Slashdot Mirror


Gamers Drive High-End PC Market

TibbonZero writes "CNN reports that "Gamers drive souped-up PC market". They talk about the cost of high end computers, as well as their place in the PC Market. For some reason I thought it was playing solitaire that drove us to buy a Geforce 4 ti 4600..."

294 comments

  1. GTA 3 by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    I had to buy a new video card to play this game. My VooDoo 3 wasn't cutting it anymore....

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:GTA 3 by moonbender · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shhhh! My parents think you need a high-end PC for studying computer science (hah!) and duly support me buying one, you're costing me real money here! ;)

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:GTA 3 by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 3

      Like at work...

      "Yeah boss, I need a larger monitor to display more code and a faster processor to compile faster!"

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    3. Re:GTA 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the exact reason I upgraded too!

    4. Re:GTA 3 by Maniakes · · Score: 1

      "Yeah boss, I need a larger monitor to display more code and a faster processor to compile faster!"

      I actually do need this. The code I could get by with a small monitor, but a large one is nice. As for the processor, it takes 10 minutes to build the whole project and 2 minutes to just build the part I'm working on. It was even worse on my old computer.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    5. Re:GTA 3 by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Id rather have a larger monitor and a slower CPU than a fast CPU and a small monitor. Size matters.

      I want to have more than one xterm open on the screen at a time, alt-tabbing is ok, but I need to see contents in one window while im woking in another.

    6. Re:GTA 3 by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I actually do need this. The code I could get by with a small monitor, but a large one is nice. As for the processor, it takes 10 minutes to build the whole project and 2 minutes to just build the part I'm working on. It was even worse on my old computer.


      Exactly, the size of the monitor doesn't really matter to me, but it needs to be a good enough display that I can sit in front of it all day without eye strain setting in. My monitor is 19", but that's only 2" above the average around here (17" on all new computers), and it actually cost about what they were paying for the 17" monitors anyway (because we bought it at a local computer store instead of buying it with the computer from Dell). Build time when going to the new computer on the average project was cut to less than 3 minutes from 10 minutes, and I no longer have to turn off Outlook while I'm running Visual Studio (which means I can actually get those emails they keep asking me about).

      Besides, with a 16MB ATI Rage 128 Ultra and the network connection in this place, I wouldn't even dream of playing most of my games on this thing. My computer at home works and plays better than this one, but at least this one is more than just tolerable.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    7. Re:GTA 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 minutes? blah.

      It took over half an hour to build a project I worked on with the system I was given to do it on.

      It took 30 seconds on a 486.

      Using an original IBM XT w/ 20Meg HD in 1993 really sucked.

    8. Re:GTA 3 by crawling_chaos · · Score: 3, Funny
      but I need to see contents in one window while im woking in another.

      <HOMER>
      Mmmmmm stir-fry...
      </HOMER>

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    9. Re:GTA 3 by squidfood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I work with high-end 3D visualization of scientific (climate) data, and we've called this "the Nintendo Effect" for at least 10 years. "The Nintendo Effect" just means that (since hardware is sold cheapo to make returns on games) we government scientists each year will be able to update to the "next-to-hottest" generation graphics system at prices affordable to gamers, e.g., $500 or less. And we do, too.

      "Er, that quake engine we all just installed was tax-supported investment in the hardware industry. We'll see returns on it. Really."

    10. Re:GTA 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Damn kids!

      We dropped off our boxes of punchcards at the window and came back the NEXT day to pick up the printout. To find that the program crashed due to a fencepost error.
      And we liked it that way!


      In other news, CNN reports: "Water is wet".

    11. Re:GTA 3 by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 2

      10 minutes?


      Bah. Kids today.


      Not five years ago I worked on a project where builds were a day long process. My current project, it's an hour long job.


      Humbug.

    12. Re:GTA 3 by 4of12 · · Score: 2

      Right on (from another scientist using a Lintel system with a good video card and gigabit ethernet.)

      The significant corollary is our preference for quality OpenGL cards in our machines.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    13. Re:GTA 3 by Eccles · · Score: 1

      As for the processor, it takes 10 minutes to build the whole project and 2 minutes to just build the part I'm working on.

      Ooo, you lucky bastard.

      I just got "Build Time 4:16.5" for a one-line change.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    14. Re:GTA 3 by slagdogg · · Score: 1

      Shhhh! My parents think you need a high-end PC for studying computer science (hah!) and duly support me buying one, you're costing me real money here! ;)

      Hehe, that's only partially true.

      Take the MS developer for example: Visual Studio .NET requires several GB of hard drive space required for full installation, quite a beast while running.

      How about the Java developer: JBuilder (like most other Java IDEs) is built entirely in Java! This thing needs at least a 1 Ghz processor to run without serious delay.

      Even if you're a Linux developer -- XEmacs is pretty hefty, and when running a web server, 4 instances of Galeon on 6 virtual desktops, a mail client, 28 consoles ... it gets nasty in a hurry ...

      --
      (Score:-1, Wrong)
    15. Re:GTA 3 by UberChuckie · · Score: 0

      ... and about 1Gb of RAM. The number of coffee breaks I get depends on how many times it garbage collects. :)

    16. Re:GTA 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I started a build of my project in 1977 - it should be done soon.

    17. Re:GTA 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Galeon, 6 virtual desktops, 28 consoles, e-mail client, Licq, X-Chat, KDE 3. Damn, XEmacs really sucks, it's slow :-)

    18. Re:GTA 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      use vi, it doesn't suck

    19. Re:GTA 3 by Hobophile · · Score: 1
      You had fenceposts?! Such opulence! In my day we only had fence rails! We would have killed for fenceposts!

      And we had none of those fancy-shmancy printouts you kids are raving about these days. No, sir, we had rocks -- rocks with illegible binary output scrawled on them with a piece of chalk! And we liked it!

    20. Re:GTA 3 by Aceticon · · Score: 2
      I work with high-end 3D visualization of scientific (climate) data, and we've called this "the Nintendo Effect"

      For a moment there I thought the "Nintendo Effect" was the name given to some part of the global warming that's due to newer and hotter game machines:
      • Everytime Intel puts out a new processor the Earth heats up another degree
    21. Re:GTA 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      21" Trinitron/Gnome to work on and 17" Trinitron with fvwm2 for tailing logs and displaying system stats... ..and why compile on your own machine? That's what users' boxes are for... ;)

    22. Re:GTA 3 by Pete+(big-pete) · · Score: 2

      Id rather have a larger monitor and a slower CPU than a fast CPU and a small monitor. Size matters.
      Yup - I couldn't agree more, as I said in this recent comment.

      -- Pete.

    23. Re:GTA 3 by mackstann · · Score: 0
      Even if you're a Linux developer -- XEmacs is pretty hefty, and when running a web server, 4 instances of Galeon on 6 virtual desktops, a mail client, 28 consoles ... it gets nasty in a hurry ...
      i cant comment on emacs (ew), but you would be amazed at how much stuff you can run with not very high memory usage.

      i'm running both galeon and (new 1.1!) mozilla, a bazookarillion xterms, a few instances of vim, irc client, mp3 player, couple other little gui programs, apache, bind, ftpd, ircd, exim, mysqld, and probaly some other stuff i am forgetting. ram usage right now -- 94MB! woo!

      now, this is on a p233....not exactly fast...but mozilla 1.1 is AMAZINGly fast compared to 1.0, and even leaves galeon in the dust (galeon with gecko 1.0 that is).

      i cant wait for my dual duron system to be complete!
    24. Re:GTA 3 by Pii · · Score: 2
      Rocks with binary!? What I wouldn't have given for that!

      We were stuck with Unary. Try coding with all one's! We were waiting for the Sumerians to finish up the specs for Zero!

      Binary indeed. Good day Sir.

      --
      For those that would die defending it, Freedom
      has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  2. duh by Guipo · · Score: 0, Funny

    I mean, cmon, we need 1 gb of ram, a 128 meg vid card, and 2800 mhz P4 for winbloz xp right?

    --
    Theonlyuse of monkeys is to testthings onthem.Some peoplemay say"Hey That'scruel!"and myresponse is"I don't like monkeys
    1. Re:duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahahahahahahahaha

      You wrote "winbloz" instead of "Windows"! Classic!

    2. Re:Duh by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2, Informative

      ** THIS JUST IN **

      CNN has exclusive information about the availability of high-end surgical equipment and the medical institutions that seem to be driving the market!

      Gee, people looking to push the envelope are, hmm, pushing the envelope?

      I know every now and then someone comes out with a brilliant study stating what many of us believe is painfully obvious (poor eating habits aren't good for you?!), but it makes you wonder if those performing them are just looking to have data backing the assumptions or are lacking the spark of reason.

      --
      Error Reporting Failu

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    3. Re:Duh by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 2

      That was pretty much my reaction. It's primarily (though not entirely) gamers who require the soup'ed up PCs.

      Since switching from coding to the business side of things, my computer at work is pretty much used for email, web-browsing and word-processing. MS Word doesn't run noticibly faster on my PIII work than on PII-266 desktop at home, nor my on my previous Pentium-90 home laptop. My typing speed just isn't getting any faster.

      Sure, a massive pivot-table in Excel can chew a lot of CPU-cycles sometimes, but overall my business use and most of my home use is mostly I/O-bound applications. (My computer is largely a typewriter and an email client.) I don't play games, so the tiny bit image manipulation and coding I do at home doesn't justify a anything more powerful.

      It's been 6 years since I bought my home computer, and so far the only upgrade I've needed (a larger hard-drive and a little more RAM) was for WinAmp and my MP3 collection.

      --

      I can spell. I just can't type.

    4. Re:duh by peterpi · · Score: 1

      urr, yes actually! :P

    5. Re:Duh by Bastian · · Score: 2

      Wow, that's about as good as two days ago, when my local paper put an article on the front page of the business section stating that greed played a part in the Enron accounting scandal.

      Good job, boys. You sure scooped the whole industry on that one! //////////////BREAKING NEWS///////////////
      President Kennedy has been shot! //////////////BREAKING NEWS///////////////

      In other news. . .

      Graphic artists drive the Wacom tablet market, nerds drive the Linux market, and morons drive the news media market.

    6. Re:Duh by The+Dobber · · Score: 1


      CNN also has exclusive coverage of the release of the P4 2.8 Ghz, with a followup report on the first review.

    7. Re:duh by windex · · Score: 2

      you get used to it. its more fun when you've got high karma and spend equal time trolling and contributing like a good little slashboy.

    8. Re:duh by Guipo · · Score: 0

      well i've been reading, not posting for quite some time. I better start thinking before posting. Guipo I'm just gonna scurry away now.

      --
      Theonlyuse of monkeys is to testthings onthem.Some peoplemay say"Hey That'scruel!"and myresponse is"I don't like monkeys
    9. Re:Duh by Seomus · · Score: 0

      If you look in their Health section, they also report that sex is where babies come from.

    10. Re:duh by peterpi · · Score: 1
      Trolling kicks ass. Some of the most entertaining posts I've read on /. have been trolls and first posts.

      *Can't wait to gather enough karma to troll some more*

    11. Re:Duh by Rainier+Wolfecastle · · Score: 1

      This is completely off-topic (well, except for the CNN bashing that is), but is anyone besides me getting sick and tired of hearing about the Terror on Tape spiel they have going right now? I mean come on, what's the point?

      They get hold of tapes that are over a year old and then want to try and extrapolate what they see so that they can guess what they're up to right now. Unless I missed an installment or two, they haven't even shown a direct link between the tapes and the attacks last September, so how can it possibly indicate to them what Al Queda are up to right now?

      But, I'll take the ToT instead of my morning briefing on missing kids/scientists of "interest" any day.

      Damn you CNN, you used to be good. Now you just want to be a regular network station. For shame.

    12. Re:Duh by motardo · · Score: 1

      this is WAY off topic (well, maybe not really with Al-Qaeda's hijinks), but:

      The goggles! They do nothing!!

      I love that episode

    13. Re:Duh by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 0, Troll
      nerds drive the Linux market

      The Linux what? Oh, you must have mistaken "market" for "a small, selfish group of malcontents who want everything for free and will bitch and moan until the sun goes down for the last time if anyone attempts to actually turn it into a market in the economic sense". Easy mistake to make.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    14. Re:Duh by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      I would think really sick rich people would drive the high-end surgical equipment market....

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    15. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Linux what? Oh, you must have mistaken "market" for "a small, selfish group of malcontents who want everything for free and will bitch and moan until the sun goes down for the last time if anyone attempts to actually turn it into a market in the economic sense". Easy mistake to make.

      Keep standing up for poor ole Microsoft and the rest of the market... nobody understand them because they just don't own enough! </sarcasm>
    16. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh ^2 !
      It's not because YOU, ME or ANY slashdot reader has known this, that this means it's *obvious* news.
      I'm pretty sure that a *lot* of CNN readers/watchers think it's business users who always want the faster the better.

  3. Well.. Not Quite. by citizenc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It isn't gamers directly -- it's John Carmack, et all, over at id Software who drive the high-end PC market; gamers have to buy the latest and greatest card just to be able to run the next id game. (Doom 3 is going to be HUGE, but it's going to require a beast of a computer to run.)

    1. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by sllort · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not just Id games. Check out The saga of CmdrTaco's quest to play Neverwinter Nights - he built the machine basically as a NWN kiosk, and had a lot of trouble doing it.

    2. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by ShadeEagle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget EverCra^H^H^HQuest. One of the more recent patches, which enabled a player-run marketplace (The Bazaar) caused said zone to be crawling with people.... which causes the graphical lag to be insane.

      300+ people in a zone that was probably designed for half that ;-)

    3. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by biohazard99 · · Score: 1

      When he started with his "I'm building a game box" series, I really thought it was taco bitching about XP just to prove his 31337n335, but after last nights escapade with a new hp notebook, a HP 812C Printer and XP's insitence that it was a HP 820C, I began to understand his frustrations. I was able to bring up XP Pro cleanly the first time on my box and haven't had a bit of trouble out of it since (0 crashes/lockups, it does reboot once a week for disk doctor to run), but it is really picky about hardware, especially legacy systems.

    4. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Informative

      NWN ran just fine on my computer w/ a 1GHz CPU and GeForce2 video card, until the motherboard took a hit from a screw and I couldn't boot the system any more.

      Of course, just as the hardware gods cursed his chances of playing NWN by hitting him with just about every failure in the book, they cursed my quest to upgrade (rather than simply replace the dead motherboard) by deciding that a 300W power supply just isn't enough to run a P4-2GHz computer w/ a 64MB GeForce2 GTS, 2 hard drives, DVD-ROM, CD-RW, 3 fans, and SBLive w/ LiveDrive (480W did the job, when in doubt go overkill).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    5. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by Edrick · · Score: 1
      I've got myself a nicely tuned 800MHz Athlon system (with Radeon graphics, Audigy sound). It isn't the fastest out there nor is it the greatest anymore, but it managed to handle every game I threw at it until NWN. Neverwinter Nights brought my machine to a crawl, and even on the lowest graphics settings was slow. I found this very disappointing as many similar Forgotten Realms games play perfectly fine on my computer.

      In the quest to make a very visually appealing game, NWN turned into overkill as even on the most minimal settings I cannot enjoy the game. Warcraft 3, though, runs perfectly : )

    6. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by afidel · · Score: 2

      Hmm the PC I built last summer will run it, albeit not with all the candy turned on. Athlon 1.2Ghz, 1.5GB ram, SB Audigy, Nvidia GF3 Ti200 128MB. I built it for around $600-$700 and from what I have read it will run Doom3. If you wanted to buy an equivilant machine from say alienware it would probably cost you well over a grand, but that is the beauty of DIY.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      LOL, last time I checked there weren't any games similar to NWN. BG2 doesn't count, completely different animal.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    8. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by kingred · · Score: 1

      I used to work at Infogrames testing various video cards with Neverwinter Nights. I can honestly say that with the right settings NWN is playable on a 400mhz PIII with a mid-level video card.
      Of course, there was no way we could test every combination, and the list of things that could bring NWN to a crawl on your system is limitless.

    9. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by PunchMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's not just Id games. Check out The saga of CmdrTaco's quest to play Neverwinter Nights [slashdot.org] - he built the machine basically as a NWN kiosk, and had a lot of trouble doing it.

      (I want to replace the case fans with those translucent 2-tone red/blue case fans that I saw at LinuxWorld


      I was going to pick up NWN, but once I saw on the box that the "Optimal System Requirements" included a 2 tone case fan, I thought I'd hold off. I want maximum performance out of the games I buy.
      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
    10. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was his point. You can't run the game as it was designed to run. I know a lot of people that will be greatly disapointed when they have to turn down features in the game with their GF4TI and Athlon XP systems. If for ANY reason they play at a disadvantage, then you can bet they will be going out and buying new hardware.

    11. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A high end PC is one thing - I can use that for other stuff - but I just had to spend 200 euros for a new video card so I am not totally shut out by the newer games.

      Do the graphical features I can now see in these games make the games more fun to play ? ( That is the bottom line for games, isn't it ? )

      -> No!

      Games manufacturers need to break the tie to the new features in new graphics ( and sound ) cards and write games that _optionally_ use the new features, but run fine without them. Because, IMHO, they add nothing to the gameplay, and they definitely do not add 200 Euros worth, of anything.

    12. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by cronot · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same situation here. Looks like the guys at Bioware should have done a better testing and profiling of that beast. Even after a long delay to release the game, apart from the fact of being slow (not just on graphics, but on stuff like loading areas, saving/retrieving games, etc.), it still feels very buggy... yes, it crashes, and has some strange behaviors sometimes. And don't come and tell me that it might be a hardware flaw, because all the other games I have doesn't behave like that.

      Then again, I just can't get away of it... That's why I'm getting ready to buy a new computer with a new card.

      Yeah, I know, I'm a consumer whore... :-P

    13. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by gid · · Score: 1

      Heh, I remember when Doom first came out, pentium systems didn't even exist yet, it ran like dirt on the 486's, even on a dx-66. I never really enjoyed multiplayer (by then Doom 2) until I first played it on a p60 that ran it smooth as silk in DOS, as win95 wasn't out yet. Oh and I remember thinking why would anyone want anything more than 320x200!? That's crisp as can be!

      That's probably what Doom3 is going to be like, I don't know how feasible it will be to get 80 fps on current hardware. You might even have to wait a year before cheap hardware will become available to the masses. It seems like they're aiming really high with doom3, as I've read a few places that they're planning on stretching the doom3 engine out for quite awhile.

    14. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by golemite · · Score: 1

      You're wrong... high end computer (and component) sales are driven by a) gamers who love benchmarks and b) clueless consumers

      When Carmack even admits that Doom 3 is targeting feature sets introduced with the GeForce1, you begin to realize how far back game developers are behind the hardware. How many games even utilize bumpmapping and other new features introduced in previous generations?

      No, people buy hardware to have the newest things and the fastest things. Who knows what the difference between a 12,000 and 13,000 3DMark score is? But that extra 1,000 marks makes many a people's day. The difference between 200 and 300 FPS in Quake? It might matter to some, but I have no idea what it means, only that if your computer can do it, it's cool ;).

      Why do i have a ATI 8500, GeForce3 Ti200, AND a Geforce2? Beats the heck outta me, cause games sure don't need them-- but I'm sure many others out there have similar dilemmas.

      --
      http://www.s4biturbo.com/
    15. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting... You claim that john carmak is just now implementing feature sets from a CARD THAT NEVER EXISTED?
      The First Geforce core was the Geforce2 and it was the successor to the TNT2. All 'Geforce 1' cards were feature stripped Geforce 2 based cards, as there was NEVER a Geforce 1 chip -- period.

    16. Re:Well.. Not Quite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ?
      The first Geforce was the Geforce256 AKA Geforce 1. It used SDRAM, swiftly followed by the Geforce256 DDR AKA Geforce 1 DDR. The Geforce 2 was released about a year later, followed by the Geforce 2 MX, which was its tuned-down budget version.

  4. Duh by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 5, Funny

    CNN reports that "Gamers drive souped-up PC market". Good job CNN.

    Capt'n Obvious strikes again.

    --

    Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
    Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
  5. Gamers or Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not necessarily the gamers that drive the market, its the system requirements for games coming out. The target platform/system specs for the next generation of games keeps rising, forcing gamers to upgrade, else they're left out in the cold.

    Do you think that they're designing Doom 3 to run on a pentium 2?

    1. Re:Gamers or Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, Gamers drive the market (because they DO upgrade so they're not left out in the cold)

    2. Re:Gamers or Games? by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not necessarily the gamers that drive the market, its the system requirements for games coming out. The target platform/system specs for the next generation of games keeps rising

      Last I checked, though, none of my games say aluminum case, plexi-glass window, custom paint job, or neon lights, which accounted for a good part of CNN's discussion of the subject.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  6. Tell us something we didn't know.. by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

    pr0n and gamers have always driven the home market.

    NEXT!!! *grin*

    1. Re:Tell us something we didn't know.. by kisrael · · Score: 5, Interesting

      pr0n and gamers have always driven the home market.

      heh, pr0n drives about every new AV (or just V) technology.

      Though I'd argue that pr0n is more dependent on bandwidth than CPU horsepower.

      But, I'm still pretty happy doing all my gaming on home consoles. Why would I want to get my butt kicked by 12-yr-olds with nothing better to do than hone their skillz all day? Cluster some friend's around a 36" TV and have a grand old time, and a much more affordable upgrade schedule.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:Tell us something we didn't know.. by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, It is nice to be watching 10 porn videos, while ripping mp3s of the 70's porn style music, and chatting in #hotseattle on irc. Now Intel has released its 2.8ghz cpu, I can be even more productive!

      gotta make sure I post this anonymously...

    3. Re:Tell us something we didn't know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, they are up to 2.8 GHz, I must have missed that memo. *wink*

    4. Re:Tell us something we didn't know.. by DavidBrown · · Score: 2

      >>Though I'd argue that pr0n is more dependent on bandwidth than CPU horsepower.

      Hey, it's not the bandwidth that counts, it's how you use it.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    5. Re:Tell us something we didn't know.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's all well and good but where do you stick your shlong?

    6. Re:Tell us something we didn't know.. by kisrael · · Score: 2

      You know, I have no idea why my previous comment has been mod'd up 3...

      Anyway, come to think of it... it's not the speed of your machine OR the width of your pipe (err, bandwidth)...it's the size of your drive, baby.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    7. Re:Tell us something we didn't know.. by kesuki · · Score: 2

      That's old news, the far more user friendly dMac, vMac, and biMac provide all the hot lovin a PC(1) user could want. http://bbspot.com/News/2000/7/new_macs.html

      (1) Where PC stands for "Personal Computer" and not "100% IBM comPatable Clone" and definitely not Politically Correct.

    8. Re:Tell us something we didn't know.. by TobyIRC · · Score: 1

      uhhh... cpu horsepower DOES have an effect on video, just take my p133 with 64 megs of ram (and thats after the upgrade!). I cant watch movies encoded in most of the new algorithms, specifically DivX... what happens is, the sound keeps playing while the video goes ahead, pauses for about 30 seconds, goes ahead a jump, pauses again... life with cheep parents... (i take donations!)

  7. Well... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

    DUH!

    In other news, audiophiles drive the high-end speaker market too!

    Christ, I bought my new ATI card just to get shiny water in Morrowind... that's actually kind of pathetic, now that I think about it.

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    1. Re:Well... by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      I was going to make virtually the same post with a little more explanation....

      Is there some other use for a computer????

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  8. Umm... by drunkmonk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, yeah. I will officially give up computing when I need a two gigahertz P4 and a $500 video card to do a Word mail-merge...

    1. Re:Umm... by slimme · · Score: 1

      If you use software that will be available, I give you 4-5 years. Windows 2008 and Office superxpplus will probably require a two gigahertz P4.
      The video card you need will cost you less than $100.

    2. Re:Umm... by Maniakes · · Score: 1

      I will officially give up computing when I need a two gigahertz P4 and a $500 video card to do a Word mail-merge...

      With Apple rendering the GUI in the video card, this may not be that far off. We'll miss you, drunkmonk.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
  9. Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a bunch of weenies. Games, games and more games. This is EXACTLY why politicians can ram shitty laws down our throats. You losers are too busy playing games to vote. Tell the TRUTH, when was that last time, if ever, you voted?

    1. Re:Games by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

      Yes.. the legal age of voters should be 12...

      Then and only then will the Democrates get back in power...

  10. Taco has this filed under the right department by Compulawyer · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Right next to "oxygen is necessary to sustain human life" and "enough beer makes ugly people attractive."

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    1. Re:Taco has this filed under the right department by stud9920 · · Score: 1
      enough beer makes ugly people attractive
      I'm not more attractive when I'm drunk
    2. Re:Taco has this filed under the right department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says you.

    3. Re:Taco has this filed under the right department by Aceticon · · Score: 2

      enough beer makes ugly people attractive

      And i thought that a beer-belly was unactractive...

      Then again maybe this line is sponsered by the BIAA (Beer Industry Association of America)

  11. High End vs. Souped Up by aseh · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you read the article, it's really more of a fluff piece about people who build custom souped up computers that have neon lights and look like battle ships. More of a fringe market, as opposed to the consumers and businesses that actually drive the high end computer market.

    Kind of like the people eternally tinker with their cars, adding chrome trim to every possible part in an automobile. Interesting subculture, but not one that really has much of an impact on Toyota or Nissan.

    - Aseh

    1. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by RobertTaylor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      People who lower the suspension in their cars should be shot twice in the back of their heads.

      Manufacturers spend millions of pounds developing these cars, but a wanker in an anorak ten years later knows MUCH better how to get the best ride/handling balance out of it, obviously. Do they bollocks.

      *ahem*

    2. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Also noteable was that the market was considered mature. "It's not going to grow" was what one of the analysts said. While gamers may drive the custom-PC market, consoles are running the game market.

    3. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the guy I was following behind last night who didn't want to achieve the speedlimit lest his truck bounce and smash itself on the group 1" below his suspension system.

      While he did get to the speedlimit, it was typically just before he had to stop for the next light.

      ARGH. very frustrating to be behind such a driver.

    4. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. People who mod their cars are fucking morons. If you're going to spend all that money trying to get a fast, cool-looking ride just buy a fast car instead of trying to soup up your shitty Acura.

    5. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by rgmoore · · Score: 1

      Well, some of those people actually know what they're doing. As you say, the ride/handling aspects of a suspension are a balance, and the designers have picked a point that they think gives a good balance between the two. The problem is that the optimum point for a street racer may not be the optimum point for the ordinary drivers those designers were thinking of when they chose that balance point. That means that a street racer may well have some reason to adjust the balance for more handling and less ride.

      The people who really need a boot to the head are the ones who manage to mess up both ride and handling in the interests of looks. Everyone knows that getting optimum handling from an ordinary car frequently involves lowering it, so some people will get their cars inexpertly lowered in an attempt to make their car look fast. In the process they kill their ride and handling. There's a wonderful web site ridiculing these bozos, but be forewarned. Some of the cars on that page are scary.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    6. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Manufacturers spend millions of pounds developing these cars, but a wanker in an anorak ten years later knows MUCH better how to get the best ride/handling balance out of it, obviously. Do they bollocks.

      I used to (heck, I still do) laugh at these people as far back as high school. Mostly the Mustang lovers, but more and more Honda Civics. Lowering the suspension, adding spoilers, noisy exhaust, and of course the obligatory Powered By Honda stickers. I think those racing stickers are supposed to add .0003 hp to the car! They all talk as if they know more about a car's suspension than the engineers at Honda that designed the damn thing.
      For a great laugh check out the Riceboy page

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    7. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      There are some exceptions to that...

      Yes, manufacturers spend a lot. But when developing, they have tradeoffs. A stiff ride (good handling) vs. a smooth ride (bad handling) - Unfortunately a majority of cars sold for the American market default to the comfort (read: shitty handling) end of this spectrum. There's also the issue of cost - Good suspension parts cost much more $$$ than regular stock suspension parts.

      That said, most ricers don't know squat about proper suspension upgrades and take things too far/go the wrong way. (Like the Nissan with an ungly sheetmetal wing bouncing down the highway I saw a few days ago) But a properly done suspension upgrade (Like Eibach Pro-Kit springs) FOLLOWED BY A REALIGNMENT can do wonders for a car. (For example: The Pro-Kit for a Chrysler LeBaron lowers it by about an inch, and gives MUCH better handling without sacrificing too much ride due to the fact that they're progressive-rate springs, not a feature the stock springs had. 1" is reasonable, esp. considering that most late-80s and early 90s Chryslers rode pretty high) FYI, I believe Eibach makes the stock springs for some high-end cars, such as McLaren, so they're not some cheezy market-fad-to-ricers outfit.

      Most ricers just cut their springs rather than putting in replacements designed for their car, and that's where they go wrong. Their car bounces like crazy, and none of em' bother with the necessary realignment after they screw up their suspension.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    8. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by Smedrick · · Score: 1

      Haha...I love that site.

      Reminds me of a rant from The Greatest Page in the Universe.

      --
      "I strongly urge both the faint of heart and the faint of butt to leave the room at this time."
      - Strong Bad
    9. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by armyofone · · Score: 1

      People who lower the suspension in their cars should be shot twice in the back of their heads.

      Don't you think shooting them once would be enough?

      Seriously though, if people want to waste their money on this kind of stuff, why do you care so much? Does it really make your life any worse? Perhaps you should try working on your own anger issues instead of lashing out at these poor fools. Sure, they look totally stupid driving around in those things. So what? Let them have their fun.

      --
      "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
    10. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about I shoot you in the back of the head Mr Upity British Bastard. It's my money and my car and I'll drag it if I want to.

      "Do they bollocks." *ahem*

      WTF does that mean? It isn't even a complete sentence. Take your stupid Mini and have your wife drive it up your ass and I'll follow her in my Rice Rocket.

    11. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by kaisyain · · Score: 1

      Actually it does impact Toyota and Nissan. When Ford was coming out with its Focus it spent a lot of time and money working with aftermarket parts suppliers so that that subculture would be ready to hit the ground running with the Focus' release. Ford did this because their market research had shown how much of an effect those people have on car sales. Not only do they count as sales but also are a strong advertising force.

    12. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd prefer if idiots didn't use public streets for racing. If they want to risk their lives fine but don't risk my life, my neighbor's, pets, etc. If they have the $ for modifications then they can afford to rent time on a race track.

    13. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      ehem.. the actual cost isn't going to how to make them better, but cheaper, and reasonably good at the same time(most manufacturers). you don't actually needo to spend gazillion dollars designing a niche market car anyways (oh i forgot tvr has the r&d size of gm's).

      otherwise alfa 156sw and 156GTA would have the same suspension arrangement don't you think?

      you don't think leaf springs of 60's american rocket don't need improvement?

      you'd think that dealers wouldn't let you option for performance pack including a stiffer ride(consisting of eibachs)?

      you'd think racers on (reasonably stock) cars would leave the suspension alone too?

      rallyers use stock suspension too!

      you know, when proper brakes were option in american cars the manufacturers damn well knew the cars would need them.

      anyways, to keep this on topic, some guys think overclocking will fry your chip faster than normal use(oh well, i got lots of uses for it after 30years). and actually it's the group of rich(or without expenses) f***s that keep the envelope going, others just buy the reasonably priced stuff.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    14. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by wilson_c · · Score: 1

      Manufacturers spend millions of pounds developing these cars, but a wanker in an anorak ten years later knows MUCH better how to get the best ride/handling balance out of it, obviously. Do they bollocks.

      You don't know what you're talking about. Unless you're buying a Maclaren, just about every car's performance can be substantially improved from its stock condition. Most consumers would hate a stiffened, lowered civic with a loud exhaust. The ride is uncomfortable, the handling is much more sensitive than people expect from a compact commuter vehicle, and the noise is annoying

      But as a sports car it is substantially improved experience. People have successfully modded their ~100hp civics up close to 300hp. If you're going to do that you better adjust the suspension or you're power's only good going straight. And if you can accelerate that fast, you better get brakes with equivalent power.

      Car designers have to consider cost, fuel economy, emissions standards, noise regulations, clearance specifications, safety issues, and what will sell to the greatest number of people at the price point specified in the design document. None of these considerations enhance performance.

      And finally, why do you have a problem with anyone making modifications for purely aesthetic reasons? Are you such a utilitarian purist that you live a completely unadorned life? Does it really bother you that much if some 16 year old kid enjoys the fact that he's 2 inches lower and it makes his car look slightly sleeker? Or perhaps you get angry at women wearing shoulder pads or houses with decorative shutters that won't shut.

      Chill out and let the kids enjoy their rides. Don't worry, soon they'll turn into grumpy old cranks like you and spend their days getting angry at other people's pleasure.

    15. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by RealUlli · · Score: 1
      Manufacturers spend millions of pounds developing these cars, but a wanker in an anorak ten years later knows MUCH better how to get the best ride/handling balance out of it, obviously. Do they bollocks.

      Nope, now it's you talking crap. It's just a matter of optimization. Car manufacturers optimize their cars for the combination of ride smoothness, handling, fuel consumption, maintenance and a few other parameters they think they can sell best. Car tuners cater to people that want to sacrifice some comfort for better handling, or some handling for better offroad capabilities.

      Sure, you can buy cars that do most things well, but be prepared to pay a fortune. For exapmple, look at the Audi Allroad in the Ski-to-the-max version by Willi Bogner. (Yes, you can buy that car!) The car has probably better handling than all american mainstream cars, with the possible exception of the Viper and the Corvette, but even then it gives them a run for the money (>400hp on a 4WD...). It does Offroad fairly well (no match for a real offroader, but when do you need it?). Most american cars might beat it with respect to ride smoothness, but that's a tradeoff for the handling. Fuel consumption, well, I think it's pretty good at that, except compared to much smaller cars. BUT: it costs AFAIK something around 100k Euros...

      Now take the contrast: Get a Ford Mustang, tune it. Usually, it will be quicker, but not as smooth as the default. Forget offroad...

      Regards, Ulli

      --
      Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
    16. Re:High End vs. Souped Up by phriedom · · Score: 2

      "not one that really has much of an impact on Toyota or Nissan"

      Here is a list of things that belie your assertion, Mugen, TRD, Ford Racing, Mazdaspeed, Nissan SE-R Spec V, Focus, Vibe/Matrix, Protege5...and I could go on. These are all things that these large companies are doing to respond to the desires of the import tuners or "rice boys" They are designing cars specifically for this "niche market" which is large enough that one could argue it isn't a niche at all, but a proper market segment.

      --
      Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
  12. also another thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For some reason I thought it was playing solitaire that drove us to buy a Geforce 4 ti 4600...

    that maybe... but it's the fat DSL pipe and proliferation of pr0n that made me buy a 23" apple cinema display.

  13. When I voted for President, right after I finished by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

    playing my PS2.

  14. Pong anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still have a old Apple ][+. But pong doesn't have much for hardware requirement.

    WhatMeWorry!

    1. Re:Pong anyone? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

      Coming soon, Microsoft Pong XP! With incredible 3D ray-traced graphics rendered in real time with anti-aliasing!

      Actually, you could probably do this. Maintain the 2D function of the game, but suspend it above a background and have a lightsource... How long would it take to ray-trace a ball, two walls, and two paddles?

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:Pong anyone? by Allen+Varney · · Score: 2

      Coming soon, Microsoft Pong XP! With incredible 3D ray-traced graphics rendered in real time with anti-aliasing!

      It wasn't Microsoft, it was Hasbro, early 2000. The original Pong game, remixed with 3D accelerated graphics. Debuted to a resounding thud.

      Think I'm joking? Check out the Gold Guide list of reviews.

    3. Re:Pong anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, ISTR that one of the XBox graphics demos showed an array of mousetraps, each of which was set to launch a ping-pong ball. One additional ping-pong ball was then dropped onto one of the trap triggers...

  15. In other news by unformed · · Score: 3, Funny

    CNN reports that street racers drive the market for souped-up stock cars and aftermarket performance boosters.

  16. Falcon Northwest by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 1

    I've heard a lot of good things about Falcon NW building solid gaming PCs, but I feel bad for people who have to pay their hugely inflated prices from something most avid computer people can do on their own; build a PC.

    --
    -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
  17. NEWS FLASH! by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny
    This just in, most of those who insist on graphics with high refresh rates and resolutions are running the most popular type of software that utilizes such technology.

    In a related story, most people who buy ink-jet printers use them to create hard copies of their electronic documents.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  18. Its a requirement for online games by Palos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're playing multiplayer games a highend system is defintely a requirement. If you can't react as quickly as your opponent you're dead. This is espically true for FPS, but also goes into mmorpg's and the like where the person with the least amount of graphics lag/etc wins. People will take any little advantage they can get, from the fastest video cards/systems, to the best links. This isn't much of a suprise.

    1. Re:Its a requirement for online games by dokutake · · Score: 1

      Unless you're running the bare minimum for the game to run, graphics lag isn't much of a problem, it's connection lag that's the problem.

      --
      - Peter
    2. Re:Its a requirement for online games by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      cant you just hack your drivers to display semi-transparent walls or wireframes. When i play counter-strike i use my own plain textures - red for terrorists, blue for counter, that way they show up better.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:Its a requirement for online games by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Framerate's one thing, but it's all for nothing when your ping times chew ass. Nothing like getting fragged at 200fps. :D

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    4. Re:Its a requirement for online games by Bluesee · · Score: 2

      This will sound dumb, but I just replaced my PII 400MHz with a PIV 2.4 GHz and boy, my internet performance has increased a whole hell of a lot! I always assumed ti was the throughput of my 56k modem, but - just like NetMedic was trying to tell me - it was CPU cycles that were limiting my gaming experience!

      I am soo relieved! And now my son tells me he can win on the new computer, but not on the old computer as he can now cast spells in the heat of the battle.

      I learn something new every day, generally...

      --
      SDMI: Finally! Music that won't rip or burn! Brought to you by the fine folks at RIAA.
    5. Re:Its a requirement for online games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yes, but:

      I was #1 for a week on Unreal Tournament deathmatch (according to CLQ) on a 550MHz with a TNT2.

      I'm just about as good as I used to be with my 1.8GHz DDR rig with a Ti4600. Graphics are prettier, but it takes a long time to get used to a different system.

      Skill always trumps nice shiny hardware.

  19. So a good pr0n game would.. by Genjurosan · · Score: 2, Informative

    require a 10Ghz system with a 600 gb array?? *grin*

  20. They forgot about Early Adopters by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Early Adopters a/k/a Joe 6-Packs are the bread & butter of the high-end market. I'm sure many /.ers have dealt with this type who only need to run IE and Solitaire yet are buying new systems every six months because "this one gives me more megahertz".

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    1. Re:They forgot about Early Adopters by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      My friend lives in a one room efficiency apartment, but he's got five computers hooked up to his DSL. Sadly, he's more of a spender than a techie. I helped him upgrade to his second machine, a 486 box he mail-ordered, from the 8088 box I'd sold him to run his MIDI card and MIDI gear with.

      He has a Gig of RAM in all his boxes and even went out and bought Windows 2000 because he needed it to make use of the dual processor motherboard he'd put together. Truly he's a screwdriver shop's best customer, though he provides the screwdriver.

      Last time I talked to him about he was superstitious about running anything but Windows 98 on his machines, because he said 'Windows 95 machines won't network to Windows 98 machines, and Windows ME sucks.' I haven't checked recently to see how his Windows 2000 machine is coming along in awhile now.

  21. And this is news ? by FooMasterZero · · Score: 1

    Must be a really slow day to publish this kind of rhetoric for /. and CNN

    1. Re:And this is news ? by liquidsin · · Score: 2

      Slow news day? Hardly! Why, Intel has already released TWO new 2.8 GHz processors today! Now THAT'S news!

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    2. Re:And this is news ? by FooMasterZero · · Score: 1

      dually noted but being told that games drive the high end pc game market isn't

  22. research science hard at work! by JayDoggy · · Score: 1

    From the article: "Games certainly are the most demanding (on computers), short of decoding the human genome," said Michael Gartenberg, research director at Jupiter Research.

    Hey, this should make the feature list for Quake 7! Frag your opponents, then analyze their gibs in realtime for the likelihood of having developed genetic disorders (had they lived, of course).

  23. Thanks for the wonderful grasp of the obvious CNN. by RunzWithScissors · · Score: 1

    I thought I bought a $200 graphics card to run eXcell!

    Seriously though, I think that this is one of the big issues keeping Linux from multiplying rapidly on the desktop or at home. I mean it's great that Linux can interoperate with disk shares and do all the backend net service stuff like DNS, LDAP, etc. But that doesn't make my friends want to migrate to it. Where are our games? NWN has clued in, now if only Star Wars Galaxies, UO, DAOC, and EverQuest would figure it out!

    -Runz

  24. That is about the most obvious statement since.... by Lawmeister · · Score: 2

    Bush's comment about the way to prevent forest fires is to cut down the trees. [doh]

  25. In other news by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1

    It was reported today by reuters that most of the reported news is written by news reporters. Asked why this was not obvious, one news reporter replied "I haven't read the report".

    The study also mentions that most newspapers are read by subscribers, and those that purchase newspapers at the news stand. Secondary causes of newspaper reading included finding a rumpled one on the train, and stealing an extra one when someone else purchased one from a machine.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
  26. Newfangled gizmotronic gobbledygook by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 3, Funny

    The specs on Kevin Atkison's latest computer could just as easily be for some newfangled street cruiser: Blue neon light tubes, Corsair XMS 3200 DDR memory and a GeForce 3 video card, all wrapped in a shiny aluminum Lian Li case with a clear plastic side window for easy viewing.

    I guess my grandma is writing for CNN now...

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  27. IF I EVER TYPE IN ALL CAPS, PLEASE KICK MY A$$! by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

    laff...

    1. Re:IF I EVER TYPE IN ALL CAPS, PLEASE KICK MY A$$! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I ever meet you I will kick your ass.

  28. This reminds me... by thelinuxking · · Score: 1

    Of iMacs...when some people I know bought them just because of how they looked, not because of what the computers were actually like. I don't see why anyone would need blue neon lights and a clear case like that...

    Also, unlike fancy looking cars, fancy looking computers don't get you women.

    1. Re:This reminds me... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Also, unlike fancy looking cars, fancy looking computers don't get you women.

      Of course, just like if a woman has a nice car, guys will swarm around her, but if shes a geek girl with neons and a window, she aint gettin' any.

      t_allardyce - Making non-pc comments more pc :)

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  29. Windows by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

    Here I was thinking that people upgraded their PCs to run the latest version of Windows. :)

    1. Re:Windows by Lxy · · Score: 2

      That's gotta be a close second. At least in terms of CPU/RAM/disk. In terms of video cards, when a 32 MB AGP card can be had for $40, who besides a gamer needs anything higher? Even the CAD geeks get along quite well at 32MB.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    2. Re:Windows by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      You can squeeze out a little more performance with more memory on the graphics card. Also, games that come out in the future will use all that memory. Never mind that you wouldn't be caught dead using a two year old video card when those games finally come out...

    3. Re:Windows by afidel · · Score: 2

      Hehehe you must not have very demanding CAD geeks, mine use the boards with 256MB frame buffers and like 128MB of DDR primary video ram. They also tend to get new dual CPU workstations with the top of the line CPU's every 12-18 months. Basically if they can shave a couple minutes per operation off they can do twice as much work, and when they are being payed mid 6 figures it makes sense to buy them a $10-15K system once a year or so to keep them productive.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Windows by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      I know they aren't are card, but don't forget the SGI systems with up to 2GB of video ram.

  30. geek factor by jkfresh · · Score: 1

    Having an uberpimped machine will give you superior frame rates and all that kind of stuff.. But it also gives you a huge geek factor at lan parties.. If you ask me, that's also worth the price. :)

    1. Re:geek factor by No_Space_Bar · · Score: 1
      Yes,_but_also_consider_that_huge_geek_factor_is_in versely_proportional_to_get_laid_factor.

    2. Re:geek factor by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      dude, chicks dont go for jocks anymore, they are dumb and lame. Everyone knows they totally dig hardware.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:geek factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey i want a girl with a huge geek factor, who says she wont get laid?

    4. Re:geek factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A slap in the face and two kicks to the groin for using the word "uberpimped."

      Goodday to you, sir.

    5. Re:geek factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Girls love RAM!

    6. Re:geek factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of the "woa" factor associated with motorbikes. When on my Honda CBR250RR, I get lots of looks --- mostly (but fortunately not exclusively) from other guys. They're not looking at me [I'm male], but at my bike. Complete stranges will walk up to me and start talking bikes!

      Admittedly, I've found myself striking up similar conversations of other bike owners ... often those of CBR600F4i-s... Scary.

      Incidentally I do also have a PC-60 Lian Li case for my 120GB RAID 10, AMD XP1900, GEFORCE 3 TI 500, XP PRO system with a window. My girlfriend thinks it is cute. And she likes the black Dell 17" flat screen. So much that I have to stick to the beige Redhat 7.3, 768 mb, 40GB, Geforce4mx, AMD TBIRD 1.4ghz system. Although, hooked up to a Nokia 21" running KDE in 1600x1200 I don't think it's too bad a deal; geeking out with sexy girlfriend is great. ;)

    7. Re:geek factor by Jearil · · Score: 1

      You know I thought the same thing, so last year I bought my gf at the time 64MB of RAM for her laptop on valentines day. She seemed to like it... after about two weeks of being really confused.

      Girls just seem to want me for my technology anyway.. I have lots of neat toys (is what you get when you put what could be beer money to gadgets)

  31. What about Linux Kernel Developers? by qurob · · Score: 1


    I'm sure these guys use some monster systems. You can't just sit around for a half hour while you build the latest kernel.

    1. Re:What about Linux Kernel Developers? by British · · Score: 2

      No, you see, Linux users drive the nonexistant "low end" computer market, retreiving old obsolete systems from dumpsters and turning them into firewalls, web servers, etc. Not much money changes hands, if at all. :)

    2. Re:What about Linux Kernel Developers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every once in a while bail must be posted for the inveitable tresspassing charge filed against those dumpster divers.

  32. Four words: by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 2
    Interesting subculture, but not one that really has much of an impact on Toyota or Nissan.

    Four Words:
    Type R Factory Option

    OK, so three words and a letter....

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:Four words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words Rice Boy

    2. Re:Four words: by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      Two words Rice Boy

      Three words: MR2 Spyder Turbo
      <lust> And all I need is 5 grand</lust>

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Four words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word:

      Fag

  33. It's the number, not the genre... by Njoyda+Sauce · · Score: 1

    Several software genres besides games push the technology envelope. Computation heavy imaging apps or other number crunchers crave processing power in the form of CPU/GPU or both. The reason gaming as a genre forces the issue is that there are more gamers buying hardware than imaging geeks. This tidal wave of demand forces the technology to keep up. Companies see a demand as cash and rightfully so.

    However, should number crunching apps that break crypto or 3-D modellers for cyberworlds become more popular than say games like doom3, you could rightfully say that it was the hackers and artists driving the advent of technology, not the gamers.

    --

    You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
  34. Lewis Black said it best by rattler14 · · Score: 1

    quote
    i went to school in north carolina... and i thought it was a smart state...they took 15,000 to fund a study to find out why prisoners wanted to escape from prison. Don't you think for 500 dollars they could've asked anyone of us. /quote

    but in this case, someone just wasted their time stating the obvious

    --
    my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  35. Oh, is that who it is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here I thought it was the guys trying to get their Kernel Compile down under a minute (Rumor has it some guys at IBM can do one in under 30 seconds now...)

  36. Gamers! by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

    I just went and played Little Blue Men for the first time. Of course that one's a little older - its three years old. I don't think it would run on anything less than an XT with 64K of RAM. Yeah, that's not really a fair comparison.

    I suppose I should talk about a more modern game, like All Roads. Oh wait - that one has about the same memory requirements. I guess nothing has changed in three years.

    If what you were looking for in games was imagination and inspiration, then you wouldn't need a new machine for it. Obviously that's not what is desired - people want better and better graphics. The gamers drive the game market.

    If this were not the case, then gamers would not buy faster computers, or better graphics cards. They would simply play the games that worked on their system, content to settle for fun instead of pretty and fun. After all, its not like there is a shortage of games, no matter how old your system is (and the examples I gave are case in point).

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  37. Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Hah! You must mean Linux! You think you can install RedHat 7.x on a Pentium 166 with 16MB of RAM? Hah!

    The f--ing box even says, 500MHz, 160MB RAM, 2GB HD, etc etc preferred for X desktop install

    1. Re:Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you NEED at least 1 GHERTS to run teh linux.

  38. Not kidding by Dirtside · · Score: 2
    For some reason I thought it was playing solitaire...
    It is! My Geforce4 card is so fast, I can finish a game in 0.7 seconds!
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Not kidding by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, a friend's benchmark of computer speed was to see how fast the cards fell after you won a game of solitaire. By the we had P200's the cards fell too fast to see.

  39. In other news.... by Space_Nerd · · Score: 1

    The sky is blue, the water is wet and women lie.

    --
    Everybody has a purpose in life, maybe mine is to lurk in slashdot.
    1. Re:In other news.... by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 1

      CNN News Flash:

      The Pope is Catholic: Vatican Shocked!

      Bears shit in the Woods: Forest dwellers up in arms!

      Iraq calls George W. Bush an Idiot: Millions Agree!

      --
      I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address
  40. Not quite.... by Xzisted · · Score: 1

    I just needed a cheaper solution for keeping my apartment warm. Instead of running the heat now...I just put GeForce Vid cards and Athlon XPs in my computers and let the BTU's fly out and keep my apt. warm.

    Now if I could just find a way to turn the things into Air Conditioners.

    --

    Honesty may be the best policy, but apparently by elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
  41. So true... by cronot · · Score: 1

    I've got a GeForce2 MX200. Sure it's a crappy card, but Quake 3, Counter-strike and a lot of others have a more than acceptable performance, around 72fps. (Most other games goes around 60~80fps).

    But NWN does a mere 20fps on that card. Very frustrating.

    1. Re:So true... by Nameles · · Score: 1

      What resolution, color depth and how big the texture size and other stuff? I've a GF3, and I pull about 13fps at 1024x768x32 with 64mb texture packs.

    2. Re:So true... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Generally if your getting less than 20fps on a game its highly recommended you decrease the resolution and or rendering options. You'll find it to be a much better experience.

    3. Re:So true... by Gossy · · Score: 1

      Are you running on a 486 or something? (Yes, I know no AGP...)

      I get in the 100-200fps at that resolution in Q3, CS etc (which are pretty old games). I'm running on an Athlon 1800+ with a GF3 Ti500, but still, you shouldn't be getting that slow.

      You *do* have the VIA 4in1s don't you? (Assuming you run a VIA mobo)

    4. Re:So true... by cronot · · Score: 1

      What resolution, color depth and how big the texture size and other stuff? I've a GF3, and I pull about 13fps at 1024x768x32 with 64mb texture packs.

      I use 800x600 on almost all games (including NWN). Anything above that gives me something around 30~45fps (on other games, of course, not NWN). For color depth, on NWN it's 32bpp (it doesn't (officially) support less color depth than that), 32Meg texture size (even though my card has 64Meg). EAX 2 is enabled for sound (i've got a SB Live). On all other games I use 16bpp. While the image quality gets just a bit worse (more on Q3, actually), I still prefer this than losing some 10~20fps.

      I've got an Athlon TB 800, 256Megs, and I'm using the latest drivers of everything (including the Via 4in1 drivers). Even though the CPU isn't too high end, I still think the video card is more to blame.

    5. Re:So true... by Nameles · · Score: 1

      I've a 1.2 TBird with 640MB RAM, and last time I checked I had EAX enabled (I too have an SB Live). I can't stand 8x6 on my 19" monitor, so I run 1024x768. I should try bumping down the textures to 32 and bumping back the detail (cause I zoom all the way out anyway). I'll try next time.

      What video card do you have?

    6. Re:So true... by cronot · · Score: 1

      [...] I should try bumping down the textures to 32 and bumping back the detail (cause I zoom all the way out anyway). I'll try next time.

      Tried that here, didn't help much. Even using the 16Mb textures didn't a big improvement.

      What video card do you have?

      Thought I said above... an nVidia GeForce2 MX200, 64Mb. Yeah, I know, crappy card and all that, but it does just fine on almost all other games I have. Whatever, I'll just end up by replacing it by a GF4 eventually. Too bad it costs so much over here.

    7. Re:So true... by Nameles · · Score: 1

      That's actually the standard gaming card I sell in my PCs, it's easily overclockable.

      GF4 is expensive all around. Still $350 for a 4600 last time I checked, I'm waiting till I can get a 128mb 4200 for $120 with shipping or the 4600 for $200.

  42. KDE 3 and Evolution drive the high-end PC Market! by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shhhh! My parents think you need a high-end PC for studying computer science (hah!) and duly support me buying one, you're costing me real money here! ;)

    Hey, I needed a Pentium IV at 2.0GHz just to be able to get KDE 3's file browser to display my MP3 directory in under a minute.

    And if there were truth in advertising, it wouldn't be called Ximian Evolution. Instead, it would be called Ximian Continental Drift.

    www.glowingplate.com/dissent

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  43. Forced to upgrade Windows for the game?!?!? by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recently loaded NWN and was forced to download the latest SP for Windows before I could play. Yeesh. Overall, it is a symbiotic relationship -- the games push the envelope on what is currently possible driving the hardware and software to go further. New hardware and software drives games to again push the envelope on what is now available.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:Forced to upgrade Windows for the game?!?!? by siskbc · · Score: 1

      You forgot about Redmond releasing a bunch of bloated, buggy, unoptimized code, ensuring that the operating system needs a new computer to run decently. I don't know if that's covered under "pushing the envelope" or not...

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    2. Re:Forced to upgrade Windows for the game?!?!? by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      DirectX is even worse. DirectX is a versitile wrapper utility for game developers, allowing shops like Blizzard to build games faster and cheaper than ever before. Which game publishers like because it means more profits for them.

      Unfortunately this translates into requiring the latest version of DirectX in order to play the newest games. Naturally, Microsoft is only supporting DirectX for Windows.

      Many of us NT folks were pissed as hell to learn that MS no longer supported DirectX on windowsNT. This effectively meant that gamers using NT had to upgrade to XP in order to play new games.

      If that's not a monopoly leveraging its influence, I don't know what is.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    3. Re:Forced to upgrade Windows for the game?!?!? by BumbaCLot · · Score: 1

      Gimme a break. NT didn't even have DirectX for years after Win95/8. No true gamer has ever ran NT. And those who made the switch to 2k(as I did happily after enough new games were out) were very happy with the stability. Will I be pissed when they discontinue DX for 2k? Hell yes. But please don't act like you were gaming since 93 on an NT box.

  44. In other news.. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Rich assholes drive the high end car market

    screw AC.. mod me down..

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  45. Moreover, it the folks that develop DirectX & by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

    While game designers are using tools like Maya and 3DS MAX to develop more complex models for games, the engines and technologies that are used to power these games are written by entities that have closer connections to the hardware manufacturers. Also, Maya is owned by SGI, which in turn has a huge role in Open GL. "Designed for $os", should actually read, "Designed for DirectX $version"

  46. Crazy video card prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else find it crazy that you can buy both an Xbox/PS2 and a Gamecube for the same price as a GF4 Ti4600 or a Radeon 9700? Talk about the bleeding edge...

    1. Re:Crazy video card prices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes however the PS2 and Gamecube's main processors added together run at a lower clock speed than the GF4.

  47. Re:Thanks for the wonderful grasp of the obvious C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get more FPS on Linux than Windows on identical hardware. Even using WINE. Know what you are talking about.

  48. But, but, but... what about browsing the net?!!! by garoush · · Score: 2

    "Gamers Drive High End PC Market"

    But, but, but... what about those adds on shop-at-home TV channels that keep telling me how much faster, better, etc. my dial-up^M^M^M^M^M^M^M web browsing experience will be once I buy their state-of-the-art faster-than-a-speeding-bullet PC?

    Are you sure that only "games" will run faster on my new high-end PC but not browsing?!!

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
  49. Actually, its my company driving it. by linderdm · · Score: 1

    Ask me how shocked I was when my IT group installed a 64MB GeForce 4 card in a coworker's desktop because her old card was bad? All we do here is simple web programming. Talk about overkill, and overspending!?!

    1. Re:Actually, its my company driving it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the boss' gf/wishes she was his gf/daughter/friend from college

    2. Re:Actually, its my company driving it. by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      IT group installed a 64MB GeForce 4 card in a coworker's desktop because her old card was bad? All we do here is simple web programming. Talk about overkill, and overspending!?!

      If it was one of the GeForce4 MX cards, it is hardly overkill. I know there are cheaper cards, but the lowest model of the MX line can't be much more than a hundred bucks. The GeForce4 MX cards are NOT high-end gamer cards.

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
  50. Comment on Commenters by Coplan · · Score: 5, Informative
    I read through all the comments that are posted right now that havn't already been moderated below my threshold (which is set at 2 for the time being). If I read yet another spoof like "audiophiles drive the high end stereo market" and so on, I'm going to up my moderation threshold again.

    If you READ the article, you'd realize it isn't really about the Mhz, the Megabytes and the Refresh rates. It's about the "Hot Rod" appeal. It's about the guys with clear cases, the guys with neon lights, and the guys with flames painted on the sides of their cases. All you would have to do is click the link and see right there in front of you a picture of a clear acrylic computer case. Logic would therefore lead me to believe that the average person tries to get their comment posted to /. before reading the article.

    Anyhow, I enjoyed the article. While it wasn't anything new to me, it is a niche culture that has turned their computers into center peices and art. This is the generation that loves the I-Mac, and the same generation where the PC Counterparts want to have cool looking cases too. These are the people keeping Alienware and Thermaltake in business. And while a case fan might be essential, one that has brass grilles and neon lights are not. If you read the article, you'd comment on that, not Mhz and GBs.

    How many of you guys are shouting RTFM to the non-geeks that bug you? Maybe we should be shouting RTFA!

    1. Re:Comment on Commenters by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Dude, did you read the article?

      They mentioned that the guys that trick out their cases are also the guys that buy a $400 video card.

      I compare them to audiophiles because both are willing to spend several hundred extra dollars for a minimal increase in performance and both like to invest time making their systems aesthetically appealing.

      You should see some of the sweet setups that some audiophiles have done in their cars and homes - pleasing to the ears *and* eyes.

      High-end niche markets are full of hot-rodders - computers, cars, audio, video, cyclists, skaters, etc - these guys always push the envelope so it's obvious that these guys push the industry in new directions.

      That was my point, but obviously I should have pulled out the crayons for you.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:Comment on Commenters by Coplan · · Score: 2
      My point was that it wasn't about the essential hardware market per-se. I agree with your points 100%. But the article very briefly mentioned the correlation between the $400 video card and the computer case made to look like a troop transport. There is a correlation, but I believe the article to be more about the non-essential hardware.

      Your point is well taken, and again, I agree. But it's pretty fair to assume that a UGO driver is not going to be painting his car with flames, putting glass packs and a super charger on his 3-cyl engine. It's also safe to assume that the average Web and Solitare computer user won't be putting windows with neons and digital hard drive coolers into their computers. It's still the computer market, but its a niche market. Thermaltake doesn't deal with the average user, they deal with a small percentage of the computer users out there. The use of said hardware is interesting. And THAT was my point.

    3. Re:Comment on Commenters by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Let's agree to almost agree

      Group hug :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    4. Re:Comment on Commenters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just agree to shut the hell up why don't we?

    5. Re:Comment on Commenters by thepoolguy · · Score: 1

      I saw a yugo once with a custom plate. I don't know why...

  51. It gets worse by Bastian · · Score: 2

    My brother built a new computer, and XP REFUSES to work with his whiz-bang 120GB hard drive if he tries to run with NTFS. Strangely enough, FAT32 poses no problems, and Linux and BeOS are fine.

    As for the 0 crashes/lockups, I'm honestly not experiencing that. The machine I'm using right now is XP (we're switching over to it at work because the boss decided we weren't wasting enough money yet), and I'm experiencing at least one crash/lockup a day. Plus, the thing seems to have that good ol' Windows 98 lock-up-every-time-you-try-to-shut-down-or-reboot problem. Granted, it's likely a bad driver that is causing the problems and not the OS itself, but then again you'd think the OS would be able to handle errors like these a bit more gracefully. . .

    1. Re:It gets worse by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      My brother built a new computer, and XP REFUSES to work with his whiz-bang 120GB hard drive if he tries to run with NTFS. Strangely enough, FAT32 poses no problems, and Linux and BeOS are fine.

      Does it refuse to work or does it refuse to format the full drive with NTFS? I know I had a similar problem when I got my 80GB drive, but it would format at a smaller amount (I think 60GB, but it may have been 40GB), so at the time I just set the partitions accordingly, and then a couple months later a patch was released that addressed the problem. It doesn't seem to have any problems now as a full 80GB drive, but I guess Ill have to get a 120GB drive to find out if that works (hell, I was planning on upgrading my 20GB drive anyway ;).

      As for the 0 crashes/lockups, I'm honestly not experiencing that. The machine I'm using right now is XP (we're switching over to it at work because the boss decided we weren't wasting enough money yet), and I'm experiencing at least one crash/lockup a day. Plus, the thing seems to have that good ol' Windows 98 lock-up-every-time-you-try-to-shut-down-or-reboot problem. Granted, it's likely a bad driver that is causing the problems and not the OS itself, but then again you'd think the OS would be able to handle errors like these a bit more gracefully. . .


      Ouch. My home system's been running for a few days w/ XP Pro since I finally got the hardware upgraded. Before it went down it had been running for about 5 weeks without a reboot, and before I moved from San Diego it had been running for a couple of months. Overall I'd say I've had fewer stability issues with XP than I had with 2k, though 2k was rock solid after SP1 (and only slightly less than before it).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    2. Re:It gets worse by Osty · · Score: 1

      As for the 0 crashes/lockups, I'm honestly not experiencing that. The machine I'm using right now is XP (we're switching over to it at work because the boss decided we weren't wasting enough money yet), and I'm experiencing at least one crash/lockup a day. Plus, the thing seems to have that good ol' Windows 98 lock-up-every-time-you-try-to-shut-down-or-reboot problem. Granted, it's likely a bad driver that is causing the problems and not the OS itself, but then again you'd think the OS would be able to handle errors like these a bit more gracefully. . .

      Sounds like you need to run Windows Update and actually install all of the updates. You're right, XP does have a reboot issue out of the box on some hardware, but IIRC that was fixed almost as soon as XP launched (last year!). As for why you're getting crashes, it would be helpful to know what software you're running. As long as we're comparing anecdotal evidence, let me just say that the only reason I've had XP crash was because of video drivers and poorly-written games. For normal business stuff (IE, Office, Visual Studio, et al), I've never had a crash that wasn't attributable to my own idiotic coding (and again, that was from playing around with OpenGL while using beta video drivers ...).

    3. Re:It gets worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had similar shutdown problems and finally found I had both power management schemes active in the BIOS. I am SURE I did not change that but anywhooo once I turn off acpi things started behaving better....

  52. Actually by aliens · · Score: 1

    Like all new games it will run best on a beast of a computer. But with Doom 3 Carmack and friends said they made sure you could run it on a low-mid range PC. The only thing is you don't get all the eye-candy turned on.

    MMMmmmmmm, eye candy. When Doom3 is released, hopefully nVidia will have their NV30 out to compete with the ATI 9700. (nVidia if you're reading you know you NEED to have the NV30 out when Doom3 comes out)

    Peace

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  53. Yeah, it's obvious to slashdotters... by arloguthrie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but this was published by CNN, a general media outlet, which makes it an interesting news item. Anytime something that *we* think is priviledged (even obvious) information is reported by major media is significant to some degree. This information may not be obvious to Jane Homemaker who uses her iMac to share photos of the new baby with her parents, or to Joe Schmuck down the street who's still writing socialist manifestoes on his TRS-80. Leave your mom's basement once and a while -- there's a whole world of people out there who are DIFFERENT FROM YOU.

    --
    ----------
    Cheese it! It's the FEDS!
    1. Re:Yeah, it's obvious to slashdotters... by i7dude · · Score: 1

      than you!!!! finally some fucking intelligence!!!

      we do not exist in a bubble, nor should we expect the rest of the populus to "get it" like we all aparently do.

      dude.

    2. Re:Yeah, it's obvious to slashdotters... by i7dude · · Score: 1

      "than you!!!! finally some fucking intelligence!!!"

      ^^^^

      ok about that intelligence thing, i think i just contradicted myself...

      dude.

  54. Games by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 2

    I have heard -- don't recall from where, though -- that EA has future version of it's games already developed, but unreleased because they're waiting for the target hardware to become readily available. (Perhaps this was is an older practice, though.) Certainly, I would think that fast-action video games would be easier to QA on slightly slow hardware.

    I think it's actually be the video card manufacturers and the games manufacturers working together -- these to market sectors drive each other, so it would make sense that they ensure their own future viability by working together.

    --

    I can spell. I just can't type.

  55. .1% of the population always dictates to Industry by sielwolf · · Score: 2

    Read some of the articles at Sirlin.net on competitive game design.

    The gist is that the best games, although accessible to a wide audience, cater to the gamer by rewarding his time and interest with an even higher level of gameplay.

    A game where the boundaries of experience are hard and fast die quickly. Great graphics. Cool storyline. But no replay value. And here we are talking about replay value in terms of multiplayer. The Quakes, Starcrafts, and Street Fighters of the world.

    You can see how this is the same with hardware. The more you invest... in tweaking, prodding, learning... the more you can get out of your machine. The better the performance and the more rewarding of the experience. Sure, 99.9% of the population will never do that to their machine... but they will follow where the gamer has gone.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  56. Actualy a good study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actualy this was a USEFULL study. Prisoners want to escape, but what triggers them to start acting? If you'd spent some time reading the study instead of just using your little soundbite stupidy you would know that the study examined what triggered their wish/desire into becoming action.
    With that information you can reduce/monitor for the stimulus that leads prisoners to act on their desire to escape and reduce the number of prison breaks.

    1. Re:Actualy a good study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The number of prison breaks is so tiny that it is impossible to predict.

    2. Re:Actualy a good study by rattler14 · · Score: 1

      USEFULL? I doubt it. Even if they got rid of all the guys named bubba trying to have sex with you, the bad food, and the chance of getting beat up, people would STILL try to escape. Why? Cause it's prison. It's confining. If i was in prison, i would be willing to risk getting myself hurt/killed/more jail time to get out if i already had 10 to life. Why, cause I wouldn't want to be there. how the hell do you get rid of that in a prison? oh wait, you can't

      15,000 pissed down the drain... but i'm sure you have some other clever response to fight back with, since you are obviously an expert about this, and can't take a joke

      --
      my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  57. GeForce4? Pshaw by (H)olyGeekboy · · Score: 1

    Geforce 4 ti 4600...

    Oh please. The GF4 is *SO* three months ago. I mean, the prices are already down to a much more affordable $330 for those 4600s.

    Now the big ticket item is the ATI Radeon 9700, as it spanks GF4 performance by almost 30%. It's a steal at only $400, if you can find one!

    Talk to me again in a few months and we'll talk about the NV30 chip... ;)

  58. Dammit, enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly, let me own up to the same sin in another post


    . Now can we get off the "traditional media outlets restate the obvious like some great damn insight -- often giving it an alarming spin" meme?!!! This is slashdot, I'm sure that we're all well aware of the tradional media outlets' tenous grasp of reality. Hell, everyone on the web knows what a great benefactor to mankind Alex Chiu is, but not a damn peep about him on CNN!

    1. Re:Dammit, enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll never escape memes! Not even this one! NEVER!

  59. If this were FARK, there'd be an OBVIOUS tag!! by TerraFORM · · Score: 1

    I mean, duh! This is a known correlation.

  60. Hmm... anybody else not inspired? by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So maybe I'm showing my age here, but a painted red computer case with a great gaping hole in the side and a blue neon light does not inspire me to drool about performance.

    I'm much more interested in the specs -- an SMP Alpha or Sparc machine with gigabytes of memory, 64-bit SCSI RAID-5, DVD-RAM for removable storage and a fast pipe to the outside world is much more interesting to me than a single P4 with 512MB memory, IDE hard drive, 56k winmodem and a $2,000 paint+watercool+roundcable job.

    Anyway, when I think 'fast computer look' I don't think something that looks like a Pepsi vending machine, I think more along the lines of those old Thinking Machines setups or even just your basic sun4 pizza box.

    Damn, I am showing my age. I should have kept my mouth shut.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Hmm... anybody else not inspired? by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      You're not alone, old man. :) I'm much more impressed by something's specs than its looks. Sure it's nice to have a clear plexiglass case with neon lights -- makes it way easer to see the dust inside (yeah yeah, unless it's water cooled...). With all that time and money spent on making it look like it's fast you can go out and buy another fast computer.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Hmm... anybody else not inspired? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      Hot rodding is about showing off. It's hard to show off a sweet hardware setup (even with a viewport).

      Sure, I can have a sweet car. Or I can have a sweet car with flashing lights around the windshield, hydrolics, a massive stereo, etc.

      I personally am like you - spend money on the inside, who cares about the outside.

      Some people are into that sort of thing though :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    3. Re:Hmm... anybody else not inspired? by siskbc · · Score: 1

      Here's the way I look at it. Who's probably got the really sweet setup - the guy who spends all his time painting the thing, or the guy who doesn't even know where his computer's case cover is because he never even ?

      A lot of those "tricked out" computers are like their car equivelants. Who hasn't seen the tricked out Honda Civic with the massive spoiler?

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    4. Re:Hmm... anybody else not inspired? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      "an SMP Alpha or Sparc machine with gigabytes of memory, 64-bit SCSI RAID-5, DVD-RAM for removable storage and a fast pipe to the outside world is much more interesting to me than a single P4 with 512MB memory, IDE hard drive, 56k winmodem"

      These are home machines they are talking about, not university workstations. Try not to be so elitist.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    5. Re:Hmm... anybody else not inspired? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Good grief.

      Just because you can't afford one at home doesn't mean nobody can.

      Me, all my case mods (I speak in the past tense, now) were to be cheap. I put an XT-clone motherboard and IBM power supply (the old 63.5 watt one!) into an old 'Leading Edge Model D' case back in the 80's because I couldn't afford a real XT-clone case. What a dremel-tool project THAT was. I remember when buying that case at a swapmeet that the guy told me 'the coffee stain on the case is free.'

    6. Re:Hmm... anybody else not inspired? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      These are home machines they are talking about, not university workstations. Try not to be so elitist.

      I can't help myself - I've got a dual P3 from 1999 and a dual athlon with a gig of ram racked in my basement. No neon, though.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:Hmm... anybody else not inspired? by jtdubs · · Score: 2

      Interesting.

      The G4 desktops.

      Dual processor G4. Can ship with 2GB of DDR. You can get them with Ultra160 SCSI. They ship with DVD-RAM, DVD, CD-RW, CD. They have Gigabit, 100Mb and 10Mb ethernet. Also optional 802.11b (11Mb).

      So, dual proc, SCSI, DVD-RAM, fast pipe.

      And yet, it's still a home machine. Well, an expensive home machine. But still technically a home machine.

      Justin Dubs

    8. Re:Hmm... anybody else not inspired? by DietFluffy · · Score: 1

      The article focuses primarily on gaming rigs. An Alpha/Sparc system won't be very good at that. What you need is an Athlon XP or a Pentium 4.

  61. toys need not be reliable by fermion · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Although this article is obvious, it is also interesting. Toys can drive development of technology. For instance, it is said that some pre-Colombian civilizations had toys with wheels, but no tools with wheels. Toys are a great way to develop technology in a much more forgiving setting.

    Likewise, video games can drive computer technology. Though most people have commented on the lack of a business needs preventing the adoption of bleeding edge technology, I think it is more a matter of reliability. After all, if a computer crashes or makes a slight rendering or math mistake in you game, it is not going to affect anything. It is not like making a mistake in a paycheck or bill of lading. The consequences are miniscule. Likewise, if a computer crashes every couple hours in a game, as long as the game is saved, there is little productivity loss. And of course, if the buggy Intel chip were limited to games, as it should have been, we would have not had such a powerful outcry.

    We see this with the original Mac. It was a very capable machine. I would spend all day and most of my night on it programming, analyzing business data, and writing. It would not crash, and would not make mistakes. The problem was that graphic technology had not advanced enough to make the machine both reliable and inexpensive. We can absolutely thank gamers for our cheap GUI devices.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:toys need not be reliable by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      The problem was that graphic technology had not advanced enough to make the machine both reliable and inexpensive.

      Yes. The stuff in an early Mac was expensive at the time. But: what explains the $3-400 people were expected to pay for a third-party cooling fan to slip into the handhold on that generation of Mac? It seems like coming out of the early days an 'expensive is better' ethos took effect with the Macintosh user that's still never really gone away. It's always reminded me of the rich kid on the block when we were kids who had the Schwinn bike (with all Schwinn-approved accessories). We all had enuff fun on our Huffy and department-store branded bikes (Holiday, JC Penny, Monkey-Ward, Sears, etc.) but we clearly weren't as cool as that guy with his Schwinn...

    2. Re:toys need not be reliable by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      Though most people have commented on the lack of a business needs preventing the adoption of bleeding edge technology, I think it is more a matter of reliability.

      Hehe, yeah right. I think the reason there is a lack of mainstream 3d video cards(i.e. geforce/radeon) at work is because project managers don't want the co-workers to play games and thereby lose (omg!) productivity! Instead they order the low-end vid cards like Matrox g200s or (ouch) ATI rage 128s(usually built in on many motherboards).

      This is despite the fact most of the computers in the office will have hundreds of megabytes of ram, googles of disk space, and eye popping monitors. But they can't get a descent 3d-card...it's a conspiracy amongst "the management" and "us"....

  62. But I thought... by bsDaemon · · Score: 2

    that gamers drove Yugos because they spent all their money on PCs

  63. In other news by barzok · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Water is wet, and water-based ice is cold.

  64. And In Other News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sky appears blue to most people.

  65. Remember Wing Commander? by leshert · · Score: 2

    This has been going on for a LONG, long time. I remember a comment years ago (in PC Magazine? can't recall the source) that Wing Commander drove more sales of 486-class machines than any other software of the day.

    1. Re:Remember Wing Commander? by Winterblink · · Score: 1
      Guilty as charged. Twas the reason I upgraded to the then unbelievably powerful 486-DX2 66MHz monstrosity. That sucka had a whopping 400M drive.

      And to think the average game nowadays using full install comes to at least twice that for space requirements. Feh.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Remember Wing Commander? by lordaych · · Score: 1

      Are you guys serious? I think maybe you're thinking of Wing Commander II, or Wing Commander Privateer. A friend of mine got Wing Commander (the first version) for his 386/16. It ran pretty shitty, actually, but it was because he was using PC speaker audio! I had a 286/12 "Pack-Mate III" from Packard Bell with a COVAX Sound Master II Adlib compatible soundcard. Wing Commander ran FLAWLESSLY on this 286/12 with no slowdown, it was great! The only thing was, I had no EMS/XMS to speak of, so the little animation of the hang on the joystick and the video animations were gone.

      I thought that was really cool of them to design the game in such a way where if you didn't have a completely high-end system, it omitted elements that weren't absolutely necessary for gameplay.

      Anyone remember when Street Fighter II came out for the PC for the first time? High Tech expressions released it, and it was a classic example of a totally botched port. The characters jumped too high, it ran slowly, and sucked in general. Street Fighter II Turbo or some other variant came out shortly thereafter, and was far superior. Man, I yearn for those days.

      Remember Red Baron? 286 = ok. Aces of the Pacific? 386 with 2 megs of RAM. *sigh* How about Budokan -- The Martial Spirit? Space Quest! I remember reading some old gaming magazine where it said "if you have a 286/12 with 40 megs of HDD space and a VGA monitor, you should be able to keep gaming for at least a year." What a relief that was to read...

    3. Re:Remember Wing Commander? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      I remember I finally had to go out and buy a color VGA monitor (paperwhite wouldn't cut it any longer!) when I first saw SimEarth (MS-DOS version). And I'm the guy who ran Windows 3.0 on an 8088 machine with Hercules Graphics.

    4. Re:Remember Wing Commander? by leshert · · Score: 2

      I believe you're right... it was driving 386 sales, not 486.

      When you mentioned the 386/16, that jogged my memory--my roommate had one of those, and it was truly a godlike machine running OS/2 (I remember Gunship 2000 for DOS ran far, far better under OS/2 than under DOS... go figure).

      By the way, AotP was and still is one of my favorite flight sims of all time (second only to Gunship 2K).

    5. Re:Remember Wing Commander? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they're refering to Wing Commander 3, which at the time pretty much graphically destroyed all other games at the time. 640x480 3d graphical glory. I still remember how my jaw dropped the first time I played it.

    6. Re:Remember Wing Commander? by graikor · · Score: 1

      As I recall (and I could be wrong - I am getting old), it was Falcon 4.0 that was the big 486-seller.

      Wing Commander (the first one) moved 386's, and Quake sold Pentiums by the truckload.

      I'm currently buliding an Athlon XP1800+ system just for Doom 3, so I definitely understand the two driving forces in the article - customization and performance tuning.

    7. Re:Remember Wing Commander? by WickerChap · · Score: 1

      Wing commander was definitely a 486 seller. I saw one on a 486/66, and it flew! I personally bought a 486/33 (and later upgraded it to 66) just for Dark Forces... But back on-topic, Falcon 3 was pitched at the 386/486 market, it ran just about on a 386/16 (with the simple flight mode turned on), but Falcon 4 needed at least a decent P2 (I ran it -- just -- with an AMD K6/350, with an Orchid Voodoo 2 card. My new machine (AMD XP1600+) won't run it with 3D acceleration (boo hoo), Direct 3D problems.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the wooshing sound they make as they fly past" Douglas N Adams
  66. Remember the good 'ol days... by lugonn · · Score: 1
    ...when scientific visualization and 3D animation were driving the High-End PC market?

    At least the Media (4th branch of gov) is finally shedding these last bits of falsehood from the general public's mind about computers.

    I mean, everybody knows that computers are for playing games, and the internet is for looking at pr0n. Trying to mislead the public into thinking that computers are empowering the public with knowledge and information is just wrong.

  67. solitaire by DemiKnute · · Score: 1

    I remember playing Solitaire before MS fixed it back in the days of Windows 98 on a P3/733 and when you won the cards jumped so fast you never saw them...the people with the slower hardware were getting the better Solitaire experience. I still wonder if there's an entire of solitaire players out there that don't even know that the cards jump when you win the game.

    --
    .
    1. Re:solitaire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just get a few of your buddies rounded up and we'll be ready to sue.

      Sincerely,
      Alan Dershowitz

  68. Re:Thanks for the wonderful grasp of the obvious C by siskbc · · Score: 1

    And the first time Wine crashes on you during a game, you'll give up on that shit. Please, God, not the "Wine runs all things windows" flamewar again.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  69. Ahh... by ACNeal · · Score: 1

    No, it would be the gamers.

    John Carmack doesn't buy a whole lot of computers. Doom 3 doesn't buy ANY computers.

    If no one really cared about Doom3, no new hardware would be sold.

    It is the gamers that buy the games, then the new hardware to make it run smoother. The consumer drives the market, not other consumed goods.

    Restated, computer manufacturers don't build a machine because a game will run on it better, unless a lot of people want to play that game.

    More over, the games generally run on what is out today, but they run better on what comes out tomorrow. So it isn't even that to play a game a consumer needs better hardware. It is simply the comfort level of the gamer that dictates the manufacturing of newer, better equipment.

  70. But the REAL Slashdot question.... by Jasn · · Score: 1


    ... How does this affect the 2.8 GHz Pentium 4??????

  71. CNN ran out of tapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CNN ran out of tapes to scare the American public with.

    "A tape aquired by CNN demonstrates that the al Queda have already planted weapons of mass destruction under your bed."

  72. Re:Actually sounds like all id Games by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    I had Quake III without eye candy running fine on my PII 266 with 256 MB Ram and a GeForce2 MX, in large open rooms with more than a dozen players it would bog down, but other than that it was fine (30+ fps).

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  73. Still playing 2D solitaire?? by DeadVulcan · · Score: 2

    You mean you're not getting the new 3D rendered 1024 polygon phong shaded playing cards with full radiosity?

    You poor deprived soul...

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
    1. Re:Still playing 2D solitaire?? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      PySol rulez. That's all there is to it. When I want to play solitaire on my windoze box, when I'll fire up eXceed and run PySol over on the headless NetBSD box in the corner. It's pretty damned high-octane, at least some of the cardsets are...

  74. Re:High End vs. Souped Up (somewhat OT) by mwjlewis · · Score: 1
    How much do you know about cars?

    I ask not be flame you, but to truly ask. I have been racing Go-karts and Cars competitively since I was ten. The Ricers that lower their cars with nothing else done go ahead and shoot them. Those that purchase the coil-over suspension, but on the strut braces, increase the diameter of the sway bars, and finally actually KNOW how to drive, are doing it right.

    You mentioned that manufactures are spending millions of dollars working on the design and manufacture of the car. Although, a portion of the money spent in R&D is also spent to cutting cost. This is where the parts that are better for preformance are being tosed with something that will save them $5.00 a car. While 5.00 here and there is not too much money, when you make 1,000,000 cars.... you do the math.

    Unfortunately, you will almost NEVER see this on the road as it is way too expensive, and most people are JUST interested in an additional 5 bhp, and looking like the cars that they see in the magazines.

    I go on drives in a car club of mainly BMW's and Mercedes's. Most of the people driving spend a significant amount of time on the track, auto-X or actual track time.

    --
    www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
  75. Incompetent Reporters by Xtraneous · · Score: 1


    These souped-up machines use the fastest memory chips and arrays of high-capacity hard drives. Tiny fans and water-cooling systems rapidly dissipate heat, the nemesis of speedy computer parts. A powerful graphics card costing as much as $400 directs the on-screen action.

    Tiny fans? Jeez... who wrote that one?

    --
    .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
  76. Gamers == Environmental hazards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, these people have been dumping their PC a couple of months, then some Chinese villagers get screwed by the toxic waste generated by these gamers and their obsessive, wasteful hobby.

  77. once again the US news by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    media is the LAST to realize a fact. I wonder who slapped a reporter with this information. It has been common knowledge in the industry for 3 years now. BTW I just got an ATI 9700....WOOOOHOOO it ROCKS..Playing NWN in 1600x1200 with NO lag locally and only the expected net lag in multiplayer. I ran UT with the max goodies and consistently ran in excess of 150 fps. Very impressed initially, let's hope ATI keeps up the drivers....

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  78. About time by robofunk · · Score: 1

    It's good to see people break the "beige-box" mold. The more mainstream this hobby gets the wilder the accessories that will come out. I wonder if this means that someday granny will have a low-rider email box.

  79. department of redundancy department by Bastian · · Score: 2

    I mentioned in my first post that it was probably a bad driver or somesuch. That is usually the case in the Win9x series, too. My complaint is that I think the OS should handle buggy drivers and such more gracefully. I probably don't need to throw in any standard Linux user digs like pointing out how buggy kernel modules I install (or write) don't cause the whole system to hang. . .

    1. Re:department of redundancy department by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1
      Um, buggy kernel modules can most certainly cause a linux system to hang, and worse. And yes, I've seen it happen. Also, some applications with superuser privileges can do the same. Where have you been?

      --
      "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
    2. Re:department of redundancy department by mackstann · · Score: 0

      dude, linux doesn't crash. dont you read michael's minutes!??!

    3. Re:department of redundancy department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer fries.

  80. Wow, BRILLIANT ARTICLE by dh003i · · Score: 2

    Demanding gamers drive the high end consumer computer market? Gee, that's fucking amazing. I thought those people who just load up Mozilla and OpenOffice were the one's who were creating the demand for GeForce 4 Ti4600's and Radeon 9700 Pro's, along with 2+GHz Intel/AMD chips, and 4+GB of RDRAM/DDR-RAM.

    Really? Ya don't say. Next, they'll be telling us that the Hollywood follks who make movies like Jurassic Park drive the high end systems in the professional world. And that the people who sequence the human genome drive the high end in supercomputers. That's unbeleivable.

    Seriously, I thought that the average user who browses websites needed all that power to handle the pop-up ads. Or that your avg. hormonal male needed that much power to look at porn.

    Next thing they'll be telling us that avid downloarders of music, movies, and porn are what's driving the high end in broadband connections.

    Amazing insights from CNN.

  81. Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Running WinXP on my brand new 2.2GHz P$ with 1024MB RAM is a lot slower than Potato on one of my antique 486 machines.

    As long as micro$oft keeps improving windows with all those bugs^H^H^H^H nice features it will never get any better.

    1. Re:Micro$oft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At doing what?

      Windows on a p3800 can load 10,000 files into explorer for browsing about 100 time s faster than Konq or Midnight commander can on faster hardware.

      The dirvers for ALL PC hardware are considerably more fine tuned on Windows than on Linux. Almost all IO operations on Linux suffer from blocking IO in the drivers.

      Just pointing your ass at the monitor and spraying shit all over /. again I see.

  82. Comments on Comment on Commenters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Logic would therefore lead me to believe that the average person tries to get their comment posted to /. before reading the article.

    That's about as obvious as saying that gamers drive the high-end PC market. :p

  83. Of course you realize this all started... by MamasGun · · Score: 1

    ...with the Mac heads, right?

    --
    "But you've already got a DVD. It lasts forever....In the digital world, we don't need back-ups..."
    -- Jack Valenti
  84. So.. you're wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OOoooohhh. the Evil John Carmack. And his plans to bring down the empire through the use of high target systems specs....NOT.

    Paraphrased from the GameSpy coverage of Carmack's speech about DOOM3:

    He explained that the DOOM 3 technology was, believe it or not, based around the technology that became available with GeForce1-level hardware..."By the time that software comes out that takes advatage of [the hardware it was designed for], usually people don't even have that original hardware anymore. "

    http://www.gamespy.com/articles/august02/quakeco n2 002/carmack/

    He goes on further to say that the NEXT (not the current) will make use of the graphics cards being just now released.

    ---

    He also talks on about supporting a wide variety of graphics cards, to show support for individual features and capabilities. This demonstrates flexibility, rather than demanding people conform to a regimen of high-priced cards.

    People like id are just being customer-centric. There has been a clearly demonstrated history throughout gaming of people willing to fork over outrageous amounts of money for hardware to get the "best image/performance". Voodoo 5500, anyone? Hell, people were lining up to buy the nVidia ti4600. Why WOULDN'T id service this demand?

  85. Re:Thanks for the wonderful grasp of the obvious C by RunzWithScissors · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, I didn't realize that UO, EQ, or any of the others were classified as FPS, sorry I don't know what I'm talking about.

    For those of you who actually care about Linux (NATIVE) clients for stuff:
    Turns out that Sony and Origin among others actually store their MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role Playing Game) data on Solaris or Linux machines, but don't actually make a client that runs on Unix or Linux. When I asked some people over at Origin about it, I was told that there is not enough demand for Linux games, so apparently we're not being vocal enough as a community. I've seen some banter going back and forth on the href="http://starwarsgalaxies.station.sony.com/dig est/forums.jsp> Star Wars Galaxies discussion groups about it, but not to the volume that I would expect for Lucas Arts to actually take our community seriously.

    I think it's time we started bugging game companies to make clients for us. Call them, post to their discussion groups, make youself be heard!

    -Runz

  86. Computer Ricejobs by Geradbaal · · Score: 1

    Sure anyone can make a Biohazard cut-out case, put plexi on the inside and trick it out with a green and yellow neon light, add some Volcano brand watercooling and make that P4 LOOK fast when the performance is retro, like a TRS-80. Tape drives and all.

    These are the same guys that stick chrome coffee cans on the tailpipes of thier rusty '92 Toyota Celica and add a ridiculously oversized spoiler on thier vehicle to improve "performance".

    Again its a marketing scheme. Gaming industry is to computers as The Fast and The Furious is to the Riceboys.

    --

    "I'll have a positivly scathing retort in twenty minits!"

  87. Tsk, Tsk, bitter are we? by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

    Why would I want to get my butt kicked by 12-yr-olds with nothing better to do than hone their skillz all day?

    Do I sense some bitterness after having your innards strewn all over the wall in Q3/CS/TF/SOF.. (pick one)?

    Assuming all l33t gamers are ~12 is a bit weak. I'm nearly 30 and I can't tell you how many times i've heard:
    "You f$$#$in kids are cheating"
    "I'm sure you've been playing since you got out of junior school at 3:15"

    No we're not cheating, no were not 12 yrs old.

    The fact is that you're not very good at the game you're playing and clearly unwilling to invest the time to develop decent skills... and that's just fine.

    But to blame your current lack of skill on the prepubecent state of online gamers, is a poor excuse.

    Nuff said.

    1. Re:Tsk, Tsk, bitter are we? by kisrael · · Score: 2

      Do I sense some bitterness after having your innards strewn all over the wall in Q3/CS/TF/SOF.. (pick one)?

      Assuming all l33t gamers are ~12 is a bit weak. I'm nearly 30 and I can't tell you how many times i've heard:
      "You f$$#$in kids are cheating"
      "I'm sure you've been playing since you got out of junior school at 3:15"

      No we're not cheating, no were not 12 yrs old.


      I'm not half as bitter as you sound!

      But, you're sort of close...my senior year of college (96), my dorm just got wired, and all the underclassman had fresh new Pentiums and I still had my rugged old 486/66...I held my own in Duke Nuke 'Em 'til the level where I was underwater, then my framerate was about... .5 frames a second maybe?

      Sorry if you're bitter about being called a 12 year old...I freely proclaim my relative lack of skills...in particular, I shied away from most PC FPSs after DOOM, ('cept for some Quake) so I never learned how to use the mouse properly, and I know I'd be owned by any half-competent player. (But could probably do OK if we switched to, say, Dreamcast Quake III.)

      And sure, it would be more irritating to be beaten by 12 year olds--I'm jealous of how much free time they have...but I wouldn't accuse my opponents of being any particular age. (Though if they talked a lot of 'L33T I might wonder about their mental age at least.)

      Nuff said.

      Anyone who signs off "Nuff said"...well, they say more about themselves than they do the discussion at hand.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    2. Re:Tsk, Tsk, bitter are we? by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

      "Nuff said" & "'cept"

      These are simple colloquialisms. If you're calling me an idiot, just say so.

    3. Re:Tsk, Tsk, bitter are we? by kisrael · · Score: 2

      I don't care about colloquialisms in general, and your use of "Nuff said" wasn't quite as bad as some...when used in a disagreement, it's usually an attempt to pre-emptively declare victory, as if the person has made such a persuasive argument that surely no one in their right mind could possibly disagree. Sort of like yelling "Checkmate" when the game might not even be half done. So it's not that the person using it is an idiot, but they generally have a bad attitude for productive discussion.

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    4. Re:Tsk, Tsk, bitter are we? by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Actually, "game, set, match" is a better example of something people actually do say to try to claim victory in an argument, probably a better example than "checkmate".

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  88. Second fiddle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, it used to be porn that drove the high-end.

    What is the world coming to? Well, my joystick is made out of real live flesh!

  89. What does this say about PCs vs. consoles? by Animats · · Score: 2
    If the PC is viewed as a game console that sits on a desk and happens to have some additional capabilities beyond gameplay, that has a real market impact. If the main application is games, why not just build game better consoles?

    PCs and game consoles used to be viewed as complementary products, but they're becoming direct competitors. This has major implications for the PC industry. Essentially all business PCs shipped in the past few years have more than enough power. Only Microsoft bloatware keeps the office PC industry alive. Most businesses don't want to upgrade beyond the Windows 2000 level at all. That market is getting to be like the typewriter market - units are bought only to replace existing ones that wear out. Thus, most further sales, if any, must come from the home market.

    Gamers have been driving the home PC industry for two or three years now. An implication of this is that PCs can be viewed as a special kind of game console. The XBox is, after all, a PC in a different case. The main difference between the XBox and a PC is much stronger digital rights management in the XBox. This should tell us something about where things are going.

    And it does. The newest generation of PCs are a lot more "locked down" than anything seen previously, with TPM and Windows XP moving towards an environment in which you don't do anything the content owner doesn't want you to. Remember, the XBox is already there. It's worth noting that, unlike previous generations, none of the current generation of game consoles has been fully cracked. Nobody has succeeded in running an "unauthorized" game on an unmodified XBox, Playstation 2, or Nintendo GameCube. Despite the fact that that's legal.

    So what seems to be coming is "consumer PCs" that behave more like game consoles and less like open systems. They'll be easier to use, harder to mess up, and thus more reliable for the average user, just like a game console. That's the end result of gamer dominance of the PC industry.

    Any questions?

    1. Re:What does this say about PCs vs. consoles? by rmohr02 · · Score: 2
      Nobody has succeeded in running an "unauthorized" game on an unmodified XBox, Playstation 2, or Nintendo GameCube.
      Ok, but the XBox had been hacked to run Linux, so I'm assuming "unauthorized" games aren't far behind.
    2. Re:What does this say about PCs vs. consoles? by Animats · · Score: 2

      Linux on the XBox only works on a physically modified XBox. This limits the market to hardware hackers. Nobody has cracked the encryption which prevents unauthorized disks from booting on a standard XBox.

  90. We have a policy at work by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    that our desktop PC's will never be any faster than the slowest computer in the field (we do mostly Unix development -- and the compiles are all on the server end...) We have been doing this for so long -- that I have also neglected to upgrade my computers at home. I don't if or when this Retro "PII / Amd K6 500" thing will ever catch on with you kids -- but I have noticed that more performance tweaking and memory leaks get caught by people who develop and or test on lower end machines.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  91. College/University faculty Upgrades: WASTE by havardi · · Score: 1
    Faculty and staff at the college where I work are getting new Compaq Evo P4 1.7ghz computers, new iMacs, and G4 computers. The computers they are replacing are typically high end Pentium II, low-end Pentium III and G3/ low-end G4 Macintosh systems.

    WHAT THE HELL? These people are doing absolutely NOTHING besides Email and Word Processing, and maybe a little Filemaker Pro. But they manage to fuck up their computers with DeskFlag, Webshots, Comet Cursor, etc, etc. And then they bitch to their Department Heads, and if ONE person gets a computer upgrade, you can bet every adjacent office will be getting an upgrade soon after that. It's the biggest waste of resources I have seen (with my own eyes). Maybe I'm just bitching because I use a PIII/550 at work :-P At least my boss lets me use linux! Citrix is pretty cool stuff.

  92. Duh by umask077 · · Score: 1

    Games have always drove the pc market. You never needed Qemm to run windows in the 386 days, you used the it to get that little bit of extra memory to run wing commander. You need at least 611K free to launch this game was a common message and its how alot of us learned about memory management.

    They will continue to drive it. Office on a p2K is about the same speed as office on a p333. Sure it launches a little faster on the 2k but in reality it doesnt do much.

    Microsoft even recongized the drive and created the game SDK to help drive the hardware up. Now called DirectX its purpose is to give the software vendors new features to exploit in emulation so the hardware vendors will create hardware to do the same requireing more horsepower so they can sell you there next even more bloated OS.

    Yes, 1% of the market drives it for the rest of them. Ok, Perhaps Neon glowing cases are a waste of time and money, but the hardware inside is a real issue. My box boots faster then my wifes because I have faster disks, a faster bus, and faster memory. Not because I have faster cpu. Change the components and you change the machine. Thats whats important. Ok. Having a WW2 Army truck case might be a bit cool if you want to drag your machine to a show but it doesnt make the system run faster.

    There will always be a niche market for high end anything. Falcon succeeds not only because they build decent system but because of there marketing. Microsoft has survived to what it is today through there Marketing. If you market right you survive and sell. I bought 3 different copies of on of the eq expansions and each one had a Falcon ad in it. If you get just a .1% return on those cards yours still raking in the cash.

    --
    --- Always remember. 99.36% of all statistics are inaccurate.
  93. You must be kidding by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

    I think the folks at Alpina, AMG, Brabus and Lorinser will loudly disagree with your assessments.

    The companies I mentioned do more sporting modifications to BMW's and Mercedes-Benzes. They very well know that many drivers will NOT accept a vehicle with a rock-like ride and race-car fast steering; that's why the suspension designers at these companies know such design as much as the engineers at the BMW or Mercedes-Benz--sometimes more so. For example, a Brabus-modified Mercedes-Benz E-series car may have a slightly firmer ride, but the ride does not make you feel every bump on the road and handling is VASTLY improved.

  94. Excellent! by ZanshinWedge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm glad that I can get this kind of important, breaking news from slashdot, since my subscription to "Duh!" magazine ran out a few months ago.

  95. Falcon 3.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Raise your hand if you bought a math coprocessor to play Falcon 3.0 in hi-fidelty flight mode.

    Or hang your head in shame, either way...

  96. Gamers not games by Alari · · Score: 1

    It's the gamers, not the games. Games don't buy and play themselves (yet), and computers don't buy new upgrades and install them (yet) - so while technically the games encourage people to go out and do the purchasing and upgrading, it's the gamers who are actually driving the market, not the game developers or the games themselves.

    (Which should be just as much of a "Duh" as the original article, why there's a big argument about it here I'll never know =)

    Alari

    --
    I use Windows... like a two dollar wh.. why don't I just go ahead and not finish that sentence.
  97. oh bug it is for solitare by dfj225 · · Score: 1

    Oh you just gotta have the best 3d card for solitare. If solitare doesn't run at 20000000 fps it just isn't as enjoyable as it could be. Thats why I've invested the most for best card possible :-P

    --
    SIGFAULT
  98. Uh... way to go analyst by MeNTyFReSh · · Score: 1

    Wow, thats some estimate Roger Kay has there.. less the 1 percent of home comps are only with the intent of gaming... I'm wondering how he determined in the the first place that a Dell comp cant be a gaming computer.. Personally my Dell is an great gaming machine and would recommend it to anyone one.. esp since you can customize it on their website.

    --

    "Eat right, Exercise daily, Die anyways."
    http://www.10angrygamers.com Where purple monkeys attack!!

  99. hehe and I thought CNN was a NEWS channel :) by Scooter · · Score: 1

    What exactly is their point? WE KNOW THIS ALREADY

    Mind you - I reckon Microsoft put loads of delay loops in their OS's - more with every update - to get you to uprade your hardware in a secret deal with Intel. How else can you explain that with every successive release, Windows performs like a donkey with one leg less than the previous version? :P

  100. Associated Press, not CNN by One+Louder · · Score: 1

    Not to excuse CNN's lack of depth on some stories, but they're not the source of the story - AP is. You may as well be saying "Good Job SlashDot".

  101. Marketing by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

    Do you think Doom3 will be designed for a 2ghz Pentium 4? When designing a game, you want to direct it to the largest audience possible, while not sacrificing quality. The computers are far faster than the mainstream programs require.

    --
    TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
  102. Again, no duh... by Stephonovich · · Score: 1

    Job well done, CNN. Thank you for reporting such a lovely and timely report. We shall now lynch the writer. Why, oh why, must CNN and other idiot places that don't know #%@#% about computers anyway use computer terminology? GHz, DDR Memory (who at CNN even knows what DDR stands for?! Who knows what it actually means for your speed?) the list goes on. I especially like how they said GeForce 3. Excuse me, but anyone with a recent kick-butt gaming setup is going to have a GeForce 4 Ti 4600, or a Radeon 9700 Pro. Either or, peoples. IDIOTS! IDIOTS! IDIOTS! I agree with whoever it was that stated the obvious: it's the games that drives gamers. I discovered long ago it's a vicious circle. New games come out, (Doom III) we buy new computers. New computers come out, we buy them in hopes that they will run future games. Newer games come out, our computers don't run them. It's a conspiracy, I tell you. (-:Stephonovich:-)

    --
    "Who needs reincarnation when we've got parallel universes?" -Me
  103. Of course... by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

    Who else would be dumb... er, crazy... um, smart enought to pay twice as much money for the 4600 that's only 20% faster then the 4200...

    Definately noone that didnt get their parents to buy it for them anyway... :)

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
  104. call me redundant, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no shit, sherlock.

    this only furthers my opinion that journalists merely state the obvious in a manner that seems new and innovative to idiots. (and i know about these things because i just wasted the past year of my life earning a journalism degree).

  105. Why I use free software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's only for those fanatical and rich enough to indulge in keeping their systems at the cutting edge." -Kay

    I can't afford the best hardware, but I can afford the best software! :)

    Thanks OSS community!

  106. More shocking news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard that ^H^H^H joke got old several years ago!