Slashdot Mirror


New Diablo II Patch Finally Revealed

colaco writes "After more than a year waiting for the 1.10 patch, Diablo II gamers now have an inside scoop at changes that it will implement. Most of the info on new items and gameplay rules (eg: ladder characters) have been available on Arreat Summit for the past few hours, and are now displayed on DiabloII.net. Blizzard has also offered some clarification. Sources inside Blizzard indicate that more info will be given at E3."

161 comments

  1. Wow, this is neat! by Trespass · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, wait...it's not 1998.

  2. Ack! by edgezone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I swear, I really didn't NEED to have a life. I don't know about many of you, but Diablo II ended up being THE most addictive game I've ever played (eclipsing both Nethack and Civ II no less!). Now there are even MORE things for me to try and figure out (including a bloody new tweaked skill tree? God save me!).

    Well, I'm happy to hear about all this though. I'm hopefull that it will at least dampen the number of rushes and cow levels for a few days. While blizzard has been known to throw a few curveballs with thier patches to Diablo, I'm extremely excited about the chance to jump on there and give them a shot and go hunting after some of the new uniques. Ok. I've wasted too much time talking to all of you already. Off to battle.net.

    --
    -- If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.
    1. Re:Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Armored Core is better.

    2. Re:Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even God can save you from yourself, addict.

    3. Re:Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean, this is fun!

      *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click* *click*

      Oh wait, this isn't Diablo II!!!

    4. Re:Ack! by Cromac · · Score: 1
      I don't know about many of you, but Diablo II ended up being THE most addictive game I've ever played

      Nope, it wasn't addictive to me at all. It was a decent game, but it got dull very quickly for me. I only played it for about a week.

      I'm glad the people still playing it finally have this patch though, it sounds like some good things have been added.

    5. Re:Ack! by pHatidic · · Score: 2, Funny

      I swear, I really didn't NEED to have a life. I don't know about many of you, but Diablo II ended up being THE most addictive game I've ever played (eclipsing both Nethack and Civ II no less!).

      More addicting than Nethack? DIE HERETIC DIE! And may the RNG spit upon your grave.

    6. Re:Ack! by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree. They called it Diablo, because that game truely was the Devil. I spent/wasted waaaayyyy too many hours on that game. Hundreds.

      Then finally I was in Hell, in Hell mode (single player) and something happened to my character (barbarian), and I lost my entire inventory.

      Another time I was using an assassin, and put way too many points into some of the simple skills, which left me unable to kill that big maggoty thing at the end of Level II in Hell mode.

      Then another time I had a sorceress, and I couldn't get through one of the spider lairs in Level III (hell mode)

      The list goes on and on....I've played every character through the game twice, and but could not get through hell mode. I think the barbarian could have done it.

      I eventually had to un-install it, and GIVE THE GAME AWAY just to get over my addiction. But I am frequently heard saying "I can't wait until Diable III comes out...Diablo III is gonna be awesome".

      --
      No reason to lie.
    7. Re:Ack! by TalonKarrde989 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I gave away the game 2 times to try to get over my addiction. Then I went out and bought it again. I finaly got to the point online where I had a char selection screen full of level 99 characters, 10 mule accounts, 3 of which having nothing but SOJs, until I finaly got over it. I. Was. Addicted. So was the rest of the "clan" I was in.

    8. Re:Ack! by DrMrLordX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Um, why would this patch interest anyone? The game has been screwed up ever since the 1.06 patch.

  3. Revealed yes... by toddestan · · Score: 1

    But we will see it released in the next year?

  4. D2! by JorenDahn · · Score: 1

    So.. much.. cool.. stuff.. can't.. take it.. *blacks out*

    --
    Blatant self-promotion: Jerek.net
    1. Re:D2! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know whether you are being sarcastic or not, but "I" have been playing d2 since 1.02 and I am VERY excited about this patch, now I can get back into the game.....I've been off it for a few months because of they gayness that has ensued on the closed realms.....but I cant wait for this patch.

    2. Re:D2! by Sancho · · Score: 1

      And then there's the little tidbit that says, "You can no longer equip items if you have a corpse." making corpse retrieval all but impossible for any class that's not a Sorceress. Even for her it will be difficult. Sure, it solves a bug in the game, but geez, talk about a serious handicap....

  5. I'd like to point out... by Mononoke · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You've been waiting over a year for a GAME to be patched??

    What have you been doing in the meantime, living?

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    1. Re:I'd like to point out... by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      Same thing that happened with Star Trek:Armada. Although I think it took longer than this.

    2. Re:I'd like to point out... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      I'm not twiddling my thumbs and waiting for the patch, really... I play 1.09 when I feel like, and do other things when I don't feel like it.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:I'd like to point out... by juggleme · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The game doesn't need patching in terms of bugs. I'm not saying it's bug free or anything, but the game is definitely worth playing in its current form. Think of this "patch" as a bucket of extra goodies to entice you to keep playing this addictive game until the next one comes out.

      Oh, and I've been playing Angband. Almost as addictive, but it doesn't require as much adrenaline. I've do play other games; it's not like Diablo is the only game in town...

    4. Re:I'd like to point out... by BHearsum · · Score: 1

      I would like to think that this patch has fixed some problems with all the hacks out there.

    5. Re:I'd like to point out... by juggleme · · Score: 1

      Check this post by the admin of the Arreat Summit; he lists the major changes in very broad form, but new "anti-cheating measures" are among them. I've never been a big fan of playing on the realms, but I might have to try building a ladder character or 3 just to see how well I can do...

    6. Re:I'd like to point out... by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't bother, the top ladder characters will be built using teams playing a group of characters 24X7 until they get one to level 99, basically they build the team to level 80+, then they repeatadly kill everything in a level except for a boss, work the boss down to a few hps, then the char they are trying to get to 99 comes in and kills the boss. They use a couple teams so that the target char can jump from game to game repeatadly killing bosses. Last time I played they had level 99 done in under 36 hours.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:I'd like to point out... by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1
      And in the post on the Arreat Summit they specifically list that they're making it much harder to advance beyond Level 70. It also looks like they're fiddling with the Boss monsters so that they are worth more the first time they are killed, and less subsequently. It's hard to say if this will totally eliminate rushing, but it looks like they are trying to address the problem.

      All of this on a game that is over five years old. Pretty impressive considering that Blizzard's chances of making any additional revenue off of the game are near zero.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    8. Re:I'd like to point out... by Army+Eye · · Score: 1

      Even though it's called a patch, that's almost a misnomer. With the features it's offering, It's more like a free, downloadable expansion pack.

  6. The Diablo welcomes the patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And he promises to rain more hell, on more occasions, with more ferrocity than ever before.

    Make your peace.

    Diablo v1.10

  7. I'm not sure I like... by mdbales · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this It takes the whole uniqueness of classes away. I guess it could be interesting.

    1. Re:I'm not sure I like... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Like Barbarians weren't already the ass-kickers of the world. Seriously, I don't know how any other class can make it through all the bosses and Hell on their own. Maybe Paladins.

  8. Please notice! by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

    Much of the stats on diabloii.net for unique items, runewords, set items and skills are all wildly inaccurate. I have so far heard two Blizzard representatives saying they were "WAY wrong" and "ancient data". The leak of information was unintentional and an unfortunate side-effect of a mistake during the web server upgrade process. The leaked patch data seem to be from 1.10 in an early stage of development, likely even before their Quality Assurance team has tested the stuff for balancing, since they are still doing it.

    So... Before you complain about the items and runewords being too powerful (there have been some complaints like this) and that the Necro/Druid didn't get their necessary skill changes, remember that much (most?) of the "revealed" data on the diabloii.net site is simply incorrect or missing.

    For correct information, check Arreat Summit (official Diablo II information site) and the information that will be released during/after E3 (i.e. May 13 - 16 or shortly after).

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Please notice! by Elric+of+Grans · · Score: 1

      Hail Jugulator,

      Come now, you know that the AS is not exactly guarenteed correct information: even what is on it now - and how long after 1.09 came out? - a good deal of the information on the page is still wrong. That almost every item of Set and Unique armour is still listed incorrectly shows where the attention to detail has been...lacking.

      Really, there is a lot of misinformation floating about on 1.10. I say we wait and see what happens: I know I already know the details of quite a few changes, and they seem to suit me just fine, but it's not until I get to pull apart the new Patch_DII.mpq that I'll know just how good or bad 1.10 shall be. After all, who - outside of Blizzard North - possably could?

      --
      addi $v0, $0, 10 syscall
    2. Re:Please notice! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Ah sorry. I should have been more clear that what I was referring to as the "correct info" was the 1.10 info that is currently posted there, as opposed to the highly incorrect info at diabloii.net. The Arreat Summit holds a tremendous amount of information and statistics otherwise, so I'm sure there are incorrect stats over there, although I can't say I agree that almost every item is incorrect. At least when I've checked items, they've matched what I've got. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Please notice! by Elric+of+Grans · · Score: 1

      *chuckles*

      As I said, it's the armour: look at it closely. If you know how DR is calculated, you'll notice a very big mistake on the DR of most items of armour ;)

      --
      addi $v0, $0, 10 syscall
    4. Re:Please notice! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      GFraizer updated almost all defense rating some months ago -- are you saying he has *still* missed some? *sigh* Oh well... :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  9. Fervor in patch information by Navaash+Fenwylde · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To say that this has been one of the most hotly anticipated patches of the year is an understatement. Hell, it's been one of the most hotly anticipaed patches of almost the past TWO years.

    The information went up by mistake Thursday night in the midst of a Blizzard webserver upgrade, and it ended up getting a virtual Slashdotting as thousands upon thousands of information-hungry gamers descended upon the server.

    The problem was corrected Friday morning, but so much of the information has disseminated itself around the Internet that Blizzard posted a partial update Friday afternoon to appease the masses. A Blizzard programmer who had been working on the patch commented independenty on a couple of other message boards that the information that had been uploaded was somewhat inaccurate (is he implying that the items as they are now are BETTER?).

    Any time a patch comes out for a game nowadays, thousands upon thousands of hungry gamers flood the Internet to get it. In the case of Blizzard patches, it seems, getting even a *preview* of that information is enough to clog the hell out of a webserver. Just wait until the patch actually gets released... *g*

  10. Re:Why bother? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Diablo 2, released years later, was nothing more than more of the same. What a disappointment! It was repetitive and tedious: click-die, click-die, click-die.

    D1 was also the same. Could it be the game genre you don't like? All Action RPG's I know is click-die. When they start having more RPG elements, the "Action" part of the genre is usually dropped.

    What made it worse is that saving the game doesn't work. You can save anywhere, but you start back in "town," and all the baddies that you've tediously killed are back alive again. For that "feature" alone, I gave up playing after only a week.

    Waypoints are saved. The reason to why the game state aren't fully saved (dead monsters coming back to life) is because it doesn't make sense in multiplayer and on-line play. And I have a feeling D2 was always much more geared to this environment than D1.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  11. Hacking ruined Diablo II by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Diablo II is a great game, definitely worth £30/$50/whatever of any gamer's money, but it's a shame that the online experience has been ruined for many fans by the ridiculous number of hacks that have spawned up since the game was released.

    Credit to Blizzard, the game's another masterpiece that's playable way past the point where most games just become boring (yes, I know DII can be repetitive, but it's repetitive in a fun way) and it's done all it could to patch hacks, exploits, etc when they've surfaced, but all the duping, hacking of uber items, etc really spoilt a great game for many players.

    I know that I, several friends and many others all stopped playing DII for that very reason.

    I suppose, in a way, Blizzard should be flattered that so many people out there were so obsessed at having the best of everything that they were prepared to hack the game to death. Nobody writes hacks for awful games that are barely played. But that's scant consellation for those of us who's experiences have been soured by a small, mindless minority.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Hacking ruined Diablo II by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree with you, and I guess this is where the idea with MMORPG's and a constant income for the game company to continue supporting the game with a dedicated team comes into play.

      Blizzard are continuing to ban hackers and recently banned 130k accounts (!) but it doesn't happen that often, and it's actually cool they do it at all since I don't think they earn much money from the game anymore, especially when you take the bandwidth costs for their free servers into account.

      Diablo II is a game I think should really benefit from the MMORPG game model.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Hacking ruined Diablo II by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 3, Funny

      If it's still worth it to stock Diablo II on shelves in Office Depot, then it's probably still selling. And it's definitely still in Office Depot.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    3. Re:Hacking ruined Diablo II by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      If it's still worth it to stock Diablo II on shelves in Office Depot, then it's probably still selling.

      I know! It's all those item-dupers and griefers buying another reg key after they get banned again

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Hacking ruined Diablo II by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's all those item-dupers and griefers buying another reg key after they get banned again

      Nope, they got key-gens...

    5. Re:Hacking ruined Diablo II by tnak · · Score: 1
      I stopped playing it when the expansion came out and they changed a bunch of the rules so that a non expansion player couldn't possible play the game. I had a rogue (level 7x) that I could take through hell on the nightmare level by herself. After the dust settled, I was lucky to play the second scene by myself. I refused to be blackmailed into buying the expansion.

      I'm almost over the addiction now. When I read the headline my hands only quivered for a few minutes and my heartbeat slowed back to normal after no more than 15 minutes. :)

    6. Re:Hacking ruined Diablo II by tx_mgm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      heh, nice sig.

      you know what, stuart? i like you! you're not like the other people, here at the trailer park.

      --
      Gentlemen...BEHOLD!
      -Dr. Weird
    7. Re:Hacking ruined Diablo II by asink · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whoa... A minority of players cheat on DII? That is new to me. I've been playing for well over 2 years now, and at the very least over 95% of the players use maphack. A cheat. Hacks, dupes, trojans, and otherwise malicious cheats are now and have been a part of the culture of DII for a _very_ long time. Nonmalicious cheats simply added another element to the game, and gave me more code to play with! It is sad that this drove you away, but why not just go with the flow?

      To answer another question altogether, Blizz has to 'fix' the hacking not because they are dedicated, but because major news sites have picked up on the enormous hacking community. Syadasti was on TechTV a long time ago that covered his mephbot, and Slashdot posted info about d2jsp, a javascript parser for diabloii. That's just off the top of my head, I'm sure there have been other damaging news coverage. They certainly have never been in a hurry to fix dupes or the easily detected hacked items. I don't claim to know anything for sure, but I started cheating because I had played long enough to know that blizz doesn't really care.

      --
      "Hex, Bugs, and Rockn'Roll"
    8. Re:Hacking ruined Diablo II by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      BAH, DiabloII was an abysmal failure compared to DiabloI. Graphics and all were much better, but gameplay sucked. DI you could jump in and run the table in about an hour. DII has no realy nightly gameplay appeal to me.

      Its too tied to object hunting, which means the hacks completely erase any enjoyment when you see some guy selling 100 'legit' Stone of Jordan's...

      I quit it about 2 months and eventually sold the stupid thing after a year of dust collecting. Saddened me.

      The worst part of all is Blizzards opposition to anyone else running a battle.net type of server. So for me they are Obligated to keep their servers running, and its not a courtesy since they dont want you playing anywhere else...

    9. Re:Hacking ruined Diablo II by noims · · Score: 1

      This is exactly why I'm looking forward to the patch so much... the fact that they're separating out ladder characters. It doesn't matter how much the game/economy has been ruined, everyone starts with nothing in ladder play. This means that even if it does subsequently get hacked and items are duped beyond belief, everything's back to normal at the next ladder reset.

      Noims

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world. This is just a tribute.
  12. Kudos to Blizzard by DeeBye · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's nice to see a gaming company support an older game, for no more reason than to keep making it better. They didn't need to (the game is far from bug-free, but it's still very playable), and it makes little economic sense to devote resources to it.

    By most accounts, the 1.10 patch introduces some pretty amazing gameplay changes. It's almost like another expansion.

    Way to go, Blizzard.

    -DeeBye

    1. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Actually, it makes quite a bit of sense economically for Blizzard to continue patches. People are still buying Diablo II and the expansion new off the shelves (I work at a video game store, so I know). Not only that, but how many of us have bought Blizzard games because we are confident of the support (Fuck you, ATI!)? After Warcraft II, I was confident that Blizzard games aren't going to just end up "Game of the Minute" like AvP2 and JK2 did, and so I put up the cash for Diablo II. It definately pays to build a reputation for solid support and development.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    2. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by critter_hunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amazing gameplay changes?! From now on, players above lvl 70 will require more gameplay time, killing even harder units, to gain more worthless levels (since really, levels get increasingly useless, since the items you can use are much more powerful than the additional levels' effects). Add to that that they've added more items, most of which are Elite uniques, and more Runewords, probably all wildly powerful, and Diablo II just becomes even more item based.

      And let's face it, starting a new game every 30 seconds to make another Meph run is just SOO much fun! Go! Kill Meph! Kill him again! and again! ad nauseam!

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    3. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by Babbster · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You're kidding, right? Everything you described (especially "even more item based") is exactly what people wanted when they bought the game, and it's CERTAINLY what people who are still playing the game want - I'm not one of them but I might give 1.10 a try when it arrives.

      I'll admit that "amazing gameplay changes" is hyperbole but what the heck is wrong with someone still enjoying a game and being excited about it? If you enjoy making these kinds of comments, might I suggest visiting the message boards of GameFAQs? You certainly wouldn't be out of place there.

      Whatever changes end up coming in the patch, Blizzard is indeed to be commended for their seemingly endless support of an old game for which they charge no extra money to play online.

    4. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck ATI is right.

      Crappy drivers... waste far too much of my time...

    5. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by critter_hunter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More items IS a good development. The problem is that these items are so rare, it destroys the game. Instead of simply having to level up to gain power - and lets face, going around killing thousands of monster certainly is enjoyable - you have to selectively kill the "big drop" monsters in the game repeatedly to be able to survive the harder difficulty levels. By repeatedly, I don't mean a dozen times, or even a hundred. I mean THOUSANDS of times.

      By adding even more emphsasis to the necessity of having the best items, you make it pretty much impossible to do anything in the game without making that three thousand Meph run.

      I don't know. Maybe people actually enjoy killing the same enemy over and over again, every damn 30 seconds. I personally think it encourages people to use bots to get them the items so they can actually play. Ain't enhanced gameplay to me. (and no, I don't use bots. I usually just stop playing for a few months once I can't get any further without spending days chasing after the game's most elusive items)

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    6. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Anyone who'd actually do what you describe is a sick, sad loser who's in desperate need of therapy. But hell, anyone who'd play this game over and over and over again probably fits the bill anyway.

      Well, at least you aren't out strangling hookers or sacrificing babies. I suppose it could be worse.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    7. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      AvP2 game of the minute ? How do you figure that ?
      That is one of the best FPS I've played, mood, decent balance if you enforce it, it actually requires team play :) JK2 was about as deep as a teaspoon I agree there wholeheartedly.

      You have driver issues with ATI ?!?! I finally got my 9700pro to work correctly and I love it but I do sympathize, it took nearly 6 months and a bazillion driver combos...Turned out to be old Via Hyperion 4in1 drivers :(

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    8. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      In "Game of the Minute," I'm not referring to the quality of the game, just as in how popular it is (judging by game sales and how often it's played at the LAN parties I go to). It was really big for about three or four months, then suddenly no one played it anymore (and JKII was part of that).

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    9. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by zdislaw · · Score: 1
      "I put up the cash for Diablo II"


      But you say you work at a video game store? Is there something wrong with this picture? ;)

      --
      bad sig...no donut.
    10. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      As it says in the article, boss running (and the cow level) will be unprofitable in 1.10.

    11. Re:Kudos to Blizzard by mink · · Score: 1

      One could say you go to the wrong type of lan parties, but it is more likely a regional thing.
      AVP2 is still played in the midwest US.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  13. Re:wow by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

    The skill system will be drastically changed so you'll be able to create new viable character builds with the use of new skill synergy bonuses. The gameplay will also be more challenging and get more random monsters. Ladder characters will be introduced.

    IMHO, a patch unlike any scope I've seen before. Thankfully, the patch won't change its its game genre (Action RPG, i.e. "killing everything that moves"), so those of us who bought Diablo II for what it offered back then won't be screwed.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  14. Re:Why bother? by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

    D1 was also the same. Could it be the game genre you don't like? All Action RPG's I know is click-die. When they start having more RPG elements, the "Action" part of the genre is usually dropped. What about PlanetSide? An MMORPG that's been combined with an FPS. Looks good, but my computer isn't good enough to run it. :(

  15. Still Boycotting... by Hilleh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Still boycotting, still haven't bought War3, still have no plans to buy world of warcraft. Did we forget already?

    Keep your repetitive games that haven't changed since 94 (or whenever Warcraft 2 was released), you fucks. You'll get no money from me until you jump off the bandwagon of sue-happy corporate morons with no concern for civil rights whatsoever.

    1. Re:Still Boycotting... by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Glad that you can say the games haven't changed when you haven't played them. Also glad that a company should be vilified for stopping rampant piracy. And especially glad that Slashdot will always be the refuse of self-righteous whiners like Hilleh.

    2. Re:Still Boycotting... by cabra771 · · Score: 1

      Viva La Resistance!!

      --

      -my other sig is your mom
    3. Re:Still Boycotting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that just goes to show you what a fickle and hypocritcal bunch of people most slashbotters are. I bought Warcraft 3 - It's great! But I couldn't give a toss about bnetd.

      I'd bet that most of these comment posters were queuing at Fry's at 6am on the day of release, then rushing home to post about how "Blizzard didn't play fair with the bnetd team" from their Win98 box....

      Spineless, the bloody lot of them.

    4. Re:Still Boycotting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh heh heh, "civil rights"

      You must have nodded off a lot during Civics class.

    5. Re:Still Boycotting... by MJOverkill · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It wasn't rampent piracy that Blizzard stomped on, it was an open source server program for Blizzard games built using legal reverse engineering methods. Basically Blizzard didn't want their Ad-Running free server to compete against individually run free servers, and so they sued on some stupid charge about "copying battlenet sourcecode".

      Don't be so blind as to take the 'Blessed' Blizzard's side without at least looking into what he was talking about.

    6. Re:Still Boycotting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      civil rights - pl.n. - The rights belonging to an individual by virtue of citizenship, especially the fundamental freedoms and privileges guaranteed by the 13th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and by subsequent acts of Congress, including civil liberties, due process, equal protection of the laws, and freedom from discrimination.

      Where in there do you see "running a home-brewed bnet server?" Idiot.

    7. Re:Still Boycotting... by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      bnetd might have helped pirates get online, but it's still nothing else than a fucking server. reverse engineering a protocol is legal. writing software that utilizes that protocol is legal. what should be illegal, is bullying people with the legal system.

      people on slashdot should be people who understand stuff like this.. oh, but this is the games section after all.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    8. Re:Still Boycotting... by acceleriter · · Score: 1, Troll

      The DMCA-wielding jackbooted thugs didn't see a dime from me since the bnetd assault, either, and never will.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    9. Re:Still Boycotting... by acceleriter · · Score: 0

      Apparently, the slashbot mods don't like facing the truth. I've got karma to burn, bring it on!

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  16. Re:Linux??? Linux ??? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does it run on Linux?

    Does it? Does it run on Linux???


    Yeah. Under Wine.

    Check this out:
    http://www.latte.ca/D2LOD/

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  17. Re:wow by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    > The skill system will be drastically changed so
    > you'll be able to create new viable character
    > builds with the use of new skill synergy bonuses

    If that's the same as my barbarian can kick even more ass, then I'm in!

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  18. Re:Linux??? Linux ??? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    You act like this Website has anything to do with Linux :)

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  19. Being a Mac user... by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    ...this is great. For those of you who don't kow, we get games rairly on our favorite OS so when something as small as a 3 year late patch comes out it's like getting a new game to us. And it's FREE! :)

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  20. Re:wow by pezpunk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    look, this game is over 3 years old and Blizzard is still working hard to add value to it! how can you complain? they're fixing and improving so much, it's, well, it's like a free expansion pack really. Blizzard once again asserts itself as the number one game company in the world. this patch shows why. this patch will generate virtually NO new revenue for them. all it will do is improve their game. kudos to you, blizzard, don't ever change!

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  21. Not again! by magnesius666 · · Score: 1

    Does that mean that I have to rummage through piles of long forgotten CDs for the play disk? Or the ol' lvl 99 necro saves? Even the old framed screenshots of glorious battles started to fade on the wall.. Alas, the saga never ends. Off I go then, polishing that bonespear tip.

    --

    --
    We apologise for the inconvenience
  22. Mucho geek jollies by Omestes · · Score: 1

    " Imagine a Barbarian who can shape-shift into a Werewolf."

    Is it just me, or does this send an odd tingly down the spine?

    Seriously, I have been waiting for a year for this patch. At times I've seriously doubted that it would EVER happen.

    Back before Diablo II, and Lords of Destruction, my and my freinds used to joke about Blizzards inability to EVER come out with something on time, they suffered massive Vaporware Syndrome. (not as bad as 3drealms, of course). But Diablo II came out ON TIME, then LoD came out ON TIME... They got their vapor revenge with this damn patch though.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  23. I for one have been waiting for this... by CashCarSTAR · · Score: 1

    Especially, for the Ladder Play. I, for one will start a new character every level, just to challenge it in a new-style economic system. The smallness of it will make things interesting.

  24. Re:heh by cabra771 · · Score: 1

    I'm actually hoping that this patch will be annouced at E3 along with Diablo III. It would be a perfect match actually. Diable III could be announed for release fourth quarter this year and to tide all of us Diablo fans over, we get this great new patch! Looks like it could be Win-Win for Blizzard and for the players.
    Now I just gotta keep my fingers crossed for a week straight...

    --

    -my other sig is your mom
  25. New weapons = ......... by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    New character types! Finally, spearazons can exist, seeing as their are some elite polearms and spears. Also, many other elite items means more character builds. Finally, barbs that AREN'T swordies (I always went with an ax barb). It took a little too long to come out (after December, which was 3 months after they claimed they would release the patch, I gave up).

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
    1. Re:New weapons = ......... by danny256 · · Score: 1

      Finally, spearazons can exist, seeing as their are some elite polearms and spears.

      Alright, you're going to have to help me out here because I have no idea what you're talking about. Spearazons are the best class in the game. They are the only class that can kill cows in any reasonable time, they can level up the fastest and get all the drops. In case you havn't noticed the game is dominated by spearazon's using lightning fury, which dosn't rely on the damage of the spear but does an effect similar to chain lightning in diablo 1, where huge groups of enemies (cows) get hit with multiple steams of lightning. I got my spearazon too level 99 in 5 days with no support team, try that with any other class.

    2. Re:New weapons = ......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BZZZT, wrong. you're playing a javazon, using javalins with lightning fury.

      spearazons use spears, can only hit what's right next to them, etc. up until now they've been a horrible class to play, although somewhat fun at times.

      javalin = throw
      spear = stab.

    3. Re:New weapons = ......... by mdbales · · Score: 1

      spearazon != javazon

  26. Re:wow by inkedmn · · Score: 1

    Are people still playing this game? I'm no gamer, but i bought diablo 2 for a friend's christmas gift 2.5 years ago for $20 US (approximately one-third of what was charged for it when it was first released). Just playing devil's advocate, but doesn't anybody think this could be a veiled attempt to get all the (Star|War)craft folks to fire up diablo 2 again?

    just a thought...

    --
    well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
  27. Biting off you nose... by Omestes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good for you, then your missing out. I agree with Blizzard, and will continue to agree with Blizzard, until MS buys their parent company, and everything becomes Xbox exlusive, then Blizzard can screw themselves.

    But right now, I would elect Blizzard as God, or Cheif Designer of the Universe. They are the only game company who has come out with QUALITY games, the FIRST time. Every Blizzard patch is like a mini-expansion, rather than a bug fix caused by rushing development.

    What company cold EVER hope to match Blizzards line-up of games? Blackthorne kicked much ass, RnR Racing also kicked ass, Diablo I wasted my whole highschool existance (well, that and MUDs), Warcraft was the first genre making RTS, Warcraft 2 was the best RTS until... STARCRAFT! Any game that causes Koreans to starve, must be a damn good game. Then we have Diablo II, the most anticpated game of 2000, and the only game to live up to it's hype. Then LoD, which also lived up to it's hype. Then of course Warcraft 3, which is a new genre making RTS, on that caused those silly command and conquer people to copy it's formula (to a point), and the upcoming Worlds of Warcraft look like it may just be the ONLY MMORPG that I will consider playing, which is saying alot since I HATE that genre. And from the Frozen Throne previews, it looks also like quality stuff.

    My only complaint is Ghost. What a steaming pile of crap, not releasing it on PC. I don't WANT to buy an Xbox, or a PS2, or even a GC, my compy works fine for gaming, and I just spent $300 to be DoomIII compliant, and Unreal 2 capable. And now I'm supposed to fork over however much for a damn peice of propritary console crap, just to play a game... bah.

    I'm rambleing, just woke up, got sake hangover... I'll shut up.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    1. Re:Biting off you nose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not MORE good and original games come out for consoles than for your PC. Why not just drop the money for one of them. It won't even cost you as much as a damn graphics card.

    2. Re:Biting off you nose... by asink · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Every Blizzard patch is like a mini-expansion, rather than a bug fix caused by rushing development.


      ... wow. You really missed out on last December's server patching, eh? Go rummaging around forums, and _eveyrone_ legit and non-legit players were being constantly kicked for 'excessive packet usage' because they set their filters too tightly. This was the most poorly thought out patch for any game that I have seen.
      But hey, I usually don't play games -- DII is just the heroin of video games... one try and you're hooked for life. That doesn't mean that I agree with _any_ of their post-release politics or changes(including D2X). The things they do to whitewash their reputation are at the top of my personal list of reasons to dislike them. Bnetd is nothing in comparison to the way that they treat their customers.
      --
      "Hex, Bugs, and Rockn'Roll"
    3. Re:Biting off you nose... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I agree, the server patch was pretty henious. And come to think of it, 1.08 was REALLY nasty. But the server patch is pretty much okay in my books, since I really dislike bnet, nice in theory, but in practice, you get what you pay for, a bunch of '1337" lamers. And the server patch was trying to semi-fix this problem, and if it went to far, GREAT, at least their trying. Most gaming companies wouldn't care, you already bought the product, so who cares about the enviroment, I mean DII isn't marketed like evercrack, online atmosphere isn't important to marketshare. But then again, it must pay off, since Blizzard has millions of chronic repeat customers, they see the blizzard logo, and buy it, no thought. (I was unemployed and broke when LoD, and War3 came out, and gambled (literally) to buy LoD, and sold shit load of old hardware for LoD, and called in ALL my old debts)

      And 1.08... well, sucked. Changing the game to something that people didn't payfor, AFTER they paid for it sucks, ethically. But you don't have to patch... The path to whatnot, and something about good intentions.

      But then again, you BOUGHT D2X? No? Even after what they did in 1.08.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    4. Re:Biting off you nose... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Two reasons. I can't pick which one, all three have good games... Xbox is graphically superior, PS2 had square and some other good series, and GC has Metroid, Zelda, and Contra.

      Second; there is nothing wrong with my PSX, Dreamcast, and NES. They aren't broken, the DC is showing signs though :( Also with both Nintendo and Sony talking already of GCII, and PS3 already, it makes me wonder why I should bother.

      Also, I am a PC person. I had a C64 before I could walk, I grew up on an 808x. I like my compy, I think it has better graphics. That and, MODS. I had counterstrike before any of these silly console kiddies ever heard of it. I get to play Tribunal, no Xbox gamer does, I'm also gonna be able to play the next Morrowind Expansion, before any Xbox person. Same for all the UT2k3 mods, no community for Championship.

      I also dig strategy, and console don't play that.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    5. Re:Biting off you nose... by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Then of course Warcraft 3, which is a new genre making RTS, on that caused those silly command and conquer people to copy it's formula (to a point),

      People who say Warcraft 3 was a "new genre making RTS" must be blind.

      War3 takes many ideas from its predecessors and quite a few ideas (namely, heroes that level up and replay feature) from the Myth series. One could argue that 3D terrain sort of followed so it isn't taken directly.

      And in my opinion, Myths work better because there's no micromanagement whatsoever (If I buy a strategy game, I don't want to play an economy simulation, thank you), just the strategy, and every unit is able to "level up".

      (Off-topic rambling: Now I only wish Mythdev would release Myth II's new version for Linux too (1.4 is for Win/Mac only at the moment, I'm still stuck here with SDL1.1 statically linked binary and "bungie.net" when everyone's gone to PlayMyth and such), and port Myth III to Linux, even when the latter is probably wishful thinking...)

      On the other hand, Blizzard never claimed they're innovative as such, and while they make cliched games, they at least make these games very very pretty and shiny in visual, audio and gameplay sides. Blizzard's garbage is for most part playable and enjoyable garbage, and that's unusual! =)

    6. Re:Biting off you nose... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Kay, I concede some points. Total Annihilation was the first RTS with 3d untis, and terrain, and is still the best RTS out there, if you can find it, and/or stand the community. The "Hero" system is a bit of a borrow, the fantasy world is, yes, a copy of all the other Warcraft series, which is to be expected for a sequel.

      I personally like micro in War3, TA is my other game, and it has NO micro, just horde tactics, and overkill. So micro is a nice change, having to think about unit choice is also nice.

      But what Blizzard is good for is WORLD. Not story, mind, it is good, but not groundbreaking. But the Warcraft WORLD is wonderfully crafted, and planned. Same thing with Diablo, someone put a lot of thought into making the universe colorful. Like the LoTR or Dune of video games, there is more than just what you see going on.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    7. Re:Biting off you nose... by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Can't decide? Buy all 3.

      With E3 this week, you can bet there'll be some announcements of price drops on the consoles.

      Even without it, with a bit of shopping you can find store-specific deals that'll give you a console plus a game (sometimes of your choice) for free.

      Combine that with Half.com or your local used game store, and the only problem I see is having the *TIME* to play all those games.

      Yeah, yeah, PS3, GC2, XBox2 are definitely in the works, but who cares? Knowing that the video card in you bought for your system will look pathetic and sad 18-24 months from now didn't stop you from buying one, did it?

      Also, as you point out, consoles tend to remain useful even after they've left the marketplace.

    8. Re:Biting off you nose... by Triv · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you had the same problems I did.

      If you're like me and care more about gameplay than graphics, get the PS2.

      If you want a LARGE library of titles and a built in DVD player, get the PS2.

      If you want your games CHEAP, get the PS2.

      That's why I went with sony on this one, plus one more major reason - controllers. The XBox controller is huge and badly designed. Gamecube's might be alright, but I still tend to like 'em small. :)

      Triv

  28. The Diablo II Experience by magical1 · · Score: 1

    After playing the game for over two years, making a lot of cash on eBay, and basically living off the proceeds, I can say one thing, never, never believe what blizzard says. Until 1.10 comes out nothing is final, nothing they have said could/will happen, its still up in smoke (prolly the illegal smoke aswell)... they keep bumping up the date, then taking back what they said, It was supposed to be out last october but was delayed, there seems to be something to always delay it. They also say they are working on deleting bugged/duped/hacked items and they never do, and people are still running around with these crazy insane items. They then post stuff on there site pertaining to the patch and then remove it hours later saying it was a mistake, so what do you believe, all I know is it will be out whenever blizzard gets off there ass and posts the patch.. And I heard that there shipment of monkeys (for the beta test) was delayed so who knows when it will be out.

  29. Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diablo 2 died when Blizzard went 2+ years without releasing a sorely needed update, and except for a few small instances, turned a blind eye to rampant hacking on the realms. Although this could help keep a few people playing it a little longer, most of us who finally realized that Blizzard didn't give a damn, gave up and won't be coming back.

    1. Re:Too little too late by Peyna · · Score: 3, Informative

      84,000 people playing 40,000 games of Diablo 2 right now; I've seen numbers well above 100,000 playing at any one time, so I guess a lot of people still like it.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Too little too late by asink · · Score: 1

      yes, a lot of people who use bots like it. That's 2 people/game. Most populated games have an average of 4 people during busy times(8 for cow games, 1 for those hoping to get rushed through act 2). This is very rough, but 2 people/game is way off. Another explanation for the 40,000 games is that people are using bots rampantly, inflating the user number and signfigantly decreasing player/game ratio. This has been obvious ever since mephbot became popular.
      Not to say that a lot of people don't like it, but certainly not as many as are advertized. And I hate to back up a point I am arguing against, but there are many realms, and I'm not sure if that number takes that into account. Then there are the bnetd realms, which are starting to gain popularity in a big way.

      --
      "Hex, Bugs, and Rockn'Roll"
    3. Re:Too little too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, i still play it - and i hate it.. just can't stop playing

  30. Blizzard not the only great company out there by LPetrazickis · · Score: 3, Informative

    The guys at Paradox Entertainment, the makers of Europa Universalis II and Hearts of Iron, also release patches years after the original game had come out while working without pay. Now, that's what I call true gamer geek spirit.:)

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  31. I hate to be a pessemist... by TxdoHawk · · Score: 1

    ...but I'll be excited when I download it. However, I have more faith in Blizzard than say, Team17, who've promised us patches to Worms Armageddon for even longer.

    You can twist around the no extra revenue argument and say that companies have no reason to update "old" games, but you need only look to Half-Life to see how much supporting your fanbase can get you. For Team17 however, I'll be holding off on Worms 3. Not an outright boycott, but I want to at least wait a month or two. Team17 haven't been doing well in keeping up with their games patch-wise, and I sadly don't anticipate Worms 3 to be much different. Hopefully they will prove me wrong and buck the trend.

  32. Stopping Piracy? by vertical_98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Also glad that a company should be vilified for stopping rampant piracy.

    Ahoy Me Matey!

    ok, maybe it wasn't funny, but why is sueing(sp?) Bnetd.org stopping rampant piracy? If they where really worried about it, they would make their servers the best so that no one would want to use the bnetd servers. (gasp!) No instead of putting out a superior product they claim DMCA violations and copyright infringement.

    Of course, that just makes us 'self-rightous' whiners.
    Vertical

    --
    72 CD D7 52 D0 7E D8 47 44 91 D5 84 D1 59 F1 A9-This is my 128bit integer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Stopping Piracy? by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      but the thing is, no matter how good they made their servers, pirates still wouldn't be able to use them, so they would use bnetd.

      So your solution is no solution at all!

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    2. Re:Stopping Piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no matter how good they made their servers, pirates still wouldn't be able to use them, so they would use bnetd

      Oh, PLEASE

      Since BnetD has stopped development, has piracy stopped? Are there no pirate copies of Blizzard stuff floating aroung? Do you need a server to play Blizzard games?

      No, no, and no.

      Claiming that BnetD encourages piracy is like saying that Dell, or ASUS, or ${OTHER_COMPUTER_MAKER} encourages piracy. It's just too stupid for words.

  33. Dungeon Siege by DeadBugs · · Score: 0

    Say what you will about MS.... But Dungeon Siege is to Diablo II what Quake was to Doom. Fully 3D. Better graphics, characters, game play and story. Plus the ability to control a large group instead of just one character.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:Dungeon Siege by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find very few people agree with you on this. DS is like D2 with eye candy and most of the fun removed.

    2. Re:Dungeon Siege by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      But Dungeon Siege is to Diablo II what Quake was to Doom.

      Naah...

      Dungeon Siege is to D2 what a retard is to Einstein.

      Even Diablo II: The Point & Click Adventure look amazingly complex when compared to the DS Auto-Play System. It's a great sleep pill though and half-way to Progress Quest.

      Seriosly, I find DS to lack character and atmosphere. You just kill and get the combat and magic skills distributed for you depending on how you kill the guys, with even the killing more automated than in D2, and with less innovative features like gambling and crafting. But damn, the graphics are totally awesome. Like if that would help. :-P

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Dungeon Siege by stewartjm · · Score: 1

      Dungeon Siege certainly is pretty. But game play? The only thing I ever did of any consequence while "playing" was to press the all drink potions button. Other than that it pretty much played itself. And the characters, items and spells were just generic. All that happened as you leveled up and found new stuff was that the numbers got bigger. No new strategies opened up. No cool new moves. Nothing. At least the world builders did a good job. I think the only thing that made me finish it was being able to see and explore each new area.

      With any luck next time they'll devote more time to making a game to go with their awesome engine.

    4. Re:Dungeon Siege by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      Say what you will about MS.... But Dungeon Siege is to Diablo II what Quake was to Doom. Fully 3D. Better graphics, characters, game play and story. Plus the ability to control a large group instead of just one character.

      Except that I could play Diablo II just fine through a firewall performing NAT, but the MS Direct Play crap didn't work at all unless I opened inbound ports and did manual static mappings. Screw that. I threw the game away after getting bored with the single player game and just went back to Diablo II.

  34. More than likely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Profits can be had by other means than retail sales. I wouldn't be surprised if this is a, "Hey! Remember this!" ploy in advance of a Diablo III.

  35. Another Diablo II site by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    http://www.stratorgy.com ... as long as everyone else is posting d2 sites they know of. ;) ..few people talking about the update there too. Just in case anyone cares.

  36. People just don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the reading I've done about this patch, it's my understanding that Blizzard QA does a 3 week testing cycle... and if they find a bug, the bug is patched, and they start the 3 weeks over again... so even if they're 22 hours in on the last day, and they find a bug, it's going back to be fixed and another 3 weeks of testing await... Blizzard is to be lauded, if nothing else, for the fact that it's taken so long for this - the only thing I can think of that they should've done was made this 3 week cycle more well known, so that people would understand why it's taken so long.

    You can't please everyone all the time, but for anyone who's ever programmed, they know what it's like to come across some really obscure little bug, and have to retest the whole thing. Blizzard wants nothing more than to put out as tight code as possible, and I for one applaud them for that.

    -TKK

  37. Suggestions for Diablo 3/new patches by petrus4 · · Score: 2, Informative
    >Keep your repetitive games that haven't changed
    >since 94 (or whenever Warcraft 2 was released),
    >you fucks. You'll get no money from me until you

    This is true. I'm not boycotting Blizzard, but to a large extent *gameplay wise* Diablo 2 as it currently stands is mainstream RPG lite. The LOD game expansion only really made the game worth looking at..."Classic" Diablo 2 was almost completely unplayable to my mind, due to very rapid onset of boredom. The game is phenomenally well packaged, with outstanding MAX work, it's true...including raising the bar as far as in-game cinematics are concerned...and it's also true that on a purely stat level, some of the weapons are nice...but I can't remember the last RPG I've seen for the PC that didn't have substantially better gameplay than D2...It's mind-numbingly repetitive for my money.

    The annoying thing is, that while they got some things right, it could have been a much better game than it was...Some ideas for Diablo 3:- (assuming it ever happens, of course)

    • License and adapt the AI used in Black and White from Lionhead. Applied in a dedicated sense to D2's hirelings, you could end up with skilled trackers who know the terrain of the different areas, and could dramatically increase their use of tactics over time. This way as well as different NPCs being more expensive when having more life/skill points, you could also make them more expensive based on their level of knowledge of the terrain and tactics employed when dealing with specific monsters. Best of all, because it's a dedicated scenario with only a limited number of creatures, you don't need to worry about the AI needing to be too open-ended. If you were really scared of that, you could have specialist hirelings who were better at/only knew how to deal with certain kinds of monsters, so that players who were having difficulty in certain areas could say simply hire the NPC to get through that specific area. The possibilities are endless. Hell, you could even go really crazy and apply this to the monsters if you wanted to, although unless you grew a template for each of those, the monsters probably wouldn't live long enough to get good.
    • Make the hirelings' inventory possibilities as complete as the real players. While Battle.net and multiplayer capabilities do of course exist, there are always going to be people who play single player games. Coupled with the above suggestion, this would give single players a party member with very close to human functionality in some areas.
    • Study some of the other RPGs that have come out since. Many of them use if nothing else, much more complex animation sequences for sword moves for example. You could have for example a scenario where in a town there is a magic training NPC and a weapons training NPC. Assuming a person has enough money/xp/whatever, they could go to each one of these teaching npcs. Probably what you'd perhaps want to do is devise a series of forms/groups of related moves in different tiers/levels, and then based on char level or money, the character could work through each one. For primarily non-magic using characters, to me focussing on mundane moves that can then be optionally augmented with elemental boosts would be the best way to go there. The Assassin has a basic example of what I'm talking about here...but a lot more can and should be done with it.
    • Inject atmosphere back into the game. D1 was a truly fantastic game in terms of the environments/music/overall feel...by contrast, although some of it is equally great, a lot of D2's areas are sterile to the point where you almost need Prozac to get through them. This is an intangible, and it's difficult to describe exactly what I mean here...but I think the main thing to remember here is that less is more. Looking at it, one of the main reasons why Diablo 1 was as good as it was is because it was almost exactly the right length...D2 would probably be dramatically improved IMHO by nixing Act 2 in particular altogether.

    Blizzard obviously

    1. Re:Suggestions for Diablo 3/new patches by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0, Funny

      "License and adapt the AI used in Black and White from Lionhead. Applied in a dedicated sense to D2's hirelings" So you can teach your hirelings to poop on command?

      --
      Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
  38. Hrmm by Fancy78 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have used Filter Level 5 for years. I never realized I'd miss out on all these great ASCII penis pics : Who knew?!

  39. Some issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Diablo2's Direct3D support may have problems.
    Diablo2's DirectDraw support is the only way for non-3Dfx users to play.
    Diablo2's Glide support is excellent and to this day even on Linux and Microsoft Windows systems; running Diablo2 with Glide on a 3Dfx graphics accelerator yields the best framerate and lowest latency...i'm a Voodoo2 SLI owner, it's faster than my highest ranked GeForce 4 Titanium.

    Obviously, what would make an excellent companion with Diablo2 patch 1.10 would be an openGL renderer, but Blizzard is bussy with other things (War3, Diablo3, masturbating on the battle.net servers, etc.)

    Another thing that will piss off linux users is Diablo2's use of SecuRom technology that prevents natural use of the programs. The Diablo2 playdisc is using SecuRom technology; it is not available on standard Wine (http://www.winehq.com) and is only implemented in the *registered* version of WineX (http://www.transgaming.com) unless your friend gave you their *registered* WineX or you found it on a file sharing network. Hence, because of SecuRom and it's anti-freedom patents against its opensource usage, you can't use Diablo2 on standard Wine without a custom Diablo2 patch and this somtimes has problems when using the battle.net service; battle.net checksums the game.exe file IIRC and the common-day dload.exe doesn't always hide game_crk.exe correctly ontop of game.exe. It's been a while, maybe standard Wine has finaly abled itself to implement this redirect properly, but I'm busy obviously with other tasks suited to world domination...

    I'm anti-Microsoft all-the-way, so this isn't an option for me to use Wine or any shitty Microsoft flaw-reimplementation projects. Give me native applications (full-performance), or give me death!

  40. that sucks by JahToasted · · Score: 1

    My Diablo II character was just deleted because I dared to have a life for 3 months (second time this has happened). Well, I guess I could always start over again.

    1. Re:that sucks by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      My Diablo II character was just deleted because I dared to have a life for 3 months (second time this has happened). Well, I guess I could always start over again.

      Could be worse.

      On my system Direct3D 8 blew up and didn't work for over an year. Luckily D3D7 and earlier and OpenGL games worked just fine, and as long as I got Neverwinter Nights and Myth series and Mechwarriors and Warcraft 3 things were just fine. (And Nethack, of course, ran. =)

      When I finally was able to fix that, well, I didn't have disk space on which to install D2 for weeks. And now, I have just that latter situation again.

    2. Re:that sucks by dalassa · · Score: 1

      Or you could be in my situation. OS X 10.2 broke D2:LoD and reinstalling hasn't helped. That and Blizzard support keeps telling me how to make it work under OS 9, that's real useful.

      --
      Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.
  41. BnetD new feature: Piracy Promotion by vertical_98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So only pirates use Bnetd? Stopping that awful program will wipe out pirates? Pirates of D2 are unable to go online?

    No, No, and NO!
    I can make a copy of the 3 disks and send them to a friend, he can then install D2, start an open TCP/IP game and ......guess.....play on line. Can he play on Battle.net? Yes, but not if I'm playing also. Can he play on a Bnetd server? yes. Can he play me online? In an open game. Can he play solo? yes. Can he make multiple copies and play with people on a local net? yes.
    So please, please, I beg you. explain how bnetd promotes piracy? What? They don't check for CD-keys? OMG! Those bastards! (slight reality check: They have NO way to check for keys)
    So my solution is a solution...because if it was that damn good....I'd pay to have a full legal copy. And if I didn't think it was worth it...I'd not pay for it.
    What you are saying is that pirates wouldn't pay to play....So how do you know they would anyway?
    Vertical

    Sorry if I don't see it. I do love D2 and have 2 legal copies. I also have a Bnetd server on my home lan. Oh well, I'm sure you're going to tell me how everyone else who uses Bnetd is a pirate and I'm really rare. Maybe I just want to believe that piracy isn't as big a problem as Microsoft/RIAA/MPAA/etc. would have us believe.

    --
    72 CD D7 52 D0 7E D8 47 44 91 D5 84 D1 59 F1 A9-This is my 128bit integer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:BnetD new feature: Piracy Promotion by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      Ok, you would, but you aren't everybody.

      For instance, for every person on here saying "I buy the CD if I like the mp3s, there are a thousand people saying "I couldn't give a toss".

      I know that pirates don't pay to play, because until recently, when I had a job, I was one of those people that didn't.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
  42. Diablo 2 is *still* a top selling PC game, weekly by ThresholdRPG · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In case anyone thought Diablo 2 was no longer relevant in the PC market:

    http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/deltaforceblac kh awkdown/news_6026076.html

    Best-selling PC games for the week of April 13-19, 2003:

    Rank / Title / Publisher / Average Price
    1 / Delta Force: Black Hawk Down / NovaLogic / $39
    2/ Command & Conquer: Generals / EA / $46
    3/ The Sims Deluxe / EA / $44
    4 / The Sims: Unleashed / EA / $29
    5 / Battlefield 1942 / EA / $47
    6 / Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets / EA / $18
    7 / Zoo Tycoon / Microsoft / $28
    8 / CSI: Crime Scene Investigation / Ubi Soft / $30
    9 / Diablo II / Vivendi Universal / $21
    10 / Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos / Vivendi Universal / $39

    http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/commandconqu er generals/news_6026444.html

    Best-selling PC games for the week of April 20-26, 2003:

    Rank / Title / Publisher / Average Price
    1/ Command & Conquer: Generals / EA / $46
    2/ The Sims Deluxe / EA / $42
    3 / Delta Force: Black Hawk Down / NovaLogic / $39
    4 / The Sims: Unleashed / EA / $29
    5 / Battlefield 1942 / EA / $47
    6 / Diablo II / Vivendi Universal / $21
    7 / Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos / Vivendi Universal / $36
    8 / Zoo Tycoon / Microsoft / $27
    9 / CSI: Crime Scene Investigation / Ubi Soft / $30
    10 / Battlefield 1942: The Road to Rome / EA / $19

    -----------

    That's right. #6 and #9 for the most recent weeks of PC sales data.

    Pretty amazing for a 3 year old game.

    --

    -Michael
    Threshold RPG
  43. Who cares about Diablo II... by elite+lamer · · Score: 1

    ...when Ragnarok Online is still free?

    Anime-based MMORPG with players from all over the globe, free (for now at least). Grab Beta 2 while it's hot.

    --
    Oops!
  44. Somebody tell me when the beta closes again. by bluemeep · · Score: 1
    This current beta stage is absolute hell thanks to the throngs of freeloaders that swarmed in and sucked all the fun out of it. I'll play again when I'm sure I can go five minutes without some jackass stealing my monster drops and calling me a "n00b" because I didn't pick it up instantaneously. Yes, "SSJ4GOKUVEGETATRUNKS27", obviously I'm the clueless newbie.

    Sadly, I'm not exaggerating any there.

    1. Re:Somebody tell me when the beta closes again. by elite+lamer · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, what server are you playing on? I've been playing on Loki and I can honestly say that my time with Ragnarok has been really positive; that's why I'm recommending it. There were some idiots, but idiots are present in any online community. For the most part, though, the people I encountered were friendly and experienced, though often hilariously illiterate.

      "How do I get to Izlude?"
      "u go down sum ten turn kthxnbai"

      --
      Oops!
    2. Re:Somebody tell me when the beta closes again. by bluemeep · · Score: 1
      I had a knight on Chaos until the wipe... I tried Loki and it was absolutely awful. Basic social conduct seems completely absent there -- I've been KSed, looted and sworn at more times in the couple days I was on there in the whole three months of the closed beta. I'm guessing it has something to do with most of the iRO vets staying on Chaos, so the population of Loki is mainly new players... Either way, I think I'll be waiting until it closes again or is p2p before I give it another go.

      Maybe I'm just jaded. Glad you've had a good time with it, though.

  45. Why I bought a GC.... by jalagl · · Score: 1

    I had the same concerns as you did, but in the end I finally broke down and bought a Gamecube.

    The reason (at least what I keep telling to myself): even though my computer is a P3 w/ a GF2MX Graphics card, I don't really want to upgrade it yet again only to play games. The other things I use my home computer for are web, email, transfer music to my minidisc and some light Java development for moonlightning jobs, and it does all those functions pretty well. Even the games I've been playing lately (RTCWolfenstein and Warcraft 3) get a decent framerate on my machine.

    And consider the games. You HAVE to play the Zeldas on the Gamecube. And Metroid Prime. And Ikaruga. They are all great games. I am a huge Metroid fan, and have played through all of them (except for MFusion), so when I noticed the great reviews the GC version was getting I finally made up my mind.

    It also helped me for the decision that I managed to combine a couple of offers Nintendo was having at the begining of the year, so I got a free game with the GC (Metroid), and Zelda64 with the new Zelda game. The console, some memory, and 3 games for less than it would have taken to upgrade my PC.
    They have actually been very good investments, I am still playing Z:OoT and haven't even started Z:WW, and I got the GC in february. (been very busy at work - see below)

    The only place I play network games is at work (after hours, of course ...), and the machines there have more than enough capacity for this and the next generation of games - right now we're playing UT2003 and a little WC3.

    So far, I've been very happy with the purchase.

    --
    -.
    1. Re:Why I bought a GC.... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I almost broke down and bought a GC, when metroid came out. Though Zelda isn't really my taste anymore, I wouldn't have minded Zelda64, but I still did't like it as much as the SNES one, or the original. Ditto for Windwalker.

      But my problem is the opposite, after the upgrading I can't afford jack. But also I'm going to be able to play DoomIII as its meant to be played. Also I do FPS and RTS gameing, and consoles are not the medium for them, unless I want a confusing network adapter, and a keyboard. I guess I'm an old gamer dog, no new tricks for me.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    2. Re:Why I bought a GC.... by mink · · Score: 1

      Thats Windwaker not Windwalker.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  46. This ... on Slashdot? by DaemonGem · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why are patch releases being posted on Slashdot? If every patch release were posted on Slashdot, then there would be no space for other articles. That being said, why single out Diablo II? I could just as well send in an article about the Descent 3 1.4 patch, or at least, I could have, when it came out. Are we now going to get a Slashdot article where people can talk about how long they've waited for this patch to come out all the time? Surely there's better news than this.

    Perhaps you will rate me as flamebait, though I assure you that this is not meant as such.

    -Dae

    --
    "Alle reden vom wetter. Wir nicht." - SDS Sozialistischer Deutscher Studentenbund.
    j00 4r3 3n73r1ng l337 w0r1d.
    1. Re:This ... on Slashdot? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      If you'd actually read the article, and look into the situation a little, you'd see that this patch has been in the works for years, and it's for Diablo II, of all games. This isn't just another monthly patch for the game-of-the-week.

      In any case, if you don't want to know about it, don't read the damn story :P

    2. Re:This ... on Slashdot? by k_187 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the Diablo II 1.10 patch was supposed to be out "real soon now" (tm) for over year. All my friends that play D2 have been complaining that Blizzard shifted all their focus away from D2 to Warcraft III and so the 1.10 patch became something like Duke Nukem Forever albeit on a much smaller scale.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
  47. Games and spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I notice that the standard of spelling is particularly bad in the new games section. Shocking.

  48. Is that a fscking M$ Joystick for an Icon??? by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Not only that it's a piece of M$ hardware (on Slashdot!!), it's also a exceptionally shoddy piece.
    Natural Keyboards aside, the other hardware M$ has to offer - albeit somewhat better than their software - is usually overpriced and not very good.
    Whatever, please use a CH Joystick or a Razer Boomslang for an Icon. I'm serious.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  49. Will they fix the OS X version? by metamatic · · Score: 1

    The graphics acceleration under OS X is totally hosed, it makes the game *slower*. Will 1.10 fix this, I wonder?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  50. heh by j0nb0y · · Score: 1
    Had this come out back in August, when I was still playing, it would have renewed my interest in the game.


    As it stands, I am not going back just for this patch. I've kind of realized how stupid the game is in the period of time since I quit...

    --
    If you had super powers, would you use them for good, or for awesome?
  51. Unequipped corpse retrieval by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

    Amazons can distract monsters with Decoy and Valk
    Assassins can use traps and shadows
    Barbarians can Howl
    Druids can summon pets
    Necromancers can cast Terror
    Paladins can use Hammers, Fists, and Vigor

    1. Re:Unequipped corpse retrieval by Sancho · · Score: 1

      And none of those except maybe the Decoy/Valk are effective to any degree in Nightmare or Hell. Don't forget you have to get TO your body, with all your scare techniques, which can sometimes mean travelling a fair distance from a waypoint.

    2. Re:Unequipped corpse retrieval by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      Your body may be a fair distance from a waypoint, but eventually it will be near your Town Portal.

  52. Worth it to eliminate corpse popping by Von+Rex · · Score: 1

    I'd much, much rather have increased difficulty in corpse recovery and remove the accidental chance of your corpse popping and losing all your items. Not to mention the various lameass stunts that people do to try to get your corpse to pop.

    It's not like the penalty for dying in Diablo II softcore is very great anyway. Might as well make dying slightly inconvenient.