits from the typesetting abilities of LaTeX? Not as often as they are writing something is more easily produced in Word.

    1. Re:You have no idea what you're talking about by gavinhall · · Score: 1

      Posted by cookieman.k:

      Hi AC! You have some good points (ex: VC editor) but the debugger crash faster than the NT itself. The wizards are useles I'm not that lazy to write some file on my own. You say that graphics aplication and games are all over the place in Win world but the DirectX scheme of programing 3D (or else) was designed by a masochist. MSDN is good but do not count on the API because half of MSDN is bug recognition/workaround. The DSP file itself is very cute until something scrues some little thing in itt and after that you can say goodby to the project. I will not mention that the space needed for all these API/GUI/whatever is huge. My 8Gb disk is full of this crap. Long life Kdevelop! Happy coding! don't complain about my spelling ... Greets:

    2. Re:You have no idea what you're talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank you for you comments. You are right that DirectX has been, and still is to a lesser extent, a terrible API, BUT you can simply use OpenGl. Sadly this is still far better supported under Windows. Microsoft don't like game developers using OpenGl, and seem to be refusing to develop it further (for example multiple monitor support requires an API update, but none is forthcoming), so Linux could catch up, and _surpass_ Windows support, but right now, the support's awful. How can I work under Linux when the NVIDIA OpenGl driver runs at half the rate of the Windows one?

      You comment about the DSP file boils down to 'it's a binary file'. That would seem to be a bad decision if you care about being able to repair it when things go wrong, but there are always backups, you know.

  133. HA HA by anative · · Score: 1

    The weird thing is I keep running into old friends via slashdot, Gillian used to be my Co-op at Ringling school of Art and Design about 6 years ago!

  134. Debian = a good p0rn star name? by Great+Gatsby · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or would Debian make a great name for a porn "actress"?

    --
    404 File Not Found The requested .sig was not found on this server.
  135. Stallman on garbage by anonymous+cowerd · · Score: 1

    There's a funny quote in there from Richard Stallman: "If you want people to take out the garbage, you have to pay them. You don't have to do that to get people to program. The excitement of advancing the technology is what drives hackers."

    You know, I have the highest respect and admiration for Stallman, but I sure think he's got that dead wrong. I mean, no one pays me to take out the garbage, I do it voluntarily for free. The alternative, after all, is to leave it to pile up and pile up until you can't even force your way in the front door any more. (Every now and then you read about some recluse who does just that, and how does everyone describe such a person? They say, "He's nuts!")

    Why would Stallman - Stallman of all people! - make an error like that? Because the ideologists of capitalism has so deliberately and single-mindedly infected our way of thinking that it's practically unimaginable to imagine that people do anything at all without the incentive of a profit. Why, there are many people to whom, for example, the notion of altruism, or even social cooperation, is as alien and inconceivable as the idea of an existing supernatural deity is to an lifelong atheist; they simply can not fit their minds around such an idea.

    And yet practically everybody does things without the incentive of a profit every day. I mean, can you imagine feeding your children, or drinking a glass of beer, or listening to music? Of course you can, it's to do things like that that one works and accumulates money; yet where's the financial profit in doing those things?

    Yours WDK - WKiernan@concentric.net

    1. Re:Stallman on garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thinks he mean "garbage man" maaan, not yous who takes da garbage to da door.

  136. Grow up, loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PHP? I don't know what the hell that is. I've only heard the name before and my guess is it's some tool for doing web stuff. But since I don't know what it is, I guess that makes ME completely unqualified to say anything about Linux, or call myself a geek, right? I most certainly couldn't "figure out how to code an app", right? Never mind that I do quite well as a software engineer and have a nice resume. You MUST be some clueless, inexperienced 14 year-old if you think this PHP thing has anything to do with Linux. You're probably one of the same morons who thinks they're 31337 because they know Perl. But I digress.

    All you kids who are responding to this thread need to get a life and grow up. Maybe Gillian does know something about Linux, maybe she doesn't - who cares? She certainly seems to know at least as much about Linux than the people who write for the typical mainstream computer rags. So why the flames? What's the difference? The only one I can see is that she's a beautiful person. Well shit, just because someone has good looks doesn't mean they're any better than you, or that they have a better life than you, nor does it mean they look down at you or anyone else. I don't know where you people get this jaded, immature view of life. The way you are looking down on and stereotyping these models is just as bad as people who stereotype all geeks.

    I think it is very refreshing to see celebrities that are geeks (or at least appear to be). The geek stereotype has been around way too long. It sounds like you actually believe it. Clue: you may have frizzled hair, a face that looks like a pizza, and haven't showered in a week, but I'm just as big a geek as you and I don't fit that description, nor do any of my geek friends. So, like I said, grow up.

    1. Re:Grow up, loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget about it... look at the times on all of the posts in this thread. They were all posted around the same time. No doubt this was the work of some sad, horny, sex-starved little man who can't get laid no matter how hard he tries...

  137. gnuhairdo.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehe.. tux in centerfold reminds me of this site:
    gnuhairdo.com

  138. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can really easily pick out the dweebs on /. who can't get a date to spare their lives...

  139. Oh crap.... by AlienJ · · Score: 1

    if Playgirl comes out with a "men of Open Source" issue this summer, I am gonna run and hide....

  140. Repetitive work... by gavinhall · · Score: 1

    Posted by cookieman.k:

    I mostly agree with you, but for repetitive work there is allways the MACRO option (thing, whatever) that I once used to do some repetitive boring stuff. Thus a the macro isn't very easy to create if you want some special stuff done. You port to NT, I port to Linux from NT, isn't that cute? Greets:

  141. Linux.com == "the Linux website" ? by icqqm · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    "As befits the open source ideology, there are many Linux distributors, all with their own specialized versions. You can find a list of most of the versions on the Linux website."

    You can tell this is a newbie article when they refer to linux.com as "the Linux website".

  142. Tux with bunny ears. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it me, or would Tux look really cool with bunny ears?

  143. Down with the Collective! by Zaphod+B. · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft has been very much into making the user interface look good, but internally it's just a complete mess. And even people who program for Microsoft and who have had years of experience just don't know how it works internally. Worse, nobody dares change it. Nobody dares to fix bugs because it's such a mess that fixing one bug might just break a
    hundred programs that depend on that bug. And Microsoft isn't interested in anyone fixing bugs--they're interested in making money. They don't
    have anybody who takes pride in Windows 95 as an operating system."

    In the hood we call that a dis...

  144. nerd of porn by Corrinne+Yu · · Score: 1

    Nerd of porn

    http://www.asiacarrera.com



    Corrinne Yu
    3D Game Engine Programmer

  145. Ascii pr0n by ahaning · · Score: 1

    Well, try textfiles.com. They've got lots of nifty stuff (not just ascii porn). And since this is a story about Playboy, maybe this would be appropriate? (Nifty subliminal message). And does anyone know if someone has tried ascii porn movies? Some friends and I were joking about it at one time...but I wonder if it's ever been attempted.

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  146. thats not GUI... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's sticky!

  147. My recent "Lack of Software" story by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    (posting this about 5 hours to late to be seen but anyway) I'd recently downloaded an MP3 file (a 1944 new years "swing around the clock" - perfectly legal) and thought that it would be cool to put onto an audio CD for my dad - so how to convert MP3 to the proper wav format for the cd burner? Researching 'doze solutions turns up a $30 module for a popular 'doze program that requires the 'pro' version, which is $400. Yikes!!! So did a little google research on Linux solutions and found a neat simple script to pipe the output of mpg123 to sox and accomplish the job perfectly. Of course it doesn't proactively jump in your face with "What format would you like to convert to?" help wiz's, but the software was all there, mission accomplished. There's a LOT of hidden talent in most Linux distro's, more than most newbies & reviewers realize.

    Boojum

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  148. Filters at work? by network51.com · · Score: 1

    Where do you guys work?

    --


    A decent Network is finally here.
  149. Re:Playboy Programmers? by CentrX · · Score: 1

    What, did you think everyone who said "I read it for the articles" was lying?

    Chris Hagar

    --

    "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
  150. Reason to read Playboy by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    I only read Playboy for the source code listings.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  151. /. and porn by CentrX · · Score: 1
    The article's been up for only a little bit, but a huge number people have e-mailed that Playboy's Gillan has done a column on Linux

    Now what does this tell you about Slashdot readership if "a huge number of people" see this article after it has "been up for only a little bit?"

    Now for my second amazing conclusion: Porn and Linux are absolutely perfect together, Linux is open-source and porn is inherently open-source.

    Chris Hagar

    --

    "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
  152. Of course we know what it means! by supz · · Score: 1

    And I have, of course, no comment on what the sheer number of submissions must mean about our readers. *grin*

    It means that they read Playboy for the articles!

  153. Answers! by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

    Marvelous answers! When I stop dancing because someone said something helpful I will thank you again, sir. I just have to do an OpenBSD install now.

  154. let me know when... by tenuous · · Score: 1

    ...Linus poses for a centerfold.

  155. way cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Corinne:

    So you're working at 3d Realms as an Engine programmer, eh? That definitely qualifies as top geek in my book. lol. Amidst all this literary turbulence you walk in with class, grace, and insight, telling it exactly like it is. My hat is off to you. (End of groveling session)

    And I know about those guys who sit on the shoulders of giants and call themselves tall. A new year's wish to ya, Corinne - may you one day be able to post with the title of upper manager so you can hand these guys the pink slip. :)

    (Ok so I groveled a little more. Geek girls are at the top of the evolutionary ladder. All animals are supposed to bow down :)

  156. three cheers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I speak for everyone when I say Corrinne totaly gets the concept. She's 1000 times more qualified to talk shop than that Gillian chick, but you know what, I bet she's got no time to go around running computer articles in Playboy because she's out WORKING. That's right. Action talks and bullshit walks. That means Corrinne gets the megaphone and GILLIAN GETS THE REEBOKS! PS: What do you think of that blowhard John Dvorak? hehe. He's the original clueless glamorboy motormouth. IMHO of course :)

  157. Corrinne Yu vs Virtually Gillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It'll be a total bloodbath. I'd pay Corrinne to do the deed. A woman game engine programmer from 3d Realms would wipe the net with Gillian. She'd smack that bleached blonde so hard she'd turn brunette. A bona fide geek girl would knock the stupid right outta that playboy skank.

  158. Get Gillian Bonner on Geeks in Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Let her answer unscripted questions in real time from the slash cadets. Otherwise I'm not going to believe it's not just a sales gimmick using extended model (Miss April '96) photo rights to create a pretty illusion for repressed geeks.

    You believe that model bio stuff? Expect to read soon: "My boyfriend likes it when I put Tux under my * when we * ..."

  159. she's more 1337 than me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I sure as hell couldn't code a game engine. :) She's got a whole y2k emergency supply bunker full'a cans of whupass compared to the rest'a us loudmouthed AC's :-)

  160. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    and I think there is a eleet programmer gal around here somewhere who might be more than qualified to dish out the hard questions. :) hint hint

  161. gitaclue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    You guys sound like a rabid fan club being born. Corinne wouldn't go against her in a million years. She's got games to design, bud, she's out there doing real work, why would she waste time listening to gillian blow hot air? Lay off already.

  162. PHP by Corrinne+Yu · · Score: 1

    Apologies to OT.

    FYI, PHP is a HTML scripting language. Web administrators would be more familiar with it than coders of other specialties.

    Not knowing PHP just means web administration is not high on your job priority. (Apologies if I butchered PHP definition.)

    Ignorance is rarely fatal. Ability to learn and understand matters a lot more to being a good coder.

    The first step to being a good learner is to recognize and admit ignorance.


    Corrinne Yu
    3D Game Engine Programmer

  163. there is a point here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nOt knowing PHP is not a sign that you cannot run a column about compter tech issues, or Linux. But the overall point of the remark was - be it right or be it wrong - you could thrw any phrase at her that isn't a mainstream topic, and if she doesn't have her highly plagiarized geek info source to help her, she's going to made to look like a total idiot in public, and her columns will be about as respected as that dude over at ZDnet that everyone hates.

    except unlike her if he took off his clothes for a centerfold, he'd scare the civilians away :)