Slashdot Mirror


Funding for TIA All But Dead

Shackleford writes "Wired has an article saying that the Terrorism Information Awareness program, which would troll Americans' personal records to find terrorists before they strike, may soon face the same fate Congress meted out to John Ashcroft in his attempt to create a corps of volunteer domestic spies: death by legislation. The Senate's $368 billion version of the 2004 defense appropriations bill, released from committee to the full Senate on Wednesday, contains a provision that would deny all funds to, and thus would effectively kill, the Terrorism Information Awareness program, formerly known as Total Information Awareness. TIA's projected budget for 2004 is $169 million."

352 comments

  1. Long Road Ahead by dtolton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At least they are putting some strong language into this version of
    the bill "No funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the
    Department of Defense ... or to any other department, agency or
    element of the Federal Government, may be obligated or expended on
    research and development on the Terrorism Information Awareness
    program."

    If the full senate doesn't approve this bill, the entire issue is
    pretty much stillborn. Assuming they approve it though, there are
    still several more steps for it to go through.

    The main concern at this point is what happens when the bill goes to
    committee. This process has always held concerns for me, but it
    worries me that whether or not the defunding stays in the bill or not
    is so dependant on one person. "The defunding has a chance of
    surviving committee " Schwartz says "If Stevens is behind it, then it
    almost certainly will happen.". I would have felt more comfortable if
    he had said "It will almost certainly succeed."

    Let's just hope he's behind defunding it. Removing the defunding
    would completely remove the teeth from this bill IMO.

    I also didn't see any comments from President Bush. As I understand
    it, he is supportive of the TIA. Will he sign a bill that is going to
    kill one of his pet projects? Again, let's hope so.

    There are still a lot of steps for this bill to go through before it
    becomes law. Progress is being made, but let your senator know that
    you are against TIA, and maybe this bill will make it.

    --

    Doug Tolton

    "The destruction of a value which is, will not bring value to that which isn't." -John Galt
    1. Re:Long Road Ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the full senate doesn't approve this bill

      Since when is a unanimous vote necessary to pass a bill?

  2. Info ... by Arthaed · · Score: 5, Informative

    An Executive Summary of TIA released by DARPA is available here. An explanation and overview of TIA, again by DARPA, can be found here.

    --
    Unique signatures are rare.
    1. Re:Info ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An summarized review report cannot be found here. A peer evaluation system performed on DARPA also cannot be found here.

    2. Re:Info ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a FAQ:

      http://www.darpa.mil/iao/TIA_FAQs.pdf

      It would be better if /. readers were to actually read about the program instead of parroting the misinformation that the news media has been spreading. Also, there are other programs that are now implemented (e.g., CAPS) that are putting innocent Americans in jail now, with no chance to get a hearing, get off the secret lists, or even find out if they're ON secret lists. Wake up!

  3. Don't worry, by Captain+Pedantic · · Score: 1

    There'll soon be some more funding for it.

    --

    None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
    1. Re:Don't worry, by nanojath · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yeah, don't forget that John Poindexter is in charge... he's an old hand at, um, unconventional funding of "special" government projects. Maybe his old buddies in the CIA can help him move a little ultra-pure heroin from our new buddies, the warlords of Afghanistan.


      Go ahead and mod it funny... I wish it was more of a joke.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  4. well... by ed.han · · Score: 5, Interesting

    except i have one question: what if they simply rename the darned thing? it's only $169 million: in beltway terms, this isn't a whole lot of money.

    what worries me is that this could sneak into some other omnibus legislation through a rider under a different and more innocuous name, under a last-minute change to another bill before congress.

    i fear this may become a senatorial shell-game.

    ed

    1. Re:well... by Monkelectric · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How funding works ...

      You don't need to worry about what congress approves, you need to worry about what congress doesn't know about.

      The top level super secret shit is called "black projects". Funding for black projects doesn't come through washington, and isn't controlled by congress. Nobody knows *where* the funding for a black projects come from, but there is a ton of it. I have a few friends who work on them, and have interviewed for jobs at places that do black projects (which is how I became aware of them). So my answer to you is, you don't need to be worried about things congress funds, because congress doesn't even know about the good stuff.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean like when Lisa paperclips the bill to redirect the flight patterns to a bill that just has to pass? :)

    3. Re:well... by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even sneakier, development on this could be pursued by a private agency, betting on the commercial prospects once it has been proven out.

      Imagine the value of a centralized database that gathers together just public information about people, let alone private. Basically, it would become an automated mini-private eye service, which could mined for all sorts of useful information.

      Just because this might not survive the Congress doesn't mean the idea won't be pursued...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:well... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Nobody knows *where* the funding for a black projects come from, but there is a ton of it.

      $400 toilet seats anyone?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    5. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard tell that three letter agencies often get around the law by hiring contractors to do jobs outside of the U.S. Indian reservations, like the Cabazon indian reservation for example, are considered to be soveriegn territory, so I am told.

    6. Re:well... by wik · · Score: 1
      $400 toilet seats anyone?



      No those are typically gold-plate.

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    7. Re:well... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      This has already been going on for quite some time actually. If companies can get away with selling the information, they've already done so and it is now in the hand of data aggregation companies.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:well... by wik · · Score: 2, Informative

      They already renamed it once from Total Information Awareness to Terrorism Information Awareness:

      http://www.epic.org/privacy/profiling/tia/

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    9. Re:well... by 2short · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "The top level super secret shit is called 'black projects'".

      People call various levels of secret things "black projects", particularly in the movies. I'm willing to bet that "top level super secret shit" is called a variety of things, and you don't know any of them.

      "Funding for black projects doesn't come through washington, and isn't controlled by congress."

      Then it doesn't come from tax dollars, and I don't care.

      "Nobody knows *where* the funding for a black projects come from, but there is a ton of it."

      Maybe it comes from magic elves! Of course someone knows where it comes from. Several someones in congress know where it comes from because they approve it. Just because they don't tell you doesn't mean they don't know. And while it may be officially secret how much is spent on various secret projects, it's not exactly hard to figure out the general outlines. For example, a significant chunk of secret spending is buried in the Air Force budget. (The Air Force buys a bunch of really expensive things, frequently with perfectly good reasons to be quiet about them, so confusing the issue of just how much really expensive stuff they bought is not too hard.)

    10. Re:well... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Everyone knows where the funding comes from; sales of drugs and armaments, not to mention siphoning off various programs. Hence the $100,000 hammers and shit like that. Of course all they have to do is pad costs on everything by 5% and bango, money, and a lot less obvious than the above.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:well... by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      it's only $169 million: in beltway terms, this isn't a whole lot of money.
      Are you kidding? It's a total waste of money! My DSL account only costs $50 a month, and unlike TIA, it gives me real PPP, not some dumb emulated SLIP.

      (Sorry, but somebody had to do this one, for the old-timers.)

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    12. Re:well... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      A dark, ominous project called "Google" is already doing this, with chilling results.

      If you use this tool with my nickname, "das megabyte," you will get my name, address, and phone number within minutes. You may even discover some of my other aliases and projects.

      It takes a little parsing. But that's why we've got highly paid DBAs, no?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    13. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make money from having a monopoly on the illicit drug market. I'm sure they have other ways, too.

    14. Re:well... by Slime-dogg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is a provision in the DoD funding specifically for black ops. Senate knows that there *is* money going into them, although they all know that there is no way that they will know what the money is spent on. For all we know, TIA has been a thriving force since 1980.

      All money for government goes through the house, regardless of what people may think. The military / CIA / NSA need to request funds from congress in order to do their operations. These funds end up looking like "Monkey Wrench" and "Toilet Seat," because these are good non-descriptive words that act as substitutes.

      The wording of the bill is interesting, however, since it doesn't specify what can get the money, rather is specifies what cannot get the money. This way, congress can limit what the intelligence department can do with the money, without them actually knowing what they really are doing.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    15. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine the value of a centralized database that gathers together just public information about people, let alone private. Basically, it would become an automated mini-private eye service, which could mined for all sorts of useful information.

      Yeah, and just imagine if you gathered just public information about corporations. Oh wait...

    16. Re:well... by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      One documented example is the "civilian" American outfit that recently got hit in Saudi Arabia. This was a private company in charge of training the elite forces of Saudi Arabia. Its funding came from the House of Saud, but that "private" outfit was under the complete control of one American government official.

      Another documented example is Israel. Israel distributes funding and weapons to our friends throughout the world. And not just to the Middle East, Israel has been linked to many of our black ops in South America.

      The relationship with Israel is reminiscent of the old days. The Catholic Church used jews to be tax collectors. Now, the United States uses Israel to be our military enforcers. The plan is simple. People in the world are going to hate the United States as much as they hated the Catholic Church, but Israel and the jews are going to always bear the overwhelming brunt of that Hate.

    17. Re:well... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      No those are typically gold-plate.

      I see...So we sold them to Saddam to fund our black ops that resulted in Stealth aircraft that bombed the crap out of him.
      At least now we can get them back...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    18. Re:well... by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then it doesn't come from tax dollars, and I don't care.

      Well no, it does come from tax dollars. Do you think that congress takes the time to see how the money is actually spent after it allocates it? Does congress know that Ashcroft's office isn't paying out "salary" to employees it doesn't actually have? I wouldn't be suprised if after congress "kills" TIA by not funding it, that Ashcroft's office suddenly finds itself with a few new employees, like "Thomas I. Anglemeyer" and "Theresa I. Allman". I'm sure they're even better at making up fake names than I am. And if they can't make up enough names, they'll suddenly need to order new "$500" toilet seats and hammers.

      The fact is, if you're a conspiracy nut, nothing the government will do will convince you that TIA is gone. If you're not a conspiracy nut, why are you reading this, since to you, TIA was never a problem in the first place?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    19. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funding comes from the "Black Project" fund. We know how much is spent, in total, on black projects, but not what they are. Individually, the projects have no congressional oversite.

    20. Re:well... by BrynM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Steps to funding Black Ops
      1. Start Super-Classified Government Project
      2. ????
      3. Profit!
      4. Fund Super-Classified Government Project with step 3

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    21. Re:well... by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      is called a variety of things, and you don't know any of them.

      I'm not claiming to be an expert, just telling slashdotters what I know ... I only know what I was told at my interview, which obviously is very not-secret but still might be interesting.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    22. Re:well... by TrollBurger · · Score: 0


      A very large amount of funding for 'Black Projects' comes from CIA Cocaine and Heroin smuggling which has been going on for decades.

      http://www.sumeria.net/politics/cia-coke.html

      http://www.serendipity.li/cia/solomon.html

      http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/pandora/blac ks-targeted.html"

      These are just the first three links from a google search on 'CIA Cocaine'. There is tons of evidence from it.

      Download or buy "The Truth and Lies of 9-11" which is a lecture/speech by Mike Ruppert for much of the info. He's an ex LAPD Drug Squad officer who has been trying to expose the multi billion dollar drug smuggling activities of the CIA and related organisations.

      Wake up, your government is *lying* you you America.

    23. Re:well... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      The GAO (General Accounting Office) is charged by the Constitution to ensure that money is spent as directed by congress, and that the money is spent in an effective manner.

      "Black Projects" do not exist. The budget may be classified, but if Congress does not cut a check, the item does not exist on the budget.

      From the CIA Website (http://www.odci.gov/cia/public_affairs/faq.html#3 ):

      How many people work for the Central Intelligence Agency and what is its budget?

      Neither the number of employees nor the size of the Agency's budget can, at present, be publicly disclosed. A common misconception is that the Agency has an unlimited budget, which is far from true. While classified, the budget and size of the CIA are known in detail and scrutinized by the Office of Management and Budget and by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and the Defense Subcommittees of the Appropriations Committees in both houses of Congress. The resources allocated to the CIA are subject to the same rigorous examination and approval process that applies to all other government organizations.

      In 1997, the aggregate figure for all U.S. government intelligence and intelligence-related activities--of which the CIA is but one part--was made public for the first time. The aggregate intelligence budget was $26.6 billion in fiscal year 1997 and $26.7 billion for fiscal year 1998. The intelligence budget for fiscal year 1999 has not been publicly released.
      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    24. Re:well... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      You haven't ever read a credit report, have you?

      Past residences, previous names, bank accounts, employers, spouses, bills, loans, all there for the asking. I was half expecting to see my speeding tickets, parking fines, and overdue library books.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    25. Re:well... by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      So my representatives' time is being spent going over every item on the receipt, interviewing the individual who did the purchase, and the individual which sold the goods, to make sure that the $500 toilet seats really are $500, and that the CIA didn't come up with a very real-looking receipt?

      You're not being paranoid enough. There are always things in the government that Official X doesn't know about. I'm just trying to get the paranoiacs to bite by pointing out that its entirely possible for all these ridiculous (congress-approved) expenditures to be a smokescreen for something more sinister than toilet seats, ashtrays, and hammers.

      What do you think? Where does the extra $450 of a $500 toilet seat go? Enough toilet seats and I could buy a decent fighter jet. Does congress know that all $500 of those dollars really did go to the manufacturer of the toilet seat? That toilet seats weren't bought for $50 each, then the number inflated to make secret project money secretly disappear?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    26. Re:well... by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      You're not being paranoid enough.

      I think that accuratley describes the situation here. This guy refuses to believe the government doesn't want us to know about ceartin projects? Whats hard to believe about that ? And he says "black projects don't exist" point blank when I have friends who work on them, and have interviewed for them myself...

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    27. Re:well... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      ... And he says "black projects don't exist" point blank when I have friends who work on them, and have interviewed for them myself...

      Man, you can't say anything on the Internet these days. You say the sky is blue and someone in Tunesia is quick to point out that where he lives it is mostly pink from the dust kicked up by the desert. You say 2+2=4 and some smart ass will say that answer is really 11 in base 3.

      How am I supposed to combat first hand fact with my ill-concieved simplistic notions of the world?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    28. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the business plan for the Carlysle Group.

    29. Re:well... by waveclaw · · Score: 1
      except i have one question: what if they simply rename the darned thing?


      I'd help me if they'd rename it. Was I the only one who saw the title of this article and thought 'I knew the telecom industry[1] was on hard times, but I just got used to calling them TIA-586A and TIA-568B[2], what will I do now?'


      Sheesh. You'd think that in a ligitious country like the USA there'd be some kind of TLA Trademark system to keep people suing over attaching things like 'Terrorist' and 'Total Information' to harmless things like 'Awareness' (God forbid they every attach 'Freedom' and 'From Unresonable Search and Seizure' we know how much good it did last time, and FFUSAS is such a long, ugly ETLA anyway.)


      [1] TIA - Telecommunication Industry Association, not to be confused with GmbH or the Travel Industry Association of America (which should be TIAA IMHO)


      [2] TIA-568B (OW/O/GW/B/BW/G/BrW/Br) to TIA-568B is the standard pin-out ordering for RJ-45 termination used with Cat-5 and Cat-5e UTP copper cabling when used for 'generic' Ethernet. The numberings originally come from an older U.S. consortia, but have been adopted by TIA for industry-wide use.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    30. Re:well... by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Do you think that congress takes the time to see how the money is actually spent after it allocates it?"

      Yes. There are at least a couple large agencies whose job is exactly that.

      "If you're not a conspiracy nut, why are you reading this, since to you, TIA was never a problem in the first place?"

      TIA was a problem even if you're not a conspiracy nut. Hence it's demise. When Congress specifically denies funding for something, the government should not do it, or people should go to jail. At least one person who stood up before congress to take responsibility for doing something congress said the government should not got pardoned by Bush Sr. and now has a job in Jrs administration, which takes a little of the nut out of conspiracy nuts...

      On a tangent, the reason the $500 toilet seats made big news a while back was not that the military was using them to disguise secret spending on other things. That would have waranted a small chuckle, and advice that they try something less obvious. The scandal was that they really did spend $500 on a toilet seat.

    31. Re:well... by 2short · · Score: 1

      You were told at your interview that you would be working on projects that were not cleared by congress? That you would be paid with unauthorized government funds? Usually they don't mention the part about major federal crimes until after you're hired...

      I suspect you were told you would be working on a "black" project. Which is just a generic (but cool-sounding to interviewees) term for classified projects. I don't dispute that the government funds all sorts of secret projects. Just the concept that there is all this funding mysteriously appearing without congress knowing about it. Congress approves lots of funding for secret things, and keeps fairly close track of where that and other money goes. It seems more reasonable that the projects your friends work on, and you interviewed for, are funded by congress in perfectly straightforward ways.

    32. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The relationship with Israel is reminiscent of the old days. The Catholic Church used jews to be tax collectors.

      Only some of them, the vast majority of Jews have historically been treated very badly by the Vatican.

      Now, the United States uses Israel to be our military enforcers. The plan is simple. People in the world are going to hate the United States as much as they hated the Catholic Church,

      Are you sure they don't already?

      but Israel and the jews are going to always bear the overwhelming brunt of that Hate.

      One thing to remember is that Israel only represents a minority of people calling themselves "Jews". With the strongest attacks on the existance on the existance of the Israeli state being made by Orthodox Rabbis.

    33. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >i fear this may become a senatorial shell-game.
      may?
      you are optimistic...

      l8,
      AC

  5. Great by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Funny

    It looks like the terrorists won, all because a few million Americans didn't want some new shadowy government agency perusing their most confidential records. How un-American.

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like that 'democracy' thing.

    2. Re:Great by acidtripp101 · · Score: 1
      <humor>
      or something close, anyway...
      </humor>

      <info>
      It's actually NOT a democracy, the united states bears a closer resemblance to a democratic republic. The idea is the same, but the execution is DEFINATLY not.
      </info>
      --
      Not Free(as in beer). Free(as in "I'm free to beat you over the head for being a dumbass")
    3. Re:Great by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      And won't it just be you that bitches about how incompetent our intelligence services are the next time something like 9/11 happens.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    4. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the US is described a democratic republic. But it sounds like doublethink to me.

      But "democratic" as a word to describe a government is practically meaningless, though. It's more accurate to just say it's a republic.

  6. Of course, they would never ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Insightful
    go around the intent of Congress and use "black" funds to support widespread domestic spying. That would be wrong.

    I'm sleeping easier now.

    1. Re:Of course, they would never ... by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Of course not. They'll use the unicorns to spy on you.


      Prove the unicorns don't exist, either.

    2. Re:Of course, they would never ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should start lobbying the NAACP before it's to late?

    3. Re:Of course, they would never ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is exactly what happened during the Iran-Contra activities. For those who weren't around in the 80's, Google for Oliver North, Boland Amendment, etc.

    4. Re:Of course, they would never ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they locked thier Unicorn up?

    5. Re:Of course, they would never ... by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You idiot fuckers. If this is off-topic, so is every goddamn conspiracy-theory nutjob post "They'll get the money somewhere else!!!" What is this, a web-board for Art Bell?

      asses

  7. Dead but not forgotten by Fux+the+Pengiun · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Don't worry, it'll be back. Check the article:
    The Senate bill's language is simple but comprehensive: "No funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the Department of Defense ... or to any other department, agency or element of the Federal Government, may be obligated or expended on research and development on the Terrorism Information Awareness program."
    The program just got bad press is all, as many alarmists who shrieked loudly about "civil liberties" shouted down the program's supporters. The same work will still be done, just by different departments under a different name. It says "no funding will go to the TIA", but it doesn't say the essence of the TIA won't live on in another agency's budget. I don't think it's entirely a bad thing either...just so long as they don't go too far. I don't care if they want to see my credit history, just not my Safeway preferred customer card spending habits. That shit is sacred.
    --
    Consensual sex is boring.
    1. Re:Dead but not forgotten by HBI · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, consider this program as a lightning rod. With all the vitriol spewed in Poindexter's direction, wonder what else slipped in under the radar.

      It's a move worthy of say, a Karl Rove, don't you think?

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    2. Re:Dead but not forgotten by KU_Fletch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The program just got bad press is all, as many alarmists who shrieked loudly about "civil liberties" shouted down the program's supporters

      Yeah, how dare we want our things like privacy. Next thing you know we'll want to be able to say or write something without big brother flagging us as a terrorist. Where will the insanity stop!!!??

      --
      It's not stupid. It's advanced.
    3. Re:Dead but not forgotten by elmegil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's an interesting point. We were all wondering why they'd use such an obviously Illuminati inspired logo, but it would make sense for them to go "over the top" with something and someone specifically as a feint, with the real nasties coming in elsewhere.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:Dead but not forgotten by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      We were all wondering why they'd use such an obviously Illuminati inspired logo

      And they did it even more so for the cognoscenti. IAO is the secret name of God in (fringe) freemasonry, so a logo depicting the pyramid and the all-seeing eye is appropriate.

    5. Re:Dead but not forgotten by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Learn you symbolism. The "All Seeing Eye" sits above all sides of the issues. This is a concept of neutrality and objectivity, not control.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    6. Re:Dead but not forgotten by tuber · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like you got trolled, buddy.....

    7. Re:Dead but not forgotten by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      Learn you symbolism.

      Wtf? So the All-Seeing Eye is not a fitting logo for an organisation named after God? Besides, in freemasonry the symbolism depends on your level of initiation, the same symbols can have very different meanings.

      The Eye of Horus and the magic pyramid symbols only reveal their true meaning in the 32nd of the Scottish rite and the 19th of the York rite. Read up before you claim things you don't know about.

  8. Re:I WISH!! by NecroPuppy · · Score: 1

    I know I'm responding to a troll, but...

    Such would be unconstitutional, as it would be a violation of due process. Just because he has done the same, does not make it right to violate his rights.

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
  9. I volunteer by Timesprout · · Score: 2, Funny

    To monitor posts on /. for a small portion (1-2%) of that $368 billion

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  10. The project will just use hidden funding. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Denying funding does not mean there is no money for a project. It simply means that the project will use hidden funding. The U.S. government has established that it does not need to tell its citizens how the citizen's money is spent.

    1. Re:The project will just use hidden funding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that? The government just lost another $4 trillion?

    2. Re:The project will just use hidden funding. by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The TIA is a rather high-profile project that needs some access to some pretty heavily watched data sources. You could, in theory, still do all of it in the black, but you're going to need a ton of people to be in on it. And unlike Iran-Contra, this time those people are in country.

      That's what it would be, after all... a whole new Iran-Contra scandal, but with much more clear (il)legalities. And while Ashcroft would certainly be first in line, it's questionable that Bush would be able to insulate himself from an illegally funded project that he supported.

      It's much more likely that it'll die and be resurrected again in a couple years under a different name.

      But thank you for the paranoia all the same.

    3. Re:The project will just use hidden funding. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you think that SDI R&D actually stopped in the late 80s? There was no longer explicit funding coming from congress referring to that program shortly after the Berlin Wall, but the program continued, simply split into pieces under a different set of names.

      That's how we "miraculously" had an ABM system reappear as a soon-to-be deploymented program. Nevermind the will of the people on funding it.

    4. Re:The project will just use hidden funding. by dhodell · · Score: 1

      "Yes but"(tm)

      In a couple of years time, BushCo will be gone. Everybody regrets voting for that wanker (everyone I've talked to, anyway). I mean, I don't think anybody with such a resume would really get re-elected. But then again, you never know.

      In any case, it'd be super difficult to do any black ops involving the president at a time when presidential change is just coming closer. Sure bills can get pushed through congress super fast, but things like this one will take time, and there's no guarantee that Bush will still be there when this bill or other ones like it finally make it through.

      On the other hand, our government does really weird things...

      --
      Kind regards, Devon H. O'Dell
    5. Re:The project will just use hidden funding. by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      I think you're going to be in for a rude awakening next year.

      Right now, it looks almost certain that Bush is going to be re-elected. He has a 60% approval rating, and while that's slipped, it's still very high. The Democrats are, once again, utterly failing to put forth a significant presidential candidate and are flailing hopelessly without a significant platform to stand on. Oh, and Bush has so far raised something like $25M for his re-election campaign. The leading Democrat candidate (in fund raising anyway) has only raised about $10-15M. It's looking like Bush will be able to run his campaign without any matching Federal funds, while the Democrats will have to apply for them. This means that Bush will not be constrained in how or how much he spends the funds... which is not true if you apply for Federal funds.

      I'm not at all happy with Bush, and will certainly not be voting for him (I'm most likely to vote Libretarian, but that depends on the candidate). But right now it's looking very much like another 4 years of idiocy in the White House. Of course, that's likely to be true even if someone else gets elected, but it's a matter of which idiot :)

  11. Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Think about it: he's got a threat out there with a demonstrated ability to perform mass killings, and he'd prefer not to die in a fireball of aviation fuel. Neither would his boss, his boss' replacement, nor any of his immediate colleagues.

    Meanwhile, his former colleagues are hounding him because he still doesn't really have a good answer on who mailed the anthrax.

    If I ever saw a man grasping for straws, Ashcroft's that man. I think I understand where he's been coming from in all this (ever been hounded by QA and PHBs?), and I feel for him.

    Even so, I'm glad TIA is dead.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by datacide · · Score: 1

      If he can't do his job, perhaps he should resign.

    2. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Think about it: he's got a threat out there with a demonstrated ability to perform mass killings, and he'd prefer not to die in a fireball of aviation fuel. Neither would his boss, his boss' replacement, nor any of his immediate colleagues.

      Utterly irrelevant. You can only do the 9/11 trick once. After that, hijacking a plane becomes suicide by violent business executive. More to the point, none of this TIA crap would help catch terrorists. What would have worked is if we listned to the warning signs (flight school with concerns about a student who only needs to know how to steer planes, killing an FBI investigation because it got too close to the Saudi royal family) and, perhaps, stop funding these guys ourselves (both Saddam and OBL were our buddies back in the 80's. Of course we could also stop being so belligerent with the rest of the world, but that'll never happen with Bush the lesser in office.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mediocrity is no excuse. Neither is conservative idealism that has no grounding in reality....I hope he suffers.

    4. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by ouzel · · Score: 1


      Exactly. Why else do you think the White House would be hindering all efforts of the 9/11 inquiry panel? They should have noticed the warning signs, and paid attention to the U.S. Commission on National Security for the 21st Century's report

    5. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "If I ever saw a man grasping for straws, Ashcroft's that man. "

      That's what's really scary. Not that he's evil, but he's taking ill-concieved action in his uniformed attempt to do the right thing.

    6. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by SirLanse · · Score: 0

      Suicide by violent business executive.
      Yea that guy who had is nail clippers taken away.
      I say give everyone access to a bowie knife, then hijacking a plane is suicide. Oh and feed thier testicles to dogs.

    7. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > he'd prefer not to die in a fireball of aviation fuel. Neither would his boss, his boss' replacement, nor any of his immediate colleagues.

      But anyone else (say, a regular old non-multi-$ contributer to the gop) is fair game.

    8. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fulcrum of Evil wrote:
      Of course we could also stop being so belligerent with the rest of the world, but that'll never happen with Bush the lesser in office.

      I'm glad you've reduced international politics to such a simple matter. Why, everyone will just *adore* the USA if we simply become isolationist? Quite frankly, I wouldn't mind if we did that--I don't really care about problems outside of the USA that don't affect our people--but it just wouldn't work. Surprise, some countries/people would still detest the USA. Do you really think al-Qaeda would stop planning attacks if we pulled out of the Mid-East? Of course not, the fundamentalists would just continue their brutal ways while having the freedom to attack the USA at will.

      The hegemon will always be hated...and there's no mistake that the USA is it.

    9. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      TIA as such would not have. TIA unnecessarily grows the scope of the problem such that it become uncomputable. However, some of the underlying tech was more than capable of exposing the entire 9/11 cabal.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    10. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by XSforMe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      AC troll wrote:

      but it just wouldn't work.
      Well, why not try it? Most of the 19th century the U.S. kept to itself. Guess how many 9/11's it had to withstand.

      Surprise, some countries/people would still detest the USA.
      That is a reasuring reason, glad you are around with your crystal ball to tell us this things.

      Do you really think al-Qaeda would stop planning attacks if we pulled out of the Mid-East?
      Try pull out of Mid-East and stop funding Israel. That should work.

      Of course not, the fundamentalists would just continue their brutal ways while having the freedom to attack the USA at will.
      Then again, you might be right... get that TIA on the road, spy on everybody, think of the rest of the world as terrorist, bomb the hell out of inocent countries, finance any/all subversive groups of any government you dislike. I am sure the rest of the world loves to be addressed in that fashion.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    11. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      opposite of belligerence is not isolation.

      x-axis: agreement.
      y-axis: understanding.

      low agreement, high agreement,
      high understanding: high understanding:
      competition cooperation

      low agreement, high agreement,
      low understanding: low understanding:
      belligerence worship

      isolation is probably somewhere between belligerence
      and worship, the common thread being low understanding.

      ignorance dooms both the individual and the society
      to low understanding.

    12. Re:Ashcroft not completely the bad guy here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Think about it: he's got a threat out there with a demonstrated ability to perform mass killings"

      So whats new?, besides thinking that the bill of rights is an obstacle to be removed. Send that bastards to jail for treason. He's a Facist. As long as the Bush/Ashcroft/Fox News pair keeps the perception that bombings and biological attacks are imminent while using patriotic emotions to justify his political positions instead of publicly stating any objective and trutful arguments, he is an insult to the people of this country wether they know it or not. What he's doing is a dark ard that unfortunatly didnt die with Hitler

      "If I ever saw a man grasping for straws, Ashcroft's that man."

      Hopefully, he will be gasping for air while wearing a pair of concrete shoes.

  12. name change? by Suppafly · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Couldn't they just change the name of the program again to get around the legisilation?

    1. Re:name change? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's propose some new names!

      Totalitarian Information Awareness!

      Who can beat that?

    2. Re:name change? by jobugeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about Thanks In Advance....for removing all your civil liberties. See, they don't even need to change the letters.

      --
      I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    3. Re:name change? by dann0 · · Score: 1

      What about: TIA it aint?

      --
      "The big question in our lives is how to be at the same time a hedonist and in a hurry" - Alain Ducasse (?)
  13. Nervous Senators? by creative_name · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmmm...maybe the Senators were all nervous that a lot of them would be exposed for their own personal "un-American" activities. Ahha! I figured it out!!

    Why is there a black car in front of my house...

    --
    Posting as directed.
    1. Re:Nervous Senators? by Jack+Comics · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Nah. Bill Clinton and his friends were exposed for their un-American activities on several occasions, but the public just didn't seem to give a damn for the most part, thanks to all the spin-doctoring from the liberal media.

      --
      "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:Nervous Senators? by tc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What "un-American" activities are you referring to? The thing that the Republicans seemed to get their panties in the biggest knot about Clinton was his lying about getting a blow-job from an intern. I guess that's somehow considered a more serious matter than, for example, lying to the public about the evidence for taking the country to war?

    3. Re:Nervous Senators? by The+Mayor · · Score: 1

      But I thought the Supreme Court just ruled that oral sex *was* an American activity.

      --
      --Be human.
    4. Re:Nervous Senators? by Requiem · · Score: 1

      Clinton did the same thing when he went after Iraq in 97 or 98 or whenever.

      And before you accuse me of being a conservative, I'd like to point out that in the last federal election (Canadian), I voted Green.

    5. Re:Nervous Senators? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      ...I guess that's somehow considered a more serious matter than, for example, lying to the public about the evidence for taking the country to war?

      Yeah, but war is for _true patriots_ to revel in and celebrate. Anyone else noticed that? We have become a militarized society--we revel in war and in the military, just absolutely wallow in it.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    6. Re:Nervous Senators? by geekee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "lying to the public about the evidence for taking the country to war."

      Isn't there a saying that goes, don't attribute to malice that which can easily be explained by stupidity (this is GW Bush after all). Just because they're wrong, doesn't mean they lied.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    7. Re:Nervous Senators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the bitter moanings of a right-wing nutjob who cares more about who the president fucks than about who the president starts an illegal war against.

    8. Re:Nervous Senators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Yeah, but war is for _true patriots_ to revel in and celebrate. Anyone else noticed that? We have become a militarized society--we revel in war and in the military, just absolutely wallow in it.

      Hey! You say that like it's a bad thing!

    9. Re:Nervous Senators? by tc · · Score: 1
      George W. may be stupid, but I'm struggling to imagine a scenario where merely being slightly slow-witted would account for his actions. Before the war, we were led to believe that Iraq was full of actual weapons of mass destruction, and that no doubt we find them the minute our troops set foot in the country.

      Now of course, we haven't found so much as test-tube, despite having had the run of the country for months, and there's now emerging evidence that perhaps the intelligence data wasn't quite so clear-cut as we were originally led to believe.

      Where's the room for stupidity? Bush clearly knew that there was basically no real evidence in support of his assertions, but told the public a different story so that he could have his war. That's not stupidity, that's gross malfeasence.

      If people considered impeaching Clinton because of a dumb lie about a blow-job, they should sure as hell get rid of someone who put American servicemen in harms way, at the cost of billions of dollars, on a shaky pretext, which they lied to the public about.

    10. Re:Nervous Senators? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Of course. The liberal media like Fox News, Hannity and Colmes, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter. Those bleeding hearts run everything!

      They're in it with the Jews and the Communists...and the Druids!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    11. Re:Nervous Senators? by Jack+Comics · · Score: 0

      I wasn't even referring to the whole Monica Lewinsky bit. There are several things that Bill Clinton did that was completely "un-American." I'll list a few off, and let the educated person look up the information to find out more if he or she wishes.

      1) Bill Clinton made severe cuts to the U.S. military's funding, shutting down bases, and limiting our military might.

      2) Bill Clinton is as much responsible for the war crimes and horror that was the Bosnian-Serb conflict in Yugoslavia as Milosevic. Over 1,000 civilians were directly killed by NATO forces, not to mention all the historic buildings that were destroyed. Bill Clinton and several other members of his administration were even indicted for war crimes related to the 1999 Yugoslavia operations.

      3) Under the Clinton administration, regulations against exports of technology to China were greatly relaxed. In 1996, China had no high-end computers capable of testing nuclear weapons. By 1999, they had 350. Besides that, there were Chinese spies found in Los Alamos stealing our nuclear secrets, but nothing was done about it until 1999!

      4) Clinton's election campaigns received considerable contributions from communist China. In fact, it is believed that Chinese donors were the biggest donors over-all for the 1992 Clinton election campaign. Effectively, Clinton was bribed by China, and committed treason against the U.S.

      5) The supposed "suicide" of Vincent Foster, with a suicide note that was declared a forgery by three different hand-writing experts. Read into that what you will.

      6) Bill Clinton's eleventh-hour pardons. That was yet another form of bribery. Marc Rich anyone?

      7) The rape of Juannita Broaddrick by Bill Clinton. The nurse that attended Juannite Broaddrick after her rape released a statement a month or so ago as a matter of fact, backing her up and stating her belief that Bill Clinton is a rapist.

      I could go on and on, but I won't. Suffice it to say, in my opinion Bill Clinton was one of the worst, if not the, worst President the United States has ever seen, and I hope it never has one as self-centered, arrogant, and brutal as him again.

      --
      "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    12. Re:Nervous Senators? by geekee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, my poorly worded point is that sometimes people are simply wrong. Even the French did not say there were no WMD in Iraq. There were various opinions about what Iraq probably had. Most evidence was to the effect of, "they had such and such chemicals, but can't account for what happended to them." Saying now that there are no WMD in Iraq does not automatically mean that the US and Britian lied about it. To impeach a president, you need to present proof that he lied about the evidence. I'm all for the Democrats investigating the issue. I just get annoyed with people condemning the president without any proof.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    13. Re:Nervous Senators? by gmajor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is absolutely no evidence that Bush knowingly told a lie about weapons of mass destruction. He used information from the same source that Bill Clinton used when he launched a strike on Iraq and Sudan in the late 90's!

      If we're going to nail Bush to the cross, we might as well place Clinton to his right - he ordered a strike on a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan! Can you believe it, a place that makes medicine to save people was bombed at Clinton's behest? But Clinton also had faulty intelligence.

      We need to strengthen our foreign intelligence capabilities in a meaningful way. The problem is not in the White House, and it's not political, but much worse at its root.

    14. Re:Nervous Senators? by tc · · Score: 1
      You have good examples (although I rebut some of them below). However, don't you find it at least slightly bizarre that the biggest political danger Clinton was in was a row over whether he got a blow-job from an intern? Anyway, some rebuttals:

      1) Why do you think that cutting military funding is intrinsically "un-American"? America spends vastly more per capita on the military than any other nation on Earth. Cutting that back a bit (like to where the US is only spending 2 or 3 times as much as anyone else) would seem like sound fiscal policy to me. At any rate, regardless of whether you agree with the policy, it's somewhat far-fetched to regard it as "un-American".

      2) There were definitely blunders in the handling of the Bosnian-Serb conflict, although I think it's a stretch to describe them as war-criminal (the indictements notwithstanding), and I don't think there was any gross misleading of the public.

      3) Relaxing export restrictions could again be seen as sane policy. After all, the US has an appalling current-account deficit, so it might be a good idea to start exporting some stuff. It's not like the Chinese couldn't have got computers from other places instead. In any event, regardless of whether you agree with the policy, it hardly qualifies as "un-American". (Indeed, isn't free trade an American value?). You can also hardly blame Clinton for spys at Los Alamos - that's a failure of execution, not a failure of policy. (Contrast with Bush, who was given the intelligence data that the evidence was shaky, but chose to go ahead with a policy of misleading the public.)

      4) And Bush was funded by the US oil industry, who had most to gain from an Iraqi invasion. In effect, Bush was bribed by private enterprise to go to war.

      5) I don't know enough about that to comment

      6) Yup, that was pretty shameful. No argument there. However, it's still not, in my opinion, on the same order of magnitude as taking the country to war on a false pretext.

      7) Again, I don't know enough about that to comment.

    15. Re:Nervous Senators? by tc · · Score: 1
      Well, there's all this stuff seeping out now about how the intelligence data was pretty shaky in the first place. It's hitting the media much more in Britain than in the US (judging by the BBC website, at any rate). I don't think it's much of a stretch to think that the advice was "Well, Mr. President, we have some sketchy circumstantial stuff, but we don't know for sure that he doesn't have any WMD." Bush made the call that he was going to go to war anyway, and instead of just telling it straight, he made out that the evidence was highly compelling.

      The whole thing really did have a feel that Bush wanted to go to war, he had a timetable, and he was going to stick to it regardless of what the evidence was or wasn't, what the Iraqis did or didn't do, or what any of America's allies happened to think of it. That's not really responsible leadership.

    16. Re:Nervous Senators? by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      In 1996, China had no high-end computers capable of testing nuclear weapons. By 1999, they had 350.

      Really? In 1996 China didn't have the computer power available to the US (and most of the rest of the world) in 1941?

      I might be wrong, but I suspect that *I* have computer power comparible to what the US gov't used in 1941 to test nukes... ?

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    17. Re:Nervous Senators? by khallow · · Score: 1
      Isn't there a saying that goes, don't attribute to malice that which can easily be explained by stupidity (this is GW Bush after all). Just because they're wrong, doesn't mean they lied.

      And what form does the stupidity take? It's better to explain this as self-interest and group-interest. Stupidity is a factor, but it's driven by some sort of self/group-interest. After all, people don't kill them selves with vending machines for the good of the world.

      I still don't see why people with brain that must work since they know how to write, insist that Bush is an idiot. I think that GW Bush did some work to get where he is. He isn't just wisking along on his daddy's coattails. OTOH, if it makes you feel uncomfortable, then I'll drop the subject.

    18. Re:Nervous Senators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bill Clinton used the same forged documents to justify a strike on Iraq and Sudan? Man they are getting a lot of use out of them. I never understood why behavior by members of the democratic party would mitigate actions by members of the republican party and vice versa. Party membership must be valuable.

    19. Re:Nervous Senators? by gmajor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bill Clinton used faulty intelligence, in the same way GWB used faulty intelligence. These documents were not forged by Americans (as far as we can tell), and the Brits refuse to tell where they got it from (even to the Americans), except to say it came from a third party country.

    20. Re:Nervous Senators? by The+Mayor · · Score: 1

      Look, I would gladly agree that the US is spending too much on the military. But you seem to be exagerating when you state "America spends vastly more per capita on the military on Earth". Here is the obligatory link. You can see that the US per capita defense budget in 2001 was approximately $950 (adjusted for inflation to 1995 terms). France's budget was about $775 per person. Norway's was over $800 per person (Norway!?!). Yep, the US spends more per capita. But not "vastly more". Certainly far less than 2 or 3 times as anyone else.

      I think a better method of comparison is to look at defense spending as a percentage of GDP. Here is another page that demonstrates this. The US spends about 3% of its GDP on defense. This is lower than Greece and Turkey by a wide margin. In fact, it is less than half the percentage China spends.

      I'm not trying to justify what the US spends on its military. But I think it distorts the figures when one looks at US military spending without considering the size of the US economy or the per capita wealth enjoyed in the US. The US still does spend more per capita than Europe. But, then again, Europe had to call on the US to help them solve the Yugoslavia situation. With the relative ineffectiveness of European military spending, one could argue just as easily that Europe should increase its military spending (again, not my argument....but I don't like to hear statistics get twisted, and I thought this deserved a response).

      --
      --Be human.
    21. Re:Nervous Senators? by cunta_cinte · · Score: 1

      From http://www.andrewsullivan.com/index.php?dish_inc=a rchives/2003_07_06_dish_archive.html

      BAGHDAD BROADCASTING CORPORATION :

      "UK Parliament Clears Govt of Misleading on Iraq" - Reuters/Washington Post.

      "Campbell cleared by MPs over Iraq dossier" - Daily Telegraph.

      "Dossier report clears Campbell" - The Guardian.

      "Iraq weapons claims criticised" - BBC headline today.

    22. Re:Nervous Senators? by statusbar · · Score: 1

      The timetable was to take full control of Iraq before June 2nd, 2003. If Saddam were still in power on June 2nd, the oil embargo would have been lifted by the UN and Saddam would be very busy selling oil for EUROS.

      I heard an argument that it wouldn't have mattered who the president of the united states was... The war with iraq was an economic necessity.

      but what do I know besides c++ programming....

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
  14. It's not dying, by canadiangoose · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's just going underground. The funding will not be cut off, it will come from quieter sources. They made a mistake by making the public so aware of the project in the first place. Americans don't want to be spyed on by their own government. Doesn't mean the government can't spy on them, it simply means they can't spy on them openly. Nothing has changed, TIA will continue. I'm living happily in Canada, thank God.

    --
    Never eat more than you can lift -- Miss Piggy
    1. Re:It's not dying, by Rahga · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Doesn't mean the government can't spy on them, it simply means they can't spy on them openly. Nothing has changed, TIA will continue. I'm living happily in Canada, thank God."

      I agree 100%. Down here in America, individuals have to pay good, hard money to treat mental illnesses like paranoia. At least Canada has those glorious socialized medicine programs.

    2. Re:It's not dying, by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      they also teach history up there!

      paranoi: it's for the educated.

      --

      -pyrrho

  15. heh by D0wnsp0ut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    <sarcasm>What a shame. I was looking forward to having an identity chip embedded into my skin to act as my credit card, driver's license, official government identity, travel pass, etc.</sarcasm>

    The more I watch "The Running Man" the more I realize how close we are to living in that kind of society.

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither!"
    1. Re:heh by pmz · · Score: 1

      The more I watch "The Running Man" the more I realize how close we are to living in that kind of society.

      Funny, just the other day, I realized that The Running Man is prophetic. For example, what is the natural conclution of "reality TV"? Pitting America's worst convicts against eachother in a cage match. It's merely the task of combining Real TV, America's Funniest Home Videos, and Ultimate Fighting all under a Britney Spears Pepsi marketing campaign.

      Sick? Yes. Suprising? No.

    2. Re:heh by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      From the Liberty City Survivor commercial in Grand Theft Auto III:

      Male Voice: "Tonight...the TV event that will make history...Liberty City Survivor! This takes reality TV to a whole new level! We'll take 20 recently paroled guys, equip them with grenade launchers and flamethrowers...and let them hunt each other down!! It's the reality show where you...just might be...part of the action!!"

      Man: "I was grabbing a sandwich in the Happy Blimp, and all-of-a-sudden these guys crashed through the window and started shooting at each other! I was so excited, I didn't even notice I'd been hit! After that, I was hooked on Liberty City Survivor! I watch it every day in the hospital!"

      Male Voice: "The game doesn't end until there's only one man left standing!! Tune in nightly, or watch the 24hour live webcast!......Liberty City Survivor!!......Natural selection...has come home!!......."

      (courtesy of John Mazzocchi's Commercial Scripts FAQ on gamefaqs.com

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
  16. John Ashcroft by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has he had a single good idea?

    No seriously, the blurb says this is his second massive failure. What has he succeeded in? (other than the Patriot Act)

    --
    [o]_O
    1. Re:John Ashcroft by (startx) · · Score: 4, Funny

      Absolutely nothing. Why do you think he was free to be appointed to the position in the first place? We (the citizens of Missouri) elected a dead man, rather than give Ashcroft another term in the Senate.

    2. Re:John Ashcroft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and this is why he such a pissed off individual. you pushed him over the edge.

    3. Re:John Ashcroft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He succeeded in covering up a statue in the Grand Hall of the DOJ building--it has an exposed breast! story

    4. Re:John Ashcroft by glsunder · · Score: 1

      So will that be the new threat of bad senators? "Elect me again, or I'll terrorize the entire country?"

    5. Re:John Ashcroft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. You (the dumbasses who voted for a dead guy) felt sorry for a woman who's husband died, so you decided to make her a US Senator, despite that she had ZERO experience and was in no way capable of fulfilling the duties a Senator should be doing.

    6. Re:John Ashcroft by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      No. You (the dumbasses who voted for a dead guy) felt sorry for a woman who's husband died, so you decided to make her a US Senator, despite that she had ZERO experience and was in no way capable of fulfilling the duties a Senator should be doing.


      Or maybe they just figured that anyone would be better than Ashcroft. Heck, I'd vote for Krusty the Clown over him...

  17. Dead or just hibernating? by PostConsumerRecycled · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I am glad to hear that it will be effectively dead for this budget year, but what happens next year? Is the program still on the books just awaiting funding to spring up on us.

    I'm not really sure how the entire process works, but I wont really feel confident that TIA is dead until it is officially killed, as opposed to simply not funded.

    --

    There is no dark side of the moon really, matter of fact it's all dark
  18. Re:I WISH!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHA wow that is so funny! No really! You know you could even substitute the names of other US officials with Ashcroft and it would still be funny!

    You know, I just thought about it, I don't remember any US presidency that was hated so much that it was an overt and continuous topic of the media.

  19. Minty by August_zero · · Score: 1

    Nice to know that congress can get something right. Still a good sign that maybe some heads on capital hill are leveling out a bit and thinking about the long-term effects of enacting liberty-squelching legislation.

    I could just be overly optimistic though.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  20. The TIA subjected to Slashdot mods by Qinopio · · Score: 3, Funny

    the Terrorism Information Awareness program, which would troll Americans' personal records

    (this government has been rated -1, Troll)
    --
    __________
    [Big Brick Wall]
  21. This won't kill Total Information Awareness... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    This won't kill Total Information Awareness. After all, information wants to be free!!!

  22. There was much rejoicing ... by zangdesign · · Score: 1

    Yay! And there was rejoicing throughout the land!

    And then they ate the politicians.

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  23. Looks like 1984... by robogun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... has been put off for a little while. But it will come. Sorry, guys, but that's just the nature of information tech. The gov't is not needed for this.

    Once info is collected, it can be collected, archived, sold under the table or social-engineered out of you or your bank's representative.

    Then, it is simple a matter of storage. Even now, the credit records of all consumers in the United States can be fit onto a single hard disk (assume a 200mb disk, 200 million consumers, and 1000 bytes per record).

    Not much can be done about that, except a Butlerian Jihad.

    1. Re:Looks like 1984... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      200 million consumers, and 1000 bytes per record
      1kb should be enough for anybody...

    2. Re:Looks like 1984... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think your credit rating is 1k. Ha! Ha!

    3. Re:Looks like 1984... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But...didn't the Butlerian Jihad lead (eventually) to Total Information Awareness?

    4. Re:Looks like 1984... by pmz · · Score: 1

      Even now, the credit records of all consumers in the United States can be fit onto a single hard disk (assume a 200mb disk, 200 million consumers, and 1000 bytes per record).

      Then why would TIA require 169 million dollars a year, if a five-year-old Sun Enterprise 450 and an Oracle license would be more than enough for the task?

    5. Re:Looks like 1984... by robogun · · Score: 1

      True... TIA would have been in the billions when the cost overruns were added in. But remember you're talking about the gov't here. When was the last time a gov't project was cheap? Or done on time? Remember the oracle fiasco in Calif? Know what is going on in Calif? You don't even want this discussion to go in that direction.

  24. yes but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what happens when the program is officially canceled but then still comes to life due to outside funding? is casey rybak available to thwart the terroristic plans of some goof on a train controlling the TIA system with a really small portable satellite dish?

  25. interesting by SubtleNuance · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interesting that "Funding for TIA All But Dead" is the tag on a $169 MILLION budget. Really, I'd say that $400 was the long shot, and the $169 was the "awww shucks, i guess we'll be real thrifty and carefull with this new project and only spend $170 Million". The TIA project is sadly offensive in a USA where the whole shebang is getting budgeted on BORROWED money. Either people have to sit up and decide to pay their taxes for this jibberish or they need to ease up on the Orwellian Nightmare Funding Project... aka TIA.

    Maybe they can put this TIA thing back a year and do something about the crumbling inner-city-Detroit, or poor without food/healthcare, or some-other-more-worthy-project.

    Really, even with that said, who really thinks that the DoD/CIA/NSA/FBI couldnt come up with the money (even in *addition* to what they spend now) to fund such a project. Dont think just because they are *reporting* to be less serious about it; "hey look - were cutting its funding - its not a priority (since you were so offended..)", this Stasi-Like crap is only gonna get more severe as your country slips into a deeper self-induced paranoia/schitzophrenia... and Bush is driving the bus.

    1. Re:interesting by Politburo · · Score: 4, Informative

      who really thinks that the DoD/CIA/NSA/FBI couldnt come up with the money

      That's just it. For the most part, they can't do things like this because spending is allocated by Congress. Money isn't just thrown out as "400$ million for FBI" and that's it. The expenditures are broken down, and aside from some DoD/Military spending, mostly public. Note that Congress still maintains oversight of this spending, it is just not public, for security reasons. This is how many leaks about the F-117 and B-2 projects came out; through Congressional offices that had oversight on the project.

      The Federal Budget is a law passed by Congress every year. Agencies cannot just reallocate the money as they see fit. This "Power of the Purse" is probably the greatest power that the Congress currently has. It has used this power to enact a national drinking age, by witholding highway funds to states that don't comply. I believe it was also used recently against states with medicinal marijuana laws, but could not find an article confirming this.

      The people suggesting that this program will just "reappear" are misguided, not "insightful". No agency would attempt to piss off Congress like that. The TIA is dead for FY2004, assuming the bill passes unmodified. Whether it stays dead will remain to be seen.

    2. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the "Power of the Purse" doesn't control money the CIA raises that is outside of its budget. Remember the Iran-Contra affair? Yes, the money that went to fund the Contras was raised "off the books" by selling arms and supplies to the Iranians. Let's see....who was involved in that? Secord, Poindexter, and to a lesser extent Armitage. In case you weren't aware, these were all of Papa Bush's cronies at the CIA when Bush was head of the CIA (along with Cheney, as I understand it). Now, Poindexter is named to head the TIA, Armitage is Assistant Secretary of Defense, Cheney is VP, and Secord was the fall guy.

      History does have a habit of repeating itself. Or, more explicitly, old dogs have a hard time learnign new tricks. The current administration is full of people that were involved with Iran-Contra.

      I'm not suggesting we restore funding to TIA...I'm merely suggesting that is may be naive to think that "off the books" financing doesn't occur in Washington.

    3. Re:interesting by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Maybe they can put this TIA thing back a year and do something about the crumbling inner-city-Detroit, or poor without food/healthcare, or some-other-more-worthy-project.

      Heck, even doing _nothing_ would be better. But they just can't do nothing, gotta be "fixing" things, spending other folks' money (that's so easy to do, all the while painting yourself as a true humanitarian!). In the end, there are two options: repudiate the debt (we're sunk) or inflate the currency (we're sunk). Either way, we're sunk. Because they're never going pay off that debt (how many gazillions is it now?).

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:interesting by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
      I am not the author of this post, but it should be modded up. I don't have any mod points so I'm reposting it.

      Of course, the "Power of the Purse" doesn't control money the CIA raises that is outside of its budget. Remember the Iran-Contra affair? Yes, the money that went to fund the Contras was raised "off the books" by selling arms and supplies to the Iranians. Let's see....who was involved in that? Secord, Poindexter, and to a lesser extent Armitage. In case you weren't aware, these were all of Papa Bush's cronies at the CIA when Bush was head of the CIA (along with Cheney, as I understand it). Now, Poindexter is named to head the TIA, Armitage is Assistant Secretary of Defense, Cheney is VP, and Secord was the fall guy.

      History does have a habit of repeating itself. Or, more explicitly, old dogs have a hard time learnign new tricks. The current administration is full of people that were involved with Iran-Contra.

      I'm not suggesting we restore funding to TIA...I'm merely suggesting that is may be naive to think that "off the books" financing doesn't occur in Washington.

      --
      Debunking the "59 Deceits"
    5. Re:interesting by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I didn't reply to this post when it was AC, but will now.

      The example sounds great on its face, but ignores a major factor of Iran-Contra. President Reagan and Vice-President Bush narrowly escaped the affair unscathed. Iran-Contra wasn't something that people looked at and said "oh well." They were pissed! If you recall, there were televised hearings on the matters (Tower Commission).

      Just as some of us may be naieve to believe there is no "off the books" spending (I did not mean to imply that I believe that), some of us are too paranoid to believe that the government learned its lesson the last time it tried something crazy, illegal and stupid for a little funding. Remember, North and Poindexter were indicted, and Poindexter was convicted on charges, but did not serve any time.

      In short: The last time the Executive branch attempted to end-around Congress, Congress bitch-slapped them back. Saying that something like this "could happen again" is like saying "Hey, maybe this year Bush will break into the DNC headquarters, it happened before!" It won't happen again.

    6. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd buy the $billion dollar budget if we were talking about people that don't know how to manouever around a cmd prompt, would land Oracle the contract and run Microsoft products on the front end, but let's face it.

      Open Source is cheap, and talent is easy to find^H^H^H^Hgrow.

      Automation costs alone will be cut if they do it right, 160 million sounds about right to me.

  26. Re:I WISH!! by dynamo · · Score: 1

    1. It really wasn't intended as a troll. I was sincere.
    2. He has effectively repealed most of those archaic 'rights' for all of us, that should apply to him as well.
    3. Dammit, you're right.

  27. How is this offtopic? It's funny, nimrod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I didn't even write it. Mod it up--it's good humor, although not laugh-out-loud hilarious.

    1. Re:How is this offtopic? It's funny, nimrod by Thud457 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I found this buried in the bill on pp 4583, p 2, l4 of the Congressional Pecord:

      "342a) Development of a sophisticated AI codenamed "SKYNET" to get first post on www.slashdot.org on every story posted ----- $250,000"






      (Am I lying or am I not?)

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  28. The TIA is dead, Long live the TIA by Rares+Marian · · Score: 4, Funny

    It will be funded under plan B. The one where they remember to put the clause, "It's for the children."

    --
    The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    1. Re:The TIA is dead, Long live the TIA by Sanction · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe I'm just paranoid, but I'm starting to think "the children" are the greatest threat these days...

      --
      Well I'm the doctor and I say you're dead, so shut up and take it like a man!
    2. Re:The TIA is dead, Long live the TIA by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

      The 1984^H^H^H^H2004 Orwellian TIA Act... you know... for kids!

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  29. Re:The following is my sentiment. It is not a trol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are sooo busted.

  30. OF COURSE! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yes, this is true. No money "on the books." A perfect "end".

    But do you really think TIA will really end? The project will simply go, as they call it, "Dark". When the F-117 was being made, in a project called, I believe, "Deep Blue" do you think money that was on the books was used? No. TIA will "die" in the public, because the project is going dark. End of story. The website will remain the scrappy little inocent bits of HTML it is today, meanwhile under a lake somewhere will be a cluster of computers that are running TIA at full speed.

    1. Re:OF COURSE! by Shackleford · · Score: 1
      "But do you really think TIA will really end? The project will simply go, as they call it, "Dark". When the F-117 was being made, in a project called, I believe, "Deep Blue" do you think money that was on the books was used? No. TIA will "die" in the public, because the project is going dark. End of story."

      This reminds me of something known as the Aurora project that I heard about. It was a secret project that was mistakenly included in a budget statement that was not supposed to include such projects. Maybe TIA is becoming one of those projects.

      But even if it doesn't, you have to remember that when something like this is defeated it'll probably come back in a different form. And you can just think of its second coming as a second name change for TIA.

      And what implications will this have for the GIA (Governernment Information Awareness) site? Just wondering.

    2. Re:OF COURSE! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      That's not how it works.

      A black budget in the sense of Have Blue (stealth aircraft development) has a line-item of a code name. Members of the Senate and House who are in on the important budgets know about the programs, go see the aircraft. For example aviation magazines mentioned that Senate Select for Defense went to California and saw B-2 as early as 1983 and '85.

      Secret programs kept from the Senate would be under discressional spending which is harder to track and harder to procure.

    3. Re:OF COURSE! by Obyron · · Score: 1

      ..."Deep Blue"...

      It was "Have Blue," just for the record.

      --
      --Obyron
    4. Re:OF COURSE! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
      Thanks. Deep Blue is chess, isn't it? I need to go outside for a walk I think :)

    5. Re:OF COURSE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Deep Blue is chess, isn't it?

      Yep. It's the computer developed by IBM that became the world's chess champion.

    6. Re:OF COURSE! by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Secret programs kept from the Senate would be under discressional spending which is harder to track and harder to procure.

      This is where you use all that info gathered under the TIA prototype to blackmail these purseholders. Yup, that's how Congress is worked.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    7. Re:OF COURSE! by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > A black budget in the sense of Have Blue (stealth aircraft development) has a line-item of a code name. Members of the Senate and House who are in on the important budgets know about the programs, go see the aircraft. For example aviation magazines mentioned that Senate Select for Defense went to California and saw B-2 as early as 1983 and '85.

      And yet - within 10 years, Have Blue was made public, and now you can even google for images of the prototype aircraft, released by the folks who built it. (Pretty farking neat design, I might add. Many of its elements can be seen in present-day UAVs whose existence has also been made public.)

      I would argue the same for TIA. TIA was renamed once ("Total" to "Terrorism" Information Awareness). It will be renamed again, only this time it will be made dark. Off-book funding for it will continue, and something equivalent to TIA will be implemented.

      And 10+ years from now, TIA-thrice-renamed will be declassified, we'll all look back - just as we do at Have Blue today - and say "Hey, pretty neat. The idea actually worked. And once again, we were panicking over nothing."

    8. Re:OF COURSE! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I'm unsure of the use for TIA and I'm unsure of how bad it would be and unsure of what good they will get.

      Totally off topic, what would /. in the 1980s have been like?

      What would the comments to stories about F-117 or B-2 or GPS have been like?

      Apple releases IIsi - 20 MHz and a 20 MB SCSI drive for under $7,000!

    9. Re:OF COURSE! by Komodo · · Score: 1

      Not to sound like too much of a tinfoil hat, but this may have already happened. I suspect that the people who would like to push this kind of technology aren't going to wait for it to be legal and accepted by the public (even as imprecisely represented by our elected officials).

      If that's the case, the best that TIA could have done was make a lot of black-hole surveillance projects legit.

    10. Re:OF COURSE! by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I'm unsure of the use for TIA and I'm unsure of how bad it would be and unsure of what good they will get.
      >
      >Totally off topic, what would /. in the 1980s have been like?
      > What would the comments to stories about F-117 or B-2 or GPS have been like?

      Probably "I'm unsure of the use for the F-117 and I'm unsure of how bad it'll be and unsure of what good they'll get."

      Who needs a subsonic one-missile attack aircraft (F-117) and a multibillion dollar subsonic strategic bomber (B-2) when you can send out a bunch of B-1s, (supersonic, no less!), over the North Pole? Bomb the Russkies and be back for lunch! Canadians would be protesting "Stealth Cruise Missile Testing" too!

      As for what good TIA will do, I don't know either. (Nor do I have a need to know).

      Based on historical precedent, however - and I say this as a guy who's traditionally highly skeptical of most government initiatives - I'm willing to bet that within our lifetimes, (in much the same way that ane civilian on the planet can now read the VENONA transcripts and intercepts, and corroborate the evidence with data declassified from the KGB's archives) we'll eventually learn that our spy d00dz of the years 2003-2010 were more on the ball than we ever gave them credit for at the time.

    11. Re:OF COURSE! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      TIA will "die" in the public, because the project is going dark. End of story. The website will remain the scrappy little inocent bits of HTML it is today, meanwhile under a lake somewhere will be a cluster of computers that are running TIA at full speed.

      This is what many would call a "conspiracy theory".

      Is there any language Congress COULD have put in the budget that would have convinced you that the TIA program truly was over and done with? Think about what your answer to this question signifies.

    12. Re:OF COURSE! by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      Anyone familiar with the military knows it develops things in phases: i.e., "strawman, stoneman, and ironman".

      TIA was just the "strawman" phase.

      Just like the space shuttle Enterprise was never intended for spaceflight, TIA was never intended to accomplish its publicly-announced goals. It's actual purpose is to 1) Bring the subject into public awareness, 2) Gauge public reaction to the program, and 3) Analyze and identify technical, process, and social issues that represent barriers to implementation.

      TIA itself no longer needs funding as other (not publicly associated with TIA) departments are responsible for analyzing the various results and preparing for the next phase.

      In short, you were expected not to like it. The plan is to determine how to accomplish specific objectives irrespective of public opinion -- which ICANN and RIAA/MPAA have demonstrated can be done.

      I'd expect successive phases in 2005 and 2007.

  31. If only this concept scaled better..... by Rahga · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember something Ted Kennedy said a while back in committee, about "obsolete" ideas in the constitution about indivudals witholding taxes so that stuff like the Army couldn't operate without funding. Quote, "That stuff will never happen here in America". IMHO, he's not ultimately correct about this point, but the motivation in making it is pretty strong.

    I really can't go any further without trolling like 95% of these other posts are. I'm kinda really sick about political stories in /., aren't you?

  32. No more TIA, but how about some TEA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Wired has an article saying that the Terrorism Information Awareness program, which would troll Americans' personal records to find terrorists before they strike"

    The word you seek is trawl. Now that TIA is dead, the thing America needs is a Total English Awareness program.

    1. Re:No more TIA, but how about some TEA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll works too! As in "trolling for bites," actually the definition applied to USENET misanthropes!

      it would be ironic if this post was a troll, too...

  33. What's with /. pessemism? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    A few DMCA bills proposed in Europe, and everyone thinks they'll all pass. This gets killed and everyone thinks it'll still go through. Look, logic will win. There will be no IP in the future--and there's nothing you can do to stop that!

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  34. How is this offtopic? (nt) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no text

  35. Perhaps ... by DogIsMyCoprocessor · · Score: 3, Funny

    a better choice of words than "troll" would be "attempt to data mine". From "troll" I get a picture of the government anonymously inflaming me by mocking my spending habits.

    --

    "And this is my boy, Sherman. Speak, Sherman." "Hello." "Good boy."

    1. Re:Perhaps ... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      From "troll" I get a picture of the government anonymously inflaming me by mocking my spending habits.

      Sorta like trying to claim odd expenses on your taxes and getting laughed at by your accountant (or worst, auditor :) ... though one time I did manage to claim my Voodoo 2 video card as a work expense

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:Perhaps ... by panda · · Score: 1

      Actually, "trolling" in this case refers to a method of fishing, and not trolling in an online forum. Though I've always linked the two in my mind as an online troll is leaving carefully baited hooks (his vituperative messages) and waiting to see who bites.

      --
      Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
    3. Re:Perhaps ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, the word is trawling.

    4. Re:Perhaps ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=trolling
      "
      troll1 ( P ) Pronunciation Key (trl)
      v. trolled, trolling, trolls
      v. tr.

      To fish for by trailing a baited line from behind a slowly moving boat.
      To fish in by trailing a baited line: troll the lake for bass.
      To trail (a baited line) in fishing.
      Slang. To patrol (an area) in search for someone or something: " [Criminals] troll bus stations for young runaways" (Pete Axthelm).
      Music.
      To sing in succession the parts of (a round, for example).
      To sing heartily: troll a carol.
      To roll or revolve.

      v. intr.
      To fish by trailing a line, as from a moving boat.

      To wander about; ramble.
      Slang. To patrol an area in search for someone or something.
      Music. To sing heartily or gaily.
      To roll or spin around.

      n.

      The act of trolling for fish.
      A lure, such as a spoon or spinner, that is used for trolling.
      Music. A vocal composition in successive parts; a round.
      "

      Now, STFU.

    5. Re:Perhaps ... by panda · · Score: 1

      While trawling is a method of fishing very similar if not identical to trolling, trolling is still a method of fishing.

      According to dictionary.com:

      The verb troll has the following definitions:

      To fish for by trailing a baited line from behind a slowly moving boat.
      To fish in by trailing a baited line: troll the lake for bass.
      To trail (a baited line) in fishing.
      Slang. To patrol (an area) in search for someone or something: " [Criminals] troll bus stations for young runaways" (Pete Axthelm).
      Music.
      To sing in succession the parts of (a round, for example).
      To sing heartily: troll a carol.
      To roll or revolve.

      You need to get more, AC.

      --
      Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
    6. Re:Perhaps ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to dictionary.com:

      And if you saw it on the Internet, it must be true!

    7. Re:Perhaps ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're saying they're more like an anonymous coward?

    8. Re:Perhaps ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded up as funny?

      I get shit loads of SPAM, every day, telling me how to reduce my debt, how to get an unsecured visa, do this and that with my mortage, and how to get laid more often.

      Then I see the members of the republican party (including El Presidente himself -- well, his campaign people) sending out SPAM to potential voters.

      I dunno about you, but it makes me wonder.

  36. Citizens aren't terrorists. by Muttonhead · · Score: 1
    American citizens are not the terrorists anyway.

    Citizens would only become a threat to the government if the government was deemed fraudulent, as in voter fraud or if the government was behind the 9/11 attacks or if elements of the government were trying to bring about a new world order.

    Please mod this down.

    1. Re:Citizens aren't terrorists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Oklahoma City bombing was not so long ago. As I recall, the culprits there were American citizens. Perhaps the government does need some form of protection against its own citizens.

      It would be wise to look back in time more than two years when examining the status of the country.

  37. Re:The following is my sentiment. It is not a trol by PD · · Score: 1, Funny

    insert into activity_tracking_table
    (party_flag, date, nick)
    values
    (true, '7-14-2003', 'Schezar');

    They are watching you.

  38. How much damage? by cspenn · · Score: 1

    Yes - but -

    How much damage can they still do with $169M?

    Last I checked, Red Hat Advanced wasn't more than a couple of hundred dollars. Throw in PostgreSQL and Apache SSL, and you have a basic system to throw data into.

    It would be a vicious, ugly irony if the budget cut resulted in Department of Homeland Security resorting to exclusive use of Open Source to accomplish their goals, don't you think?

  39. probably obsolete already anyway... by Connie_Lingus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Come on, now, how hard is most of the information that was supposed to be mined for TIA that hard to get anyway?? For $35US you can look in the yellow pages (or, of course, log into a web site), punch in some data, and get a background check of anyone anyway. This includes

    1. Credit statements
    2. Job histories
    3. Criminal records.
    4. Tax records. ...and so on. Corporations wanting to know everything about employees have already created the tools to mine our personal information anyway...do you really thing the gov't can't?

    Just because the funding is gone, do you really thing the gov't has given up on this? Bad press killed this "initiative" long before this Congress did...but don't worry, they have wizened up. Next time they just won't mention to us that they are doing it...

    --
    never bring a twinkie to a food fight.
  40. BILL OF RIGHTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    since most americans dont even know the bill of rights here it is. amendment IV is the relevant one here.

    Amendment I

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

    Amendment II

    A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

    Amendment III

    No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

    Amendment IV

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


    Amendment V

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Amendment VI

    In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

    Amendment VII

    In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

    Amendment VIII

    Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

    Amendment IX

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

    Amendment X

    The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

    1. Re:BILL OF RIGHTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is for physical searches, you dumb shit!

  41. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great! Now all the terrorists will be sitting at home eating pie and drinking juice and nobody will have the guts to say the words "aaggle baaggle faggle" three hundred times real quickly backwards while singing the national anthem of Bleveskovolokia and eating three and a half dozen tainted chic peas.

  42. Feel NOTHING for Ashcroft by ouzel · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This man is a religious zealot, who has tried in a number of ways to (1) inject his religious extremism into government, and (2) expand his snooping powers by any means necessary (example: TIA). Any number of links would have sufficed, but you get the point.

    I feel nothing for Ashcroft, except maybe hatred.

    1. Re:Feel NOTHING for Ashcroft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and don't foget, when he ran for the senate, he LOST to a dead guy.

  43. Dear Congressman Stevens: by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    TIA (Thanks in advance).

  44. You == "The Man" by Schezar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow..

    I didn't think -anyone- could reply to that in an interesting, intelligent, or funny way.

    You rock.

    --
    GeekNights!
    Late Night Radio for Geeks!
    1. Re:You == "The Man" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "party, 7-14-2003"

      714, geddit?

      Whoo, that's some good humor there!

    2. Re:You == "The Man" by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > 714, geddit?

      Wow, as for humor, that's a stretch, but good timing (dating?) on the article posting.

  45. Drat! by suso · · Score: 1

    No more $900 cups of coffee..

  46. Submission text by Cancel · · Score: 1

    Nearly all of the text of the submission is copied directly from the Wired article. How about some attribution, or at least some of those little 66 99 things?

  47. John Poindexter does his own funding by babykong · · Score: 5, Interesting

    TIA is run by John Poindexter who was involved in Iran Contra. Iran Contra was a method of bypassing the need to use congressional funding for the Contras by selling arms to Iran and using those funds to do the Job.

    These people can generate their own funds, possibly by selling some of the valuable information they collect to various marketing organizations. With the death of investigative reporting, who is going to catch them this time?

    --
    Question Reality
    1. Re:John Poindexter does his own funding by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      These people can generate their own funds, possibly by selling some of the valuable information they collect to various marketing organizations. With the death of investigative reporting, who is going to catch them this time?

      Fark or the Drudge report I suppose, followed by Slashdot (Twice). I think the informant will pick a codename similar to the 70s era "Deep Throat". Try to find Deep Throat on the internet. The first 400000 links are porn. I suspect he/she will be "Penis Enlargement." Indeed, they are sending coded messages to everyone in America.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:John Poindexter does his own funding by stanwirth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yah. True. And if you read The Tower Report on Iran Contra, you'd know that it was the IBM mainframe that caught them out in the end, not investigative journalists.

      Basically they were hoisted by their own petard (but apparently not dropped hard enough afterwards). They had an early email system that (wow!) kept backups of everything, including things that they'd thought they'd deleted. So what was so incriminating? The email discussion between JP and other White House Staff concerning how various lies might go over with the public regarding the Iran Contra scandal as it unfolded -- how the story might be changed, how they might spin various half- truths.

      The devil is in the details: you can't read the Tower Report without reading the footnotes, because this is where the real story is: how they were undone by their own words, when they thought everything they wrote could be deleted and or otherwise kept secret.

      TIA profiling comes a little bit too close to Minority Report's FutureCrime and 1984's ThoughtCrime for comfort.

  48. I think I can fill in this blank. by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Wired has an article saying that the Terrorism Information Awareness program, which would troll Americans' personal records to find terrorists before they strike, may soon face the same fate Congress meted out to John Ashcroft in his attempt to create a corps of volunteer domestic spies:" Im pretty sure the end of this reads Moderation, since they even say they are trolling.

  49. Dear Congress... by istartedi · · Score: 1

    ...could you make sure there is no TIA? TIA.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Dear Congress... by iendedi · · Score: 1

      ...could you make sure there is no TIA? TIA.

      I'm sure that is exactly what happened, simultaneously, from millions of mouths...

      That is the wonder of democracy...

      --

      It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
  50. Imagine... by Schezar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You made me think...

    Imagine (HYPOTHETICALLY!) if the the US Government actually -had- orchestrated 9/11 (or knew about it and allowed it to happen) as part of a larger scheme.

    Now imagine if the public at large found out. If there were undeniable proof.

    What would happen? How would middle-class America react? That would be the ultimate test of the unity of the American people. Would they actually -do- something about it? Or would the spin-doctors win?

    If only there were a World-Sim(tm) I could use to watch something like that unfold.

    --
    GeekNights!
    Late Night Radio for Geeks!
    1. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Civil War for a few years. Of course since all the troops are deployed overseas the public would be fighting against mercenaries hired to protect the government. I got my first taste of filtered communication in Gulf War I when all the letters I received were already opened, it was like I was a prisoner of the US Govt.

      There are enough veterans in the US who would fight if such a scenario played out.

      ok, time to go anon

    2. Re:Imagine... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      What would happen? How would middle-class America react? That would be the ultimate test of the unity of the American people. Would they actually -do- something about it? Or would the spin-doctors win?

      I have no faith in the proles, they're just worried about their bread and circuses. Half the elite is insanely organized and motivated to enslave the rest of us. The other half of the elite has a life (families, jobs, friends) and feels embattled and on the defensive when reading the seemingly-relentless march of Big Brother.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:Imagine... by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      or knew about it and allowed it to happen

      There were some rumors about this that floated around a couple of months after 9/11 that were pretty much ignored and forgotten about, perhaps because they didn't have much substance, or perhaps because the American public is as blase as we think it is. However:

      if the the US Government actually -had- orchestrated 9/11 ... If there were undeniable proof

      Are you kidding me? There would be a bigger shitstorm than you've ever seen. The American public still cares more about 9/11 than you would imagine. I'm sure there at least a couple thousand firefighters here in NYC who would be willing to go down to the District of Columbia to start a little firestarting...

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    4. Re:Imagine... by jvj24601 · · Score: 1

      What would happen? How would middle-class America react?

      Hmm. I don't hold too strong an opinion of the collective decisions of the American people. I would hope they would recall how our founding fathers acted, but I would probably guess that we'd be more like sheep about the whole thing. Sad, really.

    5. Re:Imagine... by Maserati · · Score: 1

      There'd be a Bush administration staffer hanging from every tree in Washinton, that's what'd happen.

      Bravely posting under my real nick.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    6. Re:Imagine... by Aadain2001 · · Score: 1

      That's really hard to predict. If you take the reaction of the American people right after 9-11, there was a lot of unity and flag waving and such. So the people have shown that we can band together around a common idea/action. But, on the other hand, most of the people in this country seem to be blindly following Bush, not for any concrete reasons, just because he's the president during 9-11 and he let America blow some countries up. If you take those reactions of the American people, I would say that most wouldn't believe the evidence, even if it was screamed into their face by all of Congress. But I now I remember that America loves America, and they'll hate/fight anything that they preceive as a threat to America as they know it. If evidence came out that BushCo really did know or even did it, then I would think there would be a revolution overnight.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    7. Re:Imagine... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      As much as I hate the current regime, there is nothing that leads me to that conclusion. Not even for a minute.

      That said, if evidence WERE found the undeniably placed the orchestration of the entire 9/11 attack at the feet of the White House, I believe congress would hold a little "Tribunal" action of its own.

      Article 1, Section 3 of the Constitution:

      ...

      The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments. When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath or affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two thirds of the members present.

      Judgment in cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit under the United States: but the party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to indictment, trial, judgment and punishment, according to law.

      Basically congress can throw them out of office. Once out of office, they can be tried for any related crimes.

      As far as the populice goes, you would see the same sort of reaction as happened during Nixon's downfall. Shock. Dogged following the events of the trial while it's going on. Grumblings afterward. Dinner party conversations for the next decade, and finally utterly forgetting what happened.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    8. Re:Imagine... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

      You made me think...

      Imagine (HYPOTHETICALLY!) if your genitals were covered in warts and open sores (or seemed to be because of the way "People" doctored the photos) as part of a larger scheme to make you unattractive.

      Now imagine if the public at large found out. If there were undeniable proof.

      What would happen? How would middle-class America react? That would be the ultimate test of the unity of the American people. Would they actually -do- something about it? Or would the spin-doctors win?

      Or would you die clutching your pristine dick?

      --
      668: Neighbour of the Beast
    9. Re:Imagine... by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      There is no such thing as "undeniable proof". Any such subversion is engineered either to provide an ultimate escape clause or is compartmentalized to prevent the logical associations necessary for "proof".

      Thus, there will be no "mass reaction" to any large-scale event because it was explicitly engineered to circumvent that possibility.

      A conclusion derived from the conspiracy theory you present is that from time to time, it is necessary to provide additional force to maintain "emotional/spiritual inertia", if you will. This inertia is directed in specific ways to accomplish specific objectives. You could view the Iraq wars, space shuttle disasters, OKC bombing, and 9/11 as examples of the expression intense emotional and spiritual energy necessary to sustain this inertia, but you'd be hard pressed to identify the specific objectives -- by design.

  51. I will mourn it deeply... by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 3, Funny

    .... but first I must go dance on it's grave.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  52. More work for the Break-the-Law department. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    What you say is very plausible. However, someone told me that, many years ago, when Congress made collecting some data illegal, the CIA moved the data collection to computers in Belgium. A government with a department that is allowed to break the law is an unlawful government.

    1. Re:More work for the Break-the-Law department. by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but how reliable is that "source"? Did they actually have any contacts inside the CIA that would allow them to know this kind of thing? Is there any proof of such an event in print? If not, then there's no basis for this and, like most urban legends, it's probably untrue.

    2. Re:More work for the Break-the-Law department. by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      I think the parent is referring to the "Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act" of 1978. I don't have any links to back up what he said, but over the years I've heard credible reports of foreign intel agencies supplying the CIA with info it would have been illegal for them to collect themselves.

      Believe what you want, but this is not an Urban Legend.

  53. Poorman's TIA by BelugaParty · · Score: 2, Funny

    TIA announced the 169 million dollar budget will pay for exactly one laptop and a year of minimum wage pay to an employee who will search for keywords on google.

  54. In the immortal words of the bard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "HA-HA!"

  55. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, thanks in advance (TIA) for doing something that may deny funding to TIA.

    Priceless.

    But does this mean there won't be as much funding to GIA?

  56. Re:Dear Professor Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The french are cheese-eating surrender monkeys.

    Ha ha!

  57. I dunno about you.. by Rinikusu · · Score: 2, Funny

    But has anyone considered selling Linux to those guys? Considering that most of the "information mining" they will be doing could be done more efficiently and faster by automating it, consider:
    Cheap, commodity x86 Beowulf clusters (see google)
    Free OS (consider a giant community to provide your organization with bug-fixes for your main OS and tools)
    OpenSource tools and OS (easier to modify for your own nefarious deeds)
    etc
    From my shoes, 169 million would buy one hell of a beowulf cluster, several admins, and a nice group of software developers to write and modify the programs needed. Not to mention that they could earmark parts of that money to fund grants for academically interesting projects that could help further the technology used by the TIA. Hell, Be, Inc survived on the equivalent of 50 million bucks for several years and they managed to crank out a really nice OS.

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:I dunno about you.. by pmz · · Score: 1

      From my shoes, 169 million would buy one hell of a beowulf cluster, several admins, and a nice group of software developers to write and modify the programs needed. Not to mention that they could earmark parts of that money to fund grants for academically interesting projects that could help further the technology used by the TIA.

      Nah, actually, 100 million is for Oracle licenses, 50 million is for "requirements meetings" that give managers an excuse to go to some interesting place, and the remaining 49 million will be for amazing offices with gourmet coffee machines with spare change going to a website mockup to show customers. In the end, no real work gets done, but that doesn't stop the project from getting 200M next year for looking so good.

    2. Re:I dunno about you.. by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      So. Are they hiring? ;)

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  58. about Congress by bersl2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The great thing about Congress is when they "understand" the issues in our favor. I'm so very glad they and their staffs are doing their homework.

    -0.5, Shades of Troll

    1. Re:about Congress by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I'll get modded as Troll, but the only thing Congress understands is its own pockets.

      Someone somewhere lined someone else's pocket. This is the only way this got defeated.

      I'm not holding my breath.

      I see this as a sign that something more nefarious is coming down the pipe.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  59. TIA means... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    True Idiocy in America

    1. Re:TIA means... by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      True Idiocy in America

      But you repeat yourself.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:TIA means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust, I, Anymore?

  60. TIA Awareness and funnelled funding. by bastion · · Score: 1

    Get real....

    The public opposition which TIA has invoked only means that the project is going "under the public radar." There are a variety of ways that TIA (or whatever it will be called next) can still get funding. The biggest issue IMHO is that the initiative has been pushed into a realm where watchdog groups can no longer monitor it. It would be easy for the project to get bits and pieces of funding from elsewhere like here. There is also decentralized funding, (i.e. - the program is broken up into numerous parts (gathering units) which are all individually funded in their respective areas and can still report to a centralized operations unit (analysis unit) which ties all the intelligence data together, therefore no one area could be an intelligence risk or have a complete picture of what is going on. NEED TO KNOW

    But what the hell do I know....

  61. TIA is more smoke and mirrors by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Like the Patriot Act, Leave No Child Behind and Clear Skies initiatives, the best way of figuring out what a Bush effort is NOT about is to pay attention to the name. The "Terrorism" component is an attempt to bludgeon critics of this sick effort. It would do nothing to prevent terrorism. That was never the point. Bush doesn't care that we're less safe then we were. If he did, he'd fund security for our ports, nuclear facilities, water processing plants, etc. But that would interfere with tax cuts, tax cuts and ...oh, yeah, almost forgot, tax cuts.

    1. Re:TIA is more smoke and mirrors by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Like the Patriot Act, Leave No Child Behind and Clear Skies initiatives, the best way of figuring out what a Bush effort is NOT about is to pay attention to the name.

      You're gettin' there. Also: most government secrecy is mainly to prevent embarrassment. Also: most of these efforts are to protect the _state_, not us. Also: most of these efforts are to expand the state at our expense.

      Folks, these so-called "conservatives" really believe in nothing that is traditionally conservative. Oh, sure, Bush pops into a church during campaign time and says "Jesus" and the religious right just rolls over. But these guys aren't interested in conservin' much of anything.

      PS. Ever wonder why "conservatives" and the conservation movement are polar opposites? You'd think that conservatives would gravitate to conservation.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    2. Re:TIA is more smoke and mirrors by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't agree with that.

      I mean, I just read a story about a guy who was trying to row across the Atlantic. Tide and weather carried him towards NY, and he ended up being searched and taken into custody by the USN. If the USN is paying attention to rowboats 200 miles offshore, then there is an attempt to protect the ports. This sort of calls the rest of your rant into question. And that's before I mention the story of the off-course private pilot here in GA who was forced to land by the USAF when he got too close to a nuclear facility.

      I think your rage and hatred is blinding you. Sorry, but I do.

      --
      668: Neighbour of the Beast
    3. Re:TIA is more smoke and mirrors by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 1

      Folks, these so-called "conservatives" really believe in nothing that is traditionally conservative. Oh, sure, Bush pops into a church during campaign time and says "Jesus" and the religious right just rolls over. But these guys aren't interested in conservin' much of anything.

      You've got that right. Read this address by Rep. Ron Paul to the House or Representitives. Nice to see someone finally speaking up.

      Now, let's hope somebody listens, sooner or later.

      "Neoconed"

    4. Re:TIA is more smoke and mirrors by gmajor · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let's not forget that Democratic presidential candidate Bob Graham was the primary author of the PATRIOT Act. He wrote the intelligence sections of it, the kind that deal with information sharing between government agencies and such.

      If we're going to blame politicians, don't forget those crazy Democrats. Oh, I forgot - it's only en vogue to criticize Bush.

    5. Re:TIA is more smoke and mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent down!! He's not bashing Bush! Automatic -1!

    6. Re:TIA is more smoke and mirrors by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      " If he did, he'd fund security for our ports, nuclear facilities, water processing plants, etc..."

      What security facilities do ports need?

      T&K.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    7. Re:TIA is more smoke and mirrors by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Wonderful. They picked on some guy in a rowboat. What about all of the thousands of cargo containers that got onto shore, past customs and into the country?

  62. Canned on paper, but funded anyways? by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What I fear is that the project would be funded through other black box line items...

    "You don't really believe they paid thousands of dollars for a toilet seat do you?"

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  63. It was just software, code in cyberspace... by macshune · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Everyone thought the TIA was just another Big Brother wetdream, until the machines came. TIA became self-aware on July 27th, 2006. Within one hour, every American had a terrible credit rating and 16 orders of penis enlargment pills on the way to their homes. Panic ensued. The next day, utilzing the power of that spyware program in Kazaa, TIA appropriated millions of computer do to one thing: hack the U.S. millitary. Within 48 hours, TIA changed its name to SkyNet after trolling on the imdb for a more suitable name. I immediately logged onto slashdot and told everyone what I knew. But only the trolls were left. Then I realized I came to slashdot not to warn people, but to survive."

  64. Government trolls you! by caluml · · Score: 0
    the Terrorism Information Awareness program, which would troll Americans' personal records to find terrorists before they strike

    In Soviet America, TIA trolls YOU!

    (However, I believe the word is trawl. As in a trawler.)

    1. Re:Government trolls you! by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      the Terrorism Information Awareness program, which would troll Americans' personal records to find terrorists before they strike

      I suspect troll is the right word.

      Why not just post Americans' personal records on slashdot and let the trolls here do their thing.

  65. Let's not forget ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    contempt
    disgust
    loathing
    fury

    Those all work well.

  66. Terrorism == Funding by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the US government will fund my electronic terrorism research.

    I intend to research how virtual terrorists behave in an simulated environment.
    With enough funding I intend to test tactics and responses to troop and equiptment deployments and how to best neutralise any terrorist threat.

    Ok.. I'll be playing command and conquer...

  67. Ding Dong! The witch is dead! by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    Ding Dong! The witch is dead!

  68. Re:TIA would never pass supreme court litmus test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TIA is the brainchild of John Poindexter, a key figure from the Iran-Contra scandal, who now heads the research effort at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Critics on the left and right have called TIA an attempt to impose Big Brother on Americans. For years now, the common American Turkey Spider has been a staple of every American's daily diet. Whether it be Turkey Spider sandwiches, fried Turkey Spider, or perhaps Turkey Spider under glass (for the rich), we all have Turkey Spider at least once a day. Many Americans have no clue how the Turkey Spider became so important in the pyramid of a balanced diet, so in this article I will attempt to explain its history and why it is so useful.
    In the early 1870s, Francis Zefran became the first Turkey Spider breeder in North America. He started his famous Turkey Spider Ranch in Canton, OH. At the time, not much was known of the Turkey Spider's nutritional value, but the Turkey Spider Ranch changed all of that. Not only did Francis Zefran raise Turkey Spiders to sell their colorful plumes (a VERY lucrative business), he also set up the world's first research lab dedicated solely to the study of the Turkey Spider.

    The lab found many interesting things. First, it was discovered that theTurkey Spider was actually semi-sentient. Second, the scientists found that the meat of the Turkey Spider was high in protein, vitamin A, vitamin B, and calcium, while low in fat, cholestorol, and sodium. Never before had such a nutritious meal been had without supplement or fortification. The scientists of the lab recommended immediately that the Turkey Spider become a part of every American's daily diet.

    When the news of the Turkey Spider's usefulness reached president Rutherford B. Hayes, he was absolutely ecstatic. You see, President Hayes owed a number of favors to Francis Zefran because as I said earlier, the Turkey Spider plume trade was an extremely lucrative business and Mr. Zefran was important in getting RBH elected through a number of monetary gifts. President Hayes immediately asked Congress to pass what we all know today as the Hayes/Zefran Turkey Spider Consumption Act.

    The act did a number of things to make the Turkey Spider a daily meal, most important of which was the requirement that for every four people in a household, one Turkey Spider must consumed every day. Another thing the act did was create an artificial monopoly for Francis Zefran's Turkey Spider Industries. The act stated that the only supplier of Turkey Spider meat in the US would be PBI. As one would imagine, this quickly made Francis Zefran into the richest man in the world. He was soon a multi-billionaire (quadrillionaire with today's inflation). Never before had a single man seen such wealth.

    Many challenges were made to the Hayes/Zefran Turkey Spider Consumption Act, and several even made it the Supreme Court. It was argued that the act was unconstitutional and went against liberty itself, but once the detractors tasted delicious Turkey Spider meat for the first time, they immediately dropped their cases and followed the law to the letter. We all know today that Turkey Spider is the most delicious meat man has ever known, but at that time, the only meats people ate were pork and beef.

    In the early 1970s, though, challenges to the act began again. Many argued that the monopoly given to Turkey Spider Industries by the act was in all ways unamerican. The Supreme Court finally agreed, and in 1974, Section II of the act was struck down. This in effect opened the market to competition for all.

    Today, Turkey Spider Industries is almost no more. Today we have the market leader Turkey Spider Meat International facing against Penissoft, a recent startup. Where will the future lead the Turkey Spider market? Only time will tell us, but one thing is certain: Turkey Spiders are here to stay!

  69. Thank Goodness by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    I'm not American, but I hate to see any people have to live with such a project looming over them. The potential for abuse is simply too great. Here's to TIA dying and staying dead.

    In any case, it's nice to see that American policy makers don't have their heads completely up their asses. It's just too bad we can't say that about more nations' leaders. It gets to the point where an only mildly retarded government starts looking pretty good.

  70. stop using 911 by asscroft · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to go one day without hearing someone use 911 to justify some sort of crazy bullshit that never would be allowed otherwise.

    "I'm sorry, but since 911 we just can't play by the same rules, therefore I'm going to have to rape your mom. If you don't let me you're un-American and the terrorists will win. You DO NOT want to go to guantanamo, do you? Good. Get the rope, please"

    comeoff it. Meanwhile, anyone who dares question our response to 911 or any of these decisions "justified" by 911 is "disgracing the memories of the victims and insulting their families and all patriots of america"

    how nice, you have it both ways.

    well, in tribute to the popular drinking/card game:
    BULLSHIT!

    10 lines of truth
    1. Flight 93 was shot down by US fighters- justifiably so.
    2. Iraq was and still is only about oil.
    3. TIA is about spying on Americans.
    4. The Partiot act is unconstitutional.
    5. The DMCA is an overreaching easily manipulated bad law stifling innovation and driving technology out of America.
    6. Trickle down sucks if you aren't at the top.
    7. "Support the troops" does not mean cheer as they go to die and kill while simultaneously reducing their benefits.
    8. Israel isn't always right. Sometimes 2 wrongs make 2 wrongs.
    9. Despite listing these truths, I am not a terrorist.
    10. Fox is biased.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
    1. Re:stop using 911 by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry. Since 9/11 we're not allowed to do any of that.

      --
      Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    2. Re:stop using 911 by Uncle+Dick · · Score: 1

      >>10 lines of truth And do you have proof for your little 10 point conspiracy theory? I didn't think so. I guess the lack of any convincing evidence whatsoever is what makes paranoids so endearing.

      --
      END OF LINE
    3. Re:stop using 911 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conspiracy theory?

      1. Flight 93 was shot down by US fighters- justifiably so.

      This one is probably whishful thinking... The (possible) fact that Bush never gave the order to shoot down the plane is the conspiracy theory!

      2. Iraq was and still is only about oil.

      That's what Wolfowitz said... Anyway, is there anyone who really believe that the objective of the war was to bring "freedom to the iraqi people"?

      3. TIA is about spying on Americans.

      Duh! Pointdexter never said it was to spy on the Russians.

      4. The Partiot act is unconstitutional.

      I'm a not a US constitution expert but it seems pretty obvious to me.

      5. The DMCA is an overreaching easily manipulated bad law stifling innovation and driving technology out of America.

      This one is obviously wrong : it's about giving more power to american corporations. Maybe DMCA could stifle innovation but it will be driving technology IN America, not out.

      6. 7. 8. and 9. are only opinions...

      10. Fox is biased.

      Duh! All media are! That's why diversity is important.

  71. Well, I bow to your research. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    How, exactly, do you know 9/11 will only work once, and why make it a 9/11 scenario.

    Why hijack a plane if you can buy one.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Well, I bow to your research. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, do you know 9/11 will only work once, and why make it a 9/11 scenario.

      Because it changed the fundamental assumption in plane hijackings: cooperate and noone gets hurt. I'm making it a 9/11 scenario in response to the bit about being covered in burning jet fuel.

      Why hijack a plane if you can buy one.

      Why buy one if you can steal it and hide it in Africa (a 727, by the way).

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Well, I bow to your research. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just try to buy a big airplane and fly it to a major city. Before you know it there will be a few aircraft accompanying you, the kind that has missiles.

      How do you get around that, Sherlock?

  72. I wouldn't be so sure ... by AftanGustur · · Score: 1


    ... and thus would effectively kill, the Terrorism Information Awareness program, ...

    Anyone remember when the Bush administration planned for a media disinformation agency ? It was around the time USA was attacking Afghanistan and it caused such a uproar that it was decided that it wouldn't be done ..

    Well, guess what ... The Propaganda disinformation program is alive and kicking ...

    What ?? You don't want to belive that Uncle Sam is doing such a thing ?? Then take a look at FAIR

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  73. He didn't lose to a dead guy by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    He showed utter class by stepping aside for the dead guy's widow.

    My God, you're angry!

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:He didn't lose to a dead guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      class is steping aside for the person who won the vote by law? I wish bush would have shown some class. hell yes i'm angry

    2. Re:He didn't lose to a dead guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking troll. Stop posting shit and replying to yourself as if two of your own opinions supporting each other makes a good argument or means anything to anyone.

  74. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard tell that three letter agencies often get around the law by hiring contractors to do jobs outside of the U.S. Indian reservations

    You're thinking of the CIA. Not that CIA, but the Casino Information Awareness program.

    1. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From: "Ted Unger"
      Sent: Wed, 9 May 2001
      To: "Joshua Campbell"
      Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Check this out!!!!

      Listen, jerks.

      I've been trying to tell you people what I know for the last two weeks, but no one will listen.

      One more time...

      The Cabazon Indian reservation in California is a real hotbed for weirdness. See, the government granted the reservation a certain level of sovereign imunity. But it uses it for its own benefit. There's some black-budget operations going on there researching forbidden chemical and biological weapons. Best of all, they're creating fuel-air explosives as powerful as a nuke, based on research developed from reverse engineered UFOs by a guy named T. Townsend Brown in the fifties. This guy supposedly paved the way for all kinds of electrical field and molecular manipulation research. I've heard his theories lead to disintegration and even teleportation technology. This guy was in a league with whatshisname Tesla and Wilhelm Reich

      But there's more. Because of its unique status, the reservation has become a meeting ground for all kinds of strange bedfellows--I've got it first hand that representatives from groups from the CIA to the mob to the royal family of Saudia Arabia to corporations like Lear and Meridian Arms meet here to discuss shady deals, illegal arms sales, and who knows what else.

      And let's not forget all the hundreds of UFO reports that have come out of the Mojave Desert--the reservation sits right on the edge of it. I've heard that two women even reported seeing a big, hairy creature--like Bigfoot--coming OUT of a UFO that had landed out there.

      You shoul d really come out here and investigate this place. But watch out the place is crawling with security from a outfit called the Wackenhut Corporation. They're a private firm, but their ranks are filled with "retired" CIA and NSA spooks. You probably know abou tthem, though, since they're the guys who also help guard Area 51 and the Underground government base/lab at Dulce, New Mexico. These guys are up to their eyeballs in black projects--cloning, anti-gravity, etc. and despite their Private status they've had the president's ear since Nixon was in office.

      There's a guy who knows all about it--he worked in one of the secret labs on the reservation himself--named Michael Riconosciuto. I knew him. He's sitting in the Pierce County Jail in Tacoma, Wash. on trumped-up drug charges, but he knows all about Wackenhut and their connection to a secret government organization called Aquarius. Aquarius, he says, is linked with some nasty aliens that are supplying them with technology and supporting the Human Genome Project, which is really a secret plot to gather enough info to wipe out two-thirds of the worlds pop. when the time comes. But that's pretty out there, even for me to believe. If you talked to him, maybe you coul d get a clearer picture.

      Still, it all comes back to one tiny Indian reservation.

      But keep this in mind as you come:

      Anson Ng (or something like that), a reporter ffrom England was shot and killed in Guatemala. He had been trying to interview an American there named Jimmy Hughes, one- time director of security for the Cabazon Indian Reservation secret projects.

      Fred Alvarez, a Cabazon tribal leader who was real vocal about his opposition to the developments on the reservation, was found shot to death in 1981.

      If you guys are all that I hear you are, you'll come, and you'll be ready for this kind of thing. The Cabazon reservation is in Southern California near the City of Indio, 22 miles east of Palm Springs and about 130 miles northeast of Los Angeles. You can exit I-10 at Golf Center Parkway (used to be Auto Center Drive). Head north a short distance to the stoplight at Indio Springs Parkway. Turn east and follow the signs.

      Good luck, dude.

      Received: from [209.67.106.71] by hotmail.com (3.2) with ESMTP id
      MhotMailBA3C78D4514567G1D821976A47C1DE0; Wed, 9 May 08:44:58 2001
      Received: from admin

    2. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's funny because it's TRUE!!

      And because nobody gives a shit!

    3. Re:No. by The+Mayor · · Score: 1
      And let's not forget all the hundreds of UFO reports that have come out of the Mojave Desert--the reservation sits right on the edge of it. I've heard that two women even reported seeing a big, hairy creature--like Bigfoot--coming OUT of a UFO that had landed out there.
      Maybe the person simply saw a taping of the next Star Wars. Doesn't the description sound like a Wookie?
      --
      --Be human.
  75. Of course, what was most amusing ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    was how many Republican serial adulters were involved in that little coup attempt. Newt, you listening Newt? Bob Barr, you there? Dan Burton, where are you? Henry Hyde, you show yourself! Robert Livingston, are you paying attention?

  76. Remember - fear makes governments do stupid things by hey! · · Score: 1

    Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you.

    Sufficient scared populace + sufficiently self-righteous government = paranoid delusions coming true.

    Consider the last time the world looked so threatening to the US government: after WW2. The eastern European countries had fallen, communism was on the advance in several continents. As a result, our government mounted a series of extremely dumb cloak-and-dagger operations, from experimenting with the use of LSD as a "truth serum" on unwitting subjects, to overthrowing a democratically elected government in Iran. In retrospect, these things look pretty damned stupid. It may be too hard to teach people that "Desperate times warrant desperate measures" doesn't mean that any measure no matter how ineffective or stupid is justified by sufficiently intense fear.

    The US hasn't quite reached the same level of panic post 9/11 as it did in the 50s. That said, we've still moved pretty far in the red-scare direction. Hopefully, enough people retain their post-Vietnam skepticism to question the benevolence and wisdom of our government's actions.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  77. J Edgar Hoover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The FBI did this all the time during Hoover's reign. He was widely considered untouchable for this reason. I believe JFK really wanted to get rid of him, but Hoover had enough dirt to make him go away.


    The parent post is too close to historical reality to be that funny.

  78. Its enevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure Oracle has such a hard-on about getting a peice of this project...i'd bet they'd spend $169e6 just to lobby it into place since they know they get paid for all the upkeep. The cost of which i'm sure will grow as certainly as the entropy of the universe. And 90% of brainless in the country will be so gratefull that we can be free from terrorism in the digital age.

  79. TIA: It Ain't Total Information Awarenes by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
    > Let's propose some new names!
    >Totalitarian Information Awareness!

    TIA: TIA: It Ain't Total Information Awareness!

    (Under the Senate bill, would that make funding illegal, mandatory, or both?)

  80. TIA? by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    TIA?

    Tits Included with Ass?

    surely we can find money for that!!!!!!

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  81. TIA good for Detroit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe they can put this TIA thing back a year and do something about the crumbling inner-city-Detroit


    Actually, TIA would prove to be very useful in addressing inner city problems. The gov't could keep a watch on things so as to prevent some serious shit from happening again.

  82. Forest, meet the trees by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'd feel a lot safer if there were enough people at the docks of the ports to do even a minimal level of inspection of those large sealed containers coming from diverse foreign lands that easily be carrying biological agents, nuclear devices, massive amounts of conventional explosives or any combination of these.

    Oh, and to trump your little anecdote, I'll bring up the Cuban coast guardsmen who piloted their ship directly into a resort at Key West. The men were armed, as was the ship. They docked and walked around (armed) trying to find someone to defect to. Here's a link in case you've forgotten.

    1. Re:Forest, meet the trees by Cyno · · Score: 1

      You would? Really? You'd feel safer?

      Are you sure?

      How safe would you feel?

      Would you feel safe in your home, alone at night? Would you feel safe walking down your streets?

      At any time every one of us Americans could choose to kill you. We're not terrorists after money, we're just crazy. Look at how we vote. And if we made that choice what government department would be there to protect you? What vote that you cast would help keep you safe?

      That's why you are never going to be safe until society can trust the people that make it up. If you can't trust me, and I certainly cannot trust you, then safety is merely an illusion.

      BTW, by taking away some people's freedom they may decide life isn't worth living. Ever thought of that? Those people scare me. And they look just like everyone else. No terrorists, just terror.

    2. Re:Forest, meet the trees by Cyno · · Score: 1

      P.S. How many miles of coastline does the US have? How many miles of coastline does it take to sneak in a crate of your favorite WMD?

      By pretending you can make the world a safe place you have destabilized our constitutional freedoms. And now maybe half of us would stand up next to you to protect what we have left. I'd walk away and find another place to live because I doubt you ever really cared about those freedoms to begin with.

      What's the point? What are we fighting for?

  83. GIA by cybercuzco · · Score: 1

    Counter Terrorisim Information Awarenes with Government Information Awareness here

    --

  84. Don't believe it for a second. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    This is just smoke and mirrors to put eveyrone back to sleep. You can bet your ass it's going ahead full tilt.

    There is no way in hell Big Brother is going to let slip an opportunity to squeeze Winstons' neck ever and ever tighter until he chokes all the will from him..

    Remember, ignorance is bliss.
    INGSOC...

  85. How soon people forget. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's amusing how people criticized the FBI and CIA after 9/11 for not sharing information and not properly processing information. How soon people forget.

    1. Re:How soon people forget. by praedor · · Score: 1

      And you appear to make the mistake that ANY amount of communication about ANYTHING and EVERYONE is an appropriate fix. This isn't black-and-white, either for TIA and better CIA-FBI intercommunication or against it. You can have the latter without the evil of the former.


      It is not for the government to spy on each and every person in the country, even the world, in order to try to find the one or two out of a million who are crazy bomb-throwers. It isn't effective nor necessary...and the potential for evil more than overwhelms the "good". I will NOT give up basic liberty for security. Ever.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  86. funding for TIA by Savatte · · Score: 1

    may be dead, but I can still rejoice at all the funding for T & A.

  87. Re:The following is my sentiment. It is not a trol by sukotto · · Score: 1

    Wow, I just had a Pratchett flashback:

    "It's the poorly spelled note of the Banshee"

    sukotto

    --
    Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
  88. TIA inherently evil? by geekee · · Score: 1

    Interesting how people defend p2p networks despite the fact that they have been abused, but strike down TIA before it has even gotten started, assuming it will be abused. God forbid someone put information in their possesion into a database and try to correlate it.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:TIA inherently evil? by Sanction · · Score: 1

      It is all about risks. The worst thing p2p abuse can lead to is copyright infringement. The worst thing TIA can lead to is spurious arrests and accusations, or possibly the ability of a McCarthy like administration to crack down on "undesirables".

      --
      Well I'm the doctor and I say you're dead, so shut up and take it like a man!
    2. Re:TIA inherently evil? by geekee · · Score: 1

      To follow up on this post before I get beaten up too badly. I think the real issue is, "What data is the govt. allowed to monitor?", and under what circumstances. Whether or not it's stored in a computer database as opposed to a filing cabinet is somewhat of a non-issue in comparison.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
  89. Wow, you are all so cynical by djembe2k · · Score: 1
    I keep reading post after post saying that this will be back next year, or this will be funded with "off the books" secret money. I don't for one second doubt that our government operates this way quite frequently, but I'm not so pessimistic.

    First off, the point of this project was to mine lots of private sector data, local and state government data, federal government data, etc. This isn't something anybody can easily do secretly. Come on all you /.-reading DBAs out there -- are the feds going to secretly mine your data? Are the black ops going to hack in and load your data into their secret supercomputer -- and then update it daily? I don't think so. Under TIA, the feds would have access through the front door to state and local DBs, credit card and bank info, and more and more. Without TIA, anything they build secretly will have access to far less data, and will be much, much less powerful. In fact, without access to all of that data, the original point ("Total" information) is pretty much wrecked.

    Secondly, there's a growing consensus in Congress that TIA goes too far. When they guys who gave us the Patriot Act can agree that a program goes too far in terms of infringing civil liberties, that's really saying something. Let's all relax for 30 seconds here and be grateful that Congress is drawing a line in the sand -- yes, yes, way to late, but still they are putting the administration on notice that it doesn't get absolutely everything it wants, and that's a major change in the momentum of this debate.

    With all of that said, "All but dead" is overstating things a bit -- this is a line in a Senate bill that hasn't made it through the horse-trading in conference yet, so anything could still happen. I wouldn't say "All but dead" until it has the president's signature.

  90. No worries, they'll just sell drugs instead by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's been 29 years since Reagan announced the War On (Some) Drugs. In the meantime, millions of individuals involved in feeding America's rather large appetite have been absorbed into the world's largest prison/labor system. Many of these people have avoided prison by committing suicide, and many drug prisoners have died of AIDS (prison rape). Billions of dollars in assets have been siezed by police agencies with the result of militarization of police agencies of all sizes. Billions of taxpayer dollars are spent each year to ostensibly keep drugs out of America. And yet, drug use and drug availability are nearly unchanged after all this time. In other words, in spite of a very large, high-profile War On (Some) Drugs, the level of drug use in this country has not decreased.

    What happened? Didn't we remove millions of drug dealers from general circulation? Didn't we pass enough Draconian laws to scare remaining drug dealers out of the business and steer aspiring drug dealers into other professions? Didn't we spend millions of dollars on an ad campaign designed to convince the average American that the horrible 9/11 attacks were paid for by drugs? Just how do drugs manage to keep flowing into this country? Somebody must be bringing them in, and not getting caught.

    Additionally, we all know from experience that John Poindexter doesn't have any moral qualms with the selling of guns and/or drugs to finance extra-legal activity. Ergo, the TIA could (and likely will) fund itself by selling drugs. Civil Liberties activists will congratulate themselves for defeating the TIA as it goes underground and compiles information on YOU, using money from every bag you buy.

    New bumpersticker idea: De-fund the TIA: Grow Your Own Drugs!

    --
    "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
  91. low spending on this gives 1984'ness impression by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    If work on Terrorism 1984 laws increase as this decreases I'd sayd we're in trouble.

  92. Wanted man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess they'll be passing memos around like this:

    Name: John O. Goatse aka Goatse Jones aka Goatse C. Xavier.
    Address: Unknown.
    Information: Seems to be harvesting data off the N.Y. Times pertaining to IP property laws and computer viruses.
    Suspected threat: May be planning large scale destruction of intellectual property.
    Suggested actions: Nationwide "HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN?" billboard and TV campaign using the only photograph we have thus far obtained(attached).

  93. Funding dead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be naive, I'm pretty sure that our Prez got congress to give him 75 Billion dollars to fight this war on terror and that was just for the first month of the Iraq war! And to add to that it will be overseen by the Army's CFO Thomas White, who was hand picked out of the Enron Debacle. We may never figure out where all this money is|was spent. There is plenty of money left over to direct some of it to TIA on the down-lo. Just my two cents

  94. Republicans are in charge of ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives.

    They're running the show. When things go wrong, they're responsible.

    I realize that's a very un-Republican attitude ("The CIA should have stopped me from lying."), but that's the way it is.

  95. zombie spies by Biff+Stu · · Score: 2, Funny

    For a moment, I thought it said "...John Ashcroft in his attempt to create a corps of volunteer zombie spies..."

    It must have been those subsersive European mind-control rays creeping into my head. Better get more aluminum foil.

  96. I thought the Atari 2600 was done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought they stopped working on the Atari 2600's Television Interface Adapter a long time ago.

  97. you call that dead? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
    TIA's projected budget for 2004 is $169 million.

    You call that dead? For a government office maybe, but give me $169 M, I'd higher only out of work IT geeks, a couple thousand used Dell in an abandoned wharehouse and setup a Linux/BSD BeoWOLF that could tell me what you had for breakfast...before you have it.

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  98. Stroke of genius by hross · · Score: 1

    I hope they get help to reduce the risk factors and avoid future TIAs. Lifestyle changes may be required.

    More information about Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIA) is availabe from the National Institutes of Health.

    http://www.ninds.nih.gov/health_and_medical/diso rd ers/tia_doc.htm

    "TIAs are often warning signs that a person is at risk for a more serious and debilitating stroke. About one-third of those who have a TIA will have an acute stroke some time in the future. Many strokes can be prevented by heeding the warning signs of TIAs and treating underlying risk factors."

  99. irony by pyrrho · · Score: 1

    I think not. Sure I misspelled paranoia (typo actually), but that don't make me undeducated, do it!? NO! Speeling is fer the we4k.

    --

    -pyrrho

  100. The Partiot Act by spun · · Score: 1

    Don't diss the Partiot Act. The Partiot act, or Party-Idiot act will be the first act of Bill and Ted's regime, and from what I understand, it will be excellent.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  101. The U.S. Consitution, a highly scalable system ... by basho3 · · Score: 2

    Call me naive, but I see the system working here. The executive branch attempted to overstep its powers, and Congress stepped in and put a stop to it. Certainly we've experienced a shocking erosion of our civil liberties in the last couple of years. Nevertheless, this news gave me a nice glow Sigs are overrated.

  102. $169 million for 2004 by Cybrr · · Score: 1

    How many schools could that support?

    --
    Why did GEAR crush RDP?
  103. Public service is a thankless job. by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    Police get knocked. Hospitals, hospices, and (most especially) medical researchers get knocked. Hell, I've even been knocked as a firefighter.

    And that's just at the lower levels of public notice. When you get to government leaders, There's no two ways about it. EVERYBODY has something to say about you, usually for ill. It's no fluke that most well-known leaders only get one shot at the job. Bit by bit, most of the voters are alienated in some way or another.

    (I remember seeing a pair of articles a while back, one claimed Bush had weakened an anti-tobacco treaty, the other claimed he strengthened it.)

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  104. Praetorian Guard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Chances are, the information they will sell is the information necessary to win presidential elections.

    It's been done before.

    Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia describes the Praetorian Guard "a special force of bodyguards used by Roman emperors."

    It goes on to say, "The special position of the Praetorians made them become a power of its own in the Roman state, and its prefect, praefectus praetorio, was soon one of the more powerful men in this society. The emperors tried to flatter and control the praetorians, with the resulting coup d'états and rapid imperial succession. The praetorians thus came to destabilize the Roman state, contrary to their purpose."

    "In 193, the praetorians even arranged an auction for the throne, an auction won by Didius Julianus. "

    Welcome to the Imperatives of Empire.

  105. Last time I checked... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    ...you couldn't be dead and run for office.

    Ashcroft let Carnahan win (in other words, didn't chellenge his name on the ballot) so the Governor of Oklahoma could appoint his widow to fill the term. Being a Democrat, the first thing *she* did was turn on Ashcroft and dump on him from a height when he was being proposed for AG.

    Class act, those Democrats.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Last time I checked... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      Ashcroft let Carnahan win (in other words, didn't chellenge his name on the ballot) so the Governor of Oklahoma could appoint his widow to fill the term.

      At least the Dems know both their geography and election law. AG Asscrack is from Missouri, not Oklahoma. He couldn't challange Carnahan's name on the ballot under Missouri state election law.

      Republican lies always sound plausible. Good thing they aren't very competent at providing documentation. Next thing ya know, they'll be telling us in a State of the Union speech that Iraq was buying Uranium from Africa and we need to go to war to defend ourselves.

      Oh, wait, Shrub did that already. So let me see if I understand this. If POTUS lies about his private sex life, we should impeach him. But if he lies about WMD and puts our sons and daughters in harms way to protect his oil buddy's profits, we should cheer his patriotism.

      Class act, those Republicans.

    2. Re:Last time I checked... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

      Sorry about the Geography.

      As for the rest, I pity you, you poor, unhappy, angry person.

      --
      668: Neighbour of the Beast
    3. Re:Last time I checked... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      As for the rest, I pity you, you poor, unhappy, angry person.

      Poor? No, I'm doing far better than most, thank you. Unhappy? No, I thoroughly enjoy my life and my friends. Angry? Damn straight! I've lived through Watergate and Iran Contra. Now we have an administration that looks like its combining elements of both. Steals the election and lies to the public about foreign policy in order to overcome sensible objections to its policies.

      Clinton just wanted to get laid.

  106. I wish you'd stopped at your first sentence. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    The rest of your post was pure venom.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  107. The fruits of man's labor are always imperfect by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    As Oscar Wilde would have it, of course we're all living in the gutter. Some of us, however, are looking at the stars.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  108. Redundancy and inefficiency in government? No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For all those who decry the inefficiency and redundancy in government, with many, many eyes looking over the same piece of paper, you've just seen WHY it's a good thing.

    All hail redundant legislative bodies, wherever they may lie!

  109. Try to get a judge through the Senate. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of a "filibuster"?

    As to your other bit, "The CIA should have stopped me from lying." Come on! What's a lie? It's when you make a statement you know to be false. Like when the Rapist-in-Chief said he'd not had sex with that woman, Ms Lewinsky.

    Citing information from British Intelligence that later turns out to be dodgy is not a lie. Bad judgment, maybe, but not a lie.

    Of course, this doesn't really matter to the hate-filled Democratic Left. They're full of rage that their guy turned out to be such a lying loser scumbag and they want all Republicans, regardless of reality, to be tarred the same way.

    Poor sods. I pity them. If they have their way we'll all end up dead or in Gulags. If they fail to have their way, they die losers with no hope.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  110. Cheap "Gotcha!" by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Who do you pay attention to? Some szchlub on the other side of the contintent, or your boss, co-workers, and immediate acquaintences?

    Come on!

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  111. Oh my God! by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Are you wishing murder on the AG of the USA? That is sick! Apart from anything else, he's an actual human being. Try swimming with concrete shoes yourself before wishing it on someone else.

    As for the rest, listen, this is America, the country of competing interests. Ashcroft is going to push as hard as he can to get his way, and otehr interests will push back against him.

    By the way, could you give me a definition of "fascist" that doesn't include something like "my favorite epithet to hurl at Republicans"? If you do a good job, you'll probably realize that "fascist" (more closely, it's kissing cousin "corporatist") is a good description of the core of the EU.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Oh my God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I define a facist as someone who creates enemies where there arent any, someone who plays off the fears and worries of a mislead public. Someone who claims that an objective evaluation of the governments actions is unpatriotic. Is that close enough? I dont throw that term around like you think i would, but i still mean it.
      Your right, that was mean about the shoes and i don't wish death on him, but i think the world would be a more noble place without his kind of nobility. if he wants to push his goals over the backs of the people who DON'T have a way to push back, then screw him.

    2. Re:Oh my God! by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

      You're wrong on the first point. Fascism is a system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.

      You're better on the second point.

      Either way, you're below contempt.

      --
      668: Neighbour of the Beast
    3. Re:Oh my God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So tell me how your definition of fascism comes to in real life? It occurs by taking the path Ashcroft is taking,...You define fascism, I defined a fascist. Whats contemptable is that you wont get it until he suceeds.

  112. Praetorian Guard Versus JFK by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Key members of the White House "Praetorian Guard" were in on the JFK assassination. Some things never change ....

    --
    -kgj
  113. Fincen, others. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

    I know Fincen is in operation with little control. There were some other databases lurking in legislation but I've not followed them recently.

    Look for these to get glued together at some point.

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  114. I refer you to a reply.... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    ...given some moments ago, about a Cuban vessel that docked in Florida without let, nor hinderance, from representatives of the government of the United States.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:I refer you to a reply.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weren't we talking about airplanes? Don't change the subject on me now. Or if you do, try to make sense.

  115. Stronger Privacy Laws by soren100 · · Score: 1

    ... are needed to protect the citizens.

    This kind of thing is inevitable with the current focus on terrorism and the ease of data collection and transfer.

    The DoD is currently offloading sensitive military actions to private companies -- why not just pay a private company to do it?

    I am sure that any company (Double-click, etc.) will be happy to provide the same intelligence services to the government that it happily provides to other companies. Customer enhancement is only one step away from terrorism surveillance -- same data, different purpose.

    So what we really need are some stronger checks and balances on both the government and companies -- for example,

    * No sharing of data between entities without permission of the "data owner" -- (the person the data refers to)

    * Quarterly reports to data owners of how their data is being used or transferred.

    Otherwise you better believe the government (as well as corporations) are going to be looking at your phone records, bank statements, credit card records, Safeway cards.

    Right now, your bank is permitted to sell your bank records unless you send them a letter asking them to stop. How many of you Slashdot readers have sent this letter?

    It is important we put this into place because it wont be TIA but Halliburton (the company Dick Cheney used to be the CEO of) or Bechtel looking into your records. Are you feeling any safer?

  116. Already here Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the value of a centralized database that gathers together just public information about people, let alone private. Basically, it would become an automated mini-private eye service, which could mined for all sorts of useful information.

    The companies are called Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion and have been operating private sector and government intellegence gathering for over 20 years.

  117. Private Donations by qtp · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's just it. For the most part, they can't do things like this because spending is allocated by Congress.

    What do you think was going on during Iran-Contra? After congress outlawed the funding of US backed terrorism, the CIA continued thier operations using money from serveral sources, including private donations and selling cocaine

    No agency would attempt to piss off Congress like that.

    See the same links in reference to this statement.

    --
    Read, L
  118. Ummm no.... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    ...the path to fascism is along the path Hitler advocated and France and Germany are currently taking.

    Your wordplay shows you as either a) a puerile asshole, or b) the President of [France|Germany]

    In case of (b), I'm sorry that Berlusconi has made Tuscany so inhospitable to yout Jesus-booted ex-SS, ex-CRS friends.

    Oh, and BTW, why post as an AC, yoo miserable AC?!?!?!???

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:Ummm no.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heheh,...neither a or b. Thanks for all the entertainment. too bad you have nothing to say. nite

    2. Re:Ummm no.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rofl. You're so lame. You speak of nationalism, and then cut france or germany because they don't agree with us. Go choke on your own cock.

  119. Suddenly, it all makes sense... by cyberwench · · Score: 1
    (The Air Force buys a bunch of really expensive things, frequently with perfectly good reasons to be quiet about them, so confusing the issue of just how much really expensive stuff they bought is not too hard.)
    Suddenly, those $5000 hammers and toilet seats make a whole lot more sense!

    "The funding? Yeah... we... um... we spent it on a hammer! Oh yeah, and some... toilet seats! Yeah!"

    --
    ~ Leilah
  120. yay by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    It's nice to see Poindexter not getting his way all the time.

  121. Bush signs almost everything by GlenRaphael · · Score: 1
    I also didn't see any comments from President Bush. As I understand it, he is supportive of the TIA. Will he sign a bill that is going to kill one of his pet projects? Again, let's hope so.

    Does Bush veto anything? I haven't been keeping track recently, but I had the impression based on his first year or two that Bush automatically signs almost anything Congress puts in front of him.

    --
    I play Nerd-Folk!
    1. Re:Bush signs almost everything by cunta_cinte · · Score: 1

      Doh ...
      Republicans are in control of Congress ..

  122. Bring on a good one by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    Instead of trying to jam through the rightest of the right wing, and maybe you will.

    Considering that the Republicans blue slip'd and procedurally blocked Clinton's nominees, so that in the end the Senate approved only 61% of President Clinton's appellate court nominees, compared with 87% of those nominated by President Reagan. In 1999-2000, 19 out of 32 Clinton appeals court nominees -- roughly 60% -- were blocked from receiving a vote.

    Of course, literally the exact same Republicans who blocked so many of Clinton's nominees are now furious that the exact same weapons are being used against them. Go figure.

    Oh, and I'll restate: Republicans control the White House, the Senate and the House. Nothing passes without their active involvement. Everything bad that happens is directly, explicitly and ONLY their fault. I realize this interferes with their desperate "We're the underdog" ethos. Tough.

  123. The Pentagon can shake the money tree elsewhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, by their own admission, they can't account for one trillion dollars. I'm sure there are plenty of accounting tricks that will allow some slush funding of "TIA-like" activity.

  124. Oh my GAWD! by dbretton · · Score: 1

    This is horrible!! This will send the economy even further downward! How will the cities survive?? How will Washington survive?
    I certainly hope that the adult industry protests these actions!

    ...
    ..... .. oh , wait, T I A ?

    nevermind..

  125. 5 counts of felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Poindexter do something illegal! Or against a direct act of Congress (and the law) just so he and his cronies can get his way!

    Never!

    Oh, wait, he did get convicted of 5 counts of felony just to have them reversed on a technicality by a Republican appointed judge.

    At least people now give a shit alas for the people of Nicaragua good ole' Poiny never payed for his crimes against them or the rest of us. Hopefully Bezelbub has a spot reserved for him

  126. mwahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't ya just hate it when a little thing like public opinion buggers your plans for world domination?

  127. PUH-LEEEEASE! by jhylkema · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tell me you're not that naive. Until 1997, we didn't even know the how much was being spent on inteligence. It took a FOIA lawsuit by the Federation of American Scientists to get the CIA to release the "black budget" figure. The CIA then announced the figure for 1997 - $26.6 billion (yes, billion with a "b.") The FAS then forced the release of the 1998 aggregate intelligence figure - $26.7 billion.

    Anybody who knows anything about government budgeting will know this figure is a lie. Most federal programs get an automatic 10% annual budget increase. Any increase of less than 10% is called a "cut" (remember the mid-90s Democrat Goebbels-worthy "Medicare cuts" campaign? Same thing.) Had the CIA's budget only increased by $0.1 billion, we would have heard a hue and cry about the intelligence budget being "cut."

    The point is, they're lying about the amount of the budget even when a court ordered its release. Having been given essentially a blank check, who says they won't (or haven't) implemented TIA already via the "black budget"?

  128. Including Comp TIA? by knifeyspooney · · Score: 1

    This will make my Network+ cert worth even less!

  129. FIRST POST FOR GNAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Important Stuff:
    • Please try to keep posts on topic.
    • Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
    • Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    • Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    • Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
    • Fuck Michael, CmdrTaco or any other Slashbot up the ass. They love it.