Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.1 Alpha1 is Here

navindra writes: "A brand new alpha of the breath-taking KDE 3.1 development branch has been announced. This release sports everything from wonderful new eye candy to tons of popular new features including new and exciting "easter eggs" (aka bugs) just waiting to be discovered. Remember, this is not a stable release -- those of you concerned with stability should use KDE 3.0.2, whereas those of you who want to help KDE 3.1 be the best KDE ever should use this alpha. Kudos to Dre for writing the announcement and to the tireless Dirk Mueller for coordinating this release. Party!" On a related note, pAlpha writes: "Over the past years a large amount of myths has built up around KDE. Recently Aaron J. Seigo released a page about the KDE myths and facts." Good for convincing the boss.

432 comments

  1. Maybe but I doubt it by sheepab · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can they improve upon the best? Honestly....can they?

    1. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by sheepab · · Score: 2

      I think the moderators took that wrong, or I posted it wrong, what I MEANT was that KDE 3.0 already kicks major ass, and here we are with 3.1 I just dont see how the best can get better.

    2. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 4, Informative
      I just dont see how the best can get better.

      At this point, at least for the 3.x series, it's mostly 'tweaks' for improved useability, more standards compliance, and so on.

      I update my copies of the current KDE CVS a few times per week, though I only occasionally compile and install from there (once every few weeks). I just like to watch what's being updated.

      Last few times I updated the core KDELIBS CVS, for example, I noticed more updates to the html and ecma/javascript code. KMail has had a lot of individual updates...you get the idea. I can't honestly say I know how SUBSTANTIAL the changes have been, but I can at least spot when a section that I use frequently has had updates. so that if I get curious or run into problems in that area (something that hasn't happened to me in some time) I know to try an update...

      I notice a bunch of the less "core" utilities (e.g. K3B, the video transcoding utility) have been moved from the core libraries to a new area ("KDEEXTRAGEAR", if I remember correctly). I need to check out that module too, now...

    3. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by josh+crawley · · Score: 2

      "I think the moderators took that wrong,"

      Don't fret. The editors (for the most part) are morons.

      "or I posted it wrong, what I MEANT was that KDE 3.0 already kicks major ass, and here we are with 3.1 I just dont see how the best can get better."

      It graphically rocks. However, it also sucks balls. All these people that says that X-WIndows is sucky and such.... Well, window managers like this are your problem. KDE uses non-standard messages to the X-server and therefore slows down overall performance. Look at TWM. With basic apps, it's tremendously fast, even on a 233 p2. YOu could add in gtk+ and still have it snappy.

    4. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      I use KDE 3.1 at home on my Slack 8.1 box... I must say that it is the best GUI that I have ever used. I would have never expected it to become so nice. Not only is it pretty (very), but it is fast and full of features and configurability. I don't intend to do any major updates to my box, but it looks like I can expect some excellent new features and imporvements next year.

    5. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      I meant to say that I use 3.01, not 3.1.

    6. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 2
      on a vanilla Red Hat 7.3 install

      There's your problem. Red Hat does everything they can to *not* support KDE on their distro. Use one which works better.

      I ran KDE on RedHat and Mandrake for years. Recently, I moved to Debian, and what is nominally the same release of KDE runs at literally twice the speed.

    7. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confucius say virginity like balloon--one prick, all gone.
    8. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      lets take it point by point:

      * I don't see it getting crashed. If you can compile KDE 3.1 alpha - please do, and report crashes to bugs.kde.org
      * try to run your app with artsdsp: artsdsp xmms
      * you can compile kdebinding and switch from KHTML to KMOZILLA on the same window - it's in the "View" menu on Konqueror
      * if you want to look like XP - please give more details.

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    9. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Karn · · Score: 1

      Yeah, everyone knows how much Redhat hates KDE.

      *sigh*

      I just love conspiracy theorists.

      --


      Why do I keep typing pythong?
    10. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I update my copies of the current KDE CVS a few times per week, though I only occasionally compile and install from there (once every few weeks).

      Aha! No wonder the Net keeps getting slower...

    11. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Okay Okay I took a look at the drop shadow screenshot, and they still have that ONE last annoying feature that prevents me from switching:
      the dotted line at the end of the menus. Honestly, we don't need it. Get rid of it.
      Everything else in KDE looks so well put together (could give Aqua some seeerious competition) but aesthetically speaking, the end dash somehow always appears to be abruptly cut off.
      ANd honestly I think Linux users in general know where their menus are supposed to end :-)

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    12. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the tear-off handle? This can be turned off with "InsertTearOffHandle=false" in kdeglobals since uhm 3.0?

    13. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by redtuxxx · · Score: 0

      Easy - here

    14. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well next time you'll try to write a longer sentence rather than a quick post to try increasing your kharma.

    15. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

      Actually, xmms comes with an Arts output plugin. Has for a while. Works great.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    16. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      The "dotted line" is a button to tear off the menu, one of the best features.

    17. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by CameronGary · · Score: 1

      Sweet! Thanks so much. RealPlayer can play sounds now . . . That had stopped working when I switched to the I810_audio driver for my onboard sound.

    18. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Decrease memory usage. Speed it up.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    19. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      My bad...I guess I was looking for 'Dotted line' in KDE's Control Center

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    20. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Jungle+guy · · Score: 1
      I would love to have an easier way to install new fonts in KDE.

      It would also be sweet to have a bettr integration with Mozilla, in a a way that, once a font is OK in KDE, it would also be installed for Mozilla.

      A bit of code optimization, to make the desktop faster and more stable, would also be great.

    21. Re:Maybe but I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I would love to have an easier way to install new fonts in KDE.

      What's wrong with the font installation control center module of KDE 3.0?

  2. Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This means that KDE 3.0 is going to roll out on Debian in the next six months. I just can't wait!

  3. I would just...... by Kwikymart · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I would just like to thank /. for their amazing ability to link to pages with high resolution images knowing fully that the hosting server will be slashdotted in a number of seconds.

    --

    Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    1. Re:I would just...... by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      How about a new /. feature that only provides links for people that are logged in and have posted at least one message in the last week.

      Of course the screen shot is only of some new drop shadow support for menus. It's kinda funny that so many geeks are trying desperately to view a darkened border of a couple pixels around a menu.

    2. Re:I would just...... by navindra · · Score: 1

      It works, just have to be patient. Bumped MaxClients up to 400 but doubt that'll be enough. Whee!

    3. Re:I would just...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a new /. feature that only provides links for people that are logged in and have posted at least one message in the last week.

      And I bet your same non-handicaped dude that uses the wheelchairs at disneyworld... geeze.. be patient!

    4. Re:I would just...... by pjt48108 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Why not a cache server for linked sites?

      --
      Mmmmmm... Bold, yet refreshing!
    5. Re:I would just...... by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      Offtopic? Maybe. But certainly germane. The pictures *are* pretty, though. Makes me want to try Gnulix again, almost. I keep forgetting all the damned headaches. Pie in the sky in my opinion. The pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. You get my drift.

      Go moderate yourself.

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    6. Re:I would just...... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Asked and answered. Can we have less of the metaSlashdot discussions please? :)

      --
      I do not have a signature
  4. KDE keeps getting better by cxvx · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've been using the cvs version ever since I heard that konqueror supported tabbed browsing :)
    Now I'm no longer using mozilla, since it doesn't start quite as fast as konqueror and the tabs where the only thing better about it (that and the antialiased fonts in konqueror look much better).

    There are lots of (small) improvements in the kde code that make the whole environment a real joy to use.
    Kde 3.1 is a great thing to look forward for.

    --
    If only I could come up with a good sig ...
    1. Re:KDE keeps getting better by 1010011010 · · Score: 2


      Konq does look better than Mozilla. The version of Konq in KDE 3.0 is slooow, though. Slower than Mozilla. I have an Athlon 600, 256MB of RAM. Amazingly, Mozilla opens new windows faster than Konq, and seems to use less memory. I remember when the opposite was true.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:KDE keeps getting better by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      Hmm that seems very strange. I have kde 3.x configured on a fair number of boxes and I have found konqueror to be faster to start then mozilla and open new windows by a lot. One of the boxes is running kde 3.0.2 on debian sid with a k6-2 350 and 384M of ram. On another box I have a athlon xp1800+ with 1G of ram and konqueror is way faster then mozilla. It starts in 1s and new windows open with no delays.

      When I have checked memory usage I have also found that mozilla uses more memory then konqueror does What I wonder about is that if the packages you are using have not been made very well.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    3. Re:KDE keeps getting better by cxvx · · Score: 1

      Never noticed similar problems.

      But maybe I'm not the right person to judge performance since my main box is a dual athlon 1800 with 512mb ram :).

      But even on my laptop(PIII 600/192MB, slow HD) konqueror loads in a second.
      I find KDE3 performing a lot better then 2.2. It could be a distro thing however. I switched from mandrake to gentoo and since then everything seems much faster.

      --
      If only I could come up with a good sig ...
    4. Re:KDE keeps getting better by Hassan79 · · Score: 1

      It's the dynamic linking of C++ applications on Linux that makes KDE so slow. Here is a discussion and some links about it.

      --

      Don't drink and su! antidisestablishmentariazationally
    5. Re:KDE keeps getting better by cxvx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know, but the binutils 2.12 solves part of the linking problem by prelinking.

      Just today, the objprelink programmer, Leon Bottou, posted on the kde-dev mailinglist, stating that the objprelink option is no longer necessary. When using the newest glibc, binutils and gcc, you already get large speedups.

      You can find more info on objprelink here.

      --
      If only I could come up with a good sig ...
    6. Re:KDE keeps getting better by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      I agree. I currently use kde 3.0.2, but as soon as the final version comes out I'll emerge it in.

    7. Re:KDE keeps getting better by s2r · · Score: 0

      Is there any plug in for gnupg in Kmail?
      If not I would stick to mozilla + enigmail.

    8. Re:KDE keeps getting better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gnupg support is built into Kmail.

      It's okay, but nothing compares to mutt's gpg functionality.

  5. Mmmm... by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    Mmmm... Eye candy and easter eggs...

    (drools)

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  6. not to be a wet blanket, but... by krog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...is Slashdot the place for alpha announcements?

    i'm sure there are plenty of KDE fans here and all, but this isn't even beta yet. if Slashdot announced every alpha release of every decent-sized Open Source project... Oh wait, they do.

    1. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my thoughts exactly. it's not only needless to point a geek stampede at an alpha release, it's irresponsible. let the programmers hammer out some bugs and go to at least beta before sending hordes of stinky nerds to the mirrors.

      alpha software can really do a number on your machine.

    2. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      yes.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    3. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an excellent point, especially when it's KDE, a cheap OS X ripoff that hasn't even been done well.

    4. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Soko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ummm... Hi there.

      You do realise that /. is frequented by folks who know what "it's an Alpha version" means, yet will still download and try it? Ya, them "geek" types.

      There's a lot of these folks here, too. This translates to lots of knowlegeable, quailty testers for the KDE team. Quality testers == a quality product for the rest of us. Knowlegeable testers == help for the KDE people in fixing bugs. /. therefore does the community a service when they announce new developments on major OSS projects, by pointing the right eyes to the source code.

      BTW, I think it's cool that the only major browser without tabs after KDE3.1 is released will be IE. The Galeon folks should be proud.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    5. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by josh+crawley · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "You do realise that /. is frequented by folks who know what "it's an Alpha version" means, yet will still download and try it? Ya, them "geek" types."

      Then please explain why (before Slashdot was commercialized) that the _public weblogs_ said that roughly 90% of the users was viewing slashdot through WIn(X ver) on IE ?

    6. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by krog · · Score: 1

      You do realise that /. is frequented by folks who know what "it's an Alpha version" means, yet will still download and try it? Ya, them "geek" types.

      for every one of those, there's five who don't know their ass from their elbow.

      or, to put it less flamaciously, the geeks who knows and care what an alpha release is should check NewsForge for announcements like this. NewsForge is a generally higher-level forum for this sort of thing.

    7. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The Galeon folks should be proud.
      Somewhere in Norway a man is crying.
    8. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      From my experience - I had installed Red Hat 7.3 with KDE 3.0 and I used it, but I missed the tabbed browsing (I open about 16 tabs on Konqueror on avrage) so I compiled KDE 3.1 Alpha and I'm using it already for about a week.

      My impression so far - stable as a rock already! I removed my old KDE 3.0 RPMS and getting all my stuff with KDE 3.1 alpha - and it works! didn't see any crashes so far..

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    9. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is news for nerds: I can understand them announcing the Alpha Releases, its the production release announcements I don't get get.

    10. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1
      BTW, I think it's cool that the only major browser without tabs after KDE3.1 is released will be IE. The Galeon folks should be proud.
      IE itself does not provide tabs, but if you want them (and a popup filter) for IE check out the Crazy Browser.
    11. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps most have modified their browser ID strings to get into sites designed by idiot webmasters that check for browser IDs instead of just following the standards.

      yes, it is that easy.

    12. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1
      Then please explain why (before Slashdot was commercialized) that the _public weblogs_ said that roughly 90% of the users was viewing slashdot through WIn(X ver) on IE ?
      I am one of those (IE 6 on XP), and though I don't use Linux, I enjoy reading about improvements of KDE (including Alpha Releases).

      I'd like to use Open Source everywhere, yet there are still too many things that I can use under Windows only. Plus, I don't think Linux is ready for the desktop. It will never be. Otherwise it wouldn't be Linux anymore. To make a good Open Source operating system for the masses, everything you will include into this operating system (distribution) would have to developed after common standards - it has to look and feel like ONE product. And that's just impossible with Linux as we know it today. But I don't think any Linux zealot will admit that. Right?

      Yet, after all, I think Linux (the kernel) and KDE are both technically great products. And I love to see what people can create if they only want to.
    13. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      I can't explain away everything but.. consider that many view slashdot from work.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    14. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0

      How did KDE go from a cheap Windows ripoff to a cheap OS X ripoff in a matter of five years?

      --

      IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
    15. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by mandolin · · Score: 2
      is Slashdot the place for alpha announcements? (...) if Slashdot announced every alpha release of every decent-sized Open Source project.. Oh wait they do.

      Not to be glib, but I believe you just answered your own question.

    16. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because many geeks take advantage of leased lines at work/school/university where they are (sadly) invariably forced to use Windows.

    17. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Desktop = Windows?? With that definition of course you'll reach the conclusion (which is the premise anyway)....

      Also, under Linux most things are developed after common standards unlike Windows, which are propietary non-standards.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    18. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Darby · · Score: 1

      I'd like to use Open Source everywhere, yet there are still too many things that I can use under Windows only.

      Not arguing with you, not flaming, just curious:
      Besides games, like what?

    19. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Soko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I haven't used Opera in a while, but IIRC it had an MDI interface, not true tabs.

      Apologies if I was mistaken.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    20. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is because 3.1 is chiefly about fixing bugs. Most of the features and apps which are in this alpha were originally slated for 3.0 but didn't quite make the cut. Thus, this alpha is more mature than many betas.

    21. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by askii64 · · Score: 0

      Opera 6 can be used in MDI mode, or SDI mode with the option of using tabs to browse with. It works nicely too, but I tend to not use it, as it doesn't seem too well integrated yet into the system.

      --

      -This quite possibly mangled, stupid, demented comment was brought to you by Askii64.
    22. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense, almost all new was developed since 3.0. Perhaps it's so stable because development branching just occured after 3.0 in opposite to Gnome 2.0 afaik?

    23. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by andrewscraig · · Score: 1

      For me it is mostly Internet Explorer that I need due to poor standards - for example, I need to log into NTLM authenticated websites, which mozilla & konq just blow a gasket at, and our time management program uses some extensive ActiveX components so that non IE browsers get a blank screen (if I force the browser string to emulate IE).

      This is why VMWare is good!!

    24. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

      How about decent graphics packages and page layout tools? Don't give me the lowdown about latex or Gimp. I know.. but Gimp is a far cry from what Photoshop 6 is, and using Quark XPress, Illustrator or InDesign gives me MUCH more flexibility and standards-compliance (mind you, by standards I mean I can create files that printers and service bureaus can actually work with). The very moment Adobe decides to port Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign over to FreeBSD (even closed source, I don't care) I'll dump my Win2K partitions straight away. Until then Linux/BSD just don't cut it for me yet, that's why I still dual boot between Win2K and FreeBSD 4.6 these days. FreeBSD+KDE3 is my desktop of choice, but for my job as a graphics designer I boot into windows. Apple's hardware is just too expensive, and I've given up hope for OS-X on x86. Maybe someday Wine will be so good that the aforementioned apps will run without a hitch, but I'm not holding my breath.

      --
      Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
    25. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

      I work for a web company and besides having to program in PHP I also have to design here and there. To test these things IE is a must have, because most people will use IE to view the site.

      In most other cases the reason for not "being able" to switch are tools I got used to, like Windows Commander, Programmer's File Editor, Corel Photo Paint and some other things.

      I installed Linux several times (several versions and distributions of course) just to see how far it has come. Once I tried to get the extra buttons on my Logitech keyboard to work. No chance. There seemed to be some hacks out there according to Google, but nothing simple. And that's a big problem, because those keys really increase my productivity. I miss them every time when I use different computer.

      And you find that in other areas of Linux as well. Of course there are editors, file managers, browsers and so on. But most of them (at least the easy-to-use-ones) are not available for Windows, so if I try to switch, I have to learn ALL of them from scratch because my favourite Windoze apps are not available for Linux. Last time I checked there was a Windows Commander clone. But like many things in Linux it seemed to be a project that somebody started 3 weeks ago - not a full blown product with all the little details that make it rock.

      I hate the feeling of not knowing how to do the simplest things - like setting an environment variable so that it remains set when I reboot - though almost nobody I know comes close to my knowledge of and experience with computers - I'm talking about people in RL, of course.

      So when I use Windows, I am the master, I control the system. When I use Linux, I feel like Alice in Wonderland. Lots of cool things here and there but I don't relly know how to use them the best way.

      Currently I lack the time of getting used to Linux to use it efficiently.

      But I think porting KDE to Windows would help a bit. Then I can get the Linux desktop experience on Windows. When I get to a point were I need to do something NOW and not after I read a really long HOWTO or something, I can easily use the techniques I know under Windows and learn the Linux way later. Or not. Who cares ;)

    26. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

      Which common standards are you talking about?

      The standards KDE apps follow?
      The standards Gnome apps follow?
      The common standards that should make them use the same clipboard?
      The common standards that should allow to define a set of icons you want to have on your desktop and when you switch from KDE to Gnome, they are still there?
      The common standards that make them use the same start menu?
      The common standards that make it so simple to write a configuration program that can be used with every distro - after all they are all called Linux, so what?
      The common standards that allow having to configure one aspect of the system at a single place instead of two or three (what was it, fonts?).
      The common standards that allow setting a "default browser" in one single central place? Did I miss anything?

      Linux distributions are no operating systems like Windows is. Linux is the kernel and a bunch of applications that different people developed for different reasons in different ways with different aims. Windows is explorer, registry, dial up network, system control panel, etc. plus apps that use them somehow. Common standards!!!

      I don't want to say that Microsoft did those things the best way - far from it. But Linux does not even have something like this. There is no central unit. KDE brings a bit of this feeling back, but there are too many important Linux apps that were not developed for KDE. Now read the paragraph again with s/KDE/Gnome/g;

      Complete decentralization is cool for P2P but it's the worst thing you can do with operating systems IMHO.

    27. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by ebm_kid · · Score: 1

      You are actually joking aboyut this aren't you ? Really... Please say you are.

    28. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about decent graphics packages and page layout tools? Don't give me the lowdown about latex or Gimp. I know.. but Gimp is a far cry from what Photoshop 6 is

      Ever heard of Corel Photo-Paint? I use it on both Linux and Windows and blow the doors off of Photo$hop. All of Adobe's products are way overpriced.

    29. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I think porting KDE to Windows would help a bit. Then I can get the Linux desktop experience on Windows.

      Already being done. See http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net/

      Unfortunately, the cygwin xfree86 window is not modeless like X-Darwin's. :(

    30. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      The standards KDE apps follow?

      KDE Standards.

      The standards Gnome apps follow?

      KDE Standards.

      The common standards that should make them use the same clipboard?

      Being discussed already I think

      The common standards that should allow to define a set of icons you want to have on your desktop and when you switch from KDE to Gnome, they are still there?

      Use one or the other! They are NOT complementary. Same as with Windows, OSX, OS/2 and every DE

      The common standards that make them use the same start menu?

      Use one or the other! They are NOT complementary. Same as with Windows, OSX, OS/2 and every DE

      The common standards that make it so simple to write a configuration program that can be used with every distro - after all they are all called Linux, so what?

      Valid point :) (though beign addressed)

      The common standards that allow having to configure one aspect of the system at a single place instead of two or three (what was it, fonts?).

      Well, mostly everything is configured at one place, the diversity comes mostlyfrom frontends (except when using different stuff like lpd or CUPS)

      The common standards that allow setting a "default browser" in one single central place? Did I miss anything?

      It's already there for Gnome and KDE!

      Your complaint seem to be more that there are multiple possibilities or too much variants of everything to have standarized products. The point is valid! But that does not mean Linux is crap.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    31. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1
      Your complaint seem to be more that there are multiple possibilities or too much variants of everything to have standarized products. The point is valid! But that does not mean Linux is crap.
      I never said so. Linux stands for lots of cool techniques, choices over choices and so on. It's the coolest playground for programmers on earth. With playground being a universe that allows the programmer to be god because he could change really anything.

      Unfortunately this also means that Linux is chaos. No sandbox looks tidy, right? Linux is a huge sandbox where you can play as much as you want.

      Linux rocks for developers, but end users will always feel a bit helpless, if they want a clean system (which I guess they want). It's like a child's room of the size of 1000 m and you are the one who has to tidy it. You wouldn't even want to make a list of the stuff in there unless you go into the room because of the stuff in there. The typical Windows user that wants to get work done in the first place does not want to explore the complete room to know how he can do his stuff the best way. He's fine with dictated solutions, as long as they more or less work for him.

      Making an Open Source Operating System for the masses could use Linux (the kernel) as the bases and probably some KDE stuff, too (like KParts), but the applications of it have to be developed after new common standards so that the programs integrate much better. You can reuse the core of many existing programs, I think, but all the front end stuff and the interfaces (at API level) will have to be changed to make this possible. This is a lot of work. And it's not what's going on in Linux today, because that's not what Linux is about. That's okay, but then don't expect Linux to become mainstream ever.

      Linux is Linux and it should stay that way (because this is freedom). An OS-OS should be a seperate project IMHO (because there you want control, which is managed freedom if it's done right).
    32. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

      And it's not KDE 3. It's like wearing second hand, it just does not feel as good. And Windows users will turn away from KDE if you show them a KDE without all the eye candy and speed that KDE 3 seems to have (have not tried it - yet)

    33. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Linux is choice. Once you have _chosen_, then it can be anything you had wanted it to be (depending on previous choices).

      For a company making a software app. it can be a trouble (for support especially) since many people can run different stuff.

      But from a users perspective well, you can have a decent grass playground with NO sand whatsoever. Granted, you'll have to tidy it yourself once you screw it :)

      I don't me to contradict you, but the problem is i am very tidy, and have chosen a lot (meaning have to discard a lot so to keep the thing "windows wise" consistent).

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    34. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

      To me Linux feels untidy right out of the box. There is a system after which the things are done, but the system itself is... not what I would do. It starts with the directory structure. It is not intuitive where you will find a certain binary - /bin? /usr/bin? /usr/local/bin? /sbin? /usr/sbin? /usr/local/sbin? And so on. After a while you begin to understand that sbin is for the super user. But why do I find the user data in /home and not in /usr? It seems weird right from the start. But changing only this aspect will cause a really big amount of problems.

      It already sucks that you have to set a shebang line with an absolute path in most cases. If that script is used on your PC (maybe it runs under Windows, so you might have to use #!c:/Progra...) and on several websites on several servers, you have to edit this line for several servers. At least if they don't use /usr/bin/perl.

      In this regard, even the windows file extension approach is good (it knows that .pl has to be opened with perl.exe in dir X).

      Nevertheless I understand that the shebang line has other advantages.

      But Linux is a bit to much chaos for me. This is why every Linux guru really impresses me. I'm not willing to explore this mess to finally find the advantages over Windows (and Linux surely has them) though I consider myself a geek. But probably this is why I read /. though all my friends lough at me ;)

    35. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      It is caos. Unless you don't want to selfmaintain the system (and just use redcarpet, rpm2date or the suse updater).

      So yes, the directory structure is a mess (completelly agree). I'd love to see everything moved to /system, except for the /home dir.

      It's complicated (too much legacy). But the user doesn't need to see/understand all that mess. At least, that's how I think! Only his home dir is relevant.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    36. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by 'The+'.$L3mm1ng · · Score: 1

      Which is filled by varios .anything files and directories. This is as annoying as Windows Apps creating their own files and folders in "My Documents" - the way they do it is just not how I like it (and differs from app to app). That's why I store "My Documents" somewhere else which is easier under Windows than it is under Linux because of the drive letters. No, that's not a good invention either. Man, that's weird...

      Hiding away the chaos by front ends just does not feel right IMHO. Sometimes you have to make a cut und rebuild everything based on the experience you have. That's evolution. Linux is a dinosaur ;) He can try as hard as he wants, but cleaning the house won't be possible for him. Sorry. He's not designed for it. But he has other valuable qualities.

      The problem with hiding the chaos is that you have to hide anything then. I don't think that's a fun job, and in a recent /. article about OS developers we saw that this is a motivation killer. The result is holes. Sometimes there is no other way to do stuff, important stuff, than to dive into the chaos and edit a strange configuration file or something. At this point you need to tell the user the truth. "Yes. Linux is a mess. Yes, you have to use the command line to do that, I'm sorry. Use the pipe sign. Yes, use Alt Gr + the key with the arrow brackets on them. No, not that one. Use chmod 755. Yes, C, H, M, O, D..."
      Not to *bash* the command line. Haha ;)

      Hiding the chaos is easier than starting from scratch, this is right. The typical Linux user is fine with that chaos because he got used to it, so it does not stand in his way. But for newbies the learning curve is too big and I don't think that KDE can cover all holes. So chances look bad for Linux on the Mainstream Desktop, I think.

      Yet I think there must be a way to build an operating system in a way that both allows complete control for the gurus and easy and consistent configurability and usability for the average Joe. But, again, if this was Linux, it would be Linux the kernel plus a bunch of stuff developed after one standard (or what is the correct expression? Develop according to a standard? I'm not sure). Not Linux as we know it today.

    37. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by fferreres · · Score: 2

      I don't think I agree with everything you said. For example, you can't hide the fact that permissions per users, and having different users do different stuff are usefull (and complex). You may not need it yet, but you will at some point. Everything in your home dir is your, so mama shouldn't know. But if they want to delete /sbin, they will find out they can't and that's good.

      I mean, you can use Lindows, but I don't think it's usefull. For he 2.6 or 2.8 kernel they will be trying to finegrain the "root" user concept. So you don't always need to be root for lot of stuff.

      Regarding the .whatever files, I preffer that system than to hide everything in the Registry or in GConf. Why? Because I can really backup my users data and config, and if want, i can take a look at what's there. Maybe everything could have been placed under a ~/.config/ so as to not mess the home dir.

      As for the frontend stuff, it pretty much depends on ho the frontend is done. If the core part is not really meant to be frontended you can have a problem. Core app should take into account that they may need to be frontended. I mean, it would be close to have an interface to EVERY program. Where ONE frontend would be a command line utility and there could be other frontends (differet commandline, a KDE GUI, a GTK GUI, a Gnome gui). That alone would be a great adition.

      There are some apps that deal with this sucessfully. For example Xine has completely separated the GUI stuff from the core program, and you have a lot of "quality" frontends.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    38. Re:not to be a wet blanket, but... by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

      I've used this, and I don't like it. I pitted Photoshop (then at version 3.0) against PhotoPaint (then at version 5) and was horribly disgusted at the clumsiness with which Photopaint worked. Mind you, I was actually using Photopaint before I ever got a copy of Photoshop to play with so I wasn't biased towards Adobe. They just had a MUCH better product there and then. Nowadays Photoshop 6 fills all my needs, and I haven't checked back on photopaint since version 7 which I then compared to photoshop 4.0 if I'm not mistaken, but IMHO it still sucks eggs compared to Adobe's offering. Colour is important to me, I send it to professional presses not just desktop inkjets and photopaint (ver. 7 at least, I realize we're at 10 or something like that nowadays) just doesn't cut it. Transparency is also something Photoshop shines at.. I for one prefer Adobe's offerings above anything else I've seen on the market for the past 10 years. This 'market' being mostly the warez-scene for me back then.. I was 14.. but it doesn't make any difference now that I'm running a business and using the latest Photoshop legally. The Adobe products aren't overpriced if you buy them as part of a 'Collection', which I did for two PC's. Such a collection offers 4 grade-A applications for the price of a single one bought separately. Upgrades are dirt-cheap. I'd NEVER buy a Corel graphics product again after the horrible piece of crap called Corel7 (the whole package). Also, try submitting a .CDR to a service bureau. Some will accept it, but most will have problems with it. I'd rather submit .ai or .eps (which CorelDraw has always had trouble creating properly). I have deadlines to meet, and that makes me choose Adobe products. I've used the rest, like Quark, Corel, Aldus (back when they owned PageMaker ver. 5) and Ventura.. they're just not as good.In my spare time I immediately boot to FreeBSD and enjoy a real OS, but that's just a hobby. I don't seriously use it on my desktop for anything other than mail, news and irc. All my servers run it 24/7 and have been up for over 84 days now since the last power dip, I love BSD on servers, but that's a whole different story. I can only hope and dream that one day my money-making apps will be ported to at least Linux so I can run them on FreeBSD in emulation and finally be rid of M$ since I refuse to buy Apple's hardware at their ridiculous price.

      --
      Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
  7. Myths About KDE by LordYUK · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Over the past years a large amount of myths has built up around KDE..."
    Number one of which is: KDE does NOT stand for "Killer Dog Eaters"
    :P

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
    1. Re:Myths About KDE by krmt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm pretty sure that it originally stood for Kool Desktop Environment. I think now the official position is that the K doesn't stand for anything, but I think that they're just covering up the dumb idea to deliberately misspell cool :-)

      I've also read that they chose K because it was the first letter after L, for Linux. I believe the former more than the latter though.

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    2. Re:Myths About KDE by reverius · · Score: 1

      Umm... K is the first letter before L. Not to nitpick or anything.

      Otherwise it'd be the M Desktop Environment. Which would actually be pretty cool... Somebody should start that project :P

    3. Re:Myths About KDE by Gorak · · Score: 1
      I've also read that they chose K because it was the first letter after L, for Linux...

      Uh, perhaps in your alphabet it is...

      --

      I had one, but the wheel fell off.
    4. Re:Myths About KDE by krmt · · Score: 2

      You're right. My mistake, but the idea is still there, whether or not you believe it.

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    5. Re:Myths About KDE by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      I for some reason thought it was "Kommon Desktop Environment" (what with the use of "k" in front of everything and using it in place of "c" or "q"). Perhaps it means KDE Desktop Environment, because we could always use more recursive acronyms (presumably it would be pronounced "de", as the "k" is silent).

    6. Re:Myths About KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed the K did at one point, for about 30 seconds, stand for Kool - in the very initial call to developer.

      It was immediately considered a bad idea to name something 'Kool' but the acronym KDE stuck nicely, so they kept that around.

      http://freekde.org/neil/kdeannounce.html

      Here ya go folks...

      Troy Unrau
      troy@kde.org

    7. Re:Myths About KDE by Oestergaard · · Score: 3, Interesting

      KDE stands for:
      (The) Kalle Dalheimer Experience ;)

      (See http://www.kde.org/people/kalle.html)

    8. Re:Myths About KDE by imta11 · · Score: 1

      In my alphabet K is before L.

      sorry...

    9. Re:Myths About KDE by zdzichu · · Score: 2, Informative

      I head that at the beggining they tried to reassemble CDE - desktop environment popular on unix workstations.

      --
      :wq
    10. Re:Myths About KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real reason is that the KDE project started out as a replacement for CDE, the environment popular on solaris.

    11. Re:Myths About KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, this is where GNOME excels handily. However you may feel about feet, at least the acronym actually stands for something. Though I'd probably disown "Kool" if it was my project too.

      Either way, Don't you ever wish there was a system that involved no letters at all, to spare users the agony of those contrived G/Knames.... The Linux Desktop Wars: more spelling & grammar casualties than GI Joe.

      FLAK = Field Light Attack Kannon? SNAKE = System Neutralizer Armed Kloaking Equipment? MORAY = Marine Assault Nautical Transport: Air-Driven....

    12. Re:Myths About KDE by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      Whoever modded this down to a 0 is a moron of the first water. This is the ONLY reply that actually answers the question accurately! Who's watching the moderators, anyway? What, are these guys rejects from the police academy?

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    13. Re:Myths About KDE by Kyeo · · Score: 1

      Nobody modded it. AC's post at 0.

    14. Re:Myths About KDE by EggplantMan · · Score: 1

      I think you mean the first letter before L.

      --

      ?-|||-----x<*))))><
    15. Re:Myths About KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if initally they did choose the K to
      stand for Kool, the mispelling would be more
      of a trademark issue than a longing to be
      a "K-rad Kewl d00d" type of desktop. "Cool
      Desktop Environment" would of course be
      abbreviated to CDE, which I believe is a
      trademark of the Open Group. Of course this
      is wild speculation.

      Andrew

    16. Re:Myths About KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    17. Re:Myths About KDE by lmfr · · Score: 1

      There is a CDE that may have caused some confusion.

    18. Re:Myths About KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " See, this is where GNOME excels handily."

      About the ONLY thing Gnome excels at...

    19. Re:Myths About KDE by HydroCarbon10 · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, they polluted everyone's thinking and now people insist on naming their KDE software with Ks. Of course, if someone writes something it's their right to name it Stinky Dog Poop if they want. In fact, that might be preferable to the "K" thing. I've seriously thought of writing a script that will tr/[kK]/[cC]/ the name of every program and every reference to those programs.

      Maybe I'm just need mental help.

      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows box is at 9.8 meters per second square.
    20. Re:Myths About KDE by droberge · · Score: 1
      I remeber someone saying once that they stopped talking about the 'Kool Desktop Environment' after a couple of nastygrams from lawyers representing the makers of Kool cigarettes.

      But yes, the original annoucement said that the K stood for 'Kool'

    21. Re:Myths About KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should use Lindows, they renamed many KDE programs and Gnumeric to Numeric too.

    22. Re:Myths About KDE by aCC · · Score: 1

      See the announcement here

    23. Re:Myths About KDE by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

      I always thought it was a pun on "CDE".

    24. Re:Myths About KDE by glitchvern · · Score: 1

      I remember the 1.x versions looked very much like cde (common desktop environment) which was frequently used on commercial unices at the time and still is I believe. Xfce is a window manager that looks like cde now you can check it out if you want to see what cde looks like. Once it hit 2.x it started looking like windows.

    25. Re:Myths About KDE by Dimensio · · Score: 1

      I knoe CDE, it's used at the university I attend. I prefer KDE...or actually just about anything to it :)

    26. Re:Myths About KDE by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      Gee, I don't seem to be eligible. Maybe if I can get some crony to moderate a one-line quip into a +5 (funny) 8 or 10 times I can meta-moderate. Am I the only one here who sees this con?

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    27. Re:Myths About KDE by HydroCarbon10 · · Score: 2

      Great, except for that fact that I spend 90% of my time in Linux doing development.

      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows box is at 9.8 meters per second square.
  8. clip board popup by dciman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Anyone else get violently upset witht he clipboard program in KDE. Who was the person who though it to be a good idea for that little option bar to popup when I selected an internat address?? So that everytime I select all in the url box of my web browser it comes up, takes focus away from the app I am using and asks when I want to do..... I KNOW WHAT I WANT TO DO!!!! ;-) There is most likely a way to alter its behavior... but I thought it was a silly thing to have by default. But what do I care?? I use Blackbox anyhow!

    1. Re:clip board popup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right click on the clipboard icon and uncheck "Enable Actions"

    2. Re:clip board popup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A-freaking-men, brother! Although I just turned it off (set the timeout for the popups to 0 seconds)

    3. Re:clip board popup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't use the option which was designed to turn it off, why do you wonder it's not turned off if you change another setting?

    4. Re:clip board popup by Satai · · Score: 2

      The Klipboard manager (Klippy? I can't remember) is quite configurable... I got irritated with it doing that every tiem I was in Mozilla (very rarely, mind you) and looked around - there's a section of the configuration where you can define different window classes for it to ignore. I did that, and haven't been happier...

    5. Re:clip board popup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck yes. That's the thing I always disabled first of all in KDE. The rest of KDE is nice but that was a truly awful idea.

    6. Re:clip board popup by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I thought that was kind of weird too. I know it can be disabled and everything, but it does seem odd to have it in by default. I didn't even mind the url popup so much as having it just sometimes pop up when I'm typing normal words.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    7. Re:clip board popup by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      I agree.
      This should be turned off by default.
      It annoys the crap out of me, and now that I know I can be turned off, I will do so. Maybe they should just add a counter. If it steals the focus away from you 25 times and haven't used any of the selections that pop-up once, it should autmatically turn itself off (unless you actually manually enabled it).
      Hmmmm...maybe I'll write the code to do that... If it got included in the release, it would save a lot of people a little bit of annoyance.
      Anyone else think this would be a good idea?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    8. Re:clip board popup by SecretMethod70 · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree with your stance. The popup constantly interferes with what I am doing. I've gotten to the point where I just kill klipper.

    9. Re:clip board popup by Ashtangi · · Score: 1

      That sounds like the annoying kind of behaviour that makes Windows so awkward to use. Why on earth do developers have to be so egotistical that they shove their wiz-bang gadgetry in your face by default? Of course I do this myself, but my users probably love it. If I am working in a window, the only way that window should lose focus is if I directly "tell" it to. Windows violates this premise all of the time. My older unix machines never did . . . Are the KDE developers perhaps looking to closely at the competition?

    10. Re:clip board popup by matvei · · Score: 1

      You can configure it so that it doesn't show popup actions for certain applications. By default these include mozilla, konqueror and a few others (at least that's how it's on my Debian box).

      And besides, this is just a matter of taste. I for instance just love Klipper. It's just so much more convinient to higlight an URL someone pasted to IRC and have it opened immediately, instead of manually opening a browser, deleting the contents of the url bar and then pasting the URL there. But then again I'm a lazy bastard ;-)

    11. Re:clip board popup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The developer's dilemma .... it's been rehashed on a bunch of lists (KDE included) many times .... do you enable all the cool stuff (at least in the first release it's there) so that people can learn about it and start using it, or do you disable it by default and run the risk that 90% of the people who would be helped by it never find out that it exists.
      It's a delicate balance and probably has to be figured out feature by feature - I found the clippy thig so annoying it got turned off right away - some people might find it usefull and want it left on - I suspect it's on the border-line.
      With something like this it may make sense to enable it by default for a couple of releases so that enough people know it's there if they need it then disable it by default

    12. Re:clip board popup by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      Actually I really like this feature and use it fairly often. I can just select a url and almost instantly that will popup and then I can tell it to open that url in konqueror and almost instantly that will open up also. I am running kde 3.0.2 on debian sid. I do web work and I find that almost anytime I select a url I actually want to open in a web browser.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    13. Re:clip board popup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's a delicate balance and probably has to be figured out feature by feature - I found the clippy thig so annoying it got turned off right away - some people might find it usefull and want it left on - I suspect it's on the border-line.

      Wouldn't be so bad if the enable/disable checkbox were included in the popup, a la' those "Don't show this again" checkboxes in welcome dialogs.

    14. Re:clip board popup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue commented on was that the popup still comes up if you are actually working IN a web browser. ie if you highlight the url box contents to delete them and type in a new url.... the popup occurs.

    15. Re:clip board popup by Ambassador+Kosh · · Score: 1

      I have kde 3.0.2 and if I select a url in the url box in mozilla 1.0 and konqueror 3.0.2 I can not reproduce that. Maybe that is a bug that has been fixed.

      --
      Computer modeling for biotech drug manufacturing is HARD! :)
    16. Re:clip board popup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hehheehe "Violently upset". Dude you've gotta stay off the roids and chill out a bit!!

    17. Re:clip board popup by beatbox · · Score: 1

      I think good (default or not) behavior would be:

      when I select a url, open this little option-bar out of the way, but keep focus in the window I was working in, and if I don't use the little option-bar within a configurable number of seconds (5?) then close it. Then it would be there if you wanted it, and it wouldn't get in your way if you don't.

      Bam.

    18. Re:clip board popup by platypus · · Score: 2

      I don't know if you're a developer, but maybe it's an idea which hasn't been discussed.
      The developer's dilemma .... it's been rehashed on a bunch of lists (KDE included) many times .... do you enable all the cool stuff (at least in the first release it's there) so that people can learn about it and start using it, or do you disable it by default and run the risk that 90% of the people who would be helped by it never find out that it exists.

      Take a look at open office. When I first started the (beta) version of OO and wrote something just for getting the feel of it, it suddenly capitalized the first word I typed.
      At the same time, a light bulb was shown down right on the screen.

      "Arrgh,", I thought, "so the adapted the annoying everytime-I-have-to-search-half-an-hour-to-disable -that shit autocorrect functions of word and the same kind of annoying assistant stuff"

      Wrong. When I klicked on the bulb, a help page was shown to explain what just happend (auto-correcting) and what it is. It also asked me if I wanted to use that in the future or not, and showed where to configure it at a later time.

      That's great! Show all features on first use, but also explain them and make it easy to disable them right after the first occurance.

  9. Alpha menus & drop shadows by Eagle7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I looked at the screenshots, and the transparent menus and the drop shadows on the menu look really nice. I'm curious - are these KDE application things? Are they part of the windows manager that comes with KDE? Are they QT? And will they work over everything, or will they only work when QT menus are displayed over QT aps?

    Just wondering if it is possible to have such nifty eyecandy work with my 95% GTK+/Sawfish environment, or if I would have to switch to the KDE environment to see this features.

    --
    _sig_ is away
    1. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see, it works as follows:

      The kde/qt app calculates the area that will be
      covered by the rectangle that is the menu, takes
      a quick pixmap image of that rectangle, and then
      uses that pixmap (with some added effects) as
      the backdrop to the menu itself.

      This is very similar to the way konsole, eterm,
      etc. render transparency.

      You'll only get transparent mennu's when the app
      displaying the menu is a kde/qt app, but it does
      not matter which app it being covered by the
      menu, since the pixmap comes from X.

      Troy Unrau
      troy@kde.org

    2. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are implemented in the KStyle class, which is the base for many, but not all, of the KDE Widget styles (it is used by HC/B3/Classic, Keramik, and partially (w/o transparency support) KThemeStyle, the pixmap engine. Thus, they benefit only Qt3 and KDE3 apps.

      Thus you either need to convince the Gtk developer to implement corresponding features (I think they do the transluency in Gtk2 already); or give KDE a try..

    3. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by JabberWokky · · Score: 4, Informative
      Yes, in other words it is bullshit fakery

      Um. Pardon me, but how else are you supposed to render translucent objects? You always have to calculate the final result somewhere. If you have a card and driver combo that supports it in hardware via XRENDER, it does it there. If you don't, it emulates it in software (you can force it one way or the other via the Control Center). Other than hardware or software, where else is it supposed to be rendered? By amish stained glass sculptors sitting on a three legged stool next to your monitor?

      --
      Evan "Ya, Mister Godwin, that looks good. I'll have the next menu ready for you in about three hours, sure enough".

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by Paladin128 · · Score: 2

      You have to have all the KDE Libs installed, but you do not have to be running KDE to take advantage of the eye candy. You will have to configure it with the KDE controll panel, but you can keep on using whatever other environment you wish.

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    5. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that it's a crappy limitation of X imposed on the user. It's not real transparency of however-many layers you might have, it's bullshit fakery, as the original poster said.

    6. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by Damek · · Score: 1

      On a slightly unrelated note, I just hope the rewrite it when XFree86 finally supports alpha blending. When alpha blending is a part of X, presumably transparency, shadows, etc. will be faster, easier, and no hacks will be required.

      Presumably...

      If it happens...

    7. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What happens if the underneath changes when the menu is up?

      It changes. You can put a movie underneath it and watch the movie through the menu. Well... assuming your video driver supports it. The fact that there are no available video drivers that support this feature is due to the newness of this capability in X.

      bullshit fakery being passed off as the real thing - the KDE project in a nutshell.

      Hang onto your copy of KDE 3.1. When the driver for your videocard supports the new extension, watch a nice DivX and pop a menu over it. Maybe you'll understand the concept of a new API definition requiring the upgrade of existing drivers.

      It's a bit like if Doom III comes out running on OpenGL 2, and your video card only supports OpenGL 1.x, and you run around screaming "Doom III doesn't really work. It's all bullshit fakery - Id Software in a nutshell."

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by tjansen · · Score: 1

      There are reasons for the limitation: for true transparency you need update several layers for each pixel which requires a much more complex dialog between X11 server and the client. The server must send an update request to the first client, then the client will paint and send an message to the server that it is finished. Then the server goes to the next client and so on.
      Right now the server just sends an redraw request to the client that owns the pixel(s) and that's it.

    9. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The proper analogy would if KDE were developing something like Quake 1 when Doom3 was about to be released. We're comparing apples to apples - KDE to Windows - that's all.

      KDE's transparency is a hack to work around crappy subsystems. Now it's a clever hack, granted, but that a hack was required to get the effect says something.

    10. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      The fact that you're trolling as AC only makes you bullshit fakery.

      No I don't care about your opinion.

    11. Re:Alpha menus & drop shadows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It changes. You can put a movie underneath it and watch the movie through the menu. Well... assuming your video driver supports it. The fact that there are no available video drivers that support this feature is due to the newness of this capability in X.

      Like the other guy said, you deliberately misundertand - to which I would add, you then bullshit for two pages of text

      The KDE project is pushing this as translucency, when in fact it doesn't work. So you've added a translucency flag to the API, so what? IT DOESN'T WORK WHEN SOMETHING CHANGES UNDERNEATH - and yet it is being advertised as the real deal. As I said, the KDE project is famous for this shit... pre-announcing features as working, when in fact it doesn't. It doesn't help that you spend four or five messages spreading disinformation and deliberately avoiding answering any real questions - and your KDE moderator mates consistently mod you up, and any dissenters down.

      BTW: You can get similar translucency with GNOME panels, but it just isn't hyped as being the real thing.

  10. KDE Usability by krmt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aaron J Siego also started up the KDE Usability Project, in order to spearhead work on improving the KDE UI. I was following the list for quite a few weeks, until the traffic grew too substantial to keep up with. But according to the 3.1 alpha release notes, some of their intial work, including work on Kicker, is going to be included in the new release.

    This is a wonderful thing. From reading the list, I know that they've painstakingly thought through the work they've done, modeled and remodeled, discussed and argued all the little details to get things as good as they could. Progress has been slow for that reason, but it is substantial, and over time I think it'll bring KDE's usability to something we can all really be proud of.

    Features are nice, but I think improving the usability of KDE will help everyone in the long run.

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    1. Re:KDE Usability by stilborne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      well, to be fair, i didn't "start up" the KDE usability project. it just wasn't very active before i and a few others descended upon it and decided to get some actual reports written and some actual coding done.

      i believe jono started the project and others such as chris howells were involved early on.

      the time and effort of everyone who took the initiative has resulted in more and more of the KDE developers and users (along with some new devels and usability people) getting on the list and getting involved.

      it's fun to be part of something positive and intense as it unfolds ...

      AJS

    2. Re:KDE Usability by HanzoSan · · Score: 1, Redundant



      ok so when will they use the icon animation ability of KDE to improve useability while also providing eyecandy?

      Right now its useless flash put your mouse over a folder and it opens, its not useful like put a cd in your cd rom drive and hit burn and a spinning burning cd,

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:KDE Usability by mrroach · · Score: 1

      For the love of God, how many times are you going to repeat your burning desire for a spinny CD?

      Yes, a spinny CD would be nice. Please, somebody make this poor man a spinny CD icon so he can know when his CD is spinning. Now THAT would be a use of animation that is not pointless flash.

      <to moderators: look how many times this guy is getting modded up for OT and repetetive posts>

    4. Re:KDE Usability by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

      In trying to explain how usability must be improved everywhere, and how kde should focus on its exclusive features,

      if you looked at my other posts also mention alpha channeling, genie effects, and motion blur, i mention how lindows and others should fund enhancements to xfree, i mentioned how after xfree is improved kde should focus on improving kdes usability not just by adding eye candy but by making it useful.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    5. Re:KDE Usability by krmt · · Score: 2

      Either way, as near as I can tell, you guys jumpstarted the project, and it was a badly needed thing. I feel bad that I can't follow the mailing list any more (you guys just generate way too much traffic for me :-) but I'm glad you're all doing the work that needs to be done. It's really the next major step for KDE, and I'm really happy that you guys are working on it. Linux will make it on to more desktops, and it will be because of projects like this one.

      Now if all developers really start to pay attention beforehand, things will really start to improve :-)

      --

      "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  11. This kind of reminds me of something..... by Gabreal · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is it just me or is this remind any of you of MS Win XP! Sorry but IMHO this looks like Win XP where most of the stuff hasn't changed it just looks "Prettier" every body knows that XP was just a pretty GUI and it looks like this is too. Plus the way I see it is that the only real reason they put this out is b/c they want more money and the only way to get that is by putting out prettier versions with no real reason too... Just my $0.02

    1. Re:This kind of reminds me of something..... by Marque_Off · · Score: 1

      KDE is a desktop...not an OS. And it's free...no money...

      --
      While at a conference a few weeks back, I spent an interesting evening with a grain of salt.
    2. Re:This kind of reminds me of something..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Is it just me or is this remind any of you of MS Win XP! Sorry but IMHO this looks like Win XP where most of the stuff hasn't changed it just looks "Prettier" every body knows that XP was just a pretty GUI and it looks like this is too. Plus the way I see it is that the only real reason they put this out is b/c they want more money and the only way to get that is by putting out prettier versions with no real reason too... Just my $0.02 [my emphasis]

      In the bolded text, were you talking about the KDE project or Microsoft and XP? Because KDE's free, so I'm confooozed about where the 'more money' would come from if you meant that project.

    3. Re:This kind of reminds me of something..... by Roadmaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'll agree that the new KDE *THEME* seen on the screenshots looks a lot like WinXP, but keep in mind that it can be made to look like almost anything you want.

      Also, I disagree with "every body knows that XP was just a pretty GUI". Compared to Windows2000, perhaps it was; but most consumers weren't using Win2k, but Win9x. And WinXP is insistently aimed at home users too, touting new, unheard-of features like STABILITY (whoaaaaaa) and stuff like that. WinXP mixes all that stuff.

      Finally, WinXP's prettyness can be argued with; i think it looks childish and dumb, but that's just me..

    4. Re:This kind of reminds me of something..... by akandels · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with looking good. 99% of the Linux applications out there look like crap. Microsoft did not patent eye candy, and a wonderful project like KDE should not be critizised for doing such an excellent job on not only stability and usability, but looks and UI. And at the same time, if KDE did make money in sales (which is doesn't, you moron), what the hell is wrong with tailoring your product to match the consumer's needs? You make me angry.

    5. Re:This kind of reminds me of something..... by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      "every body knows that XP was just a pretty GUI and it looks like this is too."

      You just explained it right there. People want Windows XP (or MacOS) without the Windows or the Mac.

      There isn't anything wrong with that. Why not take some of the best features of the other popular GUIs and put it into your own? You can always use a different desktop environment and/or window manager.

      I personally think that it looks more like MacOS X than a Windows machine, though.

    6. Re:This kind of reminds me of something..... by chowells · · Score: 1

      Go try and read one of the articles linked to in the story: http://kdemyths.urbanlizard.com/viewMyth.php?mythI D=38.

    7. Re:This kind of reminds me of something..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KDE has chosen the path of copying Windows releases in look/style and apps

      KDE1 == Win95
      KDE2.x == W2k
      KDE3.x == XP

      Then we have the wannabe IE, called Konqurer. KDE team have no new ideas other than stealing from MS.

  12. Alpha software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when did Slashdot become Freshmeat ... for alpha software?

  13. Installation still a chore? by MagPulse · · Score: 1

    I went to KDE.org, and the installation instructions for KDE 3 still start out with "First, you will need this library. Now, here's a list of packages you will be installing..." I installed Gnome a year ago with Ximian's go-gnome script, which was totally painless. Is anything like this in the works for KDE?

    1. Re:Installation still a chore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an alpha. If you don't want to compile try using the binary packages.
      Using Debian KDE should painlesly install too.

      Thorsten

    2. Re:Installation still a chore? by ewomack · · Score: 1

      Yes - If you are using Source Mage GNU/Linux. You simply type:

      cast kde-profile

      And it will go down the list of available packages, ask which ones you want then download the source and compile it.

    3. Re:Installation still a chore? by pivo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, I prefer KDE over GNOME (but I use both) installation is the one thing that GNOME does much better than KDE. I whish they'd make it easier to update, something on the order of RedCarpet.

    4. Re:Installation still a chore? by tjansen · · Score: 2

      Yes, the project is called Kalypso. It is far from being usable though.

    5. Re:Installation still a chore? by chowells · · Score: 1

      Indeed, while the frontend exists (the easy and fun bit) the backend doesn't ;)

      See my web page at http://mail.kde.org/~howells/kalypso for screenshots.

    6. Re:Installation still a chore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in gentoo, it is simply

      emerge kde

      forget the other distos

    7. Re:Installation still a chore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apt-get install kde?

  14. ** Sigh *** by BranMan · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately Aaron Seigo didn't make his KDE Myths a single FAQ style page but a cascading set of pages. Can someone mirror them before they are slashdotted out of creation?

    1. Re:** Sigh *** by navindra · · Score: 1

      His page wasn't actually meant to be launched at this point, FWIW. KC KDE (and consequently the dot) leaked it a bit early.

    2. Re:** Sigh *** by stilborne · · Score: 1

      yeah, well ... too late for that. an "all in one page" option was slated for this weekend and the official release of the site was for next week. i even stated on a public list where it was discussed that bandwidth was an issue ATM on the server it is currently sitting on. but i suppose someone just had to post it to slashdot, didn't they. *sigh*

      AJS

    3. Re:** Sigh *** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't it make it to KCKDE, which has your name on it, first? :)

    4. Re:** Sigh *** by chowells · · Score: 1

      KC KDE is written by a number of contributors, who are free to include what they like (Aaron is one of the contributors, as is myself).

  15. Sweet! by friedmud · · Score: 2

    Have been looking forward to this - thought it was going to be a while before we got it. Nice to see they are still making a lot of progress after the 3.0 release.

    PS: keramik kicks a$$

    Derek

  16. WinXP looking by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Is it just me, or is KDE looking a lot like WinXP?

    Personally, I think it's ugly.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:WinXP looking by chowells · · Score: 1

      It's just you.

    2. Re:WinXP looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XP looks like made of that aluminium paper that comes around Easter eggs (i.e., looks cheap). Not ugly, but not interesting, too.

      KDE (mainly Keramik) seems to aim at an enamel (or pearl-like paint) finish look, which is far more appealing (at least to me, duh).

    3. Re:WinXP looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah you're right...tho it looks like the only users who dont see it is the KDE users, in denial. They prefer to flame you for remarks like (XP == KDE3). Its nothing new anyway, they imitated w2k look in the KDE2 series...

    4. Re:WinXP looking by StillaCoward · · Score: 1

      I can't fully describe it, but the effect is not of a WinXP look alike. Infact, I'd buy that it is an OS X look alike more readily. WinXP has a childish pastel looking and color scheme. KDE seem to borrow many elements from the Mac, and the colors, while blue, do not have a pastel look about them.

      In my opinion, KDE's look is much more attractive.

  17. Nothing original by d3xt3r · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I know that copying is the best form of flattery, but this is getting ridiculous.

    KDE 1 - 2 were attempts to copy windows UI with some small differences.

    It now appears that KDE 3.1 is going for the Appple OS X Aqua look. Look at the screen shots. The task bar looks like the OS X dock and they even called it Qwertz.

    I love Linux on the desktop, and I love KDE, but unless it offers something original, something that Windows and Mac OS don't, then what's the point?

    1. Re:Nothing original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't call it qwertz, that's the nick of one of the graphics developers...

      heh

      what lengths some people will go to to critisize something...

      Troy Unrau
      troy@kde.org

    2. Re:Nothing original by reaper20 · · Score: 2

      I find the OSX/XP-like look not as appealing as the classic looks myself, and I do agree with you.

      But, you can always change it. I do find it interesting that with the newest development of any major desktop environment, window manager, or application, one of the first things that always gets ported is an OSX/XP looking theme.

      Someday, E17 will come out - and someone will do an OSX for E and Luna for E theme too. Check out the stats on theme sites, those themes are popular, so its natural that the developers would cater to the users.

      I don't like them either, but at least we have a choice!

    3. Re:Nothing original by tomk · · Score: 1

      You don't always have to be original. The first cars probably had 4 wheels and a steering wheel, but I'm sure that you don't mind the fact that that design was copied.

      For people to switch to Linux on the desktop, it's a great advantage if the desktop looks & feels similar to what they already know. Innovation is great but so is imitation, as long as you are imitating something that works well. Whether you love or hate Windows and MacOS, they are both proven designs.

      Besides, KDE does do a lot of innovative things. It just does them in addition to the things that it imitates.

      -Tom

    4. Re:Nothing original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was "original," you'd probably say it sucks.

    5. Re:Nothing original by LMCBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I love Linux on the desktop, and I love KDE, but unless it offers something original, something that Windows and Mac OS don't, then what's the point?


      What's the point? Freedom, for starters. You get a first-rate GUI without sacrificing Freedom. Isn't that worth celebrating, even if the GUI is not totally "original"?

      Besides, why is it necessarily desireable for a GUI to be completely original? It's been said often before, but I guess it bears repeating. Most modern GUI systems look very similar. They all use "windows", "menus", "icons", "buttons", and "desktops". Does this mean that no one can think of anything new, and it's all about "A copied B copied C copied D! Shame on A, B and C!" ? Perhaps. But it's also possible that the Desktop metaphor just makes sense and it works well. Would you rather KDE make a completely new computing paradigm, even if it meant it was harder to use? Just for the sake of being "different"?

      Besides, KDE offers plenty that Win/Mac don't, besides Freedom. Themability, for one. You claim to "love" KDE, and yet it seems you don't understand that the way your desktop looks is largely up to you in KDE. You can make it look very similar to WinXP, or very similar to OSX, or not really like either. The person who took those screenshots chose to have a panel that looks like the OSX dock. Others have an XP-like panel. Mine looks like neither. KDE gives you the freedom to build a desktop that suits your needs and style. How is that copying either OSX or XP?

      I guess I shouldn't even bother...there will always be naysayers. I remember when they were saying "KDE will never be as good as Windows or Mac!". Now it's "Ok, KDE is just as good as Windows/Mac...but it's not BETTER, so what's the point?!"

      Indeed, what's the point?

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    6. Re:Nothing original by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      you wrote: "I love Linux on the desktop, and I love KDE, but unless it offers something original, something that Windows and Mac OS don't, then what's the point?"

      The moment that KDE will be radically different from Mac OS & Windows - thats the moment you'll start loosing people who wants to use Linux and came from Windows world. It's pretty hard to teach a newbie an entirely new window manager and/or desktop enviroment.

      Try taking a kid who used only windows and give him Window Maker. See what he tells you.

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    7. Re:Nothing original by d3xt3r · · Score: 1
      Try taking a kid who's only used Windows and give them a Mac.

      They'll have it figured out real quick, and Macs are not "just like" Windows.

    8. Re:Nothing original by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      I agree with you on this one..

      However - we're talking different things here - a person who gets a Linux distribution from his friends and installs Linux + KDE to learn/experiment VS. your example - to buy a whole new machine...

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    9. Re:Nothing original by Reality_X · · Score: 1

      Apple stole the "Dock" from CDE/KDE in the first place. They just made it only take up 2/3 of the screen, and centered it. Wow. THEY STOLE FROM KDE!

      How original can a GUI get before people say "This is too different, no way I'm using this!"...

      Hey, if you have suggestions, why not email the KDE UI people?

    10. Re:Nothing original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, you are a dumbass, apple stole the dock from themselves (Nextstep) DUH....

    11. Re:Nothing original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not? KDE is blantly ripping off both OSX and XP, you guys have no soul. Gnome2 looks like a clean change, its not an XP/OSX wannabe. You keep sticking up for KDE, even tho our arguements are right. Your Bias attitude blinds you from the real facts.

    12. Re:Nothing original by DickBreath · · Score: 2

      I know that copying is the best form of flattery, but this is getting ridiculous.

      I love Linux on the desktop, and I love KDE, but unless it offers something original, something that Windows and Mac OS don't, then what's the point?


      Yeah. I agree.

      I bought a new Honda, and you know what, the controls had nothing original. The steering wheel, gas pedal, brake, lights, wipers, etc. were all in the same old boring place. Nothing new but just eye candy.

      I was really disgusted. I know that copying is the best form of flattery, but this was just a transparent attempt at a ripoff of General Motors user interface for automobiles.

      I love automobiles, and I love Honda, but unless they offer something original, something that GM and Ford don't, then what's the point?

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    13. Re:Nothing original by StillaCoward · · Score: 1

      Not so.

      I've used a lot of different PC systems and have learned some basic tenants that pretty much old true across the PC world. As such, I can sit down in front of any PC interface be it, Windows, DOS, CDE, KDE, Gnome, etc and pretty much work my way around it.

      What I can not do, is make heads or tails of how to use a Mac. To me they are the most unintuitive pieces of junk I've ever encountered. But that is only because they do not follow any of the rules I am so accustomed to.

      In short, what is "easy" and "intuitive" to a user, is that which follows the rules of least surprise. Linux users are primarily coming from the PC world. They are used to working in environments such as Solaris OS/2s and Windows. These people will be most productive if they do not have to through out all the accumulated knowledge they have learned over the years, and learn something new.

    14. Re:Nothing original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's completely than different what he was saying. The controls you were talking about would be the very basics like windows. When you get into the dock shit then it's copying Apple's UI like he was saying.

    15. Re:Nothing original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >and they even called it Qwertz.

      They don't...that's the nick of the guy who made the screenshots (a great artist btw.)

  18. The best of the best! by jabbadeznuts · · Score: 1

    I've been using KDE since pre 1.0 and I have been VERY happy with every new release. But, installation is still a pain. download tons of RPM and try to figure out in which order they install. It would be nice if the setup was like Gnome with a more simple install. Besides the install, can the KDE team make it that much better?

    Rember, the dream of linux on the desktop is a function of just how easy it is to use. Not just to the hackers, but also to Joe Average.

    1. Re:The best of the best! by Khalid · · Score: 2

      If you are running Redhat just use apt-get (apt for rpm) have a look at http://freshrpms.net for instance, otherwise, there is urpmi for Mandrake, up2date for redhat and so on. Installing rpms with dependencies is now very easy thanks to these tools.

    2. Re:The best of the best! by Ramadog · · Score: 1

      If you downloaded all of the rpms into a single directory all you need is the command rpm *.rpm That will install every rpm that is in the current directory after detemining the correct order to install them.

  19. Slash Tease by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    "here are a bunch of links you might find interesting- but hurry! Hurry! Oh, they're all gone now - sorry. check back in a couple days"

    AMEN Brother.

    Hopefully I'll be able to see some of this stuff tomorrow.

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  20. Perhaps a new name? by reynolds_john · · Score: 1

    I was thinking, "KDE-XP" Actually, the screenshots look beautiful. This is by far my fav window manager.

  21. whoopsie by navindra · · Score: 1

    It looks 256 MaxClient is hardwired in Apache. Oh well, live and learn. We'll have to recompile Apache for next time. We definitely got the CPU/bandwidth for more.

  22. How to install from source? by BigumD · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty new to linux, and I have no idea how to install this if I wanted to. Can some one point me to a site that would have a step-by-step for something like this?

    --
    --The space between my ears was intentionally left blank--
    1. Re:How to install from source? by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2

      don't want to put you down, but since it's an alpha release it's not likely to have precompiled packages yet. this means downloading sources and compiling by yourself, wich is not a trivial task.

      a step-by-step isn't likely to happen too, since the parameters for compiling might change from one distro to another.

      basically:

      download sources
      expand the tar.gz files
      locate a file called README or INSTALL
      follow the instructions on them

      this probably involve solving dependencies (updating other stuff that KDE needs to run such as openGL, QT, etc.), setting up environment variables, telling the configure script where it's suposed to install the binaries, etc.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    2. Re:How to install from source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since the last 3l337 d00d was being a typical slashdot a$$, let me help...

      1) He was right about this being an Alpha release - I'm a 1yr linux newb, and your best bet is to not attempt to install an alpha release. Go here first to see instructions on building/compiling the KDE source for the various versions.

      2) Go here for a list of all the 'newbie' help files, and try out this guide if you don't know what the previous person meant by 'unpacking the tar.gz' files.

    3. Re:How to install from source? by djoham · · Score: 1

      Here's the page that I use when I want both a "stable" KDE and a "alpha/development" KDE on my system. It goes through the process for you step by step. Kudo's to the author...

      David

  23. Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by Weezerfreak · · Score: 1

    Is it me or does this look too much like OS X Aqua??

    1. Re:Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by dadragon · · Score: 1

      We'll see if they get sued (again).

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    2. Re:Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The really ironic thing is that half the threads here are bashing KDE for looking like Aqua, the other half for looking like XP. It seems no one can figure out whom KDE is "ripping off."

      I guess it didn't occur to anyone that maybe the KDE team is incorporating positive features from everything available instead of ignoring innovation. Kind of like what they're supposed to be doing, maybe?

    3. Re:Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doubt it, I thought that the KDE or QT devs have already worked with apple in the past, something about some medical imaging app in the article, if I remember corrrectly (too lazy to search for it).
      Some kinda friendly dev took place with some libs somewhere, that's all I know.

    4. Re:Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps the person who took the screens simply likes Aqua and therefore used styles and the configurable panel/taskbar to emulate the look of Aqua

      I doubt the KDE-project added a paragraph to the GPL "you only may use themes which look like Aqua"

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    5. Re:Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by NaCh0 · · Score: 1

      Ya, they do. Good luck finding a KDE theme that doesn't look like Macs or Windows.

    6. Re:Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple also uses the KDE JavaScript engine for some of its software. See dot.kde.org for info. I don't remember when the article came out.

    7. Re:Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [x] You never had a look on http://kde-look.org

    8. Re:Is KDE 3.1 a wannabe Aqua? by Macka · · Score: 2

      > Is it me or does this look too much like OS X Aqua??

      It's you. Go buy a pair of glasses.

      This new theme looks nothing like Aqua. It is finally a comprehensive window & widget theme that matches WinXP and Aqua for looks, but is uniquely identifiable as being KDE.

  24. My favorite new things: by friedmud · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the 3.1 feature plan:

    KRfb:
    NEW IN KDE: VNC-compatible server to share KDE desktops
    Remote Desktop Connection (KRdc):
    NEW IN KDE: VNC-compatible client


    Now you don't have to have a seperate instance of KDE running with the vncserver - you can share your CURRENT desktop just like you can with Windows and vnc. This is mucho cool - I will use it often!

    Derek

    1. Re:My favorite new things: by aminorex · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can do this with any X desktop, using x0rfbserver.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    2. Re:My favorite new things: by HeUnique · · Score: 2

      They're not trying to invent something new here - the great thing with this feature is that it's MUCH easier for end user to use without getting the headache of security (it's secured, expires after a period of time, etc)

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
    3. Re:My favorite new things: by friedmud · · Score: 2

      But I don't want to use "x0rfbserver" - I want to use my nvidia server so I can have accelerated graphics - or are the 2 not mutually exclusive (and if not - how does that work?).

      Derek

    4. Re:My favorite new things: by tjansen · · Score: 1

      Actually krfb was a x0rfbserver port, originally. The problem with x0rfbserver is that the codecs are extremely bad compared to newer ones like TightVNC. krfb will use much less bandwidth which is quite important if you use it over a dialup or ISDN connection. And it's also easier to use for end-users, much like WinXP's Remote Assistance.

    5. Re:My favorite new things: by friedmud · · Score: 1

      Ok, looking it up now - it appears that x0rfb just exports the current desktop - meaning it will run alongside my nvidia server - interesting. I would check it out except now I dont have too because I can just use KDE :-)

      Thanks for the tip though - I might use it on machines I don't have kde on.

      Derek

  25. I believe you have been mislead. by Prof+Hugh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Even I, with my superior intelect, was able to spot the obvious "troll" conotations inherent within your previous postings to this esteemed "Slashdot".

    Also, I have just shat my pants. Would you have some tissue upon your person, purchance? Its quite uncomfortable!

    --
    Warm 'n Squishy!
  26. pretty by styk · · Score: 1
    The other night my friend was burning me a CD in X CD Roast, and I made the comment that one day Linux would have pretty widgets one day that were functional.

    We both had a good laugh.

    Seriously though I was a die hard Gnome user, but version 2.0 leaves much to be desired. This new version of KDE looks like, once it is released, it might not feel/look so much like I'm still using windows to actually use it. That has been my main problem with KDE since I first used it back in 1997. I really hope that the desktop kids can continue to go forward, cause that is where the war will be lost or won.

  27. Re:KDE myths by GeekBoy · · Score: 1

    >The KDE project is famous for its funded and organised trolling of weblogs and message board associated with Linux and Free software/open source.

    So are slashdot gnome trolls like youself.

  28. Why oh why?! by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is an ALPHA release. It would be another story if this was a beta and somebody actually wanted to install it.

    --


    Do a google search before posting.
    1. Re:Why oh why?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beta stories are not posted on Slashdot anymore, see rejected KOffice 1.2 beta2 stories.

    2. Re:Why oh why?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This alpha is *more* stable than most betas you have seen from other projects.

  29. A (possibly) more valuable opinion. by minion2 · · Score: 1

    We are all able to dispute and debate which WM looks the best, functions the best, or is just the best. Personally, I like Gnome with Metacity. However, I think that new computer users should have the final say as far as ease-of-use goes.

    As far as looks... the initial impression made can either make or break a user's opinion of a product.

    In a quick test, I set my mom's login (yes, she uses linux! It's great!) to use KDE instead of Gnome. Later, she came up to me and said, "What is going on with the computer?"

    I told her that she was seeing KDE, which was like Gnome - what she used to use, but different.

    "I don't like it. It's ugly. Get rid of it."

    She was quite turned against KDE. Now, I must say that she, before I switched her to Linux, was a mostly unproficient Windows user.

    As nice as I think KDE could be, they really need to work out a less cluttered initial install. Don't know if they've fixed it recently, but I thought my head would explode the first time I loaded it up.

    1. Re:A (possibly) more valuable opinion. by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

      I agree; most of us who configure their desktops until they don't look like anything the developers had in mind often forget that most users won't ever change the defaults. Regardless how cool Liquid, Keramik, transparent menus, ... are they're useless when they aren't used

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  30. Arrrrrgh! Slash Dotted again! by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    The audacity of these people to suck up all of the bandwidth before _I_ have a chance to read the articles! :-)

    All I can say (without actually reading the articles) is: Way to go KDE team. It seems like 3.0 just came out and you guys are already hard at work improving your product! You're doing a great job! Keep it up!!!

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  31. KDE is not that nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a flamebait but I never found KDE to be attractive, I actually find it ugly, I also finds windows extremely ugly.
    An alternative desktop that look completely different but intuitive and productive is the reason I like gnome and dislike KDE.

    1. Re:KDE is not that nice by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

      I find Gnome uncomfortable to work with. It's not that it's a poorly designed desktop it's just that I'm use to KDE.

      I think we all tend to settle into a desktop and that becomes our comfort zone. Both KDE and Gnome have a log going for them.

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  32. Re:Ive been using KDE 3.1 Alpha for some time now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come now, Gnome and KDE have been imitating Windows for some time now, did you just now notice? Yes, this is the first time they've started imitating XP. Did it not bother you as much when they imitated 2000?

    The fact is, KDE and Gnome are both HIGHLY configurable. Anyone in their right mind sets them up in the way that they like best. But both KDE and Gnome know that "intuitive" interfaces don't matter nearly as much as "familiar" interfaces to a newbie.

    Face it, if a Windows user was presented with an intuitive interface, it would take them weeks to get used to it. If we're gonna ease the transition, we default to a Windows style. You ARE free to change it!

  33. leaked you the code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ummm, anyone can download from anon cvs, what leaking was involved?

  34. Re:Ive been using KDE 3.1 Alpha for some time now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surry, but you're obivously lying. For one thing, you can't possibly have a leaked version -- since such a concept can't possibly exist in free software that is openly developed.

    There are also absolutely no changes of the kind you describe to the K Menu -- no split menus, nothing like that, and the K button is still an icon. The default color scheme for the new look is bluish-grey; and has no green in it whatsoever.

  35. KDE is NOT a window manager. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a desktop environment.

  36. Kate == SciTe? by N8F8 · · Score: 1, Troll

    I've been using SciTe editor for about two months now and I the new Kate sure looks a lot like Scite.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Kate == SciTe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been watching the Sci-Fi channel for a few months now, and the main picture on that web site sure looks like A Sci-Fi station identification commercial.

    2. Re:Kate == SciTe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was a developer for Kate a long while back hell I think I even came up with the suggestion of Kate as opposed to Kant. Yes I did look at Scite for it's text highlighting but I didn't "steal" anything from it. I had an itch to scratch... (the syntax rules were "hard-coded" in the source and couldn't be changed easily) so I divorced the syntax rules and started to implement them in an easily changable format (XML) instead of having to recompile everytime you wanted to add a keyword/style. Alas when Kate started to become more of an IDE as opposed to a text editor (I am not saying that that is wrong but IMHO a program should do 1 thing well; not 10 different things because it can) we parted ways. I have the utmost respect for the current crop of developers but they chose to introduce "unneeded fuctionality" and I thought it might be bloated.

    3. Re:Kate == SciTe? by N8F8 · · Score: 1

      SciTe uses a lexer and has different config files with keywords for each language/language group. One of the features I like best is that virtually every option is configurable. Abnother is support for both Win32 languages such as VB/VBScript amd PHP. One thing I don't like is that under Windows it has a wonderful tabbed interface (ala Moz) but under linux it just has buffer forward-back buttons.

      I'll give the new version of Kate a try tho. Thanks for the info.

      --
      "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  37. New look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know judging from the mix of _______ ripoff comments, they may actually have an origional look. Managing to look exactly like all those different OSes is quite a feat.

  38. The Plan by The+Bungi · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    1.- Make Linux desktop look like Microsoft Windows
    2.- ???
    3.- Profit!!!

    I'm not trolling, but I find it sad that everyone has to copy Windows (Microsoft copied Apple, which copied Xerox, blah, blah). Why can't someone come up with a new UI paradigm that works better? If anything, Open Source has the best chance to do this without spending $$$ in "focus groups" and so on. KDE and GNOME look so much like Windows I'm not even inclined to install the latest versions anymore. Not to put down the effort required to code this things, which is of course enormous. I just think the innovation is not there anymore.

    The taskbar-desktop-menu thing should be thrown out. So what if it's a huge change? Most of us will adapt.

    1. Re:The Plan by Dstrct0 · · Score: 1

      I know it's "just" a wm for Gnome, but I think Enlightenment fits the bill here.

      Click-based navigation (no unnecessary desktop menu button), customizable, doesn't look much like windows to me :)

      --
      Build boards not bombs
    2. Re:The Plan by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Those are a bit better (and far easy on the machine). I like Blackbox myself. But they still stick to the same paradigms, IMO.

      I don't know how the alternative would look of course... If I did I would be sitting on a beach, earning 15% =)

      But I'm sure it doesn't look like the stuff we have now.

    3. Re:The Plan by sithlord2 · · Score: 1


      I'm not trolling, but I find it sad that everyone has to copy Windows (Microsoft copied Apple, which copied Xerox, blah, blah).

      Because everybody knows how to use Windows.

      Why can't someone come up with a new UI paradigm that works better?

      Now I keep hearing this alot. What is a "new UI paradigm" ?? Personally, The "click-with-the-mouse-on-a-window"-paradigm works pretty well for me.
      What would be a better system ? Please enlighten me...

      --
      ...You are over-qualified and under-paid. If we give you a raise, we will break the cosmic balance of the universe.
    4. Re:The Plan by bilbobuggins · · Score: 2
      I'm not trolling, but I find it sad that everyone has to copy Windows (Microsoft copied Apple, which copied Xerox, blah, blah).

      Until you actually suggest a new paradigm yourself you are absolutely, most certainly, beyond a doubt, trolling.
      Those in glass houses yada yada...

    5. Re:The Plan by spitzak · · Score: 2
      I'll suggest a change that would make Linux much superior to Windows because it will allow programs to use multiple overlapping windows:

      DON'T RAISE WINDOWS UNLESS THE USER CLICKS ON THE BORDER!!!!

      By this I mean:

      1. When the user clicks in a window, give it the focus, but DONT RAISE IT.

      2. (less obvious but NO modern window managers do this) When the user raises a "child" window, DO NOT RAISE THE PARENT!!!! This is the real killer that makes it impossible to have overlapping windows of any substantial size.

      3. Provide a way to move windows around without raising them. For instance, why not the way X window managers worked for a decade before people starting thinking copying MicroSoft was kool: if the user drags the border, move the window and DO NOT RAISE IT, if they click they can raise it. Modern window managers seem to be unable to do this correctly, the KDE I am using cannot do this unless you turn off all ability to raise the windows.

      I really really wish some of these people would do this. I do not believe it will "confuse" the amateur user, and it would allow some user interface designs that cannot be done with Windows. Mostly it would allow a single object to be controlled by 2 or more large "views" that overlap on the screen in different windows.

      On another point, please test everything under point-to-type. If a program grabs the focus it should warp the mouse to point at it (after first making absolutely positively sure you really really really want to grab the focus).

    6. Re:The Plan by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      1. When the user clicks in a window, give it the focus, but DONT RAISE IT.

      This exact feature was the reason why I switched from Windows to KDE1 back in 1998.

      Now you have demonstrated that you have never used KDE, what was your point again?

    7. Re:The Plan by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Until you actually suggest a new paradigm yourself you are absolutely, most certainly, beyond a doubt, trolling.

      And unless you have something intelligent to say, or are otherwise inclined to insult me properly or just FOAD, please keep your insight to yourself. I forget where in the TOS (or whatever passes for that here) it says "all posts should include a heavy dose of valid arguments. Otherwise don't bother".

      If it's so damn complicated for you to understand I was merely voicing a simple thought then you're absolutely, most certainly, beyond a doubt, stupid.

    8. Re:The Plan by bilbobuggins · · Score: 1
      alright, point taken...

      my problem with your post is this: lots of people complain about things (especially software) without seeming to have any real reason to do so or without offering any help. basically this just makes life harder for other people and helps no one. if you are in are in the tech field (i assume you are) you've probably at one point had user X make vague demands of you like 'why doesn't it look better?...' (note, no _real_ suggestion offered) or other such completely subjective comments that lead to nothing getting done as we all go on a wild goose chase to make a piece of software 'better' with no real definition of what that is. in short, i found your criticism of KDE completely unconstructive.

      secondly, KDE/Gnome has copied MS for a simple reason: MS etc. puts real time and money into trying UI concepts out and seeing what works. the resulting interface seems to be useful for pretty much everyone.
      so in MY opinion shying away from already existing knowledge in the field and chasing after a vague undefined holy grail of interface design seems like it would be the worst way to spend time for any linux desktop developer.
      yes, you are completely entitled to any opinion, i happen to consider what you said more akin to flamebait.
      if you DO come up with a new better paradigm, then i'm sure i will appreciate it along with everyone else but until that time i think you see where i'm coming from...

  39. Re:Ive been using KDE 3.1 Alpha for some time now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol.. what a troll.. 'leaked the source code'.. *cough* cvs *cough*.. and who the fuck uses 800x640 anyways? buy another monitor you poor smelly GNU hippie

  40. Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is only a test

  41. Debian by jchawk · · Score: 2

    Is debian ever going to have an official package? Did I just miss something? Seems like I've been waiting forever.

    1. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, usually debian is the first distro to have alpha packages. Maybe you should ask the kde packager what is taking him so damn long. They need to hire somebody faster, I think.

    2. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no kidding...

      Debian "unstable" is still on KDE 2

      I've been waiting... and waiting

    3. Re:Debian by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Try adding something like

      deb http://kde3.geniussystems.net/debian/ ./

      or

      deb http://kde.ping.uio.no/i386 ./

      in your /etc/apt/sauces.list. That should do the trick. These are semi-official packages, or beta releases of the packages that will go into sid after woody releases.

    4. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Debian "stable" has no KDE at all.

    5. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they wont.. The official KDE3 package is postponed until after woody is released. In other words: never!

    6. Re:Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ apt-get install konqueror
      Reading Package Lists... Done
      Building Dependency Tree... Done
      The following extra packages will be installed:
      kdeartwork-style kdelibs4 libarts1 libarts1-qt libkonq4 libqt3 libqt3-mt
      The following packages will be REMOVED:
      kdelibs3 kdelibs3-bin libarts libwine wine wine-utils
      The following NEW packages will be installed:
      kdelibs4 konqueror libarts1 libarts1-qt libkonq4 libqt3 libqt3-mt
      1 packages upgraded, 7 newly installed, 6 to remove and 11 not upgraded.
      Need to get 13.7MB of archives. After unpacking 1872kB will be freed.

      ummm remove wine? why do that?

    7. Re:Debian by MrHanky · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not without problems, which might partly explain why it's still not in main. AFAIR, it has something to do with libarts. KDE3 includes/depends on libarts1, which replaces and conflicts with libarts, and wine depends on libarts >= something. Or something like that.

      If you can't live without wine, you should wait for KDE3 to be put in main. It's not that much of an upgrade from 2.2 anyway.

  42. Seems that nobody here will admit - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that they badmouth eyecandy and fluff, but darn near everyone of you run KDE (or decorate any WM it seems) trying to copy the look & feel of the big players (MS & Apple).

    But we all know that it's like masturbation, or picking your nose...most people just won't admit it, but everybody does it. Keep on imitating, guys, and then wonder why nobody takes you seriously when you cry out "but...but MS hasn't innovated anything ....they just took it from Linux/BeOS/Mac/whogivesacrapOS"

  43. Quit Slashdotting the sites damn it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit Slashdotting the site damn it.

  44. New Look by Ween · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After looking at the new screenshots, I can honestly say that this will be the first KDE which I will not have to alter the look of significantly from the default install. This will mean good things for people unaware of kde-look.org and other enhancements that are 3rd party to kde. KDE will finally look very polished and professional (if not a little bit over the top like XP .. but definately far more attractive than XP).

    --


    Tis better to be silent and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt --Abraham Lincoln
  45. Forget eye candy, we want Usability and Effeciency by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    What does beautiful eye candy help you if it works slow?

    I have a Linux box and a WinXP box. When I installed the XP, the first thing I did was to remove all the useless eyecandy, such as fading in and out. It only makes menus slower to get to. The whole XP UI seems slower and heavier than before, with no improvment in usability..

    I don't want to see this happening to KDE. I want the UI to work fast and smart.

    --
    ^_^
  46. Re:Ive been using KDE 3.1 Alpha for some time now by zdzichu · · Score: 1

    because my friend works for KDE, and he leaked me the code.

    isn't KDE free software project? You can get the code by yourself from CVS. You don't have to have someone 'leaking' the code.

    --
    :wq
  47. Drop Shadows by baboon · · Score: 1

    I remember an Amiga utility to do drop shadows on all the windows. It looked really cool, but was too slow for regular use.

    It looks like this KDE effect is only for menus, which seems to reduce the impact. Also, on the Amiga utility, they gave each level of height a progressively wider shadow (and they casted relatively onto each other). That looked much more natural and gave a believable impression of many floating platforms.

    1. Re:Drop Shadows by spitzak · · Score: 2
      The trick for the drop shadows only works if the window will not be moved and there will be no change to the display below the window until it disappears. For this reason it is only good for pop-up (and pull-down) menus, and perhaps for tooltips.

      What really is happening is the window is somewhat larger than it looks, it includes a bottom and right edge that have been painted with an image that looks just like what is behind it plus a shadow.

    2. Re:Drop Shadows by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      and why can't you do something like that with transparency or alpha blending and just repaint the window every time there is a desktop change?

      I'm not big on GUI programming so i might be completely off here, but couldn't you just catch any signals of something happening on the desktop and have it redraw the shadowing whenver something on the desktop changes?
      while it may take CPU horsepower, that may only be an issue when dragging windows around in which case you could do something ala windows where it just drags the border of the window until you set it down...
      I may be way off on this, but I don't think that the idea should be tossed aside so cavalierly...

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    3. Re:Drop Shadows by spitzak · · Score: 2
      The reason you can't do this is X lacks any way to find out what the other application tried to draw on the obscured portion of the window. All such drawing is clipped and thrown away by the X server.

      If you ignore changes, you could in theory allow the window to drag by remembering the entire screen initially and continuously redrawing the shadowed part. But I think the "real" edge would quickly become visible because the changing image would not be in sync with the window movement.

  48. Re:Desktop sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Did anyone notice the desktop sharing "feature" in KDE? Is this VNC compatible?

    Comic reader? There were not only pictures but an announcement, how about reading it? It contains the answer.

  49. It actually stands for KDE Desktop Environment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go figure :)

  50. Re:It actually stands for KDE Desktop Environment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it does now, but it was the Kool Desktop Environment. Do a google for it.

  51. Re:Ive been using KDE 3.1 Alpha for some time now by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

    Interesting...a Linux "master" that thinks it's possible to "leak" KDE code....

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  52. Mirror of screenshots site by idiot900 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've set up a mirror of the screenshots site:


    http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/users/tom/kde31alpha/

    Enjoy!

    1. Re:Mirror of screenshots site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thanks!

      (lameness filter of filter clean my coffee filter)

  53. Re:Desktop sharing? by tjansen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is fully VNC compatible and supports the latest codecs.

  54. Fresco by extrasolar · · Score: 2
    "Um. Pardon me, but how else are you supposed to render translucent objects?"

    I think he means like this.

    1. Re:Fresco by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      "Um. Pardon me, but how else are you supposed to render translucent objects?"

      I think he means like this [fresco.org].

      Okay, very nice. Now, how does that render translucent objects *other* than using either hardware or software?

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Fresco by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      I think you are, perhaps intentionally, misunderstanding the spirit of the statement. If you are seriously uncertain, you can email me at klh@wildapache.net .

  55. Evolution of Software by peterdaly · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am already starting to see comments in this thread like "feature X is just a ripp-off of product Y", who decided to put in feature Z, I hate it", etc. I just finished reading Survival Is Not Enough, by Seth Godin, who is a former Executive at Yahoo, among other things. These complaints are features that really should be applauded instead. Which criticizm is good, just the fact that a feature is similar to something else another product has is not bad.

    Much of the book has to do with the evolution of products suchs as web sites and software. Evolution happens in software just like in life forms. Much of the book pushes the idea of making as many "mutations" in a short time with as little money as possible. Let the bad ones die, keep the good ones. If another product has a feature that works well, why not use as much of the basic concept as possible. Image what the word processor world be like to day if none of the publishers used features other software had already implemented. Cross polination in evolutionary terms. This is along the lines of the tabbed browsing in Konquer, and the "Qwertz" toolbar thing.

    The rant about the stupid KDE clipboard function? I admit, I don't use the feature either. Is it bad it was put in? No. As many "test" features as possible should be put into the public view to see which are good and which are bad. The good features will stay, the bad will be phased out. These "mutations" of the core are what helps create innovative features. Who knows, someday a desktop envirnment might be considered horrible if it doesn't have whatever the KDE clipboard thing does. (I don't even KNOW what it is supposed to do, which may be more the problem.)

    These are not bad, and in my mind should be encouraged of both the Gnome team and the KDE team. As many people here know, innovation happens much faster when there are competing technologies, and not just a big monopoly in any given market.

    -Pete
    (Book link is an affiliate link...I read the book and liked it. I think you will too.)

    1. Re:Evolution of Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if the clipboard then showes to be a pain in the arse, the whole KDE project has to crashland because they won't remove a 'innovative feature'?
      I HATE IT, I HATE IT, I HATE IT.
      It is not small things that will send new users screaming away.
      I just tried MacOS X yesterday - some thing I liked, and some thing i didn't.
      But none of there 'features' wasn't as horrible as that clippy thing.

    2. Re:Evolution of Software by peterdaly · · Score: 2

      You can use Windows instead if you so desire. It seems to have a much more conservative approach to innovation and a much more mature GUI envirnment than Linux.

      -Pete

    3. Re:Evolution of Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which criticizm is good

      It's criticism. What a poor speller.

      ;)

    4. Re:Evolution of Software by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      I am already starting to see comments in this thread like "feature X is just a ripp-off of product Y", who decided to put in feature Z, I hate it", etc.

      It gets worse. They clearly ripped off the idea of displaying characters on screen from Xerox! Remove it - now!

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  56. VNC with compression? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Wonder what branch of vnc they used..

    Great to see in included, one less thing to have to install manually afterwards ( and not integrate well afterwards anyway )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:VNC with compression? by tjansen · · Score: 2

      The server uses libvncserver which has a quite complex history, but supports TightVNC. The client is based on TightVNC's clients, but with many new goodies.

    2. Re:VNC with compression? by CJ+Hooknose · · Score: 2

      Don't know about the VNC client (if there is any, it would be cool to be able to enter "vnc://password@111.222.111.222" into Konqueror, for sure) but the VNC-server that's in KDE 3.1 was released for KDE2 and KDE 3.0 as "krfb", and it worked pretty well--I'm running it on my laptop right now. Google for "krfb" and you'll find it.

      --
      Give a monkey a brain and he'll swear he's the center of the universe.
    3. Re:VNC with compression? by tjansen · · Score: 1

      if there is any, it would be cool to be able to enter "vnc://password@111.222.111.222" into Konqueror, for sure
      You can, but the syntax is vnc://somenamethatwillbeignored:password@111.222.1 11.222
      (if you just write someword@address it is a username, not a password)

  57. Re:Ive been using KDE 3.1 Alpha for some time now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything that you talk about is configurable, even your level of anti-aliasing.

    I think that you are just being a troll. If you don't like it, write your own.

    Fuck off, Linux master.

  58. question about KDE, from a Gnome user by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    Looking at these new screenshots, I can see that the KDE developers are improving the look/feel of KDE recently, which is very good because frankly I found it rather ugly.

    One thing that keeps from from giving KDE much attention is a small pet peeve of mine. The task list, I absolutely hate task lists, it's absolutely the the epitome of bad interface design. You have a horizontal list of application names, which are variable sizes, and the more you have the smaller they can be... ugg, disgusting.

    So, my question is, does KDE have any type of drop down task switcher, a la MacOS Thanks

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      Yes.
      I'm at work so I can't give you the exact configuration instructions; but from the keyboard shortcuts control panel in kcontrol, you can set up a keyboard accel to give you a task list.

      Mine is set to alt-esc -- and accordingly I pulled the tasklist out of kicker, which I always thought was bad design too. Now, I just hit alt-esc and I get of list of running apps, segregated by desktop. I can click on any one (or nav by keyboard arrows) and it will switch to the right desktop and bring that app to the front.

      It's very, *very* nice.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    2. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
      Interesting, any way to make this a drop down menu, like in Gnome? Sure would be nice.

      Thanks though, I'll give that a try next time I check out KDE.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    3. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by orcrist · · Score: 1

      One thing that keeps from from giving KDE much attention is a small pet peeve of mine. The task list, I absolutely hate task lists, it's absolutely the the epitome of bad interface design.

      I guess you only ever looked at screenshots then, since the taskbar has been removable since 2.0 (October 23, 2000). I don't know what MacOS' drop down task switcher looks like but KDE has had something similar for its whole existence AFAIK.

      No offence but it looks like the thing keeping you from using KDE is an unwillingness to try a new Desktop out; granted you might still not like it after trying, but KDE it highly configurable, and you might want to at least ask what's possible, if not try what's possible before you complain.

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    4. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      Yes, There is an icon box - type Kicker extention very simmilar to the one in E, I was using it for a while. It shows only the icons of the open windows, and can be set to be transparant. I forget th enam eif it.. but just go through the kicker rxtentions and it is there somewhere. And you can simply remove the task list, it is just a Kicker applet.

    5. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Personally, although I run KDE, I still like the gnome system manager. It runs with no problems under KDE, as long as you have gnome libs installed too.

    6. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      There has ALWAYS been one in kde....right from 1.x

      You could add a window list button to your panel, or middle click on the desktop

      You can still do both of those, but there's also (Sinse 2.x) KasBar, which is an icon box style list.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    7. Re:question about KDE, from a Gnome user by stilborne · · Score: 1

      right click on the panel (kicker), select Add -> Special Button -> Window List ... tada! a button with a menu that shows you your tasks!

  59. one thing I still want to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when are we gonna be able to cut and paste more than just plaintext?

  60. not to point out the obvious, but... by naasking · · Score: 1

    why not?

  61. question about KDE, from a Gnome user by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Looking at these new screenshots, I can see that the KDE developers are improving the look/feel of KDE recently, which is very good because frankly I found it rather ugly.

    One thing that keeps me from from giving KDE much attention is a small pet peeve of mine. The task list, I absolutely hate task lists, it's absolutely the the epitome of bad interface design. You have a horizontal list of application names, which are variable sizes, and the more you have the smaller they can be... ugg, disgusting.

    So, my question is, does KDE have any type of drop down task switcher, a la MacOS<=9.x and Gnome? Or an icon box a la OSX and Enlightenment? I simply cannot stand the windows style taskbar, it's... you get the idea...

    Thanks

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  62. update, MaxClients 800 by navindra · · Score: 1

    title says it all, increased MaxClients to 800. but looks like they are quickly being used. :-)

  63. Re: Try Fluxbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    http://fluxbox.sourceforge.net/ - it's small it's efficient and blazingly fast and it looks good (the few bits you see).

    Try it, you'll love it!

  64. KAudioCreator by IceFox · · Score: 4, Informative
    As many of you know kde2->3 was not much for eye candy and was more underneith and even then was mainly bug fixes. 3.1 was the first time that developers got to put up new stuff. One of the least known new items is KAudioCreator which is a ogg/mp3/everything audio ripping tool. From the website:

    KAudioCreator is an audio file creation solution for kde. It allows you to use whatever encoder you wish to encode your audio files while providing a comfortable gui. KAudioCreator also provides a job control system so you can see what files have succeeded, failed and stop or cancel jobs as the application progresses.

    Screenshots!

    and for those kde 2 users I have back ported it to kde2 and put it on my webpage. -Benjamin Meyer

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  65. Re:KDE keeps getting better or is that bigger? by pdqlamb · · Score: 2

    How much memory does it take to run KDE nowadays? It seems to be keeping pace with Winblows (NTM) as a prime example of bloatware.

  66. They need OSX like eyecandy by HanzoSan · · Score: 2


    Alpha Channel / Transparency

    Genie effect or equally impressive effects.

    They seriously need to get 4-5 developers working on a project with just THAT specific purpose, of improving the eyecandy in KDE. OR maybe someone like Lindows can fund development of xfree86's render extention.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:They need OSX like eyecandy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      HanzoSan runs on at the mouth a lot. Saying something once is enough for most people, but noooo, not HanzoDork

  67. More Eyecandy by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    We need more eyecandy if KDE is supposed to ever be better than OSX or even XP, better icon animation (its a good start but improve on it and make it more useful)

    Alpha channel, so we can have a alpha channeled kicker and panel

    Some cool special effects, like genie effect or even motion blur,

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:More Eyecandy by MaxVlast · · Score: 1, Troll

      Um, I thought that eye candy was a waste of processor cycles. And alpha channels caused users to have to buy the biggest video cards around, and were evil because the guy with a ten year old machine under his desk would have to buy a seven year old machine.

      Or is that just when the operating system that you can't have does it that's a waste and stupid?

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    2. Re:More Eyecandy by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



      Only programmers care about processor cycles.

      Most desktop users who just run word and a webbrowser, they dont care about processor cycles, they arent compiling code.

      So waste? waste is what programmers who have to save their precious little CPU cycles to compile their little kernel a few minutes faster care about. Not someone whos just surfing the web downloading mp3s and chatting.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:More Eyecandy by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

      Some of us like wasting processor cycles that way.

      I think this should be optional, btw. Linux is Linux whether it's running on an 8MHz 386 with four megs of RAM or a 3Ghz Pentium 4 with four gigs of RAM.

  68. The "Keramik" look works with 3.0, as well as 3.1 by Queuetue · · Score: 2

    If you're just after the eye candy, you can download a srpm of the keramik theme here:

    http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=219 3

    or a tarball here:

    http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=219 4

  69. So basically by RatFink100 · · Score: 1, Troll

    KDE now wants to look like a cross between XP and OSX.

    Which is fine if you like that I guess.

    1. Re:So basically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you like that sort of thing. It's fine, I guess.

    2. Re:So basically by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Bashers have problems distinguishing "have to" and "be able to"

      Just because you are able to recompile the kernel doesn't mean you have to.

      Just because you are able to update KDE/Linux every month, doesn't mean you have to.

      Just because KDE can look like OSX doesn't mean it has to

      Got my message? Well, probably not, whatever.

    3. Re:So basically by RatFink100 · · Score: 2

      I can distinguish between those two concepts just fine and I'm not a 'basher'.

      I was commenting on the default theme and toolbar configuration - as displayed in the screenshot.

      For many that will be "the look of KDE"

      If the KDE developers wanted to establish a dramatically different look and feel from those other OS GUIs they would have done so in the default setup. They obviously didn't.

      As I said - if that's what you like then fine.

    4. Re:So basically by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      And if you don't - that's fine too. There come several styles in the default configuration.

    5. Re:So basically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I was commenting on the default theme and toolbar configuration - as displayed in the screenshot.

      Default configuration will not have desktop menu enabled, no less than 100% wide and centered or at the side sitting panel. What is shown is the preferable configuration of the person who took the screenshots.

  70. KDE project I never want to see by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2, Funny

    The PaperKlip.

    This is a software agent that determines what kind of task you're trying to do, pops up, and provides "helpful" advice. Like the MS Office Paperclip agent, the advice isn't that great, and it's a HUGE burden on resources. Unlike the MS Office Paperclip agent, it provides "helpful" advice for the ENTIRE KDE project.

    Mandrake users will love it; Debian users will want to destroy the author on sight. The author will show up to LUG meetings with a fake beard and sunglasses.

    1. Re:KDE project I never want to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really hope it is off by default. But then again, people would never turn it on...

  71. What Eye Candy? OSX kicks its ass by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    I'm sorry but KDE has a long long way to go before impressing anyone with its eye candy.

    why even bother showing off eye candy when its just drop shadows or anti aliased fonts,

    The animated icons was a good start, they should improve that so for example you can take a gaim icon or instant message icon from your desktop and put it on your panel somewhere and when you get a msg it animates, or when its on your desktop and you get a msg it animates.

    When you put a Cd in the CD drive, the CD icon should appear and begin to spin, to animate whats happenining. Basically they should let our actions influence the animations, more so than just a random animation when you put your mouse over it. Maybe an animation when you actually click it, or if you modify a folder somehow like lock or unlock it, the animation should occur with the lock being slapped on the folder.

    Animations is something that OSX and XP does not do, so why not improve that?

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:What Eye Candy? OSX kicks its ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, get yourself a game console instead of trying to invent the dumbest desktop on earth.

    2. Re:What Eye Candy? OSX kicks its ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit. All these weenies whining for fucking eye candy on their desktops can kiss my ass. Computers are supposed to be clean, fast, and above all functional... NOT replicas of those fake hollywood-style computers.

    3. Re:What Eye Candy? OSX kicks its ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's why apple and ms spend a fortune on usability - your eye is sensitive to movement - if you chuck animations all over the place most users will find them incredibly distracting. with ui design, especially, just because something CAN be done doesn't mean it SHOULD be done.

    4. Re:What Eye Candy? OSX kicks its ass by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

      Whilst its place wouldn't really be inside KDE, some kind of standard central `hardware/os events daemon' to which process can attach themselves
      is a must. What is required is the ability to
      be able to say `watch the CD; tell me when it is inserted/removed/whatever', 'tell me if this folder gets modified', etc. Yes I know this can be done via various approaches/workarounds, but for each and every application author to do this is rather wasteful.

      --
      John_Chalisque
  72. KDE will be "breathtaking"... by badfish2 · · Score: 0, Troll

    When most of its bugs are quashed. Until then, it's more of a pain in the ass than it is half the adjectives you used to describe it, and not worth the pain trying to install.

    --
    "On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog!" - a dog
  73. What KDE stands for by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 3, Funny

    KDE stands for: (The) Kalle Dalheimer Experience ;)

    ghobe' bIlughbe' ji-bIlugh Klingon Desktop Environment

    naDev tlhInganpu' tu'lu' yaj'a' majQa'

    1. Re:What KDE stands for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ghobe' bIlughbe' ji-bIlugh Klingon Desktop Environment

      That would explain why using KDE is like listening to Klingon opera.

      (Oh MAN is this flamebait. I think I'll post this anonymously!)

  74. Lovely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pleased to see that a lot of linux users are starting to like KDE now. I've been using it on my desktop for about a year and a half. It used to be ugly, but with the liquid theme my computer looks gorgeous! (Yes, I'm afraid I like my computer to look good. Sorry TWM fans. Although I remember first loading up X on my 486 and being really impressed that it looked just like X on university Solaris boxes...)

  75. They NEED to also enhance their icon animations by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    First, we should be able to set the max framerate of the animations.

    Second developers should be able to create animations so programs illustrate our actions.

    You put a CD in your CD rom and its a game CD, you should see maybe a little light or flash on the desktop which turns into a little spinning CD, if the game programmers wrote an animation for their icon, the doom CD could have an animated icon of the devil or whatever.

    Or you could set it up so when you run a program the icon animate.

    When you burn a CD a spinning burning CD animation could appear, why would this be useful? someone who doesnt know a damn thing about computers could look at that burning spinning Cd icon and know what the computer is doing without opening up any programs.

    Animation is what seperates OSX from linux, the genie effect, alpha channeling, that extra level of overkill eyecandy is what people want and need for ease of use.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:They NEED to also enhance their icon animations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > When you burn a CD a spinning burning CD animation could appear, why would this be useful? someone who doesnt know a damn thing about computers could look at that burning spinning Cd icon and know what the computer is doing without opening up any programs.

      You mean, besides opening the CD burner program that's already opened? The one currently burning that CD?..

    2. Re:They NEED to also enhance their icon animations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You repeat yourself. I wonder why you have default charma.

  76. awesome backgrounds by gregfortune · · Score: 2

    I can only see glimpses of the backgrounds in the last 6 screenshots, but they rock! Any one have any idea where I can grab them (besides checking out the KDE tree...)????

    1. Re:awesome backgrounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try www.deskmod.com....

      Some cool Bg there...

    2. Re:awesome backgrounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also try www.deviantart.com

  77. Even, what about improving icon animation by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    IF you say its a video card issue, how about improving the animated icons, I'm not talking about going overboard, but allowing the user to decide the frame rate, allowing our actions to decide the animations of an icon, so an icon can have several diffrent animations, cd icon should have a music cd animation, a burning cd animation for burning, a game cd animation, a dvd movie animation, so anyone who doesnt know computers can understand what is going on by looking at the icon animate.

    I'm talking about improving the animation in terms of frames per second,, doing that would do alot for eyecandy and ease of use, if its done right.

    Xfree can support this, people have the ram to do it, and the cpu power but if they dont, they should be able to decide the frame rate just like the decide the icon sizes.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Even, what about improving icon animation by JabberWokky · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well, this is an issue totally unrelated to X or video drivers - it's easily doable, but...

      they should be able to decide the frame rate [ of the icons]

      Who? The creator of the icon can do that right now - the icons are MNG files (the animated form of PNG files), and they have a framerate set inside them. What you want is for the desktop user to be able to override that? I suppose it's possible, but I for one just don't see it as a desirable feature.

      As for having several different animations based on status, there has been some talk of that (Mosfet at one point discussed it, and he's got some code for animated widgets written, but not, afaik for animated icons). While a developer might suddenly write it, I'd think that to do it right (maybe a .desktop file with scripted dcop calls?) would entail enough time to a stable product that it's unlikely to appear in the very near future. The framework is there, but there's not much demand from the application authors for such an ability.

      The fact that it's getting down to such minor details ("I want to globally set the framerate on the animated icons") shows that it's a mature desktop. (Incidently, if you *really* want to change the framerate, you can always open the icons in an editor, change the framerate and save them... Me? One of the first things I do on a new KDE desktop is turn the animations *off*. They bug me... and there's a nice, easy setting for that in the Control Center)

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Even, what about improving icon animation by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

      Who? The creator of the icon can do that right now - the icons are MNG files (the animated form of PNG files), and they have a framerate set inside them. What you want is for the desktop user to be able to override that? I suppose it's possible, but I for one just don't see it as a desirable feature.


      But I the user cannot set the frame rate.Whos computer will be rendering these frames? Mine. So why shouldnt I decide the max amount? If i can change my icon sizes and my screen resolution it only makes sense.

      Theres not going to be demand from application authors because application authors cant demand something thats this new.

      Its kinda like how the industry didnt demand peer to peer until after napster was made. You have the technology, now we need some ways for developers to take advantage of it, then the demand will come, not from developers but from the users who will then create developer damand.

      Kinda like alpha channel, developers dont care about that its the users who demand that.

      Yeah KDE is mature, we arent even debating that, the problem with KDE is, while its mature, its still not at the level of OSX. OSX still has it beat in terms of ease of use, eye candy etc, to beat OSX it needs animated icons, SVG icons, alpha channel, and great usability and functionality, If KDE developers focus on the small details (which is what KDE lacks right now) KDE could be competiting with OSX in about a year.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:Even, what about improving icon animation by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      to beat OSX it needs animated icons, SVG icons, alpha channel

      Done, done and done. All three are part of the 3.x series release... these features are at the "they work" level, and are still getting polish each minor release (SVG support is brand new with this upcoming release).

      But I the user cannot set the frame rate.Whos computer will be rendering these frames? Mine. So why shouldnt I decide the max amount?

      You *can* - on an icon by icon level. Can you even set the global animation speed of icons in OSX or XP? I'm sorry, but I really don't see why you would want to. But it's a really really minor thing - I've checked, and there *is* a value that controls minimum interval of animation to prevent an icon with a interval value of zero from killing performance. It's set to a very low (non zero) value. If you really wanted to, you could set up a slider in the Control Center to set that value... but...

      IMO, that starts cluttering the Control Center with minutae that isn't necessary in the default KDE installation. Now, if you want to write a panel for the Control Center that edits that, you can easily release a "TweakUI" or "PowerTools" style package that adds stuff like that to the Control Center - one that I use adds a Matrox specific panel that lets me set all sorts of Matrox G4x0 specific settings. A Matrox specific panel would hardly be of use to the users in general... but I like it. I'd personally class your request as something like that. Easily done, but useless clutter except for those few who really want to control every variable on their system. In which case, an addon panel of PowerUser UI settings that goes into the Control Center makes much more sense.

      --
      Evan "Need I add that these are all just my opinions?"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:Even, what about improving icon animation by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

      As an immediate thought, allowing a user configurable constant multiplier for the
      ticks-per-second variable in the MNG header
      would be possible and (hopefully)
      rather straightforward. Allowing the ticks-per-second to be uniformly set or bounded could lead to silly differences in speeds between animations.

      --
      John_Chalisque
  78. graphics editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody know what graphics editor is used to create the icons and other graphics in KDE? The Gimp?

  79. SVG icons by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2

    Wasn't KDE 3.1 supposed to bring SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) icons / wigets? That'd be so shweeeet...

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
    1. Re:SVG icons by tjansen · · Score: 2

      SVG icons are supported. But there is no SVG icon set ATM.

    2. Re:SVG icons by yobbo · · Score: 2

      The connectiva crystal icon set will be SVG icons, and the developer Everaldo intends on having the icon set finished in time for conclusion in KDE 3.1

      In the mean time you can see a non installable preview here:

      http://kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=240 8& PHPSESSID=e0b34b211f0ee114b78ea85bf80b4bf2

    3. Re:SVG icons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in time for *inclusion* ...must ...learn ...to ...proof ...read

  80. Re:The "Keramik" look works with 3.0, as well as 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an older, buggier version than in the alpha. Don't complaint if e.g. buttons on webpages are missing.

  81. Wonderful new eye candy? by Trogre · · Score: 1

    I really wish they would give less priority to dollying up the interface and putting more effort into stability.

    Last night when I was sorting through some archive folders on my hard drive the konqueror segfaulted on me no less than three times within an hour; and that was just doing bog-standard folder move and delete operations!!!

    Until such show-stoppers like this are rectified, kde CANNOT become a viable alternative to a bash prompt.

    Also I would like the ability to control exactly what needs to be double-clicked (desktop icons, konqueror objects) and what doesn't (menu branches), but that's just me.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Wonderful new eye candy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is in fact the problem with Linux as a whole. It takes very little pushing to completely break almost any part of it. With any luck a company like IBM will take over enough of it to actually make it into something that more than 2% of the population will want to use. I may be dead before that happens though.

    2. Re:Wonderful new eye candy? by redtuxxx · · Score: 0

      crap - you use kde too much

  82. No by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

    The Slashdot community doesn't help. After all, all "the Slashdot community" does is flaming, trolling, bitching about how *BSD is dead, and advertising for goatse.cx.
    Have you ever seen how many posts are moderated -1? And how many users *only* have posts that are -1? "A lot" is an understatement.

  83. ALL RESPONDENTS HBT. YHL. HAND. JACKASSES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys are so fucking stupid...getting so angry over an obvious troll...heh...what a bunch of fucking 15-year-old slashbot tools you are.

  84. have you been reading? or just "looking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can tell you have spent zero time w/MacOSX.
    It's more than just looks, pal. Take my word, it does feel different. Some parts will take getting used to (most complaints are from people who instantl;y start using it like win/kde/wm/whatever and then bitch cause it doesn't imitate their other WM's down to every detail...pretty myopic if you ask me), but some parts will definitely feel better to you after time, and some may never change.
    I'm just trying to say it's not just look, but feel. Don't discount that unless you have spent a fair amount of time learning (not just using) MacOSX. Seems most people here at /. just complain about copycats, especially when MS takes an idea....ahem...innovates, yet have no problems taking from anywhere they please when it suits them (just look at themes/liquid, tabbed apps from BeOS YEARS ago, etc). Funny....most zealots 'round here wear their "individuality" around here like a badge of courage, but after a bit, you all look and sound alike anyway....emulation is the sincerest form of flattery.

  85. The best looking desktop ever by DrunkenPenguin · · Score: 1

    OK, this is objective opinion. Why don't you all just check out the best looking desktop there is! I've also got Mac, but I got to admit, this beats it all the way.

    1. Re:The best looking desktop ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bright to be functional.

  86. -- bigger, better, and lighter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think that KDE 3 has a higher memory footprint than KDE 2.whatever, i'd advise you to do some measurements. It has dropped since then. Of course, you can't expect KDE to be as lightweight as stuff like twm, but that's only normal, right ?
    PS. if you don't like it, start a lightweight version of KDE by throwing all features out. I think i read about someone doing something like this for Qt/Embedded...
    cheers
    domi

  87. wow, you're hung up on those icons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  88. Hey mods, this sounds like a valid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not mine, see parent..I can't say as I use a Mac

  89. How about getting off yer duff and doing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    instead of complaining?

    Hope this helps =}

  90. overrated?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod this guys post up.... the "over rated" mod (twice) is unfair.... A 10+ post discussion speaks to that.

  91. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you're entitled to your own opinion..uggh I say

  92. Aren't Linux coders overlooking this...? by sardaukar_siet · · Score: 1

    I told some Linux zealots about this before, but no one seems to care... what about FONTS?! Why is text on Linux so ugly? Forget AAsing, the fonts are just plain UGLY. Why? Is it so hard to draw new ones and include them? I feel forced to use M$'s Tahoma on my KDE3 desktop and it finally looks great. Why? WHY? :)

    1. Re:Aren't Linux coders overlooking this...? by tjansen · · Score: 1

      Yes, good fonts are extremely difficult to make and VERY expensive. Feel free to create one, many people will love you for this.

    2. Re:Aren't Linux coders overlooking this...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because programmers doesnt create fonts.

      artists create fonts

  93. Re: WinME keeps looking better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn --- WinME RulZ.

  94. Re:KDE keeps getting better or is that bigger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have to ask how much memory KDE uses, how the fuck can you claim it's bloatware when you clearly haven't got a clue?

  95. Re:How to install proprietary software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hummmm .. is this what they call proprietary software, cause only the proprieters can use it ??? What's that you say -- not another leaky M$ beta? How can a Lusr tell the difference? Oh yeah thanks, so it's free also ...

  96. Re:Forget eye candy, we want Usability and Effecie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The improvement in useabllity in XP is in the low end user land. For power users, the new usability is just in the way. But as you said it can all be turned off again if you know what you are doing (and a power user should know what they are doing).

    As far as power user tools, there are about 10,000 GUI/Desktop enhancement programs available for windows from free to cheap. If... you.... just... look for a minute or two. I mean, that shouldn;t be beyond the capability of a power user should it?

  97. Re:Debian_dos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, pad're the Deb-folks have just recoded DOS_6.22 and are trying to get the batch-files running. See ya next year.

  98. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's entirely right.

  99. Up-to-date KDE 3.02+ for Red hat 7.2/7.3 by Nailer · · Score: 2

    If you don't want to ride the cutting edge on your work desktop, I'd suggest those of you running Red Hat should install apt and add the following to your sources.list:

    rpm http://www.math.unl.edu/linux/redhat/apt 7.2/i386 kde3

    This guy has packaged KDE 3.02 for Red Hat 7.3, but more to the point, also a bunch of useful apps from apps.kde.com, including KRFB (the desktop sharing app) and, IIRC, the samba / nfs right-click file sharing Konqueror plugins.

    1. Re:Up-to-date KDE 3.02+ for Red hat 7.2/7.3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      debian wannabe

  100. Copying Microsoft again by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

    This seems to be another case of copying Microsoft again. They've bundled a remote desktop viewer tool, and now KDE has it. Why can't people integrate some of the cooler stuff before MS? Yes, you could do some of this before, with much setup, but it's going to be point-and-click, and MS beats people to 'point-and-click' implementations usually.

    Here's something I've seen people BEGGING for in Konqueror and Mozilla - file upload progress bars in the browser. How much do we want to bet that MS will put that in IE7, THEN konqueror or mozilla will implement it poorly 6 months later?

    1. Re:Copying Microsoft again by tjansen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hmm... i started krfb before I knew the Remote Assistance feature in WinXP. But when I saw it I got a number of ideas from RA, no doubt.
      The question is: dont you want a feature anymore just because MS implemented it first?

      One of the reasons why MS gets the cool stuff first is because KDE still needs to catch up. Many people claim that Linux/KDE is already competitive, but that isnt true. There are many things that Windows has and Linux/KDE doesnt, so be prepared to see even more copied features before KDE gets the big features that Window lacks.

    2. Re:Copying Microsoft again by fferreres · · Score: 2

      How can you call this copying Microsoft when it has been available years before they included the "feature". I mean PCAnyware and the likes...

      Come on, they implement things as they see fit, when they like it and of course, everyone can contribute.

      You've see some people begging for file upload progress bars in the browser? So? I've seen hundreds if not thouthands of people begging for different stuff. The thing is doing them, and doing only the ones than make sense.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    3. Re:Copying Microsoft again by spitzak · · Score: 2

      I think the point is that they copied the GUI from MicroSoft. Of course you could do this years before MicroSoft thought of it by using VNC and typing the right cryptic thing on the command line on both machines, but nobody thought to make this user-friendly until they saw MicroSoft do it. That is what the original poster was saying.

    4. Re:Copying Microsoft again by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

      *I* do, but I think many people don't - BECAUSE it's MS. I agree, it's not competitive with MS or Apple yet. Nice? Yes. Closer than a year ago? Sure. But no cigar yet.

    5. Re:Copying Microsoft again by rseuhs · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How come that everytime Microsoft copies a something it's OK, but if KDE copies something it's evil?

      What about tabbed browsing?
      What about multiple desktops?
      What about opening new browser windows with the MMB?
      What about themes!
      What about scrollbar-jumping?
      What about the Alt-modifier key for faster window-manipulation?

      MSFT copied often enough and is now clearly lagging behind KDE in the GUI area because they still have a lot to copy to catch up.

    6. Re:Copying Microsoft again by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 2

      Dunno what the scrollbar thing is.

      Themes suck - they impact consistency.

      Tabbed browsing is good.

      Multiple desktops mean less to me than consistent cut/copy/paste between apps. Having highlighted text auto-copied to the clipboard (overwriting what I had put there myself intentionally) SUCKS.

    7. Re:Copying Microsoft again by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Dunno what the scrollbar thing is.

      If you would have KDE installed you could click with the middle mousebutton on a scrollbar and you would know.

      Having highlighted text auto-copied to the clipboard (overwriting what I had put there myself intentionally) SUCKS.

      It sucks even more listening to complete morons bitching about features they don't have to use.

      If you use your sacred Wintendo Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V you will never know that there is another clipboard.

      If you don't like Themes, don't use them, goddamnit.

    8. Re:Copying Microsoft again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you would have KDE installed you could click with the middle mousebutton on a scrollbar and you would know.

      Seems pretty pointless, at least with the mice we've got here, because I normally can't scroll that far with a wheel. If I have to press a button anyway, I may as well right click on the scroll bar and move it as far as I need to.

      It sucks even more listening to complete morons bitching about features they don't have to use.

      If you use your sacred Wintendo Ctrl-C/Ctrl-V you will never know that there is another clipboard.


      You know what? KDE is inconsistent. I just highlighted the text of your post - KDE3/Konqueror - and per the 'EDIT' menu in Konqueror, it says I can use CTRL+C to Copy. So I did. It then said I could use CTRL+V to paste. Yes, it lets me paste, but NOT what I just copied 4 seconds ago via CTRL+C.

      I don't particularly care what the commands to copy/paste are, but KEEP THEM FSCKING CONSISTENT. Perhaps in the EDIT menu they should put 'PASTE (SOMETHING) CTRL+V' which would at least let someone know that it might not paste what any sane person would expect.

      If you don't like Themes, don't use them, goddamnit.

      I don't, but many people seem to get horny as hell over them. The point of Linux for most people seems to be how many 'kewl' themes they can use, instead of how much work they can get done. The few minutes a day you'd save with the benefits of a stable OS (Lunix) vs rebooting every dayare lost for most people who spend way too much time tweaking their displays every few days to get alpha blending drop shadowed menus.

  101. This latest release is BEAUTIFUL. by Martin+Marvinski · · Score: 1

    Oh my god! It's an OS X like GUI that runs on Linux. The desktop issue that Linux always had has been solved! Right On, we knew it was bound to happen, but the desktop is finally better than Mac and Windows.

    Here's the screenshots link that someone posted already in this thread.
    http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/users/tom/kde31alpha/

  102. Looks like OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got a MAC with OS X and I think it rules. Now KDE is moving in that direction. I love it!

    1. Re:Looks like OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like OS X meets Windows XP.
      CPR

  103. no offence by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 0, Troll
    I used KDE as my desktop before 1.0, up through 2.something. I switched to E when I got fed up with KDE's bugginess, and general lack of asthetic appeal. Then I switched to Gnome a while before 1.4, then when 1.4 came out I stuck with Gnome because of it's nice asthetic qualities, simplicity, and general stability, with only occasional annoyances, while KDE at the time had a few relatively severe crash bugs, and was still generally ugly looking. However, I like to stay up to date on things, and KDE, while 3.0 was pretty damn buggy, is a good desktop and I always download the latest major versions to check it out.

    I never found the windowlist thing before, dunno why. Seems to work just fine though, so I at least got my answer ;)

    Anyway, when 3.1 is released, or at least in beta, I'll give it a try again. FWIW, I do have KDE 3.0.x installed on my work machine, along with Gnome 2.0(which I find to be somewhat problematic, but has potential). I like to use my office machine to test stuff out on, no sense wasting my time at home ;)

    KDE is looking better and better, so the reasons I stopped using it are getting fixed (at least IMO). However, one thing I dislike about KDE is that it's built on the QT widget set, which I have no interest in using at it's GPL, instead of LGPL like GTK. I want the freedom to be able to develop commercial software for my desktop of choice, but to be honest I have more interest in developing free(beer and open) software...

    I'm rambling, I'll stop. FWIW, I wasn't complaining, just griping... or something.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  104. Plan acccomplished! by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 2

    Linux IS 2/3 superior to windows according to your criteria or rather KDE is.

    All hints apply to KDE-3.0.2, KDE-3.1a1 is still a little too flaky (usable, but annoying at times).

    To get number 1:
    Kcontrol->LooknFeel->Window Settings
    Set "Inactive inner Window": Left mouse button to "Activate and pass click". (Default is "Activate, Raise and pass click".)

    OK I have no idea about number 2

    To get number 3:
    Alt+Leftclick on the window moves it in kwin without raising it.

    --
    Moritz
    1. Re:Plan acccomplished! by spitzak · · Score: 2
      Yes it is true that most X window managers have a way to turn off click-to-raise, which certainly is better than Windows. I have my KDE configured this way. It would still help if this was the default, however, so applications could assumme it!

      Number 2 is the real killer for me however. It makes it impossible to have a modal window that stays on top and still allow an application to have overlapping main windows. Every single modern X window manager, and Windows, and OS/X, have this annoying behavior. I think this could easily be fixed but the designers are sheep and are scared to death of being different.

      On my KDE alt+left does nothing, however I did notice that the right mouse button pops up a menu that has "move" on it and that moves the window without raising it. Still not as nice as old fvwm behavior, in my opinion.

  105. Re:Kde developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Actually, nazism is socialist. It's interesting that nazism should be brought up on this thread since nazi is an acronym for national socialist (don't know german).

    Facism is socialist, too. Mussolini was the disciple of a big-time Italian socialist journalist and never disavowed socialism. He and Hitler thought that socialism and communism were too globalistic, though. That is essentially the difference between s&c are universalistic whereas n&f are regionalistic or racialist.

  106. Ever heard of KPackage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't need to be a genius to upgrade KDE. I'm relatively new to KDE/Linux and have upgraded KDE twice simply by downloading all the RPMs and then dropping them into KPackage. It tells me what I need to download. The whole system works like a charm.

  107. What if the bad mutties don't die out? by aliens · · Score: 1

    Forgive me if I'm wrong, but it seems unless a total rewrite of a codebase is done the bad seems to simply stick around. Adding to the bloat.

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  108. Please, Josh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're sure about this, why not enter KDE's mailing list and drop a note? I don't have such knowledge or I'd do myself.

    Or, if you're not in the mood, why not scribbling some notes in a comment right here?

    I'm concerned about comments on KDE people overwhelmed with mail, but KDE is their child... I bet they are not cutting corners on it.

    You say where things could go faster and someone who knows them could forward the comment to them.

    All of sudden, KDE would start to run lighter and you started the ball running... What do you think?

  109. Re: WinME keeps looking better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't WinME a newer version of that Win9x crashosaurus?

  110. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy's got 2 for one word?

    Please mod the parent +5, insightful!

    PS: Yeah, I know, somebody already explained that's just the way th e points system works for guys with great kharma, but still...

  111. My via crucis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First select news story.
    Then change threshold to 0 (-1 sucks) and nested.
    Then find "coward".
    Then keep reading and pressing find next.

    The best is hidden.

  112. Excellent idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you could jot down some warning message just to be more user-friendly...

    "Hey, I get the feeling that you are not willing to use me. Do you want me to turn off and not start-up next time you use KDE?
    You can always reactivate me by choosing K/Settings..."

    Funny, eh?

  113. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KDE is cool!

    Hanzosan: But what if it had icon animations?

    X can be better used to render even faster...

    Hanzosan: Imagine it with icon animations.

    What else could we put to make more gorgeous?

    Hanzosan: We could do icon animations.

    What about some hot sex tonight, Hanzochan?

    Hanzosan: I'd love, honey, but could we do it with icon animations?

  114. All this yield a better experience: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what if we add some icon animations to it?

    A CD might add some spin to your desktop.

    And if you're onto burning CDs, why not a diminute John Silver with a tiny little parrot in his shoulder?

    That would sure make the headlines!

  115. Misnamed :( by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    Here, I had my hopes up that something like CoolEdit had come to Linux. There are no professional wave editors for Linux.

    KRipAudio would've been a nicer name.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Misnamed :( by elliott666 · · Score: 1

      what about kwave? I'm not too familiar with what cooledit is like these days but kwave has most of the features I used to use in cooledit 95.

      here's what they say...

      • KDE2/3 conform GUI
      • 24 Bit Support
      • Undo/Redo
      • Simple Drag & Drop
      • Support for multi-track files
      • Complete zoom and scroll-capability
      • Playback via KDE's aRts or OSS (deprecated)
      • Load and edit-capability for large files (can use virtual memory)
      • Reading and auto-repair of damaged wav-files
      • Supports multiple windows
      • Import of all file types supported by libaudiofile
      • Extendable Plugin interface
  116. KDE on Solaris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have installed the package on my Solaris machine, but I have no idea how to hook it up so that it shows up in my list of possible desktop environments upon login. Are there any instructions for this on the web anywhere?

  117. Re:Kde developers by 10Ghz · · Score: 2

    Didn't that start from a post by a KDE-developer where he complained Israels policy regarding palestinians? So disagreeing with Israel = Nazi?

    And weren't there some anti-black comments found in Debian? They were put there by one of the devels. Does that mean that Debian is racist?

    And what about socialism? It's just a political/economic system, just like capitalism is. It's not evil, just like capitalism is not evil.

    Last time I checked, we still have freedom of speech

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  118. rpm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I just wait for the rpms to come out for my distro, then I download them all and type:

    as root

    urpmi *

    and away it goes, even asks you for your cd's if it needs a file or library.

  119. rpms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dont know which rpm to install first? easy, put them all in the same directory, then type (as root)

    urpmi *

    it will install them in the correct order, and even ask you for a cd if its missing libraries etc.

  120. Re:Ive been using KDE 3.1 Alpha for some time now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    QT-ugly-fucker...i'd rather use GNU rather than trollcrap products dicksucker.

  121. Amy Grant by Tottori · · Score: 1
    Ba ha ha ha! Aside from that, it looks cool.

    Just one thing: does it support no-click ripping? The one reason I kludged together my own script is that all the other programs I tried required me to dig up the window and click something just to say I actually wanted to rip the CD I just put in. When you're doing 10 in a row, that's really annoying.

    --
    use constant PERL_IS_BROKEN => $] >= 5.006;
    1. Re:Amy Grant by IceFox · · Score: 2

      Well I pretty much went to the library and grabbed the first 50 cd's that they had (the limit) and used them as test material. _A_my Grant as you can see would be in that pile.

      But yes that is in fact one of the reasons why I wrote it. I wanted to be able to rip 30 cd's and have them just "encode" overnight. Encoding takes that longest time always. Thus I made a job control system where it will create jobs of ripping and encoding automaticly. So other then setting up the cd info you just have to click rip.

      -Benjamin Meyer

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  122. You haven't been following the process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can poke around on kde.org to verify what I'm saying. Many features such as SVG icons, tabbed browsing, most of the games, etc. were planned for 3.0 but the developers of these apps didn't have them ready in time for the freeze. They were then told to ready their code for the 3.1 release.

  123. You might also try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really like having to go all the way up to the top for a task list. Instead, I use the KDE default to middle click on the desktop to pop up the task menu.

  124. For moi by NaveWeiss · · Score: 1

    Hello Big Dogs Cock

    Since you managed to achieve a karma capped account and you're looking for creative ways to burn karma, I'd appreciate if you post a link to this thing in various stories, in order to increase the attention of the slashdot chicks.

    Thank you very much.

    --
    Slashdot community, please notice: I am looking for a girlfriend.
    Nave H. Weiss
  125. thanks by jabbadeznuts · · Score: 1

    Thank you very much. Being sort of a n00b, all of these little tips are great help! Thank you!