Slashdot Mirror


Kite Aerial Photography

SethJohnson writes "People have been attaching cameras to kites for quick-and-dirty aerial photographs for almost a hundred years. Hobbyists have progressed the art far beyond it's quick-and-dirty origins to produce stunning results. NASA even has a fairly detailed how-to using a disposable camera. Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids."

183 comments

  1. Quick and dirty! by the_other_one · · Score: 4, Funny

    Over the nudist beach!

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    1. Re:Quick and dirty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, this sounds like an incredible boon for the paparazzi.

      Surely it's much less obtrusive than hiding in the bushes. Plus it must give you a far better chance of getting away from any nearby bodyguards should they realize what it is that you're up to.

    2. Re:Quick and dirty! by rmohr02 · · Score: 2

      Wide-angle or zoom lens?

    3. Re:Quick and dirty! by the_other_one · · Score: 4, Funny

      Both

      1. Wide angle for targeting

      2. Zoom lens for...

      --
      134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    4. Re:Quick and dirty! by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 3, Funny

      2. Zoom lens for... sausages?

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    5. Re:Quick and dirty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...close-up of pussyhair!

      Don't lie. I know that's what you meant!

    6. Re:Quick and dirty! by augros · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wouldn't that be kite aerial pornography?

    7. Re:Quick and dirty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... Would it be wrong to mod up a comment only because the sig is funny? Definitely a good example of what /. humour could be.

    8. Re:Quick and dirty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had actually been there once, you'd know that nudity is nothing to go nuts about. The body is not pornography, shameful or anything. It's just the way it is. It may be difficult for many people to accept their body as it is, but you should pity them. They tornment themselves and hide their secrets over nothing. There are even people who believe nudity is immoral, such is the extent of the pervertedness in our society.

    9. Re:Quick and dirty! by fyonn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wide-angle or zoom lens

      while I've never done KAP, I have flown kites before (ie, big kites) and you need quite a big kite to hoist a decent camera. the reason disposables are so often used is because a) they're cheap and b) they're light.

      the kind of camera's that have zoom lenses are heavy beggars, and how do you control the zoom? wires? remote control? thats all more weight. now a big power/traction ktie can carry alot but it's hardly secure.

      with a light camera you can tie it down so that as long as you keep the kite steady then it should be good. with a heavier parcel then the weight will be harder to tie down as although a bi kite can undoubtedly take the weight, it's all concentrated in one spot which is bad news for a parawing style kite.

      you can of course use something like a big delta too, but they are harder to carry around.

      I'm no expert a KAP though, I have to admit, I did some reading on it a few years ago but never tried it. some of the KAP images I've seen in the last have been pretty stunning though.

      dave

      PS. current kites: pbsk warrior and VP (favourite 2 line kites ever flown), spirit of air omega xs, elliot ekko 2.8, revolution EXP (would love a speed series one day, esp if resailed by peter betancourt), a nice Rok and a few others

    10. Re:Quick and dirty! by plover · · Score: 2
      while I've never done KAP, I have flown kites before (ie, big kites) and you need quite a big kite to hoist a decent camera. the reason disposables are so often used is because a) they're cheap and b) they're light.

      How about c) they're disposable.

      I have a team Hawaiian (well over a pound) that would seriously cause injury to any victim standing beneath it in a power dive. And it has shown that it is perfectly capable of dragging my 200+ pound butt across a plowed field.

      While I believe it would have no problem hoisting my old Pentax with its hefty ancient Tamron zoom lens (3 pounds total camera+lens weight) I'm not sure I'd want to risk either damage to the camera or to any innocent bystander if either should decide they suddenly want to drop from the sky.

      Also, if I were to duct-tape some kind of jury-rigged timer to a camera, it'd be nice if someone else had to clean off the duct-tape glue when I was done with it. :-)

      --
      John
  2. nifty! by MoceanWorker · · Score: 4, Funny

    now all i need are a couple of hot models to move in next door and sun bathe naked for test objects and i'll be good to go!!

    oh wait.. that's the whole purpose of my roof ;-)

    plus it's november.. so i guess i better put this idea off..

    --


    "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
    1. Re:nifty! by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, there's a thin line between "Score:5, Funny" and "Score:-1, Pervert".

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    2. Re:nifty! by MoceanWorker · · Score: 2

      heh.. i just got all "excited" when i read this article..

      wait.. that didn't sound right..

      --


      "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
    3. Re:nifty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Six points isn't a very thin line.

    4. Re:nifty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you must understand, Rolo, is that there is no line.

    5. Re:nifty! by ayjay29 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No wonder geeks have a hard time getting laid...

      Model 1: We've been here nearly an hour. I'd have thought he'd have poped round to introduce himself. Whats he up to?

      Model 2: It's hard to tell, he's running round franticly trying to fix something with a bin bag, some sticks and a piece of string.

      Model 1: Just our luck, we've moved in next door to a System Adminidtrator.

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    6. Re:nifty! by 1DarkZen · · Score: 1

      I thought there was no spoon....

      --

      "If Diet Coke did not exist it would have been neccessary to invent it." -- Karl Lehenbauer
    7. Re:nifty! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean zuul.

    8. Re:nifty! by z99.99Az0* · · Score: 1

      Baby so true, I just got a promotion here at work and this computer asshole said, what kind of work are you gonna do?, you don't do anything. By good luck and the grace of the Maya Chohan I was replying to him, you know if my boss tells me to jump off a cliff, I'll do it, then I saw a look of fear coming from him, and it was because one of my little administration angels was just passing by, serves him right.

  3. Return Policy... by Quaoar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a feeling many cameras will be returned to the store for "spontaneously fragmenting."

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
  4. Cool: Kite flying will be hip again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bow! Bow! Wow! Bow! Wow! Kite flying will be hip again.

  5. Re:Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    you mean areola photos?

  6. Our friends Laura and Chris... by 955301 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So I assume someone has done there duty and that Laura Betterly and Chris Connell are signed up for the Kite Photography mailing list? :)

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  7. I've done it... it's easy by AntiPasto · · Score: 5, Informative
    Check out my house! This was done with the LASS system... VERY satisfying hobby, and I encourage more to do it! Kite stability (an oxymoron for those who fly kites, as the fun is that they go all over) is really key. The line has a lot of vibration, and it can be scary seeing your investment bobbing around in the sky, or heading for the ground!

    Those along waterfronts know that daily patterns of onshore and offshore breezes can aid in getting good wind.

    Brooks Leffler pioneered the art with a magazine (!!!) that he still has back issues of. He even sells stabilizing tails. The most stunning pictures in my opinion have been by the vastly-experienced Chris Benton... he inspired my finally getting into this. $100 for the kite, $80 for the camera, $100 radio+misc, and you're up and going.

  8. I'v alwas thought that this was an amazing Idea by outofpaper · · Score: 1

    For as long as I can remember I've alwase thought that this was a cool idea but somthing that I thought would be also realy fun was sailboat cameras. While not as use full they would be tons of fun you would be able to take picutres of your family on the beach, of other boats in Central Park's pund, and for my all time favorite, if you removed the mast you would be able to send your camera on a boad tied to a string down the sewers to take pictures of aligators.

    1. Re:I'v alwas thought that this was an amazing Idea by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      if you removed the mast you would be able to send your camera on a [boat] tied to a string down the sewers to take pictures of aligators.

      Most likey you will just see a bunch of rotting shit. Better use monochrome. And, give up the idea of retrieval. I wouldn't want to touch it after that.

  9. Figure 9:test picture by LittleBigScript · · Score: 1


    ok, I'm done laughing. But that has to be the funniest looking picture I've seen in awhile. It's like looking at someone's family album.
    "That's your Uncle Bort."

  10. balloons? by orangeaaron · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how about a timer-controlled camera on a helium balloon. it could take a picture every 10 seconds or something... the only tricky part would be getting the camera back after it had floated off. maybe you could promise whoever found it that you would send them reprints :)

    1. Re:balloons? by AntiPasto · · Score: 2

      A lot of people use ballons (or blimps) for similar low-altitude pictures. Helicopters and remote control airplanes... whatever coincides with your other hobbies ;p

    2. Re:balloons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tie a string to the balloon you retard.

  11. Scary by dolo666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't want to think about all the lawsuits that could arise from a curious kid with a camera on a kite! *shudder*

    1. Re:Scary by jimson · · Score: 3, Funny

      .....*shudder*

      You mean shutter......

    2. Re:Scary by zambotsu · · Score: 1

      At least in Finland you would have to watch out. If you photograph a person standing on his/her private yard without their permission, you're quilty of illicit viewing with the maximum penalty of one year in prison. (They'd propably just fine you for that, but nevertheless.)

    3. Re:Scary by dolo666 · · Score: 2

      STOP THE PRESSES!
      Every movie star in the world should move to Finland! Safe haven from the public eye! :)

  12. dad ==> kid by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...for those dads out there with kids.

    As opposed to... ?

    --
    example.org - powered by Linux!
  13. My god, you're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Terrorists in our own backyards!! We must immediately ban kites and imprison kite owners without trial. God only knows what these religious fanatics were trying to survey before destroying. I'm glad we caught them before they actually did something. God Bless America.

    1. Re:My god, you're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you kidding? This let's you see right into your neighbor's yard! what a great tool for surveillance! We can use this to FIND TERRORISTS!!

      Get your kites up boys, we'll find those rag-heads yet. Everyone is suspect!

      Get off your computer and SPY ON YOUR NEIGHBORS!

  14. Welcome to Slashdot by headbulb · · Score: 1, Troll

    We even take down government sites.

  15. Sounds all well and good... by Rayonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but how will all those cameras affect Charlie Brown's kite-eating tree? I'd imagine they're not too healthy.

    Okay, that wasn't funny. It's late. Night night.

  16. Nevermind my browser must be on crack by headbulb · · Score: 1

    Looks like its up. My oops

  17. Introducing.... by tevenson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember when you used to play wargames as a kid? Now you can do it with your very own Spy Satellite.

    "Now you'll know all of your enemies moves; where they're keeping the water ballon stash, how many they have, and if that teenage girl in the house across the street is sun bathing topless again."

    1. Re:Introducing.... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Remember when you used to play wargames as a kid?

      Yeah, my big brother always made *me* be the grenade. I especially hated it when he pulled my "pin" out.

  18. Dads with kids? by Dylan2000 · · Score: 1
    Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids.
    What about all those dads without kids?

    oh...
    --
    Build your own website - full service homepage system your m
  19. Estes Rocket by SirCrashALot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is/was an estes rocket that did this. Two of my friends had them... One never recovered the rocket(typical of our launches) and the other pictures came out great!
    It's not as controlled as a kite, but you get great landscape pictures.

    1. Re:Estes Rocket by AntiPasto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I looked into these, radio controlled airplanes, and others. Kites are a) very cool b) very broad in design c) what spawned aircraft. It's also fairly cheap combined with the amount of control. You can go up to SLR cameras (any may do) and I've seen enough sadness in my dad's RC plane buddies to know that losing a plane *and* a camera would be devistating. Kites of course need wind, and in lack of wind there's always balloons, but I felt in my study of all of this that it was less risky than other low-altitude photography.

    2. Re:Estes Rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, i had one of those as a kid. Fascinating how it worked. You put a small camera in the nosecone with a parachute. You send the rocked up. When the engine burnt out, a small explosive charge blew the nosecone off, which floated down to earth with the camera pointing down. A small mercury switch and RC timer made the camera go off around 4 seconds after maximum height.

    3. Re:Estes Rocket by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 2

      I had one of those as well. It did a good job. Really need to find the pictures. I still have the rocked all ready to go. It's been launched a few times. I forget the details about it since this was ages ago. I seam to remember the film being some wacky formate, so that could be a problem.

      Ah yes model rockets, experaince being nasa. they explode, go off course, don't work, catch a breeze and go a mile off course. get the wings on wrong the spiral at you. shoot them with the wind at 45degrees and never see them again. Also the branch hobby from this rocket powered anything else. Rocket boats were fun. Those engine work under water to. Seeing your boat go under water and a glow then pop up out of the water like a missile from a sub is fun to.

    4. Re:Estes Rocket by MsWillow · · Score: 2
      Actually, Estes used to make a movie camera called the "Cineroc". You can see both of them here.

      I always wanted them both, but never had the cash. By the time I had the cash, they were gone :(

      --

      Lemon curry?
    5. Re:Estes Rocket by clockmaker · · Score: 1

      Disposable Cameras on: Kites? R/C Planes? Rockets? Balloons? Bush League. When I grow up I want a Dragan Flyer III microprocessor-stabilized R/C helicopter with web cam (see their commercial site at http://www.draganfly.com)

  20. Priceless.... by ball-lightning · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nice Kite: $100 New Digital Camera: $400 Crashing it into the ground on your first try: Priceless (And thats why I don't even try ;) )

    1. Re:Priceless.... by fyonn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nice Kite: $100

      $100? hohoho, spot the guy who doesn't fly em :)

      if you're making it yourself then thats 10 times too much, and if you're buying a nice kite from a shop then thats not enough :)

      my pbsk warrior standard was over $300, although, to be fair, thats a damn nice kite.

      if you're talking commerical parafoil's (ie the ones that look like james bond style controllable parachutes) then really you're talking up to and over $1000 depending on how big and what make, although the second hand market can get you some good deals, my best friend recently bought an 11.8 metre (yes, metre) wipika waterkite for a few hundred quid

      dave

    2. Re:Priceless.... by CharlieO · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice Kite: $100

      Not if you get a good quality proper kite, maybe if you buy from Toys 'R' Us. A Revolution 1.5 or FlexiFoil 10 is around 200UKP/300USD - course these arn't great for KAP, but its what I fly currently and serves to show that kiting is not as cheap as you might expect (cos you go and get kites for different conditions and challanges) but it is serious fun :)

      New Digital Camera

      And thats why people use simple 35mm autowinders, or cheapo all in one CMOS digitals to start with.

      Crashing it into the ground on your first try

      And thats why you practise until you become and expereinced kite pilot before you take up KAP to extend the enjoyment of your hobby.

      Seriously you'll find the kite is probably the most expensive part of the rig.

  21. Kite, we don't need no stinkin' kite by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 1, Redundant

    We've sent our little 35mm's up to 112,000 feet! try that with a kite!

    1. Re:Kite, we don't need no stinkin' kite by CharlieO · · Score: 1

      And you can see how much from that?

      Seriously, the goals are different, rocketters want to get pictures from as high as possible, KAPers generaly want to get a usable aerial photograph.

      I've been involved in both, and RCplanes and Ballons - the goals and challeneges of each are different but just as much fun.

      And FYI there are people who fly single line kites on 'deep sky reels' at 4 miles or so. Now thats pretty incredible.

  22. Scenario 46 by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    "Okay, I'm getting a signal now. Wait. Is this a screen-saver image?
    It looks like an under-water sce.......DAMN!"

  23. Kite are advancing by stonezone · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Kites have become the sport of choice lately, not only with photography, but with wakeboarders, surfers and skiers. Take a look at the popularity of kitesurfing on water and snow. Kites have evolved a long way in 20 years, from paragliders, to leading edge inflatables that relaunch when you drop them in the water.I have heard that guys are getting 50m high and 30sec air on skis now in the alps, and here in hawaii, kitsurfing in the winter surf is pretty nuts. Guys around here have been flying kites over the waves to take photos for at least 5 years, although rarely.

    huh?

    1. Re:Kite are advancing by Eightlines · · Score: 1

      Yeah the technology has really been advancing quickly lately. I fly with one guy who built shock absorbers into his kite to take the buffetting of the wind out of the sail. He can also perform Stunt Kite Ballet like you've never seen. Puts new meaning into aerodynamics.

      Some of the aerial photography rigs even have GPS onboard. And about a year ago Richard Synergy broke the Kite Altitude record out in Kincardaine, Ontario. (No flight paths are in this area) Some people are even mentioning this idea of using kites as a renewable source of energy by gathering static electricity (which increases every meter off of the surface of the earth)

      So yes, the advances are happening rapidly, but no, kites aren't all sport. For the home scientist they really are a cheap and effective way to get good altitude data.

  24. We don't need no stinkin' kite! by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 5, Interesting
    We've sent our little 35mm's up to 112,000 feet! try that with a kite!

    High Alt Balloon Group

    1. Re:We don't need no stinkin' kite! by AntiPasto · · Score: 1

      That is truely amazing! I've thought about balloons for days when the wind was not blowing. They could be just as easily controlled as kites. Every do much hobby at all, or you just mainly scientific? Either way, it sure it cool.

    2. Re:We don't need no stinkin' kite! by Tottori · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. That ruled.

      --
      use constant PERL_IS_BROKEN => $] >= 5.006;
    3. Re:We don't need no stinkin' kite! by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is entirely a hobby for us, everyone is 100% volunteering for it, most of us do it for the thrill of the chase! (imagine the Twister scene, looks about the same...) We do carry scientific missions also, most recently upper atmosphere mercury sampling.

      Wind doesn't matter too much, the balloon isn't tethered, and has gps and radio telemetry on it for recovery. EVERY package except for #1 has been recovered, and that one was more of a platform test/throwaway anyway.

    4. Re:We don't need no stinkin' kite! by mstyne · · Score: 2

      At the risk of a -1 Redundant, thanks for the link. That was really interesting and very cool. And ... on topic!! Surely this spells the end of Slashdot!

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    5. Re:We don't need no stinkin' kite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's not the altitude that is important in KAP. Most practitioners of KAP fly well under 500 feet and the really interesting pictures are taken below 200 feet. As KAPers we are not trying to take pictures that can be used for geological surveys, but pictures that show objects and scenes from an unusual perspective. The majority of KAPers are use KAP to produce artistically pleasing photographs, some have even won photography contests competing against ground-based photographers.

      For those not interested in KAP for its artistic merits, KAP is being used in archeology, in the earth sciences as a supplement to satellite images to resolve finer details, to help study plant and animal habitats, and as a tool for crime scene investigators.

      KAP is definitely a nerdy endevour. For the most part all equipment is made by hand and involves a modest level of mechanical and electronic skills

      David Hunt
      Editor, KAPER

  25. You sexist pig! by updog · · Score: 2

    Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids.

    What about all all of those moms out there with kids? Are they not allowed to geek it out too?

    1. Re:You sexist pig! by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      Naah, us chicks can geek out too. We just can't go mentioning it here on SlashDot, or we'll get responses like this one... (grins, and goes back to compiling ALSA)

      AAACK! I MENTIONED GEEKING OUT! ;) OK, start the barrage ;)

    2. Re:You sexist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could geek it out by scientifically deducing the equilibrium between meal flavour and cooking time, for those hard working kite flying boys! ;)

    3. Re:You sexist pig! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's updog?

      oh I get it.

    4. Re:You sexist pig! by newmarkb · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you weren't trying to be a sexist pig, but.....

      Many of us (by "us" I mean women with or without children) also like to fly (rockets, kites, airplanes, whatever) and take pictures. We teach others who have an interest and share our insights with those that care to listen.

      Do not exclude an entire population that just may have something to teach you, too!

  26. Re:dad + mom == kid [various] by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    How about moms?

    You didn't say "dads with sons" so presumably being old and female is the handicap? I went to school down the road from MIT and met plenty of women gifted with the geeky arts. ;-)

  27. how about X10 by lingqi · · Score: 5, Funny

    real-time video feed from kite

    sure is a lot cheaper than a remote control helicopter. =)

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:how about X10 by AntiPasto · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup! They do it too! ... of course not x10 specifically, but still cool. What is nice is using video through the view finder (or close thereof) to get better still photos from the camera on the rig.

    2. Re:how about X10 by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This guy has some interesting info & footage.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    3. Re:how about X10 by fthomas64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a great idea! But... how do I learn more about X10 products? I sure wish they had advertisements that showed up while I was browsing the web. Curses!

  28. Re:dad == kid by GrimSean · · Score: 1

    What the... Hey! Science Fair Projects are for the KIDS to do! The KIDS! Not the DADS! jeez, you don't want to raise a cheater, do you? (Besides, everyone knows mothers do better work....)

    --
    I don't need to be made to look evil. I can do that on my own. - Christopher Walken
  29. Re:dad == kid by scott1853 · · Score: 3, Funny

    As opposed to... ?

    A pimp-daddy.

    You know the pirates around here do some slave trading on the weekends. Gotta supplement the ol' VCD business in order to support that luxurious case-modder lifestyle with the $400 a month video card habit.

  30. Re:bugger it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm, you might try using filler chars such as periods,,, really though don't be a dipshit, we all know that really long lines (like 400 periods in a row without spaces) will break /. so just be a nice troll and use reasonable judgement and normal length lines, we all (at least most of us) enjoy a good troll song, so I decided to help you out, but please don't be an ass, just troll and be happy.

  31. Re:dad == kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dads whose kids are DEAD, you heartless BASTARD!

    Timmy.. where are you timmy.. daddy's here.. *sniff*

  32. why not have an 802.11b camera?? by rveno1 · · Score: 1

    What I plan on implementing is a wireless 802.11b camera/camcorder hooked up to a kite.

    here is a link to one vendor who currently supports offers the 802.11b camera
    http://www.dlink.com/products/DigitalHome/DigitalV ideo/dcs1000w/

  33. And I thought they could get a patent by wiresquire · · Score: 2, Funny

    for the predator BTW, I wonder if anyone's attached an Hellfire to a kite?

    --

    So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

  34. Don't you mean... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 3, Funny
    *shutter* ?

    1. Re:Don't you mean... by dolo666 · · Score: 2

      For a split second I thought I had mixed them up. *THEN* I got it. :)

      You made me open word and check the damn thesaurus!

      *shutter* [sic(k)]

  35. Interesting Rigging for Stability by AntiPasto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most interesting is the rigging! This suspention reduces flopping about as the whole thing would have to lift and spin to tip sideways. Ingenious! Although, a very old idea...

  36. From a kite flyer by MxTxL · · Score: 5, Informative

    I run a kite site and am fanatical about the sport, so i should hope to have a little authority on the subject. While i haven't done any KAP myself, i've read extensively on the subject. There are some amazing photos coming back from people lofting cameras on their kites. There is also some interesting tech going into the works too. I've seem plans for radio controlled microcontrollers that will depress the camera trigger, hold it till a beep for the camera to focus, then press the trigger harder to take the photo. There are setups using small video cameras and transmitters that allow the user to see what he's about to take a photo of. There are a bunch of pan-rotate-zoom setups using servos and the like. It's mostly R/C tech, but still quite cool.

    My fav site for KAP is here.
    My website (in sig) doesn't have much for KAP resources, but it is useful to look at to see some of the other spiffy stuff.

    By the way, the kite obelisk folks are still at it, planning an even bigger lift, and with period materials. Should be exciting, but I don't have the full scoop, they are keeping it quiet until they pull it off.

    1. Re:From a kite flyer by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      For those of you who don't remember the kite obelisk project, slashdot has run a couple of stories about it. It's basically an idea that ancient egyptians *could* have used kites to do some of their heavy lifting for them.

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Re:dad + mom == kid [various] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You missed his point, if you're a dad, that means you have kids. The original quote is redundant, because of this.

  39. Re:dad == kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then you wouldnt be a dad anymore, so no

  40. Kite photography at my High School by nkrumm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At my high school (http://rhs.seattleschools.org) we have an after school club that builds rigs for kite arial photography. The trick is making the rig lightweight, yet strong enough that it doesnt suddenly snap 500 ft above the surface. Our mentor will be traveling to Antarctica this winter, and he will be taking a few of the rigs we have built. The Drachen Foundation has more info.

    1. Re:Kite photography at my High School by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I meet your teacher last week at a KAP conference in California. His trip to Antarctica sounds like a great adventure. KAP in extremely cold weather is very challenging, I wish him luck.

      There was a biologist who used KAP a few years back in the Antarctic to study penquin nesting territories. David Hunt

      Editor, KAPER

  41. Re:dad == kid by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 4, Funny
    As opposed to... ?

    Dads whose kids were killed by 40 pound kites with sharp metal parts attached falling out of the sky.

    --
    Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  42. What camera would you suggest attaching? :) by timothy · · Score: 2

    I see this one (the tiny l'espion camera), but see no supplier in the U.S. (anyone know of one?), which appears inexpensive and very light (40 grams!).

    There's also the SiPix StyleCam Blink, which is about $40, and slightly larger but takes higher-res pictures, too.

    What other tiny ones would be suitable for tossing on a kite (whether or not the two I've named would be), and what would be the best way to trigger them?

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:What camera would you suggest attaching? :) by MxTxL · · Score: 4, Informative

      While it's a good idea to keep things light, it's not the over-riding factor. The kites being used for KAP are usually capable of lifting considerable weights. There are quite a few kites out there (in the $300 or more price range) that need about 250-300 pounds of sand anchors to be safely operated. I've heard of large inflatable show kites that will pull two dumpsters full of sand across the beach.

      As for control, it's all R/C servos. It can be done with as little as one servo to pull the trigger but most people like to be able to at least pan some, so that's another servo. There are also some triggers out there that are just timer based... you set the timer, and hope you can get the rig up to altitude and pointing at the target by the time the trigger goes off... not flexible, but cheap and effective.

    2. Re:What camera would you suggest attaching? :) by chrooke · · Score: 1
      I've been doing fairly basic KAP using Brooks Leffler's basic rig for about 1.5 years now. I've found I get decent results with fairly cheap point-and-shoot cameras.

      The first one I used was a 35mm Samsung. I accidentally left it at home on one beach trip and picked up a reasonably cheap Advantix camera at a local CVS. Both cameras work, and I switch between them as needed. I think I've come to prefer the Advantix a little more because I've gotten some great panoramic shots with it, but a little more comparison would be good.

      High quality is really not necessary for low-end amateur use, and the less investment the less there is to replace if things get smashed. (Not that I've ever had this happen.) Both of my cameras definitely cost under $100, and I think the Advantix one was under $50.

      Here are some caveats with the cheaper cameras:

      • both of mine have some kind of auto-off feature that I can't seem to disable. This means I have to keep shooting at least 1 picture/minute to keep it on.
      • with a basic rig you need a camera that autoadvances with each shot. This puts you (I elieve) one pricing tier above the cheapest level of camera.
      • Brooks said zoom capability wasn't necessary and just adds weight. I'll back this up. The Samsung has zoom, and I never use it.
      • You probably need a tripod mounting hole to attach the camera to a rig. Don't forget to make certain the camera has one. Even if a quick and dirty rig doesn't need one, you might upgrade in the future.

      Some of the pics my team has taken are on our web site. We'll have to update this soon to get some of our more recent stuff up, so check back in about a week if you're interested.

  43. Re:dad == kid by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 2

    the way, what're you goin' didactic on yo ass!

    --
    example.org - powered by Linux!
  44. Re:bugger it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks - I'll give it a go for the next fp...

  45. Penguin kites by vortix · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    1. Re:Penguin kites by MxTxL · · Score: 2
  46. 'earth from above' by Jean-Pierre · · Score: 2, Interesting

    yann arthus-bertrand's absolutely tremendous photography was on display in chicago late this summer. yann took his images from a helicopter so i can imagine they are a bit more costly than its little brother kite. these images are nothing short of amazing.

    chicago department of cultural affairs: earth from above
    elexon presents: earth from above
    fujifilm presents: earth from above
    yann arthus-bertrand

  47. Pencam - much smaller, lighter, and easier by pm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I attach a small, cheap, 1.3MP digital Pencam to my R/C planes for aerial shots. Aiptek makes a 1.3MP "pencam" that weighs about 50grams. (without batteries) that works pretty well. The pictures out of the CMOS sensor and the cheap lens aren't as nice as conventional photographs - even from disposable cameras - but you can take a lot of them, and the really bad ones don't cost anything to develop.

    The camera is ~US$60-70 at Walmart and Circuit City.

    The official Pencam web site

    And a picture taken with my pencam from my R/C plane

    1. Re:Pencam - much smaller, lighter, and easier by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Hmm I fly R/C planes too. How did you control the camera?

      Timer?
      Servo?
      Custom controller circuit?

    2. Re:Pencam - much smaller, lighter, and easier by pm · · Score: 1

      One thing to note is that using a Pencam on a gas-powered plane (or helicopter) pretty much doesn't work due to motor vibration. You need an electric with the ability to turn off the motor, or a glider.

      To trigger the shutter, I used a heat glue gun to glue a servo to the top of the camera and adjusted the throw so that max rudder triggers the shutter.

      This is probably the least elegant approach and there are people who have done a wide variety of improvements over this. One of the best is an electronic circuit that triggers the shutter when the throttle is off - which thus works with 3-channel radios, and doesn't require a servo. Since the camera takes pretty lousy pictures with the engine on this works pretty well. There are others - some people have made circuits that use something like a 555 timer to take pictures at fixed intervals, some have made fully electronic systems that allow you to change the camera mode (from stills to movies, etc.).

      The best resource that I have found is this Aerial Photography Forum at E-Zone

  48. If only my kites would fly... by Blimey85 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This sounds like a great idea. I've done something similar using model rockets but had pretty lousy results. With model rockets there is exhaust vapors that you have to contend with and since the camera was aimed down the tube, most of the picture was blurry/smokey. I have two kites and I could mount a camera on either one pretty easy as they both have strong frames.. the only problem is that I've no success getting them to fly. Either it hasn't been windy enough or I'm doing something wrong.

    I used to fly kites a lot as a kid (was also when I did the model rocket photography) and never had a problem but now that I have these so called stunt kites, all that I'm ever able to do is a nose dive.

    The more I think about this, the more I like the idea though. If I get a better kite (that's a lot easier to fly and requires less wind), and I use a small wireless camera transmitting to my laptop, I wonder what kind of images I could get... could be quite impressive.

    How come all of the good ideas involving the outdoors seem to come around when the rainy season hits? I live in Seattle and the rainy season is upon us... I'll have to wait until the beach has some people worth photographing and then I'll give this a try. What's a very cheap wireless camera that can survive slamming into the ground repeatedly when the kite crashes? Any ideas?

    --
    How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    1. Re:If only my kites would fly... by MxTxL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you are having trouble, you are in luck living where you do. There are a large number of kite flyers living in Washington state. One of the best stunt kite makers are based out of Seattle. There are quite a few kite flyers in that area and an active kite club as well. These people will be more than happy to help you figure out what you are doing wrong, and better yet, will lend you there kites... the best of friends.

    2. Re:If only my kites would fly... by Sheyala · · Score: 1

      You might want to check out the GWTW forums. Alot of the Seattle folks post there, plus there's lots of friendly regulars to answer stupid qestions. :) I love my stunt kites.

  49. OUCH !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    That guys thumbnails in his gallery are 35k gif's... Talk about ASKING for bandwidth issues with slashdot.

  50. De-Classified by Grip3n · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like NASA has finally declassified it's old 1960's reconnaissance techniques...

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    1. Re:De-Classified by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Looks like NASA has finally declassified it's old 1960's reconnaissance techniques

      I expect a surge in anti-kite weapons now, especially in Hollywood.

  51. Comparison by First_In_Hell · · Score: 0

    This was the Taliban equivalent of modern satellite imaging & targeting. If it wasn't for that they probably wouldn't have lasted as long as they did.

  52. Ha! I thought he said KIKES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I realized Jewish people can't fly!

    1. Re:Ha! I thought he said KIKES by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Then I realized Jewish people can't fly!

      And you can, Flappy?

  53. Orthorectification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company I work for can orthorectify those cheapo shots for you, esp if you shoot a mosaic of these...

    http://pixxures.com

  54. I can see it now... by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Me sending my $800 Canon digital up into the sky to photograph scenes I would otherwise have to get from a low flying plane. Imagine the savings :-)

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:I can see it now... by CharlieO · · Score: 1

      Thats why most people don't use digital.

      Anyway once you've invested in KAP gear, there is little running cost, your Cessna 142 is going to be around 100UKP/150USD an hour to run, and you have the risk of leaning out of the plane.

      And at least in the UK you can't fly a plane at a low level (sub 250feet) and higher in some areas, but you can fly a kite.

      Serious (commercial) users tend to use large lift ballons as they are more stable and predicatble - I've seen a great book of pictures by a UK company that does this with a DV Cam and a Hasslebad medium format using a helium ballon - all run from the back of LandRover as studio/transport/ground teather. SkyCam I think? Sorry can't find it now on amazon.

      I'd like to see a plane station itself 60 feet off the battlements of an historic country house to get a birds eye view - ballons and kites can do that, only a rotary wing aircraft can and they probably won't fly that close, and cost uber amounts of dollars per hour!

  55. cheap form of air reconassance? by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 3, Funny

    don't laugh, some 3rd world countries are using this technique for air reconassance.

    In modern countries, ppl are using it to spy on there neighbors. Must we wait before there is a kiteonacamera.com ? "Kites flown over hollywood celebrities residences, 100% legal. For $5.95 a month you can have 24hr aerial vision of a hollywood supermodels".

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    1. Re:cheap form of air reconassance? by MxTxL · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even first world countries have long used kites for reconaissance. A lot of kiting development has taken place for military applications. Check this page for more details.

  56. LOL! Mod this UP as Funny by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2
    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:LOL! Mod this UP as Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, really. Hope I get to metamod that post.

  57. I Like This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids."

    Now, logically if you're a dad, you have kids, therefore if you have kids, you are a dad. What else could make a man a dad if he didn't have kids?

  58. Obligatory feminist gripe... by g33kgirl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids.

    *ahem* And moms. :p

    --
    You don't have to be the person you've become.
    1. Re:Obligatory feminist gripe... by SethJohnson · · Score: 2

      Totally deserved gripe. Sorry about excluding the moms out there. I got caught up in the reference after reading the Charles Benton's site (linked in the original post) where he talks about building a KAP rig for his son's science fair project. I know a lot of moms are out there also doing their children's science fair projects for them. They're just as guilty as the dads. I thought it was pretty ironic that Benton was essentially doing his son's science fair project and he's a professor of Architecture @ UC Berkeley! No knock on him, though. He did a tremendous job on his site and is an accomplished Kite Aerial Photographer.
    2. Re:Obligatory feminist gripe... by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      Certainly, but Dads with Moms have another recreational activity for windy, cold days...

      Cleaning the house.

  59. Re:I Like This! But I don't like you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A man with DEAD kids you Ass hole.
    It's a little hard to play with a corpse, you knob!

  60. It's too bad... by newestbob · · Score: 1, Informative
    ...that the editorial staff of Slashdot suffers from some form of dementia.

    Day after day, week after week, I tell them that the word "ITS" is the possesive form of "IT," and the word "IT'S" means "IT IS."

    Despite my best efforts, the editors come up with phrases like:

    art far beyond it's quick-and-dirty origins

    What can we--Slashdot readers who wince when we see our mother tounge mangled--do to make them stop?

  61. Re:bugger it the fP gap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever notice how all the FP people have small penises?
    I did.

    I don't usually look, but it is hard not to when they run around naked yelling, "I'm an Ass hole with a small dick." I just wanted to confirm that they were not an Ass hole, and that their dick was smaller than mine, and it didn't take long to see that both were true.

  62. Predator kite by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 2

    Maybe the military would be interested if you just add a bomb under it and have a longer wire.

  63. Slippery slope! by DEBEDb · · Score: 2

    Omigod, slippery slope! Quick, someone
    call ACLU! Who knows how long until they
    start using kites with cameras
    to snoop on everybody!

    (In ye olde days, an obFUD would be included
    here. So it is, by implication :)

    --

    Considered harmful.
  64. Re:SHORTEST AND LONGEST BOOKS EVER WRITTEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sir are clearly a gay Canadian.

    Just look at your preocupation with homosexuality, and Canadian subjects.

    I think you need to move the Montreal very soon, if you are ever to be happy.

    Go fly a kite too you knob.

  65. GOATSEX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in case anyone was dumb enough (like me) to click on that link...

  66. Photos for slide rules by gafferted · · Score: 2

    Note that Charles Benton (The guy who runs the first site listed) is offering a particular geeky barter: exchanging photos for slide rules)

  67. Don't forget rockets! by NerveGas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are also plenty of people who take pictures and/or videos from high-power rockets as well - and I'm not talking about the cheap Estes camera rockets. The preferred way to get still-shots is to use a decent-enough "point-and-shoot" with auto-advance, and wire a timer to the contacts of the button which takes the picture, although others use a servo to actuate the button, like this example.

    It seems like even more people take videos, however - everything from a tiny "X10"-style camera with a transmitter to the full monty, where multiple digital video cameras are mounted inside the rockets. One of the founders of Xircom, Dirk Gates, has some very high-quality DV videos of his rocket flights at http://gbrocketry.com/movie_theater.htm.

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  68. dads can have no kids by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    A dad can have children which are not kids. My dad has no kids because I am now 33 years old. My dad has no kids, and therefore, has no science fair project responsibilities. I agree with the other posters that I shouldn't have excluded the moms out there from science fair responsibilities. Sorry, moms.
    1. Re:dads can have no kids by technomom · · Score: 1

      Nope. To your parents, you'll ALWAYS be a kid, especially to your mom.

      JoAnn

    2. Re:dads can have no kids by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      No, worse: her "baby" ;-)

      I've met no small number of people in their 30's and older whom many would classify as a child. (Me too.)

      Don't you just hate smart-alecks who go running for the dictionaries right about now? Well, I'm not like that, I...

      kid

      n 1: a young person of either sex (between birth and puberty); "she writes books for children"; "they're just kids"; "`tiddler' is a British term for youngsters" [syn: child, youngster, minor, shaver, nipper, small fry, tiddler, tike, tyke, fry, nestling] ... 3: a human offspring (son or daughter) of any age; ...

    3. Re:dads can have no kids by SethJohnson · · Score: 1


      Ha-ha! I am a kid. Thanks for the lookup...
  69. Photoplane by mirko · · Score: 2

    There's also Photoplane who published similar works (taken from a motorized model plane) on GNUArt.net

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  70. Good business idea... by ctar · · Score: 2

    This hobby could pay for itself. People like having photos of their houses from the sky; especially rich people with nice houses and land.

    If you get the owners with their dogs in there, I bet they'd pay double!

    1. Re:Good business idea... by clunis · · Score: 1

      If you get the owners with their dogs in there, I bet they'd pay double!

      or sue you, take your kite, and give your camera to the dog.

  71. Radio-Controlled Trigger and Advance? by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Are there any camera/trigger combo mechanisms which could take more than one picture per flight? I mean if I let a kite out for 6 minutes, it's going to get a great shot from really high up...but then I have to reel the kite back in to take another picture.

    Anybody have any ideas on a fairly easy way to hook up something like an RC button to both shoot the picture and advance the film...or maybe a lightweight camera that auto-advances...so the RC motor only has to hit the exposure button...?

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    1. Re:Radio-Controlled Trigger and Advance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is generally what is done. Regular old R/C controls with a servo to push the shutter button and another server to pan the camera.

    2. Re:Radio-Controlled Trigger and Advance? by kc0dby · · Score: 1

      use really thin wire for your 'kite string' and then just fire it off directly. I've got 1000ft. of two strand laying around somewhere....

      --
      I apparently forgot that sig != uptime...
  72. Tried it... by jancastermans · · Score: 1

    ... you mean this ?

  73. WarFlying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As opposed to WarDriving. Just use aluminum rods to act as both the antenna and support for the kite itself.

    Hint: Fly this in a city park and enjoy the fun.

  74. Broken cameras - digital cameras by dsfd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For an outsider like me, it seems that the risk of ending with a totally broken camera is high. How often does it happen ?

    I've browsed the pages and they dont seem to mention digital cameras. Is it because they are too expensive to risk them ? (my aim is NOT to reopen the passionate discussion about digital/conventional cameras !)

    1. Re:Broken cameras - digital cameras by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      You know if you got a little CCD camera (~$50) which runs off a battery pack (~$5) and goes to a generic transmitter (~$50)... it's all very small stuff, solidly made. If you put it in the middle of a good-sized -- say five foot span -- delta stunt kite (I dunno what kind of kite you'd actually want to use, I'm only talking about what I know and haven't read the article) it would be pretty unlikely to break it. The nose of the kite will always hit first and you just have to mount it in such a way that it is not *directly* connected to the main nose-to-back spar which will absorb most of the damage.

      That's just for video though. A cheap-ass digital camera (no moving parts, soldered memory) will probably be plenty reliable. The passionate discussion about digital/conventional cameras IS worth opening here though; I've flown an ordinary boring diamond kite of about normal size to the limit of the string; ~500 yd. It was up pretty high, too. At the kind of heights we're talking about the amount of information you'll get back from a digital is pretty paltry.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Broken cameras - digital cameras by march · · Score: 1

      If you put it in the middle of a good-sized -- say five foot span -- delta stunt kite

      You typically can't get enought altitude with a stunt kite because the lines on a multiline stunt kite tend to be quite short. You really want a more traditional single line delta.

      Check out Into The Wind for a great selection. (I have no affiliation with them...)

    3. Re:Broken cameras - digital cameras by chrooke · · Score: 1
      I've been doing KAP for about 1.5 years using two different cameras, and I've never broken one. One of the main reasons is that I get a friend or two to help. The couple of times I've come close to damaging a camera happened in gusty wind when raising or lowering the rig, so that it was close to the ground. Having an assistant to either hold the kite or go grab the rig just as it gets within reach avoids problems like this. It also helps to make sure you use decent line that isn't likely to break on you!

      Until recently people haven't tended to use digital cameras for KAP, partly because of price and partly because of shutter speed. Even with suspension rigs cameras do tend to bounce around a bit. I have seen a few recent articles with digital being used. The "cheap-ass" digital cameras are the one's least likely to be suited to KAP, unfortunately. I have a couple, and they both have fairly low resolution and require a lot of light.

      As to flying height, the low lengths of stunt kites make for fairly boring shots, at least when you take a whole role of them. Higher shots are good, but at some point you have a hard time seeing the camera!

      Some of my pics. More to come in about a week.

  75. ah- photography by nightsweat · · Score: 2
    I swear to God, at first I thought this said aerial kite pornography.

    And the scarier thing is - I was intrigued.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  76. Brooks is a kite genius by zeke-o · · Score: 1

    I've got a couple of Brooks Leffer's box kites I bought from him when he had a shop in Annapolis 10 or 15 years ago. He builds a beyotch of a kite .. they're still flying to this day

  77. Please don't try this at home by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    Looks like a fun science fair project for those dads out there with kids."

    Editors modification: those responsible dads

    Otherwise, our publication will be sued when the inevitable mishap occurs.

    You know the one, that starts innocently like

    "Gosh, dad, the camera won't stay on straight and it's hard to control up there from down here!"

    "Hmmm. You're right, son. Here, you hold the camera.

    This is a pretty good-sized kite - how much do you weigh, again?

    I can't run very fast, but the car can..."
    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  78. Scientific American by LiamRandall · · Score: 1

    In the very back of the September 2000 issue of Scientific American there is an article Using a Kite as an Experimental Platform, which provides plans for a 'Picavet Suspension' system that you can use to keep your equipment (camera) level in flight, historical references, a discussion of kite types/recommended uses, and references.

    By the way, Shawn Carlson, the guy that wrote that article, is the Founder and Executive Director of the Society for Amateur Scientists. Seems like the type of organization slashdotters would enjoy.

    Hoo-rah for the day of the citizen scientist! Hoo-ray for the impending American Renaissance.

    --
    Great occasions do not make heroes or cowards; they simply unveil them to the eyes. -Bishop Westcott
  79. Airship Photography by skycell · · Score: 1

    My company Skycell has developed a range of airships which we use of aerial inspection, surveying, photography etc. We do a lot of work in Heritage and particularly stained glass recording in Cathedrals. See our work in York Minster (UK) here. http://www.skycell.ltd.uk/heritage/danminster.htm Other applications include industrial surveying or building inspection. The vehicles are precise enough to pick out any inch of the Cathedral in precise detail, yet small enough to fit through doors. We also have a (larger) vehicle that operates outside.

  80. Older than a Hundred Years by Cy+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    People have been attaching cameras to kites for quick-and-dirty aerial photographs for almost a hundred years.

    Either this story has been in the queue for way too long, or you need to verify your sources.

    Kite Aerial Photograhy began at least as early as the late 1880's with the work of Arthur Batut in Labruguiere, France - including this 1889 image of the city. He went so far as to use an altimeter to automatically adjust the focal length of the camera

    ~~~~~~

    KAP seems like a great application for one of those X10 wireless cameras. Outdoors they have a range of maybe 200 feet and that could probably be enhanced with a directional antenna.

  81. Kite Fighting by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

    This could add a whole dimension to kite fighting. Did anyone else do that as a kid? Duck tape the nose of a delta wing, use light fishing line, and try to destroy other kites. It's sort of like playing chicken or joust. I am not sure how a camera would hold up in combat though.

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  82. Kite Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the sport of kiting has boomed in the past 10 years, (ok so boomed is an exaggeration), I am thinking of building a 'Kite Park'. Not just an area set aside for flying kites in a public place, but a kind of small resort. A place that you could stay for a week and fly kites, build kites, ride kite buggies, practice KAP(kite aerial photography), etc.
    This park would be built and designed for kite fanatics by a kite fanatic.
    No motorized vehicles, LOW noise, few trees, wide open spaces.

  83. Kids have dads? by surph · · Score: 0

    ...dads out there with kids..

    really now... dads have kids? wouldn't have guessed it

    --

    --------
    Don't Get Caught
  84. Watch out for the cops? by bear_phillips · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have been doing kite aerial photography for a while. pictures here.

    After 911 the cops have given me much more problems. On more than one occasion I have the police come up and ask me what I have hanging from my kite. Usually after I explain things it is cool with them, but I have heard stories of people having the cops pull guns on them thinking they are distributing anthrax or other badness.

    --
    http://www.windmeadow.com/
  85. Pole Aerial Photography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use pole aerial photography for shots that kites can't make due to limited space or power lines. The trick is building a telescoping pole that is lightweight, but rigid when extended. Some folks who've been at it longer than myself have mounted 50 foot rigs to the backs of pickup trucks and minivans.

  86. Anyone else thinking.. by adrizk · · Score: 1

    ... that it sounds like a good episode for Junkyard Wars? :)

  87. Re:SHORTEST AND LONGEST BOOKS EVER WRITTEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mistake.
    I should have guessed you were actually from Michigan, but you must have taken a bath last week.

  88. An even more interesting site... by dcigary · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Phillipe Hurbain, a fellow panoramic/spherical panoramic photographer in France, has a site up on how he took a full-spherical panoramic picture from a kite. He's obviously much braver than me to put a $800 camera hanging underneath a kite!

    Pretty cool, and the panoramas are literally like you're floating in mid-air.

    http://philohome.free.fr/kitephoto/kapp.htm

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  89. X10? Hellloooo? by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    Wait, NASA actually has a page for rigging a cheasy disposible camera to a kite, but nothing along the lines of an X10? China IS going to beat us back to the moon at this rate...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  90. X-10 XCam by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Bringing new meaning to the product name...

    Although given X-10's marketing strategy, I'm not sure if it is really a new meaning...

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  91. Aerial web cam? by rholland356 · · Score: 1

    Why not? A cheap web cam, a wireless transmitter (or cat5 kite string), and you can snap away without film--you could even make video.

    Shoot, I bet there's someone who's set up a live KAP web cam with direct-to-internet feed. Just gotta search Google to find him...

  92. RC Helicopter photography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forget kite photography. remote control helicopter photography is way cooler. check out these video clips:

    http://www.rc-cam.com/moviecat.htm

    RC hobbists have been doing this for years.

  93. from someone who does KAP and kite fighting by chrooke · · Score: 1

    We have considered but not yet tried doing a KAP shoot (perhaps with video) during a "rokakku challenge" style of kite fight. One of the main reasons we haven't yet is that we have generally been participating in the battle, and couldn't be in two places at the same time. Another is the difficulty in keeping the KAP kite from interfering with the battle. (We tend to use rokakku for our KAP platforms.) Putting a camera directly on a fighting kite would be pretty dangerous. It would hammer your maneuverability, most likely break if you got cut, and stand a decent chance of injuring someone. For more info on our KAP and rokakku fighting activity visit Midnight Squadron.

  94. Veeeerrrryyy interesting..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a kite from a guy in Gwinn, Michigan a
    about eight years ago. It was called a GBK.

    His idea was to use them for aerial photography.

    The kite is, to put it mildly, enormous.

    It's 19.5 feet wide by 10 feet high - a big delta.

    The frame of the kite is articulated easton aluminum carbon fiber spars.

    It can be flown as a single liner or as a stunt kite.

    My idea would be - it generates so much lift that it really is perfect for aerial photography.

    Even on days with no or low wind the ground effect just generates unbelievable amounts of lift.

    I think I might just get into this and try it out.

    One night we were flying this and two other 9 footers with lights every 15 feet up the lines.

    And we flew them at night at a local field.

    We had people stopping their cars in the middle
    of the streets since the intersecting lines looked
    quite a lot like some kind of UFO or the like.

    Finally, people 20 miles away dropped by in their car and mentioned they saw them for miles.

    Night aerial photography would be quite amazing this way I think.

    The 9-20 foot kites have plenty of lift to lift nearly anything you can think of off the ground.

    One night we took two nine foot deltas and put a separate line between the keels of the two kites and hung a 6 volt halogen lantern that weight about eight pounds between the two. It was a very windy night but that thing went careening around crazily. Again, a camera would just as well and would likely be much lighter in weight.

    Anyway.....

  95. High Tech? by LittleDustPuppy · · Score: 1

    For anyone who's afraid of heights, this could very well be a solution...though I don't know how good of a camera you would want to use...(oh gee would you look at that, it's made a new friend[tree/wire]! *smashie smashie*). And if NASA is using this??? Are we progressing or regressing?? (Though I have to admit, I wish I had known about it when I had to do science projects back in the day!) LDP @~}~~

    --
    ~~{~~@ LDP @~~}~~
  96. don't try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't even try. Its' a mute point.

  97. Re:Oh yeah! by dirkdidit · · Score: 1

    Second post and already considered redundant? Apparently who ever moderated that forgot what slashdot truly stands for.

  98. kite panorama photography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been taken a step further, using a fisheye lens on a digital camera. Users of Panorama Tools may already be familiar with this.

  99. Re:Veeeerrrryyy interesting.....Sounds cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe try hanging the weight from the line about 50 feet below the kites next time. With my big lifters(hagaman 140, hagaman 60) I find the kite needs room to work and hanging a weight directly from the kite would interfere with the kites stability in a couple of ways. One is that a weight of a few pounds(connected to the kite body) will surely deform it, causing erratic flight. The next point is a little difficult to explain. Wind power is not like 'gasoline power'? For example I can lift a 20 pound bag of sand zippANG 70-80 feet in the air but only for a few seconds before the bag comes down at a pretty frantic pace. And then like a seesaw it will scream up again and repeat as long as the wind blows. With my biggest kite the 20 pound bag will go up and stay up but it will still bob up and down about 10-20 feet.

  100. how to protect your digital camera. by twitter · · Score: 2
    Make a foam enclosure for it, like this. I rigged that holder with a 9 volt battery, a flashing christmas tree light and a solenoid moved piece of music wire to push the button. Action Movie! (Yeah, yeah, my cameras put out crappy AVI files.)The camera used was very light and made of reasonable plastic so crashes like this did not ruin it. My second holder was built for a Sipix, which takes compact flash and has 2.1M pixels. I opened that up and soldered in an earplug jack which proved more reliable than the music wire, but was not too ugly. See how here.

    You slashdotted your cable box, you bastard!

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  101. Not really. Scary by twitter · · Score: 2

    It would only be scary if you published a recognizable image of someone without their consent. The disreputable state of your backyard, or you as you sunbathe there, can be seen by anyone in any small aircraft. Technology claimed that expectation of privacy long ago.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  102. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    It is only by risking our persons from one hour to another that we live
    at all. And often enough our faith beforehand in an uncertified result
    is the only thing that makes the result come true.
    -- William James

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...