Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake 9.2 RC1

RabidChipmunk writes "Mandrake 9.2RC1 is out. Go get it with bit-torrent and speed up my download. I like the idea that posting to Slashdot could actually speed up a download. It seems so wrong." If you're on a slow pipe, don't underestimate the throughput of the postal system. Mark Walker writes "Mandrake Linux 9.2 RC1 is appearing on mirrors as I type this. We're currently downloading it from Mandrake, for http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com."

355 comments

  1. Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by mattrix2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    The following message was presented by http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com for all your budget linux cds!

    "Mandrake Linux 9.2 RC1 is appearing on mirrors as I type this. We're currently downloading it from Mandrake, for http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com."
    I'm sorry, but this is a blatant advert. Why did the editors include that?
    --matt from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com

    Go to http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com
    Thats right folks, http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com
    Don't forget, http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com

    1. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by Organized+Konfusion · · Score: 1

      just FTP it.

    2. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you're not on 56k then ?

    3. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by Lxy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's ok. They'll be /.'d to hell and learn not to advertise here.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    4. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by JTunny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not everybody is on broadband and not all advertising is evil.

      If I was on a slow connection, $2 a CD would seem an absolute bargain/life-saver.

    5. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by mshiltonj · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...not all advertising is evil...

      What you say?!

    6. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by amcguinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How is it any more an advert than the main story itself, which is an advert for Mandrake?

      Slashdot frequently runs stories about new products of interest, from gadgets to applications. Both Mandrake's new release, and budgetlinuxcds copies of it fall into this category

    7. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of three CDRoms sent via snail mail.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    8. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by cnb · · Score: 1

      Did you even read the blurb?

      It mentions the download is available from Bit Torrent for free.

      If you don't know what that is try,
      http://bitconjurer.org/BitTorrent/

      budgetlinuxcds.com mentions on their front page that,

      Linux is free, we all know this - you just have to have a fast internet connection to be able to download the 1.2Gigabytes of data, and a CD burner to make the CDs, so that you can install it. Not really available to everyone.
      This is where we can help!

      I don't see what the crib is? If you have another resource for people to get their iso just post it.

    9. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by cheesybagel · · Score: 0, Redundant
      ...not all advertising is evil...

      What you say?!

      You have no chance to survive make your time.
      Ha Ha Ha Ha ....

    10. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      But all dialup is evil. Sometimes those of us in Canada (or those in South Korea) need to get reminded that there are still people who have to use dialup... I bet that it would also shock some that there are people who (hold on to your hats) choose to us dialup.

      *shudder*

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    11. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by Gherald · · Score: 1

      From the site:

      "We've been Slashdotted!. Please bear with us as we try to hold up against the strain."

    12. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by JCCyC · · Score: 2, Funny

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of three CDRoms sent via snail mail.

      Yes, but the ping times suck.

    13. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by slacktop · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else find it ironic that the "Ads by Google" banner ad at the top of Budget Linux CD listed 2 competitors?

    14. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by rgbrenner · · Score: 1

      lol.. yeah.. one of them is ours... but it didnt bring much traffic to our site... I didnt even notice until you said something though...

    15. Re:Message from http://www.budgetlinuxcds.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And its whining snivling comments like this that make slashdot the irrelevent crap it is.

      Make one mistaken click and boom.. drivel.

  2. is this an advertisement? by dnotj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No content in the links....just a link to the .tor's and some cd seller. Hello editors?

    --
    No more Micro$oft bashing from me. Its like bashing at the special olympics.
    1. Re:is this an advertisement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously. What are we supposed to talk about in this thread?

    2. Re:is this an advertisement? by TheLevelHeadedOne · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think we're supposed to sit back, laugh at, and talk about the bit torrent downloaders because most of them will finish downloading about the same time as the cheap cd would arrive...

      --

      Twin or more? ITA
      Apache/Spring/La
    3. Re:is this an advertisement? by PhilippeT · · Score: 1

      I got it runnig how do i make a screenshot of it's install... pure genious

      I let my gf try to install it. She knows nothing of linux else then Tux. She was able to install it 100% working and was surfing the net and watching movies on kabootle in no time.

      Also the boot up is great for those who panic at seeing lines of text fly by.

      Im going to be moving all my relatives boxes to the drake :)

      --
      A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
  3. reviews? by sujan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    are there any previews of this? Screenshots?

    Used mandrake few years ago, it was too bloated for my taste but I'd recommend it to anyone willing to try linux.

    1. Re:reviews? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Mandrake is still fairly big if you do a default install, but it's nicely integrated and comfortable. I prefer redhat, but that's just cuz I run a minimal machine (firbird,openoffice,netbeans and perl stuff)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    2. Re:reviews? by kg9ov · · Score: 1

      I prefer redhat, but that's just cuz I run a minimal machine

      There is only one word to describe that: oxymoron

    3. Re:reviews? by Raagshinnah · · Score: 1

      sure here's a screenshot of it from my friend(i run debian): mandrakebox:/var/log#

    4. Re:reviews? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Well, minimal for a desktop. I don't need to use one of the 'distros on a disk'. I'd just as soon avoid distro snobbism these days. There is no one 'best' distribution, it depends on your needs.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    5. Re:reviews? by kg9ov · · Score: 1

      It's not that I have anything against RedHat. I'm typing this on a RH9 box. I just find it funny that you would think that Mandrake is "fairly big" and RedHat is "minimal".

    6. Re:reviews? by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      That's true... I meant when you install all the Mandrake apps, but I shoulda stated that.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    7. Re:reviews? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terms like "bloated" are so relative... it gets the 486 geeks coming out of the woodwork ready flame. Heck I remember back when people were saying that RH 6.1 was bloated. Maybe it had something to do with the name...

  4. heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "It seems so wrong"...but it feels so right!

  5. If you're downloading torrents on Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try the Burst! client. It is great.

  6. RC1 ?? by AftanGustur · · Score: 5, Insightful


    RC1 = Release Candidate #1

    Usually followed by RC2 etc ...

    I know Mandrake absolutely rocks, but isn't this a bit to much, making a /. story out of the first RC ??

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    1. Re:RC1 ?? by Eric+Destiny · · Score: 0

      You must be new to Slashdot. Bill Gates taking a shit is a newsworthy story around here.

      --

      "The meek shall inherit the earth, the rest of us shall go to the stars." Isaac Asimov

    2. Re:RC1 ?? by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

      Bill Gates took a shit!?!?!?!?!?

      When, where, how! Did it have peanuts in it?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:RC1 ?? by chicagoan · · Score: 1

      If you think making a story out of RC1 is bad,
      slashdot had a story for Mandrake 9.2 beta 1 just a few weeks ago.

    4. Re:RC1 ?? by WNight · · Score: 1

      Mandrake is probably the most-used distro by people on Slashdot (the single most, not that over 50% of the Linux users use it) so this is directly relevant to many people on here.

      There's also the issue of getting the pre-release versions tested. If these things don't hit Slashdot, fewer people will know and thus fewer people will test.

    5. Re:RC1 ?? by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 1


      I know Mandrake absolutely rocks, but isn't this a bit to much, making a /. story out of the first RC ??


      if a story doesn't interest you much, don't read it dude. there's already enough pointless spam posting and crapfloods already. like this one.

  7. Why? by toupsie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's new with Mandrake in this release? I didn't see anything in the story brief and I am too lazy to search for the info. I don't follow this distro (Im a RedHat user) but I would like to know what warrants a RC release story on the front of Slashdot. Is there some sort of whizbang feature that I don't know I need to have? Enlighten me!

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  8. Come on everybody, let's slashdot this little fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do it do it do it doi plz

  9. Please join the mandrake club. by HanzoSan · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Dont just "steal" Linux, join the club and help pay for development of future versions of Linux Mandrake.

    This company is in serious financial trouble right now and they NEED our help, so if you download and like Mandrake please join the club! By joining the club you are helping yourself, you are going to get better higher quality software so consider it an investment in your own future.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
      Dont just "steal" Linux, join the club and help pay for development of future versions of Linux Mandrake.

      Um, I thought our practice of buying the top-of-the-line retail package was the proper way to "pay for development" of Mandrake?

    2. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Mandrake was already dead!

    3. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How about not joining, using, or paying for it? Sounds like a good option to me. There are lots of companies out there making Linux products that aren't asking for money.

      How do I know they're not using the club to give their CEOs higher salaries without changing the status of development? How are they accountable to their users?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    4. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Please don't use the term "steal Linux," as it implies that anyone who potentially downloads it is a thief. It is very insulting and moreover an incorrect term to use in this context. "Freeload" would be a more apppropriate term. Even then, the company knew what it was getting into when it decided to try and sell a product that could be given away freely, so a "freeloader" in the traditional sense it not necessarily abusing the system.

      That said, I've purchased two Mandrake retail products (@ USD70 each) in the last couple years. I'm not very social and clubs are too touchy-feely for me.

    5. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, Mandrake SA is publicly traded in France. You can go to their website and look at their financial statements yourself.

    6. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No thanks, I like using it for free. If they go out of business and won't provide their distribution for free, I'll just use another one. There's always a good distro for free out there.

    7. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression that being released as free software meant that it was free.

      How exactly is downloading without giving them money "stealing"?

      Has the whole attitude of free software changed?

      I never really thought 1 company would be successful selling free software, but there seem to be dozens. Color me surprised.

      I am in the process of deciding what distro to try out, and Mandrake is in the final 3. No, I'm not going to pay to try it out. I'm not even going to pay for it if I keep using it but am not that impressed. Heck, I probably won't pay for it at all.

      On the other hand, I will probably help with bugfinding, patching, testing, etc. I might even talk good about whichever distro I end up liking best.

      But I'm not going to correct a transgression that does not exist.

      Using freely distribut[ed|able] software and not paying for it is not stealing.

      Grr.

    8. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Mandrake users are getting in the way of me actually trying Mandrake again. Everytime some beta release or something in the news comes out on Mandrake there all these beggers show up asking for money. "Don't steal ... join the Mandrake club" blah blah blah blah ... how many times do I have to listen to this crap. If Mandrake didn't annoy the living hell out of me the first 10 minutes of using it I might join the Mandrake club. The last time I used it I tried using the install windows fonts feature and it set up the permissions wrong causing all my fonts to show up as little boxes. Please for the love of open source and all that is holy quit posting this Mandrake needs money crap!!!!

    9. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by DaveOke · · Score: 1

      It's not stealing... When you download the version from their site, you get only a download distro... No tech support, or anything from Mandrake. When you purchase a distro from their web site, you get technical support, many more cds or dvds, documentation and manuals. Please don't get this confused

    10. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by HanzoSan · · Score: 0



      Because if their CEO wanted high salaries they wouldnt be developing Mandrake Linux for the user, they'd be acting like SCO, or acting pro business like Redhat.

      This isnt about money for Mandrake, if it were, they'd make you pay $99 a year like Lindows.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    11. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Flamebait



      Hey thats your loss AC, just because you like using things for free doesnt mean free will continue to exist if you abuse it. If everyone were like you, then there would be no Linux, I mean if it were all about free, well Linux would still be commandline.

      Why dont you go use your pirated copy of Windows, its free and its designed for people like you.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    12. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Troll



      The same way the RIAA says you are stealing if you dont buy music.

      Look I'm not saying its stealing, but Linux is not free software, it never was.

      Linux mandrake is a distro, people pay for it, its not free to develop it.

      I never really thought 1 company would be successful selling free software, but there seem to be dozens. Color me surprised.


      You are an idiot AC, they arent selling free software, they are selling services. The Linux industry is a service based industry, they dont sell products. When I tell you to pay Mandrakesoft I dont mean buy the stupid CD, I mean pay for the services, including the code production service. I mean you do want a Mandrake X dont you? OR do you want Mandrake 9 to be the last version of Mandrake ever produced? Its up to you.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    13. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Vann_v2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why should I join the Mandrake club? It provides nothing I want and would amount to nothing but a donation for me. If you want people to donate to Mandrake, shut up about this "stealing" nonsense and say, "Please give money to Mandrake." And I mean "give" in the strictest sense.

      I refuse to pay for goods or services that aren't worth their cost.

    14. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by digime · · Score: 1

      Don't just "steal" Linux

      That was modded insightful? Perhaps those moderators should acquaint themselves with GNU/Linux/OSS/GPL... You cannot steal what is given for free.

      ...you are going to get better higher quality software...

      Better than who? I think you mean a higher quality distribution of the free software you're not directly contributing to. Which is not a bad thing. But you need to give the OSS software projects donations for better software.

      I agree with the spirit of this post, that everyone should contribute whatever they can, in whatever form, to support Linux. If we don't nobody will. When Linux is on Joe Sixpack's home computer, he's not going to understand or give a crap about the spirit of OSS.

    15. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you've paid SCO $600 per CPU, you ***ARE*** stealing linux.

    16. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Arandir · · Score: 1

      It's not "stealing" as several others have said. By downloading this, people are using their free-as-in-speech rights to silently but definitively assert that the GPL means "free-as-in-beer".

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    17. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What club is this that is touchy-feely again?

    18. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      I paid for 9.1, and when 9.2 is formally released, I'll probably pay for that too. Shipping from France takes FOREVER though.

    19. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by madpuppy · · Score: 1

      well I wouldn't call mandrakeclub touchy-feely, it is just a great way to support Mandrake directly while maximising your investment in the distro, with Mandrakeclub you get to download programs that you generally wouldn't get with the download version of mandrake, plus for 60.00 a year I cannot see why anyone would bitch about unlimited downloads and upgrades from Mandrake. plus if the avarage linux company releases 2 distro versions a year at anywhere between 40.00 to 80.00 you are ahead of the game with being a club member.
      But, that is just my view of the club, if they provided nothing substantial I wouldn't waste my time.

    20. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      "steal"? Firstly, fuck you, buddy. Secondly, what's Mandrake's business plan to get itself off of welfare? Why should I piss money down that particular drain?

      I'm open to reasoned persuasion, but not to empty emotional emotional rhetoric.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    21. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Linux is not free software, it never was."

      Yes it is and it always has been.

    22. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Maintech · · Score: 1

      I bought my first mandrake when 7.0 was first released. I have had every build since. I no longer buy but download the iso's. I joined the club when Mandrake was in peak danger of going bankrupt. I am a silver. I hope I helped keep them from bankruptcy. I am not wealthy but I think that some ideas are worth investing in. A desktop linux is one of those ideas. I have used every version of window$ since 3.0. (DOS before that). Linux has yet to come up with a destop O.S. that is as easy for beginners to use as window$. That linux will catch and pass window$ is my great hope. For experienced users of the nix O.S.'s Linux if FAR better than window$. But, linux is still between win3.0 and win95. A lot of setting MUST be set manually. If my contributions to the Club help get Mandrake up to the ease of XP in a shorter time then I will pay what I must.

    23. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Xelent · · Score: 1

      For software, I believe in the mechanisms of the market.

      Most of the apps for linux in general are alpha and beta stage, very often lacking user-friendliness and ease of installation/use.

      This does not mean, however, that Linux in general has no interest to end-users like myself.

      When apps become user-friedly and reasonably easy to install, end-users will know to appreciate this. For example Opera for linux, which is a masterpiece and shows good craftmanship.

      When more apps equal or better in quality and performance compared to Opera is made for Linux, people will know to appreciate it, and it will become a licensed product that people will and must pay to use.

      There are some factors behind this.

      To develop a top notch product, you need top notch people. Developers that writes some code on the weekends, is bound to produce inferior products compared to those companies that have hired professionals that not only work 8 or more hours a day on developing the software, but also can focuse on tasks in the specific project they are experienced/educated in.

      As a Mandrake Linux user, who once in a while gets forced over to "the other side", I do not believe in charity bringing Linux to the next level. The next level can not be something like MS Windows, simply because Linux is based on a much too professional and well-made fundament: The Linux Kernel.

      The next level for Linux, will be a level never seen before: a stable and user friendly OS that will make the world forget that Microsoft ever existed.

    24. Re:Please join the mandrake club. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I refuse to pay for goods or services that aren't worth their cost.

      Look at the desktop and servers OS market in general. How much do you think the Mandrake Linux distribution is worth ?

      Keep in mind you get a whole bunch of included software with Linux.. thing you rarely get with other OS.

      wacky

  10. Good news for Mandrake users. by Meat+Blaster · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It was one of the distributions I tried after deciding to move off of Slackware a couple of years ago. Looked like it would be nice and simple for people who were just starting out with Linux but didn't really want to learn that much about it, but unfortunately all that only gets in the way when you're actually trying to do something meaningful with your installation. Lots and lots of stuff in the commercial pack to play around with if that's your bag, though.

    I have to say that after trying all of them (Red Hat, Mandrake, Debian, Gentoo) that only Gentoo really seemed to be a power-user distribution. Course that means you spend more time fixing than getting done, but boy is it fast once you get the system up and running.

    1. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      "Only Gentoo"??? But you used to use Slackware! Ooh, I'm telling Bob Dobbs!

      But, seriously, though...

      Don't you think that Slackware is as close to a pure-geek Linux as you can get? Small, clean, up to date, low memory and disk requirements, fast as hell... I haven't tried Gentoo, but leaving Slackware out seems kinda harsh, doesn't it?

      Come on, man... Show some slack! ;)

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    2. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually started on Slack (for whatever sick masochistic reason) and then tried Redhat, SuSE, and Mandrake. In the end I went back at Slackware and have stayed there happily ever after.

    3. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mandrake Expatriate Syndrome

      Yeah, those Gentoo "optimizations" are really something.

    4. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      I believe that our good friend Meat Blaster was talking about distroshe tried after making the decision to move away from the aging Slackware. Your description of Slackware applies to Gentoo as well; Gentoo just makes things slicker with the portage system. You set up your compiler flags, and just run emerge on the package to grab up-to-date source and compile it optimized for your machine. It even requires you to build and configure your own kernel, which can be fun if you have extra time on your hands.

    5. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      but boy is it fast once you get the system up and running.

      Huh?

      Where does this alleged speed come from (in principle)? Do you have any statistics or are you just spouting typical Gentoo crap?

    6. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to have a small base footprint for an install. It's another thing to have a small selection of packages available. Gentoo isn't quite up to the Debian level of packages, but it's got a very wide range.

      Plus, for added geek factor you compile everything from source. Everything. It can take a couple of days to get a system up to speed. And then once you're up and running, some package maintainer will update an ebuild, you'll do an 'emerge sync; emerge -u world' and your favorite package will suddenly break or change in odd little ways. My latest favorite is how the recent Gentoo ebuilds of the GIMP don't have any printing facility by default. Some -u upgrade!

      --
      I do not have a signature
    7. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Small, clean, up to date, low memory and disk requirements, fast as hell...
      Bah! Spend a weekend and do it yourself.
    8. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by iantri · · Score: 1

      Aging? Slackware is still under development and the last release had GCC 3.2.2, kernel 2.4.20, KDE 3.1 and Gnome 2.2.

    9. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Richard+Platt · · Score: 1

      > Plus, for added geek factor you compile everything from source. Everything.

      What about the compiler?

    10. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by iantri · · Score: 1
      Err.. I am not a Gentoo fanatic and have never used it, but since you compile EVERYTHING when you install Gentoo, all is compiled with the appropriate optimizations for your processor, hence the speed increase.

      Not to mention, AFAIK you don't end up with a million and one useless daemons starting a la RedHat or Mandrake (yes, they are bad for this.)

    11. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by mickwd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Looked like it would be nice and simple for people who were just starting out with Linux.....but unfortunately all that only gets in the way when you're actually trying to do something meaningful with your installation."

      Eh?

      You're not compelled to use all of Mandrake's GUI and command-line tools all the time. If you find the GUI tools restrictive, then use the normal vi/emacs/iptables/ifconfig/whatever...... provided in exactly the same manner as on every other Linux distribution.

      Mandrake's tools are provided in addition to the standard unix/GNU/Linux utilities - not instead of them.

    12. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      There is an install option to compile the compiler with optimizations for your system before even beginning to compile the rest of the system.

      Not my idea of fun but it could make the rest of your compiling faster.

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    13. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      EVERYTHING when you install Gentoo, all is compiled with the appropriate optimizations for your processor, hence the speed increase.

      I can't really see that much potential for a performance increase even if you compare programs run under i386 and i686 kernels.

      Not to mention, AFAIK you don't end up with a million and one useless daemons starting a la RedHat or Mandrake (yes, they are bad for this.)

      Another point of view would be: with Gentoo you end up with a minimally useful system and you'll have to work to get all the daemons you need on-line.

      When it comes to Linux, I'd rather like the RedHat way. Every possible driver has been compiled as a module and if you add a new card, a network card for instance, it's recognized and the relevant daemons are set up on reboot.

    14. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Richard+Platt · · Score: 1

      My comment was really just a remark on some of the Gentoo zealots' claims (not referring to the original poster here), specifically the "compiling everything yourself good" one.

      I tried Gentoo once. Spending days watching my system compile for a dubious performance increase doesn't seem much fun to me. How, exactly, does "compiling for your system" improve performance? Sure, you can select the optimizations you want, but that's not the same as optimizing for your system in particular.

      Personally, I'll just trust Mandrake to do a decent job as standard rather than try Gentoo again. But each to their own.

    15. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by deathcow · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Without a lot of experience with various distributions I cannot agree or disagree, but I can say this:

      We are using Mandrake 9.1 to push (finally) into some Linux installs at work in a classically Windows only environment. Overall, it has been a success.

      We have two basic flavors of machines we build with Mandrake 9.1: "surveillance" boxes, and LAMP servers.

      Surveillance boxes have 6 to 8 LCD monitors and are running icewm, or KDE (not decided yet), with Xinerama enabled. These boxes are replacing Windows NT machines that used Exceed to run X applications. Now they natively run on the Xfree86 server, and they work great with Xinerama and all those monitors. POW! No more Windows licenses! POW! No more Exceed licenses! These boxes use a single (AGP) Matrox G550 running two heads, and then four to six (PIC) TNT2 cards to bring the machine up to six or eight monitors total. These machines are appliance like, if one dropped, we build another to replace it, lickety split.

      Our LAMP servers are more simple.. built in (single head) motherboard video, networking, and a single IDE hard drive. Cron'd rsyncs back up our data off the LAMP servers and onto another Linux box for "up to the hour" protection.

      Installing Mandrake is interesting! You can do the same sequence of events on different motherboard types, and end up with different packages installed on the machine. (I kid you not.) "Ummm, no rsh this time!" etc. So, we have carefully written installation procedures which also check that every package we use was installed, and install if it not.

      Overall, I've got to give Mandrake Installer a B+ or A-, it does work, it's fast. Just gotta watch which packages get put on. By the way, we dont let Mandrake install the LAMP stuff, we do that manually after the machine is up and running.

    16. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is you stupid fuck, you just don't know how to set the CFlags correctly.

    17. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      According to tests Slashdot has posted here before, Gentoo is no faster than other distros. The important thing to compile is the kernel. Everything else doesn't matter all that much.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    18. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by HiThere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suppose that:
      1) you include only what you want
      2) you compile it for the processor on your machine
      3) ???
      4) speed-up

      I understand that this used to be really significant, but I haven't heard many such claims recently. Personally, I wouldn't trust my choices of what to staticly link into the kernel vs. what to have dynamically loaded to be better than that of an expert, say the people who put together Mandrake, or Red Hat. If they don't think that the kernel really benefits by being compiled for a pentium rather than a 386, then maybe it doesn't. Mandrake said it did, Red Hat said it didn't... and when I compared how they felt on the same machine, Red Hat felt faster. Of course, Mandrake had all these extra bells and whistles... but then that's the point, isn't it. The compilation speedup can easily be totally swamped by the choice of applications.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    19. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Depending on the type of CPU in your machine, compiling for that specific architecture could make a big difference-- in theory. In practice I have no hard evidence of my own. But I would hope that being able to target the Athlon XP over, say, the generic 386 is some sort of optimization (beyond simply being able to set the -O flag to 11).

      And actually, compiling the compiler is probably one of the few places in Gentoo where this is most important. After all, with the right optimizations, maybe your "days watching [your] system compile" could have been a day less-- compiling an entire system worth of software is pretty CPU-intense after all. I doubt the optimizations matter so much in an email client or a text editor (both of which probably spend 99% of their time waiting for user input).

      --
      I do not have a signature
    20. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by scosol · · Score: 1

      hmmm i've used gentoo for a while now...

      i consider myself more a "power configurator" than a "power user" :P

      --
      I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
    21. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, we dont let Mandrake install the LAMP stuff, we do that manually after the machine is up and running.

      And then you pay MySQL AB for a license, right? Right?

      Or is your code GPLed?

    22. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Have you tried saving an auto-install floppy after the installation? More information can be found here.

    23. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 1

      And then you pay MySQL AB for a license, right?

      What for? There's absolutely no need to buy a license to install it.

      http://www.mysql.com/products/licensing.html

      Quit the trolling...

    24. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      By the way, we dont let Mandrake install the LAMP stuff, we do that manually after the machine is up and running.

      Well, I know at least one person who would be interested to know why you don't like the A and P parts of the LAMP, since the A part has more modules, all of which work out-the-box, than any other distro, and there's nothing wrong with the P part.

      If you're interested, you could ensure that you don't have to roll your own (and maintain your own) LAMP stuff.

    25. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What for? There's absolutely no need to buy a license to install it.

      I'm not trolling, I just think the MySQL license is a lot more stringent than you imply. The MySQL license requires a commercial license if the user "distributes" the software, "be that internally or externally".

      What exactly does "internal distribution" mean? Downloading MySQL and installing on multiple servers within a company is surely "internal distribution", isn't it? Creating software as a contractor and then installing MySQL at the client site surely constitutes distribution, doesn't it?

      Some people maintain so, and I'm genuinely confused--could you enlighten me? See this point and this one.

    26. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by mantera · · Score: 1

      Good news for Mandrake users. (Score:2, Interesting) by Meat Blaster (578650) on Wednesday August 27, @06:30PM (#6806950) "It was one of the distributions I tried after deciding to move off of Slackware a couple of years ago." why did you decide to move off of slackware, if i may ask? *pure curiosity*

    27. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't let Mandrake install linux?
      LAMP

    28. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by deathcow · · Score: 1
      While Mandrake 9.1 permits you to select Apache, MySQL and PHP for install during the initial installation, I found that it simply did not yield a working setup. Meaning, it was unable to execute PHP pages with Apache which could successfully query and display information from a MySQL database. Evidently, throwing the Apache, MySQL and PHP packages onto a box doesn't yield a LAMP server.

      I used a variation of this guys LAMP install process. It worked first time. Also got to see how fast a 2.4 Ghz P4 compiles stuff like Apache. Very nice!

    29. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by deathcow · · Score: 1

      1) We dont distribute ANY code, GPL or otherwise.

      2) We dont make a dime with any of our software.

      3) Actually, our department generates no income whatsoever for our company.

      4) We buy EVERY required license of EVERY commercial piece of software we are aware of using.

      5) If MySQL REQUIRES us to purchase a license for the above described use of the product, we would do so. We've never heard of that being a requirement.

    30. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by deathcow · · Score: 1

      No, I hadn't heard of this, and I appreciate the suggestion. Thanks, I'll check it out because we wondered if we could automate the install to some degree.

    31. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Slackware's hardly "aging". I think it's pretty up to date. Besides, maybe he's got something against it, but still, he just left it out of his final analysis entirely, which I felt seemed somewhat unfair.

      It seems to me that Slackware has a lot going for it. Maybe he was using a really old version...

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    32. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Ok, you can look at Slackware's not choosing to dump a zillion software packages onto your PC as a bad thing if you want, but I personally prefer it that way. I can install a Slackware system, then go to Sourceforge and get whatever else I need, and end up with a small, tight, fast system that works exactly the way I want it to. I see this as a feature, not a bug. For a long time I've been annoyed by commercial Linux's tendency to install everything and the kitchen sink by default. It's not just a disk hog, it's a security problem, you know? All those open ports and setuid scripts? Think about it.

      Slackware is a nice system for this exact reason. You know exactly what you're getting, and you're in control of it. You know what I mean?

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    33. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      No, we let it install Windows. Then we run a Mandrake DLL which is as good as Linux, and run that in a CMD window in XP under Windows 95 mode. That right there is way more robust than straight out Mandrake. Then we install LAMP in that environs. It's great, but we have to compile and install LAMP each time we reboot. Still, obviously worth it.

    34. Re:Good news for Mandrake users. by Meat+Blaster · · Score: 1
      I wanted to make the switch from libc5 to glibc much more quickly than Slackware would permit it to happen. There was a binary-only application or game at the time that wasn't being compiled against libc5, and I discovered a few incompatibilities between Slackware binaries and glibc after I compiled and installed it. A couple of years ago was actually something like four or five according to my backup history. Tried Debian, which I kind of liked but lost interest in after a couple of major packages were severely delayed, and am now at Gentoo.

      Actually, I really liked Slackware, and am still using it in a somewhat minor role as an internal server. If anything keeps me from going back to it, it's my lack of trust in myself to keep the binaries up to date on any distribution that cannot simplify the process to a handful of commands. But it was ideal to learn on back when I was starting out (download A, AP, D, N, and occasionally games... what were they, Y?)

  11. as Linus said ... by Abm0raz · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you're on a slow pipe, don't underestimate the throughput of the postal system.

    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with back-up tapes." -Linus

    -Ab

    --
    Nothing fails quite like prayer.
    1. Re:as Linus said ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with back-up tapes." -Linus

      I know he's your Personal Deity, but this is hardly original with him.

    2. Re:as Linus said ... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I thought that was tannenbaum?

    3. Re:as Linus said ... by ianezz · · Score: 3, Funny
      Revisionism?

      That quote actually is by Andrew Tanenbaum (from "Computer Networks"):

      "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway."

      Instead, this one has been attributed to Linus:

      Real Men don't make backups. They upload it via ftp and let the world mirror it.

    4. Re:as Linus said ... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Big deal, slashbots drag out the old "64k is all you'll ever need" quote from Bill Gates, though he never said it.

      I find it funny that it's since been upgraded to "640k is all you'll ever need".

      The big difference is that this misquote is modded "insightful".

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:as Linus said ... by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      No, the misquote has always been 640k, because that's the base amount of RAM accesable in DOS. 64k is as random as attributing, "512k of ram is enough for anybody!" to him.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    6. Re:as Linus said ... by WNight · · Score: 1

      Correction, he *claims* he never said it. I wouldn't own up to it either if I said that. It's inconclusive.

      Also, the quote was 640k in its original context. That's the ammount of memory under 1MB that a MS-DOS has to run a program it, minus some TSR space, unless it loads segments of the program into high memory. While early PCs did ship with very little memory, there was no hard-coded 64k limit and Bill was never in a position to comment on these, being a software guy and that simply being a matter of installing more ram chips. The 640k is his "fault" though.

    7. Re:as Linus said ... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Nah, I first heard the quote back before the PC days, and it was in reference to subroutine design (64k of stack space), not the entire machine.

      He never said it.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    8. Re:as Linus said ... by ianezz · · Score: 1

      Uhm, I believe it was the CP/M guys saying something along the lines of "64KB should be enough".

    9. Re:as Linus said ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This joke ran its course 10 years ago.

  12. Re:here comes the torre%BVNO CARRIER by error502 · · Score: 1

    All three torrents are working fine for me.

    However, the second and third torrents do not have any seeds. The second only has 0.409 distributed copies, and the third only has 0.364. The first one, however, has eight seeds and 2.983 distributed copies.

  13. If you'd bothered looking on Mandrake's website... by adrianbaugh · · Score: 4, Funny

    This has been out for ages. I would have played with it over a week ago but I couldn't face grabbing ISOs over a 56k line :-) Actually, I'd just be finishing about now...

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  14. Mandrake is my best friend - at home by Goyuix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So for home use - Mandrake has always been the sweet spot - excellent NTFS support out of the box as well just generally very user friendly interface... not the heavyweight server backend that other distros are... My 2 cents...

    1. Re:Mandrake is my best friend - at home by stibnite · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but have they delivered on what really counts? I want to see some earth tones, and some new pastels in the gui.

    2. Re:Mandrake is my best friend - at home by revmoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So for home use - Mandrake has always been the sweet spot - excellent NTFS support out of the box as well just generally very user friendly interface... not the heavyweight server backend that other distros are... My 2 cents...

      Care to enlighten me on what you mean by "excellent NTFS support"? As in, what sets Mandrake apart from all the other distro's NTFS support?

      Seeing as how, you either have it enabled in the kernel, or you don't, it's not like one distro can have _better_ support for it than another... or is there something I'm not getting?

      --
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    3. Re:Mandrake is my best friend - at home by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 3, Informative

      When installing Mandrake, you can carve off a piece of an existing NTFS partition to use.

      Link

    4. Re:Mandrake is my best friend - at home by aldoman · · Score: 1

      It also comes with it installed by default, RedHat doesn't include it for 'legal' reasons. Along with mp3 support...

    5. Re:Mandrake is my best friend - at home by swv3752 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It exists out of the box, unlike certain others. Plus they do have nice resizing tools that can do NTFS partitions.

      It also makes a decent server and the GUI tools are otpional. I think a minimal install weighs in about 60mb.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  15. Re:here comes the torre%BVNO CARRIER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The second and third each have one seed now. The first has ten seeds.

  16. Re:here comes the torre%BVNO CARRIER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    what? what the hell did you just say? 0.409 distributed copies?

    I mean, I thought jigdo and dselect were confusing, but this is in a class of its own.

  17. Changelog by nstrom · · Score: 5, Informative

    Changelog is here: http://www3.mandrakelinux.com/en/92beta.php3

    Corrections from beta1 include:

    - Rpmdrake now functional
    - Upgrade from former versions now fully handled
    - New windows are now conveniently centered

    Urpmi and rpmdrake still complain about missing key. This issue should be fixed in the next beta.

    Improvements:

    - First version of Netprofile, the new network profiles manager designed for users who connect to multiple networks. Feedback is highly requested for this newly introduced feature.
    - Complete rewrite of userdrake (user management) in Gtk2
    - New bootsplash (graphical boot) with graphical design not completed
    - Improved localization
    - New font support for Indian
    - Enhanced drakTermServ (terminal server configurator).

    New software versions:

    - KDE 3.1.3
    - GNOME 2.3.5
    - Evolution 1.4.4
    - Openldap 2.1.22
    - kerberos5 1.3

    1. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corrections from beta1 include:

      There was a beta 2, this changelog is 'old'...

      RC1 is after beta 2. The plan is to have another RC and then final (mid-september)

    2. Re:Changelog by nstrom · · Score: 1

      Anonymous Coward wrote on Wednesday August 27, @02:37PM:
      > There was a beta 2, this changelog is 'old'...
      >
      > RC1 is after beta 2. The plan is to have another RC and then final (mid-september)

      You seem to be right, AC... Well, Mandrake's site doesn't seem to have a changelog for either RC then. Presumably they're just bugfixes of the betas; I don't know Mandrakesoft's feature freeze policy but features aren't generally added to release candidates...

    3. Re:Changelog by nstrom · · Score: 1

      s/either/this/

    4. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, Cooker is frozen until final is shipped.

      Three weeks of bug fixing, oh joy :)

    5. Re:Changelog by N7DR · · Score: 1
      Changelog is here: http://www3.mandrakelinux.com/en/92beta.php3

      That's the changelog for beta2. The story is about RC1.

    6. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > New bootsplash (graphical boot) with graphical design ...

      I thaugt that doesn't work with 2.6 Kernels. Does it mean the next Mandrake release will be based on the 2.4.x Kernel?
      Nothing bad about it, but the new kernel is running pretty good and i don't want to miss some of it's features. Mandrake were always the first to include beta versions in their releases.

    7. Re:Changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * slow boot

    8. Re:Changelog by purple+pixel · · Score: 1

      Why is it that the line 'rpmdrake now working' seems to appear in the release notes for just about every release of mandrake linux?

      I'm currently running suse 8.2 (switched from mandrake to suse 8.1 back in mdk 8.2 days) but have used mandrake a fair bit in the past.

      Mandrake 9.0 and later all seem to have broken tools in one way or another. Wizards just crash without warning (eg. the proxy server [squid] wizard in 9.1). There was no way to set up internet sharing without dhcp...leaving me to set up masquerading by hand via the ip masquerading howto. I once managed to set up my dialup internet connection using mdk 9.1. Later the system started behaving very strange - with complete lockups about once a week, whilst browsing the net with konqueror, and applications not firing up when launching them from the desktop and many other things which frustrated the hell out of me.

      There's a lot of things I like about mandrake, but so far i have found the overall quality of suse distros to be far superior. I'm probably just very fussy, but mandrake seems to have a lot of rough edges - minor issues that have been overlooked. I also couldn't get my dialup setup again the second time I installed it (i've been using mandrake/suse for over 2 years now and installed both many times). The mandrake tool would constantly forget my settings and kppp seemed to be blocked by something else and would disconnect after checking username and password (these were entered correctly).

      I'll still continue to check out future mandrake releases but suse seems (to me) to be a more polished distro.

      Just my 2c. ;-)

  18. easy by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're supposed to bitch endlessly about how this is an advertisement.

    Discuss amongst yourselves.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:easy by squaretorus · · Score: 1

      Yeah - your right - this IS a fucking advertisement!!! If I wanted advertisements I'd read all about rackspace and Macromedia MX 2004 at the top of the page!!!!

      Is nothing sacred!!! Articles are for uninteresting old news with a slight geek interest factor - not adverts for useful services!!!

  19. Linus did not say that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you a retard. That saying was around long before Linus stole his first line of code from AT&T labs.

    Retard.

    This only goes to show that you really are 13 and live in your parents basement.

  20. Distro-D! by RatBastard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    RacerX, WohUnknownToSpeedWasActuallyHisOlderBrotherRexWhoR anAwayYearsAgo.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Distro-D! by TheLevelHeadedOne · · Score: 1


      Did you miss a pill this morning? Depending on where you're located, it might not be too late to take it.

      --

      Twin or more? ITA
      Apache/Spring/La
    2. Re:Distro-D! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably took his headache pills, but I sure hope he's not from Jordan, Minnesota...
      Fornicate and fornicate, sing a song about fornicate...

      Pete, king of all detectives.

  21. please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Put all the ISOs and the md5 in one freaking torrent!

    1. Re:please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that.

  22. Bittorrent fast? by bo0ork · · Score: 1

    I'm getting a measly 26kb/s off bittorrent. I thought it was supposed to be fast? I'm on a 10Mbit line, so it ain't my pipe that's slow. Will it speed up when more people start downloading?

    --
    Does everything include nothing?
    1. Re:Bittorrent fast? by DigiitalWiz · · Score: 1

      Until there are more users it's going to be somewhat slow, the more people the faster it goes, I'm getting 700kb/s

    2. Re:Bittorrent fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Will it speed up when more people start downloading?

      Yes. If people keeps their download open as long as possible. Bittorrent need the help of every people...

    3. Re:Bittorrent fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I am mistaken, but Bittorrent makes no claims to speed. Its purpose is to shift some of the traffic to a peer-to-peer network, so that servers won't croak under the strain of tons of people downloading huge files.

      26kb/s is alright for Bittorrent. The connection speed varies widely depending on how many people are also downloading that file. You will probably get faster connections as more people start downloading it.

      Its not meant to be fast, so much as efficient.

    4. Re:Bittorrent fast? by croddy · · Score: 1
      Will it speed up when more people start downloading?

      I dunno, what do you think? you think it will make water run uphill?

    5. Re:Bittorrent fast? by satterth · · Score: 1

      When more people have the parts that you don't have then it will get faster.

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    6. Re:Bittorrent fast? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Bittorrent is overrated, the very fact that your download rate is proportional to your upload rate makes it garbage for most home broadband connections. Plus I've noticed that my upload rate is almost always higher than download.

      I have 1500mbps down, but a mere 128 up at home, so its crap. Easier to find a fast mirror.

      It's faster on the T1 at work, but then I spend the whole time doing about 80k down, with the upload maxed at 150k.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    7. Re:Bittorrent fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try using a non-crap client and/or hopping on a torrent that hasn't just started seeding.

  23. Thats how you pay for "products" by HanzoSan · · Score: 3, Insightful



    Linux is open source, its not a "product" its code. You pay for the development of the code, you dont pay for a license to run the prooduct.

    You arent helping the open source movement or mandrake by buying from a store, they make more money when you pay them directly and you pay alot less money. Also its a more stable form of income for you to subscribe considering they open source they dont make money from license fees, so you have to support the developers.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Thats how you pay for "products" by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1

      Strange... the invoices say Mandrake on it, and it arrived from France... we pay list price, directly to Mandrake (no middle people), meaning they get it all. In fact, they get the money in advance, because we pre-order.

    2. Re:Thats how you pay for "products" by iantri · · Score: 1

      HanszoSan clearly says he is talking about buying from a store. This is a reasonable assumption since you did not specify you were buying from Mandrake directly.

    3. Re:Thats how you pay for "products" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You idiot. Where do you think the store gets the fucking copies from?

    4. Re:Thats how you pay for "products" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usualy they are put out by book publishers at least the ones I have seen in Cosco.

    5. Re:Thats how you pay for "products" by WoodstockJeff · · Score: 1
      How is it NOT helping the open-source movement when we buy products through retail outlets, even though we buy direct from Mandrake?

      Subscribing to Mandrake Club benefits ONLY Mandrake. Buying Mandrake at Best Buy or Borders or ??? may not bring as much revenue to Mandrake, but it makes them more willing to put other open-source products on their shelves.

      BEING on shelves in a retail store gives a heck of a lot more exposure to OS projects than SlashDot stories could ever hope to give, with the people we're trying to convince OS is a "good thing". How many MSOffice users even considered StarOffice when it was just something to download, as opposed to being available when you walk into Best Buy, complete with a printed manual?

      Don't disregard the retail channel just because Mandrake only gets half the money!

    6. Re:Thats how you pay for "products" by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      Right, but the Club Membership costs Mandrake basically nothing (the same cannot be said of the boxed CDs that you buy from MandrakeStore).

    7. Re:Thats how you pay for "products" by Arandir · · Score: 2, Funny

      but the Club Membership costs Mandrake basically nothing

      Sounds like price gouging to me...

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  24. A question.. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 4, Funny

    So what does this story have to do with Apple!?

    If you guys are gonna run a mac site you need to run Apple stories!

    (for the humor impaired, that was tongue in cheek)

    1. Re:A question.. by slux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mandrake is also available for Macs (LinuxPPC), isn't it? ;)

      You see, there's still an Apple connection! They probably should've mentioned in the story to avoid confusion though, but you know how the Slashdot editors are.

      Now just hold your breath to see if the next one is also a Mac story.

  25. Here's a bit more info.. by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

    From news.com.com

    Linkage

    Looks like they have ACPI support!

    1. Re:Here's a bit more info.. by xcomputer_man · · Score: 1

      From news.com.com

      Linkage

      Looks like they have ACPI support!


      Wow, you mean Mandrake 9.1 final is out already?? What next now, Red Hat 9? It's so hard to keep up with these releases, isn't it?
    2. Re:Here's a bit more info.. by driftingAimfully · · Score: 1

      Er, that link is for version 9.1 on March 27. I haven't found any news about RC1 (as opposed to beta2) so I guess we'll just have to wait for the official Mandrake site to catch up.

    3. Re:Here's a bit more info.. by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      Haha, you got me. I didn't even notice the release version, I just looked at the article date (today.) Ignore me and carry on.

    4. Re:Here's a bit more info.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha! Again, I didn't even look at the article month (march) just the day (27th). I suck. I'm not even going to attach my name to this.

  26. Buy Direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't say I like these leech-cd companies very much. Even when they donate to the projects, it's still at the cost of a direct lost sale that would have supported them a lot more.

    If you care enough about a project to want it on a professionally replicated CD, you should at least be willing to buy it from an official outlet.

    Signed,
    An Official Outlet

    1. Re:Buy Direct by drunk_as_in_beer · · Score: 1

      I can't say I like these leech-cd companies very much. Even when they donate to the projects, it's still at the cost of a direct lost sale that would have supported them a lot more. If you care enough about a project to want it on a professionally replicated CD, you should at least be willing to buy it from an official outlet.

      What if you don't particularly give a shit about a particular project, but you do want to try out their product before you decide whether you give a shit or not? And you're on a 56k connection?

      Is it any worse than us broadband users downloading the ISO's?

      --
      --Drunk as in Beer
    2. Re:Buy Direct by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Kinda defeats the point of Linux being free doesn't it.

      And I have downloaded ISO's over a 33.6 dialup connection. 600 megs takes a LONG time obviously, but if you don't want to pay anything, and you're the patient type, it'd do-able.

    3. Re:Buy Direct by WNight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a big difference between paying $2 for convenience and paying $49.95 for a boxed set of a distro I may just be vaugely interested in.

      I use Debian and Mandrake enough to warrant paying them something, the rest of the distros I try out, but it's just to see what they have to offer. If I buy a CD they get paid something, maybe $.25, and don't pay for the gig or two of bandwidth. If I download it they get paid nothing unless I really like it, and have to pay for my bandwidth.

      I think these cheap-CD places are a good thing, especially if they pitch in some money.

    4. Re:Buy Direct by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      This whole argument regarding selling cds is pointless when taken in context.

      THIS IS A RELEASE CANDIDATE. It's not the finished product and doesn't pretend to be. Mandrake isn't boxing up the RC1 and the final version won't be boxed for months. Bring these arguments back up when the full version hits the shelves.

    5. Re:Buy Direct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the "buy the boxed set", point, and I have done so more than once, but all the times I've downloaded various distros it's been off of mirror sites that for the most part were *.gov, *.edu, or ibiblio.org. So instead of me taking money out of the pockets of the distro companies it's being taken out of all of our pockets in taxes and tuition, and what have you. Those french... very tricky.

    6. Re:Buy Direct by millette · · Score: 1

      While there is some truth to that, I cannot agree completely. If someone would download the iso otherwise, but doesn't have the bandwidth, then of course it makes more sense to put 5$ on a CD then 30$ for the same thing... it's not like the official outlet lost a sale in this case.

      In conclusion, let the users decide :)

    7. Re:Buy Direct by Gherald · · Score: 1

      > It's not the finished product and doesn't pretend to be.

      Uh, actually, release candidates DO pretend to be a finished product. Its the betas that do not.

    8. Re:Buy Direct by AIM31 · · Score: 1

      Also Mandrake usually takes a while before the retail version comes out after the release happens, and they say on their website that most of their revenues are coming from MandrakeClub subscriptions anyway, with boxed versions not making them much money.

    9. Re:Buy Direct by rickst29 · · Score: 1
      Mandrake will NOT create a "boxed" retail CD of this Release Candidate. Furthermore, Mandrake strongly prefers to be supported by 'Mandrake Club' memberships (which give them a constant and dependable revenue stream, in contrast to many weeks/months of delay to receive revenue via retail channels for "boxed sets"). Retail Distribution yields only a low percentage of the sales price as revenue back to Mandrake as gross margin on the sale. Membership also helps Mandrake avoid the expenses which result when "boxed set" inventories go out-of-date.

      Mr. Duval has expressed that that the best way to support Mandrake is to become a Club member (I personally have done so). Mandrake is also asking for reasonably competent Linux users to test out the Beta and RC versions on non-production machines. If you have such a machine, please test the RC and support Mandrake now. If you want to wait until the Official Release, become a member now and then feel free to buy discount CDs if you only desire the Standard Edition: Don't wait for the 'official' sets to show up on store shelves weeks or months after the Release becomes official.

  27. I also am outraged! by Bistronaut · · Score: 4, Funny

    If the /. editors keep this up, Slashdot will loose its reputation for only reporting on important social issues and touching human-interest stories!

  28. Pay for what you use by nuggz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes if you want to support Mandrake give them money.

    But if you want to support the various apps and projects give them money directly.

    I think the work done on gnome, kde and X are more likey important to a typical user.
    If you want that to improve put your money there, not on the guys making a distribution.

    1. Re:Pay for what you use by slux · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mandrake develops many GUI administration tools under the DrakXtools. I personally haven't seen anything that matches them in any other distribution except SuSe, but Yast2 isn't free software like all the tools Mandrake has developed (they are under the GNU GPL).

      All their documentation is also under the GNU FDL.

      And lastly, distributions often contribute directly to projects so when you're paying to Mandrake, you're also paying the salaries of some developers working on the various major free software projects. I don't think Mandrake has any "big" names like Red Hat (Alan Cox) or Conectiva (Marcelo Tosati) for example but they do some important work just like all the other popular distributions.

    2. Re:Pay for what you use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is way much easier to make a consistant and good app, than it is to make a consistant and good distro.

      so...i know where my money goes.

    3. Re:Pay for what you use by bheerssen · · Score: 1


      I think the work done on gnome, kde and X are more likey important to a typical user.
      If you want that to improve put your money there, not on the guys making a distribution.


      Distribution vendors need money too you know. All those great administration tools that Mandrake developed cost them money. As did all of the integration work.

      Of course, if you insist that distribution vendors don't deserve support as much as the application developers, you are welcome to invest in only applications. But let's see you roll your own distribution from kernel up. I'll bet you change your views then.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    4. Re:Pay for what you use by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

      I think Mandrake are fully aware that the apps they package need funds too.

      When you join Mandrake club you can choose which apps you would like to direct money to. At least you could when I joined.

    5. Re:Pay for what you use by Renaud · · Score: 1

      Mandrake does have (or used to have) "big" names on their payroll, like David Faure of KDE fame, or kernel developer Jeff Garzik.

      Any place that enables free software developers to make a living out of their passion deserves support anyway.

  29. So by isorox · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So did budgetlinuxcds pay for the advert, or is Timothy as lame as the trolls say?

    1. Re:So by isorox · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think that BLCD's competitors paid for the ad :D

      I wonder how their revenue stream benefits from a slashdotting?

  30. Re:explane me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Open them in notepad and print them. They're fun to look at and if you stare long enough, you'll see things.

  31. Re:Down with France! by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But Red Hat sounds like it's a product of communism !

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  32. Not Linus by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Informative
    From what I've heard, the quote was originally from Andrew Tanenbaum's book "Computer Networks" and it went like this:

    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway."


    I guess the "hurtling down the highway" part is where you get the bandwidth. A station wagon full of tapes sitting in the driveway is just storage space.
    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:Not Linus by Abm0raz · · Score: 1

      You may very well be right. I've always heard it attributed to Linus, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's CORRECTLY attributed to him. If I'm wrong then I'm wrong.

      -Ab

      --
      Nothing fails quite like prayer.
    2. Re:Not Linus by RdsArts · · Score: 1

      A station wagon full of tapes sitting in the driveway is just storage space.

      Ya, station wagons are usually a hard drive. 'Cept maybe if you have power steering.

    3. Re:Not Linus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does one measure that? GB per meter per second?

    4. Re:Not Linus by catenos · · Score: 1

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway.

      Yeah, but the latency sucks. ;)

      --
      Keep an eye on which arguments are silently dropped in replies. Not always, but often times it's very telling.
  33. Re:Why? by Kircle · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't follow this distro (Im a RedHat user) but I would like to know what warrants a RC release story on the front of Slashdot.

    I don't follow your posts, but I would like to know what warrants a comment like yours on a story you don't even think should be on the front page of Slashdot.

    Seriously, some people simply just want to know when a new Mandrake comes out (even if it is a pre-final release). If you don't care for the story, just ignore it. I wouldn't say your comment was un-insightful. Just maybe a tad unnecessary.

    --

    -- Kircle

  34. Re:here comes the torre%BVNO CARRIER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you check stats like this with BitTorrent?

  35. Re:as Linus said ...(karma whore) by gosand · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with back-up tapes." -Linus

    Mod parent down.

    What karma whoring. I have never heard this quote attributed to Linus. The source of it is somewhat sketchy, but it surely wasn't Linus.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  36. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put all the ISOs and the md5 in one freaking torrent!

  37. Re:Down with France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I value democracy but I also happen to speak French. Therefore, my distro of choice is one which is fully translated in my own language, unlike Red Hat which is quite bastardized when installed in french.

    So, please stop bashing others because they don't think the way you do...

    Democracy should not be imposed upon anybody.

  38. timothy is the new michael! by scosol · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    subject says it all

    --
    I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
  39. Re:If you'd bothered looking on Mandrake's website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been out for ages.

    Index of /torrent

    Icon Name Last modified Size Description[DIR] Parent Directory

    [] 9.2rc1.md5sums.asc.torrent 27-aou-2003 16:40 157
    [] MandrakeLinux-9.2rc1-CD1.i586.iso.torrent 27-aou-2003 16:29 51K
    [] MandrakeLinux-9.2rc1-CD2.i586.iso.torrent 27-aou-2003 16:34 51K
    [] MandrakeLinux-9.2rc1-CD3.i586.iso.torrent 27-aou-2003 16:36 51K

    Take a good look at the dates.

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use less whitespace.
    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use less whitespace.
    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use less whitespace.
    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use less whitespace.
    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Please use less whitespace.

  40. Linux Mandrake by Solosoft · · Score: 2, Informative

    The last time I tried linux mandrake was the 8.0 series back when I just got linux. I guess I can't really be off topic since there is _no_ topic.
    The one thing I did like about mandrake is the usablity. I found it easy and "fun" if you would call it to use. Now I ran it on a 166MMX with 128mb of RAM. Memory wise mandrake wasn't too bad, but CPU wise the system would just sit there almost "frozen" at 100% CPU forever. Then when I installed 9.0 it was so bad I gave up and tried Debian. When I did this I was lost as a motherfuck since Mandrake babyed me so much. I actually had to edit confs and shit ... It took me a little over 3 days and I got my system back to normal operation.
    oh , I guess there was no topic and I thought I would put my 2cents in about drake :)

    1. Re:Linux Mandrake by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      Odd.. I found 9.0 to be pretty good. 8.0 was an absolute disaster, even falling back to hand editing stuff like when I was on RH 5.2 and Mandrake 6.0 I couldn't get X or KDE to even remotely work properly. Had to backtrack to 7.2. 8.1 and on have worked beautifully however. I even paid the 70 bucks+whatever insane international shipping they charged to order it.

      I like Mandrake because it has GUIs that actually come together cleanly and sensibly, but if a gui is getting in the way, you have configuration files that can be understood by a normal human you can edit, rather than blindly charging into the registry. I've become a huge fan of URPMI as well. Need to update something? 'urpmi packagename"... boom its installed. You get good gui configuration(better than windows) with the option of configuring things via console tools(which is effectively a nonexistent option for windows).

      Granted, there is a serious bloat problem in the default installs(I mean, 6 GUI web browsers by default? hello excessive!) but other than that, I love it. If RPM were extended with an ability to place a button for the executeable on your K or Foot menu, the one serious Mandrake usability deficiency over windows would be gone.

      They are getting my money again when 9.2 is at final release status.

    2. Re:Linux Mandrake by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      I found RPM's to be a disaster if you didn't use the distro ones. I find apt-get alot better then urpmi and alot easier to use. Since sometimes urpmi liked to break and fuckup if you used the wrong RPM

  41. Re:My tongue is firmly in cheek . . . by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    So why don't you give an example of funny, so we can all bask in your inspirational genius... Take you time.. I'm sure you can think of something that will have everyone rolling.

  42. Re:Why? by ninjaz · · Score: 1
    I would like to know what warrants a RC release story on the front of Slashdot.

    I'd say the rationale of announcing a first RC is along the lines of letting people who use Mandrake know they should start going out to test it, because the next release is almost ready.

    The more -RC testers, the more system configurations it gets tested on, the more bugs reported (and hopefully fixed!) prior to release. I think Slashdot is doing its job nicely by reporting this.

    Usinng Mandrake myself, I'll be happy just to get incremental upgrades on all the distro-bundled software I use (galeon, mozilla, OpenOffice, etc), regardless of whiz-bang new things.

  43. Re:here comes the torre%BVNO CARRIER by error502 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ability to do that is all built-in to the BitTorrent protocol. You just need a client which doesn't suck.

    On Windows, I use this. I'm sure you can find equivalent clients for other operating systems with a quick Google search.

  44. Strange that this isn't on Mandrake's home page... by rokzy · · Score: 1

    suspicious.

    plus I just downloaded beta2 and am about to burn the iso's. ffs.

  45. It is... by siskbc · · Score: 4, Informative
    Not everybody is on broadband and not all advertising is evil.

    ...when it's masquerading as journalism.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:It is... by Andrewkov · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You must be new to Slashdot... Other neat Slashdotisms you'll soon be familiar with: Duplicate stories, spelling and grammar errors posted by the "editors", and posting of articles that the editors clearly hasn't even read. Still, it's all in good fun.

      +1 Troll...

    2. Re:It is... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Since when is /. journalism?!:)

    3. Re:It is... by siskbc · · Score: 1
      You must be new to Slashdot... Other neat Slashdotisms you'll soon be familiar with: Duplicate stories, spelling and grammar errors posted by the "editors", and posting of articles that the editors clearly hasn't even read. Still, it's all in good fun.

      You forgot my all-time favorite, the "You must be new to slashdot" joke. Yeah, I'm talkin' to you.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    4. Re:It is... by WNight · · Score: 1

      Not at all. If Intel releases a new chip and someone prints their press release, that's news. The news is that there's a new product, features - according to the manufacturer as follows, that I should be informed of. Or, if you wish to see it this way, it's news that Intel thinks it's got a newsworthy product.

      This Slashdot article said "Mandrake is 9.2rc1 is out! If you wish to get it without downloading, we're happy to provide that service." Both parts of that are news. That mandrake 9.2rc1 is out is news, and that there's a company that'll burn a CD and fedex it to you is also news. I am interested, at least in general, by both items.

      What is not news, for instance, would be an unfair representation of the truth for advertisement purposes. If SCO releases a "Linux is ours" press release, the release itself isn't news, though it is valid news that SCO released a document claiming to be news.

      Do you see what I mean?

    5. Re:It is... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      You haven't been reading Slashdot for long enough, have you.

      Comparing Slashdot to journalism is like comparing a McDonald's cheeseburger to Prime Rib.

  46. Re:here comes the torre%BVNO CARRIER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It means that, among the people downloading that file, they have only 40% of the full file. Since nobody has a complete copy, the torrent dies.

  47. Re:Why? by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    Many in the Mandrake community help by sending in bug reports during the RC process. It's important that we know when this process begins.

    I for one appreciate this story.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  48. Re:Why? by Azureflare · · Score: 1
    All I know is, I just downloaded Beta 2, and burned the cds...and then they come out with RC1. Sheesh. I didn't even have time to install it! They release very fast. It's cool though, I'd rather have fast releases than vapor-releases.

    Also, Mandrake is probably the easiest for Linux Newbs, so it's always good to see new developments. I don't know if it warrants slashdot frontpage, but hey, it's a slow news day =)

  49. The most interesting feature of this release is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That the console (ctrl+alt+f1) now has a picture of tux in the background.

  50. Re:And for the next 50 posts by elrond2003 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I agree, cannot get Mandrake to function properly. Won't support mozilla or Java. Runs blazingly slow, did they ship it with a built in virus?

  51. YOU ARE WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    retard!

    1. Re:YOU ARE WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jerk!

  52. maybe they paid slashdot to post the story? by joeldg · · Score: 3, Funny

    with the blatant advert in that post I am wondering if they paid for the post?

    Hrm.. that might be a new marketing angle from slashdot..

    News for nerds, stuff that people paid 'us' for 'you' to look at.

    1. Re:maybe they paid slashdot to post the story? by isorox · · Score: 1

      1) Pay slashdot for ad
      2) Get slashdotted
      3) ...
      4) Profit!

      It's more likely that another linux CD distributer paid slashdot, MAking slashdot a mercenary for hire.

  53. obWhore by dspeyer · · Score: 1
    Mandrake Linux 9.2 Beta information page. Beta 2

    We would like to thank all those who are already contributing to the beta testing process and we invite everyone to participate in 9.2's development. To make sure testing the next Mandrake is a pleasing experience, Beta 2 include new versions of software.

    Corrections from beta1 include:

    • Rpmdrake now functional
    • Upgrade from former versions now fully handled
    • New windows are now conveniently centered
    Urpmi and rpmdrake still complain about missing key. This issue should be fixed in the next beta.

    Improvements:

    • First version of Netprofile, the new network profiles manager designed for users who connect to multiple networks. Feedback is highly requested for this newly introduced feature.
    • Complete rewrite of userdrake (user management) in Gtk2
    • New bootsplash (graphical boot) with graphical design not completed
    • Improved localization
    • New font support for Indian
    • Enhanced drakTermServ (terminal server configurator).

    New software versions:

    • KDE 3.1.3
    • GNOME 2.3.5
    • Evolution 1.4.4
    • Openldap 2.1.22
    • kerberos5 1.3

    In short, they don't say much about it. Maybe somebody's already bittorrented it and will give us a +5 informative review? Or hasn't and will give us a +5 funny guess?

    1. Re:obWhore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New bootsplash (graphical boot) with graphical design not completed

      Anyone ever wonder how much further distro's would have advanced linux development if every new release hadn't had time wasted on developing a new graphical bootloader?

    2. Re:obWhore by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Not a 9.2 review, but a recent experience with Mandrake...

      I installed 9.1 over the weekend. Yesterday a big storm hit and the machine shut down without a hint of grace once my UPS ran out.

      I booted it up, and my ext3 partition was missing all sorts of files. This surprised the hell out of me, because I've never seen a filesystem actually lose files it wasn't currently altering during a power failure.

      Maybe Mandrake 9.2 will come with "NOW, %50 FASTER FILE LOSS" feature ;)

      Yes, I know it's not Mandrake's fault that ext3 fucked me over. As for me, I got to practice reinstalling, and am giving ReiserFS a shot. Fuck ext3, even FAT is more forgiving, and hopefully I will be able to say the same for ReiserFS.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    3. Re:obWhore by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      I usually like XFS, but its not really a good idea without a UPS and unattended shutdown (why wouldn't you have that if you are on a UPS? try apcupsd), but I think the same comment goes for ReiserFS. You were probably only doing metadata journalling.

      If you aren't using that UPS time to shut down the machine cleanly, a journalling filesystem that only journals metadata isn't going to do you a hell of a lot of good.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    4. Re:obWhore by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'll give apcupsd a look, I was planning on hooking up their USB control cable, but hadn't gotten around to it.

      But you still havn't answered my other question:

      Why would ANY filesystem, provided it's not currently being altered, lose files JUST BECAUSE you did a non-graceful shutdown? In concept, you should only lose uncompleted cached writes and writes in progress, correct?

      Can you explain it with anything other than "must be a bug"?

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    5. Re:obWhore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ext3 is truly pretty corruption-prone given the defaults when set up. it can be made better and more robust in /etc/fstab, although it is then slower. still, well worth it. read google news postings or the man page about ext3.

    6. Re:obWhore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would ANY filesystem, provided it's not currently being altered, lose files JUST BECAUSE you did a non-graceful shutdown? In concept, you should only lose uncompleted cached writes and writes in progress, correct?

      Strange. I've never lost any files using ext3 and pulling the plug. (Done several times using Mdk9.1)

    7. Re:obWhore by John+Hansen · · Score: 1
      I booted it [Mandrake 9.1] up, and my ext3 partition was missing all sorts of files. This surprised the hell out of me, because I've never seen a filesystem actually lose files it wasn't currently altering during a power failure.

      When Mandrake runs the startup check, it first fixes the journal. Then, when you see ***REBOOT LINUX*** you are supposed to do exactly that.

      Exactly that.

      I've been using Mandrake 9.1 here in California, which probably suffers more brownouts and blackouts than any other state. As long as I reboot when it tells me to, I don't lose anything...

    8. Re:obWhore by EvilAlien · · Score: 1
      Ah, yes I supposed I missed your point. Perhaps the file got corrupted and consigned to lost and found. I don't really know, but I'm sure further research (i.e,. google) will provide an answer. I'm assuming that the files you lost in the shutdown were being altered at that time. I can't think of a reason for them to spontaneously disappear otherwise.

      As for apcupsd, it works very well. I have a Back-UPS ES 500VA hooked up to a Linux server via the USB cable, and it works very well. I've tested it and watched it compensate for real world outages, as well as observe it doing regular tests. For your ease of reference: Apcupsd's Support for USB UPSes.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    9. Re:obWhore by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      I've been using Mandrake 9.1 here in California, which probably suffers more brownouts and blackouts than any other state. As long as I reboot when it tells me to, I don't lose anything...

      Maybe in the news, but then you haven't lived in rural america, especially nevada. A few flashes of lightning in the sky, and cities come to their knees.

      California gets the press, but living in So California, I have seen only two power outages in many years. (And a few brownouts) Our companies in Nevada see them almost weekly.

      Just an FYI LOL...

  54. Please don't get testy (snicker) by toupsie · · Score: 1
    Many in the Mandrake community help by sending in bug reports during the RC process. It's important that we know when this process begins. I for one appreciate this story. If you are in the "Mandrake community" why would you need Slashdot to inform you of the release. I assume you would follow their website, forums, mailing lists, etc.

    I wasn't "dissin'" Mandrake, I was curious why an RC was a good story for the homepage of Slashdot. I was hoping that it was something really cool they failed to mention in the story brief. From reading the changelog posted, I guess there really wasn't anything to mention. Just another distro upgrade to inflate the version number, not that there is anything wrong with that -- RedHat does that every 3 to 6 months.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Please don't get testy (snicker) by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

      "If you are in the "Mandrake community" why would you need Slashdot to inform you of the release. I assume you would follow their website, forums, mailing lists, etc."

      I, like most people, split my time among many projects etc. I don't live and breath Mandrake but I use it. I am still part of the community and participate in the RC process.

      This /. article was the first that I knew of the start of the RC process and I am therefore glad that they ran it.

      "I wasn't "dissin'" Mandrake, I was curious why an RC was a good story for the homepage of Slashdot."

      As my first post stated...

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  55. Tired of hearing this nice and simple line... by msimm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't get these types of posts. First its as if there's a presumption that Linux should be hard to use in order to be taken seriously. Then there seems to be the insinuation that because its easy(er) to use its somehow lost the 'power' of other less user friendly distributions.

    I'd be curious to hear what exactly are the lacking features? I've been using Linux since 1998 and tried quite a few distro's before deciding on Mandrake (Redhat, Debian, Caldera *long before SCO*, FreeBSD, Gentoo, etc). They all function basically the same. My desktop has always been Blackbox, bash is set and gcc is standard.

    If your don't like Mandrakes configuration tools you've got all the standard tools: XFree86configuration, Netconf, Vi. I'm not sure of a single package that you can get on another distro that you can't on Mandrake and you can certainly compile anything else you'd like.

    To me Mandrake is simple a better thought out distribution, but with all the flexibility of a Linux distribution it can be as full featured or as limited as you'd like.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Tired of hearing this nice and simple line... by Zoolander · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've used Mandrake a few years before I switched to Gentoo, and I liked it in many ways. What i didn't like was the way they moved things around and put in 'mdk' directories, so you didn't know where to find things.

      If you're like me and like to edit the conf files by hand, so you see how they're made and what options you have, this quickly becomes a nuisance.

      Also, I felt that because they moved stuff around, many HOWTO:s became much harder to follow (at least when I was a relative noob, which is where you usually use HOWTO:s the most).

      Sure, all distros have their specific way of setting things up, but I felt that they just went too far in their obsession to put the 'mdk' mark everywhere.

      But hey, I haven't used Mandrake since 8.1, so what do I know? Maybe they've changed that!

      --
      Meep.
    2. Re:Tired of hearing this nice and simple line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      netconf? Since when is netconf a standard tool?

  56. Re:Down with France! by lp_bugman · · Score: 0, Troll

    They are going to stay for about 20 years at least. Oil reserves a key factor controling world economy.
    Only FYI.

    --
    BSD licensed software can't be stolen....
  57. Re:suX0rs by lp_bugman · · Score: 1

    Back in '93 or '95 I just to use Slackware for every thing but then I realized how difficult is to realy UPGRADE a Slackware system (I think grat advances have been made in this respect with new aditions to the pkg system). And they I fell in love with sys V init scripts. That now I don't seem to like anything with out it.

    Slackware it's a creat for hackers and stuff but if that's the case why not just use gentoo ?

    Debian and RedHat are very good for production servers and is fairly easy to uptade them and keep them current.

    --
    BSD licensed software can't be stolen....
  58. No, it make sense by nettarzan · · Score: 1

    like the idea that posting to Slashdot could actually speed up a download. It seems so wrong.

    Actually, it speeds up the download counter in the hosting site.

  59. Re:If you'd bothered looking on Mandrake's website by fbw · · Score: 1

    Just about now?

    With a bit of luck, you would be in the nick of time to watch the last few megabytes of your download slow down, stall, and then eventually get a timeout due to a slashdotting.

  60. dues by chrismg2003 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't forget to pay your Dues to SCO! ;)

    --

    Red Hat is for people who hate Windows, FreeBSD is for people who love Unix.

    www.putertech.net

  61. Your conscience is getting to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thief!

  62. Why not? I'm just doing what the RIAA does. by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Troll

    Please don't use the term "steal Linux," as it implies that anyone who potentially downloads it is a thief.

    Yeah but the RIAA says anyone who downloads an mp3 is a thief, I was making a point.

    t is very insulting and moreover an incorrect term to use in this context.

    Yes I know it is insulting, thats why I picked that word because it seems like people equate downloading with stealing moreso than freeloading or sharing.

    Even then, the company knew what it was getting into when it decided to try and sell a product that could be given away freely, so a "freeloader" in the traditional sense it not necessarily abusing the system.

    They arent selling a product they are selling services. Mandrake is a services company, you pay for the code not the product.

    That said, I've purchased two Mandrake retail products (@ USD70 each) in the last couple years. I'm not very social and clubs are too touchy-feely for me.


    yeah thanks for supporting walmart, Mandrake prolly only gets half the money they could get if you joined the club.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Why not? I'm just doing what the RIAA does. by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      And you wish to follow the examples set by the RIAA ...

    2. Re:Why not? I'm just doing what the RIAA does. by HanzoSan · · Score: 0, Troll



      The RIAA knows alot about communicating with the masses. Alot of people seem to think filesharing is stealing now because the RIAA is a master at propaganda. I simply used their techniques to get my point accross hoping that the same fools who fall for the RIAA propaganda will fall for the Linux Mandrake propaganda.

      Please stop robbing the developers and stealing Linux.

      --
      If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    3. Re:Why not? I'm just doing what the RIAA does. by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      The RIAA is poised to die a horrible and wretched death under the weight of their own arm twisting and lies. *sarcasm*By God, I hope Mandrake follows THAT path!*/sarcasm*

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    4. Re:Why not? I'm just doing what the RIAA does. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Problem is, the fools who swallow the RIAA crap will likely stick to Windows.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  63. is mandrake still viable by b17bmbr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i have used drake since 7.0. i have bought 7.0, 7.2, 8.0, and 9.0 so feel that leeching an iso or two is not horrible. however, are they still viable? i love it. i can just use it like a mind numbed idiot, or use it like a geek, and not have to worry. and urpmi is awesome. but with RH snarfing up most of the server biz, and suse seeming to get most of the rest of the press, is drake commercially viable. deb, gentoo, slack will always be around. but their not "commercial" distros. drake does such great jobs with their wizards and hardware, but is investing time and effort into drake pissing into the wind. i hope not, since i've used drke for years. but...

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:is mandrake still viable by shibashaba · · Score: 1

      I saw a piece done by one of Mandrakes contributors earlier this year on distrowatch who was already talking about forking mandrake into a non commercial distro. A year or two ago I remember Mandrake was also considering setting up a foundation to support it non-commercially. So basically if the company goes under there is already a big interest in it being maintained as a noncommericial distro.

      --
      ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
    2. Re:is mandrake still viable by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Well, 9.1 was good. I had a few bad experiences between the 7.x series and 9.1, but no problems with 9.1. I think they've got QA under controll again.

      It was probably the fiscal problem that their "aggressive management" got them into that caused the technical problems, and the signs are that they're on their way back up.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    3. Re:is mandrake still viable by truthsearch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a Mandrake Club member to help support the cause. Even if Mandrake goes under I don't think it's a waste. Their apps (AFAIK all of them) are open source. Anyone can keep the core distro going. It's the commercial apps that might have to be dropped because they're kept in the distro by Mandrake's purchases of licenses. But all the good stuff is open. So paying their developers pays for things the community can support later.

    4. Re:is mandrake still viable by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      9.1 was awesome. i ran it in my classroom last year. had several xterms connected, even my laptop. did everything with it. pounded the hell out of it, and it was up for 155 days.(end of school you know) but can they recover? did they lose market and mind share?

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    5. Re:is mandrake still viable by krammit · · Score: 1

      Actually, Slack is a commercial distro (the first IIRC). They just happen to have a very faithful following and probably much lower operating costs.

      --
      "Watch your cornhole, bud."
  64. Re:Down with France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't the French Revolutionaries wear red hats?

  65. If I try it, will I like it? by ewanrg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Tried the distribution some time ago. Seeing that a new one is out, I'm tempted to give it a run. But will it work in my situation:

    Could someone review the following and tell me which pieces are going to be problematic (or impossible):
    Computer: Compaq Presario 1720US Laptop (PIII 1 GhZ, 384 Meg RAM, 60 Gig HD, ATI Radeon Mobility Video, Built-in DVD/CD-RW)
    Attached Ethernet (Wired) to a Windows machine without monitor (need some way to run that in a virtual console)
    Attached Linksys Wireless Card (11b) in PC Card slot which is the only Internet connection
    Attached Firewire HD (LaCie 360 Gig)
    Attached Firewire DVD Burner (4xDVD-R)
    Attached TV via S-Video TV/Out
    Shared Printer/Scanner - Lexmark X75 PrinTrio

    So, is this going to be a worthwhile investment of my time, or is some/most of the above going to stop working? While I'd like to get off my MS Habit, I have this need to use most of the above that keeps pulling me back :-)

    1. Re:If I try it, will I like it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the distribution that determines if that stuff is going to work, it's the kernel (i.e. it's "Linux" that will). There shouldn't be anything in there that doesn't work for you if you make the switch to Linux. The only thing I might be concerned about is the printer / scanner only because that stuff can be a bitch to get working in any distro....

    2. Re:If I try it, will I like it? by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Informative

      have you tried any of the live cd distros(most notably knoppix)?

      knoppix can work quite well as a 'will linux work on it it' test(though, i could guess there would be situations where it fails while it is still possible to get linux running on it easily, and some features might need some tinkering like tv-out..) but it's so easy to test it doesn't matter all that much, just burn and boot.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:If I try it, will I like it? by ewanrg · · Score: 1

      Understand that the kernel has a lot to do with it. But different distributions also have different programs that come with them and different default configurations. In my case I'd like to know if this latest version of Mandrake is going to install with minimal fuss and still let me do what I do in XP now? If there are things that won't work out of the box, getting a heads up from the folks here would also be helpful. Hence the post :-)

    4. Re:If I try it, will I like it? by PostConsumerRecycled · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm currently running Mdk 9.1 on a Compaq Presario 906US (Athlon 1500+, ATI Radeon Mobility, Built-in DVD/CD-RW). Waired ethernet, no problem, Linksys Wireless (11g) is sort of working (I'm still working on the config) using linux-wlan.

      I can speak as to the firewire support, but my TV out worked for DVD, and I'm using an HP printer attached to a Windows 2000 machine using Samba and CUPS drivers.

      Also I couldn't get any other distro to install on my laptop, it had to do with the 2.4.21 Kernel Mandrake's using (other distro's still on 2.4.20). This is fine by me I've been using Mandrake since 5.X (don't remember exactly, I just threw out some old install disks, that took me back, what was that '97 '98? Linux has come a long way in the few years)

      Anyway hope that helps.

      --

      There is no dark side of the moon really, matter of fact it's all dark
    5. Re:If I try it, will I like it? by catenos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, is this going to be a worthwhile investment of my time, or is some/most of the above going to stop working? While I'd like to get off my MS Habit, I have this need to use most of the above that keeps pulling me back :-)

      If you "just" want to give it a try, please, PLEASE, don't install the RC, but wait until the final release is made. Even better, wait some weeks (2-3) after final release for the most important glitches to be known and read the errata before you are going to install.

      The RCs aren't for "newcomers" to try out. They for are testing and bug fixing by people willing investing the time to do so.

      But if you want to get the best chance that the final will support as much as possible on your notebook and you are willing to invest some time, then by all means, install it, test everything that matters to you and report any bugs you find (but be sure to look beforehand if the bug is already known).

      So, whether the investment of your time is worthwhile depends on your view. If you are not willing, are not interested or simply don't have the time for testing/bug reporting, the RC isn't for you. Well, it wasn't ever meant for you.

      Else, now is the time to get involved before it is too late (for getting any updates in before the freeze gets to freezy - they are already in version freeze).

      --
      Keep an eye on which arguments are silently dropped in replies. Not always, but often times it's very telling.
  66. SCO, hurry up and do something! by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Ooh.. Mandrake advertisments... How interesting. SCO needs to come up big for todays edition to be worth reading at all.
    Perhaps something like
    "oops, we just discovered SCO UNIX code in the GPL. All programs using it must now pay us $699 per computer using it. Act now, and get 33% off!"
    --
    SAILING MISHAP
  67. Re:Why? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

    I would like to know what warrants a RC release story on the front of Slashdot.

    There is no SCO news today, and Slashdot is trying to provoke some crazy press release about Linux RCs from the Stolen Code Organization.

  68. PPC release? (was: Re:A question..) by gsfprez · · Score: 1

    well, i was gonna start it, but i'll follow this comedy with a serious question.

    there have now been (at least) 2 non-releases of Mandrake 9.2 for x68. I can't seem to locate the PPC ISOs. There are only two possibilities.. they are unable to respond, they are unwilling to respond.. sorry.. damnit.

    1. there are none because they are not doing these pre-release releases for PPC
    2. I'm a total choad and i'm just missing it.

    I loved Mandrake on my POS AMD k2-500.. but my brother in law needed a machine, so i gave it to him... so now, my only "not doing anything" computer is an iBook a friend of mine gave me to give someone that refuses to call me back.. so screw him, i wanna install Mandrake on it.

    which leads me to the point of this..

    am i missing something, or are there no Mandrake 9.2x ISO releases? If there are, can you post where they are/how to get them?

    Thanks.

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  69. No, it's an ad. by siskbc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Not at all. If Intel releases a new chip and someone prints their press release, that's news.

    Journalists tend not to blindly run press releases. Even then, they're clearly tagged. This one wasn't.

    Or, if you wish to see it this way, it's news that Intel thinks it's got a newsworthy product.

    By that incredibly low standard, there's no commercial that's *not* news. So it defeats the purpose of having a disctinction. I'm not buying it.

    That mandrake 9.2rc1 is out is news, and that there's a company that'll burn a CD and fedex it to you is also news.

    If this company were new,I'd agree. It's not. Therefore, it's not news. It's an advertisement attached to a story.

    The same thing happened about 5 years ago to the LA Times. They ran a story about the staples center, new home of the Lakers, near a story about the lakers. The Staples story was bought. It wasn't labeled as such. The LA Times was lambasted by the major journalism associations. They later apologized.

    Naturally, this begs the question: was the mandrake thing just a friendly plug, or can those be bought too?

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:No, it's an ad. by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      Journalists tend not to blindly run press releases. Even then, they're clearly tagged. This one wasn't.

      Apart from the largest circulation sources (ie the NY Times, WSJ, et al), you'd be amazed how many times a press release gets printed with only cursory editing (generally just for length). In the magazine world, it's standard operating procedure to go from press releases.

      The same thing happened about 5 years ago to the LA Times. They ran a story about the staples center, new home of the Lakers, near a story about the lakers. The Staples story was bought. It wasn't labeled as such. The LA Times was lambasted by the major journalism associations. They later apologized.

      There's a difference between running a press release and running a paid-for story.

      Naturally, this begs the question

      Actually, it doesn't. Know what the fuck you're talking about before you post.

      was the mandrake thing just a friendly plug, or can those be bought too?

      Short answer: yes. IIRC, when the subscription bits were announced yesterday, included with the announcement was that Slashdot would be willing to sell stories (ie pay VA and get the story of your choice posted, provided it met minimal editorial standards).

    2. Re:No, it's an ad. by siskbc · · Score: 1
      Actually, it doesn't. Know what the fuck you're talking about before you post.

      Then I'd refrain if I were you. Slashdot needs fewer assholes. Seriously, where do you think you get off?

      Short answer: yes. IIRC, when the subscription bits were announced yesterday, included with the announcement was that Slashdot would be willing to sell stories

      And that's not an ad...how?

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:No, it's an ad. by leviramsey · · Score: 1

      You have no idea what I posted my next-to-last paragraph about, do you?

      Hint: google for "beg the question" and you shall be enlightened. Just because you think a phrase means something doesn't mean that it means that.

      Try refraining from posting until you have a modicum of understanding of what you're saying.

      Idiot.

    4. Re:No, it's an ad. by siskbc · · Score: 1
      enlightened. Just because you think a phrase means something doesn't mean that it means that.

      Oh, I get it. You're being one of those little anal-retentive shits that abound on slashdot. Then replace the offending phrase with something that gets your panties unbunched.

      Try refraining from posting until you have a modicum of understanding of what you're saying.

      What the fuck is your problem? Is it ragtime over there? This is a message board, that's what it's for. It's not a fucking doctoral dissertation. It's a discussion.

      Idiot.

      Talk to me again when you get out of high school.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    5. Re:No, it's an ad. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Where do you think you are? Kuro5hin? ;-P

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  70. Re:Down with France! by magadass · · Score: 0

    You are thinking of the Red Coat's, I believe the hats were actually black if I am not mistakin :P

    --
    "If I was smarter I could rule the world!"
  71. Good News by pastpolls · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a casual linux user I like Mandrake. It supports everything on my laptop (including my Sony R505 - IEEE1394 DVD-ROM drive) right out of the box. It is great for anyone who is thinking of moving to Linux but does not know where to start (or have time dealing with compatibility issues that can pop-up). We all know it is bloated, but I don't have the time to work some of the other compatibility challenged distros.

    For now I cannot go to linux all the way because of what I do for a living (anyone want to talk to Avid about porting XpressDV to linux), but I love it for all of my "office work" and emailing. I will give RC2 a try, and I support Mandrake as a company. To me they are they closest to "Linux on the Desktop". They support the latest packages and builds along with good hardware support. Last Friday I had over 300 SoBig.F viruses in my inbox before I got a chance to filter it out with my host's email server configurator (hosting service thing). I did not fear downloading them at all. I pop-ed them, then trashed them, while my co-worked was freaking out trying not to get infected... can't beat that with a stick, thanks Linux... Mandrake made this possible for me.

  72. Re:here comes the torre%BVNO CARRIER by athakur999 · · Score: 1

    I've been using Azureus myself. It can handle .torrents at the same time and spread your upload bandwidth among them (rather than having multiple clients open, each one having it's own upload throttle).

    It's got some neat eye candy if you're bored. :)

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  73. OpenOffice 1.1 RC 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OpenOffice.org 1.1 is at RC 3. Why did I never see a story talking about that? Anyways, as soon as Gnumeric is available on Windows, I think I might switch to using AbiWord/Gnumeric instead. Your thoughts?

  74. ISO install == waste of CD+time by Merlin_80000 · · Score: 5, Informative

    personally, I almost never burn a CD anymore for linux installers.....too much hassle. its much easier to me to create the network install floppy and pick a mirror(now a torrent-based install floppy would be uber-cool) the most complicated thing about this is writing down the server host name and the URL that contains the RPMs. once that's done, you begin the normal install process and you're only downloading exactly what you need in order to get a proper installation. creating the floppy is easy, just download the images/network.img (pcmcia.img for laptops) and use dd (winrawrite for windows) to create the boot floppy this is a very old practice, I know. but I'm mostly writing for those who don't. so conserve plastic/aluminum, bandwidth, and time and use the network install instead

    --
    Please keep in my that my ADHD keeps me a little scatter brained and I sometimes can't focus long enough to
  75. Join the European antipatent protest online or Die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Support the Protest Against Patents...

    It's ironic that /. would run a story about linux today at all. But what really surprises me is that Slashdot would continue operation today, even though they allegedly support the Online Demonstration Against Software Patents [ffii.org].
    [linuxfr.org]

    I would urge the /. staff to immediately shut down operations and support the
    demonstration, unless they really don't care about open-source software at all.

  76. Supporting Mandrake by Artifakt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mandrake added native support for dual monitors in their 9.0 series distro. (9.1 if memory serves). Even if you don't use Mandrake Linux, that's a selling point to encourage that 5% of MS Windows home users that have multiple monitors to try Linux. Since these are some of the most techno-literate of MS users, a higher than avarage percent will probably listen - this is a place where Linux can win market share.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
    1. Re:Supporting Mandrake by base3 · · Score: 1

      I installed 9.1, and still had to grab drivers for my G400 from Matrox to get dual head--did I perhaps do something wrong? TIA.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    2. Re:Supporting Mandrake by Arandir · · Score: 1

      Correction, Mandrake ships with XFree86, which is what supports dual monitors. Other systems also shipping with XFree86 supporting dual monitors include among others Redhat, SuSE, Gentoo, FreeBSD, etc, etc, etc.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    3. Re:Supporting Mandrake by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      9.0 did that... installed it when I was using a pair of TNT2's and the installer set it all up for me.

      I don't know if it will properly set up a single card that has dual outputs though. But it probably will. Hmm. Maybe I should set up 10GB or so on this box as a linux install.

    4. Re:Supporting Mandrake by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

      Yeah except that, apparently, Mandrake sets it up automagically; Gentoo really does'nt in any case.

  77. Well this is easy... by DoctorPepper · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Let's see...

    apt-get update && apt-get upgrade...

    Damn! wrong distro!

    --

    No matter where you go... there you are.
    1. Re:Well this is easy... by ErixTr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try;
      urpmi.update -a
      urpmi --auto-select

      --
      less is more
  78. Re:Down with France! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's right, French Revolutionaries had 'red hat' in the revolution of 1789. I don't know if french revolutionaries had black coat in the other revolution (1830, 1848 and 1871) but i don't think.

  79. Re:People are funnay!!! by bheerssen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    dood, ah yoosed ta spel gewd to, butt awl dem dam koledge calsses dun fuct wit ma haed. Ore wuzit da durgs? Ah jes fergit ennymo.

    --
    (Score: -1, Stupid)
  80. Re:Strange that this isn't on Mandrake's home page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The iso's haven't finished propagating out to mirrors. Most that I checked a few minutes ago we're only part way though CD1. They're probably waiting for the various ftp mirrors to be updated before they announce anything.

    This .torrent release just lets a few people snag the images a bit sooner. Not really strange or shady at all.

    Hez

  81. ARRRGGGHHHH by bogie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Myth #243

    AFAIK you don't end up with a million and one useless daemons starting a la RedHat or Mandrake (yes, they are bad for this.)

    Reality

    They don't make that much a difference and there aren't that many of them. Of the ones there are you can disable whatever you want simply from the commandline or from a nice gui. What makes distros "slow" is when you try to run Gnome or KDE on a older machine. These daemons only take a few megs and most of the time simply idle.

    Red Hat running Blackbox or XFCE is a fast as Gentoo running Blackbox or XFCE. Carve that into your chest with a knife and then show every Gentoo you can find. We need to get the word out...

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:ARRRGGGHHHH by iantri · · Score: 1
      How 'bout another comparison? Care to explain how a virgin Mandrake install (Mandrake is worse than this than RedHat, IMHO) is siginifigantly slower (in KDE) than a virgin RedHat install?

      Also note that Mandrake comes with the kitchen sink, while RedHat installs a more reasonable default set of packages..

  82. Thanks.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    I'd have to say (as you've mentioned) just about all distro's are/have been guilty of this. I'd hope the LSB has adressed that, but I don't honestly know (I've been on since 7.2 and since 8.0 pretty much solely). I can say I've been using Redhat on a (remote) dedicated server and haven't had any trouble finding everything where I expect it and I have been doing a good deal of configuration by hand (ssh, no X, with Pico).

    --
    Quack, quack.
  83. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iSlash.org?

  84. Re:here comes the torre%BVNO CARRIER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.shareaza.com

    Another nice Windows BT client (and a few other 'networks')

  85. Why not DVD's? by skSlashDot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Speaking of budget Linux CD's, is there a reason that few if any of the regular CD vendors offer DVD-R's? Not that I don't love getting a whole stack of ten (10) Debian CD's in the mail!

    I expect the next version of Debian will need to ship on a spindle pack, OR maybe more companies will offer DVD's instead!

    Mandrake has a DVD available, but it's not free or even budget-priced, or wasn't the last time I checked. I don't really need all the extra non-free stuff they bundle in; I just don't like swapping discs.

    Debian has a DVD available, but you have to install their funky little tool in order to download it. Not worth my time. Somebody, please just sell me the stupid disk!

    BSD looks like it has a DVD, but it's also non-budget priced.

    I haven't checked any other distributions yet, but would welcome recommendations.

    Why aren't there more DVD distros out there?

    1. Re:Why not DVD's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well lesse here... Pioneer DVD-R/RW writer: $160CDN, DVD-R 4x media: ~$2 each, 4.7GB of data burned in 15 minutes.

      Yeah, that's real slow and real expensive... And just about EVERY DVD drive will read a DVD-R.

    2. Re:Why not DVD's? by TheFr00n · · Score: 1

      It's not free, but SuSE also comes on a DVD. Well actually it comes in this neat little fold out cardboard thing with 7 CDs + 1 DVD. I like SuSE's box, it's really big and chunky, makes me feel like I bought something.

      --
      "By Grabthar's Hammer, what a savings."
  86. LinuxIso.org - just like mom used to burn by dgp · · Score: 1

    LinuxISO.org has been around for a long time. They dont burn CDs, they just provide a place to d/l ISOs from.

  87. Re:suX0rs by Arandir · · Score: 1

    And they I fell in love with sys V init scripts. That now I don't seem to like anything with out it.

    From my experience, the time I save by dragging and dropping symlinks around the SysV init maze via a GUI is simply not worth it, since I only need to do that task *ONCE*. I only ever use reboot, halt and multiuser, so I don't need the other twenty nine run levels. So explain to me again the obvious advantages of SysV versus BSD inits again?

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  88. You could have done the same on Mandrake by buchanmilne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because a distro has KDE and 100 services, doens't mean you should start them all on your 166MMX.

    In general, no distro is faster or more bloated than any other (some compile with fewer features, and thus may have a slight edge, until you need the feature ..), you could have tried a minimal Mandrake install and done your configuration manually, and been up and running in under a day ...

  89. Re:suX0rs by lp_bugman · · Score: 1

    In my mind the flexibility comes not only from having an order and index of start upt and shutdown commands... But from regular system administration tasks:
    /etc.init.d/smb status
    /etc.init.d/network restart
    in scripts:

    if X'/etc/init.d/httpd status' -eq X"DOWN" then
    /etc/init.d/httpd restart
    fi

    and so fort. Of course you can allways go and use ps + grep + kill + (depending daemon, program pars, etc) to do this tasks but is so much clean to use Sys V scripts. And standard in all scripts.

    Add now that you don't have to know exactly how to exit cleanly an application you know that /etc/init.d/ stop will do fine.
    This is the case of database servers.


    I'm not saying that BSD init (Slackware) is bad is just more primitive and less "clean".

    --
    BSD licensed software can't be stolen....
  90. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's very good. this guy gets modded down as a troll and the parent post is modded as insightful??? moderators. go figure.

  91. Lost humor by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    The humor of this post is lost without the parent. Evidently noone knew who Mandark was. :(

    The mods make me sad.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  92. Re:explane me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i dont hav program called notpad. can i use th vim???

  93. Re:Why? by yomegaman · · Score: 1

    I think they posted it to give the Gentoo users an outlet for their pent-up zealotry. Somebody's got to look out for them, you know... :-)

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  94. new poll idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an idea for the next Slashdot poll.

    Q: Who is more stupid:

    1) HanzoSan
    2) The people who modded up his ridiculous posts

    Hey Hanzo, what happened to TransGaming? Don't tell me you're cheating on them with Mandrake!

  95. Re:suX0rs by Arandir · · Score: 1

    I'm not saying that BSD init (Slackware) is bad is just more primitive and less "clean".

    You ought to take a look at the new RCng of NetBSD and FreeBSD. It's not exactly equivalent, because SysV and BSD have different goals with init, but much of it is similar. In fact, you can dump (and several ports do) most SysV scripts into /etc/rc.d (or better in /usr/local/etc/rc.d), and they just work. And without link farms from hell. Much cleaner than the typical SysV linkfarms I've seen.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  96. Re:Why? by MoThugz · · Score: 1
    I don't follow this distro (Im a RedHat user)...


    And I'm sorry.
  97. dead link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The links to the torrents seems dead. Does anyone have a mirror?

    Please =)

  98. dead link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link to the torrents seems dead. Does anyone have a mirror for the torrents?

  99. English rant by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    I think Levi's being overly vulgar and offensive, but really you shouldn't use a phrase until you understand it. What is "begging the question?" It's certainly not a question begging to be asked. You would say "which invites the question: $QUESTION".

    Before you jump on your Grammar Nazi bandwagon: languages, like other protocols, are for communicating. If you bugger up the protocol, expect to get poor results out of the communication (QED - and if you don't understand what QED means, now would be a good time to look that up too). If you don't understand all of a protocol, stick to the bits you do understand. That's not anally retentive, that's common sense.

    Trying to make yourself sound posh by lacing your posts with semi-understood "in" phrases generally ends up with you looking like a bozo, even if nobody overtly calls you on your presumptions.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
    1. Re:English rant by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      I think Levi's being overly vulgar and offensive

      Yeah, sometimes I can get that way... for some reason it happens around this time of year and in late February and early March. It's gotta be Mandrake's release schedule... ;o)

    2. Re:English rant by siskbc · · Score: 1
      I think Levi's being overly vulgar and offensive, but really you shouldn't use a phrase until you understand it. What is "begging the question?" It's certainly not a question begging to be asked. You would say "which invites the question: $QUESTION".

      I apologize to all grammar police out there, but given how many times I've seen this on slashdot, I'm probably using the phrase in the same vernacular as most of the rest of the people here.

      Interestingly enough, your own source listed my use in the definition, though it advised that such usage is "substandard" for "academics." As I'm not an academic in grammar, rather chemistry, I'll readily accept that.

      Before you jump on your Grammar Nazi bandwagon: languages, like other protocols, are for communicating. If you bugger up the protocol, expect to get poor results out of the communication

      No, I'll actually stick with the grammar nazi bit. This isn't a publication, and everyone understood what I meant. That's good enough for me, as I'm not a copy editor. I might also introduce you to the concept of "vernacular." Sometimes when your grammar is too correct, it's intimidating and completely unconversational.

      (QED - and if you don't understand what QED means, now would be a good time to look that up too).

      Quantum ElectroDynamics. And I also know how to do proofs, also, thanks.

      If you don't understand all of a protocol, stick to the bits you do understand. That's not anally retentive, that's common sense.

      First, people learn by doing, so if you never try new things and screw up, you don't learn, and I don't find that to be a tenable position. Second, yes, that actually is quite anal-retentive. People don't usually like people who criticize widely-accepted, if technically incorrect, usages of words.

      Trying to make yourself sound posh by lacing your posts with semi-understood "in" phrases generally ends up with you looking like a bozo, even if nobody overtly calls you on your presumptions.

      See above. I also really don't care what people on slashdot think about me, as I'm quite secure with my intellect. If it gives someone a better day because they're able to increase their sense of self-superiority at my expense, I'm glad to oblige.

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    3. Re:English rant by paz5 · · Score: 1

      In popular usage, however, the phrase is often taken to be synonymous with "raising the question".

      Thats from your begging the question link. By what it says your both right. The orriginal meaning was not raising or inviting the question, but because the popular use is as such, that makes it so.

      This isnt here to piss ya off.... just to make the other guy (too lazy to go back and look at name) realize that he is still kinda right.

  100. A MANDRAKE HOWTO The Complete Step-by-Step Gui by mandrakewilson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    New web site up on how to set up mandrake 9.1 to ease the configuration pains of the new linux user. Written and catered for the moderate computer user. It covers how to get and install mandrake and add in most of the needed applications. Covers most of the major software included in the distribution, other freely available applications, newbie command line tutorial, how to handle some common and annoying bugs peculiar to each application.

    PART I
    1. Introduction
    2. Indispensable Tools for the Linux User
    3. Useful links

    PART II - Mandrake Installation
    1. Getting Mandrake 9.1
    2. Installing Mandrake 9.1
    3. Going through the install sequence
    4. Using Mandrake
    5. Nice things to add easily
    6. Configuration with Mandrake Control Center
    7. Configuration with Gnome Control Center
    8. Important Configuration of Menus and MIME Types
    9. More Advanced Configuration

    PART III - Linux Shell and Apps
    1. Navigating around terminal
    2. Shells -- bash, csh, rsh, sh
    3. Environments and Paths
    4. File Permissions
    5. Editing files
    6. Linking
    7. Finding Files
    8. Using grep
    9. Basic bash scripts knowledge
    10. Running Remote X applications
    11. Mounting Remote File Systems
    12. Language setup for man pages
    13. Handling Print Jobs

    PART IV - Software Packages
    1. What are packages?
    2. Specifying Sources For Online Downloading - Mandrake Mirrors, Texstar, PLF
    3. Packages to be installed from Mandrake CDs - Mesa, mplayer, Timidity, pan, gaim, mozplugger
    4. Packages to install from Texstar - Macromedia Flash, nano, Real Player
    5. Mplayer and Codecs
    6. Other essential packages- Open Office, Sun Java, Adobe Acrobat 5, BitTorrent
    7. Setting up SMB share for Windows
    8. Using vncserver for remote desktop applications
    9. File Sharing - p2p networks - Limewire, edonkey, lmule
    10. Running M$ Office under Linux.
    11. Games - SNES, MAME, WineX

    PART V - Advanced FAQ
    1. How do I get DRI 3D acceleration to work?
    2. Mandrake Fonts Deuglification and Anti-aliasing
    3. Email Clients and Web Browsers (Handling mailto: and http:)
    4. Full Mozilla Plugins Configuration (Quicktime, Java, Flash, Mplayer)
    5. Konquerer Plugins Configuration
    6. X Windows xmatrix screensaver
    7. How to adjust the sound volume permanently

    This HOWTO is my first contribution to the linux user community, and since I have found documentation sorely lacking for the total newbie, I have decided to write one myself. It is based on my experience in the past month trying to install everything from scratch. This HOWTO will be short, brief and to the point. Further information can be found in documentations on other websites, this one is just for the impatient, and users who want to reduce their startup time. Why Mandrake? Firstly, it is easy-to-install, and the first distribution that I've tried that has come very close to the ease-of-use of windows. If you can install and customize windows, you will not have much trouble with the Linux installation. Who is this HOWTO written for? This document is meant for the average user who is at least accustomed to tweaking and customizing their own OS. It will definitely not be a tutorial on how to point and click or use GUI interfaces.

  101. bigger buttons by lemody · · Score: 1

    it's all about big buttons. i hope they have bigger ones than in upcoming LONGhorn .... software business is sexy...

    --


    class he-man extends man!
  102. RC2 is out already by xWeston · · Score: 1

    They changed the date and changed it from RC1 to RC2

    August 28th, 2003 - Mandrake 9.2RC2 - Yes it's going to be available soon :-) Anyway, many mirroirs aren't ready yet, so more details about this first release candidate later. If you can't wait, use BitTorrent to catch the ISOs. And you can even already discuss the RC.

  103. Since such blatant advertising is now allowed... by davmoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I'm sure that the powers that be at Slashdot will not mind it at all if I mention that I have also been making discs of the betas available for sale at http://www.getlinuxcheap.us.

    In reality, I highly object to such blatant advertising disguised as a supposed "news" story. But I'm posting my url here because, simply stated, if Slashdot sees nothing wrong with plugging that site, then as a loyal Slashdot member for many years I expect to be accorded the same treatment.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  104. IMO some good stuff for 9.2(beta,RCx,final) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, getting the release candidate and upgrading a few rpms to the final versions means you avoid the rush when the final is released.
    Second, I run mandrake cooker from which snapshots are taken for the RC, a few things I have noticed
    a) on boot there is a much more professional lilo/boot splash
    b) its getting really smart, plug in a usb camera and
    an icon appears on the desktop, it adds a /etc/fstab entry for you and automounts it.
    c) unless gnome really gets a move on 9.2 will have gnome 2.4beta. It'll be a close thing and IMO they should wait for 2.4.
    d) netprofiles, in the age of wireless networking a big plus to be able to switch connection settings simply without ifup and dhclient (i know its not hard for some)

  105. You are teh oxymoron by I+KNOW+MARTIAL+ARTS · · Score: 1

    Which incongrous, contradictary terms have been combined?

  106. You were probably missing mod_php by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

    I don't remember being able to select PHP in the "Categories" screen, so did you select php in the "Custom selection" or whatever screen? If you did, you may have missed the fact that php comes in different flavours, since it is not only a web-based language, you can run php scripts on the CLI with php-cli.

    You were probably missing the mod_php package:
    # urpmi mod_php
    This would probably give you a choice between a mod_php for apache 1 or apache 2, you just have to choose which one you want.

    Of course, not all the php features are in one package, so for mysql you may also need to:
    # urpmi php-mysql

  107. Can someone please moderate this hissy fit down?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    To the two children concerned - your tantrums are just a waste of space to everyone else. If you must demonstrate your complete lack of maturity, please do so without abusing your Karma bonus so the rest of the world doesn't have to read about it.

    Thank you :)

  108. NOTE: MANDRAKE HOWTO ... website installs adware! by thehunger · · Score: 1
    This is a LAME attempt to exploit open source by leveraging the interest in the new Mandrake beta. So this guy apparently writes some lame HOWTO guide that contains info anybody could've gotten out of FAQs.

    "This HOWTO will be short, brief and to the point" really means "I didn't bother doing any research so I could include anything that would be worth your while"

    Then this guy creates a simple website that WILL TRY TO INSTALL AD/SPYWARE when you visit it. This guy pretends to help but really is only trying to lure people to get his ad/spyware installed.

    Boycott this LAME website!

  109. Re:PPC release? by G�tz · · Score: 1
    There are no PPC prereleases. There will be a final 9.2 for the PPC,I guess. The main development for Mandrake is on x86, there aren't enough people willing to develop Mandrake for the PPC to justify the reservation of mirror space and bandwith for the development version.

    If you want to participate in the Mandrake PPC development, you can find more information in the Mandrake Ports Wiki.

  110. Paid? Ha! by timothy · · Score: 1

    Actually, the two people whose mention of the R1's availability are listed in this story are simply the first two submitters who I saw that linked to it. Things don't always work that way (often submissions are unrunnable for some reason or another ... broken links, baffling content, etc, too many submissions on a given topic for us to use them all, etc.), but in this case it did.

    Addressing the idea that this is an ad, the answer is pretty easy: Nope -- it's not. :)

    [Second layer answer is, there are always going to be people who will actually be convinced by any such answer that the exact opposite is true, to which I can only shrug and think of other things. For nearly any Slashdot post, I guess you could come up with a theory that it was paid for by someone to promote commercial interests in some manner. One guy in this thread suggests -- jokingly -- that budgetlinuxcds was linked to by a competitor.]

    So, thanks to adjacent submissions about the release, I linked to a bittorrent file and a company selling cheap ISOs by mail.
    (I'd never heard of budgetlinuxcds before this post, but a quick google search convinced me they seemed legitimate; I *can* vouch that I've been a happy cheapbytes customer, though.)

    If you have bandwidth and interest, the bittorent seems like a good idea; if you have only the interest part, maybe a mailed ISO makes sense. For a good part of yesterday, I was working from a slow dialup connection, and wasn't about to download 3 CDs worth of data ;) YMMV, and probably does.

    A lot of stories on Slashdot mention companies or their products, sometimes with links to particular ones. This is because we're interested in a particular technology or product, for good or ill.

    (On the front page right now is a story that there are two new models of the Roomba automated vacuum cleaner. I realize there are people who sincerely believe that this means Roomba and Slashdot are plotting to promote Roomba in secret Dr. Strangelove black-and-white war-room sessions. Nope to that one, too.)

    Is every mention of AMD an advertisement for AMD? Game reviews are often positive, and often link to merchants selling the games mentioned. [Conspiracy.] Should we replace every company or product name (and their URLS) with asterices? What if I'd linked to several ISO providers (adding in cheapbytes, say)? Should every link to commercial sites or mentioning available products in a positive light be stripped from submissions? These are supposed to be rhetorical questions ( ;) !) , but I'm sure some people really believe the answer to that last one is Yes.

    I think if I *had* linked to cheapbytes, an instant conspiracy theory would pop up that Slashdot posts are really the manifestation of shadowy bidding wars among low-margin free software purveyors, who are using their vast gains to purchase evil patent portfolios from gnomes, take over the world, etc etc. (I have seen one episode of the animated show "Stripperella" -- it was about the world's cheapest criminal mastermind; he might want to get it on this at the ground floor ...)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:Paid? Ha! by joeldg · · Score: 1

      Well,
      In fact, I was really more joking than anything.. I do get the fact that 'yes, I am fully aware that not every Apple post is a conspiracy' etc etc..
      It was more the fact that budgetlinuxcds's was linked to two or more times in the article. I suppose if a selection was given then people could not actually come to the conclusion that people are paying for links.. (which you have to admit is not a bad idea... the current company I work for would 'probably' pay you $400 to link a story on us, I mean, crap it will always bring a flood of people, albeit not all are interested in purchasing anything.)
      So, to respond in full, I am fully aware it is not an ad, it would be a shame to see you guys go that way but in reality if you could get away with it, it could be rather lucrative, but at the possible cost of readership.. Sorry if I offended with my post, I doubt I did, but my apologies anyway.
      I've been a reader for years now, and slashdot is one of the few actual communities on the net that is functional and keeps itself in check (however I would personally change the moderation system to something that is not a -2 to 5 point system, tha tis just too limiting) .. so my main issue with the post is link to cheapbytes along with budgetlinuxcds and you will probably not have people over-speculation what the motives are.

      Cheers
      Joel De Gan
      Lead developer, Zipa LLC.

      CTO TAGword/Broadwords

  111. Re:NOTE: MANDRAKE HOWTO ... website installs adwar by mandrakewilson · · Score: 1

    That thing is beyond my control. It is from the URL redirection I use with cjb.net. If you are not using Internet Exploder, those cjb ads should not work on you. And since you are using IE, this web site might not be meant for you anyway. So boycott your own Windows XX before you boycott my website.

    And it is not that short, this website took me months to prepare, since the release of Mandrake 9.1. There's one more thing I will add in on the miscellaneous section, probably a LaTeX guide in a bit after I explore it a bit more.

    In short, this web site is by users for users, not by a developer for a user, so I hope it helps MY INTENDED AUDIENCE.

  112. Re:NOTE: MANDRAKE HOWTO ... website installs adwar by sitor · · Score: 1

    Don't you get discouraged by this bully. He'd better do something constructive instead of trying to discredit a very good initiative.

    I'm running Mandrake now for a couple of months. I have left the Windoze world almost completely behind me (at least at home, at work I don't have a choice). And that is mainly because of the help of your HOWTO. How wonderfull Mandrake might be as distribution, without the help of a HOWTO such as yours there is still quite a lot of stuff that a newbie needs a lot of time finding out via other sources. Having it all together in one source is very time saving and thus improves the userfriendliness of Mandrake again a lot.

    I sincerely hope that you will continue your efforts. Mandrake 9.2 is coming up ;-).

    Ciao,

    Sitor

  113. Missing package by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

    I tried to install Mandrake 9.2 RC 1 on a 486 Intel machine but repeatedly ran into the same problem regarding a missing package. I don't know the name of the package since the installer didn't specify it. I tried installing with danish language support, then english, but both failed. Then I tried the minimum install (without WineX and documentation), but that failed too. The harddisk was formatted and mounted as "/".
    Does Mandrake 9.2 work with 486 processors or what else am I doing wrong? I'm currently downloading Mandrake 9.1 to see if that also fails. HELP!

    1. Re:Missing package by sn0wflake · · Score: 1

      I was (finally) told that MandrakeLinux-9.2rc1-CD1.i586.iso won't run on a 486 computer (doh!). Only question now is why didn't Mandrake explain me that the computer is incompatible and then simply quit?

    2. Re:Missing package by Yosho · · Score: 1

      While I agree it'd be a nice option for it to say that it doesn't work on 486 processors, it should be pretty obvious if you look at the filename -- the "i586" means it only works on 586 (aka Pentium) or better processors. I'm not aware if there are currently any builds of the 9.2 RC for 486s, unfortunately.

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
  114. Mandrake mentions /. by h8macs · · Score: 1

    Mandrake mentions /. as a place to discuss the new release.

    Too bad so many pedantic holier than though trolls are whining about the post by a distributor of CD's. Who cares. The post is about a new release of a great distribution, not the horrors of monopolistic industry advertising and exploitation.

    It would be very cool to actually focus on discussing and possibly improving upon the distribution. Come on guys, we are supposed to be building upon the "news for nerds, stuff that matters" credo, not defaming it by filling the board with BS.

    Let's see some real posts, let's hear what people think about the latest release. Let's see if we can't prevent some of the most annoying of bugs from being released. Let's share pertinent and valuable information.

    Any actual on-topic posts?

    --
    :-( --- argh. Despair, I owe again. :-b
    1. Re:Mandrake mentions /. by lester_mt · · Score: 1
      Good point! I finally got the dist [via modem]. Not bad at all. I did get random freezes during setup. I installed 5 times and finally got through. Crashed during package selection 4 times - thank goodness package selection can be saved to floppy ;-)

      The last crash occured at the end of the setup just before the bit that asks for reboot. The boot loader was installed though so not a problem. Drake just checked the disks on reboot and loaded up fine :)

      I did get this during setup of 9.1b2. I don't get any probs at all with the release of 9.1 tho I'm pleased to say. Thought this might help out the dudes writing the installer. I've got an epox8k3a mb with AMD1800+ cpu, 512mb DDR. Hope that helps.

      Also, can't get the sound working. Have via and I noticed there are 2 drivers included. With 9.1, I just select the alternate driver and it works fine. But 9.2 doesn't :(

      I should have posted this with new subject but haven't worked out how to do that sorry :(

      But all in all, a mighty fine dist!

      cheers Lester

  115. Mandrake .. the Gentoo way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking that can't we have an alternate way of installing Mandrake than the present one. An alternate intallation procedure can be developed wherein the users who want to compile the packages can do so automatically. they just need to provide the CFLAGS etc for optimisations for their architecture and the rest can be done automatically. this way the installation period may get elongated but the system would finally rock!
    I think taking up source rpms and compiling them can be very easily automated.

  116. Re: support for audigy platinum 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really liked mandrake 9.0 & 9.1 but I'm too much of a noob to get it to work with the above soundcard, even though I gather partial 3rd party support is available. Anyone know if 9.2 will support it natively? Thanks, A.Coward

  117. MDK changes since 8.1 by rickst29 · · Score: 1
    These are my very personal opinions:

    MDK 8.2 was very good, cleaning up a lot of 8.1 packaging issues (and using a much better version of the kernel).

    MDK 9.0 was messy: with the GCC 2.9 --> GCC 3.x incompatibilities not yet addressed at that time, MDK seemed much less stable and much less 'integrated'. IMHO 9.0 sucked, I moved my test machine back down until the 9.1 RCs (my production machine went directly from 8.2 to 9.1).

    MDK 9.1 has been very good, and I expect MDK 9.2 to be even better. (Then I expect things to go back downhill for a while, while bugs are driven out of 2.6 and its hardware drivers...).