Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Orange SPV Phone Review

Ian Bell writes "HowardChui.com just posted a review on Microsoft's new Orange SPV which is the first commercially available Smartphone. The SPV stands for Sound, Pictures, Video and you can download games like Doom or listen to MP3s on the speaker or even chat to your friends using the built-in MSN Messenger. But for all that the SPV features, there is no Bluetooth support. It still looks like a killer phone and I like that it is smaller than the PocketPC phones currently on the market."

237 comments

  1. Ad campaign? by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Can you hear me n..."

    Your phone has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down

    1. Re:Ad campaign? by jrl87 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your phone has performed an illegal operation and will be shut down

      This is assuming you agreed to the EULA which you agreed to by: openning the box, turning on the phone, and then clicking yes to the message that appears (if you click no, the phone becomes inopperatable). Then, after you accept the EULAs you must activate your phone with a carrier and Microsoft, failure to do this will cause your phone to be inopperatable whithin 30 days.

      We, Microsoft, reserve the right to use any media for advertising or other purposes that is and/or was on any phone that was activated ... if any of this media is pertaining to Microsoft in any way, shape, or phone, you will be subject to a unlawful usage lawsuit. See article Q!@#$you for further details.

    2. Re:Ad campaign? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      From the article: no J2ME

      Hello !?! Microsoft incorporating Java in one of its products without a 10 year lawsuit before hand!

      Over Bill's dead body!

    3. Re:Ad campaign? by seanthenerd · · Score: 1

      PHONESPV caused a general protection fault in module PHONESPV.EXE at 000b:00000168.
      Registers:
      EAX=00000000 CS=5ed7 EIP=00000168 EFLGS=00000282
      EBX=0000fdc0 SS=68cf ESP=0000629e EBP=0000fffe
      ECX=0000006b DS=68cf ESI=819b0001 FS=0000
      EDX=00000000 ES=0000 EDI=0000006e GS=0177
      Bytes at CS:EIP:
      cb 45 55 8b ec 81 ec 00 01 56 8d 86 00 ff 16 50
      Stack dump:
      68cf632e 056c0000 00000000 da44000a 68cf0002
      819b0000 0000006e 14cb817e 2abc2042 00004b48
      da440000 62e20000 173f50e8 30425355 00003130 da44000a

    4. Re:Ad campaign? by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Cool! It even has a blue LED backlighting!"

      "That's NOT blue LED backlighting, you dolt..."

    5. Re:Ad campaign? by mlk · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I read on the JDC that MS are going to be the first to bring out a MIDP2 phone..

      Hmmm, MIDP2.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    6. Re:Ad campaign? by beefness · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, I have had an orange SPV since it Launched in November and the phone works very well, it does lag occasioanlly, which can be very irritating, it also has a few quirks in terms of the navigation system (it just isn't very logical - sorry microsoft).

      However, it's audio quality is fantastic for such a small device, it was in fact the main reason I bought it, as for WAP? Why does anyone even comment on that any more, WAP is useless anyway. The SPV has regular internet access via GPRS, and that works perfectly (it shrinks the images and everything), much better than WAP.

      Before Microsoft issued the first software update for the SPV it was pretty clumsy, it's batteries just got sucked into a big black whole somwhere near the screen and it was missing some key functionality, for a start an app for taking and viewing a picture album with the supplied camera attachment - before the update you had to create an MMS message in order to access the camera functionality.

      I am very happy with the SPV and what it does, there is not another phone like it available on the market today and I like it because I can replace 2 devices that I always used to carry with me (my phone and my CD player) with 1 device that does what the other two did and a hell of alot more, as an early adopter of this product I am happy to live with the 2 second delay when I launch Windows Media Player if it means my pockets look less bulky.

      The SPVx is out in a month or two, which is going to be upgraded for better gaming features and hopefully will have a faster CPU, but I'll be happy with my SPV.

    7. Re:Ad campaign? by NoCoward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have one and unfortunately it is true. The good thing is that Orange issues patches that you can download over-the-air or on their web site which have increased the stability and speed tremendously!!!

      Its pretty cool that I can now what on my phone with MSN Messenger. There is even a Jabber client available that allows ICQ,MSN,AIM,etc.. at http://www.movsoftware.com/products/imov/smartphon e.htm

      There are a bunch of other cool products for it too. IA Album, etc...

  2. Well... by eightball01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Either the phone is small or his head is really big. Hard to tell.

    1. Re:Well... by pVoid · · Score: 1
      He's got a HUUUUuuuge head.

      I bet he cries himself to sleep on his HUUUuuuge pillow at night.

      (for the salivating Troll/Bameflait modders, do some research, it's called an inside joke).

    2. Re:Well... by vurg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, Howard does that all the time not to be popular. He's already popular (go to www.howardforums.com) and he's a regular in phone conventions and stuff.

    3. Re:Well... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      Look at the size of that boy's heed!

  3. Better buttons please by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was deriding the Yopy a couple days ago for having a chiclet keyboard. This thing's got a chiclet keypad. Make it bigger!

    Add to that the fact that you're going to get face-grease all over the screen every time you talk on the phone. I don't see any reason to get one of these yet.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Better buttons please by silmarildur · · Score: 1

      as little respect as i have for microsoft I am not quite sure it makes sense to blame them for ones own facial excretions.

      --
      -Silmarildur
    2. Re:Better buttons please by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Maybe not directly, but if you don't believe they are working behind the scenes to exacerbate face grease, then you haven't been watching their slow accumulation of P&G stock.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    3. Re:Better buttons please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, the keypad on the SPV is terrible. This was fixed, however, on the 2nd iteration of the device -- the Tanager (or SPVx or QTek 7070 depending on who's selling it.) One of many pictures of the new device: http://www.infosyncworld.com/news/n/3639.html

  4. It should be the DRMSDRMPDRMV phone by corebreech · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or does anyone here believe the sound, pictures and video won't be slathered with DRM bloat?

    1. Re:It should be the DRMSDRMPDRMV phone by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Yes, it won't be. But I can't tell you why I know.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    2. Re:It should be the DRMSDRMPDRMV phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why the hell did this get modded up? A quick Google search will reveal the inner workings of the SmartPhone OS. DRM will only be on __protected__ WMV content. There was code signing for program code but Orange disabled that after customers complained. The parent should be modded as flamebait. Nice going mods; mod up someone who spews shit out of his mouth.

    3. Re:It should be the DRMSDRMPDRMV phone by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      keyboard, surely?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  5. Must be a MS powered phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Must be a MS powered phone you have there, it was a little slow on the processing.

  6. Poor Audio? What's the point then? by orthancstone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guy says in the review that the audio isn't that great, thus flushing the functionality of mp3 playing and making its usefulness as a cell phone kinda crappy.

    That's a shame too because it looks like an nice phone and has some decent feature.

  7. Apple should make one! by seanthenerd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I believe, as an Apple fan, that Apple should make a really good phone for all us geeks wishing we had big wallets. They could get Jonathan Ive to do it, and put a *scaled-down* version of OS X on it. Plus, they could call it the iPhone! (It has a *ring* to it, yuk yuk...) I would definitely buy one (if I had said big wallet).

    1. Re:Apple should make one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Over Steve Jobs Dead body...
      http://www.arstechnica.com/archive/news/1 050185127 .html

    2. Re:Apple should make one! by gotr00t · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Usually, Apple couples a service with each of their products, like the iPod has the music store service, and their Mac G4/iMac/eMac computers all have the .Mac service avaliable to them. It would be unlike Apple to make a new phone without making a service for it or something. Though it would be very nice to see them try to make one, it would look schweet indeed.

      I doubt, however, that OSX can possibly be scaled down to the cell phone level, as it appears unlikely due to the heavy system requirements, and lack of flexability, versus Linux, which can be scaled up or down easily.

      Moreover, I think that a catchier name would be iTalk, or iDial (as opposed to iPhone, which sounds a bit cliched), something that describes an attribute of the product instead of the product itself. If they just blantently named everything by it's name, then you'd end up with products like iComputer or iAAC/MP3player.

    3. Re:Apple should make one! by mlk · · Score: 1

      IT would work well with both .mac and iTunes, esp. if the "iPhone" could take iTunes as ringtones.

      And it would look sweet. ;)

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  8. Pros vs. Cons by ELCarlsson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look at all the Pros. None of that makes a good phone. Who cares about a customizable today screen or an optional keyboard when the phone sucks.

    1. Re:Pros vs. Cons by jrl87 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am interested in the technology, but, like everything else I am going to let it mature before I even think about purchasing one.
      And besides, what is actually so hard about carrying a PDA and a phone, what did people do before computers?:
      Bob: George what do you carry with you?
      George: I carry a day planner, phone book, a few rolls of quarters, and a legal pad.
      Bob: Why?
      George: So I can keep track of my day, make phone calls and produce documents
      Bob: Really, I got this new fangled smart phone that does all that plus some ... but it only works for five minutes every other half hour.

    2. Re:Pros vs. Cons by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      most 'better' normal gsm phones come with phone book(_all_ gsm phones here, ever), a calendar, and some way to take notes.

      anyways.. i got myself a nokia 3650 yesterday.. 400 euros, still a _phone_ but with a twist(symbian apps, j2me, mmc cards for memory expanding(16mb default card comes with it), bluetooth). pretty slick compared to other phones in the price range that may come with j2me and 1mb of memory, or the 7650 that has less memory(and i don't like it's sliding pad, 3650 is also cheaper(!)).

      but if one wants just a planner, calendar and phone book _any_ modern phone will do.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  9. he's clueless... by stewart.hector · · Score: 4, Informative

    He is obviously clueless...

    "While it seems to lack a little bit of polish as the first commercially available Smartphone, the SPV is not a bad device. "

    Erm, It isn't the first commercial smartphone. Symbian phones have been around for a while, years in fact - for example, Erccisson R380 (I think there was a version before this one?), and Nokia - the Brick - Communicator 9210 - and there was a version before this too.

    With Symbian you get a rock solid phone and software, far more than MS can possibly provide. Symbian phones have far better security and their OS isn't bloated, as opposite to MS its in pathetic (toy) OSes.

    --
    1. Re:he's clueless... by Splezunk · · Score: 1
      What about Handspring, Kyocera, Samsung and other Palm based Smartphones. There are plenty out there.

      Not to whinge about Mickey$oft, but why don't they try do something that is usefull, and not "market Share"?

    2. Re:he's clueless... by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      Those are not smartphones, those are PDA's that had phone functionality put in after the fact. The smartphone is the exact opposite (smartphone as a generic term not MS crap). It was a phone designed with PDA functionality.

      Might be nit picking, but there is a world of difference.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  10. Anyone else by Grelli · · Score: 5, Funny
    Is anyone else having flashbacks to Antitrust and the SYNAPSE network that NURV was developing?

    That's just a little freaky in my books.

    1. Re:Anyone else by SphynxSR · · Score: 1

      crap you beat my post.

      --

      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
    2. Re:Anyone else by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I think you've actually got a point.

      First Microsoft went for the OS market
      Next came the browser wars
      This was followed by the battle of the servers and PDAs.
      Soon afterward came the battle for the gaming console.
      Now, I believe smart watches and smart cellphones.

      I'm havin trouble thinkin' of anything in my life Microsoft hasn't tried to take over. (All of which they've lost so far. I use Linux, Mozilla, No Server or PDA, Nintendo 64, Casio Watch and Motorola Cellphone)

      I don't cherish the thought of having one all-seeing, all-knowing presence touching every part of my daily life.

      Course maybe privacy is a wee-bit old fashioned.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    3. Re:Anyone else by jrl87 · · Score: 1

      In reffering to Antitrust, are you implying that Microsoft is stealling and even killing for the code running on the phone?

      Now, let's assume they are. I know the people at Microsoft are thick, but are they so bad that they would steal inferior code? It just doesn't make sense.

    4. Re:Anyone else by evilviper · · Score: 1

      And in the end, after Milo discovers that Bill Gates had dozens of people killed, rather than Gates doing any jail time, Milo will distribute the source code.

      That'll teach him! Kill people, and your code will be GPL'd! Take _THAT_!

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Anyone else by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Or more importantly...why would they need to kill people to steal *open source* code?

    6. Re:Anyone else by danheskett · · Score: 0

      Your post is really weird!

      You first claim that MS is this all-powerful company that is going to touch every part of your life.

      But then you go ahead and note that they in fact DO NOT touch any part of your life.

      Microsoft is just one more company. They do pretty well in some markets, and not so much in others.

    7. Re:Anyone else by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      All of which they've lost so far. I use Linux, Mozilla, No Server or PDA, Nintendo 64, Casio Watch and Motorola Cellphone

      Keep in mind that you are a minority. Most people use MS Windows, and most use MSIE, and any market penetration beyond that makes it worse. The more markets they capture, the more your bastion of freedom looks like a prison cell. It's not good enough to say "They haven't affected me" when they're all around you. More needs to be done. Of course, I use MSWin and MSIE, but I'm not buying a MS PDA, or products for any other markets they're trying to capture.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    8. Re:Anyone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't cherish the thought of having one all-seeing, all-knowing presence touching every part of my daily life."

      don't get married, then.

    9. Re:Anyone else by Alex_Ionescu · · Score: 1

      You've just noticed this now?
      What do you think .NET is?
      If I remember correctly, Synapse's motto was "Any device, anywhere, any time" .NET's motto is something like "Anywhere, any time, on any platform, on any device."

    10. Re:Anyone else by frogbutt · · Score: 1

      Did anyone else see Micro$oft SPY instead of SPV?

      Routing all the calls through Redmond could explain why it's a little sluggish.

  11. I'm surprised... by DJ_CCx · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...no one's gone ahead and tried to run Linux on it yet...where's my modchip?

    1. Re:I'm surprised... by earthloop · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...no one's gone ahead and tried to run Linux on it yet...where's my modchip?

      Actually, somebody has. No mod chip required either.

      See: http://xmob.co.uk/ll.php/9

  12. Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That phone is silver, not orange.

    1. Re:Uhh... by NDeans · · Score: 1

      Orange is a reference to the phone carrier that the phone was produced for.
      That's: Orange

    2. Re:Uhh... by telstar · · Score: 2, Funny

      sarcasm - n. - A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound.

  13. Re:ridiculous phones by LordSah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would really like a phone to sync to my PC's PIM. I've seen a demo of a smartphone, and that was the coolest features by far...the dude just grabbed his entire contact list from outlook. I use my phone as my contact list, with no back up, because I'm too lazy to retype the whole thing. I could also see it's usefulness to send quick emails.

    I'll agree with you on the games/camera/web browsing though.

  14. This reminds me of a movie. by SphynxSR · · Score: 1

    ANTITRUST, where this guy looks kinda like this real life guy. And he is taking over the airways. But in real life the government is helping. Scary, I'm going to put it in the DVD, I love horror movies.

    --

    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
  15. Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by OmniVector · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Why the hell is it taking PDA/Cell Phone/MP3 Player/Keyboard/Mouse manufacturers so DAMN long to get bluetooth implemented as a standard across the board for syncing devices, which is what it's particulary good at - close distance, high bandwidth traffic. It's beginning to really piss me off since it has the implications to be so useful.

    I urge for the day i can use my iPod as a clicker device to go to the next slide in a presentation, or when i can set my iPod next to my laptop and automatically sync it. I urge for the day i can walk into a room with a bluetooth keychain and have my pre-programmed computer automatically turn the lights on and start playing music ala Minority report. We *HAVE* the technology to do all this, why the hell are hardware manufacturers kicking their damn heals so much?

    ok i'm done ranting
    &lt/RANT>

    --
    - tristan
    1. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Funny

      We *HAVE* the technology to do all this, why the hell are hardware manufacturers kicking their damn heals so much?

      You keep using that phrase, I do not think it means what you think it means.

    2. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by evilviper · · Score: 1
      when i can set my iPod next to my laptop and automatically sync it.

      Riiiggghhttt. So you want an iPod with it's own perpetual power so you never have to plug it in.

      Hey, firewire is just on small cable... What's the problem?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      I urge for the day i can use my iPod as a clicker device to go to the next slide in a presentation, or when i can set my iPod next to my laptop and automatically sync it.

      I bet you're not urging for the kind of battery drain that would go hand in hand with your iPod's wireless sync capability. Or the length of time the sync would take if you were moving a reasonable number of songs onto it.

      And if you want a presentation clicker and a proximity sensor today, get a Mac and one of the phones supported by Salling Clicker. I haven't integrated it into my home automation setup yet, but the possibilities are practically endless.

      ~Philly

    4. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by Locutus · · Score: 1

      what are you talking about? 10meter Bluetooth ( Class 2 ) pulls less than 40mA xmitting. We are not talking about WiFi( 802.11 ) here.

      I've run a Zaurus with an internet connected Bluetooth module for over 6 hours of continuous network access. Twice that with the frontlight turned off( not very practical ). I'm lucky to get 2 hours with a WiFi connection.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    5. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main reason I don't use Bluetooh when designing my products is the cost of the chips. Take a look at some bluetooth manufacturer web sites to get a feel for the cost. It's nothing to sneeze at.

    6. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by Locutus · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? 10meter Bluetooth ( Class 2 ) pulls less than 40mA xmitting. We are not talking about WiFi( 802.11 ) here.

      Power drain would not be so excessive that it would require "perpetual power" to be useful. Less than 40mA for short periods is no big deal. IMHO.

      There seems to be alot of mis-information out there about Bluetooth. It's not just for short range wireless and it's not high power draining. FYI, there are 3 classes of devices related to 3 ranges:
      Class 1= 100 meters
      Class 2= 10 meters
      Class 3= 2 meters

      WiFi specs only 100 meters at 10Mb/s and so the antenna must be amplified enough to support this and so it's a power hog.

      Bluetooths PAN( Personal Area Network ) is something Microsoft does NOT want to see taking off because their OS isn't involved in typical PAN communications. Without desktop OS support and opposition from Microsoft, it's an uphill battle.... IMHO

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    7. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I urge for the day i can walk into a room with a bluetooth keychain and have my pre-programmed computer automatically turn the lights on and start playing music ala Minority report.

      So you are advocating running a microwave transmitter from your pants and you still want children?

    8. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Power drain would not be so excessive that it would require "perpetual power" to be useful. Less than 40mA for short periods is no big deal. IMHO.

      You miss the point. The Firewire connection to the iPod is also how it recharges. What's the point of a wireless iPod? You still have to plug it in for power.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by albino+eatpod · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? ;) He's referring to the fact that the iPod is charged when it's synced via the Firewire cable - either that, or you have to plug it in to a mains charger. Also, if you're syncing via Bluetooth, you're not just going to have the 40mA being drawn - there's HD usage too remember. If you're copying over a few gig of MP3s, that's going to take its toll.

    10. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you might want to address that stupid comment to everyone who carries a cellphone, too

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    11. Re:Semi offtopic - BlueTooth by stickyc · · Score: 3, Informative
      I urge for the day i can walk into a room with a bluetooth keychain and have my pre-programmed computer automatically turn the lights on and start playing music ala Minority report. We *HAVE* the technology to do all this, why the hell are hardware manufacturers kicking their damn heals so much?

      I'd disagree, the solution's already there with very popular off-the-shelf hardware. All you need is:

      And your dream has come true...
  16. Why no Bluetooth support? by tickleboy2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems strange to me that there is no Bluetooth support... especially since it's from Microsoft. If they intigrate Bluetooth, they could definitely do a lot of cool things between it and a computer (or several devices for that matter). Maybe it's because Bluetooth isn't widely accepted yet but without the devices, how is it goint to become widely accepted?

    --
    The only thing that will stop you from fulfilling your dreams is you. - Tom Bradley
    1. Re:Why no Bluetooth support? by stewart.hector · · Score: 1

      If you want a smartphone with Bluetooth, get a Symbian based phone.

      You'll be doing yourself a favour - also it can still manage Word, excel for all you windows freaks.

      --
    2. Re:Why no Bluetooth support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they put Bluetooth into it, then someone would figure out how to connect it to Macs with iSync.

    3. Re:Why no Bluetooth support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems strange to me that there is no Bluetooth support... especially since it's from Microsoft.

      Nothing strange about it, they just haven't yet figured out a way to "improve" Bluetooth in a way that is proprietary to Windows. It's all about vendor lock-in, baby.

    4. Re:Why no Bluetooth support? by Locutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      because it's from Microsoft is why there's not Bluetooth. They don't want device to device communications because there's not a desktop OS involved. Frankly, I'm surprised HP has pulled it off with not only supporting Bluetooth on the ipaq but also with their Linux website( handhelds.org ).

      Even though Bluetooth is pretty low power it's not a technology Microsoft wants. IMHO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  17. The BSquare Maui by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I read a while back about BSquare's Maui device which according to the article was a pretty cool device. GSM is included along with Bluetooth, if IIRC.

    Unfortunately the company can't seem to find an ODM who wants to bring them to market. Another case of good technology getting killed before even reaching the marketplace.

    1. Re:The BSquare Maui by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the first hit off of Google that references the Maui. There doesn't seem to be a speaker and mic, the phone feature is probably done through a headset (blech).

  18. Is it just me or... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Insightful
    He gave the phone 2.5 out of 5 for poor sound quality. So it makes poor phone calls. Therefore it fails as a phone. So why would I buy this as opposed to a gameboy?

    If I'm going to buy a phone, make sure it makes phone calls!

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    1. Re:Is it just me or... by mactov · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't just you. "Poor RF" "Poor sound quality" AND the keyboard is awkward.

      Why would I even want to look at it?

      Does it sometimes seem that designers get so excited about the bells and whistles that they forget functionality altogether?

      One of the least-cool but most functional gadgets ever invented was the Radio Shack M100 -- even by the standards of the 80's, it looked clunky, it had one of the worst screens in history, but it did what it was designed to do (and actually a few things more -- anyone else ever hook one up to a Macintosh?) But cool? Nope. The darn thing just worked.

      --
      OK, now what?
    2. Re:Is it just me or... by eye69 · · Score: 1

      "If I'm going to buy a phone, make sure it makes phone calls!"

      Would this be with or without your knowledge?

  19. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    genious. I wish I had mod points to off set the fat boy that modded you down.

  20. Slow by IO+ERROR · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Seems the reviewer thought the phone was sluggish at times. I'm not surprised at this; Microsoft certainly has lost the art of writing solid, efficient code. As have most of us, unfortunately. And apparently the signal quality sucks, the audio sucks, and the buttons are too small.

    So why would anyone buy this phone at all?

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    1. Re:Slow by malia8888 · · Score: 4, Funny
      From the article:

      Cons: *poor RF * poor sound quality * no easy way to switch tasks * phone gets sluggish at times * terrible keypad * camera attachment could be better * could not get WAP browser working * no J2ME

      I guess since the phone doesn't explode on impact or cause humans to spontaneously combust--could give it a go;)

      --
      Harpo Tunnel Syndrome--my wrist feels funny.
    2. Re:Slow by mlk · · Score: 1

      > So why would anyone buy this phone at all?

      It is made by microsoft, thats joe-user hooked.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah, blah, blah...

    4. Re:Slow by mothrathegreat · · Score: 1

      I actually own one. The phone is a little sluggish at times, particularly when changing your 'desktop' theme, very occasionaly during menu navigation but nothing unusable. The audio does not suck it sound just as clear as my old 6210, plus i get to use a decent ring tone of my choice (any .wav) which sound awesome. The buttons may be smaller than the norm but they are just fine once you get used to it and I can still text quite easily.
      It's not really that bad a phone, I like it anyway.

      --
      Extended Warranty? How can I lose!
    5. Re:Slow by mcjulio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The sluggishness of the device has nothing to do with the OS or apps software on the phone, and everything to do with the flash filesystem and the driver that powers it. The SPV is quite powerful enough to run snappy on WinCE - the bottleneck lies in the file I/O tech used for this version.

      This will eventually be fixed, but it will require new hardware and/or driver upgrades. It is currently the #1 SPV complaint, I believe.

  21. Not the first commercially available Smartphone by alwynschoeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hi, The Orange one isn't the first commercially available Smartphone. It has been for sale from SMART (operator) in the Philippines for the last few months. I do not think it is selling as expected seeing that most people do not care about Powoerpoint, etc on their phones... CEO's tend to make decisions based on their own reference framework and not that of the market which they do not represent.

    1. Re:Not the first commercially available Smartphone by blowdart · · Score: 1

      Actually the Orange SPV has been around for over 6 months. It's not exactly now.

  22. Obscure UI? by djupedal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:Obscure UI? by zulux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What a joke - he coulden't make an emergency call.

      Most Ericsson phones will let you dial 911 or 112 (or whaterver it is in Europe) at any time - even during the PIN unlock stage, before you've entered a correct PIN.

      Just like a typical Microsoft product - like their fileservers that come with builtin 3DPinball, Wordpad and Solitaire - but don't actually do a decent job of serving files.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    2. Re:Obscure UI? by big_gibbon · · Score: 1

      Nokia phones will also allow you to make calls while the keypad's locked, though not while the "enter PIN" message is displayed - though IIRC you can make emergency calls with no SIM in the phone.

      999 is the official emergency number in the UK, but it's being transferred over to 112 - partially to make it more difficult for keylocked phones to dial the emergency number. The emergency services here have apparently had loads of problems with being called by people's pockets . . .

      P

    3. Re:Obscure UI? by h_jurvanen · · Score: 1

      999 is the official emergency number in the UK, but it's being transferred over to 112 - partially to make it more difficult for keylocked phones to dial the emergency number.

      Sounds rather urban-legendesque. I suspect that maybe the real reason why the number is changing is because 112 is the standard number throughout the EU, and that keylocked phones have nothing to do with it.

    4. Re:Obscure UI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All GSM phones are required to allow the user to make an emergency call from the PIN lock screen. It is a requirement you have to meet before any operator will allow your phone to be deployed or sold on its network.

      Smartphone 2002 is no different. It also allows emergency calls to be made from the device lock (password-protection) screen.

    5. Re:Obscure UI? by lmfr · · Score: 1
      "I suspect that maybe the real reason why the number is changing is because 112 is the standard number throughout the EU"

      Here in Portugal the same thing happened, for that same reason. We switch from 115 to 112 a couple of years ago, though I still think of an emergency when I see the number 115...

    6. Re:Obscure UI? by tf23 · · Score: 1

      What's the point? That the guy didn't know how to operate his own phone? That's what I got out of it. That's not the phone's fault...

  23. Re:he's clueless... or not by Faeton · · Score: 5, Informative
    Howard's obviously not clueless to this, as he's reviewed both those phones already a while back. Check out his site.

    Smartphone (with a capital S) is Microsoft's brandname for... smartphones (duh!). They've copyrighted the name, so that's what Howard means when he writes "first commercially available Smartphone".

    I've played with the phone myself, and the OS isn't bloated compared to the Symbian phones (they're about the same). In fact, my Nokia 3650, which uses Symbian, crashes every now and then. I'm not saying the MS one doesn't crash, but don't think because it's made by someone other than Microsoft that it's automagically better.

  24. useless junk by ravinfinite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe we have here another classic case of "integrating a shit-load of features into something small and utterly useless".

    I guess they'll make a portable all-in-one X-BOX, DVD Player, cell phone, laptop with Windows XPee, tape recorder, CD burner, microwave, refrigerator, dishwasher, ass-wiper and "port-a-potty" device next.

    This is completely useless and shows no innovation or creativity. I guess they're trying to take bloated software to the next level: bloated hardware.

    1. Re:useless junk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as long as they make it handheld!

  25. Re:ridiculous phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > Is there anyone else out there that thinks these all-in-one super go go gadget phones are totally stupid?

    probably...even the stupidest opinion will find support somewhere...

    > Don't you realize there are billions of people starving in this world?

    yes I do.....what's your point?

  26. Big deal. by almaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I want someone to realise that I always carry around my wallet, my keys and my phone.

    Why is it, therefore, that we don't see a combination smartphone/pda/wallet? An average wallet is large enough to put a decent-sized LCD screen and a keypad in (after all, many wallets are quite similar in design to a clamshell-type 'phone).

    This would be a kick-ass device because it'd have a big screen *and* reduce the amount of space everything takes up in my pockets. Surely it's the obvious thing to do?

    Hang on - given it's obvious, I'll just off and patent it...

    1. Re:Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you could fit an entire beowolf cluster in your typical womans handbag!

    2. Re:Big deal. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      So you want companies to design electronics to be sat on? Either that, or you want to clip you wallet on your belt. Neither is a good idea.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Big deal. by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it, therefore, that we don't see a combination smartphone/pda/wallet?

      Because identity theft is enough of a problem already, without some pickpocket being able to get your wallet, keys, and phone with one deft move.

      ~Philly

    4. Re:Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you get your trousers stolen.(I did from the side of a football pitch)

  27. First one, huh? by caouchouc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Microsoft's new Orange SPV which is the first commercially available Smartphone

    All this time, I must have been imagining commercially available smartphones like the Handspring Treo and the Kyocera Smartphone.

    1. Re:First one, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Smartphone" is Microsoft's copywritten brand name.

      He's saying that this is the first release of a "Smartphone," hence the capitalization.

    2. Re:First one, huh? by bucketoftruth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a Treo. It is awesome. I have an SSH client, an IMAP client, a web browser and it plays all those stupid popcap games. It doesn't play MP3s, but I think the sony Clie version does. I'm extremely happy with it. I need nothing else.

    3. Re:First one, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like an awfully pro-Microsoft article (nope, didn't read it!) considering how Microsoft likes to claim to have invented everything.

    4. Re:First one, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people insist on making it public just how clueless they really are? If you're going to sound dumb every time you try to be smart why don't you just post anonumously?

    5. Re:First one, huh? by VikingBrad · · Score: 1
      Yes, the Treo 270/300 was released in 2002 and is in terms of functionality well ahead of the various Microsoft Smartphones.

      Some reviews have said that on a MS Smartphone you can't even dial a contact from withint Outlook, wtf!

      The next generation of Treo, the Treo 600, looks very sweet

      Cheers VikingBrad

    6. Re:First one, huh? by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      How exactly would one post anonumously?
      Man, someone should put in a preview button, so simple typos didn't make it into posts.
      To your 'question' now:
      Some people prefer not to post anonymously. That's why there are accounts and such.
      Although considering that posting anonymously *is* an option, and "anonymously" is one of the words right on the post comment page, I'd expect you to be able to spell it, logged in or not.
      (it's right under the line telling you about the preview button, which you seem to have missed as well.)

    7. Re:First one, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smartphone with a capital 'S' has been registered by someone as a trademark.

      (as mentioned by some one else in reply to a previous post that this is a dupe of.)

    8. Re:First one, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's interesting, then, how that Kyocera is also a "Smartphone" (yes, capitalized) and is not associated with Microsoft.

    9. Re:First one, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how'd the Kyocera get ahold of the mystical capital-S?

      Microsoft owns the trademark "WINDOWS POWERED SMARTPHONE", and no variation thereof.

      "Smartphone" is fair game and not specific to Pocket PC. Try a search next time, troll.

    10. Re:First one, huh? by dabootsie · · Score: 1

      Brand names are trademarks, not copyrights. Microsoft doesn't have a trademark for "Smartphone."

      A quick search on the Trademark Electronic Search System shows that the only live "Smartphone" trademark is owned by ART Advanced Recognition Technologies, Inc... and it's for a logo only.
      Microsoft has WINDOWS POWERED SMARTPHONE, but that's not the single word "Smartphone" with a capital S.

      I'm afraid that the reviewer there was just wrong.

  28. Re:Well... - oh lord... by pVoid · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I must add the full quote... man Mike Myers is the best. Enjoy:

    Head! Paper! Now!

    Move that melon of yours and get the paper if you can!

    Haulin' that gargantuan cranium about!

    I'm not kidding, that boy's head's like Sputnik!

    Spherical, but quick pointy in parts.

    Well, that was off sides, wasn't it?

    He'll be crying himself to sleep tonight on his *huge* pillow!

  29. Re:ridiculous phones by almaw · · Score: 2, Informative

    You don't need a Microsoft-powered 'phone to do that. I've been synching my contacts and calendar from Outlook to my phone(s) for years.

    FusionOne used to offer a free service to give you synch across many devices (including many mobile 'phone types).

    If you want free stuff and have a Nokia, you can get software from their web site which lets you do this. Other manufacturers also have synch software these days too.

    All you need is an IR-port (USB ones are sub-$20) or a data cable for your phone (which will probably be more than that).

  30. Buggy, Locks Up/Pauses, Why would you want one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll need to wait for winCE 6.0 before they get the bugs out of it.

    1. Re:Buggy, Locks Up/Pauses, Why would you want one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll need to wait for winCE 6.0 before they get the bugs out of it.

      Redhat is up to 9.0 now. What's their problem?

  31. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what your mom said last night. Actually, I think I know the commercial, and it does sound kinda like that...

  32. if the phone sucks by BigBir3d · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is because of Orange. They are the cell phone manufacturer after all. Microsoft is just providing all the add on cr@p that a cell phone doesn't really need (mp3 and video).

    Button size, signal receiver, lack of RF, lack of BT (keeps size and price a bit smaller), those were choices made by Orange. No J2E is Microsoft. Although I am not sure why no J2E is bad, but that might just be me.

    1. Re:if the phone sucks by AdamInParadise · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bollocks!

      First Orange is a network operator, not a cell phone manufacturer. Second, the phone is made by HTC and resold in a few countries by different operators. Orange had no say in the design. Now it seems that they neuteured the phone by preventing the user from installing unsigned software while not working with developers to provide them with a easy way to sign their apps.

      --
      Nobox: Only simple products.
    2. Re:if the phone sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wish I had some mod points to mod you up.

      This "Orange is the manufacturer" is such a crock of sh*t. Microsoft is, HTC just assembles the things to Microsofts designs.

      HTC didn't risk their money going into the phone business, Orange didn't invest in the phone design, it was Microsoft who couldn't get anyone to make their phones so they went for this 'phoney' (sorry) story.

    3. Re:if the phone sucks by muggy2 · · Score: 1

      Not quite...

      Orange didn't make the cell phone, HTC did and then shopped it around. Orange were the only ones foolish enough to pick it up and sell it.

      Anyway, why is this news? The SPV has been in the shops for > 6 months.

    4. Re:if the phone sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's not Orange's. The manufacturer is HTC.

    5. Re:if the phone sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lack of BT

      Why would you want Bit Torrent on a cell phone? This thing doesn't have enought space to store the downloads, and with the slow speeds of wireless internet, it's really not worth it.
      :)

    6. Re:if the phone sucks by mcjulio · · Score: 1

      For the record, MS is providing everything on the phone, software-wise, from the hardware abstraction layer up. Beneath the HAL, in code not owned by MS, is the drivers and the radio stack.

      The SPV suffers from 2 major software flaws that are outside MS control - IPSM (Intel Persistent Storage Manager) flash filesystem, which eliminates the need for a backup battery but introduces enormous performance problems, and a dodgy radio stack that is less than 100% reliable.

      The SPV also suffers from several hardware-related problems, which are design flaws owned by HTC. Among these are inferior audio quality, key size and spacing, and general sturdiness.

      At launch time, Orange completely locked down the SPV, which shut out every hobbyist developer and generated piles of (well-deserved) bad press. Shortly after this fiasco, 2 security holes were discovered that negated this lockdown. Sometime after that, Orange reversed their policy and provided the unlocking configuration for anyone who wanted it.

      All the other flaws on the phone that are visible in the software are the fault of MS and its version 1 process, but it's interesting to note that many of the major complaints about the device are, in fact, breakdowns outside the sphere of MS influence. (Not that it makes any difference at all for Joe User.)

    7. Re:if the phone sucks by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Are you sure, I always thought that Orange = HTC (Hutchinson).

    8. Re:if the phone sucks by AdamInParadise · · Score: 1

      No.

      Orange belongs to France Telecom and HTC stands for High Tech Computer Corp, a Taiwanese company. No relation what so ever.

      --
      Nobox: Only simple products.
  33. Symbian sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is all that needs to be said

  34. First smartphone? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    I've had a kyoccera 7135 for about a week now, it has built in PalmOS 4.1, Dragonball 33 mhz, 16 megs.. SD/MMC slot, plays mp3s, sends faxes, 3G wireless, all that shit..

    Perhaps, of course, that this headline is three weeks late. Quite possible. All i know is this is one cool ass phone.

    I been playing pac man on it since I got it.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  35. first available "Smartphone" by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Informative

    as the first commercially available Smartphone

    Smartphones have been around for several years, based on Symbian and PalmOS. And the term has been around for a number of years as well. Microsoft should really not be able to take out trademarks on generic terms like "Windows" and "Smartphone".

  36. Orange? by Victor+Liu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks more like a lemon to me.

  37. Re:he's clueless... or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony E. used the name "Smartphone" for one of the older "PDA/Phone" jobs.

  38. clickable link by jrl87 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:clickable link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we horny for mod points today?

  39. Microsoft stealing from the commons by bstadil · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Smartphone (with a capital S) is Microsoft's brandname for... smartphones (duh!). They've copyrighted the name, so that's what Howard means when he writes "first commercially available Smartphone".

    You make a good point, but taking Names (TM) that already has a meaning and copyright it is stealing from the commons.

    They steal the meaning that this name already have. There is nothng wrong with picking a name that helps you in the beginning you just need to undertand that what helps you now will hurt you later so take your pick.

    It like the Trademarking of the word Windows. WTF. This was picked percisely because it had a well definied and undertaood meaning. The name helped yuo in the beginning now you are stuck with something that is generic and should be allowed to be trademarked.

    Nothing wrong with Smartphone but as a trade mark give me a break. Maybe we need to rename Gnome or KDE SmartWindows.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:Microsoft stealing from the commons by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      You make a good point, but taking Names (TM) that already has a meaning and copyright it is stealing from the commons.

      Yes, only M$ would be so evil to trademark common nouns. Well, I have to go connect to the Oracle(tm) server using my Apple(tm). I'll be using the web interface so I'll probably be using Safari(tm)

  40. hes looking for his 15 min of fame by crux6rind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a lill bit OOT but...
    anybody noticed that on all reviews on his site ,this guy always put his face along with the phone.
    like he wanna be famuos or sumthin?

    --

    d035 7hi5 100k 1ik3 4n l337 5i6 2 j00 ?
    1. Re:hes looking for his 15 min of fame by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      What's so wrong with that?
      Personally, I may meet somebody on a forum or IRC, but after a couple days I can forget who's who easily. A human face is easier for most people to remember, and then people might even have an easier time associating his name with his face with his article.

      On that line of thinking, if you really to take credit for your work, put a picture of yourself with it.

    2. Re:hes looking for his 15 min of fame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh?

      I should attach a picture of myself to all code I write?

      I should put a picture of myself on the server each time I upgraded some software?

      I should put a picture of myself on the coffee machine when I put a new kettle on?

    3. Re:hes looking for his 15 min of fame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jealousy is a funny thing...

      So what if he puts his mug shot up before every article. So what if his site address is probably his name. So what if he wants to have his "15 mins"?

      The site is good. People will keep going there to check out new phones... and guess what? His 15 mins will probably last a lot longer then you think.

  41. Call Me Crazy But... by aerojad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I really don't see any decent reason for packing cell-phones with so many features. How about making the cell phone have better reception so call-drops are less frequent, instead of being able to download mp3s to play them on the cellphone speakers. It's extra features like that which turn it into more of a novelty item than something that could have pratical use. I would like my phone to dial numbers, call people, and sound clear... I really don't see the use in downloading quake or Microsoft patches for security so no one can run illegal scripts off my cellphone if I happen to be using it for a server or something.

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
    1. Re:Call Me Crazy But... by kinnell · · Score: 1
      I really don't see any decent reason for packing cell-phones with so many features

      Many people carry around a phone and a PDA, and maybe some other stuff like MP3 players. The point is to put all this functionality into one box so your pockets/belt aren't stuffed with gadgets. It's more like a PDA with a built in phone than a phone with a built in PDA. If you don't see the need for this, it's because this kind of product is not developed for people like you - stick to a regular cell phone. That being said, this does seems like a really bad implementation - if the phone part does not work as well as a regular cell phone, it's hardly worth it.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    2. Re:Call Me Crazy But... by kris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about making the cell phone have better reception so call-drops are less frequent, instead of being able to download mp3s to play them on the cellphone speakers.

      I have had a cellphone now since 1996 or so, starting with a Siemens S4 and I am currently the Siemens ME45 and I can count the number of calls that have terminated due to bad reception or network failures on a single hand. I really do not understand how you can view cellphone connection stability as an issue?

      Kristian

    3. Re:Call Me Crazy But... by aerojad · · Score: 1

      I live in the Upper Pinnusela of Michigan (hold up your left hand... then imagine a thumb sticking horizontally above the hand...), and while the entire trip from Detroit to Sault Ste. Marie is covered by cell phone towers and in theory, reception, calls are notorious for dropping out in certain places along I-75 that aren't even all that hilly or provide terrain that would block signals.

      --

      SecondPageMedia - Wha
    4. Re:Call Me Crazy But... by Eminence · · Score: 1

      You are not crazy as sales of these gadget-phones clearly show. Most customers want just basic services and even huge marketing campaigns result in a very slow rise of demand for MMS-es & other gadgets.

  42. Sat On? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I keep mine in my front pocket, so the wallet would do fine there... plus wallets (the bulky sort) can have a little bit of padding and/or metal to protect the screen.

    It seems like a pretty good idea to me, although wallets do take a lot of abuse... but fitting the contents of an older Palm V in one should be easy by now. I'm just not sure where it would work to mount ports. Also, I'm not sure how nice it would be to hold a wallet to use as a PDA - I'll bet that wouldn't feel good for long.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  43. This guys [sic] my hero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I used Perl, I would use freedline.

  44. Another (more balanced?) review of this phone by Marcus+Green · · Score: 1

    http://www.computerweekly.co.uk/articles/article.a sp?liArticleID=121069&liArticleTypeID=20&liCategor yID=1&liChannelID=7&liFlavourID=1&sSearch=&nPage=1

    (paste that long URL link together if it wraps)

  45. Just AD + FUD, here is the truth : by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #1 it is old news (so not for nerds)
    #2 it is not compatible with either PalmOS, WinCE (the regular one), Java or whatever ! (so it does not matter)

    #3 it s*ks to have ad-campaign for MS, again and again on /.

    When it is not an ad campaign it is FUD :(

    Are people so adicted by MS, that can never make an objective analysis ?

    _TOZS

  46. Re:he's clueless... or not by Marcus+Green · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I had a Psion 5MX (uses a version of the Symbian OS) for about 5 years. It went about 3 years without crashing and I used it every day. Other people have reported similar or better experiences with the version of the Symbian OS built into phones.

    Seems to me that this is cause to suggest that Symbian phone is likely to be more stable than an MS based phone.

  47. Security by AdamInParadise · · Score: 1

    "With Symbian you get a rock solid phone and software, far more than MS can possibly provide."

    Sure.

    "Symbian phones have far better security and their OS isn't bloated, as opposite to MS its in pathetic (toy) OSes."

    Sorry to disappoint you, but that's wrong. Windows Smartphone Edition is potentially a lot more secure than Symbian. Symbian got almost no security built in. It's just that everything is written correctly (and it can run Java). Windows SE, being a scaled down version of their main OS, has a lot of security features built in. However, it seems that they are not really well implemented. When this phone was launched in Europe (at least 8 months ago), users found that you could bypass the protections that prevented you from installing any program (yes, ANY program) by waiting for 15 minutes on the right screen !

    --
    Nobox: Only simple products.
    1. Re:Security by Troed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I fail to see any references to your claim that Symbian has no security features, and that Windows SE has .. :) Care you elaborate?

      I'm quite positively sure that .sis-files (Symbian installationfiles) are signed, as an example.

  48. Your mind isn't a terrible thing to waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How stupid are you?

    He tells us that microsoft tries to touch every part of our lives, but so far he has managed to circumvent their plans by using the alternatives.

  49. I imported one... by Antilles · · Score: 1

    Its a nice idea. however, the orange SPV is not ready for prime time. The one i got was from england via uk ebay.

    Pros:

    super small
    nice looking
    nice little OS... (you swear someone shoved a laptop in there, 132mghz, whoo!)
    plays cool games.
    is the future of phones, or at least the general direction (what you are really looking for is the samsung i600, or the mitac 8380 (june, baby!))
    plays a mean game of solitaire (looks almost just like the win32 version)
    syncs with outlook pretty well, some say as good as any.
    various SDKs for it.
    can be unlocked and decerted to run custom apps.
    has ie4.0 (no frames tho)
    plays doom!
    GRPS Internet! nice.

    cons:

    is super small
    OS is not ready for prime time. needs more work.
    200mghz is gonna fit this a lot better than 132mgz
    poor construction for a phone (i took it apart, its cheaply made)
    feels like it will break easy.
    dust gets under screen.
    buttons are too small
    buttons are hard to reach.
    ie4 doesnt support frames, resolutions is like 176x220
    little slow sometimes.
    isnt quite as functional as say a standard phone should be.
    did i mention it was poorly constructed?

    Smartphone Homesite:
    http://www.microsoft.com/mobile/smartph one/default.asp

    Major Smartphone Forums:
    http://smartphone.modaco.com
    (tons of info + community there)

    Mitac 8380!!!!
    http://www.brighthand.com/article/Mio_83 80_Smartphone_Includes_Digital_Camera
    (come to papa! - june!)

    lots of fun.

    I'm selling mine to get the mitac, so. It was a fun toy, but hopefully the mitac is more ready for prime time than the spv. Fun hacker toy, but im not ready to use it as my day to day phone. Its coming tho. It *IS* the future of phones, tho. no doubt.

    1. Re:I imported one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm really impressed by those figures - 132 milligram-hecto-zeptos isn't something you see every day, although I'm sure you're correct in saying that 200 would be even better.

      NIST Reference to SI Units

    2. Re:I imported one... by sziwan · · Score: 1
      can be unlocked and decerted to run custom apps.

      You consider this to be a pro? Well, I guess the X-Box modding business has done it, and people consider such things as quite normal...

      My point is that with all the other commercially available smartphones you dont't have to unlock them for custom software to work. You can well start off by writing your own software (particularly Nokia, with good SDK support comes to my mind) and running it on your phone with no concerns of voiding the warranty or having to modify the phone in any way.

  50. Old news... Six months at least. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This phone has been around for over six months now, and there are lots of reviews around... The successor, QTEK 7070 (Tanager) is already deployed in other telcos, with improved software, smaller form factor... So, what's up with old news?

  51. Grrh non-standard POS by Serveert · · Score: 1

    These...people... are pushing forth guidelines for writing "Orange"-friendly HTML...

    Check out this "Orange Web Development Guidelines"

    link

    It's password protected, I could access this yesterday, amazingly when I laughed at some Orange developers and posted about this on another forum yesterday, it was indeed not password protected.

    But the pdf guidelines basically states these gotchas

    1) Can't send any frames.. frames are filtered out before they get to the phone

    2) Jscript parser case sensitvity is opposite that of IE 4/5

    3) There's one font called "nina"

    So this is arguably HTML, in fact it's not HTML since frames are definitely a part of HTML. well 4.0 but they're using other 4.0 HTML features. So they're non-standard. WAP's next generation, wireless xHTML, is indeed a standard per the WAP forum, and should be adopted soon. It's just as feature-rich as wireless HTML markup can be, just like "Orange HTML" only difference is it's a standard unlike "Orange HTML." xHTML has been agreed upon by Japanese telco's, European carries, American carriers. SPV's hack of HTML browsing isn't a solution.. It's neat, but WAP will replace it. Guess WAP isn't crap.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    1. Re:Grrh non-standard POS by jpc · · Score: 1

      thats the nice thing about the Ericsson P800 it runs Opera and can do real html. frames still suck though, just because of the screen size so you have to scroll. i am posting this from it...

  52. An SPV user writes... by akpcep · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I actually have one of these, I've had it for a few weeks. I'm perfectly happy with it, especially since the handset cost me £30 (when I renewed by Orange contract, which I was going to do anyway). Audio is fine through the headphones, the built in speaker is a little crappy but certainly no worse than on the Sony Z7e I had previously (which was a piece of SHIT.) The OS is easy to use, OK not blindingly fast) but the screen is excellent, file browsing is a piece of piss and it Active Syncs with my PC like this - *plugs phone into provided USB cradle* *removes phone from cradle* No probs. My only gripes are that the keypad is RIDICULOUSLY small, and while I could have got the plug in keyboard for an extra £25, I can't be arsed carrying it around for the sake of SMS and navigating files etc. Second gripe is that to download and install non-official software you have to 'unlock' the phone (Orange do freely give you instructions on how to do this on their site) by modifying and reuploading a config file. Then it's Doom, SNES emulators etc a go-go. I haven't done this yet due to lack of time, but I shall. Once I unlock it and get a decent sized SD card, this is going to be a pretty handy budget PDA style device which is easy to use, very portable (it really is tiny) and to be honest, just as reliable as any other mobile device I've ever owned. While it is great fun to bash MS, if you want user experience, this phone hasn't once behaved badly and I've been giving it heavy daily usage. So there you have it.

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:An SPV user writes... by rich_r · · Score: 1
      As a fellow user, I'd agree with the above. I've had it a month now and I really love it. Doom? that rocks!


      The greatest thing, it's killer app has to be IM through gprs. I wish orange would wake up and realise what they've got with it!

  53. My brother had one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..for about a month before he gave up on it for lack of battery life and the way it'd crash as soon as you looked at it. He's now downgraded to a Sony Ericsson T68i and is much happier.

    BTW, he works for Microsoft and I (indirectly) work for Orange!

  54. Proof of the pudding ... by soupdragon · · Score: 1

    These phones got issued to all the Microsoft consultants and account managers here in the UK. Every time I would speak to one of them they would soon tell me about how bad these deveices were, that they crashed or their voicemail didn't work, etc. Pretty soon, it was noticable that they all were carrying two phone, the SPV and their previous standard Nokia.

    1. Re:Proof of the pudding ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I write code for a variety of "smartphone" devices (MS Smartphone/PPC, Symbian, Handspring/Palm, RIM Blackberry) and the Tanager (the next iteration of the SPV -- bigger keys/brighter screen/better joystick) is the first device where I've been willing to carry it without also carrying my trusty Nokia 8260.

      All the MS haters on this forum who've never actually seen or played with this thing can bash all they want, but this is a damn cool phone.

  55. I own one of these... by CountBrass · · Score: 4, Informative

    Been using it for the last few months and it is AWFUL !

    Sure it sounds great, colour screen, plays mp3s, core PDA functionality, web browsing and email using GPRS (I signed up for 7 megs a month because I thought this would be useful).

    But it is terrible !

    So what's the problem ? Well it hangs. All the time. I get busy cursors when all I'm doing is navigating the menus. It hangs when I'm trying to make a call (it seems to get its knickers in a twist if an incoming call arrives whilst your starting an outgoing call.

    Personally I'm really pissed off at having skipped the Ericsson (which I thought was too big) for this pile of shit. Been very happy with every Orange 'phone I've ever owned (been an Orange customer since they opened up here in the UK) but the SPV stinks. Edward

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    1. Re:I own one of these... by MoDaCo · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree (and not just for the sake of it, but really!) You signed up to a 7MB Package? What kind of package is that? And besides, since launch, Orange have provided 'unlimited' GPRS for £6 per month (~$9), which is now coming to an end. My phone simply does not hang. I use it with a huge range of software, including dodgy stuff like the freeware emulatoirs, and it doesn't hang. You occasionally will get a busy cursor, but it really is only occasionally, and it will disappear after a second or so. I have the P800 too, and an XDA and a 3650, and for me personally, the SPV beats them all hands down. Much more usable as a phone device (a keypad, T9 etc.), and more stable than my P800, which comes up with a weird graphical screen telling me to reboot by holding down the power button for 10 seconds VERY frequently. I too have been with Orange since the very beginning (Nokia 2140!), and feel that although the SPV launched perhaps a little early (before all the problems were ironed out), it is fundamentally a good phone. P

      --
      Paul O'Brien - Founder / Admin - MoDaCo SmartPhone - http://smartphone.MoDaCo.com
    2. Re:I own one of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting an incoming call whilst making an outgoing one is an old telephony problem. It's called glare. You'd think they'd have that sorted on a phone like this though.

    3. Re:I own one of these... by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      I think we'll have to agree to differ on the SPV.

      Ah the good old 2140 ! Now that was a solid phone :-) So good, I had two of them ;-)

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    4. Re:I own one of these... by HawkingMattress · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My brother owns one of these. We found it very sluggish at the beginning before we figured out that when we thought we closed an app, it was just minimized... I just used it five minutes myself, and what really got on my nerves was all the microsoft-ish things like having to register to use the file explorer, then realizing that the registration server is down... (took two days before my brother could reach it). Then you can't install the apps because they're not signed, wonder why, and figure that developpers have to pay something like $500 to microsoft so they "review the code".

      I'm not an anti microsoft zealot, but I think it was my phone it would have finished its life explosed on the wall after a few hours out of frustration

    5. Re:I own one of these... by akpcep · · Score: 1

      Unlocking the phone so you can use unsigned apps is very simple.

      --
      Hmmm.
    6. Re:I own one of these... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The file explorer application is third party and nothing to do with Microsoft. It's a time-limited demo of a commercial application, hence the registration.

      There is a free explorer application that is actually better and faster. You need to unlock your phone from the Orange website.

  56. Re:he's clueless... or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smartphone (with a capital S) is Microsoft's brandname for... smartphones (duh!). They've copyrighted the name, so that's what Howard means when he writes "first commercially available Smartphone".

    You cannot copyright a name. Perhaps they have trademarked it, but this is an entirely different thing.

  57. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which proves again what a stupid language y'all speak.

    Viva la France!

  58. This has been around for a few months now by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    Check out some of the articles on The Register. The general opinion, in Beavis and Butt-Head speak, seems to be that it sucks more than anything has ever sucked before. But what did you seriously expect from MS?

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  59. Alex Chu would be a better reviewer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I first say the reviewer's name, I thought it was Alex Chu. So I thought, cool, I wonder what bizzaro time-travel device he claims he got this phone from :) But then I rememberd it was Alex Chu not this fellows name.

    I think Alex Chu should definetely start some type of review site. It would probably be as funny as reading The Filthy Critic.

  60. What? This is news? by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These things have been out in the UK for so long that version 2 is being released!

    Granted, this is because version 1 was so poor that no one brought one - less than 100k units were shipped (which considering that there are about 10m sales/yr of high end phones in the UK is terrible). And that number was _after_ they started giving them away for free with a £25/mnth contract.

    Microsoft fucked up by making a bad phone - not really a surprise - and the only people who brought them were the XBox-modder wannabe-techie types who wouldn't know the different between C and Cobol.

    The most amusing part is that the only reason these phones sold _at all_ was because the DRM functions (you can only run executables signed by Orange and Microsoft) were broken by hackers very quickly - in fact for the French version it only required a reboot to execute. Now thats great security!

    Annoying never fixed bugs include numbers stored in a different way from Outlook/OE so that when you sync your phonebook you can't dial the numbers it downloaded, text messaging that randomly doesn't work, out-of-memory errors, and a phone so large and butt ugly it belongs in 1980.

    Another stunning victory then - Nokia must be quaking in their boots.

    --
    Beep beep.
  61. Great Paperweight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most of the team I'm working with bought these phones when we started on a project in the UK. They've been using them for about 6 months now, and these phones are loathed by all of them. They crash all the time, are very slow, and the user interface doesn't seem very intuitive at all. I'll stick with my Symbian phone.

  62. hmmm yes, other options by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

    Well i read the review and laughed all the way home as they say, i think i will stick with my amazing 7650, does all what the SPV was supposed to do and has blue tooth so i can control.

    The best util for this has to be Bemused, it allows you to control your winamp on your pc through the BT on your phone, wicked laugh.

    I hate to be a stereotypical advocate but Nokia really are the best at this sort of thing and i love my 7650.

    S

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
    1. Re:hmmm yes, other options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how is your bluetooth handsfree headset going, then?

      Ooh sorry, I forgot, the 7650 DOES NOT SUPPORT AUDIO OVER BLUETOOTH!

      Out of all the things you might want from Bluetooth,audio is at the top of most peoples lists. What an incredible oversight on Nokia's behalf.The 7650 is a pretty nice phone in general, but that is a killer.
    2. Re:hmmm yes, other options by blowdart · · Score: 1
      7650 DOES NOT SUPPORT AUDIO OVER BLUETOOTH!

      Thats my main problem with the 7650. Then there's the shitty battery life once you start keeping the screen backlight on, for example when you use WAP, or play games. 1 hour of playing snood on the train into work and I've gone from full battery to damn, I need to recharge now.

      It's heavy, it crashes about once a week (so I have to yank the battery out), the syncing software doesn't play nicely with the BlueTooth stack on my Toshiba 9100. The syncing software itself is buggy and upgrades to it don't overwrite the old software so you end up with multiple startup items, which interfere with each other.

      Come August I'm getting rid ot it, and I'm seriously looking at a SmartPhone.

    3. Re:hmmm yes, other options by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      7650 is ancient tech now...

      Mine has never crashed, and has a slightly better battery life than the couple of SPVs we have around the office (I can get 3/4 days with a following wind). With normal use (GPRS browsing an hour a day plus a few phone calls) I can get two days. A decent phone, really. Sure, it doesn't have the battery life of the 8310 (about two weeks most of the time between charges) but that's the problem with backlit displays... wait until the new organic displays start appearing if you want long battery life (they're phosphorescent and hardly draw any power).

      For a new phone you're looking at the 7250i, or the 3300 which has 64MB MMC memory (the mobile version of Opera should run OK on it).

  63. Great Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The SPV is gonna be a killer phone in my opinion.

    There's some great stuff on MoDaCo (www.modaco.com) like the new Spectrum emulator and a port of xRick (Rick Dangerous), which is deiniftely my favourite application!

  64. I have an SPV - read on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    I have had an SPV since December 2002.

    The condition it shipped from the factory was less than desirable - no Task Manager, various bugs and a certification system that detered even the most enthusiastic developers (I include myself).

    However, the developer community, represented by people such as www.modaco.com and www.smartphony.org, soon turned the device on its head - cracked the certification, SIM unlocked the phone, put pressure on Orange and Microsoft to fix the bugs, and developed a whole raft of excellent applications.

    The SPV is now by far the best community-supported phone on the market. It is a joy to develop for and has enough capability to handle new and ported (PocketPC) apps.

    To give you an idea of what community-developed apps work well with the phone, we have solid versions of Doom, Tetris, chess, a Gameboy Color emulator, various DivX players, MP3/OGG/WMA players, video calling (see who's calling you), WABA (Java-like), Task Manager, File Manager, Text editor, SCUMM player (Lucasarts game player - Monkey Island!!), ZX Spectrum emulator, and many more.

    This is in addition to many excellent commercial apps.

    A typical day with my SPV includes making/receiving calls, checking Slashdot on the train to work, playing some Tetris and Super Mario, listening to relaxation music on my headphones, VNC-ing (yes, VNC!!) to servers, chatting over MSN, taking a few photos and capturing some video, and checking Tube routes. Plus, I use the super-bright screen as a torch at night :)

    Try all that on any other phone.

    Oh yeah, and the phone only crashes about once every 2 or 3 days, which isn't bad for M$.

    I would recommend the phone to anyone who likes to hack their tech. For newbies, I guess it's a bit of a struggle, but hey, they don't read Slashdot either.

    Cheers,

    Damian Lewis (porter of VNC)
    Team Netsol
    Manchester UK

    1. Re:I have an SPV - read on... by Moredhel · · Score: 1

      "Try all that on any other phone."

      OK, the P800 does all this but the video, and doesn't crash doing it. Plus it has a bigger screen and an easier-to-use OS. And the battery lasts longer.

  65. Old news in Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why all this about a mobile version that's now 6 months old?

    The new version (Tanager a.k.a Qtek 7070) is smaller, longer battery life, lighter, better software, and is already available in Finland, Sweden, Honk Kong and coming to Australia this month?

    Old news? What about a review of the new one?

    1. Re:Old news in Slashdot? by MoDaCo · · Score: 1

      The Qtek7070 (I have one), is slightly bigger, has the same battery (hence same battery life), is no lighter, and has the same software.

      The difference is a nicer keypad and a much brighter screen!

      P

      Paul O'Brien - Founder / Admin - MoDaCo SmartPhone - http://smartphone.MoDaCo.com

      --
      Paul O'Brien - Founder / Admin - MoDaCo SmartPhone - http://smartphone.MoDaCo.com
  66. I have a pretty smart Motorola. by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

    I Have a 2 year old Motorola Accompli A008. I just bought it new the other day although it's been available for more than 2 years.
    It's got a monochrome touch screen with all the normal PDA and phone functions, GPRS,E-mail, WAP, Notepad, Drawing pad etc, plus it can run J2me Java apps like a full HTML browser and games and spreadsheet program. It never hangs, it doesn't have anything that I don't need. And it costs about $100.
    Now that is a SMART PHONE!
    Thanks for trying M$, but no thanks.

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  67. Yup by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Last weekend my wallet got nicked, from inside my trousers, while I was at the pub. I don't know how; I'm fairly paranoid, and that hasn't happened for years. But at least my travelcard, work id and house keys were in the other pocket, and the phone was in my bag, so the damage was limited to cash and calls to cancel cards.

  68. Another Review by neglige · · Score: 1

    by the swiss NZZ from february (sorry, in german): NZZ According to the article the phone often calls somebody else than you wanted - you want to talk to your friend, you get your boss on the line. Decide for yourself if this is acceptable for a phone :) But do not worry: "It will be fixed with the next software update" (this sentence is mentioned 5 time in the article.. go figure).

    --
    My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
  69. SPV is pretty old in the UK by Moredhel · · Score: 1

    ... And over here it now stands for "Service Pack Vehicle".

    A colleague had one, basically for free with an expensive monthly contract, that he took back after 3 days, it had crashed so often. He and I are both now proud Sony Ericsson P800 owners.

  70. IT IS NOT A BAD PHONE by mothrathegreat · · Score: 1

    [Begin_Rant]
    The sound is fine, easily as good as my 6210
    It comes with headphones for use as an mp3 player. -thats fine too
    Yes it IS a little sluggish at times but it is far from unusable
    I own one, I know what I'm talking about, it is not a bad phone.

    --
    Extended Warranty? How can I lose!
  71. The usual, innovation through theft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should check the history on this little gadget at the reg:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/287 24 .html

    to sum up, they exclusivly partnered with Sendo, then screwed them, while taking all of their stuff and using a tiwanise company for the production....

  72. I have one too... by STUARTD572 · · Score: 1

    HI all, I also have one of these phones...it was a free upgrade when my contract came up for renewal last month. So far it is the best phone i have ever used, i thought the T68 was excellent but this is so much better. Its been completely stable for me. Surfing sites over GPRS is fast. The screen quality is good. The buttons felt a little small at first but after a few days i was SMSing as fast as i used to on the T68 and nokia's. Sync'ing with my PC was a breeze, takes seconds and iteligently merged my outlook contacts to the phone contacts. There are some great games for when your traveling (including gameboy emulators). Ocassionally its slow...but in general use thats maybe only once a week. I cant remember the last time it crashed and its been turned on for about 2.5 weeks solid. Call quality is good, i couldnt tell the difference from the t68 to this. On the topic of battery life a full charge lasts about 2-3 days for me. Thats with about 45mins of calls over that period. If i dont make any calls i get 4 days of use. I have been so impressed with the phone i got one for my wife and she is happy with it too... Stu

  73. Inconsistent Operation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both myself and a work collegue have the SPV phone, and while mine behaves itself, isn't particularly slow and has only crashed once or twice, my collegue's is very slow by comparison (figure approximately 2 to 3 times the time to perform any operation), crashes regularly and frequently gets sworn at.

    Standard M$ (slightly off-topic) bashing statement: I'm wondering if M$ has pushed a 'security update' to his phone at somepoint.

    I'm seriously considering parting with some hard earned cash to go for a Sony Erricson T610 - I already use a T68i and haven't experienced any grief at all!

    Casual Observation: I have noticed a significant drop-off in battery life after 6(ish) months of use - it will only just last a day now, whereas before I'd get about 2. The update has been applied that is supposed to increase battery life etc, but its still going downhill (compared to the life/use of my T68i)

  74. I have one and... by Voxol · · Score: 1

    It rocks!

    what the guy says is true, but so much is good.

    The patch solves a lot of the problems and WAP is just missing a bookmark, the browser works.

    I love my SPV and slashdot-light works great.

    First post from anywhere!

    Oh and MSN messenger on the move rocks, even with the mini keypad (which you get used to quickly).

  75. New Acronym: OSOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OSOD!!!!

    That's orange screen of death!!

  76. Well, I've had it a while.. by Memossy · · Score: 1

    Once you tweak it and install some useful apps - such as a Task Manager. No exit commands on most programs = sluggish performance. I've had mine for about 6-7 months now and its superbly nippy having used the tweaks at Modaco - forum for Smartphones. Can't remember the last time it crashed and it plays movies, gameboy games fine. Even NetHack. :) Plus as I'm wee, I can use the buttons no problems. No audio problems for me in London/Oxford either..

  77. Good idea, needs some work by NorthWoodsman · · Score: 1

    The fact is, there aren't too many phones that let you put whatever program you want on it and it be convenient (Yes, I know about Kyocera/Palm, but have you seen those things? Now THAT's a big cell phone; my friend has one and he calls it the Zach Morris phone) This phone probably has some pretty glaring bugs, but the ideas they've set forth are pretty cool. Wait for V2.0.

    --
    1p}{ 1 sp34k |33+ +|-|e|\| p30p13 \/\/il| 8e i/\/\pr3553|)
  78. rubbish - my friend said so by mejh · · Score: 1

    My friend bought one (in the UK) about 4 months ago, and ended up selling it after a couple of weeks on ebay. He hated it. He claimed it was slow, buggy and crashed a lot.

    Now he has a Sony Ericsson P800 that he LOVES, and uses every day.

    Personally I didn't want to spend 300UKP on the p800 so I bought the Nokia 3650. It still runs similar Symbian software as the P800 and it is very nice (if a little large).

    YMMV.

  79. Easier Unlocking by akpcep · · Score: 1

    In case anyone wants an even easier way of unlocking their SPV so it can run unsigned apps (Spectrum, Game Boy Color emulators etc etc) Here's the Orange Developers link.

    --
    Hmmm.
  80. "It's from Microsoft, therefore it's crap" by xave · · Score: 1

    Said a thousand times, but worth repeatating : It's not the first smartphone, it is the first Smartphone, as in "Cell phone under MS OS "Smartphone 2002" ...

    I just wanted to point out that I own one of these phone for seven months now, it had serious flaws at first, but nearly all of them were corrected by the first software update. And, geez, I do have my explorer, I do have my registry editor, I assurely do not want to change it for some phone under PalmOs or anything where the "engine" is kept away from the user eye.

    (on another point : Linux for PocketPCs has been made running on it, but lacks the new phone specific functions)

  81. Think about the big picture by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that in addition to the power consumption of Bluetooth, there is the power consumption of the device. Bluetooth is only capable of a few megabits per second (Maybe sub-megabit? I need to check...) Either way, it's a tiny fraction of the speed of Firewire. You'll be consuming on average 100x more power when you sync because syncs will last 100x or more longer.

    Oh wait, you'll be consuming INFINITELY more power, because the iPod charges via Firewire! You've replaced a charging scheme with a current draw. Regardless of whether it's 10 amps or 1 milliamp, you've replaced the iPod's charging mechanism with a current draw, how do you propose it charges?

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Think about the big picture by Locutus · · Score: 1

      How do I propose it charges? Dilithium crystals of course. ;)

      I do agree that in some cases, a wired cradle is still needed and a good thing. Wouldn't it be cool though if the iPod had a Bluetooth interface such that when you jumped in your car to head to school, your car stereo started playing what was xmitting from your iPod. You get home and your home stereo does the same. Even when it's on the Firewire cradle(?) charging.

      Freeing yourself from wires does have an advantage IN SOME CASES. Point taken regarding charging via it's sync port.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  82. "NEW"s for nerds by XO · · Score: 1

    Anyone notice that this thing has been out for months already? What happened to NEWs being NEW?

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  83. Let's make one thing clear by inteller · · Score: 1

    This is NOT a PocketPC. This is a pale shadow of a full fledged PDA. Smaller? yeah sure....but this thing sucks for doing anything beyond kepping contacts and making calls. If that's all you need then get another phone. These things are weak.

    1. Re:Let's make one thing clear by rjasmin · · Score: 1

      SPV sux. period. I work as a journalist in Croatian IT magazine, and I had to review SPV when it was available on this part of the market. Come to think of it, it never was available to general public, it was review only, they later decided not to go public. Anyway, phone sux. I had more than a few phones in my hands and this is the only one to have "busy icon" as an almost constant feature.
      And it kept crashing after around 30% of the calls. OTA updates are dependant on the operator making them available, and I dont think that an average phone user is used to having to constantly be on the lookout for new patches.

      bottomline: It doesnt work as a phone.

  84. Re:Poor Audio? What's the point then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have had one of these for awhile now and, oddly enough, while the voice call audio quality isn't very good, mp3s sound fine. I now use my SPV with a 256Mb SD card full of mp3s as my primary mobile music device.

  85. so are other phones by lpret · · Score: 1

    I have the Nokia 3595 and it runs slow at parts too. It can run Java, but it struggles when pulling up complex menus and the like. It seems to me that the problem is the hardware isn't expecting all of that work!

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  86. P800 0wnz0rzz (quickie rejoinder) by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    Bah humbug, the SonyEricsson P800 pisses all over these so-called smartphones.

    Apple QT6.3's .3gp support lets me make decent copies of my divx rips, and even without 3gpp explicit support the P800 will play 192x144 @ 15fps MPEG4/MPEG4 video.

    but 3gpp comes to about 13MB for 29mins of video, good enough for a subway ride.

    Also, iSync finally syncs addressbooks for it (calendar info "coming soon").

    Its jot HWR is not as good as Newton's, but it understands my printing, once I figured out why writing on the top of the screen was in all uppercase and on the bottom was lowercase.

    Mame works, without sound it is tolerable, with sound it is sl-l-o-o-o-w. The games are pretty good IMHO, particularly the driving ('Hard Drivin'-like) game.

    The only nasty flaw is its use of memory stick duo, which is a hard-to-find proprietary format. It goes up to 128mb, but still it's an annoyance.

    Range is a smidge better than T68, which is another caveat.

    It doesn't seem to know how to do SMTPS properly, and you run either imap/pop and smtp over ssl, or none over ssl.

    TIAFN..

    1. Re:P800 0wnz0rzz (quickie rejoinder) by jo42 · · Score: 1
      > P800 POSM

      Too small to be useful, too big to be a suppository...

  87. Re:he's clueless... or not by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had a Psion 5MX (uses a version of the Symbian OS) for about 5 years. It went about 3 years without crashing and I used it every day. Other people have reported similar or better experiences with the version of the Symbian OS built into phones. Seems to me that this is cause to suggest that Symbian phone is likely to be more stable than an MS based phone.

    What idiot modded this as a troll. As an ex Psion Revo+ owner, I have to say that the EPOC OS (now known as Symbian) is the most stable, polished OS I have ever used. I can't remember having to reboot my Psion, EVER.

    Saying that MS phones crash and Symbian phones crash is like saying "Windows 98 crashes and Solaris crashes". Yeah the statement may be true, but it's deliberately misleading. In reality, the two products aren't even in the same league as far as stability goes.

    Example of people discussing Symbian's reliability:
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=42924&threshol d=-1&commentsort=0&tid=100&mode=thread&pid=4501603

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
  88. Microsoft the Didn't Make These! by Jagasian · · Score: 1

    Weren't these phones the ones that Microsoft stole from a British company, by making them a partner, and then turning around and killing their company?

  89. crashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i friend of mine got one. it crashed. she lost her address book.

  90. Missed the point by bstadil · · Score: 1
    Maybe I didn't articulated so well what I meant.

    The name Apple has no connection to a computer so there is no meaning theft. Safari a little less clear cut, since it piggy backs on Explorer.

    It is not only MS that does this, Example Netscape Navigator. Navigator is a perfectly discriptive name, and you understand pretty much exactly what it does from the name alone.

    Navigator however is a good english word and should not be trademark protected. Put a Name in front like Netscape then it is ok, just as Miscrosoft Explorer is ok, but not just Explorer by itself.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  91. SPV Stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.spvnews.com is the best actual site to find infos / patchs on this phone, whos is out in France since a few month

  92. Virus! by Snaller · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just imagine when the vira start spreading on this. When you are not using it, the phone is busy phoning outer mongola and sending obscene messages to the president!

    (Why this review now? It's an oooold phone around here...)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  93. I had one ages ago - it wass crap by rhs98 · · Score: 1

    I had one of these in the UK on Orange when they came out:

    It was ok, but it had one MAJOR flaw: You could not install any software which was not signed by Orange. This limited its usefulness so it went back within my 14-day period.

    Camera quality was rubbish, MP3 was ok, GPRS was pretty nippy (but of not much use for downloading software).

    Main problems were the cost of data/mb and the software installation problem. Also the phone is big, at least compared to most UK phones.

    I have been informed there is a "fix" availible to the phone - but this is not something the majority of you will be able to get, and is not supported by the newtork operators. However the network does not have to lock the phone down in this way - most here do, to save on support calls when people shaft the phones up (apparently, but its probably to charge for a developer sig).

    Verdict- Get a P800 instead.

  94. Re:Poor Audio? What's the point then? by rhs98 · · Score: 1

    I have had one, the MP3 quality and general call qualitiy is normal compared to most high end phones and small mp3 players

  95. not afraid picture by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    the reviewer certainly isn't ashamed of the way he looks... what is he, the spokesmodel for the Orange SPV?

    "I'm so pretty, oh so pretty..."

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  96. The common misconception regarding WAP and GPRS by ozric99 · · Score: 1
    However, it's audio quality is fantastic for such a small device, it was in fact the main reason I bought it, as for WAP? Why does anyone even comment on that any more, WAP is useless anyway. The SPV has regular internet access via GPRS, and that works perfectly (it shrinks the images and everything), much better than WAP.

    GPRS isn't a replacement for WAP. WAP is the protocol. GPRS is the connection method.

    Saying GPRS is better than WAP is like saying ADSL is better than HTTP.

  97. old old old news by kitty_goth · · Score: 1

    This phone has been out for months in Europe, and has been universally panned. It's basically non-functional as a phone, the early versions of the firmware crash every other incoming call, the vaunted features are chrome upon chrome while it lacks even basic functionality. It's a dog, and MS have proved it by failing to meet even a fraction of their ship targets. Steer clear.

  98. Re:Poor Audio? What's the point then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw this thing. Get a real smartphone.

  99. Re:he's clueless... or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who modded this misinformed shite up? Brand names are trademarks, not copywritten text.

    Howard either fucked up the announcement, or he fucked up the trademark.

    Microsoft doesn't own the trademark "Smartphone" They own specifically "WINDOWS POWERED SMARTPHONE", which isn't the same thing and doesn't preclude any other smartphone from being referred to with an uppercase S.

  100. Re:he's clueless... or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cannot copyright a name. Perhaps they have trademarked it, but this is an entirely different thing.

    They didn't. Grandparent is a lying fuck.

  101. lots of features but poor performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hardly a surprise from Microsoft.

    When will these dolts get it. Make it work, then if you must, add features, and if the features break the core functionality, then either fix it, or scrap that feature.

    Man, the only thing I hate worse than MS are the people who value a prodcut by how many features it has over how well it actually works.

  102. UK - US translation by jdfox · · Score: 1

    "Piece of shit" = bad
    "Piece of piss" = good :-)

  103. Don't buy it ! by dutoitc · · Score: 1

    I tested it.
    It freeze on boot sequence 50% of the times; the menus are really slow;
    you need to upgrade it every week !

    Don't buy it !

  104. the actual news here by aka-ed · · Score: 1

    It's the Sendo lawsuit against Orange over IP theft. http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/59/31059.html The really interesting aspect is that Sendo is suing the little guy, Orange, for something that they previously said was the work of Microsoft (stealing their technology). The court case will be very interesting if the would-be DRM kingpin is made out to be an IP thief.

    --
    I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    1. Re:the actual news here by aka-ed · · Score: 1
      Clickable link (and more reliable source):

      Sendo Lawsuit.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07