Slashdot Mirror


Aimee Deep Interview

LawGeek writes "Aimee Deep is probably most famously known as the highly attractive cover-girl of Madster (formerly known as Aimster). Since being involved with Madster (her father's business), she has had the opportunity to become more interested in legal and business issues surrounding the music distribution business and now blogs on the subject. Greplaw editor Mikael Pawlo recently interviewed the 18-year old Ms. Deep on various topics."

412 comments

  1. More Aimee Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:More Aimee Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I love you. No really, I mean it. You are doing a public service to the Slashdot community.

    2. Re:More Aimee Pictures by leandrod · · Score: 1

      Only one is good, the rest is crap.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    3. Re:More Aimee Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of God, mod parent down!

    4. Re:More Aimee Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New +10 Modifier to the first nekkid pictures.

    5. Re:More Aimee Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, what I'd pay good money for is to see how that hardware around her waist (in the first link in the article) is terminated.

    6. Re:More Aimee Pictures by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 1

      That is a pretty good shot. In the rest, it seems like the photographer is accentuating the whole breasts thing at the expense of the rest of the photo. A good photographer would completely ignore what everyone else goes for (read: bikini, v-cut shirts, etc.) and make her look more like a person than a sex object. Well, good by my standards, anyway.

      Just look at what Ansel Adams did. His stuff is stunningly beautiful and he didn't do a single thing that mainstream photographers of the day did.

      Now, back on topic!

      She didn't quite answer some of the questions in the interview, so to me, she comes off as a bit ditzy. She didn't answer the question about Lessig at all! I could be completely wrong, but based solely on that interview, it doesn't seem like she really understands some of the stuff that she was talking about. Of course, she IS still in high school, so her comprehension seems to be quite a bit above average for her age group. I think that I'll read some of her writings when I get some free time. Perhaps then I will have a better opinion.

    7. Re:More Aimee Pictures by Uart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow -- so, basically all of the boobies have left FARK and ended up here...

      excellent.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    8. Re:More Aimee Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Jesus Christ! I would so Deep her...

      I'm typing this with one hand.

    9. Re:More Aimee Pictures by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Nice guns.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    10. Re:More Aimee Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These pictures were all taken when "Aimee" was age 16 - with her father's consent & blessing, as he was at the shoot.

    11. Re:More Aimee Pictures by Cmdr.+Taco+SuxDix · · Score: 0

      I'd hit it.

      --
      O> ( \ X 8===D
  2. Uh oh by cscx · · Score: 4, Funny

    You post something like this on Slashdot? I hear the wrists flailing away as a rush of furious masturbation is about to begin...

    1. Re:Uh oh by doormat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yea, I figure thats why we have so few responces for this sub in the first minutes of posting.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    2. Re:Uh oh by hitzroth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about the sound of thousands of eyes rolling at the parroted cyber-libertarian cliches? Yeah, she's "only" 18, but couldn't she come up with something creative, or at least interesting to say? Whoops, I forgot, perky boobs in a camo bikini let one get away with shit like that. I apologize for the interuption, let the fapping continue.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    3. Re:Uh oh by l810c · · Score: 4, Funny
      Yea, I figure thats why we have so few responces for this sub in the first minutes of posting.

      Wwwweeeellll, Iii wwwaassss tttrryyyiiinngg ttoo ppoossst, bbuutt allll mmyyy kkeeyyysss aarree ssttuucckkk ttooggeettthhheeerrr.

    4. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimme a break. I've been around computers all my life, and can type faster with one hand than most people can with two.

    5. Re:Uh oh by 1nv4d3r · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I hear the wrists flailing away as a rush of furious masturbation is about to begin...

      And apparently leading the pack is...her father?

      I know it's a serious website, but I saw the picture and instinctively looked for the "Enter" link.

    6. Re:Uh oh by cscx · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yeah that is creepy, isn't it? Makes you wonder if her father is really Pete Townshend...

    7. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude... it's saturday night. :)

    8. Re:Uh oh by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      you're just jealous :P

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    9. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what hand are you using to hold the kleenex in, remind me never to use your keyboard you repugnant mother fucker.

    10. Re:Uh oh by jasonditz · · Score: 3, Informative

      In all fairness she might just be an airhead.

      I mean, its not like she made AIMster, she's just the yummy looking barely legal girl used to market it.

    11. Re:Uh oh by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      holy crap, she's got clothes on, for christs sake. at least sublimedirectory has got real nudes!! if /.'ers can get off so easily, i'm posting elsewhere!!

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    12. Re:Uh oh by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      let the fapping continue.

      We will, don't worry.

    13. Re:Uh oh by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I don't know... You think pictures less attractive than bra ads are going be a big deal to a group of people who have ready access to a whole internet full of free porn?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:Uh oh by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

      What happens when you slashdot a penis anyway?

    15. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's porn on the Internet?

    16. Re:Uh oh by Uart · · Score: 1

      At risk of being modded down...

      I made this for those less-than-mature moments on Fark.com, but I think it applies in this thread...

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    17. Re:Uh oh by mindriot · · Score: 1

      Kinda like a competition: "...uhhhnnnnnnngggg... First Post! Yessss!"

    18. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She was just 15 when these pics were made. And she's the daughter of the smug aimster CEO who used her tits for marketing.

    19. Re:Uh oh by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      Well, that's due to the Splashdot effect.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    20. Re:Uh oh by Arker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      She made a lot more sense than you did.

      I can't believe that you and the guy that responded she's an airhead got modded up.

      Are you little boys really that intimidated by the idea that a good-looking female might actually have a brain too?

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    21. Re:Uh oh by croddy · · Score: 1

      you seem to be persuaded she's intelligent. RTFA.

    22. Re:Uh oh by Arker · · Score: 1

      I did, dumbass.

      Maybe you should.

      Jesus Christ, what a bunch of catty old hosers this article attracted. If I didn't know better I'd think you were a bunch of girls.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    23. Re:Uh oh by linzeal · · Score: 1
      Hahahahah

      "Are you little boys really that intimidated by the idea that a good-looking female might actually have a brain too?"

      "Jesus Christ, what a bunch of catty old hosers this article attracted. If I didn't know better I'd think you were a bunch of girls."

      I think they need to spare some more cycles to simulate trolls better.

    24. Re:Uh oh by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Am I the only one that read the interview and immediately had Zappa's classic 'Valley Girl' rolling round my mind?

      Like, she's totally vacant, and the RIAA are, like, soooooo grody..

      Barf out, gag me with a spoon.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    25. Re:Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she's not that cute.
      also she's got flabs on her tummy...

  3. Well I sure as Hell Wouldnt by deathcow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kick her out of my download queue for eating crackers.

    1. Re:Well I sure as Hell Wouldnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...unless Crackers was the dog.

    2. Re:Well I sure as Hell Wouldnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like how she says in her interview that she still feels the same on the inside. Personally, I'm sure she feels fantastic on the inside.

    3. Re:Well I sure as Hell Wouldnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it.

  4. Aimee Deep? by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 4, Funny

    Lord have mercy on all the jokes that come with that last name.

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:Aimee Deep? by critter_hunter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not to mention that Aimée means "love" in french (from where the name no doubts originate). So, she likes it deep eh?

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    2. Re:Aimee Deep? by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      You are internally inconsistent. she LOVES it deep.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    3. Re:Aimee Deep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that Aimée means "love" in french
      More precisely, "loved"

    4. Re:Aimee Deep? by critter_hunter · · Score: 1

      I'm internally consistent because in French the verb "Aimer" means both "to love" and "to like". Nitpicker

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    5. Re:Aimee Deep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lord have mercy on all the jokes that come with that last name.

      Yes. Meanwhile, the writers of the next James Bond movie are scrambling to think of a sexually suggestive name that'll top that one. You can just hear them say "they stole our idea, DAMMIT!"

    6. Re:Aimee Deep? by krumms · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lord have mercy on all the jokes that come with that last name.

      You just made me cry.

      - Hamed Assfukarr

    7. Re:Aimee Deep? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I'm internally consistent because in French the verb "Aimer" means both "to love" and "to like". Nitpicker

      Um, last time I checked, French had adorer, which means "to love" as in "I love chocolate" (J'adore chocolat). The only time you use Aimer for love is when you're saying I love you (Je t'aime), or generally referring to the love a person has for another person.

      Anyway, if her name meant "loves deep", it'd have to be Adore Deep, not Aimee Deep.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    8. Re:Aimee Deep? by innerlimit · · Score: 1

      J'aime bien la musique! J'adore les simpsons

    9. Re:Aimee Deep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok so we've established that she loves it deep. Now the question is, does she crave girth too, or does she like those long skinny ones? ;)

    10. Re:Aimee Deep? by critter_hunter · · Score: 1

      Adorer in french has the same meaning as to adore in English: it refers to worship and devotion. It can also mean "aimer beaucoup" - which can then mean either "to love a lot" or "to like a lot", depending on context. Aimer is a very context- and intonation-dependant verb.

      --
      Karma: Could be worse (could be raining)
    11. Re: Aimee Deep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be suprised if she ended up doing porn. Cohoes isn't really a classy city. There's a 24 hour dunkin donuts there where plenty of Aimee types wander in at all hours. Me and some friends hang out there sometimes, it's an interesting place.. and usually pretty easy for a quick hookup.

  5. Should've Used Your Real Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Finally, someone who DESERVES to whore karma!

    1. Re:Should've Used Your Real Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should they change the name to "Bonester"?

  6. She doesn't look like..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...she's advertising for something to download MUSIC.

  7. Danger danger! by mrjive · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does her father know she dresses like that?

    Yowza!

    --
    If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
    1. Re:Danger danger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think her father asks her to dress like that... :-p

    2. Re:Danger danger! by DrStubbs · · Score: 1

      Presumably her father was directly involved. Creepy!

    3. Re:Danger danger! by cscx · · Score: 1

      Yeah come to think of it, most girls that do this type of "modeling" are quite fucked up in the most creative of ways. They're the farthest from "normal girl" as you can get, although you can't really tell that from the pictures.

    4. Re:Danger danger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by creative you mean insane bitch who needs a lot of pills to function in the world then yes.

      Trust me, once the looks go on these bitches they are more useless than a sack of dog craps.

    5. Re:Danger danger! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It never ceases to amaze me how nit-picky geek guys are about women.

      I knew a guy once that looked like Beavis. I'm not kidding. The guy was the spitting image of Beavis, down to the hair, oversize head, and everything. He'd never had a girlfriend in his life. Various women would show interest in him (never mind how desperate they must have been), but he rejected them, because they weren't supermodel-caliber in the facial appearance and body departments.

      Who the hell was this Beavis to care? But he did. And as far as I know he's still never had a girlfriend.

    6. Re:Danger danger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, since you hung out with him, are you... Butt-head?

    7. Re:Danger danger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but they're FAR more fun than so called 'normal' girls. Just make sure to end things before you have a psycho stalker on your hands.

    8. Re:Danger danger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who the hell was this Beavis to care? But he did. And as far as I know he's still never had a girlfriend."

      Well, the alternative would have been for him to sleep with girls he didn't find attractive, and he would probably have had to lie to them a lot even doing that.

      Seems to me like he made the better choice, even if it meant he didn't get a lot of sex.

    9. Re:Danger danger! by IceAgeComing · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It never ceases to amaze me how nit-picky geek guys are about women.

      There's an easy explanation. Geeks hide their fear of relationships behind their "high standards". Set your standards high enough and you'll never have to cope with the difficulties of relationships again.

      Of course I'm talking from experience.

    10. Re:Danger danger! by prell · · Score: 1
      I'm serious. That gut of hers makes Jabba the Hutt look like Calista Flockhart.
      I really don't know what to say to you other than I am simply amazed at the totally transparent, obviously superficial, absurd, and ultimately laughable attitude you have towards women. Even looking with an "MTV eye," an eye with some sort of a warped sociopathic complex, this woman looks emaciated.

      Well, I should be fair. I may be looking at this issue with a very narrow context: I knew a dude that rejected all women under the pretext that they didn't live up to his standards, and then he finally accepted he was gay. Perhaps there are other issues at play here as well. I celebrate homosexuality, so I'd like to make it explicitly clear that I'm not joking.
    11. Re:Danger danger! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm arse fucking

    12. Re:Danger danger! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      Likewise for me. I'm getting married in the fall and while my fiancee' won't be winning Miss America any time soon, she has more substance and personality than every contestant in the history of the pageant has had combined.

      The body always goes to hell anyway, so if you're going to be picky about looks you should be picky about facial features, which tend to hold up well (they just get wrinkled)

    13. Re:Danger danger! by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      What gut? I don't see one!

  8. Kinda like me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My father asked me to wear a bikini for some pictures on his company's website. Too bad I'm a guy.

    1. Re:Kinda like me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, that's nothing compared to what the creepy guy at the bus station that I call my father asked me to do for his website. I forget the URL, but I think it's got something to do with goats.

  9. Attractive?? by leandrod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Judging from the photo at the linked home page, people's tastes are degrading so much as to warrant my suspicion about us slipping into a new Middle Ages.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    1. Re:Attractive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She looks like any of 1000 other girls working at the Dairy Queen. No bad, just regular.

    2. Re:Attractive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, don't tell me you'd kick her out of bed.

      Sheesh, with media indoctrination nowadays, it seems like you have to be a supermodel to not be called ugly.

    3. Re:Attractive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If some bitch won't get out of the bed and go home, I have a sure fire trick that works--whip it out and pee on her. Stand up on the bed and piss on her lazy ho ass. Damn straight she'll get up and go home after you hose her down with your golden nectar.

    4. Re:Attractive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Indeed.

      "...highly attractive..."?

      The links provided sure dont show it. Some of the other photos linked above show her to be maybe MODERATELY attractive at best. Come on, I can go to a local college or University and see many women at least as attractive, and many more attractive. So I can only conclude that the poster has pretty some bizarre scale where "highly attractive" means average to slightly above average.

      Get out more, experience life, and get some better taste.

    5. Re:Attractive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not a slashdot regular, are you? I'm fairly sure getting rid of girls isn't a problem for most people here.

    6. Re:Attractive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh, yeah, now you get to sleep in your own piss. Alone. Brilliant.

    7. Re:Attractive?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOLOLOL hahahah.

      That was definatly the funniest slashdot post in a while!

  10. Er... by Synithium · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's like the co-founder of the company I work for. Whenever some buzz issue comes up he is an instant expert on it.

    On a side note, this chick is hot.

    Mod this down please, i can't believe i wrote it.

  11. what did she have to say besides looking good? by tucolino · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...hmmmm so who actually cared to read what she had to say?

    1. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree - this is ridiculous. There's a saying: "You used to be famous because you were somebody. Now you're somebody because you're famous."

      Sure, we'd all like to see her naked and petrified with hot grits down her pants, and, like another poster said, lord have mercy on all the jokes that come with that name, but who on Slashdot could possibly care what an 18 year old poster girl has to say about the legal issues of IP?

      Spare me.

      --

      "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    2. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by doormat · · Score: 1

      Geeks like hot girls because we typically cant get any of our own. And they're nice to look at...

      'nuff said.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    3. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by localman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I haven't even looked at the blog, so I'm talking out my ass here but...

      who on Slashdot could possibly care what an 18 year old poster girl has to say about the legal issues of IP?

      When did anyone on slashdot get such pompous standards as to what they read? God bless this site, but for Bob's sake it's nothing but a bunch of 18 year old (physically or otherwise) boys spouting off on the legal issues of IP and occasionally even more weighty topics.

      If there's one place that M. Nobody Inparticular can feel free to spout off like an authority on any topic, it's got to be slashdot.

      So - not to get too serious - but is the problem that she's a girl?

      Cheers.

    4. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      God bless this site, but for Bob's sake it's nothing but a bunch of 18 year old (physically or otherwise) boys spouting off on the legal issues of IP and occasionally even more weighty topics.

      If there's one place that M. Nobody Inparticular can feel free to spout off like an authority on any topic, it's got to be slashdot.

      So - not to get too serious - but is the problem that she's a girl?


      No, the problem is that the pompous rants of the average 18 year old Slashdotter doesn't make the headlines - at best they get a +2, informative. Why should it be any different just because somebody's got a set of boobs?

      I get enough of the obsession with sex at practically every other magazine, news site, TV channel etc. ad nauseam nowadays. Even the computer games magazines try to sell a few more issues with a hot chick on the cover, for Christ's sake. I want to believe Slashdot is an exception. I come here to read about tech, and to find this nonsensical celebrity worship over here as well just pisses me off.

      --

      "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    5. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can she be naked and have hot grits down her pants?

    6. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by Theodore+Logan · · Score: 2, Informative

      How can she be naked and have hot grits down her pants?

      Maybe that was why she removed them in the first place?

      --

      "If you think education is expensive, try ignorance" - Derek Bok

    7. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      Sure, we'd all like to see her naked and petrified with hot grits down her pants, and, like another poster said, lord have mercy on all the jokes that come with that name, but who on Slashdot could possibly care what an 18 year old poster girl has to say about the legal issues of IP?

      I was going to reply that this was "akin to finding in-depth political and social commentary with the celebrity-of-the-most-recent-fifteen-minutes" and "well, if JPGs of Melinda Gates in Victoria's Secret lingerie were floating around, we'd all switch to M$ in a fap-beat", but then I'se got to thinkin'.

      Tradeshows have been using cheesecake models to influence the techs (and whose with the corporate pursestrings) through their dumbsticks even before Madster/Amiee was toddling in diapers. Tain't nothing new. Now she's preening and posing for her/her dad's company/standpoint.

      So? Besides showing off skin and her corporate connection, is she really anyone significant techwise? Otherwise, I expect to hear from Paris Hilton on the impact of the SARS pandemic on the tourist industry.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    8. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by catalina · · Score: 1

      Does kinda give a new twist on the old saying "Out of the mouths of babes....."

    9. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell yeah! preach on brother!

    10. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i just think it's funny a 'hot grits' comment got +5 interesting haha

    11. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by happystink · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, the average slashdotter, 18 or not, has an impressive set of boobs. Your sentence should have read "Why should it be any different just because somebody's got a set of boobs (and is a girl)?"

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

    12. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by localman · · Score: 1

      Not trying to be argumentative, but why is there so much resentment towards the ladies? Let's say for a second that the interview is totally boring -- it wouldn't be the first such article on slashdot, and I'm sure people would complain in the comments, but sexuality wouldn't enter into it. It's almost like the crowd here likes to penalize "just because somebody's got a set of boobs". And I see this even in the case where there's no sexuality present - only gender.

      I agree all the sexmarketing is annoying -- and the tone of the article does capitalize on that to some extent. But what the heck, she's attractive and she's got slashdotesque opinions. Her visibility is probably more based on her father's connections than her gender or her comeliness.

      Anyways - I'm not ragging on you in particular. Just noting this slashdot tendancy: any time a female is mentioned on slashdot her gender is a main point of discussion. As a highly geeky guy who somehow ended up with several geeky female friends, the attitude really stands out to me.

    13. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because this is not just a boring article. It's hardly an article at all. It's an advertisement, and advertisement that's supposed to play off the high sex drive of geeks.

      I, personally, find this offensive. I'm guessing a lot of other people here find this offensive as well. If it's just a boring article, fine, I'll just mention how BSD is dying and then go read something else. But this is not just a boring article: it's an insult.

      Take your average boring article and take out the boring parts, and what do you have left? Pretty much nothing. Now take this article and take out the boring parts. What's left? Pages of "please want to sexx0r me, it gets me ever so much money and self-esteem!" I do not appreciate being treated this way.

      Call me thin-skinned, whatever, I don't care. This article is offensive.

    14. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      but who on Slashdot could possibly care what an 18 year old poster girl has to say about the legal issues of IP?

      She doesn't sound any less coherent than the average Slashdot poster, who often speak on issues by pulling unsupported opinions directly out of their asses, without ever offering any supporting evidence other than something moronically anecdotal.

      She may be something of an airhead, from the interview, but so are most of the folks here. At least she isn't an asshole to boot - and that puts her one-up right from the get-go.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    15. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      No, the problem is that the pompous rants of the average 18 year old Slashdotter doesn't make the headlines - at best they get a +2, informative. Why should it be any different just because somebody's got a set of boobs?

      You can't titty-fuck a +2 informative.

    16. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by Rhinobird · · Score: 1

      Why should it be any different just because somebody's got a set of boobs (and is a girl)?

      Well her's don't need to be shaved.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    17. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 1

      So do we all agree this article shouldn't have been on slashdot in the first place?

      Speaking of cheesecake models, I really find that annoying when some corporation (be it aimster or somecorp-not-selling-girlie-stuff) believes it can sell me something with a cute looking girl!
      NO ASSHOLES! I'll just look at the girl and that's FREE for me! Never gonna buy your products if you base your marketing on me being stupid! I'm not masochistic!

    18. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 1

      As someone posted earlier, at least the average slashdot poster does not make it to the frontpage and is easily ignored with the correct 'score' filter.

      I am not annoyed by the fact she's answering to an interview (who wouldn't? FAME!), not even by the fact that greplaw wanted to interview her (They couldn't know beforehand she would be so flat and empty).
      I'm annoyed because this way below average interview made it to the frontpage and only because she was kinda hot and remotely interested in tech.
      I'm annoyed slashdot thought "Wow, this is better than chicks-with-guns! Our readers will love this interview, because it is a hot chick, and hot chicks have more rights than men or unattractive women when it comes to saying inane things!"

    19. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by bj8rn · · Score: 1
      God bless this site, but for Bob's sake it's nothing but a bunch of 18 year old (physically or otherwise) boys spouting off on the legal issues of IP and occasionally even more weighty topics.

      I think the reason why this is so, is that it's so easy to talk about these things - just repeat whatever someone else has already said a thousand times before, instant karma pouring in moments after. It's not so easy to say something meaningful about twin primes and latest additions to Java and other topics not covered in every second Slashdot article

      --
      Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    20. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by croddy · · Score: 1
      well, at least on /. there is a system for determining what gets posted as stories; anyone can submit a story. there's a democratic moderation system (for better or worse), and anyone can post a comment without it being deleted.

      contrast blog-land: one person picks what gets posted. one person submits the stories. there is no moderation or editing, save the amount of blog-scene-points the blogger can accrue. comments subject to deletion.

      you see anything +5 Insightful on her blog? I see plenty of 0 Redundant. the problem's not that she's a girl. the problem is that she's ignorant+dogmatic.

    21. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by imadork · · Score: 1
      who on Slashdot could possibly care what an 18 year old poster girl has to say about the legal issues of IP?

      Maybe because most of the slashdot population will listen to women who are older than they are?

    22. Re:what did she have to say besides looking good? by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      I've never even heard of her and never really expect to see anything else from her. However, I think her story has a right to be posted here, If only because she is a part of "Geek" culture. Even if it is in the same regards as goatse.cx.

  12. I'll bet her dad picks out the clothes by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1
    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  13. Heh, met her by Ryvar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Back when her father was just starting Madster I met him and Aimee while the guy working behind their local CompUSA's Upgrades (read: Help) Desk (Albany NY region) - got to chatting about filesharing and some of the finer legal points (particularly the differences between what we do see and ought to see) of it with them.

    I dunno, she just wasn't that hot in person . . . a little too much makeup. I honestly think her father encourages it - he seemed quite proud of her being all tarted up (and I say this as a completely amoral individual - it was a bit ridiculous).

    1. Re:Heh, met her by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First of all... He worked at the CompuUSA in Albany?? I've gone there so many times, and to think I could have met a (semi-)famous person.

      Second of all I remember trying aimster about two years ago and thinking how great it would be to have a tool in conjunction with aim so that I could share files with my friends on my buddy list.

      I soon found out that aimster had very very little integration with aim, and aim's file transfer capabilities. They made it seem like it was almost like an (unauthorized) add on component for aim or something. I emailed their tech support confused and wondering where the integration with aim was, and told them what it looked like to me. The response I got back basically admitted to exactly what I thought. I was actually kinda stunned at the honesty.

      I haven't even thought about aimster in years, maybe it's worth a new look.

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
  14. Uh... by cybermace5 · · Score: 5, Funny

    She says she hopes to fall in love, and asks "Any takers?"

    *raises a hand*

    Please please please mod me up to +5, so if she reads Slashdot she'll see my post!

    C'mon guys...

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Uh... by cybermace5 · · Score: 0

      I changed my mind. Please mod me DOWN, I forgot that I am a geek and supposed to be shy and inept around women.

      I'm so embarrassed.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Uh... by cybermace5 · · Score: 0

      STOP IT! I'm getting all flustered and stuttery!

      --
      ...
    3. Re:Uh... by inkedmn · · Score: 1

      it's ok, just about everybody here would choke (no, NOT the chicken - that's later) if she showed up at their front door...

      --
      well, it's nothing one behind the ear wouldn't cure
    4. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't.

      I'd have my wife go and tell her to get the fuck off my property.

    5. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I changed my mind. Please mod me DOWN, I forgot that I am a geek and supposed to be shy and inept around women.

      I'm so embarrassed.

      I think you got it just right ;-).

    6. Re:Uh... by fobbman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ya might wanna know that she's been file shared a bit herself, if ya know what I mean.

      Better scan for viruses before you stick that on your hard drive.

    7. Re:Uh... by Savatte · · Score: 1

      I live in Albany, which is about a 15 minute drive from Cohoes. I'll rent you a spot in my parents' basement so you can stalk/meet her. $50 bucks a week. Ill knock it down to $35 if you can get naked pictures or her.

    8. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *raises a hand*

      yeah right... like we don't know where your hands are

    9. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much will you knock it down if I can get video of her shaving her bush to form "/."?

    10. Re:Uh... by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      $200 a month? That's a pretty good deal, even for a basement. Do you have broadband?

      --
      ...
    11. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No worry. He wants to fuck her in the rectum.

  15. Is it me or... by irabinovitch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it me or did she basically sound like a giddy 12 year old in that interview. Usually it helps to answer the question the interiewer is actually asking.

    1. Re:Is it me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right...I don't think I have ever seen an interview work that way.

    2. Re:Is it me or... by McAddress · · Score: 1

      Holy Hell. Someone actually read the interview instead of just looking at the pics.

    3. Re:Is it me or... by irabinovitch · · Score: 1

      Stick to the pics. As I said before the interview is trash.

    4. Re:Is it me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ooh, you read the interview? I thought we were all talking about what she looked like..

    5. Re:Is it me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She sure is pretty.

      Pretty annoying, that is.

      Yeah she's hot, but she comes across as a High Maintenance person in that interview. When she gets old and crusty, nobody's going to give a darn about what she says.

  16. Re:Er... by Servo · · Score: 1

    Hot is a very relative term.

    Personally, I think her face is not attractive whatsoever, and her body isn't anything special.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  17. Why do so many women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    use their body and fliting to get ahead, don't they ever want to be judged by their mind and merrits? even when you click the link for the interview her picture still stays there taking up half the frame, like its part of the content or something, and the first question is just flirty remarks.

    That being said my nipples are hard and she has a great future ahead of her.

    1. Re:Why do so many women by Ryan+Stortz · · Score: 1

      is it me or did anyone else wanna mod this as funny?

      --
      Bugs are just features that have been fixed.
    2. Re:Why do so many women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because having a good body is a merit .. or do you deny millions of years of evolution and biology?

      It's just as wrong for a woman to deny her beauty as it is her intelligence, if you ask me.

      Or a man for that matter but I think a man's "beauty" comes across in his personality rather than his looks but you can't really get that in a picture.

      *shrug*

      I guess it's politically correct to say stuff like you did but I really don't think a person should shun taking advantage of whatever assets they have.

      In the case of this chick though I think she goes too far and that's a bit of a turn off for me. Can't blame other guys who think differently though.

    3. Re:Why do so many women by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I guess it's politically correct to say stuff like you did but I really don't think a person should shun taking advantage of whatever assets they have."


      The problem is not putting yourself ahead of the class with whatever assets you possess, the problem is that it is her only asset apparently.
      I'm recently single and I'm AMAZED at how many women have been getting though life with their crotch. It is a myth that all men only want a good pair of 'jugs'. We also want a woman who can challenge us on an intellectual level and dress up in a nazi outfit then beat us with a warm squash or something.. umm i sense i've gone to far....

    4. Re:Why do so many women by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      use their body and fliting to get ahead, don't they ever want to be judged by their mind and merrits?

      Actually, this just proves that she's savvy and cunning. Knowing that her readers are, for the most part, socially inept mysogynistic pseudo-geek losers, she panders directly to the one body part she *knows* isn't getting any action, while at the same time taking pains not to appear too intelligent - and thus threatening - to the woman-hating/fearing readership.

      About the only men she's going to insult with these tactics are the gay ones, who're just jealous that they don't, and never will, look as good as Ms. Deep.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    5. Re:Why do so many women by Arker · · Score: 1

      [Why do so many women] use their body and fliting [sic] to get ahead,

      Umm because it works?

      don't they ever want to be judged by their mind and merrits?[sic]

      Are the two exclusive? I don't think so.

      There is a school of thought that says 'if you've got it, flaunt it' and I'm not saying I completely agree with it, but it's certainly a satisfactory behaviour as long as others do.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    6. Re:Why do so many women by Anitra · · Score: 1

      use their body and fliting(sic) to get ahead, don't they ever want to be judged by their mind and merrits?(sic)

      There are women out there who want to be judged on their merits and their intelligence. However, these are not the ones /. stories and marketing ploys are about. Why?
      Two reasons, really:

      1. Guys ALWAYS (ok, 95% of the time) judge women on their bodies. Whether they also evaluate their other merits depends on the guy and the woman.

      2. Sex sells. Brains don't. (See #1).

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
  18. I figured it out by heli0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I finally figured out who this chick is from this story. It's "Aimee-Deep-Boobies-for-the-boys.png

    I talked to her agent. If you want her to model with guns for you it is $500/hr.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:I figured it out by hendridm · · Score: 1

      > If you want her to model with guns for you it is $500/hr.

      Judging by the pictures in the first link, we aren't talking about the same "guns"...

  19. Re:Calling all C programmers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly.

  20. So she gets to make slashdot news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    just because she has a set of tits?

    I can't stop laughing at the thought some people get obsessed with others. Like people who fantasize about actresses, musicians and now some piece of skin with two nipples (not that particularly pretty either) just because she says "yay EFF" ?

    uh huh...interesting

  21. Uhh by ogre2112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who gives a shit?

    No, seriously. This is like interviewing Anna Nicole Smith. She got famous from
    showing her tits, and now all of the sudden we're supposed to be interested in her message ?

    1. Re:Uhh by secolactico · · Score: 0

      She got famous from showing her tits, and now all of the sudden we're supposed to be interested in her message ?

      Dude, I was correct. Slashdot *is* sinking to Fark levels. Only they forgot to add the boobies tag and "SFW" and somehow work "Duke sucks" or "France surrenders" to the title.

      The funniest part in the article was the "Tatu pics of nude teens" link midway down the page.

      Oh yeah, "worst.slashdot-article.ever".

      --
      No sig
    2. Re:Uhh by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      no,no,no. You misspelt it. It's massage, with an 'a'

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    3. Re:Uhh by eht · · Score: 1

      are you kidding? fark has always been way better than slashdot

    4. Re:Uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As long as all the stupid Republican flamewars don't come along with it, I'd be willing to accept such a lowering of standards in exchange for the total elimination of all the stupid "Minor Update to GNU NetOpenFreeProgram 5.82.73001 Revision 63453 Alpha 3" articles from the front page.

      And I, for one, welcome our new teenage-copyright-law-girl/pseudo-lesbian-Russian- pop-duo overlords.

    5. Re:Uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      She got famous from
      showing her tits

      If she really got famous for this, why oh why has not a single slashdotter posted a picture of this actually happening? SHOW YER TITS!!!

    6. Re:Uhh by chewy_2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the interview was void of any actual content. Apart from anything, I found her comment that Madonna should release her album in MP3 like Radiohead has. Hail To The Thief, Radiohead's latest album, was leaked a couple of months ago. The band did not approve, and were quite shat.

    7. Re:Uhh by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

      Who gives a shit?

      No, seriously. This is like interviewing Anna Nicole Smith. She got famous from
      showing her tits, and now all of the sudden we're supposed to be interested in her message ?


      Let me address a few points:

      First the left nipple.

      Now the right nipple.

      All clear now?

      (IIRC, there was a saying about "the medium is the message.)

      .

      --
      Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    8. Re:Uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a longtime /. reader and former dweller of Albany, I wholeheartedly concur. Worst.slashdot-article.ever

    9. Re:Uhh by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      Oh if only I had mod points...
      I read it looking for something worth while, but I don't think she has any clue about it. Are greplaw trying to get more people to read by having the hint of "sex" on their page?

  22. Re:Er... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 4, Funny

    For god's sake man, this is a geek girl.
    Anything under 19 stone is Venus.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  23. Ah, Slashdot... by shigelojoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    A place where cute girls' names end with a file extension.

    How romantic.

  24. If I owned Madster... by CptChipJew · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wouldn't have my own daughter parade around like that.

    I say this of course, because she has a spare tire. ::drum roll::

    Really though, Madster must be low on funds, because you can hire perfect 10's with much lower morals to do this stuff. I mean, look at the Linux Girl. Yum.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:If I owned Madster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a rim shot, not a drum roll.

    2. Re:If I owned Madster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It says "Linux" on here underwear. Does that mean it's "open source"?

    3. Re:If I owned Madster... by maxpublic · · Score: 0, Troll

      Linux girl? You mean the anorexic crack-whore your link leads to? Ye gods man, the only thing I want to do with that woman is feed her, then check her into rehab....

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    4. Re:If I owned Madster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you like big butts and you cannot lie!

    5. Re:If I owned Madster... by starnix · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just because you can't get chicks that look that good doesnt mean you have to pretend you dont like them. We're all friends here. Stop lying to yourself.

    6. Re:If I owned Madster... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Unfortunately, it also means just as buggy. Ew.

    7. Re:If I owned Madster... by Fishd · · Score: 1

      um, the "linux girl" is actually British actress Lisa Faulkner. http://us.imdb.com/Name?Faulkner,+Lisa

  25. Don't forget by Evro · · Score: 5, Informative

    Everything you think you know about aimster is a complete lie. See my journal for details. In short, she had nothing to do with Aimster, nor is her name even Aimee - that was a fabrication to evade AOL's trademark lawyers (which failed miserably, which is why it's now called "Madster" - her name is Madeline). Aimster/Madster is operated by a thief and a felon (his "business partner"). As far as I can tell, the "music pundit" site is written by a third party - probably a professional writer - with all website "comments" being filtered by "Aimee's" dad.

    I find it sad that Greplaw would stoop this low, but since John is a Harvard alum I guess it's easily possible that he arranged this "interview" to drum up press.

    As for the interview itself, I would like to know how it was conducted. It looks to me like it was conducted over AIM, in which case I'm sure John either wrote the responses himself or was standing over the typist's shoulder coaching him/her. If it was conducted over telephone or in person I'd be very surprised.

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice to see not everyone is a total moron.

      Thank you.

      I mean the whole tactic of linking the product name to the image of a sexy chick is so blatant I don't know how anyone could not understand but somehow idiots are still bamboozled by even the weakest marketing techniques.

    2. Re:Don't forget by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 3, Funny

      No one can be told what Aimee is. You have to see her for yourself. This is your last chance. After this there is no turning back.

    3. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was an absolutely friggin hilarious reference.

    4. Re:Don't forget by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Slashdot doesn't care as long as this article generates exposures for that nice big banner ad. Interesting that the ads appear on the pointless Microsoft articles and "today's SCO news" articles as well, isn't it? Financial motives influence the selection of articles these days.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    5. Re:Don't forget by bahamutirc · · Score: 1

      Excellent. These are the rare posts that I read Slashdot for. Thank you. Where did you find out who Aimster was operated by?

    6. Re:Don't forget by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Read his journal. Guy worked for 'em.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:Don't forget by gmhowell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I gotta say though.... Poking Maddie/Aimee might make you feel a bit better about how her daddy fucked you.

      I'd stick it in her butt just to be sure.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    8. Re:Don't forget by 1029 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As for the interview itself, I would like to know how it was conducted. It looks to me like it was conducted over AIM, in which case I'm sure John either wrote the responses himself or was standing over the typist's shoulder coaching him/her. If it was conducted over telephone or in person I'd be very surprised.

      Wow, rather intimidated by good looking women aren't you? So let me get this straight, from the lack of evidence to suggest she is a brainless twit, it would appear that she couldn't have typed the answers herself because:
      A) She is a girl
      B) She is a hot girl (as if looks relate to brains in any way)
      C) She is only 18
      D) Someone else (not her) involved in Aimster is a felon (BTW, if you have ever used a P2P system, you are probably a thief, maybe even a felon)

      Would you have the same contempt if it were an 18 year old male "hacker"?

      I can't honestly say I know for sure that she is very smart, or concerned about any of the issues brought up in the interview. But what reason does anyone have to doubt her intelligence?

      --
      - I love animals. I try to eat at least one a day.
    9. Re:Don't forget by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

      If you read his journal you would know that he worked for this company. Having done so I think he knows how this guy operates: aka whoring his daughter for money. If you go to her site its pretty obvious its all BS and not written by her. Get a clue

      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
    10. Re:Don't forget by happystink · · Score: 1

      It's true, never underestimate the stupidity of anyone, whether they read slashdot or not, as the dozens of drooling non-critical comments in this story suggests. People will believe what they want to believe, and this time it happens to be a lonely, super-hot 18-yr old girl who is really into P2P issues. I don't think I could make someone up that would better appeal to the average stereotypical geek circa 2003, so bravo to Johnny Deep for at least knowing what people want (his daughter in a bikini).

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

    11. Re:Don't forget by Evro · · Score: 1

      word. Thanks. :-P

      --
      rooooar
    12. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you have the same contempt if it were an 18 year old male "hacker"?

      Would you have the admiration if it were an 18 year old make hacker?

      I mean did you even read that interview?

      You really need a nice pair of tits if you are gonna get away with saying anything that lame in an interview!

    13. Re:Don't forget by SkArcher · · Score: 1

      For so many reasons, This page comes to mind.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    14. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like Aimee to suck my dick. Yep. She needs a practice daddy to teach her the finer ways of oralizing a man.

    15. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      can we possibly mod this up to +7?

      (that's octal of course)

    16. Re:Don't forget by the+gnat · · Score: 1

      I've only heard of Aimee Deep or looked at her site one or two times in the past, but it seemed immediately obvious that it had to be a scam of some sort. Or, at the very least, there's something seriously wrong with her dad. I'm not afraid of attractive or intelligent women, and I've known many who were both, but I've never met anyone who would debase themselves to make a legal argument. Besides, all her views could be compiled by reading Slashdot comments on an RIAA/MPAA article, then run through an "Alicia-Silverstone-in-Clueless" filter.

      What's pathetic is how many geeks are fooled by this act. The girl clearly knows virtually nothing about the intricacies or history of copyright law or the economics of the industry, but gets to be an unofficial spokesman for music piracy because she has nice tits. (And no, *I'm* not being sexist, it's this whole bullshit charade that's sexist in the first place.)

      [ By the way, she is hot. Some of the other posters need to rejoin the real world and stop looking at too much hentai. ]

    17. Re:Don't forget by krumms · · Score: 1

      I had to laugh at this:

      This letter acknowledges your agreement to accept an option to acquire 10 shares of Pi2, Inc. (the "Company") common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01

      So, counting up on my two hands, that comes to ... ten cents? What the fuck were they trying to pull??

    18. Re:Don't forget by amlutias · · Score: 1

      because what she says in the interview makes her look like a daft moron?

      "The oral arguments are due June 4th, why should Greplaw readers go to Chicago to attend?

      To get a kiss from me?"

      is just so retarded.

    19. Re:Don't forget by Palshife · · Score: 1

      Oh please, dear God, please remember the name John Deep and rue it until the day you die. The name John Deep should be to geeks as kryptonite is to Superman.

      I also had the misfortune of working for John Deep. He is a manipulative criminal. He started Aimster/Madster/Intranaut/BuddyUSA by exploiting the hopes of college students at Rensselear Polytechnic Institute in Troy, NY. He promised big money and didn't deliver, but worst of all, he delivered little by little while tricking you into handing whatever you had over to him.

      The man manipulates everyone, including his own daughter, who he whores out to sell his wares. Her name isn't even Aimee. I've met her.

      This is not a bad businessman or a lousy person. This man embodies evil on this planet. This man needs to be killed in public.

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    20. Re:Don't forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked for Aimee's father, John, back in '99-'00. He only owes me about a grand, which is a lot better off than some people, above poster included (a former roommate of mine, BTW). I worked for John back when the company was called Intranaut, and I have paycheck stubs, etc. to prove it. I'll be starting a site soon about all of the crap that went on there.

      Also, I met "Aimee" when she was about 14 or 15, and her name was Madeline. It was at John's 50th birthday party in Cohoes, NY.

  26. Ya know... by istartedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I was gonna post and say "who cares about the interview, why not just go straight to the pictorial?" but you beat me to it. Well done!

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Ya know... by G27+Radio · · Score: 1

      What? There was an interview?

  27. Aimee Deep? by Kurt+Russell · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'm 18 and a Senior at Cohoes Public High School in Cohoes, New York. When I graduate, I hope to start a publishing company so that I can - yes, you heard right - make money from selling copyrighted art.

    With a name like that the only "art" you're gonna sell is porn.

  28. Yes, it is in fact possible... by LostCluster · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Intelligent writing coming from a young and attractive female... it can and does happen from time to time. I'm not sure the ACs here are going to be able to handle this...

    1. Re:Yes, it is in fact possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      _Someone_ didn't read the article before posting again apparently...

    2. Re:Yes, it is in fact possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you think that's intelligent writing then you really need to shut off the cartoon channel and go get a decent education!

      I've seen more thoughtful interviews with penthouse models...

    3. Re:Yes, it is in fact possible... by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      # How has the proceedings affected the development of Madster?

      I think I'm better for it. I've learned a lot about the law, and how the world works. And I've learned from my Dad that you never give up.

      # How has the proceedings affected you personally?

      Oh sorry, I thought you already asked that question. It is all about me, you know. ...... intelligent, riiiiiight

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    4. Re:Yes, it is in fact possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember her nickname is supposed to be "aimster" and now post-lawsuit her nickname is "madster" you see...

      I know it's the lame. I mean if you handed in a paper outlining such a cheesy marketing strategy at school you'd get a C but oh well...

    5. Re:Yes, it is in fact possible... by elmegil · · Score: 1

      Nothing to do with AC's, you need to do some background checks. Chances are good it's just more smoke from the creep who runs Madster.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    6. Re:Yes, it is in fact possible... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, I hate to break it to you, but my childhood Speak-n-spell is more intelligent than her. At least my Speak-n-spell would be smart enough to read the stereotypical rightist libertarian diatribe before parroting it.

    7. Re:Yes, it is in fact possible... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the tone of the interview sounded like this:

      "WOO! EFF is like, totally cool! Fight for your rights and use my daddy's service! Goooooo Madster! WOOOOO!"

      Hate to break it to you, but Aimee Deep ain't very deep.

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  29. Re:Er... by Synithium · · Score: 1

    The girls round where i live all have the glazed look of sheeps. Only problem is that they still have the reflex.

    Good God, another one.

  30. Re:Calling all C programmers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just goes to show, with open source software, you really do get what you pay for.

  31. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so your father is a NAMBLA president too?

    what a coincidence! so is mine!

    1. Re:wow by Phosphor3k · · Score: 2, Funny

      North American Marlin Brando Look-alike Association?

  32. Aimee who? by mnemonic_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone heard of this person? Does anyone care?

  33. Meh... by Cornelius+Chesterfie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Kinda off-topic, but if she's 18 now, and she's been a "poster girl" for years...no, nevermind.

    I worry about the sexualization (sp) of underage girls on the internet. I remember those "post pictures of hot chicks" threads at the Something Awful forums that had way too many underage girls. Perhaps an unspoken fetish?

    1. Re:Meh... by BitHive · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps it's because most of the people on SA are underage boys...

    2. Re:Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Perhaps an unspoken fetish?"


      Are you kidding? This has to be one of the most widely known, spoken about, and copped to fetishes out there. I can't count the number of times i've seen a girl called hot (or called a girl hot), after which it was pointed out that the girl was probably underage.


      I mean, was there ever much question as to why, say, Britney Spears was considered so hot?

  34. Re:In the SF bay area she would be a hottie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that because they are all guys?

  35. Scoring option needed... by aztektum · · Score: 5, Funny

    +1 Desperate

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  36. OK, let me get this straight.... by tsvk · · Score: 3, Funny
    • she's really cute, pretty and good-looking
    • she's 18
    • she seems intellectual and bright (has a position regarding Internet rights, privacy, is pro-EFF and anti-RIAA/MPAA, etc.)
    • ...and yet she's single and needs to bring that forward by saying "Any takers?" and "I'm looking for Mr. Right." in an interview?

    I don't get it. She's like the Slashdotter's perfect girlfriend.... Erm.... Well... BTW, anyone have her phone-number?

    1. Re:OK, let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called stealth marketing fucktard.

      She's selling a product.

      Damn i can't believe people are still so gullible.

      Sheesh.

    2. Re:OK, let me get this straight.... by unborn · · Score: 1

      There should moderation: Sad

    3. Re:OK, let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She seems intellectual and bright???

      Gimme a break...

    4. Re:OK, let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, she's a bimbo with the IQ of a garden gnome. That she was able to memorise the word "copyright" between flirting lessons doesn't make her any smarter.

    5. Re:OK, let me get this straight.... by nmos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's called MARKETING!

    6. Re:OK, let me get this straight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Madeline Deep
      (518) 237-2260

      Let me know how it goes

    7. Re:OK, let me get this straight.... by mindriot · · Score: 1

      She said "Mr. (copy)Right"... unfortunately, most of us are more of a "Mr. (copy)Left". Damn. :)

  37. Ummm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She says her dad's name is Jonny Deep. I call shenanigans.

    1. Re:Ummm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deep, not Depp, if that's what you're thinking. And if not, why would you call "shenanigans"?

  38. liar.. by abhisarda · · Score: 1
    "responces"
    It's pretty obvious your only using one hand for typing. ;)
  39. OK who let the blonde out? by Suchetha · · Score: 1

    folks i read that damned interview and i gotta say that i am STUNNED... stunned that someone like greplaw would actually conduct such a vapid lacking-any-form-or-substance interview with what seems to be yet another airheaded bimbo... was it just me or was that interview painful to read.. i kept getting visions of Melody from Josie and the Pussycats (the comic book not the movie).. YMMV

    the interview was poor, and i would agree with teh poster who said this was probably done on AIM with her father looking over her shoulder.. her answers to some questions are TOTALLY different from the style of her answers to others.. on the whole i would say that either a. her father was coaching her (which would totally take away the point of the interview which as she so rightly said 'is about her' b. she has MPS (in which case she needs help) c. she is playing a blonde bimbo when she is really a fairly vocal and insightful person (which i doubt, but if she is, putting forward her affected "dumb blonde" persona in an interview is insulting both to the interviewer and her audience)

    if you want her you can have her, but i, personally, prefer a female of more substance than aimee deep

    Suchetha

    --

    learn from yesterday, plan for tomorrow, party tonight
    or one out of three ain't bad
  40. Re:Calling all C programmers! by mako · · Score: 1
    Use getcwd(). Functions which do not require/allow the user to specify buffer size are being depricated. Your use of getwd() would probably not cause problems except from the man page:

    The getwd() function does not do sufficient error checking and is not able to return very long, but valid, paths. It is provided for compatibility.

    Best practice dictates using getcwd, however, if you are just messing with old software it probably won't be a problem.
  41. Damnit by mao+che+minh · · Score: 4, Funny
    I just got done doing the boyfriend thing and taking my girl and her little sister to "Finding Nemo". We got back and I fired up the computer, and was browsing Slashdot. She was like "what is that site anyways" (because it is up in a browser almost everytime she goes to use the computer) and I gave the canned response "it's a site where a lot of us computer pro's come to discuss technology and what not. Nothing that you would be interested in". She has found my hidden porn archives twice already, and I could see her growing skepticism.

    So I show her the newest story, hoping to clarify things, and click the link.....up comes a woman looking alot like her (my type: tanned, "hand sized", long hair....).....thanks a fucking lot guys. I'm gonna have to spend like $50 in flowers and shit now!

    1. Re:Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess those archives weren't so hidden.

    2. Re:Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude...your girlfriend's a bitch. Hope it's all worth it!

    3. Re:Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Uh, ever thought of discussing the porn archive with her? I am sure it is a novel idea, but maybe you could, you know, watch it together? Unless you aren't having sex with her. In that case, she shouldn't be touching your computer. Personally, I wouldn't let a girlfriend interface with my computer until, to put it bluntly, I interfaced with her. Need some kind of commitment first.

    4. Re:Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the most part, you are right on. If you like porn and your girlfriend/wife has got a problem with it, your life is going to suck - guilt, fighting, etc over stupid things.

      Most women who have problems with their men looking at porn think it means there is a problem in the relationship along the lines of her not being good enough for him. When in fact 99% of men just like to look at naked women and it doesn't matter who it is as long as they are at least semi-good-looking and female - and typically the more naked females in the same picture the better, nothing more (and hard to be much less). 10 seconds after a guy closes the playboy mag or closes his autopr0n.com web browser, he can't tell you anything about the naked chicks he was looking at, not even if they were blond or brunette. Once the girls understand that guys are just wired that way, your relationship can be a lot more open and trusting.

      It is like guys have to accept that for most women, no matter how naturally gorgeous, even super-model level, they tend to feel better about their self-image if they've put some make-up on. (Ok, that *might* be a societal synaptic wiring rather than a biological synaptic wiring, but the end result is the same - guys like to look at pussy, women like to put cornstarch on their faces. Why ask why, just accept it and move on to the important stuff in a relationship).

    5. Re:Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has found my hidden porn archives twice alredy

      Dude, seriously, it's not that hard to hide your porno from your girlfriend. Of course, I am speaking hypothetically from the standpoint that slashdot readers have girlfriends. Looking at many of the posts, it looks like porn == girlfriend anyway, in which case hiding it is not a problem.

    6. Re:Damnit by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      She has found my hidden porn archives twice already, and I could see her growing skepticism.

      There is no point in hiding things from girlfriends. You will hide it. They will find it. That's just the way they are. The first time you left your girl home, she looked in your closet, she went through your stuff, and she pressed the redial button on your phone. A few months into the relationship, she will have found everything.

      Hiding and denying things is only giving her the power to manipulate you. Hopefully, your response was "Yes, you found porn. So what? There is nothing wrong with porn".

    7. Re:Damnit by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Some freakin' computer pro, if you can't properly hide and lock out your porn collection...don't quit your dayjob....

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    8. Re:Damnit by jred · · Score: 1

      Just to note: This does *not* work if there's any porn of you and an ex. You were supposed to have destroyed all that when the two of you started dating. You can have 200 random mpgs, and 2 that you "star" in, and all of them get lumped in with the two.

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    9. Re:Damnit by Troed · · Score: 1
      Huh? Of course you can hide whatever you want. Encrypted partitions - only unlocked when you actually use them - then locked again.


      E4M (Encryption for the Masses) is what I use. It _was_ open source, freely available from http://www.e4m.net - but now it's gone payware. However, this is what the license says:

      This product can be copied and distributed free of charge, including source code.

      ... so I'm handing out the w32 .exe I have here to everyone who wants it. I guess there are others with the sourcecode aswell.

    10. Re:Damnit by rat7307 · · Score: 1

      She has found my hidden porn archives twice already

      Hey dude the Windows +h attrib aint worht squat nowadays with all these fancy guis..

      Thats why (COUGH)Someone I Know(/COUGH) uses multi log ins on his Win2k & Linux Boxes..

      Use chmod 700 on the dirs!!!

      --
      Burma?
    11. Re:Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "hand sized"

      You do now why most men prefer petite girls don't you? It is because it makes them feel larger.

      Congratulations little dick.

    12. Re:Damnit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's quite an elaborate story to try and make us believe you have a girlfriend that looks anything like Aimee Deep. Nice try, buddy!

    13. Re:Damnit by chillichic · · Score: 1

      I thought it was a site for computer nerds.

  42. [OT] Linux girl needs... by SaDan · · Score: 1

    ...to be fed a couple cheeseburgers. Damn, put some meat on those bones!

  43. doesn't want to change copyright law??? by Kernel+Corndog · · Score: 1

    First, to all those who are wondering why we should care what this poster girl might say: spokespersons are there to get the word to the people. Have you ever known a spokesperson to give all the nitty-gritty (geeky) facts? If she can appeal to the masses about what's going on, hopefully the masses will research more. Right now, IMO the masses don't even know what is going on and at the current rate can only get pissed off after the fact.

    Second, to the spokesmodel. If you love Lawence Lessig and other copyright guys... you need to start paying more attention to their message. It doesn't appear to me that you have because they /ARE/ trying to get the copyright law changed and you said you didn't want to do that. The message you need to be getting out is the constant amendments to the copyright law with the latest being the Sonny Bono copyright act and the DMCA, are continually increasing the protection duration to extraordinary limits. Currently I believe it's 150 years past the original filers death. Lessig is trying to show that is insane. That is a detriment to the evolution of the collective creativeness of America and the world.

    The latest ruling against Lessig by the Supreme court means that we need to show Congress this because the courts aren't going to help. Congress is going to continually listen to the cash flowing from the RIAA and MPAA until our voices raise up. That is what you should be doing.... getting the commoner to care about this and to lend their voice to the cause.

  44. "Attractive"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offense to Aimee, I am sure she is a nice lady and just not my type (as am probably not hers). That said: SHE is supposed to be attractive?

    You don't get out enough.

    Oh, wait... /. Pot, kettle... nevermind.

  45. Re:In the SF bay area she would be a hottie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's right, don't let the long hair fool you.

  46. "it's a site where a lot of us computer pro's..." by SaDan · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could you kindly point out where these "pro's" have been hiding? Thanks.

    And don't blame Slashdot for ruining your relationship. This site certianly isn't for people who have lives.

  47. Highly attractive cover-girl? No. Pointless? Yes by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Highly attractive? Well, that's open to debate. Let's just say that I wouldn't look twice at her but, from the posts I've seen so far, there are obviously some people out there who would kill their mothers to meet this girl.

    Speaking of "girl", that's exactly what she is: a girl and not a woman. If a thinly-veiled opportunity to lust over someone who's not even out of her teens is considered "News for Nerds" or "Stuff that matters" then is it any wonder that Slashdot is often laughed at by more mainstream news outlets and (IIRC) blocked by some parental control software? And I haven't even mentioned sexism.

    Anyhow, all that could be excused if she had something useful (informative, insightful, interesting, funny or any combination thereof) to say. But, clearly, she doesn't. What next: interviews with Cameron Diaz on her favourite websites?

    Seriously, between this story and the earlier story about (shock, horror) a review of a mobile phone, this must have been a seriously slow news day. Personally, I think it's sad that the Slashdot editors haven't yet grasped the concept that publishing for publishing's sake is a mistake rather than a necessity.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  48. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's funny because it's so damn true.

  49. You forgot one thing: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we're all fat, and afraid of girls....

  50. Page hits by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's like I said in a previous comment--Slashdot is not the cool tech news site it once was. It is now a corporate-owned site whose purpose is to generate geek page hits for banner ads.

    Not surprisingly, the Microsoft articles always have banner ads. And what do you know? I look at the top of an obvious page-hit article like this, and it has a banner ad. Hmm.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  51. Re:Highly attractive cover-girl? No. Pointless? Ye by poptones · · Score: 1
    Since when do we need an "excuse" (veiled or otherwise) to "lust over teenage girls?" Or is it only OK when it's on TV or a fashion mag done by those "respectable" publishers?

    Madeline Aimee Deep -- I was 15 when Aimster first came out. I may look different, but I still feel the same on the inside.

    Amazing, after all those fisting videos...

  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. Re:Er... by zephc · · Score: 1

    "Anything under 19 stone is Venus."

    nice use of semi-archaic weight measurements

    19 stone = 266 lbs = 120 kg. Sounds about right.

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  54. Re:WHAT GRIPES YOU ABOUT SLASHDOT? by baloogan · · Score: 0

    offtopic: Yes, but we love slashdot anyway! :D anyone have more links to pics? :)

  55. yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating cat by pigfukr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    that "deep" gal has a gross gut.

    toss her some sit ups and she might be adequate.

    you guys need some standards.

    --
    pigfukr
  56. You should make a website about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, I'm curious to know the whole story.

    1. Re:You should make a website about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found this, looks like the same guy

  57. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by elmegil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some people like women who actually feel like women rather than skeletons. Her gut is not gross just because it's not anorexic. THIS is what a gross gut looks like. (warning, image is not for the faint of heart; it's no tubgirl, but you've been warned).

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  58. Cohoes?? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am just surprised that she lives that close to me! (Cohoes is a town just north of RPI, and about ten minutes down the road from Albany) I feel a bit too old for an 18-year-old geek model, though.

    Is it suddenly not acceptable for slashdotters to joke about the stereotypical single-34-year-old-living-in-mom's-basement image? Seems like I see a lot of posts on here along the lines of "hey, she's not so hot, I can do better than that!" No, you can't. That's why you're posting to slashdot. If you could, you'd be doing something else on a saturday night. :)

    I get the feeling that a lot of the people here complaining that she isn't so good looking have a hidden agenda - trash-talk the attractive girl, so the other geeks think you're fighting off women with a stick. It didn't work for me, I just assumed you took a break from the pr0n to read some slashdot. I for one think she's attractive, maybe not supermodel attractive, but if I saw her on the street I'd take notice. And she lives nearby so I might just see her on the street! Then I can be all like, hey, you're that girl from Aimster, and she'd be all like yeah, that's me baby, what's up, and I'd be all like nothin, what's up with you, wanna go out for a beer, and she'd be all like I can't, I'm only 18, and I'd be like hey, how about if I bought you some beer and we drank it over at my place, and stuff. (Sorry, I'm in the middle of moving, so I'm exhausted and all I have set up is my computer)

    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    1. Re:Cohoes?? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      I'll be the first to admit that I'm not fighting them off with a stick, but she really isn't that good looking. She's above average, but not stunning. Her face leaves a bit to be desired. Ack, I can't believe I'm dissecting this girl's looks. More proof I belong on slashdot I guess.

      --
      Why not fork?
    2. Re:Cohoes?? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1
      Is it suddenly not acceptable for slashdotters to joke about the stereotypical single-34-year-old-living-in-mom's-basement image? Seems like I see a lot of posts on here along the lines of "hey, she's not so hot, I can do better than that!" No, you can't. That's why you're posting to slashdot. If you could, you'd be doing something else on a saturday night. :)
      /me watches as his carefully crafted dream world where he isn't a total loser crumbles noisily around him.

      Why'd you have to go and do that, huh?
      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    3. Re:Cohoes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on man, RPI isn't that starved of attractive girls to make her worth looking at, especially in the last year or two. She is obviously a tool for her father and a fairly unattractive one at that.

    4. Re:Cohoes?? by macshit · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is that, at least in the photos linked to earlier in this story, she's posed in all these silly mullet-head cheesecake poses, which basically make anyone look pretty bad unless they have the cheesecake look -- which she doesn't.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    5. Re:Cohoes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get the feeling that a lot of the people here complaining that she isn't so good looking have a hidden agenda - trash-talk the attractive girl, so the other geeks think you're fighting off women with a stick.

      No, I've met her. She isn't very attractive, at least no more so than any other high school aged girl. The photographs you're seeing were taken with professional photographers and professional photoshoppers. And even THEY are not that great.

    6. Re:Cohoes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, cohoes is a hole in the ground

    7. Re:Cohoes?? by DWIM · · Score: 1
      I suspect that most of those who naysay her looks would be singing a different tune if they met her In Real Life (TM) and she actually seemed attracted to them.

      I expect most would be unable to stop slobbering over themselves.

    8. Re:Cohoes?? by linzeal · · Score: 1
      Um, have any of you dated a 18-19 year old chick lately, er for real? I am 25 almost 26 and after just about to get through a 2 week stint with a 19 year old I can say quite frankly, I'm pretty fucking tired of young chicks. The girl is still telling fantastic drug stories that eventually convoluted into her being an Indian's Daughter at my friend's place 2 nights ago. That's right a girl fresh out of wisco, told about 10 people that vaguely knew she was from wisco (if you were dense enough to miss the accent) that she was in actuality the daughter of one of the "peyote chiefs" of Arizona. That she knew the state like the back of her hand and was going to go down there and get a truck from her brother who lives on the reservation. . .etcetera. After her garrulous reinvention of her history, the host asked her if she had ever been to Organ Pipe National Park. She began talking, eventually it rounded out that she had spent summers there with some relative.

      "Why, Arizona"
      Repeat 20 times

      The room had for some time darkened with incredulity, I don't know who started laughing but she was so rightly heckled that I chuckled a bit too. She is moving out at the end of the month into her own place for the first time in her life. I'm helping her logistically get into college for the fall because she is not responsible enough to do her own paperwork, or even tell me the truth about simple matters.

      The whole meme that young chicks are more mature than their younger male counterparts is delusional. It does not mete out in my experiences; as of late, in a northern california college town with pry 20% of the population between 18-21. Anyone else care to comment?

  59. Obviously the work of an RIAA Mole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Naturally someone working for the RIAA would post things like this to discredit her.

  60. HE WORKED FOR THE COMPANY, MAYBE? by Ryvar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please note he mentions in his journal holding the source for the Mac version of Aimster/Madster hostage in PGP encrypted form because John Deep won't pay him? Is that a clue?

    Nevermind that Mr. Deep has been quoted several times here on Slashdot when Aimster/Madster finds itself in another lawsuit.

    Personally, I met the guy while working at their local CompUSA a few years back. He didn't seem like a tool (though his daughter looked like a cheap whore) but after reading Evro's journal (Evro would you do another update? Good read) I'm fairly convinced.

    1. Re:HE WORKED FOR THE COMPANY, MAYBE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mother fucker! you wouldnt fix my laptop you piece of shit compusa. you deserve to die in your own fecal dickhell.

      honor your warranties you arrogant ballmuncher.

  61. I'd hit it by Unregistered · · Score: 1

    byw, you shouldn't have posted anonymously. Being able to find lots of pics of hit girls is a GOOD trait, imo.

  62. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was strangely arroused by that picture.

  63. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by pigfukr · · Score: 1

    no, i hate those skeleton things.

    but hey, if you wanna spank over "unevenly fit girl", go ahead.

    --
    pigfukr
  64. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf cluster of THOSE!

  65. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you've provided 2 days worth of masturbation material for slashdotter everywhere.

  66. minutes?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    i was done in a few seconds..

  67. im probably going to get hacked for this comment.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but are we sure this isnt SDEM again?

  68. LOL dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks, the chewbacca thing, not the stupid Japanimation ref

  69. Highly attractive?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where does this guy live? In a desert island?

  70. Re:Calling all C programmers! by larry+bagina · · Score: 1
    Ok mod me offtopic, someone (offtopicly) wanted to know..

    gcc doesn't know what PATH_MAX is -- it could vary depending on which OS or kernel version you're using.

    Also, gcc uses a conservative approach to nagging -- assume you're an idiot for using a depracated function, rather than verifying if you're safely using a depracated function.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  71. A girls point of view by ahbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, Just for the record I am a happily married straight male. As I was browsing through the posts, most of them sound like a bunch of sex crazed 16 year old boys. Ok, this might be a long shot, but are there any girls who read slashdot? Ok stop laughting, I'm serious. I would like to know what the ladies of slashdot think of this Aimee Deep girl. Once you take away the tits, whats left?

    1. Re:A girls point of view by TI-83 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      a girl's reaction...

      From the interview and her website, she seems wicked shallow. Please excuse my geek-girl preconceptions, but I doubt she is all that geeky... offering kisses and posing in bikinis? Her opinions are not well-developed, either, or at least she doesn't take the opportunity of the interview to express them: "They're only like the greatest, coolest civil liberties group on the whole planet." (on the EFF) Also: would a geek willingly make themselves look stupid? She did't seem to listen to Mikael Pawlo's questions at all.

      Personally, I don't think I could find common ground with her.

      plus the "artist unbound" shit... that's just tacky. the repetition, that is.

      --
      &&stuff;
    2. Re:A girls point of view by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

      Once you take away the tits, whats left
      So much ! her ass, her slutty looks mmmmm....
      er em i am a male, just incase u mistake me for a lesbian.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    3. Re:A girls point of view by ramzak2k · · Score: 0

      you are just jealous
      Jealous that she looks better than you.
      Admit it. just kidding :)

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    4. Re:A girls point of view by Tsuzuki · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are quite a few girls who read slashdot... if you'd read the "girls in comp sci" thread quite a while back they were posting all the comments modded below 2. :P We're constantly reminded (and sorry) that there aren't that many geek girls in the public eye, then we're also reminded why there aren't that many. Ah well.

      Anyway, on the Ren and Stimpy single "Happy Happy Joy Joy", there was an interview with the whole universe's favourite cat and dog made for radio - there were silences where the announcer could insert a pertinent question, then play back the answers. That is kind of what this interview feels like. Wheee, she can blog. She probably didn't even set up Movable Type herself! Argh! 14-year-old AOL kiddies with domain names probably know better!

      (I really thought she was older when she was on the front of the Aimster site, but whatever floats your boat I guess.)

    5. Re:A girls point of view by Charmeine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would also like to know how many girls post to Slashdot, just curious - but doesn't seem like many? Hmm. Girls, please let me know.

      I cannot form an opinion of Aimee because I don't think it fair to base an opinion of someone on O/L stuff.

      The interview was no-brained but as people have said, it was prolly a marketing ploy.

      The piccy on musicpundit did not seem attractive to me. The ones posted by Anonymous Coward (you coward! tsk!) were nicer.

      And (threads above)it's a bit brutal to slag off girls that are naturally skinny. You are how you are.

      As for taking away the tits and what's left? Well, that depends on the girl. She will eventually be shown to have a brain or not, so that remains to be seen. And taking away her tits won't make her a man.

      16 year old males on Slashdot? Surely not! But if they liked the piccys that much (and I do wonder why) who's to begrudge them the thrill?

      Charmeine

    6. Re:A girls point of view by stanwirth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would like to know what the ladies of slashdot think of this Aimee Deep girl.

      Well, since you asked...

      Being a teenaged girl does NOT let her off the hook. You are a combination of what you do and how you communicate it.

      Aimee Deep is clearly just a "scene whore." Big deal. She'll probably grow up to be one of those women "in IT" who've never written a line of code in their lives. Typical.

      When I was her age, I:

      • had already been accepted to several top engineering schools
      • was already attending Cornell's College of Engineering (not far from Cohoes)
      • was already working as a programmer on campus
      • had already completed a semester of undergraduate CS
      • had been programming in high school computer club for several years. That's programming, not surfing.

      My neighbor has 2 daughters. The younger has an IQ of 160, and builds and programmes Lego Mindstorms with Linx/esterel, and the older programmes in PERL under linux and is training to be an airplane pilot. They're 12 and 16, respectively.

      Its just plain wrong that all of their accomplishments will only subject them to comparison with a stupid girl like Aimee Deep, "yes, maybe she can programme, but how does she look in a bikini."

      For crissakes, we train as programmers, airplane pilots, engineers so that our work can be objectively judged on its merits, not on the exposure of our breasts! If we wanted to be judged on our breasts, we would have gone into fields where there are no objective measures beyond "36-24-36".

      Touting a stupid girl like Aimee Deep as a "geek girl" creates a situation where women who are highly trained, highly educated, and have decades of technical experience-- get lumped in with the stupid little girls in the line-up. With an undergraduate degree in engineering, a Ph.D in physics and 25 years of professional programming experience, I still have to fight the "oh, look she knows what all these big words mean, maybe she can write our documentation for us, and hey joe, are you getting any off of her, nudge nudge, wink wink" attitude.

      Quite frankly, I'm utterly disgusted at Aimee's father's putting her up as a cheesecake scene whore and then trying to claim she's some kind of "geek girl" when she's anything but. The interview only reveals her stupidity.

      If she were a brilliant programmer, engineer, pilot, physicist, musician, artist, whatever, and happened to be stunningly beautiful, it would be like, "well... maybe her looks have helped her get ahead, but how is that different than a tall guy with a gorgeous voice and beautiful manners using his personal attributes to help sell his software?" There's lots of good software out there, but something has to work and something has to have been created . This gal claims to be creative , but is she making the music ? No. Is she writing the software? No.

      Unfortunately, Aimee Deep is pretty ordinary in the looks department, none too bright, and definitely not accomplished in anything useful or creating anything worthwhile. At best, she's a cheerleader for EFF. yawn!

      Truly pathetic.

    7. Re:A girls point of view by Charmeine · · Score: 1

      I'll go and look for the 'girls in comp sci' thread. I've always been fond of Ren & Stimpy, I never heard of that single though. I also thought this girl looked much older than 18, she must have had a big paper round. Anyhow, Happy Happy, Joy Joy. Charmeine

    8. Re:A girls point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know giving your kids IQ tests and making them spend their whole childhood on academic pursuits is just as pathetic as making your kid dress up sexy and show off.

      It's the same thing really.

      Some people flaunt the numbers "36-24-36" other fluant "IQ of 160" either way your are stil trying to show off and live through your children.

      Both are pathetic.

    9. Re:A girls point of view by Anitra · · Score: 1

      If I had points, I'd mod you up. Instead, you've just been added to my friends list.

      I used to be one of the hangers-on of the geek crowd, but as more of a little sister, less of a sex symbol (thankfully). About two years ago, I looked around and asked myself why I wasn't at least learning HOW to program instead of watching my friends fool around with computers. About a year and a half ago, I became a CS major; I'm now two classes away from my B.S., and plan to go on and do more research in grad school (eventually).

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    10. Re:A girls point of view by TI-83 · · Score: 1

      but red mohawks are sooo hotter than white bikinis...

      --
      &&stuff;
    11. Re:A girls point of view by shaitand · · Score: 1

      especially since 160 isn't very impressive in one so young... they are scored on a different scale.

    12. Re:A girls point of view by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Call me picky, but I prefer a woman with a brain AND a body. Either or is not good enough for me, and I consider both equally important.

      Things really are a bit different for men than they are for women. I can't speak for anyone else, but for me, a woman will have to be beautiful before she can get her foot in the door... but once that foot is in, then I most definately begin evaluating the mind.

      A woman using her body as another tool in her arsenal does not neccesarily indicate she is not intelligent. Actually a woman who can and doesn't is actually quite ridiculous. Slut when refering to a female is no more derogatory than refering to a man. Judging someone based on their level of sexual expression and liberation is crude and ridiculous, this is only accurate for determining their level of sexual freedom, nothing more and nothing less.

    13. Re:A girls point of view by stanwirth · · Score: 1

      A woman using her body as another tool in her arsenal does not neccesarily indicate she is not intelligent. Actually a woman who can and doesn't is actually quite ridiculous.

      In the spirit of respectful debate, allow me to offer a different perspective. We may have to agree to disagree, which is fine.

      First of all, the topic isn't what you want in a personal relationship. The topic is to what extent a female scientist, engineer, software developer, artist, musician -- professions in which there is a tangible, concrete product to design, create and deliver -- can or should be "using their bodies" to "get ahead".

      What does it say about the quality of the product and the intelligence and integrity of the people behind it when your highly experienced, highly trained technical consultant has to literally get her dress up over her head in order to close the sale? " Wow man, that is just soooo lame!" in the parlance of our little friend Aimee. "Simply unprofessional," is how an adult might put it.

      If your only criteria for success is how far ahead a person gets or next month's bottom line, then sure, why shouldn't she hand out BJs with the RFCs, RFPs and SLAs. OTOH, if your criterion for success is to build a solid reputation for your profession, for your firm, and for yourself, then what looks "ridiculous" are the cheap and sleazy tactics your competitors will stoop to.

      So, while I agree with you that being well-presented or even stunningly beautiful is a terrific asset, being cheap and sleazy is not.

      Ask yourself: do you respect aimster/madster more or less for the founder's putting his underaged daughter in a bikini up on his company's website? Sure, it may attract attention in the consumer market, and they may get some short-term mileage out of it.

      However, if you were a CIO or one of the Joint Cheifs, would you commission the company behind it --Johnny Deep's -- to develop a military comms system or a corporate procurement system based on the underlying technology they developed with aimster? Would you want miss Aimee directing the project? Hmmm? Probably not.

      The technology is there, but Aimee doesn't really understand it. And what's a girl with her level of personal and professional integrity going to do with your classified or proprietary system if someone offers her money for it? What will her price be, if all's it takes is a bit of attention on the internet to get her to take off her clothes? Look at her goals and values. She said it herself: "it's all about ME" Completely self-centered. It's how she was raised, and who raised her.

      Look at the quality of aimster's business relationships, and relationships with its employees. In the toilet! Don't you think that has something to do with the kind of people running the company? You know, the same kind of people that would put a picture of their own teenage daughter half-naked up on their website to promote their product.

      She can choose to go along with it, or she can choose not to. I would have a lot more respect for her if she at least understood the technology behind aimster's products (she dodged a question about that in the interview). But you,

      And the "using her body" bit that you suggest -- let's see if I can find something positive in it. HIV positive, maybe.

      On balance, it's unhealthful, it's deplorable and it's unprofessional. Any female scientist, engineer, software developer, artist, mathematician, musician who feels she has to do things like that to "get ahead" is truly, truly pathetic. A real lamer, whether she's any good at what she does or not. If she's good her chosen profession, she shouldn't have to engage in the oldest profession.

    14. Re:A girls point of view by stanwirth · · Score: 1

      Some people flaunt the numbers "36-24-36" other fluant "IQ of 160" either way your are stil trying to show off and live through your children.

      1. They're not my kids, they're my neighbors' kids. And, being so bright, they're quite interesting young people.
      2. What you choose to promote, and what you choose to deplore is literally what makes you a unique human being.

      You can choose what you want. You can even choose to remain ignorant of your own capability for discernment. That's your choice.

      I choose to promote girls and womens' education and accomplishments, particularly in science, engineering, software development and mathematics.

      I choose to deplore things that cheapen or degrade those accomplishments. One of those things is Aimee Deep's interview, which reveals her self-absorbed attitude, her unprincipled upbringing, and her lack of knowledge of the technology and her misrepresentation as a "geek girl"

    15. Re:A girls point of view by shaitand · · Score: 1

      " However, if you were a CIO or one of the Joint Cheifs, would you commission the company behind it --Johnny Deep's -- to develop a military comms system or a corporate procurement system based on the underlying technology they developed with aimster?"

      This would have no impact on my decision, it's no more or less ridiculous than any other marketing ploy I've seen. But with the right tatics applied properly Aimee may just break a tie.

      As for her running the company... alright I'll give ya that one, her answers, or lack thereof do tend to give me the impression she is a ditz. But note her answers are the only factor here in that conclusion, the images and modeling she has done is NOT a factor.

  72. hard UP by elizalovesmike · · Score: 1

    Jeez... You fellas need to get out more...

    She has a nice body but she's not all that attractive.

    Ahh, it's the anything-with-tits crowd...

    --
    Those who give up their power willingly deserve none.
  73. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by Feztaa · · Score: 1

    you guys need some standards.

    This, from a guy who fucks pigs? :)

  74. Hah! by Ryvar · · Score: 1

    You don't know the half of that place. Unbelievable hellhole full of absolute morons or a few trapped college CS undergrads scrambling like hell to get out- the only nice thing was that as someone with some BSD admin experience I got job offers from nearly every local ISP CEO/CTO who walked through the store. Monster.com and the want-ads don't have a thing on a good twenty minute geek discussion - it's like a job interview where you actually form a sort of bond with the interviewer, and that's an insidious thing.

    Honor the warrantie? PLEASE. Those fucking warranties are about one thing: taking extra money from your pocket and putting a small fraction of it in the salesman's - on Sundays the store manager often offers triple bonuses. One of our better guys pulled off a 6-computer order the top warranties on each on such a Sunday, that's $300 bonus on his next $500 paycheck right there.

    --Ryv

  75. Geek Girl? No. Airhead? Maybe. by mckayc · · Score: 1
    That interview made me want to hurl. Here's a choice quote:
    Madeline: There is always a moral issue in every decision I make. But I try - very hard - to make the least worst choice in an imperfect world.
    *puke*
  76. the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
  77. None of you would kick her out of bed. by Selecter · · Score: 1

    The first thing outa everyones mouth is how she's not really all that attractive. BULLSHIT. There's not a straight male reader of /. that would kick her out of your bed if she jumped in it. Thats the truth. All you other freaks talking smack about her are bullshitters. She's damn nice looking, there are better and worse, but she's attractive, stupid comments not withstanding.

  78. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL...

  79. Re:Geek Girl? No. Airhead? Maybe. by m1chael · · Score: 1

    when has that stopped anyone? like whatever dude...

    later!

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  80. Re:Got a chip on our shoulder, do we? by Arker · · Score: 1

    I will humbly submit that if you think she's 'paunchy' your sexual tastes would be better fulfilled if you look for young boys. And I want to be clear I'm not saying that to be insulting or anything - it's no skin off my butt if you like little boys, it's your choice. But if you want a woman that looks like a little boy you're going to be damn disappointed. Even the very few that look that way at 18 will fill out a few years later.

    For a female, she's actually pretty damn svelt. Those models you see are deliberately chosen to look like little boys, you know. Not one woman in 10,000 looks like that naturally, even at 18.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  81. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up, Malda.

  82. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that WAS a Beowolf cluster of those

  83. This is the English translation... by ites · · Score: 2

    LawGeek writes "Aimee Deep is probably most famously known as the face that demonstrated that geeks are easily manipulated by a sweet smile and the promise of a pair of tits. It says here that I'm supposed to call her "highly attractive", and that's fine, cause I've had a few, and goddam, even my cat is starting to make eyes at me. Anyhow, back to the quote whoring. Since being exploited by her obnoxious dad (boy, do I hate that bastard) as a cheap and nasty (can I say "nasty"? I mean, she's actually quite sweet, especially when she does that "can I sit on your lap and get a lolipop thing") cover girl for his cheap and nasty Napster knockoff business. He keeps telling me some big corporation is going to buy his company for billions. Damn, where was I. Oh, yeah... Since being exploited from the underage of 16 as a face for her dad's corrupt and tortured business dealings, lots of geeks seem to have gotten the hots for her. Something to do with her pics appearing on a.b.p.teen, maybe. So, we've decided it's time to give her a brain as well as tits, and we've now invented an "interview" (haha!) with my old buddy Mikael Pawlo, who will do anything for a couple of gins and a quick one behind the bar. Oh shit, can I delete that? Anyhow, he "interviewed" the girl, which took about five seconds. "Maddy," he said, "Is your dad home?" "Uh, dunno, lemme see... yeah". "Right, get the fuck off the phone and let me talk to him!". "Hey, you don't have to talk to me like that, you motherfuck, I'm famous!" "Yeah, whatever, just pass him to me"...

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  84. YOU = TEH DEPRACATED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 'deprecated', cuntwipe. Have you ever even seen a college?

  85. She had Me at Madeleine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # What happened to Madeleine?

    Madeline Aimee Deep -- I was 15 when Aimster first came out. I may look different, but I still feel the same on the inside.


    Oh, sweet Jebus.

  86. A First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has to be the first time no one has had to post "RTFA" in the responses to a topic on slashdot. Gee, how did that happen?

    But then, maybe the appropriate response in this case would be LATFP (Look At The F*ing Picture).

  87. i love this article by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

    Slashdot is complete today as a news service for nerds!
    I suggest next interview with pamela anderson & natalie portman on EFF, Filesharing and MPAA pls.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  88. gross by prell · · Score: 1
    Aimee Deep is probably most famously known as the highly attractive cover-girl of Madster (formerly known as Aimster). Since being involved with Madster (her father's business), she has had the opportunity to become more interested in legal and business issues surrounding the music distribution business and now blogs on the subject.

    Her father took / used revealing photos of her for his product? That's disgusting. I was simply rolling my eyes, before, that she gets to sit for interviews because she doesn't eat and shows herself off, but now I'm creeped out.
    1. Re:gross by clonebarkins · · Score: 1
      Her father took / used revealing photos of her for his product?

      No, the photo on the Madster website is not revealing in any way. The photo on her blog, however.... yum!!! That's her site, though, not her dad's. I'm saying, "Give me more!"

      Also, she's 18 dude -- old enough to do things for herself.

      --

      "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." -- Ayn Rand

  89. Re:Got a chip on our shoulder, do we? by User+956 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I will humbly submit that if you think she's "pretty damn svelt" (sic), your sexual tastes would be better fulfilled if you visit a farm and pick up on some heifers. And I want to be clear I'm not saying that to be insulting or anything - it's no skin off my butt if you're turned on by fat chicks, it's your choice. But if you want a woman that won't lose the TV remote in her flabby folds, you're going to be damn disappointed. Even the very few that look "svelt" (sic) to you at 18 will fill out a few years later.

    For a female, she's actually pretty damn chunky. Those women you prefer deliberately eat 4, 5, sometimes 6 meals a day. Not one woman in 10,000 looks like that naturally, even at 18. It takes a lot of fried chicken and Doritos to keep up a figure like that.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  90. Re:Got a chip on our shoulder, do we? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    If she's going to market herself as a sex-symbol, then she should *be* a sex symbol, not a paunchy chick in a thong that looks like she ate the chick that's _supposed_ to be in the picture.

    At least she won't pass out during sex. She's obviously healthy. Actually, she looks like she might still be a little under-weight, but not dangerously so. You obviously want her to risk her life at a dangerously low weight just so you can get your rocks off with a picture.

    Asshole, women are people, NOT sex objects. I could give a flying rat-fuck how she markets herself, she's still not a sex object. A sex object is something you pay $19.99 with a credit card to have delivered at your door step in an opaque box. There ain't no picture worth starving yourself for, and no man worth it either.

    I'll bet she takes better care of herself than you do. How much do YOU weigh? Is it healthy? Or are you a fat pig that's gonna die of a heart attack before the age of 40? Worse yet, are you one of those skeletons that pukes after every meal?

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  91. Re:Got a chip on our shoulder, do we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could give a flying rat-fuck how she markets herself, she's still not a sex object. A sex object is something you pay $19.99 with a credit card to have delivered at your door step in an opaque box.

    I don't see the phrase 'sex object' anywhere but in your post. Perhaps you should learn to read before criticizing others. kthxbye.

  92. uh mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    loser moderators, mod this up. this is actually the most insightful comment here for you dumb geeks.

  93. yeah but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how tall is she in cubits?????

  94. A Quip by RoninM · · Score: 2, Funny

    Says she, "I may look different, but I still feel the same on the inside." To which I say: I'll be the judge of that.

    --
    If a corporation is a personhood, is owning stock slavery?
  95. By any chance... by comet_11 · · Score: 1

    is the company in question NAMBLA?

    --
    By reading this comment, you immediately waive any and all rights regarding it.
  96. I WANT TO FUCK HER UNTIL MY PENIS FALLS OFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh yes!

  97. Beavis? by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Yes... I have a good friend like that... he's looking for a job too!

    http://www.paulfranz.com/

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  98. give the girl a break by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    you can hire perfect 10's with much lower morals to do this stuff.

    Which stuff, looking hot, or writing about file sharing? I think the point of this being on slashdot is that she's not just hot; she actually has some informed opinions. Yeah, 18-year-old opinions, to be sure, not all that well thought out, but entertaining to read... She's asked, how can we help your cause; she answers, "Donate to the EFF. Take me shopping."

  99. Somebody interviewed Ms. Deep? by Danj2k · · Score: 1

    Somebody interviewed Ms. Deep? Gee, I guess I better Read Or Die...

  100. doubting her intelligence? by Bodrius · · Score: 1

    I can't say honestly that I know whether she is a "brainless twit" or a genius, but that interview taken literally would be reason enough to doubt her intelligence, knowledge, and/or honesty.

    However, I don't where the first, or even the second, has been called into question. If she were coached or even impersonated for the interview wouldn't have much to do with her intelligence, I think.

    It does read like something written by some outsider tying to appeal to the "cool young kids". It's full of platitudes, sprinkled with attempts at pseudointellectuality through name-dropping. The kind of smalltalk that wouldn't survive a casual encounter, much less an actual interview, but is the core of a successful publicity stunt.

    It's reads and feels like a marketing piece, like one of those info-mercials with testimonials at 3AM, only with an MTV attitude. If it were an honest and direct interview it would mean she is as shallow as the paid hip voices of Big Media are paid to be, or that she was edited to look that way by the publication.

    I prefer to give her the benefit of the doubt and assume she is willingly and intelligently doing her job: this is an ad, and either she playing her role as the shallow image of the young, hip, Madster user, or (if the interview was online) that she's letting the marketing people use her image as for any other ad.

    Either way, she could be a very intelligent and professional young woman and this could still all be a manufactured interview. Considering what her job is, what the interview is about, and the actual content this seems the most likely intepretation.

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
  101. Skinny women are for FAGS by ccmay · · Score: 1
    For a female, she's actually pretty damn chunky.

    Bull-fucking-shit. She's perfect, and anyone who says otherwise has bought into the perverted ideal of feminine "fashion" where women are supposed to look like fourteen-year-old boys.

    Reject the tyranny of homosexual fashion designers and magazine art directors. They are all filthy pedophile perverts. Accept women for how they ought to be.

    The worst oppressors of women are faggots sucking shit off their boyfriends' cocks.

    -ccm

    --
    Too much Law; not enough Order.
    1. Re:Skinny women are for FAGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was unaware of homosexuals enjoying skinny women or consuming feces.

  102. Lowers the tone by LordK2002 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    My support for the RIAA just rocketed.

    Sorry, but I cannot be the only one that finds the use of clueless bikini-clad teenagers to sell an important issue rather a turn-off.

    K

    1. Re:Lowers the tone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shut up!
      If it weren't for te promis of clueless bikine-clad teenagers, the internet wouldn't be near what it is today.

  103. What I want to know by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is how this ties into "my rights online"?

  104. $1250 a week!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a decent wage, why are you so spiteful? Didn't you save to pay your rent?

    1. Re:$1250 a week!? by smkndrkn · · Score: 1

      1250 a week before taxes in that tax bracket with more than one mouth to feed and the high cost of just "getting by" make that much money not that much in reality. I make a bit more than that and I have threee dependants. I'm taxed pretty heavily, I don't own a home, after state and federal taxes and my bills (including gas diapers etc) there isn't a whole lot left over to save with. I think it really depends on your location and how many people you have to support with those dollars. If you make that salary in Kentucky you can probably live very nicely. In the New England area its really tough to live on that kind of money unless your willing to drive over an hour away from the big cities (assuming you work in them).

      Now all that being said...it really doesn't matter if he saved...he was screwed out of $7500. So even if he spent all his money buying hookers and toy Evils dolls its still moot since the point is that he was lied to and screwed with and at the end of it all he didn't even get paid.

      --
      ======== In the future, everything will be artificial. ========
  105. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up.


    Faggot.

  106. Re:Er... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Missed the AC/DC reference:
    "Ain't no famous story.
    Ain't no skin 'n' bone.
    But she give it all she got,
    Weighin' in at 19 stone..."
    --Whole Lotta Rosie: Dirty Deeds, Done Dirt Cheap

    Don't scales in the UK still use stoneweight?

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  107. Re:Damnit, it's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and when she finds that stuff, it's not spying, like it was when you found the new love letters from an old boyfriend on her computer. and much worse, since you were spanking it and all she was gonna do was leave you for a latent fantasy.
    Wimmen suck, thank god.

  108. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by stor · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find it slightly amusing that "pigfukr" is telling us we need some standards?

    Cheers
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  109. Re:Funny you bring it up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah he should have spent that time in UK and USSR smoking dope after getting exempted from the war - opps I guess a different president already did that - thanks Bubba

  110. well this worked. by m1chael · · Score: 1

    it made itself on slashdot and know i know what madster is. thanks alot slashdot, im just that much better off now.

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  111. I want my bits back by lophophore · · Score: 2

    This article is pure drivel. I want my time, and my computer is so offended it is asking for the bits back. Who really gives a shit about some criminal and his slutty daughter. It must be a really slow news day for Slashdot.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
  112. Aimee... by stor · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's short for Madeleine...

    ?

    Reminds me of the ol' Blackadder Episode:

    "Jane. That's a funny name for a man..."
    "It's short for... Bob"

    Cheers
    Stor

    --
    "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  113. P2P user neither thief nor felon, moron by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    it's called copyright infringement and it is a civil matter, not a criminal matter. you serve prison time for felons. you pay fines for copyright infringement.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:P2P user neither thief nor felon, moron by palme999 · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. I suggest you read this:

      http://www.cybercrime.gov/18usc2319.htm

      (b) Any person who commits an offense under section 506(a)(1) of title 17--

      (1) shall be imprisoned not more than 5 years, or fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if the offense consists of the reproduction or distribution, including by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of at least 10 copies or phonorecords, of 1 or more copyrighted works, which have a total retail value of more than $2,500;

      And check here:

      http://www.cybercrime.gov/ipcases.htm

      For the list of people who definately now understand it is a criminal matter.

  114. Is she real? by Azathoth!EDC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What nobody seems to have pointed out are that the two images of "Aimee Deep" - one on Madster.com, and one on MusicPundit.com - don't look like the same person!

    Exhibit A

    Exhibit B

    1. Re:Is she real? by PurplePhase · · Score: 1

      They're 2 different file formats, *of course* they're not going to look the same.

      What, you say you're not viewing them with a hex editor?

      8-PP

  115. Re:Got a chip on our shoulder, do we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For a female, she's actually pretty damn svelt."

    I dunno. The American view* of "healthy" women is exactly that--the American view. Japanese and Filipino women, for instance, do not starve themselves, yet they make American women look rather chunky, even when compared to American women of Japanese and Filipino ethnicity (same generally goes for men). As a result of our unprecedented prosperity and rather poor dietary habits, we Americans are the fattest people ever.

    That said, I don't think that she need to be skinnier, just perhaps have better muscle tone**. There is a difference between skinny and fit. The definition of svelte generally requires a person to be both. More literally, it requires the person's form to be composed primarily of clean, sleek lines. Aimee may be healthy, but she isn't svelte.

    *Disclaimer: I'm a US citizen, though I live in Hawaii, which is far more culturally diverse than the continental US.

    **My criticism is based on a woman with healthy dietary habits and regular exercise (a tan would also be nice, but then again, we take those for granted here ;)).

  116. hahah. highly attractive my ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh.. If she's "highly attractive", you really need to get out more.

  117. gross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude. Gross. Do ANY of you get outside anymore?

    She's too chubby.
    She's too blonde.
    She's too skanky.
    Her face has kind of an odd shape.
    Not to mention that most of those pictures you see around of her were probably taken when she was UNDER AGE.

    Just.. EEW.. screw that...

  118. the metamorphosis is nearly complete by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    All that needs to happen for Slashdot to become Fark is to have posted this story under the heading "Boobies."

  119. That's not gcc giving you the error... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ld. Certain functions (gets, getwd, tmpnam, and so on) are marked in glibc as being dangerous.

  120. She may indeed by selfdiscipline · · Score: 1

    ... have a brain, but that's not what she's out to display for marketing purposes. She really didn't say anything too insightful in that interview. Anyone from her (and my) generation can talk about the evils of the big media and their approach to copyright.

    --


    -------
    Incite and flee.
  121. Some reasons that might happen by donscarletti · · Score: 1
    What about a guy who has a girlfriend or wife (possibly hotter than the girl in question or possibly not) and values his relationship with her.

    Or maybe its a slashdot reader that has beliefs that conflict with promiscuity.

    Or the more likley, she jumps into a guys bed and he thinks GREAT! I am gunna get some sweet lovin' from a girl that may or may not be attractive but is definantly not hideous. Then she informs him that he is not getting anything, so the guy wants to go to bed and have some sleep, but NO! He can't because she is there.

    Or maybe that guy is Bill Gates or Steve Balmer or something and he knows that this is just a ploy by her so she can castrate him.

    And the punchline is...... This is because he knows that since MS is against the use of UNIX it would be ironic if it was run by one. *ducks flying fruit*

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  122. Fame vs Notoriety by Speare · · Score: 1

    A Mistaken Identity

    Fame, as she walked at evening in a city, saw the painted face of Notoriety flaunting beneath a gas-lamp, and many kneeled unto her in the dirt of the road.

    "Who are you?" Fame said to her.

    "I am Fame," said Notoriety.

    Then Fame stole softly away so that noone knew she had gone.

    And Notoriety presently went forth and all her worshippers rose and followed after, and she led them, as was most meet, to her native Pit.

    --Lord Dunsany, in "The Food of Death; fifty-one tales."

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  123. Brings new meaning to the word 'Enter-View' by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    What more is there to say :)

    Just what the world needs, another law-student.. blah.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  124. paypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After so many geeks wanted to chip in and buy the aircraft carrier, I am amazed there isn't an effort to raise the funds to hire this girl for some more exotic "promotional" photos. That's something that's probably doable, and she *is* 18 now........

  125. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by Doomrat · · Score: 1
    >it's no tubgirl, but you've been warned

    It's tubbygirls.

  126. Re:Got a chip on our shoulder, do we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Women are people AND sex objects. Heterosexual men often think sexual thoughts of women, not in the abstract, but of particular women. It is a simple fact, and there is nothing wrong with it. Each person's thoughts are free. These thoughts give no rights to harass the women or to treat them unfairly. To claim that women are not sex object, however, is dishonest and/or stupid.

    I know many heterosexual women who think of men in similar terms.

    It is a matter of treating people fairly, not of whether people are sex objects.

  127. It's girls like that... by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    that make me wish I had mind control powers. I would so dominate...

    Oh, wait, I said that out loud. Well, call me a perv ('cuz I am), I guess.

  128. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by elmegil · · Score: 1

    How exactly is a pose where she's obviously pushing out her stomach "unevenly fit" anyway?

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  129. Lisa Faulkner by mgarraha · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...and the picture is a (nicely) doctored ripoff of this one from FHM.

    1. Re:Lisa Faulkner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but isn't that just what the Linux community does?

      Take something of quality someone else does...
      Copy it, and redo it, and call it their own...

    2. Re:Lisa Faulkner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they use the GIMP?

    3. Re:Lisa Faulkner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cant tell.

      The file does not cotain the "Created by the GIMP" comment

  130. Re:Got a chip on our shoulder, do we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Japanese and Filipino women, for instance, do not starve themselves, yet they make American women look rather chunky, even when compared to American women of Japanese and Filipino ethnicity (same generally goes for men).

    True, but it has to be said that the typical young Japanese or Filipino woman looks like a young boy.

    *Disclaimer: I'm a US citizen, though I live in Hawaii, which is far more culturally diverse than the continental US.

    You are so full of shit right here that it is coming out of the vents in my monitor. The continental US has every bit of the cultural diversity that you find in Hawaii and then some. I live in Alabama - not the cultural capital of the world - and in the last 10 years I have known Hawaiians, Filipinos, Japanese, Koreans, Iranians (or Persians as I was so often corrected), Morrocans, Sudanese, Native Americans, Indians, Israelis, Panamanians, Mexicans, Brazilians, Chinese, British, West Africans, well I think you get the picture. I can't imagine what it be like to live in a big city where there is some real diversity.

  131. I'll knock it down to $10 by Savatte · · Score: 1

    and throw in a free meal at Mild Wallys.

  132. FAT? COW? by Anitra · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What the hell is wrong with you? She looks like she's in pretty decent shape to me. A lot better than I was at 18, or even 15. I'm sorry that curves turn you off. I'm even more sorry that you help to perpetuate the idea that women have to starve themselves and work out obsessively to be beautiful.

    If you think she's a fat cow, I'd hate to know what you think about me. (I was 17-18 when these pictures were taken.)

    But if starved chicks are the only ones attractive to you, I guess you've been single for a while now, huh?

    --

    Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    1. Re:FAT? COW? by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Haha!

      I'd mod this up to make it more visible, but it's not my week, so I can't.

      For the record, you aren't fat .

      You have, on the other hand, a damn fine trombone.

      Thanks for pointing me to sllort's mod guide, though - I'll change my prefs to newest first directly, but still won't ever mod anyone down (I like to reward good posts, and launch a tirade against bad ones).

      Keep it real, girl!

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    2. Re:FAT? COW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're pretty cute in a geek chick kind of way. I can see myself still wanting to talk to and hold you long after your youthful looks have matured. But alas... my heart belongs to the sea.

    3. Re:FAT? COW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think she's a fat cow, I'd hate to know what you think about me. (I was 17-18 when these pictures were taken.)

      sproing!

      fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfa pfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap

      um, what were you saying? oh yeah, huh huh huh
      huh huh huh fat cow... yeah....

      (... damn lucky trombone...)

    4. Re:FAT? COW? by lpret · · Score: 1

      I think kin_korn_karn is from Somalia. That would explain a lot of things...

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    5. Re:FAT? COW? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      Gee, thanks.

      I wonder if you were serious about "my heart belongs to the sea".. because, incidentally, I love to sail. I used to be a Sea Scout, and I'm now a leader. I miss sailing this baby on Lake Ontario with the scouts.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    6. Re:FAT? COW? by Anitra · · Score: 1

      For the record, you aren't fat .

      Thanks. I used to think I was, but it's been quite a while since I truly believed I was "fat". It's more that I just have a big frame (5'9"ish), and I was/am pretty out-of-shape. But I don't measure my "in-shape-ness" or attractiveness by what size pants I wear ;)

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    7. Re:FAT? COW? by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      I think I'm now sure I know who you are *evil grin*. You had friends across the hall from me this year. You never stopped to say hello :P

      Anyway, congrats - you're the first person I actually have met in real life that I know on Slashdot. The others I've only met in Counter-Strike games at WPI... Dubious honor to be sure...

      (Ironically enough, when I did first meet you at WPI, the conversation at some point managed to go onto exactly this topic. Weird.)

      Er, anyway, you definitely are not fat. (Based not on the pictures but having actually met you in person.) I don't get this "super-model" attraction thing anyway - it's so much more satisfying to go for attraction to nice people :) I mean, I can understand wanting someone who doesn't look like me, but people attacking Aimee for having a gut is just cruel. Especially since based on the MusicPundit link, she doesn't have a gut as much as have abdominal muscles. Oh no.

      Oh, and how's Dark Cloud going? I still think the sequel is far better, although I've managed to get distracted onto other games and haven't bothered finishing it. (I wonder what it means that "other games" are Final Fantasy Origins, remakes of the NES Final Fantasy and Final Fantasy II...)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  133. She sounded like... by Anitra · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a teenage girl. Which is exactly what she is. No, she's definitely not a geek (sorry). She does seem to know a little bit more than her peers about copyright and the courts.. which is to say, not much. There's some intelligence there - whether it's hers or she was fed some answers, I can't tell. I hope she doesn't go into a career in modeling, especially if she does actually have some brains.

    Finding out that most of those pictures were taken while she was underage... all I can say is her dad must have serious problems to let her, nay encourage her, to do that.

    --

    Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    1. Re:She sounded like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's good breeding stock. I think she'd make a good mom.
      Hopefully she'll get married in a year or two, and squeeze out a few pups.

    2. Re:She sounded like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finding out that most of those pictures were taken while she was underage... all I can say is her dad must have serious problems to let her, nay encourage her, to do that.

      As if sexual maturity is a binary state - before some arbitrary age, probably choosen by old white men to begin with, kids are innocent and pure as the driven snow, and after that date they are sex machines just workin-it all the time.

      Dad may have some kink-issues wrt to Aimee here, but sexy photographs, in fully street legal clothing, is well within even American prudish values. Teenage girls working the modeling field do the same kind of thing everyday without turning into sexually-abused crack whores. Hell, plenty of teenage girls at school and the mall dress and act the same all the time too.

  134. Re:WHAT GRIPES YOU ABOUT SLASHDOT? by moncyb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    posters that say Slackware is better because "you have to compile all of the applications for yourself"

    Funny. Complile what? They don't even have any source code on the main disk--except for the kernel. Maybe you are confused by all the development packages. Oh no! Slackware allows one to write one's own programs and compile them too. Aaahhh! What a bunch of crazies!

    It's better than Mi$roCrap$, anything is.

  135. I'm Waiting For the Gene Simmons Interview by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    in Tongue Magazine with Aimee...

    Gene: So, Aimee, did you ever, you know, with another girl?

    Aimee: Only Sarah Deutsch...

    Gene: Right. And this thing about Lessig?

    Aimee: I love men with glasses.

    Gene: I hate it when that happens...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  136. I love the smell of pedantry in the morning. by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
    Qui custodiet ipsos custodes?

    Should be "quis," unless you actually mean to be saying, "What watches over the watchmen themselves?" which, now that I think of it, is a rather interesting question.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    1. Re:I love the smell of pedantry in the morning. by elmegil · · Score: 1

      I wish I could remember where I looked up the quote to correct them, but thanks, I'll fix mine :-)

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  137. Re:Why do so many women [answer] by SPK · · Score: 1
    because they can.

    end of story.

    --
    Regnant populi. (The people rule.) Pregnant ropuli. (The snake will soon lay eggs.)
  138. re:AC by Anitra · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the compliment.. I think...

    --

    Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
  139. 18 years old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at those pictures, I certainly can't shake the thought that she is NOT 18 years old. She looks more like 24. I've seen enough porn not to believe that "18 year-old" crap.

  140. Re:Got a chip on our shoulder, do we? by badman99 · · Score: 0

    Hmmm this is usually the argument really really ugly chicks and lesbians use. For fuck sake, I opened the door for the woman once who was obviously struggling as she had her arms full of books. Instead of saying thank you the bitch went off at me saying she could have handled it herself and didn't need a man to be helping her in any way. Reminds me of the time I got up off the seat in a train for a pregnant woman who also started rambling the same shit.

  141. Geek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this chick is a geek, then i'm brad fucking pitt.

  142. "Miss Deep"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Insert obligatory "Read or Die" joke here.

  143. Re:Got a chip on our shoulder, do we? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

    Hmmm this is usually the argument really really ugly chicks and lesbians use.

    Except that I'm a man with a pretty attractive wife. :) We've eliminated sexism in our house completely. She opens doors for me, I open them for her, and so forth. We have a 4-year-old daughter (and a son, and another one coming) to whom we intend not to teach sexism as a way of life. They'll learn about it sooner or later, but we want them to learn it as something "some people do", rather than "the way it is".

    For fuck sake, I opened the door for the woman once who was obviously struggling as she had her arms full of books. Instead of saying thank you the bitch went off at me saying she could have handled it herself and didn't need a man to be helping her in any way. Reminds me of the time I got up off the seat in a train for a pregnant woman who also started rambling the same shit.

    Man, fuck those women. I hate that shit. If you had opened the door for a man, would he have gone off on you? Probably not. He'd probly say thank you and go in the door. Would those same chicks have done the same if the tables were turned? (Obviously you wouldn't be pregnant with a woman offering you a seat on the bus... hmmm....) If the psycho lady who didn't like you opening the door for her would have opened the door for you if your arms were full, then who the fuck is she to bitch? Sorry, this stuff pisses me off. Pisses me off when it happens to me, pisses me off when it happens in general. It's obviously people not thinking. YOu should've kicked her ass. "Bitch, want to be equal? Then you can take an equal beating." Heh. It's amazing, to me, how many of these women shy away when you offer to smack 'em the same way you'd smack a man for the same shit. "I'm a woman, don't hit me!"

    Not that I think violence is a good thing, or anything, but in these cases a little fist-waving can be very revealing (and can get your ass kicked).

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  144. For 18, she sure knows a lot! by cenonce · · Score: 1

    Anybody notice that for 18, she sure knows a lot about Copyright law?

    No offense, I'm sure there are some smart 18 year olds out there, but the way "Aimee" speaks sounds more like her dad (or some other executive) was in fact interviewed. Sure, it has the obligatory "Oh m'Gods!" thrown in to make it sound like it's her, but as to the issues at hand, I know of no 18 year old who knows any more about copyright law other than "Ya mean, I can't just burn a copy of the new Eminen CD for all my friends!?!".

    While I appreciate any positive commentary on the abuse of the Act by the media entertainment, I'd expect more from GrepLaw as to whom they choose to interview.

    -A

  145. Re:yeeek! you guys would spank over a menstrating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    that "deep" gal has a gross gut. toss her some sit ups and she might be adequate. you guys need some standards.
    You sir, are as full of shit as a christmas goose. I'd nail that sweet ass so "Deep" she'd need a clawhammer to get up off the bed.
    To quote the esteemed Bowley and Wilson: "...I like a girl with some meat; keeps your nuts up off the sheet..."
  146. that is for more than just using P2P by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    That would be for circumventing digital copy protection, which P2P software does not do. P2P software, unless it uses some built-in DeCSS to descramble DVD on-the-fly, is not touching digital copy protection at all. It is illegally copying files, not circumventing access to those files.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  147. oops by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    I should have read your link before responding, I just assumed that you were linking to the DMCA.

    What you linked to is actually fairly interesting, however you actually highlighted reasons why P2P users are not guilty of this charge.

    distribution ... which have a total retail value of more than $2,500

    Those so-called "greedy" users which do not serve (i.e., distribute) the works are not included in this clause. In addition, at $0.99 per song retail value (several sites now offer this) that is 2500 songs in a 180-day period. Not a high percentage of the P2P users distribute 2500 songs in a 180-day period.

    The other half of Title 17, Chapter 5, Section 506 states the other way for copyright infringement to be criminal: for purposes of commercial advantage or private financial gain. Most P2P users are not selling these songs for profit.

    Also of importance is the following: evidence of reproduction or distribution of a copyrighted work, by itself, shall not be sufficient to establish willful infringement.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  148. *blink* by Magius_AR · · Score: 1

    The girl's last name is "DEEP"!
    For the love of God, run with it!
    Where are all you humor writers?
    That's GOLD!

  149. Miss Deep or DEEP THROAT! by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    HA HA! Man, she can't be 18, she's got to be some sort of paid spokersperson. She might as well be a pornstar and call her Aimee Deep(throat).

  150. personal reply by Anitra · · Score: 1

    Wish I could figure out who you are, then...

    You had friends across the hall from me this year. You never stopped to say hello

    Dude, I just finished my senior year. I have friends all over campus, ranging from freshman to super-duper-seniors. You're going to have to be a bit more specific...

    Er, anyway, you definitely are not fat. (Based not on the pictures...

    Never said I was. I'm just larger-than-average. :)

    Oh, and how's Dark Cloud going? I still think the sequel is far better...

    I haven't played Dark Cloud much since last summer. Haven't had time, with MQP and trying to graduate, and all. Haven't seen the sequel, though people speak highly of it. (relatively, anyway)

    My curiosity has gotten the better of me. Someone at WPI.. most likely male (duh, at WPI)... have spoken to him about female body-image issues, and has seen me play/spoken to me about Dark Cloud... Who are you???!! If you don't want to give up your identity, you could always email me.

    --

    Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    1. Re:personal reply by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      I don't really care - I doubt anyone else will read this thread anyway :) Anyway, now that my computer boots again...

      Yeah, I'm someone at WPI - I doubt my name'll help much - Dan Potter. I think you were playing Dark Cloud in Founders 315 or whatever (across from 312, where I was for C and D term this year). I don't have any pictures of myself (right now), and am too lazy to search for one (that doesn't look horrible).

      I don't remember everyone that was there, but several people were there end of D-term 2001, and somehow the topic of body image came up. Started at the pool tables, and moved to the fountain, if that helps.

      Then I wound up taking a year off (2002, actually - not enough money), and was back this year to see you play Dark Cloud :). Hopefully I'll be graduating 2004, assuming everything goes well.

      Hope that helps - if not, I'll get around to finding a picture or something...

      I'm just larger-than-average.

      I doubt that... if anything, I'd say average - I dunno, though (not having taken an exaustive survey or anything...)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  151. *Yawn* She's American, isn't she? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aussie women are usually more intelligent, and better in bed. I cannot stand American women, though I've never had a chance to date a woman from Manhattan.

  152. Her stupidity makes her unattractive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And no, I wouldn't kick the trollop out of my bed. I'd load a shotgun and give her a ten count.