Slashdot Mirror


Move Over Lego, Enter Atollo

FortKnox writes: "Through the blessed portal memepool, I stumbled across the new arcitecture toy, Atollo. These new building toys can build any type of shape with only two pieces. The two pieces can be connected in many different ways allowing both rigid and flexible connections. " MMmm. Toys. Anyone else remember Construx? I loved those things too.

288 comments

  1. Connex? by anotherone · · Score: 1

    Connex? No way... it's all about the tinkertoys.
    aw yeah...

    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
    1. Re:Connex? by MadCow42 · · Score: 1

      How about Mechano? THAT was cool stuff!

      MadCow

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    2. Re:Connex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about popsicle sticks and some glue?
      now that was some fun stuff..

      almost as fun as smashing a cop car. i dont like cops, they're racist and they're opressive. but then agian they work for a capitalist system. what we need is no one telling us what we cant do and what we have to do.
      why do people commite crime? because some people dont have enough to survive.

    3. Re:Connex? by IAmSancho · · Score: 1

      He said "Construx." Construx are similar to Connex in that they have clips rather than the Lego-like pegs. However, as cool as Construx are, they are very weak. They are prone to breaking because the beam cross sections are squares with one edge missing. It's also difficult to make anything with Construx that involves anything other than right-angles.

      --
      -------------------------

      Stupid people suck.

    4. Re:Connex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhh yes.... Connex... now that is the ultimate low tech toy

      ac

    5. Re:Connex? by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

      OH so sorry, that was only if you used the blue knots. The green knots were at 45 degree angles.... Amateur :)

    6. Re:Connex? by emogirl · · Score: 1

      Yeah and there were orange knots and you could pull a string through them to let other pieces hang off them. And there were also almost quarter-circle pieces so you weren't limited to right angles. Construx were pretty cool, but since all the pieces were so big, you needed a lot of pieces to do anything. I prefered lego myself. Speaking of which, the new Lego Bionic series rocks!

    7. Re:Connex? by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      That's weird, I had quite the collection of Construx during my childhood and never saw a green piece. Maybe 7 or 8 different sets. There were, however, black pieces that had just 3 stable sides and a 4th connector on a rotating hinge so you could get basically any angle you wanted or have drawbridges and the like...

  2. any cool automation stuff with it? by EQ · · Score: 1

    Until then, Legos still rule the roost

    --
    Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
    1. Re:any cool automation stuff with it? by justletmeinnow · · Score: 0

      hehe, they've got Dinosaur Instructions Lego still rules...

      --
      Just because I AM paranoid doesn't mean they're NOT out to get me.
  3. Yes but.... by Kaypro · · Score: 1

    Can it compete with Mindstorm?

    (Can't tell....site slashdotted....must refresh till wee hours of night.....mmmmmm.....fresh dognuts.....)

    1. Re:Yes but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      mmmmmm.....fresh dognuts


      Oh, are you really interested in canine reproductive organs?

    2. Re:Yes but.... by Kaypro · · Score: 1

      wow....thats embarrasing.... I meant donuts...gotta get some sleep....

    3. Re:Yes but.... by 10+Speed · · Score: 1

      thanks for the laugh....

    4. Re:Yes but.... by Kaypro · · Score: 1



      It was a simple fat fingered mistype...no biggy...

    5. Re:Yes but.... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2
      Can it compete with Mindstorm?

      It doesn't have to. Take a look at this page of their website. It will connect to "leading brands." In other words, LEGO. So, you buy a Mindstorm kit, and you fasten the Atollo Brokits onto it to make even cooler stuff. It looks like they can ride on LEGO's back.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  4. Construx? by ryanwright · · Score: 2

    Anyone else remember Construx?

    Somewhere, probably still in my parent's attic, I have a huge box full of Construx. When I was a kid I made little carts and buggies, hooked them to my Chihuahua, and made him pull them around the house. Great fun, that Chihuahua was...

    --
    -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    1. Re:construx? by anotherone · · Score: 1

      was it Erector set?

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    2. Re:Construx? by HerrNewton · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well... at least this didn't happen, right?

      --

      ----
      Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
    3. Re:construx? by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

      Construx, indeed, rocked. My parents too have a big heap of them in a box in their attic. However:


      I remember one that actually had screws and metal bars that you could bolt together in all different shapes and sizes, and motors too, but I can't remember the name of it.


      "Erector"? I can't believe that you'd forget the name of the construction-type toy that made me giggle most... :) I hated that thing, because it took forever to thread all the nutsonot the screws. If they'd used some kind of expanding fastener (like hollow-wall anchors, perhaps) so I dind'thave to thread and unthread stuff or hold a screwdriver/wrench/2+ parts with only 2 hands, I'd have liked them almost as much as construx. As it was, though, construx rocked.

    4. Re:construx? by redhog · · Score: 1

      If it's what I think, it's Mechano (or something, in swedish, it's Mekano anyway) - all sorts of thin metal bars and sticks and wheels. You could easily hook motors from old casett-recorders to it, too. Oh those times!

      --
      --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    5. Re:Construx? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      G~d I loved those things. They went out of business a while ago and I've been dying to buy more of them. To bad nobody knows what I'm talking about nor do they know where to find/buy them. If anybody wants to sell theirs to me please PLEASE let me know askjosh@juno.com. I remember having the ones with lights and motors. I had boats, cars a so much more. I would build things and then put them on my dresser. My mother would have to come in a take them apart because I never wanted to destroy my contraptions. Ah yes the good old days of Construx

    6. Re:construx? by Mtgman · · Score: 2

      Construx beat Robotix? You're out of your fscking gourd! I had all of the generation 1 Robotix sets when I was a kid, those things were serously tough! I had a small screwdriver(from a eyeglass repair kit) that I kept with them to pry the damn things apart with. Once you put something together out of these, man, it stayed together. The motors had more torque than many small cars today, but the deciding factor would have to be "Argus's Jaws" This was a mock-up dinosaur head which could hold a motor and would open and close it's jaws on things. Man, this thing had some powerful chompers, I still have scars!

      Come on, anyone else remeber the R-2000(Argus) Robotix set? Anyone else feel that bite?

      Steven

      --
      -- I have marked myself unwilling to moderate-- I don't have other accounts to artificially inflate the karma of
    7. Re:construx? by Squid · · Score: 2

      I had the R-2000, but never let it bite me. I let it bite down crooked on a GIJoe once, damn thing had so much torque that, with the left and right sides of the jaw not biting evenly, it fucking pried itself off the motor and its jaw went flying. It wasn't broken, amazingly. Which kinda hinted to me that if I ever got my hand caught in there, a) the motor would not stop until it had torqued the jaws apart, and b) the plastic not break until it had gone through my hand. So I treated it with a bit more care after that. :-)

    8. Re:construx? by wolf- · · Score: 1

      Erector pieces are still nice for adding that 7th ide drives to your 6 bay system..

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    9. Re:construx? by revscat · · Score: 2

      I would just like to say that that is the funniest thing I have read on /. since this whole WTC thing happened.

      Brah. Vo.

      - Rev.
    10. Re:construx? by NothingCleverToSay · · Score: 1

      ...one that actually had screws and metal bars that you could bolt together in all different shapes and sizes, and motors too, but I can't remember the name of it.

      That would be the erector set. It has a motor, and then attachments to make the motor act as a winch or turn a wheel. very cool stuff.

  5. Eggos by Arkoth · · Score: 1

    Lego my Atollo.

  6. This just in from the Pentagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We will treat Osama Bin Laden to a spookydisharmoniousconflicthellride he will never forget," said Defense Secretary Wesley Willis in a televised press conference this morning. "Rock over London, rock on Kabul. Sprite. Obey your thirst."

    1. Re:This just in from the Pentagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude - that has to be the funniest thing I've ever seen here. Chicken Cow!

  7. you kids have it nice by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    All these new fangled toys.. kids have it nice today. When I was young, I had to build my own computer out of a pile of sand and some scrap metal!

    Anyway it's always nice to see toys whose instructions don't consist of "Attach the Cockpit module to the Wing module. Your new F-16 model is now complete! Enjoy!".

    1. Re:you kids have it nice by anotherone · · Score: 1
      Kids? Heck, I'm 18 years old and I'm gonna check these guys out.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    2. Re:you kids have it nice by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 2

      As he said, kids..

      :)

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    3. Re:you kids have it nice by ncc74656 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      When I was young, I had to build my own computer out of a pile of sand and some scrap metal!
      You had scrap metal? We had to dig ore out of the ground and process it into metal...
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    4. Re:you kids have it nice by stuque · · Score: 1

      When I was young, I had to build my own computer out of a pile of sand and some scrap metal!

      Luxury! When I was a boy, not only did I have to build my computer from a pile of wet sand and twisted scrap metal, I had to perform the CPU's fetch-and-execute cycle by hand.

      But tell it to kids today, and they don't believe you ...

      --
      The more I think about her, the more I believe she's the best pronoun.
    5. Re:you kids have it nice by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      At least you had sand. WE had to make our own sand by grinding down the rocks with our own teeth!

      And we liked it!

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    6. Re:you kids have it nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rocks?! You had ROCKS?!!!

    7. Re:you kids have it nice by dangermouse · · Score: 1
      HA! We didn't have rocks! We had to grind our teeth down with our teeth, and mix the dust with spit to make a modeling compound!


      Mostly, we made false teeth.

    8. Re:you kids have it nice by jmenezes · · Score: 1

      ok, i think this just went from being funny to being pathetic.
      _BUT_....
      In MY day, we had to create the molecular structure for sand and metal before we could go about building our computers...
      Pre-made atoms?
      bah.
      childs stuff

      --
      Stop over-analyzing your analizations
    9. Re:you kids have it nice by dangermouse · · Score: 1
      ok, i think this just went from being funny to being pathetic.


      That's cool, we're not hurting anybody who doesn't read the thread. ;)

    10. Re:you kids have it nice by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      You had ground? Heh! We didn't even have heavy elements until those blasted supernovae created 'em!

    11. Re:you kids have it nice by jorbettis · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but it was 45 seconds that I'm not getting back.

      --

      Jordan Bettis

      ``Wherever you go, there's another stupid sigfile quote.''
    12. Re:you kids have it nice by ralmeida · · Score: 1

      Supernova? We waited a *long* time for the Big Bang, while we were all packed tight in a single geometric point!

      --
      This space left intentionally blank.
    13. Re:you kids have it nice by anotherone · · Score: 1
      :(

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
  8. Slashdotted already? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

    News for Nerds. Stuff you can never get to.

    Maybe I'll get through in a week.

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    1. Re:Slashdotted already? by SilverWeed · · Score: 1

      Not everyone can afford the bandwidth needed to accomodate thousands and thousands of people.

      --
      Remove the Spam to email me.
    2. Re:Slashdotted already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Slashdot can* they should be caching pages like this, so we can see the page and the owner doesn't get slashdotted!

      * well that may not be the case with VA Linux financial situation now, but ignore that fact for all intensive purposes

    3. Re:Slashdotted already? by Zeno_1 · · Score: 1

      Heck, just get it cached on google somehow before posting a link.. the google servers seem to be able to take a beating..

  9. construx? by Telek · · Score: 3

    loved it. What about robotix? That stuff was really damned cool. You could build all sorts of mechanical things that would do stuff. My friends and I used to have wars where we'd build stuff with different brands and then war it out. construx usually always won.

    Man, back to the good old days. Anyone else remember some others? I can't remember them all. I remember one that actually had screws and metal bars that you could bolt together in all different shapes and sizes, and motors too, but I can't remember the name of it.

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  10. I'm not banking.... by cmowire · · Score: 2

    I'm not banking on the massive success of this...

    For one, half of the fun of Legos was all of the different pieces. If you just have two pieces, your creativity is impaired.

    Besides, all of the different pieces keep kids buying more and going back to the store, which bodes well for the future of the company creating said parts.

    *sigh* I miss construx. The difference in construction abilities between construx and legos was cool. You could construct different sorts of items with different attributes in each set. And both had mechanical/motorized/lit up capabilities.

    What happened to them, anyways?

    1. Re:I'm not banking.... by __aaahtg7394 · · Score: 2

      you bring up a good point: all different construction toys have different attributes, lending themselves to different kinds of structures.

      for example, i just bought myself a tub of k-nex. they're neat, and you can do weird things with them you couldn't with lego (they come with _gears_! gears, i say!), nor as well with construx. But they have little to no inherent stability. when you build something out of lego, it's pretty damned solid. construx wasn't exactly perfect (the longest bars would torque a little.. i snapped quite a few of them building little throwing devices). but knex just wobble. you have to design structure in, as opposed to just expecting it to be there.

      lego has very few basic blocks. they're all the same basic thing, serving the same basic role. the same goes for construx and knex. sure, they all have neat "accessory" pieces (like the cool little translucent lego pieces, or the pulleys and cockpits of construx, or the gears of knex), but they're still fundamentally basic.

      this toy sounds very similiar, but with more flexbility (haven't seen it yet, /.ed). it sounds like this toy is actually more flexible than lego, and will hopefully spur on more creative designs exercising that flexibility.

      -jbm, just back from a bike ride, so probably not quite lucid.

    2. Re:I'm not banking.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lego had gears for a long time now. Welcome to the wonderful of lego's. Friends said I couldn't build a working aircraft carrier...well sure planes didn't fly but lifts could actually lift 2 planes at once, the bic was nearly 7' long and 3' wide (at widest point).

      We had battleships that could actually fire small blocks about 10' and had great wars (chalk the tip of the shell to mark damage, then those guns weren't allowed to fire again :)

    3. Re:I'm not banking.... by Jagasian · · Score: 2
      If you just have two pieces, your creativity is impaired.

      Yeah, with computers, having only two different types of bits... creativity is impaired. Having 3-bits would be ohhhh sooo much better! I could express so much... err, wait, I can't express anymore with 3-bits than I could with 2-bits. Now wouldn't ya think the same applies to Atollo?
    4. Re:I'm not banking.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My college roommate last year built a working transmission out of lego, an engine (no, not the technichs one, one out of those big 4x2x(the larger height) blocks. He could build just about anything actaully.

    5. Re:I'm not banking.... by mini+me · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm almost certain there is such a thing as a 3 bit computer. 1, 0 and a third state. I can't find anything out there about it so maybe I just totally dreamt the whole thing? Hopefully someone out there knows more about these systems.

      As to what the 3rd bit is for is beyond me?

    6. Re:I'm not banking.... by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Are you thinking of using negative and positive voltage for a 1, and then 0 volts for a 0? Or am I the one on crack?

    7. Re:I'm not banking.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read about something like that in a sci fi book once. I have no idea why a 3-bit computer would be better a normal binary one, though.

    8. Re:I'm not banking.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason why this might not catch on is because with only two types of pieces to use, it'll take *forever* to make a decent sized model. Sort of like building something entirely from Lego 2x1 plates and hinges. Possible, but it'll take a long time and a lot of patience.

      I wouldn't be surprised if Atollo made some wheels of longer "block" pieces in the future. Or a baseplate with a grid sockets on it, to build structures with. Something to interface with Lego bricks would be cool too. :)

    9. Re:I'm not banking.... by kryptik_79 · · Score: 1

      What happened to them, anyways?

      There in my storage room... couple of big boxes anyway.
      Birthdays and christmas, that's all I wanted

      Thanks for the flashback everyone.

    10. Re:I'm not banking.... by armb · · Score: 1

      > 1, 0 and a third state.

      1, 0, and -1, at a logical level. In hardware, +whatever volts, zero volts, and -whatever volts. Each trit (trinary equivalent of bit) position is worth three times the previous one, so the numbers go:

      0
      1
      3 + -1
      3 + 0
      3 + 1
      9 + -3 + -1
      9 + -3 + 0
      9 + -3 + 1
      9 + 0 + -1
      9 + 0 + 0
      9 + 0 + 1
      9 + 3 + -1
      9 + 3 + 1
      27 - 9 - 3 - 1

      So in four trits, you can count up to 27 + 9 + 3 + 1 = 40, compared with 8 + 4 + 2 + 1 = 15 in binary, and all your transistors are still either on or off, without needing intermediate voltage levels. (Of course having the extra sign does make e.g. a four trit adder more complex than a four bit adder).

      --
      rant
    11. Re:I'm not banking.... by armb · · Score: 1

      > 9 + 3 + -1
      9 + 3 + 0
      > 9 + 3 + 1

      --
      rant
    12. Re:I'm not banking.... by blazin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just wondering, but if we get bits from binary digits wouldn't the abbreviation for trinary digits be tits?

      Just a thought...

    13. Re:I'm not banking.... by armb · · Score: 1

      > wouldn't the abbreviation for trinary digits be tits

      It might be more amusing if it was, and would work equally well as "ternary digit" (trinary logic is also known as ternary), but trit is standard usage.
      http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/jargon/html/entry/tri t. html

      --
      rant
    14. Re:I'm not banking.... by blazin · · Score: 1

      That's just too bad since it would mean you could now say "tit" on TV... Oh well...

  11. Spacewarp? by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember Spacewarp? You could build rollercoasters with plastic tubing and ball bearings? Anyone know if you can still buy Spacewarp? I'd love to buy one!

    1. Re:Spacewarp? by dodald · · Score: 1

      :) I still have one set up, I built one of my own design and never had the heart to take it apart.

      Those things kicked ass!

      --
      101010b 2Ah 52o
    2. Re:Spacewarp? by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      Yup. I loved those damn things. I thought about them recently and went looking on eBay. I saw 3 or 4 different sets (all mostly complete) for around $50...

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
    3. Re:Spacewarp? by TheAngryArmadillo · · Score: 1

      You mean like this?...My son is constantly begging to play with it but I've got the perfect design and would hate to have it broken.

      Angry Armadillo

    4. Re:Spacewarp? by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      Oh my god that thing was so much fun... probably gave me irreperable finger damage from wrangling the tracks and grippers, but man...

    5. Re:Spacewarp? by Mobster75 · · Score: 1
      Oh damn.... I remember those things.. they drove me nuts for hours on end in my teens... (I think i was 14 or so... but who knows?) That roller-coaster thing was a riot ;)


      Although... which construction set was it that had those damn red "riveter" things that would punch in those black rivets into those mostly grey flat pieces?? This goes back to when I was like 7 or 8 (1982? 83?)....

      Maybe I'm just having a psychotic episode...


      I wish I could see that new toy site.. But being /.'d sucks... Maybe /. might want to alert sites that are going to be hit up to invest in more bandwidth/server ability? (hey, my webservers avail on a mostly free OC48 ;) )


      The day that new toys come out that don't offer any challenge to kids is a very sad day indeed...... I had too damn many when I was a kid...


      - Mobster!

    6. Re:Spacewarp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I hate ebay. What a terrible user interface. Looks like I might have to check it out.

  12. Construx by Rubyflame · · Score: 1

    I have a large collection and I play with them every now and then. I have a working gatling gun that I made with Construx.

    I wish there had been something like Mindstorms with Construx. I'd be able to do tons of cool stuff with that...

    --

    All it takes is nukes and nerves.
    1. Re:Construx by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 1
      I don't know, I connected my C128 to my construx motor. I found that construx will mount breadboards fairly easily, so I designed a quick-and-dirty relay driver board and plugged it into the joystick port. It could only move back and forth but it was programmable.

      Of course, this was like 9 years ago. God I feel old...

    2. Re:Construx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have a working gatling gun that I made with Construx

      I made a working nuclear device with mine, but you don't hear me bragging.

    3. Re:CONSTRUX by crochese · · Score: 1

      The alien the airforce and... the motorized dinosaur. I was all about that motor kit when I got it. The good old days indeed

  13. Ah, but it's Lego Compatible by dmoen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't forget, Atollo is lego compatible. So you can have your dodecahedrons and robotize them too.

    --
    I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.
    1. Re:Ah, but it's Lego Compatible by archaism · · Score: 1

      So is K'nex! All ya gotta do is get yourself some (unfortunately named) Sploids. There are 4 different pieces that let you hook lego and k'nex together. I've not actually bought any of my own yet, but they look pretty cool. Too bad the site is obviously not set up to be /.ed.

  14. Re:you rich kids have it nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only if you got the money, to get money you need to be exploited or exploit someone else.

  15. atollo.com slashdotted. by LinuxSpaz · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a big kid so i still play with Lego. It appears as though atollo.com was slashdotted though, so a quick google search found this link:

    http://kidscience.about.com/library/weekly/aa11100 0a.htm

    Enjoy!

    1. Re:atollo.com slashdotted. by KarmaBlackballed · · Score: 2

      For some reason Lego masterpieces look better. Maybe it is because they have smooth sides and toys like this, teknic, and construct don't.

      --

      --- -- - -
      Give me LIBERTY, or give me a check.
  16. Finally, returning creativity to toys by CleverNickName · · Score: 2

    I loved LEGO as a kid. I spent countless hours making computers, houses, all manner of gun, and, of course, the ubiquitous robot.

    Now that I have kids of my own, they play with LEGO, and I don't even recognize the toys I grew up with.

    I mean, sure, it's cool to have the Star Wars sets and what not, and the little lego men look really cool and all, but where's the creativity? Unless you have serious cash to drop on the Mindstorms, the sets are so specialized that you can only make one thing out of them.

    I think that Atollo is a paradigm shift in construction-based toys, returning the focus to the user's creativity, rather than ability to follow diagrams in an instruction book.

    1. Re:Finally, returning creativity to toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks !

      This is exactly what we are aiming for, with hopefully a new flexible approach to building structures.

      Kids love projecting their imagination into their creations, and can now bend and flex them too.

      Hopefully the site will recover from being slashdotted soon ....

      Exclusive Kits will be available at Channel Discovery Stores in the US in the Fall.

    2. Re:Finally, returning creativity to toys by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      Is the server even up? I mean, being slashdotted is one thing, but having your server flat out down is another. Can you say down for the count?

    3. Re:Finally, returning creativity to toys by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      Maybe, but I still think the R2D2 from the Light Side Mindstorms kit is the coolest R2D2 model available, anywhere. It's functional and abstract at the same time.

      I should put mine back together, bung in some batteries and put it infront of my torch on flash mode.

  17. Construx by x136 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ahh.. Construx... That stuff was fun. I remember looking through the little booklets that came with the sets and seeing that you could buy sets with enough parts to build huge bridges and the like. Construx was cool in that the stuff you made was very rigid, so dune buggies didn't shatter when they flew off the curb... :)

    --
    SIGFEH
  18. 90% of the wealth is owned by 2% of the people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i loved your mom as a kid.

  19. Yeah it was by asinc · · Score: 1

    Construx was a lot of fun, actually. I still cherish a box of it somewhere back in a closet. I especially liked the fact you could easily build bigger structures with it than with lego... And of course you could have a nice motor with it and build a robot.

  20. i miss your mom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she loved it when i payed her for sex.
    kind of like people prostitute their labor under capitalism. are you a wage whore?
    i want to be free to live my life without having to worry about what im going to eat the next day.

    1. Re:i miss your mom by Elgon · · Score: 1

      Freedom is slavery.
      War is peace.

      Elgon

  21. Construx by Dopefish_1 · · Score: 1

    I always liked Construx a lot more than Legos when I was younger, and still have a huge box of parts in the closet. The only problem was that (at least where I lived), it was almost impossible to find the kits and stuff in stores.

    --

    #include <sig.h>
  22. Something "missing" with these by KernelHappy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Personally I think the reason why Legos remain the king of building toys is because they appealed to both kids who enjoy technical stuff as well as kids who just want to play. Toys like connex, capsela, robotix and even erector sets always seemed to appeal to more technical kids (like myself), and Atollo seems to be stuck in that same market. These toys may require more technical thinking, or dexterity than the average child may have. On a side note, is anyone else bothered by Lego's apparent need to make 200x the custom, one use only, decorative pieces? I bought the latest super car (8448) and have to order the silver champion only because I have an addiction, but I really don't like all these new pieces that are just for looks. It seems like their technic models are becoming less substantial.

    --
    -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
  23. Who needs motors? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 1

    Ingenuity. Thats all you need. Construx was a great toy and it had no fancy AI programability or motors. It had glow in the dark, and boy was that fancy! Another great non-powered toy was kinex. It had some great plans for cars, the only thing was it had no motor. I spent my time with the large rubber band that came in the kit and made my own windup powered car. The only thing was that I would wind it up so tight that the plastic parts would snap. The best part was getting as much power out of the plastic before it would snap.

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    1. Re:Who needs motors? by marvin+tph · · Score: 1

      Construx was a great toy and it had no fancy AI programability or motors

      I had a construx motor, I think my parents bought it seperately. It had a number of connectors on it's surface and 2 motorised wheels on each side (1 large, 1 small). There was a 3 state controller attached by a roughly 18" cable. And yes, I immediately used it to create a robot (although for some reason bipedal construx robots don't walk very well).
  24. Imagine... by liquid_5n4k3 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A beowulf cluster of these!

  25. ::sigh:: by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

    lame, old timer jokes are now obligatory it seems...

    --
    Photos.
  26. I loved construx by Monofilament · · Score: 1

    Right on... the glow in the dark features of contrux were awesome... I used to build body armor for myself as a kid with the snap on siding. Also Does anybody remember Capsella (I think thats how you spell it)??

    --


    Who makes you Sig?
    1. Re:I loved construx by faeryman · · Score: 1

      capsella(sp) rocked! i wondered if anyone was going to post about it.

      oh man, i always wanted the one that you could control with the IR remote. or the one (the 400 series?) that came with the big yellow pods to float your construction with.

      :)

      i remember one day, about 2 or 3 years after they quit making them, i saw the black IR robot at Service Merchandise in a badly damanged package on sale. i was going to get it, but back then i was little and didnt have any money :(

      i wonder...can buy these things on ebay because i would buy them again in a heartbeat. would prolly help to know the right spelling..

      --


      ,
      faeryman
    2. Re:I loved construx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah Capsella was way cool! I had tons of those. I even had a set that hooked up to the Commodore 64 and you could program up to 3 or 4 motors. I built a fan on a 3D arm that you could control with a joystick and make it blow in any direction.

  27. Two pieces! Sounds tedious! by Microsift · · Score: 1

    I mean would want to make a wall out of those, much less anything fun.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  28. This is just like those stupid rings at Denny's by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    To be perfectly honest, everyone has tried to capture what Lego has, and the harder they try the worse these toys get. Can I really see my 20 month old son having half a clue how to use these? Last night we opened a fresh new bucket of Duplos and he was putting near stuff together in no time. What am I supposed to do with these? Try to show him how the @#$@ing ball bearing fits in the socket!?

    Not so with Legos. Legos are rectangular (an easy shape for kids to understand), they fit together one way (no bending shit backwards to make a wheel or something equally stupid), they go together easily and stay, and they teach kids things such as spatial relationships and manual dexterity while allowing them to be creative. The last point is especially important because most other toys REQUIRE these skills BEFORE they can be used! You should have seen the smile on my son's face when he figured out how to put those Duplos together!

    And hey, when he gets older and wants to create big toys to go along with his Lego toys, I'll get him some Constructs.

    1. Re:This is just like those stupid rings at Denny's by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      Exactly! That's the first thing I thought when I saw it, "It's that Denny's thing".

      When you build something w/Legos it often looks like what you are trying to build.

      When you build something w/these things you kind of have to let your eyes go out of focus to figure out what it is. Sort of like those 3d posters that were all the rage a bit back.

      I'll stick w/the legos- thanks.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:This is just like those stupid rings at Denny's by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      Now thats being open minded! Most of the Lego models that you are talking about require the use of many unique custom made pieces. That that to the extreme, and for each model, you have one custom premade piece. What is the fun of that?

      When I was a kid, I never got the designer lego kits with all those custom pieces. I just got one of those HUGE bucket-o-legos that contained tons of various sized rectangular pieces. Thats where the creativity is at, and in fact, Atollo's is interesting for the same reason that electronic computing is interesting: two bits.

  29. Ahhh, Construx by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

    I still have all of mine. Really, the best part of building anything with Construx was to see how much punishment it took to destroy it.

    --
    Dyolf Knip
  30. Atollo Babbage Machine! by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    Yeah, who needs electronic CPUs for mindstorm like projects, and why use chemical batteries? I want to see a fully mechanical robot that stores energy as gravitational potential.

    1. Re:Atollo Babbage Machine! by quintessent · · Score: 2

      ...and after you drop it, it does a realistic simulation of a robot crashing into the ground and breaking into a thousand pieces.

  31. How about Capsela? by codon77 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This was one cool toy from the early 80's: Capsela. Had hours of fun making boats, tanks and cars, all from the same kit. Each item was a spherical module that could be attached to other modules such as motors, various gearing mechanisms, pumps, clutches....a really good variety of devices.

    Now I wonder what happened to that kit that was under my bed?

    1. Re:How about Capsela? by dranga · · Score: 1

      Capsela! That was the name of the things.. I was trying to remember the name of them while I was reading the lego thread... I used to make boats out of them and drive them around in the pool since you could make the motors up high and use drive-shaft modules universal-joint modules to drive the propellers down under the water...

      --
      Oh no, not again.
    2. Re:How about Capsela? by almightyjustin · · Score: 1

      I remember those! I remember I got a little set that made a go-cart thing with a motor and stuff. And then I used tape to attach bunch of copper wire to the electric connectors and used a little switch at the other end as a remote control. >:D

      The main thing I didn't like about them was they were a bugger to put together and take apart; it took way more strength than I had at 9 or so, and I wound up breaking several of the capsule things.

      --

      Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

    3. Re:How about Capsela? by dgp · · Score: 1

      oh yeah! Capsela rocked! It was a pretty simple system. It addressed areas that Lego traditionally did not, like floating and running propellers in the water. I liked watching the gears turn.

    4. Re:How about Capsela? by psxndc · · Score: 1
      Though I always envied the kids on my block that had capsela, the only thing I can think of making with them now would be a bong. All the clear bubbles and motors....

      psxndc

      --

      The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    5. Re:How about Capsela? by mosch · · Score: 2

      Dude, Capsela rocked the body that rocks the party! I'd build cars that turned into boats and shit. I loved that thing. The only thing I hated was that there was no way to make two motors run at the same exact speed. Well that and the fact that when I was a kid rechargeable battery technology sucked ass.

  32. What do I buy for a 3-year old? by RobertGraham · · Score: 2
    Xmas is coming up; are these too complex for my 3-year old niece?

    BTW, I think I would have liked these much more as a child. Some people might think that Legos are better because they have more variety of pieces. I think the reverse is true: the reason I liked Legos as a child was because I figured out how to build things that were not drawn for me. I NEVER attempted to build the demonstrations they had pictured on the box. With these things, I would have been able to express even more creativity.

    I think Legos were a significant contributer to my geek status: now I put together code in much the same way that I put Legos together. I enjoy building things that nobody has ever thought of.

    Am I wrong trying to pass these values onto my niece? I think I would rather buy her geek things that stretch the mind rather than clothes or dolls, but then, am I just passing my values onto her?

    1. Re:What do I buy for a 3-year old? by Chundra · · Score: 0

      Maybe not too complex, but they look pretty small. If she's anything like your average 3 year old don't risk it. Unless of course you're a firm believer in natural selection. You know... the kid who swallows too many atollos doesn't grow up to have kids of their own.

    2. Re:What do I buy for a 3-year old? by Leeto2 · · Score: 1
      Two questions you need to ask yourself about getting this toy for your niece.

      1. What is the age range of these toys?
      (Taking a guess, I'd say 3 and up looks about right.)

      2. Does she have any younger siblings?
      (Small toys or small pieces present possible choking hazards to wee ones.)

      As to whether or not your're wrong aboout yer values, don't sweat it. I think it's an awsome idea to introduce her to new and challenging stuff. God knows we need more female geeks in this world. :) Your niece is lucky to have an Uncle that actually puts some thought into the things he buys.

      --



      "That's no moon"... Obi-Wan Kenobi
    3. Re:What do I buy for a 3-year old? by NaturePhotog · · Score: 2

      Duplo, of course :-)

      My 3 year old nephew loves 'em. And tries to play with (i.e., destroy) his big brother and big sister's creations with regular Lego. When they were visiting from Germany this summer, I hauled out my old Legos (thanks, Mom) and the two older ones played with them for hours. I even got the old Lego train to work.

      All three of them love Lego. There are differences in how they play with them, but I think the differences are more to do with personality and age differences than gender. By all means...help stretch your niece's mind with toys that make her think. Lots of people will likely get her clothes and dolls...be the *fun* uncle instead :-) When she's a little older, you can take her to Legoland in Denmark or in California, which ever is closer. Or do other stuff she likes, like chase butterflies, look at tide pools or whatever.

    4. Re:What do I buy for a 3-year old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not the best way to make a good geek impression on her.

      When I was 5 I discovered my friend's set of Cpasella. When I annoyed my parents to the point of purchasing me one, I started out by building the designs in the book. But once I understood the basiscs of how everything worked ( and expanded my set ), I started to break the mold and build all sorts of stuff. You had to understand the mechanics of the powertrain before you could visualize integrating it into a structure.

      When I got Construx things were a little different. The basic lengthwise and octagonal pieces with simple fasteners made sense, so I pretty much ignored the book. But then again, my friends and I mainly used the Construcx to build cars/planes/other toys to bash into each other. Later, when they released the motor add-on with drive belts, we hardly used them. They just didnt seem to meld well.

      Lego Technics came a few years later, and combining the versatility and durability of Construx and the flexible powertrain system of Capsella, it was a step up. I admit that even as a building set veteran, I had to build the models in the Lego Technics book to gain an understanding of these improved tools. But again, once I had an understanding I built some really cool things.

      So back to the subject. These things look less obvious and durable than constructs / normal legos. The imagination is a powerful tool, but it needs a foundation to take hold. Buy her a basic legos set, and a couple years down the road move her on to technics or introduce her to something like this.

    5. Re:What do I buy for a 3-year old? by beth_linker · · Score: 1

      Looking at the pictures, my guess is that these wouldn't be good for a 3-year-old because they're small enough to swallow. Wait until she's older. I think LEGO still makes a set of bricks for young children that are slightly larger than the standard ones, those might be safer.

  33. Construx Rock!! by Synchis · · Score: 1

    I remember 12 or 13 years back when I got my first set of construx for christmas. I loved them, and the first night I had them, I had a fully functional working crane built. They were a blast.

    Anybody else remember building stuff like that? Or am I just wierd? :)

    --
    Thomas A. Knight
    Author of The Time Weaver
  34. I So Loved my Legos... by Craka · · Score: 1

    First off here's a link to the various cached pages at google Here Don't know how much of a help they'll be though...

    &nbsp&nbsp Legos were by far my favorite toy when I was a kid. The reason was because it was a fun challenge to see if you could make something with just 20 (or so) basic pieces (of course then there were the specialty legos which there are now a million and a half) But if these allow you to make any shape, what's the point? It takes all the challenge and imagination out of looking at that pile of disjunct legos on the floor and seeing what it could be: a Deluxe Super Moon Skimmer with missle ports... oh and a... It was fun cause it was hard and it took your imagination. I kinda pity the kids who grow up today (or didn't grow up) without legos. Those were the happy years (this is kind of ironic as I am only 20 but hey)
    &nbsp&nbsp Now I stare at a blank screen and a keyboard and see that quicksort function it could be =)

    --
    "Madness and Genius are separated solely by Degrees of Success." -Unknown
  35. Be a kid again, its good for you. by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    If you guys want to find great new or classic toys, check out Dr Toy's site. Written by a Dr that specializes in toys.

  36. What ? by mimbleton · · Score: 1

    These are toys we are talking about here!
    Come one people, you are not 9 years old anymore.
    Why is this even here on /. ?

    1. Re:What ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Listen you sorry SOB, if you don't like toys, fine, but most really intelligent geeks love toys. The greater the mind, the greater the need for play.


      I'm 23, have a 172 IQ, and simply love LEGOs. Modeling complex structures with those wonderful ABS bricks is one of my very favorite pastimes.


      If you don't like toys, I pity you. Perhaps you're just in that 14-18 year old or so range where you think toys are stupid... Don't worry, if you've got enough brain power, you'll grow out of it. :) (We Adult Fans Of LEGO -AFOLs- call it the "dark ages" - when you sell all your LEGO, or other toys for that matter, then regret it years later.)


      P.S. For those interested in LEGO building products and the simply amazing things you can to with them, check out www.Lugnet.com and www.BrickShelf.com.

    2. Re:What ? by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      Oh, I knew people that had extremely high IQ yet were dead before age of 30 due to , well, stupidity on their part.

  37. Oh great by DoubleD · · Score: 1

    So now we have robots going around independent of conventional sources of energy for sustinence knocking everthing they see over so they can capture the gravitational potential

    Think it wont happen just wait till *you* get knocked over by some contraption just so it can recharge

    --
    "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep in order to gain what he cannot lose."
    1. Re:Oh great by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      I have always wanted to see someone make a nice accurate software kinetics simulator where all kinetic calculations preserve kinetic energy (hence no friction), and then populate it with artificial purely-mechanical life... and like you said, the life forms would compete for kinetic energy of any kind, even energy stored in other objects as gravitational potential energy.

      I mean, you guys saw the WTC buildings fall. It takes allot of energy to shoot dust and other junk the distances it was shot from those buildings. Its all because of the massive amount of energy stored in those buildings in the form of gravitational potential.

      If such life is possible, then the system would keep some level of order, as opposed to decaying into chaotic moving pieces... and who knows, more sophisticated life forms might evolve.

    2. Re:Oh great by Trinn · · Score: 1

      That actually sounds like a very very cool idea. I'd love to see anything you get out of that. Let me know if anything happens. I'm all for evolving new life forms.

  38. LEGO & Design Philosophy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LEGO killed proper engineering education because of it's snap together nature, engineering and design doesn't work like that... you design an object which then fits together perfectly, but obviously LEGO always does that for you, hence poor design process, you miss a vital step.

    Now Mechano was a proper practical set that actually made you think! Also very versatile, hopefully some of the old school /.'ters will back me up here.

  39. ATOLLO in Discovery Channel Stores in November2001 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An Exclusive Kit will be available in Discovery Channel Stores in the US in November later this year !

    Other Kits are becoming available at speciality stores/museums throughout the US and in Europe.

    Hopefully the site will recover soon and you'll be able to check things out online.

    By the way, these are the first two pieces, not the only two !

    And thanks for all the "constructive" input !

    -atollo-inventor

  40. Capsela was awesome... by Spiral+Man · · Score: 1
    i always thought they were more fun than legos, definately more educational (especially the normal legos that didnt do much). they were lego technics before they even existed. plus, they had cool stuff like propellers, and floats and stuff. it was neat that what you bult would actually run on its own...

    --
    "we demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!" --Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
  41. It's actually reasonably priced, too. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    coming in at around just over 10 cents/piece.

    It seems to me that lego some lego kits come it at upwards of 50 cents or more per piece.

    Always was a rip off. Not that it's not fun.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
    1. Re:It's actually reasonably priced, too. by almightyjustin · · Score: 1

      The way to go with Legos is what I've been doing of late, which is pick up the "unpopular" or "old" sets from clearance bins. The pieces are basically the same and they're much cheaper (I've found a number of 30+ piece packages for like 2 bucks each). Then, you get home, dump all the pieces into the "master bin" and enjoy! I do dislike the amount of specialty lego pieces now, but if you mix and match them from many different sets there's still room for lots of creativity.

      --

      Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

  42. Lego will never be replaced by Tyger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree with you, these are lacking. They are lacking the same thing every other construction toy lacks. Simplicity. Sure there are only two pieces, but way too many ways to connect them.

    The advantage of Lego is that it is SIMPLE. There may be a lot of different pieces, but conceptually they are all the same. You always connect them the exact same way. That is their appeal, you can sit down and put them together right away, starting to explore the construction and creativity involved immediately, instead of having to first explore the ways to put them together and how they interact. Lego is a classic. It is simple. Anybody can pick it up and make stuff.

    So while this looks like it has possibilities, I don't see it replacing Lego, just like other things have yet to replace lego.

    Now if just Lego would go back to the basics instead of doing all these specialized kits.

  43. Slashdotted by Phroggy · · Score: 2

    Perhaps they built their Web server out of some of their own toys?

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  44. Grow up, will ya? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    These are toys we are talking about here!
    Come one people, you are not 9 years old anymore.
    Why is this even here on /. ?


    You have kids? Guess not. Personally, I want my kid to be able to enjoy all the stuff I did as a child. Sure, OOP is much more advanced than Legos, but the seeds were planted there...

    1. Re:Grow up, will ya? by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      I do have kids.
      I do want them to enjoy all this stuff.
      I just don't want to find that information on supposedly technical site.

    2. Re:Grow up, will ya? by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      Technical site? Supposedly technical site? Not THIS slashdot!

      /. is "News for Nerds." Playing with kids toys is very nerdy, or at least very geeky. Just look at Lego Mindstorms sales figures for the first two years. (Summary: They sold ~10 times as many sets as they expected, and the largest purchasing demographic was 20-35 year old men, NOT 10-15 year old kids)
      Apparently this matters quite a bit to the average /. reader. If you don't like it, then don't read the bloody article!

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  45. Construx aren't sold any more!? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    Ok, who thinks we should start a petition to get Fisher Price to start making these things again? I mean, my son will be old enough in a couple years here and I only have a small bucket full!

  46. construx? What about capsela! by enrico_suave · · Score: 2

    A toy is not a toy unless you can take it into the bath tub with you....err... hopefully you are familiar with capsela lest you think I had some other sort of pseudo-submersible toy... er.. ah never mind...

    E.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    1. Re:construx? What about capsela! by fo0bar · · Score: 1

      Right on! My neighbor and I would build capsela bots and then would do a "total competition" consisting of a race, a tug-of-war competition, and to see who could piss off my sister the fastest.

      Unfortunately I never got the kit with the yellow buyoys, so I never got the chance to make speed boats.

      God, I haven't thought of capsela in years... now it's all coming back to me (like the fact that the battery compartment would always keep getting undone).. Thanks for the reminder!

  47. Oh Construx by Cylix · · Score: 2

    I wonder if these still aren't available somewhere and relatively cheaply.

    These were absolutely great!

    A friend built an 8 foot told humanoid construct. It didn't quite move a great deal, but it was fascinating at the time.

    I myself constructed a small two foot electric chair. I took the aluminum from cans and took strips along the arm rests and legs to for conduction. Then later cut the leads from the lights and battery construx thingie. It was quite interesting... mom didn't agree. It was dismantled later to end her shouts.

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  48. An open specs toy construction set by lowieken · · Score: 1

    That would be cool.

    You could start with 3d modelling in software, and end up with several manufacturers using cool designs that are a lot more affordable. And interoperable.

    Development cost to manufacturers would be close to zero.
    You would need lower critical mass for production. Each manufacturer has the advantage of the "installed base" of compatible manufacturers.

    Such stuff would be a hell of a lot cheaper to get into a kid's hands. Which is good for the not-so-wealthy among them.

  49. Buy her Legos by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    As I said in another post, these things require that the child already have deterity and spatial abilities. If the child is still developing (like a 3 year old) Legos are MUCH better. As an added bonus, she can play with them with her friends as they will most likely understand legos too. (If my 20 month old son can use Duplos, anyone can use Lego products.)

    If you don't believe me on how much better Legos are, try going to Denny's sometime and asking for their ring building set to try out. You'll find that these more "technical" toys are extremely unsuited to young children and they will become bored with them very fast.

  50. Not for sale by BMonger · · Score: 1

    According to this link this product is no longer for sale since nobody can actually get to the site... :)

  51. Construx! by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah! I completely forgot about these, until this little reminder! When I was younger, I had lots of 'em... lots. Probably only had a few in reality, but my memory says 'lots'. I just checked on ebay, and theres tons for sale... hmm... I need to build something now.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:Construx! by yzquxnet · · Score: 1

      I think I had a bigger collection of construx than I ever did of Legos. I loved constructs because I could build relativly large structures with few pieces as compared to Legos at the time. I managed to break most of the pieces by subjecting them to stress test. I know everyone out there has built a bridge out of those things and stacked books on top to see how much it would hold.

      Admit it!

      As a side note, the closest thing that I can think of that would be a modern day contrux would be Kineks (Kinex, Kinects, sp???) My little brother as more of those damn things. We built a tower structure once that was almost as tall as our house. (That's how many he has!) Bridges are a blast to make too.

      Oh, man... time to put on my engineers hat. I'm going to go build something. lol

  52. Pronunciation? by Kasreyn · · Score: 2

    Would this be pronounced boring old "Ah-tole-oh" or exciting hispanic "A-toy-o"? =)

    It's got "toy" right in the NAME, it has to be good! =)

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
    1. Re:Pronunciation? by 1337+$14X0r · · Score: 1

      My thoughts had it rhyming with Apollo.
      A-tall-o?

      *watches Karma plummet*

      --

      --- Sigs are dumb.

    2. Re:Pronunciation? by smaughster · · Score: 1

      Then stick to Lego, since it is short for Leg Got, meaning good toys.

      --
      I intend to live forever, so far so good.
  53. Atollo at Discovery Channel Stores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently you'll be able to get kits in November at Discovery Channel Stores.

    Or, I guess when the site recovers from being slashdotted....

  54. Offtopic, but funny by zaius · · Score: 2, Funny
    If you follow the link in this comment's parent, you'll find a picture of a person in the upper left-hand corner of the page.

    Is it a man or a woman?

    1. Re:Offtopic, but funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bio says the person's name is Gayle and it uses 'she' in it, so it must be female.

    2. Re:Offtopic, but funny by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but "she" has an adam's apple bigger than my fist!

    3. Re:Offtopic, but funny by hoggoth · · Score: 1
      >If you follow the link in this comment's parent, you'll find a picture of a person in the upper left-hand corner of the page.
      >Is it a man or a woman?

      Um, Hello? "GAY"le Olson?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    4. Re:Offtopic, but funny by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I'm biting this but...I couldn't resist.

      That's Gayle the friendly eco-scientist-hippie thing! S/he is so PC and eco-oriented s/he hasn't chosen a sexual orientation OR a stance on stem cell research! Oh that funky Gayle...always in the middle.

  55. I have some by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    And I did some searching. Go search EBay and you can find a boatload of 'em!

  56. Just a thought, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't you boys a little too fucking OLD to be playing with LEGO blocks? Jesus fucking christ!

    (I guess you little geeks have already forgotten the events of a week ago. For shame.)

    1. Re:Just a thought, but... by JohnnyBolla · · Score: 1

      Nope. Intelligent people like to excersise thier minds, frequently in non-traditional ways, like playing with Legos or making sweet love to your Mom.
      How long are we supposed to think of only the bombings, exactly. I assume you have quit your job, given nine pints of blood and enlisted, right?
      We have to get back to our lives or the country will grind to a halt.
      When it comes time to do something about the attacks, then we'll do it.

      --
      Carpe Deez
    2. Re:Just a thought, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yeah, SURE you have to get on with your life. But getting ON with one's life does NOT mean playing with toys made for 5 year olds when you're over 20. I mean, Christ man! GET A FUCKING LIFE. *

      * Yes, I need one too. No need to point it out, but CHRIST MAN, GROW THE FUCK UP. **
      ** Okay, I should do some growing up too, but MY GOD MAN. YOU'RE PLAYING WITH LEGOS!

  57. Imagine by lowieken · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Imagine there's no heaven
    It's easy if you try
    No hell below us
    Above us only sky
    Imagine all the people
    Living for today...

    Imagine there's no countries
    It isn't hard to do
    Nothing to kill or die for
    And no religion too
    Imagine all the people
    Living life in peace...

    You may say I'm a dreamer
    But I'm not the only one
    I hope someday you'll join us
    And the world will be as one

    Imagine no possessions
    I wonder if you can
    No need for greed or hunger
    A brotherhood of man
    Imagine all the people
    Sharing all the world...

    You may say I'm a dreamer
    But I'm not the only one
    I hope someday you'll join us
    And the world will live as one

  58. redunant? by mesmin · · Score: 1

    The name Atollo comes from the Latin word "atollo" which means to raise a building Hey, I love redunacy in servers... but damn.

  59. Another toy by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2

    Just recently I came across a toy with little rods with magnets at each end (edges) and ball bearings (verticies.) This looks great for playing around with polyhedrae, latices, etc. There were three disadvantages: It was pretty expensive for what it was, there is only one length of edge, and there is insufficient room for 12 edges to come from one vertex, which rules out some latices. Sorry, I can't remember the name of the toy.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
    1. Re:Another toy by stuq · · Score: 1

      I think your talking about our toy, Roger's Connection. It's available at www.dstoys.com, along with quite a few other advanced toys. You should have had room for 12 vertices, if not something was broken. The multiple lengths thing will be improved upon soon. Sorry about the expense, those neodymium magnets are *quite* expensive, even when you buy them in the millions

    2. Re:Another toy by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2

      This is not the toy I was looking for. OK, it is exactly the same idea, and looks better than the ones I'd seen, but is even more expensive. The set I'd seen had much shorter edges in multiple colours, and the edges had a narrow bit in the middle (not cylindrical) and were multiple colours.

      --
      Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  60. Don't be so pessimistic by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

    The cool pieces like the laser dish with it's connecting struts and the curved shield pieces were lots of fun when I was a kid. They added the extra touch to the model that really made my model come alive! After all, what's a moonbase without lasers and forcefields? Besides, he was referring to how most of these other toys are much more of an approximation. Out of Legos I can create a starbase. Out of these... things... I can create a mish-mash of pieces that I CLAIM is a starbase. Good luck convincing anyone else.

    1. Re:Don't be so pessimistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you sound so much like Ralph Wiggum it's frightening!

      Oh boy, sleep! That's where I'm a viking!

  61. knunky american toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While my pre-school counterparts are prototyping their sloppy block worlds with legos... I was using my well designed fisher scientific tools and my father's ogranic chemistry stick-and-ball modeling set of map my perfect vision of the future.

    ...unfortunatly, I've found that a world raised on mediocrity interperts better designed ideas as arrogance.

    ...well fuck them and fuck the world that supports them.

    1. Re:knunky american toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...unfortunatly, I've found that a world raised on mediocrity interperts better designed ideas as arrogance.

      You sound like an Amiga user.

  62. Yes for Sale ! by atollo-inventor · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry the site is clogged, but none the less you can get kits at a few stores around the US, and soon at Discovery Channel Stores.

    Some basic info for those that couldn't make it to the site... yet.

    Yes there are initially only two pieces and the system is LEGO compatible.

    The pieces are currently made in Scotland ! Yes, amazingly other things do come out of Scotland other than single malt !

    One person nailed our intent on the head in an earlier message, we hope to introduce a new creative building system for all ages.
    You can build anything from dinosaurs to geometric space structures !

    Hope some of you manage to make it to the site,
    and thanks for the "constructive" feedback.

  63. Mod parent up (The AC, not the orig poster) by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Stupid lameness filter... *grumble*

  64. Relax... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're not here to judge you, we're just here to provide support.

  65. Mecano? by !Xabbu · · Score: 1

    That was a toy... the old fashioned kinda toy where you used a screwdriver and if you chewed on the pieces you would either choke up screws or lacerate yourself. Those where the days....

    --

    - Jimbob
  66. I just have to respond by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I personally think that the parent post, as inflamatory as it is, should be modded up.

    I'm personally somewhat younger, and my IQ, as if it matters anything, is somewhere in that range. And I agree wholeheartedly.

    I grew up in such a way that everything looked like a building set to me. My favorite toys age 11-14 were solderless breadboard and 7400-series TTL logic. I've had virtually all the major building sets, Construx, Meccano, Robotix, Capsela, Lasy (that's a little obscure), used Lego considerably (my brother had some). I had a half-dozen Radio Shack lab kits. I've programmed since I was five.

    Any parent thinking I'm a special case should reevaluate how they perceive their children. Intelligence is learned, during (generally) the first 6 years of life.

    And is it any wonder I ended up in Engineering?

  67. There is no such thing as a "one use only Lego" by hamjudo · · Score: 1
    Lego's apparent need to make 200x the custom, one use only, decorative pieces?

    Try playing with them like a six year old.

    My six year old son spends a lot of time adding special equipment onto robots, planes, spaceships, cars, submarines, etc... An arm from a Bionicle makes a fine rocket engine. Did you know that if you put a propellor onto car, it can be a submarine, too?

    Try connecting the "decorative pieces" in different ways. Notice how Lego uses just a few basic dimensions again and again. A Lego axle fits in the same size hole as a bump on the basic brick, as does the tip of the Lego pine tree and a gazillion other Lego parts. Likewise, many things are just the right size for a minifig's hands (claws).

    If the instructions in the fancy sets blind you to the other ways to use the pieces, just buy the big blue tubs of basic bricks.

    1. Re:There is no such thing as a "one use only Lego" by jafuser · · Score: 1
      If the instructions in the fancy sets blind you to the other ways to use the pieces, just buy the big blue tubs of basic bricks.

      I wish they had big tubs of basic technic bricks. Anyone know of such a thing?

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    2. Re:There is no such thing as a "one use only Lego" by KernelHappy · · Score: 1

      My six year old son spends a lot of time adding special equipment onto robots, planes, spaceships, cars, submarines, etc... An arm from a Bionicle makes a fine rocket engine. Did you know that if you put a propellor onto car, it can be a submarine, too?

      I am not doubting in any way that Legos foster creative and technical thinking in wee ones because they make propellers, trees, satellite dishes etc (infact I agree its the opposite). I should have explained myself a little better. Look at the newer super car compared to the previous super car and the older auto chassis. The previous one (I believe set 8880 - the black diablo looking car) was almost entirely standard technic pieces and really was a beautiful and technical model. Recently lego has shifted to using more parts that are for show only, such as the side panels on the silver champion and the roll cage looking tubing to define the shape of the body on the new super car (set 8448).

      I guess ultimately my complaint is not that they make specialized pieces, but that they are making specialized pieces for sets that aren't really needed. Check out the latest super car and the silver champion, you'll probably notice up the pieces I'm talking about that aren't really needed because their purpose in the model could be accomplished with more traditional technic bricks.

      --
      -- Button up, your ignorance is showing
    3. Re:There is no such thing as a "one use only Lego" by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      >If the instructions in the fancy sets blind you to the other ways to use the pieces, just buy the big blue tubs of basic bricks

      I bought a big tub of Kentucky Fried Chicken and have built a nifty robot out of the pieces. If you hold them together until the grease congeals they stick together nicely. I put it on my mantle, and it looks great! It's starting to smell pretty bad though :-(

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  68. Bigger is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys should get together with the company that makes all those outdoor plastic playsets. Imagine the castles the kids could construct with sockets the size of a human femur.

  69. Collecting Dust by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 2

    I've got boxes of Lego and Construx at home sitting in the basement. Haven't opened the boxes in years, but I still remember using Super Glue to allow perfectly stable cross overs. :)

    --

    "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
  70. Construx!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Construx were the shit! I still have mine. I have the motors and lights sets.....they are so cool

  71. Atollo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Atolla sounds suspiciously like "Ayatolli". Is this a new tool of terror?

  72. Make a chicken, and you've got.. by Starving+Artist · · Score: 1

    Atollo the hen

    1. Re:Make a chicken, and you've got.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was funny !

  73. I built my computer case out of Construx! by Enferris · · Score: 1

    It's great, put stuff where you need it when you need it...no more trying to stretch ribbon cables as far as they'll go- just slap a new bay right next to the other one in 2 minutes. Those little plastic panels that fit in the middle of the rectangles are pretty much like regular bay covers anyway. There could be a whole new market for these babies. As far as construction toys go you can't forget about Lincoln Logs (going back a little further)

    1. Re:I built my computer case out of Construx! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pictures please

  74. Aesthetics? by jawad · · Score: 1

    The problem with these building blocks is that they're not pretty. I can design something out of Lego bricks that ends up being aesthetically pleasing when i'm done. To get these things to be nice looking, you have to blur your eyes. Most of you geeks prolly don't give a damn about aestetics (look at your own computers, 90% of you) but they matter.

    Anyway, a lot of things have tried to tackle the king of the heap, but I don't think Lego bricks will be coming down anytime soon.

    1. Re:Aesthetics? by Cardinal+Vishnu · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The new 'pretty pieces' notwithstanding, Lego just has so much more to offer those who want to build something fairly realistic. I've seen about a dozen of these rainbow-crappy-blocks/Lego-wannabes come and go in the past several years, and I'm sure the same fate awaits this latest entry in the category.

  75. Fischertechnik by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid, we had great fun with Fischertechnik, which we found out about through
    a German friend of the family. It's kind of a
    cross between Lego Technic and Meccano. There
    site (yes, it's in German) is at http://www.fischertechnik.de/. Great stuff.

  76. Never had Lego - had "Rasti" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was I the only one?

  77. don't forget scottish men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pieces are currently made in Scotland ! Yes, amazingly other things do come out of Scotland other than single malt !

    mmm scotsmen

  78. Ever heard of Ramagon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No one here has mentioned Ramagon! This was my favorite for building huge structures fast. Hubs with sockets in 26 directions (each one 45 degrees from its neighbor, i think), and two lengths of rods, in a ratio of 1:1.414 (square root of 2). Supposedly NASA used them to model space stations, but probably all building toys make that claim.

    They always did have very poor distribution. There was only one store where it could be found in my town (and never at a Toys R Us). But now they're sold on the web (ramagon.com).

    1. Re:Ever heard of Ramagon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ramagon? Isn't that an Islamic holiday? DEATH TO THE IMPERIALIST LEGO PLAYING AMERICANS.

  79. What about Zaks? by PoiznDrt · · Score: 1

    I just took a look at the Atollo and they remind me of Zaks...except with Zaks there were 2 or 3 diffi pieces...Square and triangle pieces, they just snapped together...
    looks like the same basic idea, could the Atollo be a new evolved type of Zaks?

    1. Re:What about Zaks? by jokrswild · · Score: 1

      Zaks were great. Atollo also brought those to mind for me. Except Zaks are made by OhioArt, the same company that makes Etch-a-sketch. I don't think they make them anymore. Fortunately, i have two big bags worth of them!

    2. Re:What about Zaks? by Telek · · Score: 2

      ZAKS!!!!!!!!! OH my god!!!!

      Wow. I used to have a lot of those too. Oh man that stuff was fun... Not nearly as mechanical as Meccano or even Lego could be, but it was damned cool. And when you hit them really hard they just shattered, much better than lego did =P. The cool parts was that due to the shapes you could have cool things happen by pushing on certain parts of them, which would cause others to move. Umm, closest anaolgy I can think of would be something like oragami. Anywyas, that stuff was cool. Oh ... the days... Man I'm old now! =(

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  80. try rokenbok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.rokenbok.com

    a cross between lego and remote control stuff.

    Might be a bit for the younger kids (ie it's not MindStorm), I don't really know yet (because it seems a bit expensive and I haven't bought any for my kid yet). But my 5 year old is dying for it.

  81. Kid toy fundamentalism! by yourdogunix · · Score: 1

    Atollo Khameinei!

  82. Another great system Lasy by Mortenson · · Score: 1
    Another great system is Lasy http://www.lasy.com They have three sizes of blocks which all interconnect. This is great because you can give them to a todler and then expand to new sets with smaller pieces as they get older. The largest size of blocks let the kids (or parents) make thinks like bikes that the kids can actually ride in.

    I haven't seen them myself, but they also have some robotic kits which can be controlled from a computer. http://www.lasy.com/products/robot.html

  83. Meccano by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

    Lego is all very well and good, but it doesn't beat Meccano. You've gotta love something you can build a working orrery or a working vending machine out of.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  84. Just try... by jpm242 · · Score: 1

    making robots like this using 2 pieces. LEGO rules.

    JP.

    --
    --- Worst tagline ever.
  85. Can't make Robots like by jpm242 · · Score: 1

    this -> http://jp.dnsalias.net:8080 using 2 different parts.

    JP

    --
    --- Worst tagline ever.
  86. CONSTRUX by topace · · Score: 1

    Construx, You Build, the Alien, the Airforce! ahh the good old days :p

  87. erector set + construx = lots of fun by Chris+Deckard · · Score: 1

    I used to make crossbow like weapons out of constructs. I'd use the long rods from the erector set I had (normally used for axles in vehicles) and used it as a guide for the little blue connector thingies. The rod was just the right size for the blue thingies to slide down it. Take a bunch of rubber bands and you got a nice little "toy" to bug your sister with. hehe.

    -Chris

  88. Re:I loved capsella by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Capsella kicked ass. Before their was aibo ther was capo. Oh he wasn't a smart dog. Damn thing had wacky legs, and couldn't stop walking, but those were the days.

  89. 3-bit computer by dmatos · · Score: 1

    Robert A Heinlein had a 3-bit computer in Number of the Beast at one point. It was only briefly mentioned that it used trinary logic rather than binary, and I believe it was based on 3-phase A/C power, rather than the DC that computers are now based on.

    As for why a trinary computer would be better, consider it analagous to why a language with 10 words is better than one with only 4. You can say a lot more things in a lot less space. Of course, how this would actually be accomplished is very hard for us to envision, as we are so used to the binary logic of true and false, on and off. Kudos to the guy that can actually wrap his head around it.

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  90. zaks still rule by esoteric0 · · Score: 1

    apparently all you people missed out on the fun of zaks. i was the only one i knew who played with them, and they beat the crap out of legos. the could move, for one thing. plus they were lego compatible.

  91. You only want them because they talk about nodes by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Heck, I'm 18 years old and I'm gonna check these guys out.

    You only want them because they talk about nodes. (A "node" is an entry in E2, and anotherone is one of the E2 editors.)

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  92. Lego compatible! by kryptik_79 · · Score: 1

    The site boasts that the peices are lego compatible, that's pretty cool!

  93. Meccano was what I had. by akc · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid I had something called Meccano. Was that the same you were thinking of? This had loads of metal girders, and metal plates with holes in every half inch or so. Girders were green plates where red (that was in the mid fifties - I think later versions had yellow girders and black plates). Small nuts and bolts where used to join it all together.

    I used to build cranes with it, and had an electric motor and loads of gears. Careful engineering of the gearbox would allow you to

    a) Drive cabin rotation around the main mast

    Had a special piece which was two wheels with a ball race in between. One of the pieces had a sproketed outside which would take a chain. This was bolted to the girder structure that made the crane tower, the other half to the cabin bottom. An axel throught the cabin bottom with a small sproketted wheel would then have a chain round the gear bolted to the crane tower and you could make the cabin rotate.

    b) Lift the jib up and down, AND
    c) Lift the hook up and down

    I seem to remember making a gear box with a gear on a movable axel that you could make move back and forth with a lever. Dependent on which gear engaged you could either drive the jib or the hook. Worm gears where used to slow down the motor to a sensible speed.

    Another lever allowed you to control the motor (forward, stop, reverse).

    We bought all this stuff and it came in cardboard boxes. My father built a wooden cabinet with special dividers to keep it all in.

    1. Re:Meccano was what I had. by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

      Meccano is similar. My erector sets were plain metal colored (may have been galvanized, but I seem to recall a little rusting, so who knows). I also remember thikning that they should have spent some time grinding down the edges of the girders so that they wouldn't be so darned sharp. As it was, it was easy to cut yourself on the stamped-out girders. One more reason I liked construx and Lincoln Logs (aka, the toy most easily converted to a lever/fulcrum laungher-of-everything-small) - they couldn't cut me unless something very wrong was being done. :)

    2. Re:Meccano was what I had. by Telek · · Score: 2

      Pretty sure it was Meccano. This was like 15 years ago folks =). I can't remember what I had for breakfast a week ago nevermind what toys I played with when I was 8.

      But from the sounds of everyone's posts, yeah it was Meccano. The edges on everything was round, and I never had much trouble with the screws.

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  94. Baa. by hackie · · Score: 1

    Won't beat lego

    --
    Segmentation fault. .sig dumped.
  95. Nope. by Dwonis · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, but LEGO blocks are much more sturdy (especially with epoxy). These things are nice toys, but suck for prototyping anything.

    1. Re:Nope. by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      I take that back. They would be somewhat useful for robotics, due to the large spaces between pieces. Still, I prefer LEGO.

  96. The Real Toys our children will never see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see people have mentioned Capsella, tinkertoys, lincoln logs, erector sets and construx, but there's a couple more I'd want to still be able to get.

    One was a simple building set made basically of black girders with vertical and horizontal pieces. Sticking a vertical piece into the top of another vertical piece anchored up to 4 horizontal pieces held between the two. The set was for building skyscrapers, and man could it back that up. I suppose you can use construx ok for it, but it made pretty nice looking skyscrapers, even had office building like window panels to complete the look. Specialized, but neat stuff.

    The other one was an absolutely fascinating system primarily using little cubes where each side of the cube had a peg or a hole so you could lock the cubes together. But the cube also had a side or two that was hinged and could "open" up. so yu could build hinged/mechanical things (open a lot of the cubes and you could make flexible, snake constructions, things with arms, etc.). Add a few triangular and other random pieces and it was a reallyodd but neat set. Anyone remember this? I'd love to hear the name, as I inherited it from my brother and have never seen it for sale.

    Is anyone else stockpiling toys so that their children can actually have something quality to play with? Modern toys are awful and getting worse. If these children are the future, we're in deep shit.

    1. Re:The Real Toys our children will never see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh--forgot one! Anyone remember the sets of basic rectangular shapes that were covered on all sides with close together "fingers" (they looked kind of like furry blocks from far away...). You could stick the sides of anything together any way you wanted, and go from there. I never had any of those but I pined after others' :(

  97. Click lego to enter Atollo ! by sp67 · · Score: 1

    That's what I read at the first glimpse of their home page...

    --
    Tuff that Smatters.
  98. Sodaplay - online construction game by jeti · · Score: 1

    If you like construktion games and aren't allowed to bring the Legos to your cubicle, try the Sodaconstructor.
    It is a lovely toy that let's you build walkers etc. out of springs.

  99. form over function by mj6798 · · Score: 2

    If all you care about is shape, clay is a lot more creative. If you care about function, both Lego and Atollo seem pretty boring to me. Bring back ErectorSet or give FischerTechnik a try--that's a much nicer engineering construction set.

  100. Re:Yes for Sale ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks real nice, and minimalist. Can I buy a kit from France ?

    Cheers,

    --fred

  101. Poetry by Jon+Peterson · · Score: 2

    Inspired by their web site copy...

    Once the ball is in the socket
    There are many ways to rotate the brokit
    In these two examples the brokit is locked
    Safe in the neighbouring socket slot

    Rotating a brik by 90 degrees,
    Joining two brokits becomes a breeze.
    Join them up, socket to socket,
    This is the way to make columns of brokits.
    (Hinges will also fit back to back,
    To create a double socket stack)

    --
    ----- .sig: file not found
  102. Child creativity by ectoraige · · Score: 1

    Atollo looks fun, and the regular polyhedrons would amuse a few people at my next roleplaying session.

    But for younger children, I think Lego is still a better boost to their creativity.

    For example: when a child is first given a crayon, and some paper, he'll play with it for a while. He'll discover that when he strikes the paper with the crayon, it leaves a mark. He sees a cause-and-effect and, curious, he repeats it.
    For some time, he will make random, meaningless markings, but, at some point he will draw two dots, with a line underneath, and suddenly recognise it as a face. This is hugely important to our developement, as it develops the concepts of abstraction and represention of objects and ideas.

    Herein lie the basis for writing, art, architecture, orthography, etc. The child will develop this, by drawing new faces, adding heads, limbs and whatnot, emerging with the stick-people we're all familiar with.

    Now with lego, you push a few pieces on top of each other, and, hey presto, it's a wall. Put a few walls together, and you have a building.

    The problem with K'nex, Atollo, and the like, is that it's harder to make that connection, because of all the gaps, hinges, and stickly bits.

    So I say, start a kid off with Lego, and once they start getting comfortable with that, throw the other systems at them too.

    I can't help thinking that the Atollo stuff will be picked up by chemists and biologists, much like Mindstorm is picked up by robotics people.

    Incidentally, the behaviour I mentioned about children and crayons, is played out the exact same way with Chimpanzees. The thing is, the chimpanzee never seems to recognise the face, and never progress from there.

    --
    Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
  103. Re:Yes for Sale ! by Thomas+Marsh · · Score: 1

    Scotland is also home to the deep fried mars bar.

  104. It can only get worse... by Andy_R · · Score: 2

    Can you imagine a Beowulf cluster of lame old-timer jokes?

    Drifting back to the topic...

    My favourite short-lived lego-competitor was called Capsella - anyone else remember that one?

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  105. Short and sweet by drewcifur · · Score: 1

    Constructs rocked. Especially when you had pacifist parents that wouldn't allow Trasformers and toy guns in the house. No problem...build your own.

  106. tente, for spaceships.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AS a child, the toy store near me sold 'tente', a spansih version of legos that specialized in spaceships. these things were way cool.

  107. Re:Yes for Sale ! by Chelloveck · · Score: 2
    The pieces are currently made in Scotland ! Yes, amazingly other things do come out of Scotland other than single malt !

    Hey, don't forget about IRN-BRU!

    The toys are neat, but I fear for anything that doesn't have pointy bits that look like guns. What good is making a model star ship if I can't arm it to the teeth? Mass destruction, that's what sells toys.

    The minimalist approach is also really nifty in a geek sort of way, but is it going to be a marketing hit? Even Lego seems to have lost the "generic block" approach and has gone over to making very specific pieces. Presumably this is because they can sell 10 times the number of "Bionicle" kits if you need the unique parts to make each model.

    When is Atollo going to be available in my kids' Happy Meals? :-)

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  108. pain tolerance? by zardor · · Score: 1

    Do these new blocks hurt just as much as those Lego 1x1s when you step on a floorfull of them in the dark? **ouch**

    --
    -- We don't understand software, and sometimes we don't understand hardware, but we can *see* the blinking lights
  109. Can't beat LEGO for simplicity by mblase · · Score: 2

    For all these "alternative" construction toys, nothing has ever beat LEGO. I don't think that it's necessarily because LEGO has a head-start, although that's sure an advantage for them. No, I think LEGO has the simplicity factor nailed down better than anyone else.

    I mean, come on. BRICKS. How much simpler can you get than a plain rectangular prism, except for the alphabet cubes everyone gets as babies? You stack them, they get taller, and its easy to visualize how several of them combine. Right angles and multiple planes and voila, you have a house. A little more creativity, and you have a car or a plane. And so on.

    The sets get more "multidimensional" as you progress, but that's the beauty of LEGO. They can stay simple or get increasingly complicated depending on your preferences. At one end, you have Duplo bricks; at the other, Technic Star Wars droids that you can program with MindStorms. LEGO is only as complicated as you want.

    Every other type of construction set, however, seems to promote flexibility at the expense of simplicity. Sure I can use these two pieces to build (supposedly) anything I want, but I can't really visualize how that's supposed to work. And I'm a grown adult with a talent for abstract visualization; how's a child supposed to accomplish it? Once you've built everything in the booklet you're given, you're left to your own imagination, and with these pieces I don't have any.

    I'm convinced that many of these "alternate" construction sets are purchased by teenagers and adults, people who like construction and who want to "wow" their friends and family with elaborate creations. They're supposed to be sold to children, but they don't have the visualization skills to make a dinosaur or a Formula-1 racecar with them. All they really want, upon opening the package, is to be able to build a house.

    1. Re:Can't beat LEGO for simplicity by Blue23 · · Score: 1

      These new sets are extremely cool - for us, who have possibly mastered some visualization, planning and building skills. However, for kids that just start putting blocks together, I think this won't provide them with the structure or framework they need.

      I still have all of my lego sets from when I was a kid, and they'll go on to my children. for my 30th birthday, I got a mindstorms. Exceedingly cool, but not for kids (or at least not for kids alone). I see these sort of the same way, though kids are inventive enough to have fun with whatever they have, even if it's just setting them up and dropping heavy things on them. 8)

      =Blue(23)
      "...you might be eaten by a Grue..."

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    2. Re:Can't beat LEGO for simplicity by tchapin · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. In addition, LEGO has some simple pieces that are non-brick, like wheels, axles, windshields, those little guys and their tools, etc. They are part of what makes LEGO cool, because you can place your avatar (little dudes) inside of your creations if you want. Plus, the little guys also provide you a common scale to base all of your creations around so that it is easy to have them interact.

      LEGO is great because they are simple but complex (as the person I'm replying to stated), but the complexity can come in the form of specialized pieces that enhance the model building, like not having to figure out how to build tires.

      I do think that, as stated many times by other people, the specialized piece situation has gone a bit overboard, but the concept is still a good one.

      A friend of mine bought almost all of the Star Wars LEGO sets, including the really spilly TIE Interceptor and X-Wing. They are really cool. But they didn't come with guys...

      Oh yeah, just for some reference, I started off with the first space LEGO set and "collected" for quite a while. Acutally, it was pretty cool; I lost the instructions book for that first set but was able to reconstruct it years later from a few photos in the LEGO catalogs. That's one of the beauties of LEGO.

      Todd

      --
      -- !todd erases a red dot! I steal music on the internet.
  110. Just Zoob Redux by kisrael · · Score: 2

    It looks a LOT like 'Zoob', but with a better idea for a hinge/crosspiece, and with the lego compatability. My friends who run Waltham, MA's all-construction-toy The Construction Site haven't heard of it yet, but knowing them, they probably will have it in stock as soon as it's available to general retailers.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  111. construx, robotix ain't nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    capsella was the best!!!

  112. These are using Lego Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ball joint is lifted from 70's lego Technology. If you ever had the larger lego people with hats and bendable arms, then you know what I mean. The ball joint reminds me of their head joint.

  113. Creative name.... by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

    One of the pieces is called a "brokit". I'd think if you couldn't come up with a more creative name that you'd opt for "fixit" or "bildit" or something rather than "brokit". Now whaddaya say when your little brother trashes your creation?

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  114. OT: ever tried IRN BRU ? by abde · · Score: 2


    hey, Scotland is also where you get IRN BRU - the most virulent, awesome soft drink ever.

    --
    Don't blame me - I voted for Howard Dean. http://dean2004.blogspot.com
  115. Re:Yes for Sale ! by FortKnox · · Score: 2

    Hey, any freebees to the guy that brought atollo the attention it deserves??? ;-)

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  116. Whoa! Here's an idea! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    Atollo Mindstorms!

  117. Re:What USA thinks about Bin Laden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sing that song about my ex-gf now

    Green Day rocks ;)

  118. Creativity & "new" Lego by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    "...the little lego men look really cool and all, but where's the creativity? Unless you have serious cash to drop on the Mindstorms, the sets are so specialized that you can only make one thing out of them."

    Ah, the old "nowadays Lego has too many specialized pieces" complaint. In a few cases justified, but doesn't anybody remember what their early Lego creations looked like? I'll answer that: "crap". Yes, they looked like crap. The basic rectangular bricks are versatile, but if you are trying to make more sophisticated creations or "model-quality" recreations of actual vehicles or buildings, they're not sufficient. Even as a kid I *loved* all the specialized pieces, because without them you couldn't build a Cylon raider or an X-wing fighter or a dump truck that actually dumped. If you're still unconvinced see Brickshelf to see how creative one can be with the "single-use" parts.
    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:Creativity & "new" Lego by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • if you are trying to make more sophisticated creations [square bricks] are not sufficient. Even as a kid I *loved* all the specialized pieces, because without them you couldn't build a Cylon raider or an X-wing fighter

      The difference being that in the olden days, you had to figure out how to do it, you had to search for solutions. Now you open the box, and bingo, there's your (Star Wars(tm) X(tm)-Wing(tm))(tm). Why bother buying a LEGO one?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  119. What About OS X? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac OS X is based on FreeBSD remember. Why did you ignore it? it's clearly one of the most successful desktop UNIXes right now, and with 10.1 about to come out, it will see even more widespread adoption.

    Maybe you ignored it because IT BLOWS A BIG GIANT HOLE THROUGH YOUR WEAK ARGUEMENT!

  120. Meccano can't beat Lego.. No way.. by tridim · · Score: 1

    http://home14.inet.tele.dk/rolighed/

  121. Inexpensive! by Hot+Soup+LD · · Score: 1

    $25 for a 240 piece set? I've always been a fan of legos, but they were always really expensive. I think at this price, I could buy more Atollo than I'd ever need for fifty bucks.

    My lego collection has to be at least a couple hundred dollars worth...

    --
    Hot Soup - Lethal Doses
  122. Zome Tools by MythoBeast · · Score: 2

    I've always loved this kind of thing, from Lincoln Logs to the old erector sets with the metal girders that you could slice your fingers open with.

    Another one in that market that most people don't know about is ZomeTools. I've used these things to model molecules, build small pieces of furniture, explain 4d geometry, and decorate my party spaces with cool sculpture.

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  123. To complex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, the thing that made Legos so much fun while I was growing up was/is their simplicity. This block snaps to that block and that's it. You had to use your imagination to build from very simple, standard shapes, something complex and neat. Plus, has anyone considered the relatively cheap quality of these parts? These things and the other stuff like them seem flimsy to me. I built a stepladder with my Legos and they keep on goin. These things are so complicated you'd have to be a middle aged geek to get anything out of them anyways. I'll never trade in my Legos...

  124. Does Slashdot get a Royalty? by Gools · · Score: 1

    The following has now been posted on their front page:

    "20th September 2001

    Due to unprecedented demand from the posting on www.slashdot.org our systems have been inundated with orders and enquiries. We are a relatively small company with limited resources, but we will endeavor to satisfy the demand ! And we are very encouraged by the feedback and response to ATOLLO, thank you."

    --
    "The victory of arms leaves the issues where they were." Chomsky
  125. my need by mrsmalkav · · Score: 1

    it is great! Wow. This seems like it would make those science projects when we were kids where we used styrofoam balls and toothpicks really really elementary (ba dum dum). They look awesome! With just two pieces though, it seems like it would be really complicated for just a kid to make something. Though it also seems like it would be an easy way to sit there with pieces and just come up with something. To make the geometric shapes like on their site would require lots of pre-planning...

    But they're LEGO COMPATIBLE!! werd b00ty. The combinations are limitless...

    I'm gonna go buy some this weekend and see what they'll do with mindstorms :)

    -lisa

  126. Desktop Toy by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    These would make a good desktop toy for the office. Just have a bowl with a couple hundred of these guys in it. Great ice-breaker too... like a geeks way of bonding.

  127. construx by nonsense66 · · Score: 1

    construx were great, i still use mine

  128. Re:Yes for Sale ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    send mail to info@atollo.com,
    prove your fort knox,
    and we'll get some to you.

  129. Wow! Atollo sent me a free set! by Jabez2 · · Score: 1

    Just 'cos I e-mailed them to ask about UK availability, they sent me the 24-piece Acrobot set! I've played with it some, and it's really clever; all those degrees of freedom make Lego look dull.

    Having only two pieces is like assembly language all over again. Guess I have the xmas presents for f&f sorted now...