Slashdot Mirror


Info on the New iPAQ H3800

Jason Dunn sent us to a link on his site about the new new iPaq which is due out relatively soon. Aesthetic changes, more memory, and I assume Linux will run on it as well or better then the existing models.

130 comments

  1. close, but no cigar... by turbine216 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    sorry, compaq...it's nice, but until it's got bluetooth and some kind of wireless connectivity (built-in CDMA phone capabilities???), I'm not gonna shell out the $400+ you're asking.

    I'll stick with my Palm V for now...

    1. Re:close, but no cigar... by onion2k · · Score: 3, Informative

      Point 1: Bluetooth IS wireless connectivity.

      Point 2: The new iPaq has bluetooth.

      RTFA.

    2. Re:close, but no cigar... by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      It's got bluetooth...

      As for wireless, hell, if you wanna shell out the service charges I'm sure that there will be a card for it soon.

    3. Re:close, but no cigar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, smart guy...the bluetooth functionality is NOT included with the PDA...it's SEPARATE. If you would have READ MY FUCKING POST, you would have seen that i did not include the word "optional"...rather, i used the phrase "built-in".

      i believe i've said enough.

    4. Re:close, but no cigar... by thetechweenie · · Score: 1

      Uh... What about a CDPD PCMCIA modem. It works like a charm. I love the IPAQ, and with the CDPD card, and a citrix server, I can run any app from anywhere...

      --


      Um, this is my sig.
    5. Re:close, but no cigar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bluetooth is worthless. 802.11b would be better.
      and the cellular crack is just plain funny.

      you must bitch because your toaster doesn't play DVD's.

    6. Re:close, but no cigar... by gsoli · · Score: 1

      Um, bluetooth (or 802.15) is WPAN. Good for wirelessly connecting devices to your iPaq. Not good for wirelessly connecting your iPaq to a high speed network as you walk around your building or campus.

      WLAN.

    7. Re:close, but no cigar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how ya doin', ass-fucker.

      Once more, the pda DOES NOT HAVE BUILT-IN WIRELESS OR BLUETOOTH. BOTH ARE SUPPORTED, NEITHER IS STANDARD.

      Now YOU read the fucking manual.

    8. Re:close, but no cigar... by pigeonhk · · Score: 1

      I'll say it really depends on what you want to do with the device. A PDA is a PDA, and it acts as a PDA pretty well I can imagine.

      I have an iPAQ running Linux and the point is a I want some kind of mobile device that run Linux and technically I can run anything on it and that means I can run anything anywhere.

      --
      If you have the source, you have the whole world...
  2. Bluetooth for $750, PCMCIA $150, 802.11 $100 by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    Gee, that sure sounds like a thousand dollar pda to me. But why do you want both bluebooth AND wireless connectivity??
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    1. Re:Bluetooth for $750, PCMCIA $150, 802.11 $100 by turbine216 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      picture this...

      a PDA that takes ALSO functions as my mobile phone. I've been longing for it for years. The bluetooth functionality, while not necessary, would allow me to use a wireless headset or earpiece...much better than the current hybrid PDA/cell phones, which basically force you to hold the freakin' PDA up to your face (generally not very accomodating).

      The wireless capability would not necessarily have to be 802.11...it could be 3G wireless CDMA or something of that nature. I'm looking for TOTAL voice/data connection, in a fully mobile environment.

    2. Re:Bluetooth for $750, PCMCIA $150, 802.11 $100 by CodeMonky · · Score: 2

      Cisco has this sorta.
      They've gotten an ipaq with a wireless network card to act as a phone on a VOIP networkby loading some software on the ipaq (duh).

      --
      --"Karma is justice without the satisfaction"
    3. Re:Bluetooth for $750, PCMCIA $150, 802.11 $100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, your dreams have been answered: http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=23 66

  3. A tad too much? by smaughster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A very cool tool, but looking at the specs, I got the feeling that everything has been added because it can, not because it could be useful for a PDA. I mean: a 5 button joystick interface? If they would have integrate cell-phone functionality, then this would really rock. Anyone got any ideas on how long such a battery will last without recharging?

    --
    I intend to live forever, so far so good.
    1. Re:A tad too much? by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, trust me, you really *do* want 64MB ram and 32MB flash. By the time you put Linux in a 16MB flash, you only have 2MB left for applications.

      And the 5 button joypad is needed to play gsoko.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:A tad too much? by larien · · Score: 3, Informative
      The 32MB flash is a requirement for Pocket PC 2002; you can fit it on an iPaq 3630/3660, but if you do, you have to install the Media player and some other software into the RAM.

      Personally, I'm finding the 32MB RAM in my 3630 adequate for my needs; I'm not using it to lug around dozens of images or large documents, after all! Remember, even new-ish Palms only have around 8MB, although I imagine that Palm apps must be smaller.

      As for the joystick, I only use it for qtris :)

    3. Re:A tad too much? by boanerges · · Score: 1

      5-button joystick is too much? No way it is too little! At least for playing games it is. I have had an Ipaq for a year and it has had the 5-button pad all this time. They should increase it to a 9 button pad!

    4. Re:A tad too much? by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 1

      A GSM/GPRS sleeve is available and will provide full cell phone capability in addition to packet data. This means that you can be always on the Internet. Also you are billed for the data transfered, not the time. Most operators will charge a typical bucket of bits, e.g., $10 for 10Megbytes/month.
      I tell you this device kicks ass.
      GSM = Global System for Mobiles
      GPRS = General Packet Radio Service

    5. Re:A tad too much? by plumby · · Score: 1

      Too right. Commando on Ipaq Mame is unplayable. You can't run and fire at the same time :-(

  4. then what's the "bluetooth status indicator" light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (no body)

  5. 802.11 Biznatch by gsoli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, I would definitely love to see some 802.11b in there, especially now that they have the technology down to the size of a CF card. BUT... it's a bit understandable, since 802.11a products are coming out (supposedly) this winter. It makes sense for Compaq to wait until 802.11a technology is small enough to fit in an iPaq PocketPC. There are many enterprises waiting for the 5GHz stuff to come out. At any rate, why do we have to always wait for the cool stuff!?!?!

    1. Re:802.11 Biznatch by DeathBunny · · Score: 2

      If you don't mind making your IPaq quite a bit bigger, you can get a piggyback module that accepts PCMCIA cards. One of the guys I work with has a PCMCIA 802.11b network card on his IPaq. It's pretty cool. He can roam around the office and still get e-mail, surf, whatever.

    2. Re:802.11 Biznatch by fcrick · · Score: 1

      Yeah at Microsoft they all run around with iPaq's with 802.11 (1X even!)...direct their powerpoint presentations remotely and e-mail and voice-mail or whatever...

      Pretty nifty till you leave the building...what they need is either bluetooth on both iPaq and your cell, or a cellphone inside the iPaq instead of 802.11...

      --
      Your signatures belong to me.
    3. Re:802.11 Biznatch by shaka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out The Gismo, an addon for the iPaq which provides you with GSM, GPRS and WLAN (802.11b).
      Oh, and did I mention it's developed by my company?

      --
      :wq!
  6. Runs QNX as well? by Leif_Bloomquist · · Score: 4, Informative

    Presumably, QNX will run on these as well? I guess if you can install Linux, QNX will go on as well. Hopefully the QNX install process with be easier than the Linux one.

  7. Never assume... (and other comments) by Uttles · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... because it makes an ass out of "u" and me.
    Seriously though, why do you assume it will be designed to run Linux better? I'm just curious as I read the information and all it mentioned was Windows.

    Also, I don't like this spec:
    The H3800 Series combines USB, serial, and power into a single connector. Earlier H3000 Series Pocket PCs have separate USB/Serial and power connectors.
    Doesn't that defeat the purpose of the UNIVERSAL serial bus? I thought the great thing about USB is that as long as you have a USB port you can plug in any USB device. Now you have to make sure you have their special connector to access the USB port...

    Otherwise, it looks pretty cool, if it does run Linux well I may have to get one!

    --

    ~ now you know
    1. Re:Never assume... (and other comments) by MassacrE · · Score: 1

      Its a slave USB device anyways, though. What would you connect it to besides your PC?

    2. Re:Never assume... (and other comments) by Uttles · · Score: 1

      well, that's a good observation, but it's just the principle of the matter that I was concerned with. USB was designed so that it makes no difference what you connect it to... even if 99% of the time you're connecting it to a PC

      --

      ~ now you know
    3. Re:Never assume... (and other comments) by Drakino · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most digital cameras, and MP3 players don't use a standard USB connector on the device side either, due to it not being small enough. It's always a standard USB plug on the other side though, so it's not a big issue. The iPaq has that one connector on the bottom that gets split out into power and USB, or power and Serial depending on what cradle you use. (Or you can hack the USB cradle to have all three).

    4. Re:Never assume... (and other comments) by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "real" phrase is "never make assumptions. it makes an ass out of you and mumptions.

      Ok, its a joke from some B movie. NO ONE SAID I HAD TO BE FUNNY.

    5. Re:Never assume... (and other comments) by uradu · · Score: 2

      The fact still remains that a USB B socket is rather fattish for a slender PDA. And so far it doesn't seem that a smaller B connector analogous to the 4-wire 1394 connector is emerging for USB, although that might be a GOOD THING in the long run. Many device manufacturers can't let go of the desire to also make some side money with proprietary cables.

    6. Re:Never assume... (and other comments) by dinivin · · Score: 1

      The Long Kiss Goodnight us hardly a B movie :-)

      Dinivin

    7. Re:Never assume... (and other comments) by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Thanks for the heads up!

  8. PDA: TNG? by wiredog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wired has an article on what Palm might be up to with Be. Interesting in light of this story.

    1. Re:PDA: TNG? by uradu · · Score: 2

      They either could be up to something, or be performing their traditional organizational shuffle. Palm is the quintessential example of a company that saw a good thing and tried to run with it--but stood still just long enough for their feet to be firmly implanted in drying concrete. The Be acquisition could either be a sign of great things to come, or of aimless buying. I guess time will tell.

    2. Re:PDA: TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article is "Score:4, Insightful" ?! It's just yet another article that basically says "wouldn't be cool if company X did this and that, and I can confirm how cool and plausible it would be because they just licensed technologies Y and Z. Furthermore, just imagine these scenarios: usefulComputingScenario1, usefulComputingScenario2, usefulComputingScenario3..."
      I could just write a script that generates these articles on a daily basis by monitoring aquisitions and licensing deals.

    3. Re:PDA: TNG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the article assumes there is intelligent life at Palm. To date, the Palm drones led by Yankerkowski and his $667,000 compensation (which was never cut) leads me to conclude there is no intelligent life. Only automatons screaming: "The ZEN OF PALM" or "We HAVE 20,000 calculator APPS!!!" or other inane mantras.

  9. The Illustration is all hosed. by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Redundant

    If you look at the descriptions, One illustration lists the hole on the upper left (correctly) as the earphone jack, the other lists it as the Bluetooth status indicator. And the '5 way' joystick is listed at the voice recorder button. (And what should be the voice recorder button is incorrectly listed as the ambient light sensor.)

    Looks like somebody was a little rushed to print.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:The Illustration is all hosed. by mach-5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Each position in the list is off by one, add one to the list item to get the proper number in the image.

  10. Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a proud owner of a Cassiopeia E-100, the first colour handheld ever. It's aging quite nicely -- the processor is only 133 MHz, but that's MIPS and not this cheap-slow-crunches-x86-code-easily StrongARM BS that looks nice on benchmarks but can't feed graphics to save its life. The problem is that the E-100 is stuck in time, there's not really much development going on for Windows CE 2.11 and the developers who used to give us a hand-me-down build when compiling for 3.0 usually just blow us off entirely. Some of the new graphics APIs, which don't really have a parellel in Pocket Linux are very swift and are allowing handhelds to really blow up the market with features like full motion video, great VNC support, and really bitchin' audio interfaces.

    What, say those of you still stuck in the dark ages of the "i can do anything a pencil and paper can do, only 500 times more expensive" PalmOS, why would you want motion video? Well, because it's terribly useful for making a lot of the things you want a palmtop for more descriptive. Take, for example, the latest topographical software that comes with TopoUSA (a maptech product I think). It can display a 3d gradient of an area. Not too useful? I beg to differ. There have been a number of times up in the 'dacks where I've bivouaced up a mountain and come down on the totally wrong side. I can't read contour lines for shit, because I don't have a degree in geography. With the isometric view that this topo software provides, i could just input the direction i was facing, and scroll until the terrain matched what I was seeing (no, GPS wouldn't be useful here, because it would be at least ten meters off...and in a land of overgrown trails and thousand foot cliffs, ten meters is a lot). There are lots of other uses for a decent graphics API, too, such as video conferencing and web browsing.

    However, this new iPaq still has the same crummy 12 bit downsampled (meaning that the proc takes time to shave off the extra 4 bits) screen as its predessors. So while the processor is faster, the display (which is the biggest bottleneck, pocketpcpassion.com had a benchmark showing that even the E-100 could beat the 32 meg iPaq to the screen using the old graphics APIs) is slow as it ever was. Kind of a shame, considering all the features...like putting a big engine, big gas tank, great stereo, leather seats, GPS and handheld telephone into a nice little lightweight chassis, and then gearing it for torque.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
    1. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by Subliminal+Fusion · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not exactly true (at least if what I've heard is correct)

      http://www.wincecity.com/articles/2001/9/2001-9-19 -Compaq-Readying-New.html

      "The other device will join the H3800 line of handhelds. In addition to 64 MB of RAM this high end device will feature a Secure-Digital slot and an active matrix screen that supports 65,536 colors. One feature of the high end device that really intrigues me is that this device is expected to feature voice-command and voice-control software. The possibility of using speech to control a PDA will be a great addition."

      The 12-bit color is a slight turn-off, but the form factor of the ipaq has always killed the casiopeia, plus the ROM on the ipaq is upgradable (probably the biggest selling point for me as I have 2 pretty much obsolite CE 2.x devices).

    2. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by hattig · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's aging quite nicely -- the processor is only 133 MHz, but that's MIPS and not this cheap-slow-crunches-x86-code-easily StrongARM BS that looks nice on benchmarks but can't feed graphics to save its life

      Erm, the StrongARM is not x86. It is ARM, an extremely nice and powerful RISC ISA. Typically graphics performance will depend on what graphics chip is used in a device, and how much 2D accelleration it has. I bet that a 206MHz StrongARM (old technology now as well) can crush a 133MHz embedded MIPs processor any day of the week...

      The more pertinent question is: when will the iPaq and other devices start to use the even faster and lower power XScale processors that are ARM compatible?

    3. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by boanerges · · Score: 1

      Everything I am reading on the new Ipaq says that it will be 16 bit NOT 12bit where are you getting that information?

    4. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      However, this new iPaq still has the same crummy 12 bit downsampled (meaning that the proc takes time to shave off the extra 4 bits) screen as its predessors

      No, internally the graphics are 16-bit. The display can only display 12-bit however. The display automatically turns the 16-bit output into the 12-bit display - no processor time used at all, nor any graphics chip time either. The point is that the iPaq's graphics chip is not as good as the one in the E100, in that the E100's can do more accellerated actions. Or that WinCE2.11 is faster at graphics that PocketPC.

    5. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by alhaz · · Score: 2

      It's aging quite nicely -- the processor is only 133 MHz, but that's MIPS and not this cheap-slow-crunches-x86-code-easily StrongARM BS

      Where did you get the impression that a StrongARM crunches x86 code at all? It can only execute ARMv4 code.

      I can personally guarantee that a 206mhz SA1110 runs circles around a 133mhz NEC Vr processor.

      The Casio may have a quicker LCD controller, but you definately get a lot more work done per Mhz on an ARMv4 cpu than a MIPSv4 cpu. I work with both archetectures all the time.

      However, this new iPaq still has the same crummy 12 bit downsampled (meaning that the proc takes time to shave off the extra 4 bits) screen as its predessors.

      What do you mean? The SA1110 lcd controller is addressable as a 16 bit display for convenience, but the LCD itself is only capable of displaying 12 bits. Just like your casio.

      Best I can guess, you're either a moron, or a troll, or someone who paid a lot of money for a cheezy mips handheld who has to then attack everything else in existance in order ot defend his expenditure.

      --
      This is just like television, only you can see much further.
    6. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by alhaz · · Score: 2

      The more pertinent question is: when will the iPaq and other devices start to use the even faster and lower power XScale processors that are ARM compatible?

      The XScale is much faster, but is not lower power (Actually draws much more power) and it is not designed for use in handhelds.

      For starters, it runs hot. StrongARM cpus do not.

      Then there's the matter of it not having integrated peripherals like a StrongARM.

      Oh, and did i mention that the XScale is not yet ready for primetime? Nobody seems to have an OS running stable on it yet.

      --
      This is just like television, only you can see much further.
    7. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      A GPS is only accurate to 10 meters? Have you actually ever used a GPS, much less one that also has an external antenna? A good map of any kind can help, but a GPS (even a cheap one) does not have to be an inaccurate device, and can be simply much quicker and easier.

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    8. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xscale uses less power too and the ipaq's of the 3800 series designation have 16bit screens read the articles before spouting crap. And some of the 3800 series have bluetooth. And its got a bigger 1400mah battery. READ THE F*CKING ARTICLE before spreading misinformation

    9. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah and xscale is strongarm. It just has better power consumption, more instructions, but yes you were right there not ready yet. i've heard q1 2002 from intels press releases and such. damn man read shit before spouting your mouth off like an ass.

    10. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by alhaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      oh yeah and xscale is strongarm. It just has better power consumption, more instructions, but yes you were right there not ready yet. i've heard q1 2002 from intels press releases and such. damn man read shit before spouting your mouth off like an ass.

      The XScale is lower *voltage, but that does not mean it is lower *power.

      The XScale is SIMILAR internally to a strongarm but it is NOT a strongarm. It does NOT have integrated io & periopherals like a strongarm and it's companion io chipset has things in it that are INSANE for palm style devices, like a friggin PCI bus!

      For pete's sake, man, the 80310 evaluation board runs at an ambient temperature of 60c, and rquires heatsinks if the temperature inside the case rises above 90c! A strongarm runs COLD. It needs fewer VOLTS but it's dissipating more WATTS of power as HEAT than the SA1110 even draws!

      The SA1110 is perfect for palm-type devices because it has integrated USB, integrated serial, integrated LCD controller, integrated sound, integrated pcmcia, and a bunch of other bits & pieces that the XScale does NOT have. And neither does the IO companion chip. When you get all those components on a board together, it's going to need a LOT more juice than a little bubblegum stick of lithium polymer is going to put out.

      You will probably see XScale cpus in hand held data terminals, mini-notebooks, and that ilk, but you're never going to see it in something like an ipaq. Get over the hype already. Even though there's a picture of a handheld in the marketing literature, it was designed for other applications.

      --
      This is just like television, only you can see much further.
    11. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://developer.intel.com/design/intelxscale/benc hmarks.htm?iid=xscale+leftnav&

      Thats a very good graph showing power dissipation.

      http://www.crn.com/sections/news/top_news.asp?Ar ti cleID=23770

      The xscale will be used in pocket pc's and it does use the main basic instructions of the strong arm processors. It will of course have extra enhancements that help it like the pentiums they get mmx and sse. I'm not saying the xscale processors are going to have mmx or sse but they will have instructins that will speed up things like they do. Microsoft has already stated that future pocket pc's will only run on strong arm processors. Read some pda sites its pretty common knowledge that xscale processors WILL be going into pda's in the future. The ipaq for sure.

    12. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      Acutally, turns out my 10 meters was liberal wishful thinking. Here's the straight poop from Garmin's website and FAQ:

      "With the end of Selective Availability, you can expect horizontal accuracy of 20m to 35m (60' to 105') for older 8 channel units and 7m to 15m (21' to 45') for newer 12 parallel channel units in good reception conditions. For altitude you can expect accuracy to range from +/- 75m (225') for an 8 channel unit and +/- 35m (105') for 12 parallel channel units in good reception conditions. There are a number of environmental conditions that can effect GPS accuracy due to varying satellite signal reception conditions and can therefore lead to better or worse accuracy's than listed above. The satellite status page on most GARMIN GPS units will provide a real-time estimate of the relative accuracy of the position reported by the GPS receiver. "

      So that's accurate within 7 meters if you have a good GPS (fucking expensive) and something more like 25m if you have a regular one. You call that accurate? When trying to find a three foot wide path in a heavily wooded area, knowing that I have between 49 and 625 square feet between where the device says I am and where I actually am is little comfort. In face, it's more what we in the software industry call "fucking useless."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    13. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

      It does say exactly where you are. It doesn't have as many significant figures as you seem to want but that does NOT make it inaccurate, just not as high-resolution.

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    14. Re:Moans for casio...where's the decent graphics? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      Ok, this is useless. Stephen Wright has a joke about an existential map at a department store that said 'You are Here' all over it, and for our purposes "low resolution" is about the same. 30 meters is a lot...hell, 10 meters is a lot...and i'd much rather rely on my eye and a reference object than a measurement that tells me when I'm in a "zone".

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  11. Re:This isn't a troll, just a question... by larien · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Never crashes? Dunno about Pocket PC 2002, but I've seen an iPaq 3630 get hosed with itself such that I couldn't start up Contacts. A soft reset cured that, though (i.e. a reboot).

    As for why use linux, well:

    • Because you can. Some people will try and run linux on everything that has a CPU and RAM. :) It's a geek thing, I think...
    • Custom uses; here you have nicely packaged hardware with a reasonable amount of RAM (go back 2-3 years and 64MB was a privilege!); I'm sure you could develop some good custom utilities that require portability (e.g. stock inventories in a warehouse). Using linux allows a custom kernel to be deployed making such tools more efficient (hopefully!) and/or making integration with an existing linux/Unix infrastructure easier. That said, many tools could simply be deployed as Pocket PC apps.
    Your point about being custom made is good, though. I bought mine as a PDA, not as a mobile computing platform. All I need is something to sync up contacts and calender info and the ability to browse the web using IR and a GSM phone. Pocket PC 3.0 lets me do this quite happily with Outhouse (not my choice; company standard) at work.
  12. Battery life... by fcrick · · Score: 1

    Its probably is on the same scale as normal iPaqs...

    Mine lasts about 4-6 hours without the backlight ever on, and that goes down to 2-3 with it and depending if I'm using proc intensive stuff...

    Need a lot more if its gonna be a cell phone, though the expansions do come with more batteries...

    --
    Your signatures belong to me.
    1. Re:Battery life... by Drakino · · Score: 5, Informative

      Battery capacity in the new iPaq is higher (1400 mAh compaired to I believe 900 in the older iPaqs.)

      Also, I saw over on Brighthand.coms fourms that someone offers a battery replacement service for the iPaq. One was with a 2100mAh battery.

      Honestly though, on my iPaq 3630, the battery life has been fine. It sits in it's cradle and charges while I sync it. Wasn't a huge deal when I traveled either. Brought the AC adaptor (instead of extra batteries), and just plugged it in when I got the battery warning after about 3-5 days. I was doing the same for my cell phone, so whats the difference?

    2. Re:Battery life... by Klaruz · · Score: 2

      I agree, why do some pdas still use regular batts? Take a hint from the cell phone industry, put a high power batt in, and provide a charger. It works great for my motorolla timeport/startac phone. I just plug it in when I get home, or whip out the charger when I'm at a hotel, it's small and fits in my bags easily. The batts last about 2-3 days with moderate talk time usage. Seems like that's about the same length of time a pda lasts. Compared to a pda my cell phone probobly sucks batts like no tomorrow, but I rarely have a problem with it going dead.

  13. sad :-( by mach-5 · · Score: 1

    It's got more RAM and processor power than my primary PC, Pentium 100 with 32 MB. Yeah, I live in the dark ages, but it works great under Linux, just not X.

  14. Contour maps by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can't read contour lines for shit, because I don't have a degree in geography

    Wow! I didn't realize that my 8 weeks in Army Basic Training qualified me for a degree in geography!

    Seriously, it just takes practice to learn map reading. A lensatic compass helps alot. Up in the mountains is not the place to learn, do it in the foothills. The big advantages of a map and a compass for hiking is that they don't require batteries, and you can drop them without breaking them.

  15. Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these... by mfarah · · Score: 1

    ... or, considering the iPaq's size, maybe it should be a Gollum cluster of these. ;->

    --
    "Trust me - I know what I'm doing."
    - Sledge Hammer
  16. Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone tried to find a fucking JOB lately! May all employers spontaneously combust!

    1. Re:Offtopic by GTRacer · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      But, but, with all the employers vapourised, where are you going to find a job?

      Huh, smart guy?

      GTRacer
      - Thinks Vib Ribbon is hella cool

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    2. Re:Offtopic by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      Damn, tough room!

      Offtopic? He started it! My reply was on-topic to its parent, y'know!

      Geez, this and my Nelson crack (which *WAS* on-topic, BTW) on the "XBox delayed" thread have cost me dearly...

      GTRacer
      - Guesses this will be Strike 3!

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  17. Seems redundant with the new HP by Darlington · · Score: 1
    This model seems extremely similar, perhaps slightly inferior, to the new HP Jornada 560 series, which is due out October 4 (only a week away!)

    In light of the HP/Compaq merger, it seems likely that at least one of these products will either never see the light of day or will be killed in short order. (I vote for croaking the iPaq.)

    1. Re:Seems redundant with the new HP by Coniine · · Score: 1

      Are schematics and chip specs available for the HP product?

      I'm not going to buy a handheld that I can't work on as I choose.

    2. Re:Seems redundant with the new HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because you are a nerd-boy dork. Unless they pack in custom asics (and they don't), then of course there are chip specs.

      You are a fucking moron.

  18. Re:Offtopic (JOB) by adewolf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah, I live in the San Diego area and have been a UNIX sys admin for 15years. I lost my job of 3 months in the 1st week of Aug 2001 and I still have not found anything, WTF.

    --
    "The Brady Bunch is back...working homicide"
  19. still have to pay Microsoft though, don't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Can you get it with Linux pre-installed; or no operating
    system? I'm not buying one of these things until it is possible
    to get one without giving money to Microsoft.

    1. Re:still have to pay Microsoft though, don't you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the linux distro for it isnt quite done yet and either way it was made to run pocketpc (hence the name). There are 2 or 3 linux pdas available and theone i had (agenda) was nowhere near to be done. It ran very very slow and hwr was non existant

  20. hmm by forgoil · · Score: 1

    No XScale, no BT as standard. I guess the other rumours were untrue. I wonder when they will come with MPEG1/2/4 decoders as standard;)

  21. XScale? by mojo-raisin · · Score: 1

    So, I thought we'd be seeing the amazing new Xscale interation of Arm in handhelds by now.

    Hasn't the chip been out for a little while, and isn't it supposed to be a lot faster/or have much longer batter life?

    1. Re:XScale? by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1

      XScale is intel speak for StrongARM....
      it means, we want to look like we made
      this our selves rathar than just buying
      the plans off somebody else.

      Mainly cause intel have problems keep
      there chip power consumption down. XScale
      is a OEM rebranding of ARM (with some
      minor tweaks)....

      Of course, every ARM chip is really OEM
      with some minor tweaks, since ARM don't
      make silicon............

      Now I remember ARM when it stood for
      Acorn Risc Machine...probably the first
      Desktop machine containing a Risc process,
      no matter what Apple('s marketing dept falsely) claims.

      Must admit, an ARM powered PDA is cool, but
      I really want to get a Cerf cube...

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
  22. I played around with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am working in a Project which uses loads of iPaqs, thats why Compaq invited me and my project collegues to their stand at the Swiss Orbit-Expo on Thuesday to get a demo of the new iPaq. (They told us that there are only 3 of those iPaqs in europe, and I guess they had to, since this was a VIP event :)

    Here is what I found:
    First off the new design is really cute, and the integrated card slot is also very practical, which brings me to the first negative point. Why did they introduce a new card format? (I mean besides the cash, and probably license fees they will get)
    The screen hasn't improved much as far as I could see, but as you may know, the screen was already very sharp and very bright, actually one of the best screens on PDAs over all.
    The new MS OS running on that iPaq was all smooth and anti-aliased, kept in the typical XP style, which itself is of course kept really close to the OS X aqua GUI ;)
    I had the impression that the overall system speed has also somewhat improved.

    What they didn't fix is the fact that the iPaq still does a factory reset when power goes out. Just like a Palm, but my Palm runs over 5 weeks before he does so. And also the iPaq doesn't turn the screen of, say 10 minutes in advance, which would save the RAM contents for some days I guess. OTOH they did include 32 MB of ROM, which makes is possible to install more apps in the ROM.

    The GPRS-Tri-Band jacket which is also brand new, looks like a really nice thing to have if you travel a lot, it gives you "gsm connectivity in virtually any gsm networks on this planet" according to compaq. I think this is pretty much the case, except for some African Networks. Only the price was relatively high, it costs about 550 $ (850.- SFr).
    You use it on the back side, there are integrated mics and speakers on there. This makes sense if you don't need to know how your ears look when pressed upon a glass surface. And of course you would hit buttons on the touchscreen while phoning.

    They also made a little but vital change to the pen, its now completly round so can put it in either way, unlike with the current models where putting the pen in the wrong way can result in a pen stuck in an iPaq.

    Oh, yeah, almost forgot, they have really good coffee and croisants at their stand.

    1. Re:I played around with this... by dan.fitzgerald · · Score: 2, Informative
      Regarding the following:
      "Why did they introduce a new card format? (I mean besides the cash, and probably license fees they will get)"
      I think the SD card format is:
      1. not new, does not the Palm m50x have this?
      2. not a Compaq prop. technology (see above)
      Lastly, IMHO the SD cards are nice and small, allowing greater flexibility in device design without form factor restrictions inherent in the CF or PC Card specifications. [One day I hope to be able to plug one of thier (SD cards) predecessors directly into me!]
      --
      Dan FitzGerald Network Analyst and Wannabe Hacker KC0CZM (2m & 440 in NJ)
    2. Re:I played around with this... by plumby · · Score: 1

      What they didn't fix is the fact that the iPaq still does a factory reset when power goes out.

      The power died on mine today (I left it on my desk, and I think something was pressing on one of the buttons). I plugged it into a power supply, and it was still OK. No factory reset. How long does it need to be totally without power to do this?

    3. Re:I played around with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mine restarts when i foget to charge it up (doh this reminds me...)but you need to wait till it wont even turn on. And about the palm thing, it only last about 12-14 hrs with continous use, that palm claims that it lasts moneth with the batteries are BS, they say its with normal daily use

    4. Re:I played around with this... by plumby · · Score: 1

      mine restarts when i foget to charge it up (doh this reminds me...)but you need to wait till it wont even turn on.

      It wouldn't turn on all day. There was absolutely no sign of life. I discovered it dead at about 8am, and didn't get it to a power supply until about 8pm.

    5. Re:I played around with this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right there. This is the consortium which is responsible for those SD Cards. Thanks for correcting me.

  23. No real improvements by nr · · Score: 0

    Not to rain on somebodys parade but I did expect some CPU and memory improvements for the next model, like at least >400 MHz and 128 MB ram.

  24. Open Platform by Coniine · · Score: 1

    I've always considered the availability of specs for the HW the best point of the iPaqs. Being able to review the hardware and port whatever OS you might choose is very encouraging. It looks to me like one of the best opportunities to have a truly secure system.

    That's right, I don't necessarily trust the average motherboard to not have a keylogger built in.

  25. Re:Don't Tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blah blah you're gay

  26. "Secure Data" nonsense? by lilo · · Score: 1
    Hmmmm. That's that card format that is designed to protect copyrighted content. I'm sure RAM under SD format is just as free as RAM under any other format, but on the whole, I think I'd rather not encourage these people.

    No H3800 for me, thanks.

  27. The word is THAN! by Red+Rocket · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hey CmdrTaco. Do you understand that you write for one of the most widely read sites on the Internet? Don't you think you should learn to write english or just use your native language?
    Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than Then Than

    --
    - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  28. What about the games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did not see any indication that they fixed the serial button interface. I want to play arcade style games without the fuss of one key press at a time. (Yes, I do work too, but darn it, fix the serial interface.)

    1. Re:What about the games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Compaq engineers, it's not broken. It works exactly as designed. The design is stupid and wrong, but it does work as designed.

  29. Get Some Perspective : Re:No real improvements by Coniine · · Score: 1

    >400MHz? 128MB?

    Better make that battery a bit thicker. You know I still, compile, browse and do my e-mail on a 233MHz/64MB Thinkpad - I'd say the little iPAQ is still pretty hot even though it may not be a multimedia monster.

    I've been having this sneaking suspicion lately that unless you're into video you just don't need the processing power of a 1 or 2 GHz CPU or the wide open spaces that 1 GB of RAM presents. ( My kids have machines like that.) I think what we need now is imagination and interesting and clever ideas to use what we have.

    All I have is a $.03.

    My penny change, please.

    If ya ain't got change I'll take /. karma instead.

  30. 3 models by ryanr · · Score: 2

    Actually, if you click on the "buy it today" link in the article, it looks like there are 3 models to choose from, including one w/64K colors, and one w/64K colors and bluetooth.

    http://www.pocketpcfanatic.com/compaq.asp?REFERER= 84348

    (Note, the referer ID belongs to the pocketpcthoughts guy, not me.)

  31. don't buy an iPaq for Linux by mj6798 · · Score: 3, Informative
    The iPaqs make nice Linux machines, but the business divisions of Compaq just don't support this. The installation process is a lot of work and you may end up having to send the iPaq back to the factory to be restored. And as long as people keep buying the things with WinCE preinstalled, why should they bother?

    If you want Linux on a PDA, why not buy a Linux PDA? The Agenda VR is a decent, very compact Linux PDA, and there are several others. And HP has announced a Jornada based on Linux.

    1. Re:don't buy an iPaq for Linux by fitsnips · · Score: 1

      Some problems I had with the Agenda VR3.

      1. I need rechargeable in the cradle, I tried rechargeable batteries and they just did not cut it.
      2. Color you really want color in a pda these days.
      3. The Compaq Flash adapter for IPAQ just rules, then there is the pcmcia adapter no way to do this
      with the VR3

      I had the developer version of the VR3 and sold it, just could not stand these short falls, but as a base
      idea it was great if they fix the few short falling then I would definitely look into there products again.
      When I let them know this they said they will look into to it for future produces, but I can buy a IPAQ
      now.

      --
      I am a republican not by choice, but rather by lack there of.
  32. Does it still have the annoying iPAQ button bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The current iPAQs have an annoying problem that (IMHO) renders the hardware unusable for gaming. Currently, they will not recognize button presses if you have more than two buttons pressed at the same time, with a 'joystick' push counting as a button. So if you are pushing up, and you press one of the other buttons, the other button will not be registered.

    Just try to play a MAME game under that situation.

    So my question is, did they fix that annoying problem in this new iPAQ?

  33. Do the B/W cheap ones run linux? by nft · · Score: 1

    I've seen the black and white screen iPaqs for $200 with a $50 rebate. Handhelds.org couldn't tell me if it'll run linux. Can you?

    --
    "We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -Gandhi
    1. Re:Do the B/W cheap ones run linux? by JesseL · · Score: 2

      The info is from handhelds.org about running linux on the 3100 series is here.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  34. try www.pcketlinux.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they have a distro ready i think

  35. What about the Agenda??? by PONA-Boy · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry if this is a bit off-topic...

    I'm looking into handhelds right now to help curb my natural "absentminded professor" tendencies. I have the Palm, the Visor, the iPAQ, and now the VR3.

    The Agenda is already running Linux...what's everyone's take on it versus the iPAQ???

    -PONA-

    --
    +that's funny...I don't FEEL tardy.+
  36. No Windows, please by magi · · Score: 2

    I'll buy an iPaq on the day it has Linux (or just the bootloader) preinstalled, and none of my money goes to a criminal organization. Even if that wasn't relevant, there's absolutely no sense in paying for software that you don't use and actually remove on the first day.

    Well, I might try the Agenda while waiting for the windowless iPaq. It's much cheaper, too.

    I remember that the iPaq Linux port had some problems with the deep sleep mode (APM stuff) earlier. I guess those have been corrected by now? It would be kind of silly to have a PDA which batteries only last 2 hours or so.

  37. The English Language by cpeterso · · Score: 1

    Jason Dunn sent us to a link on his site about the new new iPaq, which is due out relatively soon. [subject verb?] Aesthetic changes, more memory, and I assume Linux will run on it as well or better then the existing models.

    Dear Cmdr Taco:

    Your first sentence is missing a comma and includes too many instances of the word "new." It is also awkwardly worded. Your second "sentence" is not actually a sentence. You forgot to include a subject and a verb! Plus you should have used the word "than" instead of "then." Was there an English requirement for your GED?

    1. Re:The English Language by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      Grammar rules don't apply to conversational dialog, you fucking nutwad.

  38. definitely definately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is definitly dfinite definite dfinitly dfinite finitely finite dfinitly finit finitely and definately not definate

  39. Re:Offtopic (JOB) by MisterPo · · Score: 1

    Feel for you fella, truely do.
    I used to work as a PM/Sys Admin for Blue Chips.
    Decided to pack in my job and work in Australia for a year.......can barely get a job as an office temp :(

    Po