Slashdot Mirror


Top 10 Inventions in Money Technology During the 1900's

scuggums writes "The DaVinci Institute has put together an interesting historic piece to help put the world of money technology into perspective. While I'm glad to see the ATM machine made the list, I had no idea it was invented back in 1939. Other items on the list are barcodes, spreadsheets, and RSA encryption. This looks to be one of the research pieces the Institute's doing for their upcoming Future of Money Summit in October."

344 comments

  1. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "While I'm glad to see the ATM machine made the list"
    wow and automatic teller machine machine, is that used to make ATM's ?

    1. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      An ATM machine is an ATM that prompts you to enter your PIN number.

    2. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Automated Teller Machine, dumbass. If you're gonna be a prick and nit-pick, at least make an effort to be right.

    3. Re:Huh by stoops · · Score: 0, Troll

      okay mr. nitpicker, why don't you tell us what PHP stands for? or GNU for that matter...

    4. Re:Huh by MERVERNATOR · · Score: 1

      I was going to point out the same thing, but thought I should check to see if anyone else did.. sure enough, first message. why people dont see the humor in this observation, I dont know,.. but I bet most of them use "NIC Cards" too.

    5. Re:Huh by Lew+Payne · · Score: 1

      Hey fool... we're in techo-land here. ATM can mean "Asynchronous Transfer Mode." Personally, I'm glad he clarified it via redundancy. No need to guess or read further, even during an alcoholic binge.

    6. Re:Huh by AliciaCS · · Score: 1

      Since ATM stands for Asyncronous Transfer Mode and Automatic Teller Machine is just marketspeak... What is your difficulty?

  2. VisiCalc w/o Apple? by PaybackCS · · Score: 0, Informative

    They mentioned VisiCalc, but not Apple, the only widely available platform it ran on?

    1. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They mentioned VisiCalc, but not Apple, the only widely available platform it ran on?

      They probably didnt mention electricity either.

    2. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they mentioned armored cars, without mentioning roads - the only widely available surface that armored cars ran on.

    3. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by Gherald · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They mentioned VisiCalc, but not Apple, the only widely available platform it ran on?

      Notice they didn't mention the Electric Company, which is what the Electronic Cash Register ran off of.

      This Top 10 list is only concerned with finance-specific innovation, not the underlying technology/framework it runs on.

    4. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The mentioned ATM, but not electricity, the only widely available platform it ran on?

      --
      Proud patriot and republican voter.
    5. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by MoThugz · · Score: 4, Informative
      Mods... have a clue, this is not a Mac-centric article...

      The article states "Electronic Spreadsheet", not specifically VisiCalc.

      But since you want to make this a Mac issue... From the article:

      The market for electronic spreadsheet software was growing rapidly in the early 1980s and VisiCalc stakeholders were slow to respond to the introduction of the IBM PC that used an Intel computer chip. Beginning in September 1983, legal conflicts between VisiCorp and Software Arts distracted the VisiCalc developers, Bricklin and Frankston. During this period, Mitch Kapor developed Lotus and his spreadsheet program quickly became the new industry spreadsheet standard.


      <flamesuit class="on">
      Wow... the Mac was dying since 1980?
      </flamesuit>
    6. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      electricity wasnt invented > 1900.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    7. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by thynk · · Score: 3, Funny

      electricity wasnt invented > 1900

      Umm.... Electricity wasn't invented. Period.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    8. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VisiCalc ran on the TRS-80. They were available at your friendly neighborhood Radio Shack.

    9. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The Macintosh did not exist when VisiCalc was introduced. Lots of people bought Apple II computers just to run VisiCalc.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    10. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      electricity wasnt invented > 1900

      Umm.... Electricity wasn't invented. Period.


      I have the patent for inventing water AND fire

    11. Re:VisiCalc w/o Apple? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      sorry - "discovered, harnessed and used"

      damn, some people on /. are quite picky.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  3. A little tidbit... by Valar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The first international banking system was establish ed by the Knights Templar during the crusades. It used something like a check, so that pilgrims didn't have to carry physical wealth with them along the way. The involvement of the templar in money handling is part of what made them so wealthy, which was part of what made them so feared, which was King Philip eventually rounded up and arrested the leaders of the order. I just think it's kind of interesting that banking has its roots in a militant order...

    1. Re:A little tidbit... by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1

      You read that out of the 'Darklands' manual didn't you?

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:A little tidbit... by 56ker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think that the invention of paper money by the Chinese was more important though. Once you get past small amounts - metal currency just isn't practical. I suppose it's a similar idea behind the banks.

    3. Re:A little tidbit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to thank the others on this thread for beating me to the real answer.

      I was surprised Valar didnt use the Chruch of Scien-to-lo-gy manual to back his claims.
      I would have thought that the mighty evil overlord Xanadu was responsible for this millions of years ago.

      zach

    4. Re:A little tidbit... by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      did the chinese invent paper money? or just paper?

    5. Re:A little tidbit... by zhamurai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, the concept of paper money (made from dried strips of mulberry bark) was first experimented during the 1200s in China during Kubla Khan's reign.

      Some Googled links

      http://www.gold-eagle.com/gold_digest_02/stott02 07 02.html

      http://ias.berkeley.edu/orias/MarcoPolo/papermon ey .html

    6. Re:A little tidbit... by nosfucious · · Score: 1

      I think what your thinking of is fiat money. This is where the instrument is not of the actual value of the money, but an abstract concept.

      Your dollar/yen/pound/euro/rupee/etc bill/coin sure isn't worth the paper it's printed on. It's only because you think other people will trust that it's worth a dollar (or whatever). You could on the other hand, actually carry around coins containing 1, 2, 10, etc dollars (or whatever) worth of your favourite precious metal.

      That does not make paper money a worthless invention however. And I sure can't remember which came when or by who.

      --
      Q:I was listening to a CD in Grip and it sounded horrible! What's up? A:Perhaps you are listening to country music
    7. Re:A little tidbit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Foucault's Pendulum

    8. Re:A little tidbit... by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      You could carry them around, but you had better not barter with them.

  4. Excuse me, but by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what exactly does a "smart card" have to do with money technology?

    Most of the ones I've seen used are as digital tokens to access computers, enter security doors... Apart from the "credit cards" you can charge up at Kinkos (and I would consider those credit cards, not "smart cards") I've never seen one used that had a big impact on money technology.

    Anyone?

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Excuse me, but by s.fontinalis · · Score: 2, Informative

      They've become reasonably popular on college campuses to operate vending machines, laundry and they like. However, they're probably on the list for their future potential more than anything that's been realized yet.

    2. Re:Excuse me, but by rynthetyn · · Score: 5, Informative

      what exactly does a "smart card" have to do with money technology?

      You must be an American--in much of Europe, all of the credit cards are smart cards. When I was in Spain about 3 years ago, I couldn't use my credit card to make pay phone calls because the phones were all equipped with smart card readers and couldn't read my American credit card with only a mag strip.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    3. Re:Excuse me, but by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I don't like that idea... I have a chip like that on my PSU ID and despite being only about a year old it sporadically decides not to work. I wouldn't want to carry around a couple hundred bucks on one.

    4. Re:Excuse me, but by maxume · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They were so popular at the University of Michigan that they stopped using them. The chips always broke, and it was impossible to put cash on the card, because there were not enough machines(not in the busy sense, in the location sense), and on top of all of that, nothing accepted them. Also, the food services set up a more popular system that used the magnetic stripe. I think a big part of the reason the magnetic stripe was more popular is that it was quite a bit easier to scam parents into putting a couple hundred dollars on the stripe than it was to actually get cash that you wanted to lock into the chip. I only used it to buy things from a school run store that only accepted the cash chip...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Excuse me, but by CrazyGringo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't fall into the trap! The CIA is going to introduce those to track your movements! That's why I only use barter. I just traded three roosters and a blind cow for a new hard drive.

    6. Re:Excuse me, but by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      I don't like that idea... I have a chip like that on my PSU ID

      You don't "carry it around" on the smart card. It's just an authentication and basic data storage mechanism. But You wouldn't know anything about that going to an ag school (couldn't resist).

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    7. Re:Excuse me, but by roll_w.it · · Score: 1

      We had these for awhile here, but they didn't seem to fly. If you have a debit card & lose it, no problem, there can be bigger issues with a smart-card. I think the biggest thing was "what's the point?" - We have a pretty strong atm & debit-card system, we shouldn't jump at -every- new technology.

      http://felix.openflows.org/html/mondexguelph.htm l

    8. Re:Excuse me, but by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative
      Five years ago, in France and in Italy, they were everywhere and they were accepted everywhere. Smart cards readers are like PCs and American cards are like internet browsers. Smart cards perform the transaction as soon as you give your pin and press the enter key. American cards perform the transaction after one or two seconds after you press the enter key.

      Smart cards probably have other advantages/disadvantages as well, but that's the only thing I picked up on when I was there.

    9. Re:Excuse me, but by trompete · · Score: 1

      Smart cards aren't just used for credit cards. My bus card in Germany didn't even have a magnetic strip. It just had a smart card strip that stored my balance.

    10. Re:Excuse me, but by swillden · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have a chip like that on my PSU ID and despite being only about a year old it sporadically decides not to work.

      Stop sporadically sticking it in the slot backwards!

      Seriously, I work with smart cards and I find your statement very hard to believe. Unless the contacts on your chip are really filthy and prevent the reader from getting a good connection, the chip will either work or not. I suppose it's possible that some really stupid software on the chip occasionally goes into a bad state (and then somehow recovers???) but given that a chip essentially "reboots" every time it's inserted in a reader, that would have to be some really bad software.

      On further reflection, one other possibility does occur to me: If the contact plate has partially broken loose from the chip underneath, it could be that it's only making contact intermittently. I've never seen a chip do this, though; usually if you manage to break the leads, they're broken and will *never* make contact.

      In any case, what you're experiencing is very uncommon. I recommend breaking the chip so that it *never* functions and then taking it in and complaining so that they give you a replacement. You can break it pretty easily if you place your thumbnails on the contact plate and crease it sharply. You can also shatter the chip by placing it on a hard surface (concrete works well) and hitting it hard with a hammer.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    11. Re:Excuse me, but by dacetone · · Score: 1

      Ag school? When I saw PSU I thought Penn State (has an ag school, but appears to be mostly a liberal arts school), U of Puget Sound (has no ag school), or Portland State (has no ag school). Which did I miss?

      --
      Just follow the day, and reach fo
    12. Re:Excuse me, but by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      One more idea: You are using it correctly, right? People often have a tendency to treat smart cards the same way they do a magstripe card in a self-service gas pump reader. With a smart card you have to insert it in the reader and then *leave it there* until the two computers (the one in your card and the one in the reader) are done communing. Generally this means you don't take the card out until the reader tells you to.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:Excuse me, but by EvanED · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Penn State started out as an ag school, and still has a very big (at least by ag school standards) program, helped by the fact that it owns an unbelieveable amount of land around central PA. I don't know what I'd classify it as though actually, but if I had to I'd say it's biggest area would be engineering anymore.

    14. Re:Excuse me, but by EvanED · · Score: 1

      The readers that are in vending machines and all other devices that are open to the general public (as opposed to, say, at a checkout counter in a store) hold the card while it is in use so you *can't* remove it early.

      To be fair, I have suspicions that one particular reader in a vending machine in my dorm somehow screwed things up because it seemed to have problems after I attempted to use it on several of the many occasions that the reader malfunctioned. Normally this wouldn'd bother me, but it also affected it's performance (if in fact that's the cause) in other machines as well.

    15. Re:Excuse me, but by mad+flyer · · Score: 0

      Wrong, as a French in exil in Japan (since 6 long weeks)... I Can tell you that the moneo system is just emerging. (a card that you refill with money completly anonymously up to a certain amount, but can be merged with a regular credit card, in this case I don't get how it is useful btw). In France: Written checks are slowly disapearing, Blue Card emitted by banks are everywhere (with ID chips) available with the "visa" option Use of credit card is as marginal as air cooling, you can use an American Express card on some place, but most of the time you are laughed at (maybe they should remove 'american' from the name) Real money is used for little things. But can be refused for 'Big things' unless you have a certificate from the bank where you withdrew it. (Big starting with small cars or motorbikes and aircrafts carrier spare parts) Blue card are always authenticated when used to pay something and money used is immediatly withdrawn from the holder account throught centralized network (same as ATM machines). Some banks offer a 30 days delays for withdrawal of the money, the bank pay for the goods and then 30 days after take the money from the holder account.

    16. Re:Excuse me, but by linca · · Score: 1

      Blue cards have been Smart Cards for quite some time, i.e. more than a decade.

    17. Re:Excuse me, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An all-girls school with enormous...tracts of land.

      Oh, agriculture.

    18. Re:Excuse me, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You must be an American

      yeah, we're not very "smart."

    19. Re:Excuse me, but by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      if you ever work for IBM (hint: don't) or Shell, then you'll use one of these everyday for food, drinks and in shell's case, logon to your PC

    20. Re:Excuse me, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not speak about same thing. I have been living in Hong Kong and visiting France often.

      "Octopus" has nothing to do with VISA-like credit cards. It looks like credit card but there is no magnetic stripe nor chip contacts on it. It is distance-readable as door keys in some companies.Octopus does not require PIN code. Just show it close to reader and money is taken from it.

      Smart cards in France are usual credit and debit cards having contacts on them. They need to be enteres into reader and chip is used to verify PIN code.

      They nearly nothing common in use. Octopus is real fast method of payment, chip cards are not. Chip cards have big credit limits, Octopus does not. Their use is very different.

      http://no.spam.ee/~tonu

    21. Re:Excuse me, but by Hammerikaner · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can also shatter the chip by placing it on a hard surface (concrete works well) and hitting it hard with a hammer.

      I find this hammer technique works well with most things.

    22. Re:Excuse me, but by swillden · · Score: 2, Informative

      The readers that are in vending machines and all other devices that are open to the general public (as opposed to, say, at a checkout counter in a store) hold the card while it is in use so you *can't* remove it early.

      Capturing readers are nice.

      To be fair, I have suspicions that one particular reader in a vending machine in my dorm somehow screwed things up

      I can't see any way a reader could mess up your card... overvoltage, maybe? But that would tend to make the card completely unusable, rather than intermittent. Of course, since I've never seen a card that functions intermittently, I can't be sure.

      I wish I could test your card.

      Anyway, I can assure you that your experience is not common. Smart cards either work, or not, and they pretty much just work. They're much more durable and reliable than, say, a magnetic stripe or a printed barcode.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    23. Re:Excuse me, but by Speare · · Score: 1
      Our apartment uses a smartcard-based laundry system. One machine turns cash (in big bills) into smartcard-backed credit. Each washer or dryer has a smartcard slot. While the materials say that the card should be able to endure all laundry-related conditions, including being inadvertently washed and/or dried, there are a LOT of reports of people who get a few uses from the card and then it stops working. Poof, there goes $18.30 remaining credit. My own card died too, even though we kept it in its own sleeve and away from pretty much any hazard.

      It's really easy to say that a device is hardy enough for any predicted abuse, and then to ignore the evidence to the contrary as being 'unconfirmed' or 'anecdotal.' At some point of market saturation, anecdotes win over clinical trials, whether by fact or by consumer perception. It's important to really dig into anecdotal evidence of weaknesses before the whole idea has to be scrapped.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    24. Re:Excuse me, but by bbbbblustery · · Score: 1

      mine worked intermittenly, cos it was filthy rubbing the chip thing mostly always helps

    25. Re:Excuse me, but by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Here is my anecdotal experience:

      I took a smart card, ran it over several times with my truck, turned it over and ran it over a few more times.

      After doing that it was pretty dirty so I put it in the dishwasher with a load of dirty dishes and ran it on the "Pots & Pans" cycle. Noting that it still functioned perfectly after doing this, I put it in amy jeans pocket and ran the jeans through the wash and the dryer. Still works perfectly.

      There are plenty of ways to kill a card, but most of them require some intent. I have never encountered a card that has failed through normal wear and tear. I am not saying that such a thing does not exist.

    26. Re:Excuse me, but by cheezit · · Score: 1

      Some of the campus smartcards that I have seen are NOT credit-card style (screened logo and raised lettering). Instead, they look like driver's licenses, with a color photo under tamper-resistant plastic laminate that has a hole for the smartcard contacts.

      Just as with a regular driver's license, with enough abuse the plastic will delaminate, causing shredding of the card where the reader's contact fingers try to touch the chip contacts. Wonky plastic bits in the contact path cannot be good for reliability.

      --
      Premature optimization is the root of all evil
    27. Re:Excuse me, but by dacetone · · Score: 1

      Well, I learn something new every day :) Thanks.

      --
      Just follow the day, and reach fo
    28. Re:Excuse me, but by swillden · · Score: 1

      While the materials say that the card should be able to endure all laundry-related conditions, including being inadvertently washed and/or dried, there are a LOT of reports of people who get a few uses from the card and then it stops working. Poof, there goes $18.30 remaining credit.

      Complete failure of a card is something I can understand. They're pretty tough, but it is possible to damage them. It's the intermittent operation of the other poster's card that confuses me.

      That said, I have to wonder if your laundry system uses some kind of really cheap and fragile cards, because in my experience they're pretty hard to break unless you're trying. Not to say that failures don't occur, but if it's a common occurrence, there's a problem.

      It's important to really dig into anecdotal evidence of weaknesses before the whole idea has to be scrapped.

      Which is why I wish I could get my hands on the other poster's card. If there really is some sort of intermittent failure mode, I'd like to understand it.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    29. Re:Excuse me, but by markhb · · Score: 1

      I believe that the "Smart card" evolution in Europe is more-or-less directly attributable to the expensive phone service there. In the US, a phone connection for the mag-stripe card reader (whether dial-up or leased line) is comparatively much cheaper than the high rates in Europe, so the built-in authorization the smart cards make available (which is the only effective difference between the two types of cards) isn't worth the added cost. In fact, outside of some universities and the Amex Blue card, the only smart cards I've seen in general circulation here in the US are for individual laundromats.

      Remainder of my .sig: be the majority of voters.

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    30. Re:Excuse me, but by Myrcurial · · Score: 1

      You tend not to carry that kind of value on a real (non-internal-to-my-university) stored value card. I was a participant in a Mondex stored value experiment in a large-ish (90,000 people, one university, one college) town. At the most, I had $50 or so on the card -- as every Payphone provided a method to move cash from a bankaccount onto the card. It was useful for little transactions (convenience store, parking meter, etc.) but was the best for paying someone across town. If you both had a mondex enabled phone, you could each insert a card and move cash in either direction.

      Check the following links for details:

      Mondex missed the boat though -- the real killer app for Mondex is person to person transfers over the internet. Attach a cheap smart card reader to your pc and away you go. (Mondex had a reader that simulated a floppy - you put your card in the carrier and the carrier in the PCs floppy drive). That would cut any paypal-ish goofs from the internet and make it easy to do person to person funds transfers.

      Just my two cents... Canadian.

    31. Re:Excuse me, but by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      same for me, but mine wasn't a smart card, it was a magnetic card. I had to get it remagnitized twice already.

  5. Some suggestions by monsieur · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Dear Leonardo Da Vinci,

    This is a fantastic article. I just have a few suggestions on how to clean it up.

    First off is the introduction. It's too wordy. You dance around your thesis like a barefoot child on a griddle. Try being more direct, more concise. Get right to your point, then move on.

    Now I'm not terribly familiar with the scientific method, but I think your experiment isn't described fully enough for the audience to gain any insight from it. First of all, you haven't given us much of a hypothesis to go on. What is it you really hope to gain from your testing? We have a vague ideal of the goal, but it's hard to see the true motivation that's pushing you towards such a goal.

    Your depiction of the experiment itself is more than adequate. I don't really have any complaints here. It actually reminds me of an experiment I devised in my youth. Heh, that was a real mess. I remember it like it was yesterday.

    It was the summer of 1873. The country was industrializing and the West was still being settled. For a young lad in rural Kansas, such as myself, life was a little more interesting with the railways making far-off cities more accessible to the common folk. My parents had been planning a trip to Knoxville for some time now, to visit relatives. My father sold a few of his cattle and scraped together enough money for us to make the journey. Mom, pop, my two brothers Anthony and Skeet, and my sister Juliana, all got on the Southern Express, headed east for St. Louis and on to Knoxville.

    It had never occurred to me just how boring a train ride could be. My brothers ignored me, as usual, and my sister was fawned over by my mother constantly. With my dad sleeping most of the time, I was left to entertain myself.

    The train was very crowded. I'd never seen so many people crammed into one place outside of church. Some of them weren't farm-folk, neither. There were a couple men and ladies in fine dress clothes, probably city dwellers. A few man were even worse dressed than us, probably miners or something. One of them had been staring at me for almost half an hour. I went over and talked to him.

    "Hey mister. This your first time on train? It is for me!"
    "Nooo, I ride trainss hic all the time."
    "You okay mister? You smell funny."
    "Heh heh ... at's because i haven't WASHed in threeeee days, son."
    "My mom says to take a bath every day or the devil will eat my soul!"
    "Well, now, ain't that precious ... you want a drink?"
    "Okay!"

    That man introduced me to alcohol, my future, and my undoing. That man's moonshine set me on a long road to endless sorrow and pain. My drinking problem escalated rapidly. Upon arriving in Knoxville, I had already completed five twelve-step programs. None of them worked.

    Fast foward to 2173. Shortly after my 900th birthday, I will go out for a binge with my friends Jesus Christ and Karl Marx. The three of us have been buddies for longer than I can remember. We will often get together to swap stories, talk about girlfriends, that sort of thing. We will drink, of course -- always heavily and always grain alcohol. Jesus never has any problem with the stuff, of course, but Karl and I can only down so much before we go blind and vomit our intestines out on the bar. Jesus can really work miracles, though. That guy will always have us patched up by morning.

    Anyways, Jesus and Karl will be having a heated discussion about the relative merits of kittens and puppies.

    "Kittens are fuzzy, and God is fuzzy, therefore kittens are better," Jesus will argue.
    "Yes, but puppies grow into dogs, and dogs work in packs for greater effeciency, and to the benefit of dogs everywhere," will be Marx's counter.
    "Kittens are really soft, and God is soft, therefore kittens are better," Jesus will reply.
    "Dogunism has no place for your purring and your pawing and your meowing! The barking class will not stand for the placidity of the feline

    1. Re:Some suggestions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir,
      I note with deep regret you do not have a journal. Perhaps you have a mailing list to which I can subscribe ?

      Sincerely,

      Trollaxor

    2. Re:Some suggestions by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      I know I'm offtopic and feeding a troll, but dude...that was one of the funniest pieces of troll literature I've read in months.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    3. Re:Some suggestions by monsieur · · Score: 0

      Thank you dear sir!

    4. Re:Some suggestions by MoThugz · · Score: 2, Funny

      This may be offtopic and/or trolling... but it's definitely more entertaining than the linked article.

      Bravo!

    5. Re:Some suggestions by strider3700 · · Score: 1

      I may have to browse at -1 from now on. This is easily the best thing posted all day.

    6. Re:Some suggestions by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Karma be damned, this the funniest OT thing I've seen posted in a long time. Bravo!

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    7. Re:Some suggestions by CausticWindow · · Score: 0, Troll

      It is also true.

      Both Jesus and Karl Marx were dirty damn jews.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    8. Re:Some suggestions by darqchild · · Score: 1

      *applause*

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
  6. Smart card? by Gherald · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the article: Other technologies developed in the 1990s didn't make the list because most have not reached the level of impact that the following items have.

    So they ignore all the cool 1990's technology that has already had widespread influence and put the Smart Card on the list, which has never amounted to anything...

    1. Re:Smart card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They are actually being used in Europe for all sorts of different purposes. One of which is my movie pass, which when I purchase 20 seats in advance gives me a great discount of at least 7 CHF. So they are being used, only not in your backward assed Texan run country

    2. Re:Smart card? by Gherald · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So they are being used, only not in your backward assed Texan run country

      Here we use credit cards. Its more secure to have financial information stored server-side.

      Smart cards can be hacked. I should know, I used refill my public telephone calling card back when I lived in Argentina.

    3. Re:Smart card? by neverkevin · · Score: 1

      Just because there are a few techno people are dishonest enough to steal money from the phone company doesn't mean that they are not innovative. Sure, it is better to have banking balances and such server side, it MUCH cheaper to store balances for small fee transactions on a smartcard. So for something like phones or subways, the amount of money that is saved by not keeping a central database and the infrastructure that it requires is probably greater then the theft.

    4. Re:Smart card? by lpret · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I live in Texas and I use a smart card every day. I have never met a cocky Swiss, but I guess there's always a first. Seriously, go fuck yourself.

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    5. Re:Smart card? by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Informative
      "Here we use credit cards. Its more secure to have financial information stored server-side."

      I guess you don't have a checking account. Here in the US it takes one to five days to get checks reconciled. So even if you don't ever use your checkbook. The very fact that you have a checking account puts you at risk from having your account cleaned out.

      In some ways, smart cards are just like checks, they don't get reconciled immediately, but they can get reconciled within a few seconds if necessary.

    6. Re:Smart card? by linca · · Score: 1

      Smart cards can be hacked. I should know, I used refill my public telephone calling card back when I lived in Argentina.



      Phone calling cards use a vastly different technology from modern smart cards ; the former is a glorified abacus, the second an actual computer (built to prevent hacking). Okay, computers are abacus, too, but those on microchips run Java now.
    7. Re:Smart card? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha... people that are so ridiculously proud of graduating from a "top 25" university (which is likely ranked somewhere around 50th) make me laugh!

    8. Re:Smart card? by Nukenbar2 · · Score: 0
      This is a fairly large misconception.

      In the US, there are limits placed on the liability from a credit card or a debit card. While the rule are quite technical, they mostly boil down to:

      Credit Cards: $50 liability just about no matter what.

      Debit Cards: max $500 liability, normally less) unless you don't contact the bank within 60 days after receiving the statement on which the first unauthorized charge lies.

      Therefore, if you are an idiot who NEVER checks his statement or have no money, then yes, you can have your account emptied out. But the rest of us do have some protection.

    9. Re:Smart card? by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      This is a fairly large misconception.

      I know about the limited liability protection our government gives us. In fact, I cringe everytime I hear a bank make it sound like the standard protection all banks are *required* to give us is something *unique* that *only* their bank is offering out of the kindness of their heart.

      I didn't want to overwhelm the original poster with all the details. I didn't feel it was especially relevant, since our smart cards, the ones that will be linked to our accounts, will probably have the same protection our existing accounts already have.

  7. I volunteer by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    to test all new new inventions coming out of the mint. I can handle large test batches too.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  8. different flavou^Hrs of money? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How thought up making different currencies have different appearances? It's because of them that sending $599 in monopoly money to SCO can be done safely, without fear of said money going toward their legal fund.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  9. Historic inventions are nice by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 4, Interesting
    .. but the future is even more interesting.
    Just Imagine all the new possibilities for new cominations you can arrange if you combine the latest in technology with the old paper bill.

    I'm really looking forward to the bill that makes its possible to track where the bill was, who used it and what was bought. For example, retailers could produce special targeted advertising for peole that came with money they had won in a lottery. If the retailer knows where the customer has grabbed the money its much easier to sell thing based on customer history and public profiles.

    A on the security side the government can destroy money that belongs to suspected criminals and therby prevent crime before it takes place. If you don't have cash its difficault to opperate for example a drug ring.

    --
    Proud patriot and republican voter.
    1. Re:Historic inventions are nice by moitz · · Score: 4, Insightful
      the government can destroy money that belongs to suspected criminals and therby prevent crime before it takes place.

      Yeah, screw that whole "innocent until proven guilty" thing. Where'd that Constitution thingy go anyhow?

      -moitz-

      --
      Screw 'em...who cares what anyone thinks.
    2. Re:Historic inventions are nice by cvk · · Score: 1

      OMFG, you have to be kidding! Do you really think anyone wants the last truly anonymous method of payment to become another tracking method of tracking our cashflow (as if enough ways didn't exist already)? A recent /. article foresaw thieves who targeted victims by RFID's in their money. Are you actually trying to hasten that day's coming?

    3. Re:Historic inventions are nice by zCyl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obligatory Where's George link.

    4. Re:Historic inventions are nice by freeweed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure this was intended to be moderated Funny, and if not, I'm really scared.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    5. Re:Historic inventions are nice by metrazol · · Score: 2

      Uhm, let me get this straight. According to your sig you're a Republican (mod down accordingly, y'all). Now, this is the same Republican Party that believes that no one should have to tell the gov't if they have a gun, what kind of gun it is, or where they keep it, whether their house, car, or pocket.

      So, a proud member of this same party wants to track all the money in everybody's pockets. Tell me, is it easier to get something with a gun, or with cash? Just change your comment to "gun" instead of "money" and you'll see how little sense your comment makes.

      Now for a little info on the drug trade and the cash economy. Very large parts of the US economy are going cash only, such as illegal immigrants and deadbeat parents working under the table, taxless sales, and, of course, good ol' criminal activities like prostitution and drug dealing. So the next time a, ehem, generally Republican small business owner (check the Small Bus. Assoc. lobbying records of you think they're a bunch of liberals...) pays his Guatemalan bus boy or that Australian kid in cash, he'll find his wallet has burst into flames?

      And just to wrap up, why bother discussing drug dealing as the big cash based underground business? Under the table wages are much bigger, and the big money in drug trafficking goes electronically. $1,000,000 will NOT fit into a regular briefcase, no matter how hard you stuff it! I've tried! Now just try cramming $100,000,000 into your little Cessna and flying somewhere with it, or driving through the US-Mexico border (the Canadian border is a joke, but you can try there too.) Now, launder that cash a little and voila! Your $100,000,000 just went to Liberia and Grand Cayman in 200ms. Which wad of cash exactly would burst into flames then? Oh, right, don't forget to run off with the company's pension fund, too!

      I'm a Democrat. Punk.

      --
      "Life's funny sometimes." "And sometimes it isn't." --Cat's Cradle
    6. Re:Historic inventions are nice by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      retailers could produce special targeted advertising for peole that came with money they had won in a lottery. If the retailer knows where the customer has grabbed the money its much easier to sell thing based on customer history and public profiles.


      So you like spam? Spam is the result of retailers having your email adress and you want to give these people even more ammo to annoy us? no, thank you!
  10. TLA acronym abuse by jolyonr · · Score: 1, Funny

    "While I'm glad to see the ATM machine made the list"

    And what does the M in ATM stand for again?

    --


    Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
    1. Re:TLA acronym abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marclar?

    2. Re:TLA acronym abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Menstruation?

    3. Re:TLA acronym abuse by don.g · · Score: 1

      Mode, of course.

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    4. Re:TLA acronym abuse by funkmastermike · · Score: 1

      sigh..
      NIC card

    5. Re:TLA acronym abuse by Rosonowski · · Score: 1

      How about Asynchronous Transfer Mode Machine?

      --
      01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010
    6. Re:TLA acronym abuse by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Manager, duh!

    7. Re:TLA acronym abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PIN number?

    8. Re:TLA acronym abuse by gblues · · Score: 1

      "Mode," of course.

      Nathan

    9. Re:TLA acronym abuse by lpret · · Score: 1

      Isn't that Texas A&M? Oh wait, that's aTm...

      --
      This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    10. Re:TLA acronym abuse by glwtta · · Score: 1
      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    11. Re:TLA acronym abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, you gotta use your PIN number with the ATM machine.

    12. Re:TLA acronym abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what does the M in ATM stand for again?


      It stands for AT-Muthafuckin Machine, you stupid muthafucka!

  11. Fiat Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of the top 10 'innovations' would have to be the removal of gold backing the Dollar, allowing for huge national deficits. A nice timeline is here.

    1. Re:Fiat Money by calyxa · · Score: 1

      I thought the dollar was originally backed by silver, not gold. didn't it used to say 'silver certificate' on the back?

      -calyxa

      --
      Decay! Decay! Decay! -Helium
    2. Re:Fiat Money by mattbelcher · · Score: 1

      How long must this century-old debate continue? There is nothing special about currency backed by gold. Why is paper money worth something? Because people will give you something you want in exchange for it? Why are shiny rocks worth something? Because people will give you something you want in exchange for it. As far as value is concerned, there's no difference between currency backed with gold or not "backed" at all, except that with gold-based currency, your currency supply is un-regulatable, leading to massive inflation if a new gold supply is found. Also, currencies based on precious metals gives the government no way to contract or expand the money supply. And besides, why would switching away from the gold standard allow huge national deficits? The government can't borrow gold?

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

    3. Re:Fiat Money by jerryasher · · Score: 1

      I think you've made the parent's point.

      Realizing the truth of your argument, that there is nothing special about currency backed by gold, and implementing it by letting the dollar and other major currencies float, was surely one of the most remarkable (and remarked on) monetary actions of the 20th Century.

      (However, it did cause stock in one bond (movie) to fall.)

    4. Re:Fiat Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government can only borrow the quantity of gold that exists. Paper-printing presents no such limitation...Gold's scarcity makes it valuable. Inflation is the opposite of scarcity, which is why it's rarely a risk with gold.
      me

    5. Re:Fiat Money by khallow · · Score: 1

      Fiat money isn't a 20th century invention. Hence, it doesn't qualify.

    6. Re:Fiat Money by khallow · · Score: 1

      Well, ultimately, it boils down to supply. It's hard to inflate the supply of gold (even if someone strips say the asteroid Eros of its gold, gets gold from sea water, or whatever), and a trivial matter for a fiat currency. OTOH, I don't see a real problem. People can switch back to a gold-based currency if the fiat one falls apart.

    7. Re:Fiat Money by mattbelcher · · Score: 1

      Right. I assumed he was being sarcastic, and was trying to say that the move to floating currency was a horrible mistake (a view shared by the site he linked). I was trying to point out the opposite.

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

    8. Re:Fiat Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is rather simple. It takes a recognized finite amount of time, labor, and effort (albeit variable) to extract gold from the Earth and hence currency backed by gold is not spontaneously created by inherently corrupt central bankers who could and otherwise do print money out of thin air at the expense of the masses whose currency shrinks in value every time paper is run off the presses. Here's a little fact, every fiat currency bar none utilized since the beginning of civilization has failed.

    9. Re:Fiat Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is true. But turning the Dollar into Fiat Money is a 20th century 'innovation.'

      And as way of striking on the relevance of my parent post, what happened to all of those previous fiat currencies? Where is the Roman currency, the Ottoman currency, or the pre-World War II German currency whose hyperinflation helped Hitler into power? Oh, that's right: They're not worth the paper they (may) have been printed on.

    10. Re:Fiat Money by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      The government can only borrow the quantity of gold that exists.

      Not exactly true. The government could borrow gold, spend it, and then borrow it again (from those that have it now), spend it again...

      That's basically how it is possible that the banking system increases quantity of money (even without printing privileges): Customer A deposits (paper) money in bank (into his checking account or savings account). Customer B takes a credit and gets the money A paid in. B spends the money, and the guy he paid it to may again deposit it in a bank... All while A still has the usage of his money (he may spend it via check or electronic transfer) ===> banks create scriptural money. Of course there are limits to the process, as banks are forced by law to keep a certain percentage of the deposits in their vaults ( Cooke ratio), but due to this phenomenon there is actually ten times more money in circulation than exists physical money (paper, coins)!

    11. Re:Fiat Money by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Hell, you could say the same thing about gold and silver currencies, where in some cases, the currencies themselves weren't even worth the value of the gold and silver in the coin. Money fails when the governments backing that money fail. Fiat or otherwise. It's just that gold traditionally has had more value than paper or cotton or papyrus so your money does not effectively become completely worthless.

    12. Re:Fiat Money by khallow · · Score: 1

      Even the fiat dollar is supposed to have lost 90-95% of its value since it became a fiat currency. But that's pretty good for a fiat currency given the time span. The truth is that fiat currencies always inflate.

  12. Never Trust The Client by rsmith-mac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Frankly, smart cards shouldn't be on that list, as the intended use(storing money on the card) has not been perfected against people hacking the card for more money. Smart cards trust the "client", and as any MMORPG developer can tell you, that's a bad thing. Paper money and credit cards at least have some protection, smart cards on the other hand are a relitively easy fraud source for anyone with a card writer, and the resources to use it; unlike any other method, you end up with a perfect "digital copy" of the money.

    1. Re:Never Trust The Client by davejenkins · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Frankly, smart cards shouldn't be on that list, as the intended use(storing money on the card) has not been perfected against people hacking the card for more money.

      So does cold hard cash. Instead of a card-reader, the bad guy just needs a knife. Are you saying we shouldn't use cash, because it isn't "secure"?

      Smart cards trust the "client", and as any MMORPG developer can tell you, that's a bad thing.

      Again, so does cash. All money trusts the 'client' to a certain extent: your bank account has a big gaping hole with your PIN and account number.

      Paper money and credit cards at least have some protection, smart cards on the other hand are a relitively easy fraud source for anyone with a card writer, and the resources to use it; unlike any other method, you end up with a perfect "digital copy" of the money.

      Well, anyone with a half-decent digital printer can roll his own Jacksons and Franklins. Again, the law is the law, and the men in suits will find you no matter your "method" of crime.

    2. Re:Never Trust The Client by linca · · Score: 1

      Good. Now the US government will soon put you in eternal custody, for the knwoledge of how to factorize large number must not be spread. Because that's what you need to do to reproduce a smart card...

      Actually, faking paper money or lying one's way through credit cards applications are probably easier.

    3. Re:Never Trust The Client by rsmith-mac · · Score: 1

      That is all true, but the difference between "real" money and "digital" money is that with digital money, you're going to end up with "perfect" money; no flaws, nothing to track, just 1's and 0's. Real money has ink, paper, and numerous physical traits to identify it, making a "perfect" copy nearly impossible, digitial money is as simple as figuring out what the ATM told the smart card to make it say it had more money.

    4. Re:Never Trust The Client by southpolesammy · · Score: 1

      Well, anyone with a half-decent digital printer can roll his own Jacksons and Franklins. Again, the law is the law, and the men in suits will find you no matter your "method" of crime.

      Sure, with a decent photo printer and an excellent image of the dollar bill in question, perfect image copies can be produced, but the missing link is the paper on which it is printed. That certain type of paper that American money is printed on is nearly impossible to duplicate from a material sense and is heavily guarded from creation to printing. Also, the advent of watermarks, different kinds of ink, and the upcoming different colors on larger denomination bills make it even harder to reproduce.
      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    5. Re:Never Trust The Client by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Sure, with a decent photo printer and an excellent image of the dollar bill in question, perfect image copies can be produced, but the missing link is the paper on which it is printed. That certain type of paper that American money is printed on is nearly impossible to duplicate from a material sense and is heavily guarded from creation to printing.

      Crane's Crest Fluorescent Opaque White. It doesn't have the red and blue fibers, but the paper itself is nearly identical. I suggest printing resumes out on this paper.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  13. Re:Machine machine? by baximus · · Score: 1

    Knew someone had to make the comment - but I didn't think it'd make it FP.

    But I definitely think it's cool that so many inventions can be traced back that far (yes, I'm in my mid-twenties, and an Australian, so I'm an ignornat un-cultured love-child of the New Millenium).

  14. All this miraculous technology... by cvk · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...and what does it all lead to? Inventive new ways to pay for porn sites....

    1. Re:All this miraculous technology... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      The sole purpose of computer science is to provide more efficent methods of storing, cataloging, distributing and displaying pornography.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  15. Ah, ATM by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    5.) The Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) - 1939

    I think this is an invention that is both terrific and dangerous. I personally have decided to not get an ATM card, reasoning that if my money is harder to get to, it's harder to spend.

    1. Re:Ah, ATM by gfody · · Score: 5, Funny

      you should put your fridge upstairs too

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    2. Re:Ah, ATM by kbs · · Score: 1

      yeah, right next to the bedroom

      --
      yours,
      kbs
    3. Re:Ah, ATM by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

      5.) The Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) - 1939

      Oh, and it's caused a new episode of showing how fucked both our expectations are and our reality is: the hullabaloo over ATM fees.

      For those not familiar with the full issue: a company puts out an ATM machine and charges a fee to withdraw money from it. Some machines charge as much as $10 to withdraw $100.

      This got some people so hopping mad that, in some localities, they decided what a far fee would be, and mandated that the companies could only charge that.

      In response to that, most of the banks shut down access to ATMs from non-bank customers, and many of the private companies folded or cut down the number of ATMs available. There's talk of forcing banks to allow non-customers to use their system, etc. etc..

      In short: people's expectations are fucked, because they expect some things to be provided for free, and they've discovered they can legislate it to be for free. And they're shocked when they get the bill for what they did.

      On the other hand, I've heard that because of some legal situations, only a few establishments were permitted to run those ATMs, and there was some hanky-panky that closely resembeled collusion amongst the ATM companies and/or the locales that allowed the ATMs[1], that was pretty much enabled by the government (if you have enough competitors, it's pretty hard to have a "gentleman's agreement" amongst ATM providers).

      Anyone have more info regarding this?

      [1] - I heard that there were some situations where, say, a mall (which is only supposed to rent places out and maintain the facilities, not decided who lives and who dies) would make a deal only allowing one ATM company in, in exchange for a very nice rent. Then again, even that would seem to be within their rights.... I mean, everybody knows not to buy food at a theme park if you can avoid it. The same would become true of the mall and the ATM machines.

    4. Re:Ah, ATM by Rethcir · · Score: 1

      Have you considered a debit card? I've found that having a debit card SAVES me money (sorta). I say this because it keeps me from generating the approximatley 30 cents of change very time I make a small currency transaction for lunch, CD's, DVD's, and other purchases in the $5-20 range. That change just about always winds up down the seats in my car. When I lost my card for a while and had to go back to cash transactions, I took the spare change I eventually generated while waiting for my replacement card to a Coinstar (change sorter) machine and got back like $40 (AFTER a 9% fee). Your point is good though, I probably would not be as much of a spendaholic American pig-dog if it wasn't for my Plastic Pal who's Fun to Be With.

    5. Re:Ah, ATM by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      and park the car in the basement.

  16. Plastic money by questamor · · Score: 5, Informative

    Another one worth mentioning, Plastic money as used in several countries now, starting as a collaboration between a couple of countries using technology developed in Australia. It's a late 80s thing and only fairly recent, but something upwards of 30 nations use last I looked.

    1. Re:Plastic money by mvdw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes but they don't use it in the states, so it can't be that important, apparently.

    2. Re:Plastic money by questamor · · Score: 1

      Where did I mention credit cards?

      read here for more info.

      "Australia was the first country in the world to have a complete system of bank notes based on plastic (polymer). These notes provide much greater security against counterfeiting. They also last four times as long as conventional paper (fibrous) notes."

    3. Re:Plastic money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he said plastic money, not plastic... you stick made out of fuck.

    4. Re:Plastic money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was referring to actual bills made of plastic. If you bothered to check out what's going on outside your shithole town in the US of A now and then, you wouldn't look like an ignorant ass, fuckstick ...

    5. Re:Plastic money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said plastic money which refers to credit, not to money made of plastic. Might want to check your english usage next time.

    6. Re:Plastic money by aaza · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      You said plastic money which refers to credit, not to money made of plastic. Might want to check your english usage next time.

      Ahhhh, you appear to be speaking American English. Herein lies the problem. If you were speaking English you would not have confused plastic, plastic money and money made out of plastic (Those being Credit Cards, money made of a polymer and money made of a polymer).

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
      In practice, however, there is.
    7. Re:Plastic money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooooooh I shall have to remember that "red car" doesn't refer to a "car that is red" and "cute chick" doesn't refer to a "chick that is cute" too, and all sorts of other nonsensical shit I suppose?

    8. Re:Plastic money by Snoopy77 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Modded funny?

      The only thing funny is that the USians don't know what we mean. While you guys have pulling out soggy wads of green from your washing machines here in Australia we've been successfully laundering our plastic notes since the 80's.

      --
      "She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
    9. Re:Plastic money by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      we've been successfully laundering our plastic notes

      <HUMOR>
      Money laundering, eh? You're obviously a Terrorist Evildoer(tm)!

      Please stay where you are, and Mr. Ashcroft and company will be there soon!
      </HUMOR>

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    10. Re:Plastic money by bailster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Personally, I prefer to use cowrie shells.

      --
      ...
    11. Re:Plastic money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run a laundry business and those soggy wads of green are made from the same thing most clothes are mode off, cotton. Put them in the dryer and they're good to go.

    12. Re:Plastic money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the only thing about tags is that they tend to suck out any actual humor that would have been there before...

    13. Re:Plastic money by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Does plastic money grow on plastic trees?

      After reading this I think its obvious that it does. Money is so important Americans, who still profess their freedom to this day, were willing to make it illegal to possess gold. How fucked up is that? Very.

      But almost nobody will admit that we really don't need money to make the world go around. What we need is computers to organize all this "money" which is really just a reciept for our labor. Make things efficient, work together and organize your labor, and you'll never need money or commercialism or overtime. In fact most people don't even really need to work, which is why they can't find jobs. They only need money because we won't give them anything for free.

      So if there is so much surplus, wtf do we need money for? To keep some people rich. That's the only explanation I can think of. I mean, if we didn't possess the knowledge of computerized industrial automation, then yeah, maybe most people would need to work. But today? With modern technology?

      How much money does it cost to manage money, researching technology to prevent theft or counterfeiting? How about how much money it costs just to manage all your currency, print it out, make sure everyone knows its value, etc, etc, etc. And you what? The value of stock and the stock market is based almost entirely on its popularity. If people like it, want it, willing to pay for it, it goes up, like SCO. If they think it'll tank the pull their money out and make it tank, like the tech ecnomy within the US post CNN/Fox's DotComCrash reports. Its all a fucking illusion.

      But don't listen to me, go on and spend the rest of your life counting coins. I don't care.

    14. Re:Plastic money by smithmc · · Score: 1

      The only thing funny is that the USians don't know what we mean. While you guys have pulling out soggy wads of green from your washing machines here in Australia we've been successfully laundering our plastic notes since the 80's.

      "Soggy wads" - that would seem to imply that you think our money is made of paper. It's not; it's a fabric made of cotton and linen fibers. US notes will survive a trip through the washer and dryer.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    15. Re:Plastic money by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1
      you think our money is made of paper. It's not; it's a fabric made of cotton and linen fibers.

      It's not. It's paper made out of cotton and linen fibers. Fabric is woven or knit from spun threads of fibers. Paper is made by settling fibers out of a liquid medium.

      You're right about the washability of our currency, though.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  17. Talk About An Identity Theft Risk! by s.fontinalis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article:
    "American Express and MasterCard became huge successes overnight, and by the mid-'70s, Congress had to begin regulation of the credit card industry by banning such practices as the mass mailing of active cards to those who had not requested them."

    1. Re:Talk About An Identity Theft Risk! by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh. They allow this in the UK, and they have problems galore with it in the UK.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Talk About An Identity Theft Risk! by jwdg · · Score: 1
      Do they?

      They're forever telling me I've been pre-approved (subject to status) but I've never been sent an unsolicited card...

    3. Re:Talk About An Identity Theft Risk! by scottme · · Score: 1

      That's BS. While it does appear to be trivially easy to acquire ever more credit cards in the UK, it has been illegal for years to hand them out unsolicited.

    4. Re:Talk About An Identity Theft Risk! by radish · · Score: 1

      Er, no they don't and, therefore, no they don't.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    5. Re:Talk About An Identity Theft Risk! by boogy+nightmare · · Score: 1

      You obviuosly dont come form the UK then, the most you get is crappy junk mail saying you can have one. Even when i order a card or get a replacement card it arrives and i have to make a free phone call to get the thing activated before i start unsing it. Check your facts before you talk out of your arse..

      S

      --
      Kingdom of Loathing (www.kingdomofloathing.com) Addicted is me
  18. "Debt" printing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Top 10 Inventions in Money Technology During the 1900's"

    The countefiter's printing press.

  19. Anti-Conterfeiting Technology by rhysweatherley · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The article is good, but focuses mainly on technologies for automating the transfer of money (wire transfer, credit cards, ATM's, etc).

    There have also been significant leaps in the technology that is plain old paper currency. e.g. watermarking, plastic bank notes (Australia), holograms, etc.

    Would have been nice if they had explored this aspect also. Give me good old-fashioned currency any day.

    1. Re:Anti-Conterfeiting Technology by dapyx · · Score: 1

      Plastic banknotes ? A cool idea, but the only advantage is that you can wash your clothes with money in them. :-)

      --
      I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    2. Re:Anti-Conterfeiting Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is certainly an advantage, but they also last longer (cheaper for the government in the long run) and are harder to counterfeit (ever seen a color photocopier that can print to clear plastic with enough ink that you can't see through it, while leaving some portions clear?)

  20. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Insightful

    yes, I'm a small-c communist.

    and you sure are a big-M Moron. How can anybody in 2003 want to abolish money?

    Money isn't evil, it's just a portable simulation of real trade, just like you send files over the internet instead of having to go see the other guy and give him a diskette. The fact that certain goods or services can be overrated or underrated doesn't change the fact that money was one of the single greatest invention of the human race.

    You go trade sacks of grains in the sovkhoz with your fellow idealist friends, while everybody else will takes care of advancing civilization thank you very much.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  21. just a tad c ontridictory by Honor · · Score: 1, Funny

    donesn't it strike you as odd that they put together a paper on historic money technology to bring to a conference about the future of money?

    1. Re:just a tad c ontridictory by acceleriter · · Score: 1

      They want to point out any drawbacks of it so they can pave the way to the brave new world of the cashless society, in which every transaction is logged and taxed.

      --

      CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  22. I don't see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... creative accounting on the list. Of course I imagine that predates the 1900s.

  23. American? by pkhuong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Look elsewhere.

    Smart cards have been used to pay for stuff like gas in europe since at least 1997. I can't give you a precise date because all i know is i saw them in use when i went to France in '97. No they were not credit or debit cards.

    --
    Try Corewar @ www.koth.org - rec.games.corewar
  24. Ahem... by eggarsuit · · Score: 0, Troll
    I believe the two biggest of the "Last Century's Big Money-Related Innovations" were Bling-Bling and its predecessor, Bling. I was disappointed at their exclusion from the list.

    It's like I always tell the kids. A quitter never wins and don't trust whitey.

  25. the memory bank by lopati · · Score: 5, Interesting
    keith hart i think should have been one of the speakers, here's an excerpt from "the memory bank":
    The idea of money as a source of social memory was also crucial for John Locke, who figures prominently in our story as the philosopher who inaugurated the modern age of democratic revolutions. Locke was obsessed with money's role both in establishing a progressive social order and in subverting it as its criminal antithesis. Indeed, he believed that money launched humanity from the state of nature onto the road to civil government. As long as men's possessions were limited to perishable products, the scope for property was restricted. Money, by offering a durable store of value convertible against all useful things, unleashed the potential for property accumulation and for the intergenerational transmission of inequality. For Locke, then, money was indispensable to that development of cultural memory on which civilization depends.
    also btw, bernard lietaer should've been a speaker as well! (altho he is on the board :)
  26. Re:Pedant by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness nobody mentioned that most modern ATMs (no "machine" !!!) have a HDD drive inside and an LCD display ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  27. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    communism isn't about bartering. It's about having a gift economy, where people of the world don't need to put their faith in bits of paper with numbers printed on them, or bits on a disk/card, they put their faith in other humans.

    Idealistic? Yes.

    Impossible? No.

    Seek Enlightenment.

  28. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seek help.




    ...and not from me, find some other gift bearing human.

  29. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idealistic? Yes.

    Impossible? No.

    Considering that the soviet union was a total disaster maybe you should change that lastone to a yes. You might want to get paid in wirehangers but the rest of the world does not.

  30. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that the soviet union was a total disaster maybe you should change that lastone to a yes. You might want to get paid in wirehangers but the rest of the world does not.

    of course, all commies will tell you that the Soviet Union wasn't a "true" communist system (perhaps it wasnt, to the letter).

    Then you ask them to name any sucessful communist nations where all the goals and advantages are met, and you get no answer.

  31. Getting money from a wall by wass · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Totally off-topic, but your Sumerian reference is interesting, because at my former college (U. Penn) there was a scam going on there about 10 years ago based on similar phrasing.

    Some guy would pretend to be a newly-arrived African immigrant, asking his victim how to "get money from a wall." At that point, his accomplice would show up, pretending to be a stranger, also asking the student to help the poor guy out. The student, taking pity, would go to the ATM, enter their PIN, withdraw X dollars to show them how it's done.

    Then, supposedly, the guy 'shows' the student how to keep his wallet safe from thieves, by hiding it in a white bag in his pants, and demonstrates with the students wallet. At which point he gives the student the white bag back, and leaves. Moments later, when the student realizes the white bag he was given doesn't have his wallet, the two guys are nowhere to be found. And usually there was a very recent subsequent cash withdrawl with the student's ATM card.

    It was printed in my school paper that about half a dozen people got scammed this way. It was ridiculous, and even more so when I saw the movie "The Sting", where this scam was used exactly.

    This brings up some common sense. Firstly and most importantly, does anybody enter their PIN clearly and slowly on the keypad? Especially if there are strangers present? I always block the keypad, and use all 3 fingers to do it so it's entered quickly and discretely. I also can't believe the students gave their wallets to the guy to hold for only a few seconds, and didn't check when he 'gave' it back.

    But anyway, it all goes back to your Sumerian "Magic Wall". The phrasing that the thief used to imply his technological innocence and lack of understanding with modern Western society, hence creating a sense of pity in the victim.

    --

    make world, not war

    1. Re:Getting money from a wall by StArSkY · · Score: 1

      "and use all 3 fingers"

      What! You only have three fingers! That must have been one hell of an accident to involve both hands!

      --
      lounge around on the blue couch
    2. Re:Getting money from a wall by wass · · Score: 1
      dang gurnit, too quick rootin-tootin typin'!

      No, i mean use the three fingers designed for those numeric keypads. I've gone to countless supermarkets where the cashiers type quickly, but inefficiently, with one finger hopping all over the keypad. Kind of like when I first learned to type I used only my two index fingers on the whole keyboard.

      It's a rare sighting when I see someone using a numeric keypad with all three fingers that the keypad was designed for (hence the little bump on the 5 key for centering).

      --

      make world, not war

  32. Strangely missing... by ccnull · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No anti-counterfeiting technology? (Security strips in money, inks that change color when you change the angle, microprinting)

    Surely there has been SOMETHING of interest to come from the financial/tech world to be invented in the last 20 years.

    1. Re:Strangely missing... by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

      It seems like they could have at least mentioned Frank Abagnale, Jr.

  33. Re:Machine machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but its not the first post...?

  34. From Article by Omkar · · Score: 1

    The social impact of the credit card cannot be under-estimated.
    That means it's really small! I think they mean it can't be oversetimated.

    1. Re:From Article by kgarcia · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The social impact of the credit card cannot be under-estimated.
      That means it's really small! I think they mean it can't be oversetimated."

      In this instance, the "cannot" does not mean "we are unable to underestimate the social impact", but rather, "The social impact of the credit card should not be under-estimated". In other words, don't under-estimate the social impact....

      or something like that. The author used the term correctly.

    2. Re:From Article by KnightStalker · · Score: 1

      Weird. According to Google, the phrase "cannot be overestimated" is approximately 1/3 as common as cannot be underestimated", and they appear to carry the same meaning. I would tend to agree with the OP though.

      --
      * And remember, it's spelled N-e-t-s-c-a-p-e, but it's pronounced "Mozilla."
    3. Re:From Article by Omkar · · Score: 1

      I don't know; while what you say is interesting, I don't quite agree.

      I always catch this because I remember this Dilbert strip, where Dilbert's like, "Hey, don't underestimate my intelligence." Dogbert responds, "I could never underestimate your intelligence," and Dilbert is satisfied.

    4. Re:From Article by odin53 · · Score: 1

      Usually, for that sort of meaning, one would say either "the social impact of the credit card SHOULD NOT be underestimated" OR "the social impact of the credit card CANNOT be overestimated."

    5. Re:From Article by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Another fun one to try figuring out is biweekly.

      About 50% of the people I talk with think this means twice a week, 50% think it means every two weeks.

      The latter are correct. Unfortunately the former use is so common that it has been included in many dictionaries of late.

      The interesting thing I've noticed is that there is almost no confusion over semi and bi prefixes for most larger time frames such as month and year/annual

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    6. Re:From Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could care less.

  35. Ancient Greek Banking by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first international banking system was establish ed by the Knights Templar during the crusades. ... I just think it's kind of interesting that banking has its roots in a militant order.

    International banking goes back to Ancient Greece. The various city-states amounted, in their day, to the equivalent of today's nation-states. They carried on bank-supported trade with each other, and with more distant states such as Egypt.

    Your point about banking having its roots in a militant order is well made. Indeed, governments have always reserved for themselves two things: armies and currency.

    --
    -kgj
  36. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    communism isn't about bartering. It's about having a gift economy

    Gift economy that works both ways (you give me something, I give you something back) is called "trade", is not new, and is a great slowdown to human commerce because (1) there is never a fixed value of something (it always has to be evaluated against the perceived value of something else), so it's hard to count how "much" you give or get, (2) you can't divide the value of an object (I can't give you half a vase for this chicken) and (3) you trade physical objects that the giver and the taker may not want to trade.

    That's what all pre-modern humans did before somebody invented a way to represent the value of something with a collection of other, smaller object, that are a conceptualisation of the value of the real object. In our modern times, the concept has even evolved from physical representations (coins, bills) to logical (binary data), but it's still the same idea.

    where people of the world don't need to put their faith in bits of paper with numbers printed on them, or bits on a disk/card, they put their faith in other humans

    But that's what you don't understand : without knowing it, people who put their faith in bits of paper essentially put their faith in creation, services, goods that human society monies represent. If I want very much to acquire a work of art you created, what's the difference between working hard at my field to pony up the 10 sacks of grain you want for it, and working hard at my field to sell my grain and used some of the cash to pay you ? the biggest difference is that, if I'm a ironmonger, I'll be able to buy your work of art with money, while I couldn't if you demanded sacks of grains for it, and I would have to trade my metal to someone with grain who wants metal, in order to acquire your object. Admit it's really more painful.

  37. Re:just a tad contradictory by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 1

    "Before we know where are going in the future, we have to know where we've come from."

    I used to hate history, until I found myself continually repeating myself.

    Oh, did I tell you? I used to hate history..

  38. Wish we could get rid of the FED by argoff · · Score: 4, Insightful


    The title says it all. The EURO too while were at it. IMHO, government has no business being in the money business other than punishing people who act fradulently, and holding dishonest people accountable. I'm not saying we should have a gold standard, but something whose value can't be manipulated by government policy. (Yeah, I know the FED technically isn't part of the US govt - but give me a break)

    1. Re:Wish we could get rid of the FED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, no thanks. I'll take FICA and the other government "intrusions." Or would you rather have another Great Depression when people can't get their money from their banks?

    2. Re:Wish we could get rid of the FED by ivaradi · · Score: 1

      I agree that government should have nothing to do with money, but I also believe that money should have certain properties (relative scarcity, divisibility, portability, durability) to serve its purpose well. It could be gold, or other metals, or anything else that has these properties.

      See Murray N. Rothbard's "The Mystery of Banking" (downloadable at http://www.mises.org/mysteryofbanking/mysteryofban king.pdf)
      for a very good treatment of this issue.

    3. Re:Wish we could get rid of the FED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is because the Jew bankers lended out more money than they actually had -- unfortunately nothing has changed today and we are bound to repeat the lesson.

    4. Re:Wish we could get rid of the FED by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      The Federal Reserve Bank is not a government institution -- it is a bank whose head officers are appointed by the US government.

      We've had almost 70 years of prosperity due in a large part to the efforts and policies of the federal reserve system.

      Plenty of wackjobs yearn for the days of the gold standard or banknotes (Bank of America or Fleet Dollars anyone?) These people fail to note the lack of currency stability that existed before the Fed system. No Fed or other central bank, no 15 or 30 year mortgages (5 year mortgages were the norm until the late 20's), no consumer credit, no innovation on the scale that we have experienced in the last 70 years.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    5. Re:Wish we could get rid of the FED by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      To have the properties that you desire, money would need to consist of an object that was scarce, divisible, portable and durable AND slowing increasing in availability.

      The only reason that gold was a tenable currency for hundreds of years of continuous economic expansion was the increases in availability.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    6. Re:Wish we could get rid of the FED by argoff · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, but I renember the hyperinflation of the 80's and then there's great depression of the 1930's (17-20 years after the fed started) - and most recently the dot.com crash. All were directly related to the FED, FED policy, and centralized money - say, wasn't the fed created on the justification that it could stop these things?

      It would have collapsed a long time ago if not for one thing: that no matter how you make a profit, the US government requires you to convert it to a dollar value and pay taxes on it. That creates an artifical demand for dollars that props up the fed, even if it is useless.

      Also, I find it disingenuious that some would attribute the "average" prosperity of the last 70 years to the FED. Free Americans are solely responsible for that prosperity, and noone else.

    7. Re:Wish we could get rid of the FED by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      The inflation and "stagflation" of the 1970's was largely caused by tight regulation of petroleum distribution at the time. The arabs cut oil supplies, the Federal government (ie not the bank) responed with a disasterous rationing policy to insulate farmers from supply shortages.

      The impact of the 1930 depression was increased greaty because of a LACK of action by the Federal Reserve system. Due partly to the intervention of President Taft, the Federal Reserve failed to make adequate supplies of cash and credit available to keep the banks open.

      In the cases the depression and dot-com boom, I think that market regulatory policy has more to do with these things than monetary policy? Do you suppose that 90% margin ratios in the 1920's and institutionalized pump and dump schemes and graft had something to do with these things?

      While free americans are responsible for their actions, free markets with cenralized monetary policy are responsible for their easy access to capital. Without capital, there is no prosperity. (Prosperity as modern economies define it.)

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  39. Ignored! by MOtisBeard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Huh. They completely ignored the giant stone coinage of the Yap Islanders. What could be more innovative? The money is too large and heavy to move, so instead of carrying it around and exchanging it, the people of Yap simply point to their money when they want to purchase something, saying "That one's mine. Now it's yours." No inflation, ever, 'cause the total supply of money is completely static. No loose change lost in the sofa. No underworld money laundering. No expensive infrastructure to maintain. One drawback, of course: the first Yap to figure out how to purchase a bulldozer from the mainland using giant stone coins will end up lord and master of the whole society.

  40. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then you ask them to name any sucessful communist nations where all the goals and advantages are met, and you get no answer.

    Exactly. communism can't be implemented by governments, that is just co-ersion. It has to be freely implemented by people in a grassroots fashion, outside of the state (and corporate bosses).

    It starts in your heart.

  41. gangs by qqtortqq · · Score: 4, Funny

    It wasn't until 1927 when the first armored car robbery occurred. The Flatheads Gang was responsible for this robbery near Pittsburgh, PA. It was reported that $104,250 was taken in the heist.

    Gangs had such cooler names back on those days.

  42. ROFLFMAOF!11!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  43. Arghhh.... by chriskenrick · · Score: 2, Funny

    ATM machine?

    What's next:

    PIN number?

    Contains Windows NT technology?

    Just say no to redundancy!

    1. Re:Arghhh.... by kgarcia · · Score: 1

      Aww c'mon! Being redundant and repeating ourselves for the sake of repetition is fun and entertaining!

    2. Re:Arghhh.... by yerricde · · Score: 1

      Just say no to redundancy!

      Thn wh 'vn 's vwls?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:Arghhh.... by kbs · · Score: 1

      Let's hear it again!

      Just say no to redundancy!

      Let's h...

      --
      yours,
      kbs
    4. Re:Arghhh.... by Mwongozi · · Score: 1

      Officially, "NT" doesn't stand for anything, because Microsoft found they weren't allowed to trade-mark the generic term "New Technology".

    5. Re:Arghhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets worse, here's a couple that i've heard a lot:
      CRT tube
      LCD display

    6. Re:Arghhh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just love the HTTP protocol!

    7. Re:Arghhh.... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Windows N-Ten Technology? Where's the redundancy?

    8. Re:Arghhh.... by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      Shouldn't that be:

      Just say no to redundancy! Just say no to redundancy!

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

    9. Re:Arghhh.... by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Officially, the official story changed to suit the needs of the officials.

  44. Hrmmm... by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 1

    IN the little bit of afterword, they mentioned pre-paid creidt cards. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that basically a debit card (pulling from checking or savins or whatever), or just like a normal gift card.

  45. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marx's communism requires the Government to enforce Communism at first. This is always where things go awry. The people in power abuse their power and the government starts going away from their goal of implementing communism.

    The number one reason I dont want Communism is that I am expected to happily submit to giving all my money to everyone else, even though other people may not have the same level of education or work as hard as I do.

  46. You didn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's NOT about trade. It's about doint what you feel you should do, and taking what you need. Yes, it works both ways, but you are not measuring what you give against what you take.

    Yes, far fetched. But it would represent a high evolution of humanity.

  47. SHUT THE FUCK UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU REDUNDANT ASS!

  48. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, that is Marx's communism, not all communism. Go read up on anarcho-communism. Quite a different story.

  49. The Bottom 5? by magores · · Score: 1, Funny

    5. The Dollar that the politicians crave
    4. The Dollar that the politicians get
    3. The Dollar that the politicians tax
    2. The Dollar that the politicians spend
    1. The Susan B Anthony Dollar coin

  50. Re:morons list top 10 tasks for the gnu millennium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tell them, robbIE!

  51. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feel free to tell me of a thriving (I'm not asking for perfection in all intended goals, but we have to be reasonable here) communist (of any variety) nation.

  52. USA only??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An interesting list..
    But why is there only US inventions in the list?
    Is it that the research only included US companys, or just another "USA is the only country in the world that can accomplish anything" list?

    It would be interesting to see a list of the inventions that did not make it in on the list.

    About smartcards, they are widley used in Sweden, and with digital ID they are going to be even more used so that belongs to the list.

  53. Public Key Encryption ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought public key encryption was invented at GCHQ in Britain.

  54. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Auroville (a bioregion in India) is having a good stab at it (a non-marxist, spiritual bent), although they still use money, it is their goal to become a commune.

    Also Spain in 1936 had some instances of anarcho-communism.

  55. Absolutely! by Xeth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Exactly! I can't wait until the government tracks our every move and makes the information available to corporations! That should sure totally eliminate all violent crime, and with no side effects, either! Maybe they'll allow us to all have cameras in our home, next!

    --
    If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
  56. Clear redundant clarity by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Consider "ATM machine" as opposed to "ATM data link" as opposed to "at the moment" abbreviated as opposed to "Adobe Type Manager" as opposed to everything else you find on. The pedantically redundant phrase "ATM machine" adds clarity.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  57. Using Virtual Cash to print something Real by quanta · · Score: 1

    I recently had an experience where I caused a real phsyical object to be
    transferred from a virtual location to a real location, using just my
    computer and the Internet.

    Every time I buy something with a credit card, I accumulate "points"
    which can be redeemed for various "things". These points seem to appear
    out of thin air. I don't pay for the credit card and I don't carry a
    balance, so they cost me nothing. However, unlike real cash, they
    evaporate after a year.

    My daughter (who lives 400 miles away) mentioned the need for a griddle. I
    clicked on an image of 11"x18" non-stick griddle ( which cost me 12900
    points), entered her home as the Ship To address and voila! Two days
    later it magically appeared in her kitchen...

    A little slow, but it works. Is there an RFC for this protocol?

    1. Re:Using Virtual Cash to print something Real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im not shure, send it written in RFC standard format to the RFC editor just before 1april and you might get it in ;)

    2. Re:Using Virtual Cash to print something Real by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      The points don't appear out of 'thin air;' the points are what you get in exchange for graciously allowing your purchasing data to be sold to other companies.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  58. Argh. by blacklite001 · · Score: 1

    He said "ATM Machine". Why? Why do people insist on doing that?

    Argh.

    1. Re:Argh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are bored of reading "Windows NT Technology" when they start there computer? =)

    2. Re:Argh. by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      The same people who brought you "Gnu's Not Unix"?

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

  59. Octopus: Hong Kong smart card - Re:Excuse me, but by bailster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Hong Kong we use a smart card (stored value card) called the Octopus. I wear a waterproof Octopus watch, which contains the smart chip.

    With the watch/card I can:
    --take a bus or minibus from home to the subway station
    --get coffee and sandwich at starbucks near the subway station
    --ride the subway to the ferry terminal
    --stop at 7-11 and buy a magazine
    --pay for the ferry to one of many smaller islands
    --get a coke from the vending machine at the ferry terminal
    --go to the beach at a smaller island, don't worry about my "money" getting wet -- but no, the seafood restaurants and island bars won't take the card...

    The card is totally anonymous (or so they tell us). Downsides: it has an upper limit of HK$1000, good for cheap stuff but nothing big, has to be refilled in person for cash, and isn't accepted at many places other than the ones just mentioned. The local McDonald's stopped taking them about a year ago. The Octopus was originally developed by the HK subway system (govt owned, now partially privatized) "from Australian technology" and was then extended to some retailers "near" subway facilities. I have a feeling the banks and bank regulators wouldn't let them go any further -- way too threatening.

    The upshot is that, except for the fact that you are required by law to carry your ID, you can basically spend a whole day outside without having to carry a wallet. Now, try to do the same thing in most other countries. Why hasn't anyone rolled this out in the US?

    [By the way, the HK govt is now phasing in smart card ID cards -- haven't heard what they plan to do with the info. Big bro has a new toy!]

    --
    ...
  60. ObMonty Python by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    Good evening and welcome to the Money Programme. Tonight, on the Money Programme, we're going to look at money. Lots of it. One film and in the studio.

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  61. Re:just a tad contradictory by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Remember Sammy Jankis?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  62. What about paycheck deduction by release7 · · Score: 1

    This is just a test

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

  63. Would you like some crackers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From Nabisco Co.? The National Biscuit Company Company.

  64. hmmmm... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

    The Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) - 1939
    The Credit Card - 1950

    11 years of "so...what the hell we going to put in it?"

    1. Re:hmmmm... by spike+it · · Score: 1

      ATM/bank cards != credit cards.

    2. Re:hmmmm... by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

      really?!?! seriously dude...get a joke

  65. SCO`s Memento by CB-in-Tokyo · · Score: 2, Funny

    SCO: "Okay, so what am I doing now?"
    (Spies IBM)
    SCO: "Ohh right, I am suing this guy!....Oh No! He's suing me!!!!!"

  66. Complete Bull by Raul654 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My Int'l Econ prof talked about this in class. The gold-standard emerged (more or less) out of WWII and was pushed by the US. This is because the US had most of the gold. During the stagflation of the 70's, the value of the dollar dropped, and most of the gold left the US. We were down to like 40% of the WWII era. (Actually, technically, it never moved more than a few dozen feet. More or less every nation in the world except France keeps their gold at Fort Knox, and International trades are done by carting gold from one room to another inside the base)

    Anyway, the gold standard fell apart because it "fixes" the relationship of one current with respect to another, and the gold acts as a kind of balast to compensate for changes in the relationship. But as you can imagine, this is pretty unstable. Floating currencies, which is what 95% of most currencies are today, automatically compensate by changing exchange rates. Geographic discrepencies are arbitraged away. The system works.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Complete Bull by Walter+Wart · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would ask for a refund for that class. In what is possibly the greatest political speech in US History William Jennings Bryan put forward the bimetallic standard as a reaction to gold-backed currency. "We shall not crucify American farmers on a cross of gold." Long before WWII.

      The gold standard "fixes" nothing in any real sense. Gold is a commodity like any other. Its value changes over time depending on the degree to which people want it. The quantity also changes. People still dig the stuff out of the ground. This changes the supply and hence the value according to neoclassical economic theory.

      --
      The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
    2. Re:Complete Bull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Actually, technically, it never moved more than a few dozen feet. More or less every nation in the world except France keeps their gold at Fort Knox, and International trades are done by carting gold from one room to another inside the base)


      Actually, that's incorrect. The majority of "trade gold" is held in the New York Federal Reserve, not Fort Knox. Fort Knox contains mainly Gold, Platinum, and Silver used to back our currencies. Althought there is exceptions, there are no "room" inside of Fort Knox for this type of trading.
      Also, no nations store all of their gold in the US. Like I said, it's considered "commodities" or "trade" gold, used expressly to make it easier for one nation to pay the other.

      I mean, really, do you think the entire world's gold stock is only 8967 tons? (Figure from June 2003 Treasury Report)

      Either your pulling a majority of your "facts" out of your ass, or your International Economics teacher is a moron, or the University of Delaware is a shit school.
      Ah, quick bit of reasearch shows UofD as a "middle of the road" college. Not great, but not bad. Just there. That explains a lot.

      Next time, don't be a puppet of your uneducated professor, do your own research.

    3. Re:Complete Bull by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's put it another way. Consider the dollar and the Yen. Let's say both are backed by gold. Each dollar is backed up by one ounce of gold in the US federal reserve, while each yen is backed up by two ounces provided by the BOJ. You have now fixed the relationship of the dollar to the yen at 2 dollars/yen. So yes, the gold standard does in fact fix relationships. If everyone uses gold, then they all flucauate equally, so changes in the value of gold do not impact trade relationships

      But let's say the japanese economy tanks, and they their buying power is really only 1 dollar/yen. People who have yen will trade them in (at the nominal rate of 2 dollars/yen) to get 2 dollars, and have thus doubled their real buying power. The BOJ then has to start buying yen with dollars (if they have them) or gold in order to equalize the value. But what happens if they run out of both? That was the trouble under the old system.

      That system fell apart, and (even though some new ones were suggested) no replacement was ever implimented. The "chaos" that ensued was basically the best system possible.

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    4. Re:Complete Bull by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      By "keeps their gold" I think it was an obvious implication that I didn't mean *all* of it. I do concede I could have been mistaken about the location - Ft Knox for the NY reserve, but the statement is still more or less correct. Trades are done by moving gold from one nation's room down the hall into a seperate nation's room. Sheesh, picky picky.

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    5. Re:Complete Bull by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      That is interesting.

      The country I live in asked to get some (most) of their gold back from the US, and got a resounding "NO F*ING WAY" as an answer.

      Might is right.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    6. Re:Complete Bull by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      I think Fort Knox is the wrong place. You were probably thinking of the New Federal Reserve Gold Repository in NYC. That may have changed after Sep 11, but I doubt it.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    7. Re:Complete Bull by radish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      or less every nation in the world except France keeps their gold at Fort Knox

      Interesting. I used to work at a precious metal processing company in the UK, who are one of the primary assay makers in europe. Most of the national gold of european countries (at the time particularly the newer, eastern nations) went through us at one time or another for testing, purification and certification. So unless they shipped it from the US to Cambridgeshire and then back again (kind of expensive!) I'd assume it lived in europe most of the time. But I don't really know, maybe they did ship it.

      I personally never saw any of the really big shipments (security was always stepped up so high us techies couldn't get in), but the storage room was usually quite entertaining - it's amazing just how small a pile of bricks makes up the reserve wealth of some countries!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    8. Re:Complete Bull by MourningBlade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unbacked systems (rather, systems backed with the "full faith and credit" of the issuer) have some very positive aspects.

      They can also have some very negative aspects.

      There are 3 types of taxes: taxes on trade, taxes on holdings, and taxes on the money supply. The third is very, very dangerous in a system where politicans are at least theoretically accountable to the people, as a tax on the money supply is a subtle death.

      Taxes on the money supply are usually levied by increasing the money supply. In its most egregious form, this is called "defecit spending" but it's not the only form. Altering rules of the FED is another way (and there's plenty of tricks that can be played there, but most of those do not involve porkbarrel politics).

      An interesting suggestion that some countries have followed (though sometimes for short periods of time) is to have an external entity control the money supply. This ranges from a banking board (the Albanian dollar{?} is done this way, and has shown remarkable stability recently, I'm told), to having government only be able to spend in foreign currency --- which is a very odd way of doing things, but it basically amounts to this: since you can't print your own Pounds without Britain getting somewhat upset, you have to buy pounds with dollars. This has the drawback, however, of if the government decides to go on printing money to buy Pounds (or, even worse, decides to set its own exchange rate and use theoretical pounds), things can go really crappy, really quick.

      The thing to remember is that taxing your money supply is much like borrowing against your economy.

      Of course, there are those who say that deficit spending is not a big deal. I've heard arguments ranging from "it has no effect" to "you can't show an effect" to "private sector expansion (bank loans and such) has a far greater impact than government does".

      I don't have any hard data, and I'm not enough of an expert to be able to interpret it well anyways.

      And don't expect to get a straight answer out of anyone: you're dealing with some severe belief systems here.

      On the one side you have the monetarists, and then you have the Keynsians, and so on and so forth. See here for some more.

      Oh, and so as to introduce a bit more current events, you might be interested to know that the monetary policy over in Iraq right now is truly fucked. Cato has been issuing reports on what's going on, and whether or not you're a Monetarist or Keynesian, things are not looking good.

    9. Re:Complete Bull by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Taxes on the money supply are usually levied by increasing the money supply. In its most egregious form, this is called "defecit spending" but it's not the only form.

      I'm not so sure I agree with your characterization. Deficit spending in and of itself doesn't increase the money supply (in the long term), as bonds issued to pay for the debt in the usual case. When the government "monetizes" the debt by simply printing more money to use for deficit spending, however, that indeed increases the money supply and increases inflationary pressures.

      In my opinion, the worst part about deficit spending is that interest on that debt becomes a significant chunk of the government budget. If the current administration could have held off on their reckless tax cuts for a couple more years, a substantive, sustainable adjustment to the tax code could have been made, based on a significant reduction in the national debt. Now that debt is rising quickly again, and when interest rates climb back up over the next few years, the $hit is really going to hit the fan...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    10. Re:Complete Bull by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

      Deficit spending in and of itself doesn't increase the money supply (in the long term), as bonds issued to pay for the debt in the usual case.

      True, bonds increase the money supply in the short term. They are competition for private investment, however, which is another bad thing, and is quite explicitly "borrowing against your economy" as investment is one of the things that fuels the economy.

      As for the tax cuts...I'd like to think that congress would've started buying back some of the debt, but I remember the talk of hugely expanded spending when the budget "surplus"[1] was announced.

      The problem is, since most people either a) have no problem with defecit spending, or b) (more commonly) don't care, there is no reward to politicians to pay off the debt. In fact, as it is a very nice and very subtle way to tarpit your economy, it might even be seen as a good way to keep a recession going so as to hurt your political opponent in office (remember: presidents are held accountable to the economy, not congress). Not saying that's happening now, but I am saying it's probably crossed a few politicians' minds over the years.

      But at the same time, there are serious hazards to preventing the government from defecit spending, and there are more important subjects to attend to. Besides, ever since congress discovered that the best way to stay elected is to have a bunch of nice cushy government contracts go to your district, we've been selecting politicians that will do it more and more often. Rather than get in the way of them doing what we want them to do, we could just stop rewarding them for doing it. Just something to think about.

      [1] - speaking of which, I really wish that when I didn't spend as much one year as the next (regardless of what I make), it was referred to as a "surplus" and was a sign that I could go out and spend a bunch of money. Yes, I know, it's a *budget* surplus, but....

  67. bonds & futures, etc by scotartt · · Score: 2, Informative

    They don't seemed to have considered things like government bonds (this underlies the whole system of currency!), and more importantly in the last 100 years, financial futures (futures contracts on bonds and the like) which to quote the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT); "In 1975, the CBOT expanded its offering to include financial contracts, initially, the U.S. Treasury Bond futures contract which is now one of the world's most actively traded."

    These are integral parts of the whole system in regulating and pricing the money supply! The article only seemed to have considered things that affect "money" as people would normally handle in the day to day running of our financial affairs; but still they chose to include inter-bank transfers, the armoured car, and the like.

    Pre-1900 there is the invention of paper money itself ... as once upon a time money was all gold and silver coin, the note being a promissary document to pay equivalent amount in bullion ... and some banknotes still say things like 'the bank of x promises to pay the bearer the sum of ... '.

    --
    -A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed-
    1. Re:bonds & futures, etc by jwdg · · Score: 1
      I accept the value of goverment bonds in the currency system, but I'm sceptical that financial futures are important to the economy. I would go so far as to assert that economic speculation disconnected from any productive activity is harmful to the productive economy.

      Cue lengthy arguments about Tobin taxes (or not - this may not be a turn-on for people...)

    2. Re:bonds & futures, etc by scotartt · · Score: 1

      whether we think it's a good idea was not the point ... it is a part of the price discovery process of finding out 'how much money costs' whether you like it or not.

      --
      -A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed-
  68. The Creature from Jekyll Island . . . by lavaface · · Score: 1
    Actually, the fed is an arm of the banks. As well as govenments across the globe.

    More info? Read The Creature and you will understand.

    The U.S debt will be the death of the nation.

  69. Thai money by lpret · · Score: 1

    Yeah, have you tried to rip Thai money? A friend of mine handed me a bill and said he'd bet me two of em if I could tear it in half. Being a manly man, I agreed and proceeded to spend quite some energy on doing nothing. It's also nice to be able to have it come out of the laundry just fine...

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  70. Yap inflation by ArsSineArtificio · · Score: 2, Informative

    No inflation, ever, 'cause the total supply of money is completely static.

    That isn't actually true - there's a smaller island near Yap where the special coins were periodically quarried and rafted back to Yap.

    Incidentally, Milton Friedman tells the story of how when Yap was part of the German possessions in the Pacific, the German colonial government once tried to force the Yap Islanders to assist in building infrastructure improvements on their island. The islanders weren't really terribly interested.

    So the colonial government drove around the island, and painted black crosses on many of the largest stones, signifying that the government had assessed them as a fine. Since these stones were now "off-limits" and removed from the money supply, the Yap economy suffered sudden, massive deflation. The panicked islanders, faced with a collapse of their economy, hurriedly agreed to help construct the required roads. Whereupon the Germans drove around and erased the crosses, enriching the islanders once more.

    --
    All employees must wash hands before seeking equitable relief.
  71. Re:Machine machine? by puck71 · · Score: 1

    Like it or not, that's what many, many people call it. If enough people say it, it becomes right, even if it's wrong. I kinda think it sounds silly. Oh well.

  72. Re:Offtopic: Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is slashdot being lame as usual, and trying to make a point (and failing miserably - as usual)

  73. Silver and gold by e-gold · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are certificates for both (or were, that is). The gold one I saw was orange. A good book is Money by James Ewart, lots of fun photos of old US money.
    JMR

    --
    Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  74. It's also ironic... by uradu · · Score: 1

    ...that an organization named after a famous European inventor would choose to focus solely on American accomplishments. Also ironic is that the sole non-American achievement on the list--the Smartcard, with two token paragraphs devoid of much detail--is also the least important concerning money in America. Of course, the thing with any Greatest-Of lists is that you can define the criteria and historic cut-off points to your own choosing.

    The glorious achievements on this list can nevertheless not negate the fact that banking in the US sucks more than in most of the industrialized world. In what other country do financial transactions rely on glorified IOU's--hand-signed checks--to the extent that they do in this country? What other country is so far behind in the acceptance of electronic transactions, such as direct deposit and debit, inter-bank transfers, etc? I guess when things suck so bad, it's always soothing to look back in history.

  75. Re:Machine machine? by Mengoxon · · Score: 1
    The author of the original article is not much better:

    The social impact of the credit card cannot be under-estimated.
  76. Even funnier.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact that this guy is modded "redundant" for pointing out a redundancy

  77. The immortality of Gold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The gold standard "fixes" nothing in any real sense. Gold is a commodity like any other. Its value changes over time depending on the degree to which people want it. The quantity also changes. People still dig the stuff out of the ground. This changes the supply and hence the value according to neoclassical economic theory."

    Gold however does have a very important, and useful property (several actually). It is universally accepted, both in a present sense, and historically. Countries (and their fiat monies) come and go, but gold is still there, and accepted. It's permanence (durability, most paper money will not last a 1,000 years). It also makes it much more difficult for governments to play monetary games. (the one's that end up hurting us all, usually). The quantity thing is actually good, because it reduces the effects of hoarding (like say in Fort Knox, or it's equivalent).

    1. Re:The immortality of Gold. by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      The immortality of Gold

      I seriously read that as "the immorality of gold" the first two times I saw it :)

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    2. Re:The immortality of Gold. by Walter+Wart · · Score: 1

      Gold may be "accepted" but that doesn't really mean much. Like I said, it has a price based on current market conditions. It can be converted into other currencies, but so can a lot of other things which are subject to exactly the same sort of market forces.

      As for lasting 1000 years, well, I suppose it does. But that isn't terribly relevant here. After all, how many people or governments for that matter, last anywhere near that long or plan even 50 years ahead?

      The monetary games you speak of are not necessarily bad. Monetary and fiscal policy are as old as government and can be applied wisely or foolishly. Applied well they can be the salvation of a national economy. A reflexive and religious belief that the government can do no right and will almost certainly screw up is not supported by history any more than tha belief that The Market will make the "right" decision.

      Gold's chief value is talismanic. It has a magical hold over peoples' imaginations. That superstition, in the most nice and accurate sense of the word, give gold a certain value. But I question how important it is.

      --
      The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
  78. ATM History (Thank the Dallas Cowboys) by SoVi3t · · Score: 3, Interesting

    June 27, 1967...Barclay's Bank installs the first "Barclaycash" in England. It could only handle withdrawls, and was intended for use in emergencies when the bank was closed. An American (BJ Meredith) saw it, and was amazed at why it wasn't already in the States. He and his younger brother (Don Meredith, Dallas Cowboys quarterback) put some money together, and founded Docutel, Inc. In November 1971, they installed the world's first fully automated teller machine; a Docutel Total Teller (TT) 300, in the lobby of Atlanta's Citizens & Southern National Bank. Unfortunately customers didn't know what they were, or how to use them. Finally, First National Bank of Atlanta installed one, painted it red, and called it Tillie the All-Time Teller, and spent over half a million dollars advertising it. It made headlines all over the country. By 1977, Docutel was a $31 million company. Unfortunately, competition grew, and Docutel rushed a new model (the TT2000), in September of 1977. The buttons stuck, the machine ate cards like they were candy, and the computer overloaded after several hours of use. Plus it was larger than the previous model, so banks had to knock bigger holes in the walls to replace older models. Docutel's market share plummeted from 80% to 27%. In 1982, they merged with a company named Olivetti, but even that didn't help. In 1986, they threw in the towel. They changed the banking world forever, but never survived long enough to cash in on the world they had created.

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
    1. Re:ATM History (Thank the Dallas Cowboys) by weave · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that history lesson. I remember my first experiences with ATM machines. Was around 1976-1978 time period. I do believe it was docutel or diabold. There were dedicated function buttons, like one for $25 cash, $50 cash, $100 cash. The money was dispensed in individual envelopes into a drawer, $25 per envelope.

  79. Balloon money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also as I mentioned in another post. It makes governmental financial games more difficult. I'm certain we all are familiar with "living beyound one's means" (hence the deficit we all currently enjoy). Well with present fiat money, if one runs up a debt, and has trouble paying it? A government can always print more fiat money to pay those debts (within limits e.g. Inflation). With the gold standard, while one can have a bit of give either way from one's base. One can't go too far (gotta pay those debts someway). So instead of a ballooning debt in the trillions, it's more like billions, or millions. Fiscal responsability starts with restraint.

  80. Missed one-stock market by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    The "second," "third," and "fourth" markets of the Stock Exachage came about in the 1900s. These revolutionized the speed at which transactions took place and took the Stock exchanges to a new level of internationality. Without these their would not be trillions of dollars in the stock markets today in America alone...

  81. The "ATM IS BROKEN" Scam by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    sounds familiar to a scam my brother tried a few times. Can't remember where he heard about it, but he would dress like a security guard, and sit outside a bank, late at night, put an "OUT OF ORDER" sign on the atm, and when people came up, he stated that if they wanted to make a deposit. If they said yes, he said that they were to put it into the large metal box he had brought with him. He could typically make about $1000+ in no time ;)

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  82. Debit Cards? Where ??? by rtrifts · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is a uniquely Canadian perspective, seeing as we have adopted the Debit card more pervasively than anybody else, but our major contribution to money is quite simple: we use less of it than anybody else on the planet.

    There isn't a store around anymore that does not take a debit card. You have to SEARCH WITH DETERMINATION for a store that does not take a debit card in Canada.

    Deboit Card: your ATM bank card and same pin number swi[ed at the check out - you tap in PIN at a hand held terminal - you leave.

    --
    .Robert
    1. Re:Debit Cards? Where ??? by jo42 · · Score: 1


      Sorry to say, the Yanks have this technology as well...

  83. The immortality of Gold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "As for lasting 1000 years, well, I suppose it does. But that isn't terribly relevant here. After all, how many people or governments for that matter, last anywhere near that long or plan even 50 years ahead?"

    Actually that's very relevent. For example, I can say accumilate a quantity of gold, and upon my death, pass it to my descendents. And so forth and so on(1). Irrespective of any government, past or present, or future (hence one of the reasons governments don't like it). What Linux brings to the individual, gold also brings to the individual. Freedom from the overwrought control that others exert on us. Be they corporations, or governments (2).

    "The monetary games you speak of are not necessarily bad. Monetary and fiscal policy are as old as government and can be applied wisely or foolishly. Applied well they can be the salvation of a national economy. A reflexive and religious belief that the government can do no right and will almost certainly screw up is not supported by history any more than tha belief that The Market will make the "right" decision."

    Well I could do a little word substitution, and say that the opposite is just as true. The only constant is that there's a middle ground in there somewere.

    "Gold's chief value is talismanic. It has a magical hold over peoples' imaginations. That superstition, in the most nice and accurate sense of the word, give gold a certain value. But I question how important it is."

    I wouldn't brush that off quite so readily, if I were you. That's one of the things that helps ensure longjevity, and desirability. Belief is never a force to be ignored.

    (1) Arrr! Were's me' buried treasure of gold? :)
    (2) Maybe when we get that "Star Trek" economy. Then the individual will both have that much freedom, and no longer need gold. But then again, societies fall.

    I should also add that gold fits better in a barter system, which if you remember predates the present system, and all societies that degenerate back revert to barter. A nice constant.

  84. MasterCARD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    American Express and MasterCard became huge successes overnight, and by the mid-'70s, Congress had to begin regulation of the credit card industry by banning such practices as the mass mailing of active cards to those who had not requested them.

    Somehow I vaguely remember Mastercard was called MasterCharge when I was a wee tyke. Can anyone confirm?

    1. Re:MasterCARD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. And Visa used to the the BankAmericard for Bank of America, now NationsBank.

    2. Re:MasterCARD? by legojenn · · Score: 1

      and Visa was called Chargex.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
  85. No, the money market... by hughk · · Score: 1

    Stock markets are important but not directly to money itself. What is more important is the establishment of the international money markets. This could only happen with the existance of one other piece of technology, the telephone.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:No, the money market... by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      IIRC, that would be the "Second market."

  86. Smart cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To everyone spouting nonsense like "smart cards are insecure - I used to hack my phone card", "why we should jump at -every- new technology", "smart cards never amounted to everything" etc, etc. Read the documents at EMVCo website and see for yourself which technology is used in such cards. Also, the point of EMV smart cards is not storing some amount of digital cash on it. The main point is avoiding fraudulent transaction repudiation (as each transaction carries digital signature called transaction certificate you can't claim that you didn't make a transaction when in fact you did) and the ability to make transactions offline (using offline PIN code). So at least in Europe both VISA and Mastercard are phasing out the magnetic stripe cards.

  87. Money printing by losttoy · · Score: 1

    How come technology changes in money printing like watermarks don't count??

  88. Well go on by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    Which country?

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Well go on by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      I don't want to compromise me or my country.

      Extreme cowardness and capital punishment is the American way, no thank you.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    2. Re:Well go on by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

      In other news, CausticWindow killed my entire family, shot my dog, ran a bus full of orphans and widows off the road in his full-speed get away, and doesn't tip at restaurants.

      Proof? I don't want to compromise myself.

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    3. Re:Well go on by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      Don't give me any ideas you worthless American.

      I can't find any sources right now, but it is a matter of fact (unless the newspapers I've read are lying) that several countries have been denied withdrawal of their gold from the reserves in the US. Since the introduction of FIAT money, these withdrawals are perfectly justifiable, but the US don't want to hear of it.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    4. Re:Well go on by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

      Well... first of all, I'm German by birth.

      Secondly, I'm not mocking the idea that it is possible that some countries were denied withdrawal from the federal reserve.

      What I'm mocking is your "I have to protect myself and my country by not saying which country was wronged."

      And threatening my poor dog is less than a positive point.

      --
      With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
  89. Yes by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    Someone else pointed that out (but you were a tactful about it, which makes all the difference) I don't know whether or not it's changed since 9/11 though.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  90. As simple as... by linca · · Score: 1
    digitial money is as simple as figuring out what the ATM told the smart card to make it say it had more money.

    Which in turn is as simple as breaking RSA. Because that is what's encrypting the communication between the ATM and the smart card.

  91. Amazing by scottme · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to say I find it odd that every single one of these inventions was made in the U.S.A.

    Many other countries have significant financial institutions that are equally, or arguably more, sophisticated.

    I don't have the timem or for that matter the inclination to research this myself, but I'd have thought that at least one out of any top ten money technology inventions would have had a non-U.S. origin.

  92. Big things that failed by mlush · · Score: 1
    We often wonder about the technologies that didn't make it onto the radar screen - the big things that simply faded from existence before they were able to get any real market feedback.

    If these things faded from existence they probably were not that big in the first place. I wish they had provided some examples they would be as interesting as the successes

  93. RSA patent history inorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite what the article says, an RSA patent was applied for in the UK, but failed because of prior use at GCHQ (the British equivalent of the American NSA). For some reason, GCHQ had forgotten to broadcast it's discovery. There's more details at:
    http://www.churchill91.freeserve.co.uk/crypto /code s/cc8.htm (I'm not connected with that site).

  94. Electronic Cash Registers by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative
    Electronic, as opposed to electrical, cash registers did not appear until cheap microprocessors became available. The older registers were mechanical or electro-mechanical. It was the age of the precision machine. Calculators, cash registers, typewriters and teletypes were mechanical devices with large numbers of parts. National Cash Register was the dominant company in the cash register business.

    I can remember going to the department store with my mother back in that era. The department store used special models of cash registers that were huge and had many more buttons than a normal cash register. They also had a pneumatic tube system to send paperwork from one department to another.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Electronic Cash Registers by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      MMMMmmmmMmMmmMM, pneumatic tube. One of my personal goals in life is, once I get into a house that I figure I'll be living in long enough for it to be worth while, is to make a pneumatic tube system.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  95. Monkey Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, my eyes are going. I could have sworn I read that as "Monkey" instead of "Money". I thought it was about an infinite number of them, all posting /. articles.

  96. Not so surprising as that. by dacap · · Score: 1

    Clearly, you have never had to deal with collection agencies! :-)

    --
    English -- gotta love it! / The engineers refuse to refuse the rocket until the refuse is removed from the launch pad.
  97. morons refuse top 10 takeknowledgee payoffs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cyphering how many babies it costs for a barroll of crudeness, we've just cut back, a lot.

    as for linus, the whoreabull Godless thieving/murdering georgewellian fuddites may have met their match there. you know what happens to the good guys, right?

    we've saved 1000's, if not 10's of 1000's of $, buy not buying into the payper liesense hostage ransom stock markup execrable such as is distributed buy the felonious kingdumb & IT's naykid furor et AL.

    no matter. the #1 task is planet/population rescue. the lights are coming up. we're in crisis mode. you can help.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creator. more breathing. vote with yOUR wallet. seek others of non-aggressive intentions/behaviours. that's the spirit, moving you.

    pay no heed to the greed/fear based walking dead.

    each harmed innocent carries with it a bad toll. it will be repaid by you/us. the Godless felons will not be available to make reparations.

    pay attention. that's definitely affordable, plus you might develop skills which could prevent you from being misled any further by phonIE ?pr? ?firm? generated misinformation.

    good work so far. there's still much to be done. see you there.

  98. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by isorox · · Score: 1

    Star Trek TNG, the replicator mostly eliminates the scarce resources of the scarce resources/infinite wants connundrum. Couple with an efficent automated service industry, where no one needs to work, and you get people working just for the fun of it (Siskos dad, Picards family).

    Of course there are problems, there is always only x hectares of sea front land, and its arguable that TNG is a soviet-style commumism combined with a left wing politically correct "idealism". Theres arguments either way.

    On the micro scale, most families and small communities on Earth have a commumistic view, with no internal trade, and communal ownership. It's interesting too see the economies that sprung up in POW camps though, where cigarettes were used as money.

    A commumist economy could work with mind control too, be it subtle (subliminal advertising), or obvious (marxism + slavery)

  99. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by isorox · · Score: 1

    Nah, he can seek help from me, I only charge $50 an hour to sad deluded slashdot leftwingers.

  100. A little before *that* by Gregoyle · · Score: 1

    From the Constitution of the United States:

    Section 10. No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.

    There was, in fact, great debate in the constitutional convention about allowing even the federal government the right to mint fiat money.

    From Madison's notes from the constitutional convention:

    MR. GORHAM [Mass.] had doubts on the subject. Congress, he thought, would not have the power unless it was expressed. Though he had a mortal hatred to paper money, yet, as he could not foresee all emergencies, he was unwilling to tie the hands of the legislature. He observed the late war could not have been carried on had such a prohibition existed. (1)

    The general consensus was that while it was distasteful, paper money might prove necessary in the event of another war (as it had in the war for independence). However, the founders wanted to stop individual states from printing money not backed in specie to stop what had happened during the war with hugely different values of state currencies.

    (1) From Edward Flaherty's paper "Debunking the Federal Reserve Conspiracy Theories (and other financial myths)"

    --

    "He's more machine now than man, twisted and evil."

  101. New World by Detritus · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere that the Spanish discovery and exploitation of the New World resulted in massive inflation in the Spanish economy.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:New World by khallow · · Score: 1

      I'm not certain how bad the inflation was, but this indeed was a problem. It was made much worse IMHO by the concentration of the new wealth with the nobility. It's not much of a problem if the gold supply doubles, but everyone's gold holdings double as well, and a big problem when that new gold is all in the hands of a few people. Admittedly, the Spanish conquistadors wouldn't have looted that gold without the ample assistance and military power of the Crown. So I guess the Crown "deserved" a cut of the spoils.

  102. Re:Octopus: Hong Kong smart card - Re:Excuse me, b by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why hasn't anyone rolled this out in the US?

    Our money system is controlled by a bunch of religious freaks who believe they are God's Chosen People and the rest of us are scum to be enslaved. Every money transaction in the country includes a fee that goes to said oppressors. Such a system as you propose would be the beginning of the end for these people.

    We are speaking of Jews.

    Today, only East Asia represents a serious threat to International Jewry. The entire Western World is within their vicegrip. I only hope that further inventions in money systems come from China and Japan, as eventually the Jews will not be able to fight the demand.

  103. ATM MACHINE? by MikeDataLink · · Score: 1


    Who else get's annoyed when someone says "Automatic Teller Machine" Machine?

    --
    Mike @ The Geek Pub. Let's Make Stuff!
  104. Electronics vs Electical by jeepliberty · · Score: 1
    I too thought they were very liberal in using the term electronic for devices prior to the invention of the transistor.

    As far as "Electronic money" being invented in 1918, I would think wire transfers with Western Union would beat this date by decades.

    My first experience with credit cards was on a family vacation in the early 60's when my father used his Gulf Oil card at Holiday Inns on a summer vacation.

  105. My List by Lucas+Membrane · · Score: 2, Funny

    10. Tote boards
    9. Tollbooths
    8. Pay toilets
    7. Collect calls
    6. 900 numbers
    5. Ponzi
    4. Disney dollars
    3. The mill
    2. Raleigh coupons

    And, the greatest monetary technology of the
    20th century ...

    1. The 7-cent nickel (Groucho Marx)

  106. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good thing this is reality instead of star trek.

  107. #1 with a bullet: THE FED by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1
    No other institution created during the twentieth century has done more to dilute, distribute, weaken and generally debase money in our society like the Federal Reserve. I am absolutely amazed this has not been mentioned.

    The Fed has the legal right to create money out of thin air. This is the magical force behind your stock market bubbles, precious metals market movements, and debt of all kinds.

  108. Re:Octopus: Hong Kong smart card - Re:Excuse me, b by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    In Hong Kong we use a smart card (stored value card) called the Octopus...Why hasn't anyone rolled this out in the US?

    Because Hong Kong is a city and the US a a large nation. If you look at individual US cities, you'll find numerous similar systems (though most are mag-stripe).

    I suspect it may also be because in the US there is already a large installed base of mag-stripe reader based systems. Inertia is hard to overcome.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  109. Re:TLA ABREVIATION abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    furthermore, if you say it as a word it's an acronym, if you say the letters it's just an abbreviation

  110. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by isorox · · Score: 1

    indeed, however trek (specifically replicators, space travel and holodecks) is the only semi-realistic way commumism would work on a large scale, by eliminating limited resources.

    The only other way is eliminating infinite wants - which involves some form of mind control and restrictions on freedom, basically marxism.

  111. other inventions by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I'd add
    (11) The electronic computer and internet. These are general and rapidly evolving inventions that continually change he way money is processed.
    (12) Electronic trading. New money is created as the value of stocks and bonds increase. Electronic trading has made it nearly as possible for the individual to trade as fast as the big institution.
    (13) Micro payments. Though this hasn't caught on yet, sub-cent payments will smooth internet trasactions of the future. Everything now on the net is expensive (a dollar or more) or free (portals, music, email). Either the vendor or ucstomer gets screwed in one of these cases. Micro-payments, e.g one-cent news stories, one-cent email, etc. are a solutions. As computers nad networks grow ever cheaper, so does the overhead of a sub-cent transaction.
    (14) Computer auctions. A profitable sale creates money. Companies like EBay create both huge and tiny markets by connecting large pools of buyers and sellers. Auctioning tends to result in higher prices paid.

  112. U.S. money is more biodegradable by alienmole · · Score: 1

    The U.S. fabric-based bills are more biodegradable - that's why you don't see much money lying around in the streets. I bet in Australia, after a while there'll just be indestructible plastic money lying all over the place, the kangaroos won't be able to graze any more, and it'll be a mess!

  113. Re: Truth about smart cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smart cards have no software. They have firmware, but there is no operating system that needs "rebooting" as someone noted earlier.

    Also, the reason smart card adoption is higher in Europe is that landline telecommunication is far more expensive than in the US. With smart cards, merchants have a cheaper way of accepting credit card payments. Typically, the smart card will authenticate the token (card) itself, then payments will be submitted in automated fashion in batch form at days end or over any period.

  114. These are all AAP pleonasms by alienmole · · Score: 1
    These are all examples of AAP pleonasms. "AAP" stands for Acronym-Assisted Pleonasm. A pleonasm is a redundant phrase. If you use AAP pleonasms a lot, you may suffer from PNS syndrome, also known as RAS syndrome. PNS stands for PIN-Number Syndrome; RAS stands for Redundant Acronym Syndrome. RAS Syndrome actually seems to be the most commonly-used term for it, but AAP pleonasm sounds more impressive.

    It seems that people like to use real nouns, using the acronym as a kind of modifier or qualifier of the noun. It's been suggested that this happens more in English, where common nouns don't frequently appear at the beginning of a sentence. Note that even someone with RAS Syndrome wouldn't normally use a sentence like "HTTP protocol is slow", whereas they might say "HTTP is slow". But if the acronym is moved further along in the sentence, it's more likely to be used with a redundant noun: "The HTTP protocol is slow".

    Any grammarians who can explain this better, please step in.

  115. One of the great driving factors in technology by djh101010 · · Score: 1

    ...and the other is warfare.

  116. 100 years of change by djh101010 · · Score: 1

    Er, because it predates the last 100 years, I would guess.

    1. Re:100 years of change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And money printing hasn't seen any other changes in technology in the last 100 years??

  117. Historic piece? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The piece may be about 'historic' developments in money technology, but the piece itself could only rightly be called 'historical.'

  118. Enron was a great invention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enron was a great invention...
    for the people running the scam.

  119. underestimated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The article states that the social impact of the credit card "cannot be under-estimated." That means that however little importance one attributes to it, one will not have erred in assigning too little. The more usual phrase, more likely reflective of the author's intent, is "cannot be overstated." Perhaps he had in mind "should not be underestimated."

  120. Re:ABOLISH MONEY!!! by siskbc · · Score: 1
    communism isn't about bartering. It's about having a gift economy, where people of the world don't need to put their faith in bits of paper with numbers printed on them, or bits on a disk/card, they put their faith in other humans.

    For your sake I hope you're trolling.

    Impossible? No.

    Perhaps you're unfamiliar with human nature. "Pay it forward" doesn't work outside the movie. People are greedy. People are motivated by the possibility of enhancing their own enjoyment in life. In general, people aren't motivated by kindness. Anything else is a pipe dream. And I mean that in the "whatcha smokin'" sense.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  121. Smart Cards??? get real. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    They put Smart Codes up solely on speculation. They admitted they are of limited use now, but personally think that they will become valuable in the future.

    This makes me wonder about their judgement in general. I personally would have included Mutual Funds, a concept that got a LOT more people involved in the Stock Market.

    I am not impressed by their article.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  122. I went to something like this in London once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just googled and found it at www.digitalmoneyforum.com

  123. Local Lingo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if it is a Canadianism or more local than that, but myself and people I know here in Vancouver just call them "Bank Machines." Literature from the bank might refer to them as ATMs or as Automatic Tellers. "ATM Machine" isn't something I hear very much here.

    1. Re:Local Lingo by jolyonr · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK, they're called "cash machines" or "cash points" or just the "hole in the wall" Jolyon

      --


      Please read my Canon EOS tech blog at http://www.everyothershot.com
  124. What about Stock? by tjstork · · Score: 1


    Without the notion of investor capital and publicly traded ownership of corporations, our lives would be radically different.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:What about Stock? by gtshafted · · Score: 1

      wasn't that already around before the 1900's?

  125. Re:Octopus: Hong Kong smart card - Re:Excuse me, b by bailster · · Score: 1

    Cool, which cities? What can you do with it?

    --
    ...