Slashdot Mirror


R.I.P. Iridium

Archeopteryx writes, "Motorola has posted a notice that they expect, barring a financial 'White Knight,' Iridium service to end at 11:59 p.m. EST on March 17. A few questions come to mind: 1) What becomes of the abandoned satellites? They are a real nuisance to astronomers due to the 'Iridium Flash' effect, and they complicate launch windows for satellites destined for any inclination. 2) Have these any Ham Radio use? 3) Assuming there is a use for them, who owns them after they are abandoned? Any Space Law experts out there? An abandoned ship is subject to salvage laws; how about an abandoned spacecraft?"

241 comments

  1. W'hey! by vkg · · Score: 1

    Firstly, first post? Secondly: two words "Iridium Modem". Screw voice. Think a device the size of a hardback book that will give you email access anywhere on the planet, from four AA cells.

    1. Re:W'hey! by TheSimon · · Score: 2

      Well it may just work, if email is worth 3,000$ to someone. That's the MSRP for the Iridium phone with a data rate of 2400 bps.
      Also, I just found this article on the amount of money Motorola recieves from Iridium to operate and maintain everything. Between 128 and 179 million per quarter!!

    2. Re:W'hey! by DazedAndAmused · · Score: 1

      I think the plan is to "deorbit" the satellites later this year (barring purchase by someone.) Gives a whole new meaning to "taking down the network."

  2. Iridium Flash effect? by ClayJar · · Score: 1

    Call me ignorant, but am I the only one who has never heard of the Iridium Flash effect? Does anyone have a link to follow? (It sounds intriguing.)

    1. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by g1t>>v · · Score: 3

      When the iridium satellite passes the field of view of the telescope, you see suddenly a very bright flash because the sattelite is rather reflective ... hence the name Iridium Flash :-)

    2. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Niko. · · Score: 1

      I would guess that as faces of the satellite's hull catch sunlight they reflect a flash into telescopes that is much brighter than the objects the scope is trying to see, thus interfering with research and maybe even damaging the instruments.

      Why doesn't the air force just use them to test anti-satellite weaponry?

    3. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by ceo · · Score: 1

      Ya know, there's this thing called a search engine... :-)

      http://www.satellite.eu.org/sat/vsohp/iridium.ht ml

    4. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Chops-Frozen-Water · · Score: 5

      A link from an old Slashdot story is a story in Wired. Basically, Iridium use(s|d) a frequency that "bled" into one frequently used by radio-astronomers to observe the cosmos.
      --

      --
      The Future: Some assembly required; batteries not included.
    5. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Bamfarooni · · Score: 2
      Lots of information here about flares and links to software to predict them, including a statement saying: a de-orbit plan will have to be submitted (by Motorola) to eliminate the satellite constellation.

      http://www.satellite.eu.org/sat/vs ohp/iridium.html

    6. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Audin · · Score: 5

      Iridium satellites have three large, flat, reflective antennas arrainged at an angle to the main spacecraft. These antennas, when at the right angle, can produce a very bright glint of reflected runlight. If you know where to look, the flares can be seen in broad daylight.

      Look here: http://www2.satellite.eu.org/sa t/vsohp/iridium.html

      They explain the effect, and even link to flare prediction software.

    7. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 5

      Specifically, the antennae on the Iridium are flat and highly polished surfaces. The flashes can get as bright as -8 magnitude for a few seconds.

      The web page to check out is www.heavens-above.com. Give them your latitude and longitude, and they can provide you with predictions of where to look and when.

    8. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you are kidding about the anti-satellite tests. Space junk is already a really serious problem, and the idea of blowing up a bunch of satellites for test or fun makes the serious problem of tracking and avoiding space junk so much worse.

    9. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by dead_penguin · · Score: 1

      See also:
      http://www.heavens-above.com/. They have web-based software for predicting these, and other satellite events. A cool site all around.

      ...not affiliated etc.

      --

      It's only software!
    10. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      The Iridium satellites have 3 highly reflective flat panels that directly reflect the sun's disk to a spot a few tens of kms wide at the earth's surface. The flashes or flares as they are sometimes called are very bright, easily seen with the naked eye sometimes even during the day. There are a number of programs or web sites that predict when a flare will be visible in your area. See http://www.satellite.eu.org/sat/ vsohp/iridium.html for more info.

      Note this web site says "In addition, a de-orbit plan will have to be submitted to eliminate the satellite constellation."

    11. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by TaxSlave · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't the air force just use them to test anti-satellite weaponry?

      Easy answer:

      If you take out a sattelite, you run a decent chance of leaving MORE debris in space than you start with.

      If any of that debris took out a useful sattelite, there'd be H to pay.

      paperbacks.homepage.com

    12. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2

      It's like slashdotting a telescope. Iridium satellites are so reflective that they cause numerous false hits, flooding a telescope with light and making genuine observation impossible.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    13. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Geez, didn't you ever play Asteroids?

    14. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Yardley · · Score: 3

      The Iridium Flash effect occurs when a great idea for a worldwide product flashes onto the scene, allowing people who want to have the best of everything spend more money. In a flash of bright light, the idea burns out leaving behind an armada of outrageously expensive technology orbiting the earth.

      Seriously, though, check out Observing Iridium Flashes and Heavens Above (as someone already mentioned).

      According to this article in Sailing Source, the last link: tells you where and when to look for IRIDIUM satellite "flashes" as the sun reflects light off the satellites passing overhead. You plug in your lat/long position and it will tell you where and when in the night or predawn sky to look to see an Iridium "flash."

      Some people call them flares apparently to differentiate from meteor flashes.

      The reason satellites are made of highly reflective materials is so they reflect the sunlight and not gather heat, sort of like a car baking in the hot sun. I imagine there *are* some coating materials which would reduce the glare and imagine that so far, there has been little reason to use them.

      But remember that the Iridium "flare" is the reflection from the solar panels, which cannot be covered so easily as with some kind of paint.

      ... [read page to get context] ...

      That's an attractive but malicious thought, Lew! While we can think and talk of that amongst ourselves, I shudder to think of the child wanting to take his telescope into the back yard some night and Mom objects, saying that watching the sky is "evil" because she has no idea of the difference between a meteor flash and an Iridium flare!

      --

      --
      He lives in a world where those who do not run the client software of the omnipresent meme are unacceptable.
    15. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'H to pay'?

      Erm, do you mean 'Hell'?

      We're not 5 year olds, y'know (despite what some of the trolls would indicate).

    16. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Score+Whore · · Score: 2

      Actually I think Hemos get's a check everytime a piece of space junk wipes out a useful piece of space junk.

    17. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why doesn't the air force just use them to test anti-satellite weaponry?

      Rumours are they did but gave up after discovering those bloody things are actually moving.

      Top Gun II - Still staring Teddy B.

    18. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Iridium satellites use microwave antennas that look like the ones you see on the microwave towers down here on terra firma. What is different about these is they have a reflective film (sort of like mylar) covering them to protect them from the solar radiation. And, since the antennas are flat, they make very good mirrors. The sun reflects off of the antenna and down to Earth. Btw, they are actually called "Iridium Flares". Here's a good site to check out when there will be an Iridium flare in your area: http://www.heavens-above.com

    19. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Yardley · · Score: 1

      For those wanting instant gratification, here's a bunch of pictures of Iridium flares:

      Iridium Flare Photos - Part 1
      Iridium Flare Photos - Part 2

      I wouldn't be surprised to start hearing UFO sitings based on the number of pictures which occur during partial daylight and the orb (flattened-circle) shape of the flares. Of course, such cover could give good camouflage for real UFOs.

      --

      --
      He lives in a world where those who do not run the client software of the omnipresent meme are unacceptable.
    20. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It actually is slightly more complicated. The flash (AKA iridium flare) comes from the solar panels, which are large and reflective. The bird rotates at a certain rate, and for a given bird you can calculate a time & place where the solar array will reflect sunlight to a given point on the ground. There are web sites that do this calculation, so you can look up the next flare visible from your area.

    21. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meant to say saucer at an oblique angle.

    22. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Binkly · · Score: 1

      The second most spectacular thing I've seen in the sky was a double Iridium flare. At first, it just looked like any other visible satellite. Slowly, the brightness grew, until it was about as bright as Venus. Just as it was fading, the second one followed. If you're interested in seeing one in your neighborhood, "iridflar" is one package for calculating passes. (The most spectacular thing I've seen in the sky was a shuttle re-entry; the Iridium flares are a pretty distant second.)

    23. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by TaxSlave · · Score: 1

      'H to pay'?

      Erm, do you mean 'Hell'?

      We're not 5 year olds, y'know (despite what some of the trolls would indicate).

      You may not be 5 year olds, but my son is. If parenthood has taught me one thing, it is that I have a responsibility to be a good example to him and others.

      Plus, in the age of unquestionable filtering software, you never know what might cause a site to be blocked completely to younger geeks, needful of guidance. I'd hate for a public library to disallow /. to some youngster because I couldn't control myself just a little.

      Anyway, the habit of saying 'H' comes from having insane roommates, and taking part in a language I can only describe as "stupid shit."

      At the heart of the language is the pronouncable acronymn. One particular exclamation gave a name to a BBS network two of us ran for some time. We called it FIITAnet.

      paperbacks.homepage.com

    24. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't the air force just use them to test anti-satellite weaponry? Attack sat's are illegal and are grounds for war.

    25. Re:Iridium Flash effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Iridium flashes are almost never a problem in optical astronomy. My suspicion is that most of the articles about how Iridium is bad for astronomers comes from general confusion about how modern astronomy works. The fact is that pretty much all of the EM spectrum is interesting to someone these days, and there's instruments to work in the entire thing from radio to gamma rays. Unfortunately, when people say 'astronomer' the image is a big optical telescope, so that's what is reported. Iridium is a real pain for radio astronomers, but not for optical people.

      I'll try to explain why Iridium, like most other satellites, isn't a problem optically. First, Iridium flares, bright as they are, don't sit at -6 or -8 magnitude forever. This only happens for a short time as the satellite moves across the sky. Most of the time Iridium satellites look just like any other satellite through a large telescope. Second, modern telescopes are large in size because they need to gather a lot of light, not because they see a lot of the sky at a time. The field of view for most telescopes is rather small, so the chances of a bright satellite passing through your field of view is also small to begin with. Combine this with the tiny effective area covered by a satellite as it moves across the sky and your chances of having one in your field of view are slim.

      Now, that being said the fact is that with some exceptions, if a satellite passes through your field of view when you're taking an exposure the object you are interested in is rarely affected. The exception to this would be large extended objects like galaxies or faint nebulae. In those cases, if you can, your best bet is to take many shorter exposures and add them together, reducing the chance that your final image product will have a trail somewhere in it. You can pick and choose from a bunch of exposures to avoid one that might have a trail in your target of interest.

      The fact is that the real damage is being done on the other end of the spectrum. My understanding is that Iridium drives the molecular cloud guys positively crazy.The optical component of Iridium can be forecast and easily avoided; blasting potentially interesting parts of the radio spectrum with orders of magnitude more energy than astronomers are trying to see is not easily avoided.

      I am still curious why the satellites aren't considered an asset in bankruptcy proceedings. Regardless of what it's designed to do, I can't believe there is no other use for the satellites at all.

  3. Sell the sattelites by ca1v1n · · Score: 2

    Last time I heard anything about this, they were considering selling the sattelite network to NATO or the U.S. military. I don't know too much about the Iridium network, and I know it's probably not quite up to military specifications, but with a little creative engineering, they could have a nice sattelite network dirt cheap.

    1. Re:Sell the sattelites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those satellites were abandoned, remember? I already claimed them, they are mine. Please quit trying to think of ways to blow them up, I won't be able to use them anymore if you did.

  4. Makes me wonder.... by Phyxis · · Score: 3

    I have to wonder whether Iridium would have sold better if the US Gov't wasn't so antsy about being able to wiretap it.

    How did Qualcomm get around this for their tri-band GlobalStar phones?

    -P

    1. Re:Makes me wonder.... by copito · · Score: 2

      All GlobalStar calls are routed through the public telephone network until it gets to a ground station in the same region (political and
      geographical) as the phone. This makes regulators happier since they can tax and tap as they always have.
      --

      --
      "L'IT c'est moi!"
  5. To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by griffjon · · Score: 4

    Rogue communication satellites abandoned by their creators and no longer supported by their users? Satellites /designed/ for cellphone-like communication?

    Hmmmmm... hack targets. *drool* Think of the freenet-style net we could bring on if someone hacked these babies and set up satelite networking. Do they have inband commands?

    My bets are on the Cult of the Dead Cow to be the first to OwN these guys. Heh. I predict a satellite-hack version of king of the hill coming up.

    --
    Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    1. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by costas · · Score: 2

      AFAIK, Iridium cannot support data transmission --which is the primary reason McCaw opted not to bail them out, since he can't use their birds for Teledesic.

      Iridium sounds like an idea that was planned by a bureacracy when cell phones weren't that widespread and by the time they got around to implement it, it was already obsolete...

      I think there are 7yrs left to the useful life of their constellation --another company can't use them because they're proprietary, and they'd cost too much to take care of. My guess: USAF buys them at liquidation prices and tests their sat killers ;-)...



      engineers never lie; we just approximate the truth.

    2. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by kill_9_1 · · Score: 1

      I expect the next 2600 quarterly to have a writeup along these lines...

      --
      kill_9_1
    3. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      I'll take that bet for $100. Just send a money order.

    4. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the l0pht say something about "aquiring" a satellite for their Gnet project. Well here's their chance.

    5. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by BLiP2 · · Score: 1

      Just a long as the satalites don't grow sentient and try to destroy Earth several hundred years in the future, a la v'ger.

      --
      Vote Technocratic! Government by killer robots!
    6. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by Karpe · · Score: 1
      If you take a look at http://www.wired.com/wired/arc hive/6.10/iridium.html you will see that Iridium was not designed by bureaucrats, but by hackers. Too bad it was a hack with no commercial success. It's easy to talk how bad the system is, but please consider that 1. the idea of global communications was not so common in the design days as they are today, and 2. these are the guys to first suggest, and more important, build a system like that. They had the dream, they got the money, they built it. That's why I'm sad to hear of the failure of Iridium. Great hack value.

      I heard Bob Cringely suggesting that Iridium would be a great buy, because the big bucks, those necessary to put the sattelites in orbit, were already spent, and that the money that you could get from the service would be interesting :)

      But sometimes he misses, so, who knows?

    7. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To quote Not the Rensselaer Handbook (extra points for anyone who can correctly identify the purpose of the annoying characters in the first column):

      What does a Yerazunis use for a personal radio intercom?

      Westar VI. (Nobody else knows where it went.


      Anyone else here who attended an overly nerdy engineering school will recognize classmates in NtRH.
    8. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of you who would prefer a readable copy of Not the Rensselaer Handbook, one of the authors has actually converted it to HTML here.

    9. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by BattyMan · · Score: 1

      The characters in the first column were to provide "carriage control" information to early printers. FORTRAN was real big on these. I always thought this was amusing, as these machines had no actual carriage. Paper feed control would have been more precise, as they controlled things like double spacing lines of output, and overstriking.

      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    10. Re:To the 0wn3rz go the ComSats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHA! Your belief that CdC could "OwN" these satellites themselves is a testament to their media manipulation skills. Back orifice is something any first year CS student at a community college could write.

      The truly skilled don't feel any need to band together into silly gangs. These are the people who have the skills and motivation to play with Mot's sat network.

  6. Call me extra ignorant... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 0

    ...but what are the Iridium satelites used for exactly?

    1. Re:Call me extra ignorant... by Mister+Attack · · Score: 2

      Iridium is a satellite telephone network. Worldwide service, very expensive.
      --

    2. Re:Call me extra ignorant... by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2

      They're a network of communications satellites in very low orbits. Users have handsets that contact the satellites directly. You can travel anywhere in the world with an Iridium telephone and are able to call anywhere else in the world, on or off the Iridium net, without depending on the local infrastructure. Theoretically a good idea, but it was badly executed.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    3. Re:Call me extra ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why am I the last to know about these things??

    4. Re:Call me extra ignorant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are extra ignorant.

  7. Iridium flashes while meteor observing by waldeaux · · Score: 2
    The first time I saw an Iridium flash was while I was observing the Perseid meteor shower...

    It took me a moment to realize what it was that I was seeing, but for a few tense seconds.... :-)

  8. I Claim The Satellites by quakeaddict · · Score: 2

    Let it be forever known that on this day, March 10, 2000, I lay claim to the staellites. They are mine, now and forever.

    If anyone wishes to purchase one, the bidding starts at a mere $250.

    Any takers?

    --
    I'm still working on a clever footer.
    1. Re:I Claim The Satellites by Bad+Mojo · · Score: 2

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless you get on a shuttle and beat me to orbit, them there satellites is MINE.

      Posession is 10/10ths of the law in space. Muhahaha!


      Bad Mojo

      --
      Bad Mojo
      "If you can't win by reason, go for volume." -- Calvin
    2. Re:I Claim The Satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let it be forever known that on this day, March 10, 2000, I lay claim to the staellites. They are mine, now and forever.

      You can have all the staellites. I lay claim to the satellites at this moment - 5:56pm EST on March 10, 2000.

      I have decided at this point not to sell. I have yet to implement my evil^H^H^H^H master plan.

    3. Re:I Claim The Satellites by anotherone · · Score: 1

      You should auction them off on Geekswap.com.

      Make Seven

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    4. Re:I Claim The Satellites by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      I'm going to hit my favourite mobile store in the city and see if I can lay claim to the prop phones, just for fun...

    5. Re:I Claim The Satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late! I have already patented the idea of using these satellites for any other purpose. If any of you sonsabitches want to use them, you have to PAY ME FIRST.

    6. Re:I Claim The Satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I wonder how soon before someone puts them up for auction on eBay?

    7. Re:I Claim The Satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I already called "Dibs!"

    8. Re:I Claim The Satellites by wolf- · · Score: 1

      mmm....single click affiliate satellite based deorbiting patent....

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  9. No ham use (as is) by kenh · · Score: 2
    These satilites are not "tasked" for any ham bands, and it is not likely that their operating freq. can be updated without hopping on a shuttle (at a minimum).

    The Iridium satellites will be bought for pennies on the dollar, and the service will resurface at much lower cost (IMHO). Will it be competitive with cell phones across town, no - but for ships at sea, scientists in the brush, etc. it will be useful.

    Now, what kind of deal will there be on these phones on eBay in a few months? ;^)

    --
    Ken
  10. Solutions for Last Century's Technology by WillAffleck · · Score: 3

    1. What becomes of the satellites?

    Well, my bet is the NSA will "borrow" them. Or else the military wing will use them as "hot rocks" for space defense. Sadly, due to Bill G's and Paul A's holdings, they won't be used to bombard Redmond ...

    2. Ham Radio use.

    Nah

    3. Who owns them?

    The country that the company resides in. AKA The United States of America. But if truly abandoned and noted as such, you could get salvage rights. My bet is the govt agency that takes them will file under the Black Budget restrictions, so you won't know they own them.

    4. Can we pirate them? (bonus question)

    Yes. Satellites keep working even after the ground crews stop them. Just give them the power up signal and reprogram them. This will show up in the next Bond movie "The Spy Who Spied On Me", when the evil Bill Sateg tries to rule the world, forgetting that he already owns it.

    --
    Will in Seattle
  11. lovely help by CommanderTaco · · Score: 2

    gotta love those faq's at the bottom of the page...

    q: can motorola help me out at all in finding an alternative satellite service provider?

    a: motorola cares deeply about its customers. However, motorola feels it cannot provide you any more help than listing a couple of phone numbers at this time.

    1. Re:lovely help by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > q: can motorola help me out at all in finding an alternative satellite service provider?
      >
      > a: motorola cares deeply about its customers. However, motorola feels it cannot provide you any more help than listing a couple of phone numbers at this time.

      And if you're in a remote area like the Antarctic, and your only voice line out is an Iridium phone, Motorola recommends that you make that phone call quickly :-)

    2. Re:lovely help by displaytest · · Score: 1

      I don't have moderator privileges now, so I've just got to respond and say that that was one of the few times that I've laughed out loud while reading Slashdot.

  12. AVAST YE LUBBERS by turb · · Score: 2

    While I'm not a lawyer and I don't play one on TV, if I remember rightly (My minor was Space Studies from UND) spacecraft are under the same salvage rules as abandoned ships at sea.

    Now just cause Iridium is out of business doesn't classify these as abandoned craft. However if Iridium's offices etc is entirely shutting down and no more signals are sent to these craft then indeed it would seem that someone with "broadcast" capabilities could take over themselves a satellite provided they have the knowledge, software to do so.

    I'm sure no matter what this will be a first in the realms of space law. If I were Iridium I'm most certainly want to give these satellites over to someone, otherwise it could be bumper cars in outspace. Certainly don't want somebody unqualified hacking on a spacecraft's navigations. (Scenes from MST 3K the Movie start rolling through my head)

    Regards,

  13. Iridium RIP by gmkeegan · · Score: 4

    One of Iridium's press releases stated that if a "White Knight" was found that they had drawn up a plan for restructuring in the coming year. They also stated that the same plan had steps for de-orbiting the satellites, a process that they expect to take 6 or 7 months. http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20000306/tc/teleco ms_iridium_4.html

  14. Iridium Satellites of Love by cprincipe · · Score: 4
    Actually, these satellites were created with just this contingency in mind. Upon the failure of the company, these satellites are programmed to RAIN FIREY DEATH down upon the peoples of the Earth, resulting in THE END OF LIFE as we know it. BWA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!

    Either that, or they will become the new Skynet.

    --

    bun-fhuinneog agam!

    1. Re:Iridium Satellites of Love by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More details here.

  15. Ham Radio Uses by BoyPlankton · · Score: 1
    I don't know what frequencies the satellites were designed to relay, but I don't think they could be used for any amateur purposes.

    Boy Plankton
    Still waiting to see if JAWSAT or ASUSAT are going to be turned on.

    1. Re:Ham Radio Uses by volsung · · Score: 2
      I'm going to guess neither. (I was the Software Team leader for ASUSat through launch. Now I'm doing other things). Both JAWSAT and ASUSat were practically shaken to pieces on launch. As far as we could tell, the solar cell array was not feeding current to the batteries, so we running totally on our initial charge. ASUSat had 15 hours of operating time before we predict the batteries died (telemetry suggests that the battery volage was dropping according to standard Ni-Cad discharge curves). We last heard from the satellite 14 hours after launch and have officially declared it dead: Press Release

      At last check, JAWSAT wasn't working too well or at all. It's a shame because JAWSAT had a camera that was taking pictures of the deployment of the other nanosatellites. That would have let us see what we looked like after launch so we could check for external damage. Not likely, I know, but it would be one less question.

      Hope that clears things up.

  16. Some are going to be pissed... by maan · · Score: 1

    I don't myself own an Iridium phone or pager (i haven't exactly found the need for one, yet), but I'm guessing that the people that bought an Iridium phone or pager are going to be pissed (they're pretty expensive...). Unless of course it's all big companies that bought them!

    Maan

    1. Re:Some are going to be pissed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course it's all big companies...your average welfare mother will make do with a simple cellular phone, I don't think anyone that got stung with an Iridium purchase is going to really hurt from having to find another satellite phone provider. These people:
      a) had enough money to buy one in the first place
      b) had the need to be able to make a phone call from anywhere in the world, at any time.
      c) frequently traveled around the world.

      --
      no pity for the majority

    2. Re:Some are going to be pissed... by dwchapin · · Score: 2

      At least one of the Globalstar retailers is offering a $495 trade-in on a Globalstar phone. This is a pretty good deal, since the G* phones are much cheaper anyway, and by all accounts work much better. Plus, they're the only game in town at the moment, unless you enjoy GEO-style voice latency (eg:Inmarsat)

      The link is worth it just for the animated GIF of the Iridium logo (the constellation Ursa Major) falling out of the sky.

    3. Re:Some are going to be pissed... by leperjuice · · Score: 1

      There's one really big "company" that has already bought a bunch of Iridium phones:
      The US State Department

      They have issued something like 2-3 phones per ambassadorial mission (I'm guessing there may be more for heavy-duty missions like Germany and the UK). The Ambassador gets one, the DCM (Deputy Chief of Mission) gets one I believe, and there may be others.

      Your tax dollars at work (for all us American citizens).

      --

      -- "I am disrespectful to dirt. Can you not see that I am serious!"

  17. Beowulf 'em! by mholve · · Score: 0

    Naw, seriously. Perhaps they can be re-utilized to provide connectivity, or if worse comes to worse, the shuttle can scoop 'em up and melt 'em down to fund the ISS. :)

  18. All the sats will be de-orbited (and burned up) by jjo · · Score: 3

    In addition to desperately looking for new financing, the Iridium folks will be preparing a "de-orbiting" plan for safe destruction of the Iridium constellation. (If they were just left derelict, they might cause significant problems down the road.)

    If there is no last-minute financial rescue by the deadline, the de-orbiting plan will start, although it may take up to six months to complete.

  19. Bad news for G�ran Kropp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And a pity for the readers of Aftonbladet. Now they will not be able to chat with him on his way to the North Pole.

  20. I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    March 15th is my birthday, so how about giving me one hell of a birthday present. Then I will decide what to do (and will accept any of your suggestions) with the satellites..

    1. Re:I have an idea by Belltower · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but today is *my* birthday, so I give them to me. I have equipped them so they can rain flaming death across the entire world's surface. This will happen at just after the Farscape Season 2 premiere next friday unless you pay me [dramatic pause] ONE ... MILLION ... DOLLARS!

    2. Re:I have an idea by unitron · · Score: 1

      Raining flaming death across the entire world's surface would be kinder than any more of Farscape unless the first episode was some sort of isolated abomination, following which they replaced the cast, the writers, the premise, the sets, the producer and director, and basically everything except the title.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  21. What to do with old sats. by Brooks+Davis · · Score: 2

    Some of the work I do is in the space debris area, specificaly in collision avoidance. I'm not an expert, but I believe that all recent satelites are supposed to file a plan for what to do at their end of life. For LEOs (Low Earth Orbit satelites) that usually involves deorbiting them so they either burn up entierly or what doesn't burn up lands in the ocean where it isn't likely to hit something. The Iridium birds will only last a few more years before they fall out of the sky on their own. Since nobody seems to want them, I suspect they will get dumped in the Pacific.

    --
    -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
    1. Re:What to do with old sats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are EXACTLY correct. In fact you have the only informed opinion Ive seen on the entire page... I work daily with orbital debris issues. Projects do in fact have to have a disposal plan for thier spacecraft. There are many other guidelines they also much follow.

      The guidelines can be found (they are publically available) in the NSS 1740.14 document if anyone is interested. If you search for NSS 1740.14, orbital debris and JSC on the web you will be brought to the official center of orbital debris, Code Q of NASA at JSC.

      Thank you Brook Davis for being the only one with a clue.

      Kevin Kamel

  22. Copy of note to Motorala by Hesperus · · Score: 4

    To Whome it may concern:

    It has my come to your attention that failing to find a buyer you will soon abandon your network of communications satellites, known as Iridium.

    I am prepared to offer $100.00 US for your satellite network.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter. I'm sure you will agree that such a remarkable sum underscores the seriousness of my offer.

    Regards,

    ........

    --
    ____________________________________

    -- I beleve you'll like this -->
    1. Re:Copy of note to Motorala by jeeves · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should just put the whole thing up for sale on eBay?

    2. Re:Copy of note to Motorala by Domino · · Score: 1

      You miss one very important point. The reason Iridium is going out of business is that they
      cost more to operate than $100.
      If you plan to just look at them and wait until they fall down, and that spectacle would be worth $100 to you, then go ahead with your offer.
      I can assure you, if there is a real use for these sattelites that will drive in more revenue than the costs for keeping them running, someone will come up with a substantial sum and get them.

    3. Re:Copy of note to Motorala by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this $3M financing only buys them 11 days of operation, thats more than a quarter million $ per day. $100 will buy you about 31 seconds of operating time.

    4. Re:Copy of note to Motorala by boneshintai · · Score: 1
      And what, exactly, would Jeff K. do with 66 Iridium sats?

    5. Re:Copy of note to Motorala by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      I am prepared to offer $100.00 US for your satellite network.

      I'm sure that the organization would be happy to sell you the hardware for that price. They would probably include for free in the offer the responsibility for whatever ridiculous debt they've accumulated.

  23. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Echelon. How convenient. Abandoned communications satellites from an NSA-friendly company!

    1. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, the great idiocy and assumption that is Slashdot.

      they will deorbit the satellite, moron.

  24. Abandoned? by zaius · · Score: 1
    By cancelling services is Motorlla really renouncing its ownership of the sattelites? I would imagine they would keep track of them and look for their own uses for them, or perhaps sell them to cell phone companies?

    I fail to see the logic behind abandoning billions of dollars worth of sattelites.

  25. Did anyone read the FAQ? by IshamaelNT · · Score: 0

    When you post an FAQ, don't you usually only post questions that have answers, not "We cannot compare other sattellite phone providers." It looks kinda silly...
    ---------------------------------------- --------------

    1. Re:Did anyone read the FAQ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't know the answer, but the Question gets Asked Frequently, it makes perfect sense to add the question to the FAQ and say that they don't know the answer.

  26. Iridium Flash - lots of questions by DeepDarkSky · · Score: 2
    I've never heard about the Iridium Flash thing either. But if Iridium's satellites are a nuisance to astronomers, is it merely because of the way they were made?

    What if, instead, they were not made of reflective material?

    The handful of iridium satellites is nothing compared to all the other debris and satellites that we have put in orbit - if iridium satellites are such nuisances to astronomers, then what about all the other ones?

    Is there a set of rules for satellite construction? I'm sure there some rules that everyone follows loosely.

    Is there an international organization that regulates satellite launch schedules? I'm sure there is, it's too important for there not to be any.

    If satellites were problems to astronomers, should we be concerned about all the satellite launches that seem to happen all the time?

    Certainly, the iridium satellites can be put to use doing something, otherwise we'd just billions of dollars of floating space junk?

    1. Re:Iridium Flash - lots of questions by astrophysics · · Score: 2

      >Is there an international organization that regulates satellite launch schedules? I'm sure there is, it's too important for there not to be any.

      Yes

      >If satellites were problems to astronomers, should we be concerned about all the satellite launches that seem to happen all the time?

      Well, most satelites are a problem, but Iridium satelites are especially annoying. Something about their design must make them give very strong specular reflections. Sure, we'd like it if satelites were reduced in number, but we'd also like it if the ones that are up weren't as rude as Iridium satelites are.

      While many satelites leave a streak across an image, Iridium Flashes can saturate several pixel and ruin an entire exposure, which might have taken hours to take. Astronomers have wised up, and try to schedule around Iridium Flashes and take shorter exposures and add them when possible. However, this means we waste our time that we should be doing scientific research correction for the obnoxousness of Iridium. Also, many observations have had to be retaken, while astronomers were still trying to figure out what was causing the problems.

    2. Re:Iridium Flash - lots of questions by Tackhead · · Score: 3
      > Iridium Flashes can saturate several pixel and ruin an entire exposure, which might have taken hours to take.
      > Astronomers have wised up, and try to schedule around Iridium Flashes and take shorter exposures and add them when possible. However, this means we waste our time
      > that we should be doing scientific research correction for the obnoxousness of Iridium.

      The alternative - deorbiting them by shooting them down en masse - is just as bad; space debris all over the place.

      Which reminds me - it's been said that the dinosaurs died because they didn't have a space program. Truth is, they did have access to space, but the dinosaurs were damned if they did, damned if they didn't. Y'see, if it weren't for spending so much time avoiding iridium flashes, the dino-astronomers would have seen the damn asteroid coming with plenty of time to spare.

      But by the time the dino-astronomers wised up to why their near-earth asteroid observations were so screwed up and shot down the iridium satellites in a fit of rage (when the Dean of Astronomy's a T. Rex, these things happen), incidentally creating the big layer of iridium-enriched dirt we observe at the 65-million-year mark in the fossil record, it was far too late to prevent the asteroid collision.

      What's more, the rest of the dino-citizenry was so annoyed at them ("First they send tons of iridium into our backyard swimming pools, then they try to tell us there's gonna be a big hunk of rock falling down next year, but that that mess won't be their fault! Stupid astronomers! How dumb do they think we are?") that nobody heeded their warnings.

      So the rock came, and the only survivors were the dino-astronomers themselves and a few mammals. After the catastrophe, the dino-astronomers gave up on astronomy and settled for evolving wings instead. It had started as an effort to lower the liftoff weight of their planned escape vehicles, but it turned out that flying was so much fun that they just gave up on the whole getting-to-orbit thing and settled into their new ecological niche, leaving dominion of the earth to the mammals.

      I s'pose it worked out for the best, at least for us primates... but I can't help but wonder if the cockroaches are behind this whole iridium thing, just waiting for their turn to evolve...

    3. Re:Iridium Flash - lots of questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment about only a handful of iridium satellites is incorrect. There are 66 satellites and are now scheduled to be crashed into the Indian Ocean.

  27. Bankruptcy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iridium will go into bankruptcy, and the bankruptcy trustee will sell the satellite network for whatever it will bring. The proceeds, likely to be pennies on the dollar, will go to creditors. There will be no abandoned satellites.

  28. Harm for Radio Astronomy Even Worse than Flash by astrophysics · · Score: 5
    An even bigger problem than the flash is Iridium's invasion on radio astronomy. In particular it interferes with on emission line (CO I beleive), which is important for determing metal abundances and temperatures in gas clouds.


    The frequencies were protected by international treaty. Additionally, MOT agreed to respect the critical frequencies when they received nearby frequencies. Later, they went back on their word and ignored the international treaty.


    In fairnes to MOT, they have worked with the major radio astronomy facilities to avoid making the frequency completely useless by scheduling windows when they would significanly limit their interference in certain locations. However, they still interfere and it makes scheduling time an even for obnoxious task for astronomers who try to maximize the utility of their observatories.


    Even worse, it sets a very bad precedent for a big company to threaten to ruin an important scientific resource, and then "be nice" by being better than originally planned. What if every big company decides to put up a big network of satelites interfering with one frequency range, but agrees to be nice in certain locations at certain times? Not good for science!

    1. Re:Harm for Radio Astronomy Even Worse than Flash by astrophysics · · Score: 3

      Sorry, it's HO, not CO. The HO line is a good probe of molecular clouds. Also HO masers provide some of the best observational evidence for a black hole at the center of some galaxy (NGC 4???).

    2. Re:Harm for Radio Astronomy Even Worse than Flash by quux26 · · Score: 1
      What if every big company decides to put up a big network of satelites interfering with one frequency range, but agrees to be nice in certain locations at certain times? Not good for science!

      Call me an optimist, but incentive for an observatory on the moon? Don't get me wrong, you're not incorrect.

      My .02
      Quux26

      --

      My .02
      Quux26
      www.crashspace.net
    3. Re:Harm for Radio Astronomy Even Worse than Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      It's NGC4258 and the maser is plain old water (H20).

      I don't know about Iridium's bandpass but I would think that the sattelites will be sold off as part of the discorporation of Iridium.

      So I'd expect the interference to continue.

    4. Re:Harm for Radio Astronomy Even Worse than Flash by Steeldrivin · · Score: 1

      They only harm radio astronomy while they're broadcasting. Why would they be broadcasting when the company is gone?

      --

      The ambitions are: wake up, breathe, keep breathing.
  29. Iridium Not Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not folding the company yet ... just discontinuing service. If and when they fold the enterprise, the satellites will be sold to pay of creditors.

  30. ...and if all else fails... by Quintus · · Score: 1
    They would always make nice target practice for the new SDI-whatsits ;-)

    (Link is to the American (only one?) projext).

    ___________________

    --
    He who fights and runs away,

  31. BIBLICAL IMPLICATIONS?!?!?! by CiXeL · · Score: 1

    Isnt iridium also swahili for wormwood?????

    1. Re:BIBLICAL IMPLICATIONS?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FACT!

    2. Re:BIBLICAL IMPLICATIONS?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gotta love the orb

    3. Re:BIBLICAL IMPLICATIONS?!?!?! by TangoChaz · · Score: 1

      Actually it's Chernobyl...

      Chernobyl is Russian for Wormwood.


      TangoChaz

      "It's not enough to be on the right track -- you have to be moving faster than the train." -- Rod Davis, Editor of Seahorse Mag.

      --

      TangoChaz

      --------------------
      Wise men talk because they have something to say, fools because the
  32. Maybe they will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    open source it now. I refuse to use a cell phone that I don't have the source code to.

    1. Re:Maybe they will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is funny? You must have loved Jar Jar Binks...

  33. Jurisdiction by Esperandi · · Score: 2

    IANAL of course, but I know that anything over 200 miles off the coast in the ocean is complete legal limbo, I would imagine the same thing applies in space, although there may very well be UN agreements of something because we couldn't have people making attack satellites to kill ours and getting away with it just because its in space (like you can go 200 miles out from the coast into the ocean, slay a bunch of people, then come back with no repercussions (at least from what I've read about hospice cruises where they euthenize dozens of elderly sick people once they get 200 miles out))

    Esperandi

    1. Re:Jurisdiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wrong.

      You are always under the jurisdiction of the flag your ship sails under. The US Coast Guard, for instance, can legally board a US-flagged ship 800 miles offshore.

      Then again, maritime trivia is one thing, reality is another. Do the deed at sea, dump the evidence in a neutral country, and return home, and yeah, you'll probably walk. -cwk.

  34. Iridium Flash? by ledward · · Score: 1

    What exactly is an Iridium Flash? i know that iridium is a communications satellite but what makes it so flashable. Is it the sun refelcting off it or its it something thats special for iridium. And if it is the sun why doesnt every other satellite do the same thing? Lets just take 'em all down!!!

  35. As far as I know... by Pufferfish · · Score: 1

    Iridium (or rather, Motorola) is planning on deorbiting the satellites, rather then just leaving millions of dollars worth of stuff up there. I read it on Ars, but they didn't seem to site a source (besides the guy who sent in the story) so it might not be true. But they're obviously not gonna to play finders-keepers with the things. If they don't find a buyer (I don't know what they would be good for, maybe some sort of wireless internet or something, or just use them to tie into another network), then they'll certainly take them down and sell them for something else (i bet a lot of the equipment in them is useful in and of itself).

    Sorry guys, no free satellites...

    --
    Then again, I could be wrong.
    1. Re:As far as I know... by gaudior · · Score: 1

      De-orbit is just a euphemism for 'crash and burn, Baby!'
      They send the command to belly-flop, and that's what they do.

  36. Internet 3! Spacenet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, how else are you going to be able to check your email and read Slashdot while trekking across the Antarctic?

    1. Re:Internet 3! Spacenet! by Ventilator · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't go to the antarctic. I'd miss the daily news.

      Anyway, GSM doesn't work there and Iridium is (was) much too expensive.

      --
      --- If OS were buildings, then the first woodpecker to come around would erase 95 % of civilization.
  37. I think they will just burn up. by Mr+T · · Score: 4
    I'm not a legal expert but... At my new job I have a TV on my desk and I generally keep it on CNBC all day to track the market and my stocks and it's the most exceptable channel to keep it on while coding (a few guys can do cartoons but it's suspect because the boss knows you want to watch them, nobody wants to admit the love CNBC) They've been talking about irridium lately too.

    As it goes, last Tuesday they talked about Irridium because some guy was bailing on them, it's the guy who owns vodafon. Anyhow, if nobody buys irridium then they will stop driving the satallites and after a while they will all enter the Earth's atmosphere and burn up. A few of them might make it a while but they will all suffer the same fate eventually. CNBC made it sound like on March 17 they will turn the satallites off and just let them drift.

    It's really kind of a bummer, I love the idea of a universal mobile phone. There are tons of applications for it. Irridium has been mismanaged since the get-go though. Nobody is going to be a $3000 portable phone and pay $8 a minute for service except for in the most extreme circumstances or they are the most reckless rich guys around. From what I've heard the line quality wasn't so hot either. My PCS phone works just about everywhere I've been in this country and I could easily buy a few more and use call forwarding in other jurisdictions if I needed it for much less than Irridium. There are also alternative satallite world phone ventures that are going on. I also think there are some laws in the US about satallite communication. I think NORAD or some other government agency will track your satallite and possibly even guide it for you if you for some small fee, that fee being something like they have access to your uplinks. I'm not 100% sure on it, but I suspect that once Irridium shuts down they will make sure the satallites cannot be used by anybody. I think there are a number of fears about people sniffing intelligence data to our spy satallites or determining where our spy satallites are. Perhaps someone else in the know knows the details on this.

    Whatever the reasons, I'm pretty sure they will just turn the satallites off and let them crash.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it but this one is mine..
  38. Donate them to The Open Source Movement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure we could find some fun use for them.

  39. Regarding Iridium by phil · · Score: 3

    I must say that for what Iridium did, it did well. Technically. (Since I worked on the software I'm not going to say it sucked ;-) It's just too bad that by the time Iridium came to market, the market didn't care!

    As far as the satellites are conserned, they will either (1) go in to safe mode then auto-deboost after some period of silence, or (2) Motorola will continue to spend money to command the satellites in order to control their descent so no one gets banged by space junk.

    I seriously doubt the constellation will be of much use for anything other than what it was designed for, since the satellites were built for cheap and Iridium would have liked to capitalize on any alternative use.

    1. Re:Regarding Iridium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously doubt the constellation will be of much use for anything other than what it was designed for, since the satellites were built for cheap and Iridium would have liked to capitalize on any alternative use.

      If they were so cheap, why was the service so expensive? It would seem that if they lowered the cost of ownership, they could have built up a much larger user base. Instead it appears they wanted to provide a service to the rich and milk them in the process.


    2. Re:Regarding Iridium by phil · · Score: 1

      Cheap is a relative term, of course. At around $50K per vehicle, the Iridium satellites were very inexpensive.

      The largest single-ticket expense was the cost of launching the constellation. Also, the development cost was several times what they had anticipated. The task turned out to be extremely difficult. No one had ever attempted to coordinate the operation of so many space vehicles so there was no way to judge the true cost.

      They were hardly trying to milk anyone. They knew that it was going to be a massively expensive project, but this was to be only the first of many such constellations. As such, Iridium was developed with an eye towards reuse. As any good engineer knows, this sort of project "investment" increases costs. That was the case here.

      It is too bad, really. The systems used to keep the constellation aloft work very well. And of course, the fact that the signal emitted constantly emitted by the satellites in order to allow the phones to locate them leaked into radio-astronomy frequencies was a problem.

  40. RIP for the satellites too ... by grefen · · Score: 1
  41. I don't want old satelites... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I want a Biscuit....

    Have you tried Powdermilk Biscuits?
    My, they're tasty, and expeditious...

    thank you.

  42. What about the customers? by emerson · · Score: 2

    Hmmn. A friend of mine _JUST_ bought an Iridium pager and service so that she could stay in touch for her 6+ month trip to the Near and Middle East. Now, less than a month after this purchase, the service is completely going away.

    Will she have some kind of recourse?

    Will she still have this recourse available several months from now, when she actually gets back to someplace with enough connectivity to file a claim?

    Enquiring minds want to know.


    --

    1. Re:What about the customers? by Brento · · Score: 2

      Your friend would be lucky to recoup anything. The company's been in financial trouble for months, and it was pretty widely known that they were in bankruptcy. It'd be somewhat akin to buying a Daewoo car and being surprised when you can't get parts at the local Napa store next year. (What, you didn't know they were $13b in the red either? Tssk tssk...)

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    2. Re:What about the customers? by matt_martin · · Score: 1

      Last I heard all sets will be re-purchased if the service is terminated. Though I heard they are commanding some hefty sums on E-bay as collectors items!

      --
      Lurking in the desert
    3. Re:What about the customers? by trave11er · · Score: 1

      Well, most concerned Iridium customers now must be two Swedish guys, who are currently trying to get to the North Pole by foot. I've read in a newspaper today, that due to Iridium shutdown they might loose two-way communication with outside world.

  43. Iridium = Uridium by stx23 · · Score: 1

    Ahh, nostalgia. In the 80's a bloke by the name of Andrew Braybrook wrote a C64 game named Uridium, fly over a satellite, shoot bits off it. I didn't realise it was training for real life...

  44. Space Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    According to space law one can not be held responsible for the damage an abandoned spacecraft causes. This means that an abandoned spacecraft can be subject to salvage by anyone who feels like it and has the means to do so.

    I am not a space law expert, but I did take up a course on space law in college as part my aerospace enigineering degree. During this course the professor gave us an exammple of such a situation in which a sovjet satellite with a nuclear reactor on board caused some damage to other spacecrafts. The sovjets could not be held responsible because they had officially abandoned the spacecraft. It ended up that others had to clean up the mess.

    So if these iridium satellites would be officially abandoned anyone who feels like it could try to "safe" them.

    "Basic research is what I am doing, when I don't know what I'm doing."
    Werner von Braun (The big boss at NASA a while back)

  45. Satellite Salvage by mlfallon · · Score: 0
    Hi

    Wasn't there a TV show in the 70's/80's with a similar theme, some guy who owned a salvage yard built his own rocket to salage all the stuff they left behind them on the moon.

    Maybe this could be the ultimate open source project, we already have the open source OS and tools, open source chip design, all we need now is a few open source rocket designs are we are on our way.

    NASA use Linux maybe they would like to help out, and the Russions have all that old equipment lying around.

    I think the TV show was called Salvage, and the main character was played by Andy Griffeth.

  46. How it all started (or so I hear) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Back in my scholar days (a few years ago) one of my profs talked about the Iridium project, involving 77 low-orbit satellites. The name came from the periodic table... 77 is Iridium (although they later scaled it back to 66 satellites).

    Apparently the orbit was so low that they predicted satellites would burn up in the atmosphere every 3 or 4 years, and they would just launch replacements as the others fell off. I remember thinking this was a pretty wasteful way to run a business, replacing your entire infrastructure every 4 years.

    Having never followed up on the company, I wonder if this is the way they ended up implementing it. If so, I'm guessing they'll just leave the space network as it is until it clears itself up.

  47. Reuters article with info on Iridium de-orbiting by jjo · · Score: 2

    Here is a Reuters article with information about the Iridium destruction plans.

  48. New Satellite comms company just started launching by michael.creasy · · Score: 2

    On Sunday ICO Global Communications is going to lanuch its first sat as part of a global moblie network

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid _673000/673221.stm

  49. Not to mention all thet is left stranded by Terao · · Score: 1

    A couple of adventurers here in sweden is trying to ski to the north pole and they are abadoned up in the arctic ice when iridium threw in the towel. Well they got some radio backup systems but kinda abandoned.

  50. Get rid of the satellites! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I hope they get rid of those satellites before some aliens get here. If the satellites stay up, it will be bad news. Then the alien mothership can hijack the abandon satellites to transmit a countdown attack sequence to all these big killer ships.

    1. Re:Get rid of the satellites! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont worry Brundle-Fly will save you with his PowerBook

  51. Sue the bastards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you sue them for putting that shit up in the sky? Clearly they could have designed them so they don't fuck with the pursuit of science.

  52. The bondholders will become shareholders. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bond holders, the people who lent Iridium money, will be the shareholders in a reorganized company. As long as they can pay the salaries of the people who work there, Iridium can go on. Perhaps the new management team can come up with a sleeker design for their phones. Motorola is finding out that it's cheaper to lay cable on the bottom of the ocean and along railroad tracks. GBLX !!!!!!!!!

  53. Self-destruction in one form or another by _Mustang · · Score: 1

    is the most typical end-of-life for decomissioned satelite. I don't mean that the device "spontaneously" blows up though it is not unheard of for the self-destruct to be issued. Most usual is that a course-change is issued which takes the satellite into a decayed orbit resulting in it's burning up in the atmosphere or more commonly landing in the ocean and breaking up on impact. This isn't usually problematic since these are hardly what anyone would call implementations of "advanced" or "secret" technology.
    The older generation originally cost as much as 1 Billion dollars to make and put into orbit which naturally included everything from actual manufacturing of the device to the cost of groundcrew and rocket fuel, so these will be a costly writeoff for someone. Moderm satellites have benefitted immensely from the advance of technology in all sectors and can cost as little as 100Million for the whole thing. Naturally it depends on whether the device is intended for Low-elevation or high-elevation orbit planes, but that just means that if the need to rebuild a satellite network arises it will cost much less for much more capability.
    The example I like to use is Anik E2, which up until recently was used for broadcasting C-band television signals versus the new "high-performance" NIMIQ satellite which broadcasts all digital signals. Both of these also broadcast radio and comm signals..

    1. Re:Self-destruction in one form or another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually the plan with Iridium, and they've already got the decommissioning budget of $60M as part of the bankruptcy settlement. I guess the liability of having so many satellites flying around is too high - cheaper to drop their orbit and have them slowly burn up than buy insurance for them. Plus all you wiley hackers thinking of "uses" for them doesn't help :).

  54. Maybe Iridium should be put on eBay? by CausticPuppy · · Score: 4

    Here we have 80+ satellites in orbit that nobody wants, and I still have to access the net at 56k.

    The world is full of irony.

    By the way, Heavens Above is a great place to look if you want to know when and where iridium flashes will take place. I'm sure those will be missed...

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    1. Re:Maybe Iridium should be put on eBay? by The+Archon · · Score: 1

      56K? And you're complaining? I'm on a 33.6 that thinks it's 26.4. Now all I need is some guy on a 14.4 to come along and make me feel like a jackass.... Then I guess I'll need to get my C64 with 2400 baud modem out and see if I can find something that makes it understand HTTP. We could have the first annual Slashdot Bandwidth Limbo! How low can YOU go?

      And re: the Iridium flares, or whatever. Those shouldn't stop unless the satellites are commanded to move or to close the reflecting whatsits that IIRC cause the flares.

    2. Re:Maybe Iridium should be put on eBay? by CausticPuppy · · Score: 2

      I wonder what they'll do with the satellites if there's no buyer. Burn 'em up in the atmosphere? No more flares then.

      If the sats are shut down, and if their attitudes are no longer being monitored/controlled from the ground, the flares will no longer be predictable.
      Right now, they have to be predicted, because a flare can do some serious damage to sensitive telescope equipment... or at least cause some pain to an observer!

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    3. Re:Maybe Iridium should be put on eBay? by MstrFool · · Score: 1

      how low? I still have a working 300bps modem {used a 9 volt for the PWS}.. I just can't find any one that will alow a connection that slow.

      --
      Question reality.
    4. Re:Maybe Iridium should be put on eBay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh...that sucks...I'm on FDDI :)

    5. Re:Maybe Iridium should be put on eBay? by Markar · · Score: 1

      If it is put on E-Bay for sale, maybe one of the psychic or sex line companies will buy it up. Their customers are already paying outrageous amounts of money, what's a few more $/minute to them? Motorola just didn't market it right :-)

      --
      "Open code, in other words, can be a check on state power." -Lawrence Lessig
    6. Re:Maybe Iridium should be put on eBay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, sell them on EBay as the ultimate gift, just imagine giving someone a satellite for Xmas and having it named after them.

    7. Re:Maybe Iridium should be put on eBay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my low bandwidth idea: the computer uses some voice synthesizer to say "one" and "zero" through a pair of cans connected by a string. A computer with a mic then decodes these signals and sends them to the internet. How slow would this be? 1 bps?

    8. Re:Maybe Iridium should be put on eBay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then the interference steps in:

      "One", comes out the other end as "Zoone"

      "Do not understand 'Zoone'. Repeat."

      "Do not understand 'unnrstansoone'. Repeat."

      "Do not understand 'Repat'. Repeat."

  55. Salvage 1 by jonabbey · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it was the weirdest thing I had ever seen. Very much influenced by BattleStar Galactica, as I recall.. they were out at about the same time.

    The internet is great, the internet is good, the internet has a Salvage 1 Fan Page.

  56. Sad by drivers · · Score: 1

    It's kind of like the pony express I suppose.

    The problem of course is the phones and airtime were too expensive, and they didn't work indoors.

    I have a poster up in my house called "The Spirit of Iridium." Looks like that is all it is going to be... an idea.

  57. iridium by Uart · · Score: 1

    if iridium doesn't get aquired, then they stated earlier that they are going to (after the 17th) start working on how to safely de-orbit their satellites. According to an article I read, too bad i don't remember where, or I would post a link there. Maybe C|net?

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
  58. Iridium Sat #7 on Ebay by Duke+of+URL · · Score: 1

    [Humor]

    Which one of us will be the first to put a prank EBay auction on one or all of the Iridium Satellites?

    All that money burning up in the atmosphere....

    [/humor]

  59. Maybe they are owned by the share holders by TheDeal · · Score: 1

    Dear or dear they should auction them off on ebay, i'm sure the russians could scrounge up some US Foriegn aid money to pay for them. And then disperse the money to the poor share holders of this doomed company

    1. Re:Maybe they are owned by the share holders by Pyotri · · Score: 1

      The Russians don't have any of the US Foreign aid money. It's all been siphoned off by the politicians/mafia/oligarchy.

  60. yeah, right, tell the world . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I saw someone who looked like McCain at Motorola in Phoenix just today!

    no you didn't. STFU, okay? now. you didn't see anything, anywhere. nothing. period. in fact, you weren't in phoenix. trust me, you weren't. got it?

    they wheeled it out on a fork lift.

    i can categorically and absolutely deny any truth whatsoever to this report. it did not happen. period. got it? senator mccain was not at the motorola facility in phoenix. there is no truth to reports which suggest the contrary. those are unsubstantiated rumors, which are not only libelous but in fact very close to treason, as sen. mccain is a high government official and you are making some very serious allegations here -- allegations which are, as i've said, absolutely unfounded.

    What could be going on?

    i think we've discussed this enough.

    1. Re:yeah, right, tell the world . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL! And I thought they moderated this out because the moderators are humorless turds. But I'm seeing a bigger picture now. Ummm... On second thought, I'm not seeing anything. Never mind. Hey! Leave me alone!

  61. I have one word for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Cidera. (Look at www.cidera.com) for those that don't know already. Nevertheless, I know some people who were at the "closing of the doors" and they said that the gear was "Gateway" gear--not sure if the same Gateway as the commercials with The Who in the background, I wasn't that involved.

  62. The logic behind abandoning billions etc... by underwhelm · · Score: 1

    Tax writeoff.

    --

    I don't need large brains to have a good time.

  63. Free Shipping! by NSupremo · · Score: 1

    I figure these satellites could be sold. Free shipping would be a plus. The only catch would be they could only be delivered to the water and they can only promise accurate delivery within 7500 miles :) (oh, and AS IS)

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._Election_co ntroversies_and_irregularities
    1. Re:Free Shipping! by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      Actually, they could get within a couple of hundred miles. Buyer is responsible for stopping the package, though.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  64. Uhmmmmm, bondholders??? by unicorn · · Score: 1

    Typically when a company goes under, the assets (things like accounts recievable, and oh... satellites for example) become the property of the secured creditors. So the people that loaned money to Iridium, will have first dibs on the birds. Then once they are made whole (paid back, as if that will happen), the suppliers are in line next to get a chunk of the assets. Then once everyone that loaned money to the company is happy, the investors get what's left.

    My guess would be, that the bondholders would be able to sell off the satellites for some other purpose, but I wouldn't expect them to be cut loose as space-salvage.

    --
    "Politicians are interested in people. Not that this is always a virtue. Fleas are interested in dogs." P.J. O'Rourke
  65. Re: Space Junk by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 3
    If you take out a sattelite, you run a decent chance of leaving MORE debris in space than you start with.

    Specifically, depending on how you "take it out", you are likely to introduce a lot of orbital debris. An energetic disassembly (i.e., you blow it up) will result in many small particles being spread out with a broad range of directions and velocities. Many of these will be directed into the atmosphere, where they'll burn up. Many will be directed out into space: if they have sufficient velocity, they'll leave the earth system, however, most will assume a very "tall" elliptical orbit and will burn up in the atmosphere when trying to approach perigee.

    But there is a class of the particles that will remain in orbit. These will often have an interesting orbital dynamic in that they'll all have orbital foci at the point of the detonation and at the opposite point on the orbital sphere.

    For more information, and some diagrams, look up references to the disastrous Haystack project.

    Also, remember that objects in orbit are (not surprisingly) moving at orbital velocity, which is quite fast. Even a small particle or fleck of paint is an amazing kinetic energy weapon at that speed -- especially if you're in a different orbit, and the net vector adds. There are some scary pictures of aluminum portions of the Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF) that were badly pitted or blasted through by debris that was 1mm or smaller.

    That's why the shuttle always tries to keep the narrow profile (keep tangent to the orbital sphere). It's also why you couldn't get me out on a space walk!

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  66. Iridium can support Data Transmission - Poorly by sysop · · Score: 1

    AFAIK, Iridium cannot support data transmission --which is the primary reason McCaw opted not to bail them out, since he can't use their birds for Teledesic.

    The Iridium Satellite communications systems are essentially beefed up GSM towers. Apparently, many of the parts and even model numbers are the same as those you see irradiating your neighbourhood. Some of the Iridium phones claimed to support 2400 baud communications, and we all know that 8kbps is required for a reasonable digital voice transmission.
    Also keep in mind that an unreliable and slow connection like this would be almost unusable with TCP (which was never designed with satellite communications in mind).
    It would really only be useful in remote areas, or for people who move around a lot, the same reason Iridium was created in the first place. Obviously this is not a profitable business model.

  67. Last I checked by Cyan+I.C. · · Score: 1

    Last I checked space law... (about 3 years ago) anything in geosynchronous orbit above a country if not already owned can be claimed by that country in a widening airspace according to the height of orbit. I don't know if this is applicable anymore due to an interesting set of legislation about the issue due to certain corps. testing the legality.

    --
    "Arrogance and Stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you." - Londo Mollari, Babylon 5.
    1. Re:Last I checked by gaudior · · Score: 1

      Iridium are not in Geo-Synchronous orbit. They are only a few hundred miles up. Geo orbits are around 22,000 miles.

    2. Re:Last I checked by Cyan+I.C. · · Score: 1

      Ahh thanks for clearing that up, I wasn't sure whether they were geo or not.

      --
      "Arrogance and Stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you." - Londo Mollari, Babylon 5.
  68. McCaw, still sees a wireless future? by cloudscout · · Score: 1
    According to this News.com article Craig McCaw, an early cellular pioneer who's name is synonymous with wireless telephones, along with his Eagle River investment group recently backed off on their plans to buy out Iridium. McCaw is already busy with sattelite communications, though. He and Bill Gates have backed a company you may have heard of called Teledisc. The plan is to develop a network of low-orbit sattelites designed to give seemless wireless data networking worldwide.

    Enter Ignition. Another News.com article mentions the new wireless investment group started by former Microsoft execs and McCaw Cellular execs. About $140 million was initially invested by Qualcomm among others... I wonder if they're considering stepping up to the plate to acquire the sattelites. Could they be thinking about competing against their former figureheads? I know I'd be more comfortable with competition in the worldwide wireless data market... especially where Gates is involved.

    1. Re:McCaw, still sees a wireless future? by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Mccaw wanted to buy Iridium, but motorola stepped in and wanted billions more for stock holders and bills. (Smooth move motorola...)

      Now Mccaw can wait a year, its contracts are up and go with a nice little boeing spinoff for 1/3rd the price.

      And as for the MS wireless project, its using AT&Ts cdpd network. (Formally Macaw)

      Teledesic wont start operation till 2004 or so.
      (64Meg/sec download baby, oh yeah)

      AT&T will have GPRS 128K wireless (per channel) by summer 2002. They are installing the network today.

      -Brook Harty
      --
      how about a +3 :)

  69. Technical info on sats + ham radio by RancidPickle · · Score: 5

    Someone was interested in Ham Radio use of the sats (like the Phase 3D or Oscars). There's a lot of them up there (66 Iridium sats), but they're out of frequency. Also, they're right in the LEOsat hotspots for spectrum use, so I don't doubt that they'll re-farm them out or resell them.

    Satellites: 66
    Orbital Planes: 6
    Orbit Height: 780 km (these are LEOsats)
    Inclination of Orbital Planes: 86.4
    Orbital Period: 100 min. 28 sec.
    Lifetime: 5 to 8 years
    Frequencies and Rates
    Telephone and Messaging Service Links are 1616 - 1626.5 MHz (L-Band)
    Intersatellite Links are 23.18 - 23.38 GHz (Ka-Band)
    Ground Segment Links:
    Downlinks: 19.4 - 19.6 GHz (Ka-Band)
    Uplinks: 29.1-29.3 GHz (Ka-Band)
    Digital Voice, Fax, and Data are transmitted at 2.4 Kbps

    --
    "First things first, but not necessarily in that order."
    - Doctor Who
  70. Observing satellites and satellite "flashing"... by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

    Actually, I've seen quite a few satellite "flashes."

    The first was when I was very young, and I thought I was seeing a UFO.

    You can observe the phenomena yourself. The best time is to look after sunset, when there is a minimal amount of light over the horizon, and stars are out. Look straight up, or slightly to the west. A new moon makes a much better night to observe satellites.

    Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites are quite visible during the above times, and you can spot them as a quick moving object about as bright as a dim star. If you follow one on it's path, if you are lucky you might see it "flash" as a flat panel catches the sun. This isn't very common, but more common with the Iridium birds. If you are VERY lucky, you may observe an even rarer sight: A rotating satellite that continally "flashes." I've only seen this once. I was in Oklahoma at the time.

    --
    "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  71. Abandoned? I don't think so. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iridium may be going under, but I seriously doubt that Motorola's going to relinquish rights to infrastructure they've paid for. They'll either try to find some way to get their investment back, or failing that, sell the satellite network to the highest bidder.

    Anyone care to buy a global cellphone network? US $20 billion (Cheap). Who knows how much Iridium would be worth to the right party. If it ever was sold at a serious discount to its original price the acquiring company would have all the assets of Iridium with none of the debts.

  72. Use for wireless networking by forkspoon · · Score: 1

    These can be used for wireless networking if they will accept broadcast input. Each person would have to have a large dish, with a possibly very powerful signal, a possible safety concern. However, current dish-based wireless reaches 11mbps for about $500. If the fees were low ($15-30), I could go for that. It won't happen though, becuase satellite maintainence is pricy, and launch costs increase the price of each satellite by several million dollars, making it way too expensive for enough users to run it even if it could be done. Travis forkspoon@hotmail.com

  73. What will happen to the satellites (from space.com by McMac · · Score: 1

    Motorola's Wyman says that the company has a "very controlled process" for bringing down the satellites. "They will be brought down in stages, not all at once," he said.

    It is expected to take a few years for all 66 satellites to come down.

    Check out http://www.space.c om/space/business/iridium_motorola_000308.html for the full story :)

  74. Short term problem? by El · · Score: 1

    The Iridium webpage says these sattelites have an expected lifetime of 5 to 8 years. But I thought low-earth orbits decayed in a couple years. Anyone know how long we've got till these high-tech swords of Damoclese re-enter the atmosphere, and you absorbs the liability if the land on say... Bill Gates new house?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  75. What's the capacity of Iridium? by joshamania · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know how many channels that these satellites will support? I used to do satcom for the USAF, and it probably wouldn't be too hard to communicate with the satellite. The big problem would be getting information about the actual satellite like: What uplink and downlink freqs they use, how many channels can they handle at once, what is the data rate at which they talk to each other (yeah, yeah, I know it's prolly analog), what type of multiplexing do they use, et al.

    Big problem: Uncle Sam is going to get his hands on those things before anyone else, so good luck finding any info on how to control the satellites. You're going to need a lot more equipment than just a phone and it's 2400bps data stream.

    Big problem 2: If nobody claims those puppies, they will probably have to bring them down. Maybe we can convince them to bring them all down over the U.S. during the evening on the 4th of July! We'd have our first man made meteor shower!

    1. Re:What's the capacity of Iridium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Iridium System uses FDMA/TDMA modulation (The band is divided into frequency channels which are in turn divided into timeslots.)

      User terminals communicate with the satellites in the L-band, while the Ka-band is used for intersatellite links and gateway (ground-station) communications. The crosslinks operate from 23.18GHz-23.38 GHz at 12.5MBps using Time Division Duplexing.

      The theoretical capacity of the network is 3168 beams, due to polar interference maximum in use at one time is 2150.

    2. Re:What's the capacity of Iridium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting idea. Here's mu take. With the iridium birds just aching to handle some traffic, we should set up an open source / hack force movement to provide international data comms at no cost to, well, to ourselves. Why not use the internet? sure. we should. but there are gaps in coverage. big gaps. iridium could fill those gaps. I used to do satcom in the Navy, and we used a device called the DAMA (Demand Assigned Multiple Access). It was a FDMA / TDMA combo, like iridium. overall, we got quite a respectable data throughput on just one satellite. Something like 10 Mbps under optimum conditions. The mux and the transceiver were seperate units, but that specification changed over to miniDAMA which combined these two elements. miniDAMA is a COTS (Ccommon, Off The Shelf) project, which means that the goods are available to us, if we have the smarts to design it. So, we turn iridium to the common good by integrating it with the internet. Ground based routers would provide routing for currently uncovered sections (special class of ip's???). Even though iridium talks about 2400 bps data, heck. I can't imagine them churing up bandwidth that way. Much more efficient to digitize everything, and then use the mux to modulate a PSK signal (Phase Shift Keyed). 1 hertz bandwidth requirement, built-in data compression. High through put. This dama-esque device could actually be a god-send for rural areas. It could provide local co-op based, high speed internet connections to places still untouched by cable, DSL, etc. Many of those still exist. In fact, a co-op could operate it for the cost of the electricity to run the thing. Possibly even cheaper than your DSL connection (or mine). Just imagine, one dama per 200 households...essentially free reasonably high speed connections to the 'net, through the iridium constellation. I think I should go register the freeIridium.org name now. later gang.

    3. Re:What's the capacity of Iridium? by xmedar · · Score: 1

      What about running it for charities / NGOs around world, allowing them to report daily on activities, or for third world communications, allowing weekly updates on sponsored children, remote village life etc.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
  76. Judge Order Satellites "DeOrbited" by rambone · · Score: 2

    The company cannot leave the satellites there. They will be brought back down and burnup by judicial order. It is unclear how this will be paid for.

  77. Bankruptcy settlement REQUIRES "deorbiting" by rambone · · Score: 3

    The judge has mandated that Iridium or its creditors "deorbit" the satellites, although it was not clear who was going to pay for this.

  78. Just saw Iridium 16 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    After reading the article I loaded up my Heavens-above iridium flare page and went out and saw my first iridum flare!

    It was a beautiful -6 mag flare. Truely cool, thanks slashdot. :)

  79. Do what NASA did by drix · · Score: 2

    Crash them into Earth and search for intelligent life. (Good luck finding any). Or, better yet, watch the president of Iridium start taking potshots at his mother-in-law's house starting around 11:55PM ;)

    --

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    1. Re:Do what NASA did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the US government could buy them as land them on Fidel Castro, might work better than the exploding cigar.

  80. Extraplanetary Communication by ChrisBennett · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can figure out a way to move these suckers into orbit around the Moon or Mars to use for communication on the surface. Astronauts on cell phones- I knew it would happen.

  81. What are the costs ? by FurryLogic · · Score: 1


    ...of keeping the program running ? Obviously, scratch on the initial capital investment (esp if they're talking bringing them down), but would setting the airtime cost to something reasonable to stimulate consumer interest ever make it profitable ?

    If it's simply too much ahead of its time, would simply suspending the program and bring it back later be feasible (and profitable) ?

    I'm sure there's a need, just not at current costs for consumer.

    -fl

  82. Oh my god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...they killed Iridium!

    You bastards!!!

  83. Space Law and Admiralty by werdna · · Score: 3

    For an excellent on-line collection of relevant international documents and statutes relating to space law, check out the Archimedes web site. A survey of applicable treaties can be found at the Space web site.

    An article on the point raised in the note is: "Emerging law of outer space - the analogy of maritime salvage" / Almond, Harry H., Jr. / 19 J. OF SPACELAW #1, 1991, P67. You should be able to find this in most law school libraries.

    The problem with the salvage analogy is that there is at present no legal mechanism for a nation to absolve its responsibility for objects placed into outer space. There doesn't really seem to be legal recognition of abandoned property in space. I understand that the prohibitions against military operations in the Outer Space Treaty have been argued to preclude private salvage as well. This is not to say that salvage is prohibited, only that interest in any property rights to the salvage estate are unclear.

    Though I practice intellectual property law, these remarks should be considered coming from a lay person -- I have absolutely no real clue what is going on in these space law/admiralty issues beyond a rudimentary understanding of the Space Patent Act.

    1. Re:Space Law and Admiralty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do whatever you want to satellites in outer space, I don't believe there is any jurisdiction over them, however, you're guaranteed harassment on Earth if you go around breaking them.

  84. Satellite Auction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Irridium owes a lot of people a lot of money. It'll be sold to try and repay some of that. Someone else will buy the satellites at a bargain price, and without the massive debt burden and some realistic pricing (Irridium was ridiculously overpriced; completing ignoring the cheap competition from roaming GSM) they'll be able to offer an affordable and hopefully profitable service. (Remember just because a company files for Chapter 11 doesn't mean every Billy Bob with a Pickup Truck can descend on head office and take whatever isn't nailed down!)

    So lets start the bidding; I bid $150 for all the satelites, and $25 for the ground stations.

    Wonder if ebay will carry this?

  85. Satellite lifetime by mlanett · · Score: 1

    The problem with Iridium was that their satellites only had a 5+ year lifetime, of which 2+ is now used. So a buyer was looking at a lifetime of 3 years before they had to start replacing the entire constellation (88 or so?). Not very smart.

    Any anyway, as someone else has pointed out, Iridium will have to deorbit them at the end of their lifetime or before, presumably at company shutdown time.

  86. not abandoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iridium has already announced they will be retrieving the satellites over the next 7 months.

    1. Re:not abandoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they won't. It's just too fuckin expensive to send a guy (or gal) out there to grab the satellites and take them back. The satellites aren't worth as much as a shuttle mission would cost.

  87. Anti-satellite? by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    The only anti-satellite device which could be tested on them is one which gently grabs it and then changes its speed (slower or faster won't matter, once it gets out of its orbit it will tend to hit the atmosphere soon).

    The simplest would be a remotely controlled drone with a net and conductive weighted wires -- the net for satellite capture when speed almost matched, then release weights and any tumbling will pull the wires out; the conductive wires generate electricity due to the Earth's magnetic field and slow the whole thing down.

    But first someone has to build and launch a bunch of the things...

  88. If you really love the idea - there's an option. by strat · · Score: 1

    If you really love the idea of a universal mobile phone, check out Globalstar. They're just getting started, but the prices are better than Iridium, and the hardware looks MUCH more straightforward.

    Because they're just getting going, all of the resellers, save one, pretty much have the same hardware prices and the same rate plans, but $1500 for a phone and $1.30-$1.70 a minute is a heck of a lot better than either the Iridium inital pricing or the Inmarsat stuff. I've seen AMPS carriers with roaming rates close to that at times!

    The phone doesn't look like a bad art school/masonry project either. (The Iridium phones had huge hulking cradles for making the satellite part work, which seemed a bit kludgy.)

    Qualcomm is making them a pretty spiffy phone for Globalstar that speaks CDMA 800/AMPS/Global*.

    The one area where Iridium's ridiculous overengineering was nice was that you pretty much had one phone # that would follow you anywhere. G* doesn't have that kind of switch integration yet, so you have to have a CDMA/AMPS # and a Globalstar #, but you can certainly call forward
    between them.

    G* just lit up service in late February, so it's a bit early to tell how things will fare, but they seem to be doing things right for a large-scale market approach.

    By the way, I tried one of the Iridium phones, and found the audio quality to be pretty nice. It was GSM after all, so I expected it to be decent. I'm not sure how G*'s CDMA will sound, but their satellites are in lower orbits, so the latency should be less than Iridium's which was almost imperceptible to me. (Echo cancellers have improved much since the days of crossbar switches.)

    I don't work for G* or anything, but I expect to be a customer RSN.

  89. Auction the satellites by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Recent Iridium stories have mentioned auctioning, but as the corporation seems to have run out of funding there is even less chance of funding. There has been speculation at this point that companies who are interested in the Iridium system will wait for bankruptcy, then negotiate for the assets at a cut rate. Others have noted that everyone already knows they're desperate and any one interested can negotiate right now.

  90. Conspiracy Theory by Phuzzy_Lodgik · · Score: 1

    Has anyone thought about the connection between iridium's failure and the fact that it was the one of (very) few methods of communication (that had the potential for widespread use) that the NSA couldn't intercept reliably? Just a thought...

  91. All is fine at the Iridium website... by EverCode · · Score: 1

    On their website, there is no mention of the problems, no signs of discontinued service. Hell, I could even order something from their online store tonight if I wanted to.

    Seems a little strange to me...

    EC

    --

    EverCode
  92. Out Standing In Its Field (an obituary) by isdnip · · Score: 3
    Iridium may have finally met its untimely end. Motorola's dream of a satphone system, paid for by foolish investors but not customers, never really had a chance.

    Besides the price, Iridium had performance issues. It was based on GSM, but its link power budget limited the net bit rate to 2400, which meant that the voice quality wasn't so hot. And its data applications are somewhat limited, though by no means nonexistent (not everything is fast web browsing!).

    But it didn't work in a car. It didn't work indoors. It didn't even work well through leafy trees, or if buildings were in the way. It was for people who were "out standing in their field."

    They designed it before cell phones were widely available around the world, and continued to build it for business travelers even after that market no longer needed them. They designed it with complex sat-to-sat relaying, bypassing cheap terrestrial fiber optics. Again, a 1985 design decision gone bad. These errors add up.

    It was called Iridium because that precious metal is element number 77, and there were to be 77 satellites in the original constellation. They later lowered it to 66, a decision which might have strained its performance budget even more than it saved on cost... but they didn't change which element it was named for. How fitting, though, that element 66 is named Dysprosium. (Other slashdotters are invited to check out its etymology.)

    1. Re:Out Standing In Its Field (an obituary) by myshka · · Score: 1

      Dysprosium

      Etymology: New Latin, from Greek dysprositos hard to get at

      Pretty sad indeed.

  93. I take that back.... by EverCode · · Score: 2

    Look in the upper right-hand corner of this page:

    http://www.iridium.com/docs/copyright.ht ml

    I don't think they implied the meaning to be what we are thinking! Haha!

    EC

    --

    EverCode
  94. Flaimbait?? by delmoi · · Score: 1

    Offtopic maybe but it isn't really even that. The only moderation this deserves is +1 funny.

    [ c h a d o k e r e ]

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  95. BEHOLD by delmoi · · Score: 1

    The great power that is the slashdot dumbass. Able to change reality with a single false assumption... assumptions that propagate like viruses acrost the sea of idiocy!

    [ c h a d o k e r e ]

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
    1. Re:BEHOLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was, of course, intended to be posted as AC....

    2. Re:BEHOLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be so sure they'll deorbit them.

      Why don't you flame with your real account. Why do you care about your karma?

  96. Flamebait?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offtopic maybe but it isn't really even that. The only moderation this deserves is +1 funny.

  97. Conspiracy Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unsuccessful? Abandoned?

    Where are the paranoid? Perhaps Iridium was wildly successful :-) Maybe it was all a ruse to get military satellites/weapons platforms into space.

    Now that the satellites are up, no point in continuing with the ruse.

    :-)

  98. Bunch of satellite notes by Bryce · · Score: 3
    But if Iridium's satellites are a nuisance to astronomers, is it merely because of the way they were made? What if, instead, they were not made of reflective material?

    The reflective material is most likely used for thermal control. Without it the spacecraft would most likely become too hot and burn out. Yes, there are other cooling mechanisms, but making a surface reflective is pretty darn cheap and easy.

    The handful of iridium satellites is nothing compared to all the other debris and satellites that we have put in orbit - if iridium satellites are such nuisances to astronomers, then what about all the other ones?

    Who says they aren't? ;-) Seriously, though, most satellites are in orbits that aren't such a problem:

    GeoSynchronous Earth Orbits (GEO) are way the hell away from the earth, and orbiting at the equator, and really easy for astronomers to avoid. The satellites are also in predictable places in the sky (by design). There are many hundreds of satellites in the GEO ring. These are the satellites you have the most immediate contact with - pagers, cable TV, satellite TV, etc.

    Polar or Sun Synchronous satellites (weather satellites and land imaging, for instance) are in orbits that run north-to-south and generally pass overhead only very infrequently, and very quickly. Usually there's only a few satellites in these sorts of orbits.

    LEO satellites, like Iridium, are pretty common. They're used for a whole host of different applications. I suppose theoretically any of these would pose the same problems as Iridium to astronomers, however they are usually at altitudes where they move too fast or too slow for them to be much of a problem. Iridium is a bit different in that it is a "Constellation". By *design* you're supposed to always have one in view; their velocity is set such that it "maximizes" the problem to astronomers. ;-) I don't know if there are currently other constellation systems like Iridium in orbit, but I know there's been a bunch designed on paper (I should know, I helped design a few).

    You may find this an interesting irony... Hubble is in one of these LEO orbits (so that the shuttle can get to it). So one of the things fouling up the Earth-based telescopes is a better telescope. ;-) (Actually, Hubble is at a low enough orbit that it probably moves too quickly to be much of a problem, but there's other telescopes up there.)

    Is there a set of rules for satellite construction? I'm sure there some rules that everyone follows loosely. Is there an international organization that regulates satellite launch schedules? I'm sure there is, it's too important for there not to be any.

    Lots of red tape. Remember, your government has had its hand in this industry since its inception. ;-)

    If satellites were problems to astronomers, should we be concerned about all the satellite launches that seem to happen all the time?

    From an astronomy standpoint, no, I wouldn't worry. Let me explain.

    First, consider that the vast majority of satellites are going into orbits that for one reason or another won't be a problem. Period.

    Second, step back and give thought to how astronomy has developed and evolved. Long ago, we knew so little about the heavens that a simple telescope out the window of a city apartment could generate a vast wealth of scientific data. As they gathered more data and started looking for higher quality images they were forced to move out of the cities, eventually to remote islands and mountaintops, in order to find clear, light-polution-free skies. Would it have made any sense to restrict electric lights in cities simply for astronomer's benefits?

    Today, to achieve the major scientific advancements scientists are having to go into space orbit. Nothing we can trace to ourselves as the fault - it's the atmosphere itself that's at issue, this time. Does it make any more sense to hinder commercial spacecraft than it would have to place controls on electric lighting?

    I've had the opportunity to work on some conceptual designing for the next generation telescopes. Very cool things are being designed for the new "mountaintops". In fact, NGST (Next Generation Space Telescope) is being designed to orbit a gravitational anomaly! Check it out: http://www.trw.com/ngst/ (My job is to come up with a propulsion system that'll keep it orbiting this point, without fouling the optics, and is as efficient as possible.)

    Certainly, the iridium satellites can be put to use doing something, otherwise we'd just billions of dollars of floating space junk?

    Perhaps... However it's not like we can retrofit them with radar sensors or something. I'm sure within a few months we'll hear some novel new use for them, but these spacecraft were pretty optimized for the task and business model they were set for.

    I must say that for what Iridium did, it did well. Technically. (Since I worked on the software I'm not going to say it sucked ;-) It's just too bad that by the time Iridium came to market, the market didn't care!

    Iridium had a few more launch failures than planned, but yes, the system as a whole worked pretty much as planned (as far as I know). It overlooked the massive drop in cell phone costs, as well as the rise of the Internet.

    As far as the satellites are conserned, they will either (1) go in to safe mode then auto-deboost after some period of silence, or (2) Motorola will continue to spend money to command the satellites in order to control their descent so no one gets banged by space junk.

    The satellites will (eventually) decay and burn up in the orbit no matter what anyone does. The orbit is high enough that this won't happen any time soon (unlike the space station, which is at such a low altitude that it'll fall back to Earth if you so much as look at it crosseyed. I don't think the satellites have sufficient fuel to conduct a controlled reentry, but it doesn't matter - these things are small enough that they'll burn up completely before coming anywhere near the ground.

    1. Re:Bunch of satellite notes by GrassyNoel · · Score: 1

      ::First, consider that the vast majority of satellites are going into orbits that for one reason or another won't be a problem. Period::

      Until they re-enter over Western Australia :-)

      cheers
      Neil

      --
      Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.
  99. What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me that destroying them would be a terrible waste...sounds like they could live happily up there for almost 7 more years. They should donate the system to the UN Peace Keepers or the Red Cross, or Educational / Scientific groups that require communications in the field. Just reprogram the system to disable all billing/call acocunting set a limit of 10 minutes per call and go nuts. It could be a multi-billion $$$$ write-off for the company and great humanitarian gesture. Why waste it?

  100. Haystack project? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I can't find anything about a 'disastrous Haystack project. There's a Haystack observatory that's mentioned that is capable of traking small debris (2mm and larger), but nothing that seems to pass as what you described.

    1. Re:Haystack project? by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1
      I believe it was in the early 60s. A defense project launched a bundle of several million needles into orbit to use as a signal reflector.

      This was attempted several times (or at least twice). One of the needle distribution payloads failed to deploy ... until many years later. The needles performed very very poorly as a reflector.

      Sorry this is all so vague. My source of this information is out of town. As soon as he's back, I'll post the specifics (if anyone's interested).

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    2. Re:Haystack project? by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 1
      I apologize.

      I had the name wrong. It was the West Ford project, back in 1961 and 1963.

      For information on it, either do this google search, or visit the following direct reference.

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
  101. There are lots of low-bandwidth applications by btempleton · · Score: 1

    The receiver will sell the satellites to somebody. There are too many useful applications for them, not just continuing to run them as a cheaper satellite phone service.

    They could probably do satellite radio, for example. National (or regional as you wish, or global) stations that don't fade as you move from town to town. Plus updates on road conditions, weather etc. for your car or marine computer.

    Great for lojack GPS location transmission for trucks, marine, aircraft.

    Useful for voice and data on planes going over the ocean.

    Voice and low-rate data for truly remote locations.

    "Stop the Atrocity" -- build digital cameras combined with Iridium phones. Airdrop them on war zones. Tell the victims of atrocities to snap digital snapshots of anybody who attacks them or any atrocity they see for instant upload. The mere existence of these cameras and their link to the press might be enough to stop some war crimes. Isn't that worth it? Imagine having them in Kosovo, Sarajevo, Tibet?

    Low-volume remote transmissions from things like scientific sensors of climate, air pollution data.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  102. Scenario by chuckw · · Score: 1


    In the event that Iridium service becomes unavailable, we would be happy to talk to you about other possible communications solutions.


    Well the reason I would have one of these phones is because I'm going someplace that doesn't have phones. So how the heck am I supposed to talk to them about my service being unavailable?


    --
    Quantum Linux Laboratories - Accelerating Business with Linux
    * Education
    * Integration
    * Support

    --
    *Condense fact from the vapor of nuance*
  103. Mars Missions Cheap! by [null] · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just tweak the orbits to sling the satellites at Mars and crash 'em in to the planet? I mean, jeez, NASA could do this, and probably get all those satellites cheap, and that way we're not spending $100M on some damn thing that was supposed to *land* on the planet. With luck, we can make the Martians eat flaming death and get revenge for them waxing so many of our spacecraft! Hell, spare a few for the moon! Maybe if it was done right, you could carve some company's logo into the surface of the moon with them. Hell, lash them to the ISS and reuse whatever parts you can, like the solar panels... come on, burning these things up in the atmosphere is only going to leave more junk in space, so why not fling them away from the earth?

  104. Geostationary, Low Earth Orbit, Computer & Voice by Baldrson · · Score: 3
    Ka-band has enormous potential. Circa 1984 I gave a presentation at the Ruben H. Fleet science center for the L5 Society on an idea for a 5 geostationary orbit satellite system based on optical intersat links and Ka-band ground links. This was to be a computer network derived from the mass market technology we had put into production for the Plato system at Control Data Corporation four years earlier. I figured processing power would be cheap enough in about 10 years (1994) to allow us to move the equivalent of Cyber 7600 mainframes, then capable of supporting around 7000 simultaneous graphical users each at 1/4 response time, into orbit with plenty of redundancy. My projections were just about right, except for the optical links. It was a little "ahead of its time", as is most of the technology I've worked on, and the WWW came along to make central processors seem useless. At that time, some guy at Rockwell International, I don't recall his name right now, was really hot on low earth orbit networks for voice communications. I had some discussions with him about why I thought computer networks held more promise and that geostationary orbit made more sense for computer networks. Voice delay suffers noticably with geostationary orbit distance because you are interacting through a distance of 88,000 miles (22,000*4, speak, up, down, respond, up, down) at 180,000 miles per second for the speed of light in vacum. With client server interactions, however, you can get away with only 44,000 miles (22,000*2) round-trip if you put your server in geostationary orbit -- and that falls within the 1/4 second annoyance threshold of humans. You can actually afford to send and receive every key press assuming you have the processing power at the server. This single-key echoing was close to the interaction model used on Plato for real-time multiuser games -- the most demanding applications of that system (a lot of the early game industry was simply Plato games ported to PCs in single user mode).

    Then in 1991, following on my legislative successes in space commercialization I went to work with E'Prime Aerospace as Vice President of Public Affairs. I took on that job because they had a potential customer (Norris Satellite Communications -- run by a Dutch Amish expatriate from my ancestral county of Lancaster Pennsylvania) who wanted to launch a geostationary Ka Band satellite called "Norstar", but he couldn't get the license thorugh the FCC. There had never been a Ka Band satellite licensed and there was a lot of conflict over letting this Amish character have the first crack at commercializing the Milstar technology (NASA likes people to think ACTS was the pioneer in Ka band, but even thought ACTS was launched first, the Harris ECL satellite switching guys Norris used did their pioneering work with Milstar, not ACTS). Anyway, to make a long story short, we managed to get the FCC licensing dislodged and the first Ka band satellite license was awarded to Norris, the Amish dude. The satellite specifications called for multiple geostationary Ka band satellites with onboard switching of time division multiplexed spot beams that would allow you to adaptively switch the power (both informational and energetic) to various geographic hotspots as needed. This was getting close to what I had predicted as a geostationary computer network, because the ECL switches were systems that Seymour Cray himself would have respected, and the spot beams made it feasible to load-level much more effectively to stationary ground dishes only inches in diameter. If Cray's gallium arsenide switches, developed for the Cray-4, had made it into production, I think the systems could have been a lot high capacity at lower power while retaining their radiation hard characteristics.

    Unfortunately, Norris's satellite system was to go the way of another Norris's (William) Plato system -- to the "before its time" scrap heap of history. The Calling Communications Corporation guys who were cursing me at the 1993 Small Satellite Conference in Logan, UT for grabbing their coveted Ka band first eventually, along with Iridium, got it reallocated. Calling Communications Corporation eventually went away from voice communications to computer networking and changed their name to Teledesic. Everyone seemed to forget about geostationary Ka band computer networking.

    Even so, I still think there is enormous opportunity for a geostationary orbital computation satellite network based on phased-array spot beam switching and intersatellite optical links.

  105. Deorbiting satellites by XNormal · · Score: 2

    The Iridium satellites are orbiting at 780km. This means they will stay up for thousands of years (at least) if they are not deorbited.

    For an interesting discussion of the problem and a novel solution see the Terminator Tether.

    ----

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  106. Differences between Globalstar and Iridium by XNormal · · Score: 2

    Globalstar satellites are much smaller (480kg) and cheaper. They are not switchboards in the sky with satellite cross-links like Iridium. They are just dumb frequency translators ("bent pipe" transceivers).

    All the smarts are on the ground. You can think of them as antennas connected to the cellular base station with a really long cable. As a result, they will not work in places like the middle of the pacific ocean. You must be within about 1000km from a ground station. They will also not work in the polar regions. They orbits are inclined and do not cover the poles since there aren't that many customers there... Compare this with Iridum where the poles get the best coverage since all Iridium orbits intersect over the poles.

    Globalstar uses CDMA. Your handset can communicate with two or more satellites simultaneously and actually sum their signals coherently before decoding (soft handoff). This should result in better coverage.

    Globalstar uses a variation of IS-95 CDMA and probably has the same vocoder - variable rate QCELP at up to 9600 bps. Iridium is not GSM, it uses a low rate vocoder (2400bps).

    Both Iridium and Globalstar have negligible propagation delay because of their low orbits. The vocoders cause most of the delay.
    ----

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
    1. Re:Differences between Globalstar and Iridium by strat · · Score: 1

      I stand partially corrected. Iridium, while not the standard rate GSM vocoder, does have a GSM-derived vocoder. For corroboration, see the article "Out Standing In Its Field (an obituary)" below.

      The path diversity feature seems by far to be the most exciting aspect of G*'s service. They're claiming that we'll be in sight of 2-4 sats at most times. Soft handoff might be the thing that makes discerning customers just use the uplink all of the time, if they're as frustrated with drops as I.

  107. Well Darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I see my phone is displaying the message "URGENT: Iridium service may be unavailable after Mar 17 at 11:59 p.m. EST." plus some contact info. So if you were planning on calling, do it before then.

    After that, maybe I can sell it to the Smithsonian or something. Any ideas?

    At least when Commodore went bankrupt my Amiga didn't stop working.

  108. Re: Space Junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not that i know too much about physics, but i think an international law should be past that every sattelite luanched should have retro rockets. i don't think they need to be very powerful, even a couple of co2 thrusters would start a slow reentry, giving the size of irridiun not much would be left of it.

  109. Need help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where can I warez a copy of redhat?

  110. Mir entertainment center by cyphunk · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the floating sat's will wind up being used to service communcation and entertainment for those visiting the Mir space station.

  111. Iridium's real value - Satellite paging? by jaredreimer · · Score: 1

    As a regular user of Iridium satellite paging, I'm terribly disappointed to hear that they're planning on shutting down. It seems to me that they should have put a little more emphasis on the satellite paging functionality of Iridium, as the pagers are reasonably priced ($295) and the service is, as well ($65). My only real complaint, other than the fact that the pager will be come a paperweight in a few days, has been that the paging coverage suffers somewhat in large buildings and densely populated areas. But the good far outweighed the bad, and I'm really going to miss having a pager that works everywhere, even on airplanes.

    Are there other satellite paging companies out there? (By this, I mean pagers that receive messages directly from satellites, not simple nationwide paging.) I've looked around at the other satellite telephony companies and they all seem to be following Iridium's lead, pushing voice applications much harder than paging.

  112. Sailing, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, damn, I know what *I'm* doin this weekend!

  113. Damn, I remember that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1979? Seems like it was older. Oh well. Brain fade. That and 'Space 1999', kooky stuff for kidz.

  114. Iridium LAUNCHES still scheduled by dmd · · Score: 1

    According to Vandenberg AFB, there are still Iridium launches scheduled. Or is that something else?


    --

  115. Get 'em while they're hot... by Blrfl · · Score: 1
  116. Re:Geostationary, Low Earth Orbit, Computer & Voic by Mega_doof · · Score: 1

    Currently, Lockheed Martin, Telespazio SpA and TRW are combining their resources (financial and technical) to create a system called Astrolink that is a global, GEO-sat ATM-based bandwidth on demand system.

    The original design had phase array antennae and intra-satellite optical links; the current desing has a more conventional antenna design and ground-based intra-satellite links. It uses VSAT type terminals and larger 3 meter dishes for network access.

    The processing on the ground required to control data traffic is quite hefty, but the system is viable and will be online soon (I hope).

    The envisioned use of the system is not for distributed computing but for busines applications such as video conferencing and data exchange.

  117. IRIDIUM FLASH PICTURE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody loves APOD.

  118. WHat does this mean... by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    for the guys working on TeleDisc? TeleDisc is a constellation of LEO satillites that will provide high speed internet acess wherever you are in the world (supposedly). It's supposed to work with low power nodes (mobile stuff) and higher power nodes (homes, businesses). I think it would be rad to have a single high speed internet connection that I could take on the road with me when I was out with my laptop. Now I'm wondering if Iridium's failure is going to scare off other satillite based communication ventures.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  119. Poor Skinnarmo and Kropp by Utter · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, this means bad news for the two swedish adventurers Ola Skinnarmo and Göran Kropp which currently are skiing towards the north pole. No more reports from them then. I hope they have some other ways of communicate with the rest of the world.

  120. What about the Ground Infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once read that one of the things that made Iridium so expensive was all the ground infrastructure for beaming info from the satilites down to earth. There was also some strange stuff about how if you made a call from a certain country that country's telco would get money for the call, even if the only thing that was being used was the electromagnetic radio spectrum for the transmission.
    Anyone know anything about this?
    Heck, I'd rather lay claim to the ground stations and government licenses than the stupid pieces of flying metal.

  121. Ebay Items ... by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
  122. Actually, I am a space lawyer.... by YIAAL · · Score: 1
    There is no salvage for space objects. Ultimately, the launching state is liable (this is complex for Iridium since I believe that some were launched from the US, some from Russia/Kazakhstan). But some batch of taxpayers will foot the bill for any damage done. There has been a push for space salvage law in order to deal with problems like this; perhaps this affair will give it some additional momentum. You can read more about it in my book "Outer Space: Problems of Law and Policy" (HarperCollins Westview, 1997)(be sure you get the paperback, as the hardcover is an outrageous $68). There's also a good website on space law issues at

    http://www.permanent.com/archimedes with HTML versions of many articles.

  123. As if nothing is wrong... by Animats · · Score: 2

    If you go to the Iridium home page, everything is just fine. You can still order an Iridium phone. No indication that the service may go down within a week, except a vague note about the McCaw deal falling through. Are they in denial over there, or what?

  124. Iridium Flares Link by TangoChaz · · Score: 1

    Heavens-Above public agent for German Space Operations Centre

    TangoChaz

    "It's not enough to be on the right track -- you have to be moving faster than the train." -- Rod Davis, Editor of Seahorse Mag.

    --

    TangoChaz

    --------------------
    Wise men talk because they have something to say, fools because the
  125. Hey, delmoi! Read this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Most people probably don't go back through old posts in user info, but sometimes I do so here goes. It's worth a try.

    Offtopic maybe but it isn't really even that. The only moderation this deserves is +1 funny.

    I agree, and I just clobbered the moderator in metamoderation. What a dumbass. I also nailed the moron who moderated its companion as "Flamebait". It's a drop in the bucket, but ya do whatcha can. If they absolutely had to zap those posts, they could have done "Offtopic", for God's sake. There was no flamebait there. None.

    Poetically enough, I'm the troll these guys were responding to when the moderators ambushed 'em :)