Slashdot Mirror


New Linux PVR Box

An anonymous reader points to this product from Interact-TV, known as Telly, writing "Cool little box. PVR, stores photos, burns VCDs or DVDs (if you get a DVD burner), serves up stored content on your home network, nice gui, works with some satellite and digital cable boxes, 2.4.18 kernel. Freevo or mythTV can do about the same thing but this one is ready out of the box."

319 comments

  1. always room for more competition. by sweeney37 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now that I have a TiVo I could never give it up. But the fact this offers network connectivity, 5.1 digital out, and composite video is quite impressive. The price may seem a little steep, but a new TiVo with a lifetime subscription is about 650-700, but this box is subscription free.

    The real question is the interface going to be able to compete with TiVo? The ability to do season-passes are (IMO) what will make it or break it.

    Mike

    1. Re:always room for more competition. by jj00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to agree with the TiVo comment. I have DirecTV TiVo, and I simply love the interface. I only wish that it could use that interface to play DVDs (10 second replay, progress indicator, remote).

      Another DVR would have to go a long way to pull me away.

    2. Re:always room for more competition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the fact this offers network connectivity

      As does TiVo series 2.

      composite video is quite impressive

      composite == bad (RCA-style cable)
      component == good (HDTV cables)

      It doesn't do HDTV, so it doesn't have component out.

      I love my TiVo, but right now I am using my timewarner dvr. Costs $7 a month to rent, stores about 30 hours of video, 5.1 sound, integrated with their digital cable service, has dual tuners like DirecTiVo, PIP done by the device, etc... If it could record HD, it would be complete.

    3. Re:always room for more competition. by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Informative

      have you seen the tivo home media option? you plug it into your network, then you have access to your MP3 collection to be available to your stereo, you have access to your photos through your TV, if you have multiple tivo's you have access to the programming sotred on the other tivo's. there is one more thing it lets you do but I am at a loss as to what it is.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:always room for more competition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      composite == bad (RCA-style cable)
      component == good (HDTV cables)


      damnit, I always get those confused.

      Mike

    5. Re:always room for more competition. by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Easy to remember...

      Composite: Color and lumanence Composited (i.e. smashed) together in the same signal. If it's smashed together, it's hard to take apart resulting in quality loss.

      Component: Color and lumanence kept as seperate Components. Not smashed means there's no quality loss (or at least less).

      Just for the record, Component != HDTV. HDTV may be delivered via component signal, however analog and standard def digital can also be delivered via component (ala S-Video, SDI).

      Interestingly enough, there is composite digital video as well (D2) which is loads better than composite analog (although probabaly not used much anymore). However you still get quality loss after many generations of copying.

    6. Re:always room for more competition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, nope! You get composite out OR 5.1 digital! For some dumb reason they've used the same connector for both and you can only watch a film on your TV (unless you have s-video in) in stereo.

      Wouldn't touch this POC with a bargepole personally.

    7. Re:always room for more competition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Composite video is nothing to brag about. I think you are confusing it with component video.

      From lowest to highest video quality it goes:

      Coax
      Composite (standard yellow RCA plug)
      S-Video
      Component (three video connectors)

    8. Re:always room for more competition. by Xesdeeni · · Score: 1

      Technically, s-video is between composite and component. S-video provides the luminance by itself, but the two color components are mixed:

      Composite: 1-wire
      S-video: 2-wire
      Component: 3-wire

      SDI is a serial digital interface, that provides a digital version of component.

      Xesdeeni

    9. Re:always room for more competition. by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 1

      Right, should have added Y, Cr, Cb (Y/RY/BY) or straight up RGB to the list...

    10. Re:always room for more competition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the European RGB SCART - separate red/green/blue, with separate composite h/v sync (and they really are easy to separate, being in the region of 15-18Khz and 50-60Hz). Now that's good quality.

  2. price? by Comsn · · Score: 0

    Buy your Telly MC1000 Home Entertainment Server today for only $899.00

    ouch.

  3. doesn't support dvd writing *yet* by Palos · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the FAQ:
    Can you record and store TV programs and later burn them on a CD?
    Yes, Telly's Video Library supports an archiving feature. Eventually Telly will support DVD burning; the current MC1000 supports a CD-RW drive. You will be able to expand your unit to include a DVD-RW drive in the near future.

    Also you can't pause the live feed which is imo one of the best features of Tivo

    Is it possible to pause/rewind/skip-commercials of live TV broadcasts?
    Currently not on live TV broadcasts, but once recorded, you can skip 30-second intervals, pause, and rewind.

    1. Re:doesn't support dvd writing *yet* by Laur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since it has network connectivity couldn't you just copy the video to your main PC and burn a DVD there (assuming you have a DVD burner on your main PC)?

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
  4. Backup your DVDs? by sid+crimson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not today, but Telly's features don't stop. We will always push the envelope, enhancing features and adding new Telly capabiltities... and being able to make personal use copies of DVDs is on the list!


    If they push the envelope like they claim they will, this will be one excellent box. At $899.00, it's pricey for all but the serious buyers... however it's tough to come in cheaper for a do-it-yourself solution.

    -sid
    1. Re:Backup your DVDs? by Dachannien · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am at about $500, plus a bit of blood/sweat/tears, for mine. Admittedly, the video card was one I had lying around (an old TNT2 with a broken GPU fan that is still holding up nicely).

      Still, the biggest thing holding back MythTV and Freevo is the periodic changes made to the TV listings (the most recent one involved me making manual database changes to get it to change the channel when recording). Until a free, low-bandwidth solution to TV listings is devised (good luck there), this will always be a problem.

  5. Price prohibitive by pheared · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Buy your Telly MC1000 Home Entertainment Server today for only $899.00

    Hell, pick up three or four.

    Until these things cost the same as a VCR I couldn't possibly justify paying the price.

    Of course, I am just about to justify the price of cable, so I guess I'm already a step behind most couch jockeys. It's just that the return of Ren and Stimpy is such an enticing reason to get cable.

    1. Re:Price prohibitive by pheared · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah I heard roughly the same description from a friend of mine. I'm still so deprived of R&S that it may still be worth it.

      That, and broadcast is getting to be intolerable around here.

    2. Re:Price prohibitive by evilviper · · Score: 1, Funny
      Until these things cost the same as a VCR I couldn't possibly justify paying the price.

      Well, since VCRs cost $40, have fun waiting. Other people on this planet are far more realistic...

      Personally, I wouldn't get it until it gets some more features, and the price drops to about 1/3rd the price, but at least that's a realistic possibility.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Price prohibitive by pheared · · Score: 1

      Realistic, but well not with respect to their priorities?

      This device that costs 900 dollars that we are talking about records what's on your TV right?

      Just seems like a waste of money at this point. Even at 1/3 of the cost it's just an affordable waste of money.

    4. Re:Price prohibitive by dissy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly, I can confirm the horidness of the new R&S shows.
      I am a huge fan of the show. I literally have every single show on VHS tape (Working on encoding them to mpeg) from Nick when they were on in 1991-93.

      I tivo'ed the three new shows, but could only stand to watch half of 'onward and upward', the first of the new series.

      There was a huge breakup between the origonal writter and the 'new' writters after the first season, and it hasnt been the same since. Atleast in 1992 when they took the show away from John K, they made more shows out of greed and wanted the show to make them more money. Of course they failed because the writters sucked and totally missed the point. My theroy is they are only bringing the show back to ruin it publically and embarass John K.

      Its not even a matter of 'growing up' either, as I pulled out the first season and rewatched a few shows to make sure I still found it funny, which I do.
      These new releases really are that bad.

      I am probably going to keep the new shows, simply so i can continue to say i have all of them in my collection, but I will never allow the new ones to be played around me again.

      I'm sorry to be the rain on your parade, but I can honestly say seeing the new shows has ruined my love for R&S. I just dont want to see the same fate become of others. Keep the good memorys :)

    5. Re:Price prohibitive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can not agree with this more. I used to love Ren & Stimpy probably way too much, but the new ones aren't funny weird, they're asshole tighteningly creepy weird. Although, Adult Swim on the cartoon network is worth cable. I don't ever watch it, but I tape it every night and watch it the next day. Probably makes me the perfect candidate for a box like this one, but I'd rather do it myself and get some knowledge out of it. In fact, it's on my list of things to do, just too far down to ever get done.

    6. Re:Price prohibitive by pheared · · Score: 1

      That really is disappointing. I too had most of the originals on VHS. Ah, John K's classic episodes.

    7. Re:Price prohibitive by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful
      we are talking about records what's on your TV right?

      No, we are talking about digitizing any analog video source... Got a million VHS tapes? Hook your VCR up to this baby, and make them all into VCDs that will be small, cheap, easy to backup, and playable on any DVD player (or computer). Or, instead, maybe you just want to push the video file to your computer over the network. Maybe you want to convert your home movies into VCD/SVCDs. Or, maybe you just like Futurama, and want to keep it on a medium that isn't a huge hassle to deal with (everyone knows how horrible VHS tapes are, few know how easy digital is to work with)

      Even at 1/3 of the cost it's just an affordable waste of money.

      At $300, it would be slightly more expensive than the computer system I bought with the TV-tuner card I bought to perform the same tasks, but with this, it'll have a good interface, wouldn't have taken the long setup time, and would certainly be quieter, cooler, use up less power, etc.

      If you don't want/need the functionality, that's fine, but don't trash it just because you don't want it.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  6. Telly� by Blue+Stone · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Telly?

    Bad choice for a trademarked name?
    Here in the UK, "telly" is the generic term for television.

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    1. Re:Telly� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Telly?

      Bad choice for a trademarked name?
      Here in the UK, "telly" is the generic term for television.


      Windows?

      Bad choice for a trademarked name? Sure.

    2. Re:Telly� by kawika · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here in the States, middle-aged nerds like me think of England mostly in terms of Monty Python. When I heard the name and saw it's Linux based, I immediately thought of the "There's a penguin on the telly" sketch. In this case, there's a penguin IN the Telly!

    3. Re:Telly� by gvonk · · Score: 1

      Bollocks, don't be daft, guv'na!

      Just bugger it for a game of soldiers and Bob's your uncle, no more Telly!

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    4. Re:Telly� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Why do you think that Micro$oft lost the Lindows case? Why do you think that the name is "Windows 95", "Windows 2000", "Windows XP" etc, and not "windows" (version 95), "windows" (version 2000), "windows" (version XP) ?

    5. Re:Telly� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please do not attempt to do any form of Englishness in the future. You come across as some sort of Dick Van Dyke on acid.

    6. Re:Telly� by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aksherly I could use 'Windows' as often as I like in my GUI product. 'Rich's Windows' for example. Or even, 'X Windows.' It's not the 'Windows' - it's the 'Microsoft Windows' which is TM'd.

      Therefore 'Telly' is not uniquely trademark-able. 'Interact Telly,' however, is.

      (FYI 'Telly' - a contraction of 'Television' - has been in use in UK common language (a quick read of the Oxford English Dictionary will confirm this) since the device was invented here in the 30s.)

  7. You'll pry my TiVo out of my cold dead hands... by rtphokie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually my DirecTiVo. Beautiful digital signal from the bird so high in the sky straight to disk. No recompresssion. Far higher quality than this or any other PVR (other than DishNetwork's PVR).

    1. Re:You'll pry my TiVo out of my cold dead hands... by laing · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm curious about the bugs I've seen in my DirecTiVo and I'm wondering if anyone else has seen them too. The unit is a new HNS HDVR2.
      1) When turning on the unit and going straight to the "now playing" list, when you play something, there is no audio. To get audio, you must go to "live tv" and then back to your show on the playlist.
      2) When using the fast-forward (or the skip 30) features, the audio will drop out for a few seconds sometime after you resume playing at normal speed. It seems to happen every time and only mutes the sound for about 2 or 3 seconds.
      3) Sometimes while scrolling through the "now playing list" the unit will hang. It will continue to queue up all the buttons you press but will not respond to any of them for 10 to 15 seconds.
      4) The "please wait" screen seems to stay on the screen for a very very long time. Sometimes it's there for 30 seconds or more.
      5) Not so much a bug as a but a lack of features. How do you find the remaining recording capacity? (You don't!)
      How do you sort the "now playing" list by something other than the date recorded? (You don't!)
      These problems make the unit very annoying to use.

    2. Re:You'll pry my TiVo out of my cold dead hands... by shepd · · Score: 2, Informative

      >2) When using the fast-forward (or the skip 30) features, the audio will drop out for a few seconds sometime after you resume playing at normal speed. It seems to happen every time and only mutes the sound for about 2 or 3 seconds.

      The TiVo is probably searching for the next GOP, audio frame, or perhaps I frame. I suppose it could move backwards and compute where to cut the video, but that'd be a pain, and why bother? This is a problem inherent in all MPEG video.

      With the skip 30 feature, it should just skip to the nearest GOP, but that wouldn't be exactly as advertised.

      >3) Sometimes while scrolling through the "now playing list" the unit will hang. It will continue to queue up all the buttons you press but will not respond to any of them for 10 to 15 seconds.

      This seems to be common to a lot of EPGs on North American receivers. If it's like any of the others I've seen, a fixed firmware (or in your case, software) will be sent down eventually. Seems they don't expect users to "abuse" the guide. ;-)

      It's probably having trouble downloading the latest info and paging through it at the same time.

      >How do you find the remaining recording capacity? (You don't!)

      If it's recording the feeds straight from DBS, it's pretty much impossible (they change the rate on the fly). Although, the rate is usually within the range of 1 mbps to 4.5 mbps. That doesn't really help all that much, though... ("Is it 2 hours or 9 hours I have left?")

      Although I don't own such a unit, these are just edumacated guesses.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:You'll pry my TiVo out of my cold dead hands... by topham · · Score: 1

      The audio problem described is actually a recently introduced bug. Even then, it isn't 2-3 seconds. it is probably less than 1 second (atleast for me). Some cable boxes take longer to synch the sound/video and the tivo can sometimes exagerate it; this only occurs when changing channels though.

    4. Re:You'll pry my TiVo out of my cold dead hands... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Far higher quality than this or any other PVR

      Add the Explorer 8000 from Scientific America, which integrates with my timewarner digital service, no recompression here either, and 5.1 dolby sound is recorded and played out as well... just needs HD support.

    5. Re:You'll pry my TiVo out of my cold dead hands... by MBCook · · Score: 1
      You should know that I just got a DirecTiVo 5 days ago and I LOVE the thing. I'm ready to start saying that "...out of my cold dead hands" line. That said, I've expiranced NONE of these issues and I haven't heard of anyone with the box I have having any of these issues. I have a Phillips DVR-7000. From what I've heard, other than the faceplate having a different layout, it's IDENTICLE to the HDVR2. That said, I haven't had a single problem and I love it. My only compliant is that when editing the Season Pass list it can take quite a few seconds to refigure things out after rearranging them, but seeing as I have over 50 seasons passes, I don't blame it (considdering the processor isn't very fast). I love the unit. I bought it specifically because I had heard of the problems you have, and if you're worried just get the Phillips unit, because I haven't seen any reports of problem on the TiVo Community Forum.

      PS: As for sorting the "now playing" list, my brother has a stand alone TiVo that let's you do that, but he has software version 4.0, so I'm guessing us DirecTiVo users will get it in the next software version update.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:You'll pry my TiVo out of my cold dead hands... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Far higher quality than this or any other PVR (other than DishNetwork's PVR).


      Gee, you mean this thing can't possibly compete with an entirely different type of device? What a shocker!

      Your DirecTivo is never going to replace my refrigerator!
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:You'll pry my TiVo out of my cold dead hands... by Fofer · · Score: 1

      To sort the Now Playing list, hit these button on the remote, in this order:

      Slow-mo ("S")
      Zero ("0")
      Record ("R")
      Thumbs-Up ("T")

      You'll then get a new option at the bottom...

      yes it works in DirecTiVo as well.

    8. Re:You'll pry my TiVo out of my cold dead hands... by laing · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU!
      I have reviewed the "hacks" (it's where I found the "enable 30 second skip" feature) but never saw this one. When enabled as described above, there are 3 sorting options: 1) Sort by date recorded (the default). 2) Sort by expiration date. 3) Sort alphabetically (just what I wanted).

  8. Okay ... NO by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Funny
    $899???

    Hell I can build an "almost" top of the line PC for that. The software doesn't look all that impressive and it is still a PC that doesn't look like an entertainment center applaince. Reading the specs of a VIA C3 sub 1 GHz processor with 256 megs of 2100 Ram. This thing is a $200 PC for almost a grand.

    But it runs linux, wait no, that's free.

    Seems like quite the not good deal ...

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Okay ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      running linux is not free!

      unless you call all the man-hours making it run on the machine worthless.

    2. Re:Okay ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, all the man-hours are in learning linux, not using it as parent suggests. Once you have your shit together it's pretty easy.

    3. Re:Okay ... NO by kawika · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have not priced out the components being used. It's a Coolermaster aluminum case for one thing, and includes a very nice wireless mouse and keyboard. So it is NOT a "$200 PC" by any means. The mobo/CPU and TV/video card probably cost that much, then you have to add an 80GB drive and DVD/CD-RW combo drive. And although it does run Linux they have their own (closed-source) software on top of that.

      However, I have to agree that it does seem very expensive if you value your time at $0/hr and would prefer to build all the hardware and write/install the software yourself from scratch. At the volumes they are producing they are not getting any better prices than you would if you bought the components yourself.

      What I wonder about is how this box would stack up compared to the Pioneer/TiVo boxes annnounced a few weeks ago that were supposed to sell for about $1,000. Those had DVD burning built in, the Telly is promising it as a future enhancement.

    4. Re:Okay ... NO by Laur · · Score: 1

      Well, I think this would look just fine next to a TV and stereo, certainly better then a generic white box. Not too sure about the wireless keyboard, I wonder how often you actually have to use that. A whole keyboard would look pretty silly sitting on the coffee table all the time.

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    5. Re:Okay ... NO by evilviper · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The software doesn't look all that impressive

      That's quite relative. It might not sound impressive, but that's probably because you've never attempted to get a Linux box working as a PVR... It might not be software that requires a lot of effort for a programmer to create, but since nothing like it exists in the Open Source world, it is somewhat impressive.

      MythTV looks like a good start, but the effort required to get it working is significant, and it doesn't do anything BUT timeshift and record. It can't playback your DVD, VCDs, SVCDs, or Divx CDs, it can't save your recorded shows to CD/DVD, it can't playback music or display images, etc... Once MythTV/Freevo gets all these features, then this current software won't be that impressive. For now, since there is nothing else out there like it, it certainly is impresive.

      Take a look at Tivo. People are paying truckloads of money for boxes without half the features this thing has. Admitedly, this is missing a couple features Tivo has, but I believe that could be easily fixed.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Okay ... NO by Dark_Nova · · Score: 5, Informative

      MythTV looks like a good start, but the effort required to get it working is significant, and it doesn't do anything BUT timeshift and record. It can't playback your DVD, VCDs, SVCDs, or Divx CDs, it can't save your recorded shows to CD/DVD, it can't playback music or display images, etc... Once MythTV/Freevo gets all these features, then this current software won't be that impressive.


      MythTV has most of these features as add-on modules. MythTV's modular design means that there are an ever-growing number of modules that can be used to extend it's already rich feature-set.

    7. Re:Okay ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh i dont know wath you are talking about perhaps you where ironic. I installed mythtv and it can
      play all your divx,svcd and xvid it even fetches all the info about your movies from imdb. there is a hack to get it to play dvds as well. it can also play all your music and it can fetch wether information for your area and you can even play all your nes snes roms :)

    8. Re:Okay ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the real man hours are in *writing* linux, and I am grateful to all the code hackers out there who make it possible!

    9. Re:Okay ... NO by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Alright, it has more functionality than I knew about, but still doesn't have everything this does. Some of the features myth doesn't seem to have (like burning to CD/DVD) are very very significant/important. MythTV may have those eventually, but not yet, and likely not for some time.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:Okay ... NO by atrus · · Score: 3, Informative

      MythTV actually has very mature modules that let you play your music library, your DivX file library, check the weather, browse images. Removeable media support (Playback & reading) is absent.

    11. Re:Okay ... NO by tfoss · · Score: 4, Informative
      MythTV looks like a good start, but the effort required to get it working is significant, and it doesn't do anything BUT timeshift and record. It can't playback your DVD, VCDs, SVCDs, or Divx CDs, it can't save your recorded shows to CD/DVD, it can't playback music or display images, etc... Once MythTV/Freevo gets all these features, then this current software won't be that impressive. For now, since there is nothing else out there like it, it certainly is impresive.

      Um, really?

      • Rip, categorize, play, and visualize MP3/Ogg/FLAC/CD Audio files. (FLAC and Vorbis encoding only). Create complex playlists (and playlists containing playlists) through a simple UI.
      • An image viewer/slideshow application.
      • A generic video player module, with automatic metadata lookups.

      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    12. Re:Okay ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever. it's a linux box. worst case scenerio, you have to ssh into it and manually burn to cd/dvd. whoop-de-do. fully automating that so you can burn to cd from the pretty on screen menu should be fairly trivial. i give them six months.

    13. Re:Okay ... NO by ziggy_zero · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you want to build your own, here's what you can use to get a close approximation to the Telly MC1000:

      Cooler Master ATC-620C-BX1 (Black) Desktop Case - 108
      Foxconn Allied MicroATX 200W Power Supply - 21
      VIA Motherboard and Integrated 1GHz Nehemiah CPU EPIA-M10000 - 178
      Western Digital "Special Edition" 80GB Hard drive - 92
      Crucial 256MB PC2100 DDR SDRAM - 42
      Lite-On 48x24x48x16 DVD-ROM/CD-RW Drive (Black) - 65
      I guess you'll have to find a TV Tuner card that's compatible with Linux, and can go in a PCI slot - 100?
      I can't find that wireless keyboard, I know I've seen it on NewEgg before though, I don't think it's more than 50
      Linux - free
      Freevo or MythTV - free
      Cables and adapters - 20

      Total cost: ~$680

      So, if you wanted to save yourself some money, I guess you could do that. Needless to say, you won't get a fancy User's Manual or remote control (unless you manage to get a TV Tuner card with one).

      Some notes:
      You could not use the VIA integrated mobo/proc thing, and use a MicroATX motherboard and an AMD processor, and use an AGP TV Tuner card.

      All of the prices (unless I was guessing) came from NewEgg.com.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    14. Re:Okay ... NO by mr.+methane · · Score: 5, Funny

      A while ago I might have said the same thing.. but to a lot of people, time is more valuable. I've had a PVR since they were pretty new (3 years+?) and even though I paid something like $699 for it, I consider it a terrific buy.

      I figure I watch 10 hours of TV a week. Probably 7 hours are stations with commercials. 20 minutes per hour X 7 hours, that's 2 hours and 20 minutes a week I *don't* spend watching tampax ads.

      In other words, in last three years, I've avoided wasting 400 hours on commercials. I figure my time is worth about $50 an hour, so that's $20k in "free time" I've had available to do other things.

      Valuable things.

      Like posting rants on slashdot.

    15. Re:Okay ... NO by Groote+Ka · · Score: 1

      You missed the 5.1 sound stuff

    16. Re:Okay ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the motherboard. Dolby 5.1 is a single point item in the list these days.

    17. Re:Okay ... NO by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1


      Boy, rather negative, aren't we? The Myth developers are quick. The project was only started 14 months ago for crying out loud!

      I love my Myth box. timeshifting, recording while I'm at work, playing my music library, playing videos, game emulation, photo gallery, weather module... it has everything!

      --
      --- witty signature
    18. Re:Okay ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >there are an ever-growing number of modules ...

      How about an ever growing quality of user interface and end user documentation?

      Open source usually means 'no or almost no usuable documentation'

    19. Re:Okay ... NO by Archie+Steel · · Score: 1

      Uh, since this is a Consumer Electronics component, I can only assume that there are NO man-hours required to make the machine run. In other words, your lame attempt at trolling was misdirected in this case.

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    20. Re:Okay ... NO by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, you are about the 50th person to point that out... It's amazing how few people read other replies before they reply. Even more surprising is that you got moderated up, rather than the others.

      See my response (posted an hour before you even asked the question) here: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=71232&cid=6449 709

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    21. Re:Okay ... NO by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I don't care how long it will take to get those features. They aren't available now, and that was the very point.

      This new box HAS (has meaning presently, not might come in the near future) lots of major features that Myth can't hope to match.

      Someday, when Myth does have those features, then you can say the software on this box isn't anything special.

      it has everything!

      No, it's missing quite a bit... Quite a few features I'm trying to tie together with giant shell scripts, mplayer, cdrecord, avidemux, et al. It's still missing some very very significant features. Frankly, I don't know why they weren't the first things developed after recording TV shows worked.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:Okay ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MythTV has good documentation (better than most commercial products) and an ever-improving user interface. Just look at the amazing new Visor theme for evidence of teh UI work that is being done.

  9. Umm did you catch the price? by geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This thing is a small fortune at 900$ plus tax. How do they expect to compete with that kind of barrier to entry? How do they justify that price when everything else I've seen is half that or less in the case of Tivo?

    I'll pass thanks.

  10. Cool.. but my Xbox does that as well... by mianbao · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool.. but my Xbox does that as well...

    1. Re:Cool.. but my Xbox does that as well... by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      Hey man, if you've managed to attach a TV Tuner to your Xbox so it can function as PVR, please share the details :)

    2. Re:Cool.. but my Xbox does that as well... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Does Linux have drivers for USB TV Tuners? On LinuxTag last weekend I realized how much of just an ordinary PC the XBox was, when Debian running on it managed to write data into a USB memory keychain (plugged into the controller slot using a simple adapter). So, if Linux has drivers for the tuner, it should work on the Xbox..

      Oops but I don't think they've managed to run Xfree on Xbox yet, so that's another thing you have to solve.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    3. Re:Cool.. but my Xbox does that as well... by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      > Oops but I don't think they've managed to run Xfree on Xbox
      > yet, so that's another thing you have to solve.

      You're quite mistaken. The normal nv (open source nVidia driver) provides accelerated 2D on X-Box.

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    4. Re:Cool.. but my Xbox does that as well... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Oh. Do you know if the closed-source driver run on the Xbox?

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    5. Re:Cool.. but my Xbox does that as well... by UltimateZer0 · · Score: 1

      Xbox?!?!?! Son, you have fallen under the control a corporate slave-driver! Free yourself of that Microsoft corruption -- do not be a mindless MS Drone!!! Before you know it, you'll be thrown out and replaced by MS Drone XP!!! How will you feel then?

      --

      --- I'm going to get a score of -1 for this post because the mods are fuckers.

    6. Re:Cool.. but my Xbox does that as well... by mr3038 · · Score: 1
      Does Linux have drivers for USB TV Tuners?

      If you want any quality you can forget the USB thingies or at least low costs. Say we want to capture NTSC with full quality: the resolution is 640x480 and it takes about 2 bytes per pixel (YUV 4:2:0 color mode commonly used in DVDs). That's 640x480x2x30 bytes = ~18MB per second or 140Mbps. Unless the USB thingy compresses the incoming stream to MPEG2 by itself that isn't going to fly and having a good MPEG2 encoder in a USB device is going to be quite expensive or the resulting MPEG2 stream has highly probably poor quality.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  11. $899 are you out of your mind? by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 1

    The price seems a bit steep, with high end PVRs coming in a lot cheaper...

    Maybe good for the enthusiast or rich man, doesn't seem like an average joe would pay $899 for a "linux tivo" (In their eyes)

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  12. Is it quiet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I can't find anything on the marketing overview page about it being quiet or not. You'd think they would trumpet, so to speak, the fact if it were a quiet box.

  13. Looks to me like its an all-around analog DVR by ultrapenguin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The specs include a TV tuner and analog S-Video/Composite inputs. $899 is an OK price to pay for an integrated box, but most people (i dunno, I do) probably have enough parts laying around to make something exactly like this out of common parts.

    And, analog mpeg-2 capture isn't exactly something to be proud of. Hardware mpeg2 encoder cards can be picked up for $100 these days, and this "DVR" doesn't offer any of the advanced features such as skipping during live shows, etc, so why pay more for almost standard PC hardware?

    Now if this supported hdtv recording via firewire, or direct mpeg2 recording off dish network or whatever is today's digital satellite system, that would make it worth the money.

    Analog mpeg2 DVRs dont impress me anymore, too much quality loss, not enough features to make me switch from using a normal PC for similar capture tasks.

    1. Re:Looks to me like its an all-around analog DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron. What about "analog input" has you confused?

    2. Re:Looks to me like its an all-around analog DVR by evilviper · · Score: 1
      And, analog mpeg-2 capture isn't exactly something to be proud of. Hardware mpeg2 encoder cards can be picked up for $100 these days

      What is this? Buzzword bingo? Would you mind explaining to me what "analong mpeg-2 capture" is?

      Since standard TV-signals are analog, anything you do would still be analog capture. You mention HDTV/Satellite, but if that's what you were talking about, why the mention of $100 hardware MPEG-2 encoder cards? If you were saying that software MPEG-2 capture isn't that impressive, I would have to differ. It may not be real impressive considering the prices on processors, but it is just as good as a hardware MPEG-2 encoder, but doing everything through software rather than hardware gives you a LOT more flexibility.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Looks to me like its an all-around analog DVR by ultrapenguin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as in I wouldn't buy this machine to capture ANALOG video out from my DIGITAL HDTV tuner just to re-encode it to MPEG2 inside Telly. I would rather just get a box that takes the original MPEG2 data out of the tuner via its firewire port and COPY that. Aka products like Tivo-DVB (or something, like that), any of HDTV HDD/DVD recording combos, etc. If I wanted to capture ANALOG video outputs, I would just buy a capture card for the PC. There are no HDTV capturing cards that take straight mpeg2ts stream from teh tuner as far as I know because the signal is filled with DRM technologies such as DTCP. And for the record, I don't have any analog TV in my house. I receive 10 channels of HDTV via satellite and about 100 channels of SDTV/MPEG2 through another satellite/provider. So naturally, if I wanted to record something from these DIGITAL sources, I wouldn't waste my money on a $899 ANALOG recorder.

    4. Re:Looks to me like its an all-around analog DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no HDTV capturing cards that take straight mpeg2ts stream from teh tuner as far as I know because the signal is filled with DRM technologies such as DTCP.

      There are... but you just don't know about them yet. And those of us who can, don't want to let out the secret, just yet... Most especially when it can be done for under $200...

      Be back here in a year or so...

    5. Re:Looks to me like its an all-around analog DVR by ultrapenguin · · Score: 1

      That take firewire mpeg2ts?
      Doubtful.
      As far as I know it's impossible to do unless the card connects as a "trusted DTCP device" to the tuner.
      Unless you know something I dont.

    6. Re:Looks to me like its an all-around analog DVR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Pierre....

  14. The Be All End All by felonious · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why hasn't a company come out with an adult version of the PVR?

    Name it the "Porn-O-Tron" or "Porn-O-Matic"

    Include a subscription business model with various channels of varying fetishes, etc. and market it as just that. Tie it all together and the customers will flood the place...ok bad pun but you get the idea.

    You could even tie in various adult products that plug into the box and someone on the other end could operate them for $19 a minute. Virtual Spanktravision might even be a better name or sub-brand as long as it doesn't canabalize the main brand.

    Porn is BIG business and why hasn't a visionary other than myself come up with this?

    --
    You aren't free to do anything, until you've lost everything.
    1. Re:The Be All End All by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      various channels

      ummm...a digital video recorder, or personal video recorder doesnt magically have its own shows..it just records shows that are already there...

      so how exactly could one be an "adult version"

      i know you were trolling but it wasnt even close....

    2. Re:The Be All End All by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      He's not trolling. It could be a webified, DRMified, One-Click TM, porn-downloading idiot-box for Joe Sixpack. You know MS is going to do it sooner or later; Linux might as well be first. Passwords and hard drive and everything to save your porn and keep it from the Mrs., no computer needed.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:The Be All End All by toddestan · · Score: 0

      You mean something like this?

    4. Re:The Be All End All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why oh why is this not a USB device? I mean I love my computer but I don't want to make love to my computer, that's just sick. :P

    5. Re:The Be All End All by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny
      Include a subscription business model with various channels of varying fetishes, etc. and market it as just that.

      Um... It's called the Internet?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    6. Re:The Be All End All by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Are you trolling, or do you just not understand what a PVR is for? What you are talking about is a Set Top Box combined with a subscription-based content delivery system.

      Or, you could just deliver the content over the WWW for little more than the cost of bandwidth.

      You can always just run a simple web store and sell video clips for low prices, I figure this is the next step in pornography.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:The Be All End All by Groote+Ka · · Score: 1
      Although you might intend to troll, your remark is insightful in a certain sense.

      The answer to your question is that none of the big CE companies wants to be associated with porn. But when an small company like interact can manage to bring this kind of a product to the market, why wouldn't a porn king be able to do so?

      combined with fu fme (or whatever it's called), this idea isn't that bad.

    8. Re:The Be All End All by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      Do you remember the Orgasmatron in Woody Allen's "Sleeper"?

      Miles Monroe: Perform sex? Uh, uh, I don't think I'm up to a performance, but I'll rehearse with you, if you like.

      Luna Schlosser: Okay. I just thought you might want to; they have a machine here.

      Miles Monroe: Machine?! I'm not getting into that thing. I, I'm strictly a hand operator; you know, I, I... I don't like anything with moving parts that are not my own.

  15. They used a coolermaster chassi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This one's really cool, I have planned to build my own system based on MythTV, and that's exactly the chassi I had in mind, it looks so HiFi.

    http://coolermaster.com/case/p620.htm

    1. Re:They used a coolermaster chassi by kawika · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is a very nice looking box, but it is BIG and most likely too noisy to put next to your TV if used with anything but the ITX boards. It's the size of the old desktop PC cases. There are two 5-inch and two 3-inch bays in the thing. If you fill it with peripherals it will generate way too much heat.

      The Hush looks like it would be much more compatible with an A/V stack, but notice the price and you'll see that the Telly isn't that far off price-wise. And the hush is "just" a PC with no PVR functionality set up on it!

    2. Re:They used a coolermaster chassi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, that sure is one sexy box!
      Looks like I might have to change my plans, there's even a spare horizontal pci-slot in that thing, I just hope it's not too tight for a decent TV-Tuner/PVR card.

    3. Re:They used a coolermaster chassi by evilviper · · Score: 1
      and most likely too noisy to put next to your TV

      Nice to see we are just making baseless assumptions now.

      In fact, according to the specs, it is running on a VIA C3 933MHz Processor (roughly equivalent to the processing power of a 450MHz Pentium/K-6) which gives off very little heat, hence requires very little cooling. It's quite possible that this could be a nearly silent machine. I know the 800MHz C3 system that I bought (and later returned because of crappy performance) was quieter than my VCR's motor when playing a tape... put it behind an entertainment system (glass) door and you should be all set.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:They used a coolermaster chassi by ChaezeWhiz · · Score: 1
      A case does not generate noise just by being big. The main reason I bought this case was because it looks like everything else in my AV rack, except for my silver DirecTivo. The main problem with most miniITX boxen, IMHO, is their shape. Its nice for portability, but not for 19" racks. I guess thats where the Hush box fit$$.

      The case is built to house a microATX board (I'm guessing a little rework to get ITX boards in there) and a full size ATX power supply. The extra drive bays give you an upgradable path and expandability (CD/DVD to CD/DVD copy, etc.)

      I dropped in a nforce2 mobo with a Zalman cooled 1.3 duron and it is quieter and cooler than my DirecTivo.

      --
      Heaven in a can
    5. Re:They used a coolermaster chassi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note also, that the Hush "box" still only has a 55W Power supply, which isn't enough to run a typical HW mpeg2 capture card.
      I know, I own such a setup (using hauppauge pvr-250) and the network adapter on the chipset fails, which is the first indication on the VIA board that there isn't enough power.

      All I can say is, if you want a Linux PVR solution, do NOT purchase a box from Hush Technologies as there simply isn't enough juice in those. Also stay clear of Hauppauge, as the drivers are real early (read sucky) at the moment.

      As I see it I could've spent my $1000 on this thingy instead of Hush and Hauppauge. Hauppauge is amongst the worst vendors when it comes to linux driver support. Some poor sodds have had to reverse stuff in order to attempt creating a driver (ivtv) which currently is a) very early on, b) not really usable and c) will always be of quality fitting reversed drivers, compared to official ones...

  16. Real reason why it's $899 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    • $75 for the hard drive
    • $25 for the chassis
    • $799 for the rights to use the name "Telly"!!

      Who loves ya Baby?

    1. Re:Real reason why it's $899 ... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      The $799 additional is for the Lawyers fees once the MPAA/RIAA realise this is a network device capable of serving out illicit copyrighted material to everyone in the house.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:Real reason why it's $899 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The case is actually $120 US if purchased from most online retailers.

    3. Re:Real reason why it's $899 ... by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      $75 for the hard drive

      $70 for the chassis

      $200 for the computery bits

      $50 for the keyboard and remote

      Coming up with a cruddy name and lackluster website to sell the system to the masses... priceless.

    4. Re:Real reason why it's $899 ... by jtrascap · · Score: 1

      Hmmm - "Cruddy website"...makes me suspicious (well, actaully, reading /. also makes me chronically suspicious)...

      For a legit company, with an expensive product, it *is* a really cruddy site - lots of small images that you can't see in detail, nothing but duplicate pages in the descriptions, bold-faced words when value is stressed too hard, and the PVR looks like a PShopped-bit of Onkyo stereo hardware. I could make this site in an hour or two if I had content (for which I would need a marketing weasel).

      But *IS* this really legit? I can think of a few examples recently of legit-looking sites advertising to a hungry market, not shipping product and then vanishing (think Macintosh clone)...

      What tipped it for me was the "backup DVDs" function - really, they're just ASKING for a lawsuit.

  17. Bets? by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone want to start a pool on how long this will last before the MPAA gets them shut down?

    I'll take a month...

    --
    Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  18. adopt early by sbszine · · Score: 1

    Anyone thinking of getting one should strike now before the lawsuits begin and the features are slowly removed or crippled.

    --

    Vino, gyno, and techno -Bruce Sterling

  19. Hmm... by kwiqsilver · · Score: 1

    $900 PVR, $50 TV card and cron...tough choice... Maybe in a few years when these things are a common appliance (and priced like today's VCRs).

    1. Re:Hmm... by jroysdon · · Score: 1


      People who state things like this just don't get what a TiVo-like device can do. Yeah, even your VCR can do the cron job thing, but who ever used a VCR to record shows (what a hassle, and what happens if no one puts your blank tape back in)?

      It's so much more than just a simple cron job. Being able to flag a show or type of show and have it automatically record what you like without you having to tell it the time/date and channel is what makes this sort of thing useful.

      My TiVo knows me so well that I never miss a SciFi mini-series, motorcycle race or soccer match that I've forgoteen to tell it to record. Of course, having 109 hours of space helps as well.

    2. Re:Hmm... by kwiqsilver · · Score: 1

      I know TiVo can do that. I just don't want it to.
      There are a few select shows that I want to watch. I have less than ten cron entries to record them.
      I don't want it to make decisions for me or suggest that I watch some other show.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tivo is only suppossed to record extra show when you have free space not used by real selections. real selections will override and replace suggestions if its out of space

  20. Re:Early GNAA Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Defined by our esteemed parent poster.

  21. PVR pricing needs work by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You can get network connectivity with a non-authorized ethernet card for Tivos. Do a google search, I think they run about 60 bucks. As far as composite out goes, maybe a video geek can help out here, but considering the source (cable/satellite) it may just be that the law of diminishing returns kicks in real hard after a point and its may not be worth it.

    I kinda dig the standard directivo. Dual tuners, S-Video out, etc. I'd much rather see a cheaper tivo that doesn't hurt the pocketbook too much than just more feature creep.

    From the website:

    >Buy your Telly MC1000 Home Entertainment Server today for only $899.00

    Err no thanks. Where's that $100 Tivo?

    1. Re:PVR pricing needs work by giberti · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tivo2 supports Ethernet. And with the new "Home Media Option" you can even listen to your MP3 collection and surf your digital photo library. Of course at an extra $99 (one time charge) also gives you the ability to add to your play lists remotely... but at $300 (lifetime subscription) + $350 (hardware) + $99 (home media) + $50 (usb 802.11b wireless) + $50 and up (cable bill monthly) why the hell do I drive a piece of crap car again?

      --

      AF-Design, web development.
    2. Re:PVR pricing needs work by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I'd much rather see a cheaper tivo that doesn't hurt the pocketbook too much than just more feature creep.

      So you'd rather save $50 than get one that allowed you to record your shows to DVDs? With that, you'd probably save money in the long-term, seeing how much cheaper DVD-Rs are than hard drive space (not to mention you'd save $80-100 not needing a seperate DVD player).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:PVR pricing needs work by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yep. I think the $99 price point is the magic number to keep the Tivo company going and help popularize the technology before the media companies drive Tivo out of the market with their own branded DVRs which will most likely have some sleeping DRM feature that will one day make that handy commercial skip useless or push ads or who knows what else.

      In fact my directivo was $129 at the time. The directv tuner was $60. So for double that I got a Tivo and have been very impressed with the technology since.

      A few people I know have echoed similiar statements "Yeah its awesome but I'm not dropping $250 on a kick-ass VCR." Neither would I.

    4. Re:PVR pricing needs work by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A few people I know have echoed similiar statements "Yeah its awesome but I'm not dropping $250 on a kick-ass VCR." Neither would I.

      My whole point was, if it had more significant features, people would be willing to get one. It can't really replace VCRs because there is no removable media, nothing you can remove from the unit, keep in storage, or pass on to a friend.

      In fact my directivo was $129 at the time. The directv tuner was $60.

      But that's not comparable to a standalone unit that has to do the encoding itself. First off, it's going to be a long time before prices drop that low (computers only recently reached the $200 price point, and Tivos are souped-up computers). Besides, even if they get the hardware down to $100, people are still paying a good deal of money to tivo every month, or spending something like $200 more up front on top of the $100 pricetag. Personally, paying $20/month for Tivo would nearly double my monthly TV expenses, and all for a unit that still can't hope to replace a single VCR...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:PVR pricing needs work by gvonk · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Come on, I paid $99 for a Tivo 18 months ago...

      There's no "Besides, even if they get the hardware down to $100" about it.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    6. Re:PVR pricing needs work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with your DirecTivo is that you have to use DirecTV service with it. Not everyone is a big fan of DirecTV and think's it's worth using the Devil's signal to have this particular Tivo. Something not tied to a monthly cost to Satan is appealing no matter what the initial price.

      Also note that because of the tie to DirecTV you're $220/Month. (According to DirecTV this is the Average per subscriber!) Not terribly worth it in the long run when compared against the ability to pick and choose a media provider at will.

    7. Re:PVR pricing needs work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Does a Tivo have a 80GB HDD?
      Can Tivo's HDD upgraded easily using standard components?
      Can Tivo fetch program information via XMLTV?

      This is like Linux vs MS issue. I rather pay real price of the hardware and have complete control rather than pay less and be at the mercy of some company.

    8. Re:PVR pricing needs work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang tight! If you don't already own a TiVo or have a Tivo-like device then it's obviously not at the top of your priorities. It's just a matter of time before your cable/dish provider starts rolling these out for a decent monthly charge.

      Time Warner is doing this in select markets already for 9.95/month. Too much you say? Put a sock in it. This is the direction that this product is heading. Either roll your own linux-based product or shell out 10 bucks more a month. Even if you could build a box that works as good for $250 (which I highly doubt) you could just pay the cable co $10 for the next two years and have trouble-free DVR, plus you never have to upgrade.

      Here's a link to the TW offering:

      http://www.timewarneraustin.com/services/cable_s er vices/dvr.asp

    9. Re:PVR pricing needs work by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      $220/mo? Let's see a link where DirecTV states that's the average.

      Also, get it? DirecTivo? Of course it's for DirecTV. You can get a basic Tivo that does not require satellite service.

      The benefit of getting a combo set that is designed for satellite is the image quality. You aren't going to get the same quality out of stand alone PVRs since there's an additional conversion on the signal to analog.

      I use Microsoft's UltimateTV service. It was the best deal at the time, considering it was the only unit on the market with dual tuners. Sadly, a telephone repair man destroyed the modem in it while doing work on my phone lines a few months ago. No more PPV. :(

      UltimateTV, even though it's M$, has no embedded ads. It's also not uncommon to power it up and have new features added with software updates.

    10. Re:PVR pricing needs work by supercargo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just had the "Tivo is just a souped-up VCR" discussion with a non-believer yesterday, except that it wasn't really worth discussing. Tivo is not just a better VCR, the program management bits make it a wholly different beast. Yes, you _can_ do everything Tivo does, manually with a VCR, but you never would, because it's a PITA.

      What was surprising, however, was that four other Tivo owners chimed in, giving glowing reports of how great their PVR is. I have never met a Tivo owner that was not a zealot for the technology--I defy you to find one.

      "...because there is no removable media..." This really isn't at all important.

      --
      -- "He is a being, so brilliant yet so corrupt, which, like a rotten mackerel by moonlight, stinks as it shines." -
    11. Re:PVR pricing needs work by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where's that $100 Tivo?

      Here it is.

      But it's $115.

    12. Re:PVR pricing needs work by KodaK · · Score: 1

      The benefit of getting a combo set that is designed for satellite is the image quality.

      I love my DirecTivo, but I have to interject here, have you seen the "quality" of the DirecTV broadcasts? Projected on my 42" toshiba almost everything looks like shit. I have to turn the sharpness way down to minimize the appearance of compression artifacts. This is not the fault of Tivo, but of DirecTV. It's almost worth it to buy two stand alone Tivos and hook them up to two DirecTV tuners, at least that way you can get the HMO and you're not stuck with a doorstop should you decide to leave the graces of the money hole in the sky.

      --
      --J(K) DOS is like Unix in exactly the same way that a pinto is like an aircraft carrier.
    13. Re:PVR pricing needs work by JordanArendt · · Score: 1

      Does a Tivo have a 80GB HDD?

      Mine has a 120GB.

      Can Tivo's HDD upgraded easily using standard components?

      Mine is a seagate 120GB 7200RPM drive I bought at ncix.com.

      Can Tivo fetch program information via XMLTV?
      Mine does. I have to, I'm a Canadian. I fetch with xmltv via zap2it.

      That said, if TiVo offered service in Canada, I's be all over it.

    14. Re:PVR pricing needs work by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      First off, it's going to be a long time before prices drop that low (computers only recently reached the $200 price point, and Tivos are souped-up computers)

      Er... you can buy a new 40 hour TiVo S2 for $199. It's not the $100 price point yet (although as people have pointed out, low end S1's are available for that much), but it's close. Yes, you'll need service still.

      Personally, paying $20/month for Tivo would nearly double my monthly TV expenses, and all for a unit that still can't hope to replace a single VCR

      It's not $20/month. It's $12.95/mo. Or you can get a lifetime subscription for $300 that's good until the box dies (which it's unlikely to do for a decade or so).

      As far as not replacing a VCR... uh... whatever. It does so much more than a VCR it's absurd. Comparing a TiVo to a VCR is about like comparing a Coleman camp stove to a top end Viking range. Yeah, there's a couple things the camp stove can do that the Viking can't, but even then it does a paltry job of it and there's so much more that the Viking range can do.

      In fact, the only thing I've used a VCR for in the past 2 years was to dump something off TiVo to give to a friend. I've often considered just removing the VCR entirely because it's unused. The VCR doesn't automatically record all the shows I want, has a small fraction of the storage of the TiVo, doesn't allow me to see what's recorded easily, or what's on easily, has horrible picture quality, lousy FF/REW capabilities, doesn't help at all with live TV, and requires far more attention than TiVo ever will.

      My brother-in-law used to do the VCR shuffle to record what he wanted for time shifting. Three VCRs, with tapes having to be replaced every day or two. He bought a couple of TiVos and can't imagine ever going back to his VCR now.

    15. Re:PVR pricing needs work by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1
      Where's that $100 Tivo? Here it is. But it's $115.
      I think you mistyped the link, Here's the correct one

      HTH, HAND

      --
    16. Re:PVR pricing needs work by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      No, I did not try to link to shit-bay. I can't stand that fucking site.

      My link was to $115 factory refurb Series 1 Tivo units. Not busted trash that sells for *WAY* more than it's worth to idiots on shit-bay...

    17. Re:PVR pricing needs work by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      And...I believe the non-modchip hack is now working for the Tivo series 2...so, you can mod it not only to increase record time (new HD), but, also for video extraction....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:PVR pricing needs work by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      The problem with that argument is this:

      It *really* doesn't matter what the Tivo *IS*. It matters what potential consumers *see it as*. And that is a souped up VCR.

      You and I can agree all day long that it is so much more than that, but in my very not scientific survey of (semi-tech) people in my office, when asked "what is a Tivo?" 8 out of 10 people said "A new kind of VCR". One actually had a Tivo, and raved about all its features, although they have a tech-aware husband who has tons of money and loves to buy new gadgets. The other one said "You mean TeeVee?".

      I realise that this is subjective of my work place, but I believe that it is not too far off the public in general. Most people see it as a souped up VCR. And it is *really* hard for most people to see $200 more value in a souped up VCR, when there is a $50 tape VCR that fulfills all the needs they have from a VCR *now*.

      Before you argue, let me clarify. Yes, I know that a Tivo does *SO* much more than a VCR. Easily. And if that person got a Tivo, there are things they just couldn't live without. But they don't know that now, and they usually can't see it until they have it in their home for a month or so. And that is why I make my point:

      People see a Tivo as a souped up VCR. They do not see it as worth the $200 more than the $50 VCR they can get at their local WalMart, and will not see it as more until either a) some tech aware friend explains the difference, b) they get one and find out for themselves, or c) Tivo does a whole hell of a lot more educational advertisement.

      Joe six-pack is not interested, thankyou very much.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    19. Re:PVR pricing needs work by cmoney · · Score: 1

      I'm one. I had TiVo years ago. Cancelled it 1 year ago after I started recording programs on my computer.

      Basically my TV watching habits changed. I started watching TV on the treadmill instead of my bedroom (where the TiVo is) so I needed a way to watch down there instead. I've now got my main computer recording shows and an old computer down with my treadmill to stream the shows to.

      The monthly fee is what finally did me in for cancelling TiVo service though. It was convenient to have the updated scheduling, but that's worthless for things that aren't updated the night before anyway. Season pass for me really wasn't much more than "record every Thursday night 7:58pm to 8:35pm" and others.

    20. Re:PVR pricing needs work by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Just as a note, you can replace the HD with little difficulty at all. It does not require any modding of the TiVo, and the method for doing it is quite easy. If you're comfy with opening up your PC, you can replace the HD in your TiVo.

      I hadn't heard that the S2 SA's had been hacked though, so I went and checked into it... sure enough, it's doable now, even with 4.0 software. Very cool. It's certainly not the most straightforward thing in the world, but it's laid out well. No, I'm not going to link to the sites... I don't want anyone getting in trouble, and /. has a bit higher visibility than some of the hacking sites. I stopped reading the TiVo Underground on the semi-official boards, so I don't know if it's made it there. Last time a S2 hack made it there it got shut down, and quickly.

      I don't have any plans on hacking my S2's at this point though... between standard TiVo functionality and HMO they do pretty much all I'd want. I don't particularly need video extraction... uploading external video (like camcorder data) is another matter, but I'll look into that when I feel the need.

    21. Re:PVR pricing needs work by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      People that haven't used a TiVo might well dismiss it as a kick-ass VCR and not be willing to pay too much for one.

      For me, I only discovered exactly how much VCR hassle I was avoiding only after I bought a TiVo.

      Time shifting is an indispensible part of life for people with hectic schedules.

      Programming the VCR for each show, explicitly putting in the time, with pre and post slop intervals to account for inaccuracies, pre-tuning the satellite receiver to the one and only right channel, watching crappy VHS tapes, rewinding said tapes, shoving many unlabeled "temporary" tapes in and out of the VCR, were all so much hassle that has been almost eliminated by buying a TiVo.

      Oh, fast-forwarding through commercials is much easier than when using VHS tapes.

      And it was definitely worthwhile installing 100 GB IDE drives into the unit in place of the paltry 20 GB drives.

      I could never go back to an analog VCR.

      Most people underestimate the value of the TiVo until they own one.

      But network connectivity and the ability to archive to DVD-R would be real plusses. I wouldn't even need the latter if network connectivity were good and I could store a couple TB of shows on a big fileserver.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    22. Re:PVR pricing needs work by supercargo · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. In fact, at lunch today someone suggested that Tivo work with Best Buy or some such and offer a "two month trial Tivo" for the unindoctrinated. You throw down $200 deposit and walk out with a Tivo to use, and if you decide to keep it you can return the borrowed one for a new model any time within the trial period.

      It only takes a little exposure to get hooked. It might even prevent Tivo from falling into bankruptcy ;).

      --
      -- "He is a being, so brilliant yet so corrupt, which, like a rotten mackerel by moonlight, stinks as it shines." -
    23. Re:PVR pricing needs work by supercargo · · Score: 1

      No you're not ;). While I genuinely like the Tivo interface (and paid the fee up front, so I'm not affected by the monthly charges), I really meant to speak to the "PVR is just a souped up VCR" debate, which really is no debate at all, just one side is horribly ill-informed.

      If I didn't own a Tivo, I'd probably be working on getting MythTV running...

      --
      -- "He is a being, so brilliant yet so corrupt, which, like a rotten mackerel by moonlight, stinks as it shines." -
    24. Re:PVR pricing needs work by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I sincerely doubt that was the actual cost of the hardware. They were probably keeping the price down to make up for it in subscription fees.

      If, like this device, they did not charge a subscription, then they would have to sell it for a more realistic price.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    25. Re:PVR pricing needs work by evilviper · · Score: 1
      "...because there is no removable media..." This really isn't at all important.

      Yes, yes it is.

      Okay, let's say that Tivo has billions of features never before seen by mankind... Let's say that it's a great product, and that everyone loves them (which isn't true, but this is theoretical).

      Still, since it has no removable media, it will never be able to replace a single VCR. That means, people are going to be spending $40-$100 on an entirely different device in addition to their Tivos.

      Say how great the Tivo is all you want. I'm not saying that the Tivo is just a souped-up VCR, I'm saying, without removable media, TIVO STILL CAN'T REPLACE A SINGLE VCR.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    26. Re:PVR pricing needs work by evilviper · · Score: 1
      In fact, the only thing I've used a VCR for in the past 2 years was to dump something off TiVo to give to a friend.

      That was exactly my point. Tivo can't replace a VCR just for lack of removable media. All it needs is a CD/DVD recorder so it can record VCD/SVCD/DVDs, and then there is no more need for a $40-$100 extra device.

      You may have thought about getting rid of your VCR, but the Tivo really hasn't really made that possible just yet.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    27. Re:PVR pricing needs work by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      There are forthcoming TiVo models from Toshiba and Panasonic that integrate a rewritable DVD drive. They'll cost considerably more than $99 or $199 though - I think somewhere close to $600. Given that stand alone DVD rewriters are in the $400-500 range still, it's not a bad price (presuming I recall the price right... it may be $800, I dunno).

      Honestly, I could get rid of one of my VCRs. I seriously considered not hooking it up when I bought a new receiver and entertainment center. But it's only a couple additional cables, so I went ahead and did so. If I need to dump something to tape, I'm likely to transfer it to the bedroom TiVo first -- the connections are much simpler.

    28. Re:PVR pricing needs work by supercargo · · Score: 1

      And not to be too argumentative: Yes, yes it can. It may be just my own ignorance, but I know of many VCR owners (myself among them), none of which ever shared their own recordings. For many people (and in my experience, most people), the VCR is really just a VCP, and in this mode, the Tivo most certainly does replace the VCR.

      At this point, I suppose, we can agree to disagree.

      --
      -- "He is a being, so brilliant yet so corrupt, which, like a rotten mackerel by moonlight, stinks as it shines." -
    29. Re:PVR pricing needs work by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Kodak, and the image quality will be worse with analog cable?? Instead of artifacts, you get static and no digital audio.

      Digital cable is also compressed. The artifacts will be the same there, too. God help you if someone in your area has bad wiring in their home and it screws with everyone's signal on the ring.

      When I speak of the benefits of digital satellite, I speak of the overall value. You can't beat it with land line services currently.

      Also, if artifacts are terrible, you may want to check signal strengths on your tuner. I purchased a 28" dish and better LNB (~70 bucks), which got me up to 99% signal. This was a noticable difference from the 84-90% I was getting before with the stock 18" dish.. Remember, any signal loss results in lost information thus more artifacts.

      In the Southeastern US, cable prices are much higher than satellite charges. The difference at my current location for the same service is about $12.50 a month. That covers my UTV bill and half a premium channel (which doesn't get discounted nearly as well with cable services).

      Plus, who wants to rely on that 20 year old wire? I had cable service a few years ago that was out easilly 20% of the time. If my DTV goes down now, it's something I can fix because, well, I own the receiver and the dish and can go give it an adjustment or replace a part. With cable, you are stuck waiting on some dumb redneck to come visit 2 weeks after reporting the problem to tell you there's a problem somewhere on the local ring (9 miles) and they can't find it. Plus, in most states you can't own your own receiver. lame. SCREW THAT. I am not paying for such BS! :)

    30. Re:PVR pricing needs work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't use a Tivo, I have a home built PVR.

      "Mine has a 120GB."

      Mine has 1 PCI slot, totalling 880 GB presently (5 drives). I have a DVD player, so I have the capacity to add 2 more drives. Current setup with the 250gb drives would drive capacity to 1.75 TB (hard drive TB). With a single PCI slot, I could add a 12 drive support 3ware card, which would add 8 more available drives, or yet another 2 TB.

      Yes, my system is fanless and no, it's not water cooled. Yes, it's warm to the touch. I would imagine that adding more drives would probably require the addition of a nice large case fan. It would definitely require a fan in the power supply, which would have to be upgraded from the fanless model I use.

      Yes, it's a toy. I record cable TV at 12mbit/sec CBR, not efficient. But that's not why I have the system--I built it to learn about the problems with large drives and 4gb regular transfers on standard motherboards.

      At some point, it gets a little insane. But on a 6 PCI slot system, you're talking 12 drives x 6 x 250 gb + 3 (4 onboard controllers - 1 for the optical drive of choice).

      You could have some fun with copying entire DVDs to hard drives as well as uncompressed CDs.

  22. Re:Early GNAA Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer to think of myself as an Alternative African American, or AAA. You might do better in your, um, membership drive if you considered a name change. Although you might run into some trouble from the Americna Automobile Association, since both pastimes involve "driving."

  23. Whoa, itvXUL? by ultrapenguin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the description of their "media OS" based on Linux, http://interact-tv.com/EOS.php, I noticed something...

    ItvXUL: XML based description language for describing itvgui based applications.

    Does that mean their UI is based on http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xul/?

  24. ReplayTV by bill.sheehan · · Score: 0, Troll

    For less money you can get a ReplayTV. It has some truly wonderful programming features, and you can tie it into your home network with DVArchive and Personal ReplayGuide (both open source). I can stream ReplayTV programs to my PC and back again. It's the best entertainment purchase I've ever made. Check it out at http://www.replay.com (but buy from Amazon - it's $50 cheaper!).

    1. Re:ReplayTV by evilviper · · Score: 1
      For less money you can get a ReplayTV.

      Yeah, but then you are tied to the company that owns ReplayTV that week, and whatever they decide to charge. If it could pull TV listings off of a free website (even if there is a small, non-animated banner while you go through the guide) and could schedule recordings by time/day-of-week/date without any subscription, then I'd be happy to get one. Since that's not the case, I spent just under $300 to get a seriously high-end machine, plus a TV-capture card, and can get it to do anything I want, no company standing in the way... I will admit it is a huge hassle to get everything working under Linux, but definately worth it.

      (It was very easy to get everything working under FreeBSD, but ironically, there isn't any really good FreeBSD software for recording from TV).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:ReplayTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:-1, Does not use Linux)

      (Score:-1, Violates Groupthink By Not Blindly Recommending TiVo)

    3. Re:ReplayTV by bill.sheehan · · Score: 1

      ReplayTV were bought out by Sonic Blue a couple years ago, and recently acquired by DM Holdings (the Denon Marantz people). Looks pretty stable to me. Sure, they could go tits up - any company can - but they show no signs of it.
      As for building your own - been there, done that. I don't mean to detract from the incredible effort and talent being poured into MythTV, Freevo, etc., but the software and drivers just aren't there yet. Replay and Tivo are mature consumer products. I can understand wanting to build your own, or have ultimate control over it, but this is an appliance we're talking about here - something the rest of the family would like to be able to use!

    4. Re:ReplayTV by evilviper · · Score: 1
      the software and drivers just aren't there yet. Replay and Tivo are mature consumer products.


      It is true that it's difficult to get a TV card working under Linux, but that is a one-time effort... After that, you have a working system.

      Additionally, it is incredibly easy to get things working under FreeBSD... If MythTV was somehow ported to FreeBSD, it would be a great combo. It would take you 5 minutes to setup following a 5-line set of instructions.

      Personally, I find the setup time with Linux to be less significant than the monthly fee of Replay/Tivo. Not only that, but I don't just have control, I have a lot more functionality than I can even imagine Tivo/Replay will have. I can stick in a DVD-R and make DVDs if I want. I can may VCDs, SVCDs, I can send files over the network, edit videos, rip DVDs... Anything at all. Neither Replay nor Tivo give you anything close to that. MythTV/Freevo isn't there yet, so it requires some effort on your part to tie everything together, but at least you can do it when you have control over the system.

      Besides, I would never buy a Tivo/Replay if for no other reason than that I am not going to allow someone else absolute control over my system. I am not willing to risk that I will wake up one day to find my PVR crippled.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  25. Re:It's hot! by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Shut up. I really wish they'd just IP block the dorks who post those stupid messages. Or just stop allowing AC posts.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  26. count me on board by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a sexcellent idea.

  27. Are MythTV and Freevo ready for primetime? by ryder · · Score: 1

    I've used a Tivo daily for about 3 years, and couldn't live without it. How do these alternatives compare? Are either of them mature products? Or will I be needing to use nightly builds to get essential features?

    My Tivo's getting old, and I know at somepoint it will fail. I'd love to get one of those shuttle mini cases and roll my own PVR if the usability and ease of use were up there.

    Extra features like xvid, mp3/ogg, etc support are nice, but do these programs really have the same level of functionality as a Tivo's most essential function: watching and recording TV?

    1. Re:Are MythTV and Freevo ready for primetime? by olderchurch · · Score: 1

      I have bought a shuttle as a workstation and mainly because it was supposed to be quiet (and of course because it looks good). I must say that the quiet part leaves me a bit dissapointed. I have a HP workstation, which is much quiter, without tweaking anything. I'm not saying don't buy one. It is a wonderful machine, but I would not want the noise 24x7 in my living room.

      --
      Disclaimer: This opinion was created without the use of any facts
    2. Re:Are MythTV and Freevo ready for primetime? by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1


      MythTV: yes. I bought a dedicated Shuttle XPC box a few months back and now have a Myth box in my living room. It's amazing.

      Watch live TV. Pause it, rewind, etc. Record shows that you want to watch through the program guide. It does everything TiVo does and more (music, photos, videos, games). It even has a web interface so while at work I can schedule shows I want to record.

      I'd ask, why get a TiVo when you can get a MythTV box?

      --
      --- witty signature
  28. "I can do it better" ? by Quixote · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have been considering doing one too. But I can't seem to find a decent capture card for Linux that will do realtime MPEG2 (or even MPEG1) compression in hardware, so that you can pause live TV, record one show while watching another, etc.

    Any ideas?

    1. Re:"I can do it better" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those WinTV PVR-250s apparently work quite well in combination with MythTV - I'm using some cheapo WinTV card I got from Micro Center for $40 bucks and it works just fine also. Get a pair of them and you could dual recording.

    2. Re:"I can do it better" ? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Why would you want hardware encoding? Athlon 2xxx+ processors are dirt-cheap, and can encode realtime MPEG-4 without a problem... non-mpeg2 TV capture cards are $40 (mine came with FM radio and a remote as well for that price).

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:"I can do it better" ? by exhilaration · · Score: 2, Informative
      a decent capture card for Linux that will do realtime MPEG2

      The Myth TV mailing list suggests that the Hauppage PVR-250 is the best choice. Someone on the list said it can be found for $90 OEM.

      record one show while watching another

      According to the MythTV site, you'll need two TV tuner cards to do that.

    4. Re:"I can do it better" ? by eyegor · · Score: 1

      noise, me bucko.

      The more stuff you can do in hardware (encoding,decoding,yadda), the less stuff you need to do in software. You can then have quieter fans, less heat, less RAM, etc.

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    5. Re:"I can do it better" ? by tfoss · · Score: 1
      Why not a hauppage wintv-pvr250? MythTV seems to be able to use it.

      -Ted

      --
      -=-=- Quantum physics - the dreams stuff are made of.
    6. Re:"I can do it better" ? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      You Can get a WinTV PVR 250 OEM for under $90 - an extra $40-$50 over the WinTV card for HW MPEG-2 encoding is definitely worth it...

    7. Re:"I can do it better" ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Record one show while watching another
      > According to the MythTV site, you'll need two TV tuner cards to do that.
      No you don't. If you want to record two shows at the same time, then you do.

    8. Re:"I can do it better" ? by swb · · Score: 1

      I think this is the biggest stumbling block for any PC-based PVR device. Tivo has its codec integrated into the CPU silicon (IIRC).

      I have been really unimpressed with the lack of quality and flexibilty of PC TV tuner cards. Almost always the TV tuner and video capabilities of these cards are limited, from the quantity and type of inputs and outputs, to the quality, to the need for the data to be worked on by the CPU too often.

    9. Re:"I can do it better" ? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      You can then have quieter fans, less heat, less RAM, etc.

      That's not really true. Your hardware encoding is going to be putting off plenty of heat as well. In fact, lots of hardware encoders are just good ole PPC or other general purpose processors... So that makes a bit of difference when using Intel/AMD systems, but not a bit of difference when doing this on a PowerPC system.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:"I can do it better" ? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      an extra $40-$50 over the WinTV card for HW MPEG-2 encoding is definitely worth it...

      I don't think so. I'm going to be ripping everything to MPEG-4 anyhow, so what do I get out of the $50 extra? Not too much.

      Additionally consider the much faster AMD CPU I could get for that same $50 extra...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  29. the burning question by newsdee · · Score: 1

    I have a mini-itx box that is cheaper and (subjectively) cooler looking. I just don't have a remote, but who cares with a RF keyboard/mouse combo... Now what I want to know is, if that is based on Linux, then is there any way to get the software so that I can turn my own box into a PVR? Now that's an OSS I'm looking forward to! :-)

    Bonus: look for the following and you too can build a Tivo out of your old PC's spare parts: Via Epia M 933 Mhz, Cubid 2699R mini-itx case (also in black), IBM Wireless Navigator Pro. (note: all these links point to pictures, not shops). Add the appropriate Linux distro, and voila, cheap PVR.

    1. Re:the burning question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. So I wasnt the only one thinking about 'borrowing' their software and building my own box.

      So now does one wait for the drive image to be posted on the net or does one utilize one of the B&M 30 day return policies and copy the drive and then return the unit? ....oh wait that would be wrong and unethical........

  30. For there's a penguin in the Telly... by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    ...and he isn't going to explode.

    (Still looking for Penguin on the Telly).

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  31. oops - forgot to mention the capture card by newsdee · · Score: 1

    I forgot to mention the need for your favorite brand of (PCI) TV tuner card. Furthermore, the Mini-itx motherboard has integrated TV-out and 5.1 surround connectivity. :-)

    1. Re:oops - forgot to mention the capture card by really? · · Score: 1

      many TV tuner/capture cards will not fit in that case - even if you do remove the two little fans. I know 'cause I tried. :-(
      (Thugh, I hear that they changed the design slightly, so maybe now it's OK???)

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    2. Re:oops - forgot to mention the capture card by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      An ATI TV Wonder VE fills the bill pretty damn well. It has a guide and everything. You can get an RF remote for it, too.

      Does the Cubid 2699R come with the IDE/Power connector for a slim DVD/CD drive?

      What is the lowest price for a slim, black CD-RW/DVD combo drive? I have seen them as low as $108.

      I cuurently have my mini-itx PVR built into a $6.00 K-Mart toolbox, but am considering a Cubid case so I can move the box into the living room.

    3. Re:oops - forgot to mention the capture card by newsdee · · Score: 1

      it depends - are you sure we are talking about the same case? AFAIK there are two cubids types, one for "basic" Epias (500/800 Mhz) and one for "Epia M"s (933Mhz). However, there is something that looks like a slim drive bay on top of the hdd (maybe it's for an internal compact flash card reader), and I guess you would have to remove it to have enough room.

      Be sure to let me know which TV tuners cards you did try and what case you are using... so I don't buy something too big... :-)

    4. Re:oops - forgot to mention the capture card by newsdee · · Score: 1

      It depends on how the power connectors are for the slim drives (I don't have one, my drive is a standard drive in a cheap USB2 casing). However the power cable has one "normal" IDE cable (for my HDD), and two smaller connectors that I had never seen before. I suppose that they are for the slim optical drives since it the case does have a slim drive bay.

      A word of warning though: you have to make sure to have RAM that is not very high... or else your drive won't fit horizontally (it may fit tilting it a little. Some people have sandusted the plastic on their RAMs PCB to make everything fit... but I know that there are "shorter" RAMs out there).

      Let me know if you find a cheaper slim drive :-)
      The problem is that for that price you can get something external to use in every machine that you own - good for DVD burners for example (assuming that in every computer you have enough speed via USB2 or firewire).

    5. Re:oops - forgot to mention the capture card by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      My other machines have DVD and CDR drives. This sucker is going in the living room eventually.

      My office can look like a computer show exploded and sound like a vaccum cleaner show room, but my wife controls the living room. There looks (and quiet) matters...

  32. VCR's used to be more than that.. by asv108 · · Score: 1
    Until these things cost the same as a VCR I couldn't possibly justify paying the price

    Considering DVR technology is still in its infancy, the price is rather good. In 1983 our RCA VCR/Camcorder combo cost almost $2000. If you wanted to shoot video away from the TV, you were required to carry 3/4 of the twenty pound VCR with you. I think the unit without the camcorder was $1300 or so, adjust that for inflation and your looking at about $2500 for that VCR. Good thing these things aren't at VCR prices..

    1. Re:VCR's used to be more than that.. by asv108 · · Score: 1

      I forgot to include the link to the unit which is available for about $20 shipped these days.

    2. Re:VCR's used to be more than that.. by pheared · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, duh.

      I was clearly talking about the current price of VCRs. You're just pointing out exactly what my problem with the technology is: that it is still too costly to adopt.

  33. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, are you that asshole on sci.crypt and comp.compression who used to bitch about how the old sk00l posters were assholes, then turned around and started shilling your shitty library and being a jackass to new posters? Just curious. We don't usually get to see your true colors, is all.

    Almost as bad as that scott19u.zip asshat.

  34. Linux for the masses by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    At $900, it's too expensive. But remember, VCR's started out at $1k.

    A next gen one of these (cheaper, more features..DVD-RW, pause live video, etc etc) will bring Linux to the masses. Easy network with the house LAN, bigger HD for general storage, web server and access from anywhere, reasonable GUI...

    But they won't know or care. The guts of the GUI and Linux kernel will be hidden, so Joe TV can't screw it up.

    Root access? What's that? Oh...the 'Config' button on the remote that asks for a password so I can change some settings? ok...THAT thing. Gotcha.

    1. Re:Linux for the masses by pi42 · · Score: 1

      But doesn't TiVo already run Linux?

      But they won't know or care. The guts of the GUI and Linux kernel will be hidden, so Joe TV can't screw it up.

      Hm.. a bit like TiVo ;-) The problem is that if anything like this gets big, but based on a more open system than TiVo (free program listings, copy to PCs over the network, watch divx, burn to DVD, etc.), the MPAA and friends will raise a fuss.

      Sadly, I think the only way to get a totally open PVR box will be home-built and hacked-together for the next while.

  35. Interlaced TV output? by WD · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like a neat unit, but I have one question...

    TV-Out cards (or video cards with TV-out) generally deinterlace the signal in the process of converting the signal to something that the TV can understand.

    The advantage of this is that the picture can easily be scaled to handle overscan. But the disadvantage is that the image quality, especially in panning scenes, is compromised. An interlaced NTSC signal will display 59.94 fields per second. This will allow for smooth motion, especially in the example of a scrolling ticker at the bottom of the screen. When the signal is deinterlaced, that rate is cut in half to 29.97 and there can be blurring in areas of fast motion.

    If this unit is using standard PC hardware, then it is likely deinterlacing the output. If so, it would make a pretty poor replacment for a DVD player. So much for an all-in-one solution...

    Does this Telly unit have true interlaced TV output? If so, how is it achieved?

    1. Re:Interlaced TV output? by efedora · · Score: 1

      From the website.....
      Does the DVD player provide any special features (such as multi-zone, progressive scan, etc.)?

      If you were to attach a progressive scan monitor to the SVGA connector, you have progressive scan DVD playback. The TV output is interlaced to work with normal television sets.

    2. Re:Interlaced TV output? by Op7imus_Prim3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      All TV is interlaced unless your talking about 100HZ or progressive scan TV's.

      The problem with these sets displaying fast motion is that they merge the field together to give one full frame. This is great for a drama, but if you want to watch the footy, then the ball is moving so quick it is in a different position in each field. If you merge these fields together you get an elongated ball. Some of the newer sets have a funky setting to fix this and I have no idea how it works, but it uses some algorithm to determine where the ball should be, and needs a whole seperate chip.

      But to answer your question, it does do interlaced outpt, otherwise your TV couldn't display it. So while you PC monitor is de-interlaced, anything getting sent out the TV out part of the card must be interlaced. And if you use an S video cable you should be getting quality that equals your average DVD player. So interlacing is not the be all and end all of TV quality. Go out and buy a digital TV. You know you want to...

    3. Re:Interlaced TV output? by WD · · Score: 1

      So while you PC monitor is de-interlaced, anything getting sent out the TV out part of the card must be interlaced. And if you use an S video cable you should be getting quality that equals your average DVD player.

      Say you are playing an interlaced video clip (such as an MPEG2 from a DVD) on a PC. When it's played back on a PC Monitor, interlaced material will show both fields simultaneously. (giving the "mouse tooth" effect on motion scenes). Most software DVD players for the PC will use Bob, Weave, or a combination of the two deinterlacing methods to get rid of those effects.

      Now, back to my original point. Consider you have a recording on your PVR that is interlaced. (as the NTSC broadcast signal is). They key is to output that recording to the TV while retaining the original interlacing. Your common PC hardware with TV-out capabilities will not retain the original material's interlacing.

      With such equipment, the video bridge will generally only convert non-interlaced material to interlaced. So yes, by the time the signal hits the TV, it's interlaced. And when it's recorded, it's interlaced. But what you need to consider is that at some point in the process the signal is de-interlaced. The video bridge does this deinterlacing internally, usually along with some image enhancements as anti-flicker and scaling for overscan, at which point the benefit of having an interlaced recording is lost.

      No, it's not impossible to retain the interlacing information. There are some external VGA->TV boxes that can do this. And I'm assuming that a Tivo unit has some dedicated hardware to handle this. But your run of the mill PC TV-Out will not.

    4. Re:Interlaced TV output? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Interlace via TV-out is indeed possible. The trick is having a source which is 59.94 frames per second. That is you bob de-interlace it.

      A TV appears to the OS as a regular monitor running at 60Hz (or 50Hz for PAL). The media player will send a bob deinterlaced video to the TV at 59.94 progressive frames per second and the video card will convert it to 29.97 interlaced frames per second.

      The only problem with that is there is a 50/50 chance the video will start playing while an even field is being drawn resulting in a field order different from the original. However provided the bob deinterlacing is done properly this will not be noticable.
    5. Re:Interlaced TV output? by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1
      TV-Out cards (or video cards with TV-out) generally deinterlace the signal in the process of converting the signal to something that the TV can understand.
      No, TV-Out cards must *interlace* the signal. Computer video output is normally NOT interlaced, but most standard-definition television sets require interlace. Most HDTV sets can support both interlaced and progressive signals, although it is typical that they support 720p and 1080i but not 1080p.

      If you use a TV capture card to view a standard-definition source (e.g., NTSC or PAL programming) on your computer monitor, the card (or software) has to deinterlace it (also known as line-doubling). Deinterlacing video is a tough problem with no single "correct" solution, so the quality of deinterlacing varies dramatically from one product to another and dependent on the program source.

      In normal interlaced video, the two consecutively transmitted fields that make up an interlaced frame are not time-coincident. The two fields are captured at 1/60 second intervals, rather than capturing pairs of fields at 1/30 second intervals. This makes video appear smoother, so it is normally an advantage.

      On the other hand, when film (24 FPS) is transferred to NTSC video, a "3:2 pulldown" process is used to produce the separated fields. In this case, even and odd fields are time-coincident, however some fields are repeated such that any given pair of consecutive fields are not necessarily time-coincident. However, each film frame does contribute do at least one even field and at least one odd field, so it is possible for the 3:2 pulldown to be reversed without loss or interpolation.

      MPEG-2 video (as used in DVDs) is capable of encoding that a field is to be repeated, so most DVDs mastered from film do in fact only encode pairs of time-coincident fields. This allows DVD players with progressive scan outputs to avoid the need for any interpolation or filtering from such sources. They only need to do real deinterlacing if the source was a video camera rather than film, since the film gets deinterlaced during the MPEG-2 encoding process.

    6. Re:Interlaced TV output? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No, TV-Out cards must *interlace* the signal.

      Still, most TV cards mess up properly captured (interlaced) TV video. That is you see interlacing artifacts when playing them back on the TV: and not because of the playback software but because what the signal goes thorugh on its way out the video card's TV-out (e.g. svideo).
      I yet to see a video card that supports true interlaced out on its TV-out: e.g. one with wich you can set an interlaced NTSC X modilne (like the one at http://www.sput.nl/hardware/tv-x.html). A scan converter would probably solve the issue, but that's an other $50-90.

    7. Re:Interlaced TV output? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Funny, my hollywood+ has interlaced output and has a better composite video out and last time I checked it was a standard PC hardware.

      Oh BTW, hollywood is still making hardware mpeg output cards... their latest will decode a mpeg4 perfectly on a 586-133mhz running windows 98.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  36. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Keep posting your whines, and you'll be posting at -1. And IP blocking isn't workable--if you'd ever adminstered anything in your sorry life, you'd know that.

  37. It cries to be a Beos App! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I still think this is a place where some enterprising young/old upstart programmer could make a name for him/her self. Write a Beos PVR or port Myth TV (which seems to be updated quite frequently).

    Beos is already in use professionally as a audio scheduler (Tunetracker), I see no reason that video can't be added.

    Of special note, using Beos would allow you to 'roll your own' on *much* cheaper hardware than Win or Linux - an old Pentium 233/64 ram most likely could handle the job, since it is ass-fast on old boxen. Add a big ol' harddrive and you're in bidness.

    1. Re:It cries to be a Beos App! by quinkin · · Score: 1
      Then all we would need to do is add some vaguely decent networking apps/subsystems to BeOS...

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
    2. Re:It cries to be a Beos App! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother? MythTV does not run as a little application in a window on your desktop; it is the "desktop" The user couldn't tell the different if it was runnong BeOS or Linux or CP/M. There are no technical reasons to use BeOS as a kernel either; modern Linux can out-Be BeOS these days.

      using Beos would allow you to 'roll your own' on *much* cheaper hardware than Win or Linux - an old Pentium 233/64 ram

      Good job too, because BeOS won't run on anything remotly aproaching modern harware such as a Pentium IV, Athlon or VIA/Cyrix CPU's, nVidia graphics cards or most onboard audio chipsets.

      Please get over BeOS, and stop believing everything OpenBeOS tells you. They have about five developers and five years worth of work ahead of them before they get something even approaching usable.

    3. Re:It cries to be a Beos App! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Informative
      Uh. Your info is sadly out-of-date.

      I type this from a dual booter, BeOS and WinXP a P4 with an nVidia card and C-Media sound in it. If you had any interest other than trolling, you could go to bebits.com and see that there are drivers and patches for all that you mention, plus plenty you don't. I dual boot for my pro audio Aardvark Q10 (which *isn't* supported by linux, and a far cry from 'most onboard audio chipsets')

      Myth TV may 'be the desktop' but BeOS *is* the desktop - the GUI is BeOS and viceversa. Linux may excel at some stuff, but it still isn't as responsive as BeOS. (God forbid some newbie wants to install or configure something)

      OBeOS hardly has five developers, and somehow they have managed more than 5 years of work on their OS. So please get over yourself, and stop believing everything you read on /. and do some (any) research before you troll.

    4. Re:It cries to be a Beos App! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, patches. Unoficial binary patches. That do not work on all systems. Thats not supported, thats duct taped together. Got a GeForce 4, a GeForceGo or Radeon 9700? Oh well, stick to older hardware eh? I'm glad your soundcard is at least supported, good for you.

      As for OBOS, I've been following it quite closely. It doesn't even boot itself to a GUI yet; the only things close to complete are OpenBeFS, the Media Framework, the GUI and a few misc. bits. There is about two people who know the first thing about kernels working on a NewOS fork, and DarkWym doesn't seem in much of a rush to release even an alpha app_server replacement. OpenBeOS is only useful if you already have BeOS 5 installed, and even then its application and usefulness is limited. If OBOS reckon they'll release a working version by Christmas, they're on acid. Maybe they'll have some sort of bastard child BeOS PE 5/OBOS frankenstien "preview", or heck maybe they'll have an alpha kernel booting to an alpha appserver running an alpha GUI? At least they'll be 30% of the way there if they do!

      Lets get real here; OpenBeOS has hundreds of "developers", but only 5 of them are active. Hey, they used to be double digits, but what a shame they seem to have lost a few of them lately. I wonder why.

      Like I said, running MythTV on BeOS is pointless when everyting MythTV needs is offered by Linux.

  38. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, that's him.

  39. Help! by shepd · · Score: 1

    THX-1138 really was the future! I like my hair, and I prefer "colours" other than white!

    Then again, I could always run until they run out of money...

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  40. a feature I'd like to see by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    How about a simplistic modem you can plug into the phone outlet so you can have callerid overlaid on your TV for incoming calls? Or notifications of friends/etc logging onto IM or IRC servers, and the ability to 'page' you?

    1. Re:a feature I'd like to see by quinkin · · Score: 1
      How about a horoscope ticker that scrolls diagonally over the movie being watched while applying random video filters and burning your toast...

      What ever drugs you are on, double the dose.

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
    2. Re:a feature I'd like to see by openSoar · · Score: 1

      callerid - my "upstairs" satellite receiver does this - very pleased with it so far.

    3. Re:a feature I'd like to see by mikefoley · · Score: 1

      I think Gemstar has that patented. You'd have to license it from them.

      (Anything that displays on a TV, they seem to have a patent for)

      --
      What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
    4. Re:a feature I'd like to see by gvonk · · Score: 1

      Check out the TiVo community forum...
      Every single feature you just described is available in some form or another. I know it supports YAC.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    5. Re:a feature I'd like to see by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Or just not license it from them and use it anyway. That's what I'd do. Who's going to know if I write a module and distribute it on freenet?

      --
      My other car is first.
  41. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent example in the first link! Kudos.

  42. Re:Can I Join the GNAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, you only have to be gay or a nigger. You don't have to be both, though you can be.

  43. HDTV People... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 1

    I know it's not widespread right now, but those of us that have it aren't likely to be very impressed by NTSC or PAL images (oh yeah, I'd like my Dolby Digital 5.1 sound too).

    My understanding is that TiVo will have an HDTV unit around the end of the year, until then I'm hanging onto my wallet (well, not exactly - I'm just buying different toys).

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  44. Re:It's hot! by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why are my libraries "shitty" may I ask?

    Or is that just the qualified opinion of some two-bit punk who can't write software that is used by others?

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  45. Yes, it's too expensive but... by HiKarma · · Score: 1

    They seem to have their heads screwed on right. Customer centric, expandable design. Didn't see it said explicitly but I would hope you can mount the disks elsewhere on the network with samba so they don't have to make noise in the TV room.

    Looks more likely to be expandable to dtv and hdtv too, though the latter is probably something that requires new hardware to output to the hdtv.

    (What I want is a component architecture on 100mbit ethernet. The decoder should stick on the TV and take ethernet to it over which the compressed stream flows, is decoded, mixed with overlay, and put onto the monitor. Thus when you get a different type of TV standard, all you need is this decoder built into or slapped onto the TV.)

    The only reason I don't want it is the MPAA wants to put DRM in it, but otherwise it should be digital all the way to the TV. Forget ugly protocols like firewire and USB which try to define the format of streams. Ethernet and IP all the way.

    Tivo started out great but is starting to work in anti-customer ways, locking up their later boxes, letting Replay lead the way and be sued. It's good to see competition coming forward.

    1. Re:Yes, it's too expensive but... by really? · · Score: 1

      remote samba mounts sound good, till you realize that the CPU has just enough power to decode the MPEG stream. If it also has to fetch the data over the LAN you get dropped frames. My experience on a 800 anyway, could be that the video chip does more decoding work on the M series boards, so you'll be OK. They all use the same shitty - resource hogs - RTL chips for their LAN ...

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    2. Re:Yes, it's too expensive but... by HiKarma · · Score: 1

      So the CPU does the decoding on this box? On the Tivo it's decoding hardware, which seems the way to go if you are not building a general purpose PC.

      But in fact, no, you should get not dropped frames because you would not be pulling the video as you display it.

      The high quality mpeg stream tends to be in the range of 5 to 8 megabits. Better quality compressors do much better than that, DVD quality can be had at 5 megabits with good compressors.

      Anyway, the ethernet and fileserver should be capable of much more than that. So you start transferring the moment the program is selected and you build up a large buffer in RAM or on local disk (if you have local disk, but ideally you don't, you just have 512mb ram because it is cheap) and you decode from that.

      Unless your machine is totally saturated you will not lose data.

      Of course, as I noted, ideally, the mpeg decoder is on or in the TV, and all the PVR does is sling bits from the disk to the TV, which requires minimal CPU.

    3. Re:Yes, it's too expensive but... by avidday · · Score: 1

      From the description on the specs page of their site, this is an EPIA-M motherboard , so there is MPEG 2 hardware decoding in the CLE266 north bridge. That should change the cpu load situation significantly.

    4. Re:Yes, it's too expensive but... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to mount the remote disk with samba? It's such an ugly hack. Just use NFS, for crying out loud.

      Is there a PAL/UHF/6MHz sound version of this thing, does anyone know?

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  46. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we're in agreement on the fact that you're an asshole and a hypocrite when it comes to dealing with people new to your crypto/compression clique, it's just the quality of library code now, right?

  47. Re:THIS JUST IN by quinkin · · Score: 1
    Uh huh,

    As a web developer, there is no way I will give up my mozilla and assorted mozilla mutants (Javascript debugging is just too damn convenient).

    Btw, that is an extremely poor statistical analysis.

    To quote the senate hearing: "the rate of fatal rollovers for pickups is twice that for passenger cars and the rate for SUVs is almost three times the passenger car rate" - and using your logic this implies that pickups are twice as numerous as passenger cars, and SUV's are three time as numerous as passenger cars.

    Not that I disagree with the majority of historical points, but there is definitely a niche market (of developers no less) who have a vested interest in it's continuation.

    My $0.05 (2c is no longer valid currency in Australia).

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  48. Make your own... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This is a case of a company hoping a user will just be too lazy to do the work themselves, considering a vast majority of the hardware and software has counterparts available to the consumer.

    Find your favorite brand CD-RW drive or DVD drive:

    CD/DVD R/RW drivesrange from $35 - $359

    Find your favorite case:

    mini-itx cases max $112

    Find your favorite rounded IDE cables:

    Rounded IDE cablesmax $10 each

    Get your favorite Linux ISO:

    List of Linux ISO

    Do you want/need a wireless keyboard and remote? Those kits are available too. You can use various handheld devices, learning remotes or dedicated programable remotes. You can also use a wired keyboard and mouse.

    Yeah, there are bits and bobbles I have left out. Yeah, you need to install Linux and one of the PVR programs available out there. Yeah, it will suck your time, but you'll know a lot more about your machine, you'll have a machine you can upgrade, change, etc at will. You'll have full controll of the software without any need for hacking, for a lot less.

    That is a faster machine, likely a faster HDD, probably higher quality RAM, better cables, your choice of cases and whatever else you want. You could throw in a a 1 or 2 slot PCI riser, a Sigma Designs XCard and Remote and whatever else you want.

    It's still $550, you still need to pay s/h and taxes where applicable. However, you can decide to save some money on the ram, the case, or any other part.

    1. Re:Make your own... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could buy a refurbed TiVo/ReplayTV for the same price, and save yourself the aggravation of trying to make Linux do anything right. Do you really want to go through such fine support channels as:

      --- AnonCoward has joined #linuxhelp
      [AnonCoward] hey how do I get mythtv to work with my capture card?
      [linuxguru] rtfm loser
      [AnonCoward] I did -- it says "TODO: Write this section" in every chapter
      [linuxguru] so write the manual, then rtfm
      [AnonCoward] can't you help me?
      --- linuxguru kicked AnonCoward from #linuxhelp (stfu and rtfm u loser)
  49. all that for only $900? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wheres all the savings from using a free os?

    1. Re:all that for only $900? by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      wheres all the savings from using a free os?

      The XP Media Center which claims similar features (sort of) is what, $3-$4k

      Sorry, whatever people say, as a person who build several Myth boxes, $900 is not far about what it would cost in retail prices and there are many aspects where this beats the Myth box hands down (dynamically adding hdd storage space is something I've been wanting for a while) If this thing is actually stable, I think it is a reasonable box. Not cheap, but not too overpriced.

      And no, it will not replace tivo or VCR, this is a whole different animal. Kinda like comparing boombox to a home theater, similar purpose, different scale.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  50. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That'd be better than a two-bit thief. And an insolent little cuss, I might add.

  51. I'd buy one of these if it worked in Canada by miguel_at_menino.com · · Score: 1

    I'd buy one of these in a flash if it worked in Canada. Same with the tivo, I'd love to have one if it worked with Canadian listings.

  52. Re:It's hot! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    I don't even talk on the compression group anymore.

    So if you are going to try and insult me at least keep uptodate.

    And "asshole" is very subjective. My guess is your beef with me is I'm your target of the day. So if that is the case being an "ass" by your standards isn't very meaningful.

    Also you haven't addressed the issue. Why are my libraries "shitty". Or were you just mouthing off?

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  53. Paving the road for better products by seismic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This Telly device does seem expensive. What's exciting is the prospect of better, cheaper, and more mainstream products to come.

    When this concept becomes mainstream things will really get cool.

    It took mp3 players to legitimize the mp3 format and show consumers that audio cd's are limiting. It will take PVR/media playing hardware to do the same for movies and tv.

  54. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I don't even talk on the compression group anymore.

    Heh. I wouldn't, either.

  55. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My guess is your beef with me is I'm your target of the day.

    Aw, c'mon. What on earth would make anyone think that a good-natured, humble, intelligent scholar like yourself would become someone's target. Unimaginable!

  56. Re:Not a reply from the original debator, but... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    First off newb-to-reality I didn't rip off his code. He just didn't agree with my license. In the end I agreed with him and removed his code.

    It's called a discussion. See where multiple people talk without resorting to cowardly practices and name calling.

    Can't we just get along? I bet in real life you're just the sweetest person on Earth. Ahh gimme a hug!

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  57. move to delaware by tube013 · · Score: 1

    no sales tax here... ie in the $1 store things really are $1 not $1.07 or what ever...

  58. porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    because that is a stupid idea.

  59. People missing the point by msanchez426 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You guys are really missing the point of this device. It's true it's similar to TIVO/ReplayTV but go and read everything in the web site:
    -This is a PVR and DVD player. The only TIVO that has this is the fancy panasonic for 1000$ that hasn't come out yet.
    -It's also a cdwriter and can be upgraded to a DVD writer in due time.
    -It's network transparent even for Windows/Mac people, no extra usb ethernet needed.
    -It's expandable without having to hack it, you can add two hard drives bought of the shelf. I'd put it in the infinite expandable category just for that. BTW the extra space will look like one volume.
    -It's standard linux, it has a web server, samba, etc. So it replaces whatever old box that you have lying around as a server, storage or whatever else.
    -You can access the interface which seems nicely done both directly and remotely via a web server.
    -As a plus it has all kinds of media playing capabilties: video, audio, photos.
    -The one linked is the analog one, there is also a digital version for 100$ bucks more.

    Finally, and very importantly they give you the SDK for producing your own software, they seem keen on open source and people developing their own little apps. So if you think a feature is missing, heck you can go and program it yourself. Isn't that the most important feature?

    That's on the positive side. The one thing that it seems to lack is replay as it records. But that should be fixable if we overflow their mailboxes with requests ;-)

    Disclaimer: I don't work for them or knew anything about them until I read this post but I've been waiting for just this since forever. It has everything I wanted in a tivo.

    Platy

    1. Re:People missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Panasonic DMR-E80HS DVD Burner + 80 HD is out now!

      Here it is for $559

      The newest panasonic models that encode with mpeg2&mpeg4!
      are around the same price as the telly.

      DMR-E100H
      120GB hard drive
      DVD-R 4x / DVD-RAM 2x
      SD / PC Card double slots
      DV input terminal
      1.3 x Playback
      DVD-Audio 2ch output

      DMR-E200H
      160GB hard drive
      DVD-R 4x / DVD-RAM 2x
      EPG
      SD / PC Card double slots
      DV input terminal
      1.3 x Playback
      DVD-Audio 5.1ch output
      Jog/Shuttle remote

    2. Re:People missing the point by ddkilzer · · Score: 1

      Make that $559.95 for the Panasonic DMR-E80HS. (Fixed link.)

  60. Re:It's hot! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    I may have my faults but at least I don't have a tail or a sixth toe on either foot.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  61. hmmmm..could it be all about the guide. by obladioblada · · Score: 1

    I was struck by both the EPG and their data provider(Tribune/Zap2it). I didn't see on their site that they license IPG technology from Gemstar/TV Guide. A Linux based IPG solution might be attractive to cable/satellite operators who need to use their set-top box resources efficiently - especially once they seriously start deploying integrated PVRs. Perhaps it's not about the $899.00 box - maybe the box is a stalking horse to get into the EPG business. Prove it works on this platform, make a relationship with a data provider with deep pockets, and then go after every cable/satellite box in the country.

  62. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then what's that coming out of your a... oh my GOD!

  63. ONEBox Media Center by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this similar to
    ONEBox Media Center?

    http://oneboxmc.com/tour.htm

  64. Re:It's hot! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    out of my a...? what attic? OMG there was a burgular in the house. I caught him and told him to rob your parents basement [re: your "home"]

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  65. Anyone do this with an XBox?? by nzyank · · Score: 1

    I think it's possible, especially with the new Linux no modchip boot if it works as advertised (I haven't tried it yet). Anyone out there working on this or want to? I'm up for it, but not by myself.

  66. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suicidal, aren't you.

  67. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A basement-dwelling mama's boy accusing someone else of being one. That is teh funny!!!!1112

  68. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh. That hurt. You did a round-about way of calling me a troll. . I guess I'll crawl back under my bridge now . Anyways, if you're saying you're not a troll, your Usenet posts contradict you. Unless you really weren't trying, in which case that's just sad.

  69. Re:Not a reply from the original debator, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leggo, fag.

  70. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically, he's not a basement-dwelling momma's boy. You see, his parents' house is built on a slab.

  71. Re:It's hot! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    I live in an upstairs bedroom. There is a difference!!!

    Also I never have lied about it. As you so aptly have traced I've discussed my lack of an entertaining life on usenet.

    Can we be friends? I'm so lonely!

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  72. Funny by edrock200 · · Score: 1

    I submitted this story yesterday morning and it was rejected...go figure.

  73. Re:It's hot! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    I am a troll. Though to some I'm a tolerable troll. Which is more than I can say for you.

    How many shitty crypto libraries have you written lately? That's right, ZERO!. While I have at least written one half-ass shitty backwards crypto library.

    Booyah. Suck it.

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  74. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure there is, nancy boy.
    Kill yourself. It's the only way out.

  75. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How many shitty crypto libraries have you written lately? That's right, ZERO!. While I have at least written one half-ass shitty backwards crypto library.

    Because humanity is defined by the number of shitty crypto libraries one has written. How could have I forgotten that?

    Booyah. Suck it.

    I find your increasing use of homosexual innuendo uncomfortable. Although I take a "live and let live" approach to those who can the man ham, this is a bit close for comfort.

  76. Re:Early GNAA Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I'd carry his babies. This is the best thread I've read on slashdot in ages and ages.

  77. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love a good flamefest as much as the next guy, but that's hitting below the belt. No one wants anyone else to die here, I hope.

  78. GPL violation? by alamut · · Score: 1

    from their FAQ: [http://interact-tv.com/faq.php]

    Q: Can I buy the Telly software separate from the hardware?
    A: No. Currently Telly is sold as a complete unit. The software isn't sold separately. If you have a hardware platform that you would like to run EOS/Telly on, contact our dealer program.

    um...... dare i ask if i can download a tarball?

    1. Re:GPL violation? by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure. Buy the unit and make a formal request in writing for the source code to the GPLed software that you have just purchased in binary form. If requested to do so, provide media (such as a CD-R in modern times, though the GPL mentions tapes) and return postage for that media.

      Once you have said source code, you are free to redistribute it (unmodified or modified) under the terms of the GPL.

      Until you have the binary, you have NO rights to request the source code under the GPL.

      What bothers me most about your comment is the way you think you are somehow entitled to receive the source just because you exist. There is a good balance in the GPL (source needs only be provided to those who have received the binary) and this kind of demand for source code you have no right to receive really puts a black eye on the free software movement.

      Have you even bothered to read and understand the GPL? By the sound of your comment, obviously not. Forget about current practice, pretend you are a lawyer for a bit, and read it. Then wait a few days and read it again. Then wait a few weeks and read it again. It's not a particularly difficult document to read, but like anything it helps to read it multiple times to get a better understanding of it. Any programmer with a modest amount of legal experience should be able to grok it. The GPL is something that anybody serious about writing free software should be quite familiar with. Why trust some schmuck's "Reader's Digest" version of it when you can read the real thing?

    2. Re:GPL violation? by Eric+Smith · · Score: 4, Informative
      Sure. Buy the unit and make a formal request in writing for the source code to the GPLed software that you have just purchased in binary form. [...] Until you have the binary, you have NO rights to request the source code under the GPL. [...] Have you even bothered to read and understand the GPL?
      Have YOU even bothered to read and understand the GPL?

      If they don't provide the source code with the product, then section 3b of the GPL requires them to provide the source code of the GPL'd software to ANY THIRD PARTY, not just those to whom they have distributed the object code. The written offer of source code only has to be provided to the party to whom they distributed the object code, but that offer must be valid for any third party.

      In fact, technically if someone has made a commercial distribution of object code of GPL'd programs, and not accompanied it with either the source code (section 3a) or the offer to provide the source code (section 3b), they are already in violation of the GPL. For noncommercial distribution, there is a third option (section 3c), but that wouldn't apply here.

    3. Re:GPL violation? by fleppir · · Score: 1

      But wait, you are requesting the source of the video implementation and such right?

      They have no requirement to release any software running on the GPL PLATFORM as GPL.

      You can have proprietary code running on Linux.

      --
      I am the Barber of Seville.
    4. Re:GPL violation? by Jimithing+DMB · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'll be damned. It does in fact say third party in section 3b. Thanks!

    5. Re:GPL violation? by isn't+my+name · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'll be damned. It does in fact say third party in section 3b. Thanks!

      HEY!!!

      Dude, this is Slashdot you're posting on. You do understand that you are not supposed to admit you were wrong in a rant? Particularly not so quickly and pleasantly.

      Heck, next thing you know people will start reading the articles. What is the world coming to?

    6. Re:GPL violation? by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I'll be damned. It does in fact say third party in section 3b. Thanks!

      Note that the "third party" in section 3b is required only so that section 3c is acceptable. Of course, it's almost always easiest to apply section 3a instead.

    7. Re:GPL violation? by alamut · · Score: 1

      Boy, getting a /. flame really is as easy as just mentioning the GPL!
      Thanks for your participation in this social experiment.
      btw: what evidence do you have that I am NOT a lawyer?

    8. Re:GPL violation? by alamut · · Score: 1

      Of course they have no requirement to release any of their code as GPL, but it sure leaves a bad taste in my mouth to see them touting a "linux-based" pvr, without even unbundling the software, or acknowledging the contribution of specific people whose work they are selling.

  79. actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm fairly certain that John K. is infact involved with the new R&S on TNN/SpikeTV/Whatever the fuck they're calling it.

    I could be wrong. too lazy to bother to try and find out.

  80. Re:I'm getting pretty good at these: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice. How are you doing those?

  81. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wasn't trying to be cute or anything. I really hope he does it.

  82. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's harsh. How would you feel if you heard the news on talk radio?

  83. Get used to it. There's at least one bonehead here by nzyank · · Score: 1

    Get used to it. I gave up submitting long ago. For your reason (more than once) and also lots of well thought out questions. Waste of time spending hours carefully typing submissions that get rejected, but EVERY SINGLE DAY another rant about software patents or Microsoft security weakness gets accepted.

  84. Is USB faste enough or is there an alternative by nzyank · · Score: 1

    Is the USB on the XBox fast ebough for that? Alternatively is there any other bus access on the XBox fast enough to handle streaming video. I guess what I'm really asking is whether there's a high enough bandwidth access without soldering modchips in (once was enough!).

    1. Re:Is USB faste enough or is there an alternative by Hast · · Score: 1

      Well there is a 100MBit ethernet connection in the back.

      This would however require a secondary PC which does the actual recording, but is remote controlled by the XBox (or other PCs in the home).

      Actually there was a product like this that someone was working on. IIRC the price for the recording box was intended to be about $70.

      If you have the time to make it work I think that the combination of XBox+recording PC would be pretty much ideal as far as price/performance goes. The XBox has high quality component(RGB)and optical 5.1 audio out, as well as a built in DVD. Oh, and last I checked it's really wicked for playing games as well. (Which is what I use mine for.)

  85. "Linux TiVo..." by Jack_Frost · · Score: 1

    TiVo runs on Linux of course.

    It's funny because it's true.

  86. It's HUGE - 16.92" x 5.6" x 17.8" by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    This is a fancy PC desktop case.

    This is NOT a typical size for home entertainment devices. If you "giant" Pioneer reciever "just fits". This is a couple inches bigger.

  87. Games? by dekraved · · Score: 1

    I thought that if I ever got anything Media Center-ish, it would be a Linux box, if only because it would be cheaper and avoid Microsoft's DRM slavery to the media industries. But then I thought that the perfect entertainment center-ish box can better justify a higher price than TiVo if it can also be used to play games. This seems to (unfortunately) make Windows the superior choice. Anybody have arguments in the other direction?

  88. Obligatory statement by UltimateZer0 · · Score: 1
    ...sorry, guys. I'm obligated.

    Could you imagine a beowulf cluster of these?

    --

    --- I'm going to get a score of -1 for this post because the mods are fuckers.

  89. Compare the prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A comparable TIVO would cost you the following:

    TIVO Series2 - $349.00
    Non-transferable lifetime subscription - $299.00
    Network Interface - $100.00
    DVD/CD burner - Unavailable
    TOTAL ------> $748.00

    Telly 80GB DVR - $899.00

    So $150.00 buys you:
    1. Privacy (nobody downloading your viewing habits)
    2. A cd burner
    3. Easy upgrades
    4. Unmatched hackability

    I for one was excited about this box becuae it does give me more freedom. I ABOSLUTELY FSCKN HATE the idea of subscriptions (on top of my already high cable bill) for a TV guide. The idea that one day there will be more ads with TIVO and that it takes an act of god to hack your TIVO are all reasons to consider this.

    Could you do a similar thing for less? Sure, but this is designed to be a consumer device. In terms of cost of ownership, I think it is VERY comparable to the latest TIVO's.

    If the SVCD's are of a good quality (think good quality VHS that doesn't degrade over time) then this box has a place for home video archiving. Also as pointed out there are a lot of future ideas and extensions coming down the line.

    My guess is that this box even supports SSH connections and looks like a Linux box all the way. Sounds like a great deal to me.

    1. Re:Compare the prices... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least get your pricing right!
      The 80hr Tivo current runs $299 with promo codes
      The network interface is a USB->eth0 or USB->wifi, perhaps $10-$30
      The lifetime sub is transferable with the unit, just not from unit-to-unit (lifetime means lifetime of that unit, not of the owner)
      DVD+/-RW Tivos are coming out now that support burning content to said media. They are pricey though ($500 and up).
      You did leave out the Home Media Option for Tivo though, which runs $99 or, under promo $60. Without the HMO, you can't listen to MP3s or move shows around to different Tivos in your home.

      Tivo's great UI, small (quiet!) form factor, and great remote control make up for a lot of the perceived benefits of this other box.

      BTW, you can opt out of Tivo's data collection if you choose via their web site.

      Keep the facts straight. You still have a good case, just not on the points you cited.

  90. Price explained $899 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people may find that $899 is quite expensive. But if you look at the chassis, you'll notice it is a coolermaster atc-610 (or 620, don't remember). It's is one of the most expensive desktop case around. If you had to buy it new, you'll have to pay $200+ (at least where I live).
    This makes me also believe it is a true PC in it (since the unmodified case only accepts micro atx motherboards). So, maybe you can add hd, change video card, ... and most importantly, full access to the hd, which might be very interesting for tweaking it as you want (adding packages, tuning kernel, ...).

    Raph

    1. Re:Price explained $899 by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some people may find that $899 is quite expensive. But if you look at the chassis, you'll notice it is a coolermaster atc-610 (or 620, don't remember). It's is one of the most expensive desktop case around. If you had to buy it new, you'll have to pay $200+ (at least where I live).

      You can buy the Coolermaster ATC-610 on newegg.com for $148 or if you can live without an aluminum finish (black would probably look better in your AV rack anyway) you can buy the ATC-620 version for just $108. Plus power supply of course. I imagine that if they buy signifigant quantities of these cases, they would get a nice volume discount.

      The $899 pricetag is a really rather high for this kind of hardware (a C3 processor??, please), but I guess you pay for the integration.

  91. This device doesn't impress me. by VPN3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For starters, I bought a Ultimate TV unit for DirecTV for about $35 after all the rebates. I know you anti-capitalists want 'freedom' to use digital recorders to record staticy broadcast or analog cable.. Yeah, you do that. I'll live in the 2000's, thank you very much. Any digital satellite service is superior to any cable or broadcast network on the planet in regards to quality, quality, and price. Want to argue about that? Ok. Fine. You have reality issues.

    Secondly, You could build a AMD K7 box, get a lian li mini ATX case (the new pancake fits in with AV components really well), 100 gig drive, ATI all in wonder pro, DVD, and a good sound card for less than this box -- but have greater performance. Plus you'll have access to all the great PC applications and HDTV outputs ($35 dongle required).

    You could also get a used Xbox and a mod chip for 1/5th the price of this thing and get most of the functionality with Xbox Media Player. It also supports HDTV..

    I'd suggest not getting excited and feeding the hype for these over-priced hacks. There's just no excuse to spend 900 bucks on something that doesn't do anything ground-breaking.

    1. Re:This device doesn't impress me. by anubi · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Dear VPN:

      I think you have a lot of us "anti-capitalists" and our open-source fanaticism all wrong. For many of us, the sticking point is *not* price, whether it be music or video recorders. The value is in our own ability to maintain/upgrade/customize whatever we have, and have the confidence that if anything at all goes wrong, we aren't held hostage at bugpoint at someone else's mercy. That's a good way to get raped.

      Its just a philosophy. Some of us are very uncomfortable with the idea that somebody else controls something we have. Its bad enough the government traces us and taxes us on our homes, cars, and jobs. But if there is anything the electrical power brokers in California have taught me, its don't let myself get cornered. Don't let businessmen ever get you in a spot where you have to do whatever they say in order to "protect" your investment. Our California governor Gray Davis made like a nice guy and gave in to all the guys who knew how to play him like a fiddle. Where did that get us? Was that Pro-Capitalism? Or was that greed and control gone horribly wrong?

      I don't like the idea of being a sharecropper.

      Nor do I want to try to build a long-term investment with ephemeral building blocks.

      If its a nice box, well designed, open source, etc, its worth the price. I don't expect to be subsidized by someone else who had a plan to force me into other business with them. I consider myself honest, but I have every expectation they be honest with me. Open source to me means they are willing to be completely honest with me and are holding no surprises. Its all on the table, subject to any verification I feel I need to do. In most cases, I probably won't verify anything at all, but should something not work as I expect, I may have to verify something.

      I wrote another post in another forum regarding my disappointment with a termite contractor. Nowhere did I say I was unhappy about price.. no, I was mostly lamenting on my inability to verify the quality and quantity of termiticide used. I have no problem with paying the man for work done, but when I have a fast one pulled on me, it really pisses me off. Do you think it would minimize the number of "fast ones" a termite contractor could pull on the public if he knew that the product he used could be verified? How would it look in a jury trial should one of his customers, who discovered his house had been "treated" with water asked the company to assume the costs of replacing the termite-damaged lumber in his house? Or, am I just being "anti-capitalist" here by suggesting that someone's work be open for verification?

      I am delighted to see this in Linux, as I fundamentally do not trust Microsoft. Nor do I trust that mechanic who claims he's going to work on my car, but goes to great lengths to make damn sure I can not observe nor verify his work. And I don't trust that termite guy either. ( But if he had given me a sample in my jug, then upon my suspicion something's wrong, I sent it off to my friend, and he found pyrethrins in the proper strength, my opinion of that contractor today would be completely different. )

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    2. Re:This device doesn't impress me. by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

      The connections here don't make a lot of sense to me. Yes, Open Source is the correct path. But, paying $900 for an open source solution is not the way to go when you can get a $35 device that does almost the same thing, well does all the 'expensive' features this does.

      Scroll down a few responses and you see where someone quotes from the manual that you can't even record while watching. That's ludicrous, my $35 UTV unit has dual tuners and can record two shows at once while you watch another pre-recorded program. Plus, if you are watching a program and say, the woman comes home, you can hit record and it'll record from the beginning of the episode (assuming you tuned in at or before it's start) for her. Basically, they developed a proprietary device that does much more in the interest of making money off it for a few years before Open Source people duplicate the work legally. I'll help fund the popularity of current technology whislt looking forward to my superior open source solution when it actually arrives.

      I won't go around touting that anything open source is better than anything closed when it's not. Not all great works come from the community. Most great works appear to begin with an individual idea, adopted by corporations, then oss developers work slowly to reproduce the work over time. Geeze, just look at Linux and how user friendly it'd be for grandma to setup for dial-up Internet access. It's no even as basic as setting up Windows 3.11 yet, thus could be argued as being 10+ years behind in the 'user friendly' department. How long has the OSS community been talking/coding/arguing over how to make Linux with a graphical interface simple enough for the masses? I've been following it since 94 and it seems we've made it as far as covering up shell scripted installations with a GUI. wooo.

      I know the justification of any Open Source solution will always get a +5 kamra, which is sad in the fact that pushing Open Source is good all the time, just not good when it costs ten times as much as does less.

      Instead of supporting these over-priced soltutions, support the Freevo and other free solutions.

      This is much like saying "I'll pay any sum of money to see the source, however menial the technology is". I'm sorry but I don't care about the code in a set top box, nor the code in my automobile's computer system. I just want the thing to do what it was advertised to do, and I do trust a company like UTV to take care of it. I do, on the other hand, care about code that concerns my income (ie, servers I administer for a living).

      I guess what I am trying to say is, that, well.. I have enough code to worry about to deal with, or care about, the code in every device in my home. It becomes a waste of time after a while.

      Also comes the issue of this being a small company selling the hack jobs. What happens if you buy one, then need some support for it and they are gone? It's much more likely with a rinky dink linux company than a huge company. I'd prefer my support to be "Hey, my box quit working! Can we RMA this one and send me another ASAP?" than "Hello, yes, Okay. I'm in bash now. Ok, what processes should I kill/start? Hmm. This sure feels a lot like I'm at work, but dealing with someone else's mess. Are you sure you can't just send me another box? I really want to record Farscape next thursday.. :("

    3. Re:This device doesn't impress me. by anubi · · Score: 1
      Thanks for replying. I learn a lot from debating a point of view.

      If you throw out the idea the $35 box was a plan to force you into some other moneymaking scheme, that box is certainly the better buy. Your box is definitely a result of a more focused design of a PVR box than the box mentioned in the article, which is exactly what you state it was - a preliminary attempt at integrating the hardware and software for a linux-based PVR. But, still, I like the open-source aspects - and would actually pay extra for that. Much in the same vein that I paid extra for service manuals when I bought my first ( and only ) car. I definitely agree with you that a lot of work has to be done - we've barely scratched the surface of all there is to do. Your comment about making a grandma-friendly box is right on. I have long wondered whats keeping the boxes as complicated to install as they are - I figured the problem was Copyright Law, and once someone does an interface/driver a certain way, everyone else has gotta do it different so they don't step on any toes. As if the light bulb base got patented, and everybody selling light bulbs had to use an array of special sockets and adapters to comply with Copyright Law. Superfluous, complicated, but that would be what it took to be legal.

      And, as far as your comment about already having all the code you want to deal with and could care less about the code in your DVR or car, you understandably have just about as much interest in debugging your DVR or car as I have in performing spectroscopy to verify the termite man put the correct stuff down. As I indicated, I really don't want to have to verify anything, but should I *need* to, I want that option available. It just keeps people honest. Personally, I would like to verify my termiticide application because of a swarm of ants which still cover my cat food bowl at night, said trail of ants going right into the crack in the slab between the patio and house, that I witnessed being given a sound soaking of what was presented to me as termiticide.

      In the case of the DVR, I want verification/change rights because I want to protect myself against them making some change on their end which renders my box and investment therein useless. If they want to stop sending the program guide, fine, I'll stop sending in the fee for said service, but I expect the box to continue to function manually. I feel I paid for that hardware and I feel entitled to use it. If the box stops working, I want to know I can access whats left of it and run it plain vanilla mode, or use it for something else.

      And I know what happens if I need support for something and they are gone. If it was something proprietary, forget it, best off bust the thing open and see if there's anything at all useful inside before you put it in the trash can. But I have many things the manufacturer has long since gone, yet I continue to use the product. I have a toaster older than I am, but it used standard parts. Even the nichrome wire on its heating coils was standard gauge, and I was able to fabricate one on the original mica insulator. I have also had to open up old unsupported software in a debugger (SoftIce/TurboDebugger) to remove code that was fouling up the printer ports and rendering a Zip drive useless. Sans source code, it was a lengthy process.

      I guess proprietary would be fine if I knew the vendor would always support me, but that has not been the case with me. I need options in the case he does not want to support me. Quite possibly its because I speak as a small guy who has little monetary influence. So, what I lack in wealth, I try to make up in ingenuity. If they try to force me in a corner, I find some way of doing what needs to be done - without them.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  92. Great idea, needs to cost $299 or less. by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's a good idea, but about 3x too expensive and physically too big.

    When somebody makes this the size of a small DVD player and sells it for $249 at Wal-Mart, then it will take off.

  93. Also consider SnapStream by MWales · · Score: 1

    I built a WinXP box for less than $300. SnapStream can be had with promotion/coupon for $50. It gives great results, even better if you buy a Hauppage PVR card with built in MPEG2 enocoder. $900 seems a bit steep.

  94. Amazing new technology called reading by drix · · Score: 1

    Grreat, just what the world needed: yet another way to record American Gladiator reruns, Springer, and all the other trash that's on television. I find TiVo fetishism and this culture of passive, TV-facilitated vegetation disturbing. Here's an idea: pick up a book. The Penguin classics series runs me 2.41 at my local bookseller. For roughly 1/200th the price of a PVR you'll get a vastly more entertaining and provocative product with all the same features. Pause it wherever you want. Keep a copy for archival purposes when you're finished. Instantly fast forward to any point. No commercials. Accessible from any room of the house over sneakernet. It's ingenious, I say--a must have Christmas present for any geek this season.

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    1. Re:Amazing new technology called reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that old must have awefully noisy fans.

    2. Re:Amazing new technology called reading by RembrandtX · · Score: 1

      Hmm . yes .. because no one here might use a ReplayTV or Tivo to record things on PBS or the history channel.

      No one might actually use a device to watch higher quality tv .. as opposed to the crap that the networks throw at us during prime time and expect us to like .. or not .. it doesnt matter .. thats whats on.

      With this post your insinuating that folks who, gasp, watch tv . or even worse .. want to intelligantly PLAN what tv they want to watch .. are idiots.

      Personally, I read 2-3 books a week .. easy .. and I still dig the history channel.

      As far as PVRs go your missing the whole point.

      With my ReplayTV, I can record the shows I want to watch .. to be watched when I have the time to. Meaning I don't have to waste idiot time waiting for the current show to end .. etc. I don't have to watch friends reruns at 7:30 because thats the only time i have free to turn the tv on. I can watch what I want to watch , when I want to watch it.

      Of course, the usefullness of this is a lot less when you have gov't sponsored TV. or 4 (now five) channels.

      --

      --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  95. All-in-one devices are the work of Satan himself. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    If you've ever owned one before, you're going to kick yourself in the face when one of the parts breaks and takes the rest of it with it. I'm sorry, but the people looking to buy this already have a really nice DVD player to begin with. If you want to replace your server, this already means you have one, why would you? There is no point.The DVD writer is a good idea, but id also like to have that seperate so when it dies my machine isn't crippled. Sending these things in for warranty repairs is going to take your entire world off line - F That!

  96. I e-mailed them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yesterday, I e-mailed those guys, got a very friendly and enthousiastic mail back. I asked them about:
    - Time-shifting, it's coming soon when they incorporate a better Mpeg encoder.
    - PAL, it's also high on their agenda.

    Furthermore, they're considering to sell the software separately from the hardware, but this might take some time still... they're currently inventarising what hardware would have to be supported, etc. Also the price would be very fair. They mentioned $75 as an indication.

    Overall, got a good impression from em.

  97. only $900? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like a deal, oh, wait, you cant pause live tv even? Something my free mythtv box can do just fine.
    How are you gonna try and sell a nearly thousand dollar pvr w/o the ability to do something as basic as pause live tv, sure the bells and whistles are nice but on a normal day youll want to use the pause live tv more than you will to burn a dvd.

  98. You cannot watch while you record! by DukeyToo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the manual, page 17: "While Telly is recording, Telly's TV window goes blank and you can't watch TV. You can use other Telly features like the music library, photo library or TellyPortal."

    Arg. Sounds like a step back from my VCR.

    Otherwise, the idea is great, the interface looks wonderful. Just a little work needed on the TV watching features and the price.

    --
    Most writers regard truth as their most valuable possession, and therefore are most economical in its use - Mark Twain
    1. Re:You cannot watch while you record! by msanchez426 · · Score: 1

      I asked about this, here is the answer I got:

      "...this is due to software based MPEG4 encoding and the
      CPU overhead. Future versions of the product will have MPEG2 HW encoding which will allow pause live TV. We opted to support MPEG4 encoding since it is more flexible, lower bit rate, but high quality and this will work better when we stream video over a home network."

      So not now, but yes in the future... shall we overflow them with requests?

  99. Doesn't Pause Live TV by dnadig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's the nail in the coffin on this one. I couldn't believe it when I read it. TO skip commercials, you have to record an entire program, then watch it.

    Pricewise it's right about on the money (read some of the other posts making comparisons). It's not as cheap as some used POS Tivo or Replay, but compared to buying the comparable Tivo w/ subscription and a DVD player, it's pretty close.

    The problem is that its not a true home theatre PC - It's clearly not designed to push hi-def displays, doesn't mention anything about pre-tweaked resolutions etc... The folks who are going to buy something like this want the perfect box, and this isn't it, so they end up just building it themselves, and (here come the flames) the near universal consensus is that XP is currently the best way to drive a HTPC - vastly more options for Codecs, tweakers, etc... Continuous stable driver support for all the mpeg2 encoders and high end audio cards, etc...

    You CAN do this with Linux, sure. You CAN do anything with Linux, but sometimes Linux is not actually the best tool for the job.

  100. Build the same machine for ~$450 by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

    What a joke, you can build the same machine from off the shelf components available from Newegg for less than $450. Observe:

    Case - Coolermaster ATC-620C - $108
    Powersupply - Fortron FSP200SNV - $25
    Motherboard - Via C3M266-L - $64
    Processor - Intel Celeron 1.3GHz - $45
    Hard Drive - Seagate 80Gb - $81
    CDRW - MSI DragonWriter - $38
    Memory - All Components 256MB DDR - $33
    Tuner - ATI TV Wonder - $63

    That's all that is in the Telly. Actually, this configuration should be somewhat faster than the C3 based telly. Most of the work is in the integrated Via motherboard. If you can buy the parts to build a superior pc for $457, iTV can probably build the Telly for $400 at most. Save your dimes if you want something like this, and build it yourself. Put MythTV on it and you have a great system.

    While I can appreciate the work iTV has done on this product, $900 for this machine is highway robbery. Sure you pay for integration, but is that integration worth $500 to you? I think I'll pass and stick with DIY and open source.

  101. Digital cable box by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    I see no mention of an IR blaster (or campatible) unit sold with this, or even the option for it. If it won't AUTOMATICALLY tuen my cable box on, tune to the correct channel, and record the show, then it's just an expensive digital VCR. I'll use my VHS, thank you very much.

    1. Re:Digital cable box by notter · · Score: 1

      RTFM

      http://interact-tv.com/TellyUG.pdf

      Page 57

  102. It's really not that high... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have a look at this page: http://pvrhw.goldfish.org/tiki-page.php?pageName=r h9pvr250
    for all the hardware this guy used. Then go out to your favorite parts site and price them. It still comes up just over 800 bucks.

    1. Re:It's really not that high... by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

      None of the systems in the hardware section of that page are remotely like the Telly device. See the post I made earlier for details for a device of similar capabilities to the Telly. If you don't like the ATI tuner, add a hundred dollars for the Wintv PVR-250. Still a heck of a lot lower than $800. And keep in mind that the prices I found were retailer prices. A company building machines would be getting OEM pricing, so it looks even more like a rip off to me.

  103. Why so expensive? by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    Why would I spend $900 on a PC that has to be maintained and then I still have to shell out extra for a DVD burner and hope they properly add support for it in my lifetime?

    I can spend $500 and just buy a DVD recorder, plug my VCR and Cable box into it, and hit the record button. It is programmable the same way a VCR is, and while that's not as fancy as a TiVO, it worked fine for me over the last 15 years of VCR recording.

    Unless they develop clever software like TiVO has, that learns your viewing habits and searches for moved showtimes (which you need a taxonomy for -- hence the service charge)... there's really no point.

  104. Re: translation of the above by TheLoneGundam · · Score: 1

    Sorry - no translation. Babelfish doesn't do Cockney babble.

  105. Re:It's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would laugh very, very hard.
    Like this: AH-HAHAHAHAHA!!
    Because I'd find it genuinely funny.

    Then I'd probably get some nachos.

    And no, I wouldn't choke on them.
    That kind of thing only happens in the movies.

    I'll live to be an old man and every time I think about the amazing man-ham-canning tomstdenis and his (hopefully) grisly suicide, I'll laugh so hard that my dentures will probably fall into my gin.

  106. Closed Captioning Support by loo_hoo_ser · · Score: 1

    My question to Interact-TV via their web site:

    My question is regarding the Telly MC1000 Home Entertainment
    Server. Does the recording and playback support closed captioning
    embedded in the NTSC video data stream (line 21 data aka EIA-608)? What
    about pass through, is the same VBI data preserved as live TV is watched?

    This is crucial for hearing impaired users.

    Thank you.

    Their response:

    Hello William,

    This is a good question. Currently it does not keep the line 21 data
    intact from recording to playback. Passthrough will keep it intact.

    We will add this to our feature requests.

    Regards,
    Ken

    --
    Ken Fuhrman
    Interact-TV Inc.

  107. How shoddy is that? by macraig · · Score: 1

    The very first paragraph of their site's index page has an obvious spelling error. Good webmasters must REALLY be hard to find these days?