Slashdot Mirror


Fighting Telemarketers with Technology

prostoalex writes "According to an MSNBC story, 104 million telemarketing calls are made daily in the U.S. alone and technology is on the way to fight those special offers and incredible credit card rates. Zenith EZ HangUp, The Phone Butler, TriVOX VN100 and ScreenMachine are quoted in the article as new gadgets that allow phone owners to avoid the plagues of telemarketing."

220 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. don not call list by alexc · · Score: 5, Informative

    an effective CHEAP way of eliminating telemarketers is saying "PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR DO NOT CALL LIST." By law, telemarketers are not allowed call ppl on this list. It has worked for me.

    1. Re:don not call list by Surak · · Score: 4, Informative

      I worked for a telemarketer in the IT department. It depends on the state you're in. There is no federal law that I'm aware of requiring telemarketers to have a DNC (telemarketerspeak: DNC=Do Not Call list). Many states require telemarketers to have a DNC but some do not. So check with your state government if you're not sure.

    2. Re:don not call list by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is no federal law that I'm aware of requiring telemarketers to have a DNC (telemarketerspeak: DNC=Do Not Call list).

      There certainly is! And they're REQUIRED to put you on it IMMEDIATELY! (none of this "it'll take a few weeks to get your number into the list" BS).

      Of course, most of the calls we get today are either from organizations exempt from the laws (political candidates, banks or phone companies, surveys, charitable organizations), or they're simply recorded messages (which are, actually, illegal as well).

      I've got "put me on your do not call list immediately" as part of my answering machine message -- one of these days I'll start tracking the messages that people leave me and sue them for ignoring my request (if they can leave me a message with an automated machine, I can request to be put on the DNC with an automated message).

      Unfortunately, even having state-sponsored do not call lists won't help. As I've said before, laws are only as effective as their enforcement. Until we decide to actually give some police organization real authority to prosecute these people, unscrupulous telemarketers will just ignore whatever "opt-out" laws there are and call you, anyway. What have they got to lose? Maybe .01% of the people they piss off actually haul them to court, and half those cases they get out of on a technicality?

      Anyway, I'm rambling.

      So, yes, there is a federal law requiring telemarketers to maintain a "do not call" list, but telemarketers' adherence to the law is spotty, and consumers' recourse against people ignoring the law is cumbersome. So they prosper, and we fume.

    3. Re:don not call list by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Informative

      The FCC would seem to disagree.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:don not call list by Scutter · · Score: 5, Informative

      What about the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (Public Law 102-243 (1991), which amended Title II of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. Section 201 et seq.)?

      No person or entity shall initiate any
      telephone solicitation to a residential telephone subscriber

      1. before the hour of 8 A.M. or after 9 P.M. (local time at the called party's location), and

      2. unless such person or entity has instituted procedures for maintaining a list of persons who do not wish to receive telephone solicitations made by or on behalf of that person or entity.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    5. Re:don not call list by 74ragbug · · Score: 2

      "Unfortunately, even having state-sponsored do not call lists won't help." I can attest that in the state of Indiana, the state-sponsored do not call list DOES help. I got on the list that went into force on July 1 this year. Since that time, calls have trailed off significantly. Sure, you still get calls from "exempt" (for whatever reason) groups, but many of the aluminum siding and lawn-care calls have stopped. My suggestion is that anyone who calls your house should be required by law to show up with name and number on caller ID. If I randomly started calling people and bothering them at home, I'm sure they could file harassment charges against me. What's the difference when the same phone company keeps calling you back week after week trying to get you to switch to their service?

    6. Re:don not call list by kidlinux · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you're in the US, I bet half (or more) of the calls you get are from Canada. I have several friends who were telemarketers for summer jobs, and they only called the states.
      The telemarketing companies may operate here because a) cheaper labour, and b) the laws in the US don't apply. But IANAL, so I could be wrong.

      I find the first link above rediculous because their DNC list requires a payment and subscription fee. I recall my friends saying that they have to provide instructions on how a person can be removed from telemarketing lists (or files, as they called them, I guess.) There was no charge for being removed from said files.

      --
      -kidlinux.
    7. Re:don not call list by LlamaDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Missouri, we have a pretty effective no call list. We (the state) have made quite a bit of $$ of various telemarketers, including Miss Cleo (did you know she's not really Jamaican!?!?). And I've only gotten telemarking calls from the phone companies (naturally, there are still loopholes for them). If it's implemented right, a state-sponsored list goes a long way.

      ~LD

    8. Re:don not call list by BeBoxer · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Unfortunately, even having state-sponsored do not call lists won't help. As I've said before, laws are only as effective as their enforcement.


      Actually, Colorado's new state-wide DNC list is working quite well. Since it went into effect in July, I belive I have gotten a total of 1 (one) telephone solicitation. Before, I was getting at least 3 or 4 a week. I had pretty much stopped answering the phone in the evening because the telemarketers were outcalling my friends and family by a significant margin. Keep in mind that I was scrupulous about telling every single company that called to put me on their DNC list. From what I could tell, it didn't make much of a dent. I tried to keep a list of the companies who called and when, but really only got a couple of repeat calls. There are so many companies doing telemarketing (and new ones every day) that per-company DNC lists are an exercise in futility.

      Colorado's law allows individuals to file suit in small claims court against companies who call in violation of the law. The state also provides a web site were you can file a complaint on-line with the State AG. So far, I know at least one personal suit has been filed (settled out of court) and the AG's office have notified several companies that they are in violation of the law. At last count, almost half the residential phone lines in the state were on the list!

      Say what you want, but at least here in Colorado the list is working quite well. Actually much better than I had hoped. Since I know that I can sue any telemarketer dumb enough to call, I actually sit around and hope that they will call. But they never do. :-)

    9. Re:don not call list by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2

      Some states, like Kentucky, have a do not call list anyone can sign up for maintained by the attourney general's office. All telemarketers must check it before calling. I joined the list as soon as the law was passed, and never got a single call again. The list works. We don't need no stinkin' gadgets!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    10. Re:don not call list by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      The "PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR DO NOT CALL LIST." line just doesn't work. State based "Do Not Call" lists also have loopholes for charity, and you still get some calls (although not as many).

      I prefer to engage the caller in a raunchy phone sex session. Good entertainment. Just don't start off with the four letter words right off the bat - engage them for a little bit. As a bonus, the longer you have them on the line, the less other people they can annoy.

      Another option if you don't mind tying up your line for a few minutes is to use the hold feature many phones have. Just tell the caller "This sounds really interesting, but can you hang on a minute? I have to grab my notepad." Put them on hold and ignore it.

      If you have a "call transfer" feature on your line, try transfering them to a pizza place, or some other business - maybe one that has pissed you off in the past. Speed dial works great for this.

    11. Re:don not call list by Surak · · Score: 3

      Unfortunately, even having state-sponsored do not call lists won't help. As I've said before, laws are only as effective as their enforcement. Until we decide to actually give some police organization real authority to prosecute these people, unscrupulous telemarketers will just ignore whatever "opt-out" laws there are and call you, anyway. What have they got to lose? Maybe .01% of the people they piss off actually haul them to court, and half those cases they get out of on a technicality?

      I can tell you that where I worked, the DNC lists that we maintained were treated like gold. We had DAILY redundant backups, two copies of which were stored off-site. Every outgoing call was recorded so there would never be any doubt that someone wanted to be on the DNC.

      I was told that this was because of there very afraid of opt-out laws because of having been sued in the past.

      So if someone calls you back and you know you're on the DNC list, SUE 'EM! Take 'em to court and fry their ass! They'll never do it again, I can just about guarantee that. :)

    12. Re:don not call list by rikkards · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually Canada has similar laws (ontario at least). I used to get called once a month by both the Ottawa Sun and Ottawa Citizen asking if I wanted to get a subscription. I told them to take me off their list. Haven't been called since.

    13. Re:don not call list by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      Living in Colorado, loving the DNC list. Used to get several calls a week, now nearly none. Before the list went into effect, "put me on your do not call list" cut down fairly significantly on the amount of calls I got -- a lot of them were for newspaper subscriptions or long distance service. But the new law is great.
      If we had the equivalent for SPAM, SPAM would not be a problem.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    14. Re:don not call list by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      I have kind of the same feeling. An unscrupulous telemarketer won't care about DNC lists.

      Why not create a telephone with callerID, and apply rules to the ID?

      I want a telephone that recognizes an anonymous caller ID and automatically plays back a message saying "Sorry, not accepting anonymous calls. Call back with the * feature to disable anonymous calls." And when a CallerID is blacklisted (like a telemarketer), it could go to voicemail saying "Sorry, a human will never answer the phone when you call. Take me off your list."

      Ultimately, I want a 'phone firewall' to specifically allow or deny people to call, responding with a custom voice message for each rule. If/when that happens, suddenly we'll have a really useful tool to secure our phones from spam.

    15. Re:don not call list by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2
      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    16. Re:don not call list by damiangerous · · Score: 3, Informative
      I want a telephone that recognizes an anonymous caller ID and automatically plays back a message saying "Sorry, not accepting anonymous calls. Call back with the * feature to disable anonymous calls."


      I have that. My phone company calls it Privacy Manager, others use different terms but it's offered all across the country. When CallerID can't determine the number the caller gets a recorded message asking them to press 1 to record their name, or to enter a code to bypass Privacy Manager and ring my phone. If they press 1 my phone rings with Privacy Manager listed as the caller. When I pick up I hear the caller's recorded name and I can choose to answer or send it right to voicemil. Unwanted calls never even get this far though, since most telemarketers are use automated dialers and couldn't get past the Privacy Manager menu if they wanted to.

    17. Re:don not call list by Scutter · · Score: 2

      I've been noticing a new tactic used by telemarketers here in sunny Wisconsin. Upon asking to be added to the DNC list, the person on the other end rapidly spits out something to the effect of "You need to call our DNC list management group at 1-800-555-1212" and then hangs up before I can ask for the number again to write it down. I 'spose it technically meets the rule, but effectively I can't get on the list unless I can remember a 7 digit random number that I heard one time quickly long enough to get to a pen and paper. Jerks.

      Actually, I *think* that's illegal. They can't make you call another number to opt out. They're supposed to do it immediately when you ask them on the original call. You might want to look at this anti-telemarketing script from Junkbusters.com to get a feel for what you can successfully sue them for.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    18. Re:don not call list by The+Vulture · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep.

      Chances are, you're getting called from Canada. I used to have it as a summer job before I got my big break in the United States. I hated it, and I was miserable pitching credit cards with a 29% APR to young 20-somethings and seniors, and cable packages from TCI/Qwest.

      I'd say that kidlinux has it nailed. Cheaper labor (although the one that I worked at paid $8.00 per hour, which for Ontario was actually pretty good three years ago) is the main reason - you get a lot of university/college kids who are desparate for summer jobs, and they hope that you'll continue doing it when the summer is over. However, the U.S. law DOES apply, furthermore, if I remember correctly, the company that we were doing the telemarketing for could be held liable if we screwed up. Interestingly enough, the place that I was working for, we observed American holidays. We didn't get July 1st (Canada Day) off, we got July 4th off instead. The company took some heat from the Ontario Department of Labor for that.

      Remember, when dealing with a telemarketer, be calm and collected. You yelling at us doesn't do you any good (I'll explain in a bit). The best way to get them to stop calling you is to explicitly ask, "Put me on your Do Not Call list". Saying, "Don't ever call here again" is NOT the same. You must explicitly say, "Put me on your Do Not Call list".

      There was one guy I was working with at that call center, and he used to LOVE it when the people he was calling got angry at him. Unless they said, "Put me on your Do Not Call list", he wouldn't (which he didn't have to do - I on the other hand was a bit more generous and would do so, even if they just asked me not to call them again). Since the dialing was done by computers, you could specify exact times that they called. The promotion that we were working on had very few callers (home mortgages, they wanted the "best sellers" on that one), so if you put up a fuss, he'd schedule a call back for 15 minutes later, and chances are, he'd get you again.

      -- Joe

    19. Re:don not call list by McDevlin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, I would have to say---as an operator of an outbound call center--yes telemarketing!---that this is an issue/problem that is begining to solve itself.

      Anyone who has a phone room and does not voluntarily maintain and keep a DNC list---is a fool.

      If people want off the list, take them off the dam list! There clearly is no business value in calling irate people who say *I told you to take me off your &%^$## LIST!*

      Eventually, the *market* will take care of the clowns who are too dumb or blind to see that there is no value in calling those who don't want to be called!

      From Canada, McDevlin says hello to all my friends.

    20. Re:don not call list by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "an effective CHEAP way of eliminating telemarketers is saying "PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR DO NOT CALL LIST." By law, telemarketers are not allowed call ppl on this list. It has worked for me."

      The telemarketers are getting smart and it you start to indicate that you're not interested and thank you anyway and quickly hang up. Of course this is before you get the chance to tell them to add you to the do not call list, thus letting them try their luck again.

      Whenever I talk to these people, the FIRST words that come out of my mouth are "please add us to you do not call list" so that they don't get to hang up before I tell them.

    21. Re:don not call list by Pathwalker · · Score: 2

      This only works if you actually get a person who can put you on a no call list - most of the telemarketing calls I've been getting lately have been completely automated.

      You pick up the phone, and the computer that called you plays a recorded advertisement at you. If you hang up before the recording finishes, it keeps calling back until you let the whole thing play.

    22. Re:don not call list by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      I want a telephone that recognizes an anonymous caller ID and automatically plays back a message saying "Sorry, not accepting anonymous calls. Call back with the * feature to disable anonymous calls."

      Microsoft used to sell a 900Mhz cordless phone system that did this. I have one that I bought for $30 or so long after they had been discontinued. It's a hell of a nice phone - a little big, but very powerful. Plug it into a serial port, install the phone software, and you can do anything. You can filter by caller ID, setup nearly unlimited mailboxes, create relatively sophisticated menu driven trees, etc.

      The bad:
      - Only runs under Windows. Worse, it was made for 95/98 and doesn't work under NT or 2k (I didn't try ME)
      - Computer has to be running 24/7 (not a problem for most people here)

      I'm now using an AMX system with a phone interface & serial interface to my PC to handle my call filtering. Much more powerful than the Microsoft phone. Also much more expensive.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    23. Re:don not call list by Jetson · · Score: 2
      I want a telephone that recognizes an anonymous caller ID and automatically plays back a message saying "Sorry, not accepting anonymous calls. Call back with the * feature to disable anonymous calls."

      I have a Caller-ID box that does that. It's an Aastra "Voice-9090". It has a lot of neat features:

      • speaks the telephone number of all callers so I can choose to ignore them without getting out of my chair to see who it is
      • allows me to substitute small recordings ("don't answer - it's your boss!") for recognized callers
      • can recognize callers based on number, name or both (such as "payphone")
      • when receiving a id-blocked call (optionally) says "The party you are calling does not accept blocked calls. Remove your block condition and try your call again."
      I "purchased" it from my bank using customer loyalty points (similar airmiles).
  2. Privacy Manager by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use my phone company's Privacy Manager feature. Since we started using it, we hardly get any spam calls anymore. It's definately worth the 4 bucks a month.

    1. Re:Privacy Manager by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I use my phone company's Privacy Manager feature

      Isn't it funny how the same phone company which sold your number to everyone and his brother now charges you so that you don't receive calls from these guys?

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    2. Re:Privacy Manager by dochood · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've used this service, too, and it works great!

      We used to get calls from "Out of Area" where you would pick up, you could hear the heavy breathing (and the telemarketers in the background), and then they'd hang up. This would happen 3-4 times a day, besides the other telemarketing calls.

      However, my in-laws in Korea got really ticked with the thing, because it took them forever to figure out how to record their names, and when they did, it always added another 4-5 minutes to their call! I tried to explain how to use the direct dial code, but that didn't work too well, either (it's 10 digits!... mess it up, and you got to do it all over again)

      So, when AG Jay Nixon of MO got a law passed that requires telemarketers to sign up for no-call lists, I tried it out. Recently, I turned off the screening service, and I still get one telemarketing call per week or so. Perhaps my number just automatically left the lists because the service was on so long, or maybe folks really are obeying the law. (Miss Cleo got socked with several thousand dollars in fines recently for disobeying this law.... too bad she didn't see it coming!)

    3. Re:Privacy Manager by michaelwb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I also like how the phone company charges you a monthly fee not be listed in the directory.

      Imagine if companies you did business with - charged you a monthly fee not to distribute your contact information!

      (Don't even get me started on how many phone companies still charge for touch-tone service each month, even though that is the standard now!)

    4. Re:Privacy Manager by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you pay for your right to be left alone. So USA.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    5. Re:Privacy Manager by Raven42rac · · Score: 2

      should'nt that be free?

      --
      I hate sigs.
    6. Re:Privacy Manager by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      If you just want the privacy of an unlisted number (so people can't look you up to bug you), most phone companies will put your phone number under any name you want. Just tell them to put your name as John Doe. It won't cut down on the telemarketers, but if you ever get a call for John Doe, you could instantly hang up. Plus it saves you a buck or two a month.

      Or just get a cellphone.

    7. Re:Privacy Manager by cioxx · · Score: 2

      This has been invented 3 years ago. Welcome to 1999.

      Not only this story is old as hell, it's a stupid device. Nothing to see here folks.

      Next time a telemarketer calls you, simply tell them to take you off the list, and hang up. Just saved yourself some money.

    8. Re:Privacy Manager by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      Isn't it funny how the same phone company which sold your number to everyone and his brother now charges you so that you don't receive calls from these guys?

      Verizon charges several dollars a month just to keep your number unlisted. Now that's a serious scam.

    9. Re:Privacy Manager by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2

      That's not the point. If I'm calling a company, I might want to block caller ID as a default privacy option as is my right as a private citizen. The feature is needed for that reason. It should be (may already be, but with exceptions you can drive a truck through) illegal for telemarketers to block. Of course, they could just set up on a network that doesn't share this information with other network operators to avoid any responsibility.

    10. Re:Privacy Manager by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
      Read the article. A lot of us aren't too happy that the phone company wants to sell you something to protect yourself from an abusive practice that they are aiding and abetting.

      I like the automated response with a way to punch through. If they ignore your request not to be bothered and punch through you have a much better legal case. I guess you would have to keep them on the line and gather all their vitals so you know who to sue.

      Wouldn't it be nice if you could subscribe to a legal service to handle all the bother? Instead of gathering the data yourself, say "hold on, I'm really interested in this", and punch a button to forward them to the service who takes if from there. They can have most of the money recovered if they can really hurt these bastards.

    11. Re:Privacy Manager by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's what Privacy Manager (Privacy Director where I am) are for - if the number is blocked ("private") or out of area (which is common now, as many in the US are called using cheapo long distance companies that don't support caller ID, or they call from Canada, which is usually out of area), then, like placing a collect phone call, the caller must identify himself before your phone even rings.

      If they actually bother to identify themselves, you get to hear who it is from their recording, and you can accept the call, or press a number to send them a prerecorded "these kinds of phone calls are not accepted at this number" (or some such).

      To not be a nuisance to your friends and family who get caught by this, our phone company offers a pin you can give them so they can by-pass the required identification.

      This eliminated virtually all of my telemarketing calls.

      But, as others have pointed out, I felt like it was extortion, and stopped the service. "Put me on your don't call list" does NOT work for me - I get so many hang-ups it's unbelievable. I have heard that if a man says "put me on your DNC list", they mark that on their list, and when they call back again, if it's a man, they hang up (and vice-versa for a woman). So I get a million hang-ups.

      What worse is, lately, I get people calling who get my answering machine. The power has gone out so much that I just leave the default message (some computerized sounding woman's voice saying "after tone leave message"). I come home and usually have at least one stupid message: "Hello? Can I speak to Anne [or some other name that no one in my house has]? Hello?"

      Either that or hang-ups. I am considering a cellphone, but with 2 adults in the house, and a nice size house, it's kind of annoying with one phone. Family plans cost as much as, if not more than, the regular service with caller ID and privacy director, and give me the feature of conveniently placed phones around the house - plus the dial-up fallback when the cable modem goes out. To answer the next question - no I don't have a cellphone, and I don't want one. My wife has prepaid, but that's annoying, too.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    12. Re:Privacy Manager by mosch · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've found that using the Junkbusters anti-telemarketing script helps quite a bit as well. It's a little bit annoying for the first few weeks, but after that, the calls drop off quite dramatically.

    13. Re:Privacy Manager by DEBEDb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The right to be let alone (as the
      foundation of all freedoms) was recognized
      by famous US Supreme Court Justice Louis
      Brandeis. Unfortunately, it was in his
      dissent... :)

      --

      Considered harmful.
    14. Re:Privacy Manager by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2

      I'd ask for my money back. If they can't fix this problem, I'd say their system in non-functional.

    15. Re:Privacy Manager by DEBEDb · · Score: 2

      There are laws against stalking, harassing
      phone calls, etc. They clearly establish a
      right to be left alone if one wishes.

      --

      Considered harmful.
    16. Re:Privacy Manager by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      Show me that in the US Constitution or any State Constitution.

      Exactly. That's why the guy said it was so USA. We're a country of legal fundamentalists. Suffering constant sales calls is one way to prove your dedication to the one true set of laws. If the founding fathers didn't mention telemarketing in the Constitution, it just isn't important. We should all leave our phones off the hook so we have more time to study the Constitution, anyway.

    17. Re:Privacy Manager by BinxBolling · · Score: 2
      What worse is, lately, I get people calling who get my answering machine. The power has gone out so much that I just leave the default message (some computerized sounding woman's voice saying "after tone leave message"). I come home and usually have at least one stupid message: "Hello? Can I speak to Anne [or some other name that no one in my house has]? Hello?"

      I used to leave the default message on my answering machine, too. At the time, I had a job that would have me out of town for a week at a time, so I would come home to find the occasional marketing message on the machine.

      Once, a marketer who got the machine and didn't realize it launched into her little spiel, chattered away for about 30 seconds, until she reached the first point in the script that called for her to ask me a question. So she asked the question, and, getting no response started saying "Hello? Hello?" She continued this for at least a minute before giving up and disconnecting.

    18. Re:Privacy Manager by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

      NO, that is the point. As a private citizen, I have paid for the right to know who is calling before I pick it up. If Ma Bell charges me for that right, then they should not give away for free the ability for someone else to subvert what I have paid for.

      Personally I think that there is a nice happy medium between the right to privacy of citizens and the desire to know if the person calling you is a tele-marketer.
      We just need to place a requirement on businesses that, if you are calling to market a product and/or solicit dontaions/votes/etc. That you must have your company name and telephone number appear in caller-id. Simple as that, if you are a private citizen, you can block caller ID. If you are a company/organization making a phone call as part of your business, then you must openly proclaim yourself as such.
      But then, I'm sure that the lawyers would screw even this simple of an idea up.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    19. Re:Privacy Manager by wilhelm · · Score: 2

      Apparently many of them get something I have heard called a "cross-street" directory; basically the list of numbers along a street, organized by address. We often got marketing calls in which the operator would read the wrong name from the list, and start talking to us as if we were our across-the-street neighbor (with address one number lower). Then we'd tell them it was the wrong number, and hang up. Then the phone would ring several seconds later, same person, same spiel, but getting the right name. Used to happen all the time.

    20. Re:Privacy Manager by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2

      (Don't even get me started on how many phone companies still charge for touch-tone service each month, even though that is the standard now!)

      And they charge you even if you don't use it! I had a friend who was still in the stone age using a dial-phone two years ago - and the phone company "couldn't" take off the touch-tone charge.

    21. Re:Privacy Manager by Saurentine · · Score: 2
      I also like how the phone company charges you a monthly fee not be listed in the directory.



      Don't pay. Tell them to list your number in the phone book as a fictional name. Don't tell them it's a fictional name, and keep responsibility for the bill in your own name. It's perfectly legal. I did this for years and the phone company never even questioned why the listing name was different than the billing name.



      Then, when you get calls for whatever unpronouncable foreign name you've chosen, you'll know its a telemarketer and you can either mess with them at your leisure or hang up without worry of pissing off the in-laws. If you pick a name that's unpronouncable enough, I'm sure that some telemarketers will even pretend your name wasn't even on their call list.



      The phone's in my wife's name right now, but the next time we move, I'll go back to being listed in the phone book as "Sunil Punjalabadjiniet" or something similar.

    22. Re:Privacy Manager by Raven42rac · · Score: 2

      now now now, there is no need to be thread nazi, I realized the mistake about 2 seconds after hitting submit, so I do know how to spell.

      --
      I hate sigs.
  3. Easy fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I didnt read the article, but you could insert the first tone of a telecom's disconnected line signal on your answering machine, and automated systems will delist you.

    1. Re:Easy fix by RobinH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's how this Telezapper works.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    2. Re:Easy fix by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Okay, I used to program call centers, and I really don't think this Telezapper works, unless they have MAJORLY changed hardware and software since 1998. This is how telemarketing was done:

      - Autodialer dials number from read-only database
      - Upon pickup, it picks the next available agent, your info shows up on their computer terminal via application bridge from the switch to a computer on the LAN.
      - If you hang up, agent gets dialtone, and they hit a button to flag they are available for the next call

      I don't care what signal you send to the switch, your number is in a read-only computer database that automates the dialer, not some dynamic read-write database. I mean, think of the security holes in that model! And if you made such a model, then you lose phone numbers, which means less calling stats, and lower numbers. Or some angry hax0r could break in, and program a number of someone they don't like in there (how often I realized I could get back at my enemies by putting them on the autodialer, they'd get a "out of area" call every 10-25 minutes).

      When you ask to be put on the "do not call list" then flag the number to be removed from the database, but that has to be done manually. Another thing is that a lot of the products and "companies" that call you are really a huge call center pool in Podunk, Wisconsin (where land and labor are cheap), that isn't really the company. Like say ABC Mortgage calls you to get a second mortgage. That's not ABC Mortgage calling you, but a call center they contracted to do dialing for them in return for a promised percentage of sales.

      Another sneaky, low-down-dirty trick used against you is that the following companies sell your number: Dominos, Pizza Hut, and other delivery places. They trace your number via CallerID and they have your address....

      I pay for an unlisted number, but sure enough, within a year, I got telemarketers (someone who was housesitting ordered a Pizza). When I am "forced" to give phone numbers (by contests and whatnot), I give my fax/modem line. From time to time, when I am not on the modem, I see the "ring" light go on and off (we have the fax at a silent ring). I can't imagine how many people have called that number.

      ________________________________________________ __ __
      www.punkwalrus.com - Incomplete sentences can be

    3. Re:Easy fix by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      I don't care what signal you send to the switch, your number is in a read-only computer database that automates the dialer, not some dynamic read-write database. What the telezapper does is to send out a fake 'busy' or 'fax waiting' signal to the switch. This fools the automated switch into thinking that it should try another line.

      A human calling the same line is probably not even going to hear the tone (it can be sent out before the pickup signal) and if they do will probably ignore it.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    4. Re:Easy fix by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Okay, I used to program call centers

      Ah. So it's all *your* fault then.

      Thanks so much.
      GMFTatsujin

    5. Re:Easy fix by pjrc · · Score: 3, Insightful
      >Okay, I used to program call centers

      Ah. So it's all *your* fault then.

      It's really the fault of all those suckers who buy the damn products. If only they would stop buying, we could all live in peace and queit at dinner time.

      While I'm ranting, I'd really like to find those bastards who believe email that promises they can get rich quick, magically lose weight, get a loan with bad credit, etc.

      If only we could find and punish this tiny group of people, the rest of us would all benefit.

    6. Re:Easy fix by sehryan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Autodialer dials number from read-only database

      The database is read only for the most part from the agent point of view. However, there is a field at the end of each record that states the last disposition of that number. When the dialer (or an agent) hears the disconnected tone, the dialer adds its code for DISCONNECTED to that field for the record (usually some string of numbers, a la 404 for web).

      Upon pickup, it picks the next available agent, your info shows up on their computer terminal via application bridge from the switch to a computer on the LAN.

      The dialer is smart enough to recognize an answering machine, busy, all kinds of different things, including a live human voice. The amount of busies, disconnected or answering machines that get through to the agent is minimal. Otherwise you are paying your agent to do what your expensive dialer should be doing.

      If you hang up, agent gets dialtone, and they hit a button to flag they are available for the next call

      At this point, its up to the dialer admin what will happen to that number. He would have programmed the dialer's reactions to the codes when building the campaign. Usually that means deciding how long you are going to keep a number that is continually marked as busy or answering machine in the loop. We usually marked them out after 6 tries.

      DNCs do have to be flagged manually, but thats only so that if the number slips into another campaign, the dialer filters it out. Assuming your admin has coded DNCs right, they shouldn't be called again within that campaign, and won't be called again by that dialer once he adds them to the master DNC list.

      So in the end, TeleZapper can work.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    7. Re:Easy fix by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      I purchased a TeleZapper some months back. I was seriously skeptical, but I figured it would take the chance.

      The device apparently works by sending a fax answer tone when you pick up the tone. A lot of telemarketing dialers do in fact hang up when they get this tone - I guess they don't want to talk to a FAX :-) They also seem to remove the number from their lists, as the number of these calls has gone way, way down.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    8. Re:Easy fix by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I didnt read the article, but you could insert the first tone of a telecom's disconnected line signal on your answering machine, and automated systems will delist you."

      I did that once, thinking it was funny. Not only did I get delisted from telemarketers, I got delisted by my friends too. They had trouble understanding how I pulled off that trick with my answering machine.

    9. Re:Easy fix by sehryan · · Score: 2

      For the most part, answering machines start playing your message almost immediately after it picks up. When you answer the phone, assuming you are using a normal handset, you have to take the time to move it from the cradle to your ear before you say hello. Its that delay from pick up to talk that the dialer keys off of. The more delay, the more it will assume there is a real person on the other end.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    10. Re:Easy fix by AndroidCat · · Score: 2

      Hmm... That should be easy enough to test with a modified message on my answering machine. And why does Bell Canada give me a busy signal when their end hangs up? (The answering machine is smart enough to deal with it. I've not sure about my IVR software.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  4. That's great, but... by Runny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it work for my mother-in-law?

  5. It's simple by ChicagoFan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    How to avoid telemarketers:

    Requirements: 1 answering machine

    Turn the answering machine on, but set it so that you can hear the messages people are leaving. Then, screen every call. Period. If people start to leave a message, and it's a message you want, pick up the phone.

    Let people who you want to talk to, know that you screen your calls for this reason, so that they will leave a message.

    You are under no obligation to pick up the phone. Ever. Don't do it unless the call actually matters to you. And even if it does, but you're busy at the moment, let the machine take the call and you can call back later.

    The phone is there to serve you, not the other way around. I have let someone leave a message, just because I was in the coding zone at that moment, or enjoying an ice cream cone, or even awake-but-trying-to-nap, and didn't feel like picking up the phone. So I didn't.

    ChicagoFan

    1. Re:It's simple by ergo98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Turn the answering machine on, but set it so that you can hear the messages people are leaving. Then, screen every call. Period. If people start to leave a message, and it's a message you want, pick up the phone.

      Just so you know, most people ABSOLUTELY HATE THIS: If you made me listen through your bloody inane message, then give me the courtesy of leaving the message that I've already thought through and am in the process of leaving as you stumble on the phone, blessing me with the sacred pick-up. If you want to screen calls use call display, but it's considered incredibly rude to overtly screen calls by making people do the lame ass "Hello? Hello? You there...it's me". On the flip side, now I have to deal with people leaving messages on my real answering machine (not used to screen, but rather when I'm not answering the phone) always starting it off with 30 seconds of pleads for me to pick up. Grrr.

      However, I otherwise agree with your philosophy: Many people have been brought up to consider the phone some god like communication device for which everything else must be dropped.

    2. Re:It's simple by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      I've done this for quite some time after getting flooded with telemarketer calls.

      I have a message on my machine saying that ALL incoming calls are recorded and to leave a message. I keep it under 10 seconds so people don't have to wait through a long message.

      People who REALLY want to get ahold of my quickly will call my cell phone (unlisted of course). Those who don't have my cell number are not my friends/colleagues, and can leave a message unless I feel like picking up (not likely).

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    3. Re:It's simple by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

      Bravo!

      This is EXACTLY the method my wife and I use! The outgoing message is short and to the point and all our friends are now more or less trained to know that if they leave or start to leave a message we will either pick up the phone or call them back right away. I know that this annoys some people, but too bad! The phone that I pay for exists for MY convenience, not theirs! You'd be amazed at the number of hangups we get in a day, usually right around dinner time.

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    4. Re:It's simple by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      The answering machine solution SUCKS. I HATE it when someone I know does this.

      Instead, spend a few more bucks and get a REAL phone system. For about $100, you can get one. The call goes like this. The system answers after the second ring (to get caller ID info), and plays a message which can say "If this is a sales call, hang up now. For John, press 1. For Lisa, press 2." If the caller presses a number, the call rings through to your actual phone with caller ID info. It can do selective ringing for different people in the house. If the person doesn't pick up, it goes to voicemail.

      I don't have the name of this box, but one of my friends has one and so does my brother. Search google.

    5. Re:It's simple by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Uh, what century are you in? My calls go straight to my machine, and my message is me saying "Beep" (if you don't know who you're calling, I'm sure as hell not going to tell you), which means a shorter wait than waiting for me to pick up. All of my friends and family use each other's machines as speakerphones, on the assumption that the other person is there and listening and will pick up half way through. If not, then nothing lost, they just hang up after saying their piece. If it turns out that I was there screening, then it's just as quick for me to call them back as it is for them to sit there going "Did you get that? Are you there? Hello?"

      It's a remarkably efficient system, you just need to get used to it and learn - and teach - how to use it effectively. It does require some thought, but not much. For example, if you pick up in the middle of someone's speech, don't make a big deal of it and interrupt them with "Hi! I'm here!". Wait for a natural pause and then just reply as though they were talking to you all the time (which they were). They soon get used to it and forget that they're speaking to a machine some of the time. Seriously, if my mother can re-learn how to use the phone, you can too.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    6. Re:It's simple by rakerman · · Score: 2

      Requirements: 1 caller ID

      If you don't recognize the caller, don't answer.
      Let them go to voicemail.
      That's what I do.

      Also: replace your phone with a cellphone only.
      I think (since you pay for calls you receive), telemarketing to cell phones is illegal, at least in some parts of the US and Canada.

    7. Re:It's simple by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      it's considered incredibly rude to overtly screen calls by making people do the lame ass "Hello? Hello? You there...it's me".

      Up yours. Caller ID works for shit in California (IMO there should not be any caller ID blocking; If you want anonymity, use a payphone) as many areas STILL don't support it properly, and most people in California have their ID turned off by default.

      I'm going to continue to screen calls with my answering machine, and if you don't like it, don't call me.

      Of course, people usually just hang up on it, so whatever they were calling about must not have been worth my time. If it's not worth a few seconds for them to leave a message, it's not worth it to me to pick it up.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  6. Oh dear... by Komrade+S. · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The Phone Butler takes over, delivers his legally-correct message in a very polite, British-butler's voice, then terminates the call automatically when he is done!"

    I'm not sure if I'd even wish that upon a tele-marketer...

    --

    s200.org - visit it (me), love it (me).

    1. Re:Oh dear... by Draoi · · Score: 3, Funny
      And from their site;

      This "mini-computer" uses state-of-the art technology

      A mini-computer - wow! Can you imagine how much power that thing must draw? Cutting-edge technology ...

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    2. Re:Oh dear... by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny
      Two words...

      Beowulf cluster.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  7. There are no telemarketers by Quila · · Score: 5, Funny

    All those calls were faked by the phone company for years so that you'd get pissed off enough to pay $4 more per month to make them stop.

    1. Re:There are no telemarketers by dattaway · · Score: 3, Funny

      All this time I thought it was a conspiracy by telemarketers to sell me privacy devices.

  8. Don't answer the phone... by Ridge · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just don't answer the phone. I have a handy device known as an "answering machine." This device answers the phone on my behalf and allows me to hear what the other party has to say. I then can decide if I want to take call. I call this process "screening my calls." I've found it to be most useful. Previously, I received numerous wrong number calls, or worse, telemarketers. I've found that very rarely do telemarketers talk to my wonderous machine. However, when they do, I've found it effective to quickly "answer and hang up."

    I've already applied for a patent on the "answering machine", the "screening calls" process, and the "answer and hang up" process. If you infringe on my patents expect numerous calls from lawyers...

  9. MY High-Tech solution by BrK · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use a Stargate to handle my incoming calls. I can filter on any CallerID string, including Private and Unavailable numbers, and play a custom outgoing message, based on the time of day, day of week, CID, temperature outside, etc.

    Telemarketers and other nusance callers get a SIT tone, a "DO NOT CALL THIS NUMBER" message, and then a click.

    On sundays, the custom filters are disabled (telemarketers legally can't call on Sundays).

    You can find .WAV files of SIT tones on the 'net, just adding the "disconnected number" tones to the beginning of your answering machine message will accomplish the same thing that many of the $40 gadgets do.

    --
    -This sig intentionally left blank
    1. Re:MY High-Tech solution by BrK · · Score: 2

      The Stargate is about $1000
      The LCD Keypads they picture are about $300
      The Add-On interface for IR Control is about $300

      You can order all the crap online at http://www.worthdist.com (no affiliation).

      Yeah, it's costly just for call-handling, but as an overall home controller it's not a bad price (technically still a bit too spendy, but the options are somewhat limited).

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
    2. Re:MY High-Tech solution by bani · · Score: 2

      The WAV files of SIT tones "on the 'net" don't work!!

      One is off-key and doesn't properly trigger SIT detectors. The other is so warbly and distorted that it doesn't properly trigger SIT detectors either.

      I ended up recording my own by dialing an unassigned number and recording the resulting SIT tone from the telco. *THAT* one properly triggers SIT detectors.

    3. Re:MY High-Tech solution by BrK · · Score: 2

      Well, I don't know where you were looking, but via a google search, I managed to find a huge collection of SIT's on the net that work perfectly for me. Wish I had kept the URL handy, but the .WAV's were arranged by tone type (busy, disconnected, etc), and also by ILEC (Verizon, Pac Bel, SBC, etc).

      --
      -This sig intentionally left blank
  10. caller ID=dream come true by nizo · · Score: 2

    While it still annoys me to check and see calls from "Unavailable", you can't beat caller ID, since none of the telescammers ever call with their real ID/phone number. Without caller ID I would have to go back to my old technique of using the air horn on em when they called (which tended to annoy my neighbors at 9pm). And still to this day I have yet to get one of them to give me their supervisors home number, so I could bug him/her while they are eating dinner to discuss my athletes foot problem.

    1. Re:caller ID=dream come true by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      While it still annoys me to check and see calls from "Unavailable", you can't beat caller ID, since none of the telescammers ever call with their real ID/phone number.

      Actually you can beat caller ID blocking but only if you have the right type of line.

      When caller ID was introduced for residential customers there was an immediate outcry over its abuse by telemarketers. So the telcos and the FCC conspired to set up a scheme to allow the abuse to continue while claiming there was an opt out.

      Commercial services can access a caller-ID service called AIN. 800 numbers use AIN to decide whether to take a call. AIN is not affected by caller ID blocking.

      What we need is to hold the politicians feet to the fire, stop them taking the bribes from the telemarketer industry and demand that they serve us.

      The current bogus 'opt-out' for caller ID is actually a benefit for telescum. If only telemarketers and crank callers used caller id blocking we could use it to block telemarketers. The problem is that the telemarketers have conned people into providing them with camoflage, I don't know if a blocked number is from a telemarketer or someone who thinks blocking might hinder telemarketers.

      Another problem with caller id blocking is that it only seems to work for the telemarketers. I get calls from people who think they have blocking all the time and their caller id shows up on the phone. The FCC shills have probably agreed with the telemarketer scum that you have to repeat the request to opt out every year. Also the system does not differentiate blocked numbers from numbers comming from non caller id exchanges, like foreign calls.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  11. Bloody Telemarketers by T-Kir · · Score: 5, Informative

    My brother & family moved into a nice new house last year... and as soon as the phone was set up, BANG! Telemarketers left right and bloody center.

    He ended up installing this system (I'm not there so I couldn't tell you what it is) that will reroute all calls without Caller ID to an automated system so calls can be screened, callers have to give their name or business name and then the system literally calls the house itself to say "person or company x" is calling.

    The number of telemarketing calls went through the floor, mainly because most didn't want to go through the screening check. They get the odd call now and then, but mostly by those who do persevere with the screening system or those that have valid Caller ID tags.

    Originally he did have the system completely rejecting calls without ID, but since the rest of the family live in England, there isn't any ID transmitted - so we couldn't get through for a while, until we got a call from him wondering why WE hadn't called!! DOH!

    --
    Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    1. Re:Bloody Telemarketers by sirinek · · Score: 2

      Thats not something people have to install, its something you can order from the phone company (at least in most parts of the US) It goes by names like Privacy Manager (I forget which telco calls it that)

      I had it in Chicago, where SBC/Ameritech's piss-poor Caller ID didnt pick up many callers numbers and company's numbers, and so it worked like a charm. No telemarketers got to me.

      Now I am in Atlanta and ordered the same type of feature, but BellSouth's caller ID service gets almost every caller's number, so they slip through this system and make my phone ring. Rather annoying.

      It seems that I can't have the best of both worlds; Caller ID thats worth a damn, AND automatic blocking of telemarketing calls! ;-)

      siri
      http://www.sirinek.com

    2. Re:Bloody Telemarketers by Alioth · · Score: 2

      Funnily enough, I have some friends in the United States. They used to show up as just "Call" (on my Pronto cellphone service (Isle of Man)) but as of a couple of weeks ago, their number has started showing up on my cellphone when they called - so I think international caller ID is starting to happen.

    3. Re:Bloody Telemarketers by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • since the rest of the family live in England, there isn't any ID transmitted

      Ahem. There's a BT standard CLID tag on it, which is different from the CLID used by the rest of the world, for reasons that could only be described as imbecilic. Don't get me started on the joys of working on PBX's that have to work with that musty old monopololy's warped ideas of what constitutes a 'phone network.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  12. Opt-in vs. opt-out by e8johan · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is really silly that you need to opt-out to try to get away (and you still get calls even then). If there would be an opt-in it would probably kill off the whole telemarketing business, which I feel would be a good thing.

    This problem is just as bad as spam, fax-spamming and all other broad adverticement methods. I wish that one day you would not get more ads than you ask for (i.e. 2-5% of todays load of shit).

    For you people living in Sweden I would like to mention the Nix register, it is the Swedish opt-out register.

  13. I Haven't Had a Telemarketing Call... by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since I had Qwest enable an anti-marketing feature they sell. Basically if the call would be "Unknown" on my caller ID box, the person calling gets a message that this line does not accept phone solicitations and if they're not a telemarketer, please dial their number now. It even seems to have worked for the Qwest telemarketers. Of course, that's an extra buck or two on the phone bill each month, but I've gone from 5-10 telemarketing calls a week to 0. Once my spam load gets obnoxiously high, I'll be implementing a similar solution for that.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  14. Why? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Okay, granted the UK isn't quite the same size as the US, but I've only ever had about 4 calls from marketeers in my whole life (and they were generally to do with double glazing).

    Would I be right in assuming that it's a side effect of the free local calls you guys get? Whilst the whole idea sounds rather tempting it just seems like you have a lot of hassles and issues with the whole system - especially when it's possible to buy 6 or 7 different call screening devices!

    Ps. the English accent on the Phone Butler really made me laugh :o)

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Why? by jhunsake · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Would I be right in assuming that it's a side effect of the free local calls you guys get?"

      No, most telemarketers call from out of state. They do however get deals from the long distance companies.

    2. Re:Why? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      Okay, granted the UK isn't quite the same size as the US, but I've only ever had about 4 calls from marketeers in my whole life (and they were generally to do with double glazing).

      There are two economic reasons, first call charges have been higher in the UK and second minimum wage labor is really cheap.

      The other reason is staff turnover. UK staff tend to drop cold calling jobs much more quickly because they are less likely to tollerate hostile responses which brits are much more likely to give. US types are trained to be polite to everyone, calling everyone sir and mam. That type of forelock tugging has been absent from the UK since we discovered trades unions.

      If a telemarketer does get a polite response it is often from an OAP who just wants to talk to someone.

      A final reason is that the successful response rate is much much lower, particularly since most people have double glazing these days.

      The problem with telemarketing in the US is that too many people respond.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:Why? by MartinB · · Score: 2
      The other reason is staff turnover. UK staff tend to drop cold calling jobs much more quickly because they are less likely to tollerate hostile responses which brits are much more likely to give. US types are trained to be polite to everyone, calling everyone sir and mam. That type of forelock tugging has been absent from the UK since we discovered trades unions.

      You've not worked in or for a professional call centre, then. Pro call centres pay pretty well (especially for OB sales calls), and are damned sure to script everything, including an appropriate level of politeness. They also train the call agents extremely highly. In a good call centre, you don't get a high level of turnover, and you don't get agents being anything but very polite.

      If a telemarketer does get a polite response it is often from an OAP who just wants to talk to someone.

      As someone who's working on a telemarketing campaign targeted at older people (and yes, it's targeted and part of an ongoing relationship, not spam cold calling), I can tell you that that's a particularly patronising generalisation.

      A final reason is that the successful response rate is much much lower

      Depends on how well targeted your call campaign is. I've worked on campaigns with 95%+ response rates... because we didn't cold call, we called people with an ongoing warm relationship with the client. And we sold 50k+ cars on the back of it, sight unseen.

      See, if you're paying a callcentre x$CURRENCY_UNIT per DMC (Decision-maker contact), it pays to make sure they only call people who are likely to respond, which means people with a relationship with you already. It also pays to not piss off these people as their LTV (LifeTime Value) is not something to throw away.

      The problem with telemarketing in the US is that too many people respond.

      Strikes me that that negates the argument that telemarketing is a problem. This broadband internet access really annoys me - it's just too good. If people respond in droves, then it's not a problem, surely..?

      --

      The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

  15. Caller-id works by AppyPappy · · Score: 2

    If they show up an unknown, I let it roll to the answering machine. If it is someone I know, I just call them back or send an email. Everyone now and again, I will pick up and ask to go on the "Don't Call" list. We are down to one TeleMarketer a week now.

    I hate phones. They are the spawn of Satan. If you have something to say, use email. I guess part of it is coming from a corporate culture. In the corporate world, some people don't like email because it leaves evidence of their incompetence.

    But I digress...........

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  16. I just hope by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 2

    I just hope they won't try to sell me one by spamming my mailbox to its limit ;-)

  17. Do not call Registries by Trashman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Someone pointed out that there is no Federal "Do not Call Registry". However, Some States do have them. Find your state and Sign up.

    --
    Do not read this .sig
  18. Glad I live in Tennessee! by bpowell423 · · Score: 2

    Tennessee passed a Do Not Call law some years back. The state maintains a Do Not Call list, which is free to join. By state law telemarketers must abide by it, with stiff penalties if they don't. I signed up and have had zero telemarketers call since. That was about 2 years ago. Any other states (or other countries, for those outside the USA) have anything similar?

    1. Re:Glad I live in Tennessee! by gotaltitude · · Score: 2, Informative

      Colorado recently instituded a no-call list - www.coloradonocall.com. It's gotten a lot of attention recently, especially since they are really going after non-compliers.

  19. Ever tried audio caller id? by dmorin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I love this feature of my phone. I can attach sound bytes to known numbers, so that when the phone rings and we're at dinner the phone might say "It's my parents!" and we know whether or not to get it. MUCH better than standard caller id where you have to get up anyway and go look at the box to see who it is. If the phone doesn't tell me who it is (top 10 most important callers), then we just don't answer it. Not to mention if it's my wife's parents then I don't have to get up. :) Who was it that asked for a mother-in-law screener?

    Plus, the machine also has a feature to send caller-id-blocked numbers right to voice mail (after a special message). The neat thing is listening to the different kinds of response -- some hang up during the "Your number is being sent to voice mail..." which tells me that it's a human calling. Some wait through the message, and then there's a pause, and then a click and a dial tone, which suggests to me that it's a machine that waited a certain amount of time and then gave up.

  20. Don't do it with an automated gaget by Sc00ter · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It's been said before, but ask to be put on a do-not-call list. Keep track, and if they call you back, SUE!

    You don't think you can get money from these scumbags? Think again. Friend of mine has gotten $1500 (if not more). See here: http://osiris.978.org/~brianr/telemarketing/

    Most of the time they're in another state and it's far more expensive for them to send somebody to represent them in small claims court then it is to just pay you the $500.

  21. DMA opt-out by tbmaddux · · Score: 2
    My low-tech solution. First, an unlisted phone number has proven to be cheap and effective. Second, write to the DMA to opt-out.

    Telephone Preference Service, Direct Marketing Association, P. O. Box 9014, Farmingdale, NY 11735-9014

    More tips at Junkbusters. Now we tend only to get long distance phone company calls.

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  22. Doo-doo-doot gadgets also stump public libraries by vaxer · · Score: 4, Informative

    I work for a group of public libraries that uses a computer to call and say "Someone at this telephone number" -- we won't say who, because if you use a public library we consider it your own damn business -- "has an item waiting to be picked up at the So-and-So Public Library".

    Unfortunately, if you use one of those gadgets that sends a "this number has been disconnected" message, the library's computer takes that at face value. You miss picking up the book, and then the library staff asks you to verify your phone number the next time you're there.

    So, yeah, it works, but sometimes a little too well.

  23. You guys are missing out! by somethingwicked · · Score: 3, Funny

    Really, on a boring night, it really can be a slightly entertaining trying to sell a telemarketer something YOU own.

    Thing is, you have to really push it and not make it sound like a joke. When they scoff and give a laughing no to buying your Miata, use their tactics: Don't take no for an answer, incredulously ask why they would be interested in being a cool person with a cool car, ask where they live, how nice it would be to drive a convertible around, etc.

    You'll run THEM off the phone in no time.

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    1. Re:You guys are missing out! by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you don't think telemarketers are wasting your time ? Let me guess... you run some sort of Linux, correct ? ;)

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    2. Re:You guys are missing out! by somethingwicked · · Score: 2
      Okay, obvious troll, but I'll bite...

      I don't wait for them to call...BUT I am not sitting at home dreaded calls from people I can easily say no to. I am not screening EVERY damn call I receive with an answering machine just to avoid the occassional sales pitch. We have enough friends that call that the phone ringing is normally a good thing.

      And yes, My wife had a Miata and looked damn fine in it...and it was a blast to drive

      --

      ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    3. Re:You guys are missing out! by kilonad · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's more fun to try and convert door-to-door Mormons to Buddhism. I tried it once this past winter, you should have seen the look of confusion on their faces! For added fun, explain to them how you can be Buddhist *and* Christian at the same time. :)

  24. I have a cell phone by wiredog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So far, telemarketers haven't started calling it. Everyone who is likely to call me knows that number. I have the ringer turned off on the landline, and just check the answering machine every evening. The only reason I have a landline is for 911 service.

    1. Re:I have a cell phone by Enry · · Score: 2

      Telemarketing calls to cell phones are illegal.

    2. Re:I have a cell phone by transient · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've heard that it's actually illegal to make telemarketing calls to a cell phone. Something about how you are paying for the call. In fact, I've received one spam call on my cell phone, and as soon as I said the magic words "cell phone", they apologized profusely and hung up.
      --

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    3. Re:I have a cell phone by EricWright · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then you should cancel your phone service. If you have a landline connected to your house/apartment/etc. there are typically 2 phone numbers you can still call. The phone company that owns the line, and 911 (at least that's been true in the RTP area of NC).

      Back in my college/grad school days, I moved every few months, and I always called the phone company to set up service from the new apartment itself. The poor phone reps got so confused when I told them that I was calling from my apartment to set up service at my apartment. Apparently, no one told them that this would actually work.

    4. Re:I have a cell phone by EricWright · · Score: 2
      a) The phone company (pacbell) would not give me DSL without a land line.
      I don't doubt your first point... I use cable modem, and am not even considering dropping cable service. Although, if I did, RoadRunner recently raised their rates $5 and dropped the requirement that you maintain basic (or better) CATV service. Used to be, you paid an extra $20/month for RR if you didn't have a cable subscription (basic cable only costing around $13-15/month).
      b) Land line minutes are cheaper than cell minutes.
      This all depends on how much you place/receive phone calls. I talk with most people online with some sort of IM. I may spend half an hour a week on the phone.

      I already have a cell phone with 350 anytime minutes and 1000 night/weekend minutes free with the plan I'm on. I never use these up, so I never pay more than the original plan anyway.

  25. Why it's good to live in PA by plazman30 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Pennsylvania recently passed the "No Calls Please" law, where, if you register with the state, you are added to a do not call list and Telemarketers have to download the list and remove you from their database if you're on it. Adding yourself to the list is free!
    When a telemarketer actually does call me, I explain to them about the law. A lot of telemarketers actually tell me they don't believe me. I then ask to speak the supervisor on duty because I need to get the companies name and address in order to report them to my attorney general so they can be fined $5000 for disturbing me. They usually hang up real fast and don't bother me any more.

    What we really need is an active law NO ONE in PA can receive telemarketing calls unless they ADD themselves to a list.

    1. Re:Why it's good to live in PA by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

      NO ONE in PA can receive telemarketing calls unless they ADD themselves to a list.

      This would put a quick end to the old BS line: "Our clients ENJOY hearing about our products and services!" I want to puke every time I hear that...especially from spammers.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    2. Re:Why it's good to live in PA by WCMI92 · · Score: 2

      "What we really need is an active law NO ONE in PA can receive telemarketing calls unless they ADD themselves to a list."

      But the marketers KNOW no one will ever do this, which is why they want "opt out".

      It's interesting to compare the attitude towards human beings that marketer tyoes have, and compare it to the Nazis, in a way.

      They callously disregard the desires of their "targets", and have no respect for them.

      Do you want to patronize a company that starts it's relationship with you on that basis?

      I for one have a damn good idea of what I want, and what I will buy. When I'm interested, I'll call YOU. Not one second before. I maintain a "do not BUY" list that roughly corresponds to the companies that telemarket me and SPAM me.

      My ultimate solution is very low tech. My phone line does not connect to a phone. It's data only. I have a cell phone that is off 90% of the time (leave a voice mail). Personal communications is supposed to exist for MY convienence, not the guy on the other end of the line. It's on when I want it on. It's off when I want it off. Leave a message. Maybe I'll call.

      --
      Corporatism != Free Market
    3. Re:Why it's good to live in PA by diverman · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, opt-in is something that law-makers seem to opt-out from. In most situations where companies can take advantage of contact information (obtained legally or illegally), they will use it. And law-makers continue to passively support this behavior of the corporate world.

      Is it good for the economy? I don't know. Maybe. Personally, I don't think it is so good for the economy that my personal life should be invaded to pay for it.

      This problem exists with "junk mail", telemarketting, and email. Any method where you normally receive information that is useful or personal to you has been invaded by companies. And often times they make it sound like you did something to initiate the call. This is a lie that they can often pass off as "a mistake".

      I even had one guy call me saying that I filled out some form about a year ago requesting information on something. Well, asside from the fact that I KNOW I didn't fill out any such form, I had just moved, and had that number for less than a month. Mistake? Maybe... but I SERIOUSLY doubt it.

      And what about those calls where it's clearly a recorded message, and the person tries to sound like they're really there by making "little mistakes", or seeming to "just remember" something. I thought it was pretty lame when I got the same exact message from two people. Or when I get the same call time and time again (recorded) even at different phone numbers.

      So, I think that people ought to make their voice more heard. Anyone up for class action law suits? Can one apply in this case? I'm sure if you destory a major telemarketting, and it gets some press, that others will be more careful.

      SPAM! In your mail box, on your phone, and in your email! Don't just accept it because some schmuck in office voted on opt-out, despite the obvious disagreement of the people they are supposed to represent. Fire the bastards! YOU employ them!

      Okay... soap box stance over. I think I'm going to see about following in the foot steps of the guy who threatened to sue them if they didn't send a small amount of money (relatively... $500). It would likely cost them more to have someone go to small claims court over it. And Christmas is just around the corner. *grin*

      Cheers,
      -Alex

  26. Re:my how-to for do not call list by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

    I will modify my behavior, pretending to be interested, so I can get the telemarketer's name and name of the company and ask to be removed from the list.

    That is what I do (when I feel like answering). Then I add them to my do-not-call-list list. If I get another call from them, I inform them that I had already asked to be placed on their DNC on what ever date the last call was made.

  27. Re:do not call list by hrieke · · Score: 2

    Simple solution for those who live in the USA: Get a cell phone and ditch your land line.
    By law telemarketers can not call you on your cell phone. I've recieved one or two calls in the past, so it isn't 100%, but it's worth it.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  28. Re:The Ultimate Solution - NO CALLS by RembrandtX · · Score: 2

    Umm
    That is a very 'Liberal' outlook.
    "Everyone should answer their phone .. its common courtesy"

    What kind of crack are you on ?

    You might as well say "Everyone should turn on their TV to channel 4 .. its common courtesy" or "Everyone should go to my web page and click my banner ad .. its common courtesy" or "Everyone should get all the money they need .. and rich people should pay for it .. its common courtesy"
    [ok .. maybe that last one was a little too far .. but that just proves how much telemarketers push me over the edge.]

    My phone , (last i checked) is in MY house .. and I pay MY money to operate it. What is sad .. is I also have a Cel phone .. and thats the only number I give out to friends .. I never give out our house phone number ,becuase 9 out of 10 calls are telemarketers. Thats becuase the people/businesses I gave it to lack "Common Courtesy" and placed me on call lists .. or sold my information to someone else.

    [for example .. I went home yesterday for lunch .. and had ELEVEN messages on my machine. all from telemarketing companies.]

    So explain to me again why I need to answer everyone of my phone calls .. when I *KNOW* that i don't even give that number out anymore ?

    If I don't want to talk to someone .. be they on my phone .. my front door .. or my computer - there is no rule of ediquette that says I have to cheerfully exchange the time of day to them.

    My telemarketing responses are generally along the lines of "Don't fucking call my house. Put me on your DO NOT CALL LIST - If you call my house again .. I will SUE you for harassment." [after obtaining their company information of course]

    either that .. or I tell them that the person they are looking for is dead.

    works like a charm.

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  29. Excuse me... Are you paying for this?? by nordicfrost · · Score: 3, Informative

    I often compare living in teh US to living here in Norway, Europe. It seems that we can learn a lot from each other, this time it is your turn to learn... ;)

    So. WHAT?!?! Are paying for hardware and services to stop telemarketeers? Aren't they obliged by law to check if your name is on a do-not-call list? A friend of mine in the US said that he had to pay to be on a do-not-call list, operated by the telemarketeers association. That is nothing short of insane. Paying people to not bother me? Hello; it's not very difficult to operate such lists.

    I'm on the Norwegian goverments do-not-call list. There are three levels: 1) Any call accepted. 2) Commercial calls not allowed. 3) Neither commercial nor charitable calls allowed.

    I'm already a member of the chartiable orgs i want to, so my do-not-call entry lists me as option 3. This is a free system, no fees. Any company that calls you even though you're on the list will face fines if you turn them in to the Consumer Council.

    I think this system is

  30. Re:Doo-doo-doot gadgets also stump public librarie by forgoil · · Score: 2

    What do you do if the person doesn't have a phone number? Or if they request to be contacted in another way than the phone? Or if their kid answers the phone and drops it back at once?

    I don't think it sounds like an especially good technology, no offense.

  31. Open Source Technique: Hang Up by zettabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll put this one in the public domain, so as we can all benefit from it:

    If you're in the mood, answer the phone. Answer with your name, e.g., "This is Doug." If there is a pause, or the person on the other end says, "May I speak with Mr. X", they are a telemarketer (in all likelihood). The pause is a dead giveaway, and asking for me by last name means they don't know who I am.

    At this point, hang up the phone. No need to be polite and try to reason your way out of the call. Really. It's okay. These are professional telemarketers. This kind of rejection rolls off their back like water on a duck (Simpson's, Daryl Strawberry anyone?).

    If the call really was legitimate, they'll be calling back, although I haven't had a false positive using this technique yet.

    This technique is licensed under the GPL.

    Giddy Up.

  32. I'd rather fight 'em by squarefish · · Score: 2

    with a machete or an ax

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  33. Telephone / Mail / Fax Preference Services by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 3, Informative

    In the UK, you can register on-line with the Telephone Preference Service to avoid telemarketing calls.

    http://www.tpsonline.org.uk

    Similar services exist for Snail Mail

    http://www.mpsonline.org.uk

    and Fax.

    http://www.fpsonline.org.uk/

    The Data Protection register monitors these, and operates enforcement, so you can expect good results.

  34. Surely we can do better than this? by shic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would like to see a more high tech version of this running on a PC. I think it would be liberating to press a button and have an Eliza-like program take over the call from my end. Initially, it could ask the telemarketers to repeat everything several times... then play dumb for a while - asking for things to be repeated in more and more depth - then present an automated sales pitch for some ludicrous randomly chosen product - finally thanking the company for an amusing conversation - and hanging up. I think this would be a particularly effective anti-scam as a result of the way in which I suspect many call centres are run - I understand that those making the calls are required to be polite at all times and are frequently are required to follow strict rules about how they must direct conversations and answer questions. I'm having fun ideas about stock phrases like - "Very interesting - but I'm afraid I was distracted by my next door neighbours' cat - please could you repeat all that" on a rule where the caller has spoken for over 3 minutes. "I'm very interested in this idea - please would you wait while I get a pen I'm back again - what was it we were talking about again?" "Can you explain to me what you meant by that first bit again?" (The possibilities are only limited by our imagination :-)

  35. Unlisted numbers DONT HELP by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Informative

    I worked for a market research company. Our company would pick the area code and first 3 didgits of the phone numbers in the area we wanted to research, then our computers would randomly pick the last four digits. If you are unlisted or on a list, it doesn't matter. It is random. When I called someone who was unlisted it always puzzled the hell out of them how I got the number.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:Unlisted numbers DONT HELP by V.+Mole · · Score: 2

      Then the company you worked for is (probably) violating the law. (True in Texas and many other states.)

    2. Re:Unlisted numbers DONT HELP by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      I beleive that cold calling a random number isn't against the law. Using a computer to actaully place the call and deliver the message is.

    3. Re:Unlisted numbers DONT HELP by cdrudge · · Score: 2

      Sorry, since the original post was refering to the cost of having an unlisted number, I was only thinking about that.

    4. Re:Unlisted numbers DONT HELP by windex · · Score: 2

      Those laws actually go all the way back to the days of party lines and automated systems tying them up, and some telemarketers are trying to get rid of them.

      Not that I really want them to.

      *shrug*

    5. Re:Unlisted numbers DONT HELP by arkanes · · Score: 2

      let me just check if I have this right. It's illegal to randomly generate numbers, or to dial sequentially. But it IS legal to generate sequential (non-random) numbers, and then dial those in a random order?. I knew all Texans smoked pot, but seriously...

  36. Verizon's call intercept service rocks! by zerofoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    Info here.

    I used to get 7-10 telemarketer calls a week before this service, now i've got blissful silence. It is very worth the $4.00/mo. verizon charges.

    -ted

  37. New York State by wytcld · · Score: 2

    In six months of being on the New York State Do Not Call List I've found it quite affective, especially against AT&T cellular, which was calling at least every week despite being asked every time to take me off their list. You'd think a phone company would know federal law on this? Naturally I will NEVER buy anything from AT&T - and urge you not to either. Meanwhile, this is one gov. program NYS actually runs well - perhaps the only one.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  38. Caller ID blocking: by hrieke · · Score: 2

    Here's something to think about- maybe someone with a bit more time on their hands could tackle this problem and make a mint.
    911 calls can not be blocked by the *67 code- your number will always show up, 800 numbers also always show the caller's number.
    So what is it with the caller ID program on my cell phone, or the call ID box that my mother has that listens to the PRIVATE / BLOCKED code, and why can't it be reprogrammed to just show the caller's number always.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Caller ID blocking: by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

      Cause that info isnt being passed to your phone.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:Caller ID blocking: by Xeger · · Score: 2

      Up until a few months ago I had cell phone service through Cingular, and I noticed something peculiar: a blocked number would still show up correctly, if the number exists in my phonebook.

      When my mother called, for instance, the phone would display the name of her phonebook entry, "Mom@home," even though her caller ID at home is blocked.

      I hypothesized the following cause: Cingular, being a national carrier, probably owns its own national network of landlines. When someone places a call to a Cingular customer, his exchange opens a virtual circuit with one of Cingular's exchanges and the call setup includes the caller ID information as well as a "do not reveal identity" flag--this is necessary, of course, for 800 numbers and 911 to see your caller ID even when it's blocked. Cingular honors the "do not reveal" request by instructing the cell phone not to display the number, but still passes it along.

  39. Fighting Telemarketers by Larkfellow · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to work as a telemarketer in the past (Don't mod me down because I needed a job...) and I've learned a few tricks to beat telemarketers.

    Do Not Call Lists: All telemarketing centers have a Do Not Call list. Two of them in fact. The first is required by law for the center to remove you from their calling list if you say the words "Put me on your do not call list" This information is entered by the telemarketer into the system and your name is then removed from the system for that Company.

    In many cases, A center will have multiple Companies that they do calling for. Requesting to be placed on the "Coperate Do Not Call List" will not only remove you from the list the telemarketer is calling for, but also any other company that the center does any telemarketing for at that time and in the future. That will help in making sure that the center does not call again in the future (Next time, try asking the telemarketer who they actually work for, usually it's not the one they're calling on behalf of.)

    As Well, in the United States, you as a consumer are protected by the "Telephone Consumer's Protection Act" (TCPA), which requires the telemarketer to give you the company name and telephone number where you can reach them. If they fail to do so at the end of the call (IE, if they think you hang up, and just don't say it even to dead air), then you have the right to sue the company for up to $10,000. Not all states fall under the same rules, so check out here for more info on it

    Some states also have what's call a no rebutal law, which should prevent the telemarketer from rebuting you (ie. saying "I understand your hesitation but..."), when you say "No" they have to end the call there. Check out your state laws to find out if you fall in this category as well.

    --

    -- Never monkey with another Monkey's monkey

  40. It's sad... by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2

    that we have to *buy* a device to get rid of an inconsiderate business practice.

    Seems to me if we had legislators with ANY backbone whatsoever this practice would not be allowed. I find it hard to believe that the american public actually WANTS telemarketing.

  41. Linux Telephone Answering Device by ksw2 · · Score: 2

    Software like this may help combat this in the future. Imagine your own computerized voice mail system... give you friends an access code (31337? *laugh*) and all other calls get diverted to a "Remove me from you list" type message.

  42. Getting rid of them by hoagieslapper · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best way to get rid of telemarketers? Tell them a joke.

    You "What has a small penis and hangs up side down?"
    Them "I don't know"
    You "A bat. What has a big penis and hangs up?"
    Them "I don't know"
    You *click*

    Since doing that our telemarketing calls drop dramaticly.

  43. Don't use land lines! by NineNine · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why are people still even using land lines? Cell phones are cheaper than land lines in most cases now. All I use my home phone for is for dialing out to the Net. I have no telephones connected to it at home, thus, no telemarketers.

  44. My experience by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 2

    Local phone companies like Verizon Communications offer enhanced caller-ID service, which intercepts any calls that show up as "out of area," "unknown," or other frequent telemarketer aliases.
    Callers are asked to record their name, then placed on hold as the recipient decides whether to take the call.


    I got this service 9 months ago. Calls from telemarketers went from 1-4 a night to none. Worth the US$5 a month, but it's still a shame that I *have* to pay not to be pestered.

    On a side note, it gave a few people from .uk a bit of a start when they called me after it was first activated.

    Phone: Privacy director. You have a call from.. ("What the in the hell is this poxy thing? Will you just pick up the phone!") ...press 1 to answer, etc.

    --
    /*drunk.. fix later*/
  45. A Quick Summary of These and Other Solutions by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Okay, I've glanced at the boxes in the article, and here's a quick run-down of what they look like, and why they still don't solve all the problems:
    • EZ Hangup - an annual-fee "opt-out" list, and a single-point device that tells telemarketers to fuck off
    • The Phone Butler - a device that lets you, from any phone in the house, tell telemarketers to "piss off" (British accent, donchaknow)
    • TriVOX - call screening device that requests callers to enter a code to "ring through" to the hosue
    • Screen Machine - not quite sure, looks similar to TriVOX. The linked site (and the manufacturer's site) are pretty skimpy on info.
    These are not, of course, the only solutions to the problem. Some other approaches (discussed here and elsewhere):
    • Do Not Call Lists - State, Federal, Industry, and Company-specific -- a list of numbers wishing to be left alone
    • Interrupt tone generators - The idea is to generate the "booo-dee-dweep" sort of sound you get when you call a number that's out of service, and the belief is that telemarketer dialers will hear that and remove your number from their DB. Nobody knows how many call-generating systems actually do this (it's probably a small number).
    • Call Screening with an Answering Machine - you still have to run downstairs to listen to the machine, and many telemarketers will just hang up and try again later
    • Caller-ID Rejection - Most telemarkters don't pass CID information (thanks, FCC, for dropping that requirement!), some legitimate organizations (some college dorms, for example) don't pass the info, and other telemarketers deliberately pass "appealing" names to entice you to answer.
    And what list of potential solutions would be complete without a list of why they all suck?
    1. Opt-Out Systems - They still have to call you once so you can tell them to leave you alone. Not all telemarketers follow the rules, and fighting back is difficult. Not all telemarketers are even bound by the rules (there are a lot of exceptions). Not all subscribe to industry-based lists (like the Direct Marketing Association). Proposed national Federal "opt-out" lists are riddled with exceptions, too, and still rely on callers actually bothering to obey the law. It's difficult to tell a recorded message (illegal, by the way) to place you on a do not call list.
    2. CID, Interrupt tones, answering machine screening, etc. - discussed above
    3. EZ Hangup - see #1, plus you gotta run to the phone where the EZ Hangup box lives
    4. Phone Butler - see #1
    5. TriVOX - Would be nice to have the ability to manually place numbers on the system so that friends, family, etc., calling from recognizable numbers can ring straight through
    6. Screen Machine - ??? Probably similar to #5.
    Of all these possible solutions, the TriVOX comes closest to what I've been hoping to find for about the last 10 years. The ideal solution, for me, would be:
    • Hardware solution that sits in my basement, between the outside world and all my inside extensions
    • Connects to a computer for inbound CID logging and configuration (including setup of whitelist and blacklist phone numbers)
    • Passes whitelist numbers straight through to internal extensions
    • Blocks blacklist numbers immediately with "do not call" request
    • Interrupts unrecognized numbers, before ringing inside the house, with user-recorded announcement giving callers the option to "hit 1" to ring through.
    • Tone-sensor to allow any extension in the house to interrupt a caller who has rung through and is still a telemarketer (ala Phone Butler)
    • (optional): capability to do multi-extension ringing ("hit 1 for david") or multi-mailbox voicemail (extra credit: record voicemail to computer and make available for software to include in email or web interface)
    I've always thought that this would make a great open source hardware project -- complex enough that it doesn't already exist, simple enough to be within the reach of hobbyist hackers.

    Like I said, the TriVOX comes VERY close to this, but is missing some key features (like the ability to whitelist friends and family). It is, however, very encouraging that we're finally getting close to being able to truly solve the problem. At least as well as can ever be done.
  46. But people keep buying their stuff :( by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 2, Informative

    The telemarketers numbers show that people buy the junk they sell. One of the people I work with has bought tons of stuff from them, including Direct TV, Carpet Cleaner, and weight loss stuff.
    So long as there are people like my co-worker, these guys are going to keep at it.

    As for me, I'm using the 3 tone way.

  47. Fun with Telemarketers by V.+Mole · · Score: 2

    Conversation 1:

    Telemarketer: "Hello, may I speak with the lady of the house?"

    Me: "Sure, hang on a second." Then I put the phone down and go on with whatever I was doing. Come back 10 minutes later and hang it up.

    Conversation 2:

    TM: "Hello, may I speak to to Mrs. Mole?"

    Me (sobbing): "No, she died last week. Is it important?"

    1. Re:Fun with Telemarketers by V.+Mole · · Score: 2

      You must have had a tougher breed of TMs than I ran into The few times I tried it, I got at least a sort of hesitatation, followed by "ummm", at which point I hung up. I vastly prefer the first game ("I'll get her"), as they *will* hang on for at least a few minutes, and I've potentially wasted as much of their time as they have mine. Of course, my time is much more valuable...

  48. This sounds like more trouble by ksplatter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know that getting those calls is really annoying but they do have a purpose. These businesses contain many employees. These employees have families and financial obligations. Once they are fired from there telemarketing jobs because the technology has killed the industry there are thousands of additional people unemployed in our country because some of us are too lazy to say " NO Thanks" when we get a call.

    1. Re:This sounds like more trouble by tweek · · Score: 2

      I bet you think the longshoremen have a valid complaint then because the new technology the companies wanted to institute would cost people jobs but make the companies more efficiant?

      It has nothing to do with laziness. It has to do with privacy and respect for another individual.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    2. Re:This sounds like more trouble by bnenning · · Score: 2

      Umm, saying "no thanks" to telemarketers has exactly the same effect on their bottom line as using technology to prevent the call from going through. Are you going to claim it's our moral duty to buy crap from these people so they can send their kids to college?

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
  49. Another angle not often considered by fishbowl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Employement.

    Nobody likes telemarketers. But we're talking about a *lot* of jobs. It sucks that people don't have actual skills, literacy, insights, money to invest, etc. But the bottom line is that call center jobs are sometimes the only game in town.

    The real problem is that the telemarketing industry is part of our welfare system...

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Another angle not often considered by denzo · · Score: 2
      I'd like to explore more into the economics of this subject. You said that telemarketting offers jobs that many people may not otherwise have. Fine, I can completely sympathize that the people are only doing this to bring bread to the table and buy nice things for themselves like the rest of us.

      However (and telemarketting isn't by any means the only industry that is guilty for this), their job is to get consumers to "consume" more by aggressive/shady tactics (rather than allowing traditional economics like the marginal propensity to consume to act itself out). What happens when consumption goes up is that the price of goods also have to go up, and thus inflation follows.

      Get rich quick schemes, telemarketting, credit card companies... they make some people filthy rich by making average consumers spend more than they would normally have. So by doing so, consumers have to earn more money in order to afford products at rising prices, and therefore have to get jobs that are even more aggressive in getting other consumers to spend their money (whether they have it or if it's debt). For this reason, I think it's economically irresponsible to condone telemarketting as a valuable source for jobs. I think we're measuring some of our economic successes in the wrong ways.

  50. Seperate Phone # by mjh · · Score: 2

    You know what I desperatly want? I want a seperate phone # that I give out ONLY on forms that I fill in, only to companies that request information from me. But I want the phone number to always be answered by my phone company's voice mail service. I don't want a line to my house. I don't want to pay all the extra crap. I just want a phone number that always goes to an answering machine. Which I will check from time to time.

    Then I'll give out my real phone number to all my friends and family. And my public phone number to anyone I don't know. Oh, also, my public phone number will be the one listed in the phone book. Oh, and I'll put callerid blocker on my real phone number.

    I'd be willing to pay about $10 a month for the extra number w/out a line to my house and the voice mail that operates on that number. But I'm not willing to pay $40 a month for a phone line attached to a $30 answering machine that comes to my house. That's too expensive.

    Anyone know of any phone company that does this?

    --
    Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
  51. Part of the problem... by Andy+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... is the people who answer the questions.

    I get very few telemarketing calls, maybe a dozen or so a year, but I object to them on principle so a couple of months ago I decided not to accept them in future.

    About a month ago I got a call and a very polite guy explained briefly who he was, what his company did (market research) and asked if I had a few minutes to answer some questions.

    I told him: "Actually I don't like taking part in these things, sorry."

    His reaction told me so much. Slight pause, then in a surprised tone: "You don't?"

    I imagine lots of people make excuses not to answer the questions, or they just say they don't have time or whatever, but judging from that guy's reaction I bet I was the first person to just say that I didn't want to take part.

    Maybe if more people make it clear to cold callers that they aren't welcome, they'll quit doing it. It's not like spam where the sender is pretty much anonymous. The cold caller is right there on the phone! Just tell them that their call isn't wanted.

    But remember that the person on the other end of the phone is just someone paid to sit at a desk and dial numbers and ask questions. No need to be rude to them. I'm sure they'd be doing a better job if they could get one.

    1. Re:Part of the problem... by mbourgon · · Score: 2

      Actual, I'll do market research stuff, it's the only type of calls like that I do. They find it odd when I AM willing to do it, most people aren't. (different group than yours, apparently) The trick is finding out which ones are Market Research and which ones are cold calling. The last one I got appeared to be from Nick at Nite / TV Land, and asked me all sorts of questions about cable. What cable channels I watched, which ones I remember seeing ads for, which shows I watched on each channel, etc.

      I had another one a few years ago (missed one and never got invited back - damn!) that involved going to a local convention center, looking at cars (including prototypes), evaluating what I liked and didn't like. No sales pitch, nothing being sold, just market research. And I got paid $50 for that one. Not bad for an hour's time, and hopefully I improved cars in the way I want.

      ObInsightful - the reason I talked to Market Research is that I'm definitely not the average viewer, and by speaking up, I inflate the numbers of people like me. Naive? Maybe. But worth the 5-10 minutes of time I spend each year doing it. Market research is one of the only ways to tell people exactly what you're looking for, and what you actually want.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  52. Missouri has one also by Fastolfe · · Score: 2

    I used to receive at least 1-2 telemarketing calls a week. After adding myself to Missouri's "no call" list, I haven't received a single telemarketing call in 6 months or so.

    This is the most effective measure, in my opinion, without irritating the hell out of family and friends that may live in an area that does not send caller ID information (such that they show up as "OUT OF AREA").

    Privacy Manager is a fairly rude piece of technology. It works, but I get quite a lot of legitimate calls sent through the system as well and I know they don't like it.

  53. Re:One way to avoid it all is to... by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 2

    Get an unlisted and unpublished phone number. This costs $6 a month in MN. Couple this with not giving out your phone number to people trying to give you something "for free", and you should be in the clear. I haven't had one telemarketing call since I got the number two years ago.

    YMMV. I've got an unlisted ph#, and it hasn't stopped them. OTOH, I've had the same ph# for over 7 years. Like an email address, there's a certain age:spam ratio. Of course, the second you apply for a credit card, set up a bank acct, get phone service, turn on your electricity, etc., you'll be on someone's list. It's yet another play in "You Can't Win Theatre". :(

    --
    /*drunk.. fix later*/
  54. Fun With Telemarketers! by toupsie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well some people do want these calls! This guy seems to have the most fun with them. I get a chuckle everytime I hear the calls he gets.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  55. Another method... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

    This is about an 80% solution, but it has worked fairly well for me. Within the past couple years, I've noticed that most, if not all, solicitation calls to my home are dialed by an automatic system that requires the sales person to pick up their line after they are notified that someone (me) is on the line. This leads to an annoying silence, followed by an even more annoying exchange: Me:"Hello, this is Scratch" Marketeer:...[silence]..."Hello? May I speak to Scratch please?" Anyway, I started using those periods of silence as my cue to hang up immediately. I never have to talk to a salesman, and I sometimes get the satisfaction of hearing them talking just before my phone hits the cradle. The drawback is that I don't end up on a "no call list," but I figure I'm going to keep getting calls anyway, from other companies.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  56. Missouri does also by Fastolfe · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have not had any telemarketing calls since signing up with it.

  57. Re:The Ultimate Solution - NO CALLS by RembrandtX · · Score: 2

    well
    *This* 'jerk' doesn't own a TV .. and I jog 10 miles a day if I can help it.

    it has nothing to do with my 'fat' ass and pause buttons .. and everything to do with the fact that I don't want some random stranger .. calling me at 8:00 at night .. trying to get me to change my long distance service.

    [Just an aside: I found myself wondering why you give the concept of a Fat person negative connotation. I don't see how body size or conditiong has ANYTHING to do with how good of a person someone is. Or answering the phone for that matter .. but thats just pouring salt now.]

    If I want to change my long distance carrier .. believe me .. i have the ability to dial their number myself.

    As to your equation of
    Answer Phone = Obtain More Friends
    Again .. your arguing a non-sequter

    I don't see ANY direct corolation to picking up telemarketing calls obtaining me more/better friends.

    Personally, I prefer to spend time with my friends *DOING* something .. not talking on the phone.

    *MY* whole point here .. is that telemarkers call my phone more often than legitimite callers do.

    And if you extracted your head from your posterior .. you might have made the intuitive leap that:

    a) in order to know that 1 in 10 calls are telemarketers *I HAVE TO ANSWER ALL TEN CALLS*
    b) in order to be asked to be removed from their list *I HAVE TO ANSWER ALL TEN CALLS*

    *knock knock* Did I make any statements that said "What I like to do is NOT answer my phone, especially when friends call .. that way I can cackle maniacally with a ringing phone in the background as I take them for granted."

    What I DO see .. is you .. calling me a "bad person" with no friends because I don't seem to fit your moral values of "Be Kind to Telemarketeres and Turn the Other Ring."

    If wanting my privacy respectes makes me a jerk .. Than I'm the biggest-loudest-motherfuckerest-jerk you'll ever meet.

    Oh .. and if a driver ahead of me sits still at a green light for more that 10 seconds .. I honk my horn too ! TAKE THAT !

    *grin*

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  58. Understanding telemarketers by Rebar · · Score: 5, Interesting
    IANAT, but it's a seriously lousy job. Turn-over average is two weeks (from my memory of a local telemarketing firm). Mostly they are college-aged looking for some well-paying temporary work. The stress levels are incredibly high, between the call quotas and the hostile people being called.

    Here's what YOU can keep in mind, to avoid the need for any high-tech solution:

    • The people calling you have to be able to not take your comments personally, or else they will not last as a telemarketer. You are wasting your time trying to be cute. If they have a thin-skin, they will realize that it's not the job for them in short order, without your help.
    • You are doing them a FAVOR by saying "not interested" or "put me on your do-not-call list" and HANGING UP. They can then get on with their list and you can get on with your life. You can even be rude with a clear conscience since you are doing them a favor by terminating the call as soon as possible. You don't have to say anything at all; just hang up. My suppertimes got much easier once I realized that cold-calls don't have to be a source of stress for me.
    • Telemarketing isn't cheap, and the telemarketing firm doesn't want to call you if you aren't going to buy. There's a FREE(*) telemarketing opt-out list in the U.S. run by the Direct Marketing Association, and it works. Use the Google to find it; it's well worth your time if you don't want to be called by long-distance or credit-card companies at supper time.

    Before you flame me, realize I am not apologizing for telemarketing. I wish I could make the entire concept disappear with a wave of my hand, but I can't; telemarketing is too profitable to just go away. "There's a sucker born every minute", after all.

    (*)Well, last I checked it was free if you sent them a letter for the cost of a stamp, and $5 if you register on-line (to keep you from registering all your friends and family and the phone book presumably).

  59. My solution - be nice by gosand · · Score: 3, Funny
    I had a new take on dealing with telemarketers. Instead of my usual (talking to them for a second, then just putting the phone down), I was going to ask them their name, then while they went through their routine I was going to start looking them up on the internet. (DSL is great). But my wife scolded me for that idea, saying that no good would come of it, except for my sick enjoyment.

    So I keep a pad of paper by the phone. When they call, I ask the person their full name, and I have them spell it. I ask them the name of their company. Then I politely say "I want you to take me off of your list, and never call here again". They are used to dealing with aholes, but they aren't so used to dealing with someone who takes down all their info and speaks nicely but firmly with them. They get a little freaked when you ask for their name, but they usually give it to you. Now THEY are tied to the call, so they have a vested interest in not pissing you off. As we all know, people are a lot more bold when they are Anonymous Cowards.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  60. Re:The Ultimate Solution - NO CALLS by RembrandtX · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Last I checked .. it encourages open communication when people RESPONDED to posts .. not modded them down because they didn't agree with them.

    You can mod this post if you wish .. however .. at least I'm not a Karma Whore and I dont hide Anonymously.

    Really though, What happened to the idea that this was a DISCUSSION board.

    One gentleman states 'contrairy to popular opinion' that everyone should TALK to all the telemarkers [which .. technically .. could almost be -1 OFFTOPIC since the article is about telemarking stopping MACHINES - not about everyones opinions on telemarketers.] And I refute his opitnion opening it for discussion.

    How exciting would /. be if everyone who didnt say 'Ayup- thats right on' got modded down ?

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  61. What I would like is by clickety6 · · Score: 2

    ...the heavy breather box. When the telemarketer calls it answers and breathes heavily for a few minutes, then, if they persist, it asks what colour panties they are wearing. Then, if they still don't hang up, it akss them for a phone number and arranges a date for you :-)

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  62. Re:The Ultimate Solution - NO by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

    It's a common courtesy to answer every single phone call you can.

    Other examples of common courtesy:

    1. Replying "Thanks, have a nice day." when someone says "No thankyou", instead of immediately shifting down to paragraph C of your script.
    2. Leaving a message on my machine when I'm away, something like "I'm trying to sell you X. I'll call back later." instead of just hanging up. I can tell when I'm on a marketer's hotlist, because I get 6 or 8 hangups on my machine in one day.
    3. Not forcing a conversation on me in the middle of the only 4 hours a day I get to spend with my wife.

    The bottom line is that telemarketing techniques are rude and invasive. I'm polite to everybody who calls, but I will take any step to get them out of my life, including not answering the phone.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  63. The EZ Hangup link you provide is a scam by bobtroy · · Score: 4, Informative

    The link in the posting for EZ Hangup links to a site that's running a scam. Zenith's EZ Hangup is a $10 product--I have one. For $49.00, the site hangupnow.com is offering you one Zenith EZ Hangup device and a "free" listing on the "national do not call list" (a $39.00 value). On top of that, there is no national do-not-call list--they're advertising a private service that contacts telemarketers to have your number removed, and it is doubtful they even do that much (particularly since their FAQ highlights that you may still receive calls, and the service has no guarantee).

  64. Just Say No by Mignon · · Score: 2
    I live in New York State and signed up for the Do-Not-Call list, which seems to have cut back the number of calls I get. However, for the ones that make it through, if I'm out, most telemarketers don't leave messages. If I'm in, most telemarketers have a hard time pronouncing my name, and I can usually tell they're calling from a room full of other telemarketers, so it's pretty easy to tell it's an unwanted call. So I listen as they say something like, "Hello, may I speak to ... uh ... Mig - non?"

    Then I say "No," and hang up.

  65. It's very simple by joshv · · Score: 2

    Answer every telemarketing call politely, and quickly say "I am not interested, please put me on your do not call list" and hang up. Do this consistently for several months and the call volume will drop to almost nothing.

    Try it - it works.

    -josh

  66. Re:NY Post on firefighter charity by vegetablespork · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Those organizations, as you probably already know, have a very loose (if any) affiliation with law enforcement (or the fire department, or ambulance service, or what have you), and the causes they're trumpeting receive little (if any) of the funds raised.

    I actually had one of the vegetable level people, when I declined to participate once (before Caller ID and before my answering machine message started with the special information tones) say "I hope nothing happens to your house." Sinister, indeed.

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  67. Tyranny of the ring- Don't pick it up! by mekkab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chicago fan is RIGHT on the money with this one.
    I'm not gonna go into a mini-rant about how we interrupt EVERYTHING for the phone and have become slaves to communication technology, cuz I don't believe it.

    But if it REALLY bugs you you can screen your calls. Have a very short Outgoing Message.

    My parents do this, My wife does this, I sometimes do this (or I'll just wait 3 rings and pick up- usually those multi-calls just drop the trunk when they get someone ELSE to pick up!)I don't need the WAshington Post to call me up on a sunday morning, twice, when I already get 7 day service! Infact I won't even answer a doorbell ring if I'm not expecting anyone.

    But mekka b! What if it is your long lost friend and they had an accident just down the road in in their last dying breath they crawled to your door?
    Hmmm, possible, but not probable. More probably, it is some schmuck trying to sell me something door to door. Empirical evidence states that you are probably someone who I don't want to waste my time on becuase I can't bill my lost time to your account. Fuck off.

    But for some reason many (like the guy before me) will SLAM you for how inconsiderate it is to force him to suffer through your message! Well I got news for you buddy, if you don't want to listen to the machine, don't leave a message and don't call. I'm not crying over it.

    Besides, if you want instant communication, send me an e-mail! I'm always on line!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Tyranny of the ring- Don't pick it up! by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      You are absolutely right. If I had mod points I would have shoved you up to +5 Insightful already, but I don't. Oh well...

      For the people who still think in computerspeak: An answering machine is like a spamassassin equivalent to the phone system. You rarely get false positives, and it's usually right on the money to weed out telemarketer calls. It's got the best AI behind it, namely a human screening the calls.

      ;-)

  68. Put it in the phone by bugzilla · · Score: 2

    I just want a phone that I can tell not to ring if the call shows up on caller-id as "out of area" (or unavailable or whatever).

    But, in the meantime, I have that anti-telemarketer option from Qwest and I'm on the Colorado No-Call list. Before it went active, I'd receive up to 20 "out of area" rings on my phone in a day. Since the list went active I haven't received a single one. Very nice.

  69. Re:The Ultimate Solution - NO by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

    Bit offtopic, but...

    Annoying, but true. People have been so brainwashed into "answering the phone before it stops ringing" that the phone seems to have priority over everything else.

    The one that really irks me is when I'm the flesh and blood customer in a store and the clerk dealing with me runs off to answer the phone (and gets trapped into some 5 minute conversation with an idiot) when I'm the one who was there first.

    Sorry folks, but if you have a living customer in your store, the person on the phone can call back later. I've called a couple of salespeople on this and it genuinely seemed to surprise them. Likewise, it generally surprises me when they ignore the phone to deal with me first.

    N.

    --
    "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  70. Re:do not call list by psychosis · · Score: 2

    I keep getting calls with automated messages (against the law) trying to sell me something in a foreign language I don't understand (Farsi or Punjab, I think) on my cell phone.
    Already lodged a complaint with the FCC after being told I would be put on the DNC.
    Bastards.

  71. Telemarketer Response by msheppard · · Score: 4, Funny

    I take one of the following tactics, depending on my mood:

    ONE The legal approach, which could probably make you some (odd todd voice) Money.
    Ask this question:"What company do you work for?"
    Write down the answer, or don't... unless you want to try to get them, write down the date as well.
    Read this to them:
    "In accordance with the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 I formally request you put me on your do not call list. Any repeated calls to this phone number will result in legal action against your company. Do you understand?"
    Then hang up

    TWO The fun approach, start asking them random survey questions, and expand on the answers. The goal here is to find out what kind of people are in the world with no worry of their opinon of you. Keeping them on the phone raises their long distance bill too I guess...
    What kind of computer do you own?
    What operating system do you have on it?
    Have you heard of linux?
    How much memory does your system have?
    What type of internet connection do you have?
    What browser do you use?
    Do you own or rent?
    What type of car do you drive?
    Do you smoke cigarettes?
    -Or any slashdot poll...

    THREE Make them listen, If I am doing something like playing the piano/guitar or listening to music, I usually just put the phone down without hanging up. I've had people listen to me play the piano for about 20 min without hanging up. Pathetic part is they go right into the pitch after that, as opposed to, "That really sucked, why don't you take some lessons"

    FOUR, Two year old, Give the phone to my two year old, she doesn't have a credit card yet.

    FIVE, Porn Read them something from the Penthouse Forum, or make something up along those lines.

    SIX Turrets syndome, don't hang up, listen to response.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  72. Re:The Ultimate Solution - NO CALLS by RembrandtX · · Score: 2

    See .. now i see where our disconnect was.

    I didn't really make it clear that my family & friends call my cel-phone.

    [which is part of the reason I have a cel phone .. as my family is getting older .. medical emergencies come up a lot more frequently .. and with my cel, they can get me anywhere anytime. BOY is it scarey when that thing wakes me up at 3:00 am.]

    But to play devil's advocate .. it takes a telephone 45 seconds to ring 10 times.

    45 seconds is a long time when your waiting for someone to pick up .. but quite a short time when your in the shower with shampoo streaming down your face.

    *heh* not like thats a real life example.

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  73. Re:Doo-doo-doot gadgets also stump public librarie by vaxer · · Score: 2

    We snail mail 'em if we can't reach them by phone. It just takes a little while longer.

    No offense taken -- I'm not our vendor. :)

  74. Police?!! by Gruneun · · Score: 2

    Until we decide to actually give some police organization real authority to prosecute these people

    Around here, the Fraternal Order of Police is one of the worst organizations for telemarketing (second only to Citibank). They not only call, but repeatedly call until they get someone to solicit donations from.

  75. Make it un-profitable by the_machine · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I can understand it is a lousy job and I really sympathize with the people working it. However, I am not going to do the telemarketing company a favor by simply hanging up and shortening their call times.

    I pick up every "unavailable" call and as soon as I hear the other person call me by my last name and then mis-pronounce it, I say hello and let them start their speech, then I set the phone down. By doing this, I can increase the call times as much as possible and still get back to my TV show. Like spam, the only way that telemarketing will ever stop is when it is no longer profitable.

  76. InLine Plus also a scam by SethJohnson · · Score: 3, Informative


    Just an FYI:

    Inline Plus is an 'insurance policy' the phone company will always try to sell you (monthly fee of $3.95 or so). It's supposed to 'protect' you in case your wiring fails inside your house and needs to be repaired by the phone company. If you are a renter, then there's no risk of you bearing the expense of fixing telephone wiring, so there's NO NEED for inline plus. If you are a home-owner, it's highly unlikely that you'll encounter a (phone) wiring problem you can't fix yourself.

    When you sign up for phone service, the salesperson will inevitably automatically add this to the list of services regardless of if they ask you if you want it or not. When I realized what this was about after 10 months of paying for it, I called up customer service and told them to remove it from my account and that I had never authorized it. They refunded me my BACK CHARGES for inLine Plus. It was like $40 or so.
    1. Re:InLine Plus also a scam by mesocyclone · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sometimes this is useful!

      I live in a desert area that has lots of pack rats. These critters love to eat the phone wire insulation, and are quite adept at getting into my attic and walls and doing so.

      I have thus had the phone company out several times to repair the wiring. Having previously done it myself, and also having paid someone else to do so, in this case the insurance is worth it.

      I am trying to keep the rats out. If after some months my attick remains pack rat free, I will probably cancel the insurance.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    2. Re:InLine Plus also a scam by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Ah, interesting. I never caught that Bell was officially adding that service (scam?) automatically to new line installations.

      I got into a fight with SWBT recently because they added the DSL version of that service to my DSL circuit. The strange thing was, they didn't even add it right away. The charges just started appearing on my monthly bill several months after I had the line put in. They did end up taking it back off and crediting me for the previous month as well, but refused to explain how it got there in the first place.

    3. Re:InLine Plus also a scam by bartle · · Score: 2

      Inline Plus is an 'insurance policy' the phone company will always try to sell you (monthly fee of $3.95 or so). It's supposed to 'protect' you in case your wiring fails inside your house and needs to be repaired by the phone company. If you are a renter, then there's no risk of you bearing the expense of fixing telephone wiring, so there's NO NEED for inline plus. If you are a home-owner, it's highly unlikely that you'll encounter a (phone) wiring problem you can't fix yourself.

      I don't know if I'd call it a scam, it's more of a racket. I'm serviced by Qwest and their policy is that they charge $80 per visit if it turns out the problem was with your wiring and you're not paying that fee. What this means is that every time one has phone problems they're supposed to take a phone out to their D-Mark and check it there or risk the $80 fine.

      This is a pretty major thing to ask most people to do. Plus even if it's Qwest's fault, the technician may not find the problem and add the $80 charge anyway. So effectively they're charging you if they can't find the problem.

      I've had a good deal of fun with these rules personally. Despite various problems, including not actually having a D-Mark, I've managed to get by without paying that inline fee. But it's involved spending some time on the phone disputing charges and sitting out in the rain with a pair of alligator clips trying to find my line in a mess of wires. That's really too much to expect for most people.

    4. Re:InLine Plus also a scam by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


      I am not too sure what the distinction is between a racket and a scam. While I agree there may be some circumstances that would warrant this insurance policy, they only pertain to those people who own their own dwelling. If you're renting, there's no reason you should bear this expense. Does the phone company ever ask their customers if they own or rent? No. They just add the charge onto your bill. Lets do the math on the revenue:

      In a city of 1 million, let's assume 10% are renters. That's 100k people. If they all have phone service and are paying for this uneccessary 'service', that's like $400k a month the company is bilking from consumers.

      If there are any class-action lawyers out there, please file a suite against the phone companies over this!

      Seth

  77. Does Canada have this law? by phorm · · Score: 2

    Usually I ask if the US has laws like in Canada. This, however, sounds like a damn good law coming from America. Anyone know if anything like this applies in Canada.I'm tired of getting calls around dinner (they know I'm home then).

    And just in case it hasn't said it
    1. Place name on list
    2. Bust spam callers

    3. ??? (indeterminate court process?)
    4. Profit!

    Pre-recorded messages and audio-clips can also be a great amusement in this case - phorm

    1. Re:Does Canada have this law? by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      I remember last time this was on /. I looked around for a Canadian version, and there is one (national DNC list). I signed up online, and within a couple months, the number of calls trailed off noticibly. No idea where I found it, but google probably knows something. It did help.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  78. Connecticut DNC list is also effective by dcavanaugh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It reduced the calls by 99%. Aside from occasional mortgage refinance idiots and clueless SNET morons, the teletrash is pretty much gone. What little gets past the DNC list will be ignored since I only answer when Caller ID shows me a name or number that I recognize.

    Before the state offered the DNC list, I played around with a modem that just happened to include caller ID recognition. I wrote a quickie app to detect the "number unavailable" situation and have the modem go off-hook for 5 seconds and hang up. Any call that rang more than once was worth answering, because otherwise my program would have intercepted it. The sheer fun of hearing a single ring followed by silence made it all worthwhile. In a way, the state DNC list has deprived me of the enjoyment I used to get from my homemade teletrash defense system.

  79. Arkansas, too by juju2112 · · Score: 2

    Arkansas also has such a law. If you live in Arkansas, check out this site for details. I paid $5 to put my name on the list, and haven't had any telemarketing calls since.

  80. Really throw them off... by Gruneun · · Score: 2

    I pulled that kind of crap with a couple telemarketers. The last one had the unfortunate timing and got me hours after I had been laid-off.

    After trying to sell me on the benefits of his company's credit card, for which any question was easily solved by a flowchart, which was quite obviously sitting in front of him. Then I asked him what color the card was. I guarantee that this information is not on the flowchart. After a short silence, I explained that in my vast array of credit cards, I had covered most of the primary and secondary colors, along with several metallic cards. When he suggested that he believed it was a translucent card, I feigned enthusiasm and asked him to estimate the opacity. He, quite literally, spent 10 minutes trying to hunt down someone who could confirm this. Needless to say, he was disappointed to find out that I remebered a a building passkey was significantly translucent and I was no longer interested.

    These people generally do not have the ability to end the call (or initiate it, for that matter) and will stay on the line as long as the person doesn't hang up. Have some fun with it and then inform them that you want to be removed from their list.

  81. My (very) simple system by Bouncings · · Score: 2

    I only have voicemail. I have a cell phone, but when I call companies, I block my phone number. Very simple. T.M. never leave messages and I only give my cell phone number to friends -- never *EVER* to companies. Corporate America has abused the consumer phone system so I've simply denied them from calling me unless they want to leave a message. ;) It never even rings.

    --
    -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
  82. Doesn't seem very innovative to me by Xeger · · Score: 2

    Let's get this straight: they want me to buy a device that, when I press a button, will deliver a 10-second spiel and hang up. And for this miraculous device, they want me to pay between $10 and $60?

    For my money, I'd rather take 10 seconds to bitch out the telemarketer myself. It's therapeutic, and on occasion can even be amusing.

    I suppose the call screening devices linked to in the article are slightly more noteworthy, and might even be valuable to some people. Just the same, I've had a device for several years now that will play a prerecorded spiel and hang up on people unless they enter a code. It's called an answering machine.

    Of course, I would never use my answering machine in that way, since it would be extremely discourteous to ask all my friends and acquaintances to remember an extra three or four digits on top of my phone number, if they wanted to talk to me. With the proliferation of area codes, it's bad enough getting people to remember a 10-digit number; with an effective 14-digit phone number, I imagine I wouldn't be very popular at all!

  83. National Listing of Do-Not-Call Lists by sonny317 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the Direct Marketing Association's website:

    here

  84. "Do Not Call" list for Pennsylvania, etc... by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Pennsylvania recently passed an anti-telemarketing law that created a "Do Not Call" list. When they started accepting info (via phone and web) from people who wished to be added to that list, they got such a crushing, overwhelming response that their call center and their servers couldn't handle it, which made the local news and really drove the point home about exactly how many people HATE telemarketers.

    I am one of those people. I signed up successfully, early on the first day, but I still continue to do what I've been doing for years-- applying technology myself to keep the bastards from bugging me:

    For the last two years, I've had a Caller ID modem connected to the Mac that runs all my home automation stuff. I set it up with a whitelist of my friends and relatives. When someone on the whitelist calls, the computer verbally alerts me through wireless speakers placed thoughout the house, and I know to pick up the phone. The computer will also mute the sound on the entertainment center if I'm watching TV or have my stereo on, so I don't have to fumble for a remote. The end result is, the only people who can interrupt what I'm doing are people that I want to talk to. Everyone else gets the answering machine. This works for me because I am not so such a social butterfly that the whitelist needs constant updating. I suppose that if I were, though, I'd just create a web interface for it so I could edit it from anywhere.

    The bottom line, though, is that Caller ID is your friend. Don't pick up if you don't know who's on the other end, just let your machine get it. If the call is important enough, the caller will leave a message.

    ~Philly

  85. Always say "Do Not Call" List! by dochood · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whatever you do, NEVER tell a Telemarketer to put you on the DNC list!!! Always say "Do Not Call" list!

    Otherwise, in no time at all, the Democratic National Committee will be calling you, hitting you up for donations every night during supper!

  86. Great trick on the telemarketers by rhfrommn · · Score: 2, Funny

    A couple years back I heard a guy on the radio. He taped telemarketer calls for comic purposes. He always had them call back later so he could prepare. Anyways, one day he had a call from a pre-bought funeral/gravesite service. He said to call back tomorrow then recored it. It was totally hilarious, here is the transcript as best as I can remember. Telemarketer: Would you be interested in a pre-paid funeral service and gravesite to spare your family the burden . . . Guy: (Sniffing as if he just got done crying) You know, it is amazing that you called just now. You see, I got fired yesterday. My wife said she coulnd't take living with such a loser any more, so she took my kids and left me. I was just praying to god to give me a sign if I should kill myself or not, and then you called! TM: Ummmm, sir, can I get you some help or something. Guy: No, you have made my decision very clear for me. How can I pay for the funeral, do you take visa? TM: Uh, no, I can't do that right now. But I can have a salesman come visit you next week. Can I call somebody to help you or something. Guy: Nope, I'm fine. Hang on a second. (pause, then sound of gunshot then dude falling to ground) TM: SIIIRRRR!!! then scrambles to call the cops, ambulance, whatever.

    --
    My motto is: Never give up - unless it's harder than you want it to be.
  87. Privacy Director / Privacy Manager by Krelnik · · Score: 2
    Some of the Baby Bells have a product called "Privacy Director" (BellSouth) or "Privacy Manager" (SBC's companies including SW Bell, Ameritech, PacBell etc) that is great for this.

    Basically this is a very smart version of 'block anonymous calls'. Instead of just blocking all anonymous calls, it routes them to an intercept message where they can unblock their caller ID (if it is deliberately blocked) or identify themselves verbally. Only if they follow the procedure does the call go through, and you still get the opportunity to screen it when your phone rings.

    Here's the best part, which they don't really advertise. Since most telemarketers use automated phone dialing systems, most of the calls never make it past the intercept message! The automated dialer thinks it hit your answering machine and hangs up. So your phone never rings.

    I found that once I turned on Privacy Director on my home phone, the number of telemarketing calls I get has gone down like 90%. And I never had to hassle with anyone, register on a list, or anything. Plus it makes Caller ID all the more useful because you never see "Out of Area" or "Unavailable" anymore.

  88. Re: telezapper only works sometimes..... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Thanks for this informative post, but I beg to differ on how some telemarketing operations work.

    I actually did telemarketing for about a year for an area carpet cleaning company. (Talk about a job I'll never do again.)

    Anyway - they in fact *did* want to pay the employees to manually mark the calls as busy, answering machines, etc. We all had dumb terminals at our desks, and it worked like this:

    Dialer would call out from the phone number database, and as soon as it was finished dialing a number, would attempt to pass it to the first available telemarketer. (If everyone was on the line, it would apparently just abort the stray call; judging from the number of times people seemed irate as soon as we talked to them, acting like we'd been calling and hanging up on them previously.)

    When a call was passed to you, you'd immediately say "Hello", and glance at your dumb terminal screen, which was supposed to already be showing you the customer's name and address, etc. Assuming it displayed their last name, you'd immediately follow the "Hello" with a "Mr." or "Mrs." and the name shown, so it all appeared natural. (Sometimes the system got slow, so you had to change your opening pitch to something like "Hello! I'm calling with xxx carpet cleaners, to offer you specials, Mr. Doe.") If you heard a busy signal, a disconnected line, or an answering machine, you'd key in a letter code (such as "B" for busy) and it would close your line, clear your screen - and you'd wait for the next call.

    We also had a letter code we could key in if a customer told us not to ever call them again. It was supposed to mark the number for deletion from the dialing database. (I believe the numbers were actually deleted only overnight, when the manager started running a database clean-up and update type operation.)

    I don't remember the exact details on the other letter codes, but I believe they basically instructed the dialer to try the call again after preset numbers of minutes. (EG. Typing in a D for a disconnected line might tell it to call back again in 20 minutes, while a B for busy might tell it to try again in 10 minutes.)

  89. Re:The Ultimate Solution - NO by shepd · · Score: 2

    >I've talked to former telemarketers and they prefer my method. It waists no time.

    And that's the problem. If you _do_ waste the telemarketer's time, they get less commission, since they make fewer sales. The company gets less ROI on telemarketing, and the system breaks down because the telemarketers aren't getting paid enough to take the abuse, so they quit, and the company doesn't make the cash necessary to run the operation. No more telemarketing! (YAY! I got no phone spam!)

    Your best bet is to keep them on the phone for as long as possible (the old "Oh, I need to turn off the stove/check the kids, just a minute" trick is a good one). After that ask them all sorts of details about their product/company, maybe even saying you might be interested in a few dozen of the product for your company. And then, just before they are ready to give up, tell them to put you on their do not call list.

    The best I've done was 45 minutes (while I watched TV CC, of course!)... But that was an outgoing call to a spam with an 800 number in it. >:-D I usually average up to 10 minutes with the (luckily, very few, about 2 a month) telemarketers that call my place.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  90. Very neatly put by sbeitzel · · Score: 3, Informative

    The system you describe is something I'd like, too. Now, a quick Google search led me to look at Zeus Phonstuff over here. The price of this particular model is USD 249, but the device provides you a simple interface from caller ID box to PC (via serial cable). From there, doing the matching of the number against a database (perhaps even a shared database, much like spam blacklists) shouldn't be difficult. I just glanced through the online manual for this 2 line unit and it says that that unit doesn't do blocking (but this suggests that the 4 line unit does, since the switch is present, just not selectable).

    --
    Oh, go on, check out my job.
  91. A much easier idea: cellular only. by Gendou · · Score: 2

    All the devices, black boxes, and "do not call" lists in the article sound rather troublesome, because each telemarketer can still call you one time. It's easy enough to keep them from calling again, either by asking to be placed on their "do not call" list, or by having a device do the same thing, but there are still thousands of other comapnies out there.

    A much better solution is to either cancel your home phone service, or, if you're stuck with dialup Internet access, unplug all the telephones from your home phone line and use it ONLY for Internet access. Use your cellular phone(s) for all voice communication.

    It is completely illegal in the US for telemarketers to call a cellular phone. Not only can they be heavily fined if they do, but they're required by law to take proactive steps to make sure that they never actually do call a cellular phone. They have lists of cellular prefixes that they must check phone numbers against before calling them.

    Since switching to cellular-only nearly a year ago, I've received zero telemarking calls and only three wrong numbers, compared to several of each per week on my home phone line. Sure, my home phone line is probably still GETTING those calls, but since there are no telephones plugged into it and my computer is connected to the Internet 24 hours a day (my ISP is seriously regretting the whole "unlimited Internet" thing), the telemarketers will never get anything but a busy signal from me.

    As soon as cable Internet service becomes available in the area, I'll be cancelling my home phone line completely. Just a basic residential phone line costs more than a basic cellular plan these days once you add up all the taxes and fees the phone companies charge that the cellular companies don't, PLUS with cellular there are usually no long distance charges, and if you're a typical Slashdotter, you don't actually talk on the phone enough to risk using up all your airtime minutes and having to pay a per-minute rate.

    (This information applies to the United States, YMMV.)

  92. How do you keep track? by Gorimek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How do I know which outsorced telemarketing company is making each call?

  93. Surprise- not everyone obeys the law! by aquarian · · Score: 2

    We have do-not-call lists in the US, but they're hardly obeyed. Small companies just plead ignorance if they're caught, and large companies avoid the issue by using telemarketing "contractors." These operations spring up overnight, and disappear before they're caught. Some of them even operate from overseas, making them impossible to catch. Besides that, law enforcement has more important crimes to deal with than annoying phone calls.

  94. snakes are a good solution by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Funny



    Damn! That sounds rough. Get some snakes if you can and let them go up in your attic. If you put a heat lamp on a timer in there, they'll probably stay and will definitely reduce your packrat population.

    Since you're a homeowner, it might make sense in your case to keep the inline plus... In the case of apartment renters, though, it's wildly unnecessary.

    Good luck with the packrat situation!

    1. Re:snakes are a good solution by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      Well, there are lots of snakes in the neighborhood also. In fact, my dog stepped on a rattlesnake in the back yard last year. Fortunately neither noticed the other, so no damage done. But there is a basic ecological problem with this solution: there has to be a stable population of rats to maintain a stable population of snakes, and the only thing the rats can eat is my phone lines!

      BTW... do you know what it is like to live in a house with a recently dead snake in the walls? :-)

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    2. Re:snakes are a good solution by SethJohnson · · Score: 2



      Well, I suppose if there is a route for the rats to get in and out of your attic, there must also be a route for the snakes to get out when there is no more food. I don't imagine the smell of a dead snake in your walls is any worse than the smell of a dead rat.

      good luck,

      seth

    3. Re:snakes are a good solution by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      Yep. The problem is that I have snakes here, and they haven't solved the rats.

      Rat poison does, although the odor isn't too good for a few days afterwards, and the protectors of raptors in the neighborhood object to it because the rats might leave the house and become subject to predation.

      Oh well.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

  95. Keep Message Short ( was Re:It's simple ) by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 2
    I use this method all the time. I agree totally with this. The other thing to do is leave a very short greeting message. Mine is:

    "Hi this is 'Probably yo daddy'. Please leave a message."

    What happens is that telemarketers use a machine that dials. The machine dials a whole bunch of numbers. When someone picks up on the other end, the machine connects a telemarketer to your call. If you leave a short message, the message is over before the telemarketer is connected. The telemarketer doesn't hear anything and assumes the number is not in service and removes your number from their list.

    On top of this all, not answering your phone is great for increasing efficiency. Answer calls when your ready, not when they arrive. This gives you time to prepare info that is required to answer the call. Plus you can do it when you are compiling code or downloading pr0n^H^H^H^H large files.

    I use this technique for email too.

  96. Not jobs, exploitation... by aquarian · · Score: 2

    There are telemarketing jobs that are "real," like selling long distance service to corportations, being a stockbroker, insurance agent, etc. But these "real" jobs, like any other, require some skills, training, smarts, and maybe even a college degree. Good companies with good products need good people on their front lines.

    The telemarketing jobs available to people without these skills are usually not "real" jobs at all. They're miserable, boiler-room slavery for fly-by-night sleazeball telemarketing contractors. Employees are lured into servitude with promises of big commissions, flexible hours, etc. The reality is being forced to work long hours to meet unrealistic quotas, for commissions that never materialize. After a couple of weeks of this (according to Dept. of Labor statistics), most people get disgusted and leave. But the contractor got plenty of work out of them almost for free, and there's always another sucker to replace the one who left. Most people leave these jobs in worse shape than when they started, even more broke, deeper in debt, completely demoralized, and without any new skills. In the time spent working for the telemarketing contractor, they would have been far better off washing dishes, cleaning toilets, or pounding nails.

    The government would be doing *everyone* a favor by putting these bottom-feeders out of business.

  97. Translation by shrikel · · Score: 2
    Slight pause, then in a surprised tone: "You don't?"

    Translation:

    [press "no" button to get to next page on the script tree], then in a surprised tone: "You don't?"

    They have the entire conversation scripted. Any objection they think you might have has been considered beforehand and planned for. The only way to REALLY screw them up is by getting out of their script tree.

    Case in point:

    My dad: Hello?
    TM: Sir, my name is Foo, and I have a great prize for you today if you can answer one simple question.
    Dad: Uh, okay.
    TM: Who was the US president during the Civil War?
    Dad: I think it was Truman.
    TM: Well, this is a tough question, so I'll give you one more hint. It was either Ronald Reagan or Abraham Lincoln. (emphasis in original) Which do you think?
    Dad: I still think it was Truman.
    TM: ... Uh, ... sorry. [click]

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
  98. Re:Doo-doo-doot gadgets also stump public librarie by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2

    Perhaps your library should start asking for email addresses for those patrons that wish to use them. Then send your notices via email and via telephone. One is bound to make it.

    I work for a group of public libraries that uses a computer to call and say "Someone at this telephone number" -- we won't say who, because if you use a public library we consider it your own damn business -- "has an item waiting to be picked up at the So-and-So Public Library".

    What does the little "someone at this number" dance actually accomplish? If it's a one person household then the person recieving the message already knows who they are. If there are two people in the house then it's obviously either for you or for the other person. If there's a whole family, then you probably have to know who's waiting for a book anyway in order to relay the message to the right person.

    And, most annoying of all, if more than one person in the household uses the library (gasp!) then you're just confusing everyone by being all coy and not saying who the darn message is for.

  99. Easy solution by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just invite them for a swim with their new gift from you: the Sodium Swimming Suit.

  100. Fun with Telemarketers by gnovos · · Score: 2

    Now, if you are evil and cruel, like me for instance, getting a telemarketer is not something you dread; it's something to look forward to!

    "Hold on, I have to turn off the stove," 3 minutes. Nice as can be, "Ok, I'm back, now what were you telling me?" 20 seconds. "Oops, now one of the kids is trying to hurt himself," there goes another five minutes, "Wait, the doorbell", 4 minutes. "No, I really do want to hear your pitch, it sounds great! I'm almost sold" "Oh, I'm sorry, I didn't hear that last couple of minutes that you were talking becuase I ran off to the bathroom, could you repeat it" 7 minutes....

    My record is 34 minutes.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  101. Ways to end and prevent telemarketing calls. by ksemlerK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work for a telemarketing company, and every day I call about 600 people per day. There is approximatly 100 people working in the same call center as me. Just going off of the volume of calls per day that I make, there are at least 60000 calls going out over the course of 16 hours. 10% of these calls end in sales, while 10% of the sales will end in an upsale als0. But this is beside the point.

    Here are some ways that people try and avoid telemarketing calls, and the results of what happens:

    1-one who is called states that they are not available (some are quite stupid also, "Im not here" is a common resopnce)

    Result-we disposition as not available. Re-calls house in 2-3 hours.

    2-one who is called says they are busy.

    Result-dispositioned as not available. Recall house in 2-3 hours

    3-one who is called cannot speak english, or not well.

    Result-dispositioned as a lnguage problem. House recalled (maybe in 5 months) waiting for them to learn english

    4-one who is called says they are not interested.

    Result-give second effort, if refused, disposition as refusal. one who is called rmoved from that program's list. Continues to remain on other lists.

    5-one who is called hangs up without stated reason.

    Result-dispositioned as hung up, recalls house in 20 miniutes.

    6-one who is called brings up threats of lawsuit / or is an irate customer.

    Result- dispositioned as refusal. See results above.

    7-one who is called requests to be placed on do not call list.

    Result-Give DNC responce. Dispositioned as DNC. Federal law mandates that the called number be placed on company DNC list within 90 days.

    8-disconnected tone.

    Result- dispositioned as disconnect. Number is dropped from list.

    9-number is fax machine.

    Result- dispositioned as disconnect. Number dropped

    10-awnserwing machine.

    Result-dispositioned as awnsering machine, called back in 2-3 hours

    11-one who is called is deaf/has difficult hearing on the fone.

    Result- dispositiond as deaf, number dropped

    12- Anonomys call blockage/privacy manager/phone butler.

    Result- put a random sequence of numbers into the telephone box at the cublcle, to "fool" the caller ID system, and continue call.

    General guidelines that work:

    1. Request to be placed on DNC list (and say you have requested so before. Since it is a previous requset, we will red flag it, and it will have more importance being removed even faster.

    2. Speak a forign language, and dont speak any english. You dont even have to know any of the language that you are speaking, but caller will not know that. Will be language barrier. (Maybe recalled in 5 months).

    3. Give your credit card creditors a invalid number, a fax machine, or a modems number. You wont be getting the call, and number will be removed.

    4. Refuse the offer. Will give second effort, maybe third also, but if you hold your ground, will be dispositioned as refusal. Removed from that call list, remain on others.

    I hope this pointer list helps you stop those endless calls

  102. Re: telezapper only works sometimes..... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    I use that method here, too. But generally, I find it's not extremely effective - because the auto-dialers you hang up on like that just try back again and again, at least 3 or 4 more times, until they detect you've actually picked up and talked to them.

  103. Telemarketer Blocking Law in CA as of 2003 by gdyas · · Score: 2

    Many states are enacting laws such as that which goes into effect in California as of January 2003.

    The law mandates that the state maintain a website where people may, for a minor fee of $3 to maintain the database, assign their name and number to a state "Do Not Call" list. Anyone doing telemarketing toward anyone in CA must then refer to this list or risk a $500 fine for each breach of the law.

    The effect is that once I pony up $3 my number is protected for 3 years, and I can get $500 from each telemarketing company that breaks the law by calling me though I'm on the state no-call list by suing them in enforcement of the law.

    --

    The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

  104. Re:My solution - be nice... doesn't work. by gosand · · Score: 2
    I can tell you, as a former telemarketer (many years ago and I needed money :-)), that they NEVER give their real names. Each person has a script with a fake name written on top that they are supposed to use whenever someone asks them their name. This is just an older version of fake headers.

    So I'll add to my list of questions: Is that your real name or the one you are supposed to give me if I ask? :-)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  105. ok. Technology is not the answer here. by Erpo · · Score: 2

    Neither is saying, "Please put me on your do not call list." While they're both effective, the only way to drive annoying commercial marketing into the ground is to make it more expensive than it is profitable.

    1. Phone marketing: Feign interest, then ask the telemarketer to please hold for a minute (someone's at the door, etc...). By yourself, you can cut into their profit margin a little and have the satisfaction of getting back at the people that are bothering you so much. If enough people did this, it would be DEVASTATING to the telemarketing industry. Why? When a telemarketer is on the phone with you, their machine stops dialing new numbers. This seems like a smart idea - there's no reason to call someone if the telemarketer is busy talking to someone else. Usually, those machines dial 10 numbers at the same time and the telemarketer clicks over to the one that gets a live person. That's where those hangup calls come from: out of the 10 numbers the machine dialed at once, yours was one of the two that yielded a live person, and the telemarketer decided to go with the other one. What does this tell us about the telemarketing industry? They just hate it when their telemarketers are sitting around waiting to make a sale (i.e. while the machine is dialing). If they're waiting for you to get the door, guess what? They're sitting around waiting to make a sale.

    2. Junk mail: This is really easy. I have no idea why nobody has started advocating this so far. Whenever you get junk mail, open it up, find the "postage paid - business reply mail" envelope, stuff everything else into it, seal it, and put it back in the mailbox. You're charging them postage to throw away their garbage. If you want to remain completely anonymous, just tear out the parts that have your name and address and mail the rest back.

    3. Spam: Ok coders, this one is for you. Implement selective whitelisting as described here in your favorite open-source SMTP server. Yeah, server-side. Just make it a flag that can be turned on for individual email accounts so that the server will automatically start building a whitelist from confirmation emails. As long as this remains a *nix-only client-side spam-blocker it will never see widespread use. Why? Well, a server-side implementation has many benefits:

    * It only has to be installed once. Every time a piece of software is installed on a computer, it's an opportunity for something to go wrong. A client-side program could install itself incorrectly, the user could become frustrated with an interface shortcoming, or it could trash some part of the user's system (possibly turning them off to spam blocking tech forever). If it's installed (carefully and by the ISP's lead tech) on a single mail server, suddenly thousands of people have the ability to block spam with no more effort than a call to the ISP to turn on the feature.

    * ISPs would provide it as a competitive service to their customers. Most ISPs (in my limited experience) use open-source *nix mail servers, so implementation in existing systems would be easy. Perfect spam-filtering (that guarantees no false positives - meaning no lost important mail) would definitely influence a consumer's ISP choice now that most are competing based on cost. Considering how easy it would be to implement, it's a no-brainer for another ISP to offer the same service once the ISP across the street does.

    * The principles are easy enough to explain to most people. Granted, most ISPs don't explain the details of their spam-blocking tech to new customers, but when they make a claim like, "No false positives, guaranteed!" it will be easy to explain if a customer gets curious.

    Eventually, when no spam gets through, or just not enough to pay the bandwidth bills, spam will stop. What if selective whitelisting doesn't work? Well, it does, go read the web site. ;) The worst case scenario would be that spammers would have to buy three times the bandwidth to send the amount of spam they do now, as well as maintain a working and valid From: address.

    4. Banners: Go download privoxy right now. Combined with mozilla's popup blocking feature, I've seen maybe 3 ads in the past 3 months, and I spend hours surfing the web every day. It's absolutely amazing. Same deal with selective whitelisting as above, too. If ISPs ran privoxy, they'd be able to offer a service to their customers that, well, once addicted they couldn't live without. It's also the perfect way to implement caching and cut down on ISP backbone bandwidth costs.

    Think these are good ideas? Help me spread them around. Think they suck? Tell me why so I can improve my explanation.

  106. I thought cell phone telemarketing was illegal! by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2
    Exerpt from the FCC website, describing TCPA


    Autodialers produce, store and dial telephone numbers using a random or sequential number generator. Autodialers are usually used to place artificial (computerized) or prerecorded voice calls. Except for emergency calls or calls made with the prior express consent of the person being called, autodialers and any artificial or prerecorded voice messages may not be used to contact numbers assigned to:

    • any emergency telephone line;
    • the telephone line of any guest or patient room at a hospital, health care facility, home for the elderly, or similar establishment;
    • a paging service, cellular telephone service, or other radio common carrier service, if the person being called would be charged for the call; or
    • any other service for which the person being called would be charged for the call.

    1. Re:I thought cell phone telemarketing was illegal! by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

      You could say the same thing about any law that limits telemarketing. Does that mean we should give up on legislative relief?

      The state DNC lists seem to be the most effective solution thus far, so I guess the best option we have (in DNC states) is to be sure that your cell phone is also on the DNC list.

  107. Re:One way to avoid it all is to... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
    "Where I am (Ont., Canada) it's $5/month to be unlisted, and another $3-5/month to be unpublished."

    I am in Ontario and we get it for free. It turns out that someone with the same last name as my family in the same city was an illicit drug trafficker and we kept getting calls in the middle of the night asking for the guy.

    We had the police kindly delist us and it has remained in effect for no charge to us, even though the guy was arrested and hauled off to jail many years ago.

  108. 1900please call me and solicit your product by diesel_jackass · · Score: 2

    i wonder if i could get a 900 (976, whatever) number and charge a butload of money every time some a-hole wants to sell me a magazine.

  109. Re: telezapper only works sometimes..... by sehryan · · Score: 2

    Sounds like they had a pretty rough dialer then. On some of our larger (50k numbers) campaigns, agent-marked busies and answering machines was in the area of 1 - 5% of dialer-marked busies and machines. And this was with no more than 5s agent idle time and less than 10% drops.

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
  110. Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 by DiveX · · Score: 2

    There has been a FEDERAL law in effect for more than a decade. Try doing a google search for at least 30 seconds before making statements like this.

    It outlaws several things, including all unsolicited commercial faxs, prerecorded commercial calls to residences, and an calls to devices where someone must pay for the call (e.g. cell phone, pager).

    That same law, and subsequent memorandums by the FCC, state that companies MUST maintain a DNC and it must be honored for 10 years. Companies that solicited by phone must also provide their name, address, and phone number. It does not have to be asked for as they are required to give this (most ignore it though).

    The law is screwy in that a telemarketer must call you at least twice in a 12 month period, after being placed on the list, before a violation occurs. Upon request, a company must also provide to you a written copy of their company's policy regarding the maintenance of their DNC list. Failure to do this is a violation of the law. This is a Federal Law that also provides a private right of action and allows you to sue the company is small claims court (or the appropiate court of your state) for damages.

    In the past month, I have obtained $800 from two separate company (both mortgage companies) for prerecorded solicitations to my home. This was without going to court and simply sending them a demand letter stating my claim and backing it up with statute proof. One was local and the other was in Virginia.

    On Tuesday, I won (though through default since defendant failed to show) a $1500 judgement against a company the prerecord called me in May. Today I filed a $1500 suit against a local company that sent an unsolicited fax. I sent them a certified demand letter that was returned to me yesterday as refused. So by noon today I filed suit. I've probably spent 20+ hours of research, but I have solid proof to support everything I claim as well as the case history to back it up. I will be filing against another prerecord once the time allowed by my demand letter to send me my money has expired.

    You have $500 in statutory damages owed to you for every violation. If you can show that the defendant 'knowingly of willing' violated the law, then you may be awarded triple damages (for a total of $1500 for each violation for you math majors). If a company uses a prerecord, fails to provide the name of the entity, and ever refuses to provide their company's DNC policy (or more likely does not have one) then just in statutory damages you are owed $1500 for the 3 violations. Imaging the look on their face if the judge awards you treble damages!

    Do research. It will be worth your time if you push this and win. After the first case and subsequent research involved, future cases will just be copy and paste demand letters and lawsuits.

    Here is some stuff to help you with your research.

    Use google to find information.

    Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
    47 USC 227 (actual law)
    47 CFR 227 (code of federal regulations: FCC's implementation of the TCPA)

    International Science v Inacom Communications 106 F3d 1146 (holds that state courts have exclusive jurisdiction of private right of action claims)

    Kaplan v Democrat and Chronicle 698 N.Y.S.2d 799 ((shows actual damages do not have to be shown [i.e. prevent defendant from saying they would own you no more than 5o cents for a junk fax])

    Nicholson v Hooters of Augusta 136 F.3d 1287 (holds state courts have jurisdiction for private right of action)

    Foxhall v Telecommunications Premium Services 156 F.3d 432 (same as above case)

    There are several others that support same thing. Search for these cites; 156 F.3d 513, 131 F.3d 507

    Kaplan v First City Mortgage 701 N.Y.S.2d 859 (shows that 'express' consent is NOT given by merely having your number in a directory. Faxers and prerecorded callers MUST have prior EXPRESS permission or an existing business relationship in order to contact you in those ways)

    47 USC 312 (f) (defines what 'willfull' means - basically that it is the conscious and deliberate commission of an act, irrespective of intent to violate any provision of the regulations. If they meant to fax you (e.g not a transposition of two numbers error), then they are guilty of the violation whether or not they knew it was against the law.

    Moser v FCC 46 F.3d 970 (holds that prerecords are not constitutionally protected speech).

    Destination Ventures v FCC 844 F. Supp 632 (holds that the TCPA is constitutionally valid)

    States may have thie own law, however they are not preemptive unless they are MORE restrictive than the federal law. If the TCPA requires telemarketers to maintain a list for 10 years and the state law requires something more restrictive, like 15 years, then the state would preempt.

    I've put a lot of research into this. I'm not in this for the money as I would rather have this practice ended. I've taken steps like writing the DMA (the RIAA of the marketing world) to be placed on their list as well as my own state's DNC list, so this certainly isn't an attempt to rake in the money.

    --
    Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
  111. Keep a log. by DiveX · · Score: 2

    When you demand to be placed on the DNC, make sure to tell them that this includes the telemarketing company placing the call (get their company name) as well as the company for whom thay are making the call. If they ever say it will take X number of days to be removed, do not belive them. If they call again an hour later, it is a violation. The law does not provide a grace period. I have a hournel that I keep near the phone as well a recorder already connected to the phone to record the prerecords if necessary.

    --
    Cave, wreck, and deep diver.
  112. Telemarketing anti-telemarketing technology? by richie2000 · · Score: 2
    So, you get a call while eating dinner:

    -Hello. *chew, chew*
    -Hello Sir! Am I interrupting something?
    -Yeah, we're eating.
    -Perfect! Would you say this is annoyting, me calling you in your home like this?
    -Definitely.
    -And how would you like to be free of this annoyance once and forever?
    -Get lost.
    -Precisely! I am in a position to offer you a grrrreat deal on a new invention that can filter out these pesky calls - this could be the last time you ever spoke to an obnoxious telemarketer!
    -I dunno...
    -Did you know we have special training facilities where we learn to sound cheerful, cipper and positive, no matter what? We train day in and day out to persuade you, the hard-working American Joe to part with your hard-earned money, and we're damned good at it, if I may say so myself. We never give up! We call in rain, sleet or snow! If Ma Bell (ultra-cheap long-distance rates!) is napping and a tropical storm has taken the phones down, why we're not above visiting in person with our encyclopedias, aluminum sidings, low-low APR and zero-down offers!
    -OK. *sigh* Where do I sign?

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free