Slashdot Mirror


Forget The Pentium, Hack The 68K

Mr. Groove writes: "Hey foo, think your PIII is killer? Imagine running Photoshop on one of these!" Frugal or insane -- only you can decide.

181 comments

  1. 68k is great! by Noofus · · Score: 1

    The 68k is hugely popular as an embedded processor. Hell, my fridge has one. Wow...powers macs ans refridgerators! Nice and versitle.

    1. Re:68k is great! by Stormie · · Score: 3

      68k is great.. but unfortunately this article is a little mislabelled. The site in question is all about hacking Mac Color Classics, which came with a 68030, to use a PowerPC.

      So, sadly, we're not talking about a true believer in the coolness of 68k's.. but rather a true believer in the coolness of a certain size & shape of all-in-one Mac.. oh well..

    2. Re:68k is great! by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      It used to be ('91) that the best use I could find for an Intel PC was a router -- two ether cards a dedicated OS on floppy, no Keyboard or monitor. No needs to deal with M$-DOS and no worry about 64K limits. A '386/66 could handle the load just fine.
      Now it's the old MACs that are being flayed. Such is life.

      Cutest stunt I saw, though, was a friend of mine who had completed the engineering for fitting a MAC OEM board into a 200MZ PPC laptop, using the case as a heatsink. That was just about the time that Apple decided to skewer their OEMs.
      Ditch one laptop (and company!).
      --

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    3. Re:68k is great! by pugugly · · Score: 1
      Wow...powers macs ans refridgerators! Nice and versitle

      Seems only fair, after all the pentiums of the time doubled as stoves . . .

      This has been a test of the Slashdot Broadcast Network . . .

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    4. Re:68k is great! by Oarboat_7 · · Score: 1

      I now feel lucky that my check is in the mail ($25) for another SE/30 that I found on an online classified site recently, because retro-aritcles like this are going to end up making that particular model popular and even more scarce on the used market. The SE/30 is the only 68K-based "Compact Mac" capable of running a modern Freenix (NetBSD-68K in my case).

      I don't have that many MacOS friends, but look forward to the first one who walks up to my SE/30 and notices it's running BSD with X.

  2. Trollers' Paradise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    As I scroll through the stories, see the mods are on meth
    I take a look at my karma, realize there's none left
    'Cause I've been trolling and flaming so long that
    Even Trollmastah thinks that my mind is gone
    But I ain't never crossed a post that didn't deserve it
    Me be modded up at all, you know that's unheard of
    You better watch how Katz's talking, courting the masses
    If I ever meet his homies I'll kick their asses
    I really hate to troll but I gotta say
    VA pays the bills, that means Hemos is gay... fool
    I'm the kinda troll that script kiddies wanna be like
    On Slashdot in the night, trollin' to set this earth right

    They been spending most their lives living in a trollin' paradise
    They been spending most their lives living in a trollin' paradise
    We been spending most our lives living in a trollin' paradise
    We been spending most our lives living in a trollin' paradise

    They got the moderation, they rule the nation
    I can't post a normal post, I tried -- no route to host!
    So I gotta be down with the Slashdoterati
    Too much videotape watching got me chasing Natalie
    I'm an anonymous fool with hot grits on my mind
    Got pancakes in my hand and first posts in my eye
    I'm an open source caveman from k-stuff-inchfan
    And my homies is down so don't even try that ban ... fool
    First ain't nothing but a heart beat away
    I'm owning you left and right, what can I say
    I'm -3; never will I whore to hit 25
    The way we're going just won't survive
    Tell me why are we so blind to see
    That the ones we mod aren't just ACs

    They been spending most their lives living in a trollin' paradise
    They been spending most their lives living in a trollin' paradise
    We been spending most our lives living in a trollin' paradise
    We been spending most our lives living in a trollin' paradise

    Karma and the stories, stories and the karma
    Zealot after zealot, dogma after dogma
    Everybody's posting, but half of them ain't thinking
    What's going on in Andover, something must be stinking
    They say I've got to log in; nobody talks to ACs
    If they can't even read it, how can they raise me
    I guess they can't
    I guess they won't
    I guess they front
    That's why I know my life is out of luck... fool

    Tell me why are we so blind to see
    That the ones we mod aren't just ACs
    Tell me why are we so blind to see
    That the ones we mod aren't just ACs

    1. Re:Trollers' Paradise by nebby · · Score: 1

      Wow I usually don't bother readying long things by trolls but this one is pretty damn funny :) Good job hehe

      My favt is

      They say I've got to log in; nobody talks to ACs
      If they can't even read it, how can they raise me
      I guess they can't
      I guess they won't
      I guess they front
      That's why I know my life is out of luck... fool

      modern day geek.

      --
      --
    2. Re:Trollers' Paradise by zeck · · Score: 3

      Cool song, but I think it says something (bad) about Slashdot and the Slashdot readership that as I write this, the Trollers' Paradise post is the highest scored post on this article. I mean, it's pretty good as trolls go, but still, I'd hope there would be a meaningful, on topic comment somewhere on this thread deserving a better rating.

    3. Re:Trollers' Paradise by Zach978 · · Score: 1

      This was funny, then I read it to the song, and it was really funny! It was very well done and fits the song perfectly!!

      Of course you can go on Napster and find it, Coolio - Gangstas Paradise, of course you would only do this if you own the CD....

      --

      "I told you a million times not to exaggerate!"
    4. Re:Trollers' Paradise by Ravagin · · Score: 1

      I saw this post when this article first came up, and assumed it would be moderated down. But it seems to have been booted up to the highest position. Maybe he's right; maybe the current moderators are on meth...or something...
      Actually, it's not that bad as trolls go. It seems to be vainly struggling to make a point (horror of horrors!). But why post it AC, comrade? Get an account and rake in the karma! ;)
      ===
      -J

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

    5. Re:Trollers' Paradise by mihalis · · Score: 1
      Of course you can go on Napster and find it, Coolio - Gangstas Paradise,

      Of course you all know that Gangsta's Paradise is really just Pastime Paradise by Stevie Wonder with different lyrics, don't you? Please?

      That's why it was so funny when Coolio complained about Weird Al's Amish Paradise...

    6. Re:Trollers' Paradise by zeck · · Score: 1

      You're sort of missing the point here. They upgrade the Color Classics because they like the form factor. The point isn't to make them as fast as a brand new machine, just to allow them to use somewhat modern applications. Upgrading an Apple IIe is cool, but then you're still not using a Color Classic. And there is some hardware hacking involved - did you read the part about adding a capacitor to increase screen width?

      By the way, "$3 crack" doesn't make sense. You can't buy a "crack" (assuming you're referring to cocaine) so you really should specify quantity.

  3. Once more, how about reading the site before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...posting the link? It's not about 68k hacking, it's about using PPC boards in old cases.

  4. This page isn't about 68k @ all by linuxonceleron · · Score: 4

    The webpage referenced descibes modifications to the Mac Color Classic (and Color Classic II which was never released in the US) Almost all of the mods are done by replacing the Classic motherboard with one from an All-In-One mac like the educational models. Since the motherboards are similar enough, they can be hacked to fit into the case of the classic. Also, most people tweak the little 9" trinitron to 640x480 so it can actually be used for real work. Some people even go as far as to replace the 603e in the LC motherboard with a G3 upgrade chip, making one crazy fast classic. To me this seems like crazy stuff, but I'm sure some people enjoyed doing it. Looks like a sweet hack.

    --

    Shine on, you crazy diamond.
    1. Re:This page isn't about 68k @ all by Otter · · Score: 1

      Some people even go as far as to replace the 603e in the LC motherboard with a G3 upgrade chip, making one crazy fast classic.

      Here's a picture.

      My all time favorite Mac hack was the PowerMac in an Apple ][ case -- using the green Apple ][ monitor.

    2. Re:This page isn't about 68k @ all by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

      Where's the URL to the page documenting that hack? I have been looking for it for a while and can't find it. I remember that it was in Japanese, but that's about it. Please mail me the URL if you know it...


      Seth

  5. Intresting.. . by rpsoucy · · Score: 1

    But will it work with the old LC II's >=)

    1. Re:Intresting.. . by Mr.+Piccolo · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... If you can fit it into a Color Classic, you could probably also fit it into an LCII, although heigh (1.5" or so?) could be a problem...

      --
      Glückwünsche, haben Sie Slashdot ermordet, indem Sie zum korporativen Druck beugten und Subskriptionen einlei
  6. Right On! by jonfromspace · · Score: 1

    Wow, now this is cool. (although it is a mac)

    Makes me want to pop some dual PIII's in an old Pet box. :)

    And so what if the title was a little missleading, it is still the coolest MAC I have ever seen.

    --
    I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
    1. Re:Right On! by delmoi · · Score: 1

      Makes me want to pop some dual PIII's in an old Pet box. :)

      Actually, it would be like putting PentiumIIs in a 386 box, witch would not be hard it all, given the modular nature of PCs.... (as opposed to Macs, witch is why this store is anything at all)

      --

      ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  7. What's wrong with 68k? by Grant+Elliott · · Score: 4

    You'd be surprised what can run off a 68k chip. They truly are an example of excellent versatile design. These things have been in common use since the 70's when they ran the first Macs. Since then, they've found their way into everything from robots to calculators. They provide an excellent chip for robotists (hobby and professional) as they are highly versatile and can be programmed using Interactive C (designed to be similar to a language most programmers already know). Check out the Rug Warrior for an example of a robot running off a 68k. Now, they run the TI-89 and TI-92(+) graphing calculators. 68k assembly is remarkably capable. Plus, they can be overclocked from the intended 10 mHz up to a whopping 12 mHz very easily (even farther with a little work). Despite the speed limitations of the chip, a good assembly or C programmer can use one of these things for just about anything.

    Of course, my calculator is more powerful than those Macs...

    --

    "I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." -Richard Feynman

    1. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      You'd be surprised what can run off a 68k chip. They truly are an example of excellent versatile design. These

      YOu'd be surprised how many people don't even bother to read the article, instead jumping in to rack up some karma whore points.

      I don't know where you get your facts, but the 68k never ran macs in the 70s. Try 1983. Try reading the article.

      BTW, x86 assembley is "amazingly versatile". That about like saying "the sun is bright." assembly by defination is versitile.

      Despite the limitations...what the hell? Despite the inherent crappiness of ANY computer system, a good programmer can do just about what he wants.

      Try reading the article first and then posting something that isn't pedantic karma food.

    2. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Palm Pilots.

    3. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 3

      I think that's supposed to be 680x, the 8-bit generation of CPUs which ran stuff from the PET to the Apple, and the C=64. People have told me that the functionality of the chip varied greatly between the versions... but I don't really care.

      I know it best as the 6808 in the Heathkits they used in my highschool digital electronics class.

      I think the coco also ran the thing.

      The first Macs were 68000s or something... and as another poster pointed out.. mid '80s, not late '70s.

    4. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

      Before the l33t Mac and Amiga zealots were around My father had a TRS-80 Model 16 computer from Tandy when I was a kid. The Model 16, released in 1982, was based around a 4-MHz Z80 (which was faster than the Z80-based models I, III, and IV) and a 6-MHz 68000 chip. It was the playstation 2 of its day: more powerful than most any desktop computer (it could even become a XENIX workstation) and fully back-compatible with the Model II. A great but largely unsung machine. 68k forever! :)

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    5. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Don't forget all the old UNIX boxes. HPUX, NeXT, SunOS 3 (is that Solaris -1?), SGI I think too all ran their stuff on the 68k.
      Atari STs (520 and 130) ran them as well. Jack Tramiel, where are you?

    6. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by Rahoule · · Score: 1

      No, the Mac wasn't released until 1984, but the 68000 chip, the first of Motorola's 680x0 series, was released in 1979 (or '78; I'm not 100% sure about that, someone correct me if necessary).

      The chip was pretty expensive at first, so it was mostly used to run mainframes and the like until it became cheaper. (I think.)

      I took a course in 68000 assembler a few years ago and learned a whole lot about its ins and outs. It's a pretty good chip! But why won't it let me perform byte-sized operations on an address register or dereference data registers (to look up values in memory, etc.)? I guess it was Motorola's way of forcing programmers to get a little organized...!

    7. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by kcarnold · · Score: 1
      > Now, they run the TI-89 and TI-92(+) graphing calculators. 68k assembly is remarkably capable.

      So please port Linux to the TI-89/92? This is not the first time I've asked. Thanks very much in advance.

    8. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by M.+Silver · · Score: 1
      PET to the Apple, and the C=64

      Not the C64, as some have mentioned, but the Tandy Color Computer, its (not terribly successful) competitor. Also the Tano Dragon, the UK equivalent (of the Coco, not the Commo).

      MC68A09E, to be precise. I used to read the hex dumps and hand-decode its ROMs. Hoo boy.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    9. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by Ophelan · · Score: 1
      Uh....PalmPilots run on the dragonball processor, not a 680x0 series. Perhaps you are thinking of the TI-89 and TI-92 calculators?

      Daniel

      ---

    10. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by warrior · · Score: 1

      Hasn't sgi always been MIPS?

      --
      Intel transfer the difficult from Hadware to software, for get more power, programmer need more technology. -- chinaitn
    11. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by chown · · Score: 1

      Uh....PalmPilots run on the dragonball processor, not a 680x0 series. Perhaps you are thinking of the TI-89 and TI-92 calculators?

      Palm Pilots (I know this for a fact about the IIIx's, I don't know about the others, I'd assume they're similar though) emulate a straight M68k. There's an assembly language course at stanford taught in m68k assembler using palm pilots as the target platform.

      And m68k assembler just kicks the crud out of x86... have you ever looked at that stuff? I mean assembler aside, I'm surprised intel can get their chips to power up, let alone run at the speeds they seem to make them run at. x86 assembler is sorta fubar'd, goes well with windows.

    12. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by PotatoHead · · Score: 2

      You know the early motorola designs were pretty powerful. The 68k's older cousin was the 6809 and its more powerful version 6809e were probably the best of the 8bit chips around. I learned assembly on these things, and they were great. OS/9 was ported to the ColorComputer. We had multiuser-multitasking on a machine with just 128Mbytes of ram. Very stable, very capable. If you look at the early Intel designs from the same period from that perspective it makes for a good joke.

    13. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by loki7 · · Score: 3
      Uh...The Dragonball is a 680x0 series. 68328 to be exact. These have got other neat stuff in them like RS-242, IRDA, PCMCIA(?) and video, but the core is a 68000.

      /peter

    14. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by HypodermicEyes · · Score: 1

      nuh unh... their IRIS 1000/2000/3000 series' use 680x0. I believe it was only around 1986 that the move towards MIPS began. The 3000 series finally ended production in 1989.

    15. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by Bishop · · Score: 2

      The orignal Indigo used a 68030 I believe

    16. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by mwkohout · · Score: 1

      ah, no. it used an R3000--if you mean the SGI Indigo....

    17. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by stokessd · · Score: 1

      The Palms are rumoured to switch to an ARM or Strong/ARM processor in the future.

      Sheldon

    18. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by Antti · · Score: 1

      The first Commodores and apples used the 6502 from Mostek. The C-64 used an enhanced 6502 called the 6510. The coco was based on the Motorola 6809. The Mac started using the 68000 series.
      >I think the coco also ran the thing.
      >The first Macs were 68000s or something... and as another poster pointed out.. mid '80s, not late '70s.

    19. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by Rahoule · · Score: 1

      Huh? You can perform byte-sized operations on a 68K address register. It's only when you try to read/write a word or longword with an address which is not word- or longword-aligned (respectively) that you get in trouble.

      Yeah, I remember that. "Bus error" is what the 68000 gives you if you try that. My 68000 assembly language teacher was a bit of a joker and said that a "bus error" is what you get when the bus takes a wrong turn and strays from its route!

      I was referring to doing something like this:

      move.b $2376,a0
      add.b #$40,a2

      I don't think that's legal on the 68000, or any 680x0 processor if I recall correctly. You can transfer bytes in and out of data registers easily, of course.

      It's not like I'd have any practical need for it... It just would be cool to be able to do it!

      P.S. Starting with (I believe) the 68020, you could read and write misaligned words and longwords without getting a bus error. Also, I'm not sure, but I think the 68000 could read a longword that was word-aligned but not longword-aligned.

    20. Re:What's wrong with 68k? by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

      Yup! Guess it is pretty easy these days to make that mistake... Been a while since 128K was and address space huh?

  8. Re:Those machines all share one big disadvantage by tzach · · Score: 1

    Pretty leaky for a closed mind.

  9. That's nothing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm working on installing a Pentium chip inside of my Furby with a fan and all. I'm just having trouble deciding through which hole the air flow will come out.

  10. oh no! by soulsteal · · Score: 4
    [sung to the tune of "georgie girl]

    hey there, power mac,
    swinging round the mouse so fancy free
    nobody you meet could ever see the source code in there...
    inside you

    hey there, power mac,
    why do most fanatics pass you by?
    could it be you just don't try?
    or is it the case you wear?

    you're always window shopping
    but never trying to change
    this won't get newer people in range.....
    as customers..

    hey there, power mac,
    there's another OS deep inside
    BSD is really neat but darwin it came to be...
    the world will see....

    a new power mac!

    [Fade music out]

  11. Um, is this safe? by Yu+Suzuki · · Score: 2
    I really admire the ingenuity of the people who come up with these hacks, but is it really safe to be stuffing other boards into a Mac Colour (or Color, if you Americans prefer) Classic? Let's face, old cases weren't designed with the perfomance of today's chips in mind. Today's chips, of course, run much faster, and generate a lot more heat. That's fine, because today's mini-towers are equipped with appropriate fans, but what if the chips are being placed in antiquated cases? Remember when the Pentium first came out -- there was a huge to-do about the chips frying in older computer cases.

    So why should we care? As was pointed out in the Slashdot story itself, this seems economical -- why buy a whole new computer when you can just stick some new chips in your old Colour (Color, whatever) Classic? I could easily see some clueless MCSE guy deciding to put "mission critical" data on a hacked Colour (Color) Classic Mac that's liable to burn out at any second -- and I don't know about you, but I'd prefer not to have our airplanes and nuclear missiles being run on overclocked 1990s Macintoshes. Ugh.

    Hacks are neat and all, but the danger of "burning out" the chips simply outweighs the cost -- in the long run, the Opportunity Cost of using standardized chips is much less.

    Yu Suzuki

    --

    Yu Suzuki
    Deamcast. It's thinking.

    1. Re:Um, is this safe? by Cattywampus · · Score: 2

      Either you're trolling and I'm missing it, or you really aren't Getting It.

      These folks aren't doing it for safety. They're doing it for the sheer thrill of doing it (and it _is_ a fairly wicked hardware hack).

      It's not meant to be economical, either. Including time spent to perpetrate the hack, you could probably score more power from an older-model iMac for less money.

      It ain't gonna end up in businesses, either, 'cause businesses don't work like that.

      Also, you don't know your chips so well; the PowerPC chips run way cooler than any Pentium. Which isn't to say that they're exactly minifridges, but cooling is less of a problem. If the chip does get too toasty, it won't do it for a while to come; and when it does fry, then they'll probably just refine the hack a bit more.

      - C. Here, have a Clue. No extra charge. *grin*

    2. Re:Um, is this safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most of the chips they are putting in these color classics arn't that hot,PPC 603e and G3. If they were 604e's or G4's that might be diffrent. The thing that is underpowered and ready to burn out in a second, in a color classic is the power supply. I have a color classic and the only hack I've done to it so far is the blue led. I run it as a kitchen appliance with 1600 recipies on it, though I would love to do the CD.

    3. Re:Um, is this safe? by Ravagin · · Score: 1

      Don't be so pessimistic. Look at it as natural selection.

      (Just kidding! I have nothing against this sort of thing. It's quite fun.)
      ===
      -J

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

    4. Re:Um, is this safe? by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Try following the link and actually reading the article... You can't just change 'a few chips' and go from 68k to PPC. This 'hack' centers around basically recycling the case/monitor from an all-in-one mac. Not really much of the original hardware left.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  12. That'll teach me not to stereotype! by Otter · · Score: 3

    I have to admit, I would never have imagined that the person who hacked a Color Classic monitor to run at 640x480 would be a woman! That'll teach me to Think Different!

  13. Breath of fresh air by Witchblade · · Score: 4
    With the deluge of political battles, legal battles, market wars, and marketing bullshit we're bombarded with these days it was so refreshing to read something that makes you say, "Damn, it feels good to be a hacker!"

    Thanks, Slashdot, this story made my day. :)

  14. first Macs in the seventies? by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


    Try something like 1983-84.



    Seth
  15. Sigh. Why mod this down? by Medieval · · Score: 3
    While this post is offtopic, this post and others like it define a part of Slashdot that hopefully won't die.

    I'm not talking about ten page pastes of the same thing over and over or one word attempts at getting a first post. I'm talking about the intelligent trolls. Anyone who reads the above post without cracking a smile - nay, anyone who reads any such post without cracking a smile - has obviously missed the boat.

    Trolling on Slashdot has become its own subculture, much like B1FF on Bitnet. OOG, the Don Knotts guy, they are all a part of Slashdot culture.

    Trolling has taken a new meaning with Slashdot. Trolling is not necessarily flamebait. Admit it, you've been had by the Don Knotts guy *at least* once, and you felt pretty silly. It was harmless enough, and nobody but you knows you've been had, but thats part of the charm. The OOG posts and poem or song lyric posts, arguably, require intelligence and a certain amount of cleverness to produce.

    Most trolls on Slashdot are like graffiti artists; if you let them grow a little bit, they can paint murals that you're somewhat ashamed to envy, like the above spoof of "Gangsta's Paradise."

    1. Re:Sigh. Why mod this down? by G27+Radio · · Score: 2

      I'm with you on that, but he (as well as you and I) deserve a markdown for being OT. As far as marking it up as funny, don't be ashamed.

      numb

    2. Re:Sigh. Why mod this down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a time and a place for everything. Funny article, but why couldn't this AC wait for a slashdot/moderation article?

      I modded his post (and yours) down.

      Posted via AC because:
      1. Crappy moderation rules
      2. Not intended for archive

    3. Re:Sigh. Why mod this down? by LS · · Score: 1

      The above message is really just a well crafted troll made to look like a message.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    4. Re:Sigh. Why mod this down? by LS · · Score: 1

      The post was refering to a troll, but I was calling it a troll itself... Thus making it a troll about a troll. Hence the recursive nature of my statement. nevermind

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    5. Re:Sigh. Why mod this down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't give them any ideas. They might start meta-trolling.

  16. interesting. by mcc · · Score: 2

    although not as cool of the story i once heard of the guy in germany who took a Power Mac and an Apple //gs, removed all the pieces from both, and put all the Power Mac pieces into the //gs.. leaving a power mac in a //gs case :)

    i still wonder if that was real. supposedly there are pictures floating around somewhere.

    1. Re:interesting. by LafinJack · · Score: 1

      I saw this a while back also. He took a Power Mac 9600 (one of the best computers ever made IMNSHO :) and put it into the case of the //gs. He even went so far as to put the newer mouse mechanism into the old mouse housing. WAY too much free time there... :)

      The one and (thankfully) only,

      LafinJack

      --
      we are building a religion
      a limited edition
      we are now accepting callers
      for these pendant key chains
  17. They look kinda shitty. :( by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2
    The screen -- gah! How could you use a monitor that small? Doesn't matter how fast it goes, it'd be like watching your desktop through backwards binoculars...

    Maybe I'm just spoiled by my 21" Sony, but I can fit almost 9 of those 640x480 desktops on my screen at once...

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:They look kinda shitty. :( by scm · · Score: 1

      Not all machines are used from their console. You could use something like this to serve web/file/dns... Maybe a network MP3 Audio Appliance :-)

    2. Re:They look kinda shitty. :( by Tower · · Score: 1

      yup, I know somebody who was using an old SE30 (4MB)with OpenBSD as a webserver. Just a toy, but pretty neat.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    3. Re:They look kinda shitty. :( by chrischow · · Score: 1
      Maybe I'm just spoiled by my 21" Sony, but I can fit almost 9 of those 640x480 desktops on my screen at once...

      i don't like using big monitors more than say 17" and 800x600 resolution, everything is a taf too small for mine eyes and u have to reach further for everything w/ thou mouse

    4. Re:They look kinda shitty. :( by jvj24601 · · Score: 1
      I have an old SE/30 that I used to use as a doorstop. I've been trying to figure out what to do with this sucker (short of making an aquarium). I can't find an MP3 player that runs on the old 68030, so maybe I'll turn it into a web server!

      Thanks for the idea.

    5. Re:They look kinda shitty. :( by Oarboat_7 · · Score: 1

      Install NetBSD or OpenBSD on your SE/30.

    6. Re:They look kinda shitty. :( by Zeus305 · · Score: 1

      Then use the same resolution or only slightly larger on a bigger moniter and the images will actually be bigger and easier to see.

      --

      Black holes are where god divided by zero

  18. Yup...holy shit.. by fluxrad · · Score: 5

    I'm not sure this is exactly newsworthy. I mean...it's just a guy who basically gutted an old mac and put new shit in it. What other articles are we going to see??

    Learn how to make your own 500hp Ugo
    John Holmes writes: it's the craziest thing...you have to have m4d sk33lz to figure this out. Basically, we put an engine from a Z28 into an old ass Ugo, we put new headers and an exhaust kit on it, as well as a K&R filter and new plugs and wires. A subframe connecter, and a new racing tranny. But the badges are still the same.

    Oops - that's going to be posted on /. tomorrow. oh well - you heard it first.


    FluX
    After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
    1. Re:Yup...holy shit.. by linuxonceleron · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I gutted an old SGI Indigo with the intent to fit it with PC parts, but I never got around to it, but if several hours of work will get me some fame on slashdot, wow I should actually get around to going that, right now its doing nothing but making a nice spot for my cat. For all those SGI lovers out there (are there any?) the machine was dead when I got it, I wouldn't gut a perfectly good SGI to put a PC in it.

      --

      Shine on, you crazy diamond.
    2. Re:Yup...holy shit.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4

      I HACKED A PICKLE JAR TO STORE APPLESAUCE!

    3. Re:Yup...holy shit.. by fluxrad · · Score: 1

      oops - make that a K&M filter. sorry - been fucking with C too much. :P (obscure reference)


      FluX
      After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

      --
      "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
    4. Re:Yup...holy shit.. by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      I think it would be really 3l33t to put together a bunch of G4/450 Apple ][ hacks and turn them into a beowulf cluster. You could then use your m4d sk33lZ to mount the cluster in your 500hp Ugo for a m4d kewl mp3 player.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  19. Put the crack pipe down and back away slowly... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    This is just a bunch of people doing it for fun. Who the hell is talking about running planes and missiles off of Macs in old case...or any Mac at all??

    I like it. It's fun. It's like swapping a VR6 into a first gen. Rabbit and spanking all those turbo civics.

    --
    Blar.
  20. Correction by Grant+Elliott · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry. The first Macintosh was released on October 5, 1984. It used a 68k chip clocked at 8 mHz.

    --

    "I believe that a scientist looking at nonscientific problems is just as dumb as the next guy." -Richard Feynman

    1. Re:Correction by pc486 · · Score: 1

      But I thought that it was made before that date and it even had plans. Of course this was Yet Another Simple Computer built by some collage person that happens to be richer than many people right now.

    2. Re:Correction by Darchmare · · Score: 2

      Erm, the first Mac (the 128k) was released Jan. 24th, 1984.

      Its precursor, the Lisa, I believe was introduced the year earlier to little fanfair.

      - Jeff A. Campbell
      - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

      --

      - Jeff
  21. Hahaha. Cool. by Cattywampus · · Score: 1

    Alright. I'm one of those tight-assed people that usually doesn't think much at all of the trolling going on.

    But this one made me grin like hell.

    Weird, tho, it's actually got a few _points_; intelligent trolls, who'd've thunk it?

    - C. "Everybody's posting, but half of them ain't thinking". Hehe.

  22. cat tpe o it by geekpress · · Score: 1
    My mother, up until this winter, endured one of the earliest PowerPCs. It was something like 66mHz. It was so slow that you had to type at about 20 words a minute, lest it skip about every other letter. I never knew how hard it was to slow down my typing (normally about 80 wpm)!

    But not to worry, I gave her an 4 year old Mac Clone of my husband's to update it. Now she's zipping along at 150 mHz! :-)

    I still have a working Mac Classic, just B&W, as color wasn't available when my parents bought it. It has 80 MB of disk space and 4 MB of RAM, if I recall correctly. I can't manage to throw it away though. I'm still hoping to get some use out of it. :-)

    (My sister, on the other hand, still uses the first family computer, a Mac SE, to do her finances in Quicken.)

    -- Diana Hsieh

    --

    -- Diana Hsieh
    GeekPress: The Weirder Side of Tech News

    1. Re:cat tpe o it by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Have to agree here. When I saw the first PPCs I thought it was a step backwards. My 25MHz '040 ran faster than they did. It gave me a really bad impression of System 7.5 anyway. (I heard those old machines would run faster with an upgrade to OS 8.) Those PPC 601's would probably make pretty decent Linux boxen though.

      Anyway, that Centris is still in service. My sister is using it. (Though she did ask me last week if she could 'upgrade' it to Windows 98. *sigh*)

    2. Re:cat tpe o it by Kyrrin · · Score: 1

      > My mother, up until this winter, endured one of the earliest PowerPCs. It was something like 66mHz. It was so slow
      > that you had to type at about 20 words a minute, lest it skip about every other letter. I never knew how hard
      > it was to slow down my typing (normally about 80 wpm)!

      Up until last month, *I* was running on a Performa 6115, and up until last week (when she inherited the 6115) my roommate was running on a 6112. Both of them continue to be fully functional (with the exception of the fact that they both have slowly dying motherboard batteries) and didn't have the letter-skipping problem.

      The key? RAM. The 6112 had 72MB and the 6115 had something insane like 128MB. The only reason I finally scraped together the cash to buy a G4 (mmm ... G4 ....) was that I got tired of dealing with the limited disk space, and quite frankly, it was just more cost-effective to get the desktop supercomputer. ^_^

      (oh, who am I kidding, I just wanted the toy...)

  23. now if only... by cronio · · Score: 1

    ...I could change a G3 into a Color Classic! Now THAT would be useful!



    One Microsoft Way

    --


    My plan is to pimp before they realize I'm a jackass. Hit 'em hard and fast.
  24. 680x0 as workhorse. by RennieScum · · Score: 4

    For years I had a Quadra 700, which I did tons of graphic design work on. People would ask how fast it was, and were amazed when I told them 25mHz. It was completely stable, and you could work ahead of the processor, as in punch in several keystrokes (Cut, New, Enter, Paste, F11) and it would do all of them, something Windoze won't do. (Does GIMP do this, anyone?)

    Granted, it sucked at web browsing, but it produced many beautiful images for years.

    Its death came (at 21,000 hours total runtime) because a mouse (the furry, wall-chewing kind) moved into the case, leaving droppings on the motherboard. I've since moved on to multitasking systems with more than one mouse button, but I wish I would have had the foresight to duct tape shut the PCI slot that was open.

    --
    ...Time is the best teacher, unfortunately it kills all of its students.
    1. Re:680x0 as workhorse. by Microlith · · Score: 1

      The reason you could work ahead on the mac was because it was a single tasking OS. Everything you did fell on a stack waiting for it's chance to be input. Win3.1 would do the same thing.


    2. Re:680x0 as workhorse. by bmasel · · Score: 1

      This is coming to you via a Centris 650, albeit with RAM maxed out. Survived a fire in '95 from atop a metal desk. Caused the monitor to explode and made a puddle of the modem. Never did get the CDROM drive to work again.

      I'm figuring run time to date at 30,000 hours.

      When Chicago pays up on my 1996 False Arrest case, I'll drop the $ for a G4.

      What does this do to my Slashdot Purity Index?

      --
      Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
    3. Re:680x0 as workhorse. by delmoi · · Score: 2

      and you could work ahead of the processor, as in punch in several keystrokes (Cut, New, Enter, Paste, F11) and it would do all of them, something Windoze won't do.

      Windows can do this.

      --

      ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  25. Then this, too, must be said... by Millennium · · Score: 1

    Why, why, and why?

    If your religion is any product line, even an Open-Source one, you really have some things to think about.

  26. 68k . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    . .should be enough for everyone.
    What? it's a chip?

  27. 200MHz Apple //e by Noer · · Score: 3

    Does anyone else remember this one? Someone frankensteined an ancient Apple //e into accepting a Powermac 9500 motherboard with a ~200MHz 604e (this was a couple years ago, I think). They actually did a really nice job - the reset key on the //e's keyboard mapped to the power key on the Mac, and a bunch of other things were rather elegantly handled.

    --
    -- "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." -Joseph Stalin
    1. Re:200MHz Apple //e by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Awww, pull the other one!

      Do you have a link for this? If it's true, I'd love to see it.

  28. Geez, does this mean I should get rid of my Athlon by Fervent · · Score: 2
    A gutted Mac with an older G3 chip. My current Athlon with 256 megs of RAM. Let me think about that one for a minute...

    Food for thought: The original TI/99-4A could be expanded to 256K of RAM with a box the size of a small bookcase. Today's inch-high laptops can store 256 megs of RAM. That's an increase of 1000-fold. Pretty amazing stuff.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

  29. Re:Geez, does this mean I should get rid of my Ath by British · · Score: 1

    Food for thought: The original TI/99-4A could be expanded to 256K of RAM with a box the size of a small bookcase. Today's inch-high laptops can store 256 megs of RAM. That's an increase of 1000-fold. Pretty amazing stuff.

    Ahh the good 'ol TI-994/A. The secret to expanding it was to buy the ungodly expensive and heavy PEB(perihperal expansion box). most people didn't.

    I wish I could get one now. I'd gut that baby out and make it a retro '80s case! Either that or a case made to look like a Pac Man arcade cabinet.

  30. The point is to run Darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1


    You see, if you have one of these old Color Macs, you will want to upgrade them to a PPC in order to run Darwin on it. When you think about, there's not much point in keeping an old machine around. It just takes up space. Honestly, what are you going to run on MacOS anyway? MacPaint?

    With this incredible modification, you'll be able to run an Open Source Operating System on your previously-68k Mac. The Motorolla chips are notoriously difficult to program for, which hindered the development of Open Source Software on that chip, and is also why MacOS, which runs so well under the PowerPC, is so slow and powerless on the 68k. So with your new chip, you'll be able to run the Open Source OS of choice for Macs: Apple's Darwin. Because it comes from Apple, and you have official Apple hardware, you can always count on getting good support.

    Myself, I'll just be excited if I can port Quake, and watch it run on my 9 inch screen :)

  31. Commodores ran MOS 650x's by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1
    The C64, Apple II (but not the IIgs), Atari 8bit series, and TI/84a (sp?) ran MOS 650x series processors. Basically reworked versions of the Motorola 6800 series, and most of the basic design was by poached motorola engineers if I recall.

    The C64 had a 6510, basically the diff was talking to all the support chips. Atari and Apple had base 6502's.

    1. Re:Commodores ran MOS 650x's by Chromium_One · · Score: 1

      I know the 6510's added a few more opcodes, never did find a listing of them... always bugged me the info didn't seem to be avialable anywhere.

      --
      When you live in a sick society, just about everything you do is wrong.
    2. Re:Commodores ran MOS 650x's by compwizrd · · Score: 1

      if you're referring to the ti99/4a, no, that had a TS9000 or TS9900, can't remember.. not Motorola either way. been 15 years since i looked at the manual for mine.

    3. Re:Commodores ran MOS 650x's by Detritus · · Score: 2
      Texas Instruments TMS9900

      It was an interesting architecture. It had plenty of general purpose registers but they were stored off-chip in RAM. The CPU had a Workspace Pointer register that contained the base address of the general purpose registers. This allowed the programmer to switch register sets by reloading the Workspace Pointer register.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  32. sorry in advance... by option8 · · Score: 5

    man, is this old news (look at the dates on the site). but, if you're still interested in 68k, apple hardware, or if you're looking for cool cases and some other really interesting hardware hacks - including links to the power colo(u)r classic among others - take a gander at AppleFritter.com - a site dedicated to apple hacks, prototypes and rarities.

    and as for all the rest of you, why do so many of you spell "Mac" "MAC"? what do you think it stands for? Mac is short for Macintosh. not McIntosh or even MacIntosh, and certainly isn't an acronym. those of you in the northern US, where an A.T.M. is sometimes called a M.A.C. i can understand, but these are not cash machines!

    1. Re:sorry in advance... by mat+catastrophe · · Score: 1
      Mac is short for Macintosh. not McIntosh or even MacIntosh, and certainly isn't an acronym. those of you in the northern US, where an A.T.M. is sometimes called a M.A.C. i can understand, but these are not cash machines!
      depends on how you use it!!!
      --
      sig not found
  33. Re:What's wrong with you? by Paradigm+Lost · · Score: 1

    AMIGAS!!!11!!! YAY!!!

    Now, someone tell me how to do this to my Amiga 500!

    (I am only as Red as my beard)

    --
    -Dead Lesbian Witches! Think about it!
  34. Unexplainable Truths... by Darlok · · Score: 3
    Okay, what IS it about folks taking an old junk computer, spending more money on parts than they would on a NEW computer, cramming the stuff into the old case and making the news?!? When's the last time you heard of someone gutting a transistor radio so they could fill it with the innards of a new Denon 5.1 system? Or perhaps disassembling grandma's old Underwood typewriter and jiggering an IBM Electromatic into the shell?

    Not often...

    Why? Because it's cooler to keep them around! How many of you have old Commodore 64's or ColecoVisions that still work? Would you gut it to get a Pentium III crammed in there? Heck no! It's more froody to show it off in working condition during dinner parties...

    ... or at least do something even more sheik and turn it into a fishtank, or perhaps rig that floppy drive that made the "ZZZzzzzzz-cla-click!" noise to dispense Post-It notes.

    My point is, the whole reason this is cool and noteworthy is that the old Mac-in-the-boxes were classics. You could turn it into a two-bottle beer cooler using some copper tubing and an air conditioner pump and people would still stand up and take notice because it's nostalgic.

    So, let's all Here-Here! for the Mac-in-the-boxes. But, can we perhaps stop throwing a party everytime someone jams something inside that doesn't belong there?

    --
    Notice: Your mouse has been moved. Windows will now restart so this change can take effect.
    1. Re:Unexplainable Truths... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 1
      Yes! Yes!

      I'm going to gut my new Mustang Cobra and stuff all the parts into the shell of an old Pinto because of the nostalga value!

      Little kids and mid-life yuppies will all swoon at this frankenbox I have created! And just think the look on their faces when this ~$60k machine cum ~$500.00 fishtank gets rear-ended!

      How the skies will glow! Aaaaa...

      Puuuhlease! I shoved 68040 25's into Amiga 1000's and 2500's too. They were cooler factory spec. Other than that, drill 5/8" holes in the case. That'll help them sink faster and be better boat anchors.

      Moderate me down because my opinion differs from the norm.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Unexplainable Truths... by Oarboat_7 · · Score: 1

      Well, I feel that the hardware should be "preserved" if you have a historic machine, but I think the software is another matter.

      I'm now the proud owner of an SE/30 running NetBSD. It's an appallingly slow machine to run X on, but I still do it. I bought the machine several weeks ago for $10, upgraded it to the max (put 32 Megs of RAM and a 1 gig hard drive in it) and installed NetBSD-68K. I like to think that what I did was the junior (definitely not as cool) version of what the people running NetBSD on VAX hardware are doing.

      It's cool. It probably won't ever be my primary machine (although I installed Lynx on it this morning and intend to connect it to the net (PPP) for some of my online time in the future). But it's already proven to be a useful machine, in that it's dragged me down into the innards of X configuration (spent quite some time learning all about xmodmap just to get the frickin' thing to backspace in an Xterm!)

      I'm glad I bought it. (even though one of the first times I had it open I busted the seal CRT and had to go out and find another one to replace it with)

      No, I probably won't run KDE on it. It would be amusing to look at the KDE desktop on it, but... ummm.... it has a 512x348 screen....

  35. 68K > 10MHz, more like 25 or 33! by Gandalf_007 · · Score: 1
    The Motorola 68040 in my NeXT cube (which is the best hardware I've ever owned!) runs at 25MHz. NeXT later relased a 33MHz "turbo" version, and I think there was a "nitro" version in the labs that ran at 50 or 60MHz. Keep in mind the average PC at the time of the NeXT was a 286, or if you're lucky, maybe a 386/25...if only I could run Linux on it!

    --

    "It's better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
  36. Correction by Microlith · · Score: 2

    Doh... thought I had it nailed down.

    Like win16it was multitasking. Almost.

    The mac os back then was like win16 in that it didn't split the CPU time up fairly among apps. The app that used it all got it all.

    The os had to wait for the cpu to catch up with the app so the app would relinquish control to the OS, which would then apply any mouse clicks or keypresses you did while it was busy.

    New Macs and Win32 machines can do that, but only if a) the app is lagged, and b) you're really careful, since it's a lot eaiser to jump out to other apps.

  37. Apple Hardware pretty cool? by dbm00 · · Score: 5

    One thing that really impressed me about the original Macintosh machinese was that the Apple engineers were really creative about how they built the hardware-- not just what the box itself looked like.

    For example, I was really impressed when I learned that the Macintosh SE/30 included custom ICs to accelerate the normal windowing GUI operations. This was YEARS before the PC saw any kind of real 2D acceleration... and it was a great idea. Anybody who ever played with an SE/30 and a PC of the same era would see the awesome performance advantage the SE/30 had.

    That being said, I was reading through some of "Inside Macintosh" books circa the SE/30 and these guys looked like they were BEASTS to program-- people really had to write assembly language GUI programs? I guess I'm a spoiled product of the OOPY late 90s, but that seems like a deathwish if ever I heard one.

    Another interesting tidbit-- the Apple Macintosh OS is more INfamouse than famous, we all know, but those from around the San Jose area will appreciate the code name Apple engineers had for the OS: Winchester Mystery OS -- signal traps and jumps to null addresses etc... I laughed hard at that one...

    1. Re:Apple Hardware pretty cool? by Tycho · · Score: 1

      The there are many old Macs that are great well designed machines and others that are so poorly designed that they are almost total crap. One that is really bad that comes to mind is the PB 5300. Of course there are some that aren't as well known, but are just as bad. Like the PowerMac 5200 series.
      Go here if you want to read about some really bad old Macs:
      http://www.lowendmac.net/roadapples/index.shtml

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    2. Re:Apple Hardware pretty cool? by Frymaster · · Score: 1

      Assembly GUI? I must admit I didn't crack open a copy of Inside Macintosh until 92 or 93, but pretty much the whole series is dedicated to the toolbox calls to build the gui, run the event loop, file i/o yatta yatta.... (and all the examples were in Pascal!) Furthermore, developing gui widgets was/is still mostly a matter of resource fork editing (with resedit, rez etc.) and while the naming an numbering conventions for resources was a bit byzantine it was almost RAD-like back then with actual point-n-click designing of windows... a big time saver. My biggest complaint was the event handling... when you get up to 900 lines for your even loop, you start to suspect something could be done better...

    3. Re:Apple Hardware pretty cool? by Darchmare · · Score: 2

      I have personally services the infamous 'Hindenbook' a number of times. While I've never seen one spontaneously combust, it was rare that I'd find one whose hinging wasn't cracked up with parts hanging out.

      They made an awful 'crreeaaaak!!' sound whenever you'd open one. Not one of Apple's best machines.

      The 3400, released later, was pretty nice though - as have been all Powerbooks since ('cept the iBook, which is okay for what it is, but I don't really want one).



      - Jeff A. Campbell
      - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

      --

      - Jeff
    4. Re:Apple Hardware pretty cool? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Do you know of some legitimate technical problems with the iBooks? Everyone I've heard thinks they are really great machines. I've thought about getting one simply because I can't afford a PowerBook.

      OTOH if you just don't like the rounded shape and color scheme, oh well...

    5. Re:Apple Hardware pretty cool? by Darchmare · · Score: 2

      Legitimate technical problems? Not really - although I don't do tech support anymore (I've moved to development - yay!). Supposedly they're fairly solid.

      However, they're a little anemic for my tastes. If you don't mind sacrificing the ability to run an external monitor off of it and don't care about the lower-res screen, then it's not so bad.

      Of course, there's the color issue. If you don't like the color scheme, you won't like it. The new graphite models look okay though.

      Plus, you also have form-factor. They are BIG. I don't mind that really (I am a happy user of a PB G3 Bronze, which is pretty large), but some do.

      I'd personally go for a used Powerbook G3, but your mileage may vary.

      - Jeff A. Campbell
      - VelociNews (http://www.velocinews.com)

      --

      - Jeff
  38. A hack I'd really like to see... by cperciva · · Score: 1

    Upgrade a butterfly.
    The IBM Thinkpad 701 (/701C), codenamed "butterfly" was an amazing laptop -- very light and compact, it nevertheless had a full-sized keyboard which "unfolded" when you opened the butterfly's lid.
    The only problem is that the butterfly is a little slow, doesn't have much RAM or disk space, has a battery which lasts only a couple hours, and lacks any communications beyond a 14.4Kbps modem. (It was fine back when we were all using 486s, but times have changed.)
    If someone could work out how to upgrade the butterfly to be on par with modern laptops -- essentially completely rebuilding it apart from the keyboard and display -- that would be a truely great hack.

    1. Re:A hack I'd really like to see... by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see someone upgrade the Compaq Concerto. I've held two in my life - one I upgraded to Win95 (inc the discontinued Pen for Windows) back in 96, the other was a recent virus clense (last year). Great hardware - shame the hinges were broke on both in the same place...

  39. Macintosh Classic (Color) Hacks by norculf · · Score: 2

    I think the Macquarium hack was much cooler. It upgrades a Mac's resolution from b&w to real life. And it runs at the speed of a real aquarium too. If one could figure out how to harness the processing power of a goldfish...


    1. Re:Macintosh Classic (Color) Hacks by Ravagin · · Score: 1

      It upgrades a Mac's resolution from b&w to real life. And it runs at the speed of a real aquarium too.

      Now all it lacks is flying toasters, eh?
      ===
      -J

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

  40. Don't throw that 6100 out! by Ophelan · · Score: 1
    66 MHz? Not quite the oldest; I've got a 60MHz 6100 sitting right next to me, piping along quite well. Granted, the CD-ROM drive is broken and it has an external 1-gig hard drive hanging off it (which I ought to move inside since the CD-ROM is of no use...), but it runs MkLinux quite well and serves as a nice dumb terminal on my desk, freeing up my 19" workstation for other tasks.

    Daniel

    ---

    1. Re:Don't throw that 6100 out! by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      They certainly aren't useless! At the school I go to, we use an old 6100/60 MHz as our webcam! :) See it here.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:Don't throw that 6100 out! by tomierna · · Score: 1

      6100's are still useful.

      Mine serves as a fine MP3 player.

      In my car.

    3. Re:Don't throw that 6100 out! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      My college is still using 6100's in most of the labs as well as machines for faculty (we also have IIvx's in use). I've added G3 upgrades to the 6100's as money permits. I also pick up 6100's for around $200 for G3 upgrades. What can I say we're a poor college.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  41. Why not others... by ClickWir · · Score: 2
    If things like this can be done with an old Apple case, just imagine the kinds of computers that you might be able to stash inside a TRS-80 or a Commodore 64.

    Might even be more secure incase someone breaks into your house. They'll see the old case and thing that it's a piece of crap and take something else. When in fact you have a state of the art pc inside a case from 10years ago.

    I guess the saying "It's not on the outside that counts, it's on the inside." really has a point here.

    1. Re:Why not others... by alecto · · Score: 1

      Or they'll think "These are collectible now!" then take it, and hawk it on eBay with an ad that says "!!! ULTRA R@RE TRS-80, NR, Visa/MC" :>.

  42. Re:68K > 10MHz, more like 25 or 33! by BJH · · Score: 1


    Try NetBSD.

  43. Hilarious by prodeje · · Score: 1

    ..but I still think that "Trollers Wheel" was funnier. Man, this troll is hilarious.

    --

    Bitchslapped? Give Rob a bitchslap from bitchslapped.com.

    1. Re:Hilarious by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      Where was that? I never saw the Trollers Wheel. Can you give a link? Thanks.

      The bus came by and I got on
      That's when it all began
      There was cowboy Neal
      At the wheel
      Of a bus to never-ever land

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
  44. Re:68K > 10MHz, more like 25 or 33! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Nitro used a Turbo motherboard and a daughter card which allowed the CPU (and some on-board cache?) to run at 40MHz.

    Randy Rencsok's site at www.channelu.com or thereabouts should have more detailed information, or look for one of Mike Paquette's posts on comp.sys.next.hardware.

    William

  45. Hum... by Cosworth · · Score: 1

    Maybe my life is just to exciting, but I've bored enough to spend to time and money on something that I would want to use in the first place. 9" monitor? Now PIII or Athlon in an IBM Z50... At least they can with a 14" :)

  46. Power Color Classic? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    links to the power colo(u)r classic

    Didn't Apple do that and call it an iSor^H^H^H^HiMac computer?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  47. Atari ST is more fun by HiroProtagonist · · Score: 1

    Ok,

    While the processor may be capable of lots of stuff.. My time is honestly worth more than hacking around in an old mac... Hell, I'd rather be hacking around in an old Atari ST ANYWAY. At least there is cool software you can get for the Atari ST, that you just can't get anywhere else.

    --
    --Remove chicken to e-mail
  48. TI-89..on a Macintosh? by MathJMendl · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else ever given serious thought into porting the TI-89 and its software to the Macintosh? I mean, they both have 68k processors.. and it would be cool to do some nice big 3-D graphs on a computer screen with the 89's math software.. and it would also be good for assembly programs and for testing them. I mean, it might take a little work doing, but once it was finished it would be really cool.

    --


    "I have not failed. I've simply found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Edison
  49. My Post Is Offtopic by linuxgrp · · Score: 3

    But it has to do with getting rid of - or getting - unwanted computer hardware.

    freeboxen.com is a site for people to unload the hardware they don't want for people who do. I just stumbled across it in another thread. It could really use some support. What a great idea!
    -- --
    Stay Tuned Next Week For...
    The Adventures of Open Souce Man!

    --
    -- --
    Stay Tuned Next Week For...
    The Adventures of Open Souce Man!
    (with Natalie Portman and her Aibo)
  50. Imagine the equivalent PC story.. by Dacta · · Score: 1

    You can stick a PIII motherboard in your old 286AT case! (Around the same vintage as the colour classics)

    You can replace the 5 1/4 inch with a CDROM and you can replace the old CGA monitor with a 21 inch Sony, and it will all run fine!!

    Oh, wait.. I had a computer like that.. so does everyone else I know.

    I (actually my parents) had a Mac+ for a while (before that they had one of the original 128K Mac, too). Did you know that upgrading the RAM invalidated to warrenty?

    They were nice machines, in 1984.

    1. Re:Imagine the equivalent PC story.. by noweb4u · · Score: 1

      I have a 333 K6-2 with 128M of RAM in my 286 case, it has two harddrives, and two CD-ROM drives in the place of the one HD and the 5 1/4" Floppies.
      I then overclocked the 333 to 350, so *I* win heheheeheh :-)

  51. it's already been done. by mcc · · Score: 2

    A TI-92 emulator for the macintosh is available here.

    I don't think the emulator in question actually works on 68k macintoshes, it claims to requrie a 100Mhz PPC, though a VMWare-style hardware abstraction hack with almost no slowdown would be pretty easy to throw together for a 68k mac i'd imagine. Assuming anyone actually was WILLING to.

  52. Don Knotts guy by elegant7x · · Score: 1

    I was invited into the 'elite troll guild' or whatever a while back, but currently I have no idea whats going on in the 'community' any more. While trolling was fun for me, it was just to time consuming.

    Anyway, while there were really multiple communitys based on diffrent goals, one of the things I always hated was the 'don knots/CNN' guy. The guy that would post the same link to the same fsking page over, and over, and over again. What kind of reativity was that? I it was just so annoying.

    Anyway, I just wanted to vent about the DK guy. God, what an idiot.

    Amber Yuan 2k A.D

    --

    "and dear god does this website suck now." -- CmdrTaco
  53. Look at Atari and Amiga for real hardware hackery by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 2

    Wow, so it's shoehorning a modern motherboard into an older machine. Nothing like the old days of hardware upgrades, when you could upgrade your processor by soldering daughterboards straight on to the original motherboard (which invariably wasn't designed to be upgraded in any way).

    I know Amiga people got up to loads of stuff (including PowerPC upgrades), but the Atari people did quite a lot too. here is an example of a modern Atari upgrade; there were lots more in the past. One popular example was putting a 32MHz 68030 into an 8MHz 68000 machine (requiring lots of new circuitry), while others included the addition of modern PCI graphics cards, faster serial ports, HD floppy support in older Ataris, switchable OS upgrades, and so on.

    My old ST at home has a 4MB memory upgrade (that involved soldering wires on to the surface-mounted MMU, my ST being of a particularly perverse design) and a TOS 2.06 ROM upgrade (great fun that - a daughterboard soldered directly on to the 68000 itself, and a tiny software utility to switch between the old TOS 1.02 ROMS and the new TOS 2.06 ROM, for compatibility with old games etc). It also has a SCSI host adapter (it looks just like a normal cable, except there's a custom chip inside the SCSI plug end).

    It gets on my nerves when people say how brave they were coping with, say, a 50MHz machine. I used my old 8MHz ST for useful stuff, and until recently it was being used by my mum for word-processing with Papyrus. By that I mean full page layout, WYSIWYG, a modern, non-modal interface, TrueType/Speedo vector fonts, 300dpi output (usually) keeping up with a DeskJet 600, etc etc etc. And all fast enough to keep up with my mum's very fast typing. If a program was released for Linux which had an identical interface and identical features, I would get it straight away. And imagine a lot of other people would, too. :-)

    The ST was only retired because the keyboard doesn't work so well after 12 years of constant use - the space bar's a bit dead. :-/

    Ford Prefect

    --
    Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  54. Re:Real mode? Who cares? by Spatch3 · · Score: 1

    the fact is no one does care and 386+ has been optomized to run in protected mode ever since because of that severe real mode limitation. Every processor out there, by the way, runs faster in real mode than in protected mode, even the x86. That is why it is such a stupid hack: it was the only thing Intel could have done in order to keep their very stupid processor architecture from dying after the 8088.

    Every rule has an exception, and this is the only rule with no exceptions! Huh? -- Spatch

    --

    Every rule has an exception, and this is the only rule with no exceptions! Huh? -- Spatch
  55. 'svelte', 'chic' and 'powerful' by phwiffo · · Score: 1

    This continues to point out the fact that people want small computers that are cheap but not comprimised. A compact car that you can still get under the hood, if you will.

    --


    Trolls, it must be cool to be that bored.
  56. haha by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    The mouse must have been a PC fan, he showed you what he thought of macs.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  57. Is this really necessary? by Mutok · · Score: 1

    I can appreciate the nostalgia of using souped-up old machines (we've all seen those people with cool retro cars we all want), but a computer can be a thing of pride without the fancy (or not so fancy being the case... no pun intended) stylings or most powerful hardware. I loved my old Packard Bell 120mhz machine, telling people i was using it when ripping them to shreds in TFC (Half-Life needs a 133), but I replaced it with a custom build. The new one is better, and I am just as proud.

  58. Forget the Pentium??? But... But.... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1
    But...

    It's all about the Pentiums.... BABY

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:Forget the Pentium??? But... But.... by Free+Bird · · Score: 1
      But...

      It's all about the Athlons.... BABY

    2. Re:Forget the Pentium??? But... But.... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1
      Uh.. yeah, right.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    3. Re:Forget the Pentium??? But... But.... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1
      Sure...

      And all the trollers on slashdot are liable if I pour hot grits down my pants and burn myself.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  59. That's nothing! by / · · Score: 3

    I'm working on fitting an entire computing lab inside a converted ENIAC. A whole 3000 cubic feet, baby!

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
    1. Re:That's nothing! by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but you'll have to get some monster fans to cover the noise of the grad students...

      Although I think this machine would be the first to pass a turing test :)
      ---

      --
      --
      Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  60. Re:My Post Is Offtopic -- No, it's not by Kris_J · · Score: 2

    What a wonderful service. I've posted four items so far. Medium sized companies like where I'm at have heaps of $0 value stuff that real computer freaks would drool at. I strongly recommend that everyone post their useless crap on this site!

  61. OOG is NOT a troll. by Darby · · Score: 1

    Most trolls are just complete idiots, but I'll agree that some of them are funny.

    However, OOG is not a troll. If you had ever bothered to read his posts you would realize that he posts on topic. While not always insightful his posts are generally interesting and since he doesn't post that often I would assume that he mainly posts when he knows something about the subject.

    Just because he came up with an original style doesn't make him a troll.


    ---CONFLICT!!---

  62. Yeah, but it still doesn't.... by wholesomegrits · · Score: 1

    top the ultimate hardware hack ever:
    the MacQuarium.

    Gutted Mac Classic, Classic II or SE. The monitor is removed and cut glass installed to make a fish bowl.

    Advantages over current hardware: crash resitant, near perfect implementation of artifical intelligence (how smart are fish anyway? They'll eat themselves to death). Much more enjoyable than psuedo fishtank screensavers.

    Disad: Crash leads to death, requires 24/7 uptime and system monitoring. Operating elements will sometimes eat each other.

    The plans are here.

    --
    No sig is worth reading.
    1. Re:Yeah, but it still doesn't.... by fatbeano · · Score: 1

      On the thread of Mac Classics... (pain and suffering while we are at it)...

      Mac PC

      Yes, the screenshots are horrible. I will post more and feed it a webpage when i get a new camera, and correct some of the problems associated with the LCD inverter. It had Win98 on it for shock value, not for functionality. These days it has NT4, Slack, and BeOS.

      fb

  63. Re:It must be said by Spatch3 · · Score: 1

    > Why is it that Mac zealots are almost uniformly
    > stupid? Is it because the intelligent Mac Users
    > aren't zealots? I think so. Ether that, or only
    > stupid people like Macs...

    Flattery will get you no where. But seriously, what can I say I had to respond to the original troll.

    > I have never in my life heard of a chip called
    > the 8085. are you talking about the 8088? Witch
    > was wankyer, but came out later? (used an 8bit
    > bus, instead of a 16bit bus like the 8086)

    If I remember my history correctly, the 8085 was an 8 bit processor that was popular with the CP/M crowd. It of course could only address up to 64 K of ram, so Intel came up with that backward, upside down memory model of segment/offset so that programs written for the 8085 could run on the 8086. It's too bad Intel didn't know to do away with that legacy memory model and go with a flat one, oh well.

    > I guess you've never heard of PnP ISA, not that
    > it matters, ISA's on the way out. Anyway, if you
    > want true plug and play, just don't buy any ISA
    > cards, it isn't that hard...

    I have heard of PnP ISA and it simply doesn't work! I don't know how many conflicts I have had to manually solve in windows 95, 98 of supposedly "PnP" ISA hardware. PCI doesn't do this...

    > Serial and parallel ports are very useful, in
    > that you can hack something up in your garage
    > that can interface with it.

    They are very useful, so is the joystick port for extremely simple devices to be developed. What is extremely unuseful is for every com port an IRQ taken up (IRQ sharing for the most part DOESN"T WORK!). If you want to get any kind of bandwidth out of parallel, you need to use a DMA port, and of course every parallel port uses an IRQ. Why introduce all of that potentional conflict with you can have a single controller that controls all those devices with a single set of resources like the USB root hub?

    > I'd like to see you build a USB device by hand.

    I wouldn't want to. But then neither would I build a serial or parallel device by hand, even though I know it would be easier.

    > Am I supposed to be impressed by your mad daisy
    > chaining abilities? Another thing that's always
    > bothered me is Mac users tendency's to elevate
    > the lamest Mac features to amazing heights.
    > "Ohhh. You can eject the floppy without pushing a
    > button!!!!!"

    Yeah, but it is annoying to have to use a paperclip to eject it manually sometimes too. Seriously, you can plug a mouse into a keyboard port on a PC or vice versa and royally f*ck yourself. ADB (Apple Desktop Bus) and USB have been idiot proofed so that you cannot do this.

    > If you could address more then 1 meg of ram in
    > real mode, it would be real mode, it would be
    > some other mode. And real mode would have to be
    > put back in for Backwards compatibility. Anyway,
    > none of this matters because the CPUs have other
    > modes, and everyone uses protected mode, witch
    > lets you get up to 36gigs of ram.

    Well, I don't think that a model that relies on protected mode and REQUIRES virtual memory to run is very efficient. Try running Age of empires with 128 MB or RAM and disable Virtual memory, Will it run??? :)

    > > FPU on an x86? What a joke!!!

    > Ever year of the Athlon? 4 floating point ops per
    > cycle, and you can buy one that runs at 1ghz
    > today. When your CPU maxes out at 500mhz,
    > everything is a joke...

    The x86's FPU will never be the fastest becuase of inherent limitations in which the FPU is accessed. I have heard of AMD getting around this with the Athlon making the FPU faster, however, if you really want to see the real scoop, check this site out:

    http://bwrc.eecs.berkeley.edu/CIC/summary/local/ summary.pdf

    The newest Pentium III's and Athlons have very fast FPUs, faster even than the fastest G4's, however they don't have anything on the Newest ALphas, Sparc III's or R12000 processors...


    Every rule has an exception, and this is the only rule with no exceptions! Huh? -- Spatch

    --

    Every rule has an exception, and this is the only rule with no exceptions! Huh? -- Spatch
  64. Re:um, no, this is better than most stories. by Fourthstring · · Score: 1

    And if the person you're responding to knew that Slashdot is considered 'VA Linux' turf by certain competitors... He has no idea who the songwriter is, who probably works in San Francisco.

  65. 500hp Yugo: Car Craft mag beat you to the punch. by SoupIsGood+Food · · Score: 1

    Car Craft put a 500hp V-8 in a Chevette...just 'cuz they could. It kicked major ass, and was a great exapmple of the hacker mentality hard at work in the hot-rodding scene.

    This month's Hot Rod has an article about a guy who dropped a turbocharged Thunderbird engine and a lot of custom intercooler crap into a '71 pinto. Again, way fast and way neat. Beige boxes (or '69 Chevelles and '78 Camaros and '84 Mustangs...the automotive equivalent of beige boxes) suck. Freak power rules.

    SoupIsGood Food

  66. Apple pricing? by Miskatonic · · Score: 1

    Geez, I knew Apple charged too much for their computers, but if people are going to these lengths, apparently things have really gotten out of hand! ;-)

  67. Re:What's wrong with 68k? What's wrong with 6502? by gerti · · Score: 2

    > These things have been in common use since the 70's when they ran the first Macs.

    The first Mac was released in April 1984. In the late 70's ('79 if I'm correct), the Apple ][ (two) and Apple ][+ were very popular machines, the first home computers to have colour graphics. These machines used the 6502 processor.

    Later Apples, the Apple //e and the Apple //c, used a 65C02 cpu. Lots of people put a z80 card in one of the Apple ]['s expansion slots, so you could run cp/m as well (the Apple ][ user could choose DOS 3.3, ProDOS, USCD Pascal and CP/M as an OS).

    The first Macs used the Motorola 68000, later Macs had 68020, 68030 or 68040 processors. Unfortunately, in lots of late-68K Macs, Apple put 68LC040s, a 68040 without a copro. The problem with early models of the 68LC040 is that copro emulation wouldn't work due to a bug in the cpu that would destroy the stack pointer. a Bad Thing(tm) indeed.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I suffer from acute nostalgia. I'm off to do some vintage computing on one of my Apple ]['s.

  68. Nah according to Intel the PII is where its at... by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 1

    In shock new intel says the PII is the best overall choice for the majority of PC users and applications

    So who's gonna stuff a PII into a MAC Classic or an i-Mac

  69. Wow by Skinka · · Score: 2
    First OOG_THE_CAVEMAN and now stuff like this. Slashdot really needs some kind of "troll archive" where people can go and read the funniest comments (comment searching only covers the last 30k comments). I hear a lot people mention MEEPT, who supposedly was real funny guy, but there is no way I can find any comments posted by him =(

    So a few people who actively visit slashdot could handpick the best trolls so that I can show my future kids just how funny OOG was.

    1. Re:Wow by fluxrad · · Score: 1

      you know...that's one hell of an idea. I wouldn't mind setting that up on something like freeshell. or even hotgrits.org (yes..it's there now).

      Moderation is the sincerest form of flattery.


      FluX
      After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

      --
      "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  70. MEEPT by DrSpoo · · Score: 1

    In his day, the incredible MEEPT always made me laugh. He was one of the first trolls on /. but his posts were always classic. I think he's still around, but doesn't post nearly as often ... which is a shame.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  71. Troll's "hack" /. by philg · · Score: 2

    That's not a headline, but an observation. /. has a very complicated moderation scheme in effect. Trolls like this one seem an awfully lot like hackers -- they find creative ways around the moderation system. And they aren't malicious; rather, the way they've found to hack the system is to post stuff that is so entertaining that moderators mod it up, even though it is off-topic.

    They've had to get creative because the system is actively hostile to them and to their speech. And that is a good thing too; not only does it keep most visible discussion on-topic and interesting, it makes the filtering process for the best trolls very rigorous, and keeps troll quality (yes, I said that) high. At least, the quality of trolls that get this far are of high quality. (Or maybe the moderators are just high. On life, of course.)

    (I even think of it as an artistic commentary of the dynamics of free speech with a low S/N ratio versus controlled (therefore not completely free) speech with a high S/N ratio. But I doubt that argument will go over highly here....)

    That's just my little defense of the trolls; they've had to get so entertaining and creative that they deserve a little praise, IMO. Enjoy tearing it to shreds.

    phil (hoping he gets a reply from OOG, and, hey, I didn't need my karma anyway)

  72. Re:68K > 10MHz, more like 25 or 33! by swb · · Score: 1

    The Mac IIfx had a 40Mhz 68030 CPU. I can remember an article in Mac{User|World|Week) comparing it to lower-end Sun and HP Apollo workstations. It wasn't priced that far off when it was first released 10 years ago. It must have been pretty beefy compared to its siblings, as it had a lifespan of 2 years before being discontinued.

  73. Apple IIe -> 9600/300 by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


    I have been searching for that web page for a while now. It was a japanese web page, but unfortunately, I haven't been able to relocate it. I agree with you. That hardware transformation represented a much greater technological daredevil leap than this one. Especially considering the expense (at the time) of the 9600/300 the guy was sacrificing for the project. If anyone knows of the URL to THAT page, please forward it to me.



    Seth
  74. Hypocracy Alert...Warning by B-B · · Score: 1

    Uhhh...You said:

    Mac Users love to go on and on about there love, there company, and how much PCs suck (and, how much there users must be stupid to use them).

    Then:

    I can only be insulted so many times by a user base before I start to revile them

    And then:

    no one advocates Microsoft 'cept for brainwashed MCSEs, who are too unintelligent to count.

    So, are you logic-impaired, dealing with cranial-rectal inversion, or simply really stoopid.

    Just a question, Troll.

    Tom

    --
    Reality does not happen until you analyze the dots. -Don DeLillo (Underworld)
  75. Fact check: Macs in the '70s? by gnubie · · Score: 1
    > These things have been in common use since the 70's when they ran the first Macs

    The 68Ks have been around for a good long time, and are extraordinarily versatile. However,the first Macs debuted in 1984...

    --

    --

  76. Re:Geez, by B-B · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, An Athlon w/ 256 MB RAM or my G4-500 with 768 MB RAM.

    See how easy it is to fsck with either-or constructs?

    One is a current machine (Athlon), pretty decent, but nothing to write home about. One is a really cool hack.

    Tom

    --
    Reality does not happen until you analyze the dots. -Don DeLillo (Underworld)
  77. Gwak by fatbeano · · Score: 1
    Mac PC

    No webpage yet. That's coming soon.

  78. Don't short-change the 68030! by Oarboat_7 · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a recent adopter of NetBSD-Mac68k, let me say that it's been an adventure to get it running on an old SE/30 that I picked up last month at a swapmeet for $10. I beefed it up with 32 Megs of RAM, a 1 gig SCSI hard drive, and it's a fun little Unix box now. I'm learning to cope with the one-bit 512x348 screen, and using it as a 'bare bones' system. The limited screen architecture, and the limited X11 that's installed by default forces me to learn a lot of the real core technology just to make it a useful machine. I've become a Tab Windows Manager (TWM) enthusiast, for instance. It is nice that all that TWM stuff in the numbered O'Reilly X Windows volumes is finally coming in handy. I finally got backspace to work last nightn an Xterm (xkeycaps then doctoring up an .Xmodmap file).

    Minimalism provides good experience, in my estimation.

    So if you have an SE/30 laying around, give NetBSD-68K a shot. It's fun.

  79. Re:*** ZEALOT WATCH: Amiga Zealot ON THE LOOSE *** by Paradigm+Lost · · Score: 1

    Don't be alarmed. I actually got over my Amiga zealotry after several years of counselling.

    I am now obsessed with my iMac. Gently fondling its curves, running my fingers delicately over its mouse, repeatedly inserting CDs into its willing slot before finally penetrating both of its microphone jacks...

    I have to go shower now.
    (I still feel like I'm cheating on Agnes and Denise)

    --
    -Dead Lesbian Witches! Think about it!
  80. Re:It must be said by Oarboat_7 · · Score: 1

    Whoever you are, you sure typed a lot of extra words after that sentence "I never heard of an 8085." I call it extra words because it doesn't matter what you said. That sentence was so appallingly ignorant that I stopped reading after it.

    Get a clue. If you don't know what you're talking about, don't say anything. Maybe you'll learn something by listening.

  81. 68k vs x86... and how about that future? by LoonXTall · · Score: 1

    And m68k assembler just kicks the crud out of x86... have you ever looked at that stuff?

    Having had the opportunity to program both x86's (NASM) and an Amiga 500 (Assempro) in assembly, I can say that 680x0 assembly rocks. I mean, you put in MULU d7,d3 and it multiplies the LSW of d3 and d7 and puts the result in d7! None of this EDX:EAX crud. (No memory seg:ofs either, and all the fun that causes with DMA, DOS, and real vs. protected mode.) Also, note the comments in the dnet source about the x86's lack of registers. Amiga calls were a bit more involved than DOS's, but there were a lot more of them, too. It would probably be fairer to compare the Amiga (Workbench 1.3, 1989-ish) to Windows 95 in terms of complexity.

    I foresee a future where x86 programming just becomes impossible because of all the layers... real, protected, virtual real, mode64, virtual protected... MMX, SSE, 64BE. Some of those were made up as a possibility of what could happen if (hypothetical) 64Bit Extensions were added to the 32bit Intel Architecture. When this future arrives, before Microsoft gets Windows onto it, a new window of entry will open... for a computer to open the gates to 64-bit computing with sensible instructions. Port Linux... add user-friendliness (hey, with a new bus arch. we could define a new protocol for graphics cards, so any X64 card would work!)... and grin. And begin development for 128-bit platforms.


    -- LoonXTall
    --

    ~~~LXT~~~
    Life is like a computer program: anything that can't happen, will.

  82. Re:Ohh, MAN! Not again! by Free+Bird · · Score: 1

    Duh... Off course I know the difference between a CPU and a computer, but that's besides the point.

  83. For crying out loud, kids (the 8085) by hawk · · Score: 2

    Isn't *anyone* old enough to remember this stuff?

    The 8085 was an 8 bit successor to the 8080, but a *very* week response to the z80 from zilog, an upwards-compatible to the 8080 developed by engineers who left intel.

    The 8085 had a little bit of serial i/o on chip, and a couple of extra interrupts. It did *not* implement the extended instruction set of the z80.

    CP/M ran on the 8080, and therefore the Z80. Most programs were written to the 8080 so that they could run on both; it tended to be only machine specific code that was written in Z80. The z80 was also 5v instead of needing three supplies.

    The 8086 was source compatible with the 8080, not the 8085--it didn't have those extras. You could also cross-compile z80 source to the 8086.

    The 8088 came out simultaneously with the 8086; it was the same thing (almost) on an 8 bit buss. ISTR that there was a load you could use t see which you were using because a buffer (?) was a different size onthe two chips, which would yield a different result.

    If memory serves, the 8085 was announced at the same time as the 8086, but don't hold me to that.

    hawk

  84. Got a link that can best this hands down by proto · · Score: 1


    Posted on Slashdot last year. A Mac Plus that runs at 1Ghz.
    Maybe those old Macs still have a life after all?

  85. Not a 68K, just a case by TWR · · Score: 1
    The title of the /. article is seriously misleading. They aren't hacking a 68K machine. They are hacking the CASE of a 68K machine. If you read through the site, you'll see that the innards of these machines have all been replaced by PowerPCs (in one case, a G3).

    Considering how cramped those cases are, this is pretty impressive demonstration of how cool the PowerPC chips run. Imagine stuffing a PIII into a case that size, with the monitor, hard drive, and an Ethernet card!

    -jon

    --

    Remember Amalek.

  86. Going going gone... by sad_ · · Score: 1

    The nice and old Amiga 1200 has combined 68k and PPC add-on boards. no wait, even G4 boards. ofcourse it's not cool for /.-readers 'coz it has the word "Amiga" in it.
    The amiga with G4 will even be able to run Tao/elate! (these things even run linuxppc:)
    anyway, you don't know how cool this is until you've seen one in action...

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  87. Re:68K > 10MHz, more like 25 or 33! by Battra · · Score: 1

    The Nitro was kind of the legendary holy grail of NeXT computing.

    Here's a site with good info on the Nitro board:

    http://www.channelu.com/NeXT/Black/Nitro/

    Sam Goldberger of Spherical Solutions hacked up a 60Mhz board called the Pyro that he was selling from his site for a long time. I don't know where he is now, orb.com seems to have been taken over by the aggressively commercial orb.net.

    NetBSD should run on your cube, and there is a 68k linux project out there, but I'm not sure if they are supporting the NeXT hardware or not.

    I have used my 030 cube for ages, it made a great web server, AppleShare file server, and everything else I ever asked it to do.

  88. Stormie, can you imagine.... by cvillopillil · · Score: 1

    A BEOWULF CLUSTER of these???????

    --
    no sig
  89. Yeah buddy... by Enahs · · Score: 1

    What you need is a good butane regulator, and this here's the best they make.

    No shit...maybe soon I'll turn my K6-300 based machine into an 800Mhz Athlon-based machine, and get put on Slashdot. Hell, that's what this story sounds like. :^P

    I'd like to take one of those stupid-ass new teensy-tiny Compaq Presario cases and find a way to shove some real, off-the-shelf hardware into one. ;^)

    --
    Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
  90. LMAO by BasharTeg · · Score: 1

    Jesus, man. You just made me choke and suck a sunflower seed down my throat. sigh. :)

  91. Re: I HACKED A PICKLE JAR TO STORE APPLESAUCE! by BasharTeg · · Score: 1

    OMFG, you fucking rule dude. After reading that other one I could barely breathe. Your post nearly killed me. LMAO

  92. Re:Apple IIe to 9600/300 ... Some Links ... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


    Great work, Yarldey! I can read and write a little Japanese, so I'm going to send an e-mail to the Treasure Tracing Club to find out if they have any update link to that Apple][e conversion project. I'll let you know what they say.

    Thanks a lot!



    Seth
  93. Speaking of Vintage Macs on Steroids... by aithon · · Score: 1

    I'm rooting around here for the only Mac Plus web server... I don't know how the hell he did it, but here it is:

    http://macplus.schoolvision.com/

    I actually have one of those old Color Classics at home. I've got the thing upgraded to an '040. With a big processor and a tiny screen, it sort of makes me think of a porche.

    --
    Fear the wrath of Ares' Horse of Fire
  94. Re:Geez, by Fervent · · Score: 1

    When you can get a decent framerate at Unreal Tournament on a Mac, even the highest end one, give me a ring.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.