Slashdot Mirror


TRON: The Unknown Open-Source?

jordandeamattson writes "Over on CNN there is a very interesting article about Tron, an open-source real-time operating system from Japan first developed and distributed in the early 1980s. The claim is that it is more widely distributed than Windows (in some 3 billion devices world-wide), that the developer (Ken Sakamura, a University professor) would be worth mucho if he had just charged for it, and that Microsoft/U.S. goverment used trade rules (Super 301) to block it adoption by schools in Japan. Check it out for an interesting read and a 'what might have been ...'" (Here's a previous mention of Tron from March about MontaVista's work to combine it with Linux.)

437 comments

  1. Tron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I don't give a damn about operating systems, but those cybercycles were 1337.

    1. Re:TRON? by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      TROFF isn't an OS, it's where the Windows developers spend their days rather than coding...or is that trough?

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    2. Re:TRON? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      TROFF is not TROUGH.

      It's TROFF!

    3. Re:Tron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Tron. He fights for the Users.

    4. Re:TRON? by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Dude, I knew that back in 1980...I guess sarcasm is dead after all.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    5. Re:TRON? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      Actually, I caught it. I just wanted an excuse to post the workings of an insanely depricated, yet heartwarming, programming command. Man, those were the days...

    6. Re:TRON? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      TROFF isn't an operating system, it's a text formatting command.
      $ which troff
      /usr/bin/troff
    7. Re:TRON? by jstott · · Score: 1
      So, where's the TROFF operating system?

      I realize your joking, but in a twisted sort of way, AT&T Unix is the troff operating system. The original unix killer-app was ROFF and its derivatives (including troff). I've always assumed that that's why the man pages are still done in troff--it was the obvious choice originally and there's been too big an investment (in man-hours) to switch to anything else.

      -JS

      --
      Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
    8. Re:TRON? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      The original unix killer-app was ROFF and its derivatives

      Wasn't it decended from RUNOFF*** (pre-1970) on Dartmouth Time-Sharing?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    9. Re:TRON? by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Heheh ;-)

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    10. Re:TRON? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So, where's the TROFF operating system?"

      And in a moment only Pavlov could come to grips with, everybody simultaneously snorted.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  2. First Post by UltimateZer0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tron is an OS? I thought Tron was a simple program, written only to destroy the MCP.

    --

    --- I'm going to get a score of -1 for this post because the mods are fuckers.

    1. Re:First Post by jkrise · · Score: 1

      Tron is an OS? I thought Tron was a simple program, written only to destroy the MCP.

      Well... if you think an OS has to occupy 2GB of your disk space, and lots of bloatware, spyware, adware and malware, you'd be disappointed with TRON, or other Japanese products.

      These Japs keep it simple, and their products are great. I still think a good WindowsXP type of OS can be built for less than 30MB - no registry, active directory, Kerberos and all that crap.

      -

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    2. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that you fall on the younger side of the /. age distribution. Please see this.

    3. Re:First Post by vasqzr · · Score: 1

      When I first boot 2K it takes 42MB. Close enough. Besides, RAM is like 2 cents a MB

    4. Re:First Post by schon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tron was a simple program, written only to destroy the MCP

      No, actually, Tron was written to shut down programs that perform illegal operations. When he wrote TRON, Allan Bradley didn't even know that MCP was performing illegal operations.

    5. Re:First Post by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Really, I always thought it was part of the tron/troff pair. As in TRace ON, but that's probably just on my Model I.

    6. Re:First Post by TCaptain · · Score: 4, Funny
      No, actually, Tron was written to shut down programs that perform illegal operations.

      So it IS supposed to be a Microsoft killer then...

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    7. Re:First Post by smclean · · Score: 1

      He's talking about disk space, not memory.

      --

      "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

    8. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The TRON project covers much more than just the operating system, but everything from the hardware to the networking of computers. The project makes specifications, not the actual code.

    9. Re:First Post by Cecil · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would like to order some 1024MB PC3200 DDR. Where do I send my $20? :P

    10. Re:First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, in that case disk space is about $0.09 per MB.

    11. Re:First Post by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Also on the IBM PC and the Commodore 16.

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    12. Re:First Post by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      OK, in that case disk space is about $0.09 per MB

      $0.09/MB? You're getting ripped. I can sell you 30GB drives for $0.04/MB ($1200 each)! I'll even do it buy 2, get 1 free if you act now!

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    13. Re:First Post by cshark · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'll do you one better. MinuetOS is a full windowing OS in less than 2MB. http://www.menuetos.org/

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    14. Re:First Post by Grax · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amiga booted a 32 bit multitasking operating system from a floppy back in 1985. So I would have to agree with you.

    15. Re:First Post by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      These Japs keep it simple, and their products are great. I still think a good WindowsXP type of OS can be built for less than 30MB - no registry, active directory, Kerberos and all that crap.

      Well, I think you're an idiot. I don't even see how you can have a 'windows like' OS without having a registry, it'd be like having a Unix without and /etc directory. I also don't see why having a registry would take up that much space anyway. Not any more space then having separate .ini files like win32 or text config files like most Unix systems. (in fact, win3.1 did include a simple registry, but it wasn't used for all configin' like today).

      Active directory? Well, who knows. Lots of people would need something like this as an add on anyway (but not everyone). And Kerberos? Well, most unix implementations support kerberos and SSH anyway, and that doesn't take up much space either.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  3. TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TRON is an "embedded" operating system running inside microprocessors, which control electronic devices ranging from mobile phones to fax machines and even kitchen appliances.

    Micro$oft Windows doesn't control electronic devices ranging from mobile phones to fax machines and even kitchen appliances, as far as I know, right??? (I hope it doesn't anyways)

    How can you compare the two?

    1. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


      How can you compare the two?

      Because this is Slashdot, silly! :)

      In reality, comparison against another embedded/tiny OS would have made more sense; QNX for example.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Micro$oft Windows doesn't control electronic devices ranging from mobile phones to fax machines and even kitchen appliances, as far as I know, right??? (I hope it doesn't anyways)

      How can you compare the two?


      Hi, you must be new to Slashdot.

    3. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by foooo · · Score: 1

      Windows Embedded and Windows CE would compare just fine. (sorry to dash your hopes, but it's in use too... just not a monopoly in that market yet)

      ~foooo

    4. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by makapuf · · Score: 2, Informative

      By RTFA and reading that TRON can run on normal PC. It could also have been the OS of choice for todays peecees if arm-twisting hadn't happened.

    5. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by Trigun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But Tron was developed in the 80's. MS and the US Government blocked it in 1989, when MS didn't have an embedded platform. ... United States threatened to designate TRON as an unfair trade barrier under its Super 301 trade law when it learned of plans by the Japanese government to use the software for computers in schools.

      Did Bill have that much clout even then?

    6. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by redheaded_stepchild · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ok, I know this is offtopic, but here goes: Windows has announced the convergence of three of their product lines: Windows NT, CE, and ME. They're going to call it Windows CEMENT. Guaranteed frozen, all the time.

      --
      Don't use the Troll mod just because you disagree with me.
    7. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by torpor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can't compare the two, but you can compare the result.

      Microsoft wants PC technology in everything, and this is clear with their Embedded PC ("flavour of the month name") OS'es, TabletPC's, MS' "home of the future", Pocket Computing rubbish.

      TRON was supposed to go the other way around: embedded computers in everything, talking to each other using common languages/protocols/API's from the beginning, based on open specifications.

      Actually, the reason TRON failed was because Gates and his American computer technology cronies have been working against it for years.

      It was Gates who screwed MSX - and MSX was supposed to be a good test of the TRON technology system - it was Gates and the US Defense industry who has kept the American embedded markets from using TRON systems in the 80's and 90's, and it is Gates who now tries to get a Microsoft operating system to do what TRON has been doing for years: run in every device imaginable, communicate freely with all other devices.

      TRON would have been here, properly, as E-TRON: the worlds largest computing system, by 1995/96.

      Unfortunately, it has been a looong battle for the TRON guys.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    8. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on now! How can we bitch about Slashdot being biased if we start reading the linked articles and using "logic" before we post?

    9. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True enough.

      Tron was(and is) a fantastic architecture. It was designed in a union of operation system, system service APIs and hardware architecture.

      From the start up the planned for a 32 bit system(at that time common micro processores where 6502 and 8088 and Z80), so the first kernals and services where emulating the 32 bit architecture while the final 32 bit processors run that same kernal native.

      The question MITI was asking the japanese industry was: what and where do you want to compute in the future? And then they descided HOW to compute in the future. And then they crafted an OS which found parallel architectures in Transputers and in modern distributed architectures.

      Basicly they used the opposite approach others use: instead of emulating old systems with actual hardware and limit the actual hardware by that, they emulate future systems.

      Instread of putting money into hardware, albeit the hardware was early planned, they put money into the intellectual challange how to get super expensive features(in terms of MIPS) of a super cool OS done ellegantly in cheap hardware. With the goal of having superiour hardware 20 years later ... and the OS allready mature when the hardware finally is available.

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1
      Did Bill have that much clout even then?

      That would imply that he has clout now. Financially, sure... technologically, no. There isn't a tech worth his salt who would say that Bill Gates knows much more about computers than they armchair techie that watches TechTV and thinks it's better than Slashdot.

    11. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps because they claim both to be an OS ?

    12. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by plugger · · Score: 1

      Some kind of Windows powers my mate's mobile phone. And yes, it is buggy. Several times I have answered my phone only to hear 'Shit, f*cking POS phone'. Looks nice though, and the ability to play samples is cool.

    13. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by steve_l · · Score: 1

      I saw a refrigerator in Fryes that had an embedded win9x box and monitoring doing added value stuff: tv, music, message board, web browsing.

      I know it is win9x as for a test we flipped the power and scandisc came up on reboot...

    14. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe it does. I've heard there's also at least one car maker and one branch of the US military now using an embedded version of Windows. I'm not sure if it's the same as Windows CE though... and it doesn't crash and isn't bloated.

      Windows can be pretty solid on any platform as long as you tune the thing and have good housekeeping skills. You UNIX/Linux/MacOS people have it easier since being lazy isn't as detrimental to your OS as it is to Windows.

    15. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by zaphod_es · · Score: 1

      I saw a refrigerator in Fryes that had an embedded win9x box... This is madness! Windows is not stable enough for mission critical operations. This could lead to warm beer or even worse. Where will it all end?

    16. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That sounds more like someone's extreme case mod to me. Did you check to see if there was an overclocked 486 running in the freezer?

    17. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

      Well, you can get Windows inside gas pumps, mobile phones, PDAs, PVRs, DVRs, tablets, computers, servers, laptops, and photocopiers. :)

    18. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by swillden · · Score: 1

      Basicly they used the opposite approach others use: instead of emulating old systems with actual hardware and limit the actual hardware by that, they emulate future systems.

      It's worth pointing out that OS/400, the OS used on the IBM AS/400 series, did the same thing. I don't recall the details of the paper I read on it a few years ago but, basically, OS/400 provides a virtual 128-bit processor that originally ran on 32-bit machines and now runs on 64-bit machines.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    19. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by steve_l · · Score: 1

      you are correct -this is truly a wrong thing to do. I think they were smart enough to relegate windows to being the GUI for the front panel, and not do important things like keeping alcohol solutions below critical temperatures.

    20. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      Windows can be pretty solid on any platform as long as you tune the thing and have good housekeeping skills

      Is that a euphamism for "reformating and reinstalling"?

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    21. Re:TRON is an "embedded" operating system... by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 1

      reformatting, reinstalling, shutting down non-vital services, hacking the registry... it's all good.

  4. Home page by makapuf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sure, there's google, but there seems to be the TRON OS home page, in english.

    Besides, what devices run than OS ? anyone know ?

    1. Re:Home page by WillAdams · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fascinating, especially the last line of the article where the Prof. notes that he runs this OS on his computer at home (and doesn't do Windows).

      It'd be interesting to d/l this and compare it to QNX.

      Unfortunately, the ftp.tron.org site wants a username and password (and anonymous / myemailname@domain.com doesn't work)

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    2. Re:Home page by NuMessiah · · Score: 5, Informative

      OK, but there is more interesting info at:

      TRON Project Information

      and

      TRON Web

      also in english :)

      bb4now,
      PMC

      --
      we-go-we-fly
    3. Re:Home page by jkrise · · Score: 1, Funny

      Besides, what devices run than OS ? anyone know ?

      More important, does it contain SCOde? If it doesn't, well that's great news. We can make it run on any device.
      -

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    4. Re:Home page by Artifex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks for the additional links!

      Unfortunately, I still don't see any place to just download some code :) Off the tron.org English page, the closest I come is the link to the T-Engine site, that points to developers kits that cost over US$1K.

      Sure, I know Open Source doesn't always mean free, but there ought to be an engine emulator you can get for free or more cheaply, right?

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    5. Re:Home page by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful
      We can make it run on any device

      No you cannot. While Nucleus itself may be free, the toolchain and the derivations tuned to specific platforms cost an arm, a leg and a prostetic.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    6. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 5, Informative


      Pretty much any Japanese electronic musical instrument maker has used TRON. Yamaha keyboards run it, or derivatives of it, I've been told. That will change now though, with Yamaha's recent announcement that they'll be using Linux.

      I've followed TRON since I was a kid hacker in the early 80's, and have watched its use in the industry with eager anticipation of the day it becomes more widely known about in the tech sector.

      When Linux came into existence (I've been a Linux user since *day one* of its existence), I decided I need not stay current with TRON, which is a shame because I think a lot of the goals of TRON (E-TRON, actually, its supposed to be called) are achievable right now with Linux in the embedded world.

      If ever there was proof needed of just how destructive Microsoft has been for the computer industry, it is the fact that hardly anyone in the Western Tech sector (sillicon valley) knows about TRON and what this project was supposed to achieve... and, actually, still is capable of achieving... The project is based around shared source, completely open amongst competing hardware manufacturers.

      Embedded kernels running in every electronic device known to man, capable of talking to each other discretely and without human interaction, to create a sort of 'Boewulf cluster' of embedded systems capable of sharing loads and processing power.

      TRON was a kick ass project. And everything we've wanted to do with TRON, we can now do with Linux.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    7. Re:Home page by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      A bunch of things run this OS. Like mentioned in the article, a lot of embedded systems- cameras, phones, appliances, cars, etc. But, TRON and BTRON also power desktop computers and PDAs. The BrainPad TiPo is the only PDA I know of which runs *TRON, but there is probably others.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    8. Re:Home page by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Interesting

      TRON was a kick ass project. And everything we've wanted to do with TRON, we can now do with Linux.

      Linux was a kick ass project. And everything we've wanted to do with Linux, we can now do with some flavor of Windows. There is no reason that what people do with Linux can't be done on Windows CE or desktop Windoze. Do we simply toss out Linux as an option because we could do the same on Windows? Do we simply toss out TRON as an option because we could do the same with Linux?

      Yes, in everwhere but Japan, we'll probably never touch TRON and its family. It's all in Japanese, built by Japanese engineers for Japanese people. Which isn't to day localization to English and other languages can't be done, but with all the competition, I can't see Ken-san thinking an English version of BTRON is the most important thing for the TRON world right now. Which is a shame- BTRON is a pretty sweet system, MicroScript beating the pants off of shell scripting any day. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    9. Re:Home page by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1
      (I've been a Linux user since *day one* of its existence)

      At first, I thought you were full of crap. Another little 1337 h4x0r on slashdot who just managed to get SuSe to install on his computer and was trying to act big and tough by posting on slashdot.

      Then I saw your Slashdot UID *bows down and offers a Jolt Cola Sacrafice*

    10. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I've been a Linux user since *day one* of its existence)

      Linus? Is that you?

    11. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been a Linux user since *day one* of its existence

      First of all, unless your name is Linus, that is a bold-faced lie.

      Second of all, do you really think you are impressing people by claiming you are geeky enough to use linux longer than them? Your other sweaty pear-shaped loser nerd friends might think you are cool, but that doesnt say much.

    12. Re:Home page by jason0000042 · · Score: 1

      Well I've always wanted to learn japanese. Now here's some motivation.

      --
      i don't like my old sig.
    13. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes- he has a low UID. That only means he has been a virgin longer than you.

    14. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1

      I hate Jolt. Give me a Dr. Pepper and I'll forget that you even exist. :)

      Seriously though, its true: I've still got my minix mailbox archives, which includes that very post from that fateful day.

      What a great afternoon for me that has turned out to be!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    15. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 5, Interesting


      Sorry, but no. There are *thousands* of reasons we can't do with Windows what we can do with Linux.

      Those thousands of reasons are called "lines of code". The code for Microsoft Windows will never be available - and for this reason alone, we can never do with Windows what we can do with TRON. Or Linux.

      I'm a hardware manufacturer.

      I want to run a decent operating system on hardware CPU xxx_yyy. CPU xxx_yyy is pretty important to me: as a hardware manufacturer, for hardware manufacturer reasons.

      I can: a) see if Microsoft Windows CE supports it, and if not either give up and use the CPU they want me to use or pay thousands for them to support my xxx_yyy CPU, or b) port Linux to it myself freely in a couple of days.

      No comparison. We can not do with Windows today what we have been able to do with TRON for 20 years.

      And, FYI, you've got TRON running in your home, somewhere, if you're an average American consumer with credit cards that you use. Every American uses TRON, somehow, at least 2 or 3 times a day.

      Without even knowing it.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    16. Re:Home page by KevCo · · Score: 1

      Bah, 458. Back in the first days of user IDs most of us were leary to create accounts. UIDs? UIDs? We don' need no steeking UIDs!

      Eventually I think I created one to be able to store my preferences IIRC.

    17. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And everything we've wanted to do with Linux, we can now do with some flavor of Windows.

      With linux, I can get the source and modify it, I can resell/redistribute it, etc. This without breaking laws and without costs.

    18. Re:Home page by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      pffffft- I used to use Minix too. Still have a bunch of 5.25" floppies for my XT (long gone), which I should really toss one of these days. But being a Linux user since day one? Since the first release, sure. Or, since the first time Linus may have shared it before the first release. But day one- in Linus's bedroom, hacking out the first Linux code? C'mon man, you may have had the forsight to actually create account those years ago, but it'll take some flashier credentials to establish you as Linus's day-one monkey. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    19. Re:Home page by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1
      When I was an undergrad, I worked for Dr. Mann at the University of Pennsylvania. He was colloborating with the Japanese on the Kamiokande neutrino detector.


      A big part of the job involved lots of fortran code to sift through the enormous amount of data. Much of the code was written on the japanese side. And while the characters were ascii, and the logical structure and keywords were all fine, the variable names and comments were all japanese words, which made the code very hard to follow!

      --
      It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
    20. Re:Home page by CaseyB · · Score: 1

      Sour grapes. Pbbbbt!

    21. Re:Home page by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      What does having Credit Cards have to do with using TRON in my home? Please give details.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    22. Re:Home page by uberdave · · Score: 1

      My guess would be the credit card swipe machines used in bars, restaurants, convenience stores, gas stations, hardware stores, movie theatres, tourist traps, ...[thousands of examples snipped]... and of course, miniature golf courses.

    23. Re:Home page by mph · · Score: 1
      My guess would be the credit card swipe machines used in bars, restaurants, convenience stores, gas stations, hardware stores, movie theatres, tourist traps, ...[thousands of examples snipped]... and of course, miniature golf courses.
      But I don't live in a convenience store, gas station, or any of those other places. How to people with credit cards use TRON in their home? That was his question.
    24. Re:Home page by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 1

      When Linux came into existence (I've been a Linux user since *day one* of its existence....


      Linus? Is that you?

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    25. Re:Home page by DoomHaven · · Score: 1

      Heh, that is exactly the reason why I created this account :D

      I remember, back in the good ol' days, before user IDs...

      --
      "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
    26. Re:Home page by holt · · Score: 1

      My guess is that you used those credit cards to buy some hardware of Japanese origin, and that hardware runs TRON in some way.

    27. Re:Home page by doctor_no · · Score: 5, Informative

      TRON today basically has a monopoly on most embedded devices in the world; if you you've used a cell phone, digital camera, driven a car, opened a fridge, played a movie on your VCD/DVD player, turned on your TV, you've likely used TRON in one form or another.

      In fact the TRON engine standards group(T-Engine) has more than 100 members worldwide including Fujitsu, Fuji Electric, Hitachi, Kyocera, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, MIPS, NEC, NTT, NTT DATA, NTT DoCoMo, RSA Security, Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology, Sony, Sharp, Toshiba, Yamaha, Yazaki, and Yokogawa Digital Computer Corp, Toyota, Honda, etc.

      Until Linux becomes a fully real-time OS it's unlikely that it'll replace TRON out of the embedded market.

    28. Re:Home page by t0ny · · Score: 0, Troll
      If ever there was proof needed of just how destructive Microsoft has been for the computer industry, it is the fact that hardly anyone in the Western Tech sector (sillicon valley) knows about TRON and what this project was supposed to achieve... and, actually, still is capable of achieving... The project is based around shared source, completely open amongst competing hardware manufacturers.

      How completely evil of them. They go and make a successful desktop OS which standardizes most of the world onto the same platform, while making an American company which employs thousands, and enabled the tech boom of the late 90s to happen.

      Its completely evil of them to bring computers to the masses, and tout having people be able to run the same software, document formats, etc. We should all be forced to be a linux guru if we so much as want to LOOK at a computer.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    29. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll also be missing $7500 Cdn.

    30. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1

      Umm... 'day one' for me means the day it was released to public, and yes, that would be the post to the minix list, which google now shows me was 8/25/91 and I recall as being a very hot weekend in LA, which is why I was in my computer room, in air-conditioning, reading my e-mail.

      I've had a box - many times more than just one, in fact - in my life running Linux since that day. Okay, well, maybe the Monday after 'day one', since I had to steal more RAM for my box from one at work, before it *really* was a running Linux box ... but yeah. You get the point.

      Yggdrasil was my first 'real' linux distro, and man was it fancy. You could *boot* a working Linux system from it, from the CD and floppy drive. In 1991. Or, maybe Yggdrasil was '92, I forget... but I'm sure google knows the details.

      I once booted 86 PC's in one afternoon with a single Yggdrasil CD set, at the Title Insurance Company where I was doing work, just so that I could have the pleasure of having 86 Unix boxes, finally, under my control at one time.

      For me, at the time a budding Unix hacker (my first account was on a completely loaded, empty MIPS box, woohoo! First Unix developer workstation was a Magnum pizzabox, woohoo!), this was pure fun. 86 Unix boxes, where once there was only a lowly fleet of DOS machines running ... shudder ... PROGRESS software ...

      Ah, Linux. How good you have been to me. Thanks, Linus!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    31. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does sum up American capitalism quite well though, don't you think?

      And now microsoft uses extortion and theft to make a living. Exports 100,000's of jobs and average computer uses have no choice.

      Longhorn will have a direct 3d install option for it's desktop. The patent wars haven't yet begun and WMD's like TCPA should make companies like M$ accountable for an itchy trigger finger. Unfortunatly, congressional "compromise" means alot of people will likely have expensive book ends.

    32. Re:Home page by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can: a) see if Microsoft Windows CE supports it, and if not either give up and use the CPU they want me to use or pay thousands for them to support my xxx_yyy CPU, or b) port Linux to it myself freely in a couple of days.

      Or c) you could port WinCE to your hardware in about the same amount of time as you would Linux. There would be money involved in becoming a WinCE licencee, of course- but if you're a hardware manufacturer, that amount of money is relatively trivial. MS doesn't hand out the source for CE to everyone (well, it does now with the "shared source" release, but let's pretend here), but if you're going to be shipping CE on your devices, the full source is part of the license deal.

      You can't have really thought that all those machines that run CE are all just some standard hardware platform, same instruction set, same line of CPUs, same bus, same misc hardware, same hardware bootloader, same BIOS or BIOS equivalent... If a manufacturer wants to create a device that runs CE or Linux, it usually involves a bit or porting and adaptation, unless it's standard PC hardware.

      And, FYI, you've got TRON running in your home, somewhere, if you're an average American consumer with credit cards that you use. Every American uses TRON, somehow, at least 2 or 3 times a day.

      I don't doubt that I've used TRON many times without knowing it- likewise, I've used QNX, vxWorks, OS/2, Linux, Windows CE and a bucketload of other OSes without being vaguely aware of it.

      Do I have TRON running on my credit card? If not, how am I using TRON with my CC in my home? I don't have a CC reader or any POS hardware.

      Anyway, my point wasn't "TRON sucks," but more so contending your statement about Linux being able to cleanly replace TRON. Linux could be used for most of what TRON could, provided time and money was spent adapting it to purposes for which TRON already works very well. Along the same lines, if one had the time and money to spend, Windows could be adapted to doing everything that Linux does now.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    33. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's what I meant.

      TRON is ubiquitous in the American consumer goods landscape, as well as the credit card machine industry, etc. ...

      My point was, in response to a troll perhaps but nevertheless, that American's shouldn't get all antsy about their biggest Corporations being called out on abusive industry/market practices against the Japanese tech industry in the 80's. It didn't work! TRON is with you! :)

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    34. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1


      Actually, Microsoft actively *prevented* anyone from doing all of those wonderful things you mention, at the cost of deliberate entropy to the computer science realm. They did *not* bring it to the masses - we could have had these things *EARLIER* if it weren't for Microsoft.

      We *had* Mice, Windows, Icons, and networking, in the 80's, before Microsoft came along. Nothing they have done hasn't been done by companies before them.

      In the case of MSX, which you ought to look into if you consider yourself worthy in discussions of such matters, Microsoft intentionally fragmented the MSX hardware manufactuers options, in order to prevent a single, stable, maintainable platform from emerging ... until they were really ready with DOS.

      How did they do this, you might ask? MSX licensee's needed to license their BASIC interpreters, and take a guess who was the #1 BASIC interpreter provider in that era ...

      Bringing this back to the topic at hand, the MSX initiative was actually involved with TRON. If things had gone as planned, there really *would* have been "Beowulf" clusters of home computing/game machines, accessible over a global network: circa 1986!!

      Well, pity MSX suffered from the Wrath of Billy. In the meantime though, those Japanese hardware manufacturers have been putting TRON in everything. Its a good concept, and it is also good to see things TRON-like happening in the various Linux camps, too ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    35. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is two types of economies within the US right now. One's good example is the big three automakers. The other is what microsoft represents.

    36. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three economies, the bull, the bear, and the dodo

    37. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1

      Or c) you could port WinCE to your hardware in about the same amount of time as you would Linux. There would be money involved in becoming a WinCE licencee, of course- but if you're a hardware manufacturer, that amount of money is relatively trivial.

      This makes no sense, so I'll just shout so you get my point: WRONG!!!!

      Linux vs. CE:

      Money spent porting an operating system I have no control over, versus no money spent porting an operating system I have pretty much total control over, based on what I contribute back to the public good.

      Hmm.

      Zero licensing costs vs. *plenty*, plus You Must Report All Details About Your Hardware Sales To Microsoft.

      Hmm...

      Never mind, anyway. Nobody I know is even *considering* using CE in an embedded device: they are losing that Market, and losing it badly. CE is crap for pretty much everything except writing PC software and floating the Microsoft boat on the Love and Billy Gates Parade.

      You can't have really thought that all those machines that run CE are all just some standard hardware platform, same instruction set, same line of CPUs, same bus, same misc hardware, same hardware bootloader, same BIOS or BIOS equivalent...

      Umm... have a look inside your average eval board vendor catalog, and you'll see more than just a little hardware plagiarism.

      So anyway, has your PC running "MS AgitProp 4.5" blue screened again, yet?

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    38. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1

      Anyway, my point wasn't "TRON sucks," but more so contending your statement about Linux being able to cleanly replace TRON. Linux could be used for most of what TRON could, provided time and money was spent adapting it to purposes for which TRON already works very well. Along the same lines, if one had the time and money to spend, Windows could be adapted to doing everything that Linux does now.

      Linux can do what TRON does, right now, no questions asked, no problems whatsoever. No heavy porting required, no serious re-engineering efforts, no problems.

      Linux can do TRON, today. Many vendors have ported their TRON codebases in matters of hours, and have it all running just fine with a Linux kernel ... or two ... or three ... with networking features, with auto-discovery, with intelligent load-sharing, etc.

      Microsoft CE still can't run in 1 Meg of RAM. Not 'properly', anyway - with networking, etc. That's pretty much all there is to say about the rest of your argument.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    39. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And everything we've wanted to do with Linux, we can now do with some flavor of Windows.

      ( looks over at PPC cluster ) Really?

      When is there going to be 'lie' tag for the moderators?

    40. Re:Home page by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I never said that there weren't advantages or disadvantages to Linux, Windows, TRON, etc. Perhaps my point isn't simple enough for some slashkids to understand without having to think, but none of my statements are about Windows being as good as Linux for some things- or about Linux being as good as or better TRON for others.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    41. Re:Home page by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nobody I know is even *considering* using CE in an embedded device: they are losing that Market, and losing it badly. ...and no one that I know is even considering using Linux for an embedded system, besides PDAs. That statement is 100% true; anyone could make a statement like this. However, it doesn't mean that no one is using Linux for embedded systems, plenty of folks are.

      Umm... have a look inside your average eval board vendor catalog, and you'll see more than just a little hardware plagiarism.

      That is true, but it doesn't negate what I said. Do you really think that for any given CPU, all of the sdk/eval boards are the same, save a couple of options? (ethernet or not, one or two serial ports, one-line LCD or a TFT, etc)

      So anyway, has your PC running "MS AgitProp 4.5" blue screened again, yet?

      I don't own a PC. I don't own any MS software, Windows and MS AgitProp (tm) included. It may come as a shock, but you don't have to be a MS proponent or even a user to attempt to speak the voice of reason. I may use Linux, but there is nothing in the EULA (yet!) that forces me into the position of being a blind cheerleader for Linux upon installation...

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    42. Re:Home page by 1010011010 · · Score: 1


      Microsoft did not "bring computers to the masses," "Enable the tech boom," etc. Take of the Rose-Colored Glasses.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    43. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once booted 86 PC's in one afternoon with a single Yggdrasil CD set, at the Title Insurance Company where I was doing work, just so that I could have the pleasure of having 86 Unix boxes, finally, under my control at one time.

      Sounds like a productive afternoon. I bet you didnt work there for very long.

    44. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they did. Take off your Communist Open Source I-Hate-Everything-Microsoft glasses and think for yourself.

    45. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing they have done hasn't been done by companies before them.

      Yes, except for bringing computers to the masses like the parent poster claimed. You see, the mice, guis, icons, etc that were around before Microsoft were relegated to the stuffy computer labs full of sweaty pencil-necked virgin geeks like you. Microsoft made them affordable and usable for almost everybody.

    46. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me? Extortion and theft? Nobody is forced to buy anything from Microsoft. Most customers and OEMs buy Microsoft because THAT IS WHAT THEY WANT!

    47. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extortion because you can't buy a name brand pc without microsoft getting money (excluding apple), whether or not you ordered linux.

      Theft because microsoft is willing to compete with developers who develop software for windows operating systems. Or they buy the cheap clones and intergrate the software in to their OS.

    48. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...and no one that I know is even considering using Linux for an embedded system, besides PDAs.

      Well, I don't know if you work in the embedded systems industry, but I do, and I know plenty of people who are using Linux, and about 2 companies who have considered CE and decided, on the basis of the licensing and technology issues, that it is crap.

      Do you really think that for any given CPU, all of the sdk/eval boards are the same, save a couple of options? (ethernet or not, one or two serial ports, one-line LCD or a TFT, etc)


      Doesn't matter if they are, or if they are not - the point is its far easier to port Linux to a foreign board architecture than it is to port Windows. For one, the costs are nothing compared to CE, and for two, embedded Linux has so much momentum at this moment, that it really is easy to get Linux running on most new board architectures. All it takes is a little google activity, the hardware ref manuals for your board, and a half decent Internet connection, and you've got the tools you need to get porting!

      ... you don't have to be a MS proponent or even a user to attempt to speak the voice of reason.

      Well, no, you don't have to be a MS proponent or user, but in your case I'm not so sure you should be jumping on the 'listen to me, mine is the voice of reason' soapbox in this thread ... Given that you're unable to see the most obvious benefits of Linux over Windows CE for the embedded hardware developer, I'd say I still question the 'reasoning' behind your actual movites for contributing to this thread.

      The fact is, in 2 minutes flat and for very little cost whatsoever I can be porting the Linux kernel to my new hardware platform. This can not be said about the Windows CE kernel. Nor can it be said of the CE kernel that it is suitable for the needs of TRON.

      For a hardware vendor to not have to deal with *any* licensing issues on the OS line item means a lot. That it can be done with an OS as advanced as Linux is - and in many ways, Linux is a far more advanced operating system than Windows - is just icing on the cake. A cake which is free of manipulative seasoning, alas...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    49. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M$ is famous for make work projects->"Buy from us and you'll pay a hell of a lot more."

      Profits within M$ are 4x the wall street average as per operating costs. Lack of competition?

      The only thing I see is company such as M$ spend more money trying to legislate it's profits, spread bullshit and lies around like confetti relying on a lack of reasonable opposition.

      My first linux system was Redhat. Redhat comes with about 5,000 worth of M$ equivelent software. It installed in 15 minutes. No driver problems or complaints. M$ seems to be written insecure and to keep it's users ignorant.

      M$ made no friends with it's licencing and I believe companies like M$ represent the worst of the american capitalism market.

    50. Re:Home page by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      Yes they did. Take off your Communist Open Source I-Hate-Everything-Microsoft glasses and think for yourself.

      Spoken like a true.... coward. Come out in the open and back up your assertion.

      Microsoft did not "cause the 90s tech boom." Microsoft did not "bring computers to the masses."

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    51. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " but I do "

      Good, reverse engineer for me an lcd in my remote control for my television running a "thin" java client.

      Hint, it has something to do with my coffee pot, my Redhat server, my bath tub, my blinds, my home entertainment center, etc...blah, blah, solid state blah, blah webcam door bell...

    52. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typing a $ instead of an S is not original or funny. On the contrary, it makes you look like another pathetic linux loser who says he hates Microsoft just because thats what his other stinky pear-shaped friends say.

    53. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extortion because you can't buy a name brand pc without microsoft getting money (excluding apple), whether or not you ordered linux.

      http://www.walmart.com/catalog/catalog.gsp?cat=106 562&path=0%3A3944%3A3951%3A41937%3A86796%3A106 562
      http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product_listing.gsp ?cat=86798&path=0%3A3944%3A3951%3A41937%3A86796%3A 86798

      Theft because microsoft is willing to compete with developers who develop software for windows operating systems. Or they buy the cheap clones and intergrate the software in to their OS.

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=theft

    54. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not like it, but neither of those things are extortion or theft. Unless we want to redefine 'extortion' to mean "Anything the AC linux bigot doesn't like".

    55. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or simply communicating like a human.

      Sheesh can't you come up with something a little more reasonable then that.

      Like M$ is what brought the cool graphics and games to "the common user". That M$ has the ability to design an very intuitive gui. Lets try M$ has the best short term (tcpa) possibility to bring my "bank" into my living room and have the ability to price shop/order a pizza of my liking with the toppings I desire.

      Or better yet.

      Something->like there is much bigger barriers that unite linux and companies like M$. That we're still part of a community that is quite small and fairly stong. That 20 M$ could exist without ever stepping on each others toes but that means buying 2 by 4's from a company like intel or ibm.

    56. Re:Home page by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Sorry folks. I misread the post. Credit card machines may be TRON devices, but they're generally not in your home. As for in your home... Perhaps your TV, VCR, DVD, Microwave Oven, Regular Oven, Thermostat, Stereo, Smoke Detector, or remote control is a TRON device. Or maybe your doorbell, carbon monoxide detector, sprinkler controller, clock/radio, toaster, coffee maker, or even your bathroom scale is a TRON device.

    57. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extortion-Gateway, Dell, Compaq,... we both know your full of shit.

      Theft-concidering I paid 12,000 to develop a chunk of software as of yet, unheard of and put out of business 3 years later by the same company I paid the money to, I call that theft.

    58. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I notice that an English version of many of the specifications will be released "in a few months", despite the Japanese version being available since 1998.

      I guess it depends on what "few" means...

    59. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the second time you've said I have a pear shaped head. heh...

      I look like I should be behind a Harly and talk like I should be behind a computer. And I'm quite symmetrical, thank you.

    60. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, your a crappy coder and an even crappier buisnessmen. I guess its only natural to blame everybody else. This is America, right?

    61. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so Gateway, Dell, and Compaq voluntarily agree to contracts with Microsoft because thats what 99+% of their cusomers want- who was 'extorted' here?

      And it sounds like you just suck at business. Nobody stole anything- you just suck. I guess its easier for you to blame Microsoft than to realize that you suck, though.

    62. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      errr,... US conservative fiscal 40's, 50's, 60's. With the unfortunate disposition of being born in canada.

    63. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PC's from dell, gateway, etc. would/should be 150 cheaper if linux were on them->recent articles on a few news sites. I guess it would be money to ms/pc sold within that term.

      I'm glad cars aren't sold the same way. Not being able to price shop hurts everything.

    64. Re:Home page by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft did not "bring computers to the masses," "Enable the tech boom," etc. Take of the Rose-Colored Glasses."

      You're right. It's just a big huge coincidence that the PC boom happened round about the time that Windows 95 came out. It couldn't possibly be that Microsoft had created an OS + GUI that ran on commodity PC hardware. No no, MS put a gun to millions of people's heads and made them buy PCs that happened to have Windows on them.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    65. Re:Home page by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      They had created at least 4 previous "OS + GUI" that ran on commodity hardware before that. I guess they created the 80s tech boom, too.

      Windows 95 also explains the huge uptick in sales of Sun, Cisco, IBM, etc. hardware. Windows 95 also explains the wide availability of the internet.

      Yep.

      All Windows 95. Amazing software.

      Not.

      If it wasn't for the internet, we wouldn't have had the network and telecommunications boom of the 90s. Computers were a sideshow. It *was* a big, huge coincidence that Windows95 arrived at the same time.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    66. Re:Home page by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Windows 95 also explains the huge uptick in sales of Sun, Cisco, IBM, etc. hardware. Windows 95 also explains the wide availability of the internet."

      Yes, and yes.

      "It *was* a big, huge coincidence that Windows95 arrived at the same time."

      Nope. The internet was there. It was a haven for geeks. The popularity of Windows made the internet a household term. The net was around long before Windows. Windows 95 made it popular. Argue with me all you want, the fact remains that Microsoft bet rather heavily on the internet and won.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    67. Re:Home page by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft bet big on the internet AFTER it was already popular. They were playing catch-up.

      There were lots of people running Win3.1, OS/2 and Macintosh computers and using the internet before WIndows 95. Not just "geeks." Businesses. Moms and Dads. Universities.

      Microsoft is not the Messiah, and Windows 95 was not the second coming, Microsoft P.R. not withstanding.

      "Argue with me all you want, the fact remains that Microsoft bet rather heavily on the internet and won."

      Yes, Microsoft more or less obliterated the competition, through a mixture of legal and illegal means. It doesn't mean they started the boom of the 90s. They rode it.

      "Argue with me all you want" -- this is just another way of saying, "Keep talking, I'm not listening," I think.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    68. Re:Home page by jparp · · Score: 1

      and no one that I know is even considering using Linux for an embedded system, besides PDAs.

      Really? Maybe you should check this out...
      http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT7301151332. html

    69. Re:Home page by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Microsoft bet big on the internet AFTER it was already popular. They were playing catch-up."

      Wrong. The internet couldn't possibly have been popular without lots (i.e. millions) of people turning it into something interesting. The Win3.1, OS/2 (why'd you even mention that? heh), and Mac audience playing around on the net was not enough to do that. Sorry.

      "Yes, Microsoft more or less obliterated the competition, through a mixture of legal and illegal means. It doesn't mean they started the boom of the 90s. They rode it."

      Computers evolved from being tools to becoming a source of entertainment. Not only did the internet help with this, but the processors had become poweful enough to do things like play video. CD-ROMS stored enough information to make that viable. The missing piece was an OS to tie it all together, simple enough for anybody to use. Windows 95 was the choice. That's it. There's no arguing it. Yeah, it was unstable and buggy etc, but it still made a computer worth having.

      PCs would have gone *nowhere* without Windows 95. Simple as that. OS2 was a perpetual source of disappointment, and nobody else was up to the task of making an OS+GUI that could compete with Apple.
      MS couldn't possibly have ever attained a monopoly if the market hadn't decided that they were providing what it wanted. MS would have dominated even if they did it 100% legally. (Pity they didn't, really.)

      I'm not what you'd call a pro-MS person. This isn't a "I love MS and you should too" defense. It's a rebuttal from somebody who sat around while it happened, and had to report on it for his programming class at the time.

      MS did not invent the internet. MS did not invent Multimedia. It did, however, make for a computer that didn't scare people. That was vitally important for acceptance of PCs. Acceptance of PCs made for a rather large community to build the internet into what it is today.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    70. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If dell and gateway sold their PC's without an OS for $150 less, then 99% of the people would just go spend $150 on a copy of Windows anyway. Still, there is no extortion, theft, or other misdeed on Microsoft's part just because everybody is willing to pay more for systems so they come with Windows (and the fact that many large, profit-seeking businesses have chosen to only offer Microsoft systems proves that people are willing to pay more for Microsoft- remember, Microsoft was only found guilty of abusing their monopoly with regards to Internet Explorer). If you don't want to pay extra for a PC with Windows, then buy one of the alternatives (such as the PC's offered by WalMart or an Apple).

      And how the hell do you interpret any of this as "not being able to price shop"?

      I'm glad cars aren't sold the same way.

      They are- you can't walk into a Toyota dealership and demand to buy a Corolla with a 5.0 liter V8- they don't offer that (just as Dell doesn't offer a PC without Windows). If you want a car with a V8, you have to shop for a car that does offer it.

    71. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't say pear shaped head, dummy.

    72. Re:Home page by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      And everything we've wanted to do with TRON, we can now do with Linux.

      No we can't. Linux has no support for hard real-time scheduling.

      We have a fighting chance of doing some of those things with RTLinux, but even then we might be in a bit of trouble, because of all the indeterminate-latency device drivers.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    73. Re:Home page by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      If you don't want to pay extra for a PC with Windows, then buy one of the alternatives (such as the PC's offered by WalMart or an Apple).

      But not everyone wants crappy hardware and crappy support.

      They are- you can't walk into a Toyota dealership and demand to buy a Corolla with a 5.0 liter V8- they don't offer that (just as Dell doesn't offer a PC without Windows). If you want a car with a V8, you have to shop for a car that does offer it.

      That's not a valid comparison. Linux was made for PC's. V8's were never made for Corrola's. I think a better comparison is the BBC TV license. If you buy a TV you have to pay the TV license even if you never watch the BBC. Also, similarly, if they believe you own a TV and are not paying the tax they track you down and try to force you to pay it.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    74. Re:Home page by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      Computers evolved from being tools to becoming a source of entertainment. Not only did the internet help with this, but the processors had become poweful enough to do things like play video. CD-ROMS stored enough information to make that viable. The missing piece was an OS to tie it all together, simple enough for anybody to use. Windows 95 was the choice. That's it. There's no arguing it. Yeah, it was unstable and buggy etc, but it still made a computer worth having.

      Not true. Plenty of operating systems could do all that. Other operating systems were more advanced than Windows even. You just didn't know about them because you had no exposure to them because of...guess who...Bill Gates and his monopoly.

      MS couldn't possibly have ever attained a monopoly if the market hadn't decided that they were providing what it wanted. MS would have dominated even if they did it 100% legally. (Pity they didn't, really.)

      That's a pretty big supposition. "Had Microsoft not obliterated it's opponents by illegal means they would still have had a monopoly". Hmm...somehow I don't think so. In fact it is the sole reason they have a monopoly. Besides that Microsoft had already instituted it's MS tax and that meant that virtually all computers that ran on commodity hardware came preinstalled with Windows.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    75. Re:Home page by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Not true. Plenty of operating systems could do all that."

      In the PC arena? Name one? (Not fishing for a rebuttal, but rather genuinely curious.) Amiga comes to mind, too bad it wasn't built from PC parts.

      "Other operating systems were more advanced than Windows even."

      No argument there. The strength of Windows was its ease of use. (not to mention it ran on a variety of hardware.) Pity Apple didn't open up a bit.

      "You just didn't know about them because you had no exposure to them because of...guess who...Bill Gates and his monopoly."

      He didn't have a monopoly back when this all started. That came after Win95 became popular.

      "That's a pretty big supposition."

      I'm not the only one who's made that supposition. Despite popular belief, a lot of things were done right. Not to mention that Apple is pretty much the only player who had any idea how to make a machine usable for the masses.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    76. Re:Home page by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Those thousands of reasons are called "lines of code". The code for Microsoft Windows will never be available - and for this reason alone, we can never do with Windows what we can do with TRON. Or Linux.

      What do you mean? The sourcecode for windows CE is right here.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    77. Re:Home page by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm quite a bit younger than you, a wee one. Back in 1991, I wasn't running Linux- but then again, I didn't have a regular computer. I was lucky enough to have recieved a Tandy/Radio Shack PC-3 handheld computer the year before, along with thermal printer docking station and cassette tape drive. My uncle got it for free, and gave it to me no less. A whop[omg 1.4 K of RAM. As a new programmer, 10 years old, I never seemed to notice havin so little. :)

      I later found out that brand new, these things were very resonably priced- makes you wonder why more nerds didn't have them! The PC-3 - sans docking station/thermal printer or the cassette drive- was only $99. Back in 1983, that was dirt cheap for a fully programmable BASIC computer, with a QWERTY keyboard, some expansion option, and a 20-some character display.

      My first experience with a "real" computer was with a second-hand XT that another uncle gave me in 1992. Dual floppies, ooohhhh yeah. Along with it, he gave me a bunch of disks, including the current version of Minix (on a 6-7 disks labeled /usr /root /usr2, etc) as well as DOS and a bunch of programming languages for it.

      In the end, I stuck with DOS over Minix though. I loved to use Minix- just playing around with it, exploring what binaries were on the disks I had for it. But then again, only MS-DOS had Turbo Prolog- and no matter how much more I studied C, I could do so much more in a few lines of Prolog than I could with C. Heck, I never even did any logic programming, just regular procedural-type stuff, although you had to phrase it in terms of Prolog... :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    78. Re:Home page by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Man, it would do you well to read everything in my post, not just skim for lines that, taken out of context, incite the anger of linux cheerleaders around the world...

      No, really- go ahead, read the post.

      Ok, still didn't get it? Here's a juicy tidbit from my post: "...and no one that I know is even considering using Linux for an embedded system, besides PDAs. That statement is 100% true; anyone could make a statement like this. However, it doesn't mean that no one is using Linux for embedded systems, plenty of folks are."

      Does it make sense yet?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    79. Re:Home page by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Ok, I think I've figured it out- all of your antagonism stems from an initial misunderstanding of what I said at first, and have been misinterpreting my every word after that.

      Given that you're unable to see the most obvious benefits of Linux over Windows CE for the embedded hardware developer, I'd say I still question the 'reasoning' behind your actual movites for contributing to this thread.

      I understand the benefit sof Linux over Windows CE in plenty of situations. Re-read my posts if you must. You seem to have skipped the parts where I say good things about embedded Linux. Linux is great. Linux is swell. I LOVE LINUX! I run Linux in a number of places. However, that doesn't change the fact that what you can do with Linux, you can do with CE.

      Anywho, here is some food for thought- I saw it over on NewMobileComputing. Although, since it is an article stating that total cost of development for WinCE on embedded systems can be cheaper than the same Linux solution, I imagine it is just a lie concocted by the Evil Horned One, Billy G himself, right?

      Not saying I trust the study, but interesting none the less... But EVIL! Don't bother reading that link- Linux is your best option anywhere!

      Man, it'd sure be nice to get a chunk of that really small Linux out in the field. On my Zaurus, Linux+Qtopia takes up a whopping 18 MB of RAM on boot (WinCE takes up 2-3 MB). It'd be nice if Linux wasn't so memory hungry on that particular embedded system. :)

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    80. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1

      No we can't. Linux has no support for hard real-time scheduling.

      Seen TimeSys Linux yet?

      http://www.timesys.com/

      There are many ways that Linux can have support for hard real-time scheduling, and some of those ways require the use of one tool: 'patch'.

      As for the indeterminate-latency device drivers, all I can say is that that is a problem *outside* the Linux kernel, and can be dealt with by writing good drivers for the target hardware in the first place: something an embedded hardware manufacturer is going to be doing anyway.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    81. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1

      Can I take this source code, make a change to any of the fundamental protocols/API's to support features I - or my industry - may require, and release that code again, freely, to other members of my industry, so as to establish new standards of interoperability?

      No. I cannot. Microsoft will come down on me like a ton of bricks if I even think about it, as a hardware vendor.

      Thus, it is not the same as using the Linux kernel to establish a TRON-like industry.

      *Sharing* of protocol and API implementations without limit is key to the ethos of TRON: not sharing these protocols and API implementations is key to the Microsoft ethos of monopoly.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    82. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1

      However, that doesn't change the fact that what you can do with Linux, you can do with CE.

      Okay, I think that my antagonism is based on this point. You *CAN'T* do with CE what you can do with Linux, and especially not in the context of TRON!

      TRON, as an effort, required hardware vendors to open all specifications and protocols for communication and command to each other. It requires that hardware vendors compete on *hardware* but share software resources in order to ensure direct compatability at all levels of communication and command.

      This is the antithesis to what Microsoft will let you do with CE: as a hardware vendor, if I come up with a new protocol for command or communications which makes sense in the realms of my hardware environment, then I cannot simply write that code, add it to the public CE codebase, and expect others in my industry to be able to have free and clear access to it. Microsoft will block any attempts made by hardware vendors to produce standardized, industry-wide, protocols or API's Which They Do Not Control.

      TRON is the anti-thesis to Microsofts' mission. TRON puts the power of the computing industry in the hands of computer hardware vendors, and in some ways trivializes software as a means of industrial control. Since MS are a software company, and make no direct profits from hardware sales, this is why they have never gotten behind the TRON effort.

      I hope that explains my view, and I apologize for last nights' antagonism - it really did seem like you were just trying to shoehorn CE into place in the discussion, when it clearly does not fit, at all, for the purposes of the industry who might be interested in building a TRON system...

      TRON is not just a technology, it is a means by which competing hardware manufacturers can work together while still being able to innovate on the things that matter: hardware design and integration.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    83. Re:Home page by OhReally · · Score: 1

      Along the same lines, if one had the time and money to spend, Windows could be adapted to doing everything that Linux does now.

      I'd say MS has the time and money. What's stopping them?

    84. Re:Home page by lifebouy · · Score: 1

      Along the same lines, if one had the time and money to spend, Windows could be adapted to doing everything that Linux does now.

      And for those of us who dont have oodles of cash and a fortune 500 company(read: most of us), and for those who do but have better things to spend money on(read: practically everyone else on this planet), thankfully there are many free options which are getting better all the time: Linux, TRON, *BSD, etc.
      Sure, Windows could be adapted to many environments if you had just sh*tloads of money to throw at it, but every dollar thrown at a problem decreases the value of its solution.

      --
      Drop me a line at:
      Key ID: 0x54D1D809
    85. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    86. Re:Home page by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      There are many ways that Linux can have support for hard real-time scheduling, and some of those ways require the use of one tool: 'patch'.

      Unless there's something in Linux that you really need, I suspect that TRON is often going to be easier and cheaper to use than patch. The "patch" approach effectively requires you to maintain your own Linux kernel tree. That has a cost associated with it. If you can get all that you need off-the-shelf from somewhere else, that will probably be better for you in the long run.

      Note that I'm not knocking Linux here. I'm a very happy long-time Linux user. However, it's not the most appropriate solution to every problem, especially when there are many other fine open source operating systems out there, several of them designed from the ground-up for real-time embedded systems, of which TRON is but one.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    87. Re:Home page by torpor · · Score: 1

      Ummm... I see absolutely nothing wrong with maintaining my own Linux kernel tree.

      In the hardware world, you don't *need* to have the latest tree from Linus and co. to get actual real-life work done.

      There is no 'maintenance' once the patch for Realtime - and there are plenty of options out there for Linux now - has been done. If the kernel passes muster, it passes muster, and off it goes in its own little boxen.

      So far, I've had very little difficulty finding areas where Linux is perfect for the job - the more I look, the easier it gets to find ways to use Linux in the hardware world. The beauty of it is, even if there are problems (RAM requirements, CPU requirements, etc) I can definitely bend Linux to fit.

      As for the 'off-the-shelf' thing, I'm afraid you've lost me. There is nothing better, in terms of 'off-the-shelf', than Linux. Unless you mean 'Sales Shelf', but I've only got r&d shelves in my space these days ... and no need for a budget when it comes to kernels/operating environments.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    88. Re:Home page by Pseudonym · · Score: 1
      Ummm... I see absolutely nothing wrong with maintaining my own Linux kernel tree.

      Nor do I, but then, I'm generally not the one who counts the beans. If you had to decide whose budget it comes out of, that's a different issue.

      So far, I've had very little difficulty finding areas where Linux is perfect for the job [...]

      I can name quite a few areas myself. I can also name quite a few where it isn't perfect, but some other solution is. Often, the better solution is also open source.

      If the kernel passes muster, it passes muster, and off it goes in its own little boxen.

      ...until a bug is found, which gets fixed in Linus' and Alan's trees, which you then have to reconcile with your own tree along with everything else that has gone into the kernel in the mean time, or wait for someone else to do it.

      There is nothing better, in terms of 'off-the-shelf', than Linux. Unless you mean 'Sales Shelf' [...]

      No, by "off the shelf" I mean precisely that combination of qualities which do not oblige you to apply source patches or otherwise maintain your own tree.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    89. Re:Home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And everything we've wanted to do with Linux, we can now do with some flavor of Windows. There is no reason that what people do with Linux can't be done on Windows CE or desktop Windoze.

      Could you please explain to me how I can build a traffic shaping router + firewall for under $50 (including the hardware) with Windows?

      TIA

  5. bad economics.... bad forbes! by Transient0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the Article:
    Had Sakamura decided to charge even one cent to each user of TRON, he would easily be a dollar billionaire by now, possibly even rivalling Gates, reputed to be the world's richest man with a fortune estimated at $43 billion by Forbes magazine.


    This is a pretty unfounded claim. The truth is that this is a relatively simple system we are talking baout here. If Sakamura had been charging for TRON it seems relatively likely that either hundreds of competitors would have sprung up to grab a slice of the pie or that someone else would simply have released a similar open source product. In either case, although Sakamura would probably have made some money, assuming $43 billion is just silly.
    1. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, yeah it does just seem like a opportunity for CNN to remind us how much money Gates has. What great reportage, does CNN/AOLTW own Forbes magazine?

    2. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by jkrise · · Score: 1

      In either case, although Sakamura would probably have made some money, assuming $43 billion is just silly.

      You're forgetting Service Packs, Anti-viruses, Firewalls, CD Burners, Stop-Spam-Solutions, Protocol-Licensing, Patent royalties etc. etc.

      -

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    3. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      At a penny a user, he'd only have to sell 4.3 trillion licenses, what's so odd about that? And of course, he'd get it all tax-free, so he could just stuff it under his matress and amass this collossal fortune...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    4. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by jandrese · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, he'd have to have a really big matress to fit 4.3 trillion pennies under it. I hope he doesn't live on the top floor of some apartment building.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by ocie · · Score: 1

      They must have borrowed an accountant from the RIAA to come up with that number.

      --
      JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    6. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by cybercuzco · · Score: 1
      it seems relatively likely that either hundreds of competitors would have sprung up to grab a slice of the pie or that someone else would simply have released a similar open source product.

      Not if he had gotten a patent on "Method for operating a series of transistors, resistors, and capacitors so as to provide a useful function"

      --

    7. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by Binestar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, he'd have to have a really big matress to fit 4.3 trillion pennies under it. I hope he doesn't live on the top floor of some apartment building.

      That's not an apartment building, it's his stack of pennies.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    8. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2, Funny
      Wow, he'd have to have a really big matress to fit 4.3 trillion pennies under it. I hope he doesn't live on the top floor of some apartment building.

      That's a futon, you insensitive clod!

      --
      The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
    9. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wouldn't be rich at all. You know how much they charge for cashing a one cent check ? More than one cent ! The bank would have been rich but not our Japanese professor.

    10. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that the article states that TRON is currently deployed on 3 billion devices. One cent = 1/100 dollar. 1dollar/100 * 3 billion = 30 million. $30million < $1billion. Someone's math is wrong. Even if there were 3 billion new installs a year for 10 years the guy would not be a billionaire by charging one cent for each install..

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    11. Re:bad economics.... bad forbes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an apartment building, it's his stack of pennies.

      They're called 'yen' you insensitive clod!

  6. What If != Reality by webword · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Had Sakamura decided to charge even one cent to each user of TRON, he would easily be a dollar billionaire by now, possibly even rivalling Gates, reputed to be the world's richest man with a fortune estimated at $43 billion by Forbes magazine."

    This assumes that he could charge one penny, or one dollar, or 100 yen, or whatever. This kind of speculation is vacuous. It is like saying, If I had a nickel for every time I read /. I'd be rich! No one can say what would have happened in terms of adoption if there was a financial barrier.

    1. Re:What If != Reality by laird · · Score: 1

      Of course. It was a metaphore intended to dramatize the extremely large number of devices that use TRON, not as a literal financial projection.

  7. Movie by GeckoFood · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the movie TRON, TRON was a program designed to crack security and free the computer from an overpowering OS that became self-aware and was plotting to take over everything. In the end TRON was victorious.

    It's not hard to draw obvious parallels...

    Hearing that M$ went out of the way to block TRON from being used on this side of the pond brought back found memories of said movie. Give that program one of those cool disks from the movie and see what happens...

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
    1. Re:Movie by Murdoc · · Score: 1
      Hearing that M$ went out of the way to block TRON from being used on this side of the pond brought back found memories of said movie. Give that program one of those cool disks from the movie and see what happens...

      If only M$ had that lovely Single Point of Failure that the MCP seemed to have at the base of the cone, then that might work. If only the Users could help us!

      --
      Our ignorance is not so vast as our failure to use what we know. - M. King Hubbert
  8. Dollar Billionaire? by hether · · Score: 1

    Had Sakamura decided to charge even one cent to each user of TRON, he would easily be a dollar billionaire by now

    What's a dollar billionaire? The term just struck me as odd. Does it just refer to the fact that they mean the billions would be in dollars instead of yen?

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    1. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Keyser_Lives · · Score: 2

      Yes. It's a way of measuring wealth relatively, so if you claim to be a billionaire with 100 billion foodollars in the bank, if there are are 100 million foodollars to 1 USD, then you would have $1000, whereas a dollar billionaire has, well, a billion USD, so you can compare who is richer in real terms.

    2. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most probably - since the story is about Japanese this may be important to specify, as billions of yen is really not that much (1bil yen = 8.5mil USD, according to the story).

    3. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    4. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      What's a dollar billionaire? The term just struck me as odd. Does it just refer to the fact that they mean the billions would be in dollars instead of yen?

      Most likely, yes. Much of the article sounds like it was translated (somewhat poorly) from, perhaps, Japanese.

      JPY 1e9 is approximately USD 8.5e6, which would seem to indicate that this clarification is necessary.

    5. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can be a paper billionaire in the sense that you own a lot of property etc. However, you don't actually have a billion dollars in the bank. A dollar billionaire on the other hand DOES have a billion or more in CASH! For exaple, I can add up the value of my home, my cars, computers etc, and one could say that the value of all that plus the cash I have is what I am worth on paper. However, I don't actually have that cash at my disposal.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    6. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not all billionaires are made equal.

      An Romanian billionaire can barely afford a PC, let alone a nice house and a fancy car.

    7. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would make sense if you understood Engrish.

    8. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Salo2112 · · Score: 1

      You would be worth that much in cash, not stocks you would have to liquify.

    9. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Not only is a dollar worth much more than a yen, so a dollar billionaire would be much richer than a yen billionaire, but a billion is not the same in different parts of the world.
      In the US, a billion is a thousand million, while in most of the rest of the world, a billion is a million million.

      So, if you are in the US, it's better to be a dollar millionaire, but if you are somewhere where a billion is a thousand times larger, it would be better to be a yen billionaire :-)

      Regards,
      --
      *Art

    10. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      "billions of yen is really not that much (1bil yen = 8.5mil USD"

      Yeah that's not worth my time or effort. 8.5 mil just doesn't cut it.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    11. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, I had to do a double-take there.

      Last I checked, 1 billion is 1e9, right? So a billion is a billion everywhere, and a billion will always be 1000 times more than a million.

      Now, a $1,000,000,000 is not the same a 1 billion yen, which I think is the point you are trying to make.

      Regards, sir.
      -Chris

    12. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a billion is not always a billion:

      sci english dutch

      1e6 million miljoen
      1e9 billion miljard
      1e12 milliard (?) biljoen

      So in dutch, a billion is 1,000,000 times more than a million.

    13. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

      No, in the US a billion is 1,000,000,000 while in many other parts of the world a billion is 100,000,000.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    14. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in Denmark, a billion is actually called a milliard.

      goes like this:
      million
      milliard
      billion

    15. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1e12 milliard (?) biljoen

      1e12 is a "trillion" in the US. 1e3- thousand, 1e6- million, 1e9- billion, 1e12- trillion, 1e15- quadrillion, etc....

    16. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by 2short · · Score: 1

      No. A "dollar billionaire", in the sense they are using it, has a net worth over a billion US dollars. They are distinguishing it from a "Yen Billionaire", who would be rich, but not mega-rich.

      By your definition, where an individual would need to have a billion dollars in actual CASH, there probably aren't any. This is because keeping that much money in CASH would be financialy idiotic in the extreme; a trait that is not found in many billionaires.

    17. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Last I checked, 1 billion is 1e9, right? So a billion is a billion everywhere, and a billion will always be 1000 times more than a million"

      In short: Nope. The last time you checked was in the US. In most of the rest of the english-speaking world 1 billion is 1e12; 1e9 is a "thousand million". If it's any consolation, I too am utterly amazed by this.

    18. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      1e9 is a "thousand million"

      Also called milliard

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    19. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Really? Care to provide an example to a simple minded unedumacated half-wit like myself?

      -Chris
      [truly, I'm being serious... :-) ]

    20. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      In fact, it goed even further, as being a YEN billionair is much easier than a dollar or euro one.

      Think about it this way:
      The Euro is worth 200 Lira (Italy's currency back before the Euro). So, before the euro, it was relatively simple to be a Lira billionair as it wasn't worht very much.

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    21. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Check here. The only reason I know this is because I've seen it discussed on Slashdot before. And I might have gotten it mixed around as well. Anyway U.S. billion is not always the same as a billion in other parts of the world. Silly, right?

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    22. Re:Dollar Billionaire? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever has billions at their disposal.
      Not even governments. You might be able
      to get/give/spend/hold a hundred million or
      so, tops, but not multiple billions.
      It's not paper anymore, it's bits. When you
      have a billion in the bank (nobody does),
      you don't have a billion on paper, you have
      an entry on a hard drive reading
      0x0017 0x4876 0xe800.

      Now it might be feasible to convert this to
      some high-value commodity, such as crocus
      stamens, or van goghs, but i don't think
      that really qualifies as an ability to spend,
      since what you get is no less artificially
      valued than that pattern of bits.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  9. Lame is your state of mind. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all ready modded overrated.

    Take notice, this is what happens when karma whores try to first post.

    Next time, leave comedy to the professionals who post at 0 and -1. Or better yet, fire up your l33t Linux rig and toss it into the tub next time you're taking a bath.

  10. School computer TRON usage by CineK · · Score: 1

    I wonder, if TRON was embedded system - how could they use it for school computers,
    or maybe we should compare it to QNX ?

    --
    -- echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb31350717901017685 42287578439snlbxq'|dc
    1. Re:School computer TRON usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TRON is now mainly used as an embeded system, but it can also be used to run a normal desktop computer. the developer does so.
      you can also run linux on embeded systems, as well as PCs. however, with TRON the focus of the development was embeded stuff, and with linux it was PCs

    2. Re:School computer TRON usage by skonno · · Score: 1

      Tron supports desktop computers, and the version is called as B-Tron. Please check the computer which is released in Japan.

  11. perhaps you forgot about the BSDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't like there are no alternatives to linux.

  12. TRON? by KillerHamster · · Score: 1, Funny

    So, where's the TROFF operating system?

  13. 1989? Microsoft?? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Story is out of whack. In 1989 Microsoft Windows barely worked and the machines of the day barely had the processing power.

    It is more likely that the trade barrier being described would be for sale of hardware rather than for software. I can't see the US Govt getting up in a lather about the MSDOS license fee.

    The other issue the story ignores is that there would not be as many copies of the O/S if there was a charge of a cent a copy.

    The most widely used O/S is embedded on some smartcard or other...

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      The hw running it surely kept on selling, tv's and such, it's pretty clear that it's mostly used on embedded systems. The arm-twisting was to prevent it coming mainstream on pc's(through adaptation in education system).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by fruey · · Score: 1
      The most widely used O/S is embedded on some smartcard or other..

      Err... smartcards just store data, they don't have an embedded OS on them.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "In 1989 Microsoft Windows barely worked and the machines of the day barely had the processing power"

      Don't u mean "In 2003...."?

    4. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Duuuude- maybe that's what he means! What is on our memory cards is what runs them, you know like an OS... PORN: THE GLOBAL OPERATING SYSTEM!

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    5. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't see the US Govt getting up in a lather about the MSDOS license fee.

      You seem pretty naieve in the ways of US protectionism - the US has a nasty history of screwing with businesses in other countries, even when it violates their own treaties..

      The Canadian softwood lumber dispute is but one (recent) example.. a US business goes whining to the government that they can't compete on even terms, so the government steps in to "help" them - even when it's illegal... (In this example, the WTO court ruled that the tarriff was illegal, but the US hasn't budged... they're stalling for the ruling from the NAFTA panel, which will say the same thing the WTO did.)

    6. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by mikiN · · Score: 1
      Err... smartcards just store data, they don't have an embedded OS on them.

      Wrong. The operating system (and of course the processor to run it on) is precisely what makes them different from memory cards.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    7. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, don't you know why they are called _smart_cards ?

    8. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by mpthompson · · Score: 1

      Like Zeinfeld, I find the anti-American spin of the article more than a bit suspect. In particular, the statements about Super 301 trade laws blocking the introduction of TRON into Japanese school computers. This just doesn't make any sense?

      If such a switch were made to TRON, what would prevent US companies from licensing TRON to compete in the school Japanese market. Nothing - particularly since the OS is open source. In 1989 the Japanese government could have chosen at least half a dozen non-Microsoft operating systems for their school computers and the US government couldn't say boo about it. What makes TRON any different than if the Japanese had chosen to use the Amiga OS or even a variant of Unix?

      The article then goes on to state that Japanese government and several computer firms severed ties to TRON because it might anger the American government and companies. However, the evidence is overwhelmingly against this statement as these same companies continued to use TRON making it the most ubiquitous operating system in the world. I don't see how this constitutes severed relationships.

      To believe the basic premise of this article you have to suspend disbelief on too many levels. It may make for a nice story on the imagined evils of American capitalism trouncing the poor Japanese programmer, but I suspect the truth as to the failure of TRON as a desktop operating system is far different and more complicated.

    9. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Err... smartcards just store data, they don't have an embedded OS on them.

      Really? The creators of:

      might disagree.

      I've actually used all but two of the above. There are many more, but I got tired of googling for links.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by detect · · Score: 1
      No, you just need to know more about the facts of the matter:



      from: Tron: twenty years on


      BTRON ran into trouble, though--political trouble. In April 1989, the fledgling OS specifications became embroiled in a trade dispute between Japan and the United States when the United States Trade Representative got wind of the Japanese government's plans to use BTRON as the OS for computers to be used in Japanese classrooms. The USTR said BTRON's use would constitute "actual and potential market intervention" and placed BTRON on the list of products to be sanctioned under the Super 301 article of the U.S. Omnibus Trade Act.


      How a freely available, freely traded computer operating system could be conceived of as a trade barrier was never clear. Any company in any country can freely create its own TRON OS without even bothering with the channels of international trade. It didn't take long for the USTR to recognize its mistake. BTRON was immediately removed from Super 301 sanctions and the USTR retracted its initial criticism of the Japanese government's proposed use of the OS for classroom computers.


      But the damage had already been done. Sakamura believes it was fear of political fallout that caused nearly all Japanese companies to drop the BTRON project like a hot potato, while the government decided not to designate any specific OS for in-school computers.



      another interesting article:
      How the USTR Saved the BTRON Subproject

      --
      // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
    11. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      In 1989, we didn't have the same expectations of speed out of a PC as we do now.

      I used to produce (ca. 1988) the (illustrated) price lists for my employer at the time - data transferred from a Wang onto a Compaq 'portable', imported into 1-2-3, manipulated a bit, and then transferred into Ventura, which produced the pages to send to the printers.

      And things took time. Lots of time. Go away and make a cup of tea time.

      But we didn't expect any more, so it was OK.

      Even in 1990, the acquisition of a PS/2 with a whole 2MB RAM was a godsend, as StatGraphics only took 5 minutes to crunch a typical dataset rather than the previous 20.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    12. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Informative
      It is more likely that the trade barrier being described would be for sale of hardware rather than for software.

      No ... amazingly enough, the system they complained about was based on an Intel processor. This must be seen in the context of the political and economic climate of the time. The US was having its head handed to it in most consumer electronics areas. They were terrified that, if the desktop market in Japan was based on a (superior) architecture developed in Japan, they would lose the entire market. To say nothing of what might have happened in the rest of the world ...

      The action against TRON by the US (government and industry) in 1980 was an injustice. At the time, though, the US was in what it viewed as an economic fight for survival and "alls fair in love and war".

    13. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by fruey · · Score: 1
      Yep, my mistake. D'oh.

      Nice link list, that's what you call ramming the point home, isn't it... especially when someone already rubbed my nose in it ;-)

      Cheers.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    14. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by swillden · · Score: 1

      Nice link list, that's what you call ramming the point home

      Absolutely! Never settle for just making a point when you can jam it clear up to the eyeballs ;-)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    15. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by mpthompson · · Score: 1

      Thanks for providing additional information, but I still don't buy it. It just doesn't make sense that some USTR bureaucrat making a dumb mistake (particularly one that was so obvious and quickly rectified) could squash all efforts at developing a desktop version of TRON for the Japanese education market.

      If this is indeed the true reason for TRON not succeeding as a desktop OS, it is a severe indictment of the Japanese being spineless in trade negotiations and having no confidence in homegrown software technology, rather than a valid criticism of American bullying. This flies in the face of the history of Japanese being very aggressive when it comes to trade negotiations. Particularly in the '80s when Japan seemed invincible as an technologic and economic power.

      The second link you provided is indeed interesting. It may contain more of the truth regarding the failure of TRON as a desktop OS where it discusses the internal cultural barriers and prejudices TRON faced in Japan.

      In any case, thanks for providing the information.

    16. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Err... smartcards just store data, they don't have an embedded OS on them.

      Smartcards with embedded processors have been available for years. Sun does very nicely selling its JavaCard technology. Before that there were plenty of cards with a standard cell 6502 onboard.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    17. Re:1989? Microsoft?? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Like Zeinfeld, I find the anti-American spin of the article more than a bit suspect. In particular, the statements about Super 301 trade laws blocking the introduction of TRON into Japanese school computers. This just doesn't make any sense?

      Well you do have to remember the time. Not a lot made sense. The statement does not make sense to me because it is very clear that that is not the sort of threat the Japanese would have given in to at the time. The only reason they would have given in is if the TRON O/S was in fact being pushed as a part of a restraint of trade scheme and they got caught. For example a contract to fill japanese schools with some homebrew hardware concoction powered by TRON to keep IBM PCs out of the bidding.

      The reason I discount Microsoft as being the nexus here is the politics of the time. Microsoft did not give the campaign contributions necessary to get that type of muscle, and the cost of the lost MSDOS licenses would have been small change. It is much more likely that a hardware manufacturer was upset.

      At the time Japan bashing was a national political sport. The media printed a constant stream of smug articles about how the Japanese economy was going to kick, no sorry was kicking US butt. The US resorted with regular complaints about Japanese 'protectionism' while playing many of the same games themselves.

      The nadir was when President George Bush mkI threw up on the Prime Minister of Japan at a state banquet.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  14. Re:Get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually TRON stands for TRace ON, it's counter part being TROFF, TRace OFF.

  15. More information... by Noryungi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here, and here.

    (All links courtesy of google).

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
  16. -1, redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PLEASE no more stupid jokes about the movie

    1. Re:-1, redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you Alan1?

    2. Re:-1, redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      End of line.

  17. PR0N by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Funny
    When it was first revealed in 1984, TRON, which can be modified for use on personal computers, was hailed in Japan as a homemade software which could break the dominance of Microsoft and free Japanese computer firms from the burden of paying for the basic software.

    First revealed in 1984, PR0N, which can be modified for use on personal computers, was hailed in Japan as a homemade software which could break the dominance of Playboy and Hustler and free Japanese masturbators from the burden of paying for the basic software.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:PR0N by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      I've been running PR0N ever since I was twelve and it hasn't BSOD'ed once!

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    2. Re:PR0N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you have! Clean that up!

    3. Re:PR0N by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/software/hardware/ to get the full visual.

  18. The Best Thing About Tron... by pazu13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that instead of just deleting old programs, you can throw frisbees at them and they'll disappear. For once, you'll be able to have as much fun deleting files as Strong Bad[homestarrunner.com].

    --
    It wasn't me, it was the one-armed .sig!
  19. Windows CE, oddly enough by opti6600 · · Score: 0

    Sadly enough, actually Windows CE has found itself into the workings of certain onboard computers in home appliances. Scary, isn't it?

    1. Re:Windows CE, oddly enough by cyclist1200 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course it's scary. Why do you think it's abbreviated as WinCE?

    2. Re:Windows CE, oddly enough by cshark · · Score: 1

      What I fail to understand is how not charging for something is unfair competition. Maybe this explains the goverment's views on Linux. Spooky...

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

  20. Tron by pheared · · Score: 1

    Homer: Uh...it's like...did anyone see the movie "Tron"?

    1. Re:Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uh...it's like...did anyone see the movie "Tron"

      No... No... No.... No... No.... No... Yes - er I mean No...
  21. Re:just buy it! by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

    Dude, the music at the tron2 site is melting my brain... the flash anims have locked up my browser and all I can hear is that errie ethereal chorous background music..

    This is so much worse than a goats.ex link.

    MAKE IT STOP!

  22. more like Losing Nemo by yerricde · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes we may be a heartless, monopolistic company

    Tell me about it.

    but we're not that other heartless monopolistic company who doesn't like open source.

    Microsoft uses open-source software in its Services For UNIX product. Many of its userland network programs (ping, ftp, etc) are based on those from BSD. But then again, Microsoft put a provision into the license for its C library banning linking with copylefted code, even where the copylefted code's license would otherwise allow it (e.g. "operating system" exception in the GNU GPL), so I guess you're right.

    We at Disney love open source.

    Then why hasn't Disney released Mickey Mouse as open source? Nine out of ten copyright scholars agree that it's time for the company to move on to a new cash cow.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  23. Been waiting for a long time for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, this is the first /. story in a looong time that is totally new and fresh to me and interesting.

    This is they type of story that i began reading /. because of.

    For all the shit i normally give the ed.s, i gotta give you guys props this time. Thanks for bringin back the old /. even for just a bit.

    1. Re:Been waiting for a long time for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and in true Slashdot style none of the post seem to be anything more than trolls and "wasn't Tron a movie" crap.

  24. Obvious question... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Where's the light-cycle racing program?

    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
  25. TRON on a PC by FU_Fish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to see this guy's TRON pc. I wonder what software he's able to run on it.

    1. Re:TRON on a PC by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he's running both TRON and tron.

    2. Re:TRON on a PC by ranmachan · · Score: 1

      Probably B-right/V R2.5, see
      http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/b-right-vr2-5 galle ry.html

      --
      Tobias
  26. God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by NoData · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fromt the article:

    "It's not good to charge people for using something which is like a social infrastructure. It also inhibits the development of the computer industry. The very basic infrastructure should be free," he said.

    "But Mr Gates is free to do whatever he wants, as we live in a world of capitalism."


    A man who's got it right.
    Why can't we (in the western world) get this type of soft-spoken wisdom to be the face of OSS, and not the curmudgeonly off-putting geekazoidness of RMS?

    1. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by kahei · · Score: 1


      Because the Western open source community is heavily based in Unix culture.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    2. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because he doesn't want to be the face of anything. If you tried to make him that then you'd make his life miserable -- he appears to be happy with where he is and what he does. Pushing fame onto him would upset that.

      RMS is what we get because he wants the job. I don't particularly care for a lot of his statements, but he's a zealot because he wants to be one.

      Frankly, Linus sounds a lot more like Mr Sakamura than anything else... he is outspoken, but he also doesn't give a damn about the politics or other crap. He just wants to get his job done. Which is why you have disagreements over things like BitKeeper. RMS has a gold standard to uphold, Linus has a job to get done. Linus has become something of a poster boy, but by his own statement he doesn't want to be one. Some of his actions would indicate otherwise, but that doesn't surprise me. Being recognized for what you do is usually an endorphin rush. Time will tell whether or not Linus wants the spotlight.

      I whole heartedly agree with you on Mr. Sakamura though. His statements about infrastructure are dead on, as is his statement regarding Mr. Gates.

    3. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting


      I've been following Mr. Sakamura for years, and I agree: his is the soft-spoken, intelligent view which is missing from the OSS PR front. I wouldn't say its missing from OSS at all - in fact, clearly not - but the PR front in Linux-land is definitely dominated by arrogant pricks.

      I'm one of them. I've been a Linux user since Linux announced it on minix, and I've put Linux to use in countless businesses and organizations I have consulted for, through the 90's and still yet into the 21st Century.

      I've used a similar argument to Mr. Sakamura's - that Microsoft is free to do what they want, even if it is socially destructive - and it works.

      So, the answer to your question of "why can't we..." is "we are". And should.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    4. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I think you misinterpret slightly. He made many other comments disparaging of BillG, such as

      "The reason why it was not used for personal computers was not a technical one, it was a political one."

      Also

      But the dream was shattered in 1989 when the United States threatened to designate TRON as an unfair trade barrier under its Super 301 trade law when it learned of plans by the Japanese government to use the software for computers in schools.

      ...

      Sakamura said he was puzzled by the initial U.S. move and disappointed at the reaction of Japanese firms.

      So, as an engineer he was disappointed and puzzled as to why his technically better, and free, OS was treated with so much hostility by the Americans. From MS, up to the US government risking a trade dispute in order to block it. And the Japanese firms went where the money was and followed MS.

      Perhaps his comment on Gates is instead a gentle dig at the American religion of capitalism?

    5. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      If that's what you desire in an open source leader, I think you're looking for Linus.

    6. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by cybercuzco · · Score: 1
      Why can't we (in the western world) get this type of soft-spoken wisdom to be the face of OSS, and not the curmudgeonly off-putting geekazoidness of RMS?

      Because any system of tolerance is susceptable to groups or individuals that are intolerant. For example: Roman Religion (zeus etc) was tolerant of alternative religions. Along came christianity, which specifically said "all other religions are bogus, and everyone must convert" Roman religion was tolerant of christianity, but christianity was not tolerant of it. End result, everyone is christian. Of course once everyone is locked into one system of belief, there is no room for dissent, which is in itself a destabilizing force, and will eventually lead to schisims and multiple belief systems. Computer OS's are a good example of this. MS is dominant, there was no viable alternative, people came up with the only alternative that was possible, Open Source.

      --

    7. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by mdblake · · Score: 1

      Dood, Why don't you step up and be that ideal representative you dream of. Until you do you are doomed to put up with the idiosyncracies of the people who do commit their time and energy. If you achieve anything even remotely similar to setting the foundation for Free and Open Source software as we know it, then we'll be happy to acknowledge your effort. But if all you're going to do is rehash cheap talk about people who otherwise have done a great deal of good then, uh, I think you're late for your board meeting.

    8. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by riley · · Score: 1

      "Mr Stallman is free to say whatever he wants, as we live in a country of First Amendment protections."

    9. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why can't we (in the western world) get this type of soft-spoken wisdom to be the face of OSS, and not the curmudgeonly off-putting geekazoidness of RMS?


      Some people just can't resist having a dig at RMS can they. What is this? Some underground movement to personally insult him at every oppurtunity.

      I wouldn't mind though if the insult was accurate. FYI, RMS isn't the face of OSS. In fact, he has nothing to do with OSS. You're probably confusing OSS with the FSF. I'm constantly amazed how people can such a simple fact like this, wrong.
    10. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if Mr. Sakamura grew up with the social pressure we love to inflict on our engineers in the US he would be just as an off-putting geekazoid.

      Remember your environment makes up about 30% of your psyche. I'd cut anyone some slack if they have to deal with the social and political environment that exists here in the US.

    11. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by lightcycle · · Score: 1

      PEDANTIC: Zeus was a greek god. It's Roman counterpart was Jupiter

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
    12. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by devnull17 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps his comment on Gates is instead a gentle dig at the American religion of capitalism?

      That'd be rather hypocritical, as the Japanese are every bit as capitalist as we are, if not more so.

    13. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by PurpleBob · · Score: 1

      Wow. I had no idea that feeding someone to lions was a way of showing tolerance.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
    14. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by Lathi- · · Score: 1

      For the record, Christianity was not treated well by the Romans. Emporer Nero used to use Christians as human torches at his lawn parties. Killing Christians (men, women, and children) in the arena was common sport. They were crucified, beheded, used as slave labor, and generally discriminated against at every opportunity. In short, there was no incentive to become a Christian in the first and second centry other than believing the message of Christianity.

      We got Roman Catholicism (and all that entails) several centuries later when Emporer Constantine was converted to Christianity. He made Christianity the official religion and the rest is history (until someone rewrites it).

    15. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't let Linus fool you. He is as much a politicial as an "engineer".

      Whenever he makes a decision, and wraps it in his "aw shucks" persona, he's still made a decision, he just makes you feel like there wasn't any other possible decision.

      Whenever he makes a subtle jab at RMS, he's playing politics. I remember the recent thread when he said DRM in the kernel was okay. Well, RMS wrote the GPL, and RMS has repeatedly stated that Free software can't forbid anyone for using software for whatever purposes they like. Including human rights violations, let alone pissy stuff like DRM.

      But Linus said about this revalation: "that's why RMS calls me 'just an engineer'".

      That's politics: agreeing with someone yet pretending you are taking an opposite position.

      I'm not saying Linus is an egomaniac (and I don't think RMS is one either for that matter), but he just has his own style.

    16. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You gotta wonder, what kind of "capitalism" allows a company to maintain an 85% profit margin for years?

      In other words, where are all the folks who will make an OS for 80%, 70%, 10%, 5%, etc? How come it's still so hard to get a mainstream PC with Linux pre-installed?

      In my econ classes, free markets drove profit margins DOWN.

    17. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      No, the Romans were tolerant of other religions so long as they could assimilate them.

      Christianity (and Druidism in Britain) were not susceptible to assimilation, with their belief in a single God (or the Trinity, in both cases) being the major obstacle. Several parts of the older British religion(s) were assimilated (Sulis-Minerva, for example), but both Druidism and Christianity were a threat to the Roman mindset, and were ruthlessly persecuted.

      Mr Sakamura is, in fact, being very scathing towards Bill Gates - we don't see that, because he is scrupulously polite in doing so.

      What he says is: Gates is entitled to be a capitalist (but that course is inherently wrong).

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    18. Re:God bless you, Mr. Sakamura. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Why can't we (in the western world) get this type of soft-spoken wisdom to be the face of OSS, and not the curmudgeonly off-putting geekazoidness of RMS?

      But we do have such a person. Have you read anything from Linus Torvalds in the past 5 years?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  27. Apples and Oranges by KingDaveRa · · Score: 1

    This is comparing two different things. Its like comparing QNX to Windows. TRON isn't an end user's OS, or even a server OS. Its a turnkey solution. I think there's a lot of noise being made over nothing here.

    1. Re:Apples and Oranges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know that Microsoft has been trying to muscle into the embedded market, don't you?

  28. from the article by newsdee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "It's not good to charge people for using something which is like a social infrastructure. It also inhibits the development of the computer industry. The very basic infrastructure should be free," he said.

    Good idea. I want my free phone, my free internet, and my free electricity as well.

    Seriously though, it seems that he's not making a distinction between "free as in speech" and "free as in beer"...

    1. Re:from the article by KjetilK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good idea. I want my free phone, my free internet, and my free electricity as well.

      That's physical infrastructure, mostly. A different matter alltogether.

      Seriously though, it seems that he's not making a distinction between "free as in speech" and "free as in beer"...

      True, but perhaps he's just thinking in different terms than the Free Software community.

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    2. Re:from the article by Vajsvarana · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Good idea. I want my free phone, my free internet, and my free electricity as well.

      He said "basic infrastructure", which is correct. Don't know where you live, but here in Italy, as in many other european countries, we pay phone, electricity and internet per-use.
      But the backbones and first deployments (the very basic infrastructure) of these three services are government funded. That is, free for the user.

    3. Re:from the article by Soko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good idea. I want my free phone, my free internet, and my free electricity as well.

      Seriously though, it seems that he's not making a distinction between "free as in speech" and "free as in beer"...


      Those are goods and services that cost the provider of the goods and services a lot of money to reproduce. Actually, you can run a power station, ISP and Telephone system all on your own if you wish. The cost of doing so, relative to reproducing a software package, is astronomical. IOW, with digital content, supply == demand at almost $0 per copy.

      Besides, he said "social infrastructure", which implies it's a basic societal building block, like the free exchange of ideas. Sounds to me like he has the free speach/free beer thing straight.

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    4. Re:from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of thought has been my motivation for using Linux from the start, or actually for not liking MS.
      Think roads (at least in US, I don't drive elsewhere). If every road were a toll road, it would cost more to travel further. it would discourage travel. since not all are, you can drive coast to coast if you decide to. Yeah, you actually pay for it, but it's upkeep and it's not based on how much you use the roads. that kind of infrastructure encourages better uses of it.

    5. Re:from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      True, but perhaps he's just thinking in different terms than the Free Software community.


      You're joking? That means RMS isn't preaching loud enough! I must remind him to speak LOUDER and to interrupt people if it sounds as if they're going to disagree. That should do it.
    6. Re:from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok. Move to Canada, eh? Enjoy all the free stuff that democratic socialism gets you.

    7. Re:from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know anybody (100's) who supports the Canadian goverment or it's system. Infact most I know of are talking about an aggressive take over. It's an internal matter.

      Pretty bad when the biggest security threat to a countries citizens are it's goverment. After call after call for reform and a goverment that pretends success in action the disenfranchised out number the voters 2 to 1.

      There is no recall, there is no way to hold the goverment responsible for it actions. Law suits have been illegal by the senate when the defendent is the goverment.

      In no way is this goverment ligit and therefore it's process by UN standards.

    8. Re:from the article by kliment · · Score: 1

      I want my free phone
      Well, the marginal cost of an additional phone call is zero all the way untill the cell's or network's limit is reached. Phone calls could be free, if users owned and maintained the infrastructure

      my free internet
      Similarly, if users owned routers and interconnections, the marginal cost of network use would be zero. Only the fixed costs would have to be paid

      my free electricity as well
      Once there is a source of cheap, low-scale power production that is clean and efficient, everyone could produce their own electricity, again at a marginal cost of zero. See slashdot discussion of the topic from a few days ago

      My point? As Tony Walter said in his 1989 book, what is physically possible could be economically possible. It is not impossible to have free infrastructure, but it cannot be implemented by profit-seeking commercial entities, or it will not be free. Similarly information could be free, since the marginal cost of reproducing information is zero. A society where information is free and use of infrastructure is free, innovation will increase rapidly. People will no longer be afraid to discuss their ideas because they cannot afford to communicate or because they are afraid that someone will steal their ideas. A good analogy would be a shop owned by its customers, where they could never be afraid of too-high prices, since where would the profits go? Back to the customers themselves.

    9. Re:from the article by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Good idea. I want my free phone, my free internet, and my free electricity as well.

      It's more like free education, free water, and free roads.

      Yes, those things are typically paid for with taxes but some people argue that infrastructure software (like operating systems) should also be paid for with taxes.

    10. Re:from the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want my free...

      Interesting court induced punishment, instead of charging the corporation for monopoly behaviour or price gouging. Work for nothing until the ill gotten gain is gone.

  29. 2 Best Quotes by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since no one RTFA (but me :) here's 2 really good quotes:

    "It's not good to charge people for using something which is like a social infrastructure. It also inhibits the development of the computer industry. The very basic infrastructure should be free," he said.

    Should? I don't know. But it certainly would be a great help to the advancement of the software industry.

    Asked about the operating system inside his own computer, Sakamura smiles broadly. "TRON, of course. I don't use Windows."

    That's obligatory, but still amusing.

  30. Re:Get it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember that... Trace on would show each line number as the program ran; great debugging tool.

  31. Which is more deployed? by yerricde · · Score: 2, Funny

    If TRON is more deployed than *BSD, then TRON has less of a chance of dying.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Which is more deployed? by Coward+the+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      Considering this is the first time most Slashdotters have heard of this TRON OS but everyone here knows of the BSDs, I give them a much higher survival rate.

      --
      -- Jason
    2. Re:Which is more deployed? by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Especially considering that Mac OS X runs on top of Darwin, a BSD. I think I read somewhere that Mac OS X is now the most-distributed Unix-family OS.

    3. Re:Which is more deployed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people here have heard of the Sinclair ZX-81, how do you rate its survival?

  32. if TRON is anything like Japanese cars.. by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can get a 14 foot spoiler and Type R stickers for my operating system!

    1. Re:if TRON is anything like Japanese cars.. by fermion · · Score: 1

      and given some of the silly case mods featured here on /., I am sure you would.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  33. So...the USA blocked it's adoption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So...let me get this straight: The USA blocked it's [ TRON ] adoption in JAPANESE SCHOOLS, because it was unfair trade practice?

    Am I missing something?

    And while I'm at it: Bussinesses don't innovate. They sell. Scientists innovate, and are hampered and held back by bussinessmen. That is how it has always worked, and how it always will work. When we finally get our collective heads out of our asses, maybe we can actually start working on our future.

    1. Re:So...the USA blocked it's adoption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we finally get our collective heads out of our asses.

      What I do with my Pez is my own damn business.

      Goddamn republicans.

    2. Re:So...the USA blocked it's adoption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bussinesses don't innovate. They sell. Scientists innovate"...

      So what if you are a scientist that owns a business??

    3. Re:So...the USA blocked it's adoption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the US did a good job preventing Japanese schools using TRON products calling it "unfair trade practice" threatning harsh retaliation in other fields. God Bless America!!

    4. Re:So...the USA blocked it's adoption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world's out biatch. If you don't like it, move to another world. Oh you can't? TOUGH SHIT. Now bend over, I'm in the mood for some American style loving.

    5. Re:So...the USA blocked it's adoption? by herc_mk2 · · Score: 1

      Then, odds are you're either one or the other. It's pretty tough to do both well.

    6. Re:So...the USA blocked it's adoption? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Interesting how adopting a free open source OS was an "unfair trade practice" (how?). Thankfully (Munich et al) that view seems to be changing. (Yes, I know that they're spending more for it. Customization and training aren't free.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    7. Re:So...the USA blocked it's adoption? by smccrory · · Score: 1

      Such adolescent tripe. If scientists were so innovative they'd figure out a way to feed their families without drawing paychecks from corporations and universities. Go fund a scientist for 5 years at $50,000/yr (oh, and remember to add health insurance, COBRA, SSI and office overhead to that outflow) and tell me you don't have any expectations on what they spend their time on. Hampered indeed.
      Scott

    8. Re:So...the USA blocked it's adoption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientists create
      Engineers innovate
      Bussinessmen sell

      At least that's the way it's suppose to be.

  34. Good to see... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm glad that this analogy has been represented in a mainstream news-source:
    That means the codes making up a program can be obtained free of charge, allowing engineers to modify it according to their needs, like a chef improvising on an original recipe.
    This and the whole article's take on "open source" is helpful to the cause by making people understand in their own terms What It's All About(TM). :o)
    1. Re:Good to see... by ThrasherTT · · Score: 1

      The recipe analogy is fine and good, but I don't see many successful restaurants giving out their recipes. For example, I'd love to have the recipe for Baja Fresh's "Salsa Baja." It is an improvisation of some original salsa recipe, I'm sure. However, they aren't giving it away, are they?

      --

      All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
    2. Re:Good to see... by zwaffle · · Score: 1

      "Cucumbers on a Pizza!! Are you crazy?!"

    3. Re:Good to see... by bwalling · · Score: 1

      This and the whole article's take on "open source" is helpful to the cause by making people understand in their own terms What It's All About(TM). :o)


      Yeah, the impression they are getting from this article is to charge for software. Do you think the average person wants to live an average life or have Bill Gates' money?

    4. Re:Good to see... by fizbin · · Score: 1

      No, they aren't.

      On the other hand, if you taste Salsa Baja and say "Oh - that taste is oregano; I'll have to start adding oregano to my salsa", they won't come after you with lawyers screaming about the contract printed on your menu.

    5. Re:Good to see... by futuresheep · · Score: 1

      But the knowledge on how to make a food item is there. Every Salsa is an improvisation on the original salsa, just like every store brand ketchup is an improvisation on the original ketchup. Think of code as a part of software in the same way that you would think of ingredients for food as a part of the final dish.

      Companies may not hand out their code, but similar products can be made by having the programming knowledge necessary to duplicate the product. MS Office and Openoffice I think are a good example of this. Similar products in the same way that Heinz and Hunts ketchup are similar, yet when used they taste slightly different.

      There are also many successful restaurants that will hand out their recopies if you ask. Most of them are privately owned and believe in sharing food with people as their reason for being there. Chains on the other hand seem to think that they need to keep their 'Baja Salsa' recipe a secret, again, very much like the software industry.

    6. Re:Good to see... by arose · · Score: 1

      How you asked for it? And actualy RMS has used the recipe analogy for some time now.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  35. Unknown? by femto · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How can TRON be unknown when it running on 60% of the world's microprocessors? (according to the article). Someone knew about it. One could accuse it of not being publicised, but I wouldn't put it in the unknown class.

    In actual fact, TRON is one of the standards of the embedded world and most students should hear about it in any embedded/microprocessor course they do.

    1. Re:Unknown? by herc_mk2 · · Score: 1
      Do you know what software (or firmware) your microwave runs? Or your cell phone, or GPS or smart card? Well, this is /., but I'll bet most people can't.

      In all likelyhood, the majority of engineers designing the devices don't even know about it, only the smaller number of software engineers that are porting it.

      It would be nice to see it covered (or at least mentioned!) in university curricula, though...

  36. TRON need not be embedded by kahei · · Score: 4, Informative


    There are various areas in the TRON project. BTRON would be the desktop-OS oriented part, and that's where the Chokanji OS comes from, still the best environment for DTP in Japanese.

    I can remember when TRON was going to save us all from Unicode with its TRON Multilingual Environment. It didn't work out but it did result in quite a nice platform for Mojikyo.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  37. 3 funny? You people are pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you lenny bruce, what would we do without your comedic stylings?

  38. well it sounds pretty cool.... by pulse2600 · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...but I'll only use it if it sucks me into the computer, puts me in a blue suit, and lets me hurl those lightning disc thingies at the MCP...

    1. Re:well it sounds pretty cool.... by Tiado · · Score: 1

      Back in line, program!

  39. Screenshots for Desktop TRON be here by RevAaron · · Score: 5, Informative
    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  40. Please leave Apple out of this discussion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the way, what has oranges to do with Windoze? :)

  41. Well done geniouses by Bijin+Ahandi+(Score4 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now where is the URL of the homepage of this 3 billion users OS?

    It doesn't have?

    Is it only "for those who know"?

  42. Note to self- by EzekielQ · · Score: 4, Funny

    TROFF. -)

  43. Enough movie jokes... by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

    Here's the game!

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  44. Yeah right, by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    Had Sakamura decided to charge even one cent to each user of TRON, he would easily be a dollar billionaire by now, possibly even rivalling Gates, reputed to be the world's richest man with a fortune estimated at $43 billion by Forbes magazine.



    And then Disney would be 43 BILLION richer when they took his money for copyright infringement... just for fun.

    Even with all of that money, they still wouldn't have put enough members into the dev team effort into making Tron 2.0 worth anything more than your average movie license game.

    Handy tip: if you don't have anything new to bring to the table since light cycles were done on the coin-op game, then do something new. JUST A HINT.... Half-Life 2 will be sitting on the shelf next to you very soon.

  45. Question: what language is TRON implemented in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting


    What programming language is TRON implemented in? Inquiring programmers want to know...

  46. Yes but.. by Hellraisr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Where can we download it from???


    You know you want to.

    1. Re:Yes but.. by 2TecTom · · Score: 2, Informative
      B-Free

      but seems to be /.'d

      Also ODP - Tron

      --
      Words to men, as air to birds.
  47. Not Unix by MulluskO · · Score: 1

    Hey look! It's an open source operating system that isn't based upon Unix and is successful. Wow!

    --

    Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    1. Re:Not Unix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should we call it GNU/TRON then?

  48. Assuming is silly ... by torpor · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... but underestimating the effect which TRON has had on the industry is also silly. TRON was designed to run *everywhere* - circa 70's era technology - and has.

    The JAVA guys found big inspiration in TRON as a project, and in fact there is reason to believe that Sun held the TRON project up as an example of 'embedded processing' done right in the early days of the JAVA project.

    To underestimate how much this would've been worth, had it not been for a little slack licensing, is to discount the story here.

    Projects like this ARE worth lots, and lots, and lots of money.

    And while TRON may not be the mega-system it was supposed to be (actually, it was supposed to be the worlds biggest computing system), all of this is still feasible with Linux.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  49. All your tron ... by mthreat · · Score: 0

    are belong to us.

  50. I want to see it by Bruha · · Score: 1

    While I like linux and all I'm always willing ot see new things. He said he's using Tron on his pc and I wonder how portable it is.. Wish he'd release it :) or better yet maybe he can work on Linux to help it not ever freeze which is also very rare but not impossible.

  51. MICROSOFT used trade rules? by ShinmaWa · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Microsoft/U.S. goverment used trade rules

    Ummmmm... WTF?

    The article made no mention that Microsoft did anything whatsoever to block TRON using trade rules or anything else for that matter. There are only three mentions of Microsoft in the article.
    1. having developed an operating system that is more widely used than even Microsoft Corp's Windows
    2. What sets the two systems apart -- and the fortunes of Sakamura and Gates -- is that while Windows must be bought from Microsoft, TRON is distributed free of charge
    3. When it was first revealed in 1984, TRON, which can be modified for use on personal computers, was hailed in Japan as a homemade software which could break the dominance of Microsoft and free Japanese computer firms from the burden of paying for the basic software

    I'm not sure of how much dominance Microsoft had in 1984!! These were the days of the Commodore 64 and Apple ][. The IBM compatible wasn't a market leader at the time -- let alone Microsoft. Microsoft didn't have the money nor the clout to block anything.
    --
    The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
    1. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure of how much dominance Microsoft had in 1984!! These were the days of the Commodore 64 and Apple ][. The IBM compatible wasn't a market leader at the time

      You have your history slightly messed up.

      Yes, MS was a market dominator at the time. Not as much as it is now, but it certainly had the burgeoning PC market tied up. IBM was the market leader at the time, and was totally dominant. There were compatibles out by this time (Compaq debuted in 1982), but this was the heyday of "IBM compatible" -- meaning that it ran MS-DOS and could run intensive applications like VisiCalc and MS Flight Simulator. If you wanted to make a PC compatible you only had one OS to chose from -- MS-DOS. IBM used PC-DOS, which was a licensed derivative of MS-DOS. DR-DOS didn't appear until 1988.

      1984 was not the days of the C64 and Apple ][. This was the year that Apple introduced the Macintosh, with the "1984" commercial during the Superbowl. The C64 and AppleII were well on their way to their deathbeds. The mid 80s were the rise of the Mac and Amiga, and the overwhelming adoption of the PC.

      That said, I agree that it's unlikely that MS blocked the adoption of TRON. I would like to know what forces were behind that, but I'm willing to bet the company in question was IBM, not MS.

    2. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From the article:

      When it was first revealed in 1984, TRON, which can be modified for use on personal computers, was hailed in Japan as a homemade software which could break the dominance of Microsoft and free Japanese computer firms from the burden of paying for the basic software.

      But the dream was shattered in 1989 when the United States threatened to designate TRON as an unfair trade barrier under its Super 301 trade law when it learned of plans by the Japanese government to use the software for computers in schools.

      While Washington in the end did not name TRON as a trade barrier, the Japanese government abandoned the plan and many computer firms severed ties with TRON, fearful of angering the United States, their biggest market.


      I believe the article submitter's point was not that Microsoft blocked the adoption, but that the U.S. government blocked the adoption essentially on Microsoft's behalf. They may or may not have specifically wanted to benefit Microsoft, but Microsoft was the beneficiary. Their intention, one assumes, would have been "to protect U.S. desktop operating system makers", but in 1989 that meant Microsoft and, well, Microsoft.

      This still sounds awfully wierd, i'm surprised the U.S. would be able to get away with something like that and I suspect the cnn.com author *may* be glossing over something, but that's not the article submitters' fault. What's Super 301? Is there any documentation of this act besides this article? I'd go look, but I have to go run to the airport to drop someone off sorry -_-

    3. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the wake of what happened at the NYT, you would think that editors would start to read the stuff reporters print. The slightest bit of research would show that in 1984 MS did not have any market dominance whatsoever.

    4. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... Apple IIe's were used in my school all the way up through the early 1990s. And friends of mine still used their C64s well beyond that.

    5. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      This still sounds awfully wierd, i'm surprised the U.S. would be able to get away with something like that and I suspect the cnn.com author *may* be glossing over something, but that's not the article submitters' fault.

      Hardly. The US participates in economic protectionism on a very regular basis. Hell, with Canada, their #1 trading partner, there was the soft wood lumber dispute, not to mention embargos on Canadian grain. And we're part of a free trade agreement! I can only imagine what the US does to it's other trading partners...

    6. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Frodo2002 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why is this behaviour "awefully weird"? The U.S. routinely engages in such practices. Perhaps these examples will futher enlighten you: (1) Currently the U.S. subsidizes its farmers to the tune of $8 billion over the next 5 years. In addition the U.S. is negotiating trade agreements with third world countries. These countries are (a)in these agreements (if agreement is reached) forbidden to subsidize their farmers, (b) forbidden to protect their farmers from lower priced U.S. imports which will cripple the local farming industry. In fact, if such a country wants to get any financial support from the world bank etc... they are obliged to follow such economic policies which place them at a disadvantage as compared to the first world. Talk about damned whatever you do. (2)(Happily as of a news report this morning this situation may be improving but....) Up until today, the U.S. government has used threats of economic reprisals in the form of trade tarrifs and/or sanctions etc... to stop poor African countries from buying generic alternatives to expensive anti-retroviral drugs for combatting Aids. Now, on the one hand, you could argue that intellectual property of the big pharmaceutical companies is being protected. On the other hand, the lives of millions of poeple have been held to ransom so as to protect the profits of American and British drug companies. The drug companies' stance becomes laughable when you consider that no poor country can afford the drugs anyway, so almost none are being bought.

    7. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here you go:

      What is Section 301?

    8. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Baumi · · Score: 1
      Their intention, one assumes, would have been "to protect U.S. desktop operating system makers", but in 1989 that meant Microsoft and, well, Microsoft.

      What about Apple? Had M$ already won the desktop by 1989?

      Jens
    9. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by qtp · · Score: 1

      What's Super 301?

      Super 301 is a regulation that requires the US government to place trade restrictions on countries found to be engaging in "unfair business practices". Look here (section 1.6 item 7) for more info.

      Is there any documentation of this act besides this article?

      Google search.

      --
      Read, L
    10. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Or Atari? Or Commodore?

    11. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by jak163 · · Score: 1
      This still sounds awfully wierd, i'm surprised the U.S. would be able to get away with something like that and I suspect the cnn.com author *may* be glossing over something, but that's not the article submitters' fault. What's Super 301? Is there any documentation of this act besides this article?

      This was an act passed by Congress that enabled it to institute punitive tariffs in cases of unfair trade practices. This was back in the days of Voluntary Export Restrictions on Japanese cars and fears that all U.S. industries would go the way of the VCR, television, and portable electronics markets. These fears pretty much ended with the beginning of the Japanese recession in the early 1990s.

      It's an interesting idea though that the U.S. dominance of the computer space was in fact due to strategic trade and not technical innovation, as is usually thought.

    12. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by strombrg · · Score: 1


      Actually, I believe that the TRS-80, C64, Apple II and even Atari 800 had Microsoft derived BASIC implementations as their "OS". My friends used to criticize Atari BASIC for not being Microsoft, but it actually was - they just had to rip out the normal string arrays to make it fit on an 8K cartridge.

    13. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The slightest bit of research would show that in 1984 MS did not have any market dominance whatsoever.

      I think you are mistaken. Microsoft has always been dominant. Windows is the only operating system that has ever been used on computers. I suppose next you'll tell me there was a time when we weren't at war with Iraq.

    14. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their intention, one assumes, would have been "to protect U.S. desktop operating system makers", but in 1989 that meant Microsoft and, well, Microsoft. What of Apple?

    15. Re:MICROSOFT used trade rules? by ShinmaWa · · Score: 1

      this was the heyday of "IBM compatible"

      In 1984, there were a number of IBM-compatible manufacturers out there, but all of them put together did not have any form of market dominance. The IBM-compatible was just too expensive for most people and businesses.

      At the time, Commodore ruled the roost. The Commodore VIC-20 a couple years earlier was the best selling computer of all time, only to be surpassed by the Commodore 64 which debuted in 1982. It was hardly on its deathbed when it was the world's best selling computer!

      The Apple ][ was a close second. Yes, the Macintosh was introduced that year, but it did not have immediate market dominance (in fact, to this day, it never did). The Apple ][ was still being sold and millions of units were in use around the world. It too was hardly on its deathbed.

      The IBM-compatible did not really gain ground until the Tandy 1000 was produced and priced at a level that the masses could afford. However, the Tandy 1000 did not come out until late 1984 and, like all new products, took time for it to be sold in enough quantities to have an effect on the marketplace -- certainly longer than would be needed to meet the timeframe of Microsoft's supposed influence to the US government to threaten invokation of a Super 301 trade limit.

      --
      The /. Effect: Thousands of users simultaneously accessing a site to not read its content.
  52. scary stuff by ratfynk · · Score: 2
    " Microsoft/U.S. goverment used trade rules (Super 301) to block it adoption by schools in Japan"

    If this statement is true then the implications are that MS really is out to control digital information and communications world wide. If the US state department has a hand in this kind of bull, then things are not rosy for the future linux and open source. Kind of makes you wonder which part of the world is actually "The Free World".

    If this is true ignoring open source might make Orwells 1984 look like a rainstorm at a church picnic.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
    1. Re:scary stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this statement is true

      This is the important part... "IF".

      While I'm not harboring any illusions about the nature of trade laws and corporations, let's save the tin-foil hats for an occasion with real proof, shall we?

      There's no smoking gun, so save the retro-doomsday pontification for some other day. There's more than enough things to be worried about in the present.

    2. Re:scary stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo I am Canadian, where's the beef, or how would you like to stick that 2/4 into your Nafta. I can believe underhanded crap like this is being done to other countries.

    3. Re:scary stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada (or the richest of) have benifited greatly from free trade. The disproportional amount of money it takes for a US lumber company to cut and process a tree is many times what it is in canada. As with most trade betweeen the US and canadian relationship. NAFTA has protected canada from high tarrif's in the US economy too many times.

      If a country doesn't keep it's ability to produce it's steel the lack of production steps into the realm of national security. Internally motivated trade may offset cost of production enough to be competative, or a quick 9/10's cut in labor force.

  53. How is TRON and Nucleus related? by Esben · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how TRON (The Real-time Operation Nucleus)
    is related to the real time operating system you offered at
    http://www.atinucleus.com/

    Is the word "Nucleus" related anyway? There are a few faint references to TRON on the Nucleus-site

  54. obTronBukkake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to spew my hot, sticky jizz all over Lora's glasses!

    1. Re:obTronBukkake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am intrigued by your ideas, and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

  55. Re:But what about? by zome · · Score: 1

    It's not uncommon for the US to use trade laws as a weapon.

    In this case, the US might tell the Japanese gov that, if they adopt Tron, there will be 500% increase in tax for every import car from Japan. Something like that.

    Every gov. of the country trading with the US knows this practice all too well.

  56. well if this guy... by drwhite · · Score: 1

    ...did sell his o/s for some dough twenty years ago...he would be gates and gates would be a nobody...so if this happened we would all be saying
    "death to TRON!!!!"

    1. Re:well if this guy... by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      "Well if you were me then I'd be you, and I'd use your body to get to the top! You can't stop me no matter who you are!"
      -Jim Carrey - Ace Ventura 2 -

  57. Sorry to do this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    y y-ooo-u u----fff-aaa-iii l------iii-ttt
    Y Y O O-U U----F---A A--I--L-------I---T-
    yyy-o o-u u----fff-aaa--i--l-------i---t-
    -Y--O O-U U----F---A A--I--L-------I---T-
    -y--ooo-uuu----f---a a iii-lll----iii--t-
  58. Shut Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Without RMS, Linux and therefore Slashdot wouldn't exist, and you wouldn't have a reason or a forum to post your opinion. He may be smelly and outspoken and personally embarassing to some fraction of the community that despises the concept of "free software" (read: libertariots) rather than "Open Source", but without him we'd have a lot less freedom to work with computers the way we want to, not the corporations or the governments.

    1. Re:Shut Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh brother. Linux would exist and so would Slashdot. Gimme a break.

    2. Re:Shut Up by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1

      No, it is probably true. Linus wrote a kernel because that is all he needed to write: the GNU user-space tools (bash, gcc etc) were already there. Without GNU, what use is a Kernel? (Okay, nowdays there is much more free/open software, and there is the BSD user-space, but that didn't exist or was not available when Linux was first written.) Now, perhaps FreeBSD or some other system would have hit the big time instead, if Linux had never been created. But history would have been very different, especially if said OS used something other than the GPL.

    3. Re:Shut Up by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      and there is the BSD user-space, but that didn't exist or was not available when Linux was first written

      Forked from 386BSD, which predates Linux. History would have been different, but it was railroad time--someone would have built one.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Shut Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, that's right. Linus and others are savvy enough to write a kernel but they certainly wouldn't have been able to write their own shell or ls command. Thank God for GNU because they are the real heroes here.

      Of course a lot of work went into porting the GNU tools to Linux. Oops.

    5. Re:Shut Up by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      Jeez, when did I say that Linus and others were incapable of writing their own shell?

      Of course they were, but the point is (1) a complete set of userspace tools is a huge amount of code, far more than a basic kernel (I'm talking about Linux 1.0 here, not what Linux has since turned into), and (2) such tools already existed, and were freely available.

      Sure, Linus could have started out reinventing gcc, and then gone on to write a shell, file utilities, etc etc etc, to accompany his kernel. But there is a reason why he didn't do this. Isn't it rather obvious why?

    6. Re:Shut Up by IWannaBeAnAC · · Score: 1
      Forked from 386BSD, which predates Linux. History would have been different, but it was railroad time--someone would have built one.

      Exactly. But think about how different it would be, especially with the arguments that go on today with binary modules, or misappropriating free software into proprietary software. I'm not sure whether it would be better or worse - worse probably since the BSD license is more open to abuse IMHO.

  59. Screw that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'm a moral billionaire. Where's my slashdot article?

  60. License? Source code? by molo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can anyone point me to the actual license of this code? (Japanese or English) How about the source code? There seems to be plenty of binaries and specifications available for download.. but source?

    Thanks
    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
  61. Re:But what about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every gov. of the country trading with the US knows this practice all too well.

    And vice versa. It's a two way street, and the US is hardly guilty of being the only nation to use economic ties to get concessions on seemingly unrelated issues. This is the way international trade works-- it's not moral or good, but if you're going to cry "foul!" on America, you'd also better point out the abuses that have been and still are being carried out elsewhere. (China comes most readily to mind.)

  62. well? by the_greywolf · · Score: 1

    where's my download, damnit?

    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  63. GNU/TRON? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think RMS would be happy... we could all do the GNU/TRON dance.

    Maybe someone should forward this story to Darl, get him time to get his lawsuit ready.

    1. Re:GNU/TRON? by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      GNU/TRON particles?! Quick, eject the core!!!

    2. Re:GNU/TRON? by arose · · Score: 1

      No youre wrong they combined TRON with Linux and named it T-Linux...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  64. It smells .. by ciupman · · Score: 1

    TIME TRAVEL to me .. ;) he went back 1984 and released it's Master degree thesis (aka TRON) back then .. and this story came up today!! Have you looked at windows 1.0 ? My Washing Machine LCD controler has more functionality than that .. Now having that windows version to "block" TRON (suposedly more powerfull and free) is not very feasable .., so the story might not be very well told!.. And i forgot .. back then Windows was not even a SO .. was only a UI

    --
    I fuse with Mercer every single day...
  65. TRON or TCPA? by raduga · · Score: 1
    From his programming, TRON was actually, entirely beholden to the Users, who he regarded as mythical, god-like beings. He may have turned a few keys- even de-rezzed a few others, but he was made to serve the Users by seeking out and terminating illegal processes. Unfortunately, it turned out that the OS itself was illegal (Pirating warez!) so he had to shut that down, too.

    What we don't get to see, is 10ms after the story ended, the system hung with a BSOD.

    Kudos to Disney for early recognition that nerdy corporate software developers get all the babes, and software pirates wear black, and are despicable vermin.

    --
    First, nothing begins if not opening
    1. Re:TRON or TCPA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I never owned a black helicopter with k-rad red neon on it!

    2. Re:TRON or TCPA? by CharterTerminal · · Score: 1

      And let's not forget that "reindeer flotilla" is the best password ever.

  66. If only he had charged for it! by clambake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    that the developer (Ken Sakamura, a University professor) would be worth mucho if he had just charged for it

    Think about it, if he had only charged a billion dollars per copy, at 3 billion units sold, he'd have more money than all the countries of the world put together! Woah, what if he charged a TRILLION dollars per copy. He could buy the solar system!

    Yeah, that's not how it works.. Probably the reason why it IS so wide spead is because it was free...

  67. Some GPL code here. by pario · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can download come code off this Japanese page. Just click the first link in the right column.

    TOPPERS is a GPL implementation of the ITRON (Industrial TRON) specifiction for embedded computers. You can find more information about it in this paper.

  68. some real numbers... $350million by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    some googling found that there were about 20 billion processors in 2000, and they are being made at about 5 billion/year, so in 2003 there should be 35 billion. At a penny a piece, that's only $350 million. 4.3 Trillion (to equal Gate's wealth) is still far away... at this rate (linearily and thats a *really* bad assumption when we know it's closer to exponetial), that will take 850 more years. But, by then the cryogenically frozen gates will have had time to earn some interest on his money. If he plays it safe with 5% interest, then he'll have $4.4e27.

  69. government funded != free by BreadMan · · Score: 1

    So you paid for the basic infastructure with taxes. I live out in the country in the US and where I'm at, the water, electricity and natural gas infastructure were all priviately developed and low cost.

    The nearest town was wired by the Rural Electrification Project and the city still owns the power grid. Electricity costs twice as much. The water and sewer systems were WPA projects too, and they also cost more.

    As far as I'm concerned the best very basic infastructure the government can fund is contract enforcement and honest money.

  70. IT WORKS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If DOS/V is related to btron, then i've used one flavor of it at one time or another. It was back when I was still on my Pentium 100 trying to play hentai games =)

    1. Re:IT WORKS! by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      DOS/V is just DOS with a back-end that allows the computer to handle Shift-JIS text properly.

      BTW anyone have a copy of it...I'd like to try to bring more Japanese-native text messages to FreeDOS/V.

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
  71. Favourite Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sakamura said he was puzzled by the initial U.S. move and disappointed at the reaction of Japanese firms, but it allowed him to concentrate on the original aim of developing TRON for use on microprocessors rather than on computers."

    Yeah, let Windows and Linux fight it out over the computer market - Tron can run on just a microprocessor...

  72. Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider that a very useful function of TRON is it's ability to display a wide range of Japanese and Chinese characters...

    I wouldn't guarantee you a "Type R" sticker but you can probably have your fill of silly stuff written in Chinese you can't read. Reminds me of a car I saw driving around with Japanese text on his bumper, literally it read "i'm a big stupid!"

    1. Re:Actually... by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Waaay, off topic, but being as you can read Kanji, you should take a look at these shirts. They're at least good for a laugh.

  73. gentle dig at the American religion of capitalism by dpilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like this line, and IMHO it illustrates much of what is wrong with the USA, today.

    Don't get me wrong, I don't advocate any sort of move to Communism or Socialism, or anything like that.

    But Capitalism is good as a motivator. Greed is a powerful motivator. But it doesn't belong in the same basket as 'air', 'water', 'food', and such. Maybe in the short term, it can sit in the same basket as 'sex'.

    But in the USA, it appears that we've turned Capitalism (perhaps more precisely, greed) into a religion. IMHO this particular shuffling of priorities causes an unstable situation.

    Simple demonstration:
    Want to increase profits?
    Move jobs overseas, paying 'local' wages.
    Profit!!! ...but that's not the end of the story...

    Everybody does it, too many jobs move overseas.
    Nobody at home can afford your prices, because they're unemployed.
    Overseas they can't afford your prices, because you never paid them enough.

    Is the profit sustainable, or have you simply ransacked the commons? (one-time)

    Again, not proposing Communism, but to say that Capitalism can exist without a Commons is myopic.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  74. Disney by executebusiness.com · · Score: 1

    Somebody phone Disney okay? (I don't know if they have email.)

  75. Takes more then a product to make $ by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    You cant just assume that due to his work he'd have uprooted Microsoft and made billions.

    He would also have needed the 'plan' a giant such as Microsoft had to move along and build the market share.

    Not debating Bills questionable morals, but with out his drive and ambition, there would not have been Microsoft as we know it today.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  76. uITRON API in eCos by Hiroto.+S · · Score: 1

    eCos has ITRON API implemented as a compatibility subsystem.

  77. Pointless article by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    Where are the screenshots? I can't find any, not on the linked article, nor on the official Tron pages.

    I think I'll stick to Linux running Ximian desktop 2 for now.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  78. Tron + Linux = T-Linux by doctor_no · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems that there is already a project underway to integrate Tron with Linux. . .

    Tron + Linux = T-Linux.

    "The T-Engine Forum and MontaVista Software announced that they are collaborating to combine TRON ("The Real-time Operating system Nucleus") -- the long-dominant Japanese embedded operating system -- with embedded Linux, in an effort to create a standardized software architecture for embedded devices that takes advantage of open source software and the benefits of Linux, while retaining a degree of compatibility with TRON."

  79. Super 301 used by the government to stop TRON by truthhurts1 · · Score: 1

    Funny how Microsoft and other Software companies were probably at the heart of this decision yet they want to outsource jobs to INDIA.

  80. do humanity a favour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And everything we've wanted to do with Linux, we can now do with some flavor of Windows.

    Please kill yourself now.

  81. Let's get it right people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It really should be called GNU/TRON.

  82. Re:3 funny? You people are pathetic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, just wait. I'm sure EVERY SINGLE FUCKING "I thoughted TRON was teh moovie hur hur hur" comment is going to be modded to 5. You know, since nerds can laugh at the same obvious joke over, and over, and over, and...

  83. I work on embedded products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And all my coworkers do. And I've interviewed 20-30 people in the last month, all embedded developers. I've never heard of TRON nor did I see it on any resumes.

    pSOS is a standard of the embeded world. Embedded Linux is. Wind River is. Nucleus is. TRON?

    The 60% thing is surely overstated.

    1. Re:I work on embedded products by femto · · Score: 1
      I can't vouch for the 60% figure, as it just came from the article.

      I can vouch for the fact that I helped write a University course in embedded systems and TRON came into it. According to my sources, TRON is dominant in Asia. I suspect it sees deployment in 'everyday' consumer goods such as whitegoods, not things like routers and IT type stuff. This probably accounts for the figures.

  84. Is it really that big a surprise... by zinkem · · Score: 0

    ...to see a major media company like CNN over simplifying things?

    And I think we all know why they make statements like that (otherwise it wouldn't be an interesting article to people who don't know any better)...

    --
    I can't think of a good sig...
  85. Irony by telbij · · Score: 1

    And how much money did Disney make off that movie and subsequent merchandising?

  86. if ever there was proof of.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the decline of what passes for western journalism:

    > that the developer (Ken Sakamura, a University professor) would be worth mucho if he had just charged for it,

    Any mention of just maybe it wouldn't be

    > more widely distributed than Windows

    if he had charged for it? And ol' Ken-sen's 'product' might not be so widely distributed, nor would he be 'worth mucho'.

  87. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by rmezzari · · Score: 0

    The only problem in your logic being: If everybody else is doing it and I am not, then I'm going bankrupt soon enough and I will not be able to feed myself then. You, sir, are full of hipocrisy, since I'm sure that if you were the owner of a business and get struck between sending other people's job overseas (and feeding some poor schmuck back there in the menatime) or letting your company go titsup (and firing a lot more people in the process), you will also ship some jobs overseas. Get real.

    --
    "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds !"
  88. I wipe my ass with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... paper one yen notes. The Nipponese gub-mint prints em on rolls for toilet paper. All proceeds go to education and for building new airports.

  89. what license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what license is it released under?
    are there any desktop screenshots? I'd love to see them, and compare them to those of QNX. That would be informative!

  90. Help us! Here come the themes. by suso · · Score: 1

    Now some blokes are going to go make a BTron OS theme or whatnot for GTK, Sawfish, Enlightenment, Blackbox, twm+... All based on a couple of screenshots!!!

  91. This just in... by greymond · · Score: 1

    If the Gentoo Founders had not open sourced Gentoo they might have made Millions!!!! Oh wait - no then Linus never would have fixed their shitty ass kernal and called it Linux.....

    Maybe if he had sold his kernal to them and then they charged for it they could be worth BILLIONS...

    Yes I am speaking utter nonsense - because thats what this story is...

  92. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by dpilot · · Score: 1

    I don't deny that I would be forced to send jobs overseas, too. We don't really disagree.

    I'm merely saying that Capitalism requires constraints in order to be stable. Capitalism itself will not protect the Commons that are necessary for its survival. The Commons must be protected by *enough participants* doing so out of their own enlightenment/goodwill or it must be protected by force of Law.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  93. Trade Barriers by Beliskner · · Score: 1
    But the dream was shattered in 1989 when the United States threatened to designate TRON as an unfair trade barrier under its Super 301 trade law when it learned of plans by the Japanese government to use the software for computers in schools.
    Why is this even mentioned? The US does this with most products across the entire spectrum - why do Toyota cars cost much more than Ford (they used to be cheaper)?

    I bet the real reason the US invaded Iraq and invented WMD was because Iraq didn't sign the DMCA.

    UnAmerican posts get modded down ;-( tyranny of the majority. Should the CEO of Nike go to jail if one his globalised workers in China gets harmed making Nike shoes?

    --
    A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    1. Re:Trade Barriers by thebigmacd · · Score: 1

      "why do Toyota cars cost much more than Ford (they used to be cheaper)?" Well to be perfectly honest, Toyota puts much more money into built quality and reliablity than Ford for example. You can't make a better car for much cheaper, if cheaper at all. In Canada we can buy both US and Japanese vehicles cheaper than in the States, but still the Japanese ones tend to be more expensive than "domestics". As well, the "imports" are made in the states now too. Price difference really has a lot to do with overall quality.

  94. Kernels versus Linux by cait56 · · Score: 1

    TRON is one of many excellent real-time kernels that are available. They solve a simple problem, so it is not surprising that there are many of them that are excellent. When you application needs a minimal kernel, you can probably select any of several and find it supports your project perfectly well.

    The advantage of moving up to Linux/BSD/Darwin/whatever is that you gain the ability to add a vast library of public domain daemons and applications.

    The disadvantage is that you gain the overhead to support that flexibility.

    it is true that Linux/BSD/etc. can now be considered for a wider range of applications than they could have five years ago. But if your device does not need thsee capabilities, there is no point going with something as complex as Linux or BSD. The real-time kernels, like TRON are a better fit.

    As for translating TRON documentation: I think you're right. Given the availability of several excellent kernels, why would a development team pick the one with documentation they can't read?

  95. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    What if US workers agreed to work for the same or lower rates as overseas workers? Cost is the employer's motivator. Just because you may live in the US does not mean you are guarenteed a higher quality of life than other people on this planet.

  96. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by Tharn · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Myopic is not looking past the first step of the capitalistic process. What happens is that labour overseas stops being quite so cheap as more and more labour is demanded. Eventually there is a natural equalization between the economy you are "abusing" and your own. No, it is not 100% good for your own economy to export jobs, but at the same time, it is not catestrophic either. Also, this HIGHLY conservative behavior has the most liberal effect of bringing poorer nations more in line with western standards of living (while bringing down the west somewhat). That is the true VALUE of capitalism - if left alone, it will always self-equalize.

  97. Re: Thanks for the links but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the links but after going to the first one I was blinded by the color scheme....I think I have a headache now and I have to stop working and go home....I guess there is a plus side :P

  98. Ken would have made nothing if he charged for it by dylan95 · · Score: 1

    > Ken Sakamura, a University professor) would be worth mucho if he had just charged for it.

    I don't believe that. If he charged for it, then it wouldn't be so popular. If Linus had been charging for Linux since day 1, think it would be as popular today?

  99. Flavors of Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I noticed ITRON (industrial Tron) and BTRON (business tron) and CTRON (comm Tron).... they didn't discuss the Tron's which are such a huge part of Japan these days: FFTRON (fecal fascination Tron), BKTRON (bukkakke Tron) or SBTRON (snatch blurring Tron)...

  100. more flavors by gnudutch · · Score: 1

    Lots of Japanese industrial equipment runs TRON. It's a trip running a Japanese OS.

  101. Freely available download ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Searched the tron related web sites and could not find anywhere to download this supposedly free open source os.

    Anyone have any location for this and maybe some documentation in English.

  102. Would he have really been "worth mucho"? by WillyLane · · Score: 1
    *The claim is that it is more widely distributed than Windows (in some 3 billion devices
    *world-wide), that the developer (Ken Sakamura, a University professor) would be worth
    * mucho if he had just charged for it...

    Would he have really been "worth mucho"? It seems that his software product only became so widely distributed because he gave it away. If he had charged for it, he would have greatly reduced it's mass adoption.

  103. RTFA - It's not a comparison of OSes by detect · · Score: 1

    TRON man shuns Gates-like fortune


    When it was first revealed in 1984, TRON, which can be modified for use on personal computers, was hailed in Japan as a homemade software which could break the dominance of Microsoft and free Japanese computer firms from the burden of paying for the basic software.


    But the dream was shattered in 1989 when the United States threatened to designate TRON as an unfair trade barrier under its Super 301 trade law when it learned of plans by the Japanese government to use the software for computers in schools.

    --
    // The fastest Alt-Tab in the West
  104. Stubbornness of Ken Sakamura by reporter · · Score: 1
    The official overseas website for TRON is a good resource for understanding TRON. TRON splashed into the US technical journals in the mid 1980s and appeared as a specification for a new 32-bit microprocessor. Dr. Sakamura wrote an article in an old issue of IEEE Micros and details the full architecture of the processor. It is closely related to the 68000 by Motorola.

    Unfortunately, Mr. Sakamura was not aware of key developments in microprocessor development in the USA. Just at the moment that he had announced the new TRON instruction set architecture (ISA), microprocessor development in the USA was undergoing a revolution. Numerous studies in academia were published on how compilers and programmers actually used instructions. The computer-engineering community reached a consensus that complex addressing modes should not be implemented in the hardware. This conclusion was backed by the quantitive statistical measurements of actual programs.

    Unfortunately, the TRON ISA continued the mistake of using complex addressing modes (ala 68000). Instead of simply admitting that he had made a mistake, Dr. Sakamura clings stubbornly to the idea that the TRON ISA is just as good as the ISA of ARM, etc.

    The American government is almost as stubborn as Ken Sakamura. The government viewed the proposed TRON ISA as a threat to the dominance of American microprocessors. This view is understandable since, at that time (mid 1980s), Japanese companies threatened American dominance in a number of American technologies. (One example is DRAM.) The Japanese government had, also, just launched their 5th generation computer project. American officials feared that Japan would soon supplant the USA as the #1 computer manufacturer. So, even though the TRON ISA was clearly inferior to most modern processor ISAs developed by American engineers, the American government went hogwild and demanded that the Japanese government stop developing a personal computer based on the TRON ISA.

    In the end, this American stubbornness actually helped the Japanese government by stopping it from wasting millions of dollars on a project (to build a TRON personal computer) that would have failed. By the way, the 5th generation project was also a massive failure.

    Americans should stop worrying about the superiority of American technology and morals. The 21st century never became PAX Asia despite all the doom and gloom predictions in the late 20th century. The 21st century is PAX Americana. The hordes of Asian immigrants flooding into the USA in order to get the hell out of Asia should have been a big hint.

  105. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by the-build-chicken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    what's wrong with communism...it's only failed because of pressure from capitalist countries...it might have worked quite well without the tension caused by the juxtaposition of two competing ideologies...it's underlying principles are quite sound

  106. HURD Kernel? by marko123 · · Score: 1

    Mr Stallman, your kernel is ready. It's been ready for *cough* twenty years.

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  107. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMFG.

    Try to live with 200$ per month in the US.

    Anywhere.

    Assh*le.

  108. Of Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All trolling aside, I'll wait for a court of law before I offer any words like "duck" or in any way shape or form assist this goverment to good or ill. The process is crooked, it's well known amoung the policy holders as well as proven intent to endanger sympathetic groups for a scapegoat, and instituted surpression (use of repression)->pratical uses of psychology.

    Who know what's been lost, cure for breast cancer, food shortages, etc...

  109. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $200??!?! u rich fat bastard.
    try $30.

  110. mod this up by Skankmofo · · Score: 1

    someone mod this up

    --
    "A great deal of intelligence can be invested in ignorance when the need for illusion is deep." --Saul Belloe
  111. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by Aexia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What if US workers agreed to work for the same or lower rates as overseas workers? Cost is the employer's motivator. Just because you may live in the US does not mean you are guarenteed a higher quality of life than other people on this planet.

    The problem is differences in cost of living. The dollar goes a lot further in India than it does in even the cheapest parts of the US.

    For $X/a month, a worker in India would probably have a *higher* standard of living than a US worker being paid the same amount.

    It isn't that US workers are demanding high pay to live a life of luxury; it's that the cost of living here requires them to. But I guess it's US workers' fault that they aren't willing to relocate their families to a foreign country to continue working.

  112. Doomed to repeat history? by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Your anon coward post sounds like one from
    'Those who ingnore the past.'
    The pull of a company that can dictate the future of digital communication and through market manipulation control innovation is the whole problem. IBM is certainly not innocent of this sort of corporate despotism. History is littered with instances of little people with a Napolean complex, sad to say I feel the leadership of Microsoft has become another example. We are all capable of exibiting this kind of behaviour, so if there are no checks and balances like what happened to Standard Oil and Ma Bell then we are headed for an information dark age. All bow to Redmond.
    I am not looking to get moded up for this post I am only being realistic.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  113. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    If people cannot afford to live in the US, then two things will happen:

    1. sellers will have to sell things for cheaper prices
    2. people will leave the US for cheaper places to live

  114. Not much but by ratfynk · · Score: 1
    Not much but at the bottom of this post is the url of a very interesting other MS trundled OS. He has ported a linux application from the original Tandy OS. An historical views of how certain good companies got hosed is very important.


    As to how many apps are available.
    That is a rediculous question obviously there is very little ported to the TRON OS especially hardware, Win modems etc, etc, etc. There has not been a GNU like structure there to fight the battle. And a battle it has been. So I am sure Tron has very little to offer the oss culture, except perhaps ideas that MS cannot get a software patents for, or if they have prior art rulings may overturn. You can bet MS has gone over TRON with a fine tooth comb decompiler already so if there are any ideas that have been cloned they most likely did not try to patent them. The amount of software for the good old tandy osx (and I do not mean os ten) is most likely enormous by comparison. For more info follow http://hometown.aol.com/knudsenmj/myhomepage/umuse lx.htm
    His page has good info about a similar dead OS.
    Just remember there is no space in the url ending /umuselx.htm wonder why I cannot post a hyperlink, How about that?

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  115. I have the source by eap · · Score: 1

    for the version powering my VCR:

    while(1)
    {
    printf("12:00");
    }

  116. No Jobs & Rich Industrialists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If he had charged for Tron, tens of thousands could be employed in his company and Japan may have a credible software industry.

    Who do you think benefits from his free software most - all the companies that don't have to pay for it, they are the ones creaming off the money the author should have got. So basically he gave up his chance to provide employment to others and gave his money instead to rich industrialists.

    Great idea!!

    1. Re:No Jobs & Rich Industrialists by Zelig321 · · Score: 1

      This may be true, but it's not a question of money for him. He said:

      "It's not good to charge people for using something which is like a social infrastructure. It also inhibits the development of the computer industry. The very basic infrastructure should be free,...."

      So it's about his belief that such things shouldn't be charged for. And this belief leads him to simply disregard the question of money.

      You know, there *are* things in life worth spending all your time/passion and not involving money. Being driven by money only leads to 1 of 2 things: either you make more money, or you lose all your money...In both cases, you lost your initial goals.

  117. Sums up the whole OSS movement.... by snero3 · · Score: 1

    He manages to sum up the whole open source movement for me in a couple of sentences

    "It's not good to charge people for using something which is like a social infrastructure. It also inhibits the development of the computer industry. The very basic infrastructure should be free,"

    --
    It said "windows 98 or better" so I installed Linux
  118. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
    what's wrong with communism...it's only failed because of pressure from capitalist countries...it might have worked quite well without the tension caused by the juxtaposition of two competing ideologies...it's underlying principles are quite sound

    On paper it is a good system and so is unregulated capitalism. The problem is when you introduce either of them to reality. Look at Russia for an example of both. The middle path seems to be the best option as it usually is. Motivation by success but regulation of greed.

    --
    Time makes more converts than reason
  119. TROLL by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    If you're really that stupid, please just shoot yourself in the head. Netscape navigator worked fine in Win3.1, and Mac-OS 6 or whatever it was at that point.

    In fact, Microsoft didn't bet on the internet with windows 95. It shipped with its own, at the time, proprietary network MSN, which sucked ass. In order to develop 'sites' for it you had to pay thousands to MS in order to get Microsoft 'blackbird' software to create them

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:TROLL by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "If you're really that stupid, please just shoot yourself in the head."

      Grow up.

      "Netscape navigator worked fine in Win3.1, and Mac-OS 6 or whatever it was at that point. "

      Netscape was a seperate purchase. Nor does it satisfy all of what I was saying. The Newton had all the stuff a Palm Pilot does, yet it barely got it's name in the history books.

      "In fact, Microsoft didn't bet on the internet with windows 95. It shipped with its own, at the time, proprietary network MSN, which sucked ass. In order to develop 'sites' for it you had to pay thousands to MS in order to get Microsoft 'blackbird' software to create them "

      Really? Then how come my computer that came at the original launch of Windows 95 was ready to be set up on a local ISP?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:TROLL by autopr0n · · Score: 1

      Netscape was a seperate purchase. Nor does it satisfy all of what I was saying. The Newton had all the stuff a Palm Pilot does, yet it barely got it's name in the history books.

      Yup, troll troll troll...

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    3. Re:TROLL by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Yup, troll troll troll..."

      Well, given that nobody can accept the idea that MS actually did some good for the industry, then in a sense you're right.

      Fortunately for you, the definition of troll doesn't include the word 'truth'.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:TROLL by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      NG's right actually. It was a bit of a chicken and the egg type of thing, though.

  120. people, please... by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Wrong. The internet couldn't possibly have been popular without lots (i.e. millions) of people turning it into something interesting. The Win3.1, OS/2 (why'd you even mention that? heh), and Mac audience playing around on the net was not enough to do that. Sorry.

    just stop feeding this troll, you're embarasing yourselves.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  121. Are they allowed to say this in an article? by adyus · · Score: 1

    ...Windows, which controls an estimated 150 million computers. Bill: Damn, there goes my world domination plan!

  122. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by autopr0n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Everybody does it, too many jobs move overseas. Nobody at home can afford your prices, because they're unemployed.

    Yes, but as 'everyone does it' the demand for jobs overseas increases, and as the supply is not unlimited, the price of overseas labor will also increase. At the same time wages over here decrease, until wages in that particular sector have reached parity. Of course, there may be price differences due to regulation and taxation, but they are probably not that different then the costs of shipping, communication, cultural barriers, corruption, etc.

    Nobody at home can afford your prices, because they're unemployed.

    Overseas they can't afford your prices, because you never paid them enough.

    Ah, but we're talking about services and information not goods. So a company with an expanded market share can sell 50 million licenses at $20 rather then 10 million licenses at $100. And this is ignoring differential pricing for different markets as well.

    It constantly amazes me that people calling them 'smart' and 'technically literate' can continue to spout this nonsense that shows nothing other then a complete ignorance of economics. Yeah, it's bad for you in the short term, but better for humanity in general (as long as we have things like minimal working conditions and environmental regulations, etc)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  123. Hrm... by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that Christianity was feared by the Romans because of 1) it's 'newness' and 2) the ferocity of it's worshipers. Early Christians were about as nuts as Hamas and those types of people today.

    And obviously the roman empire eventually 'assimilated' Christianity, obviously.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  124. the mistake is watching the OS and not the users by chanio · · Score: 0

    I don't understand how is it possible that a big part of the LINUX community keep on judging the market by their commercial or technical aspect and not by the users.
    I mean, the users of LINUX-TRON or Windows represent their intention of doing something creative with the OS. It's clear that the more creative the users feel, the more they would tend to use LINUX or every ingenious OS where the tools are available to everybody at any time and unconditionally.
    So, with this point of view, everything would look with the right perspective. Since the more experienced every user is becoming , the more are these 'alternative' OS being visible for everybody.
    One could apply the same logic with WWW business, and understand why isn't it yet possible to become a prosperous web site even if you spend a lot of money on it.
    Alternative OS users shouldn't be measuring the users' interest in opensource to put a price to a distribution. But encourage everybody to start trying something, by playing a lot! (remember: everything is created from crazy acts)

    --
    Rwe obliged 2 save our future by choosing:O3 hole-greenhouse effect instead of accepting everydays gossip-nonsense chat?
  125. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Perhaps. I partly share your opinion. But the time factor plays into it, too. It may be possible to skip from cheap labor market to cheap labor market. As one labor market starts to develop, and get more expensive, move production to another area that is still cheap. Maybe this does lift all boats, as you say, and I won't entirely disagree with you.

    But the other possiblity is that it leaves depressed labor markets behind. By the time you've gone through your cheap markets, if things are badly enough depressed, you've got a cheap labor market back where you started.

    A key part of the problem is the pay given in the cheap labor market. Are you cultivating a future market, or are you out for maximum short-term profits?

    We'll see whether or not it's catastrophic for the US, because it's not done happening. Where this becomes a self-destructive cycle is if Company A's foreign workers are not on a path to afford their products, and the loss of jobs in the US means that we're off the path of affording their products, either. That hasn't happened on a big scale yet, but things are still moving.

    IMHO, capitalism can't be left alone, it needs a framework of Law. Without that framework, capitalism will devolve as Marx predicted. With the framework, I agree that it can be stable.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  126. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by dpilot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hurrah!

    Let's hear it for the hardline moderates.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  127. as long as we have things like minimal working ... by dpilot · · Score: 1

    As long as you make those stipulations, I agree with you. My point was when those stipulationa are not met. It depends on your attitude as you move your labor overseas, and how tough their government is at negotiating.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  128. 1. sellers will have to sell things for cheaper pr by dpilot · · Score: 1

    This is called "deflation", and every time Alan Greenspan goes to Capitol Hill, he warns about it.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  129. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by aminorex · · Score: 1

    > people will leave the US for cheaper places to live

    Easier said than done. Every country in the world is
    clamping down on immigration. The goal is to
    insure that everyone lives in such a state of
    crushing poverty that they can't rebel against the
    small cabal of the superwealthy. That way, when
    the population has to be thinned, they can't defend
    themselves against the Zyklon-B.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  130. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by rmezzari · · Score: 0

    Dunno... We keep bitching here about how bad is government intervention. We should not keep creating laws just because we feel threatened. If I have no choice about who i hire or where this pernos is located, then there are more chances that me or any other person will engage in creating/expanding a company. What is better, a few jobs in the us and another few overseas or no jobs at all in both countries?

    --
    "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds !"
  131. Re:gentle dig at the American religion of capitali by dpilot · · Score: 1

    Isn't government intervention just like capitalism or just about anything else in life?

    There's a proper amount that's necessary. Too little and you suffer, too much and you suffer.

    One hard part is figuring out how much is just right.
    Another hard part is getting others to sign on to your concept of 'just right.'
    Plus I'm sure that there are more hard parts, life is full of them.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.