Slashdot Mirror


Roomba Competitor Slightly Lacking

tivojafa writes "Following hot on the heels of the Roomba vacuum cleaner, TV Products (USA) Inc have released the "RoboSweep" - "The intelligent sweeper that sweeps while you rest!". Roomba by iRobot is an engineering masterpiece with 15 sensors and 5 motors to navigate and clean the floors. It has been stripped apart and there are rumors of a replacement processor so it can be used as a general purpose robot platform. Now the RoboSweep "intelligent" sweeper has redefined intelligence (or lack of it) - the internals have got to be seen to be believed." Very funny.

266 comments

  1. Please stop building robots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    First they're cleaning carpets of dirt, next they'll be cleaning Earth of humans!

    1. Re:Please stop building robots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new vacuum cleaner overlords.

    2. Re:Please stop building robots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, this is the type of thing that always ends in tears.

    3. Re:Please stop building robots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ObReply:

      I'd like to remind them that as a trusted Slashdot personality, I can be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground robotic maintenance centers.

    4. Re:Please stop building robots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like the RoboSweep is a robot broom, not a robot vacuum cleaner. How can it be compared with a Roomba? They're in very different market secotrs.

    5. Re:Please stop building robots! by vuud · · Score: 1


      Your the same bastard that was welcoming our new robot blimp masters! Where did that get you pal? Nowhere you stinkin collaborator!

      Shame, shame on you!

  2. High Tech Design by DrLudicrous · · Score: 4, Funny
    "After another minute I was so bored that I picked it up to see what it had done... the wipe was completely clean but it was starting to push dirt in front of it. The ground clearance is so low that the dirt can't go under it to reach the wipe!"

    Now that's what I call quality engineering. And I love the analog 'processor'!

    1. Re:High Tech Design by stuffman64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh, and how about that artificial intelligence claimed in its ads. Heck, this site even goes out of the way to say that in bold letters.

      These guys should be sued for misleading advertising. Do a search for "robosweep" on Google (or just click here) Isn't it funny how all of the sites use the same exact wording? Who exactly runs this whole "As Seen on TV" thing anyways? Caveat Emptor!

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
  3. seems like an easy project by onya · · Score: 5, Funny

    One motor.
    One battery tray.
    One switch.
    One power socket.
    One LED.
    A few wires.

    soo... who's going to be the first to get linux running on it?

    1. Re:seems like an easy project by EinarH · · Score: 5, Interesting
      soo... who's going to be the first to get linux running on it?
      For all that we know it could allready be running Linux.

      iRobot also makes the PackBot, a unmanned robust robot for reconnaissance operations in urban terrain.
      The robot is developed for the US Military, its DARPA founded, and it runs Linux.

      More info here

      Through the Tactical Mobile Robotics Program (TMR), the PackBot mobile robot got a new rugged hardware housing that supported significantly more substantial electronics. In fact, the new processor and motherboard booted a Linux kernel in under 12 seconds - just turn on and go! With such substantial computing on-board, the first robot operating system AWARE(TM) was born.

      Personally I find this far more interesting than this "sweeper".

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    2. Re:seems like an easy project by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      The parent poster was talking about the knockoff RoboSweep toy, not the Roomba.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    3. Re:seems like an easy project by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      itll be a while yet, but there is already BSD port... ...which just goes to further my theory - Germans love David Hassle - wait wait, i mean BSD runs on everything!

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    4. Re:seems like an easy project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mv /dirt /bin?
      s/dirty/clean/

      Any more stupid "If it ran Linux" jokes?

    5. Re:seems like an easy project by uncoveror · · Score: 1
      The Robosweep is so lame that no one will adopt one as a pet as so many have with Roomba.

      Smythe has a Roomba robotic vacuum which he calls "Scruffy", just like it was a real dog. He even puts dirt down for it from time to time, and imagines that he is feeding his "pet".

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    6. Re:seems like an easy project by kaytea2k · · Score: 1

      Looks more like the prop from a weirded out 80's SCI-FI flick

    7. Re:seems like an easy project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's so sad.

    8. Re:seems like an easy project by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Funny
      Wow, amazing the number of people who don't even read the post and realize that you're not talking about the Roomba.

      If anyone actually manages to get Linux running on the RoboSweep, the only way they'd be able to one-up themselves is if they got it to run on a broom.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    9. Re:seems like an easy project by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      RoboSweep toy,
      Actually, you hit it on the head. That exact mechanism has been around since at least 1966, when a little toy locomotive used to terrorize mmy three-year-old self at my grandparents' house. It used exactly that same mechanism.
      Now, that said, if you outfitted a machine with such a drive, equipped with an effective vacuum cleaner mechanism and an infinite supply of electricity, and let it run forever, it would eventually remove a significant portion of the dirt in a small unobstructed circular room. The problem with such mechanisms is that they tend to find certain ... "resonances"? in a room, particularly if there are things such as chair legs, in the way. I took the aforementioned toy, once I understood how it worked, and set it in the utility room with a little book, to see how long it took to get to the book. After a half hour or so, as its batteries were dying, I realized that it was spending most of its time spirographing away in two corners.

    10. Re:seems like an easy project by tim_bissell · · Score: 1


      >> soo... who's going to be the first to get linux running on it?

      > For all that we know it could allready be running Linux.


      No way! If it were running Linux it would cost $699 !

    11. Re:seems like an easy project by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1

      I think someone needs to find some friends.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    12. Re:seems like an easy project by orasio · · Score: 1

      If you had RTFA, you would know that the article was supposed to be funny, as the RoboSweep is a toy, not a robot, lacking a processor where you could run Linux.

    13. Re:seems like an easy project by SuDZ · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a job for MacGyver.

      SuDZ

    14. Re:seems like an easy project by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

      Plenty of room inside for a mobo.

  4. You brought it on yourself by tangledweb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here is an idea for an ask slashdot thread:

    "Have you ever bought anything off an infomercial and been happy with it?"

    I cannot see why you would sell anything that way if it would sell in normal outlets.

    1. Re:You brought it on yourself by Synithium · · Score: 5, Funny

      George Forman grill. Bought it off TV way before it was in the stores. And you know what? It still kicks ass like a prize fighter.

      Thank you George!

    2. Re:You brought it on yourself by shaitand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because it's hard to get into normal stores, anyone with a few bucks can get long national infomercial advertising.

    3. Re:You brought it on yourself by Ark42 · · Score: 1

      I was about to agree that all the TV crap sucks but I have a George Forman grill as well, and while I got mine at Meijer, it did start as an informercial didn't it. Obviously became successful enough to be carried in real stores though.

    4. Re:You brought it on yourself by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just got mine about 2 weeks ago at local K-Mart. Kicks MUCH ass. Saves energy. Cooks quick. This thing has got fast food beat big time.

    5. Re:You brought it on yourself by sremick · · Score: 1

      Actually, I got one of those black thawing plates that used to be advertised on infomercials. I picked it up at Ames which used to have a bunch of shelves for older "As Seen on TV" items.

      Believe it or not, it actually works great. I think it's the black coating or something... helps the heat-transfer. Whatever. It works, and I still use it. Worth the $9 or whatever I spent on it.

    6. Re:You brought it on yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish the grilling surface was removable. Would make it a lot easier to clean.

    7. Re:You brought it on yourself by Caeda · · Score: 1

      And if you'd gone anywhere but k-mart, you'd have found about 15 copy brands that cost about 1/3 as much and do exactly the same thing. :) I bought one of the copies and its great.. same size as the largest George Forman Grill they make. only $14.

      --
      ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
    8. Re:You brought it on yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 insightful.

    9. Re:You brought it on yourself by kuroth · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's not exactly a new design. Before the "cooks everything" folding grills came along, they were smaller and called "pocket sandwich grills". I have one in my basement that's at least 15 or 20 years old.

      Holy crap, what happened to my youth?

      *ahem* excuse me.

      Anyhoo, someone in marketing finally figured out what many college students already knew: you could cook a hamburger, a steak, or even bacon in one of those little grills. Make it a little bigger, a little hotter, and come up with a better way to get the grease out (previously "pour onto your hands"), and you have a can't-miss product.

      And then, you add George Foreman to the mix? Wow, I say. Wow, indeed.

      Keep in mind that getting Mr. Foreman's endorsement probably wasn't all that much of a challenge. You're talking about a guy who named all 268 of his sons "George Foreman". Getting him to sign on probably didn't involve any negotiations beyond, "Its name is also George Foreman."

    10. Re:You brought it on yourself by GigsVT · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You're talking about a guy who named all 268 of his sons "George Foreman".

      The hilarious part to this is that he has sold the use of the name "George Foreman", in perpetuity, to Salton, Inc for 110 million dollars.

      Dumb boxer ain't so dumb, eh? :) I sold my Salton stock after finding that out. I don't guess his Sons will mind too much that he sold their soul, especially if the republicans get their way with the inheritance tax.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    11. Re:You brought it on yourself by whatch+durrin · · Score: 1
      Didn't buy it off TV, but picked it up from Wal-Mart a while after...

      The "Quick Chop." It works very well for chopping up any variety of things: herbs, nuts, veggies...

      I think I paid US$10 for it and it was well worth it.

      --
      ***
      Radio Shack. You've got questions...we've got blank stares(TM).
    12. Re:You brought it on yourself by Champaign · · Score: 1

      My uncle bought a self-inflating bed. We all thought he was a big sucker, but everytime there's more people in the house than beds, we pull the sucker out, plug it in, and it auto-magically inflates. Comfortable, tough and durable, its well worth the price (~$200)... I'm planning on buying one myself.

    13. Re:You brought it on yourself by chad_r · · Score: 1

      The Animusic DVD is pretty cool. I had seen it on Tech TV's Eye Drops before, but my spouse saw the infomercial and bought it.

    14. Re:You brought it on yourself by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      "Have you ever bought anything off an infomercial and been happy with it?"

      Yes. Twice.

      I bought the Miracle Blade III knife set for my wife (who is a chef by profession). Very sharp, very effective. Not commercial grade, but well above standard consumer grade.

      I also bought her a dehydrator. I figured this one was safe enough, since there is not much to a dehydrator (a set of racks with some air flow and a small heater element is just about it). The price was right, and it works well.

      I have seen a lot of shit advertised this way, but there is actual good stuff out there.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
    15. Re:You brought it on yourself by hagardtroll · · Score: 1

      Hardly a month goes by when I don't pull out my Flowbeee and give myself a trim.

    16. Re:You brought it on yourself by harrkev · · Score: 1
      Actually, I got one of those black thawing plates that used to be advertised on infomercials.

      Actually, you picked up a "heat sink," which also happens to work well as a "cold sink."

      The next time that you are tempted to use this, try this -- use a griddle or large frying pan instead. The metal conducts the cold away where the ambient room temperature can warm it up. I think that you will be surprised. And if you already have a large frying pan or griddle, then you can throw that thawing plate away and have a less cluttered kitchen.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    17. Re:You brought it on yourself by xThinkx · · Score: 1

      Remember the "egg-wave" product? Yeah, I got one as a gift, most useless thing ever.

      Not that it doesn't cook eggs in the microwave, but it takes about 3 dishwasher cycles to clean afterwards, and don't even think about washing it by hand. However after taking note of the concept of eggs in a microwave, I tried a different strategy, put eggs in a bowl, yep, works just the same, and the bowl cleans up a lot easier. STUPID infomercials.

      On the positive side, the George Foreman grill is a masterpiece, as many other geeks have mentioned.

      --
      Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
      "
    18. Re:You brought it on yourself by Vexar · · Score: 1
      I agree with the other George Foreman Grill purchasers, contact grilling really is fast. The no-stick kinda wore off of mine, but I can't buy a can of Teflon spray for that price, so who cares? Glorified waffle iron.

      On the other hand, who would buy anything electronic, even a toothbrush, from a business like that? My wife foolishly bought one of those zig-zag hand-chopper cylinder things. What a waste. You pound on it forever, stun your palm/wrist, make a terrible racket, and you have enough room for one small apple in there. Spend an extra $7 and buy a low-end Hamilton Beach food processor.

      This Roomba reminds me of the iMow (from Toro, although it's really from Friendly Machines, and just has their marketing team behind it). The iMow does its job in several hours, which could be done with a 4Hp gas mower in maybe 15 minutes. It gets stuck if you don't have an even surface, and lacks any real performance power to handle the odd fallen twigs. Still, it does work unattended. If you figure out where it gets stuck, and attend to that problem area, it is useful, but some yards, or in this case, some rooms, will never work out.

      What they really need is a robot that can do vacuuming on stairs. Maybe they could make it out of a slinky?

    19. Re:You brought it on yourself by NickFitz · · Score: 1

      How to make an impression on your guests: "I'll just plug your bed in."

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    20. Re:You brought it on yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The George Foreman grill was pretty good, but they have some alternatives today that IMO are better. Amazon sells two versions of a Hamilton Beach contact grill that has removable grilling plates that you can put into the dishwasher. Suzanne Somers has something similar from HSN.com. And Wolfgang Puck has a pannini maker that has a superior hinge, although like the GF, the grids are not removeable. No offense, but trying to hold the old style grills over the sink and get the grilling plates really clean is not the best way to cook.

    21. Re:You brought it on yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, The metal conducts heat from the room into the cold object in the pan. Warm flows to cold right? Cold is the *absence* of warmth(energy/movement), not the other way around. This reminds me of a story I read where a university professor gave a talk on 1 April one year about his theory of Dark, and how particles called "Darkons" made up a "flow of Dark" and how light was simply the absence of darkons, etc. The entire class listened attentively and dutifully took notes.....

    22. Re:You brought it on yourself by funbobby · · Score: 1

      You can also get similar beds now at the camping section in walmart that are almost as good and a lot cheaper. The main difference is that they don't have the pump attached, and they take longer to infate, but it will only cost you about fifty or sixty bucks for the bed and the pump. Also, the ones on TV come with a mattress pad. This actually turns out to be important because the inflatable bed can get cold. So if you buy the cheap one, use a mattress pad, or even better some egg crate foam.

    23. Re:You brought it on yourself by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Well I doubt all his male descendants will be called George Foreman.

      --
    24. Re:You brought it on yourself by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you are saying he is planning on having more kids? He already has 10, the 5 sons and 5 daughters. All the sons are named George Foreman.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  5. Simple by 2starr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sometimes the simplest solution is the best. Probably not in this case though. :-P

    --

    "Let your heart soar as high as it will. Refuse to be average." - A. W. Tozer

    1. Re:Simple by kfx · · Score: 1

      The simplest solution is the best. Unfortunately, The RoboSweep is all simple and no solution.

  6. been done... by jayratch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had a toy like this when I was a kid. I think we bought it at a flea market for like $15... although it didn't pretend to clean floors, it had a much cooler action robot head that moved its arms!

    1. Re:been done... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1
      My father had a toy wind-up car like this. You'd wind it up, set it on a table, and it wouldn't zoom around, never falling off.

      The way it worked was that between the two front wheels, it had a sideways wheel that was mounted slightly higher, so that it wouldn't touch the table. As soon as it got to the edge of the table, the normal wheels would slip off, and the sideways wheel would make contact, cause the car to make a turn, bringing it back on the table.

      --
      Say no to software patents.
  7. Intelligant? by dropoffx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This robo sweeper is about as intelligant as a can opener.

    --
    This space for rent. Contact for our rates.
  8. Nothing New Here by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I seem to remember having a toy car as a kid that worked much the same way.

    There are, however, a few key differences:

    RoboSweep is
    - more expensive
    - slower
    - less fun

    And with almost no innards, it's not even fun to bash to pieces, Office Space style!

    Be very careful when you see that "As Seen On TV!" logo.

  9. When I was a kid... by djkitsch · · Score: 2, Informative

    About 15 years ago you could get "robots" that were EXACTLY the same as this - all they've done is stuck a few bits of Velcro on the bottom! Great injection moulded case too - very faux-sophisticated.

    I think my childhood toy cost about $10...

    --
    sig:- (wit >= sarcasm)
    1. Re:When I was a kid... by minion · · Score: 1

      About 15 years ago you could get "robots" that were EXACTLY the same as this - all they've done is stuck a few bits of Velcro on the bottom! Great injection moulded case too - very faux-sophisticated.

      I think my childhood toy cost about $10...


      Do you have any idea how much it costs to warehouse 10,000 robot toys? Thats why it now costs $39.95

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
  10. Argh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdotted already. Anyone wants to get a mirror up?

  11. /.ed to death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be kind on the robots, one day they will be your master.

  12. Mirror by jonman_d · · Score: 4, Informative

    The site was incredibly slow with no comments, so I figured I'd mirror it for a day here.

    Please be nice to it :P

    1. Re:Mirror by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, if yours goes down, I just copied it to a Tripod mirror. I won't take it down until who knows when... hopefully, it won't make anyone mad. Cheers!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:Mirror by cethiesus · · Score: 4, Informative

      A second.

      Be nice as well.

      --


      "Ford," he said, "you're turning into a penguin. Stop it."
    3. Re:Mirror by nerph · · Score: 1

      Apparently it made someone mad :)

    4. Re:Mirror by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Apparently it made someone mad :)

      I had wondered what the limits of a Tripod mirror would be. Looks like I found out!

      ALLOTMENT
      Total Bandwidth Allotted: 1.0 GB

      And the hourly stats - wow! Hittin' the links all night long! FYI, they appear to have an hourly limit of 5.7MB:

      7 pm: 0 KB
      8 pm: 603.9 KB
      9 pm: 8.2 MB
      10 pm: 10.2 MB

      11 pm: 5.3 MB
      12 am: 5.5 MB
      1 am: 8.2 MB
      2 am: 6.0 MB

      3 am: 3.3 MB
      4 am: 3.8 MB
      5 am: 3.6 MB
      6 am: 4.1 MB
      7 am: 4.2 MB
      8 am: 7.4 MB
      9 am: 1.3 MB
      10 am: tilt!

      So I've officially Slashdotted a site. Though it hardly counts, being a Tripod free account. But hey, gotta start somewhere!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  13. Sad attempt by rzbx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That has to be the saddest attempt at making a competing product. It uses nothing besides some gears to move around obstacles (no circuitry), uses wipes to clean floor (which don't work well according to website author, says it barely picks up dirt and it only does on the front of wipe), moves slowly, and obviously can't clean anything besides smooth surfaces. Is there a lamest products ever list? This really deserves it.

    --
    Question everything.
    1. Re:Sad attempt by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Is there a lamest products ever list?

      Only thing like that I know of is a list of the worst Mac software ever. Completely unrelated, but awfully amusing.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  14. had one as a kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember when I was a kid I had a number of battery powered cars which worked on a similar system, so that when they crashed into the kitchen cabinets (they wouldnt run on carpet only hard floors) they would change direction. I bet my dad still has them in his loft.... ahh memories.

  15. Flexible Frank by Etherwalk · · Score: 1
    It looks like Heinlein's dream came true. Finally, a robot to clean the floors for you. And we didn't even have to time travel.

    Remember to put the junk mail in front of the robot chute so that you get the babel fish, though.

    1. Re:Flexible Frank by LoadStar · · Score: 1
      Remember to put the junk mail in front of the robot chute so that you get the babel fish, though.

      The mail has to sit on the satchel in front of the robot chute, you have to cover up the drain, and you have to hang the dressing gown from the hook on the wall.

      I am SUCH a geek that I remember that.

  16. Re:Zero comments... by beerman2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well if you can't read the article, it basically says this robosweep thing is a piece of crap. It contains no electronics other then its motor (which apparently has barely enough power to drive the thing) and it works by mechanically shifting gears when it hits a wall so that it can turn. This in an of itself is not so terrible, but according the article the "robot" also doesn't have enough ground clearence for dirt to pass underneath so instead of actually picking up dirt it just pushes it around.

    Btw, if you take a look at the link to the ad you'll see some kind of dislcaimer at the bottom explaining how the Roomba is a registered trademark of iRobot and that the RoboSweep thing is not made or endorsed by iRobot. I though this was interesting since no where on thir page do they mention the Roomba except for in this disclaimer. I guess their product is so terrible they afraid of being accused of trying to make iRobot look bad.

  17. man that thing is too funny... by kendoka · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if the guy who designed that was a shyster or just an old-timer engineer who actually throught he could replace the ai with a differential...

    1. Re:man that thing is too funny... by kfx · · Score: 1

      He probably just figured that if it worked for most slashdotters, it could work for a sweeper... I guess he was wrong though.

  18. excellent marketing. by edrugtrader · · Score: 4, Funny

    "RoboSweep uses artificial intelligence to sweep your entire floor."

    yes. yes it does.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:excellent marketing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...if "Artificial Intelligence" means a total lack of anything remotely resembling real intelligence...

    2. Re:excellent marketing. by skaffen42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes. And it uses real stupidity as marketing tool. :)

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    3. Re:excellent marketing. by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      "RoboSweep uses artificial intelligence to sweep your entire floor."

      yes. yes it does.


      Reminds me of a guy I knew in high school who wrote an artificial intelligence program on his TRS-80 calculator. Something like:

      10 INPUT "Enter a concept":A$
      20 FOR I = 1 TO 100 : NEXT I
      30 PRINT "I understand."

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  19. I got one of these by ocie · · Score: 4, Funny

    I overclocked it and now it can clean my whole apartment in under 15 seconds. Of course I have to liquid cool it to keep the motors from melting.

    --
    JET Program: see Japan, meet intere
    1. Re:I got one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did your mom get that low Slashdot ID at your baby shower?

    2. Re:I got one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you mean you liquid-cooled your Roomba, or the apartment?

  20. Missing processor upgrade link by tivojafa · · Score: 1

    http://www.roombacommunity.com/forum/viewtopic.php ?t=24

    1. Re:Missing processor upgrade link by tivojafa · · Score: 1

      Third time lucky... link

  21. The intelligent Robosweep? by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has anyone ever actually expected quality out of a product that has a "As Seen On TV!" sticker on it?

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
    1. Re:The intelligent Robosweep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, those george foreman grills kick ass!

    2. Re:The intelligent Robosweep? by caferace · · Score: 3, Funny

      You obviously never purchased a Vanna White blow up doll, my friend.

    3. Re:The intelligent Robosweep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, it's an excellent grill. But it's one of the few good products I've seen on TV in a very long time. It's the exception to the rule.

    4. Re:The intelligent Robosweep? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I never have, yet my roommate at college had one of those little food chopper things, where you put the food ni a little cylinder, pound down on the top several times, and each time a series of blades chops down, turns, and chops down for however many times you push. I gotta tell you, this thing is an absolute lifesaver in the kitchen.

      I cook a LOT of chinese food, and as such use minced garlic and ginger in practically every dish, and its a PAIN IN THE ASS to mince it by hand. Takes 10 seconds in this sucker.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  22. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Are you stupid? RTFA. It explains everything.

    Moron.

  23. Roomba -community-? by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait a sec...roomba "community"?

    I thought the idea was to give you more free time to do fun things. It's pretty sad these people are using that time to sit around in front of the computer and participate in some...pointless...foru...

    [marblehead moment]

    Ahhhh nuts.

    PS:Obligatory slashdotting joke! That community site clogged up faster than a roomba in the wrong part of Dustbunnyville.

  24. Old marketing trick - Ron Popeil is 0wnz5or by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    The dislcaimer at the bottom says the Roomba is a registered trademark of iRobot and the RoboSweep is not made or endorsed by iRobot. There is no mention of the Roomba except here.

    A perfect way to draw comparisons to a competitors obviously? better product while making no false claims or real comparisons - though the artificial intellegence is stretching it a bit. I would have called it 'artifical artifical intellegence'.

    When is someone going to make a lego version of the Roomba, and open source the plans? ;)

    1. Re:Old marketing trick - Ron Popeil is 0wnz5or by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Also an old Google trick. By throwing in a needless mention of the words Roomba and iRobot into complete sentances, it's a way to associate the page with those terms in Google...

    2. Re:Old marketing trick - Ron Popeil is 0wnz5or by jrpascucci · · Score: 1

      > I would have called it 'artifical artifical intellegence'.

      I'd call this 'scarily life-like intelligence'.

  25. We have a Roomba, and it's very dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Roomba isn't very good. We have one in the Team Overbot shop, and it's cute, but not very useful. It gets trapped in chair legs, it jams badly if it encounters a cable, and it doesn't clean very well. Even as insect-level intelligence, it's disappointing. It needs at least enough smarts to get itself out of the situations it gets into. As it is, it takes more time dealing with its problems than it takes to vacuum the space with a conventional vacuum.

    1. Re:We have a Roomba, and it's very dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Exactly.

      Both products do a bad job of sweeping floors. In that case, the product that does the same job using fewer resources is actually the better bit of engineering. Having lots of sensors and motors and processing power and still failing to do the job is even more lame than building a crappy plastic gear.

    2. Re:We have a Roomba, and it's very dumb by FeloniousPunk · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've had my Roomba for several months now and have to completely disagree with this.
      It's extremely useful, and does a fine job of cleaning the floors. It's not as strong as a big upright (which stands to reason, given that it is considerably smaller), but it makes up for the power differential with repetition. When Roomba finishes a room, it's as clean as it would be if I had done it myself. It takes longer, but of course I don't have to expend any effort, which seems a good trade off to me.
      Roomba can get stuck like in a lobster trap, but a minimum of effort makes a room Roomba-friendly. Mine doesn't get stuck in the chair legs, but maybe my chairs are bigger than yours. A lot of my furniture has high enough clearance for the robot to get under to clean. Cables are a problem but this is no different from a normal vacuum cleaner.
      The only major limitation I see is the battery. It holds about enough charge to do 2 small/ medium size rooms or one large room. Recharging takes about 12 hours. At first this bugged me, because I expected to vacuum the house in one go. But I ended up just shifting tactics; I do a couple of rooms in a night, then the others the next night. Turns out, the floors are a lot cleaner now doing a few Roomba jobs a week than vacuuming the whole house at a time once or twice a month.

      --
      I know this because Tyler knows this.
    3. Re:We have a Roomba, and it's very dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem, you NEED to vaccuum at least 2 times a week, so roomba needs to be running constantly.

      The fastest way to trash carpet is to not vaccuum it.

      It blows my mind the number of slobs out there, wearing shoes inside and not vaccuuming every 3 days .

      Cripes, dont tell me you dont mop your hard floors weekly.

      Ick, you slob.

  26. stair test by gradedcheese · · Score: 3, Funny

    so I assume the robosweep, if it got to some stairs, would fall down them unlike the roomba which will stop and turn around. That would be pretty funny t watch and seeing how it's built it would probably break apart then too.

    1. Re:stair test by CXI · · Score: 1

      Ah, but it has some built in intelligence to keep from falling down stairs!!! Notice how the batteries are in the back? It'll just drive over the edge until the wheels aren't on the floor anymore and balance there until you kick it. :)

  27. Don't insult can openers like that... by i8a4re · · Score: 3, Funny

    at least they do what they are designed to do!

    --

    If I drive fast enough at the red light, it'll appear green.
    1. Re:Don't insult can openers like that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but the parent mispelled "intelligent." Twice. Seems to me both the robosweeper AND the can opener have him beat in the intelligance department.

  28. Has the world gone deaf? by Lasuuco+Tulkas · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Automatically cleans your floors while you enjoy life"

    This thing would probably make life unbearable with the noise of the vacuum sucking up the dirt on the ground.

    Why do I get the idea that I would end up just watching this thing clean my floor instead of enjoying my life. It would seem to me that getting off my lazy bottom and cleaning the floor myself would be a better way to appreciate the fact that I can move around than whatever it is these people think I should be doing.

    Also, if this thing takes away all the crumbs and skin that accumulate on the floor - which in turn provide nourishment for a multitude of life - wouldn't this machine be destroying the very life you are trying to enjoy? ;)

  29. mirror by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://suspended.net/robosweep/robosweep.html One of the images is missing, but better than nothing...

  30. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Score -1 : fucktard 100%

  31. Give 'em a b reak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing is only 40 bucks for god's sake!

    Got something better/cheaper for lazy people?

    1. Re:Give 'em a b reak by shaitand · · Score: 1

      yeah nothing. The thing doesn't work, no matter how lazy you are, doesn't work means your out $40 and STILL have to vacuum yourself!

  32. Damnation Alley Post Apocalyptic Model by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This will beat the FloorSweeper like a red-headed stepchild. Shizzle me Timbers!.

    1. Re:Damnation Alley Post Apocalyptic Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those oopic chips are closed source, the compiler is closed source, doesn't run on linux, doesn't even run on XP, and cost a fortune. Get an atmel instead.

  33. As Seen On TV by Baron_Yam · · Score: 3, Funny

    I dunno if it's a chain or my local mall is just 'lucky', but we have a store called "As Seen On TV" full of all the crap that by all rights shouldn't sell to anyone with sufficient IQ to navigate from their couch to the mall.

    1. Re:As Seen On TV by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a chain. There's also a website, but it's unclear whether they're the same company. And yes, they carry the RoboSweep.

    2. Re:As Seen On TV by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Actually...

      I believe asseenontv.com is affiliated with/run by a company that deals in volume sales of infomercials and commercials.... product placement services.

      So while they don't own everything in relation to the product, they do manage at least one aspect of its sales.

      Someone at my office could better answer this question, but you get me instead!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    3. Re:As Seen On TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ut we have a store called "As Seen On TV" full of all the crap that by all rights shouldn't sell to anyone with sufficient IQ to navigate from their couch to the mall.

      you obviousally haven't really looked at the twits shopping in one of those stores.

      I mean come on... name one thing that Ron Popiel has "invented" that wasn't complete junk.

    4. Re:As Seen On TV by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "I dunno if it's a chain or my local mall is just 'lucky', but we have a store called "As Seen On TV" full of all the crap that by all rights shouldn't sell to anyone with sufficient IQ to navigate from their couch to the mall."

      We have one at the Mall of America in Minneapolis. And occasionally, in the little performance area one floor below in the open area, there are gatherings of people who bring all their latest gadgets and cleaning products and whatever else they concocted at home that they try to sell to the people who run these kinds of As Seen on TV things. Its actually quite funny to watch.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:As Seen On TV by netringer · · Score: 1
      There's a Home Shopping Network outlet in one of the outlet malls at the Illinois/Wisconsin border.

      What I find funny is about every product you see in the store "in the flesh" is obviously lightweight and crap, but you can see that it must look like it's the real deal on TV.

      --
      Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
  34. Circular shape of roomba sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can it vacuum corners and edges? Those will end up having to be done manually. Especially corners.

    1. Re:Circular shape of roomba sucks by shaitand · · Score: 1

      It has a side brush for just this reason.

  35. This product doesn't suck. by merchant_x · · Score: 4, Funny

    eh..eh?

    1. Re:This product doesn't suck. by glyph42 · · Score: 1

      True story: A buddy of mine used to sell vacuum cleaners. He said it sucked. Then he worked for IBM for a while. He said it blew.

      --
      Music speeds up when you yawn, but does not change pitch.
  36. Precious Roy? by Wrexen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone else reminded of the Precious Roy sketches from "Sifl and Olly" ?

    Precious Roy, Precious Roy
    Making lots of suckers out of girls and boys!

    Suckers!

  37. Scams by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Sometimes i wonder if not taking part in mass consumer scams makes me a good person or just really really stupid - i should be making inferior products damnit!!

    btw that was the slashdotting record, i tried it at 3 comments and it was already down! thanks all the people that mirrored it:)

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  38. Can we say STEAMPUNK?!? by strredwolf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can we? Huh?

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  39. Re:Slashdot hosting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  40. But I wonder.... by Kickstart70 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are the makers of RoboCrap/Sweep going to sue under the DCMA, claiming that this dude reverse engineered the robot?

    1. Re:But I wonder.... by orkysoft · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Shh! Don't give them any dangerous ideas!

      Step 1: create a lame knockoff product
      Step 2: Slashdotter "reverse engineers" it
      Step 3: Sue aforementioned Slashdotter under the DMCA
      (Step 3 is ??? if he's outside of the USA)
      Step 4: Profit!

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    2. Re:But I wonder.... by Danse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are the makers of RoboCrap/Sweep going to sue under the DCMA, claiming that this dude reverse engineered the robot?

      That would imply that there was actually some engineering involved in the creation of the RoboSweep. I think that's something they'd be hard-pressed to prove in court.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    3. Re:But I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With that well know circumvention device...

      the screwdriver.

  41. Case modding, anyone? by ps_inkling · · Score: 5, Funny
    With so much empty space, this device is crying out for accessories. Add a squirt bottle and aquarium pump, and it's an automatic wet floor cleaner (like the Swiffer family). Since it only works on flat surfaces, this could make it useful.

    Replacing the NiCad batteries with LiIon would up the run time significantly.

    Turning your kitchen floor into a maze of diverters so that it cleans the entire floor (instead of just the edges) would be a worthy weekend project.

    A simple IR emitter-detector could cut power to the motor when something is in front of it.

    Or, you could put an old i386 motherboard and wireless ethernet inside, and have a firewall and clean floors at the same time.

    You could slam it, and have a low-rider cleaner. Wait, they already did that.

    1. Re:Case modding, anyone? by lommer · · Score: 1

      You could slam it, and have a low-rider cleaner. Wait, they already did that.

      Props to the first guy who puts hydraulics in one of these things so it can bounce! Then it might actually get some dirt under it :-)

    2. Re:Case modding, anyone? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      Well, going with NiMH instead of NiCad would be a good idea, however LiIons don't handle high-discharge loads nearly as well as NiCads.

      LiIons are great for low-draw applications where you need a medium amount of power for a long time, but they'll die pretty quick if you hammer them for every volt/amp they can put out.

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    3. Re:Case modding, anyone? by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      Well, going with NiMH instead of NiCad would be a good idea, however LiIons don't handle high-discharge loads nearly as well as NiCads.

      You don't have a very serious weight limit in this thing - put in a small lead/acid gel cell. That might even give you a long enough lifetime to be useful.

  42. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    die now

  43. Rodney Brooks by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was at a lecture Rodney Brooks gave when he was in Amsterdam almost a year ago. He explained what kind of research he did, and how he incorporated it in his Roomba product.

    Obviously, this RoboSweep thing is a complete fake. It looks like it's advertised on those stupid home shopping programmes (see the official website, the "As Seen On TV" blurb on the packaging, etc).

    This leads me to reinforce my suspicion that all products promoted at home shopping programmes are fake and ineffective.

    I don't doubt most Slashdotters are like-minded in this respect, but those who know people who order that crap, might want to tell them about the fake cleaning machine, and how that is probably only the tip of the iceberg (crap-berg?).

    It actually reminds me of a toy car I used to play with in my youth, that had exactly such a rotating thing with small wheels on it, so the battery-powered car seemed to move in a semi-random fashion. I didn't find that very intruiging even at the age of five.

    If you really want to get a cleaning robot, get a Roomba.

    With a bit of luck, they'll sell just eight of those RoboSweeps -- to Dr. Zoidberg! ;-)

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:Rodney Brooks by phpsocialclub · · Score: 1

      I would never buy anything of Shop At Home or HSN but I did see them selling a Roomba, the original robot vaccum that people seem to like, the other day.

      Infomercials are a different story, that stuff is almost always crap.

      The shopping networks tend to actually sell real brands, Dell, sony, etc.

    2. Re:Rodney Brooks by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      Actually; one product that does work is Oxyclean. I'm not sure how or why, but it does really work.

  44. robowars by simonjester2424 · · Score: 1

    We need to have all the unhappy customers send in their "robots" to one of the fighting robot shows and they could compete over who can kill the most of these things in under 5 minites.

    --
    Beware of gifts bearing Greeks.
    1. Re:robowars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had a "Mini Robot War" a couple months back. Basically, remote control cars with stupid tinfoil covers on them. It got old quick, and they sent Sir KillALot in and he squashed both of them.

  45. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It both sucks and blows.

  46. Where's the tea? by Bullfrog · · Score: 2, Funny

    All you have to do is program it to say "What?", "I don't understand," and "Where's the tea?" and who'd know the difference?

  47. or you could spend $3k (AUD) and get... by kgbspy · · Score: 1

    http://trilobite.electrolux.com/ now -that- looks like something you could install linux on!

    --
    ~
    ~
    ~
    -- INSERT --
  48. Has anyone actually used a roomba? by Guano_Jim · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just curious... I'd like to hear opinions from people who aren't on Roomba's website.

    Before I buy one, I want to know if it will keep up with my two-year old. I envision some kind of evolutionary arms race between my daughter and the Roomba, where the Roomba gets smarter and bigger and my daughter finds new and messier ways to screw up the living room carpet.

    Eventually the Roomba will evolve into SkyNet and a former California governor will travel back in time to shoot me.

    1. Re:Has anyone actually used a roomba? by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

      Thus, you won't be able to have a daughter. Clean floors! :P

    2. Re:Has anyone actually used a roomba? by Scyber · · Score: 1

      I have a roomba. I live in an apartment with a thin carpet and a tile kitchen. Works great for us. I usually just start it up before I go to work and let it do its work while I am out.

    3. Re:Has anyone actually used a roomba? by chefmonkey · · Score: 1
      Well, for the record, our two-year-old son is definitely winning. He thinks the Roomba is great fun, though. If you leave it out where he can get to it, he'll just keep starting it whenever it stops until the battery runs out.

      It does a pretty decent job, even with all the cat hair we accumulate on the carpet. You still need to drag out the old-fashioned vacuum cleaner about once a month to get the deep-down stuff, though. Personally, I think it was well worth the money. I think we're probably going to buy a second battery and/or rapid charger soon, though. It can only get through about 1000 square feet before the battery is down for the count, and then you need to wait a whole day for it to charge.

    4. Re:Has anyone actually used a roomba? by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      If/when I get one I'll have to set up a webcam to watch how my pets deal with the Roomba. Currently our non-robotic vacuum is what freaks out my dog the most after thunderstorms and the word "bath". At least when I'm manning the vacuum he can give me the wtf look.

    5. Re:Has anyone actually used a roomba? by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 2, Funny

      I recommend buying enough explosives to blow up TEN SUPERCOMPUTERS along with any Roomba, just in case it does decide to kill off your family.

    6. Re:Has anyone actually used a roomba? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purchased the Roomba and my wife returned it. :) My 6 month old loved chasing it. It efficiently cleans a 10x12 room but it gets snagged on carpet edges and more annoyingly it gets stuck under the couch and under cabinets. If you don't have either of these, you and your neighbors will love it. The waste compartment was a tad bit small, hopefully it will get bigger in future versions.
      P.S. I can't wait for Roomba II, when a former California Senator comes back to save you from the California Governor.

    7. Re:Has anyone actually used a roomba? by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have two cats that were initially pretty freaked out by the roomba. But that's because they couldn't really anticipate what it was doing/going to do. My regular vacuum cleaner is MUCH louder, so whenever I turned that on they'd run under the bed. The roomba is quiet enough that it gets their attention, but doesn't really scare them much (unless they lose focus on where it's going and it ends up running into one of them. I've seen a couple of spectacular flips because of this :-) Now that they're pretty much used ot it, they start by following it around, then lose interest and go about their business. Overall it's been pretty good. My place is mostly hardwood floors, with tile in the kitchen and a fairly thick rug in the living room. It has trouble with the think pile of the living room rug, but handles everything else beautifully.

    8. Re:Has anyone actually used a roomba? by unk1911 · · Score: 1

      yeah, i did. it's pretty cool. check out my review here. if that link doesn't work click go to this url: http://www.epinions.com/content_108070014596

  49. I will now combine two story topics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point of this overpriced monstrosity when I can just a hire a cheap illegal mexican immigrant to vacuum my carpets for $3 an hour and if he gets hurt I can just call the cops and have him deported, no messy lawsuits...

    Ya right, why pay for an overpriced robot when human labor is so damn cheap! Yay capitalism!

  50. Tomy Robots by maddskillz · · Score: 1

    This totally reminds me of the Tomy Robot Dustbot that I had when I was a kid. And to think, that technology existed in the 80's

  51. you can still buy these toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the "differential" "gear action" people are talking about is just plain old "Bump'n Go" action.

    This is really nothing more than a "Bump n' Go" toy with a wiper on the bottom.

    It really should retail for around $5.00

    There is NO "vacuum" action, that's why it's only called a Robo"SWEEPER"

    Move along now, this is not the Robovac you are looking for.....

  52. Yes, but does it have FireWire? by JohnA · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the offical Roomba FAQ:

    Can Roomba's music/ sound be changed or disabled?
    Unfortunately, Roomba's music/ sound cannot be modified or disconnected.


    Um... does anyone else feel a bit confused, dare I say scared, by a music-playing vacuum cleaner?

    Dunno... maybe it's just me.
    1. Re:Yes, but does it have FireWire? by brettper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, Roomba's music/ sound cannot be modified or disconnected.

      Heh. I reckon a few sharp blows with a sharp implement to the speaker should take care of disconnecting the sound

    2. Re:Yes, but does it have FireWire? by DennyK · · Score: 1

      This is the first thing that pops into my head when I think of a singing Roomba... ;)

      DennyK

  53. And In Other News... by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 2, Funny

    Shares in As Seen On TV fell $12.37 to $1.12 as investors reacted to a poll showing that every American over the age of 18 has been screwed over at least once by idiotic late-night TV pitches, according to an Ipsos-Reid survey.

    Including the investors.

    Only 10% of the populace is reported to be stupid enough to purchase off of TV again. Strangely, most of the 10% is made up of Americans with double barreled names, such as Peggy-Anne, Donny-Joe or Birdman-Sue.

    Cledus the Slack-Jawed Yokel was not available for comment.

    1. Re:And In Other News... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Stragely enough, HSN, America's Store (HSN 2), QVC, Shop At Home, ShopNBC, and ACN are all still coming into my DirecTV system.

    2. Re:And In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Cletus". (you slack-jawed yokel.)

    3. Re:And In Other News... by xThinkx · · Score: 1

      That's "Cletus"...

      ...sigh, another Simpsons infidel

      --
      Let's get one thing perfectly clear, I did not vote for George W Bush, and I do not endorse what he does or says.
      "
  54. Yes by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    Years ago I purchased a kitchen gadget that slices and dices vegetables. It's especially good for onions and ten years later, I still use it when I have to dice four large onions for a batch of jambalaya. It cuts the time by a factor of at least four and results in no onion tears. It's cheap, shoddy, but still works fine probably ten years later.

    So, yes, I have purchased something from an infomercial and been happy with it. I've never purchased anything else though and may never because the vast majority of it is complete, unadulterated junk. The thing you have to ask yourself: If the item I am seeing was made with the cheapest, shoddiest materials and labor available, would it be useful? If the answer is "yes", then you may have a winner.

  55. your kidding??? by MeThOdXxX · · Score: 1

    This is unbelievable, you mean to tell me that there are people out there that would pay hundreds of dollars for a vacuum cleaner that vacuums by itself? Once again another way to prove how lazy some people can be.
    I seem to remember a /. article a few weeks ago about a voice activated televison set.....Now all we need is this vacuum, a shitter built into the recliner, and a voice activated stove on wheels and we'll never have to get up.

    What is the world coming too.............

    --
    HaHaHaHaHa
    1. Re:your kidding??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a shitter built into the recliner

      I think Homer Simpson has a patent on that one already

    2. Re:your kidding??? by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Perhaps these guys would be interested in marketing the reclining shitter...

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    3. Re:your kidding??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your english is any indication, the world is certainly going downhill - or, at least, dumbhill. "your kidding", "coming too" - those english classes that your mean junior high school teachers make you go to aren't naptime, you know...

      What *is* this world coming to...?

  56. Roomba's performance by Boawk · · Score: 1

    After seeing the pictures of RoboSweep, I was curious how well Roomba (the original product) performed. Here's a review

  57. FREE BATTERIES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It says it comes with "FREE BATTERIES"!!!

    forget paying $39.95, I just want the Free Batteries!

    if you go here you can click on the link on the bottom and talk to someone on the phone.

    we should all contact customer service and ask for our FREE BATTERIES!

    1. Re:FREE BATTERIES! by hplasm · · Score: 1

      I'm still waiting for my "Free" Nelson Mandela(s) to arrive....

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  58. Good vs. Evil, Analog vs. Digital? :) by saikou · · Score: 1

    "-- You see! They managed to build a sweeping robot with pure analog parts! Motor and switches!
    We, on the other hand, found an engenious way to emulate those functions with sophisticated CPU, that costs more than TWO of those pesky sweepers!"

    Hm...

    1. Re:Good vs. Evil, Analog vs. Digital? :) by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember a toy from the 70s and 80s, which involved a "robot" that ran off of specially shaped cogs and gears. One would determine the distance, a couple others would determine direction (left, right, circle), another would set up a special function (stop, spin turret, flash lights and play sounds), before resuming the pattern again.

      Slightly more complicated versions were made for more money, which involved a simple optical reader and a rotating paper disc which the user would mark off spots for distance, turns, etc. If I recall correctly, there were Mindstorm Lego sets that worked on this principle as well.

      Why not make a version of the Roomba that does that? It's technically an analog computer, and would be cheap as hell to mass produce. A lot closer to a "real" robot than Robosweep is.

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    2. Re:Good vs. Evil, Analog vs. Digital? :) by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1
      Why not make a version of the Roomba that does that? It's technically an analog computer, and would be cheap as hell to mass produce.
      This was my first thought as well. Despite the obviously fraudulent Robosweep, as I watched a real Roomba tackle a friends kitchen floor I realized that investing in a bigger battery to power a stronger vacuum and longer runtime and dumping the computerized electronics for a simpler "bump and go" type circuit might do a better job of actually getting a floor cleaned unattended.
  59. lessons learnt by holloway · · Score: 4, Funny

    robots.txt keeps the spiders away

  60. Ummm... it dosen't vacuum? by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    You really should read the article (yeah, its been /.ed beyond belief) but, this deivce is nothing more than a wipe attached to a motor, nothing else. It does no vaccuming at all, and just goes around pushing dirt around it because the clearence is so low that no dirt actually gets to the wipe anyway. So, essentially its nothing more than a motor.

    Maybe they'll recall these things because they "forgot" to put in its "intelligence."

    1. Re:Ummm... it dosen't vacuum? by Lasuuco+Tulkas · · Score: 1

      I was refurring to the Roomba.

  61. I saw this for myself by Professr3 · · Score: 1

    A couple of meetings ago, the Atlanta Hobby Robot Club had the opportunity to admire the intricate inner workings of this vacuum cleaner. We decided the company that sells it needs some advice - drop the price to $9.99 and pray very, very hard.

  62. I'll keep my robovacuum by cvk · · Score: 1

    I have an automatic kitchen floor cleaner than never misses even the tiniest crumb! ...AND it plays fetch!

    1. Re:I'll keep my robovacuum by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2, Funny

      mine also does dishes(prewash), and disguises itself as a throw rug when not in use. Sometimes, during program misbahavior, it takes out the garbage.

    2. Re:I'll keep my robovacuum by ishmaelflood · · Score: 1

      How did you train a cockroach to play fetch?

  63. Re:Rodney Brooks (Tortoises) by cheesedog · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I took Brook's "Embodied Intelligence" at MIT. Want to know the funny thing? One of his sources of inspiration were the 1950s work of Grey Walter, called "tortoises." What were tortoises? Little more than a servo hooked up to a differential which would spin and move forward in a random fashion.

    But even 1950s tech was ahead of the Robosweep. It did have a single light sensor, and through some clever work by Davis, could be constructed so that when their batteries started to run low, would make their way back to a recharging hut, given that the hut had a bright light in it.

    If the robosweep could accomplish as much without any central processor (lack of central processing is, after all, one of the tenets of Brooks subsumption architecture, and thus part of the design of the Roomba), I'm sure Rodney would applaud the feat.

  64. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was this moderated as Flaimebait?
    Just because his political wievs are a bit to the right I don't think he was "baiting"
    So moderators, please grow up and moderate on arguments, not political wievs.

  65. Linux + robot sweeper = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    No longer do you have to manual sweep your floor, nor do you have to get big and fat for laying on your ass for letting a robot do it.

    The Get Your Ass In Gear disto of Linux is for you!

    Simple modification of this sweeper robot, adding lcd screen means you need to chase your terminal around the house to check your e-mail, peform daily tasks, and you'll be in shape in no time.

    The Future Is Here, not there!

    1. Re:Linux + robot sweeper = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My kingdom for a mod point. LMAO

  66. Miracle Blade Knifes! by Alystair · · Score: 3, Funny

    We bought a bunch of these Miracle Blade 3 things... damn these suckers are sharp (and stay sharp, great for tough steak/cinderblocks), if you can help me find my left index finger that would help though. Very happy with the set, we even got a second one for free accidently.

    1. Re:Miracle Blade Knifes! by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness they are some very nice knives...

    2. Re:Miracle Blade Knifes! by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Should have warning label: "Do not touch blade with remaining fingers". ;)

      --
    3. Re:Miracle Blade Knifes! by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1
      We bought a bunch of these Miracle Blade 3 things... damn these suckers are sharp (and stay sharp, great for tough steak/cinderblocks), if you can help me find my left index finger that would help though. Very happy with the set, we even got a second one for free accidently.

      Let me get this straight: you got a second left index finger for free ?

      ;)

    4. Re:Miracle Blade Knifes! by schon · · Score: 1

      stay sharp, great for tough steak/cinderblocks

      Remind me to say "no", the next time you invite me over for dinner. :o)

    5. Re:Miracle Blade Knifes! by cens0r · · Score: 1

      They maybe sharp. But they're light and flimsy. Now my Henckles chefs knife on the other hand is heavy, and because of that much more useful. It can chop much faster, slice, dice and crush. Try mincing garlic without a heavy chefs knife sometime. Sure it needs to be taken care of (a quick honing every time you wash it), and it does loose it's edge (most seafood dept's in grocery stores will sharpen it for free), but the thing will last a life time.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  67. AND they are SPAMVERTIZED by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    In addition to being poorly engineered, they are also spamvertised rather heavily - I think I got three or four spams proclaiming I'd won a free RoboSweep just today.

    Yet another reason to avoid them.

  68. Reminds me of Blip: The Digital Game by Wesley+Everest · · Score: 1
    Anyone remember Blip? It was a handheld pong game back when a 3x7 pixel handheld football game was all the rage. It was actually kinda fun, but I remember popping it open to see what kind of computer it had in it:
    • battery compartment
    • wires
    • one red LED
    • one switch
    To play, you would wind it up and a spring would drive plastic gears that would move the "ball" back and forth. It didn't really matter whether it was "turned on" or not since the switch just lit the LED.

    Yeah, digital -- either meaning that you had one digital bit (the LED could be on or off) -- or meaning that you play it with your fingers which are also known as "digits".

  69. Spamvertised by hbo · · Score: 1

    My spam bucket is filling up with swill advertising these things. It's nice to know they are worthless without ever having to do the experiment of buying one. Not that I was in danger. I will never do business with anyone who is employed spam, unless I'm going to suffer, a lot, by not doing so.

    --

    "Even if you are on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there" - Will Rogers

  70. 1st autonomous vacuum to cross america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    we sent out 5 of these guys last week.

    1st got ran over by an SUV, them sons of bitches
    2nd batteries ran out
    3rd ran into bad weather
    4th one was lost

    5th one is still going strong, it things go well we hope it will make it to the end of the block by tomorrow.

  71. hmm. by tedtimmons · · Score: 1
    I was underwhelmed by the roomba when I saw it operate in person. The guys' cats loved it, but there are a couple of problems:

    * it has no idea where it is. It might vacuum the same spot 5 times and never hit the other half of the room or hallway.
    * the 'algorithm' to find a big spiral to vac is pretty stupid. Basically it just bounces around in random patterns, trying to fit a big spiral into it.
    * it seems like it wouldn't have been hard to make it find a charger and dock over a charging paddle. Here come the trolls^Hposts to refute this, but it turns it into little more than a child's toy.

    Sure, it's only $200, but it wouldn't replace your normal vac.

  72. holy crap by SpacePunk · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had toy cars as a kid that did this. It'd roll untill it hit something then turn and roll again. I had no idea that I was using state of the art artificial intelligence way back then! Wow!

  73. I have a theory by Boyceterous · · Score: 2, Funny

    that if all products like RoboSweep, Tap lights, Thigh Masters, electronic inset repellers, Clappers, Buttoneers, Mr. Microphones, OxyClean, Ginsu Knives, and anything else that's advertized on TV after 2 a.m. were assembled into ONE GIANT MACHINE we would have... either a black hole that only sucks in money or the first device suitable for sanctioning spammers. Spammers mercilessly tortured while you rest! Sound effects optional...Canadians add one dollar!

  74. Tunderstick Pro! by useosx · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's pretty good. Mashes things up like a bad mofo.

    1. Re:Tunderstick Pro! by useosx · · Score: 1

      T[h]understick Pro. I mash words up like a bad mofo.

  75. roomba video and pics.. by ptorrone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    well, that roombacommunity site rocks, while i do enjoy my roomba, it's now going to be made in to a robot and do something else, i'm thinking a wifi-finder, we'll see. here are some pics and vid, next time i post pics, it'll be a franken-roomba. enjoy.

    pics

    video

    cheers,
    pt

    1. Re:roomba video and pics.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so from what we gather, you have way too much money.
      Anyone that has the >$1000 to waste on an abio, and a very weak vaccuum called a roomba.

      Ok, I want tests...

      My 6 amp hoover upright versus this roomba.

      what cleans the carpet better.

      I'm betting my hoover that was 1/5th the price will kick it's butt.

    2. Re:roomba video and pics.. by ptorrone · · Score: 1

      hmm, not sure i want to participate in a "suck off".

      you turn on your hoover, turn it on and leave it in the middle of the room without touching it. i'll turn on my vaccuum and turn it on in the middle of the room, we'll see which one cleans the floor better :-]

      i guess you could also hand scrub your clothes and they'd be cleaner, but i like my washer and dryer too.



      aibos are a lot of fun to program, i don't have kids so a $400 ebay abio is way cheaper than a kiddo.

      cheers,
      pt

  76. How about Java? by watersco · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It isn't quite the same as running Linux, but we have hacked a Roomba to run Java. We desoldered the micro on the Roomba board and hooked it up to a Javelin Stamp instead.

    Pics here. It's kind of slow. Being slashdotted is not a good way to discover that your ISP does bandwidth limiting :-(.

    Once the vacuuming brushes are removed the Roomba is much quieter and I am sure that battery life at least doubles. Chris.

  77. More Pics by mesach · · Score: 1

    Heres some more pics of the "Hacked Roomba using a Parallax Javelin Stamp to replace the microcontroller."

    --
    moo.
  78. Re:Translation - RTFA! by TraumaHound · · Score: 1

    It both sucks and blows.

    If you'd have bothered to read the article, you'd see it neither sucks nor blows.

  79. No match for my roomba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love my roomba, it's so quiet I can even work on Photoshop on my PowerBook and I've never had to get it unstuck. I think it's even smarter than my cat, Steve. I suppose PC users might like this vaccuum.

  80. sketchy ebay listings for this crap.... by Mobster75 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Doing a quick eBay search for "robosweep" returns a few listings saying: "ROOMBA ROBOSWEEP INTELLIGENT SWEEPER"

    Very very deceptive.....

    And look at the crap description.... I almost fell off my chair laughing....

    *Similar to Roomba but at a fraction of the price!

    RoboSweep is a very affordably priced sweeper, especially compared to other robotic cleaners on the market..

    RoboSweep uses built-in intellegence to stay in the room it's sweeping. Just turn it on and it sweeps!
    (Ya... sweeps your $40 away...)

    Of course, at the end:

    THIS IS NOT A ROOMBA! IT IS A ROBOSWEEP!


    Just when I thought things were bad enough.... more searching finds some place is selling this thing for $46!!

    Caveat emptor! A fool and his money are sooooo soon parted on the Internet ;)

  81. Political wievs? by RabidOverYou · · Score: 1

    What, are those sweaters sold at an anti-NAFTA rally?

  82. Hey! by MoeMoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    That jerk stole my little brothers science project! Even though he only spent 5 minutes on it, he could atleast get a D+, give it back!

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
  83. This thing sure is popular! by maskedferret · · Score: 1

    Just google "robosweep" and observe the results...

  84. A real grill is better by bluGill · · Score: 1

    I have one of those things. I also have a real grill out on my deck. I've used the Georde foreman thing three times in two years. Everytime I've been disappointed. The food is faster, but has no flavor. When I go outside it doesn't take much longer, and the food tastes better, and there is no cleanup.

    I know many of you live in apartments where you can't have a grill on your deck. However if you have the option get a real outdoor grill instead you will be much happier.

    P.S. A real grill is worth spending a little money on. Everyone I know who has not bought a Weber has been disapointed in 5 years, those who spent extra on the Weber are happy many years latter. Not the Weber is the only good brand, there are others, but Weber has the name and it works. (Some of the others are appearently better quality for less price, but who knows if they are good or another cheap one?)

    1. Re:A real grill is better by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I'm in total agreeance, but my opinion may be biased since I do thoroughly enjoy foreign particles in all of my meat barbeque sessions.

      However, a long time ago, my friends found an excellent use for the george foreman grill.

      LAN parties...

      No gaming event is complete without fresh cooked meets and other tasties.

      Of course... we are also the same group that decided to combine alcohol with Quake3 at the time.

      Experience may vary!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:A real grill is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, but for those of us who live in apartments that don't allow gas/charcoal grills, it's a damn fine substitute. Had mine for 3 years, use it constantly.

    3. Re:A real grill is better by bhima · · Score: 1

      I have a Webber grill and a George Forman grill. You are right on some counts but not all counts. Simply put you don't cook the same things or the same ways on the two devices. I've found that as the weather cools off my George Forman grill gets more and more use. Personally I don't use it very much to cook a slab of meat like a big steak, I use to cook little one fast like stuff to go on salads, or soups, or finger food. It's damn good with sausages.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    4. Re:A real grill is better by troc · · Score: 1

      A Georde Foreman?

      Scary stuff, putting Northeners in charge of the building. Brickies are hard enough to understand as it is......

      Troc

      PS Brief aside for non-brits. A Geordie is from the North East of England, specifically Northumberland, more specifically Newcastle (noocassle) upon Tyne.

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    5. Re:A real grill is better by cens0r · · Score: 1

      And if I'm going to grill inside, I use my handy dandy lodge cast iron grill pan. It may only cook one side at a time, but it has the uncanny ability to be able to sear the outside, and then finish the cooking in a preheated oven. Lets see the george foreman do that!

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  85. Either really sad, or really elegant. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

    That has to be the saddest attempt at making a competing product. It uses nothing besides some gears to move around obstacles (no circuitry), uses wipes to clean floor (which don't work well according to website author, says it barely picks up dirt and it only does on the front of wipe), moves slowly, and obviously can't clean anything besides smooth surfaces. Is there a lamest products ever list? This really deserves it.

    The thing that gives me pause is that something like this could actually work, if you tweak the undercarriage to solve the "pushing dust in front" problem.

    Will it clean an area as quickly as an intelligent, microprocessor-driven cleaning robot? Of course not.

    What it _will_ do is random-walk all over my kitchen sweeping up dust overnight. At that price, it might even be worth it (as long as the batteries hold out; kitbashing a gel cell into it might be worthwhile).

    Just because a design's simple doesn't mean it's worthless. An inefficient but cheap solution has its place.

    1. Re:Either really sad, or really elegant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Just because a design's simple doesn't mean it's worthless. An inefficient but cheap solution has its place.

      Wrong, expensive, inefficent.
      Pick any two.

    2. Re:Either really sad, or really elegant. by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1
      The thing that gives me pause is that something like this could actually work, if you tweak the undercarriage to solve the "pushing dust in front" problem.

      Isn't there another problem: it would not clean the middle of the room. The turning is triggered when it hits obstacles. Thus, it'd turn only as long as it hasn't re-oriented itself enough that it can pass the obstacle: result: you set it into the middle of the room, it heads straight to a wall, and from then on follows the walls in a circular motion around the room, leaving the middle of the room uncleaned... Or did I miss something here?

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    3. Re:Either really sad, or really elegant. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      Isn't there another problem: it would not clean the middle of the room. The turning is triggered when it hits obstacles. Thus, it'd turn only as long as it hasn't re-oriented itself enough that it can pass the obstacle: result: you set it into the middle of the room, it heads straight to a wall, and from then on follows the walls in a circular motion around the room, leaving the middle of the room uncleaned... Or did I miss something here?

      Depends on how it re-orients itself. If you can get it to bounce, as opposed to just track the wall, it'll make random passes across the room. You could do this by putting a spring and a friction mount on the rotating drive unit.

  86. From one retailer's website: by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    http://www.youcansave.com/robosweep.asp

    The Easy, and Intelligent
    Way to Sweep Your Floors!
    Wouldn't it be nice to relax and read a book, or drink some coffee, as somebody else swept your floors? Now you can! That "somebody else" is an intelligent robot named RoboSweep!

    RoboSweep uses artificial intelligence to sweep your entire floor. It won't miss an inch of your wood, linoleum, or tile! It will sweep and lift up anything from pet hair, dust and ashes, to paper and rubber! No more backaches, dusty brooms or sweat!

    ---

    Wow. Just WOW. I knew that infomercials were 90% false advertising, but this! Who wants to buy one and sue the manufacturer off the face of the planet for fraudulent claims?

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  87. Rug-muncher by gooru · · Score: 1

    Hopefully, it won't replace me as a super rugmuncher!

  88. From experience does not seem to be true... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what situation you were trying it in, but from experience the Roomba usually does not miss much. Repetition is good as the one weakness of the Roomba is just that - weakness, in vacuuming power. Perhaps you had the wrong room size selected?

    I also appreciate the sensor that keeps it from falling down stairs. They didn't have to do that and could have sold more "virtual walls" but happily it's pretty bulletproof.

    You might not think much of the spiral approach but really I think it's about the best way to approach vacuuming a carpet. I don't know if you noticed but on any kind of rug wheeled vehicles often drift quite a bit (true of the Big Track of old too), so doing a end to end sweep of a room will not work well and will miss strips of carpet which is a lot more annoying than a few spots that will get hit on a run a day or two later.

    Until they really get the whole robotic vision thing down pat, the Roomba does pretty well for being as blind as it is.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  89. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did this phrase came from? I read it many times here.

    1. Re:huh? by phoebusQ · · Score: 0

      The Simpsons

    2. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing the Simpsons episode where Homer becomes an astronaut.

  90. USB by fredistheking · · Score: 2, Funny
    I never could order my USB model from think geek. It has been out of stock for ever. =(

    -

  91. In With The Bots by H8X55 · · Score: 0

    For years women have used vibrators, threatening to replace men with their battery powered buddies. Now we've fought back. Between robots that clean everthing, archived internet pronz, and cloning, who needs 'em?

    woman that nag and complain
    old and busted

    robots that do the housework
    the new hotness.

    and see if they complain about a toilet seat left up.

  92. Ultimate geek robot vacuum... by mpthompson · · Score: 1

    Screw the Roomba and RoboSweep, now here is the ultimate geek robot vacuum.

  93. What's missing... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1

    A floor washing option. Vacuuming it fine for living room, bedroom and office, but what about the kitchen floor which gets sticky, rather than dusty?

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  94. Robocra-ahem-sweep by omarin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The RoboSweep people should be hauled in for fraud!
    I saw the pictures of its insides... and basically (from a long childhood of disassembling toy "bump n go" robots) I believe the RoboSweep is worth about $5 bucks, tops.
    Do this:
    1. Go into your local KayBee or Toys R Us toystore or swapmeet/fleamarket.
    2. Buy one of those $5 buck "bump n go" robots/cars.
    3. Dissassemble said toy
    4. Note the virtually identical setup as the "RoboSweep": battery case, wires, one made-in-China 25 cent motor, little go-round-n-round wheels.
    And reading the RoboSweep site http://www.youcansave.com/robosweep.asp, it promises the world out of what is basically a child's cheap-ass toy! Class action anyone? ;-)

  95. Packbot ? Next joke ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is what our tax dollars go toward.

    The Viet Cong would have had them modified to serve
    after-dinner drinks in an hour...

  96. Toy cars by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

    There is a small plastic gearbox that works a bit like the differential in a car. If the robot is on the ground then the gearbox turns the little wheels and the robot moves forward. When the robot gets stuck the force of the motor has to go somewhere and the gearbox 'slips' and rotates the turret instead (until the wheels start moving again).

    I had battery operated toy cars tenty years ago that worked like that! They'd drive around the room, automatically changing direction whenever they hit an obstacle.

  97. can anyone imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a beowulf of these??

  98. You get what you pay for by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really don't understand the gap-jawed complaints some people are expressing. Its a fourty dollar device compared to a TWO HUNDRED dollar device. Please, lets not act too surprised.

    This all reminds me of the DustBuster craze in the 80s. They all plainly sucked, or failed to suck dirt, yet they sold by the millions. Even the heavy-duty Black & Deckers did little then make an annoying whine and create a weird smell.

    Today, the DustBuster market is more or less dead and the ones that have survived are at Target, are a slightly more costly, are larger than the originals, and have tons more sucking power. I'm willing to bet these actually work. It took 20 years but black & decker did it :)

    Will it take another 20 years to perfect the Roomba? Its not all raves you know. It easily gets confused when encountering wiring and cramped spaces, you know the traditional shelters of geeks worldwide.

    Another thing to consider is the law of diminishing returns. $200 is a lot of money for most people and if this RobotVac works half as well it will undercut the Roomba in marketshare.

    Yes, its cheesy and a cheap knock-off but then again so are most components in the PCs people are using to view this message.

    1. Re:You get what you pay for by Znork · · Score: 1

      The thing is that the RoboVac is pretty much exactly the same thing as a $10 2 yearold kids toy with a napkin stuck to it. Except it probably doesnt play a melody while running.

      Try buying one of those kids toy cars and sticking a napkin to it and see how efficient it is at cleaning.

      It wont work half as well; the problem is it basically doesnt work at all. And the RoboVac is four times more expensive than the kids toy with the napkin.

    2. Re:You get what you pay for by clarkcox3 · · Score: 1
      I really don't understand the gap-jawed complaints some people are expressing. Its a fourty dollar device compared to a TWO HUNDRED dollar device. Please, lets not act too surprised.

      The point isn't that it's cheap. The point is that it's marketed as a device with artificial intelligence, yet it has no intelligence by any accepted definition of the word.

      --
      There are no tiger attacks in my area and it's all because this rock I'm holding keeps the tigers away.
    3. Re:You get what you pay for by Koatdus · · Score: 1

      My son (4 years old) has a small remote controlled car that he just loves driving around the house on our hardwood floors..... Hum... I wonder ....

      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
    4. Re:You get what you pay for by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1
      $200 is a lot of money

      Ah, this is where all the junk mail that Bed Bath and Beyond keeps sending you comes in handy. Combine one of their 20% off coupons with another of their $5.00 off coupons and presto: Roomba for $155. While that is a lot of money too, it is comparable to what you would pay for a regular vacuum cleaner.

  99. Roboteers.. ready! by Channard · · Score: 1
    soo... who's going to be the first to get linux running on it?

    No idea, but you can expect to see it on Robot Wars next week..

  100. It is availaible... so now cough up the money by abhikhurana · · Score: 1

    Well, the link that you gave shows that is is availaible...so least you can so is see the link before posting it.

  101. Eeeeew! by lxs · · Score: 1
    Turns out, the floors are a lot cleaner now doing a few Roomba jobs a week than vacuuming the whole house at a time once or twice a month.


    You vacuum your house once a MONTH? If I tried that, I would be knee deep in dirt. ...excuse me but it's time for my yearly bath
  102. "Slightly Lacking?" by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... sounds like something that could be fixed with a pill or two. Checked the ol' spam latelh?

  103. powergen italia anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ass eeno ntv? Ha!

  104. Cheap american crap. This one 0\/\/nz0Rz y'all: by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Trilobyte. European tech kicks ass. Harharhar!
    Honestly now: If I'll ever get a vacuumbot it will be this one. This Trilobyte sucker has some serious tech inside. It actually learns the shapes of the floor it cleans and maneuvers through and past furniture. It starts at programmable time (when you're out of the house) and goes back to it's recharge station when finished. THAT is a vacubot. That other one is a toy that will chrush to chunky kibbles if I accidentally step on it. Or make that 'on purpose'. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  105. Roomba-- it works by JCMay · · Score: 1

    I've had a Roomba since last November. Although it's "AI" software *could* use some refinement, look what it's got for a brain: it's a puny little PIC18-series microcontroller! 8K of program space or something like that! 256 bytes of RAM?

    The main problem I have with the Roomba is that the wife won't use it when she's home because it's noisy, and she doesn't like me to move certian furniture items out of the way to facilitate cleaning (I move those same pieces when manually sweeping). So the only time that Roomba gets to play are my off Fridays (every other week) or evenings when the wife isn't home.

    Sporadic use means that the cat hair accumulates to Roomba-choking volumes. Roomba is definitely a maintenance machine, not a floor scrubber. It does, given its limitations, do a marvelous job. It's more thorough than manually sweeping our wood floors. I've been very happy with my Roomba.

  106. vacuum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is this vacuum thing?

    I thought homes were like car ashtrays, when they get full of dirt, it's time to buy another.

  107. Yes, and No by CausticPuppy · · Score: 1

    First, the "Yes:" Oxy-clean kicks ass. At least on food/drink stains (anything organic). But they're selling the stuff at Wal-mart now so it's pretty much in wide distribution.

    Then, the "No:" Roll-A-Hose sucks ass. In theory, it's a great design, and when you roll it back up it's supposed to squeeze the water out, but the rollers aren't tight enough to get ALL the water out so it turns out to be rather difficult to get the entire hose back onto the spool. And the hose kinks very easily because it's so flexible (please refrain from viagra jokes). They also sell this at various stores.

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  108. sweeper or sleeper???? by venkats · · Score: 1

    hope it does not end up with something like:
    "RoboSleep" - "The intelligent sleeper that sleeps while you rest!"

  109. Yup - he's a geek alright! by twoslice · · Score: 1

    After another minute I was so bored that I picked it up to see what it had done... the wipe was completely clean but it was starting to push dirt in front of it. The ground clearance is so low that the dirt can't go under it to reach the wipe!

    Only a geek would have such a filthy apartment that they would resort to technology to clean it. A mop and bucket is just so yesterday...

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  110. What disclaimer? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    http://shop.infomercial.tv/home_and_garden/misc/ro bosweep/ - I see no disclaimer there.

    The other links are on... www.roombacommunity.com, which has that disclaimer at the bottom of EVERY PAGE - It's a site dedicated to the Roomba that happened to take a look at a "competitor". So no surprise that the disclaimer is there, especially once you notice that the site has it on every single page.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  111. Roomba Wars 2 - Attack of the Clones? by dylan95 · · Score: 1


    Roomba Wars Part 1

    Once I get a couple of these Roomba Clones I'll have a good army for part two - Attack of the Clones. Let the carnage (and cleaning) begin!

  112. Great Stuff! by SkinnyGuy · · Score: 1

    Just proves that iRobot really did accomplish something with the Roomba. I can't wait to see what they cook up next. You know, if you take the cover off the chasis of the RoboSweep and put a toy car body on it, you end up with one of those cars that bounces of walls and then keeps going, but then who would pay $40 for it? If you're into Robots, you should check out http://www.aibohack.com/

  113. Why do I get the feeling... by NickFitz · · Score: 1

    ... I've wandered into a King of the Hill newsgroup?

    --
    Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    1. Re:Why do I get the feeling... by untaken_name · · Score: 1

      .. I've wandered into a King of the Hill newsgroup?

      I have been a salesman of propane and propane accessories for 25 years, and I resent your implication!

  114. some random notes by kisrael · · Score: 1

    Coming in a day late (well, almost) and a dollar short:

    Heh, from an "A-life" perspective, RoboSweep is almost interesting. Roomba uses (I would guess) something akin to real AI, where as RoboSweep--at best--has the same kind of "strucutral intelligence" that insects and the like have evolved. It's surprising some of the task-specific intelligence you can demonstrate even without a brain if your physical structures and reflexes are good enough.

    "As seen on TV" can really run the spectrum of total crap to great products. My Aunt and Uncle love their showtime rotisserie oven. It really lives up to its promises. But you should probably beware any product marketed as "just like the expensive one, but much cheaper!"--the laws of getting more or less what you're paying for still apply.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  115. love my roomba by cacheMan · · Score: 4, Informative
    My Dad's sarcastic reaction was, "I can't believe we made it this far without a robot vacume cleaner". I understand where he is coming from, but I don't have a cleaning person come to my house.

    My wife and I both work and my dog sheds, this leaves both very little time for the vacuming and a very large need for vacuming. We struggled with the $200 purchase for about 6 months, but have not regretted it for 1 second since laying down the money. (Check techbargains.com, you can find it for $160 delievered).

    The roomba is right for us because we always found the vacume to be a chore. If you don't feel the same way, you probably don't need a roomba. As far as performance goes, every time the thing runs it fills it's little bin. The amount of dust that it picks up is remarkable. It can easily go under our bed, when was the last time you vacumed under the bed? I totally agree with one review I found that said the fact that you have to empty the little bin is (accidental?) marketing genius. Every time we use it we are encouraged to use it again, and soon!

    It doesn't do stairs, doesn't handle the corners of some throw rugs well, and doesn't handle shag at all. We have to pick up the clothes/objects/garbage before using it (the horror). I really haven't found much to be upset about.

    I put it in the iPod, VW Beetle, iMac, and Tivo category. It does something well, it's not perfect, but it's really cool. I didn't think I'd ever feel this way about a vacume.

  116. Battlebots? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Anybody else now have an intense desire to see this thing go a round on Battlebots?

    "Awww look, its trying to sweep up the ***SMASH***.......oh....

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  117. I didn't vote for him by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 1

    Hey, don't look at me. I voted for Roommatic.

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
  118. Competing product? Do you people read??? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    The Roomba costs $199.

    This thing is $40.

    At what point does common sense kick in with you folks? This obviously does not compete on features or price. It's just a cheap knock-off. The fact that everyone's making fun of something that's so obviously SUPPOSED to be a cheap little piece of shit that costs $39.95 is testament to the retardedness of slashdot.

    Tune in next week, when slashdot figures out that a Yugo doesn't compete with a Mercedes S-class.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  119. Arthur C. Clarke? by mahler3 · · Score: 1
    Where did this phrase came from? I read it many times here.

    I don't have a copy in front of me, but it reminds me of something from Childhood's End.

  120. No! The Simpsons you moron! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the Newscaster that said that!

  121. Cleaning GF grills by Xlucid · · Score: 1
    The dirt on it after cooking is either crusty, brittle and easily removed mechanically (e.g. melted cheese solids that bake on to the surface)or solidified grease and fat (or a matrix material composed of particles of the former embedded in a sea of the latter).

    I find the best way to clean one of these is not to wash it, but instead:
    • Let it cool down.
    • Remove any large brittle stuff with a plastic spatula.
    • Switch on the grill. (Yes, I said on).
      Obviously, for any readers in litigious USA, I mean this only for GF grill users who have successfully gained a certificate in GF grill-cleaning from a suitably qualified training provider. This method is not to be used by uncertified GF grill cleaners, except wholly at their own risk.
    • Get a wad of kitchen roll, and wipe the grease off. This is now easy to do as most of it is still solid, but the stuff actually attached to the grill surface is now melting.
  122. Re:No! The Simpsons you moron! by mahler3 · · Score: 1
    If missing one episode of The Simpsons makes me a moron... well, better that than an A.C. ;-)

    FWIW, Childhood's End by Arthur C. Clarke is a good read, overlords and all.