Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Mars, Linksys, Torrent

Slashback tonight brings updates and followups on several recent Slashdot postings. Among other things, Linksys says they're not violating the GPL, and Tiger Direct says that Michael Robertson's claims about Microsoft targeting Lindows buyers are way off base. Speaking of which, Microsoft has decided it makes more sense to embrace schools than to alienate them with hard-nosed licensing policies on donated PCs. Also, a torrent file for the Red Hat 9 version of Ximian's latest desktop, and more. Read on for the details.

Fork carefully or be forked preemptively. BSD Forums writes "The leader of the open-source JBoss Java application server environment said that if the group of developers that left his organization attempts to splitâ"or "fork" as it's called in the industryâ"the JBoss code base, he would sue them. Marc Fleury, president of JBoss Group LLC, Atlanta, said he is prepared to take legal action if the group of developers who left the JBoss Group to form a new company, known as Core Developers Network LLC, attempts to diverge from the JBoss code base."

They can learn in the classroom, or outside it. MVP writes "Fridrik "frisk" Skulason, of F-Prot fame (you know, that good old DOS free for personal use antivirus, up-to-date & usable for windows), has a very acid reaction against the decision of University of Calgary to start teaching virus-writing classes (see previous Slashdot thread)."

Just let me control the textbooks ... After a few stories like this one, it may please some people to see at least a partial turnaround from Microsoft on computers donated to schools without Windows licenses. Patrick Cable II writes "I got an interesting letter from Microsoft today at work. Microsoft has started a "Fresh Start" program for educational instutions that basically makes it so schools who have had computers donated to them without licenses or media can get media and a letter stating the computer is licensed to use a Windows operating system (98 or 2000). More information can be found here. Anyone think they're trying to figure out a way to deal with the whole Linux thing?"

Software in the Public Interest has yet to respond with a lower licensing fee for Debian.

More fun than "The Winds of War." For fans of Kim Stanley Robinson, space exploration and colonization, space elevators et cetera, reader Unbeliever writes with new that Hurd will soon meet Mars. "No, not GNU/Hurd, but Gale Ann Hurd. Hurd just signed a deal with Sci-Fi to produce Kim Stanley Robinson's Red Mars as a Sci-Fi 6-hour miniseries. Red Mars is the first of the Robinson's Red/Green/Blue Mars Trilogy, an 'almost plausible sci-fi' future-history approach about Colonizing and Terraforming Mars. The trilogy looks at the technological, sociological, personal, and political challenges of terraforming a different planet. Also of interest to Slashdotters in general is Robinson's ideas on the growth of multi-national corporations into Meta-Nations, and their effects on world politics."

But doesn't that make it radio their way? In the recent Radio Your Way review, our reviewer said of the device that it had "[n]o off button! As far as I can tell, once you turn the device on there is no way to manually turn it off other than to wait for it to enter sleep mode after several minutes. Very annoying."

Another reader writes with this workaround: "In any mode, hold down the stop button (a little square under the play button) for 2-3 seconds to turn off the unit. This is listed in the manual, which you are right, is a very poorly done Korean effort."

Calm down that jerking knee, then apply ice. In response a post which raised the question of whether Linksys was in violation of the GPL by not distributing, nor offering links to, the source code for the software controlling their 802.11g base stations. A representative from Linksys-PR sent in this note about the "missing" source code:

Linksys is a strong proponent of both Linux and the Open Source movement. The code within our routers is using User Space code without linking dynamically or statically to any GPL (GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE) code. Any code which does not have a static or dynamic link to anything covered by the General Public License is not GPL'ed, and can be considered closed source.

We regret it took some time to respond to this posting. To assure timely responses to inquiries like this in the future, please use the following procedure which complies with the requirements of the General Public License:

1. Please put your request in writing or in an email addressed to info@Linksys.com
2. You have to request the code for the specific modules you want. It is not valid to issue a request for any "code you may be using."
3. Technically, you are also supposed to provide us with a self-addressed stamped envelope, along with funds to cover the cost of providing the code to you. But Linksys will handle requests on a case-by-case basis. Thank you."

Straight from the Tiger's mouth. Tiger Direct Executive Vice President Richard Wallet wrote to contradict Michael Robertson's claims that Microsoft was targeting Tiger Direct customers who purchased Lindows systems to offer them steep discounts on Windows XP. Wallet writes:

"TigerDirect is not selling any version of Windows for $50. We are selling Microsoft Windows XP just like any other reseller and we are in compliance with all of Microsoft's licensing agreements, no better, no worse, and no different.

TigerDirect does sell low-cost systems with the Lindows operating system. TigerDirect also sells low-cost systems with Microsoft Windows XP. TigerDirect even sells systems with NO operating systems. The only parties who can tell us which products are or aren't worth selling are our customers. Neither Microsoft nor Lindows has a significant influence on what we buy and sell. We aim to serve our customers with the products they want at the very best values available and world-class customer service.

TigerDirect did in fact perform a survey of its customers as it does on a regular basis. Contrary to the author's claim, this survey was not only sent to Lindows buyers. It was sent to everybody who bought systems from TigerDirect during a specific time period. The purpose of the survey was to help us better serve the needs of our customers by getting a better understanding of what they're using the systems for, what they're running on them, and why they purchased what they did. The result of the survey is going to be to help us better align our PC product mix to increase sales."

Many monkeys make slick visuals. IamTheRealMike writes "Hi all, there is a BitTorrent of the XD2 RPMs for Red Hat 9 available, please be gentle with it. It comes as a directory that contains a readme and an ISO - make sure you read the readme first as there is a bug in the installer you need to know about. When all is done and you've read the instructions, just mount the ISO using the loopback device and point the installer at it. For all those who have been trying and failing to get it using the mirror network, this might provide a useful alternative."

344 comments

  1. License protection? by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Marc Fleury, president of JBoss Group LLC, Atlanta, said he is prepared to take legal action

    JBoss is open source... doesn't the license protect the guys that walked out? Does this mean that Mr. Fleury will sue me as well if I do a JBoss knockoff?

    1. Re:License protection? by zmooc · · Score: 1

      I know nothing more of this than you do so I may be wrong but I think there probably was something in their employment contracts that would make this possible. It's pretty normal to have some sort of non-concurreny-clause (or what it's called in english) in a contract.

      --
      0x or or snor perron?!
    2. Re:License protection? by ctid · · Score: 5, Informative

      He's prepared to take legal action if the guys who walked out fork the code and call the new product JBoss. I understand the Fleury's organization has trademarked "JBoss".

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    3. Re:License protection? by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Possible. But I wonder how "based on JBoss" or "from the original developers of JBoss" would fly in that situation. After all, if you're taking GPL'ed code (or any other type of license for open software) and aggregating it to create your own (obviously open) software solution, you can't help but say "this is based on the code for product X".

    4. Re:License protection? by ralatalo · · Score: 1

      If you call it JBoss he will.... if you call it something else, no....

      OR that is the jist that I got from my reading.

    5. Re:License protection? by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 1

      It really depends on what he sues them for. Depending on what their contract with his company was, this could just be a simple breach of contract issue.

      I know that my contract currently doesn't allow me to try recruiting my co-workers if I was to leave. Perhaps leaving together violated something similiar.

    6. Re:License protection? by mkettler · · Score: 1

      Just FYI, In English (at least in the US) they are typically called "non-compete" agreements.

      The meaning of your message was clear enough anyway, but since you weren't sure what they were called, I figured I'd add a note.

      --
      -Matt
    7. Re:License protection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I always thought that was a terrible name anyway. I'd call their product "J2Free-e"

    8. Re:License protection? by rimu+guy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sure what Mr Fleury means is that he owns the JBoss trademark (it is a trademark, see the little â in the logo?), just like Linus owns the Linux trademark.

      If the Core developer group forks the code, then they JBoss LLC would be within thier rights to prevent the Core Developer Network using the trademark.

      The CDN guys would have to come up with their own name for the app server.

      They should be able to do it sucessfully. And it would be another case of history repeating itself. JBoss used to be called EJBoss, but Sun stomped on them for using _their_ EJB trademark.

    9. Re:License protection? by hackus · · Score: 1

      I am not so sure.

      My take on it, and I don't pretend to know both sides:

      Some guy wants to be a partner after being at a company, for only 8 months, and only has what 6 customers?

      I would say the guy is out of his mind, has no business sense, is unreasonable, or has an ego the size of Bill Gates Estate.

      Let me tell you, that is one big ego.

      Partner in the classic sense, means you bring something to the table nobody else has contributed to the company, that adds a great deal of economic value to the company.

      That normally means something you can't get from hiring an employee.

      If he had like 100 customers, or invested a million into the business, perhaps.

      Being a partner isn't all what it is cracked up to be either...as the saying goes, becareful what you wish for.

      For me, when I was upset with the last place I worked, working 80 hours a week, I left to be my own boss.

      Now I get to work 80 hours a week, except I get to yell at myself for stupid things I do.

      No wonder half the people I work with think I am nuts all the time, talking to myself.

      That boss of mine is not only a whip cracker, he has high standards too! :-)

      -Hack

      --
      Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    10. Re:License protection? by d3faultus3r · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or you could follow linksys's lead and not mention it at all.

      --
      read my blog
      musings on politics and technol
    11. Re:License protection? by packeteer · · Score: 1

      Isn't this one of the main benefits of open source work? Isn't the point to encourage developers to work on quality open source code that they can later advertise as their work. I thought this was how developers could be compensated for their work. I know if i work on an open source project and leave it to start my own project i would tell everyone i can what i worked on.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    12. Re:License protection? by incom · · Score: 1

      Just call it JBX. The X addition always means better.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    13. Re:License protection? by jtcm · · Score: 1

      how 'bout callin it:

      "The Software Formerly Known a JBoss" ...I seem to recall this working for a certain mu51c14n (whose name escapes me at the moment ;-)

      --
      @ASP.NET's parent-teacher meeting: "Little Johnny.NET is very bright, but he doesn't play well with others."
    14. Re:License protection? by jtcm · · Score: 1

      oops...I got that wrong...

      I meant "i seem 2 re call this werking 4 a serten musishun."

      --
      @ASP.NET's parent-teacher meeting: "Little Johnny.NET is very bright, but he doesn't play well with others."
    15. Re:License protection? by pcraven · · Score: 1

      So would "XBoss" refer to a branch of JBoss, or would it refer to Fleury their ex-boss?

  2. Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Please put your request in writing or in an email addressed to info@Linksys.com

    I think that you forgot something, or the post office got way more efficient.

    --
    You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    1. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Durin_Deathless · · Score: 1

      Even better, you have to ask for a specific module. How do I know what to ask for if I don't know first? I can'nt(see above) just ask for 'everything'.

      --
      You should use AdiumX on your Mac.
    2. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Fzz · · Score: 5, Interesting
      It's amazing what will get there, so long as the address is unique. I once addressed a postcard to:
      username@sun.com
      Sun Microsystems,
      California, USA
      I couldn't remember either how to spell my friend's surname, or her address, but could remember her email address. And it reached her in a couple of days.
    3. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should have used bangpaths.

    4. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      My roommate once got a package addressed to her (misspelled) name at our city.. no address.. I was very impressed that it actually arrived and wasn't very much delayed. The USPS truely isn't that bad.. depending where you are. I have horror stories in some locales but a lot of places it does a great job.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    5. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by C32 · · Score: 1

      That has nothing to do with the USPS and everything to do with the mail handling at sun..

    6. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my town there is a fish farm. They give away bumper stickers that say, "Eat My Fish."

      A man I knew (from the same town) used to always send letters to the fish farm with just, "Eat My Fish" as the address...they always got there. I was always impressed.

    7. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by dschl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My mother-in-law delivers mail in a small town of about 5,000 people. My favourite post-office story is from a few years ago, when they received an envelope with a child's handwriting on the outside. The envelope contained only two words on the outside - "Mom", and the name of the small town.

      The post office staff figured it out, and the mail went through. I think they used the postmark, which identified the city from which it was sent, and successfully guessed which divorced / separated woman had children living in that city.

      --
      Slashdot - the place where you can look like a genius by restating the obvious
    8. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by mlk · · Score: 1

      Back when I was a kid, the 3-5 o'clock cartoons on BBC 1 where presented by an irratating bloke and a puppet of a hamster in a broom closit.

      A letter addressed to
      The irratating bloke and his hamster
      The broom closit.

      was delivered OK ;)

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    9. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Jonner · · Score: 1

      That's for sure. I grew up in third world countries, so the USPS has always seemed perfect to me. It's not, but I've never seen it fail.

    10. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      The worst place I've seen the USPS function was in Miami.. they lost LOTS of my mail and even certified packages. Everywhere else it's been anywhere from okay to great. I've dealt a lot with mail and shipping in other countries so I can appreciate what you saw about other countries mail systems. :)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    11. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a good example of the contrast. In the places I grew up, if one wanted reliable delivery, one had something sent to an address in Miami, and a courier took it from there. The school I attended when I was in elementary in Paramaribo, Suriname even had its official address in Miami and a continuous, established service to deliver mail from that address to the school. People associated with the school were also able to use it for some stuff.

      Here in the US, Miami is an example of poor service, based on what you've said.

    12. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      For really good USPS service get yourself a PO Box in a small town outside a big city. That way mail comes and goes pretty fast but doesn't get lost in the local system. My local post office currently (in rural Arkansas) isn't to fast but they have terrific service and the price for a PO Box is significantly less than in a big city. It's probably the nicest looking/functioning post office I've yet seen.

      Miami I think has a lot of problem with the local system because it lost about half my mail and when I tried to come in to pick up packages they couldn't find them most of the time. I think things get to the locale but they didn't always make it into my hands from there. I also noticed it depended on my local carrier. For a while I had a guy who'd swipe my mail. It probably did not help that I tended to get rather racey pictures in the mail. A lot of those disappeared.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    13. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stories like that remind of the good people in the world.
      Tell your mother-in-law she made someone smile.

      Posting anon.to protect my hard bitten and cynical reputation. ;)

    14. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by u38cg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A few years ago, in mid-January, my mother received a Christmas card - a bit late, but given that the only thing written on the envelope was her name, we forgave them.

      I suppose it helps that only a dozen people in the UK have our surname, but even so, it must be tempting to just chuck such items away.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    15. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After of course, they opened it looking for cash or anything useful for themselves to keep.

    16. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by larien · · Score: 1

      The UK Post Office pride themselves on getting stuff delivered, no matter how obscure the address is; they come in for a lot of stick, but they still deliver most letters within a day or two across the UK (even to the small islands in the Hebrides) for a standard price.

    17. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      My parents are from Deventer, a 80,000 people town in the Netherlands. There used to be a guy there nicknamed "Gekke Gijs" (Mad Gijs).

      They sent a postcard addressed "Gekke Gijs, Deventer" from Austria, and it arrived without trouble :-).

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    18. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gordon was a gopher, not a hamster.

    19. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by isorox · · Score: 1

      While the post office is working out which "John Smith" to send a letter too is good, surely they should sort out the missing 500,000 letters/week?

    20. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Deep+Penguin · · Score: 1

      One summer when I was on a study-abroad program, I received a letter addressed with only my name, and the town I was in (Ancient Corinth).

      I was rather surprised that it made it to me.

    21. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, with Total Information Awareness, why even bother with envelopes?

    22. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps this seems odd here in the states. But I here in places like Ireland just a name will be needed.

    23. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      I'm guessing that the U.S. Postal Service doesn't deserve too much of the credit for getting that postcard to your friend. Most likely they just identified an arbitrary Sun office location and delivered the card there, and it was the Sun mailroom staff and inter-office mail couriers that did the rest.

      Wow, this is offtopic even for a Slashback.

    24. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      My best, FOAF story:

      Friend got a letter that was to him, but the envelope was addressed:
      kpjm d,oyj
      234 smu dy/
      n;pp,omhypm ,m

      But somehow he got it. It took him a while to realise the addy was
      John Smith
      123 Any St.
      Bloomington MN
      typed with one's fingers one key to the right on the keyboard. But someone at the USPO figured it out & delivered it correctly.

      --
      -Styopa
    25. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Years ago, my boss got mail addressed to

      BT
      Cold Bay, Alaska

    26. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by n3m6 · · Score: 1

      to the people who make it happen
      even though nobody knows, or cares

      they are truly great

    27. Re:Put your questions in writing or e-mail by mlk · · Score: 1

      you scare me.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  3. Why package RPMs as an ISO? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    BitTorrent can distribute directories of files, so why add the extra obfuscation?

    1. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by TummyX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Cause then you know you have an *exact* copy of the CD. I hated having to download individual files cause you'd never know if you got them all properly. Try running an MD5 sum on 10000 files.

    2. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by kyoko21 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, bittorrent performs a check sum for you during download so you don't have to MD5SUM all 1000 or so RPMS.

    3. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by parkanoid · · Score: 4, Informative

      BT checks file integrity by SHA1 hashing; MD5ing the files is redundant, unless you do not trust the original seed.

    4. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      I don't trust Bit Torrents file integrity checking. I downloaded several linux ISO's from bit torrent and checked them against the MD5, they failed.

      Maybe I forgot that I didn't finish the download, I don't remember. I'm pretty sure that I did though.

    5. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This will help check the md5 on a bunch of files..

      http://md5deep.sourceforge.net/

    6. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahah, Damn right!

      That was awesome!

    7. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by lmfr · · Score: 1
      Bittorrent creates and truncates the files it will download at the expected final size, making them look like as if they were already download.

      Note that in Unix like systems those files will initially still occupy only zero bytes and will grow as more is downloaded.

      If you have a file you don't know if the download had finished, just re-download it using bittorrent. If it's complete, it will say so.

    8. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by lmfr · · Score: 1
      Interesting.

      But the recursive part can easily be accomplished with a

      find dir -type f -print0 | xargs -0 md5sum
    9. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a file you don't know if the download had finished, just re-download it using bittorrent. If it's complete, it will say so.

      Wow, that's pretty sophisticated...

    10. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That troll sucked ass. Do a google for the BSD troll and freaking do it right, cockmonger.

    11. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Because bittorrent works better on one large file then on a crudload of smaller files?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Why package RPMs as an ISO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then use rsync. it will automatically fix any corruption, it is even robust enough to handle inserting a block of data which ofsets the rest of the file. wow hey!

  4. What is xd2? by m0nkyman · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is XD2, or is this something that all the cool kids know about, and I don't, so you won't tell me, because I'm not one of the cool kids, and by the way here's my lunch money, please dont't hax0r my box, I didn't say nothing to you, please?

    --
    ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    1. Re:What is xd2? by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      Ximian Desktop (I'm assuming, based on the monkeys comment).

      See more here

    2. Re:What is xd2? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, it's eXtreem Deathmatch 2, a new multiplayer mod for Halflife 2.

      Why aren't you playing it right now!?

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    3. Re:What is xd2? by Aloekak · · Score: 1

      My guess would be "Ximian Desktop 2"

    4. Re:What is xd2? by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      I was really dissapointed 2 seconds later :( when I realized:

      1. Half life 2 is not out yet.
      2. Half life 2 is not out for linux (yet, if they hope me to buy it).

  5. Sickening by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    Speaking of which, Microsoft has decided it makes more sense to embrace schools

    Kids beware, Microsoft now embraces schools. Learn to recognize Microsoft employees : they're the funny-looking people with long raincoats waiting for you outside the school.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Sickening by csguy314 · · Score: 2, Funny

      MSPusher: Psst... Hey kid. [opens trench-coat, displaying many install cd's] You want a copy of Microsoft Office?
      Innocent Youth: Ummm, I don't know. I hear that stuff can be dangerous.
      MSP: All the cool kids are using it. You want to be cool doncha?
      IY: Well...
      MSP: Tell you what, I'll give you this copy of Office for free. All you have to do is sign this license...

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
  6. contradiction? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    Didn't the last linksys article say that new drivers HAD been linked with the kernel? Which is correct?

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:contradiction? by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Just send an anonymous tip to SCO. We'll find out in court...

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    2. Re:contradiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Dynamically) linking closed-source drivers to the Linux kernel is not a GPL violation. Note that this is because Linus has specifically clarified that it is so, the GPL could be, and usually is, interpreted to cover dynamic linking.

  7. JBoss fork - misleading headline by ninjaz · · Score: 5, Informative
    Quoth the article:

    "I did think about them forking," Fleury said. "If they fork JBoss, that's another problem. If there's a new JBoss, if they fork it and call it JBoss I would sue them. There is only one version that we control."

    So, a suit was only threatened in the case the forked version used the same name as the original (presumably on trademark grounds).

    1. Re:JBoss fork - misleading headline by fm6 · · Score: 1
      To be fair, Fleury was a little muddled about that point. Perhaps he was reluctant to come right out and admit that he has no legal hold on the Core people unless the infringe the JBoss trademark.

      It's interesting to note that the trademark currently belongs to Fleury personally. The USPTO trademark database he registered it a couple years ago. Before that, it belonged to a California company called Telkel, which appears to be defunct.

      Oh wait, Fleury registered the trademark in 2001, but cites "first use" a year earlier. This is perfectly legitimate (its use that establishes your ownership of a trademark, not registration) except that in 2000 Telkel was still in business. IANAL, but I'd guess that the Core people could challenge Fleury's ownership of the trademark if they wanted to. Probably not worth the hassle though.

      It's also interesting to note that the jboss.org domain belongs to JBoss Group LLC, "a privately-held services company". Not, as the .org suggest, a voluntary alignment of open-source zealots.

    2. Re:JBoss fork - misleading headline by OMG · · Score: 2, Informative

      Telkel was Marc's first try to make money for a living.
      Telkel failed. Marc didn't give up, stayed with open source and continued the work on JBoss.
      When JBoss.org has been registered in the past there didn't exist such a thing as the commercial service company "JBoss Group". In the early days of JBoss Group they had a separate "area" on JBoss.org (or even their own domain, can't remember). Today JBoss.org does attract a lot of people, so they want to leverage that for the commercial service group. As a result the domain jboss.org was transfered from Marc to the JBoss Group LLC.

      Remember: The developers that are part of JBoss Group are still developing HEAD and fixing bugs on it for free. The code is released under LGPL and thus safe from being bought by MS.

    3. Re:JBoss fork - misleading headline by fm6 · · Score: 1

      So Fleury founded both Telkel and JBoss Group? That's interesting, since Telkel was in California and JG is in Georgia.

  8. JBoss Certification Hassles by sbszine · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've said this before (when the original article was posted), but I still suspect the JBoss split is related to their Sun certification troubles.

    There's an interesting ZDnet article here that talks about JBoss not being 100% kosher J2EE, and the main group's ongoing dispute with Sun. I think that the breakaway group intendeds to fork JBoss to make a more easily certified version, and this Slashback seems to support that somewhat.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

    1. Re:JBoss Certification Hassles by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The cert. hassles might have helped raise tempers. But leaving JBoss won't make it any easier for these guys to get their code certified. Well, maybe a little, if you assume the working relationship between Fleury and his developers went sour. Java certification is a pretty controversial area right now, and there's a lot to suggest that Sun's process is pretty arbitrary.

      The Slashdot story and the Blog buzz all say this is about a bunch of developers wanting their own JBoss fork. The Core Developers party line is that they just don't want to be tied to JBoss to the exclusion of competing products. Any other explanations?

      Probably there's some truth to all these stories.

    2. Re:JBoss Certification Hassles by sbszine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, according to Sun, the reason they won't certify JBoss is just that JBoss won't cough up the (reasonable) money for testing. Core Developers might be more inclined to pay if they create their own fork.

      Probably Sun will be the real winner as this encourages one fork or the other to give them some cash money. More bling bling gold chains for McNealy : )

      --

      Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

    3. Re:JBoss Certification Hassles by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Good point. But I doubt if Scott is going to rush to the jeweler. Sun has spent a fortune developing and promoting Java, and on failed Java-based businesses. It'll take a lot more than a few certification fees for the whole thing to show anything like a profit!

    4. Re:JBoss Certification Hassles by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see McNealy show up to the next linux world with a penguin suit, and several very bling bling gold chains.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  9. Red Mars... by bad_fx · · Score: 1

    This is great news. I really enjoyed the whole trilogy. Maybe a bit slow to start with, but once you get into them it's a great read.

    Finally (I hope) a good Movie (well, miniseries) about the red planet. (mission to mars anyone? blergh)

    hmmm... A quick google reveals that Gale Ann Hurd also produced Virus, Armageddon along with the Hulk and T3 as the article says. Make what you will of that I guess...

    1. Re:Red Mars... by lovemayo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I really love the books. I've just started on Green Mars(the 2nd book) now, and I am about 150 pages into it. I really look forward to this series... Hope it'll turn out as good as the books. Too bad we don't have SciFi channel here in norway, so I'll have to find another way to see it

    2. Re:Red Mars... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      There is always Kazaa or BitTorrent...

    3. Re:Red Mars... by bfree · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they can really do the Mars series justice in an 18 hour mini-series? The one thing that impressed me so much about the Mars books is the depth. Not only do you have the stories of the individual charectors, but also we have the politics of both planets and their codependence aswell as the scientific politics. It'll be fun to see, but with it coming from someone who made Armageddon I imagine that the mega-corp aspects and other political/social/scientific areas of the books will be dropped to make a more instantly atractive action/drama series and removing the cerebral interest! Pity, but maybe I'll be completely wrong!

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

    4. Re:Red Mars... by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good god, listen to yourself.

      If Jackson can do LotR decently in 6 hours, I think 18 will be enough for Red/Green/Blue Mars. The first three Dune books are just as voluminous, and SciFi did them well in 12.

    5. Re:Red Mars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, my friend, be *glad* you don't have the Sci Fi Channel where you are.

      Trust me.

    6. Re:Red Mars... by Danborg · · Score: 1

      I agree, the series was slow to start, but once I got into it, it was a very enjoyable read. It should translate well to the screen, since it is often easier to simply show something to the viewer, than to try to describe it to the reader.

    7. Re:Red Mars... by praedor · · Score: 1

      Bah. I read them and thought that the books Mars and its sequel Return to Mars

      was far more believable and interesting. I THINK they were written by Bova but at this moment cannot swear on it.
      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    8. Re:Red Mars... by bfree · · Score: 1

      Well firstly Jackson is doing LotR in about 10 hours (or so) and in doing that he has cut quite a lot of stuff out to simplify things to fit into the film. LotR is also a shorter "book" then the RGB Mars and LotR also has a considerable amount of descriptive/emotive text where the adage of "a picture's worth a thousand words" makes it wasier for Jackson. Finally RGB Mars develops the evolution of an entire planet and culture, LotR uses the remaining works of Tolkien to do that so the films really deal with just the surface story with some hints to the bigger picture. Perhaps I'm talking arse, but I truly do wonder just how easy it will be to preserve the depth of RGB Mars, even in 18 hours! BTW I've never read Dune or seen the SciFi channels version.

      --

      Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  10. One more thing by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Tiger Direct Executive Vice President Richard Wallet wrote to contradict Michael Robertson's claims

    Here's a revolutionary idea. Instead of posting hysterical flamebait stories to the front page, how about you do your homework before the fact? Is it so difficult to email the guy beforehand and ask him for the real story? You sit on submissions for days sometimes, so how problematic would this be?

    I know that posting another "M$ is doing evil" story contributes to the bottom line with all the ad impressions and whatnot, but taken as a whole your FUD is no better than Microsoft's. And that puts you on the same ethical bandwagon.

    1. Re:One more thing by Wonko42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've tried on numerous occasions to contact TigerDirect regarding gaping security holes in their site, and I've never received a response. Perhaps the only reliable way to get a response from them is to post a story on Slashdot.

    2. Re:One more thing by asscroft · · Score: 1

      No kidding. And MS is one of /.'s (biggest?)advertisers. Ha.

      On the other hand, at least they do a /back. How many "news" outlets never follow up in any meaningful way. Sunday night at 3am they list all their mistakes that week, in spanish no less. Or stuff it on page 4 in the bottom left corner. Or never do it at all.

      --
      because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
    3. Re:One more thing by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      To a certain extent yes, but that doesn't balance the scales. Balancing the scales would be to post another front page story with the real facts. Hiding it in a /back does not work. The original "OMG M$ IS TEH SUX" story gets 200,000 reads, this one gets 2,000.

    4. Re:One more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're guys who run a freakin web site, not reporters.

    5. Re:One more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, shut your fucking hole, you daft cunt.

    6. Re:One more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fuck off you pro-slashdot/open source whore. hes exactly right. slashdot is one big anti-microsoft fud site whether the story is true or not. i see alot of stories that slashdot posts about microsoft that are blatently untrue and they always end with something like "Could this be true?" not to actually imply that they might not be but to anger the reader and incite a riot against microsoft. and then after all the years i've seen false anti-microsoft stories this is the FIRST time i have ever seen slashdot retract an anti-microsoft post. go back to your parents basement - i dont want to hear from you again.

    7. Re:One more thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot advertises? Really?

      Someone needs a copy of AdShield
      http://www.adshield.org

    8. Re:One more thing by Jungle+guy · · Score: 1

      Michael Robertson made a strong claim about Microsoft and Tiger Direct. This claim is, alone, relevant information. As it has been refuted by Tiger Direct, Lindows costumers might have a different perception on the seriousness of Robertson. The judgment should be left to the public.

  11. about Linksys providing source code by narfbot · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to guy who reported Linksys possibly not providing source code, his contact within Linksys finally responded and said the lack of source with the WRT54G was unintential. His contact also said that previously they shipped their products with source code on a CD. I found this on the lkml shortly after the slashdot article.

    1. Re:about Linksys providing source code by andersen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thats fine. But as maintainer of BusyBox, which is being illegally shipped with their router without source in violation of the GPL, I had my lawyer send them a lease-compily-with-the-license letter on May 13th. Then did not respond. So I had my lawyer send them a letter letting them know we will sue them if they have not responded by June 16th. I don't care what their PR department says. I expect a proper response from their legal department or we will see them in court. I am tired of people trampling over the GPL and then giving a lame little "oops, sorry" when they get caught. When I walk into the local CompUSA, there is a isle filled with GPL violating routers. Until each of these routers includes a copy of the GPL'd sources, or includes a written offer to obtain the sources for the cost of the media, they will still be violating the GPL. They do not include the source with these routers. And they do not include a written offer for source. Therefore, they must offer source via their website to comply with the GPL. Anything less then that, and they are what microsft would term "software pirates" -- shipping software in violation of the software license agreement.

      --
      -Erik -- --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
    2. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a way to get a little more income for GPL projects. (If there is any money left after the lawyers pull out their fangs.)

    3. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Platitudes about being friends of the OS movement aside -- The 'offer' that came from their PR group isn't even close to being within the bounds of what the GPL requires. If you read their response, they're demanding that I go into their binaries and figure out which pieces of GPL code they have in the machine, and then write them with a list.

      As a (pirate, at the moment) distributer of GPL software, it's their legal responsibility to inform us about which pieces of they're using so that we can then ask them for the source code. and given that they're the ones who violate the license, I figure that they should be the ones beending over backwards to make things easier for us not the other way 'round.

      Technically: having violated the GPL, on the code in their routers, they're now GPL limbo. They have lost all rights distribute the software, and must now do whatever it takes to satisfy the GPL copyright owners that they're not going to do this again.

      I take that back.

      They have to do whatever it takes to satisfy the GPL copyright owners period. Nominally, I would expect this to be something like payment of legal fees, putting a prominent notice on their website and distributing free source CD's via all of their distributors -- but there's no reason why it couldn't include a $500K 'administrative fee' as well.

      Of course, if they keep on stonewalling, some GPL owners could just refuse permission outright.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    4. Re:about Linksys providing source code by narfbot · · Score: 1

      I agree with that. Keep at it. I was just showing that some progress has been made.

    5. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOu're right, however I doubt the is a conspirasy to secretly violate the GPL.

      More likley there not used to have to have the source ready, or they made a mistake.
      Guess what? it happens, and not just to the GPL. COuld you or your lawyer made an effort to find out what was happening or what was planned?
      Nex ttime be sure to jump on them harder, that way companies will move away from OS and the GPL.

      The courts are supposed to be a last line of defences, not an immediate reaction. Sure if you called them to get the info, and they blew you off, then you should proceed with the lawyers.

      Final, be sure to put more words in bold, it sure impresses us.

    6. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      More likley there not used to have to have the source ready, or they made a mistake.
      Whether or not they're used to the GPL has no bearing on whether or not they are required to comply with it. I mean, for fuck's sake -- it's called CYA. So little effort is required to comply with the GPL in this case, why the fuck shouldn't they?
    7. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a legal right to do that (apparently). They really should reply, apologize to you (and the other copyright holders). Forcing, by legal action, them into doing this may seem the only option, but you can force people to do what they should nicely, or you can be a dick.
      Be careful that you do not give the Free Software community as bad a name as the proprietary software (BSA etc.) by bullying.
      The BSA send in the lawyers to "protect their IP rights". And they sound like totalitarianists sending in the stormtroopers.

    8. Re:about Linksys providing source code by timbrown · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a contributor to EZ-IPUpdate, which it has alledgedly been included in LinkSys and others products, I'd like to know more. Can anyone point me at a URL giving more details of what has been discovered so far. I've only contributed about 40 lines to the EZ-IPUpdate source tree, but IMO we must do everything we can to enforce the GPL, otherwise the progress made since the founding of the FSF will have been in vain. I'm not talking about financial gain, but simply enforcing the ideals of those kind souls who contribute to the community.

      --
      Tim Brown
    9. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Really, all things considered, there isn't any reason why Linksys couldn't just use a BSD, NetBSD is more than likely suitable. So as for other works, in most cases, it's just as easy to implement the additional code for things such as IP updating.

      Personally, I would release the source to what's been released already. Then I would spend a few extra dollars on developers to make a BSD based system instead. After all, if the real guts have been done using a user mode program, then there's really no problem in porting it. If there has been some kernel mode items made as well, there's really no reason that can't be ported to BSD which often is well documented enough to do marvels in short time frames.

      I think that GPL software is worth how much I paid for it, but in the case of design wins such as LinkSys, I would definately try to sort things out nicely instead of noisy since it could simply provoke them to move away from Linux instead. This would do far more damage to the Linux community since if Linksys moved due to frustration with the GPL, then more companies are likely to see it as a problem and simply not use GPL at all.

      For Linux which is still growing and still breaking ground on market acceptance, it could be damaging if movements were made to chase corporations off instead of helping make the acceptance grow further.

      I would suspect that the best idea would be to request a conversation between a GPL knowledgable spokesperson and either a higher up manager or company lawyer at Linksys. The idea isn't to scare companies off of GPL, but instead to educate them on how to best comply to the GPL. Remember most companies are interested in doing the right thing, but when challenged with law suits and such, they may move on the defensive. After all, so far what I've heard from the previous people posting on the topic, I feel that there has been little effort to speak peacefully with Linksys and instead people immediately open conversations with threats.

      I am not from Linksys, but I do work for a company where we've had GPL problems in the past on occassion, nothing serious, but enough that we had to delay products in high demand for Linux since we were afraid we didn't meet GPL. Now we take the Linux platform less seriously and have lost interest in many ways. After all, Linux is harder to develop for, it is harder to market for, it is harder to win customers in general, and many people treat Linux and GPL in general as a religion and are in my personal oppinion dangerously phenatical about it. Now even though we've tried to comply to GPL as best as we can, we still worry that there is some loophole in GPL which people will complain about.

      A great example if you're wondering what I mean. Writing software using an LGPL'd Standard C++ Library was not allowed by our attournies since the LGPL considers "Work based on LGPL code" as code which "Must be released under GPL or LGPL", the problem is we've learned that there's a chance we could face risk of litigation because the Standard C++ library is mostly templates and using this code in your product touches on unsteady ground because you don't link to a template, instead it becomes part of your code. This set us back a few weeks and caused us to have to purchase a commercial version which didn't integrate as well due to linking issues. This meant that software which people have used and have written many nice articles about has been delayed in every version because we have to take the legal issues concerned more seriously on Linux than on any other system.

      I would generally gladly sep forward and say who I am, but I feel that the phenatics involved with this web site may not be responsible enough to judge my statements as my oppinion as opposed to the oppinion of the company I work for.

      P.S. - I'm also worried that I'll get 100,000 e-mails calling me a loser that can't even spell :)

    10. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you stupid, or just trolling? Yes he has the source code. The people who buy the routers won't though, and they won't know that they are entitled to it.

      This is something that the GPL guarantees. If you don't inform the people you distribute to, you don't have the right to distribute at all.

      As maintainer (and presumably copyright holder on some/most/all of it), he is the person in the best position to fix this. It doesn't matter that _he_ has the source code, it matters that it is _his_ copyright that is being infringed upon.

    11. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, they don't. They do have to include a copy of the GPL and a pointer to the sources though. So suck my non-busybox developer schlong, fart knocker.

    12. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      I had the same concern about libstdc++ and reported the ambiguous licence as a bug. The libstdc++ developers have since clarified that it's covered by a much less restrictive licence.

    13. Re:about Linksys providing source code by black+mariah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the GPL, section 3:
      If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code.

      Unless they modified the source for your software, they don't have to distribute it. Would you prefer that Linksys start their own distribution site, possibly with outdated versions of your software, to distribute code that is easily available directly from you? I agree that there should be a note or something in the back of the manual stating what software the router runs on and, if applicable, where to obtain it. According to the GPL, if I'm reading it correctly, an alternative to distributing the code yourself is stating where the code can be obtained (assuming no modification).

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    14. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      copied from http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=66890&cid=6145 076 BusyBox GPL violation (Score:5, Interesting) by andersen (10283) on Sunday June 08, @04:36PM (#6145076) (http://codepoet.org/) This is what I did to verify that the Linksys firmware was violating the GPL.... #!/bin/sh wget ftp://ftp.linksys.com/pub/network/WRT54G_1.02.1_US _code.bin # I noticed a GZIP signature for a file name "piggy" at offset # 60 bytes from the start, suggesting we have a compressed Linux # kernel dd if=WRT54G_1.02.1_US_code.bin bs=60 skip=1 | zcat > kernel # Noticed there was a cramfs magic signature at offset 786464 dd if=WRT54G_1.02.1_US_code.bin of=cramfs.image bs=786464 skip=1 file cramfs.image sudo mount -o loop,ro -t cramfs ./cramfs.image /mnt ls -la /mnt/bin file /mnt/bin/busybox strings /mnt/bin/busybox | grep BusyBox /usr/i386-linux-uclibc/bin/i386-uclibc-ld d /mnt/bin/busybox

    15. Re:about Linksys providing source code by elysian1 · · Score: 1

      It's not just Linksys that does this. I know of a couple other router manufacturers that for sure use Linux as the OS that make no mention of Linux or GPL. I'm sure there are quite a few more.

    16. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Patrick · · Score: 1
      Unless they modified the source for your software, they don't have to distribute it.

      Yes, they do. Section 3 of the GPL gives distributors three choices:
      1) include the source code on whatever medium you're shipping the binary.
      2) include a written offer with the binary letting people obtain the source for cost of media.
      3) include whatever written offer the distributor got from his source. This third option is only available for non-commercial distribution, so it does not apply here.

      In other words, every Linksys router should come with either all GPL source on CD, or a written offer telling me where I can obtain the GPL source from Linksys. They cannot point me at someone else's source distribution center, because Linksys is a commercial user.

      The section you quoted simply clarifies the first possibility. If you're distributing binaries from a site, you can distribute source code separately on that same site. You don't have to force every user of the binary to download both.

    17. Re:about Linksys providing source code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, dumbass... if you piss off the developer then you're not going to get new source code and your precious little routers aren't going to improve. They just want to be properly credited for their efforts. So FUCK OFF AND GROW UP!!


  12. Nice move, Microsoft by rekkanoryo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's good to see Microsoft doing something about licensing for schools, but I wonder how many people will actually know about or apply for this? Or more precisely, how useful will this really be? I can see only a limited amount of success with this program.

    1. Re:Nice move, Microsoft by k12linux · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's what I want, run Windows on a bunch of Pentium-II or older systems. Of course the MS-Office license isn't free and I still have the expense of counting the "free" licensed systems every year and reporting to MS.

      I think it is really nice of Microsoft to let me have a license for a system which ALREADY HAD A LEGAL COPY OF WINDOWS on it. Hey, at least I didn't have to buy Windows a 2nd time after the original owner paid for it.

      If you read the offer, you'll see that the school has to be reasonably sure that the system had a copy of Windows on it originally. The only thing they are doing by giving the "free license" is giving schools the ability to survive an MS audit. After all, you have to PROVE that you have licenses, not the other way around.

      This really isn't a "gift". Instead, it is MS "allowing" schools to use windows on systems which had copies of Windows purchased for them once already.

      If you can't guess from my nick, I'm much more likely to try to run Linux on these types of systems as thin clients than to slow them down even more with a copy of Windows.

    2. Re:Nice move, Microsoft by minion · · Score: 1

      Let me put Microsoft's license stimpulations into everyday common language:

      1) Buy a car
      2) Drive the car, use the car, enjoy the car
      3) Sell the car, but rip out the ignition and tell the buyer that he has no rights to use it, and must buy a new ignition, even though the car originally came with an ignition that worked fine.

      Its completely asinine. Intellectual property is no different from literature - its a work of the mind. Why then can you buy a book and resell a book, but not software written by MS?

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
  13. I know it's legal but ... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    2. You have to request the code for the specific modules you want. It is not valid to issue a request for any "code you may be using."

    Well then, what if I ask Linksys to send me any GPL code they're using ? is that valid enough ? because mething they'd have to send it to me.

    As for asking what modules I want specifically, how would I know without reverse-engineering the product ?

    I know the GPL allows users of GPLed code to require people to ask for the source code of whatever GPL stuff they're using, but when Linksys tells you you have to ask in writing, including a self-addressed stamped envolope, I call that bad will. It would show good grace if they provided a link to the sources on their site, and it would cost them less than processing snail mail.

    So Linksys, put your money where your mouth is and show you're a real proponent of Linux and OSS. Right now, you look like freeloaders who want to make the process of getting your sources as painful as possible.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:I know it's legal but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read the GPL. There is no requirement that the sources be made available except when requested and only to the one who requested it. AND the requesting party has to pay for shipping and handling. Linksys is being nice by providing the media for free.

      Linksys could in addition just send you the source on magnetic tape as per the GPL, but that wouldn't do you any good, would it, Linuxboy?

      What you think the GPL says and what is actually written are fairly divergent. Best you get to reading it if you want to know what kind of protections and rights it gives you and takes away.

    2. Re:I know it's legal but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the parent you moron, that's what he says. He's just saying there's the strictly legal way and the graceful way.

    3. Re:I know it's legal but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see any requirement in the GPL for gracefulness. In fact the entirety of the GPL is pretty onerous. What you get out of something is what you put into it, and this type of behavior is exactly the type of thing the GPL encourages by its own manipulation of words and concepts.

    4. Re:I know it's legal but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the GPL, ...These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole. If
      identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program,
      and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
      themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
      sections when you distribute them as separate works. But when you
      distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based
      on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of
      this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the
      entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it.

      Looks to me like they distribute as "part of a whole" and the GPL then applies to the entire whole, regardless of who wrote it, Linksys included. IANAL, but Linksys saying something doesn't make it true.

    5. Re:I know it's legal but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put on a flak suit and calm down.
      Asking politely never hurt.
      Right now, you sound like an @ss.

    6. Re:I know it's legal but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I suggest you read the GPL yourself. In section 3, you have three choices on what to do if you distribute GPLed code.

      a) Include the source in human readible form on a medium *customarily* used for software exchange (this would rule out magnetic tapes for virtually all platforms).

      b) Include an offer to do (a) under the provision that the cost is not more than the cost of distribution.

      c) If you're given (b), then include this information. Note, this is only valid for noncommercial ventures which receive an object or executable file.

      Linksys doesn't appear to be including the kernel sources with their router, they can't use options c since they're commercial (not to mention that they're almost certaintly compiling the source themselves), and option b would work except they *haven't* been including an offer to give out the source. Ie, Linksys has it backwards. They should include the offer with the router, and people just need to mail in possibly a letter + self addressed stamped envelope + some change for the CD/floppies. That's not what was happening, so Linksys is clearly in the wrong.

    7. Re:I know it's legal but ... by wuice · · Score: 1

      I think mailing them a request and a SASE is quite far from "painful as possible" to get the sources. Would you even look at the sources if they were available? Most people wouldn't, so to me it seems like they're well within reason not to include a source cd with every product they ship, or a section of their website devoted to it.

      Being a proponent of Linux and being a company that wants to leverage Linux's advantages are two different things.

      Though I will agree with another poster and say that they should've included somewhere (probably in the manual) some kind of information as to how to get the source for the product. Of course, once someone gets the source they can post it to a website and Linksys couldn't do a damn thing about it (not that I'd imagine they'd want to).

    8. Re:I know it's legal but ... by TheRealSlimShady · · Score: 1
      Linksys doesn't appear to be including the kernel sources with their router,

      Is this because they aren't actually distributing the kernel? They're distributing a router that happens to use Linux. It's probably a bit of hairsplitting, but the GPL does tend to encourage a bit of that...

    9. Re:I know it's legal but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux *is* the kernel. Hence the reason people want distros to refer to their systems as GNU/Linux, as GNU user level tools are normally used. Just because you can get the kernel off kernel.org doesn't mean Linksys doesn't need to follow the GPL. The GPL offers them the legal options of 3a or 3b. If they don't want to abide by that, then they can just back to generic copyright law. How much do you think all the Linux kernel contributers would each like for licensing out their part of the kernel under a different license?

    10. Re:I know it's legal but ... by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1

      I have a Tivo that happens to use Linux. TiVo provides links to a web site where I can download the source code. This makes a very good impression on me.

      It also provides me with usefull information. I can look at the build switches to see what USB-ethernet adapters are supported and which ones are not.

      Tivo did not make public their own PVR source code. I do not think they should make that public. You can mix GPL code on the same box with proprietary stuff.

      I think I will take Linksys off my own approved vendor list until they support the spirit of the GPL.

      --

      Religion is the main cause of atheism.

    11. Re:I know it's legal but ... by TheRealSlimShady · · Score: 1

      The point is that it's difficult to determine what "distribution" is. Is it merely including something that runs Linux, or is it some other set of circumstances.

    12. Re:I know it's legal but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Distribution" means to distribute. For software, this means to make copies for the use of others outside the bounds of a set group which can be rationalized to be found under law as a single entity. So, common law about family, companies, and corporation would allow copying within such without it being considered distribution. The moment where another individual outside those bounds recieves a copy of any GPLed software, that software has to include the GPL License, follow section 3a, 3b, or 3c, and a list of other requirements for GPL related to the source update history and proper markings on each file. So long as you're distributing compiled GPLed code and cannot find some exclusion under copyright law (like fair use), you're bound to either follow the extent of the GPL or follow the limitations of copyright law (something which forbids distribution). Again, Linksys violated the GPL because they included Linux plus possibly other code. It doesn't matter if they didn't do any modfications because they can't claim option 3c. Even if they could, they'd *still* need to include notice of their GPL code use, and they *didn't* do that.

    13. Re:I know it's legal but ... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Tivo does that because they MODIFIED THE KERNEL.

      Linksys DID NOT. Then run a stock Linux on their equipment, which then runs THEIR OWN STUFF.

      Hence, they have NOTHING TO DISTRIBUTE that you couldn't get off of another FTP site. Hence they have MADE NO PROVISION for it to happen on a large scale. They are COMPLYING WITH THE GPL by coughing it up anyway to anybody who asks.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    14. Re:I know it's legal but ... by leshert · · Score: 1

      You are confusing GPL with LGPL. Modification has no bearing on GPL's requirement to distribute source; it does on LPGL's.

      From the GPL:
      3. You may copy and distribute the Program (or a work based on it, under Section 2) in object code or executable form under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above provided that you also do one of the following: [...]

      4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute the Program except as expressly provided under this License.



      See? The GPL covers distributing the licensed Program, as well as a work based on the licensed Program. So I can't, for example, throw the emacs binary on a CD and sell it without providing access to the source code.

      Hence, they have NOTHING TO DISTRIBUTE that you couldn't get off of another FTP site.

      Additionally, it's not even enough to provide a download location for the binary, and tell you to go download the source from another site! They both have to be from the same place:

      [From the end of section 3, emphasis mine:]

      If distribution of executable or object code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place, then offering equivalent access to copy the source code from the same place counts as distribution of the source code, even though third parties are not compelled to copy the source along with the object code.

    15. Re:I know it's legal but ... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      See? The GPL covers distributing the licensed Program, as well as a work based on the licensed Program. So I can't, for example, throw the emacs binary on a CD and sell it without providing access to the source code.

      I stand conditionally corrected.

      Additionally, it's not even enough to provide a download location for the binary, and tell you to go download the source from another site! They both have to be from the same place:

      That's fine, other than the 'If distribution of exe. or obj. code is made by offering access to copy from a designated place' part. They're not offering it for copying, they're embedding it in a piece of hardware. So in theory, the can require you to mail in your proof of purchase, plus shipping and handling, and email you back floppys/CD/whatever.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  14. Rename it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does "Joncho" sound? How does it sound with the Spanish pronunciation?

    1. Re:Rename it! by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      In Spanish it would actually be something like "JJefe" (ugh) or "JPatron" (ugh ugh). How about "JTaco" instead =)

    2. Re:Rename it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me Jeffe, would you say that I have a plethora?

    3. Re:Rename it! by realdpk · · Score: 1

      JINJ

      JINT Is Not JBoss

  15. Ximian Desktop 2 by hendridm · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're serious, it's Ximian Desktop 2, although I find it odd that someone with such a low user id would ask in such an lame way.

    1. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Funny

      On behalf of all users with low user id's I reserve the right to be lame anytime we wish. Besides even those of us that are godlike in our geekness can't be 100% perfect. We're like Linux - only 99.99997% perfection. ;)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    2. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Stormie · · Score: 1

      I have a much lower user ID than him, and I had no fucking clue what XD2 was either.

    3. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by psaltes · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure having a low user id indicates anything - except that they probably created the account around 5 years ago. the proportion of trolls probably hasn't changed much around here since then.

      (and I had no idea what XD2 was either)

    4. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's so lame about asking that? I don't keep up on the flavor of the month desktops either.

    5. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

      I'm smelling a trend. XD2 escaped me as well. Maybe CmdrTaco could weigh in. :)

    6. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it out that someone would find it odd that a user with a low ID can't ask a question. I also find it odd that you find it lame; whats wrong with being humurous in the way he asks his question?

      Us users with lower user ID[1] have the right to be as lame as we like, when we like. We were here before you, respect your elders!

      [1]: Yeah, some of us check "Post Anonymously" too. Partly because I can, partly because I dont see what difference it makes, and paryly because it annoys some people who think it makes a difference.

    7. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by chialea · · Score: 1

      does that mean that I can be 3/4 of your lameness? this knee has really been sore lately...

      Lea

    8. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by hendridm · · Score: 1

      I said I found it odd that someone with such a low user id would ask in such an lame way. The question itself was perfectly legitimate (ie, 'What is XD2').

    9. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      It's okay. The only reason I knew was because I was looking at Ximian Evolution the other night. It has to be one of the best mail clients I've ever used.

    10. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

      Thank you for answering. The question was serious, but the phrasing was intended to net me a +5 funny. Oddly enough it did.
      Thanks for the response.

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    11. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      See, the ID number is really like age (although not in years or time spent on /.). The low ones are too "young" to have learned what XD2 is. In my case, I knew what it was but had already forgotten. :-) Maybe those around the 100000 range were in better shape.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    12. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Trick · · Score: 1

      5 digits? 5?!

      Bah... you don't have a low user ID. :)

    13. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I knoq. For the longest time I didn't bother getting an account because I though Slashdot was lame. It wasn't until 5 digits that I decided to become one with the lameness. ;)

      I figure I can count myself a low id person in general since I've been online long enough to remember when there was no web. Sure there are people who were online a lot longer than myself but few that are my age (and lived in the rural Midwest). *sigh* I miss those days where when you downloaded a file you had to manually check if there was room on the disk for it first.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    14. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Patrick · · Score: 1
      Bah... you don't have a low user ID. :)

      And neither do you, Mister Mid-Four Digits.

    15. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Trick · · Score: 1

      Damn. I knew I was asking for trouble with that.

    16. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Do you guys search out discussions on low user IDs? Cause every time it comes up we get a procession of lower and lower UIDs until someone with -4234 (and name of Blaise_Pascal) comments.

      Oh, well..... I guess I'm slightly low.

    17. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Malor · · Score: 1

      I was actually thinking about posting the exact same question, and I'm even earlier than he is.

      Either it's not as obvious as you thought, or (gasp!) low Slashdot ID is not a sign of intelligence. :-)

    18. Re:Ximian Desktop 2 by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 1

      Sadly, no. I just read that many of the comments. Just call me a Slashdot junkie.

  16. its nice of microsoft; open source scores big by polished+look+2 · · Score: 1

    This was a better, kinder move by Microsoft and I applaud them. They are behaving themselves much better in regards to licensing issues now than in the past. Since this move sounds like a defensive mesaure due to pressure put upon them by the open source alternatives, its safe to say that open source is providing the consumer and student with better licensing and hence a better product. Open source is good for the market.

    1. Re:its nice of microsoft; open source scores big by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft started seeing schools that were making successful switches to Free Software, and so now they are backing down. Essentially it is the same situation as a knife-wielding mugger backing down when his victim pulls a gun on him.

      Microsoft can posture all it wants, but second hand computers invariably had a Windows license in some part of their career. Heck, most corporate PCs actually end up purchasing the license twice. Asking schools to purchase yet another license when the computer is given away is just ridiculous.

  17. Re:bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can get over the guy's language problem, he's actually right.

  18. md5sum by molo · · Score: 1

    > md5sum --help
    Usage: md5sum [OPTION] [FILE]...
    or: md5sum [OPTION] --check [FILE]

    [...]

    -c, --check check MD5 sums against given list

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  19. "Hurd just signed a deal with Sci-Fi" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That makes sense, I always thought GNU/Hurd qualified as computer science-fiction

  20. Linksys improving, but... by renard · · Score: 4, Informative
    2. You have to request the code for the specific modules you want. It is not valid to issue a request for any "code you may be using."

    Fair is fair; however, it is Linksys who is distributing the programs in binary form to begin with. They cannot simply provide a copy of the GPL in the documentation with their product and say that this covers "all GPL code distributed with this product" without themselves identifying what software the product contains which falls under the GPL. Here, check out the TiVO website for an example of how it's done.

    -renard

    1. Re:Linksys improving, but... by Omnifarious · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Linksys should not require you to reverse-engineer their product to figure out which portions are GPL before they will comply with a request for the GPL portions of the code.

      This is clearly not acceptable.

      They need to tell you which portions are GPL so you can request them. Also, a SASE should be considered a distribution mechanism of unreasonable cost in time and effort to the person requesting the code. The Internet is ubiquitous, and practically every Linksys customer will have access to it. They should provide it for free download.

      If they're worried about everybody downloading it, they only need to require you to enter the serial number of one of their products. That would stop most random people who they didn't distribute a binary version to.

    2. Re:Linksys improving, but... by Zarquon · · Score: 1

      And further, after the module source is provided to a few people, it will likely be (legally) posted on various sites and newsgroups, and probably actually read, simply because they made it unusually difficult to get.

      Unless you had trouble with it, or were trying to add a feature/write a similar driver, would most people look at driver code? I know I haven't looked at many except V4L devices since I was working on one myself..

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    3. Re:Linksys improving, but... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      From the way I read this situation and Linksys' response, it seems they are saying that their own code is completely user-space, and the implication is that it is closed source.

      If you request a module from them, they are just going to send you what is already available online, in other words, there is no point in requesting source from them.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Linksys improving, but... by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      reverse-engineer their product

      Mounting a cramFS image is reverse-engineering these days? Have you been taking lessons from Adobe?

      Also, a SASE should be considered a distribution mechanism of unreasonable cost in time and effort to the person requesting the code.

      I seriously doubt it. Nothing in the GPL says the licensee has to provide the source in the way that is least costly, only that you use a medium customarily used for software exchange in a machine readable form. A CD through the mail is definitely is something customarily used for software exchange and is definitely machine readable.

      The GPL says you can't charge more than your cost to distribute the source. The postage to mail you the source is obviously included in the cost of distributing the source. They could charge you a couple dollars for a CD and the time it takes to burn it too, but it seems they aren't pushing it that far, and they even imply they will absorb the cost of the postage in most cases.

      They should provide it for free download.

      Why? It's just code that is already available online. As I said, the GPL doesn't dictate how you distribute the code, only that you distribute it in machine readable form on a media customarily used for software exchange.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  21. is this meant to be funny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please stop

  22. This follow-up didn't make it to this Slashback... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The NY Times article on 'Thedeacon' had it all wrong, apparently because of a personal vendetta or simply bad journalism:

    http://forums.anarchy-online.com/showthread.php? s= ff915490517fe192403f903ca23ea861&threadid=143417&p erpage=20&pagenumber=1

  23. Liability? by McCart42 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Mr. Skulason brings up an interesting point:

    There is also the question of what if some student manages to smuggle a virus out of the lab and releases it. Does the University's liability insurance cover any potential damage the virus might cause.

    I was wondering this same thing myself...I would think the University would be partly liable in a court of law, though I don't really know if it should be. They are supplying the resources the student needs to create the virus, and educating them on how to do it. Now if they can show that they took every reasonable precaution to prevent it from getting out and the student still somehow snuck it out, then they might be OK--but consider the biological parallel: it's like showing someone how to make anthrax, giving them the means to do so, and then not having a secure lab environment, thus creating a hazard to the community.


    Like I said though, it ultimately comes down to the student's will to pull the trigger, but considering that the University is supplying the gun...it's shaky ground.

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    1. Re:Liability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How hard can this be? Pull the CD rom drive and floppy drive out of every computer they have (or disable it in the bios, password protect the bios, and make sure students can't get to the motherboard to reset the bios).

      Since the lab is already supposed to be isolated network wise from the internet, how is it physically possible at that point for it to get released? If theres no physical media or electronic media for the virus to get out of the lab on, then what's the danger?

      Aside from the student going home and simply rewriting the virus, of course.. but that's a whole different issue...

    2. Re:Liability? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      the University is supplying the gun

      Formula for Nitroglycerine:
      Glycerine
      Sulfuric Acid
      Nitric Acid.

      Mix slowly and carefully. Very VERY slowly and carefully.
      And keep it ice-cold. Very VERY ice-cold.
      The nitroglycerine will be an brownish oily liquid floating on top.

      Glycerine can be obtained from your local drugstore.
      You can get sulfuric acid from a car battery, but you'll probably have to distill it to higher concentraion.
      Nitric acid is harder to find, but not unobtainable. Worst case you can make it yourself. Heck, it's a one of the main components of acid rain.

      There, now I'm evil too for supplying people a "gun".

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Liability? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      >I would think the University would be partly liable in a court of law, though I don't really know if it should be

      Actually, I would think liability would have to stem from something. Usually negligence or recklessness, I don't think they would automatically be liable just because they created viruses. Unless the act or writing viruses or transporting them is illegal then the university would be pretty well protected if they had made proper and demonstratable/documented preperations not to let the viruses run free, e.g. firewalled off lab, etc.

      Now if a student took a virus out with malicious intent I would think its fairly obvious the the only person who would be held liable in this situation would be the student.

      >University is supplying the gun...it's shaky ground.

      That would come under intent. If someone cleaned out the chemistry department to build a bomb I would think the question would be on how this happened not if chemistry departments worldwide should be shut-down for sake of security. I don't see why a computer virus would be any different.

    4. Re:Liability? by McCart42 · · Score: 1

      Well technically you educated me, but didn't provide me the means to produce the "gun", like the university is doing for these virus writers. And like I said, I don't necessarily agree with those who think the University should be held liable -- I'm just thinking about what might happen in a worst case.

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    5. Re:Liability? by saxafrog · · Score: 1

      strikes me that "every reasonable precaution" might include not teaching students how to write viruses in the first place. Ya, I know it is just code, but the _intent_ is implied in the course title...

    6. Re:Liability? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      So sue the makers of gcc, or nasm or MSVC or VBA or what ever.... those are the means to produce the gun too...

      What you are really arguing is against the knowledge to create these things. Security through obscurity, yet again.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:Liability? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Only distribution of viruses is illegal, IIRC.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:Liability? by MrFreezeBU · · Score: 1

      Ok, lets follow this logic a bit farther.....

      I enroll at the local university, take a few chem classes, then start using my new found knowledge to start large exothermic reactions at home. After blowing a few trees to toothpicks, I get bored and start looking for more/bigger targets. Next thing you know a local supermarket is now laying in ruins.

      Who is responsible for this? The college for teaching me? Nope, not a chance. This seems to be a big problem today, wanting to blame anyone but yourself for your actions. If you have the ability to write a virus, I'm willing to bet that you have the sense to decide if its a good idea to release it....

    9. Re:Liability? by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      i'm sure there's something CS students learn in their classes about networking and how things work and how to write any code that they can just put together to write viruses, especially once you get past the undergraduate level. the university is showing students how to do things. i've been in many classes where the professors and ta's would say "don't try this at home" and go and do something that could prove to be dangerous. sure i wasn't a computer science major, but i took a lot of science classes. there's a lot of bio stuff that you can learn that just doesn't go well outside of the class, same with chemistry. hell, an entire building was shutdown at my college because they found anthrax there after the anthrax thing happened after 9/11. why was the anthrax in the building? it was a pathobiology building and the kid was a grad student. RESEARCH MAYBE??? anyways, schools offer and teach lots of "tools" that could be used for bad things. flight schools for instance... sure it's a bad example, but it's true. i don't think there's a problem though. in cases where it can be used to harm others in really serious ways, licenses can get revoked (like in medicine, accounting, law, teaching, and even auto mechanics). as for teaching students how to write viruses, there's no harm until they release them.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    10. Re:Liability? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      WHat happens if a student in any university uses the knowledge they gain for computer course to create a virus?
      You don't have to go to a virus writing school to write a virus.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Liability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Look, I don't know how much clearer I can put this. I DON'T THINK THE UNIVERSITY SHOULD BE HELD LIABLE FOR THE ACTIONS OF IT'S STUDENTS. I was just saying that a court may not hold my opinion. We wouldn't be hearing so many stories about programmers who write campus search engines losing their life savings if our desires for law were perfectly aligned with the actions of the courts.


      Posting anonymously because this is a point I've already made--I just wanted to clarify.

    12. Re:Liability? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      technically you educated me

      Isn't that exactly what universities do?

      but didn't provide me the means to produce the "gun"

      I don't understand, what exactly is the university providing that I didn't? To write a virus all you need is an education and a compiler. It's quite possible the university merely told them where to get the compiler.

      As far as I know there's no law against writing a virus, and if there is than it's a horrible law. The criminal act would be using a virus to cause harm.

      what might happen in a worst case

      I agree about worst case, but worst case = an idiot judge who thinks computers are magic and that education can be a criminal act.

      [offtopic rant mode on]
      I think perhaps I'm arguing this so strongly is becasue it reminds me of the DMCA, how it makes it a crime to make "tools" and a crime to "traffic in these tools". If programs are tools then textbooks are tools and recipies are tools. And "trafficing" in these tools is nothing more than education. It is merely the passing of knowledge and information from one person to another. You can commit trafficing merely by speaking in ordinary english. ARRRRRRRRG. And any program tool can be run by a human brain merely by thinking through each step of the program. You can commit circumvention crime merely by thinking. AAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGGGG!
      [offtopic rant mode off]

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    13. Re:Liability? by Laur · · Score: 1

      That would come under intent. If someone cleaned out the chemistry department to build a bomb I would think the question would be on how this happened not if chemistry departments worldwide should be shut-down for sake of security. I don't see why a computer virus would be any different.

      I think a more accurate parallel would be if the University was teaching bomb making classes and supplying all the neccessary materials to do so. If a student created a bomb from information gained through this course (not even using any University materials) then the University may be partially liable. Even if it turns out they are not legally liable, they would probably be held liable in the minds of the public and several University jobs would soon change hands. I'm not saying whether or not I agree with teaching viruses, just giving you something to consider. Public opinion can be very powerful and the media would have a field day.

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    14. Re:Liability? by Spyder · · Score: 1

      You cultivate Anthrax, you make Sarin. There a difference between bio and chem weapons.

      IANAL, but I know a bit aout the law concerning this:
      A university would be liable for some civil charges like wrongful death, and vilations of health codes and hazardous materials. Criminal charges of neigligence and maybe manslaughter in the right circimstances (gross disriguared for human life). If the University meerly supplied the knowledge as part of the ciriculim, I doubt any charges would be filed.

      Now about virus writing, this is a little sticky. The tools are generally availible over the net, so it's not the same issue of providing access to controlled substances. There might be a neigligence charge in handling, or maybe in the ciriculim content. The issue with this is that it would come under the same percedents as full disclosure security mail lists and sites.

      While I don't agree that this is the best first step in creating a useful infromation technology security program. I do think that there is nothing illegal about it irresponsable maybe, but ethics and law are different matters.

      --
      Spyder
    15. Re:Liability? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      Is the intent to blow shit up implied in a chemistry course? Is the intent to poison people implied in a biology course? Is the intent to shoot people implied in a firearms course? Is the intent to beat the crap out of people implied in a martial arts course?

      Intent falls to the person who commits an act. I will teach you, right now, how to make a bomb. If you actually do it, I am in NO way, shape or form liable, responsible, or involved in any way.

      ALL KNOWLEDGE IS NEUTRAL. How you choose to use it is where good/evil comes in.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    16. Re:Liability? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1

      Even more interesting to consider is that the university could be teaching engineering and demolition which can be construed as the equivalent of bomb-making. Or even simple chemistry that results in an explosion. Afterall a virus is simply self-replicating/attaching code, anything can be put in its payload. Morally, its value-free, its up to the designer to decide if she wants a malicious virus or a non-malicious virus.

      A virus is a simple piece of technology, in the end its going to be intent and payload that the court will/should focus on.

  24. As much as I respect Skulason... by Arker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and even though much of what he says is correct (most virus writers, particularly nowadays, are just script-kiddies and not particularly good programmers) I can't agree with his main point. There are very valid reasons to write viruses as learning experiments. And not just for people interested in working in security either - as pure CS there is a lot to be said for it.

    He gives the impression that all viruses are harmful, but that's simply not true and he must know that. Many viruses, including all the early ones, were pure CS experiments in artificial life. They had no 'payload', no destructive nature, they just try to survive and reproduce, the basics of biological life transplanted to the digital realm.

    Now writing a virus with a destructive payload and spreading it to other people's computers - that is clearly unethical, but I really doubt that's what they have planned in this class.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    1. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Code that you did not allow onto your computer is code that you didn't allow, regardless of whether it is destructive, constructive, or benign.

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    2. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by Arker · · Score: 1

      Sure it is. Which is why spreading viruses is unethical. That doesn't mean that simply writing them is unethical.

      CS people writing viruses, running them on (their own) properly secured machines and observing them is not unethical by any sane standard.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    3. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by Traa · · Score: 1

      I think it is more like spreading viruses is illegal while writing viruses is unethical. And I don't think you have to actually write a virus just to know how they work either.

    4. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's really stupid.

      Is a building a gun unethical? What about tobacco farmers? Are they unethical?

      How about the authors of nmap? They are actually writing tools used by hackers/crackers to break into systems? Are they unethical?

      Skulason is so caught up in his own sense of self-importance he doesn't want to believe that others want to learn a different way than him. He was there from the beginning with all the DOS viruses, like the Stoned.com virus, etc, when putting a floppy disk in your drive and reading from it could infect you. I'm sure he disassembled , modified, and experimented with plenty of viruses in his day.

      The fact is, some people want to learn about virus and anti-virus technologies, and this is how they want to learn. It is perfectly valid.

      And the statement that anti-virus companies won't hire them? Who cares. They can form their own company if they want after learning for themselves how viruses work.

      And yes, you don't have to write a virus to know how they work, but you won't understand it very well.

      It's like saying you can learn everything you want to learn about TCP/IP from Richard Stevens' book, and never actually had to send a packet from your computer, or picked up a sniffer and saw the packets being exchanged. I'm sure you can rattle off all the different steps in the protocol, but you won't *really* understand it because you've never seen it with your own eyes.

      Nothing replaces first-hand knowledge.

    5. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by mshomphe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think his main point was that virus writing is a trivial task. You can always take an existing virus and tweak it to do what you want. It's low tech and crude to write a virus.

      He was basically saying that explicitly teaching how to write virii was a bad idea:
      (1) It takes no skill,
      (2) you're horribly accountable for the actions of the students in your class,
      (3) and you'd be better off teaching more in-depth responses to virii. For example, why does a certain exploit work? What's vunerable,etc.

      I have to agree with him...

      --
      She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
    6. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      and you'd be better off teaching more in-depth responses to virii. For example, why does a certain exploit work? What's vunerable,etc

      yes, a class spent re-writing Outlook would be a better lesson... now, if only MS would give its code to the Uni in a manner that isnt insulting to a Open, Enlightened Institution of Higher Learning.

    7. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "He was basically saying that explicitly teaching how to write virii was a bad idea: (1) It takes no skill,"

      I have to disagree there. Awhile back, I was working on a benign project that involved fiddling with and understanding the low-level details of DOS executables. Some of the best online sources I found were virus-writing tutorials.

    8. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by Sciamachy · · Score: 1

      He has some valid points, but tbh I reckon the virus-writing course should be a module in a much more in-depth course in writing anti-virus software, network security and the like, such that graduates of the course could leave with the best qualification in security possible. Then it'd be up to companies like F-Prot to either break their rather silly "no virus-writers" rule and employ them, or face them as competitors in business.

    9. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure it is. Which is why spreading viruses is unethical. That doesn't mean that simply writing them is unethical.

      Yea, right. Spearding them is wrong doesn't make writing them wrong, but writing them is wrong anyway. Creating something that is only designed for unethical uses is unethical, even if you don't intend to use it. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out.

    10. Re:As much as I respect Skulason... by zackbar · · Score: 1

      I disagree.

      "Further, a critical element of being able to stop these viruses is to have sufficient knowledge about them to be able to write them."

      This is not so. First of all, over two thirds of existing viruses are created by modifying existing variants. It does not take much skill to be able to modify virus source code in that way - a reasonably intelligent 10-year old kid can do that. Is that all the skill you are going to require your students to demonstrate?


      *Writing* a virus is not at all the same thing as *modifying* an existing virus.

      If the class were simply to teach people how to be script kiddies, that would be one thing. But it's about more than that.

      Frankly, my impression from his article is that either he's overreacting to the existance of a class, or he's afraid of potential competition.

  25. why not share p2p bandwidth? r/o by polished+look+2 · · Score: 1

    If 10 people have a copy of kernel-2.4.20.tar.gz then can p2p software download different parts from each person?

    1. Re:why not share p2p bandwidth? r/o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash fart knocker kernel.org has 200 Mbits of bandwidth and is mirrored world wide it doesn't need your shitty ass p2p bullshit.

      Downloading a fucking kernel off a p2p system is just a masturbation excersize for someone too uptight to just use p2p for mp3s and other copyrighted shit like 40 million other americans not to mention a big fucking security gamble.

      If you want to use p2p then take a walk on the wildside and live the crazy life of a daring scofflaw by downloading some mp3s or something and just get your fucking kernels from a proper server.

  26. JBoss: Nothing to see here -- move along by heretic · · Score: 5, Informative

    As usual, the trade rag is unnecessarily alarmist and so is the referring /. blurb. The quote of interest is:



    "I did think about them forking," Fleury said. "If they fork JBoss, that's another problem. If there's a new JBoss, if they fork it and call it JBoss I would sue them. There is only one version that we control."



    Fleury's saying he would not sue over a mere fork, per se, but instead a violation of the JBoss trademark. In other words, if CDN forked the code but called it something other than JBoss, there would be nothing to sue about.

    1. Re:JBoss: Nothing to see here -- move along by Exousia · · Score: 1

      If everyone would just fork themselves, instead of trying to fork everyone else, everything would be fine.

      --

      --Slashdot: News for Turds. Stuff that Splatters.
    2. Re:JBoss: Nothing to see here -- move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a bad idea. Hang on..tthheerree tthhaattss bbeetteerr!!

    3. Re:JBoss: Nothing to see here -- move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And soon there would be very few people left on this planet.

      Oh well, maybe that would be an improvement.

  27. Re:Red Mars... (dissenting point of view) by __david__ · · Score: 1
    This is great news. I really enjoyed the whole trilogy. Maybe a bit slow to start with, but once you get into them it's a great read.

    Interesting. I read "Red Mars" and, quite honestly, hated it. I thought the characters were extremely thin and the plot was framgented beyong belief leading to this wierd non-linear story progression where one chapter had absolutely no impact on any other chapter. I don't know, it just really bugged me. I finished it because I hate leaving books unfinished but the last 2/3 of the book just made me mad.

    I think I will be steering clear of this.

    -David
  28. MOMMY!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    are we still pissed?

    Heheh.

  29. Problems with Virus rant by Omnifarious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The current approach of reacting to the viruses is simply not working."

    While this is true, it has more to do with flaws in human nature - as long as 97.3% (according to the research of Dr. Vesselin Bontchev) of people do not react in an optimal way to a virus infection, viruses will continue to spread. I fail to see how development of more viruses will help in that regard.

    I'm pretty tired of programmers who think people should adapt to machines instead of machines to people. So, people don't react in an optimal way to a virus infection. Perhaps someone will have some new ideas about how to create software that either makes the behavior change required easier and less annoying than not changing behavior, or makes it completely unecessary. Software is for people. People aren't for software.

    Most virus writers are simply not of that caliber...forgetting the "script kiddies" and those that only modify existing viruses, the remainder write so bad code that (assuming the code shows their true abilities) they would have a hard time getting a real programming job.

    This whole section has nothing to do with the point. Sure it takes more skill to write anti-virus software, but that doesn't mean a thorough understanding of how to write a virus wouldn't be helpful. It also doesn't mean that teaching someone how to write a virus turns them into a low skill programmer.

    One could argue that all the pieces of source code lying around that are designed to reproduce themselves in their output are a form of virus, yet writing them is considered an interesting intellectual challenge worthy of a serious programmer.

    I have a few comments regarding this section. It says that "No removable media will be taken out of the laboratory." I hope that this implies an armed guard at the door, doing a full body search of the students as they depart, because anything else would be insufficient. But what about things like printouts of the virus source code? Assuming that the students are really able to create a working virus, I sincerely hope that they will not be able to take home a printout of it, only to type it back in on their home machine. I would very much like to see some assurances in this area.

    This requirement is predicated on the automatically assumed malicious intent of anybody who writes a virus. The school is trying to protect against accidents, not a deliberate attempt to unleash a virus on the net as a whole.

    Preventing source code printouts is only a very minor deterrent against such maliciousness. So I don't think think it's worth considering putting into practice as it invites circumvention by treating the people taking the class as if they were criminals. People treated as criminals from the outset are more likely to act like criminals.

    The vast majority of the anti-virus community condemns the part that involves writing viruses, considering it ethically unacceptable, pointless, and outright stupid. On all mailing lists in the anti-virus community, all real virus researchers have agreed that what you are doing is unacceptable, and simply stupid.

    You may be secure in your academic ivory tower, not caring that your course is going to help legitimize virus writing, and will only lead to more viruses being written in the future - more problems in the real world which YOU will be responsible for.

    You create a mess, and then we have to clean up after you.

    The only valid point in the entire thing.

    The rest of it is all predicated on the assumption that anybody who takes the course automatically has criminal intent. I prefer not calling people criminals until they commit a crime. Writing a virus shouldn't be a crime. Releasing one into the wild should be.

    The social consequences of making virus writing seem legitimate is a real consideration. Though, I have an unfounded suspicion that the attitude that it isn't legitimate tends to inhibit a-life research some.

    1. Re:Problems with Virus rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      actually, the last point isn't valid either.

      The vast majority of the anti-virus community condemns the part that involves writing viruses, considering it ethically unacceptable, pointless, and outright stupid. On all mailing lists in the anti-virus community, all real virus researchers have agreed that what you are doing is unacceptable, and simply stupid.

      do they really? all of them? all the real ones? and how, pray tell, does one get to be a real virus researcher, as opposed to the teeming hordes of fake ones? the above statement is equivalent to "me and all my friends think you're a poo-poo head."

      You may be secure in your academic ivory tower, not caring that your course is going to help legitimize virus writing, and will only lead to more viruses being written in the future - more problems in the real world which YOU will be responsible for.

      ad hominem, anyone?

    2. Re:Problems with Virus rant by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Yes, I guess that's true. :-)

    3. Re:Problems with Virus rant by Alan+Cox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Antivirus software ultimately is irrelevant, as is just about every other piece of "after they get in" type software. Security has to be about "they didnt get in" and more importantly "they got in but couldnt do any harm".

      Take slammer, mix with chernobyl and add disk firmware erasure. By the time something like that hits you its too late to update your virus scanner.

  30. The "bug" in the Installer for XD2 by M1000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the readme if you're wondering about it before downloading that 473 MB file ;-)

    btw, I love bittorrent... downloading at 250-400 k/s !

    --

    Note!

    To Install Ximian Desktop 2 for RedHat 9 (x86), please do the following:

    1) Burn the ISO to a CD.
    2) Mount the CD, and run installer-i386. make sure you have network
    connectivity. The installer will need a file from ximian.com, but it's only
    300k.
    3) Select "Local Media" and point it at where you mounted the cd (usually /mnt/cdrom for RedHat)

    4) THIS IS IMPORTANT!
    You'll get to a point where you verify what packages the installer will
    install. LOOK AT THE VERSIONS of the packages that will be installed.
    Note all the packages that do NOT have 'ximian' in the version number.
    These need to be installed from RedHat 9 media BEFORE continuing.

    If you see any packages that lack 'ximian' in its version, QUIT THE INSTALLER,
    install the missing packages, and rerun the installer.

    5) After noting 4, and installing the "missing" packages, rerun the installer.
    In a few minutes, you'll be able to enjoy your new XD2 install!

  31. Defectors or defectives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But they [the defectors] were not involved in the business and they were disgruntled. They also were not the sharpest ones" in the bunch, he added. /me --- In further news, Fleury was subsequently browbeaten by his HR manager and the corporate lawyer...

    Probably not a judicious comment unless he is looking to get himself sued....

  32. Re:bit torrent by Arker · · Score: 1

    No he isn't.

    Granted, if someone has a file up on a public server with plenty of bandwidth, there's no need.

    But bandwidth isn't free, and not everyone can afford to pay for the privilege of giving away their code.

    With P2P everyone interested in the file can contribute a little of their bandwidth to aggregate, and make fast distribution possible without shelling out for a fast server on a big pipe. So why not use it?

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  33. Amiga: The OTHER Gay Computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amiga: The OTHER Gay Computer

  34. Re:bit torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So why not use it?

    Umm, because it fucking sucks?

  35. Why are you so... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    angry? Therapy, perhaps, maybe a Zoloft tab or two?

  36. Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Adam+J.+Richter · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. You have to request the code for the specific modules you want. It is not valid to issue a request for any "code you may be using."

    Section 3 of version 2 of the GNU General Public License provides three options for those wishing to distribute GPL'ed software: (a) "Accompany it with the complete corresponding machine-readable source code [...]" (as I understand it, Linksys did not do this), (b) "Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three years, to give any third party , for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code [...]", or, (c) an option available "allowed only for noncommercial distribution" (not the case of Linksys). So, I infer that Linksys is now trying to get close to following option (b).

    The problem that I see with Linksys's claim that "It is not valid to issue a request for any 'code you may be using.'" is that without written offers that specifically identify exactly what GPL'ed software Linksys is using, and without source code to begin with, we cannot be sure that we know all of the source code that Linksys is using. For example, we don't know everything that was linked into their busybox image, and we might not even know every kernel device driver they use.

    It seems that Linksys sees two different specificity requirements in the GPL. Firstly, they seem to think that a blanket offer to provide code without identifying the source code that they are referring to satisifies the written offer requirements of section 3b. Secondly, they seem to think that they are not obliged to fulfill the acceptance of that offer when it is made with the same level of specificity. Linksys seems to think that they are fulfilling the GPL's requirements if they provide an offer to do x, but refuse to actually do it if someone simply says, "okay, I accept your offer." In other words, Linksys is not providing enough information in their offer for people to fully avail themselves of it. This is similar to offering to provide source code, but providing no contact information by which people can accept the offer. I expect that under some sort of "reasonable man" standard, a court would decide that these shenanigans are not in the intended meaning of the GPL.

    If I were in Linksys's shoes, I'd just dump of all of the GPL'ed source code involved into a CD image, send out CD's as needed, and also put it on an FTP site, which would probably reduce the requests for physical media to about a dozen (and, besides, the media costs less than postage and it's useful to have a mailing list of likely Linux wireless access point developers).

    Personally, I am mostly interested in the 802.11g drivers, although I suspect that some useful software may have been linked into busybox, which might be helpful to have too. I am glad that Linksys is trying to conform to the requirements of the GNU General Public License. Hopefully we can help them actually achieve that.

    By the way, I just sent info@linksys.com a request for the source code to the kernel and any software linked against BusyBox. I sure wish I knew what other GPL'ed software is in the WRT54G.

    1. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could one not take this latest offer of source upon request as fulfilling section B?

      "You can have any GPL code you request, but you must name the module you want."

      It complies with the letter of the license.

    2. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Adam+J.+Richter · · Score: 1
      "You can have any GPL code you request, but you must name the module you want."

      The point of my posting was that I think that "but you must name the module you want" is unreasonable if they won't tell you what all of those modules are, and that I think a court would agree under something like the Four Corners Rule, even if it "complies with the letter of the license." In other words, I think it's legally implicit that people must be given enough information in the offer to take advantage of it.

      If Linksys were to list the modules that I could just copy into my request, then I think such a restriction problably would not unduly inhibit one from taking advantage of their offer.

      Note that I am not a lawyer, so please do not rely on this or my original message as legal advice.

    3. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really no different than the FOIA which purports to give you access to any information that the govenment has (declassified, I believe). But you must specify as clearly and exactly as possible what you want or they will just shrug and say tough luck.

    4. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may be right, but it could be that they'd be perfectly happy with a request like "please send me all GPL software that's used in my Linksys Wireless 4-port Cable/DSL Router". That ought to be perfectly specific enough and that may have been all they wanted. That's very different than "send me all GPL software that you've ever shipped a product with", which is what they might have been trying to avoid.

    5. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a court would decide that these shenanigans are not in the intended meaning of the GPL

      No damages, pointless case.

    6. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Adam+J.+Richter · · Score: 1
      You may be right, but it could be that they'd be perfectly happy with a request like "please send me all GPL software that's used in my Linksys Wireless 4-port Cable/DSL Router."

      Sorry if I was unclear. I too would be perfectly happy with that.

      Likewise, I also think it would also be fine if they required that I tell them which 4-port Cable/DSL Router model I was referring to.

    7. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask for the kernel proper, plus this stuff...

      $ file `find . -type f` | grep ELF
      ./bin/busybox
      ./lib/libc.so.6
      ./lib/ld.so.1
      ./lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/diag/diag .o
      ./lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/et/et.o
      ./lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/il/il.o
      ./lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/mac/writema c.o
      ./lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/wl/wl. o
      ./lib/libdl.so.2
      ./lib/libm.so.6
      ./lib/libcry pt.so.1
      ./lib/libnsl.so.1
      ./sbin/rc
      ./sbin/nas
      ./usr/lib/libnvram.so
      ./usr/lib/libnetconf.so
      . /usr/lib/iptables/libipt_DNAT.so
      ./usr/lib/iptabl es/libipt_icmp.so
      ./usr/lib/iptables/libipt_iplim it.so
      ./usr/lib/iptables/libipt_LOG.so
      ./usr/lib /iptables/libipt_mac.so
      ./usr/lib/iptables/libipt _mark.so
      ./usr/lib/iptables/libipt_MARK.so
      ./usr /lib/iptables/libipt_MASQUERADE.so
      ./usr/lib/ipta bles/libipt_standard.so
      ./usr/lib/iptables/libipt _state.so
      ./usr/lib/iptables/libipt_TCPMSS.so
      ./ usr/lib/iptables/libipt_tcp.so
      ./usr/lib/iptables /libipt_TTL.so
      ./usr/lib/iptables/libipt_udp.so
      ./usr/sbin/dumpleases
    8. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look at
      http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-violation.html

      this seems to imply that the distributer needs to identify what is GPL'd.

    9. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      try again:

      btw, there are more licenses in here than the GPL, and what they are doing won't get them out of one of them.


      /bin/busybox
      /lib/libm.so.6
      /lib/ld.so.1
      /lib/libnsl.so.1
      /lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/et/et.o
      /lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/il/il.o
      /lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/wl/wl.o
      /lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/mac/writemac .o
      /lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/net/diag/diag.o
      /lib/libcrypt.so.1
      /lib/libdl.so.2
      /lib/libc.so.6
      /usr/lib/libnetconf.so
      /usr/lib/iptables/libipt_state.so
      /usr/lib/iptabl es/libipt_DNAT.so
      /usr/lib/iptables/libipt_LOG.so
      /usr/lib/iptables /libipt_iplimit.so
      /usr/lib/iptables/libipt_MARK.so
      /usr/lib/iptable s/libipt_TTL.so
      /usr/lib/iptables/libipt_mark.so
      /usr/lib/iptable s/libipt_mac.so
      /usr/lib/iptables/libipt_MASQUERADE.so
      /usr/lib/i ptables/libipt_tcp.so
      /usr/lib/iptables/libipt_udp.so
      /usr/lib/iptables /libipt_icmp.so
      /usr/lib/iptables/libipt_standard.so
      /usr/lib/ipt ables/libipt_TCPMSS.so
      /usr/lib/libnvram.so
      /usr/sbin/wl
      /usr/sbin/cron
      /usr/sbin/pppd
      /usr/sbin/pptp
      /usr/sbin/ripd
      /usr/sbin/upnp
      /u sr/sbin/dumpleases
      /usr/sbin/brctl
      /usr/sbin/httpd
      /usr/sbin/nvram
      /usr/sbin/tftpd
      /usr/sbin/zebra
      /usr/sbin/iptables-restore
      /usr/sbin/iptables
      /usr/sbin/ipupdate
      /usr/sbin/netconf
      /usr/sbin/mDNSResponderPosix
      /usr/sbin/udhcpd
      /usr/sbin/epi_ttcp
      /usr/sbin/ntpclient
      /usr/sbin/pppoecd
      /sbin/rc
      /sbin/nas

      lame filter... Please try to keep posts on topic. Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.

      Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account. Hot-swap designs were once reserved for medical-support systems, telcomm, or other "high-reliability" installations. now everybody wants to swap with the lights on. It wasn't long ago that hot-swap capabilities were limited to systems demanding the greatest reliability and uptime. Now users expect equipment to tolerate connecting or replacing modules or peripherals without power cycling the host system. Hot-swappable designs, however, are not a homogeneous category. They involve power-management products as well as signal-handling ICs and have architectural implications at the component, bus, and system levels. You needn't be an IC designer to design hot-swap tolerant circuits, but familiarity with the I/O structure of candidate logic families goes a long way toward ensuring that your product's hot-swap robustness is a matter of design, not happenstance. A generalized depiction of a CMOS-logic IC includes clamp diodes between I/O pins and the supply rails and is representative of devices from many logic families fabricated on common IC processes (Figure 1 and Reference 1 ). Diodes D1 and D2 provide overshoot and undershoot protection, respectively. They also enhance the chip's ESD robustness at the inputs, protecting the relatively fragile thin-oxide regions that form the MOS devices' gates. IC designers may include explicit output-clamp devices in the chip layout, but the outputs may include parasitic diodes as well.

    10. Re:Concerns Linksys's GPL claims by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to ask for the scripts used to control compilation and installation of the executable.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  37. Re:Red Mars... (dissenting point of view) by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    A lot of things clear up and are built upon in the next two books. The beginning of "Red" kind of blew, but it does get better.

    I just bought "Years of Rice and Salt" to read camping next week. It is an alternate history by Robinson about the Black Death killing 99% of Europe, instead of 1/3, and the Muslim, Asian and Native Americans ruling the world.

  38. Code requesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have to request the code for the specific modules you want. It is not valid to issue a request for any "code you may be using.
    Is this actually allowed in the GPL? Others here have pointed out that it is more or less impossible to know what sections to request when you only have a binary. But my impression was that a request for any GPLed code was acceptable, in which case Linksys would still be in the wrong. Am I incorrect in thinking that?

  39. Power off buttons by Skater · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "In any mode, hold down the stop button (a little square under the play button) for 2-3 seconds to turn off the unit."

    The CD stereo (an aftermarket Blaupunkt) in my car does something like this: to turn it off, you have to press and hold the power button for three seconds. Otherwise, it just reduces the volume significantly but continues to play. I've seen other brands do this, too.

    WHY?

    When I hit the power button, I want the radio to turn OFF. Right at that moment. If I'm turning off the radio, there's a good chance that I'm doing so because it's distracting me and I need to concentrate on the traffic and roads around me. Now, I'm forced to keep my hand at the radio (making it useless for steering or operating other controls, and it restricts my ability to look over my shoulders to check traffic in the blind spots) for several seconds. It's annoying.

    When I look at new radios, that's the first thing I check: the power button must work instantly. (I didn't pick this radio myself--it was installed by the dealer when I purchased the car.)

    If the manufacturers want to include a "mute" feature, fine, just add another button for it. Or better yet, use a volume knob; my other car has one and it works perfectly.

    --RJ

    1. Re:Power off buttons by shepd · · Score: 1

      Why not just remove the faceplate?

      That turns off my stereo mighty fast (an older Pioneer), and it has an "eject" button for that putpose too.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Power off buttons by AvitarX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Buttons suck on car stereos.

      I cannot find any aftermarket equipment that has a nob for the tuner, a nob for volume, a nob for the fader, and a nob for the balance and an equilizer that has levers.

      Why should I need to push about 8 things to decrease the trebble so I can here less static in the traffic report?

      And why can't I just spin a nob to get the sound behind me (Some times I can't deal with it infron of me as I drive).

      Because of this I slump along with my crappy factory supplied radio and an RF modulation changer.

      Also why do they make AM and FM bands have differnt presets? I could use like 5 presets spread between the bands and not need to wory about FM1 FM2 FM3 AM1 AM2 I only listen to 5 stations why should I need to worry about what band I am set to at all?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Power off buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stuff about knobs
      stuff about an RF modulation changer

      Sounds like you need a 1st Generation iPod.

    4. Re:Power off buttons by Skater · · Score: 1

      So, in addition to worrying about the traffic, you want me to juggle a faceplate? :)

      --RJ

    5. Re:Power off buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHY?

      You already know the answer to this question, but you fear it. You fear the madness that this knowledge may bring. Read no further, those who fear the knowledge.

      It is because management decided it will be that way.

      Dispite the fact that the product design team told them it was a bad idea, dispite the fact that the engineers told them it was a bad idea, dispite the fact that everyone in the focus groups complained about it, a manager somewhere though it would be "cool" if it did that. So it is done.

      Do not meddle in the affairs of managers, for they are stupid and quick to anger.

    6. Re:Power off buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Also why do they make AM and FM bands have differnt presets? I could use like 5 presets spread between the bands and not need to wory about FM1 FM2 FM3 AM1 AM2 I only listen to 5 stations why should I need to worry about what band I am set to at all?"

      Because some people like to listen to 5 stations for each band.

    7. Re:Power off buttons by pod · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but why should it matter what band you're on? If you need that many, there should be 'banks', so you don't run out of buttons. What if you want 19 FM stations and 1 AM station on your presets? YOu're kinda fucked then, even though the radio has enough memory to store 20 station presets.

      They should be like bookmarks. Do I need to be in http://slashdot.org/ before I can see and use my /. bookmarks? That would be retarded. Technology is supposed to help people, not make them remember and fugure out a bunch of stuff to tune into a station while driving a 2 ton killing machine.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    8. Re:Power off buttons by argel · · Score: 1

      Also why do they make AM and FM bands have differnt presets? I could use like 5 presets spread between the bands and not need to wory about FM1 FM2 FM3 AM1 AM2 I only listen to 5 stations why should I need to worry about what band I am set to at all? I always thought it came down to His and Hers....

      --

      -- Argel
  40. RTFA by carlcmc · · Score: 1

    He said they COULD require a request be submitted via mail and povide self addressed envelope and costs, but they choose not to and will honor requests on a case by case basis.

  41. Linguistic hypocrisy by mblase · · Score: 1

    This is listed in the manual, which you are right, is a very poorly done Korean effort. ...which leads me to wonder if Americans have some kind of patent on bad English grammar.

    1. Re:Linguistic hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hypocrisy - couldn't agree more. But, if we pursue your reasoning to it's logical conclusion, we have to blame the Royal family for the worst literary offences. i.e through, cough, plough, dough, hiccough, etc. Here, the intention isn't consistency or communication, it's snobbery.

      I thought English was an open source language. When the "official" vocabulary and grammar doesn't express a concept, we create patches. Since British culture doesn't contain all concepts, new words have to be added. I guess that's why there's American, Australian, Canadian, African, Indian, Philippino, Chinese, and even other dialects.

      Sorry that these long standing patches haven't met with your personal approval. But wait, you're not the queen, you must be the SCO!

  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. Linksys code capers... by deleted_soul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somebody help me out here..

    If they aren't statically or dynamically linking to the code. Then exactly how are they linking to it? Magically? The had to compile the code to work with linux base right?

    What bits did they leave in the open? Unless you disassemble their bio's there is no way to tell wether their code was in binary before it was compiled. Its really not in their best interest to just say 'See look, this is how I did it', even though they accepted the terms of the GPL in good faith. Maybe tomorrow we will find out how well the GPL will hold up.

    I do believe that any company that accepts the GPL should not be allowed to turn and run the instant they drop their side of the bargain.

    Maybe there should have been a GPL gurantee that starts the moment they sell a product based on linux sources. At least for commercial companies, so they can't say they didn't understand the GPL.

    --
    this sig is classified..how about yours?
    1. Re:Linksys code capers... by jgoemat · · Score: 1

      I think what they are trying to say is that they are running some version of the Linux OS, which is running applications that they 100% wrote themselves. I don't believe linking with the standard C (not C++) library and making operating system calls is prohibited by the GPL.

    2. Re:Linksys code capers... by julesh · · Score: 1

      If they aren't statically or dynamically linking to the code. Then exactly how are they linking to it? Magically?

      Maybe they're not linking to it, but just using services provided by it, eg the system call interface, which doesn't use linking at all, but instead uses a platform-dependendant method that generally requires no linkage to occur. Such methods include raising a software interrupt or using a special system call instruction, depending on the processor in use.

    3. Re:Linksys code capers... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Informative

      They took linux, compiled it, and are running it on their boxes. They then wrote a program which runs, under Linux, on those boxes.

      End of story. They have modified NOTHING which is under the GPL, so they don't have to release their own stuff. They are NOT required to post the parts of Linux they're using on their website, they're required to give it to whoever a) owns their product and b) specifically asks for it. They're also allowed to charge the cost of giving it to the person; hence the self-addressed stamped envelope.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  44. Be gentle? by Sabbath.sCm · · Score: 1

    The more people downloading from a BitTorrent link, the better...

    1. Re:Be gentle? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Like with the Gullom Award?

      I am confused now.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Be gentle? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1

      Not if you slashdot the tracker or the .torrent file host

  45. Two can play at that game... by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Funny

    Send them a polite e-mail requesting every piece of GPL software you can think of. And please post it and the response on /.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:Two can play at that game... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that can be done in a nice script... read all the programs in de debian tree + all the programms in fresmeat.

      Then send 1 email for every program :)

  46. JBoss is a trademark issue, not a code fork issue. by AJWM · · Score: 1

    This is getting way overblown due to some bad reporting or some bad reading of the reports.

    The issue is not whether the guys that walked can fork the JBoss code -- it's [L]GPL, of course they can -- it's whether they can call the result JBoss.

    Assuming JBoss is a trademark (which I believe it is), then they can't, at least not without Fleury's permission. They can call it JPointyHeaded, or JDictator, or JSlavedriver, or even Fred, but not somebody else's trademark.

    --
    -- Alastair
  47. obligatory rude pun by Artifex · · Score: 3, Funny

    So does this mean that, if they want to use the JBoss name for their independent work, Mark Fleury says to "fork off and die?"

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:obligatory rude pun by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Interesting that the developers are saying "stick a fork in it, it's not done."

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  48. My Alpine is similiar by Trillan · · Score: 1

    To turn it off, I need to press and hold down the Source (Tuner/CD) button for about a second. Any button will turn it back on.

    To be honest, it doesn't bother me much, and I never turn it off by mistake. I'm not sure that Off really has any meaning for a car stereo; it's on when the ignition is on, and off any other time, and as long as I can get it to shut up with a single button press (Mute/Pause) I don't really care what it's labelled as.

  49. Mars Will Never Be Terraformed by Saeger · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Red Mars is ... an 'almost plausible sci-fi' future-history approach about Colonizing and Terraforming Mars.

    It's only plausible if you still think that technology is advancing linearly, instead of exponentially, and only if you assume humans will still be stuck in our fragile biological form for a period longer than the centuries it takes to terraform a planet in the first place. So no, IMHO, I think we'll sooner end up ripping Mars apart (oh the humanity!) to make better use of its matter, than wasting space & energy by living on its limited surface area.

    (Yeah, I've had a slight problem suspending my disbelief for most SF in recent years :)

    I'd much rather see Iain Banks' Culture brought to the screen, though that would be just a tad bit more difficult.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Mars Will Never Be Terraformed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dont have a problem suspending disbelief as much as you have problem believing that the future can only unfold the way *you* think it will, and frankly thats very narrowminded.

    2. Re:Mars Will Never Be Terraformed by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 1

      The Culture would never terraform Mars. It would also never tear it apart. The Culture prefers appreciate planets as they are, that's why they live on less mass-wasteful and custom-made constructs like plates, orbitals, and GSVs.

    3. Re:Mars Will Never Be Terraformed by slashd'oh · · Score: 1
      With all the recent postings about SCO, am I the only one who sees the Caldera topic-logo as a red planet with a blue continent shaped like Mickey Mouse? Looks like the logo of Disney's Mars Adventure or something. (Luna Park, anyone?)

      Good book, by the way.

    4. Re:Mars Will Never Be Terraformed by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Over my dead body will you rip Mars apart. Go get your mass somewhere else. (There are a lot of asteroids that wouldn't be missed.)

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  50. Torrent slow by fatwreckfan · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or is the torrent EXTREMELY slow? I tried it and it didn't download at all for a while, went to 1kbps immediately...I'm just going to download the RPMs from a mirror with wget and throw them on CD.

    1. Re:Torrent slow by Doc_Linux · · Score: 1

      It's you, I'm currently downloading at 304.3KB/s & uploading at 54.2KB/s ;-)

      --
      http://www.doc-linux.co.uk
    2. Re:Torrent slow by fatwreckfan · · Score: 1

      Damnit...I think my firewall is fucking me over. Oh well, I'm downloading from a mirror at 150kbps which is a decent speed for me. Thanks for the info though :)

  51. Debian Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Software in the Public Interest has yet to respond with a lower licensing fee for Debian."

    Priceless!

    (As it were.)

    --AC

  52. Fresh ReStart by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 1

    Patrick Cable II writes "I got an interesting letter from Microsoft today at work. Microsoft has started a "Fresh Start" program for educational instutions that basically makes it so schools who have had computers donated to them without licenses or media can get media and a letter stating the computer is licensed to use a Windows operating system

    Now, if someone would be interested in taking all the PCs in a school district, and then donate them back to the district. That would be just peachy, it being so expensive to upgrade from Windows 95 and all. Thanks.
  53. Microsoft & Schools by m00nun1t · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, let me see if I've got this:

    If Microsoft sell at full price to schools, they are scum
    If they "back license" schools (as they are doing) they are competing with linux
    If they give software free to schools they are trying to screw Apple.

    Not giving them much wriggle room are you? What are they SUPPOSED to be doing?

    1. Re:Microsoft & Schools by WereTiger · · Score: 1

      I think you're running into the Slashdot zealotry.

      They're real closed minded about anything that doesn't involve 'open source' or 'freedom'.

      Kinda pathetic, isn't it? These are the same freaks that will utter "Microsoft is such a monopoly" and "Linux is a viable alternative for the desktop" in the same breath. Sheesh.

      --
      If you're hearing rhetoric about Linux, open source, or Mac and everyone's bashing Microsoft, you've found Slashdot.
    2. Re:Microsoft & Schools by laird · · Score: 1

      The problem wasn't in MS selling software at full price, it was in MS telling schools that if they had donated PC's with Windows on them, but no manual or certificate, that they should _throw the computers out_ because using the donated PC's would be illegal, and MS doesn't sell a version of Windows that can run on older machines that are typically donated (you can't buy Win98 or NT any more...).

      Back licensing the school is actually pretty decent of MS, because they eliminate any risk of future hassles.

      The amusing part, to me anyway, is that MS completely reversed itself on the topic, presumably because schools realized that if MS wouldn't let them run Windows, rather than throwing the PC's out they could install Linux, and MS realized that they'd rather have schools run free, obsolete versions of Windows than Linux.

    3. Re:Microsoft & Schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you include yourself in that gigantic lump of "Slashdot Users" gestalt entity you've just created? No? Then don't be such a fucking moron, please.

  54. DAMN STRAIGHT by Dogun · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more with you. It's both within your rights and something that more people should be doing. And regardless what the AC just before me said, busybox doesn't suck.

    It takes so little effort for them to comply with the GPL that they should be doing it anyhow, but maybe companies need a little incentive to start complying. How long does it take to put up a webpage linking to source for busybox v. whatever, stock kernel x, or whatever? Practically none. Think about all the time and money they saved by using the GPL'd stuff in the first place? TONS.

    And personally, I seriously doubt a notice that "hey, we use some GPL'd software in here, these are their names, they may be stock packages, but for licensing reasons we are providing the source at http://www.companyx.com/products/rotofruitskinner/ GPL/" is going to act as an impediment to people buying the product. If anything, I'd be more convinced of its reliability; I've had enough devices running unstable software to make me a selective purchaser.

    Poor show linksys. Keep it up BB maintainer!

  55. Ummm,.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not giving them much wriggle room are you? What are they SUPPOSED to be doing? ...keeping their stuff outta the schools?

  56. YOU FAIL IT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JINT Is Not JBoss
    ^

    1. Re:YOU FAIL IT! by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Fuck, you're right. I drank 5 beers tonight, but none before that post. I DO FAIL IT. and I accept it.

      BRING ON THE WRATH.

  57. scientific bloopers by Keith+McClary · · Score: 1

    What bugged was the part where they were setting up windmill powered electric heaters to warm up Mars.
    This is a double scientific blooper:
    1) Wind energy gets degraded into heat naturally without the help of windmills.
    2)Even if you used an external heat source such as nuclear energy the warmth would not accumulate, basically for the same reason that your stove does not get hotter every time you cook. The temperature of a planet is determined by an equilibrium between solar heating (plus other relatively small sources) and radiation into space.

    1. Re:scientific bloopers by Jhan · · Score: 1

      What bugged was the part where they were setting up windmill powered electric heaters to warm up Mars.

      Actually, there was a lot of sceptisism from the scientists about that little experiment in the book. It turned out that the reason Saxifrage Russell pushed that project so hard was that he had (unethically, without consent) hidden GM lichen inside the heaters, remember?

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  58. Re:This follow-up didn't make it to this Slashback by yomegaman · · Score: 1

    LOL, that thread makes Thedeacon and all other AO players look even more like unstable losers than the original article did!

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  59. GPL - getting the code by abe+ferlman · · Score: 1

    I agree with you that Linksys should tell people what GPL'd code they're using. Publishing programs made with GPL source requires publishing an offer for the source or the source itself.

    However, I disagree with you about an SASE being too onerous. The reason is that only one person really has to do it, then we can all leech off her server all night long. Or she can set up a bittorrent stream, or what have you.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  60. Here's an idea... by kcb93x · · Score: 1

    Maybe 'purchase' them from the district for say, $50. Then, 'donate' them back. (Don't even move them- just do the paperwork) Wala! Free 98SE Licenses.

    Now...I just need to get more than 16 or 24 MBs of ram in those 486s....

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  61. Damages possible, but not the point by Adam+J.+Richter · · Score: 1
    I think a case can be made for damages based on what would have happened in the meantime if the source code had been properly made available.

    Also, from a copyright standpoint, if Linksys was in violation of the GPL, then they were infringing many parties' copyrights by distributing the GPL'ed software. Those who registered the copyrights could sue for at least statutory damages, between $750 and $25k per copy, as I understand it (and, again, I'm not a lawyer, so don't rely on this as legal advice).

    More importantly, I believe a civil court can do more than just award money. I would expect the court would order Linksys to provide the complete source code without requiring people to identify specific modules (or Linksys would have to pay contempt of court fines and so on). This might result in publication of some new free software, such as 802.11g drivers (even if they turned out to be a user level program linked into BusyBox). These benefits are not "pointless" to the users who are already asking for such software.

    As a practical matter, I think Linksys was simply trying to move quickly in assembling their first pass at GPL compliance. I suspect that they'll soon offer complete source without making people jump through hoops. I haven't heard of Linksys being obnoxious to the developer community before. If anything, I think they've been rather pro-nerd, providing detachable antennas, using the documented Intersil 802.11b chips. I think they realize that it's in their enlightened self-interest if Linux users and other developers can make more use of their product, because those users are more likely to buy the products or even specify them in larger purchases.

  62. TiVo for Radio? by JRHelgeson · · Score: 2, Funny

    My TiVo box, a loyal pal,
    A friend I Truly care for.
    Because It guarantees I'll see,
    The shows I wasn't there for.
    Two thousand shows I've "taped" so far,
    Each Night I "tape" a new one.
    Who knows, perhaps there'll come a day,
    I'll find the time to view one.

    Now I have an opportunity to get behind on all that radio talk show stuff that was previously unimportant.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  63. Re:This follow-up didn't make it to this Slashback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    even better here is a link to one of his slashdot comments in that story. In that thread he flips out on the new york times guy and later explains how the language used wasn't complimentary. WTF? Anyway the slashdot post is even better it just screams insults all in one huge paragraph wort checking out O.o

  64. how about by Erris · · Score: 1
    I understand the Fleury's organization has trademarked "JBoss".

    Do they own "JrBoss"? Drat, someone does.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  65. quality by krokodil · · Score: 1

    After plain dumb journalism like this story on JBoss I wonder if I should trust other stories published here. The meaning of the statement is completely changed. It takes 20 sec to read the original quote (not even the whole story)!

  66. Ethical? by Nurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it is more like spreading viruses is illegal while writing viruses is unethical. And I don't think you have to actually write a virus just to know how they work either.

    Hm. I just can't see that. I have written more than one virus in my time. Nobody got hurt. I played with them on isolated machines. I learnt something from doing it. It was a challenge and it was lots of fun. For example, I set myself the challenge of writing a virus that infected DOS .bat files and that was written in DOS batch language. I succeeded. That was almost as much fun as doing the boot sector stuff.

    It turned out useful some time later when I had a non-bootable harddisk and only an assembler on a bootable floppy (a magazine cover disk :-) ) with which to fix it.

    And at the end of all this, nothing got damaged. No people got hurt. I had fun watching my code wander around my systems. I played in assembler, and eventually deleted the viruses and moved on to other things, like artificial life simulations and genetic algorithms. 14 years later, I still have people oohing and ahing over the leet assembler skills I use on their embedded projects.

    How was this unethical?

    --
    ---
  67. hah (mod parent up) by Artifex · · Score: 1
    Interesting that the developers are saying "stick a fork in it, it's not done."


    Especially, on a more serious note, given the speculation in other comments that this breakaway crew might be trying to make this "tine" of the fork more in line with J2EE.

    I really can't say any more about this, however. I don't really know anything about this rift thing with Sun, I just wanted to be funny :)

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  68. I say hooray for the USPS by themightythor · · Score: 1

    So, you're saying that Sun magically transported the postcard from the post box to their employee? Or do you think that it's more plausible that the USPS did a fair amount of work to get it there and then Sun either did a finger on the email address or send a message to said address to find out who to send it to through interoffice mail?

    1. Re:I say hooray for the USPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      usps gave it to the nearest sun plant in the specified city and sun's interoffice mail did the rest. what is so hard to understand about that?

  69. The mail by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The USPS truely isn't that bad..
    Actually, the current USPS does a very good job, all things considered. They have every right to resent the term "snail mail", though they're probably stuck with it.

    But it hasn't always been this way. Horror stories about lost mail and general screwups were legion. UPS wouldn't even be in business if the Parcel Post hadn't been a complete disaster for years and years.

    I'm old enough to remember when the USPS was the federal Post Office Department and the Postmaster-General was appointed by the President. The job always went to the chairman of the party in power, because of all the patronage jobs. Needless to say, efficiency and quality of service were not top priorities. Most of the USPS's unfortunate reputation dates from this period.

    1. Re:The mail by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I almost never send 'snail mail' anymore but I do send increasingly more packages. I'd like to see the USPS put more energy into improving that role but they do a pretty good job now.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  70. Re:Need help choosing a new computer by KingArthur10 · · Score: 1

    I agree whole-heartedly with this statement. Anyone who purposely posts an off-topic statement with derrogitory intent should not be alowed to use a computer, let alone post on a web-board dedicated to computers. And the fact that you are not willing to post using your screen name shows that you are not man enough to stand up for what you believe in. If you wish to post something like this in the future, at least have the decency to submit your name with it and own up to what you say.

    --
    I came, I saw, She conquered.
  71. Don't even go there! by Fefe · · Score: 1

    Don't they normally embrace and extend?

    No, I do not want to know what those pervs will extend to the kids!

  72. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    make sure you read the readme first as there is a bug in the installer you need to know about.

    Linux, ready for the desktop. Why doesn't Ximian actually FIX the bugs in the INSTALLER when they're found? Or do I have to get it all from CVS or something for that.

  73. Re:Need help choosing a new computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I think the choice is clear. Windows is the operating system for you. Let me explain. The creator of Windows (Microsoft) has been fucking the industry in the ass for years. As a result of such behavior, many think that the company is beginning to die. In addition, since the Windows code base is so poorly written, the platform has been compromised and is rendered weak by constant virus attacks. As an HIV sufferer, I'm sure you'll be able to more easily relate to your computer because of this.

    So there you have it. Go out any purchase a copy of Windows XP (Extreme Patsie) today. Hurry before you're too sick to install all of the Windows Update patches!

  74. Re:Need help choosing a new computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I agree. However I would prefer it if anybody who refers to a SlashDot username as a "screen name" had their testicals removed with a pen knife and some dental floss. I am also interested at your basging of Anonymous Cowards, as though your real name is "KingArthur10" and we could all look you up in the 'phone book.

  75. ESR Rating? by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    I would say the guy is out of his mind, has no business sense, is unreasonable, or has an ego the size of Bill Gates Estate.

    Let me tell you, that is one big ego.


    A few days ago during the Jargon File discussion, someone proposed the ESR as the basic unit of ego. Much like the Farad, 1 ESR is a finite but impossibly huge number. I just wonder what the conversion factor is between a "Bill Gates Estate" sized ego and the ESR is. I'd guess about a 0.3 myself.

    1. Re:ESR Rating? by Tower · · Score: 1

      A farad isn't impossibly huge by any stretch (and neither is a Henry), though pico-, micro-, and milli- are far more common on Farads and Henrys than kilo- and mega- (but doesn't that seem like fun!). Currently, kiloFarad capacitors can be found on electric cars and the like (surge/load balancing).

      I would think the ESR is a larger, less common unit as well - though with the ESR and BGE being close to an order of magintude of each other, it would seem reasonable to choose whichever had the more completely documented absolute value.

      --
      "It's tough to be bilingual when you get hit in the head."
  76. Only one real problem. by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    The PR release says one must ask for the source to a particular binary by name. To be in compliance, if I have say a BEFSR41 router and I send a SASE asking to the source for any GPLed binary in the router then they have to do it. I should not have to crawl around their firmware and figure it all out. As far as the GPL is concerned, having the router or a firmware update file entitles me to do this. This is no big deal, just roll up a tarball. They can even say "HERE!" in a surly voice.

  77. I VOMIT ON FAILURES!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text, just VOMIT!!!!!

  78. The Dirty Secret Of The AntiVirus Industry by xdroop · · Score: 4, Informative
    Something I wrote for my own personal site.

    I'm getting sick of the juvenile hair pulling which passes for morning radio here in Ottawa these days, so this morning I was flipping around during the drive to a client site. I landed on one of the CBC stations, and they were talking about this uproar caused by the Calgary university teaching a course which included a module on how to write viruses.

    The controversy is that many of the anti-virus organizations say that they will not cooperate with the university if they are writing viruses. That it is irresponsible to give people the knowledge they can use to release even more viruses out into the wild.

    There were two interviews, one by someone against the course (and he was keen to point out that the virus writing component was the only component he objected to, and that the rest of the course was fine by him) and by the head of the Computer Science division at the university.

    According to the opponent, the problem was that there were quite enough viruses out there thank you very much and we did not need more people with the knowledge of how to pump out more. This was countered by the professor who pointed out that anyone who was in a fourth-year accredited computer science program all ready had the knowledge needed and could bang one out in a couple of hours. In other words, they already have the knowledge to write the viruses, so what is the big deal?

    The point danced around by both gentlemen is that there is a dirty little secret in the anti-virus community. The industry of virus detection and removal is by definition a reactive rather than a proactive process.

    Let's back up here for a little background. When you are writing a virus scanner, you only have two ways to detect a virus, which I describe as the what it is technique and the what it does technique. In other words, in using the first technique you recognize a virus because you have already seen this virus before and therefore know exactly what it is. The second technique is used to recognize a virus by what it does, virus-like activities.

    To put this into terms that everyone can understand, the what it is technique is similar to the police knowing that John Q. Criminal is a mugger because he's been convicted of mugging people in the past. The what it does technique is similar to the police witnessing John Q. Criminal hitting another citizen over the head and absconding with his wallet -- recognizing such behaviour as mugger-type activity, and reacting accordingly.

    Back to our world of viruses. The what it is technique is a list of signatures of viruses which have been seen before. A signature is a string of some kind, along with some other data (such as the expected location of said string in the suspect virus, the expected length of the suspect virus, and so on). With this information you can categorically say: "This is a virus." And all of us with virus scanners know about this, because it is this information which is constantly being updated by our vendors.

    The what it does method of recognition is much much harder. It is called heuristics, and it is supposed to recognize virus-like activity so that the requirement for an up-to-date signature file is no longer needed.

    To understand why this is so hard, consider this example. Suppose that I am a virus, and I am going to propagate myself. What I will have to do at some point is open a file to save myself so that I can be run at a later date. The operating system hosting me (Windows, for example) knows that I've asked to open this file. Now how is the virus scanner on the same computer supposed to know that I'm about to write myself out to that file, instead of being about to write out harmless Microsoft Word data? You can't determine the intent behind the program's request for system accesses -- and therefore you can not make intelligent decisions as to if you should intervene, preventing the request

    --
    you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    1. Re:The Dirty Secret Of The AntiVirus Industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Minor nit - the fact that Outlook processes mails automatically or that it looks for commands in them is not the problem. This has been done for a long time (e.g. mailing list servers) and does not in itself cause problems.

      The problem is that Outlook allows types of executable attachments that were not designed for that purpose. This feature should never have existed in the first place, and should have been disabled altogether the moment the first virus incident occurred at the latest, but instead it's being plugged a few content types at a time...

      As a non-Windows-user, I'll admit that I don't know whether the way Outlook implements its useful features makes it technically inconvenient to fix things correctly once and for all without losing compatibility, but surely it wouldn't have been unreasonable considering how much viruses have cost MS customers.

    2. Re:The Dirty Secret Of The AntiVirus Industry by xdroop · · Score: 1
      You are correct, of course -- I had not thought of list servers. I think then the distinction would be having a program which read mail and did one or two things as opposed to having a fully-fledged scripting language embedded in your email client.

      The whole thing was written more as a average-person-friendly rebuttal to the radio program than a detailed technical analysis.

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
  79. Misdirected mail by 87C751 · · Score: 1

    Some years ago when I lived in Nome, Alaska, my girlfriend's mother sent her a note and left the Zip code off. It took nearly 3 months to arrive, because it had been misdirected to Saudi Arabia. The envelope was backstamped in Arabic! (backstamping is the convention of applying a postmark to the back of an envelope when a misdirected piece of mail is identified as such)

    --
    Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
  80. Re:Need help choosing a new computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judging by the responses to this comment, there are a few people who are too fucking stupid to realize the original poster is probably as anti-gay as they are. At least he has a rudimentary grasp of irony, despite the hateful, pointless and boring way he used it.

  81. Yeah it is pretty slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm only getting 520kB/s

  82. GNU is not *nix by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    Just the other day, I was wondering if a particular company would go after the FSF for violation of their trademark. "GNU's not *n|x" is similar to "based on JBoss". It should be OK, but is it?

  83. USPS experiences by SolemnDragon · · Score: 1
    When i was living in MA, USA: Box was sent to me by my mother. Insured. They let someone across town sign for it, with a different name and a different address. And what was worse, my mother had to fight (and i think she lost) at getting the insurance for it, since "It was signed for."

    Foster, RI, USA: The mailman was a raging alcoholic. We'd see him drive up the hill on one side of the road, put mail in the mailboxes, drive down our side of the road, put mail in the mailboxes, drive up the other side of the road again and take the mail out, throw it in the backseat, and put other mail in the box. We compared notes, once we discovered that the letters he was putting in the second time were a random handful from the mail bag. One time someone on our street got an empty beer bottle, a flyer from some store or other, and a copy of a magazine addressed to someone else.

    Vermont, USA: Every personal letter going out made it to destination within three days. Every personal letter coming IN took at least three weeks. That was a few years ago, i hope it's better now. But you could also put cash in your mailbox and the letter carrier would leave you stamps. AND CHANGE, when your cash exceeded the amount of a multiple of stamp price. If you specified what stamps- 2 cents, 29 cents, whatever, they'd do their best to accommodate, or they'd take the cash, leave a receipt and a note stating what you needed and had paid for, and deliver it the next day. You could also take the note into the post office, where it could be redeemed. Brandon Vermont was a very honest town. (one time a gas attendent further north walked off his job, leaving the pumps on and the office closed. When the proprieter came by the next day -and i am not joking- there was money piled inside the door. $0.99 more than what was taken from the pumps. It made the news.)

    Boston, MA. Not only do they randomly forward mail, I frequently get mail sent from inside Boston to an address here in Boston- with postmarks from towns far away, From western Mass., twice from other states. Does anybody remember the mailman from the movie, "Funny Farm"? There's a reason that the sterotype carries on...

    Oh. In Britain, do you have volunteers to answer the Dear Santa letters?

    1. Re:USPS experiences by leshert · · Score: 1

      But you could also put cash in your mailbox and the letter carrier would leave you stamps. AND CHANGE, when your cash exceeded the amount of a multiple of stamp price. If you specified what stamps- 2 cents, 29 cents, whatever, they'd do their best to accommodate, or they'd take the cash, leave a receipt and a note stating what you needed and had paid for, and deliver it the next day.

      Ahh... you're bringing back memories. I grew up in rural Pennsylvania, and it sounds very similar. We also had a party telephone line.

      Now they have DSL, supposedly, but they _still_ haven't run cable television up the valley where I used to live.

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. How dare you impose your will on me. by Damek · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like my "fragile biological form", and if I want to live on Mars one day, how dare you suggest you're going to rip it up. As a future citizen of Mars, I regard that as a declaration of war.

    In all seriousness, I have to say I think that is one of the most idiotic ideas I've ever heard. Most people like living in a biosphere. As much as I enjoy the works of Iain Banks, Ken MacLeod and Alastair Reynolds, and one day the universe probably will include many different cultures with body-changing, identity-shifting citizens, shouldn't there also be a place in that future universe for those of us who want to live on the planet of our choosing, in ways not too dissimilar from how humans have lived since the dawn of time?

    If you must, use the asteroids, there's plenty to share. At worst, use a planet with much less chance of being terraformed. But stay away from Mars.

    Frankly, I think you're deluding yourself if you really think technology is advancing so fast that we'll be ripping up Mars before terraforming it. Kurzweil is a prat, and most of what he says is nothing more than wishful thinking.

  86. HOLY SHIT YOU SIR ARE TEH GHEY!!!1 by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    Jesus fucking christ do they let any asswipe post to slashdot these days?

    I have half a mind to ram an anal plug into your nostrils for spouting that shit. What the fuck is wrong with legal uses for p2p?!!! DO YOU WANT TO GO TO ASS-RAPE PRISON?

    I can just see it now:

    Hey pretty little one, what are you in here fo'?

    Um, well ::trembling:: I VIOLATED THE DMCA!!!

    Hahaha! Okay that's it, we're going to triple team you


    And thus ends slashdot theatre. Goodnight folks!

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  87. Obligatory Matrix Quote (ish) by krysith · · Score: 1

    Tell me, Mr. andersen , what good is source code if you are unable to comply with the GPL? ;)

  88. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try EP bonehead. (EP=Eighth Post!)

  89. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least this troll has a sense of humor :-)

  90. ack! DMCA by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the DMCA really is a piece of shit isn't it...

  91. Re:Need help choosing a new computer by KingArthur10 · · Score: 1

    Sorry about the whole "Username"/"Screen name" mixup. lol. And if you want to know what the KingArthur10 thing is, well, Arthur is my real name. I have used the AIM SN KingArthur10 since the 6th grade (7 years ago). On almost every one of the message boards I visit, I use the same name, so for the most part, if someone wanted to know how to reach me, it would be pretty darn easy to find me/contact me.

    --
    I came, I saw, She conquered.
  92. About Red Mars the book, I hated it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll be honest, I hated that book by the time I finished it. It was well written, but I had serious problems with the plot and sudden re-appearance of characters. To explain further would give the ending of the book away, and I won't do that. I was so unhappy that I never read the rest of the series.

    My 2 cents are now spent.

  93. Use it to check your CDs by benjamindees · · Score: 1
    MD5 summing is also useful to make sure your .iso burned correctly. This script can be used under Linux to make sure you don't make toasters:

    CDDEVICE=scd0
    CDMOUNTDIR=/cdrom

    mount $CDMOUNTDIR
    size=`df |grep $CDDEVICE| awk '{ print($2) }'`
    count=`expr $size / 2`
    umount $CDMOUNTDIR
    dd if=/dev/$CDDEVICE bs=2k count=$count |md5sum


    BTW, does anyone know how to actually retrieve the SHA1 sum from a .torrent file?
    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  94. sent by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    But they replied that a bribe said otherwise. For the low-low price of a unix distributer's license plus $29.95, I can get my tip heard.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.