Slashdot Mirror


Using MEMS to Miniaturize Mobile Phones

securitas writes: "The NY Times has a feature on using microelectro-mechanical systems (MEMS) in cell phones to replace bulky passive components like the filters, resonators and duplexers that make up most of the size of today's phones. In theory, they say, you could have a cell phone in a ring on your finger. Besides making everyone seem like James Bond, a ring-phone would give new meaning to the phrase 'Talk to the hand.'"

135 comments

  1. Coltan by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    Does this technology use Coltan?

    Frankly, after seeing what is going on in the Congo, I feel ashamed for even owning a cell phone.

    .

    1. Re:Coltan by viking099 · · Score: 1

      how about some more information on this? I've never seen anything about cell phones and the Congo...

    2. Re:Coltan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...how about some more information on this? I've never seen anything about cell phones and the Congo...

      Time for some AC karma-wh0ring.

      http://abcnews.go.com/sections/nightline/DailyNe ws /coltan_explainer.html

      "Columbite-tantalite -- coltan for short -- is a dull metallic ore found in major quantities in the eastern areas of Congo. When refined, coltan becomes metallic tantalum, a heat-resistant powder that can hold a high electrical charge. These properties make it a vital element in creating capacitors, the electronic elements that control current flow inside miniature circuit boards."

    3. Re:Coltan by Hal-9001 · · Score: 5, Informative

      For people like me who had no idea what coltan is, see this article. The short version is that columbite-tantalite (coltan) is an ore than can be refined into tantalum, which apparently is a very good dielectric for making capacitors. This means that it's not just in cell phones but probably in every electronic device you own.

      The controversy over coltan and the Congo seems to revolve around two issues. One is that Congo's neighbors seem to be exploiting its coltan resources, i.e. smuggling coltan and exporting it as their own product. Another is the environmental impact, since illegal mining operations probably care as much about the environmental impact they have as they do about the law.

      All of this so far is off-topic, but if rf MEMs could replace capacitive filters and resonators, it could help reduce the demand for coltan. This feeble attempt to be on-topic is purely speculative, though, as I am not a wireless engineer and the NYT article lacks details about the materials being used in these devices.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    4. Re:Coltan by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      Yeah information is pretty hard to find.

      It is pretty scary. I hadn't heard anything about it either. I guess the companies do all they can to play down the issue, much like the diamond company.

    5. Re:Coltan by powerbarr · · Score: 1

      Pretty easy to find on google. Go to article

    6. Re:Coltan by Gordonjcp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All of this so far is off-topic, but if rf MEMs could replace capacitive filters and resonators, it could help reduce the demand for coltan. This feeble attempt to be on-topic is purely speculative, though, as I am not a wireless engineer and the NYT article lacks details about the materials being used in these devices.

      Tantalum tends to be used in low frequency and power circuits. Quite honestly, if you didn't need a mobile phone the size of a domino, you could make them a bit bigger and use plain ordinary electrolytic capacitors instead.

      Of course, they use other nasty chemicals, so you just can't win...

    7. Re:Coltan by Drakin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The proper question is does the technology use tantalum, which is the useful part of coltan.

      Funny thing... Africa isn't the major producer of the stuff. Australia is, then Africa, Brazil, Thailand, China, Canada and Malayshia.

    8. Re:Coltan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the environmental impact, since illegal mining operations probably care as much about the environmental impact they have as they do about the law

      Actually, the environmental problem in this case is somewhat odd: there is nothing for the miners to eat in the Congo, so they kill and eat the gorillas that inhabit the region. Gorillas are already endangered so this is clearly not good.

    9. Re:Coltan by markmoss · · Score: 2

      if you didn't need a mobile phone the size of a domino, you could make them a bit bigger and use plain ordinary electrolytic capacitors instead.

      Not quite. Aluminum electrolytics don't respond well at high frequencies, and in modern electronics usually the power supply filter caps have to handle quite high frequencies, since the power drawn by components varies rapidly. Ceramic caps take care of the highest frequencies, but don't store enough charge to cover everything. Electrolytics store lots of charge, but don't let it out fast enough. Tantalums are in-between, and quite often perfect.

      The rising production of cell phones did cause a severe shortage of tantalums a year or two ago. One of our customers was then designing a board with a 233MHz Pentium, where size and weight didn't matter. So instead of tantalums, they used about a dozen medium size electrolytics in parallel -- this was massively more capacitance than needed, but by adding together the slight high frequency response of all those electrolytics, they got the same effect as a couple of good tantalums. Only trouble was, when you turned power on charging up all those caps for the first time put a strain on the power supply!

  2. Great.... by tfurrows · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now we're going to have a bunch of yuppies talking to their fingers while they drive.

    Does this mean people are going to get pulled over for talking on their cell (in areas where it's illegal), when all they were really doing was picking their nose?

    What an injustice... what a travisty....

    1. Re:Great.... by sockmonkeybob · · Score: 1

      What if someone has fat fingers? How do they dial? Do you have to get your ring phone sized? Why not just do an ear piece enabled with voice recognition software.

      "Call home." It calls home.
      "Answer phone." It answers phone.
      etc.

      Seems a lot easier...

      ryan

    2. Re:Great.... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Well most of these places its legal to use a hands free cell phone while driving. So just keep that ring finger on the wheel while your talking into it!

  3. Do we absolutely need another reason for... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    The phrase, "talk to the hand" ? Wired.com had an article just the other day, about a glove that translated sign language to spoken english. And a few weeks before that, I swear I saw yet another news article saying the same thing. This is getting on my nerves, I don't like my vocabulary corrupted by Jerry Springerish cliches.

    1. Re:Do we absolutely need another reason for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is getting on my nerves, I don't like my vocabulary corrupted by Jerry Springerish cliches.


      Well then we'll just have to kick you to the curb.

      YOU DON'T KNOW ME! YOU DON'T KNOW ME!

  4. Dildos by October_30th · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Imagine the huge impact this technology could have in the sex toy industry.

    A vibrator in a wedding ring should keep the "little missus" happy in a discrete way... ;-)

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  5. Ring phones by Restil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even with electronics that use a fraction of what today's phones use, to reduce the size of the phone will reduce the size of the battery you can carry with it. A ring phone can't feasibly hold more than a watch battery.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
    1. Re:Ring phones by The+Gardener · · Score: 2, Informative

      . . . to reduce the size of the phone will reduce the size of the battery . . .

      "Luckily," he says dryly, "the article answers this very issue."

      Indirectly, better filtering helps reduce the size of a cellphone because lower-quality filtering results in a signal loss that is corrected by more amplification, which drains power. More power means bigger batteries and extra electronics within the phone.

      "The ultimate benefit," Mr. Mueller said, "is a smaller, lighter phone that works well and works longer between charges."

      The Gardener

      --
      --
    2. Re:Ring phones by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With the power reductoin that will come from this, maybe they can power it from your body movement, like a watch? or from the bodies own electrical "aura"? Or from your shows, and the electrical signal is carried through your body?
      Or a solar hat! I say that last one because I would love the fidora to come back.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Ring phones by seann · · Score: 1

      ever see the saint?
      and that phone he used?
      that was a pda combination?
      I want one.
      When are we going to get those?

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    4. Re:Ring phones by Gaijin42 · · Score: 2

      That is a real phone from nokia. You can have it now. There are also several palm/phone combinations available.

    5. Re:Ring phones by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Indirectly, better filtering helps reduce the size of a cellphone because lower-quality filtering results in a signal loss that is corrected by more amplification, which drains power.

      That would be fine if your phone only received. To transmit, you need real power (5W?) which drains even palm-sized batteries fast. And I don't believe that the driver transistors and filters needed on the transmitter can shrink that small anyway.

      Cell-phones have to have receive always turned on (so it can receive a call at any time), but when idle they only turn on transmit for a few milliseconds at a time to identify themselves to the network. My wife's cell phone batteries last for days in this mode. But when she starts talking, a full charge goes in half an hour.

    6. Re:Ring phones by juhaz · · Score: 1

      To specify the second poster, phone/pda in Saint was Nokia Communicator 9000 - rather old one, by the way, has been out for years, and they have already made several new versions, major updates being 9110 and 9210, I'm not sure whether they are GSM 900 or 900/1800 phones, but are quite real. Be prepared to shell out quite a few bucks for it, though, here in Finland 9210 costs about one thousand euros.

    7. Re:Ring phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get a Samsung I300. It's about $400--a color Palm with 8MB and a SprintPCS phone in one tiny package. Even though it's an outaded Palm, it's still a dope combination. And the size is right.

  6. One Ring to Bind them? by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, One ring says I'm committed to my wife. The other Ring shows my commitment to technology!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:One Ring to Bind them? by sporty · · Score: 2

      And in darkness bind him? Oi vey. :)

      a:"I'm not dead, I'm married."
      b:"No, you're married, not dead is how it really is."

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:One Ring to Bind them? by duct_tape_n_wd40 · · Score: 1

      The other Ring shows my commitment to technology!

      Upon your honour and cold iron?

      --
      .siggy .siggy .siggy .siggy hoi hoi hoi - Prosit!
  7. Battery for ring phone by maf212 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You will still never get around the battery. Unless you locate ist somewhere else on your body.

    --
    --Note to self. Add witty sig here, someday...
    1. Re:Battery for ring phone by DShor · · Score: 1

      Maybe some sort of kinetic batery could be used like in watches...

      --


      Why is it that people always hear what I say, and not what I mean?
  8. What happen if... by kevinadi · · Score: 2, Funny

    during talking to your ring you accidentally swallow it. I wonder what will the other person hear.

    1. Re:What happen if... by NTSwerver · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that....the other day I was having a conversation on my cellphone with a friend - he had called me while I was in a store - I left the store and opened my car door to get in. While trying to open the car door with handfulls of shopping and the cell phone wedged under my shoulder, the phone slipped and fell directly through the grates of a drain and into the water below. When I spoke to my friend later he said he heard a splash then muffled, under-water-sounding cries (me swearing loudly). So, I guess it would sound similar to that if someone swallowed a phone! BTW: the phone is supplied by my company, so I got a nice new one :-)

      --
      -----------------------
      Moderator's essentials
    2. Re:What happen if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you made the phone into a larger size toungue or lip piercing. I would imagine that to be an interesting conversation..

      untill it shorts out on someones braces someday..
      ouch

  9. Embedded phones.. by Evanrude · · Score: 1

    Something like this would be excellent for having the phone embedded right in your head.
    Now if they just had some kind of thought-based dialing system...

    --

    ~.Evanrude
    1. Re:Embedded phones.. by The+Gardener · · Score: 1

      Now if they just had some kind of thought-based dialing system...

      So, if I'm with my wife, but start thinking about my girlfriend, suddenly I'm dialing her? I can see a downside here . . .

      The Gardener

      --
      --
    2. Re:Embedded phones.. by HCase · · Score: 1

      If you change implant service providers are you going to need a new one put in?

  10. and don't forget... by NTSwerver · · Score: 1


    log/pass = password/password

    --
    -----------------------
    Moderator's essentials
    1. Re:and don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankyou ! (I'ld forgotten) :)

  11. I am thinking more along the lines by TheViffer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    of implants into the skull.

    Gives the term "ringing of the ears" a whole new meaning.

    Would suck though if you forgot to plug yourself in at night. Warrenty work might get quite expensive also. (sorry, your HMO does not cover this)

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  12. MEMS are cool! (warning not an original joke) by Emugamer · · Score: 2, Redundant

    An American, a German and a Japanese guy are golfing one day and, at the
    third hole, they hear a phone ring. The American excuses himself, puts
    his left thumb to his ear and his left pinky finger to his mouth and
    proceeds to have a phone conversation. When he is done, he looks at the
    other two and says, "Oh, that's the latest American technology in cell
    phones. I have a chip in my thumb and one in my pinky and the antenna is
    in my hat. Great stuff, huh?" They continue golfing until the ninth
    hole when, again, they hear a phone ring. The German tilts his head to
    one side and proceeds to have a conversation with someone in German.
    When he finishes, he explains to the other two that he has the latest in
    German cell phone technology. "A chip in my tooth, a chip in my ear and
    the antenna has been inserted into my spine...Ah, the wonders of German
    know-how!" At the thirteenth hole, a phone rings again and upon hearing
    it, the Japanese guy disappears into some nearby bushes. The German and
    the American look at each other and then walk over and peer into the
    bushes. In the middle of the bushes is the Japanese guy, squatting with
    his pants down around his ankles. "What on earth are you doing?!" asks
    the American. The Japanese guy looks up and replies, "Waiting for a
    fax."

    1. Re:MEMS are cool! (warning not an original joke) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehe....like it.

      pity you'll get modded down for daring to have a sense of humor though.

  13. Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a Beowulf cluster of these?

  14. yah by TheRain · · Score: 1

    Besides making everyone seem like James Bond, a ring-phone would give new meaning to the phrase 'Talk to the hand.'"

    that was a really lame joke. I'm sorry I repeated it.

    thank you.

    --
    Please help! I'm stuck inside my virtual reality headset!
  15. From what? by Toby+Truman · · Score: 1
    Miniaturize them from what? Cell phones are so small these days I'm surprised people can even find them in their pockets along with their keys, change, and whatever.

    I say bring back the big manly phones that look like radio handsets!

  16. Even more fragile phones? Woot.... by FileNotFound · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem I have...erm...had with small phones is that they're terribly fragile. It's as if they're expected to be carried in a padded purse or something. Makes your wonder why they even made it so small if you need carry those little phones in bulky thick plastic belt clips etc.

    Once they make a small phone like that out of something nice and hard, whatever it is, I'll be happy.

    For example, the Motorola i1000plus is quite durable, although big. Now compar it to a StarTec, smaller phone, but put the belt clip on and it's just as big. Don't even try to wear it without the clip. It's ultra fragile. On the other hand I've had the i1000 in my pocket, no clip no protector nothing for quite some time and no problems at all.

    What good is a cell phone 'ring' if it's broken?

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    1. Re:Even more fragile phones? Woot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold is a pretty soft metal, but I don't see a whole lot of dinged up wedding bands. I guess you'd want to avoid getting into fisticuffs with a concrete wall.

    2. Re:Even more fragile phones? Woot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to have a lot of experience with the Motorola phones.

      I had a i1000, which was weak. 90% of the users in our office had to RMA their handsets because the hinge cracks.

      The StarTac users had no such problems. My StarTac has been in service for 4 years (sold between friends a few times). It finally got a slight crack in the case from dropping it.

      The TimePort (similiar to the StarTac) are pretty stable, but I've known 3 people to have damaged the antenneas. It's weaker than the StarTac's antennea.

      My i90c is beautiful. It's as wide as a StarTac, and only slightly thicker. *MUCH* smaller than the i1000. It fits in my pocket if I don't feel like wearing it in it's clip (like going to clubs or to the beach).

      Motorola has a smaller one, half the width of a StarTac. I've known a few people in Europe with them, and they were *VERY* happy with them. The providers I've used here in the states don't offer it, or I would have probably already bought one. Motorola's site show it as the v series 60g.

      There is a limit to what consumers will accept. People don't like a phone they can't hold, or more importantly they can't hold on their shoulder to talk hands-free. The V series 60g already proves they can have a very small phone, but people like something larger. Even home phone handsets are nothing more than a microphone and speaker with a cord to the base that does the work. No one wants a phone that's smaller than a standard handset.

      They may get smaller as consumer attitudes change, but for the time being they're a size that consumers like.

  17. MEMS are much cooler then this by Emugamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MEMS will have so many different uses inside of your body from doing things such as an insulin pump (imagine never having to take insulin shots) to fixing congenital heart defects without such invasive surgery. This seems like an interesting but rather fluffy use of it at this time. Plus if you think about it, cell phones are so annoying now, imagine it if they were all built into your body... Shaking someone's hand whose phone is set to vibrate mode and they get an incoming call?

    1. Re:MEMS are much cooler then this by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2
      This seems like an interesting but rather fluffy use of it at this time.

      Yeah, but this might be a way to make MEMS mainstream. I imagine your insulin pump would be much cheaper if it contained the same technology as a cell-phone.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    2. Re:MEMS are much cooler then this by onion2k · · Score: 2

      imagine never having to take insulin shots

      Not being a diabetic, thats actually pretty easy..

    3. Re:MEMS are much cooler then this by Emugamer · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but this might be a way to make MEMS mainstream. I imagine your insulin pump would be much cheaper if it contained the same technology as a cell-phone.
      I accept that arguement and understand the implications of mems mainstreaming but do you really think the technophobes of this era would accept Mems phones over insulin pumps as mainstream?
    4. Re:MEMS are much cooler then this by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2
      do you really think the technophobes of this era would accept Mems phones over insulin pumps as mainstream?

      I don't think I understand what you mean. Surely phones are more mainstream than insulin pumps, no? Or are you saying the phones have to be embedded? I wouldn't make that assumption. An earing and a tie pin could make a nice phone too.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    5. Re:MEMS are much cooler then this by Emugamer · · Score: 1

      Ahh I think of it as embedded which is wrong but the only way that I have dealt with MEMS (rather single minded I am :p)

    6. Re:MEMS are much cooler then this by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      I'm starting a new company with VC money to try to get on the leading edge of the convergence between cell phones and insulin pumps.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  18. Its bad enough ... by SirSlud · · Score: 2



    Is this to facilitate our ever-increasing divorce rates? Now she can call to inform you of the impending alimony payments right from the wedding band!

    Suddenly, the solitary life doesn't seem so bad.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  19. Smaller? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The newest Nokia phones are already way too small...

  20. Of course, not everything can be miniaturized... by valdis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As several people have noted, you still have a problem with battery size. Also, you have a minimum size for the speaker and microphone to produce a usable signal (the only reason in-the-ear headsets can be THAT small is because they ARE in your ear - to be heard from an inch away from your ear they need be bigger).

    And was that guy in the other car flipping you the bird, or just extending his antenna?

  21. Yeah, nevermind the interface... by IIOIOOIOO · · Score: 1

    In theory, they say, you could have a cell phone in a ring on your finger. Before they get things TOO small, they had better make some major improvements in voice interfaces, and figure out how to miniatuarize those components, as well.

  22. Shameless plugs by Doctor+K · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am working in the MEMs area these days. So here are some shameless plugs.

    Here
    is an general interest article from the group in which I work with some details oriented towards these types of mesoscopic MEMs.

    Here
    is a neat picture of a Mesoscopic MEMs device (an acceleratometer resting on top the middle part of the "8" in a 1998 penny.

    And though my research at Berkeley wasn't MEMS oriented, Berkeley MEMS is pretty active. Here is a link to that.

    As the article points out, MEMS are finding applications in cell phones because it is easy to make very small RF filters using inertial effects to provide inductive-like impedences. (In the past, the inductive like parts of a cell-phone filter would either be done with spiral inductors, which are unwieldly or via other microwave circuit voodoo.)

    However, beyond cell phones is a grab bag of MEMs applications already at or beyond the prototype stage:
    - Car air bag detectors (the above accelerometer)
    - Laser gyroscopes
    - Projection displays (pixel mirrors arrays)
    - Optical fiber switches
    - Medical applications (microfluidics, bio-chips, ...)
    - Remote sensing (minaturized microphones, or in the future, smart dust)

    Enjoy
    Kevin

    1. Re:Shameless plugs by DaEvOsH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You must see the picture he links to. AMAZING!!!

  23. Phone cards by ArcticChicken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I imagine someday that, when you buy a phone card, the card itself will double as the phone.

    1. Re:Phone cards by nice · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking more along the lines of disposable phones. Like the cameras, ya know?

    2. Re:Phone cards by hansk · · Score: 1

      It's already heading our way. Check out:

      Disposable cell phone Disposable cell phone

      But, we should always consider the other side of our use and toss society:

      Disposable cell phone and the toxic price

  24. Implants by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Funny
    A while back some of us were sitting round at the IETF discussing the various techno gadgets we had bought recently. Jeff Schiller went first and showed everyone a ham radio the size of a matchbox. Then Steve Bellovin showed people his watch running Linux. All I had was a cheezy Palm VII running a Lisp machine emulator.

    The last guy to go is one of those crypto dudes who wears all black. He holds out his hand and taps his palm a few times. Then after a brief pause he starts speaking to someone as if on the phone, which it turned out he was, this dude had a cell phone implanted into his palm and skull!

    Anyway we continued drinking for some time (it was IETF after all) and the dude asked us to watch his laptop for a while while he went to the little boys room. We had some more drinks and were about to leave when someone pointed out that the dude had not returned yet. So I went off to the bathroom to find him.

    I find the dude bent over the can with his legs stretched out and a bog roll stuck up his ass. Immediately I think the dude has been mugged. "Hey whats up, you OK?" I ask. "No I'm fine", the dude replies "I'm just waiting for a fax".

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  25. Well... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Smaller parts mean smaller battery, for the most part - except when you have to moving parts like MEMS does.

    I doubt that a slower, more expensive and more highly breakable technology is going to be replacing the current one. A general rule of thumb is that no moving parts can be faster/safer/lower power/smaller than moving parts. MEMS has previously been used to replace larger mechanical systems. Its especially good for increasing the resolution of mechanical scans. There was a presentation at my school on the subject - a guy came in with a credit card sized thing and showed that all you do is connect it to a solution and siphon the solution through the card. A MEMS system could then recognize certain chemical agents in the solution (something that is only possible by having a higher resolution scan of the materials).

    But for wireless? At least, it becomes extremely difficult to transmit a signal without a large antennae, and I think mems would require more power than passive systems.

    This is all the truth of the technology as I have read about it in the past. Has anyone seen anything that contradicts my assertions?

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would still need to have the RF power to talk to others.

      Disclaimer: I do not want use my body double as an antenna for RF transmitter.

    2. Re:Well... by markmoss · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are misunderstanding how this works -- it doesn't help that the reporter evidently didn't understand either. The article didn't say this, but it's obvious that the proposed MEM filters are for the receiver circuits, not the transmitter or speaker circuits where power capacity is an issue. (Forget the ring phone, other posters have cited many reasons it's not going to happen.)

      Presently, the most precise analog input filters are electromechanical devices called SAW filters. An array of electrodes apply the input signal to start a piezoelectric crystal vibrating, with another array picking up the output signal. The signal passes through the crystal as a sound wave; the crystal might oscillate at many frequencies, but to pass between crystal and electrodes, the sound wavelength must match the array spacing.

      The proposed "MEMS" filter is a tuning fork etched out of semiconductor, I assume with piezoleletric input and output electrodes. Only signals at very near the natural oscillation frequency of the fork can set it vibrating so as to be picked up at the output electrode. The electrodes can be much smaller, and for cell phone frequencies obviously the fork has to be very tiny. Since the device is smaller, it doesn't use as much power.

      "Slower" -- no. "Uses more power" -- no. "More expensive" -- true for now, but the tinier device will probably be cheaper once it's become a commodity part mass-produced in competing factories. "More breakable" -- yes, but I don't think it will be breakable enough to be a likely point of failure. A really strong shock in the right direction could snap the tuning fork, but considering the tiny size and considerable strength of the likely materials, you'd probably mangle the case, display, and circuit board before you damaged the MEMS.

      A slightly more realistic reliability concern is that for a tuning fork to work, it has to have air space around it. That is, where solid-state components are encased in solid epoxy, a bubble would have to be left around the fork. It's OK if the bubble comes out the intended size and location, and the epoxy covers it completely and makes a good seal around the wires. But if there's the slightest leak to let moisture or anything else get into the bubble, the device will soon die. There are a few larger components which require air bubbles to operate: crystal oscillators usually have a tuning-fork in a bubble, some optocouplers have an air gap separating the LED and phototransistor. No matter how much effort the manufacturer of these devices puts into controlling the build process and testing them 100%, we always have a few go bad when we solder them to the board. They also tend to have high field failure rates, although I don't know if that is due to leakage into the bubble. Crystals are lower frequency and a larger tuning fork, so more breakable, and optocouplers are used mainly to prevent high voltage zaps from getting into the device -- it's no surprise when a device that's _expected_ to be zapped gets zapped too much and fails.

  26. Sooo.. by geekoid · · Score: 2

    .. The wife gets a secret call every time the ring comes off? ;)
    If it takes the form of jewlery, it would be an earing. But mor likely it will be behind the ear, like a hearing aid so you can just talk and hear without holding a darn thing. Of course you can do that now, you just have the phone clipped to your belt.
    Basically the ring analogy was just a long way to go for a bad joke. Not that there is ever a short way to a bad joke...

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Sooo.. by warpSpeed · · Score: 1

      Just think, you combine the cell phone ring with that "mood ring" technology. Then the secret call to your wife would be to inform her that you are horney. Her cell mood ring could call you back and infom you that she has a head ache.

  27. Re:Of course, not everything can be miniaturized.. by kevinadi · · Score: 1

    Agreed. A ring-phone will be too much. I already have problem with newer, smaller nokia phones that got a keypad made for an alien with impossible angle in their fingers. That's not counting the engineering problem of where would you put the keypad? the speaker? the mic? the battery?

    Of course, all can be solved with the mighty bluetooth. But having separate keypad and everything kinda defeats the purpose.

  28. Un-needed size reduction? by kopper187 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even if the implementation takes 3-5 years, further reducing the size of cell phones may only be beneficial in a few markets. Most certainly, the US market will not need super small cell phones in the comming years. The Asian and EU markets already sell phones that on average are significantly smaller than those sold in most of the US market. Yes, those are GSM phones, but if the American consumers wanted smaller phones, the manufacturers would quickly swap out the GSM circuits in put CDMA in place. Unfortunatly (for some of us) the average American still tends to like their products to be larger (at least acording to many market research companies.)

    Where this technology might be more appropriate is in the imbedded markets. For the Auto-makers, the size of On-Star style equipment could be greatly reduced and in-dash cell phones could have a much nicer and simpler integration.

    Though its quite cool to see electornics reaching the miniature level, at some point (which we may have already reached) it will be impracticle to reduce the package size of many consumer electronics. Do you really want a 1 cubic inch sized cell phone that you loose once a week and spend $200 to replace?

    As for MEMS, the medical applications are much more interesting.

    1. Re:Un-needed size reduction? by s!mon · · Score: 1

      Okay, you must be smoking crack on GSM vs CDMA.

      By 2G standards, GSM won in the US (even though its still in development). GSM is easily upgradable to GPRS (2.5G) and then switch out to WCDMA.

      The article is some respects is retarded anyway. Its not the radio circuits that take up all the real estate, its the processors and integrated circuits. Most of the filtering is done by DSP anyway. Oh yeah, and the radio only takes up a fraction of the space anyway.

      Its not rocket science when you consider what they have done to shrink the size of cell phones: put everything in integrated circuits and software. There is a reason why phones are now using zero IF heterodyne receivers (even though they are a forking pain in the ass). Now RF MEMs ACTIVE circuits will make a *huge* difference - but not on circuit real estate - but on actually being able to make a good 3G radio without sacrificing quality.

      And CDMA power control sucks!

    2. Re:Un-needed size reduction? by jvance · · Score: 1

      Do you really want a 1 cubic inch sized cell phone that you loose once a week and spend $200 to replace?

      Yes. I want a 1 cubic inch sized cell phone with a watch strap. Then I won't ever lose it.

      The Motorola T193 (a GSM Voicestream phone) I have is nicely sized - fits in the palm of my hand and pretty unobtrusively in my jacket pocket. It's not ridiculously small like the Nokia 8290. But I know I'm going to leave it somewhere and walk off without it eventually. I've never bought a PDA because I know it would suffer the same fate.

      But put all of that (phone, PDA) in a watch case with decent voice recognition software, and you have a product that I'll sell your soul to buy.

      jvance

    3. Re:Un-needed size reduction? by kopper187 · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trying to say anything related to GSM vs. CDMA. I personally prefer GSM by a long shot. I was simply trying to point out that the only difference between the very small phones found in Asia and the EU, is GSM and that if there was sufficient US market demand, they could be switched to CDMA and made for sale. I'll use Cingular Wireless as the example. In the Bay Area of California, GSM service is available and Cingular uses it. They offer all models of Nokia and Ericcson phones, including their smalest ones (granted, the Bay Area market has many more customers who would be more willing to purchase smaller phones.) Here in Rochester, NY, where there is no GSM service, Cingular only offeres the CDMA Nokias and Ericcsons which are probably the largest models offered by those two manufacturers. From Nokia's standpoint, there is insufficient market demand to offer their smaller GSM phones in CDMA format. This would be true for the majority of the country as only the Pacific coast and perhaps a few other cities have GSM service.

    4. Re:Un-needed size reduction? by LoseNotLooseGuy · · Score: 1

      Do you really want a 1 cubic inch sized cell phone that you loose once a week and spend $200 to replace?

      I doubt that one would be capable of loosing such a cell phone unless, as another poster suggested, it came with some sort of wrist strap. However, it would be very easy to lose such a small phone.

      Congratulations! You have been participant #21 in my campaign to rid Slashdot of this error.

      --
      Proudly correcting Slashdot's most irritating linguistic error since 2002.
    5. Re:Un-needed size reduction? by s!mon · · Score: 1


      Okay, I totally took your comments in the wrong way.

      One of the problems with CDMA phones is the simple fact that its more complicated (frequency hopping plus more complicated linear modulation) compared to GSM's simplicity (time division with GMSK - frequency modulation basically).

      GSM is very simple, extremely well researched, and been in development for a very long time. Ericsson and Nokia are on their 6th or 7th generation of platforms, far ahead of 2nd or 3rd generation CDMA handsets. Thats why the GSM phones are smaller, not because its a market thing. Even the Samsung phones are huge by GSM standards!

    6. Re:Un-needed size reduction? by Jordy · · Score: 2

      I was in Tokyo in August and London in December and I honestly didn't see anything smaller than what I can buy right down the street. I visited a couple cell phone shops here and there, though they all seemed to offer the same phones.

      In Japan, phones tended to be a little bigger than Motorola's flip phones (v.series, startac, etc) (taller more than wide though and less deep) and tended to have more features packed in. They also seemed to make 100 variations of every model for fashion purposes.

      In London, phones were basically identical to what is found in the US with the exception of an Ericsson and a couple Samsungs.

      Of course, in the Bay Area, we have GSM and PCS available which may not be the case in other parts of the country. Maybe in your area they are still selling brick phones, but around here you can pick up a Motorola v.series, Nokia 8800 series, Samsung A series and Ericcson T series (well the T28 World which is the smallest of the series anyway.)

      --
      The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
  29. Universal MIS-Communication by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, so then will giving someone the finger now mean that you want them to call you?

    Imagine conversations with all of those expressive people who are always wave their hands:
    "I WAS wond.....and thEN I THOught..."

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  30. Re:Of course, not everything can be miniaturized.. by geekoid · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    No your honor, I wasn't flashing anybody, I just needed to extend my antenna!
    I imagin cell phone would end up in your ear, until the embed them into peoples teeth, anyway.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  31. I disown slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk to the hand? That is so 90s..

    UCK!

  32. Fapping + Phone? by ratguy · · Score: 1

    This makes me wonder... what happens when the phone rings while masturbation?

    If these things come with a vibration (silent ring) function, I'd be calling myself all day long.

  33. Blurring the line... by Souffle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Great strides were made for crazy people when cell phone users started walking around with headsets appearing to talk to themselves. Now it will be even more difficult to tell the difference between technophiles and crazy people!

    1. Re:Blurring the line... by lizrd · · Score: 2
      Now it will be even more difficult to tell the difference between technophiles and crazy people!

      I don't understand. You speak as though there was some sort of a difference to begin with.

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
  34. Finger phone by sheetsda · · Score: 2

    you could have a cell phone in a ring on your finger...give new meaning to the phrase 'Talk to the hand.'"

    You mean kinda like a miniaturized one of these?

  35. OK this together with the Think & point mouse by Razzious · · Score: 2

    and I can just think my words thus hiding the fact that I am actually talking on the phone.

    Of course I would have to avoid most public places when talking to my girlfriend. I would hate for her to hear WOW WHAT A NICE ASS ON THAT!

    Seriously are we down to this as being "stuff that matters"?

    --
    Razzious Domini
    I could be a GREAT KARMA WHORE if I could just shed the few morals I have left.
  36. Nokia will make lots of money... by msheppard · · Score: 2

    Gives a new meaning to the "custom ring" for your cell phone.

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  37. It could be useful, actually by kevinadi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although a ring-sized phone will be a practical impossibility, it can be used in a more practical way if it is combined with something else.

    The current "best" PDA-phone combination is arguably the Nokia 9210 (or yet-to-be-released 9290 in the US). Although the size is perfectly ok for myself, the weight is not. A ring-sized phone embedded inside a PDA could be the planned direction for this miniaturization.

    Palm is too bulky a unit to be used as a phone, contrary to whatever Handspring say about its Treo. The 9210 is too heavy and too thick for most people. Imagine a phone with Palm functionality, the integration of 9210, and the weight of 80g. This ring-phone technology could be the answer to our prayers.

  38. explain it to the finger by K7001 · · Score: 1

    could be used as a defence in court....
    well it's like this your honour , i was showing him my new phone and he like, took offence , and it all went downhill from then onwards.....

    --
    perl -MIO::Socket -e 'IO::Socket::INET-new(PeerAddr="some.windoze.box:1
  39. Smaller phones won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The reason US phones are larger is because a smaller phone won't work. The lower US population density means a more sparse cellular network, which means a longer (on average) radio link, which requires more RF power. Better frequency filtering can help some, but there is a fundamental limit (described by the Shannon-Hartley theorem) to how low the power can go. The main reason phones have gotten smaller in the last 5 years is because continued build-out has made the networks denser.
    Simply put, a ring-size phone is just plain impossible with anything remotely resembling current physical plant and battery technology.

    1. Re:Smaller phones won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. Give me a 3 watt bag phone and a full tank of gas and I can show anyone just why their toothpick phone really sucks.

      As it is, with my moderately sized handheld phone I tend to get dropouts all over the place.

      Long live full size electronics! At least you have a (small) chance of repairing them...

    2. Re:Smaller phones won't work by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Not true, size of the phones does NOT correlate with population density - not every area on Europe is ultra densely populated.

      If info I found on a quick google search is right, US has average population density of something like 30/km^2 or little less, and for example here in Finland we have average of
      _17_ per square kilometer, yet we have biggest relative cell phone amount in the whole world, and yes, those phones are the miniature european GSM version - and they DO work almost anywhere, the two biggest operators have probably something like 99% coverage, or more.

  40. Cell phone in your ring? by sporty · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who would wanna cell phone in their ring? Keep it in your shoe like any professional spy.

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    1. Re:Cell phone in your ring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who would wanna cell phone in their ring? Keep it in your shoe like any professional spy.

      Or the pen - Open channel D.

  41. It doesnt matter. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Motorola already has a cellphone watch. It's worthless as it's battery life is about 30 seconds. outside of digital land (which makes up 75% of the continental US and 90% of Canada.)

    They can make it the size of an eraser head, If they cant get me a battery for it that lasts as long as a full day of use then it's worthless technology.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:It doesnt matter. by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      They can make it the size of an eraser head, If they cant get me a battery for it that lasts as long as a full day of use then it's worthless technology.

      I'd think a few grains of Plutonium-238(in a companion ring with a hard shield protecting the battery) would be enough fuel for anyone. Unfortunately average humans of today would crack it open and irradiate themselves to death.

      Though there are other fuel sources, which given the unique properties of mems, could simply tap atomic motion itself for power with microspring capacitors if needed. The rythmn of your pulse, plus the motion of your hand, and the difference in temperature of your flesh and the outside air itself combined could be more than enough power to keep a micro-cellphone ring running indefinitely.

      There is a huge arena of ambient energy to be tapped once you can define the microscopic world efficently.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  42. Combadge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean that I will have my Startrek type combadge soon?

  43. Wearable phones by frank249 · · Score: 2

    Why mention a ring phone? I would think that a phone built into a pair of glasses would be more practical. You could even have a projection monitor built in so you could see caller id, menus, browsers/video etc.

    Of course the Trekkies would all buy the 'com badge' version.

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  44. Ear Phone! by Cybersonic · · Score: 1

    I dont know about what you all want, all i want is a cell phone the size of a Jabra ear piece :)

    --
    Cybie! aka Ralph Bonnell
  45. Juat what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More junk cluttering our landfills.

  46. How about a ring watch? by TClevenger · · Score: 1


    Y'know, a gold ring with an embedded digital timepiece, not much bigger than your standard gold band. Even something that displays at the push of a button to conserve battery power. What's the use of having a cellphone the size of a ring when you have to have that 3-ounce watch around your wrist?

  47. Bring the fidoras back! by josquint · · Score: 1

    Or a solar hat! I say that last one because I would love the fidora to come back

    I second that!! I had hoped that RedHat would have done this too, but a red fidora really isn't as cool as a black one :)

  48. Teaser Scene's from "That 2000's Show" by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

    Guy sitting at bar talking into his finger:

    "No it's not a Cell Phone, it's an IN-VIS-A-BLE PHONE!!!"

    ("Only 8 bucks a minute too") :)

  49. So if my ring is set to vibrate.. by Baalam · · Score: 1

    finger user@domain.tld opens a whole new realm of possibilities..

    Oh, come on, use your imagination.

  50. Talk to the hand? Talk to DoCoMo by hndrcks · · Score: 1

    From Oct 2000 Wired:

    "NTT DoCoMo's Media Computing Lab is currently developing a wearable wireless phone that consists only of a wristband. The phone, called the "Whisper," because it vibrates rather than rings, contains a tiny microphone the wearer speaks into.

    The wristband also contains a device that converts voice into vibrations that travel through the hand, the finger and into the ear canal.

    To answer incoming calls, the wearer taps the index finger and thumb -- that's it -- and then sticks a finger in one ear to hear the person on the other line. "

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
  51. Psychological problem with small phones by bjtuna · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's a reason why phones overseas (in Japan and Korea, for example) are so much smaller than they are here. Besides the technology being a small jump ahead over there, Americans seem to have issues with small cell phones-- we think that because they're small, they aren't picking up our voices or that they're toys that somehow don't work as well. And we do this with larger cellphones too (albeit to a lesser degree), probably because we grew up thinking that cellphones were really staticky. Consequently, Americans tend to yell unnecessarily into cell phones, especially small ones. We seem to be uncomfortable accepting the fact that if the microphone part of the handset isn't right next to our mouth, it can still pick up our voice.

    For this reason, phone manufacturers actually increase the size of cell phones for sale in America, or otherwise simply choose not to sell the smaller models here. I predict these types of "ring phones" and what-not will probably have a very hard time gaining a mainstream foothold in North America.

  52. I'm all for smaller phones by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2

    but, they have GOT TO get a better voice activated system for this. I end up sounding like a robot when I try to voice call someone. Fix this, then we can talk about little phones.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  53. putting phones in more useful places.... by scaramush · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...what if the issue isn't making the phones themselves smaller, but adding small bits of telephony to useful places?

    Or, to put it another way, you have a "normal" sized cell phone (whatever we decide that is) that you carry with you, but everywhere you go there's a phone embedded into small spaces places?

    Ooo, even better. What if the receivers are all built on a bluetooth standard. Everyone has a jabra-like ear piece that automatically reaches out and makes a "PAN" connection when it comes in range of a "button" phone. There's a button phone receiver on your monitor, in your car, and in your house, and when you're in any of those spaces, all you have to do is touch your ear piece and speak the number you want to dial. Calls are automatically forwarded to you depending on where the PAN is established. If you go to a store, your earpiece automatically connects to the button phone receiver on the shopping cart, so that if you have questions while you're shopping, you can ask a customer service rep (on their dime)...

    Okay. Back to the crack smoking....

    --
    "...you can steal my woman, but you ain't done nuthin' smart."
  54. finger in the ear phone by limber · · Score: 1

    The American excuses himself, puts his left thumb to his ear and his left pinky finger to his mouth and proceeds to have a phone conversation.

    This technology has already been patented. By the Japanese.

  55. Talk to the hand by StaticLimit · · Score: 2

    And frankly, "Talk to the hand" could use an update... it's getting a little stale. Now all we need a technological advance to give new meaning to "Voted off the island", "You ARE the weakest link", "Is that your final answer?" and "I'd like to phone a friend". Actually I suppose this could have some bearing on the last one...

    - StaticLimit

    1. Re:Talk to the hand by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Someone who went entirely too far with the "weakest link". He told his wife "You are the weakest link - goodbye", then strangled her. And he taped it! That sure made the trial a slam-dunk.

  56. One ring... by InfinityEdge · · Score: 1

    And one ring to call them all.

  57. jewelry phones by mr.ska · · Score: 2
    PERFECT! Now people can get a lip stud and an earring, and it will be their cell phone.

    Of course, then you'll have people forever asking you "Did getting your cell phone hurt?"

    --

    Mr. Ska

  58. Get a clue by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Why don't you read whats actualy going on before jumping to idiotc conclusions.

    For hundreds of thousands of people in the "republic" of Congo, coltan mining is one of the few ways to make ends meet. It's actualy allowing people to eat regularly and keep from starving to death.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  59. Two words... by velcrokitty · · Score: 1

    Phone sex...

    --
    I stick to walls...
  60. You may want to invest in a mic/earpece by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I hardly ever actualy hold my phone up to my ears these days, there's really no reason to anymore. Just get a headset thing.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  61. Nokia 8000x by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I have a Nokia 8260, the thing is tiny, but it's built like a rock. I dropped my original one several feet (out of a dorm loft) at least 10 or 20 times before it finally gave out (from just a 2 foot fall!) But it had been rattling for months before that.

    Anyway, they are quite durable. I'd imagine those flip phones would be quite fragile though.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  62. Lameass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone already told a joke with that punchline earlier in the thread!

  63. Great. by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

    I already have ENOUGH trouble dialing my phone.
    Voice recognition... okay... "Phone, dial 201-555-1212!"... and every phone on the bus starts ringing.

  64. Re:Of course, not everything can be miniaturized.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some guys at my former Uni actually made a MEMS microfown: they measure the rate at wich a small wire cools because of the air that flows over it: they call it a Microflown. It's actually a flow detecter instead of a pressure transducer! They still need some clever electronics though, to compensate for the loss of high frequencies.

  65. Re:Of course, not everything can be miniaturized.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the microphone can be miniaturize onto chip scale. Thank the spy people for that.

  66. More information on MEMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    If you're interested in MEMS technology this site
    has some useful links:

    http://www.memsnet.org/

  67. Confusing nanomechanics "moving parts" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Informative
    Smaller parts mean smaller battery, for the most part - except when you have to moving parts like MEMS does.

    I doubt that a slower, more expensive and more highly breakable technology is going to bereplacing the current one. A general rule of thumb is that no moving parts can be faster/safer/lower power/smaller than moving parts.


    I think you're confused about what the "moving parts" are and what they do. Those rules apply to moving parts that rub against each other. These devices are resonators and diplexers, implemented as parts that vibrate and flex, like a bell ringing or a tuning fork humming.

    Matter flexes all the time, regardless of whether the motion is deliberate or just a response to heat. Unless the flexing is so large that atoms are displaced from their resting place they don't wear out for geological time.

    (Even some displacement is possible without wear. It's called "annealing". Atoms move around slightly to release stresses, resulting in a part the same shape but less brittle.)

    For a resonator: In place of electronic tuned circuits (capacitors and inductors, with the action taking place in the motion of electrons and the electric fields between, and magnetic fields around, large conductive structures) you use nanoscopic tuning forks or other shapes with sudden discontinuities.

    The motion of electrons through long circuits at about 2/3 the speed of light is repaced by the motion of atoms through distances comparable to their own diameter, at speeds more typical of large masses pushed by moderate forces.

    The electric field between two metal plates is miniaturized as the electric fields between pairs of atoms.

    The "inertia" of the magnetic field around a long conductor is replaced by the physical inertia of moving atomic nuclei.

    The operating speed is EXACTLY the same, as is the amount of energy used. (For a given "Q" factor the friction losses are the same, whether a tuned circuit is implemented as an electrical or nanomechanical structure.)

    This kind of thing has been done before - about the time transistor radios became pocket-sized. One example is a miniature quartz crystal about the size of a large ant, precision cut and with precision-deposited electrodes and "doping" weights, replacing (and doing a better job than) about a half-dozen tuned circuits, each pair about the size of a pencil eraser.

    But that was for a frequency under half a megahertz. Now we're talking several factors of ten faster - which translates to several factors of ten smaller. And we're now in the range where we can replace several tuned circuits the size of the chip with several silicon and metal structures each about the size of a large transistor.

    As for "expensive" to construct, we're not talking microscopic robot arms mounting tiny levers and wheels on axles. We're talking etching a shape into silicon, glass, or conductive metal. This can be done using the same processes that put the circuitry and interconnections onto the chip. (It might not even take any extra steps.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  68. In theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In theory, they say, you could have a cell phone in a ring on your finger.

    Why bother with a ring? How about subcutaeneous (sp?), with the mic in my pinky and the speaker in my thumb?
    This would also allow people to pick wax out of their ears and chew thier fingernail on the sly...

  69. Your going to hit a physics wall by jellyking · · Score: 1

    Although I'm not an expert in electronics, I'm an RF/analog engineer and have noticed a few trends. Researchers invent a technology that is great and then someone gets on a bandwagon to have the technology solve many more problems in a shorter amount of time than ever actually happens. MEMs in an outstanding idea, but in order to have a cell phone on a ring, you are forgetting all of the other components. Are these magically going to morph into smaller spaces and perform? Also, talk to a packaging and/or manufacturing engineer and figure out how easy his job is going to be:) You can't just scale down and expect the laws of physics to follow suit. Try to fit a battery on that ring and have it transmit to a base station that's a mile away. If you've got 50% effeciency on the power amp, then your finger is taking 50% of the transmission power as heat. I guess you could have a liquid cooled ring :) I dream that this technology will help us get there, but I wouldn't hold your breath for a ring cellphone. They've already got a cell phone that transmits from a wristwatch, but this device has a huge problem with the battery. Actually, I would like to see what effect the new fuel cell technology with make upon the market. I would encourage any of you who are interested in RF/analog engineering, electronics packaging or electronics manufacturing to consider the huge opportunities that exist for you today. It is a challenging but very rewarding job for those who are interested.

  70. NY Times sells e-mail addresses to spammers by jo42 · · Score: 1
    > The NY Times has a feature

    The last time a NY Times story came up, I put in a bogus name and e-mail address, however the e-mail address was aliased to an existing one. Well, guess what? Earlier today I received spam to this bogus e-mail address using the bogus name. Rancid wankers.