Slashdot Mirror


Build a Macintosh From Scratch

An anonymous reader writes "MacOpz has posted a great step-by-step tutorial on building your own G4-based Macintosh from scratch. This article includes where to get parts, what modifications must be performed, and tons of photographs. A must-read for anyone that wants a Mac but doesn't want to pay Apple prices."

277 of 415 comments (clear)

  1. wow, interesing by diablo6683 · · Score: 1

    wow, i wonder what the commercial applications of this are. dek take a pic :)

    1. Re:wow, interesing by rstevens · · Score: 1

      anyone want to build one for me in exchange for kisses?

      --
      http://www.clango.org
    2. Re:wow, interesing by rstevens · · Score: 1

      i've got everything but the female part down, is that negotiable?

      --
      http://www.clango.org
  2. Price... by chrysalis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem is that when you sum up everything, you end up with something _more expensive_ than just buying it from Apple.

    Oh and of course you also have to purchase MacOS.

    --
    {{.sig}}
    1. Re:Price... by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1

      You can't use Yellowdog Linux?

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    2. Re:Price... by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Well, the article specifically says you should just but stuff off eBay. So assuming you find somebody will to sell with no reserve and start the bidding low, and misspell some common words so nobody finds the auction and runs up the price, you could have a nice cheap system. But good luck finding all the parts you need in the first place.

    3. Re:Price... by Scaebor · · Score: 1

      One of the most useful aspects of this kind of thing being posted to a place with as many readers as slashdot is that someone with some bright new innovation in the process might see it and make his idea known to others, thus bringing down the cost and difficulty factor for all.

      --
      "Hey brother Christian with your high and mighty errand / your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying"
    4. Re:Price... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

      Very true.

      This is by no means a new idea. Folks have been building macs for years, however due to the fact that you have to aquire a few used proprietary parts, prices can get quite high.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    5. Re:Price... by zaffir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um... Case: $50. Logic Board: $125-$150 CPU: $200 PSU: $70 RAM: $50 Graphics Card: $90 Drives and stuff: $100-$150 OS X: $120 That doesn't add up to more than the $1000+ G4 systems Apple is selling. Sure it isn't cheap, but it beats buying one from the Apple monopoly. Of course, the speed probably doesn't compare unless you get a nice 1ghz CPU...

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    6. Re:Price... by Istealmymusic · · Score: 1, Redundant

      This is coming from someone who calls himself foobar104?

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    7. Re:Price... by c1pher · · Score: 1

      "Um... Case: $50. Logic Board: $125-$150 CPU: $200 PSU: $70 RAM: $50 Graphics Card: $90 Drives and stuff: $100-$150 OS X: $120"

      As i was reading that, i was expecting a "...Not paying a boatload of money to Apple: PRICELESS." type of thing, at first. :-)

      --
      The Adult Happy Meal - "I'm lovin' it!"
    8. Re:Price... by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 4, Informative
      I wholeheartedly agree.
      Man oh man.
      In the old days /. just simply refused to acknowledge Macs at all so I guess that this sort of thing should be considered progress. Still no grasp of the obvious but better than the previous invisibility. Still . . .
      OK, children, gather round for today's bowl of clue.
      First of all, if you're gonna talk Apple mods, then start at applefritter. They've built Macs into everything from 1930's radios to LEGO people to ziplock bags.
      Next, (I can't believe that I'm doing this twice in one day!), let's get the vendors and refs out of the way:

      Mac of All Trades Getcher used macs here! Pretty visuals, delicious prices, detailed info. Selection could be better and there's no old stuff at all but I can deal with that. Have I bought from them yet? Nope. Am I likely to in the future? Yep.

      MacResq The best place I've found overall to pick up gear. Even the guys in that article figured that out.

      Powermax Cheesy setup, improving selection, good prices.

      Shreve Expensive, distracting, but the best place to get weird low-end stuff like Mac Plus manuals and Daystar cards.

      Small Dog Shrinking selection, great quality, excellent service, annoying interface. Bottom line, these are the guys to turn to for premium service, support, and savvy. Been around quite a while and, hey, they enclose coupons for Ben and Jerry's.

      Guide to Mac CPUsThis is Apple's own site for detailed specs on all their machines ever. I'm starting you off on the page for older machines to remind you that a well-configured 1996 Mac w/ a USB/Firewire card can run OSX just fine, thank you very much.

      Focus of Mac Hardware good workaday resource for doing mods. No cool toys. Considerable good data.

      Missoula Mac User Group, Yeah, I know that you haven't heard of them; neither has anybody else outside of Montana AFAIK. Best place for overall newbie resources.

      ResExcellence In the old days I would have suggested MacFixit, but these guys have taken their place. If you've been in the Mac world for a while you'll recognize them as the old-time source extraordinaire of ResEdit hacks.

      Think Secret The only rumor site I like that I forgot to mention yesterday.

      Okay, moving right along. CPUs. Those yahoos think that the only option is to start from scratch. Get a clue. The last pre-Jobs big boxes kicked almighty ass. Amelio may not have been a gifted businessman but he was a much better heavy gear guy. As far as I'm concerned your best bet for DIY is to buy an 8600. It'll be $230, tops. You get a great case, big power supply, floppy drive, cables, and so on. Probably also a Zip, for which I will pity you as that model of Zip just LOVED to come down with the Click o' Death. Even if you flat throw out all the electronics you're still way ahead of starting from a place like Tom's.
      Next, processor speed. When will those yahoos figure it out? Before you get obsessed with latest and greatest ask yourself, "what exactly will I be DOING with this machine?" If you're running stuff like BBEdit (ah, my one true love!) or Photoshop for still work then any 400MHz box with fast drives and plenty of RAM will be, for all intents and purposes, instantanteous. Buying anything faster just means that you're acting like the small-donged dimwits who buy $20K stereos to get fidelity five times better then they can hear.
      Drives. I'm always amazed at how terrified Windoze-damaged (let alone *nix) folks are at the thought of external drives. Get over it, already. On a Mac all that driver clash claptrap is a distant and not very credible folktale. Get a basic little 6 Gig internal and invest your money in external Firewire devices. You think this LAN party stuff is cool? On a Mac pretty much any well configured boot drive will boot any similar recent Mac. Stop carrying your entire box with you; stick to drives. Even better, get two or three smaller ones instead of one big one and, short of FBI seizures and vast fires, you become crash proof. Mac dies? Plug your drive (you did remember to back up your core data, right?) into another Mac and you're up and running again in minutes.
      The future. If you're such an almighty techie that you just *need* to build a new cooler world every year or so, then remember, Mach kernel plus gigabit ethernet equals mongo shared resources. Even if you're too lazy to set up a formal Beowolf system, it's pretty damned easy to just keep adding machines and splitting the jobs between them. Instead of buying a whole new box, maybe you should just buy a second one and start spreading load to it.
      OSes. Yup. No question, Jaguar is pretty spiffy. But almost every vendor site above (as well as eBay and co.) will sell you older legit disks and serial num.s for about fifty bucks. If you buy from a place like Small Dog you'll even be clearing out some of that famed Apple back inventory.
      That's it. You want more? Then go to my site already (though best to wait a few weeks for my next redesign). Want more then that? Then pay me and I'll think about it.
      Promising to not ever again use up time posting tutorials on /.,
      Rustin

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    9. Re:Price... by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      According to the website, the CPU is $400, not $200. Adding $200 to the above sum gives me $1080. So it is, in fact, more expensive than buying from Apple.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    10. Re:Price... by zaffir · · Score: 1

      Apple's least expensive G4 Tower is $1700. Dig it.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    11. Re:Price... by Master+Bait · · Score: 3, Informative
      Okay, moving right along. CPUs. Those yahoos think that the only option is to start from scratch. Get a clue. The last pre-Jobs big boxes kicked almighty ass. Amelio may not have been a gifted businessman but he was a much better heavy gear guy. As far as I'm concerned your best bet for DIY is to buy an 8600. It'll be $230, tops. You get a great case, big power supply, floppy drive, cables, and so on.

      It is a BIG problem that the older Macs run a 50, 45 or even a 40 mhz bus. That just doesn't carry the day for me anymore. I speak from experience because I'm running an ancient PowerCurve at 350mhz G3 with a 50 mhz (overclocked) bus. When I went from a 266mhz to a 350, I hardly noticed the difference. These machines are starved for data. My girlfriend bought a 466mhz G4 running a 133mhz bus and that makes all the difference in the world. Her machine spanks another friend's 450 G4 running a 100mhz bus.

      I agree with you about not bothering doing it from scratch. Just get a G4 running with a 133mhz bus and a G4 7410 CPU and you're set for a couple of years.

      Overall, the high price of used Apple parts and complete equipment tells us there is a much larger market demand that Apple's stupid, thumbhead, prima-dona, ignorant, ego-puffed leaders aren't able to supply. I believe they could easily take their market share up to 15% if they could get their manufacturing act together.

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    12. Re:Price... by axxackall · · Score: 1

      Because YDL is better adapted for PPC.

      --

      Less is more !
    13. Re:Price... by axxackall · · Score: 1

      Cut $120 that I don't want to pay for Mac OS X - Linux PPC is much a better choice.

      --

      Less is more !
    14. Re:Price... by foobar104 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      And this is coming from someone who calls himself "Istealmymusic?" I mean, your honesty is refreshing, but come on.

    15. Re:Price... by ameoba · · Score: 2

      Of course when you're buying new hardware with a warranty from Apple you can expect to pay a bit more than buying 'as-is' bits from somebody's burned out mac. I'm not against doing a little work, but I am against buying hardware that could very well be burned out & unwarrantied.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    16. Re:Price... by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but if all you want is a Linux box, wouldn't Intel hardware be cheaper? I've seen OS-less 900mhz Durons advertised for like $400 Canadian, which is like a buck twenty five US. (Well, actually, more like $240. but you get the drift)

      On the other hand, I wonder how hard it would be to build up a used first gen Power Mac into a G4, for a cheapo OSX box? Though I'd probably still wind up throwing Linux on it, too...

      --
      Click here if you just like to click on shit.
    17. Re:Price... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Some humility would be refreshing.

      From me? Dude, you obviously have no idea who you're talking to, here.

      There is a growing number of people who think that you can't "steal" music...

      Yeah, and there are a growing number of people who think that Elvis is alive, too. These people are called "fucking idiots."

      If somebody offers to sell you something, and then you take it from them without paying for it, you're stealing. I don't care if it's music or software or furniture or hugs or bunny rabbits or laughter. Stealing is stealing, and fucking idiots are fucking idiots, and that's the way the world is.

    18. Re:Price... by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Which is a dual processor.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    19. Re:Price... by Campioni · · Score: 1

      If somebody offers to sell you something, and then you take it from them without paying for it, you're stealing. I don't care if it's music or software or furniture or hugs or bunny rabbits or laughter. Stealing is stealing, and fucking idiots are fucking idiots, and that's the way the world is.


      So if you download a Linux Distribution from an official server you obviously steal it. Your local bookshop sells it, but you just take it for free.

    20. Re:Price... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      See what I mean about fucking idiots? Don't try to obfuscate the situation by deliberately misinterpreting the facts. Capitol Records makes and publishes a CD. You can buy that CD for $12 (or whatever). But rather than buying it for $12 (or whatever), you come home and download it from some teenager who got a copy of it from a friend who got a copy of it from....

      You have stolen. You have committed the crime of theft, just as surely as if you walked out of the Try-n-Save with the CD hidden under your shirt. There is no argument about this, and people who say things like "you can't steal music because it costs nothing to copy it" are clearly deluding themselves.

    21. Re:Price... by Golias · · Score: 1
      By your logic, if I download a photograph of the Mona Lisa from somebody that had a camera when they saw it, I have just robbed the Louvre of one of the most valuable paintings in the world!

      After all, I am looking at a copy of the painting without going to France. Theft is theft.

      Sorry, but you are also a fucking idiot (or a troll... hard to be sure these days). Distributing copies of somebody else's content is not theft. It's copyright infringement.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    22. Re:Price... by Golias · · Score: 1
      Dude, instead of writing that whole screed and posting all those links, couldn't you just post a linke to Low End Mac, which has all of those links and more? (Okay, they don't link to your home page, but whatever.)

      The also have lots of the exact same informaiton your are rattling off, along with lots of Mac specs, etc.

      Then again, I imagine that nearly everybody reading this thread already knows about them, as well as most of the sites you mentioned.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    23. Re:Price... by Bodhammer · · Score: 1

      Well, there is the Jihad about pudding vs. Jello...

      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    24. Re:Price... by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 2
      Small Dog [smalldog.com] Shrinking selection, great quality, excellent service, annoying interface. Bottom line, these are the guys to turn to for premium service, support, and savvy. Been around quite a while and, hey, they enclose coupons for Ben and Jerry's.

      And they give you little plastic dogs!

      Smalldog is excellent, I bought my G4 from them, (it was a refurb) and a bunch of other stuff over the years.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    25. Re:Price... by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Calling an argument "semantics" is just a pejorative way of admitting that words have meanings. Governments needed to pass new laws against copyright infringement precisely because it isn't theft--if it were depriving anyone of their property, it would have been forbidden ever since our civilization adopted the rule of law.

      Our society holds that private property is an inalienable right, but copyright is merely a new pragmatic bargain with creators. If you're going to rave about moral obligations, ask yourself whether society is still being well served by the variety of restrictions we are allowing creators to impose on us all, because whatever we're expecting in exchange is the only thing that makes copyright infringement immoral.

    26. Re:Price... by Enahs · · Score: 2

      I just snagged a CPU for $99. So bleah. :-P

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
    27. Re:Price... by el+stevo · · Score: 1

      one of the best macs i ever owned was a powermac 7600 that i hot-rodded to present-day specs (well, "present day" meaning last september and "specs" meaning those of a low-end G4 at the time).

      let's see, it's got...
      NewerTech G4/400 card ($280-something: i've got a friend who's an authorized reseller)
      288 megs of RAM (free: scavenged)
      Voodoo5 5500 PCI ($329! fer christ's sake! that was the most expensive part of the machine!)
      Adaptec 39160 SCSI card (free: scavenged! would you believe someone threw this great card out?!)
      macally combo USB & FireWire PCI-Bridge (like, $149... i think?)
      Seagate Barracuda 15somethingsomethingsomethingN 4.3GB scsi drive (something like ten bucks on ebay)
      Quantum Fireball 6gig SCSI drive - don't know which one (scavenged)
      Two Apple MultiScan 15" displays (got the pair of them for $20 at a church tag sale)
      Kensington TurboMouse 5.0 (five bucks from the "misc." bin at a local computer shop)

      i gave it a nice coat of flat-black spray paint to make it all stealth and whatnot. i had it all set-up with two monitors... damn that machine was cool. people were amazed by the mouse moving (jumping!) from screen to screen. i even fooled around with yellowdog and linuxppc for a while. my little old powermac could hold it's own against the newer machines of the day (mostly because of the graphics card and the NewerTech card). sadly, just a few weeks ago i retired it for a blue-and-white g3... my next project!

      --
      i'm sorry, i'm just sleep deprived... but bitter. yes. very bitter.
    28. Re:Price... by Golias · · Score: 1
      Just because the name is different doesn't mean it's not illegal.

      Oh. Okay, I'm totally sorry I said it's not illegal, because... hey, wait a minute! I never said that, did I? Let's go read it again... (mumbles while reading)... nope, never said it. Maybe you should read a little more carefully before you go on your little tirade.

      Call it what you like, but downloading/sharing music is, in the same way that making copies of movies you rent is, theft.

      No, that would be calling it what you like. It is not theft. Theft is taking something away from somebody. Copyright infringement is making unauthroized duplicates of somebody else's data. There is no relationship between the two.

      You can make up names for it all day

      Nobody is "making up names" here. Copyright infringement is what US Law calls it.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  3. If only apple would support this. by DBordello · · Score: 1

    I feel that many more people would use OSX if they could experiment with it without buying expensive hardware. Building your own mac is a step in the right direction, perhaps an open architecure. I know I would love to try OS X, as I feel it is far superior to windows from what I have seen. But I will never pay the $$ needed to try it. Oh well, I guess KDE will do.

    1. Re:If only apple would support this. by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      There is an open architecture for the PPC, that IBM layed out, and that many companies have used. (Including such a name as Amiga)

      The problem is that these are likely not supported by OSX, or OS9.

      *shrug* It'd still be nice if the geeks of the world could build their own system, I for one don't need to pay a premium on the RAM or HD for my apple system, but when the top end PowerMac comes with a 80GB min. HD size, and 512 MB min RAM?

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    2. Re:If only apple would support this. by LiquidPC · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you really want to try out OSX, you could just go to ebay and buy a Mac 8500, or something like that, then buy some extra ram and a faster processor card. I managed to get all of this for less than $100.

      Then just buy OSX and use XPostFacto, which allows you to run OSX on unsupported macs. Now you have a Mac that allows you to fiddle with OSX for under $150.

    3. Re:If only apple would support this. by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

      Of course the really low budget approach would be to get an LC and run MKLinux. Perhaps go upscale and get a 6100.
      I have heard tell of MK gotten running on SE30s and I've seen it on later IIcis so clearly one could build a dual-boot MacOS/*nix box for about $50 if one really had nothing better to do or a truly tiny budget.
      Imagine that. Setting up a school in, say, Ghana, with 200 (yep, two HUNDRED!!!!!) running computers for the cost three mid-range G4s with toys(shipping not included). I can only hope.
      Rustin

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    4. Re:If only apple would support this. by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Of course the really low budget approach would be to get an LC and run MKLinux. Perhaps go upscale and get a 6100. I have heard tell of MK gotten running on SE30s and I've seen it on later IIcis so clearly one could build a dual-boot MacOS/*nix box for about $50 if one really had nothing better to do or a truly tiny budget.

      I've had both Debian and NetBSD running on my Quadra 610. They work in command-line mode, but they're sluggish as hell. I don't remember Linux being that slow on 486 systems...then again, the bus speed on a 68040 is half of the processor speed (vs. full speed for a 486DX).

      (No, neither memory nor disk should be a bottleneck...I've maxed out the RAM at 68 megs and have a 1GB 5400-rpm hard drive installed. There is no L2 cache installed...nothing used has shown up and new cache modules cost >2x what I paid for the machine. I suspect L2 cache would speed it up considerably, but I can't justify the expense.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  4. Because we all know by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

    If you add up the costs listed, it ends up cheaper than pre-built boxes from apple...

    Really.. I swear..

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
  5. This is from a thread on Arstechnica... by juuri · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  6. Commercial application of this? by elite+lamer · · Score: 1

    So couldn't a computer manufacturing company, who has these parts for ultracheap, start making Macs and selling them? Or possibly making Macs that run Linux, Windows, BeOS, whatever...

    --
    Oops!
    1. Re:Commercial application of this? by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Sure. I'd bet Steve Jobs would love to see this in the marketplace, being the calm rational guy that he is. He wouldn't do anything like publicly yell at a small company selling watches with the Mac logo on them or anything for no good reason.

    2. Re:Commercial application of this? by Simba · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure. And then they could find out first hand exactly how brutal Apple legal can be with stupid people.

      What a kludge. If you want a Mac, get a real one. Yeesh.

      --
      Hippies smell.
    3. Re:Commercial application of this? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      So couldn't a computer manufacturing company, who has these parts for ultracheap, start making Macs and selling them?

      Like the clones that threatened to put Apple out of the business, hence Steve giving them the axe? If you thouhgt the Apple reation to the eMachine rip off was violent, the reaction to unlicenced clones would be horrific.

      Or possibly making Macs that run Linux, Windows, BeOS, whatever... For all the systems you listed, macs do that all ready. The only catch is that to do windows, you need VPC, everything else has a native version though. And if it had native windows support, what would be the point of owning a mac?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  7. How To Make An Apple by RomSteady · · Score: 4, Funny
    Get required components: fertile ground, apple seed, water, fertilizer

    Plant apple seed in ground.
    Add water and fertilizer at regular intervals.
    Remove weeds at regular intervals.

    Eventually, you'll have an Apple.

    --
    RomSteady - I came, I saw, I tested. GamerTag: RomSteady / http://www.romsteady.net
    1. Re:How To Make An Apple by BESTouff · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      No way ! These days, vegetables are like software: the mainstream ones are proprietary, owned by big firms (Monsanto, etc.) and you don't have the right nor the possibility to grow them. Yes, they are patented, copyrighted etc. Yes, there are anti-piracy measures inside to prevent them to be "pirated" (i.e. naturally reproduced).

    2. Re:How To Make An Apple by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2, Funny
      Obligatory Sagan quote... well two if you count my sig

      "In order to make apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe."

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    3. Re:How To Make An Apple by kzinti · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      These days, vegetables are like software

      Does that make Johnny Appleseed the first free software advocate?

      --Jim

    4. Re:How To Make An Apple by *xpenguin* · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      How is this offtopic?

    5. Re:How To Make An Apple by avendasora · · Score: 1

      Um, growing an apple tree from a seed will, almost without exception, produce a fruit that is totaly inedible.

      All commercial apples for human consumption are splices (clones) from the 1 original tree (for each "variety").

      All those Red Delicious apples? Grown from the same tree, or clones there of.

    6. Re:How To Make An Apple by Saeger · · Score: 1
      There are no anti-piracy measures to prevent physical objects from being "pirated".

      <fun futurist hat>
      One day in the not too distant future everyone will have a "magic box" in their kitchen with utility pipes feeding in recycled raw molecular feedstock + energy to cheaply reproduce any object you want (as long as it passes your safety filters, defined by some democratically approved intelligent heuristic vs using totalitarian whitelists or blacklists - so no nukes for you (and if you try hacking your own box - it's too late - as everything is infested with a protective network which serves as an active shield against harm (e.g. uranium concentration detection & immunity against bio/chem agents getting in your body))).

      You'll only need to grow that opensource apple once, then scan it molecule-by-molecule, so everyone benefits from the blueprint... and nobody starves because of this "IP theft" (that was a joke... I think)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    7. Re:How To Make An Apple by innerlimit · · Score: 1

      sad but true... they actually patented the changes made to the genome of certain crops.

      in essence they're making mutated food.
      really disgusts me.

      reminds me of 'This Other Eden' by Ben Elton, the whole world eats gm-food and everything tastes the same. when the main character sees a 'real' potato it looks disgusting but tastes great, and the carrots look like a willie great food joke) ....
      but it all tastes sooooo good!

    8. Re:How To Make An Apple by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

      So, how does it feel to wear (Diamond Age)Mr. Stephenson's hat?
      Go ahead and flame me. I know that there are lots of folk working on nanotech. I just couldn't resist.

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    9. Re:How To Make An Apple by DoctorFrog · · Score: 2

      Then I must have imagined all those apples I ate from the grown-from-seed trees in my backyard while I was growing up.

    10. Re:How To Make An Apple by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Flame you? For what? For pointing out that nanotech has been written about for decades in fiction and nonfiction, and that you assumed I was either ignorant of it or was pretending to be original because I failed to cite sources?

      Congratulations on reading Diamond Age oh learned one ( --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  8. EULA violation by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is a violation of the EULA for Mac OS to run it on any non-Apple-branded hardware. This goes for things like MOL too.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    1. Re:EULA violation by evilviper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because it is in the EULA does not mean it legally enforceable. I would suggest everyone talk to their lawyers before doing so.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:EULA violation by forged · · Score: 2

      Slashdot readers will probably want to run Linux on their G4's anyway. So here you go ---> GPL :)

    3. Re:EULA violation by Durindana · · Score: 1

      It sure is - but everything in this project is castoff Apple original equipment. This doesn't violate any EULAs.

      Though you may be right about MOL on, say, Amiga PPC harware, especially now that OS X works.

    4. Re:EULA violation by evilviper · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't say that. Certainly they won't be responsible for any issues occuring with the hardware, but I doubt that they can just deny you software support just because you didn't buy the software with their recomended hardware.

      Again, consult your llama.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:EULA violation by GauteL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes. Apart from the USA after the DMCA, I do not know about other countries where EULAs are enforcable.

      They certainly are not in Norway. If you buy a copy of MacOS X you can do whatever you want with it as long as you do not distribute it. This is also how it should be. After buying a product it just opposes all common sense of right and wrong to not be able to use the product as you see fit. Wether that is destroying it publically, running it on your elite G4-based toaster or just putting it in the refrigerator.

    6. Re:EULA violation by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Even if you roll your own Mac, it's still more expensive, slower, and has fewer options to upgrade the system. If you're not going to run MacOS, there's no reason to use Mac hardware.

    7. Re:EULA violation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Technicly, you have to use an Apple Branded MoBo. The thing they are worried most about probably are the ROMs, but since it is a real apple board, they are real Apple ROMs on there.

    8. Re:EULA violation by reallocate · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      And the lawyers will surely tell you that Apple has been successfully suing clone vendors since the Apple II days. It isn't an Apple unless it runs Apple's boot code. If you market anything that uses that code or anything derived from it, they will sue you and win.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    9. Re:EULA violation by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      ...has fewer options to upgrade the system
      Yup, it sucks not having access to that other 5% of options that PC owners have.

      So, other than CPUs, what am I missing again?

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    10. Re:EULA violation by forii · · Score: 1

      the clone vendors got sued because they had copied the ROM from apple. that's all.

    11. Re:EULA violation by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      And who is talking about selling anything?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    12. Re:EULA violation by SageLikeFool · · Score: 2, Funny
      I would suggest everyone talk to their lawyers before doing so.

      Well, so much for saving money...

    13. Re:EULA violation by oh · · Score: 1

      Companies can and do refuse support if you are not running on "supported hardware". The first thing they will ask when they find out is "and you aren't having this problem on supported hardware?"

      Its standard industry practice. The vendor will warrant that the product works on specific hardware. In one case with a DLT tape stacker I was working on I had to build a NT server and run Arcserv up on it to prove that the library was at fault, and not the program I was trying to write to it with. When it dies with arcserv, then and only then would they come out and try and fix it.

      This sucked from my point of view, but I think they were justified. When the unit was returned, I plugged it into my non-NT system and tried to run a 100Gb backup, only to have the unit fail again in the exactly the same way. After 3 more service calls, they took it back and tested it with the "supported" software.

      A timing error in the software I was using produced exactly the same failure as the original alignment fault. I stood there with the technician, and we could not work out when they fixed the original fault. It could have been after the first visit, or it could have been on the fourth.

      I know people will say that this isn't relevant to this discussion, but it highlights a point. When, say Red Hat says that they will support Linux on Brand X, they know that they have tested it on this hardware, and are confident that the manufacture won't change anything that will break it. You might believe that your hardware is standard compliant, but are you sure that you haven't made a mistake? Just a little one, a small fault that wouldn't show up straight away, but might crash the system every so often?

      --
      Democracy isn't about no one telling you what to do. It's about everyone telling you what to do.
    14. Re:EULA violation by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Easy: More than 3 PCI slots.

    15. Re:EULA violation by reallocate · · Score: 2

      The folks posting here asking about the commercial possibilities.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    16. Re:EULA violation by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Easy: More than 3 PCI slots.
      You got me there. I can see where I might lose one of the slots to a scsi card, but other than audio processor engines what would I need the other slots for?

      Bear in mind that I'll already have dual-monitor support with the single video card in the AGP slot, plus USB and Firewire ports on the MB.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    17. Re:EULA violation by reallocate · · Score: 2

      I bought a Mac several weeks ago. It came with a short period of free telephone support. I wanted more, so I bought an AppleCare package. In both cases, Apple's service is explicitly tied to the hardware I purchased: Call Apple support and the first thing they ask for is my machine's serial number. How do they get the serial number? From the store that sold you the Mac and from you, when you register online.

      No serial number, no support.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    18. Re:EULA violation by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      It is a violation of the EULA for Mac OS to run it on any non-Apple-branded hardware.

      That was the topic in the original post of the thread, which is basically talking about running it on foreign hardware. Hardware that you build yourself (the subject at hand) is different from hardware that you build to resell.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    19. Re:EULA violation by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      My computer:

      NIC, SCSI, TV tuner, sound card, Newq Drive pass through, video card (AGP, I admit).

      Granted, some of these things could be built in, but do you want to upgrade your computer every time some new standard comes out (FireWire, Airport/WiFi, USB2.0, ATA133, Serial ATA, and so on)? Or if you already have the necessary cards, what sense is there in buying a more expensive integrated mobo? You and Apple may deem that the average customer doesn't need more than three, but I only care about what I need, and what I might need soon enough.

    20. Re:EULA violation by evilviper · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is indeed standard industry practice, but that in no way makes it nessecarily vaild and legal.

      Do you think gas stations could get away saying: "This gas is certified to work only in Ford cars. We are not responsible if your non-Ford car blows-up."?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    21. Re:EULA violation by blitziod · · Score: 1

      well you could make "refurbished" apple's...using an old case or something..then fixing it by adding new parts and OS.

      --
      The only way to bust a doper--is when you yourself become a smoker!
    22. Re:EULA violation by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      No, but several gas stations (in Florida and California, at least), have large stickers on every pump saying that their gas is for motor vehicles only. Sure you can dispense it into a container and use it for various other things (lawnmower, cleaning your garage floor, melting styrofoam cups), but you can't go back to them if you set your garage on fire because you were spashing it around trying to get that paint off the concrete.

      --
      Evan (no reference)

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    23. Re:EULA violation by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      It is a violation of the EULA for Mac OS to run it on any non-Apple-branded hardware.

      I'm guessing you didn't read the article. Note that the motherboard and processor in this example are Apple parts. So far there's no EULA violation.

      However, a strict (stupid) interperetation might suggest that you must use your original Apple case as well... although the OS doesn't really "run" on the case, so that argument is out. However, maybe Apple will try to make an argument that you have to run MacOS on your Mac's included hard drive (as they are usually re-branded by/for Apple). I'd guess that would set Mac-zealots into a fury.

    24. Re:EULA violation by Bartab · · Score: 2

      And whats to stop these people from selling G4-equivalent machines with Linux pre-installed, and oh yeah it runs MacOS too While OS9 and previous required very specific boot roms, OSX does not. Of course, that doesn't stop OSX2 from requiring them again.

      MacOS of course has no protections against copying and Apple has turned a blind eye to blatent pirating of the OS (but not the hardware) for years.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
    25. Re:EULA violation by Enahs · · Score: 2
      On a much lower level than you, I once called HP with problems with a li'l DeskJet. I told the screenreader on the other end, "Now, I don't think it's an OS or driver issue because it happens under Windows and Linux." The screenreader then informed me that I may have voided my warranty. How? Unsupported OS.

      They did warranty work anyway, but it worried me.

      --
      Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
    26. Re:EULA violation by evilviper · · Score: 2

      And? The gas station isn't responsible for you doing something stupid, but they are still responsible for their gasoline actually working like gasoline. If you pour it in your lawnmower and say that it turns out the gas was only water, they can't say "well you put it in something other than an automobile so you can't sue us." Well, they can say that, but it doesn't make it true.

      If McDonalds put a "Not For Human Consumption" on their food, would it absolve them of all responsibility if someone dies of salmonella? or CatFish-monella? If anything, it's just an attempt to deter people from seeking lawyers in the first place.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    27. Re:EULA violation by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Nah - I'd imagine that you can still sue them just as easily if you did something stupid like spill gasoline in your lap and set it on fire. You might even win. :/

      I was just pointing out that the disclaimer is there (the post I was replying to said that there was no disclaimer for gasoline), not that it has any use or basis in reality. I'm still amused that the bottle of soy sauce that I bought has a stern warning: "Intellectual Property Rights Reserved". People who do labeling are amusing - look around at labels, disclaimers and warnings, and try to figure out what the heck they were thinking of.

      I want to get a tatto of a EULA absolving me of all legal responsibility. If you interact with me, all reprocussions of any of my actions are yours to deal with. Heh.

      (And just in case you don't catch humor, no, I'm not serious. Nor did I think the gas station's warnings had any legal standing either).

      --
      Evan (no references)

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    28. Re:EULA violation by TwitchCHNO · · Score: 1

      True - However since the article suggests you use an apple motherboard w/ a Mac OS boot rom the EULA is not violated.

      The boot rom was originally manufactured by Apple and is required to run the Macintosh operating system - Classic or X.

      If you were to manufacture your OWN motorola based motherboards & copied Mac boot roms - then you would get into legal entanglements much more serious than an EULA

      Then again IAMNAL

      --
      ___________________________
      I'm not a geek, but I play one on TV.
    29. Re:EULA violation by ce25254 · · Score: 1

      Common sense does not make right and wrong! :-)

    30. Re:EULA violation by bhawbaker · · Score: 1

      com'on folks.. repeat with me: There - Are - No - Apple - ROMs. That's right, there are no apple rom anymore, and been like that for several years.. face it, apple no longer uses rom on the motherboards.

    31. Re:EULA violation by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      you are correct sir! All of Apple's recently released machines use a software rom file installed by the OS

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    32. Re:EULA violation by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      There are no Mac boot roms, at least not on the hardware. None. At all.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    33. Re:EULA violation by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      No, I mentioned FireWire/USB2.0 because older computers and many new motherboards don't come with a controller built in. So, you buy a PCI controller for cheap rather than replacing your motherboard. My computer works just fine as it is. I'd rather buy a $15 card than a $2000 computer every time Apple registers a new trademark.

      All these built in systems add to the cost of a new system as well. If I have perfectly good cards from an old system, I don't need to pay for them again.

    34. Re:EULA violation by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      Part of the reason for this is for tracking issues.

      each serial number is unique. Out of warranty stuff will be helped with but, you have to pay for it out of pocket.

    35. Re:EULA violation by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It probably is semi-legal. The software is sold to run on Apple hardware. If you get bugs because you are not using Apple software, then it is not unreasonable to assume that it is your harware to blame.

      If you could prove that the problem was in their software, then they may be obliged to give some level of support, at least as far as it is a fault. There may well be no legal requirement for Apple to offer any support at all if the software is not actually faulty.

      The petrol situation is similar. If the petrol makes your car explode because it is not a Ford, then it is your fault. This isn't going to happen though. The petrol would also have made a Ford explode, so the manufacturer is responsible.

  9. Re:No offense... by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1

    because lots of people (like me) prefer to use a mac after we discovered how great they actually run

    it's not our fault that the only provider of hardware to run the OS charges really high prices

  10. Why? by Sgt_Bush · · Score: 2, Funny

    Paying to build a Mac from scratch? That's like buying parts and building a Fiat.

    1. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny
      Paying to build a Mac from scratch? That's like buying parts and building a Fiat.

      I hate to have to be the one to break this news to you, but if you're buying a fiat, parts are all you're getting.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Why? by mumkin · · Score: 2

      Isn't that what most Fiat owners do? I mean, a few years after you've bought it you discover that you've replaced enough parts and it's spent so much time in the shop that you have essentially built your own Fiat :-)

    3. Re:Why? by snake_dad · · Score: 2

      You do know that Ferrari is owned by Fiat, don't you? :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  11. Re:No offense... by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2

    How does one build a Windows computer, and do you need to pay Microsoft even if you install Linux on it?

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  12. Fun to read, but impractical by marcsiry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a professional who relies on my Macintosh to generate income, the supposed "price premium" of Apple hardware over a build-it-yourself amounts to a half day's billing.

    Add the time to build eating into billable hours, and it would come out as an expensive proposition.

    There are lots of reasons to build a machine yourself- better control over the parts, getting a custom config that you can't easily buy, and saving money. I wager that most people's reason to buy a Mac- it works, out of the box, to make us money- is not really compatible with those ideals.

    I do agree with one sentiment addressed in the story, and that's avoiding the outlandish prices Apple charges for standard parts such as RAM and hard disks. Most savvy Mac users buy base configs and then load up the RAM and HD's via cheaper, third party suppliers.

    --
    Marc Siry || interactive media professional, motorcycle enthusiast ||
    1. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by norton_I · · Score: 2

      Yes, but for a home "computer enthusiatst" who has a PC, and thinks this new OSX thing looks pretty cool, the prices apple charges are outlandish. I just put together a sweet Athlon MP based system for about $1600. I looked at what a G4 that I would consider and "acceptable substitute" would be and it costs about $2700, plus about $300 to get a nice monitor and replace the keyboard and mouse. Plus, that is with me being very generous about an equivelent machine. There is no way that a 1GHz G4 competes with an Athlon MP 2000, and most of the other components are comparable.

      Now, I primarily got the machine to play Windows only games, so Apple wasn't even in the running, but if it had been a general purpose computer upgrade, I might have considered the Mac, if it only had a $100-$200 price premium. But $1400 is way too much.

      So this would be interesting to me, except that it turned out to be "scavenge parts to make an older generation Mac for cheap" rather than making a machine equivelent to what Apple sells now, just with a price comprable to a home-built PC, or even a Dell.

    2. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by digitalsushi · · Score: 2
      Add the time to build eating into billable hours, and it would come out as an expensive proposition.


      Ah but one hand washes the other! ..or some other meaningless idiom- the person with billable hours can purchase a real mac, whereas the person with no billable hours must make the cheap version himself. Quid pro quo, semper fi, one hand washes the other, wheaties, the breakfast of champions.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    3. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by bcrowell · · Score: 2
      The price difference started out as a silly urban folktale, but it actually makes more sense now. People used to compare Mac and PC prices back when low-end PCs came with crappy video cards, no sound I/O, 1/4 the memory, etc. The comparison was silly, but it became enshrined in legend.

      These days there's at least some truth to it. I can get a no-OS Intel box for $300 at Fry's and put Linux on it for free. (That's the system I'm posting on.) There isn't any Mac that's that cheap. My Linux box is about comparable to an iMac, which you can't get for less than about $900. (This is all assuming you already have a monitor you can reuse.)

    4. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Troll

      Couple notes on your comment. I'm not specificaly sure about the Athon MPs but if it's anything like my XP 20000 the G4 is definately competative. At least from my experience. Granted the PC was cheaper, but it also feels cheaper.

      Secondly, you can plug any monitor into the mac, as they all come with a DVI - VGA adapter. SO there's no need to pay for a new monitor, unless you don't have one, in which case you would be buying one anyway. The keyboards that come with macs are fine, I wouldn't bother replacing it. As for the mouse, well, yeah I suppose you would want to replace that, but honestly, you can live on one button.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    5. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Troll

      even the base configs are terrifically expensive, more than double and nearly triple good, well-known brands PC parts

      I suggest you check into prices again

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    6. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if your a troll or a clown

      Either way, that was fucking funny

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    7. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by norton_I · · Score: 2

      The Atlhon MP 2000 is the same as the Athlon XP 2000. My impression, based on talking to several Mac users, and some small experience using them myself was that the Athlon was definately faster than the G4 (in real world use, if not in photoshop benchmarks), but not enough that it would be a big problem. I have also heard (though not used any dual G4s) that the bus is a shared SDR bus, rather than a point-to-point DDR bus, which makes the G4 really bandwidth starved in a dual processor configuration. I don't know if that applies to the new G4s that use DDR memory or not.

      The price I quoted for the PC included a monitor, which is why I added that on to the Apple price. The mouse definately needs to be replaced, the whole design pisses me off, not just the lack of buttons 2 and 3. The keyboard I could live with, but it isn't really ideal.

      Still, the G4 is way out of the price range I would consider acceptable competition for a PC. Now, if I were using it for work, where the Mac had a substantial advantage over a PC for me, I wouldn't hesitate to pay the extra $1200, but as a home user, it costs way too much.

    8. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Ok, I see where you're comming from. Well, now you can add this one to your list of impressions of the Athlon XP computers. They work, they play games nice, but they bug out when opening many apps, or when you have multiple apps open and you want to add another. Definately not a great improvement over a mac, unless you're buying for games.

      As for the price, if you really want a mac, but don't like paying premiums, you should buy their laptops. The laptops are very competative in pricing and really make nice computers. And the battery life is really good.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    9. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I don't run apache so I couldn't tell you

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    10. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by 1in10 · · Score: 1

      Translation: I'm rich, I can afford to pay the prices that Apple charges, the peasants don't deserve a Mac.

    11. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

      Dead on. If I could, I would buy the motherboard and processors from Apple. Everything else I can get cheaper somewhere else, and put it together in an hour or so.

      ~LoudMusic

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    12. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by iCEBaLM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, now you can add this one to your list of impressions of the Athlon XP computers. They work, they play games nice, but they bug out when opening many apps, or when you have multiple apps open and you want to add another. Definately not a great improvement over a mac, unless you're buying for games.

      Uhh, *what*?! I have an AMD Athlon XP 1800+ machine. I am currently running XP on it and have mirc, mozilla, winamp and outlook open. I just "added another" by opening kali and it loaded in 2 seconds. Opening Word after that loaded in an impressive 1.5 seconds.

      What is your definition of "bug out" exactly?

      -- iCEBaLM

    13. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      When I have 8 IE windows open (often do), WinAmp, AIM, KDX Server, KDX Client,Proximatron (web crap filter), open office open and then when I go to open Outlook, the computer stops responding for about 15 seconds.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    14. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I meant like take a visit to gateway or compaq or some other vendor and try to get an exactly compareable computer. That includes software and nice features like gigabit ethernet

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    15. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by scd · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should learn a bit about processors before you state such assertions. It is the OS (Windows) that is responsible for the scheduling of applications. It is presumably sending the same series of instructions to an Athlon as it would a Pentium (save for certain instances where it might use specially optimized instructions).

      In short, your gripe should be with Windows or with other hardware issues (lack of RAM?) than the processor.

    16. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      And how much RAM do you have on this machine?

      -- iCEBaLM

    17. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by TheOldFart · · Score: 1

      >> Most savvy Mac users ... is that like military intelligence?

    18. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      512 RAM, doubtful that it's a lack of memory.

      Regardless of wether or not windows is responsible for the sending of instructions, it is the processor that is resposible for the execution. When I am told that this processor is supposed to be worlds faster than my mac, I expect it to be worlds faster, not just slightly so (if at all). If the machine can't handle what I throw at it, why do I want the machine? And no, I won't put linux on it. Linux is not reliable enough or clean enough for me to want to use as my primary OS. Maybe it's because I've been spoiled by OS X, but that's the way it is.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    19. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      512 MB DDR. I may not use PCs as my primary computer, but I'm not stupid either. Unless you somehow want to try to convince me that 512 is not enough memory.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    20. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I can't figure out what the hell you just said. As near as I can figure, you just compared the price of a mac with that of a barebones PC? Of course the mac is more expensive.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    21. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by JamieF · · Score: 2

      >I can get a no-OS Intel box for $300 at Fry's and put Linux on it
      >for free. [...] There isn't any Mac that's that cheap.

      Have you heard of eBay? There are older iMacs on there for $300-$600. True, there isn't any *new* Mac that costs $300, but that's not what you said. If you want a Mac and you have $300 you can get one. The true question is, would you want a $300 Mac?

      >My Linux box is about comparable to an iMac,
      >which you can't get for less than about $900.

      Which iMac? The new one? Does your Linux box have that built-in LCD thingy? OK, so maybe you don't want to pay for that, but to make a fair price comparison, compare your PC to a similarly configured Mac, not the lowest-end brand new one.

      I'd be interested to see the configuration of your $300 Linux box... are you including RAM, HD, keyboard, mouse, modem, ethernet card, CD-RW, nice video card, firewire interface, and a year warranty? An iMac comes with all of that.

      >This is all assuming you already have a monitor you can reuse.

      Again, not a valid comparison... if you are pricing a PC without a monitor and an iMac which has an integrated monitor, the iMac is going to cost a couple hundred bucks more because you're getting more.

      It sounds like maybe you're complaining about bundling (you have a monitor and don't want to pay for an LCD or swivel arm or wireless or a new KB/mouse or firewire etc.). Fair enough; I own a G4 and I don't want an iMac either (at least until they come with 1600x1200 displays). Like I said, consider used Macs for a fair comparison, or add a bunch of peripherals to your PC to give it the same features that the iMac has.

    22. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

      Linux is not reliable enough or clean enough for me to want to use as my primary OS. Maybe it's because I've been spoiled by OS X, but that's the way it is.

      Now I know you're a troll, nice one. :)

      -- iCEBaLM

    23. Re:Fun to read, but impractical by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      What about sound?
      What about cache?
      What speed was the drive, did you make sure they matched?
      Again, did you match the speed on the DVDROM/CD-RW drive. I've seen cheap drives availible, but not in the speeds apple offered.
      After you've added your sound, your gigabit ethernet, your and your modem (and maybe the USB 2 might take a port, how many open and useable PCI slots are left?
      Why would I want firewire? iPod for one, and the fact that honestly, I don't see a whole lot of USB 2 drives and devices out there.

      I have yet to find good equivilents to iTunes or iMovie availible free for the PC. And then there's OS X, which in itself is worth paying some money for. Not to mention, you still need to pay for XP on your windows box.

      And I was initialy refering to finding one of these machines from a name brand vendor. The prices are very comparable. Of course you can build one yourself for cheaper, I'm not arguing with that, but face it, most people don't want to do that.

      Yes geeks and people who look can get better deals on PCs, and I can get better deals on macs (i.e. I can get the top of the line TiBook for $3,000 instead of $3,800), but for a consumer who buys from a vendor, macs and PCs are fairly competative for the same features.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  13. Re:Pretty cool, but its not my box of springs by Scaebor · · Score: 1

    How to build a PC:
    1)Buy your stuff
    2)Take your stuff out of the box
    3)Plug in connectors where they fit
    4)Turn on your new computer!

    --
    "Hey brother Christian with your high and mighty errand / your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying"
  14. Reminds me of that old saying... by Pay+The+Fuck+Up! · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Open Source is free if your time is worth nothing."

    Glad to see someone is extending this brilliant principle to the Mac world.

    1. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by bp33 · · Score: 1

      My thinking as well. Last spring I did the research on a new PC, building from scratch vs. buying retail. I figured (after about a day of research) that I could save $200 if I built it myself .. assuming my time was worth nothing. I bought retail.

      Who actually originated that saying? I've found it on a bunch of web sites, attributed to different people, but can't find the definitive quote or author.

    2. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by mjpaci · · Score: 2

      I did the same analysis and came to the same conclusion. However, since I had never actually put together a PC since I assembled a bunch of Apple ][+'s for Villa Victoria Academy in 1985, I decided to put it together myself. I've had no problems with is and now that it would be out of warranty anyway, I have no point. Thank you for listening.

      Really, it's a PC just for the sake of tinkering and THAT is why I decided to build it. If I were buying for my company, I'd go with Dell or Compaq.

      --Mike

    3. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think *I* was the first person to say that, a few years ago here. But since there's not a "search" at Slashdot (that would definately break MySQL), I can't find the post.

    4. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by bp33 · · Score: 1

      > since there's not a "search" at Slashdot

      You must be using an alternate universe version of Slashdot. I use the search box (at the bottom of the screen) all the time.

    5. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 2
      Actually, I think *I* was the first person to say that, a few years ago here.
      Ha! No sir, it was JWZ, and he said it before Slashdot's UIDs were anywhere near your 235196.
    6. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by vsync64 · · Score: 1
      Price and time aren't the only consideration. When you build it yourself, you get the option of picking all the parts that go into the system -- and don't give me that Office-Depot-configure-to-order-custom-system crap; I used to be forced to sell those heaps -- from the brand of hard drive to the exact chipset on the motherboard. This does a lot in terms of optimizing for the performance you need and eliminating problems later.

      And on the quote, AFAIK credit belongs to JWZ, for saying: "Linux is only free if your time has no value".

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    7. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by Scott+Wood · · Score: 1

      You were willing to spend a whole day researching prices, but you weren't willing to spend an extra hour or so to put the parts together?

    8. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by sulli · · Score: 1
      Ha! No sir, it was JWZ [jwz.org], and he said it before Slashdot's UIDs were anywhere near your 235196.

      And only when you get to be an Old Unix Veteran do you get to be referred to by your initials, you young six-digit UID newbie NineNine!

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    9. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by LafinJack · · Score: 1

      Pardon me, but how the hell do you save $700 by building a computer yourself? I agree with your point, I just want to know who charges (and pays!) that much when most places want $50-$200.

      --
      we are building a religion
      a limited edition
      we are now accepting callers
      for these pendant key chains
    10. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not just putting parts together. It's the time it takes to remove your new NVIDIA GeForce 4 from its box, gaze at it in awe and wonderment, say a silent prayer of thanks to the gods of computing, and whisper affectionate nothings to it. Then repeat for each really nifty component. I can slap a normal box together in an hour or two, but a high-end system might take days.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    11. Re:Reminds me of that old saying... by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Just that picking the good part takes up much more time than the actual building part. Unless you (blindly) trust someone with his choice of parts.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  15. What about the case? by DBordello · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't the whole point of a mac the shinny case?

    1. Re:What about the case? by Funky+Jester · · Score: 1

      what, are you afraid of getting suuued? (ahk!)

  16. Re:No offense... by Scaebor · · Score: 1

    Despite their abhorrent control of the computing industry, I do not believe that my Micro$oft has gone quite so far as to control all manufacturers of all computer components to the extent of requiring windows on every computer.

    However, if look at it from the angle that some hardware won't work on anything but windows, I guess you could see this as being true to some extent (depending on how rabid you are in the microsoft paranoia department). Luckily, as I'm sure some Linux type would be sure to tell me, this problem (typically driver-based) is steadily being eliminated by all those hard-working Open Sourcers out there.

    --
    "Hey brother Christian with your high and mighty errand / your actions speak so loud I can't hear a word you're saying"
  17. Why not a clone? by stew77 · · Score: 5, Informative

    OS X is a chance for the clones to come back: This German vendor is selling OS X compatible Umax clones with G4 CPUs for EUR 729+.

    1. Re:Why not a clone? by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Some really nice deals, too bad its in Germany. Dual box (ppc) for 288, or a G4 system for 900.. That dual for 288 would make a kick ass linux box. If anyone knows of a place selling these in the USA, please post the url.

    2. Re:Why not a clone? by zulux · · Score: 2

      Jesus! That web page is sick!

      It's got twice the goat but none of the se.cx that we all crave. ..Leave it to the Germans to mix doule-mint twin farm animals, bad puns, and frankenstien electronics with Unix.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    3. Re:Why not a clone? by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Just import one, dumbass. You know, like international trade, dude.

      International shipping would cost a nice sum, might as well buy an upgraded system (locally) with the extra money. Defeats the purpose of a the cheap kickass system.

      Silly Anonymous Coward...

  18. Re:No offense... by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1
    Hardware-based control, no. But Microsoft's agreement with Dell prevents Dell from shipping computers without an OS, which briefly halted shipments of PC's from Dell with anything other than Windows on it.

    Fortunately, Dell worked around it by shipping boxes with a linux variant installed.

    It's not paranoia if everyone is actually out to get you. :)
    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  19. Re:No offense... by GutBomb · · Score: 2

    actually they used freedos, not a linux variant

  20. Another reason not doing it is because of the look by tungwaiyip · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The PC Case is just ugly. I'm considering to buy an iMac, partly because of it look, seriously. I'm a hardcore programmer. But Mac's look is just irresistible. I think the Unix core make it a partical machine for coding (besides web browsing, etc).

  21. case mod not 'building a g4' by spasm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    uh.. read the article. it's not 'building a g4 from scratch' so much as 'getting an apple mobo & other random g4 parts off ebay and mounting them in a pc case with some noisy fans', primarily because "it's impossible to use a Zip drive, CD-ROM, and DVD-ROM together in the same machine with any G4 that Apple has ever shipped".

    this is a glorified case-mod project for a specific end use, not 'building a g4 from scratch'.

    1. Re:case mod not 'building a g4' by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. That's pretty much what I do when I build a PC "from scratch". What do you do? Fire up Protel and design a motherboard, then think of a nifty new northbridge/southbridge design?

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    2. Re:case mod not 'building a g4' by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      I have a feeling that someone creating a case like this (with the overall high quality, slick look, built in handles, and swing-open side where the motherboard winds up laying on the table) that's ATX will effectively destroy any market for this.

      All you would need to use a standard ATX power supply would be an ATX power extension cable, I presume those exist in some form or another.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:case mod not 'building a g4' by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      http://www.mpja.com/product.asp?product=12833+CB

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  22. cheaper education systems by mbaudis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    apple frequently dumps older systems at the education stores. about 5 monthes ago, stanford had G4/533/CD-RW/40GB + 17 inch LCD for 1249 (that is 350 added to the screen). other examples are 899 (same time) for iBook 600/DVD. all new machines.

    1. Re:cheaper education systems by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      As this poor sould is well aware because the PC stores just never give him the same satisfaction

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:cheaper education systems by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Frequently, an extensive gay orgy will be taking place between rows of iPods and G4's. Check it out sometime !!!

      Yeah, I noticed that even Windows users get curious about different OSes sometimes. Most Windows-owning teenagers go through a phase of interest in Macs, sometimes to the point of experimenting with a Mac, or taking part in "user meetings" such as you describe.

      Some go on to buy a Mac, most decide a Mac isn't for them. Others get so paranoid about their liking for Macs that they post anti-Mac flames and masturbate over pictures of Bill Gates.

      So, if Mac users are meant to be gay, does this mean that Windows users are straight?
      And what about Linux users? They invent their own sexual devices and write kernel drivers for them because they're geeks and can't get laid? (Not even when `experimenting' with OS-X Macs between rows of iPods, G4s and extensive gay orgies)

      BDSM^h^h^h^hBSD users probably enjoy weird practises that few other people are into.

      As for BeOS fans... I just figured out where all those goatse.cx links came from.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  23. Re:Mac OS is proprietary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually the base OS, darwin is . So it isnt "completely closed source".

  24. Re:Pretty cool, but its not my box of springs by blixel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Does anyone have any information on building a PC from scratch?

    TomsHardware.com recently ran an article (with pictures) on how to build a PC yourself. It's really quite simple though. I have an abnormal fear of tools yet I've been building my own computers for 10 years. If you can install your own video card, you can build a computer.

  25. Re:No offense... by TheDanish · · Score: 1

    It's a PC user's sentiment. Or a hobbyist who just wants to build a Mac. I might consider it. Of course, it would probably be smarter just to get a really low-end system from Apple and upgrade parts from Ebay. But hey, I'm a stupid PC user, so what do I know?

    --
    Danish != nationality
  26. Re:No offense... by Mark+Imbriaco · · Score: 1

    No, but as a matter of fact, you don't need to pay Microsoft whether you run Windows or not. At least, not if you purchase it as parts and assemble it yourself.

  27. Re:Mac OS is proprietary by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2

    The reason why it's making so many headlines is because a "mainstream" Unix-based OS is finally emerging, vindicating all of us Linux/BSD geeks who loved Unix for all this time. MacOS X makes an okay Unix, but has a great GUI. Something the free desktop projects should think about emulating... oh, wait, they already are.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  28. Not wanting to pay Apple prices by Galvatron · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From page 2 of the instructions: New processors start at around $400 regardless of vendor.

    Ouch, given that an Athlon XP 2000+ can be had for under $100, it sounds like you're still paying Apple prices.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:Not wanting to pay Apple prices by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      What the hell?

      Who keeps moderating everything in this story as a troll? Stop giving this man mod points!

    2. Re:Not wanting to pay Apple prices by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You might as well buy a used Apple G4. I considered the article interesting, but I just build myself a dual-proc rig for Linux a couple of months ago.

      The point is, is anyone willing to sell a stripped down 400Mhz-based G4? Or even better: Can anyone find one?

      We all know that Apple is not going to bring OSX to x86, so why not create a PCI imac daughter card Apple? That way we can run OSX too!(don't know how fast that would be though).

    3. Re:Not wanting to pay Apple prices by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The advantage of /.'s moderation system is that it is easy to browse at a certain "level." /. puts out a lot more articles a day than K5, and they tend to have a very different feel.

      I do like K5's system for their articles, but I don't think it would work well here. (Well, at least not for me...) The strategy here is more that no one person has a huge impact on the ratings; it's what a couple hundred people at a time, each with only 5 points. They can have a bit of impact on a single story, and hurt someone's karma... but the things correct themselves in time...

    4. Re:Not wanting to pay Apple prices by MonkeyBoy · · Score: 2
      The point is, is anyone willing to sell a stripped down 400Mhz-based G4? Or even better: Can anyone find one?
      Ask a silly question...

      May I suggest you try eBay?
      --

      Moof!

    5. Re:Not wanting to pay Apple prices by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Case in point: Why don't the evil-modaration-whiners all go into Preferences:Comments and play with the Reason Modifiers? Give all the Trolls +5 and all Insightfulls -3.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    6. Re:Not wanting to pay Apple prices by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      So do you get (at least) one MB L3 cache with your Athlon XP 2000+?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    7. Re:Not wanting to pay Apple prices by Galvatron · · Score: 1

      Do you get 1700 mhz clock speed with your G4? You're comparing different processors, and in all the tests I've seen, aside of course from the photoshop tests, modern G4 processors are significantly slower than modern x86 processors.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    8. Re:Not wanting to pay Apple prices by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      IOW you don't.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    9. Re:Not wanting to pay Apple prices by MasonMcD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sounds like you're still paying Apple prices

      I'm sure you meant "Motorola's prices." Understandable confusion. "paying Apple prices" rolls off /. tongues (fingers?) so much more easily. Maybe it's an f-key or something.

  29. Re:I want to build a SPARC, but can't buy parts by MonMotha · · Score: 2

    StrongARMs are highly integrated chips. One piece gets you all sorts of stuff up to things like LCD controllers. They're not exactly upgradable and usually not a do-it-yourself project to build one from scratch.

    However if you do still feel like building a StrongARM based machine from scratch (very difficult, I hope you're into board fabbing and have the gear to solder lots of exotic surface mount components), you might want to check out the LART.

    If starting from something premade is OK with you, there's an excellent developer community for Linux on iPAQs at handhelds.org. The iPAQ has a huge expansion bus that you could probably use to do neat things with. Of course some hardware hacking would still be required. You can probably get one with a broken batt and/or screen off eBay pretty cheap.

    Another option for a premade unit is the Lucent/Phillips IS2630 screenphone (Shannon). There's a project to run Linux on them called TuxScreen. Unfortunately they don't have any more of them for sale, but you might be able to find someone who bought more than one or who is done with theirs that's willing to sell you one. This is a pretty sweet phone, and there's lots of docs on modding it, but it's sure not a PC.

  30. Intel chip on logic board? by foonf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was looking at this picture of the backside of the logic board with some interest, having never seen the insides of a modern Mac before. I couldn't help but notice that one of the chips on this board, the middle of the three largish square ICs, appears to be made by Intel (there is a very distinctive large, lowercase i to the left of some other illegible text, which is one of Intel's trademarks). Its impossible to tell what it is from the picture. Is it a PCI bridge? The ethernet controller? You would think Apple would not be keen on using Intel components whenever possible, but then I guess any corporation is going to put profit first. Does anyone know what it is?

    --

    "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
    1. Re:Intel chip on logic board? by mjpaci · · Score: 2

      I'm sure it's a chip that is cheapest by far when purchased from Intel. Sure they could make their own or get it from another vendor, but at what price? Business is business, right? Besides, Apple is more in competition with MS, not Intel.

      --Mike

    2. Re:Intel chip on logic board? by MacEnvy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I just opened my G4/466 and checked it out (nice how we mac users can do this with one hand and keep typing with the other). It is the PCI chip. Apple isn't in competition with Intel, and there is more than one part on this motherboard made by Intel ...

      --


      ***
    3. Re:Intel chip on logic board? by v1x · · Score: 1

      When we retired a few older Macs in our lab last month, I was surprized to find one of the boards with an AMD chip in it. I guess this is how rumours about OSX/x86 get started.

  31. "from scratch" - get real by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The guy put a Mac motherboard in a PC case. That's hardly "from scratch". It's just a case mod.

    Now if he'd started from some non-Apple PPC motherboard, that would be more impressive.

    1. Re:"from scratch" - get real by dpbsmith · · Score: 2

      Amen. I was disappointed when I saw that a Mac motherboard was one of the recipe ingredients (and astonished that anyone would use the term "from scratch" to describe it).

      It's like saying you made raisin bread "from scratch" because you added raisins to the bread machine mix instead of buying readymade raisin bread.

      Of course, I build a six-bit binary multiplier out of relays when I was a kid... to me, using a processor on a chip is not making a computer "from scratch." And I'm sure there are people that feel that since I didn't wind the relay coils myself, _I_ was cheating...

    2. Re:"from scratch" - get real by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ahh, but putting a PC motherboard into a PC case IS building a PC from scratch?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    3. Re:"from scratch" - get real by Animats · · Score: 2
      Yes. Intel does make motherboards for its own processors, but so do others. When Intel first started making motherboards for Intel processors, the other motherboard manufacturers were concerned that Intel would take over the motherboard market, but they didn't.

      Mac clones can still be built, and even boot MacOS X and Jaguar. Now there's an interesting mod direction.

  32. Re:Pretty cool, but its not my box of springs by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    5) Install appropriate pirated version of window
    6) Install *NIX after realizing what shit windows is

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  33. who cares? by jchristopher · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Cramming an Apple motherboard into an ATX case is hardly "building a Mac from scratch".

    Now, if they had used some generic PowerPC motherboard and got it to boot OS X, that would be news. This isn't.

  34. Re:Mac OS is proprietary by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Seems pretty tinkerable to me, what's missing?

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  35. Drilling board - BAD IDEA by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 2

    From what I see of it, apparently he drilled his board in order to mount it. BAD IDEA!!! I'm willing to bet that there are solder traces that are under the board that you can't see. Cut one, and you can kiss the board goodbye - and if you're unlucky, you might've even killed other components in your system.

    And uh - not to troll, but where does the "cool" part come in? From what I see, he eBayed for parts, spent more than you would've direct from Apple, and loaded it in an ATX case. Uh, yay?

    --pi

    1. Re:Drilling board - BAD IDEA by Osty · · Score: 1

      From what I see of it, apparently he drilled his board in order to mount it. BAD IDEA!!! I'm willing to bet that there are solder traces that are under the board that you can't see. Cut one, and you can kiss the board goodbye - and if you're unlucky, you might've even killed other components in your system.

      Next time, read closer. He drilled the case, not the board. Reason being, the board didn't line up with the ATX mobo mounts in the case, so he marked out a couple of the mounting holes on the mobo and drilled those holes into the case. That way, he could mount the board without having to resort to rely on ties and PCI cards to keep the mobo stable.

    2. Re:Drilling board - BAD IDEA by x136 · · Score: 2

      I don't think he drilled the logic board. He drilled holes in the case to align with the pre-existing holes in the board, though.

      --
      SIGFEH
  36. Re:No offense... by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Actually it is the consumer's fault. If Mac lovers had pushed for clones, and not let them get pulverised in court, then there would be a suitible market.
    Unfortunately, Macs are the Beta of the computer world. Good at what they do, but mainstream shumcks don't demand them.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  37. I'd rather see by Squarewav · · Score: 1

    OSX for x86 I know its a pipe dream, I wonder if enofe people petition apple to release it for a rather high price, say 400$ so there not loosing money on hardware sales, I know I would pay 400$ for OSX if it ran on any (or just about any) x86 box

    1. Re:I'd rather see by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      first of all the core of OSX is a BSD, last I checked *BSD has been running well on x86 systems for a long time now, second do you realy think a 800mhz G4 is faster then a 2ghz p4, the last benchmarks I've seen show it takes a duel 1ghz G4 to surpass it, show me some benchmarks that dont involve photoshop, win32 photoshop is un unoptimized POS but I could realy care less about it, Im not stupid enofe to think that ppc apps can be run on a x86 box, hell I cant think of even one mac application that I would want to run, like I said the things based on BSD so porting many linux and BSD apps isnt that hard, sure it would be a little slower, but not that slow

  38. G4/400 home-built is a rip-off by MacEnvy · · Score: 1

    Seriously folks, he quotes a G4/400 at $800. And over at Ars, they quote one at $1000. I don't know about anyone else, but I bought mine on eBay - UPGRADED - for about $750. Go to www.baucomcomputers.com and see for yourself!

    This makes it more expensive to build your own, crappier version of a system that isn't that expensive to begin with. Unless you are a whiny Linux apologist.

    Whew, watch this get modded to 0 in the blink of an eye!

    --


    ***
  39. ATX power supply? by iainternet · · Score: 1

    "or modify a PC power supply to power your Mac"
    anyone seen any instructions for this?

  40. The Last Thing Apple Wants To Do by reallocate · · Score: 4, Informative

    The last thing Apple wants to do is encourage and enable people to "experiment" with OSX on non-Apple hardware. You've noticed, I suspect, that Apple has never marketed an x86 version of any of its operating systems That's because Apple is hardware company, not a software vendor. Sure, they write their own OS, but it is precisely the tight integration of that proprietary OS with proprietary hardware that maintains the "uniquesness" of the Mac. Whether or not that uniqueness is worth the price is a matter of opinion, but the approach does ensure that only company that builds Macs is Apple.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:The Last Thing Apple Wants To Do by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You've noticed, I suspect, that Apple has never marketed an x86 version of any of its operating systems That's because Apple is hardware company, not a software vendor.

      Well, you are correct that Apple is a hardware company, but that is not the reason for them not using x86.

      Woz himself said that he chose a Motorola clone chip for the Apple ][ because it was the cheapest CPU available at the time. Later, the Motorolla 68k was chosen for the original Macintosh for reasons of cost, performance (at the time), power efficiency, and familiarity (among Apple engineers). The PPC was developped jointly by Apple, IBM, and Motorola and it was easy to build in a compatability layer to the MacOS for running stuff from the old 680x0 chips. The G3 was branched off the very efficient PPC 603 line, and the G4 is essentially a G3 with Motorola's AltiVec system added to enhance vector performance.

      If Jobs had a time machine, he very well might want to go back and tell himself to insist on a CPU that handles x86 instructions. There have been a few shining moments when the PPC platform was the fastest chip for home use around, but most of the time that has not been the case.

      On the other hand, IBM went the x86 route (and an outsourced OS), and the results were disasterous for their PC division. Once Compaq reverse-engineered their ROM's, the game was over. Everybdoy was buying "IBM Compatable" computers, and no matter how good OS/2 became, there was nothing IBM could do to change the trend.

      So, I agree that making the move now would be a bad idea. If Apple were to move to x86, things would be fine as long as they didn't become more than 10% or so of the market. The moment they became a bigger player than that, somebody would consider it worth their while to clone them the way Compaq cloned IBM, and Apple would change from being Dell's strongest rival to just being a very tiny Microsoft, except without an Office suite for income, almost overnight. In other words, it could kill Apple.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:The Last Thing Apple Wants To Do by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      There is a difference with Apple as opposed to IBM.

      Apple actually makes the OS that shipped on the machines and no clone would be a real clone unless it ran the same OS so, that won't happen.

    3. Re:The Last Thing Apple Wants To Do by Golias · · Score: 1
      Let's not underestimate the effort IBM's inter-departmental warfare and insane marketing-to-developers efforts had in OS/2's fate.

      Right, because corporate in-fighting never goes on in Cupertino. (That would be sarcasm)

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  41. Re:I want to build a SPARC, but can't buy parts by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
    WRT the your SPARC question, I'd say to try emailling/phoning US-based distributors to see if any of them are willing to ship internationally. I'd imagine that at least a few would be, and you'd probably even save some money, even when you do factor in the increased shipping time and hassle in dealing with customs.

    As far as your request for an ATX based StrongARM board, there seem to be plenty of options out there, all you have to do is choose a vendor your comfortable with, it looks like.

    --

    Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  42. Re:No offense... by reallocate · · Score: 2

    How, exactly, might "Mac lovers" have prevented Apple from defeating the clone manufacturers in court? Sales figures and market share are irrelevant if you been caught infringing trademark and copyright and violating license agreements.

    Interesting use of the word "beta", too.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  43. NOT a build.... by z-kungfu · · Score: 1

    ...merely put some Apple parts in a PC case. Can you say case mod? As for the price, you can buy a used G4- AGP for $800 easy, so this saves you no money, and if your time is worth money you lose. As for his assertation that you can't put a DVD, CD, and Zip in and Apple cased, wrong, Hell my 9600 had all those and 3 SCSI drives inside. So big whoopdeee dooo for this guy. For the money I'll just buy the new dual 867.

  44. Re:No offense... by reallocate · · Score: 2

    All that modularity is there because it reduces manufacturing costs, not because someone wants to sell to the homebrew crowd. It enables the Dells of the world to build more boxes faster and cheaper. It also allows them to cut costs by purchasing generic components. I doubt there's enough money in selling parts into the home-built market to sustain any but the most specialized vendors.

    That this is at all possible is due to the open architecture designed into the original PC by the IBM team in Boca Raton.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  45. troll/clown by obtuse · · Score: 1

    Dude! The lines you just posted will be my new sig. Thanks!

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  46. Re:No offense... by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Beta refers to the VCR, not the "testing".
    Plus MS, Symantec, and others have been caught violating copyrights, and nothing was done. Why? Consumers still support them massively.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  47. Re:Mac OS is proprietary by MoneyT · · Score: 2
    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  48. What next? A Mac logic board in a Mac case? by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, this is so exciting... first a PC board in a Mac case, now a Mac board in a PC case.

    How long before someone takes a G4 Mac, removes the logic board from it, puts it back, and put up detailed step-by-step photos on a Web site showing what he or she has accomplished?

  49. Re:No offense... by reallocate · · Score: 2

    >> Beta refers to the VCR, not the "testing"...

    Oh, that. Oops.

    No one has ever successfully marketed a Mac clone that would run an Apple OS and successfully defended itself against the inevitable Apple lawsuit. If you want to build a homebrew Mac in your basement, they don't care. If you put it in a pretty box and start selling it by the thousands, they'll roll all over you.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  50. Re:Mac OS is proprietary by chrysrobyn · · Score: 2

    I don't understand why a bunch of people want to run OS X anyway. It's proprietary and completely closed source. If you're a serious graphics designer, sure, I can see your reason for wanting OS X.

    But, slashdot geeks... I can't understand why they'd want something that removes all kinds of ability to tinker and has a shitty EULA. The OS may be a step up from Windows, but the EULA is almost as shitty.

    I'm a /. geek. I'm here running Moz 1.1 on my OSX 10.2 dual G4 500. I love this machine. I ran OS/2 and NT for years. When I didn't have the hardware for a decent machine, I put Linux on it and got a few extra miles. Last year, I was the recipient of a used Mac, the mecca of my class of geek. What did I want? I wanted UNIX class stability and speed (and that familiar command line from 7 years of *nix use). I wanted main stream apps, natively.

    To me, a non-programmer sort, Linux adds little value. There's some geek value I can pretend to have when I apt-get the Debian box under my control, or wget/make config/make install my Slackware server, but there's something great to running Office, Starcraft/Warcraft, Bloatus Notes and then drop to a shell that uses sane commands (ipconfig, ls, etc.). And if there's an update, Software Update takes care of that for me.

    Oh, and I don't care about an EULA. Like the rest of America, I just click through and never read them.

  51. Re:It doesn't work out of the box by Mononoke · · Score: 1
    [Watch it over and over... the commercial about that Gateway that looks like the iMac.... much more useful, easier to use, faster, and costs a lot less]
    You mean that one that doesn't even come with an ethernet port or a modem?

    No wonder it's faster and cheaper. Probably has no built-in facilities for wireless either.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  52. Re:Mac OS is proprietary by reallocate · · Score: 2

    It is worth remembering that a lot of folks don't have much interest in all the open source/free software wrangling and use Linux because it is essentially Unix. For them, t's just a good Unix clone that doesn't cost an arm and a leg.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  53. Re:No offense... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

    mmm freedos. sounds like a crunchy, crispy, cheesy snack.

  54. The return of Hackintosh by Woggle · · Score: 1

    -=chuckles=- Oh look, its a Hackintosh(old Computer Shopper reference for you guys). Still more cost effective than buying a Mac, though not by much, the beauty lies in the customization options.

    --
    Wogs "Freedom's just another word for having nothing left to lose."
  55. No Kidding? Department by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2
    Note: This article is for information only. Neither the author nor MacOpz.com offer any warranty, implied, expressed, or otherwise, that the information here is 100% accurate, and, hereby disclaim any liability which may arise from your reading this article and attempting to construct what is shown here. The reader should possess the minimal skills technical skills necessary in dealing with computer parts prior to beginning any "do it yourself" project of this nature.
    The fact that someone would try to sue over some potentially misguided information they found on the web and Tried This At Home is a little depressing.
    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  56. keyboards by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    There fine, unless you outside the US.
    All the macs i've ever seen in the UK have US keyboards.

    Uk
    " = shift+2
    @ = shift + ' (where the " is on a US keyboard)
    £ = shift + 3

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:keyboards by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I did not know that. Although as a nifty bit of trivia, that would mean my C64 keyboard was a UK keyboard. Spiffy.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  57. Here's what I would love Apple to do: by Rellik66 · · Score: 1
    If enough people are doing this, why can't Apple just sell G4 Motherboards that fit perfectly into a ATX case. Of course this will be aimed at the hobbyest, and hardcore Mac user market
    • it could use a standard ATX power supply
    • USB fits in the USB spot, Firewire goes in the serial spot and sound fits sound or include a custom back plate
    • have a AMR style modem and Network card
    • sell at a fairly low cost with a bit of a premium, like say $300-$400 with CPU
    This is something I would definately do
    --

    Too many zeros, not enough ones

    1. Re:Here's what I would love Apple to do: by ZigMonty · · Score: 1
      sell at a fairly low cost with a bit of a premium, like say $300-$400 with CPU

      Think. Is this good for Apple or goog for you? There is a difference.

  58. OT: What? by nuntius · · Score: 1

    "they bug out when opening many apps"?!?

    Windows likes to BSOD, but if your processor is causing issues, then you either need a bigger heat sink or have bad RAM.

    Processor reliability is independent of number of applications (assuming overheating doesn't occur).

    Maybe an unstable OS is what you meant to blame?

    1. Re:OT: What? by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      I have had overheating issues, though I believe that may have had something to do with my lack of AC and a shitty heatsink.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  59. Price and Value ? by azav · · Score: 1

    Anyone care to compare the value of this project should put a $$ sign on their TIME and then check out used macs selling on places like http://www.Craigslist.org.

    Unless you are in school and po or your time is just not worth a lot of money (or you have more time than money), this project is not cost effecient. Cool for sure though.

    Check out this posting from Craigslist for a system for $1000

    Powermac G4 450 AGP /768 MB Ram /30 GB HD/CD RW & Zip Drive/17" Flat Tube sony monitor Trintron 200ES

    450 mhz PowerPC
    16 MB Video Card
    768 MB Ram
    super fast Internal CD RW 24x Write 12x Rewirte
    100 MB ZIP Drive
    30 GB Hard Drive
    2 Fire wire ,2 USB ,Modem ,Ethernet, Pro keyboard and optical mouse
    It is in mint conditon .
    17" Flat tube(not flat panel) sony Trinitron is included
    OS X.2 jaguar and OS 9.2.2- installed
    Other software installed :
    Photoshop 7,illustator 10,Freehand 10,Dreamweaver MX ,
    Flash Mx ,Firework MX ,OFFICE X ,Toast 5.1.3,Quark 5
    Video Editing software :Final Cut pro 3,Cleaner 5,After Effect 5.5
    Call or email me if you have any questions 415-xxx-3332
    $1000 Firm

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  60. How To Build A Buck From Scratch by reallocate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Step One: Buy 3 Used Buicks ....

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  61. Re:It doesn't work out of the box by ajakk · · Score: 2

    Amazingly, the lowest end Gateway Profile 4 comes with an integrated ethernet port (with a modem optional) and the other two base models have both standard. Perhaps you should have checked it out yourself.

  62. Overclocking? by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    From the article:

    Furthermore, water cooling projects for the overclockers become more of a reality.

    Aren't PowerPC chips basically un-overclockable? From what I understand, something about the chip design makes it either impossible to overclock it, or makes the speed gained from overclocking it negligble.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:Overclocking? by Gropo · · Score: 1

      Nope, There are a few sites devoted to PPC/OC projects.
      There were a few boards manufactured with hard-wired clock multipliers (such as my G4-500 server) however, most G3/G4 *daughtercard-mounted* CPU's are fully OC-able with consonant performance increases to x86 projects.

      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    2. Re:Overclocking? by tobyglyn · · Score: 1

      PPC are very clockable, especially when single processor Macs share the same heat sink as dual processor Macs.

      My Cube has 2 x 500mhz G4 processors (DP Apple module) each clocked to 550mhz.

  63. Re:Pretty cool, but its not my box of springs by Hobophile · · Score: 1
    5) Install appropriate pirated version of window 6) Install *NIX after realizing what shit windows is

    7) ????
    8) Profi... just kidding.

  64. Re:It doesn't work out of the box by Mononoke · · Score: 1
    1. It has both.
    No, it doesn't. I was wrong about the ethernet, but the modem is optional.
    2. You seem to be a Mac user, so you will not understand the concept of price but, FYI, a NIC is $15 and a modem is $20.
    The NIC also costs a PCI slot when not included in the MB.

    You call me a "Mac user" like you think it's some kind of insult. It's not. "Anonymous Coward" is an insult. You seem to be one of those.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  65. Re:EULA violation: Who cares? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    It is a violation of the EULA for Mac OS to run it on any non-Apple-branded hardware.

    I really don't care. I simply ignore EULAs. In fact, I make it a point to not even read them (and I note that Microsoft does not even require that you scroll to the end of the EULA before clicking "I Agree.") I don't violate copyright law by pirating software, but the EULAs are filled with unreasonable crap that just gets my blood boiling.

    So, if Apple, Microsoft, or any other vendor wishes to sue me for violating their EULA, bring it on. I'm tired of the bullshit. You make a product and I buy it. It's not a "license to use" and I'm not playing that game any more.

  66. Re:older bus speeds by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    No question the older boxes have serious limits on bus speed. My point was that it's cheaper to buy an 8600 just to get the case, power supply, floppy, mouse, and CD drive then it is to buy the parts separately.
    You'll end up with a near-server class case and power supply (complete with flip-open side, anchored cable harness, etc.) and a bunch of devices for the cost of an inferior case bought alone. Of course, getting the guts of a whole other Mac, in effect, for free, is a fun bit of icing on the cake.
    As for the used parts pricing and those implications, oh dear. Please don't get me started on that. Let's just say that since the resale value of the Newton IP alone (even given a licence that only allows sales in the developing world) would be worth more to the right buyer than, say, the entire Visor corporation shows that Apple still makes a regular habit of sticking their head WAY up where the sun don't shine.
    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  67. This is not a Hackintosh! by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
    When I saw this article, I was expecting that it would say something about getting OS X to run on a non-Apple, non-clone motherboard. In other words, a Hackintosh. False adversiting.

    Not only is it only about upgrading old Mac motherboards, but even the linked page says it's about building your own G4 from scratch. The only part of this that's not a simple "upgrade your old Mac to run OS X" is that it mentions using regular ATX cases. I can't see why you would want to do that unless you were doing a cool case mod.

    Pardon me for yawning, but been there done that about to replace a Linux box with one. And the only reason I did it is I already had an old Power Computing Mac that was already sufficiently upgraded. I'm now debating whether it's worth upgrading my $60 thrift store Power Wave.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  68. "Feels cheaper" by glrotate · · Score: 1
    "Granted the PC was cheaper, but it also feels cheaper."

    I'm curious, how often do you feel your PC? Mine just sits on the floor chuging away. I guess if you're into the tactile pleasures of handling your computer the Mac may be the way to go. For the rest of us who are interested in Price:Performance the PC still leads the way.

    1. Re:"Feels cheaper" by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Every machine has a certain feel to it. The way it runs, handles and responds to your commands. It's uptime, it's part reliability. All of this makes up a general feel too a machine. We expect our machines to react a certain way to certain situations, and we customize outr machines to a certain feel. This is why we generaly feel more comfortable on our own computer than on someone elses despite the fact that the two may be identical in terms of configuration.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  69. Is not! by gerardrj · · Score: 1

    This is about as comparable to building a Mac from scratch as making a meal from scratch is to tearing the platic from the pudding, poking holes over the remaining items and microwaving for 6 minutes. (Do you think I eat too many microwave meals)

    No-one builds computers from scratch any more, they just assemble off the shelf parts with idiot-proof keyed connectors.
    These lamoid "new generation" hackers don't know what "from scratch" means. They should try wire-wrapping or resist ething your own board some time. I'll bet they couldn't build a simple countdown timer with LED output from scratch if their life depended on it. Computer from scratch; humf.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    1. Re:Is not! by gerardrj · · Score: 2

      None of these are 486 or other "modern" CPU systems. But they are good starting places for learning basic system and board design. Once you understand timing, busses, signaling, etc you can just start reading chip specs and work out how to connect them together via buffers and controllers.

      These pages don't necesarily have a lot of design stuff on them, but have many references to places the people pulled info from.

      http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie95/2a2/2a23/2a23.h tm
      http://www.home-micros.freeserve.co.uk/uk101/uk1 01 .html
      http://www2.whidbey.com/~beattidp/comput/x6 5tools/ diy6502/diy6502.htm
      http://et.nmsu.edu/~etti/fall 98/electronics/zargar i/zargari.html

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  70. its till apple by SlamMan · · Score: 2

    Just to check, we all noticed that they're still using a fair number of apple aprts, right? Its not like its parts made by somebody else, he's just scavangeing parts from other sources than apple for apple stuff.

    --
    Mod point free since 2001
  71. Re:Destroy microsoft, we win. by NitroPye · · Score: 1

    Dont start this again...

    If you want to software get the whole package, they are not more expensive if you add it all up... in fact the ibooks are VERY well priced for cheap laptops, the higher end apples, are insanly high priced though...

    Ever try NeXTSTEP for Intel? ..HORRIBLE hardware support, think about how insane it would be to port the os to x86 then support ALL THE freakin cheapo hardware...

    I dont own a mac yet (tibook for college soon) but, I can tell you that other then macos my reasons for going apple are the whole package, the support, the community, the well done everything,
    and the analness of steve jobs...

  72. WTF by NitroPye · · Score: 1

    wtf is up with my reply title, i never wrote that???!? WTF

  73. homebrew Apple II in 1980-ish by vtweb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I couldn't afford an Apple II, so I bought the
    little spiral bound manual. It thoughtfully
    included a full schematic (with part numbers),
    and the full Boot and Bios Rom listings! I think
    it was the Rom code that tipped me over the edge
    into the project of building my own.

    I wire wrapped the circuits, and hand programmed
    byte by byte the 5 Roms (2705s, if I recall). One
    for Bios, and 4 for Apple Basic. Memory chips
    were the most expensive components at the time.

    And it worked! Noisy circuitry, I almost had to
    position my hands like I was playing a therimin
    to get it to have a clean display.

    Super of Apple to do 'open source' before it was cool!

  74. Apple pisses you off, do they? by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    My. Bitter much?

    OK, in order,
    Also some of the apps you mentioned are very processor intensive. Which ones? I only mentioned two and I've done heavy work on both on setups much smaller than the ones that I mentioned. (though, then again, I also did tabloid layouts in Quark XPress on an SE so perhaps I'm just insane.)
    Until Motorola gets off its ass...[blah,blah,blah]I agree that Moto's lost its mojo. That's exactly why Apple is fighting to get control over this AltiVec thing and switch to both multi-CPU standard and IBM as primary chip source. Personally I'ld prefer to see them do a hostile takeover of Motorola and personally DESTROY EVERY EXECUTIVE THERE but that's just me and perhaps I'm a tad vindictive.
    [rant that consumers are stupid and fall for this MHz baloney] And where precisely did I disagree with that? Though as it happens I think that that is starting to lose power as a generation of buyers comes in that is far more tech-literate.
    They have also had a history of sticking it to the dev's. Yes, they do. Including friends of mine and to me as an IT guy who stood up for them and got screwed. Again, where exactly did I say otherwise?
    [blah, blah, apple are assholes, their tech is cool, company is untrustworthy, more Apple screws devs, some distorted perception re cloning] Yeah. So what? I'ld rather be with a, what is that, " bussness"?"busness"? that is reliably profitable so they won't go the way of DEC, Amiga, etc., etc., etc.
    ["I'm a gamer; I NEED power.] Bully for you. I don't know what thread you *think* you're in but this is one about building low-cost, scratch-built boxes and that was what I wrote about.
    Some of my family will buy a computer [for] wizo bango software [from] best buy.[they make foolish choices and it pisses me off] I'm sorry and I feel your pain. Users suck, especially when they sit at the dinner table and blame *you* for *their* cluelessness. But again, isn't this a thread about purchasing by folks who solder for fun?
    Thanks for the links though. You're most welcome. I hope that they come in useful.
    Rustin
    Oh, BTW, I apologize to everybody out there for my universally sour tone these days. Sometimes starting a company on no money really isn't fun at all and I'm afraid that you folks are getting some bleedthrough. I will try to give a little more thought in the future to giving my posts a lower arrogant asshole factor (AAF? perhaps a new mod variable).

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  75. or Sparc? or Alpha? by axxackall · · Score: 1
    I wonder if I can find *classical* used Unix workstations for a better price/performance ratio than used G4.

    By the way, Linux will work exactly same way (or even better ) as it will run on PPC. Either way, Sparc, Alpha or PPC, no need to buy any proprietary OS, especially that crappy Mac OS * :)

    --

    Less is more !
  76. Cease and desist. by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 2, Troll
    Dewey, Cheatham, and Howe, P.A.
    Cupertino, CA
    15 September 2002

    Dear Slashdot Editors:

    Your article on building Macintoshes is a threat to the valuable intellectual property rights of our client, Apple Computer. You are hereby ordered to cease and desist publication of this article, or face legal action.

    All your Mac are belong to us.

    Sincerely,

    I. Will Cheatham, Esq.
    Dewey, Cheatham, and Howe, P.A.

    --
    Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
    Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
  77. Jonny Appleseed by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    Oh lord. Now you're done it. Somewhere within a year, we're gonna see a new Darwin group calling themselves the Johnny A.'s or the JA Consortium or JohnA L0pht or something.
    And it will all be your fault.
    I hope that you're sorry.
    In very other words, cool metaphor; I like it. Other people probably do too.

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  78. Re:Mac OS is proprietary by axxackall · · Score: 1, Insightful
    "mainstream"? Whay is it mainstream? Can you explain or prove it?

    great GUI? What is so great in Aqua? I've tried it and did not find any thng better than I have in Gnome 2. It's even worse as it's not X11 - I hate GUI without remote access. We live in the internet age - both win32 and Mac OS (X) looks like old legacy dinos.

    --

    Less is more !
  79. Re:Pretty cool, but its not my box of springs by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2

    Can I use electromechanical relays?

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
  80. I can build a DEC MVax II from scratch by gelfling · · Score: 2

    And it costs nearly zero. It's called software emulation. I have an old PDP 11 and a Vax 1180 as well as a Univac 1180/82E running Octal around here somewhere. Oh and again it's in software.

    Honestly if you build something out of used/junk parts it's because you need a cheap limited purpose server to do some mindless task quietly in the corner. Not that this is bad thing. I have a house full of Frankenclones for routers, firewalls, mail servers and so on.

  81. Re:mouse by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    Quick question. Are you perhaps under the impression that Apple is still selling the disk-shaped mouse? That's been gone for years.

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  82. Nice heatsink,,, by Reece400 · · Score: 1

    LOL :), I like the fact that they're using an Intel heatsink,,, sure, they might have a mac,, but to anyone who looked in the side of the case, it'd sure as hell look like a wintel PC,, (case, heatsink, etc.) what's the point of having an apple if ya can't show it off??

    Reece,

  83. Re:Build your own 'Cat Mac' by mfnickster · · Score: 1

    I checked this book out from our local library a while back. It details how to build a 'catalog Mac' of the 68k variety. You still need some genuine Apple parts, though.

    You might try Alibris - the author is Bob Brant.

    They have a few copies for sale-- most of them overpriced, IMHO, since they deal with such outdated hardware. You might get inspired by it, but I doubt you'd actually want to build the machines he covers in the book.

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  84. modded to What?!? by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'm a bit pissy. Even a lot pissy. But if you think that this only merits a 1, well, I'm just glad that I'm shifting my focus to my own site soon.
    Enjoy my refs while you can, Malda and co. 'cause in two months or so I'll be gone, gone, gone.

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  85. Quotes... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

    If you're going to put quotes around it, at least get the sentence right.

    Ben Franklin said in 1784, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." (That's the most reliable one I can get out of Google.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    1. Re:Quotes... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

      Humm I thought my quote came from a reliable source. Guess i was wrong

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  86. Re:Another reason not doing it is because of the l by Enahs · · Score: 2
    Make sure you have an authorized Apple service place near you, because you will not want to work on the iMac yourself, even if it's a later model.

    Even swapping out the CD-ROM drive is a massive chore IMHO.

    --
    Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
  87. Re:It doesn't work out of the box by noewun · · Score: 1
    You're either very stupid, or a troll.

    Or a very stupid troll.

    I'm writing this on a three year old G3 laptop. It came with a modem, USB, Firewire, audio in and out, video out and 10/100 ethernet. In three years all I've had to add is extra memory.

    And then there is usability. Once you have spent extra to get your Mac to be hardware comparable to the PC, it is still useless for most application situations. The Mac excels in a few niches, but if you want to "think different" and do more with the machine, get a PC.

    You're right. That useless MS Office application. And that useless Photoshop application. And all those useless programming environements. And all that useless video editing software. And audio software.

    To quote a friend of mine, you're not even a moron. You're a moroff.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  88. you should at least skim the EULA by Artifex · · Score: 2

    I simply ignore EULAs. In fact, I make it a point to not even read them

    That's where, most of the time, the publisher divulges if a product contains adware, spyware, i'm-taking-all-your-honeymoon-pictures-and-startin g-an-amateur-pr0n-site-ware, etc.

    As this may be the only place you can read about those things (before Ad-Aware catches up), if they're not obviously listed as installation options, you'd be better off going through it.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:you should at least skim the EULA by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      As this may be the only place you can read about those things (before Ad-Aware catches up), if they're not obviously listed as installation options, you'd be better off going through it.

      I do use Ad-Aware as well as ZoneAlarm. I normally find out about spyware pretty quickly. While some more reputable publishers list the information, many disreputable publishers do not. I also don't tend to install random, unknown software. By the time I install it on my main computer, it's thoroughly tested -- either by others or by me on a spare machine.

    2. Re:you should at least skim the EULA by Artifex · · Score: 2

      Okay, good enough! I'm also not in the habit of installing anything I can't get a good report on, but I've got a firewall and Proximotron running, as well as ZA and ad-aware, just in case. I know it's overkill, but it's also an end to popups and all kinds of other crap.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  89. BeOS cannot run on G3/G4 -- needs 604 or below by douglasq · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I am wrong but I don't think BeOS can run on a G3 or G4 except through emulation like VPC. Apple never gave Be what it needed for that generation of processors.

    --
    "Form should follow function...unless it's just plain ugly."
    1. Re:BeOS cannot run on G3/G4 -- needs 604 or below by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Looks like you may be right, though a handful of people are trying here and there.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:BeOS cannot run on G3/G4 -- needs 604 or below by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Be claims that Apple never gave them the info for the motherboards, not the processors.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  90. Re:It doesn't work out of the box by noewun · · Score: 1

    'Twere sarcasm.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  91. hardware violation by Reziac · · Score: 2

    More to the point -- seriously, how long before Apple tries to shut them down for recreating (reverse-engineering?) the Mac without a license??

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:hardware violation by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Since they are recreating the Mac from an original Apple motherboard - how about never?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:hardware violation by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I was thinking of the fact that Apple has nixed their *own* clone manufacturers, preferring to remain the exclusive source for Apple hardware. I vaguely recall they went after someone else who was building compatible hardware, too (maybe someone here remembers more about that).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:hardware violation by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      I don't think so.

      There was the eMachine & other lawsuits based on Trade dress (Apple won BTW).

      There was also the old Franklin Apple ][ clone that Apple sued out of business.

      But, no clone maker of Macs other than the ones that were licensed (Apple bought Power Computing)

  92. DANGER!!! When installing CPU thermal compiund... by jerkychew · · Score: 2

    ...DO NOT follow this guy's instructions! He ended up making a total mess, and risked frying his CPU.

    While it's improbable, it is possible that spreading thermal paste on anything other than the CPU core could cause the system to short circuit. The author at macopz got the adhesive all over the freaking CPU, which could lead to problems down the road. Please read Arctic Silver's instructions if you've never applied thermal paste before. This guy DOES NOT know what he's doing, at least when it comes to installing processors.

  93. Build PCs for quality, so this gets you...? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    A few times when I've built my own PC's from scratch I did so because I wasn't quite satisfied with the quality of all parts offered in any given pre-built system.

    One of the reasons to buy a Mac though is the build quality and cohesive selection of parts. (More true of the laptops than the desktops, but still).

    I have no desire to build my own mac because I'm happy enough with how they've already built them!

    And like others have said if you're just after a cheap system to play with buying used will probably be about as cheap as scrounging components, plus it will probably look a lot better...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  94. Re:Pretty cool, but its not my box of springs by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Well for starters there's this

    and this

    or these

    these too

    this too along with this

    and this

    Had enough yet?

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  95. Re:Pretty cool, but its not my box of springs by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    Damn, shoulda hit preview. Maybe it should be a requirement, no more post button, you have to hit preview

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  96. Re:You do? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

    You go to the "fastestest" option, and strip it down.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  97. Crap! by otuz · · Score: 1

    What's so interesting in fitting a Apple motherboard into a PC case? At least it's not building a Mac G4 from scratch.

    To do so, you'd have to find a generic "no-name" ppc74xx-compatible motherboard.. I think Motorola made some test boards for 8xxx series (with RapidIO) and the Amiga boom last year promised some new PPC motherboards too. Too bad none are shipping consumer products alike the x86 mobos.

    Anyway, the "article" was quite misleading.
    A "Case Mod" != "Build a Macintosh From Scratch" :(

  98. If by scratch, by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 2, Funny

    you mean entirely out of money!

    --
    | - | - |
  99. Re:DANGER!!! When installing CPU thermal compiund. by jerkychew · · Score: 1

    Directly from the article:

    "The first thing to do is to prepare the thermal cooling solution. I used a little Arctic Silver that I had around and put about half a pea sized amount on the top of the CPU."

    So yeah, it is Arctic Silver. And those metal heatsinks only come in contact with the CPU core.

  100. That's what FireWire is for by alispguru · · Score: 2

    it's impossible to use a Zip drive, CD-ROM, and DVD-ROM together in the same machine with any G4 that Apple has ever shipped.

    Good lord, haven't these people ever heard of FireWire? All of those devices have FireWire versions - hell, you could probably put all three of them on one port, run them all simultaneously, and see no performance hit over having them in the case.
    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  101. Re:mouse by norton_I · · Score: 2

    No, I am thinking of the "pill shaped" mice (for lack of a better term) where the button is the mouse.

    They are approximately the right shape, though they don't feel particularly comfortable to me, but the fact that I can't rest my hand on it without clicking sucks.

    I suppose many people probably wouldn't have a problem with them, but I am particulary picky about input devices, if I had a choice I wouldn't use anything other than the Logitech optical MouseMan wheel. Unfortunately, they don't make it any more, and I don't particularly care for the new model.

  102. Re:Another reason not doing it is because of the l by pi+radians · · Score: 2

    Actually, with all of the new Macs the developer tools are on the harddrive in a package. It only takes a double click.

    --

    sin(6cos(r)+5A)
  103. I've had extremely bad luck with this. by emil · · Score: 2

    I bought an 8500 off ebay for around $75.

    First, the 8500 was designed by a drunk. This is not an easy machine to rip apart.

    Second, after downloading Stuffit and trying to run it, I get an application error message. I have been unable to run XPostFacto because I can't even get Stuffit working.

    Third, after moving some of the DIMMs around (thinking Stuffit's problem is RAM-related), the system won't boot at all.

    Fourth, even if I did get Stuffit working, XPostFacto requires the existence of a MacOS 9 partition; you cannot natively install OSX only (it plays a trick and moves the root directory from the CD to disk filesystem). I bought a 9gig Micropolis SCSI drive to solve this problem, not that it's been much use.

    This pile of junk is sitting on my kitchen floor until I have time to deal with it, which may be never.

  104. Re:Another reason not doing it is because of the l by King+Babar · · Score: 2
    Actually, with all of the new Macs the developer tools are on the harddrive in a package. It only takes a double click.

    Well, I'll be a monkey's distant cousin. You're right. :-) (For my fellow clueless: check in "/Applications/Installers/Developer Tools".) And here I was, wondering when I'd remember to haul my Developer's tools disk into work (or wait for all bazillion megs of software to download from Apple) to get those up and running on my new G4. Now, you'd think that would get more prominently mentioned somewhere...

    Of course, the Developer Tools get even more interesting when you realize that you can use Interface Builder with Perl (using CamelBones and with Ruby using the RubyCocoa stuff, and probably with Python using a tool taht I haven't tried to look up yet.

    Life is just grand.

    --

    Babar

  105. Re:mouse by flagstone · · Score: 1

    They are approximately the right shape, though they don't feel particularly comfortable to me, but the fact that I can't rest my hand on it without clicking sucks.


    I can certainly see where mouse preference is a personal thing, but just to make sure...

    You do know the tension of the mouse click is adjustable on the bottom? I have a friend who could not use the mouse as shipped, but wasn't aware that the mouse click force was hardware adjustable.
    --
    These people have looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
  106. Hang on a sec by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

    "There is no way that a 1GHz G4 competes with an Athlon MP 2000, and most of the other components are comparable."

    Would you say your Athlon MP 2000 (which runs around 1500 MHz) is comparable to an Intel Pentium 4 2000? If you do, then you must concede the possibility that the PowerPC G4 1000 may likewise be comparable.

    If the Athlon can overcome a 33% clock speed deficit, the PowerPC may be able to overcome a 50% clock speed deficit.

    1. Re:Hang on a sec by norton_I · · Score: 1

      This is based on benchmarks, my limited experience actually using PPCs, and experiences of others who have used both, as well as my knowledge of the archetecture and expected IPC, not just some vauge notion that more MHz is mo' betta. And the Athlon MP 2000 runs at 1.67 GHz, not 1.5, so it is more like 20% vs 67%. I do think that a 1 GHz G4 can (probably) outperform an equivelently clocked Athlon, which in turn can outperform a similarly clocked P4, but I haven't seen anything to indicate it can overcome a 40% clock speed deficit. The benchmarks I have seen show that even in most "content creation" benchmarks (photoshop and the like) -- the bread and butter of Apple, a Dual Athlon runs circles around the dual G4, and for day-to-day responsivness ("feel") the Athlon beats out the G4 as well.

  107. Deploying Clue Stick by TwitchCHNO · · Score: 1

    [Quoting TotallyUseless]

    Re:EULA violation (Score:1)
    by TotallyUseless (tot@m[ ]com ['ac.' in gap]) on Monday September 16, @03:13PM (#4267833)
    (User #157895 Info | http://www.shiner.com/)

    There are no Mac boot roms, at least not on the hardware. None. At all.

    [End Quote]

    I'll paste the info from the TIL article.

    What is iMac Firmware Update?

    iMac Firmware Update is based on customer feedback, and increases the reliability of iMac booting. It is being provided to every iMac customer as preventive maintenance. The iMac Firmware update upgrades the Open Firmware boot ROM code using a simple application downloadable from Apple's web site.

    2. Dual-image boot ROM
    The iMac Firmware update installs a second boot ROM image within the flashable ROM. Should there ever be a future firmware update, the second image serves as a backup should the firmware update fail. Although a firmware update failure is highly unlikely, providing the second image would allow the iMac to start up.

    Flashable ROM - Does that sound like hardware to you? Hmmm I think it does.

    There's a little button on all macs that when you press it allows you to access the open firmware boot ROM - it's pretty cool - you should try it sometime.

    Anywho the open firmware boot ROM must be present for Mac OS to boot - you aren't allowed to copy them & sell them.

    That's why there aren't any clones - otherwise you could install Mac OS on ANY motorola based hardware & it would run. But you can't.

    Why? Boot ROM!

    Anyway her'e the apple TIL article before I forget

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=5 81 79&SaveKCWindowURL=http%3A%2F%2Fkbase.info.apple.c om%2Fcgi-bin%2FWebObjects%2Fkbase.woa%2Fwa%2FSaveK CToHomePage&searchMode=Expert&kbhost=kbase.info.ap ple.com&showButton=false&randomValue=100&showSurve y=true&sessionID=anonymous|148075579

    AND here's a link to some non apple PowerPC based hardware that won't run Mac OS because there ISN'T a boot ROM.

    http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/products/briQ/

    --
    ___________________________
    I'm not a geek, but I play one on TV.
    1. Re:Deploying Clue Stick by TwitchCHNO · · Score: 1

      Here's a nice utility that allows you to put a password on your Open Firmware.

      http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=1 20 095&SaveKCWindowURL=http%3A%2F%2Fkbase.info.apple. com%2Fcgi-bin%2FWebObjects%2Fkbase.woa%2Fwa%2FSave KCToHomePage&searchMode=Assisted&kbhost=kbase.info .apple.com&showButton=false&randomValue=100&showSu rvey=true&sessionID=anonymous|148076290

      If apple was no longer using open firmware boot roms why does this application work on a Dual 867 g4? hmmm?

      --
      ___________________________
      I'm not a geek, but I play one on TV.
    2. Re:Deploying Clue Stick by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      that stick... it hurts. good job.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    3. Re:Deploying Clue Stick by lemkebeth · · Score: 1

      FYI, Sun developed OpenFirmware and it is an open standard that anyone can implement.

      Has a built-in Forth interpreter.

  108. ... about the EUL by revo2001 · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure this guy is actually using Apple hardware, he's just not buying it from Apple. The MB he uses if I'm correct is what Apple uses, the CPU is an upgrade which is fine under the EUL I think.

    --
    revolution // BREEDart.org
  109. Re:No offense... by stanmann · · Score: 1

    Speaking of Mac lovers

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed