Slashdot Mirror


Creating A Tiny, Free, Roaming Webcam?

vitus979 asks: "Every year there is a big 7 day bicycle ride in Iowa called RAGBRAI (Register's Annual Great Bike Ride Across Iowa), and an interesting problem was put in front of me and I'm looking for the best solution: make an extremely lightweight, self-contained webcam system fully independent of a base station, but yet able to upload pics to a file server from nearly any location in the state of Iowa to be shown on a website in realtime."

"I thought it would be cool to mount a webcam on my bike when I go this July. I looked around on the web and the only similar implementations I could find included a bike trailer and 20lbs worth of computer parts. I know that a person can do better than that. I'll be at least 5 miles from a support van at any time so short range solutions (Bluetooth, 2.4ghz wireless LAN) isn't an option unfortunately. What I'm looking into is a small webcam linked to a PDA with a cellular modem. The webcam takes pictures every couple of minutes and the PDA takes the image, calls on the cell modem, uploads the pic, and disconnects the call. This saves me cellular charges and conserves power so that I don't have to carry a bunch of batteries with me.

Basically I've gotten to the point that I need a firm set of hardware and a good wireless implementation to get the information to the servers. Below is what I will need for the system. Any suggestions for each piece, or a full working system that could be purchased would be very helpful.

Webcam: the smaller and more power efficient the better, something all weather, the size and shape of a pen would be optimal since aerodynamics play a part in this piece and I don't want something like a Logitech QuickCam stuck to my helmet.

Computer: PDA sized or smaller if possible. Needs to be able to connect to both a Webcam and a Cellular Modem and be able to do the work explained above. As power efficient as possible, the longest lasting batteries possible. Needs to fit in bicycling jersey pocket (about 4 inches wide and 8 inches deep).

Modem: this is problematic as not all of Iowa is covered for digital cellular service but all of Iowa IS covered for analog at least. Another option may be the recently reinstated Iridium system (I read somewhere they allowed data transfers)."

163 comments

  1. Enjoy it, but remember... by JasonSkywalker · · Score: 1

    All your first post belong to us.

    --
    I have Unix underpants.
  2. Simple enough by zTTTz · · Score: 2

    All you really need to pull this off is a really long piece of Cat-5 (and given that this is going to be in Iowa, you may need to bribe the Cat-5 so it doesn't crimp itself to death out of sheer boredome).

    1. Re:Simple enough by l33t+j03 · · Score: 1
      That would work. If he planned to bike no more than 100 meters from his server. He would be better off with a strand of fiber.

      Anyway, congratulations on contributing to the discussion. You've at least spent as much time thinking about it as the author of the article did. Here is a guy who says that he has 'gotten as far as' figuring out in his head what the optimal setup would be (even given some thought to an aerodynamic camera). Yet he goes no further than writing an Ask Slashdot.

      Type damn 'wireless camera' into Google for crying out loud.

    2. Re:Simple enough by PD · · Score: 1

      But it's nothing like what you can do with a twisted pair.

    3. Re:Simple enough by Edax+Rarem · · Score: 1

      See the next /. post....you'll find all the answers you need.

      --
      I hate my sig.
    4. Re:Simple enough by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      Just to clarify-- RAGBRAI is not a race, it just a 7 day ride across the state of Iowa. (True racers can get across the country in I think 8 days) The reason a webcam might be interesting to watch is because much of the time is not spent actually riding. There are street parties, dances, and other entertainments in every town. With current technology it wouldn't be really riveting to view occasional uploaded photos, but soon it may be possible to show full motion video with sound. That might be very interesting, especially for people who cannot ride anymore, are housebound, or might be thinking of riding sometime in the future. People come from all over the US and even a few from abroad to ride RAGBRAI, believe it or not. There are people who might not think that riding a bicycle 500 miles is worth watching, but there sure are a lot of people who think that watching a car go in circles the same distance is... For more info on this year's RAGBRAI, see http://www.ragbrai.org

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  3. Hmm... by suwain_2 · · Score: 2

    ... Check out Axis. They don't exactly offer tiny cameras, but they *do* meet most of the other criteria. (Not sure how they're powered; I'd guess it's AC...)
    ________________________________________________

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    1. Re:Hmm... by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 2

      They use a 12v wall wart :-) but I have heard stories of them running off solar. The only model they make that would be close whould be the Axis 2120. Its smallish fairly rugged but most important uses an auto-iris lens. The 2100 might last outside but bright outdoorlight will cook the CCD. The camera can hook to a modem and can be setup to send pics on a schedual.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  4. Who is going to want to watch this? by SuperDuperMan · · Score: 1

    Before you go to the effort and expense of putting something like this together maybe you should figure out if you are even going to have an audience. I doubt that live pictures will be necessary even for those interested in seeing the pictures. Just capture pictures and save them then upload them toa server later. Just because it can be done doesn't mean it should be done.

    1. Re:Who is going to want to watch this? by vslashg · · Score: 2
      I doubt that live pictures will be necessary even for those interested in seeing the pictures.

      Come on. Since when have webcams ever been about necessity? Webcams exist because of the "hey, neat" factor. It's not necessary to see live pictures on Jennicam, either, but I doubt it'd get the same audience if the pictures were taken ahead of time and presented in a big lump at the first of every month.

      This is a really cool idea for a webcam, just because it's something different, and in the world of webcams, different means interesting. (I've watched webcams for fifteen minutes straight, amazed that anybody thought someone would sit down and watch them for fifteen minutes straight. I'm pretty sure that's the *POINT* of them.)

  5. Visor? by FortKnox · · Score: 2

    Sounds like you may want to talk to visor about it. They make the handspring PDA. They don't have what you speak of, but they may be able to make it for you.
    I'm assuming you have a large budget, btw.

    --

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Visor? by airship · · Score: 3

      Pretty easy, really. (1) Handspring Visor. (2) Eyemodule2 digital camera Springboard expansion module for Visor. (3) Visor-compatible cell phone. (4) Cable to connect Visor to cell phone. (5) Mount the works on your handlebars with a couple of homemade clamp-up arrangements. (6) Set the eyemodule software to take pix at the required intervals. (7) Stop every dozen pix or so and upload via the cell phone. Go to www.visorcentral.com and get on the discussion boards for technical help in getting this set up. Good luck! -A fellow Iowan.

      --
      Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  6. Palm Pilot by KirTakat · · Score: 2

    Okay, I can't find the information right now, but I know that best buy used to sell a Palm Pilot camera, maybe something like that, on a palm VIIx would provide the solution. As for the aerodynamics of it, I would suggest strapping it to your chest w/ the lens tilted upwards. Now then, for the calling and disconnecting you might need to do a bit of search for software that can do it, or even possibly writing it yourself if you know how. Sorry I can't be more discreptive.

    --
    /* Of course I'm real, but can you prove it? */
    1. Re:Palm Pilot by KirTakat · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I forgot to add something (I know, I know, you should always preview first...). Something as simple as a shrinkwrapped plastic could keep it weather proof..

      --
      /* Of course I'm real, but can you prove it? */
  7. Campy or ShimaNO? by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

    The data transfer is the hard part, but you could do it with a small linux PC like some of the posts last week, running off a Nightrider type battery in the Bottle cage. Some of these brick type computers have big harddrives, and you could just spool and forward when you can. X-10.com has some cool mini cams that can run on USB, and could fit wedged in a helmet vent.

    PS. Don't worry about the drag, just shave your legs or lose 5 pounds ;->

    --
    Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  8. Re:Not to be rude by napalm381 · · Score: 1

    Do you know what RAGBRAI is? Have you ever been on it? The idea of getting away from it and unplugging on RAGBRAI is laughable. Over 10,000 people on bikes, plus a few thousand more driving vans, bike store employees, etc. It's on the front page of the Des Moines Register (the "R" in RAGBRAI) every day for a week. This is just one more step in the media coverage of the event.

  9. *My* ideal solution by Raptor+CK · · Score: 5

    You should look into PC/104 and other miniaturized PC systems for this. All you'll end up needing is USB support for a D-Link camera, and PCMCIA for your modem (only 1 type II if you use the Merlin or Sierra AirCard).

    That's only two modules, perhaps just one. There may be other solutions as well that you can look into. Since you don't seem to need video output as well for this, a serial console would be ideal, and you wouldn't need it to be hooked up all the time anyway.

    Finally, the disconnect for CDPD will only be needed to save battery power. Most service plans are unlimited service, not per kilobyte, unless you're roaming.

    Here's your USB cam:
    http://www.dlink.com/products/usb/dsbc300/

    With proper mounting (think about shockmounting and using a flash chip for storage, it'll be a lot more durable) on the bike frame, the profile will be fairly small.

    For even more insanity, you can use an ultralight subnote like a Libretto (with a USB card) or a VAIO PictureBook, depending on OS support. This would be easier to get on short notice, of course, but you'd need someone to supply you with batteries.

    Best of luck!
    Raptor

    --
    Raptor
    "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    1. Re:*My* ideal solution by suwain_2 · · Score: 2
      Hmm... Sounds good.

      What I still want to know is how you're going to be taking the images. I'd tend to think that they would come out blurry unless it took a *very* quick image. Plus, if you were turning, it would be even worse.

      I personally would give this some consideration before proceeding, as I'd hate for you to spend months making a super-cool camera, and then have every single image come out blurry...
      ________________________________________________

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:*My* ideal solution by technos · · Score: 2

      Libretto? Naw. There's no battery life to them.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    3. Re:*My* ideal solution by Raptor+CK · · Score: 2

      As a Libretto owner, wtf?

      Ok, so it doesn't get the battery life that my old Acer Nuovo did (10 hours... now *that's* power management). The 110CT, the current heavyweight US Libretto can get 4 hours on a single high-capacity battery. It's called APM, dude. Set the drive to spin down, auto-off LCD (the backlight's a real drain), and keep brightness at a minimum. I've been able to play MP3's off of it for 4 hours straight while occasionally logging on via CDPD on a bus. Once I shut down, I still had a good 25% left. That's enough battery life for me. Admittedly, I also bought a spare battery just in case, but I can't remember the last time I actually needed it. It's far from wearable-class battery life, but it's not bad. Granted, I haven't tested a USB cam, but the more you keep from using the hard drive, the better off you'll end up with using a Libretto (especially if you have one).

      Now the PictureBook, I haven't met a single person who got decent batterylife from it. Please, *please* prove me wrong on the non-Crusoe powered model. Built-in cameras are cool :-)

      Raptor

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    4. Re:*My* ideal solution by technos · · Score: 2

      Actually, I have a NEC Ready, runs on a MediaGx, dinky little 640x480 LCD. One fully charged battery will play mp3s for two hours with the backlight *on* and PCMCIA Ether, without I can get up to six. On the *standard* battery, not the high-cap. I've had a few company issued Librettos, and I haven't been able to get nearly that sort of life out of them. They barely do better than Dells offerings, at least in my experience.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    5. Re:*My* ideal solution by Fred_A · · Score: 1
      Now the PictureBook, I haven't met a single person who got decent batterylife from it. Please, *please* prove me wrong on the non-Crusoe powered model. Built-in cameras are cool :-)

      Sorry, can't prove you wrong there. I only get about an hour off my picturebook's (Intel PII version) battery, be it in Linux or Windows.

      It is anough for the kind of use I make of it and I still love that little machine. I'm still considering getting one of the extended batteries for it though...

      However it still might be a solution worth looking into for the problem at hand... Maybe it can be powered off the dynamo :)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  10. For power, what about a dynamo? by influensa · · Score: 2
    Ok, so I'm science stupid, but it my universe this seems like it would be somewhat plausible:

    I've seen bike lights that are powered by the motion of some part of the bike (ie. the wheel, or collecting wind motion maybe) so the light is actually being powered by the person, no batteries required. Of course, a PDA and cell phone are going to require a lot more electricty.

    But what if the telecom/webcam was working off of a rechargeable battery, that while being drained is also being fed by the motion of the bike, and perhaps also solar power (because any energy collected off of the biker's effort will slow them down I guess).

    Realistically, the solar/kinetic battery recharging won't be enough, but it could be enough to keep it running all day until nighttime (or whenever the biker is resting) when it could be plugged into the wall for a complete charge?

    Alternative energy rocks!

    --


    Jeremy McNaughton

    ------ Live simply so that others may simply live.

    1. Re:For power, what about a dynamo? by suwain_2 · · Score: 1
      You may be "science stupid", but you've got a good idea!

      Now, I'm car stupid, but don't cars charge their battery off of the movement of the axle, or something to that effect? I've seen exercise bikes hooked up to power a 6x6 panel of 100 Watt lightbulbs; I think you should have more than enough power to run a small camera and a cellular modem. I don't know that you would *need* the battery, although it would be foolish not to have one -- suppose you stopped for a minute.

      Now, the one issue is that if you're racing or anything, it may require a little extra effort. (Maybe not)
      ________________________________________________

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:For power, what about a dynamo? by Stavr0 · · Score: 2
      Now, I'm car stupid, but don't cars charge their battery off of the movement of the axle, or something to that effect?

      The alternator is run straight off the engine belt that powers the water pump, cooling fan and AC if you have it.
      ---

    3. Re:For power, what about a dynamo? by boristdog · · Score: 1

      I don't see why a palm cam with a cell phone modem couldn't be powered by a solar cell. What do you think the energy density of those 4 AAA batteries is, anyway? 'Tain't much. A small generator would also work fine, but those little bastards add a lot of effort to your pedaling. Why not just a D battery adapter for the palm & cell? Have someone give you a new set every 6 or 8 hours. Or run the whole thing off a motorcycle battery (~10lbs for a small one) which should last all damn day.

    4. Re:For power, what about a dynamo? by CodeShark · · Score: 2
      No, cars charge their batteries via an alternator, which is driven by the engine via a rubber belt.

      As far as using a dynamo on the wheel, it wouldn't work really well because in most cases the voltage fluctuates too much based on the rider's speed, thus requiring additional electrical conditioning equipment and weight, and would in all probability tire the rider out very quickly if he/she intended to keep the whole setup powered throughout the day.

      The best probably power scenario is for a small solar panel (30cm^2 or so) positioned relative to the bike's motion to provide a minimum amount of drag.

      --
      ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
    5. Re:For power, what about a dynamo? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      You bring up a good point. I had an old schwinn with a light on it that was powered by a small dynamo used the back wheel to generate power. It really increased the pedal power required for a given speed, much like riding uphill on a flat surface.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    6. Re:For power, what about a dynamo? by K-Man · · Score: 2

      Get a hub dynamo. The Schmidt Nabendynamo is considered to be one of the most efficient ones around; I rode a century last year with mine. Granted it was turned off, but the extra friction is about the same on or off. When it's on it gets 3W AC, and can double to 6W by changing the resistance of the load. I've gotten to where I can feel a slight resistance when it's on, but it's on the order of a percent or two of my energy output.

      There are plenty of bike geeks who build electrical devices; the bikecurrent list, which served as a forum for all sorts of bike electronics on cyclery.com, recently died a dot-com death, but you can do a search on that term and find archives, or where it's moved.

      --
      ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
    7. Re:For power, what about a dynamo? by bmasel · · Score: 1

      Only run the dynamo when going downhill.

      --
      Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
    8. Re:For power, what about a dynamo? by ekapus · · Score: 1

      It's iowa, what hill?

    9. Re:For power, what about a dynamo? by bmasel · · Score: 1
      --
      Ben Masel: 51,282 votes for US Senate in the Wisconsin Democratic Primary
  11. Re:Why real-time? by napalm381 · · Score: 1

    Try 7 days, with between 3 and 10 stops a day, mileage varying between 50 and 100 miles a day. Your memory appears to have faded a bit since you were a paperboy. ;)

  12. Pantscam by seanmeister · · Score: 5
    The hardware described at Alison's PantsCam looks like a good starting point. You'll still have to deal with wireless connectivity though..

    (Damn, she just took the cam out of her pants!!)


    Sean

    1. Re:Pantscam by Judg3 · · Score: 1

      WOW!
      Is this the first pair of pants to be Slashdotted?

      ----------------------------------

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    2. Re:Pantscam by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      Is this the first pair of pants to be Slashdotted?

      If it's not, it's probably the first pair of pants to be slashdotted twice

    3. Re:Pantscam by seanmeister · · Score: 3
      Note to vitus979 - do not attempt to pedal bicycle with camera in pants!!


      Sean

    4. Re:Pantscam by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 1

      Hey you stole this, I said it in the chat room in her pants first!!!! Give me some credit!!!

    5. Re:Pantscam by Judg3 · · Score: 1

      Was that you? heheh
      Yeah, he said it in her pants first.

      ----------------------------------

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    6. Re:Pantscam by stickyc · · Score: 1

      Uhoh, I think we've just slashdotted a woman's pants.

  13. And you want it for free, right? by weasel · · Score: 1


    Sure, smaller is better but smaller is also more expensive. Your requirements seem to add up to a rather expensive package. I don't think Ask Slashdot is going to be much help here...

  14. Ham Radio? by suwain_2 · · Score: 2
    Modem: this is problematic as not all of Iowa is covered for digital cellular service but all of Iowa IS covered for analog at least. Another option may be the recently reinstated Iridium system (I read somewhere they allowed data transfers)."

    There's always ham radio... This, of course, requires that you obtain a valid license. But in the ham community, your request wouldn't be at all unusual.

    However, another problem is that if you plan on mass-producing this, you'd need to force everyone who will use it to get a license before they can legally use it.

    Here's another solution. Put a fairly good amount of storage capacity in it. If the cellular modem is out of range, it will save the image, and try again in a couple minutes. It will continue this until it can transmit the saved images. In the event that it runs out of space, it will delete every other one, or something to that effect. (Doing every other image ensures that the timing is consistent between pictures.)
    ________________________________________________

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  15. Re:Why real-time? by OlympicSponsor · · Score: 1

    I have to admit, it was a LONG time ago. And I never participated...just read about it while I was dropping the papers off.
    --
    Non-meta-modded "Overrated" mods are killing Slashdot

    --
    Non-meta-modded "Overrated" mods are killing Slashdot
    (Hey Ryan! Here's your proof!)
  16. Re:Yes, but... by Telex4 · · Score: 1

    Nice to see some constructive comments as usual. I wonder how many posts it takes before you get a useful answer to this guy's perfectly valid question?

  17. HAM by trippd6 · · Score: 1

    Have you thougth about using HAM radio and packet modems? I don't know much about the technologies, although I know it will work at ranges up to 50 miles...

    -Tripp

    1. Re:HAM by suwain_2 · · Score: 2
      I'm a ham radio operator myself, figured I'd explain a bit.

      First, "HAM" doens't have to be in all caps. This is a common misconception, I guess... I don't know any hams who capitalize it "HAM". (A similar phenomonen occurs with people who don't use Linux, and label it as "LINUX") It's not really *wrong*, it's just a pet peeve of mine.

      Anyway, another misconception is that ham radio always goes around the world. It depends on a number of factors, but the fact is that a common ham radio handheld will not go around the world. However, "repeater" sites are very common -- they repeat your signal at a much higher power, from a great location. Thus, a user on a low-powered "HT" (handheld) could still have his voice heard for hundreds of miles.

      I have never actually used packet, but it is possible to achieve great distances with this, also.

      One additional note... You will, of course, need a license to transmit. And you can't use it for commercial purposes.

      Yaesu has just come out with nifty new "rig", the FT-817. This little radio transmits on the "HF" ('shortwave') bands, and can, theoretically, be heard anywhere in the world.

      Also, PSK31 is extremely popular. I don't know about using it for images; I'm not in a position to comment on it. I don't know if they have an official site, but PSK31.com is a very informative site.

      For those interested, here are a few additional ham-radio related links.

      ARRL: excellent resources for those interested in ham radio

      Kantronics, one of the larger makers of TNCs ['packet modems']

      "73" (Ham term for 'best regards')
      ________________________________________________

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    2. Re:HAM by N3MCB · · Score: 1

      Packet would be way too slow for this, however I would think a fastscan TV signal could be sent back to a base station and then a tv capture card could take the snapshots. The usual TV frequencies for amateurs (technically if the mode is allowed on the band you can use any frequency, but there are voluntay band plans that set specific freq's for various things) align on cable channel 58 (427.25) and 61 or 62 but may differ in your area. The only rules based problem with this is part 97 does not allow broadcasting, so this has to be part of some type of 2-way communication. Both sides don't have to be transmitting video but it can't be soley 1 way.

    3. Re:HAM by k9nl · · Score: 1

      BUT IT CAN...

      One way communications may be acceptable if intended for the amateur community. Simply relaying this to yourself and other amateurs would almost be close to acceptable. Just don't be broadcasting to the public, and make sure no one is making money from your transmissions, unless it is another amateur in a one-time (read "not regularly occurring") exchange of radio equipment.

      You may want to give Riley Hollingsworth (please excuse me if I spelled his name wrong) or another FCC attorney a call, or maybe the ARRL can help you too. Do call one of them to discuss the legalities.

      I would suggest ATV, as was explained in the previous message. THERE IS A SMALL HAND-HELD ALL IN ONE ATV RADIO mfged by Kenwood I believe, you may want to check it out.

      Now if I remember everything from my studies (I am a fast code extra if you couldn't tell by my call) this is all reasonably accurate. Again, contact someone else for the fine lines.

      Hope I can help!

      Nick k9nl
      k9nl@arrl.net

    4. Re:HAM by SlashMaster · · Score: 1

      You're right about the ATV, Nick. Kenwood offers a readymade total solution for what he is describing with the THD-7AG Handheld and the VC-1 accompanying Camera or equivalent.

      I was at one of Kenwood's seminars at the Dayton, OH Hamfest 2 years ago. Kenwood described at that seminar how a person could automatically send pictures from this unit to a website(Basically what this inquiring person is asking about). The legalities are okay since it would be a ham sending it and the communications would be one way(It would be illegal for non-hams to send send anything back to this unit via the web without directly involving a ham...he would need to get a Ham-Radio license if he doesn't have one now is all).

      Kenwood's URL for this unit is:
      http://www.kenwood.net/products/index.cfm?AMA=op en &ama_hheld=open&radio=TH-D7AG&selection=Amateur&ID =80

      The URL for the Accompanying Kenwood VC-1 is: http://www.kenwood.net/products/index.cfm?AMA=open &ama_hheld=open&radio=VC-H1&selection=Amateur&ID=5 1

  18. Cassiopei E-105 by ehiris · · Score: 2

    The Cassio PocketPC comes with a optional flash camera.
    A small GSM cell phone with IR modem (like Nokia 8260) could do the communication and happy coding because I'm not aware of any software that can do the whole thing you are looking for without user input.
    MS Embedded tools (Visual Basic and Visual C) can be downloaded for free from Microsoft.

    P.S.: When you're done coding send me the program :)

  19. Axis 2100 Network Camera by cruelshoes · · Score: 1

    ThinkGeek Has a Web Cam with a built in server, meaning you would just need the modem. May need some hacking to make it road worthy but it could be a nice way to simplify things.

    1. Re:Axis 2100 Network Camera by Casca · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the 5 miles of power cord for the camera.

      --
      Casca
    2. Re:Axis 2100 Network Camera by VultureMN · · Score: 1

      read the article. The bike race is a winding course across the entire state. The five miles is the approximate distance between the rider and his support van.

  20. You could use fake photos.. by Karpe · · Score: 3

    Why not? put some bikes on the track, take some pictures previously (storing localy), and then, during the event, say that they are live! Don't forget to use small, blury images or else it won't work so nice. It is also wise to say that you use a patented technoloy when asked, to justify the fact that you can't explain the technical aspects :)

    1. Re:You could use fake photos.. by Snowdog · · Score: 1


      This could actually get quite entertaining, since for credibility's sake you'd have to add in a script that selects the right pictures to post based on the time of day and the current weather conditions grabbed from NWS.

      Then if you really wanted to be anal about it you could pre-program in your route and dynamically query information from MapQuest to decide what kind of terrain the photo should contain for that particular day and time. And if you wanted to get really ambitious, you could periodically do a lookup on addresses in the vicinity and try to include people and buildings in the photos that might fit for those address (i.e. residential, retail, industrial, agricultural, etc).

      Given all of the above, I'd have to say that a site with fake photos may well be much more interesting than a site with real photos.

    2. Re:You could use fake photos.. by sharkey · · Score: 2

      You don't have to make them too blurry, though. One cornfield looks much the same as another, at least to me, and what else is there in Iowa?

      Make sure you claim to have patented the tech you use, and charge a large fee to get the details.

      --

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  21. Contact the DM register for sponsorship by tcd004 · · Score: 2
    Try contacting the DM register as a sponsor for your cam. They always send out a small army of photographers to cover the event, and I'm sure they'd love to get some exposure through your website, (or put your updates on thier own website, if you're willing)

    As a former Register employee, and knowing the way they're crazy about drumming up RAGBRAI press, I'm sure you might get some interest.

    tcd004
    The Pentium 4 Revealed!
    Don't click here unless you need Stock photos

    1. Re:Contact the DM register for sponsorship by vitus979 · · Score: 1

      this shouldn't be a problem since I work for the Register. :)

  22. Re:Why real-time? by napalm381 · · Score: 1

    Heh. I've ridden the full thing 4 times, and ridden part of the route another 4 years.

  23. I am going to get flamed to death for this one... by Dman33 · · Score: 2

    Okay, granted the iPAQ is a CE device...BUT:
    Compaq iPaq H3600 with PC Card Pack and the Sierra Wireless AirCard 300. This solution offers you everything you need except the camera.
    Now, the iPAQ has a communications port with serial and USB connectivity. I do not know if this would work with a camera but it may...

  24. ALL YOUR BASE STATION ARE BELONG TO US! by Seraph · · Score: 1

    Didn't you miss the obvious one?

  25. Leave the computing to the support team maybe? by Aggrazel · · Score: 2

    Well, I'm thinking, everyone that I see so far has wanted to put a small computer on your bike.

    But I think it would be more efficient, since like you say, to have just a small wireless camera and leave the PC equipment and the web page uploading and whatnot on your support vehicle.

    A quick web search on wireless cameras turned up this:

    http://www.x10.com/products/x10_vk45a.htm

    I don't know if this works (its 2.4ghz, I don't know what your problem is with bluelan), but I'm sure that there are similar products out there.

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:Leave the computing to the support team maybe? by Aggrazel · · Score: 1

      Of course, I realize you said without a base station, what I meant to ask was, what is the problem with having a base station, I know having a self contained system would be neat... but it seems inefficient...

  26. My recommendation--requires about $1500 by Xeger · · Score: 2

    You've got three resources you need to be carrying with you on the bike: network connectivity, processing (CPU) power and electrical power.

    The network connectivity is the easiest: get a cellular phone with CDPD (Cellular Digital Packet Data) or GSM data service. Most cell phones come equipped with an IR port or a serial port attachment so you can connect the phone to an IrDA or serial-capable device and use it as a wireless modem. GSM phones are probably your best bet, since they're most standardized. Check with different cellular service providers to see if any of them cover the entire state of Iowa. I know AT&T does, but they use TDMA which isn't as good as GSM.

    Next, you'll need a computer, with webcam, to hook this phone to. Your options here are: buy an iPAQ handheld for $500 (if you can get your hands on one!), or buy a Sony Vaio mini-notebook for $2500 (weighs less than a pound, about the size of a portable CD player)

    If you can get hold of an iPAQ, it should suffice nicely. Your challenge will then be to connect a webcam to the iPAQ. The iPAQ has a USB port, so any USB webcam will do; the problem will be finding Windows CE drivers for the webcam. You can install an experimental version of Linux on your iPAQ, courtesy of the Compaq research team. Under Linux it should be a snap to use one of the Linux video APIs to capture frames from the webcam. Your cell phone's data link will also work under Linux, via the iPAQ's IrDA port. To find out how to install Linux on an iPAQ, check out the howto: ftp://ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/compaq/ipaq/stab le/install.html. The advantages of an iPAQ are that it's small, very light, and has a comparatively long battery life. If you shut the display off, a single battery charge should last you 24 hours.

    The Sony Vaio is an x86 machine AND it has a camera built into the case, so it's a no-brainer to get a webcam working with it, out of the box. The problems with it are its price and its battery life: even with the display off, the battery isn't going to last longer than six hours. If you buy a VAIO, you'll either need to carry along some spare batteries, rig some sort of generator for it, or stop frequently for recharges.

    A final note: a continuous cellular data connection can be pretty durned expensive. Expect $0.15 per minute of use; even if you only connect when you're using the service, you'll be spending at least $5 / day on webcam updates.

    1. Re:My recommendation--requires about $1500 by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Suspend would help if using the Sony. If you get the Crusoe version, and judicious use of suspend, it could probably go for 12 hours, in which case you would likely be stopping for the night. I think a better solution would be like a security camera that transmits over radio though.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    2. Re:My recommendation--requires about $1500 by kristoe · · Score: 1

      As the original poster said, very poor digital coverage in Iowa. Further, I'd bet there's darn near zero GSM coverage in Iowa.

  27. Watch out for analog modems by smurd · · Score: 1
    I did something similar in another life. We needed to digitize 4 still images and send it through an analog cell phone. Make sure you turn off the error correction internal to the modem, then write your own packet driver that accepts packets in any order and acks each one. You are going to get "stored fragment 'o packet" from the cell, so make sure you ignore incomplete packets.

    It's a mess and its slow (1200 to 2400 baud was the best we got)

    You can also try using amateur radio packet, If this option is available, use it! You probably won't get great coverage but it least you get to stay digital and don't have to worry about modem compression and correction.

    Good luck

  28. Use a dynamo by Stavr0 · · Score: 2

    Use a wheel dynamo, and a smallish solar panel while you're at it. It would alleviate the problem of carrying spare or high capacity batteries. Just one set being continually replenished should work just fine. Put the solar panels on your cycling cap!
    ---

  29. Re:I am going to get flamed to death for this one. by suwain_2 · · Score: 1
    Whaddaya mean it's a CE device?

    Check out Handhelds.org!

    BTW, the iPaq is quite nice... Never actually owned one, but I've played with them quite a bit. (If you need anyone to test one for you, let me know... :-D )
    ________________________________________________

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
  30. The Solution Already Exists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    All you'd need to do is get your Amateur Radio License. It's much easier than you might think.

    Then, look at this device from Kenwood. It's a neat little package that includes a camera, the display, and all the computing you need.

    Hook this baby up to your radio, have a similar setup on the other end, hook it up to a computer on the net and you're all set!

    This is called Slow Scan Television (SSTV).

    Another cool thing about this setup.. throw in a cheap GPS reciever and you're ready to do APRS! (report your position, send messages, and lots of other fun stuff)

    Good luck

  31. Direct Camera -- Web by K-Man · · Score: 2

    Lots of digital camera manufacturers are adding modem interfaces and TCP/IP support to their cameras. Try Polaroid or Ricoh, or go to Google and search for "digital modem camera".

    --
    ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
  32. how about sstv? by AX.25 · · Score: 1

    Something like this would be cool.

    --
    What is pirate software? Software for inventory of stolen treasure?
    1. Re:how about sstv? by AX.25 · · Score: 1

      Well they got a crappy web site. So never mind, if a company can't make it easy to show off one of their products then tough noogies to them. Crappy cold fusion site.

      --
      What is pirate software? Software for inventory of stolen treasure?
    2. Re:how about sstv? by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I wouldn't base my purchase on the quality of their site, but it *really* irritates me when I have to go in circles to find what I want.
      ________________________________________________

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    3. Re:how about sstv? by kylepike · · Score: 1
      better link: Here

      Or, if you are timid,
      http://www.kenwood.net/products/index.cfm? AMA=open &ama_hheld=open&radio=VC-H1&selection=Amateur&ID=5 1

  33. Ricochet baby by werd+life · · Score: 1

    You know what I'm talkin' 'bout.

  34. Potential solution by The+Bastard · · Score: 1

    Most of the wireless solutions available for Palm/Handspring/etc devices utilize CDPD (cellular packet data protocol) for network connectivity. Problem is, Iowa (save for pockets of englightment) doesn't really have much CDPD coverage.

    The serial line to analog cell phone might work (unless you are along a major Interstate in eastern Iowa, or in a major metro area, forget digital coverage). A link for something along this line can be found here.

    Good luck.
    ---------------------------------
    Only in America will someone order a
    Big Mac, large fries, and a Diet Coke.

  35. Your solution is here!!! by NewWazoo · · Score: 4

    I'm working on something vaguely similar to this as part of my Embedded Linux Challenge entry...

    Using a PC-104 device, supplied by ELJ, I'm making use of two radio transceivers... They have a data rate of 56k (though I believe you can purchace higher-data-rate modules) and range of, get this, 40 km, line-of-sight. We're currently doing testing to ascertain the range without line-of-sight in various situations (city, suburbs, woods, etc) so I can't comment on how well they do, though 5 miles should be plenty close to maintain the full data rate...

    They can connect using a "developers'" board that contains an RS-232 chip, and some status LEDs... quite cool, all told. They run on 5-12 VDC, so batteries are certainly an option.

    They're made by World Wireless Communications. IIRC, they cost us something like $400/piece. Look into 'em.

    TheNewWazoo

  36. Interesting challenge... by vizshun67 · · Score: 4

    First, perhaps instead of making use of the batteries exclusively, you could hook a generator to the bike. The generator could be used to charge the batteries where you have 2 sets and you alternate between charge and use/expend.

    Secondly, I would refer you to all of the embedded linux solutions: check out:

    http://www.linux-embedded.com/

    A lot of manufacturers make PC compatible single board computers (some very small) that will run Linux. The Basic STAMP micro-controllers might not be a bad choice either, they come with a lot of accessories (such as a mini-webserver) and a lot of hobbyist work with them: check out:

    http://www.parallaxinc.com/

    Lastly, I would refer you to Information Unlimited at:

    http://www.amazing1.com

    to get a small, low cost CCD camera, assuming that you didn't want to go with one of the cheapy webcams out there.

    As you might be able to surmise, I have given thought to the kind of project you describe (hobbyist robotics actually). I don't really have THE answer for you, but these are some good places to look. I hope this helps.

    1. Re:Interesting challenge... by K45 · · Score: 1

      Umm.. this guy is worried about the aerodynamics of a quickcam. I don't think he wants the extra drag of a generator. Remember that power has to come from somewhere (thermodynamics, yadda yadda), and in this case more power coming from batteries is better.

      K45

      --
      This signature has eleven vowels.
    2. Re:Interesting challenge... by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

      A few small solar cells would make the batteries necessary only during twilight and evening. And I think most bike races have limits to the time you can actually ride, so twilight/evening may not even be an issue.

      I reckon just 6 or 8 small cells affixed to the bike in strategic locations could power a small PDA and camera -- cell phones typically have great batteries.

      disclaimer: I don't know.

      naik

  37. the connectivity part is very easy. by daniell · · Score: 5
    its surprising how easy the connectivity part is: A samsung sprint pcs modem has a serial port and is a modem; just put a modem where you want to connect to (or use a more costly ISP) and dial up. Then transfer the file and disconnect. The samsung 8500 has a special serial cable just for hooking directly up to a palm V. no costly PDA modem needed. This is also largly true of GSM modems (the omnipoint ones here, like that nokia dual band thing).

    I was told once, and I now think it a lie, that GSM worked by communicating to low orbit satellites and hence was global. I don't know if that's true, but I'd hope that either sprint pcs, or GSM would be widely available over the entirety of your course.

    Don't ask about the camera, I wouldn't really suggest that sony picture book. But the cam for the clie is no longer an option it seems; and things like this never seem to be real. Although the visor eye module may be what you'd want in that case.

    1. Re:the connectivity part is very easy. by daniell · · Score: 2

      DOH! when I said nokia, I meant ericsson. s/nokia/ericsson/ specifically the T28 world, or that new palm os one, the 383 world? On another note, having grown up outside the US, I figured that GSM would take over the world considering it was worldwide, but I was quite disappointed to find out that the US millitary was hidering America's integration into thinking globally. Only more recently has there been a concept of the Dual GSM phone which allows communication both inside the restricted wavelengths of the US, and with the standard in the rest of the world.

    2. Re:the connectivity part is very easy. by lizrd · · Score: 2

      I'm quite confident that Sprint PCS or a GSM from Iowa Wireless are not going to be appropriate solutions for covering all of Iowa. The "race" in question here goes winding all over rural Iowa and pretty much tends to avoid the interstate system where the national carriers like Sprint provide service. The only carrier I'm aware of that even comes close to providing digital coverage to all of Iowa is TDMA service from US Cellular. I have a phone from them and they really do a good job of providing digital service to even the most rural areas in the state (except for my apartment, grrrr). I don't think that they offer CDPD service, although I haven't really checked into it since I don't have a laptop.
      _____________

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
    3. Re:the connectivity part is very easy. by daniell · · Score: 2
      You're right about the coverage:
      voicestream omnipoint provides digital in a number of cities, and sprint pcs [if the link doesn't work click on learn, coverage, select iowa] don't exactly offer great coverage. However that samsung phone I mentioned does work in analog mode, and I assumed it could still operate as a modem in that mode, although I may be wrong there. The author said that analog was widely available and probably his best bet.

      I'm surprised and the US Cellular claims of PCS coverage in comparison to the Sprint PCS claims. I wonder why companies wouldn't mutally negotiate terms for sharing PCS access. Unless PCS is some general term and TDMA and CDMA in no way like one-another.

      -Daniel

      ps, personally I don't think there's going to be a good solution, and he should abandon the "live" idea and just get a good camera with lots of storage, mount it, take slides, and upload them progressivly at the end of each day using a phone modem.

    4. Re:the connectivity part is very easy. by mwalker · · Score: 2

      Camera? That's easy too:

      here ya go

      The system integration and telemetry is what's going to suck.

      I reccomend an electric glider as a platform. It can stay up all day, they're easy to fly (hell, i can do it), there's an existing technology base, and all you have to do is drive along the bike race path and fly the plane overhead, even without telemetry. The model airplane distance record was set in just such a fashion.

      And never underestimate the piper cub offense

      good luck.

    5. Re:the connectivity part is very easy. by lizrd · · Score: 2
      I'm surprised and the US Cellular claims of PCS coverage in comparison to the Sprint PCS claims. I wonder why companies wouldn't mutally negotiate terms for sharing PCS access. Unless PCS is some general term and TDMA and CDMA in no way like one-another.

      PCS is actually a general term for any sort of digital cell phone service. The difference between CDMA and TDMA is actually pretty similar to the difference between Ethernet and Token ring. They both get the same job done but they can't talk to each other directly. There's a good description of the differences at this page. The various phone companies are actually pretty good about sharing their customers as they go roaming about. When I travel to Chicago or Minneapolis there isn't any service from US Cellular, but AT&T picks up my phone transparently to me and it still rings if someone calls. But Sprint is never going to pick up my calls for me because they can't talk to my TDMA phone.
      _____________

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
    6. Re:the connectivity part is very easy. by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      Unless PCS is some general term and TDMA and CDMA in no way like one-another.

      Correct. TDMA and CDMA are two incompatible systems for multiplexing radio channels, i.e. making them share radio bandwidth. (Multiplexing allows a band to carry more channels by reducing the bandwidth wasted in guard bands, and it can make the channels less susceptible to narrow-band interference (though TDMA doesn't help as much as CDMA).) There is a phone available in Japan that can operate on both GSM (TDMA-based) and CDPD (CDMA-based), but it's rather expensive and has to be assigned different numbers for the two systems. PCS is a set of services defined by the US FCC that can be implemented by various different mobile phone systems using bands aroudn 1900 MHz: GSM, CDMA IS-95 (aka CDMAone), and TDMA IS-136.

    7. Re:the connectivity part is very easy. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      enemy (this category, I hope, excludes Mexico and Canada)

      Sorry - keep your hopes up for Mexico.

  38. He's obviously never heard of a Lipstick camera. by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

    Try this one for size. With a resolution of 330 TV lines and a 9- to 12-volt line drawing 150 milliamps, this one sounds pretty good. Of course, it'll need some sort of battery pack and transmitter. It isn't the one-piece setup he was looking for, but this will do just fine.

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
  39. Power on a car by u4eahh · · Score: 1

    A car actually has a battery and uses the alternator to recharge that battery. The alternator is connected to the battery, and has a belt running to a fly wheel on the side of the engine. the alternator generates electricty which is passed to the battery, therby recharging it, just FYI for you =)

    --


    and to those who wonder why I simply say...
  40. Kenwood VC-1 may be an option by n8ur · · Score: 2
    Kenwood makes a webcam-like device called the "Visual Communicator 1" (VC-1) that converts the picture to audio tones which can be sent via a two-way voice radio (like a business band radio). It was really designed for ham radio use, but there's no reason you couldn't use it on a business system if the other users would put up with hearing the warbling audio tone for thirty seconds or so each time a picture was transmitted. The pictures can be decoded and saved as .jpg or whatever using software that runs on a laptop hooked to a radio receiver.

    It's quite small -- it looks like an overgrown hand-held radio microphone and the picture quality is "decent" but not spectacular. It costs somewhere between $200 and $300.

    Depending on the system used the range could be in several ten's of miles (particularly if there's a "repeater" on the radio system).

    1. Re:Kenwood VC-1 may be an option by pirodude · · Score: 2

      Try here it looks like the best possible solution for you. just set the equipment for sending the pictures to the web in the support van. Good luck!

  41. I would have loved that for cycling.. by smoondog · · Score: 1

    In 1994, I bicycled across most of the US and ended up being just a couple of days ahead of RAGBRAI. I would have loved to have a cam for my trip, it would have been really cool. Now if only I can get a wireless net solution that worked everywhere I went.... -Moondog

  42. Cellular may not be the way to go. by oneiros27 · · Score: 4

    Have you ever thought about using a radio modem to a chase vehicle? When I was working on my school's solar car project in 1995, we had a van loaded with various telemetry equiptment, including a radio modem connection to the car, so that we could get speed, battery consumption, etc.

    I don't know enough about your race, but with a power inverter, a few space car batteries, and someone willing to follow you in a car, this wouldn't be that hard to pull off.

    [If, however, the race route is completely closed off to vehicles, this would be more difficult].

    You might also look into other forms of communication. Check to see if Metricom has access in our area, or someone like them. [I haven't had one of their modems since '97, but the modem at that time had a battery which lasted me a good 3-4 hrs of constant use.]

    With the chase vehicle concept, you might also try looking at X10 gear, but I don't know what their power consumption is.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Cellular may not be the way to go. by FlexAgain · · Score: 1

      You might also look into other forms of communication.

      Or, another (albeit unlikely) option may be to use Amateur Packet Radio, lots of suitable equipment out there (you could even uplink to a satellite with a suitable antenna !) but technically this may be overly complex for you, and you would need an amateur radio licence as well.

      --

      --
      Actually it is rocket science...
    2. Re:Cellular may not be the way to go. by vitus979 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly chase vehicles aren't an option on RAGBRAI, there are 10,000 riders and the route is closed to vehicles. The closest a chase vehicle could ever get would be maybe 10 miles to the rider.

  43. X10 by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

    I originally thought of the X10 camera when I read this post. I bought one a few months ago, and I love it. It's a fantastic little device and it has a pretty decent range (approx 100'). Unfortunately, 100 feet is a far cry from 5 miles to the support vehicle, so there's still the problem of how to upload the images to the base station. Obviously there's no point in using the wireless camera if you have to carry the base station with you too. So while the camera's good, we still need to figure out where to keep the base station in order for this to be useful. Otherwise, I'd suggest to get one of those USB devices and plug it into a handheld with a cell modem.

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
  44. Palm VII and PalmPix by carpoon · · Score: 1

    What about a Palm VII and Palmpix camera? I am sure it wouldn't be difficult to set up a script that will take a picture and dial the modem every couple of minutes. An unlimited cell account for the Palm VII only costs $45. You may have to swap out batteries, but this seems like it would be a light, relatively inexpensive solution, that you could probably convince Staples or somebody to donate the equipment for.

  45. Subnote w/ built-in camera by kylepike · · Score: 1
    I am one of the people interested in seeing these photos.

    I think I remember a similar story from SF's Critical Mass, but IIRC they just uploaded all the pics after it was over.

    There are 2 Sony sub-notebooks with built-in cameras, the Picturebook and the new GT1. The GT1, in particular, seems like it could work if you figured out a good mounting solution. It has a nice cam, 17 hours battery life, full motion video, a type II PCMCIA slot, etc. It's really a camcorder with a PC built in - not the other way around.

    More info, and US purchase, is available here : http://www.dynamism.com/gt1/index.shtml for the timid.

    Also the newest Libretto and another of the japan-market subnotes (a fujitsu I think) have built in cameras. I would have more info, but it seems like Japan Palmtop Direct, www.jpd.com, has gone down/out of business. They used to be the best source for JPN market notebooks.

    Dynamism has the Libretto, and its' built-in "lipstick camera" is removable, which the sonys are not. But it only has a 3.2 GB Hd.

    Dynamism might actually ship you one of these units for free, if you get your colleagues at the Register's tech department to request it...

    There is a visor cam available, and a palm pilot camera, but the problem is there's not an easy way to hook both a camera and a cellular modem up to a PDA. That, to me, is the biggest prob with the Visor and its Springboard slot - you cannot daisy-chain springboard modules. No way to use wireless, camera and flash memory in one system concurrently.

    Now if there is a camera available for the Palm VII, and there is Mobitex service in the area, that might work. (FYI any device that says it'll work with a III should work with a VII)

    Otherwise, you might be stuck trying to build a single-purpose PC, or you might have to upload pics at intervals when you stop.

  46. Non-real time solution by ptomblin · · Score: 2

    Get an ordinary digital camera that takes pictures onto removable media, such as CF or memory sticks. Get a couple of these media. Every once in a while have your support people drive up and hand you one CF/stick while you hand them back the one you've just filled up with pictures. Let them worry about uploading the pictures to the web.

    This solution means that you no longer have size/weight/power restraints on the computer and communications equipment doing the uploading to the net, which should make things cheaper and easier.

    If you've got the budget for it, you might prefer two cameras to swap back and forth rather than trying to fiddle with CF cards while riding at high speed.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  47. Roll your own.... by Hyperkinetic · · Score: 1
    Check out the LART (Linux Advanced Radio Terminal) which is intended for these types of applications. www.lart.tudelft.nl. It's still in the ALPHA stage, but is very powerful and consumes less than 1W!!! The downside is making your own video capture and software to drive it.

    Also look at Ricochet wireless modems. They have 28.8 in many places and 128K bps in major cities.

    Both the LART and Ricochet should only weigh a few pounds.

  48. From the writer by vitus979 · · Score: 2

    I'd first like to thank the slashdot guys for posting this. Here are some of the things I've done since I sent them the original message. Second of all I work for the Register, so if this goes through hopefully I'll be able to ride RAGBRAI and not take vacation time for it. :)


    I actually haven't found a digital camera that'll fit my requirements so I'm looking into an analog camera with an analog-USB adapter.

    I'm looking at the:

    SuperCircuits pc75wr analog camera --> http://www.supercircuits.com/

    and the Belkin analog -> USB converter --> http://www.usbstuff.com/capture.html

    Computer:
    I'll admit it and get flamed here, but I haven't looked through the embedded Linux stuff on the web, but from looking at Palms, Handsprings, IPaqs, and Casio's line I haven't been able to find a handheld that will do both a USB connection and a PCMCIA cellular modem connection at the same time. I think I found my computer base unit. It also includes a built in GPS system so if things go right there might be a map beside the picture with a big star that shows where the rider currently is on the route.

    http://corp.intermec.com/products/6640.htm

    Modem: I recently found out that one of the cell phone companies also helps to sponsor RAGBRAI so I might be able to swing a sponsorship for this portion.

    I talked with a gentleman at MIT in the wearable computer club and the consensus is to be careful and get shock-resistant parts since I'll be on the bike.

    Keep the suggestions coming, the more the better. (I don't want to use up my vacation to go on RAGBRAI!!) :)

    1. Re:From the writer by yipper · · Score: 1

      You might want to check with Iowa Network Services, INS. They handle a lot of internet access in rural Iowa and also telephone traffic. Maybe they would do some sponsorship for your communications link.

    2. Re:From the writer by Poor+Soul · · Score: 1

      Another solution you may consider is the Intermec 6651 terminal (approx $1500 on Mobile Planet.com). It's fairly light-weight (approx 2 lbs), about the right dimentions (8.4" L * 5.5" W), has a built in camera, and also supports PCMCIA Type 2 cards, as well as CompactFlash cards. It runs Windows CE and the thing I like about it over the Compaq I-Paq is that it has a keyboard so you're not stuck screen typing everthing. The battery life is about 8 hours( as long as you turn the backlight off or autodimm it after a few seconds).

      It only has 32 meg of memory which is split between storage and programs, but you could easily add a couple hundred meg CF card or Sandisk for the storage. The camera will do still pictures as well as video w/ sound. I have been able to fit about 2 hours of video on a 175 Type 2 Sandisk card, or about 8533 still pictures. Sandisk makes Type 2 cards up to 880 megs or so, but they are pretty pricey(~$1800). Over at pricewatch, you can pick up a 256 meg Sandisk for about $300 or a 256 meg CompactFlash card for about $355. The battery is removable, so you could get additional batteries (about $129) to swap out along with a couple of Sandisks during your ride and have your support van charge the batteries/upload the video.

      Another great thing is that it has a built in 56k modem so you can dail into any ISP along the way (great for where you won't be able to get cellular coverage) and also a USB port. If you decided you didn't want to use the built in camera you could always opt for an external USB Camera that fit your needs.


      If you want to know more, take the fuzzy rabbit slippers off and mail me.


      In the words of Homer Simpson... "Mmmmm... beer."

      --

      In the words of Homer Simpson... "Mmmmm... beer."
  49. Internet connectivity by Digital+G · · Score: 1

    I would look to paririe inet for the internet connection, i would also look to the sony viao notebook for the pc, if i remeber these have a built in camera on the top of them, so you could just make a bracket to mount it to the front of bike. if nothing else, get a bike rack that goes over your back tire and put a notebook on that and run a cam up front.
    BTW RAGBRI rules, gotta check out the partys at night! now thats what you need the cams for =)

    --

    End Transmission....
    1. Re:Internet connectivity by madfgurtbn · · Score: 1

      Prairieinet only works within 6 miles of the transmitter and only if there is clear line of sight. I believe that you also need a directional antenna on the receiving end(I think their website says the receiving antenna is 2 feet wide or so) Not yet practical for bicycle use and not yet covering the whole state, but perhaps in the near future? P.S. I doubt that you can roam from one cell to another.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  50. Re:Yes, but... by job0 · · Score: 1

    what? like yours?

  51. Re:heh by joshsisk · · Score: 2

    I don't know why I'm responding to an obvious troll, but I think he was actually complaining about the fact that the store bought solutions he saw were 20 lbs and required attaching a trailer to his bike. This seems like an obvious problem since he's going to be on a long distance bike ride.

    Also, price doesn't seem like too much of a problem for the poster, since his request for advice mentions he wants as small of a webcam as possible, as well as a small computer that can connect to a webcam and a pda AND a cellular modem. None of these items are free, or even cheap. It seems the reason he wants to develop his own solution to his problem is that the current solutions are not good enough.

    You decry this person attempting to create their own solution, rather than throwing money away by purchasing a solution that is not up to their needs. Whatever happened to good ol' fashioned ingenuity? The Do It Yourself ethic? What in the world is wrong with him finding a way to do something on his own? Do you also think it's crazy to work on your own car, rather than overpay a mechanic to work on it for you?

    I don't understand your position. What in the world is wrong with figuring something out for yourself and implementing it, as opposed to paying someone to do it for you? What is wrong with him asking for advice on how to solve his problem?

    I think you are just using this topic as an inappropriate excuse to sound off about one of your pet peeves. It is inappropriate since this post has little to do with Open Source. He has a hardware problem and is trying to solve it in the best way he can. His solution seems to involve quite a bit of non-Open Source hardware (pda's, cell phones, webcams). If his question was "I need to hook two of my computers together, how do I do it?" would you tell him how to plug the cables in, or use that as another excuse to vent?

    Josh Sisk

  52. Handspring Visor + Eyemodule2 + Cellphone by rwa2 · · Score: 5
    I'm surprised no one mentioned this yet... The eyemodule 2 plugs right into the visor and can capture 640x480 color. It should come with software that will allow you to dial up to an ISP and email the pictures off. I use comlink and a cell phone with an IRDA modem to connect to the internet (my Visor is more or less my primary computer now, I can use TGssh to log into my friends' computers and do stuff there). So you would need something like the following:
    • Visor Deluxe or Platinum ($250 / $300, 8MB of memory, runs for about 2-6 weeks off a pair of AA batteries) The Prism would let you look at your pictures in color, but has rechargeable batteries, so probably wouldn't work for you. The greyscale Visors seem to be able to store color pictures, though.
    • Eyemodule2 ($200 , you can download the picture emailer program from Palmgear.com or freewarepalm.com there's also the greyscale eyemodule1 for cheaper some places)
    • cell phone with a modem (~$170 for my little Nokia phone with IRDA. There are Visorphones ($300) and wireless modules for the Visor, but then you'd have to swap modules all the time. For service, I have Voicestream GSM, but that's limited to 9600baud digital service right now... I think TDMA (AT&T, Verizon) networks might let you connect up to 14400baud and have more complete analog roaming).
    • if you want to get fancy, you could spend maybe $100 or so on phone-Visor serial cables so you don't have to hold them together to use the lame IRDA link, so you can keep pedalling while you're connected. Then again, it might be cheaper and more convenient to just duct tape both of them to your handlebars so the IRDA links always work... that way you could use the phone's serial port for a handsfree kit so you can talk to people when you aren't dialed in. A pet peeve of mine with the Nokia phone is that the IRDA port is on the wrong side of the phone, so I have to hold it upside down to use my Visor. But you could probably get creative with a mirror.)
    • you might want to program a script (or get someone else to program a script :) ) to automate the picture grabbing/uploading tasks with one button. I don't think I've seen anything like that yet...
    Good luck! Sounds like you're going to have a lot of fun!
  53. Tiny,free, webcam by mbowles · · Score: 1

    Get with a local amateur radio club, especially one with members interested in ATV. They love to play with systems like this and would probably have a better solution than the PDA/cell phone idea.

    1. Re:Tiny,free, webcam by slithytove · · Score: 1

      indeed

      a friend of mine put a camera into a radio controlled plane which broadcast on uhf, so u can pick it up on a tv. Also look at 12v bike generators.

  54. Get yerself a PDA by radialphish · · Score: 1

    Quite simple:

    Get a Casio Cassipeia with the CompactFlash camera extension, and use the Brighthand article found here or here to get your wireless connectivity.

    Get any of the freeware FTP programs (some have timed upload of a specific directory), set the camera for captures every few seconds, and you have yourself a completly isolated webcam the size of (roughly) a PDA.

    An alternative which involves a base station would be a video camera with a high range transmitter (a few miles). This could take the signal to a much powerful connection, where you could, say, stream the video...

  55. Actually pants cam isn't live by Darkfred · · Score: 1

    I believe the pants cam was originally meant to be live, but it never turned out that way, for now it is just looping through 2400 saved jpgs that were made during the first run of the camera.

    You can read more about it at http://diddl.firehead.org/pantscam/ This is a sort of informal faq, (not by the same person wearing the pants)

    --
    ----- 70% of all statistics are completely made up.
  56. Think Geek. by Rev.+DeFiLEZ · · Score: 1
    there is a standalone network cam on think geek that runs its own webserver, and it supports ppp and ethernet. so buy one and get a cell phone with the data-cable to rj11 adaptor and ppl can connect directly to the cam. http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/things/36a0.html

    --
    rev.
    ok next.

    messy but quick post. sorry

  57. You have to start by looking at the Cam's POV. by CodeShark · · Score: 5
    This is a classic case of knowing which problem to solve first, then building a system that doesn't break the solution (to the first problem). What I am getting at is that if you don't consider the camera POV, you might end up with a wonderful system to collect and transmit ultimately worthless pictures in terms of quality. It also almost goes without saying that all of the electronic equipment needs to be suitably protected from bad weather and road dust/muck, etc.

    So here's my specs for a cam setup that could get reasonably interesting pictures:

    1. Vibrational stability. No use getting jittery, blurred pix, right?
    2. Aimability. What if the most interesting pic of the moment isn't directly ahead? This might include lens with a moderate amount of wide angle/zoom capability. This could probably be accomplished with a semi-custom tripod head fitting.
    3. To go with aimability, etc. I would add detachability -- in case the bicyle it is mounted on were damaged, the setup could be moved. Secondarily there are many more interesting pix to be had when the riders aren't actually in motion, and finally
    4. Reasonably high resolution and color depth, because even if you are transmitting images live, how many people can watch the whole seven day race? So back at the web server end, and after the race is finished, you want to have better than average pix as a result of all the effort.
    All of this says that what you probably want on the handlebars is a fairly decent megapixel camera, probably the one that uses an IBM microdrive -- one I have heard of can store 1500 pictures. (Which would be about one a minute for 12 hours), assuming that the cam uses AA batteries, so that a recharger can takes care of the continued power requirements. Nearly all the good digital cams have USB, so you have an easy connection to the device which will be responsible for image collection and transmission.

    Then we have to consider the other end: transmitting the image without a high speed data link. Since high res, high color pix require major bandwidth, the collector has to be able to compress the incoming images, probably resized for web page formatting, and perhaps tagged so that the high res pix from the camera can later be uploaded and replace the lower res image or be available from a thumbnail.

    Probably requires more than a PDA. So my vote goes to the smallest Transmeta-powered device capable of the image processing, equipped with a wireless PC-MIA modem of some type. (Clueless about the best communication option here, fellow /.'ers, help me out!) Finally, I would think that a person would need a small solar panel to keep all of the devices and batteries charged, so the Transmeta device would rest just under the solar panel probably on a cushioned rack above the back wheel.

    Still weighs alot less than 20 lbs, I would think, and positioned properly shouldn't add that much drag. Best I can do but fellow readers, what do you think?

    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
    1. Re:You have to start by looking at the Cam's POV. by CvD · · Score: 1

      Never mind the solar power.... when you're in motion, you can use that energy. Get a littly bike light dynamo for your power source. It should be enough to power a PDA, I don't know about the power requirements for the larger computer mentioned. A huge solar panel would be less convenient, I think.

  58. Re:They have computers in Iowa!!! by jgartin · · Score: 1

    Gateway is based in Sioux City. Iowa was one of the first states with a widespread video conferencing network. It's usually used in the education system. Iowa is more computerized than you'd think.

  59. Axis Web Cam? by SEWilco · · Score: 2
    Wrong Link. You mean Axis.Com.

    The 2120 looks like it's almost what you need. It can talk to a modem for incoming or outgoing calls, it can take a picture based on either time or alarm (push a button to take a picture).

    But its power is 12VAC, 9.6A. You'll have to tinker to give it AC.

  60. Dolphin PenCam by 3Suns · · Score: 2

    I own a Dolphin Pencam FastUSB007, whick is approximately as long as a ballpoint pen and about as wide as 2 AA batteries side-by-side. It is USB (you might have to duct-tape the USB plug into the side to keep it attached on a bicycle). The cool thing about it is it functions both as a digital camera (when disattached) and as a webcam (when attached to a computer). It takes 2 AAA batteries and is extremely light (it wouldn't be hard to mount on a bike).

    AFAIK, the software only works in Windows, and I had a bit of trouble getting it working. You can use whatever free Webcam software you want (I use ConquerCam I found somewhere - it uploads to a FTP site every 5 seconds or so). The image quality isn't that great - The resolution is very small, in camera mode it needs a substantial amount f light to take the picture, and the videos are rather grainy.

    You should be able to find it for around $80. The site I bought it from no longer sells it, but I'm sure it's available elsewhere.

    --

    -3Suns

    ~~~~
    The Revolution will be Slashdotted
  61. What I've used, and some advice. by mahlen · · Score: 4

    My wireless Web setup is:

    This stuff allows me to browse the web wirelessly. I'm not actually sure how you'd upload starting with this setup; I suspect that's a software problem, and I'm hoping it's solved elsewhere in this thread.

    That said, I'll throw out some other notes on systems like this. First, they are flaky, and don't like you moving, so when you get a connection, stop moving. A modem connection seems to be much more fragile when switching between network cells than a phone call is. Second, think redundant. Get multiple paths of connection, because there are so many places where the connection can break down, and you'll go crazy if you absolutely depend on any of them. Lastly, forget about sending up pictures and enjoy the ride. Experiences like that aren't for sharing with other people over the web, they are for experiencing first hand, while it's going on. The 3rd California AIDS Ride from San Francisco to Los Angeles changed my life, but it wouldn't have if I'd been fretting over hardware the whole time.

    mahlen

    See how today's achievement is only tomorrow's confusion; see how possession always cheapens the thing that was precious. --William Dean Howells (1837-1920)

  62. Hey! How about.. by tb3 · · Score: 1

    a Gameboy, with one of those little B/W cameras they used to sell for the thing. I bet you could pick up one of those real cheap. Then use the Gameboy network port to hook into a mobile phone and you're set!
    -----------------

    --

    www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  63. Ask Wordy; Wordy knows by knutsen · · Score: 1

    Steve Roberts, the ultimate technomad, would be the ideal person to ask about this sort of thing. Email wordy@microship.com or surf to http://www.microship.com

  64. Do some reasearch by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    I live in Iowa (yeah, computers *do* exist here. Gateway once was based in Iowa, in fact. +1 Informational :P) and think you should actually look into a few things before doing this webcam off a bike during RAGBRAI.

    LAN parties are a new thing around here. People are realizing they can connect their computers up in a "little Internet" and play games and share farm porn.

    Webcams are currently illegal according to city ordinances in 35 of the 99 counties, so you'll want to turn the puppy off depending on where you're at during particular points of the day.

    I went ahead and asked my cousin Darrell what was wrong, but he didn't reply, so I asked my other cousin Darrell whose *the* computer tech up at State University. His response?

    "Handheld PDAs r a black market item in Iowa. Y'see, some genius farmboy figured out how to hook the sonsabeetches up to dat der Internet thingny and using some GPSr they can finger out how well their corn be a growing and witcha dem plots a'land needa watering."

    Sad thing is, he's right. The college I'm attending is pumping out some decent quality MIS and ComSci/ComE students that end up leaving the state to work places where states welcome business, rather than tax the hell out of them.

    So yeah, we might not be a Silicon Valley, but you just wait till the farmers start using some of the agriculutural technology Iowa State University has been working on.

    Who needs to genetically modify food when you can grow more in a smaller space due to simple improvements in the layout using the technology you've got?

    1. Re:Do some reasearch by ksheff · · Score: 2

      Gateway once was based in Iowa

      Since when? I thought it's always been in N Sioux City, South Dakota. I mean, why live or base a business that could be anywhere in Sioux City, when you can go a few miles north and not have to pay state income tax & lower property tax? When I was in college, I know that some of Gateway's machines were made in Rapid City, SD because for an EE class, we toured a custom electronics assembly plant in town. We watched them make Gateways and some other stuff.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:Do some reasearch by ksheff · · Score: 2

      I went to their site to see if they had any company history online. It only says that it was started in 1985 and by two guys in an Iowa farm house. I do know that by 87 or 88, they were in N Sioux City, because one of my classmates in college worked there during the summers. I can't remember when they moved the headquarters to San Diego. I believe it was to be closer to Silicon Valley and Waite liked the climate better (wimp!).

      I can believe the state not giving them a tax break. My roommate from college lives in IA City now and when it comes to taxes, hates the IA state income tax.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  65. just because you cant imagine it ... by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Other people might find a use.
    You sound like the IBM guy in the 1950s who
    could figure out why the world would ever
    need more than seven computers.

  66. signals and resetting by mach-5 · · Score: 1

    This might be kind of a "Duh" post, but be sure that the software has the ability to redial or retry the call, if it cannot find a signal. You do not want to be resetting every 5 minutes because you are in a rural area with no coverage. Even areas that claim 100% coverage can have some nasty spots. Just make sure that the software can handle a fully automatic process, without having any human intervention. Test it out by driving around in your car, but when you do the test just turn it on, and let it run, don't touch a thing. Have a friend monitor the website to make sure it is working.

  67. Talk to the hams by brassrat77 · · Score: 4

    "Ham" (amateur) radio groups provide communications support for the ride. This may include ATV (amateur television) and definietly includes APRS (amatuer position reporting system). ATV can send live NTSC-quality video and audio at least from near cities on the route. APRS has an add-on protocol for sending still images and supports links to internet feeds. The hams have already figured out solutions to power, equipment, safety, and operating procedures.

    Another approach might be to use a CPDP modem with a laptop. I do not think there is an easy way to do it with a Palm or Visor, although there is a simple httpd server for the palm that works fine with the omnisky modem. Coverage outside of cities may be a problem.

    1. Re:Talk to the hams by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1
      A possibility here: Might it not be allowed for a licensed ham radio operator to switch on the transmitter connected to your bike? If the FCC licensing requirements were to allow this, you would then be connected to free packet radio without the pain of getting a ham license.

      Marlin

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    2. Re:Talk to the hams by REden · · Score: 1

      Finally this got mentioned.

      It's a sign of the state of Ham Radio that this got mentioned so far into the thread.

      Unfortunately, I'm part of the problem not the solution. I haven't had a working rig in 6 years.

      Maybe in a few years once my kids are above toddler stage I'll have more time to become active. I'll try to even get them licensed!

      Robert - N5GWY

      --
      --- If it's worth doing, it's worth doing in Perl!
  68. Re:They have computers in Iowa!!! by madfgurtbn · · Score: 2

    Yes, the digital computer was invented in Iowa. See: http://www.cs.iastate.edu/jva/jva-archive.shtml

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money. Dad, get me out of this.
  69. visor by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I beleive a visor hand held devise, along with the appropriet handspring modules will suffice.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  70. PDA cams by actappan · · Score: 1

    So, this might require a prett deep hack - but there are cams availibe for PDA's. Throw one together with cam, a wireless modem (PCS phone or PQA PDA maybe . . .) throw a generator on the bike week and you've got a pretty small package. The uploads might have to go through some sort of server side conversion for display - but the remote could be pretty small.

    --
    \Drew National Data Director, John Edwards for President
  71. Cheapest digital system I can think of... by novum_periculum · · Score: 1

    OK, here it goes...I'll see if I can remember all of it... Cheapest CPU platform - Handspring Visor (www.handspring.com) SpringBoard EyeModule2 expansion digital camera - (http://www.handspring.com/products/sbmodules/eyem odule2details.jhtml) SierraWireless Dart300 battery operated Serial CDPD modem - (www.sierrawireless.com) By using a serial based CDPD modem, you can free up the expansion slot for the camera. The camera software has the ability to snap images/video and sync them to your desktop. The HotSync software has the ability to network sync over the CDPD modem. Just dump out the JPEG images to your server. Some assembly required. A slightly cheaper communucations alternative is to use a Motorola iDEN CDMA phone with a data cable. You can then establish a PPP connection to the Handspring through the serial cable. NexTel is the American carrier that I know of. ClearNet here in Canada. Not too sure about the NexTel system, but here in Canada I can get wireless packet services on my iDEN for free with just a little bit of programming knowledge relating to the handset. No airtime charged for being online, and the best thing is that it is totally legit :) ICQ me at 34034928 if you have any questions.

  72. Amateur Radio solution by ThePez · · Score: 1
    As other have mentioned, there is an amateur radio solution but it would require you to have a license to operate. Sounds like you've got something figured out but for those curious to know what the "radio hacker" approach is, you can go here. There is also the problem of radio versus cellular coverage. Although, I'm pretty sure hams already support the logistics-side of RAGBRAI and will bring their own repeaters along.

    I've been considering a similar attempt this summer during the Courage Classic ride in Colorado. The combination of a Kenwood TH-DA7G transciever and VC-H1 camera are hard for a gadget-hound-radio-amateur-cyclist to pass up. Paul, KB0LUR

  73. Just one camera? Streaming video? KWhr's/Kg by GMac · · Score: 1

    Video cameras have become incredibly small over the past few years, not only that but also power usage has dropped dramatically! Here is a "videoBug" that is small and light enough to put on your flag/whip antenna. Super Circuits Video Bug.

    Perhaps you could wire up a few of these with some switches on the handlebars to send them power and feed video input to the digitizer. HeadCam, RackCam, AxilCam, ... It would be cool if you could let someone toggle the camera input remotely!

    If you have the budget and want to do high speed relay links via a support vehicle, then have a look at:

    Radio Based Communications

    At the high end are 115k spread spectrum RF modems from FreeWave. Upto 20 mile range, I believe they were used on an Everest expedition. One of them has adjustable range so you can operate it legally in restricted areas without a license. They also have repeaters ... Of course the more range/bandwidth the more current used to transmit, so pick your comms accordingly! Doing streaming video through a cellular modem might yeild very poor frame rates and/or low res, but then again you have to think of your target audience. Do you wan't to serve people with high speed connections as well as people on dialup? With a high speed link you could do both and also perhaps do higher quality one image at a time pages for people on slow links.

    Off the shelf computer notebooks/pads chew up batteries pretty quickly. Of course they also offer off the shelf video encoding solutions. Apple's powerbooks might give you the greatest run time(dual battery) and also with the ability to encode the video, they also have firewire which would let you hook up some lightweight digital video cameras! Hmm, image stablization would be kinda nice too! Apple Power Book. This would put you in the "pannier" solution space though!.

    If you want to get exotic on the power supply then check out some of the recent breakthroughs in gel pack based power supplies, they get at least twice the KWhr/Kg ratio over Lithium-Ion.

  74. Iridium only 2400 baud (?) by kristoe · · Score: 1

    I think I remember reading way back that Iridium only supports up to 2400 baud. The article (pre-Iridium blowup) predicted that as a reason for a then-future demise of Iridium. Funny that.

  75. I'll like your testicle!!!!!! by by+Heidi+Wall · · Score: 1

    as long as that bitch Lover's Arrival doesn't beet me to it
    Clarity does not require the absence of impurities,

    --
    Clarity does not require the absence of impurities,
    only that the impurities contribute to understanding
  76. You should see what people haul on their bikes... by ShaggusMacHaggis · · Score: 1

    I did RAGBRAI last year, and had a blast..you should see what people haul on their bikes....a fully stocked bar, a kitchen sink, a barbaque, inflatable women, sheep, etc. , stereo systems that you can hear from at least a mile away...

  77. Amateur Radio by Gadget+Hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Kenwood's VC-H1 is a hand-held slow-scan TV device. Although it is being sold as amateur radio equipment, you could certainly interface it to a CB or FRS radio instead: http://www.kenwood.net/ama_categories.cfm http://www.kenwood.net/products/index.cfm?AMA=open &ama_hheld=open&radio=VC-H1&selection=Amateur&ID=5 1 On the receiving end, you could probably get away with hooking a matching radio to a PC via the sound card and using a software based modem to decode the incoming images. The VC-H1 speaks a wide variaty of image languages.

    1. Re:Amateur Radio by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 2

      In case you have trouble with that link... go here

  78. Sony Vaio Picturebook by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
    The simplest solution, imho, assuming money is not a problem: Get a Sony Vaio Picturebook (it has a built-in webcam) and a PC-card cell modem. Then download ConquerCam. Voila, problem solved. You can easily mount the Picturebook on the front of your bike (or anywhere, for that matter) with a bit of duct tape, since it only weighs about 2 pounds. What's more, it's got a Transmeta processor, so it has a nice long battery life.

    --

  79. Well, if you use a Libretto, then... by cyberbrian · · Score: 1

    ...you can hang some sort of button at the end of a serial wire - this way you can click off picts at will in addition to the scheduled snapshots.

  80. ricoh by bigbadbuccidaddy · · Score: 1

    ricoh's top of the line digital camera can probably do what you want. You probably need to connect a cell phone for the data connectivity, but you won't need a PC or PDA in the middle. i don't know if the camera is out yet -- but maybe Ricoh would loan you one for the trip.

  81. Why shore... by KingAzzy · · Score: 1

    A satellite phone w/ an IP adapter coupled with a PDA that has USB (like the Jornada) and a lot of spare batteries should cure what ails ya!

    --

    --
    $ chown -R us:us yourbase

  82. Damn cool by ghost1911 · · Score: 1

    I must say..... damn cool. I appologize for being lame but I just thought I'd acknowledge you...

    --
    .: 2+2 = PI SQRT(1+N) :. All together now, what is n?
  83. Linux video wrist watch by ksheff · · Score: 2

    The July 2000 issue of Linux Journal had a story about a prof at the University of Tornoto had created a watch in 1998 running linux that has a video camera. Here's the article: http://www2.linuxjournal.com/lj-issues/issue75/399 3.html.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  84. Easy! by glowingspleen · · Score: 1

    Take a webcam, some duct tape, a heavy chain, and some black electrical tape. Step 1) Duct tape the webcam to the handlebars.
    Step 2) Attach the chain to the front of the bike
    Step 3) Attach the other end to a truck
    Step 4) Wrap the chain with the electrical tape
    Step 5) Tell everyone that the chain is actually a network cable
    Step 6) Beat the guy in 2nd place by 3.4 hours.
    Step 7) Celebrate, blaming MicroSoft for the webcam not working.

  85. check out www.helmetcamera.com by desktopcoke · · Score: 1

    for the camera only. As for transferring the data and such, you'll have to look elsewhere.

  86. Re:Not to be rude by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

    I do.

    --
    blog
  87. The Vtech Phusion. by DivideByZero · · Score: 1
    ...and things like this never seem to be real.

    You're kidding, right? The Phusion was out before Christmas. I recently saw them on clearance sale at a local megabox store for about $80.

    If you can't find one, it's because you're looking in the wrong place. Try the toy department, not the PDA counter.

    It seems to kind have flopped this christmas, so jump out and get one now if you want it.

    Pictures from Amazon.com and VTech...

  88. Remember to take the weather into account. by Anopheles · · Score: 1

    Two things, the weather, and my critique of your hardware requirements:

    Yeah, this would all be good in a controlled environment, but you ahve to take the weather into consideration. RAGBRAI is in the hottest part of the summer. In Iowa, that means 80% humidity and temperatures reaching over 100 degrees on the pavement. Truly miserable weather, especially when carrying heavy equipment. (and 10 lbs can be quite a load when biking for 500 miles)

    So, you have to take heat into account. Most electronic equipment generate a lot of heat, and the humidity doesn't help either.

    And speaking of humidity, we need to consider the freak weather. When it's hot and humid, thunderstorms develop very quickly, and downpours can hit you in a second. Waterproofing the stuff has to be a top priority. I'd suggest some sort of quick-release harness, and a water-proof zippered bag that hangs off the bike.

    Finally, my 386 can handle high-res image conversion. it might take a minute to download each picture, but this isn't a real-time situation here. A cheap PDA will EASILY be able to handle the situation, regardless of the resolution. And the handspring Visor has both a Camera module *and* a cellular modem option. So, my idea is to make a harness on the front of the bike, and schedule a picture to be taken every 5 minutes or so. When the PDA gets full maybe after 3 hours or so, swap the Springboard modules, and download to the website.

    Camera option #2.
    Use a digital camera that stores pics onto a CompactFlash stick. Since you can get CF sticks that hold 32 or 64 MB, you can store quite a few pics between modem updates. Whenever you take a break (every couple of hours), go to your chase vehicle and swap memory sticks with them. They're going to be bored anyway, right?

    And, we're not caring about the RAGBRAI, it's the crazy parties that are held every night after each day's race! That's what I want pictures of!

    1. Re:Remember to take the weather into account. by CodeShark · · Score: 1
      Actually, the weather would be my first concern. No use having a system if it either dies a weather related death, or can't be used because of the weather. So an optically neutral case camera shell like they use underwater would be important, but for cycling, this would have to be made or purchased in a low-drag version. Water-proof, low drag casings for the electronics and computing devices would be required as well. As to Heat and humidity dissipation--those are good questions, don't have the answers myself.

      10 lbs can be quite a load when biking for 500 milesActually, I would hope to optimize this down to maybe 5-6 pounds, but your point is still valid. However, it seems like with a mix of uphill/downhill parts of the ride, that minimizing aerodynamic drag would be a larger concern --> cyclers, what do you think?

      Finally as to the actual electronics, I like the idea of the Handspring, as you described it, but I thought the whole point was semi-real time updating of the race web-site. Secondarily, the reason I would go with a digicam with a microdrive is that it holds 340 MB, presumably enough for a whole day's shooting, without requiring the rider to either stop and swap, or hot-swap the high-res image storage.

      BTW, you can send the crazy party pictures to my website at http://.... *grin*

      --
      ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...
  89. GSM, PCS, etc. by maggard · · Score: 2
    I was told once, and I now think it a lie, that GSM worked by communicating to low orbit satellites and hence was global. I don't know if that's true, but I'd hope that either sprint pcs, or GSM would be widely available over the entirety of your course.
    You're confusing GSM with Iridium, the Motorola-backed lowflying satelite constellation that went bust & is now on US Dept. of Defense life support.

    GSM is simply a set of frequencies & protocols. It's a European standard that's been extremely succesful, there's some of it on the NA coasts in dense areas but not much outside them. It's digital, uses towers like everyone else, nothing particularly exotic except for it being common most everywhere else and often using a small card for transferring the users network identity between phones. The only provider I can think of off-hand was Voicestream (who knows what brand they are this week.)

    PCS is slightly more likely to be availaible but not much. Also primarily availiable in metropolitan areas it's a digital format that does oftentimes have provisions for reasonably fast data transmission (depends on the local service provider.) Generally this simply requires an overpriced serial-to-phone cable or in some cases an infrared link.

    The third option would be of course good ole analog cellphone service. This has the widest distribution, the greatest range, and although it's slower then the other options it'll get through more of the time. Here you really are using a modem and it's just like plugging into a landline, albeit a very poor quality one.

    Since most long-distance races take place away from metropolitan areas and since it's unlikely that a racer can stop to transmit when conditions are best it looks like analog is a must. It has the greatest chance of getting through when the racers are having a break and are free to mess about with this sort of stuff.

    Of course there are many dual and tri mode phones so it's not an either/or proposition (my Motorola 7868W is 2 analog / 1 PCS channel.) If you're really interested in doing this then cut a deal with a provider with good local coverage and ask for a phone, airtime, & tech support in return for putting a link to them on the website.

    Finally many companies have mobile relays for deployment at events like fairs, sports events, etc. where there will be lots of customers but only intermittantly and not worth a permanent relay. You may well be able to get the provider to shadow the race with their mobile realy truck providing service to all of the riders & support folks.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  90. can ALMOST help... by holister · · Score: 1

    I'm currently working on a project that involves video communication using a PDA over amateur radio links (which are limited only to 1500watts), solving the distance and cost problem, however, it will be some time before it is completed...perhaps by july I just may have a working prototype :)

  91. GSM in Iowa. by clyons · · Score: 1
    As the original poster said, very poor digital coverage in Iowa. Further, I'd bet there's darn near zero GSM coverage in Iowa. Actually, GSM is expanding in Iowa. It's in the more populated areas right now. Now much, however, in western Iowa. However, I understand that's going to be changing as Voicestream and Iowa Wireless Services do some major building out this year. Also, anyone know the timeframe of AT&T adding that GSM overlay to their TDMA systems?

    --

    --

    --
    Intelligence is definitely a recessive trait.

  92. Webcam on a bicycle? Bad idea. by wolfpaws · · Score: 1

    Webcam images are bad enough on a stationary platform with constant lighting...

    And you want to put a webcam on a moving, vibrating bicycle? Is there really a web audience for hundreds of blurry, badly contrasted and essentially unrecognizable images?

    Follow the lessons from Critical Mass. Stick with a decent handheld digital camera.

    Oh yeah...Mounting it on the bike is a bad idea. From a photo composition POV as well as from a mechanical one.

  93. Buy one off the shelf by AndyBarrow · · Score: 1
    Kenwood makes a system for their amateur radio transcivers that has been available for a couple of years. You can find it here.

    --
    "You can't have everything. Where would you keep it?" -- Steven Wright
  94. idea by nomadic · · Score: 2

    Tape a camcorder onto one handlebar, and hang a bang of blank video tapes on the other. When the film runs out, remove the video tape and toss it over your shoulder. Have a friend collect them.
    --

  95. How about using exsiting stuff? by Compaqed · · Score: 1

    You should look at stuff that already exsists.. it's not that expensive. Here is a place that sell what you are exactly looking for.

    --
    ------88-------- Sig? Sorry, I don't smoke.
  96. Re: little bike light dynamo vs. solar by CodeShark · · Score: 1
    I understand your point, but don't have enough knowledge to realistically agree or disagree, which is why I put this secondary post up.

    The two questions which IMHO would need to be answered to favor a dynamo over a solar panel would be

    a) which creates more of a drag burden, the dynamo on the wheel, or the weight and aerodynamic drag of the solar panel? and

    b)if the base drag in item a) favors the dynamo, does this advantage continue even with the supporting electronics required to deliver the kind of presumably non-spiky power to the electronic devices in terms of voltage?

    By the way, if you look at these voltage and current output figures for a crystalline solar cell, a small (12"x12") module would provide well more than enough power (over 100 watts) to the system. So huge isn't required.
    --
    ...Open Source isn't the only answer -- but it's almost always a better value than the alternatives...