Slashdot Mirror


Stealth Asteroid Misses Earth

Paradoxish writes: "Gah. According to cnn.com an asteroid hiding in an astronomical blindspot nearly blindsided Earth. The scary part is that scientists didn't notice it until four days AFTER it passed by. Apparently, it would've been similiar to the Tunguska explosion. Scary." As long as they keep missing Earth, we're OK.

161 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, no... by O2n · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I'll really get to live to see the HURD released...

    [ducks]

  2. Actually... by gergi · · Score: 5, Funny

    The asteroid was installed with a propulsion system and aimed at New Jersey. Unfortunately, due to a conversion factor from metric units, the asteroid missed Earth completely.

    --
    Nosce te Ipsum
    1. Re:Actually... by CokeBear · · Score: 2

      Him and Wil Wheaton should run for Congress/Senate/President.

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
  3. Does anyone know by linzeal · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What would happen if an asteroid of a given size hit the moon? A place with equations on velocity, density, and angle of entry for the meteor would be nice.

    I would imagine that impact material from the moon could make secondary impacts on earth and the ocean would be a little whacky. Could a tsunami be born out of such an event if the asteroid was large enough?

    1. Re:Does anyone know by Enry · · Score: 2

      Take a look at the moon sometime and see the nice (bigger) craters on the moon. It's been hit before, it will be hit again, it will still be there tomorrow.

    2. Re:Does anyone know by Negadecimal · · Score: 3, Funny

      What would happen if an asteroid of a given size hit the moon?

      If it had the same mass as the moon and collided on a tangent to the moon's orbit, it would replace the moon in our sky. Our "old" moon would go flying off into space.

      That would be cool. Kind of like one of those executive toys. Of course, I'm assuming an unlikely inelastic reaction...

    3. Re:Does anyone know by SrlKlr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What would happen if an asteroid of a given size hit the moon?

      What is more interesting is if you think about what would happen if the moon was to go away (like maybe knocked out of orbit or something like that). Forget the simple things like screwing up light at night and night time criters. Think about tides and how they are directly affected by the moon. And since the weather is extremely dependant upon the temperature of the ocean, this would completely, change the weather across the globe. Colder areas would become colder and warmer areas would become warmer without some type of climate circulation. Lots of factors for a hunk of rock flying around the globe...

    4. Re:Does anyone know by l810c · · Score: 2, Funny

      Would this cure lycanthropy?

    5. Re:Does anyone know by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

      asteroids hit the moon all the time... it doesn't have an atmosphere, that is why it has all those craters.

      i have no idea how big an asteroid would have to be to completely fuck things up, but there are some HUGE craters already there.

      --
      MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    6. Re:Does anyone know by quantaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm appalled! Imagine someone posting something that isn't completely original on slashdot!!

      --
      I stole this Sig
    7. Re:Does anyone know by denzo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Equation for momentum: m_a*v_a + m_b*v_b = m_a*v_a' + m_b*v_b'

      The LHS is initial velocities, and RHS is final velocities. Since an asteroid collision would likely be a plastic collision (i.e., object stick together), the final velocities for objects A & B would be the same. Assume that the moon's velocity is zero, since we are determining the relative change in velocity. Thus you would get an equation like thus to find the final velocity of both objects combined:

      v' = (m_asteroid * v_asteroid)/(m_asteroid + m_moon)
      Where m_moon = 7.35E22 kg. Assume that v_asteroid = 10km/s, and in order to get a significant change in the moon's velocity (say 1 m/s), the asteroid would need to be going 7.35E18 m/s. If the asteroid was the same density as the moon (3340 kg/m^3), then that would mean a spherical asteroid of a diameter of 16 km. (assuming that I did that all right).

      Pretty big asteroid, I think a global killer is considered to be a 1 km long asteroid. Recalculate the above equation for different assumptions.

    8. Re:Does anyone know by Tattva · · Score: 2
      What is more interesting is if you think about what would happen if the moon was to go away ... Colder areas would become colder and warmer areas would become warmer without some type of climate circulation

      Well, I for one will take this scenario over a 100 ft super-saiyan Gorilla.

      --
      personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
    9. Re:Does anyone know by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Of course, I'm assuming an unlikely inelastic reaction...

      At that kind of energy level solid rock flows like a fluid. Fluids do not have inelastic collisions.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    10. Re:Does anyone know by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Neil Comins wrote a great book about this and other interesting concepts like it. The book is literally titled What If The Moon Didn't Exist?. I own an ancient copy in hardcover, but it's still a great "what if" science book. (As opposed to the good "what if" science fiction books).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  4. It seems like by DeltaBlaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems like we are starting to hear about some asteroid missing us a few times a year now. Has anyone ever heard of Nasa having any sort of plan on what to do if an asteriod ever was going to hit earth? (Even though according to that article the odds are currently 1 in 10 million")

    --
    (This Space For Rent) ....($50 A Month).... (Contact The Voices In Your Head)
    1. Re:It seems like by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Interesting
      > Has anyone ever heard of Nasa having any sort of plan on what to do if an asteriod ever was going to hit earth?

      Has anyone ever heard of Congress giving NASA the budget required to come up with any plan more effective than "Put your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye."

      The dinosaurs are extinct because they lacked a space program.

      More the pity homo sapiens, who was smart enough to invent rockets, smart enough to realize the nature of the threat, but too dumb to do anything about it.

      Prediction: 24 hours after the asteroid impact, the surviving Congresscritters call upon the surviving sheeple to burn down and lynch all aerospace industry personnel because "NASA should have been able to warn us!"

      Maybe our descendants, 500 years after the Great Burn, will do better.

    2. Re:It seems like by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Simple, hire a bunch of oil rig hands and send them up into space after a few days training and give them lots of really high tech toys and let them try to drill a hole in the asteroid and drop a nuke into it.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    3. Re:It seems like by jafac · · Score: 2

      I dunno, I think that the airport security should have been able to prevent Sept 11, and I don't see a big hue and cry to lynch the metal detector jockeys and their bosses.

      I wonder why?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:It seems like by Darby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think that the airport security should have been able to prevent Sept 11, and I don't see a big hue and cry to lynch the metal detector jockeys and their bosses.

      Well, since the government knew about it beforehand they could have prevented it but chose not to. This is not conspiracy theory or speculation, since they warned many VIPs not to fly that day.

    5. Re:It seems like by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      It makes sense because:
      Equally applicable = not applicable at all, the exacty same degree of applicability which applies to missiles.
      It's funny because it makes fun of government organizations and their love of creating things which have no long term productive value but provide secure lifelong employment for many many useless people.
      This is not to imply that I believe any of those things are true of nasa, only to explain to you the previous posters comment, since you didn't get it.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    6. Re:It seems like by jafac · · Score: 2

      INS and Customs ARE getting some heat (some people are calling for the dismissal of the head of the INS) - not enough in my opinion.

      I always thought it was weird that they used to allow me to carry a pocket knife onto planes. It was obvious then, and it's sure obvious now that planes could be hijacked by a team of knife-weilding terrorists. As "unimaginalbe" and "unthinkable" as everyone says this incident was, I hope that a lot of people had imagined or thought about it before. Or am I just a genius? Probably not. I thought that it was a crime that they allowed people to carry knives onto planes before, and an example of gross negligence.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  5. Meteorites DO Screw Stuff Up by EricKrout.com · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...as is apparent at this site. The page includes a large table of data with a listing of meteorites that have hit man-made objects (or people/animals).

    PostScript, PDFs, Printing, Oh My!

    1. Re:Meteorites DO Screw Stuff Up by FFFish · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damn, can you imagine what a cow looks like after it's been hit by a meteorite? SPLAT!

      I'd probably pay to see that.

      Not that I have anything against cows, mind you.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  6. ELE by crumbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's great. Just wonderful. Our species keeps squabbling over the same pice of dirt for 5,000 years in the Mid-East and completely misses one of the top threats to humanity. We have the technology to give us some protection against this type of thing. Let us implement it since we apparently got a 2nd chance.

    1. Re:ELE by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

      We have the technology to give us some protection against this type of thing.

      Which technology is that, please?

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    2. Re:ELE by betis70 · · Score: 4, Funny
      >>We have the technology to give us some protection against this type of thing.

      Which technology is that, please?

      Britney's pontoons.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
  7. I love their artist's rendition by Macrobat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They say the asteroid is a little bigger than the Tunguska object, but they depict something that looks a little bit smaller than the moon. It's a file picture, though, because it's their conception of the asteroid that allegedly did the dinosaurs in. Still seems like something THAT big would be even more devastating.

    --
    "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
  8. Re:Calculations by PD · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The asteroid was spotted only after it passed us. If we knew the trajectory of the asteroid, then we would have been able to calculate that it would miss us. If the asteroid was going to hit us, then depending on how far out, they might be able to guess which ocean it would fall into, or which continent might get hit.

  9. Not even Bruce... by Wee · · Score: 2
    ...Willis could have saved us this time.

    Seriously, that picture they have with their story is hilarious. A chunk 70 meters in diameter would only make a crater 700 meters in diameter (give or take). So if one assumes that picture is correct, the Earth is about 5km in diameter. :-)

    But now that I'm thinking about it a smaller, closer piece like 2002 EM7 might make a good test for NEA destruction systems. It's coming back in 90 years, too...

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Not even Bruce... by curunir · · Score: 3, Funny

      2002 EM7 might make a good test for NEA destruction systems.

      I had no idea the National Endowment for the Arts had such systems.

      It's good to know that when scientists fail to protect our planet, we can always rely on the artists!

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    2. Re:Not even Bruce... by Veteran · · Score: 2

      Scaling off of the data in "The effects of Nuclear Weapons" I get a circle of total destruction with a radius of about 7 miles. Hiroshima had a circle of total destruction of about 1 mile radius. The number of people killed by the asteroid strike - given the same population density as Hiroshima would be about 2.5 million.

      The earth gets hit by a rock that size about every 120 years.

      We got hit by a 4 megaton blast in 1994 - the good news is that it went off over the pacific ocean where evidently nothing but the Air Force tracking satellites saw it.

    3. Re:Not even Bruce... by Skip666Kent · · Score: 2

      If only Bruce Lee were still alive. He could have unleashed the tiger on that ateroid's ass...

      --
      **>>BELCH
  10. I know what we need! by nigelthellama · · Score: 3, Informative
    It's too bad Scott Safran is dead. He'd be perfect at eliminating these pesky asteroids.

  11. Chances are still pretty slim. by smoondog · · Score: 2

    People use the moons orbit as a benchmark for closeness. This guy was 1.2 times distant the moons orbit. Remember, this is going to happen *a lot* and only a small fraction of the observations are really going to be worrisome. And besides, even if this rock did hit earth the probability that it would hit something important is small. Tsunami would be the biggest worry I think.

    -Sean

    1. Re:Chances are still pretty slim. by Phosphor3k · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just remember, every Asteroid is a potential "Britney killer", and should be viewed as such.

      I can't live without my Britney Spears.

    2. Re:Chances are still pretty slim. by isorox · · Score: 2

      Tsunami would be the biggest worry I think.

      Hits in the mid north atlantic, bye bye washington, boston, new york, florida (including our shuttle launch facilities) and the eastern seaborad of the us & canada, most of the carabiean, west coast of europe (lisbon, boudeaux, cornwall, maybe upto southampton, le harve and bristol), azores, canaries, north west africa and northen south america.

    3. Re:Chances are still pretty slim. by coyote-san · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The moon's orbit is used for a couple reasons, most noticably the "lensing" effect both the earth and moon have on close misses. Something that passes this closely is going to have its orbit affected by the gravitational attraction.

      As for the impact of the rock, we no longer have the luxury of only caring about the area immediately adjacent to the impact point. During the first Gulf War there was a brilliant flash seen by military satellites from an impact that exploded over the Pacific Ocean. Had circumstances been slightly different the flash would have been seen over the Persian Gulf or Middle East, and it's virtually certain that the flash would have been initially interpreted as a nuclear detonation. (Watching for such flashes is exactly why these satellites were launched.)

      If the error was not quickly determined -- and it could be very difficult with another Tunguska-level event where the *only* way to distinguish it from a nuke is the lack of radiation -- then the deaths from the subsequent "retaliation" could easily dwarf the deaths from the initial impact.

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    4. Re:Chances are still pretty slim. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Informative
      > Had circumstances been slightly different the flash would have been seen over the Persian Gulf or Middle East, and it's virtually certain that the flash would have been initially interpreted as a nuclear detonation. (Watching for such flashes is exactly why these satellites were launched.)

      The flashes from nuke detonations have certain characteristics that the flashes from asteroid/cometary fragment detonations don't.

      (That said, the nuke-detecting satellites are doing a good job of keeping track of upper-atmosphere flashes from asteroid/cometary fragments. To the extent that such data can be given to NASA folks, we're getting some good science out of these things.)

      Yes, a human observer on the ground may erroneously conclude they've been nuked, but any rational chain of command involving release of nuclear weapons will include verification that the supposed nuke really was a nuke and not an unfortunately-timed meteorite.

      (Unfortunately, convincing the other side's troops that we hadn't developed some sort of new superweapon might be another story. The less technologically-advanced the opponent, the more the risk that they'll be able to understand the evidence that it was just Really Bad Luck.)

      Thankfully, the odds of asteroid impact itself are pretty slim, and I'm much more worried about those odds - anywhere on the planet - than I am about the rock hitting the Wrong Place at the Wrong Time.

      (Also thankfully, the solution to both problems is the same - a bit more spent on gear to watch for rocks, and assloads more spent on R&D into cheap, heavy-lift capabilities so we have a hope in hell of deflecting them when/if we find one with our name on it. If we never find a rock with our name on it, we've got a heavy-lift capability to make space tourism, offworld solar power stations, and eventual colonization a reality. Win/win.)

    5. Re:Chances are still pretty slim. by jafac · · Score: 2

      Seeing as how a large percentage of the muslim population of the world believes that the WTC attack was either actually perpetrated by Mossad, or the CIA (or both) in conjunction with a secret airliner remote-control system, I think that if an asteroid flew out of the sky and killed a cow in rural Iraq, we'd be hard pressed to convince them that it was anything other than a failed nuclear attack by the US.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:Chances are still pretty slim. by sheetsda · · Score: 2
      Unfortunately, convincing the other side's troops that we hadn't developed some sort of new superweapon might be another story.

      You wouldn't try to convince them we hadn't developed a superweapon. Arguably, nukes are as big or bigger a psychological warfare weapon as they are a weapon of mass destruction.

    7. Re:Chances are still pretty slim. by Alsee · · Score: 2

      The less technologically-advanced the opponent, the more the risk that they'll be able to understand the evidence that it was just Really Bad Luck.

      I guess after all these years it couldn't do any harm to let the cat out of the bag. I was a member of a bomber crew during WWII, and I can tell you that our nukes at the time were pieces of crap. Oh, sure, they worked fine out in the desert. Try to load them on a plane and subject them to 2 hours of vibration and they were kaput. You'd get electonics and wiring rattling around lose in the casing. Totally toast.

      The Japs just had really rotten luck, they just didn't know any better, and we weren't about to explain it to them when they came running to surrender.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:Chances are still pretty slim. by jafac · · Score: 2

      Your points are all well taken, but if there are so many sources of evidence from different points, I just don't believe that the US Government is competent enough to fake that. I mean, these are the same people that brought us the Monica Lewinsky deal.

      Okay, we have airport security camera footage of the alleged perpetrators.
      We have ATM camera footage.
      We have INS documentation.
      We have witnesses at the various flight schools.
      We have the passenger lists from four airplanes from two different airlines with independent corroboration from the booking agency.
      We have cell phone calls from doomed airline passengers to various news agencies and private citizens.
      We have information from foreign intelligence agencies tracking meetings between the alleged perpetrators and known terror operatives and Taliban/Al Qaieda.
      We have planning paperwork on the attacks recovered from captured Al Qaida locations in Afghanistan.
      We have a video of OBL, making statements that sounded very much as if he was aware of the attack prior to it's occurance (of course, he could just have been talking trash).

      Any one, or even several of these bits of evidence can be faked. I find it much harder to believe that ALL of it was faked, even in the face of all the surrounding fishiness.

      I've read many of the conspiracy theories, and I compared that to eyewitness accounts I read as it was unfolding on September 11th, right here on Slashdot, and much of the information in the conspiracy theories just does not agree with what people who were (claiming to be) there, IN the buildings, posted on Slashdot. Did the CIA send a bunch of spooks orders to post false claims on Slashdot corroborating the media's account - and then hack into Slashdot deleting posts from the people who supposedly "saw explosives planted on the 40th floor" or "heard explosions all up and down the building prior to the collapse"?

      At that point, you're not rationally approaching this problem - you're rationalizing to try to prop up a shaky world view. And that's my point about the folks that believe the conspiracy theories, and my point that - people who believe that the US is evil, can do no right, and is trying to slaughter all the arabs so we can get at their oil, are going to believe whatever they want to believe no matter what evidence you present.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    9. Re:Chances are still pretty slim. by jafac · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah, I also forgot that we have Moussai, who was supposedly going to be on one of the flights, and there is ample evidence that he's involved, and we have intelligence sources from foreign countries placing him in the same cities on the same dates as some of the other alleged hijackers, plus Moussai attended the same Mosque as Richard Reid, who is guilty as sin, no question about it. His shoes stink enough to prove that.

      There are just too many independent sources that all fit together.

      Yes there are things that don't fit (like the slow response time of the USAF to this threat, the fact that Bush didn't respond to the attack immediately, yet kept talking to the kiddies 30 minutes after the first impact and knowledge that at least two other airlines were hijacked, plus the mobilization of US forces in the days prior, plus the reports of a crop-duster dusting civillians in Louisiana that was very quickly hushed-up); but none of this equates in my mind to a government conspiracy to commit this attack and pin it on the arabs. There's something fishy going on, but it's not THAT.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  12. Calculations by nucal · · Score: 5, Funny
    But don't tell the grandchildren to head to the hills just yet. The odds of a collision are currently 1 in 10 million and could become even more remote with more refined calculations.

    If we could just get the calculations more refined, then the asteroids will never hit us.

  13. The world could be a better place... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if governments would listen to scientists who are interested in preserving the human race, instead of businesses that are interested in enslaving it.

    1. Re:The world could be a better place... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Foolish teamhasnoi...don't you understand that the businesses have realized that they can't enslave us if we aren't here? Enslavement = preservation, and don't you forget it.

      This message was NOT brought to you by a member of the conspiracy...

    2. Re:The world could be a better place... by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 2
      if governments would listen to scientists who are interested in preserving the human race, instead of businesses that are interested in enslaving it.

      Yeah, that was the promise at the beginning of the Twentieth Century, that Science, with new improved Central Planning would rid of us of all this chaos and exploitation. Anybody remember how that turned out?


      Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.

  14. Re:Calculations by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you do the precise calculation, you find that it couldn't have hit, because it missed!

    Strange that ;-)

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  15. Oh god no!, NOT the earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is where I keep all my stuff....

    1. Re:Oh god no!, NOT the earth... by jgerman · · Score: 2

      Uh moderators, that should be funny, let me hit you with a clue stick. Tick references are ALWAYS +1 Funny ;)

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  16. Re:Calculations by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

    Wthout any more information, my guess it could have hit anywhere within ca. 50% of earth's surface. If it had been 288,000 (plus/minus a few thousand) miles closer.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  17. One of my favourite conspiracy theories by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Tunguska explosion was not caused by an asteroid.

    1) there was no crater
    2) noone has been able to find any asteroid materials in the area.
    3) plants in the area have been discovered to have mutated DNA.

    It is quite clear to me that the Tunguska explosion was caused by a miscalculated experiment of the great eccentric inventor Nicola Tesla.

    BTW the official theory is that the asteroid consisted of nothing but water, it flew down to close to the surface, and then it exploded. Thats as difficult to believe as the Tesla theory imo.

    1. Re:One of my favourite conspiracy theories by Alomex · · Score: 4, Informative

      From space.com:

      Almost no one lived near blast site, however, save a few hunters and trappers. No one studied the site until 1930. And while scientists have long presumed an asteroid or comet exploded just above the surface, no consensus has been reached. Some even suggested a miniature black hole did the work.

      The object seems to have approached Tunguska from the southeast at about 11 km per second (7 miles a second), the BBC reported.

      Why did the asteroid break apart in the air?

      "Possibly because the object was like asteroid Mathilde, which was photographed by the passing Near-Shoemaker space probe in 1997," researcher Luigi Foschini told the BBC. "Mathilde is a rubble pile with a density very close to that of water. This would mean it could explode and fragment in the atmosphere with only the shock wave reaching the ground."

      A scientific paper on the work will be published in an upcoming issue of Astronomy & Astrophysics.

      From bbc.co.uk:

      They analysed seismic records from several Siberian monitoring stations, which combined with data on the directions of flattened trees gives information about the object's trajectory. So far, over 60,000 fallen trees have been surveyed to determine the site of the blast wave.

      Over 60,000 fallen trees have been surveyed to determine the site of the blast wave

      "We performed a detailed analysis of all the available scientific literature, including unpublished eye-witness accounts that have never been translated from the Russian," said Dr Foschini. "This allowed us to calculate the orbit of the cosmic body that crashed."

      The object appears to have approached Tunguska from the southeast at about 11 km per second (7 miles a second). Using this data, the researchers were able to plot a series of possible orbits for the object.

      Of the 886 valid orbits that they calculated, over 80% of them were asteroid orbits with only a minority being orbits that are associated with comets.

    2. Re:One of my favourite conspiracy theories by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Everyone knows that the Philidelphia expieriment was based on tesla's theories of time portals and Giant magnetec lenses... That was nothing more than a test that the lense imploded causing a massive radiation explosion... We studied that in history along with the military tests in 2012 with magnetic propulsion of submarines that created the first 700mph underwater vehicle that makes interdimensional travel possible today.

      Oh wait, my professor told me to not say things like that when using this internet time portal... Shit... oh well being on slashdot noone will believe it anyways....

      CiaO!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:One of my favourite conspiracy theories by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

      wouldnt there be a creater?

    4. Re:One of my favourite conspiracy theories by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

      crater sorry ...

    5. Re:One of my favourite conspiracy theories by Alomex · · Score: 2

      How is GNU non-free speech-wise? Seems to me it's as free as any other speech in the US, or anywhere else that has copyright laws.

      Not even close. GNU forces you to make any modifications public. The freest-speech is public domain, which has no conditions on its (re)use.

      Now one can argue that there are good reasons for the viral license. However it is nevertheless paradoxical that the RMS mantra of Free Software with Free as in "free speech" and not as in "free beer" is reality the complete opposite.

      GNU software is gratis, but by no means fully unrestricted (freedom sense).

    6. Re:One of my favourite conspiracy theories by Fesh · · Score: 2

      As in "this event can only be described as 'An act of God...'"?

      But I wonder... Which god? And why was he stuck in the middle of a forest in Siberia?

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    7. Re:One of my favourite conspiracy theories by Cerlyn · · Score: 2

      Actually, I do, although its science fiction. Go read Callahan's Key by Spider Robinson; the entire book is based on the premise that Nicola Tesla is still alive today (read the book; I'm trying to keep the spoilers down). He built an "energy ray" that indeed did cause the Tunguska level event, and in said book the military is trying to recreate Tesla's ray for their own purposes. (Interestingly enough; Tesla in this book did not aim said ray at Tunguska; he had aimed it at the uninhabited Artic North, but screwed up on his calculations.)

      Spider Robinson himself is a very good, humourous author; the best thing you can do is go out and get the book to read it yourself. Callhan's Key is one of the later books in the Callhan series, but you should have no trouble starting from there.

    8. Re:One of my favourite conspiracy theories by NeMon'ess · · Score: 2
      Well since your user ID is only 12016 (bet that "16" pissed you off, eh?) you're either about six years old today, or you hijacked someones abandoned account. I'm guessing the latter since slashdot was hacked in 2006 and 50,000 user IDs and passwords got posted on kuro5hin.

  18. Thanks for picking on us, CNN... by Blackwulf · · Score: 3, Funny

    If it pierced the atmosphere, the approximately 70-meter-long rock could have disintegrated and unleashed the energy equivalent
    of a 4-megaton nuclear bomb, researchers said.

    "If it were over a populated area, like Atlanta, it would have basically flattened it," said Gareth Williams, associate director of the International Astronomical Union Minor Planet Center in Boston, Massachusetts.


    Thanks for telling me how dead I'd be if it hit here. Couldn't you have talked about it hitting somewhere where I don't live? Like Kabul, or something? Maybe Baghdad?

    1. Re:Thanks for picking on us, CNN... by curunir · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thanks for telling me how dead I'd be if it hit here. Couldn't you have talked about it hitting somewhere where I don't live? Like Kabul, or something? Maybe Baghdad?

      They were trying to get you to imagine what the devastation might have been like. Thanks to the presidents Bush, one does not need any imagination to envision what Kabul or Baghdad would look like.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    2. Re:Thanks for picking on us, CNN... by sharkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Couldn't you have talked about it hitting somewhere where I don't live? Like Kabul, or something? Maybe Baghdad?

      Or Redmond, Washington.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Thanks for picking on us, CNN... by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 5, Funny
      OK:
      "If it were over a populated area, like Baghdad, it would have basically flattened it," said Gareth Williams, associate director of the International Astronomical Union Minor Planet Center in Boston, Massachusetts, "but our calculations show that one fragment, about the size of a grapefruit, would hit Blackwulf square in the face, killing him instantly"

      Better?
      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    4. Re:Thanks for picking on us, CNN... by jheinen · · Score: 2

      Hey! Not everyone living here is affiliated with The Beast. Most, but not all.

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    5. Re:Thanks for picking on us, CNN... by praedor · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it sucks, but you have to break a few eggs...


      The cost-benefit analysis indicates that a Redmond strike would kill all 2 of the non-M$ lackey/employees while wiping out ALL the Redmonites. The equation definitely favors letting the strike happen.


      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    6. Re:Thanks for picking on us, CNN... by gnovos · · Score: 2

      If it pierced the atmosphere, the approximately 70-meter-long rock could have disintegrated and unleashed the energy equivalent
      of a 4-megaton nuclear bomb, researchers said.

      "If it were over a populated area, like Redmond, Washington, it would have basically flattened it," said Gareth Williams, associate director of the International Astronomical Union Minor Planet Center in Boston, Massachusetts, "and in the process, prove that there is a God and he does listen to the prayers of free sofware developers. This asteroid would, however, cause no damage were it to strike Hillary Rosen in her BMW. As everyone who's read the SSSCA knows, the RIAA is above the laws of physics."

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  19. Only thing a better monitoring system would do... by BrianGa · · Score: 2

    ..is tell us when we're all going to die.

  20. Not that hard to believe. by guamman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most likely, some equipment picked it up. The problem is that there are not enough people and computing power to monitor it all. With the exception of the seti@home experiment and other distributed computing projects, all the telescopes and observatories on earth can only monitor approximately 1% of the sky at any given time. When you take this into consideration, I'd bet that there have been several meteors that have gone unnoticed completely. In this case, Ignorance truly is bliss.

  21. Re:Calculations by laserjet · · Score: 4, Funny

    You, my friend, are management material! You will be promoted shortly. Well done.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  22. Whats the point? by red5 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the article

    Nonetheless, astronomers maintain that constant surveillance is necessary to identify more killer rocks in our neighborhood and ensure that none take our planet by surprise, in particular those traveling near the blinding light of the sun.
    What's the point if an asteroid is going to hit what are we going to do exactly?
    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
    1. Re:Whats the point? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

      Fool! Haven't you ever seen Armegeddon?!
      We fire Bruce Willis at it.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    2. Re:Whats the point? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 4, Funny
      What's the point if an asteroid is going to hit what are we going to do exactly?

      Soil your undies, perhaps?

    3. Re:Whats the point? by cperciva · · Score: 4, Funny

      if an asteroid is going to hit what are we going to do exactly?

      Evacuate Atlanta?

    4. Re:Whats the point? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      What's so difficult to understand?

      Let's take the example in the article:

      An asteroid will flatten the Atlanta-area.

      So let's assume you lifed there, what would you do?

      a) Wait for the asteroid to hit.
      b) Move somewhere else before it hits.

      A difficult decision, I know.

    5. Re: Whats the point? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


      > What's the point if an asteroid is going to hit what are we going to do exactly?

      Have you ever stopped consider how many times even a /.-reading g33k could get laid in three days, if everyone knew the world was going to end days hence?

      (I have to conclude that astronomer-geeks don't have any trouble getting laid, or else they would be letting out false alarms now and then.)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Whats the point? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The predicted impact location? You mean like "Earth"?

      How much data did they have for Skylab? For Mir? And the best they could do was, "Someplace wet -- we hope." I don't really think they're going to say, "Quick! Lean to the left and it'll miss you!"

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    7. Re: Whats the point? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Same as before, or maybe less. Look around you. Would you want the sight of a naked /.'er to be your last vision?

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    8. Re:Whats the point? by the+Atomic+Rabbit · · Score: 3, Informative

      That depends on the size of the asteroid. If it's big enough to end life on Earth, there obviously isn't much we can do to stop it. But if it's another Tunguska event, there is something we can do, i.e. don't go within a few hundred kilometres from the impact site.

    9. Re: Whats the point? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > Same as before, or maybe less. Look around you. Would you want the sight of a naked /.'er to be your last vision?

      Surely you didn't think I was talking about getting it on with other /.ers!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    10. Re:Whats the point? by red5 · · Score: 2

      Evacuate Atlanta?

      Good point exept. We don't know it's going to hit Atlanta all we know is that's it's going to hit Georgia.
      Mind telling me how you plan to evacuate Georgia in 48 hours?

      --
      I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
    11. Re:Whats the point? by cperciva · · Score: 2

      Mind telling me how you plan to evacuate Georgia in 48 hours?

      Well, hopefully we'd have more than 48 hours of warning.

      On the other hand, we could call it natural selection... survival of the-most-able-to-hijack-aircraft and all that.

    12. Re:Whats the point? by miracle69 · · Score: 2

      Mind telling me how you plan to evacuate Georgia in 48 hours?


      I believe they do that drill every year. It's called "The World's Largest Outdoor Cocktail Party"

      And those that don't leave will just be scattered about the state, which isn't that unusual, and we've already got a scapegoat

      --
      Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
    13. Re:Whats the point? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      The predicted impact location? You mean like "Earth"?

      How much data did they have for Skylab? For Mir? And the best they could do was, "Someplace wet -- we hope."


      Big difference. They were skimming the atmosphere. Kind of like skipping a rock across a pond and trying to guess where it will finally sink in. An asteroid would come straight in like a bullet.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    14. Re:Whats the point? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      if an asteroid is going to hit what are we going to do exactly?

      Evacuate Atlanta?


      Yeah, and schedule the Microsoft trial there that day.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    15. Re:Whats the point? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      I thought you were supposed to lie down or put a paper bag over your head or something..

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    16. Re:Whats the point? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      An asteroid would come straight in like a bullet.

      Why?

      Seems to me they pretty much go where they go and come from where they come, at whatever angle they happen to be. In fact, given the effect of Earth's gravity on a moving object, I'd think a curved, glancing trajectory rather more likely than a full-on dive toward Cleveland.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    17. Re:Whats the point? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      Absolutely. My point lay rather with the "projected impact site" concept. I have doubts that it would be much more than a hemisphere.

      Hell, when they predicted a water landing for Mir they were clearly playing the odds -- drop something anywhere in that hemisphere and it'll likely splash. It's like predicting a pavement impact if it falls in New York City.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    18. Re:Whats the point? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      I was going to give another analogy, but the details weren't close enough. I wound up explaining in excruciating detail exactly what happens. I didn't mean for it to get this long :)

      Separate the speed of each case into a horizontal speed it moves across the map and the vertical speed it falls.

      The asteroid is moving say 3000 MPH across the map, and coming down at say 3000 MPH. They measure the trajectory really well and figure it will hit the atmosphere within a 60 mile circle. It spends a few seconds in the atmosphere. Winds and stuff have no real effect. It goes in pretty much a straight line (or at least a predictable line).

      The satellite is moving 3000 MPH across the map. If there were no atmosphere it wouldn't come down - the vertical speed would be zero. There's almost no air 100 miles up, but there is a tiny bit. The wind drag slows it down by say 1 MPH each day. This causes to spiral a few hundred feet lower. After a few months it's down in thicker air and is dropping 1000 feet per day. A 2 weeks later it's dropping a mile per day. 2 days later it's dropping a mile her hour. 4 hours later it's dropping a mile per minute. A few minutes later it hits the ground.

      The problem is that it's going across the map at 3000 miles per hour. If you are off by 10 minutes that is 500 miles. The other problem is that the atmosphere expands and contracts based on random solar effects and weather. If the atmosphere expands by a mile the satellite falls faster - it acts like it's a mile lower and comes down a day or hour sooner. If the atmosphere contracts a mile it comes down a day or hour later.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    19. Re:Whats the point? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      I agree. Thing is, I would wager that the odds are that any given asteroid would, in fact, at least begin to orbit.

      Picture yourself as Joe Asteroid, bopping along through space at 2.7 zillion miles per. Over to your left there's a little blue marble. You feel strangely drawn towards it, and find yourself angling in its direction. Gradually your attraction increases, and your course becomes increasing curved toward this planet...

      My feeling is that only a few fast moving rocks that happen to be headed straight for us (unlikely -- space is big) and slow-moving objects with little lateral velocity are likely to be pulled towards us sharply enough to drop straight down. Anything fast will be most likely to come in at yes, a glancing angle.

      I'm guessing (based on figures that I pulled out of my ass) that's why there aren't very many killer asteroids -- most bounce off the atmosphere, or plow through the upper reaches and continue back into space, sadder and wiser chunks of rock.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    20. Re:Whats the point? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      The point is that an asteroid will never spend days or even minutes gently easing down into the atmosphere. The uncertainty in the satellites crash zone is caused miniscule atmospheric effects building up over hours and days.

      That's why they could say an asteroid will hit in or near Los Angeles, but they say a satellite is going to hit "somewhere in the pacific, we think. Or maybe western USA. That is, unless it comes down in China." You can predict the path of an object in the vacuum of space quite precisely. An object spending days in the edge of the atmosphere is like trying to predict the weather.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    21. Re:Whats the point? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
      I hate to repeat myself, but I guess I'm just not getting it: why shouldn't an asteroid skim the atmosphere? Isn't the most likely scenario something along the lines of a failed orbit, with the asteroid striking the top of the atmosphere at a shallow angle?

      I just don't see any special reason to assume that a typical object will be angled sharply, and more reason to guess a shallow approach (which I am arbitrarily defining as angle less than, say, 30 degrees, with 90 degrees being a straight vetical crash). I'm still thinking that most collisions will involve, not objects aimed at Earth, but objects headed near Earth and pulled closer by our gravity -- but for a fast-mover, that pull is going to result in a shallow angle of approach, so shallow, in fact, that many will not even hit, but rather slingshot around us and keep going. Those that do hit would, I would think, have plenty of chances to bounce, break up, buffet, bank, and otherwise behave in a chaotic and unpredictable (although aliterative) fashion.

      I'm also going based on a feeling that when I've seen meteor trails they've been long, which suggests to me transit through the upper atmosphere at a wide angle. I'm reasoning that if they tended to come straight down, then I'd see a dot, not a trail.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    22. Re:Whats the point? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      I'm just not getting it: why shouldn't an asteroid skim the atmosphere?

      Satellites spend months skimming the atmosphere. It's only during the last few days that any prediction on crash site is possible at all.

      It doesn't matter if an asteroid comes in on a shallow slope, it's never going to spend more than seconds in the atmosphere.

      It is the time spent in the unpredictable atmosphere that makes the difference. Even more importantly the effect is like compound-interest. A tiny difference at the start builds up to a huge difference over time. Days of "weather" affecting a satellite will change the crash site by thousands of miles. No matter woh well you measure the satellite, the weather is unpredictable.

      The atmosphere (the general unchanging aspect) will affect the asteroid in a predictable way. Seconds worth of weather is insignifigant to an object going 3 to 6 miles per second (ten to twenty tousand mph). As long as you measure it accurately enough you can predict the path.

      P.S.
      The earth's gravity has an almost insignifigant but completely predicable effect on something going 10-20 thousand mph.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  23. Hitting the moon by roberto0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless the rock was travelling at an enormous velocity, the moon would remain intact and any fragments sent into space from the impact would probably be burned up in Earth's atmosphere before colliding.

    If the rock were going fast enough and was coming in at the correct angle, it might have provided a fantastic show for telescope aficionados. (of course, Someone would have had to seen it coming!)

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, simulate.
  24. Re:Funding by laserjet · · Score: 2

    Not to be rude, you have a good point, but exaclty what is the solution to this problem? There really isn't anything we can do if a big asteroid hits us. In general, though, I do think NASA should have more funding, just not for this specific "problem"..

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  25. I Need My Meds Now by nickynicky9doors · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get the editors off the Crack and into detox... You're frickn scar'n me.

    Ice Shelf Collapses

    Resident Evil

    Child Porn

    Killer Asteroids

    --

    heuristic algorithm seeks stochastic relationship
  26. This is OLD news... by ghack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pulitzer prize winner Dave Barry[Miami Herald] commented on this a few weeks ago:

    Asteroid Nearly Destroys Earth

  27. Books for your reading pleasure by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This fine book is about this very thing happening (asteroid hitting earth). Lucifer's Hammer by Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle. (Both kick-ass authors) Another book by them, that is somewhat similar (aliens throwing the asteroids at us) is Footfall. Both are very good. If you don't have time to read 600 pages, here is a slightly shorter version.

  28. Tunguska? NOT! by tuxlove · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An impact by an asteroid of similar size to the Tunguska asteroid is not possible. Siberia was not hit by an asteroid in 1908 - it wasn't even "hit" technically. The destruction was caused by a comet.

    Hunters have looked for the remains of the asteroid that hit Siberia for years, but have found nothing, and for a very good reason. Simulations have shown that the blast pattern on the Siberian landscape could only have been caused by an object moving moving at a particular angle and exploding at elevation over the ground.

    Asteroids do not explode like that, but a comet would quite possibly. Made mostly of frozen liquid, the heat of atmospheric entry could cause a comet to explode as it rapidly vaporized. This would leave little or no large remains as an asteroid would, would probably not cause a crater, and would throw up less debris than an asteroid. All of this seems consistent with the Tunguska event.

    I'm no expert by any means, but if an asteroid of the same size as the Siberian comet hit the earth, my guess is that it would be much more destructive and have more worldwide effect.

    1. Re:Tunguska? NOT! by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      do you know what it takes to throughly search Tunguska? its mostly marsh. and trees.

      An astroid can explode in the atmosphere, depending on its "structual integrity".if its cracked a certian way, the pressure ot getsexposed to as it punched through our atmosphere.

      Im not saying it was or was not an astroid but,
      To say, "we have no evidence it was this one thing, so we're going to say its this other thing, which we don't have evidence of" is just bad science.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  29. And also in October- by purduephotog · · Score: 3, Informative

    MIT labs pointed out the miscalculation that there were MORE NEA objects than being reported.

    IT's on their lab page, which was included in my submission of the story. Basically, they've come to realize there is a hell of alot more junk floating around than they've thought about.

    Go figure- we haven't learned yet.

    2002-03-19 13:52:31 Another near miss: Asteroid buzzes earth (science,news) (rejected)

    1. Re:And also in October- by BlowCat · · Score: 3, Funny
      2002-03-19 13:52:31 Another near miss: Asteroid buzzes earth (science,news) (rejected)
      2004-08-01 15:00:12 Comet misses earth (science,news) (rejected)
      2005-01-12 01:51:02 Another stealth asteroid misses earth (science,news) (rejected)
      2007-12-23 23:33:58 Asteroid hits earth, wipes out civilization (science,news) (rejected)

      I still have no idea why the last story was rejected.

  30. Re:Calculations by rseuhs · · Score: 4, Informative
    which hemisphere/continent(s) would have been most likely to have been struck?

    This doesn't make sense.

    You have to make assumtions - for example change the path, speed and time when/where the asteroid had to be to hit earth. Where on earth it hits, depends on those assumtions and because there are millions of possible assumtions that lead to this result, you get millions of possible targets on earth.

    This is like asking what number would have hit a dart player who missed.

    since it's spring here now, and the asteroid is probably in the ecliptic.

    That would be summer. In spring any location is possible.

  31. Errrm, no... by kigrwik · · Score: 2

    Actually, that was Armageddon showing on TV.

    I almost ran to the basement myself, when I saw Bruce Willis with a NASA spacesuit....

    Hmm, never has my sig been more appropriate. Except, of course when that trawler caught a cow dropped from a russian cargo planel...

    --
    -- don't discount flying pigs until you have good air defense
  32. Tunguska Website by istartedi · · Score: 2

    The heat incinerated herds of reindeer and charred tens of thousands of evergreens across hundreds of square moles.

    I guess the comet/asteroid/whatever didn't bother to get permission from Greenpeace. Also, I bet those square moles were pissed. What did the cool moles do?

    In all seriousness, how long did it take the herds to recover? Probably not that long. This certainly should put all the arguments over Alaskan drilling into perspective.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  33. Wish by suso · · Score: 2

    Frankly, I wish one would hit the earth.

  34. I keep wanting one to hit my house.. by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

    No more mortgage! Woohoo!

    Unfortunately the chances of such a thing happening are about as slim as Slashdot having a pro-microsoft article, or a bill-gates tribute when/if he dies.

  35. Are these really near misses? by Performer+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK time for some back of the envelope math to counter the hysteria.

    461,000 kilometers was the distance it missed by. The projected target area of that circle is PI*R^2 or about 667 billion square kilometers.

    Radius of the Earth is around 6360 kilometers give or take. Projected target area of the Earth is therefore about 0.12 billion square kilometers. So the probability this class of object would collide with teh earth is roughly .12/667 or around 1/5600. Then IF it hit it would be more likely to do no damage than not depending on the impact zone.

    Of course they don't just count objects inside the 1.2X distance to the moon, range when they scream "near miss". Inside the moon, beyond the moon, they all count for the headlines.

    Excuse me for not losing any sleep.

    1. Re:Are these really near misses? by Performer+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      P.S. I know it's bad probability math to post facto take the range and use that in calculations, however, it is correct to say that the chance that any future object passing within that distance would have this probability of hitting gives some simplifying assumptions. The big assumption is that theere is an even poisson distribution of events in the circular target cross section. There may not be for reasons of orbital mechanics and the gravity of the Earth skewing the results. It seems to me that these would likely work to increase the probability of a strike, unless you consider that the Earth hoovering up rocks could skew results the other way, I think when you're this close with a near miss anyway the latter effect is negligable.

    2. Re:Are these really near misses? by epiphani · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Radius of the Earth is around 6360 kilometers give or take. Projected target area of the Earth is therefore about 0.12 billion square kilometers. So the probability this class of object would collide with teh earth is roughly .12/667 or around 1/5600.

      Sure, if space was flat. Think gravity.

      --
      .
    3. Re:Are these really near misses? by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      See my P.S. posted before your response, apart from the caveats I posted there it is entirely reasonable to consider the 2D cross section in these calculations.

    4. Re:Are these really near misses? by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, we also need to take time into account, or more specifically, the rate at which events such as this occur. If a once-in-a-million-years asteroid just missed Earth by a bit, then I'm not worried either. If a fifty-times-a-year asteroid just missed Earth, then I'm worried.

    5. Re:Are these really near misses? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      around 1/5600

      The and improved Chernobyl I-Pod, never needs batteries!
      Only a 1/5600 chance* it will detonate during use.

      * probability calculation based on typical use during one calendar year.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    6. Re:Are these really near misses? by mgblst · · Score: 2

      Excuse me for not losing any sleep. Your stats, and the fact that it passed by a few days ago.

    7. Re:Are these really near misses? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      The probability is significantly higher than your estimate. You have neglected to consider the effects of gravity on the shape of orbits. Also, if the orbit is perturbed during one pass, then there's a higher probability that it will come closer on another pass. So the effects are cumulative (though a lot more complex than I can figure).

      OTOH, an orbit perturbed by the Earth may then result in the orbit being perturbed by something else (the Sun or Jupiter, to pick the two heavies), in which case it may never again come as close.

      I think of them as near misses because if the earth - moon system perturbs their orbits, the effects are too complex to calculate, but increase the likelihood of another near pass. (And that was already pretty likely!) And the damage caused by a strike! Even if it didn't do hideous damage directly, it might set off a war (if you didn't see the meteor coming, who threw that missle? And are you going to wait for a couple of astronomers to get through security to find out that nobody did? When you might not believe them anyway?

      We need to see even the relatively minor ones, so that high tensions + accident don't lead to war. Among other reasons.
      .

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    8. Re:Are these really near misses? by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      Next time read the posts you reply to.

  36. Re:This is getting scary by Reid · · Score: 4, Funny

    His point, which you seem to have missed, is that there is clearly someone out there pelting us with rocks and garbage.

  37. asteroids by tGOw · · Score: 2, Funny

    omg, it's commin right for us!

    btw, i wanted to yell

    Post aborted
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    --
    -- LINUS TORVALDS, (cnn): Because their operating systems (Windows) really suck.
  38. Re:Only thing a better monitoring system would do. by rseuhs · · Score: 2
    Actually, with a good monitoring system you could (gasp) evacuate the affected area before it hits.

    Fortunately, most asteroids are not THAT big.

  39. Re:Only thing a better monitoring system would do. by JordanH · · Score: 2
    Imagine if something like this had hit near Washington DC without warning. We'd probably assume that the terrorists had a big boomer. We might have responded...

    Imagine if this hit in Pakistan or India? They might assume that it was the first salvo in a Regional nuclear war and responded in kind. Tens of Millions could be dead.

    Imagine if this hit in Israel...

    I could go on. Best that we know when and where it's going to hit, even if we don't have any defense yet.

    Better still to build up some sort of defense. I wouldn't think that a 70 Meter long rock would be that difficult to deal with. If we have sufficient warning, we might be able to alter the course of objects like these so they crash harmlessly on the Moon or into the Sun.

    Monitoring would be the first step. If we had a really good handle on the objects crossing our orbit, we could then develop some plans to handle the smaller ones, working up to more elaborate plans for the larger ones. For the really big ones, perhaps we could just nudge them a little every so often so as to either greatly decrease their chances of intersection with the Earth.

  40. Frequency by Nyarly · · Score: 2
    Is it just that they're getting reported more often, or is the frequency of asteroids near-missing the Earth increasing?

    While this sounds a little paranoid, there's a big difference between being able to see them better (or reporting them more loudly when we do) and them zipping by more often. The image I have is of some malign asteroid artillery unit ranging on the Earth, and the next (or the one after) will be the beginning of a barrage.

    I'm just being a worrying nellie, right? Right?

    --
    IP is just rude.
    Is there any torture so subl
  41. Torino Scale (used to classify collision threats) by volpone · · Score: 5, Informative
    If you're interested, check out nasa.gov's description of the Torino Scale , the method in which the scientific community classifies an object's likelihood of striking and damaging the Earth.

    The rating goes from zero (the object is certain to miss the Earth) to ten (the nasty asteroid thingy is definitely going to "cause a global climatic catastrophe"). Read it, it's very unsettling...

    Does anyone know what Torino rating this most recent near-miss was?

  42. Re:Is is really that close? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

    Imagine a bullet passing within two feet of my tiny little head. Is that close? Yup!

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  43. Re:Stealth Asteroid Misses Earth by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

    No. "Giant Stealth Asteroid Hits Earth And Nobody Notices Until 5 Days Later" - that would be a big headline ;-)

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  44. Came from the direction of the sun? by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
    The space boulder passed Earth within 288,000 miles (461,000 kilometers) -- or 1.2 times the distance to the moon -- on March 8, but since it came from the direction of the sun, scientists did not observe it until four days later.
    In other news, President Bush has declared the sun to be part of "the axis of evil."

    "My advisors have just informed me that the sun has been hurling dangerous, radiation death rays at the United States and its friends for millenia. And they have a 'solar flare' weapon they use to disrupt our electronics."

    "Mark my words. We will smoke them out of their holes and wipe them off the face of the planet," Bush stated, before a reporter pointed out that the sun is not on Earth. "It don't make no difference -- don't interrupt me with the politics of details, son. We're still going to hunt them down and put a stop to them."

    The president refused to answer questions about whether he plans to detain the sun in Cuba.

  45. Re:Tunguska Meteorite is nonsense by quantaman · · Score: 2

    Do you mean,
    Associating Tesla with the Tunguska event comes close to putting the inventor's power transmission idea in the same speculative category as ancient astronauts.

    The article is quite an interesting read although it kind of takes off and begins to sound like a mad scientist conspiracy theory after that point but they do raise some interesting points (or at least give some interesting history).

    --
    I stole this Sig
  46. We need a NEAR@HOME... by jhesse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm... A 12-inch SC telescope contained in a small roof-mounted dome with servos and a CCD hooked up to your computer. With a hundered of these, we should be able to get at least half of the sky.
    Something like this, only smaller: http://www.ll.mit.edu/LINEAR/

    Whaddaya think, sirs?

    --

    --
    "I have also mastered pomposity, even if I do say so myself." -Kryten
    1. Re:We need a NEAR@HOME... by AstroJetson · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good idea but a 12 inch SCT has a field of view on the order of 1 degree (probably somewhat less). We'd need thousands not a hundred to cover the sky. That number could be reduced somewhat by limiting the search to expected asteroid and comet orbits, but still....there would have to be lots of scopes to provide decent coverage. Even so, I think this is a great idea. Even 1% of the sky is better than 0%, right? And scope time on the big boys is way too expensive for a project like this.

      --
      Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
    2. Re:We need a NEAR@HOME... by jheinen · · Score: 2

      The scope doesn't just aim at one point in the sky. You can cover a whole swath in one night. Then repeat the next night and compare the images. This can all be done automatically, and in fact the hunt for minor planets is a growing hobby with amateur astronomers. GOTO computerized scopes and CCD imaging have made it possible to do real science in your backyard.

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
  47. "We're not going to see it" by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2

    "If one comes from the direction of the sun, we're not going to see it," Williams said.
    Uh, yeah, like everything's blinded by the sun, dude, including RADAR.

    Aren't you glad these guys are watching out for us?

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  48. What would have happened... by distributed.karma · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What happens if a big asteroid hits the Earth? Judging from realistic simulations involving a sledge hammer and a common laboratory frog, we can assume it will be pretty bad." -- Dave Barry

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  49. Hey! Atlanta? by phreakmonkey · · Score: 3, Funny
    From the article:
    "If it were over a populated area, like Atlanta, it would have basically flattened it," said Gareth Williams, associate director of the International Astronomical Union Minor Planet Center in Boston, Massachusetts.

    Why Atlanta, huh? You Bostonians have a problem with us or somethun?!?! Shee-it, I gots neighbors with pickup trucks bigger than that damned rock anyday. Bring it on, we'll haul it off for ya!

  50. Money by xX_sticky_Xx · · Score: 2

    Yesm it is safe to assume they didn't know about this one. The main obstacle to cataloguing NEOs is a lack of funding from institutions and governments.

    Ther are a lot of undetected NEOs out there and in order to have a chance at finding and plotting the orbits of most of them, governments are going to have to put resources into monitoring. This, of course, won't fly well with the "my tax dollars" whiners because they will only see it as a waste of money. I doubt they would see it that way if a 1km asteroid smacked the earth though ;).

    --

    ---

    I didn't want to leave this space blank.
  51. Australian Skies by skware · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aint it great how in 1996 the aussie government withdrew all funds from a asteroid mapping program.

    This pretty much leaves noone gaurding the southern skies.

    There was a story on this on 60 minutes (aussie version) 3 days ago. A transcript of it can be found at http://news.ninemsn.com.au/sixtyminutes/stories/20 02_03_17/story_531.asp

  52. Some Perspective by Militant+Apathy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1.2 Lunar diameters is not the relevant number here. 288,000 miles is 72 Earth radii.

    That means that if you draw a circle around the Earth with a radius at the distance of closest approach, the Earth's cross-sectional area fits into that circle 5,200 times.

    In other words, even if someone were heaving rocks at us at distances this close or closer at a rate of one per year (a grotesque overestimate), we would expect to get hit once every five millenia or so, neglecting gravitational attraction effects (which don't contribute much).

    As "near misses" go, that's not so near. The Earth isn't that big a target. This is a nice frothy story for CNN, especially the "blind side" angle, but not a great reason to start repenting sins.

    --

    GNU Info is documentation optimized for machine readability
  53. Re:This is too weird. by Tattva · · Score: 2
    been listening to the audio book version of Niven & Pournelle's "Lucifer's Hammer"

    I remember reading that book years ago. One quote from the book has stuck with me all that time: They are up in the shuttle observing the comet, with all the microcomets and debris shining in the sun, and one of the astronauts says, "Duck's-eye view of a shotgun blast."

    Gotta love it. Good book if you want to see some honest speculation about what a civilization-ending hit might do to the world. As a bonus, it's the only book I've read that makes a nuclear power plant a protagonist (IMO.)

    --
    personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
  54. Can't really blame the scientists by LrdZombie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, to be fair to the scientists, all their mothers told them not to stare at the sun, so can we really blame them for not seeing it?

  55. Re:Blindspot??? by Tattva · · Score: 2
    Well you can't point a telescope towards the sun and expect to see something!

    I suspect it is a blind spot not because of the atmospheric effect (we do have Hubble in orbit, and masking for terrestrial telescopes, after all, and if it were directly in line then we would see its profile as a dark spot on the sun) but because if an object is (nearly) between the observer and the light source, only a tiny portion of its surface would be illuminated from the perspective of the observer.

    --
    personal attacks hurt, especially when deserved
  56. Re:Stealth Asteroid Misses Earth by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

    Maybe if it hit somewhere that nobody would miss.... Belgium perhaps?

  57. Re:Does it really matter? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

    We have a lot of blind spots... asteroids aren't luminous - we only notice them when they're illuminated by the sun, by which time they're pretty damned close.

    It's quite possible if something a couple of miles across was heading towards us we wouldn't see it until it was too late anyway.

  58. no scientific training??? by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    I am pretty certain that tesla studied physics or engineering in austria (i may be wrong about the country). thats where he invented his electric motor.

    By the way he never hoped to get energy out of nothing. He was trying to put energy in an resonating EM wave inside the earth, and get it back from the earth's surface.

    Tesla was a genius understood or not. Electricity as we know it and use it today is based on two tesla inventions - the modern electrical motor which is used to make all electricity (with minor exceptions) and for most moving electrical things; the second one was communication by em waves (radio).

    1. Re:no scientific training??? by xtal · · Score: 2

      Tesla was Hungarian. He was a brilliant student. Read some books on his life. You have to remember electricity was not understood the way it is now in Tesla's day - he visualized in his head what the waves did, how the electric and magnetic fields interacted. There WAS no formal training in electricity! People thought that an AC motor was impossible - Tesla INVENTED that. The man was a brilliant genius, and largely understood. He is amoung the few engineers to have a unit named after him, the Tesla (Magnetic Field Intensity, equal to 10k Gauss IIRC).

      Unlike Edison, Tesla actually had a clue about the physics of what he was doing. He was also doing some experiments on the MegaWatt (IIRC) level in New York at that point in time. For you "pull energy out of air" people, that's what a radio does. He is also on record as saying that a free source of energy would probably be a very, very bad thing for the future of man. I forget the exact quote.

      --
      ..don't panic
  59. Re:Calculations by Tosta+Dojen · · Score: 5, Funny
    This is like asking what number would have hit a dart player who missed.

    I dunno... I once saw an 8 come down off the board and start beating the crap out of a dart player who missed his shot entirely. The dude was slightly drunk, too, so the 8 was really trashing him before the rest of us got them apart. Of course, the 17 is pretty irritable too -- I wouldn't be surprised if one of them ever gave somebody a smack in the head.

    --

    I have a strong belief in the Second Amendment.

  60. Re:Umm, no by Alexis+Morissette · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, if we can't see it because of the sun's light, why don't we just look for it at NIGHT? Duuuuuh...

    --
    This is a special excite .sig
    This
  61. Re:Umm, no by Fesh · · Score: 2

    Because there's an assload of planet between your telescope and the object you're looking for?

    Duuuuuh...

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  62. "Stealth Asteroid Misses Earth Entirely... by MattGWU · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Air Force Cancels Project"

    In a news confrence today top US Air Force brass announced the cancellation of Project Stealth Space Rock o' Death, when the initial test of the ten year, $100 billion project failed.

    "We are very dissapointed with the recent failure", an unnamed scientist told reporters today at a press confrence held at an Arlington, Virginia-area Denny's, "the damn thing just missed...it was kind of a one-shot deal, you know? We're all pretty bummed around the office."

    The Stealth Asteroid was to capitalize on the success of the Stealth Bomber. "After the Gulf War, we were trying to figure out what other stealth things we could build. We were kicking stuff around the table, and somebody, I think Steve said stealth asteroid. I don't know if he was kidding or what, but we went ahead with it." The Stealth Asteroid was to be a weapon similar in theory to the Stealth Bomber, but different in a number of key areas. "First of all...it's not a plane. That's a big difference right there. Second, it would show up on the enemy radar at some point. Kind of a moot point, I guess...what would they do? Shoot at it? Maybe open an umbrella like in the cartoons. They'd be pretty boned......suckers."

    While nothing is being admitted, it was widely believed that the first test of this new weapons platform would also be its first use in combat, especially against targets in reinforced bunkers, buildings, yurts, or anywhere within a 15-mile radius of the impact zone.

    In other news, the Pentagon has announced the beginning of "Project Stealth Solar Super-flare".

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
  63. Re:Torino Scale (used to classify collision threat by adminispheroid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes. Zero.

  64. Re:Don't worry, be happy by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2

    Blue Archon writes:

    > Why are everybody worried about these asteroids? The last asteroid
    > big enough to kill people so it counts hit earth something like 65
    > million years ago... Those smaller asteroids keep dropping down a bit
    > more often, but who cares? If it don't hit a major city (very unlikely,
    > compared to the unihabited part of earth) it won't do anything...

    65 million years ago? How about less than six thousand? Current theories have an asteroid or comet smashing into Iraq and destroying several bronze age cultures (http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planetearth /comet_bronzeage_011113-1.html). If the event in Siberia had happened in a heavily populated area, you bet people would have been killed. As recently as 1994 a comet broke apart and hit a planet (in this case Jupiter), causing multiple impacts. You could fit the entire planet Earth into some of the dents (since healed because Jupiter is a gas planet and cloud craters aren't as long lived as ones in rock). In fact last July a small asteroid (smaller than a car) hit a corn field in Pennsylvania. Supposedly it made popcorn. ;)

    > Oh yeah.. a few thounsand people might get killed, but doesn't people
    > die in larger quantities in wars and stuff like that?

    Oh, show some compassion! Most of the Earth is water, drop a big enough asteroid in the water and Mr. Tsunami will come calling, with a huge wall of water that can be quite devastating. If the asteroid hits on land, and is in the nuclear range of impact, you are going to get a nice little nuclear winter, sans radiation. You get drought, dark days, cold nights, and all that dirt in the sky has to go somewhere. The one that killed the dinos 65 million years ago killed 70% of the life on this planet along with them (and guess what, those kind of asteroids come around about once every 100 million years).

    We've had five major mass extinctions (including the most recent one involving the dinos), but 251 million years ago the granddaddy of them all, the Permian Extinction, wiped out 90% of all life on this planet. It may well have been caused by an asteroid or comet (http://www.cosmiverse.com/space08300105.html).

    The time to think about what to do to protect ourselves (if we even can) is not four days before an asteroid is due to hit, and certainly not four days after. That time is now. Of course, it is also high time to put an end to war and terrorism.

    "Lola, kindness is not enough, look for the reason of hatred and anger. When you find and understand that, love becomes the strongest power; stronger than courage or wisdom."
    Belabera, "Mothra 3: King Ghidora Attacks"

  65. Dudes What about the Moon? by kanada · · Score: 2

    The article said the meteor was 1.2 time the distance from the earth as the moon. I wonder what'd happen if a meteor hit the moon.
    Now That'd Be Interesting.

  66. Re:Calculations by rseuhs · · Score: 2
    Why would you have to make any assumptions?

    Because obviously the thing did not hit us.

    Imagine a dartplayer missing the dartdisc - how are you going to answer where would he hit it when he would have hit it?

  67. Re:Calculations by rseuhs · · Score: 2
    /me rolls eyes

    The asterioid probably didn't cross the earth's path exactly, so you got to reset it. Question is where? Do you put it exactly on the path to get a possible hit at the equator region? Or the northern or southern hemisphere?

  68. Re:Actually... Whats a Metric Unit? by dylan_- · · Score: 2

    Read this.

    Don't post when you don't know what you're talking about. You could at least have read the article before you started with your "horrible YEC creationists" rubbish.

    --
    Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
  69. Sorry guys but it doesn't sound like him by nusuth · · Score: 2

    You see, the sun really has powerful nuclear capability and solar flare thing that disrupts electronics, that is not Bush like at all.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  70. Re:Armageddon by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Bruce Willis is too chicken to fly in an aeroplane, if you threatened to send him in a shuttle he'd probably shit himself!

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  71. Re:Calculations by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

    One question: Could someone clarify what exactly you mean by "in the ecliptic?" Unless you are assuming a source of asteroids which has a period related to Earth's I cannot see any reason that one hemisphere would be prefered over the other even when there is a source(with period unrelated to Earth's) of asteroids.

    I assume that by "in the ecliptic", he meant that it was inside the Earth's orbit (i.e. closer to the sun).

    The ecliptic is the projection of the Earth's orbital plane onto the sky. It is also the path that the Sun appears to follow across the sky over the course of a year. The parent poster's reference to the ecliptic doesn't make much sense. It's true that most solar system bodies lie near the ecliptic, because the solar system is relatively flat. However, the Earth is tiny compared to the size of the solar system; the asteroid could have hit either pole on any day of the year and still be considered near the ecliptic plane.

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  72. Re:Is is really that close? by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
    But maybe you're just not a micro-encephalic like me. :)

    Seriously, though, even 10 meters is closer than most of us have had a bullet go by, and a hell of a lot closer than we'd like. Even though I live in Baltimore, I put down the paper when I hear even a distant shot. It's not so much the distance as it is the consequences, rather like the fact that a sidewalk feels perfectly safe, but most of us wouldn't use a bridge across the Grand Canyon if it were only three feet wide, with no rails.

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  73. Re:Tesla was a crackpot by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    You seem to have been misinformed. I don't care how badass a resistor you think you are, 2 amps will stop your heart.
    It won't fry you in a spectacular fashion the way say... licking a powerline would, But you'll be just as dead.

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  74. he wasnt hungarian by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    he was a Serb.

  75. There is a problem with simulations like that by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    The problem is that they already know the answer when making the simulation.

    Simulations can only be based on certain assumptions about the way things work in the world. Once you already have the answer you can easily mold the assumtions in a way that neatly fits the answer.

    The explosion may have been caused by a comet but i dont consider those simulations really convincing proof.

  76. Re:Tesla was a crackpot by spike+hay · · Score: 2

    Yeah. The capicitor used in this laser is designed for ultra-fast discharges. Less than a millionth of a second.

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  77. Re:Tesla was a crackpot by spike+hay · · Score: 2

    15,000 volts with some amperage is very deadly. It would definitely kill you or at least cause cardiac arrest. Any high-voltage electricity (except static, like from a Van De Graff generator) can kill you.

    Do you know that if you take apart a disposable camera you can kill yourself with the flash bulb capacitor if it isn't drained? It doesn't take much power. That means, when properly transformed to a high voltage, you can kill yourself with the electricity from a AA battery!

    I don't care how good a resistor you are 15,000 volts is a lot. Volts is more a measure of the resistance the electricity can take. 110 volts can jump through your body just fine, as I have found out. 15,000 volts would go through your body 100 times easier.

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.