Slashdot Mirror


MPlayer 1.0Pre1 Is Here

bfree writes "Now on your favourite mplayer mirror you can find the 1.0Pre1 release of Mplayer! While work is underway on a second-generation version of Mplayer, I have already fired off emails to my Windows-based friends to let them now that the one player to rule them all now has (preview) support for their OS (I've only looked at a precompiled command line version on Windows but it handled everything I threw at it so far except DVDs). Big changes include Windows (via mingw32 and cygwin) ports, as well as Mac OS X (with extra-accurate Darwin timers). Now if only all those legal questions would go away, perhaps we could have a new killer Free Software application to save people installing Real, Quicktime and Windows Media Player (on Linux!?) or perhaps it's the one application to finally tell the **AA where the world wants to go today!"

363 comments

  1. kplayer by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 2, Funny

    Duh, you don't use gmplayer in KDE, you use mplayer or kplayer instead.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
    1. Re:kplayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Duh, you don't use gmplayer in KDE, you use
      > mplayer or kplayer instead.

      Sigh, let's get this straight:
      * Use gmplayer on GNOME
      * kplayer on KDE
      * mplayer on Mac

  2. Whoa by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 2, Funny
    "one player to rule them all."

    Let us not hope Sauron - err, Bill Gates - gets to it!

    1. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, everyone knows vlc is the one

  3. Now by AnimeFreak · · Score: 0

    It would be nice to see some of MPlayer's source code merged with another project, Media Player Classic.

    1. Re:Now by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Why? MPC already is perfect, no need to mangle it with lesser code. ;)

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  4. What would make the ultimate player... by Channard · · Score: 5, Interesting

    .. would be a feature that could play DVDs from any region on Windows regardless of how many changes the OS thinks you've got left. Currently, even if your DVD-Rom is region-free, Windows XP and 2000 are real swines when it comes to standing in the way of region-free playback.

    1. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Dicky · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean something like this?.

      --
      Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
    2. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by pbettendorff · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have a look at VideoLAN http://www.videolan.org/ and don't be confused by the name :-)

    3. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Channard · · Score: 1

      Yep, but with all the features - saving streaming content, multi-region DVD playing, etc, in one single player.

    4. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by xybe · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nah, probably something like this Availiable for major destkop platforms.

    5. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1

      I thought that these days the DVD-ROM firmware controls the number of available region changes, not OS or the playback software.

    6. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by k98sven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought that these days the DVD-ROM firmware controls the number of available region changes, not OS or the playback software.

      Yup.. of course, that doesn't stop programs like the one mentioned above from sitting inbetween the firmware and the OS/playback software and giving it different numbers.

      However, there are quite a lot of places where you can get region-free firmware..
      Flash once and liberate your drive from geographical restrictions forever!

    7. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      fitting inbetween the firmware and the OS/playback software and giving it different numbers

      Doesn't the firmware lock the drive if it thinks that the maximum region change count has been reached?

    8. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Channard · · Score: 4, Informative
      However, there are quite a lot of places [rpc1.org] where you can get region-free firmware.. Flash once and liberate your drive from geographical restrictions forever!

      Which is what I did, and it worked fine with Windows 98 and 95, after I just deleted a registry setting. However, 2000 and XP are, in my experience, a lot more tricky and recreated the registry setting on reloading and needed some DVD Genie style software to work. It seems later vers of Windows do more to stop you playing DVDs you legally own yet which the manufacturers have decided should be viewed only in certain countries.

    9. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by mattwolfewvu · · Score: 1
      Even better:

      DVD Genie

      Plus find a program called RPCDE (cause I'm not sure exactly where I got it and a quick google look didn't find it. Then use WinDVD or PowerDVD or whatever came with your drive or you have purchased, and you're set.

      --
      "I think that when you become a Republican, you don't get to score any more." -- Butt-head
    10. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      a lot more tricky and recreated the registry setting on reloading and needed some DVD Genie style software to work.

      Do you have any links on that? I'm running XP Pro and I just flashed a new auto-resetting firmware on my LG DVD-ROM. It should reset the region count back to 5 every time the computer restarts.

    11. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Do you have any links to that? I've got an LG combo drive, and would like to find something similar for it.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    12. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 4, Informative
      You can find the firmware packages here. You have to create a DOS boot disk (ie. you cannot update the firmware in Windows). The ZIP file contains both the flash utility and the firmware. Just make sure you download the correct firmware. Also note that there are some special firmwares for OEM drive versions.

      I did a successful flash and now my LG DVD-ROM 8161B works perfectly! The auto-reset firmware sets the available number of region changes to the maximum every time I boot the computer. Neat!

    13. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by datamaxx · · Score: 1

      for 35 bucks there abouts you can emlimate that problem 'AnyDVD' for windoz-- it tells billy what ever he thinks he wants to hear for a region code
      nice idea -- sort of a driver driver
      http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11297
      has the details

    14. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by GiMP · · Score: 1

      The firmware limits what the drive will accept, the DVD software player must also accept multiple regions. On Linux, this isn't a problem.. but in Windows, most/all DVD players are region-locked as well.. that program unlocks the player, but does not unlock the drive :(

      Some drives can be made region-free, some cannot.

    15. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by RDW · · Score: 1

      Luckily, Windows users can now also take advantage of ported libdvdcss-based players (like Videolan vlc) that can crack the DVD encryption by a plaintext attack without the co-operation of the drive, irrespective of region. This doesn't require an RPC1 drive firmware hack (RPC2 drives are usually fine), and happens very rapidly on recent PCs.

    16. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by RDW · · Score: 1

      >Doesn't the firmware lock the drive if it thinks that the maximum region change count has been reached?

      If you use player software like the Videolan client (vlc), the region counter is never incremented and playback is not dependent on region status, even with RPC2 (firmware-locked) drives. Playing region-mismatched DVDs by normal mechanisms (i.e. using an officially licensed player program, which depends on decryption key exchange with the co-operation of the drive) is prevented by RPC2 firmware, but nothing stops raw data being read from the drive. And since vlc knows how to decrypt DVD movie data all by itself...

    17. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 1
      Videolan client (vlc), the region counter is never incremented and playback is not dependent on region status, even with RPC2 (firmware-locked) drives

      Doesn't that mean that vlc could be judged illegal in the future? I mean it is obviously circumventing the region code protection.

    18. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by RDW · · Score: 1

      I suppose that depends on how many lawyers and politicians you can afford! I guess (IANAL) VLC has the same legal status as any other program that removes CSS encryption, including most of the Linux players (VLC's region independence is a bonus that depends on the program's ability to decrypt DVD movies in general). What this status is may vary with where you live. The Videolan FAQ states that "The use and distribution of the libdvdcss library is controversial in a few countries such as the United States because of a law called the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act). If you are unsure about the legality of using and distributing this library in your country, please consult your lawyer."

    19. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Thanks!

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    20. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Ya VLC is awesome.
      VLC is the one player to rule them all.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    21. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Have done. As far as I can tell, VideoLAN is
      the *only* stable and free vehicle for DiVX and
      DVD on Mac OS X. On Windows, it is not, however,
      stable.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    22. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by i_am_nitrogen · · Score: 1

      Does VideoLAN support NAV? I use Ogle and Xine right now because I have several DVD's that don't use title 1 for the movie, and it seems wasteful to use a TOC listing program to find the longest title and play that, when the disc menus already know what the correct title is.

    23. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When dvdnav support in mplayer was disabled it made me really really mad.

    24. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by thumperward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh god, the moderators got it wrong again. VLC can't circumvent your drive's firmware, which is the only way to get rid of region-coding on all drives. CSS isn't the same as region coding.

      - Chris

    25. Re:What would make the ultimate player... by shellbeach · · Score: 1
      I thought that these days the DVD-ROM firmware controls the number of available region changes, not OS or the playback software.

      Well, I can tell you that I have successfully used my Liteon 16x DVD-ROM with discs from Region 4, Region 1 and Region 2 (in that order of frequency) under linux without problems. But then I don't know whether this drive has any region setting (I live in Australia, and I think there might be some anti-region legislation here or something, since many DVD players are sold region-free?) The main thing is, the drive just works and doesn't prevent me watching DVDs from different regions - and that's all I care about :)

      (I've only ever used it under Windows once so can't comment on what it's like under that OS)

  5. I can't give up windows yet but have been... by rokzy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    moving towards Free software. I have Firebird and Thunderbird and a Free file player was next on my list. so horray. but where do I get it?

    1. Re:I can't give up windows yet but have been... by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:I can't give up windows yet but have been... by Replicant7 · · Score: 1

      MPlayer is the answer, it works fine on Windows. Get the command line version or a version with installer that takes over file associations.

  6. Surely by archonon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mplayer rule them all? Yeah right, I guess Linux that zealots haven't ever heard Zoom Player. (It rules already)
    Zoom Player

    --

    http://archonon.sytes.net/
    1. Re:Surely by Deusy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll start by giving the direct link to Zoom Player.

      I'll follow up by shedding light on why we haven't heard about it:

      "Zoom Player Standard remains Free for Non-Commercial use, while Zoom Player Professional comes in a Fully Functional (uncrippled) trial version and requires registration ($19.95 U.S.)."

      Didn't you know? We're Free Software advocates, not free software advocates.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    2. Re:Surely by jgarland79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yea.. Zoom player. That wouldn't play my streaming mpeg video from ffserver either. Seems the only player that will is mplayer.

      --
      Microsoft Windows runs on stress and frustration.
    3. Re:Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Don't be daft, its a well known fact that Linux Zealots dont listen to anything Windows users have to say.

    4. Re:Surely by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      and afaik/everything/blablaa zoom player is just a regular player that doesn't decode anything itself(relies entirely on 3rd party codecs) even for dvd playback. bsplayer is a nice equivalent for something that just plays content through codecs on windows.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Didn't you know? We're Free Software advocates, not free software advocates.


      In which case "we" wouldn't be advocating MPlayer either as the only major difference between it and other players is it's support for Windows DLLs, which are definately non-Free.
    6. Re:Surely by jilles · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's plenty of oss players too. Bsplayer (bsplayer.org) and media player classic (http://sourceforge.net/projects/guliverkli/) come to mind. Both are excellent players and play anything you can throw at it (including DVDs if you have the right codecs installed). However, they use the ms media player codecs so they are not completely free. However, if you are on windows that is not necessarily a bad thing.

      --

      Jilles
    7. Re:Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By your "logic" we shouldn't run Linux either, because I can install Adobe Acrobat reader.

    8. Re:Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buddy, MPlayer "rules them all" because it plays Quicktime, WMV, WMA, MPEG1/2/3/4, Ogg Vorbis, AVI, Real, DVD, VCD, and a bunch of other formats. Wi-diots like you wouldn't know however, since it hasn't run on Windows until this release.

    9. Re:Surely by ANTI · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sure.

      Zoom Player was the only useable player on windows.
      (I'm forced to use XP on our university machines.)

      I just grabbed mplayer 1.0pre1 and build it on one of these boxes.

      I have to say ... zoom player will be deleted from all boxes withing the next few days (if I find the time).
      I doesn't even stand a chance against mplayer...

      Why ?
      Resource usage. (Memory and CPU)
      # of supported codecs.
      Even plays broken files. (And I get a lot of those from my students.)

      --
      On the other side of the screen it all looked so easy.
    10. Re:Surely by BlackBolt · · Score: 1

      It doesn't run on Linux. No good to me. Sorry.

    11. Re:Surely by archonon · · Score: 1

      ..but Zoom Player plays them all also ;) But would linux fanatic know that? ;)

      --

      http://archonon.sytes.net/
    12. Re:Surely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, the only thing crippled in the latest version of zoomplayer is DVD playback...

      Just go download version 2.9 its totally uncrippled

    13. Re:Surely by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Didn't you know? We're Free Software advocates, not free software advocates.

      Maybe you are.

      What about the other 98% of the computer market?

    14. Re:Surely by korgull · · Score: 1

      It's just not better because it runs those formats to everyone.
      I never use the formats that you mention, besides DVD,VCD and avi and I can tell you that xine beats mplayer at playing DVD.

      Anyways, xine also runs these formats, so your point of "Rules them all" seems not really true.
      In fact most of these formats are supported by ffmpeg which is used by both mplayer and xine.

      VLC also is worth mentioning as it also has a windows port. Within the xine project there's also work done on a windows port, but status is not clear to me as it seems a little low priority.

  7. Damn, just installed 0.91 by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    To think, just hours before, I spend hours compiling Mplayer 0.91 and all of its codecs and deps! Well, at least I know what to do next time.

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    1. Re:Damn, just installed 0.91 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hours? I can't see why MPlayer would be more than a 10 minute install, even on older machines. Are you runing it on a 486 in BlinkenLights mode?

    2. Re:Damn, just installed 0.91 by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      I finished installing at around 0100, and the new version was released in the morning. I discovered that in the morning, but it wasnt until the evening that it was posted on slashdot. I can see why the /. Editors dont post new releases as soon as they happen, although the /. effect is inevitable as some point in time. Anyway, at least mplayer works. Now it's a question of "should I fix it? It isn't broken, just obsolete" Hmm...

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  8. legal questions by Mosu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    mplayer will never be free of legal questions. Too many libs are bundled with it, and I for one am glad about it! Compiling multimedia applications can be a major pain in the youknowwhat with all those library dependencies. Mplayer bundles the more important libs (liba52, libavcodec aka ffmpeg, and now even faad2). This makes the build process far more reliable and definitely easier.

    But what would mplayer look like without all those libs? Well just take a look at the mplayer versions shipped with major distros. They're crippled, can't play most popular/modern files, and almost everyone has to download other uncrippled binaries or compile from source. I fully understand why no mplayer developer, me included, cares about legality.

    1. Re:legal questions by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Informative
      You should grab the package from LinuxTLE. If you are on RH8.0, it should drop in without a problem. It's produced and distributed by the Thai gov't, and comes precompiled with everything they can put in there. Add this line to your apt repositories if you're using apt-rpm.
      rpm ftp://ftp2.nectec.or.th/pub/linux-distributions/Li nux_TLE/ andaman/i386/TLE main updates
      and install the following:
      • mplayer-common-0.90rc4-2_4tle
      • mplayer-skin-BlueHeart-1.4-2
      • mplayer-skin-Cyrus-1.0-2
      • mplayer-skin-hwswskin-1.0-2
      • mplayer-skin-neutron-1.4-2
      • mplayer-skin-slim-1.0-2
      • mplayer-skin-xine-lcd-1.0-2
      • mplayer-skin-avifile-1.5-2
      • mplayer-skin-CubicPlayer-1.0-2
      • mplayer-skin-gnome-1.1-2
      • mplayer-skin-netscape4-1.0-2
      • mplayer-skin-proton-1.1-2
      • mplayer-skin-xanim-1.5-2
      • mplayer-skin-AlienMind-1.0-2
      • mplayer-skin-CornerMP-aqua-1.0-2
      • mplayer-gui-0.90rc4-2_4tle
      • mplayer-skin-MidnightLove-1.5-2
      • mplayer-skin-plastic-1.1.1-2
      • mplayer-skin-WindowsMediaPlayer6-1.2-2
      • mplayer-0.90rc4-2_4tle
      • mplayer-skin-CornerMP-1.0-2
      • mplayer-skin-default-1.6-2
      • mplayer-skin-mentalic-1.1-2
      • mplayer-skin-phony-1.0-2
      • mplayer-skin-trium-1.0-2
      • mplayer-tools-0.90rc4-2_4tle
      You should then have my setup, which plays everything I have thrown at it.
    2. Re:legal questions by dabadab · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, mplayer is mostly usable without any win32 lib and that means there are no copyright problems. All you really need is libavcodec: and there are no problems with that aside from the patents, and, as of this time, these are not enforcable in Europe and I hope that it stays so.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    3. Re:legal questions by Wastl · · Score: 1

      You won't be able to play many DVDs with it, since libcss is one of the major legal problems...

      Sebastian

    4. Re:legal questions by dabadab · · Score: 2, Informative

      And what would be the problem with libcss in Europe? I am not aware of any decision against it.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    5. Re:legal questions by Wolfbone · · Score: 1

      Well there's the EUCD (~= DMCA), although decss may well qualify under a fair use exemption. I think - hope - the fair use principle will be taken more seriously in Europe than it has been in the U.S.

    6. Re:legal questions by Jonner · · Score: 1

      I don't think the problem is copyrights on the win32 libs, since they are free beer. The legal questions are DMCA and patent related. Also, some of live in the "home of the free," you insensitive clod.

    7. Re:legal questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mosu, you know perfectly well that this is pure b*llsh*t. Mplayer is a nice example of one of those all-static applications that used to make Linux the biggest pain in the ass that an end user could ever imagine. Everything included, no dynamic functions whatsoever, no plugin system, no extendibility, no application framework, nothing at all.

      One player to rule them all? F*ck them. Get real. It's probably the best player out there right now, which says more about the others than about mplayer itself, but it misses loads of features that a serious pro media framework needs to become the de facto standard. Don't think of things that it offers or that others offer; think of things that you'd *want* a pro media framework to offer. Can you imagine a NLE based on mplayer? Well, neither can I. Maybe G2 will solve some of this, but I won't make comments on things that don't exist yet.

      - BBB (media developer)

    8. Re:legal questions by Stiletto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who needs a plugin extendable "media framework" when the player simply works?

      I would counter that the big problem facing many other linux video players is the fact that they were developed as great "frameworks" but no one really worried about whether they actually played files.

      This problem exists in other projects I've downloaded and tried (I won't name names of course). The typical app is a great skinnable, plugin-able, dynamically loadable uber-framework, but when it comes down to actually performing the task it's designed for, well, that'll be ready next release.

    9. Re:legal questions by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      Compiling multimedia applications can be a major pain in the youknowwhat with all those library dependencies.

      # cd /usr/ports/multimedia/bloodyhugeapplication
      # make install clean

      What? Your OS can't do that for you? :-)

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    10. Re:legal questions by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      With affordable drives getting ever larger, consider just ripping all your DVD's and playing them from your hard drive. That copy is unencrypted (and region unlocked) so there is no need for libcss and with most home networks you can play them from any Mac or PC on the network. Saves the originals from possibly punishing use (think kids' titles) and the original serves as a backup.

    11. Re:legal questions by 13Echo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't understand. MPlayer *does* actually play files. It can stream any normal format as well. It plays all files except really obscure and useless formats.

    12. Re:legal questions by BillKaos · · Score: 1

      I don't know what legal questions are you talkin' about, but the link given in the article, the mplayer homepage, about Mplayer legal problems with EPA (Europen Patent Agency) it's only a joke of the developers, protesting against Software Patents in Europe.

      Afortunately, ATM SP have no validity in Europe.

    13. Re:legal questions by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      Compiling multimedia applications can be a major pain in the youknowwhat with all those library dependencies.

      # cd /usr/ports/multimedia/bloodyhugeapplication # make install clean

      What? Your OS can't do that for you? :-)

      <ObGentoo>
      Why no, it can't. My OS only requires one step;

      # emerge bloodyhugeapplication
      </ObGentoo>

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    14. Re:legal questions by john_shadows · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think Mplayer's dvd playing is illegal by nature - it has to decrypt the stream just to play it. On windows you have to pay for that privilege. So don't tell John Ashcroft you use MPlayer. And definitely how well it works (great!)

      --
      Will there be people in 2100? Will they be real skinny? vote : the_real_38@yahoo.com
    15. Re:legal questions by poptones · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Who needs a plugin extendable "media framework" when the player simply works?

      Anyone who wants to see linux succeed as something more than a BDD (braindeaddesktop) for consumer media playback - that's who. Without an easily extendable structure based upon standardized "pathways" every new app will have to recreate (or patch) all those codecs and media pathways.

      Ever "rip" a DVD? Without "rippers" you would have much less "free" content to play on that player. And one tool in the toolkit of most rippers is AVISynth. Try making an app like that run on a system that doesn't have an extensible media playback/authoring structure.

      I realize dependancy hell is considered the linux nirvana, but for most of the folks who DON'T want to get a fucking CS degree just so they can make their own anime music videos or dvds for grandma, this feature is an absolute necessity. I installed XP on a system two weeks ago for a young friend and within three days she had already made a few music videos. This was on a system that would not properly run either linux nor win2k - but XP just installed, worked OOTB, and in just an afternoon of playing with the thing she had crafted together her first music video from all those MPEG and AVI clips she collected from kazaa.

      Granted this was with OOTB tools and, if linux would actually run on her system (I mean, with sound and reasonably HQ video playback) I might have been able to install a primitive media authoring tool that would compete with the thing that ships with XP. So even tho it may have been more work for me, from her perspective linux would have been just as easy to use as XP.

      Except there isn't such an app for linux, really. Wonder why?

    16. Re:legal questions by chgros · · Score: 1

      That copy is unencrypted (and region unlocked) so there is no need for libcss
      And how, exactly, do you get that unencrypted copy ?
      That's right, using libdvdcss. That's even the reason it is illegal.

    17. Re:legal questions by AsparagusChallenge · · Score: 1

      Actually, this new release claims to include ATI VCR1/VCR2 decoding, which are the most obscure and useless formats I have ever met - not even after going to ATI site and hacking my way to a non-ATI card codec for Windows was I able to view a downloaded video which was on VCR2. Now, if I could just remember where I did left it...

    18. Re:legal questions by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Apparently I was being too brief in my description. You do not need libdvdcss for your media player if you choose to store your DVD's on your hard drive and play them from there. You do need to use a utility program that will unencrypt and move the content to your hard drive. None of those on Windows or the Mac require that you compile and install libdvdcss. They have that capability built in to them so you do not have to be conversant with any command shell or have a development system installed. You do need a lot of unused hard drive space.

      On the question of legality, the day they choose to make a case against someone who is backing up their own DVD's to their own hard drive for fair use purposes is the day the DMCA will be struck down as the unconstitutional police state law that it is. So I doubt that will ever happen. Just because a law is passed does not make it legitimate. This is a prime example of a law without legitimacy.

    19. Re:legal questions by korgull · · Score: 1

      You must have tried last time some years ago I guess.
      Media players like mplayer,xine or vlc are well capable of playing files.
      I never use windows and only rely on those apps and they always work for me.

    20. Re:legal questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it stream RTSP now too then? All realplayer streaming media out there that I've seen is like this rtsp://site.site/location/here.rm

    21. Re:legal questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I think you make a great point, but you'll never be able to explain the need for something to people who don't think they need it.

      MPlayer is a "BDD" tool, but that's all that it tries to be. Keep in mind that until recently, that's something that Linux didn't even have, so people are still rejoicing that they aren't shut out.

      Once people have had their fill of consuming their DivX rips, porn, and Movie adverts, maybe a few of them will start thinking about creating something (other than software!) and seek out the tools to do it.

    22. Re:legal questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes

    23. Re:legal questions by shellbeach · · Score: 1
      I would counter that the big problem facing many other linux video players is the fact that they were developed as great "frameworks" but no one really worried about whether they actually played files.

      Well, I don't know when you last tried mplayer, but it can't have been in the last six months that I've been using it, or else you're trying to play a really obscure file format. In my experience, mplayer works so well that I don't have a DVD player - I just use the TV-out on my graphics card connected to my TV (connected with 20m of A/V cable :) I've watched a lot of DVDs/DivXs with it and I find it close to perfect.

    24. Re:legal questions by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Using libdvdcss or a derivative is probably illegal because of the DMCA, a most unnatural law. This affects almost all Free Software DVD players.

  9. Link by WatertonMan · · Score: 4, Informative
    The article didn't give the link for downloading.

    Download MPlayer

    Unfortunately I only saw the Linux player there and source. I believe the OSX binary is still the July version. So there may be a delay before it is available.

    OSX MPlayer

    1. Re:Link by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 4, Informative

      win32 has been here for months now in various states of workingness. It's unstable, but less so than the newest version of wmp. If your copy doesnt work, wait a few days and download a new one. The one I'm using has been working nicely for 3 or 4 months now.

      The best part is its just like the non-windows version -- it can still play quicktime/realplayer without loading their bloated apps. It also plays xvid/divx in high res cleanly which is needed for some game moveie, something WMP and Winamp both skip for 2 seconds every 10 just to resync.(note - I'm on an amd 1800+, 256mb ram, and a gf2mx400. not entirely the highest end system ever, but enough to decode simple video.)

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    2. Re:Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you need an OSX binary, isn't OSX supposed be the greatest OS of them all ?
      Or so mac fags claim.

    3. Re:Link by Nailer · · Score: 1

      The binaries available on the MPLayer site are pretty ancient - for Red Hat 7..x. If you're using Red Hat, you'll find the download sites / yum repositories / apt repositories at FreshRPMs or Fedora.

  10. And... by Channard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .. the ability to save streaming content straight to HD wouldn't go amiss either.

    1. Re:And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      mencoder http://some-stream/ -oac copy -ovc copy -o somefile

      that works here quite nicely for saving video streams

    2. Re:And... by uhmmmm · · Score: 1

      even easier is "mplayer -dumpstream"

    3. Re:And... by andy+landy · · Score: 1

      You can achieve this quite nicely with PowerDVD 2.5 under Windows 2000/XP

      If you run pDVD as a user rather than an administrator, it can't change the region settings, so each time you put in a DVD, it says "You haven't picked a region, pick one now? 5 changes".

      Works for me!

      --
      perl -e 'print "Just another Perl newbie\n";'
  11. Re:Wow! Windows support! by sylware · · Score: 1

    mingw and cygwin dependencies could be statically linked into the mplayer exe and modules DLLs, wouldn't they?

  12. Re:Wow! Windows support! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you don't need to compile cygwin or mingw. simply download the windows version of mplayer and use it.

    (btw. cygwin is the 'hack' (posix-emulation layer in an 1MB dll file) you are talking about. mingw creates 'pure' win32 applications)

  13. Re:first post by Deusy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree gmplayer is a very poor interface.

    I much prefer Totem - although that's Gtk+ based.

    You could try KPlayer or eMotion - the only KDE/Qt alternatives I'm aware of.

    Or <flamebait>you could just switch to a better desktop</flamebait> - the perfect time now that the 2.4 release is imminent!

    --

    Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

  14. But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Xine? (Well in my opinion, xine is too buggy, crashes on most files and its gui sucks)
    Videolan? (I never tried it)
    Kmplayer? (The KDE port of mplayer, its got lovely kde goodness)
    Gstreamer? (Well gstreamer is just the library, but it has gst-player and totem as guis, but the library is still in beta, but stabler than Xine)
    Ogle?
    Xmovie?
    RealPlayer (linux version)?

    I don't have time to try it now, so id like some opinions.

    1. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Its the one. Try it and forget the rest.

    2. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by Wolfbone · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have tried Xine,Ogle,Videolan and Mplayer and found Ogle to be too primitive as yet. Xine has always worked extremely well for me (no instability) and is technically very proficient, plus it supports all the file formats I've ever needed it to. Videolan is pretty much equivalent to Xine but I don't like it's gui and it was annoying to have to build yet another gui toolkit (wxWindows) just for one app. Mplayer is in many ways technically superior to all the others and I would use it all the time except it doesn't support DVD navigation. If it ever does it would be a no-brainer, for me anyway.

      If you have had stability problems with Xine, that's unlucky because I would rate it just ahead of Videolan, usability wise. My advice would be to set aside a day or a Weekend just for building and testing Mplayer, Xine and Videolan, reading all the documentation and trying different optimizations and runtime configurations until you find the one which suits you best.

    3. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Xine? (Well in my opinion, xine is too buggy, crashes on most files and its gui sucks)
      Have you used Xine recently? It handles most, if not all of the files I've thrown at it. Now, i'll agree that the interface sucks, but one of the great features of xine (imho) is that the gui is de-coupled from the video decoding libraries. There are many other players that use xine-lib to decode the files, such as: Even more are listed on xine's website here. Totem is the only one there I can vouch for, being a gnome user myself, but the point remains that you don't have to stick with the xine-ui one.
    4. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by pantherace · · Score: 1
      One example I would not be proud of comparing to mplayer is OpiePlayer2. As the person who originally ported mplayer to the zaurus :) I have found that OpiePlayer2's (xine-based) playback is very choppy, and while the sound sounds good, trying to watch videos on it is mostly just a pain. Xmms-embedded, which uses mplayer to play video on the other hand is just great, very little skips if the file isn't messed up.

      I will give Xine points for getting a hell of a lot better, but frankly compared to mplayer it's slow (and when working with 100~500 MHz machines it makes a big difference) and has only a few video outputs (vs mplayer's ability to play video to practically anything that has a screen, and interface to it). It also does dvd-nav which mplayer currently can't, but will be able to in mplayer-g2, which has a new architechure which doesn't have the limitations which currently make dvd-nav impossible, or at least highly difficult to implement.

      Good luck to the Xine team catching up to mplayer though.

    5. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by mijok · · Score: 1

      I've tried quite a few other players before (including xine) but mplayer is by far the best one I've ever found - it plays whatever you throw at it. That means, eg. that if you go to a crippled web page (ie. one viewable with a certain browser only...) just look at the source to get the url: whateverprotocol://link.to/the/movie/file.format and then cut'n paste to "mplayer whateverprotocol://link.to/the/movie/file.format" in an xterm (or whatever you use) and you'll see it :)

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    6. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by 13Echo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've found that MPlayer is more stable than XINE, and it plays video with a lot less CPU load. However, on one occasion, I had to use a XINElib based player (Totem) to play a really messed up WMV file that didn't seem to be properly encoded. Totem (XINElib) could play it, but MPlayer gave no video, even though they were using the same codecs from the same directory.

      MPlayer is my default player of choice, without the GUI (I prefer to use the arrowkeys for file navigation). It's associated in Nautilus to play all of my files. However, I keep Totem as my backup, though I've only had to use it once (in two years). I've found XINElib stuff to hard-lock my machine on multiple occasions, though in recent tests its been much more stable.

      One final thing about MPlayer. It, and its encoder, MEncoder, are great programs. You can have MPlayer send the output of an audi file to a raw PCM or WAV format, and convert it into OGG or MP3, so that you can play the files back in XMMS or something. I used it recently to convert some WMVs into OGG, for testing, and it sounded great. I couldn't notice any real difference between the files, and all of my Linux players could then handle the file.

    7. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by jimwatters · · Score: 1

      I can not find any mention of Quick Time VR compatibility. If it can not pan around a .mov VR file then it, or the others, are of no use. Jim

    8. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 1

      RealPlayer is evil. It messes with file asscociations in kde and gnome.

      Ogle is my player of choice for DVDs. It has very good menu support.

    9. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by alienhazard · · Score: 1

      am i the only one that thinks mplayer has the worst keyboard shortcuts and gui? for example, if i stretch a window or go fullscreen, it would only make sense that the video inside stretches too (but it doesnt). or why would they have '/' and '*' be the volume control? '+' and - make more sense to me... im not trollin, im just askin honest questions. maybe i just dont understand mplayer

      --
      > "I allege that SCO is full of it" -Linus
    10. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by damiam · · Score: 1
      if i stretch a window or go fullscreen, it would only make sense that the video inside stretches too (but it doesnt)

      If your video card has decent drivers (anything recent from nVidia or ATI works fine), mplayer will use the xv extension, which scales the video in hardware. Otherwise, you'll need to enable software scaling with the -zoom command-line option.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    11. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      The / and * keys are next to each other on the numpad, which make them quite easy to use for volume controls.

      --
      Luke-Jr
    12. Re:But how does it stand up to the comeptition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The really annoying thing is that you can't use it to pipe a raw stream. This would truly make mplayer the ultimate tool. The only problem I have ever had with it is that I wanted to encode to a format that wasn't supported for encoding. I wanted to use mplayer to pipe the raw stream to the encoder, but since error messages and other stuff comes out on stdout, it doesn't allow piping.

  15. Windows users: Media Player Classic by Zarhan · · Score: 4, Informative

    For Windows, I would suggest using Media Player Classic. It's made to look like the good, light and fast Media Player 6.4 but it includes support for all the new codecs (including an automatic search from the web if you feed it a video with uninstalled codec) and has a ton of nice features. The updates come rather regularly.

    I don't know about this new mplayer on Windows, but the 0.9 at least was very slow on my computer. On FreeBSD it works fine.

    1. Re:Windows users: Media Player Classic by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, this is the best media player I've found for Windows so far. A key feature in my opinion is its built-in SVCD support. Also, the built-in subtitle support isn't too bad either. It has replaced the following media players for me:

      - PowerDVD (I don't need any real powerful features to watch SVCD's which I'm sure MPC might still lack)
      - Windows Media Player
      - QuickTime
      - RealPlayer

      All in a sub-Megabyte package.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Windows users: Media Player Classic by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      By the way, this link goes to its SourceForge page where you can find a download and other goodies like forums and the bug tracker. I guess it's the temporary home page while guliverki reconstructs the main page at gabest.org.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Windows users: Media Player Classic by Zarhan · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I didn't know that it had been moved to sourceforge, that's why I just did the Google link (which provided a lot of places to download it, anyway).

    4. Re:Windows users: Media Player Classic by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Older versions of the standard Windows Media Player (default installs with the OS) had SVCD support, if I'm not mistaken. However, you had to direct it to the MPEG file on the CD. It was a roundabout method of playing VCDs and SVCDs, but it worked well (in my experience).

    5. Re:Windows users: Media Player Classic by Coneasfast · · Score: 1

      I don't know about this new mplayer on Windows, but the 0.9 at least was very slow on my computer. On FreeBSD it works fine.

      make sure you minimize the command prompt window, window has trouble updating the time status constantly (or disable it somehow) otherwise it will be very choppy.

      when i do this, divx movies are just barely playable (takes 90% of my celeron 733) in windows 98 SE

      --
      Marge, get me your address book, 4 beers, and my conversation hat.
    6. Re:Windows users: Media Player Classic by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      I second that recommendation. Before I switched all of my computers over to Linux (Redhat 9), I was using Media Player Classic. I never used it to play DVDs or VCDs... so I can't comment on that, but for every other video format, it was the best!

      Media Player Classic is so good that if you use Windows, but don't use Media Player Classic... YOU ARE MISSING OUT!

      Mplayer is the best thing there is for Linux, though.

    7. Re:Windows users: Media Player Classic by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What the fuck does this have to do with anything? Mod this down!

  16. Re:first post by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Funny

    This amazes me. I hadn't tried either of these for a year or more. Last week my girlfriend and I were surfing porn, and because she's so ignorant about these thing, she wanted to download some movies. They were WMPs, and I told her we probably couldn't play them, but that I'd try anyway. I tried mplayer first, because slashdot is always raving about it, and it handled the WMPs, so we went surfing for everything we could find -- I must've had six or more formats downloaded by the time we finished. I was amazed by mplayer, and Goy took me upstairs to practice what we had seen. Surfing porn makes her so horny
    Anyway, two days later, I decided to let Goy look at the files again. I was in the lab, and it has only xterms with no xv extension, so I tried all the movies with xine. It's a little painful with a 10Mb/s network card, but they all worked, just as mplayer did. Goy pulled my pants down and started on me right there.

    God Bless Mplayer and Xine!
    True story, not inflammatory rhetoric

  17. 1.0? by naitro · · Score: 1

    I tried this half an hour ago on my Powerbook 12". GCC exploded and segfaulted in a flood of error messages about some altivec-optimization. Guess I'll wait until 1.0-final :)

    1. Re:1.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No need to wait. You have to download Apple's latest gcc.

    2. Re:1.0? by beezly · · Score: 3, Informative

      GCC Segfaulted? Can you say "that's most-likely a GCC or hardware problem"?

    3. Re:1.0? by Valar · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. I've come across time when GCC has seg faulted on me, though it was for having a very large array statically allocated (think like an array of 20+ megs in structures sitting in an include file). While yes, gcc should display a friendly message to tell you you've broken something and then exit, the seg fault is more likely from something the code in question has done rather than gcc in general. Then again, if a program can't handle it's input...

    4. Re:1.0? by naitro · · Score: 1

      Cania : ~ > gcc --version|head -1 gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease) No OSX here :).

  18. hungary really has some bright folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    if you consider, that hungary is a very little country, with as little as 10 million inhabitants. guess how many of em are technocrats and freaks.

    then remember that it used to be behind the iron curtain and under communistic influence.

    and still, hungary gave the world quite a lot of bright and intelligent people and famous folks who changed the world we live in today....

    1. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      So does everywhere else.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      The people of Hungary are related to Finns. One piece of evidence is the similarities between our languages, which (together with Estonian) are very different from other European languages. And Finland only has some 5 million people, plus one penguin.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by Jonner · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to inform you that the Penguin has left the country.

      On a more serious note, I was sure you were making up the Hungary/Finnish relationship, until I found this.

    4. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the Hungarians, unlike any other nation on the planet, are a proud and independent people.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by newbiefan · · Score: 1

      "it used to be behind the iron curtain and under communistic influence."
      Life in front of the iron curtain is not that hot either...

    6. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for example, 3 of the 4 of the manhattan project, andy grove, and johnny van neuman.

    7. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that black people can't do particle physics? You are a racist, sir, a racist.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Britain.

    9. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      You're right!

      Better tell that to the students at Cambridge, Oxford, UCL, LSE etc etc etc. They'll be crushed.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:hungary really has some bright folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for the record:
      Teller, Ede
      Wiegner, Jeno
      Szilard, Leo

  19. Windows players... by xybe · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you want to see some windows-users' jaws drop, wait until one of them complains he cannot see some movie or the subtitles and show them one of the jukebox-on-a-CD linux distributions based on mplayer.

    They boot, they play. No installing, no fuzz.

    They can play anything mplayer 9x Can.

    1. Re:Windows players... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      uhm ... what if you only have a single dvd-drive in your computer and nothing else? Can they run just fine without the "jukebox-cd" in the drive?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:Windows players... by xybe · · Score: 1

      Geexbox can, it requires only 4Mb of diskspace so you copy your movies/music to a folder(1) and run a batch file(2) and end up with an iso image you can burn with Nero(3) or something like that. Linux tranlation: 1-directory | 2-Bash script | (3) k3b/xcdroast/cdrecord in decreasing geekness.

    3. Re:Windows players... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never been able to watch a movie or see subtitles on a movie using media player in windows

      The only thing these projects prove is that the kernel scheduler needs a lot of work if applications like these have popped up that have to boot into their own environment to watch movies without stuttering and the like.

      I mean seriously, why should someone have to use what basically amounts to a bootdisk to watch a movie or listen to music? That's just ridiculous.

    4. Re:Windows players... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Well, that's fine and dandy, but I was thinking more in the lines of trying it with my dvd's ...

      last I checked I didn't have access to a dvd-burner, and it seems VERY overkill to rip your movies, then burn them to another media just to watch them. Not to mention a huge waste of media...

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    5. Re:Windows players... by xybe · · Score: 1

      If you burn no media into the images, the drive ejects after boot, everything is loaded into memory. Yes, you could argue that you need a machine with at least 64Mb of RAM, but as long as you have that in a machine with a DVD it can boot from, you can use GeexBox. In Fact Movix is too big to fit with other media on a CD so it expects that you will eject the disc and put something into it.

    6. Re:Windows players... by smg_mrBlonde · · Score: 0

      It seems there is some confusion, as long as the media player recognizes the format, all you need are the codecs. And there is no lack of media players for windows.
      I use the already mentioned, Zoom Player with ffdshow codecs for video and ac3 filter for audio.
      I have seen all movies i have downloaded until now, with no problems.

  20. Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media player by Plug · · Score: 5, Informative

    You know the simultaneous best and worst thing about GNU/Linux/OSS etc is there is always another option...

    There was a new beta of Totem released yesterday too - it's a GNOME 2 media player based on Xine (it doesn't attempt to reinvent the wheel). The author is also working on a Gstreamer back end for it.

    Why do I like it? A quote on their webpage sums it up: "Totem is the only media player I've seen that doesn't attempt to have skins or look like a reject from a 1971 Kenwood catalog." For those of us who like Windows Media Player (pre 8) for its clean and consistent interface and were annoying that Linux doesn't have anything like it, Totem's your project.

    Mplayer does some files better than Totem, but if you want to do more than "mplayer This.divx", check it out.

    (standard "I have nothing to do with this project other than thinking it's really cool" disclaimer)

    Throwaway Question that will Undoubtedly Get Dozens of Answers while the Rest of the Post Goes Unread: Why doesn't Mplayer disable XScreensaver while playing?)

  21. Finally by t0qer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I can watch my pron on any system.

    (Ya mod's, hate me cause i'm a perve!)

  22. Re:Wow! Windows support! by Microlith · · Score: 1

    Nope. While you don't have to compile Mingw or Cygwin, you do have to compile mplayer.

    You forget they're the group that vehemently disavows any binary distribution.

    So to use mplayer on windows you have to maintain Mingw, Cygwin, and possibly GTK+ as well.

    Thus there's zero incentive to use it.

  23. Funny... by soccerisgod · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...when I submitted a story a couple months ago about how mplayer now has windows support nobody seemed interested. It's not like this is a new feature of the 1.x version...

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    1. Re:Funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows users are pretty happy with what they got. Winamp, CyberDVD, whatever what have you.

    2. Re:Funny... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      The point here is that it is free, free as in "accessable" to use it and as in free as in $$$.

      CyberDVD and others all costs money. Yes, you can crack it but some people don't want to.

      Winamp is free ... now. Maybe it will be forever but with OpenSource you can do a whole lot more with the program/code.

      Maybe it comes down to this: If the free/small-fee programs are fine with you, great. But at least OpenSource does give you the choice. And choice it good.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:Funny... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

      Have you tried changing your username to something like soccertaco or something like that?

    4. Re:Funny... by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      No, but I was thinking of soccermom.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  24. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I know exactly what you mean. Sascha (my goat) and I were surfing pr0n last month and we found a link to a clip in .FLI format (remember that one? gawd damn). Anyway there was nothing on Windoze that could read it so I gave mplayer a shot, and damn! but if it didn't play it off perfectly. Sascha was pretty lubricated at this point and she started tugging at her leash, that usually means she wants to head out to the barn for some action. So we did. mplayer rules this fucking world.

  25. Re:Wow! Windows support! by Whelkman · · Score: 1

    You forget they're the group that vehemently disavows any binary distribution.

    You forget this issue was settled a while ago.

  26. Oh the humanity... by asb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many hours did you waste while you wrote yet another skinned user interface? How many hours did you waste with Gimp while you made all those nifty default skins? How many hours of everyone elses time do you waste when people despreately install new skins in order to find the one that is even remotely usable?

    GUI widget sets are there to make it easy for programmers and designers to make user interfaces that are consistent and easy to learn. By implementing your very own eye candy skin framework you undermine all the hard work made by all those smart people.

    This is not a troll. Go read a book or two about user interface design.

    --
    Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    1. Re:Oh the humanity... by azzy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I spent about 2-3 hours making a skin for mplayer that I find to be perfect for my needs. I wish I could use it for windows media player (when I'm on windows) but I can't. Thank god for mplayer skins! It lets me customise mplayer to be how /I/ want it. Isn't that the point?
      I don't know anyone else who uses or likes it,and frankly I'm not much bothered, but I did make it available here as I thought sharing it was the least I could do.

    2. Re:Oh the humanity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to reiterate the original posters point.

      Go read a book or two about user interface design. Please.

    3. Re:Oh the humanity... by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      How often have we chastized someone who wasted their time doing something they prolly aren't making money off of. Sure, they could be doing something "better" with your dime if you were paying them :)

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    4. Re:Oh the humanity... by azzy · · Score: 0

      No. I'd like to reiterate my point, that my mplayer skin perfectly meets my needs.

    5. Re:Oh the humanity... by Azghoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "waste" is a pretty harsh way of looking at someone getting some practice using GIMP, isn't it? Call it, "practicing graphic arts skills" or something and it doesn't sound so bad.

      Maybe an interface for YOU doesn't make sense as an interface for ME. The nice thing about skins is YOU don't have to use MINE.

    6. Re:Oh the humanity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "waste" is a pretty harsh way of looking at someone getting some practice using GIMP, isn't it?

      You can practice GIMP not only designing skins, but retouching photos or whatever..

      Plus when he said "waste" he meant re-inventing the wheel (skin system) when it's been implemented many times and works (QT, GTK, most modern toolkits...)

    7. Re:Oh the humanity... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
      Some people don't think you should have a choice. Logically one would think those people would go away and use Windows, but they're still here. I think they're a secret Microsoft plot.

      By the way, if you really want to see a user stumble, try remapping your keyboard slightly with xmodmap. It can make for hours (well... minutes) of fun!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    8. Re:Oh the humanity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "nice" thing about application-specific skins are that they break what little consistency I can muster on a unix desktop. The widget sets are there for a reason, and the reason is not only saving programmer effort but also providing the user with a consistent and compatible environment. Besides, the modern widget sets have their own skin systems if you cannot bear to look at the simple default decorations.

    9. Re:Oh the humanity... by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      That's actually a pretty cool skin. I don't normally use MPlayer skins, but I'm going to give this one a shot. Thanks!

    10. Re:Oh the humanity... by azzy · · Score: 1

      Well if you like it, I'll check tonight if my local copy has updates not on freshmeat, and I'll update it if that's the case. So peek again in a day or so to see if there's an updated version. Note also that my skin supports the mplayer fullscreen pop-up control widget on the bottom edge, I forget what mplayer calls this.

    11. Re:Oh the humanity... by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Yes, and how dare anyone have any extraneous fun with their system. We must all conform to the UI guidelines that someone else has given us!

      Come on! There's nothing that says you have to use skins, or even the apps that have skins! But if you like them, or like programs that use them, or appreciate in the slightest the imagination that someone put into coming up with some new skin... give 'em a break.

      "consistent and compatible environment" might be what you're looking for, but who are you to say what I should us on my desktop?

    12. Re:Oh the humanity... by Replicant7 · · Score: 1

      Please post the URL of your skin to the mplayer-dev-eng mailing list and we will include your skin in CVS.

    13. Re:Oh the humanity... by Replicant7 · · Score: 1

      It is called playbar.

    14. Re:Oh the humanity... by azzy · · Score: 1

      YES!!!!!!! thanks :)

    15. Re:Oh the humanity... by E-prospero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Its not that you shouldn't have a choice. It's that the choice isn't worth having in the first place.

      MPlayer uses Yet Another Widget Toolkit, custom built for MPlayer, and used by exactly 1 application - mplayer. There is no reuse of this toolkit between other applications.

      I might be able to accept this lack of reuse if there was a genuine reason for it - if mplayer had some unique UI requirements - but can you name one single feature that Mplayer's widget toolkit provides that isn't available in the GTK+/Gnome widget toolkit, or could be added to that toolkit with minimal effort, adding a feature that could be used by other developers?

      GTK+ is themeable - if you want all your buttons to look like they are covered in yak vomit - you can do that.

      If you use Glade right, you can customize the layout of your user interface, reorganising the layout of your control buttons.

      GTK+ provides every manner of widget, control, and display, and can be easily extended to provide additional controls and displays.

      So - all the mplayer team has succeeded in doing is spending a whole lot of effort duplicating features that are available elsewhere. Then they have to support this code - find and fix bugs, answer questions about how to write extensions/themes, document the whole thing...

      And before you say "Oh, but you could make a GTK+ theme for Mplayer" - yes, I could. But that would mean YET MORE development effort, and a constant struggle to make not just the look, but the FEEL consistent with the rest of my desktop. This means that not only do buttons look right (including being the right size and shape), but they behave the same way to mouse clicks, keyboard shortcuts, mouseovers. Emulation of this kind of behaviour is VERY rarely done well. A lot easier to just use the right tool to begin with.

      Although the comparison I give here is GTK+/Gnome centric, but I believe similar facilities exist in KDE as well.

      Yes - every developer has the right to choose their own toolkit, and choose to implement their own if they wish. It just seems that every single multimedia application developer (mplayer, xine, xmms...) seems to think that they know how to make widget toolkits better than everybody else... particularly ironic given that they seem to suck at building them so badly. I can't think of a single "themeable UI" application that doesn't have major usability issues that frustrate the jeebies out of me every time I'm forced to use it.

      Russ %-)

      --
      ... and never, ever play leapfrog with a unicorn.
    16. Re:Oh the humanity... by asb · · Score: 1

      So that was 2-3 hours of your time wasted. Does anybody else want to add to the list? ;-)

      Thank god gxine has a GTK user interface that looks and works like all the other GTK applications I use! The buttons look like buttons, File- and View-menus contain exactly the menu items you expect. Isn't that the point?

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
  27. Gets better and better by d0sai · · Score: 0, Funny

    OMG - Mplayer just gets better and better, It already rocked - Now the mplayer team is doing somethin more. I hereby banish WMP to HELL

  28. Re:Yup, this will excite windows lusers by Whelkman · · Score: 1

    In terms of playing various movie types, mplayer does twice as much as Windows Media Player.

  29. Windows already has an all in one media player by jkeyes · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is called Media Player Classic. It's hosted on sourceforge and is open source! It also conviently doesn't include Quicktime or Real codec's but a quick search on google for Quicktime Alternative and Real Alternative gives you those codecs! It can play everything provided you have the proper codec installed including DVDs so everyone on windows enjoy. Appropriate links follow below:

    Media Player Classic

    Real Alternative

    Quicktime Alternative

    1. Re:Windows already has an all in one media player by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      I have been a big supporter of Media Player Classic on Windows. Whenever I see people make a big deal out of how Mplayer can play every media format... I point out that MPC has been doing that for months now... doing it better than Mplayer.

      If I was still using Windows, I would be using MPC. I don't know why a Windows user wouldn't use it.

      However, I had data loss issues with Windows, so I use Linux and Mplayer now. Mplayer is almost just as good as MPC.

    2. Re:Windows already has an all in one media player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it play .bin images too ?

    3. Re:Windows already has an all in one media player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a troll, you idiot moderators, it's the truth. All MPC does is plug in to Microsoft's DirectShow control. There's nothing special about it.

    4. Re:Windows already has an all in one media player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. DirectShow means a small set of filters and it lacks many useful one. Just look at the built-in filter list, those are all missing or suck on your vanilla Windows installation.

  30. Re:first post by zarniwhoop · · Score: 1

    I dont beleive you!

    I mean - being able to read ALL those formats - gettoutahere!!

    As for Girlfriend - can you tell me where I can download one - preferbaly a RPM?

  31. Any advance on VLC? by nicky_d · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For OS X, I spent an age trying to get various codecs working in Quicktime to view variously encoded episodes of Curb Your Enthusiasm which probably won't be aired in the UK before 2005. The recent Mac DivX codecs solved a lot of these, but I didn't like the fact that they came in an installer package - I try to stick to drag-installs on the Mac so I know what's where. Then I gave VLC (http://www.videolan.org/) a try, and in OS X at least, it works like a charm. I haven't found anything it won't run yet, it plays DVDs without any region checking (provided your firmware is fixed), and it handles VCDs to boot. It really does do everything I need it to in a proper one-app drag install, and it's GPL. Definitly worth a look for Apple users - which isn't to say Mplayer isn't worthy, too.

    1. Re:Any advance on VLC? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Why not just buy the DVDs? The maker of 'Curb your Enthusiasm' are clearly making something that you value.

      Why is theft acceptable these days?

      VLC is compromised in many areas, though it has its uses.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Any advance on VLC? by CashCarSTAR · · Score: 1

      Because the DVDs would not be encoded in his particular region code and importing them would be a violation of copyright as well.

      Duh.

    3. Re:Any advance on VLC? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Are you sure the movie companies agree with that? I seem to remember Fox UK recommending that UK customers bought R1 Simpsons boxed sets not that long ago...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:Any advance on VLC? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1
      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Any advance on VLC? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      How can importing be a violation of copyright? You're not copying them!

      Multiregion is perfectly legal, despite what the movie companies would have you believe (in fact over here only a complete clutz would but a single-region player... even the cheap supermarket brands are multiregion).

      I get most of my stuff from play.com imported from the US.. you can get a an even cheaper deal if you import from australia (although there's less choice) although I forget the URL.

    6. Re:Any advance on VLC? by nicky_d · · Score: 1

      Why not just buy the DVDs? The maker of 'Curb your Enthusiasm' are clearly making something that you value.

      Yes, they are, and I would buy them like a shot if they were available. Similarly, I wouldn't need to watch them on my PC if they were shown in the UK, but over here we've only had the first season, shown at a time that was hardly likely to attract much attention and support for subsequent airings. I may or may not be stealing, depending on your viewpoint, but I'm definitely not out to deprive the makers of any revenue; I'll pay for the overpriced Special Edition 3-disc DVD set any time they like. In the meantime, if it helps, try to consider my actions as a compliment to the makers; I'll risk my very liberty to view their work!

    7. Re:Any advance on VLC? by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      "importing them would be a violation of copyright"

      What drugs are you on? The only ones violating laws and treaties in cases of zone locks are the cartels that don't give a damn what the laws are if it gets in the way of profit maximization. I buy DVD's through Amazon.uk, Amazon.ca, Amazon.de or whatever to get the titles I want to pay to see. My drive has been flashed to be region free and it all works fine.

    8. Re:Any advance on VLC? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Importing a non-local region DVD is not a violation of copyright. The region system is to provide a mechanism that makes exclusive-to-region distribution contracts more valuable. Once you buy an authorized copy of copyrighted content, you have the absolute right to take it whereever you want.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:Any advance on VLC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about theft? He's talking about copyright infringement.

    10. Re:Any advance on VLC? by CashCarSTAR · · Score: 1

      To respond to all, it was somewhat sarcastic. As well, I was referring to the "license" agreement that the media makers want to put on what you have that limits it.

      Apparently there is good reasons for this, as a sort of CYA technique, for outside licensing.

      In my mind the world is too mad licensing wise.

    11. Re:Any advance on VLC? by global_diffusion · · Score: 1

      For OS X, I spent an age trying to get various codecs working in Quicktime

      Word. Not being able to watch three-quarters of my movies has been a definite annoyance for me since I got a powerbook. The lack of a truly good media player for os x has been the major setback for me and has had me debating whether to wipe x and go back to linux. Now that mplayer is out for osx I think I'm set. Now if only I could get snd to run on osx....

  32. Mplayer in Windows by Dr.Karnage · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've downloaded a couple of monts ago a windows binary of mplayer. It didn't played any divx I threw at it... It just kept "saying your machine is too slow to play this file". I agree with jkeyes and Zarhan: the best way to watch movies in Windows is through the mighty Media Payer Classic.

    1. Re:Mplayer in Windows by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Yeh that annoys me. Just drop frames or something - I don't need to be "told off" by my software.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:Mplayer in Windows by unperson · · Score: 1


      Yeh that annoys me. Just drop frames or something...


      There is exactly such a command that can be fed to mplayer on the command line:

      > mplayer -framedrop file.mpg

    3. Re:Mplayer in Windows by damiam · · Score: 1

      The mplayer Windows port was infantile a few months ago. I suggest you try it again. If it still bitches at you, then please file a bug report - that's how this sort of thing gets fixed.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  33. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    As for Girlfriend - can you tell me where I can download one - preferbaly a RPM?

    Idno about the RPM,

    but you could try searching google for ".DEB does dallas"

  34. Re:first post by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep your Xine....

    Mplayer is built right. A command line player and a GUI that is seperate.

    That way mplayer can be used as a part of a larger project... freevo ring a bell?

    It blows my mind how many projects for linux are rendered useless for many uses simply because the programmers think that the GUI MUST be a part of the app...

    It doesn't and makes your program less useful.

    mplayer is the best player out for linux. Until you can seperate the gui out of Xine easily at compile time... Xine cant even compete....

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  35. Re:Yup, this will excite windows lusers by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, mplayer does fuck all. The codecs - if you install them, which presupposes that you know what a codec is - do as much as you can do with Windows Media Player.

    Is there really so much confusion over this issue? Joe Windows is a cretin. He doesn't use the auto update feature built in to the OS. What chance has he got of figuring out that the reason he can't watch BangBus #42 is because he needs to download RalphVideo 3.21 and BobsAudio 0.0.3.2.1?

    Once again we're confusing two issues. I use and like mplayer, and I'm glad to see a new version. But there's nothing here for Joe Windows, and I'm calling bullshit on the article body.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  36. Legal issues by lina_inverse · · Score: 5, Funny

    In all fairness, calling it MPlayer probably wasn't the greatest idea. They might as well have called it "Real Quick MPlayer", just to annoy everyone else.

    1. Re:Legal issues by Jonner · · Score: 1

      No, it's not a great name, but it's more generic than a rip-off. It just stands for "Movie Player." Xine is more original, but I'm never sure how to pronounce it (Zine?, X-I-N-E?).

    2. Re:Legal issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, did someone else use the name "MPlayer" before them?

  37. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by evilviper · · Score: 1
    "Totem is the only media player I've seen that doesn't attempt to have skins or look like a reject from a 1971 Kenwood catalog."

    Simple solution... Use mplayer. No GUI needed. Works great, and it's very easy once you learn a couple keyboard controls.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  38. Using this one too.... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Apart from a buggy internal mpeg1 decoder in the last build (6.4.6.0), it's been working perfectly. Just disable that though and it'll return to whatever codec you have installed. It plays anything I've been able to throw at it apart from one mysterious .wmv file it *should* have been able to play. Let the rest of the world skin their player, I'll take MPC and play the vid in full screen instead.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Using this one too.... by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

      There's a new build which "includes a new mpeg audio decoder."

      Might help.

      I had an aversion to the old MS WMP look, and was surprised when it actually worked. I'll add that the whole package is only 800k.

    2. Re:Using this one too.... by Captain+Segfault · · Score: 1

      Let the rest of the world skin their player

      Except for the CLI mplayer people.

  39. Re:Yup, this will excite windows lusers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about "Joe Windows"? Let him use windows media player for fuck's sake.

    Me, on the other hand, I'll use mplayer in Linux and FreeBSD and I'll be happy about it because it works like a charm and I'm not too stupid to get it working.

  40. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mplayer does some files better than Totem, but if you want to do more than "mplayer This.divx", check it out.

    Ah, but you forget about MPlayer G2, which will be stripped of all front-end nonsense and instead implement all kinds of hooks that will allow people to built however vast frontends for it.

    Why doesn't Mplayer disable XScreensaver while playing?)

    For the same reason it doesn't disable, I don't know, PINE or Mozilla. XScreensaver is just an application that happens to be running at the same time, not a standard in power saving. MPlayer does, however, disable DPMS monitor power saving which is what you should be using if you really want power saving instead of fancy pictures showed when nobody's looking anyway.

    --
    i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  41. Re:Yup, this will excite windows lusers by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    you aced it

    discussion over

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  42. Gosh another mplayer announcement by rjw57 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    *puts on troll mask* erm... yeah... err... mplayer it like does the same stuff as xine but xine is better! yeah...

    oh. damn.

    *checks previous /. posts on xine/mplayer for the correct troll comments... watch this space*

    --
    Rich
    1. Re:Gosh another mplayer announcement by cbcbcb · · Score: 1

      mplayer doesn't have a crap splash screen, so mplayer is better :)

  43. Re:first post by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
    you could just switch to a better desktop


    Let me think about that for a sec. Ummmmm.... No.
    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  44. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by MrLizardo · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the reminder. I haven't checked out totem in a while since I reinstalled my system after a harddrive crash. I remember liking it but I also remember it freezing at random times and refusing to play several of the files that mplayer played no problem. Also, the fact that at that time mplayer played quicktime sorenson 3 and totem didn't was a real killer. But I'm heading over to the totem page right now to retrieve the latest source. About the screensaver thing, I'm not quite sure but I think mplayer does disable the screensaver, i just don't remember if it does it by default...Ok, found the option: Try mplayer -stop_xscreensaver movie.mov for all your screensaver free movie watching pleasure.

    -AX

    --
    ^I'm with stupid.^
  45. MPlayer DOES do it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have to hand it to these guys. I've tried all the other gpl'd players and they don't come close to mplayer. It just works. Sound is good, video is good. The only thing I haven't got it doing is oggs and I think thats just cause I haven't compiled it in (playing wma's on it is good tho!). It is certainly one of the more interesting ones to compile from souce because of the libraries etc.. but once you get past that hey it's all good.

    Sure the interface needs some work, like a dockable playlist etc... but man... I'm still blown away... I think I need to sit down... I'm getting hot flashes just thinking about mplayer v1.0 :)

    1. Re:MPlayer DOES do it all by BlueLightning · · Score: 1

      No, it does not. It doesn't do DVD navigation - for me, that is enough to stop me from using it.

  46. Re:Yup, this will excite windows lusers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perhaps it's worth mentioning that Windows Media Player does not download divx? Perhaps it's also worth mentioning that "Joe Windows" somehow always manages to get hold of the divx codec anyway?

    All the codecs are available for download off the mplayer site, along with the program itself. There's no problem here.

  47. Converting QuickTime and RealMedia to MPEG4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Don't forget that mplayer/mencoder allow you to rip your DVDs and compress them with DivX or XviD.

    Another fantastic feature is that with mencoder you can convert crap closed formats such as QuickTime (yes, with the Sorensen codec) and RealMedia into a standard MPEG4 format like XviD.

  48. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, sorry. The correct way to do it would be to build a complete framework using proper design and little things like shared libraries, object models and a decent IPC interface. That would allow you to properly use the code in other applications, without having to mess about trying to invoke and control an interactive command line application from another application. You can easily write a whole bunch of front-ends that all use the exact same backend, and the backend can be easily extended with plugins without breaking all those front-ends.

    The only project I can think of that comes close on Linux is GStreamer, but its not widely used.

    No doubt there will be several people now who want to tell me why a command line player only is better and why we now need Yet Another Media Player for Linux (How many do we have now, and how many of them still implement their own Sound Daemon?)

  49. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You do know that xine simply ripped off all the work done by the mplayer people and just wrote a GUI on top of it, don't you?

    A GUI that does not work, crashes and just gets in the way. I'd rather use mplayer the way it was meant to be used: on a command line.

    Do you even know that with mplayer comes a fully featured command line encoder that can cross-encode between any supported codec? You'd like to rip a DVD into a XviD or (god forbid) RealMedia? That takes one command line. No hassle with goddamn buttons, menus and dialogs.

  50. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thats not the simple solution, thats the "crap" solution. Thats like telling someone to use TWM because they found KDE 3 a little flashy for their tastes.

  51. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    from man mplayer

    -stop_xscreensaver

    Turns off xscreensaver at startup and turns it on again on exit.

  52. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Domini · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And how do I use it then if I have a media machine with an IR mouse? For a home entertainment system this will not work.

    (See MoviX^2 for the functionality that I require...)

  53. Why so much attrition against Windoze users? by MBMarduk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I sense a LOT of 1337ist attitudes (grudges?) against the idea of using Mplayer on Win32.
    Why? What's with that?
    What ever happened to the ideal of free software for everyone INCLUDING convincing the unwashed Windoze masses of the superiority of FOSS?

    1. Re:Why so much attrition against Windoze users? by caluml · · Score: 1

      Because if all the cool OSS stuff runs on Windows, there'll be nothing to convince people to use Linux. I'm all for a killer app that only runs on Linux, which drags people away from the anaethesitising soporific tedium that is Windows.

    2. Re:Why so much attrition against Windoze users? by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Because if all the cool OSS stuff runs on Windows, there'll be nothing to convince people to use Linux.

      Ah, so you want to force people into running Linux by depriving them of actually working open source software? What do you care what operating system people run? Mind your own business.

      And if you're so bent on having people move from Windows to Linux, why don't you concentrate on making Linux as easy to use and as comfortable as Windows is these days and the public adopt it - even without any dubious "in order to use our software, you'll have to use our operating system" bundling.

    3. Re:Why so much attrition against Windoze users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT works the other way around!
      When people switch to Linux, and they see the apps they are used to they are *gasp* happy.

      It works for Gaim, OpenOffice and Firebird. I know people who have switched for this excact reason.

    4. Re:Why so much attrition against Windoze users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, whole people? How about enterprise level orgs..and a lot of them please. You can't possibly think the "people" you've seen switch makes any difference.

    5. Re:Why so much attrition against Windoze users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can D3d racing simulations such as a full blown Nascar sim run in 4x FSAA, 16x AA, using a Radeon 9500 in Linux? So far, no. Therefore, no reason to make Linux my primary OS. But, it is nice to have a Samba PDC. :)

    6. Re:Why so much attrition against Windoze users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for a killer app that only runs on Linux, which drags people away from the anaethesitising soporific tedium that is Windows.

      How about a killer OS that's easy enough for my grandparents to use? Forget yet another killer app, compete with Windows by making an OS that doesn't require a computer science degree to keep running.

      No user wants "anaethesitising soporific tedium". They just want an OS that is easy to use. Make a linux that's as easy to use as Windows. Then concentrate on the killer app.

    7. Re:Why so much attrition against Windoze users? by Hurga · · Score: 1
      Ah, so you want to force people into running Linux by depriving them of actually working open source software?

      Sure, why not. The longer they use Windows, the longer Windows' interoperability shortcomings are getting on my nerves.

      Besides, this guy explains it better than I could do:
      • http://www.fefe.de/nowindows/

      Hanno
    8. Re:Why so much attrition against Windoze users? by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      I'd much prefer a killer app that's simply open source, but runs in both Windows and Linux. Why? Nobody's going to switch to Linux because of one app; they probably won't even know it exists. But if the apps they use are all available for Linux (the exact same software, not just something that does the same thing), then it's much easier for them to switch.

      Consider office software. Suppose someone wants to switch to Linux, but uses Microsoft Office. They ask me, "does Linux have that?" to which I must reply; "it's possible but difficult to run Office in Linux. You could try OpenOffice, though." But if they already use OpenOffice, I can just say "Yes," and the switch is that much easier. If Windows users use open source apps, than from their perspective, the switch to an open source OS means little more than getting a new window manager.

  54. Great news by Gwala · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Mplayer software is absolutely brilliant, when running using the VESA driver (under bash), I managed to get my old Cel 500mhz laptop to play Dual-pass XVid at 30fps, without a problem. Plus the steady and all-in-one approach to drivers is a solution to the horrible driver mess that forms on any windows machine.

    -Gwala

    --
    #!/bin/csh cat $0
    1. Re:Great news by Dr.Karnage · · Score: 2, Informative

      Driver mess in Windows? Use ffdshow (http://ffdshow.sourceforge.net). Even if you want to use the latest DivX or XviD to watch your movies, you can tell ffdshow to let the codecs play them. In conjunction with Media Player Classic, it's perfect for any Windows machine.

    2. Re:Great news by Gwala · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I downloaded it the other day, however it still is missing some Audio codecs, but still remains a giant leap ahead of (expletive) Nimo, etc.

      -Gwala

      --
      #!/bin/csh cat $0
  55. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you were to read the manpage you'd see there is an option for turning off xscreensaver, too.

  56. Re:first post by Telex4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm confused... help me out here.

    I installed xine-lib, and gxine, and kmplayer. I haven't installed xine-ui.

    I have Xine installed.... without the Xine gui.

    I have two different frontends to Xine.

    So why do you say:
    Until you can seperate the gui out of Xine easily at compile time... Xine cant even compete....

    And how do you get moderated up for it?
    By the way, I prefer mplayer :)

  57. Re:Yup, this will excite windows lusers by Gwala · · Score: 1

    God yeah, the MCSE immedietely entitles idiots to spout their opinions from their unqualified (in the "real world") rear-end.

    I have had 2 Induhviduals (who both work for the same entity) tell me on seperate occasions, that "A Network with equal rights and responsibilities between all clients [eg. refereneced was Gnutella]" Is actually a client/server situation, and not a peer to peer network. The other genius remarks include "Every network MUST have a Windows Domain, NO exceptions".

    I really do wonder if most people were just born stupid, or if they were raised that way.

    -Gwala

    --
    #!/bin/csh cat $0
  58. or VLC by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    There is also VLC, which is open source and very complete.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  59. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    okay ENOUGH!

    how many god damn browsers, players, desktops, editors do we need?
    I'm tired of seeing all this wasted talent just so GNOME or KDE can have thier own everything. swallow your damn pride and work together for crying out loud. True everyone has thier own tastes well here is a fucking revelation, code the fucking thing to be customizable. I understand why gnome was started and that makes sence but think of how good "knome" would be by now if there was only one.

    You know what i'm an advocate of? I want to see a 'stability' year.. where EVERYONE freezes the fucking features and spends a complete year stabalizing, polishing thier work. Since OSS developers in alot of cases have no boss, they tend to want to move on to the next 'fun' feature.

    well thats enough time spent on something you 'free thinkers' will just mod down as flamebait or offtopic.. keep dumping your heads in the sand that will make all the problems go away.

  60. throwing by s3ti · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why does everybody use the phrase 'it plays everything I have thrown at it' in the MPlayer context? It's not like there are no other ways of saying this...

  61. Site still operational? by WernerStormcrow · · Score: 2, Funny
    The top headline of slashdot features a mighty new version of a popular Open Source project and I can still download it at 500 kB/s???

    HELLO!!! I thought this was slashdot!

    ...wait a sec, what am I complaining about?

    1. Re:Site still operational? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apache/1.3.26 (Unix) Debian GNU/Linux.
      that's why ;)

  62. Re:first post by Jonner · · Score: 3, Funny

    You had to think about it for a second? Just what kind of raving KDE/OSX/Windoze/IceWM/Enlightenment/GNUStep fanatic are you?

  63. Quicktime != MPlayer, Real, WMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Lumping QuickTime in with WMP and Real is pretty unfair. Where Quicktime provides a complete and sophisticated architecture for media manipulation as well as a completely open API that shows no platform preference across the desktop platforms (and the servier is available for nearly everything), Real and WMP use proprietary formats and are nothing but players with some very poorly designed and implemented media collection management tools. MPlayer is just another player, it is not in the same class of product as Quicktime.

    1. Re:Quicktime != MPlayer, Real, WMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
      Real and WMP use proprietary formats

      The Sorensen codec is on line one.

    2. Re:Quicktime != MPlayer, Real, WMP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also really sophisticated of Apple to make you pay (windows, not mplayer, version) in order to play movies in fullscreen :-)

  64. Replace your Real and Quicktime Codecs. by Cabeiroi · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you go to:

    http://www.freecodecs.com/

    you'll find a few programs called Real Alternative and Quicktime Alternative. It has everything you need to replace your Real and Quicktime codecs plus it comes with a fairly recent version of Media Player Classic.

    I tried it out and found that it worked and seeked better than RealPlayer.

  65. mingw port rules! by Comsn · · Score: 2, Informative

    anyone that wants to see the greatness of mplayer on windows, check out http://www.mplayerhq.hu/MPlayer/releases/win32-bet a/ and grab the mingw32-dev-CVS-... package. you can even add the realplayer and quicktime codecs from the download page and have real/quicktime working without having to install the horrible realplayer/quicktime players.

  66. mplayer no longer accepts lists of files by suso · · Score: 1, Informative

    I don't know whether this was something intentional (i've been trying to find out) but somewhere in the last couple of minor releases I have no longer been able to play a group of files by doing 'mplayer *' on the command line. I have to make a playlist file and then play them.

  67. Encoding (mencoder) by dusty123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While mplayer is an excellent piece of software for decoding video, mencoder (Encoding software) has a lot of bugs and limitations.

    Simple things, like concatenating 2 .mpg-Files fail, rebuilding indices also fail from time to time.

    Hopefully also the encoding part (also the documentation including examples) will improve.

    1. Re:Encoding (mencoder) by pantherace · · Score: 2, Informative
      Have you filed bug reports (on the index)? catting 2 mpegs is not supported officially, but it sometimes works, if and only if all the setttings are the same in both. (not to mention that atm I would not suggest using mplayers mpeg output container as opposed to avi output container (the default).)

      They can't fix what they can't see.

    2. Re:Encoding (mencoder) by Jameth · · Score: 1

      Wow!

      You can actually sit there and say that MEncoder is bad. Sure, it isn't the simplest interface, and doesn't make some tasks easy, but it does encode high quality almost every time, encodes plenty fast, and can encode with about every option you could want. It could do with a good frontend and a few nifty features, but it's pretty damn good in general.

    3. Re:Encoding (mencoder) by dnaumov · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've only recently (a few weeks ago) got into DVD-ripping under *NIX (using FreeBSD) and I found mencoder to be the most intuitive cli tool to use. Just thinking about trying to remember all cli switches to transcode makes my head hurt.

      Mencoder with libavcodec/ffmpeg provide good quality video encoding at decent speed. I am using the following -lavcopts to archieve the best results:

      "vcodec=mpeg4:vhq:v4mv:trell:precmp=258:cmp=258:su bcmp=258:vmax_b_frames=1"

      Make sure you pick a good video bitrate and rip the audio at good quality. Personally, I suggest 192 kbps CBR MP3 to prevent any kind of compatibility issues.

  68. Re:first post by _tom451_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's another good KDE/QT player: Kaffeine http://members.chello.at/kaffeine/ is a Xine based player

  69. Hungarian Language (was Re:hungary really has...) by orcrist · · Score: 1

    Nice link. Here's one with a bit more overview: The keyword here is 'finno-ugric', which is the name of the language family to which Hungarian and Finnish (and a lot of other languages) belong.

    The parent of this thread was mistaken about the peoples since there is no evidence that the Hungarian and Finnish peoples are related, just the languages; in fact the modern day Hungarians do not seem to be descended from any one distinct ethnicity. I'm too lazy too find links, but I'm sure the more industrious and curious among you can find something on the web.

    -Chris

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  70. Let me get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You just confused kplayer with klayer.

    And Gnome uses Gplayer.

    On the Mac however McPlayer rules,
    but on Windows there is MsPlayer 2000.

    If you have IceWM installed you must use
    IcePlayer, but not iplayer which works only with
    iPods.

    Suse supports only the splayer and the MensaPlayer (for people with IQ > 120).

    RedHat has additionally redplayer, which is also used by RedFlag Linux but called MaoPlayer there.

    Debian has player.deb which is only textmode, with stop and play buttons reversed and was created in the year 1911.

    FreeBSD and NetBSD have no player but ports for all other players. However, these ports will try to download 50 Gbyte from non-existing URLs and then crash with some compiler errors.

    OpenBSD has an own secure player called OpenPlayer which is so secure that it will refuse to load any songs, won't accept any users commands and the binary will not be excutable.

    Solaris has no player, but they accounced that they will port Gplayer soon.

    And finally UnixWare has no player, too, but SCO claims that everybody is using their player because they where all based on cat hello.wav >/dev/snd.

  71. Let's rephrase that a bit... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 1
    perhaps it's the one application to finally tell the **AA where the world wants to go today!

    I think it's more a matter of telling the **AA where they can shove it.

  72. Re:first post by Daengbo · · Score: 0

    That would be my girlfriend. She is Thai. Read my journal for the specifics.

  73. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by alex_ant · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now the million dollar question: Why isn't this the default?

  74. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by sforman · · Score: 1
    Why doesn't Mplayer disable XScreensaver while playing?

    It does. From the mplayer manpage,
    -stop_xscreensaver
    Turns off xscreensaver at startup and turns it on again on exit.
  75. Re:Yup, this will excite windows lusers by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    So, you're saying that you don't understand the difference between a player and a codec? Say, you wouldn't be one of those "win doors" users I keep a-hearing about?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  76. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by LetterJ · · Score: 1

    "Totem is the only media player I've seen that doesn't attempt to have skins or look like a reject from a 1971 Kenwood catalog."

    That's the biggest appeal to the commandline players for me. I absolutely hate "skinned" apps. I don't use Windows styles or themes on my Windows machines, I don't even have wallpaper on any of my machines. So, when I see new media players that not only don't have standard interfaces, but don't even have standard *shapes*, there's no way I'm using them.

  77. Re:Yup, this will excite windows lusers by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    A few points things:

    I'm not an admin. I said I'm monitoring it, not that I'm responsible for stopping it.

    Am I stupid? It "retorspect", probably, for replying to an anonymous coward. IHBT.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  78. Windows-based friends... by Manic+Ken · · Score: 1

    I have already fired off emails to my Windows-based friends to let them...

    Windows-based friends...mmmmmm...lucky you. I dont have any...They think I am weird..antisocial..and smell funky. I have already fired off emails to my Windows-based friends to let them now that the one player to rule them all...that looks strange

    Shouldn't it be:
    I have already fired off emails to my Windows-based friends to let them....,(viriware).Now that one player to rule them all now has (preview) support for their OS, (so we all know the mess they live in).

    Hey, I just got up!! give me som ||..||..||..||(hands).

  79. Re:Yup, this will excite windows lusers by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    You'd think, wouldn't you? And yet I'm still going to get shredded by foaming lunix zealots who can't tell the difference between criticism of an article and criticism of the software it references. Also on the long term plan, comprehension of the phrase "UNUSABLE FOR WINDOWS!"

    Sorry for the interruption. Normal service may now be resumed.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  80. Re:first post by Daengbo · · Score: 1, Funny

    This amazes me. I hadn't tried either of these (mplayer or xine) for a year or more. Last week my girlfriend and I were surfing porn, and because she's so ignorant about these thing, she wanted to download some movies. They were WMPs, and I told her we probably couldn't play them, but that I'd try anyway. I tried mplayer first, because slashdot is always raving about it, and it handled the WMPs, so we went surfing for everything we could find -- I must've had six or more formats downloaded by the time we finished. I was amazed by mplayer, and Goy took me upstairs to practice what we had seen. Surfing porn makes her so horny.
    Anyway, two days later, I decided to let Goy look at the files again. I was in the lab, and it has only xterms with no xv extension, so I tried all the movies with xine. It's a little painful with a 10Mb/s network card, but they all worked, just as mplayer did. Goy pulled my pants down and started on me right there.

    God Bless Mplayer and Xine!
    True story, not inflammatory rhetoric
    Mod me as you will...

  81. Did I read this right? by HerculesMO · · Score: 1

    Is there a version for Windows too??? I hate to think since I'm running the 'inferior' OS that I'd be left out of the great revolution that could occur by my deleting of Windows Media Player, Quicktime, and all other associated annoyances.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  82. Addendum... by HerculesMO · · Score: 0

    If there is a Windows version, where is it on the site? I didn't see it there.

    --
    The price is always right if someone else is paying.
  83. Email social skills. by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    >I have already fired off emails to my Windows-based friends to let them now that the one

    I like and use MPlayer, but if I was using Windows I would find this hell of annoying. Would you like it if your friends sent you a mass email everytime a new version of a Windows program came out?

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:Email social skills. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proper analogy would be: would you like it if your friends told you about a great Windows program becoming available for Linux?

      The answer is: sure, I'd love it! I wouldn't mind for example Kazaa Lite being ported to Linux, nor would I mind my friends telling me about it.

  84. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Or you could just switch to a better desktop - the perfect time now that the 2.4 release is imminent!

    Too bad KDE 3.2 alpha1 is coming out in a few weeks (and beta1 in a month) to steal your users away! muahahahhahaha.

  85. To make a Linux-user's jaws drop... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


    Play the Half-Life2 Blink videos.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:To make a Linux-user's jaws drop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you mean BINK, not BLINK. And there is now a BINK player for Linux.

    2. Re:To make a Linux-user's jaws drop... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


      1. No full screen. For games and game demos thats big.
      2. The point is that Half-Life2 isn't going to run in Linux. And how long will I have to wait/how many hoops will I have to go through for Wine/WineX supports it?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:To make a Linux-user's jaws drop... by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      No Linux release?
      I'm not buying it then.

  86. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    > Do you swing?

    No stfu. I will not listen to your utterly sick sexual fantasies. It's just me and my goat, pal.

  87. Re:first post by fault0 · · Score: 1

    > Keep your Xine....
    > Mplayer is built right. A command line player and > a GUI that is seperate.

    Uh, xine already does this. It even does it better than mplayer since the non-GUI part is a shared library.

    As a result, most of the mplayer frontends are pretty hackishly done. They often have to make elaborate layers between themselves and mplayer. It's much easier to do with xine.

  88. Re:first post by fault0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can also try kmplayer, which is included with kde's extragear packages.

    I personally like kplayer the best.. I think they are adding xine to that too.

  89. Read the man/info by Mathness · · Score: 2, Informative

    MPlayer have a bunch of good and useful "hidden" (as in you have not yet read the man/info page) features, my favorit is -dumpstream to grab video files and trailers of the net. :)

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  90. If you're using Debian by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    And are interested in using cvs builds you might want to try mplayer-update. Matroska support has only been available in cvs for a while now so I've been running this has been a big help for since I've been using matroska for my tv captures since around the time of its release.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  91. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see you encode with xine....

    and I have yet to find a command line interface for xine...

    so again, it's useless for any multimedia projects...

    mplayer can be embedded into a portable tivo type device that does not have X windows even installed...

    xine requires the X libs....

  92. BSplayer - good windows alternative media player. by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    BSplayer is a nice fast, compact media player for windows. It does divx, avi, mp3, ogg vorbis and some other formats rather well. In fact when I couldn't get some divx movies to run without massive frame skips in windows media player and "the playa", I tried BSplayer on advice from a message board and got wonderful results. www.bsplayer.org

  93. And for the mandrakes among us by Rumagent · · Score: 3, Informative
    You should grab the package from LinuxTLE. If you are on RH8.0, it should drop in without a problem.

    And for the many users of Mandrake, MPlayer with the proper codecs (and many other good programs) are available as rpms at PLF
  94. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by ANTI · · Score: 1

    Because I don't want _any_ application kill/suspend any other without my explicit "order" to do so ?

    I have videos running (in a small window in a corner) all day and when I leave my desk I don't stop mplayer, but won't my notebook to autolock!!

    If you want it as default, just put it into your ~/.mplayer/config and forget about it.

    --
    On the other side of the screen it all looked so easy.
  95. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just switched back from KDE to Gnome.

    KDE has tons of nice features, and Konqueror is a great file manager, but it was just too much for what I need. I don't use a file manager that much, so KDE's biggest asset is lost on me. I don't use the ruler program, I don't use most of that stuff. Gnome is lighter and faster, the GTK2 applications are more stable than the KDE counterprts (Gaim is the best instant messanger client from what I've seen, and it speaks every popular protocol.), Gimp is the best photoeditor, Firebird is the best browser, Gnumeric is the best spreadsheet, etc.

  96. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice troll, very nice. Ever heard of KMPlayer? That's a GUI for MPlayer in KDE, which is also -very- lightweight. There's also gmplayer, you know..the one actually included in the MPlayer distribution. Oh, and by the way, both of those programs disable XScreensaver while playing a video; for the command line version to do it, you would have to provide the option for it to do so. Not that I think you've actually tried that recently.

    Throwaway question that will undoubtedly go unanswered, since you were just trying to cause troule anyway; does Totem have anything like mplayer-plugin, a browser plugin that allows you to play inline videos using MPlayer in numerous different browsers?

  97. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by 13Echo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unless you require a scrollbar to navigate a movie, MPlayer generally works well when you associate it with Nautilus. I double-click on a thumbnail for a movie (generated by Gnome-Thumbnail-Factory) and MPlayer launches with the movie. I run it without the GUI though, so I merely use the arrow keys to navigate the movie, SPACE to pause, Q to quit.

    It's true though, that MPlayer's GUI is sucky. I wish that they'd just use a standard GTK based deal, and not some rediculous XMMS/Winamp sort of skin, which by the way also drastically increases the CPU load when playing video files. I've thought of writing a better GUI for MPlayer, but I just don't know enough about GTK programming. Lumiere is a great project, but I've not been able to get it to compile because it is beta code (and is for some reason heavily dependant on specific system configurations and file locations).

  98. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by evilviper · · Score: 1
    And how do I use it then if I have a media machine with an IR mouse?

    What do you mean, "how"?

    I am able to use it perfectly, with my remote control.

    (See MoviX^2 for the functionality that I require...)

    All the docs say is that it starts up and launches gmplayer. Doesn't tell me what you think you need.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  99. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MPlayer is fully functional without any GUI. So what's wrong with using it without a GUI then?

    I think people are determined to use MPlayer (and everything else) from a GUI, just because that's what they've been used-to in the Windows and Mac world... NOT because there is any legitimate reason to do so.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  100. It is actually a relief to hear this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they weren't shut down by the Environmental Protection Agency

    Can you imagine how bad a media play would have to be to be considered an environmental hazard?

  101. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by GiMP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Explain that to my mother, or my grandmother. Trust me, they need big graphical buttons.. my mother doesn't even know which buttons are play and stop on her VCR unless there are words to describe them.

  102. Because it crashes by G�tz · · Score: 1

    Please try to play something with the xscreensaver stopper and -vo sdl, it will segfault :-(

  103. Xine by Hellboy0101 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Xine already does these things for Linux. Uninstall your old version of xine, then go to http://cambuca.ldhs.cetuc.puc-rio.br/xine/ and get the latest build. Plays QT6 files, divx, WMP, DVDs, etc. Also works much better for Freevo if you're into that. RPMs only here (wish the source would be out to manually compile, but oh well). Works on RH9, Mandrake 9.1, and SuSe.

    --
    Because teenage pranks are fun when you're about to die!
  104. Re:first post by GiMP · · Score: 1

    But gstreamer and xine are both shared libraries, gstreamer even has a python binding. This works out a LOT better for writing frontends.

    The truth is that Mplayer's only redeeming attribute is the fact it can play just about anything, provided it is compiled right.

    I just hope that Xine and/or gstreamer catch up quickly :)

  105. Re:Encoding (mencoder) try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    concatenating mpegs is trivial.

    1. cat 1.mpeg 2.mpeg > big.mpeg
    2. mencoder -idx big.mpeg -ovc copy -oac copy -o mybignice.mpeg

    There, that wasn't too hard was it.

    For .avi files, use avimerge:

    avimerge -i 1.avi 2.avi -o big.avi

  106. Now see?... by IANAAC · · Score: 1

    This is what happens when you post offtopic. The parent was modded as flaimbait, so I don't see it (by choice). Here we have a reply that really has nothing to do with media players and I end up lumping him in with the two idiots he's putting down :-)

  107. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Hurga · · Score: 1

    Throwaway Question that will Undoubtedly Get Dozens of Answers while the Rest of the Post Goes Unread: Why doesn't Mplayer disable XScreensaver while playing?)

    Try the option -stop_xscreensaver.

    Hanno

  108. MPlayer ROX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use MPlayer from version v0.1.18 as I recall.. and it didn't want to play all the formats back then.. I had to reboot to windows from time to time to watch videos.. now I do opposite, cause watching videos on windows really sux.. either no sound, jumpy display or both.. sux big time!

    Under linux I just fire mplayer (and ogle for DVDs) and done! can watch and what also importatnt I can fucking scroll/seek in WMA/WMF/WMSHIT formats.. which I can't do under windows using windows media player.. !

  109. bsplayer by floodo1 · · Score: 0

    does no one use bsplayer???

    "best divx player ever" -divx-digest

    chex it out, looks a helluva lot nicer than vlc

    --
    I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
  110. Re:GAyplayer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn!

    In the meantime Windows users already have all of that in Media Player Classic. Open-source, built-in MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 (DVD) playback, QuickTime and Real playback, etc.

  111. Xinerama by teklob · · Score: 1

    What I really need is Xinerama support, so when I play movies on my dual head setup I can choose which monitor to fullscreen the movie on. As it is, it splits it between the two and leaves the outer half of each monitor showing the desktop.

  112. Interface... by singularity · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would love to be able to use MPlayer on my OS X box. The interface, however, is one of the worst example of bad design I think I have ever seen. The program truly has to be seen on OS X to see how bad it is.

    Opening a movie opens the movie in another running program. The controls, on the other hand, are still in the original mplayer application.

    Menus are empty and unusable in the movie's application.

    There are other problems, these are just the major ones.

    Until Mplayer fixes some very serious UI issues in the OS X version, my money (figuratively) is with VLC. VLC also does one required thing - plays movies in full screen on one screen, while allowing me to work on another application on another screen. Mplayer takes over all monitors when in full-screen.

    In order to be accepted across the board, GPL software needs to remember UI. Maybe Mplayer is better on other platforms. It still has a long way to go under OS X.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    1. Re:Interface... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Wow, I thought I was the only one who thinks that MPlayer's GUI is broken on OS X. Long live VLC...

    2. Re:Interface... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think MPlayer has the _best_ interface. A few examples:

      1. Play/Pause with the spacebar, very few apps don't follow this convention.

      2. The left and right arrows move the movie in that direction X number of seconds (x=5? 10?). This is a wonderful change from other apps.

      For example when you're watching a DVD in another application[1] and you miss part of the dialogue, you hit left arrow and it takes you to the beginning of the chapter! how annoying. Now you have to fast forward to where you were, and you lose some of the suspense/immersion.

      With mplayer, you hit left arrow once or twice and you get to see the scene again, very easy and convenient.

      3. f to enter or exit fullscreen, how simple is that.

      There are other commands but I don't really use them, maybe someone else can comment on them. But just on the left/right arrow thing alone I'm completely sold. It's absolutely brilliant.

      Plus, MPlayer is pretty efficient and plays everything you throw at it with good framerate. I have a G4-400 with no Quartz Extreme and it still looks good.

      VideoLan is great, but is more resource intensive than MPlayer. The other reason I don't like it is that one time it locked my machine hard[2], another time I had to ssh into the machine to kill that process since it was using too many resources. MPlayer on the other hand has been solid.

      flying_v

      [1]In the appleDVD player application, left and right arrow take you to a different chapter, but Apple-left or right arrow fast forwards or rewinds. You have no idea how many times I've gotten it wrong and it's really frustrating.

      [2] Something that has only happened one other time, I don't take apps that lock my machine hard lightly.

    3. Re:Interface... by global_diffusion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try using Mplayer from just the command line. It's a lot simpler that way and you never have to mess with the mouse. It sounds annoying, but it's actually much better than the traditional menu/button setup. Having switched from linux to macos x (sweet, sweet powerbooks), not being able to run movies off the command-line (and not being able to watch half my movies) has been one of my big complaints.

  113. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Last week my girlfriend and I were surfing porn,

    I'm sorry Sir, But I'm going to have to ask you to leave, and return your "Property of slashdot" tattoo as well.

  114. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or perhaps, using it in a gui environment it isn't unreasonable for them to expect to control it with a gui as well?
    maybe I'm just crazy though...

  115. MPlayer first impression / review by Experiment+626 · · Score: 2, Informative
    I had never used MPlayer before, but got bored over the weekend and decided to check it out. Since we have an MPlayer topic, I'll provide a little review for others thinking of doing the same.

    I did the install from the RPM's on the MPlayer site instead of doing my own build, they have lots of dependencies, some apparently circular, so installing everything from one rpm command seems to work best. The one library that I didn't already have on my system and wasn't in the RPM's was libfaad, which I quickly found with a little Googling.

    The only other setup I had to do to get MPlayer working was that it expects the DVD drive to be /dev/dvd by default, so I made a symlink for that. MPlayer also lets you set the DVD drive via the settings menu or a command line switch, so this is not a big deal

    The DVD I watched was Disney's "Beauty and the Beast". Yes, I know, evil company. Playing title 1, chapter 1 only showed a Walt Disney logo then playback stopped. I tried various other titles until finally discovering Title 17 was the movie itself. I didn't figure out how to bring up the main DVD menu, which would have hopefully made figuring out where on the disc the movie was trivial.

    Playback was initially jerky and poor. Toggling a couple of the playback / frame dropping options fixed this and playback became flawless on my system.

    I did experience some cryptic error messages and a couple crashes (application crashes, not lockups) so I would characterize MPlayer as very usable but not completely stable.

    As far as user interface, it was good, and similar in layout to Windows Media Player and such. My main complain about the GUI was that many of the buttons are labelled only with a symbol, and hovering the mouse pointer over them did not bring up any kind of help bubble to explain them, so using the GUI involved more trial and error than it should have.

    The other feature I tried out was MP3 playback. It sounded good, but when I associated MP3's in Nautilis with MPlayer and clicked on a second MP3 while the first was playing, it didn't switch songs or enqueue, but rather started up a second instance of MPlayer playing a different song at the same time, which sounded terrible. I'm sure there's a way to fix this (if nothing else, a shell script wrapper would work), but compared to WinAmp doing things right from the start, it still came as a disappointment.

    I haven't tried the other features out (skins, encoding, etc.) but all in all, I was impressed with what I have seen so far. For people looking to play DVD's and other types of media under Linux, MPlayer is well worth downloading.

    1. Re:MPlayer first impression / review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good review. You should do something more in depth and send it to osnews.com or something.

    2. Re:MPlayer first impression / review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other feature I tried out was MP3 playback.

      why would you play mp3s in mplayer, when theres a perfectly good app thats DESIGNED to play mp3s, as well as oggs etc

      oh, theyre even both styled on winamp so you dont have to learn two interfaces.

    3. Re:MPlayer first impression / review by Arandir · · Score: 2, Informative

      For people looking to play DVD's and other types of media under Linux, MPlayer is well worth downloading.

      It also works flawlessly under FreeBSD. I finally figured out the problem with Quicktime playback, and now I have one less reason to boot into Windows. With kmplayer, it's also a native plugin to Konqueror.

      The FreeBSD guys are going to be showing it off at TechTV today.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    4. Re:MPlayer first impression / review by damiam · · Score: 1
      I didn't figure out how to bring up the main DVD menu, which would have hopefully made figuring out where on the disc the movie was trivial.

      Aside from the GUI (mplayer and xine have probably the two most utterly awful GUI's I've ever seen), mplayer's biggest flaw is that it doesn't support interactive DVD menus. This is being addressed in mplayer-G2, which is a rewrite supporting interactivity, pluggable GUIs, and all sorts of fun stuff like that.

      Also, I wouldn't recommend using mplayer as an mp3 jukebox. XMMS, Rhythmbox, etc. are designed for that and work much better than mplayer, which was originally intended to be a simple one-file movie player.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  116. Xine deserves a mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If anything deserves to be mentioned along with mplayer, it's Xine. In fact, I think it's been better than mplayer for quite a while now.

    1. Re:Xine deserves a mention by korgull · · Score: 1

      Correct.
      I have been using both mplayer and xine for a few years now but hardly use mplayer.
      I guess that's mainly a matter of choice though.

      For those not knowing xine : http://xine.sf.net

      Some work on a win32 port has been done also, but I'm not sure of the status. To most developers this has very low priority as not many use windows I think. The xine developers usually welcome any help, so if there are volunteers go ahead !

  117. HWAC3 with Alsa in Audigy? by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1

    Has anybody ever gotten hardware AC3 passthrough working with Mplayer, Alsa, and an Audigy? I get:

    #mplayer -ao alsa9 -ac hwac3 foo.vob
    ALSA lib pcm_hw.c:1055:(snd_pcm_hw_open) open /dev/snd/pcmC0D3p failed: No such device

    even with DevFS mounted...

    It's a bummer not to be able to listen to DVDs with *proper* Dolby Digital AC3, gotta boot to Winders like a chump! This is my biggest Linux-wart at the moment.

  118. culture, history, language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    language family

    magyar or hungarian heritage page

    links for those who are interested in history and culture....

  119. MPlayer 1.0? I'm running 2.0 on my iBook by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    Then why on my iBook does the About MPlayer window list the version as MPlayer OS X version 2 (v2.0b5)?

  120. Conversion coolness... by DrCode · · Score: 1

    Mplayer comes with 'mencode' for creating video streams, and also a script for using it to create VCD's from any source that Mplayer can play. For fun last night, I managed to use it to convert a RealPlayer video to a VCD on a CDRW, and was pleasantly surprised to find that it played perfectly in my Magnavox DVD player.

    This is one nice set of tools.

  121. Digital Rights Management (DRM) by DeckRunr · · Score: 1

    Can either Mplayer or Xine handle any of the digital rights management systems?

  122. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by alex_ant · · Score: 1
    Because I don't want _any_ application kill/suspend any other without my explicit "order" to do so ?

    Why not? This would be a setting that around 99% of mplayer's users would find preferable. How about "if you don't want it as a default, just put it into your ~/.mplayer/config and forget about it," seeing as how loads of mplayer users are probably coming from Windows/Mac environments in which something so stupid and/or highly specialized as that would never be the default. These is a video player we're dealing with here, not a god damn philosophy of the civil liberties of software processes.

  123. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by john_shadows · · Score: 1

    So what's wrong with using it without a GUI then? Nothing - that's why I never compile it with a GUI.

    --
    Will there be people in 2100? Will they be real skinny? vote : the_real_38@yahoo.com
  124. Full implementation on Solaris ? by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have experience with the MPlayer on the Solaris, AIX or IRIX? I'm curious on how the MPlayer performs on Solaris 9 on an Ultrasparc 64-bit CPU. Can it play DiVX or XViD schmoodly as in a Duron system?

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  125. OS X port? by micaelus · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing something, but can someone post a link to the OS X port?

    1. Re:OS X port? by dave+at+hostwerks · · Score: 1

      Sourceforge.net only lists 2.0b4 and a binary compiled for Panther. But no updated binary for 1.0Pre1 yet.

      --
      d a v e
      "Hmmm...upgrades."
  126. GameSpy Owns MPlayer by kstumpf · · Score: 1
    MPlayer used to be a gaming network and server browser. Back in 2000, GameSpy purchased MPlayer, and likely holds all copyrights and trademarks as a result.

    http://www.gaming-age.com/news/2000/12/20-115

    1. Re:GameSpy Owns MPlayer by damiam · · Score: 1

      mplayer (the movie player) is already illegal in a million other ways. I doubt they care much about GameSpy. Besides, the names don't legally conflict because they're in completely unrelated fields.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:GameSpy Owns MPlayer by kstumpf · · Score: 1

      That's arguable. GameSpy has a history of involvement in music, and has even had two related products, RadioSpy and MP3Spy.

  127. VLC is good, but still messed. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    For an OSX app, the interface is still messy.. easily fixable, but messy.

    Why does the playlist a drawer come out of the control widget? If the widget is hidden, I can select "Playlist" from the menu, but it doesn't pop up.
    It should be a simple, resizeable window that I can organize quickly.

    The player widget is visually unappealing. I don't mean I want real eyecandy.. but it's fugly.

    I can't drag & drop a media file onto either the player widget or the video window.. that just does nothing. You have to actually drag to the launch icon on the dock (or wherever you have it).

    There seems to be no reason. I suppose it's OSS, though, right? I can probably go grab the sources and fix it myself, right?

  128. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ah, but you forget about MPlayer G2, which will be stripped of all front-end nonsense and instead implement all kinds of hooks that will allow people to built however vast frontends for it.
    (emphasis mine)

    It would be difficult to recommend something that 'will' exist over something that 'does' exist for someone wanting a gui now. The fact is, Totem is available now, and it works.
  129. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Replicant7 · · Score: 1

    From the man page:

    -stop_xscreensaver
    Turns off xscreensaver at startup and turns it on
    again on exit.

  130. "Impressed" indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only a linux geek would be impressed with having to hand DL libs, config config and config some more just to get it to work, then have it crash a couple of times.

    I can't remember the last time I used a product on Windows that was that bad, not even Windows itself since leaving 98 behind. And this is an "impressive" Linux app? Brother.

    Modify as troll... now!

  131. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I can tell you one big advantage of the GUI: better control of the video position. Without the GUI, all you can do is use the right and left arrows to seek through the video stream at some arbitrary points. But with the slider bar on the GUI, you get much more fine-grained control if you're looking for a specific scene.

  132. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

    Don't forget VLC. I haven't gotten the "LAN" part of it to work yet, but it works great simply as a video player.

  133. I seek software freedom. by jbn-o · · Score: 1
    What do you care what operating system people run?

    Of course, I don't speak for the poster you're responding to but I care about making freedom available to people. You have more software freedom on a Free Software OS (such as GNU/Linux) than you do on a proprietary system (such as Microsoft Windows). I have no interest in giving people more reason to stay with non-free software. But if you're approaching this from the Open Source movement's mentality of merely delivering faster, cheaper, better programs, I can see why you might reach the conclusions you do. I approach this from the desire to make self-determination possible for more people using their computers. Only the freedoms of Free Software helps me do this. Free Software and Open Source don't speak to the same concerns.

    And if you're so bent on having people move from Windows to Linux, why don't you concentrate on making Linux as easy to use and as comfortable as Windows is these days [...]

    I don't care which operating system people run as long as it is a free OS. People have been working on making free OSes more user-friendly for a long time and there is much progress to show for the effort. But this is a difficult task (made artifically harder by oppressive copyright and patent law) and so this requires a lot of effort. But for those who are committed to freedom, not mere practical convenience, the sacrifice and the fight are worth it.

  134. Re:first post by Hellboy0101 · · Score: 1

    You can use Xine for Freevo. By editing your local_config.py, and pointing the app to use Xine, you eliminate many problems with Divx playback. The two in particular are delayed sound, and misplacement of images on the screen (i.e. video moved up to the top or bottom of the screen leaving huge black bars at the top or bottom).

    --
    Because teenage pranks are fun when you're about to die!
  135. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by john_shadows · · Score: 1

    There's a hotkey - to make the slider come up without the GUI - man mplayer

    --
    Will there be people in 2100? Will they be real skinny? vote : the_real_38@yahoo.com
  136. legal questions? by justins · · Score: 1

    Why are they worried about software patents? They ought to be more worried about violating copyright, which is what most of their binary codecs do.

    --
    Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  137. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by MOtisBeard · · Score: 1

    You can also disable the screensaver for every future instance of Mplayer by modifying the conf file, located in either usr/local/etc/mplayer/mplayer.conf or /root/.mplayer/gui.conf. You can find out which conf file mplayer is using by running it from the command line and watching mplayer's initialization messages.

  138. Re:Other recent releases: KMPlayer by Professor+Chaos · · Score: 1

    I've been using KMPlayer almost exclusively since I began using Ark Linux a few months back. It's a desktop apt-rpm based distro and its great. It uses the Keramik/Geramik themes by default which gives the gnome and kde programs a mostly consistant look. Theres going to be a new alpha coming out soon, but they've been pretty stable for me. It's like debian without the excessive zealotry and instead of debs, rpm's, and instead of a crappy installer and configuration utilities, it lets you play tetris on the install! Anyways, it has KMPlayer in its apt sources list and its great (though I prefer kaffeine, the frontend for xine, for dvd's, as it does menus fairly flawlessly in dvd's) in conclusion, KMPlayer rocks (so help out the developer to make it even better :)

  139. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by evilviper · · Score: 1
    Trust me, they need big graphical buttons..

    Well then get some small labels, and write "FFW" on the Right-Arrow, "RRW" on the Left-Arrow (as if those weren't easy enough) and Stop/Pause on "Q" and the Space-Bar. It doesn't get much easier than that.
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  140. Re:Other recent releases: Totem, GNOME 2 media pla by evilviper · · Score: 1
    But with the slider bar on the GUI, you get much more fine-grained control if you're looking for a specific scene.

    That makes absolutely no sense. You can jump forwards/backwards by any factor you prefer, instantly, and repeatedly, for as many times as you like.

    It's not like you need a GUI to show you your position, because there is an OSD that shows you where you are after you jump.

    So what was your point?
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  141. Re:first post by ralphclark · · Score: 1
    and I have yet to find a command line interface for xine...

    On this SuSE 8.1 box (somewhat upgraded via apt4rpm):

    ralph@testbed:~> xine -?

    Usage: xine [OPTIONS]... [MRL]

    OPTIONS are:
    -v, --version Display version.
    --verbose [=level] Set verbosity level. Default is 1.
    -V, --video-driver <drv> Select video driver by id. Available drivers:
    aadxr3 dxr3 xv SyncFB aa xshm none sdl vidixfb vidix fb
    -A, --audio-driver <drv> Select audio driver by id. Available drivers:
    null alsa oss arts esd
    -u, --spu-channel <#> Select SPU (subtitle) channel '#'.
    -a, --audio-channel <#> Select audio channel '#'.
    -p, --auto-play [opt] Play on start. Can be followed by:

    There is much more of this (78 lines total) covering just about every option you could wish for, but I can't get it through Slashdot's lameness filter.

  142. Thanks for showing again... by poptones · · Score: 1
    Just exactly why the linux consumer desktop still blows chunks compared to boxed offerings.

    Flamebait indeed...