Slashdot Mirror


Most Outrageous Vendor Lie Ever Told?

i8msft writes "CIO published a guide on How To Cut Through Vendor Hype. While light, the article did prompt me to wonder what is the most outrageous lie ever told by a vendor? I mean, in person, face to face, preferably with witnesses (boss, coworkers, someone on your side of the fence). Forget press releases, trade show presentations and the like, where they lie like dogs! Specific examples only, please."

388 of 1,278 comments (clear)

  1. My Vote: by JoeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Duke Nukem will be out by the end of the year. No, we promise. Not lying this time!"

    JoeLinux

    1. Re:My Vote: by gazbo · · Score: 5, Funny
      No, the biggest lie I've ever been sold is anything of the form
      Slashdotted, here is a mirror
    2. Re:My Vote: by coolgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'll never get an "Unrecoverable Application Error" in Windows 95.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    3. Re:My Vote: by connorbd · · Score: 2

      I know someone who bought one of those. It was a P2/450, an IBM with an LPX mobo. It wasn't really a bad computer at all; IMHO he only overpaid to the tune of $100 for it. It did need a new CD-ROM, though.

      /Brian

  2. One Word... by Moonshadow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Daikatana.

  3. Mandrake by athakur999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mandrake, regarding the Mandrake Club:

    "All membership levels enjoy the same benefits."

    Now it's "almost the same benefits".

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    1. Re:Mandrake by unitron · · Score: 2
      "This comes right after a big drive by them to get donanations."

      I think they call that particular technique "The PBS".

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  4. We make a secure Operating System by microbob · · Score: 2, Funny

    We make a secure Operating System
    - Microsoft

    1. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Windows is more secure than Linux"

      Microsoft after IIS hack allows hackers to post porn on my employer's web site.

    2. Re:We make a secure Operating System by xmedar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thats pitiful, I remember a former company I worked for spending many many thousands on being a member of MSDN so we could get access to "All the latest info", and surprise! When we needed docs for all those undocumented APIs, they told us to buy a source code licence, forgeting that they had already told us we would have access to the info we wanted through MSDN, they wanted an extra $500K if I recall, and I know of others this happened to, but somehow I can't see a line-item on any M$ accounts that says "Fraud"

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced man is indistinguishable from God
    3. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Ruliz+Galaxor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hmmz... this remembers me of Oracle saying that it was impossible to hack them. Yeah, gimme a break, after two weeks 4-8 bugs detected.

    4. Re:We make a secure Operating System by WildBeast · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can say it's a bug, for me it's a feature :)

    5. Re:We make a secure Operating System by arkanes · · Score: 2

      I'd have to say the Oracle 91 website on the oracle website is the biggest - ran across it the other day looking for oracle 8i documentation - and they claim, in writing, that the oracle database can survive total physical failure of the server it's running on! Now, after thinking about it for a second, they probably mean that it can prevent data corruption and loss, but the way it's worded certainly makes it sound like Oracle is some magic application that can stay up even when it's hardware is destroyed. They also claim that it can't be broken by user error.

    6. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Why is it 99% of people who dis MS never actually code/develop programs anyways?

      Because BSODs don't magically go away when us non-coders sit down to use Windows, dimwit.

    7. Re:We make a secure Operating System by barnaby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Listen here newbie.

      When I fix something I expect it to _stay_ fixed. But since you had to reinstall NT from scratch every now and then, all my hard work at patching the OS goes down the toilet. So I have to decide between loading the service packs in the right order (if your running IIS) and then loading the hotfixes or getting some sleep.

      It's a really shitty product that blames all its problems on its customers.

      Don't get me started on this particular piece of FUD from M$. Next you'll be telling me all 3rd party drivers are buggy and security by obscurity is correct, and my network will just work right when we finally go all M$ and wait of course.. the fix for you're current problem is in the next version, and yes we really did need to break the doc, xls, vsd file standards in order for you to pay us more fscking money next year....

      Get a fucking clue, you're being lied to by M$ and you believe it.

      --
      Barnaby
    8. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Oh hell, 3 weeks ago I found out that was most definitely not the case. Thank goodness for a recent hot backup.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    9. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Nintendork · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This arguement had nothing to do with FUD. If you listen to what you're saying, nothing is backed up by fact and you're spreading FUD about MS. Hypocrite. Maybe if you spent as much time on NT as you do on open source OSes, you wouldn't screw up your windows boxes and have to reinstall every once in a while. And where do you get off on calling me a newbie? I've been reading slashdot for ~4 years now which in my mind doesn't make me a newbie (Or a veteran for that matter). I hate MS business practices and think they are blowing smoke when they say that they're focusing more on security, but I don't blame them for admin incompetence. And when has MS blamed the users? Usually, they suck up the bad press and try to help their customers. When Nimda hit and compromised systems that never installed old patches, they offered free support! They tried to educate users on keeping up to date. And who the heck modded you insightful? All you spewed out was typical anti MS FUD that I see made on Slashdot by biased people. You don't like MS and don't like their products. Fine. Nothing justifies making claims that you can't back up.

    10. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      Funny thing is, we also shelled out the big buck$ for the MSDN Universal.

      I, too, needed access to undocumented interfaces (specifically Card&Socket Services in NT4SP3).

      The MSDN tech support guy sent me sample code, after making me swear up and down (and probably promising him my first-born -- I don't remember) that I wouldn't use it on anything EXCEPT NT4SP3.

      The code worked, no muss, no fuss, and (amazingly) no NDA (though we treated it as "Company Confidential" info).

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    11. Re:We make a secure Operating System by Glytch · · Score: 2

      I've hung Linux before [try using full screen DGA apps at the same time as TV stuff...] so don't go telling me that Linux is all that.

      When in my post did I ever say anything about Linux? Please stop setting up strawman arguments.

    12. Re:We make a secure Operating System by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      Also from his site...
      Yeah you heard right I am pro-MS. Why? Because nobody else is.
      Wow.

      Oh my. Tom, you are a kindered spirit.

      I'm pro-cancer. Yup, you read it right. Every one else, including medical researchers and Ph.D.s, thinks cancer is a bad thing, so I felt badly for it and decided that I'd be pro-cancer, because nobody else is.

      [sigh] Simpleton.

      Tom is the kind of kid that you get when you raise your children in a city (Kanata) that dictates the color you can paint your house ("Earth tones only, please!"). He's deathly afraid of not conforming.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  5. Cigarettes by papasui · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    "Cigarettes don't kill people."

    1. Re:Cigarettes by kisrael · · Score: 2

      (-1, Offtopic...and I don't really want to get intoa big debate, but...)

      "They say that 'guns don't kill people, people kill people'...well I think the gun helps...If you just stood there and yelled BANG, I don't think you'd kill too many people."
      --Eddie Izzard

      Or, as someone else put it...every society has some loose screws running around. The trouble is in the USA, there rather more likely to be able to get some guns.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:Cigarettes by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      True enough, but say I have a gun sitting on a table. It's not going to jump up and start mowing down people.

    3. Re:Cigarettes by smagruder · · Score: 2

      Guns don't kill people, but they sure make it easy to kill a lot of 'em, and fast!

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    4. Re:Cigarettes by Phork · · Score: 2

      guns do kill people, bullets kill people.

      --
      -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
    5. Re:Cigarettes by SCHecklerX · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh great. We got a 'truth' person on slashdot. Couldn't you guys have come up with a better use for the money?

    6. Re:Cigarettes by moebius_4d · · Score: 2

      > "They say that 'guns don't kill people, people kill people'...well I think the gun helps...If you just stood there and yelled BANG, I don't think you'd kill too many people."
      >--Eddie Izzard

      If you want to make decisions about political questions that touch on the sovereignty of the individual and the balance between that and the good of the community based on a joke by a grade-B homosexual transvestite commedian, be my guest. I prefer to rely on actual statisitical studies of the effects of various choices together with an analysis of the ethics involved in those choices.

      >every society has some loose screws running around. The trouble is in the USA, there rather more likely to be able to get some guns.

      It's "they're." The question is what happens in places where its illegal to have guns and a "loose screw" gets one and starts to go to it, vs. places where people can legally carry. And the answer is, where people can legally carry they stop the "loose screw" before he does much damage. Not to mention the fact that fewer people try to commit violent crimes in places where the victim pool can arm themselves legally.

      I realize that my comment isn't funny, but perhaps you would be better served by using it as a starting point then Eddie Izzard or Bart Simpson.

    7. Re:Cigarettes by dagoalieman · · Score: 2

      I sure as hell did not mean to start a flamewar here, nor to be offtopic..

      Jeesh.

      Yes, bullets are the items that come from guns and cause the physical damage. Yes, a gun is a utility, or co-effectant in the death of people. No, I'm not saying that people shouldn't have gun rights- I believe quite the opposite, although I have no wish to own a gun myself.

      And I know that ciggarettes cause physical issues. I was merely saying that somewhere behind 99% of gun/tobacco related deaths were a brain, inhaling the intoxicants, or pulling the trigger. There are accidental deaths, but 90% of those could have been prevented using a little common sense with guns (point the damn thing in the air if not targeting something!! Unload before cleaning it, and test-shoot out any possible loaded ammunition. Sounds stupid, huh? I've had friends die that way. Not by me though, thank the Lord.)

      Neither the gun nor the ciggarette jumps up and says "Damnit, I wanna kill someone!" and goes out to harm someone. However, somewhere, a person with a brain uses them in their respective deadly manners, causing death.

      Sorry to offend anyone. I know you can nitpick this argument all you want. I'm not trying to flamebait or troll, but I fear there's no way to avoid it on this topic. And it's offtopic.

      At any rate, appologies to all I offended.

      (Oh, and by the way, our gun range targets are not people shadows. They are skeet/clay pigeons. We rednecks do indeed use guns for something other than people. Usually.)

      --
      We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
    8. Re:Cigarettes by OWJones · · Score: 2

      If you want to make decisions about political questions that touch on the sovereignty of the individual and the balance between that and the good of the community based on a joke by a grade-B homosexual transvestite commedian, be my guest.

      And, of course, making personal attacks on the voice of an idea completely discredits the idea itself. Good show.

      I prefer to rely on actual statisitical studies of the effects of various choices together with an analysis of the ethics involved in those choices.

      I will, however, have to agree with you here. Sooooo ....

      It's "they're." The question is what happens in places where its illegal to have guns and a "loose screw" gets one and starts to go to it, vs. places where people can legally carry. And the answer is, where people can legally carry they stop the "loose screw" before he does much damage. Not to mention the fact that fewer people try to commit violent crimes in places where the victim pool can arm themselves legally.

      After all that I'm still waiting for a solid statistic or citation. As a starting place, try this page at the Violence Policy Center, that actually cites research into gun violence. (Hint: they disagree with your "facts".)

      I realize that my comment isn't funny, but perhaps you would be better served by using it as a starting point then Eddie Izzard or Bart Simpson.

      How so? You a) failed to provide any statistics about an issue on which you took a high moral and ethical ground, b) demonstrated your own egotism about said issue and debating techniques, and c) failed to be even remotely entertaining.

      Bzzzzzt! Sorry, try again.

      -jdm

  6. The Biggest Lie by RobertTaylor · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Easy self assemble...."

    1. Re:The Biggest Lie by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Funny
      how about the obvious:

      "News for Nerds, Stuff that matters."

      (I'll take my beating in private)

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  7. best lie by imsirovic5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "This new Athlon XP 2100+ with 512 megs of ram 160 GIG HD, G-force 4, DVD rewritable will help you get laid!" It was a cruel lie! I will never believe salesman again ;o(

    1. Re:best lie by phalse+phace · · Score: 5, Funny
      "This new Athlon XP 2100+ with 512 megs of ram 160 GIG HD, G-force 4, DVD rewritable will help you get laid!"

      You mean you didn't get that hint? You fool, you could've had him. He wanted you,... BAD!

    2. Re:best lie by ColaMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      well, you didn't get *laid* exactly - but in the end you did get *screwed*

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    3. Re:best lie by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Mine got me laid.. um really, take it from someone who SELLS them! An AMD haxor 'puter WILL GET YOU LAID. You will be so leet!

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    4. Re:best lie by M@T · · Score: 2

      This new Athlon XP 2100+ with 512 megs of ram 160 GIG HD, G-force 4, DVD rewritable will help you get laid!" It was a cruel lie! I will never believe salesman again

      Obviously you've messed with the configuration...
      It should definitely work out of the box.

      --
      'sapientia potestas est'
    5. Re:best lie by epsalon · · Score: 3, Funny

      "This new Athlon XP 2100+ with 512 megs of ram 160 GIG HD, G-force 4, DVD rewritable will help you get laid*!"

      _______
      * Only applies if you are female.

    6. Re:best lie by unitron · · Score: 2
      "It should definitely work out of the box."

      Yeah, but he was looking to work *inside* the box.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  8. Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft Works

    I know it's overused, but hey it's valid.

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    1. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by NickFusion · · Score: 5, Funny

      And Microsoft Office! As it turns out, it's not an office at all, but merely some software.

      And now I have no idea where I'm going to put all these office chairs.

      --
      What were you expecting?
    2. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by reemul · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wasn't there a joke about MS thinking about selling office furniture? Something about a beta tester signing up because he was used to getting shrink wrapped stool samples from Microsoft anyway? Mebbe I'm forgetting...

      --
      You're just jealous 'cuz the voices talk to *me*
    3. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by laserjet · · Score: 2

      man, the worst thing I could imagine is getting samples of stool from microsoft...

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    4. Re:Blatant Lie In the Product Name itself by Reziac · · Score: 2

      [examining stool samples from Micro$oft]

      Roundworms, hookworms, tapeworms, whipworms, flukes, coccidia, giardia,...

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  9. We had a sales man from ... by crovira · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wang Mini Computer Systems sell a top of the l;ive 2200 system and neglect to tell the guy he sold it to, a drug store owner, that it had to be programmed.

    The guy took it, put in a wood shed out behing his little counrtyu drugstore and left it there for a couple of years until it finally got reposessed and made its way to our software firm where we were programming Wang 2200 machine (in BASIC. :-)

    I met that salesman and he was an absolute sleaze.

    Talk about selling a pig in a poke.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:We had a sales man from ... by Magila · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know if I could ever trust a company with the word "Wang" in it's name.

    2. Re:We had a sales man from ... by doorbot.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds as bad as one of my clients home machines, which, until recently, was a dual Pentium II machine running Windows 98. I don't know who sold it to him but it's good for a laugh around the office.

    3. Re:We had a sales man from ... by mickwd · · Score: 2

      Especially not their infamous German office - Wang, Cologne.

    4. Re:We had a sales man from ... by mickwd · · Score: 3, Funny

      And while I'm at it, proof that Siemens really does have a Staines office (search down about half-way).

    5. Re:We had a sales man from ... by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      It sounds like it's an old computer, and so it quite simply needed to be programmed. As in, it didn't have any software on it that would help the drug store guy with his job, and it's not like you could just hook it up to the Internet and download stuff.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    6. Re:We had a sales man from ... by biobogonics · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know if I could ever trust a company with the word "Wang" in it's name.

      I won't forget the day the Madison Wisc. "Isthmus" ran a picture of a sign at the local Holiday Inn reading "Welcome Wang Users".

      [The "Ursula Understands" column accompanying the picture fielded several hardware and software questions, and was priceless.]

      Apparently in Australia they had more trouble with their slogan "Wang Cares".

      As for vaporware, the system was supposed to be secure, but somehow one of the secretaries at university hospital pushed the wrong button and dumped a report of the salaries of the top thoracic surgeons. My that was an interesting day!

    7. Re:We had a sales man from ... by dalutong · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was really confused for a while before I realized that, at least in America, "Wang" is said Wuh-ang... not Wuh-ah-ng... as it is said (at least) in China...

      Then again, i know nothing about the company... but wang, the chinese way, can mean good things (depending on tone, it can mean things like king)

      i guess that is one of those culture shock bits...

      --

      What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    8. Re:We had a sales man from ... by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

      The joke at the time was, "Stop playing with your Wang, and RTFM!"

  10. One word... by mikeage · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashcode. ;)

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  11. His name was Xenu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This comment contained copyrighted text and was removed at the request of the copyright owner under the terms of the DMCA.

    1. Re:His name was Xenu. by reynaert · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Scientology has harrassed Slashdot in the past.

      See Scientologists Force Comment Off Slashdot. This comment, also containing the OT III, was removed. I wonder if they'll notice it this time, now it isn't posted in a Co$-related story.

    2. Re:His name was Xenu. by istartedi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Me What's that?

      S It's an e-meter. It tells you the state of your health, spirit, etc (I don't actually recall what she said) Do you want to try it?

      Me Yes.

      S OK, hold it like this...

      Me Wow. I can make the meter move pretty much any way I like just by gripping it a little more tightly.

      S Don't do that.

      Me How do you know people aren't doing that subconsciously?

      S You have to let go (or something like that). This was accompanied by a look that told me she knew I was a skeptic, she had dealt with us before, didn't really care, and simply wanted to move on to the next sheep. (it's amazing how much can be communicated with just one look sometimes).

      The only other time I've ecountered a Scientologist was downtown. He asked me if I wanted to see a free movie. I figured there would be at least a half hour of propoganda with the movie, and I didn't feel like sitting through that so I declined.

      The way I see it, Scientology is to the private sector what the lottery is to the public sector--a way to tax stupidity.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:His name was Xenu. by csbruce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This was accompanied by a look that told me she knew I was a skeptic, she had dealt with us before, didn't really care, and simply wanted to move on to the next sheep.

      Studies have shown that only about 2% of the general population are vulnerable to cult recruitment & indoctrination. It's only sensible to filter out the other 98% as efficiently as possible.

      (There is another 1-2% who are basically psychotic and will do nasty things just for the asking, but you want to filter them out as well, since they won't follow orders later on.)

    4. Re:His name was Xenu. by Scipher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One time a friend and I were stoned and trying to killing time in the city, when I was given a leaflet advertising "Free IQ test".
      Wanting to see how the green may have affected our intelligence we went to the address to find it was a tiny Church of Scientology hidden away on the third floor of a building that looked condemned. We were greeted and sat down to two tests - an multiple choice IQ test and a timed aptitude test. After completing a drone told us that while the tests were being marked we can watch a film about their organisation. Wanting to get a good look at the religion, I did not hesistate to sit through it. A well-produced piece of propaganda followed. It featured some actor I had never heard of extolling the virtues of finding inner peace and enlightenment through "auditing", and also served to advertise the Scientology meditation retreats (the church owns a large cruise ship, and many hotels). After viewing the film we were presented with the results, both of which were around 140 for the IQ. The IQ results had lines indicating current ability, and the ability levels 1 month and 1 year after joining, projecting 150 and 180 respectively.

      To me this seemed like absolute BS.

      They then started the hard sell, personal testimonies and all. I remember freaking out that these people had so much faith in the fictional construct of a long deceased sci-fi author.
      All we could do was to refuse several times the offer to buy some literature (we asked for it for free; denied) and headed out of there.

      It was a pretty funny afternoon.

      - Scipher

    5. Re:His name was Xenu. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      AFAIK IQ doesn't change much throughout your lifetime, if measured correctly, so the idea that you could go from 140 to 180 is pure fantasy. I could believe a few points variation due to eating a healthy diet vs. eating mcdonalds, but 30%???

    6. Re:His name was Xenu. by k98sven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Studies have shown that only about 2% of the general population are vulnerable to cult recruitment & indoctrination

      I doubt that statement.
      Perhaps it is true if you mean that 2% of the
      population at any given moment in time are vunerable to cult recruitment,
      but in reality: We all have moments when we are weak or depressed, our self-esteem is low and we are vunerable.

      IMHO, realizing this vunerability is an important step in protecting yourself from the dangers of cults.

      Also, realize that people don't join cults.
      They are invited to 'discussion groups' or 'councilling' or 'therapy' or some other cover.

      Cult indoctrination is gradual, like the frog in boiling water. (Or, a bait-and-switch scam as it is known in con-man terms)

    7. Re:His name was Xenu. by nahdude812 · · Score: 2
      I think he means 2% are essentially vulerable, as in at no point in their day/month/year are they not vulnerable, versus the rest of the population that suffers from vulnerability as their mental faculties are worn down by their environment.


      There are people who could be feeling great about themselves, you walk up to them and say "It is evil to feel good about yourself and you should feel ashamed. When you feel guilty, then your guilt can be replaced with good feelings." and these people would fall to the ground quivering because they constantly cycle between feeling good about themselves then feeling guilty for that, causing them to feel good about feeling guilty, ad-vegetum.


      Well, probably not, but some people are extremely controllable in similar means.

    8. Re:His name was Xenu. by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Studies have shown that only about 2% of the general population are vulnerable to cult recruitment & indoctrination. It's only sensible to filter out the other 98% as efficiently as possible.

      (There is another 1-2% who are basically psychotic and will do nasty things just for the asking, but you want to filter them out as well, since they won't follow orders later on.)


      I heard that on top of that, I heard from a reliable resource that there's roughly about another 10-20% who can't do basic math. Percentages, in particular. Can't remember who I heard that from, though.. might've been one of them marketing people?

    9. Re:His name was Xenu. by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2

      Pfff.. 73% of people accept that as a lie!

      I'm kinda amused no one's pointed out my word repetition/stuttering up there. : )

  12. Re:What is CIO? by rewdy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    CIO = Chief Information Officer.

    the purpose of a CIO is to advice and assist his/her supervisors and other senior managers to ensure that information technology is acquired and information resources are managed in a manner that implements the policies and procedures established by that corporation.

    </learnin'>

  13. IBM once told me.. by digitalsushi · · Score: 2, Funny

    This one time on slashdot, there was this IBM ad... they were cocky enough to claim that they could BOX HACKERS OUT and still manage to BUILD TRUST IN.

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  14. Vendor Lie by Metrollica · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the entire software industry:

    "It's not a bug, it's a feature."

    --



    --Metrollica
  15. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I got news for ya. You actually can do stuff with Windows. The vast majority of problems with the WinNT line (Win9X is horrid and i won't defend it at all) has nothing to do with Windows itself.

    I realize I'm going to draw criticism for this, seeing as how apparently some people have issues with Win2k. My perspective on this is from being the assistant-administrator for my office of around 17 or so. Almost everybody is on Win2k, I think one person is on 98. Other than a minor issue with an old laptop having difficulty going into standby mode (a bios flash fixed this), I've had no Windows or even Microsoft related problems to report. The problems that do come up are nearly always the fault of the company making the software. Netscape, for example, doesn't like to stay running for an entire day without crashing at least once. That's not a Windows problem. Netscape has never been known for its stability on any platform.

    In any case, MS certainly kept their promise of greater stability with Windows 2k, and I am very glad that we upgraded the whole office to it.

    Let me give you a piece of advice, though. Do some research before you make a switch like that. Go to www.deja.com, for example, to see what people have to say about a product. If they say it sucks, then keep that in mind. Find out why. We didn't go to 2K until we had tested it on a few machines. We didn't buy it based on a vendor promise. We certainly aren't running MS servers, we're running Linux there. We know better because we looked into it. It is a lot harder to be succeptable to vendor lies when you do reasearch like this.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  16. Chain of [Flash] Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This is actually a multiparter. The vendor basically said that:
    • if the client wanted to have an up-to-date, respectable website, it must have pull-down menus;
    • if they wanted pull-down menus, they must do it in Macromedia Flash; and
    • if they wanted Flash to work on their website, they must switch to Cold Fusion Server.
    The vendor was a Macromedia shop with over a dozen employees; they are now out of business.
  17. things _not_ told. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The ones that I hate the most, are the things not told. But where everything is set up so that it suggests, and you assume, that there's features that's not really there.
    Fx. when comparisons or references to similar products are made and you assume that it has the same features as the other product. And sometimes features gets the same descriptions but it turns out to be a poor substitute.

    Like when a certain software company's whitepapers for a product, claims it can to the same as the competition. When the boss buys it and you get to install it, you discover that it indeed are capable of doing the same things. The only catch is that it is implemented very poorly, but hey, das blinking lights are all in place.

  18. "Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by pivo · · Score: 3, Funny

    This claim was made by a salesman to a non-tech potential client at a company I was visiting. The product had nothing to do with J2EE. The salesperson's rationalization for his misinformation was that their product didn't prevent you from running J2EE applications and therefore was compatible.

    1. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by peter+hoffman · · Score: 2

      That reminds me of the Salesman's Universal Correct and Knowledgeable Answer (SUCKA):

      Yes, when properly configured, our product will do that.

      Of course, it may take a complete rewrite to properly configure the product!

    2. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by AME · · Score: 2

      Actually, the calendar on my VCR screwed up on 1-Jan-2000. It called the year "A0" and the day of the week was off by one. Made programming it to record shows on a particular day a real bother. I tried many things to correct it, but the problem didn't go away until 1-Jan-2001.

      --
      "I have a good idea why it's hard to verify programs. They're usually wrong." --Manuel Blum, FOCS 94
    3. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by fwc · · Score: 2
      VCR's I can understand, some have the date in them for programmed recording. It's the mousepads one store was selling just before Y2K with big "Year 2000 Compliant" stickers on them that made me laugh.

      Makes me wonder what a non-Y2K compliant mouse pad did at a millisecond past the end of 1999..... Or perhaps even a better question, how many people upgraded their mouse pads for fear of them not working after 1999.

    4. Re:"Yes, we are J2EE compatible" by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      VCRs I can understand (they do have a timer after all).

      I saw an advert where a *bread knife* was marked y2k compatible.

  19. 3 lies.. by laserweasel · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I'm sorry you're having problems, ma'am. Our computers are reliable and we rarely recieve customer complaints." - Me when I worked for Dell.

    --
    ["Marge, I agree with you - in theory. In theory, communism works. In theory." - Homer]
    1. Re:3 lies.. by Kythorn · · Score: 2

      Which is the third lie, that you were sorry, or that you worked for dell?

    2. Re:3 lies.. by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Just a guess:

      "I'm sorry you're having problems"
      "Our computers are reliable"
      "we rarely recieve customer complaints"

  20. Song: "The Reviewer" by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 3, Funny
    A funny excerpt from http://www.networkcomputing.com/705/705song2.html :
    We are just reviewers,
    And the vendors, without fail,
    Try to tear down our resistance,
    With an avalanche of vapor,
    Such are promises.
    All lies and jest,
    Still we only hear what we need to hear,
    And we decide who's best.
    ...
    Lie, lie, lie.
    Gosh they vendors, how they lie.
    See them cry,
    Lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie lie

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

  21. NEC by Emugamer · · Score: 2

    I'm sure some of you have purchased PBXs for your works at one time or another so let me tell you my little story.

    Around 18 months ago it was announced that we were merging with a larger non profit in a way to save on administrative costs amoung other things... IT was not really talked to for the majority of the merger talks but then when it was announced, we had to come in and clean the mess. 18 months later everything is fine (replaced ageing computers and cut 1/2 the IT staff) but the PBX system in the meantime was a hassle and a 1/2. Some idiot suggested that for the 10 months that we were in 3 "campuses" that we needed to switch to a single vendor integrated solution. Alright I'll admit it, the idiot was me. But it was a good idea, most people didn't relate to anyone else in the other agency and getting on an integrated phone/computer system would help bridge some of the problems. The problem was the vendors... Computersystems were easy, we would do all the implementation so all we had to do was buy hardware... so we spend 100,000 on some new dells that have been the most reliable machines I have ever seen, no upkeep in terms of hardware and have only had to reinstall one machine. Now to the PBX system... ugh... I probably spent 160 hours talking to different vendors with their great supre fix all solution that in the mean time would save us 20k a year....
    Alright the pitch was good, but there is a catch right? right? of course.. the salesman low balled the equipment price in order to make the sale and therefor wasn't to stringent on how the install went. so after the install was complete, we spent around 35k in service calls getting the system to where it needs to be and what was actually bid. Lawsuits are in the works but its most likely not worth it....

  22. XBox by ksb · · Score: 4, Funny

    The guy in my local computer games store telling me I should replace my ps2 with an XBox because 'Microsoft are far more reliable at fixing bugs and delivering patches' and apparently 'No, they wouldn't charge gamers for said updates or release an in-compatible games box in 6 months to replace it'

    1. Re:XBox by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      The guy in my local computer games store telling me I should replace my ps2 with an XBox because 'Microsoft are far more reliable at fixing bugs and delivering patches' and apparently 'No, they wouldn't charge gamers for said updates or release an in-compatible games box in 6 months to replace it'

      And you're claiming this is a lie why?

      I don't see Microsoft charging for updates (no updates yet - although the next issue or so of XBox mag should have an expansion pack for DOA3), and news for you: it has been six months. Where's the incompatible games box?

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:XBox by x136 · · Score: 2

      I don't see Microsoft charging for updates

      *cough*Win98SE*cough*

      No, it's not Xbox related, but Microsoft has in the past charged for what should have been free updates.

      --
      SIGFEH
    3. Re:XBox by Cylix · · Score: 2

      I think what he means is...

      Have you tried to run a game that requires DirectX 8 and your installed version is 7?

      Bingo, update/feature enhancement that killed backward compatability.

      I'm not complaining, generally the updates are worth it and I doubt this would happen on a console system. Then again, strangers things have happened.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    4. Re:XBox by be-fan · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Maybe because the PS2 software has yet to need *any* patches? This whole "patch" thing is more or less unheard of in the console world. The only bug I've ever seen in a PS2 game is in FF-X, where the text will sometimes smear due to the way the game engine does the water wave effect. In fact, the only time a console has ever crashed on me is once in 1996, when my N64 crashed playing Mario. Most computer users would kill for 6 months without a crash, much less 6 years!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:XBox by FFFish · · Score: 2

      *cough*WinME*cough*

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    6. Re:XBox by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      *cough*Win98SE*cough*

      No, it's not Xbox related, but Microsoft has in the past charged for what should have been free updates.


      They only charged for the new features. You could get all of the bugfixes and service updates as a free download.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    7. Re:XBox by shyster · · Score: 2
      I think what he means is... Have you tried to run a game that requires DirectX 8 and your installed version is 7? Bingo, update/feature enhancement that killed backward compatability

      I think you may be missing the point of backward compatibility. Things are said to be backwards compatible when they are the same as the previous version OF THE SAME PRODUCT. Obviously, App1 v5.0 is not backwards compatible with App2 v7.1. They're not the same app!

      DX8 is backwards compatible with DX7. That is, DX8 externally performs and acts the same as DX7, for everything DX7 does. External programs don't know the difference.

      Your scenario would mean there would never be any updates, because my new program requires a Pentium-233 MHz, which means it killed backwards compatiblity with my 486DX-33MHz. Gotta compare apples to apples you know.

    8. Re:XBox by Silver222 · · Score: 3, Funny
      WinME was a downgrade. Doesn't count.

      --
      "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
  23. Microsoft Lies by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've assembled a few of Microsoft's most outrageous lies at:
    http://www.kmfms.com/whatsbad.html#deception
    They've really churned out more material than I can keep track of (I have a large back-log of links to add to this list), but there are some good ones there. The funniest one on the list (IMO) is the interview where Bill Gates is quoted as saying Microsoft software has no bugs.
    1. Re:Microsoft Lies by swb · · Score: 2

      The link on the front page so no presntations, which presumably means no sales shit, either.

      Obviously Microsoft employees (not "gold partners" or any of that crap) did not actually come to your office and say that shit to your face, so it doesn't count.

    2. Re:Microsoft Lies by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2
      Microsoft may be evil, but none of their web pages commit the sin of having white text on a black background :-)

      Fair enough. Try this link instead (same page, but printer friendly without the colors). I really do normally avoid white text on black backgrounds, but the artwork dictated otherwise for KMFMS - I'm not one to argue with BRUTE!.

    3. Re:Microsoft Lies by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2
      You know what? The same is also true of Windows 3.1. The release of Windows XP didn't suddenly make Windows 3.1 stop working.

      Perhaps I should have been more precise - much of the recent Linux software will still run fine on older machines. The same cannot be said for Windows 3.1. Microsoft stopped supporting Windows 3.1 a long time ago. Good luck trying to get recent software to run on Win3.1. On the other hand, recent Linux software runs remarkably well even on older hardware. I have an old Pentium 90 running a recent version of Linux, including a recent firewall, recent NAT, recent Apache, recent NFS server, etc. I think it's pretty clear that the same availability does not apply to Windows 3.1 - sure you can still run it, but you will be stuck with old, outdated applications.

    4. Re:Microsoft Lies by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 5, Funny
      Microsoft may be evil, but none of their web pages commit the sin of having white text on a black background :-)


      You mean, like MSDOS?

      -- this is not a sig.
    5. Re:Microsoft Lies by AugstWest · · Score: 4, Funny

      My favorite line from Microsoft will always be one of the blurbs from the Win95 installation:

      "Everything you do will be more fun"

    6. Re:Microsoft Lies by shyster · · Score: 2
      I have an old Pentium 90 running a recent version of Linux, including a recent firewall, recent NAT, recent Apache, recent NFS server, etc. I think it's pretty clear that the same availability does not apply to Windows 3.1 - sure you can still run it, but you will be stuck with old, outdated applications

      No, I don't know of those services being available for Win 3.1. But I could easily install Windows 95/98/98SE or even Windows NT 4.0 Server or Workstation on your Pentium-90.

    7. Re:Microsoft Lies by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2
      No, I don't know of those services being available for Win 3.1. But I could easily install Windows 95/98/98SE or even Windows NT 4.0 Server or Workstation on your Pentium-90.
      I don't think so. NT4.0 Workstation requires 16MB of memory with 32MB recommended - my Pentium-90 only has 14MB. Sure, you could install NT4.0, but it would crawl. Linux is humming along nicely without a sweat.

      That's kind of beside the point, though. Windows 95 is already not supported by Microsoft. Windows 98 is about to be moved to the unsupported category as well. What happens if you are running Win95 on a computer now and some massive security hole is exposed that Win95 is vulnerable to? Answer: you're screwed. Microsoft does not support Win95, so you cannot expect a patch from them if you are running Win95 on your old hardware. Now, what happens if you are running Linux on your old hardware and a security hole is discovered? Answer: you either download the latest version or you can patch the source code yourself. For this reason alone, Linux is a viable option for older hardware while Windows is not - it would be irresponsible to rely on software that is an unsupported black box that is ignored by the only organization with the necessary information to fix it (i.e., the source code).

    8. Re:Microsoft Lies by dylan_- · · Score: 2

      I guess it's this

      dylan_-

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    9. Re:Microsoft Lies by armb · · Score: 2

      > Bill Gates is quoted as saying Microsoft software has no bugs.

      Be fair. He said no "significant" bugs. Meaning the suckers keep buying the stuff, so why bother fixing it?

      --
      rant
    10. Re:Microsoft Lies by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      I've run Enlightenment (16.3, I believe) with X 3.3.6 on a Pentium 133 w/ 48M of RAM w/ a res of 800x600@16bit. (1.2G scsi-1 drive and nitro 3d graphics card w/ 2M RAM for the other system specs)(the Stormix distro w/ the 2.2 kernel - I don't recall what the codename was). It ran quite well(quickly, responsively, whatever you want to call it), was useable, and stable. Please note that this was over a year ago, when E was -the- state of the art in desktops. This same system was unable to run Win98 (or WinNT for that matter) quickly at all, and it was incredibly frustrating to use. It was classically unstable, and had the usual windows symptoms. Please note that the linux software in question was much, much 'newer' than the old, outdated Windows 98 or WinNT (SP4, if I recall correctly).

      Given enough RAM (192M, say?), (due to X 4.x's high memory req's) older systems (say, a P2/ppro 200) can run modern desktops without a hitch. Win2k is pretty iffy on even 350's w/ the same RAM configuration, and that's 2 years old!

      Don't even get me started on servers - I've got quiet a few 'old' desktop systems serving as office servers for various tasks. (P75's, P200's). Please note they're mostly running Debian Woody, some running potato. This is 'new' software, if you recall. No version of Windows could even begin to perform the job that these servers do. I suspect it would take twice as many, twice as powerful systems to carry the tasks at hand.

      Please try and become informed before opinions are formed.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    11. Re:Microsoft Lies by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      Ok, what about the 33Mhz 486 that I use as a iptables/smb/ftp/http/ipsec system? 12M RAM, and quite responsive throughout (as much as could be expected at 33Mhz Intel, at any point in time).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  24. write your own operating system ... by beanerspace · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yup, that's what the salesman told us back in 1984 or 1985 in some computer store downtown NYC.

    My friend/co-worker, Mike X. decided to go to CompuLand or something like that, to see the new line of PC clones. When we got to the store, someone straight out of Saturday Night Fever began to pitch us a system with the integrity of a used car salesmen.

    When we started asking questions about the operating system, he perceptively asked us, with a wonderfully Broolynese accent "... you guys are programmers, right ?"

    He went on, now with a bit of body English "... well I'm a programmer, you're a programmer ... you know ... you can write your own operating system ... I did."

    Appearently Mike had the same thought at the same moment I did ... only he voice his "... hey, if you can write an operating system, what are you doing here ?"

    Needless to say, the salesguy left us alone from therein.

    1. Re:write your own operating system ... by cpeterso · · Score: 5, Funny


      Appearently Mike had the same thought at the same moment I did ... only he voice his "... hey, if you can write an operating system, what are you doing here ?"

      ... and that salesman's name was Linus Torvalds!

    2. Re:write your own operating system ... by smallpaul · · Score: 2

      What's the difference between a computer novice and a computer salesman? About a week.

    3. Re:write your own operating system ... by rehannan · · Score: 2

      And now you know... the rest of the story.

      Close, but not quite. It's actually

      And now you know... the rrrrrrrest of the story.

    4. Re:write your own operating system ... by mediahacker · · Score: 2, Funny
      Naaaa - it was probably Bernard Shifman

      http://www.petemoss.com/spamflames/experiences.htm l

  25. Number of users and what users are doing by sourcehunter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Company providing a huge piece of software for one of my clients - "It has been tested and we have X (don't remember exact number - greater than 5) using it remotely." We ask - how? Terminal services? VPN? PCA? "Oh directly over the network, some via a 56k dialup". Uh huh. Most were using PCA (unacceptable for my client's applications). None were using terminal services, and none had implemented the package in anywhere but the home office.

    I had to write a special app just to get it to work on terminal server. Running it over a Point to Point T1 line was too slow, so even the folks in customer's biggest remote office (connected via the FULL point-to-point T1) have to use terminal services.

    Same company: oh, sure the database is stable. And the ODBC driver works well.

    FEH

    Can't complain too much - their bugs keeps my company busy and hence well paid.

    --

    quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
    1. Re:Number of users and what users are doing by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Sounds *exactly* like a software package in use at my company. Exactly:(

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  26. When service would be available. by ipsuid · · Score: 4, Funny

    A few months ago I moved to where I currently live. I called Comcast (the only cable company choice here) and asked if cable modems were available. After getting my address the service rep on the line replied "Absolutely. Would you like to setup cable service now?"

    Happy, I went through the process of setting up an account. I was told that once the cable was installed, I could call back and setup the cable modem account.

    A week later, cable installed, I call back. "Sorry, they aren't available yet". hmm. I asked when they would be. "Next week." I was disappointed, but hey, only a week.

    I called back a week later. Now it was a month. I called back a month later, now they weren't sure, and I got a "Well, people in that call center don't know what they are talking about."

    Two months later I call back. Still not available. By this point I had DSL installed (a whole 'nother story). I made one final call to get them to remove service (The only reason I got it to begin with was because of the cable modem!)

    BTW, the whole time this was going on, several neighbors and I were all getting fliers from Comcast to sign up for cable modem service.

    --
    It appears Ockham lost his razor and grew a beard.
    1. Re:When service would be available. by AnalogBoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Be glad. Comcast makes @home, at their worst, look good.

      Limited NNTP Service. They dislike it when you run servers. They really dislike it when you have a NAT. Their mail service is pretty unreliable, sometimes working fine but sometimes taking hours to send or recieve a message.

      They won't even talk to you if you dont have their software installed.

      one of my calls with them went like so:

      "Whats your mailserver address?"
      "Install our software and it will set all that up for you, in addition make some highly technical changes to your system to improve the performance of our software"
      "is that what i asked you?"
      "Its all we can tell you."

      I explained to them that I am the only person i want making changes to my system.. as i was irritated.

      Ugh.. i want an ISP with a clue. I'll get DSL once i find a new job. anyone know where i can find a new job?

      Maybe i'll start my own ISP.. with a advanced support option over the phone that says "If you have a clue, press the digit corresponding to the difference of the number of layers in the OSI Model and the DOD model. Otherwise, press one to speak to our customer support center."

      Comcast's local support number actually has the audacity to state: "If you have not installed the comcast software press 1. If you have installed the software, press 2."

      If you press one, it says "Please install the software, downloadable from www.comcast.net/connectioncenter/, and call back *hangup*".

      thats just wrong on so many different levels.

    2. Re:When service would be available. by lkaos · · Score: 2

      Ha!

      About 3 years ago I called up Comcast asking about cable modems. No dice, Comcast had just acquired Jones Intercable (my former cable company) and were upgrading old software. Scheduled to be available in a year.

      Called up a 8 months later when the school that's about a mile down the street got cable. Still not available, the school was an 'experiment' to see how the equipment would work. Wait a few months, we'll call you when it's ready.

      About a year later, still call up again. Got nice little run around about it being available and actually signed up but was later called up and told that it turns out it wasn't available but would be real soon.

      Finally I decided about 3 months ago to see if it was available yet. What was I told? Will be available in a year.

      Oh well, no high bandwidth for me :(

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    3. Re:When service would be available. by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 2

      I've had the same experience with Comcast. Personally, I don't believe they really have any cable modem customers, nor that they really provide any high speed internet access of any sort, andthat their ads are all just a sham :)

      I mean, if it was available, I'd have it now, right? hehe

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    4. Re:When service would be available. by choco · · Score: 2

      A few years ago BT (British Telecommunications) started offereing a CLI ( caller ID) service.

      When making calls you could prefix the number with 141 to prevent your number being disclosed to the called party.

      It was also possible to have your line changed, Free of Charge, so that the default was NOT to release the number, but if you the prefixed the number dialled with 1470 - it would release the number to the called party.

      BT decided that

      a) They didn't want people to select the "default withhelf" option

      b) That one means they were going to use was to deny that the "1470" to release Caller ID even existed.

      I have several telephone lines. Some were set to default withheld and some not. I phoned sales to change the status one of the lines. I had time on my hands so I decided to have some fun.

      So sales answer and I say what I want. They immediately start down their standard script designed to talk me out of it. As each point was raised I countered with a reason why it didn't matter to me. One of my counter-arguments revolved around using 1470 to over-ride the default. The salesman denied that the code existed or that it would work. I stated that I had already used the code many times and it had worked just fine. He told me I must be mistaken. I said I had a line to hand with a Caller display box and another line to hand set to default "with-held". I then made him sit and wait there while I went through the experiment. I then asked him to explain what I observed (which was 1470 working perfectly). The situation was laughable. I knew he was lying. He knew he was lying. he knew that I knew he was lying and he knew he was defending the indefensible. However he was not allowed to deviate from the official line...

      BT policy has now changed. They now admit that 1470 works and they now allow "default withheld" without reading the 101 good reasons why you shouldn't first.

      --------------

      I also some fun at the expense of a dodgy company in London who were running a premium rate sex-line service using some very dubious business techniques. I decided to bait them. So I made a ten second call from a number which would normally get no incoming calls. I then waited for a call from their billing department. Everytime they called they got another load of lies and rubbish from me. The game was to see how many times they would attempt to get the name and address before they finally gave up. The answer was over 30.

      Amongst other gems - I played a message saying "I'm sorry, this number has changed, please call again earlier". They rang back three times to hear that one. Sometimes I just told them blatant lies - like I was a curry house and gave an (almost valid) address as an almost uninhabited Scottish Island.

      When I was feeling really bored I'd set the system up to relay all calls back to one of their own chat lines.

      --
      AJB
    5. Re:When service would be available. by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      Verizon started advertising DSL in my area by sending out flyers about *1 year* before it was avaliable. We got several flyers, and when you called to ordrer, they would take your name and tell you basically to sit tight and it would be here soon ... meanwhile they'd keep mailing you flyers telling you to order

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  27. Dont forget "Real Soon Now" by Evil+Pete · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And who can forget the Ashton-Tate PR guy who stated for the press that DBase IV would be out "Real soon now". Didn't come out for another 18 months. Unwittingly coined a classic description of vapourware. In fact I gotta feeling that debacle was also one of the first instances of the term "vapourware".
    Basic lesson , don't trust them ... even if its in writing.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
    1. Re:Dont forget "Real Soon Now" by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      Duke Nukem Forever???

      Whats it been, 4 years now? Perhaps more?

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:Dont forget "Real Soon Now" by Jay+L · · Score: 2

      I think "Real Soon Now" was coined (in its capitalized, ironic form) by Jerry Pournelle in Byte.

  28. Monster cable! by lkeagle · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It will reduce the 'skin effect' for better sound, and the arrows on the side indicate that it should be plugged in in that direction, because the electrons flow better that way." -- pimply 18 year old at The Good Guys

    ~Loren

    1. Re:Monster cable! by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      A friend of mine has a pair of monster speaker cables that cost $500.00. He didn't buy them - a wealthy friend of his owns an audio/video store. these things are about 1" in diameter each, oxygen free, blah, blah, blah, blah..

      And i don't notice a bit of difference between those and my $20.00 monster cables. I just don't. Maybe its because im not an audiophile.

    2. Re:Monster cable! by sharkey · · Score: 2

      And i don't notice a bit of difference between those and my $20.00 monster cables.

      Amen. Instead of shelling out $50-$60 for a 6' digital coax at Ovation, I bought a $9 6' digital coax at the hardware store. Seems to work pretty damn well. the 100s of feet of coax I've bought at hardwares stores to extend my cable TV in various residences works damn well, Comcast's claims to the contrary.

      The CAT-5 connectors and jacks at Lowe's, on the other hand...

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:Monster cable! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Funny

      I remember reading about an experiment; a guy took a coat hanger, plugged it from his DVD player to a good reciever, and watched it count the Dolby Digital bit errors - 0.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:Monster cable! by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      hehe!

      just curious about your sig - i've seen it around quite a bit - how long have you been a member of the gloriously unemployed? If you'll excuse my assumption

    5. Re:Monster cable! by laserjet · · Score: 2

      you are a good guy, sharkey. i have enjpyed your posts for years.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    6. Re:Monster cable! by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of a Belkin or somesuch "modem cable" that was molded and had gold conductors for faster dialup internet connections. Sheesh.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    7. Re:Monster cable! by awol · · Score: 2

      I soooo agree. I used to work for a guy who was a bit of a genius when it came to analog electronics. (Television design history, knowing the part catalogs off by heart etc etc). Anyway his standard reply to anyone who wanted to sell this "super quality cable" was "Can you hear grass grow?" to which the only honest answer is no, "Then you can't hear the difference between this and brand X" At which point he just bought lots of good multicore copper and saved mucho deniro.

      --
      "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
  29. Re:Good point.... by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Back in the 1GHz days, the Athlon and PIII were comparable MHz for MHz. The P4 and Athlon XP are so different that comparing using clock speed simply isn't possible.

    While the PR scheme is a bit dodgy, what do you expect them to do? When a customer comes in to a shop and sees "2.2GHz!!!!!!!" for the P4 and "1.667Ghz" for the Athlon XP, which do you think they'll go for? Unless they're one of the clued in types, they'll fall for the larger number.

  30. Sales culture is to blame by scubacuda · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Has anyone stopped to ponder the sales culture that encourages this hype?

    Show me a sales rep who is patient enough to sit down and listen to the specifics of what a product does and doesn't. I have worked in sales for a long time, and I've seen one, maybe two who can. (Oddly enough, these guys were ENGINEERS before they become sales clowns.)

    Too many sales reps thrive on the intangible: possibility, maybes, etc. Put them in front of an Excel sheet (or WORSE) a white board, and you're REALLY in for a doosy. I see my own people committing these atrocities in meetings with customers. I then have to then gracefully butt in and "clarify" what the assclown has just promised.

    It's also sick to see them all assemble together. These fuckwads get drunk and there's no stopping the information warpage. I have seen sales goons literally gut a company that once had a bright future.

    1. Re:Sales culture is to blame by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      At the same time, these sales idiots can really help out a floundering company.

      Don't know what your direction is? Well, who's the one talking to the people who make decisions at the companies making contracts with you? The sales guy knows what your customers want to hear your product does...so you might as well just make it do it.

      Of course, development of this type is totally unsupportable and encoruages the worst design imaginable. But it keeps you in business to strike with a really great product when you finally figure out what it is you want to do.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  31. Re:Apple takes the crown by feldsteins · · Score: 2

    "...advertising the Mac as being 2x faster than PCs. Though they dont technically lie, the way they present their data is the same thing..."

    No argument there. Although this is didn't used to be such a "lie," in the last couple of years it really became one.

    "For some reason people see Apple as being a good corperation, not like the evil variety such as MS..."

    People see them that way because that's what they are: a good company. They sell fine products at prices that people are willing to pay and that people are highly satisfied with. They don't kick puppies and they don't pinch babies. Not that I've heard anyway.

    Now Microsoft, on the other hand... ;)

    --
    You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
  32. boy I know what you mean... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is partially true, on a mhz per mhz comparison. I found a Lightwave benchmark site at http://www.blanos.com/benchmark/index.html , it shows that in nearly all cases the Mac was significantly more efficient, mhz wise, to the PC. But what it doesn't show is the price per performance ratio. 1gig Macs just recently showed up at a time when PC's were at 2 gigz. They perform roughly the same.

    Figure Athlon into this, and the benchmarks get more interseting. An Athlon 4 1.2 gig rendered a scene in 130 seconds, a Macintosh 867 took 271 seconds. I think both those processors came out about the same time, but that's a big difference, dontcha think?

    In any case, I agree with you. Marketing has a way of twisting the numbers to their favor. It's funny how if you narrow a perspective a bit, you seem a lot more favorable.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  33. Local tech support by Refried+Beans · · Score: 3, Funny

    We had a local PC vendor where I grew up that told some tall tales. One teacher in our school bought a PC from him. She was having a hard time getting her sound card to work. He told her that she needed to bring her computer in to him so he could download the drivers _off_ the card.

  34. Conversion of old database by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    We bought a new database because we were told that the old one would be converted to the new system. After a month and a half we finally got the "converted" database back. All they'd done was import the tables -- a process that would take maybe a whole afternoon. They hadn't even linked variables, they certainly hadn't converted any forms or reports. It took me 6-9 months to fix that problem and I never did get a fix for the fact that one part of the program was incapably of displaying/handling dates in anything but American MM/DD/YY format -- I'm in Australia (DD/MM/YY).

    The database package in question is DB-Text (version 3). I won't mention the national distributer's name as they'd probably sue me.

    1. Re:Conversion of old database by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Similar issue:

      Got a project from a client - well, half a project. We got the 'web' half, and the other team got the 'database' half. The database was SQL7, but that team said it had to be upgraded to SQL2000 - they'd handle the whole thing.

      For some reason, the first 7 weeks we weren't allowed to know who the other team was. Turns out they were down the road from us. Well, we coded against the spec we were given. They didn't. They 'upgraded' the SQL7 to SQL2000 database.

      Guess how? Using the 'upgrade' wizard which would have taken about 20 minutes? Nope - they apparently recreated everything by hand. About 50 tables, maybe 20-30 columns each. This apparently took them 8 weeks. Oh, yeah, this was the best part:

      Every column in every table was VARCHAR(50). Didn't matter what it used to be.

      *THEY* got paid. *WE* got stuck essentially recreating/upsizing the SQL7 -> 2000 database (absolutely no reason to, except that that's the only DB they now had) and had to do that in about 2 days while debugging the code we were working on.

      VARCHAR(50). For everything.

    2. Re:Conversion of old database by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      VARCHAR(50). For everything.
      Imagine Jay (from the Kevin Smith movies) going 'Hol-eeee SHIT!' and you've got my reaction. Oh, and for the record, I'm going to get this put on a t-shirt.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:Conversion of old database by sigwinch · · Score: 2

      LOL! That's one of the funniest things I've ever heard.

      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    4. Re:Conversion of old database by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      the program was incapably of displaying/handling dates in anything but American MM/DD/YY format -- I'm in Australia (DD/MM/YY).

      I'm in america, and my preferred date format is CCYYMMDD. :-)

  35. how about Oracle? They're pretty good liars by WildBeast · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Don't you guys remember when Oracle started advertising their database server as unbreakable?

    1. Re:how about Oracle? They're pretty good liars by beta21 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Their database server is unbreakable as long as you don't start it.

  36. Licence? since when? by oo7tushar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Our product will integrate seamlessly into your system. Just tell your developers to read the documentation and within minutes they'll modify it to match your needs"

    Licence agreement says: Any modification of code is prohibited. Use of external code to modify databases created by our program is prohibited.

    Remember to send at least 10 copies of that line to the purchaser in the company. It's important they read it prior to signing the million dollar deal. It's your ass on the line, not theirs.

  37. Post above: not intended as flamebait. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Okay, just to be clear, if you are reading this as "I'm trying to piss off anti-MS people..." then I ask you to read it again. I'm talking about actual experience here with what I believe to be a good OS. The only reason this would draw 'flames' is because people are hard set in their opinions about MS. I can't do anything about that. I'm hoping maybe that if they see that there are people in the world doing just fine with MS, then maybe they'll open their minds a bit to alternatives like MS out there.

    Trust me, if I were going for flame bait the post would have been rather different. I've been given 2 points for being insightful so far, take that as an indication that at least 2 people thought I wasn't trying to start a flame war.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  38. five biggest lies i've bought into by cosmo7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1: a massive 16K of RAM (1980)
    2: a massive 512K of RAM (1985)
    3: a massive 8M of RAM (1991)
    4: a massive 128M of RAM (1996)
    5: a massive 1.5G of RAM (this weekend)

    1. Re:five biggest lies i've bought into by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

      I noticed your curve is shrinking. 512 is 32x 16. The rest are 16x greater than the previous number. Your last upgrade is 12x. In this case, I don't think you underpurchased. I think memory requirements are starting to slow down. You might get more than 5-6 years out of that upgrade. Assuming, of course, memory PERFORMANCE isn't an issue.

  39. Re:Good point.... by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    While the PR scheme is a bit dodgy

    A *bit* dodgy? It's like lying to your customer's face about how fast the computer is. Don't give me any of this B.S. about "the P4 and Athlon XP are so different that..."; the processors are being sold as things that they are NOT. Period.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  40. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by WildBeast · · Score: 2

    Ever heard of SMS? If not, you can always write a Perl, Python, VB, ASP, PHP, Java script to check each w2k system.

  41. All Your Base Are Belong To Us by AntiNorm · · Score: 5, Funny

    When all our base are clearly not belong to you.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
    1. Re:All Your Base Are Belong To Us by vanguard · · Score: 2

      I've seen this so many times. Can somebody please explain what this quote is about? Did Bill G say it? I'm missing something. Everybody knows about this except me.

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
  42. NT by PenguinX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft touting "Zero Administration" when Windows NT 4.0 came out. My boss was like "we'll save so much!!! I can't even project the numbers!"... tisk tisk. Good thing I told him to wait until the marketing hype died ;-)

  43. GIR by shiva · · Score: 3, Funny

    "It's not stupid, it's advanced!"

  44. Killer Instinct... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Coming to your home in 1995, only on the Nintendo ULTRA 64!" -- the game Killer Instinct, if you can find that in arcades, very loudly says that hehe.

    For the uninitiated, the Nintendo 64 (ultra was dropped...) came out in 1996 with a whopping 2 games at launch.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  45. Playstation... by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The reason that Playstations are going bad is because people are misusing them." -- that's what Sony said when they had LOTS of returned, defective Playstations.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  46. Maybe it doesn't count by evilpaul13 · · Score: 2

    but I installed Windows 98 this week (don't ask) and it said during the install it was the most stable and best performing version of windows ever, when NT4 was clearly better...

  47. EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by weave · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The nightmare I have had with this company after buying two of their SANs knows no bounds. After almost a year of begging and pleading, I still don't have a valid service contract with them. The sales rep promised me 3 years hardware 7x24 service on both systems and I still don't have anything in writing on this. I've bitched to all levels of the company as well. I get promises that this issue is getting attention from high levels of the company, and then silence.

    Then there's the software support service contract. It took me months to get them to bill us, then they send a bill for $16K, we send it in, then when it's time to place a service call it's "who are you again?". Our $16,000 is missing, no one knows where it is, even though I have a copy of the canceled check they cashed. We are now getting dunning letters demanding payment at the same time getting a cancellation notice on another contract we had with them along with a credit invoice. So now THAT system is up-in-the-air.

    They are the most screwed up company I've ever had the displeasure of dealing with. I won't even go into the crap software they use. Their linux fiber HBA drivers use sg version 3.0.16 for lk 2.2. When I tried to update it, everything broke. Turns out, and this was told to me from the driver's author no less, that sg version 3.0 was a development branch only, and that every minor release changed the interface and that EMC had *NO* business putting this crap into production. I ended up getting EMC code out of it (thank god I had source) and folding it into sg rev 3.1x under lk 2.4.

    The site engineer I have is the only bright spot in the entire company. He's trying to get my contract issues resolved. It's time critical, because I've heard they are farming out their higher ed contracts to Dell (which actually may be a good thing).

    EMC may be good to megacorps that spend 10s of millions a year on their "frames", but if you only spend a half a mil (which we did), from my perspective at least, it seems like they could care less about you...

    1. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your experiences with EMC may make you think that they treat large companies well. I work for a large company (Enough over 25k employees as to be huge) that has several EMC disk arrays, a couple of which are attached to servers I administrate.

      To get their lies out of the way first. I communicated some service problems I have had with EMC to someone I know who is in another company which was considering partnering with EMC. EMC upon hearing of my service woes, promised to these people's face to contact me "before you leave this week". That was actually the second time they had promised to contact me to deal with my service problems. Well, they never even attempted to contact me.

      EMC sells a product called "SRDF" which is used to synchronize two Symmetrix EMC frames (or parts thereof) usually over TCP, and keep them synchronized. On more than one occassion we needed to copy a large amount (about 1TB or so) of data from one frame to another over a wide area network. EMC suggested using SRDF. When I asked about the security of the transfer I was informed by a semi-technical (professional services sales) person that SRDF was "completely secure because only another EMC frame could understand our proprietary format." It took me about two minutes to describe two methods by which the data could be caught and understood, a few minutes later I thought of a third way.

      In service, my problems with EMC are too numerous to go into here. One of the worst service problems (which was also combined with a bit of a lie) was when we were doing a major change to the EMC frame. We reviewed the change heavily with EMC to try to make sure everything was covered. EMC specifically told us that Veritas Volume Manager would respond well, and that it was fully supported. The change caused a large (> 2 day) outage on the server which was traced back to the change being made online despite EMC's promise that it could be done online. During the aftermath discussion, EMC proclaimed "we do not support Veritas". Even the senior managers who were listening in realized how much EMC was being fast and loose with the facts. (Some of it instead of ouright lying, was leaving out details to make other people look bad and imply that had certain things been done the outage would not have occured, when in fact, they didn't make a bit of difference.)

    2. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      it seems like they could care less about you
      Why does the American version of this saying use "could", doesn't "couldn't" make a lot more sense?
    3. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by weave · · Score: 2
      I just looked at your ask slashdot. I also got the pitch for EMC's mirroring product for Symmetrix. Very expensive, yes.

      I guess it all depends on what you are protecting. You should be able to replicate database transactions to a backup server as they happen so that is covered. For normal file system files, I use rsync. Works well but isn't immediate. Still, it's an easier off-site backup strategy than carting tapes back and forth, as long as you have the WAN bandwidth, and it's a tad bit cheaper than doing mirrored SANs.

    4. Re:EMC - Best Service Company Ever... by weave · · Score: 2
      Well, I know no one reads /. stories when they are 24 hours old, but I thought I'd add some followup comments to my rant above.

      First, my memory is a bit off, the sg version mentioned that EMC used was 3.0.10, not 3.0.16 as stated above. The fact about it being a development version and that EMC should never have used it was stated by the modules author, Douglas Gilbert, in a private e-mail to me (I did ask him later if I could disclose this publically and he said yes.)

      A portion of his message I dug up...

      Ken,
      Ouch, the sg version 3 interface was under development then.

      From my archives:
      -rw-r--r-- 1 dougg dougg 25035 Jan 25 2000 sg3010.tgz
      -rw-r--r-- 1 dougg dougg 25603 Mar 11 2000 sg3012.tgz

      This driver was targeted at lk 2.4 which was released in January this year. The lk 2.2 port was to allow people to test it on production OSes.

      The defining property of version 3 of the sg driver is an additional interface. It is used by the SG_IO ioctl() [0x2285]. I changed the interface between those 2 versions. If memory serves, someone complained. It was on the sg website so people could test it (not hardcode it into a proprietary solution). DG/EMC have never contacted me about this.

  48. Automatic Butt-holer... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    My dad ran across an advertisement for a sewing machine in the newspaper once. It had a special feature: "an automatic buttholer".

    My dad never did by the machine, but I have a feeling they were lying when they said it had a feature to automatically butthole something.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Automatic Butt-holer... by seanadams.com · · Score: 2

      It had a special feature: "an automatic buttholer".

      You missed the fine print: there's a "per anum" service fee to get that feature.

    2. Re:Automatic Butt-holer... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "You missed the fine print: there's a "per anum" service fee to get that feature."

      LOL!!! 'So fast, you can sew by the seat of your pants!' (Sorry, that's the best I could come up with. Drink a couple of beers and then read it.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  49. Re:Sun Whoppers by elmegil · · Score: 2

    I'll give you all the others, despite disagreeing with them. But how in fsck's name can you say with a straight face that Java is not Object Oriented?

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  50. 384k upload! by Fortuna+Wolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The place I live sells accounts to rooms, single port in a room, you call in, 30 dollars to sign up, and 20 for a month, sounds good, right?
    So I call them up, ask them, what's the service, the plan, the billing, etc...
    don't worry, its 2.2 mbps down, and 384kbps upload!
    Ok, sounds good... sign me up.
    well, aside from a quick little problem with the router attaching itself to your mac address,
    it turns out that its sharing one road runner account through the whole apartment complex.
    I call up tech support "can you tell me why my internet connection sucks so badly?"
    re: "because its a sucky connection on sucky routers" (that's what tech support said, at least THEY were being honest).
    well, can you fix it?
    Sure, let us kick some other people off the network...
    eeee!
    Right now, I download at about 20-30k, and my upload is around the ballpark of .4k
    I can't play CS, because my choke is at 100 and my ping is 2000.
    Give me a 36.6k modem! Pleaasseeee...

    --
    Disclaimer:The "Human" attached to this account is unresponsible for anything unless it wants responsibility.
  51. Compression Algorithm by Prowl · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    That man tried to kill mah Daddy
  52. The Hurd out this year by pinkpineapple · · Score: 2

    PPA, the girl next door.

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
    1. Re:The Hurd out this year by Xerithane · · Score: 2

      Good one.

      But it should be GNU/Hurd. :-)

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
  53. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  54. Hacker's arent allowed to use our service... by marvonmars · · Score: 5, Funny

    While improving the code on a client's website, I became suspicious of the credit card validation code. The setup was that a user would get sent offsite to the credit card validation service. They would enter their credit card details and the validation service would process the card, bill the user, and then send an activation code to my client's website. Recieving the activation code was confirmation that the credit card was legit and the user was a paying customer.
    The problem was that the authorization code was always the same. In fact, according to the validation service's spec, the code was always '0000'. And all the codes were sent via the web pages the user accessed as HTML hidden variables. One could (and I did) build dummy HTML pages that simply sent the authorization code to the website, bypassing the validation service, and recieving all the goodies reserved for paying customers.
    So I went to see the validation service people to explain to them their non-existant securtity model. And they acknowledged the problem and said they would have it fixed promptly. And if you believe that, boy have I got a bridge you'ld love to have!
    First they claimed that since the code was a 'hidden variable' no one could see it.
    After I built the dummy page in front of them (in friggin notepad), they claimed that I didnt get all the authentication codes in and they were sending 'secret, invisible' authorization codes that didn't appear on the web pages. Nevermind the fact if I, as the website programmer, couldn't access those 'secret, invisible' authorization codes I couldn't well check for them to autheticate users could I?
    Then, they claimed that only people like me could do it, and that I was a Hacker (captial H, please). And, don't you know, Hackers arent allowed to access the validation service.
    It was really bad. I ended up yelling at their chief programmer and calling him a liar to his face before they finally stopped stonewalling.

    1. Re: Hacker's arent allowed to use our service... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > While improving the code on a client's website, I became suspicious of the credit card validation code. ... The problem was that the authorization code was always the same. In fact, according to the validation service's spec, the code was always '0000'. One could (and I did) build dummy HTML pages that simply sent the authorization code to the website, bypassing the validation service, and recieving all the goodies reserved for paying customers.

      Hey -- you forgot to give us a link to the site!

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re: Hacker's arent allowed to use our service... by cpeterso · · Score: 2

      you forgot to give us a link to the site!

      www.hotmail.com

  55. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by mgblst · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sure it wasn't 64 bytes??? Or 64 bits???

  56. 4 hours battery life on my Compaq Presario by pinkpineapple · · Score: 2

    ... maybe in sleep mode ;-)

    PPA, the girl next door.

    --
    -- I feel better now. Thanks for asking.
  57. Re: Guns by elmegil · · Score: 2

    Exactly. No people, no toast.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  58. Now that. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    ...now that is 1 degree of seperation.

    Fake.

  59. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Tuzanor · · Score: 2

    it was "640K ought to be enough for anybody" not "you will never need more than 64kb of ram"

  60. Sun Microsystems by Draco · · Score: 2, Informative


    With the release of the UltraSprac 3 we've solved all of our "ecache bit-flipping cause your machine to crash at random times" issues.

  61. While comparing complex Enterprise support... by tchdab1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    .... utility packages (costing millions!), the salesman of the vastly inferior product promised me that it would be rewritten to completely match the features of the product I preferred (it had nearly none of them), and that most of it would be done by the next release less than 6 months away. I was then flown to the "developent center" and introduced to the (1) developer who had just been hired, who was told to promise me the same thing. When I asked, I was told there were no plans in place, no direction, no schedule yet to make this happen "but you can be our model customer and drive it!".

    It boggles my mind, but many within my own organization believed these people and I had quite the fight to keep from buying this and then being the one whose job it would be to make it work.

    Go figure.

  62. Those silly retail shareware vendors 10 yrs ago by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think that the vendors who sold shareware games in those little rectangular plastic packages just bigger than the 5.25" disk were a joke. This was in the late 80s and early 90s.

    I'm not actually talking about the companies that made the games (Epic, Apogee mostly) but the actual companies that manufactured and sold the shareware packs on bargain racks in Radio Shack for $4.99 a piece.

    It was baloney because if you looked at the screen caps on the back of the packages, they only showed screenshots from the registered versions of the game, while the disk inside was the shareware version (i.e. the one you get for free from BBSs.) This pissed me off so much, especially when I spent my hard earned allowance dough on what I thought was a real registered copy of Paganitzu but it was the shareware one I already played.

    1. Re:Those silly retail shareware vendors 10 yrs ago by Phexro · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, yes... The shareware rack. I never got suckered into that, I had a blazing fast 14.4k modem, so I just downloaded all the shareware from my local BBSes.

      However, I once saw one of those racks at Future Shop. On the back of every package was the phrase "Hermetically sealed to prevent viruses!"

      Had a good laugh about that one.

  63. An SNMP-enabled router, by any chance? by leonbrooks · · Score: 3, Funny
    the chances of you hacking into my box are slim to none. [Specially considering I am behind a router].

    You really shouldn't roll out the red carpet like that. (-:0
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  64. You need this digital coax cable by Drakino · · Score: 2

    I have a reciever with both digital coax and optical inputs. When looking over the cables deciding, a Best Buy rep (Monster cable certified as well) talked to me about it. I asked what cable I should get, optical or coax. His response was to go with the coax because optical is unreliable due to vibrations that might occur, distorting the sound. I asked how an expensive Monster Cable optical could possibly get to the point of cutting off the optical signal without someone physicially bending the cable really hard, and how enterprise storage solutions seems to work fine on miles of flimsy optical cable in server rooms with tons of possible minute vibrations from the air movement.

    In the end, I went with a normal RCA cable for the run since it works.

    1. Re:You need this digital coax cable by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      End result, he's right. Someone who doesn't know optical can quite easily break the glass -- especially those used to running copper.

      That said, for some reason I've started (unconciously) running cat5 with rather large loops at the corners. Guess you just get used to it ;)

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:You need this digital coax cable by Drakino · · Score: 2

      I know that glass is breakable, and is somewhat fragile. But his point was that it would somehow pick up inteference on it's own just sitting there being hooked up. I confirmed this with another "Monster Cable certified" tech at another Best Buy. So aparently it's common knowledge with these supposed professionals.

    3. Re:You need this digital coax cable by Jay+L · · Score: 2

      Optical plastic fiber (e.g. SPDIF) CAN introduce jitter. Some brands are apparently better than other brands; all things considered, I'd tend to doubt that Monster is a "better brand", but you never know.

      Search rec.audio.pro for recent discussions of that.

  65. CompUSA by Renraku · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Christmas-before-last, I told my parents I wanted a GeForce2 video card and a stick of RAM for Christmas. Well, they went down to CompUSA, and came back with a video card, 256MB RAM (like I had asked for) also they came back with TV-tuner card, an Ethernet cable (25ft) and a monitor switching hub. We took everything back except for the video card and RAM, and demanded a refund for the stuff, because according to my parents, the salesman told them I had to have the other stuff in order to install the video card and RAM. They were this close to getting my parents to buy software to go along with it. Good thing their budget just ran out.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:CompUSA by Junta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hey, that is reminiscent of my Aunt and Uncle going to buy a computer. I'm over there and they bring home everything they bought. They wanted something that could be used for basic word processing and stuff. They come home with a top of the line system, as well as a CD-RW and Uninterruptible power Supply. They said they didn't think they needed this much, but said the salesman first insisted anything but top of the line was a waste of time, even if they just want word processing, and that a UPS and CDRW were absolutely necessary for the computer to function properly...

      Of course, this from the same class of salespeople who said "if you hook a DVD player into a VCR, the VCR will probably fry, so you best avoid going through the VCR, or else you mught void the warranty and have to get a new VCR..." The floor salespeople at most retail outlets are so unbeleivably incompetent..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:CompUSA by sharkey · · Score: 2

      The floor salespeople at most retail outlets are so unbeleivably incompetent.
      Isn't that why they're working in retail in the first place?


      Yep. McDonald's AND the porno theater looking for a jizz-mopper turned 'em down.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:CompUSA by Tim+Doran · · Score: 2

      Yep. McDonald's AND the porno theater looking for a jizz-mopper turned 'em down.

      Actually, the porno theatre didn't have an opening for a jizz-mopper

      :)

    4. Re:CompUSA by sharkey · · Score: 2

      LOL!!

      Or should I be revolted that you were able to point that article out?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:CompUSA by Daniel · · Score: 2

      The floor salespeople at most retail outlets are so unbeleivably incompetent..

      It sounds to me like they're making sales they wouldn't have had they been truthful and accurate. Is that really incompetence for a salesperson?

      (there's a reason I avoid salespeople at all costs..)

      Daniel

      --
      Hurry up and jump on the individualist bandwagon!
    6. Re:CompUSA by Junta · · Score: 2

      Really, in my experience I only see problems if I try to tape off the DVD. My understanding is that MacroVision consists in spikes in the signal that occur outside of our ability to see. When a recording VCR sees the signal spike, it decreases the recording level to compensate for the apparently strong signal, reducing the useful information signal strength to an insignificant amount. I was under the impression that VCRs only did this when trying to write the signal to tape, but I guess some may do it all the time to inputs. In any case there are special devices (even at bestbuy) that claim to be signal enhancers that simply filter out macrovision spikes, it may be the ticket to get things to work better.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  66. Salesmen? by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 3, Funny
    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  67. Power strips Win95 compatible by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

    When assembling a bunch of laptops for a remote sales force, I got a shipment of equipment in, including about 50 surge protectors.

    They were all marked 'Windows 95 compatible'. This was mid 1996. DAMN I wish I'd kept one!

    1. Re:Power strips Win95 compatible by No-op · · Score: 2

      Wow, I remember those power strips. they were hilarious, you'd read the box and wonder who in hell thought that made sense to put on it.

      --
      EOM
    2. Re:Power strips Win95 compatible by unitron · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you aren't old enough to remember all the speakers and headphones marketed as "Digital Ready" when audio CD's first came out. It involved the advanced technology of slapping a sticker on the package.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  68. I know! by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

    "News for nerds. Stuff that Matters".
    ::dons asbestos suit::

  69. MS vs Korn by xueexueg · · Score: 4, Informative
    I think this is what he's talking about. Pretty funny:

    http://wigner.cped.ornl.gov/the-gang/1999-01/139 6. html


    I've been attending the USENIX NT and LISA NT (Large Installation
    Systems Administration for NT) conference in downtown Seattle this week.
    One of those magical Microsoft moments(tm) happened yesterday and I
    thought that I'd share. Non-geeks may not find this funny at all, but
    those in geekdom (particularly UNIX geekdom) will appreciate it.

    Greg Sullivan, a Microsoft product manager (henceforth MPM), was
    holding forth on a forthcoming product that will provide Unix style
    scripting and shell services on NT for compatibility and to leverage
    UNIX expertise that moves to the NT platform. The product suite
    includes the MKS (Mortise Kern Systems) windowing Korn shell, a
    windowing PERL, and lots of goodies like awk, sed and grep. It actually
    fills a nice niche for which other products (like the MKS suite)
    have either been too highly priced or not well enough integrated.

    An older man, probably mid-50s, stands up in the back of the room
    and asserts that Microsoft could have done better with their choice of
    Korn shell. He asks if they had considered others that are more
    compatible with existing UNIX versions of KSH.

    The MPM said that the MKS shell was pretty compatible and should be
    able to run all UNIX scripts.

    The questioner again asserted that the MKS shell was not very
    compatible and
    didn't do a lot of things right that are defined in the KSH
    language spec.
    The MPM asserted again that the shell was pretty compatible and
    should
    work quite well.

    This assertion and counter assertion went back and forth for a bit,
    when another fellow member of the audience announced to the MPM that the
    questioner was, in fact David Korn of AT&T (now Lucent) Bell Labs.
    (David Korn is the author of the Korn shell).

    Uproarious laughter burst forth from the audience, and it was one
    of the only times that I have seen a (by then pink cheeked) MPM lost for
    words or momentarily lacking the usual unflappable confidence. So,
    what's a body to do when Microsoft reality collides with everyone elses?

  70. Oh, but it *is* true by imac.usr · · Score: 2
    Apple advertises that its machines have "Pentium-crushing" performance (emphasis added). That's absolutely true.

    Granted, Pentiums haven't been commonplace in most consumer PCs for some time now, but there's still nothing at all wrong with their claims.

    --
    I use Macs for work, Linux for education, and Windows for cardplaying.
  71. CD burning for Audiophiles by kuhneng · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember a great article on burning CDs in an audiophile magazine.

    After the expected disclaimers about the limited quality of CDs, etc, they proceeded to review the options for media, burners, configuration options, etc. Then, as expected, came the result of their listening tests. Although the differences were subtle, the best quality was obtained by using the most expensive drive, with the most expensive gold media, set on 1x recording speed.

    The kicker came near the end, where the author noted that "even though all of the CDs we burned were bit-for-bit identical when compared on our computer, the bits on CDs produced with less expensive recorders or at higher recording speeds had dirtier edges, and repeated copying further degraded the quality of the bits".

    1. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's why I bought a bit cleaner. Later I found out I can also use it to rewind my CDs.

    2. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by netik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a problem with your complaint here --

      When you copy a CD you -are- changing the data. I know what you're about to say as a rebuttal - "CDs are Digital, therefore copying a CD means that I'm doing a digital copy, right?" Wrong.

      If you rip a CD, copy the file to disk, and then burn ten copies of that digital File, then all of those CDs are identical.

      Now, if you read in the CD, write it out, read in the new CD, write it out, and so on, you're changing the data, if the CD contains any small errors.

      Due to interpolation (minor error), concealment (larger error), and muting (massive error), the data coming from the CD reader changes.

      References:
      Audio Compact Disc http://www.ee.washington.edu/conselec/CE/kuhn/cdau dio2/95x7.htm

    3. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Joke's on you ;)

      Their explanation of the effect is dubious, but what they were experiencing was variations in jitter and BLER (correctable and uncorrectable errors, and timing variations on pit spacing).

      Some CD players are sensitive to jitter, and some are not: it is quite measurable and produces characteristic artifacts. As for BLER- did you think Red Book CD audio had LOSSLESS error correction? At all levels? ;)

      If you want perfect bit-for-bit identical audio archiving, burn a DATA CD, not a Red Book...

    4. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      Play a PAL DVD on an NTSC TV and you will see a difference. PAL has more scan lines. It won't look right, that's a fact. Its a very important thing to consider when buying DVDs from other countries.

    5. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by ghjm · · Score: 2
      Exactly.

      Think of the Billy Crystal character from The Princess Bride: "It's only mostly digital. There's a big difference between mostly digital, and all digital."

      However, the notion that the bits themselves are somehow "dirty" is still hogwash.

      -Graham

    6. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 2

      Until a few months ago, audio CDs featured error correction codes which permitted to reconstruct the original data stream even in the case of a few errors. The error correction information is not as verbose as on data CDs, but it is there, and if a CDs is not mutilated, it suffices to reconstruct the correct data.

      However, some recording companies have started to deliberately place wrong error correction codes on the discs, to make copying harder.

    7. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by nathanh · · Score: 3, Informative
      Nah - I don't buy this - if "small errors" crept into data burnt onto CDs on a regular basis, half the software I downloaded and burnt would be corrupt.

      Data CDs and Audio CDs have different encodings. Data CDs use 304 ECC bits per 2048 data bits. Audio CDs use 24 ECC bits per 2352 data bits. Audio CDs can degrade if you record/rip/record/rip multiple times. Data CDs can potentially degrade too, but the higher number of ECC bits makes it much rarer.

      My Sony CD player even has "One bit sampling" on it LOL.

      1 bit DACs are clever inventions that avoid the problems with traditional voltage ladders. They are nothing to laugh about.

      Seen on a DVD the other day too: "PAL" like the data is different if your player renders PAL as opposed to NTSC or Secam.

      The coding on a PAL DVD is different to the encoding on an NTSC DVD. This is why R4 vs R1 sites tend to recommend R4 because the higher resolution on PAL DVDs gives you a better picture on decent TVs.

    8. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by mindriot · · Score: 2

      True, but frankly, I don't think an audiophile person would ever be as stupid as to make copies from copies from copies... if you're so overly concerned with the quality of the CD pits that you would spend 1000s of bucks on gold media and burners, you should probably know about the copying process and make your copies properly.

    9. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 3, Informative

      I love all these comments "correcting" the commenter. Anyhow.

      Audiop CDs are written with less error correction than data. It's just how life is. The reason for that is you won't notice a few bits that are off with a music CD, but binary code that's wrong can render a whole disc worthless.

      Think of it this way: ECC is basically a way of encoding data, not unlike compression. With the bits used for audio, you can make up for huge errors but little problems are just glossed over. Data CDs avoid that problem by spending an order of magnitude more bits to guarantee a perfect match.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    10. Re:CD burning for Audiophiles by The+Madpostal+Worker · · Score: 2

      Not really, you could t hink of dirtier as meaning a higher error rate (true at faster burning speeds), more jitter (mainly a function of the player), or physical defects(from imperfections on the media).

      The big point is that they _aren't_ completely identical copies, however so slightly bits do get changed in the copying process. However, you can avoid some of the changes by doings things like using better media, burning at slower bit rates, and using better quality equipment.

      Its the same issue that audiophiles always have. For 99% of the people 99% precent of the time 99% of the equipment out there is suffcient. But should you decide to be picky about it there are differences.

      --

      /*
      *Not a Sermon, Just a Thought
      */
  72. Re:Good point.... by darkonc · · Score: 2
    One of the best examples of clock speed vs cpu speed was back in the 8 bit days, with two entirely different memory access schemes.. A z80 took 4 clock cycles to access a byte of memory, while a 6809 or a 6502 would take 1.

    This meant that a 4MZ Z80 was about the same as a 1MZ 6502 (actually, it'd often be slower because the 6502 was pretty much a RISC chip without the registers). Nonetheless I'd run into people who were absolutely sure that a (1Mz) Apple was much slower than a souped up (4mz) TRS-80.... rong.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  73. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

    Only, he never said it. It's not even true that DOS had a hard limit at 640KB. DOS ran on machines that were not IBM compatible. Xerox PC, 768KB. DEC Rainbow, 896KB. When will you people get it?

  74. College Network Sevices by secondsun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, we do know what we are doing.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  75. NAI Distributed Sniffer Client/server together by fanatic · · Score: 2

    This dickhead salesman sat in a meeting with us, including my boss, and told us we could run this product (DSS PRO for WinNT) with the 'agent' (which captures the packets) and the 'snifview' program (which lets you see the packets and run the agent) on the same machine.

    The first goddamn time anything went wrong, the techies told us this wan't a supported configuration.

    I sent the saleshit the URL for Ethereal, which I'm going to evaluate as replacement for all (or all but one) of our over-priced sniffers. He had to have one of his techies explain it to him.

    But the real question is: how incompetent are your programmers when you can't run server and client on the same machine, but can do so on different machines? Isn't usually the other way around?

    --
    "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
    1. Re:NAI Distributed Sniffer Client/server together by fanatic · · Score: 2

      Ooops - screwed up the URL, that should be http://www.ethereal.com/ . DOH!

      --
      "that's not encryption - it's a new perl script that I'm working on..." - from some Matrix parody
  76. You're the only one with this problem.. Your fault by darkonc · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've mentioned this a couple of times.

    A friend of mine was supporting a group of a few hundred Wintendos boxes, and he ran into a problem where Excel was corrupting files on a semi-regular basis. When he took this to his assigned MS support rep, he was repeatedly told (over a number of months) "It must be something that you're doing wrong because I haven't been able to find anybody else with the same problem.

    One day he was talking to this rep when my friend mentioned that he was talking to person X at company Y.

    "Oh, yeah, he's one of my asignees,' interrupted the rep. "I talk to him all the time."

    "Oh," replied my friend rather acusingly, "then you know about the problem that they've been having".
    (They had been having the same problem for monthes and had been fed the same line by their [this same] MS rep.).

    [guilty silence]

    Busted!

    And for this 'service' we paid thousands of dollars a year on top of the license fees.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  77. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by MeowMeow+Jones · · Score: 2

    When you build the machine:

    Copy rcmdsvc under system32
    cmd
    c:\winnt\system32 rcmdsvc -install
    sc config rcmdsvc start= auto
    sc start rcmdsvc

    problem solved.

    --

    Trolls throughout history:
    Jonathan Swift

  78. OneBox.com by rbeattie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use Onebox.com as my voicemail box. I used to pay a yearly fee to get my own phone number (despite what it says below about a "free trial"), then they decided to cut the "premium" service altogether, but I got to keep the number. Here's a copy of the Onebox Plus page that's been up for the past year:

    We have concluded our free trial of our Onebox Plus premium service and, due to the acquisition of Onebox.com, we have decided not to offer a paid premium service plan to users of our service. As a thank you for participating in our trial you may keep your Onebox Plus service for free. We have deleted your payment information from our system completely and you will never be charged for the Onebox Plus service.

    If you have any concerns or questions, please contact us using the support form in our Help Center.

    Thank you for your participation,

    The Onebox.com Team


    And HERE is the email I just received from OneBox:


    IMPORTANT NOTICE TO ONEBOX USERS

    March 14, 2002

    Dear Onebox customer,

    Through the years, providing you with a reliable, high quality service has been our primary mission. In order to continue, Onebox will begin charging a nominal fee. If you would like to maintain your Onebox account, we require you choose a messaging package that best fits your needs no later than April 15, 2002. Unfortunately, if we do not receive your selection by this date we will discontinue your account.

    If you have an account with Onebox, you will need to register for a paid subscription prior to this date. To subscribe, please click on the following link http://www.onebox.com/service/indexFounder.html . While registering, please update your profile information where necessary. To make the transition easier, your Onebox user name and password will remain the same and all your messages will stay in your account. However, you are required to change your phone number to a new, toll-free number.


    Hmmmmm... What part of never didn't they understand? Bastards. I'd willingly pay them money to continue using my voicemail number, but they're not even giving me that option. Despite numerous emails asking about this, they haven't even responded. Bastards.

    -Russ

    --
    Me
  79. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Nobody will ever need more than 640K RAM!" -- Bill Gates, 1981
    "Windows 95 needs at least 8 MB RAM." -- Bill Gates, 1996
    "Nobody will ever need Windows 95. -- logical conclusion

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  80. Re:CNET News - Interesting quirk by Peyna · · Score: 2

    Just hit the stop before after the first one loads, I had no problem getting to the articles when I did this. (it did forward to the 'expired' page though, btw). If you want to see the content, I'll be glad to grab it and post it here somewhere.

    --
    What?
  81. HP 32-bit thing by Jethro · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish I was home to post this a few hours ago - probably nobody will see this now.

    One time I was at a conference sponsered by HP, Netscape, SCO and Oracle. It was called "UNIX in the Year 2000" (this was in 1998 or something). This took place in Israel. Netscape, SCO and Oracle sent some top-dog public-speakers from their European divisions, all of which gave great talks (even Oracle!)

    HP had some guy from the Israeli vendors.

    He was asked when HP is going to support 64-bit computing.

    His answer: "64-bit is SLOWER than 32-bit! With 64-bit there's DOUBLE the memory to go through, so it takes the program TWICE AS LONG to do anything!!!"

    Yes, caps and exclemation marks and all - the guy was YELLING at the person who asked the question. And he said this in front of HUNDREDS of highly experienced UNIX guys.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:HP 32-bit thing by s390 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      His answer: "64-bit is SLOWER than 32-bit! With 64-bit there's DOUBLE the memory to go through, so it takes the program TWICE AS LONG to do anything!!!"

      Well, he was partly sorta right. If your programmers misuse 64-bit data operands where 32-bit data would do just as well, the application is going to waste about half the memory cache space (at all levels), so it _will_ run much slower. 64-bit flat memory is useful, especially for large databases, but programmers still have to understand what they're doing (and what the compiler will do, how that will impact the processor, memory, etc.) or they can build programs that run slower than they did in 32-bits.

      See the 64-bit computing faq that's up at AnandTech right now.

    2. Re:HP 32-bit thing by KidSock · · Score: 2

      His answer: "64-bit is SLOWER than 32-bit!

      Actually this is true. It is slower. Of course this stuff depends greatly on the programs running but consider a) if the cache lines of the CPU are filled with 64bit values where 32bit values would have sufficed it does use more space and therefore will result in more cache misses and b) most software is written for 32bit processors so undoubtedly there will be compatibitly code executing and therefore slowing things down. It's not "twice as" slow but it's not necessarily faster. Having said that it is possible to write a program that runs just as fast as it's 32bit couterpart and in some cases faster (again, depending on what type of calculations are being performed) if the compiler was very good with 64 bit instructions and knew about the capabilities of the particular CPU.

    3. Re:HP 32-bit thing by Jethro · · Score: 2

      Well, I guess I was somewhat paraphrasing, but it all needs to be taken in context. (A) Is this REALLY the reason HP hasn't switched to 64-bit? and (B) The guy was YELLING at us, for goodness sake. It's just a vendor doing a really bad job trying to mislead people.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:HP 32-bit thing by markmoss · · Score: 2

      Gee, the 4004 must be _really_ fast then. (4-bit micro...)

  82. Well.... by Pxtl · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One in particular that I ran into back when I was a kid - I was picking up a newer model soundblaster from a local computer store. I asked them if it could do general Midi, particularly emluating an MP-401 or a Roland system? They said yes, straight to my face. I mentioned that this was important to me, that it didn't just use the useless non-wavetable midi system of the old SB-16's and 8-bits.

    This was, of course, bullshit. I tried to return it, but they would only give me store credit, and I didn't want anything else from them (mainly they had printers and full systems, very little in the way of parts).

    I also had massive difficulty with the driver disk they gave me, so I mailed the company, and was informed that the card they gave me was an OEM edition specifically designed for use in certain systems, never intended to be sold separately.

    At the time I didn't know this was standard procedure for the computer industry (I don't by anything but OEM, and most of it isn't meant for use outside pre-built boxes) so I ratted the store out for selling me that card.

    Really, I feel kinda sleazy about it - the store was gone within a month, I wonder if it was my fault? Still, they did it to themselves, trying to rip off a middle schooler.

    Whatever, that's the closest thing I know to the subject.

    1. Re:Well.... by edhall · · Score: 2

      Actually, they were right, more or less, and you were wrong. Creative themselves claimed that the SoundBlaster was Roland MPU-401 compatible. You see, the MPU-401 isn't a synth, as you seem to have thought. It's a MIDI interface -- a device for transmitting and receiving MIDI signals from a synth -- nothing more.

      "General MIDI" is a standard (or rather a series of standards) mapping a predefined list of synthesized instruments onto MIDI, and standardizing how they are selected and mapped to MIDI channels. It has noting whatever to do with Roland MPU-401 compatibility.

      I said they were "more or less" right since in fact the SoundBlaster was only comparable to an MPU-401 running in "dumb UART" mode, and even then it had a lot of glitches (lost interrupts and so forth) and required a special cable (that was usually not part of the package). A real MPU-401 had a "smart" mode where it actually queued and timed MIDI events for you, freeing the computer from performing these tasks. It had 3 DIN-5 MIDI connectors (in/out/thru) right on the interface box (which was separate from the card). I still own one (though I haven't used it in years).

      Of course, an honest saleman would have seen your confusion between "General MIDI" and "Roland MPU-401" and informed you of the difference, rather than exploiting it to make a sale. Or perhaps the salesman only knew the phrase "Roland MPU-401 compatible" and was too ignorant to know that your desire for "General MIDI" was an unrelated requirement. In any case, a little knowledge, as the platitude says, is a dangeous thing.

      -Ed
  83. Re:HDD Vendors by J'raxis · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is. The prefixes youre used to using: kilo, mega, giga, etc., are meant to be in 1000s, not 1024s. The IEEE has invented new, stupid-sounding prefixes to mean 1024-units: kibi, mebi, gibi, and so on.

    1000 MB = 1 GB.
    1024 MiB = 1 GiB.

  84. Iomega technical support by curunir · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of the (many) times that I had occasion to contact Iomega's technical support department due to a non-functioning drive, it went something like this:

    Me: My drive makes strange noises when I put in a disk.
    Iomega Rep: Is your Zip drive within 6 feet of your monitor?
    Me: Why yes, it is?
    Iomega Rep: Well, that could be the problem.
    Me: Interesting...well, the cord that came with the drive is only 2 feet long. Should I try stretching it?

    Needless to say, I eventually had to send it back. The one good thing I can say about Zip drives...the one year warranty never expires! You get a new one every 6-9 months when the old one dies.

    --
    "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    1. Re:Iomega technical support by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      Iomega is the worst. When they drop a product, they DROP a PRODUCT. I bought a Buz multimedia box back in 1997 and was very impressed -- excepti with the fact that it wouldn't work with my k6-2. Their answer? "Buy a pentium class system." So I did, you know. The card performed like a DC-30+ for half the cost and i needed a new machine anyway. I bought a dual p2. The card worked -- but not in NT, which is the OS i was using (so the second chip wouldn't just heat the room). The answer? "We'll have drivers with NT 5.0"

      They dropped the product in 1999 for poor driver support -- before win2k came out -- and suspended work on their drivers. Come to find that their drivers had just matured, and the beta "1.3" drivers for win9x were just awesome. There were NT 4.0 drivers, too -- that nobody had except reviewers under three levels of NDA.

      Now, this card is my only SCSI driver. It is useless in 2k, Me, XP...and I've undertaken the task of converting the linux drivers, which work amazingly well, into 2k drivers. It's a pet project that is absolutelyu meaningless because the DC-30+ can be found for a few hundred right now. But I am so pissed at Iomega's disrespect for their customer base that I long to see the now cheap "Buz SCSI card" installed in media labs across the country. It would serve them right for killing a great product with dumb management.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  85. The Win95 rollout by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think this belongs, despite the fact that Bill Gates was actually speaking the truth when he said, a few days before the roll-out of Windows 95, that people needing tech support from Microsoft would never be kept on hold for longer than an hour.

    Yup, it was the literal truth. Anyone who called Microsoft waited on hold, and then, after 59 minutes, they were cut off.

  86. My wife's former boss by lovelace · · Score: 2, Funny
    My wife used to develop e-commerce sites and one day during a code audit the customer asked if the credit card numbers in the database were encrypted. My wife's boss pipes up something like:
    "Yes, they're encrypted with the Murpheson Schmidt 128 bit encryption scheme."
    (For those who don't know crypto, this doesn't exist.)

    In a later episode, at a company party, there was a "raffle" for a Palm III (it was several years ago). The sign said "Enter your business card for a chance to win a Palm III". My wife thought it a little fishy that the company's biggest customer won and her suspicions were confirmed when she later heard her boss (the same one) bragging how he had rigged the contest so the customer would win.
    1. Re:My wife's former boss by rtaylor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure it does. Murpheson Schmidt is very similar to a double rot13.

      --
      Rod Taylor
  87. Glad I kept the packaging by screwballicus · · Score: 2

    "A wide range of programs exist for the Texas Instruments Home Computer"
    - found on the box to my TI99/4A

  88. Re:CNET News - Interesting quirk by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2

    This is quite unfortunate. CNet was one of the few news websites that I really liked to use for reference links because they had a track record of keeping their URLs for stories the same for years. It looks like this is changing now. I hope to replace the links from KMFMS to dead articles with summaries whenever I can find a cached copy to summarize, so those who are interested in the original articles should read them now while they can still be accessed.

  89. Re:Good point.... by be-fan · · Score: 2

    Yea, a 1GHz G4 is just as fast 1.4 GHz Athlon. Great. Too bad that 1.7 GHz Athlons are dirt cheap in comparison to any Apple machine!

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  90. We have a winner! by The+Flymaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    "At the game developers conference, Sun is releasing a white paper on their new "Java Games Profile." Their ultimate goal? To have one CD you could pop into an Xbox, a PS2, a Windows machine, or a Linux machine, and play the same game on them all. If they get full support for it I can finally get rid of that windows gaming partition!"

  91. Re:Good point.... by darkonc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The processors are being sold as things that they are NOT.

    Intel is (for better or worse) the benchmark for CPU speeds these days. Athlon is not selling the 2200 as a 2200mz processor, they're selling it as the equivalent to a 2200Mz P4. In terms of informing a customer of how (relatively) fast their CPU will run quake, this is accurate.

    Anybody who knows enough to build and install a wall-mount CPU clock meter that actually measures the clock speed is likely to know that the AMD really is equivalent to the 2.2Gz Intel. For the rest of us, the AMD rating is both more informative for the average customer, and less un-flattering to AMD.

    For an equivalent to this argument: Imagine if people bragged about what RPM their wheels span at rather then the speed that their car drove at. If you wanted to really brag, you'd get a 1/4" wheel and run it at 2200RPM (a whopping 1.6 miles/hour). One could argue that this is not unlike what Intel has been doing with the P4 vs the P3/athlon.

    Think about it -- they're trying to sell a 1GZ P4 an an entry leve system about a year after the P3/800 was out -- but the year-old P3 (which would have normally been the entry level system by now) would have been faster than the P4 if intel hadn't 'de-emphasized' the P3.

    This is why people came out with the dhrystone, whetstone and other benchmarks back in the '80s -- to get comparisons of the relative cpu power across various CPU architectures for which one-for-one CPU clock speeds were entirely inappropriate (e.g. a 4Mz Z80 was about the same speed as a 1Mz 6502 -- mostly becasuse the Z80 took 4 clock cycles to grab a byte of memory while a 6502 only took one).

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  92. Re:Good point.... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    the 6502 was pretty much a RISC chip without the registers

    *smirk*

    If you dealt with the "registers" on a 6502, this is funny. (ah, the freedom of the 680x0 series... yet the Apple ][ was just *so* well put together).

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  93. Speaking of XBox DOA... by kubrick · · Score: 2

    apparently Jeff Minter's XBox died after a day or so.

    How could they do this to the Yak? (Of course, with his fetish for all things bovine, he refers to it as an Xb-ox :)

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  94. Re:Q: Whats the difference between ... by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2

    Q: Whats the difference between ...
    a car salesman and a computer salesman?

    A2: The car salesman knows when he's lying to you.

    -- this is not a .sig

  95. Back when my amiga died... by danamania · · Score: 3, Funny
    I used to use Amigas exclusively, until I spilled coffee into my A1200, which worked for a week afterwards (cleaned & all) but eventually fried itself not much later.

    After phoning an Amiga vendor in Sydney, I asked about the prices for a new A1200, and chatted about Amigas in general - A1200's were still pretty expensive, around $1000 australian for one, and I commented on the price, also noting I'd been looking at a second hand powermac for a fifth of what he was charging.

    In all seriousness he told me "An Amiga can emulate a macintosh faster than the fastest Mac runs".

    This was apparently true for a few months When the first 68040 Amigas came out, but I'm damned sure quoting it to me in 2000 when G4's were hitting 500Mhz is just a small lie :P.

  96. Biggest Lie by Beatlebum · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Chicks dig Unix Manuals"

  97. CompUSA and surge protectors by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 2, Funny
    Last month, needing a new surge protector / power strip for my TV system, I noticed that the surge protectors in the computer department cost half as much as the ones in the video department.


    when I asked the salesman in the video department about cables i also needed, and he saw that i had a surge protector (different from those in his department), he tried to pitch his units.


    i asked him the difference between his and the ones across the store. "oh, these ones are specially made for home entertainment systems."


    i was intrigued, and asked him exactly how. "oh, the voltage is different, and these are made for TV systems circuits."


    yeah. thanks, dude. now go away...

    --
    mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
  98. Re:Good point.... by Fesh · · Score: 2

    Cyrix used to do that... I fell for it back when I didn't know any better (5x86)... Of course, you see where they are now...

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  99. 640K... by packeteer · · Score: 2, Funny

    is enough for anyone

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  100. The fast computer by steveha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A few years back, my Mom wanted to buy a computer. She asked my older brother what to get. "Don't buy an IBM AT, buy a compatible with a 386." She in turn asked my other brother, and me, and we all gave the same answer: get a 386.

    So she bought an IBM PC AT with a 286 and 512 KB of RAM. "Why?!?!?" I asked.

    "Well, the salesman told me it was the fastest computer they made." Okay, the AT he sold her was an 8 MHz 286, not the usual 6 MHz 286, and that did in fact make it the fastest PC AT that IBM ever made. But any 386 would have smoked it, and been able to run real software as well.

    Not a vendor lie story, but still interesting, is the postscript to this story. After a year or so, the power supply in her AT died. As it died, it fried her motherboard too. We contacted IBM, and they informed us that we would have to ship the computer to them, then wait 6 to 8 weeks, for a repair; there would be no guarantee of any sort on the repair; and it would cost $X00 (I don't remember exactly how much but it was a lot). And of course after all this she would still have a 286 running at 8 MHz.

    We went down to a friendly local computer shop. They installed a new power supply, a new motherboard with a 386SX and 2 MB of RAM, and a new VGA-compatible display adapter. They burned it in overnight to make sure all was working, and we picked it up the next day. Total cost was less than IBM had wanted to repair the AT.

    I like to tell this story when people don't understand why I like my computers to be made from standard, easily-replaceable parts. (Apple's new iMac is cute, but I don't want one.)

    My mom still has that computer, by the way, and it still works.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  101. Re:Good point.... by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    mmm.... AltiVec goodness.

    I think I wet myself.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
  102. Old mother hubbard DMCA, Google delists Slashdot by G-funk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Posted by CmdrNacho on Monday March 25, @06:51AM
    From the "we should have seen this coming" dept.
    Well it looks like our (ex) favourite search engine, Google has delisted slashdot due to a DMCA threat recieved by the scientologists this morning.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  103. I belive that's "buttonholer" by Myself · · Score: 2

    Like the things your buttons go into, that have the stitched reinforcements on the sides?

    Still, a hilarious typo.

  104. DV-in enabled on camcorders by smallstepforman · · Score: 2

    Back in the 2nd half of the 90's, DV (digital video) poised to take the consumer video camcorder market by storm. The pesky Europeans had a taxation clause which added a hefty tax on professional digital video recorders, which would have also included consumer camcorders. The manufacturers disabled DV-IN in order to avoid this hefty sales tax. Australia on the other hand did not have this stupid tax, so most camcorders shipped with DV-IN enabled (just like in the US).

    So I step into Ted's cameras (a big franchise in Australia) and ask for a Canon-MV1 (a PAL version of the Optura) and specifically ask if DV-IN was enabled. "Yes, all our cameras have DV-IN enabled". "Fine, here is the $3600 for the camera". 18 months later I finally purchase a Firewire card, and guess what, DV-IN is disabled on my model. Who do I complain to? It sucks, doesn't it.

    --
    Revolution = Evolution
  105. I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there a description of what flamebait is somewhere? This is really starting to get on my nerves. Seems like I get modded down as flamebait quite a bit. Either there's something to the way I post, or some people's definition of what flambebait is a little off from mine. I'm asking for clarification.

    I am dead serious this is what they said. I used to work for a game retailer. I used to sell those stupid things and the first run of them had a very high (1 in 4) defect rate! Couple that with a shortage, and you have a PR problem. Sony's response was 'The customers are mistreating the systems.'

    I kid you not. I'm not exaggerating, that is what REALLY HAPPENED.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "I couldn't agree more. Coming from an environment where I have to support our software on Proxy 2.0/NT4, or ISA/Win2K, Win2K is loads better. Win2K is stable, compared to the crap that was NT"

      Careful there! You'll get modded down as flame bait! ;)

      Wanna know what's embarrasing? I made a few posts over the weekend defending Win2k and I tried to pull my laptop out of suspend today and it refused. Figures, eh? Had to pull the battery out. Heh I haven't had to do that in ages!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:I hardly call the truth FLAMEBAIT. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Mac is definitely the king of Laptops. I seriously think my next laptop purchase will be a Mac. It's a shame I couldn't get Linux to work on my Laptop, then I'd be *cough* cool like everybody else here.

      I might try SuSE, though. A few people here suggested it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  106. Re:what is the best milk frother? by WasterDave · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure how this relates to blade II, but I do know a thing or two about milk frothers - for cappunccino, presumably? You want a stainless steel one. Put it on the stove to get the milk warm/hot, then put it in the sink, hold the lid on with a sponge, and give it some frothing the milk. I have no idea why ours works so much better than the glass ones, except perhaps that since it's steel I'm not nearly so worried about beating the crap out of it. You hold the lid with a sponge because the milk usually comes glooping out of the hole at the top where the frother goes.

    Dave

    --
    I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
  107. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

    Good cables are *absolutley* necessary in things like, studios :) To a consumer, as long as the impedance is close to what it should be, and theres no shorts a cable is a cable.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  108. Biggest lie I ever heard by MsWillow · · Score: 2, Informative

    The veep of Engineering was a total moron, chosen because he must have been blowing the CEO behind closed doors. Anyways, one day while he was out with a large potential customer, trying to sell them scads of huge automotive engine testers, he was asked "What operating system does it use?"

    He told them, "Word." They, apparently, believed him., as they bought a bunch of them.

    --

    Lemon curry?
  109. Making MS Office Work by andaru · · Score: 2
    I saw a 500+ page book called Making Microsoft Office Work.

    I always thought that the last chapter should be, "What do I do if it still doesn't work?"

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

  110. Scraping cat shit by andaru · · Score: 2

    Scraping the encrusted cat shit from the litterbox will suddenly become a joy, not a chore.

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

  111. Matrox Marvel and Win2K.... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

    The worst for me (personal) was what Matrox did with the G400 Marvel - a nice bit of kit for video capture under Win98. Drivers were promised - a Win2K version was comming - and in the end, they turn the card into nothing more than a TV-Tuner if you want to run under Win2K. Very nice. (grrrr) Win9x was no treat with large files and what not... not the OS for (low end) video editing. When push came to shove, they pointed out it never actually said they supported Win2K - though they sure as hell hinted.

    They "offered" a credit to buy the Marvel G450(?) for ~$250 (about what you paid on-line anyhow) that only did software encoding rather than the hardware encoding the G400 would do.

    May they rot in hell.... Not that I'm bitter, 'cause I'm not.

  112. Best demos? by sunhou · · Score: 2

    Sometime within the last couple of years, there was a similar article asking about the best demo presentations people had given. Basically, a similar question, but from the opposite perspective. Some people had some pretty good stories to tell. I went searching for it a month or so ago, but didn't find it. Anyone remember some specific words from the title of the article so it would be easier to find?

  113. Master/Slave by hasphar · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is from the mouth of a third level tech support from Maxtor explaining why their 20 gig HD doesn't work with their 8 gig HD on the same IDE cable.....
    "Well the Master/Slave on an IDE cable is only a theory, so it doesn't always work.

  114. Improve your BLANK experience by andaru · · Score: 2
    Anytime they say anything about improving your experience with something (i.e., the web), it just means that they want to more accurately target their advertisements at you.

    The assumption being that the quality of your experience with the web is directly proportional to how well they can target advertisements at you.

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

  115. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Hell, go to Lowe's, if you have one near. They sell the "Acoustic Response" brand, which works pretty doggone good for me. Good prices on cable, connectors, and wall mounts.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  116. 30fps full screen streaming video over a 28.8 by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

    connection. That was almost ten years ago. The company set up a demo in the board room that ran the client on the same box as the server (dual PPro200).

    Funny, after we bought it all the support calls worked via pay-by-minute software. Sucked to be one of those trying to do non-nature show streaming video at the time. Ah, can you give us any reference accounts (wicked grins - and a lot of pr0n later...)

  117. One word by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Prey.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    1. Re:One word by laserjet · · Score: 2

      I hear you man, and am praying with you. That game changed my life.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    2. Re:One word by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      No, no, 'Prey' the game, supposed to be the Quake killer, used portal technology instead of B-trees, and was recently RE-announced.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  118. i saw this by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i saw this advertisement in the paper once... it said, 'last chance to send your $5 to '

    so me, being the copycat i am, i did the same in my local paper... in BIG bold print, i wrote, LAST CHANCE TO SEND YOU $5 TO ... THIS WILL BE THE LAST TIME YOU SEE THIS MESSAGE TO GET IN ON IT JUST SEND IN YOUR $5!'

    i got about $750 ... but again, i was also 6 years old... i had a hell of alot of fun with that one.

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
  119. From the Windows 95 install ads by sharkey · · Score: 2

    "Whatever you do will now be faster and more fun!"

    I'd love see to a class-action brought by people who did not pass their kidney stones faster, and certainly didn't have more fun doing so, after installing Windows 95.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  120. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by s390 · · Score: 2

    Expensive home-theater cables are really essential if you're going to get that full theater experience with faithful studio quality sound reproduction from 0-50Khz.

    Besides, all those oxygen-free single-crystal silver mithric-clad super-insulated home-theater cables are keeping my former college ladyfriend happily in 12-cylinder BMW 750s.

  121. Re:Good point.... by starslab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    yes, but Cyrix wasn't conservative at ALL with their PR numbers. Cyrix's numbers were complete bullshit. AMD's numbers actually have a bearing on reality.

    Cyrix's CPUs were both inferior clock-for-clock and did not run as fast as Intel CPUs. Cyrix tried a PR scheme to fool stupid people into buying crap.

    AMD's CPUs are superiour clock-for-clock but do not run as fast as Intel CPUs. AMD is using a PR scheme to prevent stupid people falling into the MHz pit. As far as I'm concerned, AMD is doing 'em a favor.

  122. A Vendor with big blue letters... by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

    When estimating the amount of time required for few of it's consultants to complete a set of tasks, estimated that 6000 hours would be required. (at $200/hour)

    One small problem.

    My boss and I completed the tasks in three days.

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  123. apple :) by Perdo · · Score: 2

    "fearsomely fast Power Mac G4 squarely in the lead as the ultimate high-end graphics workstation"

    "Graphics performance is off the charts

    "The dual 1GHz Power Mac G4 is an astonishing 72 percent faster than the fastest PC on the market

    "The PowerPC G4 with Velocity Engine -- the chip that put supercomputing power on the desktop with the original Power Mac G4"

    ha.. ha haa hoo HOO HAA ha haa!

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:apple :) by ptbrown · · Score: 2

      Don't forget:

      "Run Windows apps as fast as a PC."

      and...

      "Of course you'll be able to upgrade your PowerBook to a G3." (They got sued over that one.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced civilization is indistinguishable from Gods.
    2. Re:apple :) by Perdo · · Score: 2

      I have a nice Powerbook 1400 with a G3, thank you class action. I also have a few LC 574s, with processor upgrades (PPC 603), that I recieved the option to purchase after a class action suit against Apple. My $150 times three machines bought me a factory Mac technicians time for six full eight hour days. One machine never did work, which Apple replaced with a new 5200, with monitor. Apple's promises have cost them plenty, including my loyalty. Now I Post lots of intelligent comments to slashdot, just so I can post Apple flames at +2.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    3. Re:apple :) by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2

      And "Apple II Forever!"

    4. Re:apple :) by Perdo · · Score: 2

      My Apple IIe lasted 17 years... The drive died without a replacement to be found anywhere. I tried and tried to boot it, it booted once more. Into a game I played on it for 17 years, StarMaze. The power went out 4 months later and it never booted again. I made it to seventh level on a fluke. I had never made it past fifth in 17 years of play. I never finished it. I don't think anybody ever did. I found a rom of it, and it played just the same. except the axis contol of the joystick was off. An no joystick has ever come close to the feel of the Mach III.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  124. You need extra shielding for digital by andaru · · Score: 2
    Ever see RCA cables made specifically for S/PDIF (digital audio)?

    They often have triple shielding and claim that shielding is much more crucial for digital cables, when the truth is the exact opposite. You only need the shielding if you are passing through analog audio, where the noise is inseparable from the signal.

    Using S/PDIF over the shittiest RCA cable you can find, with large amounts of interference, you still won't lose a single bit of data in the transfer.

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

    1. Re:You need extra shielding for digital by sigwinch · · Score: 2
      Using S/PDIF over the shittiest RCA cable you can find, with large amounts of interference, you still won't lose a single bit of data in the transfer.
      True, but that's not the point. The fancy shielding is to keep the digital noise from leaking into analog audio and video signals, as well as nearby radio receivers.
      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

    2. Re:You need extra shielding for digital by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

      My SB Live is plugged into my Digital (AC3) receiver right now, using this cheap, old, 25' long RCA cable (thinner than most of my other cables, and it doesn't carry video very well). No troubles. I never lose signal. Run the same cable in analog mode, and watch out for the hum/hiss/crackle!

      S

    3. Re:You need extra shielding for digital by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

      Well, technically the worst is optical video. Any intelligent audio guy will tell you coax is better for digital...you lose no data, whereas optical drops it all the time. Optical cable crimps easily and is full of imperfections. And yet, units with optical digital out are prized by purchasers and touted by the 8 buck an hour "experts."

      This is why it's essential that you find a store you can trust before buying audio components. I test mine by asking them their opinions of the new Bose stuff (utter crap with cheap paper cones that tear and sound quite soggy when compared with speakers half their cost). If they try to pass it off as TOL, I leave. If they show me a set of Tannoys, Energies or Paradigms and mention how they are larger but outperform the Bose in every respect (especially price), I feel I can trust them.

      It also helps if they don't tell you everything you look at "is the last one I got and a guy was just in here looking at it." The guy who sold me my receiver and first set of eXL-16s did that to me, and though I bought the stuff anyway I really resented it.

      Oh, and the dumbest thing ever? Gold plated optical connectors. I confound you all to find a single use for reflective gold plating on the outside of a plastic fiber that channels a laserbeam that never comes close to the gold plating.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  125. Diakatana team to develop Windows 2004 by doublem · · Score: 2


    Diakatana team to develop Windows 2004 (Codename Mordor)

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  126. The Source by waldoj · · Score: 2, Informative

    The advertisement is from the Kansas City Star, circa 1970s. I happen to have a copy here, in National Lampoon's "True Facts: The Big Book." [1] The ad reads:

    "Convertible free-arm sewing machine
    Has 12 built-in, dial-to-sew stitches plus built-in button-holer. Includes 4 utility, 4 stretch, 4 decorative stitches. Built-in blind hemmer-mending stitch. Ask about Maintenancec Agreements. $159.95."

    And on the left-hand side, in a white field, it reads "Built-in Buttholer!"

    -Waldo Jaquith

    [1] ISBN 0-8092-3559-2

  127. Re:[OT] Re:Cigarettes by GlassUser · · Score: 2

    Obviously getting rid of the people with the urge to kill. Because if you get rid of the guns, they will find more, fabricate more, or devise a suitable replacement. And then you'll have a bunch of victims unable to defend themselves against a well-armed aggressor.

  128. I noticed that too! by gfxguy · · Score: 2

    While there is more consistency now, at Best Buy you would look at all the expensive speakers in the computer department, wander over to the stereo department and get something similar for a lot less. The same thing went for audio cables and CD holders, headphones...

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  129. 3 letters: MRE by miniver · · Score: 2

    I've done my time in the US military, and the biggest lie I was told, during my enlisted service, was ...

    MRE = Meal, Ready to Eat

    1. It wasn't a meal.
    2. It wasn't ready.
    3. It wasn't edible.
    --
    We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
    1. Re:3 letters: MRE by miniver · · Score: 2
      Oh, man, I'll give you the not ready part, at least for the main course, but MREs are great , especially when compared to the K-rats before them. I loved MRE's, especially the tabasco sauce. And it is a meal -- each one has 2500 calories if you consume the whole thing.

      Having not had K-rats, I'll take your word on the improvement ... but MRE's made the worst Army mess hall I ever ate in seem positively appetizing by comparison. They even make White Castle seem appetizing.

      --
      We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
    2. Re:3 letters: MRE by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2
      2500 calories per MRE? I have a "Chunky Beef Stew and Components" in front of me, and it has 593 calories. Perhaps you mean that eating a day's worth of these things will provide 2500 cals?

      They're really not that bad - I take them on hunting trips and such.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  130. Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm posting this anonymous for a good reason - I know people who have been fired for even hinting at this stuff publically.

    I work for the largest ISP in New Zealand - we are strongly associated with the largest Telco (who have a virtual monopoly on landlines)

    We have been told to outright lie to customers relating to a number of issues, including

    * Dropping port speeds to virtually 0 on a number of P2P applications
    * Running out of IP addresses to give to paying DSL customers
    * DSL network outages due to extremely poor design - we are not allowed to confirm these until "the word" comes through - even when half the country is without service.

    We have to tell these lies every day - I don't think it will suprise anyone to know that Xtra (the ISP) has a content partnership with MSN.

    The worst part is - half this stuff gets out in press-releases before we even get told at the helpdesk; and we're still meant to lie to customers even when the info is public!

    Despicable if you ask me - I'm leaving as soon as I can.

    1. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by judd · · Score: 2

      People who might like to hear from you:

      - Bruce at aardvark.co.nz
      - Anyone at Computerworld NZ
      - Anyone at NetGuide
      - TelstraClear ;-)

      Seriously, if you are correct, this amounts to fraud, and paying customers deserve to know. If you can rat them out anonymously in the NZ press, you should.

    2. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 2
      Don't worry -- this post had been noticed by Aardvark ;-)

      Looks like there'll be another DSL story to go with the long list of others including: Telecom's Shocking DSL Admission.

    3. Re:Huge Lies in New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an ex-Xtra worker, I can add something to this:

      1) The dropping of port speeds is now a well known issue, but this isn't just port blocking, its also combined with the sheer number of users taking up the bandwidth on Xtra Jetstart, which then results in the low speeds (especially o'seas connections).

      2) As far as I've seen, they're pretty quick to fix the "running out of IP addresses" issue. Of course it should never happen in the first place ...

      3) The DSL network outages are nothing to do with Xtra, they are purely Telecom issues. With exchange upgrades, firmware upgrades, phone line maintenance etc etc, there is no way you could expect Telecom to offer 100% service time.
      (They don't even OFFER 100% service ... bring on the 5 9's ;)

      However, Xtra does still have to "fob customers off" by referring them to Telecom, or back to their DSL modem vendors etc. The helpdesk technicians try .. they really do. They work in an unbelievably stressful environment, and get nothing but abuse from customers and poor wages for their time.

      The Xtra helpdesk takes literally thousands of calls a day (not even counting email communication). They are a production line created to churn through the calls as quickly, efficiently, and effectively as possible. Its a sad thing that complete open honesty to customers, and time to spend on calls with customers appear to have flown out the window.

      I was happy to leave the helpdesk, and was sad to see so many people having to stay there. I sincerely hope their working conditions improve dramatically in time to come!!

  131. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

    Tell me what qualities affect a cables fidelity? (seriously, Id like to know :)

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  132. Motorola "digital" cable box by clmensch · · Score: 2, Informative

    My "digital" cable service (RCN of Manhattan) uses a crappy Motorola cable box that sports a "Dolby Digital" logo on the front...but only provides analog audio and composite video outputs. That should be illegal!

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
  133. "It'd be better if I talked to your boss directly" by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 2
    I'd say the most blatant lie I've been told (by several salesman) is a form of
    It would be better if I discussed these matters directly with your boss.
    Considering that I thought that an essential part of my job was to never let the boss alone with a sales rep, my response was invariably, "better for whom?".

    As a runner up, I guess I'd list, "You can't move into the 21st century without video conferencing".

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  134. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by Animats · · Score: 2

    Actually, I have to agree. Win2K with the latest service packs isn't bad. Stability is good, setup isn't too hard, and it doesn't have all the user-hostile crap that comes with XP. It's better than NT 4, and almost as stable as NT 3.51 SP5.

  135. Caldera by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    Caldera at Networld+Interop in 1997 telling someone that Linux runs on a 286 because the guy was going on and on about his old 286.

    I even butted in to correct him and he insisted that it ran on a 286.

    I decided not to go into the details of the boot.s file, and how it sets up all the protected mode stuff for the 386.

    1. Re:Caldera by technos · · Score: 2

      Linux does run on a 286. It'll run not only on the 286, but on the 186, the 8088 *and* the 8086.

      Caldera's distribution, alas, would not.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    2. Re:Caldera by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Not the stock kernel. Sure - there have been ports to the older stuff, but as you said, that is not what the guy was trying to say. He was standing there with a Caldera CD proposing it did.

  136. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by laserjet · · Score: 2

    sweet sig. I like it.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  137. Intuit workers make our stuff by morcheeba · · Score: 2

    True story: We had a, uh, enthuiastiac vice president. He was helping lead a tour of VIPs, including some government representative (senate or congress) from Alaska. The group went through the machine shop in the basement and the VP told him that all the guys in drafting do is hit a button, and presto, the machines pop out the parts. Never mind all those people standing around who actually interpret the drawings, and break it down into programs for the machines.

    Then, when our VP found out that the VIP was from Alaska, he said something like "as a matter of fact, most of the manufacturing of our satellite parts is done by Intuit indians," and that "they were very reliable and good with their hands". Mind you that we were located just outside of Washington, DC, quite away from Alaska. And had no ties to Alaska. Another VP quickly changed the subject.

    Luckily, I left before that company...

    1. Re:Intuit workers make our stuff by kindbud · · Score: 2

      Never mind that Intuit is the name of a software company, not a tribe of Eskimos...(perhaps Inuit was the name you were thinking of, or did your VIP make a double-gaffe?).

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  138. Biggest lie ever: by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2

    "Microsoft must be free to innovate"

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  139. Re:Licence? since when? by oo7tushar · · Score: 2

    or you just don't follow the licence agreement and don't tell them about it...ignorance is bliss =)
    it's also great when you're just going to make your own version of the product

  140. Pinnacle Micro by 3vi1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember many many years ago, when I was buying my first CD recorder, Pinnacle Micro had just come out with the double-speed RCD-1000.

    Back then, systems were meager and expensive. I wanted to connect it to a PS/2 (yeah, one of those boat anchors) via the Adaptec microchannel SCSI card.

    Suspicious that the setup might not work, I spoke directly with one of PM's salemen. They were eager to talk, cause the drives were $2000 at the time and blank disks ran $25 from them and about half that from other vendors).

    The salesman not only told me that the Adaptec SCSI card was certified to work with the drive, but offered to sell it to me as part of the bundle (with 100% markup on the cost of the card - $400).

    After a month of troubleshooting, the umpteenth tech I spoke to on their support line (not an 800 number, and always a 45 to 60 minute wait on hold before they got to my call) told me that "It's the SCSI card - that particular one won't work with the drive". Then, he did some 'research' and told me of a BusLogic microchannel card that would work.

    So I bought the BusLogic card.

    The thing was still a $2000 coaster making toaster.

    So, over the course of 12 more tech support calls (each with an hour on hold), I finally get escalated up to their head techie, who informs me "That drive doesn't work with any microchannel SCSI card! I don't know where you got the idea it would...." I gave him the names of the salesman who specified the Adaptec card and the tech who specified the BusLogic.

    I finally got the drive working by saving up for many months and buying another (non-microchannel) system ($2500+ more down the drain) to use with the RCD-1000.

    8 months later, the RCD-1000 burnt itself up, and PM wanted to charge me $460 to fix it. They said it was *just* out of warranty. Nevermind the months and months of downtime I had because they had outright lied to me.

    THAT is the reason I will never, ever, again buy or recommend any of their products.

  141. The "Coke Test" by herbierobinson · · Score: 5, Funny

    A long time ago, I interviewed with a company that made electronic cash registers. We were chatting at the end of the interview and I mentioned my best computer salesmen story. Well, they one-upped me with this:

    The salesman had taken one of the few prototypes they had to a demo at a large hotel chain. The demo is going well and then one of the hotel people asks the question, "Will it pass the Coke test?". The salesman doesn't have a clue what the Coke test is, but in true salesman form, he answers "Yes." The hotel buyer proceeds to pick up a can of Coke, pop the tab and dump it down the keyboard of the very expensive prototype... Needless to say, that prototype never worked again. The real amazing part of the story is that the Hotel bought a lot of them -- with the newly designed rubber matt over the keyboard... I gather that particular salesman never made up answers to questions after that, too...

    --
    An engineer who ran for Congress. http://herbrobinson.us
  142. Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 5, Informative

    Advertised "250 watt" computer speakers which weigh three pounds and are powered off a 9V 300mA AC adapter.

    P = E x I, where P is power in watts, E is electromotive force in volts, and I is current in amperes.

    1 amp = 1000mA. You do the math.

    A real 200 watt power amplifier will generally have a power supply with a transformer which weighs at least 50 pounds, and that's *per channel*.

    And they use the term "PMPO" - "Peak Music Power Output". Fine, putting aside the fact that this term has no accepted definition in electrical engineering - let's say that those little Taiwanese-made speakers contain an amplifier with a big bank of capacitors to dump out enough current to achieve 250 watts peak. If the power supply to them is only 9V, the capacitors would never get above 9V. If the speakers themselves have a standard nominal impedance of 8 ohms, then we can calculate.

    A simple application of Ohm's Law reveals that 9V into 8 ohms could yield a maximum current of (I = E/R) 1.125 amps. 1.125 amps at 9 volts shows 10.125 watts absolute peak. And in real world situations, we must include the on-state resistance of all the transistors in the output stages.

    10.125W < 250W. Therefore, they are lying. By a factor of almost 25.

    Wattage ratings tend to be utter lies with any consumer electronics, especially car audio equipment and boom boxes. The absolute worst come from tiny little Chinese sweatshops making brands of computer speakers that no one has ever heard of.

    My computer's sound system includes a pair of Acoustic Research AR-4x bookshelf speakers driven off a highly modified Sound A-5000 power amplifier. B+ to the output stages is 45V DC derived from a 10 pound power supply transformer, and it does produce a solid and stable 25W RMS per channel into 8 ohms, using a 1kHz sinewave driving a resistive load. And that's the accepted standard for wattage ratings of real power amplifiers.

    As a former professional sound technician who has done lead sound for Garth Brooks, Harry Belafonte, and The Three Tenors at such prestigious venues at the SkyDome, I've frequently used 240 watt power amplifiers from companies like ElectroVoice, Crown and QSC to power stage monitors on 5000 square foot stages. I speak from experience that running some of this stuff in your house will make your nose bleed. You're not gonna tell me with inflated numbers that a set of $19.95 at Fry's computer speakers will do the same thing.

    There's no shame in admitting that a given computer speaker system has a rating of 1W RMS per channel, but idiot consumers just buy the biggest number they can find. In reality, it takes four times the power to double the volume.

    Jeez, it's almost as bad as the horsepower ratings on new cars...

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      As a former professional sound technician who has done lead sound for Garth Brooks


      You've got a lot to answer for motherfucker

    2. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Aragorn379 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And they use the term "PMPO" - "Peak Music Power Output". Fine, putting aside the fact that this term has no accepted definition in electrical engineering - let's say that those little Taiwanese-made speakers contain an amplifier with a big bank of capacitors to dump out enough current to achieve 250 watts peak. If the power supply to them is only 9V, the capacitors would never get above 9V. If the speakers themselves have a standard nominal impedance of 8 ohms, then we can calculate

      Not to say they aren't lying, they are, but capacitors can be charged to a higher voltage than the source using a voltage doubler circuit or a flyback voltage multiplier. Doesn't give you any more power but does trade current for voltage. See this page for some example circuits.

    3. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by nathanh · · Score: 3, Informative
      If the power supply to them is only 9V, the capacitors would never get above 9V.

      Two mistakes here. First, you said it was a 9V AC adaptor so the DC peak is ~13V. Second, a voltage doubler before the rectifier is entirely possible.

      A simple application of Ohm's Law reveals that 9V into 8 ohms

      It's not quite this simple with dynamic components (inductors/capacitors/coils). That's why speakers have 8 ohms impedance, not 8 ohms resistance.

      1.125 amps at 9 volts shows 10.125 watts absolute peak.

      There's no need to go to all this effort. You already said the AC adaptor is 300mA at 9V. Sustainable power is therefore approximately 3W. Peak power is an unknown because the internal circuitry could easily store enough energy to give 100s of watts of power, even if only for a short time. Without opening the speaker boxes you can't make any judgement.

    4. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      I've always thought of the wattage ratings as the total consumed power... That is including transformer loss!
      If you think of it that way they aren't exactly lying, just not telling you anything useful about the product.

      Sure they are. Power into the speakers is 9VDC @ 300mA from the AC adapter. 2.7 watts output from the adapter. Now, a modern transformer, even the one in a crappy wall-wart, is gonna be at least 90% efficient. Meaning that, no matter how you slice it, the speakers aren't drawing more than 3.5W on the *very* outside from the power line. How does that make them 250W speakers?

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    5. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Crixus · · Score: 2

      What does "done lead sound for Garth Brooks" mean? Are you a FOH engineer? Did you design the front end or monitor mix? What? Rich...

      --
      Ignore Alien Orders
    6. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Two mistakes here.

      Nope.

      First, you said it was a 9V AC adaptor so the DC peak is ~13V.

      In North America, the accepted definition of the term "AC adapter" is a plug-mounted power supply which outputs a low AC or DC voltage. The reference to AC refers to the fact that it plugs into AC. If you're unclear about the common usage of the English language in this regard, you can see it in context merely by typing "ac adapter" into Yahoo's search field.

      Second, a voltage doubler before the rectifier is entirely possible.

      At least two diodes and at least two electrolytic capacitors. Why not just buy different rating AC adapters at the same price?

      It doesn't have a voltage doubler in it, and neither you or I needs to open it to prove it. Doing so would be only marginally more ridiculous than looking for a flyback transformer in an AM radio.

      It's not quite this simple with dynamic components (inductors/capacitors/coils). That's why speakers have 8 ohms impedance, not 8 ohms resistance.

      Of course not. Maybe you'd like to teach the new Slashdot course, "Differential Calculus for Electrical Engineering", if you think that my ballpark approach, which anyone with high school physics ought to handle, is too simplistic.

      There's no need to go to all this effort.

      Sure there is. I was trying to prove my point mathematically.

      You already said the AC adaptor is 300mA at 9V. Sustainable power is therefore approximately 3W. Peak power is an unknown because the internal circuitry could easily store enough energy to give 100s of watts of power, even if only for a short time.

      Sure. Like looking for a pulse generator and a stack of oil-filled capacitors in a transistor radio. I dunno how they build electronics down under, but around here, we don't add the complexity, cost or unreliability of adding components unnecessarily.

      Without opening the speaker boxes you can't make any judgement.

      Sure I can. It's got a pair of LM386 ICs, held on with dull-gray blobs of solder on a printed circuit board that looks like the layout was done by a Parkinsons patient's left hand. Components will be skewed on the board, held in place only by cold solder joints. You might find it's actually built of discrete parts; I don't know and I don't care - but I assure you that there won't even be anything as substantial as a TDA2002 in them, despite the 250W claim.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    7. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      The voice coils are inductors; there is no real way to eliminate all inductance from a traditional loudspeaker. Planar/ribbon transducers and electrostatics are another thing entirely.

      Oooh! Ionovac, that was so cool.

      It was a speaker which worked (somehow) on ionized air - no diaphragm mass, no inductance, etc... I'll have to dig through my old Popular Electronics magazines; it was on the cover once in the early 1960s and it was a concept I wanted to try.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    8. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      I have just received a suggestion which would allow these speakers to output significantly more than 250W albeit for a short period. Just set fire to them! Does this count?

      Well, since they state a peak MUSIC power output, they must be claiming that will be an energy emission in the form of sound. Light and heat do not count toward that total, I'm afraid.

      If we were to set fire to the people who propagate these lies, then we might achieve their claimed audio output power.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    9. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      What does "done lead sound for Garth Brooks" mean? Are you a FOH engineer? Did you design the front end or monitor mix? What?

      System design and co-ordination; technical crew chief for sound, in particular doing location liason with their guys. They brought enough sound to fill the field - it was up to me to fill the rest of the stadium.

      Garth - and many other big names - have their own guys travel with them to do the mix. They tend to be incredibly picky about having people they know doing stage monitors (for obvious reasons), so if there's any one place they won't trust the house staff or local road techs, it's there.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    10. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      Did it say the speakers are 250W or the amp is rated at 250W? It's all about marketing. Tell a kid you have 500W speakers in your car and he will be impressed. Just don't tell him you are driving it with a 10W amp.

      Feh. A real honest-to-goodness 10W amp is sufficient for inside any car.

      I keep on wanting to build sibilance projectors on the underside of my truck. Anytime some silly home-boy who doesn't know which way to wear a baseball cap pulls up beside me with the stereo going thumpa-thumpa-thumpa, I want to be able to flip a switch and drive a couple of hundred watts of bass-filtered Jimi Hendrix guitar solo right into a collection of piezoelectric tweeters pointed at his car.

      I'll have to get into the habit of keeping ear protection and aspirin in the truck.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    11. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by Shanep · · Score: 2

      Dude, too much math.

      Just look at the power adaptor. 9V at 300mA. Thats 2.7W.

      Try to get 10W out of that plugpack and you're gonna melt it.

      I was tought, if I can remember correctly back 14 years, that PMPO was measured from the peak of the positive most point of the signal, to the peak of the most negative point of the signal.

      Whereas RMS is measured between the 0V cross over point to 0.707% of the peak of a sine wave signal.

      So a 20W RMS amp would be 56.6W PMPO? Which they'd probably advertise as 60W anyway.

      BTW, I agree with you wholeheartedly, Re: your general gist, etc. I hate P-bloody-MPO bullshit. My 30W RMS Sony mini Hi-Fi is *really* loud for me.

      Years ago, I wanted a Pioneer M91 power amp. Awesome specs and 200 Watt RMS per channel. As you say, it was heavy. : )

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    12. Re:Computer Speaker Wattage Ratings by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

      I would be interested in seeing that article... When you find it, how about Slashdotting it??

      Drop me a private e-mail and it will eventually appear in your IN box.

      The Ionovac was (and still is, I guess) the most theoretically pure tweeter ever designed. Hmmm... One of my Celestion (Ditton 44 Series 2) speakers has a mismatched tweeter...

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  143. Re:Good point.... by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

    They sell Macs at Fry's here in Austin, and there are generally about as many, if not more sales droids hanging out in that area than around the assembled x86 boxes. Not that I'm terribly interested in either, but you pretty much have to walk down through that area in order to get to where some of the other stuff is.

  144. Products that promise you to fly by felipeal · · Score: 2

    Like XP or Red Bull (Red Bull gives you wings).

  145. Re:Good point.... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    Accordingo to a friend of a friend, Motorola lost the processor war when they instituted mandatory drug testing among their employees... By the time the recognized the stupidity of that move, they'd lost a number of really good processor designers.

    Maybe the managers were concerned about how the engineers were always discussing doping, and just got the wrong idea. Heh.

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  146. Compaq Lies by ChrisKnight · · Score: 2

    In 1994 the company I worked for standardized on Compaq as their equipment vendor, with Novell as their server OS of choice. Our building had four Compaq Proliant servers. Over a six month period we replaced five motherboards in those four servers.

    Compaq was called into a meeting to justify our staying with them as our preferred vendor. The Compaq rep told us that we were the only customer having this problem.

    I told him to prove it, by tracking the serial numbers of a couple of motherboards for me and showing me their repair history. He said that Compaq did not keep track of that level of detail.

    I'm not sure which was the 'bigger lie', but neither was true.

    -Chris

    --
    -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
  147. From Road Runner Tech Support... by coene · · Score: 2, Funny

    [referring to a traceroute]

    "Anything under 1000 ms to your first hop is acceptable"

  148. Re:NeXT by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

    The NeXTDimension never did the mjpeg recording, unfortunately. Otherwise, you're wrong as hell.

    It has tons of software (which I use to this very day.) You don't have to learn ObjC unless you want to program at the GUI. You can use C, C++ (with your favorite modern egcs), perl, etc.

    It sure is revolutionary. All the geeks I know are getting hardons for Mac OS X.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  149. Everything you require for $8 Mil by hydertech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the SAP guys told our company it's gonna cost $8 Mil.

    Now 2 years later and $17 Mil into it and we could do better with a room full of homeless people with abacuses.

  150. "Our salesman may have lied" by rs79 · · Score: 5, Funny

    1985: a California graphics board manufacturer - I wrote firmware. The products actually shipped with a manual that said "This manual says what our product actually does, no matter what the salesman may have told you it does".

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  151. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

    Its Accoustic Research, not Response. Good stuff. Lowe's sells the Pro Series, and I think their prices are better than Best Buy's who sells the cheaper AR stuff.

  152. Got to teach AMD some geography by XPulga · · Score: 2
    Me: Are you sure this cooler (a CoolerMaster) is enough for this 1.4 GHz Athlon you're selling me ?

    Salesman: Sure, here is AMD's cooler certification page, see, this model is certified for K7 model 4 up to 1.4 GHz.

    Two hours later, mobo, cpu and cooler mounted, box booted. CPU temperature: 85 Celsius. 5 minutes after starting the distributed.net client: CPU temperature 120 Celsius, self-rebooted, CPU dead.

    Now I wonder where in Alaska AMD certifies coolers.

  153. The PS2 can crash by PaxTech · · Score: 2

    I crash GTA3 on my PS2 regularly. If I piss of the FBI enough and there are enough cars and explosions on the screen at the same time, it locks up and I have to restart the console. It's happened to me at least 10 times.

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    1. Re:The PS2 can crash by sunhou · · Score: 2

      GTA3 has never crashed my PS2 no matter how many FBI cars, army tanks, etc. are on the screen. But I just finished Ico, and that made the PS2 totally freeze up probably at least 8 times or so. Very annoying, since a couple of times it froze quite a while after the last save point. It's the only game I've had such problems with, though.

  154. "smart-card enabled dial-up access" by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought a cadre of smart-card readers and Netsign software from Litronic, now known as SSP Solutions, because they promised "smart-card enabled dial-up access" with Windows 98. When I got them and was programming the pin number into them, I noticed that the familiar ***** appears on one of the dialog boxes. I thought "nooo, this can't possibly be what I think it is" and downloaded a windows password cracker that just reads the memory location that contains the contents of those *****. Sure enough, there was my pin number, protected only by the brilliant security of the Windows 98 operating system. After explaining what "smart-card" means to the tech guy, Litronic refused to take the readers & software back, citing a "no return" policy on their website. Needless to say these useless products are sitting in a cabinet waiting for me to find a use for them in Linux. SSP has taken the webpage down that duped me into buying this product, but you can still find the claim in reviews such as this onet.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  155. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Don't you think this is a little over the top, nerd? You need to find a girlfriend."

    Wow, what a witty reply. So what's it like being a graduate of the Bob Saget School of Comedy?

    I can't believe how fast this turns into a "Win2k sucks" thread. The funny thing is that the people that are bashing 2k don't appear to have used it much. For some reason 'changing dns via command line' is an important feature. Maybe it is. But I do the system administration for all the 2k boxes in my office. Once they were set up (easy to do), they were up and running. Everybody is still running. I don't have people walking into my office saying 'Uhh I think I broke it' like they did constantly with Windows 98 or 95.

    In any case, this whole debate is stupid. 2K is a far better system for most of the users in most offices than Linux. I'm not criticizing Linux so much as pointing out that MS was made for the office types. Linux is easily a better server. Questions about which is better to administer seems rather academic, doesn't it? I could sit here and say that Win2k is far easier to administer for this reason and that reason, but I use it every single day! I don't know Linux so I can't say it's better or it's not. I do like that in Windows I can tell somebody over the phone how to do something like change their gateway. No big deal. I've tried to do commandline stuff over the phone before, and it doesn't work so well.

    So put this stupid debate to rest, okay? Win2k is not a bad OS by any stretch of the imagination. Look at what it does do instead of judging it for something it doesn't do that you think you need it to. The average Linux user doesn't have the same needs as the average Windows user. It's hard to imagine they'd both need to do the exact same things if they're not for the same type of people, isn't it?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  156. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by Sivar · · Score: 2

    OS/2 could run DOS and allow the programs to use chunks of memory that would otherwise be wasted, such as the mode 13h graphics memory (64000 bytes exactly). Ahh, I miss OS/2. Good thing we have Linux and FreeBSD.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  157. @Home by TheViffer · · Score: 2

    "Never feel disconnected again!"

    Ummm .. wait a second.

    --
    -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
  158. Your DSL will be ready in 2 weeks by paulschreiber · · Score: 2

    -- Telocity, early 2000

    And it took 86 days to show up. No kidding.

    FWIW, Telocity is now DirectTV broadband. I wonder if they're any better.

    Paul

  159. Re:Good point.... by Hadlock · · Score: 2

    although, i've heard many times before that the simplistic 386 archetechture is vastly more efficent per transistor than these new-fangled 32 bit archetechtures. you might not be able to run 32 bit software on it, but a 386 @ .13 microns @ 400 mhz would probably a) be a great processor for pdas b) swamp the palm market with easy to code for palm devices, AND be compatible with virtually every dos program ever

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  160. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

    When you lose the argument miserably, just try to claim that "both sides are right, there shouldn't even be an argument like this". After all, this is what people are indoctrinated with in school here -- makes a great society of happy, unthinking sheep who would never question dominant religion, be interested in philosophy or -- completely impossible -- devise an original thought and be able to act on it, defend it in an argument, and achieve anything.

    The fact is, it's even in theory impossible for Windows to get a decent remote, or automated system administration -- the lack of design pretty much condemned this system to have all "features" bolted on, implemented by monkeys (because anyone with a human brain would choke on his own puke after trying to develop this), with interoperability problems being solved by constant replacement of everything with Microsoft software, and protocols being replaced by thin wrappers to underdesigned "object model" of COM and its descendants. How recognizably sheepish -- don't try to apply any original thought, use Microsoft tools, and other Microsoft tools will do predefined actions using carefully collected set of interfaces that look like an explosion on a spaghetti factory.

    I don't know, what your office of 17 does -- maybe it calculates optimal duration of the amber light, to maximize fines, commercially-collected with automated cameras. Maybe it makes late-night advertisements for "money making schemes". Maybe it even does something more useful. But very likely, it doesn't need computers in the first place, and it's possible that whatever good it made in its history, is negated by the amount of money it paid to Microsoft. Those money without any doubt will be used to make sure that people like you will never know what software exists now, that is far superior to what they are doing, and will force people to abandon the development of everything but VB interfaces to Microsoft's own software. Because Microsoft can do with bullshit more than anyone can do with bombs and guns. What brings us back to the topic of this discussion -- Microsoft is either the world leader in commercial bullshit, or the company that created most amount of harm using this bullshit.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  161. "AMD chips are not Windows compatible" by DABANSHEE · · Score: 3, Funny

    Told to me by a salesman at a Harvey Norman Store, when I said I can knock together a AMD system from parts at the computer markets for not much more than half the price.

  162. My favorite lie.. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



    "VA is a good company. They care about the Linux community." - Everyone, a year ago.

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  163. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "When you lose the argument miserably, just try to claim that "both sides are right, there shouldn't even be an argument like this"."

    I never miserably lost an argument. It's not a very good agrument when people argue over points that have little relevance to the topic at hand. 'It doesn't do remote automation'. Okay, for that Linux wins. 'Win2k sucks as a webserver' yep, Linux wins. 'You can't even change DNS from a command prompt.' So? What's the big deal? use your mouse. That's the problem with Linux, you can't get at some of the features of it so easily with a mouse. You have to find the right command to type in. Sorry, but some of us think that really sucks. You can use Win2k without a manual.

    In any case, your arguments against 2K, whether they are true or not, don't affect the fact that Win2k is an awesome desktop OS for the average office user. It also excels at being a 3D workstation for artists like me. I've already said that it's deployed where I work, and it works wonderfully. Some of it is for software development, some of it is for PowerPoint and Email. *shrug*

    We paid a lot for it. But I don't regret it. It was easy to install on the wide variety of computer hardware we have, and I haven't had to fix a Windows related problem in ages.

    The simple fact is that Windows 2000 is a good desktop OS and a great 3D Workstation Os. I have a great deal of experience with both, and virtually no horror stories to tell. Considering that I can't afford computer crashes during rendering, that's saying a lot.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  164. Oracle: Unbreakable?! by Sir+Tandeth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This was a very popular and ill fated ad campaign. http://online.securityfocus.com/news/308

  165. Re:Back in the Netscape days, at Staples by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 2
    Myrv wrote:

    In the early days Netscape sold a Gold version in retail which included the HTML editor whereas the downloadable verson was only the browser (Navigator).

    Not quite. You could download the Gold version too, but you were expected to pay for it after the eval period expired. The base version had an indefinite eval period (i.e. it was never specified how long it was) and certain entities like nonprofits and educationals could use it free of charge.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  166. Sinclair ZX80 by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 2

    This 1980 home computer came with 1k (yes 1k of memory) with memory expansion packs ranging from 16k up to a whopping 64k (surely enough for anyone as Bill G would say)

    Anyway the really outrageous advertising claim involved an advert stating that the ZX80 could run a nuclear powerstation (with the advert showing a ZX80 with 16k ram expansion)

    What is really bad is that the ZX80 was notorious for 'Ram pack wobble' meaning that if you nudged the ram pack by mistake....it crashed

    Not witstanding the fact that it would be totally unsuitable for running a powerstation for a number of other factors such as not having a real time os, system unreliability etc.

    I always wondered whether the Russians had seen the advert and tired to use (or copy one) one at Chernoybl...one for the conspiracy theorists.

    1. Re:Sinclair ZX80 by henley · · Score: 2

      You mean a Sinclair ZX81.

      The ZX80 came with 1K RAM, yes. But the expansion pack was only 4K.

      "Ram Pack Wobble" was a classic symptom of the ZX81 also - cheaper connectors as I recall (not JUST that there was no connector as such - just the PCB traces run to the edge of the board - but also the positioning of the board vis-a-vie the case)

      --

      --
      I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy
  167. CD Burning Bullsh*t by IceFreak2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was in PC World in Yeovil (England) about a week ago (I know, I know, but there's virtually nothing else around here) when I overheard a truly amazing conversation between a spotty-faced salesman (correction; sales-pre-pubescent-teen), and some poor shmuck looking to buy a new PC.

    Customer: So this new machine has a CD-ROM burner built in yes? [Gesturing to some off-the-shelf PC with XP Home installed] Will I be able to transfer my music files to a CD that I can play in the car?

    Sales-pre-pubescent-teen: [Sensing a quick sale] Oh no, you can't do that out of the box. You see, the music files that you'll be playing are in MP3 format, whereas CDs that you can play in your car use a format known as RealAudio.

    I kid you not.

    --
    Life is like a sewer; what you get out of it depends on what you put into it...
    1. Re:CD Burning Bullsh*t by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Ha, I can top that:
      I was at fry's(local computer store) a few years ago.
      Me:"Whats the range of this CB?"
      Sales:"What do you mean"
      Me:"How far away can I be from someone and still have the recieve my signal?"
      Sales:"Everywhere"
      me:"uuuhhhh I don't thind..."
      Sales(now exsaperatred with me): "if you are on channel 3, then anybody in the world on channnel 3 can hear you"
      me:"its like 4 watts..."
      sales:"You can bounce its signal off the moon to get to the other side of the planet"
      I walk away, to stunned to even say "you moron"
      true story.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  168. Re:Fluoride is a GOOD thing by Panoramix · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're quite right. Fluoridation, the most evil commie conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids...

  169. Re:How about this one? by pne · · Score: 2

    This is how things probably happen in many companies... our boss has recently started giving overviews of the company's financial situation and those presentations usually contain a page on contracts in the pipeline, with percentages attached. He says you shouldn't try to understand the maths because it doesn't make sense at face value, but apparently in the long run that sort of valuation makes sense to someone.

    --
    Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
  170. Microsoft on NT by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    Better Unix than Unix

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  171. Used Car Ad by ch-chuck · · Score: 2

    Consumer Reports used to make fun of mktng, and one they published was a misprint in a newspaper:

    Used Cars at New Car Prices!!!

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  172. Write Once Run Anywhere by quakeaddict · · Score: 2

    enough said.

    --
    I'm still working on a clever footer.
  173. Re:Good point.... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
    Uh, moron, the 80386 is a 32-bit chip.

    Anyone without a basic (and I mean basic)knowledge of microcomputing is no longer allowed to use the word "micron" in a post.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  174. My Vote - Windows Application Refreshing by hillct · · Score: 2

    In the early betas of Windows 2000 Advanced Server there was a concept called 'Windows Application Refresh' which was esentially a scheduled reboot, which addressed memory leaks and other issues of Microsoft Product Entropy. Thankfully I have not been cursed with having to use it since then. Can anyone tell me if Microsoft is still trying to sell this steaming pile of Cr@p as a standard system administration practice?

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
    1. Re:My Vote - Windows Application Refreshing by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

      I was at a German company that had a few (10 or so) NT 4 servers. They all had a script that was schedualed to reboot at night everyday. And they were running terminal server on them too!

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  175. Re:MHz for MHz? by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 2

    There was a measurable difference, but it wasn't in the order of a 750MHz Athlon would spank a 1GHz PIII.

    The old pre-TBird Athlons were slower at 1GHz than the PIII at the time. This was due to the cache running at 333MHz. When the TBird came out it was significantly faster than the PIII. However, they were pretty comparable, the major difference at the time was price rather than performance.

  176. Re:Automatic Butt-holer. by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    they have to have *something* to surf on

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  177. Y2K! by bunhed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I still can't get over the BS that I heard re Y2K. The best (or worst if you will) was one of my clients was told they had to upgrade their AIX, plus more memory plus a bigger SCSI drive, all total around $10k. I did some research and they didn't need the upgrade. The vendor insisted to the point of threatening to drop support if they did not comply. So I took the president of the vendor company out for lunch and asked him what he was doing. "You know they [my client] don't need to this upgrade." I said. He looks me in the eye and says, "I don't care want you say, I want my money."
    I'm so proud the be a tech specialist at moments like that.

  178. Not all bad... by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

    From my brief stint in the Canadian Army Reserve, I can say that this doesn't apply universally to army food. Canadian IMP's (individual meal packs) are pretty yummy. Even the mac & cheese, which for some reason tends to be a "breakfast", is more edible than KD, and things like the beef stew, chicken a la king, etc. are great! The extras vary widely in quality, from the appalling instant coffee, to the downright weird but quite edible "petit pain" (bread, that's the French label) which we figured would last forever if not opened.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  179. Re:Sun Whoppers by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

    polymorphism:

    assume class B extends from A

    A a = new B();

    Tada!!

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  180. From a former sales engineer. by ProfBooty · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to be a sales engineer, the company eventually changed its policy and we couldn't go to the development engineers to get technical info, we had to get the "marketing" approved version. Sufices to say, the marketing version was dumbed down and totally lacking technical detail. Long time clients weren't particualy happy about this.

    It used to be that they hired engineers to sell the product, spent months training them on the software making you actually learn how to use the software so you could sell it (thereby giving you more credability). Eventually they switched over to more salesly types who totally depended on applications engineering support staff to answer any technical questions. These guys would promise the moon and some of them were quite successful without any real understanding of what the software did or how it worked. On the otherhand, sales engineers like myself were more likely to flat out tell you if you actually could use or need our product other than wasting your time on it.

    What I would find amusing some times about the job was that when you would give a presentation that there was always one guy in the audience who wanted to be a jackass and ask stupid questions or attempt to make you(the sales engineer) look stupid, it was always funny to give him the correct answer to shut him up as the guy usually never realised that you were a real engineer at one point in your life. Kind of reminds me of the dilbert comic where he talks about abusing sales people as it is the one thing he can do in his life where its ok to be rude and demeaning to people(some sales people desirve it).

    On a side note, the reason salespeople act the way they do for the most part is because it works. I always treated everyone with respect, but the salesguy constantly calls you once you express interest to force you to move on it else you forget or get distracted with something else (in sales your job is always on the line, sales is usually the first staff to get cut when times start to go bad).

    If you wan't to get the real deal on anything, go speak with the applications engineer who supports the sales staff, they will usually give you an idea of the true capabilities of the product. Never trust the marketing guy, he will stretch the truth far more than the sales staff.

    Lastly, if you are an engineer who can write and talk well and likes working with people, try sales or applications engineering at somepoint in your career. The money is VERY good. Besides you can always go back to your old job.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  181. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Its Accoustic Research, not Response.

    Whoopsie. My bad. And their prices ARE better than Best Buy. I bought a 6' digital coax from Lowe's for $9. The same cable at Ovation was in the $50-$60 range, at Best Buy & Circuit City it was ~$40. I misremember which brand Circuit City and Ovation flogs, outside of Monster, but those prices are hard to forget.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  182. Adult Signature Required by kindbud · · Score: 2

    In 1996 I took delivery of a $5000 apochromatic refractor telescope for which I had waited 20 months to receive. UPS left it on the front porch of the house in the middle of Hollywood, California, despite numerous red/white stickers Adult Signature Required and the fact that the seller had paid for the certified delivery service. It was insured, so the $5000 was covered, but if it had been stolen, 20 months of waiting would have been for nothing.

    Never trust UPS to follow delivery instructions.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  183. The Lies of Dell Corporate by KosovoYankee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A while back, I was setting up PC's for a small research company. 2 of our brand new Dell's had arrived, but when plugged in, they wouldn't display anything properly. I called up Dell, and they assured me that they were aware of the problem, and that there was a "virus" in the video card of each machine. A "virus" in the videocard, I asked disbelievingly? Yes, they replied. I asked them how it had gotten in there, just to play along, and they informed me it must have been introduced enroute from their packing facility to my office. Somehow, a "virus" had transmuted into vapour and then lodged itself in the VIDEO CARDs of our brand new machines. But don't worry, they told me - there was a patch available from their website that would fix everything.

    Those lying jerks - why couldn't they just tell me there was a driver problem, and I could download the fixed drivers? WHY?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

    --
    - If This Peace Is Fictious, I Shall Destroy It
  184. OO means different things to different people by alispguru · · Score: 2

    The best article I've seen on this subject is by Jonathan Rees - go look at it on Paul Graham's web site here.

    People who say "Java isn't OO" really mean "Java doesn't have the features I like in other OO languages". Please say what you mean.

    For the record, I'm a Lisp/CLOS hacker and I don't like the style of OO Java promotes.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  185. Re:Sun Whoppers by flegged · · Score: 2

    Polymorphism is the ability to treat any subclasses as if they were the type of a superclass.
    eg

    BaseClass[] baseClass = new BaseClass[2];
    baseClass[0] = new BaseClass();
    baseClass[1] = new SubClass();

    for (int i = 0; i < baseClass.length(); i ++){
    System.out.println(baseClass[i].toString());
    }

    --

    "I think he was truly surprised at how little I cared about how big a market the Mac had" - Linus on Jobs
  186. Modem Cable by ansible · · Score: 2

    It might possibly not be bullshit, for some marginal situations.

    Even POTS lines are twisted pairs to reduce emissions and interference. Most generic phone cable is flat, not twisted pair. This leads to a reduction in signal quality. For a six foot run, it's probably not a big deal. For a longer run it might start to make a difference.

  187. "Internet Ready" by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Surge Protectors with RJ-11 jacks to protect your modem are "Internet Ready".

    Belkin, so forward looking.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  188. Re:Sun Whoppers by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

    yeah, you're right. Java doesnt explicitly require templates because of that Object base. But I'm actually in favor of generics because it can clean up code readibility. take a peek at gilad bracha's presentation[pdf] on the topic from last year's JavaOne. Note how the code reads (and when errors happen) in slides 9 and 10.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  189. Winmodems by Glanz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The biggest and most prevalent lie I come across is "winmodems are cheaper"... The fact is they are cheaper because M$ insists on encouraging their proliferation to discourage in "a little way" the use of Linux to connect via modem. if makers all used simple UART hard modems internally, they would me even less expensive than so-called soft modems.
    Another good one is, when trying to order a PC without a MicroSlop OS pre-installed: "It's illegal to sell you one like that." And last but not least this is my favorite lie: "Windows is the most stable and secure OS, so why would you want a blank HD?"

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  190. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "This is not necessarily the case. An application may crash because system calls put it in an inconsistant state or corrupt it's memory."

    At first I thought that was the case. And then I tried to run Netscape on NT instead of 9X... *CrAsH*. Then Netscape'd crash on 2k, altho not as often, making me think Windows might be the culprit, right? Well I have friends using Mac and Linux that both say the same thing about Netscape. It sounds to me that they had trouble making it work right. The term 'Nutscrape' was being used commonly.

    Netscape 6.2 has definitely gotten better, though.

    "Furthermore, an application crash should not make the entire system unstable."

    True in 9x, not true in 2K. I have an average uptime, on all my machines, of at least a week. I couldn't do that with NT, I couldn't get 9X to last more than a day. If you saw some of the BS I put my computer through, you'd be amazed.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  191. Actually... by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

    When the IDE spec first came out, exactly how the master/slave drive negotiation worked wasn't specified. As a result, drive manufacturers had to guess at how to go about implementation, and drives from different manufacturers wouldn't always work together.

    Two drives from the same manufacturer, especially ones built less than a decade ago, should work just fine. :-P

  192. Re:Good point.... by markmoss · · Score: 2

    IIRC, the 6502 took 1 clock to fetch a byte, and the next clock to do something with it. But they overlapped these so most of the time the program ran at 1 clock per byte of program or data. The Z80 could fetch a byte in 3 clocks, but the first byte of an instruction required 5 clocks -- 3 to get the byte, two to decode. And this wasn't overlapped. Averaging out the way this impacted instructions of various length, the Z80 had to be clocked 3 to 4 times as fast to match the 6502. OTOH, when the 6502 was available in 1 MHz only, the Z80 could clocked 8 MHz (twice as fast), if you wanted to pay the premiums for "fast" RAM and ROM... But the real test was in overall system performance as it seemed to the operator -- and the 1MHz 6502 Apple allegedly beat anything else in it's price range. If you needed real power you laid out much more for a fast Z80 system with all the trimmings, and the CPM OS.

  193. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Nobody will ever need more than 640K RAM!" -- Bill Gates, 1981

    Except that it is not Bill Gates that said that, Cf. a recent Slashdot article.

    Funny post anyway

  194. Re:Good point.... by sjames · · Score: 2

    are being sold as things that they are NOT.

    Actually, the numbers match decently.

    Which is the bigger lie, selling a CPU with a number that attempts to give a rough equivilence to the numbers the other guy uses (apples to apples) even though it's bigger than your MHz numbers, or hyping that your MHz is bigger than their MHz even though you know it has no bearing on the comparative performance (apples to oranges).

  195. No Single Points of Failure by Wanker · · Score: 2

    Funny, I always seem to find the "one point" that they missed.

  196. Oracle asks: teach my reps to lie by free_at_last · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Back in the spring of 1999, I had an e-commerce site that was showing promise but needed a more sophisticated shopping cart program. An Oracle rep promised me that if I spent $62K on their iStore e-commerce package, it would meet all my stringent requirements -- and I could install it myself with a little help from a CS student. And if I bought it at by the approaching end of the fiscal year, I'd save $80K, because the prices were going up.

    I sent Oracle almost all of the money I'd saved to start the business. My delighted rep then asked me to speak to the Oracle quarterly meeting of top sales reps to help them get to know the small dot-com customers. He wanted his colleagues to be able to help other startups like he'd helped me. I was hoping to become an Oracle PosterGrrl -- and thus attract investors, partners, and customers.

    I spent a couple days preparing a talk, flew to Boston, and told 400 reps and managers about my company and why I'd chosen Oracle's iStore. My favorite slide was one showing a bungalow and a half -- because I had just written Oracle a check worth 150% of my first house. And I had gotten a mortgage to pay for the house!

    As I talked, I could see some of those shining faces showing more and more concern. Afterwards, an Oracle consulting rep told me I'd really need his team's help because no one had EVER installed the package they'd sold me without extensive help from their consulting branch. He estimated I needed another $100K. I had less than $10K left.

    I flew home with the stunned feeling that Oracle had taken my money with the knowledge that this act would immediately drive me out of business.

    A few weeks later, the prices did go up and the package I had bought completely disappeared from their website. Oracle wouldn't refund my money or apply it to other purchases when it became obvious I couldn't use iStore. And the last I'd heard, my accountant was still trying to get them to reimburse me for my hotel and meal expenses as promised. I wound up selling my company to get enough funding to continue.

    So Larry Ellison, please feel free to send me a check for $62,259. And the rest of you, don't make the mistake I did in thinking that Oracle wants to help you grow so they can profit from a long-term relationship. They just want to devour your seed corn.

  197. [ot] Re:SLASHDOT, HEAL THYSELF. by dagoalieman · · Score: 2

    Why thank you!! Good to see someone out there has a clue about Slashdot- discuss stuff, whatever it may be (hopefully on topic), and allow everyone their opinion.

    I wasn't trying to be extemist or anything, just merely pointing out that there's a group effort for ciggarettes to kill- people to make them, advertise them, smoke them, continue smoking them, etc.

    The crap flood is starting to get annoying, I agree, and the moderator system is getting to be a pain in the ass... Personally, I think we ought to get 10 moderation points. 5 of them for troll/offtopic/flamebait/dumbass (IE weed out frist posts, penis birds, gotse's, etc. Natlie is OK, if used appropriately in context, and is a new one. :)) and 5 positive, to get the good ones out there.

    Then make the metamoderation mean something- a little more careful scrutinization of moderations, a nice form-letter email to those who slightly don't get the idea (IE this flamebait issue.. it was flamebait, I admit, but I thought it added more to the conversation than the flames..), and $rbtl the idiots who crapflood then mod it up. Start killing the idiots out there, let them post AC. ACs are all but ignored by me.

    Of course, any other suggestions to wake up the system are appreciated. But thanks for your support, at least! Glad to see I'm not the only one who wants discussion out there about whatever topics we may roam to, and all opinions accepted (even if I don't agree with them.)

    --
    We don't need no Net Explorer We don't need no Thought control
  198. Re:Goddamn expensive cables by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

    Ok, say Im looking to recable my studio (and I am :), what *should* I be using ?

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  199. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I guess that why all the big animation houses are moving to Win2k...oh wait, there moving to Linux.
    I use win2k, ang its the best OS ms has made.

    The command line argument, in general, is a waste. true Command lines are faster the mouse commands, but as long as you can do what needs to be done(in this case DNS) its fine.
    The root of that complaint is the fact that is something goes wrong, MS GUI's a notoriously bad at handling it, and you end up rebooting. However in Linux if something mucks up the GUI, you can still use the computer without rebooting.
    For you that means if your in the middle of rendoring and your GUI has a problem, you can go to command line, retart or fix the GUI and your background process is still running.
    Out of all the #D workstatins, Win 2k is down towards the bottom. Considering its competotirs, Even being on the map is a good thing.

    FYI I've installed several differnet Linux distros on wildly different PC, never had a problem.

    However, if I did 3d rendering, or any CPU intensive work, it would be nice to be able to recompile it specifically for the processor and machine config I'm using.

    Initial money is really irrelevent to WIN2k/Linux discussions, however, the money your going to keep spending to stay with the MS sofware is something that needs to be addressed by any company, perferable annually.
    Only in the MS world would 2 years with an OS be considered "a great deal of experience".

    I've been using Linux for years, and I've never had to fix a windows related problem!

    Just a little levity in case this post seems to critical.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  200. Re:You shoulda tried Windows 2000 then. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    " guess that why all the big animation houses are moving to Win2k...oh wait, there moving to Linux."

    This is a hard number to quantify. The really big movie studios are using Linux for the network rendering. Let me reemphasize this, NETWORK RENDERING. This is not the same as actually developing the animation. I think Final Fantasy was mostly developed on Macs and PCs, and sent off to the Linux farm for rendering. This doesn't negate what you're saying, but rather it indicates that OSX and Win2k are useful in this area. It is my understanding that the animators are given the OS they know how to use. It also costs $12,000 per seat to get Maya. Interestingly enough, the desktop machines did rendering overnight as well. (This might have been Shrek.. I watched the making of on both these movies too close together...)

    That's a little prohibitive for a medium sized Game Company or Television FX studio. The majority of these two businesses use either 3D Studio MAX or Lightwave. Neither of these two progams are available in Linux. If Win2k was as bad as some of the people here believe, then these companies would sooner buy Maya seats than rely on Win2K to handle their rendering.

    Getting back to the topic at hand, MS promised greater stability with Win2k, and they easily delivered that. That's the only point I'm trying to make, if you sift back to the top of this thread, heh.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  201. Re:Forgetting hte most important one by vladkrupin · · Score: 2

    ...which is true. (or do you need Win95?)

    yeah, the comment is lame. I just wanted to join in and tell you that I am exceptionally amused by your logical conclusion.

    --

    Jobs? Which jobs?
  202. Directional? by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    Directional, shmectional. The only time directional matters is when you're hooking up sewer pipes. Shit rolls downhill.

    In an audio system, you're dealing with AC in your signal lines, and in AC you don't have electrons flowing from point A to point B. It's more of an oscillation. That means the electrons are going both directions.

    If you've got a cable that "sounds better" in one direction than the other, you don't have a cable, you have a diode. But more likely you have a weak connection somewhere.

    As for "oxygen free" or gold-plated connectors, all that does is tell your friends "look how much money I have to waste." An audiophile friend of mine made speaker cables out of TELEPHONE WIRE and they sound just as good as the thousand-dollar-a-foot-silver-wire-blah-blah cables the golden-fleece store wanted to sell him. And he's got a golden ear.

    Someone mentioned the Belkin gold-plated telephone line cord for your modem. Granted, the gold-plated isn't going to do a lot for you, but the cord DOES have twisted-pair inside (the grey flat line cord doesn't). The twisting resists electrical interference, and there's a lot of it in the rat's nest behind your computer. Of course, this only benefits you if your premises wiring is twisted pair AND the telco wiring down the street is, too. I have seen it make a difference.

    A gold plated sewer pipe doesn't make your shit smell any better. ;-)

    Onto another rant, why does a stinkin' Belkin USB cable cost 20 bucks? Anyplace that sells Belkin seems to only sell Belkin, and that's anyplace that is a chain. I go over to my hole-in-the-wall screwdriver shop and they've got a no-name cable that's just as good for 6 bucks. What's up with that?

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  203. speaker ratings, not amplifier ratings by unitron · · Score: 2
    What that number means is that the speakers can withstand 250 Watts for about one-millionth of a second. Any longer than that, of course, and the voice coil vaporizes. :-)

    Amplifiers are often misleadingly advertised as well. I used to sell consumer audio stuff back in the '70s and trying to explain to the non-technically minded the differences between peak, peak to peak, instantaneous peak to peak, RMS, IHF, peak music power, and the acronym of the week was a major occupational hazard.

    By the way, that's RMS as in root-mean-square, not that other RMS. Trying to explain him to potential customers would have been an adventure I'd just as soon have done without.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  204. Re:How may cpus do you want by dublin · · Score: 2

    Well, actually, this is pretty darn close to the truth for applications that are threaded. IIRC, Oracle ran about 28x as fast on a 30-way UE6000 as it did on a single processor of the same speed. (To be fair, there are darn few apps that are really written to take advantage of threading, Oracle is one of the best...)

    I know this is hard for some Linux folks to swallow, but that's the reason some of us really love Solaris - it scales more linearly that anything else I've encountered. It's not exactly linear, but for well-written apps, it's pretty close...

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  205. Digital Cameras by Webmoth · · Score: 2

    I had a camera store salesman tell me that JPEG is higher quality than TIFF, and why would I want to use TIFF, it just takes up more space on the memory chip?

    This salesman is an accomplished photographer. Any questions on traditional film photography he can answer correctly. He's a valuable resource in that respect. But when it comes to computers and digital photography, he is absolutely clueless.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  206. Finally! An Easy To Configure Router! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

    But it would be interesting to see if you can see my comp through the router because according to the manual the way I have it setup should prevent you from contacting my machine directly.

    Hey Tom. I know the manual you're talking about. It's the roughly-translated-from-the-Taiwanese manual on waxy paper which was packaged with your router when you bought it at Network Supply on Colonnade.

    Yeah, big companies spend millions of dollars a year attempting to hack-proof their infrastructure, but I-can't-pronounce-it-in-English-Router-Company-of- Taipei has come up with a remarkably easy-to-configure router:

    "Router have two mode: USEFUL an SECURE. On front panel adjacent to power switch, please to find large chrome toggle switch and turn it to whichever direction serves your needs. This conclude security configuration instruction. Enjoy meditation: Blade of grass that bends with wind will bring thousand happiness to potter who also breeds chickens. Thank you and best wishes from I-can't-pronounce-it-in-English-Router-Company-of- Taipei."

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  207. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I can crash win2k with edit.
    repeatably.
    No OS should ever go down because an application crashes. Ever.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  208. Re:Uh, he is running windows. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "I can crash win2k with edit."

    Sounds like you have a shitty computer. You really shouldn't buy a Compaq and then blame Windows for it being unstable. ;)

    Meanwhile... my computer, which has been up for well over a week, is running Lightwave (Both LW Apps: Layout and MOdeler), Photoshop with an image I haven't saved yet, Opera which is not really all that stable (still tolerable, though...) Winamp, Kazaa, Outlook, and all on a Dual Monitor setup.

    Sounds to me that Windows 2000 is doing pretty damn good. Could Linux do better? Perhaps. That's not the focus of this debate. The debate was that MS said that Win2k provided greater stability. It did. Case closed. You cannot argue that it didn't. It's over. I win.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  209. Not how it's advertised and S/PDIF won't interfere by andaru · · Score: 2
    It is advertised to protect the pristine cleanliness of your perfect digital signal.

    Anyway, interference problems in your analog cables are much more likely to come from cables which are carrying some real power. S/PDIF doesn't transfer any power for devices, just signal (which, on the wire, would be a low power analog signal putting out no more interference than an RCA cable carrying a line level). So if you needed shielding to prevent your digital signal from interfering on your analog cable, you would need just as much shielding to prevent your analog signal from interfering with other analog cables.

    --

    Why is Grand Theft Auto a much more serious crime than Reckless Driving?

  210. Re:Not how it's advertised and S/PDIF won't interf by sigwinch · · Score: 2
    It is advertised to protect the pristine cleanliness of your perfect digital signal.
    That's just silly. As long as you operate your microwave oven with the door closed, there won't be much problem.
    S/PDIF doesn't transfer any power for devices, just signal (which, on the wire, would be a low power analog signal putting out no more interference than an RCA cable carrying a line level).
    I haven't read the specification, but it probably carries an approx. 2.4MHz digital signal. Which means it will have significant sinewave harmonics out to 10-20MHz. Which means that a single poorly soldered connection at an RCA connector can screw up radio and TV reception, even if it still seems to work.

    That's for the good stuff. If the equipment is poorly designed, it could easily have digital noise and harmonics out to hundreds of MHz. If you've done much entertainment center stuff, you've probably come across a cheap CD player or similar that screws up TV reception--I've come across several. Hostile equipment like that is why I recommend using good coax cables for digital. (Good doesn't necessarily mean expensive, but I try to avoid the cheapest cables.) It's far easier to prevent noise problems than it is to diagnose and fix them after they occur.

    --

    --
    Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)