Slashdot Mirror
Slashback: ClonesMAX, Animation, Dislaimers
Give me IV any old day. Rupert writes with a review of the newly IMAX-ified Episode II of the Star Wars saga:
"Since it was my wife's birthday today, last night I took her to see Star Wars: Episode II: Attack of the Clones: IMAX edition. Notwithstanding the overuse of colons, this is a movie worth seeing, even if you think you already saw the movie.If you haven't already seen AotC, you no doubt have your reasons, and there isn't anything in this edition to make you change your mind. Likewise, the plot still has gaping holes and Anakin is still moody, so if those were enough to make you hate this movie, you won't want to see it again. The action sequences gain little from the new presentation, as objects move too fast across the large screen to follow.
On the other hand, if you want to see the pores in Natalie Portman's skin, or the individual hairs in Christopher Lee's beard, this is the movie you've been waiting for. I suspect that some time was spent re-rendering the digital characters. Yoda, Wattoo and Jex Dexter stood out in close up, looking more real than the human actors.
Some scenes were cut from this edition. Some I didn't miss, such as Ani and Amidala frolicking in the meadow with the giant bed bugs. Others, such as almost all the scenes in Palpatine's office, and many of the Jedi Council made it even harder to follow what was going on.
You might be wondering where you can see the movie."
Always cut with the Groenig.
ari_j writes "It looks like Fox is giving us a new season of Futurama. From the page, "Season Premiere Sunday, Nov. 10th at 7PM/6C". Sure enough, my local Fox affiliate is carrying it as stated. From tv.yahoo.com: '"Crimes of the Hot", Episode #408.
Al Gore's head holds an emergency summit in Kyoto, Japan, to deal with global warming caused by robot emissions.'"
This does not look good on a resume. nautical9 writes "As a follow up to Henrick Schon's dismissal from Bell Labs last month for falsifying data, many of his former co-authors are retracting their articles from the AAAS's prestigious Science magazine. It's apparently the largest retraction for the journal ever. Bell labs is also pulling six different patent applications of his. Here's the Wired article."
Is this the basket you ordered for all your eggs? With regard to the AOL / ICQ integration CowboyNeal mentioned the other day, nxtw writes "At this moment, ICQ users can send messages to AIM users, but AIM users cannot send messages to ICQ users or be seen on your buddy list. However, AIM automatically postpends any screenname or group consisting of all numbers with -ICQ when added to your buddy list. (This applies to the beta AIM 5.1.3009 client.)"
They're in Australia, of course they have flying dreams. VileScum writes "Back in May a reader posted this story of an Australian Guy who built a 747 Sim in his garage. As reported in the Sydney Morning Hearld The builder and a group of his friends are now doing a round the world sim flight for charity. The full story can be found here. The details of the actual flight can be found here."
jim konecny is a faggot!
jim.konecny@stisd.net
weee
goat!
My views and opinions are different than those of the majority. Therefore I deserve to be modded up. Thank you.
Was that meant to be "disclaimers?" Or is that a word meaning the opposite of "lamers?"
:)
In that case, I am NOT a "Dislaimer." Look at me, pointing out typos...
Note that the "new" season of Futurama isn't quite new... The show is still just as cancelled as before.
Fox just has a few un-aired episodes that were produced a while ago, but still haven't been shown yet.
With the formerly-missing musical number, "Blame Amidala."
n/t
AIM and ICQ are both owned by AOL. ICQ is the original IM. And at one point was the most poular. There have occasionally been UNIX knockoffs, like the vastly inferior command line "talk" implementation, however it was incapable of letting you know whne new users had signed on, also, it could not do file transfers.
Programs like Trillian, that do what the author of this article suggests have been having a difficult time lately because they steal Yahoo, AOL, and Microsofts intellectual property, in an attempt to make money. It's like companies like Kazaa and Gnucleus that make money off of other people trading files. It's illegal. And not a good idea.
This is just AOL doing what is best. They saw a duplication of effort in their own company and decided to stop it. I would bet that a lot more people would use Linux if Open Source programmers would wake up and realize that they also are (most of the time) duplicating effort. Gnome and KDE are but one example. Just search freshmeat for an mp3 database organizer one day, and you'll see what I mean.
see? now that's funny. not like that stupid "Step 1: blah blah Step 2: ???? Step 3: profit" garbage.
You really can't miss them in this version of the movie. I bet half the re-digitizing budget went into that scene alone.
So...as far as I can tell, this edition removed all the political intrique and vague sense of plot, poured in more closeups of scenes we already either liked or hated, and ruined all the somewhat fun explosions and action scenes by running things so fast acrost the screen you can't see them?
If there's one thing wrong with movies today, it's the frame-rate.
With Futurama, I feel that folks just simply didn't appreciate what they had until it was gone.
And considering the timeslot that the FOX TV network placed it into, how could it not fail back then?
Either way, let's just hope that this time it's very successful. Please try to buy all of the products that they advertise. Also if you can start fan pages for Futurama and sell merchandise of Futurama logos at CafePress.com. That's what all the big sites do.
Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
I would have to agree with the submitter. Yeah it was nice to see a few of the things larger than life, but motion blur was much more noticeable and I was miffed that they cut scenes out of the movie. During the drive back home me and my girlfriend spent more time talking about why they might have cut scenes out of the movie instead of talking about the "incredible IMAX experience".
Maybe you should educate the morons of tomorrow so they'll stop believing the leaders of tomorrow. - Dogbert
With multiple AIM accounts and an MSN account, the search for a program that would let be run all at one time was ended. I tried trillian,but I didn't like that as much as aim. On the other hand, I tried Gaim and enjoy it. Gaim makes it easy to manage accounts,msn, ICQ, Yahoo, AIM, and more.
Gaim is open-source and has some features (automatic logging of conversations) that I have not been able to find elsewhere. Try GAIM, its well worth it.
***OK, well the gui is made with GTK, but the features are rich***
It is!!!! LOOOOOOLZ!
Now that's +1, Informative!
Just a refresher, ICQ was invented in Israel by two gentleman who later sold the thing(y) to AOL.
AOL did nothing with it, but now they will?
What I hope to see come out of this: One network which has all the users, AIM and ICQ. The ICQ client with some additional features that newbies can't/won't use, AIM for us who don't want 'groupware'.
AIM is great. IMHO, AIM is the best client out there. Not because of the features but just the ease of use. ICQ was nice back in the day but when you just want to sit back and wait for buddies to pop into cubicals or dorm rooms: it's AIM.
Features? Why do you need all those features in most clients anyways? Not that I'm knocking the feature set on ICQ or another client but sometimes you just want 'buddy' to 'buddy' chat.
Fuck it, either way if it's a blow to Microsoft I'll bite.
And BTW; we just got a new IMAX theater which was partly built with public funds... but dammit, not AoTC! Hate me, fine, I liked it.
Get your Unix fortune now!
Now that's +1, Insightful!
...all the weenies on the big SW newsgroup are cumming their pants over it.
Absolutely. talk/ntalk is part of the original Unix networking application set... you know, those applications everyone forgot about and then disabled with their firewalls.
It is amazing to me how many "new ideas" are just the same old thing rediscovered. That alone doesn't bother me. It is that they don't remember the past that most irks me. That dooms us to repeating the same mistakes rather than improving on the original.
Whether it be IM, or the semantic web, its all been done before.
It's understandable that they would retract the articles, but why pull the patent applications? It's not as if any one at the USPTO is going to notice a little thing like falsified data.
I'd sell the patents to one of those outfits that collects submarine patents and then uses them to extort money from small companies.
Notwithstanding the overuse of colons, this is a movie worth seeing
Not worth seeing is another misuse of a colon - a link which I would recommend against visiting to those fortunate enough to have escaped seeing it. Please don't click on the link, but allow the unfortunate of us to laugh knowingly (and nervously, with nausia at the memory).
You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
Note that the "new" season of Futurama isn't quite new... The show is still just as cancelled as before.
Fox just has a few un-aired episodes that were produced a while ago, but still haven't been shown yet.
...must've just been envious of how this poster pointed out that typo before anyone else did. Funny how non-AC posters get modded up for pointing out these sorts of things. Oh well... flame me, call me what you want... I really don't care.
How can the CGI characters be more life-like than the actors?
If you skim the review about the IMAX Star Wars movie too quick like I did you may only pick up on quotes like:
"Since it was my wife's birthday today".
"Notwithstanding the overuse of colons."
"the plot still has gaping holes."
"Yoda, Wattoo and Jex Dexter stood out in close up"
"Ani and Amidala frolicking"
http://www.kubuntu.org/
Soon after AOL bought ICQ they made it run on their own proprietary protocol. Until recently it didn't let it interact with AIM, but now they have opened that up.
. . . . because they steal Yahoo, AOL, and Microsofts intellectual property, in an attempt to make money.
.No Advertisements! . . . . while certain corporations and **AA associations would like us to think otherwise is not stealing intellectual property . . .
My understanding is that Trillian, Gaim, and Fire were developed using standard reverse engineeing methods to duplicate the protocols required to communicate with services from Yahoo, AOL, and MSN. This is not stealing intellectual property, and Trillian Pro aside, considering Trillian is available free of charge and that Gaim and Fire are both GPL, I would venture to say that there is very little or no money being made.
Combined with the fact that you need a valid ID regestered with your choice(s) of IM services. . .
If you want an analogy. . . using an alternate IM program is like skipping commercials on a Tivo or ReplayTV . . .
You'll be free, hackers, you'll be free.
Join us now and share the software,
You'll be free, hackers, you'll be free.
Hoarders may get piles of money,
That is true, hackers, that is true.
But they cannot help their neighbors;
That's not good, hackers, that's not good.
When we have enough free software
At our call, hackers, at our call,
We'll throw out those dirty licenses
Ever more, hackers, ever more.
Join us now and share the software;
You'll be free, hackers, you'll be free.
Join us now and share the software;
You'll be free, hackers, you'll be free.
There! Wasn't that just great?! Plz mod me up, I luv teh Lunix and RMS! He's so coool! Geddit?!
Slashdot covered "AOTC" here
You moderators mark him as funny, but he has a point. Modern movies show in 24fps (most theaters double-shutter, so you get an effect 48 fps, but each frame is doubled). This is extremely noticeable on any pan. And before anyone jumps in with the, "Human eyes can only see 24fps anyway, so what's the point?" argument, let me just say you're wrong wrong wrong. 24 frames per second is near the bare minimum required for the human eye to distinguish motion rather than individual frames. I've never seen a study claiming a maximum value, but I'd expect it to be much higher than even the 60fps some people suggest. If that were the case, then nobody would be able to tell the difference between 60Hz refresh rate monitors and 100Hz refresh rates. Movies can get away with this because of intrinsic "artificats" like motion blur, that help create a better sense of motion in fewer frames. (Incidentally, that's also why 24fps in a video game feels really jerky, while 24fps in a movie is usually pretty smooth -- video games tend not to have motion blur, because it requires lots of computational power. It's easier to push out more frames for a smoother look, rather than add motion blur.)
Will we ever see > 24fps in the movie theater? Possibly, but it's going to take some time. I wouldn't expect it until TV broadcasts have switched completely to 720p (60 full frames per second, not 60 fields or half-frames), and DVDs are encoded at the same (rather than the current 480i encoding, and relying on special hardware to do 3:2 pulldown conversion for progressive display). Until then, the 24fps movie is too entrenched, I think.
I think this sums up the concept pretty well. Fanboys, start your fapping!
Since Bell Labs is pulling some of it's patents because they were based on bogus work, I wonder how many other companies submit patents BEFORE they fully know whether the idea works or not. (I do understand that they need to get them before someone else does, but I think they should have an idea if it's going to work.)
Yoda, Wattoo and Jex Dexter stood out in close up, looking more real than the human actors. There's a shocker.
Moderators with no sense of humour, I see. It's a joke, people. I marked the link and warned against clicking on it!
Sheesh.
You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
It's subjective and the content pertains to an even smaller subset of /.ers, of which those whom subscribe to slashdot are already of a small amount of net folks.
IMHO of course,
AC
And they laughed at my snackrifices to El Chupa Negre!
This guy is way out there
Check out gortbusters.org!
I thought this was awesome... hot damn, I am stoned off my ass right now and so this post is the funniest fucking thing I've seen in a long while.
Good work, Jedi.
Another AC made the same point and DIDN'T get mdded down.
Spelling mistakes are always laim, especially in the titles.
Or is it the shotty writing?
Never before has it been so hard to tell which part of that movie was the shittiest.
I suppose if you look at it as a 2hour commercial for George's hardware and special effects... then it ain't so bad.
--Noodles
It was her birthday?
Perhaps for Ep III they can develop cameras that will have the same resolution as the renderer that they use. (Maybe something like a digital IMAX, which doesn't exist to my knowledge)
wayner@pobox.com -- Wayne A Arthurton -- www.pobox.com/~wayner
I have gaim installed on my proxy server where I can ssh over and run it through x tunnelling if I need to direct-connect with an aim user.
It also supports my HTTP proxy server in Linux on my iBook. I would like to see iChat compatibility routines to support some of iChat's extra features like image/file transfer from behind a proxy.
All in all, open source source software whips close source to the ground. We seem to be playing 'catchup' for that one feature (grammar check for abiword *cough*) but upon closer inspection our products are better (excel at school can't edit an older excel db in place).
You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
This exact post is right above you, at +5 Informative.
YHBT, YHL, HAND.
Suckas.
Showscan, a format used for ride films and
other LBE, used a frame-rate of 60fps.
I've heard anecdotal evidence that it was
`too real' for the cinema experience.
I haven't seen Showscan myself but I have
seen those annoying artifacts of the low
frame rate of regular cinema which occur
on pans across certain types of detail
and action.
"Yeah well
I got back from seeing AOTC in an Imax dome (very cool!). I sat about just shy of the half way mark and found myself needing to turn my head to see all the action. I recommend that you sit at the top so the center is 10 to 15 degrees below your horizontal eyeline.
The Coruscant chase was made for IMAX!
Oh, and if you have friends that still haven't checked out this awesome flick, you may want to show them the DVD first (Nov 12). Because this movie is not exactly straightforward anyway, and with the cuts, they make the story harder to understand.
--Joey
[Trillian] wouldn't be worth using if someone wrote a Win32 native GUI for GAIM. Too bad GAIM wasn't started on Qt...
Homework: Port Kinkatta or Kopete to Windows.
Will I retire or break 10K?
You can check out Episode #404 right here.
--It's Pimptastic!--
Bitching about moderation is a sure sign you're a weenie. Not the good kind of weenie, either.
When you post a link to goatse, how can you expect not to get moderated as a troll? Surely you were aware of the risk there.
Now please relax and enjoy the show.
--
the strongest word is still the word "free"
And may football go the way of Tlatchli (the Aztec game with the I-field and stone hoops). Baseball to, it interfered with Enterprise quite a bit last year at least.
...Episode II. Besides Natalie Portman (yum) am I missing anything? Heck I didn't even see Episode I until many many months after it hit the theaters. There were only a handful of folks in the audience. Wait, maybe that was opening day...
I saw it a few nights ago here in Calgary, and have been meaning to write up a review. Seems I was beaten to it... Aside from the cuts, there's a few things that readers have thus far failed to mention.
First, while I was worried about the digital transfer on the far larger IMAX screen ("pixels as big as fists pummeling your eyes!") the picture looked very nice and clean, with a couple of exceptions. On the very rare occassion, very thin lines that are close to horizontal or vertical get a distinct case of the "jaggies", where one can see the staircase effect of pixelisation. (This is most evident during the Lucasfilm logo at the opening and at a moment during the descent of Senator Amidala's ship to Corsucant).
Second, the sound is incredible. Those who haven't heard a well-tuned theatre - and IMAXi are amoung the world's best - will get a kick out of that aspect of the movie alone.
Last - a traditional IMAX movie focuses on vistas - grand sweeping praries and the like - and where Episode II is most like this, it works very well. At other points - closeups of actor's faces, in particular - the IMAX image can be too revealing, much as the higher resolution of HDTV is acknowledged to reveal the flaws of those appearing on television. There are other scenes - that of Anakin next to the Jawa sandcrawler while searching for his mother on Tatooine, for example - that the framing of the scene is just "off".
To those intending to go, I would recommend arriving early and getting seats near the center of the theatre, for the most compelling experience - again, big vistas work well from most any viewpoint, but not head-shots. For me, it was more than worth the price of admission.
Just sit on your ass and wait a day. Duh.
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
I saw Star Wars IMAX on Saturday and didn't know until the end of the movie that they had removed the scenes. I seriously thought I had lost my mind after the library scene with Obi Wan was missing. Then after the dumb scene in Naboo was missing (the CG sucked) I thought I had fallen asleep or something! It made me crazy until I found out what happened!
Unstable Apps: Our Android Apps Don't Suck
"flicker" like you see with A CRT or (I guess) movie is caused by the screen going from black to colored over and over again. You notice the change.
You don't notice flicker on things like LCDs because there is none. There is a 'frame rate' but the screen doesn't go black between each image.
Interestingly, I've never really noticed flicker at the movies even though the screen blanks only 48 times a second. 24hz flicker would be really obnoxious though.
Also, I can see flicker on a 72hz screen while moving images on it seem silky smooth.
One interesting effect of having a high enough frame rate is that you can actually see 'motion blur' with static images, for example with my old monitor I could do 640x480 at 120hz. Some 3d graphics would appear to blur as they moved, just like objects in the real world. You could probably produce some cool visual effects that at 120-200fps in a film. would be impossible at lower speeds.
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
Regarding the IMAX movie, does anybody know what scenes exactly were cut, or was it just little things here and there?
Regarding the ICQ/AIM "merger," who the hell cares? Honestly, I don't know one perosn that I've met in real life that uses ICQ. And in this day and age, who cares what platform you're using? Programs like Trillian can use them all at once, and you'd never know you were connecting to completely different servers!
And when you think about it, it all boils down to the users. What's the difference between AIM, ICQ, MSN, and Y!? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. Just the subscribers. I know, I have AOL/TW as much as the next, but I don't have any qualms with using their servers and eating their bandwidth while chatting on Trillian without ads!
Check out CML, the cinematography mailing list. There this has been a holy war for many years.
Many believe that the higher frame rates of video subconsciously tell us that something is "real" and that good ol 24 fps film tells the subconscious: "You are watching a story"...
--
Is that all there is to relationships -sex and robotics?
However, the scroll at the beginning looked like it was going straight up a wall, which was kind of cool. :-)
They killed it.
I was never really a fan of ICQ. The interface was horrible, and way, way over designed. The company's business model was 'give away the software, charge for the manual' and I think it affected their design decisions. You shouldn't need a 450 page manual for IM software.
The UI design was atrocious, and the system itself was pretty insecure, even by windows user standards.
Anyway, that's beside the point. People still used it, and it can take a long time for people to migrate from crappy software to software that doesn't suck. (just look at how long people used MacOS 6-9. Look how many people still use Netscape 4)
But by AOL buying ICQ they locked up the IM market, and killed innovation in ICQ. I don't think ICQ would have ever innovated, but they could have. And by AOL purchasing it they were able to get a strangle hold on the market... Until M$ decided to bundle MSN...
So it made business sense, although it didn't really benefit the world.
Personally, I really wish some open standard would replace AIM/MSN so that we can use any software we like.
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
And only at 1000p HTDV resolution. That might look nice on your TV at home, and it might look nice in a standard movie theater, but the fact is that's pretty low res for movies. It's lower then regular 35 millimeter film.
OTOH, all they had to do was re-render the digital graphics at a higher resolution, which as someone else who's also seen it, seems to think they did.
If they had filmed this on regular film, or at, say 5 or 6 megapixles, you wouldn't have felt that way.
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
I missed the part about dissing lamers. Can someone fill me in?
Since it was my wife's birthday today, last night I took her to see Star Wars: Episode II: Attack of the Clones: IMAX edition.
I recommend counselling. Seriously. By all means, see the film, but for your wife's birthday?!?
'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
The reason you can see flicker on monitors running at 60Hz is because the phosphors on modern displays decay very quickly -- they are designed to decay in time for a high-refresh display running at 85Hz or higher. Use slower phosphors, and 60Hz is flicker-free as well, but you get a bit of a "motion blur" if objects move across the screen very quickly.
The maximum that the eye can see is considerably higher, but it isn't a constant fps. It depends on what part of the eye is being used, the intensity and color of the light, the ambient light in the room, how dilated the pupil is, which specific receptors you inherited from your parents, and many other factors.
Hilarious. Also, where's the "YHBT" moderation option?
I kinda thought that's where we were going with this. Having somebody go "around the world" has different meanings depending on the context.
Yes, I have a wonderful wife. I say this with particular feeling right now as she is basking in afterglow and I'm posting to Slashdot. She understands my needs, see?
--
E_NOSIG
Whats wrong with text protocols? Seems to work fine for http, smtp, ftp and everything else on the 'net these days, except telnet.
Ease of implementation == good. we have tons of bandwidth, and chatting dosn't take much of it.
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
Jeez... The guy can build a frigging 747 simulator in his house but he can't resist using... The BLINK tag! ...
There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
So, that's what I do at work.
It's pretty cool. There are some really large unsolved problems with it though - the biggest is that it's really tough to detect when objects go in front of each other (occlusions). If you don't detect them correctly, then you get really bad results. Of course, you can do things with a little human intervention, which lets you get almost perfect results, but the time that that takes is proportional to the number of source frames.
That's why you see those kind of effects for slow-motion (in Lost in Space or the Matrix) which has relatively few source frames, but I doubt we'll see it any time soon to increase framerate in movies, because 24fps for a whole movie is a whole lot of frames to manually tweak.
Powered by Web3.5 RC 2
Go ride Soarin' Over California at Disney's California Adventure. Really neat.
"I suspect that some time was spent re-rendering the digital characters. Yoda, Wattoo and Jex Dexter stood out in close up, looking more real than the human actors." :)
Now, this I could belive. If you have watched the trends in digital imaging, the cameras today are already at the resolution limit of the lenses. Take for example the 2 biggest: Canon 1Ds & Kodak 14n, they are already shotting at 11 & 14 megapixels! Now, maybe I am wrong, but you are going to need seriously expensive glass to go with that resolution.
So, the reason why real actors will look fuzzy and CGI generated will look super-sharp is that Mr. Jackson Puss has gone through 8-15 pieces of glass, while digital Yoda only has gone through... ugh, probably none. May Pixar programmers should add lens fuzzyness to the sunlight flair and other defects?
The theater I went to is a part of a furniture store. Yes, a furniture store has a 3D IMAX theater!
The best part though was the vibrating seats whenever there was an explosion or other low-bass sound... That and the seats were made from Tempurpedic material, so they were ultra comfortable.
Actually if you sat directly on the northpole, you would have a very cold ass touching every longitudnal line so you would 'go around' the world forever.
--Joey
Did anyone bother to click on the link in the parent post? It's a prank -- there is no UPN story. Yes, I fell for it and got my hopes up. Please mod it down so nobody else does.
However, lens flare would look horribly out of place in a first-person shooter, IMHO.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
--Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
#ifdef SLIGHTLY_OFFTOPIC
However, super 8 at least allowed you to edit your films.
20 years later, it seems we're finally getting back the ability to easily edit film/video footage again at a reasonable cost. Why did 8mm film die when consumer video cameras had this horrible flaw? Pr0n (the home-made stuff) striking again?
#endif
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
--Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
Heh.
It's either *AA or ??AA. **AA is completely redundant. :)
I can also tell you why bash is better, vi is the one true god, and how you can avoid the useless uses of cat.
The interpolation software used to generate the extra frames is bad - it introduces bad digital artifacting and makes the whole picture a mess. Speak to any TV professional and they'll tell you that 100hz technology is an abomination designed only to get people to buy new TV's when they already had a perfectly decent one.
-- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
reading this i just had a moment of clarity(tm)... when i was a kid, i always wondered, why they would draw the northpole as a red-white-striped stick stuck in the earth(/snow) in american comics and cartoons. in german the northpole is called Nordpol and Pol doesn't have anything to do with a pole (like in stick). it is more like the pole of a magnet. just another miracle solved...
*phew* i'm growing up, me thinks...
the computer is online
i am not at it
what a waste of ressources
Shouldn't that be "dislamers"? Actually, that might be a pretty handy term of art on /.
Scott
I think that the real problem with 60 Hz. is flourescent lighting. Practically anything looks better than a screen which is being redrawn in sync with the (otherwise unseen) 60 Hz. flourescent lights.
I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
Well, I'm speaking from a my own point of view and experience here. My 100Hz TV with Digital Natural Motion looks awesome imho, I couldn't care less about what other people think, or try to tell you.
However, I am aware that normal 100Hz TVs suck. There is no real point in going to them, apart from a reduced flicker, as they can also introduce scan line artifacts and suchlike. Digital Natural Motion gets around this problem.
Here's an interesting bit of information for you: I have a friend who works in a TV store. He changed stores recently, and they don't do anything with 100Hz TVs in his new store (it's a small store). He is under strict instructions to tell consumers that 100Hz TVs are utter crap and should not be bought, this is to keep consumers buying their crappy 50Hz non digital natural motion TVs.
Moral: never trust salesmen.
There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
Slashback: ClonesMAX, Animation, Dislaimers Dislaimers != Disclaimers
So THAT explains GoatSe.cx Guy. . .
/*
* Oops. The kernel tried to access some bad page. We'll have to
* terminate things with extreme prejudice.
*/
die_if_kernel("Oops", regs, error_code);
-- From linux/arch/i386/mm/fault.c
- this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...