Slashdot Mirror


Bonsaikitten Eaten By Carnivore

Two nuggets from the FBI today - this: "Freedom of speech apparently doesn't apply to some topics. Take cute animals, for example. If it had been BonsaiSloth.com, we probably wouldn't seeing this." And this: "It seems that the FBI is changing Carnivore's name to "DCS1000" apparently because it 'made the system sound like a predatory device made to invade people's privacy'. I'm sure a snide remark about "truth in advertising" fits here."

309 comments

  1. Spider kitten by BSOD+Bitch · · Score: 3

    I have recently learned the art of the Bonsai Kitten taught to me by my grandfather Tai Mai Choo. This method has allowed me to develop many of my own.

    My primary method is what I call the Spider Kitten. In this method, the kittens' feet are tied with four nylon strings. The end of each string is streched to a point in which 4 small 5 foot high posts reside. There are four posts total; for each leg. The kittens' paws are tied to each of these posts for a period of 3 weeks. However, you must tighten the strings a little each day to avoid the legs from growing above the kittens' heads'. Proper feeding is required. After the 3 week period is up, the kitten is set free.

    We have sucess fully grown kittens with legs up to 48 inches per leg. The cat can now almost stand face to face with it's master. It is a very painless process for the kitten. And I hope these cats will be adored and loved in your home.

    WARNING: These kittens are NOT recommended to people with large quantaties of furniture. This is due to the fact that these kittens have an unusual way of marking their territory with their claws.

    We also recommend that you keep these kittens on a leash, for the tend to run very fast, and are hard to catch.

    --


    M$ stock dropped in 1/2 since last year. If you are a MCSE, you will be broke.
    1. Re:Spider kitten by Tackhead · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, but does silk shoot outa yer cat's tits like it does on my goat's"?

    2. Re:Spider kitten by BSOD+Bitch · · Score: 1

      No genetic science was involved in the making of these cats.

      --


      M$ stock dropped in 1/2 since last year. If you are a MCSE, you will be broke.
    3. Re:Spider kitten by BSOD+Bitch · · Score: 1

      Try this instead. Dunno who you think I am, but you are mistaken... About a great many things.

      --


      M$ stock dropped in 1/2 since last year. If you are a MCSE, you will be broke.
    4. Re:Spider kitten by BSOD+Bitch · · Score: 1

      This techniqe is legal. It has been practiced in the United States for many years. I will inform our lawyers if this problem with you persists.

      --


      M$ stock dropped in 1/2 since last year. If you are a MCSE, you will be broke.
  2. Re:The Right Wing America has won people. by robert-porter · · Score: 1

    I think your confused by the "Right Wing America", if bonsaikitty.com is ilegal it's because of a bill that Clinton passed. Both the Left and the Right are bad at making decisions based on political correctness, if you really cared you'd be a libretarian. Don't base your opinion of a political party on what the opposing party says, theres a reason that people have a low opinion of politics. I recomend that you get your political news from left AND right sources, not only that study the stuff yourself(it's rather intresting), you'll find that many people lie because of their idealism. You'd be suprised how many republicans I know that the only place they get their news is Rush Limbaugh, the same goes for democrats, many get all their news from democratic sources ONLY.

  3. 101 uses for a dead cat by vtweb · · Score: 1

    Will the FBI investigate the book,
    "101 uses for a dead cat"? It was a book
    of cartoons, all centered around imaginative
    uses for deceased felines. I am a cat lover,
    but found the book a hoot (as I do bonsaikitten)

  4. I want my Kitten by onepoint · · Score: 2

    sing it to dire straights money for nothing

    I want my Bonziakitten.....

    Now look at them yo-yo's
    that's the way you do it
    You stuff a kitten on your lab table

    That ain't workin'
    that's the way you do it
    kittens are for nothing
    and and the jars are free

    Now that ain't workin'
    that's the way you do it
    Lemme tell ya that guys not dumb
    Maybe get a cat bite on your little finger
    Maybe get a claw on your thumb

    we got to drill some breating holes
    Custom jars with garuanteed deliveries...

    We gotta move these big old cats
    We gotta move these breathing tubess....

    I shoulda learned to stuff the cat
    I shoulda learned to drill some holes

    Look at that peta person ,
    she got it stickin' her nose in my door
    Man we could have some fun
    And she's up there,
    what's that? Calaco perrs?
    Bangin' on the lid
    like a chimpanzee

    That ain't workin'
    that's the way you do it
    kittens are for nothing
    and and the jars are free

    We gotta move these big old cats
    We gotta move these breathing tubess....

    This is a workin'
    that's the way you do it
    you stuff your kinnen on the desk top
    That ain't workin'
    that's the way you do it
    kittens are for nothing
    and and the jars are free

    kittens are for nothing
    and and the jars are free
    kittens are for nothing
    and and the jars are free

    I want my Bonziakitten
    I want my Bonziakitten
    I want my Bonziakitten



    spambait e-mail
    my web site artistcorner.tv hip-hop music news
    please help me make it better

    --
    if you see me, smile and say hello.
  5. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

    Shitty, long, run-on sentances from someone who gets judgemental about people to switch letters on accident. Poor grammar is a hell of a lot worse than one typo.

    To continue, your point is basically 'I don't think it should be illegal, and I don't think they should be arrested, but the FBI should be able to invade their privacy, attack them, and probably take all of their computer equipment... just to give 'em a bit of a scare, so they'll think twice.'

    Do you want a shitty police state to live in, where the government can harrass you just because you have controversial views? I'm sure there are plenty of Middle Eastern nations where you can get that wish fulfilled.

    The USA is supposed to be about freedom. Thanks to whiners like you, it's turning into Politically Correct world. I don't have a problem with being kind to others, and I certainly believe in equality for all. But I have the right to say whatever the fuck I want, and that covers pictures and writing, and paintings, and all other sorts of shit. If you don't agree, don't go to the site.

    Clean up your fucking grammar, learn how to make multiple sentances out of that fucked-up run on shit you just posted, further learn how to make paragraphs out of those sentances, and eventually, you might be easy to read. Until you've done most of that, don't talk about other people's writing skills. Fucking dolt.

    --

    When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
  6. Re:1000? by grarg · · Score: 2

    Alas, Scott Adams has already copyrighted the GruntMaster 6000 so this was obviously their fallback. Btw, doesn't "DCS" bear a scary aural resemblance to "DeCSS"?

    --
    The conclusion of your syllogism, I said lightly, is fallacious, being based on licensed premises
  7. Re:Joke? Yeah� Is it obvious to everyone? No� by FuzzyOne · · Score: 1

    Congress shall make no law requiring jokes to be spelled out for the benefit of the humor-impaired.

    --Amendment 42 of The New and Improved Constitution o' the United States of America©

  8. Re:My Cats will bloody well climb into anything... by FUNMerlin · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend totally agrees with you, dood.

    --
    "please could you stop the noise im tryin a get some REST? from all the unbornchikkenVoicesin my head?"
  9. Shhh! by Geekenstein · · Score: 1

    Nobody tell them about http://www.realhamster.com/. We'll have the ASPCA all over them too.

  10. Re:read this first by b0r1s · · Score: 1

    you obviously didn't read the link i posted, nor did you understand the original intent of the parent post... the modern definition of trolling often focuses more on crapflooding and nonsense than insightful trolls... this is what i'm referring to, not the well thought out, pseudo intelligent comments.

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  11. The rule of jokes by soybean · · Score: 1

    If you don't know who the but of a joke is, then it's you.

  12. Re:Sigh... by Finni · · Score: 1
    You didn't even check out the site.

    Alas, our universe has only 3 spatial dimensions, so even Acme's dedicated engineers can't make a true Klein Bottle.

    A Klein Bottle cannot be embedded in 3 dimensions, but you can immerse it in 3-D. (An immersion may have self-intersections; Embeddings have no self-intersections. Neither an embedding nor an immersion has folds or cusps.)

    We represent a Klein Bottle in glass by stretching the neck of a bottle through its side and joining its end to a hole in the base. Except at the side-connection (the nexus), this properly shows the shape of a 4-D Klein Bottle.

    taken from

    http://www.kleinbottle.com/whats_a_klein_bottle.ht m

    Damn straight he's on the level. I just bought one for a friend. It's also Cliff Stoll, of The Cuckoo's Egg

  13. has anyone called the number? by Cletus+Doyle+White · · Score: 1

    Has anyone tried calling the number on the bonsaikittens.com webpage right at the top of the screen under the main logo? The number is 212-662-7544. I'm too lazy to do it myself, but if anyone does try it, let me know what it says.

  14. Re:Bullshit... by Quarters · · Score: 1

    Why should humor have to be clearly labeled as such? Why do you condone the censorship of certain types of speech? Do you feel that the inhabitants of the world have become so stupid that we must spell everything out for them?

    Nothing on bonsaikitten goes against the first amendment--end of story. There is nothing that should be (and, if you believe in just laws, could be) done against the owners of the site.

  15. Genie in a bottle? by gvonk · · Score: 1

    "Bloody RIAA. They can't keep the genie in the bottle. New technology allows people to get there hands on loadsa music."


    Genie in the bottle? More like cat in the bottle!

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  16. Animal Rights Wacko at it again!!! by tarbabyxxxx · · Score: 1

    Your message regarding the Web site www.bonsaikitten.com was forwarded to me today; I am an Issues Specialist in the Companion Animals section of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). The bonsaikitten Web site first appeared in late December. We received hundreds of complaints over just two days. In response, we investigated the origin of the site and found that the site was being hosted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). In speaking with the MIT Network Manager, we found out that the name and address the site is registered to, a "Dr. Michael Wong" in New York, is false information. The creator of the site is actually a student at MIT who initially created the site as a joke amongst friends, then, encouraged by all the negative attention he was receiving, decided to make a statement about his right to free speech by keeping his site up and running despite requests remove it. MIT was very supportive of the concerns of animal organizations and citizens sending in complaints about the site. Despite the legal protest about the student's free speech rights, MIT removed the site on December 22. In addition, a local humane organization has investigated as well (the student claimed to have used computer graphics to create the shots of kittens in jars). We began receiving complaints about the bonsaikitten site being back up again several days ago. I have contacted MIT, which is not hosting the site. I have contacted the group we suspect is hosting this site and have stated our concerns and asked that the site be taken down. I am currently waiting for a response. I will be glad to contact you when I have any further update on this situation. In the meantime, please advise those concerned NOT to send e-mail or otherwise contact the person running this site (I believe there is some contact information listed on the Web pages). As I mentioned, it appears that he is only encouraged by the negative attention and the more he receives the stronger his resolve to keep the site up and running will be. Thank you for your concern. Please feel free to share this response with others who are concerned about this site. Sincerely, Julie Shellenberger Issues Specialist, Companion Animal Outreach The Humane Society of the United States www.hsus.org

    --
    Will the last company to abandon Linux please turn off the lights??!
  17. Re:Have you seen what cat breeders do? by Trepalium · · Score: 1
    Most purebred animals do end up that way. Either incredibly stupid, or with horrible genetic flaws that shorten or degrade their life substancially. The gene pool for these animals is getting incredibly small since no one wants to breed mixture animals, they're usually neutered and owned by middle-class families that could never afford to care for multiple offspring from the pet. You have German Shepard dogs that are renowned for the inteligence and power, that have severe hip and joint problems within three to five years after birth. Stupid inattentive cats like those Persians that everyone likes to dress up.

    Usually mongrels (dog or cat) are a better choice, if for no other reason that the odds may be in the pet's favor to have a long and healthy life. You might not end up with an award winning pet, but you should have a friend and companion that you can share many, many years with.

    --
    I used up all my sick days, so I'm calling in dead.
  18. Hyperactive cat people... by FigWig · · Score: 1

    are fucking wierd. Check out this site for more cat induced fun! Half the fun is reading the hate mail from people who are just a bit too sensitive about cats.

    --
    Scuttlemonkey is a troll
  19. Klein bottles by shalunov · · Score: 1
    since I'm addressing the humor-impaired, I should probably point out that http://www.kleinbottle.com is a joke as well.
    Being apparently humor-impaired I bought a clear glass three-dimensional immersion of a Klein bottle from this guy maybe half a year ago, and was quite happy with my order.
  20. Re:Sigh... by jellicle · · Score: 1

    Kleinbottle.com is real. The structures that they sell aren't true klein bottles, but they're as close as you can come in three dimensions. Great gifts.

  21. Isn't it obvious... by zhensel · · Score: 1

    For a bunch of GNU/Linux fans, you all are slow to catch on to a recursive acronym: DCS1000 Castrates Speech.

    Oh yeah, I'm all for that cat thing. I've detested those furry bastards ever since one pissed in a pile of clothes in my room long ago. I won't go into what happened to that particular specimen. Oh crap! Gotta go get the door - I just heard three loud, crisp knocks.

  22. Re:My Cats will bloody well climb into anything... by Carceron · · Score: 1

    Oh man, you totaly hit the nail on the head there. Very good points. I have 2 cats. And at first when I started reading this I was really feeling sick. But as soon as I realized this is a joke. I could not stop laughing. I was laughing so hard there were tears coming down my cheaks.

  23. Re:Censorship has bipartisan support by elflord · · Score: 2
    Both sides have their censorship agendas. I'm a leftist, but I am not terribly happy with what the Dems are doing wrt censorship. However, the conservatives (for example, the Republicans) aren't any better. They've been trying to censor art, porn, and music for years.

    My feeling was that both the major parties ignored young people in their conventions, and exclusively targetted families and seniors, hence we saw some pro-censorship agendas from both sides.

    However, I don't really see what vegetarianism has to do with censorship though -- I'm afraid the relevance of that remark escapes me.

  24. Re:Evidence of animal abuse by Orange+Smlf · · Score: 1

    The site is obviously a joke! But what about the recent "Goldfish in a blender" artwork recently displayed in a Danish Museum,leaving the visitors to ponder if the blender was actually operational and hooked up to the power grid, eventually one visitor decided flick the switch on the blender..the rest is history and so was the goldfish!

  25. Animal "Rights" by Detritus · · Score: 1
    I've always wondered what would happen if I opened a gourmet restaurant that served such dishes as rat burgers, calico cat stew and poodle steaks. What is the real difference between a cow and a dog? Do cats and dogs get special rights because they are "cute"?

    There was a big controversy in California over the sale of horses to out-of-state slaughterhouses. Many people thought it was culturally incorrect to eat horse meat.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  26. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by Samus · · Score: 1

    I agree that it is horrible for different reasons. It may be a joke but there is more than likely somebody stupid enough out there try it at home. Its just a little bit too feasible for my tastes. Thought it could be the alcohol making it seem that way.

    "What are the three words guaranteed to humiliate men everywhere?

    --
    In Republican America phones tap you.
  27. It IS! by bobdole369 · · Score: 1

    Well, isn't it a predatory device used to prey on the average person? Come on, I thought this was common knowledge... :)

    --
    Lousy facepalm.
  28. OK, this will get modded down but... by dvk · · Score: 2
    ... it's only karma :)

    As usual, the typical anti-law-enforcement knee-jerk reaction from /. people. FBI is OBLIGATED to investigate this site that apparently violates a federal law, whether this site seems to be a dumb satire or not based on common sense. FBI is not arresting anyone - they are investigating to SEE whether the site is for real violation of the law or not.

    If I posted pictures of dismembered people on my web site, would YOU know whether i'm being a sick moron or a psycho serial killer? And if you claim to know, i'd like to find out where did you get your Ph.D. in psychology from, as well as what criminal profiling jobs have you had, since Joe "this is obviusly not for real" Average Slashdotter simply doesn't have suficient background to be able to distinguish between the two - yes, most likely it's simply a sick prank but you never know 100% sure.

    Oh, and didn't Jeffrey Dalhmer start out with pets too? I shot off an e-mail to my psych-educated friend to clarify if this is a verifiable trend but I expect it to be so.

    Yes, if this was a prank and FBI actually harrasses the idjits after verifying this, this would become a First Amendement issue. Right now itr is not.

    -DVK

    --
    "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
  29. Re:Bullshit... by ZeroConcept · · Score: 2

    "Society got to the point where we couldn't offend anyone, the Irish, Jewish, Cat-lovers, Dog-lovers, etc, etc..."

    It's not about racial groups, it's about animal abuse...human cruelty.

    Time after time what was before seen as a form of entertainment is later identified as a form of brutality and abolished.

    Look at the Roman empire and the Coliseum, I am sure at that time there were people that thought that was a horrible show while most of the mob thought it was fun thing to watch.

    Look at slavery....
    Look at cannibalism...
    Look at human sacrifices...
    Look at genocide...
    Look at animal experiments (yes they are nastier than you might imagine)...

    Those were all acceptable in their time by people like you and rejected by people like me. I'm glad people that think cruelty is not human right are the ones shaping the world.

    BTW...I'm a vegan

  30. Re:Bullshit... by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

    You mean like breeding them, raising them in pens and coops for the sole purpose of killing them, devouring their corpses, flesh and organs, and walking about in their skin and fur?

    I can't believe you would dare compare cruelty against cute, smart, fuzzy, fluffy, straight from heaven creatures like Kittens to those gross, dumb animals like cows. There isn't any comparison! What kind of sick perverted freak are you? Kitten are cute, and nice, and warm, and fuzzy, and cute, and cute, and nice. Cows are stupid, ignorant creatures, who are ugly and deserve what they get. If me and my Animal Activist friends ever catch you on the street, we'll be sure to have words with you, right after we get done eating our dolphin safe tuna. ;)

    Heh, looks like the moderators on that board are in full troll-hunt mode, so I have to get my "Hypocritical Animal Rights Activists" rant off my chest here, sorry for the indulgence.

  31. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by tunesmith · · Score: 1
    Actually, you don't even have to defend their right to say it. You aren't the government.

    --
    skkkoooonnnggggkkk ptui
  32. The real problem by Oztun · · Score: 2

    Everyone who is against this site makes the same argument, "What if a child sees and does it?". This is just another case of America forgetting it's up to parents to raise their children. I just can't believe the FBI is acting this insane.

  33. Re:You don't get it, do you? by elflord · · Score: 1
    Freely spreading music is nice, but the problem is that the napsterite thugs want to "freely spread" music without the artists consent, and this is at best rude to the artist.

    I think the point the poster makes however is thatthe napster mob use the fact that the technology can be abused as a justification for their abuse of it -- there's a prevailing attitude that if you can't stop the napster users, they are in the right. (a classic might-makes right argument that expresses the true mob-mentality of the napsterites) However, in this instance, they are hesitant to apply the same argument to the FBI (namely that they can abuse the technology, therefore they should do so without restraint)

  34. Re:Bullshit... by SnowDog_2112 · · Score: 1

    Damnit, I wanted to post a nice thoughtful reply on their message board, but after half an hour of fucking around with things, I had lost several postings and it still wouldn't recognize my login even after I activated it.

    Man, they ask for a lot of info before they let you post, too. Wow.

    Oh well. Their loss.

    :-)

    --
    Not representing or approved by my company or anybody else.
  35. Evidence of animal abuse by Sanity · · Score: 1
    If this website constitutes evidence that animals have been abused, then they should be punished (I suggest forcing them into a small jar for several months). If this is a parody and those images are artificial, then it should be left alone (which is more likely). Taking down the website without punishing them for their crime (if a crime had taken place) would be getting it totally backwards.

    --

    1. Re:Evidence of animal abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dude did you even go to the site? It's obviously a joke, but someone who is easily trolled would get set off.

      That's all it is, it's a troll site, it's trolling lusers who can't take a joke, just like most posts on slashdot.

    2. Re:Evidence of animal abuse by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      Had you read the story, you would know the whole site is a joke. No kittens were harmed, only photoshop images.
      -

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Evidence of animal abuse by PhatKat · · Score: 1

      And I suggest you read the article:

      "Bonsaikitten.com is, of course, a joke devised by prankster MIT students -- who else would talk about "rectilinear kittens?" -- to provoke owners of kittens, an adorably fuzzy topic that's usually beyond parody."

      Just a though.

    4. Re:Evidence of animal abuse by HomerNet · · Score: 1

      Even if it isn't a real animal abuse site, there are losers out there that will try and do what the site suggests. And, BTW, bonsaisloth would have been hit just as hard.

      --
      I have no tag line
    5. Re:Evidence of animal abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is a parody, but the creators were ultimately too subtle for their own good. It will be interesting to see if this goes anywhere beyond the cover of some news sites, mit has a decent grasp of both electronic and traditional legalities regarding everyting from copyright law to freedom of speech. penman

  36. Re:Sigh... by AaronStJ · · Score: 1

    I know, I wasn't really clear about that... He is selling something, but they're not actually Klein bottles. Anyway, it's still a joke, in that it's obvious that the site is primarily intended to be humorous.

    All right, agreed with on all points. It was unclear from your first post whether or not you meant the entire site was a hoax (like bonzaikitten). But the site is obviously intended to be amusing, and I think it succeed. And the almost-klein-bottles are pretty cool. To bad they can't be embedded in this dimension, only immersed.

    --
    Stupid like a fox!
  37. I found my favorite line from that article... by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1
    "Why are they doing this?" asks Harvey Silverglate, a prominent Boston criminal defense attorney. "I think the answer is that political correctness has infected the FBI."

    Damn right. "Our FBI" can't even nab an elderly mob boss, and we're all paying for the FBI's mistakes. Forget about all the damned secrets, I want to know about the FBI's blunders, and I want to believe that they're trying to stop being so clumsy.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    1. Re:I found my favorite line from that article... by webweave · · Score: 1

      My favorite photo on the site is the one where a hand is using a shoe horn to get the cat into the bottle. I am still chuckling. Hope this does not lead to banning everything funny. Wait, thats not funny ;)...

    2. Re:I found my favorite line from that article... by NonSequor · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but I really hate animals. And to me, not mutilating animals is rather vulgar and obscene.


      "Homo sum: humani nil a me alienum puto"
      (I am a man: nothing human is alien to me)

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    3. Re:I found my favorite line from that article... by pallex · · Score: 1

      "Even the intimation of it is rather vulgar and obscene"

      I take issue with your choice of the word `is`. You should have said something like `appears to me to be` instead, which would have made clearer the impermanent and unimportant nature of your (anyones - not being rude) opinion.

    4. Re:I found my favorite line from that article... by HomerNet · · Score: 1
      You're right, the FBI shouldn't be getting their mits on this case. This is the kind of thing that the ASPCA handles. However, the mutilation of animals for any purpose is just
      • not funny!
      Even the intimation of it is rather vulgar and obscene.
      --
      I have no tag line
  38. Nothin' to see here, just a DCS1000 by ntsucks · · Score: 1

    Clever trick to hide it in a jungle of
    other model and product numbers.

    --
    Those who can do. Those who can't sue.
  39. Re:Offensive, but protected by rve · · Score: 1

    Don't do to a cat what your cat wouldn't do to you if you were mouse sized. Erm.. wait a minute...

  40. Well as long as the logic train derailed.... by Kibo · · Score: 1

    Can I hop on? Seriously, someone might shoe horn a kitten into an old mini coke bottle as a conversation piece, so let's ban satire?! When you go to a rave, always take your pills to Dance Safe, especially the green triangles, and never lick someone elses stickers. You should never accept drinks from someone you don't know well, especially waiters (I've seen Fight Club). It's one thing to object, as a matter of taste. And perhaps, "It's not for me, thanks" lacks impact. But web + alcohol + hyperbole != argument. The thing that sets you appart, aside from Justin Bailey, is that you admitited you're under the influence, which is commendable (down right Presidential). But what scares me is the other people with the same view point, what's their excuse? Just how many people in Appalachia read slashdot? I'm sure Bonsai Kitten isn't what Al Gore had in mind when he invented the internet, but it's funnier than black kids working minimum wage at McDonald's to subsidising rich, white, kids with their tax dollars. No, wait...yeah, Bonsai Kitten is funnier, but less ironic, that's it.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  41. Cruelty to Humans by jon_adair · · Score: 2

    If they go after these guys for encouraging cruelty to animals, I won't have faith in our justice system until they go after the producers of Hannibal for encouraging cruelty to humans.

  42. Re:Hey now... by elflord · · Score: 1
    The things sold are images under an immersion into R^3. So they are not the homeomorphic images of Klein bottles, no.

    BTW, you can embed a Klein bottle into spacetime -- 4 dimensions is sufficient, you can for example use the extra dimension to "wiggle" around the self-intersection.

  43. Re:Sigh... by Fervent · · Score: 3
    Kleinbottle.com is real. The structures that they sell aren't true klein bottles, but they're as close as you can come in three dimensions. Great gifts.

    Yes, nothing says to your girlfriend "your sexy" like giving her a Klein bottle for Valentine's Day.

    --------
    Carmack is an elitist, pseudonerd bastard.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

  44. Quantum Mechanic relation? by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 2

    This looks an awfully lot like all the sites that have tried Schrödinger's Cat Experiment. Explained here and tested over there.

    --
    [ ]
  45. Re:Once Again by elflord · · Score: 1
    I simply cannot believe that the FBI has subpoenaed this site.

    Because a lot of people have reported it and it looks like they may be breaking the law ? The real problem is not that the FBI is actually enforcing the law, it is that the law is dumb (in this case). Bans on depiction of cruelty to animals IMO should only apply to material where animals are (illegaly) harmed in the production. One of the problems with a blanket ban on "depiction of cruelty to animals" is that AFAICT, it would rule out depictions of instances of cruelty to animals that are protected by law (battery farms, vivisection, etc)

  46. Re:Offensive, but protected by TeknoMage · · Score: 1

    LAUGH, ya, I didn't change my type from code.

    If anybody who reads this has any pull at /.

    I suggest changing the default to something a
    little better then code.

  47. Re:Bullshit... by mj01nir · · Score: 1

    Damn. Banned after two hours. Oh well...

    --
    the no .sig .sig
  48. Conspiracy Theory by Kibo · · Score: 1
    The FBI tricked Mark Chumura into going to a post-High School Prom party. That's down right insidious!
    "Mr. Chumura, the All-pro Tight end of the Green Bay Packers, went over to complain about the noise, but the FBI entraped him into having sex with a seventeen year old girl. Mr. Chumura was later aquited of all charges, and hopes to resume his career with the XFL in 2002 as a player for the Miami Mayors." -- 2/9/01 Green Bay Value Market Shopper.
    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  49. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by ocelotbob · · Score: 2

    I think you're missing the point here. I, like most of the people here find it on the offensive side, and if in the right mood, would fire off an email stating just that opinion. However, in the case of this website, we're talking about a federal investigation into a site that is obviously doctored photographs which anyone with a copy of Photoshop/Gimp/etc. could throw together in a short period of time. I've found images that are much closer to being illegal on rotten.com than the site in question.

    --

    Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  50. Re:A joke? by ShaunC · · Score: 1

    >Just as an aside, I'm pretty sure that it's completely illegal
    >to ship firecrackers or other dangerous materials (explosives? hello!)
    >using the USPS, and I'm pretty sure the other transport companies
    >won't go near the place either.

    Well, it's illegal to grow pot, too, but there's no shortage of seedbanks out there who will be glad to mail anywhere in the world :) I've actually received several mailorder catalogs from a company called Glory Fireworks. I never ordered anything - I buy all my shit at the county line - but they were doing mailorder regardless.

    I just did a search and found a fireworks company who was willing to ship via USPS to anywhere except "AZ,CA,CT,DE,GA,MA,ME,MN,NJ,NY,PA,RI,VT." Apparently there's no federal (e.g. USPS) regulations on shipping fireworks... Must be up to each state to decide.

    Shaun

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  51. Re:Bullshit... by sweet+reason · · Score: 1

    BTW...I'm a vegan

    and i'm from arcturus.

    anyway, do you torture the plants as you kill and eat them?
    do you even know how to give them a quick, merciful death?

    --
    Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- A.E.
  52. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by Schnedt+McWhatever · · Score: 1

    You might want to consider that some of us think beyond 'trolls' and little adventures in fake-fraud on message bases.

    People who run around talking about 'trolls' might be the ones in need of a bit more active life.

  53. Re:My Cats will bloody well climb into anything... by TandyMasterControl · · Score: 1

    dood, is that a Radiohead lyric line you got there as your sig?

    --
    Johnny Quest has two Daddies.
  54. Re:Why I Detest BonsaiKitten by Shelrem · · Score: 1

    Ummm, you have a score of zero because you're an anonymous coward. I don't think that does speak volumes of Slashdot, other than that we get a lot of AC trolls around here. I wonder if this was one.

    -ben.c

  55. Re:My Cats will bloody well climb into anything... by rprycem · · Score: 1

    Dawnism hard at work

  56. I Begrudglingly Admit.... by VB · · Score: 1

    I'm a cat person. I hate to admit it, but, permanent chicks suck, dogs are forbidden from apartments, roommates are a pain-in-the ass, and parents are great, but, you shouldn't live with them. I thought when Sox died at 15 after being hit by a car and leading a very disturbing garbage-picking life, I was done with them for good. I wasn't a cat person. Couldn't have been more wrong. I hate cats, but, had I not taken Sox in, our cars would have had a lot more pigeon shit on them.

    I used to make the office-chicks change their cat-screensavers when I was an administrator at a gov't agency, 'cause they bugged me. Of course, two of these had 13 and 8 (respectively) of these vile little creatures at home, since men found them (the office cows, not cats) so offensive. Again, it wasn't the fault of the cats. It's just that they (the chicks) couldn't stay in a male's presence with his approval for longer than 5 seconds and needed some companionship.

    When my latest cat was thrust into a bar and hazed and abused by its patrons a close friend of mine's wife took pity on the poor beast and, since they already had 3, felt I should be compelled to take her in. What the hell, I figured. It was a cute little monster, and, I'd had 3, or 4 beers, and felt the 20 - 25 bucks a month on cat food and litter couldn't be too much of a burden. Then, the little bastard educated me as to how much fun she could have trying to guess the passwords on my computers' xscreensavers, and, there was that one day she unplugged the main extension chord to the UPS and I had to rush home after the pager went off only to find her batting around a dead mouse next to an orange extension chord plug that looked strangely as if it had once been plugged into an outlet lying fairly close to it. Strange how cats can teach you new tricks. I learned she wasn't strong enough to pry an AS-400 away from the wall from whence it wedged an extension chord plug securely into an outlet.

    Yup, hate, the little monster, but, Tux (my bastard cat, not the penguin), probably spends her days surfing kitty-porn and morally damaging sites like this one, all-the-while filling carnivore logs with my RemoteAddr when she's not rebooting my Linux and BSD boxes, as I slave away on my day job earning the loot to finance that cat food she needs laying around to supplement her diet of mice.

    Just hope she's got a plan B, when the Feds knock on the door to take me in for surfing kitty-porn.


    Linux rocks!!! www.dedserius.com

    --
    www.dedserius.com
    VB != VisualBasic
  57. OT: Trolling and Trolling development. by Kibo · · Score: 1

    Now I'm no expert. But trolls are at least as old as bridges and billy goats. It's been said that the first email was a test, and the second a flame, but on closer examination, the first was acctually a troll. People have been trolling since before they used the web for porn, and back when all anime came from ftp.cdrom.com. '/.' doesn't even have very good trolls, unless you're a troll (but I'm an easy fish to catch). I don't see any ask slashdot's about why there are no shadows in space for Christ's sake.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  58. Re:Sigh... by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 1

    Not only does Stoll sell klein bottles, he has absurdly good QA. And yes, they make good gifts, provided you know the right person. My girlfriend is studying pure math (ie the totally useless kind :) ), so this was perfect.

  59. Re:Sigh... by mattbee · · Score: 2

    Er, since I'm addressing the humor-impaired, I should probably point out that http://www.kleinbottle.com is a joke as well.

    No it's not, A friend ordered one from them and he's drunk beer out of it! It comes with a couple of sides of A4 about what to do if you're exporting it into any universe which has more or less than three dimensions (consult a registered quantum mechanic etc.).

    --
    Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
  60. Issue Take-out, and Schrodingers Cat by Kibo · · Score: 1

    A. If the world must be made safe enough for the stupidest of us, then let's shut down Space Watch cause I welcome the Apocalypse.
    B. Schrodinger's Cat is a cruel thought experiment that encoureges the abuse of cats via vial smashers, cyanide, and unspecified radioactive isotopes. So all textbooks, conference papers and other information reguarding this and similar inhumane thought experiments should be destroyed. Never mind that in the near century since this experiment has been posed not one cat has been both alive and dead in the presence of a vial smasher.
    C. Idiot's don't need encouregment. Encouregment mearly adds direction to what would otherwise be directionless and equally entertaining.
    D. "Don't believe everything you read." -- Dad. Or "You're eyes can deceive you. Don't trust them." --Alec Guiness

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    1. Re:Issue Take-out, and Schrodingers Cat by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      D. "Don't believe everything you read." -- Dad. Or "You're eyes can deceive you. Don't trust them." --Alec Guiness
      You forgot:

      E. There is a sucker born every minute. -- P.T. Barnum.
      --
      You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
  61. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 1

    And oddly enough rotten.com is hosting the bonsai kitten site, since it kept getting shut down by its previous hosts.

  62. No joke but political activism by Bastiaan · · Score: 1

    Everyone seems to consider this stuff to be either a joke or real. But in my opinion this site may be well a very good political statement against animal cruelty. It very sublty but convincingly demonstrates the hypocrisy of many so called animal lovers that want to censor this site but at the same think artificicially breeded perversions like hairless cats are cute. Apparently breeding cats without tails or dogs with heads so small there eyes allmost pop out is less cruel than even mentioning putting kittens in a jar.
    This site clearly holds up mirror to society. Therefore it is and should be protected as free speech.

  63. I, too, am a cat person by Bastian · · Score: 2

    and I think this site is fucking hilarious. In the 19 years on this earth I have grown enough to know when someone is making a joke for the sake of how ridiculous it is, and I can laugh.
    Part of me hopes the site is a commentary on how pet lovers really do raise their pets. . . but the humor is a little to unsophisticated for that.

  64. Re:Offensive, but protected by TeknoMage · · Score: 2

    SURE! And tux being sodomized by the freeBSD
    daemon(demon?).

    Thats the point, right there, in a nutshell.

    In this country (and I speak of the us here.)
    Free speach is legal. Censor one thing, and you
    quickly open a flood gate of other possible
    things to censor. Including you.

    So before people start to get uptight about this
    realize, that your views my be eccentric and
    offensive to somebody else. Of course,
    unless your a tapocia head in 451F.

    If that ever happens to me, somebody, please,
    shoot me, for to be tamed, is to be dead.

  65. Re:Bullshit... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

    I place this site as having about the same amount of realism as the movie "Hannibal". Yes the images are disturbing however, it's obvious to anyone with an IQ of over, say, room temperature, that the images are fake. As I and many others have said before, if these were real images we'd be joining you in being up at arms, however, these are fake images which can serve perspective as to where we're going and where we've been.

    --

    Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  66. Re:A joke? by Skyhawk_Dreamer · · Score: 1

    Satire, not parody. Satire can be funny, or not. Swift's "A Modest Proposal" was given in a rather serious tone without any disclaimers. Did you really think that cooking and eating babies was the message there?

    But I seriously question the intellectual capacity of those who look at the Bonsai site and honestly believe the US Government issues kitticulture permits in order to allow people to stuff kittens into Klein bottles with a shoehorn. You *do* know what a Klein bottle is don't you?

    You know that poor cat who gets choked to death by his own intestine and cut into pieces on a TV show called the "Simpsons"? That's called satire too. Bet you can't figure out what the message is there either.

    They really must be putting something very bad in the water lately... this is proof.

    Sheesh

  67. The truth is stranger than fiction... by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    Freerifle may be a joke, but had you ever heard of the US Army's "Office of Civilian Marksmanship"?
    I heard that at one time, they were giving away surplus M1 Garand rifles.
    Now they charge $165 - One per citizen over 18, if you are in a marksmanship program and have no criminal record...
    It's an old program designed to ensure that the government can raise a straight-shooting militia, should the need arise.
    Cheers,
    Jim in Tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:The truth is stranger than fiction... by IronChef · · Score: 1


      Yeah, I have heard of it. I think it is actually called the "Directorate of Civilian Marksmanship," or something similar -- the acronym is definitely DCM. I have friends who do the matches.

      To qualify for a rifle you have to participate in a few DCM matches. Once that is done, your Garand is just a couple hundred bucks or so. Sometimes you get luckyand receive one still in the cosmoline.

      I am amazed that the DCM lived throught the dark Clinton years.

  68. Re:That was one strange site. by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2

    www.cat-scan.com

    It's hilarious. If you look at the scans, the majority of the cats just seem confused as to why they are sitting on a piece of glass. Most calm cats will stay wherever you put them for at least a few seconds, they they will leave if they wish. I don't think it's that cruel. I think some people go a little overboard, but people have been cruel to animals for ages, I don't think that websites like this are promoting anything new. At least they don't have pictures of two cats tied to eachother by the tail and thrown over a clothesline. That was the worst thing I saw as a kid.

  69. Re:Joke? Yeah� Is it obvious to everyone? No by torinth · · Score: 1

    2 The stupidity of the audience doesn't impose restrictions on free speach© When the first admendment says "congress shall make no law © © ©" That means NO LAW©

    I never said there needed to be, or is there, a law© I said that people need to take personal responsibility when excersing their right to free speech, to be sure that it doesn't infringe unfairly upon anyones one fundamental right of the US Constitution:

    To allow citizens: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness©

    Disclaimers on inflammatory jokes is no different than ratings for music, movies, tv, and games© None of these are required by law© It's a responsibility that big, scary, corporate america ¥or in this case, site operators take on in order to protect the individual©

    -Andrew

  70. Re:Offensive, but protected by Skyfire · · Score: 1

    Bonzaihuman!

    --
    Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
  71. you gotta remember by Bastian · · Score: 2

    The people who are calling for this site to be taken down are the same people who call for the Green Bay Packers to change their name because it is cruel to animals.

  72. Re:Guestbook fun by Fist+Prost · · Score: 1

    That's the esteemed Professor Loof Lipra. Try holding a mirror up to your monitor and re-reading this post if you still don't get it.

    --
    Tsorp Tsif

    Fist Prost

    "We're talking about a planet of helpdesks."

    --

    Fist Prost

    "We're talking about a planet of helpdesks."
    -Jaron Lanier
  73. no disclaimer? by jesser · · Score: 2

    It sounds like the site owner could have put a "this is a joke" disclaimer at the bottom of the page, but didn't because he wanted to read enraged responses and laugh at the senders. That's not very ethical by my standards -- especially when the content of the site might lead someone to hurt cats, or even if a it would lead a cat-lover to *think* that someone might hurt cats after seeing the site. Plenty of web surfers wouldn't be tipped off by "rectilinear" or "klein bottle" and immediately figure out that the site is a joke.

    I haven't actually seen the website -- I'm just going by the linked articles, so I could be wrong about the facts. (Also, for now, I'll stay out of the debate over whether it was right for the FBI to shut down the site.)

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
    1. Re:no disclaimer? by Demona · · Score: 1

      How about "ethical" in the sense that nobody should put a disclaimer on ANYTHING? Lawyers tell us to. That's a good reason not to. I say get rid of all disclaimers, warning labels and the like, and the world (except for the lawyers) will be a much happier place.

      --
      Fuck Slashdot
  74. Freedom of Speech by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

    Freedom of speech apparently doesn't apply to some topics.

    Right. And as soon as you forget your starry-eyed idealism, you'll probably accept it.

    I'm really getting sick of Slashdot for this very reason. This is absolutely correct - freedom of speech does not apply to all topics. You can't lawfully plot the assassination of the president, you can't lawfully say or write damaging things about people that you know are false, you can't lawfully sell a canned soda drink and call it Coca Cola, etc., etc.

    Some restriction is necessary to keep our economy running smoothly, to keep some semblance of order, and to keep things fair and just.

    I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death, blah, blah, blah... Don't make me ill. I'd never defend to the death the right of someone put up a web site about squishing kittens into Mason jars - my family is too important to me to do that.

    Don't get me wrong - freedom of speech is the best default for making a judgment on what is lawful to say. But you know what? I have a favorite limitation on free speech - an overriding principle. The Supreme Court of the United States said it in their judgment on Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629: "the parents' claim to authority in their own household to direct the rearing of their children is basic in the structure of our society." They were saying that New York was not at fault for making criminal the selling of pornographic material to minors.

    Just some stuff for you starry-eyed idealists to think about.

    --
    I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    1. Re:Freedom of Speech by TeslaHz · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. I am currently seeking people to overthrow the government of the us and return it to the people of the country. want to help?

  75. Bah! by Fist+Prost · · Score: 3

    Here's one that's already ready already:
    Squirrel Fishing.

    Fist Prost

    "We're talking about a planet of helpdesks."

    --

    Fist Prost

    "We're talking about a planet of helpdesks."
    -Jaron Lanier
  76. Re:Hypocrites, all... by Fortyseven · · Score: 1
    Indeed. People say that we should ban shows like that MTV one the moronic now-crispy kid emulated. Or Bonsai Kitten. But I ask them, how often have brutal, horrific stories been on the evening news? Almost every night there's some shooting or stabbing, or whatnot, and they get into it describing what happened. Can they say that no one ever got an idea from the TV news? What about those Columbine copycats that sprung up afterwards?

    Yeah, I guess I'm pretty damned tired of humans...we're a bunch of morons. God I hope we never meet another alien race. I'd be so embarassed. :P

  77. Allanach loves kittens .. may well hate Jews by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1


    When asked whether someone has the First Amendment right to advocate for animal cruelty, Allanach replied: "That's a great question. That's at the heart of a lot of debate."

    Perhaps she could have continued ... "I mean ... I know it's O.K. to speak for genecide of a whole human race, like the Jews ... but kittens ... well I think that's still debateable."

    Note: I am a very big believer in protecting the rights of animals, as well as humans ... but let's be serious ... or perhaps not so serious!

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  78. I hope Carnivore reads this!!!!!! by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 1
    Sent to BonsaiKitty.com:

    Dear Bonsai Kitty...

    I've had my Bonsai Kitty for 6 weeks now and I couldn't be a more satisfied customer. I have had two dinner parties since receiving my "B-Kitty" and have proudly featured it as the centerpiece on my dinner table! It is just amazing how I have become the envy of all my friends and associates!

    I do have a couple of Kitty-care tips to share but I did not see a spot on your website where I could post them, so I am just going to include them here so you can post them whenever you get around to creating your "Bonsai-Kitty Kare Korner" section.

    Tip 1. Unwelcome Nocturnal Meewing
    This seems to happen more and more as your B-Kitty gets older and the best way I have found to deal with this little problem is to drape the Kitty-Jar with two heavy, thick moving blankets just around sundown. I'm pretty sure that the darkness calms the B-Kitty and lulls it into a peaceful night of slumber.

    Tip 2. Fogging in the Kitty-Jar
    This happens when you keep the ambient room temperature too low for your Bonsai-Kitty. I've been keeping the thermostat at about 97 degrees F. in the room where I keep my B-Kitty and I think the problem is pretty much licked now.

    Tip 3. Clawing Sounds.
    These little noises may be cute but they can be distracting while discussing the latest DotCom failures over dinner. I solved this problem by applying a little petroleum jelly on the end of a slightly bent coat hanger and, inserting it throught the 1/4 inch air hole, apply a dab or two to the inside of the Kitty-Jar just under the Kitty's little foot pads! Works like a charm!

    Thank you again Bonsai-Kitty for all of the delightful conversations that have been sparked by my new B-Kitty. My mother-in-law seemed very envious (and her birthday is just around the corner), so be expecting a new order from me soon!

    Thanks again for a wonderful product!

    Sincerely,
    Alan K. McSwain


    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  79. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by mj01nir · · Score: 1

    Bonsai cats? Not offensive. In fact it's fucking hilarious. Especially if you're a cat owner. I've watched my cats stick their heads into various cups, bags, boxes, and vessels more times than I can count. That site almost could be made by simply lying various containers on the floor and just waiting for your cats to get curious.

    Carnivore? Now *that's* offensive.

    --
    the no .sig .sig
  80. this is truely scary by davonds · · Score: 1

    In December 1999, President Clinton signed a law that makes it a federal felony to possess "a depiction of animal cruelty" with the intent to distribute across state lines.

    does this mean it is illegal for me to post copies of the picture of LBJ carrying his dog by ears on the internet (even assuming I had obtained permission from the copyright holder)? as I read this, the distributers of "Appocolypse Now", "Gremlins", "Something About Mary", just about any Warner Bros cartoon (as well as thousands of other films and cartoons), the networks that broadcast them, PETA (all those anti seal clubbing informercials), and endless news agencies are in violation of the law. What happened to freedom of speach? this law needs to be contested and struck down now as unconstitutional.

  81. Re:Let's get this straight by shuffler · · Score: 1

    An eagle has a left wing and a right wing, but they're just for flapping. The bird brain is in the middle.

  82. Re:la la la by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

    Well, that is one of the definitions of art!

    Seriously, a display that evokes varied and strong responses in people, especially if it makes people challenge and perhaps re-evaluate their values, is ART! The debate on Slashdot, the wired articles, and the fact that the FBI had to be involved are all suggesting that this website is a beautiful work of art! I think the designer should recieve an award!

    I think the only real concern anyone has is that dumb people will stuff their cats into bottles after seeing this page. Much like how some dumb kid burnt his penis when he stuck it into a freshly baked apple pie... I say we give these people every chance to remove themselves from the gene pool. Stupid people breed too much.

    Bleh, I'm done here...

  83. Re:The Right Wing America has won people. by el_chicano · · Score: 1
    if bonsaikitty.com is ilegal it's because of a bill that Clinton passed.
    You mean that a Republican-controlled Congress passed and President Clinton signed into law...
    You'd be suprised how many republicans I know that the only place they get their news is Rush Limbaugh, the same goes for democrats, many get all their news from democratic sources ONLY.
    What Democratic sources? You list Rush Limburger by name because he is everyone's favorite right-wing crank Just once I would like someone to list the LIBERAL news sources so that I can go read them!
    --
    You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  84. Re:Bullshit... by MrGrendel · · Score: 3
    These people certainly have the right to post whatever they want on the web, regardless of its poor taste, so long as there is no real animal cruelty going on (I suspect there isn't). This isn't really a matter of offending people, though, and they aren't being investigated for simply being offensive. I'm guessing that many of the people who think this site is funny think so because it is outrageous to the point of being unrealistic. Unfortunately, many of us have personal experience with people who have actually done outrageous things like this to animals. When you know people who would take this kind of site seriously, but think it's a clever idea for a new method of torture rather than offensive, then this isn't quite so funny. It also isn't obvious that this is a complete fabrication rather than sick people bragging and joking about their animal torture exploits.

    I grew up in a small town where people didn't just make off-color jokes about flaming cats being thrown off bridges, some of them had really done it. Two guys who had dowsed a cat in gasoline, lit it on fire, and threw it off a 300 foot bridge were caught (they bragged in public) and eventually sentenced to 6 months (the max). Two years later they were both convicted for murder after breaking into a farm house and raping, torturing (for over a day), and killing the occupants. I knew people who bragged about beating cats in burlap bags with baseball bats. A friend had a cat that returned home one night with a plastic bag over its head, tied at the neck. It was hacking up blood and died on the way to the vet. The people responsible for that also thought it was pretty funny and got quite a few laughs out of it. People like this really would try to grow a cat in a jar if they were a little more creative.

    Now, after that rant, let me say it again: if this is just a joke, they have every right to offend me with it. I don't have to look. But it is not at all obvious to me that this is entirely a joke, and for that reason it warrants investigation.

  85. The FBI made a medium mistake by tazaleth · · Score: 1

    LOL... I haven't even looked at the site, and I personally do not care what is on it. The mere fact that the FBI is after MIT students, who are trying trying to make a prank is absurd. Obviously the students knew that everyone would get mad, but the point was just to see what would happen. I guess there truly is no free speech in this world any more. Personally, I hope this makes the hackers made, because the FBI are the people who deserve to suffer for this. They have made fools of themselves. If the FBI is reading this, enjoy... I have nothing against you, but trying to go after stupid MIT pranksters is a waste of my tax dollars. If anything, go after those pro-no-speech people...

    --
    "And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free." - "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean NOT
  86. Andy Kaufman would be proud by Avatar- · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the fuss people made over his wrestling act. The knee-jerkers just couldn't wrap their mind around the possibility that he was just trying to get their goat. Studios used to try to get him to tell everybody his impromptu antics were "just a joke", much like these people rabidly insist that Bonzai Kitten nicely let everybody know it's not for real. It's sad that War of the Worlds style radio shows are illegal these days (you have to clearly identify such fare as being fictional).

    --
    -*Avatar*-
  87. Godwin's law! by fatphil · · Score: 1

    What do I win?
    -- Real Men Don't Use Porn. -- Morality In Media Billboards

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  88. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by HiggsBoson · · Score: 1

    Why's that? They simply had the temerity to strongly disagreee with a particular idea or point of view. In this case, yours :)

    --
    See Sig append. Append Sig, append. Good Sig.
  89. Re:Sigh... by MattHawk · · Score: 2

    He sells items very close to klein bottles. [Note - To understand explaination, please take a look at http://www.geom.umn.edu/zoo/toptype/klein/standard /stills.html. It gives a good view of a klein bottle's general shape] The difference is that there is a hole in the glass klein bottles where the handle part reaches the body part of the bottle. In a true klein bottle, not such hole exists, and this is the reason a true klein bottle is impossible - The handle and the body of the bodle must intersect but not touch each other, meaning that a true klein bottle must enter a fourth dimension in order to correctly form this section of the bottle.

  90. Klien bottle? by DzugZug · · Score: 2
    Count the FBI among the many visitors to bonsaikitten.com who are anything but amused at the descriptions of how to use muscle relaxant, feeding tubes and Klein bottles to shape a perfect Bonsai Cat.

    You think anyone at the FBI knows what a Klien bottle is?

    1. Re:Klien bottle? by BarefootClown · · Score: 1

      There's only one kind of bottle that anybody at the FBI knows, and they're all drinking out of it.

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    2. Re:Klien bottle? by Pakaran2 · · Score: 1

      The other point that needs to be made here is that it's impossible to actually construct a Klein bottle - only a model of one, which won't pass through itself cleanly (without a hole).

      As such, I find it hard to see how these people could actually go about being arrested for putting an animal into a bottle that doesn't exist!

  91. Re:modest proposal by Skyhawk_Dreamer · · Score: 1

    I have some violations to report! The movie "Apocalypse Now" is one. That oxen or cow or whatever sure had the anvil falling toward it. We got to see it being sliced up. And it was *real*, or is using real images of abuse not included in such legislation? Is Francis Coppola still in jail? The movie "Braveheart" is another. They profited from all those abusive images of spearing poor horses. That one wasn't real. So Mel Gibson must obviously be in jail right? The TV cartoon the "Simpsons" is one more. Here a cat is repeatedly depicted as being sliced up by power tools, getting blown up, and being hung to death by its own intestine. And some parents let their kids watch it. I bet that mouse is in jail! And I can guarentee that they are profiting from this activity! Oh, perhaps the legislation doesn't cover media, TV movies, books, art, etc. but only the Internet or satire on the Internet? Ahhh... yes perhaps that's it. Perhaps someone can explain this in more detail.

  92. Re:DCS1000 is already a trademark! by webweave · · Score: 2

    INTEGRATED SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT, INC. of Michigan ownes the trade mark. Can they sue the FBI?

  93. Why animal activists and others fear this site. by Anemophilous+Coward · · Score: 2
    I think that the reason people fear this site, isnt so much what it depicts towards animals, but rather what it says about human nature.

    The vast majority of people nowadays go about their daily routine ignoring and repressing most of their inner feelings and thoughts. Mostly due to societial/religious conditioning to keep those 'bad thoughts' out of their heads.

    Along comes this site and people freak out...how could a 'human' do such a thing?? Worse still, how could a human even have a 'thought' like this?? Having been so conditioned to not even question that they themselves might have a 'dark-side'. There is no way they could ever conceive such a notion in their mind let alone do it.

    Unfortunately the truth of the matter is (as most readers here know), we (humans) ARE capable of thinking and doing this sort of thing (...and worse). Of course thinking and acting on those thoughts are quite different. More people need to understand their own dark and violent nature to be able to control it and laugh at the cruel joke of it all.

    The scary people out there are the ones who deny acknowledging their dark nature and then one day have it creep up and overtake them. Those are the people that would actually go and glue their cats anus shut and stuff them into a bottle. And later, after they are being hauled off to jail (or whatever), they are going "I don't know why I did it...". Neighbors saying "He seemed like such a nice person...".

    More satire at our perverse nature wont desensitize us, it will allows us to better understand ourselves and lead more productive lives.

    And for any trolls here from the humane society, sheesh read the sentence about them having a US government approved license for this...that should tip you to the joke of it all.

    -not your normal AC

    1. Re:Why animal activists and others fear this site. by brassman · · Score: 1

      The Most Disturbing Thing(tm) I ever saw in New York City was an honest-to-deity ASPCA ambulance, complete with red lights and siren. Considering how often ambulances taking human beings to the hospital have accidents, the idea of someone running red lights to take Fido to the vet makes me ill.

      Maybe this is one step toward putting a stop to that.

      --
      "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
  94. Re:Bullshit... by TandyMasterControl · · Score: 1
    Simple enough huh? No civilization should condone cruelty against animals, if ti does then its not civilized.

    Wot? You mean like breeding them, raising them in pens and coops for the sole purpose of killing them, devouring their corpses, flesh and organs, and walking about in their skin and fur? Thankfully we are beyond barbarity like that, eh?

    --
    Johnny Quest has two Daddies.
  95. Re:Why I Detest BonsaiKitten by /dev/zero · · Score: 1
    If you go around saying "Kill Cops Kill Cops" and then ...wow amazingly... some half-wit kills a cop because you said that, you should accept the fact that you are responsible. That cops death was instigated by your speach. Furthermore, I think the courts should also hold you as liable. Because you are. You are not being cesored. You can say what you want. However if what you say leads to ramifications such as that, then you should face the consequences.

    Actually, if you put it to a beat, you stand a good chance to get a lucrative contract with Time-Warner.

    It increasingly seems that freedom of speech in the US depends upon who is doing the speaking...

    And don't forget, individuals are responsible for their own actions.

    --

    He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.
    -- J.R.R. Tolkien
  96. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by cicho · · Score: 1

    Fine. But you don't have the right not to be offended. Nobody has.

    --
    "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
  97. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by cicho · · Score: 1

    Huh? What's FBI's role in "encouraging people to rethink" their taste or talent?

    --
    "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
  98. Re:A joke? by cicho · · Score: 1

    >Would it really have hurt them to put
    >a "this is a parody" disclaimer
    >at the bottom of the site?

    And what good would it be? Assume a sicko out there who visits the site and actually decides to try it for real. Exactly how effective would a disclaimer be in stopping him?

    --
    "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
  99. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by el_chicano · · Score: 1
    my point was that if it looks real, then it is legitimately the subject of an investigation into cruelty
    Taking your argument to the next level, since many of the shootings and murders depicted on TV shows and movies shot by the Hollywood studios sure do look real, then by your "logic" the FBI/state cops/local cops should have legitimate reasons to investigate them for murder!!!
    --
    You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  100. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by Tassach · · Score: 1
    Having a dozen jackbooted thugs drag you out of bed at gunpoint and confiscate all your worldly possessions is certianly a cause for some introspection.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  101. Re:Bullshit... by hawk · · Score: 2

    > Why should humor have to be clearly labeled as
    such?
    A few years ago (96?) I referred to my Cat's
    Death Stout on rec.crafts.brewing, not a place
    noted for the humor-impaird. Particularly, I
    mentioned that it had been a double-batch, but
    that my cat had knocked the airlock out of one of
    the bottles, leaving it open to infection.

    Sone responded with a rather rabid message,
    concluding that he hoped I choked to death on the
    fur.
    I started sending a caustic response, but thought
    better of it. Sure enough, many others did,
    pointing out that any idiot should have been able
    to recognize I wasn't serious. [after all, it
    wasn't like he ruined *both* carboys :) ]

    hawk

  102. 1000? by SEWilco · · Score: 2

    DCS1000? Why, did they have a Y2K naming failure and DCS2000 rolled over to DCS1000? What kind of customer marketing decided on a 000 prefix? We should get better products from our government money. (Of course, I also don't appreciate the expense of their having to change all those Carnivor business cards, letterhead, pamphlets, and billboards)

    1. Re:1000? by b0r1s · · Score: 1

      not that its entirely important... but your line should be...
      What kind of customer marketing decided on a 000 suffix


      --
      Mooniacs for iOS and Android
  103. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

    But you do have the *choice* to not be offended. If you get offended, that is your choice. To believe otherwise is bad faith.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  104. then this is prehistory :) by hawk · · Score: 2

    heck, in 1984, there were something like 30 universal newsgroups--seems to me that they wouldn't quite fit on one screen, but didn't need two.

    And you could read the days newsfeed in about two hours (yes, my consulting at the time had some *very* boring tasks that left me sitting in front of machines for a long time waiting to change disks).

    1. Re:then this is prehistory :) by hawk · · Score: 2

      4. I no longer have to sit and change floppy disks for pointless multi-capacity read-write tests, leaving me near my vt100 with nothing else to do for two hours.
      I doubt that anyone could read the entire days newsfeed in 24 hours these days . . .

      There were sequences of tests that they wanted run, reformatting disks
      in a variety of capacities. I explained to them why they would never
      find the actual comaptibility probles which *could* come up this way, and
      got the response that "XXX has put a lot of time into this, and we're
      going to keep the test the way she set it up." Yes, someone with an
      english degree decided upon a procedure to test drive formatting,
      and her electrical engineer manager who actually knew about the
      magnetic problems involved (the erase head on the 720kb floppies was
      narrower than the write head on the 360kb floppies) wouldn't look
      at the problems.

      *shrug* It was their money, and i liked netnews . . .

      hawk

    2. Re:then this is prehistory :) by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

      heck, in 1984, there were something like 30 universal newsgroups--seems to me that they wouldn't quite fit on one screen, but didn't need two.

      And you could read the days newsfeed in about two hours (yes, my consulting at the time had some *very* boring tasks that left me sitting in front of machines for a long time waiting to change disks).

      Would you say that, since this time,

      1. disk speed and capacity have progressed more than the growth of USENET, thus making you unable to read the whole USENET feed in the time it takes to do the *very* boring tasks ?
      2. disk speed and capacity have progressed less than the growth of USENET, thus making you unable to read the whole USENET feed in the time it takes to do the *very* boring tasks ?
      3. disk speed and capacity have progressed the same as the growth of USENET, thus being able to read the whole USENET feed in the time it takes to do the *very* boring tasks ?

      --

  105. Virtual Animal Cruelty by Fjord · · Score: 2

    I see a parallel to the ./ article earlier on virtual child pornography. People often claim that there is no slippery slope, but this is it in action. This is then next thing that they take our rights away from. And then it's another, and another, and another.

    --
    -no broken link
  106. My Cats will bloody well climb into anything... by Bonker · · Score: 4

    Jeez... anybody with cats know that they'll get into any container, no matter how big, just to see what's inside!

    Why do you think there's such a problem with people accidentally killing their pets by locking them in the fridge or the dryer?

    This is a funny site, that pokes much needed fun at breeders and collectors alike. If you *don't* get it and think this guy needs to be punished, then you have obviously never owned a cat.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:My Cats will bloody well climb into anything... by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      I'm a big fan of cats and I think it's hilarious. Are any cats harmed? No. So it's just a bunch of students behaving like, well a bunch of students.
      In related news the US Government outlaws humour as being 'inappropriate to the dignity of the last superpower'.

    2. Re:My Cats will bloody well climb into anything... by StarTux · · Score: 1

      I have cats and still do not find it funny. Yes they do like to hide in things, but come on now, its still sick.

    3. Re:My Cats will bloody well climb into anything... by TandyMasterControl · · Score: 3
      I don't think the guy "needs to be punished" but I am sort of glad that the FBI would take this seriously as a interstate crime if real. I went to the site having seen a link to it through eightball (or something) I cringed, I felt nauseous and I realized- after a while of reading- that it had to be a joke. Hopefully. 99% positive. And though it continue(s,d) to disturb the hell out of me, I resolved not to lose any sleep over it. That's the end of it. For me.
      But that's not the way the FBI works. They made the usual inquiries about the website's operator just doing their job even though I am sure the investigators had already arrived at a conclusion that this was a hoax and that no real conspiracy to harm animals existed. But that isn't the end of their interest, because although the MIT student was not serious about this horrible "practice" some of the people coming to the site were. The FBI would be interested in people who seriously requested more information from Bonsaikitten, Inc. on the "product". Such people may be just following a joke out a little further than the average person, or they may themselves be engaged in real interstate traffic in controlled animals, illegal animal products, or mistreated animals.
      And if so I want them caught and punished.
      Of course there is always an On the Other Hand to that - the FBI may become suspicious of people who are not mistreating animals but who are merely weird, the kind of person who might leave a prospectus or brochure for BonsaiKitten on their coffee table, the way someone might have a collection of Angola State Prison Rodeo Programs in their office. Not sick but just possessed of a sick sense of humor. And whatever associated weirdnesses they engage in, may fall under inordinate suspicion from the Bureau next year.
      Moreover, someone who asked for Bonsai kitten literature may not prove to be hurting animals at all, but they could be the kind of person -so Bureau logic could go- more likely to be involved in drug trade of the herbacious and hallucinatory kind, or more likely to be involved in kitty pr0n. By their online behavior they are self-selecting themselves for Jedgar's disproportionate scrutiny - just by visiting a "suspect site" and not fleeing in horror like good citizens. As the inventor of profiling methodology at the Hoover Institute for Inspecting People's Underwear used to explain: to identify arsonists you have local law enforcement take pictures of the crowds that show up at good-sized fires. The arsonists are the ones urinating in their pants or beating off with their hands in their pockets. They didn't start this fire perhaps, and maybe they've never started any dangerous fire yet, but they'll be the guys responsible for the next ones. No doubt using this method they will catch some arsonists and some kitty mistreaters. But some of the people identified here and now as future suspects of future crime in this way may actually just have been fishing for their keys, or were sprayed by the firetruck. These people could possibly suffer real consequences for crimes only imagined to have happened by the secret police.

      And yeah back to one of your points, many cat breeders need to be forced into mason jars themselves. I'd request more info on that!

      --
      Johnny Quest has two Daddies.
    4. Re:My Cats will bloody well climb into anything... by FUNMerlin · · Score: 1

      What did that have to do with anything?

      --
      "please could you stop the noise im tryin a get some REST? from all the unbornchikkenVoicesin my head?"
  107. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by el_chicano · · Score: 1
    Clean up your fucking grammar, learn how to make multiple sentances out of that fucked-up run on shit you just posted, further learn how to make paragraphs out of those sentances, and eventually, you might be easy to read.
    You do know it is spelled sentences? :->
    --
    You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  108. Re:Bullshit... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    Now, after that rant, let me say it again: if this is just a joke, they have every right to offend me with it. I don't have to look. But it is not at all obvious to me that this is entirely a joke, and for that reason it warrants investigation.

    By the FBI? Bullshit. The proper procedure for an investigation on this subject is for the FBI (if they're concerned) to contact local law enforcement where the individual lives. Then there should be a warrant issued, and ONE COP should knock on his door and say "I know this sounds lame, but the FBI was concerned that you might be putting cats in jars. Can I come in and see if you have any mason jars with cats in them?"

    This is simply another case of people trying to infringe upon freedom of speech - Or perhaps the head of the FBI is just a cat lover.


    --
    ALL YOUR KARMA ARE BELONG TO US

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  109. Every joke offends someone somewhere by horza · · Score: 1

    I don't think there is a joke in the world that doesn't offend someone somewhere. When we tell people jokes, we filter out from our mental joke jukebox anything we think they might find offensive. The first joke that comes to mind down the pub with my football mates probably isn't the first one I'd trot out to a new female employee to make her feel more relaxed.

    With the web being accessible to everyone that filter is no longer there and the onus is on the end user to "get it". Complaining on Slashdot that it's obviously a joke is unfortunately preaching to the converted. Most of us here are intelligent and have some formal education. Sadly out there are many that are more limited, with knee-jerk reaction so fast that makes you wonder if the impulse came from the brain at all. We can hardly complain though when the same power that allows the joke to reach so many is also used by its opponents to whip up hysteria and misinformation.

    People talk about disclaimers spoiling the deadpan nature but most deadpan material sits on satire news sites which is a disclaimer in itself. People can publish anything they like on the net, and jokes like this help to make people a little less credulous of the things they read. In an age when even journalists seem to have stopped checking their facts I can only see the existance of this web site as a good thing.

    There are some applications and pages that try and learn your sense of humour and deliver jokes appropriate to you. I used to run eLOL (RIP) which was very good. However, the things that make you laugh the hardest are the things that take you from surprise.

    Phillip.

  110. Re:Sigh... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    Anyway, it's still a joke, in that it's obvious that the site is primarily intended to be humorous.

    I disagree; The site is primarily intended to sell (three dimensionally immersed) klein bottles. In fact, I bought my girlfriend a klein bottle mug for her birthday - Gotta love geek girls.

    However, Cliff does have a great sense of humor, obviously. One of these days I'm going to have to drop by his pad and pick up another klein stein. (I wonder how having a lid would change its mathematics...)


    --
    ALL YOUR KARMA ARE BELONG TO US

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  111. Re:Bullshit... by Chasuk · · Score: 1

    Now, after that rant, let me say it again: if this is just a joke, they have every right to offend me with it. I don't have to look. But it is not at all obvious to me that this is entirely a joke, and for that reason it warrants investigation.

    I assume, MrGrendel, that you haven't looked, otherwise the satire would be obvious. I don't find the site humorous, but I do find it hilarious that adults who do not appear to be otherwise mentally defective are unable to recognize satire. No, I am not referring to you, as I don't think that you have actually examined the site. Still, I do wonder, seriously, whether adults who lack the ability to recognize satire are missing a chromosome or something. In my household, myself and my eldest daughter (she is 16) both have well developed senses of humor. My youngest daughter and my wife seem genetically incapable of recognizing sarcasm, satire, parody, etc., and are also the type of people who are constantly tricked into forwarding hoax e-mail.

  112. DCS1000 isn't a bad name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...but really, I think that PIMPBOT5000 would have been better.

  113. A bit of history - by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else remember the article in Wired - (May, 1994 - here)
    about the war between alt.tasteless and rec.pets.cats? Go read it.
    I love the line in the article where it says that usenet has 4,000 newsgroups - I remember seeing something like 25,000 in 1996, the last time I checked...

    Cheers, Jim in Tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  114. Re:Bullshit... by IronChef · · Score: 2
    This story really makes me worry that I'll get busted for freerifle.com.

    FreeRifle.com is obviously a joke, right? A witty (sort of) send-up of the idiotic companies we saw during the height of the internet business craze... Right?

    Now I'm seriously considering putting a disclaimer on the page, which will ruin the parody.

  115. Have you seen what cat breeders do? by Madwand · · Score: 1

    If you think the Bonsai Kitten site is offensive, just take a look at this poor excuse for a living creature. It's a walking dustmop! It can't possibly live in the wild - it was bred to be an incredibly stupid, docile animal, so that it will put up with being properly "taken care of" by the people who buy them.

    I spent a few years around the edge of the cat show/breeding scene, and it's just amazing what you see...

    1. Re:Have you seen what cat breeders do? by coach-r · · Score: 1

      It seems to be as bad, if not even worse, when looking at certain lizards. Annecdotally, only about 30 pairs of bearded dragons where brought out of Australia before their government banned their export. Thus, all the bearded dragons currently available in the trade descend back to a relatively small gene pool. It's even worse, when considering how much in-breeding must have happened to "create" morphs like the sandfire, or several of the albino types.

  116. I know what DCS really stands for... by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

    Dumbass Control System.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
  117. A Modest Proposal by Dlugar · · Score: 1

    I remember having to read that in my Freshman English class in college.

    I also remember when we came to class the next day, half the class somehow managed to think poor Jonathan Swift was serious.

    I don't think the government even needs to be secret about it any more. People are too stupid to care.


    Dlugar

    --
    Computer Go: Writing Software to Play the Ancient Game of Go
  118. Re:Offensive, but protected by bellings · · Score: 2

    Of course, this assumes that there is no actual cruelty occuring.

    Dude, have you seen the site? They put a kitten in a wide-mouth glass mason jar, and took a photo. In another photo, they've covered a full grown cat with a clear pyrex mixing bowl.

    Guess what? None of that is cruel. It's not even close. You can't hurt a kitten by putting it in a wide-mouth mason jar for the few seconds it takes to snap a photo. Hell, if you have a laid back kitten, or you've pumped it full of enough catnip before hand, the kitten probably won't even care.

    The cat under the pyrex bowl probably did care, of course -- after the photo was snapped, and the bowl taken off,the cat probably expressed its extreme displeasure by rolling over, or going to sleep on top of the refridgerator, or by sitting on the window sill for a while.

    Seriously, there's nothing on the site that indicates any kind of cruelty to anything. Putting a pyrex bowl over your cat for a few seconds is no more cruel to the cat than the cat is cruel to you by kneading your chest with its sharp pointy claws while you're trying to read the newspaper. The cat's certainly not hurt, and is at the worst slightly annoyed with you for a few minutes. Big deal. There's real stuff to be concerned about in the world.

    --
    Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
  119. My take on the bonsaikitten issue by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

    Well... I'm a cat fanatic, and so logically I _ought_ to be offended. But on the other hand, I find 'Dysfunctional Family Circus' hysterically funny, and that is at least as sick if not more so. Therefore, I am forced to accept that bonsaikitten.com is funny too- if melonheaded mutant children are funny, then so are cube-shaped kittens. ;)

    1. Re:My take on the bonsaikitten issue by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Though I gotta admit one thing: slashdotters in particular ought to be well aware by now how many people are FREAKING IDIOTS! How many of you work helpdesk, or struggle with management? Now, consider the complete idiots you've encountered. Do you figure they would throw a kitten violently to the floor because a web page told them it would bounce? You bet they would, because they are IDIOTS. And it's all very well their being idiots, but I don't see how the resulting kittens going 'splat' should be held responsible.

      So there _is_ an argument against running the bonsaikitten site in its current form, with no disclaimer- the argument that people are _such_ idiots that, guaranteed, some idiot is gonna try to bounce a kitten, and kill or maim it.

      And yeah, there are worse things that happen in the world, but why _bait_ idiots to be idiots? Most idiots don't come up with ideas _that_ bad on their own: they're baited into it as a joke. It's not good judgement to joke that way. All the talk about Klein bottles is one thing, as it's too difficult for an idiot to prepare the glassware and the obvious result is the idiot writes to BonsaiKitten and wants to buy a finished one. But the bouncing thing? Idiots are going to _do_ that, and that's a shame, and it's not necessary. I think there's even going to be a few idiots who keep trying harder and harder when it doesn't work. Idiots suck...

    2. Re:My take on the bonsaikitten issue by AoT · · Score: 1

      it does tell you not to try it at home. i think that counts as a disclaimer.

  120. DCS1000 by mduell · · Score: 2

    Great! Now they are using a CD coping service for reading people's email?

    Mark Duell

    1. Re:DCS1000 by Jebediah21 · · Score: 2

      A CD Coping service! Yes! Just what I need! There is no way I can cope with all my CD's right now.

      --

      Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
    2. Re:DCS1000 by Rix · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it stands for Digital Carnivore System to me...
      Cheers,

      Rick Kirkland

  121. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by asv108 · · Score: 1
    You hvae to know you're being ridiculous

    Typos coming from a guy with a metallica domain, that's really surprising! Honestly, I think the site is in really poor taste. The average Joe Schmoe would think it is real and I wouldn't be surprised if some idiot or kid actually tried to do it. I'm not saying we should censor the Internet so kiddies don't try bad things, but this site is a lame attempt at being humorous so I don't object to the FBI investigation. I don't think anyone should do time for this or anything, you can't arrest people for having poor taste, but maybe it would encourage people to rethink their parody and humor sites. This site should at least have a disclaimer or something the tells people its all in good fun.

  122. Jerks. by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

    You don't have the right not to be offended. You have the ability.
    ___

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  123. Re:A joke? by crucini · · Score: 2
    Would it really have hurt them to put a "this is a parody" disclaimer at the bottom of the site?

    Yes it would. It would have detracted from the fun. And why should they detract from the fun to pander to the less intelligent?
    If I had a "how to kill your neighbours" site and posted (faked) pictures, do you think I should get investigated?

    No, I don't. I think a criminal investigation should only be launched when there's actual evidence that a crime has been committed. In this case, a corpse or missing person.
    Maybe a we should consider people reporting crimes to 911 as just 'pranks' to?

    It's hardly the same. 911 is for reporting emergencies. The web is for fetching information from remote servers. No guarantees are made that the information is serious or accurate.
    Instead of putting a disclaimer on the web site, let's put a disclaimer in the web browsers. Dialog box: "Danger! You are entering the World Wide Web! You may be trolled or offended. Click 'Accept' to continue." I'm assuming that idiots don't use lynx.
  124. Re: The Klein bottle site is a joke?!? by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

    *sigh* I thought the Klein Stein would've been kind of a neat, geeky thing to own. Sure, since it's an object in three space it's not really a klein bottle, but who cares?

    After checking the site, and going to the order page, I don't think it's a joke. The ordering instructions are just the kind of cobbled together thing I'd expect out of a place like that. Thank goodness I'll be able to get my Klein Stein someday. :-)

  125. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

    I don't object to the FBI investigation. I don't think anyone should do time for this or anything, you can't arrest people for having poor taste, but maybe it would encourage people to rethink their parody and humor sites.

    You have got to be kidding me.

    Why should people "rethink" their parody and humor sites? And moreover, why should the federal law enforcement agency be the organization that prompts such rethinking?

    In what broken, perverse society is the propriety of parody determined by those being parodied?

    Precisely because crazy cat people (I love cats, but I am - apparently unlike some - not an idiot about it) are so offended by this and so unable to see it for what it is, it stands as an example of fine parody, a paragon of the art, and should be displayed far and wide. Schoolchildren should be shown this page when they're learning about forms of expression.

    Anyone who thinks that there is anyone out there who wants a cube-shaped cat needs a good long session with a humor therapist. It is precisely because of this modern disease - the absolute inability to exercise even the slightest amount of skepticism, to critically evaluate, to put aside sentiment and open one's eyes - that our culture is losing what faint traces of subtlety it once had. We are no longer allowed to make jokes, to poke fun, to invite someone to look at something a new way. Instead, we have to label our jokes with "This is a joke", run a laugh track behind them, and clear them with a phalanx of focus groups to ensure not a single person in the audience will feel that the joke's creator has for some inconceivable reason singled them out as a target.

    You make me sick. It is people like you who will destroy art, will reduce us inexorably to the lowest common denominator.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  126. Let's get this straight by vultureman · · Score: 1

    Even if rated Humorous

    It is the LEFT wing that is into Political Correctness. This includes animal rights and vegetarianism.

    As a gun-toting carnivore, I know my accusers by reputation and the pretty sight pictures they make.

    --

    Reality is just a clever Hack, and the Planck constant is the refresh rate.
  127. Reader Feedback by syntax · · Score: 1

    A lot more people have been suckered in by the guy than you'd think. http://www.mit.edu/~jayp/Public/kitten/ has a list of several of the pictures the guy has received in an attempt to justify the cuteness of the kittens, and a log of lots of messages the guy has been sent so far.

    1. Re:Reader Feedback by el_chicano · · Score: 1
      http://www.mit.edu/~jayp/Public/kitten/ has... a log of lots of messages the guy has been sent so far.
      One would think that the FBI would be working with INTERPOL to find out the identity of those Italian idiots who sent him the illegal DEATH THREATS instead of trying shut down his legal website...
      --
      You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
      --
      A man who wants nothing is invincible
    2. Re:Reader Feedback by sharlaon · · Score: 1

      apparently the owner has made the files disappear since this post...

  128. Re:modest proposal by Kinchie · · Score: 1

    Well this one hasn't been fought in court. IIRC, the main intent of this law was to eliminate the production and sale of "crush" videos--women in high heels mashing insects and mice. Sorry, don't have time to ferret out the appropriate URL's for y'all. __________________________

    --
    Protege Posterioram Tuam
  129. Klein Bottle by Kinchie · · Score: 1
    Someone with a bit more topographical knowledge please feel free to correct me BUT

    Since a Klein bottle is non-orientable, isn't everything outside of the Klein bottle inside it. (i.e. there is no outside)

    Which means of course that these guys are actually performing Kitten bonsai with Klein bottles if they own a kitten and a Klein bottle. But then, again, the existence of a Klein bottle means all cat owners have practiced Kitten bonsai--including those that belong to the humane society and the ASPCA!

    --
    Protege Posterioram Tuam
  130. The really remarkable thing about this by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 2
    The Larry Flynt - Jerry Falwell supreme court case preserved freedom of speech for the purposes of parody.

    bonsaikitten is too good of a parody, to the point where a person of average intelligence will not think it's a parody.

    Therefore, the protection of freedom of speech is limited in cases where the quality of the speech is too good.

    The conclusion that one must necessarily draw about this case, and many many others, is that the USA's focus is shifting: from one that necessarily protected certain freedoms, to one that only protects politically viable viewpoints.

    Can you think of anything more dangerous?

  131. Re:Who cares if it's a joke? by fluxrad · · Score: 1

    good lord young man.

    you win the prize for funniest post of the day. someone mod this up.


    FluX
    After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  132. Next We'll See... by Bilbo · · Score: 1
    Uh, what can we come up with for our next halarious act? Perhaps a "parody" site on Bonsi Queers - How to bend, fold and mutilate your friendly neighborhood queer so that he'll turn out straight! Gee, THAT would be really funny!! And surely, since "it's only a joke," we know it should be protected by our First Ammendment Rights!

    Yea, right.

    At what point does "humor" cease to be humorous?

    --

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  133. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by pallex · · Score: 1

    They do - only they only investigate black people (nwa, dr dre etc) and not Clint Eastwood, Sly Stallone etc.

  134. The Right Wing America has won people. by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 3

    Now the government wants to prevent you from watching pussies.

    (and eating meat is bad if I understand well)

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
  135. That was one strange site. by Restil · · Score: 2

    I found myself simultaniously laughing and disgusted at the same time. I had a difficult time discerning if its a parody or if they're actually serious about it. But guess what. Its just words and pictures on a screen. I hadn't heard a thing about it until someone told me about it and I'm no more likely to stuff my cat into a jar than I was before I found the site.

    As far as I'm concerned, if no cats were actually harmed during the making of the site, I don't care at all. If the cats were dead before inserting them, I don't care. If they were alive but not in pain, I don't care.

    My point is this. This is the first time I ever heard anything about this. Even if this was some underground activity, I probably would have heard SOMETHING about it before. This improves the likelyhood that its only a parody and I intend to treat it as such. If there are those in the world that would be inclined to stuff their cats into a jar after reading that site, we probably have much worse things we need to worry about from those people than bonsai cats.

    In other news, I find people who are extreme animal rights supporters, or at least supporters of all the animals that are fuzzy and cute, to overreact in a big way to anything that even remotely threatens something thats cute and fuzzy.
    I remember the website about cat scanning that had them in an uproar because it was in some way scaring the cats or something. Everytime I take my cat to the vet, it gets all worked up. But that doesnt' mean I don't take it in every year to get its shots. At least I love my cat.

    Did you know, animal rights supporters out there, that there are orginizations that you actually support that are KILLING those cute fuzzy little kitties?? YES! Its happening every day all across the USA. The SPCA will KILL those cute fuzzy kitties. Of course, the more PC term is euthinization (sp??) but the end result is the same. Yet nobody seems to complain. I can't imagine why. See that cute cow out there in the field, eating grass. It goes "MOO" you know. It shits on the ground and smells bad. Well, somebody someday is going to kill that cow and carve it up and stick it between two pieces of bread and you're going to eat it. YES. Just think MOO whenever you eat that tasty hamburger.

    Cute little chicken. Adorable. Mmmm.. Nuggets.

    Where are the protesters???

    Froglegs Yummy. Disecting frogs in class. Where are the protestors? Didn't you know that frogs are cute, although they're not paticularly fuzzy. Come on people. PROTEST!

    I had pet rats once. Of course, I didn't buy them as pets.. I had purchased them as snakefood, but the snake must not have been hungry for rat, so I ended up with two pet rats. That evil snake was going to eat those cute little rats. Pet stores all over the place will sell cute little rats and cute little mice just so they can be fed to evil snakes. But nobody seems to be protesting.

    Yet if I even considered the possibility of feeding a kitty to a snake, letting that snake wrap around it, and suffucate it to death, and announcing that fact to the world, there would be mobs of angry protestors beating down my doors. I can't imagine the big deal, but there you go.

    Of course, I would never feed a kitty to a snake. But I have no doubt that a snake that was big enough would try to eat it, and I certainly couldn't fault the snake for trying, as its only doing what nature has instructed it to do.

    Of course, just wait. I was joking about there being no protesters against eating cows. There are. Plenty. They're just not quite as vocal yet. Soon enough though we're going to see that songs like "Carrotjuice is murder" won't be so funny anymore. They'll be candidates for National Anthem replacements.

    This rant has been brought to you by Restil.
    restil@alignment.net

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  136. And the problem is??? by Bilbo · · Score: 1
    So, what is it that you find so offensive about this cat??? I am not a "cat lover", but I see no cruelty in evidence here. So, they washed it's hair and combed it out to make it look full. Do you really think the cat is that fat?

    True, incompetent breeders do exist who in-breed animals to the point where they are hopeless genetic freaks, but to blindly accuse everyone who raises show animals of cruelty displays more ignorance on the accuser than evidence of evil on the part of the breeders.

    --

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
  137. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by pallex · · Score: 1

    "Sure, it's someone's idea of a joke, but I happen to find it offensive and don't mind saying so. "

    Do you wander around bookshops, libraries, cinemas etc going `oooh, i dont agree with that....mike, look at that. 00ooh would you just look at that!". If so, why?

  138. Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by cthugha · · Score: 1
    Any attempts at "humour" aside, this is actually pretty horrible. Law enforcement is justified in investigating a potential case of cruelty, even if such cruelty is performed in the name of creative expression.

    I defend their right to say it (provided they didn't do this to any actual kittens, in which case they should be taken to a public place and have something horrible done to them involving their entrails), but I also defend my right to send them a friendly e-mail saying precisely what I think of them, and speculating on the reasons as to why they did this, including but not limited to poor sexual performance/experience, little social interaction with their peers, and a complete lack of common humanity, maturity or intelligence.

    And I don't even like cats... :)

    1. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by pallex · · Score: 1

      "I'm not saying we should censor the Internet so kiddies don't try bad things, but this site is a lame attempt at being humorous so I don't object to the FBI investigation"

      Are you a fellow Kafka fan....or just an idiot?

    2. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

      Come on... You hvae to know you're being ridiculous. Check the site before you shoot off at the mouth.

      Bonsai Kittens don't involve cutting the kittens, only shaping their young bones by growing them in jars for a few weeks after they're born.

      Of course, it's all a joke... But, most importantly, the only pictures are of kittens half in jars for long enough to take a picture. THat's it. big fucking deal. If you can't deal with something that controversial, get the fuck off slashdot, and check out something more your speed.

      --

      When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
    3. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by cthugha · · Score: 1
      Actually, despite what my stomach thinks, goatse.cx doesn't offend me. If some guy wants to post those kinds of pictures of himself on the 'net, good on him, that's his choice and he's entitled to it; he's not doing anybody else any harm (apart from costing them their lunch, that is). I haven't visited the other pages, so I can't comment on them.

      But you seem to have gotten the impression that I want the site taken down. I don't, unless animals really were abused to create it, which I think we all know isn't the case.

    4. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by cthugha · · Score: 1
      Of course, it's all a joke... But, most importantly, the only pictures are of kittens half in jars for long enough to take a picture. THat's it. big fucking deal. If you can't deal with something that controversial, get the fuck off slashdot, and check out something more your speed.
      Sure, it's someone's idea of a joke, but I happen to find it offensive and don't mind saying so. Deal with it. The fact that you can't countenance the idea of someone taking offense at what someone else says makes you just as politically correct and fascist as the authorities trying to take the site down.

      And for the record, I didn't write them. Feeding trolls is not my idea of a fun weekend.

    5. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by Alatar · · Score: 1

      If you're offended, tough. It's that damn freedom of speech thing again. If there's a law against simulating putting kittens in jars, that law is unconstitutional. Deal with it. It's just a damn shame that some guy will have to take time out of his life and pay thousands of dollars in legal fees to defeat this federal government harassment instigated by politically correct activists.

    6. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by zhobson · · Score: 1

      Of course it's a joke. By the time you get to be an MIT undergrad, you have the necessary biology and engineering training to know that this is an absurd concept. I knew immediately that it was a joke when I pulled up the site.

      You know what? I still didn't think it was funny.

      I don't advocate wasting FBI resources on a something as stupid as this, but I certainly reserve the right to be disgusted by it. Hell, if the FBI wants a dumb site to interfere with, they should track down the guy that owns goatse.cx. As far as I'm concerned, that site is about as funny as Bonsai Kitten.

      So to the FBI I say: Get a life.

      To the people who keep shouting "IT'S A JOKE" every time someone expresses disgust, I have this to say: Duh. Now get a life.

      To the guy who created the Bonsai Kitten site: Get to work on Bonsai Hamster! That would be funny.

      -zack

    7. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by Grahf666 · · Score: 1

      If Neo Nazi's can advocate Jew hatred, then MIT grad students can advocate stuffing cats in bottles.

      Besides the fact that one group is dead serious and the other is a joke, the speech of both ought to be protected, as long as they don't actually hurt anybody (and it has already been established that bonsaikitten.com didn't hurt anything).

    8. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by /dev/zero · · Score: 1
      The fact that you can't countenance the idea of someone taking offense at what someone else says makes you just as politically correct and fascist as the authorities trying to take the site down.

      No, it doesn't.

      There is a world of difference between Karma Sink writing a message disagreeing with you and government wielding force to silence someone.

      In other words, there is a difference between speech and force.

      Gordon.

      --

      He that breaks a thing to find out what it is has left the path of wisdom.
      -- J.R.R. Tolkien
    9. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by cthugha · · Score: 1
      There is a world of difference between Karma Sink writing a message disagreeing with you and government wielding force to silence someone.

      True enough, although I didn't appreciate being told to get off /. simply because I had the temerity to strongly disagree with a particular idea or point of view.

    10. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by MsGeek · · Score: 1
      I admit, I was fooled by this site...for a total of five minutes.

      This is sick humor, but humor nonetheless. Grow a sense of humor, Cthugha.


      ----
      http://www.msgeek.org/ -- All your estrogen are belong to us!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    11. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1
      Actually, he's got just as much right to be offended as they have to post offensive pictures.
      That wonderful freedom of speech thing again...

      the unbeliever
      aim:dasubergeek99
      yahoo!:blackrose91
      ICQ:1741281

    12. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by cthugha · · Score: 1
      If you're offended, tough. It's that damn freedom of speech thing again. If there's a law against simulating putting kittens in jars, that law is unconstitutional.

      Read my original post. I didn't say that they shouldn't be allowed to put material like this up; my point was that if it looks real, then it is legitimately the subject of an investigation into cruelty, and that freedom of speech allows me to pass comment just as much as it allows the site authors to create the original material. I probably wasn't very clear about it, for which I apologize.

    13. Re:Bonsai cats? Yurgh! by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

      Is thsat your problem?

      The reason I said that in the first place is because I think that if you're going to be offnded by Bonzai Kitten, you're going to get much more offended by a lot of shit that is offered here on slashdot. If you're going to run around and want a sterile view of the world that you're not going to disagree with, check out pentagon.gov, or mary-kateandashley.com, or something equally tapioca and pathetic.

      --

      When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
  139. Motherfucking War on the Government by Bob+Gortician · · Score: 1

    It would be really easy for the real G hackers to bootfuck the FBI, IRS by writing viruses that target specific systems. Hell, I could do it if I wasn't so lazy.

    Everyone knows the mega-capitalists of the late 1800s and early 1900s (J.P. Morgan, Rockefellers, That German banker family) gave Lenin and Trotsky $10 million in gold to seize power in Russia. Inf fact, the Rockefellers oil fields (Standard Oil) in Russia were never nationalized!
    Now having control of the U.S. and a fake Superpower, they then implemented tax-free foundations, to protect their massive wealth, and the income tax, to prevent any others from obtaining massive amounts of wealth.
    So they proceed to milk and rape us for a century or so. Little things like us giving millions in "non-lethal aid" (fucking truck tires!) to the U.S.S.R. DURING the Vietnam war! These supplies were then brought into northern Vietnam and used against our own troops. It is plainly obvious to anyone with a brain that we have propped Russia up for the past 40 years, all the while claiming to fear them. They's still starve without us.
    The fucking Russians still sweep the streets with brooms made of sticks. Can't operate complex machinery like Pasteurization machines. Yet, they developed atomic weapons in parallel with us? Only by our providing the blueprints and technologies.
    Bilderburger Group? Wake up, you dumb fucking Slashdotters. Some of you have mad skills, and you're chowned like the rest of us. 39% tax bracket? 50% tax on corporations? Uttery fucking owned by the state. Ayn Rand was right, most of you are mindless drones.

    American tobacco contains ionizing radiation. Mandated by law! The fertilizers are radioactive by-products. Look it up, polonium-190? Even imported tobacco is from the U.S. (Drum, Samson). Lead in cigarettes? Why?

    Keep feeding the parasitical Freemason, Rockefeller world government, run by the moron son of a megaspook. I'll keep smoking dope, coding, and playing music. You can keep the funny money.

    Let them move to Open Source. Then wipe them the fuck out.

    --
    Get my free Hitchhiker's Guide Tribute Novella:
  140. just to jump on the bandwagon... by perrin5 · · Score: 1

    I am tired of reactionary bullshit! The FBI is required, by law, to investigate this. It falls under the same category as teachers being REQUIRED to report any suspicions of child abuse to authorities, etc. So get off the FBI's back, at least about trying to get enough information to make a well considered opinion.

    That said: I am still tired of reactionary bullshit! Talking about stuffing kitties into non-existant jars, and selling them for profit is LEGAL. Not only that, but it does not hurt anyone. I am sick and tired of hearing this same old slippery slope argument: "If someone writes down, performs, sings, or says something that suggests doing something bad, then they must be punished, because other people might actually DO that something bad." Does this remind anyone of anything? Say the slippery slope argument used to start, and subsequently lose the Vietnam Police Action? People, we live in a free country (at least it says so in all the textbooks) not a comfortable one.

    To be free, you must be able to express yourself, and must be exposed to other people expressing themselves. Even, no especially, if their ideas are uncomfortable to you. That's the basis of freedom. It's a joke, you might not think it's funny, but others do, and if some sick fuck actually thinks it's funny enough to try themselves, then they, and only they, should be punished. ACTION can be punished, not words. You cannot persecute heresy anymore, it doesn't work with multiple ideals.

    --
    hmmmm?
    1. Re:just to jump on the bandwagon... by fatmantis · · Score: 1

      obviously you haven't thought this through: people need to be responsible with the memes they be dishing out. asshole.

      --

      ::I will not moderate my opinions for your stinking karma

    2. Re:just to jump on the bandwagon... by rking · · Score: 1

      The FBI is required, by law, to investigate this.

      I would be astonished if that were true. The FBI is an organisation with limited resources. It wouldn't be possible for them to investigate all situations in which someone might conceivably be committing a federal offence and if the law requires that they do so then they are constantly breaking that law, simply because they have no choice but to do so. I don't believe there is any such law though, could you tell me where I could find it?

    3. Re:just to jump on the bandwagon... by Lughlamfainne · · Score: 1

      and you need to learn the meaning of satire..read some of the other posts in here for example...

      --
      .sig under construction
  141. Re:A joke? by el_chicano · · Score: 1
    They really must be putting something very bad in the water lately...
    Nah, it is probably the extra-strong crack that is floating around the D.C. area...
    --
    You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  142. it's a joke by monkeyserver.com · · Score: 2

    I laughed, it's a joke, my damn cats get their heads in the smallest of glasses. BTW, if they really are locking cats in jars then they should be punished. But I think that most people aren't that dumb. From the amount of effort put into the site, I would imagine this is all a silly spoof, they some one took a little too far

    --
    http://monkeyserver.com --- weeeeee
    1. Re:it's a joke by elb · · Score: 1

      What's that great line...

      "No one ever lost any money by understimating the stupidity of the American public"?

    2. Re:it's a joke by 1+1trouble · · Score: 1

      "But I think that most people aren't that dumb." You'd be surprised.

  143. Motivation? by Bilbo · · Score: 1
    OK... I'll admit this is the first decent, thoughtful "defense" of the site. I do think satire is a powerful tool when used by the likes of Jonathan Swift, as a way to get us to look deeply into our own hearts and examine our thoughts and motivations.

    But when does "satire" become nothing more than a cheap shot? Making fun of cat lovers is like shooting fish in a barrel. It's easy to make fun of cats and cat shows and breeders and little old ladies who lavish lace and goodies on their adorable little "bon-bons", and spend more on caskets for their deceased pets than some countries spend on royal funerals. Is this nothing more than someone's way to make fun of people they don't like, to make a quick buck, grab their 15 minutes of fame and be declaired a hero for spreading cow dung on religious icons in front of everybody?

    --

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
    1. Re:Motivation? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2
      I think it may be more thoughtful than that. I don't think it's just a cheap shot at cat-lovers, but perhaps a more significant commentary on the human love of shaping nature to our own aesthetic standards. For a lot of people, the beauty that nature provides just isn't aligned enough with their own aesthetic, they have to tame it, shape it to their own desires.

      Or perhaps the site is just a cheap shot at cat lovers for being so silly. Sort of like reading James Joyce - you can interpret it on so many levels. Whether you agree or not, though, doesn't give you the right to censor it.

    2. Re:Motivation? by Skyhawk_Dreamer · · Score: 1

      I didn't see Bonsai as a cheap shot at cat lovers, just as I didn't think Swift's "Proposal" was a cheap shot at the Irish. In fact, I bet the author of the site might actually be surprised at the reaction and attention this has received. Look at the wording at Bonsai carefully. It mentions "fusing cat's tails for carrying convenience", and repeatedly talks about being the "envy of your neighbours". To me, this is very obviously making fun of those who would alter the topology or shape of nature for convenience and vanity. I thought it was much more obvious than Swift's "Proposal". The nature of satire is that your not making fun of the obvious subject matter (like the Irish). You exagerate the viewpoint of those who would believe or do the same thing in a related or lessor sense in order to make fun of them! Don't you "get it"? Is satire really dead in America?

  144. Bullshit... by Karma+Sink · · Score: 5

    Snopes had a page on this not too long ago, and I'be been watching it ever since... There are a goodly number of groups that are trying to fight this. All of them are fucking ridiculous, but what can you do.

    If you want a place to troll the fuck out of, I highly suggest This message board, a group devoted to the love of kitties, and how bonzaikitten.com is evil, how would they like to be stuffed in jars, etc...

    It's fucking ridiculous. It's exactly what was said in Farenheit 451... Society got to the point where we couldn't offend anyone, the Irish, Jewish, Cat-lovers, Dog-lovers, etc, etc... Until finally, we had to censor everything, and everything had to turn to tapioca bullshit just to make everyone happy.

    Fuck that. This site is fucking hilarious, and needs to stay.

    --

    When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
    1. Re:Bullshit... by wuice · · Score: 1

      Well, except for the fact that satire, by definition, satirizes something. What the hell does this satarize? People use the word "satire" way too much, I think. This site isn't satire; it's a sick, tasteless, clasless, mindless, disgusting joke. The last time I checked, though, that's still legal.

    2. Re:Bullshit... by AoT · · Score: 1

      it satirizes the cat/dog breeding culture. the one that has made the cutest cats that are inbred and have many health problems because of it, that is what it parodies.

    3. Re:Bullshit... by Denial+of+Service · · Score: 1
      Truly you are the worst debator I've ever had the misfortune of sumbling across. Tell me, pray, are you attractive enough yourself to avoid being slaughtered? Didn't think so.

      IHBT.

      ---

      --

      ---
      Slashdot: News For Zealots. Stuff That's Hypocritical.
    4. Re:Bullshit... by MrGrendel · · Score: 1

      I did look at the site and I do think it's supposed to be a joke, but I'm not entirely sure. People who do this kind of thing in real life often brag about it in the form of a joke. Partly because they think it's clever (look at me! I can torture and tell jokes!) and partly as an easy out if they talk themselves into trouble. A lot of these people think torturing animals is fine, but they also know that most people don't share that opinion. But rather than try to justify what they have done (most of them are cowards), they act as if it is all a big joke. This allows them to have a good laugh with other morons and most other people write them off as tasteless asses, so they don't feel as if they might get into real trouble or have a real confrontation because of their bragging.

    5. Re:Bullshit... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      But do you believe that promotion of these things (as evil as they may be) should be illegal?

      I honestly believe that freedom of speech must come first.

    6. Re:Bullshit... by wuice · · Score: 1

      Really?

      Well, that's pretty sick.
      Guess I'd have to be a breeder.

    7. Re:Bullshit... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      It's not about racial groups, it's about animal abuse...human cruelty.
      I will never cease to be amazed by the anglo-saxons. They will let humans be hurt or killed by letting people carry guns, so they can shoot anyone who's passing on their land (as in Texas), yet they will go to great lengths to insure that animals are not hurt.

      A number of years ago, Toronto really became a laughingstock when baseball player Dave Winfield, after accidentally killing a (which, by the way, is vermin - it's basically a rat with wings), was instantly arrested by the police and busted for cruelty to animals.

      Excerpt from this website http://www.stanford.edu/~greggjp/EEEEEE/Notes00/Ma y00Notes1.html

      If I remember right, Winfield was actually arrested, though the charges were dropped. Something about Billy Martin refuting the very idea that Winfield could've hit the bird on purpose, given that he hadn't hit a cutoff man all year. (In case you don't know what I'm talking about, Winfield was booed for years in Toronto after killing a seagull -- the national bird of Canada -- with a thrown baseball.)
      (More links about this: Twisted history - Sports Watch - CBS sportsline - And, here, on TAHOE.COM, a disgustingly sick column that hints that deliberately injuring severely someone is okay while playing any sport - Yankeehater)

      Those people really have their priorities totally screwed-up as a society.

      --

    8. Re:Bullshit... by meldroc · · Score: 1

      Hey, c'mon!!! I love animals!!! They're delicious!!! They're also very fashionable. How dare you suggest that I forgo my hamburgers and leather jackets!!! That's just uncivilized!!!

      --

      Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
    9. Re:Bullshit... by Fesh · · Score: 1
      Maybe also satirizing the way veal is produced... Except applying it to cute kittens instead of cows. Hey, the site might even be protesting animal cruelty by showing how offensive it'd be to treat kittens the same way people treat calves. Yeah, that's the ticket!


      --Fesh

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    10. Re:Bullshit... by mj01nir · · Score: 1

      I tried. I really did. But I couldn't help myself. I just *had* to tweak these people. I can't wait to see what kind of response shows up in my fake e-mail address. Maybe I can forward the best ones to bonsaikitten.com for them to post...

      Are these people kidding? If they want the web sanitized, prehaps they should remember how effective book burning has been. They might change their minds...

      --
      the no .sig .sig
    11. Re:Bullshit... by StarTux · · Score: 1

      You are entitled to your opinion, even though most of it consisted of the word "fuck". Maybe you are not getting enough???

      Anyway, I have to disagree, its a disgusting site, but should only stay if its really not true (and makes that clear somewhere on his site...)

      If its true then its goodbye and goodriddance.

      Simple enough huh? No civilization should condone cruelty against animals, if ti does then its not civilized.

  145. Bonsai kittens by Netmonger · · Score: 1

    The freedom of speech has almost nothing to do here - it is eclipsed by the extent of the wrong being done. If this site's content is the truth, they should be shut down. I looked at the pic from the link off slashdot: While your average 20-something MALE tech geak might be able to handle looking at something like that, there are alot of people on the net who that might cause extreme emotional discomfort. People who torture animals in this manner are evil and sick - period. While the right to express yourself is paramount, it doesnt mean you should run out and think of every way you can to shock people. Marilyn Manson is a prime example of a retard who seems to follow this idea. And it is far worse to stuff kittens in jars - 'duh - hello!?!? Quite frankly, I think you have to be one cold son of a bitch not to agree.. Our govenment spends alot more money, on alot stupid'er stuff than this: Shut the sick f**kers down.

    --
    -- NeTMoNGeR
  146. Re:Sentiment in literature by el_chicano · · Score: 1
    Pay it Forward seemed to move you because it kills a child in the last 5 minutes
    And the ending of another movie I haven't seen yet is ruined by another thoughtless idiot!

    Next time put [SPOILER] in the subject line so that people can make an informed decision on whether or not to read the post in question...
    --
    You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  147. Re:Carnivore by blonde+rser · · Score: 1

    Do you seriously not see a difference. The FBI as a publicly run body must kneel to the limitations that we, the people, set for them. Yet we the people do not have to limit ourselves to anything exept the rule of man. We give the FBI certain powers but those powers must be constantly policed in order to prevent corruption; corruption of power is intolerable. Since the corruption of man is equivilant to social evolution it is not held to the same restrictions; any attempt to limit social evolution can lead to revolution. These arguments are therefore not contradictions.

  148. You hit the nail on the head. by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

    Great insight. Makes perfect sense.

  149. What's in a name? by threaded · · Score: 1
    What's in a name? that which we call a rose, By any other name would smell as sweet;

    Shakespeare, W., 1594, Romeo and Juliet, Act II, Scene II

  150. What does it tell us? by townmouse · · Score: 1
    I think that the reason people fear this site, isnt so much what it depicts towards animals, but rather what it says about human nature.

    What on Earth does it tell us about human nature that we don't know already? We already know that pain and disfigurement (e.g. Tom & Jerry) often amuses people. We already know that when most people find something funny, some people will not. These people are, perhaps unfairly, criticised for having a poor sense of humour. We already know that many people are stupid, including some of the humourless.

    Do you have any evidence that it's 'the ones who deny acknowledging their dark nature' who are more likely to commit acts of cruelty, or are you just automatically regurgitating pop psychology?

    --
    Ask me if I've been required to disclose any crypto keys.
  151. Re:Censorship has bipartisan support by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    The rabid anti-left sentiment of some people amazes me, as if believing in human rights over profits was something to be ashamed of.
    Profits are necessary to create jobs, and the jobs do more good in the first place than any amount of charity which could be enabled by diverting said profits (and the capital formation they enable).

    When someone believes that the person who's making a profit has thereby violated some third party's human rights by virtue of keeping the profits for capital formation instead of donating them to Some Worthy Cause, that someone is only for those human rights they agree with (and if you don't see that agenda in much of the anti-corporate agenda, have your eyes checked). Kind of like the Religious Right in the mirror.

    Real respect for rights is exclusively about respecting the right of others to do things you don't like. (And real education includes learning about mathematics, chemistry, physics, economics and all that "hard stuff" which is obviously a foreign language to so many leftists. They'd prefer to label it "bourgeois" or "not part of their way of knowing" and ignore it.)
    --
    Knowledge is power
    Power corrupts
    Study hard

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  152. X-Files material by toddhisattva · · Score: 1
    Were the agents named Scully and Dogget? I mean, a kitty in a Klein bottle might take the Lone Gunmen to figure out!

    There are reasons FBI agents are called "Feebs." This is one of them.

    This reminds me of the pathetic SS (Schutzstaffel) harassment of Steve Jackson Games: Dumb people with power.

    "Power tends to corrupt. Stupidity tends to speed the process."

    -toddhisattva

  153. Limerick time! by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2

    A mathematician named Klein
    Said "The Moebius strip is divine!
    And if you glue
    The edges of two
    You'll get a weird bottle like mine."
    --
    Knowledge is power
    Power corrupts
    Study hard

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  154. No, It's Real by nathanm · · Score: 1

    Did you check out the link in the Wired article to the Humane Society?

  155. Re:An All-time low by AoT · · Score: 1
    try

    here

    here

    and here

    now which one should be banned?

  156. Am I missing something? by donglekey · · Score: 1

    Allanach said she's not sure if the site is a parody -- and even if it isn't, it should be taken offline because it could encourage people to experiment on their own household pets.

    So it she thinks that it being a parody is worse than it being real?

    1. Re:Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Her opinion is encouraging me to experiment on animal rights organizations!

      She should be taken offline.

  157. Re:Censorship has bipartisan support by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    (And real education includes learning about mathematics, chemistry, physics, economics and all that "hard stuff" which is obviously a foreign language to so many leftists. They'd prefer to label it "bourgeois" or "not part of their way of knowing" and ignore it.)

    Yes, all leftists are stupid and lazy. Way to make an argument. Just because we don't fall for the bull that money is the only thing that matters in life.
    I don't have anything against profits and neither do most leftists, what we object to is profits before anything else. Such as Nike transferring it's manufacturing to Far-Eastern sweatshops, or McDonnell-Douglas selling arms to the Chinese that are then used in the oppression of it's people.
    Anyway leftists are much more respectful of people's rights to behave. You don't hear left-wing politicians denouncing homosexuals for example. I, for one, couldn't care less what anyone else does, so long as they don't hurt or otherwise abuse someone else.
    I wish Americans would stop associating the left wing with totalitarian communism. It's just as ludicrous as comparing George W Bush with Hitler.

  158. Re:Better Proof for "People are Stupid in Masses"? by elb · · Score: 1
    It's almost ironic how pictures of people being beaten, tortured, brutally killed, and dead on autopsy tables can be readily found on the Internet, but put a fake picture of a kitty on a bottle up and you've got hell.


    I very strongly suspect that the reason we get more outraged over torture of [domestic] animals (and children) than we do the torture and deaths of adults is that domestic animals and children are completely dependent on grown adults for their livlihood. Adults can remove themselves from risky situations (to some extent); if you live in a bad neighborhood, you can move, or you don't go out at night, or you install extra locks on your doors. Adults at least have the option of trying to lower the probability that they get doused in gasoline and thrown off a bridge -- adults can carry a gun or learn aikido or travel in protective groups.

    But if a pet finds itself in an environment where its only source of food and companionship is malicious, it can't do anything about it.

    It's not just the torture that is horrifying: it's the torture of the weak and the helpless. Rape is terrible; rape of your grandmother lying in the nursing home is even worse.
  159. The US is already a policestate by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Highest incarceration rates in the world
    Highest police firearm incidents rates in the world
    Most repressive forfieture laws in the world, where guilt isnt even needed
    & such a reliance on uncorrobarated paid snitches & plea-bargin snowballs that the whole justice system is tainted.
    Police even get bonuses based on forfeitures.

  160. read this first by b0r1s · · Score: 1

    trolling new sites just for the sake of trolling ... has been taken too far in recent days... for an example of this, go to lovetestclub.com and look at what a few geekizoid readers managed to cause... most of the damage has since been removed by the site's admin, but if you read some of the more innocent looking threads, you'll notice some very inciteful responses. Thus, I warn you that trolling a random message board just for the sake of trolling a message board is probably something that you should reconsider.

    --
    Mooniacs for iOS and Android
    1. Re:read this first by Karma+Sink · · Score: 1

      Normally, I wouldn't, but bleeding heart fuckheads who want to censor everything they don't like piss me off. The lovetestclub board didn't need to get ripped up, but these folks deserve anything they can get.

      --

      When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
    2. Re:read this first by JesseL · · Score: 2

      I think that trolling often plays a critical role in discussion boards. It can force us to reexamine our opinions, remeber why we originally formed our opinions, and consider the merits of alternative opinions. Without trolls discussion would stagnate and ideas would never be fully explored. People that get really worked up over trolls that simply put forth non-party-line ideas are the ones that really need trolling.

      All the natalieportmanbeowulfgoatse.cxhotgrits crap is just noise not real trolls.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  161. Protected, yes, tasteful, eh, probably not, BUT... by Dirtside · · Score: 2
    ...I did want to point out one line from the article:

    Jered Floyd, a recent MIT graduate, says animal rights activists -- who have successfully pressured hosting services to ban bonsaikitten.com until rotten.com offered it server space -- don't have a sense of humor.

    "The First Amendment protects all speech, no matter how offensive some people may find it," Floyd says. "The site is clearly a humorous endeavor. The fact that a number of people seem to have very little sense of humor isn't relevant."

    This is of course not true. Certain forms of speech (or expression) are NOT protected, such as incitement to riot, slander, libel, yelling "FIRE!!" in a crowded theater (I'm not even sure if that's okay if there really *is* a fire, you're still supposed to try to get everyone out calmly, I think), and death threats via the mail. All of these (and a few more) have been determined by the various courts over the years to not be protected speech.

    That said, bonsaikitten.com is clearly satire, and is (and should remain) protected speech.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  162. Well... by Scoria · · Score: 1

    ... they could always call it "Petter of Kitties" if they want it to sound cute and lovable...

    --
    Do you like German cars?
  163. Guestbook fun by Fervent · · Score: 1
    The guestbook includes some great email addresses of people who thought Bonzai Kitten was real, and proceded to taunt/racially discriminate against the webmaster, who is obviously not Chinese. They were also dumb enough to include their actual email addresses.

    You can have some fun with these:

    rburn@quad.com
    MoldysMula@aol.com
    lrp@lirponics.com
    jm@fpwa.com
    screed_2001@yahoo.com

    --------
    Carmack is an elitist, pseudonerd bastard.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    1. Re:Guestbook fun by Fervent · · Score: 2
      hydrodynamics, audiodynamics, political theology, and aerodynamics

      Sorry. Names in scientific fields, where the stakes for fame are so high, don't readily come to mind.

      --------
      Carmack is an elitist, pseudonerd bastard.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    2. Re:Guestbook fun by peccary · · Score: 3

      Didn't you recognize the guestbook entry by the esteemed ex MIT professor, Dr. Lirpa? Dr. Lirpa has made a great number of breakthroughs, including in the field of hydrodynamics, audiodynamics, political theology, and aerodynamics, among others. Dr. Lirpa is not a force to be trifled with.

  164. Re:Censorship has bipartisan support by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    Because vegetarians are all trying to undermine society by putting the meat trade out of business, therefore having an anti-corporate agenda. Remember that the left-wing are all communists and you know that communists censor everything, not like that nice Mr Hitler. The rabid anti-left sentiment of some people amazes me, as if believing in human rights over profits was something to be ashamed of.

  165. Re:Joke? Yeah� Is it obvious to everyone? No� by el_chicano · · Score: 1
    Don't you remember that old civics class lesson about how rights come with responsibility? Then quit whining and take responsibility for deluding people
    Shouldn't the people who take offense have the responsibility to check for themselves that they are being trolled by a satirical website? Or is it the government's responsibility to protect them from -- GOD FORBID -- humor?

    And you are mistaken about the whining that is going on. The ones who are trying to shut down a LEGAL website are the ones that are the true whiners...
    --
    You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  166. Better Proof for "People are Stupid in Masses"? by portege00 · · Score: 3

    ...I can't think of a better example myself. It's almost amusing and at the same time sad to see how people feel that jokes like this are somehow real and/or enourage others to commit acts of cruelty

    If you're sick enough to put cats in a bottle, then I seriously doubt you were of sound mind and judgement before you saw this web site. If you actually believed this was real, then you're gulliable. People, come on, lighten up.

    It's almost ironic how pictures of people being beaten, tortured, brutally killed, and dead on autopsy tables can be readily found on the Internet, but put a fake picture of a kitty on a bottle up and you've got hell. This is a very clear indication of the backward priorities and lack of critical thought our society possesses.

    --
    Trolls make great pets. Adopt one today!
  167. Re:Sigh... by elb · · Score: 1

    Yes, www.kleinbottle.com does in fact sell pseudo-lkeins, or 3D representations of klein bottles. A coworker recently purchased one and it's sitting on his desk.

    see a picture of the bottle on his desk.

  168. Re:Censorship has bipartisan support by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2
    (And real education includes learning about mathematics, chemistry, physics, economics and all that "hard stuff" which is obviously a foreign language to so many leftists. They'd prefer to label it "bourgeois" or "not part of their way of knowing" and ignore it.)
    Yes, all leftists are stupid and lazy. Way to make an argument. Just because we don't fall for the bull that money is the only thing that matters in life.
    I almost forgot to say that too many leftists like to substitute tactics for winning arguments (including the Big Lie and the straw man) for facts and logical analysis. (You went for the straw-man, which reminded me.) There's a large number of people out there who have just substituted leftist dogma for religious dogma, and are otherwise no different from any believer in The One Truth (as they see it).

    Deconstructionism and Political Correctness are both leftist inventions. There are legions of tales of students in universities who are afraid to contradict the PC party line in their classes because of the harassment they'd experience. That's oppression.

    Did I mention the number of apparently-serious leftist rants which display complete ignorance of little matters like the Second Law of Thermodynamics? The number of English and Poli Sci majors out there who think that you can get something for nothing by agitating the legislature or running a plebiscite is amazing.

    what we object to is profits before anything else. Such as Nike transferring it's manufacturing to Far-Eastern sweatshops, or McDonnell-Douglas selling arms to the Chinese that are then used in the oppression of it's people.
    (Add grammar to that list of deficiencies... the possessive pronoun "its" has no apostrophe.) What's wrong with moving work to plants in El Salvador or Vietnam? Don't people with brown skins and slanted eyes have a right to take a job making stuff for North American consumers? If they had anything better, you'd expect they'd take it; saying that Nike or whoever is doing them wrong when there are so many eager takers is equivalent to telling those people that they should starve while someone in the USA (who has much better prospects and almost certainly will not go hungry regardless) should do unskilled work.

    Ditto this thing about MacDac etc. If the French are willing to sell oppressive crap to the Chinese, we might as well undercut them. Why let them profit from undermining the pressure that trade sanctions can put on human-rights violators?

    Anyway leftists are much more respectful of people's rights to behave.
    Are they now? Isn't it lefist students on various campuses who persistently violate the free-speech rights of people with whom they disagree, by heckling their speakers out of auditoria and destroying print runs of their newspapers? I'm not talking about protests against people's actions, I'm talking about trying to keep them from having their views heard. That's respect? Or is it some PC re-definition, where it's contempt if it's done to you, but respect if you do it to others?

    That's what I keep hearing about the political left. I have no sympathy for it or any of its adherents until they give their views and actions the same level of criticism they aim at others.
    --
    Knowledge is power
    Power corrupts
    Study hard

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  169. yeah, there's some excellent copyright satire here by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1
    in one of the indignant animal-lover emails [and the webmaster's response] in their guestbook:

    Your site has been reported to the United States Department of Agriculture, The Humane Society of the United States, IP host, and InterNIC. Also your affiliation with your education (collage) is being flagged. I suggest your site be remove immediately and not repeated elsewhere. Your site has been copied entirely for further actions should they occur.

    Dear Rust,

    We wish to assure you that we have all the appropriate Bonsai Kitticulture permits required for this simple and painless procedure. We do not understand what you are flagellating about. And we doubt that Rust is your real name. Also, common law copyright exists on these web pages, and we warn you to destroy the illegal copies that you admit to have made or you will face prosecution for stealing our creative property.

    ---
    --

    Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
  170. Re:Censorship has bipartisan support by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

    You called me stupid and lazy which is nothing more than an insult. You then proceed to take issue with a typo as if it proves your point. You then imply that I'm a racist, even though leftist politics are totally against this. People in the Far East have a right to work in the safe conditions with the same employment rights as those enjoyed by Western factory workers. This is not what they get.
    As for arms sales to China, 'someone else will do it if we don't' is the usual justification for something unjustifiable. The Chinese is one of the most repressive around and yet instead of trying to change this through subtle application of economic pressure, it's a free-for-all and to hell with the Tibetans and those who were massacred in Tiananamen Square (and if that's spelled wrong so what). To paraphrase your earlier argument, don't people with brown skins and slanty eyes have a right not to be brutally murdered with western-made weapons.
    Finally, I've seen many more leftists harassed for expressing their views than rightists. I've seen racist thugs attack a peaceful demonstration against racism which is a bit nastier than mere heckling.
    I have total contempt for the political right who think that if you're poor, sick, disabled or otherwise disadvantaged then tough luck.
    PC has not gone too far. When I was at school 15 years ago racist abuse was the norm. Now anyone who makes a racist comment is immediately slapped down because it's totally unacceptable and quite right too. This isn't extremism, it's common decency. I don't see what the second law of thermodynamics has to do with politics at all, it's merely physics and would exist whether the human race did or not.

  171. BonsaiSpook.com by drenehtsral · · Score: 2

    Maybe we should put up a similar website BonsaiSpook.com with FBI agents crammed into jars =:-)

    --

    ---
    Play Six Pack Man. I
  172. Oh, it's your reading problems! by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2
    You called me stupid and lazy which is nothing more than an insult.
    Let's start with what I really said:
    ...real education includes learning about mathematics, chemistry, physics, economics and all that "hard stuff" which is obviously a foreign language to so many leftists.
    I was talking about those leftists to whom those things are a foreign language. Does that include you? If so, you had no reason to be insulted, because it was accurate. If not, then you had no reason to be insulted because it was not about you. What's your problem?
    You then imply that I'm a racist, even though leftist politics are totally against this.
    I was pointing out a disconnect between your politics and the avowed goals of those politics. To desire a thing is to desire the means to that thing, and also the consequences of that thing; you cannot do just one thing.
    People in the Far East have a right to work in the safe conditions with the same employment rights as those enjoyed by Western factory workers. This is not what they get.
    You have this funny notion of rights. Before anyone had the knowledge and wealth (especially wealth) to create the safe conditions we now take for granted, who had a "right" to them? You are talking about a plant in a country where laws barely exist, where the roads may never have seen pavement and the electricity may work for 4 hours a day. You are talking about places where people live under kleptocracies which want huge cuts of anything profitable. The kind of plant you and I take for granted couldn't be built there, let alone operated and maintained. A company would go broke trying.

    What I see is you and thousands of others crying that what those poor folks in Vietnam and El Salvador have isn't good enough for you, even though it's better than anything they had before. There's no recognition of the fact that you have to start somewhere, and that perfection is impossible but progress is always achievable. The insistence on perfection is indistinguishable in practice from demanding that nothing be done.

    The Chinese is one of the most repressive around and yet instead of trying to change this through subtle application of economic pressure, it's a free-for-all and to hell with the Tibetans and those who were massacred in Tiananamen Square....
    I own and wear a "Democracy for China" T-shirt, that I bought with my own money. So there. (I also own and wear a button which says "The Second Amendment isn't about hunting. It's about Tienanmen Square." Chew on that for a while.) But I don't see the point in letting a French or Belgian company profit from their governments' refusal to join a sanctions regime against human-rights abusers. If they are going to undercut the viability of sanctions as a tool to advance human rights, they shouldn't have the field to themselves. That's just rewarding them for their lack of morals. I'm all for sanctions, and everyone in the Western democracies joining them. I'm also for cutting the legs out from under those who prevent this from happening.
    I've seen many more leftists harassed for expressing their views than rightists.
    And have you ever seen them given official immunity for blatant acts of vandalism? I refer you to this page about the University of Pennsylvania, which includes this thumbnail sketch of the incident in question:
    -----
    In 1993 a guest conservative columnist for a university-recognized student publication, the Daily Pennsylvanian, wrote an editorial critical of the university's hate-speech code, admissions policies that favored minorities, and over-the-top multiculturalism. A group of black students accused the writer of racial harassment, but the charge was dropped by the administration when the journalist pointed out an official university policy that expressly forbade investigation of students for opinions published in school papers. In retaliation for the dismissal of charges, a group calling itself "The Black Community'' stole an entire pressrun of the newspaper. Even after the students proudly confessed to vandalism, Hackney refused to discipline them. ''After the event, the number of reported newspaper thefts on campuses quadrupled,'' says an alumnus. "There was no question that Hackney's unwillingness to punish the students was a green light to copycat cases of newspaper thefts around the country. The message at Penn was clear: if an article insults you, feel free to steal and destroy the paper.''
    -----
    Right-wing demagogues and vandals get prosecuted, left-wing demagogues and vandals get plaudits. Where's the balance?
    PC has not gone too far.
    From the same page on U-Penn:
    -----
    Then there was the so-called water buffalo incident. In January of 1993 a group of female African-American students were chanting and making other noises outside a dormitory where several students were studying and sleeping. It was around midnight, and the students in the dorm, disturbed by the noise, gathered at the windows to shout at the women to be quiet. Eventually police were called. Based on the complaints of the students outside, the police interrogated dormitory resident Eden Jacobowitz, who admitted to shouting "Shut up, you water buffalo.'' The Judicial Inquiry Office of the university charged Jacobowitz with racial harassment under the hate-speech code.
    -----
    If that isn't too far for you, you've got a serious problem with your eyesight, and I'm not the only one who thinks so. Take a look at this commentary for the POV of an avowed leftist who taught in Nicaragua under the Sandidistas; he happens to agree with me on the pernicious nature of Political Correctness, deconstructionism and the notion of social construction.
    --
    Knowledge is power
    Power corrupts
    Study hard
    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    1. Re:Oh, it's your reading problems! by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      If the international community agrees on sanctions then western countries tend to be pretty good at adhering to them (e.g. Iraq). But there are to be no sanctions against China, even though the Chinese government is just as odious as Saddam Hussein. You pride yourself on your anti-China paraphernalia, then attempt to justify the west's propping up of the regime and you accuse leftists of hypocrisy,
      I can't refer you to a page that shows women being attacked on an anti-racist march by right-wing thugs, although I was there and also had to fend them off as well, with a greater degree of success since I'm a 15 stone martial artist.
      The article you refer to is very interesting and the actions of the students in vandalising the newspaper is nothing short of disgraceful, and the water buffalo incident is obviously ludicrous. These are not true leftists but people who are acutely sensitive to racism, real or imagined.
      My definition of workers' rights are simple:
      not being forced to work over 45 hours a week unless you want to;
      being able to work in a safe environment without fear of injury where the onus is on the staff and the managers to co-operate on keeping the plant safe;
      management should not have the right to arbitrarily dismiss 'troublesome' employees;
      No-one under the age of 16 should be employed in dangerous conditions;
      workers should have the right to join a union.
      Why shouldn't they have these rights? Why should they have to fight for rights that Nike et al would have no problem providing? There is no reason whatsoever, apart from that it would impact the bottom line. Just because the governments of Thailand or China are corrupt doesn't mean a thing - workers' rights can and should be provided. Saying that they'd be worse off without a job is no excuse for virtual slave labour - in fact that's the same specious argument used by the mill owners against providing rights to British workers in the past.
      Finally whether some leftists are stupid and lazy is irrelevant. I doubt the morons that attacked the march I was on had first-class honours degrees either, or anything but the most basic education.

  173. Re:Joke? Yeah� Is it obvious to everyone? No by el_chicano · · Score: 1
    I said that people need to take personal responsibility when excersing their right to free speech, to be sure that it doesn't infringe unfairly upon anyones one fundamental right of the US Constitution: To allow citizens: Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
    If putting up bonsaikitten.com makes the admin of bonsaikitten happy, then your attempts at getting the government to censor his website are violating his rights. Or are you trying to tell us that web surfers have the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" but website operators don't?

    Also, why is it that the website operators have to exercise responsibility and the web surfers don't? If the protestors had exercised personal responsiblity then we would have never heard of bonasikitten.com.

    If the protestors had frowned and move on, then how many web surfers would have heard of and visited this website? A few thousand? Getting it noticed by Wired and Slashdot only increased bonsaikitten.com's profile, which means that lots more people got to see what the animal rights fools were trying to supress in the first place...
    --
    You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible
  174. Chinese Rocket Urn?! by grape+jelly · · Score: 1

    Geez. It wouldn't take a genius to figure out that this is friggin' parody. Listed in their available containers is a Chinese Rocket "Urn". Aside from the obvious difficulty of obtaining these shells (especially for sale like this), where would you get a cat big enough to fill that? You'd have to use a Tiger or something!

    http://www.bonsaitiger.com/

  175. Re:la la la by eudas · · Score: 1

    lol i typo'd. 'crpa' should be 'crap'. :P
    now if only slashdot would implement a 'typo filter', the whole site would be more readable. ;)

    eudas

    --
    Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
  176. Tossed into the litterbox by Understudy · · Score: 1

    As the owner of four ferel cats. I am not offended by the site I think it is pretty funny actually. The problem is you have a bunch of old bitties out there that do nothing but live to rescue and work and live with cats. Anybody who does anything slightly offensive to a cat goes on their shit list. Unfortunatly there are a lot of these cat people out there with no lives and nothing better to do then to complain to the government about how they were offended by this individual(s) web site. And these squeky wheels will get greased. Their message boards complain about how this site is becoming famous dispite their efforts. Well duh it was your efforts to report it the government and anybody who would listen to you. All I can say is thanks for spreading the word. I thought is was so funny that I sent the link to user friendly and weird earl.

    The government will now spend your tax dollars and something completly frivolous. Keep it up you idiots, I like my cats but I don't recognize their exsistance as the be all to end all in the universe. Besides I have a shocker for you cat extremists, I also have a dog. That's right dogs and cats living together......mass hysteria. Now go clean your litter box.

  177. Re:Joke? Yeah� Is it obvious to everyone? No� by rking · · Score: 1

    How could this have been avoided altogether while still excercising free speech? With a frickin' discalimer©

    Don't be absurd. You could have a web site genuinely devoted to animal cruelty with a disclaimer to ward off law suits just as easily as you can have a web site that is a joke but doesn't have a disclaimer. If there actually was a case against them based on their content then the existence of a disclaimer should be totally irrelevant.

    If the fact that it is obviously a joke isn't enough then there's no way that some paragraph saying "we didn't mean it, honest" is going to help.

  178. Moral issue by AMuse · · Score: 2

    Once again, this seems to raise the age-old issue of morales vs. freedom of speech.

    In this case, the Federal Government(FBI) is attempting to push the morales of the "Common man"(tm). By making a satire site a federal crime, they're attempting to successfully criminalize freedom of speech on the 'Net.

    In my not-so-humble opinion, this results directly from the always-present push by the majority to make everyone conform to various community morales, be they religious, spiritual or just plain "We hate people who would even think of hurting kittens!".

    I sincerely hope that the FBI does not prosecute, and if so, I sincerely hope that the court finds the owners of bonsaikittens.com wholly innocent. To do anything but is to set a dangerous precedent -- that our rights are rights only as long as they don't offend anyone and aren't strange.


  179. modest proposal by grue23 · · Score: 1

    i'm real interested about the law against depictions of cruelty to animals that is mentioned in the associated article. sounds like a pretty massive first amendment violation.

    sort of ironic there's nothing similar against depictions of violence against humans; the same argument should work for a law for that as well (even fake depictions of violence against humans would encourage others to perform such violence, etc).

    --grue

    1. Re:modest proposal by triticale · · Score: 1

      Note that the law specifies commercial gain. Exploiting images depicting an anvil falling toward the head of a coyote, or said yodel dog holding a stick of dynamite about to explode, would then be an obvious violation. I know for a fact that there is a commercial organization profiting from such images, and the FBI clearly ought to be pursuing them.

  180. Check it out... by xFoz · · Score: 1

    Coming soon. Cat juggling!

  181. Well this is interesting....... by Arminius · · Score: 2

    They change the name of Carnivore the same time that MS changes the name of Whistler.
    Coincidence? I think NOT! :)

    --

    ------
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  182. Re:DCS1000 is already a trademark! by Lughlamfainne · · Score: 1

    I say they should go for it.. sue 'em till it hurts ;)

    --
    .sig under construction
  183. I hope... by zmooc · · Score: 1

    ...they will soon come after me. Too bad I live in the Netherlands:(

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  184. Now this is funny. by Kibo · · Score: 1
    Allanach said she's not sure if the site is a parody -- and even if it isn't, it should be taken offline because it could encourage people to experiment on their own household pets.

    I've owned my share of pets, but only on rare occasions have I tried to force one or more of them into Klein Bottles. Is this really a concern, people who can't differentiate between satire and reality will be able to use the internet to 'prune' kittens into exotic shapes? Appearently the Humane Society has offcially run out of problems, and the FBI crimes. I think we may be able to declare Utopia, and go home. Slightly more seriously, does anyone get tired of seeing these IQ tests in action? I don't. And those gamblin' folks out there might want to start a pool on which of the people in this article will be the first to make the Darwin Awards.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  185. Re:Offensive, but protected by LineNoize · · Score: 1
    I couldn't agree more. I personally don't find the site all that funny. In fact, the detailed descriptions they give are somewhat morbid. I personally prefer satire that it apparent and yet it worries me... Take a look at how many people out there don't "get it". They don't understand it's a morbid, sick, joke. On top of that... how many morbid sick people out there are going to think this is real and possible and attempt it on some poor kitten?

    With that said... I believe Voltaire's dictum applies here:

    "I may disagree with you, but I will defend unto the death your right to say it!"

    Of course... another dictum by Voltaire, not quoted so much is:

    "Common sense isn't very common."

    And that's the part that worries me.

    -LineNoize

    --
    Time flies like an arrow but fruit flies like a bananna.
  186. They wouldn't even need to be edited by donglekey · · Score: 2

    From what I could tell, the pictures didn't need to be altered. At the very most, when a kitten was already in the jar, they could have pushed it from the other end and taken the picture at the same time. That is still a little dicomforting but is really nowhere near animal cruelty.

  187. If you don't like Carnivore/DCS1000 by VC · · Score: 1

    ...use pgp, or hushmail...
    Pretty simple really. Technical, logical solution to a political problem.

  188. Offensive, but protected by bnenning · · Score: 5
    I'm a big cat person. I like them, and they for the most part like me. I get along with them much better than, say, human beings. This site is not funny at all to me, and I can easily understand why people are upset about it. Having said that, I must defend their right to publish this material. There is no right not to be offended, and any law that prohibits mere depictions of animal cruelty is blatantly unconstitutional (much like the fake kiddie porn law).

    Of course, this assumes that there is no actual cruelty occuring. If that is not the case, then an appropriate punishment for those responsible would involve a locked room and several hungry tigers.

    --
    How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    1. Re:Offensive, but protected by TeknoMage · · Score: 1

      Funny, because on my client, it does, so for what
      ever reason, the default isn't getting checked,
      or changed with a toggle I missed somewhere.

    2. Re:Offensive, but protected by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      Of course, this assumes that there is no actual cruelty occuring. If that is not the case, then an appropriate punishment for those responsible would involve a locked room and several hungry tigers.

      And, of course, the tigers are entitled to make a web site with pictures of the hilarity that ensues.


      ---
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  189. Yes I make Klein Bottles. by Cliff+Stoll · · Score: 2
    Is http://www.kleinbottle.com a joke? If so, then the joke's on me.

    For the past 4 or 5 years, I've been making (and selling) 3-dimensional immersions of Klein Bottles. Many mathematicians own them; they assure me that a Klein Bottle can indeed be immersed (but not embedded) in 3-D.

    I thank slashdot readers for their support of my micro-business. I won't get rich as a zero-volume bottle maker, but I'm having plenty of fun.

  190. bansaifbiinvestigator.com by TheWhiteOtaku · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see bansaifbiinvestigator started. That would really up the irony.

    --

    Given a reasonably level playing field, who would win a fight between a bear and a shark?

  191. Carnivore by not_cub · · Score: 2
    A lot of people don't like the idea of Carnivore. One of the arguments against it I see on slashdot goes roughly as follows:

    "With the existing plain old telephone system, the FBI can only tap a few lines at a time. With Carnivore, they can tap everybody's emails all the time, which is unconstitutional/generally bad."

    One of the arguments I see on slashdot for napster runs along the lines:

    "Bloody RIAA. They can't keep the genie in the bottle. New technology allows people to get there hands on loadsa music."

    Now come on people, you can't have it both ways... Is it ok for everybody to exploit new technology as they see fit? FBI included. Or perhaps at least one of these knee-jerk reactions isn't sensible?

    not_cub

    --
    q='echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"';s=\';b=\\;echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"
    1. Re:Carnivore by bnenning · · Score: 2
      Now come on people, you can't have it both ways... Is it ok for everybody to exploit new technology as they see fit? FBI included.

      It's the FBI that wants it both ways; they want to use the latest and greatest spying technologies, but want to deny ordinary citizens the ability to protect their privacy. Carnivore would not be an issue if the FBI and other government agencies had not deliberately crippled the widespread use of encryption.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  192. Ugh. by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 1

    This is so so SO stupid. The really sad part is what happens in the year 2037, when the last of the tree-torturing 'real' bonsai practitioners are rounded up in an FBI sting. (Is 'an' correct in this case, 'an eff-bee-eye sting' or should it be 'a F(ederal)B(ureau of)I(nvestigation) sting'?)

    --
    All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  193. This beats any /. troll by sparcv9 · · Score: 3

    These guys trolled the FBI! I came across the Bonsai Kitten site a while ago, and just by reading the text, I was able too see that this site was a joke. The massive amounts of hate mail this site gets (which was also funneled to a mailing for site fans to read) is just indicative of how many stupid and/or gullible people there are surfing the Web. But for the FBI to take this site seriously, that is just an embarrassment.

    --

    This is not a Fugazi .sig
  194. DCS1000? by TheFlu · · Score: 2
    Destroy Citizen Security 1000 times a day.

    This way to the egress > The Linux Pimp

  195. Re:I heard DCS1000 stands for... by LafinJack · · Score: 1

    You're right. You can rename something but it's still what it is.

    I could call a pile of shit a bed of roses, but that doesn't change the fact that it's a pile of shit.

    --
    we are building a religion
    a limited edition
    we are now accepting callers
    for these pendant key chains
  196. DCS1000 by zenray · · Score: 1

    To paraphrase - a pile of shit by any other name still stinks. Simply changing the name does not make this 'Big Brother' spyware any more acceptiable to me.

    --
    zenray
  197. I heard DCS1000 stands for... by VValdo · · Score: 3

    Disguised Carnivore System

    Ie, I'm not going to let them get away with that name change.

    W
    -------------------

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  198. The Sad thing here by jjr · · Score: 1

    Is that the Government is trying to to control to much of our life in the United States and that is exactly why this country was founded because of a Government who was trying to control thier people in an unfair way. Most people do not care that our rights are getting trambled on because they are more worried about seeing thier next car payment to worry about these things.

  199. Bonsai Kitten by Mongoose · · Score: 1

    I don't know why Americans fear exotic forms of art. Don't be so xenophobic! I have a set trapeziodal prism and cubic kittens, so they can't roll off my desk and get hurt. I was going to get a conical and a half shpere kitty set, but I was afraid they would roll under the couch and get lost.

    As the creator of a 3d modeler I enjoy the geometeric beauty of my perfectly cubic and trapeziodal kitties. They great for travelers as well, since they fit perfectly in carry-on boxes and they're even stackable! The kids enjoy them more than legos...

  200. A joke? by TBadiuk · · Score: 1

    People thought J. Dalhmer's posts about eating people to usenet were a joke too. Whoops.

    Would it really have hurt them to put a "this is a parody" disclaimer at the bottom of the site?

    I first saw the site when www.memepool.com linked to it a while back. I wasn't sure if it was a parody or not, and I'm pretty jaded. I guess it all boils down to responsibility.

    If I had a "how to kill your neighbours" site and posted (faked) pictures, do you think I should get investigated? Maybe a we should consider people reporting crimes to 911 as just 'pranks' to?

    Were do you draw the line?

    Ted

    1. Re:A joke? by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      >Would it really have hurt them to put a "this is a parody"
      >disclaimer at the bottom of the site?

      Hindsight is always 20/20. They'll think twice about that next time - or maybe not. There's no notice up there yet, and I assume they still have control of the site.

      >If I had a "how to kill your neighbours" site and posted (faked)
      >pictures, do you think I should get investigated?

      Of course not. Have you done a websearch for the Anarchist's Cookbook lately? "How to make a pipe bomb" and "How to burn through asphalt with iron filings and a match" are mirrored about a jillion times. Should they be investigated?

      >Were do you draw the line?

      See above. For every copy of "How to make a pipe bomb" there's probably five websites selling fireworks, willing to ship to any address in the US. And for every pyrotechnics company on the web, there are probably ten times as many knife dealers. Just because something could be dangerous doesn't mean it is - yet, unfortunately, we're getting to a point where people *expect* the government to step in "just in case."

      I think common sense ought to dictate where to draw the line, but clearly that's not what's happening (e.g. Starcraft clan busted, 6 year old with chicken finger arrested). When you make a practice of investigating everything, you'll never get anywhere... But I guess that's our government in a nutshell these days.

      Shaun

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  201. Not to mention... by ShaunC · · Score: 1

    All those roadkill pictures at steakandcheese have got to go. Quick, somebody get me the number for the FBI! That flattened squirrel is a clear sign of drivers' disregard for animals, and the perpetrators must be prosecuted at once. We don't take Interstate Trafficking of Dead Animal Pictures lightly 'round these parts.

    Shaun

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  202. Free speech... wait... WHAT? by MongooseCN · · Score: 1
    How does condeming the content of this site have anything to do with free speech?? Personally if these people really are sticking cats in jars then they should personally be crammed into a jar like so and the site taken off line. Now while I do believe in free speech, the problem with a site like this is that to take the picture would involve injuring an animal, and physically injuring animals to take an amusing photo is not free speech! If it was computer generated or faked properly then I don't really care if it's up or not if it makes a few people happy.

    Also another problem with these kinds of sites is that even if this content was not intended to be real, there are always idiots in this world that will think it is real and really try it.

  203. Re:Sigh... by Ig0r · · Score: 1

    That would be a bit messy if you actually tried to fit a cat inside a klein bottle.

    --

    --
    Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
  204. I do hope that was a parody by StarTux · · Score: 1

    I knew it was going to be bad, and it was ...

    To phrase the immortal words of Queen Victoria:

    "We are not amused"

    If its not a parody I hope he end up in jail and that they yank his website down.

    I do believe in freedom, but thats not expression in freedom, but an expression in cruelty.

    Still even if its a parody I do not find it humorous at all.

    1. Re:I do hope that was a parody by Skyhawk_Dreamer · · Score: 5

      No it is not a parody. It is called "satire". But regardless if you have never heard this term, I'm really trying to get a handle on the degree of stupidity necessary for one to truely believe the US Government issues Kitticulture Permits for the express purpose of "shaping" kittens by inserting them into Klein jars that have no opening using a shoehorn. Is the government secrety contaminating the water again?

      Remember back in your younger days when we all had to read A Modest Proposal by Jonathan Swift, http://art-bin.com/art/omodest.html where the author proposes the solution of cooking and eating Irish babies? There was no indication that this was a "satire" making fun of lessor proposals at that time to deal with the Irish "problem".

      I suggest learning what satire is, and how it has been used in literature, art, and media for ages. The Bonsai Kitten site makes fun of those who wish to twist, shape, and modify nature to suite our whims and convenience - even our vanity!!

  205. Try this pic by ShaunC · · Score: 2

    http://shat.net/bonsaifbi.jpg

    Disclaimer: that poor sap is not an FBI agent (that I know of). I found him on that "Am I a total raving dork, or not? Why don't I put my ugly mug in front of thousands of people!" site, glass bottle courtesy essentialsupplies.com. There, now I can't be sued.

    Shaun

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  206. Eh. It was pretty weak. by dave-fu · · Score: 1

    They didn't even show her pissing on her commander.
    Gator Bait is a better watch altogether.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
  207. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  208. Dude, where's my cat ? by FurryLogic · · Score: 1

    Everyone oughtta know from ACME physics that a cat will assume the shape of its container... at least i grew up knowing this.

    wurd.
    -fl

  209. Sigh... by kaphka · · Score: 4
    Count the FBI among the many visitors to bonsaikitten.com who are anything but amused at the descriptions of how to use muscle relaxant, feeding tubes and Klein bottles to shape a perfect Bonsai Cat.
    For those of you who aren't clued in (i.e. the FBI and Wired, apparently,) Klein bottles cannot exist in our universe. That kinda makes it unlikely that they are being used to abuse kittens.

    Er, since I'm addressing the humor-impaired, I should probably point out that http://www.kleinbottle.com is a joke as well.
    --

    MSK

    1. Re:Sigh... by AaronStJ · · Score: 3
      Er, since I'm addressing the humor-impaired, I should probably point out that http://www.kleinbottle.com is a joke as well.

      Err, are you sure. His website makes it fairly clear that he really is selling Klein bottles:

      Are you serious, or is this some kind of joke?

      I do sell glass Klein Bottles. I fill orders quickly and guarantee satisfaction. Over a hundred presumably happy mathematicians now own my Klein Bottles.

      He explains all about the topology of a klein bottle, admits that what he makes aren't klein bottles in the truest sense, but merely a 3d immersion of a klein bottle. I'd have to say that you're wrong, this guy really is seelinf klein bottles. And he even accepts paypal.
      --
      Stupid like a fox!
    2. Re:Sigh... by eudas · · Score: 1

      what exactly is a klein bottle?

      eudas

      --
      Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
    3. Re:Sigh... by kaphka · · Score: 1
      He explains all about the topology of a klein bottle, admits that what he makes aren't klein bottles in the truest sense, but merely a 3d immersion of a klein bottle. I'd have to say that you're wrong, this guy really is seelinf klein bottles. And he even accepts paypal.
      I know, I wasn't really clear about that... He is selling something, but they're not actually Klein bottles. Anyway, it's still a joke, in that it's obvious that the site is primarily intended to be humorous.
      --

      MSK

    4. Re:Sigh... by Detritus · · Score: 3
      Three dimensional version of a moebius strip.

      See this page.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  210. I better remove my Cat BBQ Page !!! by tarbabyxxxx · · Score: 1
    Well I have taken down the pictures of me and my friends at our annual Cat BBQ. I wouldn't want the FBI to track me down and put me in prison.

    Carnivorie has been renamed to the Dynamic Cat Snoop 1000!

    Get a life people!

    --
    Will the last company to abandon Linux please turn off the lights??!
  211. Sentiment in literature by blonde+rser · · Score: 3

    Salinger sights R. H. Blyth's definition of sentimentallity as "when we give to a thing more tenderness than God gives to it." Salinger's example is then given as "God undoubtedly loves kittens, but not, in all probability, with Technicolor booties on their paws."

    (try not to get too caught up in the word God... this does not have to be a religious statement) Basicly all I'm trying to say with Salinger's words (because he does have the ability to be a lot more straight forward than myself) is that when it comes to kittens many people lose the ability to observe things rationally. But before you judge these people too hard think if you do the same thing yourself. Did Pay it Forward "move" you? Or did you believe that Traffic was a "powerful" movie?

    If so then you have fallen for the same crime. Pay it Forward seemed to move you because it kills a child in the last 5 minutes which the audience responds to with sentiment. And Traffic associates itself with a very important argument but in itself does not have a strong plot, characters, or pasing but because we see strength in the argument we see strengths in the movie which simply aren't there. All I'm trying to point out is that we all show a lack of objectivity at times when it comes to sentiment but that doesn't mean we should be chastized for it. Ofcourse there are those who will over react to images of kittens so lets point out their error and move on. And maybe we can even learn from their mistakes.

    Ofcourse if they try to defend themselves then we can flame them.

  212. la la la by eudas · · Score: 1
    "It's totally promoting animal cruelty," Allanach said. "They consider it a sick joke. People will take it seriously. Animal cruelty is not funny. Animal torture is not funny. We would like bonsaikitten.com to be removed permanently."
    they won't even give us credit for being intelligent enough to define parody, humor, or cruelty for ourselves. i'm insulted, and offended. it's totally promoting knee jerk responses from the public. i consider this statement to be a sick joke. people will take it seriously. this kind of political crpa is not funny. i would like their rights to free speech to be removed permanently.

    eudas
    --
    Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
  213. You don't get it, do you? by megaduck · · Score: 1
    Actually, I think that you're missing the point. Information technology is neither good nor bad, it's just a tool. The outrage over carnivore stems from the chosen use of that tool.

    I think Napster is good because it allows people to freely spread music. I think Carnivore is bad because it restricts my right to free speech and free assembly. It's essentially the same tool, but a totally different use, and therefore gets a different reaction.

    --
    This .sig for rent.
  214. Re:Hey now... by kaphka · · Score: 1
    Kleinbottle.com isn't a joke. They do indeed deliver fine, hand-crafted 3D immersions of 4D Klein bottles. I'm happy to report that the non-orientability of the bottle is unaffected by the lack of a fourth dimension.
    Yeah, I knew somebody would call me on that. However, although I don't really have the topology credentials to justify being this picky, it's my understanding that the things sold on that site are not real Klein bottles.
    --

    MSK

  215. Does this work with dogs? by Anonymous+Cowturd · · Score: 1

    Bonsai puppies?

    I guess we'll have to see if we can fit carnivore into a mason jar...

    --


    if 'fruits de mer' = seafood
    does 'fruits de merde' = mushrooms?
  216. Mirror that site! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.cruel.com/sub/bonsaikitten.zip

  217. it's funny. period. by thex23 · · Score: 3
    This is from the bonsaikitty.com site:

    At only a few weeks of age, a kitten's bones have not yet hardened and become osseous. They are extremely soft and springy. In fact, if you take a week-old kitten and throw it to the floor, it will actually bounce! We do not recommend that you try this at home. The kitten may bounce under the furniture and be difficult to retrieve, as well as covered in unsightly household dust

    I actually laughed out loud when I read this. I mean, come ON! How stupid do you have to be not to see this is a joke? Could it be any more deadpan?

    And I don't for a second buy the argument that parody invites people to harm their pets. The REAL problem with pets these days are owners who don't take care of them properly, let them get hurt, breed indescriminately, and generally treat them as poorly as they treat their human pets, er.. children.

    I found cat-drowing scenes in the movie Gummo to be truly disturbing, but I didn't for a SECOND think that the film should be banned and the producers brought to trial. How ridiculous!

    The animal rights people can't develop a functioning sense of humour, they should at least be a little more tolerant.
    The FBI needs to get a fucking grip.

    We thieves, we liars, we vandals, and poets. Networked agents of Cthulhu Borealis.

  218. Once Again by Bluesee · · Score: 2

    I simply cannot believe that the FBI has subpoenaed this site.

    But, to them, this may look a lot like that old 'Date Rape' site that gave tips and helpful hints on how to get your girl down (should be illiegal? ask your judge). Or perhaps they could put it in the same category as virtual kiddie porn (I think this should be illegal, but thats my opinion).

    You know, 'we're not judges, we can't tell if its illegal or not, let's just appease the meowies of the world by doing what we do best: harrassing the crap out of people we don't like.'

    People need to lighten up, and the FBI needs to stop supporting such tight-sphincter behavior. If I was the site owner, I wouldn't worry, but if this man is prosecuted for Anything, we all should protest.

    On a side note, troll technology was developed right here in /. laboratories, so we can all feel proud of ourselves. In my opinion, flames, trolls, bonsai kittens, and natalieportmanhotgritsdinnerplatesizedgoat pics are

    "The Cost of Doing Business in a Free America"

    but Carnivore and Echelon shouldn't be.

    --
    SDMI: Finally! Music that won't rip or burn! Brought to you by the fine folks at RIAA.
  219. Cat-Scan.com by Myriad · · Score: 1

    Heheh, reminds me a lot of Cat Scan, a site dedicated to stuffing your kitty into a flatbed and hitting the scan button.

    There are some pretty hilarious pictures from the original contest that started it all (near the bottom of the page).

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  220. Hey now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kleinbottle.com isn't a joke. They do indeed deliver fine, hand-crafted 3D immersions of 4D Klein bottles. I'm happy to report that the non-orientability of the bottle is unaffected by the lack of a fourth dimension.

  221. Stupid question by Mr.roboto · · Score: 1

    In the article it mentions that "It isn't because we were worried about negative privacy publicity. If it was, we would have changed (the name) months ago," Why change the name at all then if you aren't concerned? "Carnivore" will stick I bet, regardless of whatever it's renamed.

    --
    Don't call my crazy, that's what they called me back in the home!
  222. I've got an email to send to the FBI by Phil+the+Canuck · · Score: 1
    It goes something like this:

    YHBT, YHL, HAND.

  223. Hypocrites, all... by coupland · · Score: 2

    "It's totally promoting animal cruelty," Allanach said. "They consider it a sick joke. People will take it seriously. Animal cruelty is not funny."

    And how many of the same people watch TV shows where cops shoot at bad guys or people drive recklessly? It's not entertainment, people will take it seriously! Entertainment is wrong because someone, somewhere will take it seriously. Fun is a sickness, I say!


    ---
  224. Joke? Yeah� Is it obvious to everyone? No� by torinth · · Score: 1

    So©©© here's the tricky part©©© Is bonsaikitten©com a parody? Yeah© Most of us tech-head-humor people see that immediately©

    Does everyone see that? Nope© There's a good lot of reasonable people out there that are convinced that the internet is the publishing house all things evil and unholy© They're very skeptical and cautious of things that aren't right being published on the web© Animal Cruelty is one of those things©©©

    Can you blame them for caution? No©

    Can you blame them for ignorance? Probably© At least a little© But there's alot of people out there who are ignorant of alot of different things© It's pretty excussable©

    What's the FBI doing in this case? Investigating© They're not shutting the site down with no grounds, they're investigating© People don't believe that bonsaikittens©com is a joke, and you are not going to be able to convince them that© The only people that probably can are an authority of some sort© In this case the FBI©

    How could this have been avoided altogether while still excercising free speech? With a frickin' discalimer© If you want to say or depict something inflammatory, but untrue, it is your responsibility to disclaim that falseness© It doesn't mean putting a big tag at the top of every page saying "This is fake©"© A nice little discalimer in an 'about' page or something would do fine© People who become upset with what you have to say can at least verify that it isn't true©

    Don't you remember that old civics class lesson about how rights come with responsibility? Then quit whining and take responsibility for deluding people©

    -Andrew

  225. ...or funny as hell but yuck! by Interrobang · · Score: 1

    I just told my cat (Markus Clawdius Aurelius Nero) that I was going to put him in a jar and turn him into a pretzel. He was so disgusted with the idea that he rolled over so I could scratch his tummy.

    I'm so disgusted with the site that I can't seem to stop giggling, and saying "Yuuck!" (Nuttin' like a little Stephen King style "going for the gross-out" to liven up one's evening, sez I.)

    ?!

  226. PETA will be next by sharkey · · Score: 2

    The FBI will be going after People Eating Tasty Animals next, even though that site was raped by Network Solutions years ago, and hasn't had an update since 1996.

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  227. The article is part of the prank, right? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2
    OK, so we all know that Bonsaikitten is a prank site. Who else here belives that the article is also part of the prank, and that Declan McCullagh is either part of, or was fooled by, the prank. If it IS part of the prank, Dr. Michael Wong Chang is doing pretty well so far.

    I'm gonna have to take this one with a huge friggen grain of salt.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  228. DCS1000 by drivers · · Score: 2

    DCS1000, not to be confused with the Kodak DCS 660 Digital Camera