Slashdot Mirror


Michael Robertson Unveils SIPphone

JimCricket writes "After almost a year of preparation, the person behind MP3.com and Lindows has unveiled his latest venture: SIPphone. According to a CNET article, the new company sells VoIP-based telephones. I wonder what kind of latency you get with these devices." Interestingly, the CNET article reveals the telephones "...can only call other phones that use the same technology."

236 comments

  1. VoIP by PogiTalonX · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does voice over IP mean that it uses packets of data via IP and then convert it back to voice? Kinda like a shoutcast server?

    1. Re:VoIP by aug24 · · Score: 1
      Without intending to be rude, two seconds on google will give you the answer. No-one here, including me, will answer such a basic question!

      As mentioned earlier today, /. is one of the few places where someone will use the FAA acronym in a post without explanation, but feel the need to elaborate on 'Newfoundland' for clarity!

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:VoIP by insomniak1 · · Score: 1

      I always am amused (and at the same time somewhat disgusted) by this kind of elitist reply that seems to plague Slashdot.

      Of course, I understand that we're all busy people with our own busy things to do so people don't have time to make some sort of constructive response. Then one gets to thinking: "If everyone's too busy or important to reply, why do they have time to write a reply that isn't constructive and actually seems to be more of a drag on the 'community' as a whole?"

      Not too busy to take the time to point out how superiorior and resourceful they are to the 'n00bs', I guess. :\

      People will go out of their ways to berate a perfectly logical question instead of answer 'yes' or 'no' (Which would be a simple reply to the first part of his question.)

      Anyhow, I'd best stop for now. I've had my 2 bits and I'm not interested in starting a flame war. (I'm a really 'busy' person too! hehe Also, I'm beginning to think that I'm beginning to look like I'm getting a little hypocritical myself.)

      [Last ditch attempt to be constructive]

      Here's a link to help kick-start a new 'net you!'

      http://www.albion.com/netiquette/corerules.html hehe ^^
    3. Re:VoIP by insomniak1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's basically correct at its most rudimentary level. The difference is that Voice over IP (VoIP) calls are typically full-duplex now a days. This means that you can talk [send] and listen [recieve] at the same time like on a normal phone.

      Before, back in the old my old 'BBSing with my 14.4 dial-up' days VoIP calls were very basic with very poor call quality. (They were also half-duplex much like talking on a walkie-talkie - you talk, then stop sending so they can reply.)

      Anyhow, VoIP has definately moved along and large telco carriers are using it in their infrastructures to squeeze more value out of their existing network connectivity. My understanding is that if you're using Telus as you phone provider, chances are that at some point (especially if long distance) your call actually passes through some VoIP call legs.)

    4. Re:VoIP by jo42 · · Score: 1

      > VoIP

      A stupid idea, out of the dot com days, where some genius thought that it would be a good idea to comingle voice and data on the same set of wires (aka 'network') to save money. Of course, TCP/IP was never designed for this in the first place, so various hacks had to be added - such a QoS. And, of course, this all depended on all of the hardware and software bits between here and there supporting the various extensions and hacks for all of this to work. The hardware vendors love it, since it requires you to throw all of your old stuff out and replace it with new kit, or, at least, to buy expensive kit to add functionality to 'legacy' hardware. And then you find out that you have to build a seperate data network to handle your voice (over IP) traffic so that it doesn't interfere with your real data network.

      So much for saving money...

    5. Re:VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, I'm using a Creative VoIP Blaster which was cheap, to talk to my family overseas and it works great, without interferring with my real data network (cable). The compression is pretty good, it works well even on dialup, and the quality is also pretty good.

    6. Re:VoIP by aug24 · · Score: 1
      If everyone's too busy or important to reply, why do they have time to write a reply that isn't constructive

      Give someone the answer to a simple question, they'll ask every time.

      Point them to google and they won't.

      It was intended to be polite and helpful, while very mildly scolding, as I thought the parent's author simply hadn't bothered to do anything to help him/herself.

      YMMV <shrug>

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    7. Re:VoIP by warkrime · · Score: 0
      the FAA acronym

      Federal Aviation Administration?

    8. Re:VoIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you dolt! Fags Anonymous of America, made up mostly of Newfoundland's population.

    9. Re:VoIP by warkrime · · Score: 0

      Isn't Newfoundland part of Canada?

  2. If it can only call similar phones... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...then it's doomed already.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:If it can only call similar phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what they said about Lindows, and you know what...

      Yeah, they're both doomed.

    2. Re:If it can only call similar phones... by pg133 · · Score: 3, Informative

      From their web page, it looks as if you can call any other SIP phone:

      Finally, you will want to call and talk to a live person. There are already thousands of numbers you can call. If you know a SIP number of a friend, you can dial it now or look up numbers on the SIPphone white pages. SIPphone lets you call users on other popular SIP services like FWD and Iptel as well. All SIPphone numbers will begin with 747 (it's optional to dial the first three numbers).

    3. Re:If it can only call similar phones... by arvindn · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. If your product won't interoperate, and you're the first in your market segment, then you've got a big lead. But at the same time, you leave yourself open to a bigger player (who can survive longer) undercutting you with lower (possibly anticompetitive) pricing.

    4. Re:If it can only call similar phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You're right -- if it can only call similar phones, it's doomed. That's exactly the kind of truism comment I'd expect from here -- have you ever actually used VoIP?

      Here's why this might be reasonably successful:

      1. What they are selling is a Directory Service + Grandstream phones which support the SIP protocol -- which is *the* standard for VoIP signalling -- oh, which is also supported by the Cisco ATA 186, Cisco 7960, MS IM, X-Lite, Asterisk, etc. -- i.e. basically anyone playing in the VoIP space who doesn't have a legacy H323 or proprietary protocol already deployed.
      2. They've already got an interconnect agreement with FWD which has circa 40,000 users signed up. (albeit not fee paying)
      3. The phones aren't locked to being used for this particular service -- nothing to stop you taking the phones and pointing them at FWD/your own Gatekeeper etc. (Refer: Michael Roberton's comments)

      They've also had the smarts to set their SIP phone numbers as a "US area code" (don't know if they've actually been allocated it, who knows) -- no doubt PSTN access is in their plans at some stage like Vonage.

      Doomed? I doubt it. While nothing here is revolutionary, the genius is in offering the total package (phone + directory service) for a one-off fee that even your grandmother could figure out how to use. All they need to add is PSTN access. If you'd like to learn some more about VoIP, I'd suggest FWD is a nice easy learning curve.

    5. Re:If it can only call similar phones... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      That's a maybe but this product isn't the first to market is it?

      There are already lots of VoIP solutions out there, and how does this "me too" product differ from the crowd? What killer features does it have? None that I can see.

      If anything, it has a major, probably fatal, drawback - only working with similar phones.

      OK, so people carrying out long-distance relationships might like it but what about the rest of us? What's in it for Joe Average?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    6. Re:If it can only call similar phones... by sql*kitten · · Score: 1

      ...then it's doomed already.

      SIP users include AT&T, Avaya, Texas Instruments, Worldcom, Alcatel, Nortel and MCI. You know, the biggest telcos and telco equipment manufacturers in the world. SIP is hardly "doomed".

    7. Re:If it can only call similar phones... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Although SIP is commonplace their own website suggests that this particular phone won't work with other VoIP solutions. If that's true, then this project is destined to fail.

      Imagine that you started up a mobile phone company right now, once the market is already well populated with providers, but that your users could only call other users on the same network. How long do you think it would be before you folded?

      Even if this phone does work with other SIP/VoIP products what is there to differentiate it from the crowd? Nothing that I can see, so please enlighten me.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    8. Re:If it can only call similar phones... by hughk · · Score: 1
      My son is in Germany and his girlfriend has moved back to the states for studying. My son has broadband, and his girlfriend has through the university dorms where she will stay.

      Even using cheap carriers, the phones pay for themselves after just 43 hrs of calls (not a lot for two teenagers in love). IM and Email are free, but its not the same thing as voice.

      SIP has many problems as a standard (they want to stretch to IM too) - but it seems to work in the basic case. Selling two phones together is good idea because compatibility is ensured.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    9. Re:If it can only call similar phones... by swordboy · · Score: 1

      ...then it's doomed already.

      But it is based on a standard protocol.

      What happens when someone creates a SIP client for my PCS-Vision-has-its-own-IP-address phone? What happens when someone creates a SIP bridge for my POTS system at home?

      The governments are screaming about the lost tax revenue already...

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  3. can only call similar phones by mirko · · Score: 1

    So, is there some monopoly going on here ?

    OK, this was humorous but I keep thinking that if his model is good, it will either replace the existing phone infrastructure, thus forcing all the phone operators to enhance the Internet or it will be counter-attacked by less efficient devices (remember VHS / Betamax ?).

    Now, I'd suggest this guy to patent it otherwise he'll get into troubles (MS-Phone ?).

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  4. Oh dear... by DarkDust · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, the CNET article reveals the telephones "...can only call other phones that use the same technology."

    Can you say "bankrupt" and "insolvency" ?

    1. Re:Oh dear... by ottawanker · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, the CNET article reveals the telephones "...can only call other phones that use the same technology."

      It's also listed on the webpage (well, it should be pretty obvious to most that read the page). It seems like JimCricket didn't browse the page too much.

      Anyways, I agree, it's pretty useless. In Canada, deregulation of local phone service was supposed to happen already, and we were supposed to have options of multiple companies. This hasn't happened yet as far as I have heard. Some company needs to come out with a card that I can plug into my computer (like say a quicknet PhoneJack card or something) and service that allows me to plug in a phone line and enjoy all the features of a normal land line, including a number that all users can dial. I'd get that, just because I refuse to get service from Bell, since they've screwed me over a few times.

    2. Re:Oh dear... by benjamindees · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Can you say Open Standard?

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:Oh dear... by NETHED · · Score: 1

      Check this out then.

      Vonage Very Nifty

      --
      --sig fault--
    4. Re:Oh dear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think Vonage is offered in Canada, but I live in Toronto and I have my line with Sprint Canada. I think you could also get a line from AT&T. You should call Sprint Canada or AT&T if you don't want a line from Bell, cause I think deregulation already happened, at least in Toronto.

  5. What kind of service is that? by unclethursday · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "...can only call other phones that use the same technology."

    I nkow some cell phone companies have offers when calling within their network (no use of minutes, extra minutes, etc.), but not being able to call out of the network at all?

    As someone said, the thing is dead already.

    The only thing I can think of that it might work well for is buisnesses. Think of something like a Nextel walkie-talkie cellular service, but without the 'fear' of employees calling other people.

    Other than possibly that, however, this thing will never sell.

    Thursdae
    600 minutes/month, free nights/weekends, and free long distance on my cel plan... and I can call anyone I want.

    1. Re:What kind of service is that? by aug24 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I nkow some cell phone companies have offers when calling within their network (no use of minutes, extra minutes, etc.), but not being able to call out of the network at all?

      As someone said, the thing is dead already.

      If you'll forgive the ad hominem comment, it astonishes me that you haven't learnt anything from all the tech that we obsess about so enjoyably here on /.

      Remember SMS messaging? Oh, you're prolly a yank, maybe you don't use it. Well, it was your network only at first, then it was inter-network, now you can send SMS messages to and from the net via a bridge.

      If these phones are useful enough for international companies who need dedicated calling tech, then it'll sell. After that, how long do you think it'll be before someone implements a bridge for this to the other phone networks? OK, it may not be cheap, but this is how technology develops.

      This could prove to be the first step to VOIP for everything, or it could be Betamax, but it's far too soon to tell.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:What kind of service is that? by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      I know some cell phone companies have offers when calling within their network (no use of minutes, extra minutes, etc.), but not being able to call out of the network at all?

      As someone said, the thing is dead already.


      I disagree. The same could be said of FAX machines when they first came out. But, suddenly, there were several different manufacturers that made compatible FAX machines. Then you could get a FAX-MODEM for your PC. Fed-Ex even tried to offer FAX as a service.

      Shirky has a great writing about the revolutionary nature of IP telephony. I think this phone is exactly the kind of thing that is needed to kick-start the process. If a few other manufacturers make compatible phones, and someone figures out how to emulate a SIPphone on a PC, the market is wide open. And the new telephone network is built out from the edges. Not as a service, but as a product.

      FWIW, I'm in the telecom carrier business; we've been anticipating something like this for a while now..

    3. Re:What kind of service is that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Betamax/cam is alive and well, thank you.

      If you forgive his ad hominem comment, I will forgive yours =) FM888

  6. American area code for an international system? by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After reading the how it works page, it looks like all these phones will use the US/Canadian area code 747. While this jumbo number is easy to remember, I'm asking myself if it would have been wiser to use a new country code instead. Imagine asian people exchanging their phone number, and one of the two has a number starting with +1747... it just doesn't sound right...

    1. Re:American area code for an international system? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      If these phones can only communicate with one another, it won't matter what you do - area code or country code - both parties will have the same exact number format.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    2. Re:American area code for an international system? by wytcld · · Score: 0

      Plus, many Chinese avoid phone numbers with "4" in them, believing that number to be associated with death.

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    3. Re:American area code for an international system? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      That just goes to show the complete artificiality of area and country codes, and the associated 'long-distance' rates. Why are Canada and the United States the same country code, yet calling in-between typically costs more? It's quite arbitrary, at least in North America, so I think that this fits with that general trend.

      But remember, this is separate from your traditional phone network anyways, so they wouldn't even need to follow the standard American phone number format. It just makes adoption easier for their primary market.

  7. Must we support Michael Robertson?? by jkrise · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lindows is good advertisement for Linux, but for all wrong reasons - root login, anti-virus etc.. Secondly, Lindows has subsidised the SCO vultures. Despite all the hype about XBox cracking, no one but Microsoft has benefitted from the hack.

    It's tough supporting someone who paid SCO.

    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Must we support Michael Robertson?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Lindows commissioned Caldera, not SCO, almost two years ago for some development work. Which they never managed to do. So big deal, who knew they would suddenly go insane?

  8. Internetwork gateways? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even if you could only call people using phones with the same technology locally, surely a solution could be devised to call other networks, as we do with areacodes and whatnot already?

    The question rather becomens, does it make sense to do so?

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Internetwork gateways? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Yes, that solution is called Packet8, Vonage, or iConnectHere.

    2. Re:Internetwork gateways? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without biasing, I work on http://net.com/products/voice_packet/ which is highly capable at such things, and can also convert to older protocols such as ISDN or even CAS. So there are options out there for migrating from just about anything to VoIP.

  9. Nice marketing by gmania · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's amazing ... just buy some phones (http://www.grandstream.com/), add a directory services, get way too much press coverage and you're in business. Michael who? And don't even get me started on the whole sip/h323 issue.

    1. Re:Nice marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At US$ 75,00 per unit, they seem more expensive then the SIP phones announced here. Anyway, at this price levels, I think VOIP may catch.

      Most old VOIP services were trying to make a profit of the comunication minutes, a la Net2Phone. But really, all we need is a phone like device that uses the free Internet to call and is simple to use.

      These phones are the way to go...

  10. I like it by bazik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I already read about that a few hours ago on a German newspage and am currently waiting for SIPPhone's sales dep. to answer my questions :)

    As you get 2 phones for $129 its not that big problem that you can only call other SIPPhones with that... I might buy a pair and give one phone to my girlfriend as she lives over 200km away from me and a priceless phone connection to her would lower my bill alot ;)

    If anyone is curious about the quality, there is some info about that on their homepage saying:

    SIP calls typically have very high audio quality. Call quality is much better than cell phones and may even be better than land line phones you're used to - especially over long distances and between countries. SIP uses the latest compression techniques which allow calls to sound their best.

    Sounds ok for me :)

    --


    --
    One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
    1. Re:I like it by billimad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your standard analog land line uses a stream of 64kbps (ulaw/alaw compression) but this is related to the quality of the audio not the latency of the network it goes over. The telecom network traditionally allocates a complete end-to-end circuit for your call - wasteful but guarantees QoS.

      I definitely think this [VoIP] is the way to go. This is an preview of the future and as such will have limitations.

    2. Re:I like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might buy a pair and give one phone to my girlfriend

      So as a special offer they might even bundle the phone with a girlfriend...

    3. Re:I like it by WARM3CH · · Score: 1

      But if you two already have got a broadband connection (seems SIPPhone needs an ethernet connection), then why in the world you need to pay for such thing to just do some type of voice-chat with your girlfriend? Get yahoo messengar (or ICQ or anything else) for free and you can even use your webcam :)

    4. Re:I like it by bazik · · Score: 1

      Easy,

      1) I dont want to be all the time at my PC while talking with her, 2) Those IM you mentioned wont run on my Linux box :P

      --


      --
      One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
    5. Re:I like it by WARM3CH · · Score: 1

      1) get a headset. it's even easier than holding the handset. yet, if you really insist there are handsets available in many places that can be connected to a soundcard 2) Use ICQ. It features directory, voice, messaging. It's free and available on any platform. Yet, I don't understand why you want to pay for someting that is already free....

    6. Re:I like it by bazik · · Score: 1

      Any platform? Show me the native Linux client supporting all that features :P

      BTW, I use CenterICQ.

      And I havent seen a really decent, wireless headset with good headphones for less than $129 yet... show me one :)

      --


      --
      One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
    7. Re:I like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SIPphone is not wireless. Something comparable would be this which is a USB handset. And it's a shame that according to you, Linux has no voice-chat program yet ;)

    8. Re:I like it by WARM3CH · · Score: 1

      Why do you want to compare a wireless solution to a wired SIPphone? Yet, yes, you can get a good bluetooth headsets AND a USB bluetooth dongle for less than $129. About ICQ, I'm sorry. I thought that the Java version supports voice. Yet, you know better than me about the freely available voice-chat programs in Linux.

    9. Re:I like it by TwistedGreen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although this looks like a nice implementation, if you both have broadband connections already, why is this such a big deal? You can communicate with VoIP already. It's not like there's any shortage of software for that, and all you'd need is a cheap mic instead of a fancy $65 handset. And you can also add video, if you both had cameras. None of this is particularly new technology or anything.

    10. Re:I like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lemme guess...

      You're the same guy that wonders why people don't just setup their own PVR with their computer instead of buying a TiVo.

      Here are a few reasons why you'd buy this device instead of setting up VoIP software and a mic on your PC:

      - Doesn't require a PC to use. Just plug it into your broadband connection.

      - You can receive calls at the same number if you bring your phone with you and plug it into a new broadband connection. (Bring it with you on vacation, plug it in, bingo, you still can get all your VoIP calls.

      - No configuration necessary, just plug this thing into your broadband connection, and you're ready to make and receive calls. THIS IS A BIG DEAL. I can send one of these to my grandma or other computer newbie, and I don't have to explain how to set up VoIP!

      - Works like a real phone. When someone calls you, it rings, just like a real phone. You can even call 411 and 1-800 numbers on it.

    11. Re:I like it by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      Oh really? My bad. I thought that a computer was required. RTFA, I know, I know.

    12. Re:I like it by apankrat · · Score: 1

      Think average Joe, not geekmail crowd. Taking a familiar device (a phone), plugging it into a familiar socket in a familiar fashion, and then operating it in a familiar way without even knowing anything about Internet, VoIP and other cool (but unappealing to regular folks) things. This is extremely viable idea that opens huge consumer market with a simple and clear message -

      no-cost-long-distance-calls

      Sure, technology-wise it's nothing new, but packaging and marketing are novel and I bet we'll see much more devices of this sort surfacing in coming months. It's a NEXT BIG THING.

      --
      3.243F6A8885A308D313
    13. Re:I like it by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      The telecom network traditionally allocates a complete end-to-end circuit for your call - wasteful but guarantees

      That information is only about 5 years out of date.
      Just about every LD carrier is using carrier-class VoIP solutions now. Unless you're calling intra-lata, from POTS line to POTS line, your callis probably going IP somewhere.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    14. Re:I like it by phunhippy · · Score: 1

      That information is only about 5 years out of date.
      Just about every LD carrier is using carrier-class VoIP solutions now. Unless you're calling intra-lata, from POTS line to POTS line, your callis probably going IP somewhere.


      This is actually incorrect. Please stop reading the latest TECH/Industry magazines.

      In Fact only 10% of GLOBAL Telephony minutes are now VOIP and only the long haul stage at that.

      99% of calls originated in the U.S. to other U.S. based destinations still go over traditional TDM networks.

      As for "carrier-class" there are very few solutions that even approach 5 9's of reliability as in TDM networks. The only current way to achieve this is to use private lines for the long haul IP transit and this takes away the advantage of using the public internet.

    15. Re:I like it by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      As for "carrier-class" there are very few solutions that even approach 5 9's of reliability as in TDM networks.

      Which has mostly to do with people like you being responsible for their upkeep.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  11. Monopoly no, doomed yes by FuckMeter · · Score: 0
    So, is there some monopoly going on here ?
    Not monopolistic at all, but it sounds doomed to me, unless Robertson manages to sell a few major corporations on the technology.

    This reminds me a great deal of the Nextel "walkie-talkie" service: extremely innovative and convenient as hell, but only if you're talking to another Nextel user, otherwise it's worthless. The "nationwide walkie-talkie" service that Nextel offers is only compatible with other Nextel users; you can't, for example, "walkie-talkie" to a Verizon cellphone user.

    Two words come to mind when thinking of SIPphone: proprietary, incompatible. Unless it's adopted by a couple of major corps, it's never going to take off.

    --
    Rate Adult Photos (Free Pr0n!)
    1. Re:Monopoly no, doomed yes by mirko · · Score: 1

      Unless it's adopted by a couple of major corps, it's never going to take off.

      So you agree with me that this is a powerful anti-spy communication device ? Especially if you can convince the customers to register (in Europe -and probably elsewhere- you can use a cell phone anonymously using pre-paid cards).

      Because of its really doomed nature, this could turn into a massive success for the bad reasons only (...privacy...blah!...).

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  12. Just another nexus by Jdodge99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FWD is one way for SIP users to interconnect, this could well be another. Grandstream's are cheapie ip phones, but from what I read on asterisk's mailing list - they do work pretty well for the simple stuff. VOIP /will/ happen -- the protocols need to catch up -- with QOS priority usage, nat traversal issues etc. IPV6 would make these things easy, but even without it people will find a way to make things work. Keep in mind -- people may well buy a pair of these as a "free talk" solution on a temporary basis, but then move on to more sophisticated usage. Grab one of these, set up asterisk http://asterisk.org w/ a one port fxo (connects computer to a phone line for incoming/outgoing calls) card - and you instantly gain a lot of flexibility. This WILL happen -- it's only a matter of WHEN it will happen.

  13. Expensive by phalse+phace · · Score: 1

    At $129.99 for a set, that seems pretty expensive to me, especially if they can only be used with phones that are using a similar technology which there probably aren't too many of.

    1. Re:Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you bothered to go to the site, you would realize there're no monthly fees. If you have family in third-world countries, it's a very good price to pay for unlimited calling.

    2. Re:Expensive by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      seems pretty expensive
      That's nowhere near 'expensive'. You can't find *any* other IP phone for less than $200.

      probably aren't too many of.
      There are tens of thousands of SIP phone systems already deployed all over the world with hundreds of thousands of phones.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:Expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not true, you can find these exact phones at grandstream.com for $75 per phone. You are getting a deal with this company (about $20 off) if you buy two probably because they've knocked the margin down buy buying bulk from grandstream. What will be better is when you can get grandstream's HandyTone Analog Telephone Adaptor for $75, and just plug in whatever phone you want.

    4. Re:Expensive by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      > > seems pretty expensive
      > That's nowhere near 'expensive'. You can't find *any* other IP phone for less than $200.


      Well, it is expensive when you compare it to a bog-standard normal phone, which you can get for about 10 pounds.

      (Say, home come you can't use the symbol for pounds sterling in Slashdot comments any more?)

    5. Re:Expensive by Jdodge99 · · Score: 1

      And cell phones cost a lot more than a land line phone as well. This does something different, may I point out again. NO Monthly fees with this service. BTW - to parent: You can get a cisco ata-186 for about $150

  14. No thanks. by Gherald · · Score: 1, Informative

    Everyone with broadband has a PC witha sound card anyway, so may as well just use Teamspeak.

  15. A step in the right direction by fven · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This business model seems very much like the way we as consumers should be heading.

    I am reminded of the failed business plan when faw machines were first commercial (before they were common) FedEx offered a service called ZapMail, whereby they offered 2 hour delivery of documents rather than 1 day. They did this by faxing the documents around FedEx offices.
    Of course people realised that for a small initial investment (buy a fax machine) they could do they same thing themselves, cheaper.

    This seems a small venture at the moment and may be ulitmately unsuccessful due to the limitiation of only being able to call other SIPphones, but it is a step in the right direction and may pave the way for other businesses to operate using a similar model.

    I see uses for not only businesses but for travellers and ex-patriots. It is increasingly easy and cheap too access broadband internet while costs of international phone calls are still high.

    1. Re:A step in the right direction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Buddy, if you're going to refer to Clay Shirky's recent essay at least have the decency to reference someone else's idea.

      In any case, Clay is wrong -- SIP phones *are* like fax machines, although they still need a central directory service (for the moment until PSTN interconnect gets sorted). Hence, the closest analogy to Zapmail in this instance would be an internet cafe offering cheap phone calls where you get to use their SIP phones.

      Hence -- SIP phones ARE like fax machines -- and the providers of directory services are more like the early pioneers of the internet e.g. uu.net. and the returns to the pioneers in the SIP space should be similar.

    2. Re:A step in the right direction by otmar · · Score: 1

      As I see it, SIP services will be very similar to email/POP services: Any decent ISP will give his customers a SIP-login. And just as there is hotmail, gmx, yahoo & co for free email, there is Free World Dialup and iptel for the SIP world.

      The tricky part will be the interconnection of these SIP islands. And here NAPTR records in the ENUM DNS will have the same role as MX records for mail.

  16. Can only call other VoIP phones that use SIP by solidhen · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the FAQ:

    Q: Can I use software or what is called a softphone to make and receive calls with SIPphone?
    A: Although it may work, at this time we cannot offer support for anything but a certified SIP phone.

    Q: Are there other SIP phones I can order besides those offered at SIPphone?
    A: The SIP phones offered at SIPphone are designed to work out of the box with SIPphone with zero or minimal configuration. We also work to offer the most affordable SIP phones available in the world. Many SIP phones cost hundreds of dollars. SIPphone sells 2 phones for just $129.99. It may be possible to use the SIPphone directory with other phones, but no technical support is available at this time to support this.

    Q: I already own a SIP phone and I would like to use your SIPphone directory service. What should I do?
    A: First, you need to sign up with our service at SIPphone Sign Up. These are the settings that you will want to use:

    SIP Server: proxy01.sipphone.com (130.94.123.252)
    STUN Server: stun01.sipphone.com (69.0.208.27)
    NTP Server: ntp01.sipphone.com
    TFTP Server: tftp01.sipphone.com (130.94.123.253)

    Currently the SIPphone directory service has only been tested with the Grandstream BudgeTone 100 phone. Please check back for further updates on "SIPphone friendly" SIP phones.

    --
    Some things are more important than an animated rat
    1. Re:Can only call other VoIP phones that use SIP by kevlar · · Score: 1

      With a Cisco SIP to PSTN gateway, you can call real numbers. Vonage offers a service like this.

    2. Re:Can only call other VoIP phones that use SIP by aminorex · · Score: 1

      With SER or Asterisk on a spare PC,
      you can also do this. It will connect
      to an FXO for home use or a T1 card
      for running a little telco. Get
      your neighbors to make you their telco.
      All it takes is a T1, a cable modem,
      and a few days of education/installation.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  17. Gtreat News by PhysicsExpert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its great to see VoIP finally starting to take off, it has always seemed strange to me that we should live in a world where most people have a highspeed internet connection and yet our phone system still relies on copper wires and lossy a/d converters. If VoIP really takes off then a fully digital system would mean an end to those crackly phone calls and slow connections.

    What might be intereting though is if people set up their own VoIP systems over existing mobiles. Here in Europe we have GRPS which is a high speed circuit switched data system. If somebody could write a SIP client for Symbian then users could run VoIP on the GRPS sytem and cut out the extortianate charges imposed by the telcos.

    --
    All that glitters has a high refractive index.
    1. Re:Gtreat News by BrainInAJar · · Score: 0, Funny

      "a fully digital system would mean an end to those crackly phone calls and slow connections."

      And a replacement of packet loss... no crackling, just sweet silence. sometimes interrupted with a few clicks and pops that are around the same freq. as your friends' voice.

      I have a digital cell (as do most) and if you've got a bad connection (because you live in a downstairs room), then you still can't make heads nor tails of the conversation

    2. Re:Gtreat News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPRS is totally unusable for VoIP. You should realize that average round-trip times for GPRS are about 900ms (in my experience), with a lot of jitter.

      Why do you think GPRS is as dead as it is?

      Now imagine calling somebody else also being connected via GPRS. 1.800ms delay. sure makes for interesting conversations... similar to talking to someone on the moon.

      Regards,
      scotchcho

  18. Uhm ... many VoIP phones can only call VoIP phones by jstockdale · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but they don't fail. First of all, if you want to remove the restriction for a VoIP phone to only call other VoIP phones in and of itself you have to wire and pay for a phone line in parallel to your Ethernet/IP Networking tech thats already in place. This virtually undermines the idea and benifits of VoIP in the first place. Instead, what we do at Stanford in one of the networking buildings is have a Cisco VoIP system installed thats routed in parallel (read same physical networks, different subnet) to the IP system. Anyone that wants to call inter-system or to previously defined VoIP phones can do so for free (speech). This doesn't prevent the same people from calling other locations, but this is accomplished by a on site server connected to the phone system which routes any off site numbers to the standard phone system. This way only a limited number of phone lines are needed for the entire system, the PABX infrastructure that would be the alternative to VoIP isn't needed, and costs are saved on any calls to offsite VoIP phones. I suspect that the VoIP phones we are speaking of could use the same time of system; however, regarding the VoIP phones in and of themselves, only VoIP-VoIP connections can be made

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
  19. Do they work in Europe? by solidhen · · Score: 1

    I live in Stockholm and I would love to give on of these phones to my sister in San Diego.

    I'm sure the Ethernet part will work in Europe but what about the power adapter?

    --
    Some things are more important than an animated rat
    1. Re:Do they work in Europe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: Will the AC power adaptor that comes with the SIP phone work in countries other than the U.S.? A: Yes, the power adapter that comes with the phone comes with a universal switching power adaptor. You will only need to purchase a socket adaptor for the appropriate country.

  20. Hate to chime in as a Microsofty but... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    Netmeeting with a headset on a laptop with 802.11b is the shiznit for voice over IP.

    Hell, what I'd like to see is a device that LOOKS like a cordless phone, is 802.11b compatible and supports Netmeeting/AIM voice chat/etc... If enough people got those and wireless access points, POTS might soon go the way of the dodo.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:Hate to chime in as a Microsofty but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a thought but what would connect all of the WAPs? Broadband over POTS, while behind in the US, is still ahead of cable-based broadband in large parts of the world.

      I think the comment about the death of POTS is a bit premature...

    2. Re:Hate to chime in as a Microsofty but... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Here you go.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:Hate to chime in as a Microsofty but... by doogles · · Score: 1

      Even sexier 802.11b IP Phone from Cisco, although the original poster said he wanted AIM/Yahoo Chat supported, too, which neither Symbol, Cisco, or Spectralink do at this time.

    4. Re:Hate to chime in as a Microsofty but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but it doesn't (yet) support SIP, so the $$$'s required for the proprietary Cisco signalling protocol would be well outside the range of the average Slashdotter for their home kit. :-)

    5. Re:Hate to chime in as a Microsofty but... by doogles · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it doesn't (yet) support SIP, so the $$$'s required for the proprietary Cisco signalling protocol would be well outside the range of the average Slashdotter for their home kit. :-)

      Sounds like the average Slashdotter needs a raise.

      Regardless, you can control SCCP phones with IOS Telephony Services (ITS), recently renamed CallManager Express. This software is on everything from the Cisco 1751 on up, in the IP/Plus or IP/Voice featureset or better.

      This includes the CP-7920, as well as the more traditional CP-7960/CP-7940s, etc. My CP-7920 ships August 22nd.

  21. Support your local Telco monopoly instead. by solidhen · · Score: 1, Funny

    that will show that fucker Robertson. Who does he think he is anyway?

    --
    Some things are more important than an animated rat
  22. SIP Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    SIP is an IETF standard for voip, surely he just meant it could only phone other SIP phones! no need for any conspiracy theories! SIP is an open standard, and you can even get linux software linphone to use it... Just need a gateway to the traditional phone system and yer sorted.

    1. Re:SIP Phones by galdidos · · Score: 1

      A gateway or a translator. Vocal from Vovida http://www.vovida.org has all that and its free. Also for people with deep pockets there's Cisco's SIP proxy but AFAIK that's 5 figures we're talking about.

    2. Re:SIP Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Furthermore, SIP is in development with 3GPP which partners with the following consortium of telecommunications companies: "The Partnership Project is not a legal entity but is a collaborative activity between the preceding recognized Standards Development Organizations.

      They are interested in using SIP for 3rd generation wireless technologies.

    3. Re:SIP Phones by jmv · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. It all depends on the actual codec used. If they use G.711, GSM-FR or Speex (and follow the RTP payload draft/RFC), everything's fine. However, if they use a proprietary codec, other VoIP apps will likely not work. Of course, it would be nice to see linphone interoperate with these devices.

  23. just another by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is just another thinly veiled attempt at giving my mother yet more bloody methods to call me up and find out why she has no bloody grandkids yet.

    I dispare i really do..

    --
    Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  24. FREE BLAH FOR ALL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    17:01 7/8/2546

    phone calls are acctually free already.

    well IF you have a bluetooth capable cell phone, broadband(ADSL->IP->VoIP) and a bluetooth capable
    computer (if not get one of those bluetooth in a USB-device plug-ins).

    too bad now one knows how to programm the stupid bluetooth cell-phones.

    the lamn customer-care(sic)(evil)
    acctually told me that one cannot tunnel voice thru bluetooth. they are black-listed now.
    while i was reading their reply to my question "tunneling voice thru Bluetooth" i was also browsing their company web-page reading the specs to their bluetooth wireless hands-free set.

    i was just wondering then, how come the headset
    uses bluetooth to transmit voice thru Bluetooth
    to and from the mobile phone?

    soo talk about conspiracy.

    must be cool to work for a cell-network-operator.
    install a fat antenna (base-station). fire up your oracle-databse server. connect to main headquarter. sync with main database. sit back and enjoy while cashing in on utterly rreeddunddaanntt phone calls ... oh
    and do not forget to open a cool can of beer.

    VoIP (Voice over IP(InternetProtocol)) for the demented:

    cell-phone talks to bluetooth-device in computer.
    computer talks to network-card. network-card talks
    to internet. internet talks to your friends computer. your friends computer talks to its bluetooth device. this bluetooth device talks to your friends bluetooth enabled cell-phone.
    you're talking to eachother for free!

    you see it's a conspiracy.
    what's missing? a smart programmer from
    the open-source community...

    #:|

    1. Re:FREE BLAH FOR ALL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm going to be tied to the immediate vicinity of my computer, I'll just use a wired solution like one of those Quicknet cards and a two line phone. Line 1 is my normal POTS service and line 2 is my phone card, with ohphone waiting for me to go off-hook.

      Why bother with all the bluetooth mess just to use a handset that really wants to be a cell phone? Let it be a cell phone and use a normal phone that's wired into your computer.

      A word of warning: if you buy something from Quicknet, don't just use a throwaway account at your domain. Use a throwaway zone inside the domain! A week after you order the stuff, the mail starts coming and it doesn't let up. 5xx bounces have no effect. Even dropping their lame asses in the bit bucket didn't do anything, as they changed net blocks this past week and started hitting the 5xx errors again.

      So, create something@quicknet.your.domain, then drop the MX for that subdomain once you get the order done. Either that, or set it to something interesting like a host that resolves to 127.0.0.1.

  25. User has to have internet. So, what is it for? by SillyCON · · Score: 1

    User has to have internet, even a spare RJ plug. So it can use SpeakFreely or Netmeeting or whatever for free. The recipient has to have the same configuration, too. The main diference is that the SIPPhone is an independent device and rings on incoming calls, for only 129$. I cannot see the meaning of these all.

  26. Microsoft Sidewinder Voice - $30 by Azethoth666 · · Score: 1

    Oh, and it has been available for a few years now, and it is certainly not the only solution. There are free versions that need only the crappy microphone that shipped with your computer or sound card anyway. Er, they do require broadband and a computer though.

    1. Re:Microsoft Sidewinder Voice - $30 by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      And there probably is a free version for GNU/Linux or BSD ..... so you don't even need Windoze.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    2. Re:Microsoft Sidewinder Voice - $30 by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      Good observation. But what about my grandma? She doesn't have a computer.

      This is a consumer appliance. Its not a fully functional PC, and it doesn't require it. I read the install instructions: unpackage, plug in and wait for the light to stop flashing. My grandma can do that!!

      Its all about the target audience. They make several references to the fact that it may be able to communicate outside the network, but you're on your own trying to get that to work. If its easy enough to do, us technically savvy ones can do that and ship BOTH phones to our friends. Besides, who here buys MS products anyway?!?

      The only thing I see as missing is a bridge that would allow you to use your existing phone. How about a "SIPswitch" box with four connections: power, broadband, telco, and phone. You pick up the phone and dial normally, you place a normal call as you would today. You pick up and press #, the box switches you from telco to SIPphone, perhaps giving you a different dialtone.

      (Are you guys listening out there? Here's a profit opportunity..)

    3. Re:Microsoft Sidewinder Voice - $30 by WARM3CH · · Score: 1

      Just out of cuirsity: how comes that your grandma has an active broadband connection at home but no computer?

    4. Re:Microsoft Sidewinder Voice - $30 by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

      For her SIPphone, of course!

  27. latency? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Informative

    "I wonder what kind of latency you get with these.."

    I would assume the same latency you would have with any application that would have taken the same network path as the 'net phone's packets?

    Perhaps you are talking about an audio delay? In that case, assuming your ISP has proper routing, there should be no significant delay (around the same as many cell phones) when speaking to someone else in your same country.

    I've set up vbrick devices to use two T1's bridged for LAAtlanta conferences and the delay was barely noticable.

    Not since dialup on a 28.8k modem have I noticed much problem with audio communications on the web. Definitely better than the telco's international service back in the 80's. I remember talking to friends in Germany and Japan and having to stop for long periods of time between sentences to prevent cross talk.

    I think this product is so-so, though. Without a subscription based access from the voip phone to a telco bridge and a real phone number, it's not going to explode in popularity regardless of it's audio quality.

  28. SIP is the way to go by Mickut · · Score: 5, Informative

    SIP is not limited to just VoIP, as the name says it is Session Initiation Protocol. There already is a reasonable GNU SIP library, so let's make that better, and then we can create an open source SIP capable VoIP-phone that could interoperate with this system as well as others.

    Other uses for SIP that could/should happen IMO are (starting a session of) multi-player games and messaging, conferencing software for sharing pictures, etc.

    Since SIP is basically just a handshake protocol, doing all those things shouldn't be impossible. Wanna play a game of chess or go with a pal? Just initiate a SIP connection, if their end supports your game and they are available, you've got a connection. No more application specific ports to configure to get a multiuser application work.

    1. Re:SIP is the way to go by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

      wonder what ? there are already several opensource sip phones/proxies/pbxs (supporting hardware for sound encoding too)
      just google for it

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
  29. Existing... by daaku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Making international call's is pretty expensive, especially in developing contries. In India, we get a device which goes between the phone cable and the phone. You press # twice (on your regular phone), it calls your ISP, goes online, checks your account balance and rings. All in about 2 mins. And then you can use your existing phone and call from anywhere to the USA for about 1.9 cents a minute. Hell, even within the US 1.9 cents a minute is pretty good.

    Oh yeah, they've got a ethernet version too. No need to wait for the 2 odd minutes. And the connection is crystal clear. The callee never realizes how 'cheap' the caller is!

    1. Re:Existing... by endeitzslash · · Score: 1

      Can you elaborate on this? My wife has cousins in India and this hardware/service would be a great gift for them. They already have internet connectivity (just a dial-up). What else would they need? Is there a website where I can check this out?

  30. It's SIP service, silly by Trinition · · Score: 5, Informative

    As the name implies and the article explains, the phone uses SIP, or Session Initiation Protocol. I did some research on SIP last year and found it to be somewhat intruiging.

    SIP is basically used for setting up the endpoints of a human communication channel over an IP-based network. It negotiates what kinds of communcations are supported on each end, and what protocols to use. So if a video-SIP-phone calls a regular analog phone via a SIP-PSTN proxy, the proxy would only support audio certain codecs. The calling video-SIP-phone and the proxy would negotiate to use only audio using a matching protocol and the cal would go through.

    And since SIP is a protocol just like SMTP or HTTP, it is very controllable. There are dozens of SIP products popping up from SIP servers to SIP proxies... and now SIP phones. For example, you can have a SIP proxy/server be concious of where a user is logged in and re-route SIP calls to their present location. As a Java programmer, I'm looking forward to the day when I find a reason to write a SIP Servlet.

    Furthermore, the latest version of Messenger in Windows XP supports SIP. I would think that this means a SIPPhone could call someone using Microsoft's Messenger on Windows XP. However, I was not able to confirm this with a breif perusal of the SIPPhone site, and they also state this only works with other SIPPhones. That may be an over-generalization to keep people from thinking it works with regular phones, or maybe they did something crazy with it.

    I'm crossing my fingers that it is a generic SIP endpoint that can contact any SIP-enabled device.

    1. Re:It's SIP service, silly by caluml · · Score: 1
      The one thing that we (in Linux world) need is an IPTables module for handling SIP packets. There used to be an H323 module, but SIP is fast becoming the standard for VoIP. insmod ipt_SIP.o anyone?

      Then Linux firewalls can be used in companies, rather than application layer proxies (yuk).

    2. Re:It's SIP service, silly by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

      I would think that this means a SIPPhone could call someone using Microsoft's Messenger on Windows XP. However, I was not able to confirm this with a breif perusal of the SIPPhone site, and they also state this only works with other SIPPhones.

      Check out the product spec from the manufacturer.
      The SIPPhone page states the make and model.

      Interoperable with various 3rd party SIP end user device, Proxy/Registrar/Server, and gateway products (e.g., MS Messenger, Cisco IP phone and gateway, etc)

      Support popular vocoders including G.723.1 (5.3K/6.3K), G.729A/B, G.711 (a-law and u-law), G.726, G.728, and wide-band G.722 (Model 102D). Dynamic negotiation of codec and voice payload length


      G.711 is the granddaddy of the voice codecs. It doesn't say it uses H.323, but I'm guessing it does, seeing as it interoperates with cisco and msn messenger voip.

      You can probably even use a different directory service than SIPPhone.com's ; the phone has a web interface for configuring it.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    3. Re:It's SIP service, silly by HereTheDogIsBuried · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should prefer to setup a SIP proxy on the gateway rather than implementing a SIP ALG module.

      SIP (as any VoIP protocol) is a complicated protocol with many options and many modes of operations.

      Parsing it is somewhat ugly especially if you do it in kernel code where any small mistake will kill the gateway completely (as opposed to killing the SIP proxy only).

    4. Re:It's SIP service, silly by wfberg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oops! SIP is of course a replacement for H.323.
      a comparison of the two.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    5. Re:It's SIP service, silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be "a H323 module", surely. Reasoning: H is pronounced "haitch" {which starts with a consonant and thus uses "a" rather than "an"} when it's the first letter. It's only "'aitch" if it comes after something else ..... HTML is haitch tee em el, but PHP is pee 'aitch pee.

      Disclaimer: I come from Derby and have no accent.

    6. Re:It's SIP service, silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H.323 is the older version of the VoIP call control protocol. It is also the most widely supported (see it in Microsoft's Netmeeting for example). SIP is the new alternative to H.323

      -ahoy

    7. Re:It's SIP service, silly by noah_fense · · Score: 2, Informative


      SIP=the new H.323

      Anything running SIP won't use H.323. THey are "competing" protocols. Cisco VoIP supports SIP, but they have yet to produce a SIp server, i beleive. Any IP phone on the market should support SIP, or it will have a much shorter lifespan. SIP/H.323 sets up/takes down the call, applies your billing. The actual voice stream is RTP (real time protocol). If RTP packets are dropped or arrive out of order, they won't appear in your phone conversation. Usally this results in 10-20 ms of silence, which sounds like static.

      Unfrotunately, the standard changes every three months, so until we finally get a SIP standard that has enoguh features for everyone, we won't see a huge market saturation of SIP products.

      Also, your latency and jitter will affect your all around voice quality. This will not be improved unless you have carriers giving the RTP stream (the voice stream) QOS accross their backbone.

      Bottom line: VoIP won't be trusted until your carrier supports it accross their backbone, or you manage/own the backbone. Fortunately, qwest, time warner telcom, global crossing, and many others are moving in this direction.

      -n

    8. Re:It's SIP service, silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the phone has a web interface for configuring it.

      Words that should send a chill down the back of anyone who has ever gotten stuck being their office's unofficial tech support staff.

      The phone has a web interface.

      Dark days ahead.

    9. Re:It's SIP service, silly by caluml · · Score: 1

      A H323? You can't say that, you heathen!
      One is actually supposed to say "an hotel" too, don't you know?

    10. Re:It's SIP service, silly by caluml · · Score: 1

      I don't know... I'd rather some nice tried and tested kernel module, as opposed to some companies get-a-proxy-out-the-door-and-make-some-money-quick proxy.
      I hear what you're saying about it being complicated - but the ftp connection tracking module works fine, doesn't it, and that uses separate ports for control and data.
      Why would SIP be much different to that?

    11. Re:It's SIP service, silly by VirtualUK · · Score: 1

      "It doesn't say it uses H.323"

      urm....nope, the Budgetone100 is a SIP only phone. Both SIP and H.323 share common supported codecs but that won't in itself allow it to communicate directly with H.323 endpoints. MSN Messenger doesn't use H.323 (are you thinking of NetMeeting?), it uses SIP.

    12. Re:It's SIP service, silly by MonsterMasher · · Score: 1

      I followed the phone spec sheet to www.grandstream.com web site, thinking there is a chance that I could finally pick up some VOIP hardware at a decent price if I ordered directly.

      These guys must be business newbees - very little sales info, for example - they do indicate quantity requirements for purchase (or any pricing)!

      I tried calling and of course these are busy, so I sent them an email. Since they are no dout been side-effect slashdotted, my guess is the only way I will get my answer is if these guys do what they should have and put some actual sales information on there web site.

      Here I am, credit card in hand, ready to pick up 3 or 4 if the price is anything slightly better then the Lindows guys price. Hell, I'd rather purchase the adapters for the $70 they mention in the beta news clip.

      How can a business be so stupid.. makes me wonder. Listen up guys - add some sales info, and if your not selling for Quanities less then 100 - put that on there and save yourself 99% of the sudden slashdotting.

    13. Re:It's SIP service, silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with most VoIP protocols (SIP included) is that the data port is dynamically allocated; with FTP the ports are well-known, fixed ports. Normally the signaling port (which is used for call setup, the phase of a phone call in which a connection is negotiated between the end-points) is a fixed port number, but each new phone call typically burns up 2-4 dynamic ports. Would you really want to open permanent holes in your firewall to support any more than just a handful of users?

      The best idea that I've seen to solve this problem is to dynamically "pinhole" the data ports; temporarily open up the required ports on the firewall during call setup and close them again during call teardown and leave the call signaling port open all the time (I can't remember what SIP uses, and I think H.323 uses 1720 for endpoint-to-endpoint connections, 1719 for endpoint-gatekeeper connections, but I'm not sure). Most firewalls, of course, do not support this, and the only one I know of that did was made by Aravox, a now-defunct VoIP-enabled firewall manufacturer whose IP has been acquired by one of the big multi-national equipment vendors.

      It'd be nice to see this idea find its way into an open source solution, but it's pretty tricky to get right and someone would need some serious free time on their hands. If the implementation came complete with a nice API (in the language of your choice), it could easy run as a daemon outside kernel space.

  31. This is Doomed. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Creative tried it. with he VoIP blaster. While being fantastic devices and I snapped up as many as I could to use not with creative's services but with fobbit so I could use them without relying on their servers for routing and connecting.

    Most people were not interesed in it because it was semi-difficult to use and made you think you needed to buy their service, which you didn't.

    I use VoIP all the time. My GF lives 100KM away so that makes it cheaper IF both ends have DSL or CABLE modem. VoIP completely sucks over a dial up.... which over 60% of internet users still have as their only way of getting online.

    I wish him luck, but there is cheaper and better hardware out there already (The VoIP blaster is still sold under the origional manufacturer's brand) that is cheaper and much more flexible.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:This is Doomed. by haakon · · Score: 1

      What is the OEM brand?

    2. Re:This is Doomed. by ajs318 · · Score: 1
      My GF lives 100KM away
      Dude, that's only an hour's drive! Why not get a contract mobile with inclusive minutes ..... if the called party is on the same network, or a landline, such calls are usually free off-peak. But you do have to sign a contract, which you don't with a regular one.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:This is Doomed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people were not interesed in [VoIP Blaster] because it was semi-difficult to use and made you think you needed to buy their service, which you didn't.

      and

      there is cheaper and better hardware out there already (The VoIP blaster is still sold under the origional manufacturer's brand) that is cheaper and much more flexible.

      This guy solved the problems you listed for VoIP Blaster. And there are no cheaper VoIP *phones* out there now, so this isn't doomed at all. I also don't see how you consider VoIP Blaster to be "more flexible." Are you speaking in terms of the plastic they used to make it? Because how could a device that is plugged into your computer more flexible than a device that does not require a computer at all? A device that works just like a regular phone. One that uses an open standard (SIP) and is compatible with other SIP-based phones and software?

    4. Re:This is Doomed. by llefler · · Score: 1

      The VOIP Blaster was a piece of crap, like most of the rest of the stuff they sell. (Video Blaster PVR anyone?) A. it requires a computer, B. it requires a headset or regular phone, C. the volume adjustment was inadequate. I bought two. One is stuck to the side of my desk (unused) and I gave the other one away. And yes, I know about fobbit.

      I had been looking at the Grandstream phones, but never found anyone willing to sell them without requiring a monthly service.

      What VOIP needs is free directory service (like this one) and individual phones in the $50-75 range. I'll probably end up buying a pair of these. I would definately buy one if I could get it for $65.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  32. i SWEAR i had this exact same idea a few weeks ago by nervlord1 · · Score: 1

    But unfortuntatly other than telling my girlfriend about the idea I did not capitilize on it. Still the idea is not that novel and I am sure there are many that also came up with similar Ideas. the trick is working out how to allow the phone to make calls to REGULAR phones for basically a penny. Something like dialing an internet node which is in the location of the person you are dialing, and having the internet node connect to that person and pass the call back to you.
    Ofcourse this has many privacy implications but works basically something like this:
    ( represents internet connection : - : standard telephone line)
    You Internet node located in Area of your call recepient : - : Your call recepient

    Would this work? Thoughts?

    --
    Microsoft IIS is to webserving as KFC is to healthy eating
  33. How long before... by TheCrunch · · Score: 1
    "SIPphone offers a directory with thousands of numbers which you can call anytime, worldwide, at no cost."

    How long before we start getting automated commercial calls? The hardware cost to set something like that up is minimal and there are no call charges.

    Or even worse, how long before someone writes a script to retrieve the numbers from the directory and call them all at random intervals?

    --
    My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
  34. Where's a picture? by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a picture of the device SOMEWHERE on their website be a good idea? An artists impression at least!

    Can it really look so bad that they want to hide it?

    Are they re-using the plastics from 80's Garfield the cat novelty phones or maybe it's a Billy Bass add-on?

    1. Re:Where's a picture? by Zemran · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like a picture to me :-

      http://www.sipphone.com/tiki-index.php?page=Orde r% 20Now

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    2. Re:Where's a picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean this?

      Apparently you didn't go here...

  35. Re:i SWEAR i had this exact same idea a few weeks by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    Sure, that works. Go to Open H.323 for an overview. What you want is called a gateway.

    Of course, the real innovation would be to create a Gnutella-like network of people interested in maintaining a local phone line to donate to such a cause. That's an idea I had a couple of years ago. I decided it would be limited to businesses, because the person would pretty much have to have a *spare* phone line. Also, the system would probably attract a lot of leeches, so making sure that each node contributes would be a problem.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  36. Cisco has them by Bruha · · Score: 2, Informative

    Our company have several Cisco VoIP phones deployed in various departments. We even have the ability for them to interface with the PTSN through special hardware attached to a 5ESS switch.

    The only thing that prevents us from doing any massive rollouts is the utter fact that price per user and the nature of data networks make the phones more subject to unusability due to network problems than a normal phone.. This is not latency issues were more worried about something like a OSPF/Firewall or something along those lines wiping out a whole department's ability to communicate.

    1. Re:Cisco has them by ScreamingSlave · · Score: 1

      We use several Cisco and Pingtel SIP phones at work and the general opinion is that the Pintel phones rock while the Cisco ones stink.

    2. Re:Cisco has them by ScreamingSlave · · Score: 1

      Pingtel that is, not Pintel....oops.

  37. What about the Free World Dialup service? by pmsr · · Score: 1
    Two sip phones at $129.99? That is a bargain. Add the Free World Dialup service and you are set.

    /Pedro

  38. Re:i SWEAR i had this exact same idea a few weeks by caluml · · Score: 1

    -
    Microsoft IIS is to webserving as KFC is to healthy eating

    But I like KFC....

  39. But who has the directory? by wfberg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can pick up SIP phones, and even nice H323 videoconferencing hardware cheap these days from Taiwanese OEMs. Companies like vonage.com or pilmo.nl will even hook them up to the plain old telephone system for you.

    The main problem is that each company that sells these things to end users uses it's own LDAP directory. So you can call other people who use the same brand easily by tapping a 'phone number' that's the same regardless of their everchanging IP number, but don't expect to call your buddy who's using netmeeting so easily. Also, if you place a call from one VOIP telco to another, chances are it will travel some distance over PSTN and will be billed in stead of free, despite the fact it could have been an end-to-end-over-IP connection which is usually free of charge.

    Of course SIP can work over the real dns just beautifully (using SRV records), but do these phones support entering alphanumeric user/hostnames? And will hotmail support SIP? (Answer, yes it will, and it will tie in with MSN video/voiceconferencing and Microsoft SIP phones...)

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:But who has the directory? by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself.. Too bad you can't edit your own posts.. But then again, the goatse guy might crop up a lot! ;-)

      Free World Dialup is already running a directory that voip services can hook up to for free. For example "Dial 1010333number to reach iConnectHere subscribers" and "Dial **478number to reach any iptel subscriber."

      Not as good as using DNS (you could just dial number@iptel.com if that were implemented correctly) or a global standard so that voip services would just have their own LD/country code for example (though the PSTN telco's are actually moving toward SIP rather than the other way around - using enum.)

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    2. Re:But who has the directory? by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      I have read that you can call a vonage user with @sip.vonage.com

      Haven't tested this, and I have no idea how to initiate calls in the other direction.

    3. Re:But who has the directory? by otmar · · Score: 1
      So you can call other people who use the same brand easily by tapping a 'phone number' that's the same regardless of their everchanging IP number, but don't expect to call your buddy who's using netmeeting so easily. Also, if you place a call from one VOIP telco to another, chances are it will travel some distance over PSTN and will be billed in stead of free, despite the fact it could have been an end-to-end-over-IP connection which is usually free of charge.

      There is a solution for that problem: it's called ENUM and that way you can link all there SIP communities together using the DNS. You just need to overlay the E.164 numbering scheme over all these number-based SIP communities, install the proper NAPTR records, get ENUM support into the SIP servers (well, we got that put into iptel's ser and into Asterisk already) and you're set.

      It's just like interconnecting host-based email systems via common addressing (RFC822) and a global directory for domains (MX records in the DNS).

      Been there, done that, gave a demo at the last IETF meeting. See this presentation for details.

      /ol

    4. Re:But who has the directory? by wfberg · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right! I forgot about enum. Enum rules! ;-) (Only the NAPTR records look funky with all of that regexp action going on.. not for lay persons..)
      Who's in charge of handing out +87810 numbers btw? And do any PSTN carriers interconnect to +87810 yet?

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    5. Re:But who has the directory? by otmar · · Score: 1
      Who's in charge of handing out +87810 numbers btw?

      As far as I know Telcordia. ENUM is done by Infonova. We're prodding iptel, FWD and earthlink to get blocks in some suitable +878 space.

      /ol (+878105363564228)

    6. Re:But who has the directory? by wfberg · · Score: 1

      Who's in charge of handing out +87810 numbers btw?

      As far as I know Telcordia. ENUM is done by Infonova. We're prodding iptel, FWD and earthlink to get blocks in some suitable +878 space.


      Found it; according to enum.info RIPE is in charge of the technical stuff, and ITU-TSB is officially in charge of delegation.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  40. Not a problem by Dexter77 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "...can only call other phones that use the same technology."

    The article seem to have forgotten to mention that (almost) all 3G mobile phones have native SIP support. It means that in near future all mobile phones, atleast in Europe can call via SIP.

    Since Microsoft Netmeeting has SIP support, and Linux has its own SIP stacks, you might be expecting a SIP boom soon.

    SIP is probably the future of IP calling. It has some very nice features in it that make it work well with other messaging applications like "InstantMessaging". I'd say put your money on SIP now.

    1. Re:Not a problem by blastedtokyo · · Score: 1

      Actually Netmeeting uses H.323, but Windows Messenger has SIP support.

    2. Re:Not a problem by VirtualUK · · Score: 1

      "Microsoft Netmeeting has SIP support"

      wrong, NetMeeting has H.323 support, a different VoIP standard, Microsoft's new Messenger is SIP compliant.

  41. Why VoIP? by wackoman2112 · · Score: 1

    Why would you want to convert your voice into packets and send it using IP when you can just broadcast your voice into the air? Imagine if you were in an area with poor reception. You speak into the phone and... wait 60 seconds... the other person hears you.

    And you can only call people with compatible phones!? This phone is going down the tube.

    Cool idea, but not practical.

    --
    /usr/bin/complain > /dev/null
    1. Re:Why VoIP? by Flamed+to+a+Crisp · · Score: 1

      Imagine if you were in an area with poor reception. You speak into the phone and... wait 60 seconds... the other person hears you.

      Well, it's not like you'd actually use this phone! This is Slashdot! Bragging rights and geekiness come first!

      --
      It's... News for Nerds! Stuff that Matters! La-de-da-de-da-DE-da!
  42. Wow! by Cally · · Score: 1

    What an innovative idea. If only it hadn't occured to Cisco three years ago...

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    1. Re:Wow! by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      $60 vs. $600 makes a difference.

  43. What kind of student has DSL but no phone? by dBLiSS · · Score: 0

    The article says he sees students phoning home for money, but if the student has DSL wouldn't he already have a phone line?

    --

    The Good Life
  44. I'd like to see *direct* comms. by rdmiller3 · · Score: 1
    I'd like to see phones that have enough smarts built in to try establishing a direct connection with the other phone instead of always going through the phone company's tower.

    Can these phones talk directly to each other without going through a WEP?

    If not, why not?

    1. Re:I'd like to see *direct* comms. by almaw · · Score: 1

      Yes, they can, as it happens.
      The only thing this company is selling is a directory service, just like DNS, or a standard paper telephone directory. You then make a direct call, much like receiving data from a web server.

      You can buy the actual phones seperately from Grand Stream.

    2. Re:I'd like to see *direct* comms. by rdmiller3 · · Score: 1
      No, no, no... you missed it.

      Two phones in the same building would still need the WEP and an IP protocol router (if it's not in the WEP) to address each other by IP address.

      Here's what you missed:

      Both phones can "hear" each others' radio signals... so why don't they just talk directly with each other via radio instead of going through the WEP/router combo?

      This is what got me about those nifty cell phones with the walkie-talkie-like group communication function... Even though they weren't paying for a "call", the phones were still sending everything through the nearest tower. These new VoIP phones have just replaced the tower with a WEP.

      But with digital networking technology, it's not necessary. If the phones are within reasonable radio range of each other, they could communicate directly via radio rather than loading the tower/WEP at all.

      This VoIP phone gets close by not requiring a centralized server to pass the data... but all the data still has to go through the WEP/router when talking to the phone in the next room. That shouldn't be necessary.

      What would really be cool is if phones would PARTICIPATE in the Internet Protocol as routers instead of just soaking off it as leaf nodes.

    3. Re:I'd like to see *direct* comms. by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      What's a WEP? These phones aren't wireless; they use Ethernet.

      Most SIP phones allow you to dial an IP address directly; it just isn't very convenient.

      What would really be cool is if phones would PARTICIPATE in the Internet Protocol as routers instead of just soaking off it as leaf nodes.

      Uh, no. That makes the phones more expensive and makes their performance less predictable.

  45. ADSL Router with VOIP by James+Durie · · Score: 2, Informative
    This is an ADSL Router with VOIP facility. You just plug an ordinary phone into it.

    The dialling is a bit complicated but you can set up common numbers in the router.

    It also has the problem of only being able to phone other VOIP systems but for the home worker connecting to the office (that has a VOIP exchange) it would be ideal.

    Zero cost phone calls to colleagues.

  46. morons re-unbale pateNTdead eyecon0meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who are you going to call on after the big flash?

    back on task.

    fatal aggression towards innocents/infants must cease immediately.

    as previously noted, we're going to let y'all take care of that. won't your mommies be proud.

    nothing you can do you say? we beg you to reconsider.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creator. get more oxygen on yOUR brains. vote with yOUR wallet. that's the spirit.

    your intentions/behaviours (see above) will disempower the greed/fear based murderers.

    don't waste time, we're in crisis mode.

    the Godless blight of the evile georgewellian fuddites is dissolving into coolapps/the abyss at the speed of right.

    good work so far. there's still much to be done. pay attention. that's affordable.

  47. SIPphone, SIP and Free World Dialup... by jeffpulver · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you would like to give SIP a try just try out the latested X-Lite/FWD Client available
    here.

    Please read the FWD Quick Start Guide to you get familar with our community.

    Once you have a Free World Dialup account, you can dial your friends who have a SIPphone account, by dialing **747 followed by the SIPphone number. You can also dial people on other SIP networks.

    FWD now also supports the ability to place
    "toll-free" calls into the US, UK and the Netherlands. more Details are availalbe: here.

    At the moment there are approx. 44,000 FWD subscribers in 150+ countries.

  48. Well, I dislike my IP phone by k0de · · Score: 1

    Call quality is much better than cell phones and may even be better than land line phones you're used to

    Our company has its headquarters in North Carolina and the development office is based out of Newfoundland, Canada. To lower costs, we have incorporated IP phones. My desk has an Axxess IP phone.

    I'm not fond of these phones at all. They have a monstrous number of features, which is great, but general phone use is left wanting. The caller always sounds distant, and the lag makes phone conversations more difficult, especially with conference calls. Calling someone across the room for example will reveal a disconcerting 1/2 second or so lag between what you hear across the room and what you hear on the phone.

    I'm not ready to hail the praises of IP phones just yet.

    --
    I'm wrong and so are you.
    1. Re:Well, I dislike my IP phone by javatips · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been using Cisco IP phone for the past 2 years. Never had any problem with voice quality or lag. At one time we tested another IP Phone from some other company (don't remember which one). The phone was so bad that you had to wait 1 or 2 second when awsering the phone before talking because there was a delay for the microphone to be activated. The sound quality was also very bad.

      Looks like the premium you pay for a Cisco phone is worth it (they are still overpriced IMHO).

    2. Re:Well, I dislike my IP phone by netringer · · Score: 1
      I'm not fond of these phones at all... The caller always sounds distant, and the lag makes phone conversations more difficult, especially with conference calls. Calling someone across the room for example will reveal a disconcerting 1/2 second or so lag between what you hear across the room and what you hear on the phone.
      Have you ever tried calling a buddy's mobile phone right next to you? Same thing. I guess the the A-D-D-A conversion and traversing the cell tower backbone introduces latency.

      I arranged a meetup recently where one buddy called my cell phone and said he was right there. I looked around the small crowd and said, "Raise your hand so I can see you." He was standing only 30 feet away. We couldnt tell we were talking to each other due to the lag.

      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  49. A better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My girlfriend leaves for Rome in two weeks and i have been searching for a VoIP solution. This is by far the best solution Ive found. Anybody know of any similar products I should consider?

    1. Re:A better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hey, girl!

      SIP me!

  50. RTP Plea To The Community by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SIP stands for session initiation protocol. It is only used to create the connection. Most people don't even hear about me, I'm the RTP protocol. SIP just make the connection, without me these SIP phones would be useless. I am there for suggesting the name RTP/SIP for all future references to SIP phones. Let's not let another "Linux" happen again. Give credit where credit is due.

  51. Privacy by mrwonka · · Score: 1

    I don't see any information on the website about privacy. If one SIPphone can only talk to another SIPphone I wonder why they didn't throw in some type of encryption.

    Make way for the carnivore of VoIP.

    1. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother? Just use a VPN between the two phones, and leave this company out of it.

  52. Re:What's the next version?? by stu_coates · · Score: 1
    SUCKPhone

    At last a phone for men... the women have had it so good for far too long! ;-)

  53. SIP isn't new at all - neither are SIP phones by potcrackpot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I thought slashdot was supposed to be full of people who knew what they were on about? More than half of this thread is rubbish! "Doomed, we're all Doomed!"

    Saying that SIP is dead is like saying that, ooh, UDP will never take off.

    It's been around for ages, and it's not just used for phones; it's a generic session establishing protocol.

    Essentially, you want to set up some kind of media session between two endpoints; what you do is you send a SIP INVITE message through proxies etc. and attach another kind of protocol message (such as SDP) which describes the requirements for the session. The endpoint receives this, and establishes the session directly (without the proxies etc. in the loop). In very short.

    It's just another protocol, like DAP.

    SIP phones have been around for ages too - Pingtel's offering is probably the best one.

    That said, I don't see SIP phones as taking off in the home, or for personal use; they're much more suited to being used in small enterprises etc.; much lower cost than a PBX. You'd have to have some kind of PSTN interface with the outside world - perhaps phone companies will start providing softswitch capabilities so that people can make their VoIP network speak to the outside world?

    What you CAN do at the moment is have a mixed network - VoIP which talks via a router (Cisco 2600 for example) which then talks to the PBX which talks to the PSTN in the usual fashion.

  54. VoIP and POTS bridges by swb · · Score: 1

    Does anyone sell an unencumbered VoIPPOTS bridge for 1-3 analog lines? I guess I'm thinking of a box with an ethernet jack, line jacks, and extension jacks. POTS extensions go in the extension jacks, POTS lines go into the line jacks, and ethernet into the ethernet jack. Device allows POTS extensions to make POTS or VoIP calls, terminates VoIP calls on extensions or bridges them to the POTS network, or allow POTS network originated phones to make VoIP calls.

    I could see that being very useful as a starter device; it'd let you use your normal home phone lines and phones as usual, over IP, terminate VoIP calls to your regular phone. More interestingly is the ability to roam to any IP network with a soft phone and make POTS calls.

    I think Vonage's device is like this, but it's encumbered; you can't just get the device can you?

    The magic with VoIP seems to me to be in having a way to bridge to the POTS world.

    1. Re:VoIP and POTS bridges by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Vonage uses the Cisco ATA. If you want one "unencumbered", call Cisco and order it. Similar boxes are made by 8x8 and D-Link.

  55. how about we trade? by No-op · · Score: 1

    I'd take your mom asking about kids over my mom supporting gay rights for everyone and ignoring her straight children.

    if we swap, you won't ever have to worry about a mom who wants grandchildren. let's talk.

    --
    EOM
  56. FWD is a better way to go by blastedtokyo · · Score: 1
    You can buy the sipphone devices, then configure them for FWD (fwd.pulver.com). With FWD you get the ability to call regular landline/cell phone numbers over IConnectHere, the ability to call toll free numbers in the US, the ability to call a FWD number from a regular phone (see libretel.com) and an existing use base of 43,000.

    And yes, FWD is free.

  57. Service vs. hardware by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    It appears that SIPphone is a new service of some sort - As there's nothing new about the Grandstream BudgeTone phones except for the price (They used to be $80-90 each last I checked, Robertson is selling two for $129.99.

    The hardware WILL work with other SIP services - I believe the BudgeTone is popular as a SIP client for use with the Asterisk open-source PBX software. In an Asterisk setup, you can use the phone as a normal PBX extension phone.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  58. Ordering doesn't work by internet-redstar · · Score: 1

    I tried to order one, but the shop simply doesn't work :(

  59. Gateway by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that the Asterisk open-source PBX includes SIP gateway support.

    And the phones that Robertson is selling are already tested and known to work with Asterisk. (These phones aren't new, although $130/pair is - They were $80-90+ per single unit last time I checked.)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Gateway by jpiterak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but don't forget that there are still issues using SIP across NAT gateways/firewalls.

      On the plus side, even though the Grandstream phones have had some flakiness issues, Grandstream has been very responsive, releasing firmware updates regularly.

      They also seem to be committed to working with open source projects like Asterisk, perhaps even supporting Asterisk's IAX protocol - a replacement for SIP that DOES work (and work well) behind/across a NAT firewall.

      In any case, anyone interested in this stuff really should mosy over to Asterisk's website (asterisk.org). A lot of progress is being made putting together a very powerful open-source PBX system.

    2. Re:Gateway by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but don't forget that there are still issues using SIP across NAT gateways/firewalls.

      I'sure you mean "VoIP", not SIP. SIP was created to fix those problems, and, for the most part, has.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    3. Re:Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ingate Systems (www.ingate.com) sells SIP-aware firewalls that can handle NAT. They even sell something called a SIP-arator, that can be placed next to a non-SIP-aware old firewall and handle all the SIP traffic.

      As far as I know, they are the only firewall vendor that can do this.

  60. SIP to SIP Only? Of Course Not! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    "...can only call other phones that use the same technology."

    Not quite accurate; SIP phones can call POTS lines and vice versa assuming whomever is running the SIP gateway has a land line.

    My buddy's company, Vail Systems runs a completely SIP based network at this point. They are definately making calls to people using standard telephones.

  61. Too little too late by macemoneta · · Score: 1
    If this came out before the cellular boom, then it might have had a chance. Cellular has become the lifeblood of business. The company I worked for even put cellular repeaters in the building to insure a good signal. Many of the local retail businesses, and especially malls, have done the same.

    Most cellular companies now either offer affordable unlimited calling plans, or unlimited calling between cell phones on the same service. You are no longer tied to your desk, and for many, that means they no longer have a desk, once you add 802.11a/b/g to the mix.

    People are cancelling their land lines at a significant rate. This is just another landline. The paradym has changed; the phone number is no longer associated with a fixed location, but rather a mobile person.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    1. Re:Too little too late by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Now it's my turn to say, "You don't get it". Who says it's a landline? It just has to be an IP network. Seems like any of the 802.11 a/b/g should be acceptable candidates. There's no compelling reason it needs to be at any specific location. The one great distinction from cell phones is paying ridiculous charges so that an over managed network has the resources to track and charge you for all those minutes. When the first 802.11 based SIP phone is marketed with Bluetooth, built in SIP phone directory and scheduler that is synchronized with a click like a T68i is currently with iSync, then you can start numbering the days of the cell phone dinosaurs.

      This isn't exactly a new prediction. John Chambers has been saying that rationally there is no reason why anyone should be paying the sums they are currently charged just for voice calls. SIP is the enabling protocol to make the transition of voice telephony from a service to an application. Regulators might throw in a wrench to slow the stampede but forces of nature always prevail eventually. Cell phones are the fax machines of the first decade of the 21 century (however notice that there are still fax machines today so there will still be cell phones tomorrow).

    2. Re:Too little too late by macemoneta · · Score: 1

      I agree absolutely! When handheld, mobile, IP phones based on 802.11/a/b/g are available with a nationwide infrastructure, they will have the potential to replace cell phones.

      This SIP phone isn't a candidate for that environment, unfortunately. All it is, is another thethered phone. As such, it's competing for the rapidly decreasing revenue from traditional landline telephones.

      If they had made it into a cell phone-like 802.11 unit, I would have been in the cheering section.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  62. It is compatible with FWD and Iptel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check their page, the phone is compatible with those services...

  63. Vonage is better, and SIP based. by kevlar · · Score: 1

    Vonage has a service where they give you a router to plug a regular phone into. The router is then plugged into your cablemodem/dsl/whatever and voila, you have a VoIP SIP based phone. They also provide you with a phone number (in just about any area code) and give you great rates on long distance. No need for a Pingtel or SIPhone.

    1. Re:Vonage is better, and SIP based. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Of course, the advantage that this has over vonage is that it will work without paying a monthly fee. They are probably getting ready to offer a gateway service to regular phones, as it doesn't sound like they are making much just by selling the SIPphones.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Vonage is better, and SIP based. by kevlar · · Score: 1

      Yes, BUT once they do that, they'll charge a monthly fee.

    3. Re:Vonage is better, and SIP based. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Certainly. I wonder if they will still provide free directory services for SIPphone to SIPphone calling once they do that though. If not they are going to be pretty much worthless, as the Vonage setup you talked about is much nicer, easier to add extensions to etc.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Vonage is better, and SIP based. by kevlar · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but SIPPhone apaprently ignores the entire NAT problem. Vonage uses a VPN to create an open network, but SIPPhone would require all users to turn on port-forwarding. Its not an issue for someone who knows what they are doing, but for the mainstream.... it could produce problems.

  64. Opening phone access..... by WareW01f · · Score: 1

    An odd thought, many legal issues, but still interesting: Suppose someone starts a service that is like file sharing, but is actually time sharing a local POTS connection. i.e. For every x minutes that I donate my land line to the cause, I get x minutes on a gateway somewhere else. Not quite like open access points but similar. Of course there are many kinks (restricting long distance calls, people pranking on the system, hacking, etc) but the idea of a non-fixed, free, distributed POTS gateway is somewhat interesting. The best/worst part of IP telephony is that there is always going to have to be a last mile connector. This means revenue. Somehow though, I see the charges for IP2POTS calls ultimately shifting to the person *being called*. i.e. AT&T allows IP phone to be able to call your cell as a service. Evil, yes, but until IPv6 comes out, the billing models in place work that way. Course right now someone could make some dough with little Mom and Pop gateways... So many options!

  65. This is such a joke of an offering... by al701 · · Score: 1

    SIP/VOIP is something I have researched a lot about. Basically, this guy set up a server has a just enough bandwidth to do the directory lookup and is selling the phones. Yippie. Thats it. No VoiceMail or advanced Unified Messaging services. He doesn't even have a way to get back to POTS. Here is how it should be done. Like Vonage but make it free from device to device over SIP, then minimal cost back to POTS. Then we want advanced services like TellMe. Oh and use the Cisco ATA 186. Like Vonage, because the thing supports 2 lines and ANY phone.

    1. Re:This is such a joke of an offering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want Vonage, get Vonage. Some people want something else.

  66. SURE, this will work by not_a_george · · Score: 1

    ALL you need to do is replace everyphone in the world (uhh, $5-$100 dollars US) with and internet connection (still needs standard phone line), a computer, and one of these new handy dandy VoIP phones (conservative total around $600-$900 dollars US)..
    do you have the capital to do that all yourself?

    --
    Linux: Helping nerds look smarter since the late 90s.
  67. 802.11sip by buktotruth · · Score: 1

    The next step is to plug one of these phones into a wifi connection. Now you have a virtual cellphone in any Wifi Location. Do this at an office where you may have a WiFi building and you're golden.

    I'm also pretty sure that IBM has already realeased something like what I have mentioned.

  68. GnomeMeeting by jonita · · Score: 1

    You can already do the same with GnomeMeeting and the ILS server or any gatekeeper. That's just using H.323. Moreover it works with any H.323 hardware or software, with Asterisk PBX, but also with any PC-To-Phone gateway...

  69. WiFi Sip Phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So how about a WiFi sip phone to really cause some problems with the cell phone business, I can see it now,free mobile phone service! maybe advertiser supported,hey i could stand 60 seconds of ads for an unlimited free call! bye bye cell phones!

    1. Re:WiFi Sip Phones? by jeffpulver · · Score: 1

      I will be introducing WiFi SIP phones branded for use with Free World DIalup in september at
      Fall 2003 VON
      via the pulverInnovations brand.

  70. Wrong, wrong, wrong.... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

    You can call other SIP users, from the SIPphone website:

    "SIPphone lets you call users on other popular SIP services like FWD and Iptel as well".

    Also, these are regular BudgeTone model 101s from what I can tell...they're not made by SIPphone, there's no "technology" involved on their part, they're just selling someone elses hardware under their 'brand'.

    -psy

  71. voIP using a regular phone and a modem by snooo53 · · Score: 1

    A couple weeks ago I remember reading something on here about how the poster gets free phone service through their cable modem by plugging a regular phone in their modem jack and using some sort of proprietary(?) software to operate the thing.

    Does anyone else have any more info about this? I would love to know more (especially about free or cheap alternatives for those of us who can't get phone service through our cable) but I can't seem to find the original comment...

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
  72. Re:Too little too late? not here for cellphones! by Festering+Leper · · Score: 1

    Maybe in your country. Here cellphones are more expensive than ever. Digital cellphones were supposed to be better digital quality, cheaper because there were no contracts, billed by the second, and the phones had better battery life. for a while they were. Now all but one company is back to billing by the minute for digital calls. 2 & 3 year contracts are the norm again. you might be able to find a plan with a lot of minutes but there's no such thing as unlimited for anything

    Quality is down the toilet for digital. It has really dropped, and on top of that rates are higher than analog used to be, no service or feature offered comes in an unlimited form now unless you're an old customer who's paying the rates dictated by a 2+yr old contract.

    I can find half a dozen better deals for long distance calling on landlines than the 10cents/minute the cell companies claim is a deal.

    Oh yes, all those people who switch to cell-only and drop their landline? .. haven't you noticed they all stop using the phone quickly? the phone's always off because the owners have discovered that if you actually rely on these crap things you'll have to replace your $120 lithium battery every 8 months.

    What a deal! NOT!

    --
    if you want people to think you know what you are talking about, just put ".com" at the end of everything you say.com
  73. Did anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...can only call other phones that use the same technology."

    Two tin cans and a piece of string :)

  74. sip phones aren't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SIP phones have been around for a while, and they have only been able to call other SIP phones, that is nothing new or interesting... its how VoIP works. If you want to call a PSTN phone, you can through a SIP phone if you have a gateway on one end that has an actual phone line plugged into it to dial out over the PSTN network. slashduh

  75. Think BIGGER! by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

    Now add Wifi support, and you can have free mobile phone services!

    After that, add a hundred geeks per city who buy a 500 wifi-station, and you have a mobile phone which works for free and has usefull coverage in the city you live! All you need the telco's for then is as ISP's, nothing more.

    Think of the money saved and the change in the way we think of communication...

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  76. This isn't new, whats new is the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a good price for SIP phones (I've seen the same model for sale for $75/phone, which is $150 for two). You can use these phones for any SIP stuff, I would recommend that people check out free world dialup which has been doing this exact same thing for a long time, and has been doing it as a community service, instead of as a company. This isn't anything new, but it is good that it is getting press... the more people who have SIP phones, and use something like FWD, the less I have to pay in long distance charges to those who are stuck with PSTN.

  77. You can call 1-800 numbers, some regular phones+ by snowsam · · Score: 2, Informative
    "...can only call other phones that use the same technology."

    Yes and no. The phone can only call other SIP devices, but there is no reason that the SIP device cannot be a gateway to the PSTN. Mr. Roberton's service includes the ability to call other sip directory networks, including Free World Dial-up.

    Free World Dial-up already has the ability for USA and UK PSTN phones to call a FWD phone number (see the "3rd Party Inbound" section at http://fwd.pulver.com/index.php?section_id=78 ). In addition, the same page explains how to call USA nationwide, UK, and Neatherlands Toll Free numbers from your FWD SIP phone. Since SIPphone can call FWD, they are able to do the same.

    So, maybe this is not so useless afterall... ;-)

  78. How is this different from FWD by TNLNYC · · Score: 1

    Free World Dialup has offered the same service for several years, but for free. Maybe it's just me but it looks like the service is just an extension of that model. Or am I missing something?

    --
    Check out http://www.tnl.net/blog
    1. Re:How is this different from FWD by dberninger · · Score: 1

      Sipphone follows FWD's model closely. It likely represents the first of many similar initiatives. The lack of connectivity with the PSTN does not represent much of an obstacle. Not many people had email only five years ago. Everyone has it today. Same for SIP compliant phones. The PSTN needs connectivity more than the VoIP providers. Check out freeworlddialup.meetup.com for meetup.com organized meetings on this topic.

    2. Re:How is this different from FWD by muchandr · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Internet-wide email took off the way it did exactly because it was so interoperable with all the existing email systems and it became the glue between them. It will be difficult to make FWD as useful as it is in US because the local calls are not free to end users elsewhere. There is some hope though due to all the IP-enabled cellphones...

      What is badly needed is a way to integrate disparate directory services into one. This will probably end up being done on the client rather through interoperation at gatekeeper level (don't you wish ...). For example, I have an ATA 186 configured for FWD. So, I can now call my friends with a similar setup for free, but I can no longer call my grandma in Russia through a commercial VoIP provider's GK...

  79. Remember the FIDOnet? by felis_panthera · · Score: 1

    This takes me back to my early days on BBSs, before most people had heard of this crazy e-mail thing. The thought of sending a message halfway around the world in a couple of seconds was absurd. Enter the FIDO Net. For those of you who don't remember or weren't in the shit, the FIDO net worked similar to FedEx's ZAPMail idea, which leapfrogged faxes between offices until it got to its destination. FIDO capable BBSs would spend a couple of hours every night calling other local BBSs and synchronizing their FIDO mail. While this wasn't nearly as instantaneous as e-mail, it was certainly much faster than snail mail. Once The Web and E-mail caught on, FIDO drifeted into the annals of history.

    I expect the same fate for these SIPhones. They will hit hard and be well used until someone comes up with something better, faster, cheaper, etc. and will then be relegated to the "Hey, you remember *blank* from Back In The Day?" heap. In short, I think they are a great idea whose time has come.

    --

    The chains are broken
    Loki is free
    Ragnarok is at hand...
    1. Re:Remember the FIDOnet? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      ZapMail didn't work like FidoNet at all.

      FidoNet was obsoleted because SMTP email was much faster, but SMTP is now so fast in most cases that it really can't get any faster. So there's no pressure to replace SMTP with something faster.

      VoIP isn't like FidoNet. VoIP is already almost as good as the traditional phone network, so there'll be no need to replace it with something better.

  80. What about telephone SPAM? by eh1001 · · Score: 1

    Free calls are great, until you realize that telemarketers can take advantage of it too. And if it gets a decent share of use, it will be the next spam channel.

    And since VOIP isn't regulated like telephone networks, there's nothing to protect you from it. The US do-not-call list doesn't apply.

    I'm interested in what measures are in place to stop telemarketers from abusing the system.

  81. We use VoIp at work by leeet · · Score: 1

    I can't see a difference. No lag or anything. We use cisco phones and they are pretty neat (sorry about the plug)..

    I can't wait to have one at home. The only problem is the gateway between VoIP and "normal" phones.

    --
    -- Leeeter than leet
  82. Just buy a headset for 30 bucks and use MS IM by melted · · Score: 1

    On ebay you can get headset for even less than that. That's what I use to call home (tiny town in Southern Russia with slow dial-up connections). It works really well and saves me and my wife at least $20 every month (and that's if we used Net2Phone instead). We've been using this for half a year already ($120 in savings).

  83. Re:Uhm ... many VoIP phones can only call VoIP pho by dalzell · · Score: 1

    You don't necessarily have to pay for the line yourself. You can connect through a service like Packet8 or Vonage that has the PSTN gateways which will route the calls into PSTN for you. So, you can get a cable modem, then use Packet8 to make calls anywhere in the world using SIP/VoIP. No PSTN connection is required in your house at all. It also works great and lets you have multiple phone numbers from practically any area codes! And you can plug the DTA into any broadband connection and keep all of your phone numbers with you. People I talk to over my VoIP DTA can't tell a difference from my old PSTN line.

  84. I saw this comingq by luekj · · Score: 1

    I knew the lindows man was going to branch out to another silly/lucrative market as soon as he could, as lindows seems to be going nowhere. (see:post.goingdowntheline) He doesn't actually care about what he's doing, he's just trying to make himself the top of a somewhat niche market.

    --
    Many Thanks,

    Luke

  85. Too Little, Too Late... by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1
    Can only call others on the same network? That's the kiss of death since there are already other vendors who allow you to call POTS phones. Example:

    Packet 8: $19.95/mo with unlimited US calling or $5.95/mo with 8cents/min

    Voice Pulse : $34.99/mo unlimited, $7.99/mo with 4cents/min

    Vonage : $39.99/mo unlimited, $29.99/mo with 500 long distance minutes.

    The only restriction with the first two of these services right now is the inability to call 911, but they are working on it. Vonage already has the ability to call 911 and it won't be long before the others start offering it too.

  86. Vonage is the way to go for SIP by justMichael · · Score: 1

    If you really want to save some money on your phone bills and you make a lot of long distance calls, I highly recommend looking at Vonage.

    Why would you pay $129.00 for a phone that can only call other SIP phones from when you can go to Vonage and signup, they send you an ATA186 that you plug into your router and ANY phone and you can call anybody you want. I do recommend using a newer phone, old junkers seem to have problems.

    I have had a Vonage account for over a year and the only time I had problems was when I had Adelphia as a provider.

    Latency is fine the only thing that I have seen affect QOS is bad upload speeds.

    Highly recommended, and no I don't get kick backs.

    1. Re:Vonage is the way to go for SIP by Temsi · · Score: 1

      Agreed!

      I've had Vonage for months, and it's great.
      I had to go to Europe 2 months ago for about 10 days. I just took my ATA186 box with me, hooked it up to a broadband connection and connected a regular phone to it, and people could still call me on my local number. I could make local US calls even though I was 6000 miles away.

      I've decided to get another box for my family in Europe. So for a low, flat monthly fee, we can talk as much as we want.

      It sounds great, works great and latency is fine.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
  87. Asterick Opensource PBX supports SIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a look here
    http://www.asterisk.org/

    This is a GPL'd PBX system that supports SIP and
    many others types of VOIP and standard analog
    lines, T1/E1 lines and so on. Using asterisk you
    could connect any number of SIP phones to any number of analog lines or T1 lines.

    These SIP phone and asterick would make a nice
    small bussiness system for say 100 employees
    Or a VERY nice home system.

  88. The sweetest setup for voip by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
    I have a great mobile setup for voip: I run voip software on my zaurus. Then when I'm away from home, I simply connect my zaurus to the internet by using my cellphone as a modem... so I can make voip calls from anywhere!

    <cartmanesque>Kick Ass!</cartmanesque>

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  89. It's not the hardware that will make the $$$... by VirtualUK · · Score: 1

    ...it's the services.

    There's not doubt that what we are witnessing at the moment is the start of the next telecoms revolution, the last bastillion of analog technology - the phone - being brought into the digital age. The embryonic development of the VoIP world has seen the emergence of various protocol such as H.323 and SIP and slowly as the adoption of these tools and technologies the wrinkles in the make up of things to come get ironed out.

    Just as we saw with the dot.com boom, there will only be a handful of real winners in the hardware side of things, where the real meat will be will be in the value added services to come as people start to pick up on this technology. VoIP technology does to telephony what Open Source software did for the Internet, which is that it makes it easily accessible for the little guy to turn something into nothing because unlike before in the traditional telephony world the little guy doesn't need $,$$$,$$$ worth of equipment to get their ideas going.

    I think we're going to see a lot of waste out there initially, think back to the start of the web when it was "cool" to have a web site that had flashing text & MIDI files playing in the background...the same is going to happen at first with VoIP, but over time, the wheat will be separated from the chaff.

  90. VoSP by MarvinBellamy · · Score: 1

    In related news, I released the Voice over Styrofoam-cups Protocol. Unfortunately, at this time customers may only communicate with other VoSP nodes.

  91. Speaking of Michael Robertson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  92. Asterisk anone? by Teknikill · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised that noone mentioned Asterisk yet. Its a soft pbx that handles sip/h323 and even pri/t1. We currently have a 4 port T1 card with a 23 voice channels on 1 T1 with a bunch of Cisco 7960 phones loaded up with SIP firmware. It works great, and we saved a bunch. (I don't work for digium, btw)

    You could possibly install Asterisk and use this sip service as a gateway.

  93. Apple iChat AV uses SIP by repetty · · Score: 1

    I know that I'm not going to spring real news on anyone here when I timidly remind everyone that Apple's iChat AV uses SIP.

    About every other night I do a video chat with my dad, 240 miles away, for free. Until we get sick of each other.

    He has a home router and I have a home router (different brands) and didn't have to do a damn thing to get it working.

    SIP is described by RFC 3261.

    How about this fact:

    H.323 standard is 1,400 pages long.
    SIP standard is 250 pages long.

    Which would your rather code for?

    Yes, H.323 specifies (does) more, but then that's what makes so rigid.

    I say, out with the old and in with the new!

    --Richard

  94. Re: Cisco ata-186 by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    bah! That's just an analog adapter.

    This thing has hold, transfer, forward, and speakerphone; and it can be completely configured to use whatever SIP service you want.

    Businesses should be drooling all over this. I think I'm going to order a couple and add it to a Linux server to make a phone system. Now all I need is a salesman...

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  95. Big Deal by Dan+Guisinger · · Score: 1

    Big Deal.......I've been selling this stuff online for months....much greater variety than their single SIP phone, which happens to be a very budget oriented phone. There are much better phones to chose from in the SIP world. http://voipstore.atacomm.com (Yes, a lil shameless self promotion).

  96. VoIP with regular phone by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

    Japan already has VoIP using a standard phone which can call any other phone. The system is being deployed by DSL providers, and was first introduced by Yahoo! BB Japan. The entire service, including my 12Mbps DSL connection, costs about US $30 a month (up to 24Mbps if you're within a mile of the DSL node.) Calls to the US are 2 cents per minute, and sound just fine. Calls to any other phone within Japan are also cheaper, and calls to another Yahoo! BB subscriber are free (go figure; companies can't resist putting that little hook in.)

    Everything is handled through a standard DSL modem; you just plug your current phone into a jack on the back of the modem. It also has an optional wifi card option to allow you to connect with your laptop. I already have an Airport network, but at this point, it's my bottleneck.

    I could go with 100Mbps fiber for about US $55, but I'd lose the VoIP, and I need it for calling the folks at home in the US. Besides, the internet can't keep up at that point (for most daily applications), so it's just a waste of money for the near future. I'm getting the same sort of transfer speeds I was getting back at my university in the states on an OC3 connection.

    --
    "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  97. Cheap SIP phones are new by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

    Sure, Pingtel phones which each cost as much as a computer have been around for a while, but these phones are finally cheap enough to go mainstream.

  98. Too many SIP-PSTN gateway services already by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

    Let's see, there's already Vonage, Packet8, and iConnectHere. Can Michael Robertson beat them on price?

  99. Michael Robertson's Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Look for stuff someone has already invented.
    2. Steal idea - add moral spin.
    3. Sell.

    He's such a champion of techonology.

  100. Just got mine by stefanb · · Score: 1
    Ordered them right away, to have something to play with. They arrived this morning.

    They basically work as advertised; pick up the receiver, punch in the number and you're connected within a sec or two (considering that the call is routed from Germany to San Diego and back, not too bad). Voice quality is OK.

    It seems SIPphone is just reselling preconfigured units from Grandstream; they have a full manual online, as well as a current firmware image for your phone to boot off. SIPphone apparently did not customize the firmware, or lock any of the settings, so you can do whatever you wish with the phone.

    As I suspected (but the SIPphone FAQ or docs don't mention), the phone has a built-in web-server for configuration purposes, with an easy-to-guess default password; so if you're going to put this phone up on a public IP, make sure you have a decent firewall in front of it.

    The SIPphone directory just works; no frills, but works.

    As my employer has two offices at opposite ends of the country, we're probably going to get a couple more, and look into open source gateway solutions. We've wanted to do that for quite some time, but we couldn't find cheap phone to try this with, so this offering almost perfect for us.