Slashdot Mirror


Free Books: Under the Radar

bcrowell writes "Remember e-books, anti-books, and print-on-demand books? They didn't pan out. The surprise success story is free books." Of course, this defines "success" as number of readers, not in terms of monetary profits. E-books and their ilk were concentrating on the latter definition, rather than the former. Still, it's good to see free books preferred in some circles based on their merit, and not just the cost.

270 comments

  1. business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. free books
    2. ?
    3. PROFIT!!!

    1. Re:business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1. Go to Slashdot and post incredibly overused joke, slightly modified to fit the posted story.
      2. Retarded moderators mod up comment as funny.
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

    2. Re:business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Whine
      2. ?
      3. Profit!

    3. Re:business model by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Actually this modle does have a basis... although, it's more like this... (in the case of Baen)

      1- Free books
      1a- Make sure free books are either old, or the first books in a series, to set a hook in people, to want to read more
      2- allow word of mouth to get people interested.
      3- interested people buy dead tree books to get the rest of the series
      4-profit

    4. Re:business model by Redline · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Joke if you want, but I can fill in 2 for you:
      1. free books
      2. free books act as gateway drug for non-free ebooks.
      3. PROFIT!!!

      It happened to me. When paperbacks started costing > 9 dollars, I stopped buying them. It hurt to decrease my favorite entertainment, but with my scifi/fantasy appetite of 2-4 paperbacks a weekend, I just couldn't afford it.

      Then I heard fictionwise was giving away hugo and nebula award nominees. How could I resist? I downloaded them all. After spending a happy hour tweaking Weasel Reader, I settled in with my Palm to devour some words.

      I was like the recovered junky, who, having one hit, falls deep into addiction again. But I still wasn't going to pay 9 bucks for a paperback, or worse, the same amount for an ebook. I trolled Project Gutenberg, Baen, OReilly look for a good read. That held off the monkey on my back for a little while. Still I needed more. So I went back to fictionwise, credit card in hand, looking for my fix. I discovered that unlike some ebookstores (cough,cough Peanut Press) not all ebooks were overpriced, DRM'd e-versions of last years NYT bestseller list. fictionwise has TONS of great novels cheap. Real cheap. In text format. Did I mention cheap? And even better: novellas, short stories, serials, all manner of quickie escapism that fit perfectly into the time it takes to ride the bus, or watch your clothes dry.

      So now I'm hooked on cheapie short stories from fictionwise. On Friday nights I used to go down to the Blockbuster and rent 9 dollars worth of DVDs for my weekend entertainment. Now I spend a fun hour browsing an ebookstore, and for 4 dollars (0.30 - 1.50 each) I download a half-dozen good stories to fill my free time.

    5. Re:business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Beat dead horse.
      2. ?
      3. Profit!

    6. Re:business model by Servants · · Score: 4, Funny

      When paperbacks started costing > 9 dollars, I stopped buying them. It hurt to decrease my favorite entertainment, but with my scifi/fantasy appetite of 2-4 paperbacks a weekend, I just couldn't afford it.

      Dude... haven't you got a library? The original source of free books...

    7. Re:business model by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      When paperbacks started costing > 9 dollars, I stopped buying them. It hurt to decrease my favorite entertainment, but with my scifi/fantasy appetite of 2-4 paperbacks a weekend, I just couldn't afford it.

      Dude... haven't you got a library? The original source of free books...

      If you've already replaced Blockbuster with Netflix, what are the odds you'll want to locate and trudge down to the nearest library when you can get your reading fix online? (Especially with some of the types of people who hang around libraries...at least Blockbuster didn't have that problem.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some of the types of people that hang around a library?

      those scary student.aHHHH!!!
      run hes got a card index

    9. Re:business model by Redline · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Dude... haven't you got a library? The original source of free books...

      Of course, but I can't be the only slashgeek who knows the length and bredth of the scifi (and horror, and mystery) sections of his local library like the back of his hand. And I can't be the only one to have his librarian say, "You know, for the amount of late fees you have paid for those overdue Cherryh novels over the years, you could have bought your own collection of hardbacks."

      And I have a local coffee house too, if I want to hear smartasses expouse uninformed opinions. But I still pay for my slashdot membership. Some things are just convenient to get online. :)

    10. Re:business model by Rande · · Score: 1

      Dude, my library has about ->||||||- that many books in the sci-fantasy section. Of which there are none that I want to read. I personally own more books in my house than the entire fiction section.
      I enjoy rereading good books, so my book habit doesn't cost more than $150 a quarter these days.

    11. Re:business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least you're reading.

    12. Re:business model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steal an election? You mean the election that one NJ Republican originally stole from another NJ Republican?
      Here is the same concept of stolen applied to the NJ Republican candidate.

      Talking Points Memo

  2. In the beginning... by intermodal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the Beginning was the Command Line by Neal Stephenson. If you haven't already read it, it's basicaly a history of operating systems and why they are how they are, intertwined with metaphors on how what parts work and a breakdown of OS/GUI variations and such. His stuff is way better than my explanation. It's free...so download it instead of listen to me ramble. If you hate it, the most you've lost is the time you took to DL and read what told you that. Also available in print.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    1. Re:In the beginning... by Bonker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      'Command Line' is one of the finest explanations of the rationale behind GUI-interfaces you can read. It does an excellent job of explaning the differences between Linux, Windows, and Mac interfaces from a usability point of view rather than from a social or financial stance. This is good readin' folks.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:In the beginning... by intermodal · · Score: 5, Informative

      Also, if you read nothing else of command line, you at least to fully understand the OS marketplace, must read the car dealer chapter. No other explanation has ever come closer to home than this to perfectly illustrating the operating system market and the relation of the respective systems.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:In the beginning... by SquadBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      I *really* liked the bit about drills.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    4. Re:In the beginning... by intermodal · · Score: 1

      yes...the Hole Hawg was indeed another good part. Hell, I loved the whole thing, to be honest...read it in one sitting, myself. couldn't put it down (who can say that about most history/computer books?)

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    5. Re:In the beginning... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Interesting read, but I disagree with a great number of his points. One basic problem is that he thinks a cool operating system is an end in itself, or absolute control of a program is the dominant goal. That may be for some folks, but most people just want to get work done. He then complains that people don't see the obvious, and make the same choices that he made. Folks have different goals, and it's him who can't see other's goals. Still interesting, was worth reading.

      Hmm, so God has a command line. I wonder if he asked Mel to write it in Fortran.

    6. Re:In the beginning... by cebarro · · Score: 1

      Gave this to my wife and a friend. It seems to have anwered quite a few repeatedly asked questions...

    7. Re:In the beginning... by boa13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Interesting read, (blah blah blah)

      Did you actually read it, or did you just skim through? It seems as if you read the beginning and the ending, missing everything in between.

      What you say he wrote is false. He doesn't think a cool operating system is an end in itself, nor does he say that absolute control of a program is the dominent goal. You imply that he failed to see that most people just want to get the work done, whereas it is his whole point all along. You portray him as someone who has made one definitive choice, which is wrong - at the time of writing, it seems he was using Linux, Windows NT and BeOS, having abandoned Macs a few years before.

      Folks have different goals, and contrary to what you say, he sees that very well. I now wonder what your goal is? Are you genuinely mislead by a quick skim, or are you a most subtle troller? The only valid point you make, and which I repeat here is was worth reading. Very true.

    8. Re:In the beginning... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      " the most you've lost is the time"
      or
      the most you lost is something you can never get back, ever.

      I see what your saying, and I'll check it out, but it really annnoys me when the most valuable thing we have, time, is put behing money.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:In the beginning... by intermodal · · Score: 1

      you make a good point, but time is cheaper than it costing both time and money. And time spent trying new things is often time well spent, even if it only gives you a more educated reason not to like something. For example, I seem to recall Thomas Edison being asked if he felt like a failure when his 10,000th attempt at making a light bulb had failed, he merely responded, "not at all! I've merely discovered 10,000 ways that do not work."

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  3. And this is exactly why I support DRM... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    Chances are the greatest benefactor will be free (but limited) music.

    1. Re:And this is exactly why I support DRM... by intermodal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But as you can see, this can be clearly done without DRM as well. Plus this doesn't benefit the (dare i say it) Cartels that force crappy overpriced music on dumb masses like DRM would...Idealism is nice, but it doesn't work if its easily exploited by those who are already in power.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    2. Re:And this is exactly why I support DRM... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Huh?

    3. Re:And this is exactly why I support DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Huh?", the intelligent response given by a supporter of DRM. lol.

    4. Re:And this is exactly why I support DRM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Plus this doesn't benefit the (dare i say it) Cartels that force crappy overpriced music on dumb masses like DRM would...Idealism is nice, but it doesn't work if its easily exploited by those who are already in power.


      That reminds me of a scary encounter over the weekend. Here I was sitting watching an NFL approved copyrighted telecast of my local football team's game when I hear this knock at the door. Naturally being the lazy ass I am I yell for my wife to go answer it but I forget she's not at home. So about a minute later I hear "RIAA WITH A WARRANT! RIAA WITH A WARRANT!" and these fucking guys in black jumpsuits break down my front door! They pull me off the couch and shove me into the floor with an MP5 aimed at the back of my head and start shuffling through my CD collection.

      RIAA Goon: "I notice here you don't have the latest CD from Christina Aguilera or the new Eminem single."
      Me: "Uhh, no. I don't listen to that shit."

      So what does he do? Fucking pistol whips me in the head for being a smartass!

      RIAA Goon: "Check his computer!"
      Other RIAA Goon comes back: "It's clean. Just some fucking Lunix iso images."
      RIAA Goon: "You're luck punk. For now. Here, take this Eminem single. I'll take the $20 out of your wallet and we'll be on our way. Next time have some modern pop music or it could be ugly."

  4. Stephen Hawking by D4Vr4nt · · Score: 1, Funny

    A Brief History of Time might have to be revised yet again..

    No free books. :P

    --
    R4NT.com - A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.
  5. Free/E Not the problem by RobPiano · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know lots of people who read both free and e-books.. but that's not why I haven't taken it on, and why I believe the market hasn't taken off either. Reading a book on the computer screen is the pits. Lots of technology has been promised to fix this, but where are the commercial products?

    I glad to see free books are doing well, but I'm not going to read one.

    Rob(ert) #3

    1. Re:Free/E Not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heck I've offered a free weekly photo magazine from Paris and have no takers. It's visual so there's no reading and what the heck.

    2. Re:Free/E Not the problem by nanojath · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Counterexample: Flyboy Action Figure COmes With Gasmask (or something like that) by punk self-publisher Jim Munroe, available last time I looked for free download at his website, nomediakings.org. It's outta print in it's paper form (originally published by Harper Collins) and he's not ready to re-release it so he makes it freely available as download. I got it, immediately printed it on regular letter size paper, "bound" it with a binder clip and read it just like that. Easy.


      On the other hand I agree with you. Computers are a great way to make text AVAILABLE but a rotten way to display it for reading. For resolution and ease on the eyes print still rules.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    3. Re:Free/E Not the problem by jmv · · Score: 3, Informative

      Many free (as in speech) books are available on dead tree (for a fee), the same way you can get the latest Linux distro without downloading.

    4. Re:Free/E Not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is really the point of the article. Restricted license e-books don't let you go down to the printer's and make a dead tree copy; free books do.

    5. Re:Free/E Not the problem by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember an IBM screen with 300DPI. 300DPI is a sorta maghic number, resolution enough to make it easy to read stuff on screen. Problem it costs an arm and a leg and your house (at least back then). I wonder how far down the manufacturing costs have fallen, though probably no where near 'makes sense for an ebook reader".

    6. Re:Free/E Not the problem by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean free as in beer?

    7. Re:Free/E Not the problem by f97tosc · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Reading a book on the computer screen is the pits.

      That's the issue, isn't it. But what will happen the day when there are screen that are as comfortable to read from as books? Clearly this is only a matter of time. Maybe not soon, but it is bound to happen.

      Then what?

      Especially in education there will probably be a substantial increase in free literature. Especially in basic subjects there will be excellent free alternatives available.

      For mainstream books the issue is more thorny. Naively you would think that publishing houses will loose all their power, and that authors started letting peope download their stuff at rates much, much lower than what would be paid for the book in a store. For some reason though, this did not happen to music. I wonder if publishing houses are as powerful and united as RIAA...

      Tor

    8. Re:Free/E Not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lose not loose guy where are you? this person spelled "lose" "loose"

    9. Re:Free/E Not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i donno, i think i'd rather just take the real book along. it doesn't run out of batteries, the sun doesn't interfere with visibility on the screen. And when you go camping, you're not that loser who can't part with his computer for 3 days.I can mark pages in the book, using a REAL bookmark. I don't want/need ebooks.

    10. Re:Free/E Not the problem by puppet10 · · Score: 2

      This is a viewsonic based on that tech I believe -
      VP2290b

      Although its 'only' about 200 pixels per inch.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    11. Re:Free/E Not the problem by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Stuff is easy enough to read on screen, there's no need for magical bazillion DPI monitor...

      What we DO need is a book-sized, CHEAP (PDA's ain't cheap, and they are too small. I'm talking about gizmo priced at maybe /$20, it doesn't have to do anything except display text, though.), light, and preferably has good battery lifespan...

      How goes the e-Paper research? No /. stories lately.

    12. Re:Free/E Not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Reading a book on the computer screen is the pits.

      I beg to differ. Reading from a PC is easier for me. All I need to do is increase thhe text font size to a comfortable level, then scroll away with the mouse wheel.

      I've tried to read Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov on my monitor, and what eventually stopped me wasn't the ease of reading, but the content of the story. I got through more than 40 chapters, actually.

      Those LCD monitors are sure to help, too, once I get one. Future improvements in text-to-speech software would make it even better, esp. for, but limited to, the blind.

    13. Re:Free/E Not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i find that a computer screen is a lot easier to read from for long periods of time when you have a dark background with light text. everything i do at work is set up that way.

    14. Re:Free/E Not the problem by Obasan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To me, the natural progression for a publisher in an arena where selling dead-tree print has ended is in picking the diamonds from the rough as it were. There are almost as many would-be writers as readers out there, and most of them are awful. Lots of books that get published are awful, and a lot more meritless manuscripts are thrown out every year (along with some good manuscripts that never get published).

      Still, there remains the task of:
      1) Identifying good writing.
      2) Promoting the authors who produce good work.
      3) Promoting specific titles from authors who produce good work.
      4) Editing! Even good authors spend a lot of time going back and forth with their editors.
      5) Story art etc.

      So there is always going to be work for the publishing houses. What remains to be seen is how digital distribution will be managed without bankrupting the existing companies. And if they are bankrupted, what will evolve to fill these roles?

      Its possible someone will develop a site like epinions or slashdot except for writing, with a moderation / meta moderation system and so on. But I think the same issues that take place on slashdot will evolve - most 'moderators' will spend most of their time only reading stories/books that have already been modded up and there will be a huge collection of mostly unsorted stories/books. Most of which will be garbage but in which plenty of gems will be overlooked.

    15. Re:Free/E Not the problem by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      300DPI is a magic number for another reason, other than readability, it's the resolution that almost all print-ready images are at (as in ready for a printing press, not your inkjet). Therefore you can work with printable stuff at true size and display 100% of the data without scaling.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    16. Re:Free/E Not the problem by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      and they are too small.

      For me, the small size of my pda is one of the best points for reading ebooks. I couldn't fit a novel in my pocket, but I can carry a bookshelf full of text around in my ipaq. It took a little time getting used to the screen, but at this point I'd much rather read off it than paper.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    17. Re:Free/E Not the problem by msheppard · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The technology to fix this exists. The Palm V and Palm Vx are ideal eBook reading platforms. Reading on the palm kicks paper's ass, to be quite honost.

      Some key features of reading on the palm:
      1. Easy to always have with you. Palm fits in your pocket, paper back will not. Knock off a chapter in line at wall-mart.
      2. Back-light: Read in the dark without keeping anyone else up.
      3. Bookmark/Annotate: Look stuff up later, never loose your place.
      4. Very easy to hold in one hand and turn pages. Try that with a paperback.
      5. Download now means at 4am if I finish a book, I can download another one right away.
      6. Easy to share.
      7. Search.

      I am very much sick of hearing people knock reading on the palm (or eBooks in general) becuase "The Paper Book is the perfect interface." I have to reply with a resounding, "NOT!" I read a lot, every day. And since starting to read on the Palm, I always prefer it to paper.

      Please do *NOT* assume when someone says they are reading an eBook that they are sitting in front of a 21inch monitor in an office building. Picture me, in a lean-to on the side of Mount Washington, reading a little Mark Twain at 2am becuase I can't get to sleep.

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
    18. Re:Free/E Not the problem by henben · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised that people always assume e-books are to be read on computer monitors. Try reading one on a monochrome Palm or Bookman. It's not at all uncomfortable.

    19. Re:Free/E Not the problem by IainHere · · Score: 1

      [i]4. Very easy to hold in one hand and turn pages. Try that with a paperback.[/i] [br][br] What sort of books are you reading?

    20. Re:Free/E Not the problem by salesgeek · · Score: 1
      Lots of technology has been promised to fix this, but where are the commercial products

      I don't think it's the technology so much as the application of technology. My PDA and my laptop both have very easy to read screens and are very portable and convient. But they both are vey expensive. I could buy a hundred books for the price of my PDA, and twice that in books plus an oak bookcase, a couple of nice lamps, a case of good brandy and a very nice arm chair and footstool for the price of the laptop.

      Also: Electrons lack the archival quality of paper. I only wish that big old leather bound Bible on the shelf was as easy to search as the electronic verison is (actually, I wish I'd read it more often). The average book I buy will probably be around after I die... I can't read the 5.25" floppy I bought in 1989.

      $G
      --
      -- $G
    21. Re:Free/E Not the problem by krenn · · Score: 1

      M@ I have a sneaking suspicion you're no where near 40 and have good eyesight. I'm over 40 and have poor (though well corrected) eyesight. Reading on my laptop works but that sucker is big (and as noted equal in cost to at least 100-200 paperbacks). Any PDA's I've looked at (Palm, visor, even the HP Jornada's and COMPAQ Ipaq's)
      still have relatively low resolution and are hard to read on with older eyes with presbyopic tendencies. Lousy printing is 600-1200 DPI, decent press stuff is 2400 DPI plus. Screens have busted the 100dpi barrier pretty regularly for a while now, but we're still an order of magnitude off from good quality printing. I can easily read 8pt type in a book, on a pda 8pt type would be an inscrutable blob. This is not to say online books are not useful. For things where your access is less linear (dictionaries, how to's, technical stuff, the Bible etc.) the ability to search for things or have linked indices is a real win. I have also enjoyed Baen's free library ( http://www.baen.com/library/) during lunch breaks, but for most purposes I suspect that the reports of the death of paper printing are premature.

    22. Re:Free/E Not the problem by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      For mainstream books the issue is more thorny. Naively you would think that publishing houses will loose all their power, and that authors started letting peope download their stuff at rates much, much lower than what would be paid for the book in a store. For some reason though, this did not happen to music. I wonder if publishing houses are as powerful and united as RIAA...

      As has been previously stated, the per-item cost of a CD is negligible. Most of the $ goes towards the creative and marketoid folks who promote the CD.

      E-books, OTOH, SHOULD have a significant discount, as printing + paper is a significant expense. And it doesn't help when ebooks are priced as "slightly discounted hardcovers" rather than "slightly discounted paperbacks."

      Personally, I think ebooks should work like gameboys: Have a hardware piece that acts as an indellible carrier of the book, like a modified SD chip or something, so the "license" and the "media" are identical.

      And, yes, I know that'd negate digial's "free" benefit... but a backlit display that doesn't die totally when it gets wet would be a nice thing with a significant market--plus it'd be (slightly) eco-friendlier, and you could upgrade your reader and get a boost to every book you've got...

      I've seen ebook readers, and the interface is VERY nice. Unfortunately, they're expensive, and there isn't critial mass to encourage adoption just yet.

  6. Teachers Pay Attention by soapvox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would be a great thing if teachers could entice children to take advantage of these free books to extend literacy. This could also possibly show the benefits of shortening the copyrights that keep getting extended by allowing educational institutions distribute the content and reduce overhead costs at the same time.

    1. Re:Teachers Pay Attention by NineNine · · Score: 1

      They already do this. They're called "libraries".

  7. BRUCE ECKEL! by FortKnox · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bruce Eckel has all of his "Thinking in" books available in pdf format on his webpage. You can also buy the hardbound version in local bookstores. So you can have your cake and eat it too. It seems like he's pretty successful in his method, too.

    I, personally, own a copy of Thinking in Java and Thinking in C++, and recommend it to all Java/C++ programmers. Check it out on the website, and buy a copy if you like it.

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:BRUCE ECKEL! by JustAnotherReader · · Score: 3, Interesting
      And just to point out the benefits of publishing Free As In Beer books: I've downloaded "Thinking In Java" (as have all my interns) just as FortKnox mentioned above. And yet, I've also purchased both the original and the 2nd edition paper version books (as have many of my interns). Why? Because it's still way easier to flip through a dead tree version of a book in order to find things. It's still easier to toss a paper book in your backpack and it's certainly easier to read the print and diagrams.

      Now, I must say that I have several e-books on my Visor and that works out just great when I go to lunch and want to read something while I eat. But I certainly wouldn't want to try to relax in bed at night while trying to read that tiny print on a dark screen. So I think what we have here is the idea of a new technology which is still valid, but the implementation of that technology hasn't caught up with the idea. Give me a cheap e-book reader the size and weight of a paperback book with high quality fonts on a readable background with enough memory to hold a couple dozen books and e-books would be seriously take off!

    2. Re:BRUCE ECKEL! by hoegg · · Score: 1

      100% agreement. He even posts betas of his future versions so that people can give feedback. I am using the Thinking in C# beta a lot in my current project.

    3. Re:BRUCE ECKEL! by Oloryn · · Score: 1
      Bruce Eckel [bruceeckel.com] has all of his "Thinking in" books available in pdf format on his webpage.

      And I've seen Palm versions, too, which can be handy. When I needed to read his "Thinking in Java", I snarfed the Palm version and put it on my Palm VIIx, making it fairly easy to read during idle times.

    4. Re:BRUCE ECKEL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure people would go out and buy very many of those book sized devices if that's all they do. IMO, if Palm or PocketPC were to come out with a device with a paper-back sized screen, but still ran the PIM OS as well, then that might fly. I know I'd be willing to buy one, because I already do a LOT of reading on my current Palm device. I think a terrific sized device would be something the size of a video cassette cartridge and about the thickness of a Palm Vx (nice and thin). Come to think of it, a very thin Newton would probably be pretty cool.

  8. Slashdot Reports Trivia About Free Books: +1, True by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    While the Grifter-In-Charge
    continues to rob the U.S.A.

    What about a free country?

    Respectfully,

    Woot

  9. Baen Free Library by Bonker · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the article:

    . Book publishers like Baen and O'Reilly, however, have found that they can increase sales of their printed books by giving away the digital versions for free. This has also been my own experience with my self-published physics textbooks. It's cheap marketing: readers can browse the digital book to see if it's something they want, and if they like it, they're willing to pay for the convenience of a printed copy.

    Strangely, the author fails to link to the Baen Free Library: http://www.baen.com/library/

    It's funny. Publishers are starting to get what Microsoft has known for a while. 'Piracy' is in reality free advertising. Why don't the record companies and movie studios get it?

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Baen Free Library by Nathanbp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      'Piracy' is in reality free advertising. Why don't the record companies and movie studios get it?

      Probably because there is nothing to be gained by buying a copy of movie or a song after pirating it, whereas for software you buy it for upgrades or tech support and for books you buy it so that you can hold it in your hands instead of reading on the computer screen. If the record and movie companies provided free low quality copies of their works, they might be able to use this to get people to buy them in high quality formats. But, as it stands now, the quality of a downloaded song or movie is good enough that people don't seem to think its worth buying it for the quality increase.

    2. Re:Baen Free Library by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Baen's done a wonderful job, with their free library, and their webscription service for new books (small fee, 4 books as they're edited, and a final digital copy... before the book's in dead tree form). And it's been up since 2000.

      It's interesting to read Mr. Flint's views on the subject of free ebooks, and the ultimate reasons for doing it... demonstration of princible... and profit, from free word of mouth advertising and to get people hooked on a series, and they pick up the dead tree edition of books that are currently unpublished in digital form.

      Take a read of Mr. Flint's views on everything at the site, you'll laugh and cry at how stupid some people can be.

    3. Re:Baen Free Library by Bonker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably because there is nothing to be gained by buying a copy of movie or a song after pirating it, whereas for software you buy it for upgrades or tech support and for books you buy it so that you can hold it in your hands instead of reading on the computer screen.

      By this same logic, most people who can download books can print them pretty cheaply if they don't use a laser printer. Upgrades can be just as easily pirated as original software.

      You're right about the tech support thing about software. You don't get a nice cover or dust jacket with a downloaded book, either, and have to keep it bound in notebook.

      By the same token, if you downloaded 'Lord of the Rings' on the internet, you didn't get extras like trailers, directors' comments, animated interactive menus, mini-posters, etc... When you buy a CD you get a lot of the same stuff. CD's are a bad example, though, because the Music industry is trying as hard as it can to give as little to their customers as they can get away with.

      For a better example, when the Hellsing anime was released in Japan, I downloaded fansubs of the show online. When it was released in the U.S., I bought the DVD. Inside the Vol2. DVD, I got a cool miniposter of Alucard and Cellas, a post card, and a really neat Hellsign sew-on/iron-on patch.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    4. Re:Baen Free Library by Syncdata · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Book publishers like Baen and O'Reilly, however, have found that they can increase sales of their printed books by giving away the digital versions for free... 'Piracy' is in reality free advertising. Why don't the record companies and movie studios get it?

      Well, there is a difference between reading and audio. People don't want to get monitor eyestrain from pleasure reading, and a printed book is usually quite portable. Putting a book out for free will entice a user to purchase the physical copy, for the aforementioned benefits, whereas the same cannot be said for MP3s, which suffer little loss in fidelity or functionality in the trip from .cda to .mp3.
      Personally, I still wouldn't give the whole book away, I'd pull an Orson Scott Cardand post the first three chapters online to hook in readers.

      --
      "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    5. Re:Baen Free Library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and not to mention that ripping from CD to computer to whatever increases value a great deal because of portability and ability to create mixes. Buying a cd that has to be played in a cd player and cannot be rearranged does not increase value; buying a book increases value--portability, readibility and durability. (Ok, sorry about the *ility terms--it's starting to sound like a marketing rant.)

    6. Re:Baen Free Library by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Interesting
      By this same logic, most people who can download books can print them pretty cheaply if they don't use a laser printer.
      It depends on the book. For most books, it is not possible to print it yourself at a price lower than what it costs at a bookstore. For instance, a paperback novel at $7 is cheaper than the paper and ink cartridges you'd need to pay for to print it on an inkjet printer. Also, if you print it yourself, you're getting an inferior product: it's single-sided, and it's not bound.

      The main exception I'm aware of is overpriced college textbooks. For example, my own free textbook is aimed at a market (introductory physics without calculus) where the standard price is $120. The price of do-it-yourself printing is more like $60, and it's no coincidence that if you buy a [rinted copy of my 6-volume set from me, the price adds up to a little more than $60.

    7. Re:Baen Free Library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been buying the online version of Baen's books since they started this service. I've managed to accumulate over 50 books of which I've read about half so far. I've tried reading them on my 19 inch monitor, on my laptop screen and on my on my Palm m125. The Palm works the best of the lot, all things considered. I've got about 10 books on it presently and it goes where ever I go. I'm still keeping my eyes open for the ultimate book reader for an affordable price but the Palm works surprisingly well for now.


      Baen does the free chapter thing too for most if not all new releases. They give away about the first third of the book. They generally make the chapters available just before the hard cover version of the book comes out. They used to do this before they started offering the books for sale online and I would get so wrapped up in the sample chapters that I'd end up buying the hardcover rather than waiting until the paperback version came out. In this respect, ebooks have been much cheaper for me!

    8. Re:Baen Free Library by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      It is sheer idiocy to print anything more than a page or two in length on an Injet printer. The ink for those things is obscenely expensive. Hell, the whole 'ink cartel' thing might be what got the wrong sorts of rats to climb on board at Hewlett-Packard and ruin the company. Laser printers cost a magnitude less per page to print. And a laser printed copy can be as good or better than a mass published book. My LaserJet 5P makes it fairly easy to do doublesided printing by doing odd/even print jobs and diverting the pages to the alternative trays to feed it through twice.

    9. Re:Baen Free Library by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      totally agree. laser printer prints run around $0.015/page for toner and about $6.00/ream for nice (but not too nice) paper. So a 500 page book would print out at about $14, plus about $3 to bind it at Kinkos, or somewhere else that can do a nice sealed velo bind for a grand total of $17 make it $25 and you have a nice profit margin/per book although you'd still need to sell a lot to make the original time invested in producing a 500 page book worth while, unless it was simply an itch that you needed to scratch.

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    10. Re:Baen Free Library by isorox · · Score: 2
      Probably because there is nothing to be gained by buying a copy of movie or a song after pirating it

      Apart from TShirts, concert tickets, furthur albums with lyrics and pictures and extras and stuff, to see it on the big screen if it ever comes out in your country, to buy on DVD, to buy a DVD player, to buy other DVD's.

      Case in point.
      • I downloaded SG1 episodes when they broadcast in america (months before the UK).
      • This encouraged me to buy a DVD rom and DVD's, as I learnt that I could watch things on my computer in relative comfort.
      • This then made me buy a dvd player (so I could watch it in the living room with friends on a 20" TV - and they could use it.
      • This led me to buying a widescreen TV, to take advantage of the 16:9 SG1 dvd's, and other films.
      • This then led me to buying a 5.1 amplifier and surround sound speakers to get the full effect.


      Thats arround $1,000 hardware and $1800 DVD's. All from downloading SG1 epsidoes.

      Piracy doesnt help the MPAA, no sir!
    11. Re:Baen Free Library by Nathanbp · · Score: 1

      Ok, Ok, Perhaps I should have said there is more to be gained by buying a book or piece of software after pirating it than by buying a movie or song after pirating it.
      I certainly agree that I would rather watch movies on my 60" TV than on my 19" computer screen. However, my point still holds for music. (I think.)

    12. Re:Baen Free Library by PacoTaco · · Score: 2
      If the record and movie companies provided free low quality copies of their works, they might be able to use this to get people to buy them in high quality formats.

      This would never work. With the crap they're been churning out lately, how would you tell the difference between the high and low quality formats?

    13. Re:Baen Free Library by isorox · · Score: 2

      A reason I buy DVD's is that they arent ridicuously expensive. CD's are. However songs are so ten-a-penny now its not even worth downloading them. I rarely even play my mp3's (most ripped from my parents collection when I left home) - Theres usually something on one of the 15 radio stations.

    14. Re:Baen Free Library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you actually buy cartridges. I thought only idiots bought cartridges. If you can't figure out how the refill kit works then perhaps you should pay the money for the laser, but you shouldn't be offering advice on the costs of printing online materials because you're babbling shit. I use an ink jet for far less than the cost of a laser with a much higher resolution that does nine pages a minute and only cost sixty bucks new. And a ream of paper around here can be had for two bucks.

    15. Re:Baen Free Library by tadheckaman · · Score: 0

      I have a Laser printer with a duplexer... I can (have) printed many books on it, on both sides. takes a bot of paper, but its nice to print something out in a book form.

      --
      My potato gun was confiscated by the United Nations. They said I wasn't allowed to have weapons of mash destruction.
    16. Re:Baen Free Library by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      How often do you have to replace those 'refillable' cartridges with new ones? The smudgy mess that a refilled cartridge produces is hardly what anybody wants. The smudgy mess that ANY inkjet page becomes with a little exposure to moisture isn't what anybody wants.

      Or do you shoplift cartridges?

    17. Re:Baen Free Library by Jason+Earl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Three chapters might be enough for Orson Scott Card, who already has a fairly large following, but it certainly isn't enough for authors that are less well known. Besides, why be stingy? If you aren't going to put the whole book up on the Internet what does it hurt to put nearly all of the book on the Internet? You still have to buy the book to find out how it ends, and no one is likely to read 80% of a book and then not finish it.

      The folks at Baen aren't stupid. Most sci-fi/fantasy novels nowadays are actually part of a series, and Baen isn't giving away any series in its entirety. I have bought several books from them from authors I had never heard of because I liked the books I was able to read for free.

      I actually prefer reading on my Visor, and I refuse to buy encrypted ebooks, and that means that baen.com and fictionwise.com are getting the lion's share of my book dollars.

    18. Re:Baen Free Library by mpe · · Score: 2

      Laser printers cost a magnitude less per page to print. And a laser printed copy can be as good or better than a mass published book.

      Considering standard of paper used in many books, it would hardly be suprising if a laser printed copy were better. Just that the capital costs are rather higher than with an inkjet printer.

      Laser printers cost a magnitude less per page to print. And a laser printed copy can be as good or better than a mass published book.

      Plenty of larger laser printers have a duplexing option. Also something like a LJ 4100 prints considerably quicker than a 5P.

    19. Re:Baen Free Library by mpe · · Score: 2

      totally agree. laser printer prints run around $0.015/page for toner and about $6.00/ream for nice (but not too nice) paper. So a 500 page book would print out at about $14, plus about $3 to bind it at Kinkos, or somewhere else that can do a nice sealed velo bind for a grand total of $17 make it $25 and you have a nice profit margin/per book although you'd still need to sell a lot to make the original time invested in producing a 500 page book worth while, unless it was simply an itch that you needed to scratch.

      Depends what the cover prise of the book was in the first place. Also this probably isn't an unreasonable for a lending library. If the result is a better quality of book, with better bindings. Currently all libraries can do is laminate the covers of paperback books. But that dosn't help with quality of paper or glue.

    20. Re:Baen Free Library by WWWWolf · · Score: 2
      Probably because there is nothing to be gained by buying a copy of movie or a song after pirating it,

      Why do I buy DVDs even when I could get the movies online? A few things: Quality (no, DivX isn't "near DVD quality" =), the sound (stereo MP3? Jesus), extras, the subtitles (good if I can get English subs, let alone Finnish)...

      ...and there's always the same thing that audiophiles say about CDs and LPs: they look great on shelf and are fun to browse in the stores and in your own collection.

      I'm a collector person. I've always been one. The small stack of burned CDs that have DivX movies just doesn't feel the same as the sight of the ~50 DVDs sitting on the shelf. You know, hard to explain, but there's always that.

      To me, DivX stuff is usually nothing more than a free version of movie rental. I know I'll be buying the DVDs of a couple of movies I recently downloaded - as soon as I have the money =)

      I like to look at it this way: Back in the VHS era, owning a copy of movie on VHS was not fun. You had a crappy copy of a movie. Then DVDs came, and suddently, it made sense to own a movie in this format: Great quality, great stuff. It made sense to first see the movie in all its glory in the theater, then get the DVD to see it in home in almost as impressive environment, with all the extra stuff. It enrichened the movie experience a great deal.

      While DivX is in a way return to VHS era. It's still just a movie. Still technically not as convinient, nice or featureful as DVD. It is like renting the VHS tape in a way: You can see what the movie is like, you can decide if it's a good movie - but it isn't as nice as getting the thing on DVD or seeing it in the theater.

      I wish I could say the same about CDs, though - they're severely overpriced compared to their technical level. Somehow CDs have not felt the same since music videos started coming out on DVDs =)

  10. You gotta love it... by pVoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I just downloaded the [5] Warren Siegel, Fields book...

    I have to admit I take a certain joy in seeing that a whole book on fields is a mere 3 Meg download.

  11. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 1

    The "free book" support of the authors is critical for sucess. Ultimately though, the publishers are typically the biggest foes to 'free' publications. We are at the cross-roads of distribution models. Regardless of online versions of books, and the print at home jobs, I like the heft and smell of a well aged bound book.

    As an aside, I heard that it was a neck bone. Ironically, I am savoring a frosty King-Bing right now. Mmmmm, Calamari-Peach blend.

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  12. cool, but... by scrod98 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Part of the problem with digital books wasn't just the price, but the format on-screen. Most people (i.e. the general public) won't sit and read from a computer screen for the length of time to read a book. Now, surfing for pron or killin' aliens is a different matter...

    --
    LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
    1. Re:cool, but... by weston · · Score: 2

      Some of the best darn free books out there are available as PDFs -- good for on-screen reading, fine for printing out if you want to do that.

      The one I linked to, "manual," is a mix of fiction and personal narratives and something else. Great stuff.

  13. Free Universes by ParnBR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It would be nice if we also had something like free literary universes. I mean, you could write fiction which would add to an existing universe and its storylines. In the mentioned article, they touch the subject of open-source books. Although there's some intriguing thought there, I don't think the issue is taken broadly. It seems the original article doesn't focus in any specific book genre, but I think it's safe to assume it deals more specifically to reference books, not literary books. Any further thoughts on this?

    --
    My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
    1. Re:Free Universes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. What a great idea. You go first!

      Here...I'll start you off:

      There was a man who lived in an old house, with three cats and a wife.

      See! It's easy. Think of the potential in that scenario! It's limited only by your imagination.

    2. Re:Free Universes by rotwhylr · · Score: 1

      Excellent idea! Consistency is the biggest obstacle I can see (making sure that the different additions to the storyline don't violate each others' trivia/characters/place/time/etc.) But even with that concern, I think this would be great.

      --
      -- Windows is not simply installed on a computer; it is inflicted.
    3. Re:Free Universes by raydobbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The main problem with free (as in speech) universes is that someone had to labor to produce it - they had to have the inspiration to come up with it. Simply writing a line, and handing it to the next person is NOT what I believe this person had in mind.

      Many writers feel very passionately about their settings, their characters, and their hard work. As an unpublished writer, I cringe every time people come up with an non-cannonical version of this, that, or the other thing - totally ruining the vision of characters, places, and events simply because the author didn't take the time to do his research.

      With that said, however - the concept (if you could make it work, and enforce integrity) of free universes is appealing in that the story, and your characters live on after either you have died, or have moved on to other things.

    4. Re:Free Universes by Frater+219 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It would be nice if we also had something like free literary universes. I mean, you could write fiction which would add to an existing universe and its storylines.

      Aside from fanfic with its dubious legal status and contention with "canon", there is one example of this very idea which Slashdot readers may be familiar with: the Cthulhu Mythos.

      The Mythos was begun by H. P. Lovecraft, who encouraged his fans to write stories in his settings. (There was little audience for the horror-SF genre at the time, and every good story was a boon to its popularity.) After Lovecraft's death, and to the present day, followers have continued to write and publish stories featuring Lovecraft's strange gods and cosmic horrors.

      Like more commercially produced shared settings such as Star Trek, the Mythos and associated tales have spawned movies, magazines, and even a roleplaying game.

      Sad to say, Lovecraft died in obscurity and poverty, which does not say much for starting a freely expandable universe as a means of employment. Nonetheless, it has certainly been a success in terms of storytelling.

      (Lovecraft was by no means the only author who has invited fans to write in his universe. Another, rather more recently, told his readers to go ahead and write stories in his universe -- and then rescinded the offer after a fan wrote a story that offended him! The author in question was Larry Niven; the universe was Known Space; the fan was Elf Sternberg; the story was "The Only Fair Game".)

    5. Re:Free Universes by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Oh my. I not flaming, but I feel I should say something. This really only applies to works of fiction. Maybe non-fiction is less prone to the kind of disasters I've heard about.

      Some close friends of mine are involved in exactly this kind of thing. They're part of this Star Wars gaming club called Rebel Squadrons. Mostly they fly X-Wing Alliance or X-Wing vs. TIE Fighter matches against each other and against members of other clubs. They've also got this Star Wars writing group called Aurora Force, which is a "fleet" within the main RS structure.

      It's pretty much like you describe. At least, the intentions of this group were like that when it was founded. In practise, personal politics and petty rivalries get in the way. Writers write themselves in as unkillable, godlike characters, and kill off characters created by rival authors.

      People write about new superships, which leads other writers to create even more grandiose fictional ships. There's more technobabble than your average Voyager episode, and very little attention to plot more deep than "character shags every other character of the opposite sex, gains immense powers, and is basically a bad-ass mofo". A few people try to write with more attention to realistic (well, as much as SW can be realistic) characters and plots, but they're drowned in the noise.

      And that's not even mentioning the personality cults that are rife within the whole RS. (Aside from the Mikez, of course. And any Mikez here, don't salute. This is a family website.)

      And that's my indirect experience with collaborative writing. It's an extreme, but I felt I had to say something. Does anyone have any happier experiences?

    6. Re:Free Universes by The+Red+Rooster · · Score: 1

      I have Two Words for you:

      Thieves' World

      Collaborative writing at it's very best.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    7. Re:Free Universes by Cyn · · Score: 1

      Didn't Isaac Asimov set out some guidelines for a fictional universe that many aspiring authors have "writ against" - they have a couple guidelines they have to follow but other than that, they're open range within his created universe.

      Maybe I'm missing something - isn't that what you're referring to?

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    8. Re:Free Universes by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      One way to do keep the Universe "clean" is to have the original Creator/Writer (or a trusted group) review stories and designate them as "Canon" if it is determined that the story fits into said universe, "Alternate" if the story is good, but violates some item Canon, or "no designation" if the story is bad/does not fit the Universe at all. Readers would be free to decide what works they want to read (the designation or lack thereof would not prevent the story from being put on the net). The original Creator/Writer(s) would still have control through a free copyright license like the GPL. The individual writers would still have control of their works as long as they followed the Universe's GPL license (much like free software today).



      As an unpublished writer, I cringe every time people come up with an non-cannonical version of this, that, or the other thing - totally ruining the vision of characters, places, and events simply because the author didn't take the time to do his research.


      The above scheme would not eliminate these kind of stories, but it would give you control over what is considered "canon" in your universe, and would also give the fan writer a chance to "fix" his story so it gets a "canon" rating. If the fan writer decides not to "fix" the story, then other fans of your Universe know that this story is not canon, and can decide to read or not to read it as they wish. This allows for you maintain control of your Universe without being nasty.


      --
      Beware of Sleestak
  14. ok so its not free but... by carpe_noctem · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really love the safari service at oreilly. You can basically check out 5 books for 10$ per month. Pretty nice, because I really love oreilly books, but couldn't afford to buy hard copies of them all. Unfortunately, the bastard company that runs this has a pretty crappy pricing model (automatic billing, and when you cancel your account, it is inactive immediately rather than at the end of the billing period).

    Still, I think this is a good compromise, in the same way that if artists sold their cd's online for a reasonabele amount of money, people would be less tempted to pirate their respective work.

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    1. Re:ok so its not free but... by SquadBoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And of course O'Reilly produces a lot of free as in beer and speach content. And it pays off for them because I know a lot of people like myself who will buy a dead tree version of a free book just to encourage such behavior. All in all O'Relly rules.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    2. Re:ok so its not free but... by Lando · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I like safari as well, but unlike you I actually have most of the books that they make available...

      It's nice to see the new books come out and decide if I want to get them... But mainly I use the service as a reference... I can access the site anywhere, so if I am on a customer's site and need to look up something, it's pretty easy to jump in..

      I keep several slots free just for this reason, I can pick whatever book I need at the time.

      Good service, though I would like a bit better user interface.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    3. Re:ok so its not free but... by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Informative
      In general O'Reilly has been one of the best publishers when it comes to free books. Their open book program has a lot of books in it that, unlike the Safari books, are free as in beer.

      However, they also seem to be contributing to this disturbing trend of ``un-freeing'' free books. This book used to be free at the author's web page. If you click on the link, you'll find that it no longer exists. The book is no longer free, and you can only get the electronic version through Safari.

  15. Interesting Cathedral. by drhairston · · Score: 2

    Eric Raymond's name is closely associated with the bazaar model, while Richard Stallman's evokes the cathedral

    I appear to have made a vast mistake when reading and interpreting Mr. Raymond's work - it was my impression that his 'Cathedral' metaphor was used to describe closed, proprietary software design similar to Microsoft's, not Stallman's GPL'd design method. Was I wrong? Or is the author wrong?

    --
    Dr. Joseph Hairston
    Superintendent, CCBC
    1. Re:Interesting Cathedral. by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Richard Stallman definatly represents the Bizarre.

      "Rhinophytonecrophilia" comes to mind.

    2. Re:Interesting Cathedral. by jmv · · Score: 2

      No cathedral means that the development is centralized and it applies to most of RMS is doing. I think it may also apply to proprietaty software too, since it's mostly about development process, not free/non-free issues.

    3. Re:Interesting Cathedral. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This author is wrong.

    4. Re:Interesting Cathedral. by Xandis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh, the original article certainly had a LOT to chew on with respect to Raymond, failure of Nupedia (did it fail?), Stallman, etc.

      The GPL is not a design method it is license. How one actually develops the project might be the author's point. Closed shop development can produce a GPL'd product. Also, it might just be the notion of control of a project - is it rigid (hierarchical) or flexible (very flat).

      I got the feeling that the author is pointing out how an INDIVIDUAL can produce a great product (like his textbooks) if he has access to royalty-free information that he can use in his own work.

      Note how the author points out Raymond's use of the cathedral approach to write his popular book. Essentially that was Raymond ALONE producing a work. Likewise, Stallman with EMACS - on his own but using other's work as well.

      Look at this quote:

      "The failure of the bazaar model with free books might not seem surprising, since to most people it sounds like the silly party game where each person takes a turn adding more onto a story. We normally assume that an author has a unique voice, and that authorship can't be delegated."

      I really think his point is that lots of people editing, revising, adding chapters, fixing, etc. doesn't apply as well to books...except in the case of technical documentation.

      For example, an author who has a particular teaching method and writing style that he wants to consistently use across chapters will not (and should not) be open to others messing with his text outside of the purely technical side of things. The end result though can be something that is free for all to change, edit, etc.

      I like the author's approach because creativity usually means the artist/author/etc. realizes his own ideas in the form of the project. Projects that are not purely technical may not be best done with bazaar like methods. Too many chefs spoil the broth :) Construction by committee often doesn't yield very artistic results. etc.

      Basically, realize your own project goals and then allow others to benefit as they want from them.

    5. Re:Interesting Cathedral. by ray-auch · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You have indeed made a mistake, but (judging by other replies) it is a common one.

      To quote ESR's paper:
      I believed that the most important software (operating systems and really large tools like the Emacs programming editor) needed to be built like cathedrals, carefully crafted by individual wizards or small bands of mages working in splendid isolation, with no beta to be released before its time.
      I don't see how this can possibly be interpreted as Proprietary == Cathedral. There are plenty of other hints that it's Linux == Bazaar, GNU == Cathedral.

      Probably most proprietary software is also cathedral, simply due to small number of developers with eyes on the code, but there are organisations which have large enough development teams that they could possibly run a project bazaar-style without opening it up outside the organisation.
    6. Re:Interesting Cathedral. by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Raymond's 'Cathedral and the Bazaar' essay was originally written as a criticism of the small-group centralized way that Stallman and his team develop GNU Emacs.

      This fact seems to have largely been swept under the carpet, it is dismaying how many people think it's an anti-Microsoft essay. It was a polemic within the open source community.

    7. Re:Interesting Cathedral. by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      failure of Nupedia (did it fail?)
      It's been several years now, and they only have 23 articles. Since their stated goal was to become an open-content encyclopedia as big as the Encyclopedia Britannica, I think that means they failed -- at this rate, it would take them a thousand years.

      There was also this horrible incident, which I think caused a lot of confusion and might have taken away some of their momentum.

    8. Re:Interesting Cathedral. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      GPL is not a design method - it is a software license. ESR's models are "cathedral" - meaning centralised development, and "bazaar" - meaning a more decentralised, democratic model.


      For what it is worth, I think that there is a lot to be said for the cathedral model, and that a lot of the things ESR says in favour of the bazaar model are wrong. IMO for example, many eyes do not make all bugs shallow.

  16. Self-publishing and book thumbing. by ChicoLance · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's great that with the Internet, it's gotten easier to self-publish your own works. Just like web pages, free books are a way for anybody to get the point out to the general public. However, now that anybody is allowed to do this, now the general public has figure out the difference between the good and the bad.

    As far as e-books go, they've been promising that we'll have everything on microfiche since the 60's, and that the book is dead. Until I can read a book online and be able to find a subject quickly by "thumbing" though the book, there will always be room for paper books.

    1. Re:Self-publishing and book thumbing. by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      I think "thumbing through" is overrated, when you can just grep for any string or word in the whole text.

  17. Ebooks. by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

    E-Books didnt drop off the face of the planet, they're still around and in wide distribution. They're just not official, authorized, or legal.
    Search around and its pretty easy to find whatever book you want in .txt form. Search around for 'bookwarez'.

    --
    Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  18. Orson Scott Card on free books... by emarkp · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I tried to post this as an article, but it was rejected.

    Orson Scott Card (author of Ender's Game) has posted a copy of his short story Angles for free on his website . He also wrote an interesting piece about copyright back in May of this year. An interesting quote:

    And for those who say, Ah, but would you put your books online where people could download them for free? -- well, my answer is, I not only would, I did. Until the bookstore chains made me stop.

    It didn't cost me royalties. It widened my audience. But try persuading a greedy paranoid of that!

    He also routinely puts up the first few chapters of his books online, before they're published so you can get a taste of them before buying. I'm surprised more people don't have this attitude.
    1. Re:Orson Scott Card on free books... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Didn't know he'd done that, but it explains why there are a billion copies of his works floating around.

      Personally, when I find an ebook that I like, I'm not happy til I also acquire a deadtree copy (ditto for MP3s and hardcopy albums, BTW). This is yet another reason why when I moved last year, I found myself toting along two *full* pickup loads of books (almost up to the topper's roof). Oh my aching back!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  19. e-boooks will work by Tensor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ebooks will work as soon as there are viable, usable devices for everyone to read them on.

    Pdas at $500 with tiny screens to read on won't do. Sure there are pluses to them, reading in total darkness is cool, it makes you more "attuned" to what you are reading (less distractions around for your eyes to wander). But they are not for everyone. And reading them on your large computer screen sucks for various reasons, posture is not inteneded for reading for one. ITs ok for manuals and on line help, beacuse you are using the program at the same time, but -at lest for me- ebooks? nah.

    Free ebooks are another thing altogether. You download them cos they're free, and to "build up" an elibrary, it doesn't mean you actually read them all. Eg: I d/l all Verne's books and only reread 2000 leagues, and Journey, I have a jornada i use almost solely as a contacts and ebook reader.

  20. Definition of "book" by ohboy-sleep · · Score: 3, Funny

    When they say they're free books, do they mean novel-length stories with real plots, or do they mean things like Seven-of-Nine/Highlander crossover fan-fiction?

    1. Re:Definition of "book" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duncan MacLeod rules!

    2. Re:Definition of "book" by Myco · · Score: 2

      Ah, so you've seen my work! Like it, did you?

    3. Re:Definition of "book" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he was talking about your mom's vaginal vapour desease.

    4. Re:Definition of "book" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I've read Dostoyevsky's Crime and Punishment on my Palm. Does that count?

  21. More books. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Eckel gets it.

    Here's more gratis books. Site 1 | Site 2 (Math)

  22. BookCrossing by webword · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some people will be interested in BookCrossing.

    From the site: "What is BookCrossing, you ask? It's a global book club that crosses time and space. It's a reading group that knows no geographical boundaries. Do you like free books? How about free book clubs?. Well, the books our members leave in the wild are free... but it's the act of freeing books that points to the heart of BookCrossing. Book trading has never been more exciting, more serendipitous, than with BookCrossing. Our goal, simply, is to make the whole world a library. BookCrossing is a book exchange of infinite proportion, the first and only of its kind."

  23. Philip Greenspun books by joesao · · Score: 2, Informative
    No mention of Philg books, apparently.

    His Travels With Samantha was one of the first online free books ever, circa 1992-3. Later, he wrote the stupendous book on web publishing, Philip and Alex's Guide to Web Publishing with his samoyed, Alex.

    Two very good reads by a very good writer. Sorry, I know some people don't like Philip and this isn't flamebait -- I truly admire many of his initiatives, like the free Remindme and Clickthrough services, in addition to the remarkable photo.net which has grown enormous tentacles nowadays. Both books are intimately related to those efforts.

    1. Re:Philip Greenspun books by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      How about reviewing them here on The Assayer?

  24. Free Books have been by jsav40 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a staple on my PDA ever since I acquired it. No it is not convenient to read in that format but it is very handy to have a dozen or so books on my Handspring, especially while traveling. I will certainly embrace the addition of newer titles- most of what has been availble until mow has been Project Gutenberg/public domain stuff.

  25. Project Gutenberg by forged · · Score: 5, Informative

    Funny that no one has mentionned Project Gutenberg so far. If you don't know what they do, check it out here.

    1. Re:Project Gutenberg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you not read the post above you?

    2. Re:Project Gutenberg by circusnews · · Score: 1

      I posted this the other day, but it seems like I should post it again. I have placed my listing of all of the ebook projects I know about online at http://www.stevensantos.com/misc/ebook.txt
      This listing includes some 40 ebook projects.

      Enjoy!

  26. O'Reilly by jericho4.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Three weeks after puchasing 'Linux Device Drivers, 2nd Ed.', I found some time to dig into it. A few pages into it, I was suprised to discover the sentence; 'The authors have chosen to make this book freely available under the GNU Free Documentation License'.

    Well, I kinda with I had my $40, but I was glad in the end to have paid for it. Kudos to O'Reilly, Alessandro Rubini and Jonathan Corbet for doing it, like I need another reason to like O'Reilly. I hope examples like these will encourage others to do the same, after all, free software can be close to useless without documentation.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  27. Nice idea, but by Chastitina · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I pick up a book, it is to escape from staring at the monitor all day. I like to kick back with a nice hot cup of tea and one of my cats in my lap & relax, which somehow isn't possible even with my comfy computer setup.

    While I have never depended on a "publisher to make an editorial decision," I do depend on my friends & get most of my recommendations from folks who only turn on a PC to check e-mail. This resulted in my dropping over $100 yesterday, alone on stuff such as Dylan Thomas, Bukowski, Pratchett, Le Guin, Naipail, and Hardy. Many of these are copyrighted classics that won't be available online for another 75+ years and all are well worth paying $7-35 for a lifetime of enjoyment. Yes, they'll sit on my shelf and represent killed trees, but the electricity required to power my PC long enough was probably generated with coal that will shorten the lives of even more trees and people as well. My library, on the other hand, is passed around to all my interested friends and family, a warm, physical, and comforting way to share enjoyment of the greatest poetry and prose. As with all great electronic innovations, "free" online books bypass the enjoyable interpersonal element, be it of sharing a story or chatting with the librarian.

    Yes, there could be some great literature online & maybe someday I'll find something work getting a headache to read. For now, however, I'm content with a system that ain't broke; the bookstore when I've got the money and the library when I don't.

    1. Re:Nice idea, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can we give the "dead trees" image a rest? We can grow new trees, and do. It's hardly the same situation as, say, oil or copper or some other resource that can grow back in a few years.

    2. Re:Nice idea, but by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Okay, how about used trees? As contrasted to new trees :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Nice idea, but by renard · · Score: 4, Insightful
      While I have never depended on a "publisher to make an editorial decision," I do depend on my friends....

      This is a silly thing to say, since by reading only published books you are in fact doing precisely that. Where do you think your friends get their book leads? Talking to author agents at book conventions and trolling through publishers' slush piles? How many unpublished manuscripts have you read? Ever? It is even harder to get one of those in bound form than free and online.

      -renard

    4. Re:Nice idea, but by Chastitina · · Score: 1

      This is a silly thing to say, since by reading only published books you are in fact doing precisely that.

      This is a silly assumption, as I never said I read only published books. I simply do not care to read books online, preferring the comfort and social aspects of Real Life.

      How many unpublished manuscripts have you read? Ever?

      Quite a few, actually. *None* of them online, however & most of them in someone's living room.

      A number of my friends are writers & poets, most of whom are unpublished. One of the great things about socializing in Real Life is getting leads for great material you'd otherwise never look at, published or unpublished. (How many folks today will voluntarily pick up "Return of the Native" or "The Inferno"?)

      Perhaps someday someone will point out a gem online & maybe I'll print it out in small font with narrow margins and read it. When most of one's literary social circle doesn't use computers for other than e-mail and word processing, however, that's highly unlikely.

    5. Re:Nice idea, but by makanaka · · Score: 1

      "Naipail"? Do you mean Naipaul as in V.S. Naipaul instead?

  28. I think many are missing the point. by eddy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, and that is the incentative!

    It's frustrating seeing all these objections to the format. Much of the point of these free books is to get people hooked and get them to buy the real thing, right? Right?

    It's not dead-tree _versus_ electronic. It's dead-tree _in addition to_ electronic. That's the key.

    The electronic version; cheap, not as comfortable to read, good for searching/citing.
    dead-tree version; expensive, very comfortable to read, not made for searching, looks good on shelf.

    See how they complement each other?

    I love the free books out there. I think it's brilliant. I've read Eckels material and I've recommended it to many many people based on the "check out the electronic version". I hope he's doing well.

    The format issue notwithstanding, one great point is reader interaction and feedback. Publishing during the drafting period seems like a good way to get extra proofing and feedback, which makes for a better product, and better products sell more (music excepted :-o)

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:I think many are missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, and that is the incentative!

      Mr. President, is that you?

  29. What's this guy smoking? by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For all the open-source software movement's successes, I'm not aware of any case in which an entrenched proprietary program was pushed out of first place in the market by open-source software.

    Linux was in 1999 (I don't know how it is today) the most widely used server operating system on the internet.

    Apache is the top web server.

    PHP has surpassed ASP in terms of number of users and is now the most widely used server side scripting language.

    Sendmail is the leading email server (over, for example, Microsoft Exchange).

    OpenSSH is the Internet's most widely used implementation of SSH.

    Granted, some of these may never have pushed anything other than other OSS/FS products out of first place (such as Apache, whose predecessor was the NCSA web server), but aren't there a gazillion other examples anyway? I have a hard time taking anyone who makes such bold assertions, without even trying to first evaluate them, seriously.

    --

    "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    1. Re:What's this guy smoking? by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      Granted, some of these may never have pushed anything other than other OSS/FS products out of first place
      I think you answered your own question. None of your examples show open-source software displacing a preexisting proprietary app that was #1 in its category.

    2. Re:What's this guy smoking? by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 2

      None of your examples show open-source software displacing a preexisting proprietary app that was #1 in its category.

      Really? You think that there were no operating systems before 1999? Or no Internet? Or that ASP is not proprietary (sure, ASP is a language, if you're going to nitpick, but the software associated with it is proprietary)?

      And those were just off the top of my head. Like I said, of course there are other examples. Don't be disingenious.

      --

      "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    3. Re:What's this guy smoking? by kcurrie · · Score: 1

      The OpenSSH example holds.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself.
    4. Re:What's this guy smoking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GCC has replaced proprietary compilers more-or-less completely in the embedded market.

    5. Re:What's this guy smoking? by Samrobb · · Score: 2
      None of your examples show open-source software displacing a preexisting proprietary app that was #1 in its category.

      The opposite is true, as well - none of the the examples show a proprietary app displacing a pre-existing open-source that was #1 in its category.

      At a guess, inerta has a lot to do with any software package maintaining its #1 position. Once you're in that slot, it take a lot of effort for another application to come along and displace the leader, and people will not be willing to make that effort without an obvious benefit. In this case, open-source software has two advantages that proprietary software can't match: the ability to modify the source code and essentially create a new product, coupled with a reduced cost (and in some cases, a dramatically reduced cost).

      Given this, the only way proprietary software can obtain or remain in a #1 slot is to have features and capabilities that cannot be matched by open-source software. Once customers can have an product with identical capabilities for free, the proprietary product has to pull out all the stops and excel in terms of features, usability, etc. in order to obtain or maintain a #1 position. That's a loosing proposition, though, because while open-source software can always (eventually) match a proprietary app, feature for feature, proprietary apps will never be able to effectively match open-source apps on cost. At that point, the only thing keeping a proprietary app in a #1 slot is user inertia - something that is beyond the direct control of a software vendor.

      I think MS understands this - their focus is on integration. Buy an MS OS, an MS web server, an MS database, and use MS languages and technologies to connect them all. The goal is to deliver a gestalt package that is worth more than the sum of it's parts, because each part is designed to work well in cooperation with each other. This is the one area where proprietary software still has a minor advantage over open-source, and I expect that MS will push it to the limits - as evidenced by their attempts to leverage a #1 market share desktop OS into a #1 market share web browser, into a #1 market share web server, into a #1 market share database... etc., etc., etc. The fact that a company with pockets as deep as MS still can't displace Apache is, IMHO, a pretty strong argument that even app integration is not anywhere near as strong an incentive as MS might think.

      Still, integration is really just another set of technical features that can be matched by open source software. Whether or not it ever will be, though, is still an open question.

      --
      "Great men are not always wise: neither do the aged understand judgement." Job 32:9
  30. Why I like to write free web books by MarkWatson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This seems a little obvious, but I might as well say it: The Internet is all about relativley small groups of people getting together who share common interests. I think that self publishing on the web, like maintaining personal web sites, is an obvious way to share information and make contacts with people with similar interests.

    People always seem to be at their best when in small groups. The internet has the positive affect of cutting out the middleman and in some cases, perhaps slows down globalization (sometimes a good thing, but usually not - globalization tends to hurt people in developing countries who have the least).

    It is a great feeling to publish a real physical book, but I have found that I have had to make at least two compromises with the traditional publishing process, mainly:

    • constrained to write about popular subjects
    • books that get out of date technologically are still sold (for many of my published books, I really liked them when they were fresh, but 4 or 5 years later, they seemed really dated, but were still being sold)
    Anyway, when writing free web books, an author (like me!) can choose topics that are interesting but niche. I beg for small donations for my free web books, and I am pleasantly surprised at the amount of donations that I receive (currently, I get 3 or 4 cents per download, on the average, in donations).

    I am working on a third free web book (The Software Design Book), so I do believe in this process.

    -Mark

  31. About reading e-books from monitors by NetDanzr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have the feeling that palm-held devices are becoming the most widely-used platforms for e-books, not computers with their monitors. Owning a Sony Clie, I have't read a paper-based book for over a year now. In fact, my eyes adjust to the small screen better than to printed books.

    1. Re:About reading e-books from monitors by meehawl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't like to try reading some Joyce or Camus -- with multi-page paragraphs and run-on sentences that go for ever -- on the tiny, lo-res screens of a PDA.

      --

      Da Blog
    2. Re:About reading e-books from monitors by naasking · · Score: 2

      So get a PDA with a hi-res screen like the Sony SL-10 (cheap!) or the SJ-20 that I just bought (a little more expensive). Very clean text, very nice.

    3. Re:About reading e-books from monitors by i0lanthe · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure I'd like to try reading some Joyce or Camus, full stop.

      --
      "The Crystal Wind is the Storm, and the Storm is Data, and the Data is Life"
  32. link by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Informative
    The Open Book Project

    It's not much of a collection right now, but the quality level is high. Especially good is 'How to Think Like a Computer Scientist', a good introduction to programming that lives up to the title. It covers several languages.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  33. 350 and growing by cacheMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By getting this story to slashdot, I wonder how many additional books they will find. I don't really understand what the author is saying about open source software never replacing proprietary software and becoming #1 for a particular use. What about apache, perl, and a boatload of other best in class open source software apps?

    1. Re:350 and growing by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      Apache displaced other open-source software. MS's server software came later, after Apache was already established.

      Perl? Well, there was no Perl market before Larry Wall's implementation :-)

      and a boatload of other best in class open source software apps?
      None of which, AFAIK, displaced a preexisting proprietary app that was already the market leader.

  34. Why I'm not big on ebooks by lobos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I like having a physical book. I like being able to make marks on pages, put sticky notes on pages that I can feel on turn to, have the book in my hand, take it where I want to and it never needs electricty.

    Sure, some people may like it. But that's why a free market is so great. You can use what you like. I also learned in a technical writing class that reading from a computer screen is 25% slower than reading from a book. My own experience tells me this is true as well.

    1. Re:Why I'm not big on ebooks by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      I also learned in a technical writing class that reading from a computer screen is 25% slower than reading from a book. My own experience tells me this is true as well.
      This sounds like a fairly person-specific metric. I've clocked myself, and I read faster on a computer screen than I do from a book (about 8.6 words per second on a computer vs. 6.6 on a page). It'd be interesting to see what the distributions are for the general population.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:Why I'm not big on ebooks by lobos · · Score: 1

      The 25% was from a study that was done on the reading speeds. I don't recall any of the details concerning who did it or I would try to find a link or more info.

    3. Re:Why I'm not big on ebooks by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have about 100 linear feet of computer-related books. I also have probably a third of them in some e-format. 9 times out of 10, I find myself consulting the hardcopy, because it's a helluva lot easier to see what I'm trying to do/fix onscreen when there's not an ebook in my way, and because it's a lot easier to flip back and forth between bookmarked items in the hardcopy.

      Tho an ebook is more useful than hardcopy when I'm trying to find some term that's not in the index, or when I need to clip a passage to quote to someone else.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  35. eBooks by ScooterBill · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am totally unsurprised that the non-free eBook market is languishing. The other day I go to Amazon to look for a new book. The hardcover edition was on sale for $18. The digital eBook was $21. This kind of greed (eBooks are arguably less expensive to distribute and have almost no chance of being re-read in a secondary market) is why the established publishers are in for a hard lesson in reality. Same goes with music, etc, etc...

  36. the original and best sources for free books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    usenet (abeb) and irc (bookz)

    read the faq!
    http://ebook.ultraslack.net/

  37. slashdotted by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Assayer appears to be partially slashdotted right now. It's still serving up static HTML, but it won't let you use any of the CGIs, so you can't browse the database, read reviews, sign on as a member, or write reviews right now. That's a shame, since I ended the article with a plea for reviews! I hope people will try back later when the server is able to handle the load. Lots of people have already posted here on Slashdot about their favorite free books, and it would be great if they could put reviews on The Assayer eventually.

    1. Re:slashdotted by bcrowell · · Score: 2

      It seems to be back up now (4:15 pm PST).

  38. Consider the Dover-Gutenberg connection. by dmoynihan · · Score: 5, Informative
    Funny thing, Project Gutenberg, Eric Eldred's site and, oh, other places give away pretty much every public domain Dover reprint that we can get our scanners on. Gutenberg and other sites have shown phenomenal growth in readership... a lot of people are downloading and reading these classic titles.


    So how's that affecting Dover's business (Dover produces no new titles, apart from original translations of non-copyrighted work)? They're booming.

    Heck, with those sort of results, Dover ought to be providing financial support for PG (or at least releasing edited/translated titles into the public domain). Though I guess I'll settle for that nice brief they filed in Eldred's behalf.

    Slight disclaimer here, Dover was bought by a big printing company that's really helped them with distribution (just came back from the beach and all the little bookstores there were well-stocked with Dover thrifts), but every other publisher on the planet has seen sales fall, while Dover's sales, since the acquisition, have grown tremendously.

    1. Re:Consider the Dover-Gutenberg connection. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very TEMPORARY situation. As readers get better/cheaper/more unbiquitous the need for an actual paper book will decline. It only hasn't because you can't buy and cary around a $10 reader that works as well as a book... yet. All book publishers will eventually move to electronic with a real secure system or they WILL go out of buisness. 5 years? 10? 30? who knows, but it will happen.

  39. free books by Anonymous+Butthead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A great place for free book is over at www.andamooka.org
    It has some great books there, although some may be outdated

    --
    Hey, this is my sig, if you don't like it, STOP READING MY POSTS!
  40. Nobody's mention it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because it's like mentioning that water is wet in.. um.. well, any discussion at all.

    Some thing's you're simply assumed to know.

  41. May be over-stating the success by ziriyab · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The free book idea is great, and I don't want to nit-pick (read: "of course means I want to nit-pick and am about to do so"), but there are some problems with the article:

    at least two of [these free books] [4],[5] seem to be the standard textbooks in their field today

    Reference 4 is by no means the standard textbook in the field of biophysics. I've been in the field for at least 6 years and this is the first I've heard of this book. None of my professors have ever mentioned it either.

    Microsoft can't just say, "Romeo and Juliet was a big success for Shakespeare, so we'll write something similar."

    Doesn't this happen all the time? Isn't West Side Story just Romeo and Juliet again? Isn't any star-crossed lover movie that women flock and drag their men to a remake of Romeo and Juliet? Wasn't the Leonardo DiCrapio remake an embraced and extended version of R&J?

    Books, however, are easy to use, and most computer users know how to use an electronic book that is in the ubiquitous (and nonproprietary) Adobe Acrobat format.

    Isn't pdf proprietary?

    Finally, a story on free literature that doesn't link the asstr is not complete by any means :)

    1. Re:May be over-stating the success by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Isn't pdf proprietary?
      No. There are lots of good open-source implementations, including pdftex (a version ot TeX that outputs pdf) and some open-source pdf viewers that run on Linux. The PDF spec is public, and Adobe has never tried to play any games like MS has with the Word format. There are no royalties to pay if you implement PDF in your software.

      It's strange, but PDF always seems to evoke a visceral negative response from Linux folks, whereas they never criticize PostScript, I guess because PS has been around on Unix for a long time. PDF is really nothing but PS with Turing-complete features removed, better compression, and better portability.

    2. Re:May be over-stating the success by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      and I don't want to nit-pick (read: "of course means I want to nit-pick and am about to do so")
      I use that same idiom myself a lot ("I don't want to nitpick, but...") and for me, at least, I think what I'm really saying is, "I don't want to sound like I'm being a whiny nitpicker, but I think there is an important detail/distinction here, etc..."

      It's that there's some minor point which you want to clarify, but you don't want people to think it's insignificant or unimportant. I think, anyway. :)

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:May be over-stating the success by bcrowell · · Score: 1
      Reference 4 is by no means the standard textbook in the field of biophysics.
      My statement about this book and Warren Siegel's Fields was based completely on anecdotal evidence, and may therefore be wrong! Of course, it's possible that while people at your school have never heard of it, people at other schools do consider it the standard text. Remember, there isn't going to be a book rep coming to the professor's door saying, "And of course, On-Line Biophysics Textbook is considered the definitive text. Everyone is using it."

      This brings up an interesting issue, which is how you measure the size of a free book's audience. It's really, really hard to do, especially for books that, like these two, are not being sold in print. If I want to judge how many people are using Halliday as a physics textbook compared to Serway, it's pretty easy to get a general idea. For example, I can look at the sales rankings on amazon.com or Barnes and Noble's web site. But what do you do for a book for which there are no sales figures? I'm sure there's some equation of the form

      • (actual number of readers)=(constant)x(number of downloads)
      The problem is, I have no idea what the proportionality constant is. I'm guessing it's somewhere in the range of 0.0001 to 0.1, but I really don't know.

      While popularity is interesting, it's ultimately less important than quality. Would you be interested in reading the On-Line Biophysics Textbook and writing a review on The Assayer?

  42. Community Writing by vodka2112 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, it's not entirely true that community writing doesn't pan out. The author mentions Nupedia as a failed effort, but there are many examples of places where this kind of "group writing" has worked very well.

    The best I can think of is Everything. I spend many hours reading the stuff there every week. Though it cannot be called an encyclopedia by any stretch of imagination, I've found it to be a very valuable source of general contemporary info.

    Then there's the Encyclopedia Mythica.

    Someone just mentioned Project Gutenberg too. It's a community effort that's coming out very well indeed. I know that it's not not community authorship, but a community effort.

    There are many more counter-examples I can provide. Hell, even the usenet archives are a very useful source of info sometimes.

    Community writing should not be written off (pardon the pun) lightly.

    --
    All those who believe in psychokinesis, raise my hand.
    1. Re:Community Writing by bshanks · · Score: 1
      Quite true. Add to that Wikipedia, the free encylopaedia, and PlanetMath, a similar effort for math.

      Also, wikis in general are group authorship, although most don't aim to produce books. See the Portland Pattern Repository's WikiWikiWeb for an example.

  43. Aren't free books by tkrotchko · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...just like communism?

    (I never know what people mean when they say that...."Free software is just like communism"....what... the workers control the means of production? Die yanqui dogs? I just don't get it)

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  44. What a rip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the title meant that "Under the Radar", Red Hat head honcho Bob Young's book, was now freely downloadable. This excellent tome covers RH's early history, and aside from the alarming moment where Young refers to glibc as a "graphics library", it's well worth reading.

    Anyway, pointless meandering finished. Mod down to the Earth's core!

  45. needs to rewrite accounting for OS X/Darwin by stego · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That chapter is a lot out of date w/ regards to the flexability and openess of Darwin and Mac OS X.

  46. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  47. Free Book Links by FosterSJC · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems to me that most of the free books mentioned on this thread are sci-fi, and popular fiction. It is by virtue of this fact that these dispersion methods for books have not caught on more. The more popular the book, the more likely one is to charge for it. Perhaps we ought to start organizing things in the public domain, and things like classics, technical works, etc, that are more likely to be thought of as "free". Make these books accessible, and create a good interface, to show proof of concept in terms of readers and the bigger guys may come around, at least to publishing on and off-line works (the online versions being free or very cheap). Here are my links to some stellar classics archives. Aside from some of the more obscure math and science works, I believe my whole school's curriculum is available for free on the web:

    Perseus Project

    Great Books Index

    The Internet Classics Archive

    Bartleby

    Enjoy these free reads. They are the greatest books ever written.

  48. Your Western magic words have no meaning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copyright is the figment of a diseased, greed-fevered imagination.

  49. O'Reilly Safari by jpt.d · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Looming on the horizon instead, with every prospect of success, were the "anti-books:" electronic books encumbered with {odious licensing terms} and {restrictive digital rights management technology.[2]} You wouldn't be able to loan such a book to a friend, public libraries couldn't acquire it, and if you stopped paying your rental fee, it would expire and become unreadable! "

    That sounds exactly like Safari (which I am currently a member of). The {} may or may not apply. The only digital rights management there exists is that which will make it very inconvenient to say print the entire book out. I believe Safari is a success and does not include only O'Reilly books. It is a lot cheaper than buying a book, for access to a few.

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
  50. The best of the free I've read... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

    was written by Rick Cook.

    Wizard's Bane, Compiled, and Cursed are all available online.

    They're stories about a normal guy who is transported using magic to a fantasy world where he's the man because he's an excellent programmer.

    Mix of my favorite genre's - fantasy and computers. He brings up TLAs (three letter acronyms), R2D2, the power of caffiene, the dragon book (for compiler writers), a spell called "hello world," emacs, and a lot of other funny stuff I can't remember. And it all seems to fit (not just puns thrown in there for their own sake, like the often-criticized Xanth books).

    Now I REALLY want to go buy the next three. :)

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:The best of the free I've read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope Rick's writing improved after Wizard's Bane. The characters were practically cardboard cutouts, for all the depth they showed (Wiz in particular), and the plot felt equally cartoonish. (The way Wiz f***ed up at Heart's Ease should have impacted the story much more than it eventually did. He got off virtually scot-free!)

      It was kind of interesting, just seeing the whole programmer-turned-magician premise pan out, but if that's the best free book you've read then you need to keep reading.

    2. Re:The best of the free I've read... by Kowh · · Score: 1

      On the link you provided, only the first two books (Bane & Compiled) appear to be available. Is the third (Cursed) available somewhere else? Or perhaps you read it in another form?

    3. Re:The best of the free I've read... by windhaven · · Score: 1

      CURSED should be up at the Baen Free Library. If it isn't by now, nag the webmaster and ask him to nag me. I'm the production mgr., btw. I had sent him the text, and he was supposed to have it up by now. It may be one of those Things To Come Soon.

      --
      *will edit for food*
    4. Re:The best of the free I've read... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

      Cursed is up, sort of...it goes up to chapter 20 (roughly half the book) and you have to look real hard to find it. Is the whole thing supposed to be up there?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    5. Re:The best of the free I've read... by windhaven · · Score: 1

      Hi fireboy -- yeah, the whole thing should be up there eventually. Sometimes the webmaster will put up chapters in chunks ... teasingly. Be patient and all shall be revealed, er, posted.

      --
      *will edit for food*
    6. Re:The best of the free I've read... by Kowh · · Score: 1

      Found Cursed using Google (http://www.baen.com/chapters/W200108/0671318594__ c_.htm). As fireboy said, only up to and including Chapter 20 appear to be there right now. Seeing as how Consulted is the other part of that compilation, when might Consulted be available?

    7. Re:The best of the free I've read... by windhaven · · Score: 1

      Write to the webmaster at the Free Library and bug him about _Consulted_. I sent him the files for it on 9/13, so I know he has them. It's entirely possible that he's waiting to release them on a particular month to fill in the month's supply of free dope^H^H^H^H books.

      --
      *will edit for food*
  51. Free as in irony by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 2, Funny

    did is strike anyone else as ironic that one of the mentioned websites, theassayer.org, which said it had more than 350 free books on it's site, is not accessable by public?

    --
    Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
    1. Re:Free as in irony by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      Try now. It was slashdotted earlier today.

  52. 'Underground' Under the Radar? by bout_time · · Score: 2, Informative

    I found this awhile back by linking back from a Google search. I was pleasantly surprised to a) learn of its existence and b) find it being offered for free. For those of you into tales of hacking/cracking this is a good read that keeps me 'scared whitehat'. http://www.underground-book.com/ It's strange how much is out there out there in terms of free literature and documentation, but the only unified, exhaustive index is Google. :P

    1. Re:'Underground' Under the Radar? by kcurrie · · Score: 1

      This is a great book. I listened to the mp3's of it while driving... caused me to take a few extra sidestreets :-)
      If anybody knows of any other similar free books available, let us know!

      --
      -- I speak only for myself.
  53. That's an interesting question by Theatetus · · Score: 1

    Are any of the Mortimer Adler "great" books not public domain? I wonder if he would think a book could be capital-g "Great" if you could not create derivative works from it.

    (plus, glad to see another Johnny on /.)

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:That's an interesting question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I apologize in advance for being slightly off-topic, and may only be able to join this post tangentially to the original story by relating it to St. John's College. This school is dedicated to the study of great books, again almost all of which are in the public domain, or ought to be.

      Then again, this non-sensical post is an excuse to ask Theatetus: what is your name?

  54. What use are ebooks? by tkrotchko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I understand tech books, but for the types of books you read once...novels, fiction, that sort of thing, the paperback book is a thing of beauty.

    It fits comfortably in hand, requires no power, can be stored in a large pocket or small backpack, and its cheap enough that if it gets lots, you don't care, I can loan it to my friends if I want, I can throw it away, I can store it on a shelf, virtually indestructable, theft resistant and it requires no electricity to use. I can even use it in the hot tub or swimming pool, and it if gets wet, well, when you dry it out, it usually pretty usable. Its perfect packaging for the human animal.

    So if I have a reader for my ebook, I'm getting a fragile device that will have DRM built into it, will require electricity, and will be difficult to read.

    Rather than try to improve one of the perfect human inventions (the paperback book), why not work on something useful like a good, cheap DVD player for linux?

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:What use are ebooks? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It fits comfortably in hand
      As does a pda.

      can be stored in a large pocket or small backpack
      As can a PDA. The difference being I can carry a bookshelf worth of books in my pocket.

      and its cheap enough that if it gets lots, you don't care
      I'll give the advantage there to books on paper as opposed to pda. But if something's valuable to me I'm not going to lose it.

      So if I have a reader for my ebook, I'm getting a fragile device
      I've been carrying around my ipaq in my pocket for about two years now, and it's never gotten so much as a scratch from the wear in a tiny case. While I don't get out as much as I'd like, I'm in woods and parks enough that I'd hardly call it fragile. Heck, it's lasted longer than my rice cooker.

      that will have DRM built into it
      I admit that part I'm not so fond of. While it dosn't make it any more legal, I usually just buy the paperback and download the ebook from a binary group. I wouldn't mind the DRM angle so much, but the publishing of ebooks is so sporatic that I'll often find a series with only a couple books of it in ebook form.

      will require electricity
      Not significant enough to really matter for me at least. I usually get about a seven to ten hour charge if reading under good lighting, and in low or dark light I wouldn't have been able to read it at all. Four rechargeable double A bateries are enough to just about double the time as well for long trips, so all in all it's a slight advantage in my opinion.

      nd will be difficult to read.
      A lot of people have good eyesight :)

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    2. Re:What use are ebooks? by Degrees · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Although you make a good point about the format of the paperback being really easy to use - I have found one thing about my PDA that I prefer: access. I always have my PDA with me. I wear the thing on my belt, so that it is always available. On a business trip, I went through an entire novel with the spare time I had.

      Your points about paperbacks are good - don't get me wrong. It is just that I do not carry a paperback book around with me, (and probably won't) - but I will always have my PDA. And therein lies the rub: even a two minute wait for a bus or a ride is not too short a time to read. I suppose what a person would need to match the convenience of what I have is a belt pouch - paperback size. That would be as handy as my current rig. But some of those paperbacks are pretty thick - and you thought the PDA sized belt pouch looked goofy. ;-)

      The other benefit of the electronic book is freshness. Fresh paper costs money, but downloads are (essentially) free. And as long as people publish in .PDF or .PDB format (or I can point Avantgo at it), I can get material for (almost) free.

      --
      "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
    3. Re:What use are ebooks? by mcubed · · Score: 1
      It fits comfortably in hand
      As does a pda.

      But try falling on your ass with a PDA in your backpocket vs. a book in the same spot.

      can be stored in a large pocket or small backpack
      As can a PDA. The difference being I can carry a bookshelf worth of books in my pocket.

      You must be a really fast reader. I typically find that one book does me nicely for an afternoon at the park. I don't need a shelf's worth. And I have a pretty good idea of how much reading I'll be able to do on trips, although I do sometimes overpack when it comes to books. But considering an essential part of any vacation for me is hunting out local independent and/or used bookstores wherever I go, one thing I never suffer from is a lack of reading material.

      ...etc., etc. Everybody here can go round and round about whether some form or another of ebook is or might soon be somehow preferable to the traditional printed version, but what that ignores is that for many of us (dare I say the majority of readers?) the offline (dare I say real world?) pleasures of books and reading will always be as far away from anything resembling a screen as it's possible to be. I'm no technophobe - I had no qualms about ditching vinyl for CDs, am happy to ditch videos for DVDs, and these days I spend as much or more time reading material on screen as I do reading anything on paper - but I will never surrender the 'analog' pleasure of curling up with a good printed book and losing myself in the experience without being distracted by anything more complex than turning the paper page with my fingers. Nor will any literary website - however thoughtfully organized, with whatever bells & whistles - ever equal the experience of browsing through the stacks and bins and shelves of a really good bookstore. These are as much about the owners' and staffs' and locations' idiosyncracies as they are about commerce. You can learn a lot about a town or area by visiting its indie bookstores, particularly if it stocks a mix of new and used titles. Many are also about community, not the virtual kind, but the real face-to-face, get-to-know-your-neighbors kind. Gay bookstores, women's bookstores, genre bookstores function to bring like-minded people together in real time. Cyber meeting places for kindred spirits have value, certainly, but not as a replacement for geographic community involvement. Maybe /.'ers don't agree, but for my money, there are some things software, hardware, and the Internet can't replace.

      Michael

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    4. Re:What use are ebooks? by mikeplokta · · Score: 2

      Paperbacks are far from perfect. They're extremely bulky (I can fit over a hundred novels on a PDA that is much smaller than a single paperback of a short novel), they're not waterproof, they need two hands to read in anything approaching comfort, it's difficult and time-consuming to copy the data, and they're not searchable.

    5. Re:What use are ebooks? by nica · · Score: 1

      Books seems so perfect to us because we have had our whole lives to get used to their problems.

      Books are bulky, heavy, often have print that is too small for our aging population. Paperbacks don't stay open, so I can't eat my lunch with both hands and read at the same time. A large collection of books can be difficult to organize, and can rapidly fill lots of space.

      There are problems with e-books, some of which I don't know what the answer will be. But consider what many people must have thought about the automobile..."too expensive, stinky, dangerous, and who is going to believe there is going to be a whole petroleum distribution network? You'll be out of gas, and need to drill for petrol where you are! Mankind has been using horses for centuries. They can live off the land. I don't need a mechanic with me. They can reproduce! Why the hell should put-put around on a stinking machine?"

      It took decades for the family car to catch on. Give the e-book some time to catch up with the paper book.

  55. Re:group-authorship.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Along the same lines, check out Wikipedia, a free online encyclopedia that can be edited by anyone. Information wants to be free; hopefully this is one small step towards that goal.

  56. Going somewhere. Not far, but not nowhere. by The_Guv'na · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Free books are a good idea, but will face the same struggle as OSS, primarily because of the monopolies already existing. MS we all know about, but how many of you good people here tonight know the extent of the Bertelsmann firm's media dominance? It's the only Big Six corp not to have a key US TV outlet, and that (AFAIK) is because the US has laws to make sure all US TV is by American corporations, and Bertelsmann is German.

    To cut a long story short, the Big Corps will do anything and everything to wipe out "free books", or at the very least, prevent their gaining a significant market share. In terms of styles of books, the mass markets will be catered for, so free books will fill the unprofitable/undesirable topics that publishers will not touch. They will also be quite a few people releasing books for free as a statement, like the morons who struggle to use Linux just because its "cool", aparrently. Finally, the genuineley intelligent books whose authors really are in it for the spirit of it, the virtually unread minority, drowned under the crapflooders whose crap has no profit for the big publishing houses and no worth to the independent publishers.

    In short, this could, and hopefully will, be a force for good in the literature arena. Until the lawyers move in...

    Ali

  57. Free books might mean more money for small writers by CathedralRulz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hi,

    I have known authors of niche type books and have learned from them that they make exceptionally small amounts of money on the sale of these books. Specifically, I am talking about the PhD candidate who turns his thesis over to a publisher. Here's an example of this: The Rise of Neoconservatism: Intellectuals and Foreign Affairs, 1945-1994. This was a book written by my professor.

    Getting back to my point, though, I believe that he would probably make more money today posting that entire book on the web for free and putting up a paypal tip jar than he would by going through a publisher or attempting subsidy publishing.

    There are a lot of content sites out there using this method and, when you cut out the agent, the publisher, the printer, the retailer, and all the other middlemen, direct sales based on paypal type donations might be the way to go (please spare me on the evils of paypal, you know I mean the concept of micropayments.)

  58. Oh yeah, and... by The_Guv'na · · Score: 1

    ... did anyone else read "At the height of the dot-com bubble, twenty-somethings with goatees" as "At the height of the dot-com bubble, twenty-somethings with goatses"? No? OK, I need to cut out some slashdot from my diet.

    Ali

  59. free classics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    This site: DjVu Editions has lots of classics as free, nicely typeset e-books (shakespeare, blake, carroll, dickens, dafoe, eliott, thoreau.....).

    The books are in DjVu format (viewer for Linux available here).

  60. ebooks -- been reading them for years now by jimfrost · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I wonder if a lot of the problem with ebooks as a profit zone wasn't largely the result of the ebook initiative people of giving you basically two ebook alternatives:

    1. Go buy this $300+ ebook reader, plus pay them premium prices, in order to read them.

    2. Read them on your personal computer.

    I dunno about the rest of you, but I wasn't going to buy a rocketbook or any of the others so that I could pay a bunch of money to download books over a slow-as-molasses modem. Why the heck can't I download them over my broadband connection to my PC and maintain my own library? And I wasn't going to buy books that I could only read on my PC, which I don't happen to be sitting in front of at any time when I want to be reading books.

    I want to read books wherever I am, like you'd be able to do with a dedicated ebook reader, but I don't want to pay for or carry around a dedicated ebook reader.

    As it turns out, I've been carrying a portable computer since early 1997 - a palm. So why not use that? The screen is small, but I always have it with me, and its print is really not all that much smaller than a lot of paperbacks anyway.

    I thought that was a natural fit. I started reading ebooks on it in I think 1998, but certainly by the end of 1999. Back then there were only a few places you could get them, and peanutpress was the only place I could get contemporary stuff from well-known authors (plus the peanut reader did a very nice display job given the limitations of the device).

    Since that time the number of ebook vendors has exploded. I still can't get them from Barnes and Noble or Amazon in a palm reader format (isn't it interesting that both support Microsoft's format but neither supports the much more popular palm reader format) but there has been an explosion of free and commercial ebook services serving the palmtop market. My current favorite is fictionwise.

    Anyway, my point in all of this is that ebooks are selling commercially and have been selling for years. Not on high volumes, but I wonder if that's not because of the failure of the large booksellers to target the largest of the palmtop markets. The smaller vendors have existed for years and are obviously doing something right given that they're still around and their inventories are exploding, but they don't have the marketing push to really get ebooks out there.

    Whatever, ebooks really are here if you want them and most likely you don't have to buy anything extra to read them.

    --
    jim frost
    jimf@frostbytes.com
  61. Ebooks rule! (at least for research) by EnlightenmentFan · · Score: 3, Informative
    I love dead-tree books, but when you are looking for something--if you have even a vague idea what it is, you can't beat a computer.

    For example, I wanted to quote that great pseudo-riddle from Lewis Carroll -- "Why is a raven like a writing desk?" But which Alice book did it come from? In two minutes I found both text files at Gutenberg, searched for "raven", and there it was. (The Mad Hatter came up with it, in _Alice in Wonderland_. )

    The Internet is, IMO, the best free ebook--it sure is the biggest. Unlike dead tree books, you get a wide choice of search engines. Of course, you can pick up a lot of weird stuff there too. So, surf safely--I myself always wear a condom.

    --
    Making trouble today for a better tomorrow...
  62. It's just 'cause they're too big by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to move your head and eyes around too much.

    I wouldn't mind reading a book on a PDA though. It's a little small but I don't think that would bother me too much.

    Somebody needs to build a version of a PDA that's more comfortable for reading. It would be too big to carry around like today's PDAs but you would leave it at the house and use it for misc stuff. Kinda like the star trek PADs (personal access device I think it stands for). A large thin PDA with touch screen buttons large enough to use your finger. That woud be cool. And if it had built in wireless networking it would rock. I would buy 2. :)

  63. Screw E-Books. I have a better idea. by josh+crawley · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We all know there is "book warez" out there, along with hacked versions or ebook readers. Still, instead of filling the greedy with money, we ought to look at a richer source of information: Gutenberg Library.

    They don't use .lockout formats. They use text with a copyright warning at the beginning. The are truley free. The library may be quite old though...

    Still I've got this idea talking about this. Gutenberg has "how many documents?"... Add the amount of space (uncompressed) to a database like MySql along with a web interface. Also have some way of grepping text inside all those files. Slap it al together using Linux, and you now have a "Library Server". That one server could be put under a desk or wherever and have web interfaces to it. Even the medium-small librarys could legitly quadruple thier colllections fo books, wether it be dead tree or electronic.

    Thinking of that, I just might do that..... I bet the library would pay a bif for the setup like that. Get a decent machine like a 1.4 Athlon with 1 gig of ram. Depending on the load, you might be able to store everything Gzipped.

    Just a thought from a crazy ;-)

  64. Sonny Bono killed Project Gutenberg by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Funny that no one has mentionned Project Gutenberg so far.

    Project Gutenberg, unfortunately, has had its hands tied by the late Sen. Sonny "Watch out for that tree" Bono.

    Or are you so sure that Eldred will win?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Sonny Bono killed Project Gutenberg by ahfoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, but did you check that Lessig presntation to the Supreme Court the other day? Apparently Justice O'Conner thinks that Lessig is right that the Bono act was unconstitutional and several of the justices are concerned that the the earlier extension may also have been unconstitutional. We could be looking at everything before '83 on the net free for download.

    2. Re:Sonny Bono killed Project Gutenberg by BigJimSlade · · Score: 2

      "Project Gutenberg is dead." -- Sonny Bono

      "Sonny Bono is dead." -- Project Gutenberg

  65. Are music and video different than books? by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Clearly the grandparent comment is claiming they are the same in this respect. The parent thinks that enough people will put up with it to make lots of money for the current industry players. They are different in that the digital copy can be just as usable as the original, in some cases identical.

    I claim DRM will fail for similar reasons to 'anti-books' as they are called. If what they do (with DRM) to a CD or DVD to make it uncopyable, and usable on exactly one computer also makes it less usable on standard audio and video hardware, I think they could lose it all very quickly. As long as the average consumer can use the media he bought in any number of players (including old ones), they have a chance of selling them. But if DRM means you lose the right of first sale property, which includes the right to lend the media to a friend and such, the average joe will quickly reject this junk.

    There is also a growing number of people that won't buy it unless they retain basic fair use copying rights. I'm one of them, as are a lot of people on slashdot. I don't have any MP3 or Ogg devices yet, but I'm likely to convert my entire music collection to this type of system in the next five years (give or take). I'm quite confident that there will be enough material that doesn't have these ridiculous restrictions that I won't feel I'm missing anything, and frankly if an artist lets their work get released in this way, I don't need them.

    1. Re:Are music and video different than books? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Mightywords used a sort of DRM in that you had to log onto their server to get a purchased ebook unlocked for reading. You may notice that mightywords is no longer with us.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  66. Flaws of society by ViZA · · Score: 2, Funny

    It is times like these that I rejoice to the sounds of failure. Corporations and your typical money making "joe" make it hard these days to separate superficial monkey bait from superb works of literary merit. Much like this man.

  67. I agree. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    That is why the market hasn't taken off.

    But... it's close.

    I use Windows XP on my Toshiba Satelite 5100...

    1600x1200, with windows set to 120dpi and Cleartype properly tuned... and the fonts look absolutely gorgeous. Extremely fine detail.. it's almost like looking at print.

  68. Fanfic. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2

    Fanfic is borderline-legal, but is almost always written by the most hardcore fans of the (show|books|comics)---no creator is going to alienate their biggest fans. Legal action has only been undertaken when the fic's author sought to profit from their use of the copyrighted universe---in this way, all fic works must be de facto free. Nifty, eh?

    See The X-Files, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Star Trek and so on for examples.

    Actually, I'll start you off with my favorite Buffy the Vampire Slayer fic. (Sex and violence the way it should be!) Read [skin]. Googling for "fanfic" and the name of your favorite series should produce good results. Most of it is dreck, but there's a lot of good stuff in there too.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. They do get it, they have a different agenda by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Particularly the RIAA, as featured in a recent slashdot posting, is using piracy as a smokescreen to keep the barriers to entry high because they make more money on million sellers.

    For the MPAA, I think it is different as the barriers to entry are pretty high for motion pictures. They don't like their own DVD products cutting into theature box office, so maybe they really are more concerned with piracy. At current bandwidth, I'd be surprised if P2P style exchanges are really that big of a problem for them, but mass produced grey market sales of actual discs probably is. They should be able to attack this problem without pissing off customers with restrictive DRM, but they seem to be heading down the wrong path.

  71. Problem w/ reading books pdf format by dh003i · · Score: 3, Informative

    Is that you're computer screen has very crappy resolution compared to the resolution on a piece of paper. When computer screen's are 300dpi like decent printers, then reading stuff on them will be much more fun.

    Until then, the thing to do is offer books in pdf and html format. PDF to print out. HTML to read on the computer, which will allow you to change font settings and sizes to your preference, making it easier to read.

  72. We used to have that... by MenTaLguY · · Score: 2

    It was called a culture's mythology.

    I guess we still have it in a way, but it's all been fenced in.

    --

    DNA just wants to be free...
  73. Why not a laser printer? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Laser printers a cheaper per page than an inkjet, by far.

    1. Re:Why not a laser printer? by shepd · · Score: 1

      But neither of those are anywhere near as cheap as a dot matrix or daisywheel printer.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  74. Re:Sad news ... Stephen King dead at 55 by Stephen+King · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not.

    --
    Karma: Undead.
  75. No e-books, no divx by dh003i · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a similar set of reasons as to why the public rejected the divx "loaning scheme" for movies, they'll reject e-books as they currently stand.

    People would always rather get something for free than have to pay for it; and they'd always rather have the rights laid out according to the FSF than not have those rights.

    But people will pay for books. We've been doing that forever, since the beginning of this nation. But when people pay for books, they expect certain rights; the right to read as often as they like, to loan, to mark-up, to give away, to take quotes from, to put in a library, etc. Until e-books give people all the same rights they have with regular paper-back books, they will not catch on.

    Asking people to buy e-books as they currently exist is like saying "why don't you pay me 30,000 dollars for the same Ford except that you can't loan it to anyone, modify it, etc etc". People aren't going to buy into this bullshit.

    What should happen is that when we buy a paper-back book, we should get access to an e-book automatically, and have the same rights to utilize the e-book as we would the paper-back book.

    The reason why free-books online are catching on is because they offer the consumers all the same rights they'd have with paper-back books.

    1. Re:No e-books, no divx by jimfrost · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But when people pay for books, they expect certain rights; the right to read as often as they like, to loan, to mark-up, to give away, to take quotes from, to put in a library, etc. Until e-books give people all the same rights they have with regular paper-back books, they will not catch on.

      Asking people to buy e-books as they currently exist is like saying "why don't you pay me 30,000 dollars for the same Ford except that you can't loan it to anyone, modify it, etc etc". People aren't going to buy into this bullshit.

      It's not so much that I can't lend them; the Palm Reader format that I most often get books in uses a credit card to unlock the book. I can give it away, but I have to either type in or give away the credit card with it. That immediately restricts the number of copies that will get made, and of course if the thing gets massively given away they can track it back to me. This is a pretty effective and simple means of DRM, and yet it does give me much of the flexibility of paper in terms of lending.

      I don't mind that at all.

      What I mind is when they charge me $20 for a contemporary novel, same price as the hardcover book, and all I'm getting is bits. That drives me nuts. I think if they're not going to have to pay to print and ship it, I ought to benefit from the distribution cost savings.

      There are some good arguments as to why that won't make them really cheap (much of the cost of producing most books is in the preprint production) but if you're offering in both formats there should be a discount for ebooks. On the other hand, I'm obviously an early adopter and there is infrastructure to pay for.

      I find that these days it's likely that a title bought in ebook format will indeed be a couple of bucks less money than a paper one, and shipping is free. Unfortunately availability of new titles is still very limited, although vastly better now than even one year ago.

      Ebooks are happening, even commercial ebooks, even though they are not yet mainstream. They still have their limitations relative to paper, but the convenience of the format (I regularly carry three or more in my PDA, whereas you'd be lucky to find me with even one paper book) is worth quite a bit. No more reading the National Enquirer in checkout lines.

      --
      jim frost
      jimf@frostbytes.com
  76. No takers is not the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Your photos are horrible (click to view tips about travel photography here)
    2) Your "photos" should be called "thumbnails"
    3) You have obviously not taken even one of the Photo Workshops advertised on your site, and people don't like to be around hypocrites

  77. He claims it doesn't work by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
    Using the Cathedral and Bazaar model, he claims that only Cathedral model has been working well for free books, or books in general. I think it may be too early to decide this yet.

    There has been some experimentation with collaborative fiction, but I suspect it is rare that it gains any traction. The example in the sibling comment of 'fanfic' is probably most workable because there is an existing 'created world' to establish a framework and characters, etc. I would say this type of thing is completely different and has different motivations than what drives authors to create original fiction. Software is naturally a more collaborative process. Design in general is; maybe it is that complexity requires many minds.

  78. If only amazon would use this definition by nizo · · Score: 2

    The surprise success story is free books." Of course, this defines "success" as number of readers, not in terms of monetary profits.
    I wish amazon defined success this way, then I would only have to pay shipping to support my crack-like book collecting habit (at least until amazon went out of business).

  79. Where to get lots of free books... by nelziq · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As an avid reader I have been getting free books for years... from the public library. Seriously, there are plenty of good books to be found there and it wont cost you a penny. And for the newer stuff I can always drop in to barnes and nobles and either return it or make a nice library donation and write it off in taxes.

  80. Liner notes? Commentary tracks? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Even with CD's which yield perfect copies so easily, you still get more than just the music in a high quality format - you get the liner notes (often with lyrics or cool art) and in any case support the artist.

    And with movies, sure you can download a divx but then you miss out on a lot of extra stuff that makes DVD's so great. Even if you download a straight rip of a DVD you probably are not getting the extra discs, as why would anyone put them up? I think extra DVD's are a great way to combat piracy, they more discs thre are the less likley all of them will be availiable for DL and thus if you really like the movie you'll probably buy the DVD.

    Even with downloading copies of things, DVD and CD sales are still great so obviosuly people see some value in the physical medium.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  81. One size fits...? by gidds · · Score: 1
    I'm a little concerned by the number of posters saying they much prefer dead-tree editions. Not because there's anything wrong with that, but by the implication that no-one else should or could prefer them either, or that there's therefore no market for them, or even that they're worried ebooks will swiftly lead to the elimination of dead-tree editions altogether.

    Clearly, none of these are true. Many people like to read ebooks; I'm one. Enough people are buying them to keep sites like Fictionwise going. And yet dead-tree books aren't going away; each format has its own advantages and disadvantages - the important thing is for people to have the choice.

    Personally, I much prefer an (open) electronic format. I can keep a library on my palmtop, taking up no extra physical space at all, and have access to reading matter and reference material whether at home, in my lunch hour, on the train, on holiday, or wherever. I can search, cut-and-paste quotations, and easily use long-term bookmarks. Plus I can edit the text as necessary (for example, I've developed a program to Anglicise US spellings, which really annoy me - try that with a dead-tree edition!) My library's about ½GB, mostly compressed.

    Of course, I'm in a minority; many folks find palmtop screens or even monitors inappropriate for that sort of reading. And that's fine. But I hope they'll appreciate that some others find them useful.

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  82. Ellen on E-books.... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 2
    Or maybe we'll see a Apple Switch Ad that features E-Books...

    I was reading an E-Book on the PC and it was like beeeeep beep beep beep beep beeeep! And then like half of my book was gone, and I was like unnnhhh...? It devoured my book.

    It was a really good book.

    And then I had to download it again and I had to do it fast so it wasn't as good.

    It's kind of...

    a bummer.

    Note to moderators: It's Funny, not off-topic.

  83. bollocks by perky · · Score: 2

    Two years ago, the idea of a free book --- a book whose author had intentionally made it free on the internet --- was largely unknown and untested.
    My arse it was largely unknown and untested. If that's your first sentence I'm not going to bother read the rest. BTW, Bruce Eckel has an interesting note about this at http://www.mindview.net/Etc/FAQ.html#BooksOnWeb

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  84. Bizaar at one level, Cathedral at another by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Raymond described a model of collaborative software development in which a large, geographically dispersed group of programmers worked together in a seemingly chaotic way. This bazaar model was to be contrasted with the cathedral model, in which everything is done according to a detailed, preexisting plan.

    [...]

    The bazaar model seems to have been almost a complete failure in the world of free books, although not for want of trying. Tellingly, The Cathedral and the Bazaar was itself written cathedral-style by Raymond. He has also started a bazaar-style book project, The Art of Unix Programming[7], which appears to be languishing.

    [...]

    The failure of the bazaar model with free books might not seem surprising


    This depends largely on where one draws the line between bizzar and cathedral, or put another way, with what granularity one considers a project or body of work. The Star Trek and Star Wars universes are examples where there is a large body of Cathedralesque work, as well as an even larger body of "fan fiction." While many stories (perhaps most) are themselves written by a single author (as, in fact, my own (soon-to-be released under a free license) novel has been), the overall, net effect of the body of work which comprises the fan fiction of the Star Trek and Star Wars universes (and undoubtably other settings as well) is in many ways more remeniscent of the Bizzar than a Cathedral approach. The Linux kernel is a bizzar-type project, yet within that kernel are modules and subsystems that are quite 'cathedralesque' in how they were managed and written.

    The definition in many ways becomeds one of granularity, and while I agree with much the article writes, I think the author overlooks the bizzar aspect of the cultural commons from which all authors draw inspiration. This is readilly seen in the collections of fan fiction which abound and, were it not for the often extremely repressive aspects of copyright in limiting how and when a person can incorporate another's work in their own project (no, I'm not advocating plagerism, I'm advocating broader definitions of fair use that including giving the original creator credit for their contribution, if not exclusive use).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  85. As an e-book and dead tree author... by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...I've spent a lot of time thinking about these issues. I'll be releasing an e-book novel in the next few weeks, so I've had to think about how I want to publish and why.

    In recent years, I've fed my kids through the work I attract via my contributions to open source and the publication of free software on my web site. It is possible to make a living from free software.

    I hope to use a similar model for a fantasy novel I'm writing.

    The novel in question was first completed some years back, tentatively sold to a big name publisher, and then "lost" in a series of mergers. Quite discouraging. Writing is a damned tough business; I know, because I made a living for twelve years with magazine columns and programming books.

    I write fiction for two reasons -- because I enjoy it, and to entertain people. But getting into the fiction market (as in making money) is very, very hard. The publishing industry is terribly conservative and biased in the most incredible ways.

    Success as a writer -- especially as a fiction writer -- is elusive. Lost in a sea of lousy over-the-transom manuscripts, agents, and myopic publishers, how does an author stand out and make themselves known?

    Well, I'm told that John Grisham started his career by self-publishing his first books, and selling them from the trunk of his car at fairs and flea markets. Self-promotion is the root of all success...

    ....which leads back to free software. Giving away a program may induce someone to hire me to write code -- and giving away a book may draw attention to my work, thus attracting a real publisher who may pay me for other works.

    And perhaps people will pay me directly, if they believe my book worthy.

    So I'm publishing a book in a few weeks via my website, complete with full-color plates (artwork by my talented wife), and a story written exactly the way I want it, without the interference (or grammatical safety net!) of an editor. The complete book will be available under exactly the same terms as a paper book -- you can give it away, make copies for your friends, or print it out, all without paying me a dime.

    BUT, I'll also have a honor-based online payment system; for less than the cost of a typical paperback, people who enjoy the book can pay for it. They are not required to pay me -- it is a matter of honor and ethics.

    I don't expect most people to pay for what they download; if they simply enjoy the book, pass it on to friends, read it to their kids -- that will be victory (in a different sense.) What I'm giving people is an honest chance to compensate me, the author, for my work, if they deem it worthy.

    How many times have you bought a paperback, found it unreadable, and put it on the shelf unfinished or dissatisfied? How often does a pretty cover conceal a lousy book? It happens often enough for me, especially when buying a new science fiction or fantasy book. Wouldn't it be better if you could read the book first, and then only pay the authors whose work you considered worthy?

    Perhaps I'm too optimistic about people; if nothing else, this will be an interesting experiment in publishing and human relations.

  86. Mailing list? by pete-classic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the things I have always appreciated about the Free Software community is the way help of all kinds is given (to those seen as deserving!) freely.

    My perception of the way books are normally written is very close to my perception of how proprietary software is developed. In secret, with help only from those with a financial interest in the book.

    I'm in the process of writing my first book, which I intend to distribute under the FDL.

    So, my actual question is, does anybody know of a mailing list or other "support group" for (aspiring) Free Book authors?

    -Peter

  87. Blackmask.com by Brother+Fjordhr · · Score: 1

    Another great one is http://www.blackmask.com he has a lot of great stuff in a variety of formats so that you do not have to format it to your reader to use it.

    I have a Sony Clie with about twenty ebooks on it right now. I use it to read daily. The narrow screen is actual better than dead trees for reading fast because there is less need to move the eyes side to side, just up and down. With the back light I am able to read in bed at night without bothering my wife (and that is a big plus because she has to get up about two hours before I do).

    In general it is a great device if you like to read. But, with the law purchased by Disney Corp. there is less Public Domain stuff than there should be.

  88. Interesting problem... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Informative
    Ya know, Microsoft's new ClearType font smoothing was largely created to make reading ebook content more pleasant, by supposedly giving a 2-3 times greater effective resolution for text rendering on LCD screens, making the experience of reading on an LCD closer to that of reading on paper.


    The problem is that though ClearType looks great subjectively it gives me a massive headache on my 17" ViewSonic VA800 LCD screen if I leave it on for a day or two of heavy computer use, even after I "tuned" it. I haven't set it up on a PDA and tried reading a Gutentext or other ebook because of that (well, and cuz I got rid of my PocketPC device and am back to a Clie for now... doh).


    Luckily there are still some immediate options if you are one of the many who *know* about Project Gutenberg etexts (for those of us whose taste in books, e- and otherwise is somewhat antiquated) but have never actually *read* one due to their well, umm, rather plain text look and feel. In particular GutenMark should do the trick. So download a couple of GutenTexts and GutenMark them into PDF/PS and you have something you might not exactly be able to curl up with, but at least it's readable.

    1. Re:Interesting problem... by ProfessorPuke · · Score: 1
      "Microsoft's new ClearType font smoothing"


      Excuse me?? Nothing that was invented before Microsoft was even founded can qualify as new.

    2. Re:Interesting problem... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2

      Sigh, I was by no means trying to imply that there was anything particularly innovative about ClearType - subpixel rendering, as you mention, has been around for years apparently. Obviously, OS X beat them to putting it in a consumer OS. But the point is that the thing called "ClearType" is MS's specific implementation of sub-pixel rendering, so when I say "Microsoft's new ClearType font smoothing" I simply mean to imply that I enabled an option after installing Windows XP that had never been there in earlier versions of Windows and that had strange unintended health consequences for myself.

  89. It's just sad by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

    I mean, it would be possible for eBooks to be available for most current books you see out there in the stores... if it weren't for the pirates who don't respect the authors' rights to earn a profit on their works. All the trees being chopped because leeches are unwilling to spend a few bucks to read a book that it took someone months or years to write.

    Argue all you want regarding the merits of intelletual property rights... but the fact is, not many authors who write for a living would, in their right minds, would ever release a book complete in eBook form just so crackers can put it on Kazaa for everybody to download.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  90. Recent Interface Upgrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Safari service just got an upgrade about 2 or 3 weeks ago. Its leaps and bounds better than the previous incarnation.

    1. Re:Recent Interface Upgrade by Lando · · Score: 2

      Nod, I've been looking through it but haven't made a detailed study of the new interface...

      Thanks for bringing this point up, it's well worth mentioning.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  91. Tablet PCs might do the trick by caudor · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at the tablet PCs that are supposed to hit the scene around Nov 7th. To me, these seem like they would be perfect (in portrait mode) for deep reading.

    My only hope is that we may someday be able to get tablets PCs with something other than WinXP Tablet edition.

    Anyone hear any rumors of a MAC or other non-MS tablet PC offering on the horizon?

  92. Free books from the past! by dclatfel · · Score: 1

    One of my favorite e-libraries is The Gutenberg Project which houses thousands of pieces of classic literature.

    And if I can make a shameless plug, the following is the address of a mailing list based bookclub that aims to read one Gutenberg text a month:
    iBookclub

    --
    Share data. Share code. Share ideas. Share the wealth.
    http://stockfilter.org
  93. Ergomics by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2
    I've read several eBooks, mostly ones for Microsoft Reader running on my iPaq. (Mostly old titles, classic novels; I think MS releases them because the copyright has expired. They're nobody's bitch.)

    Anyhow, reading on the iPaq is very pleasant in many ways; nice screen contrast, high quality ClearType fonts, ability to look up works in the dictionary easily, and so forth. However, it can be physically fatiquing on the hands, because of the need to push the button to change pages. The requires a relatively large amount of force, in a fairly awkward manner, as compared to reaching over your other hand, and flipping a thin piece of paper. And because each virtual page holds less, you do it more.

    I think that once some of the more subtle ergonmic issues are taken care of, the selection of titles is greater, and Pocket PC-style devices are much cheaper (Palm devices still aren't up to the quality of MS Reader), you'll see it become a far more common and preferred way to read.

    Nothing beats carrying a dozen virtual books around with you, in addition to your calendar, todo list, some games, and so on. Makes waiting in long lines, waiting at the doctor, far less annoying.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  94. Baen's Honorverse Disc by svzurich · · Score: 1

    Don't for their Honorverse Disc CD-Rom included with the hardcover "War of Honor". It has 22+ novels (including all 13 of the Honor Harrington ones) and all of which are unencrypted in multiple formats. This is perfect for loading the old ones on my Ipaq, and introducing someone to the series!

    Yes, you can get some in the free library, but they have gone out of their way to make this CD and nice thank you for those who buy "War of Honor". Very cool!

    http://www.baen.com/orientation.htm

    1. Re:Baen's Honorverse Disc by svzurich · · Score: 1

      Just got the book and the CD is loaded! The books support HTML, MS Reader, Mobipocket, Rocket
      RCA REB1100, and RTF! Here are the contents on the disk, and remember they are all unencrypted and free with "War of Honor".

      David Weber
      "On Basilisk Station"; "The Honor of the Queen"; "The Short Victorious War"; "Field of Dishonor"; "Flag in Exile"; "Honor Among Enemies"; "In Enemy Hands"; "Echoes of Honor"; "Ashes of Victory"; "War of Honor" (the novel it comes in); "More Than Honor"; "Worlds of Honor"; and "Changer of Worlds"

      David Drake
      "With the Lightnings"; "Lt. Leary, Commanding"; "An Oblique Approach"; "In the Heart of Darkness"; "Destiny's Shield"; "Fortune's Stroke"; "The Tide of Victory"

      Eric Flint
      "1632"; "1633"; "An Oblique Approach"; "In the Heart of Darkness"; "Destiny's Shield"; "Fortune's Stroke"; "The Tide of Victory"; "Rats, Bats and Vats"; and "The Shadow of the Lion"

      Dave Freer
      "Rats, Bats and Vats" and "The Shadow of the Lion"

      Mercedes Lackey
      "The Shadow of the Lion"

      Keith Laumer
      "Retief!"

      Larry Niven
      "Fallen Angels"

      Jerry Pournelle
      "Fallen Angels" and "The Prince"

      John Ringo
      "A Hymn Before Battle"; "Gust Front"; "When the Devil Dances"; "March Upcountry"; "March to the Sea"; and "March to the Stars"

      James H. Schmitz
      "Telzey Amberdon"; "TnT: Telzey and Trigger"; "Trigger and Friends"; "The Hub"; and "Agent of Vega"

      There is also an art gallery, audio book samples, and filk music by Echo's Children. I can't recommend "War of Honor" enough, and this CD is a real treat!

  95. The biggest problem with books on computers is... by Joey7F · · Score: 1

    that you can't take your monitor to the can with you...yet ;)

    --Joey

  96. Ahem. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

    Have you read any sword and sorcery books? The characters are SUPPOSED to be cardboard cutouts. That's the genre. And I wouldn't have it any other way. Its not a romance novel - its the literary equivalent of a Conan movie (or Conan book, for that matter). You know - something that should be consumable by someone with a sixth grade reading level and with a plot which is merely a twist around a single (sometimes two, if they really push it) major idea.

    I was overjoyed to find a book in this genre that could actually appeal to programmers.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  97. Some inaccuracies and overstatements by mcubed · · Score: 1
    The anti-book has been an abject failure. What seems to be succeeding instead is the copylefted book.... So at least in some cases, free books have displaced unfree ones in the marketplace."

    This is really comparing apples and oranges. The "anti-book" is a product no one wants, at least not yet. The free book isn't a product at all - from a commercial perspective, it's a promotional tool at most. How can the latter possibly be said to have "displaced" the former? The anti-book, so far, is just another Edsel or Betamax. The fact that people are interested in downloading a free book they can read on a PC or PDA doesn't have much bearing on the fact that they aren't willing to spend $300 on a Rocketbook.

    Remember a few years ago when they were predicting that print-on-demand publishing would be the wave of the future? You were supposed to be able to go to your local Borders or Barnes and Noble, ask for an obscure book on medieval Bulgaria, and have it printed and bound while you sipped a $5 cappucino. It didn't happen,...

    Correction: it hasn't happened...yet. Print-on-demand technology is still developing and still being invested in by publishers and distributors, mainly as a way to reduce inventory. Whether it will develop to the point fantasized about in the article is anyone's guess, but that's hardly the value of the technology to the publishing industry; and if it doesn't, that's certainly no indication that it's a failure. When a store places a 10-copy order to a publisher, if that publisher can print & bind & ship those 10 copies in one day, then POD will be a huge success and will greatly lower publishers' cost of doing business. That's what they're working toward, and it looks like they will get there.

    Self-publishing a book is much more difficult than self-publishing a program, and print publishing is a capital-intensive business. Nearly all authors need to work with a publishing house if they want to see their books in print. In most cases, the book contract gives the copyright to the publisher.

    POD technology has made self-publishing easier than ever. Companies like POD publisher Exlibris (in which Barnes & Noble has a stake) are replacing the role of the old-style vanity presses. They make it relatively cheap for anyone to have available a printed & bound copy of his masterpiece. The only trick for the author is to create demand. Even authors with track records at major publishers have gone this route for certain projects they want to handle themselves. It's precisely that "capital intensive" quality of publishing that POD technology has already taken a bite out of, and will take a bigger bite out of in the future.

    And the article incorrectly claims that authors sign away their copyrights when they contract with publishers. This is only true of books that are "work-for-hire," when the publisher hires writers to do a specific project that the publisher has conceived. The vast majority of books published are not work-for-hire, and almost all trade fiction and non-fiction is copyrighted by the author, not the publisher.

    We still need intelligent, qualified people to help us sift the wheat from the chaff, but when it comes to free books, the judgment of quality can come after publication, not before. This is a wonderful thing!

    The only judgment of quality that matters comes after a book is published, no matter whether it's free or published by a corporate publisher or small press. The single biggest factor in determining a book's success is word-of-mouth. The biggest ad campaign in history won't get people reading something they aren't interested in, no matter how low the price. Yes, this is a wonderful thing. But it's as true for corporate publishing as it is for free books online.

    Michael
    --
    "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
  98. everything2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will anyone buy the annual everything2 encyclopedia ????

  99. Audio Books by Jus+ad+Bellum · · Score: 1

    As I was doing another 5 hour drive this weekend I thought to myself, "Self, why is it so hard to get books on CD's. It would seem like the logical progression, use CD's instead of crappy tapes that will work in my CD player on long drives when I can't read. Why are there always books-on-tape at gas stations but never any books-on-CD's....." This conversation went on in my mind for most of my drive.


    Now I am curious. Is there a pocket PC/PDA that has an audio out jack, and can have a text->audio converter installed onto it??? I admit that I would be highly interested in one....

    1. Re:Audio Books by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Step one: go to audible.com and get books.

      Step two: get one of those little thingies that plugs into the headphone out, and transmits on a radio frequency.

      Step three: profit!!

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  100. Project Gutenberg by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

    When I mirrored Project Gutenberg, I litterally gave away thousands of books, mostly to eastern Europe. I don't have exact numbers in my head anymore, but it was in the 100s of K downloads (number of files). Personally, I have read many books published by project gutenberg on my PalmIIIx on trains and airplanes.

    The biggest Threat to Project Gutenberg is the extension of copyright laws. A lot of famous and interesting works ought to be copyright-free by now, but the constant extensions to copyright laws prevent them from entering the public domain. This is really a pity.Useable (used) PCs can be had for as little as $30. Combined with free software and free books, this could be a great tool for underpriviliged people and countries to "catch up" a little.

    We need more free information, damnit.

  101. Baen books by Elanor · · Score: 1

    Free library at
    http://www.baen.com/library/

    They also explain why they're doing it. Basically,
    they hook you in with the free book, so you'll buy the rest of the series.

    - Lnr

  102. In the world *they* imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you said "it's difficult and time-consuming to copy the data"

    If ebooks catch on the way the media companies do, they expect it to be impossible to copy the data from an ebook.

  103. I've written a couple of free books... by Pembers · · Score: 1

    ...follow the link in my .sig to read them.

    One is fantasy, for teenagers, and would be maybe 120 pages in paperback. The other is dystopian science fiction, for adults, and would be about 200 pages. Both are in plain HTML, without any kind of DRM. Older browsers might have trouble rendering the quotation marks and apostrophes properly, but Mozilla handles them fine, and that's [Ff]ree too.

    Many people in this thread have grumbled that computer screens, whatever technology they may be based on, aren't suitable for reading large amounts of text. Here's a suggestion. Read as much of the book as you can bear on-screen, or as much as you need to decide whether it's worth finishing, whichever comes first. Then, if you think it's good enough, print it out and read the rest like that. Simple, eh? (It's so simple that I should patent it... no, let's not go there.)

    OK, a printout isn't as nice to handle as a well-made paperback or hardback, but it's about as portable, it's a lot cheaper, you can print another if it gets lost or too dog-eared, and the words are the same in any case. Best of all, if you decide the book isn't worth reading, all it's cost you is the time you needed to reach that decision. (Yes, there's the cost of your net access while you download the book, and the running cost of your computer, but if money is tight enough that you have to worry about that, you probably shouldn't be wasting time reading novels ;-)

  104. Support your public library by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised by the success of free electronic books at all. Libraries have been making access to books something that everyone can afford for years. Publishers of copyrighted works should remember that the library has been one of their best sources of publicity for their products AND a great consumer of their products. I have probably 40-50 books that I've bought because I was first exposed to them at the library.

    Please remember to do your part to support your local public library. They serve a very important role in our society.

    $G

    --
    -- $G
  105. Response of the Nietzsche estate by yerricde · · Score: 2

    "Sonny Bono is dead." -- Project Gutenberg

    "Project Gutenberg is still dead." -- Mary Bono, executor of Sonny Bono's estate

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  106. Andrew Vachss by the_dragon_lady · · Score: 1

    A few years ago crime-fiction novelist Andrew Vachss searialized his first unpublished novel called A BOMB BUILT IN HELL on Amazon. Amazon posted a few chapters a day and gave the thing away for free.

    Shortly after, Vachss posted the entire novel on his website in PDF format for free download.

    Vachss certainly seems to embrace the give-em-something-free and they'll buy something too model. His website is full of short stories, novel excerpts and years worth of his non-fiction writing. [Samples: short stories & novel excerpts]

    From what I've read in interviews and heard him say at book signings, he's been really pleased with the reaction others have to the free stuff. He also feels it gives him a wider audience, because novels are slow to be published overseas. So he can build new, loyal readers for when work is available for them to buy there.

  107. What do you mean? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Return it after you read it?

    Common, have some morals...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  108. Self-promotion without quality is not good enough by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    But certainly go local is the best advice.

    Good luck.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  109. Re:Reading...on the computer screen is the pits by MLFnet · · Score: 1

    That is unless of course you have a RoadRunner. Believe me, I tried reading ebooks (mostly the Project Gutenberg Stuff, but sometimes the news with AvantGo) but reading on a palmV, a Casiopia, Compaq, and a full width (640 pixels) HP Jornada don't compare to the RoadRunner. The RoadRunner is a text-to-speech box that you can load a couple of book on (not much in the way of documentation but I have seen that it'll hold 2mb of files). Basically you can load up a bunch of book on it al listen to them anywhere. I know, books on tape/CD right? Wrong! Books on tape/CD are expensive, abridged, take forever to listen to (set reading speed), and you have to change the CD/tape all the time, (which I have also tried) My RoadRunner has been in use for over 60 hours without having to change the batteries! By my calculations it's running at 600+ WPM (10x faster than a book on tape). I listen to it everywhere I go and get questions about it all the time. It's the greatest electronic gizmo I've ever bought! Originally they were really expensive and aparently a new company has started making them and they're really cheap now. I stumbled upon their web-site www.CompanionDevices.com looking to see if there was any up to date info on the unit (I bought my unit off a friend of a blind friend of mine). In any case, I think it would be cool to see kids running around listening to books rather than that darn Rap music or the Rock and Roll. -=/ MLFnet /=-

  110. Re:Self-promotion without quality is not good enou by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=40690&threshol d=-1&commentsort=0&tid=109&mode=thread&pid=4330655

    Sorry this is the only way I could respond that I know you would read. Sorry also that I so late is responding - I don'y spend everyday looking at Slashdot - which looking at your logs you do. ;)

    Response:

    You said I am crazy? What kind of lame debating technique is that? ;)

    You say "Bin Laden is Rich" compared to the US? Are you nuts? He has $300 million while the US budget is in the TRILLIONS (that is the comparison I made if you read my post). The goal of my post was to draw a comparison of two powerful (and unpopular) monopolies who are being attacked by smaller less organized and far less funded organizations. That is all. I didn't draw any conclusions about the worth or righteousness of the struggles, just that they exist.

    -ShieldWolf (anonymous to save my karma).