Slashdot Mirror


Water Computing

Andrew_Cronin writes "This is a nice project that some one did at MIT on building some logic computation systems without using electrons.. So why not use water..."

303 comments

  1. Why not water? by packeteer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doesn't anyone know? Water and computers dont mix. Make up yuour mind. You can either make fun of water-cooling OR make computers out of water.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    1. Re:Why not water? by jjshoe · · Score: 3, Funny
      clean off your motherboard real good with rubbing alchol. (turn computer off, discharge all capacitators and DOUSE it with rubbing alchol) then what you do is get distilled water... and ofcourse you then poar that all over your computer whilest its running. i did this for a speach class. everyone was in shock... after the speach teacher yelled at me i was then given the only a.


      so what were you saying?

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    2. Re:Why not water? by foqn1bo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      So why not use water...

      Because its stupid.

    3. Re:Why not water? by packeteer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes i know that water doesn't conduct electricity. But most water cooling systems use water with addatives which cause them to conduct.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    4. Re:Why not water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be able to do this for a short while but can't wash the lead/copper/tin from the motherboard. Those will soon migrate into the water and you'll be back to square one with significant electrocution hazard.

    5. Re:Why not water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have water cooled computers made of water...

      I am adding.. No I am cooling... I am doing both

    6. Re:Why not water? by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Funny

      "i did this for a speach class"

      If it had been a writing class you would have been marked down a half grade ;-P

    7. Re:Why not water? by elveu · · Score: 1

      just make sure your mater is really pure, if it mixed with something on the computer (say if for some bizarre reason there was slat on it) then the water would conduct and rather then an a you would have a stuffed comptuer.

    8. Re:Why not water? by The+J+Kid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Water and computers dont mix

      You're right. Only Aqua and Macs mix.

      Oh wait....

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    9. Re:Why not water? by PEdelman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Water AND computers don't mix? I guess then its "You can either make fun of water-cooling XOR make computers out of water"

      --
      Like science? Comics? Wicked...
      Funny By Nature
    10. Re:Why not water? by Shelled · · Score: 2

      use pure alcohol. The rubbing version contains lanolin: good if you want to keep the motherboard baby smooth, bad if you want to keep it running.

    11. Re:Why not water? by poisonella · · Score: 1

      the hell it doesn't. try dropping a blow-drier in the bathtub while you're in it. and it doesn't need any addItives.

      if it's matter, there ARE electrons in it. surprise. H+ (hydrogen ion) is the exception, being a lone proton wandering around looking for an e- mate.

    12. Re:Why not water? by packeteer · · Score: 2

      You obviously dont understand electricity. Hydrogen has one electron in orbital 1s^1. Oxygen has 1s^2 2s^2 3p^4 electrons. So When they combine to make water there are no free electrons to make a electric circuit. Any tap water will contain impurities which DO contain free elctrons and will cause it to conduct. This is why bath water conducts. If you pour alcohol on a computer part (while it is off) and wait for it to evaporate it will be very clean. Then if oyu pour pure water on it it wont conduct. If you dont clean it right the dirt and metals will corrode and cause it to conduct. If anything with an electron in it conducted than nothing would be an insulator. Even air has a little bit of conductive proporties because of its impure nature. If you get a high enough voltage in a space enough space air will conduct too.
      Also there are no H+ ions in water. For The hydrogen to connect to the Oxygen it must have one electron. If your hydrogen atom has lost its (-) electron than its not part of a water molecule.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    13. Re:Why not water? by poisonella · · Score: 1

      when at pH 7, water has quite a few free electrons. pH = -log [H+]
      in simpler terms, pH is the negative log of the hydrogen ion concentration. and nanopure water conducts electricity quite well.
      what you described were orbitals, not electrons, and not all of them have to be filled at all times. and H+ (hytdrogen ion) has no electrons. it's a free proton.

    14. Re:Why not water? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      > Yes i know that water doesn't conduct
      > electricity. But most water cooling systems use
      > water with addatives which cause them to conduct.

      That's odd: heat transfer systems don't usually give a damn about electrical capacitance, and in my admittedly limited experience, in those cases where they do, it's to eliminate said, not promote it.

      Water conducts heat without additives. Has anyone else ever heard of tainted-water cooling?

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  2. MIT students?... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. how long until we see a computer constructed using bong water?

    1. Re:MIT students?... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      When servers start resembling toilets, then the stereotypes of geeks has NO CHANCE in hell of ever being redeemed.

    2. Re:MIT students?... by BitHive · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you even know what a bong is?

    3. Re:MIT students?... by Foresto · · Score: 2, Funny

      "how long until we see a computer constructed using bong water?"

      Maybe you should ask Ellen Feiss... rumor has it she's been using one.

      (Apologies to my Mac friends.)
    4. Re:MIT students?... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      i remember the first time i saw that ad i practically yelled, "put down the bong and maybe you can figure out where your paper went"

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    5. Re:MIT students?... by stinkythumbs · · Score: 1

      like Denis Leary said, "marijuana doesn't lead to harder drugs, it leads to carpentry!"

      --
      I wish I had more hands so I could give this post 4 thumbs down!
    6. Re:MIT students?... by Arnold_Crenshaw · · Score: 1

      That's what I was wondering...

    7. Re:MIT students?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would be one of the most popular people at any LAN party with this... (Bong water)

    8. Re:MIT students?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That's boNg, not bog.
      You know, the thing they use to improve dope smoking.
      I really hope it was an honest missing the letter that led to your comment...

    9. Re:MIT students?... by elveu · · Score: 1

      dude you really have to stop smoking out of the toilet.

    10. Re:MIT students?... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Do you even know what a bong is?

      Sorry, I posted to the wrong spot. Perhaps caused by too many bong hits :-)

    11. Re:MIT students?... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      > how long until we see a computer constructed
      > using bong water?

      Depends on what you mean by using. I made Abongcus some years ago, which is a bong made from a decorative abacus with very thick siderails. However, the water from the bong is not used in computation of anything other than the distance to the nearest chicken nugget.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  3. Eat your heart out Mac fans! by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's the real aqua!

  4. I can't resist... by srhuston · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brings new meaning to the term "Bit bucket"

    --
    Three dits, four dits, two dits, dah!
    Radio, radio, rah rah rah!
    1. Re:I can't resist... by speleo · · Score: 1

      Oh, man, you folks got beat to the punch on the water computing jokes. Another fellow did something similar awhile back. Search for "Guy Steele", "Crunchly", and "The Great Quux".

    2. Re:I can't resist... by srhuston · · Score: 2

      Where do you think I got the idea? :>

      The Advanced Dynamic Hydraulically-Operated Computer, complete with AD HOC software.

      --
      Three dits, four dits, two dits, dah!
      Radio, radio, rah rah rah!
    3. Re:I can't resist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was funny, not offtopic. If this was offtopic then so was the other funny posts, too.

  5. I got to see the pics before they get /.ed by PigeonGB · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think it is a cool concept. EMP wouldn't be such a problem. Lugging the thing to a LAN party would. Imagine having to carry Hinkley and Schmidt as well as the device.

    --
    I have 3656.9 Bogomips. How many Bogomips do you have?
    1. Re:I got to see the pics before they get /.ed by DimitryP · · Score: 1

      EMP? As in Electro-Magnetic Pulse? As in mushroom clouds due to uncontrolled nuclear fusion? I really don't think that EMP is much of a problem at LAN parties. Except, of course, in Pakistan and India.

      --
      Guns are like umbrellas and condoms. Better to have one and not need it, than need it and not have one.
    2. Re:I got to see the pics before they get /.ed by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, it might not be that bad. Just drain it and put it in a box. Looks like most of the components are plastic, so it'll be pretty light. When you get to where you're going, just fill it from the tap.

      Instant computer... just add water!

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    3. Re:I got to see the pics before they get /.ed by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Quoth Verteiron: Actually, it might not be that bad. Just drain it and put it in a box. Looks like most of the components are plastic, so it'll be pretty light. When you get to where you're going, just fill it from the tap.

      Mmmmyesss.. but look at the size of one transistor on that thing. If you're planning on making anything capable of running Quake 3 at a decent FPS, you're going to need several inconveniently large buildings to store it in, and a good couple of oceans to run through it...

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    4. Re:I got to see the pics before they get /.ed by tsa · · Score: 2

      Does anyone know what exactly happens during an EMP that destroys electronic equipment? Is it just heated to destruction or has it soemthing to do with the electrons in the semiconductors that get all messed up?

      --

      -- Cheers!

    5. Re:I got to see the pics before they get /.ed by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      If I'm not mistaken, an EMP induces a large charge onto any kind of conductive surface. Tesla would probably have loved the idea as a way to transmit power, but it's kind of destructive to any modern electronics, with the charge frying delicate circuitry. A Faraday Cage will shield against it, though; the charge accumulates on the outer surface but penetrates no further.

      Scary factoid: Half a dozen high-end nukes detonated in LEO at various points over North America would, without directly killing anyone, put out enough of an EMP to send the whole continent back into the stone age.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    6. Re:I got to see the pics before they get /.ed by kaiidth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      EMPs are basically just sudden extremely intense electromagnetic fields that appear and disappear, producing something like one nanosecond worth of electric field in whatever is within range. They're extremely 'dirty' - there's a large range of frequencies, which complicates things. The actual magnitude of the field isn't that great, less than your average lightning strike, but the problem is the rate at which the pulse occurs - which is much faster.

      Any conductor will pick up on this effect, like metal pipes, land lines, what have you, which naturally tends to destroy anything connected to said devices. Processors and such are particularly vulnerable to, as you say, heating to destruction, since the devices cannot dissipate the extra heat.

      You're pretty much right both ways, I think, in that overheating and 'messed up electrons' probably go hand in hand.

      Incidentally, this hearing suggests another effect of high-altitude nuclear bursts, which is to fill the Van Allen belt with radiation and thus destroy all the low-earth orbit satellites not specifically designed for a high - radiation environment.

    7. Re:I got to see the pics before they get /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to clarify, that's not a transistor, that's a logic gate. Gates are not necessarily made out of transistors.

    8. Re:I got to see the pics before they get /.ed by Handpaper · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of a story about the first MiG-25 Foxbat whose pilot defected ( I think to Japan). USAF technicians dismantling the aircraft pissed themselves laughing at the "backward" Russians when they discovered that all the electronic systems aboard were valve(tube) driven. Until that is, they realised that valves are immune to EMP (and static electricity, overvoltage and heat). The aircraft were designed to be EMP-resistant and did not contain a single semiconductor device.

  6. So... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you overclock it, can it cool itself?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:So... by EvilCabbage · · Score: 5, Funny

      Probably not, but I bet you could steam rice with it.

    2. Re:So... by elveu · · Score: 1

      forget making your computer control a coffee machine make the coffee inside the computer.

    3. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's cooled with electrons.

  7. How are we going to cool the thing off? by jpt.d · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will we use electricity to cool it? Well water is a very effective cooler on electronics, so why not do it the reverse when your water is your 'electronics'?

    ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPppp pp pppppppppp

    YOUCH!!!!!

    DAMN ME!!!!! THAT !*!@# HURTS.

    Scratch that idea.

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
    1. Re:How are we going to cool the thing off? by iNiTiUM · · Score: 1

      With ice.....duh

      --
      When encryption is outlawed, ou++1!@(93j++js-d9298yIUH(*Y24JKB!~
    2. Re:How are we going to cool the thing off? by negativethirsty · · Score: 2, Funny

      better grab the patent on that while you still have time!

      --

      thirsty*i^2

      "Ya I finished that last week, it just doesn't work"
    3. Re:How are we going to cool the thing off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too late ;-)

  8. Without electronics... by wilburdg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He says without electronics, not without electrons... Last time I checked a molecule of water had, oh say about 10 electrons in it...

    1. Re:Without electronics... by wilburdg · · Score: 2

      Damn, I hate replying to my own post... Ok, ok, so he did say without electrons... But he meant without electronics... =)

    2. Re:Without electronics... by therealmoose · · Score: 2

      Try 10 (2 per hydrogen, 6 on the oxygen)

    3. Re:Without electronics... by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen has 1 electron
      Oxygen has 8

      that means h2o has 10.

    4. Re:Without electronics... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      Well, it's 10 but it's 1 on each hydrogen atom, 8 on the oxygen.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    5. Re:Without electronics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked a molecule of water had, oh say about 10 electrons in it...


      Try 10 (2 per hydrogen, 6 on the oxygen)


      A water molecule actually has 8 electrons. The oxygen molecule originally has 6 electrons. Hydrogen, then shares its electron with oxygen, adding two more electrons.

    6. Re:Without electronics... by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Except, of course, that assertion involves simplifying assumptions, too.

      We could go as far as high school chemistry and decide that there are 2 core 1s electrons definitely associated with the oxygen, plus four more electrons that are part of lone pairs on the oxygen (probably also mostly belonging to the oxygen atom). Then there's four electrons involved in the two sigma bonds joining the oxygen to the hydrogen. Simplest story is that it shares two with each hydrogen.

      If we break out the molecular orbital theory, then it starts to get kind of messy. At the lowest level, we have a really ugly n-body problem. We can't solve the Schrodinger equation analytically for this case, so we're limited to approximate numeric solutions. (Technically, we should really account for relativistic effects and use the Dirac equation, but that's overkill for lightweight atoms like these.)

      Even then, solving for the wavefunctions by whatever method only gives us a probability that electrons will be located nearest a given atom. In principle, occasionally all 10 electrons could actually be closest to one of the protons, but you would have to wait a loooooong time for it to happen.

      Oh, yes--if I wanted to be picky, I could also mention that pure water will still undergo spontanous autoionization to form H+ (H3O+, actually) and OH- ions, containing the same number of electrons, but now the wrong number of protons...

      One more, then I'm done. Liquid water actually tends to get kind of clumpy. In the so-called 'flickering cluster' model, water molecules in the liquid phase form short-lived hydrogen bonded clumps containing several (or even several tens of) water molecules. These clumps have an electron count that depends (of course) on their size.

      Water is actually an incredibly interesting beast, chemically speaking. We take it for granted because it is ubiquitous, but there is a tremendous amount of very interesting stuff that it can do.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    7. Re:Without electronics... by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      We don't need to solve Quantum Mechanics here. Water is uncharged, so the number of protons and electrons have to balance. All I was doing was counting the protons.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    8. Re:Without electronics... by Vann_v2 · · Score: 1

      Water is polar, not purely covalent.

    9. Re:Without electronics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad that completely ignores that 2 non-covalent electrons in the s1 shell of oxygen.

      what a maroon...

    10. Re:Without electronics... by tunah · · Score: 2

      So, do you fish?

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    11. Re:Without electronics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, water has a charge. Ergo yuo=wrong

    12. Re:Without electronics... by asobala · · Score: 1

      You're not _using_ the electrons. If you drink a glass of water you're not using the ... I don't know, let's say quarks :-) [1] since they aren't being changed or performing any useful function. In a water computer, electrons are there but they don't do the computing.

      [1] I know they're really a theoretical model. You think of a better analogy.

    13. Re:Without electronics... by Rubyflame · · Score: 1

      So, since you're not using the quarks, you could just remove them and it would be all the same as far as you're concerned. Is that what you're saying?

      --

      All it takes is nukes and nerves.
    14. Re:Without electronics... by asobala · · Score: 1

      If you give me a glass of magic water, water in all respects but with 3 quorns in each proton/neutron instead of quarks but something that acts in all respects like WATER, it would not concern me. No.

  9. Someone drank it... by Lobsang · · Score: 3, Funny

    Either that or the Slashdot crew already crashed the "Water Computer". :))

    1. Re:Someone drank it... by llamalicious · · Score: 3, Funny

      mmm, no, sorry.

      Water-based computers do not crash, they Flush.
      As in: That's site's been /.'d, musta flushed the web server.

  10. OC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have success OC'ing this baby?

    1. Re:OC... by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Anyone have success OC'ing this baby?
      Heck yeah! I got mine up to 20 millilitres/second!
      [/joke]

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  11. My 0.02 Mesta... by 403Forbidden · · Score: 2, Redundant

    So why not use water..."

    Well, since the site is already slashdotted (only the title is showing up for me) i'll have to use all the power of my brain to guesstimate.

    Why not use water? The answer is simple really. If you can use such liquids to proform logical computations then it would be adventageous to use a liquid with a VERY high boiling point to prevent all your data from boiling off into steam...

    Hmmm... I can see it now "that data has to be uncompressed into steam, heat it up a bit."

  12. humm, reminds me of an old Dr. Who ep by MaxQuordlepleen · · Score: 1

    "The two doctors", with Colin Baker and Patrick Troughton had a liquid-based computer in it, I always thought that was a cool idea.. but isn't it massively slow?? Water's speed as determined by gravity is going to be a hell of a lot slower than light...

    1. Re:humm, reminds me of an old Dr. Who ep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying massively slow is just stupid. Its like saying oh aren't those electronic computers tiny fast.... No thats not a good example - it'd go over most heads here. Nevermind.

    2. Re:humm, reminds me of an old Dr. Who ep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, massively is an adverb, tiny is an adjective so not only is that not a good example, it's a horrible example.

      but guess what! it may not be as slow as you peons think. remember, water pushed at the beggining INSTANTLY pushes the water at the end of the tube. so it's just a matter of timing.

    3. Re:humm, reminds me of an old Dr. Who ep by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2

      The original Rollerball had one too. Don't remember it's name, but there was a main user interface of some kind that looked like a garganguan bubbling aquarium. None too reliable either; it misplaces the 14th century. "Ah well, only Dante and a few corrupt popes," as Ralph Richardson said at the time.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    4. Re:humm, reminds me of an old Dr. Who ep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. I never bothered learning that crap I was just pointing out your weird phrase. Doesn't matter if it is an adverb it doesn't make it right. Speaking of which if you know so much about grammar then why are you so bad at it?

      Oh, and you should publish your "instant water" theory. You'd be a shoe in for the Nobel prize after breaking Einstein's theories of relativity.

    5. Re:humm, reminds me of an old Dr. Who ep by Warped-Reality · · Score: 1

      um, yeah, thats how normal electricity flows as well. You don't fire an electron down a wire, you more or less stick one in one end, forcing a different one out the other. Think of a tube of marbles, you put a marble in one end, and another one comes out the opposite end instantaniously - you don't wait for the marble to roll down the tube.

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    6. Re:humm, reminds me of an old Dr. Who ep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um yeah, thats right, and maybe in your warped reality the water/electrons/etc "flow" faster than the speed of light too, do they?

  13. At least it won't... by netsharc · · Score: 2, Funny

    burst into flames after the slashdotting.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  14. 10 electrons in H20 by zedge · · Score: 2, Informative

    So it is not exactly true that they
    are computing without electrons.

    1. Re:10 electrons in H20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its amazing how many armchair chemists there are here. All internet sites with the phrase "periodic table" are probably slashdotted too.

    2. Re:10 electrons in H20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Armchair chemists"? That's grade 10 science class, not some advanced molecular knowledge. Many of the posters on Slashdot are in about grade 10, so it fits nicely.

    3. Re:10 electrons in H20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? In grade 10 I was taught that H has 1 electron and oxy has 8. Never that the H2O molecule has 10 however.

    4. Re:10 electrons in H20 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in what grade were you taught how to add?

  15. The glass isn't half empty... by EvilAlien · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... its half full of beowulf clusters of water computing power.

    I couldn't resist, sorry.

    As we get closer and closer to microscoptic or at least very small computers, how long until the inevitable complex systems of neural nets combined with tiny computing devices self-organizes into something with capabilities outstripping an expert system... and into something like SkyNet in the Terminator movies?

    The self-organization of a complex system into a self-aware artificial intelligence is a chaos theory wet dream.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    1. Re:The glass isn't half empty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least it's *easy* to imagine a beowulf cluster of these... it might look a lot like the ocean :)

  16. electrons vs. water by misterhaan · · Score: 2, Funny

    uh . . . this might be my fault. i told a bunch of people i tutored that electrons moved down a wire just like water moved down a pipe. it seemed to be the most effective analogy. but now someone has taken it too far!

    --

    track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

  17. But what about...? by msaulters · · Score: 2, Funny

    Very cool, but I gotta ask two questions... 1) how to implement other operation: OR, NOT, etc. and 2) It looks like he lets the excess water simply run off... no method for collection or recycling.

    Naturally, this brings to mind all sorts of jokes about computers that can finally REALLY do windows. Still, one wonders: What's so original about this? Who hasn't operated a steam-driven computer while playing Myst or Riven?

    --
    These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    1. Re:But what about...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      how to implement other operation: OR, NOT

      Simple. The author gives XOR and AND gates, formed from joining two streams together, without and without a control. (See the article for details, I haven't taken the time to look into it very deeply).

      Anyways, XOR's function number is 0110. Split it in two, and you get "A(01) when B=0, NOT A(10) when B=1"--two unary gates formed a binary gate. Split AND's function, 0001, and you get "0 when B=0, A when B=1". Trust me, this is easier than it seems. The unary gates are: 00=0, 01=B, 10=NOT B, and 11=1. Now that we got that out of the way:

      • 0 XOR A = A
      • 1 XOR A = NOT A
      • 0 AND A = 0
      • 1 AND A = A

      None of those are useful except 1^A=!A. We need NOT to complete our library of functions too. Now we can combine it with other gates like so using Boolean Algebra:

      NOT(A XOR B) = A XNOR B
      NOT(A AND B) = NOT(A) OR NOT(B)DeMorgan's Law
      NOT(A AND NOT(B)) = NOT(A) OR NOT(NOT(B)) = NOT(A) OR B
      And now, ladies and gentlement, I present to you, The OR Gate:

      not(not(a) and not(b)) = not(not(a)) or not(not(b)) = a or b

      This is constructed from: 1 xor ((1 xor a) and (1 xor b)), and of course the 1 is simply a constant flowing stream of high-power water. And obviously, since NAND is a universal gate, this can be done like so:

      1 xor (a and b) = a nand b
      NAND can make any gate, including NOT, which is then combined as we saw above to form OR, NOR, XOR, XNOR, and even inhibitation and implication if you please.

      Did that answer your question?

      -jc

    2. Re:But what about...? by msaulters · · Score: 2

      Yes and No.

      Yes, I already had a basic grasp of how to do it.

      but

      No, I would like to see it done in one unit.

      --
      These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    3. Re:But what about...? by Xzzy · · Score: 3, Informative

      > 1) how to implement other operation: OR, NOT,

      well, following on the system he started you can probably get the effect of OR or NOT by altering how the "computer" reacts to the outputs, using the existing gate.

      You could make an OR gate by wiring the two outputs together. Get water in either jet, and you get a 1. Put water in both jets and you get a 1. Put no water in either jet, you get a 0.

      A NOT is just as simple, except you need a constant jet feeding through the gate. No water in the other jet means a 0 converts to a 1, water in both jets dumps into waste and creates a 0.

      So there you have it.. by tweaking he inputs/outputs of the single existing gate you can create pretty much any conditional you desire.

    4. Re:But what about...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me how its done in one unit on traditional computers. Even the simplest NAND gate requries several transistors.

    5. Re:But what about...? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Problem with `wiring the two outputs together' is that if both are 1, the output would be 2 (double the pressure). I suspect the XOR/AND gate would malfunction if one side is 1 and the other is 2...

      --
      Luke-Jr
  18. I just got the pictures... by 403Forbidden · · Score: 2

    Now that i see the project itself, a thought came to me...

    What if lego pulls a patent suit in order to only let children use them? Just think of all the tinkerers who will have to pay royalties in order to mount prototypes on legos... It's also quite funny to see a lego device hooked up with some tubes to this huge complex computer.

    1. Re:I just got the pictures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only part that was lego is the base, the rest were laser cut pieces of acrylic.

    2. Re:I just got the pictures... by rotwhylr · · Score: 1

      Hmmm ... maybe Lego will modify their EULA to include a "developer/personal use " clause.

      --
      -- Windows is not simply installed on a computer; it is inflicted.
  19. I plan to take it one step further.. by Zod000 · · Score: 1

    ..and combine this water pc into my water bed!! Now I can be use my pc in bed without one of those crappy wireless keyboards!

    --
    People seem much brighter once you light them on fire.
    1. Re:I plan to take it one step further.. by dr_dank · · Score: 2

      combine this water pc into my water bed!! Now I can be use my pc in bed without one of those crappy wireless keyboards!

      Nah, just build it into the toilet. Makes rebooting all that much more fun. Turn any public restroom into a beowulf cluster!

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:I plan to take it one step further.. by squarefish · · Score: 3, Funny

      computer, bed, only one thing missing...p0rn? you must be into watersports!

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  20. Cool...but an old concept by dillon_rinker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scientific American had an article about water-based logic gates and circuits some decades ago. IIRC, they even created circuits that had no electronic analogy. I can find no reference to this on the web - perhaps some other science geek with access to a complete collection could find it. I believe it was in the Amateur Scientist, but it's been about fifteen years since I read through the stacks of magazines in the cabinets of my chemistry classroom, so I could be mistaken.

    For a similar concept (ie, non-silicon machine logic) that I first read about in the pages of Scientific American, check out the Apraphulians here . For more info on this ancient race, Google is your friend.

    1. Re:Cool...but an old concept by friscolr · · Score: 5, Interesting
      In "The Way Things Work" (1988) David Macaulay also illustrates logic gates as plumbing in a building. It's on page 333 of the original book; the newer version even has an interesting rant about Bill Gates.

      i always liked old school water clocks.

      i seem to recall something about logic gates or some sort of logic being built out of matchboxes and beans. it played tictactoe, deciding the best move by plopping out a bean of a certain colour? i can remember neither the details nor the source.

    2. Re:Cool...but an old concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (ie, non-silicon machine logic)

      not to mention the countless adding machines throughout the ages as well as Babbage's Analytical Device/Differential Engine

    3. Re:Cool...but an old concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      non-silicon machine logic

      u mean like.. Galleum Arsenide? *rimshot*

    4. Re:Cool...but an old concept by noshellswill · · Score: 0

      Hummm ... seems to me I turned down a job doing this about ... say, 1966 ... On a visit to the company lab, looked like many of the hydraulic circuits were all ready developed. Problems with friction, no doubt.

    5. Re:Cool...but an old concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stay away from children you pervet!

    6. Re:Cool...but an old concept by FozzTexx · · Score: 2, Informative
      i seem to recall something about logic gates or some sort of logic being built out of matchboxes and beans. it played tictactoe, deciding the best move by plopping out a bean of a certain colour? i can remember neither the details nor the source.


      I've seen it in a book by Martin Gardner, the game was called Hexapawn. A quick search on google should turn up more details.
    7. Re:Cool...but an old concept by McCart42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speaking of logic, here's a October 1989 Scientific American article detailing the tinkertoy tic-tac-toe playing machine. Anybody want to make this out of these water logic components? Didn't think so... ;)

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    8. Re:Cool...but an old concept by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      I know a guy that builds machines with "air logic". I don't think it is that different of a concept, both are fluids, although one is liquid, the other gasseous.

      I think this air logic allowed him to run a machine in hazardous material atmospheres, where any risk of electrical components causing a spark was unacceptable. It was mostly for manufacturing and control.

    9. Re:Cool...but an old concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I made a hat out of a stick and a lobster.

    10. Re:Cool...but an old concept by anonymous+loser · · Score: 3, Informative

      The "apraphulian computer" article in 1988 was an April Fool's joke. A.K. Dewdney has a history of presenting interesting scientific concepts as fiction. You can find examples of this style of presentation in his book Planiverse as well as some of the earlier corewars articles in Scientific American IIRC.

    11. Re:Cool...but an old concept by martyb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      i seem to recall something about logic gates or some sort of logic being built out of matchboxes and beans. it played tictactoe, deciding the best move by plopping out a bean of a certain colour? i can remember neither the details nor the source.
      I've seen it in a book by Martin Gardner, the game was called Hexapawn. A quick search on google should turn up more details.
      Interesting! In short: it's an exhaustive search of all moves from black's perspective whereby all moves are initially possible and a loss causes the last move to be removed as a choice. I found the info here. There's more at the site including how to implement it programatically.

      Here's their explanation of the matchbox version of the game:

      Gardner's machine is implemented as a set of 24 matchboxes, one for each possible board position when it is Black's move. Each matchbox has pasted on it a drawing showing this board position, as well as all possible moves from that position, drawn in different colors. Inside each matchbox are several colored beads, one for each move on the top. When it is the machine's turn to move, the human operator finds the matchbox showing the current position, draws a bead at random from the matchbox, replaces it, and makes the move thus chosen. The machine learns from its losses: when it loses, the operator removes and discards the last bead drawn. This ensures that the machine will never lose in this way again.

      To keep this on topic: this game could be implemented with a water computer, too. Replace the matchboxes with different colored buckets of water. Instead of removing a bead for a loss, dump out the corresponding bucket.

      For a more enjoyable game, replace the buckets of water with shots of beer. =)

    12. Re:Cool...but an old concept by !!!!!!blameblameblam · · Score: 1

      The computer museum in Boston has a computer made completely out of Tinkertoys and string which will always win or draw at TicTacToe. IIRC each edge is about 4 feet long. It's pretty cool to watch the pulleys go!

    13. Re:Cool...but an old concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, too, remember an old Scientific American article that dealt with liquid computing, yet not which one.

      I seem to remember it exampled an automotive windshield wiper "circuit". Thin plates were drilled with holes and lines such that, when stacked one upon another, they created channels within a block. At the convergence of channels, fluid flowing down one channel would block fluid flowing down the other, etc.

      I tried searching on it, but came up blank.

    14. Re:Cool...but an old concept by leshert · · Score: 2

      I don't know if it was factual or not, but such a beast was alluded to in the fiction book "The Adolescence of P-1".

  21. Interesting operations... by Speedy8 · · Score: 2

    I wonder if using water as a medium can allow it to do someoperations very efficiently, (at least in comparitive scale) operations like addition and subtraction might be accomplished through butting all of the water from cell one to cell two, or the greater then operations could involve wichever is heavier. I think it is an interesting way to look at the rudementury operations.

  22. Slashdotting.. by chainsaw_alligator · · Score: 1

    It's inferior because it still cannot take a few minutes of slashdotting.

  23. In case of slashdotting by cascino · · Score: 2
  24. umm.... this is news? by eclectric · · Score: 1, Informative

    The "idiots guide to computers" class I was forced to take in college included this project as an example of how logic circuits work. And they one they had was more complex. And it used kool-aid. I've seen this project in at least 10 CS departments. Dammit, this is not news. This would be better if it was a four digit binary adder.

    1. Re:umm.... this is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you look all the way down the page? they've got a four bit adder there.... using a lego board as a base, no less...

    2. Re:umm.... this is news? by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      This would be better if it was a four digit binary adder.
      Um, it was.
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  25. googles cached page by jjshoe · · Score: 1
    a href="http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:lC1mWct RaqQC:web.media.mit.edu/~paulo/courses/howmake/mlf abfinalproject.htm+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8">her e


    which happens to be coming up slow as snot for me too...

    --
    -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  26. why not use air? by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is just a big pile of hydraulic logic that forms some gates, and ultimately a 4 bit adder. Thats hardly a computer, but pretty neat.

    We had a pneumatic logic kit bouncing around the electronics shop in high school.. I dusted it off and made pretty much the same thing, using compressed air. It was more fun to play with than 7400 series ICs and breadboards.

    Though I didn't machine the parts like this guy did. I guess thats whats impressive. The U shaped spill collector is novel, if sloppy. Dunno whats wrong with valves.

    Hydraulic/pneumatic logic is nothing new. Even if you call it "fluidics".

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:why not use air? by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Probably the first "modern"computer, the Z1 (Germany, early 30's) used aluminum moving parts (!)but because of difficulties with these sort of parts, the Z2, Z3, Z4, and Z5 used electronic relays. (Z1 was destroyed by allied bombing).

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    2. Re:why not use air? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, even the term 'fluidics' is at least 40 years old, as it appears in my trusty old Encyclopeadia Brittanica, and there's even pictures of sheets of metal with channels and holes, forming logic gates.
      Used for control in nuclear power plants, where the radiation and temperature would kill any electronics.

    3. Re:why not use air? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I thought the third reich had 'em dismantled for parts, seeing no practical use for em..

      Pretty freaky.. Konrad Zuse built the things out of tin cans and junk, and was in many ways way ahead of the giant megaprojects of the allieds..

      Lacked any form of branching instruction, though, as I recall.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:why not use air? by Tomble · · Score: 1

      Similarily, I seem to remember first hearing about water computers (or maybe some equivalent similar to what you describe) being used in environments where electricity could be dangerous- because of possible fuel leaks and such.

      --
      Be careful! New moon tonight.
  27. Very good by Istealmymusic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I remember of Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon, where when L.P.Waterhouse was walking amongst the beach at sundown, in a starlit avenue, and he drew lines in the sand. This was inspiration for barcodes, but that's beside the point. The point is Stephenson had the narrator narrate L.P.Waterhouse notice how the ocean is a Turing machine, it interacts with the sand, due to certain mathematical fluidity properties, to leave an indentation of predictable properties.

    I've considered water-based computation long ago, but hats off to this student for logic design and implementation. My idea was to have water push open another wate gate, much like a flow-controlled valve, allowing for a water-based transistor. Combine this with other transistors, and you can build virtually any gate--I take that back, any gate you want. XOR and AND are good choices, as with a XOR a you can get NOT, to make a NAND, and as we all know NAND is the Univesal Binary Gate.

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    1. Re:Very good by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      NAND is the Univesal Binary Gate.

      In principle, couldn't XOR be used to construct all the other gates as well? Who needs a NAND explicitly? You can make an AND from XORs. An as stated, you can also get a NOT from XORs.

      Yes, of course you can build up all the NANDs you need from XORs, and then use those composite gates to build the rest of the gates--but it's more efficient to skip the middle step of constructing the NANDs.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    2. Re:Very good by twitter · · Score: 2
      good indeed. Sounds like basic hydraulic control circuits, easily implemented with hydraulic moving cylinder switches or AOV like diaphrams. Diapharm takes signal from flow to acuate further flow.

      First drill a small hole through your bar stock for flow. This is a restriction of flow so that your controler can work. Now drill a larger hole through the length of your bar stock that intersects and devides the smaller hole and hone it well. Now shove a machined cylinder with a hole into the larger hole. When you move the cylinder with the hole in it to line up with your flow path, you have an open switch. When the flow path is obstructed with the larger cylinder, you have a closed switch. The degree of obstruction determines the amount that flows. You, of course, will have to use O-rings on the cylinder and weep holes in the barstock the feed to a return to make this switch pratical. A spring is used to keep our cyliner in place and two diaphams or small hydraulic rams can be set up on either side to make an exclusive nor gate. A not gate would have only a spring and one diaphram. As you say, you can build any gate like this.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    3. Re:Very good by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2
      If you show me how to make ANDs from XORs, I'd be impressed. Here are my findings, breakthroughs highlighted in bold:
      • 0 xor A=A
      • 1 xor A=not A
      • A xor A=1
      • not (A xor B) = A xnor B
      • 0 xnor A=not A
      • 1 xnor A=A
      • A xnor A=0

      That's all you can create from XOR. The unary NOT, unary buffer, and the useless unary constant functions--to my knowledge.

      I vaguely remember "proving" only NOR and NAND are universal gates in my childhood, but that has long since passed. What am I missing, perhaps an equation involving an XOR with NOT on one side, or usage of the oddball binary inhibitation and implication gates?

      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    4. Re:Very good by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      Okay, there may be a more efficient way to do this, but I just sketched something out.

      not(A xor {not[((not A) xor B) xor ((not B) xor A)]})

      I think is equivalent to A and B. (not A is just A xor 1, so I didn't write that explicitly.) There's probably a more efficient solution, and I have to go out this morning so I'm not absolutely certain of my notation above...translating whiteboard to Slashcomment is not my forte.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:Very good by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      Dammit. I knew I shouldn't have rushed.

      I'm wrong; don't bother trying to check my work. Sigh. Making an AND out of XOR probably *is* impossible.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    6. Re:Very good by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Read the article... The XOR chip works like AND too.

      --
      Luke-Jr
    7. Re:Very good by jannotti · · Score: 1

      AND and OR, both have a kind of "preference" for one of the truth values. AND likes to make things false. OR likes to make things true. XOR is unbiased, so is NOT. I think that's a reasonable intuition for why XOR can't make AND or OR.

    8. Re:Very good by kbielefe · · Score: 2
      A quick check of my digital logic design textbook verifies that NAND and NOR can be used to implement any logic circuit.

      NAND gates are used in TTL and CMOS circuits that are more common that ECL logic, which uses mainly NOR gates.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  28. Who else tried this? by thekernel32 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really remember seeing a documentary on how the russians tried using water logic for computations and got pretty good with it back in the 40's. Then again they did alot of cool stuff over in that part of the world. They actually managed to stick with 50's technology for 40 years. yay communism! I knew someone who had no more after the berlin wall came down just because his job was dependent upon the crappy stuff they made breaking down. Reliable products from the west caused alot of people to loose their jobs.

    I know it's an off topic rant, wanna give me some points for being interesting anyway?

    1. Re:Who else tried this? by drDugan · · Score: 3, Informative

      several years ago -- spring '95

      a water adder capable of adding 2 8 bit values

      LINK

  29. 5000 year old technology by bachlab · · Score: 1

    Ancient peoples used similair logic when building irrigation canal systems.

  30. How is it cooled? by dstone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe you cool a water computer with silicon? ;-) Sorry.

  31. Bad water/slashdotting joke... by Cheetah86 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looks like we "flooded" the server...

    1. Re:Bad water/slashdotting joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your tag usage is incorrect, you should have used PUN tags instead.

    2. Re:Bad water/slashdotting joke... by Tablizer · · Score: 1


      "Roto Rooter, that's the name, we'll reboot your server and restore your domain."

      "Hello Roto Rooter! I have been Slashdotted. Can you help?"

  32. Re:Why not water? Here's why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where eletronic control devices don't offer the reliability of cannot support the envoronment. Also, military technologies use Fluidics in order to prevent malfunction in a nuclear war, when eletric devices cease to work.

    Water logic may be able to function as a 4-bit adder, but I'm sticking with electric devices for spelling and grammar checks!

  33. okay, maybe it's a stupid idea... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 5, Funny
    But the thought just came to me of using beer instead of water. That way you could make a beer computer! Who says beer makes you shite at math? you CAN get drunk and still do 4 bit additions :)

    Hell, take that thing on a pub crawl and have your beer do it's own calculations of how much tip you should leave as it's on it's way down to your stomach!

    --

    Liberty.

    1. Re:okay, maybe it's a stupid idea... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 4, Funny

      But occifer, that's not a keg in the passenger seat. It's my laptop's battery pack!

      --

      Liberty.

    2. Re:okay, maybe it's a stupid idea... by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Are you just going to reply to your own post until its funny?

      'Cause if so, you're in for a long night.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:okay, maybe it's a stupid idea... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2
      I'm sorry, was that a faux pas?

      Egg on my face.

      Karma: Eggcellent (mostly affected by moderation done to your comments)

      --

      Liberty.

    4. Re:okay, maybe it's a stupid idea... by hangingonwords · · Score: 1

      for shame beer critics, for shame... i for one laughed at your beer computer that runs on beer using only beer to perform beer tasks that is only worthy of one that can appreciate a beer tasting computer. i like beer. /paul

      --
      fact: microsoft > linux
    5. Re:okay, maybe it's a stupid idea... by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Funny
      But the thought just came to me of using beer instead of water. That way you could make a beer computer! Who says beer makes you shite at math? you CAN get drunk and still do 4 bit additions :)

      The big problem is the head on the beer. Bubbles would probably affect the logic in unpredictable ways. In other words, if your computer got...um...sloshed, then it probably couldn't calculate a tip any better than you could.

      And God help you if you tried to do any serious math. You know what they say...Don't drink and derive. It applies to you and your computer, now.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    6. Re:okay, maybe it's a stupid idea... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      thats ok

      i was just trying to burn excess karma

      nothing personal, and good morrow to you sir

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    7. Re:okay, maybe it's a stupid idea... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding, bubbles would be a great thing for exploring advanced principles in quasi-boolean computation...just as uncertainty can be dealt with by "fuzzy logic" in digital systems, the Beer Computer can employ "frothy logic".

    8. Re:okay, maybe it's a stupid idea... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      ...I meant to add, that of course Guinness Stout would be my fluidic medium of choice for this!

  34. Google Cache by ogre2112 · · Score: 1

    Here's the google cache, although it doesn't say much without the pictures..

    http://216.239.37.100/search?q=cache:lC1mWctRaqQ C: web.media.mit.edu/~paulo/courses/howmake/mlfabfina lproject.htm+mlfabfinalproject&hl=en&ie=UT F-8

    If that gets cut off, try this: (100% guaranteed non-goatse.cx ;)

    http://makeashorterlink.com/?E53612F32

  35. So tell me this... by Tuffnut · · Score: 1

    What exactly does this ..*laugh* "water computer" compute?

    1. Re:So tell me this... by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Informative

      nothing, its an xor and an and gate using water instead of electricity.

      you know, the type of bullshit an 8th grader would do for the science fair?

      sheesh. this /. karma is getting downright embarassing. please relieve me of it, mods.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:So tell me this... by Tuffnut · · Score: 1

      bastard... leeching off my karma =P

    3. Re:So tell me this... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      jumpin jeebus!

      whats a fella gotta do to get modded down around here?

      oh i know

      the fonts on my win2k box look great, and it needs no outlook killer - i got the real thing

      thank you

      oh yeah, tux is lame, and ellen feiss symbolizes all that is and ever was macintosh

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:So tell me this... by URSpider · · Score: 1
      you know, the type of bullshit an 8th grader would do for the science fair?

      Hmmm. Obviously, you have not spent much time following the output of the MIT Media Lab (which is hard to believe if you're a regular /. reader)...

  36. This by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    is an article I would expect to see in a tabloid like Cnet.. or soemthing equally for the nongeek masses.

    Any nerd that's worth his salt knows that logic gates can be built out of all kinds of things, and that using water is nothing new.

    Seriously, what is new or interesting about this at all?

    1. Re:This by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      "all kinds of things"

      Can you name some others? I've always enjoyed thinking about doing computing in weird forms.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    2. Re:This by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      I remember a guy built a computer to play tic-tac-toe out of tinkertoys... it's still on display in a museum somewhere.

      Pneumatics would work (compressed gas based)

      Light is the obvious one that might actually be really useful.

      mechanics can do it.. gears and switches.

      Conceptually, something like rod logic in neal stephenson's The Diamond Age is neat to think about. (mechanical logic, but on a nanotech scale) good book if you haven't read it, though more for the concepts than the story itself.

  37. Obligatory by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 2

    So, a beowulf cluster could flood a city block if it was OCed and burned out....

    Now the guy can do basic logic, but this must be very slow. It is wonderfull seeing someone trying to educate people about computers. Most people have no idea what an XOR gate is, or a transistor for that matter. Well I wish him good luck.

    Please ignore above troll

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  38. Beowful Possibilities by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

    Hey! Imagine a cluster of these!

    Oh, wait. That's called a "drink."

    *sigh

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  39. Imagine! by hdparm · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't beowulf cluster of these be cool?

    1. Re:Imagine! by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      No, it would boil.

  40. A FLOWING word of advice. by WebWiz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't read this article when you are on your 8th Corona. I got half way through, then had this sudden urge to, well...piss like a race horse. ....I'm goin to get my freak on at the clubs -

    PEACE

    Thanks,

    N-dogg.

    1. Re:A FLOWING word of advice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow -- you drink BEER! What's it like? Do you get all, like, drunk? That's amazing! Can I hang out with you? Will you buy beer for me and my girlfriends. I love you.

  41. Practical Applications by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 0

    Perhaps my toilet will be able to play mp3's when i flush from now on.

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
  42. pedantic by rhombic · · Score: 1

    The oxygen has six of it's own. The hydrogens have none of their own. Four electrons are shared in covalent bonds.

    Still adds up to 10

    --
    1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    1. Re:pedantic by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      I was doing the math based on the individual elements, not claiming anything about the final structure, or where those electrons happen to exist in relation to the elements in the molecule.

  43. gee whiz by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    This guys project would make a neato high school science fair project. The most difficult thing seemed to be keeping the water contained. The only thing that saves this from being a joke is that it was done in the "Future of Learning Group". This works well as a demonstration of how computers work for elementary school kids, and makes the whole thing worthwhile (assuming that's what they use it for).

  44. not very practical by gasgesgos · · Score: 1

    but it could be used when world war 3 comes around.. just shrink it a bit and it'd make a good, basic calcuator.. that or just find a solar calculator, or maybe one with batteries. its a very interesting project, but it would really have few real world applications... speaking of old calculators, my grandma gave me an old mechanical calculator, you slid some dials around using a stylus and it figured stuff out. it could even do multiplication and devision, if you had a lot of practice and patience.

  45. my god, I cannot spell by gasgesgos · · Score: 1

    the word is DIVISION... so dont kill me, k? i do know how to spell it find the error in the following sentence: One word in this sentence is Mispelled.

  46. so many youngsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why logic gates? you can go straight to integration and computing outcomes of complex systems using water in analog circuit - some uk bunch did it back in the 50's or so for modelling the economy - and was used for such - and was still better at numerical answers for the problem until well into the 70's.

    1. Re:so many youngsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, okay! You know about analog computation. Sheesh. Yes, I bow to your schlong.

  47. GEEEZ /. users are morons! by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 5, Informative

    How can people argue about this for so long!?!? If you really know nothing about chemistry, don't post about it.

    Oxygen is element 8. It has 8 electrons. 6 of them are valence elecrons (in the 2s and 2p orbitals) and 2 of them are "core" electrons in the 1s orbital. Only the valence electrons get drawn in those dot diagrams, that's why you can only see six on some sites.

    Hydrogen is element 1. It has 1 electron. This electron is in the 1s orbital.

    Water is H2O, where the 2 is subscript. It has 2 hydrogens and one oxygen, with polar-covalent bonds between them, so there are 2*1+1*8=10 electrons. Two of them are in oxygen's 1s orbital, four of them are in two of oxygen's four sp3 hybrid orbitals, and four of them are shared between hydrogen's 1s orbital and the other two of oxygen's sp3 hybrids (one orbital and two electrons for each hydrogen).

    Don't even get me started on sp3* anti-bonding pairs.

    Sorry for being inconsistent as to whether numbers should be spelled out.

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    1. Re:GEEEZ /. users are morons! by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      ok, dude , you get karma your way and the rest of use can get it our way. Jeez.

    2. Re:GEEEZ /. users are morons! by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      I have M2 and my karma has been maxed for a long time (note my use of +1 on that post), so it's pretty safe to assume that I'm not a karma whore. I just get really pissed off when Slashdot users can't decide how many electrons there are in water, and the argument thread runs 4-deep.

      I wish you could mod things (-1, wrong).

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    3. Re:GEEEZ /. users are morons! by packeteer · · Score: 2

      You are right but it doesn't even matter if they can decide how many total there are. There are no orbitals with one free electron so it wont conduct.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  48. Log gate implementation by matman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if it would be possible to create such gates that function on water pressure changes. It's quite quick to propigate a wave through water. I'm talking about pressurizing water inside of the system, and then inducing shock waves from your inputs. Could you make gates that trigger on those pressure changes? You could probably get quite a few bps (by creating shock waves in the water) I wonder if you could just use plain old speakers to generate sound waves... I wonder what the attenuation characteristics of water are.

  49. It's a four-bit adder... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    "ripple" carry, so to speak. What did you expect, carry-look-ahead?

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  50. another problem by merriam · · Score: 3, Informative

    a not gate: an xor gate with true -- ie a constant stream -- applied to one input

    an or gate: an and gate with not gates at each input and output -- or just join two streams with a simple junction

    A recycling system is easily added. A more fundamental problem is that the gates are passive: there is no amplification. You can use gravity, but with feedback some lines will have to go upwards and need a complex pump for each line. Also you may need a lot of height per stage.

    Fluid actuated valves would solve this problem, and would be more efficient. Only one pump would be needed -- as in electronics -- to provide the supply pressure. But in the simple case of a four-bit adder, it might be harder to make.

    1. Re:another problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also use an AND gate in this setup to amplify the amount of water along a signal line.

  51. macroscopic objects as computers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The neat thing about this is not the speed, but that it can be applied to almost any sort of material you can imagine...o ther liquids or even billiard balls crashing together before going into pockets. I think the point of the article is that basic logic gates can be imitated by macroscopic objects, which for a lot of people are much easier to understand than electrons and voltage drops in a circuit

  52. Only digital water logic, why not analog too by obiwan2u · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Why not extend the metaphor...

    Inductance is the same as momentum. You could build a gadget that has a turbine in the water flow with a fly wheel attached. The gadget would resist water flow starting up, and would resist the water flow slowing down once it's moving. (same as an inductor fighting a change in current)

    Capacitance is the same as a flexible membrane across the pipe, which will transmit AC changes in pressure, but not DC.

    You could build a capacitor/inductor tuned circuit that either filters or passes certain frequency water waves

    Also, water transistors should be fun. A small flow or pressure of water controls a larger flow or pressure (in either an analog or digital fashion)

    It would be a way fun tool for teaching electronics.

    --
    Ben in DC
    "It's the mark of an educated mind to be moved by statistics" Oscar Wilde
  53. water... cool! by SlugLord · · Score: 1

    How amazingly creative. It's just too bad the latency is probably on the order of seconds, otherwise this could seriously be used for a great many wonderful things.

    I suppose it can still be used for a great many wonderful things, just a lot slower. I want a water-based binary adder on my desk.

    I thought the xor was particularly clever, particularly how a single gate can be used to calculate both (a xor b) and (a and b), out of the pipe at the top of the gate.

  54. Maximizing processing speed by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Every time I try to overclock it, all the circuits freeze up.

    We're thinking of giving up on liquid nitrogen and trying liquid helium.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  55. Not very original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have been explaining logic gates for years with pipes and water. This is nothing new.
    Been there done that. Hey lets get a patent !!!!

  56. Old News. I was doing this when I was 7 years old! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    Note the logic gates.

    Many equations were solved with that fine machine.

  57. Looks like it would be faster with... by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Funny

    better pipelining.

    1. Re:Looks like it would be faster with... by mh101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      and a 133 litre per second FSB...

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    2. Re:Looks like it would be faster with... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      266 double-pumped.

  58. Sheeeeesh. by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 2

    Slashdotting and UFie-ing (This was selected as the UF link of the day today), both at once.. shame, shame...

    --j0shua

  59. too flashy by hfastedge · · Score: 0

    I think that this guy should really see that water is just an example of a material transmitting information using electrostatic repulsion as opposed to electrons.

    And because of this, its ineherently going to be slower. Not to mention the awkwardness of a system of this.

    I said similair info wrt the micro-micro computers a day ago http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=43239&cid=4527 661

    --

    -- -- --

    Help my mini cause: My journal

  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  61. Overclocking by jacobjyu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine overclocking this baby.. just hook it up to Hoover Dam and you'd be able to run Quake3 easy.. but then again, you better have a monitor with a water input.. and a keyboard and mouse with water out

  62. Not quite computing yet, just digital logic by McCart42 · · Score: 1

    This is very cool for those of us who recently took digital logic/computer organization courses in college--the scary thing is that for some simple logic devices, provided the "water logic components" didn't leak, I can see this being as easy to use as a breadboard and traditional logic chips.

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    1. Re:Not quite computing yet, just digital logic by Al-Hala · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about this is, I saw production hydraulic valves using this very technique over ten years ago (switching fluid/air streams at high rates without moving parts).

      I guess there really isn't anything new under the sun:)

  63. 'or' in one gate by merriam · · Score: 1

    Just join the two inputs to the output in a simple Y-shaped junction (as here).

    As the AC said, "Trust me, this is easier than it seems." :)

    Xzzy's solution is rather more complex than necessary too: he made the same simple or gate, but didn't realize it, and then used it to make (a xor b) or (a and b)

  64. oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I tried running setiathome on one of these, but all that number crunching made the CPU too hot and it evaperated...

  65. Better keep the temps down by racerx509 · · Score: 1

    When you overclock it, it boils away.

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
  66. gain by gargle · · Score: 2

    But there's no gain.

  67. a water adder by drDugan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a friend of mine in college (Aron) made a water adder capable of adding two 8-bit values -- all with water streams.

    LINK

    1. Re:a water adder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow; 6 years ago too. I wonder if the MIT folks knew about it.

  68. In the Boston Science museum by Flamesplash · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the article states this is currently on display in the main entrance to the Boston science museum. it looks really darn cool but it just sits there, no demonstrations or anything. I think they are afraid any actual usage will break the thing. :/

    Here's a better image of the contraption

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:In the Boston Science museum by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 2
      I think they are afraid any actual usage will break the thing.

      If this is the thing I saw some time ago, and it appears to be, then the reason it is not used is very cool... It doesn't work anymore!

      You may ask, "How is that cool?" Well, it turns out that the through time the tension on the rubber bands changed and some of the wood warped subtly. The machine started to give incorrect answers. I guess that is the pre-computer equivalent of letting the magic smoke out.

  69. Actually in Russia by WetCat · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... water analog computers have been used since 1949... till mid 80-x for modelling differential equations.
    They were used for large-scale projects, such as modelling of water dams.

    1. Re:Actually in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using water in your models would seem ideal for making dams.

    2. Re:Actually in Russia by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 3, Informative
      In the London science museum they have an analog water computer that represents the British economy. I believe it predates 1949. I am not sure how accurate a model it was, but it cant be much worse that the digital model they have now.

      Reseach shows the more higly qualified an economist is, the poorer his predictions!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:Actually in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for attracting beavers

  70. Soon? by Pan_God_of_Gods · · Score: 1

    can you imagine "yeah earl my new dell's got a 50 psi pump! this baby flys!"

  71. Another Slashdot repeat? by Chagrin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Didn't we just have a different "font" article?

    --

    I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

  72. Wind Logic Exists as Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US military I know has used wind logic instead of digital logic to guide missiles. Doubt they really bother with that much now but back in early '70s it was something they messed around with since they are immune to an EMP blast (guess they wouldn't work to well in a vacuum though :-P)

  73. Imagine a beowulf cluster of those! by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

    Would it look something like this?

    --
    Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
  74. Re:Imagine the size ... by mh101 · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean two? The first one, that came up with 42, then Earth (sorry, can't remember it's "official name" ;), to determine the question?

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  75. water and computers CAN mix by slavik · · Score: 1

    distilled water doesn't conduct electricity (no ions besides the H and the OH), you learn this in chemistry in HS. the idea is nice though, the problem would be making lots of them on a molecular scale

  76. Jonathan Jonathan Jonathan, uh sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a water computer in the original RollerBall movie, I vaguely recall.

    (so did the computer)

  77. Mirror by loupgarou21 · · Score: 1

    here is a mirror to the site

  78. Fluid Computing has bee around awhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remeber a friend of mine showing me some article he found about fluid computing a long time ago, the 80's and it was dated in the 60's I think.

    They had AND, OR, XOR, flip-flops. Whith those you got just about eveything you need. Yea i know there are other thing, but once you get the basics you can make anything else you need.

  79. Yeah, they claim to have water computing now... by Mark+Garrett · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... but I bet that in a few months, it'll all just turn out to be vaporware.

  80. DNA Computer by Zoop · · Score: 2

    I remember reading an article (possibly in Scientific American or Science News) about making a DNA computer and using it to quickly solve the trip planning problem. It seemed a very cool hack but a long way from being practical.

    On the other hand the speed of molecular reactions and their ability for massive parallelity (is that a word?) sounds like it would hold promise for certain types of computers.

    This of course would leave Steve Jobs to insist that his MISC computers were much better even if they were a terahertz or so behind current Pentiums.

  81. Fluidic logic has been around for decades by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    Fluidic logic has been around since the 1960s. It's often used in industrial process control. It works for both air and liquids. Most industrial systems use air logic, but automatic transmissions often have fluidic logic running on hydraulic fluid.

    The MIT students didn't quite get it right. Their gadget doesn't seem to have gain. The key insight needed for fluidics is that a jet of fluid can be diverted with a smaller jet coming in from the side. This allows building a fluidic amplifier.

    Once you have an amplifier, you can do switches, gates, flip-flops, and other logic elements. Analog control systems, with fluidic sensors and amplifiers driving pneumatic or hydraulic cylinders, are also possible. When the inputs and outputs are pneumatic or hydraulic, it's often convenient if the control system is, too. Fluidic elements are very reliable, too - there are no moving parts except the working fluid.

    One wierd fluidic application is this kosher public address system.

    1. Re:Fluidic logic has been around for decades by xyote · · Score: 1
      It was written up in Scientific American ages ago. At least one company manufactured the fluidic logic components. It works based on the Bernoulli effect. A flip/flop would be a Y fork with a micro port at right angles on each side of the junction. The water stream would stay on one side of the fork due to the Bernoulli effect. To switch it, you pulsed the port on the side the stream was on and it would switch to the other side.


      I seem to remember that one inkjet printer used fluidic logic. It had a constant ink flow that was recycled thru one side of the gate, and when it wanted a ink drop, it would temporarily swith to the other side of the gate which went onto the paper.

  82. I believe the word you are looking for is... by blackwizard · · Score: 1

    "parallelism"

  83. linux port yet? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    no linux port to water yet?

    Would Apple sue for the use of the phrase, AquaLinux?

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  84. Built in . . . by seangw · · Score: 1

    Built in Water Cooling!

    Do we heat it up to move faster and prevent freezing??

    Could we build a water computer on top of a standard computer, and leverage the heat dissipation from one to aid the other??

  85. The Bay Model by bgspence · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Bay Model in Sausalio is a huge water based analog computer. Check it out at the army page or this VR view.

  86. finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    now if i'm ever too busy coding to piss, i can just fill the computer up..

  87. Speedlimit to these gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you increase the pressure, it might go out the sides. Remember waterjets are used to cut even metal. http://www.howstuffworks.com/question553.htm

  88. Dude, you're gettin a Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. how long until we see a computer constructed using bong water?

    Hmmm, that annoying guy would seem more appropriate

  89. Do you know what happens... by yuggoth · · Score: 1

    ...when a water-powered computer dumps core?

    --
    Cthulhu fhtagn!
  90. This gives a whole new meaning... by root_42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...to the term core dump!
    I wonder if this machine also has an overflow bit!?

    --
    [--- PGP key and more on http://www.root42.de ---]
  91. Analog fluid calculators by haggar · · Score: 3, Informative

    (I say "calculators" because I think that computer is underrated).

    I have studied about these machines at Uni (I studied in eastern Europe): they use fluids and analog pseudo-circuits to create things like integrators, adders etc. and are capable of solving systems of differential equations in real time. This kind of equations is still a non-trivial problem for digital computers.

    However, with the advent of gigabit-clocked CPUs, these machines are definitely out. Their models are, sometimes, replicated in software, though.

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:Analog fluid calculators by haggar · · Score: 2

      sorry, s/gigabit/gigahertz/

      --
      Sigged!
  92. Proofreading? by stygar · · Score: 1

    Myself, I would've read things over before I posted my project page for the world to see. Or does he really think it's spelled "envoroment"?

  93. Water? by Thowllly · · Score: 1

    They should have used ants...

  94. Water? Bah! Use cows! by richie2000 · · Score: 2
    I believe it was in the book Lord of the Files (William Golding would spin in his grave if he knew how many schoolkids misspell HIS book) that I read about a mad scientist building the game of Defender using cows milling through an intricate system of pens and gates spread out over several acres of farmland. The gates were wired and the inventor had an array of light bulbs as the display. You have a friend in the business, indeed. :-)

    Ohh, I just found another quote from the book that I once used in a software manual:

    Prestel screen-dump, ASCII string,
    Punched tape reader, Token Ring,
    Matrix output, raster scan,
    Printer sharing via LAN,
    Transputer network, thirty mips,
    Configured in the moonís eclipse.
    ROM-based firmware, network nodes,
    User-friendly input modes,
    Duplex transfer, RISC machine,
    Jump to user subroutine,
    Write it to a backup file,
    Press return, compile, compile!
    - Ray Girvan and Steve Jones
    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
    1. Re:Water? Bah! Use cows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've got this story (possibly abridged) in a scifi anthology "Digital Dreams" (edited by David V. Barrett, ISBN 0-450-53150-3, fairly old so might be unfindable for all I know).

      Also has some other cool computer-centric scifi stuff in (including Virus by Neil Gaiman, and #ifdef DEBUG + "world/enough" + "time" by Terry Pratchett). Mine is well-thumbed, the stories are varied and enjoyable.

  95. Performance by jonv · · Score: 1

    Should have great floating point performance :)

  96. 1936 Water Integrator photo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.zzz.com.ru/67.html

    (scroll down for the photo)

    Looks like what you'd expect of a hydraulic net that can do integral calculations.

  97. An early example of water computer by jesus_watkins · · Score: 1

    In 1949 Bill Phillips created the Phillips Economics Computer also known as a Financephalograph. Which simulated economics conditions using water.
    See the following links for more info.
    http://www.inc.com/magazine/19950915/2624.html
    http://www.nzpca.org.nz/megabyte/2001/02/art02.htm

  98. An 80s research fad. by obnoximoron · · Score: 1

    Fluidics for computation if I remember right was a hot topic in the 70s and upto mid-80s. Its pathetic how research fields become bandwagons on to which clueless young researchers jump to, just because it was advocated by some 'big shot' at Berkeley or MIT or a technology 'guru' from the Media Labs. Anyways, the fluidics-for-computation fad died a quick death in the 80s but fluidics still remains important in the instrumentation field to say the least. Like for integrating tons of chemical sensors into an integrated circuit. A whole bunch of alternative computation technologies are making a comeback or becoming new bandwagons now, though. Check this list of a whole bunch of alternate computing ideas: http://lists.canonical.org/pipermail/kragen-tol/20 02-April/000706.html

  99. Liquid Helium by Rodolfsk · · Score: 1

    Why not use superfluid helium? Only restriction on speed would be the durability of the materials used. You could overclock till your computer explodes due to centrifugal forces and suffocates you in the proces. (deja-vu: limit of CD-ROM drives)

  100. Everything old is new again by jemenake · · Score: 1

    I recall reading an article in Scientific American about 15 years ago where researchers, working on some island somewhere, had unearthed remains of some boxes with strange inner workings. They eventually figured out that they were boolean gates to be used with *rope*. For example, the "AND" gate would have two ropes going in and one coming out. The mechanism inside was such that, if you pulled on both ropes, it would cause the third, outgoing, rope to get pulled. There were other boxed for OR gates and I don't recall if there was one for XOR.

    The striking thing is that the article gave the impression that the island had been inhabited by a bunch of tribal villagers... kind of an Easter Island kinda deal. So, it was kind of interesting to think that, with enough rope and boxes, they could have turned the island into a huge calculator.

  101. Water Computing -- Been There, Done That by el+bid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hasn't anybody heard about the Phillips Machine, used for computing national economies?

    The BBC has just done a radio program on Bill Phillips' invention. You can still hear it on

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/electronicbr ai ns.shtml

    --
    el bid

    --

    --
    el bid
  102. Rap Video Pool party by butt-rock+camaro · · Score: 1

    I need to build a cluster of these things. Then I could set it up with tons of babes in skin tight bikinis like one of those circa-1995 rap video pool party scenes. We could call the women "research assistants!"

  103. This is an really old idea... by amentia · · Score: 1

    just read the comic in "the hackers dictionary" - the printed edition of the jargon file.

  104. Hydraulic Computers: already done, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Haven't there been hydraulic control systems already for very many years?

    The way that Op Amps work is mirrored by the way that hydraulic elements work. Op Amps can be used to make transisters, and thus so too can hydraulics. Transisters are used for computers.

    This is not news to anyone who has studied computing.

    And just as a point: Of course a water computer uses electrons. H2O has two electrons from the hydrogen and 8 from the oxygen. So each molecule uses 10 electrons. You can't get away from using electrons.

  105. This is old! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't new.

    Fluidics for computarion has been around since the 1960s. The US armed forces were very keen on the idea since these types of computers would still work during an electromagnetic pulse. All you need is a continuous supply of fluid (air, water, whatever).

    Detailed logic circuits were built, but the size a fluidic computer needs to be to be useful is enormous. No one wants computers that are 50 feet by 50 feet.

    It's much more cost effective to use a normal computer and build shielding around it for EMP protection.

  106. Been there, done that by ibm1130 · · Score: 1

    I guess they don't make the handy, dandy little
    Junior Fluidics set one of my MechE course labs had
    back in the 70's. Still extra credit for effort.

  107. Bugs in your flow by slabberman · · Score: 1

    ... and then use this streaming rice as a powerful debugging and monitoring tool!

  108. Keynes by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The idea predates the electrical computer. In the 1930s John Maynard Keynes had a water computer that was used to construct a model of the British economy. The computer stretched over a large country mansion.

    Konrad Zues' Z1 and Z2 machines were built somewhat later but used many of the same ideas, only in a much more compact space.

    Of course now we will have a bunch of idiot libertarians blasting Keynes. However Keynes and his computer are the reason why Britain pulled out of the depression before the war while in the US depression turned to slump. The problem came when Keynsianism became an idelology after his death, the solution to every problem was deficit spending, just like today some idiots think that the solution to every problem (including a deficit) is tax cuts.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Keynes by Squareball · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      The solution to avoiding deficits is to not spend more than you have. The gov't wants MORE and MORE every year.. and a lot of it is pork. The only way to support this habit of spending is to take more and more from the tax payer (in their minds) but in reality you generate more revenue to the gov't when you cut taxes. JFK knew this and so did Reagan. the more money people have the more money goes into the economy. Even if the people are taking that pay check and putting it into savings and not spending it, it's still going into the economy because it's not like that money is sitting in a vault some where, it's being invested through the markets. we are headed for an economic disaster though in the US. the top income erners are pay way too much tax and at some point this is bound to collapse at the way it's going. The lower income erners (the largest percent of people) are being taken off the tax rolls and the burden of welfare programs and being shifted to the rich. The class warfare tactics are working as well. You hear "The working family" all the time, but what does that mean? to these class warfare people, you are only a working man/family if you make less than x number of dollars. so to them the rich dont' WORK for their money, they just use and exploit people. I'm sure that these rich people don't wake up every day and sit on their asses. So the only difference between them and the "working man" is that they make more money.

    2. Re:Keynes by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what your rant was about, but it didn't seem to have much to do with Keynes.

      I'm Libertarian... If the government would follow Keynes actual advice, and only maintain a deficit during times of extreme economic downturn, and promptly pay the debt back, I wouldn't have a problem with it. That's not how it works out though.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Keynes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The solution to avoiding deficits is to not spend more than you have. The gov't wants MORE and MORE every year.. and a lot of it is pork. The only way to support this habit of spending is to take more and more from the tax payer (in their minds) but in reality you generate more revenue to the gov't when you cut taxes. JFK knew this and so did Reagan.

      Horse huckey. You listen to WAY too much Rush Limbaugh. The slash taxes folks and the Reagan faithful have conveniently forgotten that at the end of the Reagan years, the US had the largest deficit in it's entire history. Although he later whimped out, Bush the elder was exactly right in the early 80's when he declared Reagan's "trickle down" theory as voodoo economics.

      The conservative message hasn't changed since Reagan and it's just as idiotic today as when the Gipper first dreamt it up. Case in point: The spendthrift Democrats had a multitrillion dollar surplus at the end of the Clinton years, and the current "fiscally responsible" Republican president has frittered that away on a moronic $300 per person refund transforming that huge surplus into a huge deficit in a matter of two short years. So I ask you, which model seems to work better? Tax and spend (Democrats -> massive surplus) or Spend without taxing (Republicans -> massive deficit)

      [snip]

      the top income erners are pay way too much tax and at some point this is bound to collapse at the way it's going. The lower income erners (the largest percent of people) are being taken off the tax rolls and the burden of welfare programs and being shifted to the rich.

      You need to expand your reading list beyond the spoon-fed conservative pablum you've been reading. The income gap between rich and poor has been increasing steadily for the last 30 years. This isn't some liberal massaged-numbers plot, it is a fact. The discrepancy isn't because the non-rich are lazy or are working less, it's because the rich have been given more and more ways to hoard their loot.

      This is an admittedly extreme example, but comparing the wealth of Bill Gates with the median household income in the U.S. ($50,000/year) yeilds a ratio of 1,189,810 : 1

      To put that number in perspective, the wage earners in a typical American household would need to have made $50,000/year since they were australiopithicenes to equal what Mr. Bill has.

      A more down to earth example is someone who earns $1,000,000/year only has to work 3 years to earn what the average household does in 60. I don't care how amazing a person might be, there are damn few millionaires who's contribution to society is so great that it warrants paying them what most Americans earn in a lifetime of toil.

      The class warfare tactics are working as well. You hear "The working family" all the time, but what does that mean? to these class warfare people, you are only a working man/family if you make less than x number of dollars. so to them the rich dont' WORK for their money, they just use and exploit people. I'm sure that these rich people don't wake up every day and sit on their asses. So the only difference between them and the "working man" is that they make more money.

      Live in denial if you want, but the rich ARE given advantages and opportunities that the rest of us are not. Take the stock market, there is a rule in place that restricts those with account balances of less than $25,000 from making more than 5 trades in any given stock per week. Those with more than $25,000 could make 100, 200, 300 trades per week if they choose. It's a rich boy privelege that purposely excludes those of lesser means.

      How is this a problem? Well, someone above the cutoff point could buy 5000 shares make 3 or 4 five cent gain trades per day and end the week $3,750 to $5,000 richer. The small guy would have to hold out for 500 percent returns to earn the same amount. So while the rich guy can chug along week after week piling on the cash, the little guy has to clutch his 100 shares and hope for a bolt from the blue 500 percent miracle. And this is only a drop in the privelege bucket.

    4. Re:Keynes by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      > The idea predates the electrical computer. In the
      > 1930s John Maynard Keynes

      *cough* mechanical computer *cough* charles babbage (1791-1871) *cough* difference engine (1851) *cough* ada lovelace *cough* etc

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  109. How to Overclock your water computer::: by jhampson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Add a scoop of Maxwell House.

  110. We already did that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hydraulic computing was a real field for a while. It was reasoned that hydraulic computers could function in places that electronic computers would not survive. There was even a company in Pompano Beach Florida that sold hydraulic computers to the government. This branch of computing seemed to be a lot more reasonable a few decades back when electronic components were unreliable.

  111. Not that new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after reading the post i remembered a brochure from the German technical museum in bonn.

    a quick search in their exhibition catalog brought this up:
    http://www.deutsches-museum-bonn.de/exponate/flu id ik/exponat.html

    (sadly, it's in german)

  112. Wait till you see the SQRT function by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    That one should make you all wet. And all you need to implement floating point math is a bunch of small round balls floating in a bucket. Wouldn't want to be around to see a core dump.

  113. Hmm... by Digital+Prophet · · Score: 1

    Andrew_Cronin writes "This is a nice project that some one did at MIT on building some logic computation systems without using electrons.. So why not use water..."

    I don't know... I guess water would work... it could I guess... hey, do you notice... anything strange about my speech...? I have been told that I trail off a lot... and that it is really annoying... to read...

  114. This was very popular to do in the late 1950s. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was for a short time a period in the late 50s when people were trying to do serious computing with fluidics. Considering the size and cooling issues with tubes, that was not as odd as it now seems. Much digital fluidics was done; my father was well into it briefly, but when transistors appeared most of the interest disappeared.

  115. The tech industry goes down the drain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No electrons? Are you positive about that? ;)

  116. Bit bucket by stackdump · · Score: 1

    Hmm, the only way they could implament storage would be.... ice cubes!

  117. Water computers-useless information by panurge · · Score: 2
    An Australian once built a water analog computer to describe the Keynesian economic model (Republicans-don't ask) at, I believe, University College London. I think I heard recently it has been restored. Anyone know about this?

    Back in the early 80s, a colleague with aerodynamics experience built a device without mechanical handling parts for sorting pills based on fluidics. The inputs were amplified to the point at which they controlled air streams which moved the pills physically, the Bernouilli effect causing them to fly over the track like hard disk heads and so avoid contact damage, until a contrary air stream braked them as they landed in the output bins. The management got a demonstration, it worked perfectly, but guess who was first out the door when there were layoffs?

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  118. Everything old is new again... by tlambert · · Score: 2

    When I was a kid in school, one of the teachers found an old book on fluidic computing in the school library, and built a one bit adder, using stoppered flasks and glass and rubber tubing.

    Old Singer sewing machines had fluidic computers that they used for switching systems.

    Rocketdyne built a fluidic missile guidance system.

    The Russians used fluidic computers back in the late 40's, early 50's.

    Actually, if you do a patent search on "Alvin Snaper", you will find a number of fluidic computing patents (and the patent for the IBM Selectric ball).

    -- Terry

  119. Water logic and nuclear engineering by XNormal · · Score: 2

    I found an old book from the 50s about water logic on my father's bookshelf. He was an argriculture engineer that worked on advanced irrigation systems. I especially remember the flip-flops - they were actually simpler than the logic gates and consisted of a simple bifurcation of a water pipe. The water flow would tend to cling to one side or the other and could be flipped by a water pulse perpendicular to the flow.

    In the 50s, nuclear engineering was in vogue. Water logic was perceived as the ideal solution for the control logic of nuclear power plants. Electronic components would fail too quickly because of the intense radiation.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  120. without using electrons? by zanedp · · Score: 1

    The write-up says: without using electrons

    That's not right. Water has electrons.

  121. Re:Very good - Binary Logic Table by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    > A xor A=1

    Might want to re-check your math. That should be zero.

    Here's a handy table to refer to which I've partially reproduced below, but in proper (ascending) binary order. You can do this enumeration to build truth tables for tertiary logic, and higher.

    Notes:
    1) Don't mind the table seperators - had to find some way to get around the /.'s gay lameness filter(s).
    2) To lazy to fill in the names for '?' ;-)


    A B | 0 N ? A ? B X R | r x b ? a ? n 1
    ----+ ================ ________________
    0 0 | 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
    0 1 | 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 | 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1
    1 0 | 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 | 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1
    1 1 | 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 | 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1

    0 = Hardwired to false
    1 = Hardwired to true
    N = AND
    A = Value of A
    B = Value of B
    X = XOR
    R = OR

    And the negates in "reverse" order:
    r = NOR
    x = XNOR
    b = Negate B
    a = Negate A
    n = NAND

    Funny thing is, I first saw this table in one of my Logic books!

    This Electronic Truth Tables describes some of the un-named ones.

    Cheers

    --
    Funny Lameness filters:
    That's an awful long string of letters there.
    Please use fewer 'junk' characters.

  122. Good trick if you can do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fluid logic is old hat, but I'd be interested in how you make water without electrons.

  123. I know this is old,but by Associate · · Score: 1

    Water Gate

    Geez I crack myself up.

    --
    Someone hates these cans.
  124. F-14 by maitas · · Score: 1

    As far as I remember, the F-14 use to have a fluid computer in case of a nuclear explosion (mainly becouse of a Phoenix air-air missile lounched by the F-14), so if the EMP fried the computer, they still could fly the plane (althoug without any avionics).

  125. The Great Quux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its dependence upon gravity is a weakness when wanting to design recursive circuits like a J/K (or other) flip-flop. Would the XOR/AND gate still function when fed with water under pressure, or would it produce OR/zero instead?

    I'm surprised at the lack of references to the Guy Steele's Crunchly cartoons on the Water Powered Computer manufactured by Bells & Whistles, such as the Floating Point Unit having bits of cork floating in it as the "points" and the core dump flooding the computer room.

    A pity I can't find them anywhere on the net to cite them; I only have them in my commercially bound copy of "The New Hacker's Dictionary" (The Jargon File itself doesn't have them).

  126. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    There is is no reason for any individual to have a computer in their home.
    -- Ken Olsen (President of Digital Equipment Corporation),
    Convention of the World Future Society, in Boston, 1977

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...

  127. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    When we understand knowledge-based systems, it will be as before --
    except our fingertips will have been singed.
    -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...