Slashdot Mirror


Australia Taps More Phones Than Entire U.S.

An anonymous reader writes "Last year Australian authorities tapped more phones all United States authorities combined. Australian phones were tapped at 20 times the rate of phones in the US according to this article in the Sydney Morning herald. The fact was revealed during a debate in the Australian parliament. The government is attempting to pass new legislation to to make it even easier for the country's domestic spy agency ASIO to tap phones." Update: 09/16 14:07 GMT by T : Julian Assange writes "The Australian is also running the story and has better stats." Thanks for the link.

234 comments

  1. Big Brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ouch. Seems Big Brother is an aussie now.

    1. Re:Big Brother by aivic · · Score: 1

      And us Aussies pay 20 times more for broadband compared to the United States ;)

      Ziggy Ziggy Ziggy, OI OI OI

  2. Old by jaymz168 · · Score: 0

    Isn't this old news? Their government was using it to spy on other parties.

    1. Re:Old by frisket · · Score: 1
      Political parties? Well, the US has a precedent :-)

      Either they have a lot of reds-under-the-beds paranoiacs, or they're using it in criminal investigations (do they have that many crooks?), or it's become a social necessity for the govmnt.

    2. Re:Old by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      As another Aussie who has had my phone tapped, it seems that it's a bit of both. A lot of these are marijuana related. My phone was tapped for about 6-8 weeks after I was picked up with a very small amount. It wasn't enough weed to be charged with an offence, but I found out later than my phone calls had been monitored for a period afterwards. From what I can tell, it's also used as a way do determine if people have been telling the truth, ie: get charged with possession, say you aren't a dealer/robber/criminal/citizen, they listen in for a month or two to make sure. The scary thing (in my opinion) is that in Australia phone tapping will soon replace real detective work, and it will become a matter of blanket monitoring relying on the citizen to incriminate him/herself, instead of normal police procedure. Also, I didn't see it mentioned in the article, but these are all phones, cell, home & payphones. I already know another bloke who was incriminated in a robbery because of his poor choice of words while talking to a friend on his cellphone. It's scary because it's real.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  3. being tapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And being one of those Australians who has been tapped - let me tell you it is not nice.

    Especially when you are innocent.

    1. Re:being tapped by Anonymous+Conrad · · Score: 1

      And being one of those Australians who has been tapped - let me tell you it is not nice. Especially when you are innocent. How did you find out you were being tapped? Was it just an uncomfortable feeling from knowing you'd been tapped, or have you actually had some of your stuff played back to you, etc.?

    2. Re:being tapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you want to take a look at more serious government abuses, take a look at Sweden.

      There is a discussion on www.dumblaws.com->Discussion Forums->Country Laws->Check out Sweden!

      http://www.dumblaws.com/forums/vbulletin/forumdi sp lay.php?s=&forumid=11

    3. Re:being tapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A friend of mine was raided by the Federal Police in full gear. They spent over $1 million ($500,000 $US) trying to get this guy..... And they turned up _nothing_ We found out from a contact in the Federal Police that naturally his phone was tapped, as were all his closer friends (this includes me).

      It disturbes me that I was watched because of guilt by association with someone who was NOT guilty of anything.

    4. Re:being tapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im sure the gestapo wouldve agreed with what you just said

    5. Re:being tapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahahaha, that's a good laugh. Let me guess, you're a conservative living in a big house with pool and keep complaining how darn high taxes are :)

      I think this is the best one:
      Sweden has a history of widespread government theft of private property during the late 70's to late 80's

      Can you give two examples where the evil government took over a company?

      Move to Texas dude

    6. Re:being tapped by kevin+lyda · · Score: 3, Funny

      that's nothing. in america we spent over $30 million investigating one guy over a land deal and ended up barely being able to prove that he lied to people that he had an affair - and that was just because a private citizen illegally recorded some phone conversations.

      as usual we americans are better at everything - including abusing civil liberties. so there.

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    7. Re:being tapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Clinton rump-swab: people went to jail over the Whitewater issue. You are being dishonest. The only reason Hitlery and Bill did not go to jail was because they were in the Whitehouse, had willing accomplices in the media, and were able to bribe enough witnesses into silence, both at the time and later with the promise of presidential pardons (and we saw how ethical Clinton was with his presidential pardons). So go back under your rock.

    8. Re:being tapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention all the killings... those clintons are a tough crowd...

    9. Re:being tapped by Boronx · · Score: 1
      This is the best defense of Ken Starr: the lack of evidence *proves* how ruthless the Clintons were in covering it up.

      And the lack of evidence that Bush is a common thief just proves...wait a minute.

      had willing accomplices in the media

      I wonder if this is the same media that relentlessly attacked Clinton about whitewater year after year? Or maybe you're just talking out of your ass?

      and we saw how ethical Clinton was with his presidential pardons

      And we also saw how Bush (savior v. 2.0) reneged on his promise to release the pardon info. Could it be that there wasn't really a scandal? Or maybe he didn't want people looking into his poppy's pardon of the Iran Contra thugs, and terrorist Orlando Bosch who blew up an airliner (why would a Bush pardon a plane exploding terrorist?). Or does Jr. want to pardon Ken Lay and Dick Cheney without any prying eyes?

      You are a naive buffoon whose got political blinders on. Time to engage that neo-cortex.

    10. Re:being tapped by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Funny

      'twas 70 million plus, actually.

      But it bought us Bush II ! I'm sure the House managers thought it other people's money well spent.

    11. Re:being tapped by Aexia · · Score: 1

      Yes, people went to jail over Whitewater.

      What Fiske, Starr and Ray all discovered was that the Clintons got ripped off. They lost money. I guess the "willing accomplices" in the media forgot to mention that bit.

      And naturally, more money was spent *investigating* Whitewater than was actually *lost* by taxpayers in the whole shebang.

    12. Re:being tapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      liar troll i bet

  4. Oh No by WzDD · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lucky We Live In A Free Country Like America!

    See What Happens When Citizens Give Up Their Guns?

    This Would Never Happen If Australia Had A First Amendment Like The US!

    Just wanted to get those out of the way. Carry on. :-)

    1. Re:Oh No by rchatterjee · · Score: 3, Funny
      not to be too picky about your little rant there but the first amendment is:

      Amendment I

      Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


      I'm pretty sure Australia has most if not all of that somewhere in their constitution as well. What they don't have is something like our second amendment which is:

      Amendment II

      A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


      But i'm just one of those types who is picky about which amendment is which.
    2. Re:Oh No by narkotix · · Score: 0, Troll

      yeah true...we wouldnt be so thick headed like u yanks and have children killing other children like columbine high moron

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    3. Re:Oh No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What!? Is the right to have gun AFTER freedom of speech? Where is the world coming to?

    4. Re:Oh No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot the phone :)

    5. Re:Oh No by Capsaicin · · Score: 2
      [1st Amendment] ... I'm pretty sure Australia has most if not all of that somewhere in their constitution as well.

      Well, no and yes. The Australian Constitution is largely based on the US Constitution, but does not include anything resembling the Bill of Rights. There is no explicit right of free speech written into the Constitution.

      However, in a number of cases, most famously Aust. Capital TV v C'th, the High Court discovered an implicit "Freedom of Political Communication", woven into the fabric of the Constitution, (ie. since the constitution sets up a representative democracy, there must be a presumption of a politically informed electorate, and this implies a right to be informed.)

      Note that this freedom of communication is restricted to political matters ('political' as it relates to the electoral process). It seems unlikely, for example, that a pornograper could argue for constitutional protection under this principle.

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
    6. Re:Oh No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      US Constitution. Slavery.

      QED. Written rights don't mean shit.

  5. Suspicious ... by lushman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think that maybe CIA/FBI statistics are a little less forthcoming than those from ASIO. With all these measures to prevent terrorism, I'd assume that the CIA and FBI combined would be at least 20 times what they were just over a year ago anyway.

    In short: I don't believe it.

    The USA can keep dreaming that they have privacy, but guys, face it - you don't live in the land of the free any more.

    1. Re:Suspicious ... by 1nhuman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I never got the whole big deal about "The Land of The Free". What's so "free" in the states that isn't in any other western country (Canada, Germany, U.K., Sweden, The Netherlands, France, Denmark, Iceland, Belgium, etc.etc.).

      I travel a *lot* and personally I feel more free and more save in Europe then I do in the states, especially in my home country The Netherlands. And that has nothing to do with the 11th. I've felt like this for years.

      Oh btw my favorite country in the world is still New Zealand.

      --
      The glass is half-full. With poison. And there are cracks in the glass. The dirty, dirty glass.
    2. Re:Suspicious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada and the UK have police surveilance video cameras in public locations. That's just not cool. Dunno about Germany/Sweden/Netherlands.

      On the other hand, you're certainly not free from the overbearing state in Sweden.

    3. Re:Suspicious ... by k-0s · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm in total agreement with you. Also has anyone thought that with Carnivore and our (remaining) rights here in America that maybe the CIA/FBI/NSA are just having the Aussies tap the American lines for them so as to prevent all those nasty civil rights violations we always hear in the media? Notice in the article it says "The data also reveals that the number of phone taps used *IN* Australia has increased threefold in four years, and ninefold in just over a decade" and "The Australian figures include *INTERCEPTIONS BY* the National Crime Authority, the Australian Federal Police and state policing agencies, but exclude ASIO." Nowhere does it say these are all domestic taps. I read somewhere thats how our government was getting around those pesky rights of ours, in regards (but not limited) to Carnivore, by having foreign governments do the tapping and keeping their hands clean of the matter. Seeing as how we are close allies with the Aussies it's not hard to believe that any information relavent to a case would be turned over to the American government. In the article it mentions how easy it is to get taps in the country so why go to a local judge when a tribunal half way around the world can get it done alot easier. I know this sounds all Men In Black, super spy, conspiracy theorist but I could have sworn I read about the skirting of our rights in regards to Carnivore on Slashdot a while back.

    4. Re:Suspicious ... by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I never got the whole big deal about "The Land of The Free". What's so "free" in the states that isn't in any other western country (Canada, Germany, U.K., Sweden, The Netherlands, France, Denmark, Iceland, Belgium, etc.etc.).

      I travel a *lot* and personally I feel more free and more save in Europe then I do in the states, especially in my home country The Netherlands. And that has nothing to do with the 11th. I've felt like this for years.


      I agree with you, and I have posted opinions like this to Slashdot before. However, it's best just not to bother posting this type of stuff. You will just get insulted and called communist/ liberal/ socialist/ Eurotrash/ America-hater and whatever. Just don't post this kind of opinion. Lots of Americans just aren't tolerant of it. (Ironic isn't it? For people that go on about freedom of speech so much!)

    5. Re:Suspicious ... by hype7 · · Score: 1
      I think that maybe CIA/FBI statistics are a little less forthcoming than those from ASIO. With all these measures to prevent terrorism, I'd assume that the CIA and FBI combined would be at least 20 times what they were just over a year ago anyway.

      In short: I don't believe it.

      The USA can keep dreaming that they have privacy, but guys, face it - you don't live in the land of the free any more.


      And remember, this was last year. The year when the collective "intelligence" agencies in the US took an absolute beating for failing to catch the biggest terrorist act in history. Politicians, press, public... everyone came down on them like a tonne of bricks!

      If they weren't tapping last year, let me guarantee you they're gonna be tapping left, right and centre this year.

      -- james
    6. Re:Suspicious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is really quite simple, especially if you have seen the film Easy Rider.

      Americans like to talk about individual freedoms, yet they freak out if they ever see a free individual.

      I think it is tied into puritanism -- and homo-erotic sports like football, and professional wrestling. Men aren't allowed to 'like' other men, but they are allowed to 'like' being grabbed by other men.

      It helps keep reality in perspective -- why face the fact that we fund the terrorists we fight when we can pile on top of one another?

    7. Re:Suspicious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada and the UK have police surveilance video cameras in public locations.

      Yeah, I agree. Police who are out walking the street should be blindfold, too. Otherwise the Police* might be watching you, in a public place! Just think, you might be seen doing something illegal and get caught. Oh, the cheek of it all...

      * Replace with "Da Man" if it helps you feel any better.

    8. Re:Suspicious ... by cs668 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Being from Germany and imigrating to the US there are some differences.

      In the US I am free from Church Tax.

      In the US I have freedom of speech and assembly that is far beyone what I would in Germany.

      I was in Germany this summer visiting my family and while I was there they were arresting people for being in a neo-nazi organization. They had commited no crime other than being raving idiots. My point is, in europe they are much more willing to take away free speech rights when they disagree with you than in the US.

      In Germany you also don't have the right to be protected from self-incrimination the way you do in the US.

      I could keep rambling, but it really dosn't matter. The people in europe are OK with the fact that their Govmts are more restrictive, so to bad for them it is their choice.

    9. Re:Suspicious ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I agree with you, and I have posted opinions like this to Slashdot before. However, it's best just not to bother posting this type of stuff. You will just get insulted and called communist/ liberal/ socialist/ Eurotrash/ America-hater and whatever. Just don't post this kind of opinion. Lots of Americans just aren't tolerant of it. (Ironic isn't it? For people that go on about freedom of speech so much!)
      Free speech != keeping your mouth shut when someone says something you disagree with. Quite the opposite.

      That being said, as an American, I cringe at those comments you're talking about, because free speech also doesn't mean that you should shoot your mouth off without thinking every time someone presses your buttons. And anyone who uses words like "commie" or "eurotrash" in serious conversation is, by definition, not worth paying attention to.

      Anyway ... It's true that now many European countries have just as much freedom as the US. But you've got to look at the historical background. At the time of the War of 1812 (when the lines "land of the free and home of the brave" were written) every other great power in the world was a monarchy (unles you want to argue that France under Napoleon was somehow less a monarchy than the rest of Europe under traditional dynasties; I wouldn't.) Ironically, the only other great power in the world that could lay claim to anything approaching the degree of freedom the US offered in those days was Britain, which was slowly approaching a de facto democracy even then. But the idea of the US as uniquely free was really quite accurate then, and it was burned into our national consciousness.

      I'm the child and grandchild of immigrants, and I've lived outside the US for substantial periods of time; I know that we're not all there is to the world, and that there are many other places in the world that offer a very good life. I am also a veteran and a patriot; I love my country and hope that it will retain its historical role as a beacon of freedom in a world where too many are oppressed. That's why current trends, both in the US and throughout the free world, scare the shit out of me.
      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    10. Re:Suspicious ... by lightcycler · · Score: 1

      You can connect to your partner's computer using a modem and a copy of PGP-Fone. You will need a mic/speaker and soundcard, which most computers already have, or you can by a telephone handset which plugs into your soundcard.

      You can either phone your friend directly and have their modem ready to answer it (PGP-Fone running and waiting for the call), or you can establish an internet connection if you're both connected and know each others' IP addresses.

    11. Re:Suspicious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue that (for Germany, inparticular), some of that willingness to take away liberties is a result of history there. It's an effort to stop another war, in short.

      The German anti-Nazi law is a result of Mcarthyism as much as anything. It's the same reason that Japan can no longer have an emperor, under law. They are merely laws to keep you people sane. That's all.

      Having said all that, the Church Tax is pretty goddamn stupid, as is the Radio and Tele Tax. Pretty Pathetic.

    12. Re:Suspicious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone has a bad case of USA Envy. Don't worry I am sure your euro/yen/candian currency will eventually improve to allow you to buy the lastest Britney album...

    13. Re:Suspicious ... by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 1


      None of us live anywhere truly 'free' anymore. The main thing we have going for us in the United States is the ultimate check and balance - private firearms ownership.

      I think it's time to break out the belt-fed this weekend. :)

    14. Re:Suspicious ... by njdj · · Score: 1

      At the time of the War of 1812....the only other great power in the world that could lay claim to anything approaching the degree of freedom the US offered...

      I take it you are not black. Your choice of 1812 is particularly unfortunate, because one of the (several) causes of that war was the Royal Navy's attempts to stop the slave trade. If you think the USA was a bastion of freedom in the 19th century, I suggest you read Uncle Tom's Cabin. Harriet Beecher Stowe did not agree with you.

    15. Re:Suspicious ... by aengblom · · Score: 2
      I think that maybe CIA/FBI statistics are a little less forthcoming than those from ASIO. With all these measures to prevent terrorism, I'd assume that the CIA and FBI combined would be at least 20 times what they were just over a year ago anyway.
      In short: I don't believe it.
      The USA can keep dreaming that they have privacy, but guys, face it - you don't live in the land of the free any more.

      In other words:
      If the data doesn't line up with your ideology. You must discount it. Sure, be skeptical, but just because U.S. is bad, doesn't mean it's the worst.

      Australia can keep dreaming that they have privacy, but guys, face it -- you don't live in the land of the free any more either

      *Officially bored of the blanket bash U.S. policy. Please provide facts, figures and fair comparisons between other countries.
      --


      So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    16. Re:Suspicious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you have no clue.

      That war was about power and money. Slavery may have have entered into it. But not from the history books I used. It would have entered in only from the british side as a way to cut off supplies. Not as a humane gesture.

      It was about the british trying to reexert its will upon the united states. They had just got booted out a few years earlier and were spoiling for a rematch. There were several lootings, piracy, and ships sunk, before war was declared. It fairly well ended up in a stalemate.

      I suggest you not take your history from fiction. If that were the case we all live in the matrix and agent smith is out to get us all. I am not belittling that book. But if that is where you get your history. Your view of history is not correct. That book shows a small segment of what was going on. You may want to actually go look at what kicked that war off. There are many excelent sites on the web. try http://www.militaryheritage.com/1812.htm

    17. Re:Suspicious ... by BinxBolling · · Score: 2
      I travel a *lot* and personally I feel more free and more save in Europe then I do in the states, especially in my home country The Netherlands. And that has nothing to do with the 11th. I've felt like this for years.

      "Feeling" free is an awfully vague statement. How many situations have you been in where your freedom was genuinely put to the test? For example, have you ever been charged with a crime in any of these countries?

      Partly you feel more 'free' in the Netherlands and in Europe because those places are more like home to you. I'm from the southern US, and I certainly feel a bit more 'free' there than I do in NYC, where I live. While there are some differences in the laws of those two places, they aren't large, and if anything, the laws down south are more restrictive.

    18. Re:Suspicious ... by Squalish · · Score: 1

      You're right, the british offered freedom from slavery to blacks who would join up/revolt in both the Revolution and 1812.

      I was talking about the result of 1812 with a british friend the other day, about how it ended in a stalemate, and then he pointed out that London wasn't burned to the ground. The fact that the war was fought in North America and only on our side of the Atlantic shows just who won.

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
    19. Re:Suspicious ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "*Officially bored of the blanket bash U.S. policy. Please provide facts, figures and fair comparisons between other countries."

      Good luck. Who needs facts when you have articles of faith?

  6. Good luck to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're welcome to our line. I admire anyone that could stand more than 5 minutes of listening to the crap that my sister speaks about all day long on the phone.

    1. Re:Good luck to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what does she talk about?

    2. Re:Good luck to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She likes to talk about my pipe in her mouth

    3. Re:Good luck to them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A short conversation then.

  7. I submitted this 30 years ago by HacTar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Silly. What did you think seti was for?
    To spy ET phone home..

  8. Big deal by Basje · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live in the Netherlands (pop 15 million, about as much as NYC) and the police over here taps more phones than the whole of the US.

    It's not as much the phone taps that are in place that worry me. It's the taps that should be there and that are prevented by corrupt officials.

    Land of the free. Yeah sure, but only when you've bought your local politician/whatever.

    --
    the pun is mightier than the sword
    1. Re:Big deal by bengen · · Score: 1

      I live in the Netherlands (pop 15 million, about as much as NYC) and the police over here taps more phones than the whole of the US.

      Same thing here in Germany. I suspect that each European country (well, what about the UK?) taps more phone calls than the US. Probably because we had our terrorism experience 30 years ago.

    2. Re:Big deal by trevsta · · Score: 2, Informative

      erm, you do realise that Australia only has a population of around 18 million?

      So therefore, it is still a big deal

    3. Re:Big deal by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      I am dutch as well and I doubt the level of truth is Basje's claims. The dutch police largely consists of "Melkert banen", or goverment subsidized jobs for long-term unemployed people (read: mostly lazy bastards). This, combined with the fact the dutch police is largely corrupt (at least those that I know, personally.) makes me doubt that our police actually manages to crank out more phone taps then the US. Maybe the dutch version of the CIA, called the BVD, might be able to do something, but not on that scale.

    4. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just nit-picking.

      NYC is big, but we have a population of only ~8 million people. If you include the suburbs of Nassau County, Westchester County, and Northern New Jersey, you _might_ be pushing 15M.

    5. Re:Big deal by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, not only that, I can walk into Washington Square and get black market cigarettes free of the new $5.00 cigarette tax as well as a nice dime bag of weed or a $20 bag of heroin no problem.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  9. Big Cobber? by alnapp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    1984X?

    1. Re:Big Cobber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was pretty funny, but I don't think many will get it. Too bad!

  10. US Gov too busy by svindler · · Score: 1

    They are probably all too busy tapping us foreigners, so they don't have the time to tap themselves.
    Besides, when you've heard one yankee, you've heard them all.

    1. Re:US Gov too busy by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
      Yup, you're onto it.

      After bugdget cuts, the Oz spies could no longer afford international calls so they spy on their own folk instead.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
  11. Echelon... by kinko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Echelon makes this kind of irrelevant. The 5 countries that are part of Echelon (US, UK, Canada, Australia, and NZ) can basically listen in on ANY phone call/fax/email/IP etc in any of the other countries. There are some computers here in New Zealand that are directly controlled by the US (NSA I think). This means that the NZ govt (and Aust govt etc) can listen to US phone calls. Now part of the reason it is set up like this is that the US authorities can use the NZ bit of the network to listen to US calls. This way it is technically not "domestic spying" as it is occurring over here.

    I guess the wiretaps they're talking about here are for court-issued wiretaps for the police, rather than the secret services.

    1. Re:Echelon... by k-0s · · Score: 1

      I knew I wasn't losing my mind when I posted this basically when you were also typing your response. Thanks for proving to me (and others by default) that I'm not a loony (or at least the only one)

    2. Re:Echelon... by kinko · · Score: 1

      Google for Nicky Hager, an activist over here who made a lot of details public in a book a few years ago.

    3. Re:Echelon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason Australia seems so high is that all of the phone calls tapped under Echelon are included in this report.

  12. What now? by jobbleberry · · Score: 1

    How will I go about conspiring with my terrorist buddies now. It's getting harder to be a sleeper agent in the asia pacific region. Looks we will will have to go back to pidgeons.

  13. Telling quote. by Camel+Racer · · Score: 3, Funny
    I found the quote
    The spokeswoman said the Australian figures reflected the "increasing sophistication of criminals and their use of new technology".
    especially telling.

    Guess that explains everything. The crooks, labor organizers, and opposition, have mastered the "sophistication" of the telephone.

    --
    Anybody can work under ideal circumstances. -- Jeff K. (January 4, 2001)
    1. Re:Telling quote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think 'criminals' refers to the people tapping the lines, which is more sophisticated than placing a call.

    2. Re:Telling quote. by tuxedo-steve · · Score: 1

      The crooks, labor organizers, and opposition, have mastered the "sophistication" of the telephone.

      Sigh. It'd be funny if it weren't true.

      --
      - SMJ - (It's not just a name: it's a bad aftertaste.)
  14. so that means by Gabrill · · Score: 1

    the ratio of tapped phones to population must be tremendous. Theres only what? 20,000,000 people in Australia?

    --
    Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    1. Re:so that means by danamania · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a far larger amount certainly, but of a fairly small number.

      To recap, Australia did 2150 taps in 19million people, the US did 1490 taps on 284 million.

      For Australia, that's about one in 10,000 people, compared to about one in 200,000 people for the US

      a grrl & her server

    2. Re:so that means by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      And therefore, Aussies are 20 times more likely to be criminals, or even worse, subversives?

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    3. Re:so that means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And therefore, Aussies are 20 times more likely to be criminals, or even worse, subversives?

      I can say that it is not just criminals and subversives that get tapped in .au.

      They're looking to identify friends and foes.

      (And that's all I'm going to say, even as an AC. Figure out why for yourself.)

      BTW, does anyone actually believe any numbers they read about stuff like this? ; )

  15. Re:Even theo now uses Solaris. Openbsd is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    He can't even trust his own OS. What a schmuck.

  16. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A typical ignorant comment made by a typical ignorant Yank, and seeing as you posted as anon, then it shows your enthusiasm for being known... then so will I.

  17. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, you must be an American.

  18. Does Australia have a constitution? by tgma · · Score: 1

    Not trying to be funny, or anything, but isn't Australia in the same position as the UK, in that it doesn't have a written constitution? Just a network of constitutional laws and acts, and a supporting set of court judgements that delineate the powers of the state. I apologize for my ignorance, but if Australia is in the same position as the UK, then there is a problem with constitional rights, because there is nowhere that these rights are explicitly stated.
    For instance, with regard to freedom of speech, the UK government can use something called a D-notice to suppress press reports that it doesn't like, although there has been a lot of controversy about this, and I think that the use of this power is limited by the courts. I don't claim to be a big expert on this.
    I live in Russia, and used to work for a multilateral organisation here. We were always happy that our phones were bugged, because then the Russians might actually believe that we meant the advice that we gave them.

    1. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by bukharin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, Australia has a constitution!

      http://www.dpmc.gov.au/docs/constitution.cfm

    2. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by darkov2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, we do have one. See http://www.chanrobles.com/australia.htm I think what you're reffering to in part is the Common Law, which we have adopted along with many other English conventions.

    3. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      For instance, with regard to freedom of speech, the UK government can use something called a D-notice to suppress press reports that it doesn't like

      As I understand it D-notices was/is a somewhat bizarre scheme, a kind of gentleman's agreement between newspaper editors and the Department of Defense whereby the DoD would supply the newspaper editors with privilaged access to certain information if they agreed not to publish it. It wasn't a legal thing as far as I am aware - the editors could (and some did) tell the DoD to stuff their D-notices.

      With regards to freedom of speech in the UK it is something that is pretty fundamental. For instance UK journalists and newscasters are really hard questioners and don't give politicians an easy time in the way they do in many countries...

    4. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 2, Funny
      For instance UK journalists and newscasters are really hard questioners and don't give politicians an easy time in the way they do in many countries...

      Let's see, we have:

      • Johnny Vaughan.
      • Richard and Judy.
      • Martin Bashir.

      On the other hand we also have

      • Peter Snow
      • Jeremy Paxman
      • Ali G :-)

      Hmm, depends who the politicians pick to interview them...

    5. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmmm. I don't think I would call Johnny Vaughan, Richard and Judy or Ali G news journalists.

      Mind you, I remember Ali G asking Edward Heath if she ever fancied giving Thatcher a quickie, which is a pretty tough question...

    6. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by Proquar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, Australia's constitution came into effect on 1 Jan 1901 - the day we federated. So it was quite a significant day. It established and defined the relationship between the all states. It took a long time to develop - and was done by a group of clear-thinking, diverse people in a fiery debate - where no one got killed.

      (People often walked out, but no one got killed. And the process went for years) until finally the fiction that is the Australian constitution was born. Somehow, we managed to develop a Clayton's monarchy, (the monarchy you have when you're not having a monarchy).

      And now lots of people want to change the constitution - because of this very clever fiction. But I'm sure in the process they'll remove a lot of the freedoms that are currently afforded to Australian's if they are allowed to change it one iota. Then we won't be able to walk down the street with the right to be free from fear of drive-by shootings and there will proabably be more allowances and less restrictions phone tappings by incompetent organisations like ASIO.

      If ASIO were so good at tapping phones, how come the newspaper knows about it? Is it just me, or is the real story - we know about more Aussies having their phones tapped than we know about American phones being tapped?

      Now the CIA, there's an agency that really knows where its towel is (and how to keep its phone-tapping under wraps).

      --
      ---- *dog sitting next to a computer, with his beady eyes shifting left to right*
    7. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by Cyberdyne · · Score: 3, Interesting
      As I understand it D-notices was/is a somewhat bizarre scheme, a kind of gentleman's agreement between newspaper editors and the Department of Defense whereby the DoD would supply the newspaper editors with privilaged access to certain information if they agreed not to publish it. It wasn't a legal thing as far as I am aware - the editors could (and some did) tell the DoD to stuff their D-notices.

      No. It involves the Offical Secrets Act, and basically amounts to "information about the theft of that anthrax from Porton Down is classified. If you tell anyone about it, we'll lock you up." There's a specific exemption to our Freedom of Expression for "national security" - basically, the Ministry of Defence (MoD; DoD is the US version) can just turn up and gag you on any matter they feel like. They can't gag you about, say, a politician screwing his secretary, but anything military or relating to the security services is another matter: just ask David Shayler...

      (The theft I mention was actually referred to by one paper at the time: the British lab at Porton Down was broken into, and had three things stolen - one being a sample of Foot and Mouth, another being Anthrax. For some strange reason, it wasn't referred to again...)

    8. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by plugger · · Score: 1

      Remembering back to high school English lessons, we were taught that a D-Notice could not prevent publication of information. It is a threat which will be activated *after* the information is published. IIRC, the consequences could include closing down the publication in question.

    9. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by pubjames · · Score: 3, Informative


      No. It involves the Offical Secrets Act,[..]

      Nope, I think I was correct in my orginal post. From the official web site (www.dnotice.org.uk):

      "The DA-Notices are intended to provide to national and provincial newspaper editors, to periodicals editors, to radio and television organisations and to relevant book publishers, general guidance on those areas of national security which the Government considers it has a duty to protect. The Notices, together with a General Introduction, details of the Committee and how to contact the Secretary, are widely distributed to editors, producers and publishers and also to officials in Government departments, military commanders, chief constables and some institutions. The Notices have no legal standing and advice offered within their framework may be accepted or rejected partly or wholly."

      I have also read an opinion piece about D-Notices by the editor of a national publication (I don't remember which), in which he said he basically ignored them. It is a system that apparently used to work - when it was a gentlemen's agreement type thing - but doesn't really any more.

    10. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by carlfish · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I really hope you were trolling. I'll bite anyway.

      The Australian Constitution does not guarantee us any freedoms at all. If you read it, it's all about how power is divided between the State and Federal governments and the Governor General. There's no Bill of Rights, no guarantees of anything for the citizens save the right to vote in elections. Australian governments can pass any oppressive legislation they want.

      We do have a pretty lame kind of freedom of speech, but you won't find it anywhere in the constitution. That's because the High Court invented it out of nowhere in the late 80's. It was an interesting case - the government of the day tried to pass a law restricting spending on political advertisements, the TV companies sued, and a one-judge majority in the High Court decided that we had a "freedom of political speech" implied in the constitution. In other words, "It's not there, but it should be so we'll pretend it is." The logic they used was tenuous to say the least.

      Being a High Court decision, and a narrow majority, it could be overruled any time.

      So there's no wonder we have more phone-taps than the USA. They have constitutional protection against unreasonable search, all we have is a Common Law doctrine of evidence that will mostly (but not always) suppress evidence that was illegally obtained.

      Charles Miller

      (Who isn't a lawyer, but did pass Constitutional Law before he dropped out of University to become a programmer)

      --
      The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.
    11. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to troll the point, but... Isn't that more or less to be expected from a country colonized by criminals?

    12. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by spress · · Score: 1

      If we were colonized by criminals I would expect more freedoms rather than less. Instead this is the result of being colonised by gaolers (to use the english spelling), the criminals were just along for the ride. As has been noted elsewhere, Australia has very few legislated rights and freedoms. We don't even have the right to arm bears.

      --
      Subverting the meta-moderating system since 2003
    13. Re:Does Australia have a constitution? by Proquar · · Score: 2, Funny

      What do you mean... it protected the Franklin River, didn't it? :P
      Have you seen The Castle? It protected those guys too - it's the vibe of the thing - really!

      It's not a bad old bird, really - and it allows changes as is appropriate, rather than being a document spawned in a civil war with no room to grow... It ain't perfect - but it ain't bad either.

      (I'm having fun, but not trolling :)

      --
      ---- *dog sitting next to a computer, with his beady eyes shifting left to right*
  19. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuk you uncle tom nigger, atleast our country isn't built on the backs of slaves

  20. Re:This makes sense by charlemange · · Score: 0

    How did this ever get modded in?

    Slashdot is really taking a dive if this is the level of comment considered commendable.

  21. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LMAO !!! you guys sound like someone just yanked the chain of a hundred dogs all at once. c'mon, get over it. history is past tense, can't be changed, should be lived with or ignored if necessary. peace

  22. echelon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does that include phone tapping on europeans with echelon?
    fucking americans...

    1. Re:echelon? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about it. The whole point of Echelon is that you can't spy on your own people. So they spy on us, we spy on them. Share the data and you've just gotten around your peoples civil rights without breaking the law. Wouldn't your mama be proud...

  23. don't feel too good about this... by g4dget · · Score: 2

    I kind of doubt US government agencies could give an accurate accounting of how many phones they have tapped if they wanted to, and they probably don't even want to. And "tapped" probably doesn't take into account any kind of monitoring and audio keyword search that isn't aimed at a specific person.

  24. hmm.. i wonder.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what happens when people are having phone sex..

    guy: oooh baby.. give it to me.. right now

    wire tapper: hmm.. this might seem interesting.. they may be exchanging something

    girl: oh my god.. i'm coming! i'm coming!

    wire tapper: raid his house now! they're up to something..

    eh.. a stupid thought, nonetheless, always a possible situation :-)

  25. They must have really low crime rates... by ceeam · · Score: 1

    ... if cops have nothing to do except listening to other people's phone talks.

  26. Re:This makes sense by narkotix · · Score: 1

    and america consists of gun tooting wankers who think that their right to have a gun (in their constitution) is because the king of england (yes i know we have a queen) MIGHT invade.....hows that for paranoia :-)

    --
    We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
  27. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe Australia hasn't a so high crime rate or shouldn't fear about being attacked by terrorists like other countries. I miss the whole point here. Why a government should take away its citizens privacy and freedom for no apparent reason?

    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To get reelected.

    2. Re:Why? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why a government should take away its citizens privacy and freedom for no apparent reason?

      They aren't, relativly speaking. All they are doing is admitting how many taps they used. If only other governments would follow suit...

    3. Re:Why? by NotZed · · Score: 1
      Australia hasn't a so high crime rate or shouldn't fear about being attacked by terrorists like other countries.

      Note if you believe John "Dubya" Howard, who seems to be hell bent on positioning Australia as far in front of the US as he can, and making terrorism against Australia a reality.

      --
      _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
      \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
  28. Just not so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are phone-taps which have come under the gaze of the law. Most phone taps are done by intelligence agencies, which can and do operate outside of normal legal constraints. Something like Echelon isn't just to pick up Espn.

  29. The Australian is also running the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    We're bugged more than US By Duncan Macfarlane September 16, 2002

    POLICE are being given authority to tap telephone conversations at
    such an unprecedented rate that Australians are 20 times more likely
    to be bugged than Americans. But despite the rate of tapping
    increasing ninefold over the past decade, the ability of Australian
    authorities to secure convictions as a result of listening to
    telephone calls is lower than in the US.

    In the past four years alone, the number of phone-tap warrants
    approved by the courts and the Administrative Appeals Tribunal has
    tripled from 675 to 2157 - one-third more than all state and federal
    taps approved in the US.

    In contrast to the US, our national security authorities, including
    the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation, do not
    publish statistics of their bugs.

    The extent of the tapping has prompted federal Labor justice
    spokesman Daryl Melham to call for a new body to oversee the use
    of phone taps by Australian police, possibly based on a model used
    in Britain , which has a chief surveillance commissioner.

    "There is an urgent need to strengthen the resources available for
    external scrutiny of telephone interception activities and other
    forms of intrusive surveillance," Mr Melham said.

    Labor analysis shows that only seven of the 2164 police applications
    for interception warrants were rejected by the courts last year.
    Since 1999, when Administrative Appeals Tribunal officers were
    first given power to issue warrants, numbers have increased sharply.

    AAT officers now issue 94 per cent of all warrants, Family Court
    judges 5 per cent, and Supreme Court judges only 1 per cent.

    The Australian Council of Civil Liberties said the explosion in
    warrants showed that police were forum shopping and targeting
    sympathetic judicial officers.

    Cameron Murphy, secretary of the council, demanded the federal
    Government publish more detailed information to reveal if a handful
    of judges and officials were responsible for most of the warrants.

    "We think Australians would be aghast if they knew so many people's
    phone conversations were being bugged," Mr Murphy said.

    Labor also warned that Australian police were achieving far fewer
    criminal convictions per phone tap than US authorities.

    Between 1996 and 2001, US police made 3.31 arrests and secured 1.55
    convictions for each phone tap.

    Over the same period Australian agencies made only 0.63 arrests
    per phone tap and 0.46 convictions.

    A spokesman for Mr Melham said technological advances were part of
    the reason for the explosion in tapping.

    All telecommunications providers were now required to construct
    their facilities so that police could tap phones centrally instead
    of climbing telegraph poles.

  30. Re:This makes sense by Jondor · · Score: 1

    But then again, all the other (religiouse) nuts europe wanted to get rit of went to america.. explains a few things too..;-)

    (ok, now, where are my asbest undies...)

    --
    Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!
  31. Phone tapping en masse is wrong by dazdaz · · Score: 1

    I think phone tapping en masse is wrong, and should only be used in the most severe of circumstances. Phone tapping people as hoc, or because their the wrong shade of blue or *may* be doing something that's unethical or perhaps illegal sets a very bad precedent.

    So we trust the government through the election process, they should trust us, if trust is taken away from our society, then what's left?

  32. Re:Aren't Australians All Descended From Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New Zealand has a higher crime rate than Australia.

  33. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but how many planes have they had fly into their buldings, killing 1,000s'?

    1. Re:but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, you have to ask just _how_many_ terrorists have actually been caught by a tap. They know the phones are a huge risk, so they avoid direct contact. They know e-mail gets routinely scanned, so they use encryption.

      This level of spying by the government is aimed at the ordinary citizen. They don't want to tap your phone/mail all the time, but they want the option available to them when they need it.

  34. 20x US phone taps? by red_flea · · Score: 1
    You wanna know what's even worse? Look at this...

    Australia "officially" tapped 2150 phones and has a population of about 20 million, roughly 1 tap per 10k people.

    The U.S. "officially" tapped 1490 phones and has a pop. of 280 million... That's about 1 tap per 187k people.

    Of course, I'd bet my nest egg that the U.S. does more unofficial taps than Australia, so the real rate is probably something barely less shocking. But fear the day lawmakers point to this and say, "We're not doing enough phone taps!"

  35. But... But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But CNN told me that Bush is taking away all my freedoms! Those damn Ozies can't beat us at this. I *demand* that the US tap every phone now!

    I'm writing Barbara Boxer to inform her of this crisis.

  36. Oh my gawd -- guess what happened to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Last night I was lying in bed trying to get to sleep when I thought I heard a strange noise coming from the bathroom.

    Knowing that I wouldn't be able to doze off until the mystery was solved, I hauled by sad ass out of bed and stumbled down the hall to the "little room"

    At first I thought it must just be tinnitus because the sound was really indistinct and seemed to be coming from multiple directions at once.

    After a few minutes walking around the bathroom with my hands cupped to my ears I finally traced the source of the noise to the basin.

    Yes, those bastard law-enforcement officials -- they'd phoned my tap!

  37. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, what a fucking joke.

    To all the morons saying that I'm from America: I'm not. I'm from the Netherlands. What I wrote was a JOKE. Guess what, that was the reason it was modded funny! Some people actually understand humour!

    What a bunch of clowns you are.

  38. So does Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does Germany

  39. releif by tanveer1979 · · Score: 3, Funny

    so ggod in living in a developing country .. our phones dont work half of the time whew ;-)

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:releif by sn00perz · · Score: 0

      too bad yor internet seems to be workinf fine.. im so tired of competing with %^$^% indians who do programming for $5/hour

      --

      Down with Crapitali$m. Anarchy NOW!
    2. Re:releif by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The do some programming that requires some actual brains and isn't in Java. (not a racist statement. There are tons of very intelligent Indian programmers. Most of them move to the US, and none of them work for $5 an hour).

  40. but hey ... (/. joke coming ...) by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    ... at least the Aussie's have better high-tech wireless phones than the US ...

    Thank you, I'll be here all week ... :) remember to tip your waitress ...

  41. New zealand's crime rate by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    This was front page news in Taranaki, New Zealand for days!. Somehow seems less violent than where I live now. NZ front page news

  42. Re:This makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey now.

    How would you like it if the King of England came over to you and started getting in your face?

    Oh wait, you're British, aren't you?

    Erm. Well, I bet you still wouldn't like it!

  43. It's an ancient story. by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    Whenever a country experiences a surge in crime, (because of a bad economy or new methods by crooks or a new street drug) it runs the risk of a major backlash in the form of draconian punishments, abolition of civil liberties, and sometimes vigilantism. The backlash never solves the problem, which means it can repeat itself again and again. The appearance of crack cocaine in America caused the public to tolerate aggressive tactics by the DEA and then by other TLAs, culminating in Waco. Europe and Australia now tolerate promiscuous phone tapping. Britain is almost a panopticon now, and is loosening regulations on psychiatric commitment. Eternal vigilance, folks. Nothing else suffices.

  44. Re:ARE YOU OR HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A TERRORIST, SIR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nope - I'm a uni student studying IT however.

  45. Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's amusing to count how many people have somehow blamed this on the U.S.

  46. pffft - security? by POds · · Score: 0

    I dont find this a bad thing. I mean, they are only going to bug those who think are doing some pretty bad shit!! As long as i stay in ASIO's "good books" - i shall not even worry about it.

    Plus, what i dont know doesnt hurt me :)

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  47. Monkey See Monkey Do by Self+Bias+Resistor · · Score: 2

    Looks like our little Johnny Howard has been following the lead of the US more than we first imagined. I'd imagine he'll be constructing the Aussie version of the PATRIOT Act next. Depressing and, at the same time, completely unsuprising.

    --

    ----------
    When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer our friend.

    1. Re:Monkey See Monkey Do by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Mate, this has been going on longer than since John-boy's been in office. I (and some friends) were blanket-monitored for the first time in 1995 and then again in 1997. What I find unsurprising, however, is that at least this government had the decency to tell us, not like the previous party.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    2. Re:Monkey See Monkey Do by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 2

      It's ok. Howard can destroy our rights all he likes. As long as there are some Little Yellow People to distract and blame for our ills, we'll keep voting for him (my, isn't he tough and strong!). Well I don't... but your average Aussie is still racist.

      No War!

      --
      * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
    3. Re:Monkey See Monkey Do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure if the CIA already replaced the Australian Prime Minister Howard with a Brown Noser. Seems Howard wanted to lick Bush but got shat on instead! (No shit. MP Mark Latham called him as asslicker on National TV.)

  48. Re:Aren't Australians All Descended From Criminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, aparently more convicts were sent to the USA than Oz, so...

  49. More great editing by /. by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

    "Last year Australian authorities tapped more phones all United States authorities combined."

    Good job editors.

    Dirk

  50. Instant revenge against tappers... by CrazyDuke · · Score: 2

    Call some random person...

    *ring* *ring* *ring*

    "Hello?"

    "The secret website is goatse.cx!"

    "Huh?"

    *click*

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  51. Inadmissable as evidence by Goonie · · Score: 2
    You're quite right, this is discussing court-issued wiretaps (however, the court they're issued by is a fairly low-level court).
    U

    nauthorised wiretapping by intelligence agencies is kinda nasty, but they can't use it to convict you (directly).

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  52. Note the source... by Goonie · · Score: 2
    This report came from FOI requests made by the Opposition (the minority party), who are opposing further extensions to wiretapping laws.

    These bills are thus likely to fail in the Senate, as the opposition is opposing the bill and the green-left minor parties that hold the balance of power were *never* going to vote in favour of it.

    This is (at last) a somewhat politically courageous action by the opposition, because standing up for civil liberties is rarely politically advantagous and will run the risk of the government accusing them of risking Australia's national security or some such nonsense. Kudos to Labor for actually showing a little backbone.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  53. Big Brother watching by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

    Big brother watching them, lol, that sucks!
    that will lead to even higher demand of crypted communications for criminals(or just for people who want to discuss only with whom they are talking, and not also with some goverment agency) there.

    So there would probably be some market for phones crypting you'r talk so that goverment agencies cannot decrypt it, perhaps i should take out my soldering iron and a pile of electronic junk like processors, eeproms, microphone, speaker...
    i wonder how easy it would have been to make a phone like that =D perhaps at same time you could implement a button when pressed would mutate your voice also...
    That would need a lot of processing power to first translate you'r voice from analogic to digital and incoming voice from digital and analogic and also crypting & decrypting it.
    i mean a lot of processing power compared to some pic processors etc... actually it's merely nothing needed but a lot for small electronic gadgets...
    perhaps somebody should start making such a device?

    I'm glad i don't need to worry about somebody tapping my phone, if i remember right here they need atleast to inform the tapped person that they are tapping...
    also there is a market share for devices detecting phone tapping...

    Cybernetic Zombie's Network

    1. Re:Big Brother watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digital encryption of voice in real time exists, and is in use by one Australian security body I am aware of (naval intelligence). ASIS and ASIO probably use a similar technology. The hard part is not the encryption itself, which can be done with an appropriate DSP, but ensuring rolling-key syncronization between the encoder and decoder. Most of this stuff was covered in Electronics & Wireless World (sorry, no URL) about ten years ago IIRC, so the processing power requirements aren't that great.

      I understand it is, however, illegal to use the phone network for encrypted messages without legislative dispensation (Telecommunications Devices act).

      Also, any device connecting to a phone line has to be approved by Austel, which I don't think they'll be in any hurry to do.

    2. Re:Big Brother watching by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      i didn't know those will need to be approved by Austel (i do not live in australia, and actually i don't know is it needed here) Also there isn't such devices for consumer market, but for home 'engineer' it would be perhaps a tough job to make and find appropriate cpu's etc... i knew that cpu requirements aren't that big but can a simple pic processor handle it, no. and how to find an appropriate DSP?

    3. Re:Big Brother watching by NotZed · · Score: 1
      Yes it will need to be approved by Austel. Anything you plug into the phone line physically needs to be approved. Primarily it is for electrical isolation, safety, and interference reasons.

      However, an accoustic coupler, or just using VoIP through an approved modem does not require any 'approval', so its not a practical limitation.

      --
      _ // `Thinking is an exercise to which all too few brains
      \\/ are accustomed' - First Lensman
    4. Re:Big Brother watching by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

      so we have a solution, time to start making software =)
      so we use VoIP, eachh side having a modem and we crypt that VoIP channel...i just wonder how it would be most easiest achieved... should it be just a normal modem call to net, i mean in similar fashion, sametime creating a network... nawh, then internet should be used probably...
      well i don't actually care, it is not my problem, somebody else can make a practical solution =D

  54. Makes sense to me by paiute · · Score: 1

    otherwise we'd have our enemies finding out how those crooked sticks come back when you throw them or how those hollow stick make those cool sounds

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  55. Constitution but no bill of rights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most democratic countries have a constitution but lack a Bill of Rights. I think this is why allegedly "free" countries like Britain and Australia have so much trouble with government infringement on civil liberties like property ownership, privacy, gun ownership, speech and so forth.

    I've seen a few lame attempts at establishing a Bill of Rights in other countries. But none of them are taken seriously by their respective governments and most of them are written so they can mean anything the politicians want them to mean. South Africa's new constitution, for example, is one of the more hilarious documents I've read lately.

    Galland

    1. Re:Constitution but no bill of rights? by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      England does have a Bill of Rights (originally titled "An Act Declaring the Rights and Liberties of the Subject and Settling the Succession of the Crowne,") passed in 1688.

  56. not so bad by claude_juan · · Score: 1

    maybe this is naive, but who cares if your phone is tapped? you should be ok with it so long as you have nothing to hide. i know all you paranoid folk out there believe the govt will frame you, but jees. give me a break. if you are clean, just let it go.

    1. Re:not so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I should have no expectation of privacy in my own home? Then why shouldn't there be cameras in every home? If you aren't doing anything wrong, you don't need to worry. And why shouldn't the press' freedom be stripped from it? After all, only criminals benefit from free speech.

      I have rights guaranteed to me by the constitution of this state. I will fight for those rights. Were the constitution to be amended tomorrow, I would rise up with all the force I could muster and continue the fight.

    2. Re:not so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be serious. Those are people listening to your phone -- your words are subject to mistakes of interpretation, etc. You're relying on some over worked character's good will.

      Are you really willing to allow *anyone* to listen to and interpret your words? You pointy haired boss? The jerk down the street? Or even those who have the power to put you on some kind of *list*.

  57. Urm you sure you're Dutch ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There isn't a single Dutch Police officer hired as a subsidized worker (now known as ID-jobs, formerly known as Melkert jobs). Only "stads- en parkeerwachten" (unarmed "officers" patrolling city centres and writing parking tickets, with no other authorities, they cannot even make an arrest, they have to call the real cops).

    The BVD (Binnenlandse Veiligheidsdient: Internal Security Service), is best compared with the NSA, not the CIA, as the BVD isn't allowed to spy abroad.

    You sure you're Dutch?? If you are, you're showing the same level of ignorance, usually bestowed upon our American brethren. Just goes to show that everything is the same on both sides of the pond.

    1. Re:Urm you sure you're Dutch ... by TheGreek · · Score: 2
      The BVD (Binnenlandse Veiligheidsdient: Internal Security Service), is best compared with the NSA, not the CIA, as the BVD isn't allowed to spy abroad.


      That would make them comparable to the FBI. Neither the CIA nor NSA is allowed to handle domestic spying. That's why everybody got their knickers in a knot when Nixon had the CIA tell the FBI to stop looking into Watergate because of "the Bay of Pigs" invasion.
  58. Shouldn't that read.. by _LORAX_ · · Score: 2

    Australia Taps More Phones -LEGALLY- Than Entire U.S.

    Since even those in chage say that the number underreported ia on an order or mangitude higher than those reported. These numbers also don't take into account US customs whose records were destroyed in the 9/11 attacks. They are still trying to re-create those records from ancilarry data.

  59. Tell Me It's Not So by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    As an American, I've always thought of Aussies as being likewise independent, free-thinking and friendly people (Mad Max notwithstanding).

    You know, like, "No worries, mate!"

    Now I'm feeling bad because I was worried about the evil Ashcroft and Carnivore while my buddies in Oz are enduring much worse!

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Tell Me It's Not So by mgblst · · Score: 1

      "No worries, mate!"

      Yes.. that is exactly what we want you to think... until it is too late....muuaahhhh.

      Seriously, when things change slowly, and most things that change are under the surface of everyday life, you really don't know how bad it is, unitl it is too late. Well, lets hope it isn't too late.

  60. About America... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know a lot of you out there think that your home countries are a lot safer, more interesting, etc.... and I agree. But you forget one thing about it. America is a real soup of people, and NOTHING COMES EASY IN AMERICA.

    That is the nature of the soup that is the good 'ol USA. Most of the people that are from Finland and Norway say that there are no tensions and no problems at all with others.. well, move to Minnesota or the Upper Penninsula in the USA and you will notice that there is less violence there too... on the count that there really are less ethnic-religious-governmental-general-people tensions. Its the land of happy, slightly overweight hockey playing white guys. Lots of cheese.

    I mean honestly, what the hell is there to argue about in Finland? Do you have a thousand cabbies that come from every country in the world and can't understand you, nor you understand them when they speak? Do you have hundreds of religious groups pining for their big piece of the political pie? Do you have anything that might get you annoyed like that? Unregistered illegal Mexican drivers that ran over kids in a schoolyard and then get no punishment because they are not US citizens, and caused all of this becasue they can't be bothered to read and understand English road signs?

    WHY DOES AMERICA HAVE ALL OF THESE PROBLEMS? Because when poor, uneducated, huddled masses think of travelling to a land of prosperity they don't look around their straw hut and say, "Let's go to Iceland!"

    Don't get me wrong. That's a good thing about being an American. But also you don't get this: when a Mexican punk drug dealer shoots a Texas cop on a sting in front of police, you also don't get an international incident where Vincente Fox shows his ass as a "show of power" to the American people over a P.O.S. drug dealer. The last time I checked, the Netherlands hasn't sent troops anywhere to save people. SO the Netherlands hasn't drawn any heat for it either. Believe it or not, there are several places in the world where people are excited to see me because I am a representative of America. Not everyone will try to kidnap me.

    America-bash away. I don't blame anyone for liking a home country where everyone basically acts and looks the same as you... sounds great. Never had that. Probably pretty nice.

    WE ARE JUST DIFFERENT, WITH DIFFERENT PROBLEMS. NOT BETTER OR WORSE THAN ANYONE, JUST WITH DIFFERENT PROBLEMS. But you can't really blame the USA for going crazy every day. You'd be nuts too if you had this many people that can't agree.

    And another thing. When everyone says we don't need an army it just makes me laugh. Well, that is because we are doing the job for you. Keep in mind that if anyone invaded Norway, Iceland, The Netherlands, Australia, beautiful New Zealand, or anywhere else civilized... we might have the jets in the air faster than you might have yours. Why?

    NOT BECAUSE AMERICA WANTS TO BE MR. BADASS ALL THE TIME. Its actually simpler than that.

    That is what true friends do for friends when they need help. We'd kick butt again for France or Germany (or the Netherlands) in a second if they needed it. Of course, the UK doesn't even need to ask. You get punched silly for even looking at the UK in front of the USA.

    1. Re:About America... by geoswan · · Score: 2
      The last time I checked, the Netherlands hasn't sent troops anywhere to save people.

      Well, maybe you should have checked a little more carefully? Google found a lot of links under Netherlands peacekeeping .

      Sheesh.

      And your comment about cabbies? What are you trying to suggest here? That you would have a more pleasant cab ride if the authorities tapped your cab-driver's phone?

    2. Re:About America... by attackiko · · Score: 1

      >The last time I checked, the Netherlands hasn't sent troops anywhere to save people.

      Sure, Netherlands sent troops to protect Srebrenica in Bosnia. You probably know what happened next. 8.000 massacred Srebrenica civilians. Most americans probably don't know it but only a few years ago we had a massacre in Europe that makes 9/11 pale in comparison.

    3. Re:About America... by murky.waters · · Score: 1
      You're making some good points, but I can't help but wonder: Aren't you arguing that America is merely a divided country at the brink of chaos--brought about by those thousands of foreign cab drivers that seem to irritate you so much?

      Also, what's the point of always blaiming them anyway? Isn't it rather such that most of our problems really don't have anything to do with them (for one thing because they keep doing all the dirty work that so obviously are way beneath what you could ask an nth-generation citizen to do.)

      Isn't, in fact, always blaiming other people one of our most notorious problems? Take for instance the whole "CEO gone corrupt, no surprise there" thing. Who put in place the faulty structure that would allow them to pull their greedy shit? Some evil first gen immigrant?-yeah, right. It wasn't them, and it wasn't our sob politicians. Instead, it was you and me. Our collective greed and ignorance, nothing else.

      By the way, maybe you want to check out this simple sub-tautology: other countries have immigrants, too. Even greedy CEOs.

      Isnt' it great to be number one, though?

      --
      Imagine the Creator as a stand up commedian - and at once the world becomes explicable. -Mencken
    4. Re:About America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my, you are so stupid. The cabbies were an example. Which, if you ever lived in NYC or any other place with lots of cabbies that only speak a foriegn language, would definitely annoy you A LOT when you have a hard time trying to communicate with them.

      There was no blame of issues being assigned to cabbies. God damn, I hate people like you. You are so damn stupid that you always miss the fucking point of everything, then rant on about some unrelated topic. Please, go kill yourself.

    5. Re:About America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think his point was he would hope if they came here to live. They would put forth a bit of effort to interact with the people here. That means speaking American-English.

      It is even more arrogant to come here and think that everyone will bow to your will. Perhaps they might, but not until you can convince them why. Well if they can not understand you...

      If your visiting perhaps you can get away without speaking the language. But if you want to live here. You better be able to at least be able to speak english. Is the bar of at least try to learn the language that high?

    6. Re:About America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

      I love you American patriots espeacially the ones who love to tell us how great the US is when they no nothing about any other country (unless the US has been off bombing some poor camle merchant and his mud hut)

      Few facts Germany and pretty much all of Europe has takes in most of the refuges from the middle east and africa. So i think that the poor me America the melting pot line is a bit weak.

      English is fucken hard to learn (it breaks every rule it sets, try explaining i before e excpet after c to a 60yo Zulu sheepherader!!!) especailly when you have limited formal education (how many AMericans speak 2 languages? do you? Betya its those Spanish Immagrants that do the most)

      America isnt the only countrty doing Peacekeeping its the only country that does peace keeping for Cameras and cameras only (ok thats a bit harsh but sheesh you called the other guy an idiot !!!).

      America is a great country it has had great natural resources, weather land etc, shame about some of the people who think that everyone else should do as well with far less.

      AMerica sells itself via its Movies and adverttising as the greatest palce on earth, no wonder so many of the poor and disenfranchised want to go there, wonder if they can sue for false advertising on arrival.

    7. Re:About America... by Squalish · · Score: 1

      You've got some serious anti-mexican sentiments goin on here. What'ed an immigrant do to you personally?

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
    8. Re:About America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And your comment about cabbies? What are you trying to suggest here? That you would have a more pleasant cab ride if the authorities tapped your cab-driver's phone?"

      The suggestion was obvious. In any major city in america, cabbies are way different from the average folk in white-bread middle america, and from most of the smaller european countries. If you think that that is a racist statement, that says far more about you than about the statement.

    9. Re:About America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most americans probably don't know it but only a few years ago we had a massacre in Europe that makes 9/11 pale in comparison."

      Most americans probably don't know it? What on earth are you talking about? It was all that CNN (the news channel you love to hate) would show for over a month.

      Are you really of the opinion that most americans are brain-damaged apes with an inability to remember events from more than a month ago? I might agree with you, but that's because, being well traveled, I've long since learned that most people in every country fit that description.

    10. Re:About America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far be it from me to question a good, unintelligible rant, but if you simply look at the numbers, its quite clear that the US is very near the top in terms of racial/cultural diversity. And their status as the destination of the downtrodden far predates the rise of the movie industry.

      I'm certainly no unquestioning lover of the US, but extremist idiocy like the above make me ashamed to be a citizen of the EU. The thought that the leak-happy US government could keep a global domination strategy under wraps for long enough to work is simply laughable. McDonalds doesn't even count; if you simply stop giving them money, they'll go away. Or are we all simple sheep who need you to protect us from our own choices?

    11. Re:About America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh?

      Rather presumptous of you to assume that.

      It is simply an example of something ridiculous, to make you laugh and think. But unfortunately you failed to do either.

    12. Re:About America... by geoswan · · Score: 2
      The suggestion was obvious.

      El Camino SS said America was a more dangerous place and, needed more wiretaps, than countries with ethnically homogeneous populations. He said the ethnic heterogenity created arguments that made America less safe.

      Wasn't he advocating, in his ramblings, that more widespread, less accountable, wiretaps were a perfectly acceptable solution to violence, terrorism, and obnoxious, annoying, "argumentative" foreign-born cab-drivers?

      Please go re-read his article, and then tell me if you still think I am overlooking the obvious.

      Oh yeah, and while you are at it, if you believe you live in the "land of the free", why are you hiding behind "anonymous coward"?

      If El Camino SS really believes in freedom, he has to expect to be challenged when he advocates draconian surveillance for those who stand out as different.

    13. Re:About America... by Dermot+the+Forg · · Score: 1

      It says a lot about Slashdot when naive remarks like this are modded up to "5 - Insightful".

      What brainwashing takes place in American schools that breeds such naivete and misplaced passion - a nation of affluent well meaning people so free of cynicism that they are blind to the excesses, hypocrisy and human rights abuses of its rulers?

    14. Re:About America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by 2015 at least 35% of all americans will be speaking spanish. have you started your spanish classes yet so you're able to interact with that third of america when the time comes?

      there is no official language of the US. that's right. it's not english.

      get over it

    15. Re:About America... by Zeio · · Score: 1, Troll

      you are a fucking troll.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
    16. Re:About America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >how many AMericans speak 2 languages? do you?

      No, I learned the right language the first time around.

    17. Re:About America... by geoswan · · Score: 2
      you are a fucking troll.

      What?

      Do you believe in free speech? Do you believe the way to counter a view you don't agree with is to suppress it? Do you believe the way to counter a view you don't agree with is to swear, and call the other person names?

      Did you know there is another approach? You could try to explain what you disagreed with.

      Read what the guy said. He said the USA was justified to issue wiretaps to suppress violence. He said that the USA needed more wiretaps because it had an ethnically diverse population.

      What about due process? Should tools like wiretaps be used for suppression, or should the authorities wait until they can document good reasons for their use?

      My reading of El Camino SS's contribution was that he was prepared to see wiretaps used for suppression, without any of this time-consuming respect for civil rights. That is my honest interpretation -- not a troll.

    18. Re:About America... by Zeio · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I re-read your comment. I dont know why I responsed to you in that fashion. I was probably meaning to go anon on another comment.

      Anyways, totalitarians and lack of du process are indeed scary.

      Cheers, sorry about the mishap.

      --
      Legalize the constitution. Think for yourself question authority.
  61. Its not too bad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    They are all closet BC users anyway..

    MW

  62. Nah, only the politicians... by Slashamatic · · Score: 2
    No, only the politicians and maybe a couple of newspapermen.

    Actually in Australia, to have a family link back to the transportees is seen as a sign of class!!!!

  63. Worse than you think! by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

    Considering that Australia has a population of 20 million, and the U.S has a population of 280 million, that is _alot of tapping. Over here the phone lines are not well maintained, so if you detect a degrading in the quality of your phone calls chances are your being tapped.

    It seems to be that Pine Gap is facing the wrong way.

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
  64. Stupid title by ICA · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find the title of this article horribly stupid?

    Why did they make a point to compare Austrailia to the "entire" United States. Being both countries as they are, I would think a simple comparison would suffice.

    The reverse might have made sense. To say something like "State of Florida taps more phones than the entire Eastern hemisphere" would have been interesting.

    I know it's a rant, but man I would like headlines to be somewhat relevent...

    1. Re:Stupid title by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Australia has less people than a couple large cities.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  65. Hello? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australia is a penal colony. What did you expect?

  66. Like I've always said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aussies call each other "mates". It's short for INMATES. Yes, Australia is just a big giant prison.

    1. Re:Like I've always said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yanks call each other "buddy" . It's short for BUMBUDDY. Yes, America is just a big giant fag-party.

  67. Speakfreely? Encrypted Voice Communications? by linzeal · · Score: 1

    Used against 3rd world governments but works equally well against 1st world ones as well.

  68. grammer nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last year Australian authorities tapped more phones all United States authorities combined.

    Jesus that is just horible. First RIAA is NOT doing anything evil and now we get "more phones all united states". Get a clue.

  69. Kind of right by Nomad37 · · Score: 0

    Hmm...

    Although you're right about Australia having most, but not all.

    There is no right to peaceably assemble. In fact I believe in most States and Territories, if not all, you have to gain police permission or face the possibility of being removed as a public nuisance.

    There is no right to petition the Government as such. In some case, the name of which escapes my mind, it was held there's no actual right to be given a vote!

    And the closest we get to a right to free speech etc is the _implied_ freedom of political communication.

    But yeah, we do have freedom of religion (s116).

    --
    Pessimism of the intellect, optimism of the will! - Antonio Gramsci.
  70. er by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    Shouldnt that be 20 times more than the US officially taps?

    Arn't all international calls routed via satellite into and out of the US are open season as far as tapping is concerned as US law doesn't require a warrant for this type of tap?

    1. Re:er by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Satellite communication is LAGGED.

      I've talked to people in the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia, and it definitely wasn't satellite. Maybe microwave, but probably all cable.

      An interesting tidbit: Back when SS5 signaling was around (blue boxing/2600hz,) calls could be routed usin various codes, which included cable, microwave, military, and satellite. (I think there may have been one other.)

  71. I Agree by shepd · · Score: 2

    I mean, as long as I can buy a 900 Mhz scanner and listen to everyone's CC #s, VMB #s + passcodes why bother?

    Here's hoping you never used your cell or portable phones to say anything silly!

    >:-)

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  72. Julian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Julian (quoted in the update) is one of the authors of the incredible Rubberhose filesystem (rubberhose.org). Wish a better hacker could port this thing to 2.4!

  73. Technically we aren't free. by nenolod · · Score: 1

    It's called the USA Patriot Act. It pretty much kills the entire point of the first amendment, because anything you say can be monitored, and you can be prosecuted as a terrorist, if they dont like what you say.

    1. Re:Technically we aren't free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acts can still be ruled unconstitutional and overturned, Amendments can't be unconstitutional since they are in fact parts of the constitution. The Patriot act will be ruled unconstitutional, its just a matter of time.

  74. indeed more taps in NL by barryvoeten · · Score: 1

    I can confirm Basje's claims. The Ducth
    tap more phones than the US in absolute numbers, with only 15 mln people. "Bits Of Freedom' have
    more specific numbers at http://www.bof.nl/aftappen.html (in Dutch).

    It was even on the reputable Radio 1 last week, btw.

    Barry from Amsterdam

  75. all your base belong to us! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /.: Australian authorities tapped more phones all United States authorities combined!

    ?: Move zig, for great justice!

  76. That's because by acceleriter · · Score: 1

    there are less phones in the U.S. than in Australia. Remember Echelon? We tap the ones in Australia (legally), then give the information to the Aussies (also legally). They do the same for us. Then both of our foreign intelligence agencies can truthfully say "We don't tap our own citizens' phones."

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  77. The Australia must be the bestest place on Earth! by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    Wow! With so many police listening into so many conversations, the crime rate must be nearly zero. How can people do anything wrong if they can be listened to at will!

    Except, um, if the people listening in aren't totally honest themselves. Who listening in on the prosecutors and cops? How long until blackmail starts?

  78. Everybody Knows.... by Uggy · · Score: 2

    Man in Black: Truly you have a dizzing intellect.
    Vizini: Wait 'til I get going. Where was I?
    Man in Black: Australia.
    Vizini: Yes, Australia. And everybody knows Australia is entirely peopled by criminals... and criminals are used to people not trusting them as YOU are not trusted by me. Therefore I can clearly not chose the wine in front of you.

    That about do it folks? Can't believe nobody posted this already. *shakes head*

    --
    Toddlers are the stormtroopers of the Lord of Entropy.
  79. A revealing comment by geoswan · · Score: 2
    Some years ago TVO, Ontario's public educational channel, had a series on new technology. They devoted one show to surveillance, bugging, wiretapping. They very interviewed these two different guys. One was with a guy who sold bug detectors. The other interview was with a grizzled old cop in Washington DC. He looked like Joe Friday. The bug-detector salesman kept touting his products, and saying how good they were at detecting bugs. The grizzled cop kept saying how difficult it was to be sure you weren't being bugged. Finally he said:

    You can never know when you are being bugged. None of our bugs has ever been detected. Why we have conducted over 1,000 legal wiretaps alone.
  80. Re:Aren't Australians All Descended From Criminals by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    New Zealand has a higher crime rate than Australia.

    That is because they don't have wallopies to take their agression out on.

    BTW, *everybody* is probabably descended from at least one criminal if you go back far enough in your family tree.

  81. Impossible! by Arandir · · Score: 2

    This is impossible! Everyone knows that the United States is the world's most corrupt nation, and violates more individual liberties than the next five corrupt nations combined. The US is the home of Microsoft, the MPAA and the RIAA. Alan Cox boycotts the US, not Australia.

    This story cannot be true.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  82. And mysteriously slashdot disappeared.. by anarchima · · Score: 0

    Hmm..I'm surprised some "higher authority" hasn't decided to h@xxx0r the entire slashdot news site to remove such "sensitive" information :P

  83. Living in the land of the free... by geoswan · · Score: 2
    Anyway ... It's true that now many European countries have just as much freedom as the US. But you've got to look at the historical background. At the time of the War of 1812 (when the lines "land of the free and home of the brave" were written) every other great power in the world was a monarchy ... the only other great power in the world that could lay claim to anything approaching the degree of freedom the US offered in those days was Britain.

    Worth noting that during the War of 1812 many of those living in the USA were living as slaves.

    I believe that, during the War of 1812, the UK was farther along in abolishing slavery than was the USA. FWIW.

    Sorry to nitpick, but I think that, in 1812, the USA fell a bit short of "great power" status.

    1. Re:Living in the land of the free... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAH. The companies who profitted from moving slaves across the Atlantic were almost entirely British. And the crown was privy to much of that profit. We got our act together before the US, but not by much. Certainly not by 1812.

      Dead on about the USA not being a "great power" in 1812. Far from it in fact.

  84. Well I figure if you're going to wiretapped .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not have fun with it??

    http://www.langmaker.com/mlindex.htm

    Learn to speak in some wierd goofy language and annoy the hell out of the people doing the wiretapping.

  85. That's not what the article says at all! by bumbaclaat · · Score: 1

    If you read it carefully, it says Australia filed more wiretap warrants than the US as officially reported by the two governments. That doesn't necessarily have any relationship to the actual number of wiretaps, legal, quasi-legal or outright illegal. We did learn all about Echelon on Slashdot right? HELLO

  86. Time for typical /. knee-jerk response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many posts will blame this on John Ashcroft in some way?

  87. perspective by jade42 · · Score: 1

    This kind of story forces us Americans to take a good looks at the rights that we are all afforded. Australia is not some thrid-world country of communist dictatorship. It's a democracy and close ally of the U.S. and still the people have to put up with a kind of opression that we could (hopefully) scream about. Rights are not handed to people, they have to demand them. This country is moving towards a dangerous time for our rights. I hope that the people don't forget that our rights are what makes this such a great place to live. Not McDonald's, not the movies, not Everybody Loves Raymond. The foresight of the writers of the constitution has protected us from the current condidtion of the not only Australian citizens, yet also those of many other democracies in this world. However, we cannot be protected forever. As it was said by the Beastie Boys: "You gotta fight for your right to party."

    --

    Brought to you by the Artificial Idea Factory.
    1. Re:perspective by m1066ad · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's why in 'Murica we've had about 1200 people locked up without any charges even being filed against them, for over a year. They haven't seen a judge, much less a lawyer. The really scary part: most good ol' 'Muricans think this is just ok, fine, dandy, and the way things oughtta be. After all, they were arrested by legal authorities, so they must have done SOMETHING wrong, right? Heck, Fox news says so, so it's gotta be so.

    2. Re:perspective by AmbientNightmare · · Score: 1

      actually...all those people being detained in cuba that have been apprehended aren't american citizens, so they technically have no right to Habeus Corpus. However, if you look at John Walk Lindh (Scum) he has already had hearings, and the trial starts soon. So, actually...everything is fine and dandy, as long as American citizens aren't being held without trial.

  88. Bad PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The more I hear about Autralia, the more amazed I am about that country. It's as if someone wants them to look like real facists.

    They won't accept boat refugees, they ban books, magazines and films, they wiretap phones and computers.

    Yet another country I'm going to avoid...

  89. Consider this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    A couple of observations need to be made:-

    1. Do you believe the stats on phone-tapping ? The FBI in the good old days of J E Hoover used to go to Congressional inquiries and honestly say they only had a few wire taps (all with the requisite warrants) because they used to pull all their illegal taps the day before (and then reconnect them the next day);

    2. Maybe Australia's crime rate is lower than the US in part because of a greater use of wire taps ?

  90. Akihito by Squalish · · Score: 1

    Nitpick:Japan's reigning emperor has had a purely ceremonial function since 1946, much like the british monarchy, but they are far from outlawed.

    --
    People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
  91. Re:About America's Anonymous Cowards... by murky.waters · · Score: 1
    I think his point was he would hope if they came here to live. They would put forth a bit of effort to interact with the people here.[sic] That means speaking American-English.
    Plain English won't do, eh?

    Darn, "eh" tends towards Canadian, right? **Off to get my taxi driver license**

    --
    Imagine the Creator as a stand up commedian - and at once the world becomes explicable. -Mencken
  92. Parent speaker of thread again... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2

    (how many AMericans speak 2 languages? do you? Betya its those Spanish Immagrants that do the most)

    Si. Puedo hablar otros idiomas. En los EEUU es importante a hablar con los conductador de los taxiz (o taxis, se depende en particular a parte del Sudamerica y la accente).

    Why yes, I do speak two languages.

    By the way, I understand that you English is not the greatest, but keep it up... I can tell that you are getting better. I am not being sarcastic. I appreciate you trying to use your foreign language skills.

    However... I would not move to Spain unless I had a good grasp of the language. Nor would I drive illegally, nor enter the country illegally, nor would I not pay taxes and then try to get free health benefits.

    Just because I see that the people of another country are coming here and cannot understand the language doesn't mean I hate them, I am just pointing out that "it ain't easy brother."

  93. Line Tap # by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try this one: 1-900-FUC-KYOU

  94. I am the partent of this thread... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2

    for one thing because they keep doing all the dirty work that so obviously are way beneath what you could ask an nth-generation citizen to do.)

    Personally, I don't have a lot of hate for bad examples, but I can really say this one out loud and on slashdot over THAT STATEMENT...

    FUUUUUCK YOU.

    You really can't sell me that shit.

    First of all, I never met my grandfather because a mine cave-in. So if you would like to sell me the one about the dirty fucking jobs out there for the immigrants, then you are barking up the wrong tree. The only reason my people got out of the mines was because one generation had an errant gene that made them too tall.

    At least the immigrants get to see the fucking sun during the Winter. SO FUUUUCK YOU. There are plenty of Americans that get their hands dirty, and bust ass for little money. AND PAY TAXES ON IT.

    But let's not dwell on the immigrants, lets talk about the one group that has been here 150 years (juuuust right after the colonists), and still gets treated like shit.

    Yes, I'm talking black people in America.

    What about my black friends that have been here for generations and still can't get a decent fucking job? What about them? Yeah. You're right. Poor immigrants. Their problem is that they can't speak the language. NO! Their problem is that they don't pay taxes. Black people pay taxes and work right next to them. Talk about a fuck job.

    You know what the difference is in America between a black man in a car with a license and an immigrant hispanic without one? THE FUCKING FLASHING LIGHTS BEHIND THE BLACK MAN'S CAR.

    POOR IMMIGRANTS. Always so polite. Blend in so well. Never drunk in public, or stealing your shit. NEVER EVER PLAYING THEIR STEREO TOO LOUD AT THREE A.M. NEVER PARKING IN YOUR STREET WITH THE THREE THOUSAND CARS SUPER-EXPENSIVE CARS THAT BELONG TO THEIR ONE HOUSE.

    I guess I resent the fact that Third-Worlders come over, and then act like the Third World all over again. Its about the fucking courtesy... not the festivals.

  95. Krupt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US has the best presidency money can buy. :-)

  96. Re:Well I figure if you're going to wiretapped ... by Kredal · · Score: 2

    Talk to the wiretappers. Ask them how they're doing... how you can get a job with them.. tell them jokes... make it fun for them. (:

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  97. *Parliamentarian subjects - you are not free * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Under a parliamentary system (such as they have in Australia, UK, Canada, Germany, etc) there are NO guaranteed rights, like we have here in the US.

    The only freedoms the people have are those "granted to them by Parliament". Many of the basic rights we have in the US are "granted by God", not some political body...and can never be infringed upon.

    Big difference! You defenders of the parliamentary system can just keep believing the illusion, but you are NOT really free. You are one vote away from losing those freedoms you DO have...

  98. Other countries: incarceration rates, Other rights by samfreed · · Score: 1
    Not so bad, considering....

    For example, The USA keeps about 0.7% of the population behind bars. For comparison, a rate of 0.1% is common in western Europe. It gives a whole new meaning to "the land of the FREE". See this story from The Economist (may require registration...).

    My Country, Israel, does not think that Humans have rights at all; like leaving their own front door. I am lucky on that front, I only got arrested three times, and my home was searched, for making minor protests, like waving a pirate flag on my own balcony.

    Would rather (just) have my phone tapped.

  99. Right to arm bears? by Disevidence · · Score: 1

    Bloody right too. Imagine all those polar bears running around with ak-47's. Madness.

    --
    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  100. Obviously Still No Law Against Stupidity by Self+Bias+Resistor · · Score: 2

    but your average Aussie is still racist

    Shows how much you know about Australia. What bullshit. The words and actions of a vocal and (unfortunately) influential minority do not a country make. There were a lot of people who voted against John Howard in the last election, myself included. Are you saying that I, as well as all these other people, are racists? I don't think so.

    But hey, while we're on stereotypes here, can I say that the average American is a fat, ignorant git who's more than willing to give up his "freedoms" in order to feel "safe" again? I don't believe that's true, but you'd be suprised what people would believe in the absence of the truth.

    --

    ----------
    When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer our friend.

    1. Re:Obviously Still No Law Against Stupidity by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 1

      Did you vote Labor? They jumped on the racist bandwagon. Around 80% of the population voted for one of the two main parties, both of which were exploiting xenophobia - yes Libs more than Labor, but Labor should have made a stand.

      I voted Green. I believe they, and the Socialist Alliance, were the only ones to come out openlyt against the racist tide.

      I don't like the fact, and I know there are heaps of non-racist Australians... but a lot of people vote for Howard. and a lot of people voted for One Nation!

      --
      * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
  101. Good Point by Self+Bias+Resistor · · Score: 2

    I don't like the fact, and I know there are heaps of non-racist Australians... but a lot of people vote for Howard. and a lot of people voted for One Nation!

    That I agree with. But it's more accurate to say that One Nation has been (rightfully) confined to the "lunatic fringe" section of politics and is not the great threat to the mainstream parties that it apparently once was. The main frustration I have with Australian politics at the moment is that there really is no worthy opposition to the current government and that, knowing how fucked-up the current government can and has been, is a pretty scary thing. What I'd like to see is something like in Sweden (where I am at the moment) - a social democracy. But that would require increased taxes and a combining of the two types of politics (which might require, *gasp*, agreeing on things) and given the inability of Australian politicians to even suggest either or both possibilites, I don't see it happening in the near future.

    --

    ----------
    When the pin is pulled, Mr. Grenade is no longer our friend.