Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft's New Spamming Technique

judges1617 writes: "Microsoft is now testing a beta version of their MSN Explorer that sends e-mails to everyone in your Outlook Address, informing them that your e-mail address has changed and invites them to to try MSN. Even the people who use MSN are complaining, but M$ refuses to acknowledge it is doing anything wrong. Read the whole story here" The best part of this article is the MS reps argument about why this isn't spam "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer." I guess we can add "Spamming" as another "Business" where Microsoft can use its monopoly status to its advantage.

247 comments

  1. wow by xtermz · · Score: 1

    doesnt surprise me one bit . microsoft and their holier than thou phylosophy (sp?)

    "sex on tv is bad, you might fall off..."

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
    1. Re:wow by xtermz · · Score: 1

      YEA! this from a guy whos too much of a pussy to use his name!!!

      "sex on tv is bad, you might fall off..."

      --


      I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
  2. I like spam. by helleman · · Score: 1

    Tastes kind of like ham - add it to Kraft Dinner for a tasty treat!

    Thanks Microsoft!

  3. Email address books are for wimps by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 2

    Really, if you can't memorize the email addresses of the hundred or so people and mailing lists with whom you regularly correspond, you shouldn't be using a computer.

    Criminy, what next, complaining about Explorer's bookmark files? Really, if you can't memorize the thousand or so web addies your regularly surf to, you shouldn't be on the web.

    1. Re:Email address books are for wimps by Tackhead · · Score: 4
      if you can't memorize the email addresses of the hundred or so people and mailing lists with whom you regularly correspond, you shouldn't be using a computer.

      Actually, while I think you meant it in jest, I think it's true.

      My name isn't unique. There are a million John Does in the world. At work, I'm john_doe@johndoescompany.com, and at home, I'm jd@johndoesisp.net. Those are two unique identities.

      Nothing bugs me more than carrying on a conversation with foo@bar.com, and having him "reply" to the wrong address because "John Doe"'s work address is above his home address in foo@bar.com's "address book". Not only do I not necessarily want personal correspondance at work, but now I have to forward that mail *back to my home address* if I want to keep a record of it in one place.

      Email addresses uniquely identify users. Names don't. We expect total drooling fuckwits to be capable of associating phone numbers (7 to 10 arbitrary digits) with individuals, so it's actually pretty goddamn reasonable to expect them to be able to associate an email address (a pronounceable string of characters often bearing a striking resemblance to the person's name) with an individual too.

      And as for those who are saying that "mailing everyone in your address book when you change addresses isn't spam", read the article.

      If it mailed everyone in your address book with "Hi. This is John Doe. I'm now on MSN and my address is john_doe@m_s_n_dot_com", it would be a misfeature, but forgivable.

      It doesn't.

      It says "I recently began using a new product from Microsoft called MSN Explorer. With MSN Explorer, you can send and receive e-mail, exchange instant messages with me and the millions of other people who use MSN Explorer, browse the Web and much more. MSN Explorer even offers an exciting new look for using the web and makes it easy to find and play music online. Want to try it out? It's FREE! Just click on the link below and follow the download instructions", and presumably follows it with a link to a Trojan. (Yeah, I consider MSN a trojan. Deal with it.) 100,000 quatloos says the spam's in fuckin' HTML, too.

      If it walks like spam, smells like spam, and is made from potted meat product like spam, it bloody well is spam.

      I've just added the strings in the above-quoted spam to my procmail filter. The response will be "550 MSN auto-generated spam rejected. Use a real ISP that doesn't turn you into a spammer."

      As for Bill Gates and the marketer who came up with this shit, anyone whose sole view of the world is their own lower digestive tract should not be permitted to come within 20 feet of a computer, much less one attached to the 'net.

    2. Re:Email address books are for wimps by Bieeardo · · Score: 1
      Jesus H. Xrist, that's fugging insane. Not only does it send these spams out, it tries to pass itself off as the sender-- bloody wonderful.

      If my friends want me to try MSN Explorer, they can tell me to my face. That way I can laugh in theirs immediately afterwards.

      I cannot believe that these idiots are trying to claim that it isn't spam. It's auto-generated; it's ad-copy; and it's offensive to one's intelligence. What's next-- a .sig that reads "This e-mail generated by Outlook Express. Click "here" for details"?

      --

      Five tons of flax.

    3. Re:Email address books are for wimps by flybait · · Score: 1

      What's next-- a .sig that reads "This e-mail generated by Outlook Express. Click "here" for details"?

      Haven't patented that idea yet, I hope.

      Damn, now where did I put Bill's e-address?

      --
      -- we'll eat the fat ones first
    4. Re:Email address books are for wimps by Tackhead · · Score: 4
      > I cannot believe that these idiots are trying to claim that it isn't spam. It's auto-generated; it's ad-copy; and it's offensive to one's intelligence.

      "This is not spam!" is the first cry of the spammer.

      0) Spam is theft.
      1) Spammers lie.
      2) If you think a spammer's telling the truth, see Rule #1.
      3) Spammers are st00pid.

      (Footnote: Actually, "OooOOOOOHhonnnngggh! is the cry of the spammer. After I pound its balls flat with a mallet. The bit about "It wasn't spam, it was invitation to buy my product" only comes after they've regained the ability to speak. This is poor practice: when you whack a spammer, do it like you mean it. If properly whacked, the bits of goo around the server room will never recongeal into anything that has the ability to speak.)

    5. Re:Email address books are for wimps by Kevin+T. · · Score: 1

      Nothing bugs me more than carrying on a conversation with foo@bar.com, and having him "reply" to the wrong address because "John Doe"'s work address is above his home address in foo@bar.com's "address book". Not only do I not necessarily want personal correspondance at work, but now I have to forward that mail *back to my home address* if I want to keep a record of it in one place.

      Why not just raise the standard to "anyone who can't use an e-mail address book properly shouldn't be using e-mail"? If they have your home e-mail address, you're probably their friend and could include helpful hints like "I'm at work, but please reply to home address b/c...."

      Really. I have no sympathy for 'ya. Even my mom knows not to e-mail me at my work address, and she uses AOL on a Mac.

    6. Re:Email address books are for wimps by Kitanin · · Score: 1
      I've just added the strings in the above-quoted spam to my procmail filter. The response will be ``550 MSN auto-generated spam rejected. Use a real ISP that doesn't turn you into a spammer.''

      Oh, you're no fun anymore. It should return a malformed number (``666 Away with ye, foul beastie!'', perhaps, or ``1060 West Addison''), so that you wedge M$'s servers and trash their clients. :-)

      Note: I do not actually recommend this. People who don't return proper error codes PISS ME OFF! If you do this, I will track you down for them.

      --


      Teach your kids: "C++ made baby Jesus cry."
    7. Re:Email address books are for wimps by ralmeida · · Score: 1

      "This is not spam!" is the first cry of the spammer.

      I received an e-mail a few days ago that said "this is not spam, because according to the International Conference on Spam this e-mail says how you can be excluded from our list... bla bla bla... if you don't press the link in one week we will assume you want to receive e-mail from us... bla bla bla... this is not spam. Thank you."

      What could be more spam than this?!?

      I wrote back, "to stop being harassed by me you have to kill a black cow and bury it in a friday 13th under a black bridge -- only by doing this you'll be removed from our list. Otherwise, I assume you want to receive a dead donkey in your office every day. According to the International Conference on Spam this e-mail cannot be considered spam because it says how you can be excluded from my list. Thank you.

      --

      --
      This space left intentionally blank.
    8. Re:Email address books are for wimps by mph · · Score: 1
      We expect total drooling fuckwits to be capable of associating phone numbers (7 to 10 arbitrary digits) with individuals

      Tell that to my PDA and my speed dial.

      --Total Drooling Fuckwit
    9. Re:Email address books are for wimps by llywrch · · Score: 2

      >Footnote: Actually, "OooOOOOOHhonnnngggh! is the cry of the spammer. After I pound its balls flat with a mallet.

      To pick a nit here: if a spammer is an ``it", by definition a spammer is neither male nor female, & thus does not have testes (aka balls).

      So how painful *is* the cry of a spammer when you crush its spores?

      Geoff

      --
      I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
    10. Re:Email address books are for wimps by David+A.+Madore · · Score: 2

      Damn, now where did I put Bill's e-address?

      It's billg@microsoft.com .

      --
      This slashdot post generated by Mozilla. Click "here" for details.

    11. Re:Email address books are for wimps by include · · Score: 1

      Wow I love moments like these, Im guessing you're not stupid so I'll put the blame down to the English language. The SENDER is the SPAMMER, thats the DEFINITION. Sending unsolicted email is SPAM! The people who send get rich quick, apart from being greedy and stupid are also SPAMMERS. Microsoft did not send the email, therefore MS are not spammers. In terms of cause and effect, you pressing OK was the cause, the email going out was the effect, ie no MS involvement there at all.
      Thankyou and here endeth the lesson.

  4. Microsoft Bizzniss Tactics by Fatal0E · · Score: 2

    Chapter U: It's not wrong if we do it. Chapter V: If it is indeed wrong, litigate, litigate and obfiscate then litigate some more.

  5. Doesn't this violate the "virus" laws? by plover · · Score: 3

    I mean if you can be busted for writing Melissa, (which behaves in an identical manner) why not for this?

    --
    John
    1. Re:Doesn't this violate the "virus" laws? by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

      This one doesn't propigate itself... Yet...

      How about that for a virii... A script that makes Outlook think that you've changed your e-dress and spams everyone.

      Not that I would, or could, do such a thing...

      NecroPuppy

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    2. Re:Doesn't this violate the "virus" laws? by emmatheodd · · Score: 1

      I mean if you can be busted for writing Melissa, (which behaves in an identical manner) why not for this?

      because it's not a virus. as described in the article, the user first has to agree to import their outlook address book, then affirm that they want to mail everyone in it to notify them of the new address, then they are shown the message and they have to confirm that they want to send it.

      no, it's not a good idea. yes, it's kind of spammish. but it's nothing like a virus.

    3. Re:Doesn't this violate the "virus" laws? by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      So if Melissa was nice enough to put up message boxes with OK and cancel, it would be legal?

  6. Multiple email accounts by semaj · · Score: 3

    I have several email accounts, for different reasons. If they all spontaneously decided to tell everyone to use one account, where would I be?

    I don't see why this shouldn't be an /option/, but as the default it does seem a bit weird.


    -

    --
    Meep meep
    1. Re:Multiple email accounts by Tower · · Score: 1

      Don't use Outlook and don't keep any names in the Outlook address book.

      --

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    2. Re:Multiple email accounts by semaj · · Score: 1

      Outlook syncs to my mobile phone, point me to another program that does that, and I'll use it.

      -

      --
      Meep meep
    3. Re:Multiple email accounts by Tower · · Score: 1

      OK, new solution - ditch mobile leash^H^H^H^H^Hphone ;-)
      --

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
    4. Re:Multiple email accounts by jesser · · Score: 2
      Outlook syncs to my mobile phone, point me to another program that does that, and I'll use it.

      An older version of Outlook Express used to add everyone who sent me a signed e-mail to my address book wihtout asking me. Now it adds everyone to my address book who sends me an e-mail with a "from" address and name.

      --

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    5. Re:Multiple email accounts by Jim+the+Bad · · Score: 1

      DI27 for PalmOS. Works for me! ;)

      --
      -- And when Justice is gone, there is always... Force. --Laurie Anderson, "Oh Superman"
  7. New Name... by __aawksi5008 · · Score: 1

    Maybe we should quit calling them Micro$oft and start calling them

    Microspam!

    Yes, yes, I know. Tacky. But I couldn't help myself.
    Rani

    1. Re:New Name... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      It would be apropriate.

      They once again sent me an "Update" email from their "Freedom To Innovate" (or was that annoy) people.

      The last one that they sent me had an invalid reply-to. I was replying to tell them that I resent being added to an email list that I never asked for.

      Whats worst... tI get this email today...AFTER
      trying to get off the list, last time that they sent me one.

      Microspam indeed.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:New Name... by King+of+the+World · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that'd show them.

      What?

    3. Re:New Name... by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      MS has spammed me cold in 1997 and 1998, and they blatantly ignored all of my remove requests. The only solution I found, eventually, was give up that address altogether. My experience is, if you make it on one of their mailing lists, you're as good as dead. Maybe they've changed in the last 2 years, but I really don't want to know.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    4. Re:New Name... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Yup....I know.

      I did that, then I sent them a nasty respons
      saying that they should never send me anything again.

      It bounced...invalid return address.

      I forwarded it to postmaster@microsoft.com with a note that they should kill whicver employee is sending out messages with invalid reply addresses.

      Even though I went through their unsibscribe steps (in parallel to complaining) I was not removed.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    5. Re:New Name... by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      Use Spamcop.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    6. Re:New Name... by cjwatson · · Score: 1

      I was on their MSDN list for a while (until I just completely lost interest in it a couple of years ago), and it took me quite a while to get myself off it. In the end I just applied my standard tactic with mailing lists: filter it off to a newsgroup, where I can either read it or else unsubscribe and forget about it.

  8. Macro Viruses by Will+The+Real+Bruce · · Score: 1

    Wow, what great innovation!

    Now Microsoft has an official version of this great functionality usually only found in Macro Viruses. I guess they're just embracing-and-extending again, to bring their customers these great new features.

    Why, in a few more versions of Outlook (once everyone on Windows is forced to use it), they should have the "Goodtimes" extensions finalized, and it will turn the world into mindless Microsoft drones.

    Gentlemen, I think we have a plot for an xbill sequel on our hands.

    1. Re:Macro Viruses by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      > Wow, what great innovation!

      Moral of the story: Always patent your virus algorithm, so if you get hit by a stiff fine you can pay it off by the proceeds from your IP!

      --

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Macro Viruses by Will+The+Real+Bruce · · Score: 1

      Also, CC: everybody in the address book; if they reply to the e-mail and take the CC'ed addresses off, sue them for circumventing your protection device, mail fraud, and being a thinking human being.

    3. Re:Macro Viruses by Kronovohr · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: bounce all of them you receive to billg@microsoft.com.

  9. Microsoft Spam by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    I got one in my mailbox today, talking about the Supreme Court decision. There's not a valid return address on those things or I'd reply "You bastards! Mark my words, we'll get you!" Too bad there's not a valid return address.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Microsoft Spam by Tower · · Score: 1

      Isn't that illegal in certain states? (CA, CO, among others). String 'em up!

      --

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  10. riiiiight.... by naasking · · Score: 1

    MS reps argument about why this isn't spam "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer."

    *sigh*

    Could Microsoft possibly be more clueless? That's one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever heard.


    -----
    "People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them"
    1. Re:riiiiight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, they're used to do thinking for their users. This time they only took it a bit further. They think that the users want others to try the MSN Explorer.

    2. Re:riiiiight.... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2

      MS reps argument about why this isn't spam "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer."

      *sigh*

      Could Microsoft possibly be more clueless? That's one of the most ridiculous statements I have ever heard.


      IANAL, but couldn't the MS assumption that a given user 'wants' the people in their address book to try MS be considered false advertising?

      I mean, couldn't it be considered fraud or something???

      NecroPuppy

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    3. Re:riiiiight.... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Linux is free, in the same way that picking up a recipe leaflet in a supermarket is free. If you start assuming time is a cost, then nothing is free and virtually every company in the world will be open to lawsuits.

      Now, back to the point; the installer asks if you want to send a notification of a change of e-mail address. Nowhere do you give it permission to send out a ringing endorsement of the product. Also, the responce seems to indicate that the users wanted to invite you to try MSN Explorer. This is false in at least some cases, which sounds like pretty clear-cut fraud to me.

  11. The next I love u virus by ghoul · · Score: 1

    So next we will have a worm which sends off mail to everybody in your Outlook Address Book Saying I love Microsoft Products ,Linux Sucks and Bill Gates was the best thing to happen to computers since Charles Babbage The irony is it would serve everyone right for using MS Outlook in the first place

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  12. A bit biased by boing+boing · · Score: 5

    Jeez...this article is more about clueless newbies sending spam...the product specifically asks if you want to email ALL of your email contacts. Maybe a lot of people just didn't bother to read the message. The implementation is clearly bad, but that doesn't make the idea (allowing people who have just changed their address to send a mail to everyone they email regularly) bad.

    1. Re:A bit biased by jgerman · · Score: 3
      Before I say anything else: Windows users generally ARE clueless newbies. That's kinda M$'s market no?

      In any case it's one thing to automatically send out an informational note declaring a change of address. But I don't recall seeing anywhere M$ jinforming the user that they would be sending an ad/invitation or whatever. Most people would just assume they were sending a "hi my email address changed". Instead M$ is putting words into users mouths. They never said they wanted their contact list to try it.

      I say we all d/l the software and put a hundred or so M$ email addresses in our address books, then we can invite M$ employees, support, or whatever to try the new MSN Exploder.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    2. Re:A bit biased by markt4 · · Score: 5

      Uh, excuse me, but it seems to me that there is a significant difference between "notify the people in your address book of a change of e-mail address" and "notify the people in your address book of a change of e-mail address and include in that message a totally unsoliciated advertisement implying your endorsement of our service and we are not going to let you read this message before we send it out".

    3. Re:A bit biased by boing+boing · · Score: 2

      Of course there is a difference, but have you ever signed up for an online service of some sort? Almost every damn service these days will send the same sort of stupid message. This is not a case of Microsoft being EVIL, it is a case of MARKETING people thinking something stupid. Any large venture will put this sort of horrible advertising in. I'm not saying it's not wrong to do, I'm just saying why does this deserve an article when thousands of other products and companies do this. The implementation is clearly bad in that they don't give you a chance to edit the message, but like I said the idea is not so bad.

    4. Re:A bit biased by dr_strangelove · · Score: 1

      Now THIS is an excellent idea! Show the slugs what their "marketing" BS looks like from the receiving end. As an addition, I'd suggest getting into the code and "tweaking" the message a bit...

      Example: "Hi! I just got fooled into sending spam by the MS market-droids! You can be an idiot too! Just download..." etc. etc.

      You get the idea.

      --
      "...they may harpoon us, but they ain't gonna pick us up on no radar screen!"
    5. Re:A bit biased by ichimunki · · Score: 3

      Windows users generally ARE clueless newbies. That's kinda M$'s market no?

      Given the sheer number of personal computers and smaller servers that exist in the world and run under Windows 9x/2k/NT/CE, I'd say that their target market is pretty much anyone and everyone who uses a computer for anything, ever. To try to equate "Windows users" with "clueless newbies" is nothing short of insulting to the computing population as a whole. I'm guessing I can count on one hand the number of computing professionals who, at some point, haven't been willingly involved in some way with MS products, including their foul GUI.

      I say we all take a solemn vow to simply avoid Micros~1 products as much as possible and to stop treating them as though they were actually important in the world of computing.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    6. Re:A bit biased by apg · · Score: 2

      Other services may send out advertising with your messages, but they don't go so far as to attach paragraphs of endorsement written in the first person, making it look as if the user wrote them -- much less not actually mention that they're doing it.

    7. Re:A bit biased by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 1

      really. I was fixing to get all fired up. But if it ASKS you, tough titty. Including an ad in the message may be annoying, but it's called good marketing. Don't like it? Gee, I guess you'd better say no and write the message yourself.
      ---

    8. Re:A bit biased by jgerman · · Score: 1
      I have no problem helping out those that need help with Linux, and I have from people with doctorates to students.

      The error in your attempt at biting sarcasm is that you assume that I'm using clueless newbies as a deragatory term, and assuming that I claim to have masterful skills. I can install and use linux of any flavor, but that's not the point. The point I was making is that M$ aims its products at people without much experience. Often this comes at the expense of security or whatever. As in this case they clearly are taking advantage of inexperienced users to promote their products.

      you might want to work on your language skills a bit. No where in my was I insulting anyone that uses M$ products. And in any case, it's not my fault that the majority of M$ users are those that don't know any better.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    9. Re:A bit biased by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      "...Windows users generally ARE clueless newbies. That's kinda M$'s market no?"

      M$'s market is everyone, everywhere. They just depend on clueless managers to force the smart people into using Windows at work, and then at home.

    10. Re:A bit biased by mikpos · · Score: 2

      Either you haven't bothered actually *reading* what he said or you don't think there's any difference between "Microsoft aims its products at" and "Microsoft products are used by". Either way, though, he's wrong. I'll grant you that much.

    11. Re:A bit biased by Chuck+Milam · · Score: 1

      ..the product specifically asks if you want to email ALL of your email contacts. Maybe a lot of people just didn't bother to read the message...

      Most of the truly non-technical users I've run across don't read pop-up messages at all. Rather, they seem to click wildly about, trying to get the annoying message boxes out of their way so they can get back to their E-Mail or web surfing.

      I can't think of how many times I've asked people who call for help: "What did the message in the little window that popped up say?"

      "I don't know, I just clicked on 'OK' until it went away," tends to be the inevitable answer.

      If users aren't reading error, warning or informational messages, I guess there's not much any of us can do about it--how do you protect a user from their own carelessness?

      So, even if Microsoft does ask "do you want to do this?", many users might end up shotgunning E-mail all over the place,and not even realize it.

    12. Re:A bit biased by jgerman · · Score: 1
      The ratio of people who have a clue that use windows to those who do is much, much smaller in the windows world than in the Linux world. Apparently you still seems to think I'm making the blanket statement that all windows users are clueless, not only did I not say that in the first place I explicity denied it in a follow up.

      And many of their enterprise products have a great deal of sophistication

      Yeah they do. They are so sophisticated that they have huge secutrity holes, or don't work properly, or constantly work against rather than with the user. I'm not going to get into an argument over why Windows software is bad. It's pointless. If someone wants to drive a Festiva instead of a Mustang so be it. Yeah the Mustang takes more gas to operate. But it's stronger, faster, and can do a lot more work.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    13. Re:A bit biased by belroth · · Score: 1
      really. I was fixing to get all fired up. But if it ASKS you, tough titty. Including an ad in the message may be annoying, but it's called good marketing. Don't like it? Gee, I guess you'd better say no and write the message yourself.

      If it doesn't TELL YOU what it's going to do you won't know to send your own message will you?
      ----

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    14. Re:A bit biased by calculi · · Score: 1

      "The ratio of people who have a clue that use windows to those who do is much, much smaller in the windows world than in the Linux world." This is because Linux is so bloody user-unfriendly. "They are so sophisticated that they have huge secutrity holes, or don't work properly, or constantly work against rather than with the user." Yet another clearly biased blanket statement with little factual basis.

    15. Re:A bit biased by TheViffer · · Score: 1
      This is because Linux is so bloody user-unfriendly.

      Only to the clueless is it user-unfriendly. I find the lack of any decent command line to be very unfriendly and process control in Windows to be a total kludge.

      "They are so sophisticated that they have huge secutrity holes, or don't work properly, or constantly work against rather than with the user."Yet another clearly biased blanket statement with little factual basis.

      Not sure .. but last time I checked McAfee Virus Shield is a something that has never been ported to UNIX. I also can not remember the last time "mail" has ever had a macro attack.

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    16. Re:A bit biased by jgerman · · Score: 1

      The quality user-friendly is a function of user intelligence and skill. And as far as little factual basis go check your facts. Linux is more secure, and does not crash.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    17. Re:A bit biased by Synchis · · Score: 1

      the product specifically asks if you want to email ALL of your email contacts. Maybe a lot of people just didn't bother to read the message

      Heres an interesting point for you...

      An anonymous company's system administrator decided to do a test on the network to find out how many people actually read error messeges and such. He created a program that ran on login that presented a dialog box with the sentence "Would you like to format your hard drive?". The program logges all responces to this question, and 90% of the employees clicked yes absent mindedly, without even reading it. He promptly scheduled some basic computer training courses for the entire company. :)

      My point? Sometimes people just don't care what the messege says... they just want to get it off there screen. And because M$ is so notorious for there over-used confirmation dialogs already, why would the average person pay attention to another one? In fact, I admit that even I clear messege boxes sometimes without even reading them.

      Synchis
      The worlds most popular, famous, and loved super hero...
      ...
      ...
      ...

      --
      Thomas A. Knight
      Author of The Time Weaver
    18. Re:A bit biased by thedude60 · · Score: 1

      If you've ever watched NBC, you've used Microsoft Products.

      If you've ever bought a GE product, you've used Microsoft Products.

      Most people are clueless about the world of bizness. Hey, most companies will merge or enter into a working agreement or arrangement with their bitterest rival, competitor, enemy, etc. if there's a way to make money. There are actually companies out there who've never developed anything of their own, but have been smart enough to buy up stuff that's good. That's not only in computer arena, but in everything.

      How do you expect GE, IBM, Proctor and Gamble, etc. got so big. It's the acquisitions, stupid.

      I'm ready for the slings and arrows. Fire away!!!

    19. Re:A bit biased by B.D.Mills · · Score: 3

      I agree completely.

      It's pretty clear how completely distorted the thinking of these Microsoft marketing people is. From the article, a representative of Microsoft's customer support department is quoted as saying: "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer." (Emphasis is mine.)

      It's pretty clear that Microsoft is intending to put words into the mouths of their users with statements like that.

      The usual definition of "spam" I employ is "unwanted and unsolicited commercial or bulk e-mail". This alleged Microsoft product meets both of these definitions.

      One problem with anti-spam laws is the way some anti-spam laws are worded. It would be the users that would be prosecuted and not Microsoft. But the good news is Microsoft could be prosecuted for making and trafficking a product that sends unsolicited commercial e-mail. It is clearly a trojan feature in their product.

      I feel that Microsoft should get advice from their lawyers on anti-spam laws, other laws relating to unauthorised access to computer equipment and e-mail fraud before releasing this product. If they don't, they could be in for an interesting time in the courts later.

      ---

      Disclaimer: IANAL. IDNLITUSA. (I am not a lawyer. I do not live in the U.S.A.)

      --

      --

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
    20. Re:A bit biased by mpe · · Score: 2

      Other services may send out advertising with your messages, but they don't go so far as to attach paragraphs of endorsement written in the first person, making it look as if the user wrote them -- much less not actually mention that they're doing it

      I'm sure virus writers are already working out how to make use of this new "feature", especially if the text can be changed.

    21. Re:A bit biased by grahamm · · Score: 1

      Though isn't the command line compiler still VC++? Computer language utilities is where Microsoft started, and where have traditionally been quite good. Back in the CP/M80 days wasn't the best Z80 macro-assembler the Microsoft one?

    22. Re:A bit biased by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      a good point. It should show you a preview.
      ---

  13. Wants you to try MSN Explorer? by MythoBeast · · Score: 2

    Ok, so MS assumes that anyone who changes their Email addy wants all of their friends to try MSN Explorer, right?

    Sure, that makes sense to me. I think I'll assume that anyone who visits my web site wants all of their friends to visit my website. Lesse, where did I put that virus kit...

    Mythological Beast

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  14. Sounds like "ILOVEYOU" put to 'consumer' use... by torpor · · Score: 2

    Sounds to me like MS has put the techniques used by the ILOVEYOU virus to use in 'protecting consumers' from having bad (read: non-MS controlled) email services...

    Hmm... freaky. What I want to know, is *how* did they do this, technically? Can other spammers use this same technique as well, or is it a Microsoft-only hidden technique? Because if it is, thats monopolistic.

    Everyone should be able to use all the MS Outlook users out there to send spam, you know... not just Microsoft!

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Sounds like "ILOVEYOU" put to 'consumer' use... by jon_c · · Score: 1

      disclaimer: i think your a troll, but I'll respond anyway.


      Sounds to me like MS has put the techniques used by the ILOVEYOU virus to use in 'protecting consumers' from having bad (read: non-MS controlled) email services...


      First of ILOVEYOU was technicaly Worm, not a virus, It used Outlooks Macro support to *AUTOMATICALY* email everyone in your address book. Secondly, this "feature" of Microsoft's new software doesn't proprogate. the trail ends with the email being sent. definatly NOT a virus, or a worm.


      Hmm... freaky. What I want to know, is *how* did they do this, technically? Can other spammers use this same technique as well, or is it a Microsoft-only hidden technique? Because if it is, thats monopolistic


      Um.. read in the outlook address book and send mail to all of them with a letter regarding the change of email address. Nothing hidden about it, it's standard MAPI API's. If you had a clue you could write a VB program to do with in about 60 seconds.

      -Jon

      --
      this is my sig.
    2. Re:Sounds like "ILOVEYOU" put to 'consumer' use... by torpor · · Score: 2

      Ok, didn't realize i was trolling, and posted before i finished reading the article... sorry to waste your time, mr. BFS.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  15. WOW by bungalow · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is abusing its power to extend its reach. Users be damned.

    This is new and different?

  16. On WHOSE behalf? by eth1 · · Score: 1
    "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer."

    I don't know about everyone else (and IANAL), but this REEKS of a class-action suit. I don't use the program, but if I did, I certaintly wouldn't give them the right to do anything 'on my behalf'. Unless, of course, it's buried somewhere in the EULA... Better watch that bank account, too.

    1. Re:On WHOSE behalf? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      you really should read the articles before you post instead of trying to be a mindless MS basher. You don't have to give them the right to send the email, it asks you 3, THREE times if you want to send the email, it even shows you what it's going to look like. If you don't want to send the email then you do something like click "no" instead of "yes"...

    2. Re:On WHOSE behalf? by danderson · · Score: 1

      it asks you 3, THREE times if you want to send the email

      Not according to the article I read. It asks you if you want to import your contacts from outlook. (first question) If you say yes it asks you if you want to send all of your contacts an email letting them know of your new email address. (second question) If you say yes it shows you the email and asks you ONCE if you want to send it. (third question) Sure it wants a response three times, but only the last is to verify the sending of the email.

      --
      This is supposed to be great art. So why does it look like a bunch of decapitated naked people? -- Calvin
    3. Re:On WHOSE behalf? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      That's still 3 questions dealing with the sending of Email, it's not like it does it by default.

  17. It's their own fault by AndrewSchaefer · · Score: 1

    People always assume that the little boxes with next don't mean anything, just keep clicking next. They're stupid for not reading what they are doing. It isn't right that they can't modify the message, or that it pimps Microsoft's apps. For some people, it's great to be able to notify others instantly, they probably don't know how to check 2 mail accounts. They aren't uber-geeks, just casual users who are playing with the all-in-one apps that M$ is putting together. It really is nice for people who are just getting started. Yes, it is spam, because Microsoft forced commercialization into it.

  18. Viruses by semaj · · Score: 1

    Well, it's certainly going to write it easier for the macro virus programmers anyway.

    Just call:

    sendspamtoeveryoneinaddressbook();

    And you're well on the way!


    -

    --
    Meep meep
  19. Corporate Users by akey · · Score: 1

    This seems like a phenomenally bad idea -- just think what happens if the secretary at a large company with thousands of employees (like the one where I work) inadvertantly allows the email to be sent.

    ---

    --

    ---
    "Go Metallica. Die RIAA." -- Linus Torvalds
  20. Is it just me... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2

    ...but I always thought that sending updates of e-mail addresses should be done by the person changing their account.

    And while you can 'opt out', wouldn't it be better if the system popped up one of those annoying MS dialogs asking if you want everyone to be informed?

    Or even better, allows you to pick and choose who you want informed, and allow you to enter your own text informing them, with the MS 'standard' being one of the options...

    Or does that make too much sense?

    NecroPuppy
    ---
    This Monday is up to three days... And still going strong...

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    1. Re:Is it just me... by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      it does popup one of those dialog boxes.. in fact it pops up 3 of them before it gets sent. Read the article next time.

    2. Re:Is it just me... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

      I meant when it would actually send the spam...

      The ones you mentioned only appear during installation, and given that most people accept the defaults when installing (because they are sheep), they won't know any better.

      NecroPuppy

      --
      I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
  21. This isn't SPAM!!!!! by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

    Everyone want's to receive JUNK MAIL on behalf of friends.

    --
    DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  22. Dear DOJ... by oh+shoot · · Score: 1
    The e-mail you received was an invitation from Microsoft Monopoly Expander, sent at the behest of a former user who changed their e-mail address and does not want any more spam. Thank you.

    Translation courtesy of BabelFish.

    --Jeff

  23. The statement doesn't hold up by Private+Essayist · · Score: 1
    Attempting to justify that these email are not spam, the letter from MS says:

    "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer," said Microsoft customer support in a letter that appeared to be an official statement.

    Let's see if their definition of non-spam holds up...

    "The e-mail you received was an invitation from GetRichQuick, Inc., sent on behalf of an existing spammer who wants you to try his product."

    Hmmm...nope, certainly not spam. Nosiree, nothing even remotely hamlike about it.

    PR 101: When caught doing something wrong, immediately claim that you weren't actually doing anything wrong. Then define what you were doing so that it matches what is wrong in every sense of the definition...
    ________________

    --
    ________________
    Private Essayist
  24. spam, M$, legality by arete · · Score: 1

    I thought there was actually a law against SPAM? Since this message section is sent without the consent of the user, it seems like you'd be able to establish that M$ actually sent it. Since it does not offer a way to avoid getting the same message in the future, didn't a law just pass making it illegal, litigatable spam?

    Class-action lawsuit, anyone?

    --
    Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    1. Re:spam, M$, legality by arete · · Score: 1

      I hadn't yet been able to see the post above, which is even more true: since they're assuming your endorsement without your consent, I'd say that's pretty bad and likely illegal, too.

      --
      Looking for freelance Actionscript (Flash/Flex) or ColdFusion work and/or freelance developers. Email me, put Slashdot
    2. Re:spam, M$, legality by Tommi+Morre · · Score: 1
      To my knowledge (IANAL, and this is just off the top of my head), any anti-Spam laws target the sender only -- since the sender is actually just a customer, legally Micro$oft would be in the clear.

      I have some, small, forlorn hope that maybe that's the real reason they're doing this -- just to prove they can get around a law that attempts to regulate behavior on the Internet. Maybe there are a few drones at M$ with some scraps of hacker spirit left, cruely misapplied to this hideous undertaking. Can you hear me? It's not to late! But you have to run now while there's still something left to save!

      Hail Eris!

  25. Polar opposites... by mr.ska · · Score: 3
    M$: 90+% of the home operating system market.
    Apple: has some home operating system market.

    M$: monopolizes with its bosom buddy Intel. Boring hardware.
    Apple: can't monopolize to save its life. Funky, powerful hardware.

    M$: spams their users.
    Apple: sues anyone trying to tell their users about new Apple stuff.

    Sigh. It's stuff like this that makes me want to load up QNX and just hide in my basement...

    --

    Mr. Ska

    1. Re:Polar opposites... by Bongo · · Score: 1

      Linux relies on MacOS in order to boot

      No, I don't think it does. Maybe you're referring to BootX, which is a MacOS app, but it's not the only way. Open Firmware can be set to boot linux by itself, allowing you to wipe away all traces of MacOS off your disk, (at least on an old 8500 - I haven't personally done it on a new cube).

  26. This is Not News by naught · · Score: 1

    What I'm hearing from the preliminaries is that no one is suprised, and I know I'm certainly not. We all knew that something like this was a possibility, and when the technology was ubiquitous enough, it would be exercised by the Microsoft Marketing Machine (Bob).

    Not only do I not get why people are still using this, but why it's even being reported as news. Everyone is collectively smacking their heads and going 'Duh!' on this one. Just wait until they start redirecting IE to the Microsoft Propaganda Page every hour on the hour (for MSN users, of course!).

    C'Mon folks. Real news please.

    --
    -- build a man a fire and he'll be warm all day. set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
  27. Mellissa Virus? by Slashdolt · · Score: 1

    No, no. That's right, the Mellissa virus wasn't this destructive. It only sent out emails to some of the people in your address list.

  28. Personally... by Chaos+Monkey · · Score: 1

    If I received that e-mail from one of my friends, I'd make a special trip over to their house and kick 'em squa in the balls simply based on the principle of the matter (they should know better than to use a crappy product like Outlook!)

    'Nuff said.

    --
    - I'm making a page dedicated to procrastinators! I'll let you know when I get started.
  29. Microsoft is not forcing this on you by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

    First teh program asksk if you wna to import your address book. then it ASKS if you want to send a message to everyone in your address book tell them of your new address. then it even SHOWS you the message that will be send "spam" and all. you actually have to click the SEND button to send this message. Ther user of the software knows perfectly well whats going to happen, how can you say they don't know they are doing it? Microsoft isn't spamming anyone, they just stuck a little ad at the bottom of an email that you have a CHOICE to send or not.

    1. Re:Microsoft is not forcing this on you by gunner800 · · Score: 1
      Well, it's still sort of spam, but it's from the users rather than from Microsoft. What MS did is really damned tacky, and it skirts the edge of spamminess, but if the users are shown the whole message before sending...

      Now, the fun will be if the people you send to can automatically resend your announcement to everyone in their address book...


      My mom is not a Karma whore!

    2. Re:Microsoft is not forcing this on you by irksome · · Score: 1

      You've posted that at least 5 times already. Ever think that maybe everyone else is sick of seeing the same exact thing over and over? You're as bad as the Natalie Portman/Hot Grits/Penis Bird trolls, and as much of a microsoft toadie as Gerald Holmes Moderators, kindly knock some sense into this person

      -

  30. Hotmail doesn't recognize it by Wind_Walker · · Score: 2

    These messages obviously are not spam. In the article, it clearly states that Hotmail, a completely free and useful service who protects your password and e-mail fervently, refuses to mark this as spam! Since Hotmail is the best web-based client around for free e-mail addresses, I would think that it would have the best filtering programs to weed out unwanted e-mails from unsolicited sources. Since the infalable Hotmail does not mark this as spam, saying "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer..." then clearly this was meant to be a beneficial and desired e-mail. Naysayers, begone! Hotmail would never lie to you!
    ------

  31. yeah, real personal by leko · · Score: 2

    "I recently began using a new product from Microsoft called MSN Explorer. With MSN Explorer, you can send and receive e-mail, exchange instant messages with me and the millions of other people who use MSN Explorer, browse the Web and much more. MSN Explorer even offers an exciting new look for using the Web and makes it easy to find and play music online. Want to try it out? It's FREE! Just click on the link below and follow the download instructions.

    This reads like spam to me. I wonder how many people are actually fooled to thinking that this was really a letter from a friend raving about this new product.

    What gets me is that this seems so low for microsft to stoop. I mean, underhanded buisness maneuvers are at least somthing that requires brains... spam is something that dumbasses trying to make a buck off the web resort too.

  32. Lock-in by Shotgun · · Score: 3

    Just another example of lock-in techniques from the monopolist. I get an offer for a free month of MSN, so I say, "Heh, it's free. Let's see why everyone trashes MSN so much." I install it, then everyone get a notice to change how they reach me.

    Once I discover why everyone has been dissing the service, I have to either manually inform everyone that the previous message was bogus spam generated by MS crapware, that I was only testing out their service to see how bad it was, that it was so bad that I'll never use it again and that they should send emails to my real address, or I keep the service since that is how everyone knows how to reach me.

    It's a testament to my cynicism that I believe most people would opt for the second choice.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:Lock-in by TheReverand · · Score: 1
      Either you're above statement is a lie, or you are a clueless newbie, since it ASKS YOU before it sends the message. Are you so blind as to idly click through anything that pops up on your screen? I swear some of you people, in your ever mounting quest to become 1 with slashbot collective. It really disgusts me. Sometimes I would rather look at http://goatse.cx then read these inane posts.

    2. Re:Lock-in by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      Are you so blind as to idly click through anything that pops up on your screen?

      Have you ever sat down and worked with a clueless newbie? My wife's neice just started college locally, and she wanted me to put a network card in her computer and her roomates (the college wanted $150 to do it.) They brought me their computers and network cards. I open the roomate's box, and there is a NIC staring at me. Booted it up, and there is an error message saying that the network card needed to be configured. The roomate didn't think she had a network card, even though the error message that she had been clicking on for months was telling her that it needed to be configured. So while I may read a message before clicking OK, most cluebies will not.

      For me, next time I will check for the presence of a NIC when a cluebie brings me a computer to install a NIC. Don't know why I let this one catch me off guard.

      Sometimes I would rather look at http://goatse.cx then read these inane posts.

      So don't. Bye.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    3. Re:Lock-in by SCHiZNiT · · Score: 1

      [i]Sometimes I would rather look at http://goatse.cx then read these inane posts.[/i] Hey, finally the complete collection is available at http://www.stileproject.com/assman.html ! I didn't bother to click on the thumbnails though, I'd rather read these inane posts more...

  33. addy = address by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 1

    What is an 'addy'? Not all here are born knowing English! Be more open for acceptance of Open-Source!
    ok!

    -Ashram


    addy = address

    I am sprinkling my posts with hip, with it slang, so that I will appear mad cool, and have my choice of Slashdot chicks.

    props to Taco!

  34. I don't notice anything different... by lwagner · · Score: 5

    I don't know what you guys are talking about...Mine seems to work fine...


    ---

    "I recently began using a new product from Microsoft called MSN Explorer. With MSN Explorer, you can send and receive e-mail, exchange instant messages with me and the millions of other people who use MSN Explorer, browse the Web and much more. MSN Explorer even offers an exciting new look for using the Web and makes it easy to find and play music online. Want to try it out? It's FREE! Just click on the link below and follow the download instructions."



    --
    Spindletop Blackbird, the GNU/Linux Cube.
  35. I'm just tired of this crap... by rocketpilot · · Score: 1
    which is why I'm going to Linux this weekend. Already have the Mandrake 7.1 disks made and have got an I-Opener booting Linux to use as a remote Xterm. The only stumbling block I'll have is getting TSM (Top Secret Messenger) running with the Win32 ICQ under WINE. Anyone? Anyone?

    * sigh *

    Remember when people were polite on the net because they'd have several hundred magazine subscriptions to cancel if they didn't? Damn AOL!

  36. Freedom to Innovate! by dpilot · · Score: 2

    It's just that simple. It appears that Microsoft construes the defeat of fast-track to be a victory, and an endorsement of their business techniques.

    Look for more of this type of conduct.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  37. Wait just a sec... by yawhcihw · · Score: 1

    You mean some people actually WANT to tell others that their email address has changed? Changing addresses without telling anyone has significantly reduced the number of messages I get per day.

  38. Wesayso by msaulters · · Score: 1
    "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer."
    OK, so first, MS tried to dictate to the government who they can and can't sue. Now the corporation of the northern hemisphere sees fit to put words in our mouths. I've got news for them... I DO NOT want anyone to try MSN Explorer, therefore it is the absolute pinnacle of presumption to send an e-mail on behalf of me saying the opposite. Obviously, those who are complaining are of the same opinion. Of course, never has the court of Emperor Gates bowed to public opinion.
    --
    These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
  39. virus by romco · · Score: 1

    2 things really bother me

    "I am writing to let you know that I have a new e-mail address: "(new e-mail)."

    "users could not edit the wording."

    So it is spamming , and not allowing you to change
    change the wording to state that it is comming from Micros~1 and not you.

    I'd almost call it a virus.

    --
    AdFuel
  40. Um... by Fervent · · Score: 5
    To Microsoft's credit, you have to press a couple of buttons to "accidentally" send this spam (read: you are an idiot). The program even tells you the subject line of the spam right before you ok to send it ("Come try Explorer Preview" or something like that).

    IMO, if you go through a few clicks and see something as blatant as that, you shouldn't click "OK" and complain about it afterward.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    1. Re:Um... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Of course you'd have to actually try to send it, and it doesn't send the e-mails automatically... but what do you expect? The Slashdot crew would *NEVER* pass up a chance to bash Microsoft...

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    2. Re:Um... by jmoloug1 · · Score: 1

      But it's not the people who clicked OK that are complaining. It's all the people who are getting spammed that are pissed. If MS is offering what appears to be a neat feature of change-of-address notification to actually target marketing at people without the sender's knowledge, doesn't this violate some law? Like maybe theft of computer services?

    3. Re:Um... by Fervent · · Score: 2
      If MS is offering what appears to be a neat feature of change-of-address notification to actually target marketing at people without the sender's knowledge, doesn't this violate some law? Like maybe theft of computer services?

      None that I know of. Again, it would be different if they made no mention of their intentions during the "change of address" process. But the subject line should pretty clearly tip you off that "Hey, I'm about to send some advertisements to people".

      Generally, I stay away from any services or web sites that ask for friends' email addresses. I know that they will simply spam them under my name (think Pointcast a few years back) and I'll only succeed in making them extremely angry.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    4. Re:Um... by remande · · Score: 2

      That's a bit like shipping everybody a machine gun, delivered with a belt of ammo already loaded in the gun loaded, and saying that everything is alright because they shipped it with the safety on?

      --

      --The basis of all love is respect

  41. Where to dou want to go today? by jbarnett · · Score: 5


    This is an automatic message from the new Windows Messaging software information you that _Bob Sagertion_ has change his desktop wall paper quickly and easily with only 2 clicks of the mouse. That sure is easy, please try using Microsoft Windows 98 with imbedded Windows Messaging Software to allow YOU to take advantage of this great new fearture.

    This email would also like to information you that _Bob Sagertion_ has not only moved his mouse, but has also used 2 clicks in the last _12_ seconds. How do you know so much information about _Bob Sagertion_ ? With the new Microsoft Mouse Monitor Util imbeded with Microsoft's own Windows Messaging. If you would like these great feartures YOU TO can get Windows Messaging for the low price of $19.95.

    The next time _Bob Sagertion_ has made any changes or has interacted with a peice of Microsoft's Windows Messaging software, you will receive notice of this. If you would like YOUR freind to take notice of any IMPORTANT things you do with your computer, like change email address, store your persoal private journal or even make a mouse click, then please check out Microsoft's Windows Message software for the low price of $19.95

    --

    Also on a side note, Microsoft is suing Norton Anti-virus software for detecting and delete any messages Windows Messager is sending out. Due to the lack of AI in Norton's software, it can't tell the differant between this GREAT NEW SOFTWARE and the hoard of outlook worms/virii out there.

    On a related topic, Mr. Norton knew caps has been shattered by an unknown person(s).

    Have a nice day,
    Windows Messaging software and Paper clip harry


    --

    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
  42. The thing that angers me most about this is... by meldroc · · Score: 1

    It is bad enough that Microsoft is sending unsolicited commercial email. Yes, boys and girls, this is spam - unsolicited because neither the user or the people in his Outlook address book explicitly asked for it - the user just sent a change of address request, and it is commercial it nature.

    Worse, Microsoft makes a statement in the email in the user's name ("I am using MSN and would like for you to try it!") without his permission. This is incredibly arrogant and possibly illegal. If Microsoft doesn't remove this "feature" it will have another lawsuit added to it's stack of legal troubles.

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
    1. Re:The thing that angers me most about this is... by jbarnett · · Score: 1


      Isn't it illegal to impersonate someone (other than your self)?


      --

      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
    2. Re:The thing that angers me most about this is... by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      Yes, boys and girls, this is spam - unsolicited because neither the user or the people in his Outlook address book explicitly asked for it - the user just sent a change of address request, and it is commercial it nature.

      I disagree. The program offers the ability to send the email and (if I read the article correctly) shows you what the content will be before you send it. True, you cannot change the content.

      But compare this to the adverts at the bottom of every juno.com or hotmail or yahoo email message. They advertise a service, do not allow you to change the nature of that advertisement, and don't even offer you the ability to not send them.

      By your definition, every piece of mail I recieve from a user of one of these services is spam.

    3. Re:The thing that angers me most about this is... by restless_ne'erdowell · · Score: 1

      I think there's a big difference between this and the advertisements on the free web-based e-mail services in terms of the quantity and type of content.

      On e-mails from users of yahoo, hotbot, etc. the service adds one or two lines at the very end of the user's message -- something along the lines of "Hotbot--search smarter" and a URL. It's more like a sig, and it's pretty unobtrusive.

      With this MSN Explorer, there's several lines of content that comprise almost all of the message. The user isn't even allowed to add their own content. Granted, it doesn't add this to every message the user sends (hopefully!), but this address change message has more advertisement content than personal content. That sounds like spam to me.

      I couldn't tell from the article whether or not the user saw the message before it was sent. The article says the setup program creates the e-mail, and sends it out if the user clicks "send", but not whether there's a preview of the e-mail. Or whether there's an easy way to back out once you've gotten that far.

      Regardless, it just seems kind-of slimey to include a paragraph of gushing about the beauty of the Microsoft Network written in the first person. It sounds like those forwarded chain letters -- "this is so great I had to tell you about it..."

  43. re: Outlook syncs to my mobile phone.... by Rozzin · · Score: 1

    Outlook syncs to my mobile phone, point me to another program that does that, and I'll use it.

    Hm.
    Point me to some specs, and I'll write you one:)

    --
    -rozzin.
  44. Actually... It could be worse by msaulters · · Score: 1

    It could grab all e-mail addresses from any incoming/outgoing messages in all your folders. Which is worse? Pissing off EVERYBODY or just those close enough to be in your address book?

    --
    These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
  45. it's not as evil as it looks... by ledbetter · · Score: 1

    As much as I hate to say it...

    First, the program does ASK you if it's ok to send messages to your contacts informing them of your address change. You actually have to press a button to get it to send the notifications. So is it really spam?

    Spam is really unsolicited e-mail that provides no service whatsoever, and just bugs you. These messages actually inform you of one of your contact's new e-mail address. It's worthwile information.

    Second, If they are providing this feature, why not let them include a little advertisement? People put up with the little ad at the bottom of every single hotmail message without complaining too much.

    They have to make money somehow, since no one actually pays for their software :)

    1. Re:it's not as evil as it looks... by elmegil · · Score: 1
      First, the program does ASK you if it's ok to send messages to your contacts informing them of your address change. You actually have to press a button to get it to send the notifications. So is it really spam?

      Yep it is.

      It doesn't ask you if you want to send a TESTAMONIAL to all your friends.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  46. Help or hurt? by black · · Score: 1

    So this brings us to a real question: What can Microsoft do before the hoi polloi will even start to look at an alternative OS?
    Obviously, a lot of this depends on the alternatives themselves. But let's say, for the sake of arguement, an OS (let's just call it Z) develops via open source and provides all the functionality that MS provides. I know I would switch in a heartbeat, but most non techies wouldn't bother. So what does Microsoft have to do to piss those people off so that they will begin to see alternatives?
    Or do some of those people actually like this stuff?

  47. MicroSnot isn't the only one... by LordStrange · · Score: 3
    I think most mega-dialup ISPs are doing this sort of thing. I know Sprint/Earthlink does it. They do ask if you want to notify those in your address book, but they fail to mention the marketing crap that they attach.

    It is distasteful, but it's not a Microsoft only thing.

    --

    License: By reading this you are agreeing that you agree with me.

    1. Re:MicroSnot isn't the only one... by mr.ska · · Score: 3
      It is distasteful, but it's not a Microsoft only thing.

      ...but it is a distasteful Microsoft thing. So we're allowed to whine, hiss, and spit. Aren't we?

      License: By reading this you are agreeing that you agree with me.

      Yes, I agree that I agree that that sentence is your licence.

      --

      Mr. Ska

    2. Re:MicroSnot isn't the only one... by LordStrange · · Score: 1
      ...but it is a distasteful Microsoft thing. So we're allowed to whine, hiss, and spit. Aren't we?

      Hell yes you are! But it's more fun to broaden the whine to include all marketing weasels.

      --

      License: By reading this you are agreeing that you agree with me.

  48. New virus by Mr+Krinkle · · Score: 1

    In the news today Mcaffee warned users of a new email virus. It appears that someone going by the name of Bill Gates has written or coauthored a program which emails everyone in a users address book and then convinces them that this is good and then emails everyone in their address book. Mcaffee claims they will have a fix shortly and in the mean time they recomend everyone stay away from anything with the words microsoft in it.

    --
    I am 31337 or something.
  49. New feature corrects misstatements about Microsoft by bungalow · · Score: 1

    Microsofts newest feature corrects inadvertently mistyped anti-microsoft comments.

    I typed in the following message:

    "Microsoft is a monopolist whose policies and procedures are written to one purpose: Maintain power and make money, users be damned."

    I addressed it to my friends, family, and casual business associates and hit the "send" button.

    The message that they recieved was thus:

    "I love Microsoft. I love Bill Gates. Microsoft is my friend. Let's all use MSN and drink milk and eat warm toasty cookies.

    The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer."

  50. Alternative message - by lwagner · · Score: 1

    "I recently began using a new product from Microsoft called MSN Explorer."

    "With MSN Explorer, you can send and receive spam, exchange erotic messages with me and the millions of other teenagers who use MSN Explorer, browse for pornography and much more. MSN Explorer even offers an exciting new proprietary interface for using the Web and makes it 'easy' to preview and license music online. Want to try it out? It's FREE - just click on the link below, sign the waiver, and fill out several screens of detailed information."



    --
    Spindletop Blackbird, the GNU/Linux Cube.
  51. Unsolicited E-mail by EXTomar · · Score: 2

    Some people are overracting on this. The problem here isn't necessarily that people are unknowingly spamming people with e-mail(although it will happen because people often don't read what they click too). Its the fact that Microsoft has now "innovated" there way into Unsolicited E-mail. It would have been just as bad if Bill Gates they bought one of those CD sets full of e-mail and started to spam people to try their software.

  52. This is part of their new strategy... by Wellspring · · Score: 4

    You think this is bad, you should see what else they have on the way:

    Internet Explorer: Automatically posts to slashdot announcing that you are now using Internet Explorer and that we will all be assimilated.

    MS Word: Prints a letter and envelope, complete with Estamps, to everyone in your address book, then uses Orbital Mind Control Lasers to make you sign, seal and send them. MS charges the estamps to your credit card.

    MS Money: An 'affiliate' program. They send spam announcing that you use MS Money, then offer five bucks to people who switch, also. The money comes from your bank account. (After all, they didn't get this rich writing big checks. Buy 'em out, boys!)

    1. Re:This is part of their new strategy... by Ty · · Score: 1
      (After all, they didn't get this rich writing big checks. Buy 'em out, boys!)

      Hehe. So subtle.... :)

  53. How about the BSD Chick? by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 1

    Though I foget her name, but any gal that know her way around BSD and goes to a BSD con is worth knowing in my book.

  54. Spamvertising by Wansu · · Score: 1


    Yessir. That's what I've seen this practice referred to as.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  55. Encouraging "dumbing down." by rhizome · · Score: 1

    The article says that there is a checkbox during installation that governs this behavior. Aside from the "Opt-in/Opt-out" argument, do we really want to make excuses for people not to pay attention to what they're allowing the computer to do on their behalf? Next, users who press the "return" key are asked if they would like to notify the people in their address book of a change in e-mail.

    --
    When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  56. Hey, maybe MS will patent spam! ;-) by kd5biv · · Score: 1

    We can only hope .. sure would cut down on unsolicited email if every spammer had to pay patent royalties to Microsoft ..

    And the best part is, it would be powered by Microsoft's legal department. If the PTO is going to grant stupid patents, the least they can do is make the spammers live under the constant threat of cease-and-desist orders from the Evil Empire.

    --


    73 de N5VB (ex-KD5BIV) AR SK
  57. I'm really going to miss Microsoft... by Cally · · Score: 1

    such wonderful entertainment value

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  58. Hey, I bet the DMCA could help! by Lux · · Score: 1

    There has to be something in the DMCA that would allow M$ to be sued for this. =)

  59. And in response to previous posters.. by kd5biv · · Score: 1
    I guess we can add "Spamming" as another "Business" where Microsoft can use its monopoly status to its advantage.
    I have to say previous postings are right .. this isn't really Microsoft spamming, it's Microsoft setting their apps up so the unwary and clueless can very easily spam all their friends by accident with a Microsoft ad. Although you could make the very strong case that this is simply using the lusers as an innovative and clever new form of spam vector ..

    --


    73 de N5VB (ex-KD5BIV) AR SK
  60. MS ... spammer or spammee? by DoctorZed · · Score: 1

    So how do I add all the MS employees to my Outlook Address Book? Maybe the Justice Department, the White House, Congress....

  61. Netscape by vbrtrmn · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's about as annoying as the:
    Today's Features...at Netscape.com

    I am required to download, when I open Netscape messenger.

    Every once in awhile, I think to myself .. why don't I switch to Outlook. Strangly enough everytime I start to think that, I come over to SlashDot in time to read about another Crappy feature or Macro Virus.

    --
    you are not what you own

    --
    it's a sig, wtf?
  62. Hmmm - It seems the Linux Community cannot read by gamorck · · Score: 1

    Its time to take some remedial reading courses people. From the comments I have read it appears that a number of so called Linux gurus have been a victim of this so-called "spam" scheme.

    Its hard to believe you guys can use an OS like Linux (which involves alot of knowledge and know how) and cant seem to find the intellectual strength within your feeble FSF corrupted minds to read a messagebox placed upon your screen by MSN Explorer during installation. As you can imagine - this message box asks whether or not you want to inform your buddies of your new email address.

    If you dont want to send the email - CLICK NO FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! Stop whining about it and trying to make a federal case out of it! If all of you anti-capitalists are using Linux anyway - how in the hell do you people even know what it is you are talking about in the first place?

    The answer to that question is that you dont know what you are talking about - so shut the hell up.

    And finally I would just like to say f*ck you to Commander Taco. I have never in my life spoken to or read the writings of somebody who just obviously doesn't have the slightest clue when it comes to the subject of reality other than Commander Taco.

    Mr. Taco - get your hand out of your pants and start acting your age. Its time to get with it - or just get out.

    Oh yeah - my email addy is darkgamorck@home for all you Slashdotters who feel the need to mailbomb me. Just be aware - I will ENJOY every second of it.

    --
    I love idealists not because I am one, but because they make life bearable for pragmatists such as myself.
    1. Re:Hmmm - It seems the Linux Community cannot read by dingbat_hp · · Score: 1

      Stop whining about it

      So you really think that this is a good idea ?

      I doubt I'll ever be caught by it. Rather than worrying about the dialog, I favour a pre-emptive strike on all M$oft email (and DNS) products. OTOH, my Mother uses M$oft products and so do half of my neighbours. Not everyone has your incredible powers of guruship, and any vendor has a responsibility (which is recognised in law) to make products that are usable by and non-harmful to a reasonable person, not just the divine gamorck.

    2. Re:Hmmm - It seems the Linux Community cannot read by Malcontent · · Score: 1
      "If you dont want to send the email - CLICK NO FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!"

      Apparenty you are another one of those stupid windows users. Listen up let me try to explain this to you.
      I would never use MSN and therefore this has nothing to do with me actually clicking anything. I on the other hand may have stupid frinds like you who do not understand the internet and need dumbed down services like MSN. I do not under any circumstances want to receive unsolicited advertisements for MSN (or any other microsoft product) in my mailbox.

      repeat after me ok? SPAM is unsolited advertising.
      You got it?

      A Dick and a Bush .. You know somebody's gonna get screwed.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    3. Re:Hmmm - It seems the Linux Community cannot read by Hanno · · Score: 3

      I have clicked "no" on Microsoft's web site when I signed up for a minor download.

      Ever since then, I receive constant updates from Microsoft's "Freedom to Innovate Network".

      Unsubscribing did not help. Complaining to my local customer support of Microsoft Germany did not help (Several German MS employees asked "What is the Freedom to Innovate Network? I never heard of that.") Complaining to the US customer support did not help. Complaining to their US internet provider did not help.

      Now don't tell me about "clicking no the for the love god" when it comes about a company that is too big to even care about me wanting their PR spin or not.

      ------------------

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
  63. Spam Microsoft by Technician · · Score: 1

    Anybody have a address book containing only the Microsoft developement team they want to post? If everyone got a copy and notified the entire developement team a few times, they might get the hint. Please someone post a list of Microsoft software engineers. I would love to tell each and every one I changed address on one E-mail account!

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  64. Just so long as... by ALG · · Score: 1

    ...MSN Explorer automatically puts an entry in Microsoft Money and sends an e-payment of $100 to all the people who you send this too for wasting their time, I think this is ok.

    ALG

  65. Great NEW MSN Virus!!!! by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 1

    This perfectly fits the definition of an e-mail virus. I subsrcibe to MSN and everybody in my address book gets an e-mail inviting them to subscribe. If one or more of them do subscribe then everybody in their address books gets an e-mail and so on and so on and so on ...

  66. Bill Gates by nigelb0 · · Score: 1

    Maybe we should all put Bill Gates in our address lists?

  67. M$ is not the spammer -- YOU ARE!!! by Stavr0 · · Score: 5
    No. This is much worse. By sending potentially hundreds of unsolicited commercial emails, you are violating your ISPs Terms of Service. When 5 or 10 of these posts trigger a spamcop report or other similar complaint, YAIT!

    • You get TOSsed from your ISP and you'll have to spend hours on the phone to convince said ISP that "honest! it wasn't my fault!"

    • You lose some friends who now think your a MS sellout, spammer or worse
      Your email address will end up ORBS, RBL and several other blacklists, which means your (brand new!) email address is now useless
      Several of you friends will succumb to the suggestion, try MSN explorer and fsck themselves up too; hating you twice as much.

    I nominate this one for the stupid crocky losing misfeature award of the year.
    ---

  68. Not so much spam as identity fraud. by bmongar · · Score: 1

    You agreed to send a change of e-mail message to everyone in your address book, so you did initiate the message and it really isn't spam because it is a relivant personal correspondance. It however fraud in my eyes when you attach the uneditable remainder of the message to the change of address in first person thus seeming like it came from you.

    So I don't think it is spam, but I beleive it is fraud.

    IANAL

    --
    As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
  69. Since the beginning of digital time, by JurriAlt137n · · Score: 1

    Micro$oft has been making money by bundling together other people's mistakes and calling it "development", "beta" or "Windows 95". Now their eyes have fallen on a whole new market: Viruses. How long will it be till the release of Micro$oft Antivirus: keep every spammer but us away?


    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  70. Potato Storage by Tommi+Morre · · Score: 1
    You can find more potatoes in the potato storage. If there aren't any there, try here.

  71. Amazing isn't it.... by carebear75 · · Score: 1

    Funny I can't seem to find mention of M$ in this article.... http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2632 102,00.html And where does it say when notifying your friends that you are changing your addy that you will now be also spouting M$ praises.

  72. Not just Micros~1's fault. by Mike1024 · · Score: 1
    Hey,

    I've had a look at the program. You have to to through several dialogues to send this e-mail. Sure, it does advertise Microsoft's service, but what do you expect? A lot of services do, this is no 'innovation'.

    The way I see it, the problem is not Microsoft's actions but the ignorant, lazy, apathetic attitude of users. When I change my e-mail address (practically never), I write personal e-mails. If you can't be bothered with making the effort, the result isn't going to be as nice.

    (Score: -2 (Disagreeing with collective slashdot view) )

    Michael

    ...another comment from Michael Tandy.

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  73. "I Love You" Microsoft Style by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 1
    Hmmm...
    • Sending an automatic message to everyone in the Outlook address book...
    • If recipients take them up on the offer, everyone in their address book gets the message.
    • Using Microsoft products has been known to cause data corruption.

      • This isn't spam, it a frickin' worm.


    --
    When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
  74. Hee hee by Vassily+Overveight · · Score: 2
    The best part of this article is the MS reps argument about why this isn't spam "The e-mail you received was an invitation from MSN Explorer, sent on behalf of an existing user who changed their e-mail address and wants you to try MSN Explorer."

    This reminds me of Microsoft's response when I pointed out a problem with one of their C++ libraries: "It isn't a bug. It's a limitation." That slogan was my .sig for years.

    --

    "If I have seen further than other men, it is by stepping on their glasses." - Michael Swaine

    1. Re:Hee hee by resistant · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of Microsoft's response when I pointed out a problem with one of their C++ libraries: "It isn't a bug. It's a limitation." That slogan was my .sig for years.

      "It isn't a bug. It's an exclusive Microsoft feature."

      This would make Windows 95/98/2000/Me/CE/NT what, a cockroach motel?

      Where did I put that rare earth magnet? ;']

      --
      A truly excellent pizza parlor is a delight unto the heavens. Treasure the sauce and the toppings!
  75. Two points... by drteknikal · · Score: 1

    First, this is beta software, and this "feature" may not survive to the production release, especially given the press it's getting them.

    Second, this is not done without the users knowledge and acceptance. It is the default behavior, but it can be disabled with a couple of clicks. Of course, the average user for whom this product is targeted will probably accept the defaults without question...

    --
    http://drteknikal.blogspot.com/
  76. Just a thought by Auckerman · · Score: 2
    Human: Ummm, I think my computer has a virus.

    MS Tech Support: Why do you think that?

    Human: It e-mailed everyone in my Outlook address book, telling them I had a new e-mail and to try MSN.

    MS Tech Support: Oh, that's not a virus, it's a feature.

    Human: It's a feature of the OS to auto e-mail your friends?

    MS Tech Support: That's correct.

    Human: So the programs like "The Love Bug" are a feature of Windows.

    MS Tech Support: No, they are virii.

    Human: But doesn't this "feature" make the OS more likely to spread virii?

    MS Tech Support: Virii spread is not a result of bad programming on MS's part, but because the user did something wrong.

    Human: Things like this don't happen on my Mac or Linux bo...

    MS Tech Support: *hangs up abruptly*

    So there we have it folks, when MS spams your friends, its a feature, when a virii does it, its the users fault.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:Just a thought by Mars+Saxman · · Score: 1

      "A virii" is incorrect, and sounds silly to boot.

      "Virus" is the singular.

      "Viruses" is the plural.

      Don't try to latinize the plural, as the original word had no plural. "Virus" and its plural, in the senses in which we use them, are English words that behave according to English rules of grammar.

      I'm sorry to be a grammar cop, but this mistake bugs the hell out of me, and your post is an unusually bad example. Aside from that, it was funny.

      -Mars

    2. Re:Just a thought by Auckerman · · Score: 1

      ....and the english rules of grammar say the plural of virus is virii

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
  77. Slashdot FUD by notasheep · · Score: 1

    Why is this news? What does MS being a monopoly have anything to do with spamming? BTW, the program *asks* people if they want to send the updates to the people in their address book...so not only is this not spam, it's a horrible story.

    --
    Your mind looks a little cramped. Why don't you stretch it a little?
  78. Kill, Kill, Kill all msn.com, hotmail.com address' by Locutus · · Score: 1
    There is a easy solution. After all why would anyone want to converse with someone using msn.com or hotmail.com services? They are Microsoft drones who want to live in Microsofts world and I say we should let them have it all to themselves. Filters are a wonder thing. IMHO.

    PS. My mom uses NetPliances' IOpener. :)

    Locutus

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  79. 10k GOD Apple was mopped by IBM/Intel/M$ by Alejo · · Score: 1
    Apple is WAY worst than M$ on monopolies.

    It looks like IBM's mainframe hardware registration. EVERYTHING is from Apple, or at least licensed.

    If they were like M$, they could even forbid using other OSs (ie. Linux) to run on their hardware.

    Repeat after me: "Apple sucks!".

    1. Re:10k GOD Apple was mopped by IBM/Intel/M$ by melchoir55 · · Score: 1

      Apple Sucks!

  80. Microsoft Chain letter scam by Geccoman · · Score: 1

    The next big thing from M$ will be a chain letter scam similar to this, but instead, they'll say:
    You have been chosen for the MSNExplorer beta challenge! Please install MSN and forward this e-mail to all your friends! If you do, Bill Gates will think about giving you $934,209,394,203 dollars each second that you are on MSN. Try it! I just got $398,209,209,408,109,390,409 in the mail yesterday! Bill is such a generous guy!
    Microsoft! Microsoft! Microsoft!

    This is utter bullcrap. I thought that MSN e-mail was supposed to be a service that you paid for. When I send a letter to a friend, the post office doesn't open it up and recommend to all of my recipeints that they never use FedEx or UPS. Free e-mail is a little different, like in the cases of hotmail and yahoo advertising themselves at the bottom of your messages. But MSN charges money, last time I checked.

    end rant

    --
    I'm on a chair.
  81. Is MS stealing open source code? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they based their program on the widely available "ILOVEYOU" virus.

    1. Re:Is MS stealing open source code? by fermi's+ghost · · Score: 1


      It means that Melissa and ILOVEYOU were beta tests.

  82. HotMail doesn't like it by sconeu · · Score: 1


    The same article says that HotMail doesn't like it and has asked MSN to stop it, too!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  83. Ah well by MaynardJ · · Score: 1

    Let's just hack it so MS gets indignant e-mail for everyone in your mailing list when you change your address. Or just not use MSN, but I suppose that's a given.

  84. Four Clicks Later by twitter · · Score: 2
    MS trains it's users to click buttons. Excell makes me click OK four fucking times to save a spreadsheet. 1; click save icon 2: You should use an older format for people that don't have this. OK 3; You might loose something here! OK. 4. I forgot what, but it's obtuse. Ahhhh! just save the thing! We all know how many buttons you have to press to say, change a DNS server. Then you have to reboot! MS interfaces have always been second rate, inconsistent and deceptive.

    I can imagine the same feeling of "just do it already" takes over here too. How many times do you have to click OK to do this? After digging deep enough to change that address, I can imagine the average user is already annoyed. Next they get a promissing note, "Wow, now I don't have to do this by hand." By the time they get to that subject line and don't see anyway to change it, and don't know that the message contains something that WAS NOT prommised... well, they push the button.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Four Clicks Later by Redeemed · · Score: 1

      Well, I've used Excel plenty of times, and last time I saved a document, I got a grand total of Zero message boxes telling me anything. It just saved. Unless I hadn't saved it before, then it gave me a dialog box so I could tell it where to save it. How pesky! Not sure what settings you're using, but clearly they're not default.

      I currently run Win2k. To change my DNS server, I have to press 3 buttons. One to get to TCP/IP properties, one to confirm the change, and one to close my LAN properties again. Then the DNS servers are changed, no reboot necessary. Same if I change my IP address. Careful using blanket statements, contrary to popular opinion, MS has improved Win2k greatly over the previous incarnations of Windows. I've been running Win2k at least half a year, and it hasn't crashed yet.

      If the feeling of "just do it already" takes over, too freaking bad! If you don't read a message and you hit a button when presented with an option, you're still responsible for the consequences. When's the last time you went into court after breaching a contract and said "But all that legalize, I didn't bother to read the contract before I signed it, why should I be bound to it?" If you want to mindlessly click buttons, go ahead, but if the computer then does something you don't want it to, it isn't anybody's fault but your own.

    2. Re:Four Clicks Later by twitter · · Score: 2
      I never said I clicked without reading. The point was that MS forces people to click so often that they'll punch anything. The only thing I won't read anymore are those 15 page EULA that have all the force of urine against a tide. Oh, I Agree and I Submit, Bill. Ahhh, ha ha ha ha ha! Nope, don't use that smelly stuff any more except at work where I'm forced to suffer. Setup NT 4.0 service pack 4,5 or 6, with office 97. I've never touched any of MS's impossible to find "default" settings, and so they torture me every day.

      My sympathy goes out to all of those people who have a single choice of OS when they buy their machine. I also feel for them as they get suckered into MSN, and spam all of their friends. Tricked again!

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  85. I bought what? by radpole · · Score: 1

    Next they will be ordering a case of Windows Me, a case of scotch with your credit card for all your freinds just because your a nice guy and all!

  86. The Choice by jjr · · Score: 2

    The problem is that microsoft did to things wrong. They worded thier ad to strong also they
    They did not give people the choice to change it if they wanted to.

  87. Wait, microsoft is testing an email beta? by eastMike · · Score: 1

    Okay, I forwarded the story to 50 of my friends, who are sure to send it on to their friends....when do I get my check?

    "It is well that war is so terrible, lest we grow too fond of it."

    --

    Time is fun when you're having flies.
    -Kermit the Frog
  88. From Moron To Spammer : A Good Thing From Redmond? by d.valued · · Score: 1
    No. This is much worse. By sending potentially hundreds of unsolicited commercial emails, you are violating your ISPs Terms of Service. When 5 or 10 of these posts trigger a spamcop report or other similar complaint, YAIT! Think about this for a second. Is it possible - just bear with me on this - that this could be a GOOD thing? I mean, the average Intel(da,da,da,dunk)igence of the new Internet user is sharply decreasing. (Just look at Slashdot.) But... if the person who is a total "fucking idiot" and knows naught of the Ways of the Net decides that to send everyone he has ever known in the span of time s/he has been online sending jokes and bulldrek offers etc. a piece of UCE, then we may achieve two, very good things:
    • Net congestion due to spam shall radically decrease.
    • Slashdot will be easier to load without a +3 filter in place. :)
    --
    I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
    Real life is underrated.
  89. so this is where you go after netpliance etc. by HiyaPower · · Score: 1

    this is so totally lame that ms must be getting their ideas from netpliance and clue-cat. talk about stupid...

  90. M$ employee email hitlist database by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

    THAT would be an excellent Open Source project...maintain an email hitlist of all M$ employees....spam them every time they do something stupid. Could be cool.

    JoeLinux

    The world is coming to an end. Please log off.

  91. Apples, ppft. They taste horrible. by melchoir55 · · Score: 1

    lol @ the pathetic clueless mac user. When was the last time you tried to upgrade that woderful hardware you wierdo? I hope you enjoyed being reemed up the ass for the price since apple has a monopoly on its hardware. Dumbass.

    1. Re:Apples, ppft. They taste horrible. by Auckerman · · Score: 1
      "When was the last time you tried to upgrade that woderful hardware you wierdo?"

      Last year, personally. I picked up a 300Mhz G3 upgrade for my old 6116 (60Mhz/601PPC). Worked fine. Did you have trouble fitting that new mobo in your 486's or P1's case or did you have to buy a new case too (along with the new RAM and processor you had to buy)?

      What other things did I do? Hmm...Put a Maxtor drive in a G4(dual), put more ram than you could possibly imagine in a G4 (2GB...that extra slot works), installed Linux on it, and run our custom software faster than any x86 machine on the market.

      What's gonna happen when you want to upgrade to that P4? Your gonna have to buy a new case, motherboard and power supply. That's called, where I'm from anyways, buying a new computer. So much for the PC myth of upgrade ability.

      --

      Burn Hollywood Burn
    2. Re:Apples, ppft. They taste horrible. by Millennium · · Score: 2

      When was the last time you tried to upgrade that woderful hardware you wierdo?

      Last month. Processor upgrade. Worked fine.
      Three months ago, another 128 megs RAM. Worked fine.
      Before that, new internal hard drive. Worked fine.
      Earlier still, another 64. Still worked fine.
      Then of course there were the video and TV cards I added (I now run a two-headed Mac, thank you very much). All of it worked fine. Oh, and there's the external hard drives and CD burner.

      Next on the list: a USB/FireWire combined card. If the other upgrades are any indication at all, it'll work fine.

      I hope you enjoyed being reemed up the ass for the price since apple has a monopoly on its hardware.

      Which is precisely why the only hardware I buy from Apple is the original system itself. The video/TV cards, the RAM, the drives, the burner, and processor upgrade... none of them are from Apple. Apple does overcharge for peripherals (have you seen the ungodly prices they're charging for the RAM upgrades they just started offering?) but the CPU's are more than worth every last penny.

      Ever owned a Mac? I thought not. Very, very few people who call Macs overpriced ever have. All I can say is, own one and you'll understand.
      ----------

  92. You are useless. by TheReverand · · Score: 1
    What are you stupid? That has NOTHING to do with what you posted. You said

    I install it, then everyone get a notice to change how they reach me.

    I wasn't talking about your mom, your cousin, your Grandma. I was talking about YOU. YOu are slamming Microsoft when YOU are too lazy to read the things that pop up in front of you. As a matter of fact, most of my friends who are "cluebies" tend to freak out and stop what they are doing when they don't understand a message, and immediately call me or another of their "geek" friends to explain it to them.

    Got it?

    So I ask again. Were you lying in your original post or are you just stupid?

  93. Spam != free by CmdrTHAC0 · · Score: 2

    Linux is free, in the same way that picking up a recipe leaflet in a supermarket is free. If you start assuming time is a cost, then nothing is free and virtually every company in the world will be open to lawsuits.

    When someone prints a recipe leaflet, it costs them money. The cost of Linux is borne by the developers that chose to donate their time.

    The cost of spam is borne by several people: the moron who runs an open relay, the owners of routers and gateways en route, the bandwidth, and the disk space the victim's mail server uses to store the message. All the spammer needs to do is send 1 message with the victims in the BCC: field. They pay little of the actual cost, if any---some spam from free trial accounts at their ISP.

    So the point is that some commmunications are banned because of who pays. Junk faxes operate on the same principle as spam; the receiver pays for the toner and paper, and the sender only pays for the fax line. Junk snail mail and telephone salespeople are fine (legally) because the sender pays for the printing and postage or the long-distance call.
    ___ CmdrTHAC0 ___

    --
    __CmdrTHAC0__
    In Soviet Russia, Spanish Inquisition doesn't expect YOU!!
    1. Re:Spam != free by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      If I pick up a recipe leaflet, it's free to me. If a friend gives me a copy of Linux, it's free to me. Neither are free to whoever made it, but that's not the point.

  94. ..and HotMail messes with your URLs by jeorgen · · Score: 1
    I sent an HTML file containing bookmarks inline from Netscape to my Hotmail account, in order to transfer the file to a course I'm holding. Lo and behold when the file arrives inlined with all URLs prepended with a logging facility, so

    http://www.foo.bar

    becomes:

    http://64.4.14.250/cgi-bin/linkrd?_lang=EN&lah=f74 234214fea43q52453245613&lat=9700 81359&hm ___action=http://www.foo.bar

    ... and this is a page full of bookmarks. So all course particiants must go through Microsoft so that they know how often my participants click on links MS has absolutely nothing to do with...

    /jeorgen

  95. Microsucks! by FrdPrefct · · Score: 1

    What do you expect? This is how they get users..
    They have to annoy the sh*t out of them until
    they give in and use their product.

    http://www.microsucks.com

    Microsoft Sucks!

  96. Viral marketing gone berserk? by Senior+Frac · · Score: 2

    As I see it, the problem here is that the software is encouraging the ignorant to violate internet ethics. The end-user should get what they deserve, which is possible termination of their internet connection for spamming. I encourage everyone to report anyone using this feature to their ISP. But this is not the true problem here. While "my friend" might have technically sent me an unsolicited email, the message (i.e. content) is from Microsoft; given that the user cannot alter the message. It is a very slick twist on viral marketing which I find extremely distasteful. Where are all these Chief Privacy Officers I keep hearing about? Self-regulation at work.

    --

  97. ILOVEYOU... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    was not a virus.

    It was a public beta.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  98. Hey! by superdoo · · Score: 2

    With features like this, who needs bugs?

  99. Typical M$ half-hearted effort... by belroth · · Score: 1
    If M$ had done a proper job they would have put this rider at the bottom of every email sent from every M$ product, and also have their email products strip it out. That way they only 'selectively target' people not using their products already.

    No-one does a proper job these days...
    ----

    --
    I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  100. Re:Microsoft FUD by nagora · · Score: 1
    Yes, yes. Obviously in the land of dreams that you inhabit unsolicited email advertisments are not spam. Back in the real world that's one of the most basic forms of spam.

    The "I have changed my address" function is a feature; the "why not use our shitty products" bit is spam.

    I don't know why I even bother typing things like this to MS zealots.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  101. Of course it is not spam!!!! by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1
    that [automatically I suppose] sends e-mails to everyone in your Outlook Address...

    Of course it is not spam; we all know what kind of program does that kind of action, this is a MS sponsored macro virus (or troyan horse given that it is put in the software).

    --
    "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  102. Re:Slashdot's (Not New) Reporting Technique by nagora · · Score: 1
    Let's take this slowwwwllllllyyy:

    It tags an ad on to the emails.

    The recipient did not say they wanted ads for MS products (neither does the sender say they want to send them).

    The advert is spam.

    Read it over a few times until you understand.

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  103. One Click by KarmaChameleon · · Score: 1

    Actually from what I understand they wanted to use One Click but as covered extensively on Slashdot that has been taken by Amazon. My sources at Microsoft say that they are looking into patenting Multiple Click.

    kc.

    --

    kc.

    "You'll have to speak up, I'm wearing a towel." - Homer J. Simpson
  104. Re:Slashdot's (Not New) Reporting Technique by afc · · Score: 1
    Sheesh, and Slashdotters wonder why people think they're whiny idiots...

    Given that you post regularly on /., does that make you a whiny idiot too? You certainly sound whiny to me...
    --

    --
    Information wants to be beer, or something like that.
  105. Just like Friends and Family by frankie · · Score: 3

    I'm surprised that no one mentioned this yet, but it reminds me of the MCI Friends and Family fiasco. Remember that one? People signed up for cheap long distance to certain numbers, but MCI conveniently neglected to mention that they would call each of these people at dinner time and say "well, your friend so-and-so gave us your number and said that you should switch to MCI".

    My extended family has boycotted MCI ever since. Too bad none of us use MSN right now -- we can't get indignant and drop their service.

  106. CAN ANY ONE SAY LOVELETTER by pchogs · · Score: 1

    This sounds like they borrowed the code from the loveletter virus.

    hee hee

  107. Officially the most ridiculous MS bashing ever. by evil+dave · · Score: 2

    Any excuse to bash MS, huh?

    First off, the users who are complaining already hit a button that said it was going to do this. It's not like it did it automatically, the user had to take action for this to take place.

    Secondly, why complain about this, and why now? How is this different from "Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://hotmail.com" or "Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com" that is at the bottom of every message sent from Hotmail, or the ad that Deja inserts at the bottom of every newsgroup post? Shouldn't you have been complaining about that before this?

    1. Re:Officially the most ridiculous MS bashing ever. by Malcontent · · Score: 2
      Oh I get it now. If I have to "take action" to send unsolicited email messages it's not spam. Has it ever occured to you that all spam starts with a human clicking a few buttons?
      I guess not. You are probably too smart for something this obvious to occur to you.

      A Dick and a Bush .. You know somebody's gonna get screwed.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  108. Warning .. M$oft spin control is on the loose. by TheViffer · · Score: 1

    Hide your email addresses!

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  109. This shouldn't come to anyone's suprise by gatesh8r · · Score: 1
    Let me explain...

    Billy Boy is getting the butt end of the stick in his lawsuit slapped against him... of course Linux is coming out of nowhere according to the lusers that can't find an "any" key and are either too incompetent or lazy to get Netscape (Go Mozilla! :), so they use Internet Exploder, and of course, "Lookout!" Express (complete with virus support)... am I someone that thinks Micor$haft is just going to attempt to keep their market by trying signing up everyone to M$N? Of course. Look... of course they're going to spam; most lusers read it they would read junk mail! So Billy Boy, only being efficant in marketing, decides to kill two birds with one stone -- keep his market of Winblowz users, and start to make other companies such as AOHell start to worry.

    I bet everyone here that M$N access will require Winblowz ME or Winblowz 2000 quickly ;)

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  110. glad I'm using junkfilter by Ben+Jackson · · Score: 1
    When I first installed junkfilter (set of anti-spam procmail scripts) I was surprised that it had a prominent option to junk ALL mail from MSN! Since I've been using it (and I get 20-50 unwanted messages a day) it's only been wrong once.

    This is just one more reason to leave JF_OPT_MSN=1!

  111. We are the Knights who LART spammers by Mtgman · · Score: 2

    Stop it! Stop sending the spam! Spamming is the one thing the Knights who LART spammers can not stand!

    [one of the knights gets a new msn address]

    Ah! I spammed us! Quick change our email address! Agh!! I spammed us again! Agh, ogh, egh [rolls around on the floor in agony]

    Steven

    --
    -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
  112. IE developers were... by WebRat · · Score: 1

    ...from Spyglass, were they not? However, I don't know where the current IE team went. Btw, I heard that Steve Capps (of Apple fame) was/is on the Macintosh IE team. Do you know any more of this?

  113. For those interested in taking a look... by painecave · · Score: 4
    For those who want to take a look at the VB code, after installation of the software, go to the hidden folder:

    C:\Program Files\MSN\MSNCoreFiles

    (And do your self a favor and make get rid of it's hidden option)

    There you will find a few .mar files. Don't be fooled, they are not short cuts to access databases as your windows may believe. Open em up in wordpad and take a looke. There is some junk in images and such, but there is also alot of VB. I wonder if the send program is in there?

  114. Re: VIRII IS A MADE UP WORD USED BY FUCKING IDIOTS by SCHiZNiT · · Score: 1

    Sorry dude, but 'virus' is latin and 'virii' is the plural. It was made up by idiots though... Romans, that is.

  115. BINGO by painecave · · Score: 3
    in file:

    C:\Program Files\MSN\MSNCoreFiles\ui.mar

    Do a search for 'recently'. It will take you to the message. Go ahead and edit it in wordpad to give yourself any email spam you would like to give.

    My personal favorite is : Security through obscurity and bad press doesn't work very well. If I could do this, pray you have your VB scripting turned off.

    1. Re:BINGO by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      Not installed and the file associations for the visual basic script (and compressed version) have been removed! :o)

  116. Officially the most ridiculous MS "feature" ever. by Tony · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I noticed it said, "About to spam everyone you know. Continue? [Yes, I'm an idiot] [No]" I'm glad it warned me it was about to send spam, instead of just letting people know my new address.

    The difference is this: Hotmail attaches their spam to the bottom of every message you send-- it doesn't automatically mass-mail everyone in your address book with that as the only content.

    Plus, the Hotmail stuff is attached to something you wrote-- so it isn't all spam. It's more like a spam sandwich; or eggs, spam, bacon and spam; or spam, spam, beans, and spam. It's not the same thing at all.

    Shouldn't you have been complaining about that before this?

    Mister, I've been complaining about it since 19-aught-28, when Sears & Roebuck started sending out catalogs. And I've been complaining about the email spam since '89. So bite me.

    Of course, I'm told I complain a lot, anyway. Whiner.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  117. Re:Naw, use it to track reboots by carlmenezes · · Score: 1

    Nopes....let's turn it around. How about a script that informs everyone on your mailing list how crappy MS Software is everytime an MS App crashes? Now THAT would generate some traffic :) It'd be popular too.... Walkin' down the road, tryin' to lighten my load, not a very fine sight to see... A fuckin' blue screen on my monitor, Everytime I boot NT. Takin it easy...I'm fuckin queasy.

    --
    Find a job you like and you will never work a day in your life.
  118. What do you expect from a Mircosoft product by selectspec · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has been exploiting its user base for over 10 years. I don't see what's new here.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  119. It's a good thing by mightbeadog · · Score: 1

    Microsoft slipped and did something everyone can understand. Most Internet users don't understand the absolute evil of "decommoditizing standards", but they do understand spam. Better yet, they understand loosing face with some or all of the people in their address book. Imagine people spamming bosses and coworkers with this. I hope Microsoft stands its ground and keeps this "service" just the way it is.

  120. quaylism by infinite+jester · · Score: 1

    i'm sure you know this, but your sig file,

    "If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure"

    was said not by al gore, but by j. danforth quayle

    </offtopic>


    --
    i thought, therefore i was...
  121. Two words by emufreak · · Score: 1
  122. Beware the tasty non-meat by Timmythec · · Score: 1
    That's right folks, get your Microsoft Certified Spam right here!!

    For only $85.99, you get full featured spam, with all the trimmings and full internet access!!

    So pre-order your Microsoft Spam right now!!

    Microsoft is not responsible for any illness, physical malformation, or any other symptom that may be connected to MS Spam. There may be many revisions to MS Spam over the course if it's existance, which includes a Service Pack or 2. Please excuse my insanity. :)

    --
    -TimmyC, Tech Guru
  123. Re:Sdot is pretty biased against MS by C.Lee · · Score: 1

    >The funny thing about your post is that it's from a hotmail account. Everyone's a
    >big fucking hypocrit when they denounce MS, because they all use MS products. If
    >you want to hate MS, that's fine, but at least don't use their products doing it!

    Dude just because somebody posted a hotmail email address *DOESN'T MEAN* he actually has an email account with HotMail. Think about it. I know a lot of people who use blah@HotMail.com instead of blah@NoSpam.com and they don't go through the hassle of actually creating a account with hotmail.

  124. ROFL. by SCHiZNiT · · Score: 1

    That was UBB code for inverted. Someone please kill me.

  125. Re: VIRII IS A MADE UP WORD USED BY FUCKING IDIOTS by cjwatson · · Score: 1

    "virii" would be the plural of "virius", which doesn't exist. The only Latin plural of "virus" that makes sense in Latin is also "virus". If you don't want to be confusing, just say "viruses" like a halfway normal English speaker.

    Not something I normally bother being pedantic about, but when people try to argue that it's right ...

  126. Simple Solution. by M@T · · Score: 1


    Get McAfee and Norton to list it as a known Outlook virus and send an update out.

    --
    'sapientia potestas est'
  127. Re:Who do you want to do today? by coyote-san · · Score: 3

    This is an automatic message from Windows Messaging to let you know that _Bob Sagertion_ was able to access his favorite web site, _http://hotdudesinaction.com_, in only click with hot new version of Windows ME!

    Windows Messaging thinks you would also like to know that _Bob Sagertion_ is available at MSN Instant Messaging address _hungry-for-c*ck_ at this very instant!

    You can join _Bob Sagertion_ at _http://hotdudesinaction.com_, or his instant message handle _hungry-for-c*ck_, by downloading your FREE trial version of MSN at the address below. (Or you can join his wife, _Sue Sagertion_, as she searches for _Salt Lake City Divorce Lawyers_.) Remember, with Windows Messaging you are sure your friends can always join you at your favorite sites!

    <i>Bob always thought that the 'paperclip' seemed a little <b>bent</b></i>

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  128. The New ICQ 2000b (AOL) uses same type of tactic by detritus. · · Score: 4

    It appears that the new ICQ 2000b uses a tactic similar to Microsoft's, where users on your contact list are by default are sent an e-mail from you to log back on to ICQ after 30 days of not being online. While this isn't nearly as intrusive as MSN's browser's feature, it still is sending messages by default without the user's knowledge (unless they look at their preferences).

    Yet more useless and annoying "features" added to ICQ's new releases after AOL's purchase of Mirabilis...

    - Slash

  129. What is to be done with spammers? by Aash · · Score: 1
    All spammers should be forcibly dragged out of their homes and lined up in the streets. They should then by shot in the head, one by one, execution-style -- preferably with a very powerful, very high caliber rifle or pistol. And it should be televised, as a warning for all potential spammers.

    That would be sweet.

    --

    --
    These aren't the droids you're looking for.
  130. i love u by abes · · Score: 1
    So, basically they realized the only useful thing to do with VBscript was to create another melissa script.

    I wonder if M$ can be brought up on charges of fradulant behavior (i.e. impersonating ppl w/o their permission).

  131. Re:The New ICQ 2000b (AOL) uses same type of tacti by jellisky · · Score: 1

    That's exactly why I refuse to update my ICQ and AIM until it no longer works on whatever system I currently have. The bloat put into so many of these current applications is sick, annoying and downright horrible. It seems that for every good new feature a program by the big corps. (M$, AOL, etc...), there are 10 others that you can't get rid of and are just plain obnoxious.

    But I could just be exagerrating or paranoid.

  132. No, M$ is still the spammer by llywrch · · Score: 2

    > Your email address will end up ORBS, RBL and several other blacklists, which means your (brand new!) email address is
    > now useless

    No, IIRC, RBL applies to the domain, not the account on the domain. (A site gets black holed if it consistently proves itself unwilling to kick spammers & other abuse-types off of it's system.)

    In other words, msn.com will get RBLed. AGAIN. After they made the minimum feeble attempts to crawl out of that space.

    It's amazing that a company which prides itself for attracting so many ``smart people" has so many marketroids that get it in repeated trouble over so many issues that a couple minutes of applied commonsense would avoid.

    Geoff

    --
    I think I see a trend here. Maybe for them it really would be easier to muzzle the entire internet than to produce p
  133. Muddled Thinking From CmdrTaco by buzzini · · Score: 1
    I guess we can add "Spamming" as another "Business" where Microsoft can use its monopoly status to its advantage.

    To which supposed monopoly are you referring? If you're referring to the supposed OS monopoly then how is MSN Explorer leveraging that? It has nothing to do with Windows. If it's a monopoly of Internet client software you're referring to, then I'd defer to the numbers on that: AOL has 23 million members vs. MSN's 3 or so million (despite being on the desktop since Windows 95).

    Further, Microsoft has agreed to rewrite the email message send: check out this story on C|Net.
  134. This is called FORGERY! by HaeMaker · · Score: 1

    There was a decision from the circuit court of appeals a while back (some of you legal types might be able to find it) that sending email from your account is as good as signing it.

    Mail sent on your behalf without marking it as such is FORGERY, and thus illegal.

  135. Re:Play 23 Questions by tolan-b · · Score: 1

    Joan Cartwright?
    hmm....
    Nono wait, i think i got it....ummm

  136. Not just Spam, also blows out POP access by TomV · · Score: 1
    quoted from Woody's Office Watch, #5.42 (www.woodyswatch.com) - note that these people are usually MS's friends...
    "WOWser Rick Tripple alerted me to yet another truly bizarre side-effect to installing MSN Explorer Preview 2. Rick says that if you have an MSN email account - say, woody@msn.com, for example - installing MSN Explorer Preview 2 *permanently* prevents you from ever using Outlook or Outlook Express to retrieve mail from that account.

    Yeah. You read that right. If you have an @msn.com email address, and you install MSN Explorer Preview 2, Microsoft permanently re-routes the MSN email account so all of the mail that's sent to your @msn.com address actually gets delivered to Hotmail.

    As a result, you can't use Outlook or Outlook Express to look at your @msn.com mail. You have to use Hotmail. Period. And if you change your mind about MSN Explorer Preview 2 and uninstall it - tough cookies, bucko. Your @msn.com account can't be changed back to the way it was.

    What's the big deal, you ask? It's all about access.

    Many people use Outlook offline. You probably log on to the Internet periodically (by clicking the Send/Receive button, or by setting up Outlook to retrieve messages every 10 or 20 minutes), retrieve incoming messages, disconnect from the Internet (that's usually automatic after Send/Receive is done), then work on your email: construct replies, compose new messages and so on. When you're done with the current batch of email, you log back onto the Internet (or Outlook does it for you automatically), send the messages you typed, and retrieve any new ones that may be hanging around. That's cool. Lots of people will download their messages onto a portable computer, then work on their email while they're riding to work, munching on lunch, or flying to Timbuktu.

    Hotmail's different. In order to use Hotmail, you have to be connected to the Web, period. You can't see your messages unless you're connected. You can't reply to them. You can't even compose a new message, unless you're on the Web, and everything (including Hotmail) is working. That's a huge difference, especially if you're accustomed to working on email while you're on the move.

    MSN Explorer Preview 2 will only let you compose messages when you're online, connected to Hotmail. If you want to work on email while you're on a plane, well, sorry, that just isn't possible.

    This whole situation is so bizarre, I thought at first that Rick must've been mistaken. So I contacted the MSN folks at Waggener Edstrom (Microsoft's PR company), and they pretty much confirmed everything that Rick was saying."

    So apart from p15sing off all your friends, colleagues, clients, customers, ...., MSN messenger also forces you to entirely change the way you work with email, like it or not.

    TomV

  137. My Professional Opinion Counts by mr.nicholas · · Score: 1
    (short post)

    This is an outrage simply because the email sent out seems to imply that I am endorsing this product to folks in my address book. Since I am a computer professional, it will seem like I have reviewed this product for my business' consumption and am suggestion it.

    Imagine a copy of it going out to my boss who thinks I actually wrote it! My opinion counts to my fellow employees and employers. I wouldn't want it tainted with the suggestion of this product.

    Granted I probably wouldn't use MSN Explorer if I were a good computer professional, but still!

  138. using M$ even makes you look bad by kordoba · · Score: 1

    couldn't agree more ! but after all, do i care ? - NO. the only good about this is that we are witnessing the next nail in M$'s coffin (quite a bit they are...:)

  139. Re:Play 23 Questions by Hairy_Potter · · Score: 1

    Hmm, 23, I can't of anything to do with 23 except that it's prime.

    1) Did you post, with your nick, in the keyboard contents topic?

    2) Did your post, with your nick, in the Katz death of politics topic?

    thank you

  140. spam spam spam spam by Trracer · · Score: 1
    Reminds me of one of those "make money fast" emails I recieved a couple of days back.
    The message ended with:
    Under Bill s.1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th US Congress this letter cannot be considered spam as long as the sender includes contact information and a method of removal.

    And do I need to say it came from an "exploited" SMTP-server using a fake reply-to?
    And how the F*CK can US law apply to me when I am a Swedish citizen living in Sweden?
    Well, after notifying the owner of the sending SMTP-server he quickly fixed his problem.
    --
    English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska :-
  141. Re:Sdot is pretty biased against MS by zachg · · Score: 1

    You really ought to know Hotmail is NOT their product - it was the brain-child of young entrepeanur, who Microsoft offered millions to buy it off him. That, there, is the premise of pretty much ALL "their" products. If you can't copy it/steal it BUY it!

  142. feeding the troll by mr.ska · · Score: 1
    Not that I should grace you with an answer, but I'm going to tell you why my next computer is going to be a Mac.

    I bought my current Wintel box 3 years ago this October. For that purchase, I had decided to pay good money (lots of it) for near top-of-the-line hardware so that I would still have a viable upgrade path in the future. So I plunked down my hard-earned cash and bought a 233 MHz PII with 64 MB RAM, a 3 GB HDD, and a few expansion slots filled with various things.

    Less than 6 months later, my computer was not upgradable. Why? Changed the bus speed - all my RAM is garbage now. Changed the socket for the CPU - I was now constrained to a max of 333 MHz, which I probably couldn't find to save my life. So my "upgradable" computer needs a new motherboard if I want to improve the speed at all.

    Third party Mac hardware makers at least try to give you something worthy to upgrade to - new CPU daughterboards and the like - unlike the Wintel mafia which just fscks you up the cornhole and tells you to smile.

    --

    Mr. Ska

  143. Re:Sdot is pretty biased against MS by gmagill · · Score: 1

    Then there are a few companies (Symantec/Norton being the best example) who don't allow them to play that shit.

  144. You got it wrong, VC++ is harder by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 1

    An AC wrote:

    > VC++ is targetted more at less experienced
    > developers. There was an interview linked to
    > from slashdot at some point where the project
    > lead for VC++ said as much.

    Never used VC++, have you? I have. I've also had a few years of experience with UNIX programming (before Linux was born), and Windows SDK programming with the Microsoft C compiler. Of the three, I would definitely say that VC++ Windows programming (not the DOS) is the hardest, most convoluted of all. To do anything as simple as a hello world window for MFC, you have to customize four big objects, one of which is a "document" class (where is the document in simply displaying "hello world"?). And what you get is a window complete with menus and stuff, not a simple window with "hello world" in it. I won't even get into COM or any of the other MS acronyms of the week. The entire mess is market driven, with new "technologies" invented at the drop of the hat, not to help the developer, but to achieve dominance for MS. It is no wonder most Windows developers who believe they have no other choices, go for Visual Basic. Linux developers have it easy with good tools, and libraries like qt that actually make some sense. Heck, you can do a "hello world" in only a few lines with gcc and qt!

    Let's face it, Microsoft is a worst case scenario of a market driven company. The latest thing with the Explorer spam is just one symptom of that, the messed up developement environment is another. Now, ideally, market driven is supposed to mean that the marketing department is keeping the products on track with consumer wants. In this case, market driven means that every feature, every part of every product is designed with one thing in mind: Microsoft world domination. And of course it all crashes, fixing bugs only helps the user, and MS doesn't give a heck for the user. Even if that user is a developer.

    1. Re:You got it wrong, VC++ is harder by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Agreed VC++ is a pig... So is C Builder. It's not necessarily the compilers fault, it's that convoluted fuzking API. It Heinious. I've always enjoyed working with Posix type API's. Perhaps it's that at heart I never really got used to the whole pseudo-object orientated API gig. Of course the smart developer who was short on time, couldn't be stuffed writing contorted GUI code but still needs a powerfull fast compiler will always use Delphi. Well ought to anyway. Not everyone agrees though. Fair enuff.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  145. Re: VIRII IS A MADE UP WORD USED BY FUCKING IDIOTS by sMiles · · Score: 1

    Oh, like the plural of denarius wasn't 'denarii'? (Roman coinage, in case you were wondering). I'm sure there are plenty of other examples for the grammar nazis to add. How many bets that the original complainer about virii is a well-educated US citizen who still only speaks his own retarded-spelling version of English? color! donut! OH, how I tire (sic) of these Amoronicisms (tm). Shame on you, cjw44 - is that flatline thing the record of your brainwaves? Miles

    --
    Ooh, I'm dying for a sig...
  146. Spamming mobile phones by Royan · · Score: 1
    Or even better, allows you to pick and choose who[m] you want informed

    In particular, it would be pretty nasty to not filter out of the To list addresses like 0.555.HER.PHONE@sms-gateway.her-network.com. It's unlikely that could be done programatically.

    Receiving on my Nokia a suggestion to change my mail reader isn't something I'm really likely to find useful, and waking me up at 4am to suggest this would be - somewhat unendearing.

  147. Re:Win2k by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1
    WOW!!!!

    To change my DNS server, I have to press 3 buttons. One to get to TCP/IP properties,

    Please, O Win2k guru, please explain to me how to get to TCP/IP properties in one button. It took me fifteen minutes the first time I tried.

    And though I was pleasantly surprised to find I didn't have to reboot to change IP address, I still rebooted once for each of a large number of changes to the default options under "services", and had to reboot *three* times to remove the default install of "Active Directory Services". Which then screwed up any number of other things but reduced my bootup time from somtething over ten minutes to 1:30.

    Really, I'm not trying to troll; it's just that I recently got stuck with a Win2k server to admin (if you want to call it that) and I honestly didn't know there was a way to get to TCP/IP properties in a single click. Maybe you could publish a "Win2k shortcuts for Clueless Newbies" reference card?

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  148. It's not an ideal world. by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    You have a point, but in general it would only really stand if the majority of people were more well-educated than they currently are, and if the education system taught people how to think etc etc.

    Unfortunately this is not the case, and the majority of Windows users, when presented with a message box, will immediately get frightened and confused, and will click on whatever the default selection for dialog box is.

    It's kind of like MS in court saying "most people choose Internet Explorer over Netscape Navigator ... but if you dig deeper into their study you find a bit of extra detail: that 90% of people who "chose" IE gave "it came with my computer" as their reason for this "choice".

    However unfortunate this may be, it is just the way things are - and Microsoft knows that very well, and they do stuff like this deliberately to take advantage of all these people. So I'm sorry, this does not excuse MS for doing this.

  149. Somewhat similar experience with MS by BeanThere · · Score: 1

    For some reason I once filled in my email address on a Microsoft web page, I can't remember why, but I know I must have had a good reason :), and I know I would not have consented to receiving anything from them.

    From then on I received periodic spam from them. The spam gave clear instructions on how to remove oneself from their spam list. This could be done in two ways, by sending a message to a given email address, or by requesting on their web site that you be removed. I first tried the email option.

    Soon afterwards I got some more spam from them.

    So I tried the web page option, *and* the email option again.

    Soon afterwards I got some more spam from them.

    So I tried the web page option several more times.

    Soon afterwards I got some more spam from them.

    I gave up on this. The email address was one of my email aliases, so I deleted the alias.

    Even though I have a lot of knowledge about MS's shady business practices, I at least expected a little bit of professionalism from them with this. But I guess that was too much to expect.

  150. Re:l;sdkgsdlhfgsdkltfsu by zzsql7 · · Score: 1

    speaking of spam. wft is that?