Slashdot Mirror


Playstation 2 Linux Cluster at NCSA

Mr. Spock writes "The National Center for Supercomputing Applications is looking at scientific computing on the Sony Playstation 2. They've set up a cluster with 65 compute nodes. They're running Linux for Playstation 2. What will they think of next?"

232 comments

  1. Imagine a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Beowulf cluster of Playstation 2's... Oh wait! They did, nevermind.

  2. More info by cascino · · Score: 5, Informative

    More info on the processing power of the PS2 as applied to computational chemistry.
    Basically, this study shows the PS2 has roughly the computational linear algebra power of a PIII-600 (the then fastest processor on the market).

    1. Re:More info by nukey56 · · Score: 1

      Quote from the parent's article: Furthermore, the GNU compilers we used do not employ the vector units on the Emotion Engine processor.

      I would suspect this particular cluster would bypass these benchmarks dramatically, because they are making use of the most powerful unit in the system.

    2. Re:More info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Basically, this study shows the PS2 has roughly the computational linear algebra power of a PIII-600 (the then fastest processor on the market).

      And therefore 1/2 the speed of the cheapest desktop PCs you can buy today. Except that you get more than 32 megabytes of memory on the PC.

    3. Re:More info by shaitand · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly it at least has a risc processor.

    4. Re:More info by jean-guy69 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      ahem... not exactly if you read carefully:

      45MFLOPS, which is better than the 36MFLOPS obtained for the Intel machine using assembler that has been heavily optimized. If anything, this performance estimate is conservative in favor of the PS2, because our primary goal was a working assembly dot product in macromode and we have made no attempt to optimize the code. For example, our code uses only three of the VPU registers, and a speedup of up to 4x (the latency of the floating point multiply instruction) may be obtained by using all of the available registers.


      so, using *unoptimized* ASM on PS2, PS2 is 25% faster that the intel machine using *heavily optimized* ASM.. and optimizing code would probably earn BIG performance gains (400% !?) on the PS2.

      taking the sentence the the letter there is a potential of 500 % the speed of the PIII 600 on the PS2 for this particular calculation.
    5. Re:More info by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the fact that the Sony PS2 implementation was not even close to optimised for the comparison...the PS2 is also priced very modestly.

      Also, a PS2, unlike a PC (or even an XBox) probably consumes less power and does not require multiple fans per unit to keep from overheating (cheaper to operate and more reliable due to less moving parts).

  3. Wow! by d3kk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine a cluster of...

    Oh.

    1. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's old!
      Imagine two clusters of...

  4. imagine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    imagine two thirds of the comments mentioning a beowulf cluster of something!

    oh wait..

    1. Re:imagine.. by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

      Yes.... so you get modded down.... for being right... happens a lot

    2. Re:imagine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on mods, that was the only actually funny cluster joke I've seen on the story so far.

  5. Yay... by banka · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's good to know that our tax dollars are going to something useful and scientifically worthwhile!!

    1. Re:Yay... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I Highly doubt they paid a dime for any of it... I'm sure they told Sony what they wanted todo and Sony said "Hmm, 65 PS2's and you'll make a cluster out of them and we'll get good press? Sure, where would you like the pallet delivered..."

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    2. Re:Yay... by tarzan353 · · Score: 1

      I Highly doubt they paid a dime for any of it... I'm sure they told Sony what they wanted todo and Sony said "Hmm, 65 PS2's and you'll make a cluster out of them and we'll get good press? Sure, where would you like the pallet delivered..."

      Nope, completely wrong. Not trying to drop names here, but I know some of the people that were closely involved in the project. None of it was free, and it was done completely without documentation from Sony.

      But of course, you still got a +5, informative. Nice job, mods.

    3. Re:Yay... by l810c · · Score: 1

      Not trying to drop names here, but I know tarzan1.

    4. Re:Yay... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Well then Tarzan353, educate us. Obviously your in the know and we're not.

      So, how was this funded? Was type of research are they doing on this cluster? Was this an academic endeavor? How is this pushing forward understanding of vector based HPC? Are they going to give their findings back to Sony?

      The reason I voiced my "opinion" of the situation was because of the experiences I've had dealing with companies.

      Most of my friends (and several of my co-workers) cut their teeth writing drivers for hardware that was donated to them by the manufactuers. They'd call up the company and expain they were a student and that they wanted to write a driver for [x] device. Voila, 5 would show up in the mail including all kinds of developer documentation and pin out diagrams.

      Hence why I thought that they probably gave Sony a call and said "We want to build a cluster of these and we'll share any knowledge we get while doing it" and Sony said "That sounds like a great investment and sent them all the stuff". To me it seemed logical. Everybody wins. Since Sony's next generation playstation is supposed todo all kinds of clustering it only makes sense that they have some understanding of any short comings that might be found in the current generation of hardware so they don't carry those mistake over to the PS3. So, if some entity with shitloads of experience in clustering is willing to just come along and do it for free (as in no cost to Sony) I would think they'd get the cost of 65 PS2's back in R&D savings X fold.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  6. Well. by Pres.+Ronald+Reagan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This seems like a fairly expensive way to make a cluster. $200 for each PS2 and $200 for each Linux kit? That comes out to $26,000. You could buy computers with more RAM and faster processors (than a 400MHz MIPS) for about the same amount.

    --

    Abortion is advocated only by persons who have themselves been born.
    --Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:Well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could the problem here be the long term life of the cluster? I don't know clustering well, but was under the impression they work best with hardware that's very similar, if not identical. I'm very likely off the track there though!.

      With playstations, it's dead certain that if the cluster were still in use 5 years from now you could pick up replacement hardware easy-as, where finding similar PC stuff to your original buy would need a lot more hunting around

      again, I'm probably wrong, and maybe need more crack

    2. Re:Well. by praksys · · Score: 1

      Judging from the abstract it looks like they plan to take advantage of the PS2's ability to handle graphics. I doubt if you could get a PC that could handle graphics as well as a PS2 for under $400.

    3. Re:Well. by htmlboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This seems like a fairly expensive way to make a cluster. $200 for each PS2 and $200 for each Linux kit? That comes out to $26,000. You could buy computers with more RAM and faster processors (than a 400MHz MIPS) for about the same amount.

      the benefit comes with problems that can be highly optimized to work on the ps2's vector processor. for pure vector operation, the graphics system in the ps2 provides better bang for the buck than chips with less specific capabilities. it doesn't do much, but what it does, it does it pretty quickly.

    4. Re:Well. by damiam · · Score: 1

      It's called an Xbox.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:Well. by BigFootApe · · Score: 1

      A large part of any [large] cluster infrastructure budget goes into cooling. With MIPS chips, or PowerPCs, there is little or no need for extra air conditioning where your plant is installed.

    6. Re:Well. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I doubt if you could get a PC that could handle graphics as well as a PS2 for under $400.

      You can. IIRC, my Radeon original (now worth about $45) outperforms the PS2. Heck, the PS2 often chokes in games like Vice City, giving me frame rates that I am guessing are about 2 or 3 fps when there's "too much" action going on. I doubt anyone sells a PC that bad anymore...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:Well. by WetCat · · Score: 1

      why not to build it in Alaska?! Or in Antarctida?!

    8. Re:Well. by fodi · · Score: 0

      ...because Antarctida is a figment of your imagination :)

    9. Re:Well. by computechnica · · Score: 2

      Except that M$ doesn't want any one to use there precious X-crap for anything other than what Bill says. Sony opened up it's platform for Linux almost from the start.

      Check out this fun use for a PS2 - Qcast . All without Uncle Bills promission or a Mod chip.

    10. Re:Well. by tevman · · Score: 1

      You can. IIRC, my Radeon original (now worth about $45) outperforms the PS2. Heck, the PS2 often chokes in games like Vice City, giving me frame rates that I am guessing are about 2 or 3 fps when there's "too much" action going on. I doubt anyone sells a PC that bad anymore...

      actually i think thats more of a software problem, ive noticed lots of bugs in ps2 games lately, seems like they're game development is really rushed and theres not enough time for doing alot of the more cosmetic work, like those few seconds in a game wehre the frame rate crawls.

      the first objective in making a video game is a working product, regardless of bugs, then it is played and played by testers... but testers miss stuff

      --
      sig is broken try again tomorrow
    11. Re:Well. by Henry+Stern · · Score: 2, Interesting

      US$26k for a cluster is DIRT cheap. The prof next door to my supervisor made a 32-node Xeon cluster last year for a modest $125k by using commodity parts, an extraordinary feat of frugality. Most new clusters used for scientific computing cost US$500k or more.

      Unfortunately for me, the kind of work that I like to do does not easily fit into a node with only 32MB of memory. This rules out any excuse I could have to apply for a grant to build a desk out of a cluster of PS2s. ;)

    12. Re:Well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ps1 could be multiplexed, via emulation on consumer hardware too.

      You can run x ps1 emulations (someone say you can get power of amiga x n virtual nodes too), this is why webserver on whatever cheap nodes you can find is interesting.

  7. Makes me wanna... by Demanche · · Score: 1

    Install Windows 2003 Server on a few p166's and cluster 'em so can they actually boot up ;) But really.. im sure a good ol' pentium 166 will do better clustered then Playstations.. this seems like they are running out of things to research ;x

    --
    Mod me down im a newf (wiki)
    1. Re:Makes me wanna... by luzrek · · Score: 1
      I'm pretty sure that the PS2 has a 300 Mhz MIPS processor. Not that it is spectacular, but it isn't that bad either.

      Personally I'ld rather have 60 600Mhz Eden Mini-ITX's going.

      --

      Galium Arsenide is the material of the future, and always will be.

    2. Re:Makes me wanna... by t0ny · · Score: 1

      I think they did it so they could say "ooops... um, that PS2 doesnt work quite right. We're not going to use it... maybe if I take it home it will work..."

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    3. Re:Makes me wanna... by Electrode · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm running Windows 2003 Web Edition on my PMMX-166 laptop and it's quite usable. In fact, it is a tad faster than Windows 2000 Professional. Of course, Linux beats them both in the performance category. :)

      I think the biggest determining factor in how fast Win2K3 runs on such a machine is not CPU speed but the ammount of RAM that is installed. The aforementioned lappy has 144 MB of EDO in it, which probably makes a huge difference.

      In other news, it appears I've gone completely and utterly off topic. To redeem the value of this post somewhat: I don't think that any release of Windows newer than NT 4.0 would run very well on a PS2, considering its paltry (by windows standards) 32 megs of RAM.

  8. damn you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What do we have left to imagine _now_?

  9. Since this came up by shepd · · Score: 1

    Hopefully this won't be too offtopic:

    Anyone know where to buy/download PS2 linux without buying another HDD/network adapter?

    Those of us with the HDD & Network adapters would love to know...

    Or do we have to buy a special HDD to get this to work?

    I'd love to show all the X-Box modders that the PS2 can still be just as useful.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    1. Re:Since this came up by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      If you already have a hard drive hooked up to a PS2, the only thing that you lack is the Linux disc, which is special since it has a Linux boot loader, and a PS2 boot loader togeather. That is a special disc, and is only sold with the kit. If you have a modded PS2, you might be able to use a copy of both discs (first is copyright Sony, and the second is GNU).

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:Since this came up by acceleriter · · Score: 1
      you might be able to use a copy of both discs (first is copyright Sony, and the second is GNU)

      Is that some kind of end run around the GPL? Or is the first disk something that locks you out of most of the hardware, then allows the booting of Linux?

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

    3. Re:Since this came up by corsec67 · · Score: 0

      It is most definitly a GPL thing. Sony doesn't want ANY posibility of their boot-strap for the PS2 to be covered by the GPL.

      it is a pain in the ass, but they REALLY want to cover their asses with some titanium - mithril layered britches.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    4. Re:Since this came up by shepd · · Score: 1

      Well, of course my PS2 is modded. :-)

      Is it possible to boot it with just the GNU disc and a modchip? Or do I still have to buy the kit if I want to avoid pirating anything?

      Just wondering... Thanks!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    5. Re:Since this came up by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      if you already have a NIC and HD for the PS2, then most of the kid is useless to you, and Disc 2 is GPL, so you can make a copy of that. Disc 1 is the special disc, and you might be able to call sony and have them send you a Disc 1.

      Disc 1 is NON-GPL, and had only a loader on it, with some sony documentation.

      Disc 2 is GPL, and contains linux

      http://www.playstation2-linux.org is the site you should check out.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    6. Re:Since this came up by brandorf · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC (I own the kit, btw)

      Sony put everything they themselves created on the first disc. Their bootloader, PS2 technical documentation (covered by a NDA), and thier software development libraries.

      Basically the Linux packages are on the second disc.

      --


      Bork Bork Bork!!
  10. Is this legal? by BitterOak · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I know Microsoft claims XBox modding is a DMCA violation. Is any modding necessary to put Linux on the PS2?

    If so, this could be a great DMCA test case, since NCSA is a respectable organization, and would present a much more sympathetic case in court. Even if they don't go after NCSA, others could use it as an example.

    XBox modders, for instance, claiming substantial non-infringing uses could point to the NCSA PS2 cluster as an example.

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    1. Re:Is this legal? by cascino · · Score: 1

      Sony themselves sell the kit. No problem.
      (Then again, I suppose Sony has been known to sue itself in the past...)

    2. Re:Is this legal? by JohnCub · · Score: 5, Informative
      Sony sells the linux kit for ps2. So I'm guessing they are saying it is ok to put linux on your ps2.

      http://www.us.playstation.com/hardware/more/SCPH -9 7047.asp
      Linux (for PlayStation®2)
      The Linux kit (for PlayStation 2) allows you to use the versatility of the GNU Linux operating system with the power of your PlayStation®2 computer entertainment system as a fully functional desktop computer!

      • The Linux Kit (for PlayStation 2) includes:
      • Linux Kit (for PlayStation 2) release 1.0 software
      • Monitor Cable Adaptor (for PlayStation 2) (with Audio Connectors)
      • Internal Hard Disk Drive (40 GB) (for PlayStation 2)
      • Network Adaptor (Ethernet) (for PlayStation 2) [10/100 Base-T]
      • USB Keyboard (for PlayStation 2) & USB Mouse (for PlayStation 2)


      ~$200
      --
      -= Why can't I add 'Anonymous Coward' to my list of Foes? =-
    3. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony themselves sell the kit. No problem.

      (Then again, I suppose Sony has been known to sue itself in the past...)


      I think you meant to say SCO?

    4. Re:Is this legal? by Dunark · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ok.. I am so sick of seeing this.. the xbox modding may or may not be a 'DMCA violation' but that is not the point.. xbox modding is ILLEGAL in any country with even the most basic of electronic intellectual property laws as you are using an ILLEGALLY modified BIOS image.. so please, stop acting as if it is evil of the microsoft oppressors to be claiming this as so.. so believe what you want, but unless you are using cromwell, xbox modding on the most basic level is equivalent to piracy

      Just out of curiosity, where is the restriction on xbox usage spelled out? Is it a plain and obvious label on the outside of the package that a buyer can see before they pay for it? Or is it hidden somewhere inside the package?

    5. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how does usage even come into play here? jesus.. which zealot modded this up? even if it is not stated anywhere, (and it surely is within the manual, on the license, and marked on every seal you must break while disassembling your xbox) the copyright is IMPLICIT even without any explicit statement.. at least in any western country anyway

      so by your logic, joe's ftpd 1.4 which has no installer and specifies no license but has clearly defined licensing restrictions is free game for me to modify and distribute licensed?

    6. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I just ran down and checked. There's a warning on the cardboard box that says the software on which the X-Box runs is licensed, not sold. You may not disassemble or re-engineer this software in any way, except as specifically provided for by the laws of the place in which you purchased and/or operate the machine. I'm paraphrasing because I didn't bring the box back upstairs, but the three points, licensing, no disassembly, and except for your country's laws, are all on there.

      Further, in the Dashboard there's a menu option, I think it's About, which has the entire license agreement for the BIOS. Since the X-Box is hardware, not software, you can return it within fourteen days at most stores even if you've opened the box. It's therefore reasonable to have the agreement in the hardware, since you can easily get your money back if you don't like it.

      On the bottom of the box you've got your dire warning that opening the case will burn your house down, electrocute you, and void your warranty. So it's all quite clear.

      Where the DMCA comes in is just that any security measures Microsoft takes to enforce the agreement may be protected. Disassembling the BIOS may be simple intellectual property infringement, but if you broke encryption to do it, that may be under the DMCA. You don't need to put the DMCA on the box any more than you need to put the current fine for copyright violation in the beginning of a book for it to apply or the current fine for grand theft auto on the inside of an automobile's hood for that to apply. The laws of the United States are applicable whether you know the text of the law or not, which is, I believe, what the poster above was saying.

      The reason the warnings are on the box is that it helps enormously in court to argue less about whether the customer should have known that disassembly would be considered reverse engineering. Clearly, if you take apart your bicycle, that isn't reverse engineering. Just looking at a bicycle tells you how a Platonic bicycle is made. Reverse engineering a bicycle means exensive measurements to make a specific bicycle part.

      In court, Microsoft could spend a long time arguing with the defendant about whether reading the BIOS with a standard chip reader is "just looking at the machine," since reading a chip with such a machine is done tens of thousands of times a day. Having this argument may take only a few hours of court time, but that's an entire legal team sitting there, plus the time doing research on precedent, preparing briefs.. the billable hours are huge. It saves a lot of money to say right on the box "the things inside this box are trade secrets, so don't peek." Nothing anybody says on a box is free from challenge in court, but having said it earlier speeds up the process and increases the chance of winning that point.

    7. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whole idea that a peice of hardware that I OWN being illegal to make modifications is pretty stupid to me, especially if did it for myself and never sold anything produced. i can see the point about modifying the hardware to play copied games due to the ease of copying them, however, the fact that it's illegal to make modifications to something that i own if i figure out how it works? ridiculous. f-ing ridiculous.

    8. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh huh.. well, let's say you just bought some brand new shiny software.. which came with a low end license giving you access to a certain set of functions within the software.. although the other set of pricey functions still exist within it.. so by your logic, since you 'own' the software you are clearly entitled to modify it in order to gain access to the high end functions within it, right?.. if you answered yes then keep it to yourself, if you answered no then all of your soul searching can end here because there is very little difference between these 2 situations

    9. Re:Is this legal? by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 1
      xbox modding is ILLEGAL in any country with even the most basic of electronic intellectual property laws as you are using an ILLEGALLY modified BIOS image.. so please, stop acting as if it is evil of the microsoft oppressors to be claiming this as so.. so believe what you want, but unless you are using cromwell, xbox modding on the most basic level is equivalent to piracy

      I live in Scotland. Here we have a fairly basic law called the Sale of Goods Act, which says, in effect, if you sell me something, it's mine and I can do what I like with it. Any 'license' which says I can't is just illegal as in against the law.

      So I can change any chip or use the whole thing as a flowerpot if I like, and there is nothing that Microsoft can do about it. This is true in just about every country in the world... except, of course, the <irony>Home of the Free</irony>.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    10. Re:Is this legal? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      This is no different from buying a mainframe and hacking it so you can use the other 31 processors.

      Sure, you get no support (which, in the case of a mainframe, makes it useless), but if you bought it, you do what the hell you like with it.

      If you have features in a product, and for whatever reason you don't want me to use them, then DON'T SELL THEM TO ME! (And by sell, I don't me ethereal BS "I don't want you to do X with this" crap, I mean don't sell me media that contains those features).

      Next thing you know it'll be immoral to use unleaded gas in a leaded gas car because the sticker on your dash says "Leaded gas only". Yeesh.

      Heck, in your case watching vob files not linked to menus on your DVD is immoral. Give me a break.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:Is this legal? by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 1
      C'mon man, you KNOW damned well that modifying code that is protected by the copyright laws in most countries is illegal. The problem with todays society is that nobody expects to 'man up' and take responsibility for their own actions. I know.....we'll just sue someone else for our own mistakes. Everyone is so quick to cry foul and try to play ignorant. Yes, sharing (stealing) music, software and Microsoft code is illegal....even if it doesn't explicitly say so on the box. It's just a chance you take that you won't get caught. Has it really come to such a lack of common sense that we need to label everything as to avoid lawsuits?? WARNING: Inserting (insert random body part here) into fan may cause injury.

      Is it illegal to modify your Xbox??? No.... Is it illegal to modify and use Microsoft code in the Xbox....YES!!! What really has to happen is a totally clean BIOS needs to be made that doesn't use Microsoft code (such as the Linux BIOS), then I would assume that you would be somewhat safe posting that....just don't get caught circumventing the encryption in the damned thing....hmmmm..............

      Just don't get caught (scratches head)

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    12. Re:Is this legal? by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 1

      If the license is illegal, it would automagicly be revoked. You have no legal right to use it, and should return it immediately and request they stop selling them.
      And if you think Microsoft has no reach outside of the US, Read about the Microsoft vs LikSang suit.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    13. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are you talking about?.. if by hacking the mainframe to use the other 31 processors you had to remove a section of copyrighted data, disassemble it, and modify it.. then yes, it's no different.. but you seem to imply that making any modification is illegal, and that's not at all what is true.. if you were to gain access to the other 31 processors via some form of legal hardware modification as in soldering on a pic or ten then that does not violate standard ip/copyright laws.. it is only when modification of SOFTWARE is involved, not hardware

      vob files, what the fuck are you talking about? this is not MY case.. this is GENERAL LAW..

    14. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      again, the point is missed.. you can use the xbox as a flowerpot, flush it down the fucking toilet, beat your dog with it.. you can dump every piece of software from it's bowels.. under standard law that would be completely legal.. but the moment you either come into possession of the modified BIOS or alter the BIOS that you legally decrypted/dumped, you have committed a crime

    15. Re:Is this legal? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >if you were to gain access to the other 31 processors via some form of legal hardware modification as in soldering on a pic or ten then that does not violate standard ip/copyright laws.. it is only when modification of SOFTWARE is involved, not hardware

      Why? What, because EEs aren't as respected as CS profs?

      I have no moral problems with hacking software I paid for to do what I want. It gets murky when the stuff is given to you, but if it's paid for? No moral qualms at all.

      In fact, up until a few years ago, there were even US companies providing cracking services to people who were fed up with hardware locks, 100% legal.

      It all depends on wether your country supports copyright law or unsigned contract law. In the US, the unsigned contract is paramount, whereas in most other countries, if the unsigned contract is at all unreasonable, it's ignored.

      Now, if you are a proper company and sign a deal and break it, that's a different question. 'Till then, hacking an X-Box at home is no different from writing notes in a book in most countries.

      >vob files, what the fuck are you talking about? this is not MY case.. this is GENERAL LAW..

      You were suggesting that if the authors take pains to hide something from the user, that it is illegal/immoral for the user to use it. A vob file (for the uninitiated, that's a video/audio stream for a DVD) that isn't linked to a menu (or elsewhere in the DVD) is effectively hidden unless hacked out by playing it on a computer.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    16. Re:Is this legal? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      You know where in gods name did fair use ever go ?

      You paid for the XBOX, Microsoft got to set the price, for your money you got a collection of physical objects. What anyone does with those objects is their damn business, they are theirs.

      Whats next car parts that will only work when attached to particular vehicles ? The police Hunting you down for altering your ignition control computer. Or how bout the car you can only drive in the country or state you bought it in.

      Driver: Hello OnStar my car just stopped as I drove into nevada.

      OnStar: Sorry Sir you only own a California License for that car.

      If I buy a television is sony going to start trying to tell me that the only game I hook it up too is a PS2 ?

      This is once again another example of Microsoft trying to monopolize a market. You can argue DMCA, and modifying products in violation of Illegal licenses all you want, But its been plain and well known that monopolization is illegal.

      So yes you can say what you want, but when microsoft sells a product at below cost to extend its monopolistic control of the computing experience, and further attaches an illegaly restrictive license on the product, thats wrong and its where civil disobedience should begin.

    17. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Why? What, because EEs aren't as respected as CS profs?

      no, because the hardware you own is a tangible thing.. you own the physical device and every individual part which makes up it.. but the software on it is as intangible as music on a cd or words in a book.. you do not own any of these

      >I have no moral problems with hacking software I paid for to do what I want. It gets murky when the stuff is given to you, but if it's paid for? No moral qualms at all.

      that's great.. for the record, neither do I.. but it's the legal ones you should be worried about

      >In fact, up until a few years ago, there were even US companies providing cracking services to people who were fed up with hardware locks, 100% legal.

      haha, those were not US based companies, and that was not '100% legal'

      >It all depends on wether your country supports copyright law or unsigned contract law. In the US, the unsigned contract is paramount, whereas in most other countries, if the unsigned contract is at all unreasonable, it's ignored.

      this is basic ip/copyright law.. I'm sure it applies in most countries

      >Now, if you are a proper company and sign a deal and break it, that's a different question. 'Till then, hacking an X-Box at home is no different from writing notes in a book in most countries.

      no

      >You were suggesting that if the authors take pains to hide something from the user, that it is illegal/immoral for the user to use it. A vob file (for the uninitiated, that's a video/audio stream for a DVD) that isn't linked to a menu (or elsewhere in the DVD) is effectively hidden unless hacked out by playing it on a computer.

      man.. I was not suggesting that at all.. I said that if the user can circumvent the protection via some means which involves either logically tricking the system (swapping discs or something) or physically modifying the HARDWARE (this could go as far as hot patching BIOS segments as it is being accessed but you would surely have to argue that one in court) then it would surely be legal under IP/copyright law.. but I mean you should see how disassembling and modifying the BIOS is a clear violation under IP/copyright.. the DMCA would be another story

    18. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOOD LORD does anyone understand this is NOT DMCA territory.. this is fucking basic IP/copyright.. SOFTWARE IS INTANGIBLE, LIKE MUSIC, LIKE WORDS, LIKE ART.. WAKE THE FUCK UP

    19. Re:Is this legal? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      If I buy a magazine I can take it apart and make a collage.

      If I buy a book I can quote passages, I can take out the pages and use them as wall paper.

      If I buy a cd or a record, I can use samples in my own work, If I really want I can take it to a club and use it for scratch mixing.

      This is whats known as fair USE. When you buy something its Yours.

      Copyright is the right to make copies, and control the distribution of copies. It has never untill now been about whats done with the copies. Modifying what you own has never before been prevented by any law.

    20. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, you can

      yes, you can

      no, you can't without explicit permission

      >This is whats known as fair USE. When you buy something its Yours.

      this is not fair use, you do not own the pictures in the magazine nor do you own the words in the book.. you own the physical medium on which the information is stored and nothing more..

      >Copyright is the right to make copies, and control the distribution of copies. It has never untill now been about whats done with the copies. Modifying what you own has never before been prevented by any law.

      how many court cases have been tried over books using unquoted excerpts or songs in which musicians ripped off another's hook? is this not modifying what you 'own'?

    21. Re:Is this legal? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      >no, you can't without explicit permission

      Yes I can. The Word of the day is Derivative work.

      Can you say it, Derivative Work, I knew you could.

      As to court cases, lawyers are parasitical creatures that exist only to raise the misery index.

    22. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      give me a break.. derivative work is a fine fucking line.. if you sample some unknown artist or say the THX test sound.. and find yourself rich and famous, be prepared to lose every last cent of profit you had earned.. this has happened countless times.. sure you are certainly correct if you are referring to sampling eminem at joe fuckwad's ravehouse.. who is going to expend time and energy on you in that case, but you are still breaking the law as would be proven if your single went triple platinum

      I don't even understand how derivative work even applies to xbox bios images

    23. Re:Is this legal? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      >I don't even understand how derivative work even applies to xbox bios images

      It is very apparent, that your lack of understanding extends much further. But for the sake of staying on topic, Assume I have purchased an xbox. The xbox contains contains a rom image which is their in part to make it work, and in part to restrict just how well it works. I take apart my xbox add in a couple of wires and I now have the ability to modify the contents of the rom. For the sake of argument lets say I make changes that allow my box to do new things, Play Mp3's, DVD's, run linux, hook up to an external videocapture device and work as a TIVO. The changes are my work.

      What microsoft has done is used the DMCA to forecloses what would have been normally covered under fair use. Whats more They are using the DMCA to restrict the use of the X-box so they can pursue both a monopolistic and more than likely illegal business strategy.

      If you don't think so try to buy 3rd party replacement cartridge for your inkjet printer.

      If this type of thing isnt stopped soon, you can look forward to a furture where your house will only accept doorframes,locks, appliances from authorized vendors. Where your car will only use certain brands of gas.

      The tragedy will be that no one will be informed about the little gotchas in the "license agreement" untill after they have bought the product and can't return it.

    24. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well gee fucking whiz.. thanks for clearing that up, now I see how it applies.. it's great that your definition of derivative work is as wide as anything that exists.. I'll get right on adding a few lines to the last tom clancy novel and get it right back on the shelves..

      AGAIN, what I am arguing has nothing to do with the DMCA

      >It is very apparent, that your lack of understanding extends much further

      thanks for that line, it confirms your existence as the wasteland I assume it to be

    25. Re:Is this legal? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Thank You for confirming my statement. I will amplify, You must be someone who feels they have everything in life, and there is no one who can or will take it away from them. I will also go further that you are young probably uner 22 certainly under 25. This comes from your obvious naievete about how the world works, and lack of knowledge about why it isn't wise to extend the rights and priveleges for those that allready have to many of both.

    26. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, under 25 like 90% of the slashdot audience.. I'll take your absurd off-topic psychoanalysis as an abdication as I am not arguing about extension of rights or privileges or the realities of DRM and big business.. I am arguing what is fact, nothing more and I had never claimed otherwise.. I do not agree with some of the applications of law in this manner, but I am surely not going to pretend that they do not exist and pander to a bunch of hypocritical borderline hippie malcontents.. THESE are the people who have no idea how the world works.. and they probably never will

    27. Re:Is this legal? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Its funny I usually consider it a win when an opponent resorts to profanity to make their point in a debate. >> GOOD LORD does anyone understand this is NOT DMCA territory.. this is fucking basic IP/copyright.. SOFTWARE IS INTANGIBLE, LIKE MUSIC, LIKE WORDS, LIKE ART.. WAKE THE FUCK UP

      Of course the simple action of contradicting yourself is a pretty good way of throwing in the towel.

      >>I am not arguing about extension of rights or privileges or the realities of DRM and big business.

      Or these >> give me a break.. derivative work is a fine fucking line..
      >>I am arguing what is fact, nothing more and I had never claimed otherwise.

      This is not about basic anything, let alone about basic intellectual property law (as if that wasn't an oxymoron to begin with).

      This is about what was a badly written law, and is now being used by microsoft to extend their monopoly on PC operating systems to home entertainment systems, an item they see as capable of displacing and or erroding their core business.

      >>hypocritical Borderline hippie malcontents ?

      You sir, with that statement, have managed to say considerably more about yourself than anything else. As an aside, the demographics of the readership would probably shock you, as no doubt it will when you get seriously burned by the things you have been posting about.

    28. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, I see.. let's not let it end

      oh my yes! my use of profanity was not at all out of anger from seeing the same DMCA throwback but it was an abdication to your silly partial logic responses

      I'd ask you to explain the contradictions in those statements but I would be afraid of the longwinded pointless garbage you'd spew

      there is no extension here, intellectual property is intellectual property and it is being applied as was intended.. and I am not arguing about DRM, I am not arguing about big business.. just the application of the law

      oh, I forgot you dismissed derivative work's fine line between THEFT/infringement and silk screening a few Campbell's soup cans.. I apologize

      oh yes, what does that say about me indeed?.. does it say that I believe it to be incredibly ridiculous how moral everyone around here is except when it comes to microsoft products? the RIAA? the MPAA? does it speak about how I wish for an explanation on how xbox modification instructions are a daily valid news source? oh my how we pick and choose our laws.. oh.. and I am quite frightened of getting 'burned' by arguments the caliber of yours.. but by now I realize you're just another zealot, and should really stop posting

    29. Re:Is this legal? by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      Seeing as thats the best you can come up with for the last words on this particular thread, you may have them.

      Goodnight young one, you have my sympathy.

    30. Re:Is this legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hoho, what a clever last stand!.. save your sympathy for yourself, as you clearly are someone who carriers such a heavy dose of unjustified arrogance that you are surely compensating for some major holes in your life.. good night sweetheart

    31. Re:Is this legal? by shepd · · Score: 1

      >but I mean you should see how disassembling and modifying the BIOS is a clear violation under IP/copyright..

      Okay, I see what you're talking about now, no problem.

      I am still pretty sure that modifying software you own to do what you want is legal in some places (definately not the US). I know that, for example, EULAs generally don't hold up to a judge's scrutiny in Canada (the computer company I worked at was sued for not following EULAs closely, but wasn't convicted), as unsigned contracts don't really mean all that much here. Whether that gives you the right to modify the software to your own ends, well, I don't know. I would think so if you had a legitimate reason (such as installing X-Box linux), and I know many Canadian companies who have been investigated by the RCMP for "possibly" breaking the law but never did get in any trouble for selling X-Box modchips [usually pre-flashed] (generally the places that do that also sell satellite hacking hardware, which is illegal [the hacking, not the hardware] in Canada).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  11. Iraq by Tweakmeister · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the news story about Iraq buying 3000 PS2's (for missiles?). Regardless, the chips inside these are indeed quick!

    I just hope someone gets on the RC5 train with these...

    --

    Colossians 2:8

    1. Re:Iraq by sould · · Score: 4, Insightful
      According to Zdnet:


      A source close to Government Intelligence services in the UK said: "This is complete cobblers. For a start, the suggestion that there's a shortage of standard PC hardware in Iraq is silly. PCs are commodities like cars and washing machines, and they can get as many PIII and P4 PCs as they like, sanctions or no sanctions".

      I feel I should make a WMD joke here...but I won't.

    2. Re:Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I feel I should make a WMD joke here...but I won't.

      Windows of Mass Destruction

      there

    3. Re:Iraq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news the US finally found evidence for weapons of mass destruction in iraq:
      Varius Play Station 2 found in iraqui homes gave the US intelligence the final clue that the whole iraq was a clustered PS/2 doing calculation work for iraqui scientists. The new evicence will be prsented before the UN soon.

  12. Unfortunately... by dfn5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    the nodes started competing with each other and yelling "w00t w00t". In the end no work got done.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  13. Re:1 more cluster.....and I'm gonna by aeinome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cluster fuck. Happy now?

    --
    When you don't have a leg to stand on, don't even get up.
  14. You know what, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what? I really approve of this. This has got to be the future. I don't mean as in Playstations, but in all kinds of weird, old, or "useless" hardware having Linux installed on them and being used for useful work.

    Why Linux? Well first of all, because it's so portable, you can run it on the weird hardeare. A much bigger issue though is that you don't have to pay Microsoft, Apple or Sun for 65 licenses (or however many you would need). Just imagine if they wanted to do this with Windows. Just think how much that would cost!

    1. Re:You know what, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you don't have to pay Microsoft, Apple or Sun for 65 licenses
      No, you just have to pay Sony for 65 licenses.
    2. Re:You know what, by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      talk about useless hardware... with intel hardware being dirt cheap, the labs where i work have about 25 dec alphas running at 100mhz with 32 megs of ram. for fun, we're clustering these with linux. it should be fun

      --
      I write code.
    3. Re:You know what, by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --I dunno, maybe it was just the weird feeling I got after discovering that all these PS2's are running ancient Kernel *2.2.1*... Couldn't they at least have upgraded to the last 2.2 kernel rev?

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  15. Cheap, easy (erm..) and powerful by valisk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Seems like a nice use for the playstation2 and rather nice of Sony to provide a Linux kit for the machine, it is a bit expensive though but I imagine it is quite a bit cheaper than a cluster of comprable SGI Mips boxes. In fact it wouldn't surprise me to find out that this cluster cost less than a single SGI Workstation.
    Looks like cash strapped science labs all around the world may soon be rolling in CPU cycles on a failover cluster built of Kids game consoles and Linux, and the heavy duty workstation manufacturers will see their stock slip even further.

    --

    Economic Left/Right: -0.62
    Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.69
    1. Re:Cheap, easy (erm..) and powerful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) this is not cheap
      b) this is not easy
      c) this is NOT powerful

  16. Beowulf? by axxackall · · Score: 0, Redundant
    What will they think of next?

    Perhaps, of beowulf cluster of such clusters? :)

    On a serious note, does anyone know what type of cluster they use and what kind of tasks are they solving on it?

    --

    Less is more !
  17. Reminds me of this cartoon by muon1183 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This reminds me of an episode of one of the cartoons I read. Written by a Nuclear Engineering PhD at Berkeley, the strip is quite funny. Here is the one this reminds me of.

    --

    There's no sig like SIGSEG
  18. all we do is play games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being a recent EE grad of the university of illinois, we found as many ways as we could to play games...in one low level programming course all we did was program games--that was a fun way to learn assembly language

  19. What's next? by questamor · · Score: 4, Funny

    What will they think of next?

    Probably clusters of just about any cheap all-identical hardware. It seems to suit the concept of clustering well. Sony have already done all the marketing and hardware price cutting to get the machines out there and used, while subsidising that cost with the games they sell. They'll only get cheaper. On top of that, they're identical systems that'll stay pretty much the same for the next 2-3 years. Good for spares in the future when three of your boxes have worn out, and the pet rat belonging to professor sieslak upstairs has pissed in two.

    Sounds good to me!

    1. Re:What's next? by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      with projects like openmosix identical hardware isn't even necessary! although it only runs on IA-32 with IA-64 coming soon (i think). All that's needed is a bunch of linux systems running an identical kernel.

      --
      I write code.
  20. Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps they got this idea from Slashdot. Then it's easy to predict what they will do with their cluster. They will render a picture of Natali Portman, naked and petrified.

    1. Re:Next step by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      ...with hot grits all over her, no less.

      Sicko. :b

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  21. No performance info... by StandardCell · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...but a group from UIUC says:
    We have also investigated the impact of vector size on performance. The EE processor is tailor-made for 4-element vectors, so one could expect performance degradation for longer vectors. In fact, the opposite is found - a consequence of the pipelining built into the VPU. Performance improvement stops once the vectors reach length 16, consistent with the rather shallow pipelines used in the VPU. In Figure 5, we compare the performance of the PIII-600 and Playstation 2 for 32-element single-precision vector dot products. The absolute performance for smaller datasets now tops 150MFLOPS for both the EE and PIII processors. Curiously, one sees a performance hit on the EE once the dataset exceeds 5 million vectors. This is almost certainly a consequence of the small amount of memory available on the PS2.
    So, I have two question:

    1. What are the performance stats of the cluster in the /. story?

    2. Why would you bother when you could use current commodity hardware for much less? I mean, a P3-600 is interesting, but you could probably drop some Duron 1.4s with a basic mobo and 256MB RAM for less out the door than a PS2. (Note: I'm only asking, please clarify if you have a better idea of what's going on).
    1. Re:No performance info... by SanLouBlues · · Score: 3, Funny

      The real reason for using consoles is that this cluster has a higher resale value, so when the project is done, they can make some of their money back.

    2. Re:No performance info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as pricing goes, refurbished PS2 hardware is going for under $100 shipped

    3. Re:No performance info... by bobbozzo · · Score: 3, Informative
      1. What are the performance stats of the cluster in the /. story?

      320 MFlops on matrix ops. Not great, but they say it's capable of 900 if they can feed the VPU fast enough. They think they can use additional existing hardware in the CPU to increase memory performance.

      2. Why would you bother when you could use current commodity hardware for much less? I mean, a P3-600 is interesting, but you could probably drop some Duron 1.4s with a basic mobo and 256MB RAM for less out the door than a PS2.

      Maybe. Wal-Mart sells Durons (with Lindows) for $199 complete, sans monitor.

      But, apparently PS2's are under $100 according to another poster.

      ISTM that they may be spending a lot of time figuring out how to optimize code for the PS2 though.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    4. Re:No performance info... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      are there size/power/heat considerations between say the PS2 and a pc box?

    5. Re:No performance info... by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      but the linux kit (last i knew) was close to 200. i'm not sure that ebay has enough kits for everyone to go out and buy 10 kits and 10 $100 ps2s to build a cluster...

      --
      I write code.
    6. Re:No performance info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you think. My guess is the National Center for Supercomputing Applications probably has 65 employees who'd like a government funded PS2. :)

    7. Re:No performance info... by Vaystrem · · Score: 1

      "
      1. What are the performance stats of the cluster in the /. story?

      320 MFlops on matrix ops. Not great, but they say it's capable of 900 if they can feed the VPU fast enough. They think they can use additional existing hardware in the CPU to increase memory performance."

      If you re-read the article carefully that is the statistic for each PS2 not for the entire cluster.

    8. Re:No performance info... by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Of course.

      A PS2 certainly uses less power than the _average_ PC. Less power = less heat. Smaller too.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  22. Playstation 2 Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apparantly this runs on Sony's own version of Linux

    See more about it here: http://playstation2-linux.com/

    Maybe an XBox port in the future? :)

  23. Cost Effective by Arc04 · · Score: 1

    Are PS2s more cost effective than other competitors? eg cheap x86 linux boxes.

    Surely Walmart PCs must give more bang for the buck, but are PS2s going to be more stable? What do you guys think??

    Arc

    1. Re:Cost Effective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What part of government grants makes you think this should be cost effective?

      It's free money, and NCSA will do whatever it takes to spend it.

    2. Re:Cost Effective by pickup22 · · Score: 1

      Of course, if I were Sony I would be pratically giving the systems away to get the publicity. Who knows what the NCSA is paying for the units. The only reason to distribute Linux for Playstation is to attract geeks and nerds. This kind of situation gets our attention. How many people who didn't even know about it before having read about it just because of one ./ post?

      --
      God, I wish I could think of a sig!
    3. Re:Cost Effective by waldo2020 · · Score: 1

      the systems are far more stable than an x86 nt shitbox. I have two Sony PS2 with uptimes of nearly a year...

    4. Re:Cost Effective by O · · Score: 0, Troll
      I have two Sony PS2 with uptimes of nearly a year...

      that's kind of weird, man. i appreciate it, though. thanks for posting.
      --

      1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 -- Mathematics is the Language of Nature.
  24. Campaign for beowulf-less people @ Slashdot by drl0gic · · Score: 0, Troll
    Slashdot people: I have good news for you. I know you always want to build a beowulf cluster - and I've found top-secret information on how to make your own! Beowulf cluster Mini-howto Note: the server actually isn't a beowulf cluster, so access it *now* before the server *goes*.

    Dr. L0gic

    Next Story: How to make you beowulf cluster bigger by 2 inches or more

    1. Re:Campaign for beowulf-less people @ Slashdot by croddy · · Score: 1
      haha, the server is in denmark.
      <insert geatse humor here>


      no one will laugh :-(

  25. Re:1 more cluster.....and I'm gonna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think what he wants is really "clusterfuck" without the whitespace. Here ya go:
    Clusterfuck clusterfuck clusterfuck Clusterfuck clusterfuck clusterfuck Clusterfuck clusterfuck clusterfuck CLUSTERFUCK !!
    PS2 cluXtarFux0rz y00, be0tCh !!
    and... drum roll... how about a beowulf CLUSTERFUCK of these !!
    and btw You Misspelled Ludacris.

    !!

  26. I'd like... by nother_nix_hacker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...to see a beawolf cluster of those!...oh..

    1. Re:I'd like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... to see you spell the damn name right when making a STUPID joke that's already been done 10 times in this thread...

      -BeOwUlf

  27. Clusters of... by larry2k · · Score: 1

    What will they think of next?

    I'm still waiting for a cluster of PDAs running Linux.

    --

    The package said "Windows XP or better. Pentium Class Processor or better"... So I got a Mac with OS X

    1. Re:Clusters of... by brain159 · · Score: 1

      Sharp Zaurus SL-5500 units, add CompactFlash WiFi cards (or normal wired ethernet CF NICs and cables, switches etc), and you should in theory be able to do the usual sort of clustering stuff that you do on a desktop linux machine (ok, might need to cross-compile the stuff for it). Alas, the java on the 5500 is understandably somewhat limited so rule out any hopes of doing a nice easy distributed system with java and RMI/CORBA across the devices (eek! I've done all my finals now, I need to let go of the material!).

      Of course, heavy wifi traffic and lots of processing will murder the batteries on the zaurus reasonably promptly :-)

    2. Re:Clusters of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sell honey and nut oat clusters as a cereal, I think. I think one bowl is about as powerful as a TI-85.

    3. Re:Clusters of... by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      though, you could always just keep them in the cradle... i can fit 20 zaurus's in my dekstop case...

      --
      I write code.
    4. Re:Clusters of... by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      like this cluster of Compaq iPaqs?

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  28. Linear price declines, exponetial performance gain by SpikeSpiff · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The issue with using game hardware, especially "older" platforms, is that the price can not come down as fast as overall computing performance can increase.

    This means that the cheapness of stable platforms can not compete with innovative platforms.

    The real question is whether the administration and maintentance benefits of a homogenous and stable platform outweigh the higher cost of processing power.

    I suspect that we will see a step function between rapidly and smoothly improving Dell boxes and occassional huge leaps on game platforms.

    --
    "All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
  29. We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 4, Interesting
    At Nintendo, we've been excited about clustering applications of game consoles as well, and we've pursued a active program of research within our company.

    Internally, we've experimented with large clusters of GameCubes to handle applications such as online games where various game entities in the universe can be logically decomposed into discrete units and processes running on each node of the cluster. This provides a more natural and robust organization to the traditinal setup of a few massive servers, since if one server crashes, it may bring down large parts of the game universe. In our setup, if a node fails, it might affect one NPC at worst, which another node will take over in due time.

    While our investigation has targetted the needs of games in mind, I'm excited about using them for sheer computation, since the cost/MIPS of a game console is far less than traditional mainframe, supercomputing, or even PC platforms, and we are in preliminary talks with some large Japanese universities to experiment with using the GameCube as a compute unit.

    While I must admit I'm sort of biased :-), we believe that our GameCube makes a superior clustering platform compared to the PS2, computationally (higher CPU speed), physically (its smaller size and form factor, less heat dissapation) and financially (lower unit cost).

    Our future game consoles will likely support clustering "out of the box", with expansion as easy as hooking them together, allowing games, such as FPSes, or AI-heavy games like the Sim* series, to seamlessly evolve with the greater "virtual" CPU and memory resources that a cluster provides.

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    1. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll.

      Doesn't really work at Nintendo.

    2. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by virtigex · · Score: 1
      The key thing with the PS2 is that Sony provides a Linux implementation, enabling one to run the huge library of open source code. They also provide APIs for some game specific functions.

      Would Nintendo do the same? Any edge in performance would be negated by any restrictions associated with proprietary software. On the other hand, I'm sure that the open source community would greatly welcome either a Linux implementation (or documentation enabling an implementation) on the GameCube.

    3. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by pickup22 · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine the day when you need two consoles to play a game "fully"? That would be the console makers wet dream. Wait till XBox sales division reads that idea - I'm sure Gates would approve;.

      --
      God, I wish I could think of a sig!
    4. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by waldo2020 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      hey Mr. PHD, sure the clock rate is higher on your PPC, but where are your vector units?? Streams benchmark shows PS2 sucks vs a PC, but it's the vector units that shine. good luck duplicting a toshiba custom vlsi Emotion Engine with the hardware you've got on a Cube. No way to add a hard drive, no way to read an ISO disk or DVD... no built in LAN - how did you say your Cube was better suited to clusters?

    5. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he is a troll and does not work there it sure has posted alot to slashdot, bothered to fill it his about him info.

    6. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by shepd · · Score: 1

      >While I must admit I'm sort of biased :-), we believe that our GameCube makes a superior clustering platform compared to the PS2, computationally (higher CPU speed), physically (its smaller size and form factor, less heat dissapation) and financially (lower unit cost).

      Lower unit cost, eh?

      For who? You or the buyer?

      My bets are on the buyer, 'cause I'm still pretty sure the proprietary drive and decent graphics/cpu inside those boxes are losing you money per sale at current prices.

      If any clustering abilities were found for the GC and were made public, I think the reaction from Nintendo would be even more negative than the MANY other times Nintendo has sued other companies for releasing compatible ideas/hardware to improve Nintendo's consoles (remember Camerica and Tengen, anyone?)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now put them online and distribute the load around the world.

    8. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I have to ask: Does it run Linux?

    9. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by juuri · · Score: 1

      Read the posting history and do a google search.

      This isn't a real guy, unless he used to work at sega doing the same such thing (as he claims further back in his posts). Funny, he would have been in the US (from what he writes) while working for sega. Unfortunately sega never had a department by the name he claimed to be head of.

      Now he reads and replies to articles at slashdot? Yeah.

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    10. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Mr.Gupta, just in case you are real. Following questions arise to that logic.

      Nintendo hasn't been really known as a company of openess regarding their platforms, how are you going to deal with the problems of serving a computational clustering solution heavily depends on openening the system to know operating systems and the average joe programmer.

      B I wonder how you really wan't to deal with the costs of adding the additionally required components like a HD and a decent open ethernet interface, given the fact that consoles are only stripped down computers, adding those components would push your console into PC regions pricewise. Also add the fact that for such clusters there is no after game market so you can't sell the console with a loss.

      I'm not sure if clustering consoles is the way to go.

    11. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not when they loose money on every console (more like their nightmare) also they make the money on software, so they'd only sell one piece of software for every 2 consoles, meaning they make less money...

    12. Re:We've investigated GameCube clusters too. by zonker · · Score: 0

      hate to mention this, but the cube does have ports on the bottom of the unit fully capable of sporting a hard disk. it also has both a modem and lan port on the bottom as well, sold separately, just like the ps2. i suppose you could prolly rig a dvd or cdrom up to it too using the above mentioned port, but it would be a bit of a kludge as it would have to be a separate unit or on the bottom...

  30. Also worth considering: the Xbox by mkro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A Xbox is cheaper than the PS2 (An Xbox is about $150, according to OSDN Pricewatch), comes with twice the amount of memory, ethernet, and instead of buying a $200 Linux kit, you pick up a flashable, legal* mod chip for $25-$50. How the Emotion Engine compares to the Xbox P733 I have no idea, but I can't imagine the EE is that much faster.
    Both The Xbox-Linux Project and Gentoox can provide you with a distro. For free.

    Even if you're not planning a cluster, this is a good deal for a low-performance work station, or just a "media box", using Xbox Media Player, which plays most (all?) popular media formats, both music and video.

    It's been repeated countles times that Microsoft are losing money on the console itself, and depend on the games to cover their expenses. Therefore, paying up for a Xbox and giving your money to MS isn't immoral as long as you don't buy any games.

    See, it's a win-win situation :)

    * I lost track of the current situation in the U.S., but in the free world (Read: Europe) at least the chips not using MS code is legal.

    --
    I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    1. Re:Also worth considering: the Xbox by mkro · · Score: 1

      Oh, cool. When I read my own writeup, I notice the Slashdot banner ad is divided into four parts; Two English and one Norwegian selling Xbox consoles, and one selling mod chips :) ..and when I pressed "Preview" in this writeup, the banners changed to Nintendo ads when I added the word "console". Oh, the wonders of modern technology :)

      "It must be legal, I saw it in a Slashdot banner ad."

      --
      I shall go and tell the indestructible man that someone plans to murder him.
    2. Re:Also worth considering: the Xbox by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      It's illegal to put linux on an Xbox. Why would somebody risk a lawsuit or god forbid a jail sentence to make a cluster?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    3. Re:Also worth considering: the Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're fucking joking, right? A XBox??? The cpu in an XBox is pathetic.

    4. Re:Also worth considering: the Xbox by damiam · · Score: 1

      It's a 700+ Mhz Celeron, which is better than whatever the PS2 has (except maybe for the highly vectorized stuff that the Emotion Engine excels at).

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:Also worth considering: the Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone already did built and Xbox linux cluster here

    6. Re:Also worth considering: the Xbox by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      This, you see, is the point - they were using the VU's !!!

      The PS2 has 2 vector units (VU's), each does a 4-way (xyzw) floating point vector dot product with another vector in a single clock cycle, with 4 cycle internal latency. The chips are pipelined, so you can just keep feeding any 4-cycle instructions into it (90-odd% are 4-cycle, matrix deconvolution will take it more :-) and you get the answers 4 clocks later...

      That's 8x2 (16 :-) float multiply ops per clock, at 300 MHz if you keep the pipeline going. The performance of a 700MHz Celeron doesn't even come close, it's roughly 1/8th the speed...

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    7. Re:Also worth considering: the Xbox by Hast · · Score: 1

      Yes, the PS2 has vector units. So does the XBox.

      Just what was it you though that the graphics card was? Besides the XBox has a more "PC" interface which would make it easier to port to.

      I bet that it won't take very long until we start seeing these types of applications running on XBox hardware. You could even run it on your graphics card on your PC. As long as you can read the memory from the graphics card. (Not sure which cards actually support this.)

    8. Re:Also worth considering: the Xbox by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The vector units on the PS2 are far and away more powerful than the graphics card on the XBox. They're fully general-purpose vector processors, not a graphics chip co-pro. I *do* know a little about this topic - I've written a VU simulator...

      Go to the Sony PS2 demo section on the PS2 linux site, and look at the VU demos there - or at least read about them. There are examples of marionette models being manipulated in response to the user input (x,y,z,buttons for impulses, etc.) on the controller. The physics is correct. The entire program runs on VU1...

      These aren't graphics pipelines with programmable filters (Cg, for example), they're general-purpose CPU's with float and integer registers, maths operations (obviously), local single-cycle RAM (for programs and data), dma channels, interrupts, the works.

      I'll start to take note of the Xbox graphics when you can download programs to it, tell it to execute them (until an event happens), register inbound/outbound dma data-transfers so it doesn't run out of data, and then let the main CPU get on with doing its own stuff. What's that, you say ? It can't ? Oh well. Shame.

      The PS2 was an experiment in a new computing architecture - one that almost cost it dearly, since it's a pain in the *rse to program if you don't adapt to its' strengths rather than force it to use your own. It's a dataflow architecture - you download programs to the CPUs, then stream the data (vertices, colours, textures, etc.) through the programs from RAM using DMA and onto the graphics rasteriser.

      The thinking is that most transformation programs can be expressed relatively succinctly, and that there's always more data than program anyway, so your algorithm for the bubbling ripple effect is (say) 6k, with (say) 2M of vertex,texture,lookup, etc. You feed in the same (initial conditions) data every frame, and a time clock, letting the VU program calculate the vertex manipulations... Because the data is always going to be much larger than the code, the overhead in switching VU programs during a frame is negligible, so do it whenever you need to...

      When you think of the problem that the PS2 engineers were trying to solve, the architecture is very neat & very elegant ... The PS2 has (for its' time) enormous bandwidth between on-chip modules, local cache RAM on all the processors, a general-purpose MIPS chip to keep things ticking over (run this one, wait,... run this one, wait...), and the VU's to do the heavy lifting from frame to frame.

      In fairness, the more recent PC cards are almost getting there - Cg2 will be better (it'll have loops!) I think the maximum program length is currently 128 instructions as well . Whoosh. But at least it's getting better.

      To try and compare the two is laughable at best. Yes, they both produce similar games, but they do it very differently under the hood, and this thread was about using the VU's in a cluster to form a supercomputer, after all... (I think that's misguided, myself, even using BSP you'd be hard pressed to cope with the latencies involved, but that's another story!)

      Simon

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    9. Re:Also worth considering: the Xbox by Hast · · Score: 1

      First off I'd like to give you a tip to look at GPGPU which is a site which has references to a lot of papers using graphics hardware for general purpose calculations. (I found it in another part of this topic.)

      And yes, it's true that the vector processors in a PS2 are more flexible than what is found in an XBox or on a standard graphics card for a PC. And of those two the XBox has the benefit of UMA.

      Still, it's an interesting way of modern hacking on a similar level as using the C64 floppy drive as an additional processor.

  31. What a tough question.. by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "What will they think of next?"

    How about a useful problem to solve?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  32. Riiiiiight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    scientific computing on the Sony Playstation 2. They've set up a cluster with 65 compute nodes.

    Who thinks that these 65 playstations are really being used for GTA3 & playing other games?

    It's research, dammit!

  33. It's the trend of the future by Ryu2 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Since 3-D graphics essentially is comprised manupulating vectors very quickly, the Graphics processors found not only in the PS2, but the latest PC graphics cards are now essentially very fast stream-based vector processors, and can be readily harnessed for general-purpose scientific computation other than graphics: particle, cloth, fluid simulations. The GPU replaces the CPU for computation, and texture or other video memory, with its much higher bandwidth and lower latency than system ram, is used as a backing store for data.

    A lot of the GDC and SIGGRAPH 2003 papers focus not on graphics directly, but on scientific computations using the CPU. It's very cool, and if nVidia and ATI the like ever want to expand into a new market, they should build cards with multiple GPUs each, and sell them to the scientific community, or to non-realtime CG places like Pixar to accelerate their offline rendering.

    This page has a good summary of the current research going on to make GPUs do stuff other than graphics. http://wwwx.cs.unc.edu/~harrism/gpgpu/index.shtml

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:It's the trend of the future by afidel · · Score: 4, Informative

      The big problem with using PC graphics cards is that the memory bandwidth on the AGP bus leading back to the system is abysmal. I know several groups looked into this when the Geforce 3 came out and suddenly we had a high speed low cost programmable vector processor, the result was that unless your application could return relativly small datasets you weren't going to get much performance out of them. I think a PS2 would be similarly hampered by the small amount of ram available, not many interesting datasets would fit in it.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:It's the trend of the future by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you find 170MB/s abysmal....

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
  34. Still a waste by nobodyman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The hardware costs are negligible whether NCSA paid for the units or not. I doubt Sony paid the salaries of the people working on this -- and this is where the real money is spent. I'm all for people working on projects like this even if it's for no better reason than to see if it can be done. But when my tax dollars are involved, and we are in an economic downturn, and the nation and many states are facing huge budget deficits, my hacker ethic gives way to my pissed-off-taxpayer ethic.

    Really, there is no tangible scientific benefit to doing this, so I don't know why they bothered. The only leg they have to stand on is if they argued they were trying to see if a terrorist-friendly nation could build a supercomputer out of toys, but we know this is true already so I still don't like it. If they wan't to play around, they can do it on somebody elses dime... not mine.

    1. Re:Still a waste by nexex · · Score: 1

      didn't you hear, the downturn is offically over today!

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
    2. Re:Still a waste by Dop · · Score: 1

      Not a waste. Read this: Pablo Project

      It explains that one of the main purposes of the PS2 cluster is to develop software for parallel computing and gain insight that may improve future game console technology. PS2s seem like pretty cheap hardware to do the development on (especially if they were donated by Sony.)

      Sony learns more about their hardware and the research community gets software out of it. I can think of a lot worse ways to spend tax dollars.

    3. Re:Still a waste by princeofweasels · · Score: 1

      Yeah... damn it couldn't they have just gone out and bought the mega flops from IBM or leased them. I'm sure that would have been cheaper. As for not paying your salaries, your absolutely right let's cut some more jobs. That will turn up the heat on the economy. And your right on the money with the scientific benefit too. They should just wait until Microsoft comes out with longhorn. Then I'm sure they'll be able to do all the dot products they want.

    4. Re:Still a waste by nobodyman · · Score: 1

      Your point is.... what exactly? That it's a worthwhile adventure to have my taxes to go towards a team of Phd's futzing around with 65 ps2 boot cd's? That they should be employed for the sake of being employed?

      Look... keep the NCSA. Just spend the money on something worthwhile. After clustering 65 ps2's the only thing you've learned is that the NCSA must have way more spare time than they know what to do with.

      At the very least please tell me that grad students were working on this or something.

    5. Re:Still a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For real, they're finding a cheap way to crunch their numbers and the numbers need crunching. I had the same initial reaction that it was pointless, but then I read about the project, and I say it's damned cool that they're doing something useful with it.

    6. Re:Still a waste by tarzan353 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...and you're completely off base. There is a distinct scientific benefit of doing this. The VPU is fast as hell for how cheap the hardware is.

      They aren't just "playing around"... this project initially was being directly used by the chemistry department in scientific computing. Only after word got around a little bit did more people start looking into how best to exploit the PS2's power for research.

    7. Re:Still a waste by zeno_2 · · Score: 1
      Sony learns more about their hardware and the research community gets software out of it. I can think of a lot worse ways to spend tax dollars.

      Yea, theres always somethin good about paying taxes to benefit a foriegn company.

    8. Re:Still a waste by grue23 · · Score: 1

      The whole point of exercises like this is to see if they can get more bang for their buck, which in turn will hopefully save taxpayer money.

      It may be posted to /. because it's nifty, but that's not why the money is being spent on the project.

      You also seem to imply that all government research should be directed towards modelling what other governments can do, which is asinine. Maybe you just think that that's the only legitimate reason to do research like this, which isn't all too bright either.

    9. Re:Still a waste by rawgod0122 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bull Shit. Doing science (be it playing with chemicals or computers) just for the sake of doing science is what has given us MANY of our most useful tools. Penicillin and Lasers were discovered because some scientist was messing around with something and said "Wait, why is that happening?". We also get things that are just part of the journey to destination. This would include things like Velcro.

      Besides that what is so wrong about people trying to do things cheaper? More reliable? Because they are interested in them?

      If they can make this go as fast as (or close) the theory says, this would be a pretty good platform. Keep in mind that we will be seeing clustering of different types of systems for a long time to come. The more research we do the better we will be at it. In the end it will allow us to be more efficent.

    10. Re:Still a waste by Jungle+guy · · Score: 1
      As a non-american, I think your tax dollars were well-spent, and I wished my country had the inteligence to fund such a project. As strange as it may seems, a cluster of PS 2 is not something trivial, as it uses a processor with two vektor processing units. The japanese made their bet on vektor processors, and it seemed they had lost the race for building supercomputers for the americans, which were building big clusters with scalar processors.

      In 2001, however, the japanese government rolled out the Earth Simulator, a cluster of 5120 vektor processors. It is 5 times faster than IBM ASCI White, the former fastest computer on earth. Know how to cluster vektor processors might be important in the future for really high performance compputing.

  35. dude, that was HILARIOUS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no one has ever posted a comment like that to a story actually involving clusters! how witty!

    1. Re:dude, that was HILARIOUS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He ment Xbox's dude..why replying if you are to dumb to fill in the empty space, are you on drugs?

  36. Re:1 more cluster.....and I'm gonna by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    Our university has this deal called "cluster hires." I guess the game is that you have to hire several people in different departments, all at once, and these people are all supposed to interact with each other in some kind of collaboration kind of deal (like hiring a materials person, a condensed-matter physicist, a EE -- they are all supposed to be working together to try to turn our Midwestern U into Silicon Cow Pasture). It is the latest administration sca^H^H^Hconcept and we are all supposed to bend our hiring around it, and since we are understaffed we will jump through any hoops to get bodies into classrooms, but all I can think of is the CF word, because a cluster hire is one big CF.

    Please excuse my ignorance on the CF word. I think I kinda know what it means. I think a cluster hire is a CF if you understand all the implications of it. But what really is a CF? Is it what my parents used to call (derisively) a "three-ring circus"? Is there a rigorous definition, etymology, or example usage? I want to call something a CF and use the term correctly.

  37. This seems like a really good idea by coupland · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After all, everyone knows that console hardware is sold for a fairly significant loss, all the profit is in the licensing of titles. One on its own isn't much to sneeze at, but a cluser of 64? You get a fairly powerful cluster and Sony subsidizes your super-computer. Smart idea...

  38. Already parodied! by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    Nukees strip on clustered PS2's.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  39. New Ask Slashdot question by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    At Nintendo, we've been excited about clustering applications of game consoles as well, and we've pursued a active program of research within our company.
    [snip!]
    Samir Gupta, Ph.D
    Head, New Technology Research Department
    Nintendo Co Ltd. Kyoto, Japan

    What I want to know is, how much resume spam do you get, now that you post on slashdot, saying(or perhaps claiming) you work for Nintendo's R&D? :-)

    1. Re:New Ask Slashdot question by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1
      You were right to be suspicious of his alleged credentials. For example, check out this previous post:

      "At Nintendo, we've done a lot of research into uses of Nintendo consoles other than gaming, such as using it as a inexpensive terminal for Internet access, or more compellingly, education, and we have done preliminary work with various Laotian and others governmental bodies and NGOs to make games such as Super Marx Brothers and The Legend of Kaysone Phomvihan to teach Laotian youth in new and engaging dynamic ways." --article here

      And a google search reveals nobody by that name with any connection to Nintendo from any site except Slashdot. Think about it.

      Every single post by this guy (or girl) is trolling on his alleged position with Nintendo. Don't fall for it.

  40. Re:1 more cluster.....and I'm gonna by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1
    --
    Why not fork?
  41. port a un*x you asses by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    Port a BSD for God's sake. Or strike a deal with qnx or something. Maybe even "Inferno" from Plan 9. If not, just stop posting to slashdot! We don't need your stinkin hardware if Nintendo is gonna cross her legs and refuse to let GameCube cherry be popped!

  42. Asses at N'sGameCube division by screwthemoderators · · Score: 1

    It just occurred to me how many asses might read /. and think it applies to them. No! GameCube's code is sealed tighter than a drum- dooming it to obsolescence

    1. Re:Asses at N'sGameCube division by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just like a macintosh, right? troll.

  43. distributed Paystations by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 1

    maybe some smart person (s) could get their head (s) together and find a way to make all 200 million playstations ever made work on some crazy problem like random mathmatical numbers occuring in natural rainfall. Another good projuect is to see if all that power might reverse the earth electric field. It would be interesting. Also here is to 1seconddelay getting slashdotted. I am he and i am here and nobody stops me. love 1seconddelay.

  44. Timex Sinclair Clusters by leejor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reminds me of a nut case I met at a garage sale some 10 years ago. He was scavenging ZX80 Timex Sinclair in a effort to prove that clustered computing built around very cheap systems was the wave of the future.

    I also complained about how he had been an EE for IBM who was not appreciated for his genius. He was very worried that once he released his ZX80 FrankenCluster, IBM would steal it from him due to his old employment contract.

    Lee Joramo

    1. Re:Timex Sinclair Clusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just goes to show you that nothing is truly original. Interesting.

    2. Re:Timex Sinclair Clusters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Someone does this in William Gibson's "Pattern Recognition" as an art project, using Timex Sinclairs (or whatever the British equivalent was called).

    3. Re:Timex Sinclair Clusters by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      If he was a nut case, was this a Nut Cluster? Just wondering...

  45. Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I wonder if it's located in CSL. If so, I could walk over there right now and "benchmark" with a couple of games... er "programs"

    I need to go see this thing since I actually go to school at UIUC.

  46. This is bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've seen it over and over. General purpose hardware being used for specialised tasks. Yes it works ok and it's cheap, but so what? Video card GPUs can do this too, but you've only got on AGP slot. Refine it and go faster.

    What do you need? How about rack full of Custom PCBs each with a GF-FX or similar, with some RAM and a PCI-X backplane. The host can run a regular fast cpu and provide the interface. I'm sure Nvidia would jump at the chance to power a supercomputer with their chips.

  47. Xbox Port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not a chance. Playstation 2 linux is designed for the MIPS architecture; the Xbox has a good old-fashioned x86 under the hood.

    Also, Sony's linux distribution for the PS2 is based on a 2.2.1 kernel (old old old!), XFree 3.3.6 (again, quite old), gcc 2.95 (somewhat out of date, though plenty of systems still use it). The FAQ here says that the software is only slightly more recent than the software included with Redhat 6.2.

    In short, there's nothing worth porting when you can get all of the Debian goodness for so much less work. I personally don't know why I'd want to shell out that kind of money for some second-rate hardware and a profoundly old linux distro with the price of commodity hardware being as low as it is these days.

    Or were you just kidding?

    1. Re:Xbox Port by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Of course one can get a more recent Debian based distro for the PS2, BlackRhino. But really, the main reason is to do developement and make your own games.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  48. You don't exist by shepd · · Score: 4, Informative

    At least not on the internet.

    Nein for google.

    One EXTREMELY LAME hit from deja. Surprisingly, the sig is identical.

    Until you show some credentials (as in a link to nintendo's site, with a page with AT LEAST your name on it), you don't exist.

    In fact, it appears your department doesn't exist.

    Heck, where's your thesis, at least?

    I find it neat, though, that you went from being Head of New Technology Research at SEGA straight to being Head of New Technology Research at Nintendo. More amazing, though, is that both companies have exactly the same departments!

    More interesting:

    <sgupta@research.sega.jp>:
    Sorry, I couldn't find any host named research.sega.jp. (#5.1.2)

    Look, provide me a page at nintendo.co.jp with your name on it, and everything will be sorted out.

    Otherwise, this is:

    Bill Gates,
    Microsoft Founder
    Redmond

    Signing off.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  49. Can anyone track the first beowulf cluster joke? by 3770 · · Score: 1

    For one, it would be fun to know. Secondly, we know the name of the guy to blame everytime we see that lame joke.

    Maybe we will feel better if we can spam the original joker every time we see a beowulf joke.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
  50. Re:1 more cluster.....and I'm gonna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IC, so according to that Wikipedia definition the US vs "Weapons of mass destruction" / IRAQ, was basically one big-ass Cluster Fuck. The only thing is. Those sick fucking americans seemed to enjoy it. Retards. GNU/RMS/GPL is also another timeless classic version of the Cluster Fuck. this one will go down in history as the worlds greatest Cluster Fuck. I guess people are too ignorant to catch on or something.

    Open Source, GNU, GPL, RMS. "Free Software Foundation". It's all one big ugly Cluster Fuck, from which no-one will benefit. You'll see.
    unless of course something drastic happens to change the way of the future by some important dude taking there own head out of there ass.

  51. Move on! by DasAlbatross · · Score: 1

    One day people are going to realize that the fact that something computes does not mean you have to put Linux on it. That day the combined brain power released will result in a cure for pretty much everything you can think of.

    1. Re:Move on! by NedTheNerd · · Score: 1

      yea why dont the use a real operating system like windows XP oh wait thats right they dont make XP for the ps2 aw darn I guess I am just stupid

    2. Re:Move on! by tarzan353 · · Score: 2, Informative

      How else do you propose that people run arbitrary scientific programs on the PS2? Right now Linux is the only solution, nobody saying it's the end-all be-all of computing.

  52. yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it run linux? oh wait.

  53. Re:Can anyone track the first beowulf cluster joke by billstr78 · · Score: 1

    I do remember the story that started it. There was a post almost a year ago on someone building a beowulf cluster of Apple IIe's (yes I am too lazy to search for it {/. search engn. sux}).

    Every hardware story that came out after it contained at least one comment about.. "Man Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of X". I guess the idea was that a cluster of Apple IIe's was so absurd, why not a cluster of Microwaves (with microprocessors) or a cluster of iPaq's (it exists) or a cluster of ______ fill in the blank.

  54. Oh boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    65 nodes and it's still got jaggies!!

    1. Re:Oh boy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah makes you wonder if it will be fast enough to finally do full antialiasing... prolly not. sony wastes too many cycles on highly realistic tentacle rape animation (like ms on bouncy boobies) to bother with FAA...

  55. Re:Who cares by tarzan353 · · Score: 1

    You know, the AC is right on this one. The only Linux you can get for PS2 is a Japanese version, which does suck for non-Japanese. You have to use a strange keyboard.

  56. That's not true - I use an English kit by Mongoose · · Score: 1

    I speak and read a little japanese, but it's not needed to use the US PS2 kit -- it's in english.

    Also you can even get a debain distrobution for it now. Stop talking about things you never seen or even read about. =)

    http://blackrhino.xrhino.com/

    1. Re:That's not true - I use an English kit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also you can even get a debain distrobution for it now.

      At least you proved the strange keyboard point.
  57. Sony interested in this project for many reasons? by GeekTek · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Sony encouraged this setup to learn clustering techniques utilizing every inch of their hardware for the upcoming PS3 "cell" boxen? They're under pressure to release the console before its original time (2005-6 now 2004?), so maybe they're squeezing performance out any way they can. I seem to remember there being rumblings of distributed computing, could this benefit that? Regardless, I'm sure they're watching closely.

    Just a thought. I'm not an engineer so please don't bother flaming if its not a realistic idea :)

  58. Obligatory gag by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...imagine a beowulf cluster of these....

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  59. How does that compare to SSE/SSE2? by phr2 · · Score: 1

    A bare bones Pentium 3 or Athlon box doesn't cost that much more than a PS2 and runs at maybe 1.5 ghz. I think it can do an SSE2 operation (like a 4 point MAC) in 2 cycles, or is it 1 cycle? Since the clock speed is 5x the PS2, the overall throughput should be at least as fast and maybe a lot faster.

    1. Re:How does that compare to SSE/SSE2? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the US you can get a 1.5GHz machine for $200, over here in the UK, a minimal machine (cheapest 1.5GHz I could find flicking through Computer shopper) is 440 pounds ($660), including taxes. A PS2 is 149 pounds ($225).

      You don't get SSE2 on Celerons or Athlons, as far as I know (you might get it on Celerons, but only the new Barton core from AMD does SSE2, and that's only on 3GHz+ machines, I think). My 1.5GHz machine above only has SSE/3dNow anyway.

      According to (http://www.tommesani.com/MMXExamples.html), if I'm reading correctly, it takes 8 MMX instructions to do an 8-point (2x4-way) dot product. On the PS2, it would take 2 clocks on a single VU, or 1 clock if the algorithm was using both VU's... [No you wouldn't interleave dot-products across VU's, I'm talking about if you set both VU's running on the same problem, and divided the data by 2, half each]

      Still pretty convincing, for 3-year-old technology...

      When Sony bring out the PS3, I was wondering if they might even take this a stage further. If you were to put an FPGA into a console, you could actually have programmable hardware at your disposal... *That* would be cool :-))

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
  60. Still waiting by SRCR · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for the GBA rendering farm...

    --
  61. Isn't that what all the Cell rumours are about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your TV will have a Cell chip, your Playstation will, and so on, and the more you have, the better your experience, I've read. It seems impossible to sell, to me, but that's what people are writing.

  62. Can you boot a PS2 into Linux off a memory card? by ikekrull · · Score: 1

    I would have thought you could avoid the need for the HDD etc. if you could boot a miniaml linux distro off an 8MB memory card, and use the CPU power of the EE along with NAS for data storage.

    Is this possible?

    --
    I gots ta ding a ding dang my dang a long ling long
  63. 10baseT? by echomadman · · Score: 1

    Why not use the iLink porton the PS2s instead of the linux kit Ethernet card and get 400Mbs instead of 100Mbs

    --
    "he's full of get up and go" "really?, he fills me with lie down and die."
    1. Re:10baseT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how many nodes will that allow you to connect together?

      One problem I notice with this cluster is that it relies on interconnecting 2 switches, this is finr for 65 nodes, but if you want to scale up much larger you start to run into problems with there being too much data flowing between the switches. Also the latency of 100 meg ethernet is going to cause a major loss of performance (and more importantly latency) in comparison to clusters based on gig ether or dedicated cluster interconnects like myrinet and quadrics.

  64. Sync On Green? by bluethundr · · Score: 1

    I've been wanting to get the Linux for PS2 package for a while now. But, the main reason I would want to, as I have a number of Linux boxes already, is to have Linux running on a shcweet HDTV I'm looking to buy. But, the Linux kit for PS2 only does sync on green and I don't know if regular/hdtvs usually do sync on green or sync on rgb. I'm loth to spend the $200 if the only way to run it is with a computer monitor...

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    1. Re:Sync On Green? by ctid · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the efficacy of the method, but apparently you can get away without a sync-on-green monitor. Good luck.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    2. Re:Sync On Green? by nimpo · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem, when I installed linux I did it at work using an SGI monitor (can't remember which model). However, I found a VGA adapter in HMV music and video/videogames store for 25 pounds (sterling) called "Blaze VGA Adaptor for Playstation(R)2" (google it, as I can't get the web page [www.xploder.net] to work!). It works well and you only need the hardware that it comes with (the software is for attempting to get normal games working on VGA. I haven't tried it with games as my PS2 is on the Net pretty much all the time (http://frik.mvc.mcc.ac.uk/).

  65. playstation2-linux site with Mozilla by silvaran · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some people might need to use SSL while connecting to the playstation2-linux site, or you'll get a blank page:

    https://playstation2-linux.com

    1. Re:playstation2-linux site with Mozilla by fatgraham · · Score: 1

      You need 128bit encryption iirc (ie too)

  66. re: What will they think of next? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

    Massive XBox cluster, subsidized by Microsoft

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  67. Re:Can anyone track the first beowulf cluster joke by Hast · · Score: 1

    The "imagine a Beuwulf cluster of this" is quite a bit older than a year. The first case I found after a short amount of Googling was WYSE uses Linux for thin clients from 99-06-14. I'm sure even earlier can be found, but it was getting a bit old (har har) to look through search results. I bet you could do it quickly if you made a script for it though. (For quite a while the URL contain the date, so you'd only have to track that.)

    Could even do it to build a "Beowulf cluster of these" database. ;-)

  68. Even better :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they'd done this with a Dreamcast it would have been even cheaper, plus they'd be able to run a 2.4 kernel and not just that crufty old 2.2 job that's in the PS/2 Linux kit. And before any of yahs start whining on about the matter of a lack of disks, yer wrong. We've got a filesystem driver for the DC's VMU so we could store all of 128kb of data :-> (see this for more details.).

    Seriously, I know a lot of you like to laugh at console developers but we're hacking away at high powered boxes.

  69. why didnt they use this by paradesign · · Score: 1

    the gscube? sounds like what they wanted, plus a ton smaller. see it here

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  70. agreed. by 0x12d3 · · Score: 1

    As of today on pricewatch one could purchase a complete duron 1.3 ghz system (no os) for $211. This is a very sweet price-point @ 6.16MHz/dollar. I'm sure they could do even better purchasing in bulk (probably opting for a non-End Of Life chip).

  71. Um. by Niet3sche · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Iraq did this in the summer of 2000 - they were using the PS2 (on pre-order, IIRC) and its graphics engine for -surprise!- missile guidance and telemetry.

    Old news. New company. Same story, really.

  72. Our university has this deal called "cluster hire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    easy to do ....when you are spending taxpayer's money.

    Social engineering BS should be where BS belongs...in the sludge factory

  73. OMG look what you did by nacs · · Score: 1

    You know that would probably have got modded up +5 funny if you had spelled Natalie Portman's name correctly.

    --
    "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
  74. What about the sheer amount of video ram on cards? by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    The newest ati's and nvidia's seem to have 256 MB of video ram which is 4x that of the ps2's complete ram. The speed of this ram is close to 10x faster then pc 2700 (currently the mainstream ddr333) as Nvidia indicates their ram moves 27 gig's of data per second. Also the new intel sprindale or whatever chipsets support 800 mhz fsb and dual channel ddr400. Compared to the ddr 266's availble then this is almost a 3x increase in overal system memory bandwidth... coupled with agp 8x we have at least 3x to 4x more memory band compared to the geforce3 era.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  75. Re:What about the sheer amount of video ram on car by afidel · · Score: 1

    No, the point is that sending data from the video card to main memory is extremely slow. The video bandwidth is fast, as is the bandwidth TO the video card, but the bandwidth FROM the video card to main memory is almost non-existant, this is true even for AGP 8X as it is an extremely asymetric bus. From what I remember the bandwidth from the card to main memory on AGP 4X is actually slower than PCI 32bit 33Mhz.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  76. You only need 1 linux kit by Vince · · Score: 1

    You just need the Boot CD that comes with the Linux Kit, and maybe a memory card for each PS2. Then you can boot each of the CD (one at a time), and they can run, mounting the root partition over NFS, fine until the next re-boot.

  77. wow.... by Pharmboy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just imagine a beowolf of these! oh, wait.......

    (dont blame me, you KNEW someone would do a beowolf joke....)

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  78. Good platform for media encoding? by phr2 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the divx video or Vorbis audio encoders could be ported to the PS2. They are heavy number crunching, cpu hungry programs. Oggenc runs faster than real time on a fast pc, but nowhere near as fast as a fast CD ripping drive. I don't think divx can run in real time even on the fastest pc's. A cluster of ps2's may be a cheap way to do a lot of cd-to-vorbis ripping or DVD to divx conversions in a hurry!

  79. Not the GRAPHICS, the GRAPHICS ENGINE by billstewart · · Score: 1
    They're not using it's ability to handle graphics - they're not running graphics on the thing.

    What they're doing is using the vector processor parts of Emotion Engine, which is the graphics processor chip, as a number-cruncher, but not actually using it to drive the graphics functions. And they're using the CPU to do I/O and networking and feed stuff to the Emotion Engine.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks