Slashdot Mirror


Affordable and Safe Data Protection Practices?

cfreeze asks: "With the recent fire at the University of Twente, I started to think 'Are the steps I'm taking to backup my home network sufficient?'. The first thing going through my mind was the need to mail a set of recent backup discs to a family member. I feel this is a good first step, but due to the distances involved it may prove to be impractical. The second was a small hidden personal safe that is fireproof. What steps are you taking?" If you are interested in truly protecting your data, you have to realize that making backups is just a start. Next comes protecting those backups from floods, fires, and other catastrophes that might occur. What do you do to protect your backups?

254 of 583 comments (clear)

  1. the safe may be fireproof by phliver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but can the storage format your putting your data on stand up to the heat?

    1. Re:the safe may be fireproof by ChazeFroy · · Score: 5, Informative

      The submitter of this story should take a look at the ISO 17799 standard (formerly the British Standard 7799) for data security.

      As for backups, best practices suggests that you keep one on site and one off site. The off site location should be at least 6.5 miles from the site. This distance was calculated throughout the years as insurance companies assessed damage caused by widespread natural disasters (hurricanes, floods) and the area that was impacted by them.

    2. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Yohahn · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that WORM drives will work in some of these cases as there is more of an Etching going on..

      I've heard that canceled checks can be archived on these.

    3. Re:the safe may be fireproof by photon317 · · Score: 3, Informative


      While 6.5 miles may meet some statistical standard for insurers, it's not really sufficient in the individual company's case when planning to survive large natural disasters or civil disorder (or whatever else you haven't though of).

      As an example from a large telco I worked for - data from Omaha, NE was offsited to Washington and vice-versa. Cross-country like that is your best bet.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    4. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Cross-country like that is your best bet.

      I think companies in Monaco and the Vatican will prefer the 6.5 mile rule of thumb.
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    5. Re:the safe may be fireproof by pkiguruman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since most safes are designed to keep the temperature below that which will damage paper, I just uuencode all of my data and print it all up. Now I just need some more $$$ for a few more safes. (that paper really takes up a lot of space, maybe I should use BOTH sides of it.)

    6. Re:the safe may be fireproof by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      Quote the poster:
      data from Omaha, NE was offsited to Washington and vice-versa. Cross-country like that is your best bet.

      Quote the article:
      'Are the steps I'm taking to backup my home network sufficient?'

      Cross-country might be overkill... ;)

    7. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      While 6.5 miles may meet some statistical standard for insurers, it's not really sufficient in the individual company's case when planning to survive large natural disasters or civil disorder (or whatever else you haven't though of).

      As an example from a large telco I worked for - data from Omaha, NE was offsited to Washington and vice-versa. Cross-country like that is your best bet.


      Even better, if aliens come and destroy all the major cities, there's no way in hell they're going to bother with Omaha, NE.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    8. Re:the safe may be fireproof by buffy · · Score: 2
      can the storage format your putting your data on stand up to the heat?

      Rather than just looking for a standard Office Depot fireproof safe, you need to get a "media" rated fireproof safe. The same manufacturers make them, but you probably won't see it on shelves. I had to order them, and had them delivered.

      Lately, I've been using a safe-deposit box at my bank to store my home backups. That seems to be a decent solution.

    9. Re:the safe may be fireproof by photon317 · · Score: 2


      Actually, some of the reasoning behind the Omaha location is along those lines in a way. Omaha is a great location for a stable datacenter. Low population density, cheap land, no political uprisings to speak of, no nearby coasts, no major wartime targets, etc, etc.... All in all it's a great place to build a mammoth highly-redundant datacenter, it just sucks trying to find good people willing to work out there (or even travel out there from time to time like I had to).

      Our Omaha datacenter was very top notch by the way Designed to withstand tornado hits, heavy flooding, other random disasters. Security system (including external motion sensors and cameras) monitored locally and remotely in Dallas in realtime - one floor on ground level full of computer equipment on a 4 foot raised floor, and three underground floors housing the cooling, the generators, and the battery systems. Onsite deisel tanks to last days, 7 generators (5 needed, 2 for redundancy I believe), the bottom floor (batteries) designed with a 2 inch dip in the floor and a special rubber coating so that if all the battery acid leaked out it would be contained, etc... etc... Crazy over-engineering. The 4 foot raised floor is a geek's dream to work in. You can just hop down in there and work comformtably.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    10. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I'm in SoCal; my backups are in Nova Scotia. (And you think I'm kidding!) If there's a disaster here, how long will it take the dogsled to deliver my archives? :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:the safe may be fireproof by Reziac · · Score: 2

      You mean they were supposed to RIDE? Oh dear! :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:the safe may be fireproof by jweatherley · · Score: 2

      I suspect that the Vatican has got back up copies of the bible in off site locations. Monaco on the other hand may be in trouble...

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    13. Re:the safe may be fireproof by friscolr · · Score: 2
      Even better, if aliens come and destroy all the major cities, there's no way in hell they're going to bother with Omaha, NE.

      Omaha, NE is real close to where SAC operated back in the day. what's the name of the air force base there? i belive Bush flew there during 9/11.

      Had the Cold War gone hot, Omaha would have been well within the affected area of a number of nukes. Then again, Washignton would have been, too. Better to keep docs in Your Big City, and then in some Nowheresville.

      if you ever drive through NE, check out the SAC museum, off of I-80 in between Omaha and Lincoln (my photos of the musuem). it has a number of beautiful aircraft as well as a lot of historical information. Not nearly as large as the Dayton Museum (my photos), but still worth the stop.

  2. Keep my backups at work by MeerCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I keep my home backups at work, and vice versa... works for me...

    --
    I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    1. Re:Keep my backups at work by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2

      But what if you get fired? (in this slow economy, that is much more probable than having sth physical happening to your backup media...)

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    2. Re:Keep my backups at work by MeerCat · · Score: 2

      Well I bring them home when I get handed the black bag (the real problem is that I keep about 50-100 books at work too) and I usually start a new job the next day... ;^)

      The advantage of them being at work is that I know I have quick access, the office is quite physically secure and has fire protection, and I'm regularly reminded how old the last "offsite backup" is... whereas "mail them to a family member" - maybe not...

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    3. Re:Keep my backups at work by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then you play the little exhange game. Your data for my data. You want your shady finacial records, I want my porn. Or is it the other way around?

    4. Re:Keep my backups at work by MeerCat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was going to say that my karma is excellent so this wouldn't happen, but I see my original comment has been modded down already, so pardon me for a moment while I go hide my latest backups under the garden shed...

      I wish there was "no sig" checkbox on submission

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    5. Re:Keep my backups at work by MeerCat · · Score: 2


      Yeah, but she doesn't appreciate my taste in pr0n.

      --
      I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
    6. Re:Keep my backups at work by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Even if they didn't let you clean out your desk (which would surely constitute theft) it really woudn't matter, unless you got fired AND your home backups AND primary storage were destroyed all at the same time. Now that would be very unlucky indeed.

  3. Online Backup by ishamael69 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why not do online backup? Many companies offer this fairly cheaply...

    For instance NovaStor

    1. Re:Online Backup by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      Why pay for it? Just back up to your Slashdot Journal! :-)

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:Online Backup by Grab · · Score: 2

      Best answer - if you're doing work at home, make it a GPL project. You can then get yourself a SourceForge account, which (a) provides a convenient point to distribute your work to the world, and (b) provides an unbeatable off-site backup of the project.

      Of course, this isn't much use for other stuff like the book you're writing or whatever, but it's a good solution for software/electronics projects.

      Grab.

  4. Three words: by cje · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Safety deposit box.

    Your bank should make these available to you for next to nothing, and you don't have to worry about buying your own safe and making sure that it's secure, fireproof, etc.

    --
    We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
    1. Re:Three words: by tjanofsky · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While it may be safer than your house, keep in mind that banks usually do not insure safety deposit boxes, and they are often not liable if the box is destroyed (e.g., at the WTC).

    2. Re:Three words: by davidmcn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sure, they may not be insured, but odds are next to none that both the backup that you keep at your house, the current running version of things on your lan and your bank are ALL going to go the way of the dodo on the same day. And if your really concerned about that then keep 2 deposit boxes at different branches of your bank.

      --
      Memories become legend, Legend fades to myth, and even myth is forgotten by the time that age comes again.-Robert Jordan
    3. Re:Three words: by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 5, Informative
      keep in mind that banks usually do not insure safety deposit boxes,

      The idea is to keep two sets of backups: one onsite (i.e. at home), and another one at a remote location (i.e. at the bank).

      Even if the contents is not insured (what's the monetary value of your personal data anyways?), the probability that something happens both to your home and to your bank is quite slim.

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    4. Re:Three words: by Skjellifetti · · Score: 5, Informative

      The one problem you might have is if you die and your SO needs to get at the backups for some reason. Many (most) states require that the box be sealed on the death of one of the owners until the probate stuff is straightened out. This is the reason why you should not keep your will in your safety deposit box. Let the attorney keep it for you.

      Of course, having said all that, I'll admit that I back up my data to CDR and put the CD in the safety deposit box at the bank. The one thing those backups contain that might cause a problem for my wife is the MS Money backup.

    5. Re:Three words: by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      The one thing those backups contain that might cause a problem for my wife is the MS Money backup

      But this will only be a problem if :

      - you died in the fire along with the original copy (i.e. if you just had a heart attack she could still easily get to the original).

      - the safe deposit backup was the only one you kept. For things like financial info, you could easily keep a copy at work of give a copy to another family member, or give a copy to your wife to stash somewhere (probably her purse ;)

    6. Re:Three words: by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, they may not be insured, but odds are next to none that both the backup that you keep at your house, the current running version of things on your lan and your bank are ALL going to go the way of the dodo on the same day.

      Earthquake
      Tornado
      Flood
      Riots
      Nuke Blast
      Bio/Chem Attack
      Asteroid
      EMP Attack
      Bad Backups

      OK, so it's still not likely. Even just making the list I felt like a card carrying member of the Tinfoil Hat Cabal. Living in LA, I could see at least of three of those wiping out my data. Add a fourth if Jack Bauer can't stop that nuke.

      If you care about your data enough that you'd miss it if your town turned into a smoking hole, store a copy a few hundred km away for safekeeping.

    7. Re:Three words: by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is the reason why you should not keep your will in your safety deposit box.

      There is usually a provision for 'Will discovery'. One family member, usually the proposed executor/administrator, is allowed to go into the box to look for and retrieve the will. Life insurance policies as well. Nothing else may be removed, though, until after probate.
      IANAL, but I just had to go through this procedure.

    8. Re:Three words: by dildatron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hey, man, if all/some that shit happens, the last thing I am going to fscking care about is my backups. I think I will be glad if I am alive, and go from there...

      What good are my financial backups if my bank is now a pile of rubble? :) (joke)

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    9. Re:Three words: by hyperizer · · Score: 2

      Safety deposit box.

      Yeah, but that would be a big pain in the ass if your data changed with any frequency. Getting a safety deposit box opened can be a time-consuming process. I can't imagine doing it weekly (or more often) just to swap out a set of backup tapes or CDs.

    10. Re:Three words: by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

      I second this. I kick off a 40gb DLT Cartridge about every month. I have a 'fireproof safe', but the tape would just melt in there. We have recently gotten a safety deposit box and started dropping our tapes there.

      It can be a bit of a hastle to drive across town for a tape to restore that one 15kb Word Document, but you are nine 9s (99.9999999%) closer to being garounteed of your data's safety. To combat that travel time, we have a 325GB RAID 5 NAS server used for local online archival with plans to buy more as needed. I just wish Dell would hurry up and start putting the 320GB Maxtor in those suckers (:

      As for personal backups ... burn a CD occationally and take it to work - stick it in your desk drawer. For work, onsite NAS and offsite tape.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    11. Re:Three words: by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      BAH too difficult for anyone to practically keep up to date.

      Why is everyone ignoring the most logical of offsite storage?? your work. you have a desk or locker or torture chamber there... keep a set there and that way updating your offsite copies is as effortless as taking a set to work.

      The best backup plans are effortless or horribly easy. I.E. I take the offsite-A home with me every friday, and my boss Takes Offsite-B to his home on wednesday. Yes, if we have our building explode... we will be behind by 2 days... Whoopde-doo... we have 99.95% of our company data intact.. plus we keep a CD-R monthly copy set offsite at the records storage.. we have 65 CD sets there to date.. and we are now starting the destruction process WITH the paperwork and data...

      make it effortless... if you have to make a trip to the bank... you wont do it very much.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Three words: by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I'm dead what do I care if the backups are unavailable until after probate. At that point I am pretty sure that backups fall into the "Somebody Else's Problem" category.

    13. Re:Three words: by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2

      I would suggest that you read your employee handbook, especially the section entitled "No Expectation of Privacy" and then re-think whether or not you want your personal data locked up in a work-provided facility.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    14. Re:Three words: by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      Amanda does GPG. No one's reading anything aloud.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    15. Re:Three words: by joshuac · · Score: 2

      ---snip
      I would suggest that you read your employee handbook, especially the section entitled "No Expectation of Privacy" and then re-think whether or not you want your personal data locked up in a work-provided facility.

      ---snip

      If the critical backed up data (or the backup itself) is encrypted properly, who cares? Let 'em read it all they want :)

    16. Re:Three words: by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      I have, and you know what, it doesn't matter what you sign or what they tell you, your personal property is yours and they ARE NOT allowed to look at it for any reason. Can they come up to you and demand your wallet and rifle through it? Strip search you? search your car in their parking lot?

      anyone that would allow it is a complete idiot. your company is not allowed to trample your civil rights, no matter what they think.

      And yes, I have stood up against management that way... they wanted to search cars in the parking lot.. I told them that if they even touch my car I'll sue them so fast and hard that they wouldnt be able to sit down for a week. It was funny because they called in an officer and asked the cop to open my car.. the cop said, " are you nuts? without a search warrant it's illegal." got in his car and left after screaming at my bosses boss about making false police reports and wasting city time. That guy didn't work there much longer after I had my lawyer file a legal complaint directly to the companies CEO..."

      your company can blow all the hot air they want... they can do crap and they know it... and you had better know it too.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:Three words: by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2
      And yes, I have stood up against management that way.

      I'm suprised that you're still employed. As the lawyers have described it to me, it's perfectly OK for your employer to say, "OK, go collect your last paycheck then." If you work in an at-will state and are not under a Union contract, you're gone. No legal recourse whatsoever and a hell of a lot of explaining to do at your next job interview. You might even be unable to collect unemployment, since you were fired for cause (insubordination, to be precise).

      That also doesn't cover the situation where John Law walks in after hours and serves a warrant on your desk. With that statement in the book, your employer is legally covered when they say "go ahead." Again, you have no recourse, since you agreed the "no expectation of privacy" statement in hte handbook when you accepted a paycheck.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    18. Re:Three words: by sphealey · · Score: 2
      Hey, man, if all/some that shit happens, the last thing I am going to fscking care about is my backups. I think I will be glad if I am alive, and go from there...
      Respectfully, I would have to disagree. The day after the earthquake (I live a bit too close to the New Madrid fault in central North America) you will of course be busy seeing to your family, helping neighbors, making living arrangements, etc.

      But the day after the day after? People do survive disasters you know. Consider London during the Blitz - people lived and worked there throughout, actually increasing industrial production while the bombs fell around them. If you are a system administrator you have a responsibiity to your coworkers and fellow citizens to ensure that your organization can get back on its feet after a disaster, so people can get back to work and start to recover their lives and the economy in which they make their living.

      sPh

  5. How many buildings must burn by Phronesis · · Score: 5, Interesting
    When I was in graduate school, I saw enough disasters (laboratory floods, thefts, etc.) that the watchword became, "How many buildings must burn down for me to lose my dissertation data?" Multiple complete backups in multiple distinct buildings, separated by large distances on the scale of a firebreak was the standard.

    One fellow, who was paranoid about the permanence of magnetic media, even kept a copy of his raw data on punch cards (cartons of them).

    1. Re:How many buildings must burn by Bald+Wookie · · Score: 3, Funny

      One fellow, who was paranoid about the permanence of magnetic media, even kept a copy of his raw data on punch cards (cartons of them).

      I put mine on Kazaa as [tmd]8mile.(ftf).ts.(1of2)_COMPLETE!!1!

      Who said P2P doesn't have substantial non-infringing uses?

    2. Re:How many buildings must burn by habig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since my thesis experiment was in Italy but I was back in Indiana while writing up, I backed stuff up over the net to computers at the Italian lab, plus several different computers at IU. Each location was a mainframe (go VMS!) with its own IT professionals backing up those disks too.

      So, to lose my thesis, meteors would have to hit simultaneously on opposite sides of the world, at which point I'd have far larger problems than graduating :)

    3. Re:How many buildings must burn by YoungHack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is why I kept a CVS archive of my dissertation
      (done in TeX) with always at least two current
      checkouts going, one at school and one at home.

      I got the advantage of data stored on more than
      one machine at all times, together with freedom
      from the fear that I might not be working on
      the right set of files since I had version control.

      BTW I totally recommend checking your TeX files
      into CVS. When my thesis advisor would tell
      me to make a large edit (i.e. rearrange Chp 2 in
      a completely different order) I had the courage
      to "dive right in". Without the comfort of
      knowing I could unroll a goof, the trepidation
      of a large change would have slowed me down
      immensely.

      At the very end, when I couldn't even stand to
      read my own writing any longer, I would just
      check the spelling of my "diffs" before checking
      in changes and make sure they made sense in
      context.

  6. Portable hard drive by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Plain and simple.. hard drives are cheaper.. the USB/Firewire enclosures usually add $80 USD to the cost though. Thing is, you can plop that in to your briefcase or bookbag and take it with ya. Another option I was looking into was USB drives.. still costly though.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
  7. Well... by RinkSpringer · · Score: 2

    I rarely back stuff up. I can MP3 my CD if I need to, and no one cares about pr0n anyway ... or do they?

    For the stuff I *want* to save, I usually store them somewhere on my homepage (it's neatly backed up in 2 locations), and I burn it on CD.

  8. safety deposit box at the bank by dreamt · · Score: 2

    I have a box at my local bank. I take a tape there every few weeks or so for my home machines. My father who works from home takes tapes there every week. Just have a set of tapes to rotate in to the bank every so often. Box is something like $35/year. Worth having for other non-computer valuables as well.

  9. Protecting my backups by ralphus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I back everything up to large firewire hard drives on a rotating basis. I keep a set of near line that are in my house and turned off for emergency restores and then monthly copies offsite. Nothing fireproof or high security, just in another location where they aren't likely to get lost or stolen or to have both my house and the storage location both burn down at once. I have had one house fire in the past, even just the smoke from a small fire can do incredible damage to electronics (not to mention the rest of the house).

    I've found that the bigger problem for me is how the heck to find some backup solution that is cheap enough for home usage and doesn't just involve using multiple hard drives and can handle around 500 GB of data in a timely manner. I think that is a lost game

    --
    Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
    1. Re:Protecting my backups by jasonditz · · Score: 2

      Will a fireproof safe generally allow you to put a firewire harddrive in it? If so can you get a refund on the safe?

  10. What do you do to protect your backups? by GMontag · · Score: 5, Funny

    What do you do to protect your backups?

    I use the squirrel method, hiding my data on the drives of unsuspecting dupes all over the internet.

    Unfortunately, I can't remember where all of these bits are, so if my primary system gets messed up I am going to be dataless :(

  11. Fire at the University of Twente by Slycee · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's nothing compared to what happened to the Univeristy of One through the University of Nineteen. Let's hope they realize their mistakes with the release of the University of Twente-One

    1. Re:Fire at the University of Twente by tigress · · Score: 2, Funny

      University of One to Three were destroyed. University of Four disappeared shortly after it was constructed. Then, we built University of Five...

  12. Get a safe deposit box. by Prince_Ali · · Score: 2

    Home safes are only fire proof to a point. House fires can be hot enough to melt steel. I wouldn't want to take that chance with something that I could not replace. It sounds good for backups, but for data that you want to be extra careful with (code basically) a safe deposit box would be more appropriate. I have a professor who keeps CD-R backups of all of his code in a safe deposit box. I'm sure you could fit a couple magnetic tapes in there too if you want total backup.

  13. What do I do? by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have CowboyNeal hold on to my offsite backups.

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  14. cool by tps12 · · Score: 2

    Well, data protection is sort of an interesting topic, so I'm glad this story is running. I'm interested in what strategies people have to defend against Murphy. ;)

    I am, however, a little curious as to what is so important on a home network that offsite backups and a fireproof safe (!!) would be considered. In the grand scheme of things, are your pornography collection and your high score in Lemmings really that important?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:cool by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      what about 8-9 years of email? my thesis? custom firewall/sendmail/other rules that would take ages to rewrite? digital pictures taken at important events in my life?

      These are just some examples why I am probably going to go through the 'offsite box at my bank' route pretty soon...

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    2. Re:cool by GMontag · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ooops! In my other post I forgot about my porn!

      I keep multiple copies of that on 5.25, 3.5, CD, DVD and punchcards hidden throughout Northern Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania. My home copies are on 2 identical RAID 5 systems backed up to compressed Exabyte tape librarys (one in my apartment, one connected wirelessly to my garage on the same property but 3 buildings away). The apartments have a sprinkler system, so the RAID and Exabyte cabinets are tented with plastic. Working on an archive for my vehicle that backs up through an 802.11a connection whenever I park in the garage.

      It was just my defense contracting work I was talking about here

    3. Re:cool by exhilaration · · Score: 2
      Websites I've designed, my graphic design work, my papers from high school & college, older copies of my resume', pictures I've scanned or taken with a digital camera, source code, help files and how-to's I've amassed, every e-mail I've sent or received since 1996, a recipe (I have only one), bits and pieces of poetry that I hope to someday get published, etc. etc. etc.

      The value of information is subjective - one man's garbage is another man's treasure (or something like that).

    4. Re:cool by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      For me, it's mostly pictures, and most of those are either of my wedding or my daughter. In most cases I don't have access to negatives or prints for these (although if I did, they would probably burn with the rest of the house). While I could certainly live without them, it would really suck to lose them. That's not really much of an issue, though, since we're talking less than 1G of fairly static data, so a CD-R and a bank safe-deposit box, rotated once a month, is more than sufficient for my needs.

      I've certainly lost plenty of stuff in the past that I still wish I had, though. I collect interesting quotes, of which I've lost a few substantial text files, for example. Again, though, that's something I could totally live without, and had I thought about it at the time I would have just backed them up to my homepage space.

      Although I don't have any serious need for backups, I can see how other people might. I'm not a person who tends to collect stuff, and I don't place a high value on the data I do collect.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    5. Re:cool by fwankypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am probably going to go through the 'offsite box at my bank' route pretty soon...

      ...Famous last words...

      --
      The time of day is 29:33.
    6. Re:cool by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 2

      My home copies are on 2 identical RAID 5 systems backed up to compressed Exabyte tape librarys (one in my apartment, one connected wirelessly to my garage on the same property but 3 buildings away). The apartments have a sprinkler system, so the RAID and Exabyte cabinets are tented with plastic.

      This reminded me of a customer of the company I work for. They had a system set up with 2 Servers, a data mirror between them, and each server had the database mirrored localy. Basically, there were 4 drives with identical copies of the database. Actually a pretty normal setup for us. However, they made the simple mistake of not having an off-site backup, and lost thier data when someone flew a plane into the building. (They used to be in the WTC.)
      Fortunatly, the data really wasn't the, lose it and the business dies, type. It was just a pain for them to have to re-create. But still, made me realize that shit can happen on a large scale, and its worthwhile to keep a copy of important data somewhere else.
      As for my home machine, I don't bother. What am I going to lose? My Diablo 2 characters, oh well, it'll be fun building up new ones; my RPG notes, what few I have written down I could redo from scratch easily enough; my porn collection, I thought that's what the internet was for, a mass porn storage and retrieval system.
      If it matters, put it somewhere well away from the system. Safe Deposit box, Exchange CDs with a friend. A local solution is just asking for something to manage to take both the system and the backup out in one fell swoop.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
    7. Re:cool by ebh · · Score: 2

      Just for starters, I have financial records which keep me from being completely fux0red if I ever get audited by the IRS.

    8. Re:cool by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

      My uncle has run his tax preparation business out of his home for the last 30 years. I finally got him to make daily updates to his monthly CD-RW and then dupe that to CD-R at the end of each month. Then he keeps a copy in his fireproof safe, the glove compartment in his car for quick getaways, and he exchanges backups with his best friend and neighbor up the street. By now, he may even mail monthly backups to his daughter in Michigan. He lives on the gulf coast of Florida and has to deal with hurricane season and fire season.

      I've sat in his hot tub watching fire copters dunk water buckets in a lake past his treeline.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
  15. Don't forget... by puppetman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    just because you have a backup, doesn't mean it works.

    We were backing up our Oracle database with the export-utility, and DIRECT=Y flag. Well, unfortunately, sometimes a direct backup is corrupted (a direct backup bypasses all the SQL parsing, and unloads it directy from the tablespace).

    Now we restore our backups every few weeks to our development databases, to make sure they are working.

    1. Re:Don't forget... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most tape backup programs have a verify setting too, but that takes so long.

      I found it even quicker to replace /dev/st0 with /dev/null. I think GNU tar actually has code that detects when it is writing to that device to make things so even faster.

    2. Re:Don't forget... by dildatron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, that's what I do to. I have found if I jsut cp everything I need to /dev/null the data transfer is SUPER fast. I haven't needed to recover anything yet, but the speed at which I can back up my system is so fast that I can afford to do full backups several times a day. It must go to a spot on my hard drive platter that is near the spindle and can spin really fast - but I'm not a kernel hacker so I'm not really sure.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    3. Re:Don't forget... by MmmmAqua · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, if the author of this message's parent had been running Oracle in archivelog mode, he/she could just have backed up the physical database files and the archivelogs, instead of using Oracle's crappy exp/imp tools and putting the data at risk of irretrievable loss.

      The moral of the story: never forget that there is more than one way to backup your data, and if you're going to spend US$40k/CPU on database software, be sure you can also afford to hire someone who knows how to run it.

      --
      Arr! The laws of physics be a harsh mistress!
    4. Re:Don't forget... by puppetman · · Score: 2

      We do have archived logs turned on, and they stream over to our standby database.

      This is running on Win2k, so copying physical database files is not possible. RMan would be a better solution, but I don't trust,

      1) Repositories that need to be installed for a feature. I still have nightmares about that with Designer 2k.

      2) Incremental backups.

      As for Win2k in a production environment, one of our servers (including the database) was up for 120+ days, with an average Oracle load of 14%. Pretty good.

      Our other server (I just checked) has been up for 6500 hours. That's 270ish days, with a 5% load on Oracle.

      As *the* DBA, *the* database architect, the senior developer, and the person who moved the database environment from a Veritas high-availability system running on a million dollars worth of Sun hardware to $4,000 worth of Intel servers to save the company, I think I know more than enough to be able to make an informed decision.

    5. Re:Don't forget... by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      Just hope your disks never crash. Restoring from null is such a bitch.... and that is, if you can find the drivers (I think there are none for Linux). /lame joke

    6. Re:Don't forget... by the+way,+what're+you · · Score: 2

      Well I'm a kernel hacker so I can speak to this. The truth is, /dev/null is actually a device that implements Zeosync compression. Data sent to it is repeatedly compressed using this amazing algorithm until it is one bit in length, and only then is that bit written to the disk. That's why it's so fast.

      --
      example.org - powered by Linux!
    7. Re:Don't forget... by dildatron · · Score: 2

      ahh.. i understand now. i think my geforce speeds it up a bit too. the compression must utilize the spare cycles in the nvidia GPU.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    8. Re:Don't forget... by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      That may help...however, with something complex as an Oracle database, you may be getting good backups of a file, but what if you backed the database up while it was running, or didn't include one file into the backup.

      While you may have a great tape copy of the files, they may be worthless.

  16. The value of DATA by oldstrat · · Score: 2

    I'm sure that most of us undervalue the data we have stored on our personal equipment.
    Then again maybe not, usually when something gets degaused from one of my machines, I have it somewhere else on another.
    But your point is well taken, what would the impact be if I lost all the machines on my LAN at the same time?

    Is there a 'smart' way for me to back it up, or how would I even start to evaluate which amoung the folders of fodder were the ones to back up.
    Financial stuff would be obvious and easy, but beyond that it starts to get real muddy real quick.
    And then, how do I secure my backup?

  17. Connected.com rules by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I sleep in blissful peace because of this product: Connected Online Backup. All the files that change get backed up over the Internet every night on my system. It also does partial-file backups, so it figures out which part of a particular file actually changes, which works well for huge files like e-mail folders (my e-mail file is like 200 megabytes, and it typically moves about 20K every day). Of course, it automatically compresses the data when sending it.

    Security? It encrypts your data BEFORE it leaves your PC, and the security password remains on your computer. They are careful to tell you that if you lose your password, they can't recover your data.

    I've only had to restore a file a couple of times, but the few times I've done it seemed to work well. They also have a CD ordering option.

    The last time I posted about these guys some people said that restoring a lot of data tended to be kind of slow, but I don't have experian with that.

    Oh, the price? $14.95 a month, and I have several gigabytes backed up. Can't beat the price, can't beat the peace of mind. This service rocks.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Connected.com rules by forged · · Score: 3, Informative
      My company has deployed Netstore backup on all our laptops throughout the company (1000's), which does exactly the same thing as the program you describe. Netstore connects to a centralized server and only backup the important directories (read: user data). It works automatically at a pre-determined time interval, and if rather unobstrusive. I have actually saved files using it.

      Of course, next comes the question about what happens if the server takes fire. I'd imagine there is a redundant unit somewhere, but that is just a guess.

    2. Re:Connected.com rules by buss_error · · Score: 2
      I sleep in blissful peace because of this product: Connected Online Backup

      So you are comfortable with your backups residing with a dot com company. While farming out things can be nice for garbage and other waste removal, I don't think I'd be happy with someone else doing my backups. But then, I'm hypercritical and paranoid. Some of the technical people I respect have taken this view, but I'm too old fashioned to like it much.

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    3. Re:Connected.com rules by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> I'm hypercritical and paranoid

      I wouldn't say so.

      I've seen clients relying on such .com winners as iDrive and the like for backups.

      When the bubble burst, so did their piece of mind.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Connected.com rules by mosch · · Score: 2
      I use this service too, for my quicken files, but the lack of a high-capacity option, and the lack of a Mac or FreeBSD client keeps me from being able to use Connected Online as a one-stop backup solution.

      On the plus side, the restore isn't slow. I did a test restoration, to make sure the service actually worked, and it went flawlessly and got me my half gig or so of quicken data as fast as my connection would allow.

    5. Re:Connected.com rules by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      and the lack of a Mac or FreeBSD client keeps me from being able to use Connected Online as a one-stop backup solution.

      You're not supposed to do it, but I make a bunch of zip files out of my Linux data that I move over to my Windows machine every night.

      got me my half gig or so of quicken data as fast as my connection would allow.

      A half-a-gig of Quicken data?? How many checks do you write every month?? I have like 7 years worth of data, and it's only around 7 meg.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    6. Re:Connected.com rules by SquadBoy · · Score: 2

      No no you are not in fact if anything this proves that you are just smart. In any case let me tell you a little story about paranoia they thought I was paranoid when we decided to bolock ActiveX. Then you get a thing like this mornings shiny new MS hole that proves me %100 right. Never ever ever trust anything really important to someone that runs MS.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    7. Re:Connected.com rules by CodeWheeney · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately, the poster of this Ask Slashdot question is the CEO of Connected.com.

      --
      C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
    8. Re:Connected.com rules by afidel · · Score: 2

      Dude Connected is NOT a dot com, these guys have a serious product with very large clients. For an example I'm told that each server costs 1/4 million and they are normally installed in pairs. Our company currently has over a dozen of these clusters installed world wide with terabytes of data being backed up daily. As long as you don't use the heal wizard feature their product rocks. They do compression, change vectoring, encryption, and have a dead simple interface. The product is easy to use and as long as you don't do something insanely stupid when setting up custom exclusion rules you WILL get your data back. As far as what happens if the servers catch fire, you grab the tapes and restore the servers to new hardware, most you should be out is a day or two's data. If you really wanted to you could backup using a virtual san over wan to a remote tape silo but that costs a bit in bandwidth.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    9. Re:Connected.com rules by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      That's insane. You must be using some feature that I'm not using that uses a huge amount of space, although I can't imagine what that would be. Maybe it's time to run the Quicken datafile analysis program? :)

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    10. Re:Connected.com rules by vidnet · · Score: 2

      You do know that a company's website isn't representative of their server farms, right?

    11. Re:Connected.com rules by dissy · · Score: 2

      Our company does something similar but we run the service ourself.

      Two machines in outside COLO centers, which among other things, run BackupPC software
      http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

      Its one of the better backup packages out there and I would highly recomend to anyone that likes live online backups to disk.

      The software uses tar over ssh for unix and smbclient for windows, can backup hosts on static IPs as well as by netbios names for windows clients or unix DHCP clients.

      Restores can be done directly with the tar over ssh / smbclient options, or it can send the files in a tar or zip file over your browser.

      It does full backup and incramentals, and uses hardlinking as well as compression on the server side.

      275gigs of data accrost multiple machines for the past month packed into 42 gigs of space on the backup server.

      Best part is its live, so restores are quick and easy.

      You also define an owner for each machine, and when you log into the web frontend with a user/pass, that user only sees his/her own machines.
      Of course you can also define admin users that see all machines, or can even have only one user that is an admin and not use that aspect.

      Sorry to sound like an ad, but this backup package is best for the price if you run your own datacenter or network with a spare fileserver.

      Run one local and one over the net from a colo and your good to go!

    12. Re:Connected.com rules by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      That's a joke, right?

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    13. Re:Connected.com rules by cfreeze · · Score: 2

      I am not in any affiliated with connected.com.

    14. Re:Connected.com rules by |<amikaze · · Score: 2

      Dont post a link on slashdot, you should be fine.

    15. Re:Connected.com rules by CodeWheeney · · Score: 2

      I meant the parent post as a joke. I see it was moderated : Informative=2, Funny=1, Total=3.

      Wow, I'm either remarkably subtle or really stupid. I'm goin' with the former. You gotta have hope.

      --
      C8H10N4O2 | Developer > Code
    16. Re:Connected.com rules by peter · · Score: 2

      > Of course, next comes the question about what happens if the server takes fire. I'd imagine there is a redundant unit somewhere, but that is just a guess.

      Then you just tell everyone to be extra careful not to lose any data until you can get a new backup server running. Err, you also hope that nobody's already screwed up their files and is in need of a restore.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  18. Getting a little paranoid are we? by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 2

    If you are interested in truly protecting your data, you have to realize that making backups is just a start. Next comes protecting those backups from floods, fires, and other catastrophes that might occur. What do you do to protect your backups?

    If you lose your backups to fire, flood, or whatever, just make new backups. The percentage of incidents where you would lose both your backups and the originals (given that they are stored in separate places) has to be so minimal that only someone who is either incredibly paranoid or has some really, really important would need to do anything more than create one set of backups.

    1. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      I don't know about the "least" of your problems, I would think of it more as compounding or piling on to your problems. In the digital age I have photos (don't do the film thing anymore), personal records, emails, contact info for people I've long forgotten but am sure will need to contact again one day, etc on my computer, and if I lost all of that (including backups), then that would REALLY suck, BAD. But then again, that's the beauty of digital, I can backup all of our pics onto a cd (or several) and scatter them about significantly easier than I could do the same for my film.

    2. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      The percentage of incidents where you would lose both your backups and the originals (given that they are stored in separate places)

      Actually I think that this is exactly the info he was looking for. His statement was that it wasn't good enough to just make a backup and then throw it into your desk drawer, you should take further steps.

    3. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      I live in FL. We have had Hurricanes take out half the state. Do you really think a safety deposit box at your bank is going to make much difference then being at your home? Both are going to be have an even chance of being totalled and have good odds that both will be at the same time. California and its earthquakes are going to be much the same.

      This is where internet storage and broadband becomes appealing.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    4. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by afidel · · Score: 2

      banks not immediatly on the coast are unlikely to sustain enough damage to take out their safety deposit room. The coast is a problem because of storm surge causing flooding but otherwise a bank should be well enough built that a hurricane should not do any appreciable damage. Now an F5 tornado is another story.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Getting a little paranoid are we? by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      This is southern Florida. There is not a piece of land 15feet above sea level. A large storm surge from a Category 5 Hurricane and 25 miles is under water. But I was talking more about the damage from the winds.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  19. rsync with cp -al by gambitdis · · Score: 5, Informative
    We have just created a new policy of backing up to a remote location using rsync and cp -al. Basically we do an rsync then daily copies on the backup machine using hard links. There is a very good introduction here.

    We're doing this in an enterprise environment, but it would be easy to co-ordinate between two friends as well.

    --derek

    gambitdesign.com

  20. freely available, redundant webcaching. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    To backup all of my important data, I like to post it to slashdot. That way, it'll be in the /. archives, and eventually cached on google somewhere.

    For instance:

    Grocery list:
    Milk
    eggs
    50 CD/R spindle

  21. Use Kazza to make backups.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pad your data into some porn movie and you will have loads of copies floated around the internet.

  22. some very important steps from by Archfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful

    someone whose been burned before. The media must be stored offsite in a dark temp. controlled vault, media deteriorates so long term backups must be re-written to NEW media every 12-24 months according to vendor specs, and if the data is important you need to keep MULTIPLE generations on NEW media, and periodically PERFORM A RESTORE to verify readability and the fact that you are actually capturing what you think you are. If you are a linux/unix environment you are blessed with ufsdump, otherwise welcome to 3rd party HELL. Aix even has a bootable recovery image...mksysb i think

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:some very important steps from by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      For the cheaply minded, generic safe deposit boxes at banks are a good start. They're usually pretty good about you coming in so often to pickup/dropoff stuff, and are (hopefully) pretty good about protecting them.

    2. Re:some very important steps from by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "...and periodically PERFORM A RESTORE to verify readability and the fact that you are actually capturing what you think you are."

      Absolutely right - one time, a client's business got broken into and all computers stolen. Fortunately, a cyclic zip disk backup was already implemented and all data was saved on those discs...

      ...except for this one admin assist whose very important accounting records were not on those discs. She saved them to separate floppies. But her box of floppies was bad.

      Turns out that nobody ever tested the integrity of the backed up data on those floppies! (And really, floppies are terrible for backup in the first place. They are too easily damaged.) It was pretty obivous to me that something was going wrong because the floppy drive made strange groaning noises when disks from that box were put into it, but with non-technical people such blindling obvious things simply don't occur to them.

      TEST YOUR DATA-BACKUP INTEGRITY!

    3. Re:some very important steps from by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      actually that is a really good idea, provided you don't need 24hr access to the data.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    4. Re:some very important steps from by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Speaking of floppies .. are they actually still being made, or are those sold new in fact old warehouse fodder? Reason I ask, I've noticed that *ALL* 3" floppy media started going back pretty much together as of a couple years ago. Now I'm hard-pressed to find a diskette that's 100% reliable even in the very short term (format disk, copy data, sneakernet to wherever, data is already corrupted!!)

      (One hates to burn a CD just for a single 1mb file!!)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:some very important steps from by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Speaking of floppies .. are they actually still being made, or are those sold new in fact old warehouse fodder? Reason I ask, I've noticed that *ALL* 3" floppy media started going back pretty much together as of a couple years ago."

      Floppies are still being made. I have seen 100 packs at costco. BUT the ones being made now are crappy. They only have glue on the corners to hold the two plastic halves together. Dust can get in the sides. The older floppies from times past are glued all the way around for longer life. Try to find OLD floppies!

      Also you might want to check out one of those USB memory key devices.

    6. Re:some very important steps from by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Actually, the ones at Costco are what I'm talking about. They bear a TDK label but they look suspiciously like old Verbatim or Fuji disks; that's why I wonder if they're actually of recent manufacture, or if they were rescued from the back of a warehouse and relabeled.

      The lack of glue all the way around is nothing new; it's always been so for cheaply-made disks (you shoulda seen the first ones from China!) But dust isn't really the issue. If it were, there wouldn't be a live 360k diskette left on the planet.

      The best floppies (and backup tapes in the QIC80 era) were always Sony, tho quality dropped somewhat when they went from grey box to blue box. (Apparently made in a different plant.)

      I've got *hundreds* of old floppies, from early single-sided 5" sloppies and 3" crispies. They've been going bad in consistent patterns:

      720k 3" went first, starting about 6-7 years ago, usually with total fails (bad track 0). 1.2mb 5" went next, tho usually just odd bad sectors. 1.44mb 3" as noted started going all in a bunch a couple years ago. And the huge majority of 360k 5" disks are still good, even tho some are now over 20 years old; however those few that fail become completely unreadable (diskette? WHAT diskette??)

      The REALLY scary thing is that I've used enough floppies over the years to see the patterns!! Someone should lock me up before I hurt myself. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  23. Iron Mountain by Gudlyf · · Score: 2

    We use Iron Mountain for an off-site location for storing our backup tapes, but they're pricey and certainly overkill for home backups.

    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  24. Make sure your backup methodology is good to start by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First, you have to make sure your backup method isn't prone to mistakes. One setup I had to clean up involved reusing the same three backup tapes for god knows how long (about one file in three was properly restorable) and was missing perhaps the three most important datafiles on the system because they happened to be in use during the backup and the guy that set it up didn't realize that was a problem.

    Right now, CD-Rs (not -RWs) seem to be a great way to store moderate amounts of data. -RWs suffer from degradation pretty quickly despite their rewriteability (I've never seen one live up to the '1000 writes' standard they claim -- more like 3-7). For larger amounts, DVD-R may be the wave of the future, but high-quality tapes are probably as good if you can persuade your boss to let you replace them from year to year.

    Periodically, it's important to store your backups offsite. A safe-deposit box works well, or perhaps a fireproof safe if you're worried about the confidentialness of your information. But yeah, I'd move that stuff offsite biweekly or monthly at a minimum.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  25. I'm smart by grub · · Score: 3, Informative


    I keep all my MP3s backed up on Kazaa.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  26. 9-11 IT recovery tally? by peter303 · · Score: 2

    I presume the recovery after 9-11 was all over the board. Some companies did not have adequate backups of all their business records. While others, like the stock exchanges did fine.

    1. Re:9-11 IT recovery tally? by jafac · · Score: 2

      during the original WTC bombing, one of the companies I heard about had their offsite backups located in a building just across the mall. Since that area was off-limits for several days due to the hazards and the building inspectors checking things out, and the police gathering evidence, they could not access either their primary data OR their backups, so they had all their workers set up at a hot-site, temp offices, phones, equipment - and no data for several days.

      Something like 95% of businesses that had no disaster recovery plan failed within a year of the first bombing.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  27. Store them in space by Ryu2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously. If privatization of space continues to grow, and launches become more afforadable, I'm predicting we may see businesses offering to launch your media into space, where the only thing that will destroy your data is the occassional asteroid collision.

    Might still be too expensive for the individual, but I can surely see a large multinational corporation thinking about this.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:Store them in space by Psiolent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about recovery? That'd be an interesting scenario.

    2. Re:Store them in space by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      Seriously. If privatization of space continues to grow, and launches become more afforadable, I'm predicting we may see businesses offering to launch your media into space, where the only thing that will destroy your data is the occassional asteroid collision.

      The problem with, say, backing up to a satellite full of drives (or even just launching a box of tapes or CDs) is that most media will degrade quite quickly in space. You're bathed in enough ionizing radiation to make electronics go funny every few minutes to every few weeks, and that's when there *isn't* a solar flare going on. Magnetic and optical media are more resistant to radiation, but are far from immune. Think of this as being put under an airport x-ray machine for as long as it's up there.

      Multiple earth-based sites gives much better reliability.

    3. Re:Store them in space by Ryu2 · · Score: 2

      Before the advent of digital imagery, photorecon sats routinely ejected film canisters which were then recovered on Earth. It's a tried and true method.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    4. Re:Store them in space by ek_adam · · Score: 2

      Cosmic rays, solar flares, Van Allen Belts...

  28. Protecting the tapes: by foo+fighter · · Score: 2

    Get a $30-$50 home safe to keep onsite backups in. Most are fireproof for about 45 minutes. They are usually also waterproof. I don't know how well they'd stand up to your house colapsing on them.

    Get a safe deposit box at your bank to keep offsite backups in. Most banks offer these to their members for free or a reasonable rate -- much cheaper than mailing tapes or disks. I keep my monthly backups there. Once a month rides the line between "current enough" and "so often it's annoying so I don't do it like I should".

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
  29. Why physical backup-tapes? by redhog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why do o many people use physical back-up-tapes, so that it is boring and time-consuming, and so that they don't back-up that often, which they store near the computer, so that they all can burn at the same time, when they could make a cron-job that rsyncs their data to some remote site(s) (and yes, rsync, _not_ scp or something, that would take a hell lot of bandwidth)?

    I back-up my system that way (it's about 10Gb), over a 1Mbit link. At the moment I just back it up that way to one remote site (about 5km away), but soon, I will probably back it up to one more site (about 2km away).

    This is much safer (as it is done more often), and much easier (as it is fully automatic) that tapes or CDs or whatnot.

    --
    --The knowledge that you are an idiot, is what distinguishes you from one.
    1. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Because network bandwidth is expensive for a home user. What are you going to do when your broadband provider puts a 2GB/month limit on your account and your backups start failing after the first week? The only reason this works now is because broadband providers still have competition (although they're slowly buying it all up) and neither side wants to introduce bandwidth caps (that users find distasteful, even if they aren't hitting them) and drive away their customer base.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by PD · · Score: 4, Informative

      Better than rsync:

      unison - I keep my desktop, server, and laptop synchronized over SSL connections. Like rsync, it sends minimal changes to keep source trees up to date. I can sync over a gig in my home directories in much less than a minute unless I dumped a whole bunch of new stuff on there.

      http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/

    3. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by mosch · · Score: 2
      i actually do rsync some of my data off to a colo'd server, but that's not a backup.

      you see, the problem with rsync is you don't have any versioning. If I overwrite a file, then perform my backup, then realize that I overwrote that file, I'm fucked. I can't pull yesterday's rsync, or last week's rsync.

    4. Re:Why physical backup-tapes? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I use incremental dumps and my daily dump size from yesterday was: 1,560MB. Now I'm into digital fansubs so this number is inflated, but it should show how easy it is to blow through the bits once you start doing interesting things.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  30. where are my mod points when I need them... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 5, Insightful

    mod parent up: a while ago I was thinking about getting a fireproof safe for my own backups, but fireproof (as defined by manufacturers) doesn't really mean 'compatible with magnetic media', since an inside temperature that doesn't make paper burn and/or plastic liquefy, is still a temperature that will probably cook your cdr dye and/or play havoc with other magnetic media.

    I found that there were safes that were guaranteed to keep the inside at a temperature compatible with storage media, but their prices were not as affordable (obviously).

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Insightful
      since an inside temperature that doesn't make paper burn and/or plastic liquefy, is still a temperature that will probably cook your cdr dye and/or play havoc with other magnetic media.

      Not to mention that the walls of fireproof safes are usually filled with moisture-retaining material. That helps with fires, but the humidity inside the safe is always high. Over time, that could degrade the plastic and metal parts of any digital media stored inside even without a fire.

    2. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, if you buy a good small one, spending about $150 or more, it will protect from fires for about 2 hours. They are rated in the sales literature. It will ensure that your media inside stays within the adequate temperature range for a total of 2 hours while it is in the fire. If it is in the fire for longer than 2 hours, then you will have problems. Since most fires burn for less than 2 hours, you can rest assured that your data is safe using one of these devices.

    3. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by elvum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure that follows - if it were the outside of the safe that melted shut, it needn't be the case that the inside melt too...

    4. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by sphealey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      mod parent up: a while ago I was thinking about getting a fireproof safe for my own backups, but fireproof (as defined by manufacturers) doesn't really mean 'compatible with magnetic media', since an inside temperature that doesn't make paper burn and/or plastic liquefy, is still a temperature that will probably cook your cdr dye and/or play havoc with other magnetic media.
      There are various types and quality levels of fire resistant (not fire "proof") safes. Different types are required for paper vs. magnetic media (the ones for paper have a moisture-containing material in the walls that releases the moisture above a certain temperature, preventing paper from turning into dust as it heats up). And while the $75 ones from Wal-Mart are better than nothing, commercial quality safes with most of the gotchas engineered out usually start around $500.

      However, an on-site fire resistant safe is just a starting point. I am sure there were lots of them in the WTC towers and they didn't help much.

      sPh

    5. Re:where are my mod points when I need them... by nakaduct · · Score: 2
      fireproof (as defined by manufacturers) doesn't really mean 'compatible with magnetic media', ... [those that are] were not as affordable


      This is not consistent with reality. A "fireproof" safe is one that delays heat transfer across its walls. Actual fireproofedness is, of course, not possible.

      If media fails at temps of (say) 250F, and you buy a safe that can keep temps below 450F for one hour, then that safe will keep temps below 250F for 1 hour, minus X. If you upgrade to a four-hour safe, then you're good for 4 hours minus Y ( > 1hr - X ). Heat transfer is a well-understood phenomenon; you can approximate X or Y, given reasonable values for inner temperature, burning-room temperature, some graph paper and a physics book.

      You don't need a "data-grade" safe. Buy a regular paper-grade safe, with a rating of however long you need, plus a cushion.
  31. I don't know about your home network, but... by craenor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I lost my home network in a fire, the data is the last thing I'd worry about losing. But assuming I still have a house and a network to use my data with...I would just skip backups and go with full reinstall/recreate, more fun that way.

    1. Re:I don't know about your home network, but... by Lxy · · Score: 2

      data is the last thing I'd worry about losing

      Why? Home insurance covers hardware. Cat5, switches, PCs, even your house itself... you can buy that with insurance money. For $40/mo, my home is covered. If it gets firebombed by the tree in the backyard when we're not home, what have i really lost? That's right, ANYTHING MONEY CAN'T BUY. Pictures, sentimental gifts, and oh yeah, MY DATA. hard drives are cheap, building a backup server is cheap too. All you need is an old pentium or better, a 10/100 NIC, and some big drives. I have a pair of 80GB drives. I have a 40 in my box and a 20 in my wife's. The box is set up as a Samba share, and cron does it all automatically. Every night at 1 AM, it connects and does diff backups on our boxen. Once a week, it does a full, and on Monday I swap drives in my drawer here at work. It cost me about $200 to make (it was awhile ago), a couple hours to build, and zero effort to maintain.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
  32. pr0n!!!! by forged · · Score: 5, Funny
    no one cares about pr0n anyway ... or do they?

    You're new around here, aren't you?

    1. Re:pr0n!!!! by dildatron · · Score: 2

      Actually, I have found that pr0n is so accessable nowadays, that I don't bother saving my video collections when I want to reformat everything.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
  33. Fireproof safes are not good enough by buss_error · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Tempatures in fire proof safes will rise enough to destroy media. Unless the safe is rates MEDIA fireproof (or some such, I foget) it won't be enough to have usable backups after a fire.

    A good alternitave is to put your backups in a safe in the back yard.

    --
    Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  34. Affordable and Safe Data Protection Practices? by jki · · Score: 2

    scp * account@somewhere.else.than.your.neighborhood.

  35. Re:Fireproof safes... get a media safe by ip_vjl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Years ago I did web work for Sentry (a company that makes fireproof safes). They have a "media safe" specifically for computer media.

    From their description:

    While paper chars at 450 F (232 C), damage to computer media can occur at temperatures as low as 125 F (52 C). The interior of a Fire-Safe Media Chest or File remains well below this damage level during an average fire.


    If I remember correctly, they're only rated to keep the temperature in a safe range for about 30 or 60 minutes - hopefully enough for the firefighters to have done their work.

    One thing about the fire safes - make sure to keep them locked. A lot of people don't think of this, because they're only worried about fire, not theft - but if the floor/table they're sitting on gives way and they drop and the door pops open, it doesn't really matter how good the container is at resisting fire.

  36. Re:work backups at home? no(13x)o by MeerCat · · Score: 2


    Forgot to say, I don't live in the USA, and I work for small companies, so this isn't a concern for me although it's a valid point.

    Anyway, the point was more about taking my home-backups to work, and while I'm sure some lawyer could find a problem with this practice too, the fact is it works for me, and for "home backups" I'd suggest it's often a reasonable solution.

    --
    I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered. - George Best
  37. Thesis backup by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2

    When I was in the final stages of writing my thesis, I had backups on ZIP disks:

    One set in the same room as my computer - generally a day or two old.
    One set in another room in the house - a bit older.
    One set in another house in the same city.
    One set (a few weeks old) in my brother's house about 500 km away.

    This gave me a good lifeline to sanity when I accidentally deleted my partition table a week before finishing. (In fact, I didn't need the backup - I had the partition table info in hardcopy and just reentered it.)

    Now I use my computer mostly for games, so my only backup is that my parents have copies of all my photos.

    "Paranoia is good".

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  38. infect your machines with nimda by migstradamus · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about all the people who used the "Nimda Distributed Backup Plan"? Infect all your machines with Nimda and let it send your files out to dozens of people around the world on a regular basis.

  39. Priorities by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2


    How about having a plan to saving your family and yourself incase of fire?

    Really who cares about your email's you sent out announcing a party in the long run?

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  40. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Informative

    You, sir, are a dork.

    If your house burns down, it will burn all night and into the next day.

    And for what you spent on all those safes, you could easily rent an insured safety deposit box at your local bank.

    Of course, you know, that means going outside.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  41. my backups? by Maskirovka · · Score: 2

    What do I do with my backups? I upload them to "backup servers", and in exchange for the service, I backup the server admins stuff from the backup servers. With a little bit of time and effort, and if you have good stuff to back up, you can have it mirrored at hundreds of hotsites all over the globe, making it virtually indistructable!

  42. A decent and affordable backup system by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok here's what I do for my small (about 12 persons) company:

    You need two server machines, one to be the primary server, and one to hold a backup drive. (having the primary and backup drives on seperate machines prevents total loss through several faliure modes right off the bat, like a power supply malfunction on one machine)

    These machines can be affordable and inexpensive Pentium II or III machines.

    For this example, I'll tell you exactly what I used.

    I went to newegg.com and bought three identical hard drives, 80 GB maxtors. I also purchased a lian-li removable IDE hard drive bay plus an extra cartridge for it.

    I put one of the maxtors in the primary server machine, and made it the primary drive.

    I put the other two maxtors in lian-li removable carts, and labeled them Backup drive A and Backup Drive B.

    I put backup drive A in the lian li bay on the backup computer.

    On the primary server, I made two tasks with windows task scheduler:

    The first task does a full backup every monday night to the backup drive over the network.

    The second task does a nightly incremental backup, on every night of the week except monday night.

    When I come in on Monday morning, I remove the current backup drive, take it down to our safe deposit box at our bank, and swap it for the other drive, which has been sitting there for a week. in the evening, task scheduler runs a full backup on the drive.

    So at all times, there is at least a week of incremental backups in case a deleted file needs to be retrieved, and there is an offsite backup that is never more than a week old, and there are nightly incremental backups on-site. All you have to do is swap the drives once a week and take them to your favorite off-site location for storage.

    I've been doing this for a few months now and it's been good. I also put the server and backup machine on UPS, and the primary server has control of it through USB, and shuts itself down before the power dies.

    --Mike

    1. Re:A decent and affordable backup system by puto · · Score: 2

      Hey Phantom,

      I do something similar on my home lan. And am actually implementing it at a clients site next month.

      I have 2 80 gig external USB/FIRE drives. They are connected to my home lan via a USB 2.0 port(i got the firewirewire addy as well so I could zap on with the old ladies ibook, she thinks i married her for her looks).

      Anyway on a 2000 box it hits my linux box, a 2000 server box, pro box, and an xp box. Using the built in backup. Backups up my data at 400 kbps.

      Every morning I unmount one drivc, and plug in the either. The drives are identical(cloned directory structure).

      So I have a full back up daily without too much trouble. I will probably go to a Mon/Wed/Fri thing. And I always leave one at the office over the weekend.

      I still burn stuff but this makes it easy and is an added sleep well measurement for me.

      The drives are from www.zeehoo.com three year warranty and dirty cheap. I paid 141 dollars each. They come in a cool case with its own cooling, and it looks neat as well.

      PUTO

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  43. Take your backup media to work with you.... by gatkinso · · Score: 2

    ...there you go.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  44. Use the Net by nautical9 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    With broadband being so popular, all you need is a family member/friend who also has it, and write a little script to zip up and ftp/scp the backup file to their computer. They do the same to you - should a fire break out, it's doubtful both of you will be affected. If it is a concern, just add more people in the "ring".

    No need for big backup tape drives or burners, and no hassle once you have it up and running. (Of course, the usual "test your backups" mantra still applies - no sense backing things up if you're not doing it right).

    You can also use a dynamic DNS service and client apps so you don't have to constantly updating IP addresses when the ISPs change them.

  45. easy solution by cmckay · · Score: 2

    Just mail your backup CDs to me. I need some more frisbees.

  46. VPN With Friends by Myriad · · Score: 2
    Having recently been considering this problem for home use I came up with this idea:

    Create a VPN with a series of trusted friends. Each person 'donates' a few hundred megs to the project.

    Critical data can then be PGP encrypted and stored on the virtual network drives manually or by backup software. This way no one can tamper with the archives.

    This works for me as I'm mostly concerned with backing up source code. It's useless for backing up digital video, but I usually don't worry about those assets too much after a given project has been completed.

    Won't work for everyone, but I think it's handy. Oh, and backup your PGP keys and keep them in a safety deposite box or something... otherwise you'll really be screwed.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  47. Just use Kazaa by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2

    Encrypt your files and name them something like "Hot Goat Sex", and share them on Kazaa/Gnutella/eDonkey/etc. Then, when you lose your data, you just go cruising the the net for your files again! The only problem will be sorting out your files from the real goatse.cx files!

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Just use Kazaa by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2

      You might want to check out FreeNet then.

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  48. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Casca · · Score: 2

    For smaller amounts of data, like key documents, quicken files, and the sort, online backup could work. I just archive my most important files, compress/encrypt them, and then regularly ftp the files up to my ISP. This wouldn't work too well for an MP3 collection or anything, but for the stuff you REALLY need to be able to access, it can be a lifesaver. One of the nice benefits of uploading it to an ISP account, is that you can then reach it from anywhere in the world that you have access to the net.

    I know it may not be the most secure method, but I am willing to accept the risk of someone being willing and able to hack the ecryption on my files.

    --
    Casca
  49. coasters and free windowscd based backup software! by Flamesplash · · Score: 2

    I use my backup cd's as coaster, then I don't have to worry about people stealing them.

    The question I really want answered is, what is a good free windows backup program that does incremental backups to any cd burner? I found one once, but it required I have easy cd creator, which is $100 alone. I have Nero, paid for it any everything, but I can't find anything to serve me.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  50. The paranoid's method by swb · · Score: 3, Funny

    1) Create false identity

    2) Buy plot of land in extremely rural area close to Canadian border. Use false identity, pay cash.

    3) Build small, subterranean concrete bunker (10' x 10'). Install water-tight safe in bunker. Camouflage bunker, make it tamper-evident.

    4) Visit with data periodically.

    You now have a safe place to store things. Safe from fire, flood, and most importantly from the government. Since you bought the land with false identification, they can't shake you down for what you have stored there, unless they know about it. It's close to the border, so you should be able to get the contents fairly easily from the other side of the border -- or get the data as you go OVER the border.

    OK, so its not convenient and illegal, but hasn't true safety and privacy always been that way?

    1. Re:The paranoid's method by cjpez · · Score: 2
      OK, so its not convenient and illegal, but hasn't true safety and privacy always been that way?
      Is assuming an alternate identity illegal? I was under the impression that, so long as you're not doing anything illegal, you can use whatever name you feel like. Obviously there'll be some problems using things like credit cards, getting accounts at banks, and all that stuff, but if you're just paying cash for some land, it may not be that big of a deal.

      Then again, I could be wrong. "I heard it from this guy, see?" :P

    2. Re:The paranoid's method by Tassach · · Score: 2

      At least in most places, assuming another name is legal so long as the intent is not to defraud. I can call myself Princess Anastasia if I really want to; but if run up debts under that name, I'm still legally responsible to pay them -- I can't try and say that it wasn't me, it was that other person. I can call my self George W. Bush if I want to, but I can't walk into the bank and make a withdrawl from Curious George's bribe^H^H^H^H^Hcampaign contribution account

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:The paranoid's method by swb · · Score: 2

      Well, my "storage technique" is deliberately designed to falsify ownership of property. To own property you have to do a bunch of government paperwork to update the county land rolls, tax rolls, etc. Deliberately lying on those forms has GOT to be illegal.

      The biggest downside would be the suspicion that would come from the locals. "Who's this guy and why did he buy a parcel of land that's just a bunch of woods"?

    4. Re:The paranoid's method by spacefrog · · Score: 2

      5) ???

      6) PROFIT!

    5. Re:The paranoid's method by cjpez · · Score: 2
      To own property you have to do a bunch of government paperwork to update the county land rolls, tax rolls, etc.
      Ah, yeah . . . When you said "pay with cash" I guess my brain immediately leapt to the conclusion that there wasn't any paperwork to be done, either. Hm.
  51. CD-Rs suck, here is why by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most CD-Rs data material (not CD-RWs), especially cheap ones, are made from a substance that does break down over time. Its like 20-50 years or something, but if you are interested in LONG term storage, CD-Rs are not the way to go.

    I contract for customers that need long term storage and they usually go for either microfilm or optical disk. Optical disks are made of glass and they can survive all but the hottest fires. That would be what I would recommend for the article poster... (they're up to 10gigs a disk so far)

    1. Re:CD-Rs suck, here is why by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, with good PhthaloCyanine discs can last in the hundreds of years. Exposure to UV light of course weakens the reflective layer, as well as the plastic it's stuck in, but so long as you keep them in the case and stored somewhere safely, it's cheap, effective long time storage.

      Microfilms will break down over time too, much by way of the same factors as a CD-R would, for much the same reasons.

      Realistically, in 50 years, if you still needed the data, you'd be moving it onto some sort of super-cybernetic-solid-state-bio-petabyte-storage- device.

      An optical disk lasting 1000 years is all fine and good, but if there's no drive that can read it, it'd just be an obscure relic sitting in a museum somewhere.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:CD-Rs suck, here is why by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Insightful
      An optical disk lasting 1000 years is all fine and good, but if there's no drive that can read it, it'd just be an obscure relic sitting in a museum somewhere.


      Agreed, thats why the hardware upgrades must be factored into the total cost of storage for the life of the information. I can still go get a drive for a disk that was created 20 years ago, if you upgrade your stuff every 5 years or so you will not have this problem
  52. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Informative
    "(I've never seen one live up to the '1000 writes' standard they claim -- more like 3-7)"

    Use good media and use good burners. I'm using Verbatim 4x-10X CD-Rw high speed discs with a top-of-the-line Plextor 40x12x40 drive and the most commonly written one is up to about 20 writes with no loss of data integrity.

    And when the backup really matters, burn at the minimum speed. This will also reduce the chance of loss of data integrity.

  53. keep them with you by jzs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I keep my home backups in my Franklin planner, which is always with me. Keeping backups in a safe deposit box or other hard-to-reach location is guaranteed to fail, as it's too hard to stop by the bank daily. Eventually, I think those USB key rings will be the way to go when their storage capacity increases. You keep your wallet and credit cards safe by keeping them on your body, so why not keep your data on your person too?

  54. A few good practices.. by xchino · · Score: 2, Informative

    Always backup to at least one off site resource, whether it's taking a burnt cd home with you or simultaneously scp'ing data across a corporate WAN to several locations.

    If your data is absolute mission critical, consider investing in some sort of solid state media for backup, as it is normally more reliable than magnetic media.

    But the most important advice I could give to anyone would be..

    NEVER EVER TRUST A FLOPPY

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  55. Hosting Companies by futuresheep · · Score: 2

    I use a hosting company that gives me 500MB of space for $14.95 per month. Gives me space plenty of space to wget things back and forth with, and someone else that will handle doing tape backups.

  56. Broadcast by msheppard · · Score: 3, Funny

    I periodically broadcast all my data to Vega. That way, if I ever have a catastrophic destruction of all the data, I only need to send a faster than light ship towards Vega far enough to recieve the last broadcast. If someone ever gets a sleeping virus into the system... I just send the ship a little futher and get an older backup.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  57. I WORK IN THIS FIELD by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 3, Informative

    My customers need LONG term storage, like over 100 years. My customers use glass optical disks. They hold 10 gigs a piece, do not break down over time like CD-Rs, and being made out of glass they can survive all but the hottest fires.
    Made by Sony and Plasmon

    1. Re:I WORK IN THIS FIELD by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      From their own site Plasmon.co.uk, the optical media only lasts 35 years or so.

      They really arent much better than DVD-R for long term storage, the benefit is fast random access, like a hard drive.

      So they're decent for archival purpose, having last years catalog 'handy', etc, they're not well suited at all to disaster recovery.

      Btw, they aren't 'made of glass' as you said in your parent post, it's like a hard drive platter 'encased' in glass. The heat will corrupt the magnetic media in the core even though the glass shell might survive.

      If you want 'made of glass', talk to a pro production house about fabricating up some glass masters for you, if your pockets are deep enough.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  58. Re:Just an outsider's opinion.. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Generally a lot cheaper and easier to simply have an emergency relocation location; a backup of your server room and equipment, if you will, in a different geographical area. This is commonly done for business that need it, and can afford it.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  59. Cheap offsite storage, how I crave thee... by DesScorp · · Score: 2

    I make sure our backups are done nightly, one tape for each night, with tapes stored in a "fireproof" safe. I take additional measures as well, such as regularly copying important files to other computers in a different area of the facility, and once a month, making a special tape backup and keeping it offsite.

    What I'd REALLY like is cheap online storage. I've checked into it, but our group just can't afford what offsite storage people are asking. It'd be so much easier to just be able to copy our data over a secure connection to another site every night. If the building goes up in flames, hey, last night's data is waiting for you offsite, no problem.

    Oh well. It's GOOD to want things...

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  60. easy by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 2
    What do you do to protect your backups?

    I don't do backups, so i avoid this problem all entirely.

    You know, sometimes you slashdot geeks make things way to complicated.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
  61. It's the restore that counts by jbrownc1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting to see someone thinking beyond the actual act of making the backup. All to often, the sysadmin thinks that getting a backup system up and going, and changing a tape each day, is the end of it. They forget that purpose of a backup is a restore. I've seen it happen over and over that the restore fails because of bad media, corruption, etc.

    Home networks definitely get short shrift. I must admit I don't do an offsite of my home network, but I do burn to CD pretty regularly. Haven't played with the Net backup services. Is there one that folks recommend?

  62. Swap CDs (tapes, et al) with a friend, or FTP by migstradamus · · Score: 2

    "Conserve data, backup with a friend." I regularly back up to a second hard drive and to CD-R. Every month or so I swap backup CDs with my girlfriend on the concept that it is unlikely both of our apartments burn down on the same day. It's an easy low-tech solution to offsite backup as long as you have someone you can trust that you see regularly. Do it with a co-worker or family member.

    Actually, since she doesn't have a burner, she FTPs it to my machine and I burn it, which is another alternative in these days of broadband. Even with capped cable upload speeds she can send a few gigs overnight. Set up an FTP server and swap files.

    If you are just backing up the same stuff, get the old media back each time so you can destroy it yourself.

    Of course you should put some sort of encryption or other protection on your offsite data. Definitely do not include naked pictures of an ex-girlfriend on a backup you are keeping at your girlfriend's house. Just a suggestion.

  63. If you haven't restored, you haven't backed up. by Nkwe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Make sure that whatever you do, you have tested your restore process and done so recently. A backup that can't be read is actually worse then no backup at all. If you have no backup then you don't have the comfy feeling of thinking you have a backup.

    When you test your restore, be sure you test it on a machine and tape drive other then the one you used to create the backup. Tape drives easily fall out of alignment. An out of alignment tape drive will generate an out of alignment tape. A mis-aligned tape may work fine in the drive that created it, but may not be readable on any other tape drive. This does you no good if the only tape drive that can read the tape is in a melted ruin.

    If you are in a Microsoft network environment or any other environment that uses a central security or configuration database, (domain controller, directory server, etc.) don't forget to have a backup plan for that as well. Recovering the data is only part of the battle; you also have to recover the logins, security rights, and all other configuration aspects of your network.

    Did you remember to store a copy of the install media and license codes for your backup software at your off-site location along with your backup media? How about written copies of your hardware and software configurations?

    As others have noted, a safe-deposit box at a bank not too physically close to your computers is an economical option. I use this option for my home network. A down side to this is you can only get to your backup media during the bank's operating hours. If you need better access, a professional off-site storage company may be a better option. Many will pick up, deliver, and manage rotations for you.

    Finally, don't forget that there are other things then fire and flood and natural disasters that can keep you from your physical equipment. Your data may be safe on your servers, but you might not be able to get to your servers if there is a chemical spill, civil unrest, or some other police action happening between you and your equipment.

  64. Multi-dorm distribution by Jester99 · · Score: 2

    My friend in another dorm room keeps a small server there for me hitched up to the network. My computer sends file diffs there every night. The server maintains at least five levels of backups of every file, so they can be rolled back.

    (We've got sprinklers, so it's a good idea that they be in separate rooms. If the whole place goes up in smoke... well, I imagine I could probably get an extension on my term papers.)

    I send it all through an ssh tunnel so it's all nicely encrypted end-to-end. Server runs OpenBSD so (hopefully) it's damned difficult for somebody to crack into.

    1. Re:Multi-dorm distribution by Jester99 · · Score: 2

      Thanks, but my primary system is win 2K.

      I rolled my own system to do the backing up. One of these days I'll clean it up and release it or something.

  65. Depending on what you have for data by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    The quick and dirty way is to just setup a cron job on your work machine that just rsync's all your important stuff (such /home /etc) into a directory strucuture called /machinename_backup (where machine name is your hostname). The inital sync will be very painful depending on your connection and the ammount of data you need to move, but after that it'll be probably under a minute. The trick is todo it often so you suddenly don't just have 3 gigs of new data on your drive all the sudden. I'd recommend doing it every 3 hours or something like that. Also if you want to get fancy and you've got the space you can also setup an aged system, where your script just makes a copy of the previous backup and then syncs to the copy and have a set of 7 of these so it's incremental, so if you screw something up, you can regress. Just ideas...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  66. Daily trip to the bank + logs by sourcehunter · · Score: 2

    We have an accounting clerk take the tape on a daily basis to the bank next door. He also has to sign on a log saying he did it and then someone else comes by, verifies he did it, and then signs next to him on the log.

    --

    quis custodiet ipsos custodes - Juvenal
  67. Well... by devphil · · Score: 2
    Why do o many people use physical back-up-tapes,

    Because tapes are cheap and reliable.

    so that it is boring and time-consuming,

    What the fuck...? You think people actually sit there during the backups, watching the blinkenlights? Backups are automated.

    and so that they don't back-up that often, which they store near the computer, so that they all can burn at the same time,

    *shrug* Maybe they're stupid, but all of that applies to any other backup method too.

    As for "remote site" backups, that only works with small-medium amounts of data, and the more data there is, the less remote the site can be before it no longer is worth it. I'm looking into this option for my home systems, but not for work.

    For several hundred gigabytes, for example, remote sites are just not an option. Hence the nice, fast, automated, reliable tape backups.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  68. Keep a backup in your pocket by TimFreeman · · Score: 2, Funny

    If your backup media are small enough and your pockets are big enough, a reasonable place to keep off-site backups is in your pocket. I can fit CD's into a pocket of the fishing vest I habitually wear, for example. Encrypt any data that you want to stay secret if you're mugged.

  69. My underwear by beta21 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the safest place I know. No woman (unfortunately) or man (thankfully) will ever venture there.

  70. But only for Windows by devphil · · Score: 3, Insightful


    If Connected had a *nix client, they might be worth invetigating. Seriously.

    As it is, I'd have to do a local tar/dump/something of my data, copy the dump file to a Windows partition, boot into Windows, run the Connected program to chunk across this dump file, then reboot back into something useful.

    Thanks, I'll stick with rsync. :-)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:But only for Windows by mesocyclone · · Score: 2

      I use connected.com to backup critical Linux files.

      All it takes is two machines, one running Windows. And these days, there are so many things worth having that are only on windows... why not?

      My linux system periodically creates a tar gz and copies it onto my Windows2000 disk. Late at nite, Win2K uses connected.com to back up my stuff, both the ton of critical windows data and the Linux stuff.

      Works great.

      As mentioned before, restores are a bit slow, but the peace of mind is worth it.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

  71. The Bank by jelle · · Score: 2

    Often, banks have safe storage for you to rent. Some banks even give you a slot for free with a premium checking account.

    Otherwise, maybe keep a set of (encrypted!) disks in your car, so at least it's out of the house. Time to get a DVD-R drive!

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  72. Re:CDRW monthly, network backups, firesafe by Tassach · · Score: 2
    I have ALSO used cheap web hosting that had lots of disk space available and FTP'd files to their server. Probably not the most secure method, but could be cost-effective.
    If security is important, encrypt your backups prior to uploading them. Of course, a cheap web host service probably has no guarantees about reliability / availability / accuracy / etc. Service level agreements drive the cost up significantly.
    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  73. One word by TFloore · · Score: 2

    Hurricane.

    Can you tell I live in Florida?

    The backup at your house, the running version on your lan, and the bank all go the way of the Dodo when that terribly inconvenient Category 5 slams down on top of you. (And no, that's not a roll of network cable I'm talking about.)

    Different branches doesn't help, if they are in the same city. If it's that important, get a safe deposit box at a branch in a city a couple hundred miles away or more. Say, somewhere a good friend or family member lives, so you can stop in when you visit them anyway. No, the backups there won't be updated as often, but they'll be safer from city-level disasters.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
  74. offsite record storage by aderusha · · Score: 3, Informative

    just about any semi-urban city in america has some company that offers off site record storage. this problem isn't new to computers - people have been storing accounting and business records offsite for decades. our service comes to our building every day in a van, carts off a boatload of tapes from the tape library, and returns a month old case to be cycled back into the library. check your local yellow pages, it should be easy to find.

  75. Multiple redundancy. by xenoweeno · · Score: 2

    I slapped a removable drive bay into my computer and picked up two 40gb drives to go with it. Every two weeks I swap them and make a full backup of vital data (pr0n, etc. is always replacable ;-).

    The data is encrypted with public key encryption on the fly as it is copied to the backup drive by piping it through a shell script and other software. I keep the private key on a USB keychain storage unit, whereupon it is also (more weakly) encrypted with a password I ingenuiously store in my brain. ;-)

    The keychain unit is on me at all times. I also have a hard copy of the private key encrypted (more weakly, but with a different password) and uuencoded in a safe deposit box. It'll be a bore to type the page out, if ever necessary, but it'll do the job, and while a piece of paper can be folded/spindled/mutiliated and still be usable, a CD is unusable when broken, and a keychain unit is unusable if magnetic decay visits.

    What do I do with the two drives? Every two weeks I have to fly to a remote office. I drop off the drive with the latest backup with a trusted buddy, and pick up the other drive from him, and the cycle begins anew.

    It's all pretty simple, really.

  76. Practical advice by onyxruby · · Score: 4, Interesting
    First, In a business environment. Your data safe for your media is most likely not intended to protect computer media. It is designed to protect things like papers. As a result, I have heard many horror stories of smoke damage ruining tapes, and heat damage ruining cdr's. What you need to do is to have a smaller safe inside of a larger safe. This provides an additional layer of protection for environmentally sensistive data retention methods.


    Do your incremental backup at least once a day. Do a full backup once a week on two media. Keep one on site and the second offsite at a records retention service like iron mountain. Change out media at least once a year. I have seen sites that have been using the same tape backup tapes for years religously and have literally worn out their tapes. Make sure that you also backup your security keys for your data to a safe deposit box or that offsite data retention company. It is too easy for the key to be safely stored online on an admin station or server that gets burned in the fire.


    Some companies that have very large enterprise data centers will even go so far as to have mirrored backup facilities. These companies effecticely have an entire redundant NOC that is at another physically seperate facility. Treat this much as you would your Internet servers in that you want to make sure that this facility has redundant internet and phone connectivity. Some firms that were wiped out by 9/11 had such facilities available in dedicated host sites and were able to seamlessly transition over within the day. The other firms quickly discovered that such space and facilities were taken by other WTC firms that beat them to the puch. This is by far the most expensive option there is, and is also the most survivable. For a company of sufficeint size though, even a single day down would easily exceed the millions this option can cost. Recommended only for very large operations.


    Another option if you have a campus type facility is to lay underground redundant fiber between buildings. Have your redundant servers and tape backups there. This is very expensive if you have to dig up the ground. However once implemented this is probably one of the cheapest to maintain. Many uni's do this as a matter of course. They have enough data to make the occasional tape back up to offsite facilities impractical. This also allows for much higher speed operations that an internet backup. I have worked with (very large) banking facilities and techs from the various vegas casinos, and this practice is fairly widespread there.


    I have also had a number of facilities that had mirroring in use and never realized that the primary disk had failed and that they had been living off their mirror for some time. So check your mirror every now and then to make sure it isn't running off backup. Also, if you have a raid array, make you have a hot swap /and/ a spare disc available. I have seen a nasty lightning storm take out one disk on an array, only to have the same storm take out another disk a few hours later right after the hotswap had just been put in (server room /was/ on ups and line filtering). Afterall if an environmental condition is sufficeint to take out one disk, it's usually sufficeint to take out or fatally damage another.


    Last and most important. Test your backup! I can't tell you how many times I have worked with people that had backups that were worthless. I have probably referred at least one hundred facilities over the years to ontrack for data recovery when their tape backups, hard disks or raid facilities failed.

  77. Safe Data Practices ... by mikers · · Score: 2

    ... The first thing going through my mind was the need to mail a set of ...

    There is your first problem. To prevent stuff like this going through your mind you need a

    Tin foil hat

    All the data in my head is safe. Is the data in YOUR head safe?

  78. perfect solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    1) when placing your media in the fireproof safe pack so that it'd survive a good fall.

    2) put the fireproof safe in a blasting shell of sorts surrounded by some explosives with a high ignition temp...

    3) you're done! when the fire engulfs the shell your safe is in, the safe itself will be shot outside... your media/backups will be safe & unmelted!

    1. Re:perfect solution... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Awsome! I'd love to be downtown gawking at a fire in a high-rise office building, when suddenly--BOOM! And a small safe comes rocketing out from the 13th floor and craters spectacularly in the middle of the street.

      On second thought, maybe a dumbwaiter-style quick-release elevator shaft that shot the safe down to a foam-filled chamber in the basement might be safer (heh) for rubberneckers and firefighters.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    2. Re:perfect solution... by GT_Alias · · Score: 2
      3) you're done! when the fire engulfs the shell your safe is in, the safe itself will be shot outside... your media/backups will be safe & unmelted!

      At the expense of the poor bloke standing on the sidewalk outside your building window.

  79. Cryptographic File System and some redundancy by LM741N · · Score: 2

    I use CFS on /home, so its just easy to tar up my whole home directory in its encrypted form, and then put it on a CD where I can take it into work, etc. No one will never have any idea what it is. It just looks like jibberish files with jibberish data. Hell, I could put 700Meg of p0rn on it, and keep it in the office at work :)

  80. They make media fireproof boxes too... by gosand · · Score: 5, Interesting
    but can the storage format your putting your data on stand up to the heat?

    Oddly enough, I was just looking into these earlier today. They make media fireproof safes. Most of them I saw say that they will keep the internal temperature uner 125 degrees F, and under 80% humidity. 125 degrees is the melting point of most portable media. They seemed pretty costly, but if you are going to get a fireproof box, why not spend the extra $100 to get one that is media friendly? I saw some decent, albeit small, ones for around $250.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  81. Tattoos, P2P, and Windows98 (follow along) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a book where a computer program (an AI) is converted in to fractal images that are then turned into tattoos. The tattoos are then sold, or given away for free, to lots of people (mainly homeless people because they don't move around much). When the computer gets fried, they go around scanning in as many tattoos they can find and then fill in the missing parts by hand.

    Almost off-topic, but entertaining. ;)

    Me, I find a good data disaster is like a forest fire. It is necessary otherwise I collect too much data. P2P, news, mailing groups, chat logs, mp3, divx, 3GB games (with save files). I'm running out of room faster then my computer is crashing. Maybe I need to return to using Windows98? ;)

  82. I simply ask myself... by fizban · · Score: 2

    What would Jesus use to do his backups? I mean, I already asked myself "What would Jesus drive?" this morning, so it was a logical next step.

    You'd be amazed at what you can discover by just asking yourself what Jesus would do!

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  83. No kidding! by RatBastard · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used to work for a credit union and we had to restore the mission-critical server (HP/UX for those that care) from a tape and teh tape was hosed. We ended up having to restore from a three-day old tape and we had to re-enter three days worth of transactions, on top of having the front line staff deal with live transactions. Very, very not fun.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  84. Encryption is your friend. by photon317 · · Score: 2


    First off, don't bother backing up your whole PC. Just backup the data you really need to keep (individual documents, financial info, source code, etc). This generally amounts to a small amount of data for most people. Compress it, and then encrypt it with a passphrase you can remember. Try not to forget the key.

    Cheap public storage for bytes of computer data abounds. Once your small data is encrypted, you can essentially store it "publicly", all over the place. Open a junk hotmail account, set the password to something trivial you'll remember, and email as an attachment to that hotmail account. Do the same with a couple other free webmail systems. Mail a copy to a couple freinds, say "please save this file somewhere on your harddrive, in case I need it later" and leave it at that. Drop it in some public ftp upload area somewhere. Etc... etc...

    Once you find a list of placse to drop your data off at, make the delivery part of your backup script, just automate sending the emails, etc...

    --
    11*43+456^2
  85. rsync rsync rsync! And offsite... by Alioth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At work, I've implemented an automatic nightly backup. It uses rsync to back the fileserver's files to another machine in the office, and it also rsyncs these files over SSH to one of our remote branches - so we've actually got two backups. The amount of data we have is only a couple of hundred megs (which is a good thing because whilst we have ADSL at the main office, the remote branch only has a 64K ISDN link - and this is why I also keep a local backup as well as a remote. The remote is a disaster recovery backup, the local is so we can recover from 'oh shit I shouldn't have deleted that file' moments without having to retrieve the file over the 64K link).
    This is all done by a cron job when everyone's gone home. No need to mess with physical media and having to remember to do the backups. The cron job makes tarfiles of everything in /home and all the machine's configuration files (smb.conf, squid.conf, everything in /var/named, /etc/passwd and all the usual files). Basically, in the event of our swerver biting the dust, I just want to be able to re-install the OS then untar the backups and go. I've tested it, too - when I put in a new machine for our server, I used the backups to create the new server after installing the OS.

    I do the same thing for home, too (except it backs up over ADSL to my webserver which is a continent away).

  86. Electronic Cooperation by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

    Get a friend who has a server a few hundred kilometers (or more) away from yours.

    Install rdiff-backup (http://rdiff-backup.stanford.edu/). Create a cron job that backs up your critical data.

    Enjoy nightly, incremental, versioned backups. Wanna restore the latest? Easy. Wanna restore last Tuesday's? No Problem.

    Thus, if you're left with a network connection and a machine after the disaster, you can restore the data as fast as your network will allow.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
    1. Re:Electronic Cooperation by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

      Oh... forgot to mention something.

      If you can't trust your friends with your data, you really need new friends. But if you can't get new friends (who have network connected servers) quickly enough, you can always use Ben Escoto's duplicity.

      That's rdiff-backup with GnuPGP encryption.

      Sweet!

      http://rdiff-backup.stanford.edu/duplicity.html

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
  87. Well, since we're talking about home networks... by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...for my personal data, I just burn it to CDs every now & then, and then throw the CDs into the glove compartment of my car. Of course, I'm not backing up pr0n, so all my data fits onto 2 CDs, and since I've already got a few music CDs in the glove compartment, might as well drop the other CDs there too. My car is enough "off site" (I don't park in my house's garage) that the data will be fine if my house burns down. I've never had the summer heat bake the CDs into oblivion, they've always been fine. Low end, sure. But it's good enough for home use.

  88. Intersting Idea for Backup by SirCrashALot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Although expensive, I had an idea for a fireproof system that I might implement if my data ever becomes so important that the backup of my documents on my Jornada is insufficent: Basically, a large moisture safe box in the backyard, with a laptop inside it.
    • First dig a hole ~6 ft deep in the backyard and a small trench leading to it.
    • Then lay a pipe with network and power cables in the trench.
    • Cut a waterproof air vent in the top of the safe: A tube with one of those mushroom hats would be sufficent
    • In the safe have a laptop with a 3 HD RAID-1 (complete mirroring) and a DVD-RW drive.
    • The laptop constantly updates your data on the hard disk, and write your misison critical files to the DVD
    This would be sufficent in my mind barring major EMP Shock/Flooding. (Hopefully the DVD would survive flooding and the safe would be a Faraday cage.
    Just my $0.02
  89. Shameless plug by Servo · · Score: 2

    I work for a company that may be of interest on this topic. We provide managed data storage. Among other things, we provide tape backup storage solutions that include offsite data vaulting.

    Arsenal Digital Solutions

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  90. Lets not overreact now. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 3, Funny

    Data protection measures should be comensurate with the risk.

    Is it 100Gb of a.b.p.e or will your livelyhood be destroyed?

    If your house burns down, making sure you still have copies of your "disgusted from Tunbridge Wells" complaints to Channel 5 will be the least of your worries.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  91. Talk to a neighbor by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 2

    I have an unusual situation, but which can be modified to work for others. We own the house next to ours (low-income neighborhood, $20k house) in which we have offices. The server room is the basement of that house. Since we wanted to share the office DSL line with the home PC's, we buried a cat5 cable between the two buildings, connecting their networks. In addition to providing internet connectivity, it also allowed us to host a backup server at home. All data is stored on the servers in the office, and the backup server (two 120G HD's in a RAID array) backs up all of the computers on a nightly basis.

    Depending on how much you trust your neighbors, you could do something similar, though you'd probably want to use wifi instead of a cable. Take an older PC, install Linux on it, put a large enough hard drive in it, and copy files via SSH, negating the need for any kind of wifi "security." A great product to do this automatically is BackupPC. It supports both Windows and *nix clients, though it uses the unencrypted SMB protocol for Windows boxes. This is what I've been using, and it works great.

  92. One Word: by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2

    Fraud. My bank requires a signature and a date/time be written on a form each time that the box is opened.

    OTOH, my wife would probably have little to lose by committing a little fraud after my murder.

  93. External USB2/1394 hard drive by GooseKirk · · Score: 2

    For home use, you can't beat an external exclosure with a whopping great hard drive. NewEgg has a great one for $76 that's USB2 and Firewire. Keep it in your office and take it home with you once a week, and back up changed files.

    It's offsite, it's fast, it's reasonably cheap, it's easy, you'll know if there's a problem with the media, you can plug it in anywhere and read your files with no special drives or drivers, and you can easily upgrade as you need more space.

    Sure, it's more ghetto than 'leet, but it'll do the trick...

  94. Restore Procedure by Phoenix_SEC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every so often, it's a good idea to do a dry-run of a recovery (on a blank system - NOT your main system). Too many times I've seen people who have current backups that a) are on bad media that was not flagged by the backup procedure or b) only parts are recoverable (e.g., database backups that can only be loaded onto the original system).

    Sadly, I've also seen backup software with bugs that make a full (sometimes even a partial) recovery impossible. Most people just assume that since the computer says it's backed up, it is.. riiight.

    Phoenix_SEC

  95. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by jred · · Score: 2

    You should already have a backup of your mp3s... The original disc :)

    A friend & I have reciprocal online backups. He has space on my server to scp files, & I have space on his. I trust his security much more than I trust my ISPs.

    --

    jred
    I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  96. iPod...they don't use firewire for nothing... by djupedal · · Score: 2

    Put your most important data on your iPod and grab it on your way out the door.

  97. iPod by droleary · · Score: 2

    Given that this is for a home network, the storage needs shouldn't be greater than can fit on something like an iPod, and if an event happens that messes up both your desktop and something on your person, your problems are bigger than a backup can solve. Oh, and an encrypted disk image is your friend!

  98. Linus' way by heikkile · · Score: 2
    Upload on the net, and let the world mirror it :-)

    But since I do not necessarily believe our stuff to be interesting enough for the world, I also rsync it to a central backup server that keeps cp-al's for past seven days, plus four weekly ones. (yes, it has a big disk, even if it is only selected files...). Every night this backup server rsyncs the recent stuff to my home box over ssl for off-site backup. We don't have hurricanes or earthquakes here in Denmark, so I believe 2km must be sufficient distance. We are also setting me up as a secondary DNS, so if the office goes, I can host our website or at least point to it.

    And yes, we have tested the procedures, and recovered accidentally deleted files (but we haven't burned down the office just to see if that works...). All seems to work quite well. And the company pays me a good fat ADSL pipe and some extra disks.

    --

    In Murphy We Turst

  99. my home network back system by bogie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Basically my system is for the cheap and really lazy average user, but it still works fairly well. You'll need to spend some money, but that's just comes with the territory.

    You need either a cdrom burner or tape drive on your server. You should be able to get a used 4/8GB DAT tape drive and scsi card off ebay for $100 max or a 48X burner for around $60. Then you'll need to get some 4/8 dat tapes which are dirt cheap at like $3-5 per tape, or some 50 packs of cdr discs which cost around $15. You'll of course need a hard drive big enough to store all your stuff, but considering you can get a 80GB one off pricewatch for under $100 that shouldn't be a problem. Also I personally use software RAID 1, which is nice, but if your short on funds you can do without it.

    Basically on your server either linux or windows 2000, you have two shares or volumes dedicated just to your data. One is your read-only permenant share of mp3's,docs and crap you've downloaded. This share is readonly as an extra precaution. You can just pull what you need off it and copy it to your temp share if the file has been changed and needs to be backed up. The other is a read/write "temp" share which besides being a area to store New data you've downloaded, is for files you've worked on from your readonly share and as a result now need to be backed up. After they are backed up, you will then move them back to the readonly share.

    On the temp share you will be using a quota system that should come with your OS. You will set this quote for say 650MB for cdrbackup and say 3.75GB if your backing up to a 4/8GB tape drive.

    Now what this system does is stops the most common problem for backups. Since most people A) don't remember to backup and B) just stuff file after file on their server, is stop them cold if they exceed their temp storage space, which now is the same exact size as their backup media. At that point you HAVE to backup, and then you can move those files to your read-only share for further safe keeping. I constantly see people who put off backing up and then realize they have 25 GB that need to be backup up to Cdr. One additional step which although like RAID 1 most people won't due, is to make 2 copies everytime you backup. This is actually really easy and it then allows you to keep one set of backups offsite and one onsite. Offsite can be anywhere, that isn't in your same dwelling.

    This system isn't one I would ever use at a client, but it works well enough, is cheap, and doesn't let the user's datasize grow widly unless they override the quota, which at that point nothing can help them.

    Hopes this helps.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  100. goood God, get a grip by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Funny
    if there is an huge earthquake, nuke,or hurricane that takes out my house and all the local banks, the last thing in the freakin WORLD I'm gona worry about is any silly data on my home system. For the most part, everything but the movies and music can be put on one CD (which I do every once in a while). If my house burned down, I would just say "oh well" to the stupid whatever files on my system. If they were THAT important it would be easy to find a safe place to put them. Hell, start a project on sourceforge, and upload the ultra-top-secret weapons plans or whatever the HELL you have that's so important as an encrypted file. Or...I dunno. Whatever. Get creative. You know, there are aliens at the bank - and they work for the secret government agencies. When you leave, they open your safety deposit boxes and pilfer the info. If you have really important stuff in there, then they cause a hurricane to take out the bank. Its really scary.

    get a grip. How could a person possibly have non-work related data that was truely THAT important that was more than, say, a meg? You know how much TEXT is in a freakin meg? That's right - a million characters :P

    I'm just as paranoid as the next unix admin...ABOUT IMPORTANT DATA...you know, like the data at work that my company has many millions of dollars coming up with. The research equiptment can be replaced, and the public databases can be recovered eventually, but there's some sets of data that is ultra important. But that's REAL data. Just because your computer has a 120Gb drive now doesn't mean you really have backup issues.

    can anyone actually justify this nonsense? Can someone please enlighten me as to why a person would have more than 5 megs of data that they'd need to save in case of emergency? You know...data that you'd be worried about melting? Birth certificates can be replaced fairly easily really, especially when the government knows your house was swallowed by a 500' gorilla that ate your whole town. When that happens, the last thing that you'll need to worry about is your freakin bank statements. Your bank doesn't exist anymore, remember?

    yeesh

  101. Work in the IT Dept. use your employers solution by Calimus · · Score: 2

    I work in the IT Dept. for a large company and I just piggy back my backup tapes and or CD's with the ones from my employer.

    I do this with my Boss's permission of course and the offsite company that stores our data is very nice, I've taken a tour of the facility. The vault is water/fire proof, climate controlled and insured out the wahzoo. Best of all, I don't have to pay for it even though I did offer.

    Those of you that work for companies that use an offsite storage vendor may want to look into something similair to what I did. Even for a small fee it's well worth it.

    I also keep a duplicate set close to home so that I can get to them in a major emergency.

    --
    Trying to be different, just like everyone else.
  102. I'll bet I'm not the only one... by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 2

    who ftp'd a tarball somewhere after browsing this thread.

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  103. Tell me... by Scutter · · Score: 2

    Yes! My tagline *finally* comes in handy!

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  104. FTP it to my box! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    I'll keep a login account for you. All your warez^H^H^H^H^H passwords^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H stuff will be safe, I promise.

  105. Silica Gel - DO NOT EAT by Speare · · Score: 3, Informative

    My firesafe came with a large packet of dessicant for just that reason. If you open the safe on a regular basis, this shouldn't be much of a problem.

    Silica gel is the most common type of dessicant. That's the little packet labeled "DO NOT EAT" in just about any consumer electronics packaging. I've saved the little packets in a jar for years, but I'm sure you can also buy them directly.

    I recommended to a friend who wanted to save some backup CDRs that they put a small firesafe (the kind with a handle) inside a larger firesafe. Put CDRs and silica gel in the smaller one; put hanging folders in the remaining space in the larger one. (The moderate moisture is fine for paper storage when the temperature is rising, but not as good for the CDRs.)

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Silica Gel - DO NOT EAT by meatspray · · Score: 2

      Ahh dessicants,

      Those little packets you see in electronics bags purpose isn't actually to keep you product dry, any sufficient ammount of water able to get all the way in to your package is much more than those poor little nodules can take care of.

      The packets are actually designed to make the product and packaging dry in the first place, sucking any humidity out of the package to begin with. By the time these little guys get to you, they're usually all used up.

      Most dessicants I am familiar with are clear. After they saturate, the tracers become orange or pink, letting you know that they are saturated.

      I've read that you can bake them in the oven to bring them back, but i've never had the need to try.

    2. Re:Silica Gel - DO NOT EAT by dildatron · · Score: 2

      interesting - i did not know that, but it makes sense once you think about it (the moisture has to go somewhere...).

      If I am every really really bored I will try baking dessicants and let you guys know the results.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
  106. My Firewire backup system on OS X by scout.finch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've worked up a decent and simple backup system for my OS X G4 at home. It could use a little more in terms of updating key directories a few times a day, but:

    1) I took a 5.25" external CD-ROM Firewire case
    2) Put in cheap-ass removable drive-sled sytem
    3) Put 2 60GB drives in sleds
    4) Bought one of those $250 media safes, put it next to my desk
    5) Have Dantz Retrospect backup to the Firewire drive nightly my entire system
    6) Occasionally open the safe, take out the other drive and swap it for the existing one.

    This is all because I'm lazy so off-site won't happen. The safe weighs about 80 pounds and the lock is cheap but would take a bit of effort to open (more than nothing). So if the computer nukes, I'm backed up to last night. If someone breaks in and smashes/steals everything in a junkie rage the safe is probably more annoying than it's worth.. backed up to a few days ago. Ditto for fire as long as it isn't a total multi-hour inferno.

    Simple, not too expensive, and simple/reliable. You could also use Retrospect or Apple Backup to backup key files and document directories over the net throughout the day as well.

  107. Get Real by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2

    Let's differentiate between personal data and business data. If we're talking about a business and the data is required for the business to reasonably run, that business had better come up with a decent disaster recovery plan including keeping their data at a secure, off-site location.

    Now let's talk personal data. Face it, most of the data we're talking about would be, at worst, an inconvenience if lost. You can get copies of most everything we're talking about from say your bank or the government, etc. if there is a problem and the value of the data is just the amount of inconvenience it would cause to jump through whatever hoops are required to get a copy of it. Likewise, most of this data is of little or no value to anyone else (other than maybe someone trying to pull off identity theft). So you can probably be fairly safe by simply keeping a spare copy of the CD-RW or whatever your backup media of choice is in your desk drawer at work or a locker there, at a friends house, etc.

    There are exceptions to what I'm suggesting (e.g., someone who runs a business out of their house) but, for most people, just keep a copy of your backup some place besides where the system is that your backing up. Believe me, your life isn't that interesting that anyone really wants to steal your backup.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  108. Oh get real by Proc6 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Sorry, as someone who's been through a fire, I must rant.

    Oh for the love of God, we're talking about someone's personal home backups. Im pretty sure no one needs daily copies of all their data at 300 mile seperated bank branches. Who are you that your data is that important, Jesus? I think the original question of the article was based around home backup methods. If you own some massive business in the WTC, trust me, youll have better alternatives. A place I know takes a set of tapes down to salt mines in Kansas City every single day, where they're practically oblivious to every kind of catastrophe that leaves most of humanity intact. If this is for home, just dump your drive once in awhile to some CDRs or DVDRs and put them at work or something. Trust me, I lived through a fire in my home (total loss, not just some kitchen fire), and the last thing I was concerned about was my mp3s. What about your wife's wedding dress? What about your pets? Children? All your legal documents? What are you doing to do, keep your grandpa's world war 1 pocket watch in a kryptonite box in a vault at NORAD? Shit happens. If youre one of the 98% youll probably go through life without a single catastrophic disaster, if you have one, we'll, youll pick up the pieces and start over and you'll realize pretty quickly how really little mose of those 0's and 1's mean in the grand scheme of things.

    If you have some REAL important shit at your house, chances are it doesnt change daily. Burn it to CD and send a copy to grandma for Christmas once a year if it makes you sleep better at night, but keeping 10 copies of everything across 300 miles of bank safes, and spending $1000 on a firesafe to protect $2 in JPEGs, its all just really retarded when you actually go through a loss like that.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  109. Use cookies by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2

    Many are worried about ensuring that your backup is at great distance from your machine, but complain about the effort of taking it elsewhere.

    The obvious answer is to back your data up, in lots of tiny pieces, in cookies stored on the PCs of everyone that visits your web site. Your only problem is to then get enough hits.

    I suppose that restoring might be interesting, but work that out when it happens -- disasters only happen to other people :-)

  110. Cowboy Neal... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

    ... is my backup repository.

    --
    That is all.
  111. Safr place for your safe by MountainLogic · · Score: 3, Informative
    A couple of things to keep in mind for safes:

    1) Put the same in the basement. In fires heavy things such as safes will loose support and crash into the basement and crack open.

    2) Suround the safe with non-flamable mass (cindar blocks). Or better yet, install the safe the "wall" of your basement.

    3) Put your media in zip lock bags. Sure, the media may be intact, but it only takes a tiny bit of crud to trash magnetic media. Smoke particles are often ionized and will bond tighter to your disk than the mag particles.

    1. Re:Safr place for your safe by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Not only that, but in the event of a fire, the basement is the area least likely to be engulfed (fire tends to go UP, remember).

      Modern cinder blocks crack all to hell in high heat, and are extremely poor insulators. Solid concrete is somewhat better. But I'd suggest solid-sheet asbestos fireplace backing, if you can find any. (It's only dangerous if powdered.) I can tell you from firsthand experience that it will keep dry plywood from igniting when there's a 1500 degree fire making an iron stove glow red, only 6 inches away from the wood.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Safr place for your safe by gorilla · · Score: 2

      You can get fireproof ceramic sheets for asbestos replacements and new installations which need heat isolation. Much safer and possible to buy from any building supply store

    3. Re:Safr place for your safe by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Probably better when you don't know how cleanly it'll be handled, yes. But ceramic still doesn't have the insulative factor of asbestos -- it's absolutely amazing. Wonder if you can get asbestos embedded in the ceramic??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  112. Safe Deposit Box by Mr_Person · · Score: 2

    I was thinking about the same questions a while ago and came up with a solution that I think is pretty good. Once a month I make a backup of my fileserver on a CD-R, then I drop it off at my safe deposit box. I keep about 5 months back just in case. The advantage to using the safe deposit box is that it doesn't cost anything (I already had the box), it's close by (better than mailing), and the bank gets to worry about security, fire-proofing, etc. instead of me.

  113. a big wooden box... in a big warehouse by schuss42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    i've got a box at "public storage" for extra household junk, christmas lights, the styrofoam that my tv came in... all sorts of good crap. it's a big wooden crate stacked up in a climate-controlled, secure warehouse. i have the padlock key that locks it up - i mailed the other to my sister, and keep an unmarked spare. plus i need to present my id each time. i can have access to it on a few hours notice 6 days a week. since i already had it, seemed like a good place for backups.

    i chose CD-R, cause
    (a) they're cheap enough that i don't feel guilty backing up *everything*
    (b) i burn a new one each time, and keep the old ones in there, in case the august file is corrupt, the july one might not be, etc.
    (c) they're not that big, and file nicely.
    (d) if you buy decent ones, they have a good shelf life.

    one other note of offsite storage - a disk cataloger app, so i can figure out what i've got in storage *before* i go down there!

  114. step zero is to decide what to back up. by twitter · · Score: 2
    No, really, figure out what's important. There are only two things I worry about preserving through a fire at home. Pictures and projects. The most important pictures, I give to relatives and people who'd like to look at them. The most important projects can be brought to another location, like your office or a safte deposit box. The best projects are things I'd like to share anyway, so once again publication rules. All the rest of it can go up in smoke.

    For me, if it's not worth sharing, it's not worth worrying about. Bills, records, mass produced crap can all be replaced with a reasonable home insurance policy. If you've taken the trouble to present things to others, it's going to be some of your best work. Interestingly enough, publication aids survival.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  115. What I do by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 4, Funny

    My carefully laid out program for backing up my data consists of these two steps:
    1. If I have no space left on any harddisk, burn some of it to a CD.
    2. Ehhh... ok, not two steps...

  116. Backup to /. by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    or more interesting.. get the "snow" steganography program.. it (somehow -- still blows my mind) inserts binary into text using whitespace encoding. you can insert your gpg'd tarballs into spoofed journal entries created with the Sugar Plum junk HTML generator. You even have built-in timestamps!

    Of course, they may only keep the last 25 comments... hmm... it still seems like all this could be easily scripted with perl.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  117. Note to IBM'ers by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    And there should be plenty in here. We all have corporate-sponsored (and backed up) Intranet webdrives on reserved under our Intranet names with sharing ACLs tied to bluepages. I have stored gigs up there. You can also get a GSA drive on the Intranet that starts you off with 10GB of space. All officially supported and useful for storing copies of critical data in case a taxi runs over your Thinkpad.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  118. Re:Firesafe not good for data... by Excarnate · · Score: 3, Informative

    You, sir, are an ass.

    If your house burns down, it will burn for a short time until the fire department puts the fire out. And even if it takes time for the entire house to burn, the portion with the safe will likely be Real Hot for a relatively short time (per this informative FAQ).

    And your safe might not even be near the fire.

    And although a safety deposit box is a good idea for level 0 or level 1 backups, what is the point of it being insured wrt data storage?

    Next time you call someone names, know what you are talking about. And a "fireproof" safe can be a good part of an entire data safety plan.

    What bothers me about all the people stating "get a fireproof safe" is that NO ONE has said if the normal kind actually work (or not) for protecting media from a fire. One person said he heard horror stories, but that's it. Ref. the previous FAQ link.

    And please, if you get a "fireproof" safe, consider bolting it to something strong (e.g. cement in basement) because having someone steal your computer and your backups sucks!

    --
    .signature: No such file or directory
  119. Secure AND Private AND Destructible by fishbowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sometimes in business, especially military and intelligence business,
    it is important to have your data be Secure, both in the "eyes only" sense and in
    the "safe from fire/flood/earthquake/mayhem/attack" sense.
    However, it is also very often important that this data be surely and accountably
    DESTROYED. These two seemingly oppositional goals must really make for
    interesting practices in some environments. I need backups, and I also
    need a way to guarantee that all backups are destroyed on command as well, because,
    while the data is to be disposed of, it is not to be
    disposed of until the order is given, at which point, it
    must be disposed of, let's say, with the consequences being
    court-martial or summary execution if it doesn't happen.
    (I'n not just thinking about the kind, gentle, USAn military
    here :-)

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  120. How about automatic p2p plus offsite backups? by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 2

    A safe deposit box, as somebody else mentioned, is a good idea in theory (and potentially in practice - I use one myself). However, the big problem that makes it and so many other backup strategies inadequate in practice is that it requires manual intervention and most people aren't going to use these mechanisms frequently enough. Most of the people I've talked with in small businesses backup maybe once a month (to tape, zip disk, CD, etc), if they're lucky. That's unfortunate because there's really no reason why you should be backing up any less frequently than every day your data changes...

    I've been working on some software for awhile that provides a simple, automated solution. At the core it's peer to peer backup software, so all your computers will backup to each other. To protect against things like fire and theft, it also gives you the option to backup offsite to third party servers. So you could back up the bulk of your data via p2p (very fast, cheap, and easy) and backup your critical stuff offsite (still cheap and easy and potentially fast depending on the amount of data). I have a test version out now and I'm going to be releasing another test version in a few days, so email me if you're interested. And yes, there is a Linux version.

  121. Error propagation by xixax · · Score: 2

    But what's your *backup* policy?

    What do you do when you realise that bonehaded mistake has been instantly sychronised across every instance of your data?

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
    1. Re:Error propagation by PD · · Score: 2

      Not possible. Unison will not do that. Have you tried the program? I just type "unison". Not much to screw up there.

      (But I do keep a copy on CD both at work at home, encrypted.)

  122. Crypto, CDs and friends by xixax · · Score: 2
    I use a CD backup script written by a member of the local Linux user group. It creates as many CDs as it takes (filled with ~35 x 20 Mb GPG encrypted .tgzs). Just run it against /home and pop in another blank whenever the drive ejects. Leave encrypted CD set at friend's house. Very simple to use, I can send each new backup set to a different friend.

    Want to know more about it?

    Of course my MP3 collection is quite a bit larger than my /home.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  123. BBQ'd hard drives by Reziac · · Score: 2

    In a Previous Article on backups, we discussed the impracticality of the average user backing up a very large HD with anything but another equally large HD.. starting from that premise as our backup method:

    I know of two incidents where a hard disk survived (with data intact) a fire inside the computer's case (one flaming power supply, one flaming modem from a lightning strike). I'd guess data damage may not be so much due to high temperature, as whether the HD receives a thermal shock by being heated too fast, or if gets warped due to being heated too unevenly. A safe might be useful in that it would heat up and cool down relatively slowly and uniformly, so would give the data platters a chance to adapt. (Obviously a stored HD's heads will not be writing data at the time of the theoretical fire, so misread/miswritten data is not the issue.)

    Anyone got a garage, a safe, and a HD they'd care to sacrifice in the interests of science? :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  124. workable solutions? by alizard · · Score: 2
    As for me, it would be a pain in the ass to reload the OS, reinstall the shrinkwrap apps, and remember and download all the utilities I use. I'm doing journalism these days, and the research, notes, and project ideas I've collected over the last 13 years on my HD are simply irreplaceable. What price on a large chunk of my life's work?

    Near-line storage on a HD in a mobile rack. (I paid less than $10 for mine) UNPLUG THE TRAY and put it somewhere else when not actively backing up or restoring. If that $9 power supply suddenly decides to feed your motherboard AC line voltage or your motherboard announces it's got the low-quality electrolytic cap problem by exploding, having your backup HD plugged in at the time is A BAD IDEA.

    Burn a pile of CD-Rs every month (replace with DVD-Rwhatever when the format war ends) and mail them to a friend across the country. If a simultaneous disaster wipes out both locations out, there probably won't be any survivors to care. If security is a concern, PGP-encrypt the disks before sending. (for this, I suggest one-way encryption and try REAL hard to remember the passphrase.)

    I prefer tape, but I've had problems getting backups back from tape. I used to have a Sony Superstation. Data verified perfectly during backups for a year and a half. Worked fine until my HD crashed. After some work with Customer Service, I managed to get about 95% of my files back, but the point behind getting a tape drive is... reload and you're running. While Ecrix or LVO drives are probably sufficiently stable/reliable to trust in, the price tag on either is ... rather high.

    The fireproof safe isn't *that* bad an idea, even if humidity is a concern, just plop your CDs or HD rack in a plastic bag or a sealable metal strongbox with a silica gel packet inside. If the bag or box melts, chances are, your CDs will be melting shortly anyway. But having copies of the data somewhere else is more cost-effective. CD-Rs are cheap. Safes aren't.

    The people who have their backups stored only a few miles away are gambling. Most areas have their own characteristic set of major disasters. I live in an earthquake zone. Others live in areas where hurricanes are popular. No coastal area is immune to tsunamis, even if this is a once-in-a-lifetime or longer scenario, "this only happens once in a long while" doesn't help if that's NOW. Areas that are considered seismically stable can become otherwise. Most people go through their lifetimes without having their homes or businesses burn down. Is this a reason to neglect fire insurance?

    Online backup via commercial storage facility is only a reasonable solution for broadband users. Imagine retrieving even a 20G zipfile via dialup. I get 4667 cps on a *good* connection. You're also betting that the network connect between wherever you are and wherever your backup is will stay intact in the event of a major disaster. I'll assume anyone reading this is encrypting before sending the data out using your own crypto software, not theirs to remove the issue of trust. If you're figuring on retreiving the data via Fed Ex, why not simply send the disks? Note that if the problem is enterprise class, then making backups at 2 or more of the major facilities (out of courtesy, I'll assume redundant backbone connections at each site) on the network becomes reasonable.

    Incomplete... (Score:1)
    by Distan on Thursday November 21, @04:15PM (#4726118)
    (User #122159 Info)

    Your data backup isn't complete unless you could be up and running after having all of your computer equipment seized, your safety deposit boxes frozen, and search warrants served on all of your known friends and family members.

    Maybe there is some sort of "off-shore" backup service in business?

    Distan is right, but I haven't come up with a good answer for how to handle his problem. It isn't possible to rent a storage space from a regular storage space provider on a cash only - no ID basis anymore, at least not around here, and if a manager of such a facility is corruptible enough to do business against the rules, can he be trusted with your data? I don't mean not to read it, I mean to have the disks when you call for them. If the guy's a friend of yours, that's the "known associate" problem.

    If the government (yours, wherever you are) comes up with a sufficiently plausible excuse, they can get the government local to wherever your backup records are to seize them from whoever they're stored with if one, so international isn't a really adequate solution.

    Who's got some better ideas?

  125. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Interesting re the CDRWs. I wondered about their durability; this does not sound good.

    How about if CDRWs are used as single-write CDs, never rewritten? how long can they be expected to last?

    I've got a client who bought CDRW blanks by mistake (way too long ago to return 'em), and I could not convince him to spend more money on CDR blanks. Lacking better options, I did his backups on the CDRW blanks, but as closed single-session like one would for CDRs. (No idea if they're still rewritable, but the object was to prevent 'em from being altered, if possible. I don't use CDRW blanks myself so don't really know if it worked.)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  126. Paranoia. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2
    At my company, we have a network operations center (NOC) that sports about 100,000 dollars worth of hardware on 8 racks. This is all inside an unmarked brick room with strong metal doors at the center of the main building. The racks are raised 18 inches off the ground in case of flood. They have an angled roof with ducts to drain any water that might spill from above. The room is temperature controlled and kept at a constant 60 degrees. An industrial-strength chemical fire protection system, similar to a fire extinguisher but on a much larger scale, will emit a large amount of foam-like material to put out a fire if one occurs. This exists throughout the building and includes the NOC.

    Only the two admins who have the root passwords, and the company CEO, have the keys to this facility.

    Three copies of incremental backups are made each day on CD-R discs. Generally, the backup takes up a single disc. If large changes have taken place, a second disc may be required, but this is very rare. The first copy is placed on a shelf located in the room. Its purpose is the fast retrieval of files in the event of deletion. The second copy goes home with one of the sysadmins. (The sysadmins take turns each day.) The third copy goes home with the company CEO. To reduce the number of CD-Rs stored, three copies of full backups are made on the 12th day of each month, or the following business day. (Don't ask me why that day was selected.) Each of these three copies can take up to 17 CD-Rs, and the number is growing slowly. One copy is kept in the NOC. One is placed in a safe-deposit box at a bank. One is taken home by the company CEO.

    Additionally, a "backup" system exists at a separate location, also protected, which cost the company approximately $20,000. It is similar to the "real" setup and can perform the same functions but on a smaller scale. If the main system is destroyed for whatever reason, the company can activate the backup system within a matter of minutes to provide interim services while the main system is brought back online. When the main system is taken offline for maintainence, all operations take place through the backup system. Additionally, tests are performed once a month (by switching to the backup system) to ensure that it works properly. The two systems are synchronized before and after each such switch.

    Obviously, my company has taken the paranoid approach to protecting data.

  127. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Sheetrock · · Score: 2
    For what it's worth, I've got a couple of three-year-old CD-RW backups that are still readable today that I made side-by-side with CD-R at the time to test them out. I've heard recent CD-RWs are more reliable, but as I mentioned I've had one experience too many with supposedly-good backup media failing on restore because it was pushed well beyond its limits.

    Based on my extremely small experience with CD-RWs for medium-term backup, I'd trust the backup. At least, I'd trust it enough in a situation where I'd advised a client to put out another, say, $40 or so to alleviate risk and he refused my suggestion. I've heard some early (first-gen?) CD-RWs were unreliable to the point where they wrote fine, read fine, then a week later lost a bunch of data. I've heard recently here on Slashdot that a fellow who made his own TiVo type unit that could dump VCDs to CD-RW got something like 3-7 writes before the media got unacceptably screwy.

    It's probable the backups you did will be just fine. Personally, I'd rely on them no more than a year or so if they were pristine and kept away from light and cigarette smoke, and I wouldn't reuse them for backups at the end, but this is just gut feeling. If made properly (and hopefully burned at slower than max speed, like 1X-4X), they'll last much longer, but the manufacturers muck too much with the composition of the things to permit me any real feeling of reliability even with a particular brand.

    The blanks you've made are rewritable, but the user has to choose to blank the disc first, so it isn't likely someone is just going to drop the disc in the tray and blithely dump a new session over the backup.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  128. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Reziac · · Score: 2

    In looking at the media, CDRW *look* like they're denser. And I've noticed that the less-transparent and more solidly-backed CDRs read faster in old hardware (enough to notice), probably due to stronger reflectivity. So my initial thought was that CDRW media *should* be more reliable/more readable -- but I've had strange experiences with trying to write CDRWs (lots of fails for no good reason, whereas CDRs rarely fail -- in fact the Plextor *never* failed until TurboTax forcibly installed IE5.5, which FUBAR'd lots of stuff incl. the CDRW).

    The guy I made the backup for didn't have the first clue how to use the CDRW (older Sony, of somewhere around the 6x era), so one can hope that he won't try something silly like writing over his backup! The disk read just fine immediately after, which I suppose is a good sign. I'll probably be doing his next backup in due course, and I can simply refuse to write over the old one :)

    In my experience, given good quality blanks, data that fades in the next few weeks or months is an early symptom of a CDRW unit that's going tits-up. Have had enough evil adventures with failing Yamaha drives (never again!) to be fairly well convinced of that.

    For myself, I just have too much data -- CDRs get silly in a hurry. Have been thinking about a RAID1 server with no mission in life except to mirror my other machines. I suppose I could string power and a network cable to my shop building and put it out there, under the theory that house and shop aren't likely to burn down at the same time :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  129. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by peter · · Score: 2

    > So my initial thought was that CDRW media *should* be more reliable/more readable.

    CDRs have ~0.8 or 0.9 times the contrast of a pressed CD. CDRWs have ~0.6 or 0.7 times the contrast. They're harder for non-Multiread hardware to deal with.

    --
    #define X(x,y) x##y
    Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  130. Re:Make sure your backup methodology is good to st by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Interesting. Tho I'd guess it varies much more radically for CDRs -- as I've noted, the ones that are more opaque (better backing, more visible reflectivity) read considerably faster in old hardware. Enough to really notice in a 4x.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?