Slashdot Mirror


Rat Mind Control

Patrick Key writes "Well, not exactly mind control but scientists have taken rat training to a new level. By inserting electrodes into the brain of a rat, they're able to effectively control a rat to move forward, left and right. They used the brain area that processes whisker info for left/right control and the pleasure center for moving forward. All sorts of interesting implications- no mention of when a human version would be available. The feat is mentioned in an IEEE's Spectrum article here"

180 comments

  1. The applications in Congress are innumerable by corebreech · · Score: 0, Troll

    It certainly has to work better than the cheese did.

    1. Re:The applications in Congress are innumerable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, right, congresspeople don't bear any resemblence to rats at all.

      Gosh, what was I thinking! That you're all whores?

  2. IEEE? by kevinmarsh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When can we see the protocol spec sheet for controlling humans?

    1. Re:IEEE? by pigeon768 · · Score: 0, Troll

      We already have it.

  3. I wonder how long it will be... by danny256 · · Score: 3, Funny

    before someone hacks the rat and get linux running on it.

    1. Re:I wonder how long it will be... by Subcarrier · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder how long it will be before someone hacks the rat and get linux running on it.

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these -- lurking in the subway tunnels.

      --
      "I have opinions of my own, strong opinions, but I don't always agree with them." -- George H. W. Bush
    2. Re:I wonder how long it will be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean a BeoRat cluster ? ;-)

    3. Re:I wonder how long it will be... by $rtbl_this · · Score: 1

      Hey how hard can it be? You'd just need to hack gpm to support rats instead of just mice.

      --
      "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
    4. Re:I wonder how long it will be... by labyrinth · · Score: 1

      Actually, rats have been known to do some clustering..... in Dutch we call such a cluster a 'rattekoning' (rat king), don't know the English name

    5. Re:I wonder how long it will be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hate to see the rat core dump.

    6. Re:I wonder how long it will be... by Turing+Machine · · Score: 2

      Also "rat king" in English. One of these is a major feature in the very disturbing SF story "The Psychologist Who Wouldn't Do Awful Things to Rats" by James Tiptree, Jr.

    7. Re:I wonder how long it will be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows probably already supports it via PnP. You know how Linux driver support is.

    8. Re:I wonder how long it will be... by OnyxSphinx · · Score: 1
      But wouldn't hacking a rat be a violation of the DMCA?

      ...oh wait. Who'd sue?

      --
      -- The silencing of the many will be golden to the few.
  4. repost by xercist · · Score: 4, Informative

    Can't the editors do a simple SEARCH?
    It's been posted here before. Took me 10 seconds to find it.

    --

    --
    grep "xercist" /dev/random ...you'll find me in there someday
    1. Re:repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Hehe... what I find funny is that it was the *same* editor! :)

    2. Re:repost by sinserve · · Score: 2, Funny

      Timothy would never have done such a thing, Taco must have plugged him with electrodes
      while he was asleep. /me thinks poor Timmy is now fetching taco's paper.

    3. Re:repost by packeteer · · Score: 1

      poor timmy??? the way the scientists did this experiment the rats are enjoying what they do... they are not forced to do anything but it feels better than doing anything else... if taco did this to timmy then he would be doing it because he WANTS to...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    4. Re:repost by littleRedFriend · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe it is time to include some text clustering algorithms into the /. engine.

      The medline database, for example, contains millions of abstracts from scientific articles that have been clustered using this relatively simple method. It works very well. In this way editors would be able to find related posts. The 3 most similar posts could be interesting for us readers as well.

      --
      IANAL, but imagine a beowulf cluster of in Soviet Russia all your belong are base to us welcoming the new SCO overlords.
    5. Re:repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, here's the five highest modded Funny comments from the _last_ time this was posted, just so we know how lame slashdot really is.

      Subj: remote controller rats

      Do they use 9.6 volt batteries? Those battery packs tend to run out so fast, I'd hate to have to recharge my rats after only a half hour of use. That simply wouldn't be acceptable.

      Subj: First step rats, the next step Congressman!
      The title says it all.

      Makes for a great alibi, though. Combine it with a bone-conductive radio impland and it gives new credence to the old "voices told me to do it" excuse.

      Subj: erm.. rat cyborg

      does it star in the new terminator 3 movie coming out??

      Subj: Okay I get it...

      but did they really have to use rats? I mean, it's a great idea and all, but the last thing I want if I'm stranded somewhere is rats all over me. Am I alone in this?

      Just my $.02

      Subj: Re:First rats, then people

      I don't know about you, but I think I would notice that portions of my skull were missing when my hairbrush perforated my brain.

    6. Re:repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because time and time again, Timothy proves that he's not only the dumbest slashdot editor, but one of the stupidest people alive. Whomever in HR at VA Software is the person that hired him, should be fired, that's for sure.

    7. Re:repost by foom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      no they *can't* do a simple search, because the "search engine" DOESN'T INDEX 3-LETTER WORDS. Go ahead, search for "rat", you won't find anything. Try searching for "rat mind", wow look at all those irrelevant articles because it conveniently ignored the "rat" part of the search. I really don't understand how the slashdot search engine can possibly pretend to be useful when it doesn't index 3-letter words. Half the interesting search terms "for nerds" are acronyms of 3 letters or less, not to mention the actual real words like rat.

    8. Re:repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you search for ratS...
      eh that was hard...

    9. Re:repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can't the editors do a simple SEARCH?

      It is becuase the moderators are dumb.... thats why they mod me down as Troll!

    10. Re:repost by orangesquid · · Score: 2

      Is it just me, or are other people thinking of LOGO, too? Now all we need are PEN UP and PEN DOWN commands. Or maybe BLADDER TRICKLE and BLADDER SHUTOFF will suffice ;)

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    11. Re:repost by Quixote · · Score: 2

      It would be interesting to do an analysis and see who at /. reposts most often. My money is on CmdrTaco.

    12. Re:repost by Dalroth · · Score: 1

      My money is on Michael.

    13. Re:repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My money is on my dresser, waiting for the hooker to pick it up on her way out.

    14. Re:repost by flonker · · Score: 2

      That's what the "pleasure" electrode is for...

    15. Re:repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, Now instead of fear of someone writing a trojan for our computers we have fear of someone writing a trojan for us. (Small box with antena send signal WETT_SELF to everyone in a 10 block radius)

    16. Re:repost by _LFTL_ · · Score: 1

      Can't the editors do a simple SEARCH?

      I've that about writing a simple script to search out article as they pass into the 3 month old range and then resubmit them automatically to save teh editors some time.

    17. Re:repost by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but unfortunately you can't search for IBMs or SUNs or LRPs or TUXs or FBIs or USBs or RedHat 7.3 or QT or XML or PHP or PDA or GTK or SQL or IRC or GNU or ICQ or AOL or RFS or API or X11 or anything else for that matter. I know someone's going to reply with something about Google...

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    18. Re:repost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ho ho!

    19. Re:repost by Arjuna · · Score: 1

      Yeah a blanket 'no 3 letter words indexed' policy is pretty dumb. Just drop the obvious ones like 'the', 'and', 'etc'. Even some 2 letter words should be indexed, like G4, RH, MS.

    20. Re:repost by svzurich · · Score: 1

      Try placing an * after the three letter words. Example: rat* While not a perfect solution (and no, this doesn't work on /.), it is well worth trying on other sites.

  5. Speaking of which [OT] by kawaichan · · Score: 2

    The article also mentioned about they got a monkey to move a cursor

    Now, would it not be awsome for that cursor to be hooked up with that mouse and let the monkey to control that cursor to control that mouse (hehe)

    --

    kawai
    1. Re:Speaking of which [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be cool if they get it small/advanced enough to be controlled from a remote. You could also just swap out one of it's eyes with one from a borg.

    2. Re:Speaking of which [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is funny, and shouldn't be moded down. Those who did it, either are a Slasdhot police, or people with no sense of humor.

    3. Re:Speaking of which [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! They got monkey to move a cursor! When will they get AOL users to move the cursor?

  6. DUPE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i saw this a couple months ago on /.

  7. old post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm positive this is an old post.... Within the past 30 days, I'm sure. Dam, can't remember from when, and this search engine on slashdot is worse than Microsofts..

  8. Ninja Turtles by chicoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pretty soon the army will be able to make ninja turtles that live in the sewers, and eat pizza.

    Or imagine a real life donkey kong game?

    rspc who?

    aaaaaaahh...
    ... but, ...but who else will protect us from the evil Shredder?

    --
    ~the keyboard is mightier than the pen.
    1. Re:Ninja Turtles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you stoned or always this retarded?

  9. Interesting... by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're doing some interesting work with deep brain stimulation. It's already been used for a while to deal with Parkinsons patients.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:Interesting... by madenosine · · Score: 1

      yeah, but that was nowhere near as complex; they just sent a constant jolt at one place on the head and the patient had to be next to a power source

    2. Re:Interesting... by langed · · Score: 1
      Well... It's been experimented on rats before, that if you give a mouse a button to push to stimulate its pleasure center in its brain, it'll literally kill itself by pushing that button until it drives itself to exhaustion, and it'll lose interest in everything else (food, water, etc.) It's been speculated that the same would happen to human beings.

      After reading that article (which sounds quite similar in nature to the opening of the book "The Terminal Man" by Michael Chrichton), I think it might be plausible to say that the same thing could be implemented in humans, but...

      The problem with controlling a human the same way is that a human, with the power of reasoning, will eventually come to the conclusion that there is something going on here--something or someone with an agenda trying to control it. And a human would likely then end up resisting--unless there were a pain center with an electrode implanted in it as well, for correction.

      Herein lies a Catch-22. Given a particularly strong-willed person with both pleasure and pain electrodes, after a while the person, beginning to resist, will quit being subjected to pleasurable stimulation and instead be frequently punished. This will tear away at the psyche of the subject in such a fashion as to eventually drive him/her to schizophrenia, insanity, or suicide.

      Of course, all this is quite barbaric and all. But this is what the psychiatric community tends to teach...

      Nevertheless, it would be great to have an electrode stuck into a pleasure center in my brain, with an easily-accessible pushbutton--surely I could handle it, right?

    3. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think heroin, has already proven what you are talking about, how ever it has an added psychical addiction but that can be fixed through other drugs.

  10. The answer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Men will never learn to understand woman because we will no longer have to.

  11. Please post MORE OLD news by azav · · Score: 0, Redundant

    God, don't people who post read this site?

    This is what, one, two months old??

    Who validates these duplicate posts??

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  12. REPOST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, come on. This is not only a repost, but was already played out in the popular press...

    My favorite was the christian radio host who objected to the research, not because of what it says about mind control, or the sanctity of life, but because wire reports mentioned a quote where a scientist described the rat's brain as having been a product of millions of years of (shudder) *evolution*...

  13. Pentagon insists real rats not being used by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 5, Funny

    SatireWire did a take-off of this three months ago, back when it was topical.

  14. Only forwards, backwards, left and right? by PlazMatiC · · Score: 5, Funny

    All the other kids have mouse look now!

    1. Re:Only forwards, backwards, left and right? by OnyxSphinx · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anyone's thinking of doing a rat-in-a-maze MUD now?

      --
      -- The silencing of the many will be golden to the few.
  15. does anyone else imagine by nzhavok · · Score: 4, Funny

    does anyone else imagine mad scientists racing radio contolled rats around a maze? no? just me?

    --

    He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    1. Re:does anyone else imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking more like "Battle bots: the next generation"

    2. Re:does anyone else imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      does anyone else imagine mad scientists racing radio contolled rats around a maze? no? just me?

      "Here, Stanley, give this rat a try - it corners like a dream!"

    3. Re:does anyone else imagine by Burpmaster · · Score: 1
      does anyone else imagine mad scientists racing radio contolled rats around a maze?
      I thought you were about to say mad scientists raising an unstoppable army of remote-controlled rats, and plotting world domination.
  16. Blah blah what NEWS! Hippies, get a clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look here..
    MC Patents

  17. Set the Wayback machine for May 2002 by cdf12345 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    What month did it happen?

    Live rats are fitted with electrodes so they could be steered toward hidden bombs or disaster victims.

    Was it:

    January 2002
    November 2001
    May 2002
    April 1999
    August 2002

    The correct answer is: May 2002, lets start checking dates and dupes!

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
  18. So, what's the API... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for /dev/rat?

    echo forward > /dev/rat

    or something like that?

  19. Creepy by Soporific · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How long before we are hooked up to pleasure stimulating electrodes that make superior workers? Other than the computers we are working on right now?

    ~S

    1. Re:Creepy by Kirby-meister · · Score: 2

      I don't know about your computer, but mine just won't stop running RtCW multiplayer. Quite unproductive, I must say.

    2. Re:Creepy by Renraku · · Score: 2

      Aren't we already hooked up to pleasure-stimulating devices? Such as..well..sex organs?

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    3. Re:Creepy by garcia · · Score: 1

      it's called money.

    4. Re:Creepy by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      How long before we are hooked up to pleasure stimulating electrodes that make superior workers?

      I hope it's soon. It would replace the current inefficient and error-prone cycle of:
      work->money->shiny objects->attract woman->pleasure

      with the more elegant and foolproof:
      work->pleasure

      This could be a huge timesaver.

    5. Re:Creepy by archen · · Score: 1

      The catch is that you'd probably get arrested for trying to steer a person with them.

    6. Re:Creepy by ross.w · · Score: 2

      I'm going to make a fortune selling tin foil hats.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    7. Re:Creepy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Half the female population would be in prison if this were the case.

  20. Attention Slashdot Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    \Ed"i*tor\, n. [L., that which produces, from edere to publish: cf. F. ['e]diteur.] One who edits; esp., a person who prepares, superintends, revises, and corrects a book, magazine, or newspaper, etc., for publication.
    Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

  21. Google "find other stories like this"? by hoggy · · Score: 2

    Perhaps Slashdot needs a thingy to extract the keywords out of a story and then search for previous stories containing those keywords and displaying them in a pre-submission "please confirm this story isn't a repost of one of the following".

    Pulling the keywords "remote control rats whisker brain control" out of the story I found the previous submission (in May, also by timothy) as the top hit. Whilst I'm a huge fan of blaming the editors, I'm sure their job would be easier if the re-submissions were being weeded out in advance.

  22. Would you like it ? by The_Lightman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Now, just a simple question to you all. What would you say if someone would be putting electrodes in YOUR brains (provided you have one, obviously) ? Animal vivisection should be prohibited, always. If you want to experiment with brains and such, why don't you use rapists or other death row prisoners ? Animals are living beings, as such they have rights. You all should start thinking about this.

    1. Re:Would you like it ? by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      That's right, we should release them all back into the wild, where they can run free and live long happy lives...

      What? The exterminator's number? Oh here. Yeah, rat infestations can be nasty, watch out for those mites...

      Back to the lab rats, where was I?

    2. Re:Would you like it ? by The_Lightman · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hey moron, read again my post (if you are able to, obviously), I said "animals", what would you say should they use your nice dog to experiment with ? Put your head out of your ass and start thinking...

    3. Re:Would you like it ? by The_Lightman · · Score: 1

      On a side note.... "troll" ?!?!
      Ok, so I guess you consider wwf, aavs, greenpeace and such, trollers ?
      Alright, now I start to understand what kind of people usually read /. ... good ...

    4. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when did rapists and death row prisoners stop having rights?

    5. Re:Would you like it ? by The_Lightman · · Score: 1

      Well, they have, but no more than other animals. In fact, they have way less, imho.

      (btw, why don't you post under your nick, instead of anonymous coward ? (unless this *is* your nick/name))

    6. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you consider stubborn bigots who breed culpability in the masses through disinformation to be trolls, I guess Greenpeace and the like qualify. As do zealots of any faith.
      And no, this isn't trolling, this is a flame.

    7. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Animals can neither have duties nor be held responsible and therefore cannot have rights. When they are able to be deserving members of society, they will have rights.

    8. Re:Would you like it ? by The_Lightman · · Score: 1

      So the WWF is composed only of stubborn bigots, right ?

      Well, in this case, I'm happy to see there are so many stubborn bigots...


      (On a side note, I don't particularly like Greenpeace methods, too. I consider them stupid morons. I just named them because a lot of ppl knows them, much more than the AAVS)

    9. Re:Would you like it ? by The_Lightman · · Score: 1
      You know, you're a moron. And you don't know laws, either.

      Animals *do* have rights, should you be able to read, here's a link for you to check out :

      http://worldanimal.net/legislinks.html


      Before speaking, you should check your knowledge on the matter ...
    10. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I don't want to get flamed by a bunch of animal rights zealots in the future. Animals do have rights. On my plate.

    11. Re:Would you like it ? by The_Lightman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A man who doesn't have the courage to express his ideas doesn't deserve to be called a man....
      Oh, and, btw, I won't answer any other "anonymous coward" post, if you want to express your ideas, do it as a man.

    12. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apart from it mainly being lobbying material - bogus international charters and the like- and not actual law, the whole "animal rights" thing is an insult to the spirit of democracy. Restrictions can be applied through law to *citizen's* rights upon animals. That doesn't grant any rights to animals, which are righfully considered as things in most places, except in some decadent countries like Germany. Though, you may consider that bacteriae should have rights as they aren't technically things. Use of antibiotics qualifying as a crime would be funny indeed...

    13. Re:Would you like it ? by bellings · · Score: 1

      Oh, and, btw, I won't answer any other "anonymous coward" post, if you want to express your ideas, do it as a man.

      Please post your name, address, and telephone number. Would you prefer to hold this discussion through post, phone, or face to face?

      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    14. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This type of animal experimentation is disgusting and should be stopped.

    15. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Animals kill animals too. I think we should experiment on the animals who kill animals. They should be considered death row inmates really.

    16. Re:Would you like it ? by The_Lightman · · Score: 1

      So, animals don't have rights. good. so you don't have, either, being you an animal. Or maybe you think you're a vegetable ?!?!?

    17. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cars also kill animals. I say we hold the auto manufacturers responsible for all the ills of the world! As for vivisection, I'd say use corporate executives and lawyers, assuming that there aren't any lawyers/executives rights groups that object...

    18. Re:Would you like it ? by cortices · · Score: 2

      Oh please. First and foremost, if it helps mankind in any way, then I submit that the testing is necessary.

      You would rather have the testing done on humans? This is quite ridiculous, even if said humans are rapists or murderers. It is cruel and unusual for the human because he/she is self-aware and understands what is happening. He/she can appreciate the fact that they are being tortured. Rats cannot. Animal testing is a necessary stage before any science can be applied to humans and as long as humane policies are in place for the testing and disposal of the animals, I have no problems with it.

      Whether you like it or not, animal testing has probably extended your life by about fifty or sixty years.

      --
      You can't kill the boogey man.
    19. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what would you say should they use your nice dog to experiment with ?

      I'd sue them of course. They can go buy their own damn dog.

    20. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know but atheist seem to be quite stupid, if you want to be an animal you are free to be an animal, I am a human, something very diffrent from animals, even if we are all carbon creatures, have eyes and brains. The probably best reason for eyes are to see, and brain are to process data and control. But that does not mean that animals are humans, or humans are animals.

      And yeah, if humans were animals, they would be pigs and mokeys.

    21. Re:Would you like it ? by Iumma · · Score: 1

      It is cruel and unusual for the human because he/she is self-aware and understands what is happening. He/she can appreciate the fact that they are being tortured. Rats cannot.

      Give me more evidence before you say rats are not self-aware! Sure they don't talk with us, but to conclude rats are not self-aware is illogical.
      Remember all animals react to pain, and yes 'animals' includes humans.
      Scientific American published an article (complete with pictures) about the sucessful creation of headless mice. Certainly you could justify their actions in terms of "the quest for knowledge" but at some point morality must weigh in. I suspect that the boundries placed on this kind of research cannot come from the desensitized scientists alone.

      (i think the article appeared in SciAm Sept 95)

    22. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know if you decapitate a chicken and proceed to feed it, it can live for months or even years?

    23. Re:Would you like it ? by Kobal · · Score: 1

      They don't exactly react to pain. They react to tactile stimuli. Some plants also do, e.g. Mimosa pudica, and we can safely assume they don't feel pain, having no neural system at all. The only way to prove or disprove lesser animals are self-aware is through experimentation. Of course, animal rights zealots would like to make Pascal's bet on that point, except that unlike any hypothetic god, animals can be vivisected. If you've gone that far as making animal self-awareness your god, you're a sad, sorry person...

    24. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The_Lightman,

      Your suggestion is duly noted and rejected. Thanks for posting.

    25. Re:Would you like it ? by CthulhuTequila · · Score: 1

      The basic problem I see with the idea of using murders and rapists would be:

      Who want's a remote controlled rapist? Now... RATS on the other hand... a remote controlled rat would be really... useful? Aw forget it.

      Seriously. It's just a rat. They're just animals. I'm all for protecting "animal rights" and what-have-you, but if it comes down to a choice of my life versus an animals... the animal is going to die. I'm not sure if a remote controlled rat is going to extend my life or make it better, but other innovations based on this research just might. So maybe it's justifiable after all.

      On the flip side of the coin maybe not. What do I know. I'm only typing what the guy in the white coat holding the controller is making me type anyway.

      Take Care

    26. Re:Would you like it ? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > What would you say if someone would be putting electrodes in YOUR brains (provided you have one, obviously) ?

      If the electrodes stimulated my pleasure center 24/7, by definition, the answer would be yes.

      (And if not before the surgery, then certainly after surgery. "Nope, no regrets at all, man, it's like they make me run these big mazes, but the walls themselves are made of cheese!")

    27. Re:Would you like it ? by Xacid · · Score: 1

      "First and foremost, if it helps mankind in any way, then I submit that the testing is necessary." Helps mankind?! How on Earth can this help us anymore than just creating a robot that can do the same thing? Why is this mind control with the electrodes necessary for human advancement? If anything this can only lead us closer to a world not unlike those in creepy sci-fi novels. If you want creatures to plow through rubble to find people then make a machine for that. Why let technology that could potentially be used to control a large group of people exist? I don't think this can be comparable to the argument about nuclear science either. Yes there was a bomb, but there was also a new energy source that actually could help the human race out. Where's the pro in controlling another being?

    28. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot believe you think animals should be tested on to help mankind.. mankind needs bloody help getting over its self... 50 years ago scientists thought animals didnt have feeling... Im telling you any scientist whos thinkgs that never had a pet. What the *$%@ is the point in controlling a rat why would we want to have this superficial control over any living thing from RAT to HUMAN there are enough problems EVERYWHERE that need to be addressed before we start controlling rats. AND LASTLY A BLOODY RAT IS AWARE OF WHATS HAPPENING TO HIM TOO EVEN IF HE DOESNT HAVE THE ABILITY TO SPEAK UP ABOUT IT!!! DISPOSAL!?! I wonder if the rat deserves to live more than you!

    29. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually a more likely use is to implant it in paralasis victums to allow them to control themselves, And i dont know about you but I probably wouldn't let them implant the receptors in the first place, and if they were in a position to force it then there is something terrably wrong with society that needs to be resisted.

    30. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ---Quote ON---
      Oh please. First and foremost, if it helps mankind in any way, then I submit that the testing is necessary.
      ---Quote OFF---

      So torturing other life forms, even if they are beneath us in order to extend our own life is okay to you? We don't even know 100% what our brains are capable of, who knows, maybe we can "talk to the animals" but science hasn't reached that point yet. We are just beginning to really discover how intelligent some animals are, in the future some discoveries may shock us to the point of halting this type of experimentation, but by then it might be too late.

      ---Quote ON---
      You would rather have the testing done on humans?
      ---Quote OFF---

      No, I'd rather such "testing" (clever word to disguise the torture) not be done at all.

      ---Quote ON---
      It is cruel and unusual for the human because he/she is self-aware and understands what is happening. He/she can appreciate the fact that they are being tortured. Rats cannot.
      ---Quote OFF---

      Really. Schools once taught the earth was flat, beware of what some may teach now only to learn the truth at a much later date. You say rats cannot, but you cannot say that with 100% certainty, unless you are suggesting we will never progress past what we have already learned about rats.

      ---Quote ON---
      Whether you like it or not, animal testing has probably extended your life by about fifty or sixty years.
      ---Quote OFF---

      That's a big "Probably".

      Today torture such as this is accepted on animals to further humanity. Now they're picking at stem cells, and that's just about accepted by all (except a good amount of religious folk), it doesn't take a genius to see what lies next down the read as far as experimentation goes, "probably."

    31. Re:Would you like it ? by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 2

      I was calmly surfing through the fields of animal rights nuts, managing to prevent myself from responding to them, when I cam upon this post. Maybe it was the use of bold. Maybe it was the tone. I don't know. But I have to address it.

      "So torturing other life forms, even if they are beneath us in order to extend our own life is okay to you?"

      Yes. O.k? Yes. I would torture a rat to extend my life a year. So would you. If someone came up to you and said "Kill this rat and your life will be extended", you would accept. Not only that, but these rats were -bred- for this purpose. They are creatures that would probably not survive in the wild (Their bright white coats would give them away to predators in an instant)

      "No, I'd rather such "testing" (clever word to disguise the torture) not be done at all."

      No, "Testing", is a clever word for learning things. It might be unpleasant for the rat, (In fact, it probably -is- unpleasant for the rat) but it isn't like scientists are sitting around killing rats for the hell of it. They are learning things that enhance our lives. (Most of the time)

      "...Schools once taught the earth was flat..."

      Ah, yes, the typical answer for a person without a valid argument. This has seen so much over-use that it is almost an argument against your point. Watch, I can use it too.
      "Schools teach that man is mortal. However, they also once taught that the Earth is flat. Therefore, because they were wrong once, they must always be wrong. Therefore, I'm immortal." Cool eh?

      "...but you cannot say that with 100% certainty..." (That rats cannot appreciate the fact that they are being tortured)

      The amount of things that you can answer with a 100% surety are very limited. (I personally hold that rats -can- appreciate the fact that they are living crappy lives. I just don't care)

      "That's a big "Probably". " (Animal testing having extended his life 50-60 years)

      Animal testing has almost certainly not extended your life quite that long. However, 20-30 years is not an unreasonable figure. Tell me, would you give 30 years of your life for a few hundred white lab-rats that would've been exterminated as pests? How about condemning all of humanity to have 30 year shorter lives?

      At the very end you mention stem cell research. That's where I draw the line. Using humans as fodder to advance humankind is beyond my tolerance.

      Telling it like it is-

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    32. Re:Would you like it ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proper use of this sort of technology could lead to many great uses.

      Terminally ill, immobile, patients could be set into 'pleasure mode' for the remainder of there short lives; which is a hell of a lot more humane then letting them suffer in a bed while doctors argue with politicians about how much pain medication they can recieve.

      People who have become addicted to a controlled substance like cocane, or tobacho (Well ok, tobacho is not a controlled substance, but it should be could (With doctor supervision) use something like this to help kick the habbit.

      It could be used in the controll of arthritus pain, or chronic fatigue syndrome.

      It could be used to help moatavate people (voluntarily) to do things that they find difficult (A littel bit of internal wiring could allow the mobidly obese to enjoy being plessantly hungry rather then fully satiated, but not starving)

      Of course just like the atomic bomb, gunpowder, steel, and painkillers- there will be abuses, some of them have the potential to be extremely ugly- a few that I see possible:

      Slave trade: With the ability to force trigger a pleasure responce it woulden't be terribly difficult to turn a normal human into a willing slave, of course it would probabally involve getting the requisite human at birth so that they don't realise that it's unnatural to feal really good after you bring your master the paper, but in the type of countries that would be unable to shut down the type of shop required to make these implants that shoulden't be a problem.

      Sex trade: Same basic scenario as above, but if all the person has to do is lie there and enjoy themselves- why bother turning the thing off, and if there so intoxicated with pleasure that they can barely move- you can get any given person and do that to them.

      As for actual CONTROL of a currently sane and aware being- I dbought it. They would KNOW something is wrong, and they would seek to rectify it, most likely becomming violent twoards whatever is causing there strange generation of pleasure, and any people who seem connected to that.

  23. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other news, Slashdot editor timothy was taken to small claims court for allegedly owing several hundred dollars to the local Blockbuster. The movie has been overdue for approximately four months.

    Apparently, sources close to timothy said that he'd fallen into a weird spell where he left work every day with a glazed look in his eye muttering, "Well, time to go home and finally finish Groundhog Day..."

  24. same story again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's this monkeybusiness? Why post same stories over and over again? It can get quite boring.

    1. Re:same story again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SlashSnot is slinging their usual Snotrag storys...

  25. Lets see if anyone notices... by rosewood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article: "It's one thing to see a rat running around like this, people don't get too emotional about that, but as soon as you get into dogs or work animals, people start getting real excited," he said.

    I can see it now. Farmers having livestock (cows, horses, etc.) implanted with these devices so all they have to do is throw a switch and they
    are automatically commanded to come back to the barn for feeding / milking / slaughter / whatever. Add a GPS receiver, a livestock_id for each animal, and some software.

    Or, use this to make sure that Man's Best Friend stays within the yard or comes back to you when out for a run at the park How about adding a small microphone and a clock so Spot is commanded to Not Bark At Night so you (and the neighbors!) can get some sleep?

    I'm certain there are some people who would think these are Great Ideas ®

    The immediate downside I see is there is no feedback loop. What if the AUC (Animal Under Control) breaks a leg, gets a deep cut, is threatened by a predator, or is otherwise incapacitated? The controller (human or automated) is unaware of this and keeps sending commands to "GO THIS WAY!!!" Shudder. I sure hope society works out the ethical considerations well before they overcome the technical limitations! Just because we can doesn't mean we should!

    Sure, the expense is prohibitive, now. But there are some people for whom the expense is no object. The price of computers and other electronics have plummeted over the years. Power consumption requirements have dropped dramatically, too. I can well imagine that in 10 or so years, it would be possible to do this cheaply and easily.

    So, if some day I wake up in a bathtub full of ice with a note beside me... instead of it saying my kidneys have been removed it'll say a remote control has been implanted in my brain. Let the urban legends begin! =)

    'd

    1. Re:Lets see if anyone notices... by MiTEG · · Score: 2
      --
      The future isn't what it used to be.
    2. Re:Lets see if anyone notices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you win a cookie!

      im glad someone did

  26. Excercise the cat? by Viking+of+the+north · · Score: 2, Funny


    Now I can't wait to get one of these rats. Then I can just sit in my sofa with my brand new remotecontroller and play with my cat.

    No more ping-pong balls for me and my cat

    --

    All work and no play makes me a dull boy
  27. Imagine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a Beowulf cluster of these!

    1. Re:Imagine.. by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

      Wasn't Beowulf just a giant rat anyway?

    2. Re:Imagine.. by $rtbl_this · · Score: 1

      No, Beowulf was a human warrior. You're thinking of Grendel, who was slain by Beowulf by having his arm torn off. But he wasn't a giant rat either. So maybe you weren't thinking of him either. Come to think of it, there was a distinct shortage of giant rats in the Beowulf saga.

      I think I need a lie down.

      --
      "Are you being weird, or sarcastic?" said Emma. I said I didn't know because I get the two feelings mixed up.
  28. Finally by Isle · · Score: 1

    .. we have found a way to get decent politicians.

    Rat Mind Control

  29. you rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this fucking world is full of fucking RATS

    hey, are you interested in cool warez and cracks for linux then please come and visit us on efnet.

    server: irc.efnet.org
    port: 6667
    channel: #linuxwarez

    please message SC0RN for cool new leet warez.

  30. forward, left, and right? by Erpo · · Score: 1

    What about strafing?

    1. Re:forward, left, and right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can put some electrodes directly into the back legs, synchronize them with the front and bingo you have a straffing rat. Attach one of those lil medical laser pens and you could have some kick ass Rat Dome wars.

  31. Makes me picture pinky and the brain. by t0qer · · Score: 2

    Brain: Pinky we have to get out of here
    Pinky: NARF how we gonna do that brain
    Brain: Pinky what is that riduclous thing on your head?
    Pinky: ZOGG! Oh this? The nice lady put this over my head so my mind control implants can't be set off by radio's
    Brain: That's it! We'll reverse engineer your mind control implants and adapt them to humans. We'll control them via radio waves!
    Pinky: Why would you wanna do a thing like that brain?
    Brain: WHy, WHY TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!

  32. AAVS, WWF, Greenpeace ... by The_Lightman · · Score: 1

    I guess all the aforementioned organizations would have something to say about these "scientific" experiments...

    http://www.aavs.org/
    http://www.wwf.org/
    http://www.greenpeace.org/

    1. Re:AAVS, WWF, Greenpeace ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So?

    2. Re:AAVS, WWF, Greenpeace ... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      dammit...I was expecting a joke about controlling wrestlers... : (
      so disapointed

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  33. similar project at umich by GPPL · · Score: 1

    there was a group at u. michigan that did the exact same thing with a cockroach a while ago. iirc, they found that it worked well at first but the signals became ineffective after a while.

    then again they didnt have much time to test it; it didnt live long

    --


    Your mother implements multi-vendor protocols without synergy
    1. Re:similar project at umich by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      I remember that; I think it was something along the lines of the cockroach started figuring out what was going on when it started feeling things beside it that plainly weren't there. A cool idea, but you either have to eliminate all conflicting sources of information or directly interface with the motor neurons.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
  34. Looks like lemmings! by t0qer · · Score: 1

    Crawling through tunnels in the rubble cut off transmission. But Chapin thinks he has a solution to thatâ"a networked group of rats that would act as repeaters.

    Suddenly I picture 100 rats marching single file down a tunnel. Now if they can teach them to build bridges, dig across, dig down, parachute, block and explode you could play lemmings for real!

  35. I am a rat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And like a rat my pleasure center is stimulated by karma so I post.

  36. related research by jsse · · Score: 2

    with roach. At least, with tecnology advance, they are doing it with less disgusting little creatures...oh wait.

  37. yahoo by pingywon · · Score: 1

    yahoo reported that months ago ,and it was also on here before..what gives ?

  38. whats new in it? by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2

    hrmmph, I have a device in my home. Its totally non invasive no electrodes nothing, but just the presence of it can completely mind control anybody. It can completely hypnotise the person, and make it do what the controller wants to. It can make persons but the chocolates, get a shirt which is not needed at all, or just splurge on anything.
    In case you are wondering what am i talking about, well its the TV, or the idiot box. No electrodes, no funny fires, just plain old mind control :-)

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:whats new in it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that thing is flawed. It doesn't work on humans, only on consumers...

  39. What about this?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    abc def ghi

  40. LOGO by czaby · · Score: 1

    I think the appropriate language to program rats would be LOGO.

  41. Another US spy device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember acoustic kitty :)

    http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/archive/5-11-191 01 -0-31-9.html

  42. Wrong way round by pkplex · · Score: 1

    IMO it would be far more usefull to reasearch the opposite... controling stuff with our mind. Id _love_ to be able to type with my mind. Code at the speed of thought... imagine that :) Of course one might have to be carefull their thoughts dont get distracted *cough* opposite sex *cough* :)

  43. Are the /. editors mind-controlled rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sheesh. You'd would think the editors would remember a story that made news even in the mainstream press when it first came out several months ago (even Jay Leno joked about it!) or at least think, "Hm, this topic sounds vaguely familiar" and double-check (or be lazy and put it in the Slashback section, just in case).

    You'd think so. And apparently, you'd be wrong.

    1. Re:Are the /. editors mind-controlled rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To answer the question posed in the subjet line:

      How do you control that which does not exist?

  44. ..it would be better by Archon-X · · Score: 1

    ..the scientists could easily capitalise this with the headlines:

    Rats able to get beer and do mowing!

  45. Didn't you realise... by h0tblack · · Score: 1

    ....all /. editors have been fitted with electrodes so you can force them to press accept for any story you submit. http://mindcontrol.slashdot.org/involuntarysubmiss ion.pl
    hmm actually that url brings some other possibilities to mind....

  46. I'd like to .... by Darth+Paul · · Score: 2, Funny
    teach mine to do the hampsterdance and watch it play DDR.

    And then punish it for failing :)

    1. Re:I'd like to .... by OnyxSphinx · · Score: 1
      I wonder how long until they start doing Pokémon-like trials with these rats?

      Get it past enough animal-rights activists, and you've got the next big thing for Christmas! ...maybe. :)

      --
      -- The silencing of the many will be golden to the few.
  47. Thought I was smart by NPE · · Score: 1
    Damn, here I was all proud of myself for having previously heard of something that made the /. front page. I wonder where I found out about it the first time?

    To get on topic, I think it's really interesting the steps we're making in brain research. Those paranoid among us freak out every time someone mentions brain control, but I see it as one step on the road to understanding our own brains. Who knows, someday we might even understand which defective lobe prompts people to bitch and moan about repeat posts by repeating each others' posts!

    --
    ~NullPointerException
  48. are minds already .controlled buy rats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    0, that was LAST weak. sorry. IT's ALL been "cleared up" buy now.

    you go martha, if i were you (& boy, am i glad i'm not) & they trIEd to make your minor indescretion into sum BiG fauxking deal, i'd take my army of housewives, & have them "invest" in colorful payper & scissors. &, well, maybe in some of those guak0mole' recipes also.

    imagine that, wall street of deceit immersed in shredded payper & vegetable bean dip. serves 'em write? definitely a gooed thing(tm).

    60$ for a bull of soup, that's gotta be nutz?

  49. Controling a Rat's thought process 101. by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 3, Funny

    First you need to think about the type of rat you want to control. Do you want a Democratic rat or a Republican? There are many other alternatives such as a libertarian or a greenie, however those require more advance techniques and the gains are not as a great. The two mainstream types of roduntus politicious are much more plentiful, accessable and cost effective over the long term.

    After you chose your rat. You now need a very large organization that has in it's posession a large amount of money. Now do not be discouraged at this point, this easier done than you would be lead to belive. Simply take all ethics, integrity, honesty and honor that your soul posesses, roll all these traits into a little ball and then sell it on a street corner for crack.

    If you can perform this deed you have the potential to suceed in boardroom shinanigans, backstaping, corporate hoaring, thought theft, frivilous lawsuits, accounting coverups and the ocassiaonal rimjob. Perform these tasks to the best of your ability and you will have a large corporate entity under your control in a matter of a few years.

    Now you can't just pick any type of corporation and make it work with any rat. It just dosen't work out that way. Although there are exceptions there are general rules of thumb for picking the perfect corporation/rat marriage.

    If you want to subvert the thought process of a democrat, you will want a large entertainment company. Such a company might make movies, television, music. Now generally for entertainment the more mind-numbing the product the better.

    Remember that all you future Ted Turner's of the world. If your company produces quality mind-expanding entertainment that provokes thought in your target demographic then you are doomed to failure. A thinking population might actually think when they are in the voting booth. Such thinking causes random unforseen variables to occur like voting for the other guy.

    Oil, is a good industry to use to subvert a republican. Also a company with very deep ties with the military would be an outstanding choice.

    If you product destroys the enviroment and kills alot of people a republican is a sure thing.

    Rat control is a very old and time honored tradition thar predates even the Romans. With tried and true techniques to subvert every kind of rat to your will.

    There is nothing wrong with directly sticking a mind-controling apparatus into the subjects brain. You just need to take into consideration how obvious your influence when your rat is required to make a public speech with elctrodes, and wires sticking out of his/her head.

    --
    >
    1. Re:Controling a Rat's thought process 101. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worth moderating alright, but informative?

      Sheeeeeeesh!!! LOL! Slashdot moderators on crack.

      w00t!

      ~metlin

  50. Boy that's all I have to do! by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    Jam some electrodes in my cats head and give him a shock when he doesn't pee/poop in the box!

    --

    Gorkman

  51. Control by tezzery · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they use a joystick for this..

  52. redundant. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2
    Man already has a device that can control what he does.

    That device is called woman.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  53. This is not news . . . by Liberal+Mafia · · Score: 1
    Scientists have been able to do this for so many years, the concept of doing it with humans even appears in an old science-fiction novel, Woman on the Edge of Time, by Marge Piercy. Piercy describes doctors using it on people in mental institutions, to "help" them.

    This is not particularly newsworthy. The main problem with turning humans into robots in this fashion, like in Piercy's book, is that you have to cut away quite a bit of brain tissue to implant all those electrodes. Then again, most people don't use their brains that much, anyway . . .

  54. old news? by sjwt · · Score: 1

    isnt this pritty simulre to
    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/05 /0 1/1918223&mode=thread&tid=126
    mind you, im currently a touch drunk,
    and cant be bothred to read..

    guilty as charged..

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  55. Rats! this has already been posted! by twoslice · · Score: 1

    By the same editor too, go figure...

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  56. Tasty chicken dish @ your local Chinese restaurant by alexburke · · Score: 2

    Rat Mind Control

    Well, not exactly mind control


    Well, not exactly chicken (but don't ask what).

  57. Human version. by saintlupus · · Score: 2, Funny

    no mention of when a human version would be available.

    It's called television.

    Reprogramming humanity since 19xx...

    --saint

  58. THis is 3month old by cheekyboy · · Score: 0

    drudgereport.com had this 3months ago

    sigh... your fast

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  59. How is this different then... by LordZardoz · · Score: 2

    What makes this different then putting one of the electrodes on each of its legs, and one on its ass? Rats are smart creatures, and it is conceivable that these things hurt. It could be that they simply trained the rat to respond to pain stimulus?

    END COMMUNICATION

  60. It's simple really... by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Because the Slashdot search engine has to be one of the worst in existance. I sure don't have time to wade through the mess the words rat, mice, and control return. apparently, neither do the editors, though they expect the same out of you.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:It's simple really... by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      SQL>select * from stories where title like '%rat%';

      2 rows returned.

      SQL>select * from stories where title like '%mice%';

      2 rows returned.

      SQL>select * from stories where title like '%control%';

      4,062 rows returned.

      Or would a query like that bring down oh-so-poor MySQL?

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

  61. rats rule the world by sigxcpu · · Score: 1

    you have all read "so long and thanks for all the fish"
    you know that it's the rats that are in control.

    --
    As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
    1. Re:rats rule the world by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

      No it's white mice.

      --
      >
  62. damn skippy by moby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it seems that the readers are more knowledgeable of previous stories than the actual ones in charge of posting...
    this story is instantly recognizable as a previous posting... would've taken me about 10 seconds to find as well!

  63. old stuff by lazelank · · Score: 1

    this was in my local newspaper months ago... the same paper that has the headline: "man arrested for stealing underwear." seriously.

  64. This sort of thing wouldn't work well on humans by Damion · · Score: 1

    Since this relies on manipulating the rat's senses, it wouldn't be very effective on humans. If you had something that caused a person to feel like there was something pushing their right side, they would very quickly learn that the sensation was false and ignore it. A rat doesn't have this sort of reasoning power, but humans can always override their instincts.

    --
    Common sense is what tells you the world is flat.
    1. Re:This sort of thing wouldn't work well on humans by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

      No but this would.

      I have this apparatus hooked up to your brain. Now I move the stick to the left and you move right. Oh wait didn't I tell you, I hooked it into the part of the brain that registars pain.

      As soon as you regain consciousness again, we'll give it another whirl. Then you can start by mowing my fucking lawn, after getting me a beer.

      --
      >
    2. Re:This sort of thing wouldn't work well on humans by Kobal · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't work either. As tolerance to pain builds, it wouldn't stand for long, even in rats. Plus you could get better results by applying the stimulus known as a good whacking.

    3. Re:This sort of thing wouldn't work well on humans by Damion · · Score: 1

      That's not mind control, that's conditioning (or brainwashing, if you like). It relies repetition, and the effects would extend well beyond the time you wanted to control the person for. Mind control would cause no ill effects to the subject, and its effects would disappear one the subject was released from its control.

      --
      Common sense is what tells you the world is flat.
    4. Re:This sort of thing wouldn't work well on humans by Treeluvinhippy · · Score: 2

      Who cares. I would still get my lawn mowed.

      --
      >
  65. Simple mechanism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The operation of the "rat mind control" is very simple. I was involved in experiments with rats, and the professor explained that my experiment followed closely with how the rat mind control works. Essentially, there is an electrode placed in each medial forebrain bundle (MFB) of the lateral hypothalami. This area of the brain, found on both sides of the brain, are known as the pleasure centers of the brain. The pleasure center is activated when the rat looks in the direction that the operator of the rat wants the rat to go. So, essentially, it is a reward for when the rat starts moving or looking in the direction that the operator wants the rat to go, and thus, the operator can control the direction the rat goes in.

    To make an analogy, remember the old Looney Tunes cartoons where food was lowered in front of an animal, and the animal would follow the food. It seems such a simple deception works for rats!

  66. Controlling Humans remotely by SgtXaos · · Score: 1

    I can't get images from "Spock's Brain" out of my head...

    --
    -- Don't call me "Sir," I increase entropy for a living!
  67. Ugh... by Chexsum · · Score: 0

    We already have force feedback mice IIRC. :\

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
  68. I'll make bill gates go right! by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1
    Damn, didn't work.


    Oh, it's rat mind control. Not rat bastard mind control.

  69. re by derago · · Score: 1

    i remember a tale where this guy only used a flute and fluted a flute loop to get the rats outta town, so why is this news?

  70. Wow that's primitive by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

    This kind of think always makes me realize just how little we really know about the brain and the body and just how primitive our research and medical treatments are. This is right up there with some crazy experiment from the 1800s.

  71. Alternate headline.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mouse controls Rat

  72. MOD THIS UP!! by HiroProtagonist · · Score: 1

    Somebody PLEASE mod this up!

    --
    --Remove chicken to e-mail
  73. No worries... by mark-t · · Score: 2
    Human beings are quite different from rats.

    For example, we are quite capable of making conscious choices that override basic and natural instincts -- This is because our brains are evolved enough to visualize not only the immediate consequences of an action. In fact, we can visualize not only definite consequences, but even the likely and improbable ones.

    For example, we can choose to go on a diet, refusing the basic instinctive need to always completely satiate hunger whenever and wherever it is felt. We can choose to abstain from sexual activities, we can overcome chemical dependancies, we even take knowingly suicidal actions based on nothing more concrete than a single hope or belief -- all done by an act of conscious will.

    We learn by more than experience, we can be verbally told something and take the idea within it, and hold to it faster than anything else - defying logic, defying instinctive, and definitely defying natural behaviour.

    What does this all have to do with the subject, you may ask?

    If someone tried to hook up a human being to one of these things, they might find that the person could get excessively violent in his attempts to resist being controlled. We, as people, have historically shown contempt for being manipulated or enslaved -- many would even rather die. I have no doubt that attempting to control a human being with something like this (and that's even _IF_ the declaration of human rights is revoked, which would prohibit this outright anyways) would prove most unsuccessful when measured against its effiacy with simpler life forms. It simply wouldn't be worth the effort to find compliant people.

    1. Re:No worries... by kcelery · · Score: 1

      If the person who has a pleasure electrode implanted is allowed to press the "pleasure" key, he is most likely to be turned into a key- pressing junkie.

    2. Re:No worries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting.. but think about it as a herione addict. Doing what we like is addictive. That is why we do them. Hook someone up to feel happy when they do something they will want to do it.
      You are assuming people with fight against this, well the ones who are hooked up would like it. Ask any rehab clinic if the patent doesn't want to get better they won't, and if they are happy why should they want to?

    3. Re:No worries... by mark-t · · Score: 2

      Doubtless, but my point wasn't that ANYONE would fight it, just that enough would that it wouldn't be practical to waste effort finding people who wouldn't put up a struggle.

  74. Why? by HanzoSan · · Score: 2



    Why do intelligent people invent devices which help evil less intelligent people enslave them?

    What good is a mind control device?

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  75. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They've got you fooled too!

    The white mice are just a front!