Slashdot Mirror


Seagate Claims New Drive Silent and Fastest

yknott writes "It seems that Seagate just released a virtually silent hard drive. It emits only 2.0 bels while spinning and 2.4 bels while seeking; the human ear can't hear sounds below 2.5 bels. No more grinding sounds! It features Fluid Dynamic Bearings, and has an internal transfer rate of 69.3 Megabytes per second. " I'm currently questing to build a quieter computer - and while I'd love to test this, I will definitely say that Silent Drives I recently bought from New England Digital is awesome - but is rated to only work with 5400 rpms drives.

213 comments

  1. Shouldn't it the dept be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'll-believe-it-when-i-hear-it?

    1. Re:Shouldn't it the dept be by Lao-Tzu · · Score: 1

      Or rather, 'I'll-believe-it-when-I-don't-hear-it'.

  2. Ponder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe im dumb, but why dont companies work more on getting hard disks with no moving parts like alot of portable storage devices out now. Would this not increase speed also?

    1. Re:Ponder by Eccles · · Score: 2

      Currently you can buy such devices. if your willing to pay 30 thousand for a 2 gig drive.

      What's the power consumption of PC100/133 SDRAM? Seems to me one could get a few DIMM slots and some control logic, and create a solid state drive for perhaps $100 more than the cost of the RAM. Only problem is it would need to be on all the time toi refresh (thus the power consumption relevance) or used for things like swap (which, if your main memory is RAMBUS or your system has a relatively low max RAM, isn't a bad idea.)

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:Ponder by iainl · · Score: 1

      Thats a simple one to answer - if a hard drive doesn't have any moving parts, like, say a read/write head or platter, then it _is_ one of these portable storage devices. The big difference is capacity for price. I dread to think how expensive 72Gb of SmartMedia would be.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:Ponder by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

      wouldn't work. RAM needs power to store data. without power it losses all of its data. now if someone could do that with standard sdram i would like to know how (not a ramdisk)

      Qua

    4. Re:Ponder by sir_nas · · Score: 1

      aye...when i worked for a small mom&pop style computer shop which built computers/etc, we did a server for a local government facility which contained one of these. however, it was only a 64mb drive, used only for one purpose. boot drive. it made perfect sense, use a 64mb drive as a boot drive, and the 5 60gb's as raid storage. mind you, while the drive was fast and quiet, it was very expensive, $400 for that 64mb drive IIRC.

    5. Re:Ponder by yknott · · Score: 1

      I think he ment a solid state device. Currently you can buy such devices. if your willing to pay 30 thousand for a 2 gig drive. It's fast as hell and quiet as hell but is it worth that much?

    6. Re:Ponder by yknott · · Score: 1

      That uses a hard drive.

  3. Silent? It's not that hard.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    I'm currently questing to build a quieter computer


    Come on... it's not -that- hard to build a quiet computer. Right under my desk I've got a 600MHz running at 900, and it's virtually silent. I'm using the stock powersuply (from Inwin, it's a Powerman), a 7200RPM drive, a CD-ROM and my burner. Oh, yeah, and the two 120mm fans running on 7V (instead of the normal 12V. One's on intake in the front, one exhausting out a blowhole on top)).

    In my experience, the two biggest causes of noise in most computers are cheap heatsink fans and cheap (or excessively fast) CD drives. A good 7200RPM drive shouldn't be making that much noise (and if you want 10k, why not RAID?).

    Cheap cases are another thing to watch out for, since a cheap, flimsy case will, instead of dampening noise, act like a giant sounding board, converting all stray vibrations inside into noise.
  4. A quiet drive alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    After spending some dough on the SilentDrive enclosures, I suddenly realized that there is another alternative: Laptop drives! They are pretty quiet and can be converted to use a standard 40-pin connector. I'm not sure if you can get an 80-pin cable to work (UDMA 66/100), but it's worth a shot.

  5. Do we really need this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    OK, so the grinding noise can be a bit much at times (especially if you're short on DIMMs and using a swap file a lot), but I kinda find it reassuring - I don't have to constantly check the little amber light on the front of my box to make sure something's going on, and if I'm in Windows (yes, I dual boot, because I like playing Oni) I can tell if it decides to do something sneaky behind my back (though since I've purged it of most of that stuff this isn't as much of an issue).

    Also, my case fans make way more noise than this : )

    Frankly, I'd rather spend my cash on more space or speed than I would on how loud it is. Hell, you can't even impress your friends with it (My drive's quieter than yours!).

    Club-Foot.co.uk - even more pointless than /.

    Dr_Cheeks (can't post using my account [110261] after the mess with moderation on the OSDN-going-down story the other day - apparently I ended up modded down more than 5 times even though I got modded back up again - my karma is at 49 right now)

    1. Re:Do we really need this? by Silverfish · · Score: 2

      The push for quiter drives isn't as much for PC's as it is for the so called "convergance devices".

      Nobody wants to listen to the hard drive in their Tivo when they're watching TV.

  6. Silent cpu-cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Hello. I recently build myself a computer very near to 0 sound with an overclocked duron. I used a zalman 3100G heatsink(pure cooper gold coated) and a 12cm fan runing at 5V that blows fresh air over it since is mounted in the case door. I removed the PSU fan(since the big fan blows to outside trough the psu) and other ingenious and nice loking air exhaust with aluminium grilles. Big fans produce less noise due to less RPM, if you don't know. Even less if you run them at less voltage. The insides of the case are poliurethane coated, also the HD lies in a bed of the same material. Really not so complex job. The zalman heatsink cost about 60$, but the psu and other components are regular ones. see http://zalmantech.com/

  7. Johnny "Seagate" Dangerously by bjb · · Score: 2
    I'll kick you in the fargin' bels!
    -Roman Maroni


    --
    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  8. Ahh, the perfect machine? by Lally+Singh · · Score: 2
    Put that into a mac cube and you've got a completely silent, completely beautiful little device. remove the monitor & kb, pop on os x, and you've got a fileserver that can also be you're little apple alter :-)

    --

    --
    Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
  9. Re:Are drives so noisy??? by Christian+Smith · · Score: 1


    Now, as someone else commented about CDs and DVDs, YES, PLEASE, QUIET THESE HORRIBLE CONTRAPTIONS. My CD on my work computer has a cache that's just big enough to allow the drive to spin down for about 1/2 a second during a big transfer. Then it spins back up and transfers more. It's loud, it's annoying, and it turns this 40 some odd X CD Rom to about 10X.


    Thats where caddy based CDROMs come in handy. My Plextor 32 speed drive can barely be heard. A great drive (though it isn't entirely agreeing with my new Muse album:( My guess is that is the CD though)

  10. Re:at every turn by Glytch · · Score: 5

    LEDS softly blinking,
    Yet no hum of cooling fan.
    What evil magic this?

  11. transfer rate is bad performance metric!! by khuber · · Score: 1

    But what are the seek times?

    Transfer rates are not very indicative of
    useful performance.

    When I see 20,000RPM + FDB + SCSI, I'll
    be interested.

    -Kevin

  12. Re:Submerge hard drive in box of mineral oil. by unitron · · Score: 2

    And since hard drives actually aren't air tight, but have a little air filter, once the oil displaces the air inside the drive it will be very, very quiet. Forever.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  13. Re:Are drives so noisy??? by unitron · · Score: 2
    The caddy probably has a lot less to do with it than the drive itself. Plextors are supposedly of higher quality than most, they're certainly priced as though they were.

    Unfortunately my budget only allows me to explore the quality level of whatever off-brand Staples or Circuit City is offering a rebate on, some of which are almost as quiet as your average helicopter.

    My experience with caddy-type audio CD drives (but not enough caddies for all the CDs) back when I worked in radio only re-inforced my opinion that whoever decided that CDs should be sold "bare" instead of in a rugged shuttered case like a 3.5 inch floppy should have their own special torment awaiting in the afterlife.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  14. Re:Captain Ramius, Seagate Engineer by unitron · · Score: 2
    "The more I watch, the more I learn-
    If you set yourself on fire, the world will pay to watch you burn."

    Unfortunately the government of South Vietnam just laughed and made barbecue jokes.

    Yes, that was way off-topic. Excellent Clancy parody, btw.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  15. Re:Bels or deciBels? by unitron · · Score: 2
    You're both misinformed. A decibel is one-tenth of a Bel. One Bel is equal to ten decibels. Two and one-half Bels is equal to 10 decibels times 2 and one-half. 10 * 2.5 = 25. 2.5 Bels is 25 decibels.

    The prefix "deci" means "one-tenth". The prefix "deca" means "times ten". One hundred millimeters is ten centimeters is one decimeter is one-tenth of a meter is one-one-hundredth of a decameter. Yes, those are units of length, not sound pressure levels. It's an example.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  16. Hearing limit? by rew · · Score: 1

    the human ear can't hear sounds below 2.5 bels.

    Hmm. I thought the hearing limit was 0 bels (0 decibels).

    Of course working around loud fans for years will probably degrade your hearing to the mentioned level....

    Roger.

  17. Fastest? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1
    I hardly think this is the fastest drive alive. Seagate specifies the seek time at 8.9 ms. Their X15 drive, possibly the fastest drive on the market, is specified at 3.9 ms. The new drive has 40 GB per platter, but the X15 has 3.7 GB. Scaling for the X15's 2.6" platters and the Barracuda's slow spindle speed and lack of platters, the Barracuda might have a 14% advantage over the X15 in sequential transfer rate.

    When rotational latency is factored in, the Barracuda should have an access time of about 15.4 ms, while the X15 has a measured access time of 6.8 ms. Access time is the most important aspect of disk drive performance, and the X15 has a 225% advantage over the Barracuda in that category. Barracuda's 14% STR advantage can never make up for the disparity.

    Perhaps Seagate meant to claim the fastest drive ever to hold the name Barracuda ATA?

  18. Re:Impressive... by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    Point of fact factboy: Each "side" of a DVD is actually 9GB given that it's multilayer in about 99.99% of cases (which anyone who owns a DVD player knows as there's a microscopic delay during the layer change in movies).

    However, I will cede that indeed I miscalculated the data rate for DVDs and I do humbly prostrate myself for this error. Please forgive me.

  19. Re:Impressive... by ergo98 · · Score: 2

    Of course that particular factoid is bogus. i.e. They took the data rate of DVD (~8MB/second) and divided it into the throughput, and then state that that's how many simultaneous streams can be played. Of course anyone who's ever actually tried that knows that the constant seeking between the streams absolutely BRUTALIZES throughput, so unless you had 8 streams encoded intertwined there isn't a chance in hell.

  20. Re:The human ear by PD · · Score: 2

    The scale is logarithmic because, get this, the human ear has a logarithmic response.

    So while I'm sure there's some variation over the entire range, if you were to do a test, plotting the smallest noticible change in sound pressure on log graph paper, you'd wind up with a more or less straight line.

  21. Re:The human ear by AviN · · Score: 2

    Perhaps they can't hear it through a computer case, though?

  22. Re:Impressive... by GoRK · · Score: 2

    And of course your point is totally and completely bogus too since the data rate of DVD is a maximum of 10 Mega*Bits* per second and on average is somewhere between 3.5 and 5.5. That means for 8 streams, your drive needs to provide a MAXIMUM of 10MB/s and on average will need to provide about 4-5MB/s throughput while seeking between 8 files. This is a very impressive number even still for an IDE drive as anyone who has ever worked with nonlinear video systems knows as capture systems adhering to the CCIR-601 digital standard require 167Mb/s datarate. This would mean that the 4.7GB of a single sided DVD could hold about 4 minutes of video.

    Stop spewing and start using your brain.

    ~GoRK

  23. Some people are by samael · · Score: 2

    Some people _are_ throwing money at solid state tech. And some people are throwing money at hard disks. The ones throwing money at hard disks are keeping waaaay ahead of the solid state people, indicated that perhaps solid state drives of massive size aren't that easy to produce...
    _____

  24. bels? by ndege · · Score: 1

    I think they mean decibels. There is a diff you know. ARG...I know only enough physics to become annoyed by such statements.
    ---

    --
    Sig Return: 204 No Content
    1. Re:bels? by DBMandrake · · Score: 1

      Nice try, but no cigar :)

      20 dB is 10 times _voltage_ (when measuring an electrical signal that is) or in other words 100 times the power into a fixed impedance.

      Power x2 = 3 dB
      Voltage x2 = 6 dB
      Power x10 = 10 dB
      Voltage x10 = 20 dB

      Power x20 = 13 dB
      Power x100 = 20 dB

    2. Re:bels? by DBMandrake · · Score: 1

      DUH.

      Maybe next time I should read a post more carefully before replying. Your figures are correct....but so are mine :)

    3. Re:bels? by revin · · Score: 2

      A decibel is one-tenth of a Bel.
      It is a measurement system that was developed by the telephone company to determine the output level of a line. dB can be used to measure voltage, and power, as well as sound.
      It is a relative measure based on a logarithmic scale. That is, 20 dB is 10 times the power of 10 dB. 30 dB is 10 times the power of 20 dB, or 100 times the power of 10 dB. You essentially double the energy with every 3 dB increase.

  25. Current Maxtor 5400rpm drives are silent enough by Splork · · Score: 1

    I can not hear either recent 46gb or 80gb maxtor 5400rpm drives operating at all. why do i need quieter than that as long as there are other noiser components in the system (such as my pc power and cooling silencer power supply, the cpu fan, and the cd-rom drive's motor).

    now if only the noisy ibm hard drives in laptops would quiet down.

  26. Re:The human ear by ethereal · · Score: 1

    I thought it was weird that the article was specifying sound in bels, rather than decibels. Are you sure you're comparing the right units? Although I assume that 0db == 0 bels anyway.

    The stated hearing cutoff of 2.5 bels would be 25 decibels, which is definitely loud enough to hear.

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  27. Re:Anand is an idiot by ethereal · · Score: 1

    A lot more than from you - let's see your web site that gets more hits and has more info than yours. Also, I'm pretty sure he's not 12 anymore.

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  28. Re:Solid state by foxtrot · · Score: 1

    I doubt the power use thing-- compare the battery life of a portable device using compactflash against the battery life of the same device with an IBM Microdrive.

    I begin to wonder if battery-backed-up RAM isn't a good idea. With SDRAM down to fifty bucks for a quarter-gig at Crucial (and I suspect you can find it cheaper), if you gotta have _really_ fast storage, a kilobuck gets you a five gig of solid state. Sure, that's a drop in the bucket compared to that 80GB IDE (or bigger!) but it's damned fast in the same comparison.

    On the other hand, it doesn't work well in the state most of my machines are in at the moment-- powered down in a storage facility...

    -JDF

  29. Re:Anand is an idiot by rleyton · · Score: 2

    It actually appears to be a pretty much verbatim copy of the Seagate press release (Well, at least the online version)

    --
    ooooooh! What does this button do? - DeeDee, Dexters Lab.
  30. Impressive... by rleyton · · Score: 3
    The drive's record-breaking internal transfer rate -- 69.3 Mbytes per second -- is fast enough to copy an hour of MP3 music in under one second. Barracuda ATA IV is fast enough to stream eight movies simultaneously, in DVD quality, without dropping a frame

    Blimey. Genuinely impressive. Now I only need to buy myself eight televisions.

    --
    ooooooh! What does this button do? - DeeDee, Dexters Lab.
    1. Re:Impressive... by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 1
      Of course that particular factoid is bogus. i.e. They took the data rate of DVD (~8MB/second) and divided it into the throughput, and then state that that's how many simultaneous streams can be played. Of course anyone who's ever actually tried that knows that the constant seeking between the streams absolutely BRUTALIZES throughput, so unless you had 8 streams encoded intertwined there isn't a chance in hell.
      No, it's still close. Let's prove 4 streams.
      Article says there's a 69.3 MB/s throughput, a 2 MB buffer, and an 8.9 msec average seek time. Let's assume the average seek time.
      Time 0: seek to Stream 1.(takes 8.9 ms)
      Time 8.9: read 0.5 megabytes.(takes 7.21 ms)
      [7.21 is (0.5 megs / 69.3 throughput)]
      Time 16.11: seek to Stream 2.(takes 8.9 ms)
      Time 25.01: read 0.5 megabytes.(takes 7.21)
      Time 32.22: seek to stream 3.(takes 8.9 ms)
      Time 41.12: read 0.5 megabytes.(takes 7.21)
      Time 48.33: seek to stream 4.(takes 8.9 ms)
      Time 57.23: read 0.5 megabytes.(takes 7.21 ms)
      Time 64.44: give software your 2meg buffer.

      Now 4 streams at 8MB/sec = 32 megs per second.
      That means you need 2 megabytes of data every (2/32=) 0.0625 seconds.
      You only actually get 2 megabytes of data every 0.06444 seconds (as shown above), which means you need a seek time just slightly better than average, and we're assuming that software will cache 0.5 megs ahead in each stream. If there's enough RAM, you can cache significantly more than that. (So that software asks for 5 megabytes at a time, in each of the streams one after the other. Then you approach what they say is 8 streams. I don't think it's unreasonable to assume software that caches more than just 0.5 megs, or one sixteenth of a second.)
      ~
  31. Re:Solid state by rleyton · · Score: 4

    Have a read of The Innovators Dilemma - When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail - One of the main examples used throughout the book is how the hard disk industry is moving very rapidly, but that even innovative companies breaking new ground in the market, and keeping their customers sweet, still fail and die. I don't have my copy with me, but there was an interesting diagram in the first few chapters, showing how solid state disks are catching up, and will overtake hard disks, in the next few years.

    --
    ooooooh! What does this button do? - DeeDee, Dexters Lab.
  32. Re:No regrets here by ddt · · Score: 2

    My problem with SCSI is that there is no power management support for it in Linux, so your drive will spin constantly while the machine is on. Besides wasting electricity, this wears out your drive, and it starts to make more noise. My last SCSI brick started keening at a terrible pitch after about a year of constant operation. I won't buy SCSI again until the power management controls are up to IDE standards in the Linux kernel.

    God, I can't wait for mass storage to go solid state. :)

  33. iMac Hack! by Malic · · Score: 1

    I need one of these in my iMac. Then my machine will be really quiet!

    I disagree with the "but I like to hear noise" comment. After years of server room work, the white noise of computer equipment/cooling fans drives me crazy. It numbs my thoughts. Anything that can drive us to completely quiet machines is JUST the thing!


    --
    --
    I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
  34. Re:But I like the noise! by sharkey · · Score: 2

    And it's fun, too. Makes people jump if I power on my PC with multiple Cheetahs while their around. PHBs get worried when the box powers down, due to the "down-shifting from fifth to first" whine it emits.

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  35. Re:No regrets here by sharkey · · Score: 2

    They DO have a name in the ATA industry. It's "Mud."

    --

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  36. Deci vs. deca by Ilmari · · Score: 2
    Your'e thingking of deca, which is 10x. Deci (as in deciliter), is 1/10th, so there are 10 decibels in one bel.

    --

    --

    © ilmari. All rights reserved, all wrongs reversed

  37. Silence has been underrated, this is good by ChrisDolan · · Score: 2

    Old job: dual fanned SGI O2 with three screaming external scsi disks on my desk -- I never really got to enjoy the great sound subsystem.

    New job: Powerbook G3 with external monitor (dual head! woohoo!), kbd, mouse -- the only sounds it makes are from the sound system (and occasional barely audible DVD-ROM seeks). There are fifteen of us, all with Powerbooks, in one large room with NO cube walls and the loudest sound is usually the clattering of keyboards and clicking of mice. It's truly amazing how big a difference it makes.

    Local disk storage was nice (fast!) but remote disk access is a price worth paying for quiet.

  38. Re:Solid state by Chris+Colohan · · Score: 1
    With the development that the rest of the computer industry undergoes (ref. Moores Law) - why has the development in the HD department been in a state of virtual stand-still?

    I am not sure if you are serious or not. If you compare the trends in storage to the trends in CMOS fabrication, you will find that the rate of change in storage capacities, price per MB, and transfer rates leave Moore's Law in the dust.

    Why is this? It is because CMOS benefits primarily from improvements in photolithography. Hard drive heads are made using photolithography as well -- and every time you can produce smaller chips, you can also produce smaller hard drive heads. This means they are more precise, and can squeeze more data into less space. If you improve storage density, you make hard drives larger, faster (you have to move the head less to reach your data), and cheaper (you can use fewer platters to store the same amount of data). There is research into the materials used to store the data itself. Any improvements in the materials also improves the density of storage. In addition, there is the control circuitry used to position the heads -- if you improve the control you can decrease the seek time as well as improve the accuracy of positioning -- this also allows you to use tighter track spacing, getting more data onto the disk. All of these effects combine, meaning that progress in hard drives does not just match Moore's Law, but exceeds it.

    Why not ditch this ancient tech and pour some more $$ into developing affordable solid-state disks?

    Because moving media is orders of magnitude cheaper and more durable. But if you are looking for research projects dealing with new storage technologies, why don't you start here or here?

  39. at every turn by womby · · Score: 2

    one by one each element in my computers are becoming silent. after so many years living in such a noisy environment means I have trouble sleeping without the noise I become so uncomefortable. soon I will have to buy a karma-moods cd of fan noises just so I can sleap in comfort

    --
    **** lying is wrong even for sleeping dogs
  40. marketing units? by Polo · · Score: 2

    Are they using 'bels' in a way to confuse the issue and make the number seem smaller than units that are more commonly used? Kind of like $9.95 is significantly less that $10.00

    Wouldn't 2 bels be the same as 20 decibels? It's routine to measure fan noise in decibels and quiet ones are about 25 decibels. But using a different unit like "2 bels" makes it seem like the drive is REALLY quiet.

    anyone else think this?

  41. Re:Seagate being quiet.... ironic by CSC · · Score: 1
    As an owner of three old Seagate drives (150, 250, 520 Mb anyone ;-) I've always considered Seagate to make the nosiesest drives in the world.

    As the owner of an old Ford T, I have always considered Ford to make the worst cars in the world.

    --
    -- Colin
  42. Re:bels v decibels by CSC · · Score: 1
    The term bel is used to indicate a factor of ten in a power ratio. Decibel denotes one-tenth of this factor on a logarithmic scale. Also, the choice of logarithmic scale has nothing to do with the model of human hearing.

    First, your response has nothing to do with my post. :)

    Second, the choice of logarithmic scale has everything to do with human hearing. We "feel" a linear increase when sound pressure varies exponentially. Hence the logarithmic scale.

    Slightly offtopic: that's the basis behind some very basic MIC encodings for phone voice: using a logarithmic quantization instead of a linear quantization (where the source signal is the sound pressure from the mike) with the same 8 bit/sample

    --
    -- Colin
  43. Re:The human ear by CSC · · Score: 2
    deci is just the SI prefix meaning 10x, a decibel is equal to ten bels. The logarithmic scale would apply to all floating point forms of the bel just the same.

    Uh, not. The prefix for 10x is deca, not deci. So a decibel is a tenth of a bel.

    --
    -- Colin
  44. Maxtor's been there, done that by DannyGene · · Score: 3

    Maxtor has been doing this for a while. I bought a DiamondMax 60 about a year ago, and I've never heard a peep out of it. I tried to find some info on their site to link, but couldn't. I think they call it SilentStore, and it's been on most of their drives for awhile now. It is a bit disturbing for awhile, thinking that your computer isn't doing anything, till you look down at the blinking light! I'm not sure what the dB rating is on the Maxtor's, but if you've got a power supply and/or cpu fan, you'll be hard pressed to hear it.

    --
    *Life is too serious to be taken too seriously.*
  45. Re:I LIKE hearing it!!! by CBravo · · Score: 1

    Use Gkrellm, it shows you:
    -harddiskusage
    -ethernet activity
    -processor usage
    -(virtual) memory usage
    -and more...

    I prefer my computer quiet, and my programs showing me what is happening.

    --
    nosig today
  46. Re:The problem with FDB... by denormaleyes · · Score: 1
    Of course, if the head isn't sitting on the track and reading data into its buffers before the desired sector passes by, any request for the preceding sectors will require another rotational delay.

    How useful that is in practice would vary widely, I suspect.

  47. Hah! by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    Today's computers are already silent! I remember my first job, they didn't have a place to put me, so I got stuck in the computer room. Taught me how to deal with real noise:

    Two Genicom printers - a 4440 line printer and a 3820 open carriage (those were fun when others were running reports)
    A large RS6000 box
    An old Prime Minicomputer with open reel 9-track vacuum tape-drive, and power supply with large loud fans

    Later, they gave me an office, but stuck the 4440 in there with me...

    Everything else was silent - we used Wyse terminals for everything...

    Today's machines can't be compared - in fact, I miss the drone of that power supply...


    Worldcom - Generation Duh!

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  48. Re:But I like the noise! by wiredog · · Score: 2

    But don't you just love the machine-gun sound of the line printer when it gets a 100 page print job? It's great to see people dive for cover the first time they hear it.

  49. But I like the noise! by wiredog · · Score: 5
    It lets me know something's happening. The whacka-whacka of the heads seeking. Blinking lights on the panel. Status messages at the console. Kids these days don't know whether the darned thing's on or off!

    Sigh. There are times I really miss Vaxes.

    1. Re:But I like the noise! by prator · · Score: 2

      Whacka-whacka? Oh my god, this person has Pac-Man enslaved inside his computer.

      -prator

    2. Re:But I like the noise! by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      We'll end up having to abandon the term 'thrashing' for something that describes the sound the new drives make. 'Breathing heavily' perhaps? Exhaling? I dunno.

    3. Re:But I like the noise! by Sir+Tristam · · Score: 1
      The A/C can't keep up with it - it's always 80 degrees in that room...
      But if the AC can't keep up, shouldn't it be a couple hundered degrees in there by now? Maybe somebody just bent the little setting prong on the thermostat or taped an icecube to it.

      'Course, we had a guy who set his 21" monitor directly beneath the thermostat in his office, then always wondered why the temperature was great when he first got in in the morning but was like an icebox by the afternoon.

      Chris Beckenbach

    4. Re:But I like the noise! by dalinian · · Score: 1

      Hard drive noise when something's happening? Sounds like you don't have enough RAM or you are using Windows. :-)

    5. Re:But I like the noise! by maharg · · Score: 1

      yeah. Especially when you leave the cover up. Heh, Heh, Heh.

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    6. Re:But I like the noise! by The+Troll+Catcher · · Score: 1

      Heh... where I'm working right now (the Physics dept. at Kent State) we're using an LSI-11 (upgraded from a PDP-11) for data acquisition, and that thing is LOUD and HOT. The A/C can't keep up with it - it's always 80 degrees in that room (which happens to be where I work... grr). Let me tell you, it was NO fun when the steam line broke so there was no A/C...

      Old computers aren't all they're cracked up to be - they can be just a little too noisy and hot.

    7. Re:But I like the noise! by vla1den · · Score: 1

      It lets me know something's happening. Blinking lights on the panel.

      Yeah, I missed this too. But then, I took hard drive out of the SilentDrive enclosure, and boy, that was terrible! How could you guys stand this din? I put it back in a minute.

      Also, there is neat utility Diskmon that can act as disk activity LED in your system tray... Yeah, it's for Windows. I believe there should be something similar for your favorite OS.

      Add your best "Noise busters" link here


    8. Re:But I like the noise! by DarkWinter · · Score: 1
      5 insightful? Excuse me? Somehow the mods thought it was important to note that some people want unneeded feeback from their devices?

      Seriously. Remember the first generation of computer keyoards? All nice and quiet. But people didnt like using them. No clickity clickity like their old typewriter. That lead to the beast also known as the IBM Model M keyboard. Heavy and loud. Eventually keyboards got quiet. But the problem keeps popping up. My digital camera makes a shutter noise when I take a picture. A feature I dont want, but had to pay for.

      I'll tell you what. If you want, let the manufacturers make quiet drives. I'll write a utility for you that makes noise when your drive is being accessed, and you can pay me for it. That way we can both be happy.

      Geez, I'm crusty today

      --

      Even if it looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, you can't be sure until you see the RealDuck

  50. The human ear by chrysalis · · Score: 5

    "the human ear can't hear sounds below 2.5 bels"
    That's totally false. Humans can hear below 1 bel (except babies, older people, and people with ear diseases) . It's approximately twice the level of human breath.

    -- Pure FTP server - Upgrade your FTP server to something simple and secure.

    --
    {{.sig}}
    1. Re:The human ear by DebtAngel · · Score: 2

      No, deci is 0.1x, while deca is 10x. There for a bel is ten decibels.

      But then, since nothing except bels are measured in deci or deca in the real world, I could very well have that backwards.

      --

      Is this post not nifty? Sluggy Freelance. Worshi

    2. Re:The human ear by Sir+Tristam · · Score: 1
      But then, since nothing except bels are measured in deci or deca in the real world...
      Not even decades? <g>
    3. Re:The human ear by Ig0r · · Score: 2

      deci is just the SI prefix meaning 10x, a decibel is equal to ten bels.
      The logarithmic scale would apply to all floating point forms of the bel just the same.

      --

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    4. Re:The human ear by revin · · Score: 2

      Indeed, 0db is considered to be the lowest sound level that a human ear can hear. 1db is the lowest change a human hear can notice. i think they mean something about out of the frequency range a human can hear (20hz-18000hz)

    5. Re:The human ear by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      You're right. I can almost hear the hard drive by only reading about it.

      Or is that cuz of Windows' swapping policies?

    6. Re:The human ear by evvk · · Score: 1

      >But then, since nothing except bels are measured in deci or deca in the real world, I could very well have that backwards.

      Actually, decilitres (1dl=0.1l=0.1dm^3) are often used in baking recipes, for example.

    7. Re:The human ear by tb3 · · Score: 2

      I don't think that's quite right because the scale is logarithmic, i.e. 20 db is 100 times as loud as 10db. I'm not sure how bels and decibels relate; it does make sense that 10 decibels equals 1 bel, I'm just not sure how the log factor effects it.

      "What are we going to do tonight, Bill?"

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    8. Re:The human ear by kghougaard · · Score: 1

      Isn't it completely wrong to talk about "the lowest sound humans can hear"? Isn't the bell-scale defined as "some energy thing" measured 1 meter from the source? So I would think, that the lowest sound a human can hear, would depend on the distance????? It is easy to hear a human breathe if you stick your ear in his mouth! Ougar

      --
      He, who dies with the most toys, wins
    9. Re:The human ear by BrilliantComposer · · Score: 1

      According to a number of sources, the actual threshold of human hearing is actually zero decibels. A more commonly-reported threshold is 4 decibels. (0.4 bels).
      Because the dB scale is a logarithmic one, each additional ten decibels represents a tenfold increase in intensity, thus a 24dB sound is 100 times louder than a 4dB sound.
      I'm all for quieter drives and I applaud Seagate's efforts, but their claims are misleading by two orders of magnitude.
      Perhaps what they mean is that 24dB of drive noise falls below the threshold of P/S fan noise. But that's not what their press release states.

      Sources:
      capa6.phy.ohiou.edu/psc105/c3d/chap3c.html
      fridge.arch.uwa.edu.au/topics/acoustics/sound/hear ing.html
      fermi.bgsu.edu/~stoner/P202/sound/sld006.htm
      hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound/intens.h tml
      www.njnet.edu.cn/info/ebook/java/javagame/ch11.htm

  51. Re:Rotation Noise and Ear Fatigue by ErikZ · · Score: 2

    I knew a guy who started going deaf from sitting next to the mainframe fans, back when I was in the Air Force. They sent us all in for hearing tests.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  52. Can't hear it?!?!? NONSENSE!!! by volpe · · Score: 2
    the human ear can't hear sounds below 2.5 bels.

    Nonsense. BY DEFINITION, the threshold of hearing , which is the faintest sound the average person can hear, is zero dB (decibels). 2.5 bells, or 25 decibells, is a sound pressure 10 ^ 2.5, or 316 times as large as the threshold of hearing.

  53. Good for Microsoft by Navarre · · Score: 1

    Great. Now when your harddrive starts swapping
    like a machinegun, you won't be able to hear it anyway. Yet another way to hide M$'s inadequacies from the public.

    1. Re:Good for Microsoft by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 1

      I assume by your anti MS FUD that your a Linux advocate? And we have a Linux advocate ragging on MS about SWAPPING? Geez ghod man, what color is the sky in your world? You can't even PUT enough ram in a linux machine to keep 2 copies of netscape from swapping you to a kernal panic!

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  54. But have they perfected the failure rate yet? by bareman · · Score: 1

    Everytime I have had a system with a Seagate drive it has died within 3 years. I just assumed that they've built that into the drives.

    All the other hard drive brands have always lasted longer for me than I wanted to keep the computer.

  55. Re:Solid state by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2
    You forgot seek-time vs. no-seek-time and fragmentation-affects-access-time vs. doesn't.

    Also, a filesystem written for a solid-state disk can be substantially simpler because it doesn't have to take into account the physical realities of a spinning disk--you don't have to agonize over ordering writes to different parts of the disk; you just shovel it out and forget it.

    You can add journaling information and other integrity stuff if you feel like it. But you don't have to worry about where it goes.

    --

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  56. Re:Captain Ramius, Seagate Engineer by Feng · · Score: 1
    That deserves a +6, Funny! (if such a thing existed).

    Or you can do it with the Sean Connery accent: "Comradsches, Thisch isch your captain..."

    --


    --- if y cn rd ths y cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmmng!
  57. Re:Now all we need... by aonifer · · Score: 2

    Lots of people are mentioning PCP&C supplies, but I've found Enermax power supplies to be amazingly quiet despite having two fans. They cost less also. My power supply is actually quieter than my PCP&C CPU fan. They aren't kidding when they say "whisper."

  58. Re:No regrets here by xiox · · Score: 1

    Actually you're more likely to damage the drive by switching it on and off. Continuous use doesn't do much damage usually.

  59. Where have I heard this before? by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    Fluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB) motor ... Fujitsu got that working in 2000 "They've debuted fluid bearing motors in their MPF series. First introduced by Seagate in its 7200 RPM Medalist Pro, fluid bearings rapidly faded away as problems surfaced from the heat caused by leaked fluid."

    As for the noise, the Fujitus MPD3084ATs I got in 1999 had very little. Oh well :)

    Fujttsu may not be performance beasts, but for reliability, coolness, and quietness, they took the crown long ago.
    --

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  60. Re:TO CLEAR THINGS UP ON THE UNITS USED by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 2

    According to the encyclopedia Britanica: one bel= .1 decibles. In other words, for those of you who dont remember high school physics, a 2 bel hard drive is very quiet.

    You've got it the wrong way around- 1 bel is 10 decibels. Remember that "deci" is the metric suffix for 10^-1, "deka" is the metric suffix for 10. These drives are 25 dB when seeking.

  61. Re:Are drives so noisy??? by barneyfoo · · Score: 1
    if it's an IDE cdrom drive you could try this:

    • hdparm -A1 -a255 /dev/hdX


    Where "X" is your cdrom drive. This will set the filesystem readahead to maximum, so when it does spin up and starts reading it will read for longer.. Dunno though. You seem to have a retarded cdrom drive either way. You might also want to try this:

    • hdparm -E 20


    This command will set your cd drive to transfer at 20x. You could also try 30x or 35x. See what works.
  62. Bels or deciBels ? by manjunaths · · Score: 1

    If I remember my school physics correct. Bel is a very large measure so we decibels to measure sound. I think it is decibels not bels. 120 dB is the threshold of pain. So 2 bels is roughly 16 times of that.
    It should be 2 decibels not bels.

    --
    Slashdot: Tabloid for the nerds. Stuff that doesn't matter.
  63. Try 2x globalwin FEP32 by devapoj · · Score: 1

    Here's one way to make your hard drives seem quieter - use an abit bp6 with 2xglobalwin FEP32 fans. You can hardly hear the drives then as the fans drown out everything (including thought and sanity).

    On a more serious note, I've taken to using my old k6-2/300 more lately just because of the noise Its summer now here in the UK, so I have to remove the case or else it overheats... in winter its just about bearable...

    --

    Karma makes sense. It makes a lot more sense if you add reincarnation.

    1. Re:Try 2x globalwin FEP32 by cougio · · Score: 1
      Yep - I finally broke down and bought an AC

      Cool! I didn't know you could buy an AC and break it down: I want one! "You bastard are gunna pay for all those Anonymous Cowards that have been mocking me over the years!!".

      What do you mean I don't make sense?

    2. Re:Try 2x globalwin FEP32 by Aztech · · Score: 2

      Don't worry mate, overheating isn't exactly a long-term problem, the last three days were the English summer, it's all over now, evidently proven today. Blink and you could miss it.

      I had an Athlon tripping alarms off when it hit 65c a couple of days ago, never seem that before.

    3. Re:Try 2x globalwin FEP32 by motorsabbath · · Score: 1

      Yep - I finally broke down and bought an AC just for my home office to defeat both - (1) so it's nice and cool ack there and (2) to drown out the noise of the 5 (count'em 5) fans in my PC case. Now it's nice and cool back there but I can still hear my PC fans over my AC hehe.

      On a side note - even with a 1.2 Gig TBird, my PC stays around room temperature which isn't too bad. I was dripping sweat into my keyboard one day (before the AC) and the PC wasnt really any hotter than the room, so no overheating. Fong-Kai 603 case and a GlobalWin cpu fan seems to do well together.

      Cheers - JB

      --
      The heat from below can burn your eyes out
    4. Re:Try 2x globalwin FEP32 by daniel_isaacs · · Score: 1
      Right on. I haven't heard my hard drives make any noise in over a year ( same mobo, similar HSF). Add in the PS Fan and two more case fans, and I can't even hear myself think. I need headphones to listen to mp3's. On the plus side, It heats my computer room during the Winter.

      While this is a nice development, I'll be more impressed when Intel or AMD throws a passive cooling CPU (ala the G3/4) into the mix. Give me 1Ghz that doesn't require a ready supply of liquid Nitrogen to keep cool, and I'll be impressed.

      --
      - Dan I.
  64. Re:Solid state by LocalYokel · · Score: 1
    First of all, are you sure that you replied to the right comment?

    HD's have been making huge jumps. Nobody's interested. While that 137GB Maxtor drive could hold a lot of pr0n, I have 35 mirrored gigabytes at home for _all of_ my personal storage/archives, not just pr0n, and I barely put a dent into it.

    The end users that do need this kind of space are the ones with DV cams, but they need expensive SCSI disks to do things properly. I've seen people try it with striped IDE, but the SCSI solution always wins.

    --

    --

    --
    E2 IN2 IE?

  65. ... not nearly so quiet by Coot · · Score: 1

    Maxtor/Quantum's tech is called Quiet Drive and was out in 1999. But their drives are all above 3 bels. For example, all the 5400RPM drives are 3.3 bels. They have a whitepaper touting this technology that shows all but the least Fireball drives to be above 3 bels. The new Seagate drives are 2 bels (reportedly) ... huge difference.

    --

    --
    “Doh!”

  66. 3 to set up a raid. by eightball · · Score: 1

    I would suggest that is why he said 3 drives, to set up a raid to get back some of the performance.

    1. Re:3 to set up a raid. by Izmunuti · · Score: 1

      RAIDs can potentially help with throughput but they hurt latency. Now instead of the latency of one drive, you have the worst-case latency of N drives because the controller has to get data from each of the drives in the RAID before it can be combined into one stream for the host. Using slower RPM drives in the RAID compounds the problem.

    2. Re:3 to set up a raid. by yknott · · Score: 1

      Performance is only meaningfully increased if using RAID 0. Sure, with RAID 5 you get some increase, but the processing power to determine the parity can slow you down if you dont have a dedicated card to do so.

  67. Captain Ramius, Seagate Engineer by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 3
    Comrades! This is your captain- It is an honor to speak to you today! And I'm honored to be sailing with you on the maiden voyage of our Motherland's most recent achievement. And once more, we play our dangerous game. A game of chess....against our old adversary...the IBM hard drive engineer. For 40 years, your fathers before you and your older brothers played this game...and played it well. But today, the game is different. WE have the advantage! It reminds me of the heady days of Sputnik and Yuri Gagarin when the world trembled at the sound of our transfer speeds - and they will tremble again - at the sound of our silence. The order is: engage the silent drive!

    The more I watch, the more I learn-

    1. Re:Captain Ramius, Seagate Engineer by garbs · · Score: 1

      If only I had some mod points.

      Haven't had a good laugh in a long time.

      --

    2. Re:Captain Ramius, Seagate Engineer by Slomojokoko · · Score: 1

      Damn that's funny!

      Pass the vodka, Comrade, and let us toast the ingenuity of Mother Russia!

  68. Re:Rotation Noise and Ear Fatigue by RevRigel · · Score: 2

    Actually, that's not the jet's engines. That's the APU. It's a diesel turbine (so it's a jet engine in some sense, but at most the size of a small car, including all the electrical components). It supplies 48V (I think) to the power bus of the plane, and also powers the starter motors for the main engines. That's what allows the cockpit computers and so on to function before they turn the main engines on, and to still function in the case of a flame-out. It's the rough equivalent of a car battery.

  69. Silent Drive?! by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    But I thought the Red October was dismantled! The caterpillar drive had some fatal flaws that would prevent it from ever being...

    Oh. Silent HARD drive. That's different. Does Alec Baldwin know about this?

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  70. WRONG!! by blakestah · · Score: 2

    It seems that Seagate just released a virtually silent hard drive. It emits only 2.0 bels while spinning and 2.4 bels while seeking; the human ear can't hear sounds below 2.5 bels.

    Human hearing thresholds are close to a tenth of the noise of this hard drive.

    However, ambient noise will almost always exceed 25 dB.

    1. Re:WRONG!! by blakestah · · Score: 2

      One bel is .1 of a decible.

      Right.

      And one deciliter is 10 liters. One decimeter is 10 meters, and you need to go back to second grade and learn it properly this time.

      20-25 dB is still rather quiet. One would never listen to radio or television at this level. Conversations are largely held at 50 dB and up.

  71. You've got that backwards by Shoden · · Score: 1
    According to the encyclopedia Britanica: one bel= .1 decibles.

    From the Britannica dictionary we get the following:

    Main Entry: bel
    Pronunciation: 'bel
    Function: noun
    Etymology: Alexander Graham Bell
    Date: 1929
    : ten decibels

    And their encyclopedia entry states:

    The unit in general use is the decibel (abbreviated db), equal to 0.1 bel.
  72. Are drives so noisy??? by Pedrito · · Score: 2

    I bought an IBM PC300GL (actually, my company bought it for me, but I digress)... I don't know what kind of hard drive it has, but I've never heard it.

    Personally, I feel more confident if I hear something. I like it quiet, but when it's seeking, I like to hear that, just a little. I don't know why.

    The only thing I can really hear on my 300GL is the fan, which itself is awefully quiet.

    Now, as someone else commented about CDs and DVDs, YES, PLEASE, QUIET THESE HORRIBLE CONTRAPTIONS. My CD on my work computer has a cache that's just big enough to allow the drive to spin down for about 1/2 a second during a big transfer. Then it spins back up and transfers more. It's loud, it's annoying, and it turns this 40 some odd X CD Rom to about 10X.



    1. Re:Are drives so noisy??? by Pedrito · · Score: 2

      Do I type this at the DOS prompt ;-)

  73. Get a Silcencer fan! by WD · · Score: 2

    Seriously... pick up one of these. Any power supply should be able to be retro-fitted with one of them. No need to buy a whole new PS.

  74. Re:best of both worlds by CaseyG · · Score: 1
    The SilentDrive is rated by heat dissipation, and Seagate claims that the ATA IV has "minimal heat dissipation."

    SilentDrive can accomodate up to 5w heat output, which they say is average for 5400 RPM drives. This drive, at 7200 RPM, should work fine.

    -c.
    --

    --
    Casey

    More scratches on the cave wall, thanks be to anonymity.

  75. Tech. support by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 5

    - Costumer service, how can I help you ?

    - It's this damn drive you sold me. It's broken. I bought it, installed in my computer and it won't boot.

    - Uh, did you partition and format it before using ?

    - No, but I don't need to do it to know it's not working.

    - Why ?

    - Listen, kid, I know what I'm doing. I have experience with computers. I built mine myself. And this drive is dead. It makes no noise. And I just installed it, and, yes, the power cable's on.

    - (thinking) It's going to be a long day.

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
  76. server rooms by PharCyDE · · Score: 1

    i need my computer on to sleep, i know its weird but after a year of sleeping 3 feet away from my computer and its 8 fans, i can no longer sleep with out them even when i go into a server room, i get sleepy because of all the noise

    1. Re:server rooms by pizen · · Score: 2

      A classic case of Pavlov's engineer.
      ---

  77. Apple by localman · · Score: 1

    Expect Apple to include their next revisions - they're nuts about silent computers.

  78. I'll miss it by Mr.roboto · · Score: 1

    That sound has become a part of me. Whenever the power goes out in my room (I didn't do it, honest!) It'll cause my to jump up at 5:00 or whenever it happens, it freaks me out when I hear all my hard drives spinning down at once, especially since most of em are from the 80s and louder than ever.

    --
    Don't call my crazy, that's what they called me back in the home!
  79. Re:Seagate being quiet.... ironic by Tarpan · · Score: 1

    You know... most channels (atleast here in sweden) have a sort of discrete logo in one of the corners of the screen all the time. And i got no problem with it, as long as it isn't moving or flashing or something similar! *condemns vh1 to hell*

    Same thing with harddrives, i don't mind if they make some small sounds when they are working, as long as it isn't unbearable. My computer fans makes a hell of a lot more noise then my harddrives anyway.

  80. Re:Home web servers with ADSL by Forrestina · · Score: 1
    this is already really common. most everyone i know runs a website from their house. my apartment currently has 2 dsl lines, mine and my roomates. his has romhat.net, mine has truffula.net.

    it's just not that hard to setup a linux box to do all my e-mail, and serve pages for my friends, and any other assorted projects.

    -------

    --

    -------
    "don't smoke, don't drink, don't fuck
    at least i can fucking think"
    Minor Threat

  81. anti-noise? by small_dick · · Score: 2

    why not put an a/d and d/a on the mobo, with a better speaker, and use anti-noise to quiet the internal case noise down?


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.

    --


    Treatment, not tyranny. End the drug war and free our American POWs.
    See my user info for links.
    1. Re:anti-noise? by groomed · · Score: 1

      Because the noise shouldn't be there in the first place ... duh.

  82. Re:Anand is an idiot by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

    Anand's "News&quot headline thing on the left is a merging of the four "News" sections he has. The Seagate "story" is under the Press Releases section which is why it's pretty much verbatim as with everything else in that section.

  83. Maxtor is silent too by Halo1 · · Score: 2

    The stock 20GB Maxtor in my G4/400 is completely silent as well, I can't even hear it when I put my ear against the case (of the computer, not of the drive :)

    --

    --
    Donate free food here
  84. Re:Rotation Noise and Ear Fatigue by Irritant · · Score: 1

    You can get a special small cable to attach between the two 10k drives to sync the spindles (for RAID purposes, but works even when not using RAID), as long as they're both from the same manufacturer.

  85. cool idea by avandesande · · Score: 1

    One way to cool a pc would be to attach a copper strap on the cpu at one end, and the other end to the case. This would probably cool the cpu with just surface area.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  86. Re:Damn yankee by kfg · · Score: 1

    Hey, even some of us Yankees have ten fingers AND know how to count on them.

    KFG

  87. Re:Damn yankee by kfg · · Score: 1

    They are my actual initials.

    But I like "Kentucky Fried Geek."

    KFG

  88. Good idea but.. by ellem · · Score: 1

    If the harddrive is silent then the only sounds I'll hear are the fans and my weeping.
    ---

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  89. Get the heat out! by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    The main problem related to loud PCs, esp with the giant heaters otherwise known as x86 processors, is heat and airflow. The P4 and Athlon chips produce insane amounts of heat and video cards and northbridges now have THEIR own fans. A 128MB stick of PC133 RAM pumps out 10W of heat. Add case fans, and all you do is push hot air over all the heatsinks in the system.
    The trick is to get the heat out of the box, then exchange it into the environment. Watercooling is the answer. (Or buy a Mac cube, with no fans).

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  90. Re:Noise? by DCheesi · · Score: 1

    You've either got some very quiet machines, or a very loud ceiling fan!

    Assuming it's the later, where did you get these amazing machines?

  91. Getting closer to quiet computers by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

    Now if only the CD and DVD players would shut up when they are spinning a disc...

    1. Re:Getting closer to quiet computers by Tech187 · · Score: 2

      A number of years back I started noticing how much noisier the new faster-spinning CD-ROM drives were getting. It seemed like some disks were noisier than other disks. Then I realized this was probably because some disks were more out of balance. I decided to start experimenting. I put little bits of tape on some disks to see how it would affect the sound of the drive. Little bits of tape made the drive a little louder, the more tape I added the drive got noisier. Then I got the bright idea to tape a small metal washer to a disk.

      The drive spun up after I inserted that disk and shook the case so hard that it was impossible to eject the disk. The roar rose up over the cubicle wall and threatened to draw attention to the experiment being conducted in R&D that morning. (needless to say this isn't the sort of experiment one does with personally owned equipment!) I ended up having to kill power and use a Macintool (one of those bent paperclips Mac users keep handy) to eject the CD.

      I've wondered for some time what has happened to reliability figures with the new 'rocket engine' CD drives. Surely reliability is being compromised to attain the higher performance on the faster drives. One of those tradeoffs where the '48x max' pad printed on the outside of the drive case becomes the only bullet point that matters.

  92. The problem with FDB... by edmudama · · Score: 5

    The problem with FDB motors is they generate about 15-18C more heat in normal operation. You better have monster airflow around the thing if you want to keep the sucker cool.

    Most drives run around 30-35C in normal operation, and will guarantee they work up to mid-50s. (55C is pretty standard)

    Oh, and if your drive *does* overheat, then your FDB motor will start outgassing which will eventually contaminate the media, producing defects and lost data.

    They say they use "quiet" seek algorithms... A quiet seek = slow in most cases, since you get quieter by just not accelerating the heads quite so hard.

    Like the others, I'll believe it when I don't hear it...

    --
    More data, damnit!
  93. Re:Solid state by shepd · · Score: 1

    >there is pretty much nil difference between HDs now and 40 years ago!

    I dunno, I'd say the difference between rectangular and cylindrical counts as a major change...

    That and the size -- modern hard drives are much smaller than their older cousins. Try comparing an IBM microdrive to a washing machine sized drive from the 70's.

    CPUs haven't changed all that much since the 70's either, if you look at them the same way you're looking at hard drives. Still silicon, still encased in ceramic (or plastic). :-)

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  94. Can't hear it? by kruczkowski · · Score: 4

    Some of you clam that you want to hear the drive spinning.

    Why don't you connect the PC speaker the to HD LED? And if you want to be realy cool, install a knob to control the volume.

    --
    hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    1. Re:Can't hear it? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a separate LED panel that I can hang off the monitor.

      If you are stuck on a windoze box, knowing that the HD is overactive when it should not
      can be informative. But if you cannot hear the HD then you would have to check for HD activity,
      and you know what happens when you proactively check on a problem.

      I seriously consider a non-silent HD an important feature on windoze machines.




      --

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  95. I LIKE hearing it!!! by DaRkJaGuaR · · Score: 1

    But i LIKE hearing my drives, its the only way of kooing if your computer is doing somthing somtimes!

    1. Re:I LIKE hearing it!!! by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      It's also the original virus checker... "That's funny, my hard drive hasn't stopped spinning for the last twenty minutes."

      At an old job, we caught one of the few Macintosh viruses. The only thing it seemed to do was click the Hard Drive on and off every 10 seconds or so.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    2. Re:I LIKE hearing it!!! by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      Exactly, Otherwise how will we know when General Failure will try to format the HD, again!!!

      Remember, when you are downloading MP3's, you are downloading communism!!!

      --
      badness 10000
  96. No regrets here by electricmonk · · Score: 3
    I'm just now assembling the parts for a new computer myself, and I opted to go with some Seagate Ultra160 18XL drives. Even if they are technically "slower" than this new ATA drive, I am still happy I bought them instead. Why? For several reasons:

    Seagate makes notoriously crappy ATA drives. Their SCSI line may be great, but they have never made a name for themselves in the ATA industry.

    When was the last time you saw someone attaching more than 2 devices to an ATA channel? That's right, never. If you want to make a RAID array, you have to get at least two channels, and that's just for the hard drives!

    ATA/100 just ain't that fast when compared to the awesome power of Ultra160 SCSI.

    The most important reason: This product wasn't even out when I bought my storage system.

    However, it's good to see that this kind of technology exists in the market, and perhaps it will produce a trickle-down effect so that we will see cheaper drives equipped with this technology available to a wider audience.

    --
    < )
    ( \
    X

    --
    Friends don't let friends use multiple inheritance.
    1. Re:No regrets here by nekid_singularity · · Score: 1

      If the data was that important why didn't you just use a data recovery company?

      --
      Numbers 31:17,18 Now kill all the boys. And kill every woman who has slept with a man,but save for yourselves every virg
    2. Re:No regrets here by mrm677 · · Score: 1

      I agree. ATA drives by Seagate suck. I bought one thinking that it would be a reliable drive. I put all of my important stuff on it...every document I ever wrote in the last 5 years. At the time, I didn't have a backup mechanism because I was a poor college student. The drive crashed in 6 months. Meanwhile, my trusty Samsung has been spinning away for 5 years now. I realize there are always exceptions...but come on! I paid good money for that drive and I lost everything.

    3. Re:No regrets here by mrm677 · · Score: 1

      I got an estimate. It would cost me $1200. If you know of anybody who does this for say, $300, then let me know.

  97. Re:Silence is nullified... by SnapShot · · Score: 1

    My next desk is gonna have a kind of mini-cupboard, into which I put the tower. open to the back for ventilation, and with an isolated door in the front so to dam the noise.

    Someday I'm going to be a good enough woodworker (or rich enough to hire a good woodworker) to make a desk like that. Don't forget the second cupboard to hold the laser printer...

    --
    Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
  98. Seagate being quiet.... ironic by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2


    As an owner of three old Seagate drives (150, 250, 520 Mb anyone ;-) I've always considered Seagate to make the nosiesest drives in the world. I keep my file server in the attic, in a large box - and I can still hear it whirring.

    Some people say they like to hear the noise, it reminds them that it's still working. That's like saying they like channel logos to remind them what channel there watching. There are lovely little lights on the front of your box. They ain't just pritty ya know :-)

    1. Re:Seagate being quiet.... ironic by Microsift · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that's irony, most people refer to that as improvement!

      --
      My other sig is extremely clever...
  99. Re:silent drives and stiction by RadioTV · · Score: 1

    Stiction is a static buildup that causes the heads to stick to the drive platters. Since the motors in the drives aren't very powerful, the disk wont spin. Usually you can break the disks free by removing the drive, holding it level and rotating it back and forth along the axes of the spindle. I haven't seen a drive do this in several years.

    --
    I have great faith in fools - self confidence my friends call it. - Edgar Allan Poe
  100. Re:Now all we need... by andyh1978 · · Score: 2
    Is a lownoise 300w powersupply + fan to use with a Athlon thunderbird, and were rolling..
    Quiet PC do 250W and 300W quiet power supplies. The 300W is AMD approved.
  101. Bels by mp3car · · Score: 1

    Do they say how many bels it emmits while the head crashes into the platter destroying all my porn and haxor'd documents?

  102. What about CPRM??? by firewort · · Score: 2

    What about CPRM?

    with the coming t13 / CPRM standards, I refuse to buy new harddrives. I simply do not want anyone placing copy controls in the firmware of my hard disk.

    A host is a host from coast to coast, but no one uses a host that's close

    --

  103. i don't knhttp://www.dailymail.com/news/Opinion/ow by hyperstation · · Score: 1
    but the thought of my hard drive not happily clicking away is very unsettling. will we still be able to get shiny new drives that make noise?

    --

  104. Re:best of both worlds by killerbobjr · · Score: 1

    You CAN put higher wattage drives in a SilentDrive box. You just have to make sure the heat is adequately dissipated. I have two SCSI drives in SilentDrive enclosures, one 7200 dissipating about 7 watts at idle, and one 10K dissipating 10 watts at idle. Each drive enclosure is solidly mounted to the computer case to increase the effective surface area of the heat plates, and a 12V fan wired for 7V operation blows outside air directly over the plates. Everything stays cool to the touch, and quiet too!

  105. Caveats of Fluid Bearings by WildBill1941 · · Score: 1
    Having worked in the disk industry for a while, and been involved with a company that made hard disk testing equipment, I know a bit about spindles and bearings. I haven't fooled with a Fluid Bearing (Hydrodynamic) in a while, but this is what I remember:

    A Fluid Bearing Spindle has the following positive characteristics, amongst others:

    It's quiet.

    It's smooth (very low non-repetitive runout, low rumble, ideal for low flying height heads).
    It also has the following negative characteristics:

    Unidirectional (you can't run it backwards, or it self-destructs, but who cares for a drive).

    Sensitive to orientation (The drive probably won't run upside down, or will suffer severe loss of MTBF if run upside down).

    Generates more heat and has more drag than ball bearings. This will heat up the case and put more load on the power supply.

    Requires very tight operating tolerances - if a part is a touch out of spec (as little as 50-100 millionths of an inch) it can toast the spindle.

    Just FYI if you decide to go with this drive. I remember some years ago Seagate made some prototypes with this technology, they had zero time between failures. The company I used to work for also experimented with this technology, and every product was a flop. Your mileage may vary.

    1. Re:Caveats of Fluid Bearings by cREW+oNE · · Score: 1

      "Years ago" is probably the keyword here.

      I mean, do you REALLY think a company out there sells (and supports, etc) a product that is 1) likely to COST them money in returns, failures and 2) pisses off their users?

      A little more faith in one of the leading drive manufacturers would be in place, IMHO :)

      --

      +++ATH0

  106. If a drive crashes in the forest , by dynoman7 · · Score: 1

    does it make a bel?


    If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail.

    --
    Blarf.
  107. Re:Silent computer by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    If you can't hear it, you probably have a hearing deficiency.

  108. Re:Now all we need is quiet neighbors by jhein · · Score: 1

    The fans, HDDs, etc. don't bother me.

    BUT, the cubicle neighbors who refuse to turn off key-clicks, talk(more like shout) on the phone all day, leave their ringer up so high ("It lets me hear it when i'm in xxx's office") so that it startles you when in deep thought, and of course in flu season: the snorting, sniffing, blowing, talking just to hear yourself or gain sympathy instead of going home (Trying to pass it on to everyone at work?)

    That really bugs me. Loud HDDs can be tuned out, rude co-workers cannot.

  109. What about... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Headcrashes? Is that going to still give some sound? Ah. The lovely click clack of a damaged harddrive is like sweet music to my ears.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  110. Re:Solid state by egjertse · · Score: 2
    I'm not denying there's been developments with regards to size and transfer rates. However, as I said, we're still using spinning disks.

    I guess you could compare it to the automobile industry - which has stagnated in much the same sense (if not for the same reasons). While modern cars give more mileage pr. gallon than cars 20-30 years ago, it's still essentially the same old tech (petroleum products that go "bang"...) - despite the presence of newer, more economical and more environmentally friendly alternatives.

    I think we need a radical shift in R&D focus - towards physically smaller, higher capacity drives with a much higher stability and fault tolerance. My opinion is that moving away from the existing hard-drive technology is necessary to accomplish that.

    Solid state drives need not necessarily be the end-all-be-all. But it's a good path to explore.

    Hope that clears it up a bit?

  111. Solid state by egjertse · · Score: 4
    Why the tinkering with old technology? With the development that the rest of the computer industry undergoes (ref. Moores Law) - why has the development in the HD department been in a state of virtual stand-still? Except for speed and size (and now noise level) there is pretty much nil difference between HDs now and 40 years ago!

    I mean, come on!! It's 2001, and computers still have moving parts? Why not ditch this ancient tech and pour some more $$ into developing affordable solid-state disks?

    1. Re:Solid state by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      There are still some notorious problems with solid state memory.

      1- It's expensive, and the price per MB difference must be like x500.

      2- Solid State memory is essentially Flash memory, and is not that easy to manufacture and has a very limited lifecycle (about 1000 writes or something.) EEPROM has a longer lifecycle, but is vastly more expensive.

      Some say solid state is catching up, but I find it hard to call 256MB of Flash at the same price of an 80gig harddrive "catching up".

      Solid state has its uses, but it won't replace hard drives anytime soon.

    2. Re:Solid state by Halcyon-X · · Score: 1
      I mean, come on!! It's 2001, and computers still have moving parts?

      Well, I think that we won't be getting rid of HSFs any time soon, and it seems to apply to Moore's Law as well. Fans need to be twice as powerful with every new CPU generation, unfortunately.

      I have a Super Orb on my Athlon 1.2GHz (2x5500RPM fans, though my monitor shows one 6000RPM and one 5500RPM), in an air conditioned room (about 68F), and my CPU idles at 45C, with an ambient case temp of 25C, even though I'm not overclocking, and the CPU is using 1.6V Core (normal is 1.75 for an Athlon 1.2GHz), 3.3V VIO. (Sorry, but my A/C shows Farenheit, and my monitor shows Celcius).

      There's got to be a way to cool these damn things down, without being so noisy! At this rate, I don't care how loud my hard drive is (60GB Quantum Fireball AS, pretty quiet actually), I won't be able to hear it over the fscking fans in my case!

      --

      .sig: Open Source, Open Mind

    3. Re:Solid state by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? With the right timing you can get 80 gigs of prime memory for $120 + shipping.
      ~

    4. Re:Solid state by vla1den · · Score: 1

      Except for speed and size (and now noise level) there is pretty much nil difference between HDs now and 40 years ago!

      You forget about the price. In the last 10 years price for hard drive media dropped 1000 times. May be this is the answer to your question: Why the tinkering with old technology?


    5. Re:Solid state by osgeek · · Score: 2

      why has the development in the HD department been in a state of virtual stand-still?

      While you may be thinking that spinning platters are all the same, the technological advances used to eek out more and more bits per area have been astounding.

      I think that storage technology researchers in this field should be given a lot of credit for what they've accomplished.

      Maybe, instead of railing against them, you can lead us into the new solid-state technology revolution. It's simple, right?

    6. Re:Solid state by Liquid-Gecka · · Score: 4

      Flash is still EXTREEMLY expensive. Companies like Micron and Samsung are always looks for ways to drop the cost of solid state drives. Currently I have only seen a 4.3G solid state drive as the largest (Sorry.. no link at the moment) and, while it was fast, it was also extreemly expensive. (In the several thousand range.) It may have been quiet, but it sucked power at a far greater rate than any spinning media drive. Solid state sounds good on paper, and for some tasks it is good, but you have to think of this as a one or the other setup..

      Spinning Media vs Solid State
      Cheap vs Expensive (Pretty much no exceptions, no matter what you do silicon wafers are far more expensive than disks)
      Large vs Small (Solid state is still very restricted by speeds/sizes compaired to spinning media)
      Slow vs. Fast (With the right interface, if they both use IDE it really won't help that much)
      Small vs. Large power use (Even in a idle state flash sucks far more current than a motor. 11ma by 128 parts is 1.408a in its IDLE state)
      Loud vs. Quiet (Solid state is VERY quiet.. =)

      So, pick two or three areas that you are concerned with. If you want all the performance of a flash drive, with the cost of a spinning media drive you won't get a very large drive. Or if you want a large drive that is cheap, you won't get a quiet and fast drive.

      You know how the saying goes.. Good, Cheap, Fast... Pick two.

    7. Re:Solid state by Tech187 · · Score: 1
      Except for speed and size (and now noise level) there is pretty much nil difference between HDs now and 40 years ago!

      Don't tell that to old timers like my father who programmed the IBM 650 in the late 1950s. Back then the only input to a machine was a card reader, the only output to a machine was a card punch, and a biggish machine had a 5000 byte drum memory (predecessor of 'disk' memory). To run jobs on such a storage starved machine one had to:

      Read in the deck containing the assembler program.

      Run the loaded assembler program

      Read in the deck containing your source code

      The Assembler would punch up a stack of 'object' cards

      Read in your stack of object cards (wiping out the Assembler program that was still in memory)

      Your program would punch it's output on another stack of cards

      Take the stack of output cards to another machine which would print the data on each card to a line of paper

      A quantitative change occured when disk/drum space became cheaper. The whole way the system is used has changed radically without the 'basic-machine physics' level of operation changing much.

    8. Re:Solid state by D+Anderson+n'Swaart · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that with a 32-bit address bus, your CPU will only be able to use a maximum of 4 GB (4096 MB) of RAM, and I haven't personally seen any mobos that can manage that (although I know you can get them.) Of course, I presume that you are thinking of setting up some kind of specialised expansion board (that could even use a normal IDE connector) that you could stick your dimms in, but I expect that just the board would cost you a fair tad. A nice idea though...just thought I'd mention the RAM limit thing.

    9. Re:Solid state by pa-guy · · Score: 1
      EEPROM has a longer lifecycle, but is vastly more expensive.

      EEPROM is also so slow as to be unusable as mass storage.

    10. Re:Solid state by yknott · · Score: 1

      The reason HD's haven't been making big jumps is because HD manufacturers seem to have hit a brick wall when it comes to drive density. Currently most hard drives hold 20 gb/ platter. This seems to the the maximum for the type of motor and the type of read write head (i.e. GMR) IBM within the past month or so has developed a new technology, using what they call "pixie dust". Basically they dope the platter with ruthenium. Only about three atoms thick between the magnetic coatings. This addresses the problem of a so-called "superparamagnetic effect," in which data gets lost when the magnetic regions of a disk get too small. With the new design, hard-disk drives will be able to hold up to 100 billion bits of data per square inch. As density goes up, seek times goes down, and transfer speeds should go up.

  112. Quieter Computers - BAH! by kikta · · Score: 2

    No shit! I want to have my computer loud as hell! If I could add side pipes & have them blow fucking fire like Gone In 60 Seconds, I would! I have a totally obnoxious tower with fans out the ass just to pester the shit out of my fat-ass roomates. Quieter Computers - BAH!

    Of course this is still very cool, don't get me wrong... ;-)

  113. Bels or deciBels? by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

    2.5 Bels?! You've got to be kidding! That's 250 decibels - louder than a jet engine, and certainly above the pain AND I beleive even above the death threshold.

    --
    Paul Anderson
    "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    1. Re:Bels or deciBels? by driftingwalrus · · Score: 1

      Aren't there laws against public exposure of one's stupidity?

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    2. Re:Bels or deciBels? by FrankSinatra · · Score: 1

      What are you, retarded? 2.5 bels is one-quarter of a decibel. Learn your prefixes then come back and post.

  114. Fastest Drive Yet? You're Shitting me! by dj+dko · · Score: 1

    Hmm... seems to me that my Seagate Ultra160 15,000RPM x15 is a little faster than this 7200PRM IDE heathen! Methinks it's time to take back the night! Common Seagate, more SCSI goodness!

    --
    Tom: (singing) Pork chops, cream puffs, candy bars... Crow: (singing) Meat sauce, Cheetos, Mallomars...
  115. In the search for the quiet computer... by chrisatslashdot · · Score: 1

    Why not submerge a computer in a non-electrolytic liquid. A side-effect would be that you now have a good heat sink. Surely problems like oxidation and corrosion could be successfully dealt with .

    --


    Simple people talk of people, better people talk of events, great people talk of ideas.
  116. Re:Rotation Noise and Ear Fatigue by tmark · · Score: 1
    the high RPM drives are more fatiguing/damaging to the ears because they emit a high-pitched whine from the

    Are you serious ? The noise from your 3 drives is causing you hearing damage??? How close are you to the drive ? Given that the noise from even the loudest drives I have ever been around is certainly far less than that of normal conversation, I would think the only way they could damage your ear is if you removed the casing, honed the edge of a platter to be razor sharp, and cut your ear off. Or maybe you could do it if you cut off the leads from the cables, exposed the wires at the end, then jabbed them so far in your ear canal as to rupture the tympanic membrane.

  117. Re:TO CLEAR THINGS UP ON THE UNITS USED by tmark · · Score: 1
    for those of you who dont remember high school physics, a 2 bel hard drive is very quiet.

    I think I skipped the class where we learned about exaclty how quiet 2 bel hard drives are.

  118. Rotation Noise and Ear Fatigue by lwagner · · Score: 2
    People demand silent power supplies and quiet fans... yet they also want the 7200, 10000, and 15000RPM drives. These are much louder and uncomfortable in many cases than the "whoosh" of a fan farm.

    I have two 10000RPM drives and a 15000RPM drive in my server. If I had to do it over again, I would use 3 5400RPM drives.

    For those who don't know, the high RPM drives are more fatiguing/damaging to the ears because they emit a high-pitched whine from the spindle mechanism... if you've ever been outside an airplane when it's on the ground and has its engines powered up (though not throttled), it's that kind of whine.

    It gets so obnoxious hearing the "whining" of the drives go in and out of sync that I wear hearing protection when I can. Hearing protection looks strange, but it also reduces the "numbness" caused on the ears after a long day of work next to the drives.

    1. Re:Rotation Noise and Ear Fatigue by yknott · · Score: 1

      Would you really use a 5400 RPM drive? Sure the noise is alot less, but your performance suffers a great deal. your seek time goes to hell too. The whole reason people buy 15k RPM drives is becuase they fast as hell.When your disk spins faster you can pick up the data faster. If you miss a spot, the disk spins back around faster to get back to that spot.

  119. Re:silent drives and stiction by ipinkus · · Score: 1

    I'd imagine most people trying to detect or repair this sort of thing have their cases off and their fingers on the drive to detect vibrations. Working at a data recovery firm we would take the drives out of the towers and attach them via some custom long cables to allow for detecting repairing these sorts of things. These drives really shouldn't make work any tougher.

  120. Re:Anand is an idiot by jarodkf · · Score: 1

    It's not Anand, Its just a direct copy of Seagate's own news release. http://www.seagate.com/cda/newsinfo/newsroom/relea ses/article/0,1247,1156,00.html

  121. It may be patented... by dopplex · · Score: 1

    A relative of mine is a lawyer for someone who is involved in a lawsuit (Along with someone at MIT) for patent infringement on noise reducing technology against Seagate and Compaq (And possibly some others I am not aware of.) His client was apparantly to have been involved with selling the technology, which was developed at MIT. I am not sure if it is the same technology in question here, (My relative is covering a matrimonial dispute, and not this! And to be honest, I don't really know the details) but if it is it makes me wonder whether the technology will see the light, (under Seagate auspices at least)
    -Daniel

    --
    "You can take our lives, but you can never take our Flerbage!!!!"
  122. Fan of fans by ScottBob · · Score: 1
    I've had one small fan after another running in my room since the good ole days when computers were silent. Usually they were those el-cheapo air "purifiers" that used a foam filter and scented silica gel, but occasionally I've used fans salvaged from everything from refrigerators and microwave ovens to copy machines. I've even made my own fans by jamming toy airplane propellers onto record player motors. As I graduated from the VIC-20 to the C-64 to the Amiga 500, I always turned those nice, silent computers off at night and turned on some old salvaged fan to lull me to sleep. But that was in the days when I was too cheap to go to K-Mart and buy a real fan (i.e. a box fan or an oscillating fan, only because I blew every cent I made mowing yards and doing other teenage jobs on computers and software).

    But now I have my big computer with the two cooling fans, hard disk that sounds like a table saw and CD-ROM that sounds like a DC-10 engine running at taxi speed. I turn all that off at night and turn on yet another salvaged air purifier fan.

  123. How much cooler are they? by daniel_isaacs · · Score: 1
    As we've stated a few times already in this thread, Fans are the real source of noise. In Servers especially, cooling 3-5 10K drives requires 3 dedicated fans (in a 2U server). We all know that 'Cuda's get hot. Damn hot. What will this new "fluid" process do to reduce the heat generated by previous drives?

    Frankly, I can manage with earplugs in the Data Center. Make those SCSI drives cooler, and make me happy.

    --
    - Dan I.
  124. Alert: Marketing department on the rampage. by spellcheckur · · Score: 1
    Thermally conductive cold plates transfer the heat generated by the hard drive inside SilentDrive's enclosure to the ambient air within the PC chassis.

    Couldn't they just say "heat sink" ?

    I think this is what happens when you hire buzzword enabled language proficients into your external-company-image division as media notification generators. ...er, I'm sorry, that should be "non technical PR people."

  125. Old news.... by gr8fulnded · · Score: 2

    I've had absolutely silent hard drives for the past 18 months. Four different drives, not a sound from any of them. Oh...wait... thats cause I lost my hearing 18 months ago :)

  126. Re:Owen Hart by matrix29 · · Score: 1

    Even worse, he got bonked on one of the ring corners. That's one for the photo album to traumatize the kiddies with later.

    Notable quoteables:
    "Shawn Gaitan, 24, who brought his 7-year-old nephew to the event, said: "I think it's really messed up that they kept on with the show. They could at least told us what was going on. We worry just like the other people worry."

    Gaitan said he saw Owen flying through the air; his head hit a turnbuckle and snapped back."

    And "The World Wrestling Federation announced to its stock holders in a press release today that its second quarter earnings will be affected by a $7 million charge related to settling the wrongful death lawsuit filed by Owen Hart's family"

    Google search [ "Owen Hart" death ]

    http://www.denizine.com/1999/mactavish/052799HAR T. htm

    http://www.tennessean.com/sii/99/05/24/hart24.sh tm l

    --
    "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  127. Re:Home web servers with ADSL by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

    As ADSL is becoming available for ordinary users the need for quite web servers may increase. I have an ADSL from home but I really haven't made a web-site at the IP address because I wouldn't like the noise in my home... especially when I'm going to sleep. When I turn off the computer late at night (morning?) and go to bed, I really like the quietness.

    Call me crazy, but I just keep my PCs in a room other than the bedroom. I have 2 servers and 2 workstations runnnig 24/7 at my house (one of them is a web server) and I never hear a peep out of them when I sleep (unless I leave the speakers on and someone IMs me in the middle of the night). Problem solved.

    Say "NO!" to tax money for religious groups.

  128. best of both worlds by codebunny · · Score: 1

    So why not take one of these and then put it in a SilentDrive box?

    btw, I've got a low noise Quantum (4400rpm, 2.5-3 bels or therabouts) in one of these and it's good, but not great. i.e. I can still hear it as it gets towards night-time. During the day though with normal room levels of noise it's 'silent'.

    also, SilentDrive is available from quietpc.com for UK people.

    1. Re:best of both worlds by codebunny · · Score: 1

      doh! because it's a 7200rpm drive.

      Mind you, the reason you can't put fast drives in those boxes is due to the extra heat they produce. Sound & heat are kinda related with drives so reducing one may reduce the other, which would let you use the SilentDrive box.

      Also, quietpc.com have used 7200rpm drives in a SilentDrive box anyway (IBM).

  129. 7V by thopo · · Score: 1

    if you're a man you will just mod your fans from 12V to 7V and you will barely hear them. once you've done it there is no way to go back to 12V. works get more pleasant and productive, A LOT.

    --
    keep it simple.
    1. Re:7V by brinkmann · · Score: 1

      hmm, then the next step would be to mod my drives down from 12V to 7V ...err... that didn't work
      (don't try this at home, kids)

  130. Fanless case - could someone in Korea checkitout? by skilbeck · · Score: 1

    http://www.cnssystem.com/product1_e.html This looks like the thing for a quiet PC - is anyone in Korea willing to check it out and post a review?

  131. Silence is nullified... by Maxlor · · Score: 2

    You know, this sounds great. A drive with "fluid dynamic bearing". I dunno, but this sounds like it might be quiter, but emits more heat in exchange. Which is a problem: I currently have two IBM Deskstar 75GXP that are quite silent, however they easily get hot enough to make cook some egg 'n bacon breakfast on them. So what good is a HD that is silent, but gets so hot you need an aditional fan to keep the air inside the case cool? On another note, I, like some other folks who posted above, like the sounds the HD's produce. You get some more information about what your computer is doing, plus, the sound the HD's produce (a low clicking and chirping... well, maybe not chirping. The seeking sound, you know) is not unpleasant, quite the opposite indeed. Unlike the humming of fans, which I consider to be very annoying. as for those 69MB transfer rate: Thats burst transfer rate, and you're certainly not going to get it when copying 60MB of MP3's from that drive... (plus, do you have a device handy thats able to write at that speed?). My next desk is gonna have a kind of mini-cupboard, into which I put the tower. open to the back for ventilation, and with an isolated door in the front so to dam the noise.

    1. Re:Silence is nullified... by cREW+oNE · · Score: 1
      (plus, do you have a device handy thats able to write at that speed?)

      Try that 512Mb of DDR SDRAM that's in your box :)

      --

      +++ATH0

  132. Call my crazy but... by Tviokh · · Score: 1

    ...I LIKE all the misc. noises my computer makes.
    I'd miss the grinding(or squeaking, as the 13 year old 286 does), the whirring, the spinning, and the general drone.
    The only time my computer is silent is when power's out, hardware is being added, or it's not feeling well.

    The noises let me know it's healthy :)

    --
    http://pebkac.net
  133. silent drives and stiction by Astrorunner · · Score: 1
    Just an observation.

    Silent drives will certainly make it harder to tell if your drive has stiction. Since you can't hear it, you can't just listen to it and hear the drive motor spin up to speed or fail.

  134. Re:Now all we need... by dmouritsendk · · Score: 1

    Well , I need to watch the budget. The AMD chips help out in doing so :o)

  135. Now all we need... by dmouritsendk · · Score: 2

    Is a lownoise 300w powersupply + fan to use with a Athlon thunderbird, and were rolling..

    1. Re:Now all we need... by Tech187 · · Score: 1

      Heh.

      I knew somebody with a big noisy Athlon would have to add a comment like this. Apple partisans used to make fun of us Intel chip users for the excessive power consumption of the original Pentium chips. It's kind of amusing that there's a new low man in the pecking order with the Athlon.

  136. Fujitsu has had FDB for years by Canonymous+Howard · · Score: 2

    Fujitsu has had Fluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB) technology for years. Just look for a Fujistsu drive whose model number ends with -A.

    And yes, they're really quiet. Quieter than a regular drive with a SilentDrive kit. It's gotten so that I won't buy anything else anymore.

    They're not totally silent though- remember that 2.4 bels is 24 decibels (a lot of people don't make the connection), and is undeniably audible. It's just really quiet. You generally have to listen for it to notice it.

  137. Re:Solid state (addendum) by Tech187 · · Score: 1

    typo in above. I meant to say a qualitative change occured.

  138. Silent drives?! by The_Weevil · · Score: 1

    this may sound weird, but I like to be able to hear my HD working. While being quiet is a nice thing to show off to your mates ("look it doesnt make any noise, wowww!") it isnt practical in my opinion. My drive rattling is the only way i know that Windows hasnt died. Increased rattling means I should defrag etc etc. With a drive I cant hear I'd have to look at a damn LED all the time =) Marvelous accheivement though, but surely we should have moved on from magnetic discs by now?

    --
    ghaa.
  139. Old Man Rant by JBowz15 · · Score: 1

    You kids have it too easy these days... In my we didn't have silent hard drives. In fact we didn't have computers. We had to sit there and make our own thrashing sounds if we wanted to simulate swapping. And we liked it! Bah!

  140. Noise? by night_flyer · · Score: 1
    maybe Im just deaf, but I have three computers in a 8x10 room... a 166, a 450 and 866... and I dont hear a peep outta any of then except for the 866's hd on occasion (usually while processing a large .wav file)... my ceiling fan makes more noise that all three combined...

    _______________________

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  141. Home web servers with ADSL by Saggi · · Score: 1

    As ADSL is becoming available for ordinary users the need for quite web servers may increase. I have an ADSL from home but I really haven't made a web-site at the IP address because I wouldn't like the noise in my home... especially when I'm going to sleep. When I turn off the computer late at night (morning?) and go to bed, I really like the quietness.

    If I'm not the only one who fell that way, there will be a market. And an interesting one as well. I would expect the Internet to become even more interesting when we all get our home web-sites. I'm not talking about static web-pages, you can host at any web hotel, but really fancy-computer-internet-servers running weird services, games and stuff we would love to see.

    At least that what I would put out there... if I could get a silent server.

    Saggi

    --
    -:) Oh no - not again.
    www.rednebula.com
  142. Good idea, but... by LyNXeD · · Score: 1

    Couldn't this be a problem? Sure, I'd love to have one in my Linux boxen (I pretty much use Linux all the time.) But, think about all those 'doze users still left out there... without all the seek racket, how will they know if their box is still alive or not???

    That's one thing I appreciate about the noise, I can tell if the 98 box is still alive or not.... :P

    (I can see it now... people constantly resetting their XP boxen because they think it's hung, due to the fact that no racket is taking place... now's a good time to get OUT of tech support.)

  143. Re:Damn yankee by yknott · · Score: 1

    oopsy my bad. I'm sorry my mistake. It's friday. Gimmi a break

  144. Many vendors make quieter drives by GrumpyOldManager · · Score: 1

    Many vendors have drives designed for use in radio and television studios. These drives are quieter than the standard models, have pretty good performance, and don't require enclosing them in a box (unless you want to). An example is the Quantum lct20.

  145. Inside Scoop by FrankSinatra · · Score: 1

    I was one of the engineers that worked on this project, and while I can't get into what we did with it (as our competitors will find out as soon as the reverse engineer them), the drive is incredible. It really is silent, running at under 2.5 bels (not decibels). On top of that is the fact that the silence belies the speed at which it operates. As a member of the Barracuda family, it is fast enough to stream eight movies simultaneously, in DVD quality, without dropping a frame. And no, there is no heat problem, because if there was, it would never have gotten out the door.