Slashdot Mirror


Concerning The Cancellation of Futurama

Andie Similon of gotfuturama.com writes: "We have recently heard from 4 reliable sources that fox did not pick up the 5th season of futurama. So it's going to get cancelled. We (the fans and webmasters of cgef and other websites) have set up a letter campaign to Fox,' but we need some big sites to spread the word. There are two possibilities of saving futurama A) some other network picking it up B) Fox realizing its mistake (I don't count on it), but the only way we can realise this is that we can get a very big amount of written letters to Fox." Go read the online petition and/or sign it. They've temporarily removed other content on anything else from the site -- there are priorities, after all. Futurama is one of the few shows that make me glad for the invention of television.

179 of 626 comments (clear)

  1. Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by Microsift · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love the Simpsons, but never got into Futurama because there was never enough promotion of the show to make me remember to turn it on. I've seen a couple of episodes of Futurama, but I couldn't tell you what time it's on, or for that matter which day.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by LordNimon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess it's time you bought a TiVo.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I love the Simpsons, but never got into Futurama because there was never enough promotion of the show to make me remember to turn it on.

      I don't watch much TV outside of certain shows I consistently switch on. I was never able to find Futurama after it was initially shuffled away from post-Simpsons Sunday nights, and I saw maybe one promo for the show on Fox after it premiered, ever. Once it moved, I was never able to find it again. Meanwhile, crap like Malcolm in the Middle and Boston Public eats up numerous promo slots. Fox just had no interest in cultivating a post-football, pre-Simpsons audience.

      To some extent, the numerous advertising breaks during football games help push the broadcasts outside of three-hour blocks. It's as boring for people in the arena as it is for viewers at home, and while I'm sure the offense enjoys an extra minute or so to talk strategy, it just messes with the flow of the game. Long post-game wrapups don't help, either; does Fox really need to run ten, fifteen minutes of JB and the boys cracking jokes at each other? Does it boost advertising revenue that much? You'd figure Fox would want to cultivate post-football viewing by preserving the show in the next half-hour slot, instead of running over it all the time. It would especially help those slow periods between football and the next sports season, when a show has to live on its own popularity instead of getting a boost from football.

      But then, I'm not a network executive, nor would I want to be.

      Luckily, Global up here occasionally runs it as filler during dark hours, so I enjoyed a Futurama marathon two nights ago:)

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    3. Re:Probably the most poorly promoted show ever by RoninM · · Score: 2

      Don't be silly -- MST3K was the worst promoted show (that didn't suck). SFC moved it to--what?--6am PST and never ran a commercial for it. Since then they've cancelled it, moved it to 9am PST/EST and extended the contract (for extant episodes) a few times. Futurama received some promotion, although those on the east coast were overrun. The Tick received no promotion. Family Guy received almost no promotion.

      --
      If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  2. ok, let me get this straight... by night_flyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    X-Files - last season
    The Tick - Cancelled
    Futurama - Cancelled
    The Chamber (which they fought so hard to get it out before the chair) - cancelled (thank God)

    just what in the hell are they going to replace these shows with? Its not like a lot of quality material is knocking down the door at FOX

    (that 80's Show?... uggg)

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by erat · · Score: 2

      I think they should convince David Lynch to make Mulholland Drive back into a series and air that. At least there'd be something worth a damn on TV. As it stands, even the worth a damn stuff isn't much worth a damn.

    2. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by crow · · Score: 2

      Dark Angel is still worth watching.

      The Simpsons is heading into, what, season 12? It's not that original anymore, but still funny.

      I'm enjoying 24, but I've heard that Fox was very disappointed with the ratings, so while they'll do 24 episodes, I wouldn't count on that being back next year.

    3. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, I watched about ten minutes of the Chamber, once.

      Somehow, the thought of torture becoming a game show disturbed me. That feeling probably hasn't been helped by the intermittent discussions of how to make torture in the interrogation of suspected terrorists palatable to Americans.

      I'll miss the X-Files, though things kinda started to tank once Duchovny started throwing his weight around - getting the show moved from nice digs in Vancouver, then leaving, then not, then leaving, then not, forcing Carter and the writers to dance around this... just a mess. A part of me wishes Mulder had just been McLeaned at the end of the seventh season, instead of letting him play these games and drag the death out so much longer.

      Never watched The Tick. Live-action versions of animated shows just don't resonate with me for some reason. Probably something about the inherent absurdity of cartoons, combined with the ability to depict events and places far cheaper than showing the same things in live-action.

      That 80's Show should make like the decade and be over. I'd like to forget the greed-is-good, disco-hangover 1980's, thanks. If anyone tells you the 1970's lived off pretension, please see "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" and glam rock, then slap the person who tells you that.

      --

      Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    4. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by EvlPenguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FOX is nothing but a myriad of sleazy network executives. There were three things that kept me watching that channel after the X-Files started sucking (like, 4 seasons ago): Family Guy (now canceled!!!), Futurama (alas...) and The Simpsons. Now it's down to just the Simpsons.

      I'm not one to flame, but the people at FOX are smoking something with strong hallucinagenic qualities. What the hell are they going to replace it with? Another "extreme" game show?!??! Another Survivor rip-off?! Maybe they'll show re-runs of Boston Public! Ooooh!

      Regarding Family Guy -- what was perhaps the best [funniest] show on televesion -- there's a petition and information on a letter writing campaign over at Planet Family Guy. What a morbid world we live in.

      --

      --
      #nohup cat /dev/dsp > /dev/hda & killall -9 getty
    5. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Gulthek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Malcom in the Middle is pretty hilarious, but one show isn't enough to run a network on...just look at UPN.

    6. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by amuro98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tivo accidentally recorded "The Chamber" instead of Futurama once (stupid Fox switched their schedule at the last moment.)

      I was eerily reminded of the gameshows like those in 'The Running Man.'

      The Tick was actually pretty good. A bit different from the comic and animated series, but still quite funny.

      Between The Tick and Futurama, FOX is sending a clear signal that they don't want me watching their station anymore.

    7. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by ahde · · Score: 2

      I think you mean Mutant X... Isn't special unit 2 the one with then gnome?

    8. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      X files has been crap cince Season 4.
      they started to seperate from the actual premise the show was based on and started to wander into a freakshow.

      Sorry, but a 4 armed freak with 2 sets of teeth is the result of inbreeding not aliens... I got sick of the ghost crap, and the other "phenomona" that they decided to switch to.

      Basically , after the Movie and the first 10 episodes after that, the show tanked and became crap... and stayed there.

      Futurama was placed at a death slot (7:00pm sunday's.. what nimrod thought that was a good one?) and most everyone I know would say, "Damn, I keep forgetting that it's on then, I start watching at 8pm"

      FOX never wanted futurama to exist. and their handling of the show is proof.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by dimator · · Score: 2

      Shit, I didn't know Family Guy was cancelled... that sucks a nut. There is officially nothing on TV that interests me now.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    10. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      So, pull the plug on cable and tell your cable provider why.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    11. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by Your+Login+Here · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't worry about family guy. It gets cancelled every year, but then they promise to behave and not get in trouble with the censors. So fox orders more episodes. Naturally the FG team ignores their earlier promises and does what they want. So fox cancels them.

      The bottom line is that they are still airing new episodes, and most of my friends watch it. At least they do when we can find them.

      Futurama OTOH has trouble reaching people who don't get all the sci-fi references. And some of the episodes suffer from too many jokes about the sixties (Nixon isn't that funny to people under 30). But I can always forgive a show that gave us the line "Woah, I think that hippie's kicking in".

    12. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by crotherm · · Score: 2
      I'm not one to flame, but the people at FOX are smoking something with strong hallucinagenic qualities.

      Ahh were that it were true. I mean what better way to enjoy Futurama, The Tick, Family Guy, etc. then smoking some fine hallucinagenics and a bag of cookies.

      Hmmmmmmmm Coookies.

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    13. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by dimator · · Score: 2

      Are you crazy? I used to envy people with HBO, what with all the cool movies, but now that I have it (for free, holster your flamethrower), I realize that it is roughly 96% garbage. The same movie 20 times a week, and the rest of the time, shitty shows like Arliss or Sex and the Whatever, not to mention the endless river of B movies no one has ever heard of.

      The other 4%? Cool shows like the Sopranos, and Band of Brothers. (And of course, Britney concerts in mute. :) )

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    14. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      I'm glad it got cancelled. The liberal use of epilepsy inducing strobe-lights was ignorant at best, and criminal at worst.

      My wife couldn't even watch the show without getting a headache. We liked the general idea (except for the fact that if THEY decided you couldn't take any more they'd pull you, no matter how much you protested), but the strobes made the show literally unwatchable.

    15. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by squaretorus · · Score: 2

      As our friend above reminds us with his Simpsons Quote there are two things that sell - sports and tits.
      Cartoons just dont have enough tits in 'em. Even SouthPark never has real tits in it. Now if Futurama had a mix of animation and gratuitous live action titty girls it would run forever.

      Just bolt 'Warning - this program is rated R - because of all the tits' on the front of any show to increase ratings 100% - they'd never over run football into that!

    16. Re:ok, let me get this straight... by derrickh · · Score: 2

      CBS cancelled Brimstone. But yeah, Fox still sucks.

      D

  3. Best of luck to you... by Teancom · · Score: 5, Informative

    But like the "Tick" guy said in his interview, the whole letter-writing campaign thing has been played to death. Especially when a show has been on the air for four years, you can't exactly expect the network to "just give it a chance to build an audience". If they haven't got their audience already, I'm afraid a couple hundred people writing and saying "but, but, it's cool!" isn't going to change their mind.

    *shrug* Sorry, but that's the way it is...

    1. Re:Best of luck to you... by VP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just signed - from the time I entered the site until I confirmed my signature roughly 100 more people managed to sign the petition (nice Slahdot effect in action :-). Your estimate of a couple of hundred people is already off by an order of magnitude.

    2. Re:Best of luck to you... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      Personally, I would rather things end in their prime than survive as animated corpses. The X-Files has outlived its usefulness. The whole Star Trek franchise is overdue for euthanasia. The Simpsons, oddly enough, still seems to have some legs, but I don't know for how much longer.

      My attitude to these things is "let it go." The talent associated with the old series will find a new place to go, and often revitalize itself there. Writing and production teams get stale and insular if they don't go out and mix it up after a while.

    3. Re:Best of luck to you... by jd142 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It needs a decent time slot to get an audience. If they'd actually show the darn thing, people would watch it. Half the time it's pre-empted for either football or baseball. My suggestion is that fox never even try to have an original program at 6:00 central on a Sunday night. Just show a re-run on those few nights when there isn't some stupid sporting event.

    4. Re:Best of luck to you... by Teancom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      [This is in reply to both you and the AC]

      Electronic signatures mean jack-diddley. *Nobody* bases decisions on how stuffed an online petition is. The only way of getting their attention at *all* is physically writing a letter, licking a stamp, and sending it to the appropriate P.O. box, Hollywood, CA. Which brings me back to my original point, that the write-in campaign has been done to death. Psuedo-quoting the Tick guy, the studios realize that *every* fantasy/sci-fi show out there has it's fans, and you can be garunteed that they know with a reasonable accuracy how many of those people there are. So a letter from you saying that you like the show just isn't all that impressive. For whatever reason (crappy timeslot, lack of advertising, etc) the show isn't bringing enough eyeballs to the set, and it will be dropped, from *Fox*. IMNSHO, a *much* better campaign would be to pick a network (scifi, comedy-central, whatever) and target *them* with a letter writing campaign, urging them to pick up the show, and treat it right. I just have an incredibly hard time imagining Fox saying "Well, we *did* decide after four years this show just isn't working for us anymore, but now that we recieved a few hundred letters, we'll change our mind!" And, again, I stick by my "few hundred letters" theory. Personal experience tells me that one out of twenty people who sign the electronic petition will also write a letter (actually, that's being very generous, but oh well).

    5. Re:Best of luck to you... by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      I had a look at some of the other petitions on that site. Save Family Guy seems to have about 10 times as many signatures as save Futurama. Any indication it's working for them?

      My personal favourite is this one.

    6. Re:Best of luck to you... by fleener · · Score: 2

      Running a show for 4 years with virtually no promotion (oh yeah, like anyone can remember the last Futurama commercial they saw!) and pre-empting it for sports events on a whim... well, it's amazing Futurama has such a faithful audience to begin with. Fox has put roadblock and roadblock in front of Futurama and I somehow still managed to catch it every Sunday (at least the Sundays when Fox actually aired it).

      The Comedy Channel or SciFi Channel better pick this puppy up.

    7. Re:Best of luck to you... by harvardian · · Score: 2
      I agree, and I am not impressed with the high rate of signing of this petition.

      FOX cancelled Futurama knowing that it was getting 7 million viewers just a few months ago (according to Nielson, google cache here). If 1 million dedicated viewers sign this petition, I don't see why FOX should care. Just because 1 million of those 7 million viewers are dedicated enough to sign a petition about the show doesn't mean anything -- dedicated viewers don't make FOX any more money than mildly interested viewers.

    8. Re:Best of luck to you... by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Trust me, electronic petitions mean nothing. I have had opprotunity to work with a couple of large institutions that have had web based petitions submitted to them for one thing or another (political). They aren't even looked at. It's too easy and the chance of fraud is huge. Even if they try to do email validation, etc., you just can't trust them. It's one man one vote, not one email address one vote.

      If you only care enough to fill in a couple of form fields and hit submit instead of taking the time to send an actual letter, you must not care very much at all.

      .

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    9. Re:Best of luck to you... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      because for every petionar there are at least 10 other viewers.
      I, of course, mean actual viewer as opposed to Nelson Viewers.

      The same goes with compaint letters.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:Best of luck to you... by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder what kind of commercials appeal to somebody with enough time to sit with a stopwatch and refresh a page every 30 seconds and figure out what the rate of change on it is?

    11. Re:Best of luck to you... by ahde · · Score: 2

      um... that was me. libwww, don't you know?

    12. Re:Best of luck to you... by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      But like the "Tick" guy said in his interview, the whole letter-writing campaign thing has been played to death.

      Funny, I though the whole "letter writing" thing was based on the known statistical bias built into the Neilsen system. Single 18-30 year olds don't have Neilsen boxes. Families of four do. So if you can prove that a valuable (to advertisers) demographic is actually watching the show, you might convince the network to keep it on the air. The point is to prove that an audience is there, but that they aren't reflected in the Neilsens. If we give those Fox execs something to show potential advertisers other than mediocre Neilsens, they might just be able to make some money by keeping the show on the air. Fox execs may be complete morons otherwise, but I'm willing to bet they know something about selling advertising.

    13. Re:Best of luck to you... by cybermage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My suggestion is that fox never even try to have an original program at 6:00 central on a Sunday night.

      Agreed.

      I think they'd do better to have Futurama share a time slot with Family Guy. The two shows combined could fill a whole season with programming where neither manages, or is allowed to, now.

      They could go one better and commit one whole hour a week for short seasons of niche shows. One week, show Family Guy and The Tick; Next week, show Futurama and _________. Next week back to Family Guy. Etc.

      Just put the hour somewhere in the schedule that isn't prone to being pre-empted. The current Thursday 8pm slot seems appropriate since their only chance is to couter-program the NBC sitcoms.

    14. Re:Best of luck to you... by istartedi · · Score: 2

      This is the whole problem with ALL network TV, not just Fox. STOP SHOWING SPORTS ON NETWORK TV. There. Said it. Showing sports on network is a hold-over from the days when there were only 3 channels. Nowadays most people have cable, and the people that really like sports and don't have cable have satellite. I can understand showing sports when it can be scheduled properly, such as football games shown between 12 and 4PM when there is nothing on anyway. But sports should not pre-empt regular network programming as if it were some kind of disaster like the coronation of "dictator of the United States" during a tornado while the city burns down after an earthquake.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    15. Re:Best of luck to you... by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know this is also a far fetched idea, but, how about if they *advertise* it??? I mean, I saw so many ads for that 80's show during the superbowl that it made me sick, and those were the 3rd generation ads for that show. Fox refuses to advertise The Family Guy, and they wonder why no one watches it.

      --
      sig?
    16. Re:Best of luck to you... by Teancom · · Score: 2

      Unfortunetly, I don't know you, so I don't know your background. You might very well be a long-time player in the television industry, with years of experience on how all this works. Well, I'm not and I don't. All I have to base my opinions on is a few interviews (with people like the Tick guy) and previous petitions set up for other, similar shows (Family Guy, The Tick, B5: Crusades, etc). And from every one of those sources, the message is: petitions don't matter. As another poster in this thread pointed out, the Family Guy petition has approx. 10x the number of "signatures" this one does, and I haven't heard even a whisper of "well, we're thinking about it". And finally, if you read my original post, you'll notice that I /implicitly/ acknowledge that the "letter writing" thing *used* to be effective: until it was overplayed. When you get a couple hundred letters *every* time you cancel a scifi/fantasy/geeky show, the ability to sway execs minds diminished. Advertisers will only accept "our neilsens suck but checkout our mailbox!" so many times before they start to yawm and look for other networks.

      Now, having said all that, (and with such style!) if you *do* have an "in" on how these things work, and I *am* flat-out wrong, please reply! This sort of things interests me, esp. the whole "behind-the-scenes" angle.

      P.S. I've always meant to checkout Futurama, but never got around to it, and if it's on the air longer, I would have that chance. But if not, you won't catch me writing a letter to my congressman B-)

    17. Re:Best of luck to you... by M-G · · Score: 2

      And let's see...is "24" going to continue after the day is up? And they already show it twice a week anyway.

      And what about Dark Angel? The only thing it has going for it is Jessica Alba.

      Greg the Bunny looks like it may have some promise, but Andy Richter? Jeez...

  4. Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by rizzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I loved the Simpsons in it's "prime" (circa seasons 2 through 7), but lately it has become tired and predictable. Futurama is laugh-out-loud funny and clever and ways that the Simpsons once promised but have stopped even trying to achieve.

    If you need to kill something Rupert, put the Simpsons to bed and move Futurama to the 8E/7C time slot. Having it at 7E/6C time slot is worthless considering FOX is a football network and football games never finish before then. I can't recall seeing a single episode that I actually sat at the TV waiting for.

    --

    "More organs means more human." - Zim

    1. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Da+Masta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed. After the "Who Shot Mr.Burns?" season, the Simpsons really began to suck, especially compared to other cartoons that began to show up, King of the Hill, Family Guy, Futurama, etc. It's time for FOX to kill the Simpsons, bring back Futurama and/or Family Guy, and make Malcolm in the Middle funny again.

    2. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      Yeah, Simpsons is a weird mixture of still some funny stuff, and then lots of very lame-o Disneysque "moral of the story" kid stuff. It's weird combination; if you want to do "moral" things, do your Mary Poppins; if rough and funny, do South Park. But do NOT try to mix the two. Simpsons is doing that, at least with new episodes (yeah yeah, not rough and funny just mildly amusing and just teeny-weeny bit naughty occasionally but still). :-/

      Of course it could be just matter of taste; those few X-files episodes I ever saw convinced me it's half-assed low-quality sci-fi-wannabe stuff more often found from paperback books (and "philosophic" semi-intellectual conversations comical)... but lots of people just love(d) the series.

      But anyways, Futurama is my favourite from Fox and a real pity if/when it goes away. They should rather axe Simpsons... before it gets even worse. :-)

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    3. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by bugg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Everyone always says crap like this, but if you'll excuse me, I disagree.

      I've found the Simpsons to be consistently amusing since day one. Yes, they've had some episodes that aren't perfect, but overall the recent seasons have been great.

      The brand of humor is changing. Perhaps you people can't handle that. But recent episodes such as HOMR (crayon in the brain) and Trilogy of Error (The thumb / Linguo / Smuggled firecrackers) have been terribly enjoyable.

      Buzz off, Simpsons are still great, and for as long as they can maintain this quality I've got no complaints. I don't want to seem them stick around past their prime, but we've still got a few years until we need to worry about that, IMHO.

      One more thing- another response to your comment mentioned disney-esque morals in recent episodes? Huh? Are we watching the same show?

      --
      -bugg
    4. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by elefantstn · · Score: 2

      Sure, there are still good eps, but there are some truly atrocious ones as well. Beyond Blunderdome (with Mel Gibson)? What the hell was the point of that? The one about the body in the quarry this year? Totally pointless.

      You're right about the morals thing, though. I don't know what that poster was talking about. If anything, the middle seasons contained the largest amount of moralizing, whereas now the show is almost nihilistic. Not that the moralizing was ever overbearing, IMO, but to say that it's moreso now is a real strech.

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    5. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Joe+Rumsey · · Score: 2

      Got to agree with you. There are many things from every single season of the Simpsons that will make me laugh out loud every time I see them (or just think of them... I wish Pinchy were here to enjoy this!) I do think it's past its prime, but I also think it's still way better than every other show's "prime". It's all relative, and The Simpsons is still my favorite show.

      On the other hand, I can't remember a single thing from Futurama that made me laugh out loud. I don't mean I've never laughed at it, just that I don't remember anything that funny now. I stopped watching regularly (but not entirely) a while back, which is why I'm not terribly disappointed it's going away. I mean, I'm disappointed in the sense that I'd cancel everything else on Fox's schedule before The Simpsons and Futurama (not that I can name much of anything else on their schedule - that's the point) but still not really upset.

    6. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Simpsons are still great, and for as long as they can maintain this quality I've got no complaints. I don't want to seem them stick around past their prime, but we've still got a few years until we need to worry about that, IMHO.

      The Simpsons has changed ever so gradually over the years. They started with great characters that everyone could relate to. Then as they ran out of jokes that every family with 2.3 children could appreciate, they started to get just plain bizarre. Sturgeons falling from the sky, homer's chest being ripped open by a dog, etc. There's a lot of these useless gags creeping into the recent episodes, and I never thought I'd say this, but I'm actually getting tired of the Simpson's now.

      Futurama is what Groenings first animated sitcom would have been, had he not (presumably) been forced to give Fox something that wasn't so far out to begin with (See his Life In Hell books). The stories are damn funny, and the characters are ingenious (Zoidberg kicks ass). But what's different wrt the Simpsons is that this time there are no rules. You just couldn't have an egg sandwich causing a symbiotic worm colony in Homer's stomach, but it works great in Futurama. When you can pull off stories like that, you don't have to worry about ever running out of ideas.

      Anyway, no amount of petitioning Fox will increase the audience for this brilliant show. If you want Futurama to live, you need to get people WATCHING it.

    7. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Joe+Rumsey · · Score: 2

      Nope, not kidding, and I've seen that episode. It is one of the better ones. But still not great. Here's some related Simpsons jokes for you. (and I do mean you, no one else is going to read a reply on a story more than a whole day old on slashdot!)

      Bart is on a school tour of the police station, and spots a wall full of megaphones. After pondering for a few moments, he has an idea. Cut to shot of 30 megaphones placed end-to-end, with Bart at the speaking end. A fly buzzes by, and the room starts shaking. Bart starts to say "Testing..." but only gets as far as "Tes..." before a shockwave spreads all over Springfield. The ringing doesn't stop until after Wiggum takes Bart home (and in the middle of one of Marge's lines).

      Homer is on board the space shuttle, and accidentally breaks open the ant farm. Back on earth, Kent Brockman sees an ant float close to the camera, and assumes that it's a race of giant ants coming from space to enslave us all. "Let me be the first to say, 'Welcome!' to our new ant masters!"

    8. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      For me what is wrong is that it doesn't work (btw, "wrong" as in "doesn't work", not as in morally wrong or such). Result is not funny; stuff that would either be funny (to me), or touching/realistic/whatever (for someone else... the "moral of the story" part) cancels out the other part. Like mixing oil and water (can be done like in mayo... but isn't easy).

      I find some satiric humour in Simpsons to be funny, but I find "we are good normal people after all" part to be cheesy. Just like happy endings ruin some movies; for movies were they fit nicely in they are ok; for movies that require different kind of ending they just spoil the whole thing.

      I just want my satiric humour pure; not necessarily/always sardonically sharp, but certainly not as watered-down "hey-we-didnt-really-mean-to-mock-em" version either.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    9. Re:Do you want to the Simpsons, but save Futurama by Doomdark · · Score: 2
      Hard to argue with the author of the series about how things should be done eh? I kind of thought this was due to networks push for conforming nice family-valued entertainment... but if that's not the case I'm actually happy, even if I don't like the product as much as I would if it was produced differently. His show, them's the rules.

      Of course this probably explains a bit about Futurama having somewhat different direction... I find it more consistent (plus funny) because of its missing "realistic characters" department. :-)
      What Simpsons has going for it (more than Futurama) are the long-running character development sideline plots, and these are actually based on character traits... and often funny (gay theme for mr. Byrns 'n Smithers, relationship between the principal etc. etc), because they aren't pushed to the foreground too heavily. Just like all 'secondary jokes' in ZAZ movies (Naked Gun etc); things that shown alone wouldn't be all that funny, but combined add to the 'main course' nicely.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
  5. Futurama Cancellation by theRhinoceros · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A real shame that the Simpsons continues to be milked long past it's prime (let's not kid ourselves; Simpsons has been in a steady decline for some time now) while Futurama gets neglected despite a noticable superiority in both animation quality and humor (the recent Anthology ep, for example).

    1. Re:Futurama Cancellation by mgblst · · Score: 2

      god... if animation quality counted, all we would see would be southpark!

  6. Sunday Afternoon Football by Cheesemaker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Futurama might have gotten more of a chance to build a fan base if it weren't always pre-empted by FOX NFL games.

    1. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      It's not just that. Even when it gets a chance to show, it's still in a lousy slot. If they put it just after Simpsons, they'd have the ratings that they want. The way they have it set up, the show can't help but fail.

    2. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by realdpk · · Score: 2

      What are these "slots" you speak of?

      I wonder if TiVo has any stats they could send Fox that might help show how many people actually watch it even with the crazy scheduling issues.

    3. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2

      Typically what you do to buoy up a show that you want to give a chance, is place it AFTER an already popular show. If you do this, people have momentum going into the new show. So, the ideal place for new shows on Fox is after the Simpsons, because people will decide to just leave the channel where it is. It's hard to get people to come and watch a show BEFORE a popular show, since very often, the popular show is the first thing that they're watching on that channel that night. You have to really convince them that changing is worth it. This is probably why 'The Family Guy' didn't do very well, as well.

    4. Re:Sunday Afternoon Football by curunir · · Score: 2

      Perfect way to convince the FOX execs...

      TiVo: look how many of our users watch futurama!
      FOX: how many of them watch the commercials?
      TiVo: ...

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
  7. Spell check... by Rothfuss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not to be a picky little bitch, but if you are going to submit a petition to a major network begging them not to kill your favorite TV show, and then ask thousands of others to sign along with you, take a minute to run it through your spell checker.

    -Rothfuss

    1. Re:Spell check... by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      They want to show that they're average people. Average people cannot speel.

      --
      Rod Taylor
  8. Re:Ah CR@P! by RiotXIX · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well. I guess we can't get rid of all people who make uninformed judgements.

    --
    "You know you don't act like a scientist, you're more like a game show host." Dana Barret
  9. Maybe it's for the best. by bartyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many good shows have been cancelled before. And maybe it's better that way. Once they reach their peak, they start to degenerate rather fast - just look at the Simpsons, which should have been dropped after season 7.

    Many other excellent shows have been cancelled before hitting their prime, (My So-called Life and Freaks And Geeks come to mind), but this isn't the case here - Futurama is terrific, and I don't think it can get any better, only worst.

  10. NFL vs Futurama by Link310 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've always enjoyed Futurama, that is when I got a chance to watch it. Unfortunatly, on the East Coast, if Fox is showing any NFL game, it will inevitably run over the time slot for Futurama. This happened even with the SEASON PREMIER. So, as far as I'm concerned, I didn't watch it because they didn't air it. I seem to recall the same thing happening at back home in Miami with a Time Cop show. I never got to see it because the local ABC affiliate decided they should talk about monday night football instead.

  11. Slashdot live! by hyrdra · · Score: 2

    Pretty cool thing...you can see the Slashdot effect in real time. Hit reload and the signature #'s on the page increase by about 2-3 a second.

    --


    "I'll just chip in a bit for RedHat: I actually have that installed on my university machine." - Linus, '95
  12. Experiment by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps FOX should switch the timeslots of Futurama and Malcolm in the Middle for, say, a month.

    FOX seems to have a history of trying to prop up weaker timeslots by relegating popular shows to crap times when no one is watching (or when everyone is watching other channels). Even the Simpsons got this treatment for a season or so, back when FOX didn't have as much strong programming to fall back on. The lack of good content to replace it on Sunday night at that time may be what saved the show from being cancelled; FOX just moved it back to the original 8 pm timeslot.

    If all else fails, perhaps the creators could see about getting the Comedy Channel or the Cartoon Network to fund and pick it up, something not unheard of for cult hits that get chopped by their original network.

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:Experiment by zerocool^ · · Score: 2


      Perhaps FOX should switch the timeslots of Futurama and Malcolm in the Middle for, say, a month.

      I don't really mind Malcom. What I could really do without is the freaking King of the Hill. And don't flame me, I'm a southern boy (born and raised in Tennessee) - my dad *is* Hank Hill. I thought it was the greatest show ever the frist, say, 6 episodes, but lately it's painful to watch.

      Move Family Guy and Futurama to Sunday nite, and watch your ratings SOAR. Show FG eps after simpsons on weekdays (there's enough of them for a month or 2), and see how many people watch.

      ~!

      --
      sig?
    2. Re:Experiment by 4mn0t1337 · · Score: 2
      Wow! Talk about missing the point. Have you ever even been to Texas or meet the same style of chock-full-o'pride Texans as Hank Hill?

      IT WAS A JOKE!!! Like so many of the other jokes, it is a commentary on the character of this kind of Texan. They take pride in sharing the same citizenship (in Texas it is more than a residency -- they are Texans first, and "American" is a subset of the category "texan") with other figures.

      What is the name of Bobby's school?

      Why do people look down on Peggy?

      Why were the guys making fun of Hank and putting I(heart)NY stickers on his car?)

      For some reason you think the show is pushing some political agenda???

      Quick: What other Texan is hank's dog named for? What was the party affiliation?

      Quick: What ex-Governer showed up on the show? What party??

      Still think there are political motivations?

      IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PERSON, OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT THEY ARE TEXAN.

      But you seem to be so blinded by your own agenda that you can't perceive anything but own narrow world view.

      NOTE: I am not indicating one way or another anything about the character of GWB. To understand it was a joke is independent.
      NOTE2: Nor am I saying the show is or is not funny. To each their own. But, I, for one am not so wound up in my own world that I can see it as an attempt a humor.
      NOTE3: Yeah, yeah, yeah: IHBT. TFP. HAND....

      --

      ______
      Once: you're a philosopher. Twice: a pervert.

  13. I blame sports by EddydaSquige · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If Fox didn't prempt it every other week for some game or another maybe it could get itto a groove that would make people watch all the time. How can you expect to develop a following if you only air the show once every other month. Constantly prempting a show is as bad as changeing its time slot 6 times over the season, and then blame a lack of rateings for the cancelation.

  14. my fox affiliate by hyperstation · · Score: 2, Interesting

    doesn't carry Futurama unfortunately (i have no idea why, the simpsons and m in the middle are on every sunday)....so i've been missing out anyhow

  15. Almost as Important... by Murdock037 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...Does anybody know how this would affect the planned upcoming DVD sets?

    Fox did pretty well for themselves by the Season 1 DVDs of "The Simpsons," and I remember rumblings that "Futurama" would follow not too far behind.

    It'd be a shame if these disappear, too; the commentaries on the Simpsons discs were as amusing as the shows themselves, and the Futurama crew has always struck me as being a bit sharper in their wit.

    At least Fox is still putting out quality programming like "That 80s Show" and "Temptation Island 2," right? I mean, right? Who's with me?

    1. Re:Almost as Important... by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

      The DVD is available at amazon.co.uk:

      Futurama Season 1 DVD

    2. Re:Almost as Important... by Glytch · · Score: 2

      It's times like this that I'm glad I got one of the original Pioneer regionless dvdroms when I had the chance.

      But now I'm torn. Do I buy the DVDs and thus give FOX my money, or do I give FOX a big "Fuck You!" and deprive myself of Futurama goodness?

  16. Petition UPN! by malibucreek · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Don't just petition Fox. If they've made up their mind, they've made it up. Even if they decide to consider the show as a midseason replacement, the production company will likely let people go before that call ever comes.

    Instead, petition UPN to pick it up. They have a history of picking up other networks' shows (Buffy, Roswell, etc.) and this one would fit in well with its lineup.

    The address:
    UPN Entertainment
    11800 Wilshire Blvd.
    Los Angeles, CA 90025

    IMHO, this is the show's best hope.

    --

    Why is it called COMMON sense when so few people have it?

    1. Re:Petition UPN! by donglekey · · Score: 2

      When Family Guy was going to be cancelled the first time there was a huge push from fans that got it to stay. Now Family Guy is on the brink again and there is another gathering of fans. Sign the Petition! And picket if you are in the area.

  17. too bad by Deanasc · · Score: 2
    Fox never gave this show a chance. Never in prime time and always pre-empted to finish a Nascar Race or Football game that ran over their slot. It's too bad. I really like this show.

    I won't lift a finger to help save it though. I leanred my lesson trying to save Mystery Science Theator 3000.

    You can't fight the man.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  18. Re:What about Family Guy? by CurlyG · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well gee yeah that's incredible... people protest the closing of shows they like while ignoring the passing of shows that they don't like! What bias! How unfair! Boo hoo!

    ...and "The Family Guy"...? Just when exactly did you have your sense of humour surgically removed? Were the "All in the Family" reruns too heart-stoppingly chucklesome for you?

    --
    You know they call 'em fingers but I've never seen 'em fing. Oh, there they go.
  19. Cool Note by Kallahar · · Score: 2

    As of now the number of signers on the petition is rising at about 100 sigs a minute.

    Cool :)

  20. Quality, not quantity. by spt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So there's 4 seasons. Isn't that enough?

    Some of the best things come in small doses - take Fawlty Towers, for example, one of the funniest sitcoms ever, and they only made 12.
    John Cleese said he put everything it needed in those 12 episodes.

    If you can live with 'only' 4 seasons of Futurama, perhaps the writers will come up with something better.

  21. Proofread and edit by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Please, have somebody go through and fix all the spelling errors, and generally edit the petition. It looks sort of sloppy.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  22. If you like the show so much ... by SuperRob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WATCH the damned thing. Shows, even shitty ones, don't get cancelled if people WATCH them. If the show gets cancelled, it's because you aren't putting your viewing habits where your mouth is!

    I am as big a "fan" of Futurama and Family Guy as the next person. But when push comes to shove, there's other things on TV I'd rather watch more.

    That's why they've been cancelled. Fox needs shows that people will watch, and that means being BETTER than the stuff on the other two (three, counting CBS) networks.

    1. Re:If you like the show so much ... by kopper187 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WATCH the damned thing. Shows, even shitty ones, don't get cancelled if people WATCH them. If the show gets cancelled, it's because you aren't putting your viewing habits where your mouth is!

      What good would it do if I watched the show? I don't have a Nelson box on my TV so how would FOX know if I'm watching it? (Which I do)

      The better solution, as others have pointed out, is if FOX had slotted Futurama after Simpsons or some other popular show (do they have any others?)

    2. Re:If you like the show so much ... by Hal-9001 · · Score: 2

      And watching the show without some mechanism for the network (in this case Fox) to know that you're watching helps how?

      IIRC, ratings are based on feedback (collected by a device that figures out what channel you're watching) from a "random" sampling of television viewers. I say "random" because apparently these people watch shows like Millionaire and Survivor and Temptation Island that I just can't stand.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    3. Re:If you like the show so much ... by SuperRob · · Score: 2

      Football is only on for a couple of months. Futurama's ratings have been shitty for FOUR SEASONS.

      Someone give me a better argument for why this show should stay on the air and continue costing Fox money. They put the show on after the Simpsons, no one watched. They put it on after football, no one watched. They put it back to back with Family Guy (another critically acclaimed, and seldom watched show), and NO ONE WATCHED.

      They've put this show in every time slot imaginable waiting for that vocal viewership to tune in, and it just didn't happen.

      I like the show, but not enough to watch it. Apparently, just like everyone else.

      As for the Neilsen ratings, that's bullshit. The Simpsons gets great ratings, and the viewership should be the same. The people watching the Simpsons just aren't watching Futurama or Family Guy. Blame THEM, not FOX.

    4. Re:If you like the show so much ... by mgblst · · Score: 2

      ohh... the power those people with the boxes must feel.

  23. Don't sign if you don't watch by skoda · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how many people are signing the petition to save Futurama, who don't watch the show.

    Consider, best case scenario:
    - 80 gazillion people sign the petition.
    - FOX says, "Great Googly-moogly! We didn't know we had all these viewers. Keep Futurama on the air!"
    - Futurama stays on the air
    - After a year, ratings, surveys, etc. reveal that, as FOX originally thought, only 80 people actually watch Futurama.
    - FOX yanks Futurama.
    - FOX never listens to a petition again.

    If you are signing the petition, but have not and will not watch the show, you're really not helping.

    1. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by gargle · · Score: 2

      I don't see why people think that writing a petition will help - unless Fox is really stupid, they must already have a good idea of how many people watch Futurama. How will a petition change anything?

    2. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "If you are signing the petition, but have not and will not watch the show, you're really not helping."

      You're forgetting something: The only time it actually helps to watch the show is if you have a Nielson box on your set. If you don't show up on the Nielson ratings, your opinion means squat.

    3. Re:Don't sign if you don't watch by shogun · · Score: 2

      Or how many of us have never watched Futurama or Family Guy on TV and only ever seen it from copies downloaded from somewhere?...

  24. great idea! by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    great idea!! lets slashdot the petition!

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  25. That's ok by Enry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even when they do tell you it's on, you'll wind up watching about 20 minutes of post-game football followed by 10 minutes of Futurama "already in progress".

    They probably want the space for "that 90s show".

    1. Re:That's ok by plague3106 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My problem is that king of the hill is so unfunny and painful to watch. So i watch Futurama (which i think is pretty good), then i have to sit through that bore of a show KotH to get to the simpsons. If it was right before (or after) the simpsons, i'd defaintly watch it more. But i usually would rather miss it and KotH and get into something good.

  26. See also: by farnsworth · · Score: 4, Informative
    see also "X-Fry" and "X-Bender" http headers at http://slashdot.org

    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 21:29:08 GMT
    Server: Apache/1.3.20 (Unix) mod_perl/1.25
    mod_gzip/1.3.19.1a
    SLASH_LOG_DATA: shtml
    X-Powered-By: Slash 2.003000
    X-Fry: It's like a party in my mouth and everyone's throwing up.
    Connection: close
    Content-Type: text/html

    --

    There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

  27. FOX... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

    ...has a history of murdering its good shows (Family Guy, Futurama, Get a Life) while letting once-good shows languish (X-Files, the Simpsons, Ally McFucking Beal).

    People wonder why they're still the number 4 network; I don't.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:FOX... by Wntrmute · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm convinced that the Fox network execs are completely incompetant. Let's take a look:

      Futurama: About to go.
      Family Guy: About to go.
      The Tick: Gone, and never given a chance, with one of the worst timeslots on TV, opposite "Friends" and "Survivor".
      24: Possibly one of the best TV dramas *ever*, and was in danger of being pulled until it had great success with the critics and at the Golden Globes.
      Titus: One of the funnier sitcoms on TV, had it's episodes cut.
      Undeclared: Another decently funny show, which also had it's episodes cut. Note that the creator of this show is pissed, as Fox already screwed around with him on "Freaks and Geeks."
      Grounded for Life: Another decently funny show, had it episodes cut.
      Dark Angel: A show that developed a cult following in it's first season, then was moved to Friday, a night during which it's target demographic *isn't home*.

      These are just off the top of my head, this season alone. I'm sure if I thought back to seasons past, I could come up with more. With how abysmal ABC's lineup is right now, you'd think they'd take advantage of it. (Yeah, I pay *way* too much attention to pop culture, so sue me. :-)

  28. Defeatist attitude by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 2

    You can't fight the man.

    I'm going to be half-serious here...

    Dammit, that's what The Man wants you to think! The Man wants you to just sit down, shut up, and take whatever you get fed. You're not supposed to stand up with others who agree with you and say you want something to change, or stay the same. That would be interaction - and Big Media can't have that, beyond what little scraps the plebes get thrown with "online polls", "bulletin boards", and stupid contests.

    Try, man! Stand up and try! MST3K fans may have failed, but that doesn't mean they'll always fail.

    Hey, a mass letter-writing campaign worked for Star Trek. I'm sure us Futurama nerds can come up with some contemporary equivalent.

    FIGHT THE POWER!

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
  29. To quote the Simpsons. by Kenja · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fox turned into a hard core porn channel so gradually no one even noticed.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  30. Microsoft did this before. by _typo · · Score: 2

    So how is slashdoting an online petition any diferent from Microsoft rigging a poll? Slashdot is reaching new lows.

    (relax it's a joke)

    --

    Pedro Côrte-Real.

  31. Another network? by crow · · Score: 2

    So how much does it cost to make an episode of Futurama, anyway? That is probably one of the key questions in determining if Cartoon Network or possibly Comedy Central picks it up.

    Also, there may be legal issues. Some shows are made by outside companies and can switch networks when contracts expire or are terminated (e.g., Buffy). Others are made by the networks themselves, and don't have a prayer of ever moving to a channel not owned by that network. Is there any confirmation that Futurama is produced under a contract that will allow them to go to another network?

    Just questions. Too bad I can't post the answers.

  32. Futurama's other problem... by DragonPup · · Score: 3, Insightful

    7 PM EST sunday night? Talk about a toss it and forget it time slot! Half the episodes get preempted(and cancelled for the night) by sports events, award shows that we don't care about, etc

    If you gave Futurama the 8:30 slot(currently in use by Malcom in the Middle, directly after the Simpsons), Futurama would do a lot better ratings wise.

    -Henry

    --
    "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
  33. I will sound like a parrot, but here goes by forgoil · · Score: 2

    I guess I just wanted to write about it. I kinda had the feeling this would happen. I and many with me loves this show, but they haven't ordered more. I don't like many shows, and most I start to find boring before I come to the 10th episode. I still get all excited when there is a new Futurama out. I've seen them all, I ordered my Futurama DVD Box today (already got the Simpsons one of course) and I hunger for more. And this is what happens. I hope they move both Simpsons and Futurama to a nicer network, but I do wonder what will happen with the DVDs then.

    Life is unfair...
    -John

  34. Spellcheck The Petition Please! by GeekLife.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's dubious how much a network pays attention to these sort of online petitions, but it would greatly improve your chances if you spellchecked the petition first. And then have 10 people proofread it.

    happyness?
    quantitiys?
    possibilitiys?
    inivative?
    funnny?
    entertaing?
    unfinnished?
    interupting?

    And "Simpsons" should be capitalized as well. The networks probably won't listen anyway, but you might as well not give them specific excuses for discarding your petition.

  35. Here's the problem by vex24 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If Futurama is getting low ratings, it's for two reasons:

    1. Fox plays it at 7 PM. I'd always figured it would slip into the 8 PM spot when the Simpsons ended and quickly jump in ratings.

    2. Futurama viewers are not "average enough" to become Nielson viewing households. College students and Slashdot readers aren't "average" citizens. The "average" people are the ones that keep shows like "The View" and "WWF RAW" on the air. ;)

    --

    People shape laws. Not the other way around.

    1. Re:Here's the problem by anonymous+loser · · Score: 2
      Errm... Explain how Fox will know by looking at a letter that the author is a college student or slashdot reader.

      D43R F0CKS:

      1M 4 1337 81ZN355 3x3CU7iV3. PLZ D0N7 C4NC31 FU7UR4M4.

  36. Don't you people understand? by roystgnr · · Score: 5, Funny
    Fox just doesn't have enough room in it's busy schedule full of quality programming to squeeze in Futurama! Why, look at the Austin affiliate's jam packed lineup tonight:
    • The Teenage Sex and Drugs Hour (Formerly titled "That 70's Show" and "Undeclared")
    • 24 (Sure, there are rumors that this could go away and empty up an hour of space soon, but who knows: they could rename it "48" and surprise you!)
    • Fox 7 News at Nine (This takes up a whole hour, of course, because you just can't shave any time out of a local news channel and still preserve Fox's world-renowned reputation for journalistic depth and integrity. Tonight's banner headline from www.fox7.com: "Back pain can be excruciating!")
    • Um, er, well... that's it for current programming. But they surround it with four hours of reruns (allowing them to spend less on expensive new programming, and pass the savings on to you, the viewer!), "Fox 7 News at Five" (for the hour full of important breaking stories that just can't wait until 9), and the late night rerun of "Fox 7 News at Nine".

    And it goes on like that, night after night! Why would they want to air a clone of a successful Fox show like The Simpsons, when they can air "That 80's Show"? And have you seen the fan base behind "Grounded for Life"? You can't do a single search on Morpheus without tripping over DivX episodes of that runaway hit. And let's not forget the lucrative DVD revenues from "Titus"!

    Basically, there's no place for Futurama in the Fox lineup anymore. Saturday night is locked down with "Human Scum TV", craftily filling in the space between COPS and America's Most Wanted with COPS reruns! So what are they going to do? If only Fox was running three other humorous adult animation shows to fill out the rest of two hours, perhaps they'd be able to create some sort of thematically unified lineup, but where would they find three shows like that on short notice?
  37. 2 cents by NiftyNews · · Score: 2

    Just putting in my 2 cents. Save Futurama. The more geeks that reply to this story, the better.

  38. Very good point... by Pollux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I honestly feel that part of the reason why Futurama hasn't built up a huge fan base is because FOX never gave it a chance.

    To start things off, when Futurama was created by Matt Groening, FOX was joyous. The Simpsons were a huge hit, and FOX thought anything else by the hand of Matt Groening would be just as big a hit...as long as it was just like the Simpsons. The problem was that Groening didn't want that.

    I wish I had remembered what magazine it was, but there was an article back in 1998 which explained the creation of Futurama. When Groening told FOX that it was either his way or no way, FOX was real close to saying no, but the ratings they were getting from the Simpsons was too good to let go. Even then, there was a lot of clash between FOX and Groening in the development of Futurama, mostly because FOX wanted a Simpsons knockoff.

    When Futurama hit the air, guess who first watched it? Simpsons fans, and pretty much ONLY Simpsons fans, because FOX advertised it that way. "From the creator of the Simpsons..." was emphasized more than "A New show...". Many Simpsons fans who were expecting a knockoff stopped watching it when they realized it wasn't, and many others left because they wern't used to a different kind of comedy (Simpsons had the same problems during the first two seasons, but they won it out).

    Well, when you have a drop in the original fan base, and no increase in a new fanbase, ratings fall. When ratings fall, the show gets preemted for shows with higher ratings. The third season of Futurama didn't start until the second week of November, and this season didn't start until the third week. Even then, we've only seen four-or-so new episodes, since as Cheesemaker said, NFL has otherwise preemted Futurama.

    FOX is making a big mistake if they cancel Futurama, especially because they just haven't made the effort to promote it to new people (rather than just Simpsons fans). When I visited Norway last summer, I found out that many of the teenagers (at least in southern Norway) love Futurama, even more than the Simpsons, because Fry's character reflects that of a typical 20th century high school kid.

    Just for the record, I hope everyone realizes that each decade has at least one show that the TV execs thought was a failure, but instead became a big hit in syndication. The Brady Bunch made it only through five seasons, Giligans Island only survived for three, and need I remind everyone that Star Trek only sailed the skies for four?

    My only wish is that FOX doesn't give the same fate to Futurama.

  39. A Different Plan for Futurama by johnstewart · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't cancel it, just rename it to match the other fine, fine programming on FOX.

    Some potential winners:

    - Temptation Spaceship 5
    - When Aliens Attack
    - Who Wants to Marry a One-Eyed Woman?
    - Bender in the Middle
    - That 2970's Show

  40. Question by NiftyNews · · Score: 2

    Just to be rational, I'd like to know two things:

    1) What is the highest total of online signatures a TV show has recevied on this or similar websites.

    2) Did it matter?

  41. Re:Burn out vs. Fade away? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > But was there any inidication? Were they going down hill? And of course the most important question: What on earth do they have that's gonna be better? Fear Factor with Hentai Anime?

    Sigh, I'll miss Futurama - one of the few things I can be bothered to watch.

    But look on the bright side - if anyone ever does decide to cross Fear Factor with hentai, FOX will air it ;-)

  42. No great loss by hyacinthus · · Score: 2

    I watched "Futurama" for a while. I have to admit that it was (usually) funnier than "The Simpsons" was at the same time. (But, let's face it, my old college roommate after a few beers is funnier than "The Simpsons" has been in the last few seasons.) And sometimes, usually when it was making fun of some current or not-so-current event, it achieved a cockeyed kind of greatness (e.g. the _Titanic_ parody, or the episode where Bender does a Joe Hazelwood, only by not drinking.)

    But "Futurama" was a mean, nasty little show in comparison to "The Simpsons" at its best. "The Simpsons" in its early seasons was wicked, but it never lost sight of the essential humanity of its characters. Homer was dumb and often small-minded, but he'd occasionally come through and do the right thing. Lisa was there to remind us that even the worst of families can sometimes produce something right. Hell, even Bart had his moments.

    But "Futurama" had nothing but contempt for its characters. Fry has never been anything else but an idiot. Bender is...well, Bender; if he ever deviates from his cruel, mean-spirited ways, it's for the sake of a cheap joke. Leela provides some counterbalance, I suppose, but more often than not the show seems bent on finding some way to humiliate her (qq.v. any episode with Zapp Brannigan, the "Married with Children" parody episode.)

    Hey, but if you get your kicks from cruelty masquerading as comedy, then you'll be sorry to see "Futurama" go. I won't be.

    hyacinthus.

  43. Re:3rd Rock Stays?! by Chris+Parrinello · · Score: 2

    Ummm... dude. 3rd Rock was cancelled last year. Not to mention that 3rd Rock was an NBC show.

    And Futurama and the Simpsons are both Fox shows. It would be a little difficult for Fox to schedule a show against another show on the same network.

    But don't let the fact get in the way of your rant... :)

  44. Move along folks by dbrower · · Score: 2

    let me be the wet blanket that says Futurama should be let go quietly. It was past it's due date, and well, sometimes you have to let go.

    -dB

    --
    "It if was easy to do, we'd find someone cheaper than you to do it."
  45. i couldn't give a hoot. by Hooya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i hate tv. if you tape one of these shows and watch it in fast forward you'll know what i mean. 30 minutes show means 20 minutes of ads and 10 minutes of what is on the tv guide. no thank you. that's why i don't bother with cable/satallite/what-have-you. just news please. recently i've even stopped watching the news even. it's nothing short of cliffhangers full of sansationalism -- "an area women gives birth to seven headed green baby; news at 9". or "investigative reports!! 25 lifers are on the loose -- your life may be in danger -- news at 10". if my life was in danger, i'd really fucking appriciate them telling me now. who knows i may get my throat slit before 10. what a bunch of retards. TV has become an updatable billboard that people pay to get into their homes. someone's gonna have to pay me to get one of these things into my living room.

  46. Re:Andy's show should kick ass by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    and greg the bunny... problem is, like futurama and company, they are also "edge" shows

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  47. I did my part by bartle · · Score: 2
    A few weeks ago when the Nielsen people called at an inconvenient time and hounded me about doing a survey, I agreed to it. For those that have never done a media survey before, they are an annoyance. The burden is on you to keep a log and mail it out, every once in a while you'll get a phone call to make sure you're keeping up on it. It's a real intrusion into your life with no immediate benefits other than the few dollars they send to guilt you into doing your journal.

    I felt it important to do because my tastes are not mainstream and if I don't make my interests known no one will cater to me. I did watch Futurama on Sunday night and it did go in my little log. I bring this up because I wonder how many Slashdotters watch Futurama, enjoy Futurama, but blew off a similiar caller because they didn't want to deal with the hassle or privacy issues.

  48. Re:Why in the world is anyone surprised? by Aexia · · Score: 2

    >>Or in this case, a million blind monkeys at work on a million typewriters can produce the entire Fox fall lineup.

    What do you mean "can"? They *did*.

  49. online petitions.. by MathJMendl · · Score: 3, Funny

    To be quite honest, while I love shows like The Family Guy and Futurama, I question how much petitions like this do. True, they gave it a terrible timeslot, but the real "petition" is to watch it (although without a Nielsen box it doesn't do much).

    I mean, looking through the petitions on petitiononline.com, we see:

    1337 sp3ak in 5(}{00l !!

    A petition to the WWF in honor of the Undertaker
    Let's Import Japan

    A bit hard to take this seriously, especially considering how little effort it takes to sign a petition. A bigger noise would be made by sending postcards, that would fill their mailboxes.

    --


    "I have not failed. I've simply found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Edison
    1. Re:online petitions.. by VP · · Score: 2, Funny

      The scariest thing is, the WWF petition has much less spelling errors than the Futurama petition...

    2. Re:online petitions.. by Skirwan · · Score: 2

      For those philistines among us who don't regularly read Penny Arcade, the petition to import Japan is best explained here.

      --
      Damn the Emperor!

    3. Re:online petitions.. by daeley · · Score: 2

      ...much *fewer* spelling errors. ;-)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  50. leela by ainsoph · · Score: 4, Funny

    who else thinks Leela is sexy?

    1. Re:leela by NaturePhotog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Eye do! :-)

  51. Re:Synchronicity by Cruciform · · Score: 2

    I'm trying to remember all the torture scenes in movies and that one seems to evade me... damn.

    I liked how they beat Sean Penn's character around with the phone book in 'Falcon and the Snowman'. Best use of 'Reach out and touch someone' I ever saw. The guy he was playing was such a jackass.

  52. To quote the Simpsons: by thermostat42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You know, Fox turned into a Hard core sex channel so gradually, I didn't even notice."
    - Marge

    --
    no comment
  53. online petition.... by canning · · Score: 2
    maybe we should sign up in shifts, I don't know how popular we'd be if we slashdotted their server.

    --
    I love the smell of Karma in the morning
  54. Re:Synchronicity by RollingThunder · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reservoir Dogs.

    I still get the shivers from the song they played during it, "Stuck in the Middle With You".

    An interesting analysis on that I found when doublechecking the song title:
    http://www.redstone-tech.com/gerry/res_dogs.htm

  55. Re:What about Family Guy? by geekoid · · Score: 2

    No geek content in Family Guy.
    Tons of geek content in Futurama.
    This is a geek site.
    Now, I've given you the pieces, can you figure it out?

    There were a lot of save family guy sites.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  56. Re:Synchronicity by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

    That's Babylon 5, isn't it? When the interrogator is working him over on Earth.

  57. Production costs by molrak · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's doubtful that Futurama or Family Guy could make the transition to cable using their current production methods. According to one Family Guy FAQ, the average production cost of each episode is $1.1 million (U.S.). While that's peanuts for network television (for example, Friends' 6 primary cast members are almost making that much an episode per 'Friend'), 1.1 mil is still outside the reach of most cable outlets. In all probability, Futurama probably costs more due to the 3-d effects employed in its animation, and also has a higher profile voice cast (Billy West, Katey Sagal, and John Dimaggio [who won the Annie this year for best voice actor]). So the only chances of Futurama's survival are Fox or another network.

    --
    You're only as smart as your brain.
  58. Two More Words: Adult Swim by cryptochrome · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yea verily, there is a place for canceled animated satire. It is called Adult Swim, and it is on Cartoon Network on Sundays, and already it has become a home for Baby Blues, Home Movies, Mission Hill, and the Oblongs. Unfortunately...

    1) Cartoon Network is part of Time-Warner, which isn't on good terms with Fox. (Same problem with Comedy Central though).

    2) Cartoon Network and Adult Swim are not well known with the mainstream adult audience, although they should be.

    3) Cartoon Network doesn't have the cash for expensive shows, hence their reliance on low budget original shows and syndicated cancelled ones. They could afford to pick up existing Futurama episodes, but probably not make new ones.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

    1. Re:Two More Words: Adult Swim by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

      While The Critic (along with many other shows) certainly suits Adult Swim, this is the first I've heard about them actually picking it up. They're already playing late nights on Comedy Central. Where'd you hear this?

      --

      ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  59. In memory of bender by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Bite my Shiny metal ass....FOX

    The problem is FOX has major sports, thats where they believe the money is.
    Hopefully another station will start doing what FOX did to get its rating up, and that is running cutting edge, and chancy, tv shows.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  60. Re:OT: Name That Reference! by Cruciform · · Score: 2

    Hmmm, it was... oh wait, I offered that guy a bagel after I hooked his genitals up to the crank phone in my field pack. So it wasn't that.

    Was it a Monty Python skit? Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! I never did see that one in completion.

  61. CF Roswell? by horsell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe we should all agree the day to send the letters to fox? That's what the Roswell guys did, we'll have to see if that works. But, the idea of having all the letters arrive all at once so they look all the more impressive strikes me as quite a nifty one :)

  62. Try a spellchecker and a few English lessons by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hey, I'm no Anglo-centrist, but it seems to me that a petition like this would be taken more seriously if it wasn't loaded with spelling and grammatical errors. "What kind of people would think something like this is important?" you might ask. The kind of people who would cancel a great show like Futurama. Seriously, good spelling and grammar will get you a lot further.

  63. Just another one... by powerlinekid · · Score: 2

    Its kind of funny... theres a quote from the simpsons xfiles episode where homer goes "Yeah and people don't believe me, we can just sell it to the fox network." and Bart follows up with "yeah they'll buy anthing". Haha... the sad thing is fox always cancels their best shows... the family guy is the best cartoon since simpsons and southpark. Hilariously random. Futurama was alright, I wasn't a big watcher... but alot of people swear by it. The critic was awesome, thank god ccentral picked up it on syndicate. The tick was alright... i watched one episode and it did make me laugh. Anyway, the point as if i had one... i think fox doesn't know whats good on its channel. They seem to be trying please all demographics except the 15-35 year old white male one, which lets be honest is definitly what adult cartoons are more aimed for. Its sad...

    --

    can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  64. I would watch if I could by Fweeky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Unfortunately, being among the majority of people in the known Universe, I don't get 1000 channels to choose from, so unless it's going to be on terrestrial or Sky One (which already has constant reruns of The Simpsons, 3-4/day ffs) or so, the closest me and 10 million other Brits are going to get to seeing it is a dodgy DivX :(

    So far I've seen the first series cut very badly on Channel 4, the first two in crappy .rm format, and about 3 DivXed episodes after that.

  65. Re:A WINNER IS YOU! by demaria · · Score: 2

    Yeah but it was corned beef not roast beef.

  66. Paper Address to mail letters! by theDigitizer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the Fox.com website -

    HERE

    Futurama
    P.O. Box 900
    Attn: Futurama
    Beverly Hills, CA 90213-0900

    Send those letters! Snail mail is the only thing they listen to. Not online petitions or e-mail!

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, I don't actually make my website for other people to look at.
  67. Not that I expect results, but... by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    ...I went and signed the online petition to save Futurama, and while I was there put my name to the ones for Family Guy and Undeclared as well.

    Anyone noticed that Fox seems to always cancel its good shows, while keeping unfunny shit like Malcolm in the Middle on along with voyeur crapola like Temptation Island?

    When they finally do away with *all* the shows I love, I'll have to start referring to Fox as "the good taste takes a holiday" network.

    ~Philly

  68. Then why make a DVD?? by DeadBugs · · Score: 2

    If it's so unpopular then why are they making a DVD box set for season 1, which appears to be already available in Europe And also info from the FOX Germany site I guess I need to get a Region 2 DVD player

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  69. Why it really got cancelled by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
    Network exec #1: The whole Futurama thing is just so ironic '90's, you know. That concept's done to death.

    Network exec #2: Yeah, and that Groenig guy's from Portland, anyway... Who the hell comes from Portland, for God's sake? And he can't even draw!

    Network exec #3: The numbers are sucking, too. That ironic thing is tired. But before we cancel it, we gotta come up with a show for that slot.

    Network exec #2: Well, the market surveys say that sincerity and wholesomeness is hot right now but, somehow, bringing back the Osmonds just doesn't seem right.

    Network exec #1: But people still like cartoons. I got it! The Family Circus Hour. We could do production in Japan and keep costs down...

    Network exec #2: Yeah, but it still has to be a bit edgy. You know, send the mom back to work...

    Network exec #3: As a stripper!!! Those Japanese cartoonists could do some nice stuff to Mom's cleavage!

    Network exec #2: The stripper's a good touch! It'll get the 14-25 YM demographic.

    Network exec #1: Boys, I think we got a real winner here. We'll call it "The Family Circus - Mom's a Stripper - Hour. That's just the working title, of course. Joe, call legal to get us the rights; Jim, call Eddie Johnson to hack us a script together; Bill, call Okutaka-san to set up the anime contract. Marvin, go ahead with the press release saying that we're cancalling that Futurama turkey and get the press rolling for TFCMSH. This new show is going to be ratings heaven!!!!

    --
    That is all.
  70. Re:What about Family Guy? by neurovish · · Score: 2, Funny

    The difference is:
    Family Guy gets cancelled after every season

    It's kind of like their replacement for the season finale I guess.

  71. Write via dead tree by isorox · · Score: 2
    Great publicity, thousands of people from slashdot will sign the petition. Unfortunatly a floppy disk with the petion on isnt very impressive.

    Even as a poor impoverished student I'm sending letters (signed by a few of us) to fox, and I like in europe.

    You need to write letters. Go buy 6 letters and stamps at the local mall/post office, we have some mailing to do during the next few days. International public, too! Airmail is only a like 1 or 2 euros or equivalent. A letter is worth about 1000 petition entries. Some stuff to include: Hugely popular overseas, potent quality public, never having a chance to grow due to severe time slot sabotage. Have a look at the petition text for hints on what to write and add anything YOU can think of. It's your letter. No excuses for not getting a pen right now!


    it was pen and paper that brought back the original series of star trek, not a 30 second petition signing.
  72. How Ridiculous by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 2

    First Family Guy, now Futurama. Fox seems hell-bent on making sure I never watch their crappy network again. I have religiously watched both of these shows since their inception despite constant preemption, horrible timeslots (Family Guy went up against both Survivor *and* Friends), and lackluster promotion. I even have every episode in MPEG and my friends and I watch them all the time when we can't see new eps/reruns on TV. When people come over and I show them the shows most of them have never even *heard* of Family Guy (or sometimes even Futurama) yet when they leave they love it. I'm tellin' ya, there ain't no justice (tanj!).

  73. Re:Synchronicity by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    (ob 9/11: why hasn't anyone arrested Stephen King for writing about a plane crashing into the network skyscraper?)


    well, for 1 it was Stephen King who wrote a book similar to what happened on 9/11
    for 2, the author that did did so because its was a common theory that the future of warfare would go that direction.. there are numerous books on terrorist activities that discuss such a possibility.

  74. ...Screw Fox! by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 2

    I'm gonna start my own network! With blackjack...and hookers! In fact, forget the network!

    (with all apologies to Futurama)

    1. Re:...Screw Fox! by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Alright, if everyone's done being stupid...

      I had more, but... you go ahead.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  75. Going About This The Wrong Way by JPawloski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I heard an interview with a man that worked for a valley (Phoenix) radio station, and he was talking about public feedback. The most surprisingly thing he said was that, in general, stations tend to ignore mass-petitions like the one in the article. The logic behind this was that the people who set forth the petition are making a significant effort to save a show, and this may sway people's opinions. On the other hand, viewers or listeners who take it upon themselves to write into a station are given a significant weight. The amount of weight depends on the number of overall listeners and probably some deep statistical reasoning, but I do know from the anecdote he gave that for 910 KFYI (now 550 KFYI) one individual writing a letter is considered to represent 8,800 people.

    Remember, an unsolicited opinion is always better than a solicited opinion. This is the same principle.

    So instead of signing the petition, WRITE A LETTER (not e-mail, the old kind of letter where you put a stamp on). If everyone who had signed the petition had written a letter, I can almost guarantee you Fox would put FR back on TV.

  76. Pure genious by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    Futurama is pur genious, all packaged into a 30 minute spot for our consumption. Its an awesome cartoon, with some really deep humor, especially for us geek types.

    I can't believe they're canceling it!! Christ, they haven't had it on the air in any regular schedule for the past year! Of course its probably had poor numbers, nobody ever knows when its going to be on!!! Are things not this obvious to the clowns over at Fox?

    I don't watch much TV... it sucks anyway.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  77. ... the family guy! by burtonator · · Score: 2

    They also axed the family guy.

    The futurama and the cable guy were the best shows on TV!

    I never missed an episode.

  78. Show that is REPLACING futurama =(((( by NewSegway · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Who Wants to Marry Temptation Island Millionaires in the Chamber... While Animals Attack?"

  79. Futurama IS a knockoff by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Note: this is not a flamebait. I'm a huge fan of both the Simpsons and Futurama. In my opinion, Futurama is the better show.

    But the truth is that Futurama really is extremely similar to the Simpsons. The type of animation is exactly the same. The music's very similar. The voices are similar. The jokes are similar. The whole style, soul and idea of the show is the same. The only thing that's different is the period in time they're supposed to take place. Don't agree? Consider a hypothetical show by the name "Simpsons 3000". Can you imagine such a show not being very very similar to Futurama?

    You can argue all you want that Futurama is a great show that should be kept on the air - and I'm all with you - but don't tell me it's not a Simpsons knockoff. Believe me, it is, and it's worth saving anyway.

    --

    "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    1. Re:Futurama IS a knockoff by bludstone · · Score: 2

      "The type of animation is exactly the same. "

      No it isnt.

      Futurama uses detailed computer graphics with cel shading, and it shows. The Simpsons are still traditional cel and paint slave labor.

      The style and character design, however, are extremely similar. :)

      --

      no .sig
  80. Re:Was Futurama was even on tv this year? by schon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can it get bad ratings when they never show it?

    Thanks - you just provided insight into why it's been cancelled - so it can never get bad ratings!

    By cancelling it, they not only make sure that it never gets bad ratings, but they don't have to pay for it either!

    (I'm laughing as I write this, but it scares me that it just might be what's going through some Fox executive's head.)

  81. What would make more sense... by eclectric · · Score: 2

    Move Futurama and The Family Guy to the soon-to-be vacated 9:00 sunday night slot. Just more proof that entertainment-by-committee just doesn't work.

  82. Good News, Everyone. by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 2

    I have it on good authority that Fox is replacing Futurama with the XFL.

    Hooray!

    --
    (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
  83. Re:What about Family Guy? by aka-ed · · Score: 2
    Funny you should mention that, as my cat's litter-box also rivals the Fox program Family Guy in entertainment value. What a coincidence!

    --
    I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  84. coincidence? by night_flyer · · Score: 2
    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  85. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  86. Re:Why in the world is anyone surprised? by bonzoesc · · Score: 2
    Aexia had this to say about Robocop:
    What do you mean "can"? They *did*.
    Wrong - 10 monkeys, 10 minutes.
  87. My Wacko Theory by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    People like me watch Family Guy and Futurama. We don't care about the timeslot because we have Tivos, so we don't miss episodes. But, since we have Tivos, we don't watch commercials. Ergo, making stuff I want to see, doesn't pay.

    People who watch Temptation Island, do watch commercials, and they download and excecute the code that tells them what to like and buy -- that's the whole reason those people watch that crap in the first place. Ergo, it pays to make crap.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  88. Bah! by CyberDruid · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll produce my own Futurama-show... With black jack... And hookers!
    In fact, forget the show.
    And the black jack.

    Aehhh... screw the whole thing! :(

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

    1. Re:Bah! by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Owww. My side. THat was just about the funniest things I've read in a long, loooong time.

      Still one of my favorite [adapted] Futurama quotes, although "'Please, don't be alarmed, we're harmless!' 'I have THREE arms!' 'I said harmless, not armless!'" has to beat it out, IMNSHO...

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  89. X-Fry by mcmanus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey Bender, will the futurama references be cancelled
    from the next version of slashcode too? (gotta stay current!)


    /home/person>telnet slashdot.org 80
    Trying 64.28.67.150...
    Connected to slashdot.org.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    HEAD / HTTP/1.1
    host: slashdot.org:80

    HTTP/1.1 200 OK
    Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 03:20:08 GMT
    Server: Apache/1.3.20 (Unix) mod_perl/1.25 mod_gzip/1.3.19.1a
    SLASH_LOG_DATA: shtml
    X-Powered-By: Slash 2.003000
    X-Fry: I'm gonna be a science fiction hero, just like Uhura, or Captain Janeway, or Xena!
    Connection: close
    Content-Type: text/html

    Connection closed by foreign host.

  90. Nah...think I'll pass by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    I used to love this show, then I started missing it when fox started to juggle it around.

    Then they had that terrible xmas episode this last year. After watching that episode, I decided I'd never watch the show again. It was just wrong, and this is coming from someone who loves the original south park (the 5 minute short).

  91. Dana Gould has killed the Simpsons by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Slightly off-topic, but since the subject has come to the Simpsons, I must say this.

    HOMR is from last season, probably the last half-decent season the Simpsons will ever see. While Season 12 had more than the normal share of not-very-good episodes, this season has been truly awful. The reason is simple, and his name is Dana Gould.

    For those of you who don't know, Dana Gould is a failed stand-up comic who is now taking his lowest common denominator humor to the Simpsons and is singularly responsible for it's current lackluster -- hell, let's just be honest, god-awful humor. Homer getting raped by a panda? Homer finding a corpse as a child? The constant rehashing of previous plot-lines and characters? Say thank you to Dana.

    I now find myself tuning in every Sunday night with my fingers crossed, repeating a mantra of "Please don't suck... please don't suck" and for this entire season I have been disapointed. Certainly there were funny jokes. But the Simpsons has turned into stringing forced "big-laughs" into loosely-woven plotlines than generally tend to revolve around celebrities or Homer being an idiot. If you check the 2/10/02 episode, you'll count almost twenty-five producers. 25 producers. Management is strangling the life out of this wonderful series while Dana Gould stomps on its putrifying corpse with his steel-toed jack-boots.

    I think Lisa's hypothetical question at the end of the 1/6/02 episode says it all: "Is this the end of our series" ... "of events?"

    1. Re:Dana Gould has killed the Simpsons by M-G · · Score: 2

      Is Gould responsible for the disconnected story lines that have been going on lately? For example, the one where Bart is digging a hole in the backyard at the beginning. They follow that thread for a few minutes, then go to something completely different. Same thing with the other night and the Gay Pride parade.

      Sure, those bits had their funny parts, but they were completely disconnected from the rest of the show, as though the writers lacked the talent to come up with enough story line to fill an episode.

  92. First time on slashdot by spacefrog · · Score: 3, Funny

    A slashbot actually complaining that there isn't enough advertising.

    Hang on while I scrape this ice off satan's windshield.

  93. Trying very hard to understand the logic: by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 5, Interesting



    I am a young, educated professional with pretty hefty chunk of disposable income. Most of my friends are young, educated professionals with a hefty chunks of disposable income. Most of my friends enjoy the same shows I do (things like futurama, family guy, adult swim, and others). Now, as far as I know, young professionals with disposable income is a pretty choice demographic.

    So why is it good shows that people like me watch always seem to be going off the air just when I start to enjoy them, while shows that seem to appeal to a, er, less desirable demographic seem to succeed? Something like 'Temptation Island' may get a large viewer base, but from what I've experienced (and I don't claim to be an expert), those types of people would be of little interest to advertisers, save places like Wal-mart or used car dealerships with a large inventory of pickup trucks.

    I'm not trying to be elitist, I'm sure at one point I'll get married and the drudgery of work and family will stretch my mind so much I'll take solace in the soothing simplicity of bad TV, while stretching my wallet to the point where sales at Wal-Mart will become interesting. But for the time being, well, I'm not.

    So I've been trying to figure out why Fox has handled Futurama the way they have, and this is what I've come up with.

    1. The ratings system is really, really off base. Somehow, the companies who track ratings are giving incorrect numbers back to the networks, or the advertisers are reading them wrong. In college I was an account executive for a radio station (meaning I sold advertising). I found extensive frustration in the fact that our numbers were always very low while our ads always had such good direct feedback. I remember once a failed pitch I had with the owner of a bicycle shop, who would buy ads from a competitor (a country and western station) that cost 10 times as much as ours. Why? Because their ratings were higher. While I'm sure people who like country buy bicycles, after years of advertising the stores prime clientele appeared to remain the sort of people who preferred rock.

    2. The networks are full of idiots. I don't mean their stupid because the shows are so bad; It's been decades since quality was a priority, only money matters now. (Rupert Murdoch even admitted years ago in an interview that the only show he really enjoys watching on his network was the 'Simpsons'). But even with money a priority, they still manage to muck it up. If you have a show with promise that's starting to catch on, you don't run it in a timeslot opposite a highly popular show on another network, then shrug your shoulders thinking 'oh I wonder why the ratings went down'. They make programming changes that succeed more in alienating viewers then to expose new shows. They seem to over promote the sort of stuff that just won't catch on, and ignore shows that might attract viewers.

    3. The advertisers are idiots. Television is a for-profit business, and in all fairness, they will do whatever it takes to accommodate their revenue stream. On the other hand, it's the job of the people in marketing to get their message out to the largest number of potential customers for the least amount of money. So why then do I see ads for tampons during reruns of 'The A-Team'? Sure, woman watch 'The A-Team', but it seems to me they could have spent the cash for the A-team spot on another show that would reach a larger number of potential customers for the same amount of money. So many times I see an ad on TV and think 'I can't of anyone who would watch this show that would buy this product'.

    For all the money advertisers spend on research and production, they so often forget about actually reaching their target demographic when it's time to buy ad space. A show like Futurama may only get 150,000 viewers (I'm making these numbers up for the sake of example), but if 75% of those viewers are likely to spend more then $1,000 a year on electronic equipment, you have a pretty solid demographic for the electronics based industry. . .at least enough to keep the show running. But instead of looking at those demographics, a company will spend more money to buy a spot on a show that has a viewer base of 1 million (say, a temptation island), despite the fact that only 5% of those viewers are in their demographic. Do a little math, and you realize there are some misplaced resources.

    4. People are idiots. We put up with poor programming. We pay extra for cable so we can receive more channels with more advertising. We holler and scream when our favorite shows are canceled and beg networks to let us make money for them. It could be that all my armchair analysis above is wrong. There is some deep logical reasoning for the seemingly asinine behavior of the networks and advertisers that maximizes profits. It could be this model will continue to be used so as long as we put up with it despite the fact that no viewer is ever really satisfied.

    I'd like to think it's some sort of combination of the first three, but there is this sad, nagging voice that tells me it's all 4.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Trying very hard to understand the logic: by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

      Point taken. But it really does beg the question, who are all these people out there watching shows like Temptation Island or The Chamber? I'm going to generalize again, but I have this picture in my mind of dad sitting in the easy chair in his undershirt sipping Coors light while mom is in sweat pants finishing off a bag of potato chips.

      Nobody I know likes this stuff, so there must be a huge number of faceless Americans out there who exist on a completely different cultural level then myself. I want to know who they are, and how did we as a society failed them by making sub-par low brow entertainment their most attractive choice?

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  94. For all of you who missed it on TV by Shiny+Metal+S. · · Score: 2

    See the #futurama IRC channel on Dalnet.

    --

    ~shiny
    WILL HACK FOR $$$

  95. let it go, it could have been done better by mr.ska · · Score: 2
    While I personally enjoyed Futurama, I found that it relied far, far, FAR, FAR too heavily on 20th/21st century references. What, living in the year 3000 can't stand on its own feet? Do you have to bring back millennium-old actors, politicians, celebrities, singers, and the like? It's a crutch, nothing more.

    The characters were great. The interaction was great. The animation was great. But for the love of God, don't you think you should be able to be funny in the year 3000 without winding the clock back? Geez, it's even worse than those Star Trek TOS and TNG time-travel-to-old-earth episodes.

    I'll miss Futurama, especially Bender, but I'm sure that Matt's twisted mind can come up with something equally good, if not even better, sometime soon. Farewell Zoiberg, I hardly GLLLBBLBBLLBLBL!!! ye.

    --

    Mr. Ska

  96. Banner / button by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2

    Could someone with a Gimp talent make a banner and a button to put on web sites? I think that would be a nice idea, now if we could just figure out a link we could point it to. :)

  97. FOX REGIONAL VP EMAIL ADDRESSES by swordboy · · Score: 2
    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  98. A better show that should have been saved by jdavidb · · Score: 2

    I hate Futurama. I guess I'm the only one. But I can't believe people have a letter writing campaign for this, but nobody did anything about The Lone Gunmen. That was the funniest show I've seen in a long time. Sure the pilot wasn't that good (did anyone besides me notice how eerily similar the plot of the pilot was to the September 11 attacks? or am I the only one who actually watched it?), but it got better.



    Sigh.

  99. Only sign if you are a Nielsen family by Tom7 · · Score: 2

    Guess what? Fox has no idea whether I watch Futurama or not. They only know aggregate data collected from Nielsen participants.

    The point is -- they already know how many people watch it. Maybe they just need to know how many rabid fans there are...

    But anyway, I actually do hope these petitions for TV shows go away. I like TV sometimes, but anybody who's in love with a show so much to make a petition about it ... well, they need to watch less TV.

  100. they did that already by mikemulvaney · · Score: 2

    Perhaps FOX should switch the timeslots of Futurama and Malcolm in the Middle for, say, a month.

    Futurama came on after the Simpsons for at least the first full season. And guess what? No one watched it.

    Just face it: more people like Malcolm in the Middle, for God knows what reason. And more people like That 70's Show, and more people like Boston Public, and more people like Ally McBeal, and more people like to watch football. Futurama is a niche show, and regardless of how good it is, Fox doesn't have to show it if no one is going to watch it.

    Futurama wasn't killed by its bad time slot; it died well before that. We were lucky that they kept showing it as long they did...

    -Mike

  101. Re:What a Load of Shit by dinivin · · Score: 2

    Futurama isn't BAD, I just don't find it nearly as funny.

    It's not our fault that you have no sense of humor.

    Dinivin

  102. Not Cancelled!!!! by geekoid · · Score: 2

    It seems that fox has a back log of 30 futurama episodes, that is why it chose night to sign to make more for next year.
    Also, Matt owns the series, not FOX, so if fox cancel, there is always hope that it will get pick up else where.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect