Slashdot Mirror


Joss Whedon Is Creating a Sci-Fi Drama For Fox

grafikhugh writes "An article on Yahoo! News states that Joss Whedon, the creator of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and "Angel", is close to closing a deal with Fox. He will create thirteen episodes of a "Anti-Trek" Sci-Fi Drama to be a big player in Fox's fall 2002 line up. Its seems Whedon wants to avoid aliens as the big bad, and concentrate on making "scary-ass" humans Living in a "Dark Place"." It's also worth noting the IMDB entries for a possible buffy spin-off Ripper and an animated Buffy.

230 comments

  1. I only have one problem with this.. by Dimensio · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...with Joss's work on Angel, Fray, the animated show and the limited work he does on Buffy (since Marti Noxon does most of it now), how is he going to manage everything?

    1. Re:I only have one problem with this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Limited work on Buffy?
      You could say the same for Angel, as Joss hasn't even been to an Angel shoot for the entire season.
      Joss is always where he is needed, at ME, breaking the stories, nothing will change with Firefly.
      As much as people hate Marti Noxon for "ruining" the shows for them, they don't quite realize exactly what it takes to put the show together, and that perhaps they are more upset with the actual storylines instead of the low quality writing they feel comes right from Marti.

  2. Buffy and Angel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Troll

    Come on... not to troll or flame, but these shows only have popularity cause of one thing:
    Great looking chicks.

    Same reason why dawson's creek is popular. Star Trek got the same idea when they lost viewers to voyager. Enterprise has nice "soft porn" scenes. When I think a "SciFi" from the creator of "Buffy" is just gonna make another show with good looking women that bastardizes people like Heinlein.

    Maybe he'll prove me wrong? Prolly not...

    1. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 2, Informative

      They need beautiful people because of the title. If you've actually watched it with any bit of interest (I'm not talking one or two episodes) you would understand. This is not Star Trek, episodes do not stand on their own, you need to know the story.

      Conflicts and issues don't resolve in the same episode, sometimes not even in the same season, if you're tuning in for the first time, you won't even see it.

      --
      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
    2. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is not Star Trek, episodes do not stand on their own, you need to know the story. Conflicts and issues don't resolve in the same episode, sometimes not even in the same season, if you're tuning in for the first time, you won't even see it.

      Just like Dawson's Creek?

      Great, you made it from something insultable to a desperate mans soap opera full of scantily clad teenage girls.... AND made yourself look like one of those desperate men in the process...

    3. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Bastardizes Heinlein." Hmm. Me thinks that way to many people who worship Heinlein think anything done that shows super hereo type charectors are always following the way of Heinlein but screwing it up. I've read Heinny. Maybe Whedon has his own style. Granted the hot chicks are definately a big plus on the show. But recent episodes of Trek vs. Buffy. Give me Buffy anyday. Good story (really, it might seem like crap the first time you watch it), inventive plotline, and very good adherance to mythos of the show.
      And besides all that. Chicks dig it. Show me a chick that likes Buffy and can't resist a man who knows all about here fav show.
      Angel on the otherhand, holds little joy for me. While I find the plotline decent. Charisma Carpenter makes me want to vomit day-glow whenever I see her. Most of the other charectors on the show suck just as bad. The only thing good in the show is the bad-guys and maybe Angel.

    4. Re:Buffy and Angel? by jaymz666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People also tune into this for the season long story arcs, the interrelationships between the characters and the fact that most people can relate to the characters.

    5. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And maybe your a lonely man desperate to see a sexy teenage girl and dream about her?

      Ackams Razor....

    6. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree with you more. Most "Science fiction material on television these days has no real value. Like you said, It is just a bunch of special affects and hot chicks showing skin that adds up to a bunch of eye candy that makes most people want to tune in. It's funny just how many "science fiction" shows there are right now, and a large majority of them are bad.

    7. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what newsgroups are for...

    8. Re:Buffy and Angel? by amnesty · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, I would have agreed with you maybe a year ago. Who would want to watch a show called Buffy: The Vampire Slayer anyway??

      But then one of my friends started raving about how good this series is, and he's the kind of guy who doesn't watch a show just for the good looking women.

      Slowly he managed to convince me to watch the show. While season 1 was pretty bad and gave the necessary backstory, season 2 and 3 gave me some of the best hours of TV I've watched.

      Angel is one of the best villians I have ever seen in my life. Sure, Darth Vader killed a lot of people and Kevin Spacey in Se7en made you want to throw up, but Angel was cruel, vicious and stabbed you in the heart with every mean word he said. The buildup of Angel as a good guy beforehand is what creates the intense emotional weight of Angel as a bad guy.

      Meanwhile Xander, Willow, Oz, and all the regulars have such a great ensemble together. Joss Whedon gives them some great, witty dialogue and you find these people would be people that you'd actually want to be friends with.

      This is a show that never sells out for an easy plot. When the show has twists, turns and surprises, it earns it. Even in all the silliness of the episode Bewitched, Bothered, Bewildered, where Amy's love spell screws up and makes all the girls go after Xander, this act has repercussions. Willow is upset afterwards for how she was forced to act with Xander, for example.

      Hush, an episode where the characters can't speak, nominated for an Emmy.

      The Body, an episode where Buffy's mother dies, and the BEST episode ever for portrayal of a death. Many long cuts, slow scenes, very realistic, and no music through the entire show.

      Recently, the Buffy Musical was a great achievement, even UPN allowed the show to run 9 minutes longer than the usual 44 minutes for an episode.

      The show sounds really cheesy, the ideas really campy, but it never takes itself too seriously and makes fun of itself a lot. Throws in some excellently written emotional plotlines and earns the audiences' feelings. Even actors who want to get on the show usually have to convince their Agents. "You want to be on Buffy the WHAT??"

      And the spin-off is quality. Angel can be described as the best stuff on TV you're not watching.

      If you're not convinced, check out Buffy creator/writer/producer/director/superhero Joss Whedon's interview on The Onion and you can see how intense and visonary this guy is.

    9. Re:Buffy and Angel? by YanIsa · · Score: 1

      When I think a "SciFi" from the creator of "Buffy" is just gonna make another show with good looking women that bastardizes people like Heinlein.

      Funny - when I think of a SF series by Joss Whedon, I think "Finally! Then possibly Farscape wont't be the only SF show really worth watching anymore.."

      As a SF and Buffy fan, I for one am thrilled.

      Yan

      --
      I think this line's only filler
    10. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Syberghost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Come on... not to troll or flame, but these shows only have popularity cause of one thing:
      Great looking chicks.


      Then why aren't other shows with MORE hot chicks more popular with the same audience?

      Buffy draws an audience that includes a lot of straight girls. Dawson's Creek isn't very popular with straight guys 24-45.

      In short, "not to troll or flame" was bullshit, you're trolling.

    11. Re:Buffy and Angel? by pete_townshend · · Score: 1

      Yeah, its just the hot chicks. Not the quality writing and acting.

    12. Re:Buffy and Angel? by nicoleva · · Score: 1

      awwwww mr. coward -- you disappoint me. Have you not noticed the brilliant dialogue? the witty banter?? As a 'chick' myself I can say I watch the show, and as a hetero-chick I can also say it's not because of the T&A.

    13. Re:Buffy and Angel? by jafac · · Score: 2

      While I agree that Hush was a great episode, and I think it should have won that emmy - I think that the series has gone down hill from approximately that point on. I dont like any of the new characters since Angel left the show.

      I didn't think that the musical episode was all that original.

      For instance, it was done before - in Xena.

      And Lucy Lawless has a MUCH better singing voice than SMG.
      And nicer boobs.

      I'm not quite sure who would win in a fight though. Lucy Lawless is quite butch as Xena, but Buffy has super-powers, while Xena is just well-trained.

      Right now, Angel is the show I prefer of the two. Dark Angel's pretty good too.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Come on... not to troll or flame, but these shows only have popularity cause of one thing: Great looking chicks.

      You are just plain wrong. Buffy watchers don't watch the show for the hot chicks. IMHO people watch Buffy for the same reason they watched Babylon 5: because there's interesting stuff happening, conceptual continuity, foreshadowing, surprises, etc.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    15. Re:Buffy and Angel? by IronChef · · Score: 2

      Joss Whedon gives them some great, witty dialogue and you find these people would be people that you'd actually want to be friends with.

      I do not dispute that he is The Man, but the dialogue is one of the things I have a problem with. It's not bad... but it is all sort of the same.

      Next time you watch one of his shows, try this...

      Wait for a character to make some kind of wisecrack. Then, close your eyes and imagine any other character on the show saying the same thing.

      Most of the time, you will find it fits pretty well. All of the characters on Buffy and Angel sound alike to a great degree, especially when they are cracking wise.

      I realized this about a year ago, and now, like the reel change marks in a theater, I can't stop noticing it. If the actors weren't quality, it would be really glaring.

      It's still great TV though... but I have to admit I am a bit worried about the turn Angel has taken lately. They NEED to get rid of that baby somehow. If they don't, well, the last ep is when Angel jumped the shark.

    16. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Batskeets · · Score: 1
      Um, hi? This is Hollywood. Therefore, just about *every member of the cast*, on ANY given show, is going to be a "great looking chick/guy."

      And despite what my friends might say, I don't think the ladies of Buffy are the hands-down hottest chicks to be found on the small screen, either. But then, I'm not a guy, so there you go.

      I, of course, like Buffy, but everyone else has pretty much given my own reasons for liking it. It's good TV, and it's not about cute people... most cute people irritate the crap out of me, in fact.

      And, IMHO, Dawson's Creek is mainly popular because teenybopper kids *love* contrived B.S. in their programming, whether they'll admit it or not. ;p

    17. Re:Buffy and Angel? by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen an interview with Joss? He talks the same way! Or rather, the Buffy characters all talk like Joss. But that show can get away with it it because it's so distinctive, both on TV and in real life.

      -B

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    18. Re:Buffy and Angel? by andyt · · Score: 1

      */me Swallows ritalout*

      Wait a second!!! Buffy plotlines suck ass!!!

      Buffy has, to coin a phrase, jumped the shark. Everything from the fourth series onwards stank, in terms of frankly boring story arcs, desperately bad attempts at humour and uninteresting characters.

      Now maybe it gets better in series 6. But if it's the same as 4 and 5 then they should just drag the carcass of the show into the street and shoot it. "Buffy the Musical" indeed. Bloody hellfire...

  3. space opera by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >He came up with a concept that's part Western,
    >part space drama.

    Hmm... maybe we will see a return to true space opera(like 1930s sci-fi literature). I would love to see a straight up western transposed into outer space. Space-ships and six-shooters. I've always been intrigued by the crossover of high and low tech.

    1. Re:space opera by Neck_of_the_Woods · · Score: 1

      try reading the S. King books that are sort of like this.

      I think they are called, "The Dark Tower" series.

      Sometimes they get a little out there, but what S. King book does not. Most S. King lovers don't care for this series because he kind of breaks away from his typical scare the shit out of you mode.

      --
      Neck_of_the_Woods
      #/usr/local/surf/glassy/overhead
    2. Re:space opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cowboy Bebop sort of does this.

    3. Re:space opera by TheoFish · · Score: 1

      If Anime is your thing, try Trigun.

    4. Re:space opera by waitdyahoo.com · · Score: 1

      I am not sure who you would cast in them, but hte dark Tower series would make a nice movie or better yet a mini series.

    5. Re:space opera by druiid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or everyone's favorite..... Cowboy Bebop. There's quite a bit of the old in that show... well, in a way the whole series was about the "old".

    6. Re:space opera by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      If we're talking anime anyway, Trigun might also fit what the poster was asking about.

    7. Re:space opera by nhavar · · Score: 2

      There was a show on in the early 90's that did this, can't remember the name but I remember Linda Hunt as the chief and Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa played the token alien partner. I think it was space rangers or something like that. It showed for about 3 or 4 episodes and then dissappeared. Of course it was competing against Babylon 5 for ratings so....

      --
      "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
    8. Re:space opera by rhombic · · Score: 1

      Space ships and six-shooters. Scary humans as the vicious bad-guys, no aliens, no magical powers. Maybe have an ex-mafia guy trying to outrun his past as the protagonist. Maybe have an ex-cop as his partner. Add some hackers, a cute female or two. Plenty of gritty, rough lighting. Good music, maybe some jazz, with good blues harmonica added in for good measure. Plenty of martial arts for the action sequences. Seems to remind me of something I saw lately.....

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    9. Re:space opera by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      There was a cartoon in the 1980s (tied to a line of toys, of course) that was like that. It was about this indian-cowboy on some planet with a talking horse with robotic legs. The horse's name was 30-30. In the toy stores they even sold a line of infrared guns related to the show a-la Laser Tag.

    10. Re:space opera by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      I would love to see a straight up western transposed into outer space.

      Check out Outland. It's High Noon set in a mining output on moon around Jupiter.

    11. Re:space opera by tb3 · · Score: 2

      Actually, they tried, and failed miserably. Check out "Moon Zero Two" made in the early 70's. Even had bar-fights (in zero-g) and space six-shooters. Here's the IBDB link.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    12. Re:space opera by Altus · · Score: 1

      I realy liked this movie... I keep hearing people talk shit about it but it was realy solid and with "Mr. Bond" as the lead how could you go wrong.

      I especialy like the doors to the bar on the colony...

      great movie

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    13. Re:space opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're thinking of Marshall Bravestar. I got the action figures second hand and I thought they were cool. He had the powers of different animals or something. It's been a long time.

    14. Re:space opera by Danse · · Score: 2

      Cowboy Bebop was great. Too bad it was so short.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    15. Re:space opera by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      can't remember the name
      Probably Space Rangers.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    16. Re:space opera by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Yeah, apart from the good old "heads exploding in vacuum" clich&eacute, it was quite good.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  4. Science Action by svara · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I only hope that this will become a real _science_ fiction thing with some action... not a pseudo-science space-soap like Star Trek.

    1. Re:Science Action by Shadowlion · · Score: 1

      What do you consider the difference between "real _science_ fiction" and "psuedo-science space-soap"?

    2. Re:Science Action by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      pseudo-science space-soap like Star Trek.
      Trek's not a soap, it's a documentary - isn't it?

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  5. Ripper.. by jspectre · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is a series filming in England about the character "Rupert Giles." Ripper was his nickname as a teen. The series is supposedly about his years growing up and training to be a watcher..

    It's been long discussed on alt.tv.buffy-the-vampire-slayer.

    --

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    1. Re:Ripper.. by rkhalloran · · Score: 1

      If it was going to be him as a "beardless youth", then why would *he* be in it? My understanding was that it would be set in the present, with Giles as an investigator of the occult.

    2. Re:Ripper.. by mbourgon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, what I read from Joss (one of his posts) was that it was a story about a man investigating haunted houses, supernatural and otherwise. And it's going to be hard for Anthony Stewart Head to play a teen version of, well, himself.

      Part of it was brought on by ASH's wish to go back to England, and apparently the Beeb had a long-standing "we want!" for something of Joss'. It ought to be interesting. The big question is if the Beeb will shoot themselves in the foot and not let it show in the states. If not, I think the a.b.m.b-v-s newsgroup's going to be the U.S.'s only shot at watching it.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    3. Re:Ripper.. by KFury · · Score: 2

      Don't believe everything Joss says in the newsgroups. He has a flare for misdirection.

    4. Re:Ripper.. by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      The big question is if the Beeb will shoot themselves in the foot and not let it show in the states
      Or they could do what they did with the last season of Due South - spend my licence fee on making it then not show it for two years...

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    5. Re:Ripper.. by Batskeets · · Score: 1
      Yes, that's also what I heard... I was under the impression that it was going to focus on events that take place *after* Giles leaves Sunnydale for good.

      I'd also heard that the series had since been re-titled as "The Watcher," but I'm not sure who to doubt more, my own sources, or the IMDB's often-sketchy info about shows that are marked as being In Production.

  6. I don't think I believe him... by medcalf · · Score: 4, Funny
    I can make people that are scarier than anything you can put in latex.

    Scarier than Janet Reno in Latex?

    Is there a way to mod me down for breaking the mental image rule?

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    1. Re:I don't think I believe him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Panda

    2. Re:I don't think I believe him... by Sajma · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I first read this, I thought you mean LaTeX (ie. the formatting language), and was very confused. I would have been very impressed to find out that Joss Wheadon could use LaTeX...

    3. Re:I don't think I believe him... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      I can make people that are scarier than anything you can put in latex.

      Scarier than Janet Reno in Latex?


      Now how did you find out about this year's Big Bad?

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    4. Re:I don't think I believe him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words: Margert Thacther

    5. Re:I don't think I believe him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me strange, but that's kind of an appealing thought. I find those suits she wears so... bland.

      Hmm... perhaps something in a dip-on glove, knee-high boot arrangement; corsett... how to top if off, though? Ah! A just-above-the-ankle latex skirt! And the whole thing in... I think blue would suit her well. With black trim.

      Ok, I'm no huge latex fan, but you've got to admit that Reno would look good in just about whatever!

    6. Re:I don't think I believe him... by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Scarier than Janet Reno in Latex?

      Two words: Roseanne Barr

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  7. And the cast is.... by b.foster · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've been following the discussion about this show on USENET, and the speculation about who the cast members will be is rampant and very interesting. Here are some of the more likely possibilities:
    • Sarah Michelle Geller is likely to be cast as an alien, as the obligatory 7-of-9 clone.
    • Wil Wheaton, in an effort to rescue his foundering career, will probably be one of the main characters. He will work for cheap and he's easily recognizable, so why not?
    • David Duchovney will probably also have many guest appearances, although keeping him on full-time will probably put the show waaaay over budget.
    • Ryan Phillippe will probably be the token pretty-boy character, because, well, that's just what he does best.
    There were many other names mentioned, of course, but these seemed to be the most credible.

    Bill

    1. Re:And the cast is.... by GreyyGuy · · Score: 2

      This gets modded as interesting? Usenet talk? That is usually as reliable as an end user's PC diagnosis :)

      Why not say William Shatner as the big giant latex-clad head? That would fit in the humans-as-scary category :)

      It would be much more likely, judging from other shows, that they would go without the big name stars because they would need the $ for fx. Besides, neither Buffy, Angel, or the X-Files used big name stars when they started.

  8. Cartoon Buffy by wiredog · · Score: 2

    With SMG playing Velma (IIRC) in the live action Scooby Doo (Am I the only one that finds the thought of a live action Scooby more frightening than Evil Angel?) will the cartoon Buffy look like Velma? Will it have a drug addicted dog?

    1. Re:Cartoon Buffy by rkhalloran · · Score: 1

      Actually, SMG is playing Daphne to her RL squeeze Freddy Prinze Jr's [will SOMEONE please off this puke?] Fred. Velma is being played by Linda Cardellini (Freaks&Geeks, Legally Blonde), and Shaggy by Matt Lillard. The ONLY potential redeeming item in this upcoming abortion is Rowan Atkinson as the baddie...

    2. Re:Cartoon Buffy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Stealing from IMDB (http://us.imdb.com/Title?0267913) the cast list reads:

      • Matthew Lillard -> Norville 'Shaggy' Rogers
      • Freddie Prinze Jr. -gt; Fred Jones
      • Sarah Michelle Gellar -gt; Daphne Blake
      • Linda Cardellini -gt; Velma Dinkley
      • Rowan Atkinson -gt; Mondavarious

      The trailer is here

    3. Re:Cartoon Buffy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who plays Scooby?

      The list of possibilities is endless:
      Janet Reno, Courtney Love, Madonna, Barbara Steisand...

    4. Re:Cartoon Buffy by davidhan · · Score: 1

      IMDB says Scott Innes - but it looks like he's only doing the voice. He's done other voice overs.

    5. Re:Cartoon Buffy by tb3 · · Score: 2

      Hey, since it's a live action, maybe they can use langauge that they aren't allowed to use on TV. I always wanted to hear Scooby Doo say:

      "Raggy, you're a rashole."

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    6. Re:Cartoon Buffy by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      So who plays Scooby Doo?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  9. Erm by MisterBlister · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I seem to be in the minority wrt/geeks, but I've always thought Joss Whedon is incredibly overrated. Yes, Buffy is a fairly clever show, but everything else I've seen that he's been attached to has been crap, IMO.

    He seems to be a one-trick pony, like Stone/Parker (I like South Park; but Basketball? That Bush show? Hell, even Orgasmo, which I know does have a cult following.....all crap IMO).

    1. Re:Erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If all he did was his work on "Toy Story" (darn fine script, much of the best of which came from him), then he'd be alright with me.

    2. Re:Erm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joss would be the first person to agree with you. He hates every movie he's ever been involved with except Toy Story, I think, because he has no control over anything but what he writes, and in every case, they have thrown ninety percent of his contribution out and kept the other ten percent but destroyed the context. I assume the new show will be more like Buffy in quality since he's in charge.

      You should read the interview he did while he was drunk. I can't remember where I saw it or I'd tell you, but it's good.

  10. And you thought enterprise was bad... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    Everyone moaned (both in a good and bad way) about "Enterprises" scantly clad vulcan woman, and her "soft porn" rubdown scene... Imagine what Joss will do with scifi & women!

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:And you thought enterprise was bad... by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      If he can pull the same kind of innuendo that he created in the Buffy episode "Once More, With Feeling" during the song "I'm Under Your Spell", I'm sure that this show will have a lot of fanboys pulling for it.

  11. Hmmm by Ricky+M.+Waite · · Score: 1

    Well, I loved the first three seasons of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, but after that he and the other writers just seemed to run out of ideas - it got really repetetive and just lost its charm.

    One of the biggest things that drew me to Buffy as opposed to other "sci-fi" shows was the real life appeal it had, it tended with issues I (as a teenager) faced while mixing in the mystery of the occult.

    It sounds to me like he'll follow the same lead in this series and I'm gonna definitely check it out.

    Also, Buffy was hot *wink* *wink*

    --

    We wave the flag of freedom as we conquer and invade.
    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puke! I hate this trend of every TV show needing to address every social issue there is while mixing in humor, drama, action, mystery, BLAH! I understand that a show is going to touch on social issues just because the show will mirror real life. But to go way out of your way to have "Buffy deals with the issue of rape while saving her friend from vampires". I want to see shows that make me FORGET about what's going on around me. I want some respit from the day in day out problems with society. Suspend disbelief for a moment, if I want to be reminded of social issues I'll watch 7th Heaven or Touched by an Angel, or something with Cosby in it, but if I see yet another Star Trek that discusses the issue of racism I'm just going to throw something at the T.V. Stop giving us formula entertainment((cute_but_tuff_girl + angry_distant_guy) + (monsters||aliens||govt_thugs||supernatural) + social_issue_of_the_day == hit) Yuck!

    2. Re:Hmmm by Johnny00 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with this, I enjoy shows/movies the best when they don't try to teach me a lesson and just tell a story. Thats what the medium is all about, telling a story. A few good examples that comes to mind are Way of the Gun , American Beauty and Seinfeld . They didn't teach me anything but I thoroughly enjoyed them all.

      I wish the television networks would realize this and encourage the writers to just 'relax' and quit preaching.

      Buffy and Angel have followed the same pattern and I stopped watching them for this reason, it just wasn't entertaining anymore.

      --
      I live life on the edge ... of my desk.
    3. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry can't I'm on my period.

  12. what stations attract what series... by sniepre · · Score: 1

    On TNN - Star Trek: The Next Generation
    On UPN - Star Trek: Voyager
    On FOX - Star Trek: Panties in Space

    --
    Is not life a hundred times too short for us to bore ourselves? -Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
    1. Re:what stations attract what series... by JFTaylor · · Score: 1

      slight addendum to that:
      On TNN - Star Trek: TNG
      On UPN - Star Trek: Voyager
      On FOX - Star Trek: Look man, more Lesbians!
      :)

      --
      ---- James
  13. Re:space opera... Uhhhhhh.... by simetra · · Score: 1

    They tried that... Wild Wild West. 'nuf said.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  14. I'll watch it by Taco_spork · · Score: 0

    if Sarah gets naked

    --
    Fuck you, taco hell!
  15. what was wrong with Star Trek? by mrroot · · Score: 1

    From the article...
    Whedon said ``Firefly'' would in some ways be a sort of ``anti-'Star Trek''' with no regular aliens or other monstrous creatures.

    Thats one thing I always hated about Star Trek, the aliens ruined every episode. Let's all hope this show has alot more personal dialog and relationship storylines.

    Seriously though, why no aliens or monstrous creatures? Maybe the TV studios want more person-to-person relationship storylines, romance, and more of a drama rather than adventure nowdays.

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
    1. Re:what was wrong with Star Trek? by ctyner · · Score: 1
      Seriously though, why no aliens or monstrous creatures?

      The article says no regular aliens or monstrous creatures. Does this just means we'll be treated to a "monster of the week"?

  16. Dude by wiredog · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some of us are trying to eat lunch!

    1. Re:Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Ok, here's something else for you. Mmmm...

  17. Alien Resurrection by rnb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Admittedly, I've never seen Buffy or Angel, or whatever those shows are, but I'm not sure I can ever forgive this guy for Alien Resurrection. Alien 3 pretty much destroyed an otherwise excellent series and then it was followed by something that could have set the series back on track but instead was just ... well, most of us saw what it was.

    Yech.

    1. Re:Alien Resurrection by Pope · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might wish to read this interview first before blaming him 100% for Alien Resurrection...

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    2. Re:Alien Resurrection by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Don't blame Joss for Alien Resurrection, FOX tends to meddle with every movie he has a hand in and he is never happy with the results.

      That isn't to say that he's a paragon of direction and production -- X-Men was rather popular amongst moviegoers even though Joss personally hated the changes Apparently exactly two segments of dialogue that he wrote made it into the final cut ("Prove it" "You're a dick" was one of them).

    3. Re:Alien Resurrection by rnb · · Score: 1

      Hmm.

      Okay, after discovering that Joss Whedon and I both feel the same way about Alien: Resurrection, I retract my previous comment.

      I wonder then, just what the hell happened to that movie? The director had done good movies before, he went on to do Amelie, which was fantastic, I assumed it had to be the writer. Man.

      I guess this isn't the forum for that question, though. Oh, well.

    4. Re:Alien Resurrection by amnesty · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Joss Whedon hated Alien Resurrection as well. His scripts are written be to delivered in a very specific way, and many directors just don't 'get' it. Here's a clip from an interview, talking about his work on X-Men and leading into Alien Resurrection.

      JW: X-Men was very interesting in that, by that time, I actually had a reputation in television. I was actually somebody. People stopped thinking I was John Sweden on the phone. And then, in X-Men, not only did they throw out my script and never tell me about it; they actually invited me to the read-through, having thrown out my entire draft without telling me. I was like, "Oh, that's right! This is the movies! The writer is shit in the movies!" I'll never understand that. I have one line left in that movie. Actually, there are a couple of lines left in that are out of context and make no sense, or are delivered so badly, so terribly... There's one line that's left the way I wrote it.

      O: Which is?

      JW: "'It's me.' 'Prove it.' 'You're a dick.'" Hey, it got a laugh.

      O: It's funny that the only lines I really remember from that movie are that one and Storm's toad comment.

      JW: Okay, which was also mine, and that's the interesting thing. Everybody remembers that as the worst line ever written, but the thing about that is, it was supposed to be delivered as completely offhand. [Adopts casual, bored tone.] "You know what happens when a toad gets hit by lightning?" Then, after he gets electrocuted, "Ahhh, pretty much the same thing that happens to anything else." But Halle Berry said it like she was Desdemona. [Strident, ringing voice.] "The same thing that happens to everything eeelse!" That's the thing that makes you go crazy. At least "You're a dick" got delivered right. The worst thing about these things is that, when the actors say it wrong, it makes the writer look stupid. People assume that the line... I listened to half the dialogue in Alien 4, and I'm like, "That's idiotic," because of the way it was said. And nobody knows that. Nobody ever gets that. They say, "That was a stupid script," which is the worst pain in the world. I have a great long boring story about that, but I can tell you the very short version. In Alien 4, the director changed something so that it didn't make any sense. He wanted someone to go and get a gun and get killed by the alien, so I wrote that in and tried to make it work, but he directed it in a way that it made no sense whatsoever. And I was sitting there in the editing room, trying to come up with looplines to explain what's going on, to make the scene make sense, and I asked the director, "Can you just explain to me why he's doing this? Why is he going for this gun?" And the editor, who was French, turned to me and said, with a little leer on his face, [adopts gravelly, smarmy, French-accented voice] "Because eet's een the screept." And I actually went and dented the bathroom stall with my puddly little fist. I have never been angrier. But it's the classic, "When something goes wrong, you assume the writer's a dork." And that's painful.

    5. Re:Alien Resurrection by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      it was followed by something that could have set the series back on track but instead was just ...

      Am I the only person who thought that Resurrection was on the track to being down-right awesome right up until the point that the ugly psuedo-humanoid thing was given birth to?

      I think the cut off for the greatness was when Ripley-Clone fell down into the alien nest-pitt-thing. After that it the movie went straight to shit.

      The worst part is -- that if you think about it -- the plot could have easily been saved if they had made the baby alien something more interesting, such as a Ripley lookalike ala-species, maybe just a bit sexier with solid black skin and agility and speed that Ripley would have had to fight with witts. It could have been awesome.

      It could have been.

      Instead... as it was said...

      well, most of us saw what it was.

      Yech.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  18. Battlestar Galactica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wonder if this has anything to do with the difficulties that the new Battlestar Galactica production is having with Fox.

  19. title of the show by Transient0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > Tentatively titled ``Firefly,'' the new
    > ensemble series takes place 500 years in the
    > future and revolves around the crew of a
    > "small, incredibly mobile spaceship whose aft
    > end lights up", Whedon said -- hence the name.

    For god's sake! you would think that a TV network would be able to afford to employ someone just to stop people from doing things like this!

    i mean, come on:

    "Well we don't have a name yet, but the little model we built had an LED in it's ass, let's see if we can work that into it somewhere..."

  20. Actor still, still seeking work... by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, at least our names rhyme...imagine the Project Mayhem we could pull on the set...

    How 'bout it, Joss?

    1. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      Looks like someone is looking for a little action with Sara Michelle, eh will? ;-)

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      So I take it that this poster's comment was fairly off-base? Or is that one of those things that you can neither confirm nor deny, nudge nudge, wink wink?

      I'd love to see you in another sci-fi series, especially if you get to play some kind of villanous character. Get you a mohawk, maybe some odd facial tattoo, you'd be perfect.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    3. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is supposed to be the anti-Trek, right?

      So, what, you'll play a character the fans like? :-)

    4. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't Robert Patrick get you a guest shot on the X-Files? You were in an "Outer Limits" epp with him.

      How about this as a character on "Firefly"? You play a guy crippled somehow in the war. A nice dueling scar and maybe a mechanical hand, that keeps malfunctioning. Oh, yeah, you could be the Chief Engineer, and keep adding gadgets to your mechanical hand!

      Cpt_Kirks

    5. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by Stevis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is that all you do, cruise Slashdot looking for work?

      Stevis

      --
      We've got two lives, one we're given, and the other one we make. --Mary Chapin Carpenter
    6. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by Fredbo · · Score: 1

      So much for typecasting, huh?

    7. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    8. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by Elektrik2001 · · Score: 1

      Hey now, I like Wesley Crusher...
      And liver....
      and cow's brains
      and Anne from "Weakest Link" (I think she had it bad for you-so did William Shatner, now that I think about it....)
      and....

    9. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Wil,

      Love your eBid idea for your autographed pics! I can't believe that the bid is already up to almost 400 bucks for you in that gawd awful gray uniform they made you wear on ST:TNG!

      http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewIte m& item=1049837905

      BTW ... many have said (over on trekbbs.com, the ST:ENT forum) they would LOVE to see ya play a bad ass alien on ST:ENT too!

      Any chance of you actually getting to do a stint on ST:ENT in that fashion?

    10. Re:Actor still, still seeking work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that was the image I had.

      Cpt_Kirks

  21. Anti-Trek by Proaxiom · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Star Trek and Anti-Trek attempt to occupy the same time slot, do they both vanish in a brilliant flash of light?

    1. Re:Anti-Trek by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      Those who observe it would be no more. Everyone else would celebrate...until the world starts rotting for a lack of dreams.

      Or: so that's how we could power a warp drive! ;)

  22. Maybe by wiredog · · Score: 2

    You can get a job as a Red Shirt?

    1. Re:Maybe by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • [Maybe] You [CleverNickName aka Wil Wheaton aka Wesley Crusher] can get a job as a Red Shirt?
      • Lt. Wezley Crasher: Captain, there's a critical trans-temporal variance in the antimatter plasma conduits! Our only chance is for me to crawl down the Jeff-, er Access Tubes and reroute the phase transducence through the gamma confluguence array!
      • Cpt. Bob: Security, shoot that man.
      • Security Goon: <zap>
      • [Opening credits roll]
      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  23. If it means I don't have to... by mkmiller · · Score: 1

    sit through crappy theme music (enterprise), I'll watch it. I can see it now.....Green aliens with horns, aliens with big teeth, aliens with personality complexes, aliens with secret love affairs, aliens that die and come back to life on other networks.

  24. wild wild west by Transient0 · · Score: 1

    true, but it's possible to make a bad movie in any genre. Even from a good story.

    look at spaceship troopers.

  25. how ingenious! by jahjeremy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Doesn't sound like anything I've ever seen on tv before . I'm amazed by this guy's ingenuity.

  26. wonder what the physics will be like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    will they stick with the gravity generator style of space ships, as in Space Trek,....or will they have lack of gravity.

    I expect the ships will have gravity, as the production hassles of faking lack of gravity would be costly.

    1. Re:wonder what the physics will be like by rhombic · · Score: 1

      Just have a spaceship with a revolving section for the crew to live (interact) in. Make the cockpit zero-G for cool special effects. No big budget, easy to do with CG, real physics problem solved. Kubrick figured it out for 2001, and nobody's improved on it yet.

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    2. Re:wonder what the physics will be like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I would also like the "noise in
      space trend" to end. I think that if
      done properly lack of noise would be more
      impressive and scary than with noise at this
      point. Nothing like having an EVA pod silently
      barreling down on you with just your nervous
      breathing in your ears.

  27. An Anti-Trek and Anti-Buffy musical... by NRAdude · · Score: 0

    would be a great way to finish up the fox episodes. In my local newspaper, about 1 month ago, also with advertisements on Dish and public TV, there was a Buffy the Vampire Slayer musical being formed. At the verry second ,I questioned myself on the basis of 1)will they advertise Microsoft X-Box in this musical, and 2)is there a god?

    I hope Joss makes an Anti-Buffy musical, lord willing.

    --
    without prejudice
  28. Or similar to this old gem... by jahjeremy · · Score: 1
    Battlestar Galactica

    I don't understand why a more cyberpunkish series set here on earth a la Neuromancer wouldn't be a better, cooler, "darker" (whatever) concept. Suppose Fox already has this , but its kind of, well, cut-rate.

  29. Speilberg 'Taken' by Ironix · · Score: 1


    Has anyone heard much of the 20 hour mini-series called 'Taken'?

    They have a $50 Million budget, and apparantly it revolves around abduction stories beginning in 1947...

    The only reason I know anything about this is that they spent a week filming at my house in North Vancouver.

    --
    Still #1 -- Lonely Gay Geek
  30. I'm not feeling generous right now by Rocketboy · · Score: 2

    Good or bad, what has his record doing non-SF have to do with whether or not he can put together an interesting SF series? Does he know how incredibly short the list is of non-SF writers who have failed miserably when they tried to write science fiction? (Almost as difficult as it is to go from SF into mainstream.)

    Can he do SF? Won't know until he tries. He hasn't done it so far, but then most of the "SciFi" billed stuff on TV and movies isn't SF either. I hope he remembers that success with Buffy doesn't automatically translate into success in other genres: I think it helps the creativity when the hounds and jackels are only half a step behind... Fear is a terrific motivator, sometimes.

    Prediction: lousy SF, possibly profitable typical Hollywood "SciFi" crap. Cha-ching and he'll go off to do something that takes a bit less effort.

    1. Re:I'm not feeling generous right now by UUDDLRLRBASTRT · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you've seen Aliens, or the X-men movie, or many of his other film credits. The Onion has a GREAT interview with him in their AV section in which he discusses his past endeavors besides buffy. Joss Wheadon has done LOTS of Sci-Fi. You just didn't know it was him.

    2. Re:I'm not feeling generous right now by UUDDLRLRBASTRT · · Score: 1

      Here you go, here's a complete credit list for Joss Whedon at IMDB Included in the list are TITAN AE, Alien Resurrectoin, X-men the movie (uncredited), and Aliens.

  31. Expect quality, in the sense that you shouldn't by Faust7 · · Score: 1, Troll
    Joss Whedon, the creator of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and "Angel", is close to closing a deal with Fox.

    Why, with credits like those two spectacular shows, and with a target station of such unequaled reputation like Fox, I can't imagine that this would be anything but unadulterated television brilliance. Truly.

    1. Re:Expect quality, in the sense that you shouldn't by bitrott · · Score: 1

      No, he's not a troll because we all disagree with him... He's a troll because he's an idiot.

  32. Yeah sure.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I would watch "Baywatch the Musical" if it came out ;)

    Get a clue! It's one of the funniest shows on TV.
    And as odd as the story is, the characters are more believable the your average(or even good) show.

  33. Ripper by rlp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually the story of a person who purchases CD audio disks and converts them to MP3 files. In the TV show he is pursued by a team of operatives from a sinister organization known as the R.I.A.A.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
  34. corn enough for a lifetime of enchiladas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am trying to finalize my machine that takes corn from TV and produces actual stone groun corn for my eventual consumption. (obviously I don't plan on just eating corn meal) So far, my initial tests have shown that Buffy and Angel have produced far FAR more corn than just about anything in the past 10 years. The problem is not the shows, but it would seem that I encounter a buffer overflow (literally) in my device simply because it just can not handle the over abundance of corn waves eminating from the TV on most episodes. I have some rather funny moments however, when especially corny situations arise and the machine just explodes converting my living room into a grain silo filled 7 feet with corn meal. Usually this happens any time one of the comical looking and horribly silly demons shows its face(s). I am figuring that some day, there will be this cute red demon with goat legs and a horn-tail, complete with pitch fork and goatee. If I could only stabalize my device before then, imagine what the output could do for world hunger!

  35. Buffy and Fray comic book series by webwench_72 · · Score: 1

    There is a Buffy comic book series already, as well as one called 'Fray' which is pretty similar. Ripper has been in the works for some time (this is why Giles left BTVS this season).

    No one does good vs evil better than Joss Whedon, IMHO.

    --

  36. Speaking of cock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  37. Now THAT'S original by Rocketboy · · Score: 2

    He came up with a concept that's part Western, part space drama.


    It might be worth remembering that Roddenbery originally pitched the first Star Trek to the studio as "Wagon Train to the Stars".

    1. Re:Now THAT'S original by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      Hmm. Gee. Wide, open frontiers. New civilizations, some empires but usually primitive compared to the explorers. Frontier living means you're often your own law.

      Nope, no similarities whatsoever.

  38. I'd love to see an animated Buffy series . . . by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 1

    . . . treated as an opportunity do things that would be prohibitively expensive in live action. Keep the interesting interrelationships and characters but also bring in more fantastic storylines. Heck, maybe even have vampires that fly.

    1. Re:I'd love to see an animated Buffy series . . . by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      Problem with this is that here in the US, with some very exceptions, most of the animation is targeted at children. It would be nice to see it treated as an adult/older person series, but the odds are against that. Though the odds do go up because for the life of me, I cannot (or is that will not) see how they can make a show about bloodsucking, killing vampires and the people who slay them into a standard youth oriented cartoon.

      Though I do like the concept if treated well, thats why I am such a big anime show. Unlike with live action, a good Science Fiction show with lots of neat effects and sets can be done for the same price as a sitcom-ish type show. (ie, Legend of the Galactic Heroes (Great Science Fiction anime) basically costs the same as Maison Ikkou)

    2. Re:I'd love to see an animated Buffy series . . . by mpe · · Score: 2

      Problem with this is that here in the US, with some very exceptions, most of the animation is targeted at children.

      If you think that's bad you should remember that UK terrestrial broadcasters consider anything sci-fi/fantasy related as being targeted at children. Even having to cut for content dosn't tend to act as a "cluebat".

      . It would be nice to see it treated as an adult/older person series, but the odds are against that. Though the odds do go up because for the life of me, I cannot (or is that will not) see how they can make a show about bloodsucking, killing vampires and the people who slay them into a standard youth oriented cartoon.

      Apparently they intend taking all the references to sex out. Also cartoons (including those from the US) have never had much of a problem with showing violence.

  39. Scary Humans? by fr2asbury · · Score: 2, Funny
    That's not new.

    I saw that all the time on Dr. Who.

    For some reason they all wore rubber suits and hissed or growled.



    Jonathan

  40. The Anti-Cliche Man by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    In a way, this development was sort of inevitable. There's a big market for SF on TV. But the genre's in a real rut. Most shows are invented by some semi-literate hack with one Big Idea that runs dry after a few episodes. On the rare instances where somebody has done something really creative and interesting, the project is soon taken over by media suits who judge story quality by the number of explosions, shootouts, and chase scenes.

    Joss Whedon is the antithesis of all this. Not that he's any great literary genius. He just makes up ordinary, low-brow stories. But he hates hackwork, and he hates repeating himself. Most of all, he hates cliches.

    You can see this in his biggest success, Buffy. The premise makes no sense at all, except as a kind of anti-cliche. It takes the biggest horror cliche of all, the helpless, clueless, personality-deficient teenage bimbo, and turns it on its head. Critics love to talk about how Buffy keeps "raising the bar", with ever stranger and more suprising stories and chracters. But really all that's happening is Whedon telling his writers, over and over, "No, we did that already."

    So is good news, not just for TV SF, but for the whole genre. As bad as the idea-deficient Hollywood SF writers are, they're easier to take than all those bloated-epic writers who think that a clever idea is all you need. Somebody needs to teach all these people the basics of good storytelling, and Whedon is just the person to do it.

    1. Re:The Anti-Cliche Man by cqnn · · Score: 2

      Sounds more like Roddenberry with every description...

      Let's make this clear, I Whedon Anti-Trek, or
      is he anti-what Paramount has done to the Star Trek
      continuity and story universe in the-"Quest to Make a Buck"?

      If the former, then he can sod off, the original design
      and creation of Star Trek was based on many of the same notions
      (Original stories, avoiding cliches, taking conventional wisdom
      for a turn) that you credit Whedon for.

      If the latter, then more power and luck to him, for as that
      original run of Star Trek found out:

      "Somebody needs to teach all these people the basics of good storytelling,"
      - What does that have to do with ratings?

  41. Latex is scary? by ellem · · Score: 3, Funny

    ``There'll be scary-ass humans,'' he said. ``I can make people that are scarier than anything you can put in latex.'' --Joss W

    What the Hell is this guy talking about? I say get Charisma Carpenter, Sarah Michelle Gellar and
    Alyson Hannigan in latex and have them make-out for a half hour every week.

    CC as Wonder Woman
    SMG as Cat Woman
    AH as Batgirl

    I'm watching that show right now... in my head... ohhh soo nice... latex... mmmmm

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:Latex is scary? by jafac · · Score: 2

      Now, I'm a totally straight guy.

      but lately, I don't know if it's her acting, or what, but SMG's make-out scenes have been really, well, un-sexy lately.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    2. Re:Latex is scary? by portnoy · · Score: 1

      That's because Buffy's relationship with Spike isn't about love, or lust, or even sex. It's just need, which isn't really a sexy thing.

      To be honest, the fact that SMG can convey these emotions so subtly is just amazing.

  42. Re:another frist p0st in the name of Kathryn Thurb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you know her name is Kathryn Thurber??

  43. Huh? by GreenJeepMan · · Score: 1

    "``It's wicked Joss-like,'' Fox Entertainment president Gail Berman said of Whedon's latest concept. ``It's not like any show set in space that I've ever seen.''"

    Ok, so either
    A: This guy hasn't seen much
    B: The series is going to suck

    There are only so many movies you can create about space and still say it is doing something new, I seriously dought this will be any good, regardless, this guy's resume speaks for itself.

    Or maybe I'm getting old, I grew up with Buck Rogers, Battle Star Galactica, Star Blazers and Robotech. Everything today seems a bit silly by comparison. Except Babylon 5 that is :-)

    1. Re:Huh? by mebarker · · Score: 1

      Have you watched Buck Rogers, Battle Star Galactica, Star Blazers or Robotech since you were a kid? They seem a bit silly by today's standards.

    2. Re:Huh? by GreenJeepMan · · Score: 1

      No I haven't so I can't argue my point very well. But I will ask by what means you mean silly? Special affects or plot?

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're right. And there are only so many movies you can create about life, love, fights, quests, etc. and still say it is doing something new. Maybe you're just getting sceptical. And that's not necessarily part of getting old. Not if you grew up watching Battle Star Galactica, anyway.

  44. It's wicked Joss-like by blamanj · · Score: 2

    He came up with a concept that's part Western, part space drama.

    Now there's an original concept. (groan)

    And the universe is a big, scary place just like high school.

    So the villian is going to be called Vice Principal?

    Buffy the Vampire Slayer creator Joss Whedon

    I guess the musical episode could be interesting, though...

  45. Consider reading "Fray", Whedon's comic book by BAM0027 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The man certainly can manipulate the visual medium(s). While I'm not a fan of the Buffy series, I know many who are entranced by it. I thought I'd give his first foray into comics a try and I've been very pleased with the story, the visual composition (paneling, etc...), and the quality of art (kudos to the artist).

    There have been 5 issues released so far (I just read #5 last night). He's got great pacing per issue as well as across a whole storyline. His characters are intriguing and complex and he uses relationships well.

    If you like Whedon's story telling via video, you should check out this book.

  46. Re:another frist p0st in the name of Kathryn Thurb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This took me a whole five minutes to find.

    Rob malda's GF's website & pic at the bottom

    -Dead Fart Warrior

  47. Highschool by davidhan · · Score: 1
    Ultimately, Whedon said, the new show will have the same moral center as ``Buffy'' and its ``Angel'' spinoff: ``Life is hard. People are good when they want to be. And the universe is a big, scary place just like high school.''

    Man, sounds like he's got still got 'issues' with high school.
  48. Be Current: John Ashcroft in Latex by idonotexist · · Score: 1

    Let's stick with the current Bush administration, ok?

    --
    "There ought to be limits to freedom"
  49. Uh... no. by bADlOGIN · · Score: 1

    The show is a success because of great plot writing and actual character development. If the "Great looking chicks" argument held water for Sci-Fi, then we'd all be talking about how excelent Dark Angel is (GAG!).

    --
    *** Sigs are a stupid waste of bandwidth.
  50. Why we watch Buffy by scott1853 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok guys, enough is enough. There's plenty of comments on the Buffy show lately. I think we can all drop the act.

    You know what I mean. We're not watching it for any sci-fi or horror reasons. It's obvious.

    Buffy will date freaks.

    And the lesbians don't hurt either

    1. Re:Why we watch Buffy by fm6 · · Score: 2
      Uh, no. So far we've seen here with a studly-but-moody vampire, a studly-but-troubled vampire wanabee, a studly-but-self-centered college guy, a studly-but-dimwitted soldier of fortune, a studly-but-secretly-wanting-to-destroy-the-world medical intern ...

      Oh yeah, and her current squeeze, the semi-defanged Spike, who's not quite studly, but certainly Hollywood pretty. Doesn't really count, she she's in denial about the whole relationship.

      Gad, nobody on Star Trek had such an interesting love life. Never mind B5!

  51. Joss is a Genious by truffle · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Buffy the Vampire Slayer...might as well be called Fluffy the Vampire Slayer. It's hard to take a show with such a silly premise, and a hottie like SMG as the main character, seriously.

    But seriously you should take it because Buffy has got some of the best damned writing on TV today, and it keeps getting better.

    Joss isn't just churning out the class-A stories, he's delving into new and exciting territory. While other shows consider themself to be forward thinking by including five seconds of girl-girl kissing, Buffy features a deep well developed relationship between Tara and Willow. This season's musical epsiode features exceptional music, vocals, and choreography. It was a total diversion from the standard Buffy format, it was incredibly good, and it leaves the viewer wondering what kind of genious could create something so different, so wonderful, and for just one episode.

    Joss.

    The man is a genious.

    Hopefully he won't have to throw in an angst-ridden geek character for Slashdot readers to appreciate the brilliance that is Joss.

    --

    ---
    I support spreading santorum
    1. Re:Joss is a Genious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obviously NOT a geniUS.

      Spelling counts, retard.

    2. Re:Joss is a Genious by Tychoma · · Score: 1

      Buffy the Vampire Slayer...might as well be called Fluffy the Vampire Slayer.

      Uhh, there is a Fluffy the Vampire Slayer.

      Check out Fluffy the English Vampire Slayer

      --
      Karma: Shitty (mostly due to American moderators)
  52. Bright asses... by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    I thought this was supposed to be a dark show. Fireflies are cute, not scary.

    If they have to name after the fact that its ass lights up (unlike every other ship out there?) how about giving it a scary name?

    Something like FLAMING MONKEY BUTT. Normally abbreviated to FMB unless they have a late time slot.

    ... actually, since that's often a sign of sexual arousal and a red light has long been a symbol of cathouses for the same reason, this would be a good theme for a show following a band of itinerant whores. But that would make it a cable show, something for Cinemax or maybe Showtime (when Wormhole X-treme's run ends).

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Bright asses... by jafac · · Score: 2

      I guess you never read the book "Firefly".

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    2. Re:Bright asses... by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      So what's your problem? That the ships aft will light up, and thus ruin the darkness? Or that the ships will be "cute" and thus prevent the show from being "dark"?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  53. Animated Buffy? by oni · · Score: 2

    That's funny, I thought there already was an animated buffy

    Isn't Devil Hunter Yoko what the show was based on anyway?

  54. Ripper? Chris Carter did that already... by Lester67 · · Score: 1

    It was called Millennium.

  55. Rip off! by Kengineer · · Score: 1

    Tentatively titled ``Firefly,'' the new ensemble series takes place 500 years in the future and revolves around the crew of a ``small, incredibly mobile spaceship whose aft end lights up,'' Whedon said -- hence the name.

    Anyone else smell a rip off?

    Seriously though, I really liked this show. The FIRST time I saw it, when it was called RED DWARF!! And the ship was STARBUG, not f#^#$'n FIREFLY, and it was 3 million years in the future and not 500. And the dark place was a nebula full of GELFS!!

    - insert witty line here

  56. BIg Fox Blowouts by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 2

    Remember the hype for Harsh Realm a few years ago? Fox ran the premiere once on a Friday night. Monday morning they decided to cancel it due to low ratings. They ran the second episode that week then the series vanished.

    How is somebody like Whedon supposed to do any better? It took Whedon, like Carter, several years on a "second-class TV network" before their work grew beyond a cult following.

    I'm sceptical such a thing will be allowed time to grow on Fox.

    Anybody seen "The Tick" after the first 2 or 3 episodes? I didn't think so.

  57. Joss Whedon is a trashman by simon333 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Am I the only one who is completely sick of unbelievable heroin pseudo hero's? Buffy sucks, the movie sucked and the series sucks even worse. Angel sucks. Take one beautiful babe, put a barcode on her neck, do some trick photo kicks and you've got a series. bla!

    I know women need role models and that's fine but why do they have to try and reach everybody between the age of 16 and 80, male or female?

    Don't you remember Dukes of Hazard and Charlies Angels? Separate the male/female fantasies and you're in business. Try to blend them together and you get Star Trek Voyager. Need I say more?

    I will say more. I think it all started with Laura Croft. ..but that's just me and I'm just right.

    - Sidog

  58. Joss Whedon has such a great Sci-Fi track record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    After all, he wrote that magnificent "ALIEN RESURRECTION" movie.

    "you are a beautiful.. beautiful butterfly"

  59. Jonathan Creek by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    That sounds like Jonathan Creek, another BBC show. Sorta a cross between Penn & Teller and Columbo. (The hero, JC, is the guy behind a well-known magician. After hooking up with an author sent to profile the magician, they investigate "paranormal" events and write them up as a series of well-selling books.)

    The series is highly regarded in the usual Anglophilic PBS circles, but I've found it takes several viewings to figure out what's going on. The problem is the language, not the plot. In a BritCom it rarely matters if you miss the subtle points of an off-handed comment, but in a mystery series those are usually the key clues!

    It's possible that Ripper covers the same ground, but the synopsis is so close that it's inevitable that at least some people will confuse the two series unless they've seen both.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  60. Be a man! (or woman as the case may be) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got a beef, spell it out! Don't hide behind pansy-ass sarcasm. You wanna rag on Fox or the shows, do it, but at least have the guts to be specific.

  61. I have three words for you... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Joseph Michael Straczynski.

    If there were more epic stories like Babylon 5 on TV, it would actually be worth watching.

    Actually, Farscape and Stargate SG-1 aren't too bad, either. Sure, there are plenty of real bad sci-fi shows, but this are all on the Big 5 (NBC/ABC/CBS/FOX/UPN), where corporate marketting reigns. On the channels that don't have to rely on people with B&W TVs using an attenna to get their sitcoms, they have enough intelligence to find shows based on good stories, and not a short-term big-hit injection (ie: good pilots, bad episodes) to get their finacial high.

    Series like Babylon 5 and Farscape survive because it's a good long-term story that lasts a long time (and gets people hooked for a good amount of Nelson cash flow), and the channels that host them are willing to let them go past their 13 episodes, even if they aren't suddenly the #1 show in the universe. (The main corporates just won't settle for anything less, anymore. If you don't believe me, just look at UPNs first season, where they canned EVERY SINGLE SHOW except for their Voyager cash cow.)

    1. Re:I have three words for you... by NulDevice · · Score: 1

      JMS is decent at the tv-show big-picture type stuff. He should NEVER be allowed near dialogue again in his life. There's a time when a creator needs to back off and let other writers take control. JMS finally did for the 5th season, letting us have Neil Gaiman's "Day of the Dead", but after 30 or so straight episodes of JMS-hacked dialogue...yikes.

      Use subtext, man, subtext! You don't always need to have a metaphor-talking alien!

      I've been watching the shadow war reruns and the dialogue just lays there like a dead animal. Even Trek knew how to use subtext in a conversation - characters could be obviously talking about something different than what they were talking about. B5, Crusade - they were always speaking exposition, except for Kosh who just used heavy-handed metaphor.

      While I religiously watched the show, it was very obvious to me that this was not going to be the vehicle to "save" sci-fi TV and bring it to the masses. It was too hackneyed in too many ways to be anything other than a cult show.

      --

      ----
      "I used to listen to Null Device before they sold out."

  62. Be a man! (or woman as the case may be) by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    A rather bold request for an Anonymous Coward...

  63. Re:I think that you're thinking of "Dark Angel" by Psykechan · · Score: 1

    Angel is a spin off of Buffy. It's a darker, more angst-filled show and well worth watching. (not that BtVS isn't, mind you)

    The mere fact that you've confused the shows means that you haven't watched it and should not criticize it.

    Psykechan

  64. Contact him! by russellamiller · · Score: 1

    Having listened to Joss at a con, he's a pretty cool, with-it kind of guy. Call the production office, let him know you want to work with him.

    And good luck.
    It's tough out there.

  65. Buffy, a damned good show by osgeek · · Score: 2

    Before a couple of weeks ago, I never had seen the original BtVS movie. Before October, I'd never watched a single episode of the series. It just sounded stupid, and I thought that it was some dumb teen-chick show like Charmed.

    Then, a few months ago, FX started airing back-to-back episodes of Buffy, and I happened to watch a couple of hours of it. I was completely amazed at how good it was, and mortified that I haven't been watching it over the years.

    Thanks to my VCR, though, I'm almost all caught up. It's an excellent series, and the only scifi show I've ever seen that can so consistently give me a good laugh from the clever dialogue (in addition to when Spike makes some dread proclamation of doom, then proceeds to get zapped or falls into an open grave.)

    Excellent stuff.

  66. Which Roddenberry? by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Sounds more like Roddenberry with every description...
    Which one? Saint Gene, Patron of Trekkies, Inventor of All Things Wise and Original? I rather suspect he never actually existed.

    There's also Recycled Roddenbery, the failed media mogul, who was responsible for a stream of half-baked TV and movie projects, none of which would have seen the light of day without his reputation as the "creator" of you-know-what.

    But you're probably thinking of Soapbox Roddenbery, who wrote lots of preachy TV scripts, and aspired to become a producer, and thought "Wagon Train Goes to Mars" (better known as Star Trek) would make his reputation as such. He's widely credited with bringing "hard" SF to television, but that's bogus -- he just employed the people who did.

    1. Re:Which Roddenberry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek != "hard" SF

      Bad science. Bad science. Bad science.

      Completely implausible. And let's not forget a universe populated chiefly by aliens who look exactly like humans, only with pointy ears or funny foreheads.

      Cheesy, hokey, quasi-Sci-Fi at best.

  67. Straczynski? Get real by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Gag. Straczynski scripts are full of clumsy exposition and dialogue worthy of a badly-dubbed kung-fu movie. His stories are so corny..., oh well, bring on the flames.

  68. Hey Wil by fm6 · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's easy to miss the fact that CleverNickName is the /. handle for the Wil Wheaton, this week's poster child for Fame Doesn't Pay the Rent. Hey Will, how about a distinctive sig? Otherwise your long series of "still seeking work" posts (which I hope represent self-deprecating humor) will be overlooked!

    I'm tempted to ask why they didn't bring in Wesley to get Voyager home. He was the expert on Going Real Fast, after all. But I won't ask. I suspect an honest answer would get you sued!

    1. Re:Hey Wil by Suppafly · · Score: 2
      It's easy to miss the fact that CleverNickName is the /. handle for the Wil Wheaton, this week's poster child for Fame Doesn't Pay the Rent. Hey Will, how about a distinctive sig? Otherwise your long series of "still seeking work" posts (which I hope represent self-deprecating humor) will be overlooked!


      Not really.. by now everyone knows that wil is cleavernickname.. he's been interviewed by /. before and everytime he posts a comment someone comes along and informs us all who he is.. nearly everything he posts is modded up to +5 because everyone thinks he's cool.. if he loses some points here or there because someone who doesn't keep current on /. somehow gets modpoints oh well.. I seriously doubt that he needs your help or anyone else's

    2. Re:Hey Wil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put your Geek Code in your .sig, it's on your site...

  69. Yeah. This from a Buffy fan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever. B5 is to Buffy what a fine French resteraunt is to McDonalds. But then, some people do so love their junk food. . . .

  70. this sucked the first time around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when it was called 'Dark Angel'! :p

    though Jessica Alba is still one of the hottest girls on television.

    props to David Spade for biting his style.

  71. French Kiss by fm6 · · Score: 2
    French restaurant? That's actually pretty apt, if you mean that B5 is like one of those places that ladles on thick creamy sauces without regard to digestibility.

    As for Buffy, you speak from ignorance. A better analogy would be one of those storefront ethnic restaurants that you're afraid to try, but which turns out to be pretty good, once you get used to the strange flavors.

  72. Tastes by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Hey now, I like Wesley Crusher...
    I always wanted to like him. The idea of a space explorers who took their families along was one of the few things I really like about TNG. Pity the writers didn't know what to do with it.

    And liver....
    Yum, drool. Never understood why nobody likes it. Alas, instant arterial block.

    and cow's brains
    Too salty for me! But have you tried tongue?

    and Anne from "Weakest Link"
    Oh Jeez, the things Hollywood does to avoid hiring actual writers and actors...

    1. Re:Tastes by Elektrik2001 · · Score: 1

      >Hey now, I like Wesley Crusher...
      >>I always wanted to like him. The idea of a >>space explorers who took their families along >>was one of the few things I really like about >>TNG. Pity the writers didn't know what to do >>with it.

      Heh...

      >And liver....
      >>Yum, drool. Never understood why nobody likes >>it. Alas, instant arterial block

      Am I the only one seeing the obvious sarcasm in my statements? =]

      >and Anne from "Weakest Link"
      >>Oh Jeez, the things Hollywood does to avoid >>hiring actual writers and actors...

      Heh...I'd like to try out for the "Weakest Link" and at the last second, dress like her and go on stage and start ripping on her-frigid old.....

  73. get Buffy and Angel on DVD by webwench_72 · · Score: 1

    Buying on DVD is more cost-effective -- unfortunately, Buffy DVDs get released for the UK zone long before they get released for the US -- if they have even been released for the US DVD zone yet. The first season of Angel was also just released on DVD. Try the UK version of Amazon.com.

    --

  74. Season 4 bit, but it got better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Season 4 started off weak and got worse, but Season 5 picked up again and contained some of the best episodes to date. In particular, the introduction of Dawn gave the series a whole new focus.

    I've only seen the first few episodes of Season 6 so far, but it's a strong start.

    So if you ran screaming during Season 4 (and I don't really blame you) you can come back now, it's safe. :)

  75. Hmm. by loraksus · · Score: 2

    Enterprise = anti-trek.
    'nuff said.

    though perhaps my opinion isn't worth a damn because I stopped watching that putrid shit after the second episode (ooh! goodie! lets learn a language in .... 20 minutes!)

    BTW, who is going to top Buffy? (Oh.. fuck they found a place for Britney Spears, tho that might not be that bad...)

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  76. Whadeva. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    Ultimately, Whedon said, the new show will have the same moral center as ``Buffy'' and its ``Angel'' spinoff: ``Life is hard. People are good when they want to be. And the universe is a big, scary place just like high school.''

    Yeah, but what about the hot pants?

    I mean, I ain't going to watch anything like that unless it has space chicks in hot pants. After all, they gotta be hotter and carry bigger guns than Aeryn Sun, and still avoid being cheezy. I see a grim prognosis on this one. Farscape is still some of the best writing around. Space is "just like high school"... hmmmmm.

    Good Luck! You're going to need it.

  77. I don't care. by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    He is bitchin' all the way to the bank about these movies... so if he has a prob with the way that Hollywood does him, then he needs to get out. Geeeez. He can't have it both ways, y'know, big time writer and not prostituted by the studios.

    It is the price you pay for fame. If you think that sincerity is big in Hollywood, you need to see press junket talk in an Electronic Press Kit for a dog movie. Get used to getting exploited. Expect a big smile with the director of Ishtar saying, "this movie is the best I have ever done!"

    Also, he was responsible for the basic ideas in Alien Ressurection, so that whole "dialog by actors" crap he is spewing about others destroying the movie is doo-doo. The concepts in Alien Resurrection were horrible... and no matter how he spins it, he is directly responsible for that. Mutant-Alien Sigourney Weaver. That is the worst idea ever.

    Please. Even X-men was a direct comic rip... and not a whole new script. It looks almost shot for shot to specific comic scenes that I can remember. Take credit for that.

  78. He is out by Gorimek · · Score: 2

    He is bitchin' all the way to the bank about these movies... so if he has a prob with the way that Hollywood does him, then he needs to get out. Geeeez. He can't have it both ways, y'know, big time writer and not prostituted by the studios.

    Actually, I'm pretty sure he has quit Hollywood entirely, and is only working for TV now. In TV, the writer is king.

  79. Re:Ripper? Chris Carter did that already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it sucked. big time.

    The only reason it lasted at all was 'cause it was popular with SUV buyers.

  80. LEXX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its already the Anti-Trek.

  81. But the fans are chicks by Gorimek · · Score: 2

    You have no idea how wrong you are... I used to think that too before I watched the show. I even felt slightly dirty for tuning in to it. That quickly was replaced by stunned fascination for the storys, characters and humor. It's the best show on TV, burdened by a silly name and a small network.

    Most the fans are female. I went to a small Buffy convention recently, and found myself to be the only guy of 16 participants.

  82. Anti-Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean Babylon 5?

    Already been done.

    Buffy and Angel. Heh. They're only popular for teh same reasons Baywatch is popular.

    And let me tell you - it isn't the 'great plot'. ;)

  83. Anti Trek = Blakes 7 by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
    I like the idea of another SF series which is not overwhelmed with niceness and fuzzyness, where the scariest of foes (eg. kingons or borg) become the cuddliest of companions after a few episodes.


    Blakes 7 was most definitely anti-trek, with the totalitarian empire of the Federation having its symbol as Trek Federation symbol on its side. The great writing, some good acting and some good characters made up for a low budget. Can you imagine a dialogue like this between heroes in any current American SF series:
    "I'm in front, I should have the gun"
    "No, I've got the gun, that's why you're in front"

    1. Re:Anti Trek = Blakes 7 by dajalas · · Score: 1

      The best line from Blakes 7 was Avon's: "Staying with this group requires egregious stupidity of which I am no longer capable.

      OTOH, the series finale was a real downer.

  84. Where "Buffy" went wrong by parvati · · Score: 2

    And perhaps this is due to Whedon's shifting attention, but ...

    IMHO, Buffy has fallen into the same trap that the X-Files did. Both shows used to be bitingly funny--even though there were deep dark moments (especially in Buffy), there were always enough off-handed humorous remarks so that the shows weren't truly depressing week after week. The beauty was that in the same episode where Angel turned evil and tortured Giles (and etc.), there were still lines that made me laugh out loud. However, in the past season or two (and a bit longer for the X-Files), it's as if the writers have been trying far too hard to make a point or develop plot or something ... I'm someone who enjoys a good wallow in misery sometimes, but ultimately tv is about entertainment.

    And, of course, "Angel" has fallen prey to the baby-trap that killed off "Mad About You."

  85. Re:I loved Alien 3! by aWalrus · · Score: 1

    Hey! I agree with you in that Alien 4 was pretty much... crap. But Alien 3 was great! I've always thought that what makes that series so good is that each is a different genre (Alien - terror, Aliens - action, Alien 3 - suspense/drama), and each is very good in its own right (well, except for the fourth one with that hideous mammal alien thingie)

    --
    Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
  86. Spider-Man can! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not quite sure who would win in a fight though. Lucy Lawless is quite butch as Xena, but Buffy has super-powers, while Xena is just well-trained.

    IMHO, Spider-man would butcher them both.. at the same time! He's got this spider-sense you see, and that makes it impossible to surprise him. I even saw him take The Incredible Hulk once. Now THAT's a feat! Of course, he had a little luck too.. ;*)

    Xena, Babylon 5, Charmed, Buffy: The Vampire Slayer, Stargate, Enterprise, Voyager, X-files... How can you stand it? Don't you read books or play with your computers?? Don't you see this entertainment as dope to the masses? Don't you fancy taking the red pill, wake up and get a life, instead using the TV as an excuse to not live life. All these series are the same quality as those your mothers are indulging: Semi-real/fictious documentaries about rape, child-swapping and molestation, drug-abuse, sickness and death. They feed you what you crave. You crave without knowing how to deal with desire and fear. And so it continues without ever being resolved. Then you die and wonder what life was all about.

    I can't tell _you_ what life is all about, but I would recommend turning off the TV and seek out things you don't want to do - what you avoid.

    I wouldn't speak up, if it wasn't for the pure low-quality of these series. It's perfectly okay to watch now and then, but if you follow each episode eagerly, THAT's disturbing! ;) So I have to speak up. Don't listen if you don't want to. I know I'm wrong, and I know I'm right too.

    - Your Neighbourly Concerned AC

    1. Re:Spider-Man can! by jafac · · Score: 2

      you forgot Special Unit 2!
      (and please, don't even include that crap show "Charmed" - I'm too busy attending Opera performances, reading Dostyevsky, and climbing Mt. McKinley to care about that damned piece of shit!)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  87. Red Shirt by wiredog · · Score: 2
    But, if Wil is a red shirt, he'd be the security goon.

    Ever watched Classic Trek?

    1. Re:Red Shirt by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • But, if Wil is a red shirt, he'd be the security goon

      Sigh. It's a giggle either way; in fact, it's even more cathartic if Wil is the Security Goon and gets to execute J. Spunky Teenager. And both security and engineering wore red shirts in TOS. And "Red Shirt" is now just a generic term for any doomed character that gets one line like "I'll just take a quick look behind this polystyrene rock - AARGH!". And don't forget that pedantry and nit picking never wins you friends - look at Wesley "no mates" Crusher. ;-p

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  88. Region 1 by Tychoma · · Score: 1

    Region 1 Buffy season 1 DVDs are due to be released sometime in spring 2002 in the states. By which time UK, Europe & Australia will be up to season 4 of Buffy & season 2 of Angel.

    --
    Karma: Shitty (mostly due to American moderators)
  89. Re:I loved Alien 3! by rnb · · Score: 1

    I guess I shouldn't dredge this back up, but the number one reason that I didn't like Alien 3 was because it didn't stay faithful to Aliens at all. Hicks and Newt dying in the first five minutes of Alien 3? Ripley dying in the last five minutes? It completely nullified Aliens. All that running and fighting and trying to get away from LV-426 ended up being for nothing. Hey, if the people who played Hicks and Newt don't want to or can't come back to play them again, that's fine. Find some way around it, I'm not upset that they weren't in this movie. Just that killing everyone off makes a really great movie (Aliens) a complete waste of time as far as the storyline goes.

  90. If I wanted friends by wiredog · · Score: 2
    I wouldn't hang out here. At least, not anymore. Too damn many trolls.

    You're right, it is funnier if Wil is the Security Goon. I see it now, Wil the Security Goon shoots Annoying Teenager, looks behind styrofoam rock, says "AAArgh!".

  91. Heinliens books included Hot Chix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I take issue with the line
    "bastardizes people like Heinlein.
    AC is implying that Heinlien's work isn't sullied with sexy, bright, scantily clad women like they are in Whedon's stories.
    Maybe if he read any of Heinlein's books, AC would know that sex was part of his work.
    • Stranger in a strange land - everything goes! Orgies, cults, multiple marriages, gay and straight sex.
    • Friday - Strong, beautiful, scantily clad female lead. Threesomes, multiple partners, homosexual references.
    • The cat who walks through walls - Orgies, multiple marriages, gay and straight sex.
    This is only a partial list - most of his books included some sex. Heinlein wasn't afraid to recognize that the sexuality of his female characters didn't weaken or exploit them. It made them more human, just like Whedon's characters.
  92. Bad Science! Bad! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    I basically agree. But saying "bad science makes bad SF" is a little simplistic. Non-hack SF doesn't always stick to "good" science -- that would rule out most of the speculation that is the genre's main attraction. But it's disciplined speculation.

    Also, "good" science can quickly turn to "bad" science, because science is always changing. But that doesn't turn good SF to bad SF. Much of Heinlein's best work is set in a solar system populated by ancient Martians and swamp-dwelling Venusians. The idea that Mars and Venus are habitable has been debunked for decades, but books like Podkayne of Mars and Between Planets are still read -- and still considered "hard" SF. This comes from the structure and integrity of Heinlein's work, not from the specific science he employed.

    The 60s Star Trek series had some sense of this. Roddenbery deserves some credit for this, though not nearly as much as his fans (worshippers?) like to give him. And once GR left the scene, there was no hope of preserving any kind of discipline or structure to the concept. Indeed, Rick Berman and his cohorts seem unusually contemptuous of this sort of concern, even by Hollywood standards.