Slashdot Mirror


Ten Years of Web Browsing

AnamanFan writes "Today in 1993, a group of students at the University of Illinois released a little program called Mosaic. News.com.com.com has a special four-part series on the anniversary. I for one will celebrate by spending extra time with Mozilla and Camino." Slashdot marked the anniversary a little while ago.

270 comments

  1. Really? by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Who would have guessed that so much would change in a decade?

    1. Re:Really? by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who would have guessed that so much would change in a decade?

      No kidding, I just saw a blink tag yesterday...

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:Really? by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

      Those were the days where all code was between H tags and every body thought blink was the coolest thing since sliced bread...

    3. Re: Really? by ralico · · Score: 1

      Donkey: "Really?"
      Shrek: "Really Really, Donkey."

      --

      SCO to Hell
    4. Re:Really? by Fulkkari · · Score: 2, Funny

      No kidding, I just saw a blink tag yesterday...

      Did it say "coming soon"?

      --
      I demand the Cone of Silence!
    5. Re:Really? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      doesn't work in a lot of modern browsers. I wonder why....

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    6. Re:Really? by F1_Fan · · Score: 1

      It took a few more years but I nearly popped a woody when IE3(?) introduced the MARQUEE tag. Now that was cool. ;)

  2. Web browsing? So what! by corsec67 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who cares when web browsing started.

    The more important question is when did the first porn site start?

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    1. Re:Web browsing? So what! by binaryDigit · · Score: 1

      Well if you're talking websites, it probably started about 2 minutes after Mosiac was available for download. After all, there was all that bbs material that now found itself a new home.

    2. Re:Web browsing? So what! by Senjutsu · · Score: 1

      The more important question is when did the first porn site start?

      That afternoon. Knowing college students, it was probably the first thing they created.

    3. Re:Web browsing? So what! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, we don't just think about porn. drinking is up there too. well, ok porn is #1. but only cause women aren't that easy in reality and beer is expensive.

    4. Re:Web browsing? So what! by cyrax777 · · Score: 2, Funny

      or when was the first person spammed?

    5. Re:Web browsing? So what! by stanmann · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that there were Gopher sites that were "adult".

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    6. Re:Web browsing? So what! by meloneg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or when was the first person spammed?
      Um, it's rather well known when SPAM started.

    7. Re:Web browsing? So what! by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

      Now now, it is a well-known fact that all web-browsers came into being to make Mahir Cagri's website a reality. www.ikissyou.org says it all.

      Have a spleen, hug a troll.

    8. Re:Web browsing? So what! by wheany · · Score: 1

      About 5 hours before the web was invented.

    9. Re:Web browsing? So what! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 5, Funny

      The more important question is when did the first porn site start?

      Come back tomorrow, when we'll be celebrating the 10-year anniversary of THAT.

    10. Re:Web browsing? So what! by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      About 5 hours before the web was invented.

      What, so Al Gore invented the term "pr0n" as well?!? Damn that guy is a genius. Why didn't he get elected president? Oh... wait... nevermind...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    11. Re:Web browsing? So what! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like the 20'th aniversery. BBS! Don't forget the BBS. the fidonet! Don't forget younguns.

    12. Re:Web browsing? So what! by Azathoth_lca · · Score: 1

      The web =! the internet. Plenty of porn on usenet long before there were web browsers. And there was ASCII-art porn before that.

    13. Re:Web browsing? So what! by Azathoth_lca · · Score: 1

      syntax error in parent post corrected below... web != internet. There was plenty of porn on usenet long before there were web browsers. And there was ASCII-art porn before that.

    14. Re:Web browsing? So what! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the web had a killer feature -- binary transfers.

      At least the first time I ever saw the Web was when a pornhound friend was using the www linemode browser and excited that he didn't have to UUDECODE.

    15. Re:Web browsing? So what! by Glytch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know, but I do remember how pissed off myself and a few friends were in junior high when we spent an hour downloading a jpeg off of Playboy, and found out that Mosaic didn't have jpeg support after the download was finished.

      My god, I feel old now.

    16. Re:Web browsing? So what! by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I can recall DL'ing photos of hot chicks (Lena, natch) from the PLATO system in 1979.

    17. Re:Web browsing? So what! by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      yeah, remember back in uni in 94 - 95, got all my, uh, 'data' from gopher.

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  3. Where was my post? by CodeHog · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I saw an editoral written up in the Chicago Trib last week about Mosiac celebrating 10 years and submitted it to /.

    --
    Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    1. Re:Where was my post? by CodeHog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, here it is.. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/oped/ch i-0304180093apr18,1,4617305.story by Dan Reed

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
  4. if only they had known... by Ratphace · · Score: 5, Funny


    what a bloated piece of crap webpages would have become, they might have abandoned the idea... :)

    1. Re:if only they had known... by strateego · · Score: 5, Funny

      Where people with no knowledge on a subject can come, post, and pretent they know more than everybody else. (SLASHDOT.ORG)

    2. Re:if only they had known... by Red+Warrior · · Score: 1

      and skipped directly to Flash.

      --
      "If, therefore, any be unhappy, let him remember that he is unhappy by reason of himself alone."
      ~Epictetus
    3. Re:if only they had known... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "what a bloated piece of crap webpages would have become, they might have abandoned the idea... :) "

      Ever notice how bloated Slashdot is? FP tags, Ogg tags, Beowulf tags, MSSUX tags... Slashdot could do with a good spring cleanin!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:if only they had known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You took the words right out of my mouth.

    5. Re:if only they had known... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      P tags, Ogg tags, Beowulf tags, MSSUX tags...

      Actually it's funny you mention that. I didn't see a single "In Soviet Russia, iPods make a Beowulf cluster of you" kinda jokes in the iPod story a day or two ago. I hope that trend means it's finally coming to an end.

      Oh, errr... nevermind.

      /me runs and hides.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    6. Re:if only they had known... by NickFitz · · Score: 1


      Slashdot will be closed this Thursday, as it is necessary to shut it down and clean it once a year.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
  5. Reminisce by yotto · · Score: 5, Funny
    Ahhh, I remember it like it was, well, 10 years ago. World Wide Web? Right, It'll never catch on. We've already got gopher and ftp, what else do you need?

    Oh, how little I knew.

    1. Re:Reminisce by Brandon+Sharitt · · Score: 1

      I didn't start until around 94 or 95(remember Netscape 2?), although the www was still young then. Now it just has a different feel to it.

    2. Re:Reminisce by R.o.Q. · · Score: 1

      I gotta agree with you. When I first looked at Mosaic and the Web, I figured it was just a "gopher-like" information system, nothing more. At the time, I only looked at text-only browsers and thought, "how cumbersome is this???"

      I occasionally kick myself for not spending a few more hours thinking out of the box on this, and realizing where the medium could go...

    3. Re:Reminisce by rsheridan6 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I recall getting on yahoo, surfing all the interesting links in one night, getting bored and going back to usenet news.

      Yeah, this web thing is a nice idea, but it'll never go anywhere without any content.

      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    4. Re:Reminisce by TopShelf · · Score: 1
      I remember a buddy of mine at the time likened the web to the CB radio fad of the 70's.

      Everybody now!

      We've got a big ole convoy, cross the USA... Convoy...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    5. Re:Reminisce by countzer0interrupt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Now it just has a different feel to it.
      I know exactly what you mean. I only "surfed" for the first time in 1996, but the Web definitely felt less commercial, and more homely. Back then most of the web sites had a home-made quality to them, and viewing the HTML source showed an awful lot was written by hand (as opposed to web-authoring software, Flash or CGI).

      You had the big name commercial sites back then of course (e.g. Microsoft), but even sites like Yahoo! felt like they were made by a bunch of fanatical semi-professionals, as opposed to some big corporation with big buildings and big salaries.

      People used phrases like "home page", "surf the net" and "send me e-mail", and they all take me back to a time when the Web was more innocent, before every company, shop, charity or celebrity had their own "web-presence". The Web felt less tainted by greed. Now the feeling I get from the Web is a lot more like that I get in a shopping mall, where I'm constantly having to question people's motives and the veracity of information I'm getting. In '96 you knew with 95% certainty that the Michael Jackson fansite you were checking out was put together by a dedicated fan with all the pedantry and attention-to-detail that goes with it, so you tended to trust what you were reading a bit more.

      Ok, I'm not saying that the Web was good then, and it's nothing but evil now. I'm not saying that the fantastic, informative, enjoyable, insightful sites are not there - just that they're a bit harder to find. I'm not saying that the Web is no longer a tool for free-speech and free-thinking, because as long as the standards that define the Web remain public, open and [relatively] anonymous we will still have this amazing playground for the groupmind.

      Right, I'd better go, my pizza's rapidly cooling. :-)
    6. Re:Reminisce by Brandon+Sharitt · · Score: 1

      Yeah I remember just surfing the web. The early days were the golden age of Geocities, before the tried to squeeze every last cent out of it. I learned most of my HTML skills just by looking at other peoples HTML code. Now that doesn't really help at all.

    7. Re:Reminisce by 2short · · Score: 1


      I had my first job out of college at the time. I was tasked with setting up online access to social science data holdings information for a large university (a specialized card catalog essentially). I was instructed to start by figuring out how to set up a gopher site, and "check out this http thing while you're at it" (i.e. my well informed uber-geek boss had not heard the term World Wide Web). I soon told them to forget about gopher, which took some convincing, but then we went ahead. So I always feel real savvy about that; OTOH, A short while into the project Mosaic came out, and I thought "Why would anyone want that, what I've got is just as good." (What I had was a text only browser where the links were numbered so you could type the number of the one you wanted to follow. The latest version supported the bold tag, and there was talk of italics coming soon! Even at that state though, it was clear it was gopher was dead) Ahh, the good old days, when you wanted a browser, you got it from a high-energy physics lab, of course.

    8. Re:Reminisce by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was yahoo still at "stanford.edu" then?

    9. Re:Reminisce by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    10. Re:Reminisce by dr_canak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Back in 94, I had heard about Mosaic and Netscape, but had no idea what they were or what they did, let alone what the World Wide Web was. I had just scratched the surface of Gopher, but that was the extent of my online experience.

      Anyway, had just gotten a job as a sys admin for a small academic department and got a binary of netscape to run on our sun sparc classic. Like everyone else, I thought it was remarkably cool, but there was so little content i never really understood its utility. Long story short... One thing that was cool was something called "Edgar" (i think), that had real time stock quotes on it. When i showed it to our department chair, he could not get past the fact it was free, and insisted that I immediately shut the server down for fear that our department would get billed for the information that was appearing across the screen.

    11. Re:Reminisce by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I remember the first time I used lynx. It was incredibly confusing having the gopher menus scattered in amongst a whole lot of other text. It wasn't until Mosaic came out (actually it wasn't until the win32s support for OS/2 got good enough to run Mosaic, which was a couple of months later) that I actually got it.

    12. Re:Reminisce by frankie · · Score: 1
      even sites like Yahoo! felt like they were made by a bunch of fanatical semi-professionals, as opposed to some big corporation

      That's because Yahoo was made by a bunch of fanatical amateurs. It was originally just a grad student experiment that outgrew the lab.

      I'm sure I'm not the only one here who remembers where they were the day they clicked their Yahoo bookmark and saw it redirect to an evil .com address. That's the exact moment when dotcom mania began.

    13. Re:Reminisce by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      it'll never go anywhere without any content.

      Little did you know how wrong you were

    14. Re:Reminisce by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not only a shopping maul^H^H mall, but also a ghetto of street vendors, glaring neon lights, cheap knockoffs, streetwalkers, bad drivers, gutter refuse, and mad dogs peeing on your leg...

      One reason I use an old browser (NS3.04, js and images off, no plugins) by *preference*, is that it strips out 90% of the useless noise and leaves behind the useful content. After all, some of the best toys in the playground are the simplest ones. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:Reminisce by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      I recommend mozilla with everything disabled. Mighty nice.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    16. Re:Reminisce by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I do have Mozilla here (I found 0.99 beta more stable than later releases, so kept it) and use it for when a site flat won't work without flash or javascript -- good for that since it lets us selectively turn off annoying/unsafe js options.

      But even with *everything* turned off, Mozilla is a slug compared to NS3.04 (even on my P3 with gobs of RAM). Tho what really annoys me is that Mozilla emulates IE in how it works overall -- it does NOT emulate Netscape. Most notably context menu behaviour.. NS lets you click-drag-release. Moz and IE make you click-move mouse-click again. Glah!!

      Also, I've found I vastly prefer NS3's font handling. WAY too many sites resolve to *tiny* fonts in newer browsers, quite hard on older eyes -- and adjusting fonts for one site screws 'em for the next site. NS3 displays most of these as 12point -- much easier for us old folks to read. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:Reminisce by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      Well, I use 1.3 and while not a speed demon its pretty fast, except at load time. I keep it running all the time so it doesn't matter.

      Funny, I use mozilla when I don't want Flash, etc. I use IE on the rare occasion I want it. Because it was already installed with Flash.

      The current right click behavior is the standard windows behavior. What you describe is the X windows,(maybe mac too) standard. I would bet there is a preference to change it, but I don't know it off-hand.

      The preference I do know about is in the advanced section\mouse wheel. Go in there and set Ctrl+Mouse Wheel to change font size. Works Great.

      Every site I encounter with microfonts gets Ctrl+Mouse Wheel zoomed up to 20 points!!

      Many times I zap the background color with a bookmarklet also. I hate all these bright white pages, that have become the norm.

      Anyway, good luck.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    18. Re:Reminisce by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The only IE I'd let out of its cage, and then only closely supervised, is 5.0 (a build handed out at a seminar that seems better-behaved than most). And ... well, put it this way, if IE was the only browser available, I'd give up everyday use of the web. It annoys me that much! And Moz is way more like IE than it is any version of NS. So it too gets put away as soon as the rare need for it is over!

      Don't care for mouse wheels myself. Am always moving the wrong thing!

      NS mouse behaviour isn't standard Windows behaviour, nope. The standard behaviour is fine for most things, but when you're doing a lot of fast task adding/jumping, like experienced browser users tend to do, it's painfully slow and annoying (and personally I don't know how anyone stands it in a browser). AFAIK there's no option to change Moz's to NS's model, and I got flamed when I asked for it in one of the newsgroups.

      I don't think Moz's devteam have ever *been* NS users, judging by both feature set and behaviour. ISTM they're dead bent on reproducing IE, with Moz's only real advantage being greater configurability.

      And I had such hopes that Moz would extend NS's lifespan .. ah, well. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  6. I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? by confused+philosopher · · Score: 5, Funny


    Excuse me, I have to go outside and stretch my legs. A bathroom break would be a nice change of pace too.

    --
    Why slashdot? Why not?
    1. Re:I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? by Schnapple · · Score: 1
      NO!!!!

      Don't you know that toilets are death traps after too long in front of the screen?

    2. Re:I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? by confused+philosopher · · Score: 1

      Thank you kind sir for the warning.

      I will simply continue to use my "dependable" method.

      I will also forego the shower, because I don't want water on my skin when operating a keyboard.
      I stink, therefore I am.

      If I had known 10 years ago that my ISP was the equivalent of a crack dealer, then I might have chosen a different path in my life. Alas, that is not to be.

      --
      Why slashdot? Why not?
    3. Re:I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? Excuse me, I have to go outside and stretch my legs. A bathroom break would be a nice change of pace too. "

      What's it like serving aboard the Enterprise?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? by greenhide · · Score: 1

      Wow! That must have been some game he was playing.

      I wonder what game it was. I want to play that game!

      Oh, wait, it was probably this.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    5. Re:I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? by KilerCris · · Score: 1

      outside?? where's that? link please...

    6. Re:I've been doing this for 10 years!!!? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Not too bad, tho a little dull. But I'm sure it's going to pick up soon -- I just got issued a red shirt. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  7. Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ten years of quality pr0n! Go internet! May you bring us a 1000 years more!

    1. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and give us more like this girl! FUCKIN HOT!

  8. I celebrated a while ago by Neophytus · · Score: 1

    Well, sort of. I installed Netscape 2 for the fun of it and to relive my first intenet memories and swiftly uninstalled it as it was well... hopeless. I swiftly discovered my url.dll had been deleted and I had some real good 'fun' finding it again. Thanks Netscape :/

    1. Re:I celebrated a while ago by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      I was trying this open source Basilisk II Mac emulator (it does an incredible job btw, try it out if you wanna play some old Mac games like Bolo!) and needed to install a web browser. So I downloaded Netscape Navigator 2 and gave it a whirl. The funny thing was it would choke on Netscape's current default homepage - too much crap on it. I guess they don't regression test. hehe. Of course, it handled Google.com came to the rescue.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    2. Re:I celebrated a while ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      netscape 3 GOLD was my first browser!
      so screw u
      biotch

  9. Huh? by delta407 · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    Slashdot marked the anniversary a little while ago.
    So why post it again?!?

    Is Slashdot trying to get an obscene number of duplicates today?
  10. Deliberate Dupe by MoZ-RedShirt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot marked the anniversary a little while ago.

    Great. They know they are posting dupes and they even brag about it ;-)

    RedShirt

    --
    Microsft spel chekar vor sail, worgs grate !!!
    1. Re:Deliberate Dupe by Nidhogg · · Score: 1

      Not only that but look at the topic icon(s) at the top of the page.

      Somehow they've managed to stack both the Mozilla and The Internet icons.

      Is this the new standard for "We know it's a dupe" or is it just me?

  11. Make Mosaic Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be the best way to celebrate the centenary of this legendary USENET reader!

    Congratulations to all the folks at Novell!

    Cheers,
    Paco

    1. Re:Make Mosaic Open Source! by wheany · · Score: 1

      This is a reply. That's what you wanted, isn't it?

    2. Re:Make Mosaic Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it was. Thank you for adding meaning to my life.

      Can you try being a bit more entertaining next time?

      Cheerio,
      Paco

    3. Re:Make Mosaic Open Source! by wheany · · Score: 0, Troll

      Can you try being a bit more entertaining next time?

      Sorry, how's this:

      How syupid can you be, teh mosaic is no the frist usenet reader, it si the first WWW browsre! AND it was not made by noevll!!!!!!!!111

    4. Re:Make Mosaic Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent poster is childish, but you are such a dork.

      I always wondered my most Finnish people are such idiots. I almost got in a fight with one at pub last month, but maybe it's not because I wanted to take my disgust of everything Finnish out on him, perhaps I just have some anger issues. I wish that brawl had happened.

    5. Re:Make Mosaic Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How syupid can you be, teh mosaic is no the frist usenet reader, it si the first WWW browsre! AND it was not made by noevll!!!!!!!!111

      Cool, and you even brought it down to my intellectual level (Jeff K is my idol). Nice touch.

      Have a nice day,
      Paco

    6. Re:Make Mosaic Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey bozo, your father wears your mother's army boots!

      Paco

    7. Re:Make Mosaic Open Source! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

  12. Uhh... by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...but mosaic wasn't the first web browser, just the first that most people used. Tim Berners-Lee wrote a graphical browser for NeXT -- his preferred platform at the time and the GUI platform he was most familiar with. For the Unixes there were only lame command-line/text-mode browsers at the time, but even those count as browsers that predate Mosaic.

    1. Re:Uhh... by torpor · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, for the Unixes there was NCSA Mosaic. Well, if you had Sun hardware, that is.

      I remember the day I first got a web browser working properly on my old Sparc box (moon.earthlink.net, incidentally EarthLinks' first DNS server...) I thought to myself: This is going to be huge if it ever gets to PC's.

      A few weeks later, someone got NCSA Mosaic working under Windows (forget who it was), and the rest is history...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Uhh... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      heh..mosaic was probably the only csc project that the students thought was kick ass cool and developed for windows.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:Uhh... by drgroove · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tim's web browser was called "WorldWideWeb" ...
      W3.org

    4. Re:Uhh... by demonlapin · · Score: 1
      Well, it was a year later...

      but I distinctly recall running Mosaic on Ultrix (and those were some slooooow boxes, little more than glorified Xterms).

    5. Re:Uhh... by sirinek · · Score: 1

      Yeah but this was also way back when you had to buy a separate TCP/IP stack for your Dos/Windoze machine. Anyone outside of a university who had any internet access in 1993 (with maybe a scant couple exceptions) was doing it by dialing into a shell account.

    6. Re:Uhh... by pfankus · · Score: 1

      and in the first line of the article, it states that our beloved Mosaic definitely isn't the first:

      Little did they know that their pet project, a humble application named Mosaic, would fundamentally change everyday life. While Web browsers with graphical interfaces had traded hands among academics years earlier, Mosaic was the first to be widely adopted and introduce the masses to the Internet.

      How reading becomes difficult when you want to post so quickly...

    7. Re:Uhh... by #!/bin/allen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The systems programmers with Unix workstations didn't have Windows and Word, so we used xmosaic as a page layout system. At that time, we were also able to delete most Word and all Excel file sent via email. If we did need to read a Word file, we used the Unix Word viewer, "strings".

      Before we were directly connected to the DDN, one of the guys wrote a telnet tunneler to get through the gatehost. That was a great day. We didn't care what we looked at. It was soooo cool.

      --
      sed 's/commun/terror/g' mccarthy > bush; sed 's/terror/saddam/g' bush > bush_wacked
    8. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless of what the article says, the slashdot headline gives no indication of that and misleads people into thinking the Mosaic was THE FIRST web browser which is pretty much akin to saying the Model T is the first car -- it definitely wasn't the first, but it was the one that became most widespread and for a lot of people it was the first time they saw one.

    9. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just RFTA.

    10. Re:Uhh... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well I rember rusing NSCA Mosaic in 1994 for Linux. It was great I could view the Web With Pictures. And using dip was much easier to setup and run then using WinSock. But at the time what I relly liked on the web was FTP and Telnet. It was great I could Telnet to a BBS and use FTP to download the files all at the same time, Heck I could download multible files and telnet to multible BBSs at the same time all on 1 14.4k modem. Man that was just so cool! And with Linux kernel 1.2(i think) I hade multi-tasking so when the downloads was to slow I would switch to a console and play tetris or sasteroids. Ahh those were the day. Everyone else at the time was praying that Windows 3.1 or Deskview wont crash if they even though of multitasking. And when you were multitasking everything went slow. Linux seemed like the uber OS at the time. Now Linux and the Web just seems So So and good enough. The magic is gone.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    11. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      *sigh* Seeing those screenshots makes me want to place a bid for a copy of OPENSTEP on eBay...

    12. Re:Uhh... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      twitter is right - install WindowMaker and you can get really close...

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    13. Re:Uhh... by green+pizza · · Score: 1

      No, for the Unixes there was NCSA Mosaic. Well, if you had Sun hardware, that is.

      My first experience with Mosaic was on an SGI Indigo workstation... NCSA had binaries available for SGI's IRIX OS early on.

      A few weeks later, someone got NCSA Mosaic working under Windows (forget who it was), and the rest is history...

      I don't recall who did the initial Windows port, but NCSA had binaries for Windows 3.1 and MacOS 7 within a few months of the initial Unix releases.

    14. Re:Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you and I know perfectly well that maybe only 5% of slashdotters on a good day follow the links and that maybe 2% of those that follow the links don't close the window if there are no pictures.

  13. We should celebrate by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    We should celebrate this taking the original source code from Mosaic and updating it to include these new useful features:

    Pop up ads
    ActiveX controls that can have full access to your computer
    An e-mail client with HTML support so you can view spam as it was intended

    and so on. Go progress!

    1. Re: We should celebrate by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > ActiveX controls that can have full access to your computer

      > An e-mail client with HTML support so you can view spam as it was intended

      And a virtual machine running Windows XP, so you can fully enjoy all the viruses you're getting bombarded with.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:We should celebrate by jesser · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft beat you to it. From IE 6's about box:

      "Based on NCSA Mosaic. NCSA Mosaic(TM); was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign."

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    3. Re:We should celebrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pop up ads
      ActiveX controls that can have full access to your computer


      Gosh, my web browser doesn't even support these, I'd better upgrade!

    4. Re:We should celebrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. Yeah. I think he knew that already. Hence the jab.
      But thank you for that wonderful piece of insight.

  14. Lucky by mrphish697 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Computer Science seems to be the only profession in which we still have access to the people that helped start it. I've always enjoyed that. Take Whitfield Diffie, for example.

    --
    You can't ride two horses with one ass
    1. Re:Lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be pretty hard to talk to the people that started most other things. The first biologists? Dead. First chemists? Dead. First historians? Dead.

  15. timeline by ih8apple · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a history provided by w3. (Note: mozilla alpha released in February 1993. Already 50 HTTP servers in existence.)

    Here's a really cool seminar given at CERN in Feb 1993 on the potential of the web browser.

    1. Re:timeline by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      (Note: mozilla alpha released in February 1993. Already 50 HTTP servers in existence.)


      Ten years, and mozilla's only up to 1.something?
      Is there only one monkey at the typewriter or what?

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  16. Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IMHO, in 10 years we've progressed in the negative direction in regards to online applications thanks to Mosiac/http/html. 10 years later we're stuck with ecommerce pages that get hopelessly confused if you press the back button. Annoying website timeouts. Complex logic on the backend to handle stateless connections. Ugly front end development models. Half/assed Java Applets/Javascript attempts to actually create decent applications.

    Now as a presentation model, the web is great. But as an application infrastructure, we've gone nowhere if not backwards.

    1. Re:Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by rgmoore · · Score: 4, Interesting
      But as an application infrastructure, we've gone nowhere if not backwards.

      No, we haven't, because there really wasn't any infrastructure for on-line applications before the web. Sure there were a handful of standard protocols like ftp and telnet, plus the ability to have remote X sessions, but there wasn't really anything beyond that. At least today it's possible to have an on-line application that has some prayer of working. The web is piss poor compared to what you could do with a really well designed on-line applications protocol, but it's a fair sight better than having to roll your own system any time you want to accomplish anything.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    2. Re:Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by WetCat · · Score: 1

      No, you are wrong.
      There were various MUSE thingies,
      (www.maricopa.edu), telnet on-line BBS,
      WAIS.
      they were much more intellectual than WWW.

    3. Re:Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by archen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wouldn't say it's the fault of Mozaic/http/html. It's the lowest common denominator. In fact i'd say we've advanced due to the fact that browsers can handle more on the client side than they ever have. Stateless connections are not something that should be used for web apps, but it works (in a half asses way). That doesn't mean you should blame a pliers because it does a crap job of hammering in a nail.

    4. Re:Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by jlusk4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not sure where you're going with this.

      Client-server was most definitely a going concern before Mosaic, as was Sun's RPC and XDR protocols (if I may use such a grandiose word for such simple concepts).

      Even today, decent client-server apps are pretty much forced to have their own "custom" state machines/diagrams because otherwise, we'd all be running the same app (and it would be, uh... a web browser!).

      (What I mean, specifically, is that a hospital utilization management system would have a very different workflow from a textile mill spare-parts system, for instance, and that workflow/peer dialog state machine would be embodied in the application itself.)

      A co-worker tells me that maybe you're referring to the ease w/which apps could be developed post-Mosaic vs. pre-Mosaic, since tools like Visual Dev Studio ++ Wizzy Wizard# were just a gleam in somebody's eye at the time, and anyway, were absolutely not oriented to distributed processing.

      If we haven't taken a giant step backwards in developing distributed apps, we've certainly experienced some arrested development.

      John.

    5. Re:Advent of html/http worse thing for online apps by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Sure there were a handful of standard protocols like ftp and telnet, plus the ability to have remote X sessions, but there wasn't really anything beyond that.

      That was the infrastructure: you have sockets; pick an unused TCP port; design a protocol well-suited to your problem domain; write a client and a server; let a thousand flowers bloom. Now it's all web-based, which means that the client really lives on the same host as the server, and the web browser (the supposed client side) is just a presentation manager.

      Rolling your own protocol really isn't that bad--after all, look at the protocols we have. They somehow seemed to take off.

      Imagine if HTTP had pre-dated email. We'd all be stuck reading email in Mozilla or IE, there'd be no way to send mail to users of other mail systems and there'd be no such thing as gnus, Mailsmith, mutt &c. No thanks.

  17. Mosaic in the context of the time by JoeBuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had actually used the CERN line-mode www interface before Mosaic came out, just to check out the ravings of this pompous Brit I heard about (by the name of Tim Berners-Lee) who was raving that this thing called the World Wide Web was intended to contain the sum of all human knowlege. But Mosaic was a huge leap forward.

    However, when Mosaic first came out, a lot of folks in my department were using it as a better interface to Gopher, since in 1993 there was far more interesting stuff available via Gopher than via HTTP. Of course that didn't last long.

    1. Re:Mosaic in the context of the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Mac OS X still includes www, so you can relive those experiences. Although if you want a real kick, try 'www http://www.apple.com'.

    2. Re:Mosaic in the context of the time by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      What's funny is we have a sub-section of the WWW at Everything2 that seems to be heading in the direction of containing the sum of all human knowledge.

      Or at least a summary of it.

      Biggest problem is that people would rather write about themselves than node anything factual.

      Did anyone think that the WWW would become so entertainment oriented?

      My first website was a breath of fire 2 info-tastic spectacular (in fugly blue and black colours) so it was kinda both :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    3. Re:Mosaic in the context of the time by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1
      But Mosaic was a huge leap forward.

      My memory of Mosaic is that it crashed a lot. Mind you, I was using a beta version for the Mac in September 1993. By the time I got a second chance to use the web, Netscape had taken over. It also crashed a lot, but still not as much as that first version of Mosaic.

  18. I remember reading about it in Infoweek... by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I can remember reading an article about Mosiac in Infoweek around then. The article gushed over it. Saying how the combination of text and pictures would revolutionize the Internet.

    I still remember thinking what's the big deal. Revolution, Shemzolution. This thing will never take off.

  19. Isn't lynx older? by leandrod · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Shouldn't that be 10 years of *GUI* web browsing? Isn't lynx, and the whole web stuff a little bit older?

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    1. Re:Isn't lynx older? by Troed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No. Mod parent down. Not interesting.

    2. Re:Isn't lynx older? by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 2, Informative

      No.

      Lynx is not 'older'

      But Gopher did predate the WWW, and provided a text-centric view into the vast emptyness that was the internet.

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    3. Re:Isn't lynx older? by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. Yet another guy thinking something is newer and better because it bloats more graphics by default.

      Moderators have to be on crack. Everybody knows Mosaic was the first HTTP-HTML browser.

      Wouldn't slashdot be great if people didn't pull things off their ass so often?? Oh well

    4. Re:Isn't lynx older? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > Everybody knows Mosaic was the first HTTP-HTML browser.

      Then everybody is wrong.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    5. Re:Isn't lynx older? by leandrod · · Score: 1

      Answering my own question, lynx isn't older than Mosaic, but there were other programs, both GUI and text mode, before Mosaic. Looks like the Web is actually 13 years old.

      In fact, I was around in 1,994, and remember that Mosaic was greeted as the first easy-to-use browser, succeeding less user-friendly antecessors.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    6. Re:Isn't lynx older? by montulli · · Score: 1

      Lynx is older by more than a year. Originally Lynx did not use HTML over HTTP, it used the hyperez markup language over gopher. It was functionally the same, but it wasn't technically a web browser. It did do things that the web didn't do at the time, such as forms.

    7. Re:Isn't lynx older? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which was another thing anyway

    8. Re:Isn't lynx older? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to tell you, but lynx worked over gopher then.
      Mosaic was the first HTTP-HTML browser.

      Similar functionality but a different thing: it worked over gopher.

    9. Re:Isn't lynx older? by welshsocialist · · Score: 1
      According to the Lynx homepage:

      Lynx is a product of the Distributed Computing Group within Academic Computing Services of The University of Kansas. Lynx was originally developed by Lou Montulli, Michael Grobe, and Charles Rezac. Garrett Blythe created DosLynx and later joined the Lynx effort as well. Currently it is being maintained by members of the Internet community. Thanks to Tim Berners-Lee and the other CERN World Wide Web wizards for the WWW client library code and all of their other work on the WWW project. Thanks to NCSA and the Mosaic developers, and to everyone out in netland who has contributed to Lynx's development either directly (through comments or bug reports) or indirectly (through inspiration and development of other systems). Also a special thanks to Foteos Macrides who ported much of Lynx to VMS, and to Earl Fogel of the University of Saskatchewan. Earl developed a UN*X/VMS version of Peter Scott's HYTELNET using the hypertext engine HYPERREZ. HYPERREZ was developed by Neil Larson of MaxThink and served as the infrastructure for the early versions of Lynx which did not use the WWW libraries and had their own hypertext format.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
  20. Ironic by deanj · · Score: 1

    The celebration NCSA is having doesn't even have one person speaking that had anything to do with Mosaic. Nearly everyone that had anything to do with it's long gone, and the department that created it (and NCSA telnet) was axed years ago.

    1. Re:Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the website:
      The 1,750-seat Foellinger Auditorium is the site of classes, lectures, symposia, concerts and other performances, and special events.

      They make it sound so nice; however, I see it for what it really is, the place where I have to goto at 8am to watch a boring econ lecture.

    2. Re:Ironic by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      I think one of the more remarkable things about the WWW was that it came out of CERN and NCSA.

      Those institutions were publicly funded to do work on physics and generic supercomputing.

      Note that WWW and Mosaic were only peripherally related to the core missions of CERN and NCSA.

      In a privately funded enterprise, these projects might well have been killed off because they would have been deemed too peripheral, not manifestly contributing to next quarter's EPS.

      So these great inventions, WWW and the browser, did not emerge from private enterprise.

      Think about that the next time you provide guidance to your congressperson about how much to spend on what.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  21. Our Pleasure! by LordYUK · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear Neophytus,

    On behalf of the Netscape Development Team, I just want to say, you're welcome!

    Happy Hunting!

    The Netscape Development Team.

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  22. Mosaic by skywire · · Score: 1

    I remember the moment when I loaded a web page in an alpha release of Mosaic like people remember where they were when they heard about the JFK assassination or 9/11. I announced to the room full of internet users that "This is going to change the world". One of my coworkers said "Big deal. So they threw together an app that can download html files and some helper apps to display bitmaps and play sounds. We could have done that." I replied, "Maybe so, but mark my words: this is going to change the world." Looks like I was right about something for once.

    --
    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    1. Re:Mosaic by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

      About 10 years earlier I saw an ZX-81 "painting" Lissajous figures and I said: "I want to work with computers the rest of my life!".

      I had never heard of Oscar Wilde: ""When the gods wish to punish us they answer our prayers" or Aesop :"We would often be sorry if our wishes were granted."

      But now I often wonder :"Why didn't I become a carpenter instead?".

      Now I am a systems/net/web/help administrator for people who dont grok computers. How sad is this?

      --
      ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
  23. Back in my day... by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 1

    It's hard to remember doing any kind of research before the internet... of course, that's probably because in 1993 I was in 7th grade, when going to the school library and opening a book was considered a huge deal. I had to stay after school as punishment for writing a computer drawing program -- the teachers thought I broke the machine!

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Back in my day... by operagost · · Score: 1

      Nice to see that things haven't changed... kids are still being given detention for "hacking" PCs.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:Back in my day... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well I was in 8th grade then. But you only got in trouble if you ran a virus scanning software on your disks to be sure that you are not getting a virus from the school computer or you are not giving them a virus. Usually they are OK with programming because it looked like you were using a word processor most of the time. (just as long as you dont do a bunch of junk charactors or make your pogram cool with graphics or Color ANSI).

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  24. End of the net? by neurostar · · Score: 3, Funny

    I recall getting on yahoo, surfing all the interesting links in one night, getting bored and going back to usenet news.

    So... what you're saying is you reached the end of the internet?

    1. Re:End of the net? by Alarion · · Score: 1

      YOU ARE THA WINNA!!!

      It would be a crying shame to reach the end of the web. Poor confused newbies, with no more blue underlined links to click on.

    2. Re:End of the net? by jesser · · Score: 1

      Which end of the internet? There are a lot of them.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
  25. You're in good company by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    I still remember thinking what's the big deal. Revolution, Shemzolution. This thing will never take off.

    Don't feel bad. Bill Gates said the same thing and according to Peter Jennings (and any other talking head that gets a chance to interview him), Gates is one of the smartest men in the world. I mean, he's got all that money, right? Surely he deserves it all for his visionary thinking. If a super-genius could make a mistake, then you shouldn't be so hard on yourself for making the same mistake.

    I remember hearing one interviewer on a radio talk show ask Gates: "Mr Gates, everyone is wondering: how did you write the Internet?" and good ol' Billy didn't bother to correct the man but gave some vague answer about how the Internet would make information available to everyone (provided they purchase a valid copy of Windows, of course).

    GMD

    1. Re:You're in good company by Speare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gates has always said that (paraphrased) Microsoft makes mistakes all the time, and that just one particularly bad misstep could doom Microsoft's prospects. The key to survival is to outlive the mistakes, to make fewer mistakes than the competition, and to keep tons of money in the bank instead paying them out in dividends, but these things can't always be done. This is why his company has tried to lowbal investor expectations every quarter, and exceed those expectations every quarter.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:You're in good company by theLOUDroom · · Score: 0

      Gates has always said that (paraphrased) Microsoft makes mistakes all the time, and that just one particularly bad misstep could doom Microsoft's prospects. The key to survival is to outlive the mistakes, to make fewer mistakes than the competition, and to keep tons of money in the bank instead paying them out in dividends, but these things can't always be done. This is why his company has tried to lowbal investor expectations every quarter, and exceed those expectations every quarter.

      No, acutally it's tax evasion. Lots of companies do this. They hold onto money instead of paying it out so their stockholders don't have to pay taxes on the dividends. Then the stockholders still get the money via an increase in the stock price. That why they finally have to pay a dividend. So they pay tax on all that cash they made. (Yes i know you could argue that it's double taxed, but that doesn't excuse the fact that they're trying to evade one of those taxes)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  26. MOD PARENT DOWN - Overly Sarcastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cynical posts like this don't provide any constructive criticism, so it's better if they're hidden from public view.

  27. I really miss gopher... by WetCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    and I really miss Internet Policy, which have had banned commercial stuff from the Internet.

  28. I was pissed when Mosaic came out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can remember thinking, "oh great, now everyone will be able to just get online and hit my favorite servers without needing to know squat. Within days it became necessary to go to my favorite servers in the middle of the night instead of at any time of the day. All I could see was congestion. Soon thereafter I saw my first web page with advertisements and I decided right then and there I would NEVER allow myself to bother viewing web sites with ads in them. hah.

  29. Nostalgia by (trb001) · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to remember the order of the web pages I saw come up back in 1993...

    1) Sun
    2) HP
    3) MS? IBM?
    4-1000) Porn

    Great invention, the web...

    --trb

  30. Another Timeline by tiltowait · · Score: 4, Informative

    here. And yes, starting with Sputnik really does make sense, that little tin ball spurned more scientific research (and translation Russian services) that some people realize.

    1. Re:Another Timeline by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      I think the word you were looking for was "spurred", although I found "spurned" particularly humorous for some reason.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  31. I remember by WetCat · · Score: 1

    the World Wide Web Worm (www.wwwww.(com?org?))

    1. Re:I remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could that be the *Internet* Worm (or the Morris Worm) you're refering to?

    2. Re:I remember by WetCat · · Score: 1

      no. that was one of the first search engines for the web.

  32. Old crochity man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you hear an old crotchety voice...

    I remember back when windows 3.1 DOS v1.31...

    Yep that was back in the days when I could still get layed...

    Now all you young whippersnappers...

    It was 16 colors of pure madness!!!

  33. Whoa.. 10 years! by matttastic · · Score: 2, Funny

    10 years ago i was playing in my backgarden eating mud. And the interweb was happening without me! :(

    1. Re:Whoa.. 10 years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and now you're on teh interweb slinging mud! "the more things change..." ;)

    2. Re:Whoa.. 10 years! by matttastic · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of adding something like that. But, obviously, I didn't ^^

    3. Re:Whoa.. 10 years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, Captain Obvious!

  34. and 9.9 years of online porn.... by MeanE · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I mean...what else would you use the web for?

  35. Re:News.com.com.com.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you serious? It's a joke--News.com comes up in a web browser as news.com.com. The joke is that they are adding more com's. Slashdot has one TLD--like normal sites.

    (Yes, I know it's because CNET's URL is com.com)

  36. Browser competition by iamacat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, Apple users still have it, IE vs Safari vs Camino. And as a result, browsers are fast, have popup blockers, download managers and tabbed browsing and about anything users ask for. Anyone who thinks they might sell stuff to Mac users designs their website properly. Just think about how much more lean and stable windows browsers would be if MS didn't kill off serious competition. Typing this in Safari.

    1. Re:Browser competition by listen · · Score: 1

      Interesting that in the mac browser market, two of the main players feature open source technology, and the other one is Microsoft. I wonder how long it will be before this trend spreads to other areas - eg office suites ( Open Office, Gobe Productive? Is that GPLed yet or just vapor? Or maybe some KOffice port in a couple of years. ) Maybe low-end database systems too...

      Not dissing iCab / Opera /etc...

  37. ...Or if they would have known by Andy+Tanenbaum · · Score: 1

    what a bloated piece of crap Mosaic would sadly become, they might have abandoned the project as well. Microsoft stole Mosaic.

    1. Re:...Or if they would have known by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      And exactly how is that stealing?

      Spyglass bought the exclusive commercial license for Mosaic from NCSA. Money and other goods were paid to NCSA for the rights.

      Microsoft purchased a non-exclusive license from Spyglass for the technology. Again, money and other goods were exchanged.

      So... uh... where is the alleged thievery?

    2. Re:...Or if they would have known by BJH · · Score: 1

      Microsoft paid very little to license Spyglass Mosaic, on the understanding that a certain percentage of income from Explorer would be paid to Spyglass as royalties.

      Then Microsoft released Explorer as a free download...

    3. Re:...Or if they would have known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes? Still no stealing apparent. What is your point exactly?

    4. Re:...Or if they would have known by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Ah... so they stole it because Spyglass entered into a stupid contract.

      Sorry, doesn't wash. Spyglass was foolish and greedy. They should've demanded a flat rate based on units shipped (which would include downloaded). Especially since they knew MS was planning to build it into the OS. Hell, at even $.005/copy that's how many millions of dollars?

  38. This is not worth a whole story by njdj · · Score: 0, Troll

    This wasn't the first web browser. It wasn't the first use of html or http. Those are the significant milestones, not Mosaic.

    So why did the Slashdot editors pick this story, while (presumably) rejecting dozens of worthwhile ones? Oh - I get it - it's a repeat .....

  39. Re:Reminisce - What you missed by thrillbert · · Score: 1

    You seem to be missing THE #1 attraction on the Ineternet in those days.. IRC.. who needs instant messaging if everyone you care to know is already in your channel?!?

    Of course, ten years ago my IRC lag started increasing drastically.. I wonder why...

    ---
    Schizophrenia beats being alone.

  40. The speed of information by GOD_ALMIGHTY · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This makes me amazed at the speed with which information now travels. I remember trying to get on the net in high school back in 94. Nobody I knew, knew anything about it and there were no easy to install IP stacks for Win 3.1. I remember trying to decipher the articles in Boardwatch magazine and hunting the local BBS's for info.

    It took me forever to finally get on (a Prodigy account) and then that was text. I used that to get info for my first Linux install and finally after switching to Netcom and getting X working, I was surfing the web with Netscape. What a pain.

    I had no idea how to do this stuff and finding the info was extremely painful. It was like a bunch of secrets that took forever to find. The only person I talked to at the time that knew about Mosaic or anything was some random clerk in an OfficeDepot.

    Today, we know the instant anything is released, we get the inner workings of expert groups. I know I take all this stuff for granted today, but it is still completely amazing how things have changed.

    --
    Arrogance is Confidence which lacks integrity. -- me
    1. Re:The speed of information by arvindn · · Score: 1
      Today, we know the instant anything is released, we get the inner workings of expert groups.

      You mean like ICANN?

    2. Re:The speed of information by Cranx · · Score: 1

      I was there, brother. I was on Netcom too. That was back when they only had shell accounts; they weren't issuing out regular TCP/IP accounts. To get winsock to work, I bought a shareware program called TIA which ran on the shell account and fed TCP/IP packets over a simple telnet connection back to trumpet winsock running on Windows 3.x. That was to get Mosaic working, and man, there was nothing there but a whole lot of gray text-only sites. Most web sites were just conversions of gopher document hierarchies anyway. There was NO searching...just university directories that you could navigate around. I got pretty far, too...navigated to sites in Germany, Korea, lots of overseas places. That was hard to do though...you really had to try EVERY link you came across. What a blast that was though...wow, was it really 10 years ago!?

    3. Re:The speed of information by Cyno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Me too.

      I was just thinking the other day where would we be without the net. Right now I have access to answers to almost any questions on google, which is always available when I'm at work or home or over at a friend's house. Everyone I know has an email address or IM or some account somewhere on the net.

      Soon I will use the net for all communications, including audio, video and text. It has become as essential to everyone's every day lives as the telephone or TV. Which is very similar to AOLTW's and most corporation's mission statement, replacing internet with the company name of your choice.

      But no matter how much has been changed because of the net we can never forget that those changes happened because of open communication, open protocols, free intellectual property, free access, and the hard work of many many extremely skilled engineers. I don't think the internet could be rebuilt today in the US under our current administration or their preference for security over freedom.

      The internet is based entirely on freedom and could not exist without everyone agreeing to maintain that freedom. The freedom to send a packet around the world for $0.00. The freedom to say what you want without fear of prosecution, etc. Those freedoms might not exist forever. And then what will become of the internet as we know it or as it could be used tomorrow?

      American Capitalist Perspective: The net was only useful for commercialism. But then all those dotcoms crashed. So does that mean the net is worthless?

      MPAA/RIAA Rep: No, the net is a tool for terrorists and pirates to steal your IP and must be monitorred, enforced and secured. It is a dangerous place.

      Tech: The net can be used for voting and education and automation and software development and music and video and games and... if we just got rid of money we have the technology to make it all work for us, instead of the other way around.. Hello.. anybody listening?

  41. The web is great and all, but... by Iscariot_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The web is great, but I think lately there's been a real focus on making the web do things it shouldn't. And by that, I mean web-based applications.

    There are certain things the web can do well application wise. Like an online calendar, or email application (yahoo/hotmail). However, things like office applications should not use web-based technologies. It's always slow and clunky. I mean, sure you can do drag-and-drop with dhtml, but it's inconsistant and slow. I'd much rather deal with a java applet, or ActiveX, so as to have a true GUI instead of a GUI-emulator.

    Am I totally off base here, or does anyone else agree?

    1. Re:The web is great and all, but... by Frostalicious · · Score: 1

      Am I totally off base here, or does anyone else agree?

      Sort of. I relate where the web is right now to where windows was in version 3.0. It can kind of do some basic stuff, but you wouldn't trust it for something serious.

      Now, after MS poured 100 billion into it to get to Win2K, it is capable of being a serious platform. I think the same thing will happen to the web, or a closely related internet technology.

      I suppose, however, that some would say Win2K can kind of do some basic stuff, but you wouldn't trust it for something serious :)

    2. Re:The web is great and all, but... by sahala · · Score: 2, Informative
      There are certain things the web can do well application wise. Like an online calendar, or email application (yahoo/hotmail). However, things like office applications should not use web-based technologies. It's always slow and clunky. I mean, sure you can do drag-and-drop with dhtml, but it's inconsistant and slow. I'd much rather deal with a java applet, or ActiveX, so as to have a true GUI instead of a GUI-emulator.

      Am I totally off base here, or does anyone else agree?

      Flash.

    3. Re:The web is great and all, but... by zmooc · · Score: 1
      Webapps are still the only kind of app that doesn't require any (additional) software to be installed at the client. The amount of sysadminwork and helpdeskwork this saves can be incredible. It' also the only kind of network-enabled app that works everywhere (i.e. even on networks that only allow http access and only through a proxy). And it's the only kind of application that's really platform independent. It's not always slow and clunky and drag-and-drop is not necessary. ActiveX and Java Applets are not platform-independent and therefore shouldn't even be mentioned.

      Disclaimer: I make a pretty good living building webapps:)

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    4. Re:The web is great and all, but... by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The biggest problem is that the closer and closer the web gets to the traditional client UI, the farther and farther it gets away from true platform independence. I could show you 500 implementation items using DHTML/Javascript that work in IE and not Netscape or Mozilla based browsers (not that a little extra work for the developers could hammer out a solution that would work on both.)

      This is a bigger problem in Intranets where the chosen browser is IE, and we do not even bother to test against anything else because of a install base of IE on 99.9% of our desktops....Or take the extra time to make it work on both.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    5. Re:The web is great and all, but... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Personally, I find web-alike UIs in non-web applications to be extremely irritating at best. Slow, clunky, and often limited in some weird way (usually by being an IE-alike).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  42. moron tenures of browsing won0won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is what you wanted? this must be some sort of pun(ishment)?

    once upon a time, there were to partIEs, now that they are won, the partIE's overbullown?

    that's gov.va.msn.?net?(as in fishes) (VAST) .controll??

    all icann say is: lookout bullow.

  43. Remembering the browser wars by ericsink · · Score: 2, Interesting
    With the 10th anniversary of Mosaic I decided to writeup some of my recollections from the days when I was a participant in the browser wars:

    http://software.ericsink.com/Browser_Wars.html

    --
    Eric Sink
    Software Craftsman
  44. Wow, 10 years.. by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    I had worked in a corporate office up until '92 where networking only consisted of NetBIOS over NetBEUI. Then, I went to work at NYU Computer Science in '93. Man, what a great place to be at that time. We had Sparcs as our office computers! I used xrn and loved killfiles :) I remember compiling Mosaic, and being blown away with what I saw.

    My first project was to put the technical reports collection online for the department. Most of them were in DVI format and needed to be converted to .ps. Others were so old, that I had to scan them in and store them as God knows what. I also took an Apple Quicktake 100 around campus and made a clickable map of the campus that brought up the photos of the campus area, including the fountain in Washington Square Park.

    Fun times, fun times.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  45. I'll see your news.com.com.com ... by Malfourmed · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and raise you news.com.com.com.com.

  46. Re:Lucky (yeah, sort of...) by gosand · · Score: 1
    Computer Science seems to be the only profession in which we still have access to the people that helped start it. I've always enjoyed that. Take Whitfield Diffie [sun.com], for example.

    When you see Charles Babbage or Alan Turing, tell them I said Hi. :-)

    I get your point though, we have more modern founders than any other profession that is so widely recognized. But there will always be someone long dead who paved the way for Computer Science. It all depends on who you consider truly "started" it. On the shoulders of giants you know. Also, Computer Science is a pretty broad term now, there are definite "specializations" and crossover professions within pure CS.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  47. If Mosaic was released 10 years ago... by greysky · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Then why is it that most of the web development job postings I've seen for the last couple of years say "minimum 10 years of HTML/DHTML programing experience required"?

    1. Re:If Mosaic was released 10 years ago... by rbolkey · · Score: 1

      Because the last developer they hired had 14 years of html/dhtml experience on their resume, and they thought 10 would be fair.

    2. Re:If Mosaic was released 10 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's binary. They're trying to catch you off guard and get the guys that realize that they really only mean 2 years.

    3. Re:If Mosaic was released 10 years ago... by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      Because they intend to hire an H1B, and have to conduct a pro forma search for an American, which will (surprise) yield no qualified candidates.

    4. Re:If Mosaic was released 10 years ago... by fermion · · Score: 1

      I find these thing hilarious. The suits have jobs definitions that have nothing to do with reality. They have no sense of programming methods, only languages. As such, when a supervisor comes in wanted a lead programmer, the suits think 5 years experience. This is why we saw so many ads in the late 90's for java developers with 5 years experience.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  48. I recall by mlush · · Score: 1

    my comment in my computer note book

    There are no answers only hyperlinks It would be pat to say '..and nothing has changed' but it has I would now write

    There are many answers, and even more popups

    1. Re:I recall by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

      There may be pop-ups, but I'm like Phoenix/Firebird/whatever they will call it next from the ashes ...

      The best way to fight fire is using fire.

      --
      ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
  49. On the eve of OS reinstall... by vladb · · Score: 1

    And I will celebrate this anniversary by making yet another flaming post, chastising Microsoft's direct involvement in squashing the independant browser movement. I'll compose my flaming post in preferably l33t speak to bemuse the online audience and deliver an oh'so strong punch up Bill Gate's nose. I'll type my flaming post in a mozilla browser... while still burning in rage, I'll find my Windows XP OS box with the Windows (R) logo on it and crush it into the ground with my bare feet.

    I wouldn't go as extreme as doing all this had I not had to reinstall my entire OS when my IE upgrade went wrong just a couple days prior to this special anniversary!!



    (note: your understanding of sarcasm is appreciated).

    1. Re:On the eve of OS reinstall... by carney1979 · · Score: 1

      Bet you'll be REALLY thrilled to learn IE is built on Mosaic. To bad M$ didn't keep it open source the way Mosaic was meant to be...

  50. in related news.. by verch · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..most of us had our last productive day on April 21st 1993. :)

  51. Collage - Mosaic had a companion by jdoeii · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember that ftp site with Mosaic back in 1993. There was another application there - Collage. The idea was pretty neat. It was a tool to *sensualize* scientific data. Not just visualize, but turn in into audio too. I wonder what happened to it. I am not sure if it later became Spyglass Transform. It could be that its development was discontinued. Does anyone know Collage fate?

    1. Re:Collage - Mosaic had a companion by deanj · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was ended shortly before Mosaic was cancelled.

  52. Re:News.com.com.com.com? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot also contains repetition.

    Say "slashdot.org" and it sounds like "slash dot dot org".

  53. I'm sick of anniversaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's next, the first time the word "Internet" was used in a sentence, following a comma?

    It's May 3rd, btw.

  54. Silly Campus Tech dept. by dreadpiratemark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was a Sophmore at American University in DC when Mosaic was announced. I remember going to the main computer center on campus and inquiring about this 'web browser' program and if they'd let me load it on a machine there, since the 386sx in my dorm wasn't going to cut it (or, failing that, if they'd load it themselves). Having been shuffled from person to person, I finally ended up with the lab manager who stated "Why would you want to do that? You can get everything you would want off of UseNet. We can't have students loading every flash-in-the-pan technology on these machines."

    Fine, he was rather right - there wasn't going to be much to do with Mosaic and I *did* get most things from usenet. But I would just love to go back and ask him today if he still considers web browsers a 'flash-in-the-pan'.

    -Mark

    1. Re:Silly Campus Tech dept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same problem too, although I didn't ask permission to install it. It took me three days and my Girlfriends account space linked to mine before I could compile it on a Project Vincent DEC machine. Too bad there were only a few sites to look at at the time though...

  55. OT ? konqueror 3.0.5a on openBSD by cashisking · · Score: 0

    The web page banner shows up; progress meter sticks at 99% ; BUT no story appears. http://www.iht.com/articles/93954.htm Some web pages take a certain amount of time to come up. Some never come up. And I am not talking about web sites that were slashdotted. KDE people are not telling me anything. If this is the future of the net, then I am in trouble. MOD ME DOWN please. Kiss my karma goodbye.

    1. Re:OT ? konqueror 3.0.5a on openBSD by cashisking · · Score: 0

      http://www.idg.net/ic_1309214_9677_1-5046.html http://www.idg.net/ic_1309380_9677_1-5048.html http://www.theregister.com/ http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/home/main100.shtml https://careerservices.enron.com https://careerservices.enron.com/EnronJobs/nonIE.a sp

    2. Re:OT ? konqueror 3.0.5a on openBSD by cashisking · · Score: 0

      http://www.thewb.com/Shows/Episode/0,8201,||1389,0 0.html Yes I like superman.

  56. I remember what got me on the Web, but not when by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 1

    I was reading Wired, and they had a big spread on Mosaic, including screenshots of the browser in action. When I saw it, I immediately installed Mosaic and hunted down every Web site I could. I wish I could remember what issue of Wired featured a multi-page layout of Mosaic screenshots and text. Does anyone else know? I'd guess it was from the 2.xx series, maybe 3.xx.

  57. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - shameless self-promotion by ericsink · · Score: 1

    Wow. I posted a link to an article on my personal weblog. That article does not mention my company name or any of the names of my company's products.

    Shameless self promotion? You've gotta be kidding.

    --
    Eric Sink
    Software Craftsman
  58. Gopher's cousin protocol: Beaver by Pyrosophy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Internet protocols that never made it:

    Like the GOPHER protocol, used in text-based information outlines, the BEAVER protocol was the first porn-only protocol available on the world-wide-web. BEAVER://hotladies.com certainly had great promise and wide usership in its early days, but the advent of MOSAIC and all things HTTP soon spelled the end of one of the more outrageous experiments in Internet history. Now it joins the long list of Archie, Veronica, and WAIS as the burned out Stuckey's stand on the information super-highway

    Notable features were the massive amount of stripped bits in beaver packets, thrust-technology (the precursor of push-technology), ActiveXXX support, and of course evil bit technology which was 10 years (!) ahead of its time.

    beaver://slashdot.com -- we never knew ya...

    1. Re:Gopher's cousin protocol: Beaver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and they could have saved a huge amount of bandwidth by now, by loading JPEGs from the bottom up (instead of top down). All the action is at the bottom of the picture, and you could decide much sooner if you wanted the pic or not, and abandon the download.

      Maybe I wasted too much of my life on this shit... :o)

  59. WorldWideWeb written in Obj-C on NeXT? by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see if that would compile under OS X, it supposedly supporting all the NeXT stuff.

    It would be neat to see what it would do with today's web pages. Anyone have source?

    1. Re:WorldWideWeb written in Obj-C on NeXT? by gunpowder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately the most important part of the source code is missing ...
      ... but here you go:
      WorldWideWeb homepage
      original WorldWideWeb docu
      WorldWideWeb source code

    2. Re:WorldWideWeb written in Obj-C on NeXT? by Shuh · · Score: 1

      Probably you can contact this guy...

      http://www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/WorldWideWeb. html

      There's a screenshot of the first WWW browser there for you to peruse...

  60. More Important Than Mosiac.... by EXTomar · · Score: 1

    ...is the fact that soon after the alpha release of Mosiac, CERN's directors stated that WWW technology to be freely usable by anyone. Being free is what bulid up Web technology more than any browser or server.

  61. Most antique system used for browsing the web? by GridPoint · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A while ago slashdot posted a story about an Internet-enabled operating system with a web browser for the Commodore 64. It was claimed that the 21 years old C64 was the oldest system ever to run a (real) web browser, and a few days later this was changed to the 23 years old Atari 800 (see the web browser's homepage for the full story). This means that the web is almost 10 years younger than the oldest system to surf it!

    1. Re:Most antique system used for browsing the web? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would still place my bet on some 1979 VAX... surely someone has tried to run early lightweight VMS browsers on early VAXes. They're after all real 32-bit machines and can do it without the heroic efforts you need on an 8-bitter.

  62. Mod parent down by WD · · Score: 3, Informative

    How is a question and an incorrect assumption moderated as "insightful" ?

    Mosaic could browse the web before Lynx could. The existing program Lynx was WWW-enabled after Mosaic was released. Just because it's text-only doesn't mean that it's older!!

  63. What now? by floppy+ears · · Score: 1

    So Mosaic is 10 years old today. I wonder whether in 10 years anyone will be looking back at today and saying, yeah, I remember such and such came out and I thought it was bullshit, but look at where we are now!

    If so, what is it?

    --

    "If I could live to be several hundred
    I could take a walk and really wander, really wonder."
    1. Re:What now? by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      Celebrity boxing on Fox.

    2. Re:What now? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Privacy and freedom.

  64. Browse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anybody even "browse" the web? I visit the exact same websites everyday, the browsing euphoria wore off with in the first few months that I had my first Internet connection back in '94 (AOL!). There are way too many websites on the Internet to browse through. If I need to find something I know how to find it (Google).

    1. Re:Browse? by mike_mgo · · Score: 1
      I still do, although it's not just random browsing. For example, just in the last couple of weeks I've starting reading a number of different journals on /. . Or sometimes if I'm finding a site in Yahoo or through Google I might end up checking out a few other sites that pop up even if they're not directly on target.

      I'd kind of compare it to book shopping. If I'm in the store I'll browse through the sections that interest me hoping to find something new, but I won't spend any time in areas I'm completely uninterested in.

  65. Not the first and Not the Best either by pjones · · Score: 3, Informative
    As I wrote in LocalTechWire. Mosaic was not the first and not the best browser.

    Web Turns 10 - But Was Mosaic Really First and Best Browser? No, No.
    By Paul Jones, Special To LTW
    Editor's note: April 22, 1993, is widely regarded as the day on which a number of people, including Marc Andreessen, who went on to help found Netscape, produced Mosaic - the ground-breaking Web browser. But was it really the first? To mark the 10th anniversary, Local Tech Wire asked one of the pioneers in Internet development - Paul Jones - to talk about the rise of the browser and how the technology transformed the Internet. Jones, who is director of ibiblio.org, a project that includes the Site Formerly Known as MetaLab and SunSITE, The Public's Library, has some very interesting observations.

    CHAPEL HILL - I don't mean to spoil the party, but the geek in me is forcing me to tell the cold unsociable truth - Mosaic, the browser that taught us the World Wide Web, is neither the first web browser nor is it the best. To make matters even more, well uncomfortable, I believe that Mosaic was a serious step in the wrong direction.

    The web seems wild and wide open now, but yes it was once designed to be more so. Believe it or not - the Web was designed for connectivity for all users, not just for publishers or information providers and it allowed the person browsing to create pages and links quickly and easily. The first web browser was about sociability and the interchange of ideas, not just delivery of linked pages.

    The real "Tucker" of Web browsers was the browser developed at CERN -where the web itself was developed - for the NeXT computer. The CERN
    Browser allowed not only web page browsing, but also WYSIWYG page creation and the ability to create links by simply highlighting text on a browsed page and linking that text to a page under construction by an easy click.

    The Hypermedia Browser also called Nexus and for a while called
    WorldWideWeb was written by none other than Tim Berners-Lee in 1990 and released in Christmas of that year. The focus of Tim's Browser was collaboration and mutual linking as reflected by the ease with which pages could be produced and links made between pages.

    I created my own first web page with only a few seconds instruction from Tim and a look at his demo age (a copy of which can be found at www.ibiblio.org/pjones/old.page.html ).

    For Tim's own description of the first Browser as well as screen shots of the browser in action see www.w3.org/People/Berners-Lee/WorldWideWeb.html

    More participation

    Notice that the Web in Tim's vision, as seen in his browser, was to be about active participation and creation of shared linked pages.

    Mosaic did have its moment of promoting collaboration. In Mosaic 1.2, the Group Annotations feature allowed readers of pages to add notes to those pages. This innovation was a precursor to the message boards, discussion groups and blogs of today. The nice thing about Group Annotations was the ease in which you could make notes for other group members. Even better Annotations in Mosaic supported both text and audio comments.

    Although Annotations would eventually collapse due to their
    over-popularity (and unscalable protocol design), the feature did manage to keep part of the dream of a sociable Web alive. But with the release of Mosaic 2.0 in September 1993, the folks at NCSA's System development Group decided to kill Group Annotations "initially" which turned out to be forever. (See
    target="_blank">archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/So ftware /Mosaic/Docs/group-annotations.html for NCSA's description of Annotations and their brief tale of their depreciation.)

    'A nice piece of work ...'

    The Mosaic that finally appeared in September 1993 was a nice piece of work. Mostly

    --
    Certified Black Helicopter Pilot *** Unwitting Dupe of One World Gov'ment
  66. Back when... by jhines0042 · · Score: 1

    ... I learned this new fangled HTML thingy in 1994 whilst at college and I, and my roomate, posted one of the most successful online games of the time, Connect Four.

    Thousands of games were played each day with people coming in from nasa.gov, ibm.com, and many other very interesting places. Even better the computer AI that I had written (a very basic 1.5 step look ahead AI) was capable of winning 50% or so of the games.

    Then I remember the day that AOL got a web browser. Shortly thereafter my Connect Four AI was winning 60% of the time.

    Of course, then the lawyers from Hasbro called and told me to shut it off since our board looked pretty close to the real thing and we were using the name. We offered them the source code but once they found out that were weren't making any money off of it they weren't interested.

    Oddly enough the url for the game was printed in a magazine for kids, complete with sticker of the URL, as well as a book of the "Best of the Web", kind of a Yellow Pages of URLs.... Seems really strange that people would print paper books indexing URLs. But of course I have a copy, for archival purposes.

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  67. evolution of a shell script by farnsworth · · Score: 4, Funny

    less ~/scripts/browser-is-hanging.sh

    #!/bin/bash

    # killall -9 mosaic-bin
    # killall -9 netscape-bin
    # killall -9 mozilla-bin
    # killall -9 phoenix-bin
    killall -9 thunderbird-bin

    --

    There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

    1. Re:evolution of a shell script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need a script to kill a hanged browser?

    2. Re:evolution of a shell script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as i know, he's killin a hanged mail-client :-)

      So if he would kill firebird-bin ... it will be another can of worms ;-)

    3. Re:evolution of a shell script by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      >So if he would kill firebird-bin ... ...and accidently kill his database! ;-)

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  68. Also the End of Netscape: coincidence by wolruf · · Score: 1

    It seems to coincide with the "end" of Netscape (perhaps the name, the company, the browser entity ?) as mentioned in some employee's blogs

    --
    wolruf@gmail.com
  69. Ali G Aiii by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    You mean like Boutros-boutros-boutros Ghali?

  70. Because by Gonoff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Such adverts are designed by people whose profession is wearing a suit.

    No - they are not HR droids, managers or agency clones. All of those may contain people who wear suits while they work. I am talking about people who wear suits as the major part of their jobs.

    Consider a conversation...

    What do you do?
    a. I'm an accountant. What about you?
    b. I'm a programmer. And you?
    c. I wear a suit.

    These are the people that are currently requiring 5 years experience with XP for Tier 2 support jobs....

    Come the revolution...... ;)

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  71. Say what?! by RADIV · · Score: 0

    lynx -dump www.slashdot.com|grep "Ten Years" -A 10|sed s#web#porn#gi

    --
    Suddenly the troll ate all the moderators and this posting lived a happy long life.

  72. The web will never replace Gopher by shoppa · · Score: 1

    I remember when a fellow grad student showed me Mosaic and pronounced it the next big thing. I knew better, of course, in that Gopher had far more real information available and would never be replaced by this www stuff.

  73. Great Milestones in Web Surfing by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

    April 22, 1994: The first successful requested web page is served.
    April 23, 1994: Irwin Spelnik attempts to read a Hello World page and receives the first 404 page not found.
    May 10, 1994: Charlie Northrup gives up on his dream to become a buddhist monk after a 4x4 spashes mud on him while he played a tamborine on a street corner, he decides to get even and files for web service patents.
    June 7, 1995: Wanda Furdman, attempting to entice her boyfriend, Jimmy Pimpleton, into proposing, places a nude picture of herself on a webserver and emails him the URL. Rather than keep this to himself, he joins the spam craze and sends to URL to everyone he can find an email address for. His plan flops as he hasn't figured a way to collect money for this, however he is widely credited with establishing the business model of the .com era to come.
    December 24, 1997: Melvin Gormly acts out an episode of Star Trek with figurines and his own voice, capturing it and converting it to an AVI file. He places it on his school web server and is promptly served the first Cease and Desist letter over web content and copyrighted material.
    April 1, 1998: CowboyNeal finally abandons his trusted TRS-80, buys a PC and joins the information age. The internet will never be the same.
    July 14, 1998: Wilbur Grimp, The CEO of Universal Business Associates, a fortune 100 company, suggests an discreet interlude with a detective posing as a 13 year old boy in an internet chat room. The pair are married on San Francisco 6 months later.
    November 7, 1998: Hershel Plotz ignores requests to pay for an item he has won on eBay and receives the first negative feedback. Two days later Hershel is bitten by a dog, hit by a car, falls into an open manhole and drowns. The first troll on Slashdot finds him guilty of being in league with Microsoft and deserving of his fate.
    November 11, 1998: The first troll on slashdot accuses a bitten, battered and drowned former Sun Java Developer and good friend of Scott McNeally, of being in league with Microsoft. Months later a stack of papers will be found in a brown paper bag in a Kent, WA bus depot locker connecting Hershel Plotz and William Gates III in a bogus jcode ring. The troll is vindicated, but the victory goes un-noticed in the torrent of me-too-trolls who followed.
    February 21, 1999: Freida Morganblat writes the first Internet Search Engine in VB.net Tragically, the first VB.net compiler and Microsofts CLR won't be created unil years later and she instead turns to a career as a stockbroker, makes millions and squirrels most of it away before the .com bust, but she will never be happy again, on her private island in the South Pacific.
    October 31, 1999: CNN's main page is hacked, the days top news is replaced with preposerous headlines and idiotic stories. No one notices for hours, then stock closes up 3 points.
    January 1, 1900: The first automobile plant opens in Vetchburg, ND. It closes three days later because of a horrific glitch in computer software.
    January 3, 2000: First webcast of manufactured Hollywood brain-softening music. Rupert Windelpoons digitizes it and captures it to an array of hard disks. Initially pleased with capturing music, Rupert realizes its all tripe and reformats the drives, narrowly avoiding a not-social call from Hilary Rosen and Jack Valenti.
    August 17, 2000: Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda shyly and quivering with nervous energy, attempts to email Lara Croft, asking for a date. After days of silence he decides it was never to be, he turns with tearful eyes to a girl named Kathleen for consolation and the rest, as they say, is history.
    March 24, 2001: A mothballed server is powered up and the sendmail daemon forwards a queued message from the french president to president@whitehouse.gov, what was meant as a personal jest between Francois Mitterand and Bill Clinton will eventually result in strained feelings between the US and France.
    September 12, 2001: Virgil Nordling abandons his plan for a bloo

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  74. Remember Trumpet TCP/IP? by ishmalius · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a while we were installing Trumpet on every machine in the office, except for the silly MacTCP installs. Actually, Trumpet seemed to work better than MS's own Winsock 1.0 implementation. The trace window was wonderful for protocol programming.

  75. My first look at the web in 1993 by jmping · · Score: 1

    Wow -- I remember the day my mother, a Professor, was pointed to Mosaic in 1993. I was looking at it with her, and predicted that the Web was doomed to failure because there was NOTHING there and no way to catalog anything. I told her it would die out to gopher b/c that was a so much better service at the time.

    Boy has history proven me wrong!

    --
    **When craziness is bliss, 'tis folly to be sane**
  76. anyone remember hytelnet? by esarjeant · · Score: 1

    There were many alternatives to http when it started, does anyone remember hytelnet?

    It was basically a frontend to telnet that would let you surf to multiple telnet sites using onscreen menus. Gopher improved on this slightly, but it really wasn't a quantum leap. Search was separate from surfing, WAIS was quite popular for documents and Archie made ftp viable.

    The Mosaic GUI really made things intuitive, I remember the first time I started it up on a Sparc -- I couldn't believe that I was getting a graphical view of things.

    --

    Eric Sarjeant
    eric[@]sarjeant.com

  77. Ten years of browsing? Try Twelve by spagiola · · Score: 1

    Before Mosaic there was Tim Berner-Lee's WWW browser, available for NeXT workstations.

    A few years ago I had the following exchange with Paul Kunz of Stanford University, in an effort to determine who could claim to have been the first in North America to have used the web. Bottom line: probably him, but I was probably second. Paul did a rather extensive search through the rather small but tightly-knit NeXT community, and found no earlier claims.

    > Well, I can claim to having HAD a browser earlier than you, though
    > I'm not sure about USING it. Here's the story: I got my NeXT slab in
    > March 1991. This was NeXT's entry-level 8/108 25MHz slab. Like many
    > other people, I soon found the 108MB HD to be very tight, given
    > NeXTSTEP's requirements. Later that spring, my father (Emilio
    > Pagiola of CERN, whom you know) visited me at Stanford, and he
    > brought me a 200MB HD. Since my father was also a NeXT user, he had
    > loaded the disk with a variety of available software for NeXTSTEP,
    > and since he was an early user of the web, this software included
    > Tim's browser. So I had a browser sometime in late spring 1991 -- I
    > can check my old datebooks for the exact dates, if you like.

    PK: Well seems you had a web brower on your machine at a time when the
    PK: Web wasn't made public outside of CERN yet.

    > Our offices were wired in the fall of 91, IIRC. At some point soon
    > thereafter, I did try out the www browser. There was very little if
    > anything to browse, of course. Basically CERN's seminar schedule
    > and the like. And so, since I needed the disk space, I deleted the
    > browser.

    PK: I demonstrated the web browser at SLAC before the end of
    PK: September. Not sure of the exact date, but it was immediately on
    PK: my return from CERN.

    > I only started using the web permanently when the first omniweb
    > browsers started coming out in 1993 or so.

    PK: The president of the Omni company worked for me one summer on
    PK: HippoDraw just before his senior year at U Washington.

    > So, I seem to have HAD a browser before you, but may or may not have
    > USED one before you.

    PK: Seems I used the browser before you, but you had one on your
    PK: machine. I didn't pay any attention to the Web, even after public
    PK: announcement until I saw a demo on that trip.

  78. sigh... with hindsight... by vistas · · Score: 1

    Back in '89 I wrote a hypertext browser using Windows Write (the little wordprocessor in Windows 1.0 and 2.0) files. This was for a help system for a Windows app that was to come out before Windows Help was available.

    Anyway, the idea was that anyone could fire up Windows Write, type their text (with fonts and colors), add some graphics, and add some little tags (which I based loosely on a combination of SGML and Rich Text Format tags), and Voila! You'd have a colorful hypertext help file! (local files only, unfortunately)

    We put it out with our networking app when Win 3.0 was introduced.

    Then sometime in late '90 or '91, someone said to me... "you oughta look at this thing called WWW. They use URIs to connect files on different machines. But it's text only... maybe you could marry your app up to it..." But by then I was on to newer more mundane things. Sigh.

  79. My memories of early Mosaic and the Web by IvyMike · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was a student at UIUC at the time when Mosaic was developed, and I remember using it in the Sun and HP EWS labs. (Mosaic was installed and maintaned by students, in the lab-wide /scratch directory, for a while). I started using it right before the invention of the "IMG" tag. When it came along, that was a big deal. The NCSA "What's New on the web" page was updated with a few new web pages each day. And that was almost a comprehensive list!

    In any case, the bigger deal for me was when the EWS lab manager (Ed Kubaitis, I think) installed httpd and students were allowed to created their own web pages and serve them worldwide via www.ews.uiuc.edu/~username/ urls. I realized that EVERYONE could be a content provider, not just a select few (as was the gopher model), and this was going to be unstoppable. I even HTML-ized the existing PovRay faq, put it on my student account, sent mail out to the PovRay mailing list, and had hits within a few minutes. That was a rush, too.

    To encourage people to provide content (and get linked) I created the "UIUC People" page, which started as a list to every student homepage I knew about at UIUC. It had four entries. That quickly changed, as you can imagine.

    I don't know who decided to add the "~username" syntax to httpd, allowing mere users to add content to the global web (was it a part of CERN, or did McCool add that to NCSA?) but I'm convinced that was a key factor in getting the early web going. It's certainly what got me interested.

    1. Re:My memories of early Mosaic and the Web by rbrunner · · Score: 1
      I was at the U of I at the time also (and still am). I used Mosaic in the EWS labs and on CS department machines. At the time, FTP sites often requested that users only download stuff after business hours, but here this Mosaic was, downloading HUGE images at all times of the day. Plus, every time you went to a page, you downloaded the same stuff again! (ignoring caching). It seemed terribly wasteful to me. All that extra traffic was sure to cause the Death of the Net.

      I just looked at my public_html directory and noticed that the oldest files in there are from September, 1995. Here's my "favorite sites" from February, 1996.

      Later one of my friends went to work for SDG (the NCSA Mosaic group), and I got to know many of the developers there. This was after the Netscape people had already left, although Mosaic development continued for quite a while. As a result of the Netscape situation, releasing software developed here at the U of I has become a big pain. The University wants to make sure nothing gets out that might have value unless they get their cut.

      I was familiar with Gopher, but never found it very useful. Usenet News rocked, though.

  80. You're probably still using it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    60% of the Slashdot crowd are probably still using Mosaic in an evolved form. Try this menu: "Help->About Internet Explorer"

    Microsoft Internet Explorer
    Version 6.0.26

    Based on NCSA Mosaic. NCSA Mosaic(TM); was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.


    Say what you like about the Microsoft embrace-and-extend experience, this product of Mosaic is still one of the best browsers available - although it's performance is largely due Window's superior hardware support.

  81. good stuff by twitter · · Score: 1

    I can't tell you how funny it is to look at those screen shots from 1993 while using Window Maker.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  82. Re:Linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Linux is dead?
    Then Why oh Why have I been wasting my time in my parents basement these past 30 years!

    Mmmm.. Im gonna start a temp job.. maybe something in Webhosting..

  83. Should've Used T/Nroff as Base? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just wish they had started off by using
    the existing formatting commands of t/nroff
    instead of coming up with another spec; really,
    what's the diff between: '

    ' and '.P',
    '\' and '.B'? There was and still is a
    significant amount of documentation and papers
    written in t/nroff. Manpages would have displayed
    directly into a browser without any conversion
    tools. And yes, I believe t/nroff syntax could
    have easily been extended to handle graphics,
    sound, etc.

    Oh well, water under the bridge...

    1. Re:Should've Used T/Nroff as Base? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > instead of coming up with another spec; really,
      > what's the diff between: '
      > ' and '.P',
      > '\' and '.B'? There was and still is a

      Ugh! Should have read...

      instead of coming up with another spec; really,
      what's the diff between: HTML tag P and '.P', or,
      HTML tag B and '.B'? There was and still is a

  84. I'll spend the anniversary... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    Watching Godzilla and driving my El Camino.

  85. 640k by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gates also infamously said "640k ought to be enough for anybody"

  86. But Tim Berners-Lee wrote the 1st Web Browser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    If you want to read about the real history of the Web by the guy who invented it, you'll want to read about Tim Berners-Lee, in his book Weaving the Web, co-written with Mark Fischetti. As mentioned by a previous post-er, he invented the first Web browser and server on a Next system, and urged people to rewrite it for other platforms.

    Mosaic itself came after other browsers such as Erwise, Viola and Midas popped up at various institutions around the world. Viola, written by an undergraduate student named Pei Wei (at the University of California at Berkeley) inspired the group over at NCSA to try their hand at designing web browsers.

    Mosaic was also far from being a "humble browser". Berners-Lee admits that he felt like that NCSA was trying to take credit , especially when he met with the creators of Mosaic in Illinois for the first time (page 70 of Weaving the Web):


    All of my earlier meetings with browser developers had been meetings of minds, with a pooling of enthusiasm. But this meeting had a strange tension to it. It was becoming clear to me in the days before I went to Chicago that the people at NCSA were attempting to portray themselves as the center of Web development, and to basically rename the Web as Mosaic. At NCSA something wasn't "on the web", it was "on Mosaic". Marc [Andreessen] seemed to sense my discomfort at this.


    And on Page 71:

    To add to my consternation, the NCSA public-relations department was also pushing Mosaic. It wasn't long before the New York Times ran an article picturing Hardin and Larry Smarr, the head of NCSA, (not Marc and Eric [Bina]!!) sitting side by side at terminals running the Mosaic browser. Once again, the focus was on Mosaic, as if it were the Web. There was little mention of other browsers , or even the rest of the world's effort to create servers. The media, which didn't take the time to investigate deeper, started to portray Mosaic as if it were equivalent to the Web. I returned to CERN uneasy about the decidedly peremptory undertones behind NCSA's promotion of Mosaic. NCSA quickly started other projects to get Mosaic onto PCs running Windows and onto Macintoshes.


    One is reminded of Indira Gandhi, the former prime minister of India (who was unfortunately assasinated in a violent manner):

    My grandfather once told me that there were two kinds of people: those who do the work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the first group; there was much less competition.


    I remember myself being shocked when I heard rumors that Time magazine considered putting Marc Andressen as one of the 100 most influential people in the 20th century, or "Person of the Year".

    By the way, does anybody know what happened to Pei Wei? After working with O'Reilly Books, he seems to have disappeared from the face of the earth.
  87. .com.com ? by KurdtX · · Score: 1


    Ok, for those of you who read the article, look in the upper left-hand corner. It says "News.com". Not "News.com.com". That is its address (and btw, the redirect from news.com works just fine). Any other news site on Slashdot is posted by its name (Yahoo, eWeek, etc) not it's address. You don't say "I work at 123 Main St.", it's "I work at ACME corporation". Really people, get over this marketing bullshit and continue with your lives.

    Alright, offtopic. Slashdot.org moderators, do your worst.

    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
  88. Weathermaps and other early browser musings by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    My first experience with the web was with a very early version of Mosaic on an SGI Indigo workstation in 1993. While it was a bit of a novelty at first, it became quite handy when the (USA) national weather service began to make their data and graphics available via the web (rather than just FTP).

    A few months later, we began using Mosaic on our Apple Mac Quadras when NCSA released versions for MacOS and Windows. Because most of my group used Macs or SGIs, we found the whole "web safe color" issue to be funny... our machines were already able to display 24 bit color! (Unlike most Suns and many PCs of the day).

    Netscape 1.x was a very nice upgrade, but things began to go downhill with 2.x. and hit rock bottom at 3.0. (If you think Netscape 4.x is bad, try using Netscape Gold 3.0 for awhile!) Livescript/Javascript was cranky. Plugins were a mess. Java was way too slow. I stuck with Netscape 1.1N and 2.02 on my machines for a long time.

    These days I'm a happy camper with Mozilla nightlies on my SGI and Safari on my Mac.

  89. Someone help me. How many years of goatse is that?

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  90. repost by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    was this not first posted a few weeks ago??

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  91. You all forgot SLAC. by Axe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First webs server and browser in USA was developed at Stanford Linear Accelerator Center - 2 years before Mosaic and with most of its features in. One of the guys who did it As far as I know he got noting out of it..

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  92. In fact.. by Axe · · Score: 2, Informative

    ..the reason that HTML was such a piece of crap is that early folks (like them here at US in 1991 where pretty damn sure that everything will be TeX. It was designed for physics experiment collaborations to use. Everything else was not anticipated..

    --
    <^>_<(ô ô)>_<^>
  93. Just about to celebrate when... by Neurotensor · · Score: 1

    I realised that due to Australia being one of the first countries to experience any given anniversary, it was gone by the time /. mentioned it.

    Clearly /. is behind on the times... by about 12 hours ;)

    I think that anniversaries should be posted about 12 hours earlier for those living closer to the date line. It gives the rest of you a chance to put up some decorations too ;)

  94. Prior art? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this be part of the "prior art" bit that's needed to deal with that patent-holding wanker in New Jersey?

  95. used it last week by zogger · · Score: 1

    --I have an old powerbook 280c that I call my "storm computer". I run it off a 12 volt truck battery and an adapter. Whenever there is a really nasty thunderstorm I shut everything else off and surf with that one, using netscape 2 (or icab). Used it last week, with images off it's really not that bad a surfer.

    Most webpages kinda sorta look like web pages still in netscape 2. Biggest problem is image links that don't have the alt text tag to them.

    Ya, I started surfing a lot in 95 as well, on a 486 running win3.1. Netcom as the ISP. 16 megs of ram to run the OS and apps. Wha' happen? heh

  96. The REAL end of internet by Ze+Kraggash · · Score: 1

    Is here.